skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Google is by and large run by a bunch of engineers who are trying to do the right thing and often don't think about how things might be perceived.

Strange statement given that there's absolutely no evidence of that.
If UDP is completely open, then QUIC would work too. Quite a bit of the public Internet works fine with QUIC.

And there's already a protocol to proxy over QUIC, called MASQUE.
Consfigurator 1.4.1 released, including new support for FreeBSD
I think you already know the answer. Your current setup is too unwieldy, and it's discouraging you from writing. By all means, hack on something clever to support ~independent IA/UX for segmentation, if it's important to you. You can use the time and the stoke you'll regain by ditching your current fragmented / redundant workflow.
This is somewhat begging the question. It assumes that:

A) this is a unified model for how queer people talk about gender.

B) the term "cisgender" does anything at all to advance it. And

C) that it causes harm.

without providing any evidence for any of those claims.

----

It also assumes:

D) that the multiple ideas being bundled up here are entirely incorrect, or that they are some kind of new idea.

Male and female genders are socially constructed, at the very least in presentation -- and that's not a new idea, it's an entirely uncontroversial understanding of gender that's been around for ages. Just as one example, pink used to be a manly color. Social stereotypes of women as innocent or highly sexual and wild also vary between cultures and time periods.

This has been a theory of gender for a long time, it's not a new idea. And it has nothing to do with sexual biological differences beyond expressing the (again, entirely uncontroversial and generally accepted) idea that not all social customs and attitudes are 100% biologically based.

----

And you might have criticism of that model, just like you might have criticisms of gender essentialism. There is not uniformity on how to view gender even within queer communities. There is no singular model to debunk. Everyone (queer or not) has their own model of gender.

And that's the final problem to bring up, that you're also assuming:

E) that the statement "I'm not cisgender, I'm normal" doesn't have harmful effects, or that it doesn't push people towards a competing model of gender with its own flaws and inaccuracies that could be interrogated in the exact same way as other gender/sex models.
For me I find planes a good way to disconnect from the outside world.

Buy yourself some noise cancelling headphones, either over-ear or in-ear like Airpods Pro. At a minimum these provide a lot of comfort on planes to keep the noise down from potential passengers and the aircraft itself. I often wear them without any music at all.

I like to whip a book out and read or look out the window.
Were you using FRB for private banking or commercial banking?

Private/Relationship banking might be lackluster with JPM depending on your account size.

Idk if I'd trust a non-FDIC insured bank and any bank that isn't Basel 1/2 compliant so most Neobanks seem too risky. They anyhow prefer to use state chartered banks which tend to be significantly more brittle than nationally chartered banks.
> Under JR's definitions 150% capacity means people have enough space to read a newspaper.

Having ridden on the Yamanote in peak time, I don't believe that.
> The road towards ARM is very rough for those who do not control the entire ecosystem around the hardware.

Isn't that what Framework does?

Framework creating an ARM variant with in-tree drivers and bundled with something like tow-boot out of the box would be a huge win for the community. The pinebook pro sucks and is the only real competition in this space unless you count chromebooks.

> It's one thing to have a killer chip, but if nobody supports it, it's DOA

The beautiful thing about Linux/OSS these days is you can typically assume if you have amd64 support, there's probably a working arm64 port, too.
"seriously"? Scott uses humor to present some rather unsettling facts, and while I personally find his mannerism crass... the assertion remains plausible.

>doesn't replicate

Which studies are you referring to exactly?

There was some fair criticism of confounding variables in Universe 25 (the first page google result most people cite), but the follow up Rat Utopia eventually compensated for the carrying capacity arguments.

There were other more recent experiments where lab assistants would play with the rodents during cage cleaning, and that stimulus was proven to be enough to keep test subjects cognitively functional.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNSHZG9blQQ

Best of luck, =3
I strongly disagree. I don't see how you can interpret that sentence, especially given the "who did you think was going to win?" part, and ignore the implication that Microsoft won solely because of their size and money.

There is actually zero evidence that the judge issued his ruling based on Microsoft's superior legal team, so why even put that sentence in there anyway?
Note that anything other than MIT will immediately remove one of your major advantages over the competition. No enterprise wants viral licenses in their environment, it’s simply not worth the anxiety when there’s so many options.

If you want to compete on being open source your license has to be free.
This.

But also - if you just do it in any(?) of the popular blogging platforms then you can just use categories to separate your content and audience.

WordPress (dirty word round here I know but I'll live dangerously) for example gives you all you need to basically keep stuff separate if you want - even down to separate look and feel per category, sub domains per category, and RSS feeds per category.

