skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In this case, the User deliberately changed the text of a fairly well-known riddle in order to “fool” the LLM. What you really are looking for is the right question: “A man and a son get into a car accident. They are rushed to the hospital and the boy requires surgery. The surgeon looks at the boy and says "I cannot perform surgery on him, he’s my son!". Why is this the case?”. In this corrected version, there is no statement that the man is a surgeon. If you read this correct version of the riddle, ChatGPT’s answer makes sense. The LLM was tricked because the majority of the text for the User prompt (modified riddle) is very close to the correct version which is prevalent across the internet (search the web for, “I can’t operate on him, he’s my son” and you’ll receive many hits with the full text of the correct riddle). I admit that when I first read the modified version of the riddle, I assumed it was the original after having seen it so many times before.

As an aside, this riddle is commonly used to demonstrate that people assume all doctors are male based on a stereotype. However, I think the reason many people stumble on the answer is related to the exceedingly low probability that a boy in a car accident would be rushed to a hospital where his own mother (or father) is the ER surgeon. The riddle also adds in the seemingly unnecessary statement by the doctor that she can’t operate on the boy because he is her son. Why not? Possibly she would not be in the right frame of mind due to the emotional attachment, but my expectation is that her fight-or-flight would kick in and she would perform the surgery to save her son’s life. It’s a red-herring in my opinion.
Something is broken on the site. Nothing happens no matter what I try. I've tried in chrome and firefox.
Oil springs to mind. Other things might include slow-growing hard woods.

Yes our technology allows for new mining techniques, and there are lots of reserves of some things, but ultimately it's all finite.
none of these have mmus, even the stm32g030 is a cortex-m0+
It’s a migratory bird that OP was able to generate faster than waiting for an artist commission, and cheaper, and likely better
From personal experience, the bank will drop you for having a relative with a name that happens to match someone on the "bad guy" list.
Cellar Door: a quest to find the most beautiful word in English
> I think you can script it out if you really need to.

That’s my understanding as well but I don’t bother. It’s so easy to just fire off keyboard commands that I end up with the same layout naturally.
Yeah but the “very clear speech” came later, after the decision was made. After redemption was possible. At that point you’re just reinforcing your perceptions. Your job as a manager is to manage that expectation. If you fire someone for it that’s your failure.
> that's because selective universities don't _want_ to give degrees through MOOCs at a lower cost as it 1) reduces the value of their degrees, and 2) reduces their reputation.

Huh? Many selective universities already make their educations free for many undergraduates.

The MOOCs charged money because they failed to solicit donations.

> Top universities could easily increase their student body 2x or 3x, bringing acceptance rate back up to 15%-20%.

This is true.

> Because what they're selling is not just an education (you can get that at (fill in blank) State)

The thing is, the best state institutions are operated like there are small elite academies within a larger, public body.
Sony is great at two things, marketing and sensor development. Their marketing is so great that everyone assumes they have 90% market share, where the reality is that Canon has approximately doubly Sony's market share.

Sony makes top notch sensors and fairly mediocre cameras, and sensor development is something that has been leapfrogged multiple times in history.

Nikon is the one that has a decent chance of dethroning Canon, unless canon ups their RF lens game.
Are you suggesting that advocating for changes to laws should be a crime?
Disclaimer: I worked a nuclear shop of ex-GE folks in the 90's.

It feeds an all-too-common techno-religious obsession rather than big-picture economic and risk management for specific projects in specific locations. One of the biggest hurdles and costliest aspects of proposing nuclear projects in the US is getting insurance first for construction and then operation, and the few insurers who can cover them aren't going to underwrite risky projects. It's so much simpler and cheaper to put up solar and wind nowadays that it doesn't make any sense compared to the past when renewables were very expensive. Renewables are the path of least resistance. Centralized and distributed grid storage in various forms then becomes a bonus feature that allows for more resiliency under load and unplanned outages.
As far as I get, the issue is aging infrastructure and the business is just moving elsewhere. A bit of creative destruction and in a decade or two those parts will be gentrified again because the necessary renovations will be cheap enough.
>We have enough space to give every human (not just every family - every individual human person) a large house on a big yard. This wouldn't even cover the earth - we could fit all that in just Ontario.

These kinds of calculations aren't very useful IMO, because they ignore the massive amount of overhead space needed to support a human life in a modern society: roads, train stations, airports (I guess not necessary if everyone lives in Ontario...), schools, water treatment plants, electric power generation facilities, farmland, commercial buildings, office buildings, warehouses, factories, landfills/garbage processing, the list goes on. Look at any modern city, including the dense & walkable ones: the amount of total space for housing, while significant, isn't that much of the total land area of the city, and that's ignoring all the stuff outside the city needed to make the city work (especially agricultural land, but also power generation, and other dirty industries that are either well outside cities, or on their periphery).

