skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
One thing to remember is that the old days had much narrower demographics: computers cost a lot more as a function of income, and connectivity was even more expensive in the dialup era so it skewed well-educated, professional, etc. You had cranks, of course, but they were less likely to find a critical mass audience and nobody was trying to use them to reach a large audience.

Also, community norms massively included censorship. BBSes booted people who annoyed the sysops, Usenet had moderation even if it wasn’t very secure and some servers aggressively filtered the feeds they carried for reasons in addition to space consumption.
That reads to me that you have lost weight due to a combination of diet and exercise. Not necessarily metformin.
That already happens. That's why you see waves of bans in certain games based on evaluating/re-evaluating previous post-game data.
You're 'huh' is misplaced.

Some stuff having some BSD code in it is entirely beside the point.
We use a lot more preservatives now than we used to. We typically dont mill grain locally anymore for example, but grain is a near perfect fungal substrate, so we have to douse it in all sorts of antifungal agents so that the grain survives shipping to the phillipines and then the flour needs protection on its journey to whatever country it is going to. (warning, anecdata) Most people i know who have non coeliac gluten intolerance, tolerate gluten just fine. They can eat seitan made using locally milled / grown grain just fine. Seitan is almost pure gluten. The gluten isnt the issue for these folks, myself included. Our over-reliance on pesticides/herbicides/fungicides is, in my opinion, a very plausible explanation that appeared roughly the same time as this spike in issues.
I've never seen it happen either - and I live in Poland, though I haven't seen it in my various visits to China, Germany and the UK either. Who actually does go into the restaurant bathroom specifically to wash their hands before the meal?
Sure, but spying on them in the bathroom doesn't need to be one.
>...mentions or cites particular articles, papers, or books, it always lets the human know that it doesn’t have access to search or a database...

I wonder if we can create a "reverse Google" -- which is a RAG/Human Reinforcement GPT-pedia == Where we dump "confirmed real" information into it that is always current - and all LLMs are free to harvest directly from it in discernment of crafting responses.

For example - it could accept FireHose all current/active streams/podcasts of anything "live" and be like an AI-Tivo for any live streams and it can havea temporal windows that you cans search through "Show me every instance of [THING FROM ALL LIVE STREAMS WATCHED IN THE LAST 24 HOURS] - give me a markdown of the top channels, views, streams, comments - controversy, retweets regarding that topic. sort by time posted.

(Recall that HNer posting the "if youtube had channels:")

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41247023

--

Remember when "Twitter give 'FireHose' directly to the Library of Congress!

Why not firehose GPT-to tha Tap Data'sset

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2017/12/28/the-lib...
For a while it seemed like they might have it out in a cage match, can we just do that instead?
Wait a minute... Censorship requests from the Biden administration before the 2020 election? There was no Biden administration before the 2020 election. Something doesn't quite add up here.
“Outside of NAFTA”
Sellers definitely do care about this. Any seller who wants to maintain any sort of reputation as a high quality has stopped selling on Amazon.

Amazon is now for the “we technically have QA but honestly don’t give a shit” sellers. Not quite alibaba but getting there.
End result: make a few grand. Or are you saying $AMZN does this at scale across every category? Hmm.. yikes.
Weird People
TIL about Git Bisect
If it's not interesting from an engineering perspective then why did the nuclear community write a post-accident report [1] and then update it 7 years later [2]?

Perhaps _now_ it's less interesting as the faulty design has been studied at least twice with computer simulations (and a lot more skepticism on the initial Russian presentation which blamed the operators).

[1]:https://www.iaea.org/publications/3598/summary-report-on-the...

[2]: https://www.iaea.org/publications/3786/the-chernobyl-acciden...
Yes a Land value Tax also would be great
And the choice had consequences to the us/canada relationship (just like the choice not to go to iraq did). Such choices affect us policy to canada down the line.
It's worth repeating for the Nth time that dark matter may be a previously unknown form of hydrogen that doesn't interact with light because the electron is bound in a lower energy state than the traditional ground state. This is based on a novel classical atomic model where electrons are bound in "orbitspheres" see

https://brilliantlightpower.com/theory/
Since front-running is strictly prohibited,

“There is no evidence that he engaged in front-running or any other improper trading activity,” Dodge & Cox said.

