skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It seems like you're drawing an arbitrary line in the sand to determine what things are natural versus what things are unnatural. Furthermore, it seems like you think by definition, unnatural is negative.

By your logic, writing things down is also unnatural and we should've kept with the oral tradition only.

Natural is stepping on a piece of metal, contracting tetanus, and dying without appropriate medical treatment.
I heard this was done on purpose because they'd need a lot more documentation if the system was important, and having redundancy would tip off the FAA to its importance.
You cannot publish games with homebrew, it has to use the official SDK. Besides that, almost nobody has a jailbroken Switch, so it would make it extremely hard to play any games on anything but an emulator.
This doesn’t address my question whatsoever

In fact, it muddies the question itself by distracting away from measurable criteria towards vague and general, broad sweeping conceptual ideas of “Unhealthy” “Unsustainable”
No I dont consider myself so important that I am above interacting with anybody, nor do I think my opinions are better or more correct than anybody elses.

I think even if you were to spend your life just getting to know and educating 1 bigotted person so much so that they change they views just a little, that would be a life well spent.
This is an ancient and universal idea, that has failed to deliver prosperity and growth, and often drives societies that were once flourishing into starvation.

Capitalism is the new, cool, unique idea that has actually delivered prosperity for society. Not perfectly evenly, but certainly more evenly than other ideas like socialism, fascism and feudalism.
Revenue per employee isn't a useful metric here IMHO.

If Company A sells $100M of televisions which they imported for $95M they've made $5M in profit.

If Company B sells $100M of search ads which they served for $1M they've made $99M in profit.

From a revenue perspective they're equal - but $1M invested in Company A produces a 5% return on investment, while the same $1M invested in Company B has a 9900% ROI.
> While management had all the power, including the power to fire bad workers and to hire better ones. Including the power to force workers into compulsory training courses, including the power to create a system of incentives that would encourage good work, and so on.

That would be true if there wasn't a union. They place limits on who Boeing can hire and fire and have to agree to any changes in incentives.
C++ programmer′s guide to undefined behavior: part 5 of 11
He also directed Bumblebee, perhaps the only great film in the Transformers universe.
> especially when evaluated on the first snap answer

The whole point of o1 is that it wasn't "the first snap answer", it wrote half a page internally before giving the same wrong answer.
Right, I was careful to say "generated javadoc", but that nuance might not have been obvious. The author's point is not about the syntax you use to write documentation, it's about the experience you have consuming it. (And FWIW, Java 23 supports Markdown comments[0]).

Re: "introductional/topical contents", this is what package-info.java files are for.

0) https://openjdk.org/jeps/467
How to escape try/catch JavaScript hell
To be fair, not all definitions of Zionism refer to colonizing the area around jerusalem. More generally, zionism is around creating a jewish state and controlling their own destiny.
Was going to say… I love the practical engineering channel but that channel doesn’t really dive deep enough into any one topic to encounter any factual inaccuracies.
This subject brings up so much rancor that I think you might have missed the possibility that there was no sarcasm intended in the post you responded to.
> It probably depends on your problem space

Makes me wonder if the medical doctors can ever blame the LLM over other factors for killing their patients.
It's an improvement until someone wants to copy and paste a negative number, then suddenly the closest heavy object to the user is travelling rapidly towards your head.
Branson is supposed to be a really decent chap.

I suspect a lot of it has to do with who you surround yourself with, and how much agency you give them.

One word that rich people almost never hear, is “no.” Even really nice ones don't hear it often.

That means that almost any rectally-sourced, harebrained idea they squeeze out, is treated as genius, by their entourage.

I know a number of fairly wealthy people, and some of them won’t have anything to do with me, because I say the “N” word. Others, actually ask me what I think.

People rapidly learn that asking me for my input means getting an answer that is honest, but not one they might want to hear (and that answer might be "I don't know.").

They don’t always give it much weight, but at least they ask.

