skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Show HN: Enhanci – tool to build a no-code pricing table for your website
Hey everyone,
Some time ago I noticed that there are a lot of outdated and simply saying ugly pricing pages in the internet, so I created a tool to build a modern pricing table using design templates and A/B tests.

You could make a pricing table with a comparison plans table for your website (for example if you are a startup and wants to do it quickly and be able to customise it easily, or it would be useful if you offer some packages on your website).

I'd be happy if you could play with it and give your feedback and if you have some ideas how to expand this product to be useful for more users.
> It is impossible to separate a cube into two cubes

Later disproved by the Banach-Tarski theorem. ;D
Selling of all risky assets tends to be correlated. It's called "risk off" sentiment.

This happens because when one asset drop in price, leveraged investors (i.e. those who borrowed to buy) may get "margin calls" from their lenders. This means that the total value of their portfolio (when including the loan) is in danger of going negative, and they may need to sell everything.
You put words onto page with which given a thousand I could not have equaled. We will all follow, in time.

"I see life as a roadside inn where I have to stay until the coach from the abyss pulls up. I don't know where it will take me, because I don't know anything. I could see this inn as a prison, for I'm compelled to wait in it; I could see it as a social center, for it's here that I meet others. But I'm neither impatient nor common. I leave who will to stay shut up in their rooms, sprawled out on beds where they sleeplessly wait, and I leave who will to chat in the parlors, from where their songs and voices conveniently drift out here to me. I'm sitting at the door, feasting my eyes and ears on the colors and sounds of the landscape, and I softly sing - for myself alone - wispy songs I compose while waiting.

Night will fall on us all and the coach will pull up. I enjoy the breeze I'm given and the soul I'm given to enjoy it with, and I no longer question or seek. If what I write in the book of travellers can, when read by others at some future date, also entertain them on their journey, then fine. If they don't read it, or are not entertained, that's fine too."

Fernando Pessoa, The Book of Disquiet
You really don't want to use the batteries. They will puff up very soon.
Lego specifically lasts pretty long, I've got some of them at home that survived three generations of kids.
But apart from that I do feel like there's way to much plastic in toys, so I'm curios - do you have any good recommendations for alternatives? There seems to be plenty of wooden toys for toddlers, but not so much for kids older than 4.
It can always go lower, but this is called bear porn.

Path of least resistance is higher; too high too fast for too long causes people to lever up and this blows up sometimes, like in the past few sessions.

Question is how much of the carry trade will unwind now. Regulators will socialize the losses if it happens all at once, that you can be sure of.
Then the next question is why your asset formats require such heavy processing after loading. Normally you'd convert any data into custom engine formats in an offline step in the asset pipeline so that the files can be dumped directly into memory ready for the engine (and 3D API) to be used without an expensive deserialization process.

FWIW, POSIX style multithreading in WASM is supported everywhere for a while now again (it was disabled after Spectre/Meltdown) but is locked behind special COOP/COEP HTTP headers for security reasons (so you either need to be able to configure the web server to return those headers, or use a service worker to inject the headers on the client side.
Not really. But the lawyers they retained for this lawsuit will have fun pumping their billables reading through mountains of Delta bullshit.
Doug Lenat's AM (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automated_Mathematician) seems relevant.
> I was kinda hoping to see this was the next generation of Lisp language design, but it appears to be just a different syntax.

Dig deeper in the reference documentation.
The problem with The Guardian challenging a narrative is challenging is that said narrative seems to be true.

Ars Technica and CNBC are both reporting that Boeing does not know what is causing the thruster failures. Without knowing that, no amount of testing that Boeing bragged about doing in that embarrassing Friday tweet can eliminate risk to NASA's satisfaction, and rightly so. If the cause were known, it's possible that NASA and Boeing could work around the issue. But since the issue is not known, it doesn't matter if 28 of 29 thrusters on Starliner are working, or 289 of 290; they're all suspect.