After the dude clearly engaged in front-running.
The human element is just as much part of the engineering and design. The plants are designed for humans to operate.
Code has more value than if it can be ran or not. Its 4 decades of problems and their solutions. For anyone who wants to do any work in the music notation space, it could be quite invaluable to go through the lessons learned, to see things from another perspective, especially one that went all the way to production and a long period of commercial viability.
The linking of other tools/initiatives for me is half the value of the post
Thanks for this, I've never thought about it that way before. I've never liked cosmetic structural-looking parts, but I've never thought about the fact that had the architect been instructed to have no cosmetic parts, they might have been included as structural parts anyway, making them impossible to remove!
Contact key verification solves a different problem. Apple still retains the ability to decrypt your messages unless you and the person you are messaging both enable Advanced Data Protection or disable cloud backup entirely (sorry, no third party backup options allowed in the walled garden).
bookshop.org proxies local bookstores. Chances are if you’ve visited a physical bookstore you like they’re selling on there.
New, portable antenna could help restore communication after disasters
Even if not a regulation, a formal certification could help. "This is to certify that batch NNNNN contains no bacteria, viruses, heavy metals, organic poisons from the list available at https://...".

Then you choose which to buy.
When they steal money from someone wealthy enough to have connections.
MITM attacks today are extremely difficult to execute. Most local networks are immune to traditional types of attacks such as arp spoofing/poisoning and wifi networks outside of one’s home have had client isolation enabled by default for at least a decade now.

So this leaves internet scale MITM which means TLAs and other actors at a similar scale.

The TLDR here is that if you can MITM a clear text protocol without any integrity verification then you can alter the message, I’m honestly not entirely sure why is this report worthy on its own.

The issues with STARTTLS are known since the RFC was published.
Are the softwood lumber tarrifs part of nafta? The steel tarrifs?
> a stupid and weird hatred for communism and socialism

Tell me, who grew up in socialism, under communists rule, why this hatred is "stupid and weird"
The hypocrisy is apparent when you notice that the pretty much the only brand of products that miraculously does not have third party reseller listed (and hence escapes third party inventory commingling contamination issues) is the Amazon Basics. [1]

[1] Only Amazon Resale third party resellers are shown https://www.amazon.com/Amazon-Basics-Anodized-Non-stick-Stac...
I think Macdonald's book is very concise and clean compared to others, but it does have some of the same issues that I wrote about in my post. In particular, Definition 6.15 gives one of the problematic definitions of the inner product, and Definition 6.23 gives the same broken definition of dual that has an inconsistent orientation and fails to extend to the degenerate metrics of projective algebras. Has also says, at the bottom of page 111, that the Hodge dual can't be defined directly in the exterior algebra, which is not correct.
> Oberon+ that compiles to (terrible) CIL

Why so arrogant? The CIL is good enough. It's a promise of the ECMA-335 to cope even with unoptimized CIL, and Mono indeed includes many optimization steps. Your arguments - especially concerning SIMD and other features supported by CoreCLR - are absolutely not relevant in this context. CIL is always the same (regardless whether the CIL was generated by your big C# or my small Oberon compiler), and if I feed unoptimized CIL to CoreCLR, it still has the opportunity to make use of the SIMD features of the given CPU if need be. As already discussed it's even more interesting to base the performance comparison on unoptimized CIL, because by the end of the day we all want to know how good the optimizers of Mono or CoreCLR are.

And you didn't answer my question, so I assume you're working for Microsoft or some of their affiliates, and your claims are obviously biased by this.
Perhaps then the ones that did take the trouble to vote would be well informed and thoughtful.
hi, i put this together.

i just created a new nextjs project and used the generate prompt to create the react components (with shadcn) and then tweaked things using chat in cursor. is there anything specific piece you wanted to know more about?
Well of course it matters everywhere in Rust, the borrow checker is how Rust accomplishes those things. It is novel. It's an approach to memory and data-race safety that does not require a GC, and it has relatively low overhead.

The problem with move semantics in C++ is the lack of borrow checking, but simple programs (e.g. a lot of the coreutils realistically) very little transfers of ownership are actually needed, because the programs are just so relatively simple. Meanwhile, GC'd languages can usually ignore this altogether, at the cost of some overhead.
would love to read the totally different approach
Second that. He's got some of the highest production quality YouTube has to offer. High effort content.

Here's the one that got me hooked:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSS6yAMZF78
here's one more for the list :) https://jarek.lupin.ski/tape-deck/
The patsies are the amazon marketplace sellers. The public and regulars have to play wack-a-mole on the thousands of disposable marketplace sellers and Amazon can act shocked shocked every time any particular marketplace seller is found to be a fraud.
I know newer reactor designs are much safer than Chernobyl at least, but they haven't solved the problem of some people having inflated egos.
I did read the article and still have the same question.

To show that I read it I can even quote the line where they talk about the architect’s motivations: “Venturi wanted the foyer to have the feel of a mighty crypt, leading upstairs to the galleries, so it was a subsidiary space—the beginning of a journey, not a destination.”

And still I have the same question? Why would those two false collumn make the space a “subsidiary” space? (Or to put it differentl why would the addition of those two collumns make it more of a subsidiary space than the fact that it is just the foyer of a gallery?)

