skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The cutoff point is not related to how many applicants there are. It's related to how qualified you are. I'm sorry there's no clear answer here. We've all just got to keep applying until we land that job.
https://www.bslgroup.com.au/structural-steel-fabrication/
Videogames seem to be continuing to bloat.
Essentially, the larger the scope/influence is of the body of people deciding what speech to censor, the more dangerous it is to give them that power. This is irrespective of the actual information being censored.
> a thing called copyright

All the chatbot corps out there: And I took that personally.
There was no "coup attempt". There was a protest. Like many before it. Brazilians occupying Brasília buildings is essentially the standard brazilian protest. There's just no way you can convincingly claim that a thousand people armed with flags and bibles amounts to a coup or even an attempt at one. The only thing they did which you might object to was beg the military to launch an intervention.

The legal basis for that is a bit of brazilian law that dates back to our independence. It says the military is the so called "4th power", the "moderator power" which is supposed to intervene if the balance between the other three democratic powers gets too screwed up. That's exactly the situation we find ourselves in: unelected judge-kings that legislate and run the country. These protesters tried to invoke that bit of law by asking the brazilian military to intervene and put an end to it. They did not try to seize power for themselves, they asked the military to do it. The military refused to do it. Then they were arrested. Then the judges put them in a gulag.

Your comments have helped me in the past. Sad to see that you believe in this narrative.
> Paranoid is subjective. Assassination attempts are commonplace now.

What leads you to believe that?
Very cool! How does the optimized Pytoch code compare to the Jax implementation?
Having a clear system boundary is required for analysis.

Knowing that messages will be delivered 1+ times gives us a variety of ways we could choose to deal with this on the endpoint, with different vulnerabilities. (Getting "exactly once" processing usually requires making various kinds of resilience tradeoffs based on timing windows, storage requirements, etc).

> It seems a bit pedantic to deny that someone can fly from LA to New York

At this point I question your good faith. You're calling people out by name, and you're going full on "well, aktuallyyyy" and seeming to deliberately misunderstand other peoples' assertions. "People can't breathe underwater" v. "Well, once I was in a tunnel that was under a body of water, and I still breathed!(@!("

If you choose to define words differently than everyone else, you're just sabotaging your own communication to try and feel smart.
The question was whether to name it after a person or not. Those people would be equally upset if it was named Bisclock, so them being upset at the current site is not relevant to the naming discussion.
Not sure I agree that they are "lost in space". Even w/out a secondary embedding point to compare against, an embedding can be a starting place to explore from.

Intrinsic meaning is in the vector itself.
One of the features of PREEMPT_RT is that it converts interrupt handlers to running in their own threads (with some exceptions, I believe), instead of being tacked on top of whatever thread context was active at the time like with the softirq approach the "normal" kernel uses. This allows the scheduler to better decide what should run (e.g. your RT process rather than serving interrupts for downloading cat pictures).
I don't think the example was perfect which explains your wife's reaction.

Think of it more like the first delivery guy/girl left his/her car outside and wrote 123 on it. Then walked back.

The next one sees the car with a sign saying 123 and won't even ring the door bell or leave a package. Now you haven't gotten the package twice, it has not been delivered twice.

Sure you can complain that there's a car outside your home but in digital system you won't even see it. It would also cost the deliver firm a car for every package but that is not your problem and again, in the digital world the cost is a lot less than a car.

There is an argument that the street would be filled up with delivery vans ans there would be no more room for new deliveries to you or your neighbors but that is a limitation you could talk about. You probably can't handle an infinite number of packages delivered at the same time either and you won't wait an infinite amount of time for any specific package.

Try this version with your wife.
Wildlife experts warn of butterfly emergency as count reveals record low numbers
For static websites, I use GitHub Pages (or GitHub wiki), and for some of those websites custom domain. I edit websites static HTML/CSS locally, commit and push, or edit at GitHub website.

Installing Rails means installing very many Gem packages. That is just too much.
I don’t know why. Proving something is false is as good as proving something that is true. Knowledge moves forward. The public thinks that Okinawa and Greece have the highest longevity. Instead they have pension fraud and poor record keeping. That’s worth knowing.
> Are they storing all of their images in RAM?

That part would not matter regardless. RAM is powered at all times, kept being refreshed too. Unless, of course you mean, they'd have to keep buying new machines to store more pictures.
Understanding License Exceptions: What Developers Need to Know
I'd also throw in that HMAC is overrated. It's a workaround for bad hash algorithms that are vulnerable to length-extension attacks.

If you're using a "good" hash algorithm, then MAC-ing is simple: hash over your key and message.

