skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Just Use MSYS2 You Say?
> Lol very useful for an online comment thread

I don't know why you're loling. Do you expect me to paste the entire file contents into this comment thread?

If you're a Mac user, then you can easily see the file on your own Mac. My blog post was written for Mac users. And the WebKit blog post was written for Apple Safari users on Mac and iPhone.

In any case, you already said "I'll take your word for it that utm isn't on there specifically", so I don't know why this particular detail needs further debate.
MP3 tags are not there just to being pretty.

Also, if any, an external JSON file should be parsed, not the files themselves.

In my country, no one of these 'self-called engineers' wouldn't even earn a trade/vocational degree.
Legally they wouldn't even be engineers.
Many books have invalid/duplicate ISBN.

Amazon have problem keeping track of them. Smaller book store usually can handle without problem.
I don't think this is a convincing argument. Bro management has been saying stuff like this for decades, you can just outsource everything to a cheap country, external partner, or etc. Needless to say we all know how this operation ends every time.
A bit ironic how the evolution of technology and user preferences can come full circle
I'm asking what it's called
Software Maker Gitlab Seen Exploring Sale. Datadog, Google Among Suitors?
Testing and Evaluating Large Language Models in AI Applications
I'm not an expert, but I was once told that in many jurisdictions banks etc. have so many "Vice Presidents" because it's essentially part of legal requirements for some of the tasks the VPs do - sometimes you literally need someone who is, at least on paper (and thus Responsible) appropriately high in management structure.

Personally I once needed[1] to have private, personal bank account opening, vetted officially "by board of the bank", but probably through similar council of seemingly overinflated job titles, but whose job titles included appropriate legal responsibility for the action taken.

[1] Run of the mill personnel could not even get answer why, ultimately it turned out due to various legal requirements someone with high job title had to sign off on "We know this customer and verified they are so and so"
I am curious what browser / os are you using.
At least you have kids… We only have an empty hole in the ground covered by a sheet of tarpaulin, but it’s a house to us!
He's seen all the specialists. I think they ultimately came down on neurological damage, and tried a battery of drugs until they found some that slightly mitigated the problem. Last we talked about it, though, it hasn't been fully resolved.
I'd dispute that in the UK at least, I think most people of a nerdy disposition tend to at least be aware of the films.
What is GPU kernel module? Is it something like a driver for GPU?
It is insane. But it leaves the question: why are companies doing it? They must believe it’s working for them, or they’d change it. God knows companies are motivated to hire good people. Maybe someone in HR or even a technical manager in one of these companies can answer: on what theory are these processes believed to be effective?
Faker is a well-known and powerful library for generating fake data. It provides a wide range of random but realistic-looking data generators. However, testing with purely random data can be risky, which is why property-based testing is valuable. While using fake but realistic data in tests can be beneficial, it is essential to integrate it properly. fast-check offers a robust solution for this integration.
That's every OSS product, though. It's like with Git - theoretically, the system is designed around a mesh topology, where there's an amorphous blob of clones exchanging patches, without any designated special repo; in practice, everyone pulls from and pushes to a designated "origin", creating a tree in which the root owns the canonical version of the source code. Same with any OSS project - there's always one designated organization or group that holds the moral, legal, and/or assumed right to project identity, which includes both the name and the source code.

Simple proof: fork any OSS project you like, make some changes, and start promoting it under the same name. See how long you'll last before first accusations of theft roll in.

OSS is a strange beast - the source code itself isn't something scarce you can make money off, but the identity of a project and associated reputation very much is. Which gives you the "first party"/"third party" developer split, regardless of whether the payment is in dollars or (with most OSS) just Internet clout.
It seems this was made public only very recently, my bad.

> On June 25, 2024, Dr Disrespect confirmed that the reason for his Twitch ban was a result of him sending DMs to a minor through Twitch whispers, and that the ban served in 2020 was a result of those actions.
Anonymization: The imperfect science of using data while preserving privacy
[zrok](https://zrok.io/), an alternative to ngrok does access management too. It's like tailscale but can give access to a specific service.
I've only tried it on my M1, running Llama-3 via Ollama. It works, but it's slow to the point where it's not really usable. Maybe there are smaller models you can run that will perform better.
It is not "decision based solely on automated processing",
it is an underpaid human mindlessly clicking on preset buttons.
The premise where these are readily available for mass purchase, have a hardware and software stack that already works reliably, and have a lower energy footprint than other offerings

and somewhat competitive on cost, but that wont be the main selling point, just availability
That's why I hate DKMS. A true libre kernel would never need to use that.
It’s not a secret HN is not a site for general news. That’s the first item in the guidelines:

> What to Submit

> (…)

> Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

It is because you’d hear about that anywhere and everywhere else that it doesn’t belong here. Would you complain that a forum about cooking or sharing wallpapers didn’t cover the news as well?

