skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In my experience driving them. I like manual buttons and safety. Granted, the Tesla was the first car I bought and it was an amazing car in and of itself, but the ICE experience was far better. The software side sucks (I don't know why people keep praising Tesla for it).
C++ is not a sane language for anyone with a passing familiarity. At least Rusts macros aren't literal text substitutions, a move towards the light.
I really subscribe to this kind of thinking, only I am team Kamal[0] instead of Docker Compose. Kamal 2 is around the corner and I think this version might even convince those that passed on Kamal 1. It's still just Docker but in a nice packaging. I'll be also updating my handbook[1] for the next version.

[0] https://kamal-deploy.org
[1] https://kamalmanual.com/handbook
How much do you know about MacOS ? Mac is more customisable than Gnome. I gather best 100 gnome extensions and still find mac more customisable as in mac everything is app including extensions. And there are gazzilions of apps in mac. And 100 extensions/apps on mac works amazing, on gnome even 25 extensions causing trouble and interfering with each other. So I throw back your at word at you. “Gnome can only dream about the way mac users can customise”.
This doesn’t happen over night though. You need to drive deep.
This is really an interesting question.

Plenty of culture war topics that currently shape the Western civilization originate in Berkeley or Boston.
They mention a 700$ AWS bill using S3 + Cloudfront (0.08 per GB) so about 700/0.08 ~9TB. In the range of what every 10$ VPS can do a month.
I tried it out on my homelab server right after the merge into the Linux kernel.

Took roughly one week for the whole raid to stop mounting because of the journal (8hdd, 2 ssd write cache, 2 nvme read cache).

The author responded on Reddit within a day, I tried his fix, (which meant compiling the Linux kernel and booting from that), but his fix didn't resolve the issue. He sadly didn't respond after that, so I wiped and switched back to a plain mdadmin raid after a few days of waiting.

I had everything important backed up, obviously (though I did lose some unimportant data), but it did remind me that bleeding edge is indeed ... Unstable

The setup process and features are fantastic however, simply being able to add a disk and flag it as read/write cache feels great.
I'm certain I'll give it another try in a few years, after it had some time in the oven.
The Unicode Consortium doesn’t try to guess or predict which characters will be useful. Instead they go by which characters are actually attested in actual things humans have written. Thus we have characters like ꙮ U+A66E CYRILLIC LETTER MULTIOCULAR O, which was a doodle used by a monk in a single manuscript in place of a normal “o” in the phrase “many‐eyed seraphim” (“many‐eyed” has an “oo” in the middle in Slavonic). Note that the monk further illuminated this character with red ink; he was having some fun with it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrillic_O_variants#/media/Fil...
What happens if you include image memes? ie, the dominant mode of chatter in male circles.

I’m not sure how you’d quantify generic “meme rate of change” though, across such disparate mediums.
I’ve only heard it from Michael Scott: “Everyone here is extremely gruntled”.
That makes me think, will we have car theft in the future where someone hacks your self driving car and it makes off on itself in the night? The next day you wake up to notice that your car has left you for someone else?
I'm used to introspecting live data with read only access. They used write access and were an accidental key stroke from deleting. Writing in prod should take permission escalation
What they're actually looking for is you to click the boxes slowly like an elderly person. Which is frustrating when you have to get through 1000 captchas.
If ShellCheck is spitting out lots of warnings, then it'd be worth changing your shell writing style to be more compliant with it. Simple things like always putting variables in quotes should prevent most of the warnings. If anything, long scripts benefit far more from using ShellCheck as you're more likely to make mistakes and are less likely to spot them.

For the false positives, just put in the appropriate comment to disable ShellCheck's error ahead of that line e.g.

# shellcheck disable=SC2034,SC2015

That stops the warning and also documents that you've used ShellCheck, seen the specific warning and know that it's not relevant to you.
Yeah sure, bussin' fr no cap.
I guess creativity and technical advancements take longer than the yearly upgrade cycle required by marketing.
Ask HN: Where can I sell SaaS source code?
Hi HN,

I developed a SaaS platform called Quickshorts a few months ago. Despite being live, it hasn’t generated any revenue yet due to time constraints and limited marketing efforts.

