skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you accept a couple of other facts its even worse.

Presuming you accept iq or related tests of cognitive ability as useful, (even if not capturing the entirety of human qualities) and you accept that males have higher variance in cognitive abilities, more around the extremes of low and high cognitive abilities, whereas women on average fall closer to the mean, then if higher education was based on ability you would expect to see more men in higher education.

This is if course, verboten speak. I think as a society we have a lot to unpack.
I do love the idea of a dedicated compiler handling my builds. Even with the most modern build tools today, large web applications can take minutes to build which doesn't include type checking, linting and testing. If you're not prioritizing build times as your app grows, this can quickly balloon.
It's because the author doesn't know why they should use images in an article, they just do. SEO and bad coffee table books killed everything.
i'd go the other way. you might lose some "subscribers", yes, but in their situation it's less about subscribers and more links and serps. in this case, i'd go the simplest possible, especially with their goals being improving writing and building a personal brand

if the goal was dominate seo for a specific niche, yes definitely separate it out. google will reward you for staying on-topic.

> most traffic is coming from me sharing links to new content, or people searching for a particular thing that is indexed by Google, thus leading to a specific blog post
I've been working on a crawler recently and honestly you need the flexibility middleware gives you. You can only get so far with reasonable defaults, crawling isn't a one-size fits all kinda thing.
> Who's at war with the US?

We are not in a direct conflict with Russia. But Russia has invaded a neighbor in order to steal the land, people and property. And is currently bombing children hospitals in the process of achieving its goals.

We are at war with the idea that in this day and age, this is normal and OK.

Since WW-II, the world has lived in "relative" safety. No national boundaries have been changed by force. Russia is not on-board with this plan and wants to go back to the old way of expanding borders.

We are at war with this ideology.
> The reason I'm not free to assault others is because I'm directly causing them to lose their right to life and/or well-being. Whereas speeding merely creates a risk of harm, not harm itself.

And speeding is illegal. So it seems we as a society have agreed this is not a violation of personal freedoms.

Your argument here is really "speeding is okay and speeding creates risk to others, therefore I should be able to create risk to others"? Do you see how maybe that doesn't work here? Let's start with: "speeding is okay" isn't in evidence. That's the thing you're trying to prove, so you can't just start by saying it's true.

> Almost anything could be argued to create a risk of harm to others, including driving itself. If we outlawed driving, we would certainly be saving a lot of lives.

This isn't an honest argument. Obviously there's some tradeoffs involved, which you know.
Vim plugin inside PyCharm
We tried different approaches, we made a recent change where we started using cohere for re-ranking and embedding which did give really good results.

Happy to create an account for you to try it out. harshith [@] tegon.ai
Correct. A different thread is good too, as long as they are separate resources from the main DOM.
That doesn't contradict anything I said. If the homeowner built a taller structure, you couldn't fly your drone in what used to be class G airspace. If you built a giant dome over somebody's yard, a court would order it taken down. The fact that you're able to do certain things with your drone is because of a presumed right of way the drone has, and that right of way is time-variable.

Separately, the FAA's powers aren't absolute. A drone operator's restrictions when operating as a backyard nuisance are all those which the FAA inflicts _in addition to_ any other applicable laws, regulations, and common law. Even if the FAA classifies that airspace as class G, and even if the FAA doesn't prevent hovering an inch over the ground, you'll be in hot water with the rest of the court system if you do it too long, too often, or for the wrong reasons. Even the FAA would be on your ass if you were reckless with your drone in a residential area (mentioning for completeness; your hypothetical didn't imply recklessness).

Highlighting one way things can get messy, suppose you do that hovering trick and a homeowner doesn't like it. They're free to place a net over your drone (for the sake of argument, suppose it has some sort of rigid supports so it doesn't fall into your drone blades and cause damage). What befalls the drone will likely boil down to "unclaimed property" laws -- you'll likely get it back unharmed, eventually (if you take the right steps), but your day of flying is ruined.