Though it was submitted and discussed anyway, which always happens. That can be confirmed with your own keywords.

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
Even in France, there's a trial period during which the employee can leave, or be fired freely; in most cases, 2/3 months should be long enough to detect a bad hire.

Assuming there's enough time & resources to manage the new hire properly; if there isn't, then I think it's fair to consider this a failure of the hiring process.
they did release it. a magic drive i have seen, but totally do not own, has it
Wondering why all those console.log calls ended up in the presumably final version of the exploit. All the more chances for someone to see what they were doing.
Still an abstraction if you don't understand how each of the parts of the computer work. And that level of detail goes all the way down to the actual implementation of the logic gates. One who could also include how your monitor display work and the keyboard.

Lower is not lowest.
they are worthless. the main code is in the userspace
> It made me realize just how many fundamental things that I completely took for granted in the "modern" computing world, were ultimately just concepts derived from UNIX

Oh so very much yes.

And the flipside of this is that it's very very hard to get new ideas into the heads of people who only know and have only ever seen computers running Unix-style or Unix-inspired computers.

Some examples:

The product that the inventors of Unix did next was Plan 9. It's still alive and in development. Some things that Plan 9 takes as givens that blow Unix folks' minds:

* There is no one true view of the filesystem. It's all namespaces and every process can (and normally would) see a different namespace. They are all correct and there is no one valid underlying view: it's all relative, and all interpreted.

* Everything really is a file. For example the contents of a window on screen is a file. Arguably if your GUI doesn't do this, is it really Unix-like?

* There's no keyboard-driven command-line editing because of course your computer has a graphical screen and you can just use the mouse. Why would you pretend your input window is a 1970s 80x25 text terminal? What's the point of that?

Then Plan 9 evolved into Inferno. It breaks more assumptions.

* C is not low level any more because computers have evolved very far away from the machines C was designed for. C has no native standard build-in way to represent matrices of 256-bit values and apply SIMD transformations to them as one operation, and no way to farm out 10000 threads to 1000 compute units.

So, throw C in the bin, and replace it with something a bit more abstract.

* Computers have different types of CPUs. So, compile source± to intermediate code and embed the runtime in the kernel. No need for a JVM or any other runtime; no need for WASM or eBPF; it's stock.

* Any binary can execute on any CPU. Computers can have more than one type of CPU and compiled code can move between them without translation.

Or to move further afield...

* The Unix tradition puts the filesystem at the centre of the design. Not all do. So some OS designs do not have filesystems and do not have the concept of files. It's objects all the way down.

* Some OSes and some languages don't have compilers or interpreters or binaries. That's a 1970s implementation detail and it was eliminated 50+ years ago.

This kind of stuff can be much more powerful than the Unix model, but folks reared on Unix dismiss these ideas as toys, not understanding that clinging to a 1970s idea built on computers which are less powerful than toys today is limiting them.
I've switched jobs (software) recently (after 6.5 years).

While searching for jobs, I went once through the "now-standard" hiring procedure for an employer,
that included an automated test with programming and IQ-test like questions. It was the 1st time I went through it.

I think that a college freshman might have done better in some of the questions, regardless that I have ~15 years of experience.
Also the software they used (their own product I was supposed to work on) had a bug in the report, that falsely indicated I hadn't completed one of the tests.

The whole experience was
a. Stressful
b. Somewhat irrelevant to my skillset
c. Totally dehumanizing

Long story short, I started looking for opportunities using my connections etc, and settled for a job with less $$ but hopefully less bullsh*t too.
cargo check will take long once you use macros.
And now the advice changes to
"well you shouldnt use that many macros", and a new criticism will be made, followed by "well you shouldnt....." and a new...

I dont think this wont even work for most kind of programming. I always do an edit-compile-run cycle when im programming, or I break everything to .so and dynamically reload as much as possible. Very easy with C++ and C.

I am waiting on zig and its in place binary patching.
But just saying that you should cargo check instead of running and seeing with your eyes if your change made sense or not or is affecting perf or not is....ridiculous.

I think this kind of development flow works better when you are writing already solved solutions or rewriting code. How on earth are you gonna cargo check a perf issue, or a game or memory leaks???
Conway's Law and Coding Assistants
I mean, it’s not like my interviewer knew all those languages, so I guess the fact the results were plausible was enough.
We have 1 year of paid parental leave (although only ~60% of your salary) in Germany, so almost everyone can do it.
More true to say that all output is bullshitting, not just the ones we call hallucinations. Some of it is true, some isn't. The model doesn't know or care.
That is not true, if you are forced to do a job that you have no interest for of course you will feel unhappy. Now being forced means on many levels, today in most developed countries you can survive even with basic jobs but you want to have a house of this size, a car of this brand etc etc then you are forced.

