skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's a cultural thing, I know of one Russian guy recently who went for an interview for a principal dev in a FAANG company, and didn't get the role because he was too serious, no smiles, no little ice-breaking smirks, no chortles - but a deadpan response to each interview question. Sometimes, it does matter how you appear to be saying something as well as what you say.
What normally happens is they will store a bunch of chips for the future and then shut the line down, when they need more they'd have to use a newer chip in it's place.
http://archive.today/hmqH0
> why instead of attempting to medicate our way out of the problem we don't try to attack the actual cause

Have you noticed that every time this discussion comes up in this forum, simple personal intervention is glossed over as a solution?
Causes for obesity, for HN users, are:

- The Environment
- The Lack of Walkable Cities
- The Policymakers™
- Too Many Cars
- The Government Lobbied By Food Corps
et cetera.

While none of the above has directly put calories into a person's mouth, and the only responsibility is on the mouth owner, we sometimes forget that the simple solution to the obesity crisis is: caloric restriction. This solution however has a major drawback: it requires being slightly uncomfortable for a tiny amount of time, which is unacceptable to most. So, enter the Magic Pill: No effort is required whatsoever, and we can keep on blaming external factors for what enters our mouth.
This isn’t a resignation letter, it’s a job application for a job he hasn’t been offered yet.
Absolute nonsense, you would use a tablespoon for a criminal purpose if you wanted to.
Reminds me of how Google's AlphaGo learned to play the best Go that was ever seen. And this somewhat seems a generalization of that.
It would, but lisp has prefix operators, so you wouldn’t have to worry about it getting confused.
I love the idea of using an URL as the bank statement!
FYI They load fine for me.
Kinda weird take on this. I mean, none of this is a secret. The fact that we know about it precludes this.

Not to mention they did post court documents on twitter and tagged musk himself

https://twitter.com/STF_oficial/status/1828932387117392265
Everything is already packetized and queued before transmitting. It seems that there are existing timing synchronization frames[1] in 5G transmissions at present. It would only require adding additional metadata to make those useful for positioning and timing distribution.

So, it might only be a few dozen packets/second in the worst case, for cell phone sites, etc.

As far as consumer equipment, like WiFi routers, etc... those are unlicensed, and wouldn't be part of this proposed use. (Though I suppose someone could figure out how to do it with WiFi, etc)

[1] https://howltestuffworks.blogspot.com/2019/10/5g-nr-synchron...
Companies believe GDPR doesn't apply to their human resources.
That seems a tad alternative history.

Regular old throwable fire bombs | lanterns | incendiary devices | oil filled clay pots with a wick, etc. work just fine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_thermal_weapons
Replace obesity with smoking as a simple exercise to understand how absurd these takes sound.

"It's not that I don't want to stop smoking, but the cigarette companies put chemicals in that keep me addicted"

"I live in an environment that pushes me to smoke"

"I wish the policymakers would stop me from smoking"

"I smoke because my genes tell me so"
Don't downvote this, this is the sad truth.
> t’s my biology. Other people have different biologies that will save calories irrespective of the source and use

There is zero scientific evidence about this.
Every company, car or otherwise, has security grossly inadequate for the current and especially the near future threat landscape. Everybody knows everything is easily hacked and companies people tout as exemplars like Apple and Microsoft just keep piling on the abject failures to prove the common wisdom true like it is going out of style. Decades of claimed success followed shortly after by failure after failure should really pound in the lesson: "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me ten thousand times, shame on me."

You need systems secure against teams commercially motivated attackers with 10 M$+ budgets and tens of full-time professionals working for years. Nobody in commercial IT would even dare to claim they could stop such attacks even though they are regular occurrences these days. If they do not even dare to say they can do it, why on Earth would anybody believe those vendors have, what, accidentally made things better than they think?

Ranking companies by security is like ranking the relative resistance of individual sheets of toilet paper to bullets. Sure, maybe the single ply toilet paper is not as good as the two ply, but neither of them provide objectively useful degrees of protection. And that is just talking about the bare minimum to protect against current threats.

