skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hahaha you'd be surprised how much demand there is out there. Wix's market cap is $10b +/-
I think the more important thing is that some people build up confidence upfront by reading up on theory, and embarking on a problem next; and others want to try building things and only once they hit the wall, figure out the background. And there's all sorts of middle ground. And as we develop, we move left and right on that continuum (and it also depends on the topic).

So I don't even think what the article claims is universally true: I've seen people who simply get frustrated if you don't give them enough time to read up on a bunch of (to you) irrelevant documentation, and struggle to get anything done otherwise.

The real take away for me is that people learn and synthesise knowledge in a myriad of ways, and we should strive to figure out which person prefers which way, and failing that, offer all of these ways so we can observe and learn.
I felt the same way when watching the Trump Assn. attempt. The number of people in the stands who just remained standing and gawking with no self preservation instinct (duck!) was eerie.
What is the benefit to society of Nancy Pelosi buying NVDA?
Comment from this joker came up on one of my FOSS projects, was pretty funny and utterly baffling.

"anyway...dis you?"
This is a type of English usage that bristles my sensibilities when I read it (my sentence parser gives high level warnings, not errors); its most well known example is "Baa baa black sheep have you any wool?" The second part of this sentence may be rephrased as (among others):

* Do you have any wool?
* Have you got any wool?

Either of these I find totally fine, though I personally prefer the latter.

Anybody else shares this feeling? For further syntactic analysis of this type of archaic usage see https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctvxcrn29
No, we need to adapt an existing term into the new context that it is being deployed in.
I think it's great that you're fighting to maintain the term's fundamental meaning. I do, however, think that we need to give credit where credit is due to companies who take actions in the right direction to encourage more companies to do the same. If we blindly protest any positive-impact action by corporations for not being perfect, they'll get the hint and stop trying to appease the community entirely.
I think something to do with battery production for grid usage. Combine that capability with renewable energy subsidies and you might have a good next chapter for Tesla until others catch up.
I'll tell you a secret from a friend in Audi. They are doing as bad or worse.
>Wow, a full half of Tesla's operating income came from tax credits( around $800M of $1.6B operating income).

Totally logical for the CEO of the company to be vocal supporter of the man who wants to kill those credits.
Says nothing about that, and if there were exceptions it should, since it is official documentation from the source.

What you need to do is to change your adress to some place abroad, which you can do online here:

https://www.skatteverket.se/privat/folkbokforing/flyttanmala...

You have to understand that there is no huge outcry in Sweden about this, but rather a reasonable concensus.

Maybe if the war was on us or on our doorstep it would have been different.

1. We have had conscription for most of the 1900s, it is only the last 10 years that was an anomaly. Your father (me) will probably be able to tell stories about it.

2. With the scale proposed and with both men and women eligble, it means that it is effectively voluntary.

3. There are enough young people around 20 that would not know exactly what to do anyway, so this can be seen as a good option to get some experience.

4. 1-3 needs to happen anyway to get political acceptance for this.
> a bunch of people doing due diligence on an acquisition

Granted, it was nowhere near this scale, but I've gone through this process as the head of Engineering for the company being acquired. At that point, the business had already decided to acquire, so the process felt more about finding any red flags and/or identifying reasons to adjust the price.

For the process itself, the company looked at nearly everything over the course of a few months. Every detail of finances, sales, tech, operations, etc. was scrutinized, culminating with 16 hours (4 for business and 12 for tech/ops) over two days of standing in front of a room with 30 people.
Given Waze / Maps is only ever as good as the available data, I wonder if the author took a moment to report the closed roads and open highway. You can complain about maps not being all knowing, but did they do the minimum to help others? At this point it's a global social activity.

Maps changes are processed quite quickly got roads.
I've seen newspapers with txet sdrawkcab in them. Note that the last sentence has text in both directions.

I didn't need Unicode for that - nobody does.

Uni
! c
edo

Why is there no Unicode markup for that?
I've created a video where I explain the SOLID principles of programming using relatable analogies. This approach aims to make the concepts more understandable and engaging. I'd love to hear your feedback on whether this method is effective and if I should continue creating similar content.
imo this is a big part of why Elon is cozying up to Trump and the right. If the left wins, there will probably be tax incentives for EV manufacturers at large because that's just part of their platform. And if the right wins, then he has bribed them and will get preferential treatment. Given his companies are so dependent on government money, it does make sense as a strategy because it ensures continuity of those handouts in both cases.
I know you asked a slightly different question but I watched a video about Ukraine’s nukes and the reality is they could never deploy them without Russia. The codes always stayed with Moscow and Russia would have forcibly maintained a presence on Ukrainian soil to protect their nukes.

