skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
SEEKING WORK | Remote | United States / Anywhere | Full Stack Software Engineer

Linked In: https://www.linkedin.com/in/stevenirby1/

Resume: https://www.stevenirby.me/resume/

Email: <HN username at> stevenirby.me

Technologies: React, TypeScript, Next.js, Python, Django, node.js, Tailwind, etc.

I would love to help a team part-time or do short-term freelance work.

Here is what has been keeping me busy these days:

Freelance work.

https://randomdailyart.com

I shipped a Next.js / React app for artists to maintain artist profiles and submit art to my art newsletter. (MySQL, Prima, TypeScript, Tailwind, and React)

I finally sent my 2,500,000th email/piece of art. Onboarded 100+ artists.

https://randomdailyart.ai

AI version of the newsletter. (Go Hugo, Tailwind, vanilla TypeScript, and tailwind.css)

https://unfuck.email

My most ambitious project yet. An extension to fix email inboxes for Gmail. This is going live in a few weeks. (Vanilla class-based TypeScript, some React, tailwind.css)
The AI generated MacBook threw me off a little.
If it's easy to answer one or the other, perhaps let's start with that one.
Right - and there does have to be some kind of non native transform mixed in? At least with shell scripting this kind of thing has bitten me frequently.
Nope - and this is a key point. The framers intended there to be a mechanism to hold a president accountable - impeachment. But it is badly formed, and has never been used, even though arguably it should have been in every case it was used in.
Should an official act done in furtherance of a crime be official?

I think the problem is that the section regarding evidence, c3 iirc, says that any evidence implicating a criminal unofficial act must itself be unofficial, and not related to presidential acts.
Effect of Vitamin C on S. mutans from patients with dental caries (2020)
They had $10B in 2023 profits. This is simply not true. They are maximizing profits at the cost of other business inputs, just like Boeing.
I'm not sure the bulk of programmers are implementing CS concepts, except perhaps in a tautological sense. I think the Haskell sphere gives one a sense of what developing applications would look like if programmers really were implementing CS concepts.
I see that. Yikes! The hand in the photo (we are to undestand) copied a pair of nicely typeset 1s, featuring with an upstroke and serif foot, into a pair of sloppy hockey sticks that looks like lower case l's due to the pen trails, and could be taken for I.
I didn't know about Suhosin but this is completely unsurprising to me.

It's too bad my original comment got slammed because PHP deserves the slamming IMHO
American citizens have been drone striked without due process so that is in fact the reality we live in
I'm in CO so pay a lot of attention to this as it's a law to post salaries here. I really haven't seen THAT many CO excluded jobs. I definitely have seen them. More often than not I just see no mention of the statute/salary at all.

We used to have a site to track them but he shut it down https://mentallyanimated.com/coloradoexcluded.html There were big names, like Spotify, IIRC Adobe, on it.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/isabelcontreras/2021/11/01/what...

Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20210717051519/https://www.color...
John Deere announces mass layoffs in Midwest amid production shift to Mexico
> otherwise a politician paid by putin could remove the ability for the president to fire the nuclear weapons. You can’t have randos deciding what the leader can do.

No, apparently it’s much easier and safer to just pay off the president directly.
First Week as a SWE at a VC
Indeed, that was my first thought. (Almost) Every mainstream best in class open source product was at one point the kind of crappy open source alternative to an established product.
Blender didn't start as open source.
There is a certain amount of deliberate ambiguity to Article I Section 8 -- take a look at e.g. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/debates_817.asp and you can see that the wording "The Congress shall have power to [...] declare war" was revised from "make war" in the earlier drafts. Madison clearly felt that Congressional authorization was on some level required to conduct a war, but that the Executive should be free to act quickly in self-defense, e.g. to repel an invasion.
What if the President ordered the assassination of the head of a terrorist organization that attempted to overthrow Congress with physical force?
No, the Court said that the President could not be prosecuted for actions that the President takes while being The President. If the President is not being The President then they can be prosecuted. If the President beats his/her wife/husband, then they can be prosecuted because that's not something The President is involved in.
I would encourage you to think through other, more reasonable, interpretations of what I said.
How does that interact with the Posse Comitatus Act?
SCOTUS strikes down FL, TX social media content moderation laws
He would have been sued with no immunity. Either by Pakistan, or by members of the family, or whomever. The fact that they had no legal basis for it is inevitable, it still would have resulted in years and years of legal pain
The question becomes what if the President then uses their power to jail/execute political rivals? How would you rule that as unofficial? Tons of dictators jail rivals on the “official” business of maintaining order or peace or some other nebulous term. The presidents role to enforce law is so broad that it can be used to justify almost any act.
Haven't professors universally observed over the years that a flat 50% of people "just can't code"?
You can't really query all DNS records these days anymore by using the ANY query type. The closest alternative is to run dig across all record types.

