skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Are you serious?

YOU are the one explaining what other have in their mind. I just tell you "maybe it's not so simple".

And you get all virtue signaling, explaining that everyone who dares not agreeing with you can only be a bad guy because you have a disabled get-out-of-jail-for-free card.

And that is not a "pseudoanalitical" explanation, that's sooo simple, if you don't get it, it's your problem. That's very easy: I don't call "artificial intelligence" an algorithm that is just a bunch of if-conditions, just because it's misleading. Others use "different abled" FOR THE SAME REASON. The fact that it does not affect you is irrelevant, you are not the reason they prefer to use a term they think (correctly or not, who cares) is better suited, and they don't do it to look good. It's very simple.
Idk if "hallucination-based API design" specifically is The Way.

There might be other ways of achieving the same goal. Also,LLM hallucination is changing/improving quite rapidly.

That said, "Designed for LLM" is probably a very productive pursuit. Puts you in the right place to understand the problems of the day.
You are aware that the Hue ecosystem predates Matter, and Google Home for that matter, and probably HomeKit, by at least a decade, right? And that all recent (at least 5 years) bulbs don't require a bridge, right?
It is not about avoiding calls but avoiding calls without context.
Reading your priorities, Fedora Workstation could be a good pick for you next time you get momentum. Complement the distro packages with flatpak, podman (docker replacement), and/or nix according to preference.

(No idea about face-id tho)
I assume you read all of the code yourself, and wrote a 1st stage compiler by hand?
It's mentioned in the post, but it never hurts to repeat it here:
https://nohello.net

It's been some years since I saw this site and ever since I always add context in all my on-line interactions with co-workers.
And then in 1737 Euler (another name starting with Eu, definitely a good name) showed that the constant e is irrational.

His proof exploited the fact that the continued fraction representation of any rational number terminates. The CF representation for e does not.
Advanced communications applications in the modern space sector
In the end for both the professionals and the amateurs, the key is the time invested in learning and the practical experience accumulated. If you did lots of wiring and properly learned for it, are you even a DIY anymore? Getting your license would probably be a formality by now. So I think the difference should be made between competent people with or without license, and gung-ho DIY who'd start everything by themselves with a philips driver and a 5 minute YouTube video. And I don't think anybody here advocates for the latter.
Show HN: Cloudfunder – Build a Crowdfunding Platform (Preview)
I just launched an early preview of Cloudfunder - a crowdfunding platform builder I’ve been working on that lets you build your own crowdfunding platforms on top of Stripe Connect.

You can try out the preview demo here: https://cloudfunder.io

There are a few screenshots on product hunt here: https://www.producthunt.com/posts/cloudfunder-preview

Features: Stripe test payments, Platform branding, Platform fees, Creator accounts, Backer accounts, Campaign pages, Campaign images, Campaign details editor, Explore campaigns, Campaign search, Campaign pledges, Campaign goals.

Coming Soon: Stripe live payments, Platform custom domains, Platform category pages, Platform custom pages, Backer profile pages, Fixed (all-or-nothing) campaigns, Campaign rewards.

Let me know your thoughts!

- Rakis
it's a practical argument as soon as someone else has to use it
> The worst is when a request starts out simple — I help them fix one hallucination — but then that customer wants to build more complex logic, and somehow I’ve set the expectation that I will provide unlimited free support forever. I’ve gotten a number of angry messages from customers who essentially want me to build their whole app for free.

Welcome to the life of any consultant/support agent/open source maintainer ever. AI isn't the problem here, managing expectations is.
Excellent; we're getting to the bottom of something here:

> Number 23, On the Nothingness of a Fart, was presumably to be shelved near Book 10 dealing with an important area of biblical scholarship, “Concerning the method of emptying the dung from Noah’s Ark”.

(that ought to be easy: dumped overboard?)

