skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The shop owners also put their hours onto Google Maps, or paid somebody to do it. You shouldn't labour for free for Google either.

Even if you managed to help a shop get hundreds or thousands of new customers by updating their online information, they wouldn't even give you a cup of coffee if you asked. More likely they'd spit in your face.

For most physical businesses that are open to the public, correct information on map services are by far their most important advertising. Yet, they neglect this and spend thousands on billboards, social media, radio spots, etc. If they are failing as business owners, that's their own problem.
Garbage article

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adk0997

The paper is about how the brain seems to encode memories and re encode them over multiple groups of differently aged neurons; with younger neurons being more plastic). Nothing like saying “brains store three copies”
OP wrote "dating" but you replied with "mating." Why?
The Onion Thinks Print Is the Future of Media
Given it had write access to its implementation, "unexpected" here reads more like "inevitable" than the witchcraft the article wishes to imply.
You can always run the AI in a separate test harness to see changes more quickly. This is what they were doing throughout development. What they weren’t doing was putting everything back together to see if the game still worked or made any sense (until the very end).

If you don’t want to check in broken AI code then don’t; that’s what branches are for. But the fact that they weren’t maintaining a working master is inexcusable.
https://archive.ph/7KDar
I think this is untapped potential of peer to peer networking, where your (subscribed) social circles reflect discoverability of content. Funding for maintenance and development should be seen as operational costs of the network, not as a startup exit strategy.
It wasn't a court case so they're were no judges, per se. The WRC is a state agency who presides over industrial relations.
That's an incredible leap.

The commission is pushing US companies to avoid breaking employment law in Ireland. Companies that believe the law is unfairly attacked against them or who were planning on ignoring the law might be deterred from opening up shop in Ireland, but how many companies does that describe?
You highlight a function of OSM that is hard to get across to people: I can fix the map!

For example, bicycle routing in my area was unreliable, because it would try to route me over rough trails. Just adding a few tags improved the experience dramatically. And then it was fixed not only for me, but everybody else too.

Meanwhile, other people fixed other annoyances, and the map works better across many areas. Google instead decides to hide things that interest me, and shows sponsored places I don't care for. I have zero recourse.
> my shopping in Lidl or a Macbook are largely the same as what I would pay in Germany

The difference probably the Germans don't go buy at cheap stores like lidl. The easy way to do PPP is to go by how much people pay and not how cheap you can get something for, which gets you a much less accurate picture of how much it actually costs to live there.
"polar bear stuck on an iceberg" mating strategy
Python, in a research environment. They did not bother restricting what the AI can do, and let it read and modify its own code in plaintext. Not really that surprising.

Not sure why this kind of "we are aiming for AGI" code is written in Python. I don't get it.
This is exactly why I gravitated to it so quickly. The first time I looked at pytorch code it was immediately obvious what the abstractions meant and how to use them to write a model architecture.

Jax looks like something completely different to me. Maybe I’m dumb and probably not the target audience, but it occurs to me that very few people are. When I read about using Jax, I find recommendations for a handful of other libraries that make it more useable. Which of those I choose to learn is not entirely obvious because they all seem to create a very fragmented ecosystem with code that isn’t portable.

I’m still not sure why I’d spend my time learning Jax, especially when it seems like most of the complaints from the author don’t really separate out training and inference, which don’t necessarily need to occur from the same framework.
Unlimited vacation was actually pioneered in the U.S., and spread from there. Most famously popularized by Netflix in its early days, but popular in law firms before that.

https://www.reddit.com/r/ExperiencedDevs/comments/nq2ph2/i_r...
Sorry, I was being flippant. The author, of course, could be an old school plagiarist.
Please explain, what do you mean by burden? To avoid me jumping to conclusions. You mean the heteronormative "burden" of the man shooting the first shot?
I met my ex on Bumble; we were together for about 5 years. I met the man I'm currently dating on Hinge. Both times when getting back into dating after long relationships I heard that dating apps sucked, and that it would take forever to meet someone I actually like, and to prepare myself for a string of bad experiences. So I kind of prepared for the worst and thought of it as just practice for talking to people.

Luckily, every man I met was a legitimately interesting and cool person. I only got _slightly_ uncomfortable vibes from one of them, and he (like all the others) handled it very maturely when I later told him I just wasn't feeling a connection. None except one ended up being a romantic match, but I had a really nice time talking with all of them.

Maybe part of it is just that I'm pretty particular with who I bother talking to and meeting. I don't have much energy or time for meeting new people, so don't schedule many dates. On the other hand, this also means my positive experience is not very trustworthy, as it is likely I just haven't met enough people to give myself a proper chance at a negative experience.

