skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Google.

The perverse ad incentives is what broke it.
Now that you mention it, OpenSCAD makes a sound when it's done rendering which I find very helpful. Sometimes it takes several minutes and I usually want to queue up a print right when it's done.
How to spot Generative AI? (even if it has all 10 fingers and toes) [video]
Personally, not BTS.

But even just looking at the current charts for this week, Brat by Charli XCX, Romance by Fontaines DC and Woof by Fat Dog are all fantastic albums. Surprisingly, David Gilmour has a new album that’s at #1.
Hi, respectfully, you do not appear to understand how networking works.

> https://github.com/nyxpsi/nyxpsi/blob/bbe84472aa2f92e1e82103...

This is not how you "simulate packet loss". You are not "dropping TCP packets". You are never giving your data to the TCP stack in the first place.

UDP is incomparable to TCP. Your protocol is incomparable to TCP. Your entire benchmark is misguided and quite frankly irrelevant.

As far as I can tell, absolutely no attempt is made whatsoever to retransmit lost packets. Any sporadic failure (for example, wifi dropout for 5 seconds) will result in catastrophic data loss. I do not see any connection logic, so your protocol cannot distinguish between connections other than hoping that ports are never reused.

Have you considered spending less time on branding and more time on technical matters? Or was this supposed to be a troll?

edit: There's no congestion control nor pacing. Every packet is sent as fast as possible. The "protocol" is entirely incapable of streaming operation, and hence message order is not even considered. The entire project is just a thin wrapper over the raptorq crate. Why even bother comparing this to TCP?
> 2010-2015 rates were zero but no tech boom

?
There's a clear argument to be made that technical capability circumscribes commercial possibility.

Without active arbitrary code running on behalf of websites, control would be substantially tilted in favor of user clients.

There was probably no future where AJAX didn't evolve, but if it hadn't then things would look different.
Yeah, but it wouldn't be getting seized at a FedEx distribution center if it weren't an envelope of cash.
Aren't all computations inherently serial?

No. "inherently serial" refers to problems that are specified serially and can't be spend up by parallel processing. The sum of a set of N numbers is an example of a problem that is not inherently serial. You can use parallel reduction to perform the computation in O(log(N)) time on an idealized parallel computer but it takes O(N) time on an idealized serial computer.

And, it turns, exactly which problems are really are inherently serial is somewhat challenging problem.
It said in the article; drugs.
You better have your $5 wrench available to get access though. It's not like they can just take the briefcase or duffel bag full of crypto away from you.
Two things come to mind:

First, I'd make sure you are very familiar with the requirements for medical- and drug-adjacent apps in iOS. These rules are enforced haphazardly so be prepared to have to justify your app upon submission or updating.

Second, hand-written prescriptions are not much longer for this world so I'd consider the OCR part just a hook to get started and some initial traction - but you'll definitely need to find something sustainable.

> 1.4.2 Drug dosage calculators must come from the drug manufacturer, a hospital, university, health insurance company, pharmacy or other approved entity, or receive approval by the FDA or one of its international counterparts. Given the potential harm to patients, we need to be sure that the app will be supported and updated over the long term.

> 5.1.3 (i) Apps may not use or disclose to third parties data gathered in the health, fitness, and medical research context—including from the Clinical Health Records API, HealthKit API, Motion and Fitness, MovementDisorder APIs, or health-related human subject research—for advertising, marketing, or other use-based data mining purposes other than improving health management, or for the purpose of health research, and then only with permission. Apps may, however, use a user’s health or fitness data to provide a benefit directly to that user (such as a reduced insurance premium), provided that the app is submitted by the entity providing the benefit, and the data is not shared with a third party. You must disclose the specific health data that you are collecting from the device.

https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/
The banks are required to report cash transactions in excess of $10K. They don't have a choice and likely would not if it was up to them.
which resulted in internal conflict that led to the current state of affairs.

The "current state of affairs" is due entirely to Putin's conscious decision to invade, starting in 2014, in the total absence of any meaningful threat to Russia's security.

Not due to anything happening inside Ukraine, or anything the US supposedly did or did not do there.
OpenSearch is now part of the Linux foundation
I do not believe the civil forfeiture flow as is, is correct. And beyond that, having LE even know about the money... I don't know how that works.

Having said all that, sending cash through the mail just feels like a really obvious money laundering vector. You might claim that there's no distinction between that and, say, handing over a bunch of cash directly to a person, but in the world of money laundering each extra layer makes the operation safer!

I don't think that from this it follows that we should be opening envelopes all over, but there's a universe where the seller of jewelry is very aware that they are taken illicit cash, and in a a more just universe there's some sort of warrant.

