skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This seems really cool and I'm excited to play around with it once it's up and running properly again. These type of things are my favorite applications of LLMs.

A while back I made something similar in the form of an incremental "clicker" game where you split things ad infinitum: https://lantto.github.io/hypersplit/
I’m curious how frequently people actually encounter foreign key constraints in production.

I’m 10 years in and have only ever seen it once
> Lovely article, though honestly getting those prerequisites also takes a lot of time, effort and either motivation or discipline in ample amounts.

Exactly. It's like saying that winning a marathon is easy, you just need to run fast enough.

The entire problem is that many people won't be able to learn the prerequisites of advanced math. There are always exceptional cases, like someone really smart who just totally slacked off during school because they spent all their time building apps or websites or tinkering with games or electronics. Or someone who was never given the opportunity to learn certain subjects because they had to work as a teen because their parents died etc. But the vast majority of people are presented with the prereq material they just can't absorb it.
But this very same situation with Pavel's arrest aligns with your criteria of "authority-pissing" tech.

Have you checked the source of Telegram? https://telegram.org/apps#source-code
And it's good for your eyesight.
Apparently this is a legacy holdover and you should choose the smallest size in the bios. Fully unified memory is the norm, you don’t need to do the memory splitting that way.
Yeah that might be a good selling point for Discord. So far I haven’t really felt at home in Discord’s UI paradigm, but I also haven’t found any ”must-have” communities there either (for my tastes).
where did you get that text? the page linked doesn't say "linux" anywhere
He's also mistaking the balance of forces here. He's believing that being calm and peaceful would mean that the West is lacking willpower. But nothing could be less true. Maintaining the welfare state requires a lot of willpower. And we know today that capitalism is not for the weaks. But he does not get it.
Devil’s advocate:

Fighting games are just better versions of Rockem Sockem Robots.

And 4X games could be fancier versions of Settlers of Catan.
Yes but those are probably backdoored by USA so ok.
macos is an actual operating system, a variant of mach
On my Signal app screen, I have Chats, Calls and Stories. I could probably do without Stories. Periodically it prompts me for my PIN.

Other than that it just works
So money laundering, drugs, terrorism and child porn plus some others for good measure. Were they deliberately trying to invoke all four horsemen of the infocalypse, or is that a side effect?

Had they sticked with just one I may have been less likely to view it this as an authoritarian attack on privacy and freedom of speech.
Wasn't the Silk Road founder jailed for something similar?

He provided the platform.
This is such an ignorant comment I am really disappointed at reading this here.

Besides the protocol used by Telegram being publicly available so you can easily confirm in 5 minutes that what you're saying is completely wrong, but you're also saying that law enforcement can totally see all those plain text messages hosted by Telegram, yet they choose to be really upset about it anyway despite it being, according to you, the best possible honeypot ever created with all criminal activity readily available for their peruse. Why, I ask you, would law enforcement want to stop such an app??? They would be completely silent about it and enjoy catching all criminals in it who are "ignorantly" thinking their messages are safe, wouldn't they??

Given the amount of baseless comments like yours on this topic, I can only imagine there's a concerted effort here to misinform everyone to make Telegram look bad so actual criminals move away from it to some more law enforcement-friendly platform. I have conflicting feelings about that, as perhaps the intention is noble, but I can never agree with misleading people by spreading misinformation and plain lies.
I just use tar xf file. The a option is probably only required when creating a tarball.
Not sure this link is working.

Maybe https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/xbox/forum/all/what-is-t...
This is not about encryption, it’s about lack of cooperation with the authorities, and breaking French law as a French citizen.
> you'll wait about 17 seconds before token generation starts, which isn't awful

Let’s be honest, it might not be awful but it’s a nonstarter for encouraging local LLM adoption and most will prefer to pay to pay pennies for api access instead (friction aside).
Most social media marketing tools are sold with the express intent of spam acceleration. Before TikTok, there were numerous tools for FB/Twitter focused on scheduling posts, or auto-generating posts based on [[current hot topic]].

This tool is tame compared to those. It just centers a 16:9 video and crops it to fit better in portrait mode, while showing the uncropped video below so people can see the full frame as well.
Exactly! That was more relevant and critical than his opinion on Google's smart working. Plus, his view of EU and his attempts to "fix the AI Act".
Nah. It's been painfully clear to nerds for a long time that sportsball players are much more highly respected and like than eggheads.
If a warrant exists they hand over all your data and even wiretap you.
Peanut allergy prevalence in India seems to be 0.3%, while in the western countries it's 1.5-3%.
I can't open the telegram.com links, blocked at work :/

But the Arxiv paper says:

"We stress that peer clients never communicate directly: messages always go through a server, where they are stored to permit later retrieval by the recipient. Cloud chat messages are kept in clear text, while secret chat messages are encrypted with the peers’ session key, which should be unknown to the server."

