skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> […] Bernstein's rejection of that result.

Some previous discussion on this from 2022 and 2023:

* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32360533

* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37756656
OSX-KVM may be next. I know it contains many copies of the "pleasedontsteal" key and it used to have direct downloads for full OSX images, but that was wiped from the repo years ago (multiple forks still have it though).
The "PoE"[0] board was also a USB device wired onto the pins for the single USB port on the board. USB is not a multidrop bus - if you directly wire two devices to a single USB port it will not work, you need an active USB hub.

[0]quotes because looking at that FTDI chip though my bet is it's actually serial over Cat5...
As if that’s what would happen with the extra revenue.
Colour blind doesn't mean someone sees in black and white. It means they have difficulty differentiating between two colours. Often red / green, but not always.
Isn't this the same syntax (or very similar to) Apache Beam?
One fun detail - I don't know any Typescript nor have I ever coded a VSCode extension before, so this was all made going back and forth with Sonnet 3.5 + digging through the VSCode repo to figure out how their new proposed shell integration API works.
They suspended Tim Peters? That is insane.
I'm still waiting for promised long time ago mixing of files and directories in the search results..
> Yeah I'd wait for her to specifically say that before you sell your unrealized gains in a panic and flee the country. The self martyrdom thing is super weird imo.

Welp. Kamala Harris' economic advisor confirmed the plan to tax unrealized gains on CNBC Squawk Box. There goes her full tilt to Socialism. Communism is next in line.
I used to use Window Maker all the time on Slackware. It was wicked fast, barebones, reliable, configurable. I just noticed it's packaged for Alpine (my current distro), I'll have to revisit it
Example Zero DTE Options SPX Iron Butterfly Trade
Yes, this is hacker news. But lots of investor types here. Also this strategy is completely automated using some pretty slick golang code.

Ask me anything about the trade or code......
I'm pretty sure that's not where the line is drawn, legally. Humans look at the produced image and use their judgement to decide if it is substantially similar to the original. Whether or not a computer was used as part of the transformation is not relevant.
> Machines with no agency cannot infringe copyright. If I took a photo of a page of a book with my iPhone, and the iPhone did image to text on it, that's not the iPhone's fault. And I would possibly be within my rights to take that photo. I would be infringing if I then published that image or the text that the iPhone generated.

> I believe / have the understanding that copyright can only be violated by an entity with agency - and some entity with agency is the one that ends up publishing or redistributing the work.

The big problem with this argument is that the machine is not publishing things, OpenAI the company is. They have created the entire circumstances around which this copying can happen.

Let's consider the Napster case. If the argument is "software can't violate copyright" then what was the RIAA's problem with a mass-scale copying and sharing of their music? Why was Napster able to be sued into nonexistence? They only created the software, after all.

There's precedent here that creators of software can be held liable for the copyright abuses that software leads to or permits.

> It is the responsibility of the distributor to comply with the license.

By all measures, OpenAI is the distributor of the code here. After all, their software is outputting licensed code.
Yes, I've heard this sales pitch before. Yes, I used an actual REPL tied to an editor, among other configurations. I found it rather underwhelming. I tried a few other lisp dialects as well, but had the same experience. Interactivity is great, but it doesn't make up for the language itself.
I've taken apart a Toughbook to try to resurrect a dead hard drive. It was the most brutally annoying laptops I've ever had to tear apart.

I have SO much respect for those machines, but if it's being sold without a HDD, be prepared for some pain getting it open and then back together again.
Yall are awesome. Thank you
I don’t have a product to promote—I'm just here to hold myself accountable. I'm taking one final shot: a 6-month journey to build and launch my first mobile app while also committing to regular gym workouts and improving my sleep and eating habits. Struggling with chronic anxiety and depression, I was inspired by Tom Brady’s words, “Even on your worst days, you should try—that’s what sets people apart.” I’m determined to give it a genuine effort for the next 6 months. This is a make-or-break moment in my life—let’s see how it goes.
BSD was the Unix distribution; BSD and Postgres/Ingres development did overlap at UC Berkeley.
/rant hope we also get some sane pricing RAM baseline increase for mactops...
We should really standardize a core language for SQL. Rust has MIR, Clang is making a CIR for C/C++. Once we have that, we'll be able to to communicate much better.

