skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It sounds like you are tightly coupling to implementation and also expecting this to be the rightfully maligned ESB.

Airflow, aws step functions, etc are complex event processors and shouldn't typically be used as wide as you are suggesting.

It is a common pitfall to accidentally build distributed monoliths, and in fact often requires active architectural governance to avoid it.

Airflow isn't perfect, but I highly recommend considering a review on why modernization efforts fail.

The what and the how shouldn't be tightly coupled, especially across capabilities.

But yes. Airflow makes a poor ESB/DTC, but that is not the target for the project.
Oh, ok. I thought it's going to be about how to hold your pens properly, to avoid losing them.
Sampling 5 online dictionaries I am not seeing this nuance. Although sure, we can agree that a donation is a gift. In my opinion the actual nuance is that a donation is a gift driven by charitable intentions. A gift has broader connotations, like romance or celebration. A donation probably implies the gift is not driven by a personal connection to the receiver.
Looks great! One thing to consider would be adding some more specular lighting. Books in real life are shiny, and the render looks a bit flat.
Odysee Is Ditching Ads
Ah, I wasn't aware of Cloudflare's product of the same name - thanks!
I suspect we'll be hearing from her soon. She's not been shy about taking on anti-consumer monopoly behavior.
You have a typo in your first line, and I answered a sibling comment about that. Metrics are irrelevant to the discussion (and I presume you wanted to write "norm" instead of "metric").
Rust:

let results = foo
.into_iter()
.filter(|s| s.contains("banned"))
.collect::<Vec<&str>>();

C#:

var results = foo
.Where(s => s.Contains("banned"))
.ToArray();

Convenient, easy to understand and fast.
My trick is to make the objects "stand out". Black headphones, smartphones, keys etc are easily overlooked in work bag pockets or when placed on other dark surfaces.

I've greatly improved the "retrieval interval" of my phone since I've put it in a mint-green case instead of the standard black one. Same goes for my bluetooth headphone case, on which I applied reflective stickers.

Another trick is to group related objects. My office key card is in the cover of my work smart phone, so I have to look out for one item less each morning.
seriously, this is yet another case of "the beatings will continue until morale improves"
And yet so many people here seem to think that Apple doesn't have monopoly power, and doesn't abuse their market position.

Go figure.
Which is a lot more sensible use of AI if it involves, triage, routing and perhaps summarisation with a human ultimately handling the complaint
I quit ST over poor typescript support - did it get any better in recent versions?
Good idea. An image would have helped tremendously.
> Some history about Firefox and BeOS. Before Firefox, there was Mozilla, which had a BeOS port (called Bezilla). Bezilla was bloated and slow. So the BeOS community tried to make a stripped version of Mozilla with only the browser (minus all the bloat). This project became an inspiration to do the same for Mozilla...

I see no mention of that on the Firefox Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefox#History.
> correlation and causation are unrelated

This is incorrect (but what followed is correct).

You have extended the meaning of the phrase "correlation does not imply causation" to a stronger case[0]. The correct way to say this is that "correlation are not necessarily related."

The other way you might determine this was wrong is that ,,association''[2] always occurs when there is causation. So we have the classic A ⇒ B ⇏ B ⇒ A (A implies B does not imply B implies A), where ordering matters.

Last, we should reference Judea Pearl's Ladder of Causality[1].

[0] Another similar example was given to us by Rumsfield with respect to the Iraq WMD search. Where the error was changing "the absence of proof is not proof of absence" to the much stronger "the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence". It also illustrates why we might want to "nitpick" here https://archive.is/20140823194745/http://logbase2.blogspot.c...

[1] https://web.cs.ucla.edu/~kaoru/3-layer-causal-hierarchy.pdf

[2] Edit for clarity: The reason I (and Pearl) use the word "association" rather than "correlation" is because in statistics "correlation" often refers to linear relationship. So association clarifies that there is mutual information. There might be masked relationships, so non-linear. But if we are to use the standard vernacular of "correlation" (what most people think) then we could correctly say "causation implies correlation" (or more accurately, "causation implies correlation, but not necessarily linear correlation."). And of course, causation implies high mutual information, but high mutual information does not imply causation :) https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/26300/does-causati...
Entangled Photons Maintained Under New York Streets
Waymo's Chinese-made robotaxis face new headwinds thanks to Biden's tariffs
I'm not super familiar with this so I could be totally misreading this, but assuming those are operating under part 15 the answer to whether they are guaranteed to continue working seems to be explicitly "no" under NextNav's proposal:

>NextNav does, however, seek the removal of the current requirement that it not cause unacceptable levels of interference to part 15 devices. See Petition at A-6 (proposing to amend § 90.361), A-11 (proposing to add § 90.1410(c)).
iOS market share is near 60% in the US and a bit over 25% worldwide. They can't afford to leave that on the table.
Not it's biggest problem and before you think it's lack of killer app I would say it's form factor. Get that right and people wearing it more often and naturally the applications will come. Yea Meta onto this now with Rayban tie-up
I agree, this is literally what LORAN was/is for navigation (and we can and should build a better LORAN), and for time distribution WWVB and WWV already exist.
Concurrent index creation internally uses multiple transactions, so it can't itself be wrapped in a transaction.

