skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
We can't seem to understand each others.

I 100% trust my open source audited rm, but it will definitely remove everything from my system if I call it with parameters "-rf" and "/" with sufficient permission. It is powerful enough, and the whole set of trusty tools I have on my linux distro lets me take control of it remotely.

That tool is shady, I agree, but it also deactivated. Do you know what it means on Android for an app to be deactivated? It basically means "not installed". It's here in the file system (on the system partition), but doesn't run. It wouldn't concern me if I had it (though I would prefer it not to be there and for the system partition to be smaller so I can use this space in the user partition), I'm way more concerned by all the craps that actually runs.
Sounds like you might like D2. It is written in Golang and doesnt use Chrome to render.

Wrote an article about it: https://victorbjorklund.com/build-diagrams-as-code-with-d2-d...
3. The project started under a Harvard affiliated Github org during the course of PhDs. These same people later joined Google where it continued to be developed and over time adopted more and more in place of TensorFlow.
I’m looking to emulate the mating strategy of a preying mantis.

Please just eat me after we’re done doing the dirty.
That and the relatively high fee.
They are better for 45+, divorced people
It's a bit esoteric. Personally, I see "the deal" I have with God / the World-Spirit / whatever you wanna call it as, you let me have a family I'm happy with, I'm happy to work my hardest to make this world a richer and more bountiful place. You take that away from me, I reserve the right to live like I owe you nothing, because I don't.

Money and material goods have always meant little to me in and of themselves, so I'm glad to see my deal has been on acceptable terms so far.
Man is a beast by nature. Takes effort to be human.
That's already priced in the stock drop.
> super-human knowledge but the reasoning skills of maybe a young child

Super-human knowledge is certainly true (all of wikipedia in multiple languages at all times, quickly)

Consider however, an important distinction. A young child is really, exactly not the way to think of these machines and their outputs. The implicit connection there is that there is some human-like progress to more capability.. not so.

Also note that "chain of reasoning" around 2019 or so, was exactly the emergent behavior that convinced many scientists that there was more going on that just a "stochastic response" machine. Some leading LLMs do have the ability to solve multi-step puzzles, against the expectations of many.

My "gut feeling" is that human intelligence is multi-layered and not understood; very flexible and connected in unexpected ways to others and the living world. These machines are not human brains at all. General Artificial Intelligence is not defined, and many have reasons to spin the topic in public media. Let's use good science skills while forming public opinion on these powerful and highly-hyped machines.
I can personally say, I am not super concerned about it being killed. Google supported TF1 for quite a long time and all these projects have a shelf life.

What concerned me about JAX, at a small company, is that it doesn't benefit from the network effects of almost everyone developing for it. E.g. There is no Llama 3.1 implementation in JAX afaict.

So as long as there is a need to pull from the rest of the world the ecosystem will trump the framework.

Activity in the LLM space is slowing down though, so there is an opportunity to take the small set of what worked and port it to JAX and show people how good that world is.
My credit card was expired and I just couldn't to have been bothered to update my payment details.
Contempt for the Glue People (2021)
The third space.
I've sometimes wondered if dating apps are best served through some kind of nonprofit decentralized format, maybe something grassroots, or through the government or something, precisely because of the issues you raise. I admit that might sound a little loony but dating or pairing is a fundamental human activity, and it doesn't seem too farfetched to me to think that people might build out something outside of a profit model. Also, some countries are starting to openly discuss declining birth rates, with government actively encouraging mating, so I could see something like that being developed in certain settings.

I also have a hunch, though, that some of what makes relationships click is hard to formalize in an app focused on dating per se. In person chemistry, development of an initial relationship without an explicit shared dating goal, and so forth. Sometimes I wonder if it would be better to just incorporate dating options and features into a more general purpose social app.
This is probably when installing an APK of an app that is available on the play store, being the same app id play store will pick it up.

