skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I’d agree, being wrong doesn’t mean the reasoning was wrong. They bet on the most likely and I would think it was at the time the most likely. Something less likely happened instead. Doesn’t make them stupid at all, it just illustrates that predicting the future is hard if not impossible.
-fno-exceptions doesn't get rid of exceptions, it just causes your program to abort when one is thrown, which sounds--kind of worse? How do you deal with (for example) a constructor that fails? And if you're using the Standard Library, it is very difficult to avoid code that might throw an exception.
It can, and it does on decent runtimes.
Twitter also pulled out of Brazil. While I presume Musk is at least partially playing this up, they apparently got some kind of secret court order.

Anyone has any idea what's going on down there?
> In practice, none of the day-long plans are actually a day. The gun isn't actually to your head. You can go home and sleep.
Hmm, seems to me historically the left has been at the forefront of protesting against nuclear anything, while conservatives have been promoting it even for energy supply. That is an instance of conservatives promoting something new, while the left has been wary of it.
Come back and explain to me how wonderfully perfect rust is, after it is as old as C variants. Let's say 2040 at the earliest, maybe 2050.

Legacy will affect rust too. It's not better, just younger.

I tend to think of coding languages as laws passed by parliaments. A lot of legacy laws, and regulations hang around pver time.
Yea, I was thinking of adding that feature, would be very useful to not have to plug the feed into a app to see it

Added to the list!
"Write everything twice" is a great heuristic. Extreme programming and unit tests is a dumb and wasteful technique. You end up cornering yourself.
We need to open source the world! Especially as the world is built on open source
Ah ok. That makes a lot more sense.
Curious what revenue the store was generating without any competition in your small town?
Only two?! *cry in posix BRE, posix ERE, PCRE, JS regexp, .NET regexp, emacs regexp*
I'm sorry, but I really don't understand the point you're making here.

Frameworks have evolved over time, as we've identified better ways of doing things and as the browsers have implemented native solutions to problems that frameworks were invented to address.

For example, we don't use dojo anymore. Or ember. Or backbone. The list of once-popular frameworks that have faded is long.

The point that I (and and increasing number of other developers) have been making for a while now is that React has hit this stage. Many of the problems it was invented to solve are mostly not currently relevant as native solutions have become more widely adopted.

This has caused React to evolve into bloatware in an effort to maintain mind share. I think that evolution has had the opposite effect. I think it has driven many developers to seek simpler solutions.

I think it's completely valid to recognize framework's strengths and (especially) weaknesses. You can call this "blame" or just a justified critique.

I agree with your point that lower-skilled developers can make a mess out of any technology, but one of the supposed benefits to adopting a framework is to provide guard rails against this. If that's not working, it makes you question the fundamental value of using a framework at all.
Human behaviors are commodities. For every "good" there is a "bad" under active exploitation.

For instance, health information can be used to recommend relevant product, and it can be sold to insurance companies who will dynamically adjust your rates based on your "health profile." All from an invasive tracking pixel. Thanks, Meta.

The only positive outcome is increased data privacy standards.
Maybe they are more equally poor? Anyone wanna chart that as per capita GDP vs Gini index, as a loose approximation?
Write everything (generally, new features) twice has turned out to be really good strategy for me, but it doesn't sit well with bizdev or project managers and tends to be perceived as unnecessary slowness.

But if you plow through a feature and get it "working," you'll do much of that work cleaning up the logic and refactoring through your first pass. What rewriting allows you to do is crystalize the logic flow you developed the first time and start cherry-picking in a more linear fashion to meet the blueprint. It also tends to reduce the urge (/ need) for larger scale refactorings later on.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41275600
I've never heard a good, convincing explanation as to why on earth children need iPads for any reason. Are the schools just not doing their jobs, and letting the iPads "teach" the children rather than a person doing it?
Housing is inexpensive in places where people don’t want to live. Not all locations are equivalent.

