skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Two very different things:

The language I would like to write in.

The language in which I would like to debug and maintain code written by someone else.
This ruling seems to open the door to a president being immune from, say, commanding SEAL Team 6 to assassinate a political rival.

“In its ruling, the Supreme Court decided there was no question that Mr. Trump enjoyed immunity from being prosecuted for one of those methods: his efforts to strong-arm the Justice Department into validating his false claims that the election had been marred by widespread fraud. That was because the justices determined that Mr. Trump’s interactions with top officials in the department were clearly part of his official duties as president.” [1]

One of the president’s official duties is to direct the military to take actions that protect the country. Biden can reasonably claim Trump is a threat to democracy, and can officially request him to be killed. Right? If not why not?

1: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/01/us/politics/supreme-court...
it’s supposed to be hard. not impossible. and it’s pretty clear at least to me that the authors of the constitution very clearly intended presidents like trump to be thrown out of office.
Yet another very important portion of reality that science hasn't gotten around to yet. Perhaps we'll find the answer a bit further out in the universe, or deeper inside matter.
This is the best way I've heard it put. The United States was founded to escape rulers who were above the law, and the Constitution was created to protect it. For the justices who claim to be primarily driven by the constitution to make this ruling seems bizarre, and it's hard for me to see it in any other way than partisan bias.

The president does not need this power and protection. The past 2 years are the first time this 'prosecuting a former president' thing has been an issue, and there are lots of unusual circumstances around it. To give the president such power in response to this seems like a very, very, very bad idea.

Presidents do not need protection from the people, the people need protection from presidents.
If you go through the guide at the first link, it will pretty much set you up with the basics to work on vectorization, and once done, you can look at what CoreLib does as a reference (just keep in mind it tries to squeeze all the performance for short lengths too, so the tail/head scalar handlers and dispatch can be high-effort, more so than you may care about). The point behind the way .NET does it is to have the same API exposed to external consumers as the one CoreLib uses itself, which is why I was surprised by your initial statement.

No offense taken, just clarifying, SIMD can seem daunting especially if you look at intrinsics in C/C++, and I hope the approach in C# will popularize it. Good luck with your experiments!
There's not much in geopolitics that isn't downright insulting. Different flags, same scumbags.
I read it this morning. Which part would you have quoted? I picked that part because it seemed like the clearest summary.
A stellar explosion may add a temporary 'new star' to the night sky this summer
It's one thing to homebrew something on your own after reading Elektor or Dr. Dobb's... it's another thing to homebrew up a sport on your own that involves floating on a homemade board in the sea. A true hacker!
Show HN: WhoDB – Streamlined, Lightweight Database Management with a Sleek UI/UX
Hello fellow hackers!

I'm excited to share the launch of WhoDB by Clidey. We are hoping to redefine the user experience with database management. Going away from the LLMs hype, we really just want to make developers' lives better!

WhoDB is written in Golang, is lightweight, and supports a variety of database backends (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite3, MongoDB, & Redis).

WhoDB offers:
* Better UX: Intuitive and easy-to-use interface.

* Faster Performance: Built with GoLang for exceptional speed and table virtualization in the Frontend.

* Schema Visualization: Interactive graphs to visualize your entire database schema.

* Inline Editing & Preview: Easily preview cell or edit inline

Why did we build it?
* User Experience First: Imagine Adminer but built for 2024, with a modern, user-friendly interface.

* Broad Support: Fully supports PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite3 MongoDB, Redis, and other SQL and NoSQL support coming soon!

* Completely Open Source: WhoDB is entirely open source, so you can get started right away and contribute to its growth.

You can run WhoDB with a single Docker command:

docker run -it -p 8080:8080 clidey/whodb

WhoDB is in active development and thus some things will be rough around the edges. We have docs at https://github.com/clidey/whodb/blob/main/docs/docs.md and welcome any suggestions!

If you find any issues, please report them here, on Github, or contact us at support@clidey.com.

https://github.com/clidey/whodb
I remember being in college and being able to listen to half the weather satellite signal with my handheld radio (it was quite a bit wider than my radio could handle with just narrowband FM receiver). It felt super cool to have that level of access to what such an advanced piece of tech was seeing. Is it even possible for an amateur to listen to these new birds or are they so complicated only NOAA can process the signals?
Yeah but your argument ignores the fact that this all has to be hashed out after the fact. Before this ruling, presidents could ask counsel if something was legal or not (ex: there are tapes of Trump doing this during his attempt to steal the election) and they could answer based on statutes and case law. Now the answer always has to be "depends on what judge we get, there are no precedents". Jackson makes this argument in her dissent, and I think she's right that this is a sea change in the relationship between the US and its president.
Any way to get in touch with you?
> doesn't translate into strongly typed code for them, so we lose a number of kids .. when they believe code is too hard

I can't make sense out of this; what does it mean, in different words?
We are still paying the price for Watergate. The Saturday Night Massacre was Nixon's attempt to use his executive authority to prevent his investigation. The loyalist who ended up being his third AG of the day was Robert Bork. First Ford declined to prosecute, then Reagan nominates Bork to the SC and suddenly SC appointments become combative partisan affairs
> Last July, the journal retracted 81 papers from another special issue,

And they learned nothing in the year since, except to try far fewer articles.
Why have "guest-edited issues" if as a rule they are going to undermine the work of their guests?