The main use case for doing this is probably revanced, especially for patches like reddit that don't change the app id.
Line must go up
I'm not sure what you mean. The PyScript website?
For 99% of these apps, the presence of women is what keeps the app alive, since men are the ones typically pursuing women in dating.

Men's experience is relevant to them, but not the owners of the app.
the idea was the original Apple II was made in 1977 as a game machine (Woz wanted to play breakout in software) but there really wasn't much of a concept of what a "Game Machine" was back then, it was mostly a huge hack trying to get minimal chipcount

years later when the c64 and IBM PC came out, the IIe was released which did have vblank support, but Apple II devs were reluctant to break backwards compatability.

You can still do a lot of cool games w/o vblank support. I'd say it'd barely makes the top 5 list of most annoying things about programming games on the Apple II.

And all these other "better" platforms, tell me do they have a port of Riven?
http://deater.net/weave/vmwprod/riven/
I remember having used, a very long time ago, a self-hosted search engine on my library of PDFs, and it was unbelievably useful.

I dream about a similar thing that can do OCR on scanned docs and extract text from my also sprawling library of epub and mobi files. If someone builds something like this, with maybe a LOCAL LLM to extract text descriptions from photos and movies as well as indexing metadata for everything, subtitles from movies and lyrics for songs, and add that to a NAS appliance, it’d be a killer.
Resurrecting the Scents of Ancient Cyprus
Off topic pretty much: my then 13-year-old daughter told me (divorced x 4 years at the time) not to use online dating sites as they were for losers and weirdos. That was in 1996.

In 2008, in her final year of law school at Duquesne University in Pittsburgh, she met a guy on JDate whom she subsequently married in 2012; they just celebrated their 12th wedding anniversary.

Here's the thing: he lived three blocks from her; at the time he was an associate at law firm Jones Day, working 90 hours/week; no way would the two of them ever have met absent the internet.
Florida is building the largest environmental restoration project
I'm not understanding this. If I use the "Tor Browser Bundle" and never use that browser for anything but Tor, and never log in to anything on that browser, how can they track me?
Alien Civilizations Might Be Too Advanced for Us to Detect
Imaginary Universities in Canada, are a government supported racket. It is not for no reason that the UN condemns Canada for modern slavery with their temporary foreign worker program, that runs off the back of fleece-u colleges.

There's more intelligence in this AI guide, than there is in the majority of college diploma's coming out of of Canada today.
Hey, I hope this helps you reach your goal. You are doubtless a wonderful person either way. This is the most creative self help, I've ever seen.
Also because there's no incentive to lie.
For what kind of use do you think GPLv2 would be a blocker?
That's in quotes as further draw attention to things not mattering, to say you should put that above things.
That sounds very competitive. One, more question.

I used to use VB6 partly just for quickly drawing GUI’s, esp getting size right. Lazarus was one of free tools I found that was similar but most prefer other languages.

Is there a way to make a GUI in Lazarus, save it to a file with types/dimensions, and then some other tool could generate a non-Pascal GUI from it? Does it have an export ability that’s detailed and parsable enough for that?
FYI, that does nothing: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27545206
As someone running neo4j in production I can just warn that the DBs are a pain and need a lot more care and love than Postgres or Oracle DBs. Even much larger instances. Maybe their cloud offerings are better, but they are quite expensive.
Maybe this: https://github.com/Tyrrrz/DiscordChatExporter
Can you post a link to the study?
This seems to encourage conflation of the interviewer and their personality with the company culture. I have been an open, collaborative person in a cagey, secretive company. Thinking that place was similar would be an error.
It has never made sense to me why someone uses no, and then proceed to little by little to make their implementation into having relations.

It’s way less work just to learn sql or an orm.

Nosql is great at being a document store.

I’ve used MySQL longer, it’s been a good default option, the jump to how Postgres works and what it offers is too much to ignore.

