skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
From my experience, Google works but service are badly finished at the edge. It is lien them being constantly in Beta, having users as beta testers. But works well enough for the most common cases.

Azure is the worst. No one in his sane mind would have a reason to go there. Seriously. Things does not work regularly without a good reason. Randomly. Even their own administration portal randomly crash, randomly fail to apply changes, consume a lot of memory in your browser. Have stupid rough edge everywhere. Like it is cloud but still you can't "migrate" a webapp install to another plan or region. Just impossible. You have to manually copy it. And by manually I mean that it is not even good at exporting a complete config like yaml or json to reload it somewhere else.

Azure as so much business just because they give free credits or pay consulting for customers to switch, and also have managed to have big corporation to sign contracts with them. The one that use office 365.

And when you are a dev or manager in such a big corp, it is easy to request a subscription with the corp account that requesting the company to contract with AWS.
So you go with the flow to get the job done.

AWS is the nice in between between the 2. They have services that are rarely upgraded with better features but have a lot of services that just work correctly mostly. And administrating your account through the interface or code logic is basically guaranteed to work.
> Now, I decide to hire a local contractor I know to help me integrate the self hosted version. They don't touch the code or do anything with it, they just work on integrating it into my existing business stack.

We even specifically call out that case in the license as a permitted purpose:

> Permitted Purposes specifically include using the Software: [...] in connection with professional services that you provide to a licensee using the Software in accordance with these Terms and Conditions.

And yes, Fair Source has limitations over Open Source and by design. We figured the best way to balance this out is to transition it into a full and unquestionable Open Source via a springing license.
Technology Connections did a whole video on the pros & cons of longer-lasting incandescents.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zb7Bs98KmnY
I'm a big fan of C#, but to be fair nothing else you've named is really aiming for the same niche. The better comparison would be Swift, Go, Java/Kotlin, stuff like that.

But yeah I think C# is often unfairly viewed as a boring enterprise-y language when it's actually become a very comfy swiss army knife.
Also, the homomorphic encryption is a requirement for third-party caller ID providers, not Apple themselves. Apple's first-party "Contact Photos" caller ID feature operates primarily on the "trust Apple" security model AFAIK.
On Food
Threaten legal action if scraping continues or something similar as the scraping ends abruptly for every site but the prices still sit online at the supermarkets site.
Do you have a version of this, but with positive data? For example, spots with great weather, or where acts of kindness frequently happen, or lots of photos get taken (so excellent views). Might be fun!
These three observations from the OP are consistent with my own:

* Many people who spend well below their means experienced financial precariousness earlier in life.

* They may no longer be poor, but the stress of deprivation is never far from their memory.

* Concerns about spending are a preemptive response to make sure they never find themselves overspending.
The problem is that the sin and cos functions the proof relies on are embroiled with pi. It's not obvious whether or not that is a confounding issue or not.
> Isn't the storage kinda expensive?

Depends on the actual performance. Normal EBS is dead slow but you can pay for the IoPs.
Since Marbury vs Madison was so early on it would be hard to really figure out if it has been a net positive. We can make some assumptions about what would have happened, but I don't think it would really be practical to come to any conclusion.
This already exists and is what casting was originally based off. DIAL.
In Tony Hawk’s defence, he’s a pro skater, not a security analyst. Limited time behind the keyboard in the late 90s/early 2000s grinding on his soon-to-be iconic game series would have been spent making sure 900 McTwists felt really natural, not auditing code for buffer overruns!
Breaking ToS is 100%, but that wouldn't stop people scraping, in all cases the people scraping are receiving something that stops them scraping while the data still is available, continuing the "why doesnt someone do this" project.
Weird I was wondering what the heck happened to this guy. He just fell off the radar.
I don't really see the homosexuality part as absurd. It is to be expected in their less tolerant culture. Remember, Turkey is the only majority Muslim country in the world where homosexuality is legal. They're pretty tolerant comparatively, but their culture is such that they don't want to encourage it. I wouldn't want to live in their society but I do believe in national self determination.
Successful cold callers research their customers beforehand to know what they want, and don't call people who probably aren't interested.

If you're a game collector and I show up with a rare game, you're probably interested. Even if you don't buy it, at least I'm not wasting your time. If I show up with an Ethernet switch ASIC, you're probably not interested and I am wasting your time. That's why Marvell would cold-call Juniper and Cisco, not Antonio Romero Monteiro.
Network-centric vs. Application-centric Approach
I've seen comments like this a few times, and I think there's a misunderstanding at play. I think people who are used to using REPLs look at people who aren't and conclude that, since they don't have a REPL in their toolbox, they don't have a tool in there that does what a REPL does. But I think most of the time, they are accomplishing the same tasks with a different workflow.