More generally, as I said, the homeowner owns the airspace above their home, and there exists a presumed right of way for certain activities in that airspace. The further you tread from the idea of "when flying you have to pass over _somebody's_ home," the murkier the legal waters get.

Maybe one last idea for now: even in that presumed right of way, not even commercial flights are exempt from the fact they're infringing on your rights. Just the existence of noise and turbulance from an excessive number of nearby planes can suffice (and has sufficed) for landowners to be compensated for the fact that they can't reasonably use their land anymore (and usually the land is condemned and goes through some other unimportant details). The compensation comes, transitively, from the infringing flights (usually more directly from whichever airport or municipality caused the problem, but that incidental cost is _slightly_ trickled down to the rest of the system).
Under JR's definitions 150% capacity means people have enough space to read a newspaper. It's 200%+ that is the image of Japanese people being pushed onto the train by the white gloved staff.
RouteLLM: A framework for serving and evaluating LLM routers
Awsviz.dev simplifying AWS IAM policies
Sometimes, reading AWS IAM policies can be tough for me. I prefer visuals, so I often use the IAM Policy Simulator. To make things even easier, I built a small tool that turns IAM policies into simple graphs. awsviz.dev is a good tool designed to help users visualize, analyze, and improve their AWS IAM policies.

More details: https://medium.com/@Bohr/introducing-awsviz-dev-simplifying-...
I think that decision is much narrower than "market impact". It's specifically about substitution, and to that end, I don't see a good argument that Co-Pilot substitutes for any of the works it was trained on. No one is buying a license to co-pilot to replace buying a license to Photoshop, or GIMP, or Linux, or Tux Racer. Nor is Github selling co-pilot for that use.

To the extent that a user of co-pilot could induce it to produce enough of a copyrighted work to both infringe on the content (remember that algorithms are not protected by copyright) and substitute for the original by licensing in lieu of, I would expect the courts to examine that in the ways it currently views a xerox machine being used to create copies of a book. While the machine might have enabled the infringement, it is the person using the machine to produce and then distribute copies that is doing the infringing not the xerox machine itself nor Xerox the company.

Specifically in the opinion the court says:

>If an original work and a secondary use share

>the same or highly similar purposes, and the secondary use

>is of a commercial nature, the first factor is likely to

>weigh against fair use, absent some other justification for

>copying.

I find it difficult to come up with a good case that any given work used to train co-pilot and co-pilot itself share "the same or highly similar purposes". Even in the case of say someone having a code generator that was used in training of co-pilot, I think the courts would also be looking at the degree to which co-pilot is dependent on that program. I don't know off hand if there are any court cases challenging the use of copyright works in a large collage of work (like say a portrait of a person made from Time Magazine covers of portraits), but again my expectation here is that the court would find that while the entire work (that is the magazine cover) was used and reproduced, that reproduction is a tiny fraction of the secondary work and not substantial to its purpose.

Similarly we have this line:

>Whether the purpose and character of a use weighs in favor

>of fair use is, instead, an objective inquiry into what use

>was made, i.e., what the user does with the original work.

Which I think supports my comparison to the xerox machine. If the plaintiffs against Co-Pilot could have shown that a substantial majority of users and uses of Co-Pilot was producing infringing works or producing works that substitute for the training material, they might prevail in an argument that co-pilot is infringing regardless if the intent of github. But I suspect even that hurdle would be pretty hard to clear.
This is a specious argument. It is impossible for us to gesture at the works of art that do not exist because of draconian copyright. Humans have been remixing each others' works for millions of years, and the artificial restriction on derivative work is actively destroying our collective culture. There should be thousands of professional works (books, movies, etc.) based on Lord Of The Rings by now, many of which would surpass the originals in quality given enough time, and we have been robbed of them. And Lord Of The Rings is an outlier in that it still remains culturally relevant despite its age; most works will remain copyrighted for far longer than their original audience was even alive, meaning that those millions of flowers never get their chance to bloom.
Photopea?
There's another problem though: if you only allow compassionate, empathic people to be police, you won't have any police in America. Those kinds of people don't want to be police, especially in a country with so much gun violence and much of the population armed and apparently having sporadic mental problems and where violence is such a normal part of daily life. It takes a "special" kind of person to want to be a cop in that kind of environment.

