skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>> Now Congress is going to have to specify every possible consequence of laws in the statutes, otherwise a judge will decide.

It has already been that way for a while. From the decision:

"Because Chevron’s justifying presumption is, as Members of the Court have often recognized, a fiction, the Court has spent the better part of four decades imposing one limitation on Chevron after another. Confronted with the byzantine set of preconditions and exceptions that has resulted, some courts have simply bypassed Chevron or failed to heed its various steps and nuances. The Court, for its part, has not deferred to an agency interpretation under Chevron since 2016."

...

"Given the Court’s constant tinkering with and eventual turn away from Chevron, it is hard to see how anyone could reasonably expect a court to rely on Chevron in any particular case or expect it to produce readily foreseeable outcomes."
I did retail theft at an Apple Store
We elect the executive to set the policy for and run the executive branch.

An EPA employee doesn’t “rule” any more than a congressional staffer or court clerk.
It is much worse than just creating a legislative branch under the executive. Executive agencies are judge, jury, and executioner when it comes to their rules. They have their own enforcement teams, courts, and make up their own penalties for violating the rules they made up. They are like a government inside the Constitutional government.

The government is required to give everybody a speedy trial with a jury of their peers. Fines are also required to not be excessive. Violate an executive agency rule and you will not get what is required by the Constitution.
Pretending like total control of foreign policy isn't the greatest power of all
Succeeding as an author, actor, or tennis player is a much greater challenge than starting a company. There are millions and millions of companies succeeding well enough to keep their owners afloat. The chances for creative careers and professional sports, meanwhile, are abysmal.
I have a suspicion that "flow" (or visual movement) has similar snobist connotations :)

I'm not saying that snobbery in art is bad, by the way. I just couldn't find the right words for these concepts being social constructs, instead of related to fundamental workings of the brain.

I find it interesting to consider aspects of vision that we all share, i.e. those that are not learned at a later age. Op-art is not really my cup of tea, but contrast, visual hierarchy, symmetry, all play interesting roles in painting and photography.

I wonder if flow is one of those rudimentary visual skills, because I never experienced it before someone told me about it.
The person that posted that link is the lead architect on Positron. So yeah it's certainly known about!
There's this pro-growth pro-tech mantra which seems to be "everything will always be ok" and it just seems there has to be limits to it.
"If you accept the majority opinion at face value, then the majority opinion sure does make a lot of sense!"
That type of tooling can be replicated. That's why every Xoogler tries so hard to get Bazel adopted on everything they touch. Sometimes that's appropriate, sometimes it's not, but that's why.

Bazel isn't the whole of everything though, the other piece being exported is kubernetes, which isn't Google's borg, but that's its roots. There's Apache Airflow if you need a workflow engine like Sisyphus, no shortage of databases to choose from, though now we're drifting into the operations side of things.

But basically, Google has invested untold millions of dollars in the form of SWE and other engineering hours into making Google3 operate. If anyone else invested that kind of dough, with enough smarts, they'd also be able to make it a good experience. The problem is few people have that kind of budget, and even fewer invest in that thing, preferring to use free tools instead.

What tool do you use to edit code, and how much did your employer spend on that for you?
What is "the chocolate factory"? Why is it mentioned only once, but randomly in other articles? Is this a moniker for google?
FullBashGuide
Glorious 7-bit graphics.
Living outside also exposes you to crime, drugs, and danger too. Sometimes homeless people end up "captured" by gangs using threat of violence or cutting off a vice, and are forced to do things like sell drugs, sell scrap, or sell themselves to keep up with the taxation imposed by these gangs. Is everyone captured on the street like this? Of course not, but a few are, and there's really no recourse or protection. Are things maybe not so pretty in all shelters? Of course, but I'd take a facility where at least there is some recourse for bad action where it happens over the street where there is no recourse at all and you might end up as a modern slave to a gang member.
Just used 3 tier nested sub selects and joins to diagnose a major incident, the breadth of what it can process is awesome.

