skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
1. that's actually pretty neat. Collecting dependencies like Signals but without the callback... I retract my reservations :)

3. I was thinking of any arbitrary event source that supports the typical subscribe/unsubscribe pattern. Either push based like rxjs or pull based like Reacts useSyncExternalStore. rxjs would probably require some extra work to integrate error handling, and I prefer that the pull based approach is just generally more friendly to debugging, tracing & stack traces.

4. That example looks reasonable to me, although we're now once again running into the problem of starting with uninitialised state and only later populating it. In the case of local storage it's not much of a problem since you need a default-value anyways, but what if we try to derive data from react-query? I agree that the framework itself should be agnostic of the actual storage method though.

2, 3 and 4 are all different facets of the same requirement: An observability solution must be able to derive from any external source, or we are back to doing most of our derivations inside react hooks. At least that's the issue I always ran into when dealing with redux, react-query & co. I would have 40% of my state in redux, 40% in react-query, 10% in the URL, 10% in local storage. Then I would do most of the heavy transformations with react hooks, because that's the only place which allows me to combine all sources. Im aware that some of this could be solved with redux middleware / rtk-query, but then you're once again loosing type-safety due to every component needing to handle the uninitialised case.

You were absolutely right in saying that observability is better than reconciliation for state management. However, I think this does not only apply to state management but to all types of derived data, including server state, local storage etc...
Linear Algebra Notes by Terence Tao [pdf]
Who are you to say what would make people's lives better?
The article is certainly somewhat incoherent.

But there's a hint of dishonesty in your retort too: obviously, there are competitors who would pay more (and they are paying more elsewhere, since their margins are so much smaller than Apple's), but for much smaller quantities of production. A supplier like Foxconn can't afford to lose a customer like Apple because they were already selling their services cheap with low margins. Apple is basically squeezing them ever more — instead of growing business needs leading to improved conditions for employees, Foxconn is forced to provide more for less because Apple can demand that "or else".

I am not saying this is true, but this line of thinking is still obvious just from the short quote you posted.
Tab Groups is another feature that FF recently prioritized in their roadmap. I would expect it to be integrated with this feature.
Early days but this is what I believe the future of 'product development' looks like.
This does not sound like a complete picture. Apple might depress the prices for themselves, but not for other fab customers. On the contrary, if there is a supply issue, with one customer getting all the production, then prices should go up overall, helping competing fabs. In a situation with a huge production shortfall, it becomes a matter of initial capital, with which governments can help effectively (either with subsidies or with tax incentives). If the customers are there and demand is strong, eventual RoI should be ok.

In your example, not only has the government huge bargaining power, but the law itself limits other customers, and this there is no demand outside of the government. In contrast, there are plenty of customers for semiconductors. Demand is still here.

So yes, Apple might reduce TSMC’s margin, but the real problem is not that. It’s that there is nobody else operating on the same scale. The fact that there is no alternative for cutting edge nodes is a sign of a market failure.

Besides, this “it’s Apple fault and they depress margins” sounds disingenuous. Apple famously invested quite a lot in TSMC’s fabs in exchange for this access to the latest nodes. And TSMC also benefits from stable, predictable demand. The real problem is the spectacular failure of Intel and the complete lack of effectiveness of the handful of governments that could do something. Things seem to be changing, even if it is slow, but we should never have been in that situation in the first place.
> It feels disingenuous to say ARM is the panacea when designing ARM cores would have left Intel in an even worse position.

Sorry, where does the article say Intel should design Arm cores in 2024?
A trademark isn't a total prohibition on using someone else's name.

You can still use their name where there is no likelihood of consumer confusion.

Obviously many companies choose not to to avoid a lawsuit over the issue - but it's unlikely NVidia would win over this method name.
> aspartame is probably the least harmful

I'm not doubting you, but it's interesting because this is the only one that gives me noticeable problems, although for decades I had no issue with it. Then one day it just started where any time I try to drink a diet soda (with aspartame), I now get massive headaches... no idea why.
GoDaddy phases out domain backorders
Juxtapose with [https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41196459] .

Advertisers enable his shenanigans. Presumably UK advertisers are in favor or destabilizing their own country.
The new developer toolchain for the age of AI
I think it’s certainly doable and sustainable.

Pitfalls you’re not considering:

Maintaining it. It will have an ongoing cost of keep things running, secure, up to date. This will get bigger and bigger as the project becomes more integral.

The right mindset. You don’t want devs who approach this as is they’re building the next Amazon or Google. You don’t want it over engineered and have devs trying to be too clever/ padding out their own CVs. This might also make it pretty boring.

