skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think this is one scenario where C++ type-templated string formatters could shine.

Especially if you extended them to indicate assumptions about the values at compile time. E.g., possible ranges for integers, whether or not a floating point value can have certain special values, etc.
rich text content should never be the default paste. just give me the damn text I copied
I think that was a joke trying to play with the dumb idea where using certain words makes you deserve punishment.
I think an interesting question this raises is what are the differences between effective founder mode companies and manager mode companies in terms of communication structure and how can this be modelled and analysed (e.g. using some kind of network analysis of a temporal graph).
I'm as big a libertarian as anyone, and I see the logic and morality of this argument.

Still, I can't be against violating people's rights by stopping them from suicide, and keeping them locked up for a while afterward. A close friend is alive because this.
Because it sets arbitrary rules that are in no way linked to competences.

It is mostly about maintaining a specific kind of CEO that makes investors and boards comfortable.

So perpetuating bias and uniformity more than performance.
Teslas 'FSD' is not the commonly understood HOOTL self driving.
Sounds like investigating actual crimes. Unless you know for a fact that only Latinos are investigated for these crimes, or they are disproportionately investigated (out of all the people committing such fraud in that jurisdiction), you're looking at it all wrong. But thanks for trying.
AWS to invest over a billion dollars to boost cloud, AI in Africa
The only difference between what you wrote and what I wrote is that you removed the first filter and critiqued my comment becuase the second filter failed.

The ability to pay attention is where the unexpected comes from in my judgement. The whole world looks at something and tunes out early because they think they understand. An individual that is truly paying attention notices all the subtleties that that can be used for a fresh solution.

My point is that an inconsistent superstar is not as good as an individual with a consistently fresh solution.

Going out one more layer I thought the topic was how to have a stable organization with consistently fresh thinking. I responded to a topic discussing how to attract superstars. I believe anyone has the capability of being a superstar in the right environment.
The mentioned "Johnson–Lindenstrauss lemma" is especially interesting: it essentially states that for N>3, the number M of almost perpendicular vectors you can fit into an N-dimensional space is M>>N.

This makes it possible to embed a lot of facts into the encoding vectors of an LLM.
I suppose the status quo is an inevitable consequence of technology expanding the practical spheres of influence of world powers. It sure would be nice though to have a world without globalization, still full of cultural diversity.
It did well because of Kissinger and relationship with US.
12.6 and rising.
This article is from a long time ago and the spec changed substantially.

It's now all done with properties on ElementInternals:

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/ElementInte...

They also decided not to ship AccessibleNode's which is unfortunate because it removed the clearest path for canvas+wasm based UIs.

https://github.com/WICG/aom/blob/gh-pages/explainer.md
I know what you're saying, but I'm not sure I get your meaning - are you pointing out the shortcomings of the iPhone platform, or are you pointing out the software as being the issue?
Same here. I used to have Linux on my iPod and Xbox, MythTV running on a server and Fujitsu netbook. Now between the hockey rinks and soccer fields, I take out my iPad Pro for HN, light photo editing and Netflix if I’m lucky enough to find an hour of down time. There’s enough Linux, QNX, Windows, FreeRTOS, Azure, etc etc all day at work now.
> something

That's the keyword. Something, not "need for uniqueness."

The change can be anything, e.g. a change in the respondent population, or a trend from desktop to mobile (which has been reported to have an effect on how people answer scale questions). E.g., if you look at the graphs, there's an increase in standard deviation over time, and a pretty big one too. Where does that come from? You can't just say "hey, I have a post-hoc hypothesis, some very noisy data, and some correlation fits, so I must be right."

> isn’t it appropriate to interpret it as at least a flawed piece of evidence against ... a rise in social anxiety

In what way? First, need for uniqueness and social anxiety are two different things. Second, the need for uniqueness may have risen, while other trends are pushing the line downwards. And third, the relation between the questionnaire and need for uniqueness is tentative, to say the least. One of the questions they included is “It is better to always agree with the opinion of others than to be considered a disagreeable person.” It's all hand waving.

So no, I can't agree, and it would be unethical to draw any real-life conclusions from such an article.

> I’m not sure it’s fair to imply that serious people didn’t think seriously

It is naive to think they found a solution for that, and forgot to mention it in the article. The fact that demographic data wasn't available for 3/4 of the respondents should give that thought a pause.

Academics don't work for the truth, but for publications and citations. It's the main reason so many studies in psychology are simply false.
If they just had more oil, then US could bring them democracy.
> Why though?

It bothers me too, why? because it's circular reasoning: acceleration can't explain acceleration.

> Would it help if the sheet were in a centrifuge?

