skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> but making spreads narrower does mean less money goes to middlemen.

On individual trades. I would think you'd have to also argue that their high overall trading volume is somehow also a benefit to the broader market or at the very least that it does not outcompete the benefits of narrowing.
How does a company like NVIDIA operate without IP law? They are fabless. Everything they produce is digital, either in the form of software or in the form of chip designs. As far as I can tell, without protection from IP law (patents, copyrights, trade secrets) NVIDIA could not function as a company. They would have no means whatsoever at preventing a fab like TSMC from manufacturing clones of their devices and selling them, cutting NVIDIA out of the loop.
can't you put the flag before the subcommand? and can't you pass the flag when you launch the gui? i haven't been using it lately so i don't remember

defaults do matter, but defaults can be changed. if it only takes a four-line shell script to change them, they don't matter much
There's probably an S curve on this, right? At some point the super high level languages and frameworks that we use to conveniently create software quickly at the cost of poor efficiency, would have to peak, right?
The thing that put me off of Rye is that it strongly encourages you to use non-standard Python builds.

From their philosophy page: https://rye.astral.sh/philosophy/

> No Python Binary Distributions: CPython builds from python.org are completely inadequate. On some platforms you only get an .msi installer, on some you literally only get tarballs. The various Python distributions that became popular over the years are diverging greatly and cause all kinds of nonsense downstream. This is why this Project uses the indygreg standalone builds. I hope that with time someone will start distributing well maintained and reliable Python builds to replace the mess we are dealing with today.

And here is info about those particular indygreg builds.

https://gregoryszorc.com/docs/python-build-standalone/main/

It is, however, possible to choose a different Python.

https://rye.astral.sh/guide/toolchains/

I've never really experienced the problem they are describing. Any official Python build I've gotten from python.org has worked. Every normal old Python I've gotten from my distribution's package manager has worked. Every Python included with an official Docker container image has worked.

I'm sure their special builds will also work just fine, but their non-standardness gives me pause. There's even a list of behavior quirks. Why are we adding quirks to something that has no problems? And the fact that the rye philosophy seems so intent on using them, turns me off from it compared to the alternatives that sensibly default to using the Python you already have available on your OS.
Win + R and charmap gives you a quick reference to all your Alt codes (in the bottom left corner).
I have done multiple recordings with this and such a small change has made a massive difference in my workflow.

Even if I am just recording a single angle, just being able to have a portable view of my camera has eliminated something being messed up with the recording like lighting, angle, etc.

Previously I would need to make a recording, send it to my Mac, check it, and hope that I don't mess something up when I record again.

That being said, it's not perfect. I am annoyed that for some reason I can't do 60fps if I am doing 4k, even though natively the Final Cut Camera app can do this.

Also annoyed that from the iPad I can't do an audio only channel with a bluetooth source and instead just have to have my iPad camera turned on and connected to my microphone. Not the end of the world but annoying since Final Cut Pro multicam itself does support audio only tracks.

It would be awesome if in a future update I could preview certain effects in real time, like green screen keying. But that would be a bonus and not a complaint.

I am sure that for more established studios this is not really useful and they already had similar functionality with far more expensive setups, but for someone doing everything just by themselves this is an amazing feature that fixes my single biggest issue with recording videos.
1 PB of disk space would cost about $10K at this point in time. Not exactly unattainable. Looks like it would fit in a volume of space about the size of a standard refrigerator.

I'd be OK with both requirements.
Memory improvement > Strategies:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_improvement#Strategies

Hippocampal prosthesis, Cortical implant:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippocampal_prosthesis

Cortical implant:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cortical_implant

Digital immortality:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_immortality

External memory:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/External_memory_(psychology)
Glad it resonated with you!
this has worked since the beginning but i don't think many people know about it
They'll get better than fair deals. They will almost exclusively own all the available pricing information.
there are sites out there that aggregate local 3D printing companies and some let you submit a model to get automated quotes from a bunch at once. I found my favourite local printer/supply store that way a few years back. if we have them in Canada then I'd be surprised if there wasn't an equivalent in Australia.

there's also services like Shapeways which can print in basic or exotic materials and ship them
Russell conjugation: "I am firm, you are obstinate, he is a pig-headed fool."
Meta: Can someone with Linux/bootloader knowledge tell me whether most of these comments are as clueless as they seem?
How are they doing this? A few months ago it was a replacement for pip, now they basically rewrote most of Poetry? In a few months? Let alone Ruff being a rewrite of like fifty tools.

How is this even possible?
It doesn't seem reasonable to me to suggest that an average person would spend $10,000+ (and the time to maintain it) on a pirate archive, hence my comment.

