skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think it's pretty obvious there's a leftist bias on this site.

Good luck with the cackler :)
You admit that bugs are inevitable and then claim a bug free parser as the most important bullet. That seems flawed to me. It would certainly be nice, but is that achievable?

Policy changes seem more reliable and would catch other, as of yet unknown classes of bugs.
There was also an intense pro-Biden anti-Bernie media campaign before the South Carolina primary. Fun times.
Crazy how my original comment has been flagged now. If this was such a loony take, why are people even interacting with it.
Technically prior to that wasn't the VP always the runner up? Practically we had two parties thanks to Hamilton and Jefferson, but the rules weren't specific to that unless I missed something important there.
Sure. Most will just diagnose ADHD and autism willy-nilly though, hence the realistic poor boundaries.

I have tried that. I will see a specialist with proper over-the-top tools when I can. But the people I see are renowned for over diagnosing too these days.
Doctor-prescribed videogame for ADHD
What sort of chocolate are you eating?
How do you know to which libraries the c++ binary was statically linked to?
Maybe but we have also seen a swing in how politics works (gotten more extreme). During the last two decades I've gone from Republican to Democrat to independent (never-Trumper, Democrat by GOP moral forfeit). I wonder how my beliefs would have evolved if US politics didn't grow so extreme over time.
Both of them are in the age bracket where the annual probability of death is so high, that the chance of dying within the next four years is over 50%:

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/probability-of-dying-by-a...

Can't really deliver on your campaign promises if you're more likely than not to be dead before the end of your term.
I'll paste the same comment here as I did in the sibling; Why should complex numbers need justification? If you need to do serious computation, you need them. If you say Zig is not for number crunching which Java explicitly decided then fine otherwise searching for a reason for complex number tells me that you don't do any numerical programming which is fine but asking for justification makes no sense. Why is any other thing in the language justified?
This is an interesting thought experiment. What would the US be like with a completely impossible ticket? Would we flourish under a Lenny Bruce-Knuckles the Echidna ticket? What if Misty and Brock were the respective RNC and DNC chairs? These are the sorts of questions the status quo politicians don’t want us to be asking
we weren't talking about money; we were talking about 'Coins (specie that had a direct connection to a ruler, usually with the name or visage of the ruler struck on them)'

those specifically emerged in 7th century lydia, and that emergence is what the article is about
Not round here, massive support fur incumbant local mp even from those that vote another way at council elections
Why should complex numbers need justification to be native type? If you need to do serious computation, you need them. If you say Zig is not for number crunching which, say, Java explicitly decided then fine otherwise searching for a reason for complex number tells me that you don't do any numerical programming which is fine but asking for justification makes no sense. Why is any other thing in the language justified? float64 is just two float32. Why stop at float64 why not float128 float256?
Definitely. Otherwise it would have required a lot more than a single blog post. It is an observation, not anything rigorous with a large number of examples, and decent statistics.
I like to make off-topic comments once in a while almost for sport, or humour I guess, but when such comments are down-voted, I try to just ignore it.
Why does every comment on the post seem that is was written by an LLM?
> exactly which security guarantees does the TPM make and to whom does it make them?

I suspect you already know. What the TPM provides is little more than what you get from the trademark and model number off an iPhone. The model number tells you precisely what the hardware is. The trademark proves that it's an Apple phone and model, not someone else's. As for "who does it tell" - the answer is anybody who cares to look.

The analogy breaks down because TPM does a much better job of it than a trademark and model number. There are fake iPhone's out there that fool people. Your bank relies on a TPM's claim your PIN or whatever is stored in Apple iPhone's secure enclave it's an ironclad guarantee. Even more remarkably this assurance can be given remotely without the bank ever being near phone.

As for "does your ad network really need to know how to disable DRM protections?" you are generally in control of whether the bank or ad network gets to access the TPM. Generally it's just a case "it you don't like the idea, don't install the banking app".

As for "stop it before it gets to the children", this child likes the convenience of he gets from giving banks, password managers and whatever the security of knowing they are running on hardware they trust not to leak my creds to random hackers. Sure, it can be used for other things, but shrug - if you don't like that, don't install the app.
It's not the language per se, but Ada helps by being a bit more tedious on the initial implementation side, but vastly more helpful on the "okay, what the fuck did I write here, how does it work, and what happens when it fails?" side.

Sometimes, a good choice of language can help you mitigate sticky wickets that aren't language problems in their own right.
Curious as to why it would need updates.

Security updates sure, but what really needs to update on an STMP (+ TLS?) solution?
This was a forgone conclusion since the debate but there needed to be prolonged drama to save face
Stop acting in bad faith.

Other commenters replied to the same parent, challenging their claim.
Hey how are you doing, it's been a while and I thought I'd check in.

