skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
grapheneos supports multiple profiles. It also supports fine grained permissions for storage and contacts, AFAIK.
It's a 32bit 48Mhz CPU, clocked to 90Mhz. I used to run a major EFnet server on Linux on a 25Mhz 386 in about 1996.

If you'd given me this business card in the mid-90s, it would have been useable as my primary desktop.
Many cities could benefit from this exposition. Melbourne has a similar "WTF" moment in its grid alignment.
Nvidia CEO to nervous buyers and investors
Ever since the paper on the Vietnam of Computer Science came out, I basically grew to wonder why SQL was the only language. Good? debatable. Composable? no. spreadsheet friendly, but not json friendly.

There are what, 1000 programming languages, but only one SQL? Why?
So what's Biden's excuse for keeping him? He's had almost four years to find someone else (or more specifically to appoint board governors who will.)
You can use OnShape for free as long as you're OK with the models being publicly visible. I find that fine for learning and personal projects.

I've dabbled with OnShape, FreeCAD, and SolveSpace, and of them SolveSpace is the one I've ended up using the most. OnShape was nice, the GUI was pretty intuitive, I liked the way it worked, but I just feel weird trusting anything to a free plan on a cloud service. I don't really mind the public part, but it always felt tenuous that the plan would remain free so I didn't really feel like I could trust it long term.

FreeCAD was complicated and opaque, I never really put in the time to learn it, it just felt a bit clunky, but I keep meaning to come back to it.

SolveSpace seemed a bit mysterious at first, but just a bit of learning and I found myself pretty comfortable with it. It's not nearly as fully featured as some of the others, but it clicked well for me.

SolveSpace and FreeCAD are both FLOSS software.
The reality is likely much more nuanced. But Id expect what fields they choose to go into is the bigger factor.
Fast food workers are not minimum wage. I don't know about Taco Bell, but McDonald's has had signs up offering $18/hr in the Bay Area for a while which is like $3 more.

Well, they might be now since California passed a higher minimum wage for fast food workers.

> afford not to replace human jobs

There's practically no such thing as replacing human jobs; having a machine replace some of your /tasks/ (taking orders) lets you spend more time on the other tasks (preparing the orders) and makes you more productive.
Yes, as a one-time charge.

Though AFAIK there's no law or contract term preventing Google from starting to charge a monthly fee in the future.

And after some time — for me it was 5+ years, porting from a baby Bell land line to a postpaid T-Mobile family plan for a couple years and then to Google Voice — your number will be tarred and feathered as a "VoIP" number and rejected for identity verification by some parties until it's ported back to a paid service (again, after some time).

Even so, it's nice that Google lets me keep the number I was born with for $0/month for as long as it lasts.
Thanks for sharing!

Speaking about chrome extensions reminded me of this nice project I saw recently, in case you find useful!
That’s exactly what I was thinking while reading this.
>mechanically they have as many moving parts as an ICE so it's actually a disadvantage

I'm not sure this is true. They're talking about hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles here, not hydrogen-burning ICEs. So a fuel cell (which I believe has no moving parts at all) converts hydrogen to electricity, and from there the rest of the drivetrain is basically like an EV. In effect, you're using a tank of hydrogen gas as a crappy battery that can only discharge.

>what's the big deal with hydrogen cars?

Oil companies like them because it means that they stay relevant: you can generate hydrogen from fossil fuels pretty easily, plus this keeps them in position as necessary for fueling your car: instead of having to go to a Chevron station for gasoline, now you go to that same station for hydrogen. You don't get power from your electric utility to run your car, which makes the oil companies obsolete.
everyone acting like they can’t just reach out to a recruiter for a quarter million dollar job and need these standout things
I think the interface had improved recently.
Thanks for checking it out and for the comment! This surprised me, but you are right.