For instance, I use throwaway files instead of REPLs, even when I have access to one. I'm still running small and isolated experiments to build my understanding, but I get to use the editor I'm comfortable with and it's easy to copy the code into my project afterwards.

The other thing I used to use REPLs for was introspection/looking up documentation, which my LSP handles nicely. You can think of the LSP as a sort of REPL integrated seamlessly into the editor; when I have a question, I'll query the LSP by writing a line of dummy code that causes the LSP to generate an annotation with the answer. So for instance if I want to know if `foo` implements a certain trait/interface, I can write a variable declaration like `let x: Box<dyn MyTrait> = Box::new(foo)` and see if my LSP annotated that as a type error. I can do this very quickly and without leaving my editor, so it helps me stay in the flow of things.
I'm originally from Shetland, but moved to the Scottish Borders when I was young, and do remember people had a very hard time understanding my Shetland dialect (which I had to lose pretty quickly to communicate locally).

And to the original point, neither Shetland nor the Scottish Borders have ever had any Gaelic influence at any point in their history, and recent attempts to claim otherwise tend not to go down too well with the locals.
regex isn't probably a good thing in a kernel boot code considering it's NP hard
SARS was caused by a coronavirus.
Terraforming Mars may be easier than scientists thought
If anything, the extra couple people on board is a great help for stationkeeping and workload division to help give everyone a break.
Meta is closing a beloved first-party Quest studio
> is it not that the actual security of notarization is provided by OSCP?

The security of notarization is provided by Apple's signature over the hashes of the executables in the app [0]. The hashes and signature are put into a "ticket". This ticket is stored on Apple's servers, and can also be "stapled" to the app. Gatekeeper (one of the macOS security systems) will prefer to fetch the ticket from Apple if possible, and fall back to the stapled ticket if available. Notarization is meant to guarantee that the code was sent to Apple and checked for malicious code.

OCSP checks that the Apple Developer ID certificate used to sign the app hasn't been revoked.

They are two separate checks done by the Gatekeeper system, which is meant to ensure that only trusted software runs on macOS. I believe it makes sense to call the OCSP check part of the Gatekeeper system, but this may be incorrect.

[0]: https://forums.developer.apple.com/forums/thread/710738
Good suggestion, thanks.

ChatGPT came up with what I thought was a halucination: "CPU Sim".

After some searching, I found a Facebook post[1] with a photo of it running. That looks mostly like what I recall. The screenshot is from a 1987 version.

I can also find references to a Windows version, but no copies of either. I thought there were more features to it, but perhaps I'm misremembering or I've also thinking of Mikrosim that Tomte mentions in the sibling comment.

[1] https://www.facebook.com/RMUserGroup/posts/pfbid0uVrCYMsWmJa...
Everyone should absolutely do a small garden in their yard instead of grass or other wasteful landscaping.

As a farmer, this looks like it would be massively expensive per acre and massively wasteful of environmental resources. I currently farm 5,000 acres including 400 irrigated acres for $300,000 per year. I grow enough food to feed thousands of people a year.

You would need 200 of these systems to farm one acre. I could not find a list price on the website, but based on my knowledge of CNC machine pricing, each machine probably costs in the neighborhood of $10,000. So this machine would cost $2,000,000 per acre to farm. Insanity.

Government bureaucrats want you to starve to death, so I am sure money will go to this and be taken from ordinary farmers.

The system also appears to be an environmental disaster... Enormous amounts of heavily machined aluminum, stainless steel, and plastic to do tiny bits of work already done far more efficiently in other ways.
they did not . anthropic often sends broken json
Airbus Alabama laughs off in the distance.
> so that they never see a warning

Untrue. You always see a warning: https://lapcatsoftware.com/articles/unsigned.html
They might help a lot, but they also take a lot of equity. Let's say you alone might get the company to a 10 million valuation, if you're good. Well, the VCs will help you get it to 100 million, but they'll take 95%.
Low taxes on gasoline. Approval of oil pipeline through Minnesota. Support for factory-farmed meat industry. Allowing agricultural pollution. Increased government spending on car-dependent infrastructure.
> The Scrum Master is supposed to be the unblocker and master of ceremonies.

How about we throw the ceremonies AND the scrum master (and scrum along with it) out of the window and treat the developers like grown ups that can actually unblock themselves? How about we treat all the devs, all the time, like people who know how to say they are stuck, need help, or how to say NO? Why need to infantilize them?

> The Scrum Master needs to be involved with the actual work to understand what a blocker is

Wow, that means...literally every dev can be a scrum master. So, should the devs that are currently not the Scrum master suddenly lose their unblocking capability and sit around hopelessly while Scrum hero solves the bottleneck for them?

