skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> (...) throwing an exception in a noexcept function is undefined behavior.

Small but critical correction: noexcept functions can throw exceptions. What they cannot do is allow exceptions to bubble up to function invokers. This means that it is trivial to define noexcept functions: just add a try-catch block that catches all exceptions.
I turned my proxmox server off as I look to transition to something much less power hungry (still have my Unraid up) but I set up portainer in a turnkey environment and was setting up all my docker apps through there. Is it better to use separate LXCs?
most kids will likely still carry a phone, likely on their person, and try to sneak occasionally. Others will have their phone in their backpack.

And teachers will still carry phones, which they can hand to any kid during an incident if they need to focus on corralling students.

This decentralization is imo more resilient to a school shooter scenario than a centralized cubby system.
Schools there allow dogs: https://www.greenwichtime.com/news/article/Land-mine-detecti...
> If the ruling had capped it to 14 or 30 days, that would be a useful ruling

How confident are you this has no good exceptions? That’s why a reasonableness standard exists. To permit edge cases.
I dunno, I like the simplicity of it, if you have any problems, let's find a solution together.

Compare that to stackoverflow, where you need to first spend 5 minutes studying all the subsites and decide where you try and submit your question, and hope it won't be closed in 2 minutes saying not the right place to ask, not the right format, you asked too many questions too quickly, etc...
Do you have sources for your calculations? Because that sounds pretty much not possible for a set of small houses to compete with dense city neighborhoods
> Fast 4K: Bold doesn't drop a frame on a 144hz 4K monitor, using <1 CPU core

> Responsive: Input latency is <5ms, UI and GDB responds instantly

I can't say that I've ever considered frame rate when choosing a text editor.
> Yet nowadays it appears Germany essentially outsources nuclear power generation to its neighbors

If German voters had anything to say about other countries' power generation our neighbours would also be shutting down their reactors, or at the very least replacing their worst reactors.

But as it happens German voters have very little say in how other countries run their energy grid. And the people in charge of actually running the German energy grid don't care as much, they are just happily buying and selling energy to keep the grid stable. And in the last 20 years there has only been one year where Germany has imported more electricity than it exported, so it's not like we outsource our grid
https://www.coursera.org/learn/discrete-optimization
> What’s the URL to see tweets on a specific hashtag?

Example: https://x.com/hashtag/earthquake
Why yes?
bad things happen.
On searching for the mentioned model “bad one” it sounds like it’s provided by a British company “Brit alliance”, although these may be modified robots from another company.
"Us vs Them" was an actual line in the movie "Pirates of Silicon Valley", which was about Apple and Microsoft in the 80s. The phrase in the movie was referring to Macintosh vs Apple II camps within the company.
>Absolutely false. It's not even in top 10. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries...

You must be joking. Venezuela is 7th in the free speech index of that ranking.

Furthermore, you have 4 EU countries in the ranking, all higher vs USA. Those 4 EU countries are subject to ECHR, which has ruled freedom of speech does not apply :

- to protect the religious feelings of others [1]

- to restrict content that was tasteless [2]

- to say outrageous things [3]

Yet, all 3 examples above are constitutionally protected in USA. This sort of thing makes it very difficult to take the rest of your commentary at face value.

[1] https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/otto-pr...

[2] https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/leroy-v...

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perin%C3%A7ek_v._Switzerland
One of the outstanding problems of our generation, 21 comments. Nice.
> most stores have effective zero cell reception

Is this intentional or a consequence of closed brick construction?
Great article, shared with my team. Nick Kokonas mentioned is also the founder of the booking app Tock.
Nice...who is he sending a truck to next, Kim Jong Un and the Ayatollah?
I am glad it worked for you.

I have gotten good results from calendar blocking, so obviously I disagree with Davids rule about only putting things in the calendar that has to be done then. I can see his point for a physical calendar, but on a digital calendar you can have a (say) red calendar that your "must be done at this time or not at all" appointments can be added. That way when you see a red calendar entry you known what it means.

