skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Automotive has a similar standard called ISO 26262. ISO-26262-6 is closest to DO-178B, though ISO-21448 is also highly relevant. Both are widely used throughout the industry, including Waymo. The norm in the US is self-certification. European homologation generally requires third party certification, and Waymo is almost certainly in that process right now, as part of their discussions with European regulators.
Gitlab went public October 14th, 2021.

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/GTLB/

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33208536

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28863993
I recently found out that "/vouched?id=<your_userID>" also works.
Oh, yeah. If you do manage to control schema drift by back porting, PostgreSQL will pick consistent names. But you can still trip over the inherent race condition there if you don't specify names explicitly. We always considered automatic naming to be a shortcut, and used explicit names matching our internal naming conventions when creating and landing patches.

I would snapshot the entire production schema every month or two with pg_dump and back port it into the dev tree, precisely to catch any unintended drift such as differences in naming, triggers, indexes etc. that fell between the cracks.
I love how Taleb managed to translate an ideal from stoic philosophy into a precisely defined mathematical concept
Why would the qualified people who desire to work in that location and have better options suddenly work for the government. If the idea is to train non-experienced people that's what Boeing did. What is going to prevent them for leaving for other local work that pays better once they have some experience.

What the government should have done is reduce their pay for missing deadlines by having milestones in the contract. At that point paying more makes economic sense and wages would rise.
I had to use apng a while back and it was surprisingly difficult to generate one that worked well. I forget if we kept it long term, it was janky as heck. I don’t believe webp was as widely supported at the time either which might have been easier.
Then instead of comparing non-pro-athlete me with The Rock, let's pick some professional runner or cyclist.
both unity and unreal have GC these days.
I’m Canadian and moved to UK 5 years ago. I’m experiencing significantly lower cost of living, comparatively affordable housing, higher salaries, much more dynamic economy and better employment opportunities, vastly better healthcare system and social services, better support for immigrants, understandable and accessible government services and in general a far more caring and cohesive culture. All this for no more than I was paying in taxes in Canada.
I use it to add window snapping to macos:

https://gist.github.com/spartanatreyu/850788a0441e1c5565668a...
> Why does patreon need its own app? Why can't it just be web based?

Apple & Google Pay is my guess. Which I don't use, just because it's rent seeking and leads to this.

I use the websites. Don't want to install bloody apps which request every permission available. My browser has most of those set to denied. Don't even ask for permission, outright deny.
All investment must be recouped, even in a purchase. 8B is a proud sum and it'll be attempted to be extracted from the users first. This is the beginning of the end, as we have seen over and over again.
AI isn't being marketed to consumers. AI is being marketed to investors. Regardless of whether or not it boosts sales, so long as it keeps driving up the stock price, they'll keep tossing around the word AI.
MDMA triggers very bad depression wouldn't recommend it

I think marijuana is a better alternative to MDMA

All in all I reject taking any drugs now.

Just exercise and meditation to feel stoned.

The mind is powerful, use it, don't use chemicals!
It's because the car is contract-manufactured by Magna and they came to a convenient agreement to get thousands of white cars with extra holes.
I’ve been a renter my whole adult life and never had an inspection like that.
> Nothing should be given away forever.

Government should auction all property (land plots) every 10 years too?
As the sibling comment points out, the government doesn't need a subpoena if companies hand over the data willingly (typically for a fee.)

I can't see this being fixed until America decides that the rights to our identifying data can't be signed away.
Great to see these UserLand Radio Blogs are still hosted all these years later. Dave Winer (and I am sure others) obviously worked to see that happen.
Genuine question, how does AGPL restrict use? From my reading of it, it is only ensuring that any modifications to the source code must be made available if you "distribute" the software, where distribution now includes hosting it as a service.

It seems more or less in the original spirit of GPLv2 but updated for a SaaS driven world. If you consider v3 restrictive then you must also consider v2 restrictive, just in a more narrow way.
DHH: Cant believe I kept myself from Linux, Neovim, and mech keyboards this long
They can't say it replaces a computer until it does full generic computing. Until then it replaces a monitor maybe.

Come on people, full 3d world where there are pipes representing all the IPC and network connections, random arbitrary switches and buttons you can hook up to automation scripts, unlimited windows you can program how they are created / moved/ and managed and manipulated. for ALL operating systems, not reinventing the damn wheel for every operating system. This will never be in ubiquitous use unless it does universal generic OS interface
yeah gotta use an IDE for that
I find these lawsuits despicable. Imagine being a hard working stressed out small business owner working long hours on low margins, only to have some busybody or predatory law firm try to end your lifeline. These plaintiffs need to PAY for the conveniences they think they’re entitled to. Sorry but life isn’t always fair and everyone has difficulties. And not everyone is a pawn at a big megacorp that can afford to comply with these laws. These frivolous lawsuits indicate the law needs to be changed and it should be done retroactively with fines for these predatory law firms.
I would make a cash bet with anyone who wants it that by, say, 2050, barring some major singular catastrophe like a nuclear war, a supervolcano or an asteroid event, the metrics of environmental and human well-being globally will be better than they are today, and that we also adapt with only modest, possibly even minimal suffering (demonstrable by solid evidence of a causal chain) from the warming we've already caused and likely will continue to cause in the intervening decades.

