skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Corporate counsel is a seperate thing to a court officer to me, a court officer would be employed by the court.

Ignoring that, there doesn't seem to be any provision for punishing a false DMCA claim.
It has nothing to do with "hard money" if you mean physical currency. People want wealth, period.

The problem with the idea of inflation (read: "scarcity") to drive monetary velocity is it messes with investment. There is no shortage of people wanting to invest capital for increased returns in the future. But if you force consumption without a plan, you're consuming in the present for the sake of it.

A farmer can plant seeds and return an investment on that, or you can eat your seed crop. Forced inflation is forced returns in the present for lower returns in the future. Due to prices functioning as a regression between the exchange of goods and services, this one-to-one mapping is not as obvious, but it is definitively what happens.

You cannot consume what you do not produce. And investment requires deferred consumption. Forced monetary velocity is forced consumption at the expense of investment.
What's the best incentive for you to test out the alpha/beta of a product?
What would make you 100% want to test out the alpha/beta of a product?
I lived in San Francisco in the very late 70s through to the 00s. My first apartment share was $50/mo. The late 70s had the dying embers of the Beat Generation and San Francisco was a sleepy town. San Francisco was great in the 80s with a ton of theater, music, dance, art, everything. It was good in the 90s although the late 90s dotcom boom pushed/priced artists out. The 00s became pretty boring and compressed. I moved to Oakland.

I would say that San Francisco is quite nice now, great bones, although too expensive for interesting people to live.
SF or the bay area? SF itself is kinda not so nice, but when it was south bay/SV, it seems like it could be a lot nicer.
Thanks for the heads up: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buzz_pollination "About 9% of the flowers of the world are primarily pollinated using buzz pollination"

So buzz pollination is very important. Here in the UK I suppose bumble bees do the job. Blue banded bees are native to Australia (according to some frantic searching!)

I'm not sure what to suggest and you will know better than most what happens when you try to tinker with species introduction. Australia is practically a poster child for how not to do it but to be fair very few parts of the world are unscathed from unwise introductions. Here in the UK, Japanese Knotweed, Himalayan Balsam, a shrimp from NZ (can't remember the name) and others are a bit of an issue. We even have feral apples (thanks Romans) - not really, that was a benign introduction, that seems to have been a win/win and cider resulted!

I think we got honeybees from the Roman occupation too but the climate here means that colonies usually need some assistance to survive - wild colonies are rare. The biggest pest for honey bees here is the Varroa mite. Varroa can only live in honey bee colonies, but you let that loose and I doubt it will end well.

I can only suggest trying to find what attracts honey bees and growing that in one place and what works for blue banded bees as far away as possible.

Reading this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amegilla_cingulata - threats. Even Cane toads munch on them!

Its a tough one but you could try getting touch with the nearest uni biology/environmental/conservation or whatever department and see if they have any ideas.

Good luck!
Fair take, but I strongly bet he'll beat these charges. The Veblen stuff is interesting game theory actually. He's explained in detail that it's all strategy; he gave millions to charity but no one paid attention, so he's trying that.

Obviously I'm not guaranteeing anything, but I find his IRL strategies more interesting and compelling than any theory I've seen. Enough to put real, but not significant, money in.
Scientists Find Water Molecules in Lunar Rock Sample for the First Time
I know. I would never remove an "empty" branch full if comments, that's the compiler's job.
It's a user setting; I'm reasonably sure the default is as the previous poster described it, because I remember having to change it when a new account was set up for me last month (could be mistaken, but reasonably sure-ish I'm not).
Yup, another fair point. Such is crypto.
"Slippage" is easy to track but includes everything--loss, employee theft, shoplifting, etc.

"Sales lost to locking up" is a lot harder to track, and nobody has been willing to be forthright about it.

