skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes, you can go that direction as well, although in a decentralized architecture there’s no shared notion of “coming online”.

For example:

1. you have four peers collaborating on a document

2. for some extended period peer A only communicates with peer B and peer C only communicates with peer D (and vice versa)

3. the peers truncate the operations at some point within that period

4. each pair of peers now has a document irreconcilable with the other even though all peers “came online” recently
It's more that they have the ability to control the pressurisation manually in case the automatic system fails.

Ultimately the pilots have to be able to turn anything off that might malfunction.
i am curious about ryzen 9000 performance on windows 10 but nobody seems to be testing that for some reason
Which incident are you referring to with the altitude confusion example?
Publishing a peer reviewed paper would equate to handing their IP over for free. Maybe the right thing to do in the face of such a tragedy is to do that.

Or perhaps they genuinely have some cool technology, and it could be sold into aero, military industries and they want to monetize it.

In that case the right thing to do would be to hand over their projected track data, which it sounds like they did.
What is it you're suffering from?
Do you have references / communities / guides?
I have Ulcerative Colitis which I got around 2018 and it seems well managed.

Since my first COVID infection, I ended up with repetitive thoughts, short term memory problems, difficulty focusing, light sensitivity, fatigue ...

It got better but it seems that seasonal allergies re-trigger some kind of cascading inflammation and I've been useless for most of the summer.

Are you talking specifically about long-COVID?
I don't think they'd say it's because they don't like the idea of a needle in their arm, but for a lot of them, I think it's a significant contributing factor.
What's this magic netcode that stops aimbotting?
Data Engineering for AI/ML
Reviving the Other Web
The Call Center Capital Is Gripped by AI Fever – and Fear
The GTA San Andreas VR Remake Sounds Dead in the Water as Meta Pivots to AI
An off-day is an off-day. If it was possible to find some method to be productive it wouldn't be an off-day.

Just like getting sick there's not much that you can do about it once you have it.

Once you have an off-day it's better to accept that you won't be very productive and inform your superior, instead of trying to force something and having to make up for that lost productivity the following days.

Just as with getting sick, the best thing you can do is prevention. Make sure you have a healthy sleep pattern, eat varied and in moderation, exercise regularly, and take care of your mental health.

If you feel like you have a lot of off-days try to figure out why that is. Are you sleeping well? are you stressed or anxious? Make a note of these things on your off-days (it can be hard to accurately remember emotions) and try to see if you can discern a pattern.
No paywall: https://archive.ph/NX28x
Although realistically you’d have to be scraping them on a corporate level with actual returns on the scraping for them to sue.
NetNewsWire is great, but iOS/iPad/Mac only. It syncs between devices using iCloud, so without a Feedly etc. account. That feature seems to be pretty rare.
SpaceX launches 21 Starlink satellites, rocket's first stage crashes on landing
I'm not sure "The Matrix" was meant to be a How-To Manual... because this sure feels like the first step to humans in a tube.
Heritability doesn't provide much information about anything. Researchers working in genetics and development have moved beyond it as more sophisticated, accurate approaches have become more widely available. This paper is a good basic introduction to the concept's limitations.

Moore, D. S., & Shenk, D. (2017). The heritability fallacy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 8(1-2), e1400.

https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/wcs.1...
I obviously don't believe anything but deliberate murder-suicide by the pilot.

But just know that these things did happen.

There's lots of indications that surfaced recently that the Israeli air force secretly shoot down Itavia Flight 870 in 1980 to stop a transport of nuclear technology to Iran. They had mistaken the correct flight because their intelligence in France (were the uranium was being produced for Iran) pointed them in the wrong direction.

A very interesting book on the topic has been recently released with a deep and thorough investigation across France, Italy and Israel and it is to date the most credible and documented explanation for who shoot down the flight.

