skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You’re trying to prove a point with no point. Yes, anyone can build anything. There is always room for more contenders when there are existing incumbents. The sky is still blue, and the grass is still green.

But it would make no sense for Wiz to do that, as they don’t have any “secret sauce” as it comes to endpoint security. They haven’t solved the problems that took Crowdstrike down.

It is not in their wheelhouse. It would be a waste of money and time.

Could they? Sure. Should they? Definitely not. It’s a commoditized space at this point, unless they have some new ideas which, if they did, they’d have already begun discussing.

Carbon Black did well because it turned endpoint security on its head. Not because it was a “better AV”

My $.02
A transplant isn't any more a hat than having natural untransplanted hair is like wearing a hat. A hair piece could be argued to be something akin to a pricey hat, but a transplant is naturally growing hair that has simply been moved from a donor area.
Beyond 5 years - I never ran into major problems doing release upgrades.
GNU C Library (GLIBC) 2.40 Released
> They've made it quite clear that they want the war to continue until something in Russia breaks.

The war can end tomorrow. All that has to happen is for Russia to pack up and leave the territory of another sovereign country. It's really that simple.

If Russia gives up, the war ends. If Ukraine gives up, there is a genocide.
Where has Facebook linked that? I can't find anywhere that they actually published that.
In your view, are activities like cycling and snowboarding valid as Olympic sports? Neither could exist without a significant amount of creative engineering.
Well, I am not bald, but I surely can empathize with men (and there are bald women too) whose self-esteem suffered because of baldness.

Despite that, any product that cured baldness would command a sizable market and probably help to subsidize other lines of business not so promising while paying for itself.
Protobufs are also a fun place to look for how much debate people will get into regarding required versus optional fields. Your post is taking an implicit "everything is optional" view. But, it does allow you to be stricter.

Common Lisp Object System also touched on all of these ideas years ago.
Let's Encrypt's goal has always been to support the vibrant community of websites, extending TLS to the long tail.

The handful of streaming and social media sites can always go to a big commercial CA and spend a few hundred bucks a year on certs that do whatever they need.
lol @ that guy LARPing as a Google employee. Reminds me of the Microsoft Answers forum.
I have the 70b model running quantized just fine on an M1 Max laptop with 64GiB unified RAM. Performance is fine and so far some Q&A tests are impressive.

This is good enough for a lot of use cases... on a laptop. An expensive laptop, but hardware only gets better and cheaper over time.
> specifically, it puts restrictions on commercial use for some users (paragraph 2) and also restricts the use of the model and software for certain purposes (the Acceptable Use Policy)

It's "a Google and Apple can't use this model in production" clause that frankly we can all be relatively okay with.
No it’s not the same as releasing a binary, feels like we can’t get out of the pedantics. I can in theory modify a binary to do whatever I want. In practice it is intractably hard to make any significant modification to a binary, and even if you could, you would then not be legally allowed to e.g. redistribute.

Here, modifying that model is not harder that doing regular ML, and I can redistribute.

Meta doesn’t have access to some magic higher level abstraction for that model that would make working with it easier that they did not release.

The sources in ML are the architecture the training and inference code and a paper describing the training procedure. It’s all there.
Use encrypted notes over git or not encrypted notes on always encrypted devices - if you want to use FOSS. Proprietary software never gives safety despite any audits.
Phish-Friendly Domain Registry ".top" Put on Notice
I had about 1000 connections and found my linkedin homepage completely useless as it wasn't showing me anything about the people I care about (mostly uni friends, colleagues).

I went through and whittled the list down to about 150 people I would either consider a friend or.close colleague.

My homepage is still useless as linkedin shows me random trending posts, so that effort was a complete waste of time.