It's very different in peaceful, gun-free countries.
Kind of expected this response. Sometimes self reflection is also an option.
This description makes it sounds like large areas of computer science are just goofy, meaningless, games.

But what's really happening is that "infinity" is standing in for "approximate, eventual, steady state behavior for sufficiently large N, larger than any specific one-off gimmick you might think of".

In the real world, though, those gimmicks are important, and the constants and low-order terms ignored in a Big-O comparison are important to real world performance.

There is constant tension between "big enough problem that the contant factors don't matter", and "small enough problem that it conforms to the (often implicit) of what 'constant' means (example: 32bit ints masquerading as integers)"
Broken was first released as a 2-disc set. It was still in a many-fold Digipak case, but also included was a 3" mini-CD that had Suck and Physical (You're So).

The regular-sized CD looked about identical to the 99-track version, but had only 6 tracks.

(It was expensive to do this, and was never intended for long-term production. Later versions were generally as you describe.)
Boo, only rated for 22 years of nonstop use :P
I’ve taken to follow only blogs with RSS feeds.

So, if you provide separate RSS feeds for different topics, I would be more inclined to subscribe to those of interest to me.

But if the RSS feed is a firehose of low signal to noise ratio for our overlapping interests, I’ll soon unsubscribe.
Do Framework have an ARM offering? Or is it on the cards?

I don't see it at first glance, that would peak my interest.
Thanks - they opted to melt both down and poured around a synthetic opals for a new set.

Plus a new "can't hurt myself with this if I tried" ring for any time spent outside.
Specifically I am talking about the inaccurate model that there is no sex differences and the idea of male and female genders are socially constructed.
That's really cool! I love iA Writer, it's so pleasing on the eye, and I really enjoy the focus mode. This reminds me of some of those writing devices from the early 2000s that did nothing but save text.
Related repos:

https://github.com/OrionReed/scoped-propagators

https://github.com/dennishansen/holograph
It's complicated no disagreement here. But I'm not sure what I should take away from this with respect to my comments...any suggestions?
No, but a RISC-V partner-made mainboard was just announced.
I can't help but think of deep sea divers using helium as part of their mix, and talking in chipmunk high-pitched voices.
Desktop Destroyer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJQRBpZKI3g
> as soon as I upgrade, no 6-18 month migration required

Maybe not a 6-18 month migration, but you will have a similar wait for Atlassian to deliver something approaching functional.

Of course this doesn’t matter to the leaders that can now claim their ticket tracking is AI enhanced, but the net value of the feature at that time is negative or zero.

Otherwise I agree though. Frustrated Atlassian customers do not move because they really wanted AI.
> Unlike most LLMs, Github copilot can trivially solve their copyright problem by just using only code they have the right to reproduce.

Absolutely not trivial, in fact completely impossible by computer alone. You can't determine if you have the right to reproduce a piece of code just by looking at the code and tags themselves. *Taps the color-of-your-bits sign.*

* I can fork a GPL project on Github and replace the license file with MIT. Okay to reproduce?

* If I license my project as MIT but it includes code I copied inappropriately and don't have the right to reproduce myself, can Github? (No) This one is why indemnity clauses exist on contracted works.

