skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
"...but ultimately the question is whether or not there is some level of ground truth that can be accessed in the form of mathematical theories."

Didn't Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem show we should anticipate some unprovable fundamental Truths, since we are within the system we seek to define?
"minimal restrictions to protect the producer’s business model"

That isn't very clear to me. Does every license author or licensor get to decide for themselves whether or not a license is Fair Source, or whether or not a limitation is "minimal"? Honestly, I don't think the limitations in the Functional Source License are "minimal". But others clearly believe they are.

The delayed part is explicit... but could a license that delays release to open source for 1,000 years be considered "fair source"? It is a DOSP as you say?

I understand that the Fair Source branding movement is still young and is likely evolving policies and procedures, but those are some of the questions I already see coming up when discussing whether or not a license is Fair Source. It may take a while for the definition to mature.
Here's a link for anyone who was interested in more detail on this, as I was: https://www.kolster.fi/en/blog/aiv-fodder-the-cream-of-the-c...
As someone who was a 30+ year 10cup (MokkaPot) a day consumer.. To someone who got Graves Disease, and had to take Carbimazole to calm my rampant Thyroids effects, and the discovery that Carbomazole+Caffeine == feeling very ill..
On the day I realised why I felt so ill in my stomach all the time, 30 mins after taking drugs, I went caffeine free, cold turkey..
There was no withdrawal at all.. I slept marginally better, but it’s questionable..
Years later, I sleep even better now my Thyroid is gone ( no more Carbimazole) and back on 10+ cups a day..
What I have noticed is that in most situations saying "PrEP" is enough. For my doctor that meant discussing Truvada, Descovy, and what is just kinda dubbed "Injectable Prep". This aligns with most apps also just saying "on prep" with no distinguishing between what prep.

I would imagine that if/when this comes to market it would likely similarly fall under "Prep" for the general community and then you discuss the specifics with your doctor.

Edit: There is also Doxypep (I just say Doxy), which while related to STD's is not related to HIV.
ELK stack is unrelated, this is the analytical/OLAP use-case not the logging stack stuff. Although you can say that logging is a specific use-case of the analytical/OLAP.

Search for the discussion around "facets".

Basically the way to think of this is, elastic/solr are MapReduce with weak database semantics layered on top. The ingest stage is the "map", you ingest JSON documents and optionally perform some transformation on them. The query is the "reduce", and you are performing some analytical summation or search on top of this.

The point of having the "map" step is that on ingest, you can augment the document with various things like tokenizations or transforms, and then write those into the stored representation, like a generated column. This happens outside your relational DB and thus doesn't incur RDBMS storage space for the transformed (and duplicated!) data, or the generation expense at query time. Pushing that stuff inside your relational store is wasteful.

It's an OLAP store. You have your online/OLTP store, you extract your OLAP measurements as a JSON document and send it to the OLAP store. The OLAP store performs some additional augmentations, then searches on it.

What facets let you do is have "groups within groups". So you have company with multiple employees inside it, you could do "select * from sales where company = 'dell' group by product facet by employee". But it's actually a whole separate layer that runs on top of grouping (and actually behaves slightly differently!), and because of the way this is done (inverted indexes) this is actually incredibly efficient for many many groups.

It's built on a "full-scan every time" idiom rather than maintaining indexes etc... but it actually makes full-scans super performant, if you stay on the happy path. And because you're full-scanning every time, you can actually build the information an index would have contained as you go... hence "inverted index". You are collecting pointers to the rows that fit a particular filter, like an index, and aggregating on them as it's built.

And the really clever bit is that it can actually build little trees of these counts, representing the different slices through OLAP hyperspace you could take when navigating your object's dimensions. So you can know that if you filter by employee there are 8 different types of products, and if we filter by "EUV tool" then there is only 1 company in the category. Which is helpful for hinting that sidebar product navigation tree in stores etc.

A lot of times if you look carefully at the HTML/JS you can see evidence of this, it will often explicitly mention facets and sometimes expose Lucene syntax directly.
Andrej Karpathy on X: RLHF is just barely RL
I imagine they vastly prefer returning on a flight-proven Crew Dragon over being the first crew ever to return on Starliner. Especially with all the Starliner issues so far.
Those are the specs you'd expect from a $500 mini PC. Step up to $700 and you will get a better CPU plus 2TB nvme SSD.

https://www.geekom.de/geekom-a5-mini-pc/
Neon: A serverless open-source alternative to AWS Aurora Postgres
The video here is interesting.

> The applications - it seems to me particularly - in optoelectronic circuits would be tremendous.

Research level optics is very high quality glass [1], with surface irregularity down to 100s of nm. But the company is trying to sell lenses [2], so perhaps for some cheap commercial applications you can create nice lenses using this method. That would be still be excellent.

[1] https://www.thorlabs.com/newgrouppage9.cfm?objectgroup_id=12...