Climate change has its dangers, but it's not and need to be an extinction level catastrophe on the scale that much of the hive-minded preening, fetishism and virtue signalling here likes to claim in the comments. It's largely a gradual process that our extremely adaptive and innovative species will adjust to, just as it has to many other changes in history with far fewer technological and social resources at its disposal.

Also, the arguments about individual people feeling guilty for not doing their small part to effect global change on greenhouse gas output are idiotic. They're a misguided deviation of blame against those who it's easiest to browbeat for the sake of feeling morally superior (one's neighbors, friends, family and so forth) with no realistic mechanism for turning such brow-beating into a meaningful global change.

Historically, the big sea changes in social habits have been brought about by specific, personally and measurably visible incentives to adapt those changes, either positive or negative. If people and their societies will behave differently for the sake of mitigating global warming, they'd need the same sort of incentive structure, or a personally beneficial willingness to wide adaption of real, beneficial innovations which reduce some aspect of our environmental impact. Urbanization and industrialized agriculture are two imperfect but usable examples of this. Both reduce our destructive footprint to smaller percentages of the world's surface, and both happen because concrete self-interest, measurable on an individual level, drives them.
It's kind of a poisoned well situation. Whoever would purchase them would lead to the departure of many disgruntled users who basically were with Gitlab to stick it to Microsoft.

I've also never felt compelled to use Gitlab. They literally offer no significant advantage other than being an alternative to Github.

If I started over, I'd go with Drew's Sourcehut hub for the sake of actually shooting for something different.

I don't really see who would pay $8B for this business which has no moat-future.
That seems backwards to me, short commands should be where users place their daily workflow of aliases. Longer names should be where the kind of static, shell scripting "API" sits. Imagine a world where we could set 'mv' and 'ls' to something other than the `mv` and `ls` binaries without breaking our systems...
> if I asked you for the password to your HN account you probably wouldn't tell me, because it's a secret - and that doesn't make you evil.

I would tell you, but I would ask you why you wanted it first.

There's no inherent need for us to have passwords. If people were always good then I would have no need for a password on this account. The login could just be "username" and one could assume that no one would pose as someone else.

> Secrecy is necessary for privacy, and you can find plenty of essays defending privacy rights.

I think "privacy rights" are completely redundant if one has property rights. If I have property rights on my home, there's no need for additional "privacy rights".
>but death isn't a system

death is entropy. do you know of a system without entropy?

>or organism...

boy are you going to be surprised when you answer that knock on the door, eh?
Well, EC2 is a type of VPS.
Homebrew is always the first choice to me.

I am mainly with JS tech stack for years and play around Python from time to time - My set up in my machine is iterm2 + Oh-My-Zsh(theme) + plugins(e.g. autoJump & zsh Autosuggestions). I cant live without Autosuggestions in my terminal.
agree all but perl, I found perl hard to write and hard to read
I am quite curious about your approach, Do you have an example code somewhere?
Very cool, but I'm surprised you're sharing this on here and not in a job interview with a deep learning startup and/or an arXiv paper.
TikTok suppresses anti-China content on the platform across the world
> Every programmer worth their salt must learn Perl, Bash and using these command line utils.

Naw. As a game and VR programmer I only barely need to acknowledge that POSIX exists. These tools are not even Top 100 in usefulness.
Texas builds clean power – but it isn't a climate champion
I'm willing to bet the user you quoted isn't running for any sort of election.
The spirit is different.
Women have periods, pregnancy and menopause. Our entire lives have been shaped by this journey we were meant to make. It’s our design. That’s what defines women. That’s our identity.

The opposite binary and other uncategorised versions are not the default female.

The genders are not equal. I lost my farm after 12 years because I was in ‘violation of farm management policy’ because I didn’t follow their list of 6 different PTO implement.

As a female, I don’t have the upper body strength to operate and change all those PTO implements. I spent not a small amount to fabricate and fashion my own small implement that was originally imported from Italy.

And yet.. even though my design was better..I was constantly compared to male farmers .. “why are you not following their methods and same equipment as the dudes? Well..because I have breasts, shorter arms and lesser upper body strength, you idiots!”

And this was the State of California public agency that controlled my land access that I lost and subsequently lost my farm due to lack of land access.

