skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
i think the hope is by the next presidential election no one will trust video anymore anyway so the new normal wont be as chaotic as if the dropped in the middle of an already contentious election.

as for not building it at all its a obvious next step in generative ai models that if they don't make it someone else will anyway.
Yes, plenty of good examples.

Spotify and Netflix changed the way people think about intellectual property and how content is accessed.

Tinder changed the way people thought about meeting partners.
Ask HN: The Cost of Building an AI Workflow with Open-Source Tools for a Startup
Hi everyone,

I'm planning to build an AI workflow using open-source tools like models, vector databases, and frameworks (e.g., crewAI, langchain, llamaindex) without doing any training or fine-tuning. Can anyone share the average computational cost to go from an idea to a finished product using cloud-based services? I'm specifically interested in the average total cost for developing "multi-agent AI workflow using chain-of-thought".

Thanks.
To the person who had a comment removed:

The reason we don't talk like that is because it turned out to encourage wholesale murder. It's not that you're "wrong", it's that you're not singling out the responsible individuals when you could just do that. It comes across as intentionally painting with too broad a brush.
I have had something like this and a bunch of other parasomnias for a while, one of which I haven't really come across in any literature and doctors seem to have no idea what I'm talking about, so I'll try to explain.

I can't do it 100% of the time, but I can enter a dream/unconscious state whilst being fully awake. Here's how it goes:

- first stage you start seeing light swirling shapes that can take various colors, believe this is called hypnogogic hallucinations, but at this point you won't make any sense or shape of them

- second stage these swirling shapes start to take form into the shapes of images, sometimes flashing between different ones

- third stage directly after this is the "exploding head" part that doesn't happen 100% of the time but right in between that hypnogogic boundary I get an incredibly loud buzzing sound in my head, accompanied by a deep sense of terror - almost like you get from sleep paralysis.

- fourth stage, once you get past that, you enter a light "dream" state where you start to feel like you can move your arms and legs and walk around, even if you don't see anything - it's a very weird sensation because you can still "feel" your physical body lying in the bed at this time. I believe this is when sleep paralysis is happening.

- fifth stage I am in a dream state and fully lucid. I can maintain that state for a while before either losing the dream and waking up or falling deeper into unconsciousness. What's odd is in this state I am almost always in a dream-representation of my house. 99.999% of the time. Initially my doctors thought this was when I was sleep walking, but cameras ruled this out.

I have a bunch of other parasomnias like sleep walking/talking and bed wetting stuff when I was younger. It's all related somehow, but no one really knows what's going on that I've talked to so far. It's kind of cool but can occasionally lead to crappy stuff like insomnia or poor quality sleep, or when I injure myself sleep walking. The only thing that's ever come up in a sleep study (which I struggle to take because in those settings I can't fall asleep normally) is that I enter REM sleep very quickly, almost like a narcoleptic, but that was never the formal diagnosis. Another thing that's happened in more recent years, ever since I experienced DMT, that I will occasionally have dreams where my sense of time literally feels like decades have passed. It'll always be super mundane stuff too, and when I wake up it's a really disturbing feeling.
Off topic - has anyone found cheaper sets of sifts than the kruve. The grind us way more important than the machine.
I can write these things, and I assume it will be necessary for anything someone pays for, but I'm mainly just asking a question so I can learn about how people would monetize these things (if it's even possible to) nowadays.
The cap is neat but requires two hands to apply (and locate) vs a stand. Makes a big difference at times.

I’m also worried about burning myself if I’m not paying attention when putting the cap on 20 or 30 times in succession.
I’m pretty sure an assassination marketplace would not fly under the same legal pretense. The platform won’t do the killing, right?

If hotel or taxi lobby was more powerful or caught the threat early on AirBnB and Uber would have been destroyed.
Man, that's the kindergaten view of international relations and war. Really, that's not how the real world works and things have a lot more layers than this cheap naivety.

At the bare minimum, if the US can bomb and invade countries thousands of kilometers away from its borders due to their alleged security interests we should take into account the probability that Russia as a nation-state follows a similar logic when dealing with a country that borders them.

It is not like the US is some kind of exceptional entity that have some special rights to act in certain ways that are verboten for other countries.
Gnosticism has the pattern that there is a demiurge that created this world as a prison. This is the capitalist economy. Gnosticism says that those initiated into secret knowledge will become of aware of the real nature of the world and seek to wake everyone else up. This is the idea of the revolution fixing all problems and bringing about the great communist utopia by transferring all capital ownership to the state. Marx doesn't say a whole lot about how the Utopia would actually operate, those were details Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky were figuring out in Vienna.