I’ve decided to sell the source code. Can anyone suggest the best platforms or methods for selling SaaS source code?

For reference, here’s the website: https://quickshorts.co/source-code

Thanks!
Maybe it’s just one frame per file? Also, you could probably achieve some pretty good compression with multiple frames because the frames are probably very correlated, right?
so nobody dares to invite anyone and nobody gets invited
Fundamentally and physically are two different things. A logic gate is a logic gate if it's in neurons or silicon.
Are abacus and calculators solving different things? No.

You're proving my point, things like them changing continuously are exactly what I mean when I say the brain is more efficient. Where there's a will theres a way and our brains are evidence that it can be done.
I'm not convinced machines can come up with styles like humans can. After all, a style will be judged by humans. How humans respond cannot be determined from previous styles.
Anecdotally, with reCAPTCHA I click pretty fast and generally don’t have a problem.
I bet even 99.9% of HN visitors don’t run ZFS on their laptop/desktop. Basically we all take this risk except for a few dedicated nerds.

Everything has a price and people like to have their uncorrupted files, but not at all cost.
Codecanyon.net
> Even if it's only three parts and the factory is only profitable when producing thousands a year.

If that is the case you manufacture more than enough and put them on a shelf.

> Some costs that will crop up even without investing in R&D and maintenance

Obviously. You put those costs in the contract and make the costumer pay for them.

If they want to fab 3 chips a year that is going to cost them dearly. This is not a property of the old processes. This is a property of low volumes.
Huh? Whistleblower programs exist to defend them and fail to combat the problem, one that directly punishes would be like a bounty program that actually crafts the legal threats to security researchers.
When pricing your SaaS product, several factors come into play, such as tech stack, cloud services, and integration strategy.
Has to be at least 6 figures. I got $47k on a pretty insignificant flaw with TCC and I would assume this is much more serious. The wait time is crazy though. It took almost a year to get fixed and another 6 months for the bounty to be paid. Then another year for them to even credit me for the CVE.

The fact that security researchers are completely at the mercy of the companies made me choose to do software Eng instead. Much more stable.
Not even a Myth. But a lie told and retold several times, the Zionists deemed it to be the truth and the only truth. But the Nakba has always been seen here, through the victims' tears and the colonialists' documents.
How much does CoT Reasoning typically cost for frameworks like LlamaIndex?
I'm curious to know, based on your experience in production, how much does Chain-of-Though Reasoning typically cost in terms of tokens for frameworks like LlamaIndex, LangChain, CrewAI, etc.?

I understand it depends on many different factors including the complexity of the product and the architecture of the agents involved, but I'd love to hear about your experiences in creating real-world-class application.
I respectfully disagree with what you say about SMD parts :)

SMD parts are much cheaper compared to THT in my experience. Which parts are you thinking of specifically?

I majored in CompSci but got my first job in embedded at a hardware manufacturer. IME it didn’t require many hours of practice to learn to solder e.g. 0603-parts. Around 4-5 hours of deliberate practice for me, although smaller can still be annoying.

I have slighty worse than average vision so personally need a magnifying glass or a microscope for 0402 and smaller, but I can do it and it looks pretty afterwards (says the HW techs).

I was about 5-6x slower than the HW techs at solder work and repair, so I didn’t solder something up every week/month. I can still mount a board easily with 0805s and 0603s even though it’s been a few years now.
the latter, it's just a bit ambiguously worded. In the past 10 years shipments have increased from 140 million per year to over 1 billion per year.
> if we gave loyalty to all the inventors we're benefiting from right now it would be impossible to go to war with anyone.

You say as if that is some bad thing?
I feel that on HN people tend to be a bit pedantic about topics like data integrity, and in business settings I actually agree with them.

