skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What makes you think a website with "AI" is a big product?

IMO AI is positioned to be a commodity, and that's how Meta is approaching it, and of course doing their best to make it happen. I don't think, on the basis of what we've seen, that there is a sustainable competitive advantage - the gap between closed models and open is not big, and the big players are having to use distilled, less-capable models to make inference affordable, and faster.

I think it's probably clear to everyone that we haven't seen the killer apps yet - though AI code completion (++ language directed refactoring, simple codegen etc.) is fairly close. I do think we'll see apps and data sets built that could not have been cost-effectively built before, leveraging LLMs as a commodity API.

Realtime voice modality with interruptions could be the basis of some very powerful use cases, but again, I don't think there's a moat.
Great story! I had something similar on I think it was the C64 and a game I think was Sid Meirer (sp?) Pirates. If you hit eh Break key several times quickly enough, you could view the running code, edit it and start it again. Led to all sorts of fun exploration.
For one, to avoid massive number of bots using the API for free.
Why can't you just debug this yourself? I don't think completely relying on LLMs for something like this will do you any good in the long run.
Yes and no, if you favorite editor was Tilde you'd be in a lot more pain to have it work on most non linux.

Vim is either already installed or at one click/one command away almost whatever the system you use, that's the closest we'll ever have from "everywhere" in this day and age IMHO.
anyone with no time to properly setup an IDE before delving into some code to quickly find something out becomes that "vim/emacs user". Certainly in C++ you can't make sense of the code without the right defines and include path and configuring the IDE to actually understand C++ code is not that quick at times (and that's before we get into things like Qt which essentially add their own language features)
All the current motors are very controllable (absolute position, speed, etc).

They can be hooked up to:

- A battery box, with simple buttons.

- A hub, controlled via bluetooth (protocol is documented, and there are some libraries).

- A hub that can be programmed (spike).

- A raspberry pi, with an official hat (build hat). This also comes with a python library.

I'm actually pretty happy with these motors. The only downside is that the technic sets are meant to be controlled with an app.
Same here. I can understand, they don't want their usage to go over the roof with fake accts
Yup, you are definitely an idiot. You are quoting the economic situation and I am quoting the attitude towards money. What is the problem? You can a make a point about culture and economics in the same article.

Literally read a sentence beyond what I quoted.

>"I'm just living life, but that's how everyone is," she tells me over the phone, noting that most of her friends are enjoying their early 20s without too much regard for the future.

How hard is it to engage in a point rather than trying to prove that I somehow didn't read the article?
Beautiful little story. I love when such things are allowed to exist.
> Are they a livestreaming "first" business-man/company/sole trader?

Maybe, it depends on what they do next. Will they start uploading fewer videos and live-streaming more because they realised that’s where the money is?

> Revenue sources are not necessarily the be all and end all of determining what your key business concern is, or what your business should put first.

Agreed. But Google does put ads first. All the tracking, web proposals, Chrome, it’s all in service of ads. Perhaps you’re using an ad blocker and that’s making you forget, but Google’s services, like search and YouTube, are huge blobs of ads with a few bits of content sprinkled throughout and the ratio is getting worse in the ads’ favour. So yes, Google is an ad company. Not because it makes the most money from it, but because most of its effort is in expanding and defending their ad revenue. Heck, they literally spend billions of dollars just to make sure you search with their engine to see their ads.
Oh boy, this works: Invoke-RestMethod https://ip.network/more -UserAgent "curl/"

It would of course be better if it honored ContentType header.
Anecdotally, everyone on our team uses either ChatGPT or Copilot or both. We're not a small shop.

I'm surprised it's only at 72% to be honest.

If I'm hiring a junior/mid level guy, I'd want this person to be good at using LLMs to increase productivity.
YouTube Ultra Focus Mode Chrome Plugin – Distraction Free YouTube Learning
Within the article:

> The first microprocessor existing on a single chip was the contemporary Intel 4004.

CPUs made from multiple chips had been around already, I believe.
I wonder whether any other ISAs support something similar.

