skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Google for Mac OS X Server 1.0 screenshots... the UI was a bizarre mashup of classic Mac OS and NeXTSTEP, you can see they were part way through bolting a Mac-like interface on.

When Mac OS X was eventually released it looked utterly different.
They probably need something that has longer negative effects. They need something that is slightly poisonous.
OBS Studio 30.2
I don't understand, Wikipedia was still beyond me. Can you share more about what this would mean?
eReaders on iOS suck because they can't have this obvious feature.
You can do some weird keymapping using accessibility options to get a remote keyboard to make page changes if you want.
I don't think there are any federal laws about collecting rainwater, so this case wouldn't be relevant.
I would think a drone operator and service contracts are a lot more expensive than a lifeguards hourly
> So you’re sure it will stay that way, because you trust management to do the right thing

Because they’ve given me reason to believe they will? But mostly because the law makes it really hard to let go of employees when your company is doing well enough to keep them.
I feel like there are a number of data structures that you might initially set up (or load in) in some preferred contiguous order, which will still remain largely contiguous after modification, so that you get a good tradeoff between cheap operations and fast traversal. You’d then have the option to do partial defragmentation at convenient times, without having to have a convoluted hybrid data structure. But it’s definitely something you’d do in specific critical cases after a lot of analysis.
Am I the only one who had an issue with their example query of "give me all physics PhDs in NYC"? Are they really asking for a listing of all people living in NYC holding a PhD in physics? I can't shrug off the feeling that this is the sort of a request that The Terminator might make, just before filtering it further to those with the surname Connor. I for one feel that such queries should be somewhat difficult (at least beyond people who actively want to be found and put their credentials up on linkedin).
I think responsive refers to data, not to mouse/user interactions.
How does a raft administer cpr?
Context: this is the infamous Supreme Court case that decided the federal government has the right to regulate a farmer growing wheat for his own consumption (and, by extension, pretty much anything else it wants to), because by not buying wheat on the market he's engaging in interstate commerce.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn
Yes? They have different use cases which they are good at.
Of all the people in the world to go after, he's going to go after the Notepad++ guy? Really?

https://notepad-plus-plus.org/author/
By the way, an argument for ex-falso which I found very compelling: Take "False" to be syntactic sugar for "0 = 1"; then you can prove by induction that if False then all numbers are equal. That gives you a great deal of quodlibet completely soundly (since by induction on list-length, all lists are then equal to the empty list, and so on).
I had high hopes that System76 would take advantage of the chance to establish a clear design language around their new desktop environment from the get-go, but from the screenshots it looks like they're happy to repeat the mistakes of GNOME. There is no visual indication of which elements are clickable and what's just text.

I guess "GNOME but in Rust" is still a win, but I must admit I was hoping for something more disruptive given that it's not "just" a fork like so many other desktop environments out there.
The same, read a few books, all recommended more or less the same.

=> while was working full time and had income I've sold all stock that got from the employee and put into VTSAX.

Living from these money for the past few years in the Bay Area.
Curiously, the interpunct in the title of this article (Wall·E) can be control F searched with ("walle") but all of your usages cannot (try "sometimes" and "clarify")
I did something similar during the rave days and the memories are making my blood pressure spike. It was the most annoying and time consuming way that I have ever lost a lot of money. I could have quite literally paid you $10,000 to waterboard me and it would have been cheaper, more efficient and about as pleasant.
Could it be, that Chevron being overturned has positive outcomes for the common man? I’m shocked
they should not do that because Meta is not a platform for constitutionally-allowed free speech, instead, they are a platform for selective filtering.

So let them stay that way. It is good to have the moral clarity of what they do, enforced by their actions.

It much more beneficial for the society today, and for the future -- that the political actors have their masks off.

I am not trying to suggest that Meta is good or bad, I am just happy that we see Zuckerberg and other billionaires with the mask off, same for many others.
After a deacade of using SQL it "clicked" for me
Now the title reads like angry fisherman are fighting them. Why even editorialize the source headline?
Not only that, there's a fairly clear hint on page 4 that, given a suitable case, the court might have been willing to find against ATF regulations on the manufacture of prohibited firearms or accessories as well.
History books will write about the Roberts court in pretty much the same way that history writes about former Supreme Court Chief Justice Rober B. Taney [1], possibly most famous for the Dred Scott decision [2].