Hunger is generally a distribution and pricing problem more than a supply problem.
social matching

Facebook and Linkedin suggest people pretty regularly. The problem is that there’s often a good reason we havent already connected despite 15 years of opportunity.
Looks quite like magentic [0] that I've been building, though broader in scope? I'm (clearly) a huge advocate of pydantic, structured outputs, and keeping control flow in python code (rather than inside abstractions / "chains") as much as possible, so it's great to see those values here too! I'd be interested to hear what you consider in vs out of scope for mirascope and the long-term vision. Also would be cool for one of us to do a mirascope vs magentic comparison blog post.

[0] https://github.com/jackmpcollins/magentic
Can I use the VS Code C++ extensions still?
> not enough "China is leapfrogging us" takes. eg China uses machine learning to automate production more than is done in the West

What are you reading? This is the dominant drumbeat. There are also subsidies, which we’re now matching.
Sorry, are you saying unit testing is dumb? Not that you'd be the first to say such a thing, but I've never really understood this if people find them valuable. 100% test coverage is one thing, but having some interdependent functions that do one small thing is a perfect use case for unit tests.
You can absolutely try. There are companies which provide support for out of support frameworks like Angular 1.

In reality there’s not enough Spring committers who don’t work for Broadcom for it to happen widely. (Also Broadcom has other options, eg follow Elastic and Cockroach Labs and change license.)

If you’re a senior dev, you need to be commercially astute — like finance folk can read balance sheets, you should be able to glean commercial implications from a project’s commit history.

PS. I’m a big fan of ensuring engineers get paid. If you actively choose to use Spring, buy a darn support contract and support its development. Given how many of you are on Spring 5.x or earlier even now, you’ll have to do so anyway if you want sec fixes. It’s a bit late to be looking for options in the short to medium term.
The blog seems to have some more details and features: https://bold-edit.com/blog/wrote-my-own.html. The feature set does seem nice, will keep an eye for this, but likely that you will have to pry Emacs out of my dead hands :)
The energy density of fossil fuels is just too great. The battery of a Tesla stores as much energy as 2.5 gallons of gasoline. That's 1000 lbs of Tesla battery vs 20 lbs of gasoline. Tesla was able to make their cars work through more efficient electric motors and reduced rolling friction. We're no where close to making electric planes, locomotives, or earth moving equipment that are 100% battery powered. The batteries would just be too big.

Not to mention the amazing other uses for crude oil: lubricants, solvents, fertilizer, plastics. Crude oil is an absolutely amazing substance.
The hong kong police had to release this statement recently:

HKPF reminds the public that the following websites are not the official Hong Kong Police Force website.

1. 96o.1ss5623.com
2. joshhyoung.icu
3. amylfraser.xyz
4. tiaflowe.icu
Humans probably believe in true things because lack of conception of logic would lead to cognitive retardation. It is also possible to say that it is impossible to not to believe in true things, because belief may be a definition of the truth. Finally, truth may not really be related to belief at all very directly: for example Bayesian, quantum, fuzzy logics can have somewhat strange conceptions of truth—modelling quantum phenomena gets even stranger. Yet the most interesting interpretation of truth is not, unlike many of our times would like to have believed (!!!), related to Gödel but Embeddes Agency which models the behaviour of an agent under various environments.
Imagine if prison sentences didn't have a time cap.

For many serious crimes, they don't. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_imprisonment
It's a forever loan for whatever your average payables total to over 90 days (so $10k every month would be a $30k loan). The loan lasts forever or until you close out that line of credit/wind up the company.
...you just made me realize I know (some of) the differences between JS and .NET regexp, in addition to vim and PCRE.

Profanity.
We could just tax them more heavily like we did a few decades ago, when they were as high as 90%.

Maybe draw a line where society can create millionaires and hundred millionaires but not billionaires.
Yup, they're browbeating because it used to work. Shaming people into breaking the rocks.

