skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
ZeroMQ was followed by nanomsg (https://nanomsg.org/) and nng (https://nng.nanomsg.org/)

Some of Martin's rationale here:

https://250bpm.com/blog:23/index.html

ZeroMQ is still widely used and popular, but I am not sure if it is still actively developed.
If the FS implements snapshots "down low" you get COW efficient, and pretty much lock-free atomic "it's done" -if you run userspace "get me the difference" then it has all kinds of runtime costs and risks.

That said, rsync is pretty good.

Your J model can't get more memory. And you look to be right, its the OS it comes with and thats it. The NAS you have is the best NAS sometimes. It's all very well positing better ones, but they aren't the one you have: So make the most of it.
This is exactly why a visual representation of code can be useful for analyzing certain things, but will rarely be the best (or even preferred) way to write code.

I think a happy medium would be an environment where you could easily switch between "code" and "visual" view, and maybe even make changes within each, but I suspect developers will stick with "code" view most of the time.

Also, from the article:
> Developers say they want "visual programming"

I certainly don't. What I do want is an IDE which has a better view into my entire project, including all the files, images, DB, etc., so it can make much better informed suggestions. Kind of like JetBrains on steroids, but with better built-in error checking and autocomplete suggestions. I want the ability to move a chunk of code somewhere else, and have the IDE warn me (or even fix the problem) when the code I move now references out-of-scope variables. In short, I want the IDE to handle most of the grunt work, so I can concentrate on the bigger picture.
I don’t entirely agree with the author’s viewpoint on “Hacking is Cool.” There was a time when I thought similarly, believing that “finding some system vulnerabilities is just like helping those system programmers find bugs, and I can never be better than those programmers.” However, I gradually rejected this idea. The appeal of cybersecurity lies in its “breadth” rather than its “depth.” In a specific area, a hacker might never be as proficient as a programmer, but hackers often possess a broad knowledge base across various fields.

A web security researcher might simultaneously discover vulnerabilities in “PHP, JSP, Servlet, ASP.NET, IIS, and Tomcat.” A binary researcher might have knowledge of “Windows, Android, and iOS.” A network protocol researcher might be well-versed in “TCP/IP, HTTP, and FTP” protocols. More likely, a hacker often masters all these basic knowledge areas.

So, what I want to say is that the key is not the technology itself, nor the nitty-gritty of offense and defense in some vulnerabilities, but rather the ability to use the wide range of knowledge and the hacker’s reverse thinking to challenge seemingly sound systems. This is what our society needs and it is immensely enjoyable.
Some are bad but Blueprints is great. Main issue is they don't always play nice with text based coding tools.
Aliases you can discard are ad blockers for emails, disposable services are for bots, scams, and fraud. If you know the space, you'll be aware CAPTCHAs are trivially defeated today, regardless of the provider.

I certainly agree people shouldn't be asked to provide an email if it's unnecessary, but again for the issue of bots, scams, and fraud, you generally need some sort of unique relatively hard to get many of identifier to prevent people making tons of accounts on any service which either allows posting content or costs money to provide service. Email is generally okay for this.

Ultimately disposable email providers who continue to believe domain rotation is anything but an attack will force a far worse outcome, which I've already seen some major sites do: Only accept registration from Gmail, Outlook, and Yahoo accounts. (The Verge is one example where I know I had to register with a Gmail account and open a support ticket to change my email to my real email because they figured out the best way to avoid abusers on disposable email was to allowlist major providers.)
Science is good, but it probably won't tell you how to fix your sleep. Especially not a book which is highly generalized. Experiment, experiment, experiment. Nerd the hell out. That probably means reading papers, but it also means trying out stuff like breathing exercises, meditation, yoga nidra, etc. It might even mean transforming your entire life and worldview. Attempting to find the most accurate scientific book on a subject is laudable in some respects, but also a severely limited approach if that's all you're doing. I wish you well on your journey.
As jampekka put it, text isn't trying to use spatial abstractions, it's using the (arguably more powerful) abstraction of named values/computations. Hard to think about? Yes, there's a learning curve to say the least. But it seems to be worth it for a lot of cases.
So I agree that this can have some bad economic side effects, especially as the (larger) previous generation ages, but otherwise I don't really see this as a bad thing (though I guess that's a pretty big "otherwise"). Humanity doesn't have to be like venture-backed startups, where growth is the only way to survive.

I'm not a doomsayer that believes that there are way too many of us for the planet to support (IMO we're just bad at distributing resources equitably), but I can't help but assume that fewer people here and there will create less pressure on natural ecosystems.

Certainly it would be bad if the population kept shrinking down to nothing (well, bad for humans, anyway), but I don't think some ups and downs here and there should be cause for much alarm.

