skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's certainly how it should work, but how it should be and how it is are not the same thing. There's a reason we're fighting for Right to Repair laws.
Some parts will be preserved. Some countries have legal deposit not only for printed materials but also the internet.

https://www.kb.dk/en/find-materials/collections/netarkivet
https://youtu.be/KUHdTDwdq8U

https://www.foodwastemovie.com/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3597400/
A college girlfriend (Washington State University., class of '78) was in chemical engineering and had to take a semester of programming (back then Comp. Sci. was a subdivision of the math department). I spent many an evening with her, helping her punch cards and waiting for output. I managed to steal a few cards to use for bookmarks and still find them around here and there.
I’ve used Protonmail for years, but lately the encryption is making me seriously consider a switch. You can’t use 3rd party email clients, unless you also install Proton Mail Bridge, which is only available for paid users. And the bridge only works for desktop, so you won’t be able to use 3rd party email clients on your phone.

This is an issue not only with Proton Mail, but with other services in their ecosystem too. For example, you also can’t integrate Proton Calendar with the iOS Calendar app, because of the encryption.

And all of this is for no benefit, because your email won’t be fully E2E encrypted unless your recipient is also using Proton Mail. Most of your recipients will be using Gmail or Outlook, so at the end of the day Google/Microsoft will read your emails anyway.

I’m considering switching to Fastmail, Mailbox.org, or Migadu. If you need to send truly private emails, use PGP encryption.
No. PE (price to earnings ratio) is the ratio of price to profit. Assuming they do not grow, their profit is stable at the latest reported value indefinitely, and that their accounted profit is a good approximation of distributable cash (that is the approximate goal of how profit is to be accounted), then the inverse of the PE is the maximum return on investment at this instant. That is all of their earnings paid out as returns.

Apple has a PE of ~34, so that is ~3%. 30 year treasury bonds are averaging ~4% right now. So yeah, Apple would be a abysmal long term investment if you assume they do not continue to grow. Anything with a PE over 25 at this time must grow to be worth the investment.
Not to pick on you but this general type of response to these AI threads seems to be coalescing around something that looks like a common cause. The thing that tips your comment into that bucket is the "serious tasks" phrasing. Trying to use current LLMs for either extremely complex work involving many interdependent parts or for very specialized domains where you're likely contributing something unique or to any other form of "serious task" you can think of generally doesn't work out. If all you do all day long are serious tasks like that then congrats you've found yourself a fulfilling and interesting role in life. Unfortunately, the majority of other people have to spend 80 to 90 percent of their day dealing with mind numbing procedural work like generating reports no one reads and figuring out problems that end up being user error. Fortunately, lots of this boring common work has been solved six ways from Sunday and so we can lean on these LLMs to bootstrap our n+1th solution that works in our org with our tech stack and uses our manager's favourite document format/reporting tool. That's where the other use cases mentioned in the article come in, well that and side projects or learning X in Y minutes.
https://archive.md/XeNGe
"in the video above"

What video are you referring to? This post is just taking me back to this same page, I'm not seeing any video link. Maybe I'm missing something.

Getting Steve Jobs personal acknowledgement must have been pretty amazing. That's a good sign you paid attention to detail. I do think I can recall the visual customization done for specific artists and tracks, was very cool. Style matters alot for the vibe in music games, the attention to it is one of the reasons I always preferred Rock Band to Guitar Hero.

Thanks for the cool game! I was actually at uni for game development at the time and as one of my major projects I made a design document for a DJ music game. The Tap Tap Revenge series was definitely an inspiration and contributor to my love of music games at the time and I had alot of fun playing it. May have been one of the first few apps I ever spent money on.

It's making me nostalgic for the time when my smartphone was a new, cool, and fun device and not the addictive attention span sucking portal to hell it is now.
Two follow-ups for you:
1. Is this response some kind of attempt to excuse hostile UX?
2. Because reader mode exists, does that mean brutally bad UX should never be called out?
I know I’m a nobody, but between the Dwi and……acquiring MySpace, I don’t think highly of Justin Timberlake lol.
I am the furthest thing from an introvert imaginable. I've just spent my weekend surrounded by about 40 of my friends at a festival, and if it were up to me I'd be there for another week minimum.

