skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
But typically, if you do spend some time to think about schema, and relationships, you only have to spend a small amount of time, and map that into the appropriate place, and then usually you don't have to mess with it again. It's worth the investment.
I really liked the openness he presented about himself. He talked to a bunch of students about things he knew, with little filter, that's it
That would mean it happened under Jair Bolsonaro
Yes, for elements. The project here also supports a notion of components, though, which E4X didn't contemplate.
The lack of default argument values initially annoyed me, but I kind of came to like it. It makes me put more thought into my function interfaces.

In the rare cases I do want a default it's usually reasonable to just add a second function that calls the first with the default value.

I don't end up doing this a lot, but I certainly have in a couple handful of cases. A lot of Go libraries for HTTP related activities do this with the default context. They'll have a function that accepts a context and a function that has the default context.

Example

https://github.com/slack-go/slack/blob/242df4614edb261e5f4f4...

Honestly, with good naming, I think this is just generally more readable and expectable behavior only takes three lines of code.
Does it still take that long? I thought that was fixed.
There are some big issues with the ML community today. One is brazen assumptions. If the subject is under study, why write your title and abstract in such a fashion that you assume that LLMs can "understand". That is the source of my original (fairly mild) objection. If the problem isn't "solved", why assume it is?
> With such a large field of vicious competition

Other than BYD (which has a strong product market fit and a very strong technical foundation in both battery tech and automotive development), where can the competition export?

Every major automotive market has preemptively or actively placed tariffs on Chinese automotive exports straight from China.

SAIC, GAG, GAC, BAIC, BYD, etc will all have to either ToT IP, open domestic factories, or create JVs in order to enter most markets.

BYD completely owns the Chinese EV market in absolute numbers - and the competitors had to preemptively begin exporting abroad, which sparked trade wars and worries of dumping, which made it harder for BYD and other players to export "Made in China" cars
My first impressions of the Onion website redesign (which they lampshade with this article) are highly positive. It's clean, unbusy, and just looks right to me. What are HN's thoughts?
Optional chaining is now in vanilla JS.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Refe...
[dupe]

Official release: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/08/...

(https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41249189)
I think that -MC is misleading. It would imply anycast (like what you would use for a work distribution queue), but the disruptor is multicast, I.e. all receivers potentially receive all the data. It is also lossy, like UDP.
Most of their functional unix machines ended up with https://icm.museum/ but there's some cool stuff in these auctions that will hopefully be put on display or managed by a group who can keep them running rather than warehoused.
It was published in a scientific journal, so yes.
I expected as much, usually it's me pointing out that mongodb is a decent DB depending on the data you're ingesting/storing, and it's builtin clustering is significant better then what postgres offers at the moment.

But the number was so low I couldn't help but point out that this was more likely to convince me that mongo is a joke then a usable database
It’s to discourage text posts.

They’d rather you posted it to Medium or your blog or something, and then post a link to that here.
I like this concept. It sort of reminds me of the vibe from the game Portal.
Interesting, is there no way for this law to change?
If they get really good at it they can use their own AIs to defend them.
This advice kind of feels like "Don't pay your taxes. Just go all in on enjoying your life and not constantly be worrying about things that aren't going to matter if you die. Worry about it later if the IRS goes after you."

You really should be preparing for the future and operating above board, even from day one.
A common bit of advice is to build one less of your widgets than what your customers will buy. You then meet demand (nearly!) and your price gets supported.

Chinese manufacturers on the other hand, seem to be following the "build it and they will buy" philosophy. When you do this, prices (and profits) head towards zero.

This is the exact opposite of the Toyota Way, where customer demand serves as a signal (Kanban) to produce a widget and deliver it when needed.
And now people argue blocking certain network elements from loading on a website is "piracy"

Its frankly disappointing how passified most internet users have gotten with regard to corporate BS in recent years
Either Firefox is not supported, or I don't understand what I'm supposed to do. Either way, I was confused.
Blanket outlawing of utilitarianism is its own slippery slope.

Just because some long dead philosophers, mostly affluent people who avoided real work and utilitarian choice, had time to sit and cobble together some syntax and semantics doesn’t mean it’s literally possible to live by their high minded babble

And to the moral point; today the majority rely on as little labor as possible paid as little as possible to make their food and clothes; consuming the few willing to work for little for the benefit of the many is daily life for richer countries. Pretending our society is beyond such because our historical philosophy says it is pretentious wank
I don't know exactly why, but I suspect it's because of the repercussions that started popping up in the news just after the release. The talk was given 1 month prior to the publication of the video, so it was already a little outdated
Because it came up recently for me (triggered a starvation bug), a caution for people expecting Go to randomize everything like this:

Blocked channel reads and writes are unblocked in FIFO order, not random. Mutexes are similar (afaict not quite identical, but the intent is the same).

