skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There was a 4 MHz 65C02 model .. but not until 1988: The Apple IIc+.

You could lower the clock speed to 1 MHz for programs that relied on it, but the 65C02 did not support the unofficial/undocumented instructions of the original 6502 so there were still some programs that did not work.
>men have historically dominated society and decreasing their influence is a leveling process

RICH men have hist...

RICH men in the last 150 years figured out they can use poor mens' women (Hitler, anyone?) to get wealthier and solidify power. With double the tax base and nobody but the State to raise kids, the middle class became too mired in distractions and day-to-day survival and lacked intergenerational memetic staying power to address the benefactors of modern feminism: the moneyed class. Humans create social groups to survive in nature. One of the strongest bonds is the family, much stronger than bonds to the State are. The State has an interest in reducing family bonds which might compete against the State for piety. We like to get all warm and fuzzy about social contracts and such, but the fact is the State is a human-ranch and the owners of the ranch want you productive like bees in a hive and never able to throw them off.

I digress. When it comes to merit, I strongly believe one is a fool for rejecting an otherwise ideal candidate just because he's black or not really a he. When you're making a family sure all that matters, but when running a business your goal is to make money not be the whitest most male business out there regardless of revenue! I do think UC schools deflating Asian SAT scores for social justice is as racist as inflating them.
> it comes to 9%. of one of the cores! also it would run in 0.5% of the pi's ram

9% from one app, 9% from another, pretty soon we're talking about real power consumption / battery life

And even the 9% that you find trivial is something I, as an user, could use for something that gives me a benefit instead of your game-like GUI.

> so it makes sense to trade off cpu consumption and ram usage for faster experimentation in a lot of cases

It does not. If it has nothing animated, you'd better not redraw it. Anything else is lack of respect for the user's resources.
That paper doesn't even mention the word anomaly or detecting them.
IMO, “wrong question”, but thanks for asking.

IMHO - “class” definitions are really just a data structure (abstractly, a possibly-nested hash) with associated functions, and that’s it.

This is extremely apparent in Perl, where that’s literally what a “class” is - a hash data structure “blessed” with a class name. JS is almost identical (a class is a hash where some of the values are functions), and “under the hood” both Ruby and Python are similar (although in very different ways - consider that the first arg in a member function in Python is the instance).

Database schema is (usually/mostly) just that structure without those functions; then you maybe use an ORM to provide them again.

So, IMO, on a theory and design level, both the database table and the data part of a class definition are “data structures” (note that you should include in considerations the relationships between data structures)
Why not simply an all-you-can-eat time-based payment (weekly, monthly, annually), distributed on the basis of the sources you've read, preferably with some true-cost-of-production adjustment (e.g., algorithmic or AI hash doesn't get compensated on the same basis as true shoe-leather / long-distance-travel journalism).

You fill a bucket. It's drained, based on what you read/view/listen. Or otherwise equitably shared based on some global allocation basis if access nothing --- you're still benefiting by the positive externality of the informed polity which journalism creates --- if you read nothing.

This ensures a stable funding basis, you have a predictable cost basis, you can direct the allocation based on your own access patterns, the common weal benefits even if you don't utilise the resource.

Note that much of this is the same as an ad-funded media, excepting that you can't direct spending, the allocations are far less public-benefit oriented, and the costs per household are far higher: roughly $700 per person for advanced countries (North America, Europe, Japan, Australia/NZ), based on a $700 billion spend and roughly 1 billion population. What we have now costs an immense amount and is failing media and journalism badly.
How’s it work? Webassembly? Webile?
With decades of exponential growth in CPU power, and memory size, and disk space, and network speed, and etc. - the penalties for shit design mostly went away, so you could usually get away with code monkeys writing crap as fast as they could bang on the keyboards.
terrorist do illegal things, including smuggling in guns.

not great to take away firepower from citizens while the terrorists have guns.

you end up waiting around for the police, which may or may not be prepared or even arrive on time.
Were those all within the same conversation, or the beginnings of separate conversations?
Equivalent in Rust: https://github.com/embassy-rs/embassy/blob/main/examples/rp/...
> Blockbuster stores were so ubiquitous and I never thought streaming would be a thing considering the state of the internet

Netflix started drinking Blockbuster's milkshake in the DVDs-by-mail day, because you didn't have to worry about late fees.

Blockbuster should have eliminated late fees and offered DVDs by subscription in-store, but they made too much money off the late fees.
What were you hoping to do with the code that the license prevents you from doing? Their license lets you do anything you want except rip them off.
They could have licensed the IP from the same company.
Speaking of data structures, I am curious what you guys think of the Entity Attribute Value model.

