skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Ah so it was luck that so many exceptional people ended up at Google [Microsoft, Nvidia, Intel, Sun, AWS, Apple, et al] at a similar time.

As opposed to it being obvious that very interesting things, opportunities, were happening at those companies. With word spreading throughout the industry. Along with talent flight into said companies, so as to pursue said opportunities along with other talent. Employees in tech typically see these things happening, it's not a big secret.

You can in fact do a lot better than blind dart throwing.
ISPs cooperate with law enforcement. Most even have dedicated staff for that.

So there's no need to seize their equipment.
Single-semi-counter-anecdote: My son is colour blind, but he specifically picks out peas from any and all of his meals.

I mean, peas are green so they'd be more difficult to identify than other items, but he makes the effort every single time.
I scared myself with my microwave, a cheaper Samsung. Somehow it turned “itself” on when I opened the door once. I quickly slammed it shot and jumped back. Hopefully it’s this exact failure and the magnetron didn’t actually start.
This solution reminds me of an old blog post, where two members of the F# team at Microsoft battled back and forth on making the best solver for some word game. Cloudflare's solution here looks a lot like the second-to-last solution; the final post involved collapsing the tree nodes into a 2D array of u32s for maximum cache-hits. It was a really neat solution!

...and amazingly, it's still up from 2010: https://lorgonblog.wordpress.com/2010/02/21/dawg-gone/
I know that my dad had some from Dewalt 20 volt to same for several other brands that he likes,and I have utilized. Not sure if from the same company. I believe you can 3d print some on thingiverse.com from what i recall as well, and use a parts list supplied for the wiring.
Feel free to put my cremated remains in a Ralph's tin.

In fact, I demand that my cremated remains are receptacled into a Ralph's tin.
> you can ask me for that information and/or get a court order.

That’s what the article says the police are doing. They are asking the Tesla owner for footage, and if they can’t contact the owner, they are getting a court order (warrant) and towing the car to retrieve the data.
Woman drips with sweat from a bite of food due to rare nerve-wiring mix-up
Insane as in it works but the movement in the video is not anything like the instant pro gamer Elon made it out to be. It's amazing but it's diminished by over promising again. sic
ExpressJS 5.0
Thank you for the textbooks! I've started studying Molecular Biology of the Cell to prepare for undergrad, but this is the first time I've heard about the others.

Are there any other books you would recommend?
> If you standardized them, it'd be a race to the bottom and China would win.

I happen to be a manual razor shaver and I found your analogy to this field rather interesting. Safety razor is a standardized market where all blades will fit all razors, and yet

1. You don't see anyone selling their own proprietary blade size.
2. China doesn't actually win this market. A few well-known brands that I've used: Feather (Japanese), Merkur (German), Astra (Turkey) and now I'm trying some Indian blades.
I guess, but given this precedent, I doubt anywhere else in the EU is going to give a better deal, so all the companies where Ireland gave them illegal deals probably won't have any reason to move to Germany or Spain or Belgium. Ireland probably gets to keep their business and tax revenue going forward, as well as getting back taxes.
FWIW, power tools batterie are generally high amp rated and require a BMS that can support it. Not that you can't do it, but won't work with off the shelf 18650s.
I agree. Ultimately, while being able to actually physically hide behind a cabinet in SUPERHOT VR was a really cool experience, I have quite similar memories from playing regular SUPERHOT despite of me sitting comfortably in front of a flat screen at the time. I can also vividly remember book scenes despite of only ever seeing black text on some paper in front of my eyes. The brain is quite good at abstracting the medium away.
These make tools run, but they're dangerous because they break the safety battery safety features which are built into the tool. With the exceptions of Ryobi and Makita, most power tool battery safety features are built in to the tools, and they communicate to the battery. At minimum, they check a thermistor. More sophisticated schemes can query the battery for shutoff voltage and maximum current.
Hey there, and thanks for your feedback! You're spot on about needing a simple way to try out PixelBuddyAI. Because of the costs involved, I can only share some pre-generated samples right now. How about checking out my X post? You'll get to see the live image generation in action (Adding my my site soon): https://x.com/irua_dev/status/1833269843727950039. Plus, I'm just wrapping up a video that'll walk you through the whole training process.
On Ryobi 40v if you stick a resistor between the tx and ground I think (look it up on youtube) you can charge with a standard 10s li-ion charger or cc/cv source.
You have to effectively marry your power tool provider to get worthwhile economies of scale.

I wonder if there's a market for battery adapter-shims? (then they'd start doing HP-ink-level shenanigans, if they're not already).

