skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hey HN,

I’ve been working on something exciting that could be a game-changer in decentralized finance and AI-driven GPU autonomous crypto mining. The EdgePUG Protocol is an open-source project that leverages decentralized GPU (DePIN) resources and advanced AI to create a self-sustaining, scalable mining system.

We’re tackling some of the biggest challenges in the current market, such as cloud centralization, ASIC mining centralization, and the inefficiencies of traditional systems. By shifting to a GPU-focused approach and integrating AI, our goal is to democratize the mining process, ensuring a more equitable distribution of rewards while generating a self-sustaining AI computing system.

If you’re interested in the intersection of AI, DeFi, and BlockDAG technology, I’d love to hear your thoughts on our white paper. We’re always looking for feedback and ideas from the community.

Check out the white paper here https://edgepug.com/, and let’s discuss how we can push the boundaries of what’s possible in this space!

Juan Bujanda
X: @juanpbujanda
LinkedIn: juanbujanda
Thanks for the feedback. We built Trellis based on our experience with ingesting and analyzing unstructured customer calls and chats in a reliable way. We couldn’t find a good solution apart from developing a dedicated ML pipeline, which is quite difficult to maintain.

There are some elements that might resemble Dagster, but I believe the challenging part is constructing validation systems that ensure high accuracy and correct schemas while processing all kinds of complex PDFs and document edge cases. Over the past few weeks, our engineering team has spent a lot of time developing a vision model robust enough to extract nested tables from documents
I don’t understand how Tesla is continuing to ride so high on a borderline-vaporware robotaxi when Waymo is so far ahead.
I imagine such calculations immediately break down when you make the input (funding, interest) depend on the output. Which is the case in reality.

For example, say your calculations say that the optimal time for the mission is 10 years from now, once a currently in-development propulsion technology matures. You publish that, and the investors, government and the public, all motivated to support you by the dream of your ambitious mission, suddenly lose interest. Your funding dries out, as you're repeatedly told to call back in 10 years. The fact that the 10 year estimate, having been dependent on existing funding, is now "literally never", escapes them.

See also: "nuclear fusion is always 30 years away". It is, because original 30 year timeframe assumed continued funding that never happened, and it's not happening because "it's always been 30 years away".
Blog-Building Intensive Fellows
When you're born into a cult, it's much harder to see it or the outside world objectively.
From the article:

> That the three methods disagree “is not telling us about fundamental physics,” Freedman said. “That’s telling us there’s some systematic [error] in one or more of the distance methods.”

Freedman is saying that the model is not wrong.
As a per-creation consumer, yearly billing seems worse to me. Now I need to decide once a year if I am still comfortable supporting each channel, and I can't revise that based on whether the channel has decided to go totally idle throughout the year, or any other relationship.

So I guess I'm back to my original position - I will cancel 75% of my Patreon subscriptions when this lands.
> A EULA needs to be a contract.

Nope. It can just be a piece of text you agree with when opening a classic mass-marked app in a shrink-warpped box ("shrink-wrap EULA") or a dialog box with text where you have to click that by using the software, you agree with the licensing terms.

Exactly the same as when you deploy an AGPL program for visitors, you are agreeing to its EULA.
One of the best things about Waymo vs Uber and Lyft is that they drive smooth and comfortable, they aren’t zooming around between every stoplight and making me carsick.
> An election is a legal event and the constitution requires the states to conduct elections in a representative format, which is violated if they then defer to the electoral results of another state.

The history of the Electoral College seems very much at odds with that notion. Indeed, the current state of the Electoral College is at odds with it, since the states mostly switched to winner-take-all apportionment about 100 years ago, and now we regularly get outcomes where the winner of the popular vote is not the winner of the Electoral College.
Lyft shares suffer big fall, even as it reports first quarterly profit
Please if you report segments, use a correct type!

I’ve seen enough segments to be marked as ads when they are self-promotion and self-promotion when they are barely promotion and more like further exploration info.
Half of American now carry credit card debt, many with no plan to pay it off
Ratpoison, a tiling window manager for Linux, did this. The devs hit the point where they realized they were basically implementing parts of Lisp to allow more configuration. They ended up creating StumpWM in Common Lisp to be like Ratpoison if it allowed more configuration.
Anyone wanting to work on a new language is most welcome to help out on mine: jank. It's a native Clojure dialect on LLVM with C++ interop and all the JIT goodies one expects from a lisp.

jank is currently part of a mentorship program, too, so you can join (for sree) and get mentored by me on C++, compiler dev, and Clojure runtime internals.