Also, at a very minimum, humans need food and water to survive. You're not going to grow enough food for your family in your yard (and certainly not year-round). And freshwater resources are scarce in many places. Ontario cannot grow crops year-round, and only has so much water.
Sovereign Tech Fund to Invest €686k in FreeBSD Infrastructure Modernization
I’d be lying if I said I understood the full ramifications of the following on the macro economy, but commercial real estate in general is, in my opinion, a completely non-functioning market. Every one of us has seen countless retail and office spaces which sit empty for years or decades at a time, even in cities where space is at an absolute premium. They are empty not because literally no one would like to rent the space, but because the investors who own those properties simply ignore the market signals telling them they are priced wrong. I think maybe it has something to do with their financial games that they play, where if they cut the asking rent buy 75% to actually fill the space then whoever holds the mortgage for the building will decide they’re insolvent and foreclose? Whereas if it sits empty for six years at an absurd asking rent, theoretically the building still has the value it used to have when it actually brought in that amount of rent?

Regardless of why it’s like this, I think I would prefer for the commercial real estate industry to die in a fire and return to system where prices are set according to supply and demand. Assuming that it wouldn’t cause a Great Depression, but it probably would.
> As much as people wish for this, people would hate living in apartments hastily carved from office towers.

There are no bad products, only bad prices.

Meanwhile availability of mildly undesirable but still livable apartments would lower rents overall through supply and demand, which benefits everybody except landlords.

> I’m actually not convinced though that there’s as much point in drastically expanding the amount of downtown housing stock, while simultaneously deprecating the idea of actually going to an office.

The current problem is that building towers in the suburbs is prohibited by law and there isn't a lot of suitable empty land, so your options are to build housing in the city where it's allowed or not at all. Now, if you can get the suburbs rezoned for taller buildings, go right ahead, but in the meantime people are willing to take what they can get.
Overview of the Stanford Creative Writing Lecturer Situation
Greek thinkers had many different interpretations of the mythology.

For example Euhemerus believed gods and myths originated from normal humans and historical events which through retellings and embellishments over time became more and more fantastical.
Or the cost of processing nuclear waste for 1,000s of years?
Incredible result! This is a tremendous amount of work and does seem like RV is at its limits in some of these cases. The bit gather and scatter instructions should become an extension!
Notes on Buttondown.com
Europeans didn't raise lots of kids in areas of dense small homes, that was happening outside the cities.
You can't make these large buildings without making lots of friends in local government, so the squeeze is on for 'revitalization' handouts.
Easy! My robots.txt blocks crawlers, all of them (I’m not interested in my data getting slurped up by AI VCs or playing the SEO game, duh.)

I can also plant some links to the blog on the clearnet before it exists.
"All their income" is very funny to hear when a small house in Prague costs 2 million dollars - now check what's the average income there.
I don't know about this particular power plant, but on new constructions all costs, including decommissioning and storage of waste, are included.
Sure! Unfortunately I am not sure I’ve ever seen the api used for anything other than what I’d call spam. To the point where as soon as I’m prompted I’m finding that “block” button before even speculating what it’s supposedly for.
> As much as people wish for this, people would hate living in apartments hastily carved from office towers.

only if they carve out many apartments on one floor.

Imagine living in a large apartment that occupies the entire floor (or half of it). Surely that would attract monied tenants.
un-paywalled at https://archive.is/QvKYJ
I really enjoyed this article.
The one point I have issue with is that the dominance of object storage in today's distributed systems is very much due to economics, not technology. There's basically cheering every little step S3 takes towards a POSIX-like distributed file system like HDFS - "consistent listing of files, yeah!". Last week it was preconditions for writing files. There's still huge gymnastics needed in Iceberg/Delta to work with S3 given the lack of atomic rename.
In my case spawn overhead is negligible relative to the jobs themselves, my existing experience with AWS Batch has been pretty good. I took another look at the Dokku documentation and extending `run:detached` would work well enough, though maybe it's time for me to revisit Airflow or something in that direction.
Even though it’s been a long time, I feel compelled to point out that I was only decent at floats, I was never good at it. LOL
Not directed at you; it was recalling how MAA noted that the reward for being at the very top of a hierarchy is getting to spend your waking hours in the company of the sorts of people who get near the top of hierarchies: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38930334
Complicity accusations seem to be a stretch. I am not sure if it is the same in French law but according to Wikipedia:

> For two persons to be complicit in a crime that does not involve negligence, they must share the same criminal intent; "there must be a community of purpose, partnership in the unlawful undertaking".
Ask HN: Why Is Stack Overflow Fading Away?
Stack Overflow has been a cornerstone of developer communities for years, but recently, it seems to be losing its prominence. I’m curious about your thoughts on why this might be happening and what the future holds for this platform. Is it just AI
or there're specific issues contributing to its decline?
60 Hz display is a bad case to begin with. How visible it is let's say on 180 Hz one?

