skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hashlly is a user-friendly form builder designed by Ismail to make form creation easy and efficient. It features a drag-and-drop interface that allows anyone to build custom forms in minutes, without needing coding skills. Whether you need a simple contact form or a complex survey, Hashlly lets you design it effortlessly with live previews as you build.

One of Hashlly's standout features is its high level of customization. You can adjust colors, fonts, and even add conditional logic, making your forms dynamic based on user responses. Plus, if you need to collect payments, Hashlly integrates Stripe, allowing you to accept payments directly through your forms without needing third-party platforms.

Hashlly also includes an option to limit form submissions—perfect for managing special offers or exclusive events, ensuring that users can only submit once. The onboarding process is fun and engaging, with a gamified approach that gives users tasks and rewards them with progress tracking.

Unlike many tools that require monthly subscriptions, Hashlly offers a one-time payment for lifetime access, making it a smart, cost-effective solution for businesses and individuals alike. Simple, powerful, and easy to use, Hashlly is the perfect tool for all your form-building needs.
Is that a real catch, though? The intel chip requires good cooling too to perform well, doesn't it?

Maybe is the Apple's chip more limited in multithread tasks vs Intel's one
I recently discover explosive welding is a thing. It uses PETN packaged as a thin sheet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detasheet
Is there a monospaced version, or an inspired monospaced version based on this available?
You can use LSP?
You'll find plenty of experienced people in the industry that tell you not to worry about the law. Either, the company is too small for it to matter, or it is large enough to afford lawyers and lobbyists.

Given the acceptability of "saying the quiet part out loud" anymore, I'm sure you could find a famous tech guy expressing such sentiments.

Though, I'm sure those same people will throw a fit if they end up on the losing side of AI generated startups. Imagine an AI prompt that replaces and entire Oracle cluster with a self-hosted postgres one for a fraction of the cost.
I never said it would. Any engine needs 'basic platform support' style input. And going into extra windows/threads/apis is for 'competitive shooter titles'.

After working on one a bit I would say library way is not good enough :) but it is sure thing cost effective way to support a platform. Or even few platforms shared by same vendor.
I see your point. For me, the addiction is in the content, rather than the delivery mechanism. So I end up checking the site too often for what I want, which in this case was replies to my posts. Other sites like Twitter or LinkedIn tried to tempt me with their notifications and I never fell for it.
So apparently, it must be less than 20 g of RDX, and/or a weaker explosive: if the fatal distance was within 0.64 meters, there would be significantly more reported deaths.
Ordinary people can't do this because they missed the window, but also because their labor has a clear nexus. This scheme worked because when a product is designed in one locale, built in another, and sold in a third, there's some reasonable question of what the nexus of the income is.

Ordinary people that have written books or songs or otherwise earn royalties from creative works on a regular basis could probably have arranged for ownership of their royalties to be owned by a complex corporate structure as well, but I don't know that very many ordinary people earn enough in royalties that tax avoidance is worth the setup and maintenance costs.
Do you? Both posts linked above were made with full identity disclosure. Does it make anyone outside of a tiny minority that understands how media works more aware of the manipulation? Does this awareness make manipulation less effective?
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=58008
Which is pretty wild too, considering they're selling the product and the new OS came out yesterday.
You can run it locally, and it's really fast. But since YouTube transcription is really good, I don't see why you'd use Whisper and get a worse transcription (unless maybe it's on videos that Google did not transcribe for whatever reason).
Hawks. They're called hawks.
And they seem to have too high of a market cap for the Inception solution. "I just bought the airline. It seemed neater."
Messenger Kids was a pragmatic effort by Meta to improve safety on the Messenger platform. It works well, and it looks to me like Instagram Teen accounts is a similar effort. You can bemoan the effects of social media or whether teens should be there but the teens are there, so credit to Meta for making a serious investment.

Always lacking in these conversations is a proper definition of "social media". Kids want to talk to their friends, many want to be social, so if we're going to talk about the dangers of social media we need to be specific. E.g. the problems with algorythmic content are entirely different to the issues of bullying and inappropriate direct messaging. Conflating them under a "social media is bad" banner doesn't help us build healthier, safer systems.
Angband Live – Play and spectate Angband variants in browser
Nothing can beat HSR for distances of a few hundred kilometers. Not cars. Not airplanes.

For reference, Chicago to NYC is about the distance at which a high-speed train and a plane would make equal sense.
It's on Google Fonts so you can use their type tester:

https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Atkinson+Hyperlegible/test...
OK you just have to prevent it on OS level tbab. So the battery temperature doesn't go higher than a certain level.
I agree! I'm a Go programmer, and while I do wish it had some more features at times, Swift is an example of how it can easily go out of control and ruin a promising language.

