skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Honestly, I would be more worried about an elephant rampage, as it is significantly more likely.
Tons of alternatives. I like and work on open source OpenZiti - https://openziti.io/
If you bet on the market and not individual stocks, you’ll fair better. Find any 10 year periods where the s&p had crappy returns. The market doesn’t stay irrational, but specific sections can.
A few more I know are "minecraft", "do a barrel roll", and "recursion"
Clata telecom brings tarana ngfwa to Africa
> The situation that keeps Firefox and Linux from jumping all over H.265 is not some natural property of the universe, it's just a social construct that we uphold by willing choice.

Can you elaborate and/or link me to anything related to this?
Freakonomics Radio podcast recently featured a good episode on the subject:

https://freakonomics.com/podcast/should-companies-be-owned-b...
It's an honest question.
> To be clear about who is cutting off who, it's the Japanese merchants cutting Visa/Mastercard off as far as I can tell.

I don't think so. Particularly given that DLSite made the changes to their keywords that Visa/MC had presumably objected to, it looks like they were trying to play ball but Visa/MC still cut them off.
Well, there are worker-owned coops, and they haven't gone bust, so how does that work? It's almost as if the workers don't actually want to lose their jobs!
Boosting Engineering Productivity: A Step-by-Step Guide
That's the cliché, and I dont think it's even remotely true.
Thank you! I'm glad it caught your interest. Is there any particular feature that intrigues you the most? I'd be happy to provide more details or answer any questions you might have about ImgAI.ai.

If you have a chance to try it out, I'd love to hear your thoughts on the user experience and the quality of the AI-generated results. Your feedback would be incredibly valuable as we continue to improve and expand our offerings.
SpaceX sounds exactly like "space ex". Everything else is dishonest bs.
Imagine the data that was deleted is of the highest level of illegality you can imagine. Under no circumstance can your service be associated with that content.

- What was your "definition of delete" again?

- You mentioned some of the convenient technical defaults your frameworks and tools provide out-of-the-box, can you think of ways to improve the situation?

(You might re-run delete requests after restoring a backup; transaction should resolve in a timely fashion, failed deletes can be communicated to the user quickly etc.)
I'm interested in why you want to do this? What is the goal you are trying to achieve? Why would you not do this with salaries? Will there be some people paid more than others that do different roles? If so, why would their profit shares be the same? Who decides on war chest size? Ownership is an interesting word, because as you say if it was ownership then when an employee leaves they still get a share of profits and surely they could sell (otherwise it's not ownership). I've wondered myself about whether I should have some sort of union but what I really mean is an alternate reporting line to hear about problems. My suspicion is that there's a lot of what founders think of as profit that isn't really profit. My founder salary is probably around 25% of what I'd need to be willing a job. I'd everyone at the company did this we'd have a lot of extra "profit" to share out but it isn't real profit.
Everything works if you use User-Agent switcher extension. So they went through the trouble of making an "unsupported" page and redirecting you to that page instead of doing nothing
A water gun is a gun in the same way that a gummy bear is a bear.
A friend had to change the plane in Canada to travel from Europe to South America. He couldn’t attend the journey because he didn’t get a visa for Canada solely to take an onward flight.
> Worker coops often cut down on their individual profits in hard times to keep the boat afloat.

Sure, I believe that. Do they do it enough though? Co-operatives were big in 19th century Britain; now they make up a small part of the market for most things. In particular the Co-op supermarket, though it's cute, is now small (6% market share).

> A single worker doesn't move the statistical needle in a very large corporation? For one, the same fallacy comes up with voting. Secondly: This notion that people are rational robots who only optimize their profits and then also calculate the statistical impact of every of their actions is not just too theoretical, it's just wrong. Loyalty, trust and engagement are things you earn and maintain. A generous compensation (including stocks) can be a part of that.