Go randomizes a lot and I am thrilled they do that, and I knew about mutexes already, but the chan part was a surprise to me. It's reasonable and matches mutexes, so that's probably for the better, but still a bit oof.
Oh interested in the issues with http clients you have? I think they are great to use for being right in the standard library. Only complaint I have is defaults for timeouts and such, but you make that mistake once and don't forget.
Actually, that's a good perspective that I hadn't considered. I can appreciate that.

I can't really find much justification for hiring in the lower third of a band, but I could see what you've said, or middle third being the default, upper third.

I usually don't like the "we prefer to leave room for raises and such", because that's trite - you set the bands, you can adjust them.

(I also get - and have been burned by companies who didn't - the need for a pipeline: not every engineer can be a senior engineer, you need juniors to be able to grow and evolve and be the seniors when those people become EMs etc.)
Let us assume they start dumping all their excess internationally. Do you think other countries will just allow china to flood the international market and drive other countries respective auto makers out of business? Other countries will raise tariffs accordingly until they reach an equilibrium that they feel comfortable with.
It’s roads in tunnels with small cars/vans going mostly point to point.

It’s just a separate road system with pods driven by a person or computer.

What are the significant differences?
With enough money you can help elect someone to change the law and… whatever you did is no longer a crime.

Problem solved.
The incentive requires the chargers have 97% availability.
You don’t have to pay income taxes until you record profit, at least, so that really is like what he is saying. The IRS is not going to think this is weird, many (most even) startups never get to the point of paying taxes, and non-profits by definition don’t.
Just based on your comment, I would have asked the candidate if he/she would be available outside 9-5 hours in case of an emergency, understanding that the organization will do as much as possible to stay 9-5. I have seen several employees not caring about that detail which can harm the organization.
I'm not convinced true randomness exists. If every attribute of every particle in the universe could be known at a given time, like a snapshot, and we had unlimited resources to simulate the universe as a whole from that point in time, we could perfectly predict literally anything about the future, including the sparkles in every waveform of all of earth's oceans.

This is my understanding of what distinguishes randomness, e.g. pseudorandomness, from "true" randomness. Then again, I'm an idiot, so I would welcome any respectful attempt at helping me better understand the difference, or why true randomness might actually somehow be possible (even theoretically).
I want to probe a couple of assumptions here...

1. Isn't it possible that there are some businesses that shouldn't succeed? I could give examples.

2. What if someone doesn't 'have' to ignore the law, they choose to ignore it because they think they 'have' to?
But who is to blame? I, the one who has amount x of time and wants to reach the maximum amount of people? Or the browser vendors for just doing the bare minimum to be compatible with each other but nothing more. The browser vendors do have a lot more manpower (and money) than me…
Schmidt oversaw lots of “stealing” at Google, from Google Books (Author’s Guild), to Image Search (e.g. Perfect10 etc, before even Getty), the French press .. all before Viacom vs Youtube and others.

Schmidt was also notably part of the tech no-poach / wage suppression scheme ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech_Employee_Antitrust... ).

He knows very well the spectrum of stealing and liability. In this talk he’s pounding his chest in front of young investors and executives to celebrate what he got away with and to inflate his brand.

Contrast though with TK, who through Greyballing (among other things) wanted to “steal” the taxi market and make himself and Uber above the law.

So Schmidt’s raw ambition is no joke. But historically his actions have been perhaps more conservative than those of others.
Thanks, I agree with that input.

What are your thoughts on this from a conceptual lens?

https://github.com/space-bacon/Semiotic-Analysis-Tool
Replacing teachers with AI today.

Replacing schools with prison camps tomorrow.

What could go qrong?
Olympic medal counts, ranked every possible way in 3D
Sorry, mate. I'm really not immersed in the English-speaking world, so I don't exactly understand the use of 'crazy'. I just see this word being used and used it here. What I meant was that I think what he said was perfectly normal C-level talk, and that's it. I hope my words don't resonate badly

Really, I was just commenting something completely honest about what I thought.
If you make enough money, you just purchase laws.

