skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Depends on the country probably. In some places, at least reasonably high English fluency is near universal. It wouldn't be surprising if these countries eventually became effectively bilingual.
Facebook has an explicit licence, per Facebook's terms of use.
Not really. There have been few weeks in 2022, where it was close to 1, but otherwise, 0,9 for the last few years is much closer to reality.

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/EUR=X/
> Communism's defining feature is that there is no longer a state.

Seriously? Who takes all the resources and allocates them "according to each person's need" then? :)

> But it remains that communism cannot exist without having achieved post-scarcity. How could it?

All the scarce resources are being stolen^H^H^Hshared in common.

Communism predates the idea of post scarcity by a hundred years or more AFAIK.
howdy! Clay makers here. Can you share more? Did you try Clay v1 or v0.2
What image size embeddings from what instrument?

We did try to relate OSM tags to Clay embeddings, but it didn't scale well. We did not give up, but we are re-considering ( https://github.com/Clay-foundation/earth-text ). I think SatClip plus OSM is a better approach. or LLM embeddings mapped to Clay embeddings...
Obviously nobody did that.

The post has been edited.
You clearly have not read the post :D
Acquisitions didn't use Waterfall that I ever saw, until you got to the software specific courses. Then they did, and it was one of several software development lifecycles you were allowed to choose between for projects.

Many program offices and project managers selected it because it was pretty, not because it was sensible.

> These days the Air Force has caught on to "agile". They even have 400-page manuals on the process to follow to be "agile"! We still cut some corners here and there and do what we think makes sense, but there's far less process push-back than there was in the past.

Circa 2010 (+/- a couple years) USAF also picked up Lean in a big way. But their version of Lean was almost exactly the opposite, in practice, of what was done and described by industry as Lean. A key element of Lean being that you actually let the people doing the work provide feedback and direct improvement efforts. USAF's version had the managers (who never did the work) walk around and observe, then change processes to be "leaner". That is, pure scientific management in the Taylorism style.

USAF is a great place for good ideas to get their names reused for old ideas.
I love baked sweet potato fries. I don’t care if they tend to be softer, that natural sweetness is just so good.
Who, what, where, when, why?

Organize with inverted pyramid (most important information at the top).

Avoid jargon and fancy words. Use examples.

This is all basic stuff you'd learn in a journalism class. Does anyone teach that anymore?
A picture as an input for a GET seems like a very strange use-case. Can you elaborate?

I do agree on the quirkiness of encoding a bunch of data in the URL. Its nice to decouple the endpoint from the input at a more fundamental level.
So does schizophrenia.
Then these roles should be more involved with the wedding planning process. Neither the best man nor the maid of honor have the budget nor the authority to make sure things go smoothly.
There's no evidence that it does stay stable- the author is making a lot of assumptions about the 'implied setting' of OD&D that aren't really supported by the game materials at the time. 40 silver pieces couple be 40 Roman denarii, 40 pre-1965 US quarters, or 40 chunks of a silver bracelet. They could represent the pocket change of a dungeon builder, but be a considerable sum to the barbarian that finds them. The implied uniformity is just because the author lacks imagination.
Our training cutoff date was the end of 2022. Here's our blogpost on the 2024 hurricane season https://silurian.ai/posts/001/hurricane_tracks
EDS had some fun marketing around project management:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_dgWl83cTM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pz1iNSqqixc

And still ended up defunct:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Data_Systems

I settled on this methodology years ago, and try to accept people as they are... rather than how I'd like them to be...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PERT

i.e. if a key item is taking too long, than spawn a redundant replacement permutation. Once either key deliverable is received, restructure the under-performing division.

Lets be honest, some people are happy being a liability... and they belong with your competition. lol =3
nasty evil company.
Can you expand on the "greatest technology" half of your comment?

I can see plenty of clear reasons why bureaucratic collective action is in need of investment, but I'm predisposed to suspect that's because currently it's pretty bad.
Famous grifter seeks grift. News at 11.

We knew this would happen after the board tried to prevent it and failed.
Eh it'll probably be the de-facto public/professional/transactional register and people will speak another language at home.
Chrome Dev tools has this feature. It's not as useful because when you navigate to another page, it resets the used CSS rules.
because in the past it didn't have those functional constructors so things like underscore or lodash would be needed but adding a layer as you mentioned. It is not good, for me, to add a dependency for this again. But in the end I have in my utils file a few functions that basically do what JAQT does and I might copy a few more.
650-foot tsunami in Greenland fjord made waves that lasted 9 days
In India we use Natural Intelligence - Astrology - for predicting results. Note that it has high percentage of hallucinations.
One of the nice things about Git is that it is a fast (not just local but fast—these people care about speed) lookup program for all things relating to the code.
I want all immediately useful code information inside Git. Because then I look it up quickly. Unlike having to go to at least two different web applications (PRs and issue tracker) and find the info there, often in an inferior and more convoluted format.