It's really true that your vote won't decide the next election! I'm sorry :-)

You're right that generous compensation can maintain loyalty and I agree people aren't robots. But for that to save the argument you need more - stocks have to be better at maintaining loyalty than just straightforward pay. Is that true? Maybe: stocks are a "stake" in the company. Is it so true that many companies could improve efficiency by paying in stocks not cash? I'll believe it when I see evidence. Is it so true that we should force companies to do it? I find it highly unlikely and the evidence is clearly inadequate.

>An additional approach is to decentralize and enable partial ownership of franchises. Now suddenly the needle can be moved, day by day and year by year.

Sounds like McDonalds is your ideal of corporate structure :-) Maybe! It's certainly successful.
https://www.google.com/search?q=cat or https://www.google.com/search?q=dog then click the paw then click around the page

edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Google_Easter_eggs
What is the accuracy of the mapping you do and is it destructive? Do you deal with hot systems (steam/water equilibrium matters)?
No. I'm good. Thanks for asking, though.
The truth is demonstrable and since reality is complex, demonstrating it can be a life long pursuit. You are a climate change skeptic, which puts you against the scientific consensus which I agree with, which should have ended this discussion a long time ago.

I've engaged with your arguments more than I should have, I'm not going to change your mind.

I should have actually ended this discussion at "science can be bought" bit, which was a prima facie fallacy for climate change, when climate change deniers HAVE THE MOST MONEY, WHICH I HAVE POINTED OUT REPEATEDLY.

So basically you were accusing the weaker and poorer party of buying science while the more powerful and richer party did... What exactly? :-))))

LOOOL. Logic, there is little.

Have a nice day.
Interestingly, the web version uses newer satellite data than the app version, at least for some areas.
I'd encourage you to Google for some articles on how worker-owned coops stay in business. This isn't a radical new idea that's never been tried.
Your not being serious? It's a core app, and the amount of data they get out of it, makes it worth it.
We introduced a new "Collaborators" field which we can use to assign a task to multiple people.

Splitting up in small pieces sound like subtasks?
That does not make sense, wayland and xorg are fundamentally different. in X11 everything is global given that its the X.Org server that manages clients while the wayland compositor does most of the X.Org server by itself. This is also why writing a pure wayland compositor from scratch is much harder as you need to rewrite half of the X.Org server but at the same time in contrast to X11 you don't have security holes like a keylogger in few lines of code. In short, xdotool relies on the X11 protocol while a similar wayland app need a support in the compositor itself.

There is some attempts though like: https://github.com/atx/wtype
Some people find that determining what the conclusion is, is difficult to begin with. Or that there are many conclusions. And, how do you present those details? Chronologically?

A helpful techniques I've picked up (that some people absolutely hate); write down the individual statements on post-it notes. That way you can reshuffle. What would the story look like if A is 'the conclusion'? What if we start off with B? What does it look like if we present the supporting evidence chronologically? What if we present it in a more layered way? ("the colonel couldn't have done it, as on the day of the murder, he was in another city")

Another tip is for the introduction, the lead up to the conclusion; start with listing the facts that are common knowledge, then the fact that raised the question to be answered; then you reach the conclusion. (E.g. Every week, grandma bakes a pie and leaves it to cool in the window. Last week was no exception. But when she went to retrieve the pie, it was half-eaten! The culprit was the cat!) This setting the scene can give the reader some context. In a real-world example, the known facts might include your company's strategy or objectives, underscoring why people should care about your advice.
I disagree that everyone is equally suitable for every job. Why should someone pay you £5m? What would you do better than anyone else?
Embarrassing to not support something on day one of a beta? I wouldn’t feel any.
I remember that around year 2000 a coworker from England told me that petrol pumps changed the prices from pounds per gallon to pounds per liter when the cost crossed the one pound mark. There is some malice in that too. Something like that could be the origin of using different units in those USA shops, not to cross some psychological threshold.