Regardless, though, they're talking about having 200M fewer people than expected in 2100, with a total population of 10.2B. Is 2% really going to be that noticeable? And the actual population drop (from 10.3B in 2080 to 10.2B in 2100) they're talking about is only 100M people, or about 1%.
>Multiplication and addition are more fundamental than neural networks.

Time and complexity are not related, just acquaintances.
> 10% long-term capital gains

That is not the long-term capital gains rate in the US.
I really like the idea of Nextcloud, but I don't quite trust anything self hosted to have Google's level of availability.

I don't think I'd want to build a workflow that has a hard dependency on a DIY server, or anything that would take more than a half hour to set up from scratch if it breaks during some big project.

That's a super interesting idea to have off-site backups at a friend or relative's house. Seems like it could be a pretty good use case for SyncThing's untrusted nodes[1], because then you wouldn't have to deal with any network config stuff.

Borg is what I'm currently using to back up to a USB drive and it definitely seems to be top notch(Besides me breaking it one time by accidentally installing a global pip package, because Linux distros are insane and use a global python environment...).

[1]: https://docs.syncthing.net/users/untrusted.html
> By 2100, Europe’s population is set to shrink by 21 per cent from its peak in 2020, marking the largest decline of any continent.

That’s a big shift.
Thats not what I said though, or at least not what I meant. Id be happy to explain further but its clear ur not really interested.
There's a fantastic service called the internet, which helps with things you don't know about. According to Google, 5 feet is roughly 1.5 meters. That means that the ground is frozen solid on average 1.5 meters below surface level in winter. However much thermal capacity your walls have, it won't be long before your attempt at heating or cooling your living space is competing directly with the outside environment. It is less of a concern in summer, since the difference between inside and outside is much smaller, but critical for energy usage in winter.

As for mold and mildew, you only get that with modern insulation if you have a poor envelope- i.e. drafts in the walls due to improper sealing. It's not the sort of thing drier climates have to worry about at all, but in very humid environments such as where I live, preventing condensation inside is important. That means not having walls that are cooler than the dew point of the air getting inside.

Basements here are very prone to getting mold or mildew, because (a) they have solid walls, (b) are kept cool via the earth acting as a heat bank, and (c) will readily absorb moisture through the stone or cement.

Most around here have some sort of sealant paint or active dehumidification running in summer to avoid mildew. If the basement walls didn't have to be load bearing, solid wall construction would absolutely be the last choice for basements because they're definitely the worst for thermal and moisture resistance properties.
The downside of using modern metrics to estimate the happiness of past people is that you won't ever measure the stuff that we've lost. We'll never really know, and you should look at all such comparisons with deep suspicion (especially eyeballing you, Steven Pinker)
Seems more likely you don’t process sarcasm well.
Celery Flower TUI doesn't yet support Kafka in Python, though Kombu (the protocol wrapper for celery) does. It looks like Kaskade has non-kombu support for consumers and ?
https://github.com/celery/celery/issues/7674#issuecomment-12... .. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40842365

(Edit)

Kaskade models.py, consumer.py
https://github.com/sauljabin/kaskade/blob/main/kaskade/model...

kombu/transport/confluentkafka.py:
https://github.com/celery/kombu/blob/main/kombu/transport/co...

confluent-kafka-python wraps librdkafka with binary wheels: https://github.com/confluentinc/confluent-kafka-python

librdkafka: https://github.com/edenhill/librdkafka
I'm glad you're not in charge of anything important for the rest of us then.
You might be interested in:

https://schematix.com/video/depmap

I'm the founder. It's a tool for interacting with deployment diagrams like you mentioned in your article.

We have customers who also model state machines and generate code from the diagrams.
How is AdS/CFT (as it pertains to describing spacetime & the Standard Model) within reach of experiment? We're not even in an AdS universe.
I want to create a company that is like Apple of the 90's and resurrect the "bicycle for the mind". Is there any chance you would consider mentoring?
Fwiw, you should able to answer #1 and #2 without hitting the main db if you've got good observability into your system.
I dunno if this is the correct way of thinking about it, but I just imagine it as a particle that has mass but does not interact with other particles (except at big-bang like energy levels?). So essentially a galaxy would be full of these particles zipping around never colliding with anything. And over time, some/most of these particles would have stable orbits (as the ones in unstable orbits would have flown off by now) around the galactic core. And to an observer, it would look like a gravitational tractor ahead of the rest of the physical mass of the galaxy (which is slower because it is affected by things like friction and collisions?). And so you'd see galaxies where the arms are spinning faster than they should be?
Tech? Corporations? Movies and TV? Academia? Jouralism? You have a massive blindside.
Is there any writer who criticizes Marx on his own terms?

Marx agreed that quality of life can improve under capitalism. The whole point was a ethical/social critique of mismatched incentives and power imbalances of such an arrangement.

It doesn't matter if life improves if the only choices one has in life is either live under the power imbalance of wage labor or extract value from those who do.

