skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> TinEye searched over 69.1 billion images but didn't find any matches for your search image. That's probably because we have yet to crawl any pages where this image appears.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Looks interesting. But you should add a note that it is not available in Europe (or at least France) for Android
I blame the name "High Speed 2".

It was never about improving speed (at least not in any meaningful sense), it was about improving capacity.
Github also supports that if you reach out support directly
"It is a language that makes complexity painful, but which reveals that a surprising amount can be accomplished without introducing any." - https://blog.information-superhighway.net/what-the-hell-is-f...
You can't be serious about comparing the technological capabilities of the JVM and Node and objectively declare the latter as the winner.

Compilation times are also an absolute non-issue.

You don't compile for development. You do it for production (in the rare circumstances that you need it).
I wouldn’t use the Yubico HSM, because I think it misses a feature that would IMO add considerable value: an enforced CT-style log. If I were paying for a corporate root of trust, I would want very strong auditability. Set it up so that the HSM does not release a signature until presented with an SCT. Make it impossible for buggy or compromised host software to create bad certificates without being detected.

A hardware HSM is not magic or even especially complex. Java cards can do it (slowly). Yubikeys can do it. Other vendors’ devices can do it. Lots of microcontrollers can do it as long as you don’t need resistance to complex physical attack. A startup in this space should seriously consider building its own.
It maximizes _current_ worker welfare, not global worker welfare, don't confuse the two.
> The difference between:
> set(SOME_VARIABLE "SOME VALUE")
> and
> set(SOME_VARIABLE, "SOME VALUE");
> is purely grammatical. The underlying functionality is the same.

But in a build script you don't want to be doing either. You want SOME_VARIABLE = SOME VALUE, or at most "SOME VALUE". Grammar and syntax matter.

> Pnut shows that C is only a set of grammatical rules, and the source code in C doesn't necessary reflect the binary program, it's only a script for the C compiler.

The only thing worse than writing C is writing something that looks like C but doesn't follow the rules of C, where you have to use some other logic to understand what it actually does. Build tools that do that kind of thing have been tried and they have not turned out well.

> When I'm saying, CMake could be a C library, I'm not saying we should ditch CMake and everything it brings to the table and start writing build scripts in pure C. I'm saying we can use both C language and CMake functionality with very little, skin deep, adjustments.

"Skin deep" perhaps, but making your language uglier and weirder is still unpleasant (and CMake is unpleasant and weird enough as it is).

> The only thing that keeps us down is the perception of C as a low-level language for low-level applications.

No, the other thing is the perception of C as a crude, inexpressive language full of weird edge cases that requires dozens of lines to write even simple things, and that in turn comes from the reality of C as a crude, inexpressive language full of weird edge cases that requires dozens of lines to write even simple things.
Immanuel Kant: Toward Perpetual Peace (1795) [pdf]
If you put something random after the URL it seems to skip the browser checks: https://beta.maps.apple.com/bleh
I agree on calling the bluff. They should, what will the IOC/WADA do? Cancel it? Try to find another sucker with a short notice?
But SLC isn't a bad place for a winter Olympics, they hosted it before not long ago and some of the national team facilities are there using things built for the 2002 Olympics. Of course, many more people live there now.
Strong types without strong typing that is.
And half the time you can tell, because the article reads like it was put together by something that doesn't understand the complete picture.

IE, they've produced crap.
Do you realize that for the first N years of Nvidia, he probably made less than minimum wage, AND had immense responsibilities on his back to try to get the company to profitability? That's the risk.

He's getting a 30M paycheck today only because he built a trillion dollar company from nothing and sacrificed the job opportunities he could have had at other companies for three decades.
“hi” is one consonant sound away from “bye”, but nobody confuses the two words.
When the alternative is owning no chunk of any company? Yes, still orders of magnitude better.

Nothing prevents people from investing also in other companies if they feel like. Or are you implying they are "too dumb" to consider the possibility?

Shared ownership also protects employees from speculative decisions like mass layoffs made only to give more value to shareholders. It also prevents the alienation of working on something you don't own and gives a strong incentive for everyone to give their best.
Laying off 10% of the workforce because the company isn't growing fast enough and then giving the CEO a bigger bonus.
At the end of every trading day, news reporters confidently state the reason behind whatever stock rose or fell that day. They must be very wise as they don’t seem to interview anyone before making these proclamations.
that's your guess and what they tell investors.

my guess is sheer incompetency hidden by sales volume.

at some point they had the idea of translating the search to categories and showing alternatives. it got both unmaintained and other products teams added their own self interest on top of the algo and now you have the worst search on the planet which nobody have the political power to fix because it touches everyone revenue, even if for worse
an employee is not taking risk "investing in time" in a company, because they are paid wages for it.