At Andrew McWatters & Co., we use a small internal utility called digany(1)[1][2] that does this for you.

[1]: https://github.com/andrewmcwattersandco/digany

[2]: https://github.com/andrewmcwattersandco/digany/blob/main/dig...

andrewmcwatters@Andrews-MacBook-Pro digany % ./digany andrewmcwatters.com
andrewmcwatters.com. 1799 IN A 107.172.29.10
andrewmcwatters.com. 1800 IN NS dns1.registrar-servers.com.
andrewmcwatters.com. 1800 IN NS dns2.registrar-servers.com.
andrewmcwatters.com. 3601 IN SOA dns1.registrar-servers.com. hostmaster.registrar-servers.com. 1719805485 43200 3600 604800 3601
andrewmcwatters.com. 1800 IN MX 20 eforward5.registrar-servers.com.
andrewmcwatters.com. 1800 IN MX 15 eforward4.registrar-servers.com.
andrewmcwatters.com. 1800 IN MX 10 eforward1.registrar-servers.com.
andrewmcwatters.com. 1800 IN MX 10 eforward2.registrar-servers.com.
andrewmcwatters.com. 1800 IN MX 10 eforward3.registrar-servers.com.
andrewmcwatters.com. 1799 IN TXT "google-site-verification=39W1-Db36mrNNekPXww8TUdo7LcrmEUfv-gBmVTT1Dk"
andrewmcwatters.com. 1799 IN TXT "v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com a:andrewmcwatters-17ce78.andrewmcwatters.com ~all"
...
Location: California

Remote: Yes (US citizen)

Willing to relocate: Yes

Technologies: React, TypeScript, Next.js, Python, Django, node.js, Tailwind, etc.

Résumé/CV: stevenirby.me/resume

Linked In: https://www.linkedin.com/in/stevenirby1/

Email: <HN username at> stevenirby.me

After surviving multiple rounds of layoffs, I decided to quit and not wait for the final big one. (happened months later)

That was ~9 months ago. I’ve done ZERO leetcode practice. I’ve been too busy shipping for my users and customers.

Here is what has been keeping me busy.

https://randomdailyart.com

Shipped a Next.js/React app for artists to maintain artist profiles and submit art to the newsletter. Using MySQL, Prima, TypeScript, Tailwind, and React. Sent my 2,500,000th email/piece of art.

Onboarded 100+ artists.

Launched an AI version: https://randomdailyart.ai

(Go Hugo, tailwind, lots of cool vanilla JavaScript animations, and tailwind.css)

https://unfuck.email

My most ambitious project yet. Fix email with a browser extension. I ship daily. Using vanilla class-based TypeScript, some React, tailwind.css. Launching in a few weeks.
Differences between China Export markings
He was never convicted of a crime.

I'm trying to point out that it is not at all easy to draw a line between what a President could be prosecuted for and what he should be prosecuted for.

I'm pretty sure one could find abuse of power committed by about every President.

Even Jefferson - he wasn't empowered to make the Louisiana Purchase, but did it anyway.
I agree with Tavian Barnes' arguments 110%.
I don't think it is, to be honest. All three of those examples are clearly official acts. The President is commander-in-chief of the military, and is also responsible for granting pardons. The key piece of the ruling which lends credibility to her examples is that any motive or details behind the official acts are immune from scrutiny.

The only real difference is whether the acts are official or not. So the President is allowed to order the military to assassinate a political rival, but not to pay a private hitman to do so.

