skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
They're using the firebase API, https://github.com/devflowinc/trieve-hn-discovery/tree/main/... so no showdead, I think.
If you're trying to fix it in good faith, then marriage counseling and the like is already going to be in the conversation. Still, you can lead a horse to water but can't make them drink. Maybe most couples can reach a compromise, but the blank-slate attitude in the article is for the birds. It's informed by religious conviction. The sanctity of marriage is what's at stake and one's own happiness is secondary.
> we all must agree they were new and unknown

GLP-1 agonists have been on the market for 20+ years. They’ve been studied for longer.

Meanwhile, lead has a millenia-old track record.
contributes to the echo chamber
FYI your CSS looks to be broken on Firefox.
I wonder how this compares to tools such as cypress?
> In that case, it's illegal to look in the phone book for names starting with "john" because that's not a specific user.

No. Working with that analogy, this ruling indicates you can't get one warrant that applies to everyone in the book - simply because they are listed in the same geographic area.

A phone-book warrant would not be in harmony with the 4th Amendment.
I am wondering why Apple and Patreon even a thing in this market. Most of the content is distributed through Youtube, so Google can just step in, create patreon interface and cut both of them, get some extra revenue, and be a good guy.
The problem with the physicist's definition is that the larger the N the less the geometrical interpretation makes sense. For 1, 2, and even 3-dimensional tensors there is some connection to geometry, but eventually it loses all meaning. Physicist has to give up and "admit" that an N-dimensional tensor really just is a collection of N-1-dimensional tensors.
Are other hotels near popular places in the US following the same procedure? Or is Vegas at higher risk?
Need to take into account different body types, and whether the goal is to burn calories or not. Whether there is time gained or not. Say, walking is evidently more efficient than running. Why do people run then? Because circumstances demand it; because they like to stay or get into shape, because they want to burn fat, because they enjoy a change of pace, or because they need to catch a bus. Or simply: because they can / find it fun (children). Speaking of children: hopping is the most efficient form of movement for small children (IIRC around the age of 6).
And, if you hate strong typing, there's always map[string]any.
Good question. But reading this thread and every one of these has multiple people saying "Apple users know and choose to have this experience, we've opted in."
We switched from Python to Julia for numeric code. It's generally much faster (and easier to optimize), and has slightly better syntax for mathy code.

It's worth noting that Julia is very similar to go, despite superficial differences. They're both small languages with big libraries, use the same concurrency model, use a mark-and-sweep GC with an emphasis on making it easy for the programmer to reduce garbage/allocations, and both use structs + functions rather than classes.
Wasn't it a voluntary search?
Didn't the Wagner Prigozhin (sp?) guys try that already?
It still isn't on par with VS code, but it has been good enough for my team.
Because AMD's general purpose offerings are pretty poor in comparison to intel (e.g. per per watt, productivity, etc). AMD only really shines in high end applications like gaming or high core count cloud computing.
I don't know if you are a parent or have first-hand experience here. But I am and do, and schools spend an inordinate amount of time doing this. Especially in elementary school, but throughout the public education system messages of caring for others are literally everywhere in every possible context.

Even when I was a student this was the case; we had units and assemblies presenting these concepts to an incredibly frustrating and condescending degree.
The Chestnut Tree: The Experience of Contingency
Looks like monetization is tip based going forward.

https://help.odysee.tv/category-basics/paymentmethod/
Thanks for building AccessKit and making this so much easier for us!
No, by default it is insecure. I don't know where you got the impression otherwise.

Unless you think "user loses control of machine via supply chain attack" is security, which is just... downright Orwellian.
> ie., I claim that I can always find a family of problems P1..Pn where the computational distribution will rule out that reasoning is taking place.

Finding edge cases is not a great way to evaluate probabilistic processes. You'll almost always find a pathological case. I'm sure we can find a series of questions of increasing difficulty where humans think they're of decreasing difficulty. That wouldn't prove humans don't reason.