This was not really practical in Davids time.
Agreed. His hacking day of the week is definitely Wednesday
At 4K, naive implementations for text rendering no longer cut it.
> We will have to wait

I seem to remember something about "justice delayed".

Sure these things are complicated. But coming to a just conclusion sooner rather than later should also be a goal, not just dotting Is and crossing Ts. Of course for law specialists such as lawyers and judges minutiae seem important. But to me it seems the overall goal of the entire concept has been forgotten. Or maybe is ignored on purpose.
> what.. noexcept throws exception..? what kind of infinite wisdom led to this

Not wisdom at all, just a very basic and predictable failsafe.

If a function that is declared to not throw any exception happens to throw one, the runtime handles that scenario as an eggregious violation of its contract. Consequently, as it does with any malformed code, it terminates the application.
Another user made a good analogy in a recent thread, and they said something to the effect of: it's like self driving cars, the computers can do 99% of it when conditions are perfect, but it's the 1% that can't be programmed that has life and death impact.

Or like a coworker said: a monkey can do our job 99% of the time, it's the other 1% where we earn our pay.

If I had a M-F/9-5, I wouldn't have the same issue about the pay, however there are 15,000 controllers across the U.S., and none of them have a M-F/9-5. If the U.S. airspce was restricted to M-F/9-5, then our economy would grind to a halt, billions if not trillions would be lost in productivity, our military would be tied with its hands behind its back, etc.

---

I used to recommend ATC as a career for people, not anymore. I've heard of other controllers telling people that they convinced to become ATC that they're now sorry that they did. When talent leaves, and talent recomends to other talent to choose a different career, there's going to be problems down the road. The adoption of technological advancement over the past several decades in U.S. ATC has been abysmally-slow, I'm afraid it won't make up for the brain drain.

Pay a little more money now while there are still good controllers that can train future good controllers, or pay a lot more in other ways later when the talent is gone and can't come back.

Opinions are my own and not necessarily that of the Federal Aviation Administration.
It was never a big lineup as well. For any generation there were only a few models.
I'm confused about whether/how this is related to https://github.com/tteck/Proxmox/
Were you eavesdropping on our conversations? B^>
Show HN: We're tired of LangChain and you are too, so we built Mirascope
> Renewables are now cheaper than fossils

They're cheap because they're produced in China (>80% of worldwide supply) that runs on fossils (>80% of their energy). Try producing a solar panel using electricity from a solar panel and it becomes much more expensive. Use that new panel to produce yet another panel and it becomes prohibitively expensive. The whole thing is a mirage.
As a protocol tcp should be able to utilize a long fat pipe with a large enough receive window. You might want to check what window scaling factor is used and look for a tunable. I accept that some implementations may have limits beyond the protocol level. And even low levels of packet loss can severely affect throughput of a single stream.

A bigger reason you want multiple streams is because most network providers use a stream identifier like the 5-tuple hash to spread traffic, and support single-stream bandwidth much lower than whatever aggregate they may advertise.
This claim is false for a lot of modern language runtimes which use tracing garbage collection, like the CLR (C#/VB), JVM (Java/Kotlin/Scala/etc), Go, BEAM (Erlang/Elixer), etc.

There are no hard promises about when or even whether GC will reclaim a particular piece of garbage, precisely to enable optimizations and necessary compromises. Application availability is often more important than immediately collecting every possible piece of garbage. The use of tagging, generations, arenas, etc. all allow the GC to use heuristics and apply different collection regimes to different pieces of garbage.
Laptop-like CrowView Note ready to work with Pi, phones and mini-PCs
Feels like stackoverflow on day 0. At very least make the problems discoverable via Google/bing to grow. Login to comment. Don’t need thr draconian moderation and if done right could be a breath of fresh air.
I once developed an app and a site before i really knew people would actually want to pay for it!

rookie mistake!
lesson learnt:

don't make before you sell
No, it’s not. I’ve been viewing tweets on profiles for months now, all without an account.