It's a pretty ridiculous and indefensible stance from the majority opinion.
GitLab is a really interesting example, but I don't know if it'd have positioned itself as an "open source alternative"

As for Mattermost, RocketChat, and Outline – I think these are great examples of projects positioned this way that haven't broken out. They all seem great, but it's not clear that being an "open source alternative" to Slack really worked for Mattermost...
380+ Platforms to Launch Your Products
the general public is expecting other people to protect them against it. "certainly someone (waves hands in the air) wouldn't allow it"

also combined with how the media has been reporting this, as though it's just another ruling.. certainly doesn't help.
Well yeah. But:

1. That's exactly why I prefer a plain old analog mattress that needs zero tech or support from anyone ever

2. Even with that being the case, for the average consumer who wants an electronic/controllable bed, it's still a better deal than anything that requires a custom home automation setup. Check out the prices for hiring somebody who can actually troubleshoot that.
> I think it means that he is liable for anything he does that is illegal if those illegal things aren't powers granted by the legislature.

Many disputes about presidential actions are about what the constitution allows.

The majority said In dividing official from unofficial conduct, courts may not inquire into the President’s motives. Nor may courts deem an action unofficial merely because it allegedly violates a generally applicable law.[1]

[1] https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf
The Past, Present, and Future of Lager Yeast
If he wants a civil war, sure.
SEEKING WORK | Minnesota | Remote | US

I'm a seasoned full stack software developer with a knack for fixing problems that other software vendors have created or outright abandoned. I've got extensive experience in developing high-transactional systems, data visualization, and custom web applications. My expertise includes .NET Core, C#, React, HighCharts, GraphQL, SQL Server, Azure, and AWS.

What I Do:

Backend: .NET Core, C#, SQL Server, Azure, AWS
Frontend: React, JavaScript, HighCharts
Data Visualization: Crafting interactive and dynamic charts using HighCharts
Cloud Services: Mastering Azure and AWS, including key management and secure data storage
Project Leadership: Leading technology consultation and software architecture design

Recent Projects:

Enhanced software for better living organ donation outcomes.
Built a high-transactional data processing solution for real-time FAA flight data.
Created a custom Umbraco CMS with complex document storage and search functionality.
Developed an interactive data report for a large branch of the US Govt.

Portfolio:

LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/clintmcmahon/
GitHub: https://github.com/clintmcmahon
Website: https://clintmcmahon.com

Contact:

Email: clint @ parkasoftware dot com

If you’ve got a project that's a bit of a mess need a new greenfield project created, let’s chat!
This is amazing! I have not been able to find a good free AE alternative yet and this looks quite promising!
Dagster Labs | Software Engineers, Product Managers, Designers | SF, Minneapolis, NYC or Remote | Full-time | Open-source

Dagster is the data orchestration platform built for productivity. Data engineers all around the world, in every industry, use Dagster to build scalable and maintainable data applications like ETL pipelines, ML training pipelines, data integrations and similar systems.

Data applications are the true core of AI and ML training systems, and our goal is to make Dagster the de facto standard for structuring these systems.

We’re an early stage, well-funded startup team with a proven track record of shipping open source software with global adoption. We put a premium on respectful, clear, and complete communication, and we expect each other to be creative, curious, effective, and empathetic.

More info: https://www.dagster.io/careers
Because they will stay in power rather than face accountability (real or imagined) for their actions (legitimate or illegitimate). See Caesar, J and the fall of the Roman Republic.
I'm not saying you shouldn't pay others. I'm just saying that iff you have the means, you might consider doing the work for free.
How would you prove anything if you can't present any of his actual conversations about Watergate as evidence?
It so hard for me to give up caffeine completely
`h` is for "hidden" layers.
Nextcloud and Bitwarden come to mind.
> As for the dissents, they strike a tone of chilling doom that is wholly disproportionate to what the Court actually does today—conclude that immunity extends to official discussions between the President and his Attorney General, and then remand to the lower courts to determine “in the first instance” whether and to what extent Trump’s remaining alleged conduct is entitled to immunity.