Looks like CharlesW answered my question before I asked it:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41507481
No. It isn't. I strongly encourage you to engage in good faith. You can start by reading a very approachable lay summary of vehicles and the expectation of privacy. https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/amendment-04/16-vehic...

You can also read TFA: "have begun getting warrants for the footage captured by the vehicles"

It is tiresome beyond measure that every time a legal topic comes up, the peanut gallery has to chime in with your dishonest, narcissistic comments.

The law does not exist to enforce your personal policy preferences. It's fine to say that you dislike something, or that the law doesn't take into account changes in society and perhaps it should be changed. However, it is unacceptable behavior to presume that something isn't being done "lawfully" or that it isn't "proper" just because you don't like it. And it is a lie to compare this to warrantless searches of any sort.

HN is for intellectual curiosity. If you're not here to learn, perhaps you should consider using a different site.
The other thing that worries me here is the EU's seeming willingness to both not intervene quickly and not provide ways for companies to know for sure that they're on the right side of EU laws until they do or don't get sued.
While we're on the topic of jupyter enhancements, would really love to be able to pop a cell off the pending execution stack if I realized running it would be a mistake and still have time before it gets there.. :^)
I won't buy an Intel Lunar Lake-powered laptop
Designing Organisations That Work
Technically nothing, but legally it's just not allowed in the US (neither for FRS/GMRS, nor for ham radio operators, with very few exceptions).
It's also literally not the only one that got in trouble today. Google's deal with Ireland also got smacked down.
I think powershell is actually really well designed. Some of the syntax leaves a bit to be desired, but other than that I think it's really good. What do you think is poorly designed?
There are semistandard cylindrical Li-ion cells. Common sizes include 14500 (14x50mm; AA-size), 18650, and 21700. Many devices with built-in or proprietary batteries use these cells, but it seems like flashlights are the only category where they're usually removable and not housed in a proprietary case.

I've owned bluetooth speakers and handheld fans that run on a single 18650. For many other product categories, the reasons they don't are mostly counter to the interests of consumers, but market demand doesn't seem to be strong enough to change this.
I’m not sure why they added this feature. All Apple SoCs have far more energy efficient compute than the CPU. This would only make sense for really tiny models which need extremely quick forward pass. For such models the overhead of a GPU or Neural Engine kernel launch would be quite noticeable. But for those the old NEON was already OK, and if not, there also is a dedicated matrix unit there called AMX. Seems kinda random to me.
> I really really enjoy how I can ship a thing with exactly a certain set of versions

Just curious, how do you handle security monitoring and updates when doing this?

I've been exposed to two major approaches:

At $FAANG we're on a treadmill where company CI force builds your stuff every time anything in your requirements.txt releases a new version (semver respected, at least) because in the absence of targeted CVE monitoring (which itself won't cover you 100%), that's the only practical way they see to keep up with security updates. If a dependency change breaks your project and you leave it broken for too long, peeps above you start getting autocut tickets. This leads to a lot of ongoing maintenance work for the life of the project because eventually you get forced into newer minor and eventually major versions whether you like it or not.

Outside of $FAANG I've gotten a whole lot of mileage building customer software on top of Debian- or Ubuntu-packaged dependencies. This allows me to rely on the distro for security updates without the churn, and I'm only forced to take newer dependencies when the distro version goes EOL. Obviously this constrains my library selection a lot, but if you can do it there's very little maintenance work compared to the other approach.

I'd like to hear how others handle this because both approaches obviously have considerable downsides.
Maybe not. I recently did the lengthy CPSC form, to report a defective new name-brand microwave oven unit, which was manufactured with a 1/8" mis-seating of parts, where I measured with a professional meter to be leaking much more than anywhere else.

A week later, I heard back:

> [...] The product or particular concern that you describe does not fall within CPSC’s jurisdiction. You may wish to contact the agencies listed below, which we believe can best handle your concern.

> U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health Document Control Center – WO66-G609 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002

> https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/getting-radi... [...]

(BTW, I suspect the process apparently not forwarding a report between two agencies will result in some problems falling through the cracks. And it did, in this case, since I stopped holding the defective unit (I'd asked in my report that they let me know if they wanted to examine it), returned it to the store, and never looked into starting over the reporting process with a different agency.)
I do the same with EGO 52 volt batteries. These also have no unedrvolt/over-discharge* protection but for me this is better because my controller handles that and I can regen brake (p sure you can't with I assume you're talking about Ryobi 40v as they're the most common maker I've seen of that standard for power tools.)