The only thing I can point to referring to this example only is that there is a lot of Javascript in the page, but the calculations are (effectively Javascript also but:) described separately, and this is still useful I'll argue -

Separation of concerns means we can easily first of all point to calculation logic, connect it to numbers where they are used, give some structure to it, build tools to generally interact with that structure (much simpler than with Javascript). calculang code is pure and has no side-effects (*supposed to), which means tools can safely re-run code and expect predictable output. I use a tool taking advantage of some of this in [1] a video exploring a calculang model for a raycasting algorithm in order to understand it and fix a thing. So, I said a lot of buzzwords but I do use these properties to experiment with different DX that is far more challenging to develop for Javascript or a programming language generally.

The calculations in How much is 13 Bn euros are almost trivial - I normally don't put in these types of hardcodes for example - and it does happen to be valid Javascript here. An example to see some technical properties of calculang itself is this (also simple) one: https://new-layout-2--finding-calculang-foc.netlify.app/shop

There are a few tabs in the top left. The first (default) tab is showing calculang code: a few formulas and a few inputs (inputs are denoted by a convention). All are implemented like functions, and there are a lot of function calls - but those brackets have nothing in them. This is because calculang tracks how inputs are used and populates brackets for you - something I call input inference (or input threading). In the second tab you'll see the calculang output.

So it looks like calculang helps you to write pure-functional calculation code in a concise way; by threading inputs through all the function calls automatically.

calculang also supports modularity and effectively lets you re-use one calculation and "overriding" some component calculation/s. In other words: calculang formulas are flexible. And this is the real motivation for calculang taking care of all that input threading: flexibility means it should be done differently in different contexts (even sensible within the same model - for example - "I want this calc with this change, I want the same calc but with this other change or no change, and I want the difference between the two").

The compiler takes care of input threading through some pretty simple graph logic - everything related to compilation is <1k lines in total. Effective modularity, flexibility, and re-use of course is useful for maintainability.

A recycling logo in the calculang.dev examples [2] indicates models which use modularity in some form.

Sorry for the long post. That really is about all the technical details I can mention - but I think separation of concerns takes it very far also - in terms of its goals (that are stated on top of calculang.dev).

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKVXRACCnqU

[2] https://calculang.dev/#examples
Zuque-3 uses a methalox engine, not unlike the first stages of Vulcan-Centaur, New Glenn and Starship.
Whatever the cost is, it's one time. I ported a number to Google Voice in 2016 and haven't paid a dime for it since then.
Homepage might be a better link. Also i think your pricing page has a big. I was looking for a demo, couldn’t find.
Last time I bought a brand new car (~8 years ago?), the dealer told me I couldn't pay more than $X amount, using credit cards, on the car, so I still needed a bank check for the rest (they wouldn't accept a personal check either).

Don't know if things have changed since.
The Hackspace folks did a series of articles and put them out as a PDF:

https://hackspace.raspberrypi.com/books/freecad

(last time I printed it, I had to add a blank to get things to duplex right)
If you didn't read anything but the title, then it's not very remarkable today.

Read any random single paragraph from the story and you can no longer say that. Especially the v2 with Ultrix.

I never wrote a coff parser & loader from scratch. Or a reimplimentation of scsi itself just to then write some virtual scsi hardware good enough to satisfy a kernel that was hard coded for exactly that hardware down to practically cycle counting and who knows what mystery quirks. (He does, he knows what mystery quirks, now.)
its a weapon
Play integrity is a basket of features with different levels. App developers can choose how much they want to enforce. So typically, you'll see banks and media companies crank that to the max. Occasionally, you'll also see random apps (like a fast food app) crank that up for no reason. The play integrity stuff is also a lot of a theatre. It doesn't necessarily ensure security, because Android in the wild is wildly insecure with EOL devices that never get an update after they are sold, but it's a way to make the suits happy. They take comfort in the fact that google says it's secure.
Notably, google is the only entity who can bless it with this badge.
Replicad is quicker to render complex things than OpenSCAD -- significantly quicker. It uses an emscripten port of OCC.

