skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's psychoactive when it's decarboxylated (smoked, prepared as an edible). From what I can tell that turns it from Delta 9 THC-A to Delta 9 THC. I first went down this rabbit hole because I found what looked like normal flower in a smoke shop, and it does indeed get you high.

I've looked at the lab results for various medical/recreational products and even they tend to have a lot of THC-A, with THC hovering around or higher than the federal limit of 0.3%.

For instance, a quick look at a Chicago dispensary: https://www.sunnyside.shop/product/3439284

THC: 0.61%

THCA: 29.91%

Edit: Wild, ninja'd on a several hour late reply!
> Even if they're the same calling convention, that should fail, but it doesn't.

It's an interesting question. According to the standard, functions with different language linkage are indeed considered different types. As a consequence, <cstdlib> should declare two overloads for qsort() that only differ in the type of the sort function. However, modern compilers don't seem to care:

"The only modern compiler that differentiates function types with "C" and "C++" language linkages is Oracle Studio, others do not permit overloads that are only different in language linkage, including the overload sets required by the C++ standard"

https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/language_linkage

In practice, extern "C" does two things (as you correctly pointed out):

1. disable name mangling - This only affects the symbol name and is not relevant for callback functions

2. enforce the (default) C calling convention - On all (modern) platforms I know, C and C++ have the same default calling convention for free functions.

This means that from the view of a C++ compiler, pointers to `foo()` and `extern "C" foo()` have the exact same type.

Anyway, no need to be nervous. Even if the compiler treated these as different types, you would get a compiler error because C++ disallows implicit casts between different pointer types.
> substitute yet another definition

I'm not entirely surprised they got this "wrong" given that the question was, "What should we call it?" Naming things (correctly, "future-proof"-ly) is hard.
I always wondered why drag-and-drop in particular was what they chose. Why not just a "Confirm" button?
CDI, love it! Much faster, much lower footprint, much easier to understand, and it doesn't bring in the kitchen sink. Also, it's standards based!

OpenWebBeans and Weld are the two implementations. OpenWebBeans starts and runs 10x significantly faster, but doesn't see the same amount of commits that Weld does.
For those looking for a dead simple DM with autologin capabilities I can recommend emptty: https://github.com/tvrzna/emptty
I feel like https://plantuml.com/ gets close to what I want by being able to make diagrams with code, but for system design what I really want is to be able to have diagrams generated directly from the code itself, maybe with some extra comments/annotations that help it along.

Does anything like that exist already?
Apple own the browser, if they want to link up your identity with your browsing habits, they can just have Safari phone home all the data.

There’s no need for this ridiculous game of charades with private relay. Why on earth would Apple bother spending so much money setting up this infrastructure to spy on a browser they own, running on an OS they also own. It would be like arguing that your bank is secretly in cahoots with shops to spy on your transaction history, because of some reason they can’t do the obvious thing of just spying on your transaction history, which they already have by virtue of being your bank.

Your claim is ridiculous and doesn’t stand up to even a modicum of scrutiny. Unless you know of reason for believing that Apple is secretly spy on their customers, but only doing in the most convoluted way possible?
Not psychoactive until you heat it (vape or smoking it), then it decarbolyzes (sp?) to THC D9. That’s true even in dispensary grade and the reason you can just eat it directly and get high.
In the 1980s a clear case of this was that MS-DOS 2.0 had system calls for file operations that basically worked like Unix whereas MS-DOS 1's filesystem API looked like CP/M.

It's an interesting story that IBM really struggled to develop an OS which was "universal" the way the "360" was supposed to be universal. The answer they came to was VM which would let you run different OSes for your batch jobs, interactive sessions, transaction managers, databases, etc. Contrast that to Unix, VAX/VMS or Windows NT where you can run all those things under one OS. In 1970 though, IBM had no idea how to do that.

Note today a Z installation is very likely to have Linux in the mix

https://www.ibm.com/z/linux

so it is no problem running your POSIX app together with traditional mainframe apps. Also there is a Java runtime

https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos-basic-skills?topic=zos-java

so you can host your Java apps.
Entropy Powers the Earth (2016) [video]
There is evidence that a person’s ability to understand and succeed in algebra is mostly determined by whether or not they can do arithmetic with fractions. Number sense is important in my opinion. Relying always on the calculator or a CAS leaves students confused and befuddled. I see this all the time in calc classes that I teach. The CAS loving students just don’t understand as well.
Yep, agree, my goal is to make a lesson $1 max. Probably I will try to make a price lower and see how I can also make the cost of lesson for me lower by using different AI models.
Asking it “3.11和3.8哪个大” (meaning “Which one is larger, 3.11 or 3.8?” in Chinese) and it answers 3.11 more than half of the time. I assume it’s because Python 3.11 is larger than Python 3.8. While it does work in its native language English, this failure doesn’t give me much confidence in its reliability, as we don’t know why it works in one language but not the other yet.
Most of that (e.g., keyring) is PAM, not the manager itself.

