skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Some societies had the norm to punish gay people, at least many learned that was wrong

Somehow it's mainly the ones who sells their body and not the ones who buy them who get punished.

Buying is more often voluntarily than selling.
freaky-flowers was cool. How does it work?
I think they’re likely using MLX in house now, no? (Probably not everyone, ofc - but seems likely that many will just use the native array framework designed explicitly for MX chips)
> Do you look up symbols in the IDE?

Yes.

> What about finding all symbols in a package?

I do not know what exactly you mean here, but I look for stuff like "all methods" or "implementations" in IDE.

> I use inline IDE documentation a lot but still also use the online or offline copy of the HTML reference manual.

I literally never ever use offline copy of the HTML manual nor need a need for it. I use online copy when google lands me there - but typically I then find the same thing in IDE, because then I see also a source code and have generally great experience.

To me, having to read manual online is a fail of documentation.
In the aerospace industry, and other safety critical industries, they use the "swiss cheese" model for risk analysis. For an accident to get through all the layers (slices of cheese) meant to stop accidents, you need the holes in all of those layers to line up in just the wrong way. When that happens you need to investigate and fix each layer of cheese, not focus on the single layer of cheese on the top and ignore the rest. You will never build reliable safety critical systems with the mentality that only a single point of responsibility needs to be identified and corrected.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_cheese_model
The Prince we never knew
You misunderstand the situation.

If I give ChatGPT-4 the original farmer riddle, it "solves" it just fine, but it's assumed that it isn't actually solving it. That is, it's not thinking or doing any logical reasoning, or anything resembling that to come to a solution to the problem, but that it's simply regurgitating the problem's solution since it appears in the training data.

Giving ChatGPT-4 the modified farmers riddle, and having it spit out the incorrect, multi-step solution, is then proof that the LLM isn't doing anything that can be considered reasoning, but that it's merely repeating what's assumed to be in its training data.

ChatGPT-o1-preview correctly managing to actually parse my modified riddle, and then not simply parroting out the answer from the training corpus but give the right solution, as if it read it carefully, then says something about the improved logical and deductive reasoning capabilities of the newer model.
Wow. Best yet.
And still, I switched to C# now and I have to tell, my overall java productivity was massively better. Better tooling, better code analysis, better literally everything.
>but there is no way of telling how many sexual contacts my new partner had, whether paid for or not.

The same is true for their clients but they don't get the same treatment.
Troubled Blood isn't marketing transphobia save in the mind of a reviewer with an axe to grind wrt Rowling's public statements.

The wikipedia page outlines the charge that it contains "pernicious anti-trans tropes" and continues:

Nick Cohen, writing for The Spectator, argued that the transphobia accusations were baseless and slanderous, noting that Dennis Creed is investigated along with a dozen other suspects.

He also stated that the book does not engage in the politics of women-only spaces and access to gender reassignment treatments.

Alison Flood, writing for The Guardian, expressed similar views, arguing that people who have not read the book were making wrong assumptions based on a single review.

Allan Massie, writing for The Scotsman, stated of the character of Creed that "there is no suggestion that he was transgender".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troubled_Blood
I've gotten this as well, on very short code snippets. I type in a prompt and then sometimes it doesn't respond with anything, it gets stuck on the thinking, and other times it gets halfway through the response generation and then it gets stuck as well.

https://chatgpt.com/c/66e3a628-2814-8012-a6c5-33721b78cb99
o1-mini does better than any other model on zebra puzzles. Maybe you got unlucky on one question?

https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1ffjb4q/prelimi...
If you take a video of taking a shit mostly no one is gonna think you're immoral or shameful but if there's videos plastered everywhere of you shitting on cam for cash then it could be detrimental to your social standing.
Why would they only have a small write cache?