Right now, it's everyone faffing around with different mental models and ugly single pass compilers (my understanding is that parsing-->query planning is not nearly as well-separated in most DBs as parsing-->optomize-->codegen in most compilers).
> Is there a "fair use" defense to contract liability.

NAL, but in common law jurisdictions and maybe others there can be various implicit terms to any contract, like fair dealing.

Also if you can literally claim fair use, unless you signed a contract waiving that right (if that's even possible), it doesn't matter.

Heck, most software licensing in the USA is purporting to grant you rights that you already have from the Copyright Act. That's right, in US law you own the authorized copy you receive. The license claiming that you don't is questionable at best. To be fair the courts somehow have managed to become divided on this, but the plain language of the law itself is crystal clear, explicitly granting the right to make additional copies as necessary for execution.

Also that hardly matters when the fake license can still be "enforced" via lawfare. Most everyone is going to choose to pay up rather than fight a protracted legal battle against Microsoft.
Privatization doesn't fix that; the state just ends up continuing to chuck money every time the companies (who are now in charge of critical infrastructure, and thus can't be allowed to fail) cry poor. It ends up being less efficient with a bunch of extra money flowing to the private sector. At least this is the Australian experience.
You can’t have nice things if you don’t have nice people. In Germany busses often use an honor system: https://www.german-way.com/travel-and-tourism/public-transpo....

Half of riders evading bus fare is third-world country levels of dysfunction. How does a developed country get to that point? And is it even possible to get things back on track? I imagine you could institute harsh punishments for fare evaders, but if you need to do that, you’ve already lost. You can’t beat orderliness into people.
When Wireguard first came out I wrote some scripts for myself. Later on I used SaltStack to configure Wireguard for customers with sets of laptops in the dozens or more.

https://Netbird.io is probably something you may be interested in.
Most if not all NYC busses have tap to pay now, so yes, they could tap and pay. Tracking phones that aren't paying might cause issues though.
Two had small youtube channels delving into details of ML papers, one had a blog with a good explanation of a specific detail on a paper I was interested, one was a recommendation by my graduate advisor (I keep in touch with the university I graduated from a thousand years ago). The undergrad had a fantastic comment on a thread somewhere, I think in Kaggle.
As a new user of OpenTofu, I find this disheartening. But if I try to put myself in the shoes of "the Ukranian dev", I can understand it.

Then I think about the United States' past (and present) wars of aggression overseas, and I can only imagine what a bad reputation american citizens must have all over the world. I'm sure many strangers must hate my guts without knowing me at all, and they have good reason for it.

But ultimately I think that pull/817 is discriminatory against a group of people, and therefor in violation of Github's TOS.

I hope OpenTofu's core devs can have a change of heart. And as hard as it might be, I hope "the Ukrainian dev" can have one too.

And who knows, maybe even Putin himself will be capable of a change of heart.
Sidewalks, as with trains, require construction and maintenance.

An extra walker a day on a sidewalk costs the same marginal $0 or so an extra rider on the trains does. Both are expensive to run on large scale.
Brazil top court threatens to suspend X within 24 hours
Do be careful with iText products—they license their stuff under AGPL but their interpretation of AGPL is pretty extreme. If you talk to their team they'll tell you that ~everything your company makes should be AGPL-licensed if you use iText anywhere [0]:

> You may not deploy it on a network without disclosing the full source code of your own applications under the AGPL license. You must distribute all source code, including your own product and web-based applications.

They also have this delightful nagware encoded as a base64 string that spits this out in your logs [1]:

> You are using iText under the AGPL.

