skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
https://archive.ph/OBGWm
>I can't customise basic things and the Phone app (you know, the main use of a phone) takes 30s to open

I can't even remember the last time I used the actual voice calling function on my phone. It's probably been a couple of years now.
Right. If you have systems that can adapt to stimulus in ways to prepare for recurring stimulus, you can look like this antifragile system. If the answer is to just be bigger... It is not a compelling model.

So building your immunity by using low doses doesn't mean you are antifragile. It means you are trainable. And even then, you are within tolerance levels. And cannot ever withstand some poisons.

Indeed, training is largely rehearsing some specific stimulus to be ready for it in a non training environment. We don't think of athletes as antifragile, though. Do we?
Interesting. Any hypotheses as to why this shift happened?
I’m guessing it’s the cubits that gave pause more than the restriction. I first became aware of eruvim thanks to an article in the L.A. Times which talked about a new eruv being constructed in Venice. The article talked about the restriction on carrying and how the eruv allowed congregants to bring their keys¹ with them while attending synagogue.

⸻

1. Doubtless someone reading this is thinking, well, they could just get an electronic lock and use that to protect their homes but most Orthodox rabbis would prohibit this as there is the possibility of a spark being created by the electronic system² which would violate the prohibition on making a fire on the Sabbath.

2. This question comes up in Surely You’re Joking Mr Feynman, where Richard Feynman, asked about this by rabbinical students, told them that electricity was not fire and that a condenser across the switch would eliminate any potential spark, but they were unsatisfied with his answer.
Same reason I left Chemistry. Gotta grind for 80 hours a week for a decade for a chance at a good position. And hope you don’t get stuck under a PI that steals all the credit.
Overseas trade supplying horses for sacrifices during the late Viking age
I am a big fan of xkcd and this is one of my favorite creation of his.

With this said, this chart is good to compare things that are close to each other but does not work that week IMO when comparing items that are really different.

It is more the path between, say, a dental x-ray and the yearly background dose that tells us "they are really different"

Again, the chart is great but I would maybe have preferred something visually closer to a sankey (but I did not give much thought about that).

OTOH fitting all this information and having a readable graph is a miracle Randall is a master of.
I've screenshot an amazing response by GPT-4 on a team Slack. Basically, I took a screenshot of a frustrating error, gave it some code, and it would find the error from an opaque message. 6 months later, it was impossible to replicate. Seems foolproof evidence to me.

We also have a side-by-side UAT comparison of Claude Sonnet 3 and Sonnet 3.5 where 3.5 tends to make wrong assumptions and yet more likely to flag itself as unsure and asking more questions. It could be a problem with our instructions more than the model itself.

There's been a lot of gaslighting from the OpenAI community though. The Claude community at least acknowledge them and encourages people to report them.

Some of the overactive rejections on Claude is related to the different prompts used in Artifacts. 3.5 is also a lot stricter with instructions.

If you want something that doesn't change, use open source.
That “proof” is merely people that hated Chevron calling it a zombie.
So fairly removed from heart rate? Can I assume I'm not going to hard if I recover rather quickly?
Whatever I watch==top tech reviewer, apparently.
The "equivalent" you mention is more like the opposite rather than the equivalent. It's making a sweeping generalization about millions of software engineers using 1 counterexample pertaining to one specific company, completely ignoring the impact the millions of other people have had through that practice. Extrapolating from a highly-non-random team of (say) ~100 engineers to a population of 4+ million is just a baseless thing to do.

SCOTUS is the exact opposite of this. It has a whopping 9 members, all of whom directly influence every single decision -- which is published publicly. There is no other member of the population to extrapolate to (vs. the millions in the SWE case); you just have to extrapolate temporally... for which you have plenty of history to base things on. Making sweeping generalizations about how the majority of them operate is as close to the exact opposite of baseless as it could possibly be.

Maybe you're right regardless and the parent is "not even wrong" nonetheless; I'm not opining on that conclusion one way or the other. I'm just saying your attempt at an analogy arguing for that is very much not making a case for it.
You know an ounce of prevention is worth a ton of cure... maybe upsetting the petrochemical pharmaceutical agribusiness industry about exposing so many people to high levels of mutagenic carcinogens should be higher on the priority list - but then a certain proportion of brainwashed zombies would have mental health crises over the fact they'd been lied to all their lives, oh dear. Gotta protect the mental health of the herd, before they're trotted off to the slaughter.
Sorry, but not really. If you know what you do, you don't just pick an LLM. LLMs are trained/built for a specific task: text generation. Other models are trained on different tasks. If you know what you do, you compare models (I don't mean LLM models with that!) and choose the best performing. Just because LLMs receive more training doesn't mean they have a better performance. Very weird and flawed way of thinking. This is just hype thinking
Those are good questions, and seem pretty relevant. It'd be good to have them clarified.