Those folks are not always the ones you might consider “nice,” though.

Just anectdata, though, and the community we share has some traits that reward Honesty and seeking counsel from others.
Maybe instead of relying on "luck" you should organize. Your employer is certainly organized to maximize their benefit, why shouldn't you be?
It is simple as, biodiversity is preferable to a monoculture. The specifics of achieving that is murky and may seem arbitrary, but the overall goal is pretty clear. Humans are the only organisms that can reason about it, so human should act like the "adults in the room" and practice stewardship to maintain some level of biodiversity, regardless of what was human caused or non-human caused.
>zionism is the belief that the jews have the right to live in their ancestral homeland (ancient judea), ///which is not at the expense of anyone else.///

Somewhat dubious.
Wow, they built a drivable 1:1 LEGO Technic McLaren P1 and got Lando Norris to drive it around Silverstone? That's really wild! I'm wondering how you come up with the tessellation they used on the body and all the stress test associated with testing such a huge model. Big congrats to the team, 8000 hours to deliver seems quite low for such a huge achievement to be honest.
A great example of how design of good products should be guided by the end goal instead of by the technical mechanism, when possible. You went out of your way to make sure the functionality was not limited by a certain single mechanism.
Someone actually did a blind study comparing flat vs conical grinders with over 150 coffee professionals [0] to find they could not discern a difference in how the coffee was ground before being brewed while controlling for other variables.

So it would seem that Audiophiles are the perfect analogy.

0: https://youtu.be/3XYTi6OBecA?t=2400 (Discussion on the study begins around 34:00)
Ubuntu TV was such a shame that it basically was a tech demo, and died there.
correct, my point is op seems to carry an emotional burden with the word "zionism". which is really only explained by the recent (since 10/7) media cycles IMO.
The accusations of it being a scam are speculative for sure, but they come from a relatable place: the inability to understand why creators would agree to take on "shadow equity" while a small handful of creators get actual real equity.

It sounds like a few creators can sell the equity that is built by many creators at any time, but that all the other creators can only realize their equity if and when the company exits.

If someone bought tickets to a steam ship that stipulated that in the event of an imminent iceberg collision, they can only get on the life-boats after a small group of people ransacked the ship and left on the first life-boat, I might assume that they'd been scammed to. But perhaps they were just desperate or didn't think icebergs were a risk. Regardless, I just know I wouldn't buy that ticket.
It just looks like an ugly version of rust.
The quoted section is about net revenue, which in this article means total revenue minus the payouts to creators. In other worse, revenue minus COGS. It's a valid comparison.
The API returns how many tokens were used in reasoning, so it would be easy to see any average change in reasoning token consumption. And token prices in general have been extremely deflationary over the last 18 months.
>which is not at the expense of anyone else

I think that's the contentious part, as the establishment of modern Isreal has come at great expense to many others- I don't think their religious nature in and of itself is much of an issue with most of their critics. Though I'm not sure that's what the original commenter was implying
"It seems like nobody wants to work these days" has been a refrain since ancient Mesopotamia!
Interesting. I wouldn't have guessed teens would have the money. I'd have guessed the cash cows would be adult, well-employed.

But if it's a common scenario for an adult OF creator to be sexually interacting with an underage teenager online (and, really, "grooming" them), are we going to start seeing life-ruining prosecutions of creators?

Incidentally including subpoenas of lists of creators and consumers, for additional chilling effect on both?

If so, could that kill OF's business, at least for Western creators, as well as for some consumers?

And if OF ends up with creators mostly in non-Western countries, with a reputation for preying upon UK/US/etc. teens (and maybe even reports of human trafficking, and/or funding sanctioned parties), will OF be banned in many Western countries? Maybe the most lucrative ones?

Separate from serious questions about what's ethical and healthy for everyone, given that the topic is OF's economics, I wonder whether they're making so much money because they're too close to the line of what's legally sustainable.
Strange title, since we've known for a long time that Mars has an atmosphere unlike our own.
No, anybody is free to fork any codebase under AGPL and also free to contribute to the original projects under a CLA if that's what they want.