> The ideal PO is the keeper of the vision and the tastemaker and a buffer between the team and the business/politics and the subject matter expert when it comes to business requirements for the project.

Oh, poor devs, needing a buffer, and somebody to tell them what the Business (capital letter, like the Church, cause it's an institution) wants. It's not like they can go and ask, god forbid a developer talks to a Business person directly. The outrage!

> The author's complaints about Scrum Master and Product Owner do not seem to be substantiated, just gripes.

The author has a very substantiated gripes with both roles, as both the author and me (and many others) view these roles as useless management cruft.

And the PO has to also be a subject matter expert, wow! They must have studied hard in the Subject Matter school (1 week online course) to acquire such skills!

Wanna hear about my revolutionary idea? A development team consisting of...developers.
Isn’t simplest rule of thumb to just ask the person whose name it is?
Unironically this.

Having "interfaces" and "abstract classes" is just a kludge, multiple inheritance covers all of this with one language construct.

The "diamond problem" is a C++ issue, every other language solved it.
It's got so many fluorines running around that intuitively as an amateur chemist I would expect it to have an extraordinarily long half life in the human body, especially so if it's administered as a depot injection in something with a large molecular weight. It takes your body a long time to chew through the inactive components in a depot injection.
Social comparisons shape our subjective satisfaction
> organizations that behave like this tend to be dysfunctional

Disagreed. The only thing this means is that their recruiting process is dysfunctional. That doesn’t mean that it would automatically lead to poor hiring decisions and suboptimal candidates getting hired (and thus making the company dysfunctional). A dysfunctional recruiting process could also be biased towards high false negatives (aka a lot of deserving candidates not getting hired) without being accompanied by high false positives (aka a lot of bad candidates getting hired).

> I am sure they are also more likely to ignore customer complaints

This is not directly relevant to the experience of an employee at such a company.

Look, I do not approve of those practices. I believe that every candidate deserves a closure on the status of their application, even if it is something as low-bar as an automated rejection. I also believe that good customer support is a sign of a company being enjoyable to work at. However, the absence of those is not necessarily an indicator of a good workplace imo. And the opposite could be true as well. E.g., Amazon customer support being top notch and going above and beyond what I expected of them as a user, but they also have by far the most obnoxious recruiting experience I’ve ever encountered. And the stories from my friends who worked there just made me never consider working there ever, just from the quality of it as a workplace.

And, for context, the list of companies I have on that list is so tiny, it could be counted on half of a singular hand.
Yes, Congress can solve this buy doing their job and passing a law to clarify the fact. The fact they don't demonstrates the dysfunction in the US, and the craziness that everyone thinks they can get the executive branch to do an end run around the constitution.
Ironic that I get a few responses with "I am wanting to do the project".

I did it around 10 years ago and I think I've seen one a year since that. I didn't bother once I saw that people shipping were doing well and increasing their dataset only for it to be severely reduced later (I assume due to threats of legal action.)
Ask HN: Is there any reason why I shouldn't get a .dev domain?
Even though my three characters name is not that common, its .com is taken so I'm looking for alternatives.

I can get abc.dev though, it's available in Namecheap for example. But my concern is, is .dev reliable? I know that past year Google sold the domains business, in fact, I moved some other domains I had registered in Google to a different registrar, so, as Google was (is?) the owner of .dev, I would like to know whether there are some reliability issues now like poor performance, spam, etc.
For those curious,

loginctl enable-linger <user>

will allow you to use systemd user services for users that are not logged in: https://manpages.org/loginctl

If you're using systemd as a service manager (which you probably should do, if your hosts are running systemd?), you don't need the user running your services to be a system user. You can just have (either) your services launch from a systemwide systemd service, or make sure your user has lingering enabled if you're using systemd user services.

If you're not using systemd to manage your application's services, you can still use the methods above if you just have systemd launch your process supervisor of choice (which you should definitely do if your hosts are running systemd and you're using some other process supervisor).

If you want to leave user processes running when you've started them manually and no user session exists anymore, you can unset KillUserProcesses in logind.conf: https://www.man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/logind.conf.5.html
You must still be looking where you want to shoot otherwise you could point in any direction since "you're just looking at the iron sights". By that logic I could make any distance shot even if I couldn't see anything past 1m.
Boeing has a decision to make: keep investing in Starliner, or cut the program now, and avoid having to do a bunch of rework to fix it plus at least one more test flight (and possibly two?) on their own dime.

It's not really clear (to me) how likely either of those outcomes is right now.

IF they drop it, then I would expect NASA to run a new commercial crew program. They need redundancy, and they don't want to be running the development process themselves.