The xinitrc thing is for all intents and purposes just a command run before your session binary, and sometimes a few extra env vars. Arguably a bad design (just let that be up to the session binary), it oh well. History is what it is.

https://kl.wtf/posts/2022/03/12/login-managers-an-introducti...
More and more graveyards are being fenced off and secured for this reason sadly. Plus generations ago some opted to be buried with their wedding rings and such. I know some smaller family ones in my area of central Washington have been robbed.
As someone who typically is conservative leaning libertarian on most issues, I also appreciate Lina Kahn in the Biden administration. Corporate power is derived from govt power and both should generally be reigned in. I also feel that essential services should not be able to discriminate based on activity that is legal.

What is "essential" is open for debate, but I would say that transportation and communications are pretty high on the list.

Not sure I'm pro crypto(currency) if only because I think stability is a massive issue.
I don't see how your viewpoint is useful, though; Nihilism has been around for a century but I do not see how it is "an existential threat to said society." It seems like you believe something but don't have any empirical backing for it, therefore, let me remind you, as my other comment says [0], that people do not have the best record of stating why "society" is decaying.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40919253&p=2#40920318
Chevron: The president appoints many judges, who will be overseeing the slew of cases that will happen

Immunity: In an ironic twist w.r.t to the Chevron ruling, this ruling says that judges should defer to presumed immunity, making the bar very high to bring a case. With the inability to bring much evidence, it will be even harder.

Project 2025: Most of the authors (31 iirc) are former Trump staffers, and even more are involved in the massive hiring / vetting / placing process. JD Vance was Heritage's top choice

https://www.vox.com/politics/360318/project-2025-trump-polic...
https://archive.md/5IQiB
> My brother turned me on to Dr. Amen.

Red flag detected.

Dr. Amen is basically the Dr. Oz of ADHD treatment.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Amen#Reception_of_ideas

> "this practice has been found to be just as effective as medication".

No other research supports his conclusions. It's so fascinating that he can use brain-imaging to diagnosis 7 'types of ADHD', when no one else has ever discovered more than three subtypes of ADHD, and no other researchers have even been able to successfully diagnosis any mental disorder via brain imaging.

Let me put it this way, unless you are an exceptional individual, "putting in the work" and overcoming ADHD typically means one thing: You do not have ADHD.

> doctors who might not have my best intentions.

Do you not see the irony in this statement?

Please ask yourself sincerely: Do you truly think you have ADHD because an online test's results? Do you really think people with ADHD do not care about improving? Do you think people with ADHD have not tried habits they know would improve their lives?

Do you understand how many people with ADHD take medication, use behavioral interventions, and still struggle?
A buzzword that no one actually takes seriously and means very little in practice but that managers use to justify their jobs.
this is the most accurate answer unless you are AWS, Azure, or GCP. source: ex-AWS GTM
> I don't know how to solve this.

Don't use an algorithm which produces its response according to a probabilistic arrangement of tokens when solutions require accuracy / correctness? Most probable and most accurate are not the same thing. Hoping that we can get the errors down to something acceptable using an algorithm that is fundamentally inappropriate to solving the problem seems like a fool's errand to me.
The VR Winter Continues
Yes, it looks like this project is starting with helping highly motivated adult learners go deep into a hard to teach/learn material. Contrast this with the Khan Academy approach at https://www.khanmigo.ai/ targeting young students and their teachers and parents with broad assistance across subjects. Maybe they converge?
that comes later
astrology charting for MBA’s solely because Google did it at one point
Show HN: Easy example of building a chatbot using NextJS and Substrate.run
We've been building Substrate for a while now and are sharing out some examples of how we're using it. This is a little chatbot that can be used as a starting place for one of your own. We're hosting dozens of models that can be easily used to allow a chatbot to be tailored toward more specific use cases too!
Well deserved.

Hopefully more patent trolls get the same treatment.
That is a well known lesson. In any goldrush it is always profitable to sell pickaxes and spades to the miners. The miners themselves generally do less well (except the happy few that strike gold)
You're assuming truth is the goal, which isn't correct. The goal of police is to close cases, and in this goal, polygraphs are quite effective.

They don't care if you actually did the crime, they care that they can extract a confession, or provide damning evidence to a prosecutor that lets them throw you in prison, so they can put a nice big checkmark on that case. Did they actually jail who was responsible? Maybe not, but who cares about that, apart from you?

Same reason for Forensics to exist. Don't misunderstand, some Forensic science has validity in many cases, but a lot of it is just straight up nonsense that isn't proven or peer-reviewed in the slightest, in fact many Forensic sciences that appear in modern court cases are completely, 100% debunked.