158M members certainly seems enough for a class action. :)
Why is it worse?

Samsung's experience is objectively more customizable (you can have custom color schemes, custom keyboard layouts, macros and more).

At the same time, samsung defaults have neutral design, while google screams at You "this is a google app" almost everywhere.

I guess the only downside is that samsung's UIX is heavier on the performance side, but in context of flagships it doesn't matter much.

So again, what makes you say pixels experience is better?
> In all this, the NYT evidently punted on the value judgment. Instead of one canonical weighting, they gave us the two-dimensional sprawl of all possible weightings

They didn’t quite punt. They did pick an ordering for showing the countries from left to right.
how to approach marketing as a tech founder, any books/resources/courses?
That's a fair point. I looked at the websites of some other malls and it does seem like Disney has gone "above and beyond" to re-publish the menu in its entirety on their website, where other malls would just link to the lessee's website for that purpose.

However, I have now checked the Wayback Machine to see what the website looked like[1] in September 2023 (before the death in October 2023), and honestly even if Disney themselves produced this menu content (which does not seem to be what the plaintiff is claiming), then it still feels like the plaintiff has misrepresented what was on this website. Specifically the plaintiff says that the menu claimed items were "allergen-free", when in actuality the disclaimer specifically says the restaurant does not claim that.

Copying the relevant section from the end of the menu:

> About our allergy-friendly menu items: Guests may consult with a chef or special diets trained Cast Member before placing an order. We use reasonable efforts in our sourcing, preparation and handling procedures to avoid the introduction of the named allergens into allergy-friendly menu choices. While we take steps to prevent cross-contact, we do not have separate allergy-friendly kitchens and are unable to guarantee that a menu item is completely free of allergens. Allergy-friendly offerings are reliant on supplier ingredient labels. We cannot guarantee the accuracy of the contents of each food item. Allergen advisory statements (e.g., "may contain") are not regulated and therefore not taken into consideration when developing allergy-friendly meals. It is ultimately our Guests' discretion to make an informed choice based upon their individual dietary needs.

> Menu items and prices are subject to change without notice.

> * Consuming raw or undercooked meats, poultry, seafood, shellfish, or eggs may increase your risk of foodborne illness.

> Our plant-based menu items are made without animal meat, dairy, eggs and honey.

[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20230922075713/https://www.disne...
Are you intentionally ignoring the part where I provided reasons for why alternatives to the use of password managers by vendors that (supposedly) cause lock-in won’t go away?

It turns your fear into a hypothetical that you’re more than welcome to discuss but imo it’s disingenuous to frame it as the incredibly big problem you’re framing it as.
If the benefits and wages were so much better than "boring office jobs" then why would there be a teacher shortage in the absence of onerous requirements for entry? Why is there a teacher shortage if the pay and benefits are so good?
They’re measuring individual photons, right? I’m old enough to remember modems slower than that. No doubt they will get faster, but what if they were used only for (say) key exchange?
How is that any different from a password manager? Instead of being beholden to LastPass I'm beholden to the manufacturer of my laptop and my phone, until I get a new one at which point I just transfer the passkey over to that. I don't see the problem.
I completely agree with you. To me a good architect is someone who enhances software developers and if not mentors them then guides them in the same direction. Unfortunately there are simply so many barriers in the way of this ever becoming an actual option in most organisations.

You'll need this unicorn situation where you have architects with very good social, communication and change management skills who are also technical apt and very good at dealing with "developers". I put developers in quotes because if we're honest with ourselves we all know that we're probably one of the most unmanageable groups of employees out there. This is the easy part. The hard part is to find an organisation which will give your architects and software developers the time they need to actually perform this sort of work, and, you need IT management with clear role definitions so it doesn't end up in a confusing mess where nobody really knows who can decide anything.

Since this rarely happens, most architects either become managers or go back to being developers leaving only the people who actually enjoy the "process" more than "results" being long time architects. Obviously not in 100% of the cases, but in most of them. There is nothing I personally dislike more than "process" people. I used to think of them as an unecessary evil that I just didn't understand, but then Covid happened while I was working in a 6000 employee organisation. Virtually every one of our "process" people was unable of doing any sort of work for 9 months, and during those 9 months our production and employee happiness sky-rocketed across every field. Well... happiness didn't increase for middle managers or "process" people, but...
>samsungs bloatware

How is it any different then google's bloatware?
Ongoing phishing campaign hosted on Cloudflare workers
I guess I should go check if I can unlock my (regular lock) bathroom door from outside!

> Deadbolting a bathroom is also pointless - there is nothing to protect.