You can map a lot of memory from pcie
Astrophysicist claims he has cracked the code for time travel
As much as I am in favor of cutting red tape, medical devices should not be received in 30 days max.
That's the expression problem right ?
I'd say lack of empathy correlates better with people that ascrible lack of empathy to groups of people they don't like.
Pico-ASHA: USB audio to ASHA adapter
As others have pointed out, tkinter is just a wrapper around Tk, so the best way to learn more about it is to learn about Tk. The documentation for Tk [1] is fairly comprehensive: for example, the algorithm used by the `pack` command that you asked about is explained here: [2].

It's definitely worth learning at least some very basic Tcl if you want to get as much as possible out of tkinter - sometimes you end up having to use `widget.tk.eval()` to use a Tk feature that tkinter doesn't provide a good wrapper for.

[1] https://www.tcl.tk/man/tcl/TkCmd/contents.html
[2] https://www.tcl.tk/man/tcl/TkCmd/pack.htm#M27
OTOH this is not the same as "VHS" porn of the past decades.

A few decades ago, there weren't that many "productions", performers were much fewer and some porn performers name were known by anyone, regardless if you had seen porn with them staring or not. A person getting out of the business and trying to make a new career would have a high chance of meeting people, especially men, in real life who might have seen at least one movie.

Nowadays pornhub and onlyfans are flooded by wannabee independent performers. Even the most addicted to porn can't possibly follow and keep track of more than a tiny subset of performers. So there is a good chance you can still have a career alongside it or switch from OF to a non sex related career easily.
This is truly the new model's answer ? It's pretty similar to 3.5's "reasoning" actually:

In this context, "3.10" and "3.11" should be interpreted as decimal numbers, not as numbers with more digits.

When comparing:

3.9
3.10 (which is equal to 3.1)
3.11 (which is equal to 3.11)
We have:

3.9 is greater than 3.1 (3.10), because 9 is larger than 1.
3.11 is greater than 3.9, because 11 is larger than 9.
Thus, 3.11 is the largest of the three numbers.
And the more it is diluted by the sheer number of people involved in it.
Yeah, it is helped by the geography. The channel in Copenhagen isn't a river, it is directly open to the North+Baltic seas, so we don't have this runoff type challenge of other European cities.
Great initiative! As a relatively late swimmer (started learning in my thirties), more people should be able to swim.

I was expecting to see a map or list of places/cities to find out whether it’s safe to swim. But it seems that is not part of this initiative?
Yeah, in my city it's not that bad in the canals, but we have PFAS and GenX thanx to Chemours, down south we have 3M from Belgium dumping PFAS. Other rivers have crap from Germany.

They say: You can swim, it's not that bad, but eat 1-2 fish from said river and you're over the max your body could (theoretically) safely ingest for a year.
SEC mobile phones can signal an imminent stock price drop
Bern is probably my favorite swimmable city
Yah my mum was helping out with the family business around age 5. It's kind of crazy to think how quickly its swung from having that kind of responsibility thrust on you from so young to now where people in their mid 20s may still be in their "incubatory" period
https://archive.md/bvF79
There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:20
This is approximately what I figured. Whenever I do deeper due diligence, this sort of scam comes up. Literally "whenever."

For the record, Nebula is primarily owned and operated by creators. Those creators are:

* Dave Wiskus

* Brian McManus (Real Engineering)

* Alex (LowSpecGamer)

* Devin Stone (Legal Eagle)

* Thomas Frank

* Sam Denby (Wendover Productions)

The other creators are getting scammed.

This is not an uncommon model. This is almost identical to how edX was structured and the marketing literature is nearly identical too. It was owned and run by universities. Just not the universities who made up the "consortium."

If there were no scam, there would absolutely no reason for the non-public non-answers. If Nebula weren't scamming, they would disclose the "financial and legal wizardry."

None of this prevented me from giving Nebula money. As I said, this kind of issues comes up literally every time I do due diligence. I am disappointed in specifically Brian McManus for being involved in a scam, but this kind of scam is omnipresent with quite literally every organization I've done due diligence on, and usually much worse.
I included that note because output limits are a personal interest of mine.

