skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Because the author specifically mentioned that it's worthless because it's 'right-wing' (a 'right-wing cesspool'), as if there aren't plenty of people espousing left-wing views on the platform. The right-wing comment in particular is what makes the statement blatantly partisan.
I think if you read LinkedIn posts you get what you deserve
yeah we live rural with two teens, so no car isn't much of an option but I'm thinking I'll just buy a cheap used ICE to tide me over until interest rates drop and I can save some $$ and go buy a new EV :-(

had my eye on a used polestar 2 or mustang mach-e, but not sure I can justify debt for that
Also it breaks the languagr barreer, you can now read the Chinese internet if you want, or chat transparently in Arabic. That's going to be interesting.
Nintendo and Pokémon are suing Palworld maker Pocketpair
Indeed nowadays killing an animal is hidden behind industrial vail.

Unfortunately, it also normalized and further desensitivied us to the topic.

Though I'm quite happy to see that eating sentient beings gets out of fashion, at least in developed world.
Microsoft Optimizes Hyper-V Code to Boot Linux Faster When Having Many CPUs
Hahaha, this comment has me thinking about how I would pronounce it. Bee-yok? Bye-yolk?
If you don't "trade in" you can switch to Apple's CIT-backed financing that then Apple runs a single financing with an annual device refresh+trade-in tied to an annual financing refresh at the same monthly rate.

(If you trade in, starting this is not among their offers. Perhaps the deal term or finance amount is too low to make the economics work, or more likely, would confuse consumers at the one year mark when the payments needed to go up.)
Unveiling the Multifunctional Carbon Fiber Structural Battery
With or without the apparent misidentification of authorship, it is not clear to me what could be seen as circular here.
You don't find a difference between things that exist and things that don't?
I can't claim that I have any idea of how this model is built, but from their shifty excuses touching on "alignment" I'm confident that o1 is actually two copies of the same model, one "raw" and unchained that is fine-tuned for CoT, and one that has been crippled for safety and human alignment to parse that and provide the actual reply. They have finally realized how detrimental the "lobotomizing" process is to the models general reasoning, and this is their solution. It makes sense that they are afraid to unleash that onto the world, but we've already seen the third "filter" model that summarizes the thoughts to slip some of that through (just yesterday it was seen to have "emotional turmoil" as one of the reasoning steps), so it's just a matter of time before it makes something crazy slip through.
> Consolidate step 2 and 3 into one and cut it down from 4 hours to 1 or you’ll have a lot of people “fail” because they don’t want their time wasted

That’s not been our experience at at all. We did not have a single candidate drop out of their own accord. Our interview process is not long and the coding is minimal (most the people we hired finished in less than half the allotted time, even that can be attributed to stress, these aren’t hard tests).

> usually companies pay for extensive tests with programming

2hrs of coding is not “extensive” by any stretch of the imagination. This isn’t a 4-8hr+ take home test.

> You can still kick people out during their trial period even in countries with strict labor laws too.

Spoken like someone who has never hired/managed. Firing, even with cause, is never quite so simple. I’ll gladly take a couple hours (HOURS! You act like I’m asking for weeks of people’s time) to confirm they will be a good fit upfront instead of going through the onboarding and off-boarding hassle. Not to mention it’s a super asshole move to hire people that are considering letting go just because it makes for an easier interviewing process. Honestly that’s kind of fucked up, especially if they are leaving another job to come work for you. I would absolutely fire someone new if they lied or if their work ethic did not match what they said/did in the interview process (probably after a couple warnings) but hiring with a high chance of firing? No, I won’t do that just to save a couple of hours upfront.
So in the very near future it looks like we'll have the logistics capability to ship 100-150 tons to the moon every 6 months, at a conservative start.

So quick computation: 5 trips is 2 and a half years, and then shipping supplies and then people another year or so. At 100-150 tons per year you can supply (back of envelope[1]) 10-20 'overwinterers'[2] with a fairly comfortable margin for a year, as well as equipment and parts.

There's also no technical reason not to reserve a landing pad for an escape craft that you can rotate every 6-12 months.