I am particularly depressed now because there is no way I expect a fair hearing ..the world has gone mad. Daft as a drunk duck, I am telling you.. and it’s just depressing. They have stolen 12 years of my life and my work(I was working on automating my farm equipment) because I am not a man.

I don’t want to be equal to a man. I want to be myself. I empathize with those training for female sports. We can’t win anywhere. Soon we will only be relegated for one job..for the one thing only we can do..and what only we possess: wombs. I don’t even want to live in this world anymore.
Obligatory 22 Jump Street: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qxJ6bznkNI
Don't think there is anything wrong with appreciating or buying historical artifacts, Nazi memorabilia included. There was even a point when many Americans brought over Nazi artifacts, sold, and trade it to this day without any affiliation or appreciation for Nazi ideology, if anything it helps us preserve human history.
Yesterday, he posted on Reddit and I expressed some concern with the benchmarks. The benchmarks are claiming 0.36 ns of overhead per call, but only the computing function. There is a second thread running doing the schedule that the overhead numbers don't include. It seems pretty clear he's running on a hyperthreaded 8 core machine (so 16 threads), I was guessing 3 Ghz, so that literally a single cycle of overhead.

Each extra thread adds more overhead from lock contention. At 16 threads overhead is up to 3.6 ns (so 10 times more). I'm guessing, but that would mean the 0.36 ns of overhead included an uncontested lock? That's not possible. There's some other weirdness going on in the benchmark data too. So either I'm not understanding what he's actually timing or maybe there is a bug in the benchmark code.

Also, if you multiply all the values out, I think he's timing in milliseconds (when runtime is calculated and converted to millis, they come out as whole numbers). Don't most benchmarkers have better precision than that? Maybe he's just using `time prog` and the data is just really dirty. Or maybe he's just choosing really, really bad metrics that totally useless for this (this is probably correct, just not sure if there are more issues).
The leading three authors are from Germany, Mexico, and Switzerland resptfully.

The sentence they want should capture the notion of being robust when poked with a stick.

A pencil on it's tip is a fragile system, one burp and it falls to the table, far from the intial state. Marbles in fruit bowls are anti-fragile, given a good shake (up to a threshold) and they remain in the bowl and return to the low centre.

Reading further, they want more; that repeated perturbations should deliver benefit, that systems in an warped egg carton configuration can be annealed to reveal an optimal point by vigorous shaking slowly reduced in degree.

Having now read the whole paper it doesn't seem novel wrt to the state of dynamic system discussions in the mid 1980s other than the insertion of "antifragility" as nomenclature into the mix.
Ironically, that sentence is pretty plain for a dynamics and control paper lol
Phew, old times, I had to solve this with a crafty solution using Flash back in the day.

(Un)surprised to know this is still an issue in 2024.
Yes, I know what the word means in the standard sense. The point was that it doesn’t have a separate meaning in philosophy the way modern philosophy does.

Or in art, where modern art doesn’t mean “art of today” but instead “art of roughly 1880-1960.”
> Are you implying that cryptography is evil?

I am open to the possibility that it is. I am not sure. For cryptography, my gut says 80% odds not evil, 20% odds evil, but that's after putting very little thought into it.

I certainly know cryptography is used for quite a lot of evil.

Is it used for good things? Perhaps it is always a suboptimal solution.

These are good questions. Thank you.
As DevOps engineer I've used and managed both Gitlab and Github extensively, and Gitlab is just so much better. Things make sense there. Shame that it's so darn expensive.
The whole conversation is very scope dependent. A species can be antifragile specifically because the constituent organisms are fragile. The species evolves not in spite of death and mutation (variation) of the organisms but because of it.

At the same time organisms themselves can be antifragile at a different scope. My body gets stronger when I stress the muscles, and gets weaker when I do not.

Edit to add… it is also very dose dependent. Zero muscle stress and I get weaker. Some and I get strong. Too much and I get rhabdomyolysis — an absorbing barrier.

Same goes for the species. No death means no evolution. Some means evolution. Extinction level deaths are an absorbing barrier.
I can just imagine someone inside Docker, inc. saying “the name is not important” or over and over again until one day they ship it. They’ll never know what they missed out on.
There's so much rolling shutter in the main picture shown, it's clearly not high speed. The 30fps video from twitter makes the winner more obvious.
Exactly. Marketing dollars come from investors. A big part of modern marketing for startups is spending tons of investor money to "grow" quickly. How long the fire burns doesn't matter, it's all about throwing dried out February Christmas trees onto the flames for quick bursts of flame.
As someone who saw the DoJ and some European regulation authorities in the 90s it is bonkers to see how Apple operates ruthlessly in their ecosystem and how the regulators are sleeping in the wheel about how harmful this company is to the creativity industry (e.g. indie games, creators, etc).
If you think for one second they are going to do "students night" where students can actually afford to eat... instead of milk every last cent of extra profit from every eye twitch and craving glare then you have no idea how capitalism works
The funniest thing about HTTPS is that its transition/enforcement exposed a lot of people who don’t understand why we need HTTPS everywhere, even if there are no logins (!!!)

