skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is the system prompt it uses:

You are an expert AI assistant that explains your reasoning step by step. For each step, provide a title that describes what you're doing in that step, along with the content. Decide if you need another step or if you're ready to give the final answer. Respond in JSON format with 'title', 'content', and 'next_action' (either 'continue' or 'final_answer') keys. USE AS MANY REASONING STEPS AS POSSIBLE. AT LEAST 3. BE AWARE OF YOUR LIMITATIONS AS AN LLM AND WHAT YOU CAN AND CANNOT DO. IN YOUR REASONING, INCLUDE EXPLORATION OF ALTERNATIVE ANSWERS. CONSIDER YOU MAY BE WRONG, AND IF YOU ARE WRONG IN YOUR REASONING, WHERE IT WOULD BE. FULLY TEST ALL OTHER POSSIBILITIES. YOU CAN BE WRONG. WHEN YOU SAY YOU ARE RE-EXAMINING, ACTUALLY RE-EXAMINE, AND USE ANOTHER APPROACH TO DO SO. DO NOT JUST SAY YOU ARE RE-EXAMINING. USE AT LEAST 3 METHODS TO DERIVE THE ANSWER. USE BEST PRACTICES.

The Python crap around it is superfluous.

Does it work? Well not really:

https://lluminous.chat/?sl=Yjkxpu

https://lluminous.chat/?sl=jooz48

I have also been using this prompt, and while it fails on then problem above, it works better for me than OPs prompt:

Write many chains of thought for how you’d approach solving the user's question. In this scenario, more is more. You need to type out as many thoughts as possible, placing all your thoughts inside <thinking> tags.
Your thoughts are only visible to yourself, the user does not see them and they should not be considered to be part of the final response.
Consider every possible angle, recheck your work at every step, and backtrack if needed.
Remember, there are no limits in terms of how long you can think - more thinking will always lead to a better solution.
You should use your thoughts as a scratchpad, much like humans do when performing complicated math with paper and pen. Don't omit any calculation, write everything out explicitly.
When counting or maths is involved, write down an enormously verbose scratchpad containing the full calculation, count, or proof, making sure to LABEL every step of the calculation, and writing down the solution step by step.
Always remember that if you find yourself consistently getting stuck, taking a step back and reconsidering your approach is a good idea. If multiple solutions are plausible, explore each one individually, and provide multiple answers.
Always provide mathematical proofs of mathematical answers. Be as formal as possible and use LaTeX.
Don't be afraid to give obvious answers. At the very very end, after pages upon pages of deep thoughts, synthesize the final answer, inside <answer> tags.

In particular it solves this problem: https://lluminous.chat/?sl=LkIWyS
Smearing maybe, but washing it off with a pressurized stream of water is the most hygienic thing you can do.
To avoid this risk: either you solo mine your transaction, or you submit your transaction to a mining pool that will not broadcast it to the P2P network until it is mined. Some pools offer this as a service (eg. https://slipstream.mara.com/). This is kludgey but this is because the puzzle is inherently limited by its technical design.

Note that this issue doesn't exist with puzzle numbers that are multiple of 5, because these addresses have their public key already known. So everyone is on a level playing field. The multiple of 5 have been solved up to #125: https://privatekeys.pw/puzzles/bitcoin-puzzle-tx
So it’s the asic groq guys right?

Because it says so nowhere in the repo.

Man Elon makes things confusing.
0 and >0 parents technically, but in practice usually between 0 and 2. Merge commits (commits with >1 parent) can have more than 2 parents.
I generally agree. However, times have changed. The middle class standards that many of us grew up with and set for ourselves are increasingly difficult to achieve. The expectations were not particularly high and they seemed reasonable at the time they were set.
I’m a relatively smart person, probably above average, but glad bitcoin hasn’t taken over banking because I don’t understand any of this.
https://slipstream.mara.com/
Perhaps a little fluid that dries and pinches some skin in the end of the penis?

