skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thank you as well, for sharing these notes about your setup. Indeed concentrating everything in the same monitoring system is very helpful as it reduces the cognitive load. You can likely do the same with Icinga.

Feel free to reach out on Linkedin if you need some more details. More than happy to share.
Chain of Responsibility – To Use It or Not to Use It
No, the flag is for the tone. Disagree with substance all you want. Don't write like a troll. Don't attack people personally. There are lots of other places you can do that; don't do it here.
I've now used both professionally. I look forward to hopefully using both in the same project. Though not holding my breath.
Ironically, Fox News' reporting on domestic affairs in the US is far more reliable than most Western reporting on China. That's not to compliment Fox News, but just to give you an idea of how poor reporting on China is.

If you want to know about China, the SCMP is a decent source. Caixin is also good, but it's more focused on economics. Also, speaking Chinese and following Chinese social media is a thousand times more informative than any Western news source about China.
Emacs. Normally i read it locally but the web version is just as comprehensive.
See https://hexdocs.pm/ - search for anything and click on the links.

Documentation facilities in Elixir are extremely powerful, as you can use Elixir to generate the documentation itself! See e.g. the way UML diagrams are embedded here: https://hexdocs.pm/say_cheez_ex/readme.html#uml-dot-graphs - nothing stops you from creating them dynamically based on external information, test results, external services or whatnot.
Its not remotely the same as the ready box, because the ready box sends its signal before the measurement directions have been chosen.

It would be equivalent to the ready box if your filtering happened without any reference to the measurement choices our outcomes.

If you're still unhappy with role of the ready box we can instead talk about either of the two purely photonic experiments which didn't use anything similar.

> The universe tell you whether to select or not (it's not you missing events).

In your numerics it is exactly missing events, there are a bunch of events and you postselect to keep only some of them. If you mean a different model you're going to need a python script which does something else.

>Nature's is fuzzy and experimenters will always have to define box boundaries (spatial, temporal, and entanglement-pair selection boxes)

Sure, but in each of the experiments I linked the selection in the experiments loses a small enough fraction of the events that the detection loophole is closed.
It seems more nuanced.

X (government abuse of online censorship, not Twitter) is bad. Bad person Y says X is bad. Now suddenly X is good.

The irony being that everyone equated Y with batman a year or two ago.
that's a good idea I will look into making it. thanks and please let me know if you have any other recommendation.
AOL exists on every modern walled garden (unfortunately)
Not quite classless, but milligram looks pretty good.
If you are a company facing bankruptcy because your process technology is not competitive with world leaders like TSMC and Samsung, you resort to military work. Intel is like the Boeing of the semiconductor industry except it might be less crucial to the industry.
THIS. Yes, I understand why HN wants to discourage "editorial" titles from submitters. OTOH, less-bad web sites often put the actual sober facts in the subtitles - as was done here. Maybe if HN allowed submitters to use those instead, when the title is just click-bait?
For a product: Delphi 2. I don't think I ever saw a better offline documentation which is so self-contained

For a project: MDN, they refactored the Web's JS documentation
Question is if it is really that toxic. There are many successful people on X.
You can always follow who you want and manage topics of interest. It is quite possible to avoid both deranged Trump haters and Biden/Kamala haters who don’t add value.
Honestly, I just don’t buy it’s impossible to properly handle global taxation.

Governments do it just fine for normal individuals. Small to medium businesses also pay their taxes pretty fairly. It says something profound about the system, if the avoidance needs large complicated structures to do so.

Something something lack of moral compass.
Didnt he pump a ton of money their way? Was any of it recovered?
Laws requiring permission from the land owner to use a metal detector and dig vs. needing such permission on your own land seems very different IMO.

The English law seems focused on preventing trespassing and digging holes in people's yards, and also to make sure the land owner gets compensated for anything of value found. (e.g. from the link by madax below: In England "An experienced detectorist, Davies would have known he was entitled to half of the proceeds of legal sale of the treasure, instead choosing to deprive the landowner and public by stealing this exceptional and significant treasure.")