Postgres can act as a queue, many of the functions that a nosql has, handle being ann embedding db, and do so until a decent volume. It can be the backbone of many low code tools like supabase, hasura, etc. the only thing that’s different is there seems to be nice currents for MySQL but you get the hang of it pretty quick.
Is that sarcasm? You forgot the /s.
This is the wrong way to think about it. The optimization problem happens before a second person is directly involved at all.

The operator simply encourages behaviors which people _feel_ moves them closer to meeting someone but which are relatively time-inefficient. So the user has to spend much more time on the app, which increases all the relevant metrics of engagement and profit.

To fix the problem, one would expect an app which either charges a lifetime fee upfront or upon delivery.

Since it is hard to collect payment on delivery, the best case to eliminate the principal-agent problem would be a $2,499 one time fee for unlimited lifetime service.
I think it’s much simpler: must relationships don’t end in forever monogamy. There’s like a 90% chance someone who leaves the dating pool will re-enter it eventually.

They don’t really need any algorithmic matching magic.

Also, the pool of people online dating is going to be somewhat (perhaps heavily) sample biased. People who are likely to form long term relationships will, over time, leave the dating pool at a higher rate than those who aren’t. By the time you hit age 35, you find the dating pool to be mostly people who haven’t permanently paired off for very obvious reasons (myself included, btw).

So overall, I just don’t think they worry at all about people leaving the dating pool.

I do think their incentive structure is broken and that plus the fact that they are all owned by two companies (and even one of them, Bumble, doesn’t just buy up all the competition) does prevent them from making the metric about user satisfaction though. I just don’t think it’s broken for this reason.
Indeed, these kind of apps make dating so … official and formalized. You need a profile, you need to answer questions (which implies knowing what you’re actually looking for), you need to fit into the options offered by the app (which vary depending on religion and politics in your area) and then “the algorithm” trying to match you based on engagement. It’s just not an enjoyable process.

Of course, just a list of profiles may not be helpful either e.g. I met my husband on Grindr but that required a lot of effort and enduring the emotional downsides of the experience. Dating online also deprives one of using all of one’s senses to “feel” if the person(s) in front are a good match.

PS: For some of us, online dating is not always a choice as you can imagine, so even with the downsides, these apps are needed still.
Show HN: Tying feature flags with observability using OpenFeature
And in the case of Bumble where the initiators are only women?
If we don’t think about it now we’ll really have to think about it way more later.
Try a girth hitch at the master point
I do it like this:

Title Year Author Name.pdf

Same benefits as you mentioned. You can also filter by time that way.
Germany in a nutshell.
GrafX2: http://grafx2.chez.com
levels.fyi contains salary information for comparison.

Take a Google L4 - $280K US, $190K UK, $160K DE.

But when you include the regulatory protections and benefits, the differences in living standards, etc. the US salary is probably still higher but these salaries are certainly nothing to balk at.
But it can't be a thought experiment about humans since humans would not tolerate the outcome in the first place. Humans are moral animals who are compelled to act on their morality. One aspect of morality is fairness. Another is compassion. See Johnathon Haidt's work on this.

As soon as you realize that Omelia could not obtain if it involved humans, it becomes a lot less interesting.
This is the greatest thing i've ever watched. thank you
Yet another reason to purge cookies often :)

Everytime I log into a site that I want to buy something from, I always clear cache, cookies, logins before and after using that site.

Yes it can be a PITA, but I think that stops other sites from looking to see what WEB sites you really care about.
Show HN: I made a free story&novel maker to help create novel faster
It's a very hard market to get into these days when you don't already have millions of users. The problem is, if someone signs up for your app and there are only a few other people using the app in the same area, it's not very useful and they'll quickly uninstall it. So how do you launch a new dating app that already has millions of users? You need to have an existing app/service which already has millions of users that can segue into a dating app. Such as when Facebook launched their dating feature...
Don't turn this into a general rule:

Payer Patrick pays molester Maverick to maim or intimidate victim Victor.

