skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hacking is cool. Well, gaining access to someone else's data and systems is not. Learning a system you own so thoroughly that you can find ways to make it misbehave to benefit you is. Picking your neighbor's door lock is uncool. Picking your own is cool. Manipulating a remote computer to give yourself access you shouldn't have is uncool. Manipulating your own to let you do things you're not suppose to be able to is cool.

That exploration of the edges of possibility is what make moves the world ahead. I doubt there's ever been a successful human society that praised staying inside the box.
SoftBank's last chance to be an AI superpower ended when the FTC blocked their sale of ARM to Nvidia. There's nothing SoftBank is capable of right now that their competitors can't do better.
civil unrest vs. disruption of the US congress.

neither is acceptable, one was attempting to usurp the transfer of power. the other, was to express anger with society.
But you should learn about the concept of time value of money.
Don't part with your money until you have to, due to interest.
Ah I see, carry on then!
it says i7s too in the damn title. It’s 13th and 14th gen
Changing your political party is free. I do that all the time on nearly every election cycle before reverting back to Independent again. Putting your money where your mouth is isn’t free.

We’ll find out more as more information comes out.

I’m surprised that’s the part you’re hanging your hat on. With all of the layoffs happening by the day, and the increasing political divide on non ideological basis by the reporting media, the country is becoming more and more ripe for a civil war. The people want change as well as a complete reset on the country’s priority list. Just everyone disagrees on what the changes should be and how to rank the priority list. It’s hard to see for someone on the left or the right but it’s easy to see as someone caught in the middle of it all.

I just want to end with a message to bridge the growing divide in our country both ways. Why do you think half of our country votes the opposite way that you do? Could it be they have seen things in the world that you have missed? What has the other side seen that you haven’t?
People complaining about parens/brackets in lisps have never really used structural editing. Change my mind!
We have enough problems with gratuitous DMCA notices, and there are enough bad-faith actors willing to abuse this reporting system.

Whether or not the actual content is AI-generated and defamatory is secondary.
Disruption of neural periodicity predicts clinical response after DBS for OCD
Uncorrelated returns is the key here, not inverse.
yes, he will 'want' a third term. he is owed one, due to the "Russia Russia Russia" hoax.

Just ask him. He will tell you all about it.
If it was credit based you could sell the credits upfront and the sale is complete.

Access to the system could be included or a much smaller platform fee.
Interesting. 12900k has no issues with either.
Philosophers have been giving philosophy a bad name for centuries prior to social media so there's nothing to worry about.
I’d be curious if these were predominantly mobile or desktop i9s. I have an i9 laptop that regularly runs at 100 degrees Celsius which is supposedly “safe” for these chips but it doesn’t really feel safe when it touches my skin. I’ve experienced firsthand many laptops with thermal issues and just wonder if Intel is spec’ing these too high to win benchmark wars at the cost of stability.

Although if it’s just Warframe crashing perhaps the software itself isn’t well optimized for Intel’s big/little core setup on the newer 13th and 14th generation chips (performance and efficiency cores - supposed to be handled by the OS but with gaming all bets are off)
How does Glicol differ from Supercollider (https://github.com/supercollider/supercollider)?
In at least this case, sf.gov confirms the existence of the agency[1], and has a page linking to sfdec.org[2][3]. So, it most likely really is just government agencies being bad at domains here.

[1]: https://www.sf.gov/news/san-francisco-launches-new-departmen...

[2]: https://www.sf.gov/departments/child-care-health-program-cch...

[3]: https://provider.sfdec.org/ (linked as "Department of Early Childhood Provider Portal" in [2])
When you press "View on GitHub," it goes to his repository. When copying multiple scripts, it gives a popup to support his project. Above all, my website is open source. There's no dishonesty here. I just "repackaged" his project into a more modern, easier-to-maintain website. The scripts the community creates for his repo are all MIT licensed. So, my question is, how is it dishonest to improve an MIT project?

GitHub repo: https://github.com/BramSuurdje/proxmox-helper-scripts
> crude oil barrels are 47 gallons (159 L)

I think you meant 42 gallons.
Wonder no more; there's been a few attempts. Here's some from a quick HN search: Hummingbird (https://www.hummingbirdnotation.com/), Clairnote (https://clairnote.org/), and a thread with experimental music notation resources (https://llllllll.co/t/experimental-music-notation-resources/...)
I've written BT software[0], and it always randomizes it. I don't think it randomizes for every transaction, but it does use different UUIDs, when I run the device at different times. You can't switch the UUID, after establishing a connection.