FYI, the court is not saying Trump is granting Trump blanket immunity. For three of the counts the court is saying Trump is probably not immune but prosecutors need to clarify that his acts were outside of the duties of his office.

> Unlike Trump’s alleged interactions with the Justice Department, this alleged conduct cannot be neatly categorized as falling within a particular Presidential function. The necessary analysis is instead fact specific, requiring assessment of numerous alleged interactions with a wide variety of state officials and private persons. And the parties’ brief comments at oral argument indicate that they starkly disagree on the characterization of these allegations. The concerns we noted at the outset—the expedition of this case, the lack of factual analysis by the lower courts, and the absence of pertinent briefing by the parties—thus become more prominent. We accordingly remand to the District Court to determine in the first instance—with the benefit of briefing we lack—whether Trump’s conduct in this area qualifies as official or unofficial.
You're misreading the text. It's not saying "if presidents assassinated their rivals they'd cannibalize themselves", it's saying "if executive branches got in the habit of prosecuting past presidents for official acts we'd be in a load of trouble, and that's a more likely scenario than assassinations."
KiCad.
> You can't just frame things however you want.

The decision literally states "In dividing official from unofficial conduct, courts may not inquire into the President’s motives."

He can claim the assassination was an official act in defense of national security, and no amount of "but he owed the guy money!" matters.
There's one crucial flaw. What is and is not covered by immunity can only be decided by a court, after the fact.

Intimidating the court into ruling in your favor with guns to their heads is an official act until the court says it isn't official, but the court can't say it isn't offical, because they've got guns to their heads.
"Representing Justice": Exploring the invention and iconography of courts
You realize there are such things as corporate policies, right?
Some progressives cared, and that was about it.

He also passed an EO afterward which set up a legal framework retroactively justifying it.
> If everyone's pessimistic about the future and doesn't even try then we'll never accomplish anything.

Historically people can and do rise to the occasion in face of impending tragedies (eg wars, famines, genocide) and try to mitigate and cope with the disaster. Sometimes more, sometimes less, but generally a bad outlook is not enough to render people passive.
Read the opinion.
The scenario you describe has never been the case and is already settled law. The president has largely been already held to be immune from litigation for their official acts while president. In fact, it was a huge debate because Clinton got sued civilly by Republican activists for various reasons and SCOTUS held that the trial could proceed while he was president. So in fact, the only time a president has been sued and had to participate while President was when the Republicans tried to jam up a Democratic one, in the middle of a war (Kosovo although some will claim that Clinton “started” that war precisely because of the lawsuit).

What’s specifically new here is the claim by SCOTUS that the President also has post-presidency immunity. It used to be you could use it as a defense whereby you provide evidence that you weren’t acting corruptly within your official acts. Now it’s a blanket immunity - a trial can’t even be brought and your motivations are largely irrelevant and immune from examination.
> It just gave the leader certain rights, and suddenly Hitler became the dictator, creating Nazi Germany

Not it didn’t give him those rights. The parliament (including moderate parties) explicitly granted him the power to so whatever he wanted after the nazis were already in power.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enabling_Act_of_1933
Explain that in Guantanamo
Many people successfully reduce or eliminate their caffeine intake with the right strategies and mindset.
Either! Basically any measure an objective observer could look at and be like, "oh yes this is a breakout hit with a bright future ahead of it"
I’m a physicist working on QC. I know we actually don’t know if a “secret” QC exists somewhere, but given that major theoretical and engineering breakthroughs are needed to build a fault tolerant one (and all QC companies are facing this regardless of whether their qubits optical, superconducting, trapped ions etc), I’d put that possibility to near zero. Consider also the talent and expertise that is needed for such an endeavour…
To extend the absurdity further. If the President truly believes that if their rival winning the presidency would endanger democracy, it would be the _duty_ of the President to take that action.

This seems like a path towards civil war.

[edit]
Thinking about a way out of this mess. Here's a proposal.

Biden asserts that he has this right, writes up a new amendment taking the right away, gives a date by which he will take action if the amendment has not been passed.

