skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I evaluated ddr4 vs ddr5 a year ago, and it wasn’t worth it. Chasing FPS and the cost to hit the same speed in ddr5 was just too high, and I’m glad I did. I’m on a 13700k and I’m also very stable. However, with the stock XMP profile for my ram I was very much not stable and getting errors and bsods within minutes on an occp burn in test. All I had to do was roll back the memory clock speed a few hundred mhz.
> Some things (FUSE) are still annoying though.

That should get much easier in macOS Sequoia with FSKit.

https://developer.apple.com/documentation/fskit/
>To me, that behavior is tantamount to asserting that what you have to say is more important than everything everyone else is doing. If there's a fire, maybe it is.

depends on your workplace. There were dedicated quiet rooms workers would go in when they really needed to focus. Meanwhile, being in the lounge was a sign for a more lax work period. You don't really get that social messaging, especially since some people never update their status, or worse yet are eternally "do not disturb".

>but I have many more outside of work, and deeper friendships besides...Sometimes folks desire deeper work friendships as a substitute for friendships outside of work.

I don't. Only thing harder than befriending remote coworkers is trying to keep up with flaky meetup members you see once and never again. If you didn't stay in physical contact with schoolgoers, I have no clue how men c. 2018+ actually make friends post college. Maybe if I played sports it'd be different.

but sure, if you could solve this conundrum (I've tried for some 6 years now) I could easily concede to remote work.
If only we could get a tiny Lisp loving push from the HN crew, wink, nudge.

I don't much like the odds of Lisp vs. Nintendo hardware kickstarters.
Yes, because my blog is basically a collection of things people have asked me more than once.

* How do I rent a motorcycle in Taiwan?

* What's a coding bootcamp like?

* What's your emacs config?

* Got any book recommendations?

* You got into Raw? How was it?

* Didn't you parents come to Taiwan? Mine are coming next month, what did you do with them?

etc. I'm constantly dropping links to people at networking events or when they come into my restaurant. I also just forget things constantly and so my blog is basically my external brain.
it can't be a function because the source is only guaranteed to be available at compile time, rather than at runtime.
Because if publishers don't publish then they don't make money.
Discussion (139 points, 12 hours ago, 336 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41033005
would have been funnier to counter offer with 300% of the compensation they offered.
It reads like Jordan Peterson nonsense.
Appreciate your view, as yours was one I was thinking of canvassing.

That said, the "how to deal with Nazis in the bar" story comes strongly to mind:

<https://old.reddit.com/r/bartenders/comments/j7y3cu/how_to_d...>

I remember when YC had some group with PT on it. What I remember is that rather than kick PT out, the group itself was dissolved ... and then reformulated, with the prior members sans PT. That seemed to me at the time an elegant solution. Reading what pg had written, and is writing now, makes me strongly doubt my previous rationalisation.

I've written on this ... sometime, somewhere, though apparently not on HN at least by Algolia's search. The story itself is mentioned by BuzzFeeed News <https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ryanmac/y-combinator-cu...> and Business Insider <https://www.businessinsider.com/y-combinator-billionaire-ven...>, both on 17 November 2017.

As for PT: he's told us enough times who he is. I'm taking the well-founded advice to believe him.
Hopefully Intel ships them, and allows them to, test and publish benchmarks with the current pre-release microcode revision for review comparison.
Sure they can offer it on paper, unsure if it'll be worth anything in four year or even four months.

At least with FAANG you know barring cataclysmic events It'll be valuable down the road.
Decentralisation IMHO another key to building durable complex systems. It’s worrisome to see modern systems become more and more centralised.
Don’t ignore the other aspects of compensation: raises, bonuses, vacation days, health insurance, etc.

It’s not just salary.
Startups should do the hard thing
Well,its the same situation as being a neighbor of russia,turkey or iran. All the old land empires,that convert any internal threat to stability into expansionist military campaigns. Its a horrific Tradition, the us put an end too when they imposed anti domino theory. Its just has been invisible for the racist western left, that cant imagine someone none western acting colonial.
You still haven't invalidated my point. The managers chose Windows, instead of choosing something else, like Linux, Mac, Sun, SGI, Cray, etc., for various reasons (possibly including cost, availability of qualified employees, etc.).

