skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Anosognosia: What happens when a person is unaware of their mental disorder?
Is this related to "Roast my startup landing page" posted yesterday?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41273770
this intent/implementation duality was codified by the chevron precedent that was just overturned by the supreme court.

the legislature was responsible for establishing intent, and the executive was responsible for implementation, and the judiciary branch was responsible for resolving disputes.

but the supreme court ruled that the legislative intent has been too vague, and the executive has been too whimsical with implementation. so the legislature must be more specific, or leave it to the judiciary to establish details.
Itanium is dead. Nobody even makes an emulator for it. Just let it die already...
> you can detect stalled metrics (per host or service), who didn't send the data on time, etc

I guess the difference here is that we leverage service discovery in Prometheus for this instead of having to externally build an authoritative list of who/what should have pushed metrics.

> <...> and wait for a response.

As opposed to waiting for $thing to push metrics to you?

I guess I'm not convinced that one architecture is obviously better? There might be some downsides to a particular implementation but generally they both work and only external constraints will dictate which you use? E.g.: if you're required to ship metrics to multiple places, pushing to graphite and datadog becomes easier.

Anything that _should_ be scraped is tagged a certain way and anything that doesn't respond to a scrape gets flagged. After a few flags, an operator is paged. When $thing is destroyed or re-provisioned, different tags lead to a different set of $things to scrape metrics from.
Local morons gave ours an ipad with its own data plan, free access to youtube, and screentime disabled. I had zero control but to physically take it. Bet you can’t wait to find out what happened next!

Many months later we got a stern letter that yt had to be blocked because students weren’t using it for assignments. Who could have predicted such a thing? :-P

It all started during covid too so I had very limited ability to say no.
Algorithms we develop software by
I'm the opposite. I deliberately avoid checking my email outside of predefined times, and hate it when a website assumes that everyone is happily living in their inbox.
That is a much better way of putting it, thank you.

(edit) One thing neither of us directly mentioned in our comments, but which I feel is important is this bit from your article intro:

> Insufficient automaticity, particularly in basic skills, inflates the cognitive load of tasks, making it exceedingly difficult for students to learn

A real-world example for myself was when I was learning a small lick on guitar with an uncomfortable-to-me rhythm. I initially just played it slowly so I could get everything right, trying to speed it up every now and again to check progress. I progressed, but slowly. What ended up demolishing the challenge is the separation of the rhythm element(s) from everything else involved in the lick, and practicing those individually. By themselves they were easy to knock out (matter of minutes), and after those few minutes when I revisited the entire integrated lick I could suddenly knock it out of the park.
No need to downvote. At least France is developing a disposal site in Bure. But they will need a second site for the highly active waste of the 50+ NNPs.

EDIT: changed 80+ to 50+
If entries can be relations themselves it is not possible afaik. For example

User | Telephone Numbers
-----+------------------
A | 123, 456 <- not atomic; more than 1 number (i.e. a set)
B | 789

Now there are academic operators to convert to and from a purely relational system, but I don't think they are implemented/in the standard. I forgot what they are called, however.

In general you don't want a universal query language. Depending on the shape of the data you want different things to be easily expressible. You can, for example express queries on tree-shaped data with SQL (see xPath-Accelerator), but it is quite cumbersome and its meaning is lost to the reader. I.e.: It's fine when computer-generated, but there is too much noise for a human to read/write themselves.
I'd be glad to be proven wrong here, but as time has shown, there is no one size fits all for programming languages. The requirements for different applications just vary too much.
That's all very convenient for the police, but not at all for the individual. Real life of an individual does have hard time caps, for the duration of their expected life, for how many days they can go without food, without a livelihood, etc. When the police seizes property, they affect these things for an individual. There are time caps to each of these things for the individual.

Imagine if a prison sentence failed to define the duration of the sentence, and it was left to the prison to keep the individual for as long as the prison wants.
I mean, if I don't say it, then there's no one else to say it. It's saying no to other engineers and to product and leadership as well. Also it's not just about saying "no", but then spending energy and time on why something should not be done. If it stopped after me saying "no" it would be easy enough.

I've picked a strategy at times where I will say that something is a bad idea for the reasons X, Y and Z, and then when they still want to go on with it, I'll let them, so it would be possible to win some trust with them so I don't have to spend so much energy again on explaining why something should not be done. I will refrain from "I told you so", hoping that it allows to build some confidence to move on quicker next time.

But then at some point people rotate and I have to start building that trust all over again.

I guess with other engineers I just hate it when someone is really enthusiastic about something and I think the idea is truly impractical and will do more harm than good. I have to kind of find a way to direct them to do something else without hurting the enthusiasm.
I got paid to develop some software for a teacher at my school and wrote it in some kind of basic (GWBASIC?) for my IBM PC AT clone, then found out she had a CP/M machine.