Hey thanks! Things are going pretty well, how about you?

Same. We should get lunch or grab a beer soon.

Yeah sounds good, I'd like that.

Simple.
Testing AI systems is challenging. We ran into this question collaborating on an AI system that revises sales contracts.

Some of the questions we had to answer were:

- What makes the advice output by an AI assistant "good legal advice"?

- How do we break down the output of our system into discrete steps that we can test?

- How do we map each of those discrete steps into our definition of "good legal advice" to make it measurable?

To do this we had to come up with a process, starting from breaking down the AI legal advisor into testable components, through transforming open ended legal and usability questions into measurable quantities, and concluding with writing unit tests using Vitest and Poyro (https://github.com/poyro/poyro), a Vitest plugin we built, to find where the system did not align with expectations.

The steps we ended up following to come up with the tests are applicable to non-legal AI apps.

The link (https://docs.poyro.dev/essays/unit-testing-a-legal-ai-app) provides runnable code examples for these tests that you can play with. Hope you find this interesting, we found it insightful and fun to walk through a concrete use case end to end.
> all can be had better elsewhere with smaller, cheaper, quieter, more discrete hardware with lower power consumption

Would you mind sharing a link to a nice write-up?
Your second paragraph contradicts the first. If the analysis applies to what many people use, it is very much relevant.
your logic in the first sentence of your first paragraph is quite faulty.

how did you jump from C to all programming languages, in the context of that statement? I did not say anything of the kind.

I can't waste my time explaining things multiple times to different people who don't get it, when others have got it.

maybe check my answers to the other people in this subthread, if you are that interested, for what is such a trivially obvious matter.

good luck.
Microsoft is changing the way it updates Windows
> From what I read and experienced, it makes the size of the Git repository much bigger than it should be...

Of course, it's a trade-off, but how is that particular one more painful than being at the whims of (and paying for) a third-party provider for something as mundane as static image files?
It's barely been a few hours yet I've seen this idea making the rounds. Seems manufactured.
the page also contains criticisms from left-wing and even anarchist thinkers; basically their criticism is that graeber's work amounts to storytelling, a cartoon version of history as you said, not research
This is what happens when you start to believe in the pretense
I agree with aspects of this take. In my original post I think that "should" is a strong word.

Realistically companies only have an obligation to make themselves profitable so really companies "should" only strive for profitability within the boundaries of the law above all else.

AMD have no obligation to drive an open standard, it's at their discretion to choose that approach - and it might actually come at the cost of profitability as it opens them up to competitors.

In this case - I believe that hardware & platform software companies that distribute a closed platform which cannot be genuinely justified as anything other than intending to prevent consumers from using competitor products "should" be moderated by regulator intervention as it results in a slower rate of innovation and poor outcomes for consumers.

That said, dreaming for the regulation of American tech giants is a pipe dream, haha.
Could you clarify what you think my agenda as a trans person is?
Press release:

https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/nvidia-transitions-fully-t...

Yet to personally try it out, but this should eventually enable better integration with the library ecosystems. =3
It’s hard for me to say it because it’s not like Trump was actually “coherent”, he just didn’t seem like he was on death’s door.

Also, wouldn’t me saying I hate him a lot but still acknowledge he won lend more legitimacy to it? Like it’s actively working against my biases and I still acknowledge he won.
And here I just bought a laptop with a 13900HX...
RFK Jr and Nicole Shanahan are running, and already on the ballot in 29 states. Though you won't see them interviewed on CNN or Fox News, many polls show them winning against Trump.

One of the reasons that RFK Jr started his campaign last year was a poll by Zogby which "surveyed over 26,000 likely voters across all 50 states, indicated that Kennedy could potentially outperform both President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump in head-to-head matchups." I believe the poll showed the majority of independent votes going to RFK Jr, and a significant portion of D and R votes going to him as well.

Given recent events, perhaps Trump is now much more popular, but previously polls showed RFK Jr beating Trump.

https://www.kennedy24.com/
James C. Scott, author of Seeing Like a State, has died
U misunderstood that. Its correlation.
Of course every bill is going to allocate money. But there's a difference between allocating money accompanied by a policy reform and passing a bill with the sole purpose of flooding an industry/market with government money.

The IRA is trying to address climate change, yes. But there's the problem of relying on government to have any idea of where to inject money to make the most difference, trusting the government to not just inject money wherever it benefits the most politically connected, and avoiding massive fraud (see the SBA loans during COVID). Not to mention the insane irony of something called the "Inflation Reduction Act" being a massive spending bill.

Point being: Number of bills passed and billions of dollars spent will be terrible metrics for how effective a politician is because of all those nuances.
Assuming the Democrats go with Harris, I can say whole heartedly that I won't be voting this year. I view voting as a responsibility to pick a candidate I want to lead rather than a vote to block someone I don't want to lead. This time around I have seen no candidate I could feel even mildly comfortable with.