But it takes surprisingly little to sell back centralization and lock-in to developers, even when working on top of a decentralized tool.
There is a long form version that might not seem to be errant goggledeygook to you. But this is the short form. Most neuroscientists would probably get it. Mist cognitive neuroscientist understand the key role of rhythmic feedback activity between thalamus and cortex.

For pure fun you might ask ChatGPT or Claude 3.5 Sonnet: “Is this pure bs or can you explain this HN comment?”
What if writing tests was a joyful experience? (2023)
While he does seem to be going progressively downhill, it started a long time before the Twitter thing. Remember the imaginary cave submarine?
Amazing. Lettuce that has increased beta carotene content – something we can already get from carrots – and, as a bonus, now looks unappetisingly like past-its-best regular lettuce.
Many successful rewrites are Waterfalls, regardless of method used for first time.
One interesting way of using this I've heard of; is attaching it to a `-[UIViewController dealloc]`, and being able to "hear" (or rather notice the lack of sound) retain cycles this way.
By my reading, the outrage is likely coming from the cushioned stereotyping from the podcast participant. They're stating that "neckbeard types" and autists aren't customer-ready and are uncomfortable talking with customers. That second part is worse because it may lead to assuming that those folks would never want to talk to customers, or even learn how, and so the PMs might "protect" them by never offering them the chance, while assuring themselves "that's okay, that's great, I mean it takes all kinds".
> It doesn't actually, the "server" can (and in many cases does) run in the JS event loop.

Yeah I know it is possible, just not trivial. So for me it was more complex to implement it in the browser than just create a simpler tree-sitter.
Separate question: are there any new startups out there writing code primarily in Clojure?
If you mean:

Brendan Eich, the creator of JavaScript and a co-signatory of this letter, wrote in 2006 that “ECMAScript was always an unwanted trade name that sounds like a skin disease.”

Then this is not a matter of trademark or identity. It is only a matter of marketing. If this is just a matter of trademark my comment remains equally valid. Just use a different name.
I think it means only "select" servers in the sense of "those who explicitly contacted META and agreed to the terms".
Your reply and Jerrrrrrry's closed this understanding for me.

The attack itself can't be mitigated because there's the incentive to try to force the blockchain with your own theft block because your fee is much higher for what appears to be the same transaction. But this attack, like you said, is only feasible for this niche domain of low entropy private keys.
> Of course D&D is not an accurate picture of the medieval era

I don't think that's what being stated in TFA. The argument is that there's nothing medieval about it (except maybe some of the weapons), contradicting Gygax's own assertions:

> You can be forgiven for thinking that OD&D is a medieval European fantasy game. After all, Gary Gygax himself says so. He describes the original D&D books as “Rules for Fantastic Medieval War Games” (on the cover) and “rules [for] designing your own fantastic-medieval campaign” (in the introduction).

As for this:

> There's magic in D&D!

You could devise a medieval society where magic exists. This is not what D&D does. That's the point.
So do non 501c3s mean nothing now? (I guess you could argue that they never meant much?) Is bootstrapping as a nonprofit intended to reduce tax burden? What’s the point of being a non-profit?
I'd say more than 5 meetings a week for an IC rather than two in a day. (I have 3 meetings a week, but two of them are coincidentally on the same day). Managers will naturally have more meetings.
I forget if this is a setting or on by default, but VScode will play a sound when a task is finished running, and it's different based on whether the task succeeded or failed. I use this so that I can leave long running jobs (usually testcases) running and not have to keep checking on the status.
You are given a figma that wasn't already researched and validated against requirements? If it takes a week for a team to fiddle around with a design asset only to learn customers/clients would be fine with a simpler approach, everyone failed the assignment. This was intended as a rhetorical question... I know many teams let designers waste tons of time in a vacuum and PMs are off in lalaland focused on the wrong activities, when they should be focused "building the right thing" and carefully validating that and communicating outcomes to the team and customers. Im all for letting Engineers along for the ride, but too often they (more the jr mid-level ones) are checked out during that process, not asking implementation questions or contributing to research process, until its all hindsight.
Also, war-time leaders usually make terrible peace time leaders and vice versa.

If your company finds itself in battle mode and the senior leadership doesn't move aside for a hired gun, be very worried and polish up that resume.

Once peace time arrives, same thing in reverse.
So many anecdotes where people could've used this message.

For example, I saw a non-technical leader, who thought they were the relationships person, and would try achieve a vibe with customer and partner teams.

And when team members said they needed access, the leader once inadvertently revealed their disgust at the idea of nerds ruining that vibe.