It is accurate that threads don’t work. I don’t particularly care about follow ups, if it was important they should have said it at the top level. People making a bunch of lede burying 1/N threads and expecting the masses to wade through Twitter’s molasses UI to get to the damn point is why I left.
It is not that Sufficiently Smart Compiler arrives or not. The problem is that VLIW architectures are a moving target - you can only really optimize for one specific chip. The next iteration of the same architecture brings a totally different superposition of performance considerations, thus rendering the previous optimization strategies inefficient.

This is the Achilles Heel of any VLIW architecture. A Sufficiently Smart Compiler gets outdated with a new chip revision. The previously compiled binary files that worked fast on a previous revision of the architecture, start to work slowly on newer chips.
Why is anybody troubled by the waste then? Why won't they just build some reactors of this kind?
> why my kid needs recorder, many abusers try to down play such attacks!

Have you ever had anyone in a position of authority do anything about a dog sniffing or licking your kid? Because if so, that’s national-news level hilarious.
You are in Europe so you may not be aware of the situation in North America especially Canada and the government mandated surge of migrants from India and the tensions it has created.

> Neither are east european ones, Indonesian ones, or American ones for that matter. For the (unsubstantiated) claim that actual humans have been replaced.

The representation of Indonesian workers here is nil. Eastern European migrants are also unable to compete with the suppressed wages that Indian migrants can fill. It's an overwhelming motif playing out across all industries.

You can take a look at the scale of the exploitation of Indian migrant labour for reference:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41284574
Hi! library author here. Happy to answer any questions. Thanks for taking a look!
It's not a huge difference, the advantage of individualized LXC's is you can make backups of them. If you run 1 VM with all your docker stuff you can't as easily restore an individual service if you mess something up.
property is also not a person.
You can be right about the stats but still wrong with your reasoning. Markets are often impacted by all kinds of events.
Associated type:

pub trait Iterator {
type Item;
[...]
}

vs generic type:

pub trait Iterator<Item> {}

The associated type version can only be implemented once per MyType.

impl Iterator for MyType {
type Item = i32;
}

The generic version can be implemented multiple times. For example:

impl Iterator<String> for MyType
impl Iterator<i32> for MyType

https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch19-03-advanced-traits.html
I tend to think that the idea of surveillance driven advertising as a model is itself an excuse or justification for intrusion and eradication of personal privacy. I'm saying the whole of that industry was all about spying from the beginning, subsidised by the governance structure, and that the idea that there is actually much of an industry there at all, is am excuse to provide plausible deniability. I don't think online advertising works at anything like the scales we are told.
This would be my guess. It's hard to imagine Kasparov didn't notice. There are variants of chess where the pieces are organized differently and obviously as the game progresses beyond the opening you can get into all sorts of positions. I'm sure Kasparov can calculate from any given arrangement of the pieces. The difference would be that moves that he would play automatically because of preparation now have to be thought through deeper.

I'm impressed parent survived that many moves. Must be a good chess player even with the simultaneous game setting.
From the original project Github README.md [1]

> Be cautious of copycat or coat-tailing sites that exploit the project's popularity with potentially malicious intent. Please only trust information from https://Helper-Scripts.com/ or https://tteck.github.io/Proxmox/.

[1] https://github.com/tteck/Proxmox
I think you mean sideways, not upside-down? There should be a white square in the bottom-right corner from both players’ point of view.
Yes, it is common to forget the whole supply chain and externalities.
> Btw, it looks like someone started adding IA64 support to QEMU: https://github.com/amarioguy/qemu-itanium

It's good to have that available. Students can examine actual software for hardware that'll soon be recycled.
Sufficiently Smart Compilers™ exist, but they are called GPU drivers and GPGPU compute platforms.
Yes, this is the actual reason. In Java you're restricted to one implementation of an interface for a type by syntactic construction (classes list their interfaces in their header and each interface can only appear once). In Rust there is a similar restriction (called coherence), but it takes into account all of the parameters to a trait, including its generics.