The article also does not mention SpaceX or Dragon at all except as an aside near the end. Thus there is no mention, as Ars and CNBC have also reported, of internal NASA discussions about using Dragon to retrieve the Starliner crew.
You switch topics. There are useless people. Not talking about them. Ignore useless people.

You and your good useful programmer coworkers do 80% llmable bullshit, 20% good stuff. So among you, if your boss is smart he will fire 80% of you and spread 20% non-llmable work across remaining people. You hope your coworker gets fired, your coworker hopes it's you, and you both help make it happen
Automated tests ideally don't entirely replace manually executed tests. What they do replace is repetitive regression tests that don't need to be executed manually.

In an ideal world this opens up room for exploratory testing where someone goes "off-script" and focuses specifically on those areas that are not covered by your automated tests.

The thing is that automated tests aren't really tests, even though we call them that. They are automated checks at specified points, so they only check the outcome at those point in time. So yeah, they are also completely blind from the sort of thing a human* might easily spot while using the application.

*Just to be ahead of the AI bros, we are not there yet, hold your horses.
The point is that over even fairly short time it will go higher more than it goes lower.
I question the life choice of anyone that chose to have a 3h commute and apparently they do to because they would like to WFH. I think a lot of people are blaming their companies for situation they put themselves in but that’s on trend with the spirit of the time.
You can do it like Easyjet. They have normal easyJet EZY, easyJet Switzerland S.A. EZS, easyJet Europe Gmbh EJU. Problem solved. OK they have a lot fewer planes than United but 99% of their flights are short (<3h) so they probably need similar number of flight numbers
It is actually straightforward to obtain dollar amounts from the claims. Past few years have seen an uptick in single natural disasters causing more than a billion dollars in insured losses.
I think it rather depends on the page (some pages with lots of dynamically generated content might mark themselves as no-cache/no-store), and in any case if you don't use a tab long enough, sooner or later it'll be evicted from the browser cache.
> and obviously cannot work once you realize that std::variant is just syntax sugar over a tagged union

It would be easy to make it work, there isn't necessarily a strict relation between the template parameter and the actual stored object. Not having reference variant members was a conscious decision, same as optional<T&>. Hopefully this will be fixed in the future.
Actually, it probably simply closed the wrong window. Just like you can reopen the last tab, you can also reopen the last closed window. I run into this issue all the time when I open a second window and close the main window first.
Why would a high amount of trades trigger circuit breakers? That is just network traffic not power load, no?
Your courage in not withdrawing in your sickness, of being open with all of us about your journey and what you've learned, is heroic. It's an amazing example of how to be a mensch to leave behind for your daughter.
My guess is the roast version looks at the repo details/descriptions (or at least a few of them - which is why the reply seems much more specific/cutting) where as far as I can tell the praise version here only looks at readme/top level profile info.
Blame Reuters for putting out what you describe as "clickbait".

Or maybe, just maybe, a 13% one-day drop in the stock market of one of the world's largest economies is worth of discussion by HN?
If you think it takes a long time for ipv6 to "take over" in the old back bone infrastructure of the internet, trust me you have seen nothing compared to making that kind of change in air travel back bones.
Sure, but I wasn't talking about long term, I meant to point out that it's foolish to say "but my folio still up tho?", especially this early while things are still unraveling.
> `enum class` enums are actually Newtypes

They indeed are. I find myself using enums classes as strong typedefs more often than actual enums.
• NVIDIA $NVDA: -11%
• Google $GOOGL: -11%
• Apple $AAPL: -10%
• Amazon $AMZN: -10%
• Meta $META: -10%
• Tesla $TSLA: -10%
• Microsoft $MSFT: -9%

https://x.com/WatcherGuru/status/1820355633008296324#m
Or I could have /home/junk, self-cleaning but never!
here, have an upvote, and a quote:

"we have exclusive features like 'inclusiveness' and competitive features like 'collaboration'."

