skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Damn, this sounds too good to be true. Really nothing to add here except than keep pushing!

This fixes the big painpoint that nowadays' cross-platform frameworks come with performance tradeoffs as they have a unified presentation layer!
neo means new
>>>> that unregulated capitalism tries to steer humanity into.

What part of this economy seems unregulated to you? What a ridiculous notion talking about military contracts no less.

You couldn’t be more far off from finding the source of problem then just mindlessly throwing in a dig at capitalism, the way the government awards contract is anything but competitive or capitalistic
I'm not aware of one. Any tool that tells you disk space has to actually crawl the directory tree to report it. But that is precisely the thing we want to parallelize.

The only other option I can think of is to dynamically adjust. Maybe after a certain amount of work has completed, spin up more threads. But I'm not sure it's worth doing.
Personally, I understand the fundamentals until they all change and DNS has had a lot of outgrowths relating to encryption, Email spam prevention, IPv6, etc that have made things a lot muddier for me over time.
Thank you, added it to my comment. I missed all the discussions!
Are the hedgies short laddering to inflict max pain?
What could it be? Based on the backgrounds of everyone involved, it could be something VR/AR.

I also wonder if hardware is the right thing to get into right now, I imagine Apple and Google will have most consumers locked down. Your phone already has all your photos, email, music, location, etc.
Hidden, by all accounts, is a deletion on a platform like this.

US free speech allows someone to protest on public property (within reason, of course). If they could only protest in their home, would that be free speech? By forcing them to "hide" the protest from public view, you've essentially removed their capability of protesting.
If you're referring to the military industrial complex, I don't think this is what Eisenhower was warning about.
famous for linux desktops with wood-grain paneling, if memory serves! (and it maybe doesn't!)
Beat your Bot: Building your moat against AI
Within reason consultants will usually do what their clients request modulo sufficient project budgets. That often includes training. Good luck.
If my exmil co-workers have taught me anything its that anything and everything can be macgyver'd in a pinch. If jerry rigging was a sport these guys would be ranked competitive players.

In this case, your 'threat actor' is servicemen and 'arms race' is like, their whole thing. These guys are bored out of their mind for 95% of their career and will take anything apart if the activity gets them 2 hrs closer to a break.
I'm not anti-union at all, but I do think there is a very common experience that sours people against them early in their career: that of a mandatory union that docks your already meager pay without any obvious benefits. It of course overlooks the things you enjoy as an employee that the union won and fights to retain (breaks, safety standards, etc). I think anyone who wants unions to succeed needs to think about solving that problem, because unions only succeed on collective action.
> Only racists, Islamphopics and peoole who wants all arab dead will disagree.

It's a serious violation of HN's guidelines to use flamewar rhetoric like this. I'm sure you have good reasons to feel strongly about the topic, but it's not ok to break the rules in this way. If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful. Note this one: "Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive."
In the context of software marketing, "modern" is a synonym for "smart" and "fast". They all mean "better but actually worse".
The WindowMaker screenshots page has one just like they described: http://www.windowmaker.org/screenshots/lumpi-wmaker.png
The Stasi infiltrated and tried to influence every organization they could get half a toehold in, in both the BRD/DDR.

That doesn't mean they favored (or otherwise sought to promote) all of the aims and goals of the organizations. Or even any of their aims, necessary.

Their primary goal in doing so was, first and foremost, that of their very motto:

To know everything
Most C# education will teach you to always make an interface for everything for some reason. Even in academia they’ll teach CS students to do this and well… it means there is an entire industry of people who think that over-engineering everything with needless abstractions is best practice.

It is what it is though. At least it’s fairly contained within the C# community in my part of the world.
> But if you don't use Linux or don't actively follow desktop Linux development, then it would be quite easy to have no clue.

I don't, and that's probably why.
Your comments don’t get purged, they just require an extra “show hidden comments” click to be viewed.
> Only antisemites, racists, ethnophobes, and people who want Ukrainians, Israelis and Jews dead will disagree.

It's a serious violation of HN's guidelines to use flamewar rhetoric like this. I'm sure you have good reasons to feel strongly about the topic, but it's not ok to break the rules in this way. If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful. Note this one: "Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive."

---

Edit: unfortunately, your account has been using HN primarily for political and national battle, and breaking the site guidelines a great deal. That's not allowed here, and we have to ban accounts that do it, so I've banned your account. If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future. They're here: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.