> If this is your intention, you have published your own source code as AGPL software too.
Please let us know where to find your source code by sending a mail to agpl@apryse.com
We'd be honored to add it to our list of AGPL projects built on top of iText
and we'll explain how to remove this message from your error logs.

> If this wasn't your intention, you are probably using iText in a non-free environment.
In this case, please contact us by filling out this form: http://itextpdf.com/sales
If you are a customer, we'll explain how to install your license key to avoid this message.
If you're not a customer, we'll explain the benefits of becoming a customer.

For using RUPS on a local computer you're probably safe, but I avoid the company because everything about their approach to the AGPL suggests that they chose it as a marketing technique for their paid products (with an extremely strong desire that it never be used commercially without pay), not out of a serious commitment to free software.

[0] https://itextpdf.com/how-buy/AGPLv3-license

[1] https://github.com/itext/itext-dotnet/blob/develop/itext/ite...
Aug28: I registered for the gym. A lot of amazing people here looked out of place but that’s fine. I guess

Bought protein shakes. But ordered some Popeyes bad choice but it’s ok
I don’t remember much about the work - it was just a quick and dirty app to help me debug PDF for my ReportMill work (10 years ago). I remember thinking there probably weren’t more than 100 people on the planet who would even care about it.
Did that have anything to do with the cancellation of congestion pricing? I heard that was supposed to generate $16 billion through 2030 for the MTA.
NYC parks budget is like $600m, it must cost something to maintain?
I think maybe you are using the word "tampered" in an unusual way? To mean unsafe?
Odd choice of example, and I really have to disagree on sherlocking.

First, why the example is odd / poor imo

Adobe trying to maintain as close to a monopoly as it can on a file format in order to have more control and (at least hoping to) generate more revenue through that control... threatening legal action to maintain their control? It's not a strong argument to say it's people being mad about microsoft's own monopolism, rather it just speaks to how corporations acting with hostility via formal legalistic channels harms attempts to use an at the time proprietary file format. It's actually in fact a counter argument to what you wrote.

As for my stronger feeling against your sherlocking point, I'd note that generally people aren't mad about sherlocking because someone else does something good and it should only ever be done once ever by one person or group in history.

Rather, such anger is usually stemming from when it's perceived as a deliberate undercutting or lazy copying. When some person or group was far more innovative or did far more difficult initial design work, only to now have been so undercut without recompense by uncaring predators lying in wait.

A great example being video game modding. People are rarely mad if one game is simply implementing its own version of a feature popular in mods or another game.

Far more often are they angry because a modder's unique and beloved system just got lifted 1:1, or clearly was irrelevant and had no reason to be added to the base game even if it's popular, and yet they're not even cited as an inspiration or hired/paid/etc. by the company that obviously felt it greatly improves the value of the game.
The walrus operator doesn’t seem like such a big deal now given these developments, and no doubt future developments of the same sort. The permanently offended aren’t going to just go until everything is in ruins and all the main contributors are gone.
Some groups like restaurant employees don't get minimum wage. Also almost 40% of people have no job.
I'm fairly convinced that the arrest of Pavel Durov on content-moderation related issues is actually an attempt by a NATO state at securing information about adversaries, as it's the most used messaging app by Russian forces in Ukraine. Apparently the Wagner Group had developed their own messaging client, ostensibly for this reason.
Because USB is not a multi-tap network. It's a point-to-point between host and peripheral, or host and host pretending to be a peripheral (OTG mode).

That USB dongle was bodged on to the USB port D+/D- pins going to the tablet's SOC. If you then connect a PC to that port, you have two hosts (SOC & PC), and one peripheral on the same pair of data lines. No bueno.

I can't believe the bodge job inside that tablet. It looks like the prototype became the final product.
I pay for one which was easier for me at this time
Not OP, but stating that "ban for merely mentioning an un-person" is nuts looks like a positive contribution to me. Policies like this often stand because no one openly disagrees and no one openly disagrees because no one else does so you just assume everyone is OK with it. Until a child blurts out that the king is naked.