So it doesn't appear to be encrypted-at-rest, but without reading the telegram documentation I can't verify that.
I think they don't support cross-device syncing or automatic backups of E2EE chats, so it's about minimising friction by default. Telegrams main focus is UX, unlike Signal which prioritizes security at the expense of UX.
UK's largest mobile network tells parents: don't give under-11s smartphones
I think your subtle arguments are wasted on EU's decision to stop the spread of misinformation and manipulation. It's that simple for them. Black and white. Us vs them. Don't think too much, you are taken care of by your "representatives" ...
If a service provider can see plain text for a messaging app between the END users, that is NOT end-to-end encryption, by any valid definition. Service providers do not get to be one of the ends in E2EE, no matter what 2019 Zoom was claiming in their marketing. That's just lying.
I second the request for more information like the list of classes with code example.
Similar in visual appearance, difference in design.

https://medium.com/kickstarter/the-explosion-artist-5db66a99...

> Aside from these functional benefits, Mine Kafon has an undeniable aesthetic beauty. The tumbling dandelion-like structure recalls Dutch sculptor Theo Jansen’s Strandbeests, similarly fashioned from repurposed industrial materials and eerily imbued with life by the wind. Hassani’s work even caught the eye of MoMA’s Senior Curator of Design, Paola Antonelli, who included Mine Kafon in the museum’s 2014 Design and Violence show. More exhibitions around the world followed, and the project became something of a viral sensation, with the elegance of the idea — and Hassani’s inspiring story — propelling the pressing issue of landmines through social media and beyond.

> Mine Kafon also garnered attention from the Dutch Ministry of Defense, which evaluated the design’s effectiveness in their test minefields, ultimately determining that the project was not practical for operational use but still valuable as a tool for raising awareness.

---

It has some issues with following topological contours and one not getting blown up isn't a "this area is clear" (or even a deterministic "this path through this area is clear"). One getting blown up means it found one mine (possible some more if its durable) ... and then you need to clean up the scrap, but this returns to the "you don't have a positive signal of this area is completely free from mines."
LTSC is meant for enterprise environments. It has a 10 year support window. Microsoft is not known for breaking its promises to businesses.
i don't think that platform providers of encrypted messaging should be required to ensure that none of the images being sent contain CP.
It's Kit Klarenberg of Grayzone. If he claims X, you should believe the opposite with much better than even odds. It could have been a hint to you when the news source of your choice attributes everything in the world to the CIA.
There are many technical problems to overcome, including having hardware that can successfully roam through cluttered spaces and navigate buildings with multiple floors...

...For now, the technology is going to be incredibly expensive for both Apple to build and for consumers to buy. The company is also going to need more talent, including many more engineers, to bring something truly meaningful to market.

Why can't Apple acquire Boston Dynamics? BD may have solved lot of these problems already, and to boot would have lot of patents, which Apple would be glad to have. BD in 2020 was acquired by Hyundai for $1.1B.
I was a Solus user back when Ikey left. It was highly unusual, maintainer team had no insight, and frankly as a user it left a fairly bad taste.

But, Ikey had his reasons, and as I've grown up a bit over the years, I realize it is okay. Other maintainers picked up the tab pretty well, and for all its worth, quite a few of those maintainers have joined Ikey on this new distro, which signals a reconciliation.

Combined with other comments, I'd say what happened at Solus was imperfect, could have been communicated better, but probably still couldn't be avoided. Such is life.
The thesis of the book (I haven't read it but am familiar with the core ideas) is that our arbitrary distinction between pristine wilderness and human civilization is itself the problem. It's not the goal at all. Pristine wilderness is a modern myth that never existed - humans have always actively managed the landscape to our advantage, and we in turn considered ourselves a part of that landscape. It's only recently that we've developed this insane idea that we are distinct from nature, and that humanity "in here" exists apart from the purity of nature "out there". That isolation is purely imagined - it's as factually wrong as it is spiritually barren and ecologically destructive.
> You are hilariously hostile here, I don't get it.

I apologise if it came out hostile. That was not my intention. I was in a bit of hurry when I made the edit, and I just trying to expand my comment in response to your edit, and explain that non-I/O and non-disk SIGBUS errors sometimes look exactly like disk and filesystem errors that return EIO (not just signum being SIGBUS, but also si_code being set to BUS_ADRERR, etc.), so looking at the siginfo_t fields alone wouldn't be enough to diambiguate.

Then there's the address field, which can be probably be used in combination with parsing /proc/self/maps, but my point in that comment was that the information on the manpage alone wouldn't have helped people trying to implement a handler correctly.

