skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's easier in space because of no air resistance, but stuff like mylar balloon/sheath decoys I think beats out basically all missile defense. Aside from the infrared stuff, inflatable ships not in port wouldn't leave an actual wake of the right size etc. and might not be viable.
This article is from one of the richest towns in America.
> Of course they don't, how could they? How could anything, for that matter?

Uh, that's literally what unit tests do? They tell you if you broke any of the cases they test for, before you release your implementation to other people...
Well TFA explains one.

I also find it difficult to conceive of a case where adding noexcept would lead to slower/longer code, other than arbitrary noexcept overloads such as TFA.
This is unfortunately not always true, even with a table-based unwinder. In order to detect the noexcept frame and call terminate(), the unwinder must be able to see the stack frame that has noexcept. This means that the compiler must suppress tail call optimization when a noexcept function tail calls a non-noexcept function.
A history of other time traveling debugging papers and products (including this one):

https://jakob.engbloms.se/archives/1554

https://jakob.engbloms.se/archives/1564
I think he simply doesn’t care as that area of the world is far from his top 10 list of concerns, but he does always seem to be interested in Europe and the Americas
I come from former communist country and you are absolutely right - everybody had to work, both men and women, not having a job was a straight ticket to long and nasty jail. Of course that's artificial, so lower classes had absolutely meaningless jobs just to tick checkboxes.

Central planning, collective ownership (meaning nobody felt the need to actually manage those assets since they were owned just by state) was a disaster in every single effin' country it implemented. Literally everybody was stealing stuff somehow.

When I look at my ancestors, women worked darn hard. Giving birth directly on the field in the middle of work and resuming said work right after was considered normal. Those were not some rosy times some folks desperately wanting to own properties right here right now like to paint as.
A survey of approaches to securing BGP and inter-domain routing
>The short term contract can be renewed or replaced with a full time contract.

As someone in games, this is exactly the road to getting exploited. "If I work harder and really wow them with this feature, I could get full time work!" meanwhile, there were plans to not renew anyone at the end of the project and to lay off full time workers. But you get a convinient carrot to lure starry-eyed devs with

Your "as long as the company is a good employer" is doing Atlas levels of lifing here.
This site is visited by very many FAANG employees.
The ICE then promptly dumps 60-70% of the gasoline's potential energy into the environment in the form of heat and emissions, and EVs can also capture energy that would otherwise be dumped as heat from the ICE car's brake rotors. So in terms of useful work extracted from that energy, that battery holds the rough equivalent to 8-10 gallons of gasoline, of course at the cost of weight, space, degradation, refueling time, etc.
Yes, though you do have to enable that. For me I tend to have it buffer the video. That way I can even seek backwards of web streams.
Can’t sell it, have to hold it, storage isn’t free, so effectively if it isn’t evidence, they can’t keep it.

I wonder if you are owed interest on cash held for an extended period of time.
The 90s SGI machines were great, for graphics, but it is mystifying how many people used them as standard workstations given things like Suns had better CPUs. Toy Story was designed on SGIs and rendered on Suns for a reason after all.

The great oddity of SGIs was the multimedia peripherals worked properly, and this is the bit of the experience the NT and Linux replacements never quite managed.
Assertions triggering in integration tests are different from unit tests. They don't involve writing mocks. They are generally closer to the code, especially with design by contract, so they are more likely to be fixed during a refactor. They encode what you believe your code should do more directly. And they can be used as a basis for formal verification.
oh sorry for the confusion! I do think we need both git ignores, but to be used appropriately.

System global .gitignore solves a problem specific to that developer

Repo .gitignore solves a problem for the project (and every developer)
> The nature of work was also dramatically different in the past with the overwhelming majority of people being independently employed, or working at extremely small local businesses. Said businesses would also generally double as the store owner's house

So here’s my question: Would a woman helping out in her husband’s shop/restaurant/farm/etc even count as a job in terms of labor force participation?

Personally I’d consider that a job but I have a feeling it doesn’t show up in stats because it’s an unpaid position and just considered the default expectation in a family business. Especially back then.
Don't worry, now they'll say this is in a 3rd world country and it can't happen where they live. Think of the children!

On the other hand, it may be just incompetence somewhere, as another thread here says.
Tests have the same effect right?
Do you mind sharing that list of plugins you use? I have never used plugins with vim/neovim and only used them vanilla up to this point but interested in checking out the plugin ecosystem.
That and the robots on twitter are Legion and they are paying well with all those verified accounts, no way he is going to endanger those. So he would lose his bot money AND be on the line for more staff to update algorithms to handle the vitriol on twitter; thus it’s a no-brainer to leave Brazil until the government lightens up or a new regime comes into play
What city is this in? What's the pay rate? What does a bedroom go for on Craigslist in the area?
Agreed, and this is actually a really good point:

> we don't implement a feature unless it works for the general cas

I used to make that mistake a lot. My boss would say "can we do this", for example report memory usage per operation. And I would say "no because sometimes memory is shared between operations so it would be meaningless". In other words I couldn't do it perfectly so I said we couldn't do it at all.