OpenSCAD integrated manifold into its codebase though you would need to use a development build to actually use it since the last release is in 2021. I heard manifold is significantly faster than CGAL.
Yep, they raised the menu prices but put generous once a day coupons in the app to do price discrimination for frequent customers.
ISO Panel – Trust in AI: How to build global confidence [video]
> Bathroom floors are not level for a good reason

Most residential bathrooms do not include a drain in the middle, at least in my part of the world.

Most residential bathroom floors here are as level as the tradesman can get them.
A question I often find myself asking with photos is "what about just re-printing it from the neg" but the point is there is an ineffable "not the original" around prints, and who makes them. Karsh probably made hundreds of prints from this neg but supervised and approved a small set (one imagines) as his AP and numbered copies. Just like Jeff Koons and Andy did, with their respective factories. If you have number #32,221 it's just different to having number #10 for many people.

That aside, if Karsh didn't document how he dodged the neg making the print, and why he chose when to stop developing it, "reproducing" the print might be very very hard.

Rembrantshuis Museum in Amsterdam sells prints from the original copper etching plates. They aren't valuable. Nor would reprints from the negative be innately valuable.

Daguerrotypes, Calotypes & Tintypes can't be reproduced AFAIK but cartes de visite and things onward from there could be? So there might be e.g. thousands of Nadar copies floating around but there really are only the D.O.Hill/Adamson prints we know, as "originals" (would like to know if thats not the case)
It's the educational version of Solidworks --- did it a while back when my son was in high school and he found it useful for doing his CAD homework.
In about 2000 we had a "bootable business card" which was a CD-ROM on which we loaded a bootable ISO image that we made with various tools that might be useful to a system administrator. The original version was made to promote Linuxcare.

Most CD-ROM drives in PCs had a small inner ring that could hold "mini CDs" with a smaller diameter than a full CD, and a truncated version of this could be a business card CD (which we did not invent; it was commercially available from CD duplicating companies). So, if you had a machine that was broken in some way or you just wanted an ephemeral Linux system, you could take our live CD out of your wallet and boot it in the machine's CD-ROM drive. (Since optical drives are no longer common, nowadays people would use a "live USB" instead of "live CD" for this.)

It's so cool that about 20 years of technological progress has taken us from "your business card can be a tiny optical storage medium containing a usable OS image" to "your business card can be a tiny computer containing a usable OS image" (giving a totally new meaning to "bootable business card").
> They run out of credits but don't have business page.

It doesn't matter, they should upgrade

> 100 credits are not enough since they manage 20+ pages

They must just buy another 100 credit package.

> They want to manage more than 1 page but unable to use 100 credits.

It doesn't matter, they should upgrade.

One common trick is to give a funny name to the 1st plan, like student, beginner, idiot^W, starter, ... So serious people don´t select it, and if someone needs to upgrade the request sounds like a compliment: "Yo are a very important person, so you must upgrade from the beginner plan to professional plan".

Plan 2 is "professional" and plan 3 is "enterprise", or something like that.

Anyway, read whatever patio11 said about that https://www.kalzumeus.com/greatest-hits/ in particular https://www.kalzumeus.com/2012/09/21/ramit-sethi-and-patrick... and also this post by Joel Spolsky https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2004/12/15/camels-and-rubber-...
It's pretty clear, no?

Are you asking me for a non-hypocritical position on the diamond market? My position is simply that natural diamonds are a luxury item. Claiming that there's suffering involved in obtaining natural diamonds and therefore you should only purchase synthetic (non-luxury) diamonds, is a view that is inconsistent with the way most people live. Otherwise, we'd all stop buying clothes, shoes, cell phones, coffee, etc. Essentially every product you use, unless you take extreme care, involves human trafficking at some point in the supply chain.
It's crazy that such an obvious problem ties the hands of regulators because people are making too much money on it. There is no defensible justification for incorporating a money siphon into an entertainment product.

