skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Risk and reward are intrinsically linked

There are innumerable ways to increase your risk without increasing your potential reward.
Every now and then I see post like this.

Am still surprised there isn’t a solution to make the iPad a real dev machine.

Apple must really not want us to do this.
Don't just take my word for it that this is sus...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkjyeI0ykGM
No, Starlink is blocking X. They're trying to take the high road.
Comic Sans (non-derogatory) for engineers
The freezing happened BEFORE the block order, to my knowledge.
His boards are stacked with his personal cadre of yes men.
If you care about security, consider the security-oriented Qubes OS relying on hardware virtualization and running everything in Debian and/or Fedora VMs: https://qubes-os.org. My daily driver, can't recommend it enough.
Ukrainian drones now spray 2,500° C thermite streams right into Russian trenches
Unfortunately they won't, people want their cheap crap right now no matter how much suffering it causes for the underprivileged.
Shameless plug but try my app CodeBrew, a 100% local Java IDE:

https://apps.apple.com/de/app/codebrew-ide-for-java/id647526...
> Creative destruction destroys old industries as much as it creates new ones.

Yes, of course, but this frequently comes with significant productivity benefits. This is what I'm referring to when I say "creating for free". These marginal productivity improvements are going to be harder and harder to come by over time. Huge fan of Schumpeter, btw.
Interception is a different process and usually it is more difficult.

Example of it being different process: bullets are accelerated by gun powder, but stopped by various armor.

Example of increased dificulty: interception rockets have higher demands on speed and agility. (If somebody tries to evade, you have to be faster)
And most drivers I see who deliver packages are always on the phone talking to themselves via bluetooth. So I get the sentiment.

It's not like amazon is making it up. Studies have shown that music can have an adverse effect on driving.
Just look at African or South American countries by GDP and see which ones are at the top of the list
I think there actually does need to be some re-evaluation of some of the copyright/fair use issues raised by this case, but the NEL thing they did in 2020 was a totally unnecessary risk.
Limiting services to a limited set of ports, if this forum post is still relevant today https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1780657

Regarding how to do that, it's left as an exercise to the PhD holding student.
My understanding is X followed Brazilian law by deleting the 7 offending posts, but the judge is now acting outside of the law and is demanding things of which there is no legal basis. And apparently this judge has a history of doing things like this in unrelated cases.
Going private means they don't have to disclose their financials...this is not the positive you think it is.
A third heavier, and it really feels heavy for its size. It's one of the things that made me decide not to get a Mac. I don't know why they use so much aluminum.
No they won't. It's less time consuming to lie and threaten than it is to debunk lies. In a reactionary social setting deceptive people can rely on others saying that even if something is provably fake, it must have been inspired by a truthful event, or accusing the victim of having done it themselves to get attention etc.
this is a bit tangential, but I once had a physics professor describe light waves as standing still and everything else is just moving around it.
Yes, web development IDE is what we're getting at. We first built Inspect Browser, an iOS web browser with built-in dev tools, and figured an IDE for web development with Inspect Browser embedded would be a good next step.

Now, getting PHP and NodeJS to run on device was quite the ordeal...
> No matter how badly Amazon treats its workers, we all keep shopping there.

Because they keep working there. So the workers think the conditions are worth it in exchange for their paycheck. If I disagree and shop elsewhere I'm effectively disagreeing with the workers and telling them I think they are making a bad deal and I don't want to contribute to their livelihood. But I don't actually know that they can make a better deal elsewhere.

Before I move my purchase to Newegg or whatever should I first make sure that their working conditions are better? Or just judge by how often I see each company mentioned in the media?

I think that the voluntary nature of employment is a sufficient circuit breaker. If it gets bad enough we can and do leave for better opportunities elsewhere. It wouldn't be the first, second or third time for me, and that includes minimum wage jobs. So I don't feel the duty to investigate the working conditions of each business I deal with.
Author here. This blog post is actually kind of funny; I had a flash of clarity one afternoon that wouldn't go away so I spent 8 hours in a manic frenzy banging it out in one pass with no editing. Not how most of my writing happens (typically its a tedious slog with multiple passes of editing and refinement)

Anyone who likes this article on my blog should check out this presentation on applying this philosophy to build tools

https://youtu.be/j6uThGxx-18?si=ZF8yOEkd4wxlq84X

While the blog post is very abstract, the video demonstrates how to take the abstract philosophy and use it to help solve a very concrete, very common problem
Thanks, somehow missed this one doing research
This seems to be very political- related to the upcoming Brazilian votes and freedom.
This is just a rehash of what their source https://www.freightwaves.com/news/should-truckers-be-allowed... reports which is, itself, almost entirely a rehash of social media commentary on the sourced Reddit post https://www.reddit.com/r/AmazonDSPDrivers/comments/1f2y2cp/t...