* I create a git repo for work and select the MIT license but I don't actually own the copyright on that code and so that license is worthless.
Seeing as so many of these comments are related to battery replacement costs, I wonder if this will cause Tesla to take a larger hit than most automakers in the models where the battery is part of the frame. Are these even replacable?
JPMC bough First Republic and already I’m ready to leave. Fees are high and many, and there’s no direct relationship like there was with SVB or FRB. Just a call center.
If NP somehow was proved to be P, with a likely value being something like O(n^(10^10^10)) or much larger, would the actual constructive reduction be at all useful?
They only have that power when there's an actual emergency, such as a fire. That doesn't happen too often.

Also, whatever power they do have, they don't seem to abuse, because no one ever complains about the firefighters abusing power.
I tried to click on the gear icon, thinking it was settings menu. It's not very clear that it's an icon associated with the post.
That is entirely orthagonal to the issue. NodeJS can be Fast.
The Autobahn has lower accident and fatality rates than U.S. interstates with similar levels of traffic and yet portions of it have no set speed limit at all.

The question is not of speed but speed-related policies and their effect in practice, not in deductively reasoned theory.
Thanks for mentioning this! I just discovered one of his pieces was probably the inspiration for Ride's Going Blank Again Album cover art.
That doesn't even attempt to answer the question.

What does "consciousness doesn't change" mean?? Like, there's zero change in the state of it?
"It’s also compatible with all of our existing Framework Laptop 13 and Framework Laptop 16 models, so you can pick it up in the Framework Marketplace and upgrade the laptop you already own"

It's nice to see this in a world where the status quo is soldered-in unfixable hardware.
Don’t you think some users may want this as it puts less strain on your eyes? Especially, if they spend a lot of time reading Hacker News.
Audio CDs were never ripped/transferred as ISO files. ISO-9660 is a filesystem that came years later, and Redbook audio CDs simply do not contain files.

If you want to look at the structure of a whole audio CD, then one way is to rip it with a decent tool (perhaps cdrdao or EAC) and generate a bin/cue file pair as an output.
There’s something to be said for this approach

Once my company instituted a per diem limit for meals while travelling, I stopped eating cheap food and would deliberately spend exactly the limit to spite the penny pinchers
Really appreciate the thoughts. The places where we believe AI matters a lot is

1. Ensuring ticket has enough information
2. Offloading some amount task before someone picks it.

These are the 2 key areas we are focusing and we will launch some features around these in the coming weeks. Would love to hear if there are some other places you feel we can focus on?
An assumption you're making here that you can even write an adapter layer for the V2 API. There may be things you wish to _remove_ in the V2 API. V2 does not always mean "add more stuff", it can often mean rethinking "what stuff" is provided.
Melior in Latin is "better", or "better off". So this software is betterator.

This amuses me.
they also have more resources to ensure they covered their liability surface before any legal case materialized

aka the plaintiffs were wrong and had no idea what they were talking about
Three meta-level points:

(1) Public discussion in the web about what is, has and will happen in global / security / foreign politics is completely broken.

(2) The reason is not and cannot be one-sided. However it may be better to think of groups with "mind control" powers and entities with not than any nation states or international organizations.

(3) I have never seen an attempt by anyone to do something about this; it seems that hope of rational (web) discussions and analysis is, has always been, and will for foreseeable future buried by whatever this is.
Popper's three worlds is one of my favorites to lay on science fans, because they typically love them some Popper, and an enemy in their own ranks is just too good to go to waste!! :)
Which are often few, far between, and quite short. If there's any kind of traffic coming the opposite way you can miss your chance over and over again.
With the addition of the new display the main things holding me back are battery life and fan noise, which are reportedly still issues with the 13”. Both need to a decent step up from my current Linux/Windows laptop before buying one makes any sense.
It certainly feels that way with teachers but how do we get the data to know?
When you talk about symbolism, it really doesn't matter if you can see the solder seam. Yes, of course a good jeweler doesn't leave visible seams. (Heck, a mediocre one doesn't either)

But the message of a cast ring is "it never had a beginning or an end. It's forever"

And if you read OPs post, they care about symbolism.
Note that “open-source” does not imply anything about quality, or your entitlement to that. As was already noted they’re selling access to a cloud product that you are entirely welcome to use if you do not want to think about how the code works.
People conflate legal tender/money/currency/stock/accounting unit/medium of exchange/digital token/etc...
Why? Are easter eggs like this harmful to consumers or something?
> [T]here does, however, have to be either a GPS and/or camera pointing outwards (that could be used to ID location) in order to know what the current speed limit is for the drivers given location.