Is Victor allowed to complain? Or only the person who paid?
Isn't the whole message of this article that younger generations are seeking interactions that those events can provide? Also what city do you refer to?
That's a choice the company makes in most states, though, meaning they can just as easily choose not to as choose unlimited vacation.
Quantum mechanics and consciousness are both weird and therefore are equivalent
The Android app StreetComplete is an excellent start for updating OSM I found. There soon become occasions when you have to bring out the big guns and edit it using the web editor at https://www.openstreetmap.org/ , which is possible to do on a mobile phone if it has a big enough screen, but much easier on a laptop.
On a small level computers do that: cpu cache (itself 3 levels), GPU memory (optional), main memory, hdd cache.

The reason why animal brains would store multiple copies of a memory is functional proximity. You need memory near the limbic system for neurotic processing and fear conditioning. Long term storage is near the brain stem so that it can eventually bleed into the cerebellum to become muscle memory. There is memory storage near the frontal lobes so that people can reason about with their advanced processors like speech parsing, visual cortex, decision bias, and so forth.
Seems like the solution is to make that approval process independent. (As for who would pay for that, who can say, should it be government run?, should it have application fees? etc)

While I sympathise with developers who are the victim of mistakes, we have no transparency to know who is actually in the wrong.

There is also constant subjective criticism about what is too little or too much protective oversight. Fortnite was approved by both Apple and Google despite the FTC fining Epic for intentionally tricking children into making unwanted purchases, (Epic would also kill the account if the parent did charge backs), other scam apps have snuck onto the various stores over the years, and it wasn't too long ago that both Facebook and Google used side-loading to distribute data collection apps that wouldn't pass official channels.
>it’s scientifically proven that there’s no correlation between such questionnaire matches and actual relationship compatibility

Citation?
It's exactly how it works. If some behaviour is anti-competitive, it is the role of the government to correct it.

> In this case I'm not sure why Google would pull Organic Maps.

Exactly. Someone competent should decide whether that is an anti-competitive move or not. Noting that a "mistake" may be anti-competitive and may deserve a fine.

That someone is a government.
On the contrary, it's exceedingly easy. The vibes are all off.
As I understand it, that capitalism generally implies that "white" is not being used specifically to mean something like "the name of a group of a specific group of people from a given region/culture", instead it is being used to mean the default American culture that provides the frame of reference against which our society tends to measure other cultures. So for example, "Black" would be capitalized because it is a specific group separate from the default of "white" while "Anglo Saxon" would be capitalized because it is a specific subgroup within "white".

This probably isn't a perfect analogy, but it might be somewhat similar to not capitalizing "earth science" but capitalizing "Lunar Science". It's assumed that if you don't specify then the default is that the science you are talking about is on Earth.
Which country was that (as it doesn't feel real)? Due to power imbalance the employee is virtually never obliged to pay anything aside cases of disciplinary actions/malpractice.
Women are optimizing 80% of men out of the gene pool.

What the men do is irrelevant.
They changed it recently to reduce the burden - I’m not kidding
> I don’t date based on politics

That’s weird because at least in the US and UK people definitely do date based on this and it makes sense.

If you are mildly politically literate, then in those two countries, you know there’s really two realistic parties you can pick who are opposed from each other.

Given then it’s pretty strange to want to be with someone who is diametrically opposed to making your country better, and actively voting to make the country worse, regardless of your POV either way.
What Makes Computer Generated Images Look Real? Exploring Ray Tracing and CGI [video]
> also who the heck needs open and close times?

Uh I do?

Not all restaurants are open for both lunch and dinners, and in every country there's different ideas on what's the appropriate time for having a meal.
I’m not aware of any sandbox escape attack for the Tor browser, but I am no expert. If there is one, even limited, it’d probably be enough to figure out a way to track you down.
Ofc I reserve the right to be wrong, just wanted to share my subjective experience, that there can be tradeoffs and there probably aren't any silver bullets.

