skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
TLDR: No.

Any time you are on anything other than your own site on your own hosting, you are subject to the rules and whims of someone else, no exception, end of story. Furthermore, you are never free from consequences, regardless, which is what a lot of people, if not most, mean when they demand freedom of speech. No one is required to listen to you, regardless of the truth or falsity of your proposition and they are free to react, short of violence, in a manner that reflects their own values and judgement. This is a condition of being a free, autonomous human. To have it any other way is to remove a portion of that autonomy from someone. Certain speech is curtailed by society when the exercise of that speech would create or exacerbate harm to some protected individuals. You might disagree with some of those limitations, but until a majority of people think the same as you, those limitations will continue to exist.
https://archive.is/i4682
It absolutely does not. The violence will continue with both sides dishing it out and feeling completely justified in doing so because of what was previously done to them.
> Why is the cyber industry so desperately stupid for attention?

Burglaries aren't getting enough attention.
Edera: Building a better Kubernetes and AI security solution from the ground up
I think the point is to embarrass vendors into extending their support periods. Giving them 60 days to think about that is a shot across the bow.
What about The Arab League? They're designating them as terrorists, US or not...

Edit: Above is retracted - cjbprime found later information.
> Aluminum seems like it would be fine

There are risks with aluminium causing neurological problems, especially the soft unanodised stuff. I think aluminium cooking pans are banned in some countries.
You can reduce the spend per person by replacing more qualified workers with less qualified (cheaper) workers, and adding friction to the process of obtaining healthcare.

Increasing prior authorizations, increasing paperwork complexity, increasing hold times on the phone, obfuscation for who is responsible for what, constantly changing coverage so people have to change providers, and otherwise discourage them from seeking care.
It isn't rhetoric... It is a specific combat strategy that small nations employ against huge ones. By targeting non-combatants and creating "terror" you can break the will of a larger nation.

If the USA in 2001 could have waved a magic wand that killed all the Taliban and didn't touch a hair on any non-combatants head they would have waved it and called it a day.
If you end with a pipe, you don't need the backslash before the newline. It's implicit.

https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/253518/where-are-ba...

When writing bash, if I have a command with many switches, I use an array to avoid backslashes and make the intent clearer:

curl_cmd=(
curl
--silent
--fail
--output "$output_file"
"$url"
)
"${curl_cmd[@]}"

I also insist on long-form options in shell scripts since they are much more self-documenting as compared to single-letter options.
Right. "The definition of terrorism is controversial and political"

Although I mostly recall the word "insurgent" being used for local fighters in those cases.
Compile and Run C in JavaScript
Everything with a battery. I m safe here on my desktop PC. My phone is 2 rooms down.
In this particular case, I was out of the loop regarding the clever analogy myself. I'm now a tad smarter because someone else expressed lack of understanding, and I learned from responses to this (grayed due to downvotes) comment.
Facebook only if you don't care about being promoted, from a pretty senior friend of mine who works there.
Given the videos showing explosions next to civilians (< 1m in one case) that walk away unharmed afterwards, I'd say that this is pretty surgical.
I mostly agree with you, but I also agree with a parent comment that part of that gray area depends on who's side you're on. For instance:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Beirut_barracks_bombings

That was a Marine barracks that was part of a "military peacekeeping operation". Granted, 128 non-military Americans were injured, but all of the dead people were military. The U.S. politicians labelled it terrorism.
The simplest example that comes to mind of something frequency analysis might be useful for would be if you had simple ciphertext where you knew that the characters probably 1:1 mapped, but you didn't know anything about how.

It could also be useful for guessing whether someone might have been trying to do some kind of steganographic or additional encoding in their work, by telling you how abnormal compared to how many people write it is that someone happened to choose a very unusual construction in their work, or whether it's unlikely that two people chose the same unusual construction by coincidence or plagiarism.

You might also find statistical models interesting for things like noticing patterns in people for whom English or others are not their first language, and when they choose different constructions more often than speakers for whom it was their first language.

I'm not saying you can't use an LLM to do some or all of these, but they also have something of a scalar attached to them of how unusual the conclusion is - e.g. "I have never seen this construction of words in 50 million lines of text" versus "Yes, that's natural.", which can be useful for trying to inform how close to the noise floor the answer is, even ignoring the prospect of hallucinations.
Transcoding using hardware acceleration is one of those things that some people insist upon, like wanting "gaming" everything and overclocking everything, but most people don't need.

First, the quality of output of hardware accelerated transcoding is in most instances noticeably worse than CPU transcoding, as in most people can discern the difference watching two videos side-by-side.

Second, CPU transcoding is more than enough to keep up with most streams. For instance, 1920x1080 h.264 streams can be done in real time by even a modest 4 core processor. People who want 4K h.265 can buy a fancier CPU.

