skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
These are all valid explanations or potentiators for what can cause the phenomena or syndrome, but it doesn't mean that the behavior is accurate to the truth.

She chose to spoke in a way that condemned the police who tried to help you and she chose to spoke kindly to the hostage takers - you can frame everything in anyway you want.

But reality is that police tried to do good for society while hostage takers were actively putting her in risk and trying to take from the society.

To be empathetic to the police, they were also under tremendous stress, and had never seen a situation like that, Sweden had never seen this, and like the article said they hadn't trained for that. They tried to make the best of the bad situation they could, and after managing to have everyone lives intact, they were still condemned by someone who they tried to save, and that someone was speaking kindly of the people who caused the situation in the first place.
The travel isn’t always necessary
just look at what the major labelers are selling - it is exactly that. go to scale ai’s page
You can use Google to search about anything, except the precise details about how the Google search rankings work.
Did their CEO insist on hearings that they are part of the royal family? Also - is Burger King a nonprofit organization? They just want to feed the people? Saviors of the human kind?
If they will employ polish chip engineers, that's a net win for the country in the long term.
Lisp implemented in Rust macros
Fred Wilson – Code Tip Cards
This is useless and lazy nihilism
Can't we make the crawler just a little smarter then to avoid chemistry websites?
>but much worse (and worse even in comparison to GPT4) than English composition

O1 is supposed to be a reasoning model, so I don't think judging it by its English composition abilities is quite fair.

When they release a true next-gen successor to GPT-4 (Orion, or whatever), we may see improvements. Everyone complains about the "ChatGPTese" writing style, and surely they'll fix that eventually.

>Like they hired a few hundred professors, journalists and writers to work with the model and create material for it, so you just get various combinations of their contributions.

I'm doubtful. The most prolific (human) author is probably Charles Hamilton, who wrote 100 million words in his life. Put through the GPT tokenizer, that's 133m tokens. Compared to the text training data for a frontier LLM (trillions or tens of trillions of tokens), it's unrealistic that human experts are doing any substantial amount of bespoke writing. They're probably mainly relying on synthetic data at this point.
but nobody has to pick between “the worst manifestation of counterculture” and “traditionalist monarchism”. you can have a whole range of normal political views instead.
Humans don't require immense amounts of energy to function. The reasons why LLMs do is because we are essentially using brute force as the methodology for making them smarter for the lack of better understanding of how this works. But this then gives us a lot of material to study to figure that part out for future iterations of the concept.
Give me an example of a good-faith disclosure escalated to law enforcement? Some examples come to mind, but the ones I'm thinking of won't support your argument.
Isn't OOP supposed to be about bringing everyday human things as the paradigm for thinking? Stuff like doors, buttons, locks and keys, levers.

There are some good gems in the popular developer culture. "Circuit Breaker" is a de-facto name for an OOP pattern I enjoy. "Dependency Injection" not so much, could be called "Spare Parts Design".

Architectonic styles comes from Christopher Alexander stuff. It's a classic, patterns and GoF comes from that. We could use some of his later _Nature of Order_ stuff as well (the "Order" name I don't like that much though, but it's good content nonetheless).

I think this is the most cognitive (in what it does, not in what it says) we can get without being too geeky for beginners.

Minds to be "educated", maybe? Like we humans do. Small everyday stuff first, then more complicated human things later.

Anyway, about the "modular monolith": what about we just call it a "machine"? We already expect most machines to be modular, and the sum of its parts to do more than its individual components, and the idea that the components are designed and maintaned together.
i don't see why it would be impossible to engage in detailed and personalized conversations with scores of subscribers? a one-on-one detailed and personalized conversation might require half an hour, and if you're an extraverted person you can probably spend ten hours a day doing this, which is a score of people every day. in a 28-day month you could then engage in detailed and personalized conversations with 560 subscribers, which boosts the number from 'scores' to 'hundreds'

if you're talking to them in some kind of textual instant messenger, rather than over the phone or video chat, you can probably maintain two to four detailed and personalized conversations at a time, which would boost that number into the low thousands

you're just conversing with people, not fucking them, and there are in fact real-life prostitutes who serve scores of clients per month

still i'd probably agree if ball had said 'thousands'. but 'scores' sounds easy
QAnon is pretty normie now, so you might rethink your ideology on conventional.
I still use it all the time and have been quite happy with it. I don't do the full-text archiving, though -- never been of interest to me.
"others who I work with who were responsible for bringing me into it" sounded to me like people at your company, who I assumed would be able to add you to the meetings. I guess I might have been mistaken
Wow. That's a fairly old-fashioned exploit. I remember reading about paths in filenames, like, a decade ago.
3. Never do this! Good engineer should get paid better over time and do good engineering. Being for a long time in a role doesn’t make you better at different ones like supervising from engineering.
Few bigger companies in EU wasted a lot of tech talents this way and people most often leave job after being leaders for a moment.
SWE management won’t be a thing either. Hopefully you can find another job.
Wizard of Oz. There is no magic, it's all smoke and mirrors.

