That sounds like almost pure buzz-speak. Here's a more approachable try:

SyncLite is a tool for managing and synchronizing data between different systems. It allows you to copy and merge data from various sources — like desktop applications' and IoT devices' embedded databases — with a central database or data storage system in real time. Thanks to change data capture (CDC), SyncLite is particularly useful when you need to keep data up-to-date across multiple locations or devices, or when you want to consolidate data from many sources into a single place for analysis or machine learning — then sync that back to the edge.

On it's own, that's a much better intro, I think. But readers may have more questions, so here's sort of TL;DR takeaways from the rest of the README, aiming at "Why do I care?":

Here’s when SyncLite can be useful:

1. Real-Time Data Sync: If your application requires data from various sources (like local apps or sensors) to be updated continuously and in sync, SyncLite automates this process without needing to write a lot of custom code.

2. Data Consolidation: When you have multiple data streams—whether from embedded databases, IoT devices, or streaming data apps—and you need to bring them together into a central database or storage for analysis, SyncLite handles this consolidation efficiently.

3. Simplifying ETL and Migration: If you're migrating data between different databases or setting up ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) pipelines, SyncLite offers straightforward tools to manage these tasks, reducing the need for complex scripting or manual intervention.

4. IoT and Edge Data Integration: For applications involving IoT devices or edge computing, SyncLite makes it easier to capture and process data from many distributed devices, syncing it to central servers for processing or analysis.

5. Flexible Deployment: SyncLite can be set up in various environments, whether you prefer using Docker, traditional servers, or cloud services. This makes it adaptable to your existing infrastructure.

SyncLite's goal is a simple, scalable way to manage data synchronization and consolidation across different environments and data sources, aiming to reduce the need for custom development and provides tools to manage real-time data flows effectively.

As for the buzzword-laden take posted above, here's an attempt to unpack those against your longer form README that doesn't seem to fully justify all the buzzwords (I left out jargon that could be justified or mostly justified, even though it shouldn't have been jargon):

1. No-code: The documentation does not fully justify this claim. While it describes the platform as "no-code," the setup involves deploying servers, configuring data pipelines, and potentially writing scripts for integration. "No-code" would imply a more user-friendly interface without the need for configuration or scripting, which isn't the case here.

2. No-limits: The documentation does not provide evidence to support the "no-limits" claim. The platform seems robust, but every system has limitations related to scalability, performance, or specific use cases. The documentation doesn’t address any of these potential limitations, so this claim remains unsubstantiated.

3. Empowering developers: The documentation uses this phrase to market the tool but doesn't provide concrete examples or evidence of how it empowers developers in practice. It describes features that could make data management easier, but "empowering" is subjective and not directly substantiated with user testimonials or specific use case examples.

4. Rapidly build: The claim is somewhat justified but lacks specific examples or benchmarks to show how SyncLite speeds up development compared to other tools. The documentation touches on various features that could potentially reduce development time, but doesn’t quantify what or how it's more rapid.

5. Excels at performing real-time, transactional data replication and consolidation: This claim is partially justified. The documentation describes the real-time replication and consolidation capabilities but lacks performance metrics or comparisons to show how it "excels" over other similar tools. It would benefit from more specific examples or case studies demonstrating its effectiveness.

6. Enabling AI and ML use-cases: The claim is not fully justified. While the documentation mentions AI and ML, it does not provide specific examples or tools for these use cases, such as data preparation or model training features. This makes the claim feel more like a marketing angle to cynically claim applicability for AI/ML targeted funding, rather than a substantiated capability.

7. Edge, Fog, and Cloud: The documentation mentions deployment across these environments, but it doesn’t fully explain the differences or advantages in each case. The term "Fog" computing is less commonly understood, and the documentation does not provide enough detail to clarify this concept or its benefits within SyncLite.

By contrast, the revised intro for SyncLite clearly and concisely describes its core function — synchronizing and managing data across between various distributed systems and a core in real-time — while specifying practical use cases and benefits without jargon or overpromising.