It hadn't occured to me that recruiters would see less than n connections as a negative trait. I'd expect the opposite, someone with 1k connections (e.g) seems like someone who connects regardless.
Ah right, forgot about that one, thought you were referring to some issue with the Insight lander.
The model is public, so you can at least verify their benchmark claims.
“Fresh” is the key word. You need to have fresh ideas, and I am certain Wiz doesn’t, as it relates to endpoint security.

I agree Crowdstrike sucks. I’ve been beating that drum for the better part of a decade.

Building a “new crowdstrike” by a different name won’t win.
That event is perfectly illustrative of my point.

You can't even see out of a submarine but still the commander, executive officer, and chief of the boat of that submarine were fired because no matter what technology or capabilities exist it is the responsibility of the person in control of the machine to control the machine.
IMO the biggest role of the jury is to blackball the state's conveyer belt to imprisonment on a case-by-case basis. It really needs to become harder than it is for the state to put someone in a concrete and iron box.
Antidepressants affect how the brain processes internal sensations, study finds
Wow, imagine doing that for free.
A big part (possibly the primary reason) is to promote and sell overpriced gear to amateurs. The Little 500 race is run with all riders using standard bikes, so it's not unprecedented. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_500
I dont think that UBI could or would ever be implemented in a tax neutral way, so that is a pretty huge difference right there.

>I'm not really sure how to answer the retirement question because under this system I can't "just retire" because my lifestyle wouldn't permit it.

another way to frame this is how much (if any) of your income would you be willing to give up if it meant 0 work hours. Would you take a 10k pay cut? 50k? or are you completely inflexible when it comes to lifestyle spending, or alternatively, do you like your job enough that you would do it for free.
Between two distrusting parties, a third mediating party is needed. But that party does not need to be centralized. Indeed, there are many TLS certificate registrars.
I think inviting the person to play is much more engaging than just showing them you playing.

Showing the music notation to the student = tell

Playing the music to the student = show

Letting the student play the music = engage

Makes sense to me
Which option would be better?

A) Release the data, and if it ends up causing a privacy scandal, at least you can actually call it open this time.

B) Neuter the dataset, and the model

All I ever see in these threads is a lot of whining and no viable alternative solutions (I’m fine with the idea of it being a hard problem, but when I see this attitude from “researchers” it makes me less optimistic about the future)

> and the credulity that otherwise smart people have been exhibiting in this space has been baffling to me

Remove the “otherwise” and you’re halfway to understanding your error.
> Figure about 10-15% of people are innocent in criminal cases

Much higher than that in these particular cases, as noted in an article linked in OP:

> A recent white paper by a non-partisan organisation of prominent Chinese Americans in business, government, academia and the arts, examined information on nearly 300 defendants charged under the US Economic Espionage Act (EEA) between 1996 and 2020 [...] found that 27% of presumed Asian American citizens charged under the EEA were not convicted of any crimes. In total, the analysis showed that one in three Asian Americans alleged to have committed espionage may have been falsely accused.

And I don't think the feds have had a better record 2020-present.
Is the graph showing that only China and South Korea are actively growing their rail networks? It kinda looks like that. Also apparently Istanbul has a train under the Bosporus.
There are "strange" properties your users have... who are those people?

* You describe them as wanting to deploy the database in container: why would anyone do that (unless for throwaway testing or such)?

* The certificate issue seems also very specific to the case when something needs to go over public Internet to some anonymous users... Most database deployments I've seen in my life fall into one of these categories: database server for a Web server, which talk in a private local network, or database backing some kind of management application, where, again the communication between the management application and the database happen without looping in the public Internet.

* Unwilling to wait 10 minutes to deploy a database. Just how often do they need new databases? Btw. I'm not sure any of the public clouds have any ETAs on VM creation, but from my practice, Azure can easily take more than 10 minutes to bring up a VM. With some flavors it can take a very long time.