The book has been followed by quite a lot of investigative journalism in Italy that gives this theory lots of credit.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/213592261-il-quinto-scen...
Because if you have control of the aircraft you already can kill everyone if you wanted. Manual control of cabin pressure could be useful if the pressurization system malfunctioned and needed to be manually overridden.
That's a fair point. Personally, I don't want a car at all but it's highly impractical for me not to have one where I live. I didn't own a car until my 30s and before that I biked or took the bus everywhere. However, where I am now public transit is severely lacking and the weather is often not conducive to biking.
"Exploitative" IT firm has been delaying 2,000 recruits' onboarding for years
I’m gonna throw up.
You don't find it interesting that both Meta and Google had monopoly lawsuits aimed at them in 2020?

And at the exact same time, the exact same people were "asking" for scientific discussion of many kinds to be shut down across Whatsapp, YouTube, Instagram and Facebook, among many others?

Because it wasn't just Ivermectin. It was the lableak hypothesis, investigating the WIV, following back GOF funding, vaccine contracts, vaccine side-effects, vaccine effectiveness, lockdown effectiveness, natural immunity discussion, etc etc etc; all restricted and suppressed to fit whatever the Biden admin decided.

That's not hyperbole, that's simple and well documented fact. And, as was directly pointed out in this letter/article, the Biden admin wasn't above using lies to shut down politically inconvenient (and true) stories.
I think the article refers to the actual human(s) doing the work, not machines. Quite confusing, not sure if it's intentional or not.
Uh, maybe because monster death animations make up a small part of the training material (ie. gameplay) so the model has not learned to reproduce them very well?

There cannot be "video compression artifacts" because it hasn’t even seen any compressed video during training, as far as I can see.

Seriously, how is this even a discussion? The article is clear that the novel thing is that this is real-time frame generation conditioned on the previous frame(s) AND player actions. Just generating video would be nothing new.
I had hoped that 4 years of Trump + 4 years of Biden would be enough for people to realize that maybe the president is not as important as made out to be.

But just the opposite has happened.

Which is funny because half the country would vote for a lamp post if it was running against Trump, and vice versa.
The "heart," but the only mention of pay is $10/hour, and advancement leads to more long nights as a chef in the volatile restaurant industry? Such respect

Edit: also, the lip service of the title "porter" - the electric company will surely except that as payment
Judge dismisses majority of GitHub Copilot copyright claims
Defence ministry IT problem has caused nationwide outage
It's due to our lifestyle, 100%.
I know some don't like to trust the science, but may the downvotes come :

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S01614...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18266879/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18086216/

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352773611_Health_ef...
LLM Fine-Tuning Best Practices: Base Models Proprietary/Open Source, Large/Small
Hey HN! I've been working on a series capturing the industry best practices in producing fine-tuned LLMs. Our first post covered training data preparation, and for this one we'll be talking about how to select your base model and hyperparameters, covering both closed and open models as well as models of different sizes. This was created in collaboration with Kyle Corbitt at OpenPipe (kcorbitt) who will be in the comments as well!

We cover:

- Proprietary (well mainly OpenAI) vs open source models: OAI has really great performance w/ relatively small training datasets but you hit a ceiling on max performance sooner than you do w/ open source models. We're not sure exactly what drives this, but it very well could be that OAI has made some technical decisions under the hood that leans towards this "Red Mage" approach in order to serve a broader audience (ie users w/ less training data).

- Large vs Small Models: Main thing is larger models typically let you "get away" with less training data all things equal. But where possible you want to deploy the smallest model that achieves acceptable performance in prod. Smaller is less "costly" across a variety of dimensions (not just price).

- Hyperparameter Tuning: We cover this in some detail for those who are curious, but to be frank hparam tuning is generally not a high ROI use of your engineering time. Plow that time into dataset curation instead :)

Hope this is useful for folks! Happy to answer questions here (and hope to learn something new too)
What about household ones?
Weirdly enough, I always think that 9/11 was a Friday; and now Album day is Friday!
I remember hearing about some boy who was sent to a prison for a minor offence, was raped, got HIV.

