skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Those aren't so much layers as the different parts, and OSCP is how notarization actually provides security, the developer cert is what's being checked to run the app.

This scheme isn't really designed to prevent attacks so to speak, it's to stop the malicious software on everyone's system all at once. You can say theoretically it's too late because the software is already doing what it's doing and you should consider the machine compromised. But the rubber meets the road for regular users who aren't going to wipe their machines in response to malware and so this lets you purge it.

I don't think I'm confused about admin vs root. I'm talking about the System Administrator user, The oops I ran malware with sudo user, uid 0, the user who is only constrained by the kernel via SIP. But yeah, admin is the more common use-case for regular users and I'm not sure the point you're making, malware can get admin and if you put the preference somewhere changeable by admin then welp. You could put the preference in recovery mode same as SIP, I think that would be fine.
If it's truly a matter of ambiguity then the court is not adjudicating an inconsistency, it is inserting is own judgement about what the other party (Congress) said - when the other party has the ability to assert its intentions directly.
They spent $100B in the last decade buying back their own stock. Imagine if some of that went to this issue instead. Or making sure bolts were tight on doors.
SSNs have always been clear that they’re identifiers, not authenticators - it’s printed on the card! The problem are the businesses who tried to skimp by treating them as secrets, and they invented the mainstream concept of identity theft to make it sound like their negligence should be your problem.

The fix should be simple: stop taking companies seriously when they only used an SSN for authentication. Ideally there’d be a law adding penalties: try to bill someone for a loan authenticated only by common metadata and they have to pay the target a penalty fine, allow insurers to deny claims, etc. As soon as it costs them money, they’d suddenly find the money to check ID like everyone else.
Pure CSS implementation of Google Photosimage layout (2016)
According to me I'm 100ft tall and owed all your wealth... why are we taking Ketamine man at his word?
Agreed! But for most of our customers, they want to separate their OLTP Postgres from their Search Postgres. This is because query patterns differ, and you want to tune Postgres and choose hardware differently. This also provides higher reliability and ensures search queries can't slow down transactions.

ParadeDB implements this by ingesting logical replication (WALs) from the primary Postgres. This gives a "closely coupled" solution, where you have the feel of a single Postgres database (ParadeDB is essentially an extra read replica in your Postgres HA setup). More here: https://docs.paradedb.com/replication/pg_search
What do people think of openstack in terms of transference of knowledge and skills? I realize it’s not as scalable as the others.
Start with AWS Cognito and then just go from there.
I think I'm trying to advocate for appropriate geoengineering, thinking about not just water removal but also how water should be removed (how quickly, where to concentrate water, atmospheric considerations)

At the least I'm trying to advocate for say, pairing a French drain design with a rain garden or something to slow water down. In some areas they actually incentivize planting trees close to sewer drain areas since it helps manage water during flood events.

Not trying to be pollyanna and advocate for a sponge city approach evrywhere either, I'm aware of the issues with permeable pavement potentially leading to sinkholes and such (ref: https://x.com/waterhodl/status/1660307940451000320 )
Admittedly, I've done 99% of my development to target Linux, and just happen to use a Mac for its simpler and less time-consuming day-to-day GUI management.

This is the first time I've tried to develop something to target a macOS installation -- and it was a train-wreck.
SpaceX mission to space station delayed as Boeing tries to bring astronauts home
> Specialising is only possible in larger companies (more than 500 employees).

I think it depends on the company. You get niches at 10 employees.

> A smaller company might want to hire a backend expert, but who might have to jump into front-end for short periods - sort of an 80-20 split.

Yeah, like I mentioned, I don't mind that. At one company, I ported our network daemon to Windows XP.
Well, technically, if you show them the door, you failed to get them implied in the business aspect.

But also, the bad scrum situation exist EXACTLY because it's a strategy to push devs to get implied in the business aspect. Or rather, the "good" scrum situation evolves into a bad scrum situation because the devs did not took the opportunity when pushed to get implied in the business aspect.

I also find it strange and funny that some people are being so upset that a bad scrum situation exists, which is way less violent that showing them the door. If the bad scrum situation is too bad for you, you can always leave, which is equivalent to showing you the door. But hopefully, you can also take the initiative to be more engaged with the business side, which will have the consequence of making the bad scrum situation disappear. It is strange to blame people who try to avoid the most drastic situation of firing people.
Lincoln, Nebraska
Well I appear to not be shadowbanned if this comment shows up so I must of been reported to death. I can see why, and it was a silly thing to say, but after a long day of nothing but solving deep bugs in a terrible tech stack I have little control of, while getting virtually no praise by the organization for my work, mindlessly flipping burgers seemed pretty nice.
Lockheed has Orion, they could modify it for Vulcan or Falcon. Overkill for LEO but at least it's functional. Realistically NASA will have to go through another round of requests for proposal, though I don't know how much interest there will be after Boeing's troubles and with ISS disposal looming.
Why can’t this be done with functions? I don’t see why you need the complexity and unpredictability of using “agents” to do that.