Mostly, this is sleight of hand. None of these companies want to admit that online (even their own!) is eating their lunch.
I agree to a point, but I would separate explicit code from excessive commenting. Explicit code is good because it lets you explain to the reader what you're actually trying to do. Excessive comments (or even comments in general) is less so because compiler cannot check them for correctness, if someone simply forgets to update a comment or writes it incorrectly then the only thing to potentially catch it is a code review.
So, if this does get some where with Jim Jordan also on this, what would be the standard? You have to document that your advertising spend is not based on viewpoint?

As I understand it advertising benefits from Twitter are notoriously hard to quantify in the first place.

I’m narrowly empathetic to the idea that we shouldn’t starve certain view points (though I think that suggesting that there are only two “significant” viewpoints in America cemented in law is a very bad precedent) but these kind of freedoms are also what makes America so good for business.
It's really bad in the default ChatGPT 4o app: I keep posting by mistake my "question" although it's not done yet, so I get non-sensical and slow babbling which I have to interrupt.
The only rational conclusion is that the stories actually do not exaggerate the risk. Many downplay it.
Thanks! Wodehouse is one of those writers who almost never produces a bad sentence. An astonishing talent.
Credits are given on a case by case basis, and being part of an accelerator or being funded by a well known VC helps the application process.
Note in Rust if you include comments with code that will run as tests but be inline in your main code instead of having to find the relevant test function to confirm functionality.

https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustdoc/write-documentation/docume...
I also buy SP500 because I think the number will go up (relative to the depreciating dollar). The goal is to preserve wealth.
I think you either replied to the wrong comment or are maybe confused. Telegraph Hill is quite far from Haight Ashbury (as much as anything can be far apart in a 7x7 mile city).
LLMs will teach you absolute nonsense, and if you're truly a novice you'll never know until it's too late.

If you want to actually learn things (eg. pick up lasting marketable skills), you should read from published professionals and get official credentials. Learning requires putting in the work, shortcuts will compound as you go further along and leave you more confused than your peers. Don't go around mistaking yourself for the self-taught professional if you lean on AI as a crutch.
Cool, have you tried it on a Sinatra app?
Well, that would make sense, wouldn't it?
This is true to a point. But there is the risk of building open source applications that are tied into closed source OS stuff. Like you could build some great thing that is completely dependent on Dirext X for instance. Sure you have ht code but it is functionally useless without that missing piece.

There is also the issue of sheer code size/complexity that means even if you have the code, do you have enough people to verify it or is it a case of just waiting until it breaks/gets exploited? That second point is a larger issue of open source nowadays, not just Microsoft.
Known bug.

The SRR (software readiness review) process happened after development but prior to certification for launch. Most of the bugs were found here and were found to have existed in the code since the beginning of the program.

These were overwhelmingly low severity discrepancy reports.

If I recall correctly, there was a time when they were finding lots of bugs through SRR, so the main development team started their own "continuous review" designed to catch bugs before going to SRR. This made the SRR people angry because they were finding fewer bugs and felt the development team was focusing on competition over bug numbers rather than the code itself.
No, it's a function of low IQ and low impulse control.
AFAIK, there's nothing legally preventing stores from charging more at more-convenient locations. However, in practice I don't normally see it. I believe (not sure) that major convenience store chains, for instance, have fixed prices for the same reason Walmart does: it's too much trouble to track different prices at different locations. As for restaurants and stuff like that, there's usually a lot of competition, so I just don't normally see obviously-higher prices at locations in stations or airports. Of course, some things are obviously more expensive than alternatives: milk at a convenience store is more expensive than almost any grocery store, for instance, though usually not by much. But for whatever reason, I just don't see such obviously and ridiculously jacked-up prices as I see, for instance, in American airports.
Solr and ElasticSearch are both based on Lucene.
Compute is marked up and a lot of those credits are only for AI compute.

Also, those same credit deals are offered to most "serious" startups, including those with backing from any VC.
I’ve never found it to be unpleasant. L stick is usually movement, so it makes sense clicking it would toggle movement (sneak is another good use)

R stick is usually camera, so it makes sense clicking it would toggle vision (or zoom)
It was a common theme in Apple WWDC conferences in the late 80's. Alan Kay has an interesting talk about agents.