This decision is a just a district court decision but you will be seeing a ton of these over the coming years and the playbook will be exactly the same:

1. Challenge some government regulation in a conservative federal district court, probably the Fifth Circuit (Texas, Alabama, Louisiana). Judges in this circuit tend to be very conservative because of Blue Slip system [3]. Any nominee for Federal court by convention requires a sponsoring Senator and the Senators in these states are pretty much always Republicans. It's worse in Texas too because of the way the Fifth Circuit is organized into divisions it's really easy to judge shop;

2. SCOTUS just ended Chevron deference. That means for 40+ years, Congress would pass laws like "The EPA will ensure there's clean air and water" and the EPA would decide what that meant. The Chevron deference part is that courts deferred to Federal agencies whenever any legislative language is ambiguous. Thing is, Congress relied on this when writing legislation for 40+ years. It's also impossible to write legislation for every aspect of regulation. It's simply too much;

3. SCOTUS also ended the statute of limiations (previously 6 years) for challenging any federal regulation through the Corner Post decision [4]. This case got less attention but the impact is going to be massive. Previously when a Federal regulation was made you had 6 years from inception to challenge it. Now the 6 years applies from when the injury begins so you can challenge a 100 year old law by establishing an LLC and claiming injury;

4. A Fifth Circuit court will say the case is open and shut because the legislative language is ambiguous;

5. Other circuits, particularly the 9th Circuit, will interpret things differently. This essentially forces SCOTUS to act to resolve different circuits having different interpretation. This court in particular will rule against regulation.

We will see for years to come a torrent of cases that will dismantle every aspect of Federal regulation. What's crazy is some people who will absolutely be hurt by this will celebrate it. Arsenic and lead in your water will hurt you. Dumping waste into the Chesapeake Bay will hurt you. Polluting the air will hurt you. The only people this will benefit is the extremely rich who get to get slightly richer.

Roberts will be remembered for this, stripping voting rights, Dobbs, presidential immunity (which will be up there with Dred Scott) and, of course, Citizens United, which decided that money = speech.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_B._Taney

[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford

[3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_slip_(U.S._Senate)

[4]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corner_Post,_Inc._v._Board_of_...
I would suggest getting a last gen handheld, since they're pretty cheap now, have good libraries of actual proper games (especially with emulation), and physical controls just can't be beat. I got a near-perfect vita from Japan for $90 and I'm quite happy with it. Not as convenient as the phone in your pocket, but if you're carrying around a backpack anyways it's not bad, and for kids maybe encouraging them off smartphones ain't so bad (:
> are not, in fact, seagulls

Journalists are known to be gullible
Sure, I have worked at companies that manage their IT infrastructure that way. It's fine, way more efficient and secure than letting every department do their own thing.
Not when there's a global interpreter lock.
Nokia would still be around
Fair enough.

So less about chat but more about async-first exchange. Sounds like e-mail?
I agree with that. I just don't like big numbers being used to cause emotional responses without proper context. Probably on a spectrum, but it's my beef :)
This is an interesting discussion. We have come to accept the government playing a large role in many activities. While I am not particularly interested in distilling my own vodka, I do have similar interests. And certainly one has to wonder at the role of commercial corporation in regulations. Cui bono.

Also, to my mind it is worth reading any court opinion that contains this line "... Congress did nothing more than statutorily ferment a crime"
Have you tried?
CTRL+C on most dialogs will copy all of the text to clipboard.
Of course, there are 3rd party dialogs that are not standard Windows dialogs and they do not implement this functionality.
Maybe hire a falcon will be a service before long
I definitely like some aspects of conda, but at least pip doesn't give me these annoying infinite "Solving environment" loops [0].

[0] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56262012/conda-install-t...
This illustrates the huge problem with courts' interpretation of the Commerce Clause: it's used in some very useful ways to allow for some very useful regulation and lawmaking... but it's also used in some messed up ways, like this one. (Arguably this one is a fairly minor bad way.)

I'm not sure what the solution is. Throwing out the expansive interpretation of the Commerce Clause could be disastrous in the general sense, even if it ends up striking some laws that are clearly an abuse of federal power over the states.

But the real problem is the motivation: conservatives in the US seem to want to dismantle the federal government and turn over nearly every domestic concern to the states (except where they get to impose "conservative, Christian values" on the rest of the country, of course). I get why that can be an attractive proposition in some areas, but overall I think it would be disastrous. Many problems we face today (that we did not face in the late 1700s) more or less require a coordinated, national response, via legislation and regulation.

And on top of that, we can expect decisions based on ideology, and the future looks bad to me. Nationwide environmental protections set by the EPA? Nope, unconstitutional, interstate commerce doesn't cover that sort of thing. And things like California setting strict emission standards that end up being the standard? Nope, can't do that either, that's interference in interstate commerce.
https://worldwaterreserve.com/is-it-illegal-to-collect-rainw...

> "Water laws are handled on the state level"
CTRL-C will copy the entire text to the clipboard for standard message boxes.
No need to retype manually. If you upload a screenshot of the error to ChatGPT, it will transcribe it for you and even give you some hints on how to resolve it.
The entire article is about the potentially deleterious effect they are having on local birds. Right now its understudied and evidently not been used for rescues which puts the entire program into question.
Interpreting one-link comments is an excercise in creativity, but making some guesses:

1) You didn't check the source for the CFR. Wikipedia links an article that doesn't mention CFR or even use the word fatal. And as recently as '08 they were discovering that what they thought was one disease is actually 2.