>and I'm sold

requested buzzwords are above, I'm told.
You're really underestimating how much the folding helps with handling.

The shortened length makes it extremely easy to handle with a single hand, and fits much better inside a pocket (a lot less cumbersome to pull out of a tight spot!)

Depending on how long my device lasts, I might make the move permanently to folding phones.

t. daily driving a Galaxy Z Flip 5
Shouldn't they had started thinking about that 20 years ago as to be ready now?
The argument you make here might be right, but it's beside the point I was making.

My point was narrowly that most of the argument made in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41156898 applies to paper voting as well.

For what it's worth, I prefer paper ballots, but I don't think that makes all arguments for them automatically valid.
Intel's specifications are readily available[1][2] to the public. If you can't understand them that's your problem, not Intel's.

Incidentally, there is no such thing as a "baseline". Intel separately specifies an "Extreme Config" for applicable SKUs (the i9s), but otherwise there is only the one set of specifications.

The fact you are talking about "baseline" suggests you did not actually consult the specifications published by Intel, just like the mobo vendors who put out so-called "Intel Baseline Profiles" before they got chastised again for not actually reading and obeying the specs (and arguably they still don't).

[1]: https://edc.intel.com/content/www/us/en/design/products/plat...

[2]: https://edc.intel.com/content/www/us/en/design/products/plat...
There is a pie chart of accountability, including some with Delta themselves. Microsoft carry some blame, but yes, the lion share is carried by CS.

Delta took 6 days to recover from something as impactful as this, which is much worse than any other airline. So much so, the US Transportation Department is currently reviewing why it took so long.

It is vital that any critical infrastructure such as this has a low MTTR, which Delta clearly failed to plan and test for, therefore the IMPACT that Delta felt cannot be solely attributed to CS, albeit they did trigger it, but Delta failed to mitigate the impact.
There seems to be a disagreement on terminology here. Would you agree that a hypothetical extremely communist society is automatically allocating capital correctly? Because under the definition you seem to be arguing for there is only one investor (the state), that investor has exactly one option under existing regulatory policy (the state's choice [0]) and therefore cannot misallocate capital.

That seems to be a weird understanding of capital allocation to me and my follow up if I'm reading you right is how would you describe a failure of central planning? They have capital, they misallocate it and get terrible results relative to the free market. Assuming that isn't capital misallocaiton to you, what is it?

It is hard for me to see how you'd even have a concept of capital misallocation that isn't implicitly "relative to a free market". Otherwise it'd be extremely challenging to even detect it even if capital was being deployed in a horribly stupid way.

[0] Noting that there are only administrative differences between the tax office taking $1 and spending it on something vs. the legislature telling someone that they have to spend $1 on the thing and that line of logic means that the state could implement its policies by directing investors.
> my current thinking on that is that an experienced software engineer will be able to work faster with and get much higher quality results from working with LLMS

> than someone without any software experience

- So you are betting against ML becoming good enough soon enough. I wouldn't be so sure considering the large amount of money and computing energy being thrown into it and small amount of resistance from programmers.

- Actually someone doesn't have to be zero experience. But if someone is mostly an llm whisperer to save boss some yacht time, instead of engineer, someone is paid according minimal wage.
Massa de pimentao has various recipes (as pretty much any sauce here). You can even buy in store different brands that have different flavour profiles. I guess you will have to tweak a more generic recipe to match the flavour you are looking for (or if you have some brand/restaurant you like, I can try and see if I can find it).
High amount of trades doesn’t, but the drops are what’s triggering the breakers.
IIRC for a brief period GCC considered values outside of the enumeration as UB and heavily optimized according to this. At some point this interpretetion made it as far as at least a draft standard. Then it got reverted as it went against decades of common usages and instead the opposite was made explicit in the standard.

