skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hi

Have you looked into these two?

- Trustworthy Online Controlled Experiments by Kohavi, Tang, and Xu

- Statistical Methods in Online A/B Testing by Georgi Georgiev

Recommended by stats stackexchange
(https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/546617/how-can-i-l...)

There's a bunch of other books/courses/videos on o'reilly.

Another potential way to approach this learning goal is to look at Evan's tools (https://www.evanmiller.org/ab-testing/) and go into each one and then look at the JS code for running the tools online.

See if you can go through and comment/write out your thoughts on why it's written that way. of course, you'll have to know some JS for that, but it might be helpful to go through a file like (https://www.evanmiller.org/ab-testing/sample-size.js) and figure out what math is being done.
It is indeed a terrible library on multiple levels. Get rid of it. Just use the "native" Python SDK for the LLMs you are using for your POC.
/r/PiHole

I run four, locally [50+ users].

Local DNS Server issues default lookup server @x.x.x.2 (e.g. minimal blocklist PageAd, CloudFare), for maximal client compatibility.

Users can thereafter upgrade levels of blocking by manually increasing DNS IP +1 (e.g. x.x.x.3 for stricter blocking, whereas default x.2 only blocks seven very common trackers), at host-level.

They can also manually enter x.x.x.1 and thereafter have no DNS-restrictions [this is the router itself, which each x.x.x.N itself resolves to, via our ISP's own DNS serverlist].

Our x.x.x.5 is top-notch white-page browsing, but many applications won't work (e.g. banking; although surprisingly Youtube still works although you do have to watch pre-roll ads).

I have one user who there-after has his own local subnet/PiHole, although you can hop-up to PiHoles, as long as the subnet is a child or sibling of that DNS-resolver.
This is no different from any other ML situation, though? Famously, people found out that Amazon's hands free checkout thing was being offloaded to people in the cases where the system couldn't give a high confidence answer. I would be shocked to know that those judgements were not then labeled and used in automated training later.

And I should say that I said "codified" but I don't mean just code. Labeled training samples is fine here. Doesn't change that finding a model that will give good answers is ultimately something that can be conceptualized as a search.

You are also blurring the reinforcement/scoring at inference time as compared to the work that is done at training time? The idea of using RL at training time is not just because it is expensive there. The goal is to find the policies that are best to use at inference time.
Terrible article, as expected from Matt Stoller.

"With this position, Apple uses its outsized buying power to squeeze the margins of its suppliers such as Foxconn, leading to poor pay and terrible working conditions in Chinese factories."

So Foxconn is either choosing to not do business with Apple's competitors who would pay more (??), or the competitors can't place orders of the magnitude that Apple can and Foxconn workforce would just be smaller with a lot less people being employed.

The intellectual dishonesty in the argumentation is so bad that I'm pretty sure I'll skip future Matt Stoller articles.
AMD is not the market leader in any segment, by any approximation: https://www.theregister.com/2024/05/10/amd_gains_on_intel/
Indeed. I try hard to minimize the amount of Helm we use, but a significant amount of tools are only shipped as Helm charts. Fortunately I'm increasingly seeing people provide "raw k8s" yaml, but it's far from universal.
ScriptBot – AI for Creators
Clinics are pretty good. But in general, if you’re a woman in a first world nation your odds of getting it are really low, unless you do significant amounts of anal sex with bisexual men or inject drugs.

Same thing with men. Straight men aren’t at much risk. Bi and gay men are at high risk.

If you have a hiv+ partner, prep is good enough to keep you safe. Just take it always as prescribed.

Pep in for when you may have been exposed, and you need to get it as soon as possible. It’s like a morning after pill. Within 72 hours of exposure but sooner is better.

Then for anyone who does unprotected casual sex, there’s doxypep which reduces likelihood of bacterial stds by a lot, so gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis.

