skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You need carpenter. Not developers.

If your business is running with wood, carpenters and you want to go online to improve your sales, you can.

I can help. Better, find a high traffic spot in your local town and set a shop or an advertisement board there.
According to GP, they synthesized 100 of them (created the actual molecules) and saw that ~60% of them successfully worked on antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Everything about Brave seems solid aside from the CEO.
what have you done in attempting to solve it?
Everything you need to know about Claude Prompt Caching
Good points but I think you're talking about 3 different concepts:

- Network effect: does the product get better with more users?

- Viral growth: does each user bring more users?

- PMF: is there a correspondence between the market, problem and solution that results in market pull?

You can have PMF without the other 2, which is not as strong. You can also have PMF for a niche that never grows to a mass market or have decent sales without PMF. Agreed having to buy your traffic and needing to go through the FAANG toll booth every time you want to access your audience is a problem.
Never allowed without jailbreaking. My iOS 3 device still has Cydia.
That's a temporary system stall when some critical part of the system is overloaded or blocked, usually the disk.

Or an out-of-memory condition, the system recovers when the OOM killer has killed a random process. If you were lucky that process was your game hogging ressources and when it went away the system recovered.

And for impressive German words? "Systemaufstauung mit urplötzlicher Lösung" (system bottleneck with sudden resolving), "Speicherüberlastung" (memory overload) or "Prozessabmurkser" (process terminator).

Note that I invented these words (oder auf gut Deutsch, ich habe mir diese Wörter aus den Fingern gesaugt).
Lots of good answers here already, but I can also add my own perspective. Fundamentally, you're right that there isn't really anything "special" about radicals. The reason I personally find the unsolvability of the quintic by radicals interesting is that you can solve quadratics, cubics, and quatrics (that is, polynomial equations of degree 2, 3, and 4) by radicals.

To say the same thing another way: the quadratic formula that you learned in high school has been known in some form for millennia, and in particular you can reduce the question of solving quadratics to the question of finding square roots. So (provided you find solving polynomial equations to be an interesting question) it's fairly natural to ask whether there's an analogous formula for cubics. And it turns out there is! You need both cube roots and square roots, and the formula is longer and uglier, but that's probably not surprising.

Whether you think n'th roots are "intrinsically" more interesting than general polynomial equations or not, this is still a pretty striking pattern, and one might naturally be curious about whether it continues for higher degrees. And I don't know anyone whose first guess would have been "yes, but only one more time, and then for degree 5 and higher it's suddenly impossible"!
Funny of you to say that so authoritatively when you're only demonstrating my point: there is no one correct way to replace bold text when you can't use bold text.
So in Russia you can't support the country you're currently at war with. In the West you can't criticize a man who stabbed three children at a Taylor Swift concert.

Would you like to reconsider who has greater free speech rights?

American as apple pie. You're a hacker, see where the IP I'm commenting from is located. What hubris to think millions of Americans aren't completely fed up with this fascist empire. If you're still unsure, for 20 years now Congressional approval hasn't cracked 30%.
I watched one of the videos, titled "Galois groups, intuitively".[1] It is about 18 minutes long and gave me a somewhat understandable overview what Galois groups are (not the theory yet!).

I suppose if you have the time to spare, at least it should give you an idea if the topic is of interest and whether you need to remind yourself of some mathematical concepts to be able to study rest of the material, or if it is too elementary for you and a shorter treatise from elsewhere would be preferable.

(I actually thought I had learned something about Galois theory in University algebra, but either I hadn't, or I've forgotten more than I wanted to admit. Which is to say, if you watch the video, your mileage may vary!)

[1] https://ed-ac-uk.zoom.us/rec/share/_I-EeZA8_399ArdZ1GyKtM_rD... (link copied from the page, I hope it works)
I'm not sure there is a formal threat model yet (I'm not a maintainer), but there has been discussion regarding this topic. You can checkout the Github forum page (https://github.com/markqvist/Reticulum/discussions) and there is also an Element channel at #reticulum:matrix.org

The threat model would be highly dependent on the carrier used. For example, if you're using LoRa an adversary would be using far different methods of disruption when compared to a traditional overlay network.
Jailbreaking and Unlocking phones was not even legal at the time, and did not receive a DMCA exemption until 2012, so it’s legally irrelevant.
Register your feedback here https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/docket-detail/24-240
I don't think "we're going to take away your vacations" is going to be a winning line, especially for essentially no payoff.
Not if NextNav https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41226802 gets a huge chunk of 900Mhz ISM band.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISM_radio_band

Register your feedback here https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/docket-detail/24-240
Sounds like things are okay for the article's n=1, Mr. Jeff Miller in Minnesota. For now.

