skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Willpower, propensity for addiction, susceptibility to sugar, etc. aren't equally distributed.

The people you're preaching to have tried all those things. Your advice cashes out into "land better in the distribution like me and then confuse it for a character trait like I do".
Virtue Signalling in the Workplace – Utopia [video]
> Then why write at all?

I think this question nearly sums up the creative crisis at the heart of much of the AI hype. But, hey, it's a pretty big paint brush.
ESPN's 30-for-30 episode "Broke" is a great watch. It does seem though that newer generation athletes are a bit better educated in that matter since they're better connected online, but that might just be anecdotal.
I think all of these approaches are not "or" but are instead "and" ...

We need both PV solar and "let's get some heat" solar; we need LiFePO4 and nmc batteries; we probably even need to keep fossil fuels and biodiesel and other biogas.

Every little incremental bit helps... It's a race between turning into venus and turning into mad max's thunderdome.
Oh, do fuck off. Copyright exists so that copyright owners have control over who uses their content and for what. Search brings visitors so that kind of use is beneficial to both parties. Training models that repurpose and recombine other copyright owners' IP and assigning copyright to the patchwork created using LLMs is not beneficial to the original copyright owner and is pure theft. Has Microsoft looked at what Adobe did a couple of weeks ago and thought "we haven't had shit thrown at us for a while, we'll have some of that, please?"
This already happened and MS sent a cease and desist.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HiQ_Labs_v._LinkedIn
Skin in the game is important.

I have a terrible programmer friend.

He is better at creating actual products than most people I met because his livelihood is on the line: he makes money only from websites.

So he is not living in the abstract idea of best practices, he had to make it profitable for the last two decades, with little resources to go by on top of that.

And he does.

After 10 years, he is still asking me how to write git commands. And I'm still learning from him to shed a lot of BS from my practices.
Or even more grotesque, that the suffering for death is a key part to a righteous afterlife.
Welcome to the Age of Magnesium [video]
I tried not buying food with added sugar but it’s surprisingly difficult. Here is an interesting analysis I did some time ago which shows that for half of the food items, sugar is the main ingredient: https://scrapingfish.com/blog/scraping-walmart
It's not about "anti-intellectualism." I think cognitive elites, of which expert bureaucrats are a part, are critical to running society. But they have a moral obligation to stay in their lane. Elites must use their capabilities to do what the public wants them to do. Both in the U.S. and Europe, they have not been doing that, but instead have been abusing their authority to impose their own ideologies.

Consider the 2016 "Resistance" by federal employees to the election of Donald Trump. The public had clearly voted against immigration and free trade. At that point, the job of the federal bureaucracy was to put aside their own views about whether immigration and free trade were good things, and use their skills to implement the agenda of their duly elected new boss. Instead, they publicly and vocally declared their insubordination, both to the President and the public who elected him. Likewise, during the 2020 George Floyd riots, you saw public health experts allow their moral ideology to affect their expert recommendations--treating religious gatherings as somehow being different from social justice gatherings.

My belief is that these things directly led to the debacle of the pandemic, when people refused to trust experts on vaccination--despite Trump telling them to take the vaccine. My dad spent his life working as a public health expert in the third world, and what happened was, while disappointing, not a surprise to him. A huge part of public health work is getting people to trust you. And you must earn that trust by putting the job first. If you go into a village in Bangladesh and people don't want to be treated by a woman doctor, you provide them a male doctor. You don't chastise them for their "sexism." My dad actually worked for a Planned Parenthood affiliate in Bangladesh. At least back in the 1980s, they were providing family planning services consistent with local beliefs, and not trying to impose western ideals on the public--something that would have swiftly destroyed trust.

Most people who aren't that smart understand that and are deferential to their betters. But they also have an intuitive and accurate sense of what's an exercise of expertise, and what's a moral or political judgment. And when experts step out of their lane, they destroy the trust that's critical to doing their jobs.
This is probably true, but if we are talking about climbing the corporate ladder here...that is primarily done through peacocking to management and networking well enough to get to the next rung, not through being very productive. If you are a 10x employee, why would a company want to elevate you out of that and into management?

