skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Here's the thing, champ: you downvoted my comment because you didn't read beyond the first line, which is evident from the fact that you completely ignored the approach that I was advocating.

1. Install OneTab

2. Open all of the links on HN you want in separate tabs

3. Hit the OneTab extension icon

You now have all of those tabs waiting for you, across all devices, sorted not just by date but by session. You can move tabs between those sessions if you have a way you like to organize things.

If you go back and read your reply, it quickly becomes clear that you didn't even try to understand what I was showing you.

Also: pinned tabs != ephemeral tabs. This is very much a false equivalency. If you have mandatory tabs, that's very different from pinning a tab to come back to it later.

Seriously, just install OneTab and enjoy your life a bit more.
Someone also made it possible to stream anything that yt-dlp can download https://git.sr.ht/~shironeko/fcast/tree/yt-dlp/item/clients/...
Which part of that law have the users of VPNs violated?
Ask HN: Can individual setup payment gateway like stripe easily?
I think right now to use payment processor like stripe, we need to incorporate at least 1 corp… which to be honest feels a bit bloated to start selling. Is there how to do this easily, or do we have alternatives?

P.S Im non US
Hey HN!
I made this pre-order site for my startup but I think the copy of this site needs to be updated.
Can you suggest me some changes?
I worked with Scala professionally once and agree it’s very similar. Honestly what put me off Scala the most were the atrocious compile times, it was like working with big complex C++ projects in that respect. Sorry but my time is more valuable than that.
In its original context, this puzzle was part of the 2013 Mystery Hunt which was being solved in real time during a single weekend by numerous large teams (and included about 200 different puzzles, of which this was just one). Those teams were all very familiar with the convention that every puzzle must solve to a word or phrase, and that this typically requires finding the appropriate "extraction".

Teams could "call in" their proposed answers and quickly be told whether they were correct. (At that time that was done partly over the telephone; now it's normally done automatically by a web site, with some kind of rate limiting on guesses.)

There's still a question of whether a particular extraction is good or bad, whether a particular answer is thematic, and whether the answer feels contrived. But for the originally intended audience, the extraction step was fully expected.

(I was on one of the teams that solved this in 2013, and in fact we had written the 2012 Mystery Hunt which the Manic Sages won in order to win the right to organize the 2013 event.)

Here are a few links to materials that try to explain this genre of puzzle events and some of the things that people might expect and might try:

https://puzzles.mit.edu/resources.html

It's understandable that a lot of this could be confusing or seem arbitrary when solving the puzzle outside of the larger puzzlehunt context.
X is not communications technology. It's a forum website controlled by a private company. It's not like they're a protocol or that they're infrastructure.
Can you even buy physical copies of streaming shows? Or online news? Or podcasts?
2013 MIT Mystery Hunt (January 2013), the Coin Heist from the Manic Sages.
Show HN: Logic Gates – Learn logic gates in a fun AND interactive way
The law does apply. Xitter is being sued, but Elon refuses to appoint a legal representative in the country. The judge has the right to ban the product until the owner or their representative shows up.
Ocode.dev, an AI-powered tool I developed over a weekend for my frontend chores. Initially, it was something I built for myself, but after a few colleagues showed interest, I realized it could be beneficial to others too.

With Ocode, you can simply upload a UI image or drop your idea into the chat, and it’ll generate a fully functional and publicly shareable webpage for you. I’m thrilled to launch this as a product, and I hope it makes your frontend work easier!

Looking forward to your feedback and suggestions!
It's not "not user friendly", it's criminally user hostile as a deliberate act. I know - incompetence over malice. But this is wilful malice of Apple to cover for their incompetence, so yeah maybe both. Not to mention the grand Apple opacity.
even with javascript they require money. possibly they require javascript to tell you about that
Worms still use them as homing missiles for their Armageddon battles
Much earlier in my career, I was in the UK public sector.