If you can hack every Honda at rush hour to turn off the brakes, slam the accelerator, and drive slightly into oncoming traffic how many people do you think would die in the next minute before anything can be done or people informed to stop driving their cars? 1K? 10K? 100K? 1M? Does Honda survive killing more people than died in most wars? If a criminal organization demonstrates they can and will do it, how much would Honda pay in extortion to avoid being put out of existence and their executives jailed? How much security is adequate to avoid the deaths of thousands to millions? Certainly orders of magnitude more than the 10 M$ attacks that steam roll the "best commercial IT security" available today. Any reasonable number is vastly in excess of what these companies can secure today.

20 years ago, the hackers were 18 year olds demanding 300 dollars from grandmas. 10 years ago, the hackers were 28 year olds founding businesses demanding 10 thousand dollars from small businesses. Now they are 38 year olds managing teams demanding millions from billion dollar companies. Soon we will see them demanding billions if the trends continue for 5-10 more years. The software security doomsayers were right, just early. Even Mark Zuckerberg took a decade with huge piles of VC funds to get to a multi-billion dollar valuation; you have to forgive the hacking teenagers who had to bootstrap their criminal enterprises for taking so long.
They did in the past and the only thing people did was to port MAME and other emulators, or copies from old 8 and 16 bit days.

That is why we cannot have nice things.
That's what happens when you refuse to pay fines. Try not paying the IRS see what happens.
Most people don't even really know about the agile manifesto, but it is definitely a good manifesto and I second it.
Interesting, so you literally >focus< on the executive parts of your brain in order to focus.
Linux: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/microsof...

macOS: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/microsof...

It does iOS and Android too.

Again, if you're an organisation big enough to care about single-pane-of-glass-monitoring you probably already have access to this via the Microsoft 365 license tier you're on.
Pretty sure it applies to Common Lisp itself too.
Reminds me of the old “Please drink verification can to continue” meme https://imgur.com/dgGvgKF
The S in IoT is for Security; the P is for Privacy.
> We can debate principles and even the legality of these actions. But they weren't done in secret.

They were literally in secret - as in, the orders tell Twitter to comply and to do so in secret. See the actual order for yourself:

https://x.com/AlexandreFiles/status/1829979981130416479

> Would this also ban spam filters? Fraud convictions? If not then there are obviously caveats to when and how one can censor.

It would ban a government spam filter yes. I am not sure how fraud matters here, but I am guessing you’re saying that speech that constitutes fraud can be censored. But this is a lot more basic - the banning of currently sitting elected officials from social media.

> Also, why isn’t Article 220 ¶ 5 the relevant one [1]? Article 5 has 74 sections. Genuine question, I have no knowledge of Brazilian law.

Brazil’s constitution isn’t as well written as some other countries like the US. It is really long and there are many redundant and conflicting sections. Article 220 is in Title 8 (social order). Article 5 is in Title 2 (fundamental rights) and is more important. In article 5, look at 9 or 37 as examples that the actions of Alexandre de Moraes violates.
Ok but not a company as reputable as Apple, yes?

Apple historically used to have a deservedly good reputation for this. I was quite shocked at this story.
We did upgrades periodically, each time a conscious choice after reviewing the release notes of the dependency. Occasionally a script would need to be updated, but that was it.
Forward/backward in which dimension? There's at least three or four to sort out.
Is it no plan or no-plan?

you are confusing others like me.
Meditation is potent and should be treated as such. The good and the bad, much like any intense experience in life. Something to be especially aware of if you're interested in more than just dipping your toes in there. So, not talking about the basic ten minute guided mindfulness meditation.

The meditation community (in the west) has a very weird relationship with the negative side-effects. We also have a poor structure to support any of the weirder effects, without just making the recipient of those just feel way more weird and/or crazy. Which is the result of it being uprooted from an entirely separate framework and brought over, sometimes without much care.