> Why do you want to stick your opinion into something that you hadn't previously known about? What are you going to positively contribute to the discussion that will move things forward? How does that help?

A prudent response, the revised ending of "The Emperor's New Clothes".
Well that's getting a bookmark!

We had an Advantage Air system installed last year, and the cheap, low-powered nature of the tablet was immediately obvious. Nice to know it can fairly easily be replaced with any old device or phone as and when it craps out.
This is the primary impediment to my large org at $work using llm-based coding tools: potential accidentally duplicated source code and the legal implications (including the risk of a viral copyleft license easter egg).
Ahh yes, that's right. I can live here and get to have no opinion of any value whatsoever on what surrounds me.

It's hilarious in a kind of tragic way, how Americans continually tell me things are impossible or can't possibly work the way that other countries manage to make them work.

No, no, it's everyone else that's wrong.
Even Sweden and Denmark have bus fare. If half the people are evading bus fare, then that’s a problem that needs to be fixed regardless of anything else you might do. It’s not likely that the people jumping the turnstiles are orderly and polite riders who help keep the system clean. You’ll just end up taxing everyone to create a system that’s unpleasant for normal people to use, which will destroy public support for those taxes.

Toxic empathy, ironically, is antithetical to building functioning transit systems. To get buy-in from the public to direct tax dollars to transit, you need to have pleasant, orderly, clean systems that people who can afford to drive want to use instead of driving. You can’t get that if half your riders are law breakers.
Strange, I use Lisp and type to a REPL all the time. Now you tell me that is a feature of other languages, not of Lisp?
It’s due to poor choices made in the implementation of pdfTeX. For example the TeX engine does not associate the original space characters with the inter-word “glue” that replaces them, so pdfTeX happily omits them. This was fixed a few years back, finally. But there’s millions(?) of papers out there with no spaces.
It did have some of the worst code in open source. We didn't need to abandon the protocol, ABI & backwards compatibility (fuck Wayland sideways a broom) but a rewrite was sorely needed
Reaffirming my belief that I want nothing “smart” controlling critical infrastructure in my home. What if it were dead of winter, would he have been able to control the heat?
Slaves is such a nasty word. Prisoners with jobs.
The rebuttal to Scrooge involved a heavy reliance on divine intervention, ghosts and threats of eternal damnation in hell wrapped in heavy chains. While rhetorically powerful, I'm disputing that Dickens' opinions are the most thoughtful approach to direct social policy.

As a starting point to benefiting from society there is a reasonable expectation that people put a couple of hours a day into making life better for others. Prisoners can achieve that lofty goal. So can people travelling on the NY Metro without paying. There is a lot of room to haggle over the details, but argument from chubby ghost of Christmas present is not really the path to a good compromise.
> Pro Max currently accounts for nearly 40% of new model shipments

As an iPhone mini lover, this stat blows my mind.
> ... closed-loop feedback systems ...

It's good to actually see even a mention of control theory.

My degree was electronics and control theory and whilst I've only had one job that involved either electronics or control theory I often think about software in these terms: I genuinely think that as an industry we need to seriously consider the systems we build in control theoretic terms.
What a small world. Earlier today I got tagged in a PR [1] where Andrew became the maintainer of a Ruby gem related to database migrations. Good to know he is involved in multiple projects in this space.

[1] https://github.com/lfittl/activerecord-clean-db-structure/is...
This is when smart gets stupid. I'm a bit worried about this with my nest and other smart devices, but even with normal air conditioners there are a few stupid simple problems that will cost you hundreds of dollars!

A couple of weeks ago my AC blower fan stopped working, the compressor would run. I went up and found out that the capacitor was bad, and took a picture of it, buying a replacement. Took about 15 minutes to replace and I probably saved myself at least $400 (no AC is an emergency in the desert, and they will charge you accordingly).