In 32 bit ARM you could get close with variations on a load/store instruction with an offset of 0.

LDR R0, [R1]
LDR R0, [R1, #-0]
LDR R0, [R1, #0]!
LDR R0, [R1], #0

Same instruction but different addressing modes and therefore different mnemonics.
I'm writing something like that in python myself. It's still at an early stage. Sooner or later I'll push it to github even if it's in a crappy stage.
Last year I got sucked into poking at some of the cross building rust issues (specifically issues targeting Solaris and BSD and issues cross hosting on macOS). Illumos isn't terribly exotic but the rust bootstrapping process has a few rough edges that will cut you. Illumos suffers mainly because it's not popular enough to get a ton of attention by the rustc folks and because it's not quite Solaris.

That said, for CI, cross building is much easier to scale than tracking down every permutation. For something like Illumos, that's not too bad. But for Solaris/SPARC? Heh.

Since cranelift-codegen was an optional component that can be disabled,
the x.py tooling could notice if a build failed in such a component

I think there's quite a bit of utility in ensuring that as much of the rust core builds. As cranelift-codegen is optional, the scripts should be able to bundle up a distribution with everything that succeeded.

Edit: Just took a quick look, and it sure looks like cranelift isn't built by default (at least that's what config.example.toml says and the none of the defaults available via 'x setup' seem to override that).
You have rather high expectations towards the supervisor there ... maybe you were one of the "unlucky" ones who had a genius supervisor ...

There aren't that many people in the world who write bootloader code daily for a living, an even smaller subset of those would ever have done one entirely from scratch (vs. just board-porting U-Boot), and even of those, the likelihood of someone having done a secureboot capable one wouldn't be high. Assuming you have such a person as a thesis advisor is a huge stretch ...

That said though, a thesis is (or should be) a learning exercise. Even a complete fail (to achieve the "initial" objective) can make a great thesis if new knowledge - even negative proofs, "this isn't possible because ..." - come out of it. It's just my opinion maybe, but a graduate should never be taught "fake it till you make it"; rather, describe and document failures thoroughly, explain the observations, highlight and justify the parts that work or are breakthroughs. That can make a much better readable and much more useful thesis than one that skims over one-time lucky else nonreproducible results and delivers uncommented sources that fail to compile for anyone but the original author. In that sense, I would argue that a good thesis advisor will focus on the scientific process, documentary evidence, clarity of experimental setups and tests/checks/benchmarks performed, not whether the outcome would be "great enough" to pitch as a founder to VCs.
It's not just google, it's all media. The more embedded and authentic advertising looks the better it works.

Magazine/newspaper ads exist as much as a pretext for the magazine to write nice things about their advertisers in reviews and such. The real product reddit sells, I think, is turning a blind eye when advertisers sockpuppet the hell out of the site. Movies try to milk product placement for as much as they can because it's more effective than regular advertising.
I hear you..
The pads are very thin and i dont see how they could be made thicker, them being inside the mechanism. I am not sure they would last nearly as long as conventional pads.
That's true, but they both made more mistakes than Sonnet for me. I use them with Aider.
Pick a different architecture - anything 32bit. Exception handling on 64bit windows works differently, where the overhead is in the PE headers instead of asm directly (and is in general lower). You don't have the setup and teardown in your example

Throwing exception has the same overhead in both cases. In case of noexcept function, the function has to (or used to have, depending on architecture setup an exception handling frame and remove it when leaving.