They did not choose Windows because a bunch of devs from India were too poor to buy Macs, which was the original assertion.
Whats the deal with (Amazon) bots crawling private Gitlabs aggressively?
> a bunch of people doing due diligence on an acquisition

I bet those people rarely get promoted for preventing an acquisition, though. Probably that is why we see so many crazy acquisitions, in general.
I am still clearly missing something as 2030 is only in 5 years.
Fun fact:

> Wiz was founded in January 2020 by Assaf Rappaport, Yinon Costica, Roy Reznik, and Ami Luttwak, all of whom previously founded Adallom

> Adallom was founded in 2012 by Assaf Rappaport, Ami Luttwak and Roy Reznik, who are former members of the Israeli Intelligence Corps’ Unit 8200

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiz_(company)
Not only that, they are the advertising industry, or at least a major player. Moves like Manifest V3, continuing 3P cookies and user-hostile moves on YouTube are all a part of that.

Chrome should really not be a part of Google IMO. It's a significant conflict of interest.
What's the highest offer for it that you've rejected? That seems like a fair lower bound.

(Not that I necessarily support a Georgist tax in this case, since it seems that your interest in the domain is noncommercial in nature)
Most humans on earth are trying to survive, they just don't see a viable path in front of them
After I quit my last job, I ended up starting my own thing - wasn't ready to go through the hassle of interviewing again.
is there a goal in undervolting? Is it about minimizing the energy consumption of a Wii system? If so, how much did they save?
You'd have an assessor compare it against domains that had traded recently (someone else mentioned beer.com), perhaps ask interested buyers to give a quote.
Because the benchmarks will still exist on the sites after the microcode is released and a lot of the sites won't bother to go back and update them with the accurate performance level.
> It's been submitted to HN many times but has never spawned any discussion:

It could be because, at least for me personally, I found the first 15 minutes to be a little too boring. Perhaps people just gave up before then.
It says one of the big differentiators with 'traditional workflow orchestrators' is that is supports cyclic graphs. But BPMN (and the orchestrators using it) also supports loops.
In Red Hat ecosystem there is an Ansible role to that end : https://github.com/linux-system-roles/postgresql
I don't know if it will help everyone but it could be a good way to standardize and maintain an instance configuration
Ask HN: Is there room for a new email hosting service?
There are tons of email service, free or premium or custom domain hosting. Most popular ones are Google, Outlook. The most recent new player in the market that I know was Hey.com. I wonder, if the market has room for new email service provider in the market. If yes, what sort of innovation should we expect, or email problems to solve?
This sounds uselessly crippled, as it's not going to catch malware that doesn't drop anything to disk, or that adequately cleans up after itself if it does.
Note how they mentioned its still going to be tested with various partners before released.

Ie we think this might solve it, but if it doesn't we can roll back with the least amount of PR attention.
As I understand it, there are multiple voltages inside the CPU, so just monitoring the motherboard VRM won't cut it.

That said I too am very skeptical. I just issued a moratorium on the purchase of anything Intel 13th/14th gen in our company and waiting for some actual proof that the issue is fully resolved.
There’s no way you can replace competent programmers with ChatGPT. I still have to check the output all the time and it’s often wrong or just doesn’t even know what I’m asking about.
Cloud flare will still be the internet in ten years, while Amazon will just be Walmart,
> That negates any arguments you had related to failure rates.

I mean it's hard for us to say, without sufficient data. But Intel might have that much data.

Also what argument about failure rates? The one where I said "if" about failure rates?

> Er, I’m not even sure how to respond to this. GamersNexus has indicated they know about the oxidisation issue, intel subsequently confirm it was known internally but no public statement was made until now.

GamersNexus thinks the oxidation might be the cause of the instability everyone is having. Intel claims otherwise.