In more concrete terms, people have had bad psychotic breaks during/after meditation retreats, or just as a result of going in too deep, etc. You can read more if you are interested:

https://harpers.org/archive/2021/04/lost-in-thought-psycholo...

https://vivo.brown.edu/display/wbritton

This comes as a shock to some people, even if it's obvious that other age old traditions - such as consuming Ayahuasca - should be treated with the utmost respect when it comes to the good and the bad.
Native English speaker here. Aren't they roughly identical, other than the passive voice?
How China has 'throttled' its private sector
Isn't this what a surge protector is for?
Not sure, but definitely more enterprisey than "release a patch to the entire world at once before running it on a single machine in-house".
What you linked isn’t the censorship order but a subsequent public order to X after X went public with its non compliance and complaints. Here’s an example censorship order to X that literally instructs them to perform the censorship in secret - this is the official Twitter account where they’re exposing the censorship scheme they were subject to from this one judge:

https://x.com/AlexandreFiles/status/1829979981130416479
None of the issues I mentioned where discovered via API. The flash wear issue was discovered by bricked cars. Security researchers are pretty good at publishing about remote unlock mechanisms for all manufacturers, though Tesla's bounty program has helped. The UDS implementation issues are non user facing and were discovered by reverse engineering. Ford, as an interesting point of comparison, published a competent (if incomplete) open source UDS server.
Interference Theory of Forgetting
The brotherhood of nations? (No idea about the less visible class of std issue equipment)

EDIT:
Hoist by the colors
https://youtu.be/x9oN_zk_WSk

EDIT 2:
https://youtu.be/XleUs-neDR8

(Feel free to add lyrics))
It's always fascinating to see the working assumption that women are somehow indifferent to these issues. As though being a sex worker is fine as a man.
It can record some telemetry to help you understand why it's slow: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/troubles...
Y Combinator expanding to four cohorts a year in 2025
Seems like that facility they were supposed to build in Germany is going to be built in Poland.
Probably there should be an independent body that oversees postmortems on tech issues, with the ability to suggest changes. This is what airlines face during crash investigations and often new rules are put in place (e.g., don’t let the shift manager self-certify his own work in the incident where the pilot’s window popped off). How this would look like with software companies, and what the bar is for being subject to this rigor I don’t know (I suspect not for a Candy Crush outage though).

In general, the biggest problem I see with late stage capitalism, and a lack of accountability in general, is that given the right incentives people will “fuck things up” faster than you can stop them. For example, say CrowdStrike was skirting QA - what’s my incentive as an individual employee versus the incentive of an executive at the company? If the exec can’t tell the difference between good QA and bad QA, but can visually see the accounting numbers go up when QA is underfunded, he’s going to optimize for stock price. And as an IC there’s not much you can do unless you’re willing to fight the good fight day in and day out. But when management repeatedly communicates they do not reward that behavior, and indeed may not care at all about software quality over a 5 year time horizon, what do you do? The key lies in finding ways to convince executives or short of that holding them to account like you say.
ULIDs are time ordered and CUID2s are random. So your decision should really be based on whether you want ordered IDs are not. Ordering is useful for transactional entities because you tend to operate on recent entities much more than older ones and things like partitioning, indexing become easier, whereas for non-transactional long lived entities, it might not matter much. Some applications don't like to leak time information through their IDs so they choose random IDs.

There is also UUIDv7 now which is similar to ULID but UUID compatible and might be a more ubiquitous standard going forward.
Rust isn't even available on Android NDK, even though is now used on Android.

Same applies to Rust on Windows, and whatever Microsoft is doing, windows-rs isn't that great, and after what the team did with C++/WinRT I don't have high expectations.