The docs explain the mechanics further: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createindex.html...
There have been some instances where they have been 'about the content'-

The statements about chargebacks and porn were certainly true around 20 years ago, but that became less and less over time.
With how much that headset costs I will be buying a home theater that will rip the paint off the walls every time a bass hits, to make my solo movie experience "plain better".
There isn't a clear cut answer to this.

Lower population density does not necessarily equate to higher carbon footprint, especially when commuting downtown for work has been eliminated. Above a certain point density has diseconomies of scale of its own.

For example, if you are comparing, say, a three bedroom house in a large metropolitan area versus a four bedroom house in a small town, the reduced total driving time because driving distances are less in the small town (everything is in town, but town is tiny) can make up for a lot of efficiencies of scale.

The common argument is that we should put people into apartments instead, but that isn't always a clear total system win. For example if somebody is really into fishing letting them live near a lake with space to store their own boat will be more carbon efficient than stuffing them into an apartment where every weekend they drive to the storage place on the outskirts of town to pick their boat up, then drive three hours or so to the lake.
Buying the tools for the job is usually much cheaper than hiring a contractor to do the job.

For example, hiring a contractor to blow the leaves off your driveway a single time costs more than a leaf blower, and it takes 5 min to blow off your driveway, less time than it takes to pay the bill.
This looks very much like someone adding performance instructions and only paying attention to performance at the expense of security.

Likely an oversight rather than malicious intent.
> (individual numbers (0 dimensions), vectors (1 dimension), matrixes (2 dimensions), and so on)

You're using the word "dimension" in two (distinct) ways. Instead, use the word "rank":

> (individual numbers (0 rank), vectors (1 rank), matrixes (2 rank), and so on)

Now, we can talk about a 4-dimensional rank-1 tensor, e.g., a 4-element vector.

Now, think about a 4x4 matrix: if we multiply the matrix by a 4-vector, we get a 4-vector out: in some ways, the multiplication has "eaten" one of the ranks of the matrix; but, the dimension of the resulting object is the same. If we had a 3x2 matrix, and we multiplied it by a 3-vector, then both the rank has changed (from 2 to 1) and the dimension has changed (from 3 to 2).

A tensor has any number of rank.

More importantly, the ranks of a tensor come in two "flavors": a vector and a one-form. The concepts are pretty darn general, but one way to get a feel for how they're related is that the transpose of a vector can be its dual. This gets into things like pre- and post- multiplication; or, whether we 'covary' or 'contravary' with respect to the tensor.

Frankly, tensor products are a beast to deal with, mechanically, so the literature mostly deals with them as opaque objects. The modern tensor software libraries and high performance computing has seen a sea-change in the use of GR.
The lack of controllers make the Vision Pro poor for games; it can't handle even bog standard VR games like Beat Saber.
So basically, you're admitting that it is a ponzi scheme.

That "everyone's quality of life" is dependent on an ever increasing population.

And, 8 billion people isn't enough? What about 10 billion? 12 billion?

Every argument in favor of this ever increasing population is based on an imaginary structure called finance. While completely ignoring a physically real structure called nature.

At what point does the imaginary structure acknowledge it's impact on the real structure? What is the capitalist plan in identifying when the population is large enough, and instituting a transition at that point? The simple answer is of course, never. That's what makes it a ponzi scheme.

Even looking at historical trends doesn't support the argument that increased population supports "everyone's quality of life". The US population has approx. doubled in the last 50 years, and yet the economic position/buying power of almost all people have diminished in that same time. Instead all economic growth in that period has gone to the equity class, with no mitigation of this trend in sight.

This really brings us to the questions of: Who is "everybody"? and What constitutes their "quality of life"? Does another billion really improve Elon's?

There's more than enough prosperity, but it's very unequally distributed.

Apaparently heating the atmoshpere, melting the poles, clear cutting the rain forrests, extincting many species, depleting fresh water supplies, depleting soil fertility is all on the table, but spreading the wealth around so retiring old people can live indoors is absolutely not an option.
I worked in this space for a little under a year. There is lots of price fixing in apartment rentals, but it varies widely from city to city.