I do not know how to square the privacy question with this, but I do like the idea of money laundering not being trivially doable.
then to have the right precedent set.... There's a big assumption that natural justice will prevail.
Civil forfeiture is fucking bullshit and should not be legal. Cops steal more money from Americans than burglars do.
In virtually every dev environment, the overwhelming majority of queries are most straightforwardly written in a way that doesn't admit to SQLI. It's not really a programming language thing.
> The actual result of the paper is that any poly-time computable function can be computed with poly-many tokens.

You're right.

Re: NAND of two inputs. Isn't this doable even by a single layer (no hidden layers) neural network?

Re: Polynomial computable function. I'm assuming this makes no assumption of constant-depth.

Because my entire point was that the result of this paper is not actually impressive AND covered by a previous paper. Hopefully that's clearer.
Had me until the end. I haven’t seen the friction? Let’s Encrypt and web 1.0 still work and domains are cheap. OpenBSD’s httpd is great for this job. You’ll exclude less people if you don’t require any features. You can still give your site out on big platforms or use a QR code.
Users of open social networks can directly transfer value now, with KYC at the on and off-ramps. Telegram was closest to implementing it into a very large and permissive network with open clients, albeit centralized and closed servers, though we’ll see how Durov’s French situation develops now.
Chicago Near North Side to Loop is 15 minutes by bike or bus, 10 by car. A quick skim on Zillow puts most of the 1-bed-1-bath units for sale in the 200-300k range.
I think a large part of it is the balkanization of the internet into multiple opaque walled gardens. You can’t find anything, or freely join communities to exchange information anymore because everything is locked away behind some search engine blocking login.

Discussion moved from public, open bulletin boards, forums, and similar to Facebook groups, discord, etc. It’s locked away, unindexable, and unfindable. Even Twitter clammed up recently. So the only thing left searchable is auto-generated clickbait. While FB, and friends are optimizing engagement by nursing misery behind their login walls.

The only growing public forum left is Reddit which is why more of us keep adding “site:Reddit.com” to our search queries to surface quality results. And even Reddit has threatened to close off.
> Once you have bureaucracy, you’ve lost the benefits of implicit communication. A large firm must thus either lose that culture entirely or constrain it to the top of the firm: elite group of fewer than 150 people, often much fewer, who have the flexibility to operate outside the bureaucracy and the camaraderie to trust each other with that power. (Or, again, pure fucking chaos. Almost every generation has shining examples of business leaders who want a big workforce with no bureaucracy.)

> The former, bureaucracy all the way down, is conventional corporate management. This is where unions found their footing. The second, bureaucracy except at the top, is the “modern” way. (“Founder mode.”) It, more than traditional management, screams for unionisation because it explicitly creates a two-tier culture where agency is reserved to one side.

This was helpful. Thank you. I have some more thoughts, but I don’t think it’s appropriate to push this topic further given the divergence from the original post.

> Note that I do not believe in antagonistic unions.

I’ve always gotten the vibe that unions are inherently antagonistic, but that’s just my view as an outsider who’s never had to deal with one personally, so I could be entirely wrong about that.
All contraband dogs are trained to alert on cash.
Enabling the `envfs` service fixes the bash shebang issue `services.envfs.enable = true;`

Disclosure: I don't know if this has any downsides, I haven't run into any
I'm assuming you're getting downvoted for your tone, but your technical points are spot on.
All big private shippers have a close relationship with police. USPS, since it's government owned, they have to have a warrant to open your packages. Private shippers just give permission. Don't ask me how things got so backwards, it makes no sense to me, I never gave UPS ownership of my property in transit, but somehow they can give permission outside legal procedure to search my property.

You ever wondered why, you can't ship cape products through USPS for example due to an executive order, but UPS and FedEx also won't let you do it? Did you know that they created that rule the same moment the executive order was signed, independently? Strange world we live in.
"Always succeeds" is up to the DM's interpretation.

Rather than "destroy sauron's ring", it's more like "you dislodge a mysterious gold coin that was stuck to the bottom of the table".
We can agree to disagree. The decision is ultimately up to the country.
And the money in this case was probably drug money. Who else buys gold chains for cash in that amount and sends it in a box via FedEx? But, it should be the burden of the state to prove it, not seize it based on suspicion.
"hardware startups that have to raise a lot of money before a Series A are... considerably riskier, no?"

Why riskier? They have more of a moat don't they? The large capitalization needed suggests they will face less competition. It's more difficult for competitors to gather the necessary capital to compete against them?

What I've written here was the conventional wisdom for most of 200 years. Much of the Industrial Revolution played out when merely concentrating together capital was seen as an engine of growth. Rockefeller did not need to sell innovative gasoline, he only needed to use cash flow to buy up monopoly positions, one small region at a time, until he had the cash flow to buy up monopoly positions nationwide. Economies-of-scale meant that merely concentrating together capital was a path to greater profitability.

