skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Judging by the git repo, brackets has been in development significantly longer than your project. It also seems much more complete already.

And your project doesn't seem to be designed as an IDE, but rather a blogging engine with a strange focus on code editing. How exactly are the projects similar?
Immigrants Played Role in Majority of U.S. Technical Patents, Study Finds
Meet Your Creator [Quadrotor symphony]
Switching this week. Bye bye Megapath/Speakeasy.
should include twitter as well
I think if you just say "no ticket transfers," scalping is pretty easy to defeat. 100% mandatory will call, no paper tickets, and they scan the credit card for the sale at the door. Popular solutions for high demand concerts.
I agree with you in theory, but I don't think the argument works here. If the shows are under-priced, they will sell out quickly. The dedicated fans will be the ones who know about the show and buy early.
"That is not correct. The efficiency boost comes from the very efficient transfer of heat from the CPU to the spinning fan/heat exchanger by, effectively, using the very thin air-gap under the impeller. The rotation of the impeller breaks the boundary layer in the airgap and you get good heat transfer across a very thin gap."

You misunderstood the physics involved. When they refer to thinning the boundary air, they are not talking about within the planar air gap binding. They are talking about the air within each of the impeller's channels.

The air in an air gap binding experiences positive pressurization. The proof of this is how the impeller lifts above the bearing surface. The pressure overcomes gravity in this case once the sheer within the gap is sufficient. While there is some mass exchange in and out of the gap, there is no significant volume moving through it. If you think about it, this makes sense, because the volume of flow would be limited by the surface area of the perimeter. Given that the gap is so slight, not much of a window for any flow. It is more like a captured air lubricant, and heat transfer through it is more conductive than convective.

Rather, they are talking about the boundary around the impeller itself, particularly with each vane channel. The air within these channels experiences a centrifugal force. This shrinks the boundary layer thickness over the impeller surface as a whole. If you think about it, the impeller has a lot more surface area than the gap. This is why getting a thinner boundary layer has a big benefit.

To simulate this you'll need not FEA but state of the art in CFD simulation that is aware of boundary layer effects and vortex flows.

Liquid cooling is very neat, especially for very large systems or high head loads. I think an important secondary benefit is that warm liquid is easier to use as an industrial energy input than a mass of warm air. But air only cooling devices have a big cost advantage, so if you can live with the performance constraints they offer, you'll probably be lower total cost.

The goal here is cost effectiveness, not a race to the highest score as a watt number.

"From my FEA work on heat transfer I know that you can only go so thin on blades before they become useless past a few millimeters above the heatsink base-plate. The same is the case here."

The impeller is doing double duty: radiating heat and moving air. While I believe you about the value of fins in a radiating surface, here they're optimizing against two effects, so I think it's plausible that taller fins result in more flow per vane.

"What I can see is the use of this concept to create a fluid based solution that uses a liquid to quickly move heat from a CPU to a much larger heat ex-changer that uses the Sandia heatsink to move heat into the surrounding air, and, thereby, cool the CPU."

I think once you've suffered the costs of putting the heat into a liquid, a passive radiator is going to be better at getting it to the air per dollar, because you're no longer constrained to compact geometry.
I've been saying this for a while too.

There's no such thing as online privacy - privacy is dead.

It's better that the default for most things online is public since any privacy setting is just an illusion of security. Of course there are some notable exceptions to this (encrypted backup services that encrypt locally before backup), but for the most part if it's online and at least some other people can see it - everyone can see it.
Is anyone looking? Hell, the people that take them don't even look at them. My wife and I spent a year travelling in Asia, and took a billion pictures (10K?). I'm sure 8500 haven't been viewed except in a page of thumbnails, and of the 1500 that have been viewed, there's probably 50 that have been viewed more than once or twice.

Perhaps its a technology question: maybe there isn't a suitably engaging discovery tool on my desktop to get me into my own library. Or perhaps the human capacity to enjoy our photographic progeny is just exceeded by our capacity to produce.
Are we debating? I don't think we are. I think "send it to legal@" was poor messaging; "send it to finance@" would have accomplished the same thing without escalating the situation.

Having said that: "send it to legal@" is not "breach of contract". Sorry, it just isn't.
I wrote a long email to everyone on our launch list this week. I was scared to do it beforehand, but long emails are actually OK. Well, they're better than ok. I got a phenomenal response.

The trick with long emails is, you have to say something interesting, write in an honest and open way, and people have to care about your subject matter.

With Louis C.K., I don't just like his comedy, I want him to succeed. And when I pay him for his video specials, or buy tickets for his live show, I feel like I'm helping him win, and helping us all win. If you can send an email to make your customers feel like he does me, you'll do very well for yourself.
Too much work, too little done
As a parent, I look at the samples provided and think, "WTF?" At 13, your kid "might finally be able to accept the responsibility of taking the trash out"?