Though ideally, may be display should use adaptive sync to the player rather than the player trying to hack around the video to display?
I hope they're able to get this ISA-level feedback to people at RVI
can you explain? I tried looking it up but I didn't quite understand how it is called SD-WAN.
At least in case of Section 230, distributirs that do not moderate do not need it because they do indeed have that kind of legal protection - see Cubby v. CompuServe for an example. Section 230 was created because a provider that did moderate tried to use this precedent in court and its applicability was rejected, and Congress decided that this state of affairs incentivized the wrong kind of behavior.

This is precisely why Republicans want to repeal it - if they succeed, it would effectively force Facebook etc to allow any content.
You keep good company: the French government continues to shelter the actually convicted sexual predator, Roman Polanski, and sheltered Iran's first Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khomeini.
Generally I agree with you. A lot of my comments to rent and property value has been that pretty much any fund in listed property trusts either has done, or should do a massive write-down to book value.

The unwillingness to own the decline in value is also one of the reasons viable shop fronts stay empty: The terms of the commercial loan are tied very strongly to value imputed by rent, even un-earned. if you list it cheaper, it's worth less than you said when you borrowed against it.

My point of divergence is that to the extent everyone has superannuation, company pension, non-government future retirement investment, some of it will be tied up in LPT. The Canadian government pension fund, My university sector pension fund here in Australia, the UK pension fund, they all have a component of this, and they have exposure to this worldwide. Thus, the "whining" is not really confined to just commercial real estate industry: My future self is looking at my net worth wondering how long it takes to come back from the write down.

But, write it down we must do.
There is this amazing tool called difftastic. I've been using it for years with git and it works like a charm. [1] [2]

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27768861

[2] https://github.com/Wilfred/difftastic
Of course, they only know how to build a single vertical layout. They’re used to building apps or sites aimed at smartphones, which are the only devices, right?
[2] Nomenclature binomiale

(compare the "biped, featherless — with broad nails")
This is such a neat site, thanks for sharing.

I wanted to use a word that I figured would be rarely seen in Brooklyn, so I tried: “Gripe”

The correct identifications center around “Vacuna de la gripe” (flu vaccine).

The remainder are all mismatches, such as “Grape” at a very sharp angle. Funnily, the majority of the mislabeled samples are all due to the “Good Grips” brand logo. This logo has a small underlined “s” at the end that looks like a “E” when you squint at the JPEG. I’ll give the OCR model a pass on this one!
If you have to use Windows and want maximum configuration, try Microsoft PowerToys.
Opioids are not hallucinogens? They certainly are.

Anyone who has been a caregiver to someone with prescription opioids can confirm.
I'm assuming maximum good faith here but this only seems interesting/contradictory because you haven't defined the system rigorously. All the seeming contradictions are coming from the fact that you are applying Euclidian geometric constructions to set theory via this example involving covering things up with actual pieces of paper.

The parallel postulate doesn't deal with pieces of paper. It deals with lines in Euclidian space. These spaces have infinite dimension, and the lines have infinite length, so the very first deduction you are attempting to draw (about "half the logic" being represented) is literally meaningless. If you take an infinite Euclidian space and partition it into two halves with a line, they are each infinite in size. A Venn diagram is not a Euclidian concept, it is a diagramatic representation of set membership. So you can't say anything about logic purely from the idea you can partition a space in half.

Your next paragraph about the logic of camouflage is also meaningless for the exact same reason.

The section about an object on one side or the other of the line is simply a category error. If we have an object with non-zero area and a line in a Euclidian space then the object can be on either side of the line or the line can intersect with the object. Nothing about this changes the position of the object or the line and your "paper" construction simply adds some confusion to a very simple geometric system. If you're actually dealing not with a Euclidian space but with set membership then it's best to abandon this paper/line construction and just talk about set membership. If you have an object and two sets, the object can be in either set, both or neither. This is not a contradiction and the object has no "position" in this system. It's simply a question of definition. If you want to learn how set theory works I recommend you read Naive Set Theory by Paul Halmos.

The final paragraph is meaningless because all the things before are meaningless. If we're talking about Euclidian spaces these have nothing to say about logic (modified or otherwise) and if you are talking about sets then the parallel postulate is irrelevant because it is a geometric concept. I understand the Dedekind construction etc and really don't follow what you're saying about the parallel postulate being a statement about Cauchy completeness. From the fact that the coordinates of a point fully represent that point, the existance of lines in a Cartesian space (not the parallel postulate) is a statement about Cauchy completeness. That said, nothing you've put here affects the construction of numbers in any way.

