skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
A big thing is the rise and rise of bullshitters. Wall to wall buzzwords and made up stories about what they did in their last job. Leetcode filters a lot, but it also filters out, just as many, if not more, people who can actually do what they say.
It is the same div soup for a screen reader, because there is no behavior attached to those new tags.
They can not be a landmark, there are not marked as headings, they have no roles.
Just a container with a text.
And to attach the behavior you need to use javascript.
So without js it wont work.

Why bother and try yo create half-baked non working solution if you can just use html?

Well, it easier to style, maybe. But hey, there is a class attribute.
> I’m pretty sure others have other gripes with the “streamlined experience”.

Christmas tree UX. Navigating the UI at places is like playing a RPG with all the weird intricate click paths.
Yes, it’s the games stupid.

There is one group of people who are willing to spend ludicrous amounts of money for this product, and that’s gamers.

Unfortunately Apple does not and has never understood games as art. They only care about casual games that bring in the $$.

Apple also has beefs with Khronos, NVIDIA, and Epic.

I had thought that when VP came out, Apple would make amends with the gaming industry particularly Epic because they really need Epic’s on their side for VP to succeed. Who is going to build games for this thing in the best engine if Apple can ban Epic’s developer account at any time?

Nope. App Store revenue comes first. It’s just the same as the iPad Pro. Great hardware squandered because of App Store rent seeking.
We do have vehicle safety standards in the real world. The government can mandate vehicles meet certain standards, not just levy taxes.
Link should be this one: https://rks.global/en/surveillance-state-research/en/surveil...

Current link by Meduza is just a short summary of a podcast episode.
how does this compare to gokrazy?
Real deals aren't made over a zoom call. They just aren't. That's why they still fly there even though they are well aware of how to use zoom.
Elon Musk Got Tangled Up in Blue
Why don't you just use old.reddit.com ? Works great for me.
Intel Foundry Achieves Major Milestones
> the writers don't want to repeat themselves because they were taught that it's "poor writing."

Yes! As you say, it massively depends on whether you are writing fiction or non-fiction. In any sort of formal document, especially technical reports, etc, the reader should never have to spend time working out what the author means. I used to be a doc reviewer in a previous life, and lost count of the number of times docs used different terms to mean the same thing, especially where multiple authors were involved, or a single author was writing different sections at different times.

General plea: If you value your readers, please, please get someone else to check a doc to look for these sorts of problems. If multiple authors are involved, always get someone on the team (a lead author?) to do this check even before submitting it for formal review.
The fact that there is even a term like "Climate change denial", means that it feasible to deny "the science" (science is about doubt), because the climate scientists actually can't prove anything, fundamentally. They only have stats, and stat models, and there is no way, at our technological level to even model a single mole of carbon 12 (12 grams of atoms), so you think they can model an entire planetary system? Accurately? No, it's not possible.

They also like to muddy the waters, climates change, because climates aren't even a thing, but an aggregate, obviously. Anthropogenic climate change, is what's being questioned, and that there is no certainty that it will cause disasters any more so than if there was still 300ppm CO2 in the atmosphere. Maybe 400ppm is bad, doesn't seem so tho, we are living the experiment.

BUT also, I would bet Air Conditioners are far worse for the planet than 400ppm CO2, even if they act together. ACs, are, absolutely abysmal thermodynamically. Heating up one space to make another space colder temporarily, with high likelihood of CO2 release.

Slight tangent. Have you heard the sixth Dimmu Borgir album? Good stuff. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFRwNYPsHwY

I wonder will it generate any discussion, or just be castigated via downvotes, your choice.
Wanna say me and my friend keep loosing this wonderful book.
> I still don't know how to switch to the JSON-only view the few times that I need it.

Everything can be searched in VSCode, not just the settings page. Just do CTRL+SHIFT+P and type.
Like this:

https://i.imgur.com/w2sTSPA.png

Like tredre3 said there's also a button on the top right corner of settings, but I tend to prefer to start directly into json mode through the command palette.