It's been a long time since I went to the UK so I can't say if petrol is really sold by the liters there. Maybe somebody from the UK could confirm or refute the tale. Anyway it's probably way more than one pound per liter now.
And never forget excelsior geyser (crater) just up the road.
Congratulations, you developed the right intuition.

However in UX/DX the question isn't whether users can develop the right intuition based on how they interact with software over time and reading through the documentation but how to shorten the time and effort necessary for that, ideally so that a single glance is enough.

Do you think reading all the documentation for every feature of every tool you use in your life is a good use of your time and something that should be expected of everyone? As someone developing software used by other people, I don't.
My pension depends on other members of my country, as well as they depend on my. The feeling of safeness (event if it’s not 100% safe) and bound is what I call “society“, meaning we go forward together very much like what most feel with their family. Never ever will I live in a country that encourage people to compete instead of collaborate, it sounds better for the 1% stakeholders but not for the 99% others.
> questions swirled over just how long it will take for the substantial investments in the technology to pay off.

> “The overarching concern is, where is the ROI on all the AI infrastructure spending?”

I have an opinion which they wouldn't listen to anyways.
It is Bun influence / competition I guess. Good for everyone.
This is Apple. They don't expect their users to know what a User-Agent is (and even less how to install a User-Agent switcher extension).
I'm not worried about that too much to be honest.

To me beyond v4.4 or so, when it started being possible to create crazy recursive dependent types (the syntax was there since ~4.1 - it's just that the compiler complained), there weren't a lot of groundbreaking new features being added, so unless an external library requires a specific TS version to parse its type declarations, it doesn't change much.
Not really a tax on the poor, any more than banning cheap plastic straws. We are, unfortunately, in a climate crisis and all the C40 cities of the world have agreed to take action to mitigate the problem.

It's not perfect, but the alternative is to let emissions continue to rise and contribute to increased global warming. It's a tricky decision.
what makes public listing a good criteria for which the revenue cap be removed?

in fact, i dont get the rationale for revenue caps at all. It doesn't produce less inequality, and only produces inefficiencies.
Notice that it doesn't say "Brave Search solely operates from..." or "only operates from"?

Instead the wording leaves wiggle room for the possibility of using multiple.
Wait so you're telling me I can run podman on android?
If you're willing to try something a little bit different, Windows also has a single-click to open mode ('View->Options->Change folder and search options' in Win 11). To only select, you point and hover for a moment.
Here is the original:

https://maps.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.google.com/maps/pl...
may be the word is 'fitter', rather than 'better'.

After all, darwinian natural selection is taking place in a free-market economy.
I'm a big fan of the Origin Story podcast, where they dig into words/concepts and look at where they started and how the use has evolved over time. They also cover some things like people, or conspiracy theories.

Their Woke episode might be worth a listen.

https://open.spotify.com/episode/1ncWO9Aj1kMtQxBsHf0aYg

https://pod.link/1624704966/episode/0b0e2c363a94280fe0ae576b...
From personal experience, I'd wager that anyone buying that domain will receive a letter from a Facebook lawyer pretty quickly.
My mum has told me about her shopping habits in the 70s, she would have a list of everything they needed, she would walk around the first shop writing all the prices down. She would walk around the second shop buying the items that were cheaper, then return to the first shop to buy what was cheaper there.
Character creation is hard? Also I'm not sure this is entirely accurate. I generated an elf druid (the type I just created one of manually) and it gave me one less language than I should have, no wild shape, which feels pretty important for a druid character, one less spell than I should have and no actual details about what the spells do mechanically. Also I don't recognise half these classes from 5E, were they in an earlier edition of the game? And where's all my skills?
Is there enough water in the mouth to get sodium to explode? Probably just scalds you.

