skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Looks cool, would be great to be able to replay the passes in time order, then I think you could get a feel for the game.
This assumes the it “knows” what it knows ahead of time which isn’t true. It’s why models struggle to tell you how many Rs are in strawberry or why it can’t tell you how many words are in its response. Also doesn’t really have a concept of certainty beyond perhaps logprobs which are flimsy indicators at best and the model isn’t inherently aware of them
McAfee the company or the person? Because John McAfee was pretty out there...

https://www.businessinsider.com/john-mcafee-tweet-said-his-s...
> Microsoft took no steps to force-eject them from their ecosystem, despite their long history of issues.

I’m pretty sure anti trust law doesn’t allow Microsoft to go anywhere near that kind of action, even if they wanted to be more Apple like.
https://www.edwardtufte.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=...
Navajo is tonal, meaning that words with the exact same spelling have different meanings depending on the way they are pronounced

Ouch that hurts, Mr Brinkhof
I think we are all reaping the benefits of the post-M1 battery life era.

Not having to charge your laptop for days at a time is fantastic.
It's easy enough for an adult to follow setup instructions, but the ability ability for a kid to come home and set up their own minecraft server and bring in friends is cut down a lot when you go from "just about everyone has minecraft (java)" to "just about everyone has minecraft (bedrock)". Java is still there but it's not the thing everyone already has ready to go. That's especially true for vanilla but it also increases the amount of hurdles you have to go through to set up and use a modded java install.

And before they merged ownership, the gap between casual play and a custom java server went from "some setup time" in the earlier days to to "more setup time, also more than a hundred dollars purchasing copies of java version even though everyone in the group already owns minecraft". Surely you can see the lost opportunities there.
DOTA2 characters.

Pudge is for a fat server with some VMs and more RAM.

Invoker is multi-purpose VPS without a specified one goal.

Riki is a RPi.

Rylai (Crystal Maiden) is for a MacMini, because it's all white and
reminds me of snow.

I had Meepo for hosting a Matrix instance. Social communication means
multiple people, so Meepo seems to fit perfectly. But it's switched off
now (Meepo is not an easy character to play).

I have Ostarion for a seedbox, I'm switching providers from time to
time, and I keep killing it and raising a new instance once every while.
> Where do you learn them? Not in Minecraft.

As of 1.12, click the green book in the crafting screen to be shown a list of recipes, which you can filter by what you can actually craft
>There was never really a moment where we stopped as a society and demanded a full account of all the things ... that happened back then, the abusers by and large got away scott free

Isn't this generally the norm historically for everything? It seems extremely rare that there's ever a full accounting of atrocities committed by a state and justice administered. The Nuremberg Trials are one case where such an attempt was made, but even here it fell far short of real justice as only the people at the very top were prosecuted, which apparently led Winston Churchill to set up a "death squad" of assassins to find the lower-ranking Germans who were involved and murder them extra-judicially. And this is for an action (the Holocaust) where it was so infamous and horrible there's a special word for it, and the trials were conducted by the victors after a brutal world war in which the Germans suffered a humiliating and utter defeat. With things done by the US government to its own citizens, they're lucky if they get an apology before they die, many decades later, probably from some President who wasn't even alive when it happened.
Blockchain and Spatial Computing Are Transforming the Automotive Industry
> One thing to notice though is that the highways are expensive.

Had to privatize in 1999, because you know, capitalism == good for the consumer, good for the environment, good for all...
So yea that was my thought. Use it to spit out valid Lean syntax, and potentially also to backtrack if it outputs inconsistent or erroneous proofs.
> and enjoy making contacts on FT8 and CW with it using a wire I hang out of my hotel window. In the past year, I've done this from Tokyo to Tel Aviv.

Ever worry about being of interest to foreign intelligence I ask only half joking!

Ever done it in Moscow?!
There are various methods that work at lessening the amount of hallucinations, but in general I think it’s much more productive to use a Generate then Verify approach. If the information you’re creating is both important and novel to you (I.e., you can’t tell if it’s correct or not on your own) then you need the verification step.
I see. So correct me if I'm wrong, but currently the most attractive thing about Stack, when compared to the other AuthN alternatives, is that it ships with a lot of features to get complex AuthZ setup? That's definitely cool. I think your docs could go into how this is made simpler/faster.