The Irish law seems focused on preventing anything from being found.
In researching for my own PhD I was surprised to find that there was no focused academic treatment of hypermedia controls. For example, Fielding mentions them only in passing in the introduction of his thesis. As this concept was a key motivating idea, leading both intercoolerjs/htmx and hyperview I felt a formal definition that went beyond the web was a useful contribution, and peers in the hypermedia community agreed. I hope that this definition and generalization leads to further advancement in hypermedia systems such as the web.
Not really, google specifically doesn't want you to run chromecast receivers on commodity hardware. There are some hacks and reverse engineering attempts but they are not very reliable.
When you are facing bankruptcy and/or flunked out of school because fellow students like TSMC and Samsung blew you out of the water, moving back to Mom’s house is better than dying on the streets.
thank you very much for sharing this!
It's Android (TV boxes), not (Android TV) boxes.
I figured you weren't personally against interns.

More like, the prevailing attitude will be using AI to reduce labor costs at the lowest level, effectively gutting the ability to build a knowledge base for profit.

My snark was to add to that exposure.
> $DAYJOB == "facebook"?

Nah. AFAIK, we don't have any Linux kernel gurus on the payroll... we're ordinary users just like most everyone else.
Do you add milk or sugar to your tea? Or both? Or neither?!

What's your favorite biscuit. Asking as a yank who likes tea and biscuits.
Opinion polling in Germany: https://www.infratest-dimap.de/umfragen-analysen/bundesweit/...
It’s a UX designer. I don’t particularly like crowdstrike, but this person will know very little about their kernel Drivers.
I completely agree that most people don't need that. This is always what people say when k8s comes up. This is also what people said about git 15 years ago (you're not the kernel etc). But the thing is you don't have to use any of the bits you don't need. At first I listened to the naysayers and was wary of k8s thinking it would create more problems than it solves. That simply hasn't been the case. It's not a no-brainer, there are tradeoffs, but I really think it makes sense especially if you're doing docker anyway. Like I said in another comment, people tend to talk about two different things. There's k8s which can be as little as just a single node k3s server which is basically docker compose with a few extras like automatic rollout etc. Then there's the over the top "cloud native" stuff. One does not imply the other.
> Are there any cameras out there that output real raw data from the senors?

I suspect not, because the data output rate from a high end sensor can easily be 32 Gbps, and I don't think any phones have fast enough flash storage to write data at 32Gbps.

You have to process the data in mostly-realtime or lose the data. Storing it isn't an option.
Grey Market
WaveTracker – Make music by drawing soundwaves
This could be good. Because then other car companies likely can’t do it. Also Ford does not have to implement it.
I wish he had talked more about his movie collection. I’m interested in the methods of selecting initial items as well as ones that survive in the collection for 10+ years.
Do server applications ever optimize for ARM-equivalent of AVX512?

Given that AWS heavily uses Graviton, I assume so? But I never hear of them - only AVX512 optimizations.
I'm curious what you think is happening here as your answer seems to imply it is thinking (and indeed rushing to an answer somehow). Do you think the generative AI has agency or a thought process? It doesn't seem to have anything approaching that to me, nor does it answer quickly.

It seems to be more like a weighing machine based on past tokens encountered together, so this is exactly the kind of answer we'd expect on a trivial question (I had no confusion over this question, my only confusion was why it was so basic).

It is surprisingly good at deceiving people and looking like it is thinking, when it only performs one of the many processes we use to think - pattern matching.
> And for those fortunate to be longtime Nvidia shareholders, there is a bag coming soon with the Nvidia H100 processor behind ChatGPT-4 that will go for 2^16, or $65,536.

There's pics on the Shopify store: https://gpupurse.com/products/h100-purse, and I love the description:

> Purse that has a rare one of a kind gpt-4 training gpu.
> This purse is subject to export controls.
18TB drives didn’t exist back when this setup was designed.

