skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes, we'd like to introduce more standard rules and visual notations as provided by UML. Did you get a chance to try the call graph? It contains functions and classes in one view. We're going to give the user control over the call graph's scope (whether to show functions, classes, files, etc), which would be closer to simplified class diagrams/function call mapping.

The info in sequence diagrams is useful - maybe we can show this using a hierarchical layout & edge labels
Injectable heart stimulator for emergency situations
> In fact, one survey by the US Library of Congress suggested that less than 20% of all recorded music was available on the internet.

Do they mean commercially? Public and private trackers fill much of this void
> Refactoring the logs in existing code bases today is a manual slog.

slog is shorthand for structured logs[1][2][3][4]. So refactoring the logs [without a tool] is manually converting them to a slog. You have a great pun on your hands.

> Speaking from experience?

I have a notebook laying around with a loose plan on how to get the most compression possible out of a log file. It would use ML to figure out what the log strings would be - but I think your idea of scanning the executable is even more clever. Anyway, once it knows the log strings you can probably stuff it into off the shelf column storage for great compression rates. And if the compression rates are good enough then searches should be much much faster as well.

Who do you reckon are the more important existing competitors? Grafana labs or Sonarqube?

[1] https://github.com/slog-rs/slog

[2] https://github.com/gookit/slog

[3] https://github.com/kala13x/slog

[4] https://pkg.go.dev/log/slog
Source of famed Wow! signal likely found
Like WiFi?
aloha!
That's exactly how Google finally cleaned up YouTube comments! /s
It doesn't work well with TSA. It's hit or miss. At Hartsfield at least, half the times the reader comes back with an error. So the TSA person will ask me to show my physical ID. Initially I thought it was my phone, which is an old Iphone XS. Then I tried it my work phone which is a iphone 14. Same issue.
Is it still open core? Which parts are only available on the enterprise version? Couldn't easily find in their website (after this announcement).
That’s my take, that it has always been understood to be “stuff you don’t want in your browser history” mode.
With all these agent, I am beginning to feel they all have the 'same' source and only differentiate in the UI/UX component. My mind is into the route to use AI agent as an exercise to create yet another, AI agent.
DuckDuckGo for Mac is now open source
I think this is the most privacy-friendly and reasonable approach. However, as a devil’s advocate, this is still pretty fingerprintable.

“Most users load n pages with ankles, the likelihood of a user only loading a single page with ankles is someone under the age of X from country Y with Z% likelihood”
Some text on our website's homepage (https://codeviz.ai)
Costs are going down a lot due to algorithmic improvements. But maybe that just results in increased usage (Jevons paradox)? When there are conflicting trends, the future is pretty hard to predict.

Are any AI companies making money now? Losses can’t go on forever.
Wifi is included with the pi zero 2 W, hence the W.
Marmosets use specific 'names' for one another, study finds
To the tech crowd that visits HN, it's obvious what Incognito did and didn't do.

But imagine your non-technical family members. You know, the type that calls you up for tech support on a regular basis because "you know computers". Someone tells them "Hey, you should be using Incognito when doing adult activities" and then gets caught browsing adult sites on a work computer because they thought Incognito would make it invisible.

This lawsuit isn't for you and me, it's for them.

The question is, since WE know what it did, is it ethical (or even legal) for us to join the class action?

Personally, even if it was legal, and even if someone convinced me it wasn't unethical, I wouldn't do it. I don't want to risk Google being like "You joined a lawsuit against us, so we don't want to do business with you. Say goodbye to your entire Google account. This locks you out of your phone? Too damn bad."
As an aside, I haven’t seen a Tux icon on the top-left of a screen in a while. Do they still have as many Tuxes as cores?

Will that be true with the DRM kernel panic screen?
Sure, but unless the data is given some special new kind of copyright that can't be licensed or whatever, that wouldn't. Copyright just isn't the right tool for this job.
Erm, no, not in 754 floating point.

The significand of a normalized number starts with an implied 1 to the left of the decimal point, which isn’t explicitly represented. In other words, the significand represents the range [1, 2) for normalized numbers.

In fact, that’s reason we need subnormal numbers: they are numbers for which the implied first bit is not 1, so the significand represents the range [0, 1).

Subnormal numbers therefore do not have a fixed number of digits (precision). As subnormals approach zero, the precision gets smaller.
Alas, houses appreciate, cars depreciate, and RVs are just worthless. I exaggerate, but RV depreciation is absolutely nothing like auto depreciation. They lose 25% driving off the lot and another 25% per year (numbers out my ass, but correct order of magnitude).

The cost certainly would the most make sense on gigantic $300k class As, which also conveniently have space for lots of panels and lots of batteries. And indeed you see the most elaborate factory-installed solar setups on those beasts. That's a tiny market, though.