1. https://jank-lang.org/
2. https://clojureverse.org/t/announcing-the-scicloj-open-sourc...
its non-sense that Meta is calling the photo of Trump raising his fists after getting shot as fake?

https://www.skynews.com.au/world-news/there-was-no-real-assa...

its not censorship that searching said assassination attempt of Tr- in search suggestions did not yield the most relevant and recent news even after Google themselves admitted to election interference?

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/google-admits-to-omittin...

Seems to me you are just denying all these things because you don't like the political party or its candidate and going off tangent about democracy.

My original comment was flagged and now it is unflagged because it didn't violate any rules which you pointed out and its important because its relevant to the topic of censorship on platforms which we are discussing here contrary to your claims that its "boring" (your own subjective biases being projected here again I should add).

As you can see all I did was simply observe one political campaign utilizing a non-American platform which isn't even worthy of censorship or rule breaking:

It's interesting that Kamala's campaign is making heavy use of TikTok to promote itself to younger audience on a platform that is obviously affiliated with CCP
> (unless they have A Clockwork Orange–style devices holding the eyelids open).

That’s how it works yes.
These answers are a much better presentation of your position in the market than how you described the company in the post above.

I found TimescaleDB after I wrote this — it does look like the answer to my problems from a decade ago. I don’t do that anymore but I’m glad someone brought it to market.

If you can describe with clarity how a scientist/hardware engineer using your tool is going to implement their anomaly detection, or whether your software will somehow shadow and assist/learn from what they try to do, I think that would be a much more compelling pitch.
My point is we cannot leave it to market research and forces to solve this for us. Unwavering collective action is required to overcome the greed and apathy that allows things like lead to continue to destroy our minds and environments.
Special forces tend to care most about physical endurance and mental tenacity/toughness. 1 rep max, 3km speed PR, not so much. Can you hike for 48 hours without sleep matters more.
This is only a problem if you also restrict immigration. Fertility crisis issues are not generally global. That solution costs effectively $0.
Machine Learning seems to be a hot technical skill that is in demand almost everywhere and pays very well. Korean companies are poaching ML engineers from the US and paying nearly SF salaries without the SF cost of living.

It's fueled by the LLM "AI" hype, so not sure how long the demand will last.

---

One of my friends thinks Salesforce is her ticket to a better career, but I'm not convinced...

---

Svelte(Kit) is very niche. The DX is very nice. While React has the quantity of openings, it seems Svelte has the quality openings. At least I found one of my best clients via the Svelte community.
1px-wide font
What Attacks a Virus?
It requires a lot of things.

For starters, engineers will disagree on what "a higher standard" means.
This sounds like an issue that could be solved in your app. I hesitate to say it's an issue with your app, because I wouldn't have thought of it either, but you should be able to fix it without involving Google, and the fix is simple enough that Google can say it's your fault.

You are getting the same callback URL twice, and the second time the request is failing. Why not instead, if the user is already authorised, let them keep their authorisation and continue by redirecting the user to the same place they would go if it was a new authorisation? This solution works if you are using a session cookie.

If you need to set new cookies upon authorisation, that won't work because the browser won't receive the new cookie before the second request. Another possibility is to cache the whole request and response for a short time in case an identical request is received. Since the whole request is identical there will be no security issues from nonce reuse.

Alternatively, you could allow nonce reuse within a small time window. I'm not familiar with the web stack enough to evaluate the security implications of this.
Yes. And law enforcement seems to have consistent problems with p-hacking any new kind of evidence they are allowed to have. That's why the use of things like this tends to be denied.

That said, if some country manages to create a law enforcement organization with the right culture, it does indeed become much less of a problem. But it needs to guarantee the culture won't change either, and that the data won't become available for different organizations.
I was about to leave a very witty "just be idempotent ;)" response but did not consider the nonce. I'd be surprised if Google is quick to change this, so I guess be stateful on the receiving server, persist that you handled a certain request already, and if you get a duplicate request, replay the response from the first one?
It is not surprising that the message of "We are facing demographic collapse" correlates strongly with "We need highly capable robotic workers". Especially among certain high profile people. I just don't see it coming together like those proponents say it will.

Any other comments about the truthiness of those statements or the truthiness of the correlation will just get into politics, so I'll stop before that.
It's been a while since I've thought about this stuff, but can you put the state param into a cookie (possibly encrypted, but I don't think that's necessary)? Assuming you don't use something like auth0, you can clear the nonce cookie at the same time that you set the login cookie. If they come into your callback without a nonce cookie (or with a non-matching one), you can kick them back to your landing page (or last saved redirect page) without processing the login attempt. If they were already logged in because you already processed it, they stay logged in.

The attack the nonce is meant to prevent is tricking someone into logging into the wrong account, right? The attacker can't access or guess the user's cookie to put the right nonce into the URL, so I think that should be safe?