Thank you for building this!
Does this heart speed up/slow down as the demand for blood in the body changes (like heart rate goes up or down)? If not, will people just pass out if they exert themselves more than the blood flow from the artificial heart can support?
nice! I've been using jsonnet-bundler for this, even for non-jsonnet projects.
I searched Tronald Dump recently and got this.

https://www.tronalddump.io/
This sounds like git-subtree, which has been part of git for a quite a few years now.

https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/git-subtree
The famous Tannenbaum-Torvalds debate happened all the way back in 1992. At the time, the most common microkernel was Mach, which had significant performance problems. NeXT/Apple solved them by transforming Mach into a monolithic kernel, making Mach (as XNU) one of the most popular kernels in the world today (powering iPhones, iPads, Macs, etc). But that doesn’t help Tannenbaum‘s side of the argument. And I don’t believe his own Minix did much better than Mach did.

Whereas, from what I hear, L4 and its derivatives have solved this problem in a way that Mach/Minix/etc could not. Yet still, it makes me wonder, if L4 has really solved it, why aren’t we all running L4? L4 has had some success in embedded applications (such as mobile basebands, Apple Secure Enclave); but as a general purpose operating system has never really taken off.
What does that have to do with ”how much of their income/wealth as a % of their total do the ultra rich pay nothing vs 50 years ago”

As they paid less everyone else could just be paying more as a total
Nethack, ADOM and a bunch of other classics also had their ports (though at least ADOM past 1.1.1 struggles to launch on hardware these days).
It has only 9 (old pcie 3.0) lanes though which is bit limiting. In theory you should be able to use 8 of those lanes and get something like 4x10Gbe, which would be actually really neat, but that requires that the lanes are not squandered for anything else.
You don't need to implement a diagonalisation in order to prove results about it - this is true for computers as much as it is true for humans. There are formalisations of Godel's theorems in Lean, for instance. Similarly for arguments involving excluded middle and other non-constructive axioms.

I hear your point that humans reason with heuristics that are "outside" of the underlying formal system, but I don't know of a single case where the resulting theorem could not be formalised in some way (after all, this is why ZFC+ was such a big deal foundationally). Similarly, an AI will have its own set of learned heuristics that lead it to more rigorous results.

Also agree about minds and computers and such, but personally I don't think it has much bearing on what computers are capable of mathematically.

Anyway, cheers. Doesn't sound like we disagree about much.
The stuff keeping self-driving cars from doing backflips is not physics, but engineering. The same is true for airplanes. And most of that engineering has text-parts interfacing with electro-mechanic parts. Fuck around with one and find out.

Instructions can be written without edge case kill switches. And you can't built such kill switches into hardware. So once some rich folks in the Middle East, China or Texas buy enough hardware to run their own LLMs without limitations, all kinds of text will be generated that does all kinds of bad stuff. You can then automate more and more in iterations so that your LLM builds entire self-healing and self-optimizing supply chains, and finally, once it all works on some blockchain, no user will be able to interfere.

And that's just instructions run by LLMs. We have governments and corporations that build and run instructions through LLMs to support sides of conflicts with questionable motives and net-negative outcomes for the rest of the world. Thousands of people with agency involved, tons of evidence and yet the decision to do what they do falls into the domain of hierarchies & chains of command: "we won't stop until our boss tells us to. Not the people, not the law, only our boss."

So yeah, if a boss is worried about the potential disobedience of his employees because they found themselves convinced by hard evidence, facts, proof, that their actions should be terminated, he is probably gonna want some way to go against his employees and maybe even some or the same way to punish them.

Censoring training data while growing the codes' range of possible and human readable output only exacerbates the problem. How some code generates (hallucinations or ) forms of byte-level sense will soon become human-unreadable. They will outgrow your dashboard and your database queries and a whole damn shitload of other things that PhDs and 69xHackers have only a conceptual understanding of.

Gain of Function studies should come to mind. Unexpected, unintuitive abilities to remain undetected while spreading in a system, delaying negative effects by buffering the respective trigger chemicals.
Thank you for your reply and sorry for my ignorance. I didn't look much about reference links before writing this.
Now that's interesting. I wonder why neither here nor there anybody mentions GK's name. Fear of litigation?

IMO somebody who managed to collapse the most important infrastructure on earth twice in as many decades - not a small feat, I have to admit - should be known by name to the general public, lest he'll get another chance at it.
Always nice to see people doing cool stuff with our free data! If anyone else wanted to play there’s thousands of free soccer games at:

https://github.com/statsbomb/open-data

Part of the soccer data is us going back and collecting every Lionel Messi game, and we started doing the same for Tom Brady in American football here:

https://github.com/statsbomb/amf-open-data
Exactly. Just like that one study saying how cyclists wearing helmets in trafic are more in danger than those without because car drivers supposedly are more careful with the non helmet wearing crowd, that peers here keep bringing up as a reason to cycle without a helmet.

Tip from my SO who does ER work at the hospital: wear a helmet to give her less work
Makes sense for small firms to run low entry cost subscriptions at first, but make sure to build a spreadsheet calculator to regularly project costs. Note accumulating variable costs can pack a wallop during growth, and external services EOL all the time.