I think you're right about the future. It won't be long before thousands of watts of solar come standard on most RVs. In fact I don't think it will be all that long (decade or two maybe?) before the RV is clad in some kind of solar material. Like every square inch of the surface is generating solar.
It's absolutely insane to me that people can be scared of participating in legal processes against a megacorporation for fear that the megacorp will retaliate by holding their accounts hostage, but then not do anything to remove their reliance on those services. Start migrating your damn email! It sounds like Google has you kidnapped because they pretty much do, and you're letting them!
I find it amusing (actually more tragic than amusing) that the same politicians who tell us all day that corporations can't be trusted because they are run by people with character flaws (greed, lying, laziness, etc.); will turn around and tell us that handing more power and influence over to a government agency is a good idea.

They make it sound like the job pool between the public and private sector is completely separate when many people move back and forth between the two.

Take away the accountability that often governs the private sector and that seems to be the recipe for situations like this.
Not that I know of. That isn't part of my use cases, but I see now that the fastmail feature is doing something like that.
Visit Bletchley Park
Theres also the people that just map the PCIe device into a userland process: https://www.dpdk.org/
There's fortunately a lot less of this. The last new VMS server SKU was launched in 2004, and HP stopped production in 2015. Unlike IBM which launches new hardware every few years and has continued to update the OS. The risk calculation is completely different. However, there are certainly still laggards on the platform who are being led around by the barely funded VMS x86 project.
EU has funded Servo, which is a lot better than giving money to already-rich Mozilla CxOs: https://nlnet.nl/project/Verso/
Internet banking is so ridiculously insecure, I always go do it myself in person.

Although, I rarely have to do anything with the bank that would require any online or offline process beyond using an ATM.

So no, that wouldn't really be a reason for me to stop using Firefox.
> Maybe I'm just jaded & tech-savvy,

The tech-savvy part is what matters.

Try asking a non-technical relative what they think Incognito does, if they even know that it even exists.
I’m wondering if their thinking was: if they contacted the sole developer, and he perceived it as a threat (whether security or personal livelihood) then the deck is stacked against them when they then have to escalate. The dev has already said “some hackers say they hacked my service” to TSA and kicked the beehive.

I wouldn’t have a clue who to report it to myself; the record of DHS is pretty awful too. Lots of folks are saying (and one even betting on!) them being charged for their find within the next couple of years, and given US federal agencies’ records when it comes to these vulns I’d be quite worried about it too if I had found it.
Perhaps you have said this elsewhere, but why shut the site down?
That's how I get my data, well at least substantively check some of my data. Behavioral analytics a.k.a big anecdata. With great care and restraint it is possible to extract useful information from a large amount of biased sources - just can't publish it unless you want to spend the rest of your life arguing with people who argue for a living and do little else (academics).

With enough data it's possible to disambiguate between genetically linked behaviors and learned behaviors because of the different diffuse patterns through disparate populations. The summary is that behavior and intelligence is absolutely dominated by genes, there is really only a 13% residual - so on a nature vs nurture spectrum the nurture is less than 13%.

The stronger the selection criteria bias on intelligence the more likely a RCCX gene variant (SNPs) will be selected, specifically TNXB (burnout / ME/CFS), C4 (schizophrenia), and CYP21A2 (generalized anxiety disorder).

You may wonder why this doesn't come up in GWAS studies - usually there is an assumption of independence of SNPs due to the idea that most SNPs are very old and genetic drift has been sufficient to provide this independence. Since these individual SNPs are so behaviorally impactful there a strong sexual selection bias that takes place so those assumptions don't hold and thus the math is bunk. I could spend forever talking about the incompetence of medical research.

Dr Jessica Eccles is probably doing the best research where she talks about the shocking 'overrepresentation' of Generalized Hypermobility Disorders (GHD) in the Long Covid populations. In my view the only difference between GHD and hEDS is the number and severity of TNXB SNPs, so while 2% of the population are impacted most of those are only mildly impacted. The co-occurrence of multiple TNXB SNPs is much higher random chance - again from the aforementioned sexual selection biases. In general researchers into such conditions assume TNXB SNPs are far too common to cause such a rare disease, the thing is that it's not a rare disease - just rarely diagnosed and surfaces in a variety of complex ways that look completely different to the untrained eye.

You can get a Deep Whole Genome Sequence for ~ $280 from dantelabs and then you'll know for sure.
they can appeal to the state to get them to do it

the end result is the same.

Whitehall

1: i was talking about the US government and my own.

2: i am not from the UK

therefore your comment is entirely inappropriate.
Yet somehow data brokers know every medical condition you've ever had and they sell it to anyone who will pay them.

See also:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/11/business/google-ascension...