Being able to find any sort of action with the palette just by typing is hands down the best UI design I've experienced in software. It's not new, Unity had it in the older Ubuntu distributions, but it's unfortunately not seen often enough and Ubuntu lost it when they moved to Gnome.

The palette search box also has the smart design of placing to the top functions you use the most through the palette, so if you open the json settings a few times it'll pop up at the top before you even finish typing the word "settings".
After a while, your interactions with the palette make its UI feel very personalized to your needs.
It really depends on what hardware you are working with.

HiDPI support is more than a bit sketchy still, especially on nvidia, and especially if you attach multiple screens to the computer and don't want all of them to have the same scaling.

Webcam support is also still quite sketchy. It'll work, but actually configuring the thing to e.g. select the resolution or adjust the white balance, feels like a regression to 2004.
Before this hit the news - how many of the now-angry people had previously demonstrated any real interest in the George Orwell archives? Or had actually worked to preserve any collection of historical documents?

It's real easy to sit on your ass, while bitterly complaining that a whole legion of Somebody Elses is not working 25-hour days, for free, to make the world conform to your whims.
I can understand the surprise so I'm not sure why you're downvoted. Companies like Coinbase and Binance, who never stole a cent from their users (as opposed to crooks like Alameda/FTX/SBF), are extremely successful.

Whether or not one appreciate cryptocurrencies, these companies are worth tens of billions. It's not a surprise that they invest in other companies.
I lost a lot of respect for science when my advisor explained that it didn't matter that the cutting edge work I wanted to extend was being done by Some Guy On A Forum, I wasn't allowed to to cite them, and a pity too, because it was probably correct.
In the US it's outsourced. Secret servers stashed along the infrastructure backbone, monitored by "contractors" in isolated facilities who fiddle with your YouTube feeds, search results, and digital broadcasts for fun.

I'm less worried about surveillance than who these unaccountable, clearly not the government meddlers are.
Clojure is the girl you should have married but didn’t.
> How do you prevent movement to an equilibrium where reviewers give favorable reviews to the reviewers of their own papers?

Peer-review of peer review. If all peer review is public, then people can analyse the trends.
Obligatory "I stopped using Reddit when they killed Apollo" comment here -- I miss /r/askhistorians, and the joy of someone showing up to comment on something who is an expert in the field.
Yeah, exactly. I’m not sure what happens after I click “Delete and Report Junk” on every spammy-looking sms and iMessage I get, but I imagine the iMessage reports go into some ML blackbox and hopefully contribute to banning the spammer.

I understand the op was trying to do a good deed, but if I saw an unexpected message like that I would definitely hit “Delete and Report Junk” instead of just “Delete”.
"Everything" is a filename search engine for Windows
> Everybody would be too nervous and quadruple-thinking “is this message worth a cent?"

I think that's well below the threshold people would care.

The problem is that $0.01 is too low, it'd be well worth spending to advertise or propagandize. For context, USA presidential elections will spend billions, they could make ten billion posts for a fraction of their war chest.
Well, if the paper used falsified data, the authors should be punished. We can't expect all falsified data to be found, as some people are really good at falsification.
Observe HN: ChatGPT Fills in My Memory
I'm easing into my elder years. I forget some words, some celeb names. Sometimes think about it for days.

Where I might have used a search engine before, and waded through the results, I've recently been asking ChatGPT, and getting good, quick results.

Since I already "know" the answer, I'm immediately confident in the response.

I just hope I don't forget how to compose a concise query.
I'm waiting for this to become mainstream: https://lwn.net/Articles/869140/

It could enable a full user space uring without the need of kernel side polling.
The nail that sticks out gets hammered down!

These people shouldn't complain when their is no creativity left in society.
> Good to have principles that propel forwards and not become entrenched by them, wouldn't you agree? That said, you will save, or at least not waste, an awful lot of time - there was already too much and now a lot more tripe out there since so-called a.i..