>Naively it'd seem like without noexcept, you raise the exception; and with noexcept, you call std::terminate instead

Except you may call a normal function from a noexcept function, and this function may still raise an exception.
I’m quite sure Google has put the ads in the answers ? Adsense ? Where have you been ?
I can't find the explanation on why noexcept could hurt performance. One reason I can see itt is some containers like unordered_map can inline the hash along with the key with noexcept, which may not worth additional memory overhead if the hashing is relatively cheap. He talks a bit about it in "Intel+Windows+MSVC" but not much info. I wish there was

noexcept helps in some cases that author doesn't seem to be using and any performance gain or loss is basically due to some (unrelated?) optimization decisions the compiler takes differently in noexcept builds if I am understanding correctly?
Trains are orders of magnitude more accessible than airports could ever be, what are you talking about?
You worry about that? I'm hoping for it!
Proxying Ethernet in HTTP
Kind of nice visuals, although I still prefer functionality and speed over visual sparkles.
For entertainment and a no-fluff service, I still recommend https://wtfismyip.com/, which offers the data in any output format you could ever need
I assume that's the limit for overtime hours, e.g. if you works 12 hours a day, 12-8 = 4 hours of that is counted towards 125 hours limit over 3 months.
Sonova announces the first hearing aid with real-time AI
Crafting formulas: Lambdas all the way down
What makes you think AI will become a commodity?

In 25 years, nobody has been able to compete with Google in the search space. Even though search is the best business model ever. Because search is so hard.

AI is even harder. It is search PLUS model research PLUS expensive training PLUS expensive inference.

I don't think a single company (like Meta) will be able to keep up with the leader in AI. Because the leader might throw tens of billions of dollars per year at it, and still be profitable. Afaik, Meta has spent less thatn $1B on LLAMA so far.

We might see some unexpected twist taking place, like distributed AI or something. But it is very unclear yet.
3. On the evolutionary front, the fact is that you evolved to eat in a group - the possibility of someone sitting alone eating a meal made by others basically >didn’t exist until a century ago. So it formed who you are today, whether you like it or not.

diogenes (maybe buddha also) would disagree.
One mayor thing which changed definitely and is underrepresented is the exposure to various frequencies.
What we learned translating a SQL linter from Python to Rust (40x faster)
I can understand. I like to keep some anonymity because post-acquisition I've started consulting with a large corp on innovation and M&A stuff (totally unrelated to my sales coaching), and I need to keep some privacy.

You'll find out who I am right after we chat via email.
C++ had that too, in 1998.
C++11 and C23 changed the meaning of auto to mean "infer this type".
The web is full of human shills. Why should LLMs be any different? They will tack their boilerplate disclaimer on and be done with it.
Probably the files will be hoarded.

Previous discovered files from old floppies by AW, and also ones by Keith Haring was sold as "NFT". That had the positive side effect for me to be able to extract exact copies (although not original files).

See here: https://www.amigalove.com/viewtopic.php?t=2594
Hi all,

I built and launched NerdHunt, a job board for the tech industry.

I built my own data fetching pipeline to find jobs from the internet and advertise them here. Im currently working on improving that pipeline so more jobs are found

I am too much "in my own head" at this point and would love some feedback.

If you were looking for a job, would you consider using this platform?

If not, why? Is there a key feature you feel it should have?

Thank you in advance
Isn't that dependent on the programming language?
Exactly. Mozilla CEO salaries might require the Google deal but development of Firefox or alternative browsers does not. Mozilla Corporation was a mistake and I look forward to a time where the leading open browser is developed as a public good again instead of as a product used to sell ads.
He is not a slave.
This is the upstream repo:

https://github.com/mpolden/echoip
SQLpage: SQL-only webapp builder for data analysts to build web apps quickly
Was the People's Republic of Kampuchea, which only lasted for 10 years, ever shown on globes during that period, or did most globes continue to label it as Cambodia?
How do you recycle Liquid Metal? Do you just throw the paper towel in the trash? Is it toxic? (I know it's very little quantities...)
Good, less pointless UI changes and extension API breakages.
Is it just me or is Brockman leaving absolutely huge ? I can’t believe this isn’t front page. Basically everyone who is anyone has left or is leaving. It’s ridiculous.
No I'm talking about response time 'requirements'
Improved noise reduction. The fear will be apprehension mistakes being compounded from speech models.
And why would banks keep giving loans to PE-controlled firms if the likelihood is high of no repayment? They're going to know the firm is PE controlled going into the deal.
The competition is quite fearce to land a degree, and what you are seeing is CV building, with the eye to get an opportunity to land an on-site position abroad, which can eventually provide a way to get a job in another non-Indian company.
Any examples / kind of titles of said courses? I'm in a few about software projects and another health related, and 90% of the action is from the founder / OG - if they go quiet, there is nothing left.
The lifetime of a medium is of no use for the general user if the lifetime of a drive is smaller and the industry stop making new compatible ones or historians in the future never have the budget and/or tools to custom build new drives.
Yes, please? I can't wait until we stop saving code as text. It's silly. Kill the formatting, let everyone see the level they prefer, stop limiting everyone to file-level granularity. Show the types that are relevant in context and allow switching the views.
That's a different question though. The person you replied to was asked to explain why they think Sonnet 3.5 works well/better compared to GPT-4o. To which they gave a good answer of Sonnet actually taking context and new information better into account when following up.