Unfortunately Donne lived 900 years after Li Bai; I fear for a proper parallel we'd need recent enshittificiations of either latin or irish: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8th_century_in_poetry#Poets ? We could skip back all the way to Ovid, of whom I'm sure 19th century schoolboys have provided some reworkings, but the effect is somewhat marred because he enjoyed parodying himself. Naso magister erat

EDIT: wait a moment: a latin poet who writes about his lover's "dead parrot" (Amores II.6)? Did the Pythons sneak some education into their sketches?
Portable Distributed Objects in NeXTSTEP.

Send a message to an object that is actually proxied over the network to another server.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Distributed_Objects
Many organic liquids/solvents are cancer juice, I wonder if this is too.
Oh! I was the one misunderstanding it. Didn't know there was a conjunction in there.
> Because many people who hire think more vetting reduces the chance of bad hiring.

I don't know why you are answering for bluGill, and bluGill is answering for you. This is frustrating to me, because you don't appear to be of one mind. Unless you are secretly of one mind, one person behind two HN accounts.

In any case, bluGill's previous comment suggests that job interview vetting is rarely enough: "I've seen very few people obviously incompetent. As such it takes a while to prove they are incompetent. They do write working code and get it through review. Often the only clear sign is nobody likes working with them - only after you get rid of them do you have concrete evidence that they weren't contributing (that is the team got as much done now since they no longer were stopping their own work to help the incompetent person on things that it is never clear if should have been figured out alone)"
Let Small Fires Burn
This is a known issue from like the 2000s where there were so many bad PHP tutorials, a lot of SQL injection and XSS etc came from those.
dns more or less was infrastructure for the last 30 years. nobody cared.

the fact that for-profit shops wanted a piece of the intelligence within made it surface and now the webheads are shitting on it like there is no tomorrow
In my experience calls rarely have a definite end. "Quick" calls often turn into 30 minutes or an hour of the colleague talking about things unrelated to the issue they wanted to discuss originally.

In the office I've had people sit at a desk next to me and just talk at me for more than an hour about themselves. Trying to politely end these kinds of conversations just results in a brief blip in their monologue before they go back to it. I've even had to get up and walk away after someone wouldn't stop talking at me.

For whatever reason there are many people who are incapable of thinking about how they're using other peoples' time. The only defense is asynchronous media like chats or emails where you aren't forced by social politeness into continuing to be disrupted.
I am looking into a non-tailwind mode too. It make sense to, as so many people don't use Tailwind, and in addition, even those who do might want to occassionally break out. Luckily I chose a name/domain name that didn't imply Tailwind only!

By the way the AI isn't because Tailwind is hard or obtuse to use. The AI is because you might need help with your design. Tailwind happens to be the output mode.
Most people won't pay for content, no matter how good it is.

Especially for text content.

People still download or stream movies and TV series even though there are multiple high quality and official streaming platforms.
> preparing the data to be "eaten" by SIMD instructions is not trivial

I've always found my best experiences with SIMD to be one level removed from the actual scary bits. I.e., using primitives from libraries which are inherently optimized.

My favorite SIMD abstraction right now is Vector<T> in .NET:

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.numerics...

If you're worried you'd get that one wrong too, you can go up another level of abstraction and use something like Matrix4x4 and its members which are also optimized.
I certainly am not making any comments about her experiences for sure! Academia is difficult and full of terrible stories, and its not surprising that it causes many people to become exceedingly bitter and contrarian (Peter Woit is famously of the same ilk as another string theorist critic who fell out of academia like Sabine).

Unfortunately a chip (even a legitimately earned one) on ones shoulder about the bad parts of academia doesn't save you from being criticized for being crank-y.
The Latex to Quarkdown comparison in the github README[0] is a much better introduction than the slide show.

Or, maybe I'm just an old and ornery programmer who frequently says in his head "GET TO THE POINT!"

[0]: https://github.com/iamgio/quarkdown?tab=readme-ov-file#compa...
Seems like it failed at the 2nd instruction I gave it:

> make me a nice round button

Success! Ok, let's try something very basic.