No, for the same reason. (You're imagining a tube-shaped membrane?)

To make it worse, it's developing a wrong idea that hides the right and deeply strange idea: when an object passes a mass and its path seems to deflect what's really happening is that the object is moving in a straight line the whole time and space itself is curved. (The situation is actually a little stranger than that, but I'm no physicist so I won't try to explain any further.)
Often when they are meticulously designed it is for revenue generation and not safety.
Layered in this awful post is some criticism worth at least thinking about.
I agree, although maybe Eisner was a bit of a hybrid, and was able to be a bridge between the founder model that Disney relied on for years and the current structure.
Getting married and having children is expensive. If you have the money to do those things, you are more likely to be someone who can also afford a home sooner than others. It's not a matter of widespread personal preference, that's ridiculous.
Sure, but I just wish everybody adopted JSON5, all the advantages of JSON + a few more human ones.

https://json5.org/
You can't criticize Israel or you will get punished by government in US.

This is hyperbolic and obviously false.

Brain-dead and authoritarian though the anti-BDS legislation is -- it is ultimately a corner case with very narrow applicability.

On the whole, you are perfectly free to criticize Israel in the U.S., and of course countless people have been doing just that for multiple decades.
It gets more fundamental than this. These laws for involuntary commitment are civil laws and lack the protections of criminal court. The hearings can be ex parte, you don't have a right to an attorney, and proof is only what is more likely than not and not beyond a reasonable doubt. If you had a lawyer at the hearing and the proof required overcoming reasonable doubt, then there would be fewer abuses (one would hope anyways).

These types of abuses happen with all the "institutional" civil laws - involuntary commitment, civil asset forfeiture, guardianship, red flag, and especially protection from abuse orders (weaponized in divorces fairly commonly). It will continue to increase as we, as a society, continue to favor quick and easy "fixes" to overcome the protections found on the criminal side.
This is awesome, for the past few months I’ve wondered why there was nothing like edit for Linux and now we have it, great.
> Chris Ellison, the managing director of Mineral Resources, said the industry could not afford to continue down the path of flexible working, and that his company was investing in amenities at the firm’s head office in Perth, Western Australia, to keep people from leaving the building.

> “I want to hold them captive all day long,” Ellison said during a financial presentation on Thursday. “I don’t want them leaving the building … I don’t want them walking down the road for a cup of coffee. We kind of figured out a few years ago how much that cost.”

What a delightful human, to show us why labor regulations are crucial.
I suppose the CEO will be happy to pay a mobthly subscription fee for the raw materials that were used to build the forever mouse.

The idea of an excellent quality product with an extremely long warranty period is a good one though. But a subscription model as the only choice seems just wrong.
I have a feeling that Apple's unique organizational structure[1] will likely share a lot what Paul is describing as "Founder Mode"

[1] https://hbr.org/2020/11/how-apple-is-organized-for-innovatio...
>shame it's all so expensive compared to flights!

I'm trying a new thing as an experiment - Wizz air had an unlimited one year pass for 499 euro. Some unlikely destinations like Iceland and Maldives.
The majority of pro-Ukraine content used by journalists are on Twitter. Has always been the case since the very beginning of the war. Take a look at any article on TWZ, like the most recent one:

https://www.twz.com/news-features/ukraine-pushing-slowly-wes...
Neat tool. A couple of suggestions:

I'd make it fetch the meta tags and image using the user agent string of the services you're showing previews for. For example, Twitter/X fetches meta tags with a user agent string of Twitterbot/1.0. Some sites may serve different content to different services in order to optimise the image for display on that service.

It also looks like your API may not be looking at Twitter-specific meta tags [0], as it just returns one set of metadata that's used by every preview. For example on https://govukvue.org I use the 'summary' card format, which shows a small image with the name and description beside it. But your tool renders it as if it's a 'summary_large_image'.

[0] https://developer.x.com/en/docs/x-for-websites/cards/overvie...
There’s two parts to this.

1. By porting the frontend to SwiftUi, they’re actually making it more native for all Apple platforms. He hints at it, but this is a great first step to having Godot native on visionOS where they can iterate on their games natively in device.

2. A lot of creators (not necessarily developers) have switched to the iPad as a primary creation device. Perhaps not a majority by any means, but a sizeable amount.

Concept artists are on iPad. Recently the character designer for Blue Eye Samurai did most of their work in Procreate.

3D sculptors are picking it up as well with Nomad sculpt and I think the soon to be released ZBrush for iPad (September 10th apparently).

So if you’re on the more visual side of things, and you’ve already got your workflow on iPad, this lets you continue that workflow.
Have they asked you for help? Mind your own business
One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest
Worryingly sounds like the US government!
Great comment, curious to hear more about your perspective.