Ukraine returning the nukes was a pragmatic move that, at the time, removed Russian military presence from Ukrainian territory. Think about it another way: the USA maintains nuclear weapons on other country’s territory. They sure as hell staff those sites with US troops!
> On top of all that, the only practical way to have any hope of "winning" a nuclear exchange is to hit the other side so unexpectedly hard and fast that they can't mount a strong enough response to completely destroy you in return. There were multiple serious high level discussions about doing exactly that at various points during the Cold War by both sides.

to demonstrate this point you can find the end of the movie War Games on youtube. A rouge AI (heh) is determined to launch an ICBM and only when the computer is tasked to play itself in a game of nuclear war does it determine there is no possible way to win. The movie ends with the iconic robotic voiced line "strange game, the only winning move is not to play".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0N7TpqZI-E
You don't need anything to implement any policy. You just need someone with power to implement it. There's multiple ways of doing that. One way is to do so democratically, in which case you need to convince the population to vote for you. This can be done through religious means (I.e., appeals to a greater authority or set of morals) or -- ignoring metaphysical concerns -- evidentiary means (i.e., appeals to science and studies). The authors of this study are clearly trying to do the latter, because they want to convince you to vote for these policies.

The other way to implement it is to stage a coup, gain power by sheer force, and implement it that way.

In either case, you don't need an academic study.

> Money might not grow on trees, but it quite literally exists as 1's and 0's in some database.

Except money does grow on trees (and in supernovae and a few other places). Money is not a number in a database is a unit of net work owed by someone else to you. No work can be accomplished without sunlight and trees.

Money has to come from somewhere, because there's only so much work being done.

Highly recommend Debt: the first 5000 years by Graeber if you're confused.
It's not that. I was on a plane where a guy tried to break open the door to the outside mid flight and it takes a good 30-60 seconds for people to comprehend reality and make a decision. It's easy to judge from a screen but when an actual disaster hits, the brain does weird things
You think humans are only 99% reliable on a per-mile basis?! That would mean your average person crashes every ~100 miles, or about once every two days.

You can not just go around asserting comparative advantage when your baseline is so far off it is farcical.
> no, there is nothing that can be done to them.

I mean what can be? Either you fire every time a mistake is made or you let it slip. Though we could have a more complicated and efficient route and let it depend on the severity/reasonability of the mistake and frequency of them. But as far as I can tell, this is generally what is actually done.

> The result would be "playing it safe," and prosecutors would only seek the easy cases,

Though this is still kinda true but for other reasons. Quotas are a common contributor here. Even if there is no official quota in a LEO team there is often an implicit one. Where things like number of arrests, citations, and so on. Because we can't be completely subjective, right? Obviously the reliance on metrics (spectrum of: <are truth> - <are guides> - <lol, who cares>) varies from place to place but it would be naive to assume that these things don't play a role.

I guess I'm saying the world is complicated and you're kinda damned if you do and damned if you don't, so take Blackstone's ratio into account and maybe we should let things be a bit fuzzy because defuzzing usually only ends up making them even more fuzzy.
You don't have to quit your day job while starting a business. And a business can be started for nearly $0.
100% agree. Just a literal answer the the question.

I’d love to see track cycling get more standard equipment. As it is today, some nations pump a ton of money into aerodynamics and RR to substantial advantage. More so than the difference between a Cannondale or Specialized road bike. Or so it seems to me.
So is Erlang/Elixir colorless or do those function calls have color?
It also suggests the argument generalizes to symbols as non-compact sets.
Agreed! I used a familiar brand to quickly communicate the main idea to readers here, but potential clients need to be sold on the end result:

Secure remote access to internal applications

Security is a lemon market so vendor reputation and functional results are more important for winning clients than the implementation ever was.
Always a great question with this company. Becoming Panasonic's largest reseller in North America might not be the highest margin business.
I didn't understand the point of this article. The root causes of the failure chain was their CI/CD sucks and is risky. You first try a build on various machines and smoke test them. Then, you deploy to a smaller subset. You don't YOLO deploy to all billion machines on a Friday afternoon.
Lots of mammals do this too. I've walked up on a deer where it's so confused as to how you got close to it that it just stands there deciding what to do.
-7% Year-over-year profit from automotive sales...

Since learning more about Mr. Musk, registrations for his automobiles in California have fallen drastically: https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/teslas...
Right, they write rather cryptically "This is not related to null bytes contained within Channel File 291 or any other Channel File."

That's not quite the same as saying "This is not related to Channel File 291 containing all nul bytes."...

I don't have first to hand knowledge here, but rely on Dave Plummer's statement.