Users are free to use the version under AGPL, there is no poison pill.
> Two-word phrases are rarely preferable to a single word.

I think you wanted to write "diwords are raripotiorous than monowords".
see my comment that's getting downvoted, of all the singular religious majority states it has the lowest of that single majority. muslims hold the highest position in the land.

why do you believe zionism is at the expense of other religions?
I didn't even bother using ADB with Projectify launcher from the Play Store (it just has a couple settings I needed to enable to take over the home button) and I haven't seen the default launcher once. I am using an Onn Pro 4k on my main TV (for Ethernet) and CCwGTV on the others.

Incredibly snappy setup with detailed customization options, I switched all my TVs over to use it. I also recommend Button Remapper to customize the remote app buttons to your liking.
Setting aside land and limiting or not allowing development of it so that it can be publicly available for enjoyment of nature or hunting and fishing is a laudable endeavour.

Banning all human presence and use of large swaths of land, on the other hand, is right up there with medieval Royal forest laws[0] and I suspect it serves the same purpose.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_forest
I am curious about this too but haven't had the time to give it a try. Looking forward to hear about experiences.
In my experience were really bad at figuring out when something more than about 5 years out is going to happen so 10-20 years is much worse than a coin flip. That's partially because we don't know what second and third order problems could come up, but also because interest/investment could change rapidly. For example, if some other probabilistic method of factoring primes (or even NP complete problems!) were discovered that would massively reduce funding for QC.

And yeah, there's a time value of money, inflation, repayment risk, and a zillion things that vary the value of a long term bet's payout, but at ~3-6%/yr they don't affect it by more than a few factors of 2. The risk of having all the world's stored encrypted data decrypted after the fact makes even a miniscule risk that QCs can break RSA or other encryption too big to accept. Those scale by many factors of 10.
> A mother can have a male gender.

Then it would be a father, misgendering him as a mother is not nice.
Two economists are walking in a forest when they come across a pile of shit.

The first economist says to the other “I’ll pay you $100 to eat that pile of shit.” The second economist takes the $100 and eats the pile of shit.

They continue walking until they come across a second pile of shit. The second economist turns to the first and says “I’ll pay you $100 to eat that pile of shit.” The first economist takes the $100 and eats a pile of shit.

Walking a little more, the first economist looks at the second and says, "You know, I gave you $100 to eat shit, then you gave me back the same $100 to eat shit. I can't help but feel like we both just ate shit for nothing."

"That's not true", responded the second economist. "We increased the GDP by $200!"

https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/qp49wz/two_economist...
> OF models [...] using AI for [answering DM responses]

This seems like OF's Etsy trap moment.

On the one hand, scaling creator:individual_fan multiples via AI assisted messaging = $$$ (to creators and OF)

On the other hand, it canabalizes their core business value tenet -- authenticity.

It'll be curious to see which path they choose, and if it ends up playing out similar to Etsy. I.e. temporarily increasing their revenue while erroding their brand, then having to tack back once they realize how dire things have gotten in customers' eyes.
Thats a fine opinion, and I fully agree with you.

However its slightly different to the discussed point here, which is that people who use their dick or vagina to make money publicly can later have that used against them.

Theres nothing wrong with dating a sex worker, but when you want to make them a wife and have children, there becomes a risk that some crazy drug addict is going to spot them in the future and do something. Mabye they are going to call out to your wife while she is dropping the kids off at school. Maybe they will be a bit more sinister and threaten to send old OF videos to your kids ands kids teachers email address unless you give them some money, or do it again etc.

These are of course hypotheticals, but they have happened in the past and it is a risk, however small, of having an ex sex worker as a life partner.
You're conflating political and economic systems here. Capitalism is fully compatible with fascism. And it emerged out of and is an evolution of manorialism, the economic system used under european feudalism.
Ask HN: Procedural generation, creative coding artists / communities / resources
Hey HN!