No need to try and decontextualize.
The President is part of the executive branch, not the judicial branch.
You're allowed to both like the openness and criticize the character of the speaker who is being open.
Specific questions aside. I have for many years approached interviews in the mindset that, I am interviewing them, and this has worked out much better for me. Of course this is amplified by doing research and preparing specific questions to produce a more truthful image of the business and culture. However, people are generally trained to weed out "non-culture fits" and close on "unicorns", so nothing said in an interview should be taken as reality.
I'm sure ICE owners would get over it quickly when they drive away after 3 minutes and the EV is still there being fleeced for overpriced vending machine coffee.

Don't get me wrong, EVs are good, and if you can charge at home or work, take little marginal time to charge, but an easily-pumped 40MJ/l liquid is a tough mark to beat when you have to fuel at a station.
When there’s nothing left to do, one does what’s needed, especially to protect the Brazilian employees from being caught in the middle.
Fanless

Or

High end CPU/GPU

Pick one
Symbolics S-Dynamics manual (1985)
Summarizing Pirated Books into Articles with Google Geminni
The system here still ran on 80s computers as of a few years ago and has had minimal upgrades.

Your missing the point: this was a solved problem 40 years ago and Tesla has decided to reinvent what works, for less capacity, with a far more difficult problem to solve and it’s somehow better?

You called it not metro, other people in this thread are calling it a metro and it “will be better then a metro
I'll just throw in:

If you use functional options, please don't implement them with closures. Closures aren't comparable, so there's essentially no way to build middleware that varies behavior based on those arguments.

Just make a `type thearg string` or whatever instead. Very similar amounts of code, similarly hidden implementation, but MUCH more usable.
> Also copyright infringement does not physically harm people.

Starving artists might disagree here.
I'm considering running a selenium pipeline that downloads txt of everybook and then summarizing into respective articles and publishing. Suggestions?
How about slave labor? Definitely more profitable than paying employees. Is the law broken here, too?
Sure, one can make a new function. That's what I do, too, but then I end up greatly missing function overloading. In the example's case I might end up making a ReplaceAll function. It creates namespace clutter.

Function overloading could easily handle context with and without arguments.
If you think building a Stripe or Visa replacement is easy, go ahead and try.
> Based on past experience, the reputation of a system or stories about it being used by other organizations are weak data points. We will want to independently verify any properties we care about.

That's an hidden pearl of wisdom right there.
If something is clearly illegal or immoral to you don't do it. This is more about if its ambiguous or you believe your companies goal is a good thing and it's unclear if you will get sued for it.
> I 100% trust my open source audited rm, but it will definitely remove everything from my system if I call it with parameters "-rf" and "/" with sufficient permission.

You're almost there. Now imagine you could not trust it to do that, and also did not ask it to be there, and also it was an internal tool for verizon written by verizon:)

And it's not like rm, it's more like teamviewer and who knows now many bugs it has. If I install linux and there is a hidden teamviewer there, even if it doesn't run by default I would wipe the system just in case because wtf.

Ask yourself, is it by design? If yes, why? If not, then the responsible person did not notice it there, so ask yourself then what else did they miss?

It just should not be there period, if it is there something somewhere went super wrong.
DifuzCam: Replacing Camera Lens with a Mask and a Diffusion Model
That’s definitely part of it.

The other half is hyrum’s law.

There’s a lot of situations in reasonable unordered map implementations where the elements, by chance, do happen to be ordered. Just due to arbitrary implementation decisions.

But the Go spec says that maps are unordered, and library writers want to reserve the right to change the implementation in the future.

So always ransoming the dict prevents code from accidentally depending on some specific map implementation detail.
The average (successful) bank robber gets less than $5000 in exchange for a substantial risk of going to prison for 10-25 years. It does not actually pay if you think ahead enough to do the math.
Firefox is the libre alternative struggling to compete with the Google behemoth which adds things to its browser even faster than they appear in the standard. Safari is the underfunded child of a corporation as wealthy as Google. It is mainly the first that motivates web developer solidarity.
Obviously I'm not talking specifically about corporate taxes, here. In fact the example was about personal taxes. It's a generality about the attitude of "Ignore the rules, do what you have to now, and worry about the consequences later."
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=818367
> You've missed the "if you have to ignore it to succeed" part of my comment.

Breaking the law makes a lot of terrible business models instantly profitable.