I suppose I need to add that this has nothing to do with which side of which battle you're on. We apply the rules the same way regardless of all that. The difference between your account and the other one I scolded in this thread (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41385066) is simply that your account has been violating the rules so frequently, as well as the important meta rule of not using the site primarily to do that.
Oh, I've definitely seen N+1 problems with a SQLite database before. It's more resilient than a traditional DB server, but it can still run into performance issues when doing too many select queries.
the big(gest?) advantage that python has are its data science and ML/DL packages
OP here! I love this stress test. Will index and get back to you!
SQLite underpins nearly every on-disk storage mechanism at Apple and Google as the OS level. You may not be sold but systems programmers elsewhere are.
> first-class development environment (Xcode)

Are you sure
But the result is that you can't assume that this is the case: you have to actually look in a case-by-case basis to decide if the chatbot you are using -- one which has no understanding of copyright as nuanced as either of us -- merely learned something general purpose and applied it in a way which did not lead to infringement, if the code it generated is technically infringing but is fair use, or if what it developed isn't allowed.

A lot of people seem to want to believe that the output of the chatbot is somehow inherently clean in all cases, and they cite this idea that a human can read code and learn from it... but a human can -- even without realizing it!! -- infringe on copyrights, and so such an analogy doesn't absolve the chatbot. If we then continue to assume that the chatbot's output is clean, then we are ascribing it a superhuman ability to launder copyright.
That's what companies already do, charging the government a pretty penny for being in theater.
If you have to know and prove the age of everyone using your site or product, does that not implicitly become an enforced identity system hiding behind the manipulative nature of this bill?

Two things the U.S. Government wants...

1) No encryption they are unable to break with or without the help from the company or people who created it

2) No online activity without tying that identity to a specific person

No anonymous internet for anyone. No encryption beyond what they can backdoor.

Everything else is an emotional manipulation designed to manufacture compliance among the public.
I kept it for a few years as my favorite WM, paired with Rox Filer with its panel switched off, that is, exclusively as a (very fast) file manager. WMaker turned out really useful when over 20 years back I had to set up lots of PCs for remote points of sale operations. Users should be able to do nothing beyond the strict necessary: send-receive mail, go to company's site, schedule remote management, print receipts, etc. No games or other distractions, no downloads, no customizable menus etc. Certainly not rocket science, but users would have very little computer experience, certainly none with Linux, therefore arranging user-proof kiosk-like desktops became mandatory or we would have been overwhelmed by complaints. WMaker did its job brilliantly, I put icons on the dock for all basic operations plus some safeguards to avoid deleting them and opening dangerous menus, and for what I know it still worked great when I left the company one year later. Good memories.
I ran this on my Sparc 10 for a few years (late 90's, early 2000's.)
The Amstrad CPC used the 6845 CRTC and there were lots of other similar warnings about changing the vertical height too much or reducing the sync widths. At the time, people gave all sorts of dire warnings about the monitors being fried. Years later, I have loads of these machines and several monitors, and the only effect I've observed with out-of-spec sync signals is that the monitor can't synchronise properly and you get the rolling screen effect. So, I think all these warnings were theoretical worries rather than based in fact.

Interestingly, it seems some people have also tried to inhibit the CRTC vsync signal and create their own with a similar trick to the PET POKE - see 7.3 on page 40: https://shaker.logonsystem.eu/ACCC1.7-EN.pdf (and a comment on page 41 that they have seen damaged chips resulting from this - the PPI is the 8255 bi-directional parallel port driver chip, used on the Amstrad for scanning keyboard, driving the sound chip and miscellaneous such as the VSYNC line).
I didn't expect someone else to say this, but that is my first thought. If I became supreme leader overnight, I would place a lot of people behind bars, and these guys would be among the first. It's pretty outrageous how much society tolerates the leadership class.
Regarding the formatting, i use Llama 3 mainly, to generate org-mode documentation about functions, i tell it to enclose lines with *Line x-y* and begin_src for the corresponding lines.

It generates most of time perfect formatting which i readily export to markdown with org-mode-html-export.

Showcase of the generated formatting as a screenshot [1].

[1] https://imgur.com/a/97fSWsg
Nice, you've found a pathway to hiring more veterans
Their typewriters are kinda janky, TBH.

https://preview.redd.it/it-was-the-best-of-times-it-was-the-...
I don't care for the "bureaucrats in the OSI" nor the definition of open source, but your argument is complete nonsense.

The fact that llama is not open source does not make it less useful or less appreciated. Nor should anything be considered open source because it is useful or appreciated
Not exactly law enforcement, but a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away we were running local AI to try and spot people lost in the wilderness from drone footage.

I imagine same goes for military now...
I don't really think that this is really possible.

Robots like this are pretty common in the industry (like the mechanical industry) and one costs around 50k and we already produce them at scale.