I love my kids, but I know a critical part of raising them is pissing them off on a fairly regular basis (also known as saying "No" :). My 13 year old daughter really likes that.

More importantly, it is better to raise them to understand their real place in the world (which is not "everybody gets a medal for participating"; I really want to punch whoever decided that was a good idea). Life is hard, people will piss on you. If you've been coddled your whole life, that is going to be a painful experience when it happens.

On the other hand, if your parents have 1) given you a strong foundation of love and self-respect and 2) positioned you to know you have to work your way up, you'll usually do OK.

(Note: I'm not saying I'm perfect. There are things I'd do differently and my fourth is getting a different parenting experience than my first, but, overall, with various crap they've all had to deal with, they are continuing to do well. So far, it's success.)
Writing a book on Modern Perl is nuts.

I've written two.

Perl changes so often that writing about it is like trapping a unicorn.

Not really. I document things with staying power. For example, I documented only the parts of smart match that are easy to explain. Everything else is up for debate, and thus not really worth recommending. (Besides, I'm not trying to replace the documentation.)
DeviantART is applying to manage .art
Android isn't a household brand. Apple is.
i wish google I/O did that.
Well they (Eligible) have already demonstrated a flagrant disregard for other people with this whole incident.
Does that mean I'm also an expert at learning and exploring new ideas? Sounds good to me :)
I don't think anyone is going to say that Haskell's type classes in any way fit the traditional notion of a type. It's more the exception that proves the rule in this case.
Most of the shared bits of Darwin and FreeBSD are the userland and (I think?) libc.
I think we probably agree here. I was just pointing out that your alternative suggestion (how_serious_are_you@) might not be much of an improvement from a business point of view over the original (fuckoff@). Ultimately, asking someone to contact legal@ is still significantly escalating a situation where there appears to be very little potential upside from doing so, whatever the underlying intent might be.
Show HN: A CLI for Domai.nr
The biggest part of the graveyard is the profitable part of nearly every print newspaper.
Why is anyone surprised by this? Apple's product shop is run by designers, backed up by supply chain managers and engineers. Google's is run by engineers, backed by engineers, dealing with a mob of third party engineers at their hardware partners. Google's approach is destined to crank out mediocrity.

Microsoft's taking of the reins of their own hardware future speaks to their frustration at the inevitability of that mediocrity.

Apple's approach cranks out excellence... at the expense of incurring risk. Risk that they'll bet the farm on something like the Cube or Siri and fall flat on their face. So far they've rolled the dice and won.
That would piss people off. A lot of people have to change tickets not because of scalping but because of change of plans, etc. This is especially true for big ticket shows were you are supposed to book in advance.
They are redirected to the couch surfing site.
1940's test for radio announcers
its me. what's happening? ohuhoh nevermind :) Got shocked lol
Typosquatter Used Misspelled Domains to Intercept Email; $1 Million Lawsuit
Using Clojure was a bliss. And I'm the person, who didn't want to deal with Lisp at all before (however I always loved FP).

Using pure ClojureScript was for the first a bit limiting because there is no simple way to browse the DOM, e.g. However, with the jayq lib (a jQuery wrapper) it got really simple. You also have to adapt to the fact, that objects like String and Integer (obviously) have another API on the JS platform. Everything else was as beautiful as Clojure — no need for Underscore.js anymore!

I would definitely recommend to anyone to try this stack out. The only concerns I have is the ClojureScript's performance. Due to functional programming approach and laziness it might happen, that a lot more implicit objects will be created, that any GC-strategy of the JS engine might assume. So I have really no idea how the performance of ClojureScript will be in really heavy computational client applications.
If Everyone Got BBC Through Netflix, Could It Wipe 80% Off BBC Revenues?
Not sure if this has always been a "feature" of Facebook's email service, but apparently you can login with the facebook email address. A would-be hacker only needs to guess your password.

Case in point: a friend has already told me there have been renewed attempts to log into her account from other locations and devices.
So said the Inuit, when presented with "the world's coldest ice cubes". The problem, it turns out, isn't the marketing claim.
Specializing allows you to target the ones who do. Cast a wide net across "local businesses" and you're going to get a lot of boots and toilet seats to keep your tuna company.
YouTube videos freeze at view count of 301
Auxin, I did a science project on this in 5th or 6th grade. My father helped me rig up a centrifuge-like apparatus that would spin seeds at what was supposed to simulate greater than earth gravity. I remember doing research (reading) about auxins and coming to the conclusion that higher gravity would stunt plant height.
Why Apple Doesn’t Have Its Own Music Streaming Service
That would work, but as I mentioned before there can be a lot of innocent ticket transfers due to people changing plans, etc. These do not result in price increases or artificial supply restrictions. You do not want to actually prevent these (even if they are technically contractually prohibited) because you will piss off a lot of your fans.
I've studied Christensen's three main books; I find them very appealing but I'm not quite convinced by the component-vs-integrated idea.