Without SQL there would have been no way to determine the extent of the issue.

People forget that SQL is the only 4th gen language in common prod use.

Python, Java, C# are only 3rd gen.
Cryptocurrency industry, will now innovate far more
You can get two or three vaccinations at once provided they don't have any issues with each other. I just got Shingrix and TDAP earlier this week, one in each arm. Pro tip, get the one more likely to cause injection site pain (Shingrix in my case) in your non-dominant arm.
Bible !== christianity, or any of those things you listed. It's the best-preserved-most-ancient library of texts that have been continually read daily by at least someone ever since they were produced, and have had a huge impact on western thought and civilization, conceptions of morality, justice, duty, separation between authority and religion within society, etc. And it does all of that while being shared between many religions.
My issue is that it was already known that you can't vaccinate against a corona virus. Why we were convinced this time would be different was insane to me. They used to call them "mutations". But they came up with a new word "variants". Plus there were past attempts to come up with vaccines for SARS and MERS which all failed. This was no different. I wished they had leveled with everyone about this rather than scare the shit out of people.
But you never know... You might be the first one :-)
In this case, `RUST_BACKTRACE` is described in Chapter 9 of The Book:

https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch09-01-unrecoverable-errors-...

I would say that this has good discoverability. If you're learning the language and writing your algorithmic trading platform in it, The Book should probably be the first document that you go to.
Tell that to Merrick Garland and Mitch McConnell.
The courts are HIGHLY ideologically divided.

Take a look at the recent Murthy verdict and Justice Alito’s dissenting opinion.

The point is to avoid “experts”.
Perhaps they've decided to draw inspiration from https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647959.
It seems like the biggest outcome is that as we all know Congress can't pass laws, so the judicial system just go a huge amount of power to interpret ambiguous laws (I'm not sure how controversial this but language is inherently ambiguous...).

I expect a lot of court shopping to judges in Texas to get favorable result to abscond with any regulatory oversight
I'm surprised there's no TNT equivalent comparing it to the biggest weapons humans have created. That always seems like a data point used when showing destructive forces.
>The point is that all of the examples given are a rejection

Yes, but what is the translation of that rejection in English as a response to the question being asked? Is it "No, I won't even bother taking a look at it" or "No, I think your business plan is trash but I'm going to pretend I haven't read it yet and hope you get the message."
Case load is simply the number of active cases and therefore not limited to the number of cases but also includes how long each case takes to complete.

As this requires judges to consider a wider range of options it inherently means these cases will take longer thus increasing caseload. Further, it also means bringing these cases before the court will get more expensive as individual cases take longer.
Judges are appointed, not elected. Federal Judges receive lifetime appointments.

This decision takes power away from elected officials and hands the power to appointed officials, officials appointed for life.

Conservatives have played the long after to Roe to attempt to stack the courts with conservative judges. This is how we got to the Supreme Court that we have now.
Congress is a mess because the country is a mess--the elected represent the electorate.
Except good luck having a phone without Play Store and Google Play services.
They're not more "random" than developers of a lot of software you run. Package quality tends to be pretty good, I've only seen doubtful things once or twice in about a decade, and nothing malicious. Definitely haven't seen anything like the famous `rm -rf /*` in the official non-"random" nvidia package that was prepared and then shat into the world by nvidia's non-"random" developers.
It's definitely great when done well. How about the tougher ones like incident retrospectives(or postmortems)? Is it also a team effort?
I'm doing a small project. I'm experimenting with a pure JS/HTML/CSS approach.