Obviously they need a period of co-editing before they are willing to trust guest editors.
> Sure. Until recently, they were losing. De-politicising the courts could be electorally advantageous for both sides.

I think you overestimate how much the political apparatus cares about the long-term. It's hard not to agree that de-politicized courts are good, more or less, for everyone. But the right-wing won a generational battle for the Supreme Court. There is no incentive for any right-wing politician currently alive to propose that kind of change today; if anything, the political machine would call them out for proposing that their party loosen its grip on the reins.

We'll see how the right-wing feels after this next election. It's not a secret that whoever wins in 2024 will likely get to appoint several new justices, though the court as a whole will almost certainly remain right-leaning. If that control does start to erode, though, expect to hear much discussion about making the de-politicization of the courts a priority.
Research / development project? The karma system in a community that downvotes AI comments provides quite good (and free) feedback about whether comments are perceived to be written by an AI, or not..
You changed both title and text after I took time to review your website and create feedback. I'm deleting my feedback now.
That's a rather misleading take. Reagan was threatened with impeachment twice--first by a group of eight representatives over his invasion of Grenada, and later by a lone Representative, Rep. González, over Iran-contra--but it never went anywhere in either instance. González later introduced two resolutions against George H.W. Bush over the Gulf War that were ignored. Those were promptly ignored and died in committee. There was a much larger push to impeach George W. Bush over Iraq and other behaviors, but even there, party leadership ultimately chose to squash the impeachment effort.

When you're talking about such a small number of representatives, it's tough to suggest that "Democrats" did anything as a political party. A few lone voices do not denote a party's position, especially when party leadership was against it.

For that matter, most all of those impeachment efforts at least had a degree of legitimate purpose. One might disagree as to whether actions such as circumventing arms embargoes via illegal arms deals to fund rebel groups prohibited by Congress or (potentially) lying about a foreign nation in order to justify a war are in fact impeachable, but it's difficult to argue that weighing the possibility of impeachment wasn't at least rationally justifiable.
Lochner made it impossible for the legal pragmatic of our country's ontology to recognize corporations and enterprises as autonomous entities that should have checks and balances for - and against - themselves AND other entities of the government, just as much as citizens do.

With how things shaped up, the innate de jure power struggle should have been "The People <> Legislative <> Judicial <> Executive <> Corporations"

We're still paying the price, as the Lochner era was incredibly myopic.
I wonder if Mexican executives are also cheaper

Maybe we should just buy from Mexican tractor companies instead if that's the case?
FYI: your page is just dead for me. I was curious what you were doing, but all your examples and the search box itself just lead to "Something went wrong with your request. You have nothing to worry about, please try again in a moment."
> If your language has bad defaults, you may have to ask for the right rounding mode explicitly.

Is the author implying Rust's default rounding behavior is a bad default? In what world is "ties to even" a GOOD default?
There was a time when Computer Science was what is Numerical Analysis today.
looks nice and would take some custom vinyl side-art and marquee nicely.. some states tax these things or have other oddball laws for them when put in certain public places
> Out of context this is quite reasonable and level headed.

That's why I'm opposed to making changes to the way the Court is selected and empaneled.

The fact that it's inconvenient for one party right now is irrelevant. It'll be inconvenient for the other party soon enough.

> In context of the hyper partisan landscape US politics are today, doesn’t seem likely without a supermajority opposition to be able to bring charges against a president, for official or unofficial acts that are crimes.

Good. If it were easy to bring charges against a President, then Presidents wouldn't be able to do anything they were elected to do.

The failure of that protection at the end of the term is one of the major reasons for the end of the Roman Republic. If you repeatedly make powerful political figures choose between prosecution and violence, it won't take long for one of them to choose violence.

The fact that we've peacefully transitioned between presidents ~45 times is honestly rather amazing.
This is what the internet should be about. I love it when I go online and find something interesting and on the surfacing seeming ridiculous like this and being able to use the internet to deep dive.
He also was probably not financing the purchase with a mortgage.
> These are all special instances of a more general computational problem called the hidden subgroup problem. And quantum computers are good at solving the hidden subgroup problem. They’re really good at it.

