skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Why, it's an improvement: I, for one, would like to know which air purifiers are the best ones...
I may or may not have grabbed the "LaunchOpenly" github organization name a while back. But I was intending to use it if anyone wanted to write an API-compatible Open Source clone of LD's APIs and flag-editing UI.
In shelters the city state or federal government sets up. To me we are essentially hosting a concert with no bathrooms. The answer isn't to let people pee and poop without bathrooms at the concert, the answer is to police that behavior while also providing bathrooms.
Apparently bullshit, though: https://www.lexpress.fr/idees-et-debats/michel-foucault-et-l...

Guy Sorman wasn't Foucault's friend, and later said (about his statement) that he never actually saw anything he described, but just a 'convergence of disturbing clues'. You have to bear in mind that accusing gay people of pedophilia is pretty standard fare for homophobes up and to this day.
I quite frankly question if that is true. A family member is allergic to eggs, as in "he will die if eggs have been near food he consumes". Local bakers have absolutely no issue producing cakes and bread for events when he asks and the prices difference is negligible.
Interestingly one of the very few other political parties that understand women to be female and men to be male - the Party Of Women - is also a limited company, just like Reform is: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/c...

Maybe this is the new standard for parties of protest against the neoliberal consensus?
> I was going to release Llama4, but because PunchTornado said pedantic things, y'know what? I'm not gonna.

Its not because he said things.

Instead it is that (if implemented) the things that he is advocating for would actually significantly reduce the amount of open-whatever-you-want-to-call-it models available as most of it would all get shut down.

If these people don't want these models to exist and they are just using this concern trolling to get rid of all these AI models, then I wish they would just say so openly.

Because that would be the result of their positions. It would be a destruction of most of the more-open AI models that we have available today and an end to the open-whatever AI industry.

If thats what you want, just say it, and then we can talk about the pros and cons of a completely centralized AI ecosystem that is only controlled by OpenAI, Google, and the government and how if the destruction of the AI startup space that is reliant on the models given out by meta/ect is good or bad.
And yet I'm sure they managed to think up something to say to people higher in status than themselves.
Diversity Was Supposed to Make Us Rich
And that's why these two services exist. They want spam control and you want anonymity. About the clearest example of separate markets.
You could even argue that you’re better off speaking standard German in Basel than Swiss German with a Zurich accent ;)
Where's your following of the other significantly more inconvenient parts?

Mixed fibers, prohibitions against eating pork, tattoos, fully submissive women, uncovered heads, slavery, divorce, etc

Some people actually do attempt to follow some of these things, but there's even contradictory information in the same book!
In most cities, free shelter sucks. It's only available on a day by day basis (sometimes requiring waiting in line in a specific place as late as 7 or 8 pm to know if there will be any beds open), or it has weird hours that get in the way of working schedules, or it requires people to participate in religious activities, or it puts everyone in one big room with no safety measures, or it has no way to store even minimal possessions securely, or it has nowhere to plug in a phone charger, or it has all the spaces to plug in phone chargers in one heap where it's easy for someone to steal a phone as everyone's being made to rush out the door at 7 AM, or it doesn't allow even well-behaved animals, or...

And on top of that, there's almost always a drastic shortage in shelter beds, so even people who jump through all the hoops only have a small chance of getting a spot. For example, Portland here, which is considered pretty homeless-friendly by a lot of people, only has enough shelter beds for about 1/5th of the homeless population.

For a lot of people, even perfectly functional, non-mentally-ill people, this makes it a perfectly logical move to look at shelters as only a measure of last resort and otherwise sleep in a car or find somewhere out of the way that will let them put their energy into trying to improve their situation rather than into trying to satisfy a new shelter's rules every day.
SEC sues Consensys over MetaMask swaps and staking services
See also

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_home_computers_by_vi...

Note Don Lancaster's technique used for video in some computers

https://www.tinaja.com/ebooks/cvcb1.pdf

such as

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZX80

In some strange sense this is like using a microcontroller to implement a CRTC except you're using the main CPU to do the work.
craigslist is dead, the news should be how marketplace quietly disrupted craigslist and the power of Meta integrating any product. if you're a B2C company and Meta decides to compete with you, you have no chance.
Yup. That website's no good. Looks like it either does a new tab popup or redirects the page. I can still read it if I use a harsh filter.
As this LLM operates on LLVM intermediate representation language, the result can be fed into https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/ and formally verified. For those who don't know what to print there: here is an example of C++ spaceship operator: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/YJPr84 (try to replace -1 with -2 there to break). This is kind of a Swiss knife for LLVM developers, they often start optimizations with this tool.