I might be missing something?
It's extremely unprofessional they don't send generic rejections using some applicant tracking system.

IMHO, organizations that behave like this tend to be dysfunctional. I am sure they are also more likely to ignore customer complaints, etc.
To be a currency, you need inflation. Otherwise you have an asset. We can see this from European history: before 1492 it was common to hoard gold as if it was gems, rubies, sapphires. It had limited use as a currency, and only at the highest levels of the economy, never at local levels -- it was traded among the very wealthy, the same as assets might be traded among the very wealthy. Only after 1492, when gold and silver started to pour in from the New World, did gold and silver become useful as everyday currencies. The French historian, Fernand Braudel, spoke of the "the price revolution of the 1500s" because inflation managed to average 1% a year for the whole century, which was likely the longest and largest sustained inflation in history up till that time. It was that inflation that gave birth to the modern world, and gave us a world of currencies and wage-work. Because crypto lacks inflation, it cannot be used as a currency. It will remain an asset.
I beg to differ. One of the characters isn't even in the English alphabet!
No, the Shuttle post-Columbia. The use case was that in case an orbiter sustained irreparable tile damage on launch, the crew would hole up in the ISS for weeks until a rescue Shuttle could be launched.

But it was still worth seeing if the damaged orbiter could re-enter and land, so they developed the cable (stored at the ISS) and software to allow an unmanned orbiter to allow that. Obviously was never used.
Chinese retroconsoles aren't that expensive but some "collectors" have a serious case of GAS

If you dont believe me check r/SBCgaming
That name is not in English, as evidenced by the non-English letter.
Just shot you an email, would love to pick your brain on the sales side of startups.
PrEP - An HIV negative person taking Truvada or Descovy once a day to prevent HIV infection.

PEP - An HIV negative person taking a course of antiretrovirals within 72 hours after exposure to HIV to prevent HIV infection.

This article is referring to injectable PrEP. This is already available via an injection every two months and is typically used in populations that can't be expected to take a pill every day (drug addicts, etc.). The article is referring to a new form of injectable PrEP that extends this to once every six months.
This dongle won't provide enough power for the drive on a modern MBP:

https://www.apple.com/shop/product/MW5L3AM/A/usb-c-to-usb-ad...

This dongle will provide enough power:

https://www.apple.com/shop/product/MW5M3AM/A/usb-c-digital-a...

$70 is a lot for a dongle, but a lot cheaper than a whole new computer.
I’d love to know your experience.
I’m a 20 something with a degenerative joint disease in my hips (yikes!) which means at my diagnosis (early 20s), I could only manage to walk about a kilometre, with severe pain collapsing hips occasionally. All this due to Tumour ridden cartilage, and very thin/no cartilage in some areas.

Funnily enough, I’ve had a mindset shift lately and have been walking shorter distances, but much more often, + leg strengthening exercises and Pilates, and now I can walk about 5kms in one trip.

In my experience, I don’t know if I’ve somehow healed some cartilage, but something had changed
Very cool! I was about to work on something similar inspired by my NYC apartment hunt.

I'd HIGHLY recommend advertising to the NYC renters market if you haven't already.

Often it's the one with the least amount of info and there's a lot of well to do people who won't mind paying for this.
I've never seen this. At all startups I've been at, there were either frontend, backend, or FS people, but the separation and ownership was clear. They wouldn't waste a Java Dev's time assigning them CSS stuff, that's just dumb. There's always little tech debt to start with on backend too.
That pesky L...
Yeah, or just not "engage" with anyone. Manage risk, assume unknown or not completely trustworthy = positive.
It's right smack in the Tenderloin
Connect to your own LLM on iOS/Android
My brain really likes how organizes C# libs tend to be compared to the 50 different organization schemes I deal with in node and python
There's an interesting good faith discussion in handicapping that possibility. It sounds crazy, but so did Ukraine, and Xi has done some crazy stuff lately.

I'm saying that articles like this aren't in good faith. More fear = more funding. It doesn't matter what the author believes, they can always find a different author.
Is it a hardware feature that's missing, or software? If the latter, can't it be restored? If the former, or if the latter but it can't be restored, is the docking station where Starliner is berthed going to remain unavailable forever? There are only TWO NASA docking stations. There are a bunch of Russian docking stations.

There's a hard rule for ISS that no astronaut may be on board the ISS without a corresponding return vehicle being docked at all times. This rule is effectively being violated for the two Starliner astronauts because they can't return on Starliner. And now no new Crew Dragons may berth without the current crew returning on the currently berthed Crew Dragon.