In this case, it's not really entrenchment, because there are viable alternatives.
TIL about MapViewOfFile3 and NtMapViewOfSectionEx, thanks! Still, the Microsoft docs say[1]:

> [in, optional] BaseAddress

> The desired base address of the view (the address is rounded down to the nearest 64k boundary).

> [...]

> [in] Offset

> The offset from the beginning of the section.

> The offset must be 64k aligned.

The peculiar part is where base address and offset must be divisible by 64K (also referred to as the “allocation granularity”) but the size only needs to be divisible by the page size. Maybe you’re right and the docs are wrong?..

[1] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/memoryap...
> And how do you even guarantee this, 'accurate' and 'unbiased'? Any form of peer review will always have a slant, no matter how 'objective' it is intended to be.

Peer review of peer review. Instead of a couple of scientists looking at it, the peer-review process should be entirely open. So other people can scrutinize it.
The honest truth is that the Britain of today isn’t a colonial power anymore, and is rather poor by its relative standards of the past. I feel it’s more concerned with selling its past to tourists for money more than preserving it of late.
What was wrong with a <table> inside a <div style="max-height: ...; overflow: scroll">?
RIP German industrial production without North Stream and Russian cheap energy...
Sorry I had misread your line - somehow the “not” didn’t register. Can’t remove/edit my previous comment for some reason.
Dramatically increasing the amount of scientific research grant funding nationwide would be a natural response to this part of the demographic transition and to the idea of promoting college education, but instead we have an academic pyramid scheme that drives huge amounts of raw researcher labor off a cliff and into Starbucks.
> Germany could have [..] [which] shows Germany could have [..] Thus, Germany should have [..]

Germany could have skipped the industrial revolution, so they should have reached their targets already.
Yes, in the UK all mobile numbers start with "07". Landlines start with a geographical area code - e.g. London numbers start with "020".
X is under juridiction of a country intimately tied to genocide. No moral high ground in any "intimate ties" to any government involved.
This is such an all-or-nothing thought. We can aim for "better", or even just "good enough", without aiming for absolute perfection or mediocrity, and things will still keep getting better.

His point is excessively perfectionistic at best, to the point of detriment, and at worst... well, it's pedantic.
Honestly, this is just kind of shallow conversation if you don’t engage honestly with it.

Both US and UK societies have the general concept of freedom on speech - you are free to say what you want for the most part, subject to some specific limits on that right where the speech infringes on someone else’s rights.

These rights are codified, came about, and are implemented slightly differently - but in practice the difference you’re identifying is really more about what the respective societies define as acceptable.

In recent cases, the people who’ve been jailed have been done so for (among other things) incitement to racial hatred - things like public posts encouraging people to commit specific acts. The UK considers this outside the bounds of acceptable free speech.

The US maybe considers this boundary elsewhere, but it is clear that some forms of expression can constitute harassment or other criminality even in the US.

The interesting discussion is the bit in the middle - how do we build a messy consensus that deals with our differences and protects as many people’s rights to live peacefully as possible, while still allowing others to speak freely and without fear. A discussion from the starting point of “I can say whatever I want” when it is demonstrably not true doesn’t really engage with that.

The US is indeed a wonderful and amazing place full of incredible people. It would be even more wonderful and amazing with occasional bouts of self-reflection.
Max and Mojo Licensing [video]
Kangxi Chinese vases: Recovery from disaster
If you don’t know, make sure the light blinks when you drop each AirPod in. That will show it hit the contacts correctly. My APP 1s also had this issue way more often than my second gens.
China has an operational pebble bed reactor while Germany is falling behind:

https://www.ans.org/news/article-6241/china-pebblebed-reacto...