> The problems became immediately apparent when we lacked the organizational authority to actually get important things done. We could write the software, but we needed the VP and CTO to actually use their positions in meetings to get agreement from other departments about the important cross-organizational factors of getting software implemented and adopted.

Would it be fair to diagnose this as an issue where the tech side of the business ran in an open, proactive way but other departments had a top-down mentality that required interfacing with the head of your department?

In other words - do you think it is a necessary/desirable feature that ICs need organizational authority from the CTO to push major changes? I get that given how the rest of the org functioned, it would have been much better to have more top-down mentality from the CTO. But is there a better equilibrium where this is not required?
Before the Speccy got famous, I remember seeing such kind of Z80 building kits on electronic hardware stores on my small Portuguese town.
I just wish everybody adopted JSON6, all the advantages of JSON5 + a few more human ones.
I think you’ll find it is the right wing who find themselves invariably attracted to war.

Unless you’re using “the left” to mean “neoliberals”, as seems to be common among the American right, in which case let me refer you to the first paragraph (since the American Democratic Party is by all measures a right wing party).
The mesothelioma commercials only really became prevalent after suits were won and the firms knew they could get money just by adding more people to the class (or really getting them to collect).
We don’t know how often he will use this corporate jet. They are going to stand up a remote office with his own assistant. He could very well be in Seattle once a week and everything else handled via Zoom.
I think a little bit of it is fine.

The person pointed out a specific limitation. And then offered a solution. Very clearly stating that they made it.

Somebody might find this useful.
I've been an Elm user since 2016, wrote my start up in Elm, and frequently collaborate with notable members of the Elm community.

Gleam's approach to community and maintainership has almost nothing in common with Elm's, and deliberately so.
You mean because I occasionally crack a joke?
Sabine is awesome
Businesses periodically have to reinvent themselves in order to survive. But it's hard for experienced executives to accept that the playbook that worked for 20 years no longer does. Businesses fail when executives refuse to accept that their accumulated wisdom and experience has lost its value. Exuberant youthful ignorance isn't everything but neither is being an excellent navigator of a world that no longer exists.
No, just make them pay out 30k in installments if they arw liable for something.

Or take them to court. The average person will lose hundreds of thousands of dollars in their lifetime from required insurance for all type of dumb things.

We need the government to force everyone to pay an organization that does nothing but hold money in case of accidents and then release it back. We need this because people are too cowardly and fearful, so they accept financial sodomy in exchange for a very small piece of mind.

If we are going to force insuramce on people, why not just go all the way and start forcing people to not eat junky food. It costs the us citizen way more to pay for the obese and unhealthy than anywhere close to the average american will pay for an accident without insuramce. Might as well start restricting all freedoms. Take my money take my freedom, here let me bend over. That is all of you. Paying 30-50% i taxes to the government accepting that they can force you to buy a service i.e. health insurance, car insurance.

Weak people vote for more government control, because thwy are cowardly rats. They desire being controlled, read anti-oedipus and you'll understand that your little brain enslaves itself in a false prison. The mind of weak disgusting borderline subspecies humans have formed a societal prison, where freedom doesn't exist. And the strong non mentally ill are forced to accept this prison or will be insulted saying "they don't common sense" or "aren't practical".

Enough talk, the fact that a lesser human like you actually gets to determine how I live my life is disgusting. The wardens of the prison are everyday "people" who should be culled like cattle. I don't dislike the system, because its an illusion. The system is just a bunch of lesser humans who have drank the koolaid, you don't drink it and they will call you crazy. Reminds me of how Uncle Ted fought against the prison after escaping from the mind control of mass psychosis, so we locked him up. I wish with all my heart God exists, so when all you die you are judged and you have your face smashed into reality and truth at a million miles per second. The few sane are forced to fit in the sea of the mental midgets, who exist not ambivalent to slavery, but as its enablers.
It is not that we've stopped, we've made it harder in some parts of the world, by adopting a liberal form of government and splitting powers. Remember what happened just few years back with Trump and the assault on congress.

Or extremists gaining power, it's not that we've improved, it's that people had enough to eat. But it's slowly changed also here, you can be pragmatic or starving, but not both.

But other democracies and governments are not as strong, and of course, in the west we're enjoying some level of stability that also is a result of exploitation of other parts of the world that is then fighting over a limited amount of remaining resources
> Cars And Drinking Don’t Mix

For better or for worse, the Midwest thinks very differently about this

> Nighttime is stigmatized

This is true in the rust belt, as many of the shootings etc that occur are after dark, often at 1-2am, near bars or outside of places that serve or sell alcohol (after hours joints or party stores)
Reread his post - I think ultimately he's saying "lesson learned".