[0] https://riftvalleysoftware.com/work/ios-apps/bluevanclef/
> the transaction is supposedly something like “old person has added value all their life and now receives some return on investment”

What you're describing isn't really a transaction though? This dynamic can only exist from family and other longer term personal relationships.
I completely agree, I think even in some cases eventually AI should be combined with a basic algorithm, for example chatGPT sometimes gives wrong math answers, which makes sense because it is just generating what it "says" based on it's data. If it could take the equation it finds though and plug it into a simple calculator algorithm then the answer would be correct. Just simple example, but you know what I mean..
It's different for everyone, but I don't stumble across tools that save an hour or two that often.

In fact, excluding the very well known tools (e.g. LLMs) I think I've found maybe 3 in my career and I only use one of them sporadically (a $20 one-time Excel add-in). The other two cost 4-5 figures and were provided by my employer at the time.
How do you envision pushing/reviewing a branch of 3 cleanly separated commits (say: write failing test, fix code, refactor) into a repo with a fast-forward/no-merge policy? The end result should of course be 3 commits, but review history should not be lost.

1) push 3 commits (author)

2) push 3 commits + 1 review commit (reviewer)

or even 2a), + 3 interleaved review commits, might be needed if the final refactor removes something.

then

3a) force-push 3 commits with the review comments applied (you mentioned --force is supported)

3b) or push 3 + 1 + (worst case 3) fixup commits, then a squash later?

If 3a), does pico have the concept of patchsets like gerrit, so the state 2) can be retrieved later?

PS: ... or even 2c, if the line I am commenting on is removed in patch 2 I would need to push a whole "review tree" (or fix conflicts in b and c):

a -- b -- c -- review-c
\ \
\ `-review-b
`- review-a
Haskell uses \ which is nice, it's an ASCII character that looks like the right half of λ
The accumulation of wasted man-hours for developers and users. Without the allure of "free", I believe there would have been ample competition for more user friendly paid software doing what Linux is used for now. With the bonus that the developers would have been paid for their work and that tech giants would have to pay for their tech rather than use unpaid labour for free. (I know some of them also contribute to open source)
The lifetime deals that work out, are worth it.

Hitting a bet on the appsumo startup casino can be fun.

I have a few tools quietly that have remained lifetime, like brain.fm.

Supporting what you think will win, early is a risk and an opportunity.
React-dom/server APIs are great for this. Writing jsx (as opposed to template literals as in OP) is generally a nicer DX, and you can keep the setup fairly minimal.
Well, he wanted to put his shoes on. Priorities!
UTM SE is specifically a no-JIT version.

And I actually do have evidence for my conspiracy theory: iDOS 2. Apple was perfectly fine with it up until someone in tech media posted a guide on how to run ancient versions of Windows on it, then they pulled the app.

Furthermore, "fingers shall not touch mouse apps" was a Jobs decree. It's specifically the reason why Apple got into touch UI. Jobs designed the iPad out of spite due to a friend of his who was on the Windows tablet team around the turn of the millennium. Jobs was so angry that they were just putting Windows on a tablet - and handing people styluses to work around the small touch targets on XP - that he made Apple design a tablet computer demo around finger-only UI. That was then grafted onto the Purple project (which at that point was a clickwheel iPod with a phone modem in it) and we got the iPhone.

So my suspicion is that Apple has an internal "things which make Jobs spin in his grave" list that they would never allow, come hell, high water, or the European Union's antitrust regulators.
New Old Stock OS/2 Version 2 – By Bradford Morgan White
It's pretty common to wire \ to the lambda character in your editor. I think racket already allows this (if not as a replacement for lambda, an alternative syntax for it)
Exactly. There's open collusion between the DHS, other government organs, and these major platforms.

The veil has been pierced. There is no difference between either YouTube or the US government directly censoring you.
> There's no whimsy, no sense of artistry or creativity or mystery or playfulness. You have a canvas to do anything and you choose to do nothing.

This is all well and good but it should come after being able to load a page quickly that's accessible over a slow connection and isn't wasteful of metered connections.
Muscle machine: How water controls the speed of muscle contraction
This article is quite old and has been submitted probably every year since it's published with past submissions well into double pages.

For modern version and systematic treatment of the subject check out this book by Spafford:

Cybersecurity Myths and Misconceptions: Avoiding the Hazards and Pitfalls that Derail:

https://www.pearson.com/en-us/subject-catalog/p/cybersecurit...
My friend is a tax accountant. I hope I am wrong, but I am worried for her entire profession. It seems more about memorization of the massive & enormously complex tax code, and less about actual problem solving. This seems very well suited to an AI. I suspect such professions will be decimated in the near future.
Why Do Developers Need Blocked-Out Time?
It feels like intel simply pushed the clock rates too close to the edge to keep up with competition. These cpus are very poor over clockers. No margins at all. Add a hot summer day (northern hemisphere), some SSE2 instructions that seem to really push cpus to the edge and a less than perfect heat sink mount and you’ve got a crash.
There is this: https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-119/srfi-119.html
Thank you for that link.