But if you find a job not because you want to keep up with your neighbour but the one which you personally see useful and do it with a sense of purpose then you can easily work extra hours and be happy.
Japanese web design: weird, but it works [video]
We have to complain about literally everything you just said. The entire system is broken.

Everyone should be entitled to live their lives without being subject to these awful conditions, but we as a society keep allowing this to happen because we don't really see them as equals. As long as we individually can get by, we can easily dismiss what everyone else endures.

I would happily live with less if everyone else could live a better life for it. In reality we wouldn't even need to sacrifice much since the wealth accumulation is so large. Redistributing that alone would be more than enough.

I say quit trying to solve systemic issues with individualistic solutions.

Not sure how we can have a "peaceful and happy mind" while everyone outside of our little bubble suffers. This line of thinking is, to me, an example of why we'll never fix any of this.

This attitude of "be happy our bubble isn't as bad as the other bubbles" is a tragedy. Folks, remember we're all in the same boat!
> they are historical books on computer design.

> historical books

> historical

> orical

> ical

> cal

> al

MUST. NOT. CRUMBLE. INTO. DUST.
That sounds like a relatively common Covid side effect.
You forgot to test for associativity: ((1-1)-1) vs (1-(1-1)).

Your implementation does handle it correctly though, but it requires some care when using parser generators :)
Exactly. I said a variation of this and some user flagged my comment.
I'm not familiar but curious: If you entirely self-publish, is there a benefit to having an ISBN number over... Just publishing w/o one? Or is there a legal requirement to do so?
Probably just because in the full phrasing, ``i would like to "borrow" his gpu``, omitting the scare quotes would paint the picture of their friend unplugging/unsoldering their GPU and lending it to the author.
To be honest, being able to think about things in multiple levels of abstraction is an advantage no matter what level you are (writing assembly or writing react)
Firms skip security reviews of major app updates about half the time
Pixi – reproducible, scientific software workflows
The problem is KDP is the 500 pound Gorilla for self pub, and traditional publishers only publish a vanishingly small proportion of works. If you want to make a career out of it, sure try trad first. You're almost certainly not going to make it. If it's a hobby, or you don't get through the needle at a trad publisher, you leave the majority of income on the table if you get locked out of KDP unless you're in a niche and already have direct access to a large portion of your readers.

E.g. if you're writing tech books about an OSS project you're at the core of, you can probably do fine without KDP.

If you write fiction, being without KDP will make things 10x as difficult.

This does not mean I disagree with you. In principle you're right. Just pointing out that in the general case KDP is such a big factor for writers that for most it will habe a lot of weight.

There's a reason they get away with KDP Select (exclusivity for Amazon) to include you in Kindle Unlimited, for example: It takes very little KU income to outweigh all other e-book sales channels for a lot of self published authors.

I've just removed my two novels from it, not because I think I'll earn more that way, because I don't, but because I agree it's worth diversifying - in my case more because I've decided I earn little enough from it that I can afford to make it more about principle and maybe contributing in some tiny way to reducing Amazons dominance.
Timeline of computing milestones 2020–present
Kin selection is not the same thing as group selection as in "survival of the species". Kin-selection theories might "work" due to the emergent behaviour of social systems but "survival of the species" is something else altogether and unrelated.
There are no stressful jobs, there are only stressful people.

Name me one job that is stressful for every single human being who ever lived on this planet. Or name a job that is never stressful for anyone.

You can spend whole life trying to find non-stressful job and never get it, because the problem is with you, not with your job.
Only for those that misunderstand OOP with inheritance, and never learned there are many forms of OOP.
The cost of the office is 1/25 the cost of salaries (this is central Tokyo btw, it doesn’t really get more expensive). The cost of cleaning, air conditioning, surveilance etc is a fraction of that (just as true for your own house/apartment).

You don’t have to be pedantic about it to see that it’s fairly irrelevant in terms of cost.
I think IQ tests and similar are a filter to hire younger people without being explicit. Subtle but effective ageism.
I know, really? It's hard to appreciate future shock until you bump into it. When cheap microcontrollers can emulate big-league workstations of the past, you know you're in the future. We long ago reached the point where you could emulate a PDP-11 faster than any real one ever built.
> Its rather simple to understand, whatever job you were "wasting" time on, if there is at least 1 human being on this planet who does this same job and is happy then problem is not in this job, problem is with you.