On the other hand, contributing a TB or two to a torrent swarm is much more feasible for most people.

In any case, if you're okay with that, you should do it. Please report back in 6 months with how it's going.
FilamentPHP
Only if there's a moderate amount of effort put into optimization. Without it, it's easy to use bad algorithms or bad implementations and there is no limit on slowness.
It is not the reason. Microsoft is already providing Authenticator in multiple different app stores in China. Just check:

https://www.microsoft.com/zh-cn/security/mobile-authenticato...

At least, it is officially provided in Baidu, Lenovo, Huawei and Samsung app stores. And for other vendors like OPPO, Xiaomi, VIVO, I they also have this app as it is already widely used. Not sure whether it is submitted by Microsoft or is just copied by these vendors.

I think the main reason is some internal App will use Google services, which is not available in China.
Ohh ok it's dead - thanks - will do that next time
There are already documented/recommended timings for lights.

The whole point that people are bringing up is that there are a large number of documented examples of municipalities explicitly giving intersections with red light cameras significantly lower orange light times than all surrounding non-camera’s intersections. More over these municipalities have a documented increase in collisions, but collisions don’t cost the municipality anything, they just add a greater tax (through increased premiums) to all the people living in them.

I believe the correct course of action is cameras - red light, and speed, applied universally - however in the US where blatant corruption is legal it’s not reasonable to say “don’t break the law if you don’t want fines”, especially when again the whole reason this is up for debate is that timings for red light cameras are significantly shorter than non camera intersections. Eg what is legal in one intersection is illegal on the next and your only way to know is whether you get a fine in the mail.

This all ignores the part where fine based penalties for a crime simply renders crime legal for the wealthy. Again, if the intent is to ensure safety there would not be a subset of society for whom the law functionally does not apply, but the intent is very clearly revenue.
Yeah that seems to have been the issue - thanks so much
it's an interesting question, and hopefully after a few decades of repealing intellectual property laws, we can find out. 40 years ago it wasn't obvious that anything like nvidia could exist in the first place. possibilities include:

- no company like nvidia could exist, and for chip design and fabrication we'd be stuck with companies like intel, digital, micron, samsung, and texas instruments; but many other kinds of companies could exist that can't exist currently

- fabs like tsmc would hire design firms like nvidia to produce designs to fabricate; the division of labor would be the same as at present, but banks and investors would send their money to tsmc to pay to nvidia, rather than to nvidia to pay to tsmc

- fabs like tsmc would provide open-source pdks like the skywater pdk to anyone who was interested in designing chips. different open-source gpu designs would proliferate, and jen-hsun huang would be the head of a nonprofit foundation in oregon, spending his days coordinating the contributions of a worldwide network of volunteer electrical engineers and raising his children

- microelectronics fabrication machinery research would be focused on small job-shop equipment using electron beams rather than multibillion-dollar euv fabs, so you could get the chips of your choice fabricated in any downtown with five-day turnaround, much like printed-circuit boards. as before, different open-source gpu designs would proliferate, and huang would be the head of a nonprofit foundation in oregon

- gpu development and fabrication would be internally funded by companies that wanted to use large numbers of gpus, such as amazon and the nsa

of course, companies like nvidia don't depend on the particular 'intellectual property' law being weaponized against anna's archive, and things like anna's archive benefit companies like nvidia rather than threatening them
Yeah, we are not an extreme minority. My wife - who really doesn’t notice SD vs HD, let alone 4k, if the aspect ratio is correct for the screen - went ape when we got a TV with motion smoothing.

I said yeah, I hate that too, give me a few minutes to fix it, believe me I don’t want it.
Ticketmaster says customers' credit card information affected by data breach
> today's wide-screen monitors on desktop, line length is less of a worry

did you buy a large monitor just to full-screen a single text file?
No it won't.

Customers demand perfect uptime and companies are compelled to deliver it.

Which means you need to have a highly-available architecture which requires multiple servers across multiple disparate data centres. Especially when it's hosted in the cloud.
The experiment is basically "let's increase mice population until they start to die from overpopulation problems"... I'd imagine this would be quite hard to get approved by modern IRB (ethics review) committees.
What a horrible response
I believe you can use shebang since java 11 but you can't have the filename extension be .java.
> IP is more-or-less central to the US's economic and security strategy. Without it, the country loses a huge amount of power and influence in the world.

Good?
Exchanges put limits on cancellation rates as measured by a multiple of filled orders.