Imagine I have a uranium refinement company. It is a colossal capital investment and not many companies do it. Law forbids me to sell weapons grade uranium for random people, but it just happens those very people are the ones who are willing to pay a lot of money for it as long as I don’t ask too many questions.
Yes, these numbers seem accurate. In my personal case, I could save a bit more (very roughly 20%?) in the US, but I've concluded that it wasn't worth it.

However, for higher levels (L6+), I think the difference becomes more important. Also, in US tech centers, there are many more opportunities than in Europe. If I were to lose my FAANG job, there would be no way I'd make the same amount of money in a different company in my country. On the other hand, being on a transfer visa in the US can make it hard to switch to a different company too.

In the end, there are pros and cons, and not a definite answer as to where it's best. It depends highly on individual circumstances.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I don’t see how a government elected by the people can be considered a dictatorship. This also applies to Bolsonaro’s government as well. Just because you don’t agree with the ruling party doesn’t make it a dictatorship.
> ...What?

Here's where you dismissively suggested that evaluating and storing locations that might be asked for in the future was unnecessary: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41266544

> Games without coroutines? That's almost every game ever made.

Bullet hell games? None? Honestly it took several tries for me to come up with a game that lacks an internal language and VM (e.g. StarCraft and WoW have at least 1 and at least 2 respectively). Stephen's Sausage Roll seems like a potentially winning bet only because I don't think you can make all of it in PuzzleScript, which is what the author normally uses.

> You realize most of these types of games originated in the 80s and 90s and were made in assembly right?

There weren't any of these games prior to Batsugun in 1993. According to the people who have reverse engineered the games, the more well known DoDonPachi DaiOuJou in 2002 used the same level planner that Toaplan used for Batsugun. Assembly obviously has coroutines, but we know that these games did not use a coroutine implementation for their bullet patterns. I obviously don't work at CAVE and can't just ask the devs what they were thinking, but if you play these games on the original hardware, even though every bullet has no behaviors attached the game will start to run slow when there are a lot of bullets on screen (and the game seems to be tuned around this fact). So I expect that even if the developers wanted to make the sorts of things we have in modern games, they would run too slowly to be practical.

To be fair, modern games that use danmakufu or ZUN's ECL or BulletML or Firedancer or Lua would probably have less distinction between "enemies" and "bullets" and the "enemies" in these games often do have some behavior attached. In the case of DoDonPachi DaiOuJou, each enemy that spawns uses one of a small fixed table of movement patterns.

I'm not sure what the claim about "most of these types of games originating in a certain time period" really means. A majority of bullet hell games were probably made in the last decade, and that will probably continue to be true for a long time. If you mean that it's common for these games to contain references to games from the 90s, I agree, but that has nothing to do with whether modern games are written in assembly or how the behaviors are scripted.
Flaw has Microsoft Authenticator overwriting MFA accounts, locking users out
I'm not sure it's bias, just sloppy reporting. I've been a Tesla driver for 5.5 years and had similar experience. I think I've had twice as many problems though (2 times in 5.5 years and had to move 10 feet). The only times I've had any range anxiety was in those rare locations (usually well up in mountain wilderness) where I had to rely on non-Tesla chargers.

The value of the Tesla Supercharger network is totally underrated by the mainstream press.
I suspect AMD's assessment at the time was similar so they offloaded fab and hopped on the TSMC bandwagon. It's worked out well for them. Interestingly Global Foundries decided not to keep chasing leading edge and instead invest deeply in nominal 12nm. They describe it as a "mature platform" that is "reliable and trusted for automotive, consumer, industrial and aerospace & defense applications".

As for whether this dynamic helps level the playing field between governments, I don't see how it would. Ever more expensive fabs make it harder rather than easier to stay competitive.

The aviation world has some historical parallels. China has been working to catch up on jet engines for at least 40 years and they're still not quite there yet. Not for lack of effort, engineering talent, theoretical understanding, etc, certain kinds of industrial capability are just hard and slow to build. A much smaller country would have no hope. My guess is chip production ends up being similar.
You could sen the KV cache and even the LoRA as input args to a static model.
> The reality is the most proprietary software companies of that area didn't make.

You're using 20/20 hindsight instead of putting yourself in the shoes of someone in 1996. The term "open source" was not even in wide use in 1996.

But actually even with hindsight your analysis is flawed. 1996 is right at the start of the .com bubble. A company whose software (WebOjects) was being used to power real world .coms (it was even being used by large companies like UPS and Dell) almost certainly would have risen tremendously in value (even as a private company). Now, if they would have been acquired before the 2000 crash is another discussion.