When I experience this kind of thing (rarely, less than you) that's usually the vibe.
> Obviously Mr. Beast isn’t as far out ethically as casinos

That’s not obvious
From the article:

> While there are other eSIM adapters, the JMP adapter is the only one that doesn’t use a proprietary, closed source app.
I can't imagine that getting that filled OTC reasonably close to the mark would be serious trouble. Germany managed to sell 50,000 BTC without much trouble a few months ago.

Then again, it may be serious trouble if you have serious issues explaining the source.
I had an ex-marine boss leading QA and Prod support. Every time someone would go nuts about incidents being the end of the world, especially our biz users, he'd just ask if anyone was at risk of getting shot. If not, focus up and solve the problem, but no need to run causing extra fuss and stress.
Have you interacted with a Common Lisp, Smalltalk, or Prolog REPL. That’s what programming should look like, but with other languages, you have to mostly visualize these interactions or do with the rougher edit-compile-run cycle.

If you think your job as implementing only specifications (in form of Jira tickets), then maybe you don’t see the difference. But more often, you’re trying to define the problem in the first as the customers can only describe the current situation and needs. The job is to design a system that could satisfy these needs and going iteratively from natural language to code, removing ambiguity in the process. Stopping midway in the process and hoping an LLM can continue down is just playing slot machine with code. And then there’s the whole system evolution and maintenance.
same case here. almost new guy on my team we need to train them because basically just know to use what vs code exposes as git interface and some of them can replicate the same flow on terminal. rebase? that's a forbidden command for them, while our entire company use this as daily basis.

that just kinda sad. hopeless.
>No. I don't know where in the world you got that from what I said.

I’m trying to be generous by helping to clarify what you mean otherwise it comes across as someone arguing for the sake of arguing.

>You want to make it uniform

Not at all, and that was never said or implied. My point is the opposite; that programs differ in funding. I just take it a step further to make the point that lower funding leads to less funded PhD opportunities. Take early during COVID; funding temporarily dropped when many foreign students could no longer attend meaning it was easier for a self funded student get into a top program (I know because that’s what I did.) That same funding dynamic plays out with lower ranked schools because they tend to get much less research dollars.

>the reputation of a program is determined by a number of factors

Again, I don’t think anyone is disputing this. The point is about how reputation is related to funding and funding is related to PhD opportunities.
With an actual fire (or hazardous environment) people’s lives are at risk and it makes a big difference. Hopefully those executives act accordingly or they’ll face jail time for putting their employees in harm’s way. That is not the same as being unable to produce.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/ex-coal-chief-gets-one-y...
It's true at some points in the parameter space, not at others. If you never brake at all, starting to brake more aggressively would be great!

Once you've tuned your parameters to be driving pretty safely and minimizing accidents, which is what Waymo is surely doing for some definition of "minimizing accidents", it must be true that every further parameter change involves a tradeoff like this.
Doesn't excuse knowingly encouraging kids to gamble and covering for SA, or selling unhealthy chocolate bars to kids under the guise of health food.
I have a penis, mid 30s, a few years ago I started exclusively sitting when I pee, and use a wand bidet.

A former partner, upon seeing me sit down to pee for the first time, exclaimed 'thats the hottest thing I have seen a man do!'

Lol. I said it's bc I clean my own bathroom, and vastly prefer to sit anyway. It's comfy.

Oh, and I have a squatty spotty, but don't use it super often.

I hate the vibe of pee on my clothing. If I use a urinal, I try to treat it like the urinal pictured at the end of the article.
They had double-height PCMCIA cards without the pop-out that you could directly plug into. The Apple Newton was a PCMCIA device. It wouldn't take much for manufacturers to bring it back just by including it in a new design, but that would be too convenient, right?

What I've witnessed recently is that the kids really want their buttons and switches and are sick of janky digital UI. And get a load of Apple wowing everyone with a button on the new iPhone 16! What is old is new again.
https://archive.ph/TInlo
Seems like it's since been reworked, but before 2014 elementary kids in the US were tested and potentially placed in the GATE Program[1] based on their results.