Until recently most models capped out at around 4,000 tokens of output, even as they grew to handle 100,000 or even a million input tokens.

For most use-cases this is completely fine - but there are some edge-cases that I care about. One is translation - if you feed in a 100,000 token document in English and ask for it to be translated to German you want about 100,000 tokens of output, rather than a summary.

The second is structured data extraction: I like being able to feed in large quantities of unstructured text (or images) and get back structured JSON/CSV. This can be limited by low output token counts.
Chatbots can chip away at belief in conspiracy theories
stray has a pretty dark and foreboding atmosphere, the rats fit right in imo. seconding the other commenter who recommended little kitty big city though, i didn't expect to enjoy it as much as i did.
I see discussions on Reddit periodically where it makes long term relationships complicated.

I’m an old married guy, but I can’t imagine dating and then finding out that the person you were involved with was doing that type of thing. In a friend group I wouldn’t even blink.

Based on the conversations I see, this seems to be a common experience.
Hey, I got a random serious comment about nuclear power :-)))

To your point:

> No amount of batteries can protect a solar/wind grid from an arbitrarily extended period of "bad" weather.

Like nuclear winter caused by a nuclear power plant blowing up and everyone confusing the explosion with the start of a nuclear war? :-p

On a more serious note:

> No amount of batteries can protect a solar/wind grid from an arbitrarily extended period of "bad" weather. It's like range anxiety in an electric car. If you have N days of battery storage and the sun doesn't shine for N+1 days, you're in trouble.

We still have hydro plants, wind power, geothermal, long distance electrical transmission, etc. Also, what's "doesn't shine"? Solar panels generate power as long as it's not night and it's never night all the time around the world.

Plus they're developing sodium batteries, if you want to put your money somewhere, put it there. Those will be super cheap and they're the perfect grid-level battery.
Tech industry rushes to give AI greater decision-making abilities
I’ve seen Costco sell AirPod Pros for $170 or $180 a couple times a year.
With a mechanism for AGI we don't comprehend at all.

Airplanes don't fly by flapping their wings.
> They're not trying to attract only Apple, they're trying to attract businesses in general.

Ok, so this is about circumventing the 15% minimum corporate tax?

Is this somehow related to the objectives of directive 2022/2523? It seems to me that 2022/2523 is in place mostly to prevent transfer of profits from one jurisdiction to another to minimize the tax on profits generated elsewhere.

Unless, let's say, a Germany corporation registered in Ireland would somehow be affected by electricity costs or healthcare costs covered by the Irish government, I'm not sure if the benefit is large enough to matter.

Obviously, for companies with most operations happening within Ireland, the total tax pressure has a larger effect. But I don't think that was the type of problem this directive was designed to solve.
cue teenagers with "hearing problems" so they must wear the pods during classes in 3 .. 2 ..
That's not even the worst of its sins. The official part of the page is often incomplete, doesn't tell about important edge cases or differences between win and *nix. Also it is regularly flat out wrong.

Sometimes the comments are all screaming about how bad the doc is, then all give an inconsistent variant of the truth.
I don't follow? Why is that funny? Why wouldn't she be able to be a film producer?
We're moving YC to 4 batches/year
I read as far as this being based on an interview with the Diary of a CEO guy. No thanks. He’s a terrible interviewer who doesn’t care about the topics, he asks questions just relevant enough give the appearance of him being at all interested but there’s nothing of substance. Similar to his career it seems. I’d rather listen to ChatGPT interview someone.
Sure, your cases are perfectly reasonable. I just wish the LLMs had a "feel" about when to output long or short text. Always thinking about adding something like "be as concise as possible" is kinda tedious
I think there's plenty of people who the internet or gossip circles hate where that hate is unjustified. At the same time, a lot of the worst people are initially quite personally charming and keep that face even as they screw you over. And I think when people come into contact that they've only heard about in gossip in person, there's quite often an attempt to be like "well that's the caricature of Larry Ellison, maybe he's not actually that bad". Face to face contact can weight quite heavily compared to "people on the internet".

