skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Informational vulnerabilities are often nothing to worry about, until they are.
You might want to further check with your Natenberg, maybe GP could have left out the “damage” in “collateral damage”, and strengthened “uncertainty” to “volatility”… but that wouldn’t be so poetic ;)
> How do you think that the video content is going to be stored and served if not through paid infrastructure?

Secondary doesn't mean nonexistent, it comes after the primary thing, content creation.

When the Internet was younger, people willingly paid for privilege of sharing content. Creation was the primary motivation; costs were a secondary concern. I think it resulted in more and better communities than today, where people pull out all the stops to rake in the dough as the primary means of earning money.
Social behaviors are complicated. Yes of course, it's possible to have both pleasantries (hi, how are you, etc) and ask the question in very polite ways (whenever you're free, if I'm not disturbing you, I wanted to check with you about <xyz>).

But social behaviors are habitual. I spent time in many parts of Africa where it's just downright rude/unacceptable to go to someone and ask something, even if it's just a change for a few bucks. You have to go through the pleasantries and WAIT for them to acknowledge before you ask what you want.

It's impossible to change that habit, no matter the tool, medium, rationale, process, even urgency. They're still going to say "can I talk to you for a sec" and wait for an answer. I've had people do this in the middle of production issues and it's driven me crazy. Even when things are burning, their way of escalating is still only to say "I NEED to talk to you right now", they're simply not tuned to state what they want.

To not help with this, I also went through trainings on personality traits and communication styles. Some people reveal and then explain (direct communication style), and some people first explain then reveal (indirect style), they need you to go through the thought process first before concluding. I learned that it's guaranteed to create conflicts when the communication style for a person is reversed. If you give a conclusion-first to someone who needs explanation-first, they're tuned to mentally reject the conclusion – no matter how you sugar coat it or your intention or rationale.

So we have to constantly keep reinforcing what we're ok with. Just keep calm and reinforce, tell people to provide context in your chat profile, use an auto reply, copy paste a message saying "next time please feel free to ask the question..." and so on. It's kind of a never ending battle. The only thing is, please don't assume anyone is being a jerk, the same way you are not being a jerk by ignoring that message or replying tersely.
They mention they did in the article...
They are usually terrible, with just enough sciencey-sounding content to hook non-specialists with buzzwords, and way too much unwarranted sensationalism. How many times was Einstein proven wrong this week?

They emphasise factoids with a very shallow context. Their focus on things that were proven or disproven completely hides the actual scientific work and the whole scientific method. Their headlines are most of the time garbage.

I have the same feeling about that website as I have about the Big Bang Theory: it’s too truthy not to be dangerous, and at the same time utterly wrong in all aspects that matter. Both prey on their audiences’ Dunning-Kruger tendencies.
Watches remain popular for their practicality, style, and status
PG put this perhaps more gently in his essay Maker's Schedule, Manager's Schedule.

I work with people whose days are a sequence of meetings and chats within meetings. They don't understand (or respect) that I have meetings but also must concentrate for periods of time.

https://paulgraham.com/makersschedule.html
I was confused by your post until I realized you meant "isn't" at the end.
And somehow, it’s still less toxic than stackoverflow.
There are no metaphors when dealing with the fundimentals of the universe. Metaphor is a means of teaching (ie light is a wave) but once you understand then you realize that no metaphor can ever be accurate enough. Errors occur when people see similarities between metaphors which have no meaning in the real world.
I just don't want to baby it. My uncle has a Rolex, he wears it only on special occasions and sends it in for service every few years. Which is fine, he loves his watch, it's a point of pride for him to treat it with care, but that's not what I want from a watch. That's all. No disrespect to expensive watches, it's just not for me :-)

I want a watch that I can wear everywhere and anytime, bump against walls and stuff, and if it breaks, I don't feel bad.
The problem is all of those acts take you out of flow state. I don't want and I can't randomly brainstorm when I am deep into coding. Even if I have to go take a quick water I would try to do it as quick as possible to continue with the problem I am focused on and I couldn't pay attention to the random conversation or brainstorming at a cooler.
This has created a new niche in the watch market
Automatic Temporal Tables Schema Management with PostgreSQL
How Postgres stores oversized values – let's raise a TOAST
There are entire companies and institutions that operate exclusively or almost exclusively with Linux on the desktop.