(Then he should probably resign for effectively blackmailing the legislative branch)
The AI we could have had
Doubly so since almost everyone stopped bothering to declare war after WW2.
Although it may have been propaganda, the line about not having to worry about the pile of clothes leading to better sex is pretty darn compelling...
Laptop performance.
There is a vast difference between a rare, honest mistake, and an attenpt to mitigate them...

vs willingly knowing you are introducing corrections that are ridiculously wrong.

Advocating and being a champion for inaccuracy, really isn't a positive. You should find a new thing to quote about yourself.
Biden can order seal team 6 to clear out scotus, appoint new judges. If congress denies, then send the seal team 6 to congress. Seal team 6 FTW
This is how I got into web development. I was taking a web design class in college (back in 2002 or so). I had built a 20-ish page site for a project and got tired of copying and editing my header and footer. Initially I used frames, but then I discovered php. My professor was pissed at me because, in her mind, this was the art department, not the CS department, and if I wanted to do that stuff I should get out of art. Little did she know that I was getting minors in both while studying 3d animation.
Judicial review didn't exist until the Supreme Court invented it out of thin air as well! Since the foundation of the country, we have allowed the SCOTUS a degree of legislation from the bench.
"The CE mark certifies that a product has met EU consumer safety, health, or environmental requirements."
** Trunk Tools | Engineers | Full-Time | US REMOTE or ONSITE NYC **

Trunk Tools creates software to make construction more efficient and cost effective, we have significant revenue and are growing extremely quickly! We're a team with prior experience at SpaceX, PlanGrid, Carta, LinkedIn, Uber, etc.

We spent the last few years building the brain behind construction. Now we are deploying workflows/ agents, starting with Q&A document chatbot, to be ingrained in construction teams’ workflows, ultimately to automate construction. Given our immense traction with several Fortune 500 construction companies, we are doubling our team in order to deploy several more agents this year. You will have an opportunity to drive the transformation of a multi-trillion-dollar industry full of waste, risks and inefficiencies.

We're looking for:

* Director of AI (NYC or Remote US) [1]

* Full Stack / Implementation Engineer (NYC or Remote US) [2]

* Senior Machine Learning Engineer (NYC or Remote US) [3]

* Full Stack Engineer (Frontend Architect) (NYC or Remote US) [4]

Examples of relevant experience for some of these roles would include semantic and lexical search, RAG, knowledge graphs, fine-tuning models, prompt engineering, MLOps, parsing unstructured data, enterprise search, node.js, typescript, react, python. A great candidate would have experience with many of these, not just one.

Feel free to email your resume and a note over to rob+jul24@trunk.tools

[1] https://trunktools.com/careers/?ashby_jid=e6b8a171-40a9-431f...

[2] https://trunktools.com/careers/?ashby_jid=8f09c6bb-5c64-4c06...

[3] https://trunktools.com/careers/?ashby_jid=eb3a6174-d36e-4da9...

[4] https://trunktools.com/careers/?ashby_jid=1d862ead-741b-4ce2...
My limited understanding of the ruling:

The ruling states that the President is immune from prosecution while exercising official duties of the office of President but can be investigated by a special counsel that is appointed by an act of Congress, and if successfully impeached and convicted can then be charged with said crimes. “Unofficial” acts are not protected by this immunity but a special counsel is still required to be appointed by an act of Congress to investigate and then bring forward charges.

Out of context this is quite reasonable and level headed. In context of the hyper partisan landscape US politics are today, doesn’t seem likely without a supermajority opposition to be able to bring charges against a president, for official or unofficial acts that are crimes.
gcc comes to mind. Remember when every computer came with its own C compiler? LaTeX also killed proprietary mathematics typesetting.
That's not really a coherent stance though, given how many "protect the constitution" laws they keep overturning in the name of "it's not actually written in the constitution".
> like, those assume the court will find anything to be an official act, which is nonsensical.

But the Supremes haven't said what they think an official act is; that's a matter for the court of first instance, according to the Supremes.

To me, in the UK, it looks like vandalism. There's no clear law on what constitutes an official presidential act, and until there is, the Pres is beyond the reach of the law.

I don't think these very senior lawyers are fools, I don't think they made a mistake. They've deliberately fucked-up the US legal system (even more than it's already a mess).