An illustrative example of the difference: `AsRef<T>` and `Deref` have almost identical signatures, except that the target type for `AsRef` is a parameter and for `Deref` is an associated type. `String` implements `AsRef<str>`, `AsRef<Path>`, and so on, but only `Deref<Target = str>`.

The blog post's meandering description the difference between static and dynamic dispatch has no relevance whatsoever.
Why are terminal "movies" always a gif with no video controls that move at the speed of light?
So much of this data is so wrong. It's bizarrely and obviously wrong.
Secure Deletion of Data from Magnetic and Solid-State Memory (1996)
No Man's Sky Astroneer, Enshrouded are not voxel games AFAICT. Of those, I've only played No Man's Sky, which I agree at some level is similar to Minecraft in gameplay
It angers the language pedant in me. Surely they meal electrically charged?!? Even in these modern times, not everything is electronic!
yeah let em have flip phones with T9 word and snake. those Nokias had the benefit of being invincible
> This website is not affiliated with the Proxmox VE Helper Scripts repository. This website is simply a redesign of the original website, with a focus on readability and security.

I'm assuming there's no malicious intent here, but tteck explicitly warns against these kinds of copycat sites.
Even if there were some positive uses, the risk associated with misuse isn’t worth it. I don’t think these datasets should exist at all. Users should have a right to privacy and to not be manipulated for profit.
> Except in TS this truly has no benefit besides superficial perception of improved type safety.

You know the saying that everyone who drives slower than you is a moron, and everyone who drives faster than you is a lunatic? You seem to be in a mode of "every type system more powerful than what I'm used to is unnecessary", and I'm sure you believe the other half: "every type system weaker than what I'm used to is for morons".

Keep in mind, this article is about a detail inside the compiler that makes type inference "just work" seemingly magically. It's not a detail you need to worry about. If you think powerful type inference and mapped types are just for the "perception of improved type safety", you are revealing that you have simply never attempted to learn them.

> if you have powerful type system, it does not mean it warrants pushing it to its limits, and strikes me as the behavior everyone tends to suffer from in the middle of a learning process of a new tool.

These kinds of features are more for library developers. You should be very glad that the people who make the libraries you rely on every day have access to these kinds of features, because when they do their job well, things "just work" so invisibly that you have no way of appreciating what's actually going on in the background. These "astronaut developers" that you disrespectfully deride are the entire reason you're able to do your job at all. Have a little respect.
Detailed specs for dozen Intel Arrow Lake desktop CPUs leaks ahead of launch
There is a documentary about the stabbing made from a left-wing news blog that was also censured and a lot of people got mad.
Journalist J. German stabbed to death. Vegas watches accused politician on trial
How are these 2 things related? Why do devs need to work on a game full time for it to be successful?
Even then, the ISA of GPUs is typically hidden behind the driver which recompiles shaders on-the-fly.
I just spent a week trying to share a new hard drive via samba and failed completely. "Respects them" my ass.
Apple might be implementing a VPN censorship order in Brazil
You should put some boundaries around the types of problems you want people to solve. ‘World hunger’ and ‘peace in the middle east’ are obviously out of scope of a site like this, but you’ll get others that will fall into the ‘wicked problem’ category.

Problems that relate to social issues for example. Or even technological problems that cause or stem from social issues.

I don’t recall who came up with it but there’s a social theorist who stated that anyone trying to ‘solve’ wicked problems is either ill-informed about the nature of the problem, or has other motives. The best outcome is to improve the situation for those affected by it.

