skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I guess there must be at least one book about the Java Memory Model, which is very different but fascinating? I don't know of any specific books to recommend.

For many languages there is nothing resembling this, they tend to not get into the details Mara covers, if you get a mutex and maybe atomic arithmetic then they're done.

If you wondered about C or C++, this book is the same content as for those languages but with Rust's syntax. The discrepancy between Rust's memory model and the memory model adopted in C++ 11 and subsequently C is mostly about a feature that's not available in your C or C++ compiler and (which is why Rust doesn't have it) probably won't ever be.

C++ x.store(r1, std::memory_order_relaxed);

is literally the same thing as

Rust x.store(r1, std::sync::atomic::Ordering::Relaxed);

The biggest syntax difference is that C++ x.store(r1) compiles, and in Rust it doesn't. But, chances are after reading Mara's book you will think it's weird not to specify the Ordering needed and never use this uh, convenience.
Nice!

Other epstein guests include bill clinton and bill gates? Should I not contribute to there charities? Or do they dress fancy enough for me to help?

Actually I was aware of all of this. Show me where he was convicted. I'm currently talking to him about the hospital. I live in Puerto Rico so I'm well connected to some of the top doctors on the island. It seems once again, well meaning but he got screwed over by his financial partners and now he's left with a bill for a community hospital. There's no value in just letting the hospital fail. Someone needs to help him keep this community hospital from going away. Also it doesn't seem he wants to administer it, he just needs an administrator who isn't going to rob him.

Look I know it's easy to say rich man bad. Look at how funny looks. But the reality is no one benefits from him failing at helping this island so instead of whining about all the problems on the island, I intend on using my hard earned money on helping him not fail on specific projects underwhich neither of us economically are rewarded. I'm sorry if this upsets you.
The universe is a 4 dimensional sphere, so everything could be moving away without increasing 3 dimensional space. Eventually in trillion or quadrillions of years everything would start to blue shift as things move towards us on the other side of the sphere.
> Imagine the operational benefits: tasks that once required multiple employees and countless hours of human oversight can now be managed autonomously by AI.

The oversight role does not go away, it is even mentioned later in the article as a potential future human job role.

I think we do need to be careful about eliminating lower skill jobs and expecting those displaced workers to jump into higher skill technical roles they likely can’t do. While saving the company money might sound good in the short term, a population without disposable income isn’t going to be able to buy anything to keep the businesses and economy going. If all the companies are relying on consumer debt to solve that little wrinkle, the bubble will eventually pop.

While I don’t know the validity, there is that old story of Henry Ford raising pay and moving to a 40 hour work week. The idea being that people needed money and free time if they were going to buy and enjoy a car. Free time without money doesn’t lead to sustainable spending we can build decades of economic growth on.
> How are pyramid-building cultures definitely unrelated to mound-building cultures?

You're asserting a causal relationship, not a functional or morphological similarity. You haven't made an argument for that yet.

> This says the Clovis people of Clovis, New Mexico are the oldest around

They aren't. Pre-clovis is well established at this point. I'm not sure you intend this with your phrasing, but maybe this will be useful. Archaeological cultures like Clovis don't name a "people" because the actual humans or may not have shared unified identities. Type sites also just represent a clear example of the broader category they're naming rather than anything about where things originated.

There's also thousands and thousands of years separation between Clovis Mexica, Mound cultures, or the Maya, so unless you make an argument I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. Do you think all lithics are the same?

> The Olmecs, Aztecs, and Mayans all worked stone.

1) you've made the same naming mistake again and 2) this isn't an argument for anything.
> So you'd introduce every time, as your (infant|toddler|young

As opposed to what? I’m not arrogant enough to assume every stranger online knows the general age of my kids.
There's quite an escalation of topics for Rust.

If you want to write a HTTP server, people are guided towards Axum/Tokio, and thus async rust.

If you want to use async Rust, read this book?

This books covers assembly level atomics, and creating your own channels, in beginner chapters.

Is that necessary for writing a HTTP server in Rust?

From the topics in the TOC, this book is useful of you want you write concurrency primitives. I wouldn't recommend it if you just want to _use_ Arc/Mutex/crossbeam-channel.
One is a regulatory agency, the other is not. USAF doesn’t benefit from Chevron like EPA and others do (or did). Also these cleanups come out of their budgets and they’d rather (mis)spend it elsewhere.
https://github.com/Orama-Interactive/Pixelorama is FOSS (MIT license) and available for free on itch.io
mmm... meat sphere.
Skip straight to Lua
I have always-on display turned on. So the screen is always showing something, just not anything important, like the notification I just got, or the next turn on my navigation route, or whatever.

