skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Constructive dismissal. Not a protected class. Caucasian, male, under 40.

The job was offered, in writing, remote; rto was a material change to the agreed upon working arrangement. While labor rights and protections in the US are flimsy, they do exist.
You know, this feature could be a little side bar on the top right, or just as a header for every post. (I assume its semi automated, but I would be happy to see it all the time)
I see the slashed zero on the right, but I cannot find a way to get that out of the Google font display. Perhaps the slashed zero is actually a different font?
> I think it is because everybody can accept that blindness is a defect. Eyes are supposed to see. If they don't they are broken.

Perhaps I should have said 'visual impairment' research, as that sort of thing is also a spectrum. I'm also quite visually impaired, but I'm far less concerned with that because I can live with it.

Still, what about deafness research?
So in this hypothetical scenario where everything is flowers and sunshine, the secular, peaceful Israel is still an ethnostate with a two-state outcome that keeps its ethnic cleansing-attained Jewish majority.

It’s wild to me that this is what you consider the best case scenario in a situation where Israel is experiencing complete peace. And then ending it with an unintentional “nur für Deutsche” reference. The Sweden reference is especially apt, given that’s what the Swedish Antisemitic Union also used as a slogan[0]

> but most of the places Palestinians left during the war they started on Israel 1947

You really can’t help yourself huh.

[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_Antisemitic_Union
Great way to get a maximum traversal rate per module added to the spec.
very good, but I would say (since "light cone" is of such common parlance) that the physical 3d analogous projection would be two slightly overlapping 3d-venn diagram funnels conjoining at an "indefinitely" (asymptotically smaller) small space-time minkowski manifold.

naked singularities themselves, however, do not exist.
In the short or long term?
Because B is quite possibly 0 in this case, given the limited information we have here.
> What you're complaining about is overreach by the IRS in relation to foreign assets held by US citizens (ie FATCA) and the reporting requirements (eg Form 7938 and FBAR)

A big problem is the US is one of the few countries in the world which taxes its citizens (and green card holders) worldwide, for life, no matter how long they’ve been outside the United States. Most countries don’t tax non-resident citizens, or only do so for a limited period of a few years.

The only other country that does it, that I know of, is Eritrea - and it has been widely condemned by the international community for its “diaspora tax”. But no condemnation for the US diaspora tax, despite actually being far more onerous than Eritrea’s is
> the Big Bang would be the white hole horizon (i.e. a singularity in out past)

The white hole horizon is not the same thing as the white hole singularity. The "Big Bang" as an initial singularity in our universe (which is not actually the correct usage of the term "Big Bang", but that's a whole other discussion) would be the white hole singularity, not the horizon.

Note also that in a white hole model of our universe, we would be inside the white hole horizon, not outside it.
Edit: Kotlin is perfectly fine for _just_ web-servers, Vert.X is great. On systems programming, read below:

All JVM languages are not viable by definition for this domain. Object oriented and heavily abstracted nature of the underlying runtime implementations prevents their effective usage in systems programming due to lack of fast FFI, structs, particularly so of custom layout, and the historical aversion of the ecosystem to low-level features.

Kotlin native does not count because presently it has 0.1-0.001x performance of OpenJDK, it is that bad, and I assume is subject to the common subset of features that must also be expressible with JVM.

.NET, especially with compilation to native statically linked binaries (NativeAOT) is an option, and I believe, due to ecosystem maturity as well as very heavy focus on performance in all recent .NET versions as well as continued improvement of low-level features (portable SIMD, byref pointers with simple lifetime analysis, static linking with C/C++/Rust/etc.), it is a strong contender. Unlike Java, C# has great systems programming story, after all, it was influenced as much by C++ as it was by Java, sadly many only ever think about the latter.

However, I'm looking forward to Swift 6. Once it is out, I'd love to see it offer more opportunities at ensuring static dispatch and generic monomorphization (in .NET, generics with struct arguments are always monomorphized like in Rust, so you have tools for zero-cost abstractions) and happy paths allowing to bypass prohibitive cost of ARC with new annotations. By using LLVM, Swift has theoretically great performance ceiling, even if it does not deliver on it just yet, losing to C# by a good margin on the more complicated code due to ARC and dynamic dispatch. But because Apple seems to be invested in using it for tasks that will require addressing these shortcomings, it is pretty exciting to see where they will take it.
You may have less leverage as an individual.

I’ve done quite a bit of negotiation in my career and ended up with many perks and pay bumps that weren’t schedule or written down.

What I’m describing is my actual real life experience.
No wonder the U.S is so worried about Huawei.
> What if we're expanding because we are in a black hole that is being fed by a collapsing star or other object in a many orders of magnitude larger scale universe?

Expanding and collapsing are two different things. So I don't see how your suggestion here makes any sense.
If there are any novel or situation-specific conclusions drawn, that sounds like an easy sell to CPAs and independent tax preparers. Maybe even individual tax optimizers.