And then the further question is why did they place the false collumns unevenly? If i see it right they form a pair with the real collumns, instead of being evenly distributed in between them. Which is… a choice.
Tax on unrealized gain is total BS. It's BS right in the name. Why don't they just say collateral assets are taxable, so the loan pegged on these assets will get taxed. The way they are going with is pure stupidity.
There are too many apps tied to some real-world thing that only support iOS and Android. Consider banking apps for mobile check deposit, or apps that let you remote start your car. And even if you were willing to go without those conveniences, consider the SeatGeek app. I've been to shows where the only way to get tickets was with that app - there was no paper option and no Web option. And even though emulators like Waydroid exist, a lot of those kinds of apps implement things like SafetyNet or Play Integrity, basically to intentionally refuse to work in any environment not officially blessed by Google.
Your example would be a failure on a DIBCAC high audit, if they sampled the professor's system. In DIBCAC medium audit, the only thing they look at is your System Security Plan (SSP). The article sounds like it referred to a Basic, self-assessment, because it was self-entered.

Self-assessment are attested to that the information provided are in good faith, that the SSP is developed, documented, and maintained, and that for identified missing or failing controls there are plan of action and milestones (POA&Ms) are created.

> Note that even the Georgia Tech response is not disputing the security facts. It’s simply stating that there wasn’t anything confidential about this because the government published the research. Which of course has no bearing on whether or not they lived up to their contractual security and confidentiality requirements.

This is exactly what I was trying to explain. My apologies I failed. Compliance with NIST SP 800-171, as required under DFARS clause 252.204-7012, is primarily focused on systems that store, process, or transmit CUI. However, intermediary systems that could impact the security of those systems or the CUI they handle are also in scope.

Although contracts can call out additional things to be treated as CUI, it have never seen it. Too much paperwork on the Gov side, and creates headaches for contractors.

And, this is where the rub comes in. Primary systems and resources no one argues about. The problem of scope comes in with intermediary systems, shared services and infrastructure, and boundary systems.

For example, if the CUI data is encrypted in transit, traveling through a private WAN, managed by a third party, does the third party needs to also comply? When remote government workers connect to a government site with their government furnished equipment on public WiFi accessing CUI, where is the edge of that environment that is in scope for audit?

Again, if they were clearly negligent, let's pillory them. My conjecture is that this a low hanging fruit to be vengeful. The rules and regs are so convoluted and out of order, there are entire industries (plural) just for getting to understand the requirements.

And, if we really want to get into a mess, I am going to be crude but mention the four letter word - CMMC.
I am not going to try to change your outlook to be more positive, but you have to admit that it’s somewhat (tragically) amusing that we can find ourselves on a website full of people who are extremely technically capable (and highly intelligent), have access to devices that can connect to billions of others devices instantly, and can profit from said system allowing them to better their lives, yet this same community can only dwell on the negative of their situation instead of the positive.

I think, when you’re very smart, you are just many steps ahead of the average person in pattern recognition. You can literally store more information and pattern match against it, so you’re going to pattern match up the power hierarchy and think about things that have a negative impact on you that you can never directly affect without traversing up the hierarchy. If most people here (not saying you specifically) would instead just focus on “what is the biggest problem in my life that I have complete control over?”, I think they’d find that focusing on the greater powers that be has little practical consequence since they’re just not at the level where they can exert influence over those powers. There is almost certainly a path to local maxima, and from there, a greater and greater maxima.
A CSV file has sub expressions?

Even if it has commas in quotes, it's a comma seen in the state 'collecting text'. There is no need for anything more complicated than an FSM. Maybe there is in leetcode. One character of pushback is not a 'stack' unless you are answering a Google interviewer.
"A colony of ants is more than just an aggregate of insects that are living together. One ant is no ant." - E. O. Wilson
I don't know but I think current course is unsustainable.
Guess, but GPU drivers have been known to change shaders being sent to the GPU for certain games, to fix things and increase performance, it's possible this could be detected as some kind of cheating by the anti-cheat.
i pushed an update for the images to actually use an object store instead of just from the project. thanks for checking it out!
>It means you binary bigger

False premise, as size tool shows RVA20(RV64GC) binaries were already smallest among 64bit architectures.

Code gets smaller still (rather than larger) with newer extensions such as B in RVA22.

As of recently, the same is true in 32bit when comparing rv32 against former best (thumb2). But it was quite close before to begin with.
That's true... But... The fact is, I can't read the page. Can't tell what the project is, because I can't read the page.

The demo should at least have a noscript tag, to tell me why I can't read the page.
By any chance do you know where the quality folks have gone?
Like it or not, team dynamics are a part of engineering.
GP said “ Maryland is so bad…”

You made the same point I was making, not sure if you realize that.
I believe you've overlooked some important factors. First, Caltech puts a lot more effort into recruiting top women than into recruiting top men.