The models and prompts are all monkey-patched and this isn't a step towards general superintelligence. Just hacks.

And once you realize that, you realize that there is no moat for the existing product. Throw some researchers and GPUs together and you too can have the same system.

It wouldn't be so bad for ClopenAI if every company under the sun wasn't also trying to build LLMs and agents and chains of thought. But as it stands, one key insight from one will spread through the entire ecosystem and everyone will have the same capability.

This is all great from the perspective of the user. Unlimited competition and pricing pressure.
That's just a summary, not the actual CoT
I addressed model output (infringes copyright if substantially similar, as with manually-created works) and the process of training the model (requires collating/processing ephemeral copies, possibly fair use). What do you think the "real violations" are, if not those?
A notebook with pandas would have had a df.plot().

9.71 Gbps with wg on a 10GBps link with sysctl tunings, custom MTUs,.

I had heard of token ring, but not 10BASE5:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10BASE5
and we've had stories of artificial humans since we've been writing down stories!
Okay, so why wouldn't you be able to whitelist them ahead of time then?
there's no need for jousting at infinities.

as long as there are houses to insulate, jobs to specialize in, unread overnment papers to stop printing, inefficiencies to solve, there's economic growth possible.

the problem is that Greece is a poster child for the EU's problems (and of "developed economies")

it's the state/regional version of the middle-income trap, no one wants to do big projects, because relatively everything is expensive in developed economies (Baumol, permitting is hard, money goes into many inefficient small and important things)

there's no need for asteroid mining, there's need for investing in things that improve productivity, and that's basically cheaper inputs (energy, logistics, other cost of living things like housing!), or improve output (education, competitiveness, better access to markets, decreasing language barriers, making bureaucracy easier and smarter, etc)
I definiteely understand your frustration. I have the same emotional reaction when looking for alternative devices. But really, a cheap phone is the best solution

I recommend using a custom rom with a funky UI (lots to explore!) so it'll feel different from your phone!
> "internal feelings"

I've often thought of using the words "internal reactions" as a euphemism for emotions.
Again, you're stretching definitions into meaninglessness. The way you are using "sampling" and "distribution" here applies to any system processing any information. Yes, humans as well.

I can trivially define the entirety of all nerve impulses reaching and exiting your brain as a "distribution" in your usage of the term. And then all possible actions and experiences are just "sampling" that "distribution" as well. But that definition is meaningless.
> Is there?

The difference is that talking about a framework with passion doesn't generally end up with severe real world consequences for other people.

The difference between tech and people is that people are... people. They have lives, feelings, all those fun human things. Passionately talking about how X group of people should die (or <insert rhetoric of your choice>) is quite different than passionately talking about how Y framework is the worst thing programmers have ever concocted. Generally the latter won't end up with someone getting stabbed. (Generally...)

> What if Facebook, instead, said "Fat workers are too bloated, you should hire skinny workers"? Or if HN said "so and so projects are all ____ and they should all be ____, and oh, your vacuum doesn't suck".

I think this is a terribly unfair switcharoo to make. Let's fill in the blanks for that second quote.

> "so and so group of people are all inhuman and they should all be killed, and oh, your mom sucks"

> "so and so projects are all terrible and they should all be deleted, and oh, your vacuum doesn't suck"
OK, I asked. "A lot" is about 20%.
Everyone who thinks that they know how their documentation should be indexed should take a look at the Permuted Symbol Index <https://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Front/X_Sy...> from the Common Lisp Hyper Spec. <https://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Front/inde...>. The rest of the CLHS is very… old–school. Very complete and useful, but definitely from an earlier age.
This is the answer. This comment could have replaced that entire medium article and saved us all a lot of time.
Vue.js: A Speed Demon or Just a High-Risk Gambler?
This reminds a bit of the "it's useless to do anything here, China should cut their emissions, not us, we're a mere drop in the ocean!"