But I smell a desperate attempt to whitewash the situations of millions of other gig delivery workers - who aren't making livable money in the micro-specialized sub-niche that Mr Miller has managed to get himself into.
They have to win every time in every jurisdiction including ones where they have not greased enough palms.
Thanks. No worries. British "national cloud" will be lots of shed
clouds wired up together. Or we'll create a storm in a teacup. :)
You're the one proposing to change real world policies. I find it really interesting that I'm speaking directly from the libertarian playbook and the anti-insurance folks in the conversation are telling me to trust the government regulations. Especially when those very government regulations would be eviscerated by the proposed changes.
Apple Design Award Winner Devin Davies Shares His Learning Strategies [video]
Know Your Term Sheet AI Prompt
Once upon a time, the dark arts of term sheets were closely guarded secrets. Now, we can take the help of AI & LLMs to understand them better.

I have tried this on many real term sheets, and it looks quite promising. One thing that's missing is building out the modelling scenario.
I think the don't do it if you are mixing, purist thinking cycles through for each UI and is generally pointless and doesn't serve people who take it up.

All the rat poison oriented window managers also have a great point and the ones with no mouse support at all might be perfect for many but it is silly and counter productive not to provide the mouse support because it is an anti pattern and pretend that all the users who need to see the benefits of avoiding the anti pattern, and practice [not] using it, are going to somehow magically end up trying the purist UIs.
Gemma explained: An overview of Gemma model family architectures
When I took real analysis, I didn't get an intuitive sense of limits and all that delta/epsilon stuff. It was too abstract. Strangely enough, when I read David Foster Wallace's "Everything and More" on the history of infinity it all made more sense, because he described all the paradoxes and dead ends that mathematicians had run into before Cauchy and others brought rigor to the problem. Wallace was a postmodern novelist. I don't know why he described infinity so clearly; I didn't enjoy his other work.
> you must check type of any single operand, find correct operator implemenation, find correct index operator family/class and many more all through querying system catalog.

Not with static typing.

The problem with PG is that it's not fully statically typed internally. SQLite3 is worse still, naturally. But a statically typed SQL RDBMS should be possible.
IANAL, so spitballing here, but it seems like this might be false imprisonment, given the use of handcuffs to restrain the student. It would be hard to argue this was a reasonable means of maintaining order when the student was not actively disrupting proceedings and when, say, simply having the kid ejected from the courtroom would have removed whatever disturbance was being presented.

It doesn’t seem that the handcuffing was connected to any sort of contempt proceeding. Judges are, as you note, given wide latitude to determine how to maintain order in their courts, but there are usually limits to how they can exercise their contempt power. It would seem, though, that handcuffing a student who is not actively disrupting proceedings or posing a threat without a formal contempt proceeding would be considered a due process violation, regardless. I expect having a member of the gallery handcuffed without being held in contempt exceeds that wide authority, so I wonder if the student couldn’t recover some damages for the tort.(Edit: Probably not, as judicial immunity would likely shield the judge from any civil action against him. There was a recent Sixth Circuit case—Orta v. Repp https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca6/23... —that upheld the immunity claim in a similar case of abuse of contempt power.[0])

But even if this incident is not criminally or civilly actionable, it is highly likely that the state judicial ethics commission might take a rather jaundiced view of such behavior.

[0] The record in the Orta case honestly makes this whole incident look trivial by comparison. If you want to see what it looks like when an asshole judge goes on a power trip, here you go: https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/3/2020/2020-O...

It should be noted Repp was later suspended for a year without pay by the Ohio Supreme Court.
gcc was first released in 01987, but it didn't replace its bison parser for c until gcc 4.1 https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.1/changes.html which was in 02006 https://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html, only 18 years ago, and 19 years after it was released. joseph myers first proposed doing this in 02004 https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg01969.h...

so gcc has literally been using a parser-generator-generated parser for c for more than half its existence, at which point it had already become the most popular c compiler across the unix world and basically the only one used for linux, which had already mostly annihilated the proprietary unix market. it was also imposingly dominant in the embedded space

and i think that kind of development path is fairly typical; getting a parser up and running is easier with a parser generator, but it can be tricky to get it to do strange things when that's what you want (especially with lalr, less so with peg)
I do the same, I worry that eventually someone's going to need to see my driver's license and refuse me because my ancient account info doesn't match.

"It says here that this shipment is for Firstname Lastname at 1 Main St, Yourcity, born January 1st in the same year as you. Your license has a different address and different birth day and month, so you're not the same person."
Dr. Lynn Ackler Passing
another open source project has died. At least we will always have Postgres.
Wow. And I'm assuming the publishers are now sprinting into the arms of rented, time-limited e-textbooks with DRM, and either eliminating or discouraging the sales of physical books that they can't fully kill resale of.