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-data-brokers-...

https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/11/would-you-trust-goog...

https://slate.com/technology/2022/06/health-data-brokers-pri...
The rise of social media was largely predicated on the curation it provided. People, and particularly advertisers, wanted a curated environment. That was the key differentiator to the wild west of the world wide web.

The idea that curation is a problem with social media is always a head scratcher for me. The option to just directly publish to the world wide web without social media is always available, but time and again, that option is largely not chosen... this ruling could well narrow it down that being the only option.

Now, in practice, I don't think that will happen. This will raise the costs of operating social media, and those costs will be reflected in prices advertisers pay to advertise on social media. That may shrink the social media ecosystem, but what it will definitely do is raise the draw bridge over the moat around the major social media players. You're going to see less competition.
> Alcohol (the consumption form) serves only one purpose to get you buzzed.

Since consumable alcohol has other legitimate uses besides getting a buzz on, I don't think this point stands. For example, it's used quite often in cooking and (most of the time?) no intoxicating effects remain in the final product.
As far as I can tell from some quick searching around, that limit only applies to cookies set through JavaScript code, as opposed to through server headers.

I assume it's because of situations where websites include JavaScript from a third party, and then that JS uses first party cookies as a state-keeping workaround while synchronizing tracking information in some other way.
The personalized aspect wasn't emphasized at all in the ruling. It was the curation. I don't think TikTok would have avoided liability by simply sharing the video with everyone.
I feel wording like "browse the web privately", the disguise icon, and the name of "incognito" could very easily suggest to a casual user that the purpose is hiding your identity from websites. There is now a disclaimer explicitly clarifying that's not the case, but not originally.
> I'm not interested in debating politics

> would you say the law itself..

Well, you're asking a question that, in a vacuum, isn't political but since it can be considered controversial, and I think you know this, it becomes political. So did you want to debate politics or not?
Is there a research paper or white paper associated with it to know more about the architecture? Is it like a RAG technique where 100M token is similar to storing data (token) externally and fetching relevant pieces? What is the price associated with it? Please share more details. Thank you.
This is true for a definition of smog that specifically excludes NOx emissions
that's very much not true? these things are nearly always contingent fee.
GCL, the Google Closure Library was sunset and this was announced almost a year ago on the mailing lists. The archiving was scheduled for 2024-08-01.

GCC, the Google Closure Compiler, is still used by Google internally and they are shifting towards supporting the compiler for tools that emit "ClosureJS" (remember goog.define and goog.provide?). ClojureScript is one of several tools that target "ClosureJS" and there is not much to fear.

ClojureScript has always distributed GCC and GCL as date-versioned JARs since there is no formal release process of either component outside of Google. The GCL code "just works" for the most part and is frozen in time. GCL became unnecessary for two reasons.

1. GCL existed at a time when JavaScript had no notion of a module system whatsoever (not even CommonJS). It was very tedious to import third-party code. So GCL was designed as a kitchensink that'd work across browsers.

2. Many parts of the GCL kitchensink became unnecessary as the JavaScript standard library gained equivalent functionality and browsers standardized.

For instance, goog.net.BrowserChannel predates WebSockets and has lots of hacks so it works reliably on various versions of Internet Explorer. There has realistically been no need to use goog.net.BrowserChannel over WebSocket for almost a decade now.

Another example: goog.crypt methods (base64, encodeStringToByteArray, etc.) are now provided by the JavaScript standard library

Yet another example: all of the functionality in the goog.async package (besides Debouncer) is provided by the JavaScript standard library through Promise.

Then there's other things that existed purely for browser compatibility, like goog.net.XhrIo (an XHR wrapper that isn't needed unless you care about IE5 quirks). Almost everybody, even in ClojureScript, uses fetch nowadays.

There's more examples, but look around for yourself and you will see that almost everything in the library can be served by modern JavaScript and a few NPM packages. https://google.github.io/closure-library/api/
Why should Paul Graham's comments not be downvoted or removed from HN?
Why is SDL API needed vs gfx-rs / wgpu though? I.e. was there a need to make yet another one?
What does the word “incognito” mean to you?
You make it sound like being free of Google is a bad thing. :-/
Vivaldi users: ::autistic screeching::
I have a causeway (going with something different for variety) to sell you because you don’t take into account that the ClojureScript project can just fork because they have sufficient access to expertise (most projects don’t, but they do, partly because they’re big enough and partly because they’re very strong with computer science). You raise a good point but don’t allow for solutions to be presented and assume it’s a distaster scenario.
I use https://www.facebook.com/?filter=friends&sk=h_chr on desktop. It's only posts from my friends in chronological order (plus ads). What I've noticed is my friends don't post nearly as much anymore. My suspicion is that is why the algorithm promotes groups and click/rage-bait now. I would guess actual normal friends of ours stopped posting so much because their feeds became so intolerable in the first place.
pretty sure this will sell your email to data brokers and you possibly maybe will get a check in the mail for $2.01 in ten years.
You can view the content via direct links or search, recommendation algorithms isn't the only way to view it.