Which of course means that we can solve climate change by dividing the earth into smaller countries, all too small to have any positive effect by cleaning up their act :)
It's just Ilya typing really fast.
[dupe] Earlier: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41526086
First of all this is irrelevant to GP's comment. Second of all, while these products do have net negative impact, we as a society knew about it and failed to act. Everyone is to blame about it.
Im so done with artists and moral apostle speeches. They contribute nothing to the conversation. They work on a hypothetical humanity - that never was real. That adheres to laws and strifes for unity in economic crisis times. Well bad news, it falls apart into war-mongering little tribes going fascist in crisis times. The capitalist bonanza did not bring forth a new mankind and to think it could contract without strife after some stern speeches is a insult to anyone with a brain. Meanwhile - others have worked day and night, to bring about this ability for self-control and stability in economic crisis and they get zero-acclaim- even criticism by the deluded.
We got a pan-opticon now, with everyone looking at everything and shaming atrocious behavior even where government fails. We have endless entertaiment, that has reduced emissions of 8 billion people going full west and kept us sane even during those environment paradise time in covid lockdown. We have managed to accumulate a ton of old people, which will not riot and rebel en mass during the worst period of climate change. We are as prepared as we can get for the shit thats about to go down, as we can get, and its defnatly not due to artists and moral preachers standing on soap boxes, yelling at the crowd to feel good about themselves. I wish i had a stone, so i could throw it and connect some reality disenfranchised writer back to the ground truth.
The downside of all manual espresso machines is that it's difficult to achieve good and consistent head temperatures. Pre-heating takes additional time in the brewing process.
It will die when it stops being such blatant, in-your-face trolling by SamA.
> By running this self reflectively, one can create a sentient artificial intelligence.

Or, you can create a recursive chain of self-modification that adds endless erroring cruft code. AI is great at creating long-winded boilerplate of dubious quality, which is exactly what you wouldn't want from a self-modifying program. It is practically guaranteed that such a program would destroy itself before making anything truly novel.

> The AI compiler can be self-compiled to create an AI OS. Which can then run its contained AI compiler to recompile to create a cloud AI OS.

Aww I love this. AI begat AI Compiler, son of AI. AI Compiler begat AI OS, whom begat a Cloud AI OS again. No idea what any of it means though.
Exactly, which is why intangible costs will tend to be overpriced compared to risks with low cost ceilings, like "paying out an extra bounty".
> repl'd into prod to do work

Like for debugging production problems and fixing customer data? Or for normal development?

If its the former that's a great use of technology, and if its the latter it sound insane.
i think it's funny, every time you implement a clever solution to call gpt and get a decent answer, they get to use your idea in their product. what other project gets to crowdsource ideas and take credit for them like this?

ps: actually maybe Amazon marketplace. probably others too.
>I am also a freediver, and it is well known that hyperventilating before holding your breath is a deadly thing to do in the water, because it can cause blackout- and that seems to be what people are (incorrectly) doing here.

Coincidentally, Wim Hof and his technique came out in a conversation with a friend last night, and when he mentioned that hyperventilating was a big part of it I told him that it was a contraindication for epileptic people like me.

Actually, they diagnosed me by wiring me to an EEG machine while hyperventilating on purpose. I lost consciousness in the middle of the study.
Could you expand on how you think the new model increased accuracy in this class of problem in a way that's unrelated to its significantly higher token and compute usage?
But it also means little freedom to move. There are a lot of tasks they can’t perform in those suits.

Also thermal management seemed to be an issue, as they were restricted to operate in the shadow of the spacecraft.

Good for a v0.1 beta.
That's definitely weird, and I wonder how legal it is.
What a horrible reframing (and re-blaming) of the problem of censorship!

It also seems to miss entirely that freedom of speech is freedom of speech for really ugly things we dislike. That's the point.
You are not seeing the actual CoT, but rather an LLM-generated summary of it (and you don't know how accurate said summary is).
Well at least you know you weren't lazy/ignorant.

It's just that your tools make you look that way... and cost you more money in extra bandwidth as well. I hope that's the last of the surprises in that area.
Software engineer, or IFSAC Apparatus Operator engineer? On the west coast we absolutely refer to our pumping apparatuses as fire engines; when Engine 813 is dispatched from our station to a call we bring the whole vehicle and not just the engine block!
> In my honest opinion, a partially planned thing helps you course-correct for survival or growth faster rather than a perfect planned thing where you spent so much time on so many things, and in the end you find out that this whole thing didn't work as planned.

Then it wasn't a perfect plan, because it would have worked out perfectly, right?

This is one of the big sticking point between BDUF and non-BDUF approaches. Spending inordinate amounts of time creating a plan that won't survive is not valuable, it's wasteful. Spend enough time to create enough of a plan, then execute and refine. How much is enough? Hire me and I'll tell you. More seriously, gain experience in executing and you'll figure out when it's time to just start and stop sitting on your ass in meetings all day. The context of your effort, your team's level of experience with the domain, and a few other factors are what help to determine the switchover point from planning to executing.
You've moved the goal posts of this discussion. We've been talking about military success or failure.

Democracy (and "comfortable lives") was not a military objective. The military provided security for the State Dept and NGOs to pursue those goals.

