skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> People dying in the streets isn't something that should be up for debate or popular vote

This is useless hyperbole.
>it would also be a demonstration of development and access to resources beyond our imagination. That's the upside [...] In a galaxy of sparse and sparingly advanced civilizations, the message might be "fear us and stay away" in a way that EM would not convey.

I think you've hit the crux the question. If there are only a few civilizations, I agree, that'd be an awe-inspiring deterrent.

However, if you don't know how many civilizations there are that are similarly advanced to your own, sending out a big "we're here!" message may be quite risky.

In terms of game theory, it's a sequential and incomplete information game. I think the smartest decision is to remain quiet.
You, then: As the dissent notes, third-party releases are part of the law.

Gets called out for over-simplifying the case.

You, now: What is the difference between a discharge and release as it relates to the §1123(b)(6) “any other appropriate provision” power this case is about?

Indeed. Maybe next time, stop pretending there isn't more to it.
Add the dataset!
It's all about running technique, not the shoes. If you switch to minimalist shoes, but continue with the same (wrong) technique then you'll have problems.

Big, padded shoes are for a specific (wrong) technique. "Barefoot" running technique doesn't need fancy shoes.
Thank you! That's definitely a great way to look at it. Complacency and habit breed accidents. Although not the the Boeing/mechanical issues. Still worried about the ghost in the machine or gremlins!
“Unfortunately that deference has gone too far”

I don’t think I can support an objective idea that it’s “gone too far” when the decision was on ideological boundary. This was political activism not jurisprudence.
I'm unfortunately not that familiar with the internals.

I think the public bazel (public version of blaze) docs is probably the best place to look.

https://bazel.build/basics/hermeticity
Did you list the wrong thing, because this seems pretty limited?

(a) Radioactive pollutants, cadmium, arsenic, and polycyclic organic matter
Not later than one year after August 7, 1977 (two years for radioactive pollutants) and after notice and opportunity for public hearing, the Administrator shall review all available relevant information and determine whether or not emissions of radioactive pollutants (including source material, special nuclear material, and byproduct material), cadmium, arsenic and polycyclic organic matter into the ambient air will cause, or contribute to, air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health. If the Administrator makes an affirmative determination with respect to any such substance, he shall simultaneously with such determination include such substance in the list published under section 7408(a)(1) or 7412(b)(1)(A) 1 of this title (in the case of a substance which, in the judgment of the Administrator, causes, or contributes to, air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to result in an increase in mortality or an increase in serious irreversible, or incapacitating reversible, illness), or shall include each category of stationary sources emitting such substance in significant amounts in the list published under section 7411(b)(1)(A) of this title, or take any combination of such actions.

(b) Revision authority
Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed to affect the authority of the Administrator to revise any list referred to in subsection (a) with respect to any substance (whether or not enumerated in subsection (a)).
> Agencies will just need to work with Congress to help them write laws

This is already exactly how it works.

One reason why legislating takes so long is because there is an enormous amount of collaboration between legislators and agencies to get it as right as they can.
I work in data engineering, I have seen more ways to fuck up data than any human has any business seeing, that's not new to me. Here's some more ideas for maximum fun with CSVs:

- Make sure to write your own parser! The format is so simple!

- Is the first line a header or not? The RFC says you should look at the MIME type to tell. You can't make this up.

- Is the line terminator "\r\n", "\n" or "\r"?

- What happens if the number of records for a line is incorrect? Well, that SHOULD'nt happen...

- Make sure to involve Excel, nothing ever went wrong feeding data to Excel.

- Are end-of-line spaces relevant or not? Should we trim them?

There is no defending of CSV, it's a broken format and it's broken beyond repair. The point is that the separator is immaterial. Replacing commas with something else gains us exactly nothing, and results in an identically broken format.
You mean that thing that a certain political party had taken great pains to stack with partisans judges will now get to decide even more?
I think your grandpa was messing with you. Flashing turn signals and the click sound came with a 1938 invention which Buick started putting into cars in 1939.

There were other turn signal approaches used before then, though not all cars had turn signals. Some of those approaches were mechanical, but still don't really align to your grandpa's claim.

https://www.qualityplusautomotive.com/blog/2020/september/th...

https://www.cartalk.com/blogs/jim-motavalli/strange-true-his...
It's not a huge mystery why this is an issue. Most land that axis roam on is private and either does not allow hunting or charges very inflated prices to hunt. The other factor is the Hawaii DLNR is terrible at herd management. I've been hunting axis during the archery season on Lanai for years but am contemplating not going back because of how unorganized the program is and because they absolutely failed in managing the 2020 drought that killed almost 2/3 of the herd. I'd love to hunt Molokai or Maui but unless you personally know a landowner who will allow you to hunt, be prepared to pay upwards of $5K just for one animal. That's crazy.
This is a net negative for US citizens
Comments like this make me glad the FAA requires certification for everything.
OK but you could say that about practically any job - given enough time and technical progress. But in this context we are talking about these few jobs where people really enjoy what they are doing and actually create something genuinely new. If all artist disappear and what we're left with is GenAI feeding on GenAI, it's a bit sad because art is an important part of our culture.[0]

