skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I get that you're very passionate about this. But as soon as I start looking into your claims, I also get a strong sense that you're buying into misunderstood/filtered news that's been tenuously linked together into a compelling false narrative.

> It's not about the ethnicity of one suspect.

You'll need to give me more than that, as the timelines and events strongly suggest that this is tied to the spreading of anti-Muslim rhetoric on social media by high-profile far-right activists. Islamaphobic accounts like Europe Invasion promoted false claims that the attacker was a Muslim immigrant which were viewed over 6m times. The phrase "Muslim immigrant" was employed across far-right influencers and channels; someone even came up with a false name "Ali Al-Shakati". Mosques were a focal point of the attacks. Formerly banned Islamophobic accounts like Andrew Tate and Stephen Yaxley-Lennon got involved in stirring up and validating the hatred and legitimising the violence (protestors in Belfast and Blackpool were witnessed chanting Yaxley-Lennon's alter-ego name). This is happening less than two years after Musk gutted the teams that monitor and remove disinformation on Twitter and reinstated those two accounts. Independent thinktanks and analysts are in consensus that the misinformation spreading across twitter fuelled the violence.

That said, in a sense you're correct; it has nothing to do with the suspect's ethnicity because the attack in question was perpetrated by neither a Muslim nor an immigrant. What's happened here is that far-riight groups have seized on an opportunity and exploited their social media presense (including their newfound Twitter freedoms) in order to foment unrest and thereby self-affirm their own ideologies.

> Did you know that thousands of people have been arrested in the UK over the last few years over social media posts?

I did some research on this. Thousands of arrests have indeed been made under Section 127 of the Communications Act, although this includes any electronic communication (e.g. email as well as social media), and things like sexual offences (sending unwanted obscene images), grooming, stalking, racially aggravated hate crimes etc... . I can't find a source specifically for social media posts, but happy to take a look if you have one. This feels like an irrelevant misleading stat thrown in to muddy the waters.

> did you see the multiple instances of reporters being surrounded and intimidated (maybe even attacked) by "diverse" protesters out there

I've researched this and have been able to find one instance where a Sky news reporter's van had its tyre slashed in Birmingham while covering Muslim counter-protestors. This is abhorrent but it is nowhere near the level of callous violence being perpetrated in the protests: setting fire to buildings, destroying cars, assaulting police and civilians etc... . This also feels like an irrelevant misleading stat thrown in to muddy the waters but again I'm happy to look if you have more to evidence what you're saying.
intricate stone figures of women date back to at least 30000 years

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_figurine#Notable_figurin...
For situations when you care, go for `npm ci` instead of `npm install`. It will ensure lockfile consistency.

https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v9/commands/npm-ci
Even in such a situation – and that's actually happened before – I'd still say no and buy the product from a competitor, even if that means paying twice as much.

Also, the last time a doctors without borders person showed up, I tried pressuring her into joining a local protest a few days later until she got uncomfortable and decided to leave.

All types of forceful advertising – be that online ads or door-to-door salesmen – are absolute bullshit and shouldn't exist in a civilized society.

My doorbell is labeled "no soliciting" for a reason.
Laboratory horror stories: Poison in the agars
How does it address TCP over TCP reliability layer collision?

Reference: https://web.archive.org/web/20230310043036/http:/sites.inka....
A few probable culprits:

- plastics / microplastics

- processed food / ultra processed food

- processing / conserving chemicals

- pesticides

- GMOs

- And last, but certainly not least, a combination of all the above, at concentrations well below any "proven" toxicity level
> It’s slightly soul-crushing

You already answered.

You see yourself as a human being, but companies see you as an asset.

Assets don't have a soul, they don't need feedback, they are just assets, things to be used in their strategy to make profits.

When companies give you feedback they are just saying you are or can be useful for them to reach their goals,just that.
But the new iPads aren't running Linux ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ You asked, I gave you the only option I knew besides the pinetabs.
Well, no, the usual definition of trauma involves being "outside the normal range of human experiences". Having cancer is extremely distressing but it is not trauma.

Anyway, yours and the other answer I got confirm what I though. The word definition has indeed been widely broadened in the US.
Is the Intel "silicon degradation" problem real? Is there any chance this is also around the corner for AMD?
Aah so this is how we got the medieval version of still D.R.E.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1Uvr5v8IOE
That is a quite ironic statement considering that Twitter has been an integral part of modern social engineering to reprogram people into accepting and tolerating the intolerable and unacceptable.

So here we are, at a point where people not only self-censor, they will even get violently aggressive or simply will suppress speech or even the ability to read or hear what someone has said if it diverges from the cult rules that have been imposed on our whole civilization.
Thanks for sharing because I found this very useful advice.
Bitcoin is deflationary in the sense that the supply is fixed at 21 million. And because people also loose access to their Bitcoin wallet, the actual supply will slowly decrease.

