skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There are some people with T2D—a minority of them—who are not overweight. I think T2D with overweight or obesity should be called something else.
“Publishing” in academia usually refers to being accepted in a “peer-reviewed” journal or conference. So your paper is not just uploaded somewhere – it is sent to 2-3 domain experts, who criticize your work and force you to jump through lots hoops before it’s either “accepted for publication” or “rejected”.

When this works well, it’s a good filter to prevent spam, fraud, methodological errors, etc. from being published, while improving the quality of the accepted research papers via feedback from other domain experts.

When it doesn’t work well, the referees can take it upon themselves to reject papers for subjective reasons, including that the work is “not novel enough”, that they don’t like the model you used, or that they are just not excited by the research field you work in. It also happens that they require you extend your work in a way that takes an order of magnitude more time before they’ll accept it. For the authors, it’s often difficult to defend themselves from this kind of attacks, since the referees in many journals don’t need to justify their claims much, and often feel free to be extra harsh since they tend to be anonymous.

Since going through the publication process can take months to years of work depending on your field, some researchers would not be willing to put in that effort for a negative result (which is unlikely to be cited and thus doesn’t help your career).

It is however possible to just upload a paper (e.g. to arXiv). These “manuscripts” are often useful and can be cited normally, but researchers tend to be a bit more wary of citing them unless the authors are well-respected due to the lack of peer review.
How do you create a job if you don't have a job?
Real-Time Clock Alarm
Colin Kaepernick Launches New AI Startup
Automatically translating posts for MultilingualPress (on a WordPress multisite)
I use Berry browser and configure it to scroll on volume buttons. You can configure closing pages in plenty of ways too
> This is not an evidence of scientific fraud...

In its scriptures/philosophy, science describes extremely thorough and sound principles and guidelines...but in on the ground practice (by scientists, which are a part of "science"), they are often not achieved[1]. However, this distinction is not only not advertised broadly and without aversion, it is usually (in my experience) not mentioned at all, if not outright denied using persuasive rhetorical language (like, for example, when an object level instance of not achieving it is pointed to in the wild, such as in forum conversations). This may not be fraud (that requires intent I think?), but it achieves the same end: misinforming people.

I absolutely agree with your database idea, and if science would like me to take them seriously (something near how seriously they take themselves) they'd also have to go much further.

[1] Not unlike in religion, a competing metaphysical framework (model of reality) to science.
I propose changing "intelligent" to "questioning" (curious) and "stupid" to "unquestioning" (noncurious). And perhaps "lazy" to "resource conserving/saving" and "energetic" to "resource utilizing/spending".
I wish we would disentangle publication from endorsement. Making the bits available and saying that they're useful are different things. Your null result could contain data which is relevant to some other inquiry.

All results should be published, some should be celebrated.
Just to be clear, do you believe milk.com is being squatted on right now? Should its registrant morally pay more than the default annual registration cost?

If so: How does consistently using a domain (any domain) for literally 30 years (as of a week ago) for a personal website and an email address constitute "squatting?"

Please note that there is a significant time cost (both senses) switching one's email address. Speaking personally, I have found some organizations are effectively incapable of updating an email address in their systems, at least not on the first N attempts over the course of M years.
> This unnecessarily trivializes the technical problems at hand.

Making a language that automatically generates two versions of a function, one that is async and returns a Promise-wrapped object, and another that is sync, is not hard.

> This is exactly what JavaScript did.

No, it isn't. JavaScript requires you to declare functions as async at the function definition, and you can't call async functions from sync ones. This is exactly the thing I am arguing against, and is the opposite of "The right place is the call site."
The terms used to describe the modern technology are derived from early neuroscience going back to the late 19th century. Our understanding of how biological neural networks operate lead to this conclusion. Not the other way around.
async/await may have originated as keywords in C#, I don't know, but the programming style itself is ancient. Almost every GUI ever written is programmed in the style. Network servers were written this way back when threads were just a fever dream of academics yet. The entire Mac OS ecosystem prior to OSX had to be written in this style because time was cooperatively shared across the entire OS.

This is one of the most blatent "failure to learn from our history" debates I know of, when people act as if the question started with Javascript just a few years ago, when in fact the programming community has experience with this style that predates when most of us were born. I'm getting to old fogey myself and it still predates my 1978 birthdate. I was never even tempted to get into Node because I'd already made an async/await-style mess in Perl before Node was even released, and the mess had everything to do with the programming style and little to do with Perl qua Perl, and the libraries I used were already old and well-established then, if not outright long in the tooth. There is nothing new about this, except keywords.
border-block (and border-inline) are new ones for me!

Also it might be worth mentioning position sticky on table rows/sections don't work yet in Firefox unfortunately :( but hopefully soon...
This also becomes a security issue at some point. If these updates can go in untested, what's to stop a rogue employee from deliberately pushing a malicious update?