If auth0 were going to implement this in the middle for you, then there might be some subtleties to think about with the redirect on failure unless you always send the user to a landing page. More layers of redirects make this kind of thing hard to think through. What's the purpose of auth0 for what you're doing?

This might also not work if the authorization code is not re-usable (they're not supposed to be according to the spec) and your backend already used it. If it doesn't work, you could again kick the user back to a landing page, tell them the IdP had an error, and ask them to try again. Or I suppose if you're saving the login to a backend session, then it should just work and you can ignore the error.
Search warrants are usually public record after they are unsealed. If they aren't included in evidence its a Brady violation and if caught the case is essentially dead. If the defense sees that the search warrant was given or executed first, they probably have a very strong argument that all the evidence is tainted. Parallel construction doesn't work very well when proof of tainted evidence is publicly available.
That's an interesting possible solution if you're in control of the server. If you're using a third-party vendor like Auth0 to handle the redirect callback, then of course you're beholden to their implementation.

In Auth0's case, it appears the nonce is consumed early in the handling of the callback. In my correspondence with them, I confirmed that they do see that the first request is aborted (in the form of a log), but they take no action as a consequence.
maybe if you throttle your network (e.g. "low end mobile") you can hit it?
decay exists as an extant form of life
There is finesse to it. You are translating from one culture to another.
Yeah, lots of different uses for a keyboard with wildly different frequency distributions. Writing an English letter != text chat in Spanish != data entry != league of legends. It's also not quite a substitution cipher due to modifiers (shift), toggles (caps lock), non-printable characters (escape, volume up/down), and deletion (backspace/delete).

It's an interesting problem you'd probably try to solve with Markov chains back in the day, but now you'd just throw machine learning at.
I think the Gitlab experience is slightly better when dealing with collaboration on private repositories with multiple people not necessarily in the same org. Also, Gitlab had free private repo support beyond what Github offered for a long time, so most of my private repos are on Gitlab.
I'd be careful about implementing it without the appropriate support at least. The cheapest option is to do no work, that's not going to get you very far. The cost of the infra always has to be held up against the value of the product.
> Most of the hate toward LLMs seem to focus on their not being even a little oracular

I don't see that. I see contempt for the idea that AI can be applied to everything or even tagged on to things with little or no AI for the purpose of marketing or attracting investment.
I wanted something slightly more realistic. It works just as well if the garage is an apartment building where everyone keeps their apartment unlocked.
It's in the blog. The author mentions finding that matte inkjet paper worked fairly well.

There are much cheaper membranes; ESS for example uses a membrane that is used by lithium ion batteries (I think) and thus is commonly available and very inexpensive.
>> TV/iPad/iPhone/PC, ancient clothes washing machine, modern dishwasher, router/modem, TV etc.

Crucially, none of those can move around on their own or (attempt to) grasp objects within their reach (or without).
Congrats on the launch, and thanks for using Intercom (co-founder here)
Another highlight of Worm: it's one of those universes that works very well for cross-over fanfiction. Like Stargate.

...Oddly, very few Stargate-Worm crossovers. A good Fallout-Worm comedy: https://m.fanfiction.net/s/12952969/
FIPS Post Quantum Crypto standards approved
That seems like an exaggeration.
According to Google Cloud, our App was created in 2018.

ChatGPT, Retool, Ramp, PostHog and HubSpot have the behaviour you've described.

I checked my browser history for `oauth/consent` and found the following examples with the loading behaviour:

HelpScout, Google Cloud, Termly.io
The server can't reliably detect that.
But solar plus batteries is cheaper, right? People will naturally choose them?
You can express yourself as long it aligns with us ...
That seems unsurprising to me, but all I know is that if I have to get an employee to unlock a case to buy a thing, I'm not buying that thing there. Not out of some sort of principled stance, but just because it's too much bother.

On the other hand, I will buy items from stores that have a "take a slip and present to the cashier" system rather than the "find an employee and get them to unlock the case" system because it's less of a hassle.
Backpropping filter coefficients sounds clever, but can't you just do that on any layer that takes a spectrum as input?
"Sublime Debug" would be a take-my-money product. :D
It's madness to me that people (not OP specifically) will simultaneously say "you have to outsource login to a third party, storing passwords safely is too hard" and... also this.

The answer to "what can I do" is "stop depending on a third party service that's critical for your business and essentially trivial to replace".
Well, for a popular and somewhat mainstream service like Patreon, it likely would be both.

Patreon likely gets some users who first discover Patreon via the iOS app and who would never go to the Patreon website but who would be comfortable making an iOS in-app purchase.

And Patreon also likely gets some users who first discover Patreon via the iOS app and would be comfortable going to the Patreon website to subscribe if the iOS app didn't have in-app purchases.