That's just a fact of how technology works. It's better phrased as "supply of Bitcoin is fixed".

As to your other arguments: I don't really get the connecting logic or even the point your making.

What is the "spread" that will stop new people from buying Bitcoin?

Can you explain the "Tom got very rich on Bitcoin and therefore I won't buy it today even though the price goes up because reasons..." logic?

Also what does reward halving have to do with the price of Bitcoin? The mining business will eventually end but as long as Bitcoin price goes 2x by each halving, the mining is is just as profitable.

Of course Bitcoin price can collapse. It already did a couple of times. But it also recovered and then some each time.

Given that prices of anything are driven by supply and demand, supply is fixed, the only question worth asking about Bitcoin is: will the demand go up? If demand goes up, the price goes up. And vice versa.
Compusion.
> why would anyone think that this would affect anything, like AI? Why would anyone train on noname package, that noone uses?

…almost certainly for the same reason that any “train AI using only good data, reduce hallucinations!” suggestion is in the “daydream” rather than “great idea” category.

Creating high quality filtered datasets is enormously more time consuming and expensive than just dumping everything you can get you hands on in.

It seems obvious to ignore packages that are obviously unused and spam, but tldr; no idiot is going to be pouring spam into npm unless there’s some kind of benefit from it; people accidentally using it, mixing it into the dependency tree of legit packages, etc.

It’s more likely that the successful folk doing this aren’t being caught, and the ones being caught are “me too” idiots. Or, the spam is working and people are actually (for whatever incomprehensible reason) actually using at least some of the packages.

TLDR; if dependency auditing and supply chain attack were trivial to solve, it wouldn’t be a problem.

…but based on the fact that we continue endlessly to see these issues, you can assume that it’s probably more diff to solve than it trivially appears.
Social Conformity – Brain Games [video]
Isn't Mobian a debian with additionnal packages to have a mobile interface?

The mobian installation instructions are hosted on debian's wiki:
https://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn/PINE64/PineTab2
Hmmm... this is not eligible for their zero data retention policy anymore. Not sure how this will go down.
Which is really obnoxious because I can barely read the text underneath it.
No one serious is using mail merge to send transactional emails.
> test in staging as much as it is useful, and then go live with an immediate test built into the deployment toolchain, with automatic rollback in case of failure for any reason

I'm curious about the logistics of automatically testing payments after a deployment?

Does your automated test place an order with a valid, working credit card? Does your test include going through 3D Secure too? Do you then automatically cancel the order? How do you make sure that whole unusual process doesn't get blocked by unusual activity fraud detection? Whose credit card is it? Have broken tests ever lead to the test order getting fulfilled?
Any tips on how/where one can learn more on these topics? I find cryptography fascinating, but whenever I've tried looking for some resources on my own, they all flew hilariously above my head, with dozens of acronyms and terms I've never even heard of before even as a native English speaker.
One of my low-end test Macs is a 2012, 11-inch Air.

Still works great, but is capped at Catalina. I’ll have to check when it got its last update.

I use it as a Zoom machine, and it still runs the latest version of that app, just fine.

I have a first-gen iPhone Xs Max, that I’m using to test my software on iOS18. I test iOS16, on an iPhone 8 Plus. I also have an original SE, but it’s capped at iOS15, so I don’t test against it, anymore (except when I want to test really tight screen layouts). Apple kit does tend to last.
I can "divide" a single $100 bill into 100 $1 bills.

By your "logic" $1 is just as valuable as $100.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10999335
The same reason art or collector's cards or rare stamps hold value. There's nothing inherently valuable or productive about any of these asset classes. None of them will ever generate dividends. The appreciation of them is purely subjective, and if that social illusion broke down then they'd go to $0. But they have enough social proof and staying power, and enough people who are interested in the aesthetic or community, that the belief in them as a store of value has become a self-fulfilling prophecy. It's more of a social phenomenon than anything to do with finance or economics.

There's also the utility explanation (or the bet that it will be useful in the future), which is probably another part of it.
Neither of those generally results in <1% light reflectance however.
As others in this thread have mentioned, semantic/vector-based solutions tend to be much better when any of the following is true:

1. There are natural language questions being asked
2. There's ambiguity in any of the query terms but which there's more clarity if you understand the term in context of nearby terms (e.g. "I studied IT", "I saw the movie It", "What is it?")
3. There are multiple languages in either the query or the documents (many embedding models can embed to a very similar vector across languages)
4. Where you don't want to maintain giant synonym lists (e.g. user might search for or document might contain "movie" or "film" or "motion picture")

Whether you need any of those depends on your use case. If you are just doing e.g. part number search, you probably don't need any of this, and certainly not semantic/vector stuff.