Unless you have some dev who is very interested or experienced in logistics you’ll need a some people from the business investing time helping explain what the feature is and acceptance testing it.
By continously ignoring that what I really needed was a pushdown automaton.
"Battle-tested" wouldn't be the word I'd use to describe WordPress. It's easy to make a website with it, hence the 40-something percen of all sites, but it's just a huge pile of bad patterns mixed together and nothing more.
Interesting links. Appreciated.-
Amid Layoffs and CPU Controversy, Intel Postpones Innovation Event
Was V.I. Arnold wrong when he said everything a student needs to know about determinants is derived from geometric considerations? It seems true to me that, outside of advanced study linear or abstract algebra, this is the one perspective which can at least dispel the magic.
I feel like every name or phrase will inevitably be offensive in some language.
The cheapest one I've seen so far is the XIAO RP2350, which is $5, same as the official Pico board. I'm sure there will be more cheap options once more Chinese manufacturers get their hands on the chips, no-name USB-C RP2040 boards are ridiculously cheap.
The NVidia software stack has the "no use in datacenters" clause. Is this a workaround for that?
Update on the Roblox Ban in Türkiye
1. Intel didn't have big fabs 20 years ago, so they didn't have anything to offer Apple that would resemble TSMC's partnership.

2. There's no money in designing licensed CPU cores as a middleman for a company that drives margins so low they're associated with suicide nets and forced labor.

3. If TSMC is lost due to Chinese aggression (which is a non-zero chance), Apple is left fabless and has to choose between importing Samsung silicon at-cost or partnering with Intel.
Hey, I spent multiple minutes designing that! ;)
Fair point about biological selection playing a part.

neutrinos (the only ones we can detect), however, are left handed.

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/240502/why-only-....

We simply point to the neutrino. left v right solved?
Codes of Conducts are "cider house rules" that are rarely or never followed with consistency or fairness. As such, they are absolutely pointless because the social contract is already implicit. Their existence merely reinforces a form of elitism.

> The name "The Cider House Rules" refers to the list of rules that migrant workers are supposed to follow at the Ocean View Orchards. However, none of them can read, and they are completely unaware of the rules – which have been posted for years. [Basically, they're a EULA.]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cider_House_Rules
A trademark is scoped to a specific industry / application.

Starlink for internet is unlikely to be confused with STARLINK for Subaru car safety systems. (Perhaps the all caps also helps if they were sued)

Trademark applications are scoped so that you can’t monopolize a name, you only own the name within the industry you operate in.

For example, there’s a real estate investment fund named Apple and even trades with stock ticker APLE.
You're exactly right, sorry. I meant that even with tests it's probably too subtle to do the standard test driven design method of programming, you have to be way more careful.
Plant, insect, and fungi fossils under Greenland evidence of ice-free times
Sorry about that - can you try one more time? I just added some additional logging
Yes. I do not pretend to be rational like the youtube and instagram stoics do.
> Not sure if meeting rooms are critical part of RTO efficiencies in anyone's mind.

No, it's not the point people bring up -- they like to talk about being able to just walk over to someone to ask them a question, or quickly form a huddle to resolve an issue. The claim is generally that people work more efficiently in the office.

Whereas my experience has been that (a) remotely, creating a slack thread is fast and easy but (b) in office sometimes when you want to huddle, there wasn't a room for it. My claim is that the office itself was often a bottleneck on productivity.
Key graf

"Researchers recently analyzed fossils taken from the center of the Greenland ice sheet, widely considered to be the largest annual contributor of water into the ocean. The fossils were found to have organic matter, indicating an ice-free period during the Pleistocene Epoch, about 400,000 years ago, according to a study published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences."
No panic at all.

Mortgage systems were already fixed in 1970 (think about it).

Other loan management systems had to be fixed well before 2000 - you get a 5 year car loan in 1996 and guess what?

Embedded systems, which is what I was working on at the time, don't really give two shits about clock time. They care about interval time: i.e., the time between two events.

Most of the impacted systems were regulatory reporting systems - you know, the end-of-year, end-of-quarter, end-of-month type reports.

Yes, there were some issues, but it really wasn't that big of a deal, and most of the work to resolve the biggest issues had already been done years earlier. But it was a great press story! :)
Exploring how to plot execution plots
Just a simple exploration of a few plotting approaches.
I prefer people who keep makers (or hackers) honest, because those tend to be honest too.

The experiment is already cool, why needlessly embezzle it?
How does one measure "double the risk"? Does that mean if one person in a control group happened to have a stroke in that time period, and now it's two people, that counts as double? Out of 4000? Surely that can't be right.
This book is an incredibly good read: "'The Making of the Atomic Bomb' is a history book written by the American journalist and historian Richard Rhodes, first published by Simon & Schuster in 1987. The book won multiple awards, including Pulitzer Prize for General Non-Fiction. The narrative covers people and events from early 20th century discoveries leading to the science of nuclear fission, through the Manhattan Project and the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki."