Combine the two of them and you get a recipe for people to give Larry Ellison the benefit of the doubt, taking a "well we're adults, let's handle this more maturely than immediately doubting our counter party" stance, even as people who by their own accounts had heard otherwise. Ultimately in this case, Cantrill's experience proved "the internet" right, but I think even that might not prevent someone else repeating the same situation in the future.
Weird signal that baffled seismologists traced to mega-landslide in Greenland
Fun little article. Though I feel like using a VESA driver is cheating. Fine enough if all you need is a basic framebuffer for something like MS Office, but even something like video playback would probably bring it to a crawl
Why does embedding the documentation into the source code make it weaker? The author can put as much or as little effort into the documentation as they want either way.
Does 25519 suffer from key/data-dependant execution time?

Is this implementation resistant to that?

If it isn't, it's kinda a footgun which shouldn't be published for general use.
While it is true that "lesson" is commonly used like that nowadays (and it's helpful that dictionaries explain this), it derives from latin "lection" which means ~reading~, related to "lecture". "Learning" is a germanic word and its meaning is closer to "acquiring knowledge". "Lektion" exists in germanic languages too and both its original and modern meaning is closer to "text being read".

If you're looking for a distinction between learning and lesson, this is the distinction you want.
> I was very obviously only making a joke.

I know; it was a tentative to make the thread more serious than these snarky, unconstructive comments.
> Shadow Equity (sometimes called Phantom Stock) isn’t real stock. It’s basically just an IOU that’s worth the same dollar value as the actual stock. The creators will get paid 50% of the proceeds in the event the company sells, but legally they don’t actually own any of the company.

To my untrained eye, this just seems like owning stock without voting privileges, which seems okay? Is the fear that the voters will eventually just change the creator profit sharing to zero and milk the company dry rather than selling it?
OP is talking about substituting a Kubernetes setup. FreeBSD was never in the cards. 99% of companies in the cloud don’t run or care about anything other than Linux.
That's because academia doesn't actually do software engineering, it does computer science.
Add a touch of charm and personality to your belongings with this delightful pink-themed sticker sheet! Featuring a variety of 20 unique stickers, this collection is perfect for decorating notebooks, laptops, phone cases, and more. Each sticker is designed with intricate details and vibrant shades of pink, making them stand out beautifully.
Good reminder. Why did OpenAI talk about o1 and not release it? o1-preview must be a stripped down version: cheaper to run somehow?
The video game business is very similar to the film or literary publishing business. You need to publish ten novels for one to do well enough financially to pay off the others. Nobody really knows why that one worked. It's possible to do a few sequels, but the formula quickly becomes boring.

No one can guarantee the commercial success of a novel, film or video game.
That would make sense if writing a program would be similar to randomly drawing a program from a pot of programs.

If instead I have a good idea what I want to write, the type system may either guide me towards the solution, or hinder me. It usually hinders me, I don't need a type system to guide me, but I like a type system that can check for trivial errors (oh, I meant to pass a list of numbers, not just a single number).
In general LLMs seem to function more reliably when you use pleasant language and good manners with them. I assume this is because because the same bias also shows up in the training data.
All while pocketing the listing fee.
That's actually quite clever in a devious way: by giving app developers the control over blocking sideloading, Google essentially sidesteps the requirement to be fully open.

They can now just point to the developers: it's them, not us!
I was aware of that, but I would still be interested to know the actual costs. I do not think "it is ok to blog about potential fraud in scientific publications because GoFundMe will pay for my lawyers" is a good assumption for most individuals.

I see people saying it is a win for open science, and I just look at that Court Listener page and it still fills me with angst.
I don't disagree about snobbery, but there's a huge difference between drinks such as instant coffee, drip-machine coffee and correctly brewed, fresh coffee.