I'd rather be locked up in a padded room alone than suffer through the office.

Coworkers are not my friends, and the fake socialization I'm forced to put up with there is exhausting, because I just don't care about them. I have actual friends whom I see a lot more often these days thanks to WFH, and nothing on this planet is going to convince me rotting away in an open air office is better than the alternative.
That's what I hoped this would be!
Chilli/chillies in the Britain, but chilly/chillies is certainly a more typical looking pair, logic's on your side!
RTSPtoWeb (https://github.com/deepch/RTSPtoWeb) is a similar application for re-encapsulating video packets from RTSP to WebRTC, also written in Go.
Oh I think you might have an error in your submission. I don't think it's correctly linking to the youtube video, but I've just found it searching on youtube.
> Yep. They also did partial reconstuction work of the great wall in modern times and passed it off as ancient.

Do you have a source for "and passed it off as ancient"?
How do you plan to enforce that ban?

Eh, RealPage was pretty obvious from day 1. The CEO literally has a ban on him doing the same thing for Airlines.
I think in the long term there is no real solution to making the planet and humans coexist in a sustainable manner. Yes, as Covid showed, stark decrease in human activity is very good for the planet. But it is not a long term solution, a depression wouldn’t be either.

I hope I’m wrong but if not, we are on the path for shooting ourselves into oblivion in not so long. Planet will need a couple million years to recover, but I have good hope it will.
That would indeed be much simpler! I'm skeptical that the browser is powerful enough to handle a usable frame rate since every frame would have to go from the network -> DOM -> browser app memory -> frame buffer. The browser can barely keep up with the Kindle store / Goodreads, but it'd be nice to be proven otherwise since it'd make it much easier to get this working ootb on brand new Kindles.
Any hints on why you’re adding so many newlines into your comment?
This is just for you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWMsWXUljIg
Roughly where in the world do you live that garages don't have power?
Immigration probably makes housing more affordable, as building still a labour intensive activity, and immigration reduces labour costs. We have car assembling robots, but not house building robots, or plumber robots.

But we can't count on migration on the long term anyway, as countries with current net positive population growth rates are on the way to go sub-replacement in 1-2 generations as well.

Housing unaffordability should be pinned on NIMBY, bias against high density housing, and the decades long push to optimize housing as a rent-seeking friendly investment vehicle instead of simple dwellings. Today if you intend to buy an apartment in a high cost city, odds are that you must not only outbid people wanting to live there as well, but also rich people overseas that invest in real state as a way to stash money offshore and/or evade taxes.
enum class Handle : uint32_t { Invalid = 0 };
// process({10}); // error
process(Handle{10});

> In C++14, you could use process(static_cast<Handle>(10)); so, as you can see, the C++17 version is much better.

100% disagree that the c++17 version is better. It just lets you right broken code that doesn't look broken.
> Letting companies pay people too little is subsidizing those inefficient unproductive companies.

That's a direct subsidy to people assuming that too little subsidy is supplemented with welfare or food stamps. It may also be an indirect second-order subsidy to a company, but it is first and foremost a subsidy to people.
I'd be less perplexed if I heard comments like yours from people: It's enough for me. But I've not encountered many (any?) other regular 120v charger users.
Greeted with a sword picture (ascii), glorifying Sparta (what is this "Established 650 BC"?), not utf-8 but only "us-ascii". This doesn't smell good vibes to me.

Sorry but pass.
The better bet would be to use green tomatillos instead of peppers as the main flavor.
RFCs sometimes have pseudocode. It would be nice to have a "pseudocode translator" that translates it to some actual programming language.

With few exceptions, I have gven up on documentation. Whether it is specifications or software. Now I just read source code instead.