Men aren't working because they feel there's nothing in it for them anymore. The pay barely keeps them spinning their wheels, their prospects of having something higher than themselves to live for, such as a family, are bleak, and there's no security in employment.

I know, for me, I focused on cost cutting rather than revenue generation, reduced the amount of time I have to work to virtually nothing, and instead of feeling useless, living in squalor, my standard of living went way up, not down. I get to focus on whatever I want, a lot of the time that's nothing at all, but often enough it's extremely rewarding endeavors, like FLOSS, learning, finding love and starting a family, being out in nature, cooking, constructive hobbies. I don't have a commute, I don't sit in traffic, I don't have a 4 figure rent, I've got nobody to compete with via conspicuous consumption.
This is terrible news, and I hope this opens up the eyes of people who don't see the dangers of user-hostile and locked down "walled gardens".
AI-generated song about immigrants storms into German Top 50
I guess i don’t care very much about the “ergonomics”, like sorted hashes or whatever. I’d be really happy with faster execution, smaller memory footprint, smaller binaries. Conditional compilation would be great, but maybe smart utilization of code generation is sufficient here. For me the glaring gap i suffer with is data processing and ML, which is a community/library thing.
I've been nagging about it for years, there are too many people and not enough jobs.

And it's one large reason why salaries have stagnated, especially in the service industry where there are numerous applications for a position, they'll simply get the lowest bidder who is capable enough to do the job.

Raising the minimum wage could help a little, but I suspect most will just cut employees and merge roles, and again find the lowest bidder.
I don't take climate deniers like yourself seriously.
Yes, vscode-neovim makes VSCode's editor be Neovim. It works very well with other VSCode extensions. For example, you can type `gd` to go to the definition of a C++ identifier.
Only after it burned to the ground. And everybody in sight got sued, even the power company.

So that I have heard "since that building in Oakland..." but that's just because it's a recent case. The pattern of which administration said what and who got sued is more indicative that things will be just business as usual in a few years. To be fair also, "that building" was compounding many of the possible options for killing people by fire: terrible wiring, floorplan, floorplan construction materials, decor materials, and escape routes ... in which it was running a music event (dark, crowded, people unfamiliar with the venue and to the venue)... upstairs.
You avoid any but trivial constructors an place all failable logic in a separate init()
With journalism having years ago devolved to quoting Twitter takes on air and in print, that is a strange thesis to make.
Russia controls almost 40% of the uranium conversion capacities and 46% of the enrichment capacities. China is also controlling some amount, leaving only 36% of the conversion (Canada, France) and about 42% of the enrichment capacities under control of allies.

https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-nuclear-power-industry-graphi...
You kinda do get a separate intent section. It begins with a string of "whereas".

As with code, adding more words rarely makes it clearer. In fact it usually introduces more discrepancies.
> meanwhile in the West we say they're dumping/subsidizing their industry

Machine learning isn’t manufacturing ev batteries or solar panels at below cost.

Also if you think they invented using machine learning to optimize production lines you must not actually work with any US based manufacturing companies. I can tell you I was helping US companies optimize via IOT sensors over a decade ago, and they were doing machine learning against those inputs before it became the hot new Silicon Valley term of the decade.
Same.

They do need to fix the For You feed though. Lots of engagement farming and outrage-y content, despite vehement muting.
The thickness of TP is manipulated upwards by adding voids between the layers, this is marketed as "air pockets, air cushions, etc) but it's nothing more than a marketing trick to explain the cheapening of TP

While it's true you don't want an very dense paper to maximize absorbency, the large voids in TP don't affect it's absorbency in a significant way because they are thin and weak and completely colapse when wet. Get rid of the gimmicky air pockets and you'd decrease the thickness by half at least.