Regardless of your intent, which I cannot know because I am not a mind-reader, what you write here therefore still comes across as if it was ~"it's only bad when pre-op trans women do it".
(warning, heavily opinionated post follows)

I know it's asking for a lot, but it would be really cool if Pidgin
would have 1st-class out-of-the-box support for Matrix.

I don't want to get into discussions if it's better than Jabber, because
I don't really think it is, but since the momentum is on Matrix rather
than XMPP, then I'd say that Pidgin could use the fact that currently
Matrix lacks a proper client. By "proper client" I mean something that
is feature-complete by standards of year 2000 (actually good software,
like Pidgin), not 2020 (which features broken, half-ass web prototypes
that people call software).

It would probably help with fighting the parasites like Discord, which
is way too popular than it should be.
I am curious, so I know that a big part of SpaceX is the re-usability aspect. But at what point is the rocket basically paid for (except for continued Maintence)?

Given that this is this rocket's 23rd flight, was this really a "loss" for SpaceX or was the rocket already basically paid off.

I realize launches for Starlink make this a more complicated number.
what is wasted?
IPs.
not like IP addresses themself were not an actifical limit - but let set aside this for now.
if i setup an MX, it still needs to be on port 25, because the vast majority of MTAs are not capable of service discovery; and there is no Host header or SNI/ECH for SMTP, so for each mail.DOMAIN.TLD i have to buy an IP, just to put them over a single multi-domain postfix/exim in order to please those MTAs who are requisiting the HELO name to match to the MX's reverse record.

how wonderful a world-wide adoption of rfc 6186 would be to able to put multi-domain mail server on a single IP.
My rule is if I need to join the Discord and I can’t figure it out with the given docs, I don’t use that project. It’s helped me save a lot of headaches with dealing with their “community” who are more likely to spam NSFW than actually commit to a discussion of the project.
> - (Mostly) sane keyboard shortcuts, where (almost) every DE-specific shortcut involves the Super (AKA Meta, AKA Mod4) key.

Is this also enforced for apps? I'd switch back to linux in a heartbeat if I could do this. The use of `control` as both a UI and a terminal binding basically ruins the entire os for me.
It wouldn't and I don't think they are really trying to say that it did.

It's just that you have to start your analysis somewhere, and, obviously, our own evolutionary branch (i.e. homo sapiens) is the most relevant.
> Have fun with your MX not being port 25.

why? it would be a great spam filter!
Humans use the machines
Ubuntu does not keep up, speaking from experience.
So... where exactly do the neurons come from? Are these donated neurons or grown in a lab from samples?

This seems... questionable at best. Not really comfortable with the idea of this...
Same reason the engines have "kill everyone on board" setting. You know - "shut down".
> Every human endeavour is constrained by resources

There is a difference between constraining activities based on resources at hand and adopting a hypothesis because it favours your resource constraints. (Searching for keys under the light is reasonable. Concluding the keys must be under the light is not.)

> Is this your first time hearing about humans being confused by complicated technology?

An airline using a free consumer tool [1] to track its planes is not a problem of complicated technology. (FlightExplorer has a professional edition, but it runs natively. If flightops were looking at a website, they were essentially using Google Flights to track their planes.)

[1] https://travel.flightexplorer.com
Research is regarding commercial dishwashers only
The Idea Maze Is a Useless Idea
This article is talking about humans that wash dishes in restaurants.
shameless self promotion https://github.com/SchumacherFM/wordpress-to-hugo-exporter
Yeah, but many of the viruses mutate rapidly, so the immunity gained from a cold virus from years ago won't help much today.
Selfhosted miniflux.
How are you testing air quality on the plane?

I am also curious how you connect CO2 levels to pathogen levels. Would a carbon filtration system adjust the CO2 levels at the same rate as pathogens?
I can see how this would be useful for research, but on the other hand it feels like a step towards the dystopian servitors[0] from Warhammer 40k.