Looking for inspiration / cool artists to follow re/ creative (visual) coding.

Stuff I already follow and recommend:

* shadertoy [0] and Inigo Quilez [1]

* Amy Goodchild [2]

* Oleg Dolya aka watabou [3] (author of Pixel Dungeon [4])

* r/proceduralgeneration [5]

* Daniel Shiffman aka The Coding Train [6], Nature of Code [7]

* OpenProcessing [8]

Any more recommendations?

[0] www.shadertoy.com

[1] iquilezles.org

[2] www.amygoodchild.com

[3] watabou.github.io

[4] watabou.itch.io/pixel-dungeon

[5] www.reddit.com/r/proceduralgeneration

[6] thecodingtrain.com

[7] natureofcode.com

[8] openprocessing.org
I guess the the CPU/cluster and cluster/chiplet ratios change from generation to generation?
Parasocial relationships don't require interaction, you could just watch a twitch streamer a lot. I think if we defined it by requiring interaction we would underestimate the percieved impact of these social phenomenon.
> There also is nothing "productive" about paying for salaries, equipment and training to a bunch of grown men in the anticipation that you have to send them to do violence to your bidding.

I disagree. First and only rule of nature is might makes right, and being capable of dishing out the most violence (and hence also least likely to be the victim of it) is very “productive”. It is a huge contributor to the purchasing power of the US dollar, which is a referendum on the stability and productivity of US society.

For example, the oceanic transportation routes around the world are kept mostly safe and humming along because of militaries enforcing it.
Please do something that you don't know.
Not to my knowledge. But new processors solve the problem differently, by running active code very fast on very small feature size lithography, and then entering deep sleep to achieve really low duty cycles. They do really well, achieving impressive numbers of microwatts per MHz:

https://www.eembc.org/ulpmark/ulp-cp/scores.php

I expect that if you wrote code using the power management features of modern platforms, you'd blow that sapphire process on an obsolete node size out of the water.

No idea whether a modern node size on that low-leakage substrate would be any better if it existed...
Jewish land acquisition in Palestine before 1948 was often through legal purchases from Arab landowners.

However, not all left; those who remained within the borders of what became Israel after 1948 were granted citizenship.

If you're referring to the Nakba, Palestinian Arabs were instructed by their own leadership or neighboring Arab states to leave their homes temporarily to facilitate military operations against the newly declared state of Israel.

The displacement of Palestinians was a consequence of war, not solely a deliberate act by Jewish forces
Can you share more details about your setup, really interested in this kind of idea for some topics I'm studying right now.
You don't run a Dockerfile on every machine, and a bash script doesn't produce an image. They're not even solving the same problem.
Isabelle also has a fairly large set of mathematical proofs and supporting libraries, see https://www.isa-afp.org.

People routinely publish new proofs there, it is actually a regular referred journal.
Perhaps. LLMs are trained to be as human-like as possible, and you most definitely need to know how the individual human you are asking works if you want a reliable answer. It stands to reason that you would need to understand how an LLM works as well.

The good news is that if you don't have that understanding, at least you'll laugh it off with "Boy, that LLM technology just isn't ready for prime time, is it?". In contrast to when you don't understand how the human works – that leads to, at very least name calling (e.g. "how can you be so stupid?!"), a grander fight, even all out war at the extreme end of the spectrum.
No I'm referring to how the chain of thought transcript seems like the output of two instances talking to each other.
If you can't actually tweak audiogram settings, they're not really hearing aids. In fact, Samsung doesn't sell them as hearing aids and from what I can tell never use the term "hearing aid" in any of the marketing, branding, or feature listing of the devices.

They're not FDA approved as hearing aids, so they're not hearing aids.