So it seems like the technical capability will be there at least. Then it becomes the question of whether that's financially viable already.

Can you elucidate further logistical challenges?

(ps. this post will likely date quickly, since NASA seems to be planning an actual Artemis Base Camp [3])

[1] Back of envelope suggests something like 3 tons of essential supplies needed per person, assuming the modest oxygen and water recycling as available on ISS, and use of nuclear power.

[2] By analogy with the arctic base: 10-20 permanent crew for year-round maintenance, with occasional surges 'on season', bringing their own supplies and equipment.

[3] https://www.nasa.gov/humans-in-space/nasas-artemis-base-camp...
Could you be more vague? That would be great.
They use generics because they are available now, otherwise most likely they would be magic functions like before.
Do you have an example of a weapon of war that is more surgical? I think this is the typical Israel criticism that is devoid of any realistic basic to be honest.
you are assuming i have users and this is a mail server not a website which has a very different access pattern more analogous to ssh where TOFU works beautifully.
I'm not aware of any studies on this, Nvidia did do a study on the effect of sensitivity on aiming [0] but I'm afraid it didn't cover acceleration. Imo it very well could be given how many top aimers and pro players have successfully used configurable mouse acceleration solutions like RawAccel, InterAccel, Povohat's and Quake built-in acceleration. I feel like aiming with acceleration has a steeper learning curve though especially with steeper acceleration curves without an offset, so perhaps I still wouldn't slap default windows acceleration at newer players.

[0] https://research.nvidia.com/publication/2022-08_mouse-sensit...
Yup, when we rework BGA boards it's sufficient to go off the silkscreen outline of the package, if the board has one.

Also the cool-down BGA effect they showed is a lead-free thing, you don't see that on leaded solder balls unless something is wrong.
openai is yahoo in ten years, change my mind
ADHD headband treats symptoms in 20 minutes per day
I did read it :) not sure how that line applies here, can you expand?
Defense of Taiwan is very important for the sort od reasons you're talking about. The defense of Israel though? That's a net negative which causes America a great deal of reputational harm around the world. With regard to Europe taking their own defense industry seriously again, I think that is ultimately a good thing for the American public, and in any case isn't caused by the trend of younger Americans disliking Israel. Rather, it is caused particularly by a certain baby boomer presidential candidate who simultaneously suggests that America shouldn't oppose Putin invading Europe AND that America should instead triple down on support for Israel.

As for people going "further right" as they get older, the younger American generations disliking Israel isn't a right/left thing. Young right and young left both dislike Israel, for their own reasons. Churches in America, particularly white evangelical churches from whom support for Israel is the strongest, are in a precipitous decline. They look like nursing homes now, younger generations aren't coming back and the boomers in those churches are in a panic over it.
If you are using vs code, it has an extension: find unused exports. It worked so far pretty well in our projects.

https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=iulian-r...
FizzBee, TLA+, and (Practical) Formal Software Verification with JP Kadarkarai
Why are you referring to Israel with its name in quotation marks?
Serious question, serious answer: only camera low light and lens upgrades unless you're trying to run last year's AAA mobile games. Arguably no other differences are particularly noticeable -- other than the "always on" screen and mag-safe mounting + charging.

Something you're probably not missing: SIM slots. The new models, in the US, are missing SIM slots.
Hezbollah does exist to attack Israel, why would it matter that they are "pissed off"?

It is a militia. Sure, they also now formed a political party, but that doesn't really hide what their goals are.
Indeed, the only common issue we have on BGA rework is bridged balls. If it's on the edge and it's a larger BGA, we can often wick it out with desoldering braid, cut up some fine solder wire, push it under, and "reball" it in-place. If it's on an inner row you're removing the BGA.
> Only thing required for this setup to work: client needs to be able to resolve domain to internal ip.