But semantic/vector systems don't work well with terms that weren't trained in. e.g. "what color is part NY739DCP?" Fine tuning is bad at handling this (fine tuning is generally good for changing the format of the response, and generally not all that good for introducing or curtailing knowledge). Whether you need a keyword search system depends on whether your information are more of the "general knowledge" type or something more specific to your business.

Most companies have some need for both because they're building a search on "their" data/business, and you want to combine the results to make sure you're not duplicating. But I'll say I've seen a lot of companies get this sort of combination business wrong. Keeping 2 datastores completely in sync is wrought with failure, the models all have different limitations than the keyword system limitations which is good in some ways but can cause unexpected results in others, and the actual blending logic (be it RRF or whatever) can be difficult to implement "right."

I usually recommend folks look to use a single system for combining together these results as opposed to trying to invent yourself. Full disclosure: I work for Vectara (vectara.com) which has a complete pipeline that does combine both a neural/vector system and traditional keyword search, but I would recommend that folks look to combine these into a single system even if they didn't use our solution because it just takes so much operational complexity off the table.
> Have you examined the logic of this position?

Yes.

> You legitimately see an entire country as a "comic book villain?

Not an entire country. The leadership of the country, yes.

> And this seems rational and is a justified reason to send conscripted civilians to their deaths?

I'm not sending anyone. If the people of Ukraine decides it is time to stop defending themselves I will accept their decision with a sad resignation.

> So much so that it "satisfies" you?

Yes. It satisfies me that we are on the good side of this conflict. Would satisfy me even more if the conflict were not happening. But spending my tax money to help people protect themselves is much better, much more satisfying than the usual status quo which is to spend my tax money to hurt innocents.

Eagerly awaiting your further questions on the topic.
We have been blocked a couple of times during they years, usually using proxy has been enough. We try to reach out to the stores and try to establish a friendly relationship. The feelings have been mixed depending on what store we are talking to
This feels like the more important takeaway (and feels like an actual security bug), I'm surprised this so buried in the article...
Uber Eats and Deliveroo all have list prices that are 15-20+% above the shelf price in the same supermarket. Plus a delivery fee, plus the "service charge", I've _never_ found it to be competitive let alone cheaper.
Huawei made network monitor so sensitive it spotted impact of single faulty chip
When I was a kid, going to a restaurant was a treat and a privilege. If my sister or I misbehaved, we were taken out to the car, and might not get to go to a restaurant again for a while.

I see kids in restaurants these days and mostly find their behavior appalling. And it's sad the best-behaved kids are only quiet because they have an iPad in front of them. (No headphones, of course, so that's another annoyance the rest of us have to put up with.)
RuoYi: A Lightweight, Elegant Permission Management System with SpringBoot
They are not assumptions and I'm not here to publish a paper. I'm asking for clarification on a statement. Are you also trying to tell me genetics, lifestyle and basically any difference we humans have can't affect side-effects? What data do you have for that ridiculous claim?
That's not what "hallucination" is. Hallucinations in LLMs are when they unexpectedly and confidently extrapolate outside of their training set when you expected them to generate something interpolated from their training set.

In your example that's just a pollution of the training set by spam, but that's not that much of an issue in practice, as AI has been better than humans at classifying spam for over a decade now.
Carles Puigdemont risks arrest with bid to sneak back into Spain
Opera GX [Satire]
> been irreconcilable and there is now consensus on how to bridge the gap

Suspect the "is now consensus" should be "is no consensus" :)
Key management is a black box controlled by them. Encryption itself is pointless if they can be compelled to give up the key.
Looks like it was relaxed in 2008 to up to 200% of input at up to 10kph/6mph then taper to zero at 24kph/15mph, yeah it is kind of restrictive.

I think equal power part is not too complicated to implement, with a load-bearing "just" you just sync synchronous motor driver to the rotor phase and limit current upstream. I believe a prototype also has to be brought to some office to get certified. Frankly it's all par for the course for a Japanese regulation; engineering cost is considered free and everything is supposed to be approved by someone official-ish.
I'm a 30-40 year old with absolutely no interest in making music, but I want every single thing which crosses my news feed from Teenage Engineering. So yeah, that checks out.
You think it's reasonable for companies worldwide to be bound by US law? Companies doing business in the US, sure, but random hosting companies? Do you also expect US companies to honor takedown requests according to North Korean law?
There were ways around this. C functions in the standard library could easily be marked noexcept, for one. Extern C could also imply noexcept. Also, explicit try/catch blocks could be required when calling a potentially-throwing function from a noexcept function - slightly annoying, but not a huge problem in practice.

Overall this was just another case of the C++ community's preference for speed over safety and robustness. Nothing new, but still a shame to see that the attitude hasn't changed at all.
I’ve only ever used alkylate fuel in the saws
Study backer: Catastrophic takes on Agile overemphasize new features
Make Networks that fulfill human potential
Companies only comply with laws that are _enforced_ and/or where compliance doesn't cost them anything.