If it were the case that employees need to put in capital into the business before being employees, then it would be a different story. In fact, those schemes exist - they're called MLM, or multi-level-marketing schemes, where you pay the company upfront to buy the product, and try to sell it at a profit (like herbalife), and try to recruit on behalf of the company!
Whoever takes that job is also potentially signing up for years of litigation against them personally. 2k/hr lawyers for years add up fast :)
Being good and working in your own self interest aren't mutually exclusive though. In fact most of good things are genuinely done out of complete self interest, and practically all good things on the corporate or bureaucratic level. There's always someone involved in the decision who directly benefits, luckily sometimes it's all/most of us too. Society gets better when the self interested goals of an individual are aligned best with the majority of people (e.g. why presidents are on average better than kings).

To give a very active example, Zuckerberg isn't throwing billions into making ML models and then giving them out for free out of some sense of cosmic right, he's doing so to eliminate competition and further Meta's goals of making more money. But since his actions align with what most of us want, i.e. open source models, it's all seen as a relatively good thing. There is no such thing as "objective good" in nature, there's just how actions influence the person doing the moralizing.

Every living being on earth is hardwired to do two things first and foremost: survive, and make sure its species survives. The ones that weren't are simply no longer around. Helping others is ultimately something you do out of self interest, since you benefit from it indirectly. It is absolutely the natural state of things.
Firefox only has a marginal market share, so I can understand it's not a high priority target platform.
True, but could the incentuve be structured around the individual employee’s coffee shop (which would mean divulging the i individual coffee shops financials? That could make each employee look better out for the profitability of their coffee shop.
Google's reverse image search (images.google.com, click the little camera) can perform better in many cases, though here it only finds the linked page
I was wondering about a similar, but different mechanism. There's a pool of shares that are effectively rented for free to employees, and part of their pay is the dividend they get. When you join, you get them for free (maybe there's some vesting schedule), when you leave they go away, not as a sale but just for free again.

Soo... It's not like you're always inflating your share base with options. Just part of what people are paid is basically same as shareholders.

This isn't some "align with shareholders" bullshit, rather I wonder if it somewhat decreased the myopic perspective of an employee. They get paid off of the success of the whole company, they have an interest in prudent cost management, and so on. They get to vote on issues affecting the whole firm, too - collectively maybe they are 5-10% or whatnot, not lots but enough that they have a voice.

Otherwise, there is a prevalent, and sadly reasonable perspective of extreme cynicism towards an employer. The employer always says how we're all in it together, teamwork etc. but really, every employee is best served by entirely optimizing only their own utility. But surely this can't be optimal at the society level.
Company profits is not always aligned with consumer interests, didn’t understand why you switched them.
Not everyone has that luxury
Having a dedicated "Email designer" mode where it takes into account all the limitations of email rendering would be amazing. For example, you can't use a flexbox which designers take for granted, so they end up creating things that result in monstrously complicated <table>s for emails.

How this would look/work in practice I truly have no idea, since you'd have to constrain them by removing some of those features, but then they don't really translate to regular markup/CSS 1:1 either.
> Banks and financial institutions are required to file Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) and Suspicious Transaction Report (STRs). Filing such a report doesn't stop a transaction from happening.

It kind of does though, because banks are also not allowed to do business with criminals, so if they suspect you of being engaged in criminal activity -- even if they have no real proof -- guess what they do.

Worse than that, they're prohibited from telling you about the SARs, so you have no way to dispute them if they're inaccurate. It's a Kafkaesque absurdity that should simply be abolished rather than attempting to polish the turd with AI pixie dust.

> The report suggests that banks think they could improve the usefulness of these reports and reduce the number of false positives, if they had more freedom to choose the criteria.

Which is bollocks, but the government keeps pressuring them to do something because the system doesn't work (because banks shouldn't be doing it to begin with), so they're proposing to invade everyone's privacy because they want to do it anyway and this is a convenient excuse.
Funnily enough the docs are wrong, the GitHub CLI allows changing a forks visibility https://stackoverflow.com/a/78094654/12846952
TLDR: Research says no

Some companies experience short-term improvements in price as their costs drop, but usually it has a longer-term impact on morale and productivity that takes longer to play out. Additionally, layoffs are typically performed on unhealthy companies (eg. not usually companies like Google and Meta that print cash and have huge margins), and unhealthy companies typically have other secular or structural issues beyond too-many-employees.
> biz 101

Don't make 8 generations of products that do not profit while simultaneously changing nothing other than their form factor.

> companies don't do businesses for that reason.

I didn't say they did. Perhaps you should slow down and use fewer insults while you craft your replies. In any case, if you are losing money and customers are happy, that's certainly different than losing money and customers are not happy. Would you not agree this is "sheer common knowledge" as well?

> and skirting my question.