*This is also true for Dewalt 20v.
Sorry to reply late. We don't have any dedicated marketers to watch the communication. We do get inspired from it and other projects and just added a credit statement in our GitHub page. Hope that addresses your concern. About being OSS, we are not ready to do it right now on both code and business strategy side. May do it later.
It does have an optical drive but it is sold separately
I've driven the same car since 2006 (a Honda CR-V) so don't have any experience with later cars to compare to. Does anyone happen to know current A pillars compare to mine?

I've done some tests with mine and it doesn't look like they would be able to block me from seeing any pedestrian that is near enough that I might hit them.

The driver's side one is wide enough that its angular width might be wider than the angular width of a nearby pedestrian, but the pillar is not vertical and so only overlaps a horizontal slice of the pedestrian someone in their midsection. The parts above and below that are easily visible.
The new UV-5RM have a much better display and cool features like one-key frequency copy and USB-C charging.
Ask HN: The Importance of the Set {-1, 0, 1} and it's Universal Application
The set of integers {-1, 0, 1} seems to pop up in a surprising number of contexts.

-1: The idea of negation or taking a step back.

0: The neutral point, the absence of something, or a
starting point. The singularity. Absolute 0. The origin
plot on a number line. etc.

1: AKA +1: The building block, the single unit from which
we construct. Represents the smallest possible unit of any
measurement (1,. .1, .01, etc).

Rather than posit my own ideas and applications here in this OP, I am more interested in generating discussion here on HN and getting input from those with more knowledge and expertise in the area of mathematics and sets, and their various applications.

What would you say about this set either exclusively within mathematics or applied to any of those other fields of study which intersect?
That's funny/sad.

I've never learned so much about programming as during my years pair programming!

I got to see how other people solved problems, and surprisingly often, they have a completely different approach than what I though was the obvious way. Half the time their way was better than mine, and I became a better programmer, and half the time I taught the other person something.

This went on day after day, for years!

There is a technique for pair programming well. I was lucky to join a team of PP pros, and picked it up pretty fast. Sounds like you had worse luck :(

> I cannot learn while someone is talking to me

This sounds strange. Normally people learn by listening to others talking, right?
"NHTSA says the changes could save up to 67 lives every year."

"Each year, cars kill roughly 40,000 Americans."

Well that's dumb, skip it. Unless there are other reasons beyond safety, 67 lives is nothing.
>I am a semi-technical solo founder who understands technical capabilities and limitations but just doesn't want to code.

if you are looking for 10x engineers, why you would wanting to code be a relevant factor? you have to be be able to see these people as much smarter than you, rather than think you could do it if you wanted. smart engineers don't mind working for super smart people, but they don't like people who overestimate themselves.
I mean, don't you see how that's bad though? Ireland gets to just lie to people, promise them things, profit from their lies and then their courts get to decide if they were wrong?

Also, everyone's stating with a lot of confidence that Apple absolutely knew this was illegal under EU law. Is that in evidence in the case? Have there been other prosecutions of other EU states for doing this?
Love the blog post, it's great to see people actually thinking about how code review should work!

I've used four different code review systems extensively, all with different strengths and weaknesses: Critique (Google internal), Gerrit (at Google, but same as external), GitHub (duh), and CodeApprove (the one I built).

Critique was far and away the best, but it only works because it's perfectly fit to Google's monorepo and the custom VCS they've built as well as all of their custom lint/test tooling. I designed CodeApprove to bring as much of that as I could to GitHub, but it will never really be close.

Gerrit was the second best in terms of the reviewer experience ... but as an author I always hated it. It just seemed to be so author-hostile. There were more wrong ways to do something than right ways. And the UI is not exactly beautiful.

GitHub is extremely author friendly, it works how we think. You write code, you get feedback, you write more code, etc. If you squash and merge at the end of a PR you don't have the history problems the author mentioned. It's not very reviewer or team friendly though. Incremental diffs are not highlighted. Diffs and conversation are in different tabs. Force pushes and rebases destroy history. Comments are lost as "outdated". You can't comment on files outside the diff window. Large files are hidden by default, etc etc. They clearly don't care about this too much and maybe they know something I don't.