They might be able to debug it themselves, maybe they should be able to debug it themselves. But I feel like that is a completely different conversation.
Excellent example clearly from a fellow soldier from the trenches!

As somebody who has built several instances of both payments- and travel booking systems, I have seen things in systems that "adhere to published schemas" (often because the schemas were beastly, design-by-committee hellscapes of extensibility) that defy belief.

While there is a strong argument to be made that strict type systems in programming langues like Haskell and Rust make it very difficult to play outside of the rules, this is unfortunately not the case in practice when it comes to APIs - both at present where you have a JSON Schema or Open API spec if you are lucky, and in the past (XML Schema, SOAP).

I wish that the ability to express a tight, fit-for-purpose schema or API actually resulted in this commonly being done. But look at the average API of any number of card payment gateways, hotels, or airlines, and you enter into a world where each integration with a new provider is a significant engineering undertaking to map the semantics - and the errors, oh the weird and wonderful errors... to the semantics of your system.

I am glad to work in the space-adjacent industry now, where things are ever so slightly better.

(Note the lack of sarcastic emphasis - it really is only _slightly_ better!)
Seems to be missing Tibet
Neat, surprised Linear doesnt support this natively
Indeed: (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19133653) and (https://auxiliarymemory.com/2017/01/06/rereading-the-soul-of...)
... and that's not the same book :)
> What is happening here.

Wordpress Plugins.
> but they absolutely should not deliberately advise in a manner that benefits another party to the detriment of the user.

No, no... We don't prevent that in capitalism. See, regulation stifles innovation. Let the market decide. People might get harmed, but we can hide these events.

It's research... Things happen... Making money is just a secondary effect. We're all non-profits.

/s.
Good for him, seems like OpenAI is moving towards a business model of profitability, and Anthropic seems to be more aligned with the original goals of OpenAI.

What is open about Anthropic ?
> Wikimedia is often criticized for asking for donations, while having millions in the bank, but this is exactly why.

You are omitting the part where Wikimedia spends large parts of that donation money on things barely related to Wikipedia. Not to mention inflated salaries throughout the organization.
or it makes it obvious that Google has had a monopoly for reasons other than the difficulty of making a search engine (this is the truth.)
And then the new "adblockers" will be AI based too, and will take the AI's answer as input and remove all product placement.

It's just a cat and mouse game, really
"write a poem about lady Macbeth as a empowered female and make reference to the delicious new papaya flavoured fizzy drink from Pepsi"
Similar to https://charmstone.app/ but I really enjoy your "contextual" config. I wish it was dynamic somehow, though..
In the long run, advanced user-LLM conversations, would zero in on composite figure-of-merit formulas, expressed in terms of conventional figure-of-merit quantities. There will be plenty of niche to differentiate products. Cheap test setups will prevent lies in datasheets, and randomized proctoring by the end-users. "Aligning" (manipulating) LLM responses to drive economic traffic is a short term exploit that will evaporate eventually.
Sorry to be presumptuous, dang, but
lifes are at stake..

