skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Found the answer in a different post [1]. The hypervisor and virtual machines are single-core only. The talk also indicates that all I/O operations need to be manually rewritten to use the instrumented mechanism, so it demands a highly paravirtualized guest OS. Logically, that means there are probably no cross-VM shared memory interfaces either. So, no shared memory and thus no need to deal with shared memory non-determinism.

This is just a standard replay engine from what I can tell.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41501577
I'm not Irish and I'm a lazy reader at this time so I won't search who's right, but the comment you are answering to was way more convincing than yours.
A bloom filter will have the same weaknesses of needing to do a hash. For static filters like this though where you have the set of strings to check against known up front, something like a binary fuse filter could work really well as it's significantly faster than bloom filters when you don't need online construction (you still need to do a hash of course but the evaluation against std::HashMap is flawed since it uses SipHash instead of modern constructions like xxh3 or gxhash).
What was the model? I recently encountered something similar with a GE over-the-counter microwave. One day it stayed on after opening the door. I replaced the control module and the board in it looks exactly like the one in the OP photo (Midea with all of the same components), which leads me to think the fault is the same as the one described in the post.
Yeah this blog is a find. Welcome to the 21st.
AKA fake and gay
If I pull up behind a modern pickup at a stoplight my car is completely occluded. If I pull up to the passenger's side of a modern pickup the driver has no idea: they cannot see down far enough from the driver's seat to know that there's another vehicle next to them. It's remarkable.

I knew things were off the rails when I parked my beater 2nd-gen Ranger next to a then-new F-250 and couldn't see the top of the Ranger's cab when looking through the F-250's windows.
No US drone capability in the sub-$1000 market, AFAIK. Which basically means consumer is dead. There are a few manufacturers for pro/semi-pro (Skydio comes to mind), but they are sure expensive.

My guess is that we struggle with the manufacturing part. It's hard to be in any way competitive with somebody who's got a much bigger scale, in a market that's got razor-thin margins.

It doesn't help that GoPro has always struggled with quality issues, and for their drones that meant they just kept falling out of the sky - not a great way to win the market. And Snapchat's Pixy was a fire hazard, with a recall of every single one of them.

But that also means we'll continue to fall behind on non-consumer applications, because there are no cheap platforms to experiment on. (Sure, General Atomics will continue to build, but rapid innovation is hard)

On the upside, there's no YC company aiming for that platform play, so get your pitch decks in while it's hot ;) Good luck, though. Manufacturing is hard, consumer manufacturing harder, making flying things gets you a fun regulatory environment. If I were to pitch, I'd probably talk to drone-related startups, figure out what their current platform is, what their needs are, what demand is, and if it makes financial sense to offer a slightly cheaper platform in that space first.
I think there's a deeper and more important subtlety here: there's a sort of moral obligation not to break a strike, but except in some specific circumstances, there really isn't an obligation to support a boycott, any more than there's an obligation to put a pro-labor bumper sticker on your car. Breaking a streak and ignoring a boycott are not equally weighted.

(My kid brother is a labor person, so really I'm just venting some stuff here to keep it from coming up at Thanksgiving).
No - I have only been trialling them for about 2 weeks after having substantial hearing loss on one side for 20+ years.

Thanks for your insight though - I was told "a couple of days" to get used to them would be enough.
Andrej Karpathy has a youtube playlist:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAqhIrjkxbuWI23v9cThs...

He is building new learning materials under his new company "Eureka Labs":

https://eurekalabs.ai

Sebastian Raschka's book "Build a Large Language Model (From Scratch) just released:

https://www.manning.com/books/build-a-large-language-model-f...

All of these resources are excellent.
I think what you mean to say is that regulations GROW over time.