But for residential use, risks are just different and as you point out, you have no options except to only use a desktop workstation with ECC. People like/need laptops so that’s not realistic for most people. Just run Linux/freebsd with ZFS isn’t reasonable advice to me.

What I feel most strongly about is that it’s all about circumstances, context and risk evaluation. And I see so much blanket absolutist statements that don’t think about the reality of life and people’s circumstances.
I interpret supernatural to mean religious in this context. I don't think this find will take on an X-Files direction.
Regardless of how people are feeling about Apples products, any news is better than no news so I'm sure their not to hurt by the media having mixed reviews. They operate their own way regardless of media. I'm sure if the demand for the products slowed down they may stop producing yearly incremental changes but enough people are out there upgrading from older models (I have an 11 pro and this years 16 looks very tempting to me for example). Perspective.
In case you weren't aware of TutorialD / Project:M36 already: https://github.com/agentm/project-m36

> Unlike most database management systems (DBMS), Project:M36 is opinionated software which adheres strictly to the mathematics of the relational algebra. The purpose of this adherence is to prove that software which implements mathematically-sound design principles reaps benefits in the form of code clarity, consistency, performance, and future-proofing.

> Project:M36 can be used as an in-process or remote DBMS.

> Project:M36 is written entirely in the Haskell programming language.
Could be nice if Google helped them out with servers and bandwidth, to make it work smoothly. The Internet Archive is great but often also very reminiscent of the web on 56K dial-up.
I don't feel like discounting "convenience" and "ease of use" to 0 is a reasonable argument; but we clearly disagree here.
People repairing chatgpt replies with additional prompts is reinforcement learning training data.

"Reinforcement learning", just like any term used by AI researchers, is an extremely flexible, pseudo-psychological reskin of some pretty trivial stuff.
Can anyone working in the industry verify that this isn't just rumor?
Prolog-rs: Minimal Prolog implemented in Rust
“mut XOR shared” is less about protecting you from accidentally making inconsistent mutations, it’s more about the compiler’s need for a strong invariant against action-at-a-distance so it can manage to reason correctly about code in an isolated context.
> This is remarkable to me because I would say that right now is one of the most exciting times to invest ever.

You sidestepped their points and jumped straight to investment opportunities and iPhones and VR and LLMs. He actually said tech is not used to improve people's lives and that I have observed to be true during my 22+ years in the tech area.

What he said resonates strongly with many programmers who are working on the ground: the tech is not used for absolutely anything at all that tangibly and positively changes the world, companies just want to build strong moat and keep corporate customers with binding contracts -- and there's almost zero actual technical progress, too.

(Also, "older" in this case does not do what you think it does: it means they finally got a realistic view of the situation and are no longer looking through rose-tinted glasses. This is a good thing and shouldn't be a condemning factor, and your comment kind of makes it sound like you use it that way.)

---

Let me demonstrate my point.

Here's an investment idea: smartphone app that photographs your fridge (could use LIDAR as well, why not) and catalogues everything in it, and uses magic sauce to remind you when to stock back on items X or Y. Difficult, right? Who cares! I'd buy it, hell, I'd even subscribe for such a service. Let's go. Invest in it. Stick to it until it's perfect, no matter how long it takes and no matter how much financial losses it incurs until it's done.

Will you do it?
You're right about local software comparisons, but this is different. If I'm comparing two SaaS platforms, wall clock time to achieve a similar task is a fair metric to use. The only caveat is if the service offers some kind of tiered performance pricing, like if we were comapring a task performed on an AWS EC2 instance vs Azure VM instance, but that is not the case with these LLMs.

So yes, it may be that the wall clock time is not reflective of the performance of the model, but it is reflective of the performance of the SaaS offerings.
Nah, it really takes very little for something like this to become possible. I bet you could do it with C macros, which are supposedly simple.

(I checked; I win this bet: https://github.com/kchanqvq/CSP )
ProRAW is definitely not RAW, the amount of white balance correction you can do is far more limited. It think it's closer to capturing the different HDR layers to allow the dynamic range to be tweaked more in post.
So if it's one Raw sensor frame, it will be noisy, and you won't get any of the computational photography benefits. It will end up looking like a photo from a 10 year old phone.