Dream Chaser Space System (their crewed variant) is almost certainly the best-placed candidate to win an award from that program: they have an almost-flying cargo variant that was originally designed to be human rated, and existing plans to complete the crewed variant.

SpaceX might get some money for Starship, although I would expect NASA to try to write the rules such that they're not eligible. While having two options from a single company is better than just one, a fully-independent option would be better.

Blue Origin has some experience with the New Shepard capsule, and is working on their Blue Moon lander: I expect that they would cobble together a proposal, and perhaps between their previous experience in losing bids due to over-pricing, and NASA's experience with Starliner's fixed-price failure, the price might end up somewhere in the middle?

Maybe Northrop-Grumman would propose a Cygnus-derived vehicle? It'd need a human-rated launcher -- Dream Chaser would likely be using Vulcan, and Falcon9 is a dependency on SpaceX. NG would probably like to use its own Antares 330 booster, but then they'd be running both a crew vehicle and a booster program which is a lot of money and risk.

It's not entirely implausible that someone buys Starliner from Boeing, and attempts to complete the development (if Boeing gives up). Blue Origin is possibly the most likely candidate? They have Jeff's cash mountain, and a kinda compatible "old space" culture -- if Boeing is willing to sell it at a reasonable price, it's possibly a cheap way to get 80% of the way there?

Given the results from this commercial crew round (a likely 50% success), funding two programs with the expectation of one success seems reasonable. Whether they are able to get commercial interest in a fixed-price award like last time is an open question, as is who might apply.

Interesting times.
If it wasn't so linux distribution unfriendly…
Good find, thanks.

That one is looking more familiar the more screenshots I see of it, but I think I might be mixing memories of two programs - this, and "CPU Sim" which I mention in a reply to the sibling comment.
But... they did pass that law. It was the Clean Air Act.
> but since Citizens United those donations have absolutely exploded

That case has implications respecting third party advertising but it has no bearing on direct campaign contributions to candidates.

> combine that with the gerrymandering of districts into very safe districts

The purpose of this gerrymandering is to reduce the total voter turnout. Most senators get elected with less than half the voting population turning out, many as little as 25%. Which means currently only 1/8 of your population needs to vote for you to win.

It's really a vulnerability they've created for themselves, but you have to have the confidence to run as a third party candidate in order to take advantage of this. This is a uniparty game that strengthens the false dichotomy and not really material for our purposes here.

> public pressure might no longer be sufficient to sway those politicians, the jury is still out on that.

Is there a case where significant public pressure has failed? Saying "voters want action on climate change" is meaningless. Of course they do. Who actually _wants_ to ruin the planet or destroy their health? Nobody.

How do we do this? Which metrics do we use? Who is responsible for implementation? What impacts will this have on average citizens? These are the questions that need answering, and unfortunately, there's too much actual division on these issues to foment a clear _federal_ plan forward let alone anything that would be effective or enforced world wide.
I guess it depends on your equipment. 2000*50MB gets you up to 100GB. A decent 128GB card costs you from $20 up. A card that's capable of fast bursts can cost around $100.
> And nothing gets even fucking close in terms of productivity to C#.

C# gets compared to java a lot for a good reason, and yet the languages and ecosystems have since diverged in their priorities and abilities. This gets even more complicated when considering F# and Scala. Do you think Java would offer similar productivity, or are there aspects to the C# that are—in your personal experience—uniquely productive?
Yes. I'm not aware of any documentation walking one through it though.

There is a extension api that exposes a CDP connection [1][2]

You can create a Puppeteer.Browser given a CDP connection.

You can bundle Puppeteer in a browser (we do this in Lighthouse/Chrome DevTools[3]).

These two things is probably enough to get it working, though it may be limited to the active tab.

[1] https://chromedevtools.github.io/devtools-protocol/#:~:text=...

[2] https://stackoverflow.com/a/55284340/24042444

[3] https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/main:thi...
They're less interested in things like verifying your couple dollars of interest and more interested in things like money laundering and identifying assets to seize. Particularly setting money limits leads to what is known as "smurfing" to try to hide the activity. Not that I'm saying you must therefore consider these reasons good enough but throwing out strawment like a couple dollars interest is not highlighting what you'd like it to.
May i ask why?
Lego Product Idea: Technics SL-1200 MK2 Turntable
While I agree with you in principle, that the friction is "as designed," I still say our system is broken -- even when there are things which a supermajority of people agree on, our legislators are unable to craft solutions which align which the majority of people agree with, without inserting things which are designed to cater to tiny minority special interests, which can effectively "poison pill" a bill so that nobody likes it (even if it's passed).

Alternatively, we pass giant tomes of legislation (esp budgets) which literally nobody can understand let alone agree on.