So consoles have even less reasons to support Rust.
IPython includes a whole lot of extra magic of various kinds, compared to the built-in Python console.
This is amazing!! I was looking for a reliable pdf to markdown conversion tool. Thanks for sharing this.
The de minimas threshold allows for lots of things that would otherwise be difficult to document or not worth the effort, from grandma mailing a sweater for Christmas to getting a replacement part shipped directly.
Ok I guess, but the survival of Intel Foundry still depends on whether their node process is competitive with TSMC. Do we know the progress on "5 nodes in 4 years" plan, is it being executed well?
They don't tell you why, so it's strange to say this is the reason. At Google the interviewers write up the discussion, questions and answers, and a separate committee decides based on the feedback from all the interviewers. There is no scoring for pun quality sadly.
Yes, because in point of fact this company is the best at what it does — preventing security breaches. The outage — disruptive as it was — was not a breach. This elemental fact is lost amidst all the knee jerk HN hate, but goes a long way toward explaining why the stock only took a modest hit.
Intel hasn't been nimble for a while. It's a huge organisation. Makes sense to attach themselves to the military, both sides need a stable, reliable partner for a long-term relationship.
What about temperature?

One of the issues with Flair is the loss of heat when the water is poured, which is why it is recommended to heat the unit also.
Filters won't help against prolonged periods of higher/lower voltages though.
It's identical. The difference is where you stand on the reason.

Someone in this thread has pointed out that the it's only the actions considered unacceptable that have changed
LSD Game and Music Machine
>we'll look into providing torrent files for releases

It is sort of interesting we are back to torrenting. Especially when bandwidth outside of the cloud are relatively cheap. I wonder how many TB they are using per month.
How did you manage to go back to normalcy?
That is not based in reality at all though.
>This announcment almost let's you image using Haiko as a daily driver for development.

Having tried Beta5, I am convinced I could do just that.

It has got working ports for e.g. modern webbrowser, multiple IDEs, openssh, libreoffice, caligra, gimp, inkscape, krita, wine.
My home NAS is about 200TB, runs 24/7, is very loud and power inefficient, does a full scrub every Sunday, and also hasn’t had any drive failures. It’s only been 4 or 5 years, however.
You wouldn't see it on the schematics, it's in the driver.
You’re mixing different unrelated issues and making this about Musk, which I don’t think is on topic. I’ll just say that Brazil has local laws that make secret censorship orders unconstitutional. Twitter complies with government orders to censor if it is legal, for example in Australia. But it isn’t legal in Brazil. Elsewhere they’ve even fought such orders - for example shortly after Musk acquired Twitter they had a legal battle with the government of India, which they lost and ended up complying, in part because laws were passed that made those censorship orders legal. No law has been passed in Brazil to give any court the power that Moraes assumed.
Basically my understanding is that now the seller must do the tolls/taxes before sending the package. Really hits small time sellers in places like UK, but Ali and Temu and so on are so big they can just implement it, pay taxes and still be cheaper than adding local middlemen in the mix.
>Python problematically decides that returns diminish after the first --- “first” according to developers, that is --- possibility in all cases

Eh, that feels pretty arbitrary to me. `quit()` and `exit()` both work, and looking at other languages, `exit()` should almost certainly be your first choice

C: exit(int)
Java: System.exit(int)
SBCL: (quit)/(exit)
C#: Environment.Exit(int)
PHP: exit(int)/exit(string)
Rust: std::process::exit(int)

Having `exit` or `quit` without the parens work might accommodate some people whose first choice isn't to call a function (I guess because they're thinking of the REPL as a shell?), but surely if you're going that far `bye` is a reasonable and practical choice. ftp/sftp use it to this day. At some point you make a cutoff, and where you do is pretty arbitrary. You can like that ruby is twice as lenient as python, but I think it's a stretch to say that python using the single most common function call and a very common alias is "problematic" or even surprising. IMO, python's behavior is less surprising because I don't expect `exit` to be a special command that executes inside the REPL. I expect `exit()` because that's what other programing languages do. And python famously ditched the inconsistent `print "Foo"` syntax in favor of `print("Foo")` in python3 exactly because inconsistency in what was and wasn't a function call was surprising.
All the Light We Can See
Why do people who should know better still use EST during the summer. It's EDT until November, please.