The only profile I can think of is the kind of user who doesn't care about what they store in the database, in the sense that they are going to do some quick work and throw the data away (eg. testing, or maybe BI on a slice of data). But then why would these people need HA or backups, let alone version updates?
The "Eddie Murphy" Rule
Yes and yes, but conditional compactness is different, and Cauchy sequences are not always convergent. That's why I mentioned completeness.
full scale nuclear war where the full quantity of warheads is used would be over in maybe 1hr tops. Initial attack, detection, response. Then probably another attack and another response from remaining SLICBMs and then that would be it. I don't think any capacity to create more would survive or change the outcome and therefore is not much of a deterrent.
I don't hate it, I just don't care about it. I'm in a field where I get jobs by what I've done, not how many work-friends I have on a website. I wish I didn't have to play the LI game but for some reason business execs think that connections number means something, so I have to play the game a little.

> A few days later my inbox will be flooded with recruiters spamming me with random useless stuff. Like this or that great Java opportunity (I haven't worked with Java in 15 years)

Ditto, except I'm not even a programmer and never have been but I still get a flood of Java programming offers. I actually get so many I have "java developer" as a filtered phrase in my email. I get 50+ a month, every month, for a decade now.

And really that's what most people get on LI, oodles of connection or sales spam, and irrelevant communications from people casting nets rather than actually being good recruiters and finding good people. That's why most people "hate" it, it's junk mail we actually have to interact with sometimes. I spend maybe 2 minutes a month there, and wish I didn't have to at all.
Thankful for incidents: embracing chaos to find clarity
Your choice of non-local provider for the express purpose of preventing physical access to justify evading a potential subpoeana can and will be held against you.

And that has been the law for over a century. Technology isn't some sort of magical wand that changes how the law works.
> Meaning the total wealth decreases for every hand played in a raked game. Economic transactions and increasing efficiency are positive sum.

I get the sense that you are dismissing the value of entertainment in this exchange.

Many of the donators in a given player pool know that they are losers and have a rough budget of what they are willing to lose. They engage in the exchange because they value the entertainment.

I personally see poker games as a transfer of wealth from worse players to better players, with the house taking a cut for creating the market. At higher stakes where most solid pros play, this rake is a small percentage of the wealth transfer.

Note that for many of the losing players, substitute activities for poker are gambling in the pit and/or sports betting. Are these also not part of the economy? What about movies, concerts, and TV? There is value in creating experiences instead of creating things, and poker is an experience that some people like.

To be fair, one of the things that poker is good at is letting people believe they are winners when they are not — this facilitation self-delusion sometimes makes for a bad look. That said, the bank account doesn’t lie, and I’ve seen plenty of avid poker players quit or drop stakes dramatically while choosing a different hobby or form of entertainment.
The Higgs Boson Might Not Be the Portal to New Physics After All
Great until you play a minimal game with somebody who grew up on awk, perl, etc
Do you have sources for that?

Some quick searching yields this:

"Based on the numbers, Tadej Pogačar has an FTP close to 7w/kg. These are the highest numbers that we’ve ever seen in professional cycling, and what’s even more incredible is that Pogačar is pushing 7w/kg for 40 minutes after four hours of racing."

https://velo.outsideonline.com/road/road-racing/tour-de-fran...
That sounds fantastic. If they make the Meta headset easy to wear and somewhat fashionable (closer to eyeglass than to a motorcycle helmet), I'd take it everywhere and record everything. Give me a retrospective search and conferences/meetings will be so much easier (I am terrible with names).
Google is presumably unable to determine that you paid for the right to copy this music file. Hence its "may".
Thanks for this feedback. I'll make sure to support multiple active keys as well.
Just have to check these days, can't be sure.

If you are a real human and not paid by Russia, I really shouldn't have to explain this.

You are not voting just for the president. You are voting for things like Supreme Court, that party legislation not being vetoed, as well as people who staff agencies.