Either way, pointing to another company being shitty isn't really a good justification of the first company being shitty.
By definition and per every observable statistic, most people do not carry iPhones around.
It could be compliance/moderation efforts, this is not specified
Biden finalizes increases to China tariffs
> For example, if you want to specify that a sort function actually sorts the input list, you might find that the type specification ends up not much shorter than the actual code of the function. And apart from raw effort, this means that your type specifications start being large enough that they have their own bugs.

Not to mention the tools to debug complex type errors are generally much less mature than the tools to debug runtime errors.

But even so, I think we could still benefit from going a little further towards the "proof" end of the type system spectrum in most cases. I don't think anyone really wants to deal with Coq and similar, but having used a language with dependent types for integers and vector lengths it's really nice to be able to say stuff like "this integer is in the range [0, 8)" and then have it catch errors when you pass it to a function that expects [0, 3) or whatever.
How is a solo classical pianist's concert any less staged, rehearsed or repeated performance than any other concert, other than a (not so) vague sense of elitism?

Unless you're close, you're not catching the nuance of the pianist's hands any more than guitar licks from a guitar frontman. Indeed, many modern pianists are following in the footsteps of rock concerts and having live video camera work to capture these details for people not in the front 10 rows.

All this does is give vibes of "Area Man Constantly Mentioning He Doesn't Own A Television" (https://theonion.com/area-man-constantly-mentioning-he-doesn...).
As an example, the Amazon implementation doesn't refer to gcc's[1] and clang's[2] "zero_call_used_regs" to zeroise CPU registers upon return or exception of functions working on crypto secrets. OpenSSL doesn't either.[3] firedancer _does_ use "zero_call_used_regs" to allow gcc/clang to zeroise used CPU registers.[9]

As another example, the Amazon implementation also doesn't refer to gcc's "strub" attribute which zeroises the function's stack upon return or exception of functions working on crypto secrets.[4][5] OpenSSL doesn't either.[3] firedancer _does_ use the "strub" attribute to allow gcc to zeroise the function's stack.[9]

Is there a performance impact? [6] has the overhead at 0% for X25519 for implementing CPU register and stack zeroisation. Compiling the Linux kernel with "CONFIG_ZERO_CALL_USED_REGS=1" for x64_64 (impacting all kernel functions) was found to result in a 1-1.5% performance penalty.[7][8]

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attribute...

[2] https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#zero-cal...

[3] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/discussions/24321

[4] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.2.0/gcc/Common-Type-At...

[5] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Stack-Scrubbing.html

[6] https://eprint.iacr.org/2023/1713.pdf

[7] https://www.phoronix.com/review/zero-used-regs/5

[8] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210505191804.4015873-1-keesco...

[9] FD_FN_UNSANITIZED: https://github.com/firedancer-io/firedancer/blob/master/src/...
The issue is that you can't use the other tools of the terminal like grepping and friends on a TUI. You can get semi-dynamic behavior with stuff like piping into fzf, maybe there's something like this for JSON collapsing too?
AlexNet was really what kicked off the latest round of advances in ML. When was that, 2011? 2012? It has obviously been blown into the weeds by later work, at least from a raw performance standpoint, but how would you measure or compare its efficiency with current models? Let's see some numbers.
If the challenge here is on conceptual framing of wild lands, if there were to be any movement from the word and concepts tied to "wilderness", why not something like "stewarded"? This recognizes, for example, historical Indigenous practices of managing land without allowing for plunder or party. Instead, it elevates wilderness as something to be protected, cherished, and looked after - also in opposition to the neglect of "wilderness".
Yes - it's fun that its a bit messy, but it also seems to write the same letter in very different ways in the same session. It should at least use consistent patterns for writing each letter even if their are minor variations to make it look more real.
Bezos doesn’t know how to build good hardware. Plenty of examples from Amazon. Then add Blue Origin to that track record.
That’s why I asked
> Just like some women lose attraction when they learn that you subscribe to OF content.

Well said.