Just reading the original quoted mid article without the extra commentary it's clear the story is unrelated to listening to the radio in itself and to do with the camera mechanism monitoring for other forms of distracted driving not being able to tell the difference:

> we were told that "a lot of mouth movement will set off the camera" and that we "needed to keep mouth movement to a minimum".

Still a shitty system by all counts... but a lot easier to talk about it directly than via rehashes.
Hey, thanks for the feedback! I'm one of the devs on graphiti and adding support for custom schema is high on our to-do list. I agree that this is an important step in helping to bridge the gap between structured and unstructured data, as well as for refining the graph on specific use cases.

Currently, we do have some ways of helping the graph to understand what nodes and edges "really mean." In addition to the name of the relationship our edges also store a "hydrated" version of the fact triple. For example, if Alice and Bob are siblings you might see an edge with the name IS_SIBLING_OF between the two. In addition to this, the edge also stores the fact: "Alice is the sibling of Bob". This way we are storing much of the semantic context on the nodes and edges themselves in addition to the graph structure.

We also support ingesting structured JSON, and I those cases the edges will be exactly the properties in the JSON doc.
I’m not saying it as a marketing tactic, because I don’t work for them. I really enjoy the absence of distraction, in the same way that I enjoy it when I go to a place like a cabin in the woods with no connectivity, because the possibility of distraction is apparently always present in my mind until it’s definitively not possible.

I have enough demands on my self control in my daily life that it’s nice to not have to rely on it further.

But yeah, if you don’t find that helpful, maybe this isn’t useful for you.
Huh? You can find DE razor blades in just about any CVS or Target?
Good to know this is one of his alts
It'll be interesting to see what this analysis looks like today, considering there have been 2+ years of substantially higher interest rates since this paper was published.
It's trading significantly below book? $120 B vs $82 B.

Downside is that most of their assets are their fabs...
It’s made Reddit unusable without an account, which makes me wonder why it’s even on the web anymore and not an app. I guess legacy users that only use a web browser.
Only because of work.
Let’s say I want to ingest information from a series of interviews with multiple interviewees (multiple interviews per interviewee). It’s possible their opinions/facts change between interviews; but also each interviewee is going to have different opinions/facts.

Would it make most sense to capture this with multiple Graphiti graphs? Or would it be possible to do this in one graph?

At the end of the day the analysis would be finding insights across all interviewees and you want the cumulative knowledge…
NC Musician Charged with Music Streaming Fraud Aided by Artificial Intelligence
Indictment filing: https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/media/1366241/dl
Good point! - web development IDE would be clearer
> Instead of having to hire a full sysadmin

You need the same sysadmins (called something else to be trendy, but basically same role) either way.
Have you considered publishing your own paper about your implementation? It would make it easier to cite in the literature later on. Would major journals accept such a paper? I would assume they would if they really had questions about reproducibility.
They also don't speak much Spanish there, as the Basques have their own ancient unique language (a non-Indo-European isolate actually) and culture due to their mountain isolation and resistance to everyone, even the Romans. The people I worked with there all spoke English.

You might try reaching out to these guys if you want to visit. They actually get a lot of visitors, and there's a whole tour program I did when I was there.

https://mondragonteamacademy.com/

As far as the effectiveness of Mondragon, I agree that we shouldn't judge it by capitalist standards, but more ask: Can it survive within capitalism while still doing well by its people?

I worry that Fagor, etc. may point to that not being long-term true, but it has been around for a long time, so maybe not. I more think that their model is hard to replicate outside of their high solidary cultural environment, rather than predicting their demise.
I've attempted this with various terminal emulator / SSH apps, Cloud-9 (now part of AWS, VS Code

The major issue is that apps & tabs are evicted unexpectedly. Any time you content switch, the app has a chance to be killed.

Of course there are mobile terminals , tmux and other tools to mitigate it, but it's still a major pain.

If I'm going ultra-light, I carry a raspberry pi + bt keyboard . Otherwise a laptop is preferred.
What does AWS actually offer that is useful that isn't provided elsewhere?
>year of the Linux desktop

A tangent, and I realise this phrase is a meme, but it has always bothered me. Nobody has ever defined what year of the Linux desktop actually means, so it's a phrase without any real meaning.
Exactly, because Glove embeddings generate directly a linear space. This is, if I remember the paper, explicitly their objective. This corresponds to a single symmetrical relationship between two tokens, so a rather simple network embeddable into few dimensions without much loss.

And it has been shown time and time again that Glove embeddings work really well. The underlying relational structure is linear, as mentioned, so they are for example amendable to linear operations, aggregation etc.

By contrast, LLM embeddings are quite lossy as they somehow need to be created from an underlying non linear space.
For instance to represent a sentence from its tokens, it does not work ti just sum or mean. You need to train an extra aggregation model on top with new data that builds a good embedding space from the LLM activtions.