I think it could be argued that the low hanging fruit aspect of agents where fulfilled by microservices and web based businesses. The concept of webpages populated with relevant data like google search pages, or Amazon populating products you'd like, could be called agent based. Netflix could be an example of an agent based service.
I hope storage boxes come to Singapore, they're ridiculously affordable for backups. I don't see it happening though, considering the US datacenter still doesn't have them available. I can dream I guess - the ping from AU to EU/US is so high that it takes months to backup to them, but nothing else is affordable unless you're only backing up a few TB.
I agree on the emoji confusion.

ChatGPT suggested [earth] for General, [rock] for Concrete and [thought cloud] for Abstract.
Brother, wait until you hear about Tailscale...

Which is also point to point for the traffic.
By Any Other Name by Jodi Picoult PDF
That's fair, although I don't think they need to review every site on every dmca request, but if the customer replies to the automated request, they should at least take a quick look at that instead of just ignoring it and sending another automated request.

I get that cloudflare, just like every big tech company nowadays, doesn't want to pay for customer service. They want to automate everything and let the code handle the issues. Unfortunately, that general approach is turning our lives into a dystopian hellscape.

In this case, it's a parody site so it's not that big of a deal, but in cases that I'm sure happen regularly that we never hear about, it can be people's livelihoods being destroyed. I think we should expect more from these companies.

It's definitely true though, that if they had to spend on this sort of thing for free accounts, they may just take away the free accounts. That would obviously not be in our interest. I also think that's a very reasonable deal.

I would personally be satisfied if they would make a policy explicit, that for free accounts they will not review the DMCA request, rather they will just forward it and take automated action. For paid accounts though, I expect more.

The biggest thing I think, is to just be transparent and explicit about what their policy and procedure will be and for which account. Having mystery behind it is what bothers me the most and gives me pause when I think about hosting my assets with them.
The hard thing is not scraping, but getting around the increasingly sophisticated blockers.

You'll need to constantly rotate residential proxies (high rated) and make sure not to exhibit data scraping patterns. Some supermarkets don't show the network requests in the network tab, so cannot just get that api response.

Even then, mitm attacks with mobile app (to see the network requests and data) will also get blocked without decent cover ups.

I tried but realised it isn't worth it due to the costs and constant dev work required. In fact, some of the supermarket pricing comparison services just have (cheap labour) people scrape it
Tsung-Dao Lee, 97, Physicist Who Challenged a Law of Nature, Dies
My cofounder was in Europe when I had to put together a reapplication. No problem with doing the video remotely. I just made a screen recording on Zoom.
MNT Pocket Reform first impressions and hardware
Not a comment on the actual product but did you use a specific template or stack on the app you show in the demo?
Question from someone who doesn't know the SF neighborhoods...

Can a single, childless tech startup-type person live comfortably walking car-free in contemporary SF, long-term? If so, how much does that cost, and in what neighborhoods?

Reason I'm asking: the East Coast city where I currently live isn't great for software startups, and, on top of some crazy downsides of this city, there's a possibly emerging new downside: panhandler demographics shifting more towards angry 20yo men who use borderline mugging approaches, very brazenly.

Ideal for me in tech work is what I'll call "mostly-WFH-in-town", where people get most of the WFH flexibility goodness, but can also easily meet up for in-person high-bandwidth focused collaboration, personalizing, working on hardware, etc. So I'd probably want a concentration of potential colleagues who also like mostly-WFH-in-town. So I'm wondering whether SF is that place.

Zillow searches for modern apartments in parts of SF proper look more attractive, for the same money, as places in my city.

But I don't know the SF neighborhoods, and I don't know how representative are the SF stories about stepping over needles on the sidewalk all the time, finding poo on your doorstep every morning, frequent casual break-ins, etc.

