skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
also somebody who's worked remote for the last 5 years partially due to disabilities; there's lots of us out there. like somebody else said, go to the linkedin profiles of the fortune 500 (maybe 1000?) companies and start applying to the ones that filter out only-in-office.

also honestly sometimes even if the profile doesn't explicitly say 100% remote, it can be if they want you bad enough. i got an exemption in my current place that's technically "hybrid only" ... wishing you best of luck.
Adding volume directly improves your cardiovascular physiology in ways that causally improve your performance and has been the bedrock of endurance training for decades across sports.

It's the most reliable way of improving performance to the point that increasing Zone 2 volume alone can drive huge performance improvements at sub-elite paces, much more than the 4% we're seeing from these shoes.

Adding ten miles will absolutely increase respiration and mental resilience, because every minute added taxes those faculties, and time on feet is a huge part of conditioning your lower legs to handle the volumes of really long distances. You can be cardiovascularly advanced but have trouble with longer distances without specific training, but training for marathons often improves your performance at every shorter aerobic distance.

If you want to improve physical strength, do strength training. Shoes won't do it for you.
Code reviews do find bugs
Ok. My misunderstanding was that this only applied to an administrative agency's interpretation of the law. That is my mistake. However, I still believe that gives a pretty large latitude for abuse considering the GOP is openly antagonistic to many of these agencies like the IRS and FDA.
I keep a notebook in my bedside drawer for that exact reason. I have/had no idea whether it was based on any science or just placebo, but the number of times I've been nodding off and suddenly had a really good idea or solved a problem I've been stuck on, led to my wife buying me a notebook because she was sick of me saying "I'll remember it in the morning" then... not remembering it in the morning.
I'm sorry, I can't read "unqualified partisan hacks" uttered as a phrase by someone I assume believes that "emanations from penumbras" qualifies as good constitutional law.

How exactly do you think a qualified, non-partisan judge should decide cases?
What's fun is that, as the use of SIMD in your example is useless, LLVM correctly completely removes it, and makes your "neon" and "fallback" versions exactly the same - without any SIMD (compiler explorer: https://godbolt.org/z/YWoMGoaxT).

As an additional note, aarch64 always has NEON (similar to how x86-64 always has SSE2; extensions useful to dispatch would be SVE on aarch64 and AVX/AVX2/AVX-512 on x86-64), so no point dynamically checking for it.
Guess the calm, not insane US leadership could potentially only last 4 years.

Hoboy, I hope there's not another round of Trump...
Location: New Jersey, USA

Remote: Preferably, or hybrid

Willing to relocate: Yes (US/EU Dual Citizen)

Technologies: Python, C#, C++, Kubernetes, Linux, NGINX, PHP, CI/CD, Unity, WWISE, Blender, Adobe

Résumé/CV: https://keehar.net/data/resume.pdf

Email: me@keehar.net

Hi! I have 2 years of professional experience having worked at IBM and another company as a Data Engineer/Software Engineer. I am looking for work as a Software Engineer, Full-stack Engineer, Game Developer, Audio Programmer, Graphics/Rendering Engineer, or similar roles.
Most of my hobbies have always revolved around a computer; 3d modeling, audio design, programming, building hardware: so I'm pretty quick to pick up new things, and come up with solutions.
Thank you.
Find AI | Senior Software Engineer | Remote + Async | Half-time / Fractional | https://usefind.ai/

Last week we launched Find AI on HN. Now, we're looking for an engineer or two with Rails experience to join part-time. We pay up to $150/hr and are entirely async and remote.

