skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes and appeal to whom? Himself, who’s clearly shown himself to be a partisan? Why even need an executive when your judiciary can basically unilaterally function as executive be a legislator in one? Obviously they’re is not the US, but that’s not an excuse to a ridiculous system.
"If there is a God, it appears He has an inordinate fondness for beetles."
Hey, really appreciate this user test. Like I mentioned in another comment, I would love to catch a chat with you if you're interested: tahmid(dot)hm(dot)dev(at)gmail.com. Thanks again for taking the time to make a video.
What do you mean "hardly important"? What about suddenly turning appreciation into deprecation? Will my friend banker pay me negative interest? :)
yes, but emojis with more complex meanings are the exceptions. The vast majority are pictograms (when considering the total number of emojis)
Pretty much all PDA's (even devices like the first gen Kindle) were using Intel's ARM chips. There is no reasons to believe that whatever Apple needed would somehow have been extremely different from what their other clients used (and it's not like Apple had that much bargaining power those days anyway).

> Intel was absolutely correct to recognize Apple's attempt to cuck them here.

I see it the other way around. Unless Intel somehow severely fucked it up (not a distinct possibility, just Intel being Intel) Apple would probably be stuck with their chips both on mobile and laptop/desktop to this day.
I think it's because the implication of any such question is how/why did they exclude.... It's like when you ask somebody, did you have a nice day? If they respond "yes" or "no", that's breaking the unstated rules of conversation.

And I would add that perceived competence does not preclude elementary solutions or problems. We're all humans, and humans are entirely prone to silliness, regardless of our credentials. NASA lost a near billion dollar Mars orbiter [1] because nobody, of the thousands of highly credentialed people that worked on that project, bothered to ask, 'Did anybody make sure that all components are using the same measurement system (metric vs customary), run a sim, or at least sanity check the data we're getting back?' Because surprisingly, the answer there would have been "no."

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Climate_Orbiter
I said there should be, not that there will be :)
I also really enjoyed the 800. That picture of Joust brings back memories.
Yeah that's a great idea.
What phone and software? Old libraries looked for the contrast of black-on-white (not white-on-black), but I thought that was a solved problem now.
yeah, i've seen plenty of rooster ornaments on houses, not so many turkeys or lizards
I love spreadsheets, but wouldn't this expose all the other responses collected so far to the person filling out the form?
That top logo is horrible and childish looking. The new logo will look dated soon, but at least it looks professional.

And 80k for a logo is incredibly cheap.
>"If I were rich then I wouldn't worry about taxes" vs after becoming rich, essentially everyone worries about taxes.

Consider that the type of people who are more inclined to accumulate wealth are the ones faced with this choice.

The people who'd rather strum guitars don't often find themselves in that position. So your observation is painfully anecdotal and not really useful.
The Internet grew faster than companies could 'secure' it, and I would say that was not just a good thing, but key to its success.
I always assume some people might define "thinking" as requiring "consciousness", because up until about 2022 pretty much every human on the planet did.
Besides the useful content, the article employs some clever interactive elements.
They can get rid of apps and block websites that they want, which is basically what they’re doing right now.
Wasn't there some paper recently that showed over training models, well beyond when it is normally halted, led them to create internal generalised models of a subject, e.g. arithmetic?

Essentially, the model internalised the core concepts of arithmetic. In that sense, the "reasoning" is pre baked into the model by training. Inference just plays things back through that space.

EDIT: as I recall, this is because understanding the concepts provides better compression than remembering lots of examples. It just takes a lot more training before it discovers them.
> There wasn't a world where Intel pays for an ARM architecture license, designs Apple's cores,

They had an ARM license and they had their own high-end cores that pretty much all PDAs used. In the early 2000s if you wanted a high-end ARM chip Intel was the default choice.