Laws whose enforcement is lacking or compliance would be against their business model are routinely ignored. See the GDPR as an example.
Oops, you're right, I hadn't checked that this had changed in C++ 17.
We're talking about a collaboration tool here, and there is no jurisdiction that I know of where employing such tools, even when mandated by the employer, is unlawful; definitely not related to GDPR which is completely out of scope here.

Of course, as any tool can be used for bad things, so if, say, instead of the default sharing of just the development apps, the employee shares his browser, email client or instant messenger which he uses for personal purposes, you could argue it crosses the line into unlawful workplace surveillance, so it becomes a matter of setting correct policies. Sounds to me like an enterprise feature set you could charge for, as complement to the free tier.
The majority (dare I say all?) of European kids just take public transport/their bikes to wherever they're going, from a young age. I took the bus 1.5 hours 1 direction every day to go to my swim practice starting from age 10, sometimes at night too.

I don't really think soccer moms are a thing outside of the US
You weren't actually posing a hypothetical though, but presenting this line item as a fact (and then imagining how that'd invalidate a bunch of criticism of Apple, which is the part that seemed to go into fanfic).
It's an x86 laptop without the keyboard (clip-on keyboard is an optional extra). On the plus side, that means it's just as easy to install a different OS as any laptop.

1.98lb = 0.89811289 Kilogram
>>Never be an *ss in front of anyones kids.

My personal principle always is to be polite with everybody. Like that's default mode of operation. No matter what you do with them. You might not buy from them, you might not hire from them, you might even want to keep distance from them. That should have no nothing to do with how you talk with them.

Separate speaking from doing.
late 17th century: from Greek, literally ‘wound’

- a deeply distressing or disturbing experience.

What's your definition.
That would be a clear violation of the npm Unpublish Policy[0]. If all it takes is some spam and pissing people off to walk away from principles, they never meant anything. A proper response needs to not break expectations like this.

[0]: https://docs.npmjs.com/policies/unpublish
We received some harsh words in the start but everything we are doing is legally and by the book.

We try to establish good relationship with the stores as the customers don't always focus on the price, but sometimes they want a specific product. We are both helping the stores and the customers to find each other. We have sent million of users over the years to the stores (not unique of course as there are only 9 million people living in Sweden)
How does it compare to the other super-black materials, the Vantablacks and the like?
Magic hexagons exist. We want Parker hexagons now.
No love for the long s¹ when using a medieval font :(.

¹ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_s
Study: Turning Unused Signals Such as Wi-Fi into Energy for Electronics
Did you know it before reading the article?

If not, then yes, it's news. As in: new information.

What you're probably trying to say is that it's not valuable information.

Maybe it isn't.

However the belief in automated trading being some kind of God-like force in trading that vanquishes all other opponents, while common, seems to me very unfounded.

If it was possible to build automated trading to feed off a simple signal like put / call ration then everyone would do it and then no-one would have any edge.

The thing about markets is that there are many participants and they believe different things.

Some people believe that this particular signal predicts something about future prices and some believe it doesn't.

You make money if your believes prove correct. You make most money if your believes prove correct while most other market participants believe the opposite.

For example, if you believed in Bitcoin 5 years ago, you made a killing.

If you believe in Bitcoin today, you'll make money if you're right about demand for Bitcoin going up. And if you'll make money, then you'll probably make a killing because even today most people do not believe in Bitcoin.
The article ends flat and abruptly, I was setting myself for a long and nice journey in the style of Quanta Magazine, what happened?
It's a Ragdoll Cat
Which is one of the big problems with the DMCA, it effectively lets companies/individuals shut down those they don't like at critical points without any court involvement with effectively no negative consequences for abusing that. It's an extremely biased law, even compared to how unfair copyright is to begin with.
Harnessing Generative AI for Sustainable Food Systems Innovation
That's not allowed. The motor cannot put in more energy than the pedeling does. Thus the motor can at best double your power.
To answer the first question:

Yes and Intel has confirmed it. It should be fixed now but too high voltages can damage CPUs permanently so it probably means a lot of warrabty claims

See https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intel-cpu-in...

The problem is unlikely to be around the corner for AMD since they do not have to supply as much voltage to their chips as as Intel to keep up since they are - at least when it comes to x86 chips - currently leading in performance and power efficiency
The original notice was not a DMCA takedown even if Buttflare's email describes it as such. DMCA is for copyright infringement, but this is a (claimed) trademark dispute.
China is the largest market for chips by a pretty big margin
“Contrary to what many believe, U.S. corporate law does not impose any enforceable legal duty on corporate directors or executives of public corporations to maximize profits or share price.”