Am an American and wouldn't dream of doing something like this.
Anarchy is when two factions try to govern instead of one? It is an interesting take. I can't say it makes sense.
Luckily my thoughts on this site don’t dictate what international governments do, but thanks for your input?
See also:

'One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest' (1975)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTSz56rs_WE
> ..with Python mentality

As opposed to what mentality ? I mean any tool I worked with has the same problem.
This is absolutely true, and it’s surprising how little literature there is on this topic (I think founder is not synonym to leader so HBR articles are not 100% relevant).

In my simplified view, founders care about the company like it’s their baby. On the other hand, managers tend to focus more on their own careers, their teams, and external relationships. This is natural since they know they’ll likely move on to a different company at some point.
If you’re just going to use the platform built in, then the size of a third party library doesn’t matter to you.
Not everyone can be a founder.

But in my experience a good founder doesn’t necessarily make a good leader. Not a CEO anyway, but it depends on the role of the CEO. If the the CEO is “chief strategy and opportunity officer” then some founders are often quite well suited to it.

But we should bear in mind that all founders do not have the same skill set. Woz was also a founder of Apple and a great engineer but not a CEO.
Counter-example: Reed Hastings, co-founder and the CEO of Netflix for 22 years, famously did the opposite of what pg is saying. Reed insisted on a particular style of employee freedom & responsibility that IMO set the benchmark for innovating year after year and avoiding micro-managers, even as it scaled up past 2000 engineers. This story still has not been fully told. Reed was closely involved but perhaps the opposite of Steve Jobs.

Sounds like chesky and pg want to turn the tide on that dominant culture in software companies. And I couldn't agree more! A big problem IMO is that most "professional software managers" are taught a management style that focuses on risk. Risk-aversion permeates every decision from compensation to project priorities. It's so pervasive it's like the air they breathe, they don't even realize their doing it. This is how things run in 99% of companies.

So, my fellow hackers. There is a better way. It's neither the Steve Jobs model nor the John Sculley model. Looks like pg has not yet found it. I hope he does, though. It would be great for YC to encourage experimentation here.
It really is. People have a hard time balancing focusing on their deliverables vs truly paying attention (either broadly or deeply). I tend to err toward the attention side which makes me a terrible task deliverer, but I think on balance paying attention has been more valuable.
You can’t tell the difference between two private parties contesting in a court of law and authoritarian states attempting to suppress the rights of their political opponents?

I think you can but who/whom eh comrade?
It seems that you agree that they are wealthier than they would otherwise be because they try to minimise taxes.

The rest of your comment seems to be a political commentary on whether inheritance is legitimate. You're entitled to your opinion, but it comes across a bit like sour grapes to me.
I tried it and was shortly spammed with crypto-bro messages. Interesting tech but a bad product.
Pixels, Clicks and Emotional Tricks
HN try not to argue against RTO challenge. Difficulty: impossible.
And #2 is only to be used if absolutely unavoidable and even then, I would think hard about alternatives such as ditching the service that would require using that solution.
My complaint (from above, not the only problem with cameras) about the rear camera is that the cheapest way for them to be installed nowadays, given that other people want infotainment systems, is for them to go hand-in-hand with an infotainment system. Whether the camera is on or not, the car is now vulnerable.

The sin being committed is having too much code, especially too much untrusted, untested code (it's "just a radio") wired into the canbus. Toss in a little auto-update functionality and some always-on antennas, and you have all the makings of a nasty exploit. Last I checked, none of those have been known to be exploited in the wild, but they've also not been patched in the last decade. It's a fundamental design flaw that saves a few dollars, so it persists.
> It's fine if you run it at a cloud provider. Setting up a k8s cluster yourself is painful though and at a cloud provider it costs far more than using just bare metal

I think it's almost exactly the opposite: I'd rather use cloud-specific tooling on clouds but k8s is a Better OpenStack on bare metal. It provides a standardized layer upon which generally-reasonable tools can operate without thinking about it much. There is a cost factor--it doesn't need to be a high one, though, and it's also a forcing function into stuff like "actually thinking about redundancy" ahead of time.

I've deployed in production everything you described and unless I was optimizing, as you are, for cut-to-the-bone opex and personal stress when it breaks bad (which is not a judgment call but it is certainly not the only reasonable decision to make; investing more in operations to have more "bounce" when things goes bad is not a bad thing), a reasonably thought-out k8s environment is going to be easier than shell scripts from the 90s once I need to have anyone who isn't me take over a problem.