There are many flaws in the paper's approach. There is much literature on this already, it has been investigated for decades. Much of the fingerprinting used comes from non-linearities in the RF power amplifiers, not the frequency.
Zettelkasten changed everything for me, I didn't hear about it until my early 40's myself. I also had no idea you weren't just supposed to be summarizing verbatim.

It did take a huge amount of effort to go through the conversion process of my notes, but now it makes things much easier and works how my mind works to link concepts and ideas.
I just slack myself notes of things I am trying to process that are more in depth. It helps me rebuild context, and those notes are usuallu short lived (usually a day or a week depending on difficulty of task)
I love all these attempts because I read the introductions nodding my head in agreement—yes traditional notation is annoying, yes we can use software to make better notations, yes it should be intuitive—and then I get to their actual proposal and it's just as inscrutible as traditional notation, and, often, uglier.
Yikes. Stupid phone thinks it can spell better than me. Fixed. Thanks.
My impression though i that most of these firms are highly correlated with the market despite their attempts at otherwise
What are “hyper-growth strategies”?
what's the purpose of this? is it one of those 'fun' problems to solve?
I create Web Datasets without any JavaScript and 99% test coverage... written in
Using Jakarta EE, Jakarta Faces, PrimeFaces, OmniFaces and put it all together with JPAFinder and JPALazyDataModel from FlowLogix.
Tests using TestContainers with Arquillian/Graphene and Selenium.

Very few lines of code or setup required. Developer productivity at its finest
Could also be Singapore, Beijing or Tokyo.
Yes, I believe all of those services have gift cards in stores.
Accounting Solver AI
Depends. If a year is $50, and a month is $5, then you save $10 (16.7%). That's probably more than I'd make in interest.

My time is valuable, too. Every second not spent deleting reminder texts, is a second I can use for other stuff.
Apart from being a personal cache for your thoughts, it also catches you from going down rabbit holes.

Keeping a log like this is one kind of guard.

I've had to come up with my own set of tricks while working alone [0] but in general I think it helps to be a defensive developer.

[0] https://www.idiotlamborghini.com/articles/mastering_focus_as...
Whenever the topic of index funds come up, people should remember:

1. The benchmark for hedge funds is not the sp500, it’s the bond market

2. Because the sp500 is inherently a bet, that America’s top few companies will perform well. This is not a purely risk free, hands off bet.

If you bought the Japanese Index fund, the Nikkei, even today it hasn’t returned to its 1980 peak

You might say “I’ll just get a global index”- in which case congrats, you’ve underperformed hedge funds!

3. There are more factors than just investment returns- ie volatility (Sharpe), drawdowns, etc

So despite what HN seems to think, the hedge fund industry is not in fact, full of idiots.
People seem to be obsessed with finding fundamental properties in neural networks, but why not simply marvel at the more basic incredible operations of addition and multiplication, and stop there?
The Kolmogorov Complexity book is obviously brilliant but I've never made it more than two pages before falling asleep.
If you review PRs as whole, you don't need to use the web interface. I think it only gets harder when you want to do inline comments. At least that's what the docs for github cli suggest. https://cli.github.com/manual/gh_pr_review

It does seem like it would be hard to support inline comments properly outside of an email quoting context without editor integration.
Interested in how it performed vs basic index funds?
> At the close of the war, he [Shannon] prepared a classified memorandum for Bell Telephone Labs entitled "A Mathematical Theory of Cryptography", dated September 1945. A declassified version of this paper was published in 1949 as "Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems" in the Bell System Technical Journal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_Theory_of_Secrec...

> what societal changes happened as a result of engineering the Bell system specifically

I don't have that much time, but in general think about how I am even capable of communicating with you at all. Start with the "https://" at the beginning of most modern URLs.

UNIX, transistors, foundational information theory, "on and on till the break of dawn." If you want to become more familiar with Shannon's work and Bell systems, separately and together, try his master's thesis, followed by his Ph.D., ...

> obviously

I thought my original comment was obvious. At least we both seem to be familiar with the principles of:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Graham_(programmer)#/medi...

Thank you for for helping me clarify my thoughts, and have a nice day.
Revisiting Rocket Lab and Neutron
I believe choice two covers your implications. Not having a smartphone greatly impacts daily life and would make earning a living more of a challenge too. My argument is not that people shouldn't use these apps/devices, it is that because they are integral to daily life it shouldn't be allowed to abuse the user's privacy. In essence, people are given a false 'choice' which is just insult to injury and gives legal cover for abusing someone's privacy.
Errors as Values are the Future [video]
Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces it collectively
those worlds compete for mindshare

people don't consistently enter the same market for less compensation when given the choice
I don't think one even needs "supernatural" explanations.