I assume they mean the hidden subgroup problem for abelian groups? Later they mention short integer solutions (SIS) and learning with errors (LWE), which by my understanding both rely on the hardness of the shortest vector problem, corresponding to the hidden subgroup problem for some non-abelian groups. I haven't read into this stuff for a while, though
It's nothing about you personally, it's that this thread is filled with hundreds of bad takes and I actually can't keep up. The bullshit asymmetry principle is working hard today because actually doing the work of understanding the law takes time.

The short version is that Chevron was not a doctrine used in any and all cases where the law was ambiguous, it was always about whether an administrative agency's interpretation of the law was permissible. The subjects under consideration here do not fall under administrative law [0] and so Chevron would never have been relevant.

[0] https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/administrative_law
It sound like the guest editor had some dodgy qualities and peer review was questionable.

The thing that might be bad is having the individual author tarred with a retraction if they had nothing to do with the process. But I don't how academic records are evaluated at this point.
I think the number of newly branded millionaires and people who held millionaire status but lost it would be equally important for this data to be interesting.
He's taken a suspicious quantity of "gifts", you can look it up.
That's why "official" in in quotes. As in: "de-facto standard".
As they should, as that wasn't the issue before them.
Singapore Airlines 321: Is Extreme Turbulence Getting Worse? [video]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

SEEKING WORK

Product Designer | US, Europe, Asia | Remote

.

Project walkthrough: https://tinyurl.com/5xw3pym9

More projects: https://raigo.design/index

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/raigolilleberg/

Email: hi@raigo.design

.

Keywords: Product, Design System, Design Process, Analysis, Design/Accessibility, Design Audit, Design Consultancy, Startups, B2B/B2C, Figma

Location: US, Europe, Asia

Remote: Yes

Relocate: Occasional, in-person fly-overs

Seeking: Freelance/Contract, Long-term

Availability: Flexible to start now

Interest in: Health, Wellness, Personal growth, Science and Tech with Gen-AI

.

Freelance designer (and consultant), focusing on digital product experiences, processes and systems, with a practical understanding of both business and front-end development. Self-taught. Worked with startups and companies of various sizes, stages and teams in Europe and the US.

Based in Europe (EU) within UTC time zone. Work remotely and be able to potentially overlap 4 hours with other time zones. In the case of need, always open to discuss occasional in-person flyovers.

Invoice through my company (registered in Estonia, EU), with weekly-monthly based rates.

.

Thank you for your time, till soon!

Raigo Lilleberg

hi@raigo.design

https://raigo.design

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Location: Manchester, UK

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: C#, .NET, React, JS, some Typescript, MSSQL, Gatsby

Résumé/CV: on request - I don't have linkedin since the breach

Email: garethterrace at gmail

I'm a full stack dev, I work best in C#/.NET with React and really like smaller companies. Starting to look for my next opportunity after 10 years working on Timetastic. Only decided to start looking today, so still writing up the CV!

Cheers
The court uses the language "in the first instance". So it sounds like you can use anything generated by the crime itself, but you can't dredge up other conversations about the crime.

Nixon ordering an illegal action is a crime, and Nixon destroying evidence was definitely a crime, so evidence of either would be game.
I’d be very uncomfortable surfing wild spots. The dude is a legend.
Re: Gatorade’s 63% monopoly,
I’ve recently thought about how quickly Prime went to mass market. It seems like it blew up on YouTube and stores couldn’t keep it in stock.

Then all of the sudden, it’s sitting next to Gatorade in huge volumes at Costco.

I’ve never seen a product so quickly “disrupt” a long-time monopoly. It remains to be seen whether it’s a fad or if they could actually compete with Gatorade, but it seems like they could, if anyone could.

To be clear, I’m personally not a fan of how companies like this use marketing (especially on YouTube) targeting young — impressionable — audiences, so I’m not necessarily rooting for either one of them (Gatorade is horribly unhealthy). But I have found it interesting at the very least.
Galactic Modeling Language: https://wiki.c2.com/?GalacticModelingLanguage
The UK parliament is not subject to judicial review. Judicial review in the UK only applies to crown corporations or specific public institutions. Such a position would be considered repulsive to the vast majority of Americans.
But if one really does believe the rulings are that bad and that they portend very bad things to come then a person should say as much. I can calmly and rationally say that these decisions are terrible. It’s not, in my opinion, hyperbole for me to say so. I could be wrong in my assessment but I don’t think I am.

For the first time in American history a select group of people are immune from the law as long as the acts occur while carrying out their jobs. That’s a big deal. I can see that soon someone will claim immunity because they carried out an order of the President and their immunity extends to those carrying out “official acts” of the President.
Might as well have been. It's easier to indict a conviction of a high ranking figure 4 times over than it is playing the political game of a successful impeachment.
Chapter-63-Commentary
Mexico has the same big metros like the US does, just look at Monterey and CMX

> but it's not a prudent or even realistic option for most people.