I can't bring myself to drink instant coffee any more and will choose any kind of tea in preference to having to suffer the insult of instant "coffee". Drip-machine coffee at least uses real coffee, but in most people's hands leads to a horribly over-extracted brew and typically it's using supermarket-bought stale pre-ground coffee.

If you want to taste nice/good coffee, it can be made relatively cheaply. Buy some whole roasted beans (pre-ground coffee goes stale before it even hits the supermarket shelves), a decent hand burr grinder and an Aeropress device.

If you want to go for an electric bean grinder, ensure that it's a burr grinder as blade grinders are not suitable - they produce a wide variety of particle sizes which means that the small/dust bits get over-extracted and the larger particles are under-extracted. You could try sieving out the unwanted larger and smaller bits, but it's easier to just get a good grinder. For using an Aeropress, you can get away with a "cheaper" burr grinder, but if you want to make home espressos, then you probably want to be spending a LOT on a decent grinder as that will make the most difference to the quality of the espresso.
I feel like Kubernetes is always randomly mentioned in rants like this. Instead of saying your hardened VM has Docker you could have just said it has kubelet on it. Then instead of a bunch of ad hoc "docker services" you could pay pennies for a k8s control plane that gives you control over everything on those VMs. I fail to see how your way is anything but worse.

The bad cloud infrastructure is when people try to use every single thing AWS sells and their whole infrastructure is at super high levels of abstraction that they could never migrate to another platform. K8s isn't that at all.
Welcome to millennial reality, we don't begrudge anything non-harmful that people had to do to make ends meet.

I know too many people with masters degrees and student loans working food service to not think OF is smart if you can find your niche.
People who write newspaper articles get their facts consistently wrong on almost every subject.
Hooking Up Fly Metrics (2021)
None of these commenters actually use OnlyFans, because there's literally a free tier option to subscribe. You still need a credit card to sign up because they obviously want to reduce the friction for subscribing or paying for extra content. I've seen a lot of models that will use Twitter > Free OF > Paid OF funnel. Twitter is mostly soft-core / flirty, Free OF has some nudity, typically no videos, and the Paid OF is where most of explicit content is.

Revenue wise, you'll make a lot more money tailoring content to a small group of users who will pay for custom content / live cams etc than having any mass appeal with small donations. The large social media funnel is mostly there to get model's content out there to find the whales.

Context: I have a side business deploying chat LLMs for OnlyFans models for fans to "talk" to that's currently at 65k/MRR. It definitely helps with user retention, as models who chat to their fans will have a 2x or 3x spend rate per fan.
Is there some place this has been tried? How long has the experiment been going on? How long until we can definitively say that it worked?
I find Dockerfile's even simpler to work with than bash scripts.
> So there is a good chance you can still have a career alongside it or switch from OF to a non sex related career easily.

I have no comment on the morals and ethics but as far as modern technology goes; most if not all of OnlyFans finds its way to darkweb | pirate | hoarder megasites where there's always a few because-we-can obsessed techlords training facial recognition, gait recognition, and seeding AI generated VR porn engines, etc.

We can be certain that any woman with an OnlyFans portfolio will face that being dragged up later in their life if they are at all slightly public.

They do have the modern available hand wave explaination of "deepfake by weird ex" that becomes more and more believable each passing day.
For a short time I was thinking perhaps Ubuntu Core [0] could be such a thing. But the focus is different now (TVs perhaps never were). Still, Nvidia really mascaraed their shield line with (inappropriate at times) ads on its home screen, and they aren't even an ad company...

[0] https://ubuntu.com/internet-of-things
"Fact-checking itself" is poor phrasing. Fact checking requires external, authoritative sources. Not internal hallucinations.
The complexity of this solution just shot up from "2 minute hack" to "2 month research project, minimum". It's understandable why they didn't do this.
... and why is it called the same as the Nebula Awards?