[0] "robots" made from criminals/clones since AI is banned
Am I the only one who thinks this is faked?

It's not that hard to fake something like this: Just make a video of DOSBox with DOOM running inside of it, and then compress it with settings that will result in compression artifacts.
seems like clickbait

traceroute uses udp to a high-port for discovery, not icmp-echo.
No, it’s predicting the next frame conditioned on past frames AND player actions! This is clear from the article. Mere video generation would be nothing new.
Brief on Firefox.
But does it need to be frame-based?

What if you combine this with an engine in parallel that provides all geometry including characters and objects with their respective behavior, recording changes made through interactions the other model generates, talking back to it?

A dialogue between two parties with different functionality so to speak.

(Non technical person here - just fantasizing)
Always nice to see that SL is still going. I'll probably never remember my login to my old 2006 era account but the years of weird virtual world memories remain.
It isn't altruism anymore than your neurons are being altruistic. People have a really mistaken idea about ants (specifically using terms like queen implying there is a hierarchy). Ant _colonies_ are intelligent creatures that learn, remember, negotiate, wage war. Ants themselves aren't intelligent, don't have a hierarchy, don't even really have a "self"
> the operations team apparently doesn't understand how their flight tracker works

The operations team didn't have a flight tracker. The Flight Explorer website is a free consumer tool [1]. The actual flight tracking software is native [2].

Malaysia Airlines' flightops was essentially using Google Flights to track their planes. That's the WTF.

> actually the computer just uses fixed data that does not take such exceptional situations into account

I've never flown a 777. But modern GA flight computers, e.g. G1000, are pretty advanced about projecting fuel consumption. (Of course, this wasn't always the case [2].)

[1] https://travel.flightexplorer.com

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_Glider

[2] https://www.flightexplorer.com/products/professional/FE-Prof...
Just because it's physically possible for someone to passively MITM a connection doesn't mean everyone and their dog is actually listening in on it. If they were, there'd be a booming industry of leaking celebrities' scandalous DNS requests. Instead, I'd suspect that actual actors with that capability wouldn't be burning it on small-time replay attacks.
Show HN: Microsoft 362 – A Browser Extension
Inspired by fefe [0] and zaporters ""Open"AI is not open" addon [1]
I've created an extension which replaces "Microsoft 362" with "Microsoft 362".

If you have no clue why, have a look at [2,3]

[0] https://blog.fefe.de/?q=Microsoft%20362

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35327112

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41109047

[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41005056
What can you run on it? How far away are we from this being able to train, say, an LLM?
> There's no right of first sale for copyrighted code.

Yes, that was the premise of the complaint.

> Citation

I don't see anything here that resembles first sale, just a ruling that copyright applies to compiled code. The concept of first sale doctrine is that despite the presence of the seller's ip the seller loses control over most uses. Nobody is arguing against the existence of the copyright.
This is it exactly. Discord is, inherently, where quick gratification prospers. Immediate memetic responses followed by swapping to the next server for the next high.
I recently visited the site from Google and seen a notification. One of my questions was "closed" in favor of another newer question. The person (mod) who closed the question answered the newer question, despite the existence of several replies and a marked answer. He also somehow bumped his answer all the way to the top.

All of this, apparently, because he is advertising his profile as an "xxx" expert. I am not going to point the person here publicly but if someone from SO is interested, I can send it over email.
I don't think the concern was necessarily about overhead, but about sensitive data. This is a problem in Git too: people make the mistake of reverting a commit with sensitive values and think it's gone, but the history is still out there.

Edit: or maybe that was the concern, but this other concern exists too :)
HLS video streaming from Opencv and FFmpeg
Hey, starting to write a reply to you caused me to remember why I quit. It was the moderation tools for sure.