Regardless of zeroes or single files or not, the fact is that bad data in C-00000291.sys in combination with bad validition in the driver causes it to crash. Deleting C-00000291.sys causes the driver to stop crashing.

Anyway, my main point isn't really about this. It's about the big bang global roll out simultaneously to at least 8.5 million systems in one go that's irresponsible.

The driver architecture is the lesser evil here, although it's bad enough!
The alternative would be to strip out all the fonts, markup, semantics, directions, and normalization.

Unicode should simply be a character set.

And life would be much simpler.
Google once again proving why even people who have nothing to hide have reasons to use End to End encryption.

People laugh when I suggest iCloud but Apple isn’t pulling this shit and has mostly the same functionality a non-business user needs.
Yeah it was a kaizen ticket the group filed after the last sprint.
Rhymes with motor boating, there's also gonna be plenty of that, as usual :P
Agreed; as someone working on a GenAI app in a big tech company, the main lesson I've learned is the gigantic delta between the effort required to make a intriguing prototype and a true, production ready, scalable, customer-facing, useful app. The former takes a weekend or two, the ladder can take a year or two.
No the preferred way to make modifications is using the the training code. One may also input a snapshot weighs to start from, but the training code is definitely what you would modify to make a change.
Also the opportunity to run on user compute and on private data. That supports a slate of business models that are incompatible with the mainframe approach.

Including adtech models, which are predominantly cloud-based.
It is a combination of those factors along with what I call TV-Brain, a subconscious assumption that it’s not real, it’s just like when I see it in the rectangle.

Remember, most people in the western and especially American world, simply do not experience real world risks and dangers, everything is so sanitized and cleaned and protected and safe, that they simply do not connect reality with their own demise or even a risk to it. On a related note, it is alway why I believe there are so many and increasing numbers of injurious contacts with bisons, moose, elk, bears, etc in Yellowstone, because they think they’re cuddly animals that they saw in wildlife documentaries and know from cartoons and tv stories of the child that is friends with the talking bear, etc. most people are simply so detached from reality that they simply have no reference for what they are doing that is extremely dangerous to their continued state of being alive.
There is a way to bypass the AT&T Gateway using the following method (with hardware)

https://pon.wiki/guides/masquerade-as-the-att-inc-bgw320-500...
Curious, Have you backtested the trades?
-Thanks
Why do people hyper fixate on Nancy Pelosi's trades? She isn't even the senator that makes the most money off trading[0]. Seems like the person to follow around is Mark Green as Brian Higgins is no longer a congressman.

[0] https://newrepublic.com/post/177806/members-congress-made-st...
Sorry, this is a major misinterpretation, or at least a completely different one. I don't know how to put it in a more productive way; I think your comment is very confused. You don't need to run a random number generator "for a while" in order to build up a probability distribution.
> organizing direct strikes in Russian territory

Well. Ukraine just wants to shoot at the places where rockets and artillery are shooting at them. It happens that the Russians conveniently are doing so behind the border. They can shoot at you. But you can't shoot back.

I honestly don't understand how people can spin this up as that NATO wants to strike Russia with a straight face.
The letter “thorn” is still alive and well in Icelandic.

It's also (AIUI) pretty funny, in that it's the reason many people seem to think that the word “the” used to be pronounced as “ye”: The letter fell out of fashion at around the same time as printing became popular. So many printers didn't have types – you know, the little mirror-image single-letter lead stamps you compose the page you want to print out of; typesetting – for it. But since the capital “Thorn” apparently looks a bit like the capital Y, they used that in stead. That's where all the “Ye Olde Shoppe” come from: People never said “ye”; it was just a kludge attempt to spell “the”.
They still trying hard to hide the fact their future profits are rapidly converging to 0, or negative if the EV credits are removed.

All the future projects are basically smoke and mirrors.

Robotaxi ?

"Though timing of Robotaxi deployment depends on technological advancement and regulatory approval, we are working vigorously on this
opportunity given the outsized potential value. "

Sure thing. So how come that Tesla is the only one company trying to solve autonomous driving that didn't even ask for any regulatory approval yet ?

As a reminder, Musk said in 2017 that his Boring Company was doing DC to NY route (in 29 minutes) and got 'verbal govt approval' and was only waiting for full approval to proceed. We're exactly 7 years later and absolutely nothing has been done.

Tesla is an AI company now. Funny chart on page 8 - Tesla AI capacity stands at '45k H100 equivalent', while the company claims it's betting it's whole future on solving autonomous driving.
But xAI, which is also a Musk's company, apparently build a 100k cluster from scratch in no time (apparently using Tesla's H100...). Something doesn't add up here at all.

I'm truly fascinated by all of this.
> I have been sim swapped and can confidently say that SMS is not a valid form of 2FA.

