skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If memory serves... In the 60s and 70s there was a regular drumbeat of stories of people who had been committed against their will, usually for money-related reasons. So there came a wave of legal reform. Perhaps a bridge too far ?
Blind people? Have you ever tried the audio “alternative” some captchas offer them?
interesting, thank you for sharing your experience! in the example case my pixfunc is in fact not a closure, just a pure function, but it sounds like the performance would collapse if i made it a closure

(you can of course compile specialized versions of the inner loop for each fractal in c; 'just' use the preprocessor)

it seems plausible to me that it would be more convenient to reimplement a lua function in pallene rather than in c, especially for 'shallow' functions where the code for passing arguments and return values back and forth on the stack to lua is a substantial percentage of the total function code

but there's still the question of how good or bad the performance of the code generated by the pallene compiler is! it might be worth rewriting the code in c if gcc or clang produces faster code than pallene does, even if rewriting it in pallene would be easier
What you call a citation I call chicken bone divination. Just because economists believe in technical analysis doesn’t mean the rest of the world has to buy into their scam. Chiropractors are still frauds despite insurance companies going along with their scam.
Agreed. Annual is usually paid upfront in exchange for the discount you receive.

I paid for a year of Ghost Pro and realised after only a few weeks that I’d really rather use something else. It’s my mistake and there’s no comeback.

I have an annual Adobe subscription that I’m keeping around until the renewal - just for the last few jobs I might need it for - rather than cancelling. Maybe I’m just a sucker for sunk cost fallacy?
> For this bubble to workout we need to come up with artificial beings on the level of humans from limited use case LLMs.

Robots?

We've got loads of those already. Ones with super-human speed, super-human dexterity, super-human senses. Even got some cute tech demos where they get controlled by the OpenAI API.

I'm not sure why you think that's delusional.

But I'm also not sure why you think that's necessary, given that not only "all things which can be expressed in written form" can be used by an LLM, but also that the same architecture is fine with anything that can be tokenised which includes visual and audio tasks — i.e. most office jobs.

No, what's necessary for this to not be a bubble is for someone to figure out how to turn what exists into an actual business model.

"Business" is much less flashy, less cool, less exciting than tech demos filled with androids doing housework, parkour, or acting as a tour guide.
Unicode attempts to render all human-written documents. That's why U+A66E (ꙮ), a character found once in one single document, is still considered acceptable.

ẞ is not a good capital letter of ß, but if that one single book ever gets transcribed into digital text, a unicode character code is necessary for that to happen.

I doubt systems that can't deal with the ß -> SS transcription will be able to deal with ẞ in the first place.
The heart has access to the resources of the body.
Japan cracks down on use of rideable electric suitcases amid tourist boom
They are a problem for people who are immunocompromised. In particular they spread in hospital settings.
Plot twist: the real full self driving will be for customers to buy an Optimus and have it physically drive your Tesla.
I don’t know why you want to absolve the EU regulators. MS was trying to lock down the kernel because Windows was quite unstable due to all the buggy kernel software everyone was using. Security was a growing concern at the time, but it was mainly the system instability. Windows was literally a joke at the time, and everyone knew what a BSOD was.

So this was a predictable (and predicted) consequence of the legislation.

And sure, MS could have released both “open kernel” SKUs and “closed kernel” SKUs, but that would have made it essentially the purchaser’s choice — which it would have been anyway with just “open kernel” SKUs, so there is literally no point.

I think you’re also suggesting that the EU would somehow continuously and independently test and certify Windows and CS software as sound and safe? The cost to do this in any substantial way would be massive — a significant fraction of the dev budgets of the products covered — Windows, CS, and all the other products covered. The entire Horizon 2025 budget wouldn’t begin to cover it.
Congrats on building and sharing something you find useful! Sincerely.

But: split-panel layout is merely one of myriad features in Obsidian. Serious note-takers typically have a long list of UX and non-functional requirements, which require serious investment and/or a robust community & ecosystem. So I think you've got your work cut out for you to make a solo project in this space appealing to even a small minority. And that's before the "Might run ads later" kicker.
It says its compatible with the A500 emulator. Maybe that would work.
Oh this is fascinating. I'll have to keep an eye on the Tom Brady data since I was already doing something similar by hand for tracking all of his TDs [1]. I've wanted more detailed data for the data visualization piece of it [2] but it's a lot of work.