While an integrated approach can squeeze out more performance, does it predict industry structure? Here, it's true that the iPhone's integration greatly aids its performance; and performance is certainly needed in this market.

But (IBM) PC's were never integrated... and performance was certainly in demand in that market (for years and years people would keep buying faster PCs). And, to compare them with Apple's Macs at that time (which were integrated, just like the iPhone), PC's often had better performance per buck than Macs.

Christensen argues that this is because the performance enhancement was more due to particular components (especially the CPU), rather than their integration. Thus, those key components became the focus for improvement. So, the result of Intel improving CPUs (for example) was that the performance of the whole PC increased. This saves the theory... in fact, he turns it around, and points out that Intel CPUs were integrated internally in order to get that performance.

While I do find this very interesting, I get the feeling of post hoc analysis in too many of his examples... and a theory that doesn't predict the future is just not quite compelling for me. :-)

BTW: Christensen says that integrated and component approaches have different strengths, and which one wins depends on what that market needs. If the market is desperate for performance (and will pay a premium for it), then an integrated approach will be more popular and profitable. But if the market doesn't really care about performance, but instead wants something that is customizable, then a component approach will win. Markets change over time. Typically, some feature gets better until it's "good enough" (most people won't pay for more of it). He claims there's also an alternation between the levels of a system: if "integration" wins at one level, then "componentization" wins at the parts that are integrated e.g. PC's were not integrated, but their parts (CPUs, HDD etc) were integrated internally... but the parts used within them switched back to being not integrated.
Push Humanity Forward - The Future is Ours
Escalating the situation or overtly signaling displeasure is a bad strategy.

Expressing passive skepticism and slow-rolling an invoice you don't believe you should pay is not a bad strategy, at least not always. There is an upside to it.
using encryption it's completely possible to make any information exchange as secure as it can possibly be without accounting for humans on the other end leaking the information.
One thing is I have ADD. I run into mental blocks sometimes and can't get started on some things. Or I make transposition errors. These occur in times and places that make no logical sense. Analytical geometry, but only to a lesser extent in trig, and not so much in calculus. Similarly in chemistry, subatomic orbitals are fine but molecular orbitals, which are conceptually simpler, are not.

Similarly in chemistry lab, I could help anyone else but I would invariably run all the right tests on all the wrong samples. This made me a great lab partner but a disaster on my own.

As I have gotten older I have learned coping mechanisms but some things I can't do and I pass those onto others.

At the same time I have always been top of my class in many things, while putting in quite a bit less effort than average. These ranged from history to some of the sciences, to some cases of math (calculus, some algebra).
Do you want to be successful?
"We can also apply the same ideas to JavaScript development. Smash the Quick Edit key on a function call and Brackets opens an inline editor with the JavaScript function body ready for edit. Instead of managing documents, developers can dive in and out of their code with ease."

What, not a single mention of Light Table?
When you type the words "web design agency", it makes me think that the right answer is "do not test". The projects more often than not are just not big enough to justify it.
Wouldn't a better title be: "Why Apple doesn't have its own music subscription service"
My first stab at being useful.
Are they trying to screw us or trying to predict what they think we want?
I'm an American, with no international kid raising experience. But I'd say that declaring that "All Americans are raised spoiled" is an overly broad/general. America is an ENORMOUS country. These studies seem to focus on the Urban/large metropolitan suburban families. I'd wager that the rate of spoiledness varies vastly when geographic or economic conditions are examined. Whitey McMoney from the Upper East Side is going to be raised quite a bit different from the poor black kids in Queens. Both will be way way off the mark from where a midwestern farm kid will be.

Overall, what I'm trying to say is, I think the research behind this article has too small of a sample size.
Facebook Inlog.nl / Link Verwijderen van Facebook / Login Button / Tijdlijn 
Facebook is the safest one site among social networking websites. Users staying in touch with family and friends discover old friends and get friendship with new friends. If you are away from Facebook, you lost something in your days.
Summary of the video

This was interesting question that was answered, but it's becoming an annoying trend to have 10-minute videos of things that can explained in a few sentences. Here's basically everything the video had to say:

Q: When you submit a video to YouTube, why the does view count grow nicely hour by hour, 6 views, 57 views, 188 views, and so on, but then seems to get stuck at 301 views and doesn't advance from there for a long time?

A: YouTube doesn't do much checking on the veracity of videos that get <= 300 views. The 300 was an arbitrary threshold that no one remembers the origin of. As of 301 views, YouTube will apply more sophisticated video analytics to check for cheating against the view count (by bots, etc.).