For example tests, there's so much magic. How do I know it runs the test for each item in the arguments array? What if there were multiple arguments? After using Go for close to a decade now, I'm really seeing the wisdom of avoiding magic, and making your testing code the same language as your building code! Compare:

Swift:

@Test("Continents mentioned in videos", arguments: [
"A Beach",
"By the Lake",
"Camping in the Woods"
])
func mentionedContinents(videoName: String) async throws {
let videoLibrary = try await VideoLibrary()
let video = try #require(await videoLibrary.video(named: videoName))
#expect(video.mentionedContinents.count <= 3)
}

Go:

func TestMentionedContinents(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct{ Name string }{
{"A Beach"},
{"By the Lake"},
{"Camping in the Woods"},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
video, err := library.FindVideoByName(tt.Name)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("failed to get video: %v", err)
}
if len(video.MentionedContinents) > 3 {
t.Errorf("video %q mentions more than 3 continents", tt.Name)
}
}
}

Go with timeout handling in case the FindVideo function takes too long (idk Swift magic well enough to know if it'd do this automatically!)

func TestMentionedContinents(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct{ Name string }{
{"A Beach"},
{"By the Lake"},
{"Camping in the Woods"},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.Name, func(t *testing.T) {
ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), 30*time.Millisecond)
defer cancel()

video, err := library.FindVideoByName(ctx, tt.Name)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("failed to get video: %v", err)
}
if len(video.MentionedContinents) > 3 {
t.Errorf("video %q mentions more than 3 continents", tt.Name)
}
})
}
}
Did they test it ever worked with getaddrinfo? Or did they just see it worked once with CFNetwork and called it a day and then later publish a blog post saying it’s broken?
A word about systemd (2016)
Yes after 25 years this is how I see it. Isolate state into its little dirty corner, think in terms of data structure and its transformation. This has kept me sane for decades. It's simple but so many devs just haven't seen the light yet.
> maybe drive by wire car manufacturers could start adding a "oh crap" manual handle to physically disengage power and apply some type of physical friction brake

It depends on the manufacturer, but I think this is already the case with Tesla cars? The brake specifically isn't drive-by-wire, it's an electrically assisted hydraulic brake - so even if a malicious actor could get the car to not do the assist part anymore, you can still stop by pressing the pedal hard.

I feel like bollards and other form of separating roads from pedestrians are unviable on the large scale. I hope manufacturers start focusing more on sandboxing any internet-connected parts of their software and leaving the whole car-driving part inaccessible from any of that.
In my experience, different people care about different things. There's probably a bunch of things that you care about passionately that completely bore me.

I wouldn't worry about it. I definitely won't.
Rogue Deliveryman Tony Delivers Is Launching His Own App
> the compiler is asking me to help it out

Yeah, this sucks, but it's also mind-boggling. The SwiftUI body result builder returns "some View" which means the compiler has to infer the specific type that the function produces, as a complex combination of whatever different if/then and while loops, along with their transitive function applications and closure contexts (where the type inference can be outside-in instead of inside-out).

Then layer in in the @Observation macro magic for observing data types and re-building views when data changes, Swift Data pulling with fully typed predicates from a data store automatically replicated across devices....

It's like rocket thrusters from every angle, and pretty easy to start tumbling off the happy path.
Probabl
Very cool. Makes me think of this wonderful scene from Sports Night where William Macy talks about Philo Farnsworth and Cliff Gardner inventing TV.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-va0tWJLTc
C++ is sobbing in a corner I guess
Doing much more damage 50% of the time might be more effective, if an undirected explosion is too weak to kill anyone but a directed (and lucky) one could.
There is an article about this based on a Chris Lattner talk/links to previous HN discussions: https://danielchasehooper.com/posts/why-swift-is-slow/
The unqualified imports are definitely a major pain point. In a large Swift app I find myself having to be eternally vigilant organizing my files so that I'm not dumping surprises into the import site.

Makes me appreciate how even Node.js got it right so early on.
> with raw costs.

You've mistaken my point about "total cost of customer" for "raw cost of materials."

The "top brands" probably do marketing. That costs. They probably have better supply chain availability. That costs. They probably have on site engineering support they can offer you. That all costs.

What you're highlighting is the cost of CPUs has little to do with raw materials and with all this other attendant process. That has been true since a few short years after the product started existing.
https://forums.swift.org/t/really-bad-performance-with-concu...
Chat with the document means chat about that document with an LLM who has “read” it.

It can be useful; it's not hype nonsense.
Tangential, but a pet project I've been working on has been doing exactly that! Looking at US federal tax laws and using constraints solves to find optimal paths to the lowest taxes.