The last 25 years were an aberration, during which time big companies could be built with small initial investments. But over the course of centuries, the opposite was more common.
> nobody cares what the coin conversion is

TBF, that particular data-point tends to have a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" extrapolation, ex:

1. "If sellers only care about what regular currency it can be turned into, that means it has failed as a currency because it's just an intermediate payment scheme."

2. "If sellers don't care about what regular currency it can become, that probably means it has failed as a currency because it's really just a speculative-bubble asset."
How does that kind of competition settle disputes that lead to wars?
Its been like that since the drug war. Any large amount of cash is seized whenever it is found and considered the procedes of criminal activities unless you can definitively prove that that exact pile of cash had zero involvement in any past crime or future crime.
Estimating Breathing Disturbances and Sleep Apnea Risk from Apple Watch [pdf]
> We are moving past the “Airbnb for dogs” era and into the “build a better quantum computer” era.

I disagree. Most software still sucks for the average user.

Every app comes with its own nickel-and-dime subscription fee. You want to make a photo collage of your dog? That's $10/mo for PHOTO COLLAGE PRO, thanks.

You want to have a nice team-wide issue tracker / project planner? That's $12/user/mo, and contact our sales team if you need data security.

Using our free tier? No problem, please enjoy as we use our /alternative means/ to monetize you. Feel free to watch this ad while you chew on whatever that means.

..all this to say, there is still very much an opportunity for a software race-to-the-bottom, where people provide equal or better value to users, for equal or less monies. Pick any business, and you can do this too, as long as it is not a market where the leader is operating at a loss for dominance and as long as your execution is good enough.
I know how to square the privacy question with this, and you do too.

Money laundering is trivial regardless.
Here is a very good summary from Youtube on "The Minority Rule" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwlW2aamDFc;

The Minority Rule, often associated with Nassim Nicholas Taleb, refers to a principle in which a small, intransigent minority can have a disproportionate impact on the behavior of a larger group, eventually leading the majority to adopt the preferences or practices of that minority. This occurs because the minority is highly committed to a particular preference or practice and is unwilling to compromise, while the majority is more flexible and willing to accommodate the minority's demands to avoid conflict or inconvenience.

Key Points of the Minority Rule:

Intransigence: The minority is unwavering in its position and refuses to accept alternatives.

Flexibility of the Majority: The majority is more flexible and often prefers to avoid confrontation or inconvenience, leading them to adopt the minority's preference.

Asymmetric Impact: Even though the minority is smaller, its rigid stance can lead to a situation where the majority conforms to the minority's preferences.

Examples:

Cultural Practices: In a mixed group, if a small number of individuals strictly follow a particular dietary rule (e.g., kosher or halal), the larger group might choose to accommodate these restrictions, leading to everyone adopting the more restrictive practice.

Regulations and Standards: Sometimes, a regulation or standard that applies to a small subset of people (e.g., accessibility requirements) becomes the norm for everyone because it’s easier or more efficient to have a single standard.

Implications:
The minority rule highlights how committed minorities can exert significant influence over larger groups, often shaping social norms, practices, and even laws. This can be both positive (e.g., ensuring certain ethical standards) and negative (e.g., stifling diversity of thought or practice).
I've been playing with o1 on known kernel LPEs (a drum I've been beating is how good OpenAI's models are with Linux kernel stuff, which I assume is because there is such a wealth of context to pull from places like LKML) and it's been very hit-or-miss. In fact, it's actually pretty SAST†-like in its results: some handwavy general concerns, but needs extra prompting for the real stuff.

The training datasets here also seem pretty small, by comparison? "Hundreds of closed source projects we own"?

It'd be interesting to see if it works well. This is an easy product to prove: just generate a bunch of CVEs from open source code.

† SAST is enterprise security dork code for "security linter"
The other problem is Intel's graphics drivers for 3d gaming are a distant 3rd place. Games just haven't historically targeted their GPUs. We've had like 2 decades of games that for the most part have tested compatibility with Nvidia and AMD.
It’s not quite so clear cut. From Wikipedia:

> These attempts at limiting the content of the mail were upheld by the Supreme Court, but in the 20th century, the Court took a more assertive approach in striking down postal laws which limited free expression, particularly as it related to political materials.[7][8] The First Amendment thus provided a check on the Postal Power.

And SCOTUS these days also tends to equate cash as a form of political speech. Of course mailing cash is a bit different than mailing political materials but you could make the case that it’s part of a political organizing campaign or payment for political materials. And mailing cash itself through the USPS is actually perfectly legal as long as it’s for a legal purpose.
> There's no public transit in many places because Americans don't want it and don't support it

Yes, exactly. This is not a bug, it's a feature.
Magicpatterns.com. It's similar to v0.dev but seems to just produce better looking UI.