Suffice it to say that the most key relationships, which were temporarily charmed, eventually got very un-charmed, due to the inevitable effects of silo-ing customer exposure.

The article suggests that, even if the leader thought that the team members were nerds who'd cramp their style, they should instead be gracious party hosts, and figure out how to introduce the "nerds" to the "party".
I once configured a Jenkins instance to play different sound effects when certain builds would fail. Originally these were played out of our big office TV, but its speakers broke at some point. A few years later, a couple of new hires came up to me to tell me they thought their laptops were infected with malware, because it would sometimes make weird noises. Turns out they had Jenkins open in a browser tab, and it would play the sounds when builds broke.
My biggest frustration is remembering to use LiteralPath so filenames with [] in them don't cause trouble
A highly specific domain like this is what? $12 a year?
>Imagine an elevator, gas pump, vending machine, or laundromat emitting sound effects constantly.

This a non-that-inaccurate depiction of how life in Japan is, but thankfully one adapts quite quickly to that.
As little as possible might be more than they could get elsewhere. Plus if you don't have a tax ID you don't pay taxes.

Additionally they could be working in the gig economy. I swear I have never had a delivery from uber eats where the person doing the delivery was the same as the photo on the app. What's happening there is they are renting the account for the day.

Don't get me wrong these people are being exploited, but they could be making more than if they were home.
How to deliver mobile notifications when a user is holding their unlocked phone
That's a pretty watch, especially the version with the white dial. It's rather expensive though...
Lol he didn’t build 1000 houses. 100 only. But also, I think many of the houses were rushed to build… so…
I worked at a help desk one summer and every inbox had a different sound effect. We had several different external customers each with a dedicated machine to handle their tickets. The most critical customers (i.e. the biggest fines) got the loudest, most annoying sounds. Everything was an animal sound so the place literally sounded like a zoo on busy days. The manager absolutely hated bringing various big shot tours through our call center because of the ridiculous noise but we also had a perfect record.
If by scripting monkey friendly you mean Javascript or Python, nah I'm going to use that.
I believe the claim is that we have no more powerful technology for the coordination of human action at very large scales. If so, I wouldn't disagree.
Great idea but I hope you dont mind if I’ll do you one better: cook that same potato in a closed container (could be a bowl with a dish on top) in the microwave on high for 4 minutes. It’ll be almost as delicious, maybe more nutritious, for 1/10 the time and electricity.
https://www.tensorzero.com/docs/gateway/benchmarks :)
Europe became a failed model of state-capitalist relations
The word "Eldritch" as in "Eldritch Horror" comes from the same root as the word Elf.

Elves were terrifying forest creatures akin to djinn. They were horrors that would give you amazing things at a terrible cost, and from the medieval period we hear only the stories of the rare survivors of their actions.

(like Tam Lin who was given temporary immortality at the cost of being the slave of the elf queen and being tithed to hell unless some other mortal saved him)

or would literally kill you and drag your soul to hell if they encountered you

(the Wild Hunt)

or tricksters who would ask you for a favor and in the process attempt to steal you away as a slave

(there was a midwife who was summoned to help with an elven childbirth, after she was done the husband tried to get her to eat or drink of their food, but the elf-wife had warned her that if she did she would become his property)

They were not cutesy Santa's helpers or Legolases (Legolai?) or whatever flavor anime blonde girl you're thinking of. They were horrors you hoped to never encounter, the dark things in the forest looking for their next plaything.
Agency cosplay sounds like the right phrase. Everyone wants to believe they have the power and resources to achieve their potential. Even in dying & desperate departments warring with themselves. If a professional doesn't believe their actions get good outcomes, they quit or quiet-quit.

For the manager trapped between their hopes and reality, this blogpost is basically therapy. It comforts with a classic remedy: level up your game and you can win the game. Replace negativity with a "bias heavily toward action". Tell yourself and your reports: "perfection is the enemy of done", have "ruthless prioritization", be "laser-focused on shipping what matters most“. Believe in this all until you get a new position (with real agency), then you can discard this illusion along with your reports.

An older phrase for this phenomena, absent the management aspect, could be "hustle porn." If you ignore ethics, and work crazy hard and crazy smart, you'll win https://www.inc.com/serhat-pala/alexis-ohanian-says-hustle-p... . Though in my experience, you'll just end up crazy.
Not directly related to the question. A few years ago, I read about that B-tree is also recommended for in-memory operations because the latency between CPU/memory is high now.
Waterfalls are good for rewrites, e.g. from Python to Go, because problem/solution territory is explored already.
I have a domain name that I haven't used in years. I keep renewing it though, just in case.
The abuse and toxic workplace had been exposed a few years back but nobody took those allegations seriously
I'm finding the posts confusing -- is the prediction the images?