> If you could create an LLM that "prompted itself" according to the complexity of the problem

You don't have to create one. We know that in-context learning is roughly equivalent to training, so you can add instructions about evaluating task difficulty and different approaches depending on the result to the system prompt. You'll see it's possible to do that estimate. Agents use that all the time to decide when to split a task into subtasks and when to proceed with solving.

> So whereas a person will understand a novel problem (family) on the basis of its meaning, and expend time appropriately, the LLM is limited to sampling from prior examples of such problems in training data.

Can you prove humans aren't just sampling from training data + preserving context? I don't believe anyone has really documented how human thought works at that level. I'm not saying it's true or false, just - do we actually know enough to validate the claim you made?
If there are 5G towers that might be possible
Reminds me of the “Indians go back to India”, Jesus was American, etc :D

(I do wonder if there are non-English Christians who also seriously argue “Jesus spoke {my native language here}” - it seems to be a very US evangelical specific thing but I am curious if there are similar non-English groups)
Mostly, I use a physical notepad and pens/pencils. If I take notes this way, I "internalize" them better. I organize them sequentially by date. If I'm working on a desktop machine, I will also occasionally use a text editor (the simplest one the DE has to offer. In Windows, this means notepad).

I've tried a ton of different methods of note-taking, including the ones you name as well as dedicated note-taking appliances. None of them work well for me, because they all complicate the note-taking such that the act of taking notes becomes disruptive to whatever it is I'm really doing.
Water is used to displace debris and to carry it up to the surface.

A cylinder of 30cm diameter and 10km deep would hold around 700k litres.
I would have to imagine the manufacturers of the millions of smart electric, water, and natural gas meters across the US might have some comments.
Well yes, the Olympics were all-amateur until the 1980s. Tennis boycotted the games from 1924 to 1988 because of the ban on professionals competing.

Today it's primarily professional and bears little resemblance to Baron de Coubertin's vision.
I agree the situations are different and this situation warrants privacy protection.

However, the court fails to articulate anything close to a workable rule in its reasoning.

Further, because the actual outcome was an upheld search d/t good faith reliance, the finding of unconstitutionality is basically dicta, and would/should be ignored by other districts and even in the same district.

I don't think this ruling offers the protections people want or should have. I think that point stands, however hidden by downvoting.
You're basically describing the Winter Olympics.

And all of the equestrian events in the Olympics.

Tim Duncan famously took up basketball after his swimming career was derailed when a hurricane destroyed the only pool on st Croix, and they couldn't rebuild it.
Well it depends on context I would say. Like first you have to consider sample size. The more you break something down the lower the sample size becomes, and the more breakdowns you try, the more likely you will find some kind of spurious pattern.

But let's say the effect is real. Then you have to start considering what is causing why, which is highly context dependant.

To take the example of gender bias in the grad school admissions, men were more likely to be admitted but the effect reversed when breaking down by department.

Hypotheses come to mind:

A department being easy to get into causes a higher male ratio. (Subhypotheses: Maybe men want to take it easy? Maybe women seek out prestige?)

High male ratio of applicants to a department causes it to become easier to get into. (Maybe funding flows to male departments?)

There is some kind of unknown factor that both causes a high male ratio and a high rate of admissions (Maybe a booming sector attracts men and leads to easy admissions?)

With all these possibilities I think it should become clear that there can't be a general solution to your question, you have to consider the context and dig deeper.
> do no evil

google dropped that slogan a decade or more ago
This is fine for Intel actually. What really matters for the fortunes of Intel is their foundry service now. Intel could very well make those chips for NVidia if they can figure out the foundry service.
How do we fix content recommendation?
I'm about to start a new job working on content recommendation at a FAANG company and I want to dig into ethical approaches to the problem. So far most techniques I have read about address privacy and bias.

Bias is a very tricky topic to handle without introducing my personal inclinations. If I were to follow my internal compass I would end up censoring the personality cult I see on the right but I also acknowledge that the inverse situation is terrible. My conclusion is that any individual's attempt at addressing bias will only introduce their own so I should stay out of the political realm.