Possibly the best book that I have ever read. It deals with many of the issues raised in the comments here, and with politics, industrial development, economics, military capabilities, and the history of modern physics.

Rhodes also wrote "'Dark Sun: The Making of the Hydrogen Bomb', which told the story of the atomic espionage during World War II, the debates over whether the hydrogen bomb ought to be produced, and the eventual creation of the bomb and its consequences for the arms race." Also impeccable

Info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Making_of_the_Atomic_Bomb
You were right about the Memories! I found that "Memory updated" thing at one point, so that would explain the Motivation Letter examples.

But...

"Memory is disabled. ChatGPT won't use or create memories."

and nothing is stored there. Weird.

Still, the on-the-fly translation remains a mystery
That article is one of the several engagements he's been putting on recently in the right-sphere.

His most damning quote was from 2023 that “fundamentally, my view is that authoritarianism is coming from the private sector,” not from those who’d attempt to seize control of democratic institutions by force. [0]

> Trump will "most likely" fire Lina Khan and hire Matt Stoller

He doesn't need to fire Lina Khan (though he most likely would) because Melissa Holyoak's term is expiring in 2025

[0] - https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/04/21/matt-stoll...
Can I enable the social login with this tool directly, without manually creating and setting up the "app"/"project" on those social platforms?
There are a lot of ex-Dropbox people at Figma who might have learned firsthand that bringing your stuff on-prem under a theory of saving money is an intensely stupid idea.
They had the entire suite of Watcomm products: APL, Basic, Cobol, Fortran, Pascal. The Watcomm tools were great, there was some magical linker that let you connect Cobol and Fortran tools together.

Burroughs was always big on being able to network computers together. Their B20 line was awesome on the amount of sharing you could do between systems. Lots of sites had one or two machines with disks on them, the rest would use the network to get to the data. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burroughs_B20
That is deeply disingenuous. The Marshall Plan transferred massive aid and hugely sped up reconstruction in Europe: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Plan

‘The Marshall Plan made it possible for West Germany to return quickly to its traditional pattern of industrial production with a strong export sector. Without the plan, agriculture would have played a larger role in the recovery period, which itself would have been longer. With respect to Austria, Günter Bischof has noted that "the Austrian economy, injected with an overabundance of European Recovery Program funds, produced "miracle" growth figures that matched and at times surpassed the German ones."’

Aid to Japan was similarly crucial and amounted to billions of dollars. These payments were separate from the Marshall Plan, which focused on Europe. Pre-war Japan was not a free market economy and subsequently underwent massive reform.

Honestly, I get that it’s cool to bash on the US (I am not American) but give credit where it’s due. US-led post-war reconstruction was of enormous and lasting significance.
It wouldn't be. People are just afraid of vertical integration because they equate it to vertical monopolies, when the fact of vertical integration does not itself mean that there is a vertical monopoly.
In server CPUs, Intel still has a larger market share than AMD, but judging for the published financial results, where most of the loss is in server CPUs, Intel has succeeded to keep that diminishing market share only by accepting a great loss caused by huge discounts, which has determined the action price fall, so perhaps trying so hard to retain the market share has not been an optimal decision.

So AMD definitely leads over Intel from the POV of the profits obtained in the server CPU market segment.

There are also various small markets where AMD leads comfortably over Intel by volume, e.g. Amazon currently sells much more AMD CPUs than Intel CPUs.
>whereas actual # of units produced is likely not an easy number to find?

"Global Smartphone Shipments (Millions)"

https://www.counterpointresearch.com/insights/global-smartph...
Generic dispatching all the type combinations (or warning or erroring) wouldn't be a problem in a project the scale of the Linux kernel.

I'm unfamiliar with the incantations needed to try preserve constant expressions though, that might be too much for them.
The referenced study's methods did NOT account for the fact that overweight people are more likely to be consuming erythritol and/or on a keto diet. Highly likely to be confounding.
You need to remove a lot of things from that list. Almost all of that functionality is available in build tools that have been available for decades. I want to emphasize the DECADES.

And then all you're left with is scaling. Which most business do not need.

Almost everything you've written there is a standard feature of almost any CI toolchain, teamcity, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, etc., etc.

We were doing it before k8s was even written.
Whoever thinks this is good advice has an extremely easy life. Most people have literally no slack time at all. You're supposed to execute your great plans in the 1 hour per day you have after work, commute, taking care of family, and occasionally taking care of yourself? The hour in which you are deeply exhausted? If that doesn't sound like you, congratulations: you have an easy life.

So the real advice is the same as all life advice under the hood: just be born into privilege.
What industry, what software, and what is your budget? If it is profitable to build and more than one customer, I am sure numerous people here would jump on the idea.
This wouldn't be widely considered open source since your license puts limitations on use & distribution [1].