If you ever used a watch that did show notifications automatically with an always-on screen and then went back to one that doesn't, you would probably notice that it's way slower, and also there are many times where you can see the watch screen but it's not convenient to do a gesture.
Totally disagree. Administrative law has not changed every four years, and it is literally impossible for Congress to legislate every detail of every policy.

The intent of overturning Chevron was to do away with regulations, and it's likely to work. Congress could spend a month working out the exact right policies and chemicals and requirements for PFAS, and there would still be some loophole / discovery that a chemical is slightly different than exactly what was legislated. And in the meantime, the

This is literally like saying the Alphabet board of directors should have to write every product requirement for every product in every company in Alphabet's portfolio. Delegation is the only way large organizations can work effectively, and outlawing it in government is expressly intended to make government impossible.
Same here. It's been great, and I'm on the Ultra 1 still.

I will say it wasn't great when I had the non-Ultra. It was fine at first, the watch would last a full day, but like 2 or 3 years later it would struggle if I did a lot of exercise in a day to make it to the time I go to bed.

I also recently went on a 5-day backpacking trip and it was a struggle to keep my phone and watch charged with an external battery. If the ultra lasted even 3 days instead of just 2ish on a charge this would have made it way easier. By the end of the trip to save charge I just gave up charging the watch.
What is a CPU?

If it's AWS hosted for example it can range from a t2 (low end) to c7a (high end) and have huge performance impacts. How will this change over time?

It's weird that pricing is based on CPU but it's never defined. And how do we compare between offerings when that much is not obvious?
People are coming to them with sagging skin from Ozempic. Since 6% of Americans are on it now (according to that article), how is that competition for the plastic surgeons?
What a funny way to think about it. Gordo again gets all the blame.
The next tallest building could be a 3k-feet-high battery
Yes, but then all apps would be poorly-written webapps in a single-threaded language with a bunch of performance kludges bolted on (like WASM, which STILL inexplicably can't directly edit the DOM).

There's frankly not much of a technical reason why Android phones and iPhones can't run each others' apps except for the malignant IP enforcement of both Google and Apple.

This is a business problem - take away Apple's 30% cut and see how quickly they change their tune on "security."
Get honest feedback from your waitlist – We'll help you build the survey
We've all been there - struggling to get meaningful feedback from our earliest users and waitlist participants. It's like pulling teeth to get them to respond to surveys, and even then, the feedback can be shallow.

There's a way to change that? We've built a platform that rewards users for sharing their honest opinions, and we're looking for founders to partner with.

Here's the deal: we'll help you develop a survey that gets to the heart of what you need to know about your waitlist. What are their pain points? What are they looking for in your product? What's the one thing that's holding them back from becoming a paying customer?

Our platform, emetearn.com, is designed to make market research affordable and accessible to businesses of all sizes. By partnering with us, you'll get:

An incentivization tool that helps you get honest feedback from your waitlist participants.

Actionable insights to inform your product development.

A clear understanding of what your customers are looking for

And the best part? Your users are incentivized to provide high-quality feedback as the value of their insights increases as it's licensed. The better the insights, the more money they can earn.

If you're tired of guessing what your customers want, DM me to learn more about how we can help. We're looking for a handful of founders to partner with on this, so don't miss out.

Let's get real feedback from our customers and build products that actually solve their problems.
Aw, come on, man. I want both!
If the courts decide against the USAF's interpretation of the ruling, will you change your mind?
- 21 security fixes were addressed in 126.0.6478.56/57( Windows, Mac)

- $168615 awarded to security researchers and unknown $X in TBD bounties

I sure hope they're refactoring parts of the codebase to leverage memory-safe languages.
Congress doesn't need to pass a law per chemical, they need to firmly and clearly pass a law to follow up with what they want that bar for review to be in a way the Supreme Court is left without a doubt of what the existing laws meant to say.

The consequences of reversing Chevron definitely seem dire to me but the court's majority opinion of why they did is also pretty reasonable.
I tried using supabase to back a vercel project. It was far too slow so we switched back to postgresql included with vercel. Turns out that was neon under the hood. The project is called webtm.io. It's opensource so you should be able to see this in history.
I think the whole paper is a satire lol.
Yeah, Clickbait Remover extension is similar. It's available for all main browsers and replaces the egregious thumbnails with a frame from either the first, middle, or last part of the video. I like it!
I am not sure if relevant, but I think there might also be a legal risk if Valve goes harder on games. Valve not contributing meaningfully to "first party" games makes them less susceptible.
I hear you, but I think people often overlook that developers have practical considerations to take into account. I've gone full tilt with Stipple Effect this whole year, and I have living expenses to consider.