1. Doing "myElement.innerHTML = `...`" is sufficient for the low-hanging fruit that most jsx gets used for.

2. I also have a `Fluent()` function that returns an object with attrSet/attrRemove/classAdd/etc functions, which each also return the same object. It lets me do something like:

var el = Fluent('div')
.attrSet('disabled')
.classAdd('waves btn btn-small')
.idSet('MyNewElement')
.push(Fluent('div')
.attrSet('...'))
.attachTo(document.querySelector('#SomeParent');

So far, I'm not liking the second one much, and the first one is really hard to compose, but they're both useful for when you don't want a build-step.
In Norway, they use a high ~~8% feed from natural gas. Extracting from the atmosphere will ~~100 times as costly and I think these atmospheric capture ones are scams. The exception is the making of liquid oxygen from the air for steel production, where entrained CO2 and Neon and Argon are entrained by products at arbitrary cost
You think begging for something is legal terminology?
"Nobody is going there anymore. It is too crowded."

I feel 'everyone' and 'nobody' very often can be replaced by 'a lot' and 'few'.
If the spirit of the ruling originally by the SCOTUS was to benefit corporations , and they overturned it because it was no longer benefiting corporations - are they really corrupted? Or just business as usual?
>"We are in a new era of judicial supremacy"

Are you from Latin America?Martinelli (Panama) has been complaining of "Civil Dictatorship" since being on trial and hidden inside the Nicaraguan Embassy. Chavez (Costa Rica) is denouncing a Democratic "Dictatorship then Tyranny" because he finds independece of powers (Executive, Legislative and Judicial) cumbersome.

Dangerous direction, people complaining about power balance checks
I don't see how that would be the case long term, $32/hour is higher than minimum wage ($15/hr) but the settlement only seems to apply to time with a passenger.

If passenger load is less than 50% then it drops down to or lower than minimum wage.
What? Some guy making a vague statement on a web forum with nothing concrete to back it is "direct, irrefutable evidence"? I'd like to see any evidence at all that any SCOTUS judge is actually profiting from this decision in any way. Chevron was corrupt 40 years ago; overturning it is not, or at least isn't more corrupt than the decision originally was in the first place.
Legislative powers, not all powers.

You don't change the law every time a new drug gets approved, you grant it certification (the framework of which is based in existing legislation). You'd only need Congress to get involved if you wanted to change the approval process itself
330k is his earnings from only a little over half of the season. It is probably only half of earnings this year also, considering that an equal amount is likely made from sponsorships, given that Yoshihito is Japan's second highest ranking ATP player. Top 150 players usually have separate sponsorships for both clothing and racquets. A quick search reveals Yoshihito has brand ties to Yonex, Morinaga & Company, Miki House and AFH.
The associated costs being higher is inflation, which he adjusted for, and there's lots of working from home nowadays, which means you need even less property per person than back then.
Per the written opinion, Congress started purposely drafting vague laws with the intent of having them interpreted by unelected (politically appointed) officials in a manner that best suited their agenda.

So it seems reasonable to me that once the circumstances change (or we have more data), so would the law. It was a nice experiment, I'm glad we tried it, now we know people are people, and thankfully it's mostly done.
Gotta be careful with that too. If your password manager offers to auto-fill on the base domain - for example, *.google.com, it would be fooled by any phishing site hosted on google sites or google forms.
In a practical sense, the difference is one being asserted by influential regulatory bodies and courts. You might cheer them on or roll your eyes at them, but their influence makes it so regardless.

As for their justification, I think it's rooted in the scale and scope of these devices. Over the last 15 years, smartphones and tablets have shaped the world, ended up in almost every pocket, and become a prerequisite for access to increasingly many parts of one's life and career. Game consoles, in comparison, remain a luxury with far smaller relevance to what governments are tasked to take interest in.
Right, the breadmakers don't give a shit about this. That's ok, the breadbuyers like me don't give a shit either.
The constitution arguably wasn't designed for a government that did much of what it's doing. Shouldn't be hard to pass an amendment to legalize it if it's that necessary right? We needed an amendment just to federally ban booze for God's sake.
I have a Sayl at work and that lumbar support is a literal piece of plastic, albeit well designed, that slides up and down. I can't believe that's a massive upcharge?
Indeed.