[1] https://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/gt/
“If my product is worth $5 and I sell it for $6…” Is not a sustainable business in that specific competitive landscape.

VCs don’t even need to exist for this to occur.

So I didn’t mention anything regarding VCs and market distortions or lack thereof?
> They pay had better be incredible to make playing those kinds of political games worth having your soul drained.

In my experience, pay increases linearly with soul drainage. As I started working for larger and larger companies the amount of nonsense and pay increase by the same order.

Responsibility decreases by the same magnitude, so while I was responsible for the whole IT operation/decisions of a small company for the lowest pay I ever had, I’d now be able to coast for half a year without anyone really noticing. BigCo is fucking weird.
Dogpack404 is a former mrbeast employee currently exposing mrbeast for varying misconduct, such as faking his videos, running illegal lotteries through his videos, doing a crypto pump n dump, making fraudulent claims about his merch, inhumane treatment of contestants and harbouring multiple sex offenders at his company. The list goes on and Dogpack404 is not the only one currently exposing things like this, but is maybe the most prominent.
It could be that there is no such case of someone being swatted and killed in Germany because of smaller population, or because of differences in police training.
In the end, the pathway to police not having to draw their weapons is the path where unexpected threats are minimal on the side of the average citizen.
Police is also a victim in case of swatting. Imho no need to be overly emotional about preventive actions focused on the weapons only if they are not possible easily, or if small number of problematic cases suggests lesser priority. I see different things to discuss first: Police blaming swatted victims. Police not allowing submission of warnings by victims beforehand.
I see the parallel you're drawing but even the core idea is I think different enough to be worse dissecting.

In manufacturing, you keep spare capacity to allow for more lucrative orders to come in. If you don't expect any, you run at 100%. For instance when Apple pays TSMC all the money in the world to produce the next iPhone chip, they won't be running that line at 70%, the full capacity is reserved.

Or if you're a bakery, you won't keep two or three cake cooking spots just on case someone comes in witb an extraordinary order, you won't make enough on that to cover the lost opportunity.

We run our servers at 70% or even 50% capacity because we don't have control on what that capacity will be used for, as external events happen all the time. A manufacturers receiving a spike of extra orders can just refuse them and go on with their day. Our servers getting hit with 10x the demand requires efforts and measures to protect the servers and current traffic.

Factories want to optimize for efficiency, server farms want to pay for more reactivity, that's the nature of the business.
There is also another puzzle for finding a sha256 collision, the address script just checks if the 2 inputs are different but have the same hash and if true it unlocks the coins.

That one is even easier to steal because it doesn't even require a digital signature and there are tons of bots out there inspecting live transactions and if they don't require a signature they just create a new transaction with an increased fee and their own address as recipient.
MongoDB CEO says if AI hype were the dotcom boom, it is 1996
Because if nothing else gets you, cancer risk rises as you get older. At some point it gets you, I guess.
The whole point is convincing developers that they are in a 'war' and that making the ultimate sacrifice (i.e. giving up their life just so the delivery date can be made) is acceptable, even heroic.

It's a vile way to treat people.
But in either case if the IT department/management actually wants to destroy the devices, no procedures from Apple will affect that decision.

Either way, as it stands now it doesn’t cost the company anything to have the devices shredded. Without activation locks it will, either by forgoing the premium paid by the recyclers or by having to pay a shredder to do it for them.

It’s a power difference. Activation locks give companies more power to control what happens to devices after they’ve left their custody. It also makes it more likely for devices to get shredded because companies need to affirmatively consent to the devices being resold after leaving their custody. This benefits Apple by taking used devices off the market.