Intel has no reason to lie about this detail. It doesn't matter if the issue is oxidation versus something else.

Also the issue Intel admits to can't be the problem with 14th gen, because it only happened to 13th gen chips.

> Intel has known about these issues for some time and said nothing. Nothing they say now can be trusted unless it involves them admitting fault.

If you don't trust what Intel said today at all, then you can't make good claims about what they knew or didn't know. You're picking and choosing what you believe to an extent I can't support.
For new and expensive schemes it is often a challenge to figure out who will be paying for it. The proponents typically don't want to say for the obvious reason - the people paying for a universal service will probably be worse off than if they weren't so it isn't helpful to identify them (they'll just add to the resistance). But that means it is awkward to attack an idea on cost because detractors don't propose the scheme and are often dealing with people unwilling to suggest realistic costs or tax schemes. People with technically excellent arguments have to be a bit oblique in pointing out that someone has to pay and it'd speed the debate along for someone to figure out who. For a UBI, we might suspect it isn't going to be billionaires.

The fair way would be if sentences had to pattern match "I think [scheme] is a good idea and we will pay for it by [specific tax proposal].". Seems unlikely in practice though.
As a former professional designer (and current improvisational musician( myself I would even come at it from the other direction: There is no true originality to begin with. Everything you do borrows from somewhere else, except maybe the things you do by accident.

But there is still a difference between a designer who blatantly slaps an existing aesthetic onto your project and a designer who tries to come up with a suitable look from first principles.

Design isn't styling, it is the visual organization of information with styling. So unless your information is the same the outcome will differ anyways.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_unification
How’s that going? Do you see yourself going back to a 9-5 job in near future?
Your prior argument was about sensors being performant having to reside within the kernel -- a very general argument -- of which the macos provides one counterexample in its official documentation. So the problem is in your original argument.
only 20% of Harvard graduates got all of the questions correct
Sex Differences in Work Preferences, Life Values, and Personal Views
That consistency is built on assumptions about the filesystem that may not hold true of a copy made concurrently by a backup tool.

e.g. The database might append to write-ahead logs in a different order than the order in which the backup tool reads them.
Is there something similar for MySQL that covers backup and restore too?
Or as fast as Kia EV6, Porsche waters down EV ambitions as it doesn't have competitive vehicles.
There's fundamental nature of entropy, but as usual it's not very enlightening for poor monkey brain, so to explain you need to enumerate all its high level behavior, but its high level behavior is accidental and can't be summarized in a concise form.
That's great, how's that working out ? Is it more or less the same ? Or are there major differences ?
Which country are you from? And how old are your friends? I heard a lot of this from the US but from my impression it's quite different in the EU (or maybe just in my bubble?)
Probably referring to so-called "Han unification" which tried to use same codepoints for different glyphs to reduce code space for ideograms derived from Chinese ones.

But that only causes confusion because you need to provide external information which way to interpret them, just like a code page
> linux sees every file twice, once encrypted and once decrypted

fixing this should prove profitable
Great write up. Do you plan to have similar for MySQL as well?
Most likely reason is FTC. Wiz integrates with big 4 cloud providers. No way FTC is allowing Google to take control. JD Vance's nomination and support for current FTC chair(Lina Khan) doesn't help.

Current FTC is good(personal opinion) from anti trust point of view but maybe bad for startup exits[0].

[0] https://x.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/1812978264484552987
It's not an "excuse". I'm surprised that you've never seen bad lawyer referrals. You honestly haven't? (and I'm not talking about general practitioners).

I've also seen a (pedigreed) General Counsel that sank a tech company.
I haven't read the books but I've heard a lot of people say the ending of book 3 sucks a lot, so I'm assuming GP means the books
I remember there was oss and alsa.
Then on top of that you had esd or artsd, with incompatible APIs and userland delays.
Then at some point they were replaced with pulseaudio. I've just noticed now that pulseaudio is also replaced with pipewire in latest Ubuntu.