So if you are a top man but are not considering applying to Caltech Caltech probably won't reach out to try to change your mind. If you are a top women they are much more likely to reach out to you, maybe even sending someone to visit and personally pitch applying to Caltech. This is going to tend to raise the average quality of the set of women who end up applying to Caltech, so we should expect to see a higher acceptance rate for women.

Second, Caltech has been doing this for a long time. It was an all male school until around 1970 then went coed. I don't know when they started actively trying to recruit women, but they were doing it by the late '70s when I was a student there. At that time incoming classes were around 15% women and the percentage was slowly rising. It has been a long slow rise to where they are today.

That gives us at least 45 years of data on the results of these policies and as far as I know no one has ever found any indication that the women of Caltech are any less meritorious than the men. If they had went from 15% women to 50% in a few years then it would probably require lowering standards, but doing it over 45+ years can plausibly be explained just by the recruiting efforts.

Third, wanting to have more women isn't a mere matter of optics. Most undergraduates live on campus. For the first couple of years students are generally required to do so. But Caltech is a very hard school. Most undergraduates have little to no time to have any kind of social life that is not on campus. And they are around the age of peak horniness. When the gender ratio is out of whack in such an environment it causes a lot of stress (at least for the heterosexual students), for both men and women, which can greatly affect academic performance.

Also, as far as imposter syndrome goes, a sizable majority of the men at Caltech probably have it too. Most of them were at the top of the class for their whole life, and without having to put a lot of effort into it. School was always easy. Then they get to Caltech where they have to work their assess off just to reach average. It's hard to avoid getting some imposter syndrome.
I found someone requesting that it be added to Debian:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/%3Ca%20href=%22bugreport.cgi...

So far no one has mentioned licensing being an issue.
> I don't see the value to Boeing, or its traumatized shareholders, in continuing the losses.

Perhaps the value is to show that they can actually stick with, and follow through, on things.

If they become known for cutting-and-running, why would anyone trust them for anything?
> Every message board and chatroom (bbs, forums, irc, icq, aol, et all) on the young internet was virtually uncensored and a 100% free for all

That’s nostalgia - the BBS world, Usenet, IRC, etc. absolutely had norms and people who violated them were routinely blocked. Where I grew up there were some BBSes run by e.g. evangelical Christians who aggressively restricted the FidoNet channels they carried and the files allowed to be uploaded, and later some of the business-focused ISPs sharply limited things like Usenet (which had its own moderation system). When I ran a FidoNet node, I had to agree to community standards with the boards I peered with because the operators didn’t want to deal with certain types of hassle.

What was different is federation: back in the early online era, someone who was booted off of one system would go somewhere else. The problem with services like Twitter is that they’re centralized and so when people break their terms of service don’t want to go somewhere else, so they complain about censorship when they really mean “free hosting and promotion”.
Does it really need help? I struggle to imagine a scenario where one would consider MAUI not supporting Linux to be an issue (if we discard superficial bad faith concern) when Avalonia, Uno or, if you care about Linux as the main target, Gir.Core exist.

And, at the end of the day, you have a tool with an extremely rich FFI capability so whatever is available from C you can use as well.
Can't we find better ways at pacing ourselves than meetings? I think we can.
I created this learning platform for fun and educational purposes! it's free! Enjoy it!
The fact that telex was immensely faster, lower bandwidth, operated on terrible PSTN networks (not regular telephone networks) with absurdly low quality, could work internationally with no special hand-off equipment or special fax lines being required, and had multicast and store-and-forward built-in to the protocol and had an image printer protocol extension that was superior in quality to fax and again, required no special equipment for international transmission, could work even when the mains electricity was down (phones and telexes were on separate networks), teleprinters could be powered directly from the telex connection, could work over low bandwidth ham radio connections, and is still in use today in certain parts of the world where it is critical the information gets through, there's a reason that a lot of companies still used the telex well into the early part of the 21st century.

Not meant as a explaining type of response, merely as a "this is an interesting piece of useless information."
Its a consequence of NAFTA arguably.
Probably to demonstrate that the problems are solvable as opposed to the somewhat common view that the web is insurmountable?
They do, but the financial impact to you is much less.

Example

- Let's say you bough a home for $100k
- Property taxes are 1% of home value

In Year 1, you owe $1k in property taxes.

Let's say (dramatically) that property values double in Year 2.

- Now, you're $100k home is worth $200k

So your property taxes in Year 2 are now $2k.

-----

With taxing your unrealized gains at the nominal Federal & State income tax bracket.

- Your Federal Income tax rate might be 30% (dependent upon your earnings)
- Your State Income tax rate might be 10%

So you have a combined 40% tax rate on "earnings"

Now in that example of your home going from $100k to $200k in Unrealized gains, you'd have to cut a check for $40K!

That's huge and most people wouldn't even have that kind of cash to pay.