It's pretty weird that SHA-256 has been king for so long, when SHA-512/256 (which, as I've noticed people don't understand, means SHA-512 truncated to 256 bits) was there from the beginning and is immune from this attack.

Anyway, in general it's a pet peeve of mine that many people so often say "HMAC" when really they just mean MAC.
You wrote in the post:

>This post was intended to be about human communication more than distributed systems or network protocols

But resorting to technical minutiae as you have done doesn't seem germane to "human communication". Honestly, seeing such mental gymnastics just to avoid losing face on an internet argument is really disappointing.
It seems like you can only turn the rebalancing points back into gift cards at best, which would make it really hard to turn your $6k into rent money at any scale.

I also feel like just one empowered customer service person with a banhammer could seriously curb the behavior in the article. The problem is that they're 'solving' the imbalances that they're creating, so its pretty detectable.
Do you consider it worse than conventional alternatives, such as artillery strikes, even if the latter is likely to result in a worse civilian casualty ratio?

Also, if booby traps aren't considered a legitimate tactic in a military conflict, why does noone complain when, say, Ukraine mines a field?
AI Helped Me Build My DIY App – DIY-It
Might be easier to digest in blog format. I think seeing all the different attention mechanisms in sequence in an article format would be nice. For sure is a great way to explain the image models to people curious about their failure cases and general workings.
I think that using 0.0.0.0 it's a bad idea. That is supposedly opening the port in all network interfaces, including the external ones. So, if you don't have a firewall (especially on the remote server) you are exposing something to the world.

OTOH if I'm going to use some tunnelling/port forwarding quite often, I would use the config file option, but for an one time or sporadic use, the command line option is better IMHO.
No, I'm saying its "sloppy" as a definition because while it addresses the distinction you ask about it, it doesn't fully cover what distinguishes exactly-once from at-most-once.

> The only way you can make it non-sloppy is to define "delivery" as being something that happens exclusively upstream of deduping.

"Deduping" can happen in many places. If it happens anywhere before the destination system end of the unreliable connection it is part of delivery (but also can't get you to exactly-once delivery). If it happens on the destination side of the unreliable communication channel, then yes, it's not part of the delivery guarantee, it is how you get exactly-once processing from at-least-once delivery. This has been well-known for a very long time. (I don't think it was new when I first encountered it in 1999.)
Indian filmmaker abandons human musicians for AI-generated music
I change the setting for the torch to only turn on with a long press, never turn it on by accident anymore
It does thanks. Sounds like "support plus access to future versions when released"

A pricing table might help here.
I don't want to get into a debate over semantics with you. You've redefined exactly once delivery to mean that if you have a layer of abstraction that hides that a message was delivered multiple times then it is "exactly once" delivery. That's not what exactly once delivery is. You clearly disagree but taking well understood and researched terms and redefining them to make a point is a complete waste of time for everyone. Nobody cares about what your personal definition of exactly once delivery is, they care about the definition that is used in literally all of distributed systems research.
Is there a better and more common alternative?
That's very neat. I don't get it from the preview, though: can I JUST TYPE the query, w/o all these silly menues?

One saved query is super restrictive though, basically means either pay, or don't even bother to install.
If you have an account. Rewrite works always.
Can we have Arc added to the title of the post to better alert people who use or know people who use the browser?
I'll send you an email.
LinkedIn counts of applicants aren’t real.

When you click “Apply” to see the job advert on the companies website and don’t actually apply, it still counts on LinkedIn. When I’ve done hiring in the past it’s said 100 applicants on my advert and then we’ve only had a few candidates.

With that said, Easy Apply jobs are pointless applying through. We got spammed so much we turned that off.
> touches grass

{..guiltily tries to remember the last time I touched grass with my hand..}
IIRC we paid 100% of our bills during the dispute period -- after subtracting the mistake over-spend.

In the end we got 100% credit (forgiveness)

You ultimately need to sell the vision to GCP that you are worth more to them alive than dead.

I would include in your pitch the 37 specific measures you have taken so this doesn't happen again. And if another service goes wild you will catch it within an hour or two.
HEIC is a standard too - it wasn’t a secret internal Apple project…
On desktop it follows the mouse no need to click.
I wonder if this is regression to the mean.

The technical limits of the early internet-- server resources being fairly costly, commercialization tools being limited-- meant silos were the only practical offering. Someone puts up a hobbyist forum on a Pentium in their basement, and gets the electric bill covered by asking for donations or pointing a single polite link in the footer to a friendly vendor.

What gets forgotten is that siloing serves some useful purposes. I don't want to read about anime in the same place I'm discussing vintage audio gear-- they draw different audiences and have different cultural norms, and I might want to show a different persona to each. Individual silos are also easier to curate and search.