Google, Facebook, Valve, Red Hat, the French Gendarmerie, the Munich city hall...

I contend that if they can do it, others can too.
It's disabled on Arch by default. Maybe choose an operating system that doesn't treat you like a product?
Your statement is, I think, being wilfully sloppy.

To quote the outline of the proof: "First Euclid assumed √2 was a rational number.". To quote the proof itself: "Euclid's proof starts with the assumption that √2 is equal to a rational number p/q.". In two different places, the proof explicitly states that it is showing that "√2 in ℚ" is false. It is not showing that "√2 ∉ ℚ" is not false; such a proof would begin "Suppose that it were not the case that √2 ∉ ℚ", which is obviously not how the proof starts (and for good reason, because that would be much more confusing).

By all means argue that "nobody cares about excluded middle"! You're probably right, and when I insist that "proof by contradiction" has a meaning that is correctly stated by Wikipedia and the nlab, I'm just like one of the old fogeys complaining about things like "could care less" or "irregardless"! But don't misquote arguments and say that they support your case when they don't.
> There is another possibility - you're lazy and selfish, so you don't care how your interruptions affect others because your questions need to be answered right now with minimal effort on your end. But I'm sure that's not the case.

> So, when I answer your "Quick call?" with "What's the problem?", that's really for your own good :wink face:

Please do not ever write sentences like this in a professional context where you are not friends with the recipients, it's terrible.

It sets the tone to "adult to children discussion where I think that I am smarter than you" which is the last thing you want when you try to solve on of your pain point.

One the other hand if you want me to avoid interacting with you as much as I can that would be spot on.
Given it’s Starbucks, it’s almost certain that they will be using biofuels or have a carbon offset in place.

Given that, is there a problem with using a jet in this way?
It's not a curve, it's a wall.

I've tried and failed twice. I think I irreparably messed up my macOS installation with tons of crap by trying.
>But Lasting Victory Against Hamas Will Require Installing New Leadership in Gaza

Lasting peace would require some changes in Israeli Regime and military doctrine.
>If you see someone performatively policing language feel free to call them out on it.

Okay. Stop policing[0] the language of others! Is that about right?

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41318158
$30 is far too expensive for a GPT-4 wrapper.

I'd much rather pay for ChatGPT, run Vite locally and prompt "You are a tailwind assistant that generates CSS..."
From what I gather, you are correct. Furthermore, as there is no actual surface to stand on the theoretical forces such a surface would exert on a body (centrifugal due to lateral acceleration, and also normal) cannot exist anyway, so there is no physical predictive element to the idea anyway.
Big Tech's abuse of the patent system must end – I've fought Google for years
Such watches can become something like a family heirloom, passed down from generation to generation
I'd say that's how you're supposed to wear a watch, even a luxury watch. Babying it defeats the point completely. I wear my Rolex or Omega every day :). Scratches add character and history! I'll be giving my watches to my kids when I die, scratches and all.
Maybe "flow state" is not the most important thing?
Sometimes people just go for path of least resistance. Hosted APIs are convenient

I don’t think it follows that people are afraid of complexity or have been brainwashed (?!?)
Wine's Vkd3d translator is still used for DX12. DXVK does not support DX12. I believe WineD3D has gotten better, but it is also based around OpenGL rather than Vulkan like DXVK and Vkd3d are.

I was playing around with a Snapdragon 845 handheld running Linux like 2 years ago, and running older games like DMC4 using WineD3D fine. Using an additional translation layer of box86 to run x86 proton on ARM.
<Tinfoil hat> I think there's more than meets the eye here. I think part of the reason MS is enforcing TPM2.0 and now this SBAT update is that there is widespread rootkit level malware and they are trying to stay ahead of the curve. </Tinfoil hat>

When it comes to the realities of dual-booting, I had tons of problems with Win7/8/10 with suspend-to-hiberfile.sys issues and updates 10 years ago breaking grub. 10 years ago I finally decided, "You know what, I'm just going to run Linux, if I really need Windows or Mac, I can run a VM or use a separate spare computer."

