skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's simply extending the line to the obvious next dot. It gets more uncomfortable to think about so we often don't want to, but what exactly do you think is the eventual outcome of those effects on the health of millions of people?

Think of the many factors that combine to determine when someone dies of "old age" or "natural causes". Think of the extra effort millions of bodies have spent dealing with the pollutants directly and the effects those pollutants have on those bodies.

Someone in VW's position could say, "well our pollutants were one cause among many" for any specific death. But they were part of the math. They contributed a share and lied about the size of it. They did indeed contribute to shortening the lifespan of millions of Europeans.
Whoever owns the tweets is completely irrelevant.

If it is within his right to use this data for training purposes, then that's it.

And he is, btw.

And those terms were in place since way before he took over Twitter, btw, btw.
We can argue about the extent of this contribution, and whether it was negligible, but not about if it actually happened.

(Unfortunately emissions are not the only culprit and a lot of particulate matter that has negative impact on overall population health in cities comes from brakes and tires but nobody figured a feasible way to deal with that yet.)
RIP to a legend!
Django got hit with an SQL injection vulnerability just the other day. I basically fell out of my chair when I saw it.
It is not. This is wholly false
The Swatch x {Omega,Blancpain} watches are fascinating to me. I wonder how much "brand damage" this inflicts on 2 iconic watch designs. For a long time it seemed like Swatch didn't really advertise their ownership of many premium watch brands. Now it seems to have shifted.
I don't think that is a realistic conclusion. If one group found it, we can assume that there exists at least one other group that is capable of finding. It therefore is not unrealistic to believe this has seen limited exploitation by sufficiently motivated actors.
also related they now believe earth's water is older than the sun by finding a similar pattern around another star

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/earth-scientists-...
That's not any conservatism that I recognize. In fact, what is espoused there is exactly the progressive left (Herbert Harcuse's "repressive tolerance") mindset.

And while I will grant you that liberalism (not to be confused with leftism), is different then conservatism, both (classical) liberalism and conservatism strongly require equal treatment (procedural symmetry).
At least that stuff is actually informative to a human. A lot of Amazon's URL bloat is the analytics crap they shove into query string. I started using ClearURLs specifically because of Amazon.
I liked the anagram map. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Underground_anagram_map

finding a high quality SVG version in 2006 before it got taken down was a point of some pride for me at the time. I probably have it laying around somewhere still..
The comments here are interesting. Read them.

On the subject of the article: the author was a senior undergraduate. They taught a single course. If you have taught once, you learned this much too.

Their course met one hour, once a week, in the evening. They lectured. This is an absolutely awful arrangement (and choice) from every viewpoint. Make no sweeping conclusions.

They only scratched the surface of what there is to learn about teaching.
He calls file extensions cruft, but i've come to value them. They are a simple way to indicate file type - desired or offered - which is easily understood by machines and people.

I currently work with an API which does a bit of content negotiation using the Accept header, so clients can request data in various formats - application/json for a snapshot, text/event-stream for an updating feed, or text/html for an interactive dashboard. I wish it didn't. I wish we'd just used file extensions. Trivial to use in a browser or via curl, trivial to implement on either side.
I enjoyed the use of illustration. Seems like an appropriate usage.

Sometimes I feel like these articles with interactive illustrations are more like an excuse to put together a bunch of cool demos, like there's a lot of fluff with not much substance (a bit like a TED talk), but this one didn't let the illustrations take over.
And I'm so glad they eventually registered delicious.com (or whatever it was) because remembering exactly where those "."s went was a real pain.
Exactly. Additionally, there is the problem that one of the two pupils of the pair

- is lazy or

- is a lone wolf or

- has a very different style of thinking from the other, which the other one cannot make use of
You have it backwards. The suits are way more comfortable with privacy violation than the Go team.
When you all self-host this, you also do the following, right?

- Create threat models that identify weaknesses in the design of your self-hosted setup.

- Harden the OS with things like MAC, and harden the container with dropped privs, read-only root filesystem, and outbound network filtering.

- Deploy an intrusion detection system to know if you've been compromised.

- Perform all OS and app patching automatically, or regularly without fail.

- Follow CVE feeds in case a zero day needs to be fixed before the next patch window.

- Arrange for an expert to perform regular penetration tests.

- Deploy a tool that detects and alerts on things like firewall misconfigurations.

- Regularly test your backup and recovery methods, since if you also store 2FA codes and backup codes in there, you could be permanently locked out of your accounts.
> I don't see how you can be forced to resolve all disputes via arbitration.

Ostensibly, the claimant wasn’t forced but contracted to do so. The problem, of course, is that an EULA for TV streaming shouldn’t extend to every interaction one has with one’s counterparty. And of course contracts should be negotiated between equals, not imposed unilaterally. The shrinkwrap agreement should IMHO be eliminated: one should either trade under standard society-wide terms, or negotiate terms on a case-by-case basis.