Pedantically, many people keep medicines in their bathroom and if you happen to have any recreationally-usable drugs, they'd be one of the first things to go in a lot of robberies. Or, sadly, be taken by your teenager or seemed-to-be-normal friend.
There are clear differences. [Let's say I am not a competitor and Amazonifying them] I can keep using a permissively licensed software or a fork of it at the moment they pull the rug and keep using it in the same manner; I just don't get future updates. I cannot fork AGPL and use it commercially in any reasonable manner.

Even worse, let's say I am a paid customer for their support and run on their proprietary license. Once they rug pull or jack up the prices or whatever, I cannot fall back to AGPL hosted locally. If it were permissive I would have had other options.

AGPL I fully respect as Free Software. AGPL+CLA, however, is not your friend and is pure deception. If you are a sufficiently large commercial entity, you are probably wise to act as if it is proprietary. In fact, it might be slightly worse as folks are sometimes cavalier in accepting contributions without proper copyright license/assignment and they pass them on to you under their paid license and expose you to some risk.
Anyone doing business with Disney should cancel their D+ subscription and pay an attorney to properly notify Disney Corp. that the terms of The Agreement no longer apply. Indeed, this step should be taken by sub-contractors, anyone visiting the parks, anyone who could conceivably have contact with the parks, the movie studios, the corporate HQ, any suppliers or subcontractors, or anyone working for any of the above. This move is abhorrent, and if the judge buys it, it is dystopian.
I used to be one of these and honestly I'm so tired of Google as a company lately I'm really considering jumping over to Apple's ecosystem.

Google just have an incredibly weak product team, across both hardware and software.
I'm wondering how diet is not mentioned as a possible culprit. They say that nobody really knows what's the cause, but looking around there aren't many studies.

I'd be surprised if diet didn't play a major role in this.

Looking for studies on diet I indeed couldn't find any study that really looked at the diets of people with pineal gland calcification.

But the article mentions two things.

1. Calcification can occur in the cardiovascular system as well

2. The pineal gland is not protected by the blood brain barrier

Together this suggest to me that if something causes CV calcification it may do the same to the pineal gland.

At least for cardiovascular calcification there seem to be dietary measures that one can use: "In terms of a dietary programme, these recommendations indicate avoiding sugar and the transfats and preservatives found in processed foods and drinks and adopting a diet high in oily fish and vegetables. The micronutrients magnesium and vitamin K may be worthy of further investigation as a treatment option for CV calcification."

[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4425113/
Tsmc is manufacturer, but whose design will they be using?
Smash: Smash Together Files! Probably JavaScript
One hack though is to drag out proceedings to cause additional cost, which a judge can limit but not entirely avoid.
I know it’s not the point of your example, but you should not check if a file exists right before opening it. It could get deleted in between exists(file) and open(file), so you still have to handle the case where opening fails with FileNotFound.
That's why people aim for the legal costs to be commensurate with the possible gain they will miss out on. Many corporate penalties are small enough that mathematically, it's absolutely worth simply breaking the law all the time.
Because if not for a free speech issue you can have market access, today.
0.xxx... is just a notation for certain fractions (specifically, the fraction x/9). If we set x = 9, then the notation 0.9999... is just a notation for 9/9 = 1. So it's just a silly notation for 1.
Let Intel and ARM be Intel and ARM. Investors can diversify or hedge without Intel’s help.
Your definition slightly off. Here it is from the guy who coined the term:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/01/21/potemkin-ai/#hey-guys

> Here is how platforms die: first, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die.

Removing features is absolutely part of enshittification.
The article states that tickets haven't been used. That's not where the restaurant was.
The 14900ks and ryzen 7950 can basically turbo way over 253w as long as the chip stays cool. Both chips have two (or more?) eco modes.
It’s actually super silly. Because the 125w mode is actually most often good enough
> I can keep using a permissively licensed software or a fork of it at the moment they pull the rug and keep using it in the same manner; I just don't get future updates.

That part is exactly the same under AGPL, no?
Numtu: AI with its own email
Hey guys, I'm on a quest to figure out how we can best utilize AI in our workflows and I'm making a bet integrating it with email could unlock a lot of productivity - especially for people who are not that tech savvy.

Working on a prototype right now but wanted to see if anyone was interested collaborating over this!
“Pay yourself first” is 100% a way to a sustainable giving. The moment you start sacrificing your basic needs to help others, you are on the path to become the next one needing help, imo.
Curious about your “good charity” indicators: do you take a close look at their financials? Read their impact stories? Or is it more intuitive, based on your experience?
We don't have access to any part of the planet below a depth of 2.5 miles, so the image should compare the volume of accessible water to the volume of accessible Earth, except then it would fail in its dishonest mission to make people say "gosh that sphere looks relatively small compared to the other sphere, I must restrict myself to ten-second showers."