Since then I have successfully setup Secure Boot for my distro, learned how to tweak QEMU for performance and passthrough, got a working QEMU macOS VM (although having to update every few months to keep XCode working is a pain), and generally pretty happy with the state of affairs.
Agree, especially when no one writing code, or managing anything, has a meaningful measure of their "productivity," or how removing or changing variables might "optimize" it. People talk about optimizing their productivity as if they had a meter on their desk showing a number, but it just comes down to subjective experience and mood.

People who act like their time has so much value they can ignore and talk down to their co-workers end up with no professional contacts worth anything when they get laid off. "I had my head down coding, I didn't have time to socialize or make friends." Optimal for an hour, maybe, but a losing strategy in the long game.
But it would not be falling into "nothing". There is an accretion disc.
Really? WoW used to work just fine back in the day (~2010). Is that no longer the case?
> Choosing and provisioning the interpreter seems out of scope for pip or any other Python-specific tooling IMO.

It's in-scope for Rye and hatch.

And I agree with that choice. Choosing a python version is as integral a dependency as choosing a version of numpy.
Microsoft's COM+ was like, hold my beer. Why use a simple syntax when the compiler could quietly insert a bunch of magic and not tell you?
Perfect weapon for a Genocide. Always tout that there were Terrorists, but take out upto a 100 people. Perfect. Ofcourse the powers that be will have to allow it, And send those weapons in the first place.
Neither 1 nor 2 are obvious. They sound more like ego to me.
The YouTube size estimates represent between 10 and 15 exabytes, that's not a possible volume for Torrents.

And that is simply touching the easiest problem to solve which is the storage part. Serving the video fast with adaptive quality and having the available bandwidth close to the user is another much larger problem.
I tried to:

- Make a simple admin CRUD layout

- Add some widgets

- Add a login/logout section in the navbar

- Make it all responsive

The first three steps worked amazingly. But the final step was probably just too difficult and I got some broken-looking site.

Still nice though, good job.
To whom? For my sanity and productivity that's the most important at least.

I only enjoy working when I am in that flow state captured by the problem without having to worry about interruptions.

This is when I provide most actual value and also get most enjoyment out of work myself.

Everything that takes me out of it feels like annoying and frustrating interruptions.
And usually I have to then try to not show my frustration and act like I am happy to do small talk or whatever, so I wouldn't seem rude.
We're always building abstractions on top of abstractions, that's how your whole computer works! Like, Assembly is an abstraction over binary instructions, compiled languages are an abstraction over assembly, etc, etc.

I'm toying a bit with this tool, and I think it's incredibly useful for prototyping.
> Do you think more than half of all STEM graduate students had a similar experience as she did? Do you have actual data to support this?

Yes, her entire description about her experience (safe for that weirdness with the textbook sweatshop) is relatable. I am not sure what you are looking for but STEM PhD attrition rates speak for themselves. Those do not include PhDs that decide to leave academia after retrieving their PhD. Not to mention the frequently discussed mental health crisis that consistently gets Nature articles.

HN's negativity is comparable to the negativity I have seen with CS, Maths, and Physics PhDs and Postdocs in personal discussions. See also PhD comics:
https://phdcomics.com/comics/archive/phd072011s.gif

If you are an idealist you will of course be worn down by the way many academic institutions are set up. There is a ton of writing on this, e.g., https://www-users.cse.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc/decline.txt
Flow state is really powerful, but it’s not constant. I don’t want to be in flow for 40 hours per week. And to tell the truth if I get a few hours of flow a week, I’m lucky.

So I don’t want to shut the door on any interactions in the unlikely chance that it interrupts me in my optimal state.