If you want a person to explain this to you in real life, there’s different clinics in every American city that would love to take the time to teach you about all of this. Part of their funding is to educate
> and there's consequence to mismanagemen

Except if you're a company so large that the government has no choice but to bail you out in a crisis.
true, this phd is pseudoscience.
as I was reading the article I was thinking "Oh, you mean labeling your goals differently will cause you to think about them differently and hence, will cause you to plan differently". That is, there would be something tangible that would be different.

So I tuned in to learn more about the technique but I was disappointed to learn that there's nothing more to it at least in the article.

It just suggests to re-label your goals differently and think of them as "quests", but it doesn't mention anything more.

I really want to learn how to make my chores and boring goals fun so that I can go about them doing them. Can anyone please shed some light on this?

I have tried to gamify my work but it hasn't worked for me.
The claim why these aren't adopted is that they aren't high enough quality. Why not include both a standard and undersceen front-facing camera and get the best of both worlds? Could use the under-screen camera for video chat and the standard one for everything else. Or even use some AI algorithm to merge the data from the standard camera with the under-screen one to increase quality.
New visualization for ROS 2 systems: Call for datasets
While distribution is the biggest thing, yes the number of well functioning apps is limited.
Plenty ones in appstore that only half work.
> All you need is a way to roll out your artifact to production in a roll over or blue green fashion after the preparations such as required database alterations be it data or schema wise.

Easier said than done.

You can start by implementing this yourself and thinking how simple it is. But then you find that you also need to decide how to handle different environments, configuration and secret management, rollbacks, failover, load balancing, HA, scaling, and a million other details. And suddenly you find yourself maintaining a hodgepodge of bespoke infrastructure tooling instead of your core product.

K8s isn't for everyone. But it sure helps when someone else has thought about common infrastructure problems and solved them for you.
What are the statistics of this? Given how low sales of metal straws are, presumably this is much more likely than getting struck by lighting?

But probably much less likely than being run over by a car?
Chinese boards are both cheaper and have usb type c implemented correctly and in spec, so that's no real excuse for raspberry pi
TFA states extensive 300Mhz OC with no special effort (and he's been evaluating pre-release versions for a year).

"It overclocks insanely well. I’ve been running the device at 300MHz in all of my projects with no issues at all."

Also

"Disclaimer:
I was not paid or compensated for this article in any way. I was not asked to write it. I did not seek or obtain any approval from anyone to say anything I said. My early access to the RP2350 was not conditional on me saying something positive (or anything at all) about it publicly."
I think some are just pretty sick and tired of the explosion of needless complexity we've seen in the last decade or so in software, and rightly so. This is an industry-wide problem of deeply misaligned incentives (& some amount of ZIRP gold rush), not specific to this particular case - if this one is even a good example of this to begin with.

Honestly, as it stands, I think we'd be seen as pretty useless craftsmen in any other field due to an unhealthy obsession of our tooling and meta-work - consistently throwing any kind of sensible resource usage out of the window in favor of just getting to work with certain tooling. It's some kind of a "Temporarily embarrassed FAANG engineer" situation.
Roger, thanks for checking. I remember that limit as what Apple advertised for development, but I never actually tested it myself. Maybe Apple reduced it to two at the driver level for consistency too, who knows.
I think what’s going on behind the verbal sleight of hand here, is focusing on the process (quest) instead of the outcome (goal). It’s the difference between doing a thing and having done a thing. I might enjoy having written a book, but I don’t think I would enjoy writing a book. And I don’t think calling it a quest instead of a goal would make much difference
> when the competition is selling $100 smartphones at a loss

That is actually terrifying, because logic dictates they make up profit in other ways. I can imagine how an ad company or nation state can go about it.
It’s hardly consolidated compared to Germany??
Firings for performance do not entitle an employee to severance,

This keeps getting repeated on this thread but its not true. U.S. WARN laws require severance or 60 days notice for mass layoffs (which would definitely include 5% of a company as large as GM). Only terminations for cause are exempted, and performance is only grounds for cause in a very small handful of "right to work" states.
On current AMD processors, there is absolutely downside to running two DIMMs per channel. That's the discussion we're having here.
> it's written by a company that nearly got sold to Adobe for $20 billion

(Apologies if this is a dumb question) but isn't Figma big enough to want to do any of their stuff on their own hardware yet? Why would they still be paying AWS rates?