> it needs to have two parts, image on left side and text on right side

Then I got a system error
My favorite impact that I've had on my organization was the "no agenda, no meeting". It became a meme, minutes before the agenda-less meeting was supposed to take place someone would send it to a meeting chat or email, usually followed with ":)", especially if I were one of the attendees. In the rare cases I forgot to follow my own stubborn rule then it was a whole show, in hindsight, probably should've broken it at least once a quarter along with some penance to really help cement it.

However, I managed to "bully" everyone into following this simple rule because I had some influence in the organization; I was a manager of a large department.
Unfortunately, interns will probably get an eye-roll for such suggestions, even if they reference their superior's rule.

My point is, don't send you colleagues this link, you will come off as rude. You'll get further by e.g. feigning surprise to the lack of agenda, and maybe you get to use that opportunity to spark a conversation about the importance of an agenda. If you're a manager and above, then by all means, use your influence to force it, it will make everyone's job easier in the long run.

Oh, as for the messages that contain only "hello", just ignore them, they will either solve their own problem or quickly jump to the point once they tire of waiting for your equally pointless response. Or just have a chat with your colleagues every once in a while, maybe they genuinely care about you and your cat.
lose**, not loose, I really don't get why so many people can't learn a few basic English gotchas.
Pray tell, why can't you do this discussion async in writing?
Well, the final switch can't really happen until you release "Ctrl", otherwise the feature would be broken... and it has to be indicated somehow that the switching mode is active...

But would still like to switch between 20 or more or more most recent tabs, not just 7.
> My impression has been that the people who want a quick 1-on-1 call just don't like typing.

Yes, similar to my ex (can't get rid of her completely, shared custody of the kids) who always insist on sending voice messages. She just don't want to type and keep sending voice message after I told her several times I hated that because it made looking for past information super difficult.

By the way, wasn't there a slack like app that was working kind of a walkie-talkie kind of system within a team?
I recently switched from Pi-Hole to AdGuard Home, it was pretty straightforward to migrate my configuration and so far it's working great. I've actually got two servers running AGH + unbound (authoritative) so my internet keeps working if one setup breaks/reboots.
China's top Office clone copies Microsoft again – with an inconvenient outage
This means that people without means will automatically be excluded from the internet.

Also most people don't want to pay for content.

This just means that 99.99% of the web will instantly disappear.
Works fine for me, and I'm not a bot (I think).
This particular blog post is probably too snarky to share with most people, but I've had success with gently explaining the same concept to various clients and coworkers, especially ones who are working different with different schedules or time zones.

The trick is to frame their behavior as inconvieniencing them rather than you. In other words, if they send you all the details up front, then you can send them a good answer as soon as possible rather than needing them to drop what they're doing later on to send you a follow-up reply when you ask for clarification.

I've also found that, for people who seem to prefer talking to typing, asking them to record a short Loom video of the issue usually gets them to explain the problem with enough details to solve it.
Using Webmentions with GitHub Actions
Agenda, expected outcomes.

Everyone should know going in what is being discussed and what the expectations are around the objective of the meeting.

If you don't have these, you have no idea if it will be a productive meeting.

And don't forget https://paulgraham.com/makersschedule.html
This the classic hypocrisy of the chicken and egg issue of the "PC market".

You need already a significant "PC market share" to get video games, but you will never get that "PC market share" because you don't have video games.

But in the first place, you will really not get that "PC market share" because people uses what is installed by default on the PC they buy. So you will need mass default installation of elf/linux on PC first of all. Everything else is pointless for "PC market share", only hardcore (omega hardcore) regulation can do anything here.

Regulation for video games: forced support of a set of as simple as possible exe file format and OS interfaces, very stable in time, namely not msft ones which are disgusting and grotesquely complex and massive (but msft would be forced to support them). And if regulation happens, it will happen most likely for other more important things than video games (for instance, critical online services of administrations or utilities).