At this point and time, the critical issue is the Supreme Court ruling of making a president a dictator. You have 2 parties - one party orchestrated this ruling through staffing cronies into the Supreme Court, with candidate representing extremist right wing views by Project 2025, which wants to use violence to subjugate people without giving a fuck about Constitution. The other party knows that it cannot use unlimited power to not lose trust of the people, and is actively working to negate that ruling.

Without even touching policies (where again, Republicans lose out massively in both effectiveness and results), your vote is not for a person, your vote is for sanity vs insanity.

None of this is up for debate. Everyone who doesn't vote or votes Republican in this election is supporting having US ran by a dictator.

After this election, if we have actual sanity in place with due legal process that both sides respect, then we can talk about who to vote for.
I wonder what people 80 years into the future will write about the ongoing destruction of Gaza.
It's cancerous how important "building an audience" and "engagement" has become to chronically-online people, and how it's seeping into meatspace, even into job applications.

I hereby swear to never set out to "build a personal brand" in my life. Total toxic waste. I wish humanity could get over itself.
When Canada was on fire last year, we had smoke all down the east coast. I don't know if it affected the temperature, but it sure affected the environment. it doesn't need to go full ashen-winter to fuck up plant growth cycles for farms and whatnot, I'm sure.
Hydrothermal explosion at Yellowstone National Park
Working great in ollama: https://mastodon.social/@rcarmo/112837520236956526
I want hardware attestation to be first-class, and not an afterthought. Since I'm integrating everything I can support a top-notch "lost key recovery" flow, whatever the requirements are.
Let's hope they learn to grow up before that.
> 2. backwards running text (hey, why not add spiral running text?)

Unicode encodes code points in logical order rather than visual order: the order in which text is supposed to be collated and spoken rather than the visual order.

One tricky issue is when both directions exist in the same text. Unicode can encode nesting of text in one direction within another. For example, text consisting of an English word and a Hebrew word can be encoded as either the English embedded in Hebrew or the Hebrew embedded in English: both would render the same but collate differently.

Is there a better way?
Doing something right vs doing something that seems right but has a hidden self interest that is harmful in the long run can be vastly different things. Often this kind of strategy will allow people to let their guard down, and those same people will get steamrolled down the road, left wondering where it all went wrong. Get smarter.
Or even better:

let span = Span::days(5).hours(8).minutes(1);
What’s the status on the Boring company? That seemed promising. But I recognize that, in America, the issue is not a lack of technology but rather the political will.
Personally, I prefer trams. You can see the buildings and the stops are typically closer to your destination.
There are a few numbers floating around, $1.2B being the lowest estimate.

HSBC estimates the training cost for GPT-5 between $1.7B and $2.5B.

Vlad Bastion Research estimates $1.25B - 2.25B.

Some people on HN estimate $10B:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39860293
GPT-4o Mini Fine-tuning
but it means your company cant be acquired by those giants, if you use this model.
I have no idea about topology, so sorry if my question is stupid: Assume we are limited to the unit square (0<=x<=1 and 0<=y<=1). Now I map every real number in [0,1] to a symbol by simply defining the symbol for the number r as x=r and y=r. This results in a uncountable infinite amount of symbols. Now it's clearly not true that it's possible to describe any of those new symbols with a finite amount of symbols from a finite alphabet (because otherwise this would also be possible for real numbers). Where is my intuition wrong?
Policy can change, retrospectively even
> promoting bike brands and riding bikes provided by their sponsors

Therein lies an answer - change the disincentives - instead of banning cheating riders, ban all of the sponsors of those riders for a time. Now the onus is on the sponsors to discourage cheating.
"Because all of the included participants were from infertile couples, this appears to be a limitation of the study..."

Pretty big limitation, and their discussion really is just there to justify publishing anyway. Both groups, bald and shaggy, may as well have been shooting blanks.
They calculate hashes for files and probably compare them to already reported ones
Yep, you're better off working for a US-based company with a presence in Canada.