Or is it the case that a high-profile blog post about K8S and being provider-agnostic gets you sufficient discount on your AWS bill to still be value-for-money?
I think it’s about the same level of difficulty as showing you need at least four, but yeah I agree that what is written is insufficient. One solution is that you can write

2002 = 10^3 + 10^3 + 1^3 + 1^3

Then, multiply through by 2002^2001, which is itself a cube since 2001 is divisible by 3.
Are you saying AI and Gemini specifically is "over-hyped"?

If so I does seem people are moving to that opinion and I hope to make generational wealth in shorting Nvidia at just the right time.
People move to K8s so that their resumes and job ads are cloud provider agnostic. Peoples careers stagnate when their employers platform on a home baked tech, or on specific offerings from cloud providers. Employers find Mmoving to a common platform makes recruiting easier.
It’s one of those technologies where there’s merit to use them in some situations but are too often cargo culted.
I wonder to what ends trademark protections reach.

Firsthand example, both SpaceX and Subaru have services called Starlink. Subaru Starlink was first, but SpaceX Starlink is more famous. I've been confused and I've seen others be confused by the two.
That functionality is absolutely non-trivial. There are a few WiFi cores (digital and RF) you can license but they are expensive and the analog part uses a lot of die area. If you look up die shots from the ESP chips, you see that the radio is more than half of the die.

Espressif apparently has their own WiFi implementation, which makes sense as they are a major vendor of very cheap tablet and cell phone WiFi radios. This is likely why they can offer that feature so cheaply.

Bluetooth Low Energy is way simpler BTW.
> Evidently people don't pay attention to what is said and will go off and do their own thing.

It's almost like that was the intention. It's weird how the ad doesn't prominently show the eggs, beans, etc. and talk about how great they are, and instead focuses on how you can totally eat cookies for breakfast!

Here's an example:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnvHUXssIAo

"Not Candy! Resees Puffs cereal!"

It is candy. Like 1/3 of the mass is added sugar, and the other 2/3 is more carbs. And what's the complete breakfast that goes with it? Two slices of white-bread toast, a glass of milk, and a glass of juice. Even the "complete" breakfast is garbage. The bowl almost certainly has more than the 1 cup serving as well.

The purpose of this commercial is not to inform you about how to use their product as part of a healthy diet (because it isn't a part of a healthy diet). It is to turn your brain off and get you to buy something that you intuitively know is not appropriate. People received the intended message.

Even if they did show their product as a small side (rather than a centerpiece) of an otherwise healthy breakfast, it's still ridiculous to suggest that you should be giving your kids candy with any regularity.

My oldest kid is 3, and I don't think she has had an Oreo. Will she before she's 18? Probably. Has she had some other treats? Sure. But it's not at all a regular thing. It's certainly not part of a daily diet.
Intel should have produced ARM chips for Apple as a foundry. If they’re to be wildly successful again, they will be doing this anyway. They gave up 18+ years out of x86 pride and bad leadership. I hope Gelsinger can beat TSMC at the process technology game and win Apple’s business.
In PCs, ARM CPUs perform just as good or better than AMD64 but have much better battery life. In the cloud, ARM CPUs are much cheaper (ca. 25% less) for the same or better performance.
>Enjoy your impending future data leak.

I want everyone to have my DNA information.

It cannot be used to harm me.

I have already actually and literally given it away. You yourself can download it.

And I don't need to lie about what an article contains to try and scare people.

Like you did.

You stopped acting in good faith the moment you lied.

You lied about the content of the link you posted, probably thinking that I wouldn't read it. But I did read it, the link YOU YOURSELF posted, and I discovered you lying about what it contained.

Because you are a liar.