[1] https://github.com/trynyro/nyro-app/blob/5a5884126d83ecab89c...
Having had the fun of taking over a project from a bunch of clever contractors I would caution: It may be too clever. There is value in simplicity and a stake in long term ownership. Some article here recently associated technical debt as lost institutional knowledge so handing the most key decisions to contractors has also drawbacks. One needs an integrated approach for design, build, maintenance and operation.
(simplifying) ARM provides verified, tested, standardized, reasonably well designed chips (logic circuits) that your company can purchase a license for and then send that chip design / logic circuit to be etched on a wafer, cut, encapsulated, and soldered to a printed circuit board.

Those ARM CPUs support a standard (but ARM-flavored) assembly programming language. (Formally: Instruction Set Architecture)

Designing your own chip previously was risky because you might have logic or hardware bugs in your chip that were very hard to debug, and then you hope that someone will bother to write assembly code that works on your chip. Since you probably designed your own assembly language that co-evolved with your chip, those assembly code developers are going to be sinking a lot of time into understanding your chips and assembly code quirks to wring performance out of them.

RISC-V standardizes a RISC-V flavored assembly code (ISA) and also provides some certification test packages to prove that "this particular chip design" can execute the RISC-V assembly language according to specifications.
But the 85% figure is almost certainly profit, not revenue. In that case using that as a proxy for units sold is so absurd that it's bordering on bad faith argumentation.
A weird article.

Apple was not the first or the only company to look to East Asia for cheap manufacturing, elctronic equipments, chips, or cheap labor. The trend was started and accelerated by motor companies and hardware just followed suit.

Then, some other points are just...there. Apple is America's semiconductor problem because Apple is so big it purchases things in bulk and gets discounts - like every other big company in every industry.

TSMC sold 100% of the capacity to Apple for 3nm chips because no one else had the designs ready, Apple needed them in bulk, and the yield wasn't that high. It is problematic, but you need to mention these things when making a claim.

The problem is two fold - other companies are not really innovating and experimenting at semis with a scale at which Apple is. This is a market failure more than an Apple failure. Others were reliant on Qualcomm, broadcomm, samsung, and Intel, with slower pace of innovation. Then there is Asian countries with cheap economies of scale.

It's one thing to assume the most nefarious intent from the start and then look at everything from that lens. It mostly leads to paranoia, not insight.
That person could have other unknown problems though... I find it hard to believe that 1 person can ever be enough to quantify anything.
I think we’d be better served with 3 or 4 companies with close-enough-to-cutting-edge fabs than just Intel. The times when Intel was the undisputed king were not that good in the long run. We need alternatives.
National Park Service Will Cite AWD Drivers for Driving on 4WD-Only Trails
So because Apple makes higher profit, they purchase a higher proportion of the highest quality parts. And the fact that they choose to purchase from Asia is bad because we want domestic production? I guess I can buy it, but I feel like this is more of a failure of American fabs more than anything.
However in the Netherlands it is permitted
now if only neotame was mass produced.. (100x aspartame's potency but requires more synthetic steps to reach)
I think lots of people have faced this challenge. There are several tools that will find and allow you to purge exact duplicates, such as dupeguru.
It's still not 100% clear if the nuclear bombing was necessary to force the Japanese to surrender, the Soviet invasion of Manchuria could have been enough, making the civilian casualties in Hiroshima and Nagasaki pointless victims.
Wow. I think your comment says more about you than anyone who owns an Apple device.
You are right for multi-core performance, but Intel has still a slight edge in single-core performance, and in idle power usage, which is important to many. Intel also has a stronger offering in the now-popular mini PC segment.
Hi, my ex colleague pointed me here.

This is exactly what we specialize in: logistics and transport digitization.
we are www.lowcode.co.nz and have experience and connections in EU, but NZ needs some help with digital maturity (and much nicer weather here too).

We are currently building our SAAS platform for cranes and hiabs called mothertrucking.co.nz (sign up for free as we are in stealth beta)

What you have mentioned is exactly the pain we see a lot in this industry, (tools get made, then the budget stops, and it becomes hard to maintain, and all the original devs have moved on to more fun projects.)

Id be keen to have a talk to understand your struggles.
Yes.

But it will show our name and logo, and we limit shared key usage to a few users per project, so we highly recommend you set up your own keys before going into production. (The dashboard will let you know in time.)
I'm not sure if the premise holds. Most of the people I know who use sugar replacements or consume products with them are from the fitness crowd.
Subaru Starlink is a wireless communication network for Subaru cars, it lets the cars make phone calls to Subaru customer support and emergency services. I believe it's also how Subaru cars update their car navigation. It is a subscription service.

SpaceX Starlink is a wireless communication network for internet service, including on-the-road service. It is a subscription service.

You tell me this doesn't confuse people who aren't privy to the technical details.