I don't really do anything besides play with it, my taxes are very simple and boring, but it's been a fun project to play around with.
Many competitors in this space, one that comes to mind is https://www.rapidpages.com/
AFAICT “Retina” is a marketing term used by Apple to refer to their first party displays with high pixel density. I use a QHD display with much lower pixel density and get blurry icons. Since writing the comment I realized I was using a very specific term in a general way, which is technically incorrect, but I thought that’s what the problem was.

From reading the comments in these threads and some additional resources, it does seem that the problem is not whether or not the display is “retina” per say, but that macOS is designed to run on high density displays and can have problems with low density ones. My mistake I guess.

I think the point that Apple should have better support for a wider range of displays still stands. It is not unreasonable to want your general purpose, professional-grade computer which costs thousands to work correctly with a variety of displays and resolutions, especially when lesser machines do it better.

At this point I’m just whinging bitterly though, the blurry icons are not the end of the world and buying new displays or a new computer just to fix them would be silly.
Even the center for computing history can't spell "Ada" right... :(
Even dumb phones can be tracked by antenna triangulation, and I wouldn't be surprised if Israeli hackers are inside Lebanese phone networks...
hardly, they would have folded and had a puppet government installed. many young men on both sides would be alive.
The only reason I can see that it would matter that the Switch is a low-end console is if you think Nvidia is incapable of building something higher end. Are you saying that Nvidia couldn't make more powerful hardware for a high end console? Otherwise, the Switch just demonstrates to me that Nvidia is willing to form the right partnership, and reliably supply the same chips for long periods of time.

I'm certain Nvidia would have no trouble doing a high end console, customized to Microsoft and/or Sony's exacting specs... for the right price.
A big ol' collection of abstract backgrounds
Sprinters who run very fast at the start of a race are technically faster at measurement time than a marathon runner who paces themselves over a prolonged period, despite finishing ahead of the sprinter at the finish line.

Isn’t it fun to measure things and create feel good narratives when it’s advantageous to your plot?
I would love to see a Gene Wolf rendition of that
>I’m a PM & designer in his late 30s who is itching to get into deep tech

I've always told people who are interested in getting into tech: if you don't love it enough to do it on your own, don't get into the field. Not because I think they're dumb, but to excel, you need an almost unhealthy obsession with building software.

So, having said that, I would explore the internet for a topic you are interested in and invest some of your free time into it. Build something to the point you think someone would buy it (polished, not throw away code). Make sure it's tested and relatively bug free. See how you feel after that.

Having said that (again), I have an undergrad MIS degree and it gave me a good foundation and I learned the jargon, but the vast majority of practical stuff I learned, I learned working on personal projects at home and projects at work.
The undisputed king of GBC. His modules are works of art. So many incredibly intricate and innovated mechanisms with lots of precisely coordinated parts, yet driven from a single standard Lego motor. And the videos are well-shot, clear and to the point.

Some favorites:

- Catch and spin robots: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXF7mgZ9mzk

- Basketball shooter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yud9ukF5cV8

- Pole dancing quartet (SFW): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6s0a7Z70WxM
lebanon has an economy that's currently in shambles, and its never been known for its productive capacity. even if they wanted to start making simple comms devices it might rely on infrastructure that they can't invest in, and take tech/capital they have not accumulated

it would be more realistic for them to receive it from the iran but there might be political hurdles to this and it would end up costing the iranians as hezbollah can't be expected to pay much for it
I never understood why checked exceptions “are bad”, but Result types “are good”. To me they feel like conceptually the same idea.
Kids Who Didn't Know Their Parents Were Russian Spies
Mine is "leadership sync":

https://youtu.be/1RAMRukKqQg?si=K02Vsl7UhiUHos06

If you ever worked in a dysfunctional org this video speaks volumes.
It's war. Much worse things have been happening in this war already (e.g. Hezbollah explicitly targeting Israeli residential areas and killing civilians). By contrast this action seems much more targeted and justifiable.

If your bar for taking action is "there can't even be a chance of hurting a civilian", then your army can't do anything, and your entire civilian populace is slaughtered when it's taken over by the enemy intent on destroying your country.
Given the nature of the human being, there’s no way to live in a free society without someone being hosed. And even then, capitalism has improved the life conditions of those hosed. Communism removes the freedom for everyone and it is effectively hosing everyone at the same time.
What's funny is that this register and conceit is one that I dearly love among science fiction and fantasy writers,

provided they fulfill the implicit promise, that on a second reading all such things will be clear.

It's an intentional device. Andre Norton is particularly adept at this: when accounting for my deep love of her many thin "pulp" novels, many of which exist in the same universe, something I regularly praise is the way she almost as a signature drops you without exposition into drama.