Used by whom? The mechanic who services my car?

I see the problem if the location data is being broadcast to some central server... so don't do that. But that's not necessary for implementation. The ideal implementation in my mind would be to have speed limit signs broadcast speeds on some short-distance frequency and have cars read that passively: much more reliable than cameras, no violation of privacy.

Incidentally, cars broadcasting location to a central server is already a problem--they don't need speed limiting to do that. OnStar has been doing this for decades.

It seems like a lot of HN users who likely happily broadcast their location to Google Maps are suddenly worried about location privacy when it's used to prevent them from speeding. Minor convenience? Sure! Take my privacy! Can't put other people's lives at risk to get to my destination a few seconds faster? How dare you! Privacy is a human right!
I think you are massively overthinking things. One of the items you mention is "self-improvement". We can all relate to that.

Ignore SEO and all that shite and do you. Quite literally: you do you. Don't equivocate and fiddle around. Dump your thoughts on the world.

Did Shake that fucking spear bloke give a shit about SEO? No. What about a Yank wot said "Four score years and ..."

Keep us informed.

PS URLs of your blogs please!
Sigh. I am sorry to hear that. And not surprised.

(You can approach "how they think" as a question with strict rubrics fwiw, but it's a somewhat uphill battle. And not one you can win as an M1, usually)
The road towards ARM is very rough for those who do not control the entire ecosystem around the hardware.

Microsoft is on their second attempt, and they have much more sway over their ecosystem than Framework ever will. The magic Apple was able to achieve is almost entirely due to their iron-fisted control over their ecosystem. It's one thing to have a killer chip, but if nobody supports it, it's DOA...
Power consumption on the RP2040 is quite poor, actually; there's much better parts to use if you care about that.

If you just want a really cheap ARM microcontroller, Puya has some parts like the PY32F002A in the <$0.10 range. Single core, lower Fmax, and fewer peripherals than the RP2040, but the price is hard to argue with.
> Edit (re: move the goalpost): If you want to play fallacy bingo, then you were the one that actually placed the goalpost

This is false.

This is the ancestor comment that set the goalpost with the statement that "95% of US inmates are on plea deal". Neither that comment nor any of its ancestors were mine: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40906705

And it's rather rich of you to accuse me of dishonesty when you're the one providing misleading and unrepresentative statistics by focusing on federal inmates in particular.
Exactly. I just don’t see Russian disinformation agents using it out of respect of Gogol. Unless we take the idea of fighting against Poles, representing the West, from Taras Bulba?
Its even simpler, iD is owned by ZeniMax. ZeniMax is owned by Microsoft.. who would they even sue?
Sam Altman's list is still my favourite: https://blog.samaltman.com/the-days-are-long-but-the-decades...

It echoes much of the things in this thread, but if you're ambitious and looking for advice, it's also got plenty of advice.

I do agree that it's important to enjoy your youth. Don't plan too much for 20 years from now because everything will change a lot.
I use it as my primary interface. I can't believe they haven't killed it.

I like it, it's useful, I rely on it, and it's from Google. How does it still exist?
Interesting.

Does anyone have a link to a particularly amazing circos chart that demonstrates the kind of story that it is best at conveying?
The bands get more than a small cut of the various fees, and especially the upcharge things like Platinum tickets.
The team at frontend masters are doing that well https://frontendmasters.com/blog/how-were-supporting-open-so...
"Fun fact, a ships captain is not the one piloting the boat,"

All ports and many transits require a Pilot.