The product is a full decade old. This does not seem to factor into your question or arguments at all. Perhaps it should?
How does this work in practice, though. It's easy to say what you're saying, or go slightly further and say "let's stop optimising for work and start optimising for everything to be free".

What's the actual plan?
Annex 2 of the 2022 "Pegasus and surveillance spyware" report for the EU parliament lists a number of software names.[1] By looking up the companies or countries who make them you can probably find out more.

For your convenience, I quote the Annex:

Among the various spyware and surveillance products that are on the market, the following are mentioned in publicly available reports: Pegasus by NSO group, Cobwebs Technologies, Cognyte, Black Cube, Blue Hawk CI, BellTroX, Cytrox107, Predator, Candiru, Reign / QuaDream, Paragon108; Dark Basin, Circles system, SS7 attack, Cobalt Strike, FinSpy, NetWire, P6 intercept, Galileo, PC 360, Karma, Epeius, StealthAgent, Crimson, Invisible Man, Unlimited Interception System, Skylock, Windshield, Phoreal, Soundbite, OceanLotus tester, Ocean Lotus encryptor, Ocean Lotus Cloudrunner, Ocean Lotus MAC, Komprogo. Among the companies mentioned : Cellebrite, FinFisher, Blue Coat, Hacking Team, CyberPoint, L3 Technologies, Verint and of course NSO Group.

[1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2022/7322...
Better still, optimize for social value provided. If taxes and regulation are right, companies that provide social value will make profits and their owners will get rich. The proposed changes would make that less likely to happen. If nothing else, (a) individual companies all optimizing their own workers' welfare does not add up to optimizing the welfare of all workers and (b) non-workers are left out of the equation.
Absolutely I know couple of US Americans with long expired visas still in Europe.
Would those companies be able to compete in a global market?
> Most people intuitively describe images from foreground to background or left to right

I've heard there are cultural biases to this ordering. Some cultures tend to describe the background or scene first. The example I read about identified Japan as an "outside in".

I've been encouraging my kid to use "outside in" or "context first" in their descriptions with me, mainly because they suck at giving context. I doubt I'd have known about it if I hadn't read that about Japan.

Would love to hear from a Japanese person on this.
Like others have pointed out, it seems to work fine in other browsers once you trick it into letting you in. General compatibility doesn't seem to be an issue. So, what is it that Firefox and Chrome on Linux (and only on Linux) don't support?

H.265 is what they don't support. I'm not an avid enough user to know where Apple Maps makes use of media, but the source code contains media player controls, so it must somewhere. Retrofitting compatibility by launch may be as simple as re-encoding the H.265 content. Not at all worth the effort for beta 1, but with an obvious path forward.
You should read the company blog post linked in the article.
What on earth do you consider the common thread between those two names?
Oh dear.

Not only are you wrong, I'm simply amazed you are unaware of Section 75. It's one the key advantages of using a credit card in Blighty.

https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/reclaim/section75-protect-...

EDIT: Not to mention, 'chargebacks' are at the the card companies discretion. Section 75 is enshrined in law, so they can't weasel out.
Java's type system was just very limited, gradual typing is a poor tradeoff most of the time. I used to think there were advantages to something like Python, but once I found Scala I never went back.
What the replies seem missing is that books are not just the thing Amazon started with but also subject to regulation around pricing in places like Germany, which Amazon sells in. The reason they seem to have good and consistent data on many books is that it's necessary in order to avoid violating laws and regulations.
TypeScript Execute (TSX)
&$!#%: Swear words and profanities from around the world
> fully employee-owned

There are more possibilities which open up, if we drop the 'fully' criterion, both for decision making power and share of the profits.

If employees had, say, a 30% share in board decisions (not share of profits), then the CEO would have to be more mindful of how their decisions affect employees, just like they have to constantly track the markets today. Or a more local version of this, where decisions/appointments in each unit of the company are partially handled by employees of that unit. Not enough for a badly performing group of employees to have a veto, but also not something ignorable by management.

Regarding share of profits, there were high tax regimes in Western countries in the 1950-70's. For instance, top bracket of income tax could sometimes reach 90% and corporate tax 50%. In effect, this is saying that the public has a non-voting share(sometimes even a majority share) of the profits of the company. Of course, a large organization like the government is itself often corrupt/inefficient and fails to represent the public, so the taxation could happen at a more local level.

'Market socialism' proposals sometimes involve public ownership of the stocks of privately run companies, but a high tax regime can have a lot of the same effect.
How so? There are thousands of Herr and Fräulein Hilbert in Germany. Apparently it's more frequent there than anywhere else.
Replay.io is discontinuing Replay Test Suites
To be fair if I were to be a scapegoat for Boeing there's no way I would do that for cheap.
> If the company is a money-making machine like Google, the employees will not be sad if the employee base is kept small and most stuff is outsourced to other (likewise worker-owned) companies that gets a slim margin above their cost.