To this day, if you open Twitter, Facebook Groups or Discord, you’ll find people complaining about Google forcing HTTPS down people’s throat.
> They literally offer no significant advantage other than being an alternative to Github.

While I agree with most of your point, I'd suggest that being self-hosted is a fairly major draw for a certain group of people. There's a lot of overlap with the anti-MS cohort, but it's not exclusive. Most of the uses I've seen of GitLab in companies is those who stick it on a cheap VM and never pay for it.

GitHub has had a self-hosted offering in the past, the current availability is... cloudy, looks discontinued, they're trying to move people back online. It was always way more expensive though, targeting a completely different market to GitLab self-hosting.
“Vanity Fair” lol
I had a bit FOMO not using TMUX. But WezTerm and a handful of keybindings for creating tabs, panes, new windows and moving around solved that for me.
Amen. I was unreasonably opposed to TypeScript at first after lots of bad experiences with messy JavaScript when I was first learning development - but after immersing myself in it for a year or so at $NEW_JOB, I absolutely love it. The only ways in which I can see that Go outperforms TypeScript is in performance, but frankly I don't care and most developers shouldn't - unless you're writing truly low-level high-performance utilities, you should (within reason) bias for being able to write (and iterate) fast over being able to execute fast. You can always re-write in Rust if you find that performance is a bottleneck.
> Can you explain why you think they're evil now? That seems like an awfully strong position.

I have been working on a long form essay on this for months. It has not fully annealed in my mind yet.

But right now, heuristics leads me to think they are evil.

I can think of so many times where I and people I care about have been harmed by secrets (some fatal). I can't think of a single case where I was helped by someone keeping a secret.
Your comment was clear about mocks, but not why mocks are relevant to the topic at hand. The original comment was equally clear that it was in reference to where there is only one implementation. In fact, just to make sure you didn't overlook that bit amid the other words, the author extracted that segment out into a secondary comment about that and that alone.

Mocks, by definition, are always a supplemental implementation – in other words, where there is two or more implementations. What you failed to make clear is why you would bring up mocks at all. Where is the relevance in a discussion about single implementations the other commenter has observed? I wondered if you had missed (twice!) the "one implementation" part, but it seems you deny that, making this ordeal even stranger.
You can use apple and google pay on normal websites that have it set up.
Because government jobs are secure, Boeing subcontractor jobs where you are a cheap disposal cog are not. If you don’t see the value in security to someone making $20-$40/hr who needs healthcare benefits, you might start there.

A union fixes this in the long term, but that will take time. Government can employ rapidly. Something, quickly, needs to change before we forget how to build because MBAs, accountants, and lawyers burned the place down for shareholder value. There are two astronauts stuck in space very publicly demonstrating this.
Needing to cast nil to a type was weird. C/C++/Java/Python don't do that.

They also take on the weird Java-ish culture that everything is better if it's written in Go.

They also had this weird take on the C++ vtable, so they eschewed anything class like to keep everything statically linked for speed.

It also took them a long time to figure out their loop variable syntax was broken. So ... hrm.
Maybe s/he doesn't want to waste their time doing that and instead the company is politely signaling to their users that they're being charged junk fees by continuing to use the iOS app. Which is quite fair and transparent behaviour. Why take on Apple when you can correctly inform your users and push them to give Apple the boot?
Running a program, as a service or not, isn't redistribution. It is use.

The original spirit of the GPL is about identifying people doing bad things we don't like and trying to prevent them. All those bad things have to do with redistribution, not with using the program.

The AGPL is still about identifying people doing bad things we don't like, except now those people are just running the program.

This is no different from Adobe, Apple, Microsoft, ... identifying people using their software in ways they don't like, and crafting their EULA terms to turn those activities into a license violation.

A free software license simply cannot dictate uses, like where and how you run the program, and who can access it from where.

A free software license can only use copyright law, and only be concerned with copying.

EULAs go beyond coypright; they try to connect non-copying activities to copyright by the doctrine that if the user engages in the forbidden activities, their license is terminated (and thus it becomes copyright infringement for them to continue to have a now unlicensed copy of the software).
Why are you so determined to make the gamepad mean something? Is it not enough that the whole design of the sub was fundamentally flawed?

Anyway, the best sense I can make of your logic is that designedByStudents -> gamepad, and designedByStudents -> negligence, therefore gamepad -> negligence. In that case I believe your fallacy is "affirming the consequent", with a side of ad populum w.r.t other submarines. I don't see how changing the type of controller fits in.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_the_consequent