That does not instill confidence in that they have any idea what they are doing.

I remember that as far as on 2012 some Linux game ports from Steam (before Proton was a thing) failed to play sound.

Other than that, it took them a decade to figure out that sound should switch to HDMI when it is plugged in. It may still require arcane config changes and may break down.

I've opened the post to read about pipewire, and it seems that clicking an anchor does nothing. So it's not only sound they can't get right.
There should be a law that you can’t offer security at a premium. It’s too important.

Paying less to reduce security is a baffling business model.
My 13900k has definitely degraded over time. I was running bus defaults for everything and the pc was fine for several months. When I started getting crashes it took me a long time to diagnose it as a CPU problem. Changing the mobo vdroop setting made the problem go away for a while, but it came back. I then got it stable again by dropping the core multipliers down to 54x, but then a couple months later I had to drop to 53x. I just got an rma replacement and it had made it 12 hours without issue.
@dang or whoever: I want to protest the recent (as in, after it was originally posted) addition of "in mice" to the title of this thread. It turns a significant scientific discovery into something that seems tawdry and meaningless. Discoveries in mice involving novel biological mechanisms can be important for at least 3 reasons:

- The mechanisms discovered work exactly the same way in humans. This is not a long shot at all, as mice aren't that far from humans genetically and physiologically.

- The mechanisms work slightly different in humans, pointing us to different natural solutions to a problem.

- The mechanisms work entirely different in humans, pointing us to potentially-important evolutionary divergences (maybe the biology was improved on in humans).

In any of these instances, the findings remain important, and "in mice" just cheapens that. After all, this work was published in Nature, which is still one of the top journals in any research field. The folks running the journal may have their issues, but they're not all idiots.

Edit: wording.
Entropy in Physics is usually either the Boltzmann or Gibbs entropy, both of whom were dead before Shannon was born.
What market are you in? We can only speculate based on presumptions.
amazing opportunity to connect the unconnected.
Let me know if you want to outsource!
EVs Are Cheaper Than Ever. Can Car Buyers Be Won Over?
> It turns a significant scientific discovery into something that seems tawdry and meaningless.

> Discoveries in mice involving novel biological mechanisms can be important [...]

If discoveries in mice can be important, then how does stating that they're in mice make them less important?
Each of the four founders (CEO, CTO, Product, R&D), https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/hjpwti2dr
Right, I recognize the name.

Curious though, I'm pretty sure it emits MSIL rather than its own bytecode like sharpl? So that would be one difference, in most cases an advantage because of performance.

The other obvious difference is I'm not aiming for any standards, quite the contrary; this is about being so fed up with the alternatives (including Scheme) that spending the rest of my life getting it just right looks like a reasonable deal.
Reading the user's profile information _is_ the delegated action. OAuth providers were already doing this prior to OIDC but in incompatible ways. OIDC standardized how that information is requested and returned.
The kawaii forum post says the undervolting allows them to passively cool the wii
PLAN copying / rotating fleet of DARPA ACTUV (ASW Continuous Trail Unmanned Vessel). Park them outside sub home ports (outside of territorial waters / contiguous zone but within active sonar range) and blast sonar to keep continuous track once they're underway. Likely then hand off to faster/more powerful surface ASW platforms. Combine with rumored mini nuke boats from PLAN, especially if autonomous improves to drastically reduce manning (less mouths to feed to match endurance of big nuke boats), basically tailgate nuke boats the second they leave parking lot. Trumpet following girl meme. Economically, hard to say, but only fraction of very expensive to operate 14 boomers/SSNs on deterrent patrol at any given time.