In any case, I already described a scenario where crashing would be the wrong thing to do IMO, which you seemed to ignore. Even in scenarios where crashing is reasonable, I'm sure there's a solution for every edge case that I would bring up, but I never said that it was impossible, so I'm not sure why asking me to list every possible edge case is relevant when my point was just that there are edge cases, and that you'd need to consider them (and they would be different for different apps), thus making an implementation not trivial. That doesn't mean that it's necessarily difficult, just that it might be a more complex solution when compared to dealing with a failing VFS operation.

As it seems that we've reached an impasse, I'll just say that simplicity depends on the context and is sometimes a matter of personal taste. I don't have anything against mmap, and I was only trying to argue that there's a trade-off, but you are of course free to disagree and use mmap everywhere if that works for you.

I don't think I have anything more to add to what I already said, and I'm sorry again if you felt personally attacked, or that I had something against mmap and trying to spread FUD.
Sideways

Back To The Future

Cinema Paradiso

Spaceballs

Up In Smoke (Cheech & Chong)

The Incredibles

Indiana Jones 1-3

Indiana Jones: Kingdom Of The Crystal Skull (Rifftrax only)

Falling Down

Office Space

Man Bites Dog

Nothing To Lose

Idiocracy

Space Mutiny (MST3k)

Goodfellas

Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home

Groundhog Day

Barbie

Full Metal Jacket

Mallrats

Flight Of The Navigator

The Founder

One Hour Photo

---

I'm pretty certain I've rewatched Sideways more than any other film.
No doubt that is true, and presumably Cory Doctorow has written some article making that seem like the only concern. The alternative makes it difficult to enforce all kinds of laws, though.
> Why are these service providers being punished for what their users do?

There is a legal distinction here between what happens on your platform despite your best efforts (what you might call "incidental" use) vs what your platform is designed specifically to do or enable.

Megaupload is a perfect example. It was used to pirate movies. Everyone knew it. The founders knew it. You can't really argue it's incidental or unintended or simply that small amount that gets past moderation.

Telegram, the authorities will argue, fails to moderate CSAM and other illegal activity to the point that it enables it and profits from it, which is legally indistinguishable from specifically designing your platfrom for it.

Many tech people fall into a binary mode of thinking because that's how tech usually works. Either your code works or it doesn't. You see it when arguments about people pirating IP being traced to a customer. Tech people will argue "you can't prove it's me". While technically true, that's not the legal standard.

Legal standards relay on tests. In the ISP case, authorities will look at what was pirated, was it found on your hard drive, was the activity done when you were home or not and so on to establish a balance of probabilities. Is it more likely that all this evidence adds up to your guilt or that an increasingly unlikely set of circumstances explains it where you're innocent?

In the early days of Bitcoin I stayed away (to my detriment) because I coudl see the obvious use case of it being used for illegal stuff, whichh it is. The authorities don't currently care. Bitcoin however is the means that enables ransomware. When someone decides this is a national security issue, Bitcoin is in for a bad time.

Telegram had (for the French at least) risen to the point where they considered it a serious enough issue to warrant their attention and the full force of the government may be brought to bear on it.
From my casual observations, split screen stuff is either reactions, or a way to beat copyright detection.
your understanding is based on what? i would assume this is just standard unsealed warrant like they have in the US
It's at least https encrypted and stored encrypted on multiple telegram servers.

So technically telegram could provide that data.

I guess that's the angle.
this is awesome! and the maze it produced looks great! yeah, the halving-dimensions thing is a form of what i did in the golang thing i linked

i'm pretty comfortable with prolog, and i'll take a look at your code later :)
The service sounds awkward enough in practice that I'm not sure why anyone who didn't need it would want to use it.
It's very bizarre to see all these comments downplaying this, or implying the lack of E2EE by default somehow makes it less attractive to the average user than something like Signal.

Most people care about usability and interconnectivity first and foremost because the majority of their messaging activities are not so sensitive that they feel the need to sacrifice those things for mandatory E2EE. Call that shortsighted if you like, but it's far more common than this "encryption or bust" mindset around here.

If signal or some messaging platform could find a way to be E2EE capable all the time, with all the same usability and design as telegram, without unnecessary restrictions on users, and without it being a completely walled off garden from which your data can never be self-extracted, it would win this argument.

Same goes for things like Tutanota and a lot of these other data prisons that are cropping up which create privacy through taking away user agency.