In the end, we are reasonably left only with the good will of game devs.

And I think proton is not helping here, to say the least.
I wonder what the click through rate was; perhaps it would have in fact been a good lesson.
How does tgup compare to ninite? The latter seems more polished and older/stable, with more software available.

https://ninite.com/
I've seen similar reactions and I can't help but think she's intentionally communicating provocatively to make people engage their brains.

You shouldn't just "take her seriously", you should take what she says *critically*. Hear the information and opinions, then decide for yourself whether to accept them.
"It's not stealing, I'm just freely accessing your paid content"

- users
> Instead, researchers say humans may have braced the butt of their pointed spears against the ground and angled the weapon upward in a way that would impale a charging animal. The force would have driven the spear deeper into the predator's body, unleashing a more damaging blow than even the strongest prehistoric hunters would have been capable of on their own.

I used to think humans were badass for hunting mammoths with throwing spears. But this is just a whole next level. Apparently hunting mammoths involved:

1. Getting a mammoth to charge you full speed

2. Standing your ground

3. At the right moment planting your spear in the ground

4. Holding the spear at the right angle as tons of angry mammoth crashes into it

5. Moving out of the way so you don’t get crushed by the dying mammoth.

Completely badass!
Care to explain what you mean with "mandatory" and "impossible"? I just bought a new car after test driving a few, all hybrids so no vintage, and in NONE of them it was mandatory on, and also could be enabled and disabled at will - I tried that feature too.
Some of them, for sure. All of them? I don't buy it. Show your evidence.

Also ... how confident are you that there isn't just as much benefit-from-collateral-damage among people who thrive on certainty and stability? E.g., you might have noticed that The Rent Is Too Damn High, and that governments don't tend to pursue policies that would change that, and that plausibly one important reason is that they need the votes of property-owners who see their property as a stable, reliable source of income. That's not, on the whole, a risk-seeking group, but there's a good argument that they're making money off immiserating all the non-property-owners, which is "thriving on collateral damage" if anything is.

(Which is not to say that all property-owners, or all landlords, are bad people or anything. Nor are all tech investors, or all professional poker players. That's rather my point.)
Very interesting. If people keeps creating their own extensions of Markdown it's because there's a need somewhere for a comprehensive markup language. Markdown wasn't invented with documentation in mind, for example, so now we have rST, Asciidoc, Markdoc, Djot, etc. I really wish a powerful standard emerged, though.
I can guarantee that all these users are following some "hustle university" course peddled by a Twitter influencer. Crypto and AI are the two favorite words of all these get rich quick scams.
I wouldn't consider that an alternative to a solar radio watch.
not working ... got desperate. Sign up no working ... :(
OTOH the script is 2 lines long and perfectly readable/understandable.
i guess we are both right.

thx for the clarification
Thanks - taking a look. May have hit rate limits...
Exactly. I will make explain more how PS4 emulator can be achieve.
First, you can make the whole universe. You need a universe for PS4 to live in.
Then, you make do PS4 emulator.
Now you have achieve.
> a gpu can provide 1000%+ of perf AND a certain level of portability.

Relying GPU only makes sense in a handful of context, e.g. “computing stuff fast is my core task” or “this will be deployed on beefy workstations”. SIMD addresses all the remaining cases and will give benefits to virtually everyone using your software; I'm sure one could implement a GPU-based JSON parsing library that would blow json-simd out of the water, but I'm not going to deploy GTX1060 on my cloud machines to enjoy it.
The thing is, nobody wants to be crippled (sorry, disabled): as the saying goes, it's better to be rich and healthy than poor and sick, you know. Similarly, nobody wants to be stupid. Or unable to navigate social interactions in the current socially acceptable way. While one can adopt to being any of those things, it's additional (sometime herculean) effort which only brings you back to the baseline. And things people don't like to be, they don't like to be called/implied that they are either: so e.g. every time there is a new euphemism for stupidity or mental disability, it inevitably, as it becomes wider known, starts being used as an insult.