If folks can be blamed for commenting completely off-base takes on an article they didn't read, the author should also take heat for critiquing on a work they never read.
But it's secretly also a quirky Lisp, to quote Andreas himself.
Yeah, turns out it was flagged that long because dang got a day off. The first I've ever heard of it tbh
There were a couple of green accounts spamming comments like that, taking them seriously as part of the normal HN community is disingenuous, as this sort of incident is bound to attract trolls looking to stir the pot.
>Like what exactly

Most stipulations basically requiring to be highly educated and experienced already. If you don't have those, you need to have some Japanese proficiency.

If you are in one of those categories, the work visa is relatively lax if we're comparing to the process to immigrate into the US or UK. Only real issue is their economy isn't doing great right now, so you'll find it harder than normal to find roles hiring unless you're extremely specialized (so, no different from the US right now).

> And what's wrong with focusing on skilled workers?

Same thing that's happening in tech as we speak. You only look for Purple Squirrels and you may as well not have a job ad. Meanwhile, most squirrels aren't moving abroad to a country to take a huge pay cut unless they are very satisfied with their savings/stock.
Approximating the Sierpinski Triangle on My CNC
I didn't know at first and it was hell as when I first delved into this I thought it would be a simple task as it would be some agreed upon standard like JSON behind the scenes, but from what I understood emails were created a long time ago and some providers did things differently.

The majority of the work was done through testing lots of emails and I must have sent at least a thousands emails to myself from different providers and sites.

I've deleted the bookmarks in an attempt to reduce the PTSD it caused, but I think the main one I visited was RFC 1341 as I had some difficulties understanding the boundaries and encoding.

What was really tricky is getting it to work with all the different types as some emails didn't have boundaries while others had them, some were encoded entirely in base64, some partially, some of them were just plaintext, others were HTML while some were mixed or even offered multiple versions depending on what the email client supported.

Best thing is honestly to try it out and just pick a random address and send a really tricky email to it, would love to see you break the parser and telling me so I can improve it.
1. It's normal in the tech industry to own a lot of stock in the company you work for. Investing in a vendor (in Nvidia's case) or another adjacent company is lower risk. You cannot avoid risk in investing, it's a natural part of the situation.

2. You can avoid the sell low situation by having 3-6 months of expenses saved in an emergency savings account. With all the layoffs in the last few years everyone should have gotten the message to do this. Even in a large downturn six months of expenses in a savings account is enough for you to re-skill and find new employment.
Ah. In my state, California, the passing lane rule only applies if you're not already going the speed limit or if there is traffic congestion, the normal speed of traffic. If you're going the speed limit, you are under no obligation to get out of the left lane just because someone behind you wants to speed. Regardless though you're supposed to move right if you're moving slower than the lane to your right.

It appears that Illinois law also has an exception for traffic congestion, but not for speed limits.
No but I have promised myself a $30 tip for good performance. It was surprisingly motivating.
I've used zeromq, nanomsg, and nng. The differences are subtle and focused on native library support, background threading model, and other systems level things.

All of them are based on specs that are widely published. I've had zero problems implementing real robotic systems in nng, zmq, etc.

And it is so damn easy to use it's amazing to me the whole world doesn't use it.
A former sniper would also have a few hundred to a few thousand hours more range time than a random member of the public. I wouldn't doubt that "easy" for someone like that would have a much different meaning than for everyone else.
If an algorithmic process is an experience and a collection of experiences is intelligence then we get some pretty wild conclusions that I don't think most people would be attempting to claim as it'd make them sound like a lunatic (or a hippy).

Consider the (algorithmic) mechanical process of screwing in a screw into a board. This screw has an "experience" and therefore intelligence. So... The screw is intelligent? Very low intelligence, but intelligent according to this definition.

But we have an even bigger problem. There's the metaset of experiences, that's the collection of several screws (or the screw, board, and screwdriver together). So we now have a meta intelligence! And we have several because there's the different operations on these sets to perform.

You might be okay with this or maybe you're saying it needs memory. If the later you hopefully quickly realize this means a classic computer is intelligent but due to the many ways information can be stored it does not solve our above conundrum.