Until then users will pick what they want for their own needs. Telegram met those needs for many.
When the vehicle disintegrates on reentry like a shuttle sometimes does, who gets the platinum?
really? we seal warrants in the US all the time - we don't want people who we are trying to apprehend to always know ahead of time we are trying to apprehend them
On managing money, given you mention time and stress, have you considered the Bogleheads approach (e.g. VTSAX+Cash/Bonds and chill)?
https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Getting_started
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41341353

920 comments, 20 hours ago
Signal doesn’t have public groups/channels. Moderation obligations only apply to public dissemination. If I send an email to a private mailing list, the involved email providers have no obligation to moderate its contents.
Just look at the automatic closed captions on any news or sports broadcast, or enable them on a YouTube video. They are pretty good, but there are still some obvious errors that you'll see within just a few minutes.
True, though as always that comes with tradeoffs of its own.
So free speech should be regulated like alcohol sales?
I think the difference is that Signal can't provide the data but Telegram could but didn't want to.
I feel like your choice of phrasing downplays the fact that the strandbeest is created by the guy the principle is named after.
This looks nice, I got a Clockwork uConsole to scratch a similar itch. The external mount is a curious adaptation!
I suspect it's probably better to shift the sick days earlier in life. We probably can't significantly reduce the total. There are hundreds of endemic upper respiratory viruses and we all eventually get infected with most of them. It's just a matter of time. Our immune systems generally degrade as we age, so over the long run it's probably better to get infected when we're younger so that we can build immunity that protects us when we're older.
No, but you can transpile (incredibly trivial) Rust programs into Coq that can be than formally verified to give a defined output for all possible inputs.
I suspect that it is legal fears tbh - it is almost certain that if AMD or anyone else tried to make some kind of CUDA compatibility, nVidia would pretty fiercely sue them into the ground. This is almost certainly why both Intel and AMD bailed on ZLUDA.
> Today, it’s the political right that embraces materialism (he assumes left) and the left that understands the biblical sacrifice.

I agree with you about today's right, but disagree strongly about the left. The left is, if anything, even more materialistic than the right. The belief that providing enough material goods will fix all problems is behind the left's disastrous push to have governments provide everything to everyone: welfare, health care, open borders, etc.
If it reduces the strength of the child's immune system, this may rebound in horrible ways
The reduction is in the rideshares. Due to their launch rate and low internal costs, SpaceX is able to offer a fixed schedule launch capability for small payloads to popular orbits.

These small payloads individually have to pay much less than what they would've had to pay in the past, and get a guaranteed ride to space without fussing over the primary mission's needs. As a result SpaceX have eaten up most of the small launch market (eg no messes like having the batteries die on the pad because the only way to get an affordable ride is to fly on the maiden launch of SLS and Boeing isn't flexible enough to be able to charge them)

They even have a price calculator and scheduling information on their site for these.
i think in actual practice you will rarely get contempt for refusing to testify or taking the fifth for questions that could only tenuously implicate yourself in practice.
Our home appliances (and industrial robots) are very optimized specific devices. Don't get me wrong. A washing machine or refrigerator is magical relative to the prior art. But there's nothing even on the horizon that remotely replaces my housekeeper coming every few weeks (and even she requires me organizing some things ahead of time).
You're right; I should have said, "not allowed unless you have the connections."

Of course, as I understand it, if your background was too bourgeois, then your application for Party membership was rejected.
Rook/Ceph is the standard solution
I think they had money to make up to 4 flights. Looks like they got some money even before the flight 4, but not sure how much compared to their own expenses.
There is a simpler explanation, those providers are controlled by Western governments (read US)
BuffDB is a Rust library to simplify multi-plexing on edge devices
Both of the therapists I've seen made it clear up front that they refuse to deal with insurance companies, and expect payment up front. The health insurance industry would make Franz Kafka proud.

That said, I was surprised when I mailed a bunch of bills to my insurer, and requested reimbursement. I figured I was probably wasting my time, but why not see what happens.

Anyway, they mailed me a check. The bills were higher than what my insurance would cover, but my insurance decided to cover a substantial portion.
It's hit and miss, for the same reason Google is (and increasingly more so). If you try and search for 'langchaingo' then you might get lucky if you add enough into the query to say you're working with go, but otherwise it'd just see 'langchain'.

Google is pretty much useless for the same reason.

They're not actually more intelligent, they're more stupid, so you have to provide more and more context to get desired results compared to them just doing more exact searching.

Ultimately they just want you to boost their metrics with more searches and by loading more ads with tracking, so intelligently widening results to do that is in their favour.
It's such a gamble for Apple to move out of the safe space they are in. They have such total ecosystem control, such ability to set the terms of use however they want with digital technology. But as soon as they start building more mechanical physical systems that exist int eh real world, there's far less ability to maintain that pristine veneer.

Whether Apple can find a path to being a less perfectionist company is a big question in my mind, that bounds all their ambitions.
Without much thought? Without much thought I would say that the recent experience of preventing children from catching communicable diseases have shown it to be a devil's bargain and we would be wise to keep their immune systems constantly exercised
Sorry, I should have been clearer in my question, I wanted to know about A deref to B re-ref to &B.

ameliaquining awnsered my question and you modulated my opinion, that pattern is can be idiomatic when the principle of minimal surprises is respected.
Looks like a trick, because it is not even better to give 12s or even 14s a smartphone.
I need his heart. Please give it back.