> If this is allowed to stand, it means that when visiting a Disney park, an employee could gun down hundreds of people, and they would have zero recourse. They could poison thousands of guests, and they would be stuck to resolution by arbitration, which is a process they entirely control.

Well, criminal charges would still be possible. Remember, the criminal and civil systems are different.

And of course arbitration is not supposed to be completely controlled by one of the parties. It may be in fact, but it’s not supposed to be. When the arbitration is between equals, it’s probably pretty fair; when it’s unilateral, it may not be.
This is really interesting and freaky at the same time! You say more complex games may soon be possible. What does that depend on?
Honest question: For the people not intending to "build a business on top of an open source library" but only intending to do something like "I just need this library to solve an issue in my work job" it's not simple to not touch it at all?

I had read a lot of conversations, and to be honest it's quite confusing for me the risk acceptance to have AGPL code in my codebase.
Alive and Well, as a Matter of Fax
Many apps are also ridden with ads, can collect way more personal info than a web site, and unlike sites, it's way harder to block their ads. (E.g., installing a PiHole on your network vs installing a browser extension.) Altering an app is a DMCA violation of whatever cryptography they use; altering a web site is your legal right via extensions/userscripts.
Changing the title of the question is the real wtf.
Nice features but I still prefer yank and put.
The up-thread’s comment (emphasis mine):

> And *if you are in control of producing data*, just produce strict RFC 4180-compliant CSV data

The point of the comment was that you likely aren’t in control of producing the data, so the article’s recommendation of using an entirely different format is likely also invalid. I’m not sure what you are arguing against as you seem to actually agree with them.
Musk has publicly stated his goal for AI is alignment with Truth, where truth is defined as to what corresponds with reality, not necessarily with the current social consensus. Specifically in terms of reason, given a set of facts, being able to reason to a real place, not just to a socially given answer.
> This naive algorithm runs in O(n2) time in Big O terms.

Is this true? The naive algorithm's outer loop (i) counts n - 1, while the inner loop (j) begins at i + 1 (so counts progressively less than n - 1).

Not a CS major, is this roughly equivalent (for large values of n) to O(n2) or is it, as it appears, something less?
To grossly oversimplify, this is the teaching model of Oxford and Cambridge. The primary method of instruction is the tutorial/supervision, usualy one tutor to two undergrads.
Imagine a kid insulting another kid on a playground. The other kid says "I know you are, but what am I?"

That's pretty much what's going on with the GP comment. It's a really low-effort and really transparent attempt to paint the other side with what your side has been accused of.

Mind you, I don't think it's a fair criticism of conservativism, either...
Yuestor
Reducing our dependence on the internet. If we do that, then internet accounts themselves will be less valuable and less prone to hacking.
Thanks, this saved me from scraping something.
I’m loosely reminded of that Roger Sterling quote from Mad Men: ”I'll tell you what brilliance in advertising is: 99 cents. Somebody thought of that."
> The only part disney has in it is they published the restuarants menu on the malls website, which reads 'Allergen Free'.

And this should be their line of defense, not "but you clicked on a trial of a streaming service 5 years ago".
I disagree because the problem of internet lock-in exists today, not a hypothetical future. It is already a big problem.
Isn't it just exporting/importing the data for each account?
The easiest people to advertise to are HN knowitalls that consider themselves infallible, completely logical beings.

Advertising works on you. You’re just, at best, describing a scenario where you aren’t being advertised things that you currently find appealing.

You’re currently on a social network that’s basically just YC’s advertising board.
Wouldn't you just encode the "+" if you wanted it as a literal?
There is no good reason to pursue a project like this (or if there is, it would be very surprising to me), so it would reek suspiciously of "not invented here".
Ah. Totally got it wrong then, thanks for explaining :-)
Generally a court order to seize goods. But most companies will just pay the judgement; companies need credit for efficient operation, and they are not granted the same leniency on delinquency that individuals are.
That is certainly a good point, but it doesn't free "us", only those smart enough not to use their phones for this purpose.
> He added: "I also thought, 'Let's get the geography as well because, with maps, shapes and geography are important.

Funny. I remember watching a design documentary years ago where they made the exact opposite point: subway maps were trying to get the geography right but that became unwieldy and confusing, so the epiphany was that connections mattered more than the geography. That the way people were using the maps was to get from place A to place B and what mattered was quickly navigating the intersections.
Ctrl Z
This is true for almost anything. 99.9% of the people out there know, for example, that killing another person is illegal. Your logic makes no sense here
> (In the more prestigious English universities, lecturers are still called 'Readers', and students say that they're 'reading' History or Computer Science rather than 'studying' it.)