The place I worked had several different systems that relied on a number of tricks. One I remember off the top of my head would be used by property owners to signal price changes to one another through carefully crafted Craigslist apartment listings.
Yes, but that means you are forced to build EDA on top of Airflow, which may not be ideal for many cases. You are stuck managing your pools/workers within Airflow's paradigm, which means all workload must (a) be written in Python and (b) have Airflow installed on the venv (very heavy pkg) and (c) be k8s pod or Celery (unless you write your own).
> The Petition recognizes that there currently are unlicensed part 15 devices operating in the Lower 900 MHz Band, but it is unclear regarding the extent to which the proposed reconfiguration would impact potentially millions of such devices. With respect to part 15 devices, NextNav states that it is completing technical analyses and “will work with unlicensed users to understand their spectrum requirements.”

> NextNav does, however, seek the removal of the current requirement that it not cause unacceptable levels of interference to part 15 devices. See Petition at A-6 (proposing to amend § 90.361), A-11 (proposing to add § 90.1410(c)).
NextNav also states that updating the band to increase flexibility will not impact amateur users.

If you were really going to do the first part then surely you don't need to remove the no interference requirement, right? If the rule is "$new_thing can occupy this spectrum but it must not interfere with existing usages of the spectrum" then what's to discuss, it's a win-win? It seems like the FCC is doing what they need to and making them actually specify what is required to not interfere with existing users so it can be made part of the rule. So I guess I'll hold my breath and see what they come up with.
From Yudkowsky, according to the wikipedia article on the theory:

"When Roko posted about the Basilisk, I very foolishly yelled at him, called him an idiot, and then deleted the post. [...] Why I yelled at Roko: Because I was caught flatfooted in surprise, because I was indignant to the point of genuine emotional shock, at the concept that somebody who thought they'd invented a brilliant idea that would cause future AIs to torture people who had the thought, had promptly posted it to the public Internet"[1]

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roko%27s_basilisk
Liquid water in the Martian mid-crust
I don't know Google's Android policy for Patreon, but I expect it is or will soon be similar, if the inability to buy ebooks from the Android apps is any precedent.

Walled gardens suck.
Cleveland Clinic: Sugar Substitute Erythritol Raises Cardiovascular Risk
well done, super usefull
It's because it's an annoyance with ads and even if people want a free web to exist something something prisoners dilemma.

Also these ads are in videos even if you're e.g. paying for YouTube premium so it's not just the free web.
Can sponges be used as a capacitor for fluidics?
Keep it simple, use templates.

In fact, how amazing would it be if someone who was about to embark on yet another decentralized protocol fiasco instead just released a Patreon-like template? There are other payment providers.
I think there are AMD chips with twice as many cores as the Intel ones, so this kinda makes sense.
Apple is making a 3D movie for the device and coming out with more immersive experiences . Also, they are upgrading the OS with more features .

Which Apple device has Apple abandoned recently?
Another point that Patreon isn't really emphasizing here that seems relevant to any conversations about "fairness" is that Apple's fees on Patreon subscriptions in-app are now higher than Patreon's fees.

It's important to recognize any time that we're talking about the market that services charge what they can, not what is fair. The market does not have a concept of fairness, only competition. This is why there is no such thing as a benevolent monopoly that charges fair prices - because fairness does not exist in the market, only competition.

BUT... since fairness gets so often brought into conversations about Apple's fees, often with the implicit suggestion that Apple "deserves" to be compensated for all of the work they're putting into hosting and curating apps and for (in heavy quotes) "creating" a market that they supposedly also don't have duopoly control over: does anybody want to argue that Apple hosting the Patreon app on iOS provides more value to Patreon subscribers and creators than the existence of Patreon itself does?

Like, if we're going to talk about what's egregious and what's not egregious, charging higher fees per-transaction than the platforms you are hosting seems like it might be a good indicator that things have gotten out of control.
Startup Idea – Questions Teach Better
Cross-country hiring is done through B2B contracting even within Europe. Contractors send invoices and receive payments through regular wire transfers.
Daniel Shiffman has a fun neural network section in his (free online) book Nature of Code:

https://natureofcode.com/neural-networks/
Thanks for the insult. You could have decent instead of assuming I’m some nutcase.

I thought we weren’t using Soyuz anymore. I didn’t remember hearing about it and given the geopolitical situation that didn’t surprise me.

I’m not a major space buff who keeps up with all the launches and schedules. I thought I knew the current situation. I guess I was wrong.

A simple note that I was incorrect would have easily sufficed. I’d have thanked you for the info.
I'm happy to see an AMD with plenty of income that they can invest in the development of future products. We've seen how little advancement we get when Intel doesn't have effective competition to spur them along.
My friends are running a company called FOAM Space that has also put a lot of research into 3D terrestrial-base positioning [1]. Their system, though, can also make "claims" about the position, which is a cryptographic proof that the object that created the claim was at location X at time Y. So, not only you can find where you are but you can also you prove to others that you are there. They use unregulated LoRa bandwidths to operate.