> We can argue for or against Intel acquiring an ARM license in an alternate reality, but truth is they don't care

Well as I said they already had one in our reality and could have easily ended up in the position Qualcomm is now if they played their cards right (well realistically in a better position because Qualcomm historically struggled keeping up with their own core designs and ended up switching to Cortex while Intel had a significant head start).
"However this culture of expecting Google to host the data then freeloading off it by blocking the tracking and ads is also a bit ugly."

"Freeloading" off a $2T company. Not really. What is really going on.

If Google was concerned about "freeloading" then they would not be encouraging people to store their data "in the cloud"; they would be encouraging them to store it on their own computers. Google wants people to upload data "for free" to Google servers. They design software and hardware to coerce people into uploading, e.g., "syncing".

It's not cool to invade peoples' privacy for profit. That is a social contract that has been broken.

Google could charge fees for storing peoples' data, these fees could cover the costs and allow for some profit, but then they would not be a $2T company. Only a relatively small number of people would pay. The Google customer is the advertiser not the uploader. Thus, this alleged "social contract" to allow Google to spy on people through their computer use, including surreptitiously sending data to Google, is motivated by greed.

That's the ugly culture.
The don't call it protest either.

They call it attack and invasion.

The reason why it isn't called a coup is be cause they failed.

And it's not the ministry of truth but multiple independent sources in and outside Brazil.

At a certain point something is obviously fake. And if it's spreading violence it reached the limit of free speech.
You are down voted by people who don't understand what the word censorship means. The problem is that the censors don't call it "censorship" anymore, for vanity reasons. Leading us into this dumb modern discourse. The same thing with the word "propaganda", that is misinterpreted to always mean something bad.

Each day the popular vocabulary shrinks more and more, until we're back at cave man levels. Tower of Babylon.
I'll certainly accept the possibility of bugs allowing remote takeover of vehicle cameras, but in general I don't think rear cameras are much of a risk to privacy. They're not always-on (generally they only turn on when the car is in reverse gear), and on many car models they're even physically covered when they're not active. (E.g. on my car, the manufacturer logo on the rear of the car flips up to allow the rear camera to "see" when I'm in reverse gear.)

Regarding bugs and remote takeover, the one thing that does feel like a mitigating factor is I expect for many car models it might be tough to find an exploit that enables the rear camera, but doesn't let the driver know that it's active. Usually when the rear camera is active, the infotainment display automatically switches to the rear view, and I wouldn't be surprised that there's no mode for "turn on rear camera but don't display the video feed to the driver" on most cars. Not as a security/privacy feature, but just because it's easier to write the code that links the two all the time rather than having it be conditional on something.

But yeah, as autonomous driving becomes more pervasive, there will be more cars with cameras recording everything around them at all times. I expect the manufacturers/operators of these cars to store that video for some time after capturing it, even just for quality control, bug tracking, and dispute resolution if there's a crash. And certainly law enforcement already has legal tools to compel the release of this kind of video.

I suppose this is just the next step of what's already the status quo, though. Many public places already have (stationary) cameras, either operated by the police or by private individuals, and police generally have the ability to access the latter, even. Cameras on autonomous vehicles just mean many more cameras over time, cameras that move around.

I don't really love this situation; I would like to see legislation that makes all of this data protected, and requires companies that store it to delete it after a relatively short amount of time (unless subject to a legal hold). But like most things, legal protections tend to lag behind technological progress.
He believes the woke mind virus is a threat because he has a trans kid.
> In 2006,

Problem is that they had already decided to get rid of XScale due to "reasons" by that point.
The VPN part was almost immediately overturned, but it is concerning that it was included in the first place
A totalitarian leader flagrantly violating his own country's constitution is now "the rules of a country" probably because the guy you dislike is associated with the other side.
> There's "cutting prices" and then there's selling BELOW COST,

Otellini himself later claimed that they miscalculated the cost regardless of volume.
Bluesky isn’t a centralized service, the developers cannot themselves comply with judicial orders (any of them).
Infomercial is one existing word for it.
Given what they did to hinder the opposition before the election I would say as free and fair as in Russia.
I realized from recent Anand Tech sunset article[1] that 'GPU' was coined by Nvidia way later than I expected -

>A lot of things have changed in the last quarter-century – in 1997 NVIDIA had yet to even coin the term “GPU”

[1] https://www.anandtech.com/show/21542/end-of-the-road-an-anan...
> You do not understand Brazilian rule of law at all.