However, there is a limit to what Glove ans Word2Vec can represent. Simple things like polysemic words are already a limit etc. On a sequence level, especially for longer passages, LLM based sentence embeddings give you much more information if you meed it (insofar that relational semantics of a bag of words approach would not be sufficient)
I think more stock traders should be bond traders, or learn how that seemingly boring market works.

Too many people are stuck on technical analysis concepts from the 1980s because their first exposure was related to them.

The bond market is such a larger market than the entire stock market that its very easy to quantify the money flows out of the central banks, into that market and to other markets such as the stock market. How people are aiming to frontrun central bank behaviors.

Then it no longer matters if a PE ratio doesn't match your historical sector expectations, it no longer matters if an RSI is in overbought territority for longer than you thought. You dont have to rationalize your inadequate trades as “the market being irrational longer than you can remain solvent”, you can just make better trades understanding where the money is going, how it behaves.
Direct link to the court opinion:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca2.609...
Air Canada just announced today it's inreasing check-in cutoff time to 1hr - roughly meaning if you don't get to the counter at least 1hr early you're out of luck.

Not sure if it impacts those who travel without luggage and check-in online.

I contrast this to when I used to be able to (long ago) roll up to the airport a mere 20mins before takeoff time.
Yes, and it’s confusing to call that a “web IDE”, it’s not how that term is normally used and understood.
> decline in interest rates and corporate tax rates mechanically explain over 40 percent of the real growth

I interpret that as : "capitalists have taken over the control of our governments"...

Is that right ?
There is minimum amount of energy from falling down Earth’s gravity well. Earth escape velocity is 11 km/s. A big chunk of asteroid energy comes from Earth’s gravity.
> why aren't existing airplane manufacturers and airlines doing supersonic?

In my opinion it's because it's been tried already and no one, including Boom, has managed to figure out how to make it part of mass market air travel.

Boom Overture will be slower than Concorde, carry only 80 passengers, and will only be allowed to be supersonic away from land. The range is 4 250 nautical mile which is a little further than Concorde's 3 900. Perhaps that might be enough to tip the balance and make it profitable but it seems unlikely to me. Concorde carried between 90 and 120 passengers.

An Airbus A340-500 has a range of 9 000 nautical miles and carries at least 270 passengers so it carries three times as many passengers the same distance in only twice the time. Which surely makes it more economical. But in can also carry them twice as far before refuelling.

So it looks like Boom is only competing directly with Concorde and it's only selling points will be reduced fuel consumption and more comfort.

I dare say I've missed something because a lot of smart people seem to think it will work.
"The war after the next world war will be fought with sticks and stones" gains a new meaning. What would the sticks be though? Thor rods?
For all that we know, you're a ChatGPT bot? Maybe GPT4?

I don't see what that has to do with anything, and I don't see what that has to do with productive debate. Either you believe something written on the internet, or not. I really do not believe that anything I say or give evidence of (if that wasn't already incredibly illegal) will convince you.

I'm going to believe that you're a human, and as a consequence I think the only reason why you landed on this specific iteration of incredibly feeble epistemology-based argument is because any other argument you formulate comes out as "rape is good" in some way, and you realise that and want to avoid it.
Just wear a mask and talk
According to stories I heard, BA was able to turn a small profit on Concorde, but Air France never did(1). That was with each plane being given away for free (excuse me, 1 pound/franc each) subsidized by their governments. So with the prices that they charged (2) and free planes both airlines were close to break-even in operating costs. Presumably Boom is planning on charging more than 1 dollar for these planes, which means that the prices are going to have to be even higher than Concorde's were decades ago. And that means that people are going to have to justify it to their company even harder.

Believe me, I would love to have flown on one. I know a couple of guys who did, and it sounded really cool. But if the economic case doesn't close, then the only way they get sold is as toys for rich people, hoping to eventually trickle down to us mere mortals. Eventually. Maybe.

1: This is why after the crash AF decided to retire the Concorde, and going from having to pay half of the maintenance facility upkeep to paying all of it pushed BA from small profit into the red, hence BA following AF into retirement.

2: Which were high! Back as a teen in the 1990's I looked into it, hoping to talk my parents into flying one for a translant we were doing, and the cheapest ticket on a Concorde was like 3x more expensive than even 1st class on a 747. We flew steerage on a 747 instead.
Earlier submission: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41449120
Yeah, that's the normal thing to do. But it is crazy that Microsoft still won't just include the CRT as part of the OS, updated with Windows Update. You have to distribute the stupid thing yourself if you want the dynamic runtime.
Also worth mentioning in terms of mixing functional/imperative techniques: it can be very helpful to use languages (and frameworks, libraries, interfaces) which are functional-first/-by default, not necessarily pure but which provide specific affordances for managing side effects. This can be seen in languages like Clojure (with reference types distinct from most of the rest of the language/stdlib). It’s also a hallmark of many projects with a reactive paradigm (which in some form or another have dedicated APIs for isolating state and/or effects).