[1] https://foam.space/

EDIT: typos
Huh, is a pill the only delivery system that works for that drug?
Welp. This sounds like me. Time to talk to my doctor. I’ve been nervous to.
I think it was the Go Marketing Team who decided to call it a boring language. "Boring" tested well for hyping the language.
I did a research project on this a while back - and when it comes to understanding deep network learning rate, regularization, hidden layer effects, and activations, I don't think anything is better than [this little web app](https://playground.tensorflow.org/#activation=tanh&batchSize...)
And also the recessive policies come out in the open in front of the world from people like the ones who created "operation chokepoint", who are perhaps not help us as being super 'socially conservative'.

Your choice of entertainment, information and tools is under attack from all sides when they can get away with it.
One really cool feature of the quick copy mode is that if you do the uppercase version of the letters it will automatically paste the value back into the terminal prompt.
What kind of analytics can you do with the data? I see a dashboard mentioned, but I wonder if there are more views.
Free upgrades are problematic themselves: once you've saturated your market (a good place to be, right?) you no longer have income to provide upgrades.
My point is the same for int as for vector<int>. There is 0 difference in the C++ calling convention between passing a vector<int> and a vector<int>: they both copy an object of the parameter type. Of course, copying a 1000 element vector is much slower than copying a single pointer, but the difference is strictly the size of the type. The copying occurs the same way regardless. This is also the reason foo(char) is less overhead than a foo(char).

Everything (except reference types) is pass-by-value, but of course values can have wildly different sizes.

Also, the problem of accidentally copying large structs is not limited to arguments, the same considerations are important for assignments. Another reason why "pass-by-pointer" shouldn't be presented as some special thing, it's just passing a pointer copy.
For a while I kinda wanted to buy a used Buick Reatta as a project car because it had the same CRT touchscreen technology. It's extremely cool if you're into the 80s retro futuristic vibe.
> In Philadelphia, city officials acknowledged the return-to-office decision wasn't driven by concerns about productivity. Rather, it was in pursuit of what they called a leadership philosophy.

If there is a silver lining then how the prevailing reasons for mandatory office work are increasingly revealed to be bullshit, forcing higher-ups to admit that this hasn't anything to do with productivity.
>why can't you hire help out of pre-tax income, like any other business can

Leaving aside the obvious fact that your personal activities are not a business[0], you can indeed hire help out of pre-tax income -- in the U.S. no one pays income tax on their gross income, only their taxable income. By the time common tax credits are factored in, a married couple with children may easily have $30-40K of gross income each year not subject to income tax.

Many, if not most, homeowners do not need to go out and work extra hours to pay someone to do work to repair their property, any more than they need to work extra hours to pay for food and clothing, so looking only at the marginal tax rate is misleading (as in the example above of earning an extra $167 to have $100 after tax).

Further, work you pay for that improves the property (as opposed to repairs) is added to the tax basis of the property, reducing future taxable income when the property is sold. Along with the potential to exclude up to $250K/$500K (single/married) of gain[1] from selling the property is a huge source of pre-tax income.

[0]and even businesses can only deduct expenses for people they hire for services that are related to generating a profit.

[1]Section 121 exclusion
I have to agree. If I have to decide between no covid + RTO vs covid + WFH, well, the second is it.
Several people here are saying something like "Life is too short to be miserable. Get out and be happy."

I tried that. In the span of a month we had a newborn, I lost my job, the market went into the worst recession since the Great Depression. Later I lost another job and we had to short-sell our house.

We got a divorce and it wasn't because of any of those things (though, they did influence it). It was because my default was to run away from my problems.

Funny thing; the divorce didn't eliminate the stress. It just moved it around in my body and mind and led to near constant anger, anxiety, and panic spasms. I went to see a therapist who taught me to be present with what I'm feeling. (He practiced Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, for anyone interested) I did that in earnest and one day about six months after starting therapy I realized what a mistake I had made in giving up on my marriage.

I reached out and we were able to repair the relationship and we've been back together for over ten years now, thankfully. We're closer than ever. I don't recommend that particular method of repairing a relationship, by the way. ;)

It hasn't always been easy since we got back together but, it has been worth it. We were talking the other day--we talk a lot, important!--and we both agreed that at the start of our relationship, our feelings for each other were very intense. Now that we've been together for over twenty years (with a short "We were on a break!" in the middle) we find that the intensity of our love for each other isn't the same but it is so much deeper than it was at the start and only grows more so the more we're together. We realized that you can only get that if you stay and work on the relationship.
Canceling subscriptions should be as easy as signing up – proposed federal rule
we're working on this right now - I don't know if we'll get it out for today, but it will certainly be available this week