I'll take responsibility until we all have time to think about forum mechanism redesign

I know it's a tough job, I have thought about applying myself..
I was recently diagnosed as "pre-diabetic" which was new to me. I have been put on an NHS funded program with an online mentor and weight monitoring. Obviously prevention is also being ramped up.
I'm not sure what "Marshall Islands vs Marshall Islands (U.S.)" is supposed to mean. When it seceded from the U.S. it didn't change its name so how would that be visible?

Also Bangladesh seceded from Pakistan, not India and in 1971 not 1972.
OT, but this is one of my favorite pages on the entire interwebs. It starts exactly where I would have stated (Constantinople or Istanbul), and has some terrific historical gems:

> How many Germanies are there?
> Answers: One | Two | One, but it's _huge_
I'm pretty sure that gumby forgot more about c++ and c++ implementations than the rest of us will ever know.
The Rest is Politics, along with seemingly everyone else in the UK
Yes, qsort and bsearch can throw.
I was going to say that - this interaction would work better starting from the mouse itself. Can always use Steermouse mapped to a shortcut though..
Yup, that was the older generation. The newer generation used NIST to propagate a backdoored RNG and to weaken several ECC-curves.
Topology's Continuous Learning Model
80% higher cost and 20x less bandwidth. Holy cow. Singapore servers are expensive.
I wish I could delete this thread, but I cannot.
You don't.

For that scenario you 1) download the code, 2) verify yourself what is inside and then 3) compile. (optional 4) Subsequent versions check on the delta of changes.

There is a cost to your time/effort in performing this type of action that is proportional to the criticality of your context and the level of trust you place on the providers.

TLDR: The less you trust, the more you verify
Ask HN: Which language is easiest to get started with functional programming?
Which functional programming language do you think is best suited to understand the concepts of functional programming or to get started with functional programming?

I am looking forward to your recommendations!
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41167561
We are okay with paying for phone calls and data use, why can't we be okay with paying for AI use?

I like the idea of routing services that federate lots of different AI providers. There just needs to be ways to support an ever increasing range of capabilities in that delivery model.
Thanks for posting about our good news!
Here's some additional information about the new location:
Hetzner Docs, Cloud locations:
https://docs.hetzner.com/cloud/general/locations
Hetzner Docs, Cloud Networks:
https://docs.hetzner.com/cloud/networks/faq#can-networks-spa...
What's new, Cloud:
https://docs.hetzner.cloud/whats-new --Katie, Hetzner
This one is my favorite

Disclosure: I wrote and run ifconfig.io :)
It is, just not in the mainstream part of the music industry.
Not over night, but there is long term risk.

First, I admit, I believe in certain stereotypes that X people are more hardworking than Y people. (On average)

I believe so, because I believe that upbringing has tremendous impact of how an adult lives, commits and achieves things, and different cultures have different styles of life, and consequently guide kids differently.

UBI most definitely would not change things over night, but it could (I mean that it’s probable) start the shift towards “couch patato” like end of culture spectrum.
I found some more information about Topology's approach here: https://yellow-apartment-148.notion.site/CLM-Docs-507d762ad7..., but nothing else.

Does anyone here uses this model? What is your experience with it?
Except the compiler still needs to ensure that if an exception bubbles through a noexcept function, std::terminate will be called, even if the exception were caught at some level above. So it still needs to keep track of the noexcept frames, even when inlining the noexcept function.

Generally what a language feature is intended to do is less relevant than what it actually does, over time. Just like the "inline" keyword was intended as a compiler hint, but what it actually does is change the visibility of symbols across compilation units, and alter the rules for static variables.

Of course, noexcept isn't as useless as inline, yet. There are real uses of it as a hint in template metaprogramming, as you said.
I'm affraid sir, but you seem to be 100% correct here. And it really is frightening.
Hasnt this been around for a while? Along with Lithium and Phosphor to also help boost minecraft performance
Claude is better by the virtue of the ridiculously large context window. You can literally drop a whole directory of source code spaghetti and it will make sense of it.
And it doesn't make any sense that it's missing because it was annexed in 1951 a year with no duplicates (unlike 1949 when many countries changed).