I worked on an e-commerce "platform" that used EAV and I always struggled to write queries to find anything I needed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entity%E2%80%93attribute%E2%80...
And posts with links in them are punished in different ways, like getting suppressed in algorithmic feeds. So instead of just linking to a thing directly people are left with mentioning “link in bio”.
Concrete mathematics is significantly more advanced though, if I'm not mistaken it even introduces the basics of analytic combinatorics with OGFs.
Something at the same level would be the basic competitive math curriculum in combinatorics and number theory.
A huge percentage of these cases would be prevented if the leadership at Company-level and up actually took SHARP cases seriously and didn't retaliate against [1] or belittle soldiers who report assault/harassment. Or the fact that, until recently, it was at the commander's discretion whether to prosecute an assault/harassment as a crime [2].

>there's been a lack of realism from leadership about the actual realities..

I can assure you most Platoon leaders, Company commanders, etc. are very aware of the realities in enlisted living quarters; they are simply apathetic about them.
A SHARP complaint becomes another pile of paperwork on their desk they don't want to deal with (see [2]).

I think the tendency to blame the 18-22 year olds with "dysfunctional backgrounds" who "barely made it through high school" places the blame on the lower enlisted while ignoring the military leadership's responsibility for decades of documented failure in addressing this issue.

Consider the following:

> Most Service members identified the alleged offenders as men and often of the same rank as
the victim or some other higher ranking military member in their unit. However, an estimated 44
percent of women and an estimated 35 percent of men identified at least one alleged offender
as someone in their chain of command [3].

Also consider reasons for not reporting:

>Despite these differences, the top three reasons provided for not
reporting were consistent between men and women: (1) did not think anything would be done;
(2) thought it was not serious enough to report; and (3) worried about potential negative
consequences from military coworkers or peers [3].

In my opinion, the problem is at the top of the hierarchy, not the bottom.

(Sorry to throw so much in this comment, but I grow really tired of people thinking this problem is some case of lower enlisted being dumb hooligans who can't control their urges while ignoring the consistent and systemic failures of senior officers and NCO within the DoD to address the problem at all.)

[1] https://taskandpurpose.com/news/army-reserve-416th-sexual-as...
[2] https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-military/2023/12/28/sexu...
[3] https://www.sapr.mil/sites/default/files/public/docs/reports...
So it seems that over multiple years and considerable hours spent on this chore, the payout was a few hundred dollars? Assuming it was corrected? That's not a great cost/benefit ratio.
The difference is a funding floor in the form of a diversified, universally-applied funding basis, in the form of taxes (at multiple governmental levels) and/or an ISP-implemented media fee. Media and journalism generally presently lack this, and are suffering badly for it.

The reframing question is fair, but asking why people won't pay directly for subscriptions under the present model remains a useful excercise, and is what I've attempted here.
Argued this for a long time yet so many devs insist on MongoDB and other similar schemaless data stores
Is it possible to create an open source keyboard for iOS?
> When I read this quote, I actually was able to recognize countless examples in the past of this. I once worked on a project where we spent quite a while optimizing complex algorithms, only to realize that by restructuring our data, we could eliminate entire classes of problems. We replaced a 500-line function with a 50-line function and a well-designed data structure. Not only was the new code faster, but it was also much easier to understand and maintain. (Of course, then the problem also shifted “down the stack” to where the majority of toil was in restructuring existing data.)

This is really a preference, then. I encountered almost this exact sort of problem in my last project. I wanted a simpler database design and more complex querying/code, they wanted a significantly more complex database design that was harder to understand (for everyone but the guy who spent all of one weekend designing it) but simpler querying/code (that was also more plentiful as a result). The question really is, where do you prefer your complexity to go? Do you want to lean on the database, or your code?

Simple example, you have a portfolio of stock that constantly changes in composition and value over time. Do you: 1) only store the current model of the portfolio in a "portfolios" table and the current prices of stocks in a "stock_prices" table and use a separate history table for both (with stored procedure triggers to automatically copy all changes to it) to store all previous versions that can then be queried separately if needed, OR 2) store each change in both quantity and price across multiple tables, no separation of what is "current" vs. what is "historical" other than the relationships that are (properly, hypothetically) set up via an "intent_versions" table at the top level, requiring a bunch of joins to actually determine the state of the portfolio both now and at any point in the past?

I opted for the former because I have no fear of complex queries, the center of thought-mass of the team leaned towards the latter. WWYD?
OP linked to a breakdown of federal spending.

I'm not pursuing an angle here, just lending detail.
> If you've been explicitly asked to not report on a thing, and then you do. That's a jerk move. There shouldn't have to be legal incentive to do the right thing.