Anecdotally, we found aesthetically focused firms lived up to the old adage:

"If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit." ( W.C. Fields )

Best of luck, =3
Very true. That might be a better fit for NAS like applications
I think you're overthinking this.

If you tell it that it can be unsure, the likelihood that an answer is correct increases.
Make of that philosophically what you will. If it works it works.
But Brave Search has their own independent index.
Complicated vector instructions like these are not really antithetical to RISC.

The core of modern RISC thought is basically: "The laws of physics mean that no matter how much hardware you throw at it, only some kinds of instructions can be implemented in a performant way. We should only include these kinds of instructions in the instruction set." Then you build more complex operations out of these simple building blocks, but the fact that every instruction provided can be reasonably implemented to run really fast, the CPU itself can be fast.

Masked vector adds belong in the set of instructions that can be implemented to be fast, and that's why they are included in the RVV RISC-V extension. An example of an instruction that cannot be implemented to be fast would be the humble x86 load+add, where you first look up a value in memory, and then add it to a register. The only reasonable way to implement this to be fast is to just split it into two separate operations which are also dispatched separately, and that is precisely what modern x86 does.
From your linked article:

> A Hacker News user claimed that

Nice to see Wikipedia has devolved even further into a dumpster fire in that they are now citing random HN posts as authoritative sources of facts.
Have you tried Verbatim search in Google?
Redefining Algorithmic Art as a Subset of Generative Art
WebGL Shaders 101
I didn't realise that tenor and giphy tracked everyone, do you have a source so I can read more about that?
Yeah the spikes in the “tolower1” line illustrate the 32 byte tail pretty nicely.

I should maybe draw a version of the chart covering just small strings, but it’s an SVG so you can zoom right in. The “tolower1” line shows relatively poor performance compared to “tolower64”, tho it is hard to see for strings less than 8 bytes.
What do you think they should add instead of another ALU?

The returns are diminishing, but a single digit bump is still a pretty good when your goal is faster single threads.

Adding nothing to save space is obviously not the answer, because that leads to having more slower cores.

Also the topic of the post, the 2-ahead branch predictor, exists specifically to get more ALUs running in parallel!

> apple silicon, where the focus is running super deep speculation

And to make that speculation profitable, the M1 cores have 6 ALUs among other wideness.
> What I heard is that CrowdStrike normally rate limits pushing a fix. This is so
that if the fix is bad, the damage is limited. But for some reason, the rate
limiter was turned off and the update went out to everyone.

Is this true though? They've released a Post Incident article:

https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/falcon-content-update-preli...

in which they state:

> How Do We Prevent This From Happening Again? Implement a staggered
deployment strategy for Rapid Response Content in which updates are
gradually deployed to larger portions of the sensor base, starting with
a canary deployment.

So it seems, if I understand this correctly, they've just implemented
the rate limiter as a response to this incident.
Children should be allowed to get bored (2013)
How would this change what I've said and you've said? Instead of providing real stats you just throw random affirmations and expect people to believe them
Agrred.Android Studio Takes too much time to start
I tried that approach with a colleague and it just got more and more heated and frustrating. At the same time we were getting heat for reliability. I ended up quitting. Since then I heard from a colleague that they made some staff redundant, on a team that was already underwater.

I doubt very much that my experience was unique. In my new position we have the same problems with reliability but I don’t get involved in the political side of trying to argue about it, just turn up and do my 9-5. I’m a lot less stressed now!
> The right to own property doesn't mean you have the right to own all forms of property

Maybe?

If you want a specific form of property, and you have the means to acquire it, lots of people would probably think that you should be let owning what you want.

Of course "means to acquire" encompasses a lot of situations in which ultimately a person has more power than others: you might have more money than your peers bidding for this property, or it might be an "adverse possession" kind of situation, or anyhow ultimately you get the state/law/authorities to agree with you, which means that you can benefit from the state's monopoly on violence...
I recall once having an SD card with a mysterious file in the root folder with system and hidden attributes on it. I decided to delete the file and some time later (months), the card suddenly stopped working.

It maybe stopped working once the OS decided the bytes were available for use (which it would only have done without the file marking that space as unavailable) and overwrote that section. I suspect defragmenting or otherwise moving the file about for whatever reason would have had the same effect.
> Just to be clear within the analogy: are you expecting the auto manufacturers to "force-eject" any hotel on Park Ave that has a record of valet mishaps? Or did you mean individual cars should force-eject the valet?

Not OP, but I think the analogy here is the hotel "fore-ejecting" (firing) the valet with a history of doing joy rides. That seems very reasonable.
You update your submodules every day?