You have to allow strategies that can induce other strategies as by definition those also increase liquidity. It’s a difficult problem to explain to anyone except the very few people who can understand the extremely complicated feedback loops that result from bots fighting bots, however the regulators actually have access to counterparty tagged exchange event data and what is found when this is analyzed is that the net cost for liquidity that is extracted by market makers and short term traders from longer term participants is continuously decreasing not increasing. The system is becoming more and more efficient and not less. This is good for markets and the economy. There are also less people working in financial markets per capita than ever before, granted those who are might include a higher percentage of highly skilled and specialized and educated individuals than previously, which some might argue might be better used in some other industry, but that is rightfully not what the market wants.

There is absolutely no logical reason to “kill off this entire field” those sentiments are purely envy based reactions from those who don’t understand what is happening.
Is it really? I record multiple angles with 2 iPhones and a third track with a microphone and Final Cut Pro just syncs it all up via audio syncing (before this feature came out), and handles them not having the same start point just fine.

I have never had an issue with things not syncing properly unless there was a recording issue with one of them.

I imagine it could be a problem with video with no audio, but that seems like a trivial thing to fix with some cheap microphones attached to your camera.

It seems like this uses the same audio sync after the fact to get everything in sync, one time I was testing and all I did was tap the microphone and didn't say anything. Of course the phones couldn't sync with no other audio. I got an alert it was unable to sync the clips.
I was able to do it pretty easily with a mobile app, should be just as easy on desktop. You could even register custom “pages” for various parts of the desktop app.

https://github.com/Glimesh/glimesh_app/blob/main/lib/track.d...
That's how they train the League of Assassins so I think that generally ends in a Ra's al Ghul revenge scenario...
turn half the buildings residential and the problem is solved.
This comment is how to tell me you completely misunderstood CLOB market structure without telling me.
if you don't want the printing rather than tinkering with the printer to be your hobby, I'd go with Bambu labs. they're more expensive but they are absolutely unmatched when it comes to the out of the box experience.

I avoided buying a printer for years and years because I wanted to print things, not spend my time tuning and tweaking the printer. finally broke down last year and bought a Bambu P1S with the AMS for multi-material printing and it's been a revelation.

It's truly set and forget. Keep the filament dry, keep up with routine maintenance and you'll never have to worry about a failed print.
Taking a DIY Version of the Orient Express
As an example, you said they “ignored” the over-speed warning. I would bet it’s much more likely that there was too much going on in the cockpit, likely with confusing or conflicting information, that prevented them from making the correct assessment in a time critical environment. Expecting the humans to act perfectly when the system is working against them is as bad of a design assumption as assuming your airspeed sensor will always act perfectly.
https://archive.ph/wXIVw
I think you have it wrong. I’m thinking that meta will be a small llm provider and apple will license their llms.
> That eliminates all of the function call overhead and may also enable further optimizations (dead code elimination, constant propagation, etc.).

AFAIK, the speedup is almost never function call overhead. As you mention at the tail end, it's all about the compiler optimizations being able to see past the dynamic branch. Good JITs support polymorphic inlining. My (somewhat dated) experience for C++ is that PGO is the solve for this, but it's not widely used. Instead people tend to avoid dynamic dispatch altogether in performance sensitive code.

I think the more general moral of the story is to avoid all kinds of unnecessary dynamic branching in hot sections of code in any language unless you have strong/confidence your compiler/JIT is seeing through it.
>and they apply to rich people

Nominally. The magnitude of the fine matters, because the magnitude of the wealth available to pay the fine is notably higher than any given other person also subject to it. Hence the original quote.

>No, gentrification is not "equivalent" to camping

"both corrupt existing urban streetscapes to the best of their respective financial abilities". "Look it up" is not a get-out-of-jail-free card.

This is what I mean when I say that they've already gotten to you, and that you're beggaring the question. The causal relationship between wealth (which is acquired, at best, amorally) and "things that are punished/rewarded" is that wealth allows one to set those rules themselves. Naturally, the wealthy reward their behavior and punish what offends them. This is a disjointing of morality and criminality, per the whims of the rich, which is the entire point of the quote. Meanwhile, there is behavior common to wealth that SHOULD be punished, but isn't.
Does the answer to this lie with the tree PG discusses. If the goal is, "do something great." Then one should never quit.
Agree, the idea is good but wasn't able to navigate the website
I realize that, but much of the discussion here has mentioned engagement rings so I thought I'd chime in.