And like, why should they care? Even if you hire a crack lawyer team that gets you out of the court case, it's not like anyone involved in the investigation that almost threw an innocent man in jail is going to suffer an ounce of consequences. Or hell, even if you're wrongly convicted, worst case scenario you get a financial judgement after years of litigation, that's paid for by the taxpayers.
How did I get into this? It started when I saw the simulation of the 6502 processor from the Visual6502 team [1]. It was very cool, but totally mysterious. I realized that even though I was a programmer and understood the "full stack", I had no idea how a processor chip actually worked. (I'd taken computer architecture courses but there's still a big jump to physical transistors on a chip.)

I started looking at the 6502's circuits and one thing led to another and here I am today, reverse-engineering obscure chips with a microscope :-)

[1] http://www.visual6502.org/JSSim/index.html
Microsoft gives up observer seat on OpenAI board
Step 1: Buy lottery ticket with correct numbers on it.

Step 2: Cash it in and make a lot of money.
Augmenting Puzzmo: Making weird possible
Sorry you received unhelpful sass from other commenters. It stands for "Objective and Key Result" - it's a common "business-speak" initialism that basically translates to "a measurable, data-driven goal".
It's very funny, he's the only person on Earth who is 100% confirmed not to be Satoshi.
There are better anti-jamming antennas available. DoD has been developing these for some time. It just costs money for airlines to certify and install them. But there should be a fix.
Funny, the title of his commandeered website is "Coming soon".

What's coming soon?

I wonder how the BSV guys are taking this... they were almost as cultish as Hexicans with Richard Heart (who confronted Craig Wright about this year ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQoyaguvGdQ )
Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy
So what? Humans are simply biological programs observing people (other biological programs). If you disagree, explain how humans are not simply biological computers.
Baidu's Mass Robotaxi Rollout Stirs Heated Debate in China
Most people are tuned out, don't want to spend the time / energy / angst that it takes to curate / learn, so they only get the reduced / filtered content from the major sources, or more concerning the viral content on social media
Repeal the Second Law! Free Energy for Everyone!
> 16-bit machines (Apple Mac, Amiga, Atari ST)

(small nitpick)
These platforms all began with Motorola 68000 which has a 32-bit ISA.
You don't have to anymore. If you run an application from a location other than /Applications, MacOS asks you if you want to move it. I've long wondered what the point of that was. Why not just let people do what they do with other files and leave it on their desktop.

The next question is: can we execute an application directly from a zip file? Or do we need to invent something that allows for a folder structure, but is also downloaded in a single file?
We just published a paper on this topic. I wrote a summary of it, “Learning to code with and without AI”.

https://austinhenley.com/blog/learningwithai.html
Heya! 1Password employee here. We have never locked anyone out of their 1Password Account for missing a payment, and we never will.

Whenever your subscription lapses your 1Password account will instead go into a "frozen" state. While your account is frozen, you can still view, use, and even export all your items, copy your passwords, and even copy items to vaults outside your account.

The only things you won't be able to do while an account is frozen is add new items to vaults, edit existing items, invite people to your family or team, or autofill items in your browser.
Good, this guy is totally evil and malicious. He has plenty of capacity to pay for the damage he has caused people who actually did contribute to bitcoin.
Initially I was thinking it was 0.3% by weight, which would be no big deal -- a gummy worm under 3.5g would be legal for 10mg of THC. But it's 0.3% by volume! What volume does 10mg of THC take up? Quick search didn't make it clear... but I think you'd need probably a little over a liter of liquid to get 10mg of THC at a concentration of no more than 0.3%. Not terrible, but I could see a silly product called "hemp water" that's just a 1.5L bottle of water with hemp-derived THC in it.

For an edible it'd probably be a bit painful.. a whole bag of gummies (and then some) like you suggest...
This seems like survivorship bias. Kaggle was pretty well-positioned to do what Hugging Face is doing (and in fact, they are trying now somewhat). There's also a lot of others that tried to build a marketplace for AI models and failed.
You need to use diagramming tools that are meant for complex systems. Almost all of the complaints in this article are caused be using generic drag-and-drop diagramming tools.
At things that only exist in the mind, like, say, pain.
For a guy claiming to have invented bitcoin, is he at least an expert on crypto?
Well it's not like they're going to plot to kill their buddy Biden.
Considering he was a never-trumper and called trump hitler... i'm pretty sure hes just saying and doing whatever shit will get niche groups to vote for him.
Honestly ALL diagrams are a dead end, any system where there is no single source of truth will be a big hassle to maintain and therefore will not be updated which makes the whole thing useless.