My naive assumption is that sophisticated analysis will return the same few well-known recommendations almost all the time -- the taxation variant of eating properly, sleeping regularly, and getting appropriate exercise.
Surely even in a shooter game you spend some amount of time in menus where you do have a cursor, right? Is this why I sometimes get completely 'wrong' cursor movement in games?
That’s one ugly Å, without any separation. The font looks nice in general though.
> The difficulty is the same as for current sandboxing efforts on desktop Linux though

You're right, that is a problem. However, the situation on Linux is even worse since you can't even nest sandboxes/containers in most real-world situations.
> If the space containing the matter is stretching does that still count as expansion?

"Space stretching" is a vague pop science description that doesn't really correspond to anything in the actual physics model. So it doesn't count as anything; you should just ignore it.
They came from DHCP or RDNSS in RA.
Which is part of the security of the hash. When I embed a script on my site I get the hash at the time I test it. If the content changes without my knowledge it will not allow a replacement from the source. Assets are not overly cacheable if they don't change the location when the file changes.
I'm in Research and I beg to differ. (My own opinion.)
How many people pursue business or accounting degrees instead of mechanical engineering or biotechnology degrees? The talent flows to what policy incentivizes, over the long run.

Your point, that people can't just switch careers willy nilly, actually reinforces the point of the article -- that incentivizing accounting games actually reduces time spent on impactful pursuits in the long run.
Not a winter, but a correction akin to crypto a couple years ago.
"Mathematics is the Poetry of Science" is a great title
that also explains the phenomenon noted in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41570976
> EM waves can get _transformed_ into mass.

In the sense that they can be absorbed by matter and (possibly) increase the invariant mass of the matter, yes.
magnitude difference between dark energy and the schwarzschild radius
No this appears to be if an application registers a DNS resolver proxy on the local system, getaddrinfo doesn't use the proxy, and presumably just hits whatever the network interface's configured DNS server is.
Awesome tool and I use it often. One under utilized feature of rga is its integration with fuzzy search (fzf) that provides interactive outputs compared to running the commands and collecting outputs in sequence. So in short use rga-fzf instead of rga in CLI.
> Does GR predict that there would be any waves confined to the inside of the merged black hole?

Yes, but we would of course never observe those, and they would not reduce the externally measured mass of the merged hole.
You can’t control anything if they do DNS over HTTPS to a hardcoded IP they control and cert pin so you can’t MITM the connection, can you?
It's actually just the SIL font license, which is what basically every open source font uses. They just removed the preamble of it for some reason.
There is no strong evidence to go on.

What are you arguing?

They have Autism until proven otherwise?

About 0.5% of people were diagnosed with Autism before 1990: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4113600/

If we're making assumptions, statistically, we'd probably want to assume the other way.
>Pretty sure the idea wholesale was dead on arrival. Much less invasive apps on IOS were taken down by Apple. And the appification of mobile more or less split that idea into 4-5 different apps.

I thought somebody would try to make something like mobile Xfire at least for the Android where you could for example; connect with your gamer friends, see what they are playing, invite them to games, share screenshots and short gameplay clips etc. Google Play has some tidbits of that but clearly social gaming is not their focus.

Xfire was powerful beast at the time and I also liked Facebook social gaming features as well. Discord and Steam are good enough for PC but nothing like that exists for mobile social gaming. I still to this day fantasize about having something like Xfire on mobile but like I said somebody should've made it 10 years ago but now it is probably too late or it's not idk, it seems like Apple is relaxing their rules on their iOS walled garden.

>I mean, Epic wins the mobile store by default if Steam isn't even showing a modicrum of interest in the platform to begin with. And I don't see any other competitor rising up in that space.

Steam's focus is PC, they earn billions from PC gaming so they don't need to worry about mobile.

Also Microsoft wanted to open their mobile games store[1][2] but idk what's with that....they are probably preoccupied with their Xbox and cloud gaming strategy so they can't think about mobile gaming.

[1] https://techcrunch.com/2024/05/10/microsoft-is-launching-its...

[2] https://www.theverge.com/2024/5/9/24153245/microsoft-xbox-mo...
getaddrinfo isn't its predecessors, there's nothing error-prone about it. The only thing that's nontrivial is falling back if the first server is unresponsive, and even there the obvious calling code is fine for almost all apps.
We will see. But at this point it is ill advised to consider Israel to be in the right. We have seen how they conduct their targeting in Gaza, and we have no reason to believe their targeting practice is any more careful, nor humane in Lebanon.

We have every reason to suspect they had no idea who would be carrying these pagers. That they did consider any Hezbollah member to be a legitimate target, be they senior administrators at a hospital, media workers, politicians, etc.