Which is the root problem IMHO: people often insult each others, fully intentionally. Remove that human trait, and the need for euphemisms will evaporate. But that'll never happen, of course.
The Korean publishers are sensationally bad at reaching external audiences. They have themselves to blame for leaving a vast market opportunity practically untapped. My experience of the Naver and similar apps is that their tardy, mediocre, abandoned, or outright nonexistent official translations are eclipsed by the timely and often very good fan/pirate scanlations, the readers they provide range from janky to abysmal, their content delivery is globally unreliable, discovery is a joke, and licensing a digital asset in the original Korean is almost impossible for the average international user due to insularity of their commerce and delivery systems.

Several times I’ve licensed content via the Naver app, in order to support the manhwaga, but then read it via a scanlation service because the user experience and translation is so much better. The pirates often have better recommendations, too.

When customers have no channel available for purchase whatsoever, or the channel is painfully sub-standard, or creates insurmountable barriers, it’s hardly surprising that enterprising buccaneers fill the gap.

A classic case of “piracy is a service problem”, and throwing the DMCA around isn’t going to make them any more money.
> Sorry for the uninformed question

Don't be! It's good to think about security :-).

But keep in mind that "the most aggressive attacker" is a bit of a poor threat model. It sounds like a shortcut for not having to think about it, and therefore it misses the point.

For instance:

- Could it be the case that someone points a gun to your head and asks you to give access to your OS? Probably not => that's a first step in defining your threat model, where you can assume that nobody will force you to give up your password.

- Will someone have physical access to your computer? If you have a laptop that you carry around, it may get lost/stolen and therefore you probably want encryption at rest (i.e. full disk encryption). Even if it is your desktop computer at home, one could imagine that it gets stolen. If it is a desktop computer at work, then employees may have access to it. If not encrypted, they could just read what's on the disk. Or they could plug a keylogger and read everything that you type on your keyboard, etc.

- Will your OS be exposed to the Internet? Will it expose ports or can it be completely hidden behind a firewall?

- Are you the only user, or is it possible that another user gets phished?

- etc.

Those are all questions (but it is not an exhaustive list) you need to ask to decide what is an acceptable security model. If all you do is browse the web, maybe you don't need QubesOS (because you don't have anything to compartmentalize). If you sometimes need to write an email anonymously, again maybe you don't need QubesOS but you could go with TailsOS. Depending on the threat model, maybe you will want a brand new computer just for the "sensitive" activity you have, and maybe you will only connect to the Internet from "outside" (i.e. not your personal WiFi). Etc.
Starbucks new boss under fire for 1k-mile commute
I’ve heard good things about popos, will ditch my windows partition and give it a try!
The Casio LCW-M100TSE-1AER is a solid choice!
With Everything (sorted by time is live ) 1.4 or in Far Manager. v1.5 Alpha is kind of using more of properties even if I don't want (?). edit: or a column in Explorer.
Is there anything in this article series that's not in Linkers And Loaders?
The “hey Joe” catalyst types often expect a “I got that X for you” response.

They correctly assume you don’t need a public reminder for your responsibilities so they opt for a subtle nudge.
On a free forum ran by an actual VC even, not just powered by the money...
Oh yeah, I am of course using my disability to win an argument. Its not possible that I might have much deeper insight into daily communication between disabled and non-disabled people, no. I am just a frustrated blind guy trying to win an argument. As said, it is totally useless to continue this discussion with you. You are not willing to see.
I notice I often breathe deeply after a telecon. As if I was holding my breath during it. Even if the telecon was quite laid back. It doesn't happen in water cooler talks. Have there been studies about what causes this, or even how to alleviate?
But the chilling effect it has on cross-team interactions leads to the same result.
You can select the glibc ABI but game devs won't need to do it since most of them use already made game engines, and major game engines are already native elf/linux/vulkan3D ready (unity, UE5, etc) and supposed to do that job.