I had just read in Byte magazine that there was a good CP/M emulator that ran several times faster than any real CP/M system already in 1988 or so. So I used that software to run a CP/M environment and port the code to some BASIC variant there.
Everyone in our life has spoken about how impressed they are by our kids' ability to have conversations. My friend group asks us what the secret is.

Secret: very limited phone and tablet time. Like how life was for millennia before smartphones.
They are big capitalistic industries that were well established in the market, and right-wing tends to think that free market is a good thing and that state should not constraint the market. Right-wing politicians tend to be more friendly with successful big industries leaders, either because they are part of their circle or because they see successful company leaders as deserving to have a bigger say in the political decisions. Right-wing tends also to be conservative, so be less in favor in socio-economical changes.
The study misses the point I think (I only glimpsed over it). But Germany invested early into renewables at a time where they were still very expensive. The goal was to create an economy of scale and bring down the price. This was expensive for Germany but ultimately very successful: renewables are now very cheap. The same thing never worked with nuclear in the past.
Part of why the Energiewende was expensive was that it provided long term financial incentives for those who invested in renewables when they weren't yet economically competitive.

If you bought solar panels 20 years ago you received subsidies for every year since then at the prices of the past.

In a way Germany bankrolled a lot of the renewable development with this. Of course it wasn't viable to continue this so German government scaled back the scheme aggressively, which unfortunately killed the solar industry in Germany almost entirely (roughly 10 years ago).

Today everything has changed. Renewables are now cheaper than fossils and thus expanding at incredible rates. There is no point in turning back to nuclear power which just got worse and worse from their economics.
Joke’s on you, I’ve never been able to maintain eye contact with anyone and I grew up long before smartphones were a thing.
There is exactly one country on earth that has found a permanent storage for its nuclear waste. For all we know Germany might still be amoung the first countries to find one.
That’s one of worst part of TiDB to be honest.
Single boundary with simple flag listing peers (or DNS SRV address) would bring you a lot of smaller companies and/or hobbyists who will contribute.

Having different parts written in different languages is awful too, because it brings some micro improvements (if any) but makes project look complex and scary for many new-comers :(
I even had a teacher in the States who referred to herself in the third person, so it had been a thing there too, but she (~1915?) was from a generation before Delon (1935).
That is false. Please don't spread misinformation. Chevron had nothing to do with how legislatures write laws.

The prevalence of extreme propaganda on this site is getting really tiresome.

It is an objective, inarguable fact that neither Chevron nor Loper had anything at all to do with the ability of Congress or state legislatures to distinguish between intent and implementation.
I think you’re overestimating HN’s influence here
Those are 2 good examples. A lot of the old terminology is very powerful because it doesn’t try to be slick/pc. Saying ‘variance’ is slick but it doesn’t convey as much as dispersion. Statisticians also speak in terms of first raw moment which has a lot of physical meaning behind it - saying ‘mean’ doesn’t convey anything. We frequently use coefficient of variation in the old texts. It tells you right away that it has something to do with variation, so you can dig into it and find you are normalizing the dispersion by the expectation so basically how much variation for a given amount of expectation. Instead of saying useless jargon like sharpe of vtsax is 0.7 on a 3 year timeframe, you could as well have said a coefficient of variation of 1.4 - that tells you right away how much dispersion you can expect in your return, whereas by saying sharpe you are simply gatekeeping and putting william sharpe on a pedestal for what is essentially a very silly ratio that statisticians have used for centuries without any fuss. I notice that in all the Indian news channels, they have translated the word monkey and the word pox, and then combined the two translations into a compound word, which right away gives much more useful information than calling it mpox because of dei reasons. So the people speaking Hindi or Tamil or any Indian language know right away what the disease refers to, whereas saying mpox gives you zero info. The next generation will simply be told mpox and think thats an actual word.
This is why I have been cautious about TypeScript. Quite often it leaves me with impression that it's a language that enables the same kind of type astronaut developer that also hurts Rust. Except in TS this truly has no benefit besides superficial perception of improved type safety.

Please, if you have powerful type system, it does not mean it warrants pushing it to its limits, and strikes me as the behavior everyone tends to suffer from in the middle of a learning process of a new tool.
I'm not sure of your definition of objective here. If you mean a specific implementation and exact version of a specific language does one objective thing that might be true.

But, different implementations of the same language and different versions of those implementations can all do different things. GC rarely says exactly when something will be collected. Only that it will eventually.

Example: https://jsfiddle.net/8cej4tpk/2/

Firefox GCs after about 8 seconds, Safari GCs immmediately, Chrome never (probably not until there's pressure). And, you'll find different behavior if you go check different versions of those browsers.
They needed to build new ones decades ago but didn’t. It’s way too late now. Young people were pushed away from the industry, and now the country doesn’t have a skilled workforce anymore and mostly only has old reactors that cost more and more money every decade to maintain.