Once a video reaches a view count of 301, it'll stay stuck there for a half day or full day until YouTube does the video analytics, after which they will allow the count to be updated if it was not found to be fraudulent.
Go has some really great features, I've written a few thousand lines in it and enjoyed it, but there are some strange hangups that the go designers have that in the end make me think its going to go nowhere.

1. Rob Pike is immensely proud that the language has no generics, but this means that in the last 2 years, there isnt a proper implementation of a linked list that can hold an arbitrary type, or a min-heap, an ordered map, or a b-tree, or any one of countless data structures that one can take for granted in every other language. And yes, there are implementations that take interfaces, but you have to very odd-looking casts to coerce values in and out of them.

2. Go - or its testing support - doesnt allow a simple assert or EQUALS macro, simply because Rob believes everything should be done with if/then structures. Along with error handling, this makes go tests painful to read.

3. Idiosyncratic handling of pointers and values, leading to confusion everywhere and accidental copies and bugs where people pass by value accidentally because its extremely easy to.

4. Channels aren't really that useful beyond small programs (IMHO, maybe I'm wrong), and by making them synchronous any non-trivial go concurrent program has to reason very carefully to avoid deadlocks.

There are countless similar things. People will put up with these idiosyncracies for a while but move on in the end.
Screenshots for those of us stuck behind the paywall: http://imgur.com/a/VtNRf
You know what? Use that same GET method from the about page, mine for certain words, display analytics on a dashboard next to a stream and you've probably just put a few social media "consultants" out of work.

/dastardlyGrin
That's awesome, thanks .. how does it work? I mean why does it allow google to bypass their paywall.
Fun project!
I love the alternate ideas Louis CK has brought to the table and like the fact that he's taken things into his own hands and been able to get gigs despite all that's against him. Two shows at the Kennedy Center? How cool is that?

As much as I don't want to believe this I feel that scalping is ultimately a means of market correction. If he sells tickets for one show in a city at $45 I imagine that he's a popular enough comic that the price would be higher than that due to the limited supply of Louis. Unless he has a really good way of preventing reselling there will be plenty of opportunists out there looking to sell their $45 ticket for $70 if they can.

I think the solution to this would be to better price tickets so that at least he's profiting off his hard work instead of scalpers. Could he auction each individual seat? the best seats might fetch ridiculous amounts of money but the worst seats in the house might go for say less than $45 and give fans a chance at seeing him.
I think enabling better computing, independently of entry level know-how, to be something that sometimes has amazing effects. That is why I asked if you had that happen.

I still remember when a neighbour came by and explained to me some Basic on the spectrum and how that led to me wanting to buy a motorola assembler book some years later. And how that turned me to being interested in softice and all that came later... that is why I asked.

I mostly like v8 because it runs three.js stuff crazy fast.
Google's 'brain simulator'
That's awesome! Try running the JS file - clearly, it should be included in every site. And check out the source of the page.
One's a real latino and the other is fake latino.
ASK PG: Would you invest a penny in this startup?
The original article appears is
http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.6209
(as noted in the article).

I did only print it (yet), but from the abstract it appears that they did mainly tried face recognition, not trying to find cats.
That's the point. If they were doing their job and interrogating well as well as investigating well they'd catch them all just like Sabu. Unfortunately they're not and it's easier to offer a plea deal after a short period of intimidation so they do that. I think they should all pay, but this way they just abuse something built into the system that was made as an incentive for people they didn't think they COULD catch otherwise.
Choosing the right technologies for a hackathon
Once you're in "signature crosshairs", you can actually click anything that looks like a horizontal line (like signature lines), and a properly-sized signature will be drawn.
"Americans are like a rich father who wishes he knew how to give his son the hardships that made him rich." - Frost
Well, this is actually a good thing given Facebook's mission, "Making the world more open and connected."

To do this, you have to have public profiles. Do you want your personal email to show up on public profiles? But Facebook email, on the other hand, probably doesn't matter (at least not right now when the "open" paradigm is still in infancy.). Its OK to be shown to random people and search engines and other features that come down the pipeline.
I don't believe they are increasing prices, but rather showing different, better quality hotels that are pricier to Mac users.
I don't get it - did he actually email legal@ and get a negative response, or are we just spawning internet lynch mobs the second we run into the slightest amount of resistance now?
Species-Specific Microbes May Be Key to a Healthy Immune System
Podcast: What Is Wrong With Flipkart?
I find it odd that people are surprised by things like this. The information is very public.
Nor is your claim that malware hasn't affected your life using Windows in the last 10 years. Even if it's actually true, it's at least a 4-sigma event.
Flipkart CEO responds to our cover story