I was referring to that first group, which I suspect is a small portion of Patreon's total userbase, but I suspect it's a niche that Patreon is very interested in (both because Patreon can't engage them through any other channel, and because they probably have above-average discretionary spending).

The whole "protecting users from themselves" thing is just a very tired argument. You might as well say that an operating system implementing memory protection is "protecting users from themselves." Or a software vendor offering security updates is "protecting users from themselves."
No, it just needs 2 extra resistors to work properly, but will work as-is if you use USB-A to USB-C cables and as long as you don't pull more power than available by default (i.e. you can request 3A @ 5V just by adding two resistors, but without it you're limited to USB's defaults)

In the past, when usb-c just got introduced micro usb ports for significantly cheaper than usb-c, so it made some sense. Today, it makes no sense.
Not to excuse the non-debouncing behavior, but I wonder how much of those 15% are an actual loss, since it’s limited to users who are not interested enough to try a second time. I’m not denying there’s an actual loss, but it may be significantly less than the nominal 15%, and it would be interesting by how much.
Google's Quickshare was found vulnerable to RCE
Not only can you increase the font size, but Safari has an immersive "reader mode" where you can change the font and color scheme, and even have Safari dictate the page to you. A massive percentage of organizations that develop native iOS apps do so because:

* Users have been indoctrinated by years of marketing (e.g. the "there's an app for that" ads).

* Safari hides the "add to home screen button" deep within the share menu, and home screen real estate is incredibly valuable. Native apps have the advantage of Smart Banners [1].

* For several years Webkit didn't support notifications, and as much as I hate annoying notifications, it's undoubtably useful from a business perspective to be able to ping users and remind them to use your application. Even after allowing notifications in Webkit, they made sure to introduce Live Activities which are exclusive to native apps.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39181567
You had finance professors who were unfamiliar with Bastiat’s parable of the broken window? Or unable to apply it to the military-industrial complex?

Our universities may be in worse shape than I thought.
Font with Built-In Syntax Highlighting
In many use cases, like flagging documents for compliance issues or processing customer emails, it's challenging to manage this at the vendor level because end customers want the ability to apply business logic and run different analyses.

For data ingestion and mapping, I agree that in an ideal world, we would all have first-party API integrations. However, many industries still rely on PDFs and CSV files to transfer data.
OK I'll bite: What does starship add here? It's a very large re-useable faring that carries a stage + payload into orbit? Why not attach to the top of FH?

Why: FH + Starship w/( rocket + payload)

And not: FH + (rocket + payload)
What she means is that the bar for proving that this is an error in physics is much higher than that of proving that it's a measurement error. Like, if you're measuring acceleration due to gravity, and your sensor/calculation gives you 5m/s^2 rather than the real ~9.81m/s^2 that everything else measures, you can't immediately resort to arguing that physics is wrong, you have to rule out that your sensor/calculation is wrong first.

To argue that the physics is wrong, you are likely to be arguing that very well tested theories like general relativity, special relativity or electromagnetism are off in some way. That's a much higher bar than just the measurements of either the ladder or CMB being wrong in some way.
Is this another kind of co-pilot ? what kind of performance improvement you see than the other established copilots in h2loop.
I do stacked PRs for complex changes, and Github has been updating branch bases to support this workflow for at least two years now.
That researcher has a personal conviction that the model isn't wrong. That is spurring them to spend the years and decades necessary to assemble the experimental evidence to test the model. Either it'll turn out to be wrong or right in the end, but the conviction is what gives that individual researcher the impetus to keep scratching at the problem for a good chunk of their life.

You shouldn't really roll your eyes at that. They're ultimately doing all the work which will prove it right or wrong. They might wind up not liking the answer they get, but the conviction is necessary to get them there because human emotions are weird.
> It is a Rorschach blot about Rorschach blots.

In mathematical terms, its called as homotopies about homotopies about homotopies.

https://youtu.be/N7wNWQ4aTLQ?t=283
Open Source FPGA Expansion Card for the Apple II
Kind of related topic: Using libraries is a pain - Is there any evidence that people are using LLM coding tools to write library functions instead of importing libraries? How would we tell? Can you think of second order effects from this?
> Nix is very unobtrusive on non-nixos installs,

You may be speaking from the perspective of using Linux because this here is some "you gotta be kidding me": https://nix.dev/manual/nix/2.18/installation/installing-bina...
Both interesting ideas! I'll pass along in my ongoing chat with Auth0. At first thought, the security implications don't seem problematic.
Table of US Deaths by a physician or surgeon or by medical treatment
My first computer was a Timex 2068, while at the school lab we had Amstrad PC1512 with 5" floppies and no HD...

Naturally when we speak about PC, we don't mean the original IBM PC and nothing else.
UAW files labor charges against Musk and Trump for alleged union-busting talk