Both of these are getting pretty outdated. Most of the top English unis have renamed senior lecturers/readers 'associate professors' because the North American naming conventions are becoming standard. I also haven't heard the "I'm reading X" way of putting it in at least a decade. It would be more common to say "I do X".
Wordpress gives a few good options to use slugs or names in a hierarchy.
Sure that overrides the disclaimer for the restaurant, and I'm inclined to agree with you there because every restaurant has some disclaimer like this that if enforced would make any "allergen-free" claims worthless everywhere.

But that would still make Disney less liable, because the in person conversation with staff/chef has nothing to do with Disney here.

Although it is interesting that the restaurants operated by others still use the "cast member" language. I do think Disney tries to have a bit of an illusion that everything on property including Disney springs is them. I still wouldn't consider it enough legally here but there is at least an argument about assumption of oversight.
> because people don't want less.

I do, the Amish do, and quite a few other people against technology DO want less. In fact, even ordinary people (non-techies) often tell me technology is too entrenched. What about those people ditching smartphones for dumphones. I don't think that tech improves things and I DO want less.
Thank you. TFA links to the map that was part of the Google/Samsung ad, but not to the map that apparently everyone is excited about and is the topic of the story. Ridiculously petty editorial choice for information hiding.
Artificial Intelligence (Patrick Henry Winston)
I think he means it in an abstract sense where people can transgress "natural law" are criminals even though the de jure law might contradict it. I think it comes from this old idea that legislation is really about discovering the natural law that governs human socialization and conviction is about discovering criminals.
A more charitable reading of the question could be, “what purpose do neutrinos serve in the complex world of elementary particles?”

Everyone benefits when physics and physicists are more approachable
Sure, languages have depth, and there is at some level some need to keep up with the Joneses (though to mix metaphors, different ecosystems have their red queens running at very different paces, and is it wise to be in or try to join the fastest paced race?), but I feel there is a distinction between following the latest hype blindly (and using the latest tool because of hype), and evaluating tools based on some criteria (and choosing the latest tool because it actually solves the problem on hand best). The latter is a skill that can be gained and taught in one ecosystem, and applied in another (and the former causes issues far too often).

I think this skill is very similar to what highly productive academics have, they evaluate and examine ideas, techniques and concepts from a wide variety of fields, and combine them to build new ones.
Here's a 25 video critique on the CMB projects by Pierre Robiteille

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnU8XK0C8oTDaiwe8Us_YNl4K...

He also has an alternative theory for stellar physics that might call into question the interpretation of Cepheids and SNs, tho I don't think he's done a major analysis there, at least afaik
> Um, jobs where someone under age 30 can be earning hundreds of thousands of dollars a year programming them?

Not a very fulfilling job in my opinion, except for the money.
Excellent, that works!
> So, no, it is not a requirement that std has to wrap any wrappable IOing API. This could be handled by the library ecosystem, if the language allows first-class bindings to raw OS APIs outside of compiler-privileged code

I... yes? But just because your language allows you to drop into assembly, or allows you to link against foreign functions, or however else it does FFI, that doesn't mean that your stdlib should contain only algorithms and data structures sans IO.

Let's take it to the absurdity and imagine a language which doesn't have even the standard halting continuation — i.e. that part of the runtime that calls sys_exit()/ExitProcess() — in its standard library (or its runtime). Is this reasonable? No, I don't think so: just because sometimes it is nice to have ability to not have this part of stdlib/runtime linked to your program (and Rust/C allow for that), that doesn't mean you should leave it to the community to figure out.
Only seaworthy ways of browsing the internet can be used to find it.
> It's also a stretch to claim Disney is responsible for what their tenants serve in restaurants.

Is it? Then why is Disney in the name of the location?
Also I get the feeling lot of instruction on topic like SQL Injection is just incorrect or not even best practise anymore. And it keeps being parroted. Like recommending input sanitization. It can be part of solution and probably should consider what to accept on any input. But it is not full or even efficient solution, specially when often it is implemented incorrectly or imperfectly...

So it is complex field and there is always more vectors like this.
The reek of putrefaction.
Whence cometh the squid? By what mechanism does it manipulate EM radiation? And what experiment could be devised to detect the squid?

That's not a theory, nothing has been explained, merely further convoluted.
Think its just dominating the industry with cheaper access to gpu's probably even subsidised pricing
You're going to need to provide a source for the definitions you're using for "conservatism", "liberalism" and "universalism".

Without those, your comment is difficult to make any sense of, since the way you're using those words seems to differ from any sort of standardized definition.
Why is Elon Musk's X struggling with technical problems?
It's C when compiled with the gcc or clang compiler.
'Deepfake Elon Musk' Became the Internet's Biggest Scammer
Hey Itay, thanks, and thanks for commenting, great to hear from you!!
Currently, I'm utilizing AI models that are available in the market, both closed-source and open-source.