Making it UB for enum classes was considered, but the strongly typeded alias use case was considered safer and more useful.
You sound like you're thinking of things colloquially, to put things in a kind way. Heritability is not a colloquial term and in biology/genetics refers exclusively to genetic factors. In particular it's the percent of difference in some value that cannot be explained by non-genetic factors. So e.g. if my IQ is 130 and yours is 90 then we'd have a difference of 40 points. With an adult IQ heritability of 80% we'd expect that about 32 points of that would be unable to explained outside of genetic factors.

Heritability does change over time because environments change over time. For instance in an area where starvation, lead poisoning, and malnutrition was common, the heritability of intelligence (or height) would generally be quite low, because the aforementioned environmental factors would be able to explain a large chunk of the differences between populations. But in a society where everybody had practically identical relevant upbringings and opportunities, the heritability of intelligence would be 100%, because the only difference between people would be genetic.

One of the many ways to test for heritability is twin studies. You'll likely find the correlation between lipstick wearing between identical and non-identical twins would be near to 100%. This means that the heritability of the trait would be near 0%.
Age is good at what it does, but note that afaik you probably should almost always pair it with something like signify[1], because age doesn't have integrity/authenticity verification (by design).

[1] https://man.openbsd.org/signify.1
let us know how it goes, if you do.... asking for a friend /s
Well, if you're discussing post-agriculture yes. The equation and density changes a lot pre-agriculture.

But regardless, rural != isolated. Children still go to school. This guy lives 10 miles (aka 10 minutes) from a "town", and that town is indeed where people get together.

That's the thing about actual rural living. There are no stoplight (which takes 2 to 4 minutes to cycle) which slows down miles-driven. There are no traffic jams. Everyone is typically doing 60mph. 1 mile per minute. 10 miles is 10 minutes.

I know people that take buses to "do city things", and it takes them > 1 hour to get anywhere. I know others that walk (20+ minutes) or drive (20+ minutes to get a mile away, or to get a few city blocks due to traffic).

"Having houses apart" doesn't mean isolated from other humans. At all. Heck someone with a "few hundred acres" is often within a mile of another house. As a kid, I used to bicycle 10+ miles to see friends in the summer (when there was no school), and why not? And in the winter, you see your friends daily at school.

You're not "living alone" because you're on a 200 acre parcel of land.

A person would need millions of acres to even feel as if they're living alone.
European and pretty hardcore introvert here: you're not mentioning the important fact that introverts are basically invisible to 99% of the fairer sex.
China's dramatic drop in air pollution may have prevented suicides in the 2010s
> Hint: if you think the way to test whether a needle is magnetized using another magnetized needle is by building both needles into two separate compasses, you're nowhere close.

I thought it was clear from my post that I do not think this.

I also think you are missing the point.
Circuit breakers are the term for exchanges shutting down trading if there’s unusual activity like too much of a price swing in one day.
The experts from Belenios do not recommend to use remote e-voting for high-stake elections [1]. Some issues they mention are the risks that the users sells their credentials or that a malware on their computer leaks who they voted for.

[1]: https://www.belenios.org/faq.html
Out-of-order execution doesn't imply parallelism, it was designed from the beginning to work around the input data availability problem.

In speculative execution and branch predictors, prefetch may seem just as a nice bonus, but given that nowadays CPU performance is largely bottlenecked by memory access, prefetch resulting from these techniques will often come out as the dominant performance factor.
I think it's also the jargon-laden complexity of investing. A safe choice for a lower income investor is called "FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRP)", which is meaningless mumbo-jumbo to most people.
And you can also open /proc/self/mem in a Rust program and overwrite whatever you want, including pointers. So?
Your understanding is not wrong, but it is not what this article is really about. There are lots of kinds of tomatoes, and there is at least one type that grows in the Mediterranean, that the author describes. If you are not familiar with this kind of tomato, you would simply reject it if you saw it: it doesn't look good, it is too large, too mushy, doesn't seem ripe. But then if you accidentally taste it, you realize that looks are not everything... I eat this kind of stuff when I'm in Greece, I'm guessing the Croatian variety is a bit different, but you can get these tomatoes in Italy or Spain as well. I presume they are not easy to transport, hence what you usually get in your average European supermarket is a produce of the Netherlands...
It's enough to make you start wondering: What isn't a byte code VM?!? Seems freaking everything is.