Third, most people are served perfectly fine by pre-transcoded files. Your comment about subtitles isn't correct - most streaming devices can accept subtitle metadata, and even if subtitles need to be burned in, they can be burned in to a static file and/or generated in real time by a CPU.

What's interesting is that the same people who want Intel Quicksync claim they want to transcode to the best quality that a device can support, then say they don't want to transcode to a static file because they don't want to transcode to a lower resolution / bitrate than what their best device can support, but want to be able to view things at the highest quality wherever they want. They've been tricked, because if they really cared about quality, they'd care about the difference in quality between QuickSync and CPU encoding.

That's why I tell people that if the really want highest quality real time transcoding and have sources that are ultra high quality, they'd be much happier with a Ryzen 7900 than with Intel QuickSync. Side-by-side comparisons would bear this out every time.
What rclgrep does is run the recoll text extraction and do a grep-like operation on the extracted texts. If you want to give it a try, don't hesitate to contact me if you have any trouble building or using it, or think it could be improved. It's more or less a (working) prototype at the moment, but I'm willing to expand it if it looks useful. The "Usage" string is much better in the latest git source than in the tar, and it sorely needs a man page.
That’s cool. I’ve been developing on Mac before Objective-C 2.0 and iOS since the AppStore was released. Millions of downloads, featured in the store, worked on dozens of projects from video games to MFi firmware, and have been invited to Cupertino to meet with teams.

I’m not defending SwiftUI. I mostly use it as a wrapper around NS/UIKit because it’s still buggy and not as flexible.

By the way, SwiftUI is also implemented on top of CALayers just like NS/UIKit. It can be fast in theory, but you have to know exactly where the pain points are and most developers don’t know how to do that.
A simple salt water rinse is enough to deal with halitosis. Much easier and the effects seem to last longer than prescription mouthwashes at a sufficient concentration.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266714762...
Well, niche forums are kinda different when they manage to stay small and niche. Not just HN but car forums, LED forums, etc.

But if they ever include other topics, they risk becoming more mainstream and noisy. Even within adjacent fields (like the various Stacks) it gets pretty bad.

Maybe the trick is to stay within a single small sphere then and not become a general purpose discussion site? And to have a low enough volume of submissions where good moderation is still possible? (Thank you dang and HN staff)
Unfortunately, you are seriously uninformed. Israel and Hezbolla are in active war for more than 11 months now.

On a side note, I think people should strive to be more humble when they talk about issues they don't understand, or understand very little.
>the EPA is going to keep going after aftermarket tuners; too much evidence to ignore.

Which will probably drive them off shore where the regulators don't matter and then people will be buying tuners from China or buying off the shelf commercial scan tools and loading new firmware onto them that lets them use them as tuners and do whatever.

The only reason this hasn't happened yet is because domestic tuners have generally satiated that demand at the right price.

Many of these tuners deal with all sorts of pesky chimes and idiot-proofing of which at least a couple specific features are a nuisance to any given person, default settings you can't change, etc, etc so the demand that's there is more than just enthusiasts and the people who'd rather turn off the CEL in software than replace a cat.
Tip: when a greyed out comment is difficult to read, click on its timestamp. That will open a view on just that comment and its replies and it will not be greyed out in that view.
How Dropbox uses Lakera Guard to secure our LLMs
They do this because they know Israel will overplay their hand and indiscriminately murder people.

Dont whatabout me. I'm not defending Hamas, merely critizing Israel.

One is a terrorist organization; the other is a nation state. One has orders of magnitude more innocent blood on their hands than the other.

You are telling me that Israel has the capability of pulling off this pager attack, but its only way to deal with Hamas was to raze Gaza? Pfft.
The problems are well-known and highly-documented. You should leave the determination of (b) up to those who know and understand (a), which includes the author.
You can make play dough at home by cooking a flour and water mixture till it thickens up, add lots of salt (to discourage eating) and colouring to taste.

When I was a child my mom would cook me a fresh batch every month or so during my frequent clay phases.
> This is basically X's position – they will enforce countries speech laws, no more, no less.

It may be their stated position, but not their practice, as has been recently demonstrated in Brazil.
This seems good, but can it also be done via ACLs in vanilla Kubernetes?
Hard disagree. The IDF kills civilians, yes, but I am not aware of a deliberate effort to target civilians. The civilian deaths are overwhelmingly a consequence of Hamas blending in with the population and conducting operations where any retaliation puts civilians at risk.

There is a meaningful difference between collateral death and terrorism.
Nothing but terms and conditions of the website. That's how Paul Holes identified the Golden State Killer, he created a fake profile and sent in the DNA from a crime scene and worked backwards from the results to find a suspect.
Hardly. You are talking about a statistical test, which will have rather large errors (since it is based on word frequencies). Not to mention word frequencies will vary depending on the type of text (essay, description, advertisement, etc).
> It killed and injured more than 3 thousand people, including children.