2) I just wrote a comment explaining why a 100% CFR would be precise but likely not accurate. In case you thought it was, take a moment to reflect that linking to a table where the CFR is 100% isn't a refutation. That number is probably precise but likely not accurate. We don't seem to be good at detecting "mild" prion diseases.

3) Even if by some miracle that table is accurate and precise ... that is one disease. If you want to bet that prions only cause one disease then you're welcome to - but I'm still willing to bet that there are other prion diseases to be discovered that are less lethal.
I got this working on macOS and wrote up some notes on the installation process and a short script I wrote to demonstrate how it differs from non-free-threaded Python: https://til.simonwillison.net/python/trying-free-threaded-py...
>they should not do that because Meta is not a platform for constitutionally-allowed free speech, instead, they are a platform for selective filtering.

"Selective filtering" by private platforms like Facebook (I will die on the hill of refusing to call it Meta) is constitutionally allowed free speech.
Firefox users demanded "AI"^1 and Mozilla has answered the call.

FN1. ?
If you are hurt by arsenic you can sue the person who harmed you. I’m glad we are entering an era of massive deregulation, to reverse the endless strangulation of American society by a bloated, metastatic, parasitic regulatory state that has (thus far) only grown and never shrank. You can hear the shrieks from DC as their cushy $160k make work jobs are going to end.
> Because even though the world of non-programmers uses Windows, the world of programmers decidedly do not use Windows. I think if you were to analyze what people use in the vast world of startups, corporations, open source projects, and other places you'd find it's inverted with 95% of programmers not using Windows.

My personal observation is quite different - this is clearly written by someone who lives in his bubble.

Most obviously: most corporations do use Windows. Also for technology startups outside of the "web application operator" type (here it depends a lot on the local culture), many use Windows: often because this is what the customers use, and the software/service of the startup has to be compatible with the ecosystem of the customer.
No but at least to me that is the implication. And I think it’s fantastic if you can, but a lot of times on here I see people who are completely out of touch with the material reality people live in.

Beyond that, there is a certain frailty to all this stuff too, nobody deserves to be treated poorly, but the inability to bounce back from that is not great either
[dupe]

More discussion:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40837081

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40856329
just put all information (names, addresses, ssn, DoB, etc) on a publicly visible blockchain already.

Then there is no data left to breach.

Instead develop systems to audit the usage of that blockchain and send to jail/military anyone who attempts to use that information in an unauthorized manner.
globcat.sh is a tiny little shell script that concatenates multiple files together, as specified by a glob pattern, and sends them to standard output.
That is amazing, isn't it?

I want to understand, in:

uint64_t sum5(Node *node) {
uint64_t value = 0;
Node *next = NULL;
for (; node; node = node->next) {
for (;;) {
value += node->value;
if (node + 1 != node->next) {
break;
}
node++;
}
}
return value;
}

How is this magic:

if (node + 1 != node->next) {
break;
}

Better than the more intuitive:

if (node->next == null) {
break;
}

Also.. why is `node + 1' even a valid comparison? (Please forgive my rusty C/C++, college was awhile ago)
That's a separate issue. There are criminal and administrative penalties for mishandling classified information that apply to anyone with a clearance, regardless of whether they are a government employee or private contractor. As long as you follow all the rules yourself you won't be punished for someone else's actions.
> It also required a hefty 16MB RAM but as with all minimum system requirements from Microsoft, it really shined on 32MB+.

This is just me going down memory lane, but my aunt gave me her corporate Toshiba laptop with NT4 back in 1996 since she hated the idea of working from home back then. I made friends with a kid who brought his dad's work laptop to school with similar specs and it always ran blazingly faster, always wondered why. I remember my aunt's laptop had 16mb of RAM. Thanks for clearing this up :)

That Terraserver wiki article has my head spinning a bit. Crazy how time flies.
You're using "AI" quite broadly here. Here's a perspective from computer vision (my field).

For decades, CV was focused on trying to 'understand' how to do the task. This meant a lot of hand crafting of low level features that are common in images, finding clever ways to make them invariant to typical 3D transformations. This works well for some tasks, and is still used today in things like robotics, SLAM etc. However - when we then want to add an extra level of complexity - e.g. to try and model an abstract concept like "cat", we hit a bit of a brick wall. This happens to be a task where feeding a large dataset into an (mostly) unconstrained machine learning model does very well.

> The classical approach was to understand how genes transcribe to mRNA, and how mRNA translates to polypeptides; how those are cleaved by the cell, and fold in 3D space; and how those 3D shapes results in actual biological function.