If you only add regulations but never remove them, eventually you end up with a society where most things are illegal and the only people who can get anything done are wealthy enough to afford to deal with years-long bureaucratic processes.
Yea, because C++ world is known for having one, sane thing instead of 10 inconsistent.
Yeah, because the country is so heterogeneous, this push has to come from major metros charging people for doing truck things. What makes sense in a dense city doesn't really apply in bumfuck nowhere which is 99% of the country. You can see in San Francisco when a new wave of migration occurs because suddenly the streets are littered with Lariats and Raptors.
They also say with individual rays calculated at "double or even triple the speeds of PlayStation 5. “67 percent more compute units and 28 percent faster video RAM” and the images are with a PS5 @ 30FPS and a PS5 Pro at 60FPS.

So, it’s a different architecture not just a speed bump. That said, I agree in general it’s going to be worse than a 4070ti but every architecture has its quirks.
How reasonable is tuning automatic emergency braking to recognize pedestrians?

"Don't hit anything. At all. Ever." seems like a reasonable default prime directive for new vehicles (with obvious exceptions for police etc).
Related documentary that comes to mind: Digital Amnesia (2014) [1]

It broke my heart seeing those librarians in disbelief when their national library was sold off to the highest bidder. When they said "It seems our country does not value our own culture anymore".

Books lasted hundreds of years. Good luck trying to read a floppy from the 90s, or even DVDs that are already beyond their lifetime and are a very recent medium.

It gets worse when you read the fine print of the SSD specifications, wherein they state that an SSD may lose all its data after 2 weeks without power, and data retention rates are at less than 99%, meaning they will degrade after the first year of use. And don't get me started on SMR HDDs, I lost enough drives already :D

Humanity has a backup problem. We surely live in Orwellian times because of it.

[1] https://youtube.com/watch?v=NdZxI3nFVJs
curl – Download/Export Public Google Spreadsheet as TSV from Command Line
I don't think anybody is arguing for those Censored Eleven to be shown on TV. They're still out there for any adult who cares enough to find, I think that's enough.

For that matter, I wasn't even criticizing the OP document for missing those eleven. Given the time it was written it's quite possible the author didn't even have access to them. In any case, the omission of those few from what seems to be an otherwise comprehensive document is, I thought, notable.
share compensation doesn’t use cash
When it comes to exchangeable lens cameras (DSLRs/DSLMs), as you increase the number of pixels you very quickly reach a point where you're limited by the optical performance of the lens instead of the sensor. Lots of systems offer a choice between a 24MP and a high pixel count camera (e.g. Nikon Z6/Z7), and you'll find that the high pixel count sibling requires very good lenses to actually achieve a meaningful improvement over 24MP. For these cameras, common wisdom says to stay with 24MP apart from certain niche use cases.

In other words, I wouldn't expect a improvement in capturing actual 48MP pictures in phone cameras, apart perhaps from pixel binning to a smaller size and similar techniques.

Disclaimer: I haven't followed camera tech very closely recently, and I'm not an expert. Take my opinion with a grain of salt.
Whether or not the exit node operators retained logs is besides the point. These exit nodes are facilitating illegal activities, and it's trivial to prove. How do they not get arrested?

It sounds like Germany extends some sort of carrier protection to Tor exit node operators. E.g. if someone organizes a drug deal over the phone, Verizon is not liable. But Verizon does have to meet some minimum standards of records keeping and law enforcement assistance (wire tapping).
This is the problem with the definition. If the product is trurly open source, call it that. If its not, thats ok, but don't. Core has no real definition.

I definitely would never call GitLab Open Source. I can't comment as much on the others. Sidekiq is actually how I think the world should work: its open source, and then they sell Sidekiq Pro. One is Open Source, one isnt. The issue is most people don't operate that way.

GitLab Community Edition is Open Source, GitLab is not. Cal.com isn't open source, but is the Cal product? I'm not sure. Given I started Sentry I can at least use it as an analogy. Early days Sentry was open source, but getsentry.com was not (which was our billing infra). No one would have called Sentry Open Core, because no part of "Sentry" was closed source. That's not true for most Open Core.
No, you'd just be smearing the work at best. The expensive part is determining set containment not updating the data structure. It doesn't matter if you do it in a loop and update the data structure or do that check before writing.
Maybe they want to stay in news media. When I worked at The Atlantic, a lot of my coworkers were highly motivated by the subject matter of their work and perceived quality of their newsroom.
GhostBSD 24.07.1 Launches with Improved Performance and Stability
No automated way to do that, I'm afraid. That said, most of the Jet statement builder API maps directly to SQL keywords, so it's usually straightforward. Still, some specific things are pretty awkward (CTE's come to mind).
Fun fact, usc does not apply to germany where the article is about.