Midjourney for stock images, or branded content. Sometimes it's even useful for icons.
Euromaidan was a response to the old regime being corrupt and collapsing. The only allegiance was to self enrichment.
The Core line (2006), when they started to swing back away from “make fast furnaces” was just one year before the iPhone (2007). So the NetBurst debacle had already happened.

But that was desktops. I wonder if they really realized how much a problem that was in mobile. I also think I remember a discussion of that quote from a few weeks ago where someone said the real problem for Intel in the iPhone wasn’t heat but power draw.

I don’t think they ever really got the religion. Apple’s M1 sort of seems like a repeat of this whole thing. Intel still didn’t get it at that point. Still too hot. Still not efficient enough.

The switch from NetBurst to Core seems more like a direction switch because they hit a wall, not a recognition of what the problem actually was. A change from ultra-fast single core to fast multi-core.
There is history before 2022.
I have scripts that run in the background to check for the health status of some systems I am monitoring. I use a program to display results on my wallpaper and I trigger a "say" command if it fails.

I also commonly use a "say" command to just get notified when a long running command is done.
"Aggressive" processes that for one reason or another escape well-mannered foreground supervision; for example, often those that daemonize themselves incorrectly. Either they don't generate PID files correctly, or they don't cleanup after old PID files leaving them dangling, or they have useless PID files that point to the incorrect child processes that can't do useful work when they receive signals to reload/shutdown themselves safely.

Handling those daemons by jailing them with Linux-centric cgroups is the one thing systemd allows you to "get away with".
My biggest gripes are definitely within the mines and relationships, but there’s also a general feeling of, I guess best described as urgency, I feel in SD but not in FOMT.

The mines are an easy target to pick on, and I understand why it is like this. The game is first and foremost an indie farming sim, and as someone who really enjoys action JRPGs (having grown up on Summon Night: Swordcraft Story) I was thoroughly dissatisfied with the mines. It’s essentially pre-1.12 Minecraft combat (aka spam clicking) against the same 5 enemies, breaking rocks to either get to the nth floor or collect enough of whatever resource to get out and do something more productive. I understand that making it more in-depth would pull the lone dev’s resources from other things and may not even be an interest for them, let alone the mostly casual players, but still a critique I will field.

Probably bigger to me is the relationships. I adore most of the characters, and especially Penny and Sam. It makes romance delightfully difficult when your preferred partner gets with your favorite guy, but that brings me to the problem with the base game. I can’t have a best friend. I want to get full hearts on people without it being strictly romantic, and I am thankful there are so many mods that do touch on this.

Finally, as for urgency, it’s really hard to describe and I’m not sure if it’s the right term. I just feel pressured in SD in ways I don’t in FOMT. Pressured to focus on the game, to plan my time around the game rather than picking it up, playing for the time allotted during a break, and then quicksaving for later. I feel pressured to be profitable, to be efficient, and to be social on top of that. It’s been a good few months since I’ve played FOMT, I admit, while SD was only a few weeks ago, so it may be revealing to play it again and see if I can deduce where these feelings originate.
> I hope this doesn't come off as patronizing, but I just wanted to send you an appreciation for the tone of curiosity and openness you've set in your posts here: your post and JumpCrisscross' comments were some of the most insightful ones in this page.

That’s not patronizing. Thank you.

Honestly, I expected to simply be dunked on and downvoted into a dead comment, so I think it’s great that there are at least some folks who are willing to engage in good faith and have the conversations most would rather not have! That’s how we all grow.
The people who are there to solve interesting problems quit [0]. The people who are there for the cash stay.

The vast majority of any large organisation are in the second category, so your statement is 100% correct.

Whether the organisation loses something because the first category leaves, is open to debate. I think they would.

[0] because they now have the experience (and option at other organisations) of working from home full-time, which reduces their exposure to corporate bullshit and pointless meetings.
There's been places where capital is the main issue. Like Chinese SEZs attracting foreign capital with low regulation, low labor costs, cheap land, etc.
Why not just make an EPUB version of your website?
Show HN: I Made A Web-Based 2.5D Animation Editor
made it specifically for 2.5D/parallax animations has some custom workflows that make it easy to layer images and animate
Something that I think is interesting is how instrumental limitations defined 80's synth pop, making it a very distinctive era of starkly composed music. We'll likely never have that kind of limitation-defined era again.
> Scale enough compute for 1 million AGI and we can solve quantum gravity in a year.

That is wrong, it misses the point. We learn from the environment, we don't secrete quantum gravity from our pure brains. It's a RL setting of exploration and exploitation, a search process in the space of ideas based on validation in reality. A LLM alone is like a human locked away in a cell, with no access to test ideas.

If you take child Einstein and put him on a remote island, and come back 30 years later, do you think he would impress you with is deep insights? It's not the brain alone that made Einstein so smart. It's also his environment that had a major contribution.
Discussion (175 points, 7 days ago, 164 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41490921