I know insider threats are very hard to protect against in general but these companies must be the most juicy target for state actors. Imagine what you could do with kernel space code in emergency services, transport infrastructure and banks.
Are cloudflare, azure, and AWS not tech companies?
Lots of words about improving testing of the Rapid Response Content, very little about "the sensor client should not ever count on the Rapid Response Content being well-formed to avoid crashes".

> Enhance existing error handling in the Content Interpreter.

That's it.

Also, it sounds like they might have separate "validation" code, based on this; why is "deploy it in a realistic test fleet" not part of validation? I notice they haven't yet explained anything about what the Content Validator does to validate the content.

> Add additional validation checks to the Content Validator for Rapid Response Content. A new check is in process to guard against this type of problematic content from being deployed in the future.

Could it say any less? I hope the new check is a test fleet.

But let's go back to, "the sensor client should not ever count on the Rapid Response Content being well-formed to avoid crashes".
The definition for RAG that works for me is that you perform some form of "retrieval" (could be full-text search, could be vector search, could be some combination of the two or even another technique like a regular expression search) and you then include the results of that retrieval in the context.

I think it's a useful term.
I may be coming around to the always 200 status code. Anytime you start returning non-200s, "intelligent" things in front of your code (load balancers, WAFs, browsers) start doing unpredictable things that are a massive pain in the ass to debug. It also makes JavaScript fetch calls easier as your catch block will most likely be a hard down scenario.
Earnest AI
Once you've read everything, what's left? Start reading some again and see if it improves your understanding?
The Chrome Extension is open source and is powered by DuckDB WASM which loads the parquet conversion of the datasets as views so you can query them with SQL.

Here's the repo: https://github.com/cfahlgren1/hf-data-explorer
I would say it was easy enough for traditional UNIX admins.

We used it for our HP-UX customers in telecoms, using our CRM software stack, based on Apache/Tcl/C.
I think most AI companies are going to prefer government funding over a simple commitment to not hinder their development.

Because capitalism.
1938–Water Works, the Eighth Wonder of the World
Yeah, that's the correct solution. I'm not arguing for the solution, I'm arguing for the problem, because a lot of people seem to think that the problem isn't real.
The problem I've not found one OCR solution to handle well is complex column based layouts in magazines. Perhaps one problem is that there are often images spanning anything from one to all columns, and so the text might flow in sometimes funny ways. But in this day and age, this must be possible to handle for the best AI-based tools?
That is such a great website! Amazing content throughout.
The end result of imposing a restrictive Code of Conduct onto their society.

Something that certain people could learn from in their futile attempts to control others, wouldn't you agree?
Great. Autonomy is where R&D dollars ought to be flowing.
It's ironic I have to say. The "sticky" CSS property should only be used for table headers. Yet it is never used anywhere for tables, but instead misused on almost every website for navigation and clutter.
Toyota Corolla to get PHEV variant with BYD hybrid tech for up to 2100 km range
What Impossible Meant to Feynman (2019)
I ask Alexa to remove things from my shopping list all the time. It always asks you to confirm, but then it does remove it. Sounds like maybe you're talking about the Amazon shopping cart, not the generic shopping list feature?
Direct link to the PIR, instead of the list of posts: https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/falcon-content-update-preli...
> very high genetic factor with 90% of identical twins both having T2DM

Or both not having it, I hope?
Taking the Pain Out of PHP Development with Docker Compose (2021)
i have my own cdn.
Nah, it's mostly residential houses heating with coal. In the winter the air quality is shit, in the summer it's pretty much the same as in the rest of EU.

Coal powerplants suck cause they produce a lot of CO2, but they don't polute much (because of mandatory filters). It's negligible compared to unfiltered coal heating in millions of homes.
Everywhere in the C# ecosystem. You’ll see things like x.Read() and x.ReadAsync().
Which protocol is more complex to implement: RabbitMQ (AMQP) or Apache Kafka?
We are considering offering our internally developed message queue service to external users (possibly as an open-source project). We are currently deciding whether to implement the RabbitMQ or Kafka protocol, aiming to integrate with the existing ecosystem more quickly. From our experience, Kafka seems easier to implement. However, Kafka has multiple versions and a variety of clients, which might introduce some challenges.

Our core requirements are:

- Protocol Extensibility: We may need to implement some custom features for internal use.

- Ease of Maintenance.
Ease of Development: We do not necessarily need to implement the entire protocol, just the core functionalities. We noticed that AWS’s Kafka services do not provide all features either.

- Ease of Integration with Existing Ecosystem: We are concerned about potential issues with Kafka, mainly due to frequent protocol changes. RabbitMQ, on the other hand, primarily uses AMQP 0-9-1.