If there isn't another "Energiewende" (two 180° turns would finally amount to Baerbock's 360° turn gaffe), or alternatively friendlier relations with various resource rich countries, Germany's future is bleak.
Accessibility will rely on correct use of landmarks [1] and aria attributes, as well as real links (like the article mentions). Custom elements can do that just fine, by either decorating them with aria attributes manually and placing them in or around landmark elements, or by having the JS side of the custom element take care of that automatically. The JS class can generate any necessary markup inside of the element to help make it accessible, just like a component built with a JS framework would, and by using shadow dom and slots this markup can wrap around the child elements (though I think it's best to try to avoid shadow dom, as it is quite a cumbersome API to deal with). UX is a bit of a similar story, any kind of UX can be achieved once you register a JS class for the custom element.

[1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/blog/aria-accessibility-...
https://docs.python.org/3/

Start with offical docs.
That plot goes quite a bit further.
We won't settle this debate (and I'm not against nuclear), but it's a discussion around "Do I need fire insurance when my house has a low chance to burn down" and should I use the money for something else.

If it doesn't burn down, you look great. If it burns down, you look like an idiot.

I think people will not understand (some|most) Germans if you haven't lived through Chernobyl and Pershing-II days, dying forrests (from East European coal plants) and also red terrorism (mid 70s, early 80s were a crazy time). The discussion is not a rational one but one out of trauma of that time.
Looks like it's time for me to plug my fediverser [0] project. It can help people migrate away from Reddit by letting people sign up to a Lemmy instance [1] with their Reddit credentials and automatically subscribe them to the corresponding Lemmy alternative. The alternatives are crowdsourced. There is a "flagship" deployment at https://fediverser.network but if you want to fork it, you just need to run your instance and manage it as you see fit.

The project got a (small) grant from NLNet a couple of months ago for me to work on having the functionality built-in into the Voyager client (a PWA Apollo clone). If more people or companies would like to help/support, hit me up.

[0] https://fediverser.io

[1] https://portal.alien.top
I've forgotten a lot of the errors so don't quote me on this, but I think the table header scrolls out of screen
If you're interested in learning about this stuff, I recently made a website about it: https://plainvanillaweb.com/
I've always wondered how big of a part Soviet Union / Russia psych ops played in stirring this completely irrational anti-nuclear mentality. The side-effect of getting Germany hooked on Russian gas was extremely convenient to them.

Of course the Chernobyl disaster played some part, but it didn't result in such irrationality in most other surrounding countries. Perhaps the anti-war mentality and guilt from the horrors of WW2 also plays a part?

In any case, what a disaster German energy policies have been for whole Europe.
"Cheap" is a relative term. I'm sure lots of HN-reading US-based software engineers make enough money that $160 isn't a big deal.
> you get all comments as json

AFAIK, you don't actually get all comments, and it's impossible to enumerate all comments to a post via that method. Give it a try to enumerate based on the data that gets returned, and you'll end up with a way smaller number than the reddit UI shows on the website.
Gas and energy prices are back to normal
I’m pretty sure women won’t use crypto because they’re “too smart for that shit.”

You can’t trick black people into believing BLKCOIN will defund the police whenever you use it or convince women that some coin will empower girls in Africa whenever Aella shakes her ass.
Which is to say, the job of programming is safe,
for now.
I always supported nuclear power. It's just the best we have right now. Renewable power is all good and all, but technology is not there yet. Plus, many people in support of green energy never think about all the mining done for this and how it impacts and often destroys environments. It's OK when it's not your environment being hurt. :-)

Anyways, nuclear power is safer than people think. And most, if not all, nuclear power disasters were due to human error.
Scientists Build a Simple Gel 'Brain' That Learns How to Play Pong Better
It doesn’t matter what the logic and the math says if fear is your primary motivator.

I used to think the Germans were especially sensitive to these types of fear, but then brexit and worldwide trends towards populism as a whole reminded me this is just baseline human behavior.