I ended up getting my wife two engagement rings and one band, one was a diamond that was from her grandmother, the other was a moissanite stone in a low-snag setting which would be easier for her to wear under gloves at work.
I disagree. The media has covered the training (or lack of it) extensively. It seems like you want to point to a singular cause. As with most mishaps with complex systems, it’s the result of a cascade of failures. Training is only one part of the problem. Fixing that is still only an administrative mitigation which is the least desirable form of mitigation when designing a safety system. Even if the pilots had additional training, it wouldn’t fix the root cause of the issue and is just asking for trouble because administrative fixes “only” require humans to act perfectly in accordance with their training, all the time.
MySpace vibes, I have absolutely no idea what's going on! (take that as a positive or a negative depending on what you're going for here)

All the images are insanely pixelated, if you can't get hi-res probably want to rethink the design around that limitation
Made a cool site with AI as a newbie
I am a backend service developer with no front-end development experience. I have never used modern front-end technologies such as react, and I don’t even know much about CSS layout. With the help of claude3.5 and gpt4, I built a complete website in less than a week, which includes several classic games and visualizations of common algorithms. AI changes the world!
Many Chinese goods are great. But if it's an end run around regulation, it is not in the US's best interest. Ralph Nader already fought this fight and won back in the 1960's with the Chevrolet Corvair. The Ford Pinto had the gas tank between the rear axle and the rear bumper, creating a death trap on rear collisions.

These are a few issues of goods from China being an issue in the past:

A) Toys with lead paint being recalled.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S02697...

B) Dog Food linked to China killing pets.

https://truthaboutpetfood.com/how-many-pets-have-ingredients....
Within a country people still compete against each other which is an in group. It’s very arbitrary how we define in group and out group. We create one when we see fit, even brothers can compete with each other
A new python dependency manager is like stumbling across a new JavaScript framework
Rough edges as they may be, I'm just going to put my chips on Hatch because it works well, the defaults for build/formatting/testing/publication are sane and built on other tools, I can actually read the source code easily enough to PR it (which I have done), and it's under the auspices of the PyPA. In short, it's a good facade.

Also, the CLI tooling doesn't even depend on using Hatchling as a build system, which is an understated benefit.

Unless one's got a particularly weird use case where they actually need to know the ins and outs of PEP 517 (Maturin/PyO3 with system specific dependencies, for example) it is going to be completely fine for the vast majority of packages with minimal additional configuration.
> Many projects don’t really talk about this. Instead you see a nice README that explains how to do things, but that README that doesn’t reflect the human pain and suffering it took [to get working]

This resonates.
Not sure, there might have been a fast path if you were booting to another Windows 10 install. The old legacy Windows Boot Manager also doesn't have the issue since it's much simpler and it executes in faux text mode before the OS boots.
"For the past two years, Google has provided information to over 1 billion users to help them make more sustainable choices annually through our products. We achieved this by offering sustainability features like fuel-efficient routing in Google Maps and more transportation options in Search, such as train routes."

"Fuel-efficient routing

By building AI models on the emissions profile of different vehicle types, fuel-efficient routing in Google Maps analyzes traffic, terrain, and the vehicles engine (gas/petrol, diesel, hybrid, or electric) to find the most efficient route. This may mean fewer stops for gas engines, routes favoring highway speeds for diesel vehicles, and maximizing downhill stretches for electric cars to boost regenerative braking all while providing the same or similar ETA."

https://www.gstatic.com/gumdrop/sustainability/google-2024-e...
Line 52,000 and x of what file?

I didn't find any file with that many line's yet, still searching but I doubt it exists unless it's in a different repository.
The problem is from my view, that people have the idea of IP being some sort of the American Dream ingrained in their heads that they can't even reason about anything else.

Maybe it depends on which people you ask, but I don't think the American Dream is about IP at all --- but mostly freedom and independence.
Obligatory indeed. No need to water it down - both are still highly relevant for python
These commenters have no clue what they are talking about. You don’t need to worry about hostile behaviors in the way they claim. These HN individuals are not domain educated and are spouting highly uninformed nonsense. Silly ideas like market orders take liquidity and limit orders provide it show an extremely rudimentary familiarity with only basic terminology of the field and with no understanding of the extremely dynamic and complex nature of modern capital markets. For instance they don’t realize that most longer term managers execute as much as 80% of their orders as passive limit orders, yet they are the ones that are actually liquidity demanders not suppliers.
I like pixi (https://pixi.sh/latest/). Let's me pin python version, install packages from conda and PyPI. And also written in Rust.
> What?

The context you're missing is in your post's GP. That poster holds a std::shared_ptr<bar> (for whatever perfectly valid reason) and wishes to pass it to foo(). However, he declares it as foo(const bar &) because the callee does not need to share in the ownership of the shared_ptr. That means it gets called as foo(*p.get()).

> scope based ownership

That's the incorrect assumption that you came to. Obviously if bar is only used for stack-based scope variables, no shared_ptr is needed.
You're right, of course, those shouldn't be our options. But that's just how it is. If you aren't willing to stop playing, the game will never end.