The only which I can see working as it has already proven itself for certain tasks is something like the blueprints from the unreal engine but where each node represents something big enough to warrant its own node without any no low level details like variables, conditionals, loops etc. Otherwise you end up with literally spaghetti code.
As a supplement to therapy I can recommend neurofeedback. It is a scientifically supported method that basically uses EEG to help you tune up your subconscious stress reactions. Completely noninvasive, used with children too. It has multitude of benefits, including improvement of mental acuity.
People will do anything to avoid nuclear
Trump Allies Propose Manhattan Projects for AI
I'd say it's more than that. OKRs are a concrete framework that came out of Intel and was popularized by Google. But yes, the focus is on setting objectives backed by measurable results.

Can be a document, an app, whatever. One flavor is objectives are set at the top, their KRs are translated into objectives for the next management layer with their own KRs, and so on. It's an iterative process with some combination of top-down and bottoms-up activities. And afterwards, the results are reviewed. There's more to it, but that's the gist.
Almost all of his complaints stem from using generic drag-and-drop diagramming tools. A modern take on system diagramming, like Ilograph[0], solves most of these issues (IMBO).

[0] https://www.ilograph.com
They run on the BEAM, and there are related IoT-platforms like Nerves. If find that to be a much nicer runtime than (C)Python.

Edit: I don't know where else to begin. It's a runtime that has lightweight processes, excellent observability, absurdly good fault tolerance, really nice programming languages and so on. It's designed for distributed computing.
An objective is a qualitative goal. The key results are generally quantitative numbers that can help you measure if you are achieving that goal.

An example: an objective might be "improve application performance". The key results for that objective might be "reduce average page load time from 3s to 1.5s" and "reduce API response times by 60%".
Agreed. But at least the School of Mines is thinking ahead: https://space.mines.edu/
The biggest impact I've seen is that you cannot adjust priorities for an entire quarter.
I've never used a Mac and agree that it is not intuitive. I can see that it is telling me to drag it into Applications but it doesn't explain why. The UAC prompt has some explanation to what is going on.
Well thats one hell of a homepage
https://youtu.be/XAeKtyL2m-Q [Interview with Jr. Product Manager]
Yes, looking at IBM stuff is like being in a parallel universe where everything you take for granted is slightly off. You have token-ring instead of Ethernet, you have SNA (or something) instead of TCP/IP. Characters are EBCDIC, not ASCII. Terminals are connected with coax, not RS-232. For hardware, chips are packaged in metal instead of plastic. Circuit boards are a weird grid. Even the terminology and schematic symbols are different: if it looks like an AND gate, it's an OR gate.
There are a lot of false and exaggerated claims in the world. Why are we bothering to spend so much time on this in court?
Some people pay per text message received. So, they have to ask each and every one of their iMessage-using friends to please not send these ridiculous reactions, because they are ultimately another text message which will cost money. If that counts as "forcing others to adapt their communication" well then I'm sorry, but their preference is my cost, so I don't think it's out of line to politely ask them not to.

Ultimately, this is something that I'd rather be handled at the carrier layer: I should be able to have my phone reject a text message and not pay for / receive it.

On the topic of configurability: Software should ultimately serve the end user. When a developer makes an undesirable (to a user) change to the software and provides the user no way to opt out of that change, it's serving the developer's interests, and it's doing a slightly worse job at serving the user.
I wonder if it'd be possible to poison. If I have to send clicks I need to also send enough clicks to make it not worthwhile.
Interesting. Independent of the specific strategies, I always think of HuggingFace as squandering potential. They could/should/can be the singular place where you explore _and_ productionize these open/social models. But their offerings are nowhere near as good as Replicate and the others. At least last I checked.
I sure hope so, but I doubt it.
This suggests the iterated optimum strategy is to just keep chasing new points trying to land that golden moment, though. If you think such points and moments are plentiful enough that you'll find them in your lifetime reliably (I do!).
Well he got his butt out of the country as soon as the initial judgement came down and hasn't returned since.

More positive effects, https://x.com/CobraBitcoin/status/1813271585882505272

It's good to be here but its unfortunate that it required spending more than 10 million pounds and took several years of several people's lives to get here.

... and counting, considering that he's announced that he will appeal.
When I was in high school, I had a similar experience at the place I worked. The manager had money missing from her purse, and someone (the actual thief, I assume) said they saw me take it.

On my own volition and expense, I took a polygraph test about it. On one of the control questions, I kept reacting in a manner the examiner said indicated untruthfulness. I was certainly being truthful, though. No matter how he reworded the question, I failed it.

Fortunately, it wasn't the "payload" questions. He swapped that control question out for a different one and declared me truthful. I presented the results to my manager at the same time as I quit.

That experience, though, got me very interested in polygraph examinations and started a hobbyist interest in the entire field and history of lie detection.

That led to me understanding that it's not a thing that is (currently, anyway) actually possible. What is done instead are psychological tricks that very much depend on the examinee believing that the whole thing is legitimate.