Could you provide advice based on these requirements?
I'm on a project like this right now. All we needed was an API that exposes data from a database and the team in charge of that database is inventing their own query language with a series of microservices run by an orchestration framework, all to avoid having to make new endpoints when different data is needed. Zero documentation of course. Good job security and resume building all in one project!

Sometimes 10x engineers means 10x more complicated than it needs to be an 10x less intuitive than it should be. :)
A nasty problem I've seen with overflow:auto on a table inside a container is that Windows mouse users have to scroll to the bottom of the page in order to find the horizontal scrollbar and use it to scroll around the table. This is a bad UX, but I've not yet found a good solution for it.

(Trackpad users can use a gesture instead.)

The closest I've come to a solution is using JavaScript to try and mirror the bottom scrollbar at the top of the table as well, but it's pretty cludgy and hard to implement well.
Do not forget all amazing discoveries made by cycling's so called cheaters. Where would the Furies, Joshuas and, dare I say it, Usyks be today if it weren't for Armstrong's pioneering work on blood doping in the 90's?
Ask HN: What have you worked on this year?
Feel free to share milestones, challenges, personal growth, professional work, self-improvement, hobbies, progress, project logs, etc. Links encouraged :)
No, but this is also not really a novel solution.
> Whatever you do, don’t be tempted to change the table’s display property value to grid, just to make styling easier. You’ll break the baked-in accessibility that browsers provide for free, rendering your table inaccessible to users of assistive technologies.

Is this accurate? The accessibility for things like screen readers comes from the HTML tags, not CSS afaik.
> Also, a nitpick - you can call async functions from sync ones, you just can't access the return value.

Or wait for them to finish.
Which Country Should Design U.S. Industrial Policy?
Looks neat! I tried signing up but I was met with a sign in with Google or GitHub, both of which I am limiting my dependence on. Any chance you'll offer an option to make an account directly?
No, because in JavaScript/TypeScript you can happily await any function that you'd like on the chance that it sometimes returns a Promise. If a framework demands that you return a Promise unnecessarily, that's on the framework, not the language.
Sadly, Ballmer couldn’t reign in the Windows team before they effectively killed Windows Phone.

If I recall, the team had a large hand in hindering Windows Phone up until Windows 8; when everyone was too fed up to develop for the platform.
heh, thank you!

We actually got married on the 10th anniversary of our first date :)

We had known of each other online for a couple of years, but hadn't interacted much. She was going through a nasty divorce, so I offered some support. We'd known that we were somewhat alike just by being on the same site, so we had a baseline of common views to start from.
Hard to create and the results seem to get more and more unstable, making it very hard to do any science on them. However there is a theorized "island of stability", where superheavy elements might stick around for a bit longer:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_of_stability
Alright, shameless plug. I spend a ton of time trying to style this table of city data I had as nicely as I could. Getting CSS tables to not overflow in containers is a nightmare. I had to use a bit of Javascript to get the scroll shadows working using Intersection Observers.

I like HTML tables but getting them to do what you want can really be tricky.

Check out my table: https://caldwell.org/projects/data/city-index
Hmm, sounds like different goals. I don't work on that project any longer but it was a very small set of documents and they needed to be transcribed perfectly. Every typo in the original needed to be preserved.

That said, there's huge value in lossy transcription elsewhere, as long as you can account for the errors they introduce.
Peter Thiel seems to agree, https://enhanced.org/
Not to defend their cheating, but when you saying "I cheated" ends your career and the career of everyone involved with you, it's easy to see why they may dig in. It's not some game for them, this is their livelihood.
this is not for live streaming, hls/mpeg-dash makes no sense over faststarted mp4 container.

website is not ready to be public yet. but this year.
What’s the correct way to do sticky nav? Assume we’re skipping the arguments about whether sticky nav just shouldn’t exist.
The "(size_t)3 - (size_t)4" is defined to be the same as "-(size_t)1", which is defined, and the same as "(size_t)1 + ~(size_t)1". Also, "(ptrdiff_t)((size_t)3-(size_t)4)" is defined both before and after C++20:

If the destination type is signed, the value does not change if the source integer can be represented in the destination type. Otherwise the result is [implementation-defined (until C++20)] [the unique value of the destination type equal to the source value modulo 2^n where n is the number of bits used to represent the destination type (since C++20)] (note that this is different from signed integer arithmetic overflow, which is undefined).
You have to watch your definition of "blocking". Node, well, I won't say it created the definition of "blocking" that means "it blocks your entire OS process regardless of how many other things you're trying to do concurrently", but it certainly popularized it, and a lot of people sloppily project the negative aspects of that into threaded languages. In a threaded language, yes, you block on a .Read call until it is complete in that thread, but you don't block the whole OS process; other threads can and do continue on.
I have maintained a vendor neutral weekly newsletter about customer identity and access management (CIAM) on my own time (https://ciamweekly.substack.com/) and started a side hustle helping consultants with their newsletters.