At the very least they must have known that higher party members (i.e. politicians) would be carrying the pagers, and that they had no idea who was actually close when they detonated, and simply didn’t care if children got hurt.

An army who is on trial for genocide does not deserve the benefit of the doubt.
> and that the IRS requires the extra reporting to try to counteract that.

The extra reporting largely exists because of the fundamental and rather unique misdesign of the US tax system - taxing citizens’ worldwide income for life. Most countries only tax (1) worldwide income for residents (2) in-country income for non-residents
I see no misallocated resources. I enjoy exploiting the system that enables the yacht-havers, because then I too can have a yacht.

And while I get the feeling that most HN commenters feel some sort of misplaced injustice due to this, but the thrill of the game is part of the fun to me. I’d rather that than factory work where I can guarantee my skills will never position me to rise above my station.

The tech industry is so unique in this and it blows my mind how people just want to throw it all away.
Agreed.

All this fearmongering about telegram and tiktok is weird.

China can decide what it wants from me- I have no plans to visit or engage with regime; however my life is dependent on the US not thinking of me as interesting.

So, the less I give to US companies, the better.

Especially as, being a non-US citizen I have no right to privacy afforded to me in the constitution, and US companies can be forced to comply with the government in secret- much in the same way we consider that China does it to even part-owned China based companies.
> Singletons used to be an anti-pattern

Singleton was never the antipattern, it was the GoF implementation using the class to manage the singleton instance that everyone eventually ran from. Object lifecycles like Singleton are managed these days by a module system or a DI container.
On modern mainstream Android devices, the Webview is based on chromium and regularly updated through the play store
> we already know that GR isn't the whole story when it comes to BHs. See "soft hair" black holes

More precisely, most physicists believe that GR isn't the whole story. But we have no actual evidence for quantum gravity speculations like "soft hair". They're just speculations at this point. We don't know that any of them will actually turn out to be right.
Guilty parties often cast the first accusation.
Uh, somehow I forgot to link the Reddit thread I cited: https://www.reddit.com/r/mintuit/comments/17iq9gx/plaid_api_...

Also in June of this year Plaid decommissioned its development platform but added a (quite) limited free tier of the production platform: https://www.reddit.com/r/fintech/comments/1c8xxet/plaid_prod... This doesn't really invalidate the main point of my comment, but it does affect a few details.
If they made the sides slightly outwardly concave, think an opened bottle cap, it would highlight the vertices and I think that would help people identify it as a polygon rather then a circle --I definitely could be wrong though.
I liked it when I read it. But you are the first person that also sees the book as satire. I started hating the book because so many people think it's so amazing when it's supposed to be like space balls.
>Is there any evidence of the FAA doing this - sitting on applications that they otherwise should process?

Leaded avgas replacement is one such example. Pretty much every step was like pulling teeth.
> the physical 3d analogous projection would be two slightly overlapping 3d-venn diagram funnels conjoining at an "indefinitely" (asymptotically smaller) small space-time minkowski manifold.

I'm not sure what you mean by this, but it doesn't seem to correspond to any actual physical model that I'm aware of.
Who are your representatives? Do they really represent you?
no, he talks about the perception of branching. The universe isn't branching, a coherent thread we observe is.

It's the difference between tracing a path on a graph, and seeing a graph change.
I quit my job to start my own company. We are immediately profitable and already on trajectory to double my previous income (which was high $1xx,000).

You can replace code monkeys, but you can’t replace people who can use code to solve real business problems on time and under budget.
I'm glad you found something you like. I just want to make it clear that the things about Rust that make it "unfriendly" are also the things that make it able to do things other languages can't do, like compile-time memory safety. Depending on what you are making, that might make little difference. I just wanted to make sure you appreciated what Rust can do that other languages can't.
Yep. A lot of eggs are currently in one, barely-solvent basket. What happens next is anyone's guess.
Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boycott,_Divestment_and_Sanc...
> More magic (thus less required explicitness) and less involvement with memory management are typically considered as friendly traits in programming languages.

Really depends on the context. I really, really, really hated this instinct in the ruby on rails community when I was still doing that. Magic is nice until it doesn't work the way you expect, which is when it becomes an active liability.

I really don't spend much time thinking about memory management in Rust, but I can certainly understand why one might be happy to not have to design around ownership and lifetimes. I really like the explicit nature of it, though, makes it super easy to read and reason about code you've never seen before.
macOS firewall blocking web browsing after upgrading to Sequoia
Usually, it's the other way around: https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/...

binary-trees is almost completely dominated by the time spent in allocator code, and stresses its throughput. This benchmark showcases how big of a gap is between manual per-thread arenas, then tracing generational multi-heap GCs, then ARC and more specialized designs like Go GC. Honorable mention goes to BEAM which also showcases excellent throughput by having process-level independent GCs, in this case resembling the behavior of .NET's and OpenJDK GC implementations.
The Hilbert curve does contain every point in the unit square. It is a limit of curves, and so can contain points even not in the intermediate constructions. This is similar to how the limit of 1/x as x -> infinity can be 0, even though 1/x never equals 0.
Hell no, the IRS doesn't forget something like this.
On average, the macros in an Office document add features to the software and aren't run to render any content. So like toggling a group of settings or inserting some content or whatever. They may change the content, but it's done at a point in time by the user, not each time the document is opened.