Learn more in our job post here:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ND0dpiUfBtZ-WmgUXnmdaa2p...
This could be luck of the draw. I'm at a Fortune 500 company, that isn't a "tech company", and for many years it was pretty boring. However, over the last several years certain people internally have been claiming we are now and tech company and started doing things they think tech companies do. This has resulted in a lot of work and stress, that ultimately doesn't seem to get us anywhere. They keep making us rebuild the same thing over and over again on new platforms. No one actually cares what platform it's on (it's an internal tool, and our internal customers just want reliability and consistency). But each new tech leader comes in, has us re-write on their platform/stack of choice, then they turn that "success" into a new position somewhere else, so we then get a new person that tells us to do it all again. We also have layoffs or re-orgs every 3-9 months, just to keep everyone on their toes.

I assume to escape this I need to go to a smaller non-tech company, but I assume I'd be exchanging one problem for another unknown one.
This is a good piece of info. I work in a fortune 50 with this, but I do some modernizing for the company, to get them away from mainframe
Old Sarum
We developed "geodns" for situations where you want to do DNS lookups from different regions around the world. For example, ycombinator.com returns different IPs depending on your location:

$ geodns ycombinator.com
108.156.133.117 Singapore
108.156.133.21 Singapore
108.156.133.25 Singapore
108.156.133.59 Singapore
108.156.39.26 London
108.156.39.61 London
108.156.39.62 London
108.156.39.64 London
13.32.27.123 Frankfurt am Main
13.32.27.47 Frankfurt am Main
13.32.27.51 Frankfurt am Main
13.32.27.80 Frankfurt am Main
13.35.93.12 Clifton
13.35.93.14 Clifton
13.35.93.46 Clifton
13.35.93.47 Clifton
18.239.94.100 Amsterdam
18.239.94.114 Amsterdam
18.239.94.33 Amsterdam
18.239.94.79 Amsterdam
99.86.20.42 Doddaballapura
99.86.20.54 Doddaballapura
99.86.20.64 Doddaballapura
99.86.20.96 Doddaballapura

https://gitlab.com/shodan-public/geonet-rs
Let's add a 3-strikes and your out! law. Thrice impeached Presidents get thrown out of office and need to sit in jail for 3 turns unless they roll a double.
(Obviously a joke, but is joke is exactly what our Supreme Court is making out of our Constitutional Republic)
Just before sleep is pretty good, but the shower is where I've had all my best ideas.
This is 100% backwards. Big business loves MS, they don't tolerate it. It's one simple ecosystem that every sysadmin and IT helpdesk person knows.

Let's consider a 1000 person org with 5 offices.

Here's their stack:

1 (or 2) DC's at each site

Active directory with 30 OU's and 100 security groups

A datacenter

A dozen LAN file shares with spaghetti permissions

1000 workstations (with paid licenses)

1000 email accounts (with paid licenses)

25 Sharepoint sites

100 Teams

20 Shared mailboxes

30 Distribution groups

100 GPO's defining server and workstation behavior/logon scripts/etc

AAD controlling user licensing, SSO, auth, dynamic groups, one way sync to local AD

7+ years of M365 and server backups (prob in the 100TB+ range)

40 TB of active data across the org

15 Hardware servers

50 Windows server VMs

20 Windows 10/11 VMs

15 Different industry specific softwares that REQUIRE Windows

Switches/routers/firewalls/VPNs using LDAP to auth

Dozens of automations using email/sharepoint/PowerApps/Flow/ToDo

And 40 years of inertia.

Tell the CTO/CIO that you think they should move to Linux and Gsuite and find open source programs to replace literally everything they do. Tell them they need to retrain their entire IT staff. They also need to redo every single workflow and SOP they have. You'll never be taken seriously again if you don't immediately start laughing and say "Just kidding, that would be insane!".