What I like to do is block off “deep work” in my calendar a few times a week. Then people can think about if they want to interrupt.

This has let me look at these “quick call” or “hi” messages as just part of being human and having a pleasant team where people are happy to interact rather than dings to maximum team productivity.
Bootstrap went away? It's one of the few stable web tools that people can and do embed in their dev products because it is so mature and well known.

I LOVE Tailwind but see a clear need still for Bootstrap.
I have one nitpick with djot that is very small but annoying: nested lists shouldn’t require a new line before them.

.

- foo
- bar
- baz

should be OK, but djot requires it to be

.

- foo
- bar

- baz

I get that djot wants blocks to be delimited by newlines, in fact I like that decision. But then a nested list shouldn’t be considered a separate block from its parent, it should be considered a “child”, where “child” blocks are delimited from “parent” blocks by indentation instead of newlines.

EDIT: formatting doesn’t seem to be working, the “foo” and “bar” are supposed to be indented at the same level.
The license is switched from (inherited from original upstream Gitea) MIT to GPL3+. Considering the nature of the software, my first thought was of course "Obviously not for the worse, but why not AGPL instead of GPL?"

Reading through the issue thread on the matter, it seems like the landing of a consensus agreement on GPL3 was after a long and ardous back-and-forth. And even if the member who originally argued for GPL over AGPL have since been enlightened and are now actually prefering AGPL, the existing decision is moving forward to at least lock that part in. There was quite some initial confusion on license "compatibility" (we need better words, this is a major source of confusion in itself) behind prefering GPL, as I read it.

A step forward, but I do hope it will be less than a few years until an AGPL Forgejo.
I've had trouble implementing this in the past. We have biweekly social calls with my team, but a lot of people don't take part! And even when they do, when we have the full team (~12 ppl), usually maybe like 3-4 people dominate the convo and it's not super satisfying.

Have you found any tricks/ideas from the implementation at your org that has made it more successful for you?
Forced is horrible. But consensual is great.
IMHO, the first step would be to learn how to use Linux (if that's not done). For that, just install some Linux distro and use it. Maybe start with Ubuntu, and try to use the command line as much as possible (instead of using the graphical user interface).

When you feel comfortable with Ubuntu, maybe try Arch Linux. You will learn a lot just by installing and configuring Arch (but you will be lost if you have no experience of Linux, hence something like Ubuntu first). Arch Linux has a very good documentation!

When you feel comfortable with Arch, try compiling packages manually. With the Arch AUR you can do that pretty easily (get a PKGBUILD and build the package). Again, that's all documented by Arch Linux!

When you feel comfortable building packages manually, maybe it's time to try Linux from Scratch: https://www.linuxfromscratch.org/. It will go one step further than the way you installed Arch Linux, and this time you will compile all the packages manually!

At this point you will have learned a lot and it will be easier to see how to move more into the kernel.

Note that this is just my opinion: maybe you can get into the Linux kernel without understanding how the Linux OSes work, but... well that's not how I would do it :-).
This is the top
Yeah, I moved the paragraphs around and pasted the quote in where it belonged, forgetting that it had been pasted at the top. Too late to edit, though.
That is, a vessel for a pressurized water reactor. A reactor operating at lower pressure (like one using molten salt as a coolant) wouldn't need such a vessel, as the salt would not become highly pressurized, even in accident conditions.

I saw a link from some government minister in Canada named Don Morgan who stated a BWRX-300 would cost $5B (CAN), which comes to about $3.6B (US). $12/W (US) is not the worst, but it isn't great. Not clear if that was all-in cost or just overnight cost.

https://www.deassociation.ca/newsfeed/4-provinces-push-ahead...
Because the count of the days for the people they encountered was derived by traveling in the other direction around the earth.
You've never been in an office and had a productive, random interaction with a coworker?

Like, never?

I've had it happen on a regular basis. I see someone and suddenly remember to tell them "oh, I did some work on that long ago, I'll share it with you" or you overhear a conversation about a topic you didn't know they were looking at?
Don’t bet on that plutonium toxicity thing. For one, most reactors aren’t going to have any plutonium (or any other radioisotope) where anyone can touch it or interact with it in any way.