That's what the VLC guy is doing and I didn't realise until I worked with that boss that it is COMPLETELY WRONG!

Just because you can't do it perfectly doesn't mean giving up entirely is the best you can do. In cases like this you can absolutely do something that works sometimes but not in every case and that is way better for users than just giving up.

Lots of programmers fall into that trap though.
Do you know what else is all of that? Writing the five lines of code by hand. Or just letting a LLM generate it. This and everything else I want to reply has already been covered in the article.
Then it must be really efficient amount of data since we only get like 7 dreams a night
That makes sense in a very X kind of way.
As predicted you decided that since it matters, not having a reference is "invalid". But it wasn't invalid, like I said, maybe you don't have a reference. Only maybe. Either way is valid in this system. The user needs to care which is which.

In the languages you prefer (such as C), we can't distinguish this case from the case where we should always have a reference and not having one is a bug, they look the same, the machine can't help us get this right and hopefully the user carefully consults our documentation "NB this value may be NULL". Ugh.

Go is a wonderful example of a language that's grossly unsuited to this problem. Instead of "Make invalid states unrepresentable" Go chooses "Make representable states valid". Don't want a default for this type? Too bad, Go insists zero is valid and that's always your default, feel free to name this "DoNotUse_GoIsAWful" if you like, in a large system it'll get used anyway.
Why does my brain have to simulate so much of weird and stressful bullshit adventures which can never happen IRL? If it mostly is concerned about how to move the limbs then why I never remember actually using my body to do anything in a dream except the sensation I invoke to fly? To me it feels like my dreaming brain is mostly simulating emotional experiences.
> I would argue the problem is how dependencies in general are added to projects

But you need the functionality anyway, so there are two dependencies: on your own code, or on someone else's code. But you can't avoid a dependency, and it comes at a cost.

If you don't know how to code the functionality, or it will take too much time, a library is an outcome. But if you need leftPad or isNumber as an external dependency, that's so far in the other direction, it's practically a sign of incompentence.
The entire fleet qualified for McMurdo seems to be six planes and three helicopters, if I'm reading this right.

https://www.usap.gov/sciencesupport/scienceplanningsummaries...

I would guess it to be pretty rare that multiple aircraft would be on approach at once, and if so, I'd imagine one could hold at a distance to allow approaches to be serialized.
One way that a time cap or caps could be set is by legislation, as you mention; but judges don't write legislation. There is a way the rules develop as "common law" -- via judicial decisions -- but frequently that involves a process of gradual firming up through several cases that cover different situations. For example:

- There would be cases where a person's medications were confiscated; the courts would probably find that these need to be returned within a few days.

- There would be cases where a person's groceries were confiscated along with their car; perhaps the courts would find that the groceries don't have to be returned at all but rather their value replaced (it is hard to set a consistent timeline for groceries since crackers are good for weeks but ice cream in a car is good for maybe a few hours) whereas the car must be returned within a few weeks.

- And so on.

It generally isn't up to a court, faced with a specific case, to come up with a rule that covers a wide variety of dissimilar, if related, situations. Information for those situations is not generally covered in the case before them so it would be hard for them to make a good decision. They also aren't tasked to go get that information, since their job is to decide a particular as in an expeditious manner.
Wouldn’t the OS vendor just block the installation of certain apps? Say, UK says that Samsung and Apple should block certain encrypted messaging apps. Regardless if it’s from App Store or not.
I’m actually in the opposite camp, I had left VSCode for Zed about 6 months ago and used it exclusively at work/personal projects. I’ve customized it extensively, and loved its approach to Vim integration. But in the last two weeks I’ve made the switch to Neovim (using a customized LazyVim [0] setup). I really like Zed but as others have pointed out they are not prioritizing features around REPL’s, AI, and collaboration while many core features are lacking. Vim Cut/Copy and paste being bugged, and html tags not closing drove me crazy over time.

I think Zed is wonderful, and would perhaps go back to it after it matures a bit. For what’s its worth the friction going from Zed -> Neo vim was quite seamless, and I’d expect going the other way would as well.