Everything in one pot, but separated and separateable if you and your audiences want it. Much easier / cheaper / less fiddly all round, IMO.
> The damning part of it is that they were likely wrong for the reason of increasing profit.

Are you still advocating designing a whole new airframe instead?

> we still have to acknowledge it's not the best solution

We don't have to agree on that at all. It's an inherently simple solution, although Boeing made mistakes in its implementation.

> Just because a mitigation works some of the time

It's turning off a switch. The purpose of that switch is supposed to be a "memory item", meaning the crew should not need to consult a checklist. The switch is for dealing with runaway stab trim. Reading the step-by-step of the crisis, it is impossible for me to believe that the pilots did not know they had a runaway trim problem. There are two wheels on the side of the console, painted black and white, that spin when the trim runs, making a loud clack-clack sound. They are physically connected to the stab trim jackscrew with a cable. If the trim motor fails, the crew can manually turn the jackscrew via those wheels.

> You are advocating against well-established best practices in safety and reliability

Turning off a system that is adversely working is well-established in aviation. It's quite effective.

> and argue the points rather than appealing to (relatively weak) authority

Appeal to authority is not a fallacy when one has some authority :-) And so it is fair to list what makes one an authority.

> This isn't a pissing contest

You might want to review the condescending and quite rude post you wrote that I replied to. Your reply here is also rather rude. I don't think I've been rude to you.

Thank you for listing your credentials.
I can imagine Qualcomm being quite interested in working with Framework on a Snapdragon X Elite design.

I'd be interested in a Linux version of that laptop (especially given that all the current X Elite machines are completely locked down and only allow you to install Windows).
I think the value of compile-time JSON deserialization is... well I was going to say zero but really it's negative. It's a cute trick, but please don't ever do this in a real project.
I'd hazard you're giving politicians far too much foresight: 1.5 year timeframe is a stretch.
I cant find any info.

Last time I read a similar "groundbreaking" resullt, they were using bacteria instead of cows.

With cows, you have CO2+sunlight -> grass -> butter

With bacteria it's a similar process, but you skip the grass if they are photosynthetic), or you just replace the grass with another intermediate step.
Fair, you're right that typically you'd have a dedicated UI thread with workers handling business logic.

The difference with Rust and Go is they have better synchronization capabilities - where JavaScript largely forces you to clone data between threads.

So while you may still be messaging worker threads in Rust/Go - threads share memory which is fast and you have access to things like atomics and mutexes.

We can use Rust in the browser today with WASM and it's super cool - but without something like WASI, extensive thunking through JavaScript is required, plus there are issues with threading.

I hope that one day we can initialize a wasm module via a script tag with the browser offering a wasi interface

`<script src="module.wasm" type="application/wasi">`

And that browsers allow for threading without the restrictive security headers we have today
One less-secretive way I've seen pregaps used is for live recordings.

The crowd noise betwixt songs can be contained in a pregap, so that it is only ever heard when listening to the album straight-through (instead of in shuffle or track-program mode).

---

Another fun feature of audio CDs is indexes.

A disc can have 99 tracks, and each track can have some pregap (including track 1, as the article discusses). And each of these 99 tracks can be further subdivided with 99 index markers.

This gives a CD the theoretical ability to have 9,801 selectable audio segments.

Although realistically, I've only owned a couple of CD players that even displayed index numbers and exactly one CD player (a Carver TL-3300) that allowed a person to seek to a given index number within a track.

(And I've only known one CD to actually make use of indexes in any useful manner, which was a sound effects CD from the early 1980s that had a lot more than 99 sounds on it -- all organized by tracks, and sub-organized by index marks. I just can't think of the name right now.)
The Ancient Indian Art of Snakecharming
> You're conflating inmate population with convictions, the latter being more salient in a discussion of plea deals. As another poster mentioned, these statistics are methodologically biased towards more serious crimes with longer sentences.

The original context is this comment, which discusses a percentage of US inmates (not a percentage of convictions): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40906705

While it's true that people serving longer sentences represent a higher proportion of inmates than they do convictions, it also doesn't seem obvious to me which base denominator is more important. If anything, weighing convictions according to how serious they are seems more sensible than treating a small misdemeanor conviction equivalently with a murder conviction.

Furthermore, plea bargaining cuts both ways: the net effect of a plea bargain is often a conviction on a lesser charge, with less or sometimes no prison time.