For the most part, I think that you should put any mass/batch processing in the DB (just comment/version/test/deploy your code like you would on the back end, as best as you can with the tools available to you) and don't sweat too much about handling the CRUD operations in your back end, through whatever ORM you use or don't use (regular queries are also fine, as long as parametrized to prevent injection).

For complex schemas, a nice approach I've found is making one DB view per table/list/section of your front end, so you only need 1 DB call to load a particular component, otherwise the N+1 risk gets far greater ("Oh hey, I got this list of orders, but each other needs a delivery status, so I'll just iterate over those and fetch them for each item, whoops, the DB is spammed with requests.").

Good luck!
Golden layout's unfortunately somewhat abandoned.

I like the look of https://github.com/mathuo/dockview
However the swipe from the women’s side selects for at least some kind of compatibility.

Also my wife is from Tinder.
>> Indeed, these loud cracking sounds are often attributed to large pressure splits in tree trunks, caused by sap freezing and expanding inside the tree’s interior. But while freezing sap in trees has been found to produce sounds at ultrasonic frequencies, outside of the range of human hearing, scientists have found no evidence this phenomenon might make sounds that are audible to the human ear.

Personally, i have not just heard them but have seen it happen. At -40 and below, in certain evergreen forrests not used to such temperatures, a tree can randomly "explode". An internal crack shakes the tree, throwing snow everywhere. It lookes and sounds like an explosion. You hear gunshot and then see the tree shake off all its snow. The tree stands out as the one dark with branches no longer held down by snow. It is like an angry ent waking up about to eat a passing human.

https://youtube.com/shorts/oG-N2LCYEc4

Does anyone really believe that a crack like that wouldnt make a gunshot sound?

Here is the sound, after about 0:30. Not much snow to shake off but you can see them moving.

https://youtu.be/Rz3TqqNkEBU?feature=shared
Yes, I absolutely do, thanks.
Intrigued by the project, love the idea of exhaustively exploring significance for arbitrary input.

Think you need to provide a few example inputs and outputs on the github for the program.

Also not sure a project focused on decoding meaning and signals benefits from having AI generated interpretations divorced from the inherently human act of sign interpretation. Can be seen in the md file, such a rigidly enforced structured output has forced it to give some averaged amount of weight to different categories and examples, when many are facets of each-other, or purely just expressions of something mentioned earlier. I can see free-form high-temperature llm outputs fed to another model, which serves only to aggregate their core interpretations, providing more insight than what's within the document currently.
nervous laughter
Zngur does allow you to execute arbitrary C++ from Rust.

Unfortunately it chooses to just assume your C++ is sound, it does explicitly warn you that you're signing up for this, but realistically this just doubles down on the known bad assumption in C++ that programmers are infallible.

Rather than (like Rust's native C FFI) marking the arbitrary C++ as unsafe, Zngur chooses to have you explicitly opt in if you want your code marked unsafe. We know from years of practical experience that C++ programmers rely heavily on unstated assumptions for the correctness of code, a practice which does not scale. A very large proportion of the C++ stdlib itself has a narrow contract, yet few practitioners memorise these contracts and they're unchecked - disaster looms.
Evernote will do this, you can feed it a bunch of PDFs and other documents, it will OCR them and make them all searchable. it's not perfect, but you can also add manual tags for things you know are important.
I mean gaps of white space that are part of the design and could possibly host content for different app states (not uniformly distributed between flex items).
Smalltalk got a lot right very early on that got adopted in bits by everyone eventually. The idea of a fully interactive IDE, designing systems as distributed objects that exchange messages, and so on.

Unfortunately parceling it out and fudging it killed a great concept and we got stuck with corporate driven "OOP" that lives on in Java, Kubernetes, etc.

It's a wonder the people at PARC divined so much of great conceptual designs and other companies got to profit from bungled versions thereof.