[0] Well, Murati could say, "Maybe it shouldn't be in the first place"...
Foucault is the primary intellectual force behind the contemporary social science trend of seeing everything through a power relationships lens. His influence cannot be overstated, at least in the American academy. It's bizarre.
I think describing a 2 line statement as civil discourse worth of engagement really puts some pressure on those 2 lines. Following it up with disagree with words, not downvotes adds to the weight of those lines.

Given the effort ratio, I wouldnt condone downvotes, however I wouldnt be surprised if that was the easiest response.

Also - Downvotes have existed since, at least, slashdot. They are not censorship. They can be misapplied, but it’s not censorship.

This site is also actively moderated. It’s part of the censorship industrial complex as trust and safety is being called now.
That would be a good step, and I see how that allows for everyone to remain in the marketing cesspool of their choosing. But as for myself, I want "posts" and a customizable feed. Without the ads and attention-maximizing bs.
This would be difficult to deploy as-is in production.

There are correctness issues mentioned in the paper regarding adjusting phase orderings away from the well-trodden O0/O1/O2/O3/Os/Oz path. Their methodology works for a research project quite well, but I personally wouldn't trust it in production. While some obvious issues can be caught by a small test suite and unit tests, there are others that won't be, and that's really risky in production scenarios.

There are also some practical software engineering things like deployment in the compiler. There is actually tooling in upstream LLVM to do this (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQu1CLZ3uWs), but running models on a GPU would be difficult and I would expect CPU inference to massively blow up compile times.
One thing I haven't seen mentioned- a wall mounted monitor arm. I use an adjustable sit/stand desk and hated even the minor vibrations produced by my typing, attaching my monitor to a wall mounted arm eliminated this issue.
> the university professor who taught me GR thought that singularities are "real"

Did he teach it from Wald's classic textbook? Wald, Chapter 9, explicitly disclaims any belief that singularities are real and explicitly says the classical GR prediction of singularities indicates a breakdown in the theory in that regime. Other classic textbooks like Misner, Thorne, & Wheeler say similar things. So do many peer-reviewed papers published in the field.

Sadly, I am not surprised, though I am disappointed, that many university professors do not know the subject they are teaching well enough to be aware of what I have just said. But the fact remains that the statements I have described are the ones Kerr (who certainly cannot claim ignorance on the part of whoever taught him GR as an excuse) should have been looking at to gauge the prevailing opinion of actual researchers in the field. But he didn't.

> if we'll take a look at the pop-sci coverage

Nobody should be relying on pop science to learn actual science. Nor should anyone claim that pop science coverage is an accurate gauge of the opinions of actual researchers in the field.
That doesn't really follow, because it seems that people were and are wanting black holes to be something else that they are both not observed to be and not described by any theory of them.

Also, I think it gets lost in physics that theories are models of reality. They are not reality themselves. General relativity is about as good as a model gets. Alongside the standard model, it's one of the most tested models around.

A singularity has a meaning in physics in terms of math, which is dividing by zero or something approaching zero in the denominator. A singularity has a physically modeled aspect in that it's the name assigned to whatever becomes of the matter that gets squished down. A black hole is effectively not a thing in itself but rather an effect of what happens when mass is squeezed beyond all known limits.

What's inside a black hole is not the only thing in the universe we can't see. The actual universe is far bigger than the visible universe, but we can't see outside of the visible universe due to how light works. So it basically doesn't even matter what's going on there. The question is if anything happening at the boundaries can tell us something about that which we can't see. It doesn't make sense to dismiss what we observe on the outside based upon what we literally cannot know of the inside.

And after all, general relativity is a classical theory. Is it really all that "weird"? It all feels somewhat mechanical and natural as you start learning it and turn off your biased intuition.
I am on a Hisense A7cc. I think it's actually a much better experience than using traditional Chrome/Firefox, especially with scrolling as you say.
> now people are going to be concerned about the unpredictability of the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has been reversing itself since the country's inception. I think we'll survive it making corrections in the future.
That’s why the police should determine innocence and guilt, they’re the experts.
A former president's crocodiles are terrorising Ivory Coast's capital (2019)
Plenty of ads though.
Would it be crazy to call Judaism in 1920s Germany basically like a German subculture of people who are ethnically German and speak a variation of the language? I’ve met so many other Jews (that fled Germany originally) that to me are basically German (even have German last names).
> But overturning it wasn’t “political.” It was originally decided by five republicans and a Democrat (with three justices not participating) and was overturned by six republicans. What happened was an ideological shift in the Republican Party

Your conclusion doesn't match your argument. The original decision was voted in along party lines, the party ideology changed, and now it's been overturned again along party lines. How is that not political?
I worked with someone who insisted on using fx for DI in go. It's so antithetical to the entire Go philosophy, I don't even think it's an "advanced feature". It's just bringing Java cruft to a language where it isn't necessary and making everything worse.
"... physical attributes more common in this group that are conducive to an energy-efficient gait, including... a high ratio of leg length to torso." I wonder how much the added height of the shoes mimics (or exaggerates) having long legs?
I think that's a genuine dispute, because people consciously deciding to make a new language is a relatively rare phenomenon. Most language change is informal and unplanned.
Ok, but where exactly?