And I respond to liars with ridicule.

edit: note to the civility police-- none of the above statements are personal attacks, they are statements of fact based on evidence posted directly by the person being responded to of his or her own free will, available for public observation on a website designed to allow for responses. The person I am responding to is irrefutably and unquestionably a liar who lied about the content of a link he or she posted. It was not a mistake, omission, misinterpretation, or anything else-- it was a lie.
If you are only willing to drop exact duplicates, why not just take a file hash of everything as your starting point? Delete all but one of the collisions.
n=1 can be important if the effect size is good. What makes this n=10 (per group) is interesting and not insignificant is that there is 100% response for blood platelets "enhanced stimulus-dependent release of the platelet dense granule marker serotonin (P<0.0001 for TRAP6 [thrombin activator peptide 6] and P=0.004 for ADP) and the platelet α-granule marker CXCL4 (C-X-C motif ligand-4; P<0.0001 for TRAP6 and P=0.06 for ADP)"

There are other studies n = 1,157, n = 2,149, n = 833 and article links to some of them.

See my other comment to see better discussion and links to studies.
The difference appears in failure. 100,000 companies can bankrupt before reaching a single $1 trillion company and that's just markets working as intended. But the government doesn't get that failure mode, at least it's generally not approved of. Apple wasn't, and isn't, the only company trying to be in their position, but they are one of the few trillion dollar companies.
Google's horrible naming in full effect. What model version is this, is their GPT4o/Claude3.5 Sonnet level model? Excited to give it a shot!
Ideally, I'd like to hear that you at least looked at my web site and had some kind of interest in the domain of what we do.

I actually try instead to work the conversation around rather than just bluntly coming out and asking a dumb question like that. But that's how I interpret it when the question is asked of me.

I don't rule people out just because all they're looking for is a job. It's just nice to hear that they did some kind of research before showing up.
And the thing is there is plenty of new content targeting that generation that is very good. There is a lot of changes in cultural values and norms that just aren’t captured by all our old 1980’s movies. For example views on gender, race and sexuality are wildly different than what we encountered as 80’s kids. Not to mention socioeconomic and geopolitical changes too.

That isn’t to say that 1980’s movies are garbage. Far from it. It’s just like the parent said… trying to get 12 year old me into old junk like pink panther or whatever cartoons were watched in the boomer era.

I mean hell, half the plot lines in older shows don’t work if everybody has a powerful internet connected computer in their pocket.
>How would reshoring chip production be easier if Apple weren't out there buying chips?

Because Apple's dominant position as a monopsonist means it has price setting power and depresses the profits in the chip industry, making all but the cheapest locations effectively unsustainable. Monopsonists essentially absorb the profits of their suppliers. This is for example why nationalized health services are cheap.
Erotic Interactive Games – Outdoors
> ECS deploys are pretty painless and uncomplicated

Unfortunately in my experience, this is true until it isn't. Once it isn't true, it can quickly become a painful blackbox debugging exercise. If your org is big enough to have dedicated AWS support then they can often get help from engineers, but if you aren't then life can get really complicated.

Still not a bad choice for most apps though, especially if it's just a run-of-the-mill HTTP-based app
> Ultrabooks aren't a terrible concept; they're the Wintel version of Macbook Airs.

I'd say both are a terrible concept. I mean, it sells, but it's still terrible. A laptop being thin is not really such a virtue and people's life would be better with a decent-travel keyboard, better heat dissipation and more ports than with 5-10mm less laptop height.
TIL.

Doesn’t work at gas station though.
> Feels like a hit piece.

The title tends to give this impression, to be honest.
Code is read more often than written but dynamically typed languages exist:)
They just slept for a decade... I had an overclocked i7 3970k (2012) and there was no need to update for 8 years. The perfomance increase was always marginal. I finally pulled the trigger when AVX happened.
There is an extensive network of Greyhound busses, most people just prefer to take their own cars.
I observe that the question is focused on “should”, not “how”. So my first question is less about the “how” and I am more curious about whether differentiated tech builds your competitive advantage?