Seems like the poster understands the law part fine, but not the rule part.
Because one set of orders doesn't follow the laws of its own country[1].

[1]: https://x.com/alexandrefiles/status/1829979981130416479
> Please stop. The moment you mentioned started mixing the Executive with the Judiciary ("has support of sitting president") it became clear you are not providing pure facts, but an opinion.

If you are going to post here, you need to engage in good faith. A five second search could have brought you to numerous articles quoting Lula where he supports Alexandre de Moraes’s actions and criticizes Musk. So yes, the executive and the judiciary are mixed because one is lending support publicly to the other. Those are the FACTS.

> The way I see this: the Supreme Court asked X to remove content and accounts that main purpose were to promote hate and aggression towards the electoral system and institutions

It doesn’t matter if accounts promote “hate and aggression towards the electoral system and institutions” (which just sounds like hyperbole for criticizing political processes) - that isn’t sufficient grounds for state enforced censorship in any free and democratic society. If you want to admit that Brazil has turned authoritarian, that’s one thing. But these convoluted narratives are wildly inaccurate and unconvincing.
> This is classic "big corporations are bad". Simply put, the internet would be dead if it were not for megacorporations as you call them, like Google, Microsoft, and Amazon.

Source?
Yes, but that's just an outcome of Intel's/Otellini incompetence (in that specific case) rather than anything else. He used bad data to make an (arguably) bad decision.
Funny thing is that he is poisoning his own well by making leftwing people , who are much more likely to drive an EV, abhor him and Tesla.

It’s not only happening in the US but has also started to happen in other countries like Australia.
You're in luck because the video is also available in the form of a research paper http://tom7.org/papers/murphy2022harder.pdf
I wrote a practical guide on how to train nanoGPT from scratch on Azure a while ago. It's pretty hands-on and easy to follow:

https://16x.engineer/2023/12/29/nanoGPT-azure-T4-ubuntu-guid...
No he is just rubbing them the wrong way. States, governments are control freaks. They make sure only their "disinformation" must be spread (public schooling, paid academia, controlled media). Rest will be muffled.bl Before musk Twitter was aligning with them, now not much.
That's also the only one that is in French.
Same here. Many terms in LLM world are not quite right such as prompt “engineering”. It is almost like they were coined by non-tech folks.
If you write something, you're not technically speaking. Freedom of expression covers more broadly.
i was really Hope someone rewrite dynarmic (https://github.com/yuzu-mirror/dynarmic) like that and write blog about it
You can also do that with png
https://stackoverflow.com/a/8499716/1595060
I just finished watching his purple gold video and he looked at, but didn't buy, the vacuum forge for that video.

I'd actually find it cool if he did a shorter video revisiting the purple gold with his additional experience and the new forge to see if he could manage to do it easily at this point.
I too still have and use a S10e, 4 years now. Battery is still the factory one, down to 79% real capacity (in Italy official replacement costs about 65€, probably I'll get one).
For me, it's still the best phone. Company gave me a Motorola Edge 50 Fusion that's good, probably a bit snappier, but much bigger, so for my stuff I'm sticking with the S10e.
For the first time I have no reason to upgrade but software updates, which is pity given the still good overall performance. I know I shouldn't for security reasons, but for now I'm keeping it until it's completely wore out.
Neural and Non-Neural AI, Reasoning, Transformers and LSTMs [Jürgen Schmidhuber] [video]
if they vote against a tax levy for a school they will most definitely vote to send the money elsewhere.