What a mess.
It adds a small overhead to transactions. The exact number depends on how much you're inserting and indexing, but is in the milliseconds.

We have adopted strong consistency because we've observed most of our customers run ParadeDB pg_search in a separate instance from their primary Postgres, to tune the instance differently and pick more optimized hardware. The data is sent from the primary Postgres to the ParadeDB instance via logical replication, which is Zero-ETL. In this model, there are no transactions powering the app executed against the ParadeDB instance, only search queries, so this is a non-issue.

We had previously adopted weak consistency because we expected our customers to run pg_search in their primary Postgres database, but observed this is not what they wanted. This is specifically for our mid-market/enterprise customers. We may bring back weak consistency as an optional feature eventually, as it would enable faster ingestion.
> I think strict open source is the best net good for the world we live in.

I agree BUT we've also seen through decades that this model is not working. While there are plenty of notable exceptions, it is difficult to make a living developing code transparently and making it available to the public. We've seen that large companies will build around these tools and pressure developers but not return compensation. We've seen that many of these projects become integral in our infrastructure (though often hidden several layers deep). We've seen that code quality is degraded as things are rushed and the reality is only a few people work on these projects. We've simply learned that we can't really rely on donations and corporations will find it difficult to justify funding even if they highly depend on it (even when it is in their best interest). Because charity is "charity".

The real best thing would be to ensure we have an economy where we compensate people for work that others find beneficial. As in, work is work. If you're developing tools that others are using and monetarily benefiting from, you should be compensated for that work. The world I want to see is where you can make a living as a full time open source dev. And not just for gigantic projects that are easily recognizable as critical, but anything that is critical. Anything that is useful.

I really want to live in that OSS world, but I think we should also have a serious conversation about the issues we face. That we need to question if the incentives align like we think they align. And consider time, as they might have in the past but no longer do. I'll ask a proxy question: Could you research and invent a (Star Trek style) replicator in this environment? Replace with some other device if you will, but such a thing like this would upend many businesses and likely the cannibalize itself. But such a tool would fundamentally change peoples lives for the better, making post scarcity not only possible, but trivial (there are other easier ways to get post scarcity). Fwiw, when I ask the economists[0] they give a two letter answer.

It is undeniable that the way we've done things has been successful. But past performance is no guarantee of future performance. The burden of advancement is that you have to get more nuanced over time. Essentially, we can do well with a low order approximation, but that only goes so far. As you progress, you need to account for more and more higher order terms. So the question is if we've advanced enough where these matter.

[0] I only explain what the device does. Having the ability to assemble things from the atomic level. Like a 3d printer but for atoms. They are smart enough to figure out the rest and I do confirm this. (My partner is an economist, so I pester them about things like this and they do others in reverse. It's good fun)
Sure, but I've also never worked on any software directly responsible for the lives of human beings (as far as I know, anyway). I would like to think I'd operate a little differently if I were.
And not to forget, they traveled up without their personal clothing or handpicked hygiene items. They had to give those up for parts to repair the toilet on the ISS and are using the station's stocked contingency supplies.

https://www.floridatoday.com/story/tech/science/space/2024/0...
Musk stirs UK divisions, sparks calls for faster rollout of online safety laws
Comments like this, where someone who is directly involved and deeply knowledgable, randomly jumps in are why I love HN.

People are so fixated on a result (in this case lowering CO2 emissions) that they can't see past that to consider the actual fundamental legal principles of court decisions, especially supreme court ones. I see this as a failure of our legislative branch, they are incapable of legislating effectively and people look to the courts to achieve their desired ends. Moreover it seems like people don't consider the negative effects if courts decided cases in the other direction (e.g. how federal agencies could abuse their authority if Chevron had been upheld).

I try to read the actual decisions, especially for Supreme Court ones, especially when I superficially disagree with the result and I very rarely end up disagreeing with the decisions. It's bizarre to me how the media only reports on how they disagree with the result (which is a legitimate opinion) and completely fail to discuss, debate or report on the legal theory behind the decision, they commonly seem to not even report on the actual legal question being decided! I have never seen a single mainstream news article which correctly casts blame on congress for failing to legislate effectively or unambiguously.
Why not go all the way and limit the times you have to interact with Python to zero ;)
> Those aren't so much layers as the different parts

Mkay.

> OSCP is how notarization actually works, that's what's being checked to validate the notarization.

No, you are misinformed. OCSP is checked by the trustd process on ocsp2.apple.com, whereas notarization is checked by the syspolicyd process on api.apple-cloudkit.com.