Hermeticism, specifically the emerald tablet, says that we can make things become believable by just willing them with our minds. Those who believe the things should be treated preferentially, and those who don't should be persecuted because they stand in the way of the implementation of those things. This applies to Marx's beliefs in the labor theory of value among other totally non-empirically backed beliefs being treated as ideological indisputable truth.
> Nobody expects to live longer and have dementia

I think we can generalise that statement to "nobody expects to have dementia". Until you get it :/

There are people taking lots of vitamins, but with apologies to any vitamin-takers, that hypothesis seems to have been thoroughly debunked.

For healthy adults, taking multivitamins daily is not associated with a lower risk of death
https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/healthy-adults...
I think we're completely talking past each other. OP wrote:

> Reviewers should always see only the changes since their last review, no matter how many crazy git operations happen behind the scenes.

I merely wanted to know how they achieve that with git.
I miss forums too, and I blame the "mobile revolution" for their demise.

Forums are ideal for long-form discussion in text-format. But they don't really work well on mobile devices where typing is cumbersome and reading a lot of text to catch up on a thread isn't all that enjoyable.

And you remember when forums were trying to be mobile friendly by introducing things like infinite scroll? It just didn't work. Meanwhile "the masses" were flocking to sites like Twitter where content was delivered in short bites and they could doom scroll until they got bored.

Forums still exist they are just niche now and it's harder to attract a user-base when so many people prefer to use social media for their "discussions" because that is better suited to small talk on a smart phone.
These unicorns examples are easy to use and understand, it’s hard to imagine in practice where most apps won’t have the same impact but still have similar qualities, he should have found a few of those examples
UPS trucks are custom designed for UPS; they used to have a nice documentary about it. New Amazon trucks around where I live are clearly custom (and also not very pretty, if you ask me).
Flair Espresso has a similar thing and it looks like they have European distributors.

https://flairespresso.com/distributors/

I have the Original and have had it since it was the only thing they made. It's picky but if you get it all dialed right it makes great espresso.
We have destroyed natural selection in humans a long time ago when by creating effective healthcare, so don't worry about it.

There are many companies making different versions of this drug, I don't see why you think its some kind of conspiracy intended to control the masses, literally if the benefit is greater than the costs what is your issue with it?
It is always a little refreshing to hear of a successful government project. Congratulations.

I was skeptical of Louis Dejoy's appointment to the USPS but maybe it will turn out OK.
Using Proxies in Web Scraping
Yes, if "efficiency" is your top concern, but I'd much prefer working with an actual person than just a computer. I mean, God forbid I'm only useful for what I can produce, and disposable when I reach my expiration date. I would like to see a twilight zone rendition of an AI dystopia where all the slow, ignorant and bothersome humans are replaced by lifeless AI
You already lost if your mental model to create something is based on a VC company's marketing outreach or blogger dude's publicity outreach attempt.
Last mile delivery companies don't handle the volume of non-package traffic that the USPS does. At that scale, tailoring can really pay off in productivity.
Sorry to hear that, and good luck. Additionally I apologize for the undue cynicism, but as a flashlight enthusiast I've been frustrated with this problem for years and years. The form factor of a battery charger and USB powerbrick/supply would be so nice! It's massively annoying to me that I own many 18650s and still need to buy and replace power banks.

Worse, it seems like the manufacturers best suited to make the product I desire(anker and nitecore) are directly incentivized by obsolescence to not ever make it. The best thing I've found so far is the Nitecore LC10, but it was discontinued. :(

I sort of suspected that it might be the case of safety bodies getting in the way. I really hope you make progress with UL. I'm rooting for you. There should be a way of overcoming this problem.
seriously - what a waste of money. Guaranteed the maintenance is rife with corrupt arrangements. Also guaranteed that almost any American car manufacturer (Rivian, Tesla, Ford, etc.) would have done a far better job for far less. Did they even pretend to have a fair bidding system? Oshkosh Defense? Seriously?! What a joke.
As an Indian, it is extremely naive and childish to dismiss any consideration of the British rule as a "slap in the face". The British introduced electricity, railways, capitalism and a thousand other things we take for granted behind those saffron-tinted glasses.

Hell, the British Raj was what unified India into a single national identity. It was more fractured than the European continent otherwise.
There's a bit more info on our blog:

https://docs.onetimesecret.com/blog/2024-09-12-ddos-day-4

https://docs.onetimesecret.com/blog/2024-09-09-denial-of-ser...
Part of the reason for America's variance in trial decisions is related to the jury system, which imo is highly flawed. You're essentially putting the lives of the innocent and the guilty in the hands of a set of people who barely have any training in unbiased analysis. And more importantly, with the jury system, you do not have a way of establishing precedence.

As proof of this, the most successful legal system in the US, the Delaware Chancery Court, is a non-jury trial court.

> Why retain it as a potential punishment if the burden of proof to obtain it is impossible?