You will get a little compression storing multiple frames, but not much, because the photon shot noise is independent for each frame - and in lossless images, the noise (which does not compress according to information theory) often has more entropy than the ideal image (which compresses well).

Or you could store one post-processed frame, after you have combined 128 frames and done the computational photography stuff. But at that point, it isn't exactly raw data anymore.
technically, you can add the tag "woke" and hope that Gpt-4o mini's definition of woke is the same as yours. Doubtful it will give you the results you're after, but maybe to a small extent.
So it would be preferable to have your data encrypted, taken hostage unless you pay, and be down for days, instead of 6 hours of just down?
Will I remember to take my camera everywhere?
I have an MP3 file that still skips to this day, because a few frames were corrupted on disk twenty years ago.

I could probably find a new copy of it online, but that click is a good reminder about how backups aren’t just copies but have to be verified.
> This makes some sense intuitively, but it would be good to see the details worked out.

The answer seems to be Safe Haskell: https://downloads.haskell.org/ghc/latest/docs/users_guide/ex...

(Source: Safe extension mentioned in https://github.com/ed-o-saurus/PLHaskell/blob/d917f0991a455c...)

The PGm monad seems to be an instance of §6.18.1.2. Building secure systems (restricted IO Monads): https://downloads.haskell.org/ghc/latest/docs/users_guide/ex...

> There is always `unsafePerformIO`, after all...

Forbidden in untrusted code by Safe Haskell.
All non-toy programming languages support encapsulation, usually implemented with "private" or "public"/"export" keywords (well-designed languages make private the default), which means that unless the "thing" was marked as public/exported, in which case it's designed to be reused and stable and thus it's OK to depend on it, that will trigger a compiler or runtime error (in well-designed languages, a compiler error).

Obviously, in that case it's perfectly normal and acceptable to either export or make public the thing, if it is a good idea for it to be part of the module interface, or if that's not a good idea factor out the useful thing and make it a 3rd module that both the original and new modules depend one; this should come with some documentation about the interface if it's not obvious or fully specified by the types.
You can argue whether it is manipulative, but you can not deny "the intent" here. You you read up technique and then apply it, the conscious intent is 100% there. You made an active choice and went out of your way to enact it.
Arguably this is easier to do now with multimodal LLMs. I say this as someone who is skeptical of the hype around the utility of LLMs. But it can probably catalog your fridge. Was that worth boiling the oceans?
Only a matter of time IMO, and quite the short one at that. Car thieves are an adaptive bunch.
Ask HN: Resources about SaaS configuration via custom business rules?
What are some good resources about enabling customers to configure B2B SaaS software through BRMS? (Like event-condition-action rules).
What's your point? That some actual improvements to the lives of people will accelerate climate change, and thus we should not pursue it?

If so, OK, let's find another way that doesn't consume 300+ watts per GPU for thousands of GPUs. Again, let's go -- let's see some actual technical progress.

But we don't have that. We're stuck. And that's what the original article says and I support its thesis.
There is a important point to be made here; viz. The physical activity leads the mental focus/attention. In your example, flexing and relaxing the left foot big toe makes it far easier to bring the focus initially on to the activity/sensation at that point and then expanding it to overall awareness.

In the exercise i mentioned, you physically focus the eyes at a point in the blackness and the mental focus/attention follows it simultaneously.
But computer equipment uses switched power supplies which doesn't care about voltage, as long as there is enough power.
How to Bypass ReCAPTCHA While Web Scraping
The purpose of CAPTCHA is to distinguish between actual website users and automated programs by giving computers complex tasks, which you must first complete before you can access the actual content on a website.