This could be dealt with swiftly with a law that says that video games must have upfront pricing— either a one time payment or a fixed-cost subscription. It's fine to have loot boxes or random
rewards but how many rolls of the dice or your odds can't be affected by IRL money, and in-game items must be purchasable by either in-game currency or money, not both. Items that affect gameplay in any way must be in-game currency.

I would just ban all in-game purchases because it's still a money siphon based on social pressure but I recognize that it's a lesser evil.
Can you link it here?
You were hanging when I got here.
You mean inductance.
There is now a Python-enabled version:

https://pythonscad.org/

Using the # operator to make things transparent red helps a lot when stepping/iterating through code.
Get a bidet, they're awesome.
It’s a standard part of Data Structures & Algorithms curricula. You can find it in CLRS.
I agree with u being a neat hack, don't agree with µ being hard to type.

On US-international keyboards, it's AltGr+m
Chinese children were most likely infected by a lab leaked poliovirus in 2014
Fascinating! Berlin Airlift aside, there had to be something like this. And the comments from forces and ex-forces-kids suggest it was an intelligence goldmine if you looked out the windows in transit. Probably the DDR forces decided what they wanted counted by the perfidious western spies and sited their trucks and tanks accordingly.

Peter Hebblethwaite's book "in the vatican" discusses the railway line which runs from Italy into the papal state (singular, history moved on from the plurality of states) and can deliver goods under bond into that tax domain. I think he rode it out once, but it's a supervised crossing and you really aren't meant to ride it in. I don't think anyone spies on that run, but it is a crossing of somewhat symbolic value but for accounting and "what is a state anyway" purposes has to be acknowledged. I guess if the train breaks down inside the vatican shunting yard the guy from Italian Railways who goes in to fix it can charge out-of-state costs. (I believe its basically a shunter which pushes 4 trucks in, and pulls them out. It might not even cross over the border, although the trucks do)
Also, librecad is great for 2d work, house plans, projected profile views etc.
There is now a USD$10/month subscription for Solidworks. The software includes an astounding amount of bloat but it does work.
Camlis 2023 keynote – Security Issues in Generative AI [video]
This is why common "coil whine" heard in PC components can disappear when power-saving modes are disabled.
As of rails 6.1 you can use active records built in strict_loading to solve this problem as well
To be fair he is American and primarily marketing to an American(ized) audience. I’m personally a big fan of Americanization of foods. I’ve had dozens of “authentic” Mexican tacos and I love them - they’re fantastic things. I had a GF with an obese white trash mom who made an Americanized version of tacos which to my taste was incredible. Took the real parts and amplified certain things to the local palette. Like best tacos ever and just as authentic relatively.
Note that you probably should not add database checking in a health endpoint because it can cause a cascading failure where all your services then restart when the issue is just the database service.
Hello from 4 days in the future: https://bsky.social/about/blog/09-11-2024-video (Bluesky supports video now)
I use reactive Javascript which shows errors until a few pieces click together (best that I can understand it atm).

So it's normal to have a string of errors and then everything works, but it should work in much less than 2s. I guess that can depend on a few things!

Please let me know if waiting a bit still fails!
Unraveling the Enigma of Walter Russell's Free Energy Generators
Walter Russell's free energy generators remain a captivating subject of interest and intrigue. Despite the uncertainties surrounding their fate and government involvement, the potential of these devices to revolutionize energy production and transform our world cannot be overlooked.
Sorry I'm dumb: https://github.com/PlasmoHQ/plasmo
Sure, but then why consciously interact with it when you, especially as the admin, can just walk away?
YouTube.

I make some pretty basic things to 3d print with FreeCAD and everything I've learned came from YouTube.

Typically for me it just new
part, new spreadsheet, part design, sketch with dimensions parameterized from spreadsheet. Pad or some other boolean of solids, repeat starting at new sketch.
Market cap is not the same as net worth. Apple has around $166B in cash or cash-like reserves, so they'd run out much faster than that.
Link here for those interested: http://web.archive.org/web/20181101221927/https://docs.godot...
Is it possible to find out universal secrets through deep meditation?
I've done some FreeCAD and OpenCAD, but SolveSpace is a new one to me. Will scope it out.