Empty nesters or childless people will funnel their tax money to things like parks, fire trucks, and other things.
Ask Microsofties: Any chance to open-source Visual Basic 1.0 for DOS?
Does it seem possible? VB1 for DOS would make a great addition to open-source MS-DOS and FreeDOS. There isn't a visual TUI builder like it that I know of. Maybe someone would even port it to modern systems.
I adore the Django ORM but as listed under cons... it makes it very hard to avoid accidental N+1 queries, and they don't seem interested in addressing this (https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/30874). Yes lazy loading is neat when you're messing around on the shell, but you should absolutely not be leaning on it in production at any kind of scale. So instead you have to use unit tests to hopefully catch any N+1 queries.
As of the beginning of 2023, jaywalking is no longer a thing in California. The only time a cop can cite you is if you're doing something dangerous. If it's safe for you to cross on a red light, or in the middle of a road not near an intersection, that's legally fine now.

Of course, the loophole is large enough to drive a truck through: if a cop wants to, they can decide you're walking "dangerously" as a pretense to hassle you. And most of the time it'll be the cop's word against yours as to whether or not you were being safe or not, and the courts will always side with the cops absent other evidence.

I always thought jaywalking laws were just stupid. The way I looked at it was always: my parents taught me when I was a kid to look both ways, and only cross if it's safe. To me, that suggests that I should always be allowed to cross if I determine it's safe, regardless of other considerations.

(The history of such laws are quite interesting and -- spoiler alert -- surprise, surprise, they were driven by automakers.)
Yeah you'll get people ranting about gell-mann amnesia while uncritically ignoring good reporting.
A bill cannot override constitutionally granted civil liberties. The penal code is secondary to the constitution. Regardless, no law was passed to give de Moraes the powers he now claims. He even literally said that his power comes from the electoral court that he was president of, not from a constitutional amendment or legislation. Do you think the judiciary should be able to grant itself powers arbitrarily? Does it make logical sense for De Moraes to serve on one court that grants himself powers in a different court?
I'm not talking about the 1800s. I'm talking about the 1920s-1970s

A three-day bus journey for a gay man moving to San Francisco or New York is not a big ask. But his parents aren't going to come visit or expect him to go back for Thanksgiving each year.
>But talking about a coup is not unconstitutional in many countries. For example in the US, seditious speech is protected.

Unless you were already part in an attempt than it's more likely you aren't just express your opinion but coordinate your next attempt over social media.

Free speech has limit. Just look at Charles Manson, he didn't kill anybody but he talked others into.

You wouldn't call Russian orders through Telegram free speech, would you?

The same entity behaves differently on the same issue but from different requester.

By your logic every complain about racism is whataboutism.

"Why got the black man jailed for drug possession but white man got probation?

"Whataboutism!!!"
Sebastian, you are a god among mortals. Thank you.
> So it seems like Apple was looking to build their own processors even before the iPhone became huge

So but possibly only because they had no alternatives. After all building your own chips is a huge long-term investment with all of risk. Intel fully committing to XSCale would probably have significantly altered that calculation.

> license the ARM architecture (unlike x86).

They still had to design their own cores which isn't cheap or straightforward. Something even Qualcomm struggled a lot with (and ended up failing at).
There's been a lot of reporting on Google getting worse, particularly in the Verge.
EmuDeck Machine – Retro Inspired ITX PC
This seems like the kind of fight the EFF would eventually get involved in.
And indeed, California no longer has strong jaywalking laws on the books. A cop can only cite you for jaywalking if you're crossing dangerously. Crossing on a red light, do-not-walk sign, or at a place where there isn't a crosswalk is no longer automatically considered jaywalking.
What would be the best way?
I feel lucky that doesn't bother me when watching his videos.

I can sympathize with you somewhat though, because the Food Wishes channel drives me insane for a similar reason. (Chef John has mentioned he speaks that way for his videos on purpose)
“Nearly”. I think it is in fact universal.
> What is this topic that's only in vogue in tech circles? Wokeism?