And also, let's please get RID OF DST. It's a mistake that has gone on too long.
Thanks for sharing this advice.

Yes, complete understanding of where things stand at any given time improves our odds of success even when it seems difficult.
Yes. In most cases, assuming you live in a 220V country, a surge protector will absorb the upwards spike, and the voltage range (a universal PSU can go as low as 107V) will handle the brownout voltage dip.
Pretty sure surge protectors are less effective against dips than they are spikes
Interesting. But why store the somewhat unwieldy wafer instead the packaged chip? I’d imagine that doesn’t add much cost but makes storage significantly simpler.
this could be LLM bots parroting opinions these days.
The feature of making people smile for ID verification (as written in the article) is rather idiotic. I could smile but why force myself to do so? I hate smiling when it's not genuine. ID verification is a confrontation and even though necessary, rather insulting also. These modern technological systems are becoming exceptionally irritating.
He says in the article. 'Set +e' prevents any error in a fork blitzing the whole script.
Maybe it’s more obvious they didn’t unblock X, only their assets
It just doesn’t make sense to do it ahead of time in such situations. Email client could simply ask if I trust the email before processing the attachment (and some clients do that). Automated pre-processing of attachments is a general risk that doesn’t apply only to calendar.
> All the market correctly predicted is that the market would continue to incorrectly predict their value.

I don’t understand why so many don’t get this, especially after crypto currencies became a thing. The token can be DOGE or TSLA, the mechanism is the same, only marketing and PR content change, reality doesn’t matter. In fact Musk already said Tesla is not a car company anymore. Crypto opened the eyes of a lot of smart CEOs, and not in a good way, and investors look away as long as the dance continue.
Oh well i can see it on twitter! Still not secret!
Luckily Apple is not Google, and you can call their support and they can tell you what the problem is and likely fix it.
It’s interesting to think about what the right verb is.

I’d probably say Meta trained their models using all self-hosted, public AU citizen’s data.

But it doesn’t really sound as scary as “scraped” to non-technical users.
They have IT policies to make sure it largely does not apply. Even in our policy officially any personal use is forbidden. Funnily there is also agreement with our employee board, that any personal use will not be sanctioned. So guess what happens. This done to circumvent not only GPR but also TTDSG in germany (which is harsher on 'spying' as it applies to telecoms. For any 'officially' gathered personal information though typical very specific agreements with our employee board exist though (reporting of illness, etc). Wonder how such information which is also sensitive in a workplace is handled. Also I see those systems used in hospitals etc, if other peoples data is pumped through this systems GDPR definitively applies and auditors may find it (I only know such auditing in finance though). In the future NIS2 will also apply so exactly the people that use such systems will be put under additional scrutiny. Hope this triggers also some auditing of the systems used and not just the use of more of such systems.
No, see, they're leveling the playing field by storing all secrets they find on macs in plaintext
Electric DeLorean DMC-12 Conversion Kit
That seige is listed in every major work of antiquity as being months, not years.
Could be.

People miss the fact the judge gave orders to suppress his personal misdeeds and that the orders to Twitter asked them to take down accounts and posts without revealing it was a judicial order. Or even the reason for the ban.

Imagine getting banned from social media, the operator tells you it's for a TOS violation or tells you nothing. You don't realize it's from a court. That's what's this is about.
We've been using a multi-TB PostgreSQL database on ZFS for quite a few years in production and have encountered zero problems so far, including no bit flips. In case anyone is interested, our experience is documented here:

https://lackofimagination.org/2022/04/our-experience-with-po...
I’ve learned more about CSS from using Tailwind than I ever did using CSS
Right, I also thought that was a strange take.
The Palace Coup at the Magic Kingdom
> The waitress told us he drew sketches of the faculty he did not care to eat with. She said they all had long noses.

I’m trying to understand this comment. I can’t tell if this is somehow a vague hint of an anti-Semitic attitude? It’s a weird thing to say or write in modern times if not.