It didn’t help that someone figured out pretty good branding[0] against nuclear power that makes people feel happy to resist. I would see these silly “Atomkraft? Nein, danke!” stickers everywhere. You almost felt obligated to go along with the sentiment.

0: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smiling_Sun
What kind of reform?
Postcode data is already freely available. You can even get coordinates of where the properties are. What is lacking is the actual addresses within a postcode.
Less emissions but more waste.

Germany still hasn't a Nuclear waste repository. The time plan shifted now to somewhere after 2070.

And all this doesn't possible terror attacks and sabotage into account.

Can't remember any fears about rockets hitting Ukrainian wind turbines.
I question how valuable the ontology is even once you come up with it.

It seems to me if the idea behind all this was that valuable, it would have transformed banking in the 2000s and all banks would currently run on Palantir products.

Like the graph for songs in the example, Palantir always seems like some some kind of technological theatrical performance to convince non-tech people that it is more than it really is.
you'd use val.town as hosting, and pay them for the privilege. Which seeemsu like a pretty decent business model.
Germany is stationing nuclear capable missiles again, with the approval of the Green Party, which had been at the forefront of the anti Pershing-II protests but is now a war party:

https://www.dw.com/en/germany-shrugs-off-putin-comments-on-u...

If that is possible, why not pebble bed reactors?
And who destroyed it? Either USA or Ukraine or both together. Best friends ever..
Do you suggest then that HN show every page of every comment on a separate screen?

Rigid dogma does not make for good UI.
The problem with self dealing is they need to pay taxes at registration. So while sure you can inflate the numbers it isn’t just an on paper thing this is treated as a sale and there’s real consequences of that.

As to shifting the quarter something is sold, people aren’t getting a car before registration here. Selling of excess inventory at a discount is still actual sales.
> What about the vitriol in the general public

People seems to like X. The far-left tries to make it looks like X is far-right but the truth is: anyone can use X, even the far left (and oh boy do they use it) and censorship there is now highly uncommon. Many accounts wrongfully closed have been reinstated.

Wasn't there numbers posted recently showing that X now has more active users than it used to?

It may or may not be profitable as a company, but the public certainly seems to still be using X.
> Renewable power is all good and all, but technology is not there yet.

Actually it is and here is the best summary explaining why I know of:

https://www.volts.wtf/p/what-the-sun-isnt-always-shining
The biases you have are different than mine or rather, I'm aware of most of my bias and can account for them - I have many, many predispositions, assumptions, inferences, unknown incorrect conclusions, etc.

I love your example bc it highlights the bias of science of for me. We know that quantum equations can't be looked at - I'd say that's near trivia level "known" at this point. What it actually means functionality is obviously more complicated but simply stated - reality is aware of our observation of it and reacts, at least at a quantum level.

Scientific bias is so great that they can literally work with a system that must account for that rather incredible fact, while ignoring it bc they can't explain it.

The placebo effect, NYT crossword experiments, the Stanford University 60some% threshold for an idea to be adopted/accepted by all of a society as a known/true belief - those 3 facts reshape our understanding of the world if they are actually facts. All three are undeniable facts that have simply never been acknowledged or examined further.

Further bias is displayed with the insistence that all things spontaneously came into existence from nothing, despite nothing coming from nothing for no reason - that's impossible, as no example within reality exists I can't just take that at face value, but it's the accepted "theory" - despite common sense stuff like, say a future corporation created this universe - or an inexplicable being even, BOTH trillions of times more likely to be the origin of the universe than nothing exploding for no reason.

I could write a book about the incredible biases that allow some of the smartest people to actually talk about the multiverse is a serious sense - the universe is not infinite, so a new universe can't come into existence for every possibility, that would be an incredibly stupid waste of resources - with any thought at all the commonly understood definition of the multiverse fall completely apart. It may be the dumbest thing we believe rn frfr

This is all without discussing the ACTUAL bias in science that comes from who funds stuff and etc...

So much bias in science
Sabotage Confirmed at Norwegian Air Base