0: http://www.lazyvim.org/
This is about McMurdo. I'd be surprised if they ever had multiple flights landing at once.
There have been a higher than average postings of off topic (not all unwelcome by any means) news posts. And by all accounts readers are split on their presence. Here's an approach worth pursuing at least once in your adult life for longer than your 2 week holiday/vacation.
Because the hardware isn't so relevant. You have exactly two gatekeepers.
I agree. This is a very cool idea, but the landing page is a bit of a mess. It’s reiterating the same thing multiple times in different ways, which is confusing and unnecessary. I assume the author did this to fill space. It’s also broken on mobile. I would suggest:

1: Header with statement as you have it (Share your problems…)

2: Explore, interact section as you have it

3: Three to five of the most recently posted problems

4: Call to action (sign up)

So you have what it is, how it works, an example, sign up.

Also, are you monetizing this? If not, why require a sign up at all to view problems? Why is the only option to sign up/login with a Google account?
I can commit to your design, but if I think it is bad design damm sure I should be allowed to call it bad design. Both before and after the fact. If you create a system where my prior disagreement will be punished, I may choose not to say it prior, but that does not mean I can not speak about it later.

If I find out the design is bad in the middle of implementing it or after I see how to nice sounding words were implemented in practice, again, I should have right to say so.

All of these rules are just attempts to make yourself look better by preventing criticism.
100k … I hear and use all of these high token context LLMs, but often they fail to include all information that should be in their context.

Does your approach work for you?
Global Anti-Corruption Consortium
Your logic only works if manufacturing of solar panels is an energy intensive tasks, which it isn't. The total energy expenditure of manufacturing, shipping and installing solar panels is recouped after operating the solar panel for roughly a year.

Solar panels are now cheaper than coal because you need to dig up coal and bring it to the power plant, which costs more than the 4cents per kwh which LCOE solar now costs.
Hey, I'm arguing in favour of contracts and assertions here... XD

I even considered formal verification, if under another name.

Ed.

I think I hit a posting limit. After reading dataflow's answer to gp I think I interpreted ggp differently from both of you.

I meant quite literally neither assertions nor unit tests prevent you from breaking things. Of course they'll help you to catch those mistakes before release. I didn't think that counts as prevention.
We're talking past each other. You're talking about retaining people already hired or simply rehiring people.

I'm talking about the ability to get a job in the first place. Employers are spoiled for choice since 2008, and their requirements genuinely are hard unless you happen to know someone. Your experience in tech is an outlier. Your experience outside of tech in your state and your city is vastly different from my state and my city.
> start over each day
This reminds me of "spaced repetition" in learning theory. Drilling the same problem from scratch is a great way to get better at iterating through your rolodex of mental models, but so many people prioritize breadth because they think it is the only way to generalize to new problems.
Google could fire 50% of its staff and still make multiple 100B+ revenues from search ads and cloud.

They have a great business that prints money.

The problem Google has is making more money printing business lines - like Microsoft.

I do hope Google turns around and gets back to its roots.
I think people forget that initially the lab leak was being pushed -hard- by the far right with zero evidence other than speculation and rather than stir up the masses lots of new orgs abstained from it with no clear evidence. After more data came out and more analysis then it became much more credible theory with experts having looked over it rather than the bot armies on twitter/Facebook/etc.
But fossil fuels have the externalities of destroying our planet.
> How do you deal with (for example) a constructor that fails?

The usual alternative is to have a factory function that returns std::optional<T> or std::expected<T, Err>. This avoids two-stage init, but has other tradeoffs.
> It sort of raises the question of, could there be 1 universal language to query relational databases...

Even if SQL and/or another query language could be Turing-complete, that doesn't mean that you can have 1 universal language to perform all possible queries in an efficient way. In basic computer science terms that means that your data structure is linked with the queries, and efficiency you want to achieve, and ad-hoc changes should be created for specific problems.
I love the smell of freshly cut astroturf
But sorting all the paragraphs in alphabetical order increased reader engagement metrics! How would I ever have discovered readers wanted that without A/B testing?
I didn’t mean to imply that there is a conservation of wealth. I meant that there is no exchange with participants outside of the population of Earth; and at any given time, if you want people to be able to spend x, they must also be able to earn x. And if you have an economy that works with a population of n, then in principle the same should be possible with a population of (say) 2n, because you can just imagine having the first one twice independently side-by-side. The only hard limit is when you exceed Earth’s resources, hence overpopulation. But we’re not there yet, and according to projections we also won’t reach it this century. The reason for our present difficulties is not that there are too many people.
This over couples the model to the request flow. The prompt format should be a property of the model. The use of decorators is cute but distracting and at the wrong binding time.

How will this framework handle tuning the prompts in a task specific way?
"High-freedom": https://www.yahoo.com/news/germany-offer-police-extra-search...
Use conan or vcpkg.
>Picture was a requirement, but that is slowly becoming less popular. Especially in Tech.

it's barely even necessary in this day and age. Just search up John Doe, Job Title, citysville, State and odds are you'll find some LinkedIn (they probably applied that way anyway). If not, a twitter or open Facebook or more. lot of the newer generations happily give out such private info.
I used to go to a board game players meetup at Pappy's and now it's a car wash so I dun want that happening to our Blockbuster next.
I 100% agree with the other comment: Abseil and Folly are both broken monstrosities by design... the build system garbage is just one reason almost nobody uses them outside facebook and google.