What they missed is to mention verification (they probably don't know about alive2) and comparison with other compilers. It is very likely that LLM Compiler "learned" from GCC and with huge computational effort simply generates what GCC can do out of the box.
It really doesn't, but I understand this is a very popular albeit destructive way of thinking.

There is much more to you as a member of society than your single vote. You get to vote for many people in many different elections. You also can get civically engaged in many different ways.
Was just reflecting on this yesterday: when I parked my car I saw a paper sign on the lamppost: “learn tennis from a professional”. The person was the number 1 player in Nepal, ranked in the 1200s professionally.

I assume and hope he was in Palo Alto as a student and just wanted to make some beer money. Otherwise that sign would reflect a pretty tough situation.

The Stanford faculty family swim and tennis club has a pro, the local Palo Alto tennis and skating club has a pro…there are a lot of them to go around.
The US has a long history of punishing people for being poor. Certainly nothing unusual about that.
Because it turns out that while this might sound like the easy, simple, convenient, right thing to do, if you try it (as we did), what happens is that people will forget or not understand they set it, and be unhappy and complain: https://gwern.net/design-graveyard#auto-dark-mode

(You can do the fallback to the CSS prefers setting, to try to not break dark-mode users, but if at all possible, you do want some sort of widget or toggle - at least for now. I am hopeful that in maybe 5 years it can be removed and users assumed to understand it.)
One of Gorsuch or Barrett must be illegitimate if you want to be consistent.

Scalia should have been replaced by Obama, or Ginsburg shouldn't have been replaced by Trump. All of the arguments that the Republicans made about Scalia's replacement were equally applicable to Ginsburg's.
The whole point of this judgment is that cities can now illegalize homelessness without needing to build any shelters.
Agreed they're using the term 'far right' without basis - the BNP, Britain First, and other groups that use violence are far right. These are parties that are concerned about immigration. But the 'hack' and bad language won't get you far on HN. Just flag the post and move on.
The Haredi know Hebrew. They spend all day every day reading and debating texts written in Hebrew…
The first few years at a previous startup I worked on. Java. CI/CD in place when merging PRs. But mostly, the thing that made the code base great was the fact that the code wrapped external libraries in small interfaces that were _owned by the company_, and dependency was used to not depend on implementation interfaces. In short, adhering to the basics on the SOLID principles.
It's not about intuition, it's about probability of impact. All these articles talking about asteroids flying within a lunar orbit distance make it sound like we got away lucky. But that's still far, far away, and the chances of impact are quite remote, in absolute terms.
> All this says is that if Congress defers something to a branch, and there is ambiguity, and it comes in front of a judge, the judge does NOT have to accept the branch's interpretation of the ambiguity, and can instead judge it as judges do.

So the Judicial branch has now taken on the task of determining policy, contra what was said in Chevron:

> When a challenge to an agency construction of a statutory provision, fairly conceptualized, really centers on the wisdom of the agency's policy, rather than whether it is a reasonable choice within a gap left open by Congress, the challenge must fail. In such a case, federal judges—who have no constituency—have a duty to respect legitimate policy choices made by those who do. The responsibilities for assessing the wisdom of such policy choices and resolving the struggle between competing views of the public interest are not judicial ones: "Our Constitution vests such responsibilities in the political branches."

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v._Natura...

So if Congress makes something explicit it is a policy by The People (through their elected representatives), and if there's some ambiguity it might be done purposefully by The People's representatives (Congress), with the explicit and implicit idea to have an agency deal with it. The agency is run by The People's Executive choice (President) or administrators (Secretary, Director, etc) agreeable to The People's representatives (via confirmation hearings).
> That is a straw man. That is a straw man. I expect them to write clear laws that state what agencies can do, what they cannot do, and how they should do it.

But laws can't do that in infinite detail. It's literally impossible. So it's not a straw man at all -- that was my point.

At some point, regulatory agencies, like anything in the executive branch, have to decide for themselves how to get their job done. Because they have to do that a million times every day.

If Congress didn't specify who will pay for the observers, it makes much more sense to leave it up to the agency than to the courts, except in cases of obvious abuse, corruption, etc. -- which this does not appear to be.

I agree it sucks that the fishing vessels have to pay for the observers, but it seems obvious to me that the body to fix that is Congress. If the fishing industry can't get the agency to change it, then they should be contacting their Congressional representatives to change it. And Congress either will or won't, but that's literally who is in charge of this.

It seems like a strange issue for the courts to get involved with, because there's no conflict with other laws or with the constitution.
but if congress explicitly states that agency xyz will update specific numbers wouldn't that be pretty solid? As far as I can tell, this is just about leaving it up to the courts when things are ambiguous, which is kind of the point of courts.
It doesn't seem to matter, there's another post alleging Bridgen said vaccine = holocaust 2.0. They've been radicalized to attack when they hear trigger words.
The comment you're responding to is clearly satire. Everything you said could be applied to the creative jobs some people think AI can replace.
If the scratches are on the inside it might not look too bad after you fill it with water, but still a bummer.
Facebook marketplace is a better experience.