Edit: you can see this for yourself with a little experiment at home. Get yourself a air-puffed TP (Walmart's house brand is a particularly egregious example) and drizzle a little water on on it, you'll be able to see it's volume actually decreases as it's fluffy air pockets colapse when wet. Compare this to the behavior of a non-scam fluffy absorber like Sodium Polyacrylate (diapers) which will swell in size when wet.
"Write everything twice" is sometimes called a "spike."[0]

> A spike is a product development method originating from extreme programming that uses the simplest possible program to explore potential solutions.

In my career, I have often spiked a solution, thrown it away, and then written a test to drive out a worthy implementation.

0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spike_(software_development)
Ukraine's incursion into Russia may have changed the course of the war
This is just a T-shaped skillset described by one of those people who are oddly-allergic to using already existing terminology and have to invent their own.
Sounds kinda useless, TBH. This sounds as if it assumes the exact same context window across requests. If so, given the 5 minute window, unless for example your entire team is operating in the same codebase at the same time, you won't really see any savings beyond simple prompts.

Are contexts included in the prompt cache? Are they identified as the same or not? What happens if we approach the 10k token range? 128k? 1M?
I have YouTube ReVanced, which is better than premium, which is still not as good as mpv.

Other services are strictly premium, paid affairs. Still not as good as mpv.
I gather that in really old regex syntax the word boundary syntax used to be like this:

[[:<:]]foo[[:>:]]

...so it could be worse!
“Stellar engines are a class of hypothetical megastructures which use the resources of a star to generate available work,” for example, to “produce thrust [to] accelerate a star and anything orbiting it in a given direction” [1].

(I don’t think it works with a brown dwarf.)

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_engine
100% this should never be an excuse to push for a faster outcome. I have to admit though, as a personal mental exercise, this has saved me countless of hours from going down the rabbit hole of over-engineering. Some problems just need a simple solution, sometimes even without any changes to code.
With technology so old and with so many plants which were built in the past, it should not need a huge political will anymore to be successful. But it is still so expensive that it has simply no chance on the market. In contrast, renewables are now cheap. And this is what Germany achieved with its - certainly substantial - investment.
WHO declares Monkeypox a public health emergency of international concern
That claim is obviously absurd. If solar power now is cheaper than fossils then it’ll be cheaper to make them with solar energy going forward. Maaaaybe that’s why China itself is building an insane amount of solar energy within their own country.

It’s not like China has particularly cheap fossil fuels. They import most of it. A dependence they’re desperate to break I might add.

Yes, they also build coal power plants. But a little known fact is that they’re built more as a backup for renewables in the transition. Possibly also as a short sighted GDP boost (see: all the empty apartments they’ve built). Gas power serves that purpose in Europe, but China doesn’t have a lot of gas. Coal power isn’t great in that role but it does work.

The average coal plant utilisation rate has been steadily declining in China.

China just had its largest drop in fossil fuel power output since the pandemic, with the share of coal reaching a record low

https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-chinas-clean-energy-pus...
Exactly, the economics, and gains of the economic system are f-ed up.
I dunno, I think it's generally quite useful to identify relations between similar concepts. Not always easy to find one that fits perfectly but usually it just needs a bit of a tweak.

Like in this case, the situation you describe is exactly what a garbage collected language does, the key is that they let you mark what memory is still in use with a reference. Similarly in this case, there should be an explicitly defined time with a rule that if police want to hold something longer, they need to actively justify why and what the expected timeline is for the return without the owner needing to take them to court over it. Not perfect, but neither is garbage collection, and to me sounds much improved from what we've got.
I suppose you are technically correct that noexcept can throw to themselves. But that's just being pedantic, isn't it? From the observer/caller point of view the function won't ever throw. It will always return (or abort).
It's a common problem, which is why it's also a commonly solved problem. Sublime Text has been GPU accelerated for over a decade, there's multiple GPU-accelerated terminal emulators for all the terminal-based editors, VSCode is GPU accelerated, …
So basically, Java's generic interfaces are equivalent to Rust's traits with associated types, and Java has no equivalent for a Rust trait with type parameters, at least in terms of this part of the language.