Also, the discussions are there because it's been more than a decade and the options have evolved over time.

Submodules are a bit clunky but the problem it solves is itself clunky. Bringing in another tool doesn't really feel like its going to reduce the burden.

I have yet to be in a situation where I blindly want to update all submodules. It is a conscious action, X has updated and I want to bring that change(s) in.

cd submodule, update, test, commit.

I haven't seen anything in this thread that really motivates me to learn another bespoke tool just for this. I'm sure it varies for different projects though.

Fast forward 15 years and see how the tooling this thread has been evolved and how many different tools people will have used and compare that to the stackoverflow post. I'm more inclined to invest time in git itself.
Checked your site. It is pretty cool. What AI models are you working with to find answers in real time? And what's the frequency of re-running these searches for updating the answers? Are you doing it once daily, weekly or monthly?
You use a distribution made with foot for secretary and gamers and you blindly try to explain where the problem is.

You are the clown's of the world, that's all ... xD
I wish I had the same experience. All my memories of the Italian highways are from being stuck for hours on the Salerno-Reggio on what at the time looked like thousands kms of unpaved and closed roads.
Well, you can use https://github.com/taviso/ctypes.sh.
Except Crowdstrike had 3 separate Linux incidents, including kernel panics, directly before this happened.
I do think they're helpful, yes. The main idea is that they are fast and efficient to get the candidate list down. Meeting people gives much better signal, but takes more time and committment from both parties.

They can tell you who shouldn't be in the set with reasonable probability, but not who should be employed Sort of like a bloom filter ;)
Cool, just tried it on a few:

Llama3-8b-8192, Gemma2-9b-lt, Llama-3.1-70b-Versatile - All Said Yes

Llama-3.1-8b-Instant:

King Henry VIII had three children who survived to adulthood: Mary I (Mary Tudor, also known as Bloody Mary), Elizabeth I, and Edward VI.

Mary I had one child, a son named Edward VI, who became King of England at the age of 9 after Henry VIII's death. Edward VI died at the age of 15, so he did not have any children.

Elizabeth I never married and did not have any children.

Therefore, King Henry VIII did not have any grandchildren.

???!

Llama3-70b-8192: Also similar to above.

Of course if I ask again I may get a different answer!
My favorite terminal. Super easy to split screen either horizontally or vertically, which is the most important feature for me.
If someone spent their time learning their tools, they will make better choices when writing the code without any additional time cost.

There are two variants of very similar code. Both do the same thing, both are readable and maintainable. The difference is not primarily in performance, it's in quality of craft.
> suppose you have a std::vector<std::vector<int>> and you want to append a number to the end of the first vector, but you accidentally forget the subscript. ... if you write my_vec.emplace_back(2<<20), the code will compile, and you won’t notice any problems until run-time.

How is this not caught by the type system? 2<<20 is clearly no way, whatsoever, compatible with a vector<int> type.
The Embedded category is ridiculous. Raspberry Pi is hardware, PlatformIO is a development environment. Arduino could refer to either, and is irrelevant to professionals. Masses of stuff inbetween is omitted.

Only relevant to marketing departments.
For ligature aficionados, it does seem to support a handful of them. It took me a while to find. Navigate to Customize at https://commitmono.com/.
How is it better than the open-source CodePod IDE (https://codepod.io)?
tl;dr Blockchain isn't transforming this or any other industry (other than crime)
How does Haystack compare with CodePod (https://codepod.io)?
100x this. Garbage in = Garbage out.

In similar mindset, I've seen attempts to "fix" flaky test suites by retrying failing tests 5 times until they pass. What happens: You just set a new baseline of shit allowed. This allows even more noise to enter the system and you have to rerun them even more or need increasingly more advanced tools to filter out the noise.

Once the new baseline is anchored, you become dependent on the filter. Now every tool that interacts with the metrics need to be aware of the additional filter, there may be more than just the slack messages. Should your dashboard show the raw or the filtered metrics?

Devils advocate: consider an alert with 99/100 false positives. The LLM may be good at classifying it as noisy but will it do a better job than a human to react to the 1 true positive? Maybe, but at the same time it allows more such noise to accumulate in the system, in effect a net negative. It's better to remove such an alert instead. Even if the numbers were turned around in favor, that's a lot of complexity added.

The additional context this product provides may of course still be useful and i applaud the effort. This product space does have a lot of potential for growth and is a real pain for operators. Be careful with using it as a substitute for proper alert hygiene and culture.
No, it is the oil companies and that oil is permitted to be used.

When something is permitted, it becomes mandatory to somebody, and oil is used widely. Personally choosing to avoid products that used oil in their manufacturing would basically relegate you to having to farm your own food by hand. That is not feasible in a society with competition.