But regardless, in both systems i am very certain your purpose ("intent") matters a lot. (Details depend on the specific crime in question)
Genuinely interested. What problems did you have dealing with the standard reconciliation mechanism provided by ArgoCD and by k8s itself. I understand the advantage of the operator approach, but it might be hard to show the state in ArgoCD and somewhat breaks the idea of gitops.

Can we benefit your project in a more limited but agentless way? Limiting the types and CRDs we allow in k8s makes operations better, especially with the aggressive upgrade cycle that k8s already imposes.
Lottery Simulator (2023)
I think recently I had to make my own because strtod was too large for my embedded system. I just wanted simple xx.yy type strings, so it was as easy as parsing 2 integers, convert, divide, add, done. I often wish these functions had more variants for stuff like that.
Co-founder here:

Great question! Yeah, the biggest difference is that DBOS doesn't require a centralized workflow server, but does all orchestration directly in your functions (through the decorators), storing your program's execution state in Postgres. Implications are:

1. Performance. A state transition in DBOS requires only a database write (~1 ms) whereas in Temporal it requires a roundtrip and dispatch from the workflow servers (tens of ms -- https://community.temporal.io/t/low-latency-stateless-workfl...).
2. Simplicity. All you need to run DBOS is Postgres. You can run locally or serverlessly deploy your app to our hosted cloud offering.
- " Fenceposts are literally < 2" thick! So the resolution must be on the order of 2cm."

That's not quite how it works. If you apply a Gaussian blur on the scale of 20 cm to a 2 cm imaged object, it will persist in some form, if the contrast ratio is very high. That doesn't mean you have 2 cm resolution. Spatial resolution is rather different: it asks something more like, can you distinguish *two* objects at a 2 cm separation distance? Can you distinguish the case there two such separated objects, from that where there is only one?

That's closer to what you need to answer the question "how small text can be read?"

(Some of the visible stars in the sky, by the way, are ridiculously small (angular size) compared to the human eye resolution—there's no contradiction there either! The angular diameter of (for instance) Rigel is smaller than 1/10,000th the resolution of a human eye!)
And it’s a happy coincidence that it comes right at the start of their latest and largest antitrust trial! Some contractor in charge of monitoring their mentions is pumping their fist rn at this repost, lol
Guess they want to avoid any political backlash that could arise from topics like that, which will happen inevitably.
Teslas Are Being Towed by Police to Collect On-Board Video
sharing the COSMIC desktop from (with?) the system_76 pop_os! guys is interesting. if a cross platform+ embedded gui kit comes out of this that'd be cool.
I’ve seen projects do the same, but also issue passkeys. That lets them seamlessly sign in across ecosystem devices.
As a eu citizen, what is the impact of this to me?
Will this money be used for us? Nope. Some club of politicians will have a nice bonus, FAANG will be more aggressive against the EU.
Look, if rules are broken ppl will have to be held responsible. But thats not entirey clear in this case.

Thanks again EU
Former OpenAI, Meta Staff to Testify on Capitol Hill
Google's fingers get burned whenever it lets its AI touch social topics.
https://archive.ph/ZypnQ#selection-297.7-297.59
Recent / related:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41418562 - Americans' love affair with big cars is killing them

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41461138 - What to do about America's killer cars

And see also AP's earlier reporting (yesterday): https://apnews.com/article/us-pedestrian-safety-rule-suvs-pi...
I wish everybody in this thread could have just said what their opinions were, instead of masking them behind increasingly leading and ridiculous rhetorical questions.

I agree with you the exploitation should not be measured by some absolute bar based on the expectations of some lost past era with bad labor laws.

But Star Trek hypotheticals could be the most productive perspective, could they?
Because all of those things impact battery life. You are trading improved performance and features for worse battery life. These are not unrelated.