Privacy is important but I don't think I'll be able to influence the company to collect less info and I'm not convinced that better privacy leads to better outcomes (cable news polarized us without personal information).

I’m looking for evidence-based strategies or research on how to ethically and effectively manage a recommendation system. Any insights, links to studies, or arguments would be greatly appreciated.
Ultimately it's why I left California. If you live there you are subject to a real estate cartel that will extract all your surplus earnings, and they seem to have an absolute lock on power with the help of a ton of useful idiots who buy BS arguments against home construction. There's no rational response but to leave.

There's a growing YIMBY movement but at this point the mismatch between supply and demand is so great you'd have to embark on a crash building program to make housing prices sane.
Admittedly, I also wondered about this. I'm taking Patreon at their word (for now), but I would welcome Apple making some kind of statement indicating that Patreon is allowed to disable payments in the app.

And if it is true that they're not allowed to disable payments, I would also love to know what's special about Amazon, Netflix, and Spotify (other than their size) that would allow them to "get away" with the same behavior.
Since these are apparently being done while people are out of their rooms, according to the article, what do they expect to find? Surely everyone planning on doing something malicious would leave their tools behind...

Also why aren't they targeting laptops? That's probably the #1 "hacking tool" in anyone's arsenal.

But, hey, I bet this looks great on a Powerpoint presentation to the board of directors.
There's a further means by which random selection methods can be useful (and the fact that the computing device you're reading this on all but certainly has a robust random-sequence generating capability speaks to this): random decisionmaking can avoid biases of rational or deterministic methods. There's a great essay discussing this posted a decade ago in Aeon, "How to choose? If you can’t choose wisely, choose randomly":

<https://aeon.co/essays/if-you-can-t-choose-wisely-choose-ran...>

Of course, if this is the true function of astrology, then random predictions would be working as designed. Though that's not what most people, astrology practitioners included, who take astrology seriously seem to believe.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/jan/19/us-inflatio... ("Half of recent US inflation due to high corporate profits, report finds")

https://www.npr.org/2023/05/19/1177180972/economists-are-rec... ("Economists are reconsidering how much corporate profits drive inflation")

https://www.kansascityfed.org/research/economic-bulletin/cor... ("Corporate Profits Contributed a Lot to Inflation in 2021 but Little in 2022—A Pattern Seen in Past Economic Recoveries")

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/what-caused-the-u-s-pande... ("Brookings Institute: What caused the U.S. pandemic-era inflation?")

Larry Summers is a hack, I'm unsure how he any goodwill left to buy ears with:

"From his newly elevated platform in June 2022, Summers delivered another prophecy of woe. During remarks before the London School of Economics, Summers declared that “we need five years of unemployment above 5 percent to contain inflation — in other words, we need two years of 7.5 percent unemployment or five years of 6 percent unemployment or one year of 10 percent unemployment.” In the Harvard professor’s estimation, U.S. policymakers had no choice but to deliberately throw millions of Americans out of work or else accept a steadily deepening inflationary crisis."

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/06/larry-summers-was-wr... ("Larry Summers Was Wrong About Inflation")

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-05-30/wages-not... | https://archive.today/zAIzK ("Bloomberg: Wages Are Not an Important Driver of US Inflation, San Francisco Fed Study Finds")

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/UNRATE ("FRED: Unemployment rate")

https://apnews.com/article/inflation-prices-consumers-econom... ("Americans’ refusal to keep paying higher prices may be dealing a final blow to US inflation spike")
Yeah it feels like having a very focused editor with a polished workflow could help OSM get more people to contribute, although it would be very nice to maybe have an advanced mode I imagine. Places get new neighbourhoods all the time so it would be great to be able to rigourously modify maps from the same place you contribute from otherwise, although maybe a desktop experience would be much better for this.