The switch to giant "platforms for everyone" was less of an organic shift and more of a "solution in search of a problem." Improved scalability and rock-bottom costs make a 500-million-DAU site feasible, and maturing ad/tracking businesses that crave scale make it lucrative. These "improvements" never said anything about "this makes things better for users."

For a while, they could sell the "open sea" sites on the promise of "everyone's here" -- you went on Twitter to follow your favourite celebrities, or you joined Facebook to see how fat your classmates got, but eventually you realize there's no there there: the community isn't joined by any meaningful thread, and whatever tools that exist to create one are being undermined by algorithms that figured it's better NOT to give you what you actually came there for so you keep scrolling. Your aunt may as well not be on Facebook if her polite messages to friends are hidden behind 45 minutes of scrolling clickbait, distasteful politics and AI slop.

Smaller sites and the Fediverse/Threadiverse bring back the reason to join a specific community. I can get tightly focused content, pick instances that match my preferences and interests, and the signal-to-noise ratio is higher.

For a while, Reddit looked like it had what it takes to remain relevant-- if you thought of it as a network of forums with SSO and unified search, it had most of the appeal of classic siloed sites... except they decided to systematically burn goodwill with their community and chase everything that briefly made them the "un-Facebook".
Hilariously I have a totally empty circle in my control center. Maybe it was accessibility / contrast dimming before? It’s just broken now :)
> How We Found Bin Laden: The Basics of Foreign Signals Intelligence

Which one of them ? /s
You prefer that they wrap it in an .msi file and put it on that same website? What do you think the advantages of that are?
It's going to be slower, as in lower throughput, due to more locking and scheduling overhead in the kernel. Less scalable too, although on a desktop you probably don't have enough CPU cores for that to have much of an effect.

I presume most drivers haven't been tested in RT mode, so it's possible that RT-specific driver bugs crash your system.
Dude idk how this is so difficult.
At a gas station, in a well lit place near a road, with a worker inside, where you are only for 4 minutes... If someone heads in your direction that you don't like, you can be in your car in 2-3 seconds.. and drive away. Even if you left the pump in your car.

OR, you can be in an EV for 20 minutes... In a corner of a parking lot... And if someone comes up to your window... You can basically sit there and hope he doesn't have a free piece of ceramic to break your window and hold a knife to you until you give him whatever he wants.

I promise you, as soon as that class of criminal realizes EVs CAN NOT MOVE while plugged in, it's going to get weird.
Out of curiosity what stops you from romantic pursuits / marriage.
If don't want to answer I of course understand.
This is a big achievement after many years of work!

Here are a few links to see how the work is done behind the scenes.
Sadly arstechnica has only funny links and doesn't provide the actual source (why LinkedIn?).

Most of the work was done by Thomas Gleixner and team.
He founded Linutronix, now (I believe) owned by Intel.

Pull request for the last printk bits: https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=172623896125062&w=2

Pull request for PREEMPT_RT in the kernel config: https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=172679265718247&w=2

This is the log of the RT patches on top of kernel v6.11.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-...

I think there are still a few things you need on top of a vanilla kernel. For example the new printk infrastructure still needs to be adopted by the actual drivers (UART consoles and so on).
But the size of the RT patchset is already much much smaller than before. And being configurable out-of-the-box is of course a big sign of confidence by Linus.

Congrats to the team!
> linuxcnc aka emc2 runs linux under a real-time hypervisor

Historically it used RTAI; now everyone is moving to preempt-rt. The install image is now preempt-rt.

I've been on the flipside where you're streaming g-code from something that isn't hard-realtime to the realtime system. You can be surprised and let the realtime system starve, and linuxcnc does a lot more than you can fit onto a really small controller. (In particular, the way you can have fairly complicated kinematics defined in a data-driven way lets you do cool stuff).

Today my large milling machine is on a windows computer + GRBL; but I'm probably going to become impatient and go to linuxcnc.
what is the more secure way in you opinion? What is the weak link here? TLS transport? possibly compromised hosting/codebase? trust in app authors? not reading the shell script? checking a signature of some file?
Touchpad support very poor in Linux. I use System76 and the touchpad is always a roll of the dice with every kernel upgrade, despite it being a "good" distro / vendor
I think I paid $300AUD for mine. I was very poor in the 80's, I would not have been able to afford the equivalent of $1000USD. I have vague memories of them costing around 80 GBP, which would be ~350 GBP now, so about half that $1K (but definitely more than I paid for them now, so your point is at least partially true).

And yes, I would be willing to pay that kind of money now for a pair of boots that would last me a decade again.