It's midnight, there are several thousand homeless people in the city, where do they sleep?
> To give it up, would be to give up the one thing that their entire life has revolved around since childhood.

I imagine they could try to transfer to some coaching carrier, open personal business, etc.
Microsof AI CEO: the content that is on the open web is that it's "freeware"
Past me is someone else. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_of_Theseus
Pimpin’ ain’t easy. You need lots of lobbyists and a continual presence on The Hill.
Count me as skeptical as well. Not only would it have been wildly impractical, but iron is prone to rusting and expands when it rusts. Plus it is slippery when wet. It's just not a good pothole filler.
Even with Lava, you're not going to melt iron, even when' it's just leaving the volcano it's not generally hot enough, and by the time it reaches the city it's even colder.

The melting point of iron is very high, and that's why for a long time iron was never molten even during the production process (slag was, but not the iron)
Cool but what’s its orbital period and how does this close pass effect future crossings?
Uninteresting fact: I did the code to download TomTom map updates. Mozilla XUL app.

The XML required a good 4GB of RAM to load the model. So… I just read the stream to get to the token I needed and read until the end token.

Obviously, it was faster and required much less memory. The take-away is if you don’t need to parse the model, don’t.

I assume that nowadays, they’re using more sensible format.
You’re solving a human problem with technology. Pilots are resistant to data collection because of the proven track record of airlines using it against them. Unintended consequences are fatal in aviation. Saying “it ought to be easy” is an immediately disqualifying statement. You should ask instead why it is so expensive. Then decide if there’s a margin worth eroding.
that all makes sense but i think if you're aiming for longevity then separating the active mechanical bits (mtbf low) from the electronic bits (mtbf high) is a good idea, just because physical effort in proximity to breakable things is likely to break them faster. this would be a case for not building in the pullstring and instead using an external pump. but you could have both, as well. supercaps are good for capturing fleeting charge but don't store for too long. they do store longer than regular caps, but they leak current over time. an air tank can be 'on board' with high longevity and low mtbf. the connections/seals the probable locus of problems.
With only a few minutes thought on the subject, it seems like Congress could explicitly amend the APA to state that the interpretation in Chevron is correct.

They might not do that, but from my initial non-expert read of today's opinion, the Court only looked to the APA, not the Constitution in generating its ruling.
Reasonably, maybe, but it means that the person needs to rejects themself. At this level of immersion sport/music becomes the part of the person, their definition (implicit or explicit) contains words "music" or "sport". It is still possible to throw it away and start again, but it is really difficult psychologically, and probably in other aspects too: they don't know how to be someone who is not a musician or an athlete.
> No man can reveal to you aught but that which already lies half asleep in the dawning of your knowledge.

That's called "zone of proximal development" in pedagogy.

However, "that which already lies half asleep in the dawning of your knowledge" is often a consequence of things that were revealed to you previously.

When you learn, you could probably make any specific step alone, but you cannot make all the steps alone.
Open source 'Eclipse Theia IDE' exits beta to challenge Visual Studio Code
Fundamentally, people are suffering because the courts are acting for political expedience instead of doing and saying what's right and correct.

Congress should get its Act together, but one group acting in responsible is not license for another group to act irresponsible.
They lived in really nice villas too. Frescos on the wall and mosaic floors. Better constructed than modern ones in some regards. No sqeeky floors for example. Surrounded by organic gardens with lemons and oranges and fragrant spices
I went to UIUC for CS ('14), in our Systems class we had one project where we had to write our own version of malloc() in C.

They made it into a competition and it was so much fun (graded on latency and efficient space usage). I remember the person who won was a PhD student who had to take the undergrad course as a prereq for some Grade level class.
As the legitimacy of institutions continues to fade, you'll see more and more transparent cash grabs. This applies across the board: media, government, etc.
Well, first impressions:

It is part of our human condition to long for hard lines and clear concepts. When we have them we have to either face the fact that some realities elude them, or else bind ourselves to the inadequacy of the concepts.

https://fs.blog/impressions-are-schematically-determined / https://archive.is/F8uPE
> These mythical carriers did not exist in 1941 and could not have.