India has the death penalty, but they use it for the most egregious of crimes (brutal rape-murders like the one in 2012, terrorists, gangland bosses, etc.).
Is the OP one a direct heat iron?
> They believe that they alone are capable of safely engaging with the world of ideas to determine what is true, and thus feel strongly that information and speech ought to be censored to prevent the rabble from engaging in wrongthink.

This is a particularly ungenerous take. The AI companies don't have to believe that they (or even a small segment of society) alone can be trusted before it makes sense to censor knowledge. These companies build products that serve billions of people. Once you operate at that level of scale, you will reach all segments of society, including the geniuses, idiots, well-meaning and malevolents. The question is how do you responsibly deploy something that can be used for harm by (the small number of) terrible people.
So if someone who can't drive, finds a car with the keys in it, and starts driving it, and causes an accident, who do you blame?

And do you have any reason at all to believe the backend people didn't know? They wrote a fair amount of code and infrastructure, so they cannot have been blank slates.
I think that's just more that Urbit isn't a good (or at least mature) product.
You may still be misinterpreting it (or, more likely, I am misinterpreting you!). The "faster horse" is exactly what the customer wants. It it is what you need to provide. The trouble is that people don't have the words to properly describe what they want (It doesn't yet exist. It cannot be fully described using existing language!), so you cannot take what they say literally. You have to really dig in and truly understand them and what they are trying to say.
Reasoning tokens are indeed billed as output tokens.

> While reasoning tokens are not visible via the API, they still occupy space in the model's context window and are billed as output tokens.

From here: https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/reasoning
The CoT is billed as output tokens. Mentioned in the docs where it talks about reasoning
Big bumper in the front.
> possible for a language to raise the ceiling of software quality

Cargo is widely recognized as low quality. The thesis fails within it's own standard packaging. It's possible for a language to be used by _more people_ and thus raise the quality _in aggregate_ of produced software but the language itself has no bearing on quality in any objective measure.

> to benefit from a raised ceiling

You're explicitly putting the cart before the horse here. The more reasonable assertion is that it takes good people to get good results regardless of the quality of the tool. Acolytes are uncomfortable saying this because it also destroys the negative case, which is, it would be impossible to write quality software in a previous generation language.

> TigerBeetle[0] is an example

Of a protocol and a particular implementation of that protocol. It has client libraries in multiple languages. This has no bearing on this point.
Because they don't deliver to mailboxes on the curb opposite the driver in a LHD vehicle?
I think some older instance types are still on xen, later types run kvm (code named nitro.. perhaps?). I can’t remember the exact type but last year we ran into some weird issues related to some kernel regression that only affected some instances in our fleet, turns out they where all the same type and apparently ran on xen according to aws support
Careers have failed to be 30 years long for a lot longer than 30 years now. That's one of the reasons that 4-year colleges have drastically lost their ROI, the other blade of those scissors being the stupendously rising tuition. AI is nothing but one more layer in the constantly growing substrate of computing technology a coder has to learn how to integrate into their toolbelts. Just like the layers that came before it: mobile, virtualization, networking, etc.
maybe they will enable to show CoT for a limited uses, like 5 prompts a day for Premium users, or for Enterprise users with agreement not to steal CoT or something like that.

if OpenAI sees this - please allow users to see CoT for a few prompts per day, or add it to Azure OpenAI for Enterprise customers with legal clauses not to steal CoT
Does anyone know where one might go to buy the retired vehicles?
Azure uses hyper-v, unless things have changed massively, the linux they run for infra and customers is in hyper-v.
As soon as software development can be fully performed by AIs, it won't take long before all other jobs that can be performed in front of a computer follow, and after that it probably won't take long for practically the entire rest.

This release has shifted my personal prediction of when this is going to happen further into the future, because OpenAI made a big deal hyping it up and it's nothing - preferred by humans over GPT-4o only a little more than half the time.
The screenshot [1] is not readable for me. Chrome, Android. It's so blurry that I cant recognize a single character. How do other people read it? The resolution is 84x800.
Clearly both are equally important, 100% necessary. This doesn't account for rarity, nor does it account for wages, agreeability, smell or any of the other things it isn't trying to measure. You'll need a different metric for that and if you want to take both into account you should.
Do note that profiles in a dating app are in principle accessible to everyone. You open the app, profiles appear. There's no ACL or anything like that.

Messages and private pictures is another matter.
Based upon the sales of Nespresso machines and pods a lot of people seem to disagree with you regarding the taste.
That's fine. You also miss all papers not on arxiv. You miss published versions of even the papers on Arxiv (which are often improved versions), and you miss any benefit peer review has on those papers.

I use arxiv nearly every day, and also a few places that get things not on arxiv because the majority of papers are simply not there. Arxiv is paid for by universities paying subscriptions, locked in for five years at a time. It's also funded by Simons Foundation (which may not pay forever) and Cornell and many individual donors. Affiliate groups like professional societies and govts pay huge sums to keep it running. Many companies pay 10's of thousands annually to be members.