My wife asked me last week to help her get a textbook in a format that could be viewed on a reMarkable tablet, which can read PDFs but won't work with arbitrary DRM schemes. I checked my options and found the publisher selling some DRM crap, and some clearly illegal sites selling DRM-free PDFs. Since I found plenty of people vouching that they'd received what they bought, I chose to (using a Privacy card number) willingly buy from the criminals, since they were the only ones willing to provide me what I needed: an unencrypted PDF that we can actually use on the device we want.

I know publishers are afraid someone will email the PDF to the whole class, so that's why college textbooks probably ought to be folded into tuition, that way (1) publishers can get paid for the correct number of copies and (2) someone who actually has to pay the money (the school) is somewhat in the loop on textbook selection. It's broken now since those actually paying (students) have no say in book selection.
Obama wrote in his book "Promised Land", talking about campaign appearances:

> Once my speech was over and I walked off the stage to shake hands along the rope line, I often found people screaming, pushing, and grabbing. Some would cry or touch my face, and despite my best efforts to discourage it, young parents would pass howling babies across rows of strangers for me to hold. The excitement was fun and at times deeply touching, but it was also a little unnerving. At some basic level people were no longer seeing me, I realized, with all my quirks and shortcomings. Instead, they had taken possession of my likeness and made it a vessel for a million different dreams. I knew a time would come when I would disappoint them, falling short of the image that my campaign and I had helped to construct.

> I realized, too, that if supporters could mold bits and pieces of me into an outsized symbol of hope, then the vague fears of detractors could just as readily congeal into hate.

I guess as a politician, if you can con them good enough, they won't even be disappointed, they'll just start blaming other things when their idol doesn't live up to their expectations. Things like the "Deep State".
Clearly some types of history lend themselves very well to oral preservation. Religious texts and certain types of history come to mind.

I very much doubt though that ALL types of history would be good for that, let alone other types of information. Not a lot of dry econometrics textbooks lend themselves to rote memorization for example.
I think sooner or later we will see the arrival of groups like Children of Kali as described in KSR's book Ministry for the future.

It's going to be ugly.

If you haven't read the book, there's a nice review at https://www.americamagazine.org/arts-culture/2021/07/15/mins...
Are you just trying to expose a port in your computer through your router for friends to connect to? What is on the other end of the tunnel? If it's just an open Minecraft server for anyone to connect to by IP address (or dynamic DNS), you should be able to just configure your router to forward that port to your particular machine.

Apologies if I'm misunderstanding you. It's not clear what the tunnel is supposed to do in this case.
Who backed him?
that's a good point—it was pretty confusing when i wrote ur-scheme in scheme, or stoneknifeforth in stoneknifeforth, because i kept getting confused about which level of the language i was changing things in
At least the tech industry contributes something, which is more than I can say about music labels.
hot reloading can cause weird behaviors like this in particular
No, this is not the reason at all. Can you point to where in either lawsuit or decision this came up?

The fact is these were two different lawsuits with different judges with disagreeing outcomes. It's a real shame it happened this way - I feel no sympathy whatsoever for Google but it's unfair that Apple is free to continue their anticompetitive practices while their only potential competitor is going to be hamstrung. At least in USA.
Key here would be transformation rather than reproduction?

Youtube is mentioned in the 2013 brief:

>b. According to the YouTube “Terms of Service,” users who upload content
to YouTube retain all of their ownership rights in their content. By
uploading their content to YouTube, however, such users grant YouTube a
license to use, reproduce, and distribute such content.
>

>c. In general, the further reproduction and distribution of videos that are
taken from the Youtube.com platform violates the copyright of the
individual who uploaded that video to Youtube.com.
[dupe] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41248707
Personally, I'm trying to learn to accept the end of humanity in much the same way I hope to learn to accept my own eventual demise. It has not been easy for me.
It's actually a hideous argument. You could make tons of money with any service platform by bypassing all copyright that way. The only interesting thing here is that Google - all the way up to Sergei Brin - knew they were in the wrong. They knew it was piracy and yet chose to roll with it, because money. And the emails prove it. If held to the same standard, they would have to face the same repercussions.
I do wonder how strong the Apple lobby is to be able to completely circumvent the App Store issue.

This feels like a Monty Python sketch if they are attacking Google for the Play Store while ignoring the elephant in the room which is Apple.
The context of what I was referring to above was DMCA, not other things.

But regardless, that isn't true. Adsense has been a target of legal action for their illegal content:

https://money.cnn.com/2011/08/24/technology/google_settlemen...