That said, IMO hardly matters, sea/air leg of triad can be replaced by redundant / distributed land, not silos but road mobile TELs in hardened shelters probably for MUCH cheaper per warhead - PLA/PLARF model. Can have 1000s of cheap TEL trucks / fake warheads to play shell game and be just as impossible to decapitation strike as a few SSNs with 20 missiles. Mobile land leg just politically not sensible because it means unambigiously painting target on homeland, not just empty silo fields in bumfuck nowhere. IMO half the reason of sea/air leg now is they're out of sight/out of mind doing distant patrols. No one wants to see a nuclear TEL driving down the highway and process implications. If anti missile defense improves, cost/benefit of limited magazine SSNs gets even worse - a tube on a 2.5B+ nuke boat cost 100m to acquire + likely very expensive operation costs per shot to field. You can buy 500+ HEMTT 8x8 to hull around solid fuel ICBMs for that price. PRC can probably buy 1,000. Economics of nuke boats as delivery platforms outside of psychology does not seem to make sense, but civilian psychology when it comes to nuclear planning is very important.
People say it because they experience similar cliffs in the tax system even with higher incomes.

I live in the UK. Currently my marginal tax rate is something like 65% because for every £100 I earn, I pay 40% income tax, 12% national insurance, 9% student loan (which functions more like a tax here than a real loan), and I lose something called child benefit when I earn more.

So yeah, I want to earn more, but it's pretty marginal returns for the extra work, stress and responsibility until I've totally lost child benefit (lost totally at £80k) and then I start to keep more of the income again. And then at £100k you lose the government support for childcare, you start having to pay interest on all savings accounts, and so between £100k and £120k you can be worse off than before rather than better off, especially if you have multiple children.

That's not to say that the incentives are the same on the low end of the salary scale but you can see why people might think it.
I'm based in the EU as a fullstack developer and nothing changed much, I'm hearing that there's a crisis on the US market but it's not reaching the EU yet or it's so small that it's not visible to me.
On the one hand, even with the post-crash dip, CRWD has a $60.9 billion market cap, there's certainly marketshare to be taken from them. On the other hand, Wiz doesn't have an endpoint protection product (which is what failed for CRWD). They'd have to build one from scratch, which requires dedicated talent (engineers with kernel experience) that they might not have.

If anyone is going after CRWD it'll be one of their other competitors.
Oi! Baldy

Just accept that it is part of life and of being male.

Its because we have testosterone.

save yourself a small fortune in hair cuts

Buy yourself some decent hair clippers

No 1, job done

If you want hair on your head grow a beard
As a designer, one eventually thinks not about what they liked in other people's work but why it worked. You can derive a design out a compendium of some things that you've seen that you like, but ultimately, to be successful you need to know why what you're copying made sense for its purpose. Perhaps you need to even encounter the same problem; it takes a bit of maturity to copy effectively.
> That take seems naive. A lot of malware works by getting the full consent of the user. Users often have no idea what they’re consenting to or the implications of it.

That's IMO quite the defeatist attitude.

Is there any way around this? And if so, who can go that way?

In my opinion it's only Microsoft that can unilaterally improve the situation, not the least by letting the user make those decisions in the first place and also have him live with the consequences (loss of time / money).

They will learn, especially after experiencing pain due to a wrong decision.

A nanny OS that decides by itself won't make the user learn and it will always have loopholes.
Because people have a tendency to automatically dismiss findings when they're said to be "in mice".
I suppose they'd add this to the GCP family of products, same as Apigee.
Does the U.S. make weapons-grade U235 anymore except for research? I thought gun-type fission weapons were phased out for safety and efficiency reasons. I also thought essentially all "fission" weapons today are fusion-boosted, and I thought the implosion type was the only production-ready design of fusion-boosted weapons.
This is pretty dated and doesn't support whisper which is the de-facto speech recognition model currently
Imo the biggest problem with student loans is that they don’t assess the credit worthiness of what they’re paying for in any way. Student loans and mortgages are the only two times that most consumers access huge lines of credit on very good terms. But unlike mortgages (which are already prone to creating the occasional credit crisis), student loans don’t assess the value of the “asset” they’re underwriting. You can’t get a $100,000 mortgage on a house that’s only worth $50,000, but you can get a $100,000 student loan on a degree that’s worth exactly $0 in potential future earnings. If you assessed student loan applications on that basis, the student debt “crisis” goes away.