This affirmative consent element is also quite powerful in the consumer space for the same reason that opt-out organ donation is so successful: people generally prefer defaults and shy away from making extra decisions that complicate their lives. This means people are much more likely to trade in their old phones to Apple (who either shred or sell as refurbished) instead of selling on the open market.
Exactly. Yes. The world has changed in many ways but the "all ads are evil" crowd just doesn't represent how people at least historically looked at trades/hobby/etc. magazine content. The ads were part of that content.

As you say, lots of conflicts of interest etc. but ads were part of the package.
It got stolen from the original solver by someone who noticed the transaction and posted a bigger fee
Even with a wand bidet, you don't touch the shit, mostly. Point the stream of the wand along the hand to make a little directable steam, modulate shape and power, etc.

Like using a hose at half pressure and your thumb over the end to clean dropped food on marble. You'd sort it out, generally don't have to scrub.

And if you have to scrub, it's under a steam of running water. But usually no scrubbing.

Cleaning the toilet is easier with a wand bidet, too. I like that the wand is extremely low profile, nothing under the toilet seat.

Talking about this directly in America feels ever so slightly sstrange, and this website codes american. Maybe I'm projecting.
My source was a government site, make of it what you will. I may have worded it more strongly than I should have. https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/hotweather.shtml
Apple: exploits factory workers to fulfill the customer’s desire for status symbols.

McDonalds: exploits hunger by conditioning you to desire convenient, unhealthy, and ultimately unsatisfying food.

TikTok: exploits your dopamine to condition you to watch content, keeping you entertained with new quick doses constantly.

You can pick almost any major company and find some way they exploit someone else.
I'd say I get the adult baby videos 1 in 15 "swipes" and the bodycam / court stuff are for long form, and is definitely because I watch true crime - i.e. I found courtroom videos of long trials fascinating because I wanted to be a lawyer growing up

It's important to note it's not about individual feeds, but the basins that algorithmic content settles in given the data they have.

As things evolve, they optimize for brutally efficient production. "true crime" starts as "NPR award-winning podcast phenomena" and very quickly come to mean a swath of "DUI arrest" videos.

That's because the initial click, averaged across all of us, is *hyper*optimized for a thumbnail with an attractive scantily clad young female saying COPS DAUGHTER THROWS TANNTRUM AFTER BLOWING 0.24! It's not about individuals, or individuals feeds, it's about these niches get hyperdominated by nonsense because that's what best practice is. c.f. document's comments re: thumbnails vs. mine.

Note also, for instance, the curious absence of any programmer influencers making anywhere near the views of pretty much any other topic on YouTube. t3.gg is the top in software engineering videos by a mile, and they pull in 1/10th of what a bodycam video does.
no trace of Jenisch in my sociolect, and almost no Rotwelsch, with the exceptions of: Bock haben, der Bulle (both in my active vocabulary) and die Musch (only know through cabaret songs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xD2i8Ix9Md8 )

see also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polari , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mattenenglisch

EDIT: come to think of it, I often see Roma in their encampments, but I'm pretty sure they pass through with even less interaction than the tourists (and both they and we prefer it that way).

Lagniappe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAYt6dpCgOI&t=90s
The football metaphor for ‘war mode’ really might be switching to playing defense. 4th and ten was last quarter. Right now, we don’t have possession and we’re trying to minimize the risk of conceding points.

And maybe that means that now is the time for your star playmaking quarterback and receivers to be on the bench planning the play for when the pendulum swings back, and some different players should be center stage.

Or maybe metaphors are just metaphors.
Articles only need click-bait titles, not pictures, in order to be profitable. Relevant and informative pictures are an unecessary expense. People don’t read articles to be informed, people read articles to feel smart. And to just feel smart, you don’t actually need a picture.
If you can predict precisely how often in an input stream randomness occurs, it's not randomness.
Disney’s claims and paperwork has to be accepted by the Paraguayan trademark office specifically in this case, not just any trademark office.