It does not. Use DNS validation, that way you can issue LE certs for individual domains as well as wildcard certificates without needing to expose anything anywhere other than a CNAME record for the validation.
You could even meet your future AI girlfriend there.
Having grown up with US skate culture I was surprised to see soviet-era Odessa skaters doing two-person tricks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7KV4E4ZvsM&t=68s

(I've done pas de deux's in other disciplines, and it's always taken me way more practice to polish a routine involving more than one set of wetware than it does to polish a solo performance)
Just fine. It was a total non-issue! I slept fine before, but now I’m not gonna give myself a stroke or heart attack.
You will be surprised how many used US cars are exported overseas.
Thanks! It went well.
Lenovo Yoga with 'Lunar Lake' chip smokes M3 MacBook Air in battery life test
I've tried Operator Mono, SF Mono, Ubuntu, Roboto, Consolas etc.
Switched daily, weekly, monthly..

But I've been using Comic Mono for 2 years now (SW developer) and forgot all about it. The mark of a truly great font.
> The words "probably nothing" imply that on something more than belief, you can assign a probability to nothingness.

Maybe not "probability", but likelihood. That's the way Ockham's razor cuts: In the total absence of evidence for any continuation, there is no sensible reason to assume the existence of it.

> Wanting to avoid that change is almost definitionally due to a fear of the unknown. You are afraid that the new state you will be in will be worse for lack of those memories.

No, you only need to know that that won't be you who is in whatever state that whoever-it-is will be in. Our memories is who we are. No need to feel fear on behalf of whoever that will be that you're talking about.
Instead of the sound clues triggering every minute, it may trigger on arrival of the person wearing RF ID or phone.
> I remember reading the font is similar to the letters that are taught in kindergarten which is a theory of why it's easy on the eyes.

I know some people find it easier to read, but that explanation does not seem right to me. For one thing are kids not taught to read using printed materials? I taught my kids to read using whole words - flash cards and then "look and say" books and those did not use fonts anything like this.

I personally find it hard to read and it slows me down slightly. I wonder whether some people benefit from being slowed down? Maybe making their eye movements more deliberate or efficient?
Was Tor ever safe to use?
I don't think so.
garbage in, garbage out ?
There was a recent HN topic where person running exit nodes run into quite a lot of issues because of it.
I was ready to laugh, but instead I felt peacefull. There's a remarkable serenity to this font.
But not all traffic goes to onion sites.
Again, why is there an expectation for a company to do X and not Y with data you give them for free? They can do pretty much anything they want including not securing it. As nearly every single US company does.
Science publications until 1955 may be last ones not contaminated by calculators.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34966335

We will all get used to it.
In 2021 they had 600m in revenue and spent 199m on software development. I am not sure if they break software development out to Firefox and all the other things (eg. Pocket).

So at least in 2021 at best it was 30% of revenue on developing Firefox. They spent 30m on marketing and branding.

https://assets.mozilla.net/annualreport/2021/mozilla-fdn-202...
Yeah that's true if you have a reflow oven and avoid 0402 and below. Ovens aren't cheap or small though.
> For those who aren't aware it's a 25% tarrif, so most manufacturers don't bother even trying to sell in the US. That's why almost all European/Japanese brand cars are 30+ years old over there.

BMW has a 23.000-employee plant in South Carolina that produces X model SUVs for the entire world [1]. Volkswagen has an even larger presence [2]. No tariffs apply on these.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_in_the_United_States

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Group_of_America
Code review for statisticians, data scientists and modelers
OpenTelemetry Context Propagation in FerretDB
We use multiple M1 airs as dev machines and they're all still working perfectly fine and very fast, nothing has broken, on top of that they were all bought used. We're not looking to replace them any time soon. Not an Apple fanatic personally (don't own a single iProduct), but the M series of laptops is extremely well built and performant. I expect them to last at least 6 years from time of purchase.
If you don't want them to train models with the data you give them, don't give them data. They should be able to train whatever they want with it without regulation and there's no reason to request permission.
>> The required apps are unreliable and annoying.

The requirement of an app to fuel a car is ridiculous and is one of the largest barriers for many people. Too much of our lives are already dependent on our phones. The idea that any random issue with my phone will then cause my car to not work ... that is just unacceptable. This is why airplanes don't have keys, let alone apps.