Internal interviews within the department were conducted using something that mixed STAR with a set of core competencies (external candidates were given a bit more leeway).

So as the interviewee, you had to reply in the style of STAR but also ensure that your answers tied back into those competences. To have a chance of success, you'd need to demonstrate as many competences as possible.

As a methodology it makes it extremely easy for the interviewer to assess suitability (especially for candidates trying to move up the chain - there used to be a qualification assessment for that too) and to do so in a way that can easily be explained/defended if a decision is challenged.

As an interviewee, though, it really was the most awful experience. The questions themselves weren't codified, so the interviewer could ask whatever they liked and you had to find a way to tie it back to a relevant competence in order for your answer to "count" and then explain using STAR.

The problem, in my view, is that there's a huge difference between what works for interviewers and what's likely to work for an interviewee. STAR makes it easy for an interviewer, but it's not the way that engineers normally communicate - just as coding challenges are often quite unnatural (like everyone else, I've had some awful technical interviews).
> the people who are in a stage of life that really need help day to day,

They should have thought of that before they fucked up their kids.
Often I realized I really couldn’t have done [the languishing projects] without the tools and ideas (and infrastructure) I now have.

I find this idea of building your own infrastructure to accomplish goals super interesting, especially because already-made software never quite does exactly what you want. Wolfram actually wrote more about that here: https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2019/02/seeking-the-prod...
Steam is not owned by private equity.

A private company is not a corporate raider.
Efficiency is quite low: 40%-60%.

I would say it's only worth it if the marginal cost of producing the hydrogen is close to 0.
The adoption of advanced cryptography has struggled for decades. It’s a long-running cause of frustration to cryptographers, i.e. “why do we keep on developing more and more advanced schemes yet the real world doesn’t use them?”

This sentiment runs through this piece as an undercurrent.

Part of the frustration comes from the fact, which is emphasised throughout the piece, that all these things are possible in real life. The utopia of autonomous MPC and ZK agents running obfuscated programs to prove identity attributes, vote, etc is all possible, if only we rewrite the entire internet.

The stumbling block, as ever, is human nature. This utopia would decay in just the same way that the bitcoin utopia did, moving from a perfect libertarian idea for an incorruptible currency to a cesspit of fraud, manipulation and speculation.

In Moxie Marlinspike’s article on web 3, he makes the case that the decentralisation promises of web 3 will inevitably decay and be reshaped as a new form of centralisation, leaving us in a potentially worse place than before. Pretty much the same arguments apply here.

Nonetheless, it’s an interesting read. But it would be fascinating to see this approached from a human perspective, I.e. “what are the compelling adoption vectors?” and “how can we avoid re-centralisation?”
> You should read the Constitution before making random statements like these

The NJAC ruling still stands in 2024 and that set the precedent for judicial primacy in India.

Until a constitutional amendment gets passed that legislates a direct path forward, it will stand.

> The US has Marbury v. Madison

And India has SCAORA v. UOI 2014 which is functionally the same.

> BSD

BSD is functionally the same as the American constitution and Bill of Rights.

> If the President asked the judges to go pound sand, there is nothing can can do about it except hold a press conference

The President in the US is the executive, not the legislative branch.

> every part of the Supreme Court (size, age of the judges etc) is in the hands of Parliament

This is the same in the US, but for customary reasons Congress has not touched this can of worms.

The same showdown Modi and the Collegium had over NJAC is very similar to the showdown FDR and the Supreme Court had over the Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937.

Modi ended up in the same position and the exact same kind of loss like FDR did in 1937.
Unless laws exist to prevent this, you can bet that ALL BigTech are doing this, to varying levels. If they are not doing it in your country, you can bet they are doing it in other countries. The US government incentivised them to do this with the PRISM program ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM ) and showed them the value of collecting user data even if they do not need it (right now) for their services and products.