That makes no sense whatsoever and does not take into account preference. That's like saying "if there's at least one person that likes garlic ice cream, then you disliking it is just a frame of mind".

Your logic is strange. What if I found one person who managed to obtain enlightenment from meditation and achieve happiness in a concentration camp. Would you then say that other people not being happy in a concentration camp is their problem because they couldn't do the same thing?
Life has taught me that money is the most important thing there is.

I don't understand how people could say that health is more important.

What's the point of being healthy if you don't have money? You have to spend your entire life being a slave doing stuff you hate... Why bother existing? In that case, good health feels more like a curse.

Family is more important? If you don't have money in this day and age, you can kiss your whole family goodbye... If you even managed to assemble one in the first place... Love doesn't matter when there is no money. There's no energy to engage in such abstractions.

God is more important than money? Then give me all your money. See how fast your god turns against you. About as fast as your faith evaporates.

Without money, the best you can do, the best you can be, just ain't good enough.

Some people will say that money is not the only measure of success... Yeah sure, if you can live in a forest with no money and convince a partner to live there with you, that would be success. But good luck.
> (It does make me smile though when movies use uncut diamonds as some sort of compact currency...)

My pet theory is that those are all effectively product placements; i.e. they get paid to portray diamonds in the movie as valuable.
Just being ancient is not, but it shines through in every single thing that’s there. Building the pipelines, configuring the jobs.

If I compare the ergonomics if Github Actions and Jenkins it’s light and day. For me anyway. If you like jenkins I won’t stop you from using it ;)
Photo Forensics – How law enforcement decodes your photos
source quality and editing prowess doesnt matters at all for views

and you can edit in high quality on an iphone, higher than what’s necessary to view on an iphone

so, two premises that arent substantiated
Thanks for that link ^^
I looked a little bit into the numbers [0] and mostly [1], and it's something around 1 kg of CO2/day/person. According to the guardian [2], with water, electricity, ammonia, nutrients and 2 kgs of CO2, you can make 1 kg of some kind of food replacing the meat. I don't say it's easy to do but maybe it's worth exploring to lower the quantity of food astronauts need to bring with them to space.

[0] : https://www.researchgate.net/post/How-much-will-be-the-human...
[1] : https://8billiontrees.com/carbon-offsets-credits/how-much-co...
[2] : https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/dec/05/carbon-d...
The whole point of the product is not having to open apps...
My friend Kevin was once building a graphics engine, and to test it on various GPUs he’d borrow them from Best Buy and return them within the 30 day window. Since there was a restocking fee, it seemed like a non-harmful and clever way to test a bunch of configurations.
linkedin?
There are newer articals on this which have pictures from the past year - https://talker.news/2024/07/02/tennis-ball-stuck-in-cathedra...
I am joking but not really, basically it's my belief that any place asking for 10 years of a 5 years old technology is going to be really sensitive about anyone with an "attitude"
What's so bad about the idea? I like the idea, this is not well executed but I am looking forward Apple making something like it - maybe by just improving the WatchOS.
Oh god, please no. Wouldn't surprise if MS is among suiters too.
I appreciate the pushback on this process, it made me think.

I actually asked the LLM for supporting or refuting sources. I didn’t think I was cherry picking. Looking at its response… maybe CharGPT didn’t pick up on the “refuting” detail, or maybe observationist was correct. So maybe next time a prompt “find supporting” and another prompt “find refuting” would be useful to ensure coverage of both sides.

My value add in the human+AI workflow was to check the links. They seem high quality and directly applicable to statements made. I took pressure off observationist to go find directly applicable links (and I saved time by not googling for each separate fact). That being said, I probably didn’t need to requote ChatGPT in full. I liked the full answer because it assured me ChatGPT was responding on each claim but the important thing was the links. So, more efficiency was possible in my yc comment.
Self goes one step further, in Self to create new forms of objects, first one has to clone an existing object, add the required object structure to it, dynamically, and then use it as prototype for newer instances of that form.

Additionally Self, in its original form while the Java vs Self vs Smalltalk wars were going at Sun, is a full single user workstation, only with the kernel code/JIT written in C++, everything else is Self.

It is this kind of plasticity that provided the brewing ground for high performance JITs, that eventually found their way into JavaScript, and why the usual "Python is too dynamic" excuse, is just that, an excuse for not wanting to spend the engineering resources that Smalltalk and Self JITs have trailed.
Well, I am talking specifically about people who dislike cities, people who can't be happy 9-5. If you find cities a great value and having kids fulfilling, then obviously people who work "in the system" derive enough value from it to keep going in it. So, I wasn't referring to those types.