Suspect you can further differentiate with a bespoke team, then defer to others on how to execute.
No one will make that mistake again.
It's also worth mentioning that the economics of software may be very painful. Right now, the cost of building all that software is being shared across all the customers of this company. OP is proposing his/her company bears the entirety of it.

Assume you can hire good sr engineers. This project badly needs some scoping to figure out how much eng time and how much risk it will take to replace what exists.

I've worked on software for small-run scientific instruments: think 200 to 400 sold. The cost of software can be 30% of the total cost of the projects. It may well be that, given what customers are willing to pay, there isn't enough money in this to build good software.

And for OP, for core software, if customers interact with it as well, you likely need follow-the-sun ops too.
We changed the url from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical_S-expressions to a non-Wikipedia article. (Wikipedia submissions are fine but if there's a good third-party source, those are usually preferred because they're less generic.)

Readers may want to look at both of course!
80 years are not so far in time for me as I recently realized that when I was born I was closer to the end of the war than my current age. That made me feel somehow more connected to that past event than to the present.
For me, the killer feature in vertical tab extensions (STG, Sidebery) is the ability to distribute tabs in groups by URLs automatically. I wonder if FF is going to support this natively.
Monopolies are measured according to market share, not profit share.
Monopoly is not the same as anti-competitive tactics: monopoly is simply a control of a market segment, and while GP was using it a bit freely, affluent phone users are certainly a market segment.

A monopoly using anti-competitive tactics attracts regulatory review, but anti-competitive tactics are forbidden for both small and large companies.
Why would you assume it's lip-service?

Being vendor-locked into ECS means you must pay whatever ECS wants... using k8s means you can feasibly pick up and move if you are forced.

Even if it doesn't save money today it might save a tremendous amount in the future and/or provide a much stronger position to negotiate from.
I would like nothing better than watching the FTC take a scalpel to Apple.

The vivisection of the PC division, the semiconductors, iOS, iPhone, and iPad into separate companies would be deeply satisfying.

Shareholders might actually applaud the results in the end.
Market leader in what? Intel's Q2 revenue is over double that of AMD's. Intel still controls well over 60% of the x86 space. Intel and AMD's most performant x86 offerings are fairly close to each other.
Point taken.

Do tools such as Crap4j exist for other platforms? It measures the amount of CRAP (Change Risk Analysis and Predictions) in your code. Cyclomatic complexity is one of its big measures for determining CRAP. What's nice about having a tool is there are no arguments. The first step on a pull request is determining whether the code is CRAP!

Most organizations quickly outgrow the need for such a tool, but yours might be one that would benefit. You'd be amazed at how objective social pressure works on a dev team, though beware, you may have problems if your team's Primadona consistently produces CRAP code!

Edit: Link to Crap4j - http://www.crap4j.org/
Intel was the last company to have domestic leading edge fabs and they used to be one of (the?) highest volume producers by wafer count so they're a pretty big part of any conversation about US semiconductor manufacturing. Another is AMD and their fab spinout as GlobalFoundries, and why GF stopped at 12nm.
Take the package and continue working as an external consultant/contractor :)
Well, I'm reluctant to give him the benefit of the doubt because he also says "we don't know what's on the back side of the Moon" despite the fact that the agency he heads mapped the far side of the Moon decades ago.
They have to be able to mass produce on that node for it to save them. Samsung has been claiming technological leadership for that past few years with their 3nm node but nothing has come to market using it. IBM demoed a 2nm test chip in 2021, but has no ability to mass produce.
I've seen situations in the past where the same flight number referred to multiple flights between endpoints that had no apparent relationship to each other. I've also seen a single flight number refer to a flight from A to B to C, but used a different aircraft to get from A to B than from B to C. I can't find any examples at the moment though so maybe the airlines have stopped that particular insanity.

Also, airlines regularly make minor tweaks to their schedules. It's possible that what you saw was one of those tweaks taking effect.
> Also it would be quite scary if apple is allowed that type of vertical integration.

Scary in what way?