The non-FAANG big and mid names offer dramatically higher comp than Shopify, and it's pretty sad.
It's adjusting for population, which skews the data too much.
https://archive.ph/pEW2S
This is absurd. We have crossed the point of no return, llms will forever be in our lives in one form or another, just like internet, especially with the release of these open model weights. There is no bubble, only way forward is better, efficient llms, everywhere.
Incels with kids? Get your narrative straight before you blow a gasket.
EDIT: in Norway
I'd recommend a combination of data structures.

1st - Put all the actual data in a sorted / linked list. Keep this updated as you always have

2nd - As a separate thread, Keep an ordered set of lists, each list matching a time in the past, present, future, with increasing increments as you move from the present. Each of those lists can be all the items available at that time. The past is for reporting on old events, etc.

-365 days
-180 days
-90 days
-45 days
-30 days
-29 days...
-1 day
-23 hours... -1 hour

NOW

+1 hour... +23 hours
+1 day... +30 days
+45, 90, 180, 365 days

In each of those lists, have pointers to all the relevant records in the main list.

If there's a pointer error, scan the whole list, the slow but reliable way.
A more recent case involved an attempted prosecution of an MIT professor. Going off journalistic reporting [0], the whole case was baseless—built on an incorrect understanding of key facts—and involved prosecutorial misconduct (illegal withholding of possibly exculpatory evidence).

[0] https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/gang-chen-c...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gang_Chen_(engineer)#Federal_i...

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30082313 ("In the end, you're treated like a spy, says MIT scientist"; 446 comments)
Nvidia GeForce RTX 50-Series Blackwell to Launch in January 2025 at CES
It is helpful to remember that America is the world’s largest petrostate.
May I ask how you came to believe you are female?

Most transwomen make the distinction between the reality of their sex (male) and what they perceive to be their gender (woman), so I'm curious as to why you've decided to call yourself female.
The boring company was a play to ensure California doesn't bother with its owned rapid transit systems. Much like hyperloop.
Your quote is also: "Capitalization matters a tremendous amount". But at least in some positions capitalization is mandated by grammar rules. So, when a noun should appear in such a position (e.g., just after a full stop), how does one distinguish between its two forms (capitalized and not capitalized)? There should be a way, if that "matters a tremendous amount".
Fortunately quite many, maybe cause my sector is highly demanded, but having 1k,2k or whatever number of connections is not a metric for a lookable candidate. Years of experience, your github projects, open-source contribs are valuable metrics IMHO.

Maybe recruiters after all also look a the connection number, could be, but its like saying a photographer is better than other cause he just simply posts more pictures.
I wouldn't say it's lack of political will. It's more that we are so excessively bureaucratized and regulated that it just takes more political will to get the same thing done because it will be stuck for years getting regulatory approval.
I diff'd the chrome extension against the github repo and they are basically the same, outside of a few lines in the README.md missing and the manifest.json containing an update URL key to "https://clients2.google.com/service/update2/crx".
time to start changing the hash by adding a few bytes to your movies before uploading to Google Drive

head -c 20 /dev/urandom >> movie.mp4

won't affect playback, will affect Google finding your pirated films.
> If you connections number is over 500, that's a plus, under 500 and it's a bad thing.

How is this supposed to be correlated with employee quality? I doubt there's a positive correlation
The Boring Company has dug exactly one 1.7 mile tunnel in it's entire existence. It's not a serious player in the space.
I'm perfectly happy with them draining the life essence out of the people crazy enough to still use Facebook, if they're funneling the profits into advancing human progress with AI. It's an Alfred Nobel kind of thing to do.
How does it compare to a half-silvered mirror used for

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepper%27s_ghost

?

One of my stretch goals is to do a sketch comedy performance with a video game character and part of that is figuring out how to stretch out a mirrored film big enough for a humanoid character to reflect an image from a projector or big ass TV. With Pepper's Ghost the mirror is at a 45 degree angle but that thing seems to work with the surface perpendicular to the floor.