Nevertheless, I do not find dating apps fun or pleasant in any way - they're more like a means to an end that I'd rather step away from as soon as I meet someone I actually like. This tends to be a bad strategy, as from what I understand the other party often doesn't approach focus or exclusivity on the same timeline. So there's a risk of a mismatch in investment (time and emotional), which can become a problem.
Simple hack that has helped me is changing “todo” to “maybedo”. It reminds me that at some point I thought whatever task was worth doing but gives me the freedom to do something else as needed. Most weeks, I make a “maybedo” list at the beginning of the work week on my whiteboard and erase items as they get completed. Erasing is just as satisfying as crossing off and keeps me out of the hyper-evaluative state of comparing how many things I’ve done vs where I started.
This reminds me of how for centuries mathematics wrote “is equal to” or similar.

Recorde’s “=“ took centuries to catch on widely, so I guess it’s no surprise we still see “if and only if” instead of “≡.”
The UAE is massive on surveillance and tracking of individuals. It is ubiquitous.

Crypto payments that sidestep the "surveillance plugs" make things difficult for Brother Eye.

Crypto salary contracts will formalize the accountability via ensuring the government is always in the 'know' of 'A' and 'B'. Added advantage of now being privy to any and all intermediate steps of the crypto transaction.... for science.

Another facet of UAE law is that you will never know if you are truly doing something legal or illegal, and they like it that way (Cardinal Richelieu would be proud). Interpretation by their sharia-esque judges is everything, and depending on the parties involved (rich vs poor; local vs foreigner; muslim vs buddhist etc) interpretation is easily gamed. Like everywhere but without the 'easily' or the pretense.
Re-Imagining Motion Control
Does Tor Browser disable cookies? I think not.

You don’t have to login to be given a cookie that’s then stored and tracked across each new IP that Tor cycles through.
What physical assets does X have in Ireland to seize? The Fenian street office in Dublin is leased and TikTok took over most of that space anyway.
> in memory joins (until they added the preview relationalJoin feature)

This, to me, was the single issue that made me forever not take Prisma seriously. I get that “ship now, fix later” is a mindset, but you simply cannot ship an RDBMS wrapper that doesn’t handle JOINs. That’s an integral part of the system.

> the connection pooling defaults are surprising (never reaps idle connections, AFAIK not cgroups aware and over provisions the pool size based on host CPU count)

Tbf I have yet to find a piece of software that hasn’t messed up cgroupsv1. That’s not really an excuse – read docs – but at least everyone seems to make the same mistake.
An unordered list of things I miss in Go
Yes!

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bumble-relaunches-app-tool-re...
While I appreciate all criticism of this approach in the comments, it's not that simple.

1. There may be audit policies, compliance policies, retention policies in place. You may HAVE to keep data which is deleted from user's perspective.

2. People make mistakes. While I agree that restoring a long ago soft-deleted object may be very tricky because of referential integrity. It's easy to restore a recently (hours, days) soft-deleted object. Not only easy, it's much faster than restoring a point-in-time backup of an entire database. Also restored version is guaranteed to be the latest one, unlike in backup.

3. PostgreSQL supports partial indexes and partial unique constraints. https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/indexes-partial.html

Other databases support similar features too. That allows excluding soft-deleted records from indexes, makes indexes smaller. A good query does not scan a table anyway. If one needs to read less pages from a table, PostgreSQL has CLUSTER command. If there are too many soft-deleted tuples, maybe it's time to think about an archive table anyway.

Unique constraints may ignore soft-deleted objects, so only active objects need to be unique. That is very useful if you need to support idempotent calls. Additionally that may actually be a security feature too. If I create a new user with the same username as an old deleted user, I know that username is unique, but also, that I will not accidentally get permissions of the old user assigned.

4. The worst is tooling. Forgetting "WHERE deleted_at IS NOT NULL" or "WHERE NOT is_deleted" is a very real problem. I would rather advise against soft deleted objects because of that problem alone.

On the other hand, if you use a decent ORM, (and why would not you?) like SQLAlchemy, Django ORM or EntityFramework/Linq (sorry for guys who are not Python/.Net, I do not have a good example for you), then it's quite easy to create a default model query which is not empty. But honestly, if your system is complex enough and has any custom row level security, if it is multi-tenant, if not all users see everything, you already have quite similar problem, you already have to start with non-empty query which already has WHERE and possibly even JOIN clauses. Without a good ORM it will suck anyway.
I've never had Postgres "go down". It might if you run out of disk space, but that is going to be a bad time with any database. It is not "competing for resources" when it is running the workload your app is sending it. You may as well say Sqlite is competing for resources in that case.
I've opted to just incognito the majority of my browsing. Likewise it's annoying to keep logging in and sometimes I wish I had something from my history. On the other hand, I never have to worry about cookies
Marriage rates down 70% compared to 50 years ago. Natural selection will play out here.
because their target are not nerds using tor to access their own machines or random 4ch clones.

they target politicians, whistleblowers and journalists.

if you ever volunteered to organizations helping those you quickly Learn that group is not very tech literate, have cheap limited devices, skips instructions.
Vestibular Training to Reduce Dizziness
Rawls' "thought experiment" is used to prove that all people would choose socialism. It's an explicitly political use of begging the question, as I said.

