skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> [...] for parasocial relationships. Because clearly it’s not about the content per see which is a dim a dozen and available for free in trove.

I think you're making assumptions about people's motivations that aren't consistent with evidence.

Pornhub and similar sites are full of content that is a dime a dozen and available for free and does not suggest any kind of "parasocial" relationship with the viewer. It's just two or more people fucking. And it's the same as it was ten years ago. And yet... More of that content keeps being made. Porn production companies exist. Pornstars making money for fucking on camera exist. Clearly there are people willing to pay for new porn that will just end up on free-to-view sites anyway.

Your mental model of "it's all about the parasocial relationship" doesn't explain these facts. Thus your mental model can't be the whole truth. I suspect it's at most a fairly small part of the truth.
It's unfortunate but not surprising given that the job market is awful and worthwhile recruiting tends to be localized to top tier unis...
You can't hold a patent to a cartoon drawing of a mouse (that you're implying is the character Mickey Mouse)

You can hold a design patent for the look of a tangible object - e.g. the rounded corners of an iPhone. You can also hold a design patent for particularly novel typefaces (fonts), the layout of a screen (e.g. like Norton Commander's twin directory listings on the left and right) and for computer icons, but that only covers them when they're displayed on screen.

So you could get a patent for the stylised depiction of a mouse as an icon, but only in that context.

If you wanted to flex ownership of a fictional character design, you get that by copyright, not patent. And the copyright law on derivative works is what protects that fiction character design from being copied or evolved by others. But it can't stop them parodying your design in order to ridicule it (specifically), so you don't have absolute control over it.

This is why I don't like the use of the term "IP" or "intellecual property", as it completely muddies the waters as to what your actual rights are, and what limitations of "ownership" there are.
Yes, “Everyone” was the default for years https://readwrite.com/facebook_pushes_people_to_go_public/
He's not wrong- the average bookcel doesn't have the same sort of oral recall that storytellers of past had. Not that it's a bad thing.
I prefer reading some book. Maybe the LLM was trained on some piece of knowledge not available on the net, but I much prefer the reliability and consistency of a book.
that's an annoying website. close
It's better at planning a system design and asking the right questions (e.g. "Potential problems and challenges") then a 2-3 year experienced developer I would say. Will be very useful for scientific and biotech companies with less strengths in programming, but more in the science of their domain.
It's trivial to come up with prompts that 4o fails. If it's hard to come up with prompts that 1o succeeds on but 4o fails, that implies the delta is not that great.
Or regular embarrassment, or I don't want to "get in" to onlyfans, just this one time then I'll delete.
Biden-Harris Administration Cracking Down on De Minimis Shipments
That's what going to turn our society upside down before we realise what we're dealing with. Sex is a lot like doing drugs that as a side effect make you release your life energy. The same energy that creates new life in the right circumstances. In the nature, obtaining sex is difficult, which limits the amount of this sex drug we can consume. AI removes this "obstacle" from our way and opens the gates to such dungeons of our mind that we thought never existed. The effect at the society level will be a giant short-circuit when the electric energy that makes our bodies alive will rush down and burn the wires.
M is 1,000 in Roman numerals. MM is short for M*M, so 1,000 * 1,000 = 1,000,000 or MM.

The M lives on in languages like Spanish where the word mil means one thousand.
I'm going to need that in smoot-manhattans per cubit.
The highest priority is probably making real debugging tools. Right now, the only decent debugging tool is ghc-debug to connect to a live process, and doing anything over that connection is slow, slow, slow. ghc-debug was the only thing which was able to resolve a long standing thunk leak in one of my systems, and I know that unexplained thunk leak caused a previous startup I was at to throw away their Haskell code and rewrite it in Rust. In my case, it found the single place where I had said `Just $` instead of `Just $!` which I had missed the three times I had inspected the ~15k line program. ghc-debug still feels like a pre-alpha though, go compare it to VisualVM for what other languages have.

Also, I have found very little use for the various runtime flags like `+RTS -p`. These flags aren't serious debugging tools; I couldn't find any way to even trigger them internally at runtime around a small section, which becomes a problem when it takes 10 minutes to load data from disk when the profiler is on.

The debugging situation with Haskell is really, really bad and it's enough that I try to steer people away from starting new projects with the language.
Broadly speaking, modern espresso groupheads for home use you want to focus on one thing: responsiveness. You want it to react to temperature provided, not resist changes to temperature, and be able to be controlled. E61 groupheads are typically coupled directly to the boiler of the machine via thermosiphon, so they heat up as the machine heats up. This also means that heating up the giant chunk of mass takes ages. Terrible for home use.

The E61 grouphead is meant for commercial usage. It's heavy, tons of thermal mass, and has a tendency to overheat if it isn't flushed regularly (or, in the case of a commercial setting, just used... which typically isn't a problem in a commercial setting).