Also built out a sales training program on a technical product for my day job and am so so close on a long form document about a currently undocumented section of the product. (Hopefully will ship it in the next few weeks.)
You misunderstand. The previous comment was about public defenders, not defence contractors.
It's all about stability. If you try and jam too many protons and neutrons together, they won't stay together for long. If the nucleus disintegrates before there's time for electrons to form and act like a chemical element, it's not really in the realm of chemistry any more.

"IUPAC defines an element to exist if its lifetime is longer than 10^−14 second, which is the time it takes for the atom to form an electron cloud.[7]"

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_of_stability

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superheavy_element

(Edit: this was intended in response to ssijak's question about the theoretical limits)
That's very fair. Indeed, my personal favorite version is Indian, and predates Pythagoras.

I was also trying to name something that most people would at least find familiar... maybe there's a different one, similarly universal, that would be more accurate?
> But these are luxuries and if you ask most doctors, you'll get back "you look great why would you do that?", aka, come back when you're sick.

Proactive tests are great! Except for the false positive challenge. If the test has a 99% accuracy and it detects a problem that presents in 0.1% (1 in 1000) of general population, do you have the issue? Should you do something about it?

Well it turns out you only have a 3% (my math is likely imperfect) chance of actually having the thing you tested for unless you also have other symptoms. Now what do you do about it? Unnecessary medical interventions kill people all the time.

Prostate cancer is a great example here. If you’re over 30 and male, you very likely have a little bit of detectable prostate cancer. But you’re fine just leaving it alone for another 30 years and there’s a huge likelihood it’s never going to become a problem at all. Getting it fixed would be way worse for you than leaving it alone. (1 in 8 men eventually gets diagnosed with this meaning way more actually have it)
Middle-class people on the PWCs and skiboats will do exactly the same thing to that pod of dolphins. The desire for speed and noise is not limited to those with excess income.

On the other hand, those with excess economic security often have the time and means to relax and go out on a large sailboat at whatever speed nature gives them. In which case the dolphins would likely have abandoned the kayaker and gone to play in the bow wave of the sailboat, whose wealthy children would be sitting on the rail with their feet dangling over the edge watching the dolphins from nearly touching distance, looking each other in the eye.
Overture Maps Foundation Releases General Availability of Its Open Maps Datasets
At least talking about it will start the slow expansion of the Overton Window
At least where I live (California US), that's not true. There are certain things which trigger a change in taxable value, but they're mostly only indirectly connected to appraised value. Un-accepted offers 100% definitely don't factor in and (for reasons already argued by others on this discussion) would probably cause more problems than they would solve if they _were_ taken into account.
Not sure what I can do inside a Google doc to improve it, but will check it out, for some of the more key ones.
Maybe, I still think Microsoft missed a golden opportunity. People installed Debian packages on the darned things. They could have "WSL" on the phones in the future.
Wow, reddit found a way to make themselves even less useful somehow. After the API fiasco, that seemed like it'd be pretty hard to do.
It still hasn't been synthesized, as far as we know of. Not even a single atom.
The mind of someone who is seeking things to write about, thus setting up new forms of craving and ego-gratification, misunderstanding transient experiences and insights to be significant milestones or fitting them into concepts that are constrained by one's ability to express them in language.
> Do you think that the thousands of cameras you encounter every day aren’t doing this already?

Of course that's happening. It's still worthwhile to reduce the amount of this sort of thing where possible, though.

> I think the aim for culture is to limit what we can do with these data, rather than to try to prevent collection of these data.

I agree that the real, serious issue isn't the photos themselves as much as the databases that hold them.

That said, why not address both problems? Particularly since we can't ever actually know if photos are being stored or not, but we (usually) can see the camera. In terms of verifiability, restricting the use of cameras is better than restricting the use of the data.
Show HN: How well do you know Hacker News?
One of the biggest drivers towards higher potency is ease of smuggling, which is a lot less of a concern for legal manufacturers. They’re also ripe targets for wrongful death lawsuits so there’s an incentive to keep the potency within reasonable limits unless the drug is relatively harmless. They can also accurately dose their drugs and make large pills, making it harder to accidentally overdose on doses that are measured in milligrams
Yeah. I just found manuals for both of them!

http://www.simulogics.com/archive/public/docs/dg/sw/os/aos/0...

http://www.simulogics.com/archive/public/docs/dg/sw/os/aos/0...

And dozens and dozens of other old DG manuals.

And an online Nova simulator, and binaries for downloadable DG simulators apparently based on SimH (which I thought did PDP/ VAX).
Out of interest, why do you say "Especially not for a king of Scotland"?
There was era when doping was not banned, especially in cycling. But they had to do something with increasing number deaths.

Also amateurs try to emulate pros whenever possible.