[1] https://tombradytds.com
[2] https://tombradytds.com/viz.php
You don’t need to be an optimist to see that the USA will only pull ahead on its genAI dominance and that genAI will power this boom and the next several.
If you copy something when a large corporation doesn't want you to, it's a violation of copyright law. If you don't copy something that a large corporate wants you to copy, it's a copyright violation.

Do we not own our computers? If not, let's end the charade. I know that will be less fun for those large corporations, but it's ultimately for their own benefit.
If you want something more extreme, read about the Broomway https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20170110-why-the-broomway... Read, but don't go there. You are likely to die.
Small populations make for terrible statistics.
Our taxes in Canada are a bit low, especially on the wealthy.

However your argument seems to stem from "if we give it to everyone and cut nothing where does the money come from". Well, a part of it comes from all the welfare programs it replaces (OAS, Ontario Works, etc) and a huge amount of it doesn't really exist (since for the vast number of people you'll tax back 100% of it anyway).

For the amount that's left, yes, one needs to choose a funding strategy. A real policy play with all the data available would have the needed numbers to begin to decide what that looks like
Gets ‘em every time.
It's a complex problem that hasn't even been formulated properly yet.

For example, every existing solution touts "security" and yet completely mangles the difference between authentication and encryption.

Authentication is important - you don't want random servers or users to enroll on your network, and you want good tools to rotate and manage secrets.

Encryption isn't important unless you care about state-level actors sniffing your traffic at the backbone. (And if you care about that then you already have your own datacenter.)

Meanwhile encrypting all network traffic is a huge performance penalty. (Orders of magnitude for some valid use cases.)
Well the company constantly cries that there is no connection to Beijing
What's the point of saying raison d'être instead of just saying reason? Why did you use a random french phrase here?
Wikipedia is not an individual actor or a hivemind, so there is no capital-T "They". It's a system of multiple people each acting on their own accord. For a developing news story like this, I find this type of sourcing acceptable, especially because it is cited as "some person on the internet claims", not as "it is true that".

If you disagree with this choice of source, you can flag this part as needing better sources. The simplest way to do so is to just leave a comment on the talk page.
Reddit is having a (characteristically) weird reaction to this news.

https://www.reddit.com/r/europe/comments/1eetmee/farleft_ext...

I don't get why it's so hard to believe that anarchists would do exactly what they say they want to do. The anarchists I've met are steadfast about anti-nationalism and it's hard to imagine a more globally nationalistic event than the Olympics.
I’m super interested in BCI in general, but not convinced hobbyist (< $1000) equipment is useful enough to be worth the investment at this point.

Once a year or so I check in on Emotiv and OpenBCI and Neurosky and others, and so far nothing seems to hit the affordable + casually hackable spot that will make me pull the trigger.

So yeah I’m interested, but primarily in a turnkey solution from hardware to software libraries.
Building a basic event-driven system in Rails
iOS App Finder Discover the best iOS tools
> I think you read it completely wrongly.

To be frank, I don't think I did, I think you are taking it to the other extreme :)
Also, documentation extends beyond just your code.

My issue is also that the alternatives given are not really alternatives for many organizations. Communicating more without an excess of meetings, overloading key individuals, etc. is extremely difficult to pull off.

Finally, I strongly believe that outdated documentation is better than no documentation. At the very least, it provides capable people with a starting point. Where without documentation, the starting point is still zero.

As I said in my earlier comment, it is much easier to communicate about something if your starting point is better defined.

Besides, good documentation accounts for this:

- If you know specifics will be subject to change, then simply mention that some specific aspect is subject to change.

- If something is already covered by external documentation, link to that documentation.

- When there are prerequisites someone reading the documentation might need, don't duplicate the documentation of those prerequisites but do make the reader aware of the documentation aware.

The thing, I suspect anyway, is that good documentation is also good communication. Both of which people and organizations at large struggle with. I still firmly believe though that good documentation forms the best foundation for other ways of communicating.
The suspects are anarchists, they generally despise socialist governments, and most of all they despise both modern Russia and what was the USSR.
Cyborgs really hitting the mainstream these days