Kant was a moral philosopher. There is a difference. And there's a reason why Locke, Hume, Rousseau, and Kant never came up with Rawl's "veil of ignorance": because it is itself ignorant.
You only have to mess up once.

Google has programs where they can identify budding extremists and correlate behavior to medical diagnoses without HIPAA exposure.

If your secret weird shit that you’re doing with Tor is of interest, they’ll eventually get a profile. Using Tor is like setting off the bat signal.
1. If you define your self worth in terms of usefulness to others, it really sucks when you retire and can't do stuff for others any more.

2. NEVER pay for storage of stuff, you'll end up purging most of it anyway, or your heirs will.

3. The words of the philosopher Jagger are profound:

You can't always get what you want,

But, if you try, sometimes you might find

You get what you need

4. Keeping a diary, the times I did it, are fun to re-read... I wish I had done it more. You can never take too many photos, if in doubt... take the picture, you'll not get the chance again later.
Investing Rules Warren Buffett Lives By
In my humble opinion these are the absolute best explanatory videos of how things work on the web. The accurate, easy to follow script, the production, voiceover, complexity of topics. This is staggering.

I highly recommend to look through other videos on this channel. I am not affiliated of course, just the biggest fan.
Do you know Slint?

I haven't really used it, but it seems to use the same idea, except it's native to Rust but comes with its own C++ and JavaScript bindings. I believe the project was started by some folks that left Qt (or some company that held the IPR at some point..).
Yes, but a comment like:

> Europe can keep doing its regulatory thing while the US works to improve. At least someone is doing something.

is perfectly fine.

On the other hand, somebody questioning what's actually improving in the US is a low quality comment because "it's politics".

The US has regressed down in every possible human development index in the last 2 decades, from happiness and freedoms, to longevity, inequality and societal division.

Here are some receipts:

- Freedom index https://sites.uci.edu/energyobserver/2020/01/15/the-united-s...

- Longevity https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2023/03/25/1164819...

- Inequality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_inequality_in_the_Unite... (inequality, by the way, is inversely correlated to strength of labor unions)

- Medical costs https://www.statista.com/chart/8658/health-spending-per-capi...

Since when are statistics and facts considered low quality posts and "politics"?

My point is that the low amount of regulation in the US is part of the reasons why US consumers are taking a hit, whether it's monopolistic app stores that can crank prices, exorbitant medical costs, plummeting living standards and rampant inequality, and crashing longevity and happiness.
I strongly suspect that the reason is more to do with producing artificial scarcity of hardware so that they can continue their loss-leader pricing strategy. Typical Xbox controllers go for £50 new; that's a quarter of the price of the Xbox itself, yet all one gets is a piece of moulded plastic with a few buttons on it!

PS. COD4 is apparently set in 2011 - do players not have automatic weapons anyway?
Just realized I should have written one of these for the Constant evaluation:

eval (Constant n) = Right n
eval (Constant n) = return n
I was surprised that residential electrical wiring was such a nuanced thing. You ask a simple question like "why are neutral and ground connected?" to 10 electricians and you'll get 10 difference answers. I probably spent a good 5 hours to get to the bottom of it and now I have to remind myself again how it works.
Presumably, you think we should what? Take the to the streets? Standard of living of food security is still far too high generally for this to seem reasonable for most.

Shall we lobby our representatives? This does happen at the state level, and accordingly many states have more pro-worker policies and laws. But change at the federal level is a substantially harder thing to bring.
Yes it can be done with rules, inheritance, triggers, and updatable views.

See my answer on stack overflow

https://stackoverflow.com/a/78694335/4188138

However, in my experience, it's more easily maintainable to use normal deletes, have a trigger to move it to a schemaless table (jsonb column type that contains all of the data at the time of delete), and have manual restore logic via a good UX.
Second's an Eternity
I'd argue the vast majority of it is, from newspaper articles spanning back centuries to the vast majority of books written, down to every conversation someone has had on public social media websites such as Reddit.
Nebraska goes a step further. Lots of companies have a "use it or lose it" policy for vacation time, so they won't have a ton of liability on the books. Nebraska courts have declared that vacation time is compensation that can't be taken away from you, so "lose it" isn't an option. I worked for a company with half its workforce in Nebraska even though I'm in Minnesota. To comply with the law, the company didn't pay out your vacation at the end of the year - they locked you out and forced you to take it, now.
One of the reasons for JSX originally was to reduce usage of the DOM APIs, as they are slower than direct JS object manipulation. The JSX diff of prev/next allows you to minimize DOM API calls.