For most home usages of E61 machines you need to perform "temperature surfing" to get a great shot from an E61. More modern groupheads don't have such a large thermal mass and tend to be somewhat isolated from the boiler or thermoblock, so you can just heat them directly from a previously pulled shot and be just fine.

Again, not to say you can't make good espresso from them. I think there's also some E61 constructions and mitigate some of these issues, but they're not standard in the industry.
Awesome! I did mot know about this. Thanks.
Trying to translate your last sentence to English gives "Mauldite in itself very all the ligny". Trying to autocorrect it gives "Maudit soit toute la ligne" which apparently means "Damn the whole line". So... am I close? :D
The question become are post with a limited reach (friends) the public sphere.
Exactly what I was going to say. Obama is a centrist establishment politician, whereas MLK was an activist which, by definition, meant that he was operating at the then extremes of the political landscape. It would be insulting to many for Obama to compare himself to the great MLK.
And from the other perspective, Obama is a POTUS first and a politician second and he clearly does not like his whole persona being "the black guy".
Related: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41049365
Does it? I deleted my Facebook back in 2016 or so when it got so bad. Before that, I used extensions to make it show posts from friends in chronological order instead of whatever it was optimizing for by default (engagement/controversy, I think?)

It's just such a toxic, manipulated environment... I don't use social media anymore, just text some friends, and am much happier.
> An attacker can send malicious calendar invites to the victim that include file attachments...Before fixes were done, I was able to send malicious calendar invitations to any Apple iCloud user and steal their iCloud Photos without any user interaction.

What's the scope of this? Can anyone on macOS anywhere really just send random invites to anyone else who uses icloud? Who would even want that?
Top 20 students in chemical engineering went into tech and finance.... two professions that at the first sight have nothing in common with chemical engineering... Tech and finance must really be looking for a lot of employees....
>and yet they're never prepared

Of course not, how could we be prepared unless we continuously invest? In what other sphere does life continue to flourish in the face of evolving threats without continuous co-evolution?

As an American I am not an at all concerned about the total amount spent. I am highly concerned that it gets spent effectively.

> to the detriment of their health and education

The US is starting to realize that Europe has neglected its own defense in favor of social projects, while relying on US taxpayer defense spending.

>It's a sad state of affairs.

Agreed.
Thank you for your response! That is valuable, I will note that down. Ah this might be it. I was doing auth and imported react too (following a tutorial on firebase + react in extensions) about 4 years ago (~2020 winter). How do you manage to keep track of credits or make money if your extensions don't have auth then, though? Send users to results pages which are on your site?
CCSF's cybersecurity courses are renowned, from what I recall.
My first few attempts at getting it to work with an existing codebase have not been impressive. Perhaps 1o is best suited to difficult problems that can be stated in only a few sentences.
A Digital Archive Features Audio Cassette Tape Designs
Blood-Loving Birds of the Galápagos
This is definitely on my radar, and not just technical skills which have a diminishing return at some point. Mainly understanding business considerations (product, market, timelines, costs, etc.) to be a person deciders can bounce ideas off of when still considering and defining features.

I like the personal five-year plan idea. It will help setting clear expectations and action plans. Thank you!
I don't think you can make a blanket statement like this - the defaults and privacy policy for FB have changed a lot in 16 years, multiple times. It might be the case today, but this is 16 years of data.
Everyone has their favourites, but have you not seen Katamari Damacy ?
Discrimination against people making the wrong choices is natural. Discriination against people repenting for the wrong choices is wrong
This reminds me (in the best way possible) of the Eve-lang demos of debugging a program by simply asking "why is <the UI element> not here?" Fantastic work!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWAMr72VaaU&t=164s and https://witheve.com/
Genetic Evidence Overrules Ecocide Theory of Easter Island Once and for All
it's true, I only have to reply to one stupid post and I'm flooded by similar nonsense. now I've taken to closing it if it shows me anything other than a nice house or a cat. i definitely see less dumb.
You don’t consider HN social media?
Why would bailing out Boeing be a good idea?
Considering the standard datasets contain 4chan posts it’s probably a marginal improvement.
That's exactly how I feel. I didn't realize how much of a productivity-stopper class naming was until I stopped doing it. It's amazing how much faster you move.
I should be clear, I see the linkage.

The union-busters from MD are a cause of Boeing's woes, and it would be difficult to maintain a high-discipline, high-quality culture in a right-to-work plant without external oversight. The plausible deniability of production mandates with records falsification make zero-tenure employment toxic to a safety-critical program.
Not to mention the time it takes. So not only are you losing money, losing time, and it's emotionally taxing, but you often aren't even making money during that time.
I don't agree because it creates this dilemma for creators: you need to put your work out there to get traction, but if you put your work out there and anything public is fair game, then it will be sampled by a computer and instantly recreated at scale. This might even happen without the operator knowing whose work is being ripped off.