The whole history of nuclear in Europe is incredibly sad, we stopped developing and investing after some early success, and with almost no serious consideration of future problems. And all of this has been known and discussed openly for decades.
The landing page reimplements built-in browser features (<details> / <summary>) badly in JavaScript. This looks like a home-rolled forum system designed by somebody who doesn't know HTML. In my experience, this means there are enough accessibility issues to justify binning the entire codebase and starting again from scratch.

If you had an interesting way to organise, index and/or connect the problems, or something, I might look into this further. But judging by the landing page, there's not even an existing community. There's no reason for me to participate, or invest time in trying to improve your system.

Perhaps a minor thing, by comparison: I don't have, and will not create, a Google account. (I expect that I cannot create a Google account that sticks around longer than a month.)

(I appreciate you're trying to solve a collective action problem – perhaps the collective action problem. Keep at it! The fifth or sixth time might work, if you learn from failure each time.)

Unlike other commenters, I don't think "problem" is too broad. So long as you're prepared to delegate to other projects as appropriate, there is actually room for a large-scale, overarching project like this.
Only if you approach the domain with ignorance. It's very, very clear that chargebacks are not the play in most cases.
Preparing for the v6 Release
> the demonstrated ability to turn a child quickly into an expert—in chess, music ...—sets a clear challenge before the schools. Can educators find ways to encourage students to engage in the kind of effortful study...

What's interesting is the subtle shift from saying objective ability can improve to asking if schools can encourage (motivate?) students to engage.

I'm guessing most teachers know that given the right circumstance, students can be made to improve in math/reading. But getting all/most students to engaged in the right "kind of effortful study" is just a different task.
Curious was there a problem that inspired you to create the website? Could be inspiration to scope down the website focus some, or have an example problem/solution on the front page
And then teachers would not be able to call 911 if there is an emergency in class. Next suggestion, please, this one was no good.
There’s a reason both Go and Rust eschew exceptions. They’re something that superficially seemed like a great idea but that in practice complicate things by creating two exit paths for every function. They also don’t play nice with any form of async or dynamic programming.

C++ should never have had them, but we have sane clean C++ now. It’s called Rust.
I’ve been an iPhone user since day 1 and have been happy with it. Any time I look at Android it feels like managing my phone would need to become a hobby, which I don’t want.

On the iPhone…

- The built in camera app is pretty good. If you don’t want to use Apple to store your photos, there are likely options that can upload them where you want… or plug it into a computer and copy them off like a camera.

- GPS, the usual suspects are there for maps or other GPS needs.

- Web. All browsers use WebKit on the backend (for now), but then if you have a particular browser of choice to sync bookmarks and things, it’s probably there. I did this with Firefox for a while, and it worked fine.

- RSS. NetNewsWire is open source and has been around forever. It’s what I use.

- Chat, again, it’s all there, plus iMessage, which is not available elsewhere. And RCS is coming later this year, which should make things better between iOS and Android, instead of SMS.
Why is Hungary not listed as an NSO client? The presentation is only as good as the data. Amateur vibes.
Google accounts aren’t exactly scarce commodities
It’s the senior+ SWE’s responsibility to ask those questions at the design stage. If the design was approved without those details, that is a failure by technical leadership.
It is perceptible and it is jerky.
Lots more folks use vlc I’d guess.

The media players we have on mobile don’t suffer from these issues, so they must be solvable.
The big issue with VLIW (or VLIW-adjacent) architecture for practical modern use cases is preemptive multitasking or multi tenancy. As soon as any assumptions about cache residency break, the whole thing crumbles to dust. That’s why VLIW is good for DSP, where branches are more predictable but more importantly you know exactly what inputs will be in cache already.
He’s probably just trying to source business ideas for free
>At that point you may as well implicate Apple, along with the rest of FAANG for being members of PRISM.

Of course, as they should be.

lets not go so far ahead to call Android an "open" product, as flashing a custom rom is severely limited(both flashing, and your capabilities afterwards - for example you might run into issues with banking apps) - but at least you can read the source(without any guarantees that rom contents match it)
Of course it doesn't, despite all the talk, Sweeney happily kept having his games published by Microsoft and Epic Games store released without Linux support.
Sadly only works for single user
I'm sure it could exist in theory, but VLIW for these large chips has been outcompeted by OTF reordering and SMT, which are capable of extracting almost as much work from the processor as an ideal VLIW instruction flow for a lot less effort.
It’s a funny one because it’s not like it ever really took off.
Architectures like m68k are also probably pretty dead, but there’s a ton of these chips out there in embedded or retro kit and you can probably find one to test on if you need it.
> The note from P&G on my 1992 toilet paper said Charmin Ultra had shrunk “because it is so thick we couldn't put as many sheets on and keep the rolls the same size.”