I'm not sure how or if Rust traits can be used as function parameters - can I have a function that takes a parameter of type Iter? Can it take any implementation of Iter than, regardless of what item type that returns? How would I define a function that only accepts iterators that return, say, i32 items?
Unit tests are a waste of time.

Design by Contract + system tests are a far superior technique that take less time and find more bugs.
The link details posted to you by the other commenter might be one part of why Twitter left Brazil. But there could be "more devious" stuff happening behind the scenes. If that's the case, and with Twitter being a tad too twitchy or zealous (for whatever reason), they may end up being a really good "canary in the coalmine" for weird and shadowy government orders/letters.
Twitter is bleeding money. Seems likely Musk will use any excuse to shut down ongoing expenses he doesn't think he needs anymore.
More like "this is how you creep in justice". You set a date and politicians will spend months determining what's too long/too short. Or in this case, the judges may not get a unanimous ruling as easily. The article mentions that this is a DC appeals court that establishes this, and several other circuits have rules otherwise.

The fastest way is leaving it vague, waiting for some court case to set precedent on what is "too long" and use that as a reference for future court cases. Or in this case, it may in fact go to the supreme court who will be able to determine a more concrete time (or just throw it all away and doom us all).
In the US, I've had the privilege of watching several relatives pass away at old ages, all of whom suffered cognitive decline. What a learning experience these were. In every case, doctors did nothing that would have influenced patient autonomy. I can see vividly the challenge this article is presenting.

How can we make mental health screening mandatory without unintended harmful consequences? It can't be threatening to people's identity and rights. Mental health screening should be presented as something valuable and risk free.

The current approach has a built-in assumption that anyone who looks old is already transitioning responsibilities to their other family members. Not every family works like that. The bank did not ask my uncle if he had anosognosia when they foreclosed his house and took all of his equity.

Even years of counseling/therapy could miss anosognosia when there is an expectation the patient wants a specific problem was addressed. Recently I was diagnosed with adult ADHD, so prior to that, I had undiagnosed anosognosia. I had been seeing a therapist to deal with the family death issues and this never came up.

If doctors instituted decent mental health screening as part of their standard practice, then it would help to address a pervasive single-point-of-failure problem (where the patient has failed to adequately identify their mental health issue).
The Midori operating system internal Microsoft presentation, back in 2013 [video]
And those can succeed where the Sufficiently Smart Compilers failed because:

1) They can adapt to variable-latency memory operations, because they aren't an ahead-of-time compiler.

2) They can adapt to the capabilities of the hardware they're running on, because they ARE the hardware.
Probably 90% of what kids do on phones is consumption, not production.
Superconducting Wire Sets New Current Capacity Record
I once had the cops seize $800 in cash I had on me to pay for motorcycle service (15% discount with cash) and hold it for 3 months.

Eventually I got a letter saying I had to show up and prove I wasnt going to do drugs with it. So I showed up with my invoice.

Then I was told I had to submit fingerprints and sign a letter promising I wasnt going to do drugs and I refused.

Finally a month later they sent me a letter saying I had forfeited the money and I showed up again (took a day off work) and they said I had to go to court. So I went to court, and the judge spent ten minutes telling the cops that didnt show up I had to get my money back.

Next month after that I got a call saying I had property to pick up and that I'd be fined daily if I didnt. So I got the money back.
The fish with the genome 30 times larger than ours gets sequenced
These are old news. Everyone keeps beating on Cambodia for this. There have been many crackdowns and the scammers have moved on to other countries. Cambodia is an easy country for western critics to rain on because it does not have the money to run its own PR campaigns like Thailand or Vietnam which also have many of these scam operations.
Space Travel and the Cold War Fantastic – The Case of Robert Sheckley
Which websites does it search for jobs? LinkedIn or also specific websites of companies?
Very common, the first thing I check when this kind of error pops up.