And then, on average, most users don't use macros in their documents.

So yes, negligible.
> it has four, going on five, esoteric proper nouns in one sentence.

F'lar is unexplained within that sentence. Mnementh is also unexplained, but sounds like a constellation.

Fax and the High Reaches are explicitly marked as the names of a person and a place. Those are going to appear as proper nouns no matter what genre you're reading. It's the only possible way to do things. This is like complaining that Robin Hood's primary antagonist is the Sheriff of Nottingham. What's the complaint?
Sorry, I should have said "from my immediate perspective". Society certainly has a responsibility to autistic people that is mostly overlooked, although I am not complaining personally.
complexity of life's scale somehow trillions of magnitudes "smaller" than a similarly constructed universe is not only completely irreconcilably untestable (outside of one thought one) but also reminiscent of m-theory (11 dimensions) and the plot of men in black
"unlucky civilians are fair game" that's been an unfortunate fact of war since, well, war was invented. maybe you should more angry at the people who started the war and put people in harms way, instead of complaining that one of the most precise operations still had unintended civilian consequences.

taking the moral high ground is easy when you are not the one making decisions, and while the lesser of two evils (in your car bomb example) doesn't make sense on a personal level, it does make sense on a macro level
Shorting the battery would probably cause an explosion in around one minute. That's close enough to simultaneous.

From https://www.mdpi.com/2313-0105/8/11/201

A puncture causes runaway/explosion in seconds. Overcharging takes 13 minutes. There's not good data on a dead short (because it's unlikely during normal operation), but it's going to be between those on the faster end. From personal experience a shorts cause things to get noticeably hot after about 10 seconds, the graphs show that once you hit 60C things rapidly get worse.

A relay may have been required to hold the short as the battery stops supplying voltage.
> He stumbled across an idea with high PMF

Ideas don't have product-market fit. Products do.

And for your product to fit the market takes an incredible amount of execution. Especially in tech startups!
"Sign in with Google" is a show-stopper.
You seem to be suggesting that it's good writing style to make your reader struggle as if with a foreign language?
Did you know UK tax law makes every scheme whose primary purpose is tax avoidance tax evasion? Courts are not generally very impressed by them - which is why it requires a captured government (Ireland) to do them and ideally some sort of multinational scheme so every challenge is a hugely difficult endeavour.
Why isn't it better to cause fewer civilian casualties &/or those of lesser severity than a shooting fight or missile attack?[1] Given the situation has already degenerated to its current state where fighting is the status quo and all options lead to innocent casualties then minimizing those is the horrible "OK" option. Not okay in the sense of desirable, not okay in the sense that things should never have degenerate to this level to begin with, only okay as the less horrible option.

[1] Videos show the explosions highly limited in their ability to cause injuries as bad as a bullet to anyone ever a foot or two away from the explosions, much less than I would expect from anything more conventional.
Their commercial is a low-key banger

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duJwGSUhRQA
Ah, we have `openapi-generator` already (look it up) and it works well enough. I plan on starting to use OpenAPI only for types and be able to generate structs and various other types in several languages -- fingers crossed.
This comment comes up every time tax evasion is discussed, and it's always presented as self-evident, when it really is not. I think there's no distinction, except an illusory one invented by tax evaders, and I've never seen a coherent argument to the contrary.
LOOL: Low-Overhead, Optimization-Log-Guided Compiler Fuzzing
How? There's a big difference between avoidance and evasion, but avoidance and minimization mean pretty much the same thing in this context.
I mean, it's kind of both? It's inherently individual, but if loads of people are killing themselves it might be a symptom of societal dysfunction.
Tax avoidance and evasion are not distinct categories. Some things are clearly legal. Some things are clearly illegal. And for many things, the legality can only be determined by a court after the fact.

Laws are inherently ambiguous. There is no objective classification that tells for each possible action whether it is legal or illegal. That's why courts and lawyers are needed.
My first research project in undergrad involved quantum dots so buying one of these would largely be for sentimental reasons. (I haven't bought one because the last time I needed a TV they were pretty pricey but next time I probably will). So I'd be pissed. I imagine I'm a special case here though
Would that by chance be the Pointfree font?
But ordinary people can buy stock, and should buy index funds at least.

There are plenty of reasons why they do not, but in almost all cases they are not good reasons. There are some extreme exceptions, but then you're outside of "ordinary".