It may not be right now. But at the current rate of letting corporations do whatever the fuck they want, I wouldn't hesitate to do it if it makes economic sense. And if it ever gets to that point, shame on the US government

> I'm going to go on a limb and say even the bottom decile of Americans are better off staying here than trying to sneak into Mexico.

Citation needed. A lot of the people who enter illegally aren't even originally from Mexico. Also the economic climate of the US has changed since the 20th century
The git repo is on kernel.org nowadays with mirrors on repo.or.cz and GitHub.

But I think they mean here what the official git project ‘site’ is with docs and so on. And that is now https://git-scm.com/ and indeed as the article describes that was initially set up by GitHub people, to promote git
I appreciate you taking the time to talk me through this, SIMD has been an interest of mine for a while. I ran into issues and then when I went and looked at how the actual string class did it I stopped since they were doing tricks that required said access to the internal data. But this gives me a path to explore. I was already planning on looking at the links you supplied.

Thank you again.
Chief Justice Brett Kavanaugh writing for the 10/3 majority on June 30, 2028 "Well, ack-tually, the framers did not place term limits and congress has unduly restricted his constitutionally protected right to participate in our democracy. The candidate should be on the November ballot (or otherwise selectable by electoral college electors) in all 50 states"
I've had a good experience with JavaFX and I even managed to AOT compile two faily complex applications of mine. My advice would just be to stay away from FXML. Also use jlink to build a stripped down JRE for your application and package it with jpackage.
LeMay was a pussycat compared to General Thomas Power.

> Restraint? Why are you so concerned with saving their lives? The whole idea is to kill the bastards. At the end of the war if there are two Americans and one Russian left alive, we win!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_S._Power
Go gets it done and for years to come.
"Not involved" despite telling the crowd to "fight like hell" and conspiring to have metal detectors removed?

'Immediately' as in many hours after violence started, and his own children begged him to do something?
With regards to (b)(ii)(3), i.e. Trump's attempt to influence non-federal officials to select fake electors...

>> On Trump’s view, the alleged conduct qualifies as official because it was undertaken to ensure the integrity and proper administration of the federal election. As the Government sees it, however, Trump can point to no plausible source of authority enabling the President to take such actions. Determining whose characterization may be correct, and with respect to which conduct, requires a fact-specific analysis of the indictment’s extensive and interrelated allegations. The Court accordingly remands to the District Court to determine in the first instance whether Trump’s conduct in this area qualifies as official or unofficial. Pp. 24–28.

Which seems a key window for the lower court to send the case back up.

Trump attempted to influence non-federal election officials.

Trump had no Presidential authority to do so. (Elections being run by the states)

Ergo, that was not an official act.

Granted, the special counsel would have to prove that without using the Presidential personal notes... but it's still a pretty clear path given the non-Presidential documentation all the conspirators kept.

And it does make sense by the Supreme Court's reasoning: you can't restrict the President from running the executive branch, but you can hold him accountable for the things he does outside of the executive branch, which critically includes elections themselves.
Treatment Technologies & Insights (TTI) | Frontend Engineer | ONSITE | Los Angeles, CA. | https://tti.care

Treatment Technologies & Insights, Inc. (TTI) aims to improve treatment experiences and outcomes for cancer and chronic illness patients. We develop custom software and mobile applications to help patients manage their treatment and generate insights on their personal experiences with high acuity or chronic conditions.

We have aggressive plans to continually enhance our infrastructure, and due to ongoing partnerships and strategic growth, we’re seeking to grow our Engineering Team.

We are hiring:

- Frontend Engineer: https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/3181984512
Fair enough, but since I’m still starting out and unsure about the value of it, it would t feel right to charge at this point.
If it proves to be valuable of course I’d charge otherwise it wouldn’t be sustainable
music

movies

microcode (software)

high-speed pizza delivery
> Article III of the U.S. Constitution is incredibly brief [1].

So is the constitution. But I think what also matters a lot is things like the Federalist papers. Where these aren't explicit laws but are the motivations and philosophy behind them. Ruling by the letter of the law will always be tyrannical because no thing is perfect.

Federalist 78[0]

> The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation and validity ought, of course, to be preferred; or, in other words, the Constitution ought to be preferred to the statute, the intention of the people to the intention of their agents.

It's also worth mentioning here that this same document specifies that the judicial branch and executive branch are to remain distinct. That all the judicial branch can do is issue judgement, but are not capable of executing such judgement. I mention this because there is another question that arises if the one in charge of the executive branch is judged to have committed a crime by the judicial branch. But of course, this is back to the point that there are no global optima. There is no free lunch.

[0] https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed78.asp