And is that a good thing? (My tentative answer: No, it isn't.)
Will all your team members also think about those edge cases when changing that part of the code? Will they ensure the behavior is the same when a library dependency is updated?

So, tests catch edge cases that someone else thought of but not everyone might have. This "not everyone" includes yourself, either yourself from the future (e.g. because some parts of the product are not so fresh in your mind), or yourself from now (e.g. because you didn't even know there was a requirement that must be met and your change here broke a requirement over there).

To put an easy to understand example, vulnerability checkers are still tests (and so are linters and similar tools, but let's focus on vulnerabilities). Your post implies you don't need them because you can perfectly prevent a vulnerability from ever happening again once you know about it, both because you write code that doesn't have that vulnerability and because you check that your dependencies don't have that vulnerability.

So, think of tests more like assertions or checksums.
The expression problem enters the room.
Bookmarks are a graveyard for tabs. Once you have bookmarked a tab, you 100% are never going to revisit the tab.
> ETFs, and hell, index funds if you must, outperform savings on a 3 year or even less horizon

Sure, they always do until they don't, right?

How is the US immune from having a Nikkei-like era? Not until earlier this year did it re-reach the highs originally set in 1989 -- 35 years!
Tests can be expensive to write if they are an afterthought, and/or the code is not written in way that is easy to test.

UI tests can be cheap but they require some experience in knowing how to write a testable UI. One way of achieving that is writing them as early as possible, of course. Which is not always possible :/
Wow, who'd have thought? Career change, here I come!
Thanks for the comment and suggestion on Postgres. I agree about the additional surface area of maintenance. However, the reason I used Redis was to become familiar with Redis in the Spring ecosystem. After writing in Python, Go, and Swift, I came back to Java and decided to become a strong Spring & Java developer. That's why I am writing Spring projects to solve different problems with different tech stacks. But now, because you mentioned it, I am interested in using Postgres as a message queue, and I will definitely try it in my future projects.
I assume “circuit breakers” is a technical term for some automatic system that is built in to the market to activate if some condition occurs, to alter market behavior.
How Postgres stores data on disk – this one's a page turner
People saying this is nothing. Yes, it is not productive for a longterm investor to focus on individual days (and I'm not panic selling now) but 13% down is a lot. The point isn't that 13% in itself is the end of the world (I'm still up 40% this year) but rather that it signals that the market thinks things are going to get bad. And that could be bad for our portfolios (and our jobs, etc).
watwut wrote:

> I know that when we do not have have the same bag again and then again the same bug and again the same bug.

Well, username checks out :-)
I assume you are talking about unit tests here.

Thinking of edge cases is exactly what unit tests are for. They are, when used properly, a way to think about various edge cases *before* you write your code. And then, once you have written your code, validate that it indeed does what you expected to do so beforehand.

The issue I am seeing, more often than not, is that people try to write unit tests after the fact. Which means that a lot of the value of them will be lost.

In addition to that, if you rewrite your code so often that it renders many of your tests invalid I'd argue that there is a fundamental issue elsewhere.

In more stable environments, unit tests help document the behavior of your code, which in turn helps when rewriting your code.

Basically, if you are just writing tests because people told you to write tests, it is no surprise you burn out over them. To be fair, this happens all too often. Certainly with the idiotic requirement added to it that you need 80% coverage without any other context.

If you write tests while understanding where they fit in the process, they can actually be valuable for you.
Server deployment/management tools like Ansible have their own file encryption and string encryption tools builtin.