I also don't see how the license prohibits you from doing what you expressed, though that may be an oversight on my part. I'm happy to be educated or listen to what specific concerns you have about how the license or distribution model limits what you would hope to get out of the program.
> It breaks nothing.

OOFFF yeah, that is out of touch.

Reminds me of something Linus said

> The gcc people have a BAD attitude. When the meaning of "inline" changed (from a "inline this" to "hey, it's a hint"), the gcc people never EVER said "sorry". They effectively said "screw you".

> Comparing it to the kernel is ludicrous. We care about user-space interfaces to an insane degree. We go to extreme lengths to maintain even badly designed or unintentional interfaces. Breaking user programs simply isn't acceptable. We're _not_ like the gcc developers. We know that people use old binaries for years and years, and that making a new release doesn't mean that you can just throw that out. You can trust us.

Which I think is an important lesson here. About how when you build tools, people build around you and what they have to work with. But I'm surprised this attitude is not more common, because I don't know a single person who is unfazed when changes happen that break their programs/workflow. It's reasonable for someone to be upset. And not a single person is ever like "no worries, I'll go read the commits first, no need for documentation." (Don't get me started on "my code is so clear it doesn't need documentation" people...).

I think one big issue with all this is that costs are outsourced either to time or someone who isn't you, and this naively makes people believe that there is no cost (and sometimes fight to reject claims of cost. There is always a cost. There's a cost to everything). I wonder how much time and money would be saved if we recognized this. I just don't know how to motivate solving this, as it's non-obvious.

https://yarchive.net/comp/linux/gcc_vs_kernel_stability.html
This can be done without Chevron - Congress just needs to be more explicit than they were pre-Chevron, or else risk lengthy litigation.
> I just wanted to point out that there is a fundamental reason that for loops are inferior to map/reduce when working with data.

> For loops is "how" where map/reduce is "what" and that puts the burden on you when you need to parallelize your job.

That's not inferior. That's one advantage that map/reduce has in the set of trade-offs between them. I'm aware of that argument. It's part of what I was trying to get at with the "less powerful" comment (the other side of the coin of being less powerful/more constrained is that it's easier to parallelize).

But ~95% of code never makes it to that step. And I've found that defaulting to it leads to worse code bases, instead of defaulting to the simple intuitive thing and accepting the burden for the other 5% of the code.

Because the burden of that 5% of the code is never the biggest part of scaling. It's usually something like getting the business to understand the implications of CAP theorem and figuring out what trade-offs are best for them. The code is pretty easy, by comparison. Even if I have to chuck out 5% of the files and re-write them over a period of time.

I guess my recommendation is basically to do things that don't scale in your code, because 95% of code won't need to, and the other 5% has a good chance of being re-written anyway during the process of scaling.
What I found is that, for cross-language use-cases, this often just applies the intonation of the “context” sample to the created sample, which, if they are from different languages, usually gives the wrong result (in the sense that it sounds off).
Happy to see Framework continue to improve the older models as well:

> Putting Meteor Lake aside for a moment, what's really surprising here is how much better the 12th-gen Framework Laptop does in this test than it did when we originally tested it. It still doesn't last as long as the 13th-gen board in the same laptop, but it's now very close, which can likely be attributed to some combination of BIOS and driver updates. It lasted a few hours longer in the PCMark battery life test than it did before, even with the new screen installed.

> This is one reason why it's important for companies to have robust, consistent firmware and software updates: You can correct and improve upon your products' performance pretty substantially after they release, in addition to providing ongoing security patches (this BIOS update also happens to be the one that makes the 12th-gen Framework's USB-C ports into fully certified Thunderbolt ports). The 13th-generation Intel Framework still improves battery life, but the wide gulf we originally observed between the two models has been mostly closed, and now the Ryzen version of the laptop is the one with the worst battery life (albeit by a narrow margin, and not one that erases Ryzen's CPU and GPU performance advantages).

> Battery life has always been one of the weaker points of the Framework Laptop 13, but a few years of continuous iterations have improved the situation quite a bit. You should be able to make it through a full workday with any of the Framework boards at this point, provided you have a relatively fresh battery.

Still waiting for an OLED screen option - but as long as external video doesn't work under Linux on a MacBook air - I think my next machine will be a framework.
The classic for Java is "Java Concurrency in Practice", a great book for more than just Java.

Java's happens-before memory model is similar to C++'s.

I'll prob get this book, if only for the memory model chapter.
Was looking for this exactly. I understand that you have to make money somehow if you want to dedicate yourself to YouTube, but I always found sponsor segments to be worse than native advertising, and just plain gross to watch.
In biology, the most important step is finding the right thing to measure. Biological systems are highly contextual, so the second most important step is finding the second thing to measure in relationship to the first thing.