Even if it was accessible water to accessible non-water I don't really see how the metric is relevant in any decision making. Is it warning against a half-baked plan to mix water with every available cubic meter of soil or rock? Because there wouldn't be enough water to do that crazy thing? Thanks, I'll bear that in mind.
Looks nice, congrats on the launch.

After building an app from scratch, I see the value in a nice starter template.
I will agree a hotel computer is dodgy. I did try and give it a once over in the OS, and checked for any obvious hardware keyloggers before doing anything. I also changed my password as soon as I was done. The alternative, if I remember correctly, was not making it home. With a password I can evaluate a situation and take a calculated risk to solve a problem. If I had passkeys, I would have been out of luck. Maybe I could have spent hours with some customer service agents to try and figure it out, hopefully before the flight left. If a passkey left someone stranded in another country, any idealistic views they might have would quickly be replaced by frustration and anger.

The other 2 examples I gave were not random public computers. They were either in my control or the control of trusted family members. I still want solutions to those situations that passkeys can’t answer (as far as I know).

There are similar issues with 2FA. I was traveling a few years back and broke my phone. It’s the only time I’ve ever broken a phone. All the info for my flight and my tickets were on the phone. I was able to get to an Apple Store and get a replacement. When I went to set it up I got a 2FA prompt (it was enabled for me without me opting in sometime earlier). The only reason I was actually able to set it up was because I brought an iPad with me, which was just dumb luck. I often only have my phone. On my most recent trip I created a recovery key, wrote it down, and put it in a money belt I wore everyday. I’m really not sure what other option I’d have to recover if my devices were broken/lost/stolen. Of course having the key on me carries its own risk. Yes it was hidden and on my person, but I also felt the need to add a bit of randomness to it, incase someone did somehow get it, somehow figured out what the paper with a bunch of seemingly random letters was, and tried to use it. But this isn’t a normal thing people do, they’re just going to be screwed if something happens. When security starts locking out the owner because it’s too unclear, too complex, or too device restrictive, it can hurt more than it helps.

I understand the issues with passwords and why people want to get rid of them, but this feels like a happy path solution that doesn’t account for edge cases, which is a problem. There will always be edge cases and they can’t be ignored for something as foundational as authentication.
Why are you entitled to make money from YouTube though? Monetisation is part of the reason the site has become a low quality content farm. Now it’s just an industrial clickbait and ragebait machine. Even the educational channels just pump out poorly researched crap or convert Wikipedia articles to video format. Back in the days it was just a fun little site for people to upload whatever they felt like and it was great, the content was organic.
For end users, I wonder what the most optimal outcome would be?

Perhaps breaking out just the search business into its own company, then having it classed as a utility and be treated as such?

ie its not allowed to screw with the results, can't inject ads into results, etc.

The truly-ad free search experience. :)
Not really inovative, this used to be common in C libraries for network programming, back when C paint was still rather fresh.
Thank you for sharing. I have tried not working for extensive periods of time, and I love it.

I have the time to work on various projects to not feel bored and useless, plus working out and going out. I do not gauge my worth based on "value" of my output, as it is very clear that the perceived value in our society makes no sense whatsoever. So I still feel productive doing random things I love.

It wasn't always like that for me though. Things improved a lot when I started fasting, took care of my diet and started working out.

Hope things work out for you, work or no work :)
> they’re not art directable or dynamic

This is not true I believe. There are plenty of papers out there revolving around dynamic/animated splat-based models, some using generative models for that aspect too.

There are also some tools out there that let you touch up/rig splat models. Still not near what you can do with meshes but I think fundamentally it’s not impossible.
> The AGPL deception is you brand yourself as community-minded. As long as you don't rely on external contributions that's fair. But what the AGPL startups don't emphasize is they require you to either assign your copyright to them or give them extra privileges to your contributions to be able to relicense it under non AGPL (if they don't they don't know what they are doing).

There's nothing specific to the AGPL or startups here, it's a common model. The FSF themselves require copyright assignment if you want to contribute to FSF projects.
Don't use this, it's worse than useless
There's also the video of this talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ne0GArfeMs
Recent research showed the increase in the number of programmers twofold every year all over the world.

That means 75% of Programmers (SW Developers) have less then 2 years of experience!

We are still a very inexperienced and unregulated industry.
I don't know if it's fair to say that the CCP should be characterized as a weak government, as opposed to the government that pulled off a miracle in modernizing China and competing on the world stage.

A lot of people criticize the state of Chinese academics as uncreative and fraudulent, and their industries as copycats, but there might cross a tipping point where China is clearly more innovative than the EU, even as the EU leads the world in democratically-minded regulations and civic rights.

There are many world democracies and autocracies. We absolutely should never expect that merely following some first principles of free markets and democracies should determine why some nations rank atop the world.