Google does this already, even not being a co-op. They have a huge contractor army, and their core employees are handsomely rewarded with massive salaries.

> So I predict that this world will have a have very small, very profitable companies which have some secret sauce but hands off most of the work to big companies making much less money.

This is kinda what we see already, except everyone want to grow their kingdom, (and hire their friends and family) so it seems inevitable that the "Small profitable secret sauces" will still get diluted without strong control
Overoptimize on worker happiness -> underoptimize for profit -> company goes bust -> workers lose their jobs -> no worker happiness
https://www.google.com/search?q=minecraft (click the block that shows up)
You can write TypeScript types in JSDoc.
I love these hidden eastereggs.

Others I know:

- askew
- zeg rush (doesn't seem to work anymore)
- ...

Is there a list of all of them?
The fee is probably only for countries which want a visa from them, I guess Africans can travel visa free to Namibia. The western countries can pay 90 bucks.
> - The selloff was triggered by a middle-of-the-road earnings report from Alphabet Inc. late Tuesday that featured a bloated capital expense.

Nobody knows what triggered the selloff, it's a global market with millions of actors doing actions based on numerous sources of information. More than that we come off a peak of hitting SPY500 ~$600 and NASDAQ100 at $20.5k which are all time highs and it's very normal to retrace a bit after - but even that doesn't mean much.

Whenever someone tells you the reason for a stock market move, all they're telling you is what they believe did it, but they have no clue, other than specific critical situations as like, after 9/11 attacks. For company specific "this is why" it's much easier, but even then many times it does the opposite of what the analysts' previous explanation was. They just tell you something because they know people want a "reason".

They could've easily written "after historic rise and new all time highs, some investors take profit" and it'd also be correct.

It's like a bunch of guys looking at a CPU metric in grafana without SSH access to the server or knowing what it's running trying to figure out the cause. Sometimes it pins at 100% and some guy shouts "it's paging to disk", and yeah, might be, might also not.
Though I'd primarily see this as a feature for the REPL or manual scripts where I'm not going to mind doing a `nvm use X`.

For production use, I'd still put my TS files through a build pipeline as normal
There are glasses that, AFAIK, shift the wavelength of incoming light in some certain way such that a colorblind wearer can differentiate real-world colors that they'd normally have trouble telling apart.

It doesn't magically allow colors to show up that they're physically incapable of perceiving, but AIUI it shifts real-world colors that they'd have difficulty telling apart into other colors that they can tell apart, if that makes any sense.
Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia may be long term duds? Certainly there are some, but the article talks about the Nasdaq100. The odds of all of them sucking and being down in a year are pretty slim.
It's got that early-'00s digicam look to it. My pictures from the end of high school have a similar vibe, despite having no basketball.
Your savings don't need to be tied to the stock market, it's actually not the case for most people outside of the US afaik. Your retirement pension even more so. How we choose to redistribute the extra wealth generated by others is mostly political.
I'm an "Israeli" and I have no clue who it was.
Sourcehut :)
IIRC, they get Fridays off to work on exactly such things (or other things they want to do/try).
Seriously like rolling out on some exponential scale even over the course of 10 minutes would have stopped this dead in its tracks
CrowdStrike is more than big enough to have a real 2000’s-style QA team. There should be actual people with actual computers whose job is to break the software and write bug reports. Nothing is deployed without QA sign off, and no one is permitted to apply pressure to QA to sign off on anything. CI/CD is simply not sufficient for a product that can fail in a non-revertable way.

A good QA team could turn around a rapid response update with more than enough testing to catch screwups like this and even some rather more subtle ones in an hour or two.
those times have long been gone. Warranties were not the driving factor, but taxes and exchange rates.

Today, the price difference is negligible on most hardware (smaller than $50 on MSRP on an iPhone if you compare New York to Paris for example)
Both are "evil". (edit: I am not the poster you replied to)
This is about the whole market, not individual stocks.

This is Buffett’s point. When the market loses $1T in a day, it will definitely come back if you have a long term horizon.

Just like if you bought nasdaq after the 2000 crash.
1. How much of that is due to its inherent complexity, and how much is just due to its novelty? If they had grown up in a society where RCV was the default, how many of those people would still have been confused?

2. People misunderstand that FPTP requires tactical voting as well; are the number of people who will continue to misunderstand RCV if it were to become common higher than the number of people who currently misunderstand FPTP?

Consider that anyone who suggests you to vote third party to "end the two-party system", before the voting system has changed, fundamentally misunderstands how FPTP works as well.
There are union types for strings; and there are plain javascript objects (typed as const) if "namespace.name" syntax is desired. With these available, what is the point of enums?
If it's so easy, why aren't you doing it? Presumably it requires some amount of investment to break into, but with such a high upside it's still massively +EV.
Businesses do not set their share price, the market does.