Of course a 3 bay with 128TB drives would also be superior, but this comment only makes sense in a few years.
Full-sized mirror/mirrorless cameras do that. Sensor is HUGE, optics is very fine and huge as well. Due to how universe works, you can't get similar results with tiny sensor and optics
> If Apple is giving you JPEG-XL they are compressing the file, so it is not RAW.JPEG-XL is lossless compression.

Are you unaware that most DNG files are compressed using Lossless JPEG? Including ones that are storing raw sensor data rather than debayered data like ProRaw?
I thought the point was more that although everyone in the building were wealthy, some were more wealthy than others, a comment on the human nature of letting even the most miniscule differences take on adversarial meaning when isolated.
Verizon bets on fiber's staying power as it acquires Frontier for $20B
I think you missed my point entirely.

I made my point in the first comment I made on this thread. Whatever it is, it is lacking something for human brains to grasp it.

My point is that people are doing it wrong because the names don't help. It was called _Smalltalk_, wasn't it? Like a casual friendly conversation. These more technical descriptions are behind the theory of it, not what is actually supposed to look like when applied.

I don't need to know that doors have hinges or the complex manufacturing of locks to call a door a door. When I open a lock, I don't need to call it a "mechanical system of pins and springs" or anything else.
Without components, I think Tailwind would drive me bonkers.
Why does anyone still use Facebook?
Also, their meaning gets lost over time.

That's why it's not recommended to use them in prose. But they get buried (!) anyway.
The data on extreme human ageing is rotten from the inside out
Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Words (2022)
Lossless compression is not about importance of data. Lossless is lossless, if the result of a roundtrip is not EXACTLY IDENTICAL then it is by definition not lossless but lossy.

Maybe you're confusing with "visually lossless" compression, which is a rather confusing euphemism for "lossy at sufficiently high quality".

JPEG XL can do both lossless and lossy. Lossless JPEG XL, like any other lossless image format, stores sample values exactly without losing anything. That is why it is called "lossless" — there is no loss whatsoever.
I tried again, and now it's working - and yes it is reasonably fast but i wonder once you start adding vision it will likely increase your response time, to the point that you may need to consider a temporary blur until the content is vetted.

Anyways good work on the tool, it has potential even at just blocking inline ads and spam.
Right…and 3 years prison for that. The gap got pretty narrower. I think half of the gaming communities should be put in jail under this law.

Saying a trans women is a boy is also gender hatred with possible catastrophic harm (as we know the suicide rate is pretty high on trans people). To be honest I would not be surprised at all to see people in jail for what JK Rowling said.
Thanks but I'm not really asking for advice. I'm uninterested in changing how I write correct, often POSIX-compliant shell scripts because of a linter that has an inferior understanding of the language. I'm also not a fan of this kind of dogmatic application of tools. Shellcheck can be useful sure, but my point is that, at least for me, the juice is often not worth the squeeze. I'm aware of how to disable rules. I often find the whole endeavor to be a waste of time.

If that doesn't track with you, that's cool, I'm happy for you.
Rejecting cookies now costs money. Is this even legal? [video]
That is being done too. Teenagers showing vulnerabilities in school systems have been prosecuted in Sweden... Needless to say, they didn't get much help with looking for holes after that so who knows how many security holes they still have.
We don't need people to make tools that go in the opposite direction. Politics is everywhere on the internet. No one needs a tool to find political opinions online any more than one needs a tool to find cockroaches in a sewer.
Insurers often require to have Endpoint Detection and Response for all the devices, from a third-party. In-house often won't cut it, even if it makes more practical sense.
That wasn’t OpenAI making those claims, it was Microsoft Azure.
> Storing it isn't an option.