That services like Alexa, Siri, Cortana, Assistant etc. exist with 24x7 listening devices shows that cost is no longer a hurdle in deploying this at scale. And note that they do not have to upload the audio files (which by the way, they can - I remember Google showcasing an audio codec - https://github.com/google/lyra - that is suitable for very low bandwidth, so neither bandwidth nor storage is a big issue today). Today's phones also have enough power to transcribe the audio on device itself (e.g. Google Live Transcribe feature now works when offline - https://9to5google.com/2022/03/10/google-live-transcribe-fea... ). Why do you think there is a sudden push now to put AI on SoCs and thus on device? It's partly because BigTech want to offload more and more processing on to your device. We are at a stage where hardware has outpaced system software development and is actually underutilised.

(And we are also at the techno-cultural cusp where the ownership of most of our devices are questionable, and moving towards a dystopian future where we will no longer be able to claim rights on these computing devices).
Does this mean that even the Python 3.13 version is around the corner we have to expect some issues when running threads on a program?

Maybe I’m slow today, but are the author complaining (rightfully so) about the buggy no-gil implementation?

Should we wait until the feature is more stable before implementing new libraries? I was thinking on making use of it in new libraries I plan to develop.

What are the most blatant use case to test this feature?

PD: So many questions, I know, sorry everybody!
No, because you didn't invalidate the cases for which it is used. People should continue using the feature if it meets their needs.

You also didn't address spam and security issues if someone is able to endlessly produce anonymous email addresses and send unprompted emails. This is almost certainly why Apple wouldn't implement this feature as you want.
Aren't newspapers all in a terrible financial state?

Mostly requiring subsidy by billionaires wanting to popularise their weird political views?
This reminds me of when I constantly got a gender symbol identifier after certain emojis sent from iPhones to Android. I thought it was some new kind of feminist trend, but it was just my phone not parsing it correctly
Write modern code with features of C++17 and C++20
The Three Most Common Challenges with Freemium–and How to Fix Them
And yet, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sl6en1NPTYM
sshpass is a travesty of security.

It has all the pitfalls of putting your front door key under your doormat. Except you're doing it in a world where everyone can materialize a unique key out of thin air, and you can always instantly tell your door which of those keys should or shouldn't be allowed to open it.

sshpass is a curse, even calling it a crutch would be improper flattery. It's a dangerous cheat that accomplishes nothing except impeding people from otherwise spending the 20 minutes it takes to figure out SSH keys.
The years help. As they do everywhere. Competitive job market all around right now.

Taking the question at face value, I don't know your intent, and not as a bitter commentary on the experience of trying to find a job with tech one likes:

I know people that did embedded C++ that got recruited into doing Elixir on a Nerves project.

I know lots of people who have just switched their web work in Ruby or Python to Elixir. Either by finding the job or doing the work for getting the tech adoption OK:ed at current employer.

Most Elixir devs I know did not have prior Erlang experience. But most did have prior dev experience. The BEAM ecosystems solve problems you mostly encounter with some experience.

I have also seen and onboarded several junior folks into the ecosystem and jobs as their first professional thing.

Connecting and collaborating with people who could vouch for you when the opportunity comes is a good starting point. But there are many paths.

(edit: fix a spelling)
> However, the other branches are in the hands of the ruling socialists

I'm sorry, but... what?

The Executive is the one closest to this qualification, but Lula, Haddad, Zé Múcio, Tebet and the others in power are nowhere even close to being socialists! Lula perhaps, until about a couple decades ago was a little bit closer but now he's not even on the left very much.