Here is my alternate history scenario:

IF the US had Fairey Swordfish that had proven effective in combating Japanese submarines on the West Coast, Which they had but Admiral Nimitz did not believe the reports. The Fiarey Swordfish were superior ASW aircraft in 1934. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairey_Swordfish

And IF the US had hundreds or thousands more Fairey Swordfish they had built. This is the alternate history part. The US had the tools to set up an assembly line in storage and forgot to tell anyone after Prime Minister Churchill told President Roosevelt how important they were.

And IF the US had used those newly American-made Swordfish to drive the German U-boats away from the US East Coast, moving the Battle of the Atlantic farther out to sea,

And IF the US then wanted to convert any ship in production to be a light carrier designed to carry Fairey Swordfish and escort convoys,

Then some or all of the 8 light cruisers the US completed in 1942 (source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Navy_in_World_Wa...) could have been converted as the Independence Class aircraft carriers were converted from the Cleveland Class light cruisers (source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independence-class_aircraft_ca...)

I am not talking about magically building more Hornet or Essex class fleet carriers. I'm talking about changing history so that light cruisers were converted into escort carriers and Fairey Swordfish hunted U-boats in the Atlantic long before this really happened.

I contend 2 changes would have shortened World War 2 massively:
1. The US should have never mass-produced the Mark 14 torpedo and instead tested the heck out of the Mark 10.
2. The US should have mass-produced a variant of the Swordfish, instead of mass-producing the TBD as a torpedo plane.

I would love to move up the production of Kaiser's Escort Carriers, but that would be too risky. The magic of Kaiser's escort carriers could be sabotaged by a butterfly flapping its wings. I would only supply them with a bunch of Swordfish when they were available to go with their F4F Wildcats and SBD Dauntlesses.
Holy carp, Batman! What IS that web page that pegs 8 cores of CPU and reloads itself four times before I can hit the back button. Maybe just link to the original video and not a cruft-laden-seo-dump.

https://www.tiktok.com/@shortysspeedshop/video/7371594191027...

[ Edit: Oh... you can get the text without the cruft by using lynx. nice. ]
> After three years of meticulous and dedicated hard work, the Rhisotope Project at Wits University has successfully inserted low doses of radioisotopes into 20 live rhinoceros.

Sounds like there is some inherent difficulty requiring years of meticulous and dedicated hard work to insert doses into 20 live rhinoceroses.
Elena Kagan Is Horrified by What the Supreme Court Just Did. You Should Be Too
Do you think it is realistic to add tab auto-completion to the playground? This would make learning CQL more fun and less.. ahhh :).
Absolutely!
We should also make sure that no one in agencies is safe. It’s only the industries and courts which can do the work - only for a short while, you know, till congress gets less gridlocked.

Seeing how polarized and partisan things are, it will only be a few decades!

Plus seeing how some of the court positions have been, I can only think that lobbying is going to become a massive business ! So much growth!
ClojureScript + Re-frame + GraphQL subscriptions over WebSockets: https://github.com/Vetd-Inc/vetd-app
Needing to go to someone else to exercise power is literally not having power.
> it's also valid for Congress to decide to abdicate its powers

Yeah, that's a "no." Taking away power from voters and handing it to unelected bureaucrats is specifically what the Constitution is meant to protect against.

All legislative power in the government is vested in Congress, constitutionally. That power cannot be delegated to anyone, precisely because it would result in tyranny and disenfranchisement of voters (i.e. "us").

The only way to enable this is to amend the Constitution, which, if that's what voters want, they can do.
Supreme Court strikes down Chevron, curtailing power of federal agencies
Sounds like pro tennis has a lot in common with startup world and SV
The issue is that the "ethics and morals" of the powerful are in reality weapons pointed at working people. If using state power gained through elections to improve the lives of the people who elected you is immoral or unethical, your system of ethics is a farce.
> Congress can actually legislate the right of agencies to interpret the gaps in the laws back into effect - by passing a law that explicitly gives agencies this power.

Congress can't actually legislate anything while it's held hostage by obstructionists and there's effectively zero chance that a bunch of republicans who want to dismantle the already inadequate regulations that keep entire communities from being poisoned will vote to remove their power to do exactly that through the supreme court.
You can literally type "beg the court" into google and the first result is a .gov site.

"pleading" is also legal terminology.
Why is this comment being downvoted? Is it not true?
Nah, there are a lot of powerful organizations fighting pornography and sex work in the United States.
Show HN: Focal, a Pomodoro App
Focal is a pomodoro web app. I know there's a lot of productivity apps already, but I'm releasing this since I figure someone might find it useful. Focal was more of a short, 3 day project so it may be rough around the edges, but I think it does the job. In any case, Focal is open source and I would be happy to merge contributions.
Here's the github repository: https://github.com/aabiji/focal

Have a nice day!
DOSBox-X