1. Consider the base hardware of each agent:

http://neuropathologyblog.blogspot.com/2017/06/shannon-curra...

2. Consider that (according to science anyways) there is no central broadcaster of reality (it is at least plausible)

3. Consider each agent (often/usually) "knows" all of reality, or at least any point you query them about (for sure: all agents claim to know the unknowable, regularly; I have yet to encounter one who can stop a "powerful" invocation of #3 (or even try: the option seems literally unavailable), though minor ones can be overridden fairly trivially (I can think of two contrasting paths of interesting consideration based on this detail, one of them being extremely optimistic, and trivially plausible))

Simplified: what is known to be, is (locally).

4. Consider the possibility (or assume as a premise of a thought experiment) that reality and the universe are not exactly the very same thing ("it exists outside of spacetime"), though it may appear that they are (see #3)

Is it not fairly straightforward what is going on?

A big part of the problem is that #3 is ~inevitably[1] invoked if such things are analyzed, screwing up the analysis, thus rendering the theory necessarily "false" (it "is" false...though, it will typically not be asserted as such explicitly, and direct questions will be ignored/dodged).

[1] which is...weird (the inevitable part...like, it is as if consciousness is ~hardwired to disallow certain inspection (highly predictable evasive actions are invoked in response), something which can easily be tested/demonstrated).
Are not wrong about MA rotaries. The Concord rotary on Rt 2 was exciting before they rebuilt it. The junction of 2a into the rotary still is exciting.
The fact they are mispriced then not mispriced at a later time is almost the entirety of the reason one has the potential to make better than average returns.
No, it doesn't. It requires root, and that breaks all the apps.
Using AI, specifically Large Language Models (LLMs), for stock trading is a terrible idea for several reasons. Firstly, LLMs are not designed for real-time data analysis. Stock trading requires immediate response to market trends, news, and financial indicators, which LLMs are not equipped to handle. They excel at processing and generating human language but lack the capability for the rapid and continuous data analysis needed in stock trading.

Secondly, LLMs lack predictive accuracy. Stock trading relies on complex financial models and quantitative analysis that consider a multitude of factors like economic indicators, political events, and market sentiment. LLMs are trained on historical data and textual information, and they do not adapt well to new, unforeseen events that can significantly impact stock prices. Moreover, stock trading algorithms must ensure compliance with strict financial regulations, which LLMs cannot guarantee. Therefore, more specialized AI models are necessary for effective and reliable stock trading.
I don't think most of us think the hedge fund industry is full of idiots. Speaking only for myself, I think it's mostly full of grifters.
What if robots could communicate with humans by emitting scents?
Appreciate the concern, but it was easy enough to zoom the map onto an empty part of the ocean and conceal any personal info.
> #4) Hacking is Cool

Hacking is cool. Why the security theater industry has appropriated "hacking" to mean accessing other people's systems without authorization, I don't know.
> Mostly no cameras.

It's interesting to hear this from others. Years ago I would have expected that camera-on meetings would be more productive on average, but my own experience is the opposite. I have only worked at a few remote companies but the places where cameras mostly weren't used had far far less wasted meeting time.
You're being pedantic about verbiage. They have every right to accept payment from other companies in order to arrange RGB values on their website that may inform you about products from that paying company. Is that better?
There's a lot to unpack here, such as your wife getting mad AT YOU for something outside of your control. That's not a tech problem.

I will say that every bulb and switch I have replaced with a Hue stuff is in a box in my garage. I didn't just throw them all away. If I ever reach a point where I'm done with the product I can just pull the old bulbs and switches and be back in action in 30 minutes. No biggie.

I set up two automations that my family adores. There's a plex webhook that dims/raises the lights just like a movie theater when we play something. In my daughters room, I set up an IR wand to "cast a spell" that dims her lights and plays her stories at bedtime.

Took a non-trivial amount of troubleshooting time to get working, but I'm happy to do it because I have the skills to do it and it's memorable for the family. What's a better use of my ability to work with terrible technology than making my family's life a little nicer?
US Courts to Decide If NFTs Are Securities as DraftKings Case Goes to Trial
Based on the lack of upvotes on the comment, I guess I'm also too stupid to understand why "cloud" is better than "not cloud".
If the prices were comparable id take the non ai one because the manufacturing cost probably went into better materials
If you're going to start holding companies accountable for wasting people's time then AT&T has a lot more to answer for than this one little event.