Concentrated Hydroflouric acid, and even pure fluorine gas however? That can be an easy turn of a tap away at most semiconductor plants. And much worse. And if you know anything about Florine, ‘much worse’ should be pretty chilling.

I’m honestly not sure if radiation poisoning (actually quite hard and rare to die from) is worse than dying from fluorine exposure (I’m sure it’s killed a lot more people than radiation), but fluorine is certainly going to be faster.

Most fire departments are going to be a lot more concerned about a semiconductor plant than a nuclear one.
> When the Internet was younger, people willingly paid for privilege of sharing content. Creation was the primary motivation; costs were a secondary concern. I think it resulted in more and better communities than today, where people pull out all the stops to rake in the dough as the primary means of earning money.

Yes and on this young Internet your site had 100 views, mostly from people close by.

The content shared was mostly text and a small amount of images. Video and audio were largely non-existant.

> I think it resulted in more and better communities than today, where people pull out all the stops to rake in the dough as the primary means of earning money.

You're describing hobby content creators which didn't have the volume and quality of individual content creators nowadays.
Swift UI makes simple UIs easier, moderately complex UIs harder, and very complex UIs impossible. The moment your UI is more complex than a stack of stacks, the elegance and comprehensibility falls apart compared to autolayout. It starts to feel like CSS all over again, using trial and error to try out combinations of elements and properties with unclear interactions.

The pattern it enforces is theoretically great, but you will get much more mileage out of learning to write in a "reactive" style manually (When state changes, update view to match. It doesn't need to literally be a function of state to make it a function of state. E.g. don't leave ifs without elses.)

A perfect combination would be a SwiftUI-style UI editor (sans bugs) to define UI, constraints included, but traditional layout management at runtime. Well, that or a ground-up redesign of SwiftUI's API.
Sadly, just like DallE, it doesnt understand how to make 2 different ideas as 1 image.

here is my prompt:
create an FLAT technical illustration in 2 parts ( top and bottom ) with a 10px space between both, For the top illustration, show an audienceof seated adults in a theatre - all holding up their cell phones to record what is on stage. The colors used should only be 4 grey hues.

on the bottom illustration ( using the same style but in 6 pastel colors ), show the exact same crowd of adults in a theatre audience - not holding anything with all their hands resting on their sides or laps watching intently what is on the stage. for both illustrations do not show the stage, just make both camera shots 100% focused on the crowd as if the camera was pointing at them from the stage

here is the result: https://imgur.com/a/TD09ik2

DallE : https://imgur.com/a/91J2HNY
Insanely, the Chicago Convention of 1944 exempts international flights from any fuel tax. https://www.icao.int/publications/pages/doc7300.aspx

Various attempts to work round this without rewriting the convention have been discussed, e.g. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn00... but I don't think they've got anywhere.

The US _might_ be able to tax fuel on domestic flights, but that would result in the California to Seattle flight going via Canada to avoid the tax.
> widespread rootkit level malware and they are trying to stay ahead of the curve

Microsoft is within US-legislation. So a three-letter agency already has the keys and their spyware is a signed UEFI module.
You are using 32 bit floats to represent money?

Does your project correctly calculate $300,000.00 + $0.01, (or even just correctly represent the value $300,000.01) and if so, how?
If you spent even a nanosecond considering these other people, you might stumble upon the hypothesis that these people are trying to port the way they interact with others in meatspace to an IM channel, rather than assume some form of mental illness.
How is CSS like trial and error?
That's some conspiracy stuff, got proof? I mean... You're not even a real doctor, you make pizza's.
Do you feel that the free market wouldn't have adopted it at some future point in time?
It's weird that they call the mammoths "predator" when they were herbivores and we were hunting them.
It is underrated how much a productivity hit the constant changes in windows cause
"Calls are ephemeral" is a feature, not a bug. Real-time chat should be as well. Slack storing messages until the end of days is an anti-feature.