Despite FDR being quite popular with his New Deal laws, his own party was prepared to toss his ass out for trying to stack the Supreme Court in order to keep parts of his New Deal alive.

It would be political suicide for either side to do that.
Reminding NATO countries to adhere to the 2% of GDP spending stipulated in the terms of the alliance is "throwing NATO under the bus"? Or did he do something else I'm unaware of?
How about we ask the AI how it feels?

RIP in peace, VC money

https://chatgpt.com/share/f287f9aa-d5c8-4866-a5f0-65499079d5...
That's nice. AFAIK SRE retros are harder to get product buy ins. It could really depend on the team and the service they provide...
When encountering panics, the runtime output will tell you how to get the backtrace:

thread 'main' panicked at src/main.rs:3:7:
called `Option::unwrap()` on a `None` value
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace

It's true that neither rustc nor clippy complain about having a `Result<_, String>` return type. Maybe they should. It wouldn't be too hard to implement such a lint, but I would expect people to be annoyed by it.

I would argue that in 18 months there are plenty of chances to come across any of the documentation and blog posts that explain this, or to ask questions in https://users.rust-lang.org.

I want our toolchain to be as easy to use as possible, to make it best in class. I have a long list of things I'd like to see improve in Rust. The critiques in the article are not constructive, neither in presentation nor substance.
Best Visualizations of June on the Voronoi App
So even if they announced on the day of the first observation, that's not really much notice to do anything about it other than start prepping for accepting of loss of life. I would seriously hope it took some amount of time for other people to verify/validate trajectory than the first person that observes it.

At this point, we're still at the point of needing years if not decades notice for us to even have a chance of actually protecting from an impact in a meaningful way.
I’m surprised they didn’t turn that into a product, it sounds great.
> How the Most Important Celebrity Magazine of the Last 50 Years Started Endorsing "The Best Air Purifiers of 2024"

The notion of "Most Important Celebrity Magazine" is begging the question so hard that the question turned over its house keys and moved out. People has always been a magazine about things that don't matter whatsoever. Now it's a website about different things that don't matter. It evolved from a waste of paper to a waste of electrons, and I can't think of a single reason we should care.
I have only grade school understanding of the branches but I was taught the executive branch is supposed to enforce what congress decides with laws which this reversal seems to support.
The Supreme Court doesn't resolve cases directly, they resolve questions of law for lower courts to take into account. They are meant to be experts in law, so there's no problem there. The lower courts can't be experts in everything, but bear in mind two things:

1. Courts have expert witnesses and a whole system around how they are called, challenged and questioned. Judges are trained to learn what they need to know from witnesses.

2. Good court systems do have expert judges they can draw on.

I recently took part in the Craig Wright case in the UK as a witness. Wright forged enormous quantities of evidence and proving the forgeries often required deep technical knowledge about file metadata, how computers worked etc. Fortunately the judge was deeply technical himself, being often a judge on complex patent cases, and had no difficulty with any of the complexities.
Given the train wreck of last night's "debate", project 2025 is that much more likely and fsm help us all.
> Except good luck having a phone without Play Store and Google Play services.

Xiaomi ? Amazon Fire ?
And more importantly getting the CEO involved in pencil procurement prevents the CEO from handling business development tasks that would bring in tons of mechanical pencil money. So it's penny wise but pound foolish.
This assumes a US Supreme Court that doesn’t exist in 2024. If you want it changed, you would have to either wait till the judges change, or expand the courts.
This will not force Congress to suddenly become a responsible and capable legislative body. It will result in there being less government. Fewer rules to protect consumers, fewer rules to keep our air, water, and ecosystem healthy, fewer rules to prevent the powerful few from exploiting the many.

Make no mistake about it, this is about giving more power to the powerful, and it's working. This is the swan song of America if we don't wake up.
> The existing system of administrative rules absolutely sucks for stability.