NDAs are the way companies ask a reporter not to report on a thing. It's a valid agreement between two parties. The jerk move is expecting people to adhere to your version of what "the right thing" is. Not everybody shares your opinion on the matter, hence the existence of NDAs.
Personally I feel like crap if I don't exercise, I don't know how people who don't exercise motivate themselves to not exercise.
C++ is a notoriously difficult language to parse [1], so hand-rolling a parser (even for a subset of the language) is an impressive feat. It's also interesting that they decided to implement their own tokenizer and lexer instead of using something "off the shelf".

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_vexing_parse
I'm now learning German in Duolingo, and I noticed a correlation between how hard it is for me to learn one more pack of a vocabulary and how this vocabulary is relevant for me.

There is nothing that I cannot understand, but when some words do not relate to my needs I need to make a conscious effort to learn them. When the words are the ones I'd happily use, I'll learn them easily without any effort, I just need to spend enough time with Duolingo.

I believe that people who do not care about physics are having the very same issues with calculus that was explained with references to physics. Probably they can overcome this difficulties, like I can overcome my difficulties with uninteresting words, but it means they need to spend more effort and more time to get the same result.
Which is exactly why we are back into Public Domain/Shareware kind of models, and GPL is an endangered license model, only some old school projects keep it around.

It will be even worse after the GPL developer generation is gone.
It's the users phone. like a computer, we should be allowed to install whataever app we want.
Good article on the high level concepts of a knowledge graph, but some concerning mischaracterizations of core functions of ontologies supporting the class schema and continued disparaging of competing standards-based (RDF triple-store) solutions. That the author omits the updates for property annotations using RDF* is probably not an accident and glosses over the issues with their proprietary clunky query language.

While knowledge graphs are useful in many ways, personally I wouldn't use Neo4J to build a knowledge graph as it doesn't really play to any of their strengths.

Also, I would rather stab myself with a fork than try to use Cypher to query a concept graph when better standards-based options are available.
Huh? It's an MIT publication.
>It used to be. It should be.

Why is that?

And does making the military a "men's space" address sexual assault against men, committed by men?
You might as well say there's no "magic number" of bricks we can stack on top of you before you are squished because we don't know precisely what that number is (yet.) But clearly there is a limit, even though we might have some difficulty saying exactly what it is.
Thanks for pointing this out. I couldn't get past the paywall of the original article and so posted this one. Also thanks to the person who posted the archived ft link!
You’ve largely missed or ignored my point. If you change the game your AI either fails to adapt or adapts in an AI way. But it can’t reliably adapt in a human way without data on how humans adapt to the change. That’s just not how it works. Maia won’t mimic humans hypothetical behavior if you make it so that bishops can also move like knights.

There’s nothing wrong with using bots in play test data but you shouldn’t ever expect an optimization algorithm to generate fun balanced game mechanic stats based on their behaviors by tweaking things until the bots are evenly matched.
It’s basically the standard. How else do you add arbitrary key/values to entities? You either normalize into EAV, Map column, or a pair of Array columns.
This is the principle behind “How to Design Programms” [1]: Bild your data structures, then the form of your functions on those structures should correspond more or less exactly to it.

[1]: https://htdp.org/2023-8-14/Book/index.html
In what languages can chatGPT write anything remotely sane and deployable?
Also heard "slow is pro" - along the same lines - used by trained lifeguards.-
Thank you, doomlaser, for uploading this screenshot for us.
lol. The full video is here --> https://x.com/quasa0/status/1823933017217482883
0.15% the speed of light
I’d argue software design has never been taken seriously by industry. It’s always cast in negative terms, associated with individuals seen as politically wrong/irrelevant and brings out ton of commenters who can’t wait to tell us about this one time somebody did something wrong, therefore it’s all bad. Worse, design commits the cardinal sin of not being easily automated. Because of this, people cargo cult designs that tools impose on them, and chafe at the idea that they should think further on what they’re doing. People really want to outsource this thinking to The Experts.

It doesn’t help that isn’t really taught, but is something you self-teach over years, it is seen as less real than code (ergo, not as important). All of these beliefs are ultimately self-limiting and keep you at advanced beginner stage in terms of what you can build, however.