[2] https://www.glassomer.com/products/lenses.html
Thanks for the feedback and I agree we need to do a better job messaging the value on the site. How would this have landed for you?

We are an AI orchestration platform that makes deploying open source models and frameworks using Kubernetes and docker simple. We manage the GPU and k8s resources, provide templates to common open source frameworks and an orchestration engine for your AI workflows.
Maybe we should stop using SSNs for things they were never intended for. Crazy talk, I know.
How does the concept of “checks and balances” fit into your view? I ask because, as sibling commenter points out, that’s just not how the Constitution says it works.
They mechanically open the nostril, which resists sinus closure, and that has knock-on effects for the rest of the respiratory tract. Nostrils basically don't block unless you stick something in them, but sinuses do, and opening the nostril helps directly with that. As a sinus starts to fill or close, it gets harder to pull air through the nostril, and noses are pretty flexible, so the passage narrows, which further narrows the sinus. Eventually you have a blockage, and start mouth breathing, and that's what triggers the blockage you're referring to. Sinuses serve an important purpose in humidifying air, which is important for the proper function of tonsils, especially the adenoid: adenoidal swelling is the major cause of apnea, and dry air from mouth breathing can easily trigger it.

It doesn't work for everyone, and some people are just going to need a CPAP. But it's a no-commitment intervention of negligent cost, and if it works, that's a much better outcome than needing a CPAP and everything which comes with it.

But there are actual, demonstrable reasons why it can serve as an alternative to the CPAP for some number of people, it isn't just woo. I hope I've done a good job of explaining why that is.
I’d suggest adding some more depth here

1. What’s a common approach to internal CRM at the start? What have you learned about delivering faster?

2. What preferences have you developed for replacing components with scalable vendors? What problems do you prefer to solve vs outsource?

Great topic!
This is good as far as it goes, but what about all those times customer support for companies unrelated to your credit asks you for the last four of your SSN (birthrate, address, etc.) to confirm your identity?
Snoring was for sure a problem for my wife.
Regarding WSL, I tried very hard to use Linux exclusively on my desktop for about five years. While native Linux is excellent for servers, the desktop experience still has many shortcomings and unpredictabilities. It often feels like something breaks with every new release, affecting everything from power management to input systems. I grew tired of feeling like I was rolling the dice every time I performed an upgrade. Eventually, I concluded that using Linux on the desktop (at least on a large scale) is just a pipe dream. Although Windows has its problems, WSL provides a Linux implementation with the least friction, in my experience.
it scales with a factor of less than 1.0 but yes it scales. For instance the number of thieves could be given by the ratio .001 * population.
The entire Puppeteer team is now in charge of Playwright - and PW already supports Firefox out of the box.

This project is about 5 years too late to have a purpose. I am flummoxed why anybody would do this in 2024?
Most places I've worked, there is a clear separation of roles between the Product Owner (whose job it is to handle the business case, gather requirements, understand the "why", and decide the "when" and "what"), and the engineering TL who is merely in charge of "how".

At a few places, the TL does it all: business case, requirements, project motivation, schedule, AND the implementation. A lot is asked of that person, but it results in IMO better coordination and execution, because it's not a constant battle between "engineering vs. product". Well, there is a battle, but the battle takes place entirely in the TL's head, so it's faster and less visible.

In order to do it the second way, you need to hire engineers who also can manage the business/requirements side of the project. These people are significantly harder to find than engineers who just read a requirements document and implement it.
Dev jobs where you do no frontend at all are pretty unusual, especially in startups where everyone does a bit of everything. You're often given some 'easy' fixes that are inevitably frontend before you're let loose on the 'hard' stuff at the back end. As a dev who worked on mostly frontend code for about 25 years it's incredibly annoying. It's probably a large factor in why the web sucks - a lot of devs who don't want to work on frontend apps and who don't really understand what's important in a frontend app are churning out code that isn't fit for the job. More specialism would help immensely.
I have encountered the same problem but as a FE engineer who doesn’t do backend. (we should hang out)

I think some shops just really want everyone to be interchangeable as a way of ensuring no one becomes too niche and therefore irreplaceable. i.e. it’s a control thing.

My suggestion would be to look for info early on in the vetting process for stuff like how titles work there and how teams are organized. possibly ask to talk with other potential teammates or other employees.
Specialising is only possible in larger companies (more than 500 employees). What size have these companies been? A smaller company might want to hire a backend expert, but who might have to jump into front-end for short periods - sort of an 80-20 split. Communication during the hiring process can be suboptimal for a lot of reasons: one person does the job posting, another does the interview, a third actually knows what the job entails, but they were never involved in the process. You have to account for that yourself: request a "get-to-know-eachother" with team members and ask them what they do daily. That's the only way to figure out what your own job will be like. If they are set on hiring you and are a good employer in general, they will not have a problem with a request like that.
Don't work with recruiters.
Agree - WSAD or just cursor keys would make it really 'walking' - currently it's more like 'click to jump' :)

Also, could you tweak you algorithm to have the geometry deform less at the edges of the viewport? At the moment it's a little extreme and distracting.
The sanest solution is, surprisingly, snprintf(dst, sizeof(dst), "%s", src).
> OSCP is the macOS antivirus

It's not. There are multiple layers of security, including notarization and XProtect.