Unless both the US and Paraguay have ratified a 100% automatic international trademark treaty, which seems unlikely.
i don't know of many, but I've got kids in a similar range and I endorse Kurzgesagt. CGP Grey hits nice sometimes too (they loved the flags, hexagons, and dragon videos)
Another good resource on these puzzles: https://privatekeys.pw/puzzles/bitcoin-puzzle-tx
Aren't you effectively trusting that service not to front run you?
Why would you expect this. These people doing the swatting often aren't even citizens. These are often foreign attacks and the inept police make these attacks very effective.
I’m traveling so can’t look on the shelf, but off the top of my head I’d recommend The Wizard War: British Scientific Intelligence 1939-1945, R. V. Jones, 1978.
That's a good point, to get someone's jewelry you just need to get in their house, to get someone's bitcoin you need to get your hands on them. I suppose that makes it more dangerous, but instead of jewelry, you know someone in a really nice house is probably very valuable to someone else, ransoming them is basically the same thing.
As scary as the last two lines are, it's not the developer abandoning ship, it's just him optimizating the process. Cutting releases was taking time best spent on dev, and commiting to main as a mainly solo project is perfectly reasonable.
Did they also flock to the Fediverse? If not, why not?
Yeah. As someone with ADD who over-medicated with Adderall for a period, this is the kind of shit I'd love to do. Organization for organization's sake. Making lists of lists and links to docs with more lists and connections to spreadsheets, etc. Spinning my wheels I'd call it. Reinventing the internet locally. I wonder how many of these people are eating 30+ mg of Adderall a day. It feels fun, but you're not actually doing anything.
Presumably Zapier?
… unless your trustless worldwide monetary system wants to process more than seven transactions per second.

I guess BoA probably handles a little more than that?
> But, what's the alternative?

Ban YouTube. Have only 1 movie/TV night.

Mandate books as primary entertainment.

Stock the home library with classic tales of heroism and adventure. Own an encyclopedia set.

Reject the brainshinker system and look to works of more enduring worth.

Videos should be thoughtful. If that's not possible in the family dynamic, shut it down.
There is such a thing as a first mover advantage, as long as one doesn't focus on competitors as much as unserved / underserved customers.

Pretty often people that heavily emphasize the competition and push arbitrary timelines have taken shortcuts, or at least aren't being transparent enough to satisfy the team. They may also just be competitive by nature and insecure due to a lack of experience, and bad at communicating - also, due to a lack of experience.

Agile / Scrum: people quickly realized that they had to give up control in order to be agile.

It's possible to do Agile and to structure a waterfall software project into smaller chunks that feel agile, but you need PM's who know how to do that, and they need to show their work to the team in order to get buy-in. It's too bad the jargon got abused to the point of garnering resentment.
Seems like kind of an insane assumption giving the history of lynchings in this country and with how trigger happy cops are taught to be
What about managing sysmoEUICC1-C2G with EasyEUICC/OpenEUICC?
Yeah, again I meant irrelevant to those who share such a broader ("dynamic" is a fun turn of phrase) definition of "literal" as I was using, it's very relevant to CL. I thought of mentioning the CL undefined behavior around modification you brought up explicitly in the first comment as yet another reason I try to avoid using #() and quoted lists, but it seemed like too much of an aside in an already long aside. ;) But while in aside-mode, this behavior I really think is quite a bad kludge of the language, and possibly the best thing Clojure got right was its insistence on non-place-oriented values. But it is what it is.

Bringing up C is useful because I know a similar "literal" syntax has existed since C99 for structs, and is one of the footguns available to bring up if people start forgetting that C is not a subset of C++. Looks like they call it "compound literals": https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/compound_literal (And of course you can type expressions like y=1+4 that result in the struct having y=5.) And it also notes about possible string literal sharing. One of the best things Java got right was making strings immutable...
Tolstoy, "Anna Karenina" (1873)
The Elon one is spelled Grok, not Groq.
Previously submitted: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41542748
Proof has never been used to justify arrests, just prosecutions. Or rather it's never been a necessary bar that must be demonstrated. Warrants at least have mildly higher bars
That's untrue.