> It's a question of what we value our prison system(s) for. I would hope for efficient deterrence and rehabilitation. That is, sentences likely to dissuade people from committing crimes, and best efforts to prevent offenders from offending again. You seem to think that the street-level homicide rate is too high, and I'd agree. I would say that, as such murders are generally crimes of passion or disordered thinking - instinct or illness (psychological, social) rather than reason - harsh punishments are not necessarily useful in deterring them.

I don't necessarily think the threat of incarceration deters common criminals very much, but it does separate them from the population, which is preferable to simply leaving them on the street.
> EDIT: And by "win" I mean not who the judge will side with, but who will end up chugging along fine financially and who will end up broke.

I can certainly agree with that sentence, but that is definitely not how the Register was referring to "win" (they clearly just meant the judicial outcome), so it's obnoxious to imply the legal ruling went Microsoft's way solely due to their greater resources.
Not all things fall under the purview of science, and not all things should. Whether someone makes claims of this being empirical is, for me and other pragmatists, aside the point: if it serves to help you understand yourself, or gives you some advantage in navigating interpersonal dynamics with others, it is valid. The proof is in the pudding. Nobody would question a literal pudding's empirical validity. They care only whether the recipe works.
Of the various recent uses of generative AI, Copilot is probably the one most likely to be found fair use and image generation the least likely.

But in any case, Authors Guild is not the final word on the subject, and anyone trying to argue for (or against) fair use for generative AI who ignores Warhol is going to have a bad day in court. The way I see it, Authors Guild says that if you are thoughtful about how you design your product, and talk to your lawyers early and continuously about how to ensure your use is fair and will be seen as fair in the courts, you can indeed do a lot of copying and still be fair use.
Ah, that makes sense. I would definitely not do 24k gold for anything with a smooth or regular texture. I was curious how durable my gold ring was, so gave it bit of a torture test. I did some weight lifting with it, grabbed some knurled pull-up bars, etc. I took it to sandy beaches, snorkeling, etc. I deliberately banged it against stuff while I was wearing it. Although it got a few good scratches, the weight was exactly the same afterwards: 24.2 grams. A few minutes with a hammer made it good as new. It seems like the metal is soft, but unlikely to separate from itself.

My condolences about the gold coin. I've made similar mistakes. The most frustrating bit for me isn't the damage itself, but the fact that every time you look at the thing, you're reminded of the time you messed up.
I still remember the awful Trespasser, which was rightfully called an "arm simulator". You were supposed to be some adventurer gal, bur in reality you were a disembodied arm. Terrible controls, too!
That’s a fun idea. I’ll have to see if I can run it on our Jira and Confluence instances to get better (or even minimal) ticket descriptions from the requirements.
If you have two libraries that aren't explicitly made to work with each other and operate on the same problem domain, being explicit about the translation layer between those two libraries is very much a feature, not a bug. That's absolutely a spot where verbosity and named enums will shine.
Ask HN: Recommend a legal service to review startup offer
About to get an offer from a startup and i am looking for a professional review to make sure there is no obvious catch, and the offer is pretty standard.

Also, should i expect the exercise window and % ownership be mentioned on the offer ? The recruiter did no seem to have those details.
Can you give me an idea of what you are using AI for currently?

Edit: Never mind, found the list you posted elsewhere.
Sounds like it was one officers word against another. If there was a corruption aspect to this, I didn’t see proof of where it was. It might look a certain way from our point of view now, but at the time I’m not sure it was so clear.

I very much like the concept of innocent until proven guilty and I want “proven” to be a very high bar.
I used to work at a place that did some custom hardware development. Usually one-off or very limited run. Any time we fabricated a case and plugged in off-the-shelf devices, certification was not necessary. If we did custom wiring we got ETL certified. I didn't run the process myself but I recall it being easy and not very costly (few thousand?) It's a barrier but a pretty low one. Our electronic work was like advanced amateur level and it still passed with minimal modifications.
and now a lot of them don't
I kind of get the snark, but I'm also not sure of an alternative. Extreme population density of Tokyo likely owe a lot to acquired ignorance. No way our brains don't go total schezophrenic being highly social all day long inside the Yamanote loop.
I guess that's true for westerners. Not sure people that got the short end of the american interventionist stick would agree.
You could use a sqlite database and use range queries using something like this:
https://github.com/psanford/sqlite3vfshttp
https://github.com/phiresky/sql.js-httpvfs

Simon Willison wrote about it:
https://simonwillison.net/2022/Aug/10/sqlite-http/
>It still turns you into a road hazard and puts you in a dangerous situation

How do you know?
You make assumptions about a system, that doesn't even is put in place. No car manufacture will use the forth way and risks getting sued if it doesn't work good enough.
Sony Killing Off Blu-ray Production Is a Mistake
If you accept those priors, men would be over-represented when attending college was rare and would become less dominant (and eventually a minority) when attending college became vastly more common.
Another news organisation notes the model is SR520BLSTC.[1] The SR520BLSTC user manual states R600a (isobutane) is used as the refrigerant.[1] Isobutane has a boiling point of -12oC.