Full sized cameras do use a buffer to deal with burst activity, take series if shots - process - save to slower storage. Also, modern cameras start switching to CFexpress/SDExpress (which are NVMe)

> Version 8.0 was announced on 19 May 2020, with support for two PCIe lanes with an additional row of contacts and PCIe 4.0 transfer rates, for a maximum bandwidth of 3,938 MB/s
I like how you used an analogy of a scale model to explain your understanding of why analogies are useful in communication
This is great to hear. I'm sure you're saving a lot of money. Do you think this is a trend that may happen more in the future. Because I wonder if cloud service providers can keep in increasing prices yet hardware is becoming more powerful yet you still need a large workforce to maintain cloud services.
Icon (real creators, AI ads) is hiring founding engineers (NYC)
I don’t think you understood my comment at all, the point of which was to create tools that help people understand each other better.
If it's a standard you should be able to able to point people to the standard specification document/laws or etc.

Else it's just a habit some people have. (and potentially a lazy and problematic one.)
Are you implying that Apple+ is a risky business for people who own Apple devices? If so, I'll stay away from it.
PHP docs are an underrated gem. They get several things right:

1. Individual pages for each function.

2. Clear examples for common usecases.

3. Explicit documentation for input and return types.

4. The quick search is amazing - it prioritizes library reference over other pages.

5. Clean and useful references to related methods.

The user submitted notes were a big positive a decade ago - they highlighted common gotchas, workarounds, and surprising alternatives, but have gotten dated over time (kinda like SO answers). But the voting mechanism attempts to keep them in check.

Compare https://www.php.net/manual/en/function.str-contains.php to the tiny one paragram you get at https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#str.find (which then redirects most users to a far more confusing explanation about the in operator https://docs.python.org/3/reference/expressions.html#members...
Oh wow, that is a pretty huge gap. I went around the world by train, and tried to get as close as reasonably possible: https://reustle.org/rtw

That said, border crossings and geopolitical situations are ever changing, and since she was timed, I can see the complexity.
You should still slap the code on github with a disclaimer that it's not stable/fully featured.
How could someone write a post like this and leave off the great book “Metaphors We Live By” by Lakoff and Johnson?

Is particularly found the part about how metaphors “hide and highlight” information. In other words the metaphor we use necessitates how we think. We often frame arguments using the metaphor of war and that frames how we think. The other party is an enemy that must be defeated, its bloody, and there is a loser. However we could frame it as a dance, in which case they are a partner, and for the outcome to succeed they must move together in harmony.

Lakoff has written other fascinating books like how metaphors are used in politics as well as math (“Where Mathematics Comes From”).
Can add it to bash?
Clearly, this is not for you.

I work in video games, most games use Unreal Engine, most existing toolsets and dependencies are built on C/C++, I have 17 years professional experience and nearly 30 years including hobbyist experience in C++. I often think I'd start new projects in Rust, but the last two large personal projects I started in C++, and one of them has been deployed in iOS, Android, Windows, Linux, Mac, WASM and RPi environments without much trouble. I haven't regretted that choice, even though I do really like Rust. In my contracting work, Rust just isn't an option. In my personal work, Rust is an option but since C++ has been getting better, I see less and less reason to use Rust.

But, you, please keep using Rust. It's a great language and I hope it someday eclipses C++. C++ was never designed as a cohesive language (Bjarne said exactly this in a talk I attended), it was designed as a grab bag of ideas, and I believe much of what's bad about C++ stems from that philosophy. Rust is built from the ground up with good ideas. But there's nothing wrong with improving C++ for those of us who it's really the best or only option.

EDIT: To be clear on this particular article, I agree it's not a great direction. But "just use Rust" is not helpful, and you may not have the problem this is trying to solve.
QED :-(
They don't understand basic math or basic logic, so I don't think they understand grammar either.

They do understand/know the most likely words to follow on from a given word, which makes them very good at constructing convincing, plausible sentences in a given language - those sentences may well be gibberish or provably incorrect though - usually not because again most sentences in the dataset make some sort of sense, but sometimes the facade slips and it is apparent the GAI has no understanding and no theory of mind or even a basic model of relations between concepts (mother/father/son).