Well the number of killed versus injured is significant and not mentioned. The mention of children is bundled with the large figure. It could be interpreted that 3000 people were killed, 2900 of which are children, which is exactly how it will be quoted and portrayed.

This is pretty irresponsible use of language.

Check headlines and how this is portrayed and compare the statistical figures mentioned. Also who is being quoted and if they are in quotes or how they are quoted. There's a lot of ambiguity.

In times of war, which this unfortunately is, irresponsible reporting is dangerous and leads to further problems.
They also as much as said "There's places where you can do this but they're cesspools" which almost makes me feel like the real question is "Is there any way I can have the experience of moderated discussion without any risk of me being moderated?" to which the answer is 100% "Yes, your own forum, but don't be surprised if other people aren't sold on the value proposition."
One of the examples is the increased usage of "delve" which Google Trends confirms increased in usage since 2022 (initial ChatGPT release): https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=delve&hl...

It seems however it started increasing most in usage just these last few months, maybe people are talking more about "delve" specifically because of the increase in usage? A usage recursion of some sorts.
Still more reactive than PTFE.
There is debate about the new deal. Its not clear it was a success.
I suppose that depends on how many of the injured people were bystanders, as opposed to being the people who owned the pagers, do you agree?
The word is notoriously ill-defined, so much in fact that most newspapers of record will not use it [1]

[1] https://www.theglobeandmail.com/standards-editor/article-und...
> If it's not terrorism, what is the differentiating factor(s)?

Typically the differentiating factor is who the victims are and what the goal of the operation are - terrorists = victims are primarily civilian and the operation has negligible military benefit. Not terrorists = the targets are military. If there is collateral damage then it is not excessive (or not intended to be; intent matters) in relation to the military objective.

All this is subjective of course, and politics are involved, but that is what the difference is usually given as.

In this particular case - i would say it would be terrorism if it was random people's radios & pagers, but not terrorism if it was pagers/radios bought for military purpose that were primarily owned by soldiers. Initial reports suggest it is the latter, but i imagine more details will appear in time to better make that determination.
It's complicated and hard to tell. One should, at the very least, include other relevant data. That could very well be better than hiding. The problem is statistics can, and are, cherry picked constantly.

I think there's an opportunity here for some neo-nazi belief systems to get credibility from large organizations.
People misconstrue (naively or purposefully) what it means to target as opposed to collateral damage.
Fighting Misinformation: AI Predicts Disinformation on X
Sure. "The definition of terrorism is controversial and political."

How governments, media, etc. use that word is often politically loaded and not based on some agreed objective definition.
> Genuinely, are there many desirable workplaces left that are remote?

Are you serious? Try the entire tech industry except Amazon and Apple.
The premier open weight models don't even comparatively perform well on the public benchmarks compared to frontier models. And that's assuming at least some degree of benchmark contamination for the open weight models.

While I don't think they're completely useless (though its close), calling them fantastic replacements feels like an egregious overstatement of their value.

EDIT: Also wanted to note that I think this becomes as much an expectations-setting exercise as it is evaluation on raw programming performance. Some people are incredibly impressed by the ability to assist in building simple web apps, others not so much. Experience will vary across that continuum.
>Any better than 'good enough' isn't rational and the people running that company should be fired.

This is kind of the reason the Japanese economy is stagnant and continues to fail in winning global marketshare. Businesses that are too good will fail or at least not compete with businesses that settle for being good enough.
Inflicting casualties on innocent people to instill terror in the population has literally been Israel's military policy for at least half a century.
It is targeted, by definition. Every pager was owned by a Hezbollah member or was about to be. Same with the walkies.

That there was collateral damage is unfortunate, but Israel was definitely not indiscriminately targeting civilians, which is what would make it terrorism.

This was a surgical strike that happened to have some unfortunate collateral damage. Well within the accepted rules of war.
The latest issue is an attack on Israel? Are you referring to Oct 7?

Oct 7 had a 71-72% civilian casualty. Project Lavender considered a 90-100% civilian casualty rate to be acceptable and the number of civilians killed vs number of Hama killed far exceeds the ratio on Oct 7.

Israel has systematically destroyed Gaza building by building ruining the lives of millions of people. That is the latest and continuing issue. Ethnic cleansing is a crime against humanity.
"Terrorism" is one of the most useful terms for dehumanizing and delegitimizing a group's actions. It's only a useful term insofar as it's applied only to the enemy.

Mental gymnastics will be in full force here and in the media/politics to recategorize it.