There are numerous case studies of people dieing from isobutane inhalation, but generally the exposure is deliberate such as sniffing isobutane from a camping stove canister, or spraying air freshener directly into the nose.[3] Cause of death appears to generally be due to hypoxia as isobutane is an asphyxiant, or ventricular fibrillation caused due to exertion in breathing.[3]

The impacted person stated "I started to have rapid breathing and my muscles went completely weak".[1] These reported symptoms appear to align with symptoms referred to in case studies of isobutane inhalation exposure where rapid breathing occurs, and the strain from this rapid breathing is thought to in some cases be the cause for ventricular fibrillation.[3]

[1] https://www.9news.com.au/national/victorian-family-say-samsu...

[2] https://downloadcenter.samsung.com/content/UM/202109/2021091...

[3] https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/source/hsdb/608#section=Hum...
You, like most people, are unfamiliar with the metaphysical underpinnings and historical origins of astrology, so you have no real place to stand on the question of the validity of its claims. The only way you could is if you were intimately familiar with the topic.

Anyway, even if you take the metaphysical claims out of the equation entirely, as Carl Jung did, you can still derive great value from a system of thought-organization like Astrology. In Carl Jung's work he found that regardless of the claims about causation and personality, the symbological mappings of the zodiac represents something close to a map of cardinal archetypes, or you might think of them as psycho-social behavior blueprints that are intrinsic due to our evolutionary history and ALSO, as a secondary layer, culturally conditioned.

Point being... taking the stance you take, of accepting things only if they can be empirically proven, would prevent a person like you from ever gaining that insight / wisdom.

Your strength of intelligence is the greatest barrier to the growth of your wisdom.
Possible but that also means you have no way to convey the difference between the idea of wall and the unchangeable object that is the wall.

The idea of this experiment succeeding depends entirely on those in the experiment knowing the rules of the test.
Current AI functionalities: 1. AI-generated Titles 2. Smart Delegation 3. Duplicate Detection 4. AI Summarization 5. AI filtering 6. Automated Triaging

We are almost done working in 2 other areas
1. AI assistant while create a new issue ensuring the issue has enough information
2. Chat assistant to interact with the tool
The real question is how would I walk upside down? Come on, we discovered flight, this should be easier.
I'd add that it wouldn't be so outlandish to assume that any superficially and widely agreeable movement might just be astroturfing, considering how cheap and easy it is to persuade people in general, but also specifically by making them think everyone else feels the same, and how often the arguments just parrot whatever the various internet personalities happen to be saying about it without any additional insight.
Haha, same one. Thanks!
> But the “riddle” requires P to be exactly true or false.

Your choice of P (whether the continuum hypothesis holds) is still ill-defined! This is because the answer depends on the system of axioms one subscribes to. Or, if you feel like playing God, you may pick an answer (CH holds / does not hold) and find axioms that support it. (Which can be as simple as ZF + CH holds/does not hold.)
An audio CD is mostly arranged like a single continuous recording. Tracks are added on top of this via the Q subcode channel that gives information about the current location and the ToC stored in the lead-in area (also using the Q subcode channel). In the ToC, each track will have one more indexes that points at a specific location on the disc by minute, second and "frame" (represents 1/75 of a second, basically a sector).

If a CD is properly following the Red Book standard, index 0 will point to a 2 second pre-gap of silentce and index 1 will point to the actual start of audio of the track (additional indices are allowed, but not common). The purpose of the pregap is to make life easier for less sophisticated players that aren't able to seek to a precise frame on the disc. They just have to be able to hit a 150 frame region. However, just because the standard says the pregap is supposed to be 2 seconds and silent doesn't mean it actually has to be. Players generally don't care and by the time the format was popular, even inexpensive players could seek precisely. This allows you to stick audio data before a track that will be skipped by the player when it's trying to seek to that track. If you stick it before track 01, it will be skipped even when just playing the disc through unless you rewind.
Making AI Better Than Us – What Could Possibly Go Wrong?
> Heavy data visualizations, interactive infographics etc

If they are so heavy, shouldn't the vizualization be WebGL? The DOM is for hierarchical information.