> I'm pretty sure I know what the first thing any malicious software is gonna do.

What?

> macOS preferences aren't magically locked away from the rest of system, regular users can change their own user preferences, and root can change system preferences. An antivirus has to still work against an attacker who has root.

You sound confused about admin vs. root. Anyway, if you have a local attacker running on your Mac, then it's already too late for OCSP.
> the laziest implementation with "Friend".

Given the (current) weaknesses in the AI underlying these gadgets, I feel we will look back to these widgets much in the same way the "crazy flying machines" of the early days of aviation look ridiculous now. They were ridiculous.-

(But perhaps a necessary part of the technology's evolution ...)
That's a very interesting point.

We tend to think genealogically about these things. I said "Scots is descended from northumbrian" and that Ulster Scots is spoken in NI. But irl... dialects are porous. They don't really "descend."

In any case, I believe that most of the language influence is from the borderlands and the glasgow area. That said, 400 years is a long time... especially considering how young English is.
In Poland you have a national ID card you carry with you if you don't have it with you won't get anything done anywhere.
If you lose it/it gets stolen you have an obligation to report it. We have something like SSN number (personal id number) assigned at birth but it's not enough to get a loan or anything.
I still find it hard to believe that the current Starliner doesn't have the ability to undock automatically without humans on board. The first test flight was able to do that.
That's how I'd feel. Kinda like startup life it's a chance to maybe do something you otherwise wouldn't
> ...because they were considered to contain “pornographic or indecent” material

Guess the christian bible isn't going to last long there then.

Lagniappe: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_book_burnings#/media/File...
Yes, that is it, Natural Gas. Been a long time.

But it was around the time of this bill, so it makes one wonder.
Could it be that you are applying for the wrong positions?

You haven't described the positions you interview for, so it's hard to say, but if you find the situation repeating over several jobs, it seems likely that you're applying for similar positions. If this is so, then you clearly need to stop applying for that specific kind of position.

Note that you may not realize they are similar positions, or what it is that they have in common and makes it "wrong".
Handing more & more power to a president is exactly how all of the other presidential systems in the world have collapsed into autocracy. I do not think the oil & gas industry 'owns' more than a minority of Congressmen and women, however you want to define that term. Remove the filibuster, weaken the Speaker of the House and return more power to the old committee system- that's how you empower Congress and get more legislation passed. But whatever you do do not hand more power to 1 single person. The US still has a relatively weak presidential system compared to other countries, and we should strive to stay that way

Edit to include: And this includes administrative agencies staffed by executive branch appointees. I'd like to see the Venn diagram of confused people who think 'no we shouldn't have an imperial presidency' but 'yes courts should defer to agency interpretations when the agency is run by appointees of the President'. Like The Office meme- it's the same picture!
> I don't think you can make the statement "worthy goal and definitely a market demand" without backing that up with any evidence.

Presumably the billions of dollars invested in this space would be evidence enough, or the success of things like the apple watch, or how Meta is shifting towards wearables to achieve a similar goal. I don't know what kind of "evidence" you're looking for here.

Do you have evidence this is something the market doesn't want?
This is a great breakdown and I can confirm that it closely matches my own experience with B2B tech company sales.
I'd bet there's always some set of experiments queued up, maintenance, etc.
No, it really doesn't matter. Have you never made a lemon or potato battery before?
I'd love to see the government force companies to stop treating them like an ID number that's secret.

Maybe they should allow people to request a new number any time they wish and even hold multiple SSNs. Or create a virtual number system like some credit cards have where you would give every company that asks for a SSN a unique number that only they have. It would be cool to be able to tell exactly who had the data breach when your number shows up in a dump.
As if there was not plenty of money to be done on renewables, replacing all the current fleet of automobiles, and of course all the financing that will be required to enable the green transition. As if the investor behind both industries weren't basically the same.

There are orders of magnitude more money to be made by the billionaires with a renewable based green transition than with oil. It will be the biggest transfer of wealth from the poor and middle class into the pockets of the bastardly rich in the whole history.
The lines run through Ukraine though. Seizing the station here is not necessary to stop the flow.
Thanks!

The reason sounds like a combination of cost cutting and perhaps face saving - combining the "rescue" return with a half-crew next scheduled Dragon trip.