The Congress and the Senate, on the other hand, are mostly in the hands of neopentecostal evangelicals, the pro-gun nutjobs, the agrobusiness tycoons and other capitalists and fascists.
I'm a C developer. What I see from some in the C kernel dev camp is a refusal to participate, and further an active attempt to stonewall progress. The Rust devs have been highly accommodating in every possible way, but that's just not enough for them.
That's really fascinating! Understanding the diets and medications that contribute to such long lives could offer valuable insights for everyone.
I was astonished that all the best and most important in methodical approach mathematical books are almost unknown to students here (and, seems to me, have not been translated into French). Among these are Numbers and figures by Rademacher and Töplitz, Geometry and the imagination by Hilbert and Cohn-Vossen, What is mathematics? by Courant and Robbins, How to solve it and Mathematics and plausible reasoning by Polya, Development of mathematics in the 19th century by F. Klein.
If this is intended to support a grid, rather than be grid forming or isolated, then you'd sequence that somehow.

Somewhere with lots of solar on the grid probably has excess energy, even during winter, during the day, so you'd plan to put in the input energy to start the reaction during the afternoon peak, and if you miss that for some reason, some sort of coordinated startup procedure would likely be used.
> X will likely be blocked in Brazil at the ISP level.

That is not what is being discussed. That's just people on the internet saying that.
I knew from the very start of using macOS that it was designed around apps NOT being full-screen. Yeah, they are catering to the full-screen-apps people a little more nowadays, but embracing floating windows everywhere, and making good use of the distinction betweend CMD+Tab and CMD+~ makes it so much more powerful than just tabbing through full-screen apps, or three-finger-swiping. It also makes macOS way more beautiful to look at in my opinion.
For starters, whales aren't tool users. So it'd be something of a surprise if evolution had programmed them to feel joy when their offspring use tools. Humans, on the other hand, seem to get a bit of a kick out of teaching other people (especially kids) to do things which makes a lot of evolutionary sense given how strategically central tools are to our species.
I think there is an intelligence / co-operation grid where low intelligence high co-operation gets you herd like protective nature but crows aren’t great on co-operation - not at herd scale

Intelligent sparrows though - that would be deeply scary
Svelte 5 comes pretty close.
I don't know what you mean by "the average person" but most of my friends in Brazil, even the relatively tech illiterates, not only know what a VPN is but many or even most of them either have paid or currently pay for one.
Also curious that any mention of confidential computing is avoided throughout the piece
1. The offer is good. I was aiming at 12% more, though. Can we work it out?

2. Is on call mandatory?

3. Are there any plans to move away from 100% remote work?
I hear peroxide conversion efficiency can be as low as 30%, and concentrated peroxide is quite dangerous.
Compare with the significantly more limited brains and existences of the idiots who massacre them as a hobby.

https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/misguided-slaug...
Nope, it's a sarcastic question, you probably don't want to do this .
Java was in 1st iteration and was replaced by Typescript
Well, this managed to make me feel enough shame to throw $5 a month at them
The Certification Trap
>Who's going to pay for their rent/mortgages?

The very loud Rust (and toxic) community could maybe spare in average 1$ a month each.
It’s rarely about protecting the user from fraud but more about protecting MC from fraud as they usually shoulder these costs. Replacing passwords with tokens isn’t much different to passkeys instead of passwords.
Stress in America – A Deeper Look
Lots of people prefer riding on gravel because of fewer cars, more hills, and rural scenery.
Laptop issues have dropped markedly in the last 3~4 years; especially battery life on AMDs in the last 6~12 months, the kernel perf / scheduling changes have been pretty good.
The scenario you described is what myth, tradition, fiction and science are all telling me these days.

It's not even for SciFi movies now, with VR tech and assuming we have a couple order of magnitude more compute, it's actually plausible to actually think about building the simulation for real. (Isn't that what Meta was supposed to be about?)
So, I recently came across a research study by Selzy that analyzed over 40 billion marketing emails sent between 2020 and 2024, and it got me thinking about the state of email marketing. Despite all the noise about newer channels and platforms, the data shows that email is not only here to stay but is actually evolving in interesting ways.

Here are a few things that stood out to me:

Email is Still Dominant: The study shows that email remains the king of outbound messaging, making up over 80% of all communication channels used by marketers. Even though open rates have dipped slightly overall since 2020, there’s been a significant recovery between 2021 and 2023 (+17.8%). This means that email is still a powerful tool, especially when strategies are adapted and optimized.