I think in the 60s and 70s documentation used to be better and did focus more on input/output. For example, I still use spitbol and icon.

Maybe it is controversial view, but I fail to comprehend how any RFC can be considered a "specification". In truth an RFC is only a "proposed specification" at best, literally a "request for comments". (Where are the comments?) In fact, often RFCs simply document some internet practice that already exists. (Meanwhile the number of "BCPs" is relatively small.) RFCs can be anything.
People working from home also go out (or order in) for lunch
anyone else just seeing... json?
I am being silenced for speaking the truth!

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/12728e144994efe8...

https://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#c11-gene...
Why does it seem like you’re always hiring? Is there lots of growth happening or is it turnover?
Is that the reason for two different type annotation signifiers? That some day I might want to extend the language with something?

It sounds a bit like if every C function (including hello world) had to have empty asm block because someone might need it some day.
Life extension in humans is difficult because we are already long lived for a high metabolism large mammal. That means evolution has probably already tweaked the obvious knobs.

It doesn’t mean it can’t be done, just that it is not likely to be as easy as pushing a few chemical buttons or turning something on or off.
Pushing for diplomacy and peace for better economy is heresy now as it always was. It's your forum so I will stop commenting. Peace out
And you might have less degradation if you had L2 charged it primarily.
It seems like they didn't do a comprehensive risk analysis. So why must the employees who had no say in the matter directly pay for the incompetence?
You have to look at it as a contractor. If you tell a contractor to "build me X" then you might get anything back with a high probability of getting something common but outdated. You have to write a specification for it with all of the constraints and preferences you have. Works well if you know the domain, if you're using it for something you don't know much about then you have to do more of the legwork yourself but at least it will give you a starting point that can inform your research.
> I don't expect it to work. Just like I don't expect my own code to ever work.

This line really struck me and is an excellent way to frame this issue.
Botulism is nearly a non-issue full stop, but American food writing always needs FDA recommendations and general fearmongering, for some reason.

15 episodes (62 patient cases) in the UK between 1922 and 2005. https://academic.oup.com/jpubhealth/article/28/4/337/1622732... Mostly not home-prepared, and of those that were only one was canned vegetables (mushrooms).

It's nasty and can be fatal yes, but in terms of risks in life it just doesn't warrant mentioning, and yet it is so often. (And I do not believe it's bloggers feeling the need to warn about it that's suppressing the numbers!) You're probably more likely to get run over on your way to the shop for whatever you want to can/ferment.
I dropped out of school ambitions to be an architect, because I said there is only room for one Frank Lloyd/Gehry... I wont be working at that level...

Went into computers instead - fell back on architecture+tech...

Worked on big project and had to fly to a meeting in LA to meet with the Architect... Frank Gehry.

(I used to be on the same pee schedule as Andy Grove (we never spoke))
> The Internet is full of these micro-tyrants and I never see anyone complaining about them.

I'll complain about them. They're, at best, poorly-informed people who don't understand the ramifications of what they're doing as it winds up as abuse, or worst they're malicious actors who I hope are condemned to a life of a 300 baud modem over a rural telephone line in a lightning storm.

The hiccup is, these are two different problems. I'm not the service administrator; I'm the user who has to put up with the absolutely onerous "bot prevention service." Frankly, if you're a private entity, I'm mostly of the mind of do what you like. If I encounter a CAPTCHA, I will probably just bounce off the page. Except, of course, that Google penalizes me for doing that, too, because I Might Be A Bot That Got Stymied(tm).

Where my hackles are truly raised is when the government requires me to work through these moronic puzzles. I shouldn't have to do a CAPTCHA to log in to my transit pass or look up county records!

Finally, it's everyone who will handwave away "well, it's inaccessible but whachagondo" without the acknowledgement that we are all on varying levels of "abled" and that level changes throughout our lives, and not just as it relates to age.
I would say that allowing undefined behavior is a bug in itself. It was an understandable mistake for 1970, especially for such a hacker language as C. But now if a compiler can detect UD, it should warn you about it (and mostly it does by default), and you should treat that warning as an error.