I've got to assume there's a faster contingency plan for a real emergency - that SpaceX could scramble a Dragon launch almost immediately if they had to?
> Is it morally good to be polite to someone who wants to harm you?

It's not. People who advocate for it here are cold callers themselves.
I've been complaining about how vague and loosely defined the term "agents" is like a broken record for months. This is not going to help.
thanks for those refs!
We spoke to a former cosmonaut in HFT. He was doing well. Moved here to the US, though.
> On paper those specs definitely look game-changing to me.

The reality is that the newer processor is better in all benchmarks. Like 4-5x on the benchmarks I looked up, yes.

But back in the day, the 'turbo' frequency was only available for a few seconds for thermal and power reasons, and the 'base' clock speed was how it would actually perform on big, compute-intensive tasks.

If you only consider "8 performance cores, 2.1 GHz Base" vs "4 cores, 4.0 GHz base" and you also discount the 'efficiency cores', a person might think performance had barely changed.
The reason why it matters less than people intuitively think is precisely that it matters a lot less when you're in full control of both the operations and the types anyhow, and that's actually the most common case. Generally you are "composing" in library code, that is, just using it, not extending the library itself.

When you are extending, you actually want to choose the correct thing depending on what you need. Going the wrong direction is painful in both directions.

Personally I think one of the reasons sum types are greeted with such "oh my gosh where have you been all my life" reactions is precisely that we had type extension as our only option for so long. If we had had only sum types, and type extension was given to us for the first time in obscure languages 20 years ago and they only really started getting popular in the last 5 or so, I think they'd be considered in much the same way. Just as in a world with only screwdrivers, the invention of the hammer would be hailed as a revolution... and in a world with only hammers, the invention of the screwdriver would be hailed as a revolution. But in both cases the real mystery is how the hypothetical world got that far in the first place.

Not that they aren't useful; consider what it means that I'm analogizing them to something like a hammer and a screwdriver, not an oil filter remover or something. It is weird that we were missing one of them for as long as we were in the mainstream.
Nicely found.-

> with surface irregularity down to 100s of nm.

That is an amazing level of precision.-
> It's a flop for people who expect that after 20months, they'll get 13%-18% more.

If you have unrealistic expectations, everything, everywhere is always going to be a flop.

You're not getting 18% more IPC at 30% energy savings in a single generation. That kind of uplift hasn't been seen probably since Pentium 3 vs Pentium 4 era, or maybe Nehalem vs Core Duo.

Regardless, if you run the Zen 5 CPUs at the same TDPs as the 7000 series, you can still easily get 15-20% uplift. It's just that AMD has chosen conservative defaults for energy efficiency.

And purely for gaming, you should be waiting for X3D versions.
+1. Early screening is basically just grep for the right verbiage. As a rule, recruiters are not technical. Some of your interviewers also won’t be technical, might also be worth keeping that in mind.
This but unironically. SF was broken by gentrifying every inch of rentable property and pricing out the entire population that was supposed to serve as your untrained workforce. So now you have DARPA alumni serving you a $99 salad because they have to pay rent for their 150 sqft coffin apartment. This glorious "business" is the gory wheel that keeps such a godforsaken city going. Undervalued professionals filling jobs of necessity to pay for overpriced assets; why, it's a libertarian utopia. In such an expensive game of chicken you start to wonder who's going to blink first.

Source: I grew up in Detroit and watched this happen with tenured automotive employees instead of vegan self-made developers. You won't believe what happens next!
Fully agreed! It's really interesting how diverse their entire platform really is in the grand scheme of things. One thing I had hoped to see is one of those IL conversion projects that can make JVM bytecode and .NET bytecode co-habitate would have taken off slightly more. I guess the only real way to make those work is to either target both for WASM or implement the standard library of the respective languages in the target platforms, which is a can of worms.
I feel like I've seen that picture of the Turkish shooter over 200 times in the last week while I look for a new job on LinkedIn.
A fun thought experiment: the company loses the suit, with both actual damages and punitive damages large enough to bankrupt the company. The company is sold for parts and other companies become a little more wary of repeating the same mistakes (hopefully better security around their core business value).

This suit opens the company to discovery in which several jurisdictions get access to their books and methods, opening them up to litigation and prosecution in places like the EU.

The $2.99 check is not the only benefit I get from a class-action lawsuit.
Huh, not saying you're wrong but I can't seem to find any studies into this.

Obviously I don't want cancer on my nose, so I would actually like to see how correlated these things are.
By every account I've heard, keeping the ISS going is seriously laborious for its crew. And both astronauts have previously done regular ISS missions, to quickly get back up to speed.
Yes, I do.
You should be following de-facto real world standards, not fantasy ones. Especially if security is involved.
Thank you for pointing that out, I did a quick read through of that part and missed the intention behind it. I also found the Readme which helps explain the direction things are going. (https://github.com/fairsource/fair.io/blob/main/README.md)