I'm not happy about it, but given my view on why I should vote I don't feel comfortable voting for Trump, Harris, or Biden. Voting for one to spite another would require me first to change my mind on what a vote means or cave on my principles.
I’d argue their evidence was just as weak. I also didn't say hey it works fine I said here is counter evidence.

We probably need a fully rigorous study to conclude anything. Which is not what the author or myself did.
Very different technologies. The PyPy JIT is a tracing JIT where hot paths of execution are identified, then that specific path is compiled and optimized. Same as LuaJIT.

The CPython JIT is a newer and less invasive technique called copy-and-patch[1]. It's a lot less powerful, but a lot easier to plug into an existing language implementation: known sequences of python bytecode are mapped to templates of machine code

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copy-and-patch
>> And if it was wrong, well, maybe I'll get a bill or a check in the mail, but that was always a possibility and making a mistake on your taxes isn't illegal.

If this is your approach to your taxes then you are probably wasting your time by using either of Google or ChatGPT. Just punch some numbers in to TurboTax based on a quick skim of the buttons, say “good enough for government work,” and wait for a check or a bill in the mail baby.
Trump was the last GOP President and clear winner of the last primary, so of course he is the leader of the party and in charge of it.
Did the climate stop changing?
Its really simple though.

Do you want a dictator with near unlimited legal immunity in charge of the country? Thats what the November vote is for. Everything else is secondary.
How the DNC delegation will work
What it contains is a lot of evidence that they had every intention of suppressing medical evidence, and they repeatedly insisted on having that ability. It's hardly a stretch to say that they've likely made good on those threats when work is submitted to them which never gets published.
I keep imaging being in a Sorkin-esque West Wing timeline
The majority of DNC delegates are normal people and local elected officials, elected by local districts and state delegations.
From your source:

"in a major escalation of the Russo-Ukrainian War, which started in 2014."

Russo-Ukrainian War: "The ongoing Russo-Ukrainian War began in February 2014. Following Ukraine's Revolution of Dignity, Russia occupied and annexed Crimea"
moot is not and has never been permabanned from SA. He hasn't posted since 2008 but his singular non-perma ban was for posting anime spoilers in 2004: https://forums.somethingawful.com/banlist.php?userid=32422. A bunch of the raspberry heaven crew got perma'd and were a core part of 4chan's early userbase, but that happened after 4chan was created.
I think you are looking at a too narrowly defined avenue to achieve this effect.

There are multiple avenues to train a model to do this. Most simply is a finetune on training examples where the the internal monologue is constructed in a manner that precedes the <aloud> tag and provides additional reasoning before the output.

I think there is also scope for pretraining with a mask to not attempt to predict (or ignore the loss, same thing) certain things in the stream. For example to give time codes into the data stream. The training could then have an awareness of the passing of time but would not generate time codes as a prediction.
Time codes could then be injected into the context at inference time and it would be able to use that data.
When Should a Programmer Become a Manager? [video]
That's the thing. When individual issues are polled without party labels, the Democratic Party's positions are largely popular. Just like these issues, if you were to put a Republican on the Democratic ticket, that candidate will lose support.

We've seen repeatedly that Democrats going to the middle are met with supposedly moderate Republicans saying, "But not like that."
If you believe the Kremlin narrative around their motivations for the war, and I think there are a LOT of reasons to be skeptical of that narrative, but even if you believe it, the 2022 invasion plans were likely already well underway in 2020. These things are planned years in advance (Bush was already working on an Iraq invasion plan pre 9/11, for example) and once things are in motion the stakeholders are not easily turned around.
> liberal-progressive base (i.e. the core of the party)

?

I thought the core of the party is establishment centrist gerontophiles. If there was a liberal-prog core then Bernie would have been a two term president already.
Biden has passed more bipartizan legislation since LBJ.

Whatever Russia is paying to post dumb shit like this, its not worth it.
I'd prefer John Kasich over Romney, but a cross-party ticket is one of the few scenarios I can see actually getting me to the polls this time around.
rbenv is another great Ruby version manager.
I mean, deciding how to spend money is one of the core functions of a government.

> And an issue with just spending money is that we have to wait a year or two to figure out if the spent money was effective

That’s an issue with practically all legislation.
He has no appeal with Republican voters. Doesn't matter how he himself votes or that he's a member of the party.
> Consider that the alternative to reading the summary often isn't reading the entire text yourself. It's reading nothing.

But that could be actually good alternative. Sometimes its simply not worth it. You can loose more time with the tool that will give you uncertain summary.
The 429 response is sent when rate-limiting (based on IP address).