So, well, yes, if the bug is due to triggering UD, some blame should fall on the developer, too.
Wow, you weren't joking:

> apic_c1e spectre_v1 spectre_v2 spec_store_bypass swapgs taa itlb_multihit srbds mmio_stale_data retbleed eibrs_pbrsb gds bhi
Most EVs now can charge at over 100 kW peak, and that means most EVs will be able to in five years. I don’t see how it’s that big of a deal to allow people with older, used EVs to charge at all stations. Even charging companies have this stance.
This should be the main video, maybe there's an error! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XmWPATbkeM
Which part of that is a pun?
> No, it means that the bug is documented to be in the platform, not the program.

Yes, it means that the platform is buggy, but that doesn't help anyone wanting to write portable-in-practice code. The standard specifying specific behavior is just giving a false sense of security.

> Okay, how about `signal()` being called in a multi-threaded program? Why couldn't they define it in C11 such that it could be called?

This is even more definitely not a case of compiler developer conflict of interest. And it's not a case of previously-defined behavior changing, so that set remains still at just realloc. (I wouldn't be surprised if there are more, but if it's not a thing easily listed off I find it hard to believe it's a real significant worry)

But POSIX defines it anyway; and as signals are rather pointless without platform-specific assumptions, it's not like it matters for portability. Honestly, having signals as-is in the C standard feels rather useless to me in general. And 'man 2 signal' warns to not use 'signal()', recommending the non-standard sigaction instead.

And, as far as I can tell, implementation-defined vs undefined barely matters, given that a platform may choose to define the implementation-defined thing as doing arbitrary things anyway, or, conversely, indeed document specific behavior for undefined things. The most significant thing I can tell from the wording is that implementation-defined requires the behavior to be documented, but I am fairly sure there are many C compilers that don't document everything implementation-defined.

> I'd rather not be forced to be a superhuman programmer.

All you have to do is not use signed integers for doing modular/bitwise arithmetic just as much as you don't use integers for doing floating-point arithmetic. It's not much to ask. And the null pointer thing isn't even an issue for userspace code (i.e. what 99.99% of programmers write).

I do think think configuring behavior of various things should be more prevalent & nicer to do; even in cases where a language/platform does define specific behavior, it may nevertheless be undesired (e.g. a+1<a might not work for overflow checking if signed addition was implementation-defined (and, say, a platform defines it as saturating), and so portable projects still couldn't use it for such).
Congratulations and well done!!!

> However, I'm feeling burnt out and ready to call it finished, even though it may not feel completely done. Avoiding another abandoned side project has been my primary motivation in reaching this point.

Thank you for spending your time to produce this excellent resource and releasing it to us. Don’t feel too bad about it not being all the way where you’d like it to be. You can always improve it later, or even allow the community to help you improve it.
The main difference between old ("unscoped") and new ("scoped") enums, besides dropping implicit conversions from/to integral types, is the scope of the named constants. With unscoped enums, the constants are in the surrounding scope, which means that constants with the same name but of different enum types collide with each other. One solution is to wrap them in a dummy struct or class (`struct Foo { enum Bar { baz = 0 } }` => `Foo::baz`). Scoped enums are more or less a shortcut for that, where with `enum class Foo { bar }` you have to write `Foo::bar`, or you can use `using enum Foo` to be able to write plain `bar` again.

The reason other values of the underlying integral type beyond the named ones are allowed, is that enums are often used to specify bit values or bit masks that you AND/OR with each other. It is what it is.