And on top of that, their ads were ruled this month to be an illegal monopoly:

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/05/technology/google-antitru...
>I appreciate Kim Dotcom for running MegaUpload and later Mega, in a time when the internet was younger and wilder.

I like this. Us internet boomers got to learn and get everything for free. The new kids coming in are paywalled to hell :)
There are no clean image models. Zero. Using today's model architectures, the problem of using non-expressly-permitted data for training is insurmountable. I welcome anyone more knowledgeable on the matter to go ahead and comment about a counterexample before downvoting.

So if the artists prevail, image generators are donezo. Open source, proprietary, whatever. People saying otherwise just don't know enough about how they work.

You have heard of Adobe's Firefly. It is not clean. Adobe uses CLIP, T5, or something for text conditioning. None of those things were trained on expressly permitted content. Go ahead and ask them.

Maybe you have heard of Open Model Initiative. They are going going to use CLIP or T5. They have no alternative.

There are not enough license bureau images to train a CLIP model, not enough expressly licensed text content to train T5. A CLIP model needs 2 billion images to perform well, not the 600m Adobe claims they have access to. It's right in the paper.

Good luck training a valuable language model on only expressly permissioned content. You'd become a billionaire if you could keep such an architecture secret. And then when it does exist, such as with some translation models, well they underperform, so who uses them?

What do people want? I don't really care about IP, I care about, who is allowed to make money? Is only Apple, who controls the devices and accounts, and therefore can really enforce anti-piracy, permitted to make money? Only parties with good legal representation? It's not so black and white, not so cut and dried, who the good guys and bad guys are. We already live with a huge glut of content and raised interest rates, which have been 100x more impactful to the bottom line - financial and creative - of working artists. Why aren't these artists demanding that the Fed drops rates, or that back catalog media be delisted to boost demand for new media? It's not that simple either! Presumably a lot of people using these image and video generators are narrative creators of a kind too, like video game developers, music video makers, etc. Are they also bad guys?

There's no broad solution here, the legal victory here is definitely pyrrhic, but one thing's for sure: Apple, NVIDIA, Meta and Google will still be printing cash. The artists are advocating for a position that boils down to, "The only moral creative-economic status quo is my status quo."
This is written for someone with a higher reading level than me. I skimmed the first few paragraphs and have no idea what it is about beyond the title.
Honestly at the time of writing, only gjsman-1000 has given you the correct answer if somewhat incomplete. Everyone else is just telling you what they think should happen or putting it up to the difference in courts, while ignoring the evidence that Epic provided in the case.

The issue is not monopoly and this is where people get hung up. It’s about anticompetitive behaviour enabled by a monopoly (or any level of market dominance)

Google was found to be anticompetitive because even though they allow other stores and side loading, they were pushing OEMs to exclude other stores and making sweetheart deals to prevent apps going to other stores.

Hence they were using their market position to harm their competing stores.

Link to the findings https://www.theverge.com/23959932/epic-v-google-trial-antitr...

Apple has no competitor in the App Store for its platform outside of the EU, and therefore can’t be found anticompetitive on the same grounds that Google was.

They maybe found anticompetitive if they used their store to harm competition at the application level but that hasn’t been proven yet either. The closest has been in the EU (and to a lesser degree CA) where they were found in violation of anti-steering but those are distinct.
That’s a subjective opinion. You shouldn’t have a legal system built on opinions.
Meta Quest HDMI Link
A. Listen to Virtual Legality for almost a day’s worth of legal analysis by an actual lawyer. This was a substantial part of the reasoning, and why Epic’s own claim of anti-competitive conduct imploded.

B. You’re assuming the facts are similar for Google, as to Apple, in regards to their legal standing. They are not.
Easy for the Brave CEO to say they keep ManifestV2 support while these enterprise flags in the Chromium codebase are still present. Once these flags are removed, and the code is removed, and then the internal APIs to support the ManifestV2 code is removed it becomes a whole other thing.

You can try to keep the code, but every upstream code change becomes more painful to integrate. It is going to cost more and more, requiring more and more expertise with the Chromium codebase, like it is some kind of technical debt. Not even counting the potential security issues you can introduce by keeping the code alive, with Brave being a target that is large enough to matter for hackers but perhaps too small for security researchers.
That is a comparison.
Fyi, you can sign up to get the column via email for free. You should, he is fantastic.
Briar is a standalone messaging application while NomadNet is designed to work with the Reticulum Network Stack (https://reticulum.network), which is a complete alternative to TCP/IP
While sntrup761x25519-sha512 is a QC secure key exchange, sending a key over it doesn't count. It's not really a "pre-shared" key unless the sharing is done using organic, locally sourced sneakers. Unless FIPs, and then it's boots.
You can fight for freedom while being a capitalist. In fact, you can fight for freedom with capitalism.