I don't have the resources to develop my own model.

So, as more advanced models are released, especially in the field of coding, the platform will be able to adopt them and consequently create increasingly complex games!
"The London Underground map is one of the most recognisable in the world"

Why? How is it more recognizable that, say, the Paris one? Or New York?

EDIT: Since there are down votes, I will clarify my question do that we do not jump into underground nationalism: I was looking for unique features that make it recognizable.
As I mentioned in a comment: the ~~Peru~~ (EDIT: Nepal) flag is unique, this recognizable for instance.

If the map was round then yes, it is recognizable. Does it have any such features?

Or is it just recognizable because London is well known, so some stations are too?

EDIT 2: Please see PaulRobinson's answer for details
Canada's Housing Bust Pits Real Estate Coaches Against Students
> students are not smarter than students 25 years earlier, but are much better informed.

In my opinion typically they are informed about the wrong things (and also sometimes in a wrong way). Yes, I grow old. :-)
I had the Firefox extension log me out yesterday while I had no internet connection.

I'd say if it is a problem being fixed, it is not across the board yet.
Indeed! I'm writing an app that resizes and moves shapes on a canvas (among other things) and I'm amazed at how many trivial little things I had to write that everyone including me would take for granted, including copying and pasting, drawing the little handles to resize the shape, changing the cursor based on what's below it (the handles or the shapes), drawing a translucent version of the shape when it's being moved/resized, changing the position of the shape when it is resized from _some_ of the handles but not all (top left vs. bottom right)...
Android beta link:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.x8bit.bitw...

Web Android beta link:

https://play.google.com/apps/testing/com.x8bit.bitwarden.bet...
‘Loophole’ is another way of saying, ‘the law as written.’ The job of judges is to apply the law as written, not the law as they wish it would be.

I think that in general the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decisions have been misinterpreted in the media, and far less ridiculous than, say, Wickard v. Fillburn or Reynolds v. Simms.
Durable Objects – Unlimited single-threaded servers spread across the world
There is obviously truth in this, but I think it is more often the case than many people think it is that it is more efficient to learn the better tool "good enough" than to use the worse "I already know it" tool.

For instance, I've seen lots of people not want to learn sql and instead write complicated imperative implementations of relational primitives in the "I already know it" programming languages that are clearly "good enough" (because they are turing complete after all). But sql is usually a much better way to do this, and isn't hard to learn "good enough" to do most things.
> If you think there are others, please exhibit one.

One can construct such alternative theories quite easily: Everything is exactly as the "expanding universe theory" predicts except in a phone booth sized volume in a specific part of space 10 lightyears away from Earth where the universe is contracting.

Does not explain anything, and it is not testable in any practical sense. So it is not a good theory in any way, but it is a different one and it matches all the current observations.
My vaultwarden server is behind a vpn, so I just don't need any security measurements at all :)
This is far more difficult to follow than the normal one. Some lines, particularly London Overground on the North side of the city, are all over the place.
I was using firefox extension
Wow, hi all, I am Kirk, the author of this blogpost, never thought my small ARM board home server would handle this much traffic!

Currently reading through these posts, feel free to ask questions. Great to see interest.

FYI, I am quitting my postdoc job in two months to work on this full-time, which should help the rate of progress, but my main source of income will stop. We hav ea small but it will only cover a few months of full-time work.

If you want to support the project financially we have an Open Collective here: https://opencollective.com/fbrc/donate

We'd really appreciate any support you're able to give, which we'll use to push this open technology as far as we can! We are planning to start work on a much bigger stack after the kit.
we have been trying for 3 months to stop them invoicing us for services we no longer have - there is no one in BILLING ...they have let go of the DEPARTMENT...we are having to go legal...we think they are in difficulty and trying to max revenue before it all comes out.
Absolutely, it's my least favorite prototyping environment. It forces me to think about a bunch of stuff I don't want to think about up front.
I think the headline is incorrect. All items seem to be 2.9. 3.2 is less food and energy.
> Everything about Bitwarden is fine for a single, technical user, but it's not for sharing secrets with non-technical family members at any scale. It's just too clumsy with too many sharp edges.

I don't know. I guess it depends on what you compare it to. I've used Bitwarden in some pretty non-technical surroundings and it worked fine. Compared to a "single file" PW manager (like KeePass), I'd say it's still pretty easy to use within a team or group of "non-technical" users.

Granted, not as good as 1PW, but still a lot better than KeePass et al.
> it doesn't play well if you're using Literals instead of Enums as the discriminator type

The original example code with Enums doesn't type-check either, and for the same reason:

If the type checker allowed that, someone could take an object of type Foo, assign it to a variable of type _FrobulatedBase, then use that variable to modify the kind field to 'bar' and now you have an illegal Foo with kind 'bar'.