How much can they lease it for, in your opinion?
> hedgies short laddering to inflict max pain

Probably not unless there is a lot of retail on one side of the 0D options book. Also, it would be a reverse squeeze, not short ladder, which is largely a mythical beast invented to salve day traders.
It would be interesting to know what your account was actually doing if it was doing things you weren't aware of. If YouTube's accusations against your account were accurate, which sounds slightly likely considering you didn't even accurately know what you had uploaded to your own account so possibly maybe your account wasn't as secure as you thought and it could have been doing the things that they accused it of.

But remember it's just an account you had. Separate yourself from the account. Don't take it personally because it's not personal.

Check the login history on your Google account itself and make sure that no locations are logged in or have logged in in the past.

Because, yeah if you weren't aware that your account was posting comments on things that were spam or deceptive then it totally makes sense to close that YouTube account. You might not have been doing anything (yourself actively bad) but also, yeah you weren't doing anything (yourself proactively good).

But yeah let me express my sympathy and empathy to this situation. I had a similar thing happen last year with my twitch account. I got banned due to machine learning auto moderation for an out-of-context chat message that out of context yes it makes sense that I was banned but in context no it does not make sense that I was banned. But The situation ended up fixing itself because twitches moderation policy is that they can't pull favors and unbanned people for a minimum of 90 days. And there was a perfect storm where 90 days after my ban it happened to be my birthday and TwitchCon was going on and I'm friendly with a twitch ambassador so I think they brought something up and it was my birthday and it was 90 days past and with zero fanfare my account was allowed to log in again. But those 90 days was mental torture and hell.

At least you weren't doing what I've heard and seen a lot of people who get banned from YouTube were doing which is the strangest thing to my head, using YouTube the way you are supposed to be using Google photos... By just blasting YouTube with public and or unlisted personal family videos... Which is a highly unadvisable thing to do.
It's not unheard of. The contractors are generally former military.
Is Artalk better than Remark42?
I am trying to decide which one to use for my website.

- https://github.com/ArtalkJS/Artalk
- https://github.com/umputun/remark42/
Thanks for the request! This is on our roadmap, as is supporting Github issues and eventually external documentation/code discussions from Slack, Jira/Linear, etc.
There is an agreement that the price can be offered, that is plenty. As long as the product is in the market there is competition, even if it is not actively being sold, and nothing prevents the seller of finale from changing their mind, as an agreement with a competitior to stop selling their product would most definitely be illegal.
This is very obviously a GPT-authored nonsense article. The author is very much into GPT [1], and this article makes very little sense.

[1] https://x.com/oliviali_/status/1612928271376650240
I think it's circumstantial - do your abstractions make it easier or harder to implement and integrate the sort of features that the application generally requires?

There's sometimes significant use in having some powerful abstractions in place to allow for code reuse and application customisation - but all too often people build fortresses of functionality with no idea how or if it's ever going to be used.

Foresight is useful here; if you can look at new features and break them up into feature specific business logic and generalisable application logic, then similar features can be cleanly integrated with less work in the future.

Sometimes however, the level of customisability far exceeds what is strictly necessary; the complexities involved no longer help, but rather hinder - not only understanding, but feature implementation and integration as well.
Feel free to submit an issue on the repo and we'll get to it!
Well, as I looked at my stock portfolio today, basically anyone who invests in funds even tangentially related to the tech sector, including ones with a bond component, you're in Google, Apple, Nvidia, etc, considerably.
This reminds me a lot of live queries in BeFS.

I like how 30+ year old NT architecture comes back again to solve things in ways that no other major OS has developed since then.
This is amazing! I've been meaning to do something similar for all the Show HN threads, granted it's a much bigger set, but I haven't had the chance to.
Literally three people to do a tub waste, wow, btw just about every tub waste is in a confined area where it's hard to work the necessary pieces in. That is the nature of tub wastes.
Am I a Luddite? I just feel like I don't trust AI because of the hallucinations. It also sort of offends my sensibilities to ask an AI to rewrite something I wrote, and more so the idea that I am receiving things that have gone through that process. I was amazed when I first started checking out AI last year, and it is a great technical achievement. But I don't like the idea that it gets things wrong and so I don't trust it. I've tried asking ChatGPT (admittedly I haven't paid for 4.0) things like summarize a book I know well and it is often wrong.

Copilot in VSCode is really something though. Even if it makes mistakes.
Censorship is a government activity

Moderation is a private entity activity
Palantir has been doing exactly this for more than a decade...
Yes, you get some performance improvements, but I think that comes at the price of security isolation. Think about it, your application probably requires tons of libraries and evolves really quickly compared to the database itself. Additionally, having Admin/root permissions on the server hosting the DB is generally a much bigger deal than granting such permissions on an application server that talks to that DB.