(My secure work phone is currently bricked due to an issue with my email address being moving between departments. That sort of thing is why I would never trust a phone for vital things like fueling a vehicle.)
I think that’s a bit of a stretch to say go will implement all the features of c# and Java because of a few new features. Go isn’t a frozen language, they just take a lot of time and discussion before committing to a major change.
safe as it ever was
Devs just love reinventing the wheel every few years. Maybe we should switch to CSV next just for fun.
I thought of that too! Love it.

The version I like best is:

Aliens arrive on earth and visit various people. The first religious leader they meet is the Pope "Do you know our lord and saviour Jesus Christ?".

"Yes, he comes by every few years".

"Every few years? We have been waiting two thousand years for him to come back!"

"Maybe he does not like your chocolates"

"What do chocolates have to do with it?"

"When he first visited us we gave him a big box of chocolates. What did you do?"
Here's when:

https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/RealTimeKerne...

> Security Implications

> All it would take is one malicious process to execute and take advantage of the real-time code to completely lock-out a user from their machine, turning that machine into part of a botnet or other malicious purpose. Real-Time processes have the potential to completely take-over a machine. This is the number one reason Ubuntu does not carry a Real-Time kernel.
Welcome to the Golden Age of Scams
you have the truth - it was cooked up by US Naval Intelligence - why would you think it was safe?
probably already is, and doesn't know it.
The patent process is slow but not a fixed time. It's variable.

If the variability in time-to-patent exceeds the delta between independent inventions you no longer have a fair system.

At best you're randomly rewarding the patent to one lucky inventor. At worst you're rewarding it to the one who is best able to game the patent system, encouraging corruption throughout.
Please spend some time reading this whole thread to understand better my arguments. Your question is based on flawed logic and does not require an answer in context of what’s going on.
Title should read: “LinkedIn is now using everyone’s ‘content’ to train their AI tool”
> Firstly, an "earth centred" cosmology did not assume all things were made for man.

Well, this one has sent me down a bit of a rabbit hole. In a previous life I was in relatively close academic proximity to Patricia Fara (author of OP). I doubt she'd make such a claim lightly. So I started chasing citations.

OP states at the start of the "Analogy and Conjecture" section:

> Earth-centred cosmologies had assumed that the universe had been designed specifically for human beings, but Newtonian modernisers deemed that it was only ‘according to the old vulgar Opinion, that all things were made for man’.

This passage looks to be carried over from a 2004 paper written by Fara [0]. The quotation "all things were made for man" is attributed to William Derham - an English clergyman, scientist, and contemporary of Newton - in a text titled "Astro-Theology" [1]. Derham's own reference for this is in fact another of his own texts titled "Physico-Theology" [2], in which he states:

> This was no very eafy queſtion to be anſwered by fuch as held, that all things were made for man ; as moſt of the ancients did ; as Ariftotle, Seneca, Cicero, and Pliny ( to name only fome of the chief) . And Cicero cites it as the celebrated Chryfippus's opinion, Præclarè enim Chryfippus, cætera nata eſſe bo- minum causâ, & deorum. " For Chryfippus rightly judged that all things were created for man and for the Gods."-De fin. bon. & mal. 1. 3. And in his De Nat. Deor. 1. 2. fin. he ſeri- riouſly proves the world itſelf to have been made for the Gods and man, and all things in the world to have been made and contrived for the benefit of man (parata , & inventa ad fructum hominum, are his words ) . So Pliny in his preface to his 7th book faith, Nature made all things for man ; but then he makes a doubt, whether the fhewed herſelf a more indulgent parent, or cruel ftep-mother, as in book iv. chap. 12. note 2. But fince the works of God have been more diſcovered, and the limits of the Univerfe have been found to be of infinitely greater extent than the ancients ſuppoſed them ; this narrow opinion hath been exploded. And the anfwer will be found cafy to theſe queſtions, Why fo many ufelefs creatures ? In the Heavens, Why fo many fix'd ftars, and the greateſt part of them ſcarce vifible ? Why fuch fyftems of planets, as in Jupiter, Saturn, & c. ( See my Aftro-Theology. ) In the earth and waters, Why fo many creatures of no ufe to man ?