That's not even a "big" business. I don't mean to be rude but you have no idea what you're talking about.
This is so bizarre as a non-US reader, I have literally never heard of them. (Despite having heard of all the others in the “monopoly by market share” table)
The constitution says very little. Most legislation says very little. I don't think they are grabbing for power, they are just stating the obvious - this isn't covered, so I guess we'll cover it.
Not all experienced programmers become functional acolytes. See: Ken Thompson, Donald Knuth. They like procedural programming and prefer to model programs with imperative, mutable state, rather than pure functions that map one type to another.
No, the bribery would not be an official act, see footnote 3 of the opinion:

> in a bribery prosecution, for instance, excluding “any mention” of the official act associated with the bribe “would hamstring the prosecution.” Post, at 6 (opinion concurring in part); cf. post, at 25–27 (opinion of SOTOMAYOR, J.). But of course the prosecutor may point to the public record to show the fact that the President performed the official act. And the prosecutor may admit evidence of what the President allegedly demanded, received, accepted, or agreed to receive or accept in return for being influenced in the performance of the act. See 18 U. S. C. §201(b)(2). What the prosecutor may not do, however, is admit testimony or private records of the President or his advisers probing the official act itself. Allowing that sort of evidence would invite the jury to inspect the President’s motivations for his official actions and to second-guess their propriety

Admittedly it’s a bit contradictory, but still helpful I think. The pardon is the official act, and the president is immune from criminal prosecution (and legislation) of the form “it was a crime to give that pardon” without further qualification. The prosecutor cannot compel presidential records or testimony. All the other tools are still available to the prosecutor and the unofficial act of accepting a bribe is still a crime.
I've had some good ones loading the dishwasher too.

I think it is just that you're off doing something mindless.
> This sounds a lot like we're kicking the can of worms down the road.

> Now we have to define what content is allowed and someone has to decide if some action is contrary to that policy.

I mean that the social media platform has to be explicit about what they allow. It doesn't matter what social media platform wants to allow (provided it is legal) so long as they tell their users what it is.

> Finally, we have to define if something is contrary to the interests of users, meaning we have to define the interests of users... holy cow.

IANAL, but it seems to me this kind of thing already comes up all the time in things like contract law, employement law, unfair business practices, etc.

> I think less is more in this case. There are enough social media sites out there that you can dial in pretty exactly what you want to see, no matter your persuasion.

I agree. What I am proposing requires no new legislation, and merely requires us to enforce existing legislation more or less as it is written.
SIKE was probably the most exciting PQC algorithm available, if it hadn't been broken. It made it to the finals for a relatively brief time.

CRYSTALS also now has a possible attack proposed by a recent paper on a similar algorithm, so time will tell if any more of these algorithms is broken.
No. I think you're referring perhaps to executive privilege, which is something else altogether. While it is an issue to account for, saying official acts are inadmissible is far too broad.
The content is for free. I just strip out what I don't like. Very much like when I was young and cutting out car pictures out of magazines. Except that the magazines did the smart thing and asked for payment first.
There is a criminal statute for that! https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2383. Appropriately titled "rebellion or insurrection." Trump was not charged under that statute.
RAND's role in the Vietnam War is widely derided on many grounds, from the highly unethical behavior exposed in the Pentagon Papers to technical incompetence in programs like Igloo White, the 'electronic fence' that was supposed to keep the NVA from infiltrating weapons, soldiers and supplies into South Vietnam. So maybe they were destroyed by largesse of the Vietnam War government contracting programs?

Eisenhower's famous comments about the military industrial complex are well known, but the later bits of that speech are worth reading (and contrasting to a certain recent spectacle of ignominious incompetence):

> "Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers. The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present — and is gravely to be regarded. Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite."

> "It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system — ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society."
The board already has all the limit detection. It just doesn't provide it at output pins.

Of course, the trend in consumer product interface is either nothing or a full web server with a "cloud" connection and an app. With ads.
> I’m not an expert of any kind here

You don't have to be an expert to have seen that it wasn't remotely sensible to react the way that people did - and that authoritarians, the whole world over, reacted stupendously irrationally and censored their opponents who said that perhaps we should keep things running as normally as possible and shelter the vulnerable. That was the consensus disaster response plan until George Bush took guidance from some girl's school science fair project.
> This is a misleading partial quotation. In the context of what they were saying, the president has the presumption of immunity, but it is not guaranteed. They specifically remanded the issue of Trump trying to get Pence to break the law to the lower courts to decide whether there was immunity. They did not say there was blanket immunity.