It was also kinda the point back in the 80's; your Docs were an investment. They cost decent money, but they'd last a decade and became part of your identity. Practically a physical extension of your body; I had a flatmate who regularly fell asleep in his and eventually developed trenchfoot from doing that. The boots were fine, his feet weren't. Most of my friends back in the day had one pair of shoes; their Docs. It was worthwhile investing in them because that was all you needed.

I think you're also right that the brand itself has changed and moved down-market, so they're charging less than they used to for a lower-quality product. But this is kinda my point; the brand is now being cannibalised and turned into a low-quality fast-fashion product marketed with a high-quality brand. This is obviously not going to work long-term, as people realise that Docs are now shite. As I said, in ten year's time the brand won't be worth anything.
I honestly think the person that is to blame here is you. Yes, there might be some weird decisions here, but if you get so mad about those minor changes, you should make at least some research before updating.
Misinformation... According to whom?

You?

These partisan judge-kings?

Politicians who lie pathologically?

So who gets the honor of being the ministry of truth?
It is for me. I've had to disable it on my mbp and ios devices; otherwise DNS lookups choke.
They won't because Basecamp has a board view.
The kind of reliability I'm talking about where "100% reliable" is a reasonable assumption is inside the boundaries of a single server, i.e. a CPU, memory bus, and I/O peripherals including a NIC and non-volatile storage. Yes, things can and do fail inside that boundary, but if you start taking that into account things get much more complicated. You are also no longer in the realm of distributed systems at that point, which is the context in which the controversy about exactly-once delivery arises.
If you already starting from an existing set from publicly available sources, and you just need to standardize them amongst each other for consistency, then I can see how that would be kinda reasonable, though I'm no designer myself

perhaps things like giving them a consistent center or consistent brightness/contrast could be done programmatically as well, and maybe there are end user tools to do those things en masse

other tweaks such as selecting between subtle variations found in each icon, or adding some artistic modification, shadow mimicking, etc... can possibly be done, to align the set to a certain pre-defined theme now that I think about it more

seems like a pretty interesting kinda project actually

> Arts, crafts and sciences uplift the world of being and are conducive to its exaltation ~Baha'u'llah

the designer who chose to instead run with the money probably got insecure or bored, but they would probably be happier if they learned to appreciate the creative process more
Booby traps and land mines are legally distinct (and, within land mines, anti-personnel and anti-vehicle land mines are distinct), but its also not the case that no one complains about the use of mines, booby-traps, etc., by both parties in the Russia-Ukraine War.

https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/06/13/landmine-use-ukraine
This article is silly. Flexibility in your day is the reason remote workers are productive. Everyone has ups and downs in their day. When down, rather than staring unproductively at a screen in some cubicle somewhere, it is terrific to use those times to take care of something in your life. Whether it is moving some laundry or taking a nap... you get it done and you come back productive.

We are paid to get work done, not to burn specific hours in a chair.
Interestingly, I had the exact same reaction when trying to figure out how to enable/disable WiFi. Why Apple, why? I wonder what telemetry tells them about this icon - wouldn't it be one of the most used ones? Or is there maybe an incentive for Apple to make sure users have WiFi on that I don't understand.
For all we know, we live inside some large scale invisible jet and our entire understand of physics is really the exception rather than the rule
My layman understanding is that we don't have the theories or math to try and understand this so it's just a black box that we pretend to understand
Because I need to not just book the tickets and an arbitrary hotel. I need to get tickets with constraints - for one thing I’d like to have a bit more legroom on that 13 hour flight. For another, I need to also sit next to my wife and kid. Hotels can’t just be anywhere in Shanghai, they need to have decent reviews, be close to the things we want to see, and not be too expensive. I also need to arrange transportation to the things we need to see, and so on and so forth. A much simpler trip to Hawaii takes hours of digging through the piles of SEO enshittified garbage. It’s like this with nearly everything you want to buy or do. But I feel like we’re ratholing on trip planning too much.

Let’s do coding shall we? How about I just tell my editor, verbally or in writing, “refactor this method so that it does this and that and then update all call sites project-wide”? Or “would invariants of this program break if I do such and such”.

Or my DAW: “add a bit of dark plate reverb to the guitar, and fade out in the end”, or “isolate guitar and slow down the track in this file, and then loop this lick, I would like to learn it; oh and also tell me where I’m not playing it correctly”. Or “give me a backing blues track without the guitar that’d fit this chord progression”.

All of that without necessarily training the model exhaustively to do every combination of these things.

We could make programs _so much_ better than they currently are, it’s not even funny.
As I didn’t get that, it seems like the dev honors prefers-reduced-motion, and doesn’t display it in that case. Excellent of them, give joy to those who want it, prevent annoyances for those who hate them.
While it’s easier to have everything in one repo, Microsoft do have icon packs with svgs.