CL had a miserable mobile experience up until a few years ago, no good mobile app, and spam has always been a problem on the platform.
> big publishing conglomerates like Dotdash Meredith have adopted a private equity model that “utilizes public trust in long-standing publications to sell every product under the sun” via Google SEO optimization

Am I the only one who likes this? I was looking for a new smartwatch and had no idea what was out there. I took the top 100 results, which from inspection were clearly all SEO optimized as mentioned, and ran them through ChatGPT to pull out the unique features and most important considerations when choosing a smartwatch. I took the search results again and ran them again through ChatGPT but this time asked it to pull out the different smartwatches and rank them on all the features previously identified. Voila, a detailed comparison table of smartwatches. I went back and checked and no individual site (even what this article says are "actual" review sites like the WireCutter) went into as much depth on features or different models as my table. Like no, I would not read each article by itself, but if life gives you lemons, it's a great time to make lemonade.
Fascinating, what kind of hardware/OS was used in production?
Having lived in Munich my entire life, I feel comfortable characterizing it as somewhere inbetween Zurich and Vienna. Transit is amazing in all three cities, the Alps are nearby in all three cities, although Vienna is rather "liberal" while Zurich is rather "conservative". Likewise, cost-of-living is Vienna < Munich < Zurich.

If you like weekend / multi-day hikes, I really strongly recommend checking out the Alpenvereinshütten. No such thing as camping on longer hikes when there's a (very affordable) mountain cabin with warm food on your way.
So agencies will not have any power to actually regulate.
I'm mostly with you but "other incredibly stupid ideas, like e-scooters" just sounds like a personal vendetta to me. I don't see anything SV specific about e-scooters, not is it a dangerous bubble or stupid to use compact electric powered modes of transport in a dense area.
Do you know any single person who can stop the process, at will? Maybe not always, but at least sometimes, on demand (either internally or externally invoked)?
There is no mens rea needed.

As it is said, "The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread."
Visual explanation: Fixing noisy neighbor problems in multitenant queuing system
We do actually have a way to validate election integrity because we have voter registration. If someone impersonates me and casts a vote in my name that is detected when I try to cast it again.

There’s zero credible evidence that it is needed and clear evidence that it will be used to disenfranchise voters.

It’s a feel-good “common-sense” issue but that juice ain’t worth the squeeze.
Not really, those weights are the same ones that are there during training getting modified by backprop. You can take them and continue training the model in order to produce different behaviour. You can also modify them directly like with LoRA or steering. You can also make bigger modifications like expanding the layers or removing nodes. It’s not a frozen binary, those numbers aren’t obfuscated or optimized into some special purpose form that prevents or makes modification difficult.
AFAIK this is a heuristic, not a category. The underlying grammar would be preserved.

Personally I thought we were way too close to perfect to make meaningful progress on compilation, but that’s probably just naïveté
The author is a social conservative. He's by no means defending Foucault's "assault against sexual normalization".

My sense is that, by "recognizing Foucault's bleak genius," the subtext is "we need God because otherwise there's nothing but depravity".
Yes, but will the enterprise world flinch an eye? Whoever chooses microsoft for their enterprise stuff do not care about security, as long as it’s not their direct fault directly in cases of customer data breaches they feel safe: “oh, Microsoft got hacked not us”. It’s like nobody gets fired for buying IBM all over again.
As a speaker of Viennese German and English, I have no problem understanding spoken Yiddish.
If one takes the width of the plow or seeder one is tractoring and divide the length of the field by that width one will get the number of times the tractor goes back and forth across the field to completely seed or plow it.

If the tractor travels at constant velocity V_tractor m/s and multiplies by the width of the plow or seeder and the time in seconds the tractor took to plow or seed the field one gets the total area of the field expressed in meters^2. This can be extended to a tractor traveling at V(t) if infinitesimal units dt of area are summed.

This is known as the Fundamental Theorem of Tractor Calculus and is the basis of Tractor Field Theory;)
Jesus never revoked Leviticus. So that'll be a hard sell for most.
Their website has a recall notice on it now: https://diamondshruumz.com/
Oceania was always at war with Eastasia...