The other question is, how would you go about converting an integral value to an enum type if only specific values were allowed? Either you need an explicit case distinction (potentially large switch) for all the allowed values, or there would have to be a hidden structure/array specifying the valid values at runtime, generated by the compiler. C++ is rather conservative in adding such runtime structures.
Everyone here points to the high P/E ratio as the reason to sell. That is simply the reason to sell NOW. The reason it's being sold is he is obviously less bullish on the company. It doesn't take much to understand why. The thing that led to Apple's growth as a company and a stock is something called the iPhone. The thing that drove sales of the iPhone was the fact they were not just getting better, they were getting _different_. More cameras. Different kinds of sensors. Now they are just getting better. And less better each generation. Benedict Evans would call this the top of the "S" curve. It matters when selling someone a new phone in a new box is the main thing that generates your profits.

You can be a great company with great leadership and great products. You can't defy the laws of the "S" curve and market saturation. It doesn't matter how good you are. This is why Buffett and Co. are unloading. I wouldn't be surprised if it all gets sold by the end of the year.

EDIT: I called this sale two weeks ago in a tweet:

https://x.com/jkingyens/status/1813214574436303114
Hopefully that means we’ve got 20 years left of employment.
this is really intriguing to me...do you not have browser history? i could tell you each and every single webpage ive been to in the last years
It’s not just Croatia. Local food is fresh from the sun and ground. Go to your farmers’ market. Meet your farmer. Sign up for a farm box and get it every week.
You’ll eat better, live healthier, connect with your community. Oh and it’s cheaper and your money goes directly to the people who deserve it.
https://archive.is/NbtsE
I second that. I've only had a chance to buy one PC from them (I usually run Macs), but the level of attention to detail and customer service from Puget was bar none the best I've had from any tech outfit.
That’s no surprise. If I were not very good after 30 years of experience I’d also hope to not be judged by that.
The Making of Tap Tap Dance video, it apparently didn't attach. Here it is! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XmWPATbkeM

I guess I should probably resubmit.
how naive are you?

you have no proof besides what scaremongerers tell you

why would anyone risk commiting a crime for voting? there's no personal gain for voting.
HaxiTAG-Assistant: Empowering Your Business with Cutting-Edge AI
HaxiTAG-Assistant is an open source AI assistant project designed to help enterprises use the latest generative AI (GenAI) and large language model (LLM) technologies to improve business efficiency and innovation capabilities. Developed by the HaxiTAG team, the project provides a series of powerful and easy-to-use tools that support multilingual generation, document processing, customer support and other application scenarios.
The Razr is about the same width as my s22+. That wouldn't bother me, I like how it's half the vertical size of any other typical phone.
On the other hand, the Chandrasekhar limit is somewhat more well known.
I don't think the Soviets were naive enough about orbital mechanics to believe that a Space Shuttle could "loiter" in orbit ready to drop nuclear payloads. That's just not how it works. A Shuttle in an inclined orbit would only occasionally pass over primary targets. And a weapon can't just be dropped. It requires a de-orbit burn and guidance system. It wouldn't necessarily hit any faster than existing SLBMs.

From a military perspective there was at one point a plan to use the Shuttle for overhead imagery with film cameras. Launch from California into a polar orbit, make a single photo reconnaissance pass over the USSR, and land immediately back at the launch site for film processing. But advances in spy satellites eliminated the need for that mission.
Well, they seem to have managed to introduce the poison to the nearby beach, which probably was actually unintended.
Interesting. However, I am not a developer but I do have more than 5K stars, it might be a good idea to look into that stars that a user has.
Proton more for their growing ecosystem of tools
Not a Croatian, but I visit the Zadar / Ugljan area every couple of years. Last time a Bosnian friend visited from Banja Luka and she brought some tomatoes with her. They were phenomenal <3
Did you try very hard? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5rXAp8My7Js
It’s basically an impossible situation. I sympathize with TAs that have to read through dozens of AI generated slop papers and want to put an end to it. But the fallout from a false accusation is serious and potentially life-changing. Schools don’t have to give you due process.

That’s why I was so upset about tools like “gpt zero” and the media’s subsequent fawning over it. They don’t care how accurate they are. They’ll add some fine print weasel words about how they only provide guidance but they know what they’re doing.