I've noticed StreetComplete focuses on details to fill in an already existing street layout, which makes it feel like there are clearly separated stages to the mapping process. First get the basic layout down, then fill in more details like zoning and buildings, and then more details. I like the idea of that so far.
> buying any necessary tools and equipment to do it was probably cheaper than hiring someone to do it

This has really driven my decisions a lot. I've found that pretty much any set of tools I could need for common home repair costs less than 2 hours of labor that someone would charge me.

Sure, my time acquiring these tools and using them isn't worthless, but I personally enjoy doing it and find that to have value in and of itself. (Certainly that's not true of everyone.)

There are some cases where I just don't want to deal with it, though. For example, I needed a new railing put on my deck a few months ago. I know I'm not great at woodworking, and honing those skills doesn't really interest me all that much; someone else would do a much nicer job of it than I would. I didn't want to have to buy some more tools that I don't really have good storage space for. My compromise was to hire a handyman I trust to build the railing, but I decided I would stain it myself.
This only works in finite dimensions, which for mathematicians excludes pretty much all of the interesting cases.
IF NOT EXISTS is incredibly useful to resolve the state of difference between environments.

A classic example is a massive table on production, but an empty table on dev. Dev gets migrated fine, but prod fails for reasons. You now need to resolve it.

Also, we have a convention (not enforced) that we let PostgreSQL name the relation (e.g PK, UQ, Index et al) for us.

So we don't do:-

CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY IF NOT EXISTS idx_test_data ON test_table (data);

We do:-

CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY ON schema_name.table_name (column_name);
The core time series engine, called cesium (https://github.com/synnaxlabs/synnax/tree/main/cesium), is written completely from scratch. It's kind of designed as a "time-series S3", where we store blobs of samples in a columnar fashion and index by time. We can actually get 5x the write performance of something like InfluxDB in certain cases.

For other meta-data, such as channels, users, permissions, etc. we rely on CockroachDB's Pebble, which is a RocksDB compatible KV store implemented in pure go.
Society probably needs to have a frank conversation about if things like TikTok are a net benefit or not.
This has been posted a few times in various formats. I merged the comments into https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41208252.
It's pretty clear he'd default to that advice for just about everyone who wasn't in physical danger or being abused in some way.
This is unexpected. With popular AIs being extremely SFW, seeing one with an intent to go NSFW is a surprise.
I used eSIM for traveling - it's been such a joy to have a full working data plan in another country the moment I touch down in the country.

https://redgreenrepeat.com/2024/05/12/traveling-and-your-int...

From your post and experience - I can see eSIM would be a rough experience - my main line at home is still a SIM and the eSIM is optional
I think your argument is exactly backward, and cherry-picking a quote from Russell doesn't really buttress your argument if you know the full philosophical background of these two.

Russell saw Wittgenstein's brilliance early on and supported him in his work, but as he was near the end of his career and his mental faculties were on the decline, Russell found it increasingly difficult to understand Wittgenstein's philosophy.

Russell in hindsight was the lightweight next to Wittgenstein's brilliance.

If you want a non-philosopher's idea of outstanding philosophy, I would have pointed out Nietzsche instead.
I own a Garmin watch. It doesn't have the capacity to monitor anything about my substance intake. When I drink anything, my stress level jumps up and my heart-rate variability (HRV) goes down, dramatically. My sleep quality also goes down, regardless of whether I drink water and B vitamins. It's pretty clear drinking isn't acutely healthy. I don't have strong opinions on the validity of the J-curve.