I have no doubt a headline saying "Israeli politicians' hand-held radios explode, killing three, one day after pager blasts" would receive very different responses in this thread.
You’d have to work out what variants predispose for that which is no easy task. And once you did that you don’t even really need individual dna data. You might find say a swedish population tends to have the variant and you just target swedes in general.
Twitter shut off API access; users volunteering their own data for an open API
Do you even believe this nonsense?

Of course the guy's a lunatic. He also happens to have a lot of support within certain very powerful circles, not in spite of but because of what he's proposing to do in Gaza, and for his lunatic, outright fascistic worldview generally. That's why they made him National Security Minister, after all.

There was nothing remotely racist in my post, and I don't appreciate the smear.
Oof that k looks way too much like r to me

EDIT: the font the website uses, not comic-code
even though incidents happened on both sides, neither side has started an 'active war' against the other. plus, we don't know who tampered with those devices
Jupyter notebooks are missing strict types, a linter and unit tests. When can those features be added?
The license is the "Business Source License 1.1" [1].

The Business Source License (BSL) 1.1 is a software license created by MariaDB Corporation. It's designed as a middle ground between fully open-source licenses and traditional proprietary software licenses. It's kind of neat because it's a parameteric license, in that you can change some parameters while leaving the text of the license unchanged.

For codon, the "Change Date" is 2028-03-01 and the "Change License" is "Apache License, Version 2.0", meaning that the license will change to Apache2 in March of 2028. Until then, I guess you need to make a deal with Exaloop to use codon in production.

[1] https://github.com/exaloop/codon?tab=License-1-ov-file#readm...
> It's been a while since I've googled a "how do I..." type thing

Same, but you’re missing planet-sized elephant in the room here. This use-case has been technically solved for 20 years. What’s happened is that web search was ripe for consumer value extraction (aka enshittification). Have you ever seen a market more saturated with perverse incentives, from ad delivery, content farms, data mining, and of course the very search engine that prints money from it?

Now, if you wanna do an apples-apples comparison, imagine popups, consent forms, hidden influences from advertisers, recommendation engines, arbitrary lock-outs from community guidelines violations, ads while waiting for responses, JS bloat at recipe-website levels, and so on and so forth.

By all means, enjoy ChatGPT or whatever in its naked current form. But make no mistake that this is the honeymoon phase. Potential doesn’t govern the direction of new tech. Incentive does.
> Not to stir the specter of laziness, but I’ve noticed our recent college hire gets nothing done when he’s remote. Then on Tuesday morning, he comes in with a TON of questions.

You're making some wild conclusions off of N=1, especially N=1 of a recent college graduate. Do you even remember your first job? I would have had a ton of questions regardless of being remote or in-office.

And why even mention laziness? For a recent college grad who's learning the job, "getting nothing done" is an expectation for at least 20% of the working days, it's just for learning.

> But in the short-term, RTO would improve productivity.

Why would it make a difference? A question asked remotely vs a question asked in-person should take roughly the same amount of time to answer.

> So it’s clear we haven’t figured out how properly share knowledge in a remote setting.

That's really sad that after 4 years of a pandemic some people haven't figured out how to type out a question in Teams or whatever. Or maybe they were so beat down by the corporate culture that they are afraid to do so?
it's outcome quality per amount paid

Outcome is not one thing. The patient wants better health. The provider has an interest in profits. The government has an interest in optics…well anyone using “AI” does.
You don't need the backslashes in that case. As with lines ending in pipes and a few other places, the line continuation is implicit after the &&:

https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/253518/where-are-ba...
Yes, pull is old. Pull request, which the original poster was explicitly discussing, is a GitHub thing.
Have any non-youtube links?
I don't think it's reasonable to say that the purpose was to disable those electronic devices. The devices were compromised and modified to include explosives. They could have been modified with a remote kill-switch that destroyed the device without causing a large explosion. The purpose of the explosion was to injure humans, not to make devices inoperable.
As an MLE who comes from backend web dev, I have flip-flopped on notebooks. I initially felt that everything should be in a python script. But I see the utility in notebooks now.

For notebooks in an ML pipeline, I find that data issues are usually where things fail. Being able to run code "up to" a certain cell and create plots is invaluable. Creating reports by creating a data frame and displaying it as a cell is also super-handy.

You say, "dial some logic in", which is begging the wrong question (in my experience, at least). The logic in ML is usually very strait forward. It's about the data coming into your process and how your models are interacting with it.
Yeah, my list of requirements for self-hosting starts with:

1. battery backup

That said, I'm not zealous about it. "Perfect is the enemy of good" and I like ecosystem diversity in general. Better to have a few dozen shared hosting providers than 2 or 3 monopolies.
Was there an internal sense that the business model was flawed? You can only sell so many DNA tests to people, and the pharma research angle always felt like more of a pipe dream than a viable business.