It is actually remarkable how like human writing their output is given how it is done, but there is no model of the world which backs their generated text which is a fatal flaw - as this example demonstrates.
Even in the worst situation, like losing a loved one, I believe a smile can only do you good.
shellcheck is an option for helping you creat a good user experience by guessing against common errors we all make (out of a mix of laziness, bad assumptions, being in a rush, or just only thinking about the happy paths), but it isn't directly creating a great user experience and there are other methods to achieve the same thing.
This is pointless for corporations with 40 years of code in production.

Changing all those 40 years worth of code to the safe subset is equivalent to a total rewrite. Especially since usually the really old parts of the code have never been touched or modernized, so are usually C-like and therefore very far away from the safe subset.

One might as well rewrite it in something properly memory-safe.
> The volume is small

That is changing with the drone warfare becoming large part of the future wars. US military (and pretty much everyone else) will make drones major focus of advancement and there is definitely lot of money to be made by supplying chips for those.
The Department of Everything – Dispatches from the telephone reference desk
"Cut bait" isn't really a metaphor by this time; it's more an idiom that is based on a metaphor. It comes from "fish or cut bait", that is, either do one thing or the other. It means to stop being indecisive, to come to the point.
The issue is neither corporate tax nor globalization, but the difference between corporate tax rates, which provides an incentive in the first place to shuffle profits offshore.

A solution could be to tax offshore expenses with the difference in tax rates, i.e., min(0, corporate tax rate -destination company's corporate tax rate)%. That would eliminate the advantage of lower tax rates at the destination.

Another way would be to allow deducting only min(100, 100 - corporate tax rate + destination company's corporate tax rate)% of the offshore expenses. That still provides benefits for shuffling profits offshore, but the origin location gets some of it.
I don't know either, but it seems like approximately 100% of the reason game studios opt not to self-publish in this day and age is that lift. Annapurna's name alone carried a lot of clout.

(Side note: continue to be disappointed that they didn't brand themselves as "Annapurrna" on the Stray opening screen.)
Metaphors or analogies not exactly fitting the pattern of facts under discussion is not a problem.

It provides a neutral framework to compare and contrast. How a metaphor or analogy breaks down under scrutiny refines the thought and provides a new opportunity for metaphors or analogies.
Agreed. As a data point, i'm not disgruntled (i'm quoted in this article).

Mostly disappointed.
If a bit of fair criticism can bring down whole company, they are already gone. Unfair criticism can be easily debunked and any rational person will ignore it.

Market needs as much competition as possible since everybody else benefits from that, but it needs to have some solid foundations, not just wishful thinking or protectionism. if there will be a market hole, others will fill in. If you can't trust ie British or other western chips, why should rest of the world (aka 95% of mankind) trust US ones.
ARM64’s equivalent (NEON) only has 128 bit registers, so the gains of using SIMD are not as massive as on x86-64.

Edit: turns out there’s nowadays something called SVE that provides wider registers: https://developer.arm.com/Architectures/Scalable%20Vector%20...
Ask HN: What shall we call our niche tech consulting initiative?
problems we're trying to solve:
1. to provide data-driven, research-led insights on the biggest issues facing the C-suite.
2. to handhold them in getting enabled, rather disrupted by rapidly evolving technology.
That's an odd way to respond to someone who's trying to be helpful.

I find that there's a lot of good information in the comments on HackerNews, so sometimes advice and recommendations aren't just designed for the parent comment.

Your reply adds nothing of value and comes across as being rude - you could have simply ignored my comment if you found it of no value to you.
I wonder how many of those were going to a strip club on a friends drag do
To be fair, neither are C preprocessor macros. They're instead token substitutions. It's not that much better, but they're not literally text substitution. They're at least more clever than just that.

They're also of course surprisingly powerful, at the expense of being very cludgy.