It’s kinda hand wavy pop psychology sometimes, but it’s important to understand the concept before wading knee deep into something and making the problem worse for all involved.
Now I'll have to keep my eye out for shots that emphasise one-point or three-point instead of the common two-point perspective?
I would get one, but my apartment lease forbids them on "water damage" reasons. I've only seen a clause like this in my most recent lease.
And when I try to recall something, nowhere to be found.
China-the-people or China-the-state?
How weird, tteck's site is great and what is this nonsense about security.
I think a lot of people talking about Synchthing must have used it in a different way in the past. It has a QR code now that encodes that 16-digit number or whatever that is used for the same purposes of key exchange and initial handshaking.

I use it with my wifes phone to transfer files between her drawing tablet and her Linux system she uses for Blender every day.
Aren't nuclear power plants generally ran by enterprises which are less concerned about sales and stocks than car manufacturers are?
Are these warrants issued retroactively? Some of the most egregious cases of civil forfeiture seem to be literal cash grabs on the side of the road.
As someone who really needs high-performance 3D from Rust [1], I wish more of the people who really want to build a game engine would focus on 3D. You don't need Rust for a 2D game. It's overkill. There are already too many 2D engines.

[1] https://video.hardlimit.com/w/7usCE3v2RrWK6nuoSr4NHJ
Soundly Handling Linearity – Sigplan Blog
Do classes no longer have a wired phone?
It must be tricky since I don't think you understood Popper at all.

Popper was completely in favor of free speech, and a completely open society, with no censorship except in the cases of actual violence:

"he is known for his vigorous defence of liberal democracy and the principles of social criticism that he believed made a flourishing open society possible" [1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_popper#
This happened to my mom too. She told me she can't do any more photos because her storage is full. So I checked her android phone a and somehow the cloud backup got activated (we explicitly turned that off!!) and our family photos were uploaded to google cloud..

I hate google so much for doing this.
Not really. There have been phone calls to 911 during school shootings but reading a few reports, it's never made a difference since schools tend to be hardwired straight to dispatch which is most important. Big failings like Uvalde has been terrible response by first responders which is "Push forward till threat has ended."

Yes, parents have been called by students during incident but that generally makes situation worse as parents run to the school causing delays for first responders.
Sometimes its bike shedding, sure. Sometimes the actual implementation has flaws that weren't revealed in the early design. There's a reason we don't use waterfall and calling it an "early design review" doesn't make that better.
WSL2 graphics support was backported and supports Win10. I’m not sure about CUDA though
I do the same thing! How do you find people who want your product before you make it? It's hard to get people to know about it without showing them something first.

What if I don't have any distribution or social followings?

P.S. I'm in the same boat.
Any time I hear the word reasonable in a law, I throw up my hands. That word is not concrete. It's the "give up on life pants" of legalese. Respect yourself and others, if you can't define proper limits then you don't know what you want or how to get it. In which case you should leave everyone else in peace.
What's missing may tell you more that what is there.
Windows 'processor groups' aren't at all similar to linux NUMA aware scheduling, which is the proper method regardless,
There's 64 bits that represent all cores on the system, setting those bits defines how a process is assigned to a core. The 'processor groups' is a hack that keeps the same bitmask that they originally used.

Nowadays windows can and will schedule across processor groups as per
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/procthread/p...
> whether your comment intends to highlight rich+FAANG parents as better or worse at appropriately managing technology around their kids

Rich and FAANG parents tend to be better at restricting their kids’ phone and tablet use. Far from universal. But take this article—Greenwich is a rich town.
Labour Market Impact Assessment Map in Canada
Off leash running the halls and attacking kids though? Show the dog attacks in Greenwich schools if you want to be taken seriously.
Perhaps consider "attack" as broadly defined or metaphorical, similar to "cell phone == crack pipe", which of course isn't nonsense either, or is it.
Reminds me of this comic: https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/neoliberal
I think you have misread quote here. Emphasis is on taking responsibility here IMHO. Your proposal to “divide and conquer” is still estimation process.
Cognitive Science of Learning: Developing Automaticity