But if you're going a different, more self-starter focused path, income opportunities should be increased, yes.
For an unelected panel of judges to come in, above the agencies, and tell them how the president is allowed to enforce laws is a perversion of the constitutional order and separation of powers—and a repudiation of democracy itself.

It's a curious take. My understanding is that it is curbing the ability of the executive to issue laws (by calling them regulations), ie congress is not allowed constitutionally to delegate its law issuing powers away. So the power for the executive to issue new laws has to be extremely limited. State agencies officials are as unelected as judges. Congress cannot vote that an agency can issue any rule it wants for the environment for instance.

I know it is frustrating to have to go through congress to make changes but that's the very definition of democracy, the progressive accumulation of power in the hands of the executive is not.
Can run in the background, pilot can use any other app meanwhile. Or just leave the iPad with screen off. Our app keeps recording and alerting as long as you are in flight.
This looks nice, first time I’m seeing it. Just curious, what feels rough?
I doubt it would change my opinion though. It's a matter of principle for me.
This used to work for me. I'm also fairly frugal by nature, so it was very easy to just not buy the stuff while grocery shopping.

But then I got married, and had offspring. I don't do the majority of the shopping any more, and no longer have absolute control of what enters my pantry. And so now I eat everything.
> It's ok, doctors hurt people for years while learning to save them.

Modern medical education doesn't work this way.
If you download weights and keep them around this kind of thing works forever. Well, until the model starts showing its age due to the cutoff date.
Does the crew also lose internet when flying over the arctic circle?
programming is such a young field wirh many iterations that good advice is hard. I should have probaly made my own programming language!
She did re-marry after Johns death.

Tragically, her father also committed suicide. Mental health is not something that was as well respected back then as it is now.
Cold Turkey has always worked best for me. Quitting smoking by gradual reduction just never seemed practical. If it works for others, more power to them!
Anyone with more than a 9 figure net worth usually has multiple full-time bodyguards. That's also because there are usually psychotic randos that are stalking them if they have any kind of fame. It's a trivial expense at that level of net worth. Public filings from Facebook show that Mark Zuckerberg spends $10 million annually on personal security. Elon said at Twitter he doesn't even go to the bathroom without his bodyguards.
> in its own words

LLM's have no words of their own.

Imagine training a LLM vs a group of people from birth on wrong information. The LLM will unquestionably just repeat in "its own words" the wrong information, whereas the group of people will of course believe some of the wrong stuff, but they will also doubt a lot of it as well.

You could say that an LLM is just not good enough yet so the comparison isn't fair. In other words that people are just even more LLM'ing than the LLM, but there simply is no mechanism for an LLM to go from wrong information to right information.

People on the other hand will always doubt, hypothesize, and compare and contrast whatever information they have to at least attempt to form correct answers from correct information. This in a sense is because they actually have their own words.

There is, as of today, never been a smart or creative thing an LLM has ever said that doesn't literally come from other people's words. If LLM's are smart, it's because people are smart.
I think reading code to understand because you forked a project and want to continue it is very different to following tutorials.
I'd say your optimism is unfounded - copyright in the digital realm started out as a free for all, and turned into a sh*tshow, that kinda is still unresolved to this day. And these are issues that arose 20, 30 years ago.

If AI follows the digital copyright model, what'll happen is that interest groups with true legal muscle behind them (music, movie industry, etc.) will enforce their interests with draconian laws, and everybody else will be left to fend for themselves.
I dislike this sentiment and what it represents for/in US society now.

In the old country, we were constantly on guard, because when that guard was let down, you were taken advantage of. Case in point, my dad left his radio ( removable precisely, because of what happened next ) in the car once, when he came home for 15 minutes, within that 15 minutes the windows was broken and radio stolen. The parking lot was scoured regularly. You were being watched. Another time, my mom picked a bigger sum from a bank ( not her money, it was client's money for case ). She put it in a bag. She left the bag in her office for mere minutes to go to the bathroom and left her bag in her office as she normally does. The bag was gone when she came back.