One of them changed so that when you reviewed something it would show you at random a sample that had already been reviewed, but this was not indicated in any way. If you got the review "correct" it said "well done, that was to test you are paying attention!" - it was even more patronizing if you got it wrong.

I was so annoyed that they had wasted my time in this way that I stopped contributing all together. It was a wake up call that the whole site was taking advantage of our free labor, and I decided to do better things with my time.
> 1 billion frames in memory... With such dataset, you have seen practically all realistic possibilities in the short-term.

I mean... no? Not even close? Multiply the number of game states with the number of inputs at any given frame gives you a number vastly bigger than 1 billion, not even comparable. Even with 20 days of play time to train no, it's entirely likely that at no point did someone stop at a certain location and look to the left from that angle. They might have done from similar angles, but the model then has to reconstruct some sense of the geometry of the level to synthesize the frame. They might also not have arrived there from the same direction, which again the model needs some smarts to understand.

I get your point, it's very overtrained on these particular levels of Doom, which means you might as well just play Doom. But this is not a hash table lookup we're talking about, it's pretty impressive work.
That's shameful for all humanity that while some people are gorging, others have to kill and eat intelligent animals.
What people who only use stackoverflow superficially don't get is that stackoverflow is not a community, but a collection of communities that coalesce around major tags.

I, for example, frequent almost exclusively the Java tag and I can assure you that the question we mark as duplicates the most are very few:

- How to compare strings in java (because people keep using == instead of `.equals()`

- Why doesn't this class/array change when I pass it to a method (because java is pass-by-value, not pass-by-reference)[1]

- What does "cannot find symbol" mean (where the duplicate target helpfully explain in what cases this could happen, including, but not limited to "you declared it inside a loop so it's not visible outside) [2]

- Why my scanner skips reading a line in this loop (because every time you use `nextFoo` where `Foo` is not `Line` you need to read the newline as well before continuing)[3]

The other sort of questions we tend to close are the one easily answerable by learning any basic tutorial, the ones that tell us "my code doesn't work" without showing their code, the ones that just dump their homework and expect us to write a solution. And casual user rarely see this questions because we usually also delete them, but I can assure that most of our moderation time is spent handling this kind of stuff, not closing as duplicate.

On the other hand, one kind of question that is not well received but IMHO should not lead to closing or downvoting (but it does) is "I want to do this weird and non-idiomatic thing. How do I do it}". Unless, of course, it's an actual XY problem, in which case it helps if the person asking the question states why they want to do such a thing.

All of this to say, your experience with the site will vary depending on what technology you're asking about.

And "your answer sounds like your average SO moderator's" yes, it does, because we use the site a lot and we know what we're talking about :)

[0] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/513832/how-do-i-compare-...

[1] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40480/is-java-pass-by-re...

[2] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25706216/what-does-a-can...

[3] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13102045/scanner-is-skip...
The interesting thing is the physical process creating the floor is a fairly novel one, coherent scattering of neutrinos off nuclei. This is where the neutrino scatters off all the nucleons together, with the contributions adding coherently, rather than incoherent scattering off individual nucleons.

This process was first observed only fairly recently, at the Spallation Neutron Source using neutrinos from stopped pions. IIRC, they realized a service corridor under the target room would be unintentionally suitable for the experiment.

https://coherent.ornl.gov/
They get paid in lip service apparently. Just like all the essential workers during covid lockdowns.
In fact RANDOM.ORG uses "atmospheric noise, originating from lightning strikes in the planet's atmosphere" as (one of?) seed for generating data

Source: https://api.random.org/features
> The handle must have PROCESS_VM_READ access to the process.

While the process still stays in user space, that's significantly different than "just being a user space program"
Ah, well, I defer to your industry knowledge, in that case. I'm not very knowledgeable on this sector.
Exactly. Now if we decide that on some type of aircraft we will display both kind of information to the pilots then it is a user interface task how to present these two similar but different information in such a way that it is clear which one is which.