So we must then come to the conclusion that all things AND any set of things have intelligence. Which kinda makes the whole discussion meaningless. Or, we must need a more refined definition of intelligence which more closely reflects what people actually are trying to convey when they use this word.
In Russian words parentheses, brackets and braces are represented by the same word with modifier (round, square, figure, etc)
I always have problem when speaking English because can’t remember which one is which.
This can be really tricky to do. I reached the limit of my brain's working capacity designing a priority inheritance system, and sketched the state machine out in a dot file, visualized with graphviz - this worked really well for reasoning through the correctness of the algorithm and explaining it to others. I tried to structure the implementation code to match it and I was able to get pretty close; but the actual states were a bunch of bit-packing and duplicated control flow to get optimal assembly output for the hottest paths. Each one of those changes was easy to reason about as an isolated correct transformation of the original structure in code, but would have been a mess visually.
> Really this is all Instagram's fault. The platform, which has always prioritized aesthetics, is now more than ever prioritizing short, easily loopable clips of beauty. There are few "hooks" more engaging than those that claim to have made a great deal of money in a short period of time, which is why the Stan store screenshots work so well. A part of me is curious whether the app's latest policy update cracking down on reposts will affect the Faceless Account trend, or if perhaps the "10 Irresistible Hook Ideas To Make A Lot Of Money Really Fast" text overlaid on top will qualify the stock videos as original.

Like always, takes like this that are quick to draw a conclusion the reader likes to read are full of bs. This is not IG's fault, and it's not a problem to begin with which requires putting the blame on anybody.

It's simple: People have started to be more careful about their privacy. And given the lifestyle photos these influencers share with their followers, it only makes sense to remain anonymous unless they're ok with having to deal with stalker problems, etc.
How did Apple screw them over twice?
https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/

The US commercial environment experienced a bit of a step change in 1971 - and, realistically, probably a lead up of pressure before that date.

A bit of systems thinking and it is probably not fair to say he is "the main reason". He was the first executive who figured out how to get best results in what at the time would have been a poorly understood new regulatory world that rewarded of financialisation.
I was curious, so I went the Wikipedia page, and it says[0]:

Not the least of these challenges was his unfamiliarity with the Cincinnati political scene, as he had never resided in or near the city, having grown up in the Cleveland area and attending college in central Ohio. The Post fired Watterson before his contract was up.

That passage cites an interview with Watterson[1] as its only source. The source material:

Watterson: I didn't hit the ground running. Cincinnati at that time was also beginning to realize it had major cartooning talent in Jim Borgman, at the city's other paper, and I didn't benefit from the comparison.

Christie: I'm not familiar...

Watterson: He's syndicated through King Features, and had been for a couple years by the time I arrived in Cincinnati. This is an odd story. Borgman graduated from Kenyon Collage the year before I went there, and it was his example that inspired me to pursue political cartooning. He had drawn cartoons at Kenyon, and landed his job at the Cincinnati Enquirer right after graduation. His footsteps seemed like good ones to follow, so I cultivated an interest in politics, and Borgman helped me a lot in learning how to construct an editorial cartoon. Neither of us dreamed I'd end up in the same town on the opposite paper. I don't know to what extent the comparison played a role in my editor's not liking my work, but I was very intimidated by working on a major city paper and I didn't feel free to experiment, really, or to travel down my own path. I very early caught on that the editor had something specific in mind that he was looking for, and I tried to accommodate him in order to get published. His idea was that he was going to publish only my very best work so that I wouldn't embarress the newspaper while I learned the ropes. As sound as that idea may be from the management standpoint, it was disastrous for me because I was only getting a couple cartoons a week printed. I would turn out rough idea after rough idea, and he would veto eighty percent of them. As a result I lost all my self-confidence, and his intervention was really unhealthy, i think, as far as letting me experiment and make mistakes, and become a stronger cartoonist for it. Obviously, if he wanted a more experienced cartoonist, he shouldn't have hired a kid just out of college. I pretty much prostituted myself for six months but I couldn't please him, so he sent me packing.

One should take content on Wikipedia with a grain of salt.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Watterson#Early_work

[1]: https://web.archive.org/web/20060212121427/http://home3.inet...
Is this platform only for people in the Bay Area or for people outside?
PCSX2 2.0 Released
Algorithms are graphs, data structures are graphs, networks are graphs, relationships are graphs.

Let’s use text to describe everything!
> What the GUI can never do well is work with things outside the CWD

This I believe you. (My idea of operating system design does not have directory structures, though.)

> Honestly I don’t see there’s any reason we don’t introduce both modes to every user.

I think it is a good idea, although good documentation will help with both modes.

> but until GUI frameworks are scriptable by default, with some embedded scripting language (don’t care which) that’s ubiquitously present in every window even if the writer of the app knows nothing about it

My idea of operating system design involves: Although the GUI windows themself do not have a scripting language, command-line windows use a scripting language called "Command, Automation, and Query Language", and can interact with all windows in the system, even if the writer of the app knows nothing about it (although if they do know about it, that can help too). (The combination of the widget library with the security model of the operating system also has a side effect of allowing GUI interactions to be recorded as well.)

> My guess is the work necessary to make CLIs more ergonomic is smaller than the work needed to make GUIs more scriptable, but I could be wrong.

I don't know, although it is helpful to do both, since CLIs and GUIs are both useful.
I imagine that assumes we can find large new deposits to meet increasing demand. That's not happening with copper. The deposit in this article is an exception.