If you child porn that gets shared via direct links then that is bad even if nobody can see it, but it is much much worse if you start recommending that to people as well.
It should only be weighed against the harms it's caused right now and any company responsible for those harms should face meaningful consequences as a result. It doesn't matter if humans would have done worse in the same situation (something you can't easily prove anyway) the same way we don't weigh the actions of a murderer based on how much more horrifically some other murderer might have killed the victims. We just punish the murderer we have for what they've actually done.

Maybe generally software is a good idea, but this software was a total nightmare and it clearly has no place making these decisions.
> Before the lawsuit what it said was

That's incorrect, there's always been a list of entities that your behavior won't be hidden from, including "websites you visit" (worded in a couple of different ways).

Just image search Chrome incognito and pick a year to append to it, looks like someone always has a tutorial with a screenshot (and someone linked the chrome announcement video with it in a comment above)
It was RIM.

I don’t know what Nokia’s reaction was. I don’t think I’ve ever heard.

As the smartphone king at the time in the US RIM is always the one people talked about.
Also want to note that the inverse solution that companies could take is to be overly Draconian in moderating content, so as to take down anything that could come back negatively on them (in this case, the role of publisher is assumed and thus content moderation needs to be sufficiently robust so as to cover the company's ass).
This one has a huge hard drive:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/326247919423
Yeah, no. So, at Christmas I was actually going to visit my mother. Kings Cross had advanced weather notice so they'd gone to a contigency plan, wall off that "loads of ticket barriers" (actually nowhere close to enough) with movable fencing and put staff behind the fences to allow in only those who were immediately travelling.

As I arrived, they announced that due to a tree falling on the line all service from those platforms was cancelled, no trains predicted for over an hour. My train, due to leave in about half an hour, was now delayed "indefinitely" supposedly.

But I've seen this movie before, I didn't go far. Sure enough, as I was loitering near a food stand 10-15 minutes later they announced that "no trains" had a single exception, my train was in fact running exactly as scheduled.

So I went to that "loads of barriers" and of course there's an enormous crowd just stood there, motionless, because they aren't able to process anything except that they are at a train station and they aren't being allowed to board a train, so they're just stood there next to these handful of barriers. I try to fight my way through the crowd, but it's too far and after about five minutes the staff announce that oh, actually there's another of these non-existent trains going somewhere else now, we're boarding that train and the one has now left.

About an hour later, with the station continuing to announce both that there are no trains and service hasn't resumed, and yet periodically that in fact each of the scheduled trains has (miraculously?) arrived anyway on time and is scheduled to depart on schedule contrary to the message they've also read out, this time I am standing near the front of that huge crowd and can force my way through to board the next train to my destination.

I'm sure they've promised themselves there's "zero crush risk" because they've screened off the barriers. "Yup, nobody was crushed against the barriers. Good work senior management team"
I imagine you might do well to write your prompt with similar language (diction, sentence construction, etc.) to what you'd find in the output/answer you are attempting to evoke from the LLM. These are prediction machines, after all.
I think its instructive to look at the early history of Google and Facebook. In the early years they did not really turn on the ad revenue levers and just focused on increasing users (i.e. Don't Be Evil) - until a decade after offering their respective services.

Similarly Netflix is just now starting the ad revenue model after years of only subscription based services.

Eventually the temptation for multiple sources of revenue (i.e. subscription AND advertising) will likely be too great due to:

- IPO and Wall Street demands net income growth (i.e. FB/Google)

- Private Equity buys the company and needs to pay back leveraged debt

- The number of customers willing to offer up a credit card for Search stagnates and a lower cost ad tier appears and the ad infrastructure that is built is applied to the paid tiers
From the incognito mode landing page:

> Your activity might still be visible to:

> Your employer or school

If they want to blame someone for being caught watching adult content at work, blame the person who told them "Hey, you should be using Incognito when doing adult activities"
Politics and culture play an outsized part. If I could easily move to Canada I would. Barring that, I'm more inclined to stick to blue states than red states. Montana is a bit of an outlier in my list. Cannabis legality is a factor (Wisconsin is the oddball here), but increasingly less so as I expect that problem to go away within a few years nationwide (and certainly in Wisconsin). Climate is a big factor. I grew up in NJ, and while I've lived in tropical places and tend to spend my summer traveling to a lot of hot places, I don't want to live in a hot, humid southern state. There are parts of NC and TN that are more more mountainous and less oppressive, but it's still pretty sticky there.

I still plan to spend much of the year traveling in an RV even after I settle somewhere. I'd be happy to spend the winter holed up in a cabin with a wood stove though.
> Do you recall any specific browsing sessions during these times?(Required)

lol