Since 9/11, Afghanistan has not prosecuted any terrorist acts on the West in my recent memory.

The Taliban of 2001 was largely killed off. Yes, there are people in charge of Afghanistan today who call themselves Taliban, have some limited pre-9/11 leadership, but are largely a completely different set of people than existed back then and this occurred because of military action, not old age.
i suspect they can detect that in a similar way to capchas and "verify you're human by clicking the box".
CoT is literally just telling an LLM to "reason through it step by step", so that it talks itself through the solution instead of just giving the final answer. There's no searching involved in any of that.
Compared to 600 or 6000 times faster on a GPU though?
How can you be so sure? I've seen a documentary that detailed the experiences of a prince from abroad working in fast food after being sent to the US to get some life experience before getting married. Maybe it's more common than you think.
Too bad for them that they're actively failing at keeping their moat. They're consistently ahead by barely a few months, not enough to hold a moat. They also can't trap customers as chatbots are literally the easiest tech to transition to different suppliers if needed.
Famous Roman siege thought to have lasted years ended in 'mere weeks'-New study
It's really unfortunate people cannot fathom how insignificant your butt in an airplane seat, that will take off with or without you, really is.

This climate change thing really has become people's new religion. Deny anything that doesn't align with the religion. Commit to meaningless gestures. Say your three hail marys. Who can suffer the most in the name of our lord? It makes you a better person, don't you know?
Arguing that travel you don't like is unnecessary because it harms the environment?

Yes, that is useless and lazy nihilism.

OP is arguing that observed preferences are far more reliable indicators of what people actually value than what people say to surveyors/the press/reddit/HN. That's not "nilhilism", it's just a fact. Presumably, academics travel to conferences because they're getting value out of it, and they deem that value worth whatever costs they believe it incurs.
Prometheus Metrics with Rails and Kamal
The ignorance of this thread. You are making it sound like you are going to a another planet and want to know if the local aliens are hostile or not.

Greece is a developed western country, and has a large amount of tourists, millions of them every year, and a very developed tourist industry (one of the most developed per capita in the world) and has been doing it for decades, and is happy to take your money, and doesn't care where some of the snowflakes are coming from.

I personally didn't like Athens that much, but the islands are great to visit. The whole region (from Greece, Albania, Montenegro, Croatia, Slovenia, and all the way to Italy) is a blast to visit.
They can charge whatever they want.
Is it that teenagers might fake having hearing issues in order to wear pods? Either they will be paying attention in class or they won't; this will be obvious from their grades shortly.

You can ignore lectures, not participate in teacher-led activities, generally be a nuisance, and still get an A such that your parents would never catch on to you.
Indeed. Around the time that Supersize Me came out I was looking to lose some weight. To prove a point to my friends I did this by going on a fast food diet. Unlike Spurlock, I actually tracked my calorie intake and this affected what I ordered. However, every meal came from one of McDs, BK, or Wendy's as there was one of each in my neighborhood.

I did indeed lose the belly fat I wanted to shed.

I'm sure it wasn't the healthiest thing I ever did, but from the perspective of fat loss it worked AOK
I see this one as the saddest - if you are making good products the company will finally die.
VW (with Audi and Porsche) failing to deliver quality products is the top group. Apple crushing iOS release after release and becoming trillion dollar company.

Maybe that’s just the way to live and lead the company and market and I just should stop dreaming about quality.
Well, it helps to imagine what the components would do in your head... What do you need me to clarify?

I'm aware of the potential for said program to run into a memory error, however that does not take away from its novel and very possible innovative potential.
I suppose it's a question of what you care about.

If your only concern is keeping other people from believing "the wrong thing", sure censors can effectively prevent the spread of any single "bad" idea. But bad ideas, as you point out, have habit of growing like weeds.

You can't expect censors to be able to effectively manage and filter the flood of new ideas generated every day, evaluating how much truth vs fiction they contain. They must necessarily use blunt instruments which restrict the spread of true information as well. So, if you care about having as many true facts available to yourself as possible however, you can't trust censors to provide it for you.

The truth (or the closest thing we have to the truth, as many truths aren't even available to us, either because we lack the tools to determine them or because they simply haven't been thought up yet) will always surface in an unconstrained information ecosystem because truths have the benefit of accurately describing reality, something people are inherently interested in. The truth might not always be the most popular or accessible idea, but it is incredibly resilient
Yeah, that is a worry: maybe OpenAI's business model and valuation rest on reasoning abilities becoming outdated and atrophying outside of their algorithmic black box, a trade secret we don't have access too. It struck me as an obvious possible concern when the o1 announcement released, but too speculative and conspiratorial to point out - but how hard they're apparently trying to stop it from explaining its reasoning in ways that humans can understand is alarming.