It looks to me like Derham makes a pretty good case here for Fara's claim, at least in "most" of the ancient cosmologies.

[0] "Heavenly bodies: Newtonianism, natural theology and the plurality of worlds debate in the eighteenth century", p.149. https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/2004JHA....35..143...

[1] "Astro-theology Or a Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God, from a Survey of the Heavens", Book 2, Chap 2, p.18. https://books.google.co.uk/books?redir_esc=y&hl=fr&id=GpjG22...

[2] "Physico-theology Or, A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God, from His Works of Creation", Book 2, Chap 6, p.5. https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Physico_theology/Ouk_...
But tbh "better" is subjective here. Does the new LLM improve user interactions significantly? Seems like people get obsessed with shiny new models without asking if it’s actually adding value.
There are people living in space stations right now? Are you saying rockets are fake or do you mean that we don't have any permanent habitats on other planets?

E.g. https://whoisinspace.com/
So, materiel that doesn't really exist?

And rayon doesn't exactly have a good history.

I'm all for looking for better things. Will be hard to replace some stuff, though.
> A closer analogy would be saying the Ph.D candidate must be issued the degree unless a randomly chosen undergraduate can show the research wasn't sufficiently novel.

That's not correct: Patent examiners are hired for their technical background, they're put through a four-month academy that includes their technical areas, and they get regular refresher training in recent developments by attendance at industry conferences, etc.

https://2017-2021.commerce.gov/americanworker/work-based-lea...
My main issue with Anthropic is that Amazon is an investor in anthropic. I would rather have far more ethical companies onboard. I know Microsoft is no angel but Amazon seems like the worse one. In my ideal world, Microsoft backs Anthropic and Amazon OpenAi.
Companies are never a “if you build it, they will come”-type of thing. You need sales/marketing/etc (and that can all be one person). Sometimes you can have engineer/sales/marketing/etc all in 1 person but it’s rare.

It’s incredibly common (in and outside of tech) to see someone who is really, really good at 1 (or more) things but sucks at other skills needed to run a successful business. A prime example is someone who can make amazing food but has no clue how to run the other aspect of a restaurant/food business. I have first-hard exposure to this phenomenon.

Maybe you don’t want to raise funds, maybe you don’t want to do sales, maybe you don’t want to talk to clients, maybe you don’t want to be alone in an echo chamber.

There are many valid reasons to partner with one or more people that don’t write code to form a company.

I run my own company, I do everything (some of it badly) and I’d absolutely entertain the idea of bringing on someone who enjoyed and was good at sales and managing clients. I can do both those things and I think I’m above average at it but I don’t enjoy doing it. It stresses me out and feels like a chore. I don’t want total isolation from my clients but I’d love a layer between us. Someone who can say “no” or “our platform doesn’t support that” without feeling stress or low-level guilt or agreeing to add features for free. Someone who enjoys reaching out to new perspective clients (all of mine essentially fell in my lap).

Bottom line good engineers often are not good at the other things needed to build a successful company.
The devices were very low yield and the vast majority of casualties were the members of Hezbollah network. Even most of those have lived. I don't see how it violates the conventions.
> You keep talking about the immoral yet explicitly legal practices of these companies

I did a search for “moral” in this thread’s history. I matched exactly once (twice with this one). That’s not “keep talking about”, that’s one mention. Even then it was a general point of not conflating legality with morality, it was not specific to this practice.

You’re ascribing preconceived notions from the straw man in your head, not my words. I thus point you to those same HN guidelines (I agree they are quite good).

> As long as those companies are engaging in legal activities, then the blame for how they engage with them goes to the regulators.

This, right there, encompasses the whole nature of our disagreement. This law prescribes several ways to comply and not be annoying to people. Thus if a company complies in an annoying way, it’s on them. It’s absurd to say that the blame for how you engage with a rules is on regulators. The text of the rule is on regulators, how someone engages with that text is on them.