Elemental sodium in the air spontaneously oxidises to sodium hydroxide which is nasty and caustic but the hydroxide layer spontaneously forms bicarb which is comparatively harmless. At a best guess, I'm not convinced a block of sodium not swallowed is lethal... (it will be extremely harmful)
#HydrapurgerPaperMakingMachine #PaperMachineEquipment #PaperMakingMachine
Leave your email for price!
If you are interested, you can contact us.
Email address: wastepapermachine@gmail.com
https://www.flutingpapermachine.com/solution/kraft-liner-pap...
#papermill #papermachinepulpmachine #everyone
Microsoft was pretty famous for this in the 90s and 00s. Huge amounts of work was done by contractors, who were treated like second class citizens. There was even a big lawsuit about it, that changed how Microsoft uses contractors.
At the time, Google Maps on iOS was written by Apple, not Google, and Google was holding back API access for Street View until Apple sent back more location/tracking/demographic data on users that Google wanted.

Rather than sell out their users, Apple dropped Google Maps as the backend and launched their own maps, and then let Google write their own Maps app where they could do anything they wanted.
The article seems to imply that the company would need to hold cash enough to buy back all outstanding shares, which sounds absolutely bonkers to me?

Are the shares getting constantly diluted, how is that handled? How is valuation of shares done here? I can't really see this scheme working for public companies
If every company that offers goods or services prioritizes "worker happiness", by for instance refusing to excise unproductive divisions, then the result will be a world where everything costs more and takes longer. Not just consumer goods, but any sort of public infrastructure project, R&D, etc. If you think it takes too long or costs too much to build a school or fix a road in America these days compared to a few generations ago, it would only get worse. Every single sector of the economy would start dragging its feet with no regard for efficiently getting shit done.

If only some companies are coops, then those have to compete with companies that aren't and consequently they have to work efficiently or fail. The idea behind making them all be coops seems to be removing this pressure to perform. Bad idea.
That is probably it, never would have occurred to me. When doing international recipes doing a translation/conversion is not always straight forward. I cook a lot and often it becomes a investigation into the ingredients and what to replace rather than a simple conversion of units. Not something Alexa does.
I'm a bit disappointed that Go Mono (and the other Go fonts, https://go.dev/blog/go-fonts) aren't supported...
It would make more sense for Euston to be a deep level station and for HS2 to continue onto the mainline to Portsmouth/Bournemouth which have a similar population to Birmingham. I don’t think there will be the stomach to build a new high speed line but they could electrify the current line with overhead wires and replace the current fast trains with HS2 services. If Euston were a through station it would only need 4 platforms rather then 11. Stick another deep station under Victoria while you’re at it.
With a little trickery with URL's you could construct something like:

https://github.com/example/project/releases/@example-project...

Due to everything in a URL before the @ being interpreted as a username for basic authentication, this would result in the user navigating to https://example-project-v1.zip instead of to github.

Edit: Fortunately it seems like browsers have caught on to this trick
what the proposal for employee ownership _actually_ want to achieve is for the existing owners to have part of their ownership reliquished (without much, if any, compensation), and given to the workers.

AKA, the workers do not take on the prior capital risk that the owners have, but reap the rewards of success. Obviously, a failed company means no such shares given to the workers (by definition). Therefore, under this imagined scenario, the workers only gain.

of course, reality cannot work like this.
It's possible. But note that Germany has struggled to move out of declining sectors (petrol cars) and into new ones (tech) - which fits what I said about worker control making creative destruction hard. Its economic performance has been dramatically bad recently.

Equally, I wouldn't want to judge Rhineland capitalism on a few bad years, or claim that the US "open the casino" approach dominates it on every dimension.
> "The salary of the chief executive of a large corporation is not a market award for achievement. It is frequently in the nature of a warm personal gesture by the individual to himself."