The chaining hashtable in liburcu is truly lock free, based on a real build system, and in my experience outperforms everything facebook and google have ever published: https://github.com/urcu/userspace-rcu
No. In a teams and companies where it is safe to disagree, people disagree openly. If they are not, it is because management or you are punishing dissent. If that is the case, the solution is to stop punishing that dissent.

Second, you can not use theoretical option of formal review as a way to avoid responsibility. Just because you sent your 150 long pages pdf to people to read and they actually read it in allocated 2 hours they could afford for it and did not seen issues does not mean you dont have responsibility.

This is case of you wanting reward if it goes well, but also wanting to hide behind review if it goes bad.
One of the reasons I don’t like android is because every time I get new phone I go into settings and disable as much as I can on individual app basis.
A sapiens brain does more than “intelligence”.

Conversely, sapiens intelligence is not the only expression of intelligence and almost certainly not the apex of intelligence.
The case against work life balance (Shyam Sankar)
I remember adding a random date picker that pulled in a copy of React with it to a non-React project. NPM is a dumpster fire at a nuclear facility.
Thought experiment: if a LLM can correctly produce the code for a micro-library like, say, leftpad... Should you call leftpad as a dependency or should you have the LLM generate that leftpad function for you?

And if the LLM ain't good enough to write leftpad, how can I trust it to write anything at all?
Sure, but assuming users can see the problems as well, it’s a level playing field. On the other hand, if he’s manually choosing which ones go public before anyone can see them, that’s possibly not so great.
They are legitimate concerns. The 30% fees on the gross amount to more than half of the profits going to platform holders even after subtracting their payment processing and bandwidth expenses. And then they charge you for marketing within the store on top of those fees, driving it way above 50% of net profits on titles that want to be seen (organic visibility based is intentionally undermined by the in-store ads system).
Escape velocity varies with distance from the center of mass. Is the distance in that paper comparable to the distance of the discovered object?
Or the silicon chips inside could just turn off whenever they see the word 'telegram' anywhere in memory...
The UNIX philosophy is also build on the idea of small programs, just like micro-libraries, of doing one thing and one thing well, and composing those things to make larger things.

This year I started learning FORTH, and it's very much this philosophy. To build a building, you don't start with a three-story slab of marble. You start with a hundreds of perfect little bricks, and fit them together.

If you come from a technical ecosystem outside the Unix paradigm, it can be hard to grasp.
The only countries that have achieved economies of scale in nuclear reactor design/build after the 1980s have been France and China. [0]

Other countries built one reactor here or there, while continually shifting regulations and/or political support, and then were surprised it was shockingly expensive.

[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_power_statio... (sort by Began Operation date)
Nothing wrong with that either, like I said copy paste works too. A lot of minimalistic programs will just copy in another project.

Forking the code and using that is arguably nicer though IMO, makes it easier pull in new updates from the code, and to be able to track changes and bug fixes easier. I've tried both and find this approach nicer overall.
Automatically create a kamal-ready VPS using Terraform and Hetzner
when given 2 choices, people always forget the 3rd default choice of doing nothing. Despite many philosophies, "Doing Nothing" in a legal sense cannot be taken as a Yes or No. Maybe they simply never saw the message in time (especially something as time sensitive as 24 hours).
if you want a fast hash map, just use a library that is built specifically around a particular implementation strategy.

std unordered map is slow by design for several reasons.

Things of interest are:

- open addressing method: linear, quadratic, robinhood, hybrid

- the default hash function

- the logic for the number of buckets (power of two, prime) and associated hash projection (fibonacci, modulo).

Boost seems to be doing a decent job at this now.
Not true, I have refused a “look over”of my car for two traffic stops, both cops threatened canine cops and I told them go ahead. One radioed in “not available”, The other one went back to his car and wrote me a ticket and told me I was lucky he got another call while he was filling out the ticket. I’m sure they sometimes do “do it anyway” but it isn’t a sure thing.
Wouldn't it still be an unnecessary distraction for the student?
TL;DR most micro libraries should be gists
Propagandists would create fake twitter accounts and then quote them, but nobody reads that.
For things like getting into the game, look at windows defender CPU usage during startup...

At least most stuff puts everything in a single .pak file and uses sqlite databases to avoid most of the windows filesystem overheads I guess.
Two tiny bits of feedback:

- Don't link directly to an account's avatar image. None of them load for me, because of cross-domain blocking (macOS, Firefox)

- Make the tables sortable by clicking on table headers