What exactly is predicted and what is the actual path in those videos?
Right, but D&D exaggerates this mechanism to unrealistic lengths, in order to maintain the epicness of high fantasy. If you accumulate enough levels in D&D, you can destroy entire armies and tackle literal gods. Most of all, there's a limit (based on your AC and the enemies modifiers) under which lower challenge-rate enemies can't literally touch you (save maybe for critical hits), which is obviously not how it works in real combat.

I remember there were "realistic" alternatives to D&D in the 90s, with thousands of detailed tables and the concept of hit zones, where any enemy could potentially even kill you with enough luck (say lucky hit to the back of your armored head from peasant with a spiked club), and you could always get maimed or crippled in some ways (because you wouldn't only lose HP when you get hit, you can break your foot or arm etc).

Clearly, you had to have a much more cautious style of playing and you didn't have as much fun as in D&D, where the master would tailor a series of increasingly challenging but killable encounters until you got to destroy an epic, ridiculously powered villain at the end of the campaign.
> Merging main into the feature branch was the original intent on how to do it.

Based on?
Or maybe shall we all start calling it EcmaScript?

If anything to break with the old (IE6 and similar) javascripts that are still there, running somewhere.
Use cases like reverse image search come to mind
We had to make something similar. We have both huge tenants (200k users in one tenant) and small tenants with 10 users. Sometimes there are spikes when a large tenant generates thousands of jobs. In a naive implementation, 1 tenant would be able to completely block job processing for all other tenants. We have to make sure the next job is picked from a different tenant each time, so that all tenants were served fairly. However, a large tenant may end up waiting for its jobs to complete for too long. In that case, we move such a tenant to a different infrastructure (sometimes, fully dedicated).
> and of course, more money then you could ever dream of making at any other company.

I didn't really find anything in the pdf outrageous except this line.
> And now there is really absolutely zero reason to have as high as possible productivity.

Why? Redistribution is a problem and of course there are negative externalities (environmental and other) associated with the high growth over the few hundred years. But it doesn't mean that productivity can't continue growing even if we find ways to handle those things.

> Like most people are being forced to pretend to be super productive at totally bullshit jobs because we really do not need that much labour any more to get things done

So they aren't super productive? Inefficiencies exist in every system. And people spending a lot of effort working without producing any real value is not particularly "capitalist" at all.

But I do think that "capitalism" (again, it's very hard to provide any meaningful arguments when it's not at all clear what you mean by that specifically) enables higher productivity but it doesn't necessarily force you to maximize your productivity (due to technological and institutional progress we should be able to have enough surplus, at least for a generation or so, unless people start having children again..)

Anyway. What alternatives would you propose?
AI will just be another accelerator for the trend that society is not run for the benefit of all people but for the benefit of a few people who are making lots of money. At some point we'll have to make a decision whether this trend of more and more power accumulating at the top can continue or whether we make rules that allow everybody to benefit from technological progress.

Judging from history it's unlikely that the wealthy and powerful will give up anything voluntarily.
The answer isn't to not even read what they are doing and just assume the worst.
Upvote for the excellent Wacraft II reference. Those are some of my favourite sound effects, and they are often quoted among my friends.

Here's all of them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gntGbsmTY_E
I tend to think the car comparison is cause for optimism. Prior to mass car ownership you would assume that such things in the general population would be enormously more dangerous than they have proven to be.

We live with the dangerous aspects of cars as the utility they provide is so high. The same will prove true of AI.

Humanity also has a huge problem with the mortality of the species as a whole. At some point we will be extinct. Will we have evolved into something else before this? Or will we choose to replace ourselves with machines? It is a valid choice to make in the face of changing circumstances which will occur no matter what we do.
It 100% is though, unironically.
I dunno, I'd maybe wait for the European Commission and FTC to finish scrutinizing over America's cash cows like Google and Apple before jumping to conclusions about success. If it turns out that both companies are criminally irresponsible with their power, then maybe Europe is comparatively better at regulation than the United States.

Without a reasonable and accountable standard of good state-capitalist relations, I don't know how we can even reach a conclusion yet. Today you're evil for scrutinizing Google; after they lose their AdSense antitrust case, maybe you'll be a consummate hero for the same deed.
#6

Face to face communication as opposed to asynchronous communication brings less objectivity to the topic at hand.
You still gotta call the tunes, though. Leadership vacuum is a real thing that can cause a lot of damage.
Second example from the repository:

//example2.escad -- A rounded union of a square and a circle.
union(r=14) {
square([80,80]);
translate ([80,80]) circle(30);
}

https://github.com/Haskell-Things/ImplicitCAD
And if that’s true, it suggests that the notion of continuous exponential human growth is nonsense.

hmm..a smaller exponent is still exponential growth