The board decides the CEO's salary, no?
I'm hoping this is a typo '191 years ago'. Don't mean to sound pedantic just interested when this was. My friend was in Caltech for his MS + PhD in Electrical engineering from 2008 onwards. I think he graduated in 2014-ish.
Now please use the barista argument on what house wives should be paid.
> That only works for people that live in urban areas

Which is _only_ the majority of the global population.
I understand what you're saying. But ~8.5 million machines in 78 minutes isn't a fluke caused by undefined behavior. All signs so far indicate that they would have caught this if they'd had even a modest test fleet. Setting aside the ways they could have prevented it before it reaching that point.
Everything already costs more, because companies make crazy margins to make Bezos richer instead of making their products cheaper.
> So, what is it that Firefox and Chrome on Linux (and only on Linux) don't support?
H.265 is what they don't support.

Do codecs need to be supported by the browser itself? I thought this was unloaded to some media decoding framework. Linux does have h.265 support at least in mpv.
I learned about it years ago when I accidentally pushed secrets to the repo. When after rebasing and force pushing to the branch I was still able to access that commit, we decided to stop using GitHub.
That's why I disable HTML in emails
It seems to me that this is what happens when you have nobody in leadership who can do crisis management.

First thing you do in a crisis? Take a few breaths and calm down. Take the pressure off of yourself. Agree to a timeline and start gathering ideas. Brainstorm. Engage in risk assessment. Then decide, act, and re-evaluate.
Crowdstrike: Irredeemable just like their vouchers!
Nice analogy. Except CPU metrics at least tell you something about a physical flux.
Deeply appreciate people rewriting and polishing up stuff lower down in the stack. Its work like that that makes sure the house of cards our digital infrastructure has become doesn't just collapse.
I always saw "nation-state" used in that way as an implication of power and aggression, perhaps a polite euphemism for "has some sort of imperial designs over others".
Survivorship bias. You have to compare against all that have in fact gone bust over the same timeframe.
I've never looked at mine
It even predates iCloud, web mail launched with MobileMe.
I understand they "cannot test every possible browser" and that "users may get subpar experience".

I don't understand why there isn't "continue at your own risk" button. Maybe with a scary warning. It's kind of stupid that I have to spoof UA for a website to let me in. And in most cases, everything just works fine.

Maybe one day I'll create a website to inform about the issue.
the seller does.

And when the seller puts their stock on sale, it's because they believe the stock is going to go down (even more) in the future.
https://www.google.com/search?q=dutch+angle
You should write complex types in interfaces files where they belong, and there's full typescript support.

I use this approach professionally in teams with many developers, and it works better for us than native TS.
Honestly give it a try, I was skeptical at first.
Apple critique of Google's Topics API based on bad code
That was for version 2, not 3 or 3.1, if I recall correctly.
> No, the risk for regular employee is higher due to downside vs upside

People start businesses and actually risk everything they have on them. If you only look at someone who owns and runs the biggest company in the world, you're just using the apex fallacy[0] to justify your perspective, and hoping nobody notices.

[0] https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Apex_fallacy
Yep, it's these simple thingsthat are actually the killer features for me. Alexa is so cheap too (often given away free with other products like ring cameras) that I have them in most rooms.

Mainly I just use them as alarms, timers, a talking clock and for listening to radio. I occasionally ask it what time a local shop may close or similar.

For the little money I've spent on them I'm perfectly happy using them in such a superficial manner, they make life a little tiny bit easier and that's ok.
Thx will check it out
A basketball player named Yao Ming is unrealistic?
Ask HN: Will peer to peer services overtake centralised corporations?
We've watched huge centralised services thrive on top of the internet and become profitable companies. With that we've benefited a lot but also lost a lot of control. I don't think I'm saying anything surprising or new. I guess what I'm wondering is. Will we ever see strong peer to peer alternatives to these systems in the long run? At some point will we get to a place where we're actually happy to use a service provided by one person rather than a large entity? Markets and exchanges have existed for goods. Individuals provide services offline. But it seems online we really don't do this as much. Maybe the app store is some of that but still it skews heavily to big companies.
Coop is not a worker cooperative. It's a consumer cooperative, owned by its members, not workers.
They were seving them as lobsters back then and nobody knew the difference ;)

I imagine they would turn orange if you boiled 'em.