I don't have the expertise to critique this, but it does sound like we're in the extreme 'high complexity' zone to me. Some questions for you:

- how accurate does each stage of this need to get to useful performance? Are you sure there are no brick walls here? How long do you think this approach will take to deliver results?

- do you not have to validate a surprising classical finding in the same way that you would an AI model - i.e. how much does the "why" matter? "the AI can never provide a guarantee of correctness" - is true, but what it was merely extremely accurate, in the same way that many computer vision models are?
This reminds me of the story where someone accidentally deletes the database and there are no backups. Who's at fault? The individual IT employee who made a mistake, or the entire organization (especially leaders) who created a situation where one person could delete the database and there are no backups?
I guess the goal is that the drone can intervene before CPR is necessary.

But there's always a limit in capabilities - providing better access to some help is clearly still of benefit, providing faster access to limited capabilities over a wider area may be a better end result than the same resources being used for higher capabilities, but more limited reach.
Modern compilers are not doing much searching in general. It's mostly apply some feed-forward heuristic to determine whether to apply a transformation or not.

I think a slower, search based compiler could have a lot of potential for the hottest parts you're willing to spend exorbitant time on a search.
Fair point, though how you received it was not the intent! I’ve probably been steeped too long in the corporate world and figured readers who’d be interested in this topic would likely understand (as you have). However, I’ll definitely try to avoid the appearance of corpo-speak mumbo-jumbo in the future.
The linked opinion makes a point of explaining how this case differs frim Wickard v Filburn.

For as crazy as the 5th circut and Supreme Court are, I don't see either of them being crazy enough to take on Wickard v Filburn.
It would die immediately due to global warming, or it would be killed for its horns by traditional medicine maniacs. But could be a good source of textiles and perhaps protein. It was a source of protein back in ita day.
Interstate compacts (same law across most/all states) were used before the bastardized version of interstate commerce. Can be used again.
> also impossible to write legislation for every aspect of regulation. It's simply too much

Ha. Perhaps there's a hint in there somewhere, but I assume it won't be taken. ;)

I agree that lead in water hurts us though. Good thing nobody has to worry about that thanks to our massive Federal bureaucracy.
Thank you.

The whole point of index investing is to be boring.
Would the rest of the drug laws be in question too?
I'm not going to read the whole paper, but I didn't find anything in the paper which used the words "overhyped" "wildly expensive," or "unreliable."

Unreliable for what? There's so many different ways which people use these services. The way I use them, it's not unreliable. Because I don't use these services in a way which would be unreliable.

Instead, it seems the broader conversation that the huge investment in AI might not pay off right away is very plausible. I pay $20 per month for one of these services. And that $20 service is maybe the most expensive to implement of anything I have paid $20 monthly by a long shot.

And this is important for the audience of Goldman Sachs. Maybe it's not so important for the typical reader of Hacker News. Who reads Goldman Sachs papers?
996 is fairly common in Asia, but most of the companies who do them are quite inefficient. They generally pay well. Much of that labor tends to go into documentation, tests, debugging tools. FE tends to be overdetailed, like you'd see a class called PrimaryButton8VerticalPadding6StartPadding.

I find that work in those companies are fairly chill because of this. Developer experience is a lot better. It's more drag and drop. Longer hours mean you see people in offices just hanging out until late at night. They'll scarf down a naan in 6.8 minutes, then head up to office, then watch something on their computer.

Companies with less hours are generally more stressful. You need to be pretty smart. Sometimes you have to find out where the docs are. Sometimes you have to read the code and not the docs. It's really up to what you're comfortable with.

What really sucks is the companies that work 6 days but think that they're actually working hard. It's a slider whether you want to work harder or work longer hours.
Effective life guards often need to be well trained and physically selective, and observant and not distracted over a pretty long time. Hiring untrained, minimum wage teenagers may tick the box of "Has life guard", but not necessarily "/Effective/ life guard"

So, is it really cheaper to "just get more effective life guards?"
Since we're already getting insta-reactions from people who haven't read the decision, here are some clarifying points:

* This is a district court decision, not even an appeals court much less the Supreme Court.

* This decision rests on an interpretation of Congress's powers and therefore has nothing to do with Chevron or Loper.

It's an interesting decision that may have repercussions if it's appealed, but not directly related to any recent drama.
> While Russia’s invasion of Ukraine “has complicated things,” Elliott said, the collaboration between the U.S. and Russia on BEST is still ongoing, for now.

Nice to hear in these uncertain times.
I don't think that will help today. Many of these important issues will be agreed upon by around half the states, and vehemently opposed by the other half. Half the country in agreement is still not enough.
This is correct. The whole application installation process, including the creation of a venv, installing stuff into it, and registering it with some on-PATH launcher should be one command.

BTW pyenv comes relatively close.
But if packets have to go over the internet at some point, aren't all bets off if you use UDP?