Commercial art producers have always ripped off minor artists. They would do it by keeping it very similar to the original but just different enough to avoid being sued. Despite this, I personally know two artists who have sued major companies who ripped off their work for ads, and both won million-plus settlements. Why would we embrace this now that a computer can do it and there's a level of deniability? I don't understand how this benefits anyone.
other folks have responded about the state of Uber’s Autonomous driving program, so I just wanted to weigh in about the other question here.

GCP was not a strong competitor (in our eyes) when the on-prem decision was being made in the 2011-2013 timeframe, which was also before there was even an Autonomous program. The reason early infra was on-prem largely boiled down to a general distrust for the cloud from the Boss, who in my recollection had had some bad experiences with other portfolio companies suffering major downtime due to AWS outages.

Uber’s relationship with Google was great until that little legal matter. They were huge and very helpful investors in Uber.
> That should require a huge introspection and if needed, shut down unsafe lines of business.

Which line of business would that be? Maybe the one involving human drivers that leads to ~75 deaths per year [1]? Though that's still a lower-than-average death rate compared to the general population (so shutting it down without a replacement could cause even more deaths).

You could argue that Uber has a moral imperative to replace its human drivers with automation as soon as possible.

[1] https://uber.app.box.com/s/lea3xzb70bp2wxe3k3dgk2ghcyr687x3?...
sharing != asking
No, just trying to design my own properties. The best luck I have had is SketchUp. Now I have a huge design locked up in their expensive webby software.
As the infamous saying goes, "If you aren't paying for the product, you are the product"
Actually if you want to train a model that can recognize bad things you want to have those bad things in the language model training data, otherwise it won’t see the characteristics of those things and it will later struggle to recognize them in later training stages.
You don’t care about saving jobs but you think we should be guaranteed jobs? How do you imagine guaranteed jobs work?
It's the first time they've publicly acknowledged what specifically was used in the training set for their LLMs. It's NOT the first time they've said that that data could be used for research. The presumption was that they had used the data for their LLMs.

Maybe it is surprising to some that they this particular research used that data, but it really shouldn't be to anyone aware of how LLM development is done.
The Death of Music Production Plugins [video]
I suggest you come over to the UK.

I know several guys with postgraduate STEM degrees and 10 years of development experience who can’t even get interviews.

It’s very bad here.
This could be a series.

t-shirt vs sweater
car vs truck
cat vs dog
For what? For opening your legs and getting paid for it? Without criminals and sleezy execs as clients prostitution would cease to exist. The edge cases mentioned before are tiny
New evidence of RT's key role in Russian intelligence operations globally
Is OpenAI's o1 architecture hidden in plain sight?
That's purely a research organization, with no existing regulatory role.
I don't believe for a moment that they haven't used the data of countless children. Especially early on when kids just had to click an "I'm over 18" button or enter a fake birthday to get accounts and facebook, like everyone else, just looked the other way.
I’m a fan of community college, but I’m not surprised that no companies reached out. It is rough to try and jump into an entry-level position after only two years of studying programming. If you want to be a programmer, the way community college fits into that plan is as the first half of a four-year program. You take intro programming classes in community college, transfer to a four-year college, and then take your 300-level and 400-level algorithms / compilers / operating systems / databases classes. You end up with significantly less student debt and the same credentials, although this is not without its drawbacks (mainly, you may transfer but end up needing three years of study instead of two; you have to really be on top of shit w.r.t. bureaucracy to de-risk this one).
Your moral compass is truly fucked.
One makes a mess of their own life and contributes to making a mess of many other lives. The other cleans up messes.
I mean, this sounds legit, but it also sounds like any other job. Have you worked construction? You will have an absurd amount of stuff to get through, with no help if the weather decides not to cooperate. Bus driver? Good luck if traffic is bad. Teacher? Hope the kids are cooperative today. Working in a tech company when your stack is down?

That is, you are correct that it is higher stress than a healthy software job. It doesn't take a lot of searching to see that "grind" for game devs is absurd, though. And I'm sure you can find stories of toxic teams in any big company.

That is all to say, a ton of that pressure being "high stress" is specifically from people buckling under the pressure. I think it is fair to say that working an active event at the likes of Amazon can be as pressured as any food service work. Doesn't mean it has to be high stress.
With rate cuts on the horizon I expect this to turn around over the next year.
I can't wait for the ooohhs and aaahhs when people start "going hybrid."
Please don't cross into personal attack or flamewar. Your post here is a noticeable step in those directions, and we're trying for the opposite on this site. (I'm not saying that the parent comments were perfect either but degrees matter.)