Sure, but take a look at what I posted, and then the proceeding sentences:

> Presiding over the January 6 certification proceeding at which Members of Congress count
the electoral votes is a constitutional and statutory duty of the Vice
President. Art. II, §1, cl. 3; Amdt. 12; 3 U. S. C. §15. The indictment’s
allegations that Trump attempted to pressure the Vice President to
take particular acts in connection with his role at the certification pro-
ceeding thus involve official conduct, and Trump is at least presump-
tively immune from prosecution for such conduct.

I don't see any reading from that where Trump doesn't have blanket immunity. They stopped just barely short of saying so, with a clear implication of what they believe.

Certifying the vote is an official responsibility of the VP, and Trump was talking about that responsibility. They are not allowed to consider motives, only whether Trump talking to Pence about certification is within his official powers.

I would be very, very surprised if a lower court was able to find that the conduct was not in an official function. There's not a lot of room here once you take out whether the motives align with a presidential function.
A Space That Occupies You: On Being in and Inspired by the Shower (2013)
The law actually says "anything of value of $5,000 or more". The majority opinion is just arguing in bad faith there
Prosecutions*. And you say that as if their goal is to prevent Trump from becoming president again, instead of just... doing their job and prosecuting (alleged) criminals.
If we're being pedantic...

320 milli bits per second? 0.32bps. That's not that much.
SEEKING WORK | Germany, remote or in-house (willing to travel)

I'm an old generalist programmer. I prefer to work on your custom codebases and I enjoy optimization work.

Backend: server-side web programming with PHP, Node, C++

Games: Pixi.js, Three.js, HTML/Canvas, Godot, custom code/engines using OpenGL or Vulcan

General programming: Python, C++, JavaScript, Pascal, Go, Lua, Swift

Platforms: MacOS, Proxmox, Arduino/Microcontrollers/SoCs

I like working on:

- proofs of concept and MVPs
- getting projects ready for demo day
- turning MVPs into fully fleshed-out products
- code reviews
- hot spot optimization and scalability
- developing/maintaining in-house tooling
- project rescues in the face of looming deadlines

Contact: udo@openfu.com
I've also had this experience.
To somewhere with a nationalized health system? Why can't we just have that here
It seems there are cases that are troubling:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berman_v._Parker

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London
SEEKING WORK | London | Remote (US/EU timezones)
I run a boutique software development studio, where I focus on helping startups get their MVP off the ground, or assisting companies with more intricate and involved development tasks. I'm particularly geared towards projects which involve more complex interactivity or problem-solving.

Clients come to me when they want more than a copy/paste solution, as I take the time to understand their business and goals in detail, collaborating with them to deliver something highly tailored to their precise needs.

More info / portfolio / contact: https://devbeat.co.uk

Thanks!
massgrave[dot]dev

The activation scripts are open source and available on github.

I personally take the HWID route, which you only need to do it once and the license persists between disk wipes and clean reinstalls.
Afaik we’re not really hiring there atm.
A lot of laws cover more conduct than people think they do, but I think that part of the point here is that it works on giver and receiver.
Sounds familiar. Trump thinks taking classified documents without telling anyone means he has officially declassified them.
I love NodeRED, been running it in my homelab for a few years
Any sort of reflection brings C++ one step closer to Python.