OCSP is simply checking whether the Developer ID certificate has been revoked. Notarization, on the other hand, requires uploading a build to Apple and receiving a special notarization ticket. The notarization ticket is either "stapled" to the app or downloaded from Apple when the app is first launched.
My experience is the total opposite. Smaller companies tend to interview you for and assign you to exactly what they tell you you'll be doing. It's the big publicly traded companies with sprawling administration that seem to consistently do the bait and switch thing.
I suppose it's just the difference between those of us who read history, and those of us who doom scroll social media feeds getting rage baited.
Finally, finally we have a true and worthy successor to “AI” as buzzword. It’s “Agents” ladies and gentlemen.

Make sure to put it into your pitch as often as possible.
You should see the garbage FD-mount stuff I had when I was a starving teenager. Hell, the camera's aperture arm only worked about 30% of the time.

The stuff from then that has survived til today is the survivorship bias.
That snapshots feature looks useful. Right now it's only used for recovery, but if there was a way to write metadata to them (thumbnail for example) an end-user could browse through them.
It is understandably confusing, because the Supreme Court also ruled that it is the case in 2007: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_v._EPA.

> greenhouse gases fit well within the CAA's capacious definition of air pollutant

- United States Supreme Court
Have you ever referenced an offer letter to say no to work you're being assigned?

I feel like the last bullet point is always something like "ad hoc duties as assigned by your manager"
On Firefox, trying the demo viewer "Try it out":

If you click -particularly on a room's label, but also happens when clicking somewhere else-, everything disappears except for the labels. If you click again, everything comes back. Sometimes when click-dragging to rotate, this produces an annoying flash -white for an instant then everything's redrawn.

Also some textures seem to not be loading properly. All furniture remains black.
I don't buy U=U, I've not seen a proper impossibility proof re. provirus mutation. There's probably infections drowned out against the background rate.
Hell no. Why"? Should a anesthetist do he work of a surgeon? It's insane how this industry brainwashed people into becoming jack of all trades, master of none.
> strict open source is the best

RMS gets a lot of flack, but he's pretty good about defining terms like this precisely.

Free software has no restrictions on USE, the restrictions are on redistribution.

Open source is ambiguous can mean all the way from "you can see the source" to being public domain.

Fair source is not free software. They are restricting how it is used.
Their bodies will wither. They will be bathed in radiation. You can only watch Earth go by so many times before it gets mundane.
I did not limit myself to a Chromebook or Lenovo, I went with the tool which best suited the tasks which I was buying it for, best happened to be a Chromebook.
> From my point of view, you are the one being thickheaded here, by clinging to this one idea as if it's the only one you'll ever have.

It's just that you and I haven't yet talked about my idea yet, because you're talking about something else, then failing to realize it and thinking I'm ignoring your rebuttals because I'm stubborn rather than because they're irrelevant to my point.

Anyway I will try one more time for posterity:

> But you can't list its values by your own definition.

You have misunderstood me. The X I have described enumerates its values in the sense I am talking about: it's one or the other, type A (and enum) or B (a predicate). I am talking about it being enumerated _in terms of other things_. If for some reason you had X = A | B, as a definition, and then you the cardinalities of A or B, then you would be able to say |X| = |A| + |B| (or |A| + |B| - |A ∩ B| if they overlap). This is the sense in which algebra works. That is just... obviously true, right?

The interesting parts show up if you have recursive definitions (in which case you get these infinite series) or if some of the sets have cardinalities that you don't know how to use for algebra (like a predicate over an un-enumerable set of values...) ... but in some cases algebra still works, and I don't know the details about that.

In the case of "predicate" types, it is much harder to see how arithmetic would work in the cardinalities, because I could write down something like Prime = x: integer & isPrime(x) and regardless of how you think about |Integer| in your language/setting/etc, you have a complex predicate over integers that's not going to correspond to any obvious algebra. And yet if I wrote Q = Prime | true | false you can still say that |Q| = |P| + 2 and that works fine. On the other hand if I wrote Q = Prime | Fibonacci then good luck because Prime ∩ Fibonacci is hard to do anything with.
> I am looking for like a simple crepe and meatloaf recipe, and end up with some really odd SEO boosted directions.

Pretty sure wanting a "crepe and meatloaf" recipe is the problem there.
I had a hard time trying to understand what my kid is doing there. The “games” were weird. I have an impression that it was very highly addictive. So it’s gone from my home.
Seeking to explain why people steal from these stores is not the same as saying that everyone should be able to.
In landmark Google ruling, a warning to companies about preserving evidence
The article is about LLM agents, so I’m asking in context.

To clarify more, I see frameworks like CrewAI and similar, with tools even from Microsoft to define these “agents” quickly. But when I tried them, I noticed they are no more than chain of thought CoT functions to ask/extract/generate based on user input and functions output.

As such, they can be quite unpredictable, hence my question of examples of LLM agents being used in production. I just don’t see their value, but I might be missing something so wanted to see examples to understand more.