These aren’t strictly necessary for effectively using functional techniques in an imperative environment, but they can go a long way toward providing useful guardrails you don’t have to figure out yourself.
Is it just me or the camera man has Parkinson !?
Me after watching channel5 I think some of it should go to poor people instead of billion dollars roulettes only.
Thought the problem is with even richer corporations I feel and financial derivatives and not fully here.
Just straight up ban them. Have to pay taxes on investment due to dividends? Well too bad for you.
Short answer: Yes, and new instruments to make those measurements possible. That's how physics has always progressed. Why would this point in time be suddenly different from the past 400 years? Because we can't see a clear path forward? That's always been the case. Insight and ingenuity of individuals is what gets us through it every time.
It's really bad. I've never been able to keep a dell laptop asleep. If I don't shut it down completely before putting it into my bag, it will surely be too hot to touch when I pull it back out. Super frustrating when traveling.

Flabbergasting, that this issue has not been addressed.
This is not universally true, and it's pretty common to hear people who moved out to the suburbs hate it, but they needed the third or even second bedroom! Slightly larger condos simply didn't exist on the market, or were priced at astronomic rates (double the $/sqft compared to a 1bd unit).

Looked at a dozen midrise buildings this year across DC/Phila/NYC markets, some new/recent construction, some office conversions. Most buildings had zero 3bd units except for maybe a single penthouse, a 2bd unit every other floor, and the entire rest of the building evenly divided between studios and 1bd units in the 400-600sqft range. The competition for the 2bd units was unreal, in several cases people were offering the entire year's lease upfront, in cash, to secure an apartment.

It really is that competitive and the demand is there, the supply is not.
How dystopian.
Could it be argued that transformers are only possible because of Moore's law and the amount of processing power that could do these computations in a reasonable time? How complex is the transformer network really, every lay explanation I've seen basically says it is about a kind of parallelized access to the input string. Which sounds like a hardware problem, because the algorithmic advances still need to run on reasonable hardware.
> it’s hard to look at the world we live in today, with electric cars that can self drive and hand held devices connected to natural language comprehending oracles of knowledge, JIT industries end to end, starships to mars for colonization in mid to late stages, etc, and think “yep the only value is the value the federal reserve has created” as a federal reserve economist posits.

I agree that we're still producing new technology, but just because a certain technology is impressive doesn't mean it's going to yield a lot of value to investors or yield a lot of marginal improvement to productivity. Perhaps I'll be demonstrated wrong when we start mining asteroids and flooding the market with massive productivity shifts again, but there's not exactly any sign this is right around the corner. There's certainly no reason to assume growth as a market invariant just because of technological development has led to growth in the past.
>The core of Functional Programming is thinking about data-flow rather than control-flow

That's not right. The difference between data and control flow oriented programming is the difference between laziness and eagerness. The difference between imperative and functional programming is largely one of abstraction, not a feature in itself.

The genuine core feature of FP is the separation of data and methods, that stands in contrast not to imperative programming but object oriented programming, whose core feature is fusion of data and methods. Functional programming tries to address complexity by separation of concerns, pulling data and methods apart, OO tries to address complexity by encapsulation, pulling data and methods into purely local contexts.

This is also where the association between FP and static typing comes from that the post briefly mentions. Pulling data and functionality aside lends itself to programming in a global, sort of pipe based way where types act like a contract between different interacting parts, whereas the information hiding of OO lends itself to late binding and dynamic programming, taken to its most extreme version in say, Smalltalk.
It got me wondering why they don't do something akin to Microsoft's WSL which lets you run a persistent Linux VM in the background, but of course that would loosen Apples grip over the software ecosystem by letting users run arbitrary code from outside of the App Store. Heaven forbid people start making local Linux apps which spawn a web UI accessible through Safari. That's also why they will probably never do an iPad "Pro Mode" which boots into full blown macOS.
The problem with this theory is that by most metrics the middle class in America is doing very well. Homeownership rates are high (significantly higher than Europe), incomes are higher (again, median income in the US significantly higher than even wealthy European countries like Germany), and consumption of things like cars and other manufactured goods is higher than ever.
"Integration with Kagi’s legendary quality search results"
I don't disagree that this is useful, but I personally don't consider an assistant to be a chatbot that can tell me the weather. Assistants actively engage your daily life and do things that are usually considered tedious for people with a lack of time. Sure, that's a big ask for A.I in its current generation, but now for example I can ask Google Assistant (Gemini?) to save the shopping list I just gave it or even answer my calls in some cases. It's also certainly not the standard of human assistants, but it's closer than a chatbot.