Piggybacking on their money while taking affront at a bigger, more comprehensive service, because they dare post an ad, seems somewhat short sighted, but to each his own.

ResearchGate is the largest academic social network, so many use it for that reason. Here's an (2014) Nature article on researcher usage of various sites that may surprise you https://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-...

Since a significant number of job postings for researchers as well and communication and networking opportunities are widely used on Research Gate, none of which is present on Arxiv, you are simply missing likely useful contacts and tools for your career. And I write this as a researcher for several decades, long before any of these were live.

As I said, enough people find value at research gate that millions do pay.
I can't either. And yet I know many of them personally. I realized there are hundreds if not thousands of grieving innocent parents locked up for years or decades because of this flawed theory.

See also this book (https://jessicahenryjustice.com/smoke-but-no-fire-convicting...).
>If Nestlé hadn't crippled their machines on purpose

Nestle invented an entirely new way to brew coffee AGAIN just to extra lock down their pod system from independent competition.

The built all this wankery about spinning the pods at like 30k rpm to "force the water through the coffee like an espresso machine" but it _doesn't_. As Mr Hoffman discussed, the foam it creates is just aerated coffee, which is substantially different than the foam you get from actually putting water through coffee at high pressure. All this to get a patent on a physical process so that competitors cannot drive the price of their pods down.

And the coffee still tastes like shit. And the machine takes a long time. And it makes a stupid and annoying noise. The system is demonstrably worse than any other pod based system because it was more important to Nestle that they get their pod profit margins than you get acceptable coffee.

Like seriously this should be a crime, not a civil infraction, a crime to artificially lock out competition like this.
just because something can generate an output for you, does not make a need for discernment and application obsolete.

like another commenter, i do not have a lot of faith, that people who do not have at minimum: fundamental fluency in programming (even with a dash of general software architecture and practices).

there is no "push button generate and glueing components together in a way that can survive at scale and be maintainable" without knowing what the output means, and implies with respect to integration(s).

however, those with the fluency, domain, and experience, will thrive, and continue thriving.
This happens to me. Started in my twenties and I was convinced I had a brain tumor. I'll be almost entirely asleep, then I get jerked by a weird electric buzz sound, like the buzz of a transformer, and it feels like my body from the shoulders up is zapped with electricity, then I get terribly anxious. And then I don't get to sleep that night more often than not because of the anxiety.
This is not going to replace you. This isn't AGI.
Dalrymple has a uniquely addictive style of writing that very few history writers do. I can't recall any other nonfiction book becoming such a page-turner for me as his "Anarchy" did. Terrific writer.
Where are your servers hosted?
Maybe you are wrong if you don’t know the answer?
To some extent I agree, but until now all of the big jumps (GPT2 -> GPT3 -> GPT4) have meant significant improvements across all tasks. This does not seem to be the case here, this model seems to be vastly stronger on certain tasks but not much of an improvement on other tasks. Maybe we will have to wait for GPT5 for that :)
I assume the poster meant how much progress the models have made. Roughly late high school capability to late college-ish. Project forward five years.
Yea :(
Yeahhhhh plus did any of those really change “how people think”? I was expecting some epistemology content, not just “if you’re Uber-successful (heh) you can create a new sub market”. Like,

For Uber, people wanted an easier way to get around, but, at the same time, people’s thinking shifted away from “why would I want to get into a strangers car?”

That’s literally describing taxis. By what metric would taxi drivers not be strangers?

AirBnb shifted thinking away from “why would I let strangers into my house?”.

Couch surfing is a long-running practice that Airbnb monetized. Plus, y’know, BnBs exist.

Reddit changed the way people interacted online and how online content was aggregated, people often append “reddit” to their google results to get higher quality content.

This isn’t really saying anything in the first place. Forums are older than reddit, to say the least, and the “Reddit + Google” effect is an overblown cliche at this point IMHO.

DoorDash changed the way people think about takeout and how restaurants monetize their food.

I’d maaaaybe give DD and GH “popularized”, maybe. But “changed how people think about takeout” seems unsupported.

OpenAI completely shifted how people think about intelligence and the effects of AI on society.

They invented the first usable chatbot. That’s not “changing how people think” in any intentional way, that’s just first-mover advantage. The first car, the first passenger plane, and the first vaccine had similar effects, not because of any business strategy but just because those technologies turned out the useful.
Nuts that when the coup was mounted the military completely gutted the Cybersyn facility out of sheer ignorance about what was being done inside.
Survival instinct is deeply hard wired into all animals, including humans. It's natural to want to continue living.

Anti-aging is picking up now because there's a growing belief that significantly extending the healthy human lifespan is within scientific/technological reach.