My Swatch has a battery life that makes any Garmin on the market seem pathetic. Is it fair to compare the two on battery life?
It's not even a shift, it's the original meaning. There are/were physical picket lines that you would literally cross to enter a business.
Then, like gaming or Hollywood, their salaries will be lower.
Presumably, the tech workers at NYT have a better idea of if striking is a good idea, as they’re employed there and have better visibility into motives and margins
> All tax treaties and agreements between countries (including intra-EU) are bilateral country to country agreements.

That is completely wrong on multiple levels.

- You’re likely thinking of the double taxation treaties that follow the OECD model convention. These hardly get refreshed every 7 years. The German/Irish one is from 1962, the French/Irish one is from 1966, and the UK/Irish one from 1976.
- The OECD’s BEPS multilateral tax treaty has now 85 state parties, including Ireland
- There are other example of multilateral tax treaties, e.g. the Nordic countries have a multilateral double taxation treaty
- There’s plenty of EU legislation around taxation covering predominantly VAT and excise duties bit also such details as the tax treatment of moving personal property between member countries or how royalty payments between associated companies are treated
From the earnings call transcript:

Lawrence Joseph Ellison -- Chairman and Chief Technology Officer

This race goes on forever, to build a better and better neural network. And the
cost of that training gets to be astronomical. When I talk about building
gigawatt or multi-gigawatt data centers, I mean these AI models, these frontier
models are going to -- the entry price for a real frontier model from someone
who wants to compete in that area is around $100 billion. Let me repeat, around
$100 billion.

Let me say something that's going to sound really bizarre. Well, you'd probably
say, well, he says bizarre things all the time. So why is he announcing this
one? Let's be really bizarre. So we're in the middle of designing a data center
that's north of the gigawatt that has -- but we found the location and the
power place.

We've looked at it, they've already got building permits for three nuclear
reactors. These are the small modular nuclear reactors to power the data
center. This is how crazy it's getting. This is what's going on.

https://www.fool.com/earnings/call-transcripts/2024/09/09/or...
Was that one mandated by policy though? I don't think it was, it was something browsers wished websites would adopt, and since they didn't now we've got stupid web elements that are unnecessarily shoved in our faces. Meanwhile tracking people has probably gotten worse and worse over the years (for the consumer).

What I'm proposing is if we're going to legislate the web, make it smarter and intuitive. Unfortunately the people writing these laws rarely get feedback from people who actually build websites or care about end-users.
45^2 = 2025 => must be the sum of first 45 odds => 1 + 3 + ... + 87+ 89 = 2025

while its not pythagorean, 40^2 + 20^2 + 5^2 = 2025.

877 is another bullcrap that has shown up on a bunch of these tests. 877 is a prime, and four times 877 is 3508 = sum of all the divisors of 2025.

there's a bunch more i shared with them.
https://x.com/JasonAdamsWFTS/status/1833531361363464535

https://archive.today/yA6OG
>>high off the ground (needlessly most of the time) they are more susceptible to rollover.

Also the far greater mass of the vehicle requires far stronger A-, B- and C-pillars to not crush in a rollover

Forcing all vehicles onto a 30-50% weight loss diet would help every factor tremendously, including reduced braking distances and more nimble turning to reduce collisions in the first place, reduced impact when there are collisions, reduced road wear, reduced fuel/energy consumption, etc.. Everything gets better with lighter weight, but engineers/designers seem happy to blow right past any weight budget at the slightest excuse (if there even is a weight budget in the design brief). The sheer mass of vehicles these days, even so-called "sportscars" never ceases to amaze me, and when it gets to SUVs and trucks, it's just insane. The technology certainly exists to cut weights by close to half, to levels of 35 years ago, and improve safety and performance while doing so.
How would I integrate it into existing setup that uses tools like terraform, along with helm?

See, there's a bunch of stuff that I deploy using terraform (VPC, DNS, EKS) and a bunch of stuff that I deploy with FluxCD. But in between, there's some awkward stuff like the monitoring stack that requires cloudy things and Kube things, and they're tightly coupled.