The conceit of a chatty expositional conversational narrator who can in effect be imaged to be turning to their friend-from-out-of-town to helpfully explain what this thing is or what the significance of that is—often with a presumed familiarity with the frame of reference their audience might hanve—is by contrast a crutch and now most characteristic of what we call Young Adult fiction.

Trust in the reader, and trust in their sufficient interest to file such things away, is, I think, characteristic of a different era—one that demanded more of readers. I don't think it's a coincidence that our own era finds this off-putting.

We're lazy now, and we have small token windows.

EDIT: and I could probably have reproduced, or at least completed, that line of McCaffery's, from memory—though that particular book shows its age and its history in being the first short story she wrote about her world Pern. She got a lot softer and more sentimental as she went along, and less prone to patriarchal stereotypes she brought along from her work as a romance writer.
Hack font is pretty good and doesn't collect your email https://github.com/source-foundry/Hack
It Is Possible to Live Aboard Cruise Ships Full Time
Congrats on the release. Open Scanner looks like a good alternative to the paid TurboScan (it's what I've been using for over 5+ years):

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/turboscan-pro-pdf-scanner/id34...
Can I ask what apps you use to meditate? I am trying some app called Balance, but it isn't helping me
> The obvious loss is to government revenue, but the more subtle and still very real loss is the diversion of high-powered talent from what could have been gains in efficiency and productivity to focus instead on corporate reorganizations and tax evasion games.

It's also a loss to all of us who find ourselves owning a "foreign" corporation for legitimate reasons, and having to do a lot of work proving that we're not playing shell games.

I'm an American living in the UK; I've started what's now a one-man bootstrapped company and it just makes sense for it to be incorporated in the UK. I don't mind paying taxes, but I don't want to have to pay them twice. UK taxes are generally higher than US taxes, and there are tax treaties to avoid double taxation, so no problem, right?

Wrong. First, if a US citizen owns more than 10% of a foreign corporation, there's an insanely complicated form you have to fill out, two pages of which are incomprehensible questions ("Is your company considered an X corporation under sections Y and Z of the Blablablah act?") that simply require an expert to fill out.

Secondly, if a US citizens owns more than 50% of a foreign company, by default, income from that company counts as personal income, but taxes paid by the company to another government don't count as personal taxes. You can get around this, apparently, but it's even more complicated.

So because of [REDACTED] lawyers and accountants that have come up with these schemes, I have to spend precious starting capital to a bunch of accountants to prove I'm not evading taxes, rather than actually doing something useful with that money (and that accountant doing something more useful with their time).
Apple says a lot of things at WWDC. Not all of them are entirely honest.
I think it does matter, because while it is out of your individual control, we can still work to push society to be more accepting and accommodating.
no no, it's just "ours is better", "think different", and "it just works". /s
Everyone plays fps games. This includes people who wouldn't consider themselves "fps gamers". Users who care about mouse input will go into the settings to target the 'correct' settings for them.

For everyone else, there's the OS values.

We're not having the same argument, but I didn't clarify in my initial post properly: It's best to launch your app for the first time with the default OS settings. Let the "power users (fps gamers)" tune settings that enable raw input.
Even a dumbphone with the GPS physically removed is going to be a lot easier to target than a one-way pager, since they are always chatting with the cell towers.
I was sure this as a link to the onion.

I mean, it would be very clever to call a feature you migth or might not include as quantum
That explanation doesn't make sense, given that the US had already banned the international slave trade in 1808.
this signal the death of the passive aggressive "take this offline" for me

also favorite comment "This video captures the absolute weirdness of millennials and zoomers inheriting the bureaucratic systems created by baby boomers"
I think that you have to download the PDF and upload it to your own site.

They have a "Discover" page with previously generated articles, but I think that they have some sort of manual review process to enable public access and it's not updated frequently. The newest articles there were from July. I tried copying the link for a previously generated article of mine and opening it from a private browser window but I just get sent to the main site.
The standard way to use dnscrypt-proxy is to set the resolver to 127.0.0.1.

Does Little Snitch do things differently?
Im assuming you’re saying they were looking for a casus belli. They well might have, but surely the assailants knew this was a likely consequence. Why did they proceed to breach the border if they didn’t want to trigger a war?
Edited the title to be a shortened-to-fit version of the sub-headline (which I found the most interesting)
I'm guessing this just isn't implemented yet. It feels like a very alpha-stage project, when I sign in with another account and use the URL from my previous session, it tries generating the article again, but seems to be hanging. Also, my 2nd account is unable to view the Discover page: a 403 error in dev tools says "User has not accepted consent form"

I would think sharing by URL should work, but has some bugs with it currently.