This new system is even worse. At some point, the Judiciary will make a poor ruling. Perhaps this ruling is impossible to hold to, but maybe the executive branch decides to usurp the court of its own volition. Then what?

The checks and balances system of our government only works when everyone plays nice. But if push comes to shove, then the executive branch is the one that holds all the power. They don't have to obey the legislator nor the judiciary -- neither has any real capability to enforce their will.

The country has been slow rolling into single pillar government structure for decades now. IMHO, this ruling is a huge step towards solidifying the executive branch as the de facto sole branch of government. Government agencies were provided a mechanism for all three branches of government to work together, legislators provided scope and leadership, the judiciary provided checks, and the executive provided the operations.

Once the agencies are all gutted, a future administration is going get an opportunity to act on their own via executive authority and they will ignore any attempts by the court to stop them, because the court is literally powerless in all but word. And that's what opens the door to a president who begins seizing assets of political opponents.

Lots of authoritarian countries masquerade as democracies because legislators and judiciaries are inherently powerless to stop executives.

I know plenty of people will counter with the old way was supporting an authoritarian executive. But to them, I'll point out that the agency system has ~100 years of efficacy behind it.
You don't have to live in fear of turbulence when flying, just keep your seatbelt on when you're seated. Turbulence is fairly rare but it's still a numbers game. The probability that you experience it the 99% of the time you're seated is much higher than the probability of experiencing turbulence while standing, especially since pilots proactively turn on the seatbelt sign when turbulence is expected.
Abcsounds: Little project I'm making to help younger cousins learn letter sounds
https://users.rust-lang.org

https://internals.rust-lang.org

https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com
I didn’t know the space key did that. Sounds easier than open in preview which is my go to.
Cute.

Are there any MX-5-style EVs? I'm building up to my mid-life crisis, and need to know if it'll be an SL, A5, Z4, MX-5 or something new... The MX-5 itself will be electric in 2026, it seems, but are there options?
Try out phind.com for an example. The LLM generates a query for the search engine to fetch web results. It can include clickable links to the sources in its response.

They accomplish this by training/fine-tuning the LLM to output special tokens, or special syntax, which is interpreted in code to perform some action, such as calling out to an API. This is how chatgpt and Gemini are able to automatically search the web and generate images and such. Yes, LLMs just output tokens, but those tokens can be interpreted to perform actions in code.
Also, you may lose your bank card randomly any time (lost wallet etc).

While waiting for the new card, having some cash at home and/or backup account with with a backup card at home can be useful.
I would prefer less regulation than more, so this is welcome.
One that was written from scratch, by me. All others are terrible.
They could expand the courts, institute justice term limits, or in this specific case, pass a law that says ambiguous terms in a law are to be interpreted by the Executive branch. If they are lazy, they could probably just stick in a clause that says the specific rules for this section will be created by the EPA or whatever relevant agency; and that would also comply with the ruling.
There's https://github.com/AboutRSS/ALL-about-RSS as well. And https://github.com/voidfiles/awesome-rss. Would be great to see the maintainers of these work together and combine them into one source.
well the Chicxulub impactor (The one that ended the Cretaceous Period) was estimated to be 10-15km. on the other end, the largest recorded asteroid in Siberia was 50-60m in size and did local but very noticeable damage[1], apparently 4x as powerful as the nuclear bomb that hit Hiroshima.

So 260m would be absolutely devastating, but wouldn't end civilization as we know it. it would absolutely destroy any state or smaller country it hit. if it hit/exploded above an ocean, we'd have record breaking tsunamis completely flood whatever coastal areas it hit.

1: https://www.euronews.com/culture/2023/06/30/culture-re-view-...
This is a straw man usually used by anti electric car people.

There’s always an impact. If you had a sandwich for lunch, the wheat in the bread destroyed a grassland somewhere.

Usually in context of energy, we’re talking about carbon impact.