Just blaming public enemy of the day. Knowing who actually did it I difficult and not really important either.
What would prevent people from just posting the same videos and tweets once they land?
If Congress doesn't want to do anything, and this one clearly doesn't (they look to be on pace for the fewest acts ever), then that just effectively kicks the responsibility down to State legislatures. Good for distributing power. You know, laboratories of democracy.
Yiddish wasn’t a created language.
In a shelter. Most recent reports suggest that a lot of the new shelters cities have been building are not being used to their intended capacity. Probably because there isn't a way to implore people to go into shelter beyond offering it and trying to move them along from where they are presently camped using existing rulings (such as no camping near a school and other such laws certain cities have passed recently). If peoples choices are instead shelter in the provided shelter or spend a night in jail (which cities don't even have the space in their jails to jail every homeless person today fwiw), they might start filling these shelters, which might show the public that it is worth while to invest more money into building more of them considering they are getting used.Right now, its too easy to convince the public that homeless spending has been a waste of time and money on part of the poor utilization of present affordances. Sentiment on my local city subreddit about an upcoming homeless service tax program is pretty much in the gutter right now.
The correct axis is free vs. anti-free. If you map your ideology on economic freedom vs. government control of the economy, and personal freedom vs. government control of your body, then you get a quadrant rather than a left-right divide.

If you support personal liberty and economic freedom, you are a libertarian. But you would be labeled "far right" by many.
Erm... I think there will be problems as a result of this, but your comment is wildly bad on a number of levels.

#1 - Chevron deference as a rule comes out of Chevron, and the idea that Chevron just encoded something that was already always done is ahistorical. Both before Chevron and going forward, courts will still often defer to agency interpretation when that makes sense. They just won't be compelled to look at it so uncritically.

#2 - The idea that Chevron has been uncontroversial until now is totally detached from reality, and is a dead giveaway that you really don't know much about this.
PyCon US 2024 videos are up (tutorials and sponsor presentations)
Gluten free foods are 50% more expensive, and far more restricted in availability.
Is Self-Conscious AI Possible?
""Put in a different way: The reason why computers cannot be self-conscious is not that they are “not yet complex enough” and that making them more sophisticated would do the job. The problem is rather that they are not simple enough. And they will never be simple enough for the simple reason that they are material.""
The Rule of Thirds is like the rule of not starting your sentences with conjunctions (and, or, etc.) or DRY.

They're rules for newbies, but eventually experience should replace rules.

That doesn't mean the rules aren't wrong -- often following them makes sense stylistically.

I think a huge signal of inexperience is people who put rules on a pedestal (when doing work).
The First IEEE International Workshop on LLM-Aided Design (LAD'24)
I thought to add: I checked to see if this brand still exists and it seems they do and it’s now a rechargeable device yielding a good IP rating. No word on how many readings it performs a minute other than “real time”.
I do not optimise my life to benefit my day job.

And even if I did, socialising with your coworkers has a strong chance of being much better for your career than another early night.
While that is a very important thing to consider when evaluating any law or judicial ruling in general, I don't think it shifts my view much in this case.

Foremost, this decision makes it easier to overturn regulations while making it harder to create them. This strictly moves the balance of power to the right regardless of who controls the presidency or congress at any moment.

Secondly, it moves power out of the executive and to the judicial, which currently leans right, and will likely continue to for decades.

Lastly, there were always limits as too how far of an interpretation they could push because it still has to be reasonable, and still has to follow many other rule-making processes we have. The left got lucky in that the Trump administration was particularly incompetent at following either of those, which we can't always depend on, but even without that it provided some bumpers.
Why do the scientists velieve that using a "quick test" that checks only part of DNA is good?
Wouldnt it be better to do full sequencing, instead of this ITS test? Especially if that part is mutating quickly.

If they want to move forward shouldnt thry do boring full sequencing? Then they can make real comparisons, not estimates?
The horror. They can just go and...not pay attention? Just like most people who attend religious services.
Well, most cities with a homeless crisis today don't exactly have the spare jail capacity to actually enforce anything like that, so I think giving some tools where you can be pragmatic about where an issue is presently taking place while you can attempt to solve it on the back end is useful. My city has already passed laws about homeless camps near dangerous intersections for pedestrians who have to step into the street to avoid the camp, laws about not camping near schools or childcare centers, and its done quite a bit to help the average pedestrian in the neighborhood as a result.
> I suspect an LLM could possibly handle generating the text in a quarterly report...

Except that a quarterly report needs to be free of hallucinations. The SEC doesn't like it when a company makes false statements to its shareholders.
> b) this is sloppy/inappropriate/dangerous language for this topic

Yes, I'm describing Untrue Scotsmen. I'm hoping for a citation or something I can google.

People are farting in my rational cleanroom and I don't like it.
Uber Lyft pay Massachusetts drivers min $32.50/hour give state $175M settlement
I hope you enjoy drinking your poison water and breathing your poison air as much as the companies that skirt environmental regulations enjoy their cost savings.
Depends on what rights the corporations enjoy and the states where the corporation is sued.
The tabi release notes have items irrelevant to users, details irrelevant to users in each item, and poor organization in each section.