Right now I end up going with terraform and the awful helm provider. Many of these helm charts have sub-charts, nested values etc, but thankfully the monitoring stack doesn't change that much. It's still not ideal but it works as a one-shot deployment that sets up buckets, policies, IAM roles for service accounts, more policies for the roles, and finally the helm charts with values from the outputs of those clouds resources.
Itar
And they’re protected by a union
Among the Moss Piglets: The First Image of a Tardigrade (1773)
Curious why attending in person or otherwise watching the game is not among the considerations.
> can use up a lot more memory and take longer to build

Does it support const construction so that you build it during compilation from a static set of strings?
Yes, we've had similar experiences and plan to address them to some extent. In certain cases, like with Facebook, it might not be straightforward, but we want to provide built-in alternatives e.g. analytics specifically tailored for e-commerce that cover ~80% of what you need, with the rest being a trade-off.

I also think Facebook, Google, Hotjar et al. will eventually get better with those scripts.
About (RSS) Feeds
If someone is willing to sell me titanium chopsticks for a reasonable price (and they are), then no, I’m not concerned that Grandma doesn’t get a new hip because Apple Watch used up all the titanium.
And where was this against the law?
The answer was no, probably not.

Beautiful story!
A a driver of a smaller car, this is great!

Oh, so instead of fixing the standards that caused the shift to large trucks and SUVs to begin with they are going to mandate more crash safety....

>The proposed rule would apply to passenger vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,000 pounds or less, including multipurpose passenger vehicles (trucks, SUVs, crossovers and vans).

>The proposed standard would establish test procedures simulating a head-to-hood impact and performance requirements to minimize the risk of head injury. NHTSA estimates the new standard would save 67 lives a year.

https://www.nhtsa.gov/press-releases/nhtsa-proposes-new-vehi...

Basically nothing.

How about making more rigorous standards for heavier vehicles and tighten the emission standards for the heavier vehicles as well?
It's not really ambiguous. When talking about Ireland in an economic sense, we generally refer to the Republic of Ireland. Geographically you would say the island of Ireland if you were to include Northern Ireland.
Regulators can't even keep doing what they're doing, because what they were doing was publishing rules to resolve ambiguities in legislation, and now the Court system has preempted that privilege. Loper-Bright has turned the existing body of regulations into a target-rich environment. Every agency rule can be challenged, possibly overturned, applying retroactively.

Libertarians may cheer at this, but not so fast. The edge cases and particulars of laws aren't abolished, they're just fuzzy. You can't be sure you're complying with the law, even if the regulatory body says you're in the clear. You're at the mercy of judges who know nothing about the field they're ruling over. The chaos of legal uncertainty will grind the permitting of new technologies to a halt, as the regulators wait for Congress or the Courts to clarify how old laws apply to new circumstances before issuing any licenses.

Remember Oracle v. Google? How octogenarian Justices struggled to understand what an API was, when they could barely open their email? Imagine that, applied to the entire US code.
It's not revering a person but a friendship. Anybody reading their code would know what the article is talking about. C++ is not the ideal language to make the hard thing seem easy but they did.
It's a result of roll over requirements in tandem with a complete lack of requirement around A-pillar visibility, yeah. It's not like a hard limit of materials science that A-pillars have to have poor visibility to be rollover safe.
It's perfectly fine to revere people and get inspired.
Jeff Dean, Dennis Ritchie, Isaac Newton, Claude Shannon, Stephen Wolfram and others are brilliant thinkers who have impacted the world.

In fact, the higher the IQ, the better you are able to discern true intellect vs loud mouths.

I for one revere Jeff Dean and I'm proud of it. It doesn't affect my life negatively in any way. In fact betting on people that I revere (Jobs, Musk, Zuck, Bezos, Buffett) have profited me immensely
That is the affordable answer.
Not complaining! It's wonderful that we are finally getting investments in a better environment. And ASML provides a big boost to the economy as well.

But a bus line that goes from the train station directly to one company, together with housing that will be filled with the expats from ASML is obviously an (indirect) company subsidy.