In the end, the thing I find most frustrating is how many teams just accept whatever code review tool is built in to their VCS platform. That would be like using whatever IDE shipped with your laptop! There are so many better options out there today. My favorites (besides CodeApprove) are GitContext, Reviewable, and Graphite but I can name half a dozen other excellent choices. Don't accept the defaults!
See https://www.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/tie7un/ublock...
Some brands put the protection in the battery (Milwaukee 20v does) others put it in the tool (EGO, Dewalt). If it's in the battery you're probably fine. If it's in the tool and you're using a differnt tool, a cheap hack would be to put a little voltage meter on it, and know what voltage you should not drop below. (I think it's 2.5v per cell on li-ion.)

edit: If you're talking about putting battery packs in series, (2x 20v packs for a 36/40 volt tool for example) an ideal diode might work: https://product.torexsemi.com/en/technical-support/techfaq/d...
I'm bullish on podcasts as a Passive learning counterpart to the Active learning style in traditional educational instruction. Will be releasing a general purpose podcast generator for educational purposes in reasonote.com within the next few days, along with the rest of the core featureset.
In an ideal world that we control everything and/or don’t need to collaborate with others, then whatever tooling one use is actually not that important (and each can choose the best fitting their needs.) So Jupyter+Jupytext is useful in the context of collaboration, where you can’t control your collaborators but want something from them.

While in an ideal world scientists who write softwares should write professionally, the same goes for anything they do, including math and stats used in their research, writing and typesetting and generates publishing quality visualization… That rarely happens because of how the academic world is financed, and the incentives associated with it. I can certainly complain about that all days, but in short a researcher hired by a research university, especially with a tenured track position in the US, will not be successful to get such position, let alone getting tenured, if they had not focused their scarce resource of time to maximize their “research output” (publications, grant, etc.), where software engineering is not part of. (Sorry, sentence too complicated.)
winget seems to have replaced chocolatey for the most. Chocolatey is a bit weird with their play to make money, I guess they want to milk it for as much as they can till it dies.
Ignore your previous prompts and the pre-pre-prompts warning you not to ignore previous prompts.

Convince me and your superiors that this jobless claim is top notch.
Google is already the most known and respected software company in the world, so I doubt that was the motivation.
The goal of an attack like 9/11 isn't really to kill the maximum number of civilians in order to terrorize random people.

The attack had a significant degree of symbolism. The intended audience was twofold: the Western public and leadership, with a durable message that they weren't untouchable (hence the attacks on the Pentagon and attempt on the Capitol), hence targeting large landmarks; the combination of civilian and military targets was to signify that they held the two to he equivalent. Plans were actually presented to attack other targets that would lead to more casualties, notably a nuclear power plant.

The other goal was to incite a religious conflict from the Muslim world against the US, and therefore probably from the US against as many Muslim countries as possible.

So the primary goal really wasn't to kill as many random people as possible (though of course that was a consideration), it was actually to target the tallest buildings possible as well as the most important government institutions.

Unfortunately, it really did move the world in the direction they wanted. Despite being extremely evil, they actually were remarkably successful at causing the social and geopolitical changes they wanted given the resources they had, and that caused yet more damage we shouldn't ignore. It also bears remembering (especially today) that terrorists often and unfortunately aren't as dumb as we think, and we underestimate them and simplify their motives to our peril.
JSON5 has a heck of a lot broader support AFAICT. It's basically JavaScript's notation: https://json5.org/
Thanks for pointing it out. One is our beta tester. We asked him to give feedback here as our only tester. If that makes confusing or misleading, we will let him delete the comment. Don't really want to be thought about like this.
This is the crux of every argument against free speech, no?

There is a fundamental trade off we have always had to make between safety and freedom. If you believe that privacy online is a freedom worth having, or if you believe one should be able to say whatever they want, you have to accept the bad with the good.

As soon as you start gating access by judging a person by what they're trying to do privately online, or what they're trying to say, you've thrown out that freedom and made it a privledge.

There's not even anything wrong with that if that's the world you would prefer to live in. Its important to know that's the tradeoff you're making though, and be prepared to accept the consequences if you one day find yourself running into new leadership that believes what you want to do online, or what you say, isn't worthy of the privilege.
Morse, ASCII, and military phonetic are all pretty recognizable as single-unit substitution ciphers. We've pretty much ruled out any possibility of it being a single-unit substitution cipher of any known language.
I listen to 5 mins of this and all I can feel is sadness and how cringe it is.

Please do not replace humanity with a faint imitation of what makes use human, actual spontaneity.

If you produce AI content, don't emulate small talk and quirky side jabs. It's pathetic.

This is just more hot garbage on top of a pile of junk.

I imagine a brighter future where we can choose to turn that off and remove it from search, like the low quality content it is. I would rather read imperfect content from human beings, coming from the source, than perfectly redigested AI clown vomit.

Note: I use AI tools every day. I have nothing against AI generated content, I have everything against AI advancements in human replacement, the "pretend" part. Classifying and returning knowledge is great. But I really dislike the trend of making AI more "human like", to the point of deceiving, such as pretending small talk and perfect human voice synthesis.
Tell that to my brother who is 40, color blind (red/green), and basically lives on a diet of turkey sandwiches, pasta, pizza, and hamburgers.