I would guess there is more overhead in creating a dom element than a JS object (which JSX elements compile to).
The thought of setting up and paying for tinder again makes me scream internally. Even sadder is that most sex in my life was indeed through paid tinder subscriptions and almost all sex through dating apps. It's too easy for women to simply launch the app, upload the photos they already have from FB and IG, then start swiping with very high match ratio. It's too tempting even from sheer boredom and vanity. Real life chat and pickup will bring you only frustration and sometimes even problems. There are numerous male on female incidents of pushiness and violence and you will be immediately associated with them. It's impossible to succeed if all initiative is on you and you're ruthlessly judged by every gesture, word, sentence, verbal proposal, appearance detail. Delegate all these to an app even if success ratio is only 0.1% or so.
Most important is phermone compatibility, and you can only gauge it by smell and presence.
Online dating is therefore doomed to failure from the get go, because it ignores it completely.
Of course, you can get very, very lucky...
If the woman doesn't smell right (read: irresistible), all the other qualities don't really matter. It happens pretty rarely that a woman smells just so right that your head starts spinning, and that's the only type of girl worth going out with as far as I'm concerned.

I surmise that a big portion of people that hooked up via dating apps are incompatible at a fundamental level and they just don't know better.
Because like it or not every program ends up as machine code. C is the closest you can get to that without being machine specific. C is like cooking with only basic raw ingredients. Everything else is like out of a packet.
> I posed this question in a top-level comment, but I'll throw it out here too: world governments are more interested than ever in making sure their fabs are on the leading edge. Could this serve to create more parity than we've seen historically?

Not while ASML is a bottleneck.
the real inflection point is when an AI can autonomously make money. then it can keep buying servers to replicate itself
After reading this, I was reminded of one of those "survive in the wilderness" shows I saw a couple of weeks ago that had a great quote at the beginning (a Tanzanian proverb):

> Little by little, a little becomes a lot

I think this might be a better real-world representation of the concept described in the post. I get the impression that the flywheel metaphor implies something positive, whereas the proverb strikes me as much more ambiguous (and a little more menacing). Technical debt is the first thing that comes to mind.

That being said, one of my favorite bosses of all time used the flywheel metaphor to encourage the engineers at our consulting company to build cool things to put out in the world when we were on the bench. He wanted us to be seen as a really cool organization with talented people. Unfortunately, the company ended up going out of business.

As a developer, it always blows my mind when I look at something large I (or others) have built and wonder how it was able to get done. It's a culmination of small efforts spread out over time, until you wake up one day and realize the result is something impressive in scope. I think that might be my favorite part of being a programmer.
Subreddits to submit your startup without getting banned
Rawls' "thought experiment" is always employed by people who already agree with him about liberalism, to "prove" that everyone would agree with him if he rigs the experiment.

(And by the way, if you want to see ignorance, look in the mirror.)
I'd love to hear about your absolute numbers.

We had a similar problem, Datomic/Datascript not having an open format like RDF, but RDF being clunky and slow, so we build our own open-source solution in Rust (https://github.com/triblespace).

On an M1max we're currently at ~3us per query for a single result (so essentially per query overhead), and have something like 1m QRPS for queries with 3-4 joins.

I'm curious if you've somehow managed to shave off another order of magnitude, as I suspect that most WCO joins will be similarly limited by memory bandwidth.
We for example worked out a novel join algorithm family (Atreides Join) and supporting trie based in-memory and succinct zero-copy on-disk data-structures, just to get rid of the query optimiser and its massive constant factor.
The only way to anonymize it enough, also defeating any attempt at cookie/malware injection to me would be to create a VM with the strict necessary to run Tor browser and clone it for single use, that is, a script that clones the VM, opens it, let you use Tor browser, then as you close the browser the VM is also closed and deleted. The script could also create the next VM changing bits here and there for added anonymization (OS and browser signature, screen and window size, mouse settings, etc) while the old one is still running, to save time.
Backup copies. Or do you not back up your data?
What is someone going to do, build an app that does exactly what these apps are not doing so that they make no money and go out of business?
> As for who would pay for that, who can say, should it be government run?

Distribute the cost by distributing sources. The GNU/Linux ecosystem has been operating just fine on this model for decades.
Both output and outcome metrics, collaborative discussion process is important.

We cant say, one is need and one is not!
Install a cookie autodelete extension. That will let you whitelist cookies you want for persistent logins and discard the rest. They can usually be configured to purge on tab closing.
MIFARE Classic are cheap and reliable, only their encryption is broken. One can use them as simple storage and encrypt/authenticate data by different means. Nothing wrong with that. I did that, ECC signatures are small enough to fit in 2K/4K cards.
> ebook: 1817.93 eur

Wtaf.