In the case of AlphaFold, measuring crystal structures is the most important thing (molecular phenotype). The second most important thing is measuring many genomes. Multiple sequence alignments allows evolution (variation under selection) to tell you about the important bits of the structure. The distance from aligned DNA sequences to protein structure isn't a bridge too far.

Unfortunately, biology has been mislead by the popularity of transcriptomics, which the post touches on briefly (limits of single-cell approaches). Transcriptomics generates lots of data (relatively) cheaply, but isn't really the right thing to measure most of the time because it is too far removed causally from the organismal phenotype, the thing we generally care about in biomedicine. Although gene expression has provided some insights, we've exhausted most of its value by now and I doubt ML will rescue it (speaking from personal experience).
Yep I missed the "English" text right on the first line, sorry.
Sure, and you can absolutely use Photoshop, if you paid for it, and promise not to reverse engineer anything.

Or, what do you think usage restrictions are or look like?

If you don't share those modifications then you must not host that software such that it communicates with visitors; that's a restriction.

The modifications that you are required to share cannot be any arbitrary modifications; anything you add has to be AGPL compatible.

If the modifications combine the software with GPL-incompatible pieces, then you cannot share those modifications, which means there is no legal way to host that software for visitors.
Is this actually legally binding? What would be the difference w.r.t. informed consent, between DCOs and the "I have read and accept the terms and conditions" checkboxes from most websites?

It also gives me similar vibes to the Do-Not-Track HTTP header since both can be enabled by default.
Complex geopolitics involving Saudi Arabia, Iran, Israel, the US, China, and several other players
Glad to have them on the case. Did such a great job with those levees.
I hope that’s not the last charge levied. A police raid designed to retaliate against journalists for being journalists should result in more than one tangential prosecution.
16:9 is a compromise ratio for content viewing.
It fits both 4:3 TV content and 2.40:1 movie content.
Once 16:9 widescreen was popular media started adopting it natively
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16:9_aspect_ratio#History
Compute size is measured in CUs. 1CU is 1vCPU and 4GiB of RAM. Database compute and it's read replicas autoscale from 0.25 to 10 CU based on load and down to zero when inactive.

And autoscaling works like this: https://neon.tech/docs/introduction/autoscaling
The Supreme Court made the right decision.

Unlike the hyperbolic coverage in the press - the decision did not say that judges are now responsible for making regulation, rather than experts in regulatory agencies.

What they said is that now, if a statute is ambiguous, a regulatory agency makes a regulation that falls within that ambiguity, and someone files a lawsuit, the courts can play their standard, established role in resolving the ambiguity and figuring out the intent of Congress and determining whether the regulation is authorized by statute.

Previously, Chevron deference required the courts to defer to the agency's interpretation of the statute, regardless of how
unreasonable that interpretation was.

This was abused by people who used it as a loophole to push through regulation which they knew would not be politically viable in Congress. Chevon deference allowed an end-run around democracy. And also led to uncertainty - because these regulations were politically controversial and not supported by law, just by executive branch fiat, they are prone to being revoked whenever the party holding the presidency changes.

If a topic is important enough, Congress can always resolve any of these issues by amending the relevant statute.

All of these controversies over Supreme Court decisions really come down to people who are advocating for positions and regulations which are unachievable through the normal political, legislative process in the US getting upset that the Supreme Court is not allowing them to enact these policies through backdoors and loopholes rather than the democratic process.
> Is there a summary somewhere?

We need analysis, not summary of the statute. What it compels whom to do, and how different principles were balanced in its drafting.
Maybe they'll sell your heart health data to life insurance companies. You can't trust google and they can't make hardware anyway
> Pixels were the best selling android smartphone of 2023 in Japan. It's gained a lot of popularity recently here in Japan.

Whilst true, it's a bit misleading in the sense it's only best selling by a very slim margin. It's iphone and then everything else (by a huge margin).
Sponsored segments always have stipulations on what you need to mention and how. Some may let you add some pizzazz, but that's why they all sound the same. Thats part of the contract.

Even that pizzazz is risky though. Sometimes videos get delayed simply because the sponsor comes in last minute and needs to debate the segment.
This one does dubbing, but is there an equivalent tool for subs?
You're attracting downvotes, but I think you make a good point. It's a legitimate question to ask, why would the Air Force, which is very much under the control of the executive, be defiant in this case? I would expect the current administration to be supportive of the EPA. Is this some kind of political maneuver? I mean, the president is currently making the argument for SCOTUS reform, so this could be a way of making it look like a good idea.
I thought the older Pixel 8 Pro already had a "desktop mode" feature for that.
If you would like to reveal anything more fully about this, feel free to reach out to me via my website or social media accounts. I think that me asking for further clarification here is not going to be very fruitful. Thanks