Fixing household appliances can be fun too!
It's unlikely that the company itself makes these tablets, they probably buy bulk off Alibaba or something and they all probably fail at the same time because the were all made at the same time.

The real problem is that the quoted replacement price is so high, given that we know the tablets themselves are like $30 each.
> The original ezone tablet had been running Android 6.0, this Samsung was still on 5.0 but I didnt think that would cause any issues so I got started on doing what was clearly missing: The required apps. All ezone apps are available both on the Advantage Air website and the apkpure site. I only learned of the apkpure site from a post claiming he had been directed to it by a AA tech support person.

Redirecting your customers to a third-party/pirate APK redistributor of unknown authenticity... reality defies parody.
Even without tapping, I mean. You’re within a few feet of one of those sensors for more than a minute? Thanks for your purchase (if you have credit, or a card tied to the system).

And if you don’t, it’s one line on your record, just like you were speeding or peeing on the streets. I’m not against treating buses as something we pay with taxes. But as long as we are required to buy a bus ticket, I think we should track those who don’t.
$60/month is not a lot to you.

$60/month is not a lot to me.

$60/month can be an infinite amount of money if you are poor, which I have been.
The concern with slavery is the innocence of victim. When that’s removed, it’s no longer controversial. At least it shouldn’t be.
They usually just don't insist that strongly because they'd rather not get into a confrontation, as not moving might also anger people other than just the one you're holding for (as an argument I once saw happen on a bus went after a driver insisted, "the money isn't coming out of your paycheck so why do you care?").

Previously the consideration used to be nice because it was possible to end up in a situation where your metrocard was too low on balance, too far away from a machine to add more money to it, and you didn't have change. But nowadays most busses have tap-to-pay, so there shouldn't be many excuses.
We must have an open-source policy for hardware like this. Billions if not trillions of dollars are being wasted every year because of these shitty companies. I know I am dreaming but maybe in 100 years, humanity will evolve.
Same way insurance companies insure satellite launches. Lots of guesses and getting another insurance company to underwrite their insurance deals.
There's a community, just too busy with the actual programming.
I think "begging the question" describes your answer, in the classical sense of "assuming what you need to prove."

You are assuming that a multi-party, multi-candidate election is a desirable norm. But that needs to be proven by you, not assumed.

In a pre-RCV system, the parties would choose their candidates, however they do it, and then the general election would pit one candidate of each party against each other, plus whatever other parties qualify for the ballot. The public has not accepted that that must be eliminated. It did make things hard for third parties, but so it goes. Prove that that's a bad thing.
Thanks, we are on the same page.
I assume that doesn't apply to source code?

It seems somewhat absurd to suggest, but it's less absurd if a defense company provided binaries and then suddenly goes out of business.
IANAL?
That's not true in NYC, food service workers have a minimum wage of $15. other groups you're thinking of also have minimum wages (i.e. door dash drivers)

the labor force participation percentage is a slight of hand. You're including children (who receive free metro cards), retirees (including social security beneficiaries, pensions), and people who might just be rich. 40% has nothing to do with people's ability to make or have money.
+1. Repair all sorts of stuff... Capresso burr grinder, little plastic knob broke off inside, repaired with a 10c washer and glue... worked great for years and you'd never know...
> We have a two-party system, and that's just the way it is.

Some argue that our current voting system creates the two party system we all know and hate. Derek from Veritasium did a video about this the other day. Really good stuff.

No need to come to Palin's or the Republican's defense here. Candidates are more than capable of trying to campaign for the second place votes.
Try not paying and see if that's an experience you'd prefer to pay to avoid.
Unfortunately, if/when someone from the manufacturer knows about it their first thought will not be "How do we make it easier for our customers".

It will most likely be "How do we restrict this hack" and will eventually get into more restricted/quirky hardware & software.
Bleh you're right. I meant the 70B model. I think there's some other context where the number 200 makes sense. Thanks for the correction.