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Nuclear war is unlikely to hit anywhere beans are actually produced. Nobody out there with nukes is like "we gotta wipe out those fuckers in Brazil, Vietnam, Colombia, and Indonesia!"
I'm not sure if you're reading more into what I said than I intended, but I'm not convinced by this argument. You might have missed that this course was on security in general, not cryptography; not everything in the course was cryptographic related.

That said, I'd argue that for the vast majority of software engineers the type of stuff they're dealing with can be dealt with without needing to know the math. For example, you don't need to understand the math to behind the algorithms to know that bcrypt is a reasonable password hashing algorithm and that sha1 and md5 are not, or that salts are used to mitigate issues when users reuse passwords. These are principles that you can understand at a high level without fully understanding the underlying details. If anything, I think that overemphasis on requiring people to learn and understand the math has the effect of over-focusing on simpler algorithms that aren't actually what people want to be using in practice due to the fact that they're easier to teach and often foundational in conveying concepts that would need to be learned to understand the more complicated algorithms.

If using cryptographic algorithms directly requires knowing the math, then I'd agree that most people shouldn't be using them directly, but I'd go further and say that a lack of libraries that are safe for people to use for software engineering without understanding the implementation is a failing of the ecosystem; as much as "regular" software engineering people (like myself!) can struggle with the math behind cryptography, I think that a lot of people developing cryptographic libraries struggle with building reasonable abstractions and making user-friendly APIs (which is a skill I think in general is not emphasized enough for most software engineers, to the detriment of everyone).
Which one have you been using?
CSS is global, so I'd highly recommend against using two separate CSS systems. Even Tailwind introduces several global styles via its own reset. Years ago, I worked on a team that used both Bootstrap and Foundation, and even over the course of 5 years was unable to disentangle them.
>part of what was aledged was the illegal exchange of salary data via surveys

Alleged doesn't mean illegal. In this case this point never saw court; the sides settled.

And what this claimed to have happened is not what is happening here.
Any confusion is Nebula's fault by keeping the details of ownership secret. They could clarify what they mean when they claim in bold on their front page that "Nebula is creator-owned and operated."
A gallery of fonts with SIL license
I think you miss George Carlin, and fear people won't like the real you. Antagonizing strangers around yourself to sabotage ones own happiness out of fear of emotional connections is not a healthy place to live.

Maybe a nice walk in the sun, or volunteer with a local pet-rescue society would help one feel better.

Have a nice day, =3
I think the biggest issue right now is economics and the logistics of expanding and getting a lot of vehicles, but this is easy compared to building a proof of concept of a robotaxi service. It's now just a matter of iteration and economies of scale.

They can already handle quite heavy rain and fog, the only thing missing is snow.
There's no correct answer here. Your choice seems reasonable _if_ you already have some previous familiarity with managing k8s. If not, you might want to consider starting with a managed k8s solution from a cloud provider. The bulk of the work will be containerizing your stack, and getting familiar with all the concepts. You don't want to do all that while also keeping k8s running. After that you would be able to relatively easily migrate to a self-hosted cluster if you need to.

If you do want to self-host, k3s could also be an option, like a sibling comment suggested. It's simpler to start with, though it still has a learning curve since it's a lightweight version of k8s. I reckon that you would still want to run at least 3 nodes for redundancy/failover, and maybe a couple more for just DB workloads. But you can certainly start with one to setup your workflow, and then scale out to more nodes as needed.
Say I have a news article that describes a Government agency with a few departments and people who work in that department. Graphiti gives 2 options

1. Use whatever node and fact schemas Graphiti comes up with will be different everytime because it's using a non-deterministic LLM

2. Input my own schemas

1 will not be standardized deterministically, 2 will require a lot of work from me to figure out how to structure an organization. There are a million edge cases to think through

I think a big value add would be to just automatically use the Organization Ontology [1] and everyone who uses Graphiti on a text block that describes an organization will get that back.

Then defacto everyone's schemas can interact with each other. My business value prop is not going to be in defining an organization's structure, but it's still useful data for me have. Forming good Ontologies takes a lot of work.

I was thinking of just fine tuning my own LLM with RDF ontologies so it always returns graphs formatted in commonly used RDF schemas

[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/

EDIT: Just saw your edit 2 comments above. And yes exactly that is what I think would be useful. I'm looking for a project in this space that is opinionated cause frankly using a graph with a random assortment of node and edge types everytime I run it is not very useful.
You get photo/video storage worth a fraction of a cent. Llama doesn't have a free to use service.

People got 'free service' in exchange for putting ads around content not for this.

It's a terrible deal no one asked the users if they want to agree to.

It's visiting a website and saving an image and claiming the website owes you for storage.
Yeah, a beacon isn't that useful unless you want to require that all pedestrians wear them as well. The only self-driving-car-related serious injuries/deaths I can remember are Uber hitting a pedestrian and Cruise running over a pedestrian.