If none of this makes sense, don't worry, that just means you don't work in enterprise...
> find it pretty essential for learning any language

No, REPLs in other languages are not equal to REPLs in Lisp dialects. I bet what you are describing is not the same workflow that an average Clojurian would use. In other languages you typically type directly into the REPL console. With Clojure, you typically connect your editor to a running REPL instance and then manipulate things directly from the source code - you basically write the program, while living inside it - your codebase becomes a living, breathing, maleable entity.

Structural editing has little to do with autocomplete, it's just a way to manipulate expressions - move them around, raise them, transpose them, wrap/unwrap, etc.

I suppose you tried to understand Clojure by looking at the code, and that could be challenging - without proper REPL and structural editing support, it may not be the same joyful experience that many Clojurians know.
Having no solutions may be better than implementing flawed solutions.
The AT protocol is agnostic of Bluesky or Bluesky-specific content.

Different applications using the AT Protocol can publish records that have no relation to Bluesky posts, Bluesky follows, or other Bluesky concepts. For example, https://smokesignal.events/ is an AT protocol app that produces and aggregates its own record types ("events" and "RSVP"s).

So yes, there can't be any meaningful "official protocol client" (because the protocol isn't tied to a specific app).

However, realistically for each app (such as Bluesky or Smoke Signal) there'll usually be the most popular client (and the one we're developing is "official" in the sense that it's one we put on the app store under the Bluesky brand).

People can build other clients for Bluesky, but more importantly, they can build other apps on the protocol which have no relation to Bluesky (but can still ingest Bluesky data if they want to).
> But the US didn't connect many useful strings.

It couldn't, structurally not. In the EU a lot is already harmonized by EU law, but in the US? Congress has been gridlocked for decades now thanks to (predominantly Republican) obstructionism and the states can't be arsed to work on constitutional amendments either.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_labour_law
Heh, a couple of years ago, I had an idea for an "Uber for Experts." It would provide a similar experience to Uber, but instead of a ride, you'd get 30 minutes with a domain expert of your choosing. I never got around to working on it, but there might still be an opportunity for something like this.
Ask HN: How do you improve zero shot summarization?
Hi community, I find summarization one of the most useful applications of AI today. It works for short paragraphs but when long text (like research papers or website-full pages) are used, key details start to be left out. Anyone out there looking into this?
The real crime is that people must still use Yelp and keep them in business.

Another "tech company" that provides 0 value to the world.
TBH I think part of this is for very large accounts, where there is literally just too much engagement to deal with. You kind of need to be able to filter and create your echo chamber to preserve your sanity and use the application the way it is intended to be used (not some kind of updates-only account). Personally I highly doubt I will ever have a problem where I either need to get engaged by with someone (seems unhinged) or need to click extra buttons to disengage from someone unless I'm being pushed to do so by e.g. an excessively rude person or someone who is behaving unhinged at me.

Like these are low stakes. If someone wants to hide polite disagreement, that's cool, they're managing what it means to be their follower and if I don't like it I can stop following them. It has nothing to do with me personally and they're not obligated to receive disagreement because I want them to, that's a weird position to take.
This is a good page showing just how bad last year's fire season was compared to the previous 10 years: https://www.cbc.ca/newsinteractives/features/wildfires-track...
I dislike Discord for the same reason I disliked some IRC networks. There's a lot young people on a powertrip and generally very clique-y behavior. But at least IRC wasn't also run by a huge uncaring tech company known to completely ignore the GDPR (or interpret it in asinine ways) that will eventually run out of VC money and disappear.
>But it doesn't do that, in fact it requires the employers to raise their wages.

Is there evidence to this claim? Even the most recent UBI studies seem to run contrary to this point.

This otherwise borders on a bad-faith post. Yes, McDonalds corporation is different than a franchise, but the profits of the former are obviously tightly coupled to the operations of the latter.

And it’s not a left/right political argument on whether welfare is “bad”. That’s an overly simplistic perspective. It’s about how a particular system is structured and whether that leads to desirable outcomes for society as a whole.
The chances of the statement being complete bullshit nears certainty in most contexts today, so ignoring it as an argument would be a great course of action as such. Unfortunately the person-like thing making the statement, or its backend organization, often has leverage to make it a pain continuing to use the existing, functional, sane, tasteful solution/tool/feature/model/etc. For that reason the threat must often be taken seriously as an attack on the existing order.