If you want any of this to be actual mathematics you need to abandon your "paper" construction and define things properly.
Dual authentication is common in the defense space.
What important Hubspot integration is missing here?
It’s surprising to me that someone could know what a for loop is but not summation notation. Is summation notation not taught in school?

You have to learn about summation before you learn calculus, because any definition of integration requires series.
Because people generally want features like persistent chat history across all devices to "just work".
You can totally trip on morphine.
I'm sure there are lots of reasons, but for me it's that so many posts are outdated by now that the gamble isn't worth it. Search results from Google often point me in a more efficient direction.
Seems quite ridiculous to not just release a free version with no support, no updates, no DRM. It's like they're going out of their way to destroy their legacy. I'd hate to be one of the devs.
"East Loop" threw me for a loop too. I was wondering whether anyone would mention that exact thing. I don't think the author was even sure of their use of it, as they pivoted to "Central Loop", which was also a little perplexing.
If you don’t mind me asking, what is your role in particular? Are you a module engineer, a metrology engineer or are you in design enablement? Also, is Intel Foundry currently hiring given all the cuts and layoffs? I hope your job is safe amid all the turmoil!
It's really hard. Nothing like "most" of the stocks are viable, they are expensive conversions, and it turns out few people with choices want the outcome because of the problems which follow: to get volume you get few windows per unit-housing. Ceilings are low, and the office design put all the water and waste close to the lift core so the design of a modern home with en-suites &c is hard.

I do think the massive homeless problem in my economy (Australia) should drive to doing this conversion, but everything I read about it over the last 2-3 years said it was nothing like as simple as people thought.

I begin to think knocking them down like we see footage of in China may be the best option. Or, paying socialised costs to convert into public housing but at a significant premium compared to green field.
Consider folks already know a bunch of other input.
RP5 with CM5?
None of this is new. None of it.

In fact, bitfield extract is such an obvious oversight that it is my favourite example of how idiotic the RISCV ISA is (#2 is lack of sane addressing modes).

Some of the better RISCV designs, in fact, implement a custom instr to do this, eg: BEXTM in Hazard3: https://github.com/Wren6991/Hazard3/blob/stable/doc/hazard3....
ETH Zurich Computer Architecture Lecture Playlist
I didn't know edx was bought by a company that went on to go bankrupt. I have two courses on edx that I consider exceptional, and worry I might lose access to them.

What are your thoughts on that?
> I think maybe it has something to do with their financial games that they play, where if they cut the asking rent buy 75% to actually fill the space then whoever holds the mortgage for the building will decide they’re insolvent and foreclose?

A lot of this was low interest rates. Appreciation on the building, especially given artificial scarcity from captured zoning boards, meant you could make more than the interest on the loan just through increases in the price of the building without even renting it out. So they were asking crazy rents because if they could actually get someone to pay that it's pure profit and if not they're still making money.

Now interest rates are higher and that doesn't work so well so the result should be a drastic decline in rental prices, but people are holding out in the hope that the fed is going to drop rates to zero again. Which would be stupid.

> Assuming that it wouldn’t cause a Great Depression, but it probably would.

Nah, we just "fixed it" the wrong way in 2008. We lowered interest rates so people would borrow money (bank loans create new money) and reinflated the housing bubble. But a bubble is bad.

So what you do is you let it pop. This causes deflation, which is generally bad. But uh, maybe not actually so bad right now. And if there was too much deflation, that's all too easy to fix -- it intrinsically allows you to print money and send out stimulus checks, because in that case inflation to counteract the deflation is what you want. And since you don't need to buy a house to get a stimulus check, that stabilizes the overall economy instead of re-overheating the housing market like we did last time.
> Tell that to Google...

Yeah, because Google's LLMs have an completely open question/answer space.

For e.g. a Kubernetes AI, you can nowadays just feed in the whole Kubernetes docs + a few reference Helm charts, tell it to stick close to the material, and you'll have next to no hallucinations. Same thing for simple data extraction tasks, where in the past you couldn't use LLMs because they would just hallucinate data into the output that wasn't there in the input (e.g. completely mangling an ID), which nowadays is essentially a non-issue.

As soon as you have a restrictable space in which the LLM acts, you have a lot of options to tune them that hallucinations are not a major issue nowadays.
This might go into hands of insurance companies who will decide to not insure areas where Earth Quake is likely to hit and could also do some more forecasting to avoid further regions.
It has happened in the NBA before: https://www.basketballnetwork.net/old-school/the-only-nba-pl...
I once had a bash script to produce such horizontal spark lines from numeric input, but I forgot it's name. Anyone remembers it? From about the same time.
As described here: https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Sparkline_in_unicode