Basically, programmers collectively choose to keep the bar as low as possible and almost have a crab-like mentality on this subject.
>i only have buringh's figures from this scholium because buringh's paper itself has not been preserved in sci-hub and will probably be lost in the next century

I accessed it just fine. Try the doi link: 10.1163/9789047428640. The author is the same as the one I quoted above, and he gives the same 25% figure there. I don't see any specific argument about papyrus in the text you quoted though, which is what I was hoping you would link to. From what little I read about it, it seems parchment was the primary medium for manuscripts in Europe starting from the 4th century:

>Parchment, however, did not come into general use for book
production until some centuries later, even though it had a marked
advantage over papyrus in its greater durability; moreover, it was
better suited than papyrus for writing on both sides. It was at about
the start of the fourth century A.D. that it began to take the place of
papyrus in the manufacture of the best books, and the works con-
sidered worth preserving were gradually transferred from papyrus
roll to parchment codex. It is in this century that the great parchment
codices of the Greek Bible (the Vaticanus and the Sinaiticus; see
p p . 62-7) were prepared; and the earliest extant parchment manu-
scripts of pagan works date probably from the same century. But
the use of papyrus did not cease then, and papyrus manuscripts of
the New Testament have been found dating from the fifth, sixth, and
seventh centuries.[0]

So it seems difficult to blame the loss of Greek works in Europe on the lack paper specifically. An argument could be made that by the end of the Roman Empire, nobody cared about Greek science anymore, which meant they didn't feel the need to preserve it in parchment and instead only used papyrus, which later deteriorated. That is something I could agree to, as the Romans never really cared about science (or anything intellectual) in the first place. I would still want to see some links that actually make this argument (which I had assumed you had when I asked for them).

My main point here is that it is hard to say that Greek works were lost due to lack of technology (either in the strong form given by GP or the weak form you proposed here). More likely in my opinion is that literate Europe was not so interested in Greek works to begin with in the early middle ages. Most scribes were monks or part of the clergy generally, and they were mainly interested in ecclesiastical works, and that is what got written down, copied and studied. I would also suggest that Greek works were probably not universally seen as heretical at this point (early middle ages) as there was not such a strong central church/Pope which only developed in earnest starting in the 8th century (or so I recall). Although I have no evidence for that last claim.

[0] Metzger, Bruce (2005). The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 8. source found via https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papyrus full text here: https://ia600208.us.archive.org/9/items/TheTextOfNewTestamen...
Family poisoned after using AI-generated mushroom identification book
My abstract was accepted as a poster only but that's life:) Thanks!
In short, GATT is the main building block you use when moving data between devices over Bluetooth Low Energy.
The last time an administration engineered a budget surplus, voters soundly rejected a continuation of that regime in favor of an 8-year spending binge. A substantial number of voters are planning on voting this fall for the candidate whose economic policy has contributed the most to the current debt.

Generally, looking at the last 30 years or so, it is evident that voters do not care about this issue very much.
> This is why we can't have nice things.

That's one interpretation. Another interpretation is that Valve has been around more than long enough to see how these things go. What makes you think they didn't want it to leak to generate buzz? The lack of any sort of controls around their new game suggests this might have been part of their marketing strategy.
The last left-wing group that I think people were really afraid of in the US was the thoroughly unhinged

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbionese_Liberation_Army

which leaves me wondering how much deadlier bullets really can be if you lace them with cyanide. See

https://www.start.umd.edu/publication/comparison-political-v...

which says

Across both datasets, we find that radical acts perpetrated by individuals associated
with left-wing causes are less likely to be violent. In the United States,
we find no difference between the level of violence perpetrated by right-wing
and Islamist extremists. However, differences in violence emerge on the
global level, with Islamist extremists being more likely than right-wing
extremists to engage in more violent acts.

The stereotype of the violent extremist in the US is ideologically confused: they find they had a copy of The Communist Manifesto in their room but drove their neighbors crazy listening to Rush (the Canadian band) at 3am.
Point addressed in TFA. Yes, is a problem, but male-on-female assault rate is an OOM greater.
Maybe it’s because “An estimated 91% of victims of rape & sexual assault are female and 9% male. Nearly 99% of perpetrators are male.”?

https://www.humboldt.edu/supporting-survivors/educational-re...
> did people really believe all those stories about their pantheon

They did, in the same way we still believe in the horoscope, lucky numbers, miraculous diets or having success by reading the same books CEOs read.

Does it really brings bad luck if 13 people sit at the same table for a dinner?

And what about Friday the 13th?

In many sports competitions the number 17 is removed, because, you know, better safe than sorry.
It’s also available on AltStore PAL
Strict types are a great way to paint yourself into a corner. Good design should only impose strict types within a single module, with very loose coupling outside the module (meaning loose types)

Having a well defined data model is important, but you often can't really know what that data model should be until you've banged on a prototype. So the faster (in the long run), "better" way is to first prototype with very loose types and find what works, and then lock it down, within the scope of the above paragraph