Either something is wrong with my rate-limiting code or there are many people behind a single IP address.

Anyway the limits are increased now.
Democrat leadership and large donors may have moved left, but the voters haven't. Which is why Biden was having trouble with some groups previously thought locked-in Democrat.
Obviously the overall trend I'm referring to is AI from a more general perspective. Deep learning.

You are doing exactly as I said. Focusing on obvious criticisms on the current state of the art. We know the obvious pitfalls of LLMs. It's completely obvious nowadays.

I also never pointed to an obvious path forward. I pointed to the an obvious trend that indicates whether you like it or not, we will move forward.

>It is true that LLMs appear to be an exciting technology, but it's also delusional to assume they're following a positive trendline. Performance between GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 was like a 25% improvement that took 2500% more resources to train. It's clear that there's diminishing returns to bigger and bigger models, and the trend we've been seeing in the industry is actually smaller models trained for longer periods in an effort to bring down inference costs while maintaining current performance.

AI is following a trendline. I never said specifically LLMs are exactly on this trendline. LLMs are only a part of this trendline along with other technologies and part of the overall progress deep learning is making. It is extremely likely that there will be an AI that will solve all of current issues with LLMs in the coming decades. Whether that AI is some version of an LLM remains to be seen.

>Making comparisons to Moore's law is also disengenuous because we're actually running into physical limits on how dense we can make chips due to the size of atoms themselves, so past trends for technological development may not continue to bear out.

I never made a comparison to moores law... are you replying to me or someone else? AI with the performance of a human brain is highly realizable despite physical limits because intelligence to the level of the human brain already EXISTS. The existence of humans themselves is testament to the possibility it can be done and is not a fundamental limit.
Batteries from wooden crates with newspapers, metal rods and is enough to do telegraph. That it is slightly harder ensures serious use.

If the drinking water is far away at the top of a mountain it isn't so convenient to throw your garbage in it, take a dump in it or float the dead in it.
Just out of curiosity I checked on Scholar when people started to realize and discuss that Chinese the "Belt and Road" (BNR) loan scheme was predatory and aimed at control:

https://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=belt+and+road+debt+trap&...

~2018 or so.

Then, BNR started in ~2013, which would allow for 5 years of study. Which matches up with my intuition with respect to how how research is conducted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belt_and_Road_Initiative
Most (maybe all now?) states have standard state-wide curricula. Some are painfully vague, some are painfully detailed. When I was looking at this when I got my credential, it seemed like many small-to-medium sized states copy-pasted their curricula from other states.
Inflation can be addressed when my salary goes up the same ratio as perceived inflation lol. And perceived inflation over the last two years is like 50%, and that's being conservative.
This article omits specificity of which GPT model. Re-running the experiment on the EU regulation paper using gpt-4-1106 (the current-best "intelligent" one):

https://chatgpt.com/share/d5709aeb-d24c-488b-985c-c13eba0c01...

"4. IORP Directive: The IORP (Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision) Directive is analyzed, highlighting its scope and its impact on pension funds across the EU. The paper suggests that the directive's complex regulations create inconsistencies and may need clarification or adjustment to better align with national policies."
"5. Regulatory Framework and Proposals: A significant portion of the paper is devoted to discussing potential reforms to the regulatory framework governing pensions in the EU. It proposes a dual approach: a "soft law" code for non-economic pension services and a "hard law" legislative framework for economic activities. This proposal aims to clarify and streamline EU and national regulations on pensions."

^^ these corresponds to the author's self-selected two main points.
Is it just me or did Kagi's Chrome extension get removed?
"It became necessary to destroy [democracy] to save it."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_B%E1%BA%BFn_Tre
Pardon my ignorance, I’m very much not an academic, but what the heck do the publishers bring to the table here? Suppose you just published your paper on a free site, and solicited your peer reviewers to annotate a Google Doc or whatever? I can see why journals and their publishers mattered 50 years ago when they were needed to physically publish the information by printing it on paper and distributing it. But I don’t get it now. Why does anyone gift them their papers? To me this sounds like a store where the customers bring in all the merchandise and give it to the store, who then sells it back to other customers. In other words, crazy.
Gamers Nexus is talking to one big PC manufacturer (my guess is Dell) that is seeing failure rates of 10-25% for specific SKUs: https://youtu.be/gTeubeCIwRw?t=527&si=YzpDzI2IyadzQYid

Not fully confirmed yet, but that sounds really bad. It seems like it also hits low power models like the 13900T, which would imply this isn't just a voltage issue from auto overclocking.
Alternative title:

Squarespace’s CMO asks Gen-Z to violate the Federal Labor Standards Act

> Under the FLSA, employees may not volunteer services to for-profit private sector employers.

https://webapps.dol.gov/elaws/whd/flsa/docs/volunteers.asp