FWIW, I agree on the free platform thing. I can't bring myself to put my actual projects on there.
Not from a Jedi.
This is like asking "Why does a kitchen stove have a range of settings on a dial when simply having the burner be on or off would also be able to cook food?"

And the answer is simple: Because they can be useful settings.

The food being warmed does conduct heat, but it is not an ideal conductor of heat.

And microwave ovens (just as any other kind of oven I can think of) heat from the outside. And they're supposed to make things easier and simpler.

So let's make an example: Leftover refried beans, still cold from the fridge.

I can put them in a bowl at 100% power for three minutes, and they'll probably explode and make a mess and still have parts that are cold. This "works" but it's obviously not very good. (I can mitigate some of the mess by using a cover of some kind, but that's also kind of shit.)

Or: I can put them in for a minute or two at 100%, and then stir them, and then run them for a another minute, and then stir them again, and maybe then do another minute. This "works" but it's enough work that perhaps I would be better off to skip the bowl and warm them up in a pan on the stove instead.

Or: I can set the microwave to (say) 40% duty cycle, and put them in for whatever I think is a reasonable time for the volume of beans at that duty cycle. Let's say 5 or 6 minutes.

It's slower, which prevents layers from getting stupid-hot and explodey, and gives the beans more time to reach thermal equilibrium. It's completely hands-off once the buttons are pushed. I'll probably still give them a stir before serving, but they'll be fine.

(I'm a fan of simplicity, but I'm not a fan of lack of control like OP's microwave offers as a primary selling point.

The microwave oven that we had when I was growing up was simple and functional: It had mechanical timer switch with a mechanical bell to set the cook time and announce the end of a run, which is about as simple as it can get while retaining any aspect of automation. It also had an analog dial with which the duty cycle could be continuously set, from somewhere between ~5% to 100%, and this duty cycle could even be changed while the machine was running. No computers, and nothing particularly electronic at all. Just a timer and [what was probably] a heated bimetallic switch (just like a common, cheap electric range uses).)
I like JokoEngineering's tutorial videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Odr5viqPwkc

My first tip for most people would be to start with the Part Design workbench, although if you're coming from OpenSCAD, you might prefer the Part workbench. FreeCAD has many different workbenches for handling various use cases, such as architectural models, surface trimeshes, 2D machine shop drawings, and so on. The various workbenches do mostly work together well, but for a beginner it's intimidating to have so many options.

"Part Design" is probably the most familiar approach for people coming from high-end CAD programs like SolidWorks; it uses the 2D sketch + extrude workflow. The similarly-named Part workbench is for people who prefer to think in terms of boolean operations on solids, which is generally the OpenSCAD way.
Is this the difference between learning and doing? You were looking at how long it would take to learn all the foundational technologies, once that was done, she could start to code the game. Where she took the on-the-job-training approach. Work on the project, run into a problem, learn enough to solve said problem. Repeat until done.

I’m usually the learn before I start type as well, though I find it doesn’t really work for me in practice. It ends up becoming a form of procrastination.
The codebase heavily uses PyTorch XLA libraries (torch_xla.*), which are specific to TPU. Key TPU-specific elements include XLA device initialization, SPMD execution mode, TPU-specific data loading, and mesh-based model partitioning.

[0] https://github.com/felafax/felafax/blob/main/llama3_pytorch_...

[1] https://pytorch.org/xla/master/
BiSS: High speed open-source digital interface for IoT sensors and actuators
Just a quick thought about the name. Microsoft/GitHub's coding assistant is Copilot. If your project gets traction, I'm certain you will receive a cease and desist letter for using the name Design CoPilot.
NASA okays mission to search for life on Jupiter's moon Europa
I didn't see a link to the code, but there's a GitHub for it. https://github.com/Ucas-HaoranWei/GOT-OCR2.0

(Edit: I found it, it was at the top of the paper, the Arxiv html view formatted it weird on mobile)