> Uh-huh.

I mean...that makes plenty of sense. My parents love this ultra-thin single-ply crap that gets plenty of footage on the roll, but it doesn't really matter when you have to pull off six feet and fold it a dozen times to get a good wipe.
> That’s why VLIW is good for DSP

Maybe GPU usage as well. I know very little about what the ISA of GPUs looks like though.
When you lie about something serious like saying that the judge in question was locked in jail or that the ex-president Bolsonaro approved a military intervention[0] while millions of people are pissed because their candidate lost an election, that's not just lying. The people telling the lies know it is not true but push it anyway. It is beyond that those people respond criminally for that.

0. https://i.em.com.br/Fpd82XCP-00L-3N2yGZxALIPPqA=/820x0/smart...
This is sad but we can find some solace in that providing demand/an initial market by this, it basically jumpstarted the mass-production of photovoltaics, leading to price decline and thereby mass-adoption of solar power in my opinion.
Microsoft has some really perverse incentive structures. Side note, their forums are insane. Most of the "help" is "just run sfc /scannow and then re-install windows" they very clearly do not care to fix actual problems or to help people. They approach problems from a very far distance using a one-sized fits all approach. I think this says a LOT about how ms operates. I do like how Unix is the polar opposite of this. Its very DIY and fix it yourself.
China is a hotbed of scamming.

The UN estimates that there are 100,000 victims of human trafficking to work at scam call centers in Myanmar alone, and many of those are Chinese nationals. https://www.dw.com/en/how-chinese-mafia-are-running-a-scam-f...

The problem is so bad and well-known that a movie was published in China’s strictly censored market and made $500M at the box office. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_More_Bets?wprov=sfti1
None that I'm aware off.
> Audio cassette tapes were the same way.

Ah the days of audio books on tape. For a moment I was thinking "renting audio tapes?" but then the memories hit me.
That's a tough pivot. So, you went from low-cost to high-touch, only to find a market that didn't scale? That's gotta sting. Did you consider a hybrid model or focusing on only one end???
To give those experts some credit, they probably had overly optimistic assumptions that European countries would take the rational smart choice of nuclear, instead of being all over the place.
can you provide a correct interpretation of the ruling?
Between teachers phones, intercoms, cameras, and hardline phones there should be plenty of communication equipment available for a crisis. If anything having a phone could put someone in jeopardy by making noise and giving away position or distracting owner. What is the scenario that it has helped? Have police coordinated response based upon students phoned in reports and telemetry?
Sorry I was feeding into his manic episode. I do see the point he’s making but it’s flawed. It’s similar to the gun debate.
Claiming that the owners will "need to shutdown the business" because there are now power lines running above it seems a bit hyperbolic.
> Note that I vaguely remember having read somewhere that EPIC isn't "true" VLIW

Well IIRC, the amount of execution units presented architecturally are not actually reflected to what is available internally. This was done to allow them to increase the number units under the hood without breaking backward compatibility (or is it forward compatibility in this case). At which point, you still are going to need scheduling hardware and all that jazz.

That said, to my limited understanding, all processors are internally VLIW, it's just hidden behind a decoder & scheduler that exposes are more limited ISA so that they don't have to make the trade-off Itanium did.

That said, I really wonder if it's an issue of compiler was too complicated to bootstrap one good enough to get the ecosystem going, or if it was a truly brainded evolutionary fork. Anyone seem any good hand optimised benchmarks to see the potential of the paradigm?

Btw, it looks like someone started adding IA64 support to QEMU:
https://github.com/amarioguy/qemu-itanium
I must not find the divide as strikining because it's not clear to me whether your comment intends to highlight rich+FAANG parents as better or worse at appropriately managing technology around their kids.
In Java you can't have a class implement both Iterator<Foo> and Iterator<Bar> (type erasure; or maybe my Java is out of date...). Anyway if you could, the for loop would not know which to use.

In Rust you could have both Iterators if it had a type parameter.
I think it is acknowledged in the energy sector that France drove itself in a dead-end (and I'm not sure how they are going to get out of it). There was a lot of reasons, including their botched electricity nationalization and the fact that electricity companies banked on short-term profit rather than longer-term stability (hoping that the state will save them and pay all their debt when it is needed).

It does not mean that a nuclear path would have always led where France is, the same way a renewable path is not always leading to where Germany is.
Nwipe: Secure Disk Eraser
I guess the difference is the Earthquake threat
That's rough. It's tough to work with someone who doesn't get it.
Schoolgirl's dinosaur footprint find on Vale of Glamorgan beach