With all that said, it's also apparent that the social benefits of drinking are irreplaceable, particularly with regard to those for civilization which are similar to the benefits of tobacco and caffeine. All three lower social hurdles to the point that introverts can form new relationships and maintain them effectively. All three are able to frontload collective euphoria and force individuals to deal with the fallout. All three substances are lindy, but of the three, alcohol is the most lindy. That alcohol has been with us for (at least!) 12,000 years should probably be reason enough to suspect temperance's practicality and usefulness. Like vegan and carnivorous civilizations, alcohol-free civilizations (as in, have cities) don't actually exist. We also have pretty extensive records globally of daily drinking that far exceeds those recommended by the WHO, during eras of significantly worse healthcare, yet these civilizations prospered in spite of both. (It's frequently been argued that alcohol was drank because the water was unsafe, but this argument isn't very plausible. Generally everyone in the ancient world understood that boiling water made it safer to drink.)

With that said, drunkenness is categorically reviled in these civilizations, but generally regarded as a tolerable risk for all the other goods it provides. All-day drinking of low ABV drinks seems to be the optima, but you know, cars.

From ~375BC:

>Three bowls do I mix for the temperate: one to health, which they empty first, the second to love and pleasure, the third to sleep. When this bowl is drunk up, wise guests go home. The fourth bowl is ours no longer, but belongs to violence; the fifth to uproar, the sixth to drunken revel, the seventh to black eyes, the eighth is the policeman's, the ninth belongs to biliousness, and the tenth to madness and hurling the furniture.

Some things never change.
Las Vegas has a uniquely scalable infrastructure for conventions. Lodging, restaurants, meeting spaces, entertainment.
Why would he chase you if he could never catch you?

He would just sit down and try to stay awake longer than you and then bop you on the head.
> does anybody want to argue that Apple hosting the Patreon app on iOS provides more value to Patreon subscribers and creators than the existence of Patreon itself does?

There is a video link on the page from the original post where the Patreon CEO explains and reiterates the issues.

Notably, at one point, he says that Apple Platform brings in the most money to Patreon.

So there, looks like Apple brings in the money for Patreon. Apple seems to want a cut of that.
2 main cars, 4x every 3 months we put 3-5k miles and 2 classic cars. 1x each
> Like there's still no Set class

map[T]struct{} ?
There’s no resemblance at all.
Show HN: R.py, a small subset of Python Requests
i revisited the work that i started in 2022 re: writing a subset of Requests but using the standard library: https://github.com/gabrielsroka/r

back then, i tried using urllib.request (from the standard library, not urllib3) but it lacks what Requests/urllib3 has -- connection pools and keep alive [or that's where i thought the magic was] -- so my code ran much slower.

it turns out that urllib.request uses http.client, but it closes the connection. so by using http.client directly, i can keep the connection open [that's where the real magic is]. now my code runs as fast as Requests/urllib3, but in 5 lines of code instead of 4,000-15,000+

moral of the story: RTFM over and over and over again.

"""Fetch users from the Okta API and paginate."""

import http.client
import json
import re
import urllib.parse

# Set these:
host = 'domain.okta.com'
token = 'xxx'
url = '/api/v1/users?' + urllib.parse.urlencode({'filter': 'profile.lastName eq "Doe"'})

headers = {'authorization': 'SSWS ' + token}
conn = http.client.HTTPSConnection(host)
while url:
conn.request('GET', url, headers=headers)
res = conn.getresponse()
for user in json.load(res):
print(user['id'])
links = [link for link in res.headers.get_all('link') if 'rel="next"' in link]
url = re.search('<https://[^/]+(.+)>', links[0]).group(1) if links else None

https://docs.python.org/3/library/urllib.request.html

https://docs.python.org/3/library/http.client.html
Mechanical sympathy now favors SIMD instructions and hyperthreads because sequential loops are slower even unrolled.
Casually showing off your B210 lol jk, I’m just jealous. My RSP1A clone only goes about 10MHz wide. Patiently waiting for an affordable 30MHz wide SDR.
It's not illegal. You can donate money to Apple whenever you want. The issue is not that you're giving money to Apple, it's that Apple can force itself as a middleman.
Hey, we're aware and a little embarrassed! We use some nested CSS selectors that aren't compatible with some browsers and haven't gotten around to fixing it yet, sorry!
New sustainable reaction for creating unique molecular building blocks