Socioeconomic diversity, social justice, and safety nets are great, and preferred. Excessive poo, and other hazards, aren't.

When you walk most places, the sidewalk environment matters even more than if you're usually insulated in either a building or a car.
It tends to succeed in a few situations for me - vacations in backcountry areas, a backup to Hipcamp for campsites and getting a single room. I have found bizarrely it is not cheaper to find a comparable hotel unless the destination is popular.
If you think nginx is the right tool for solving problems like container deployment, service discovery, cluster scaling, and secret management, then I suppose it's not surprising that you think Kubernetes "crashes all the time" and that a 1 year rolling support window for software releases is an insurmountable obstacle. Kubernetes has a lot of genuine issues and rough edges, but you're kind of showing your ass when you make comments like this.
Not wanting to overstate it but are not all deaf languages invented by the deaf? I appreciate the ur-language may not have been, but they have dialects, they are acquired by the language centres of the brain, all languages are owned by the speakers and adjust to language change as a function of speakers changing how language is parsed.

Isn't this just normal Chomsky grammer LAD stuff?
This would be great in the extension format:

highlights-text --> Right-Click --> New ML --> (smart dropdown for watch [price|name|date|{typed-in-prompt-instructions}] --> TAB --> (smart frequency - tabbing through {watch blah (and its auto-filling every N ) --> NAME_ML=ML01.

THEN:

highlights-text --> Right-Click .... WHEN {ML01} == N DO {this|ML0X} --> ML00

ML00 == EMAIL|CSV|GDrive results.

ML11 == Graph all the above outputs.

:-)

--

A MasterLoop would be good - where you have all [public or private] loops register - and then you can route logic based on loops that exist - and since its promptable - it can summarize and suggest logic when weaving loops into cohesive lattices of behavior. And if loops can subscribe to the output of other loops -- when youre looking for certain output strands -- you can say:

Find all the MLB loops daily and summarize what they say about only the Dodgers and the Giants - and keep a running table for the pitchers, and catchers stats only.

EDIT: Aside from just subscribing, maybe a loop can #include# the loop in its behavior to accomplish its goal/assimilate its function / mate/spawn. :-)

These loops are pretty Magic!
Why? Is there supposed to be any problem in riding suitcases besides the very fact this formally breaks a law? Shouldn't they better just update the law to add an exception?
https://archive.ph/7Gtuz
I (well really, a coworker of mine) just today discovered a JetBrains action “Copy GitHub URL” [sic] that, if you have lines of code selected in the IDE, includes those lines in the copied URL fragment. So so so much better than my old workflow of stopping what I’m doing, going to the file in GitHub, and selecting the lines there to share links to bits of code.
> Crime is a function of inequality

I think the prevailing attitude is more like, "Yes, crime is a function of inequality, but it's also a function of X, Y, Z other things, and leaving them out does more harm than good to the discourse."
Having Elon Musk as a boss is a tough gig – just ask X's Linda Yaccarino
As I skimmed that, the text wrapped at the hyphen in man-hours, and my brain autocompleted it to "295x fewer managers" - and it pretty much rings true...
No license, GPL or otherwise, can prevent the situation you describe. If the project is licensed under the GPL, and the company decides it's not turning sufficient profit while remaining open source, then they'll simply stop working on the project and the outcome is the same.

Any open source project can only thrive if the community puts the effort in. Choosing GPL does not prevent or even lessen the risk that a company will decide to stop putting forth the effort.
And you couldn't use OCR and simply take an image of the product list? Not ideal, but difficult or impossible to track depending on your method.
> That sounds so unlike the YC partners

I appreciate the insider perspective; my faith in YC was exactly why I was so dumbfounded. Me and my cofounder spent quite a bit of time speculating, and wrote a substantial, thoughtful response. Ignored and rejected.