E-commerce and Media Are Thriving: The E-commerce industry has seen a massive improvement in deliverability rates (+10.28%) and reduced bounce rates, while Media & Publishing experienced a whopping 60.8% growth in open rates just between 2022 and 2023. It seems like these sectors are finding new ways to engage their audiences more effectively via email.

Decline in Unsubscribe and Spam Rates: I was surprised to learn that unsubscribe rates have plummeted in sectors like Education and Marketing (down by 35%+ in 2023). Plus, overall spam rates have dropped by 44.4% since 2020, making email an even more reliable way to reach audiences.

Nonprofits Lead the Way: Nonprofits have the highest open rates (34.89%), which is quite impressive. It suggests that when emails offer genuine value or engage emotionally, people are still eager to open them.

This study really made me rethink the narrative that email is outdated or losing its edge. Instead, it seems to be evolving with new technologies, better practices, and more personalized approaches. If anything, the data shows that email is still a dynamic and essential tool in the marketing toolbox.

If you're curious, you can check out the full research here: Selzy's Email Marketing Benchmarks Research by Industry.

Would love to hear your thoughts on this – have you seen similar trends in your own experience?
The vast majority of choices are between things that are roughly on par with each other if used by people with similar experience in them, respectively.. But then you don't have shared experience for when someone is on vacation if everyone is doing the better way in their opinion, or you lose a ton of time on the arguments to choose the best way when it doesn't matter, retrain the majority on the least experienced engineers suggestion as they can offer no negative critiques of their solution, etc.

Very tolerant senior engineers are basically what you want, opinionated juniors are who apply to senior roles and make people seek out juniors who apply to junior roles.
As far as I know we both mean the same thing: loose gravel that has a grader and maybe a roller run over the surface every now and again. Surfaces in even worse condition that are basically wheel ruts filled with gravel with grass growing out the middle might called either gravel or dirt road/track, and those without gravel are just dirt roads/tracks. People use the words interchangeably at times.

I grew up around them and they were fine to ride on. They're usually so low traffic that there aren't many corrugations, though outback gravel roads like the Tanami Track are an exception, and you don't ride (or drive) too fast on them. The noise isn't really an issue for me, it just sounds crunchy in a way that blends into the background. If you're riding on one lane country roads, you're probably already used to a bit of gravel on the surface.

I think the appeal is that you're sharing the road with 30km/h tractors and 60km/h utes, not 100km/h SUVs.
Well, that was disappointing.

Was hoping for an affiliate program guide for bubble tea advertisers
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_of_Twitter
Post up some strong numbers people!

The HN community could easily pass the 100k mark in a day.

There’s a genuinely new browser to be excited about.

Let’s get it done
> There's probably some kind of tragedy of the commons

I think you mean the free rider problem. In the tragedy of the commons, a shared resources is depleted. In the free rider problem, it's only that users benefit without contributing. In both cases, the resource is non-excludable (it's public or common in a sense) but in the case of the free rider problem, the resource is non-rivalrous, meaning that consumption by one user does not reduce its availability to another. People using Servo but not contributing it does not exhaust any shared resource that we have access to (i.e. Servo itself). The resources used for its production (and any potential resources that could be) are all private, not common or public.

I guess nobody's really using it yet though since it's not really usable so it's not really formally the free rider problem yet either. It's just that nobody's really funding it.

> where nobody thinks they should be the one funding this stuff.

I wonder if it's not more like people just assume someone else is contributing or maybe they don't even know they can or don't believe they can have an impact because they don't know the details. It seems like there could be a lot of reasons and I'm not sure how to find out why they aren't getting what they need.

> I also believe there's the impression that making a brand new browser with an engine written from scratch is not realistic, so why found one? Fortunately Ladybird might have changed things on this front.

I think there are better ways to think than that. We should do what we can, even if we fail.