Wokeism as it pertains to social media's discussion of the woke mind virus. Everyone has an opinion on it. But it's not of practical relevance to most people, certainly not most voters. Sort of like modern art.
One of the core problems with plastic and their recycling is that plastic doesn't let itself recycle so easily due to the chemical composition. If you have the best recyclable material (e.g. PET), it will only recycle up to 3 to 4 times and even then new plastic is added to guarantee the quality of the recycled plastic. After that, the chemical composition is that much damaged you cannot use it anymore. The second problem is that with the collection of e.g. household recyclable waste, is that there are so many types of plastic in there, that sorting out the "good quality" plastics from the "bad quality" (Single Use Plastics) is a tedious and expensive process. Most of it will be sorted into 1 category, the category where it is used as fuel for energy production. It is burned.

More effective solutions are focussed on avoiding plastics as much as we can. One of the biggest areas to win is looking at the packaging of products.

What's wrong with plastic recycling:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HNWn885qWtU&pp=ygUgcGxhc3RpYyB...

The plastic recycling numbers in the EU:
https://circulareconomy.europa.eu/platform/sites/default/fil...
Lxml frees the GIL internally and iirc the motivation was something like concurrent reads of different portions of large documents.
Why are you asking me again when I’ve already stated my position?
Musk regularly censors speech on twitter based on his personal prerogatives, political and otherwise.

I'm not sure what he was asked to censor, but my guess is that it's content that aligns with his political agenda and that is why he is resisting.
> Apple was always going to own its own fabrication capabilities

I'm not sure that was a foregone conclusion back in 2005-2007. If anything Apple was forced to design their own chips because nobody else was able to offer what they wanted. M-series is a thing because Intel couldn't build the low-power/higher-performance CPUs that Apple wanted.
If you cannot appeal (and you probably can't, since this was a judicial order by the Supreme Court), then you have to comply (or face the consequences of ignoring judicial orders).

If the argument is that it is illegal to "censor", due to the Brazilian constitution, then Twitter is already engaging in illegal behaviour whenever it bans accounts (or auto-removes tweets) for using terms Musk dislikes (like "cis" or "cisgender").

I really don't buy the "free speech" argument here, since Twitter has never been an "absolute free speech" space to begin with. Note that Musk had no problem censoring and banning accounts when asked by the Turkish or Indian governments.
So in the turn of a few hours these new remarkable resources were published:

-- Sebastian Rashka's Building LLMs from the Ground Up: A 3-Hour Coding Workshop ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41412256 )

-- 3Blue1Brown's Chapter 7 in Deep Learning How Might LLMs store facts ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41412630 )

-- Jürgen Schmidhuber's interview Neural and Non-Neural AI, Reasoning, Transformers and LSTMs by Tim Scarfe (who seems to be doing quite a good job with his "Machine Learning Street Talk (MLST)" channel...)

It just happened... Erlang distribution.
USB-C is still mechanically inferior. Lightning feels better to use and lasts longer. It always clicks, it’s always snug, it lasts forever. I wish Apple wasn’t so greedy and made it an open standard. Maybe now we would have better connectors on all of our devices.
TurboTape for the C-64 and VIC-20
I do agree that he is hyper fixated on specific things like gender

but – I do think that there are elements of the “woke mind virus” that are okay with censorship. I don’t think that censorship has any place in a democracy, and I do think it is a problem we need to address.

The executive branch asked Twitter to ban a NY Post story on the grounds that it was misinformation when it wasn’t. It was “malinformation”: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malinformation

They didn’t correct the record, and Ro Khanna emailed Twitter to cut that shit out: https://www.businessinsider.com/khanna-emailed-twitter-free-...

I really don’t like Elon, but I fear the previous Twitter censors more. Media is supposed to keep the government in check and not the other way around.
ORMs do a great job at making easy things even easier and hard things a lot harder. If that sounds like a bad deal to you- it’s because it is!