I wanna make clear again that I’m not bitter about this, it was just odd. And counterproductive.
I'm guessing the bottleneck lies in surface area to effectively collect samples rather than the effort to inspect samples and processing them to determine origin. The roof is going to have contaminants, sure, but so is any other collection area. Using a magnet to get iron based particulate then picking out rocks with unique elements is likely a lot cheaper than a purpose built facility to collect micrometeoroid samples with reduced contamination
Some employees quitting in a 1500 people company? Impossible. Any departure must be interpreted as the doom of openai, there's no other possibility.
It's still in technical preview.
So.. "Brodies Notes" or "Lambs tails from Shakspear"

if you want digested knowledge, I'm not sure an LLM is the best path into a digestion of knowledge but I am also unsure digested knowledge is deep learning. So your competitive "know more facts" approach sounds to me like classic autodidact model: Learn facts, assume your inferences over those facts is "knowledge"

I cannot count (there are too many) the number of times my own autodidact instinct was .. completely wrong.
In rural areas, which is where it seems like Clarkson's farm is located, there are no inspectors. They just don't exist.

I expect building codes and nonsense like that in cities. But not in farms.
Thanks for sharing. Curious to see if Xbox and PS5 controllers use the same analog stick hardware.

The issue with L3 as Sprint is that a button is so much easier to press and hold than a joystick (as mentioned in the article). Even worse is when games use L3 as Sprint but also configure the analog stick to perform some other action, in which case you can perform actions you don't mean to perform.
It’s not a weasel word, because I don’t think what they were trying to say was unclear.

Maybe you’re some angel who has never wanted to do anything wrong for a single moment in your life, power to you if you are, but I think you are in the vast, vast minority.

Most people have considered doing a bad thing at least once and probably considerably more than that. I don’t think they’re bad for thinking it. I feel like that’s what the writer was trying to say.
Most games should just have faster movement speed and do away with sprinting.
How did you acquire an ASN, how much did it cost you, and how much ongoing maintenance/cost is it?
My favorite door to door sales pitch is "buy a subscription to one of these magazines or I'll have to go back to doing drugs." I've had at least 3 of those salesmen.
> So, as games get larger and more complex -- say, with rules and payoffs that evolve over time -- finding equilibria can become... intractable

Yeah: when the optimal solution for everybody involves picking decisions at random times, trying to find a closed formula can very quickly degenerate into madness even for very simple problems (where, say, the correct solution would happen to be, for each player "go left x% of the time, go right y% of the time, do nothing z% of the time"). Just Monte-Carlo the thing and find the Nash equilibrium that way.
I mean, if you're doing binary searches, the first thing to do is to switch to Eytzinger searches (at least for the prefixes; it's unclear if Eytzing-sorting large strings matters) which are much more cache friendly. (incidentally, Eytzinger was Austrian, not German - same language though!)

Second, I'd probably switch to struct-of-array instead of array-of-struct, since the search part only needs the (head of the) key. Possibly some trie-like logic would also help (that is, avoid duplicating the common prefix, instead point to an array of continuations rather than a single one), but beware of costly indirections.

Third, I would make sure the user is able to specify the SSO limit, since different domains will have different requirements.

Fourth ... if you're column-oriented (or for simple data in the first place), consider implicit union of different `Set` (or whatever) implementations. For example, store all short strings in one array, and all long strings in a different array.
https://archive.md/EC5EG
Why? What's in it for MS? The only people who will notice are people running ad-blockers, and the intersection of those people and people who willingly use Edge is quite small I think. And ad-blockers still work with MV3, just not as well, so this really only appeals to hard-core ad-blocking people who insist on having the full capabilities of uBO and not uBO Lite. People like that are more likely to just use Firefox, rather than migrating from Chrome (by Google) to Edge (by Microsoft).

What you're proposing just sounds like a lot of extra work for MS, without any measurable gain. Sure, it'd be nice, in the broader interest of reducing Chrome's dominance and promoting browser diversity, but I don't see how there's any incentive for MS to do it.