What then can we do to address this? That's exactly what this article will cover: how to bypass captchas using programming, with an emphasis on reCAPTCHA.
Fbcode then became fbsource when it acquired the android and some data code.
I get all that. But then what "supernatural" context is?
If you go really mystic, there are infinite yogas, so not surprising that you found a different way.
The problem with that is that there are spaces between map, -, and '(1 2 3). The only way to get spaces into a name is by using vertical bars:

(defvar |do i 10| 1.100)
Considering that Rust is an ugly language to read, it shouldn't make much difference.
Ex-Semi-Professional Photographer here...Yes, I think Apple is very misleading, if not being fraudulent, saying you can shoot in "RAW" format.

"RAW files contain uncompressed and unprocessed image data, allowing photographers to capture practically every detail they see in their viewfinder. The RAW file format stores the largest amount of detail out of any raster file type, which photographers can then edit, compress, and convert into other formats. Learn more about the benefits, drawbacks, and best ways to work with a RAW image."

If Apple is giving you JPEG-XL they are compressing the file, so it is not RAW.JPEG-XL is lossless compression.
Just checked your account, if you could press the button on the top right and make it look like the power (without the slash) and then save? since it looks like it isn't enabled on your end.

And yeah still very early will be improving the UI a ton and taking into account your suggestions for the next version.

In terms of youtube, currently we just take into account the title, sometimes it is visible before hidden/blocked but we usually process within ~700ms so vast majority of the time you wouldn't see it.
"RAW compression" is an oxymoron.
Threads, Asynchronous IO, and Cancellation
"we process the tweets directly in your viewport as you would have seen them."

The primary issue with this approach is, even with the speed of gpt-4o mini, often times you're going to be displaying the "harmful" content for enough time for the brain to process it.
This is especially true when you're dealing with images and short 1 sentence content like twitter.
I think you'll want a safety mode, where nothing is displayed/or you have a css-blur on it, until it has been vetted.
Yes it is rude or uncouth to bare your teeth in Russian culture but I think that sentiment is belongs to Russia alone; I could be wrong but I don’t think throughout the world there are countries where people refrain from smiling. There is a rhetorical ambiguity in saying “it’s cultural” rather than “it’s Russian cultural”.
This is obviously survivor bias in the extreme, but Amazon started out by razoring a slice of the (relatively, at the time) huge market for paper books.
Lossless compression shouldn't matter. That's why it's called lossless.
I ordered my NAS drives on Amazon, to avoid getting the same batch (all consecutive serial numbers) I used amazon.co.uk for one half and amazon.de for the other half of them. One could also stage the orders in time.
Here in New Zealand the government passed a law that sellers like AliExpress had to pay taxes on items they shipped here directly, based on the sale price. There was a lot of debate if they would, but they all did it.

They don't collect import duty though, because we've had a free trade agreement with China since 2008.
Why would the shareholders choose to be shareholders in such an organization?
He also states doing zero research on the product space and just bought one, presumably the cheapest, easiest one to procure for the video. So while much better versions may exist, he was only showing they do and not making a statement on that make & model in particular, nor attempting to make any claims regarding all induction wok appliances.
I hope that “How Side Effects Can Improve Treatment Efficacy: A Randomized Trial" cites Stephen Maturin (~1770-??), a member of the Royal Society and sometime physician in service with the British Navy, who habitually mixed asafoetida powder into medication he compounded for seamen, upon the observation that a foul taste improved both dose-response and adherence to treatment regimem.
Wikipedia [1] seems to agree, at least.

[1]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_acetate#Food
Also a great feature when buying airplane tickets to fly to your father’s funeral. Great time to be told to smile more. F you Ryanair
They can, but you have to do it yourself instead of leaving it to the phone. For a specific foto it’s ok, but I doubt any one wants to sit after each day to process the photos one took during the day
> - Very few Linux distributions ship zfs.ko (&spl.ko); those that do, theoretically face a legal risk (any kernel contributor could sue them for breaching the GPL)

> - Linux itself explicitly treats ZFS as unsupported; loading the module taints the kernel.

So modify the ZFS source so it appears as a external GPL module... just don't tell anyone or distribute it...

I can't say much about dracut or having to build the module from source... as a Gentoo user, I do it about once a month without any issues...