Implementing serialization for complex types often requires manual code writing or external tools. With static reflection you could automate this process

template<typename T>
void serialize(const T& obj, std::ostream& os) {
for_each(reflect(T), [&](auto member) {
os << member.name() << ": " << member.get(obj) << "\n";
});
}

Simplified property systems

class Person {
public:
Person(const std::string& name, int age)
: name(name), age(age) {}

std::string getName() const { return name; }
void setName(const std::string& name) { this->name = name; }

int getAge() const { return age; }
void setAge(int age) { this->age = age; }

private:
std::string name;
int age;

REFLECT_PROPERTIES(
(name, "Name of the person"),
(age, "Age of the person")
)
};

int main() {
Person person("Alice", 30);

auto properties = reflect::getProperties<Person>();

for (const auto& prop : properties) {
std::cout << "Property: " << prop.name
<< " (" << prop.description << ")" << std::endl;

auto value = reflect::get(person, prop.name);
std::cout << "Value: " << value << std::endl;

if (prop.name == "age") {
reflect::set(person, prop.name, 31);
}
}

std::cout << "Updated age: " << person.getAge() << std::endl;

return 0;
}

Simplified template metaprogramming

template<typename T>
void printTypeInfo() {
constexpr auto info = reflect(T);
std::cout << "Type name: " << info.name() << "\n";
std::cout << "Member count: " << info.members().size() << "\n";
}

Easier to write generic algorithms that work with arbitrary types

template<typename T>
void printAllMembers(const T& obj) {
for_each(reflect(T), [&](auto member) {
std::cout << member.name() << ": " << member.get(obj) << "\n";
});
}
You added your own automated control to your shared apartment buildings main gate? And your landlord agreed to this? I mean, I hope you got their permission…
I still happily run a 486 laptop (T6600C) and it's even networked. No evil hackers spotted so far. For some reason can't find an fTPM module for it.
So the car pictures you cut out were not free. Not a good comparison.

Unless you are saying you would be willing to pay up front for every website you want to visit. Is that right?
That's elapsed time, not CPU time.
>He made enough money for many lifetimes.

Did he already sell?

Then the Chewy thing ... is that supossed to be bad? Is he doing anything illegal?
The entire German government figured it out.
You know, that makes sense to me as well.

It seems courts just haven't done that, for some reason.

Anyway, the way the Supreme Court works is that cases make their way all the way up there not just to settle a fishing village quibble, but to decide if the underlying law is good or bad.

And so it becomes the occasion for conservative justices to do away with what they've thought was wrong for decades.
That would depend on the angle of attack and impact speed, wouldn't it?
>do you also color code your collection?

Haven't gotten that far yet.

This is just the first fifty kilos to emerge from rat's nests this decade.
> Because ML engineers also want version control and easy history and rollbacks and pull requests with code reviews for model changes.

That's not an answer so much as an excuse.

> There is no tool that does that except for the version control systems that programmers use.

It wouldn't be much effort at all, especially for Google, to write a simple wrapper that relied on a database or zfs snapshots or anything actually more suitable.
Generally a good first approach is to recuse oneself when conflicts of interest appear, a significant portion of this court has failed this test.
>
What about overthrowing the government? Because that's the "offical" act of the president with today's ruling.

The ruling basically says the only way for the case to move forward is to determine what parts of Trump's conduct can be deemed "unofficial".
Yeah, the article overlooked library support for SIMD. nalgebra had a decent writeup on their ability to squeeze out autovectorization for their vector and matrix types.
SEEKING WORK | ARGENTINA (GMT-3) | REMOTE

Résumé/CV: https://olano.dev/resume/

GitHub: https://github.com/facundoolano

Email: facundo.olano@gmail.com

Technologies: Erlang, Elixir/Phoenix, Python (Flask, FastAPI, Django, Celery), Golang, Rust, Clojure, Postgres, Redis, AWS, DataDog, Terraform.

Hi, I'm Facundo. I'm a Software Engineer with over 15 years of experience, most recently developing and operating large-scale backend systems.
I've done technical leadership, project management, and legacy modernizations.
I'm good at understanding business and customer needs, and writing reliable software.
> Testing the legality of “president issues order to kill terrorist” wouldn’t test much.

It does though.

It's not widely accepted that the US president can skip due process and murder US citizens.