Sounds like a money quote for the testimonials page!
Scientifc American deep dive into plutonium pit production in operation at a new facility at Los Alamos:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/behind-the-scenes...
Subscriptions Suck Pay Once, Collect Customer Feedback Forever
Because of underlying decisions about their respective approaches, it's not certain that Tesla will actually be able to achieve the same as Waymo. Specifically, Waymo does pre-mapping, and uses LIDAR, probably other things, that Tesla won't do, so with those two differences, it's not clear that the computing power is available for Tesla to achieve the same level of self driving as Waymo.
If you can’t share the dataset, under what twisted reality are you fine to share the derivative models based on those unsharable datasets?

In a better world, there would be no “I ran some algos on it and now it’s mine” defense.
Low volume halo products make good testbeds. Stainless steel, 48V, etherloop, steer-by-wire. Better to "learn things" on fat margins and low volume than to jump the gun on Model 2 and Robotaxi and "learn things" on thin margins and high volume.
If you look up some kind of network equipment in a large metro area on Craiglist, you will often find data center resellers or sometimes just offices and the like directly.

There’s not a clear way to determine if the entity you’re buying from is a data center, but if you’re buying a 5+ year old 10gbe PCIe card it’s very likely that it’s from a data center.
how much vram do you need for 4-bit llama 405?
Are bicyclists particularly bad when it comes to cheating?
It's not necessarily psychology, it could be an involuntary stress response called freezing behaviour. It's where you stop, become hyper alert and observant of your surroundings to make a conscious decision about how to act. It's basically the conscious alternative to fight or flight.
Surely this just moves the incentive from the sportsperson/team to the sponsor - who have significantly deeper financial resources to undermine WADA's testing regimes.

WADA's budget is something like $50m. The likes of Ineos & Red Bull have sports marketing budgets well into the billions.
Absolutely, I'm talking about recreation. These are light motors, which makes them cool.
Your comment would have been so much more effective without the last sentence.
> something to do with battery production for grid usage

Tesla isn't a top-ten battery producer [1]. The batteries it does use (and make) are optimised for EVs.

[1] https://cleantechnica.com/2024/01/19/top-10-battery-producer...
Case (b) is problematic anyway in the general case, since for timestamped signed data the revocation time is relevant, because signatures provably created before the revocation time remain valid, and at least for OCSP a published revocation time is not allowed to precede the publication of earlier “good” revocation data for the same certificate. (For CRL this constraint is merely recommended, not strictly mandated.) This means you can’t retroactively revoke certificates for times in the past, and hence your original validation procedure better be valid.

In the same context, revoking the intermediate CA is bad in case some issued certificates were valid for an initial period, because then clients are unable to obtain fresh revocation information about issued certificates that would indicate the respective time of revocation (because the intermediate CA has to remain valid in order to be able to validate the signature on the OCSP response or CRL).

This is mostly not a concern in the context of TLS validation, because that usually relates only to the present time, not to times in the past, but it is relevant for code signing or other electronic signature use cases.
A breakthrough in insect-eye-like cameras.
Reconstructing Training Data from Models Trained with Transfer Learning
Primary source: https://abc.xyz/assets/91/b3/3f9213d14ce3ae27e1038e01a0e0/20...
The complaint is not that Google is too efficient. It is that Google is achieving apparent improvements in efficiency by taking steps that improve the short-term metrics and have net negative long-term impact. So, OP is disputing the senior management claim that this cost base reengineering is legitimately "durable."
Be charitable and intellectually curious. What would "open" look like?

GNU says "The GNU GPL can be used for general data which is not software, as long as one can determine what the definition of “source code” refers to in the particular case. As it turns out, the DSL (see below) also requires that you determine what the “source code” is, using approximately the same definition that the GPL uses."

and offers these categories, for example:

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#NonFreeSof...

* Software Licenses

* * GPL-Compatible Free Software Licenses

\

* * GPL-Incompatible Free Software Licenses

\

* Licenses For Documentation

* * Free Documentation Licenses

\

* Licenses for Other Works

* * Licenses for Works of Practical Use besides Software and Documentation

* * Licenses for Fonts

* * Licenses for Works stating a Viewpoint (e.g., Opinion
or Testimony)

* * Licenses for Designs for Physical Objects
The most interesting thing about it is that it’s the type of task where you'd expect LLMs to do well, yet the best models only score around 30%, while top humans get 100%. Many other benchmarks are also getting close to saturation.
FWIW: if you have an iPhone, the routing on Apple Maps is fairly conservative. The only time I've ever had it generate routes with weird detours was to avoid heavy traffic or road closures; under other circumstances, its routes tend to be straightforward, sticking to major roads where possible.