By comparison, when I first came to US, I could not believe people kept cars and windows open. It felt like a very different world, which made me want to be a part of it. I absolutely hate that this old world mentality has been transferred here and was normalized.

edit: I will add one more thing. It used to be having money was not a bad thing ( it was the opposite; it was aspirational ), because it was not that hard to get money if you had some sense. It is harder now and it also appears to be at least related to vilification of anyone with money ( not even rich or wealthy ).

edit2: added for/in in first line
Too late, people are already using AI to embellish CVs and hirings managers are using AI to screen applications and CVs... with that level of stupidity I expect stuff to start falling out of the skies soon.
I believe the origin of Scalabrines channel was from people who absolutely grilled his performance while he was pro. He came out and said "If you think I suck so much, come 1v1 me." He then promptly stomped his detractors on the court
> It's like you went on a trip and your vehicle is having technical issues, but you are at the hotel so you can extend your stay until the car issue is sorted out. Any reasonable person would call it stranded.

I think it's a little more complicated than that.

Starliner has many redundant systems; from what I can tell, NASA accurately says that it is (probably) safe for Astronauts to return to earth in the vehicle.

However, all of the leaks and thruster problems are in the service module which will burn up on re-entry. Which means that none of the malfunctioning hardware can be examined once the vehicle lands. A big part of the delays are NASA and Boeing trying to recreate the problems on the ground.

There was a helium leak before the vehicle was launched, and the only reason NASA gave the OK is because they thought the understood the problem. But then 4 more leaks sprung up - one of which is quite large; it's pretty clear that NASA and Boeing did not understand the problem. So I think they're trying to be extra cautious.

All that being said, I don't want to make it seem like I think everything is OK or that I'm a Boeing apologist. This is a "test" flight, but really it's supposed to be a demonstration that the capsule is built to standard and is performing properly. It is not.

It is as if you went for a test drive at a dealership, and the breaks stopped working, but you were able to use the e-break to stop and get back to the dealership. Technically, you were "safe"... but it's also not a good experience.
This is just wrong. Under Chevron you still had legal recourse, just the judges sided with regulation experts in ambiguity

Also those federal agencies operate as matter of law. You don't really get to just have "disagreements" with the law and have recourse - that's not a reasonable expectation in the first place
To legally run Windows you need a licence, not an activation key.

The instalation can already be downloaded for free.
Fruit juice is basically liquid candy. For most people there's nothing wrong with drinking a little bit but the effects on blood sugar are similar to eating candy. (This is not medical advice for diabetics.)
Not an "Ask HN", flagged
> They're just negligent

Ah, yeah, just a little harmless negligence. In that case, I’ll keep blocking all their ads, and feel 100% morally and ethically in the right.

Edit: and in the case of this article, the ad service is Google, and the site serving the ads is Google.com. Not a great look for a trillion dollar company.

For a company of this size, not taking steps to prevent all malicious ads from being created before they’re even served once is a deliberate choice they’ve made, which I would argue amounts to Google deliberately serving its customers malware.
Test pilots doesn't mean their lives should be treated as expendable. Every possible step should be taken mitigate known risks.

> They even launched with a helium leak

I don't know how big of an issue this is,but I wonder how much of that decision was based on engineering vs pressure to launch as they were way behind schedule.

Reminds me of the challenger space shuttle disaster [1], where the chief engineer (from a contractor) flat out refused to sign off on the launch due to several safety concerns, but NASA pressured them and overruled them and then tried to cover up their mistake.

Quotes from [1]:

> "And I made the smartest decision I ever made in my lifetime," McDonald told me. "I refused to sign it. I just thought we were taking risks we shouldn't be taking."
Your Letters Helped Challenger Shuttle Engineer Shed 30 Years Of Guilt
The Two-Way
Your Letters Helped Challenger Shuttle Engineer Shed 30 Years Of Guilt

> McDonald persistently cited three reasons for a delay: freezing overnight temperatures that could compromise the booster rocket joints; ice forming on the launchpad and spacecraft that could damage the orbiter heat tiles at launch; and a forecast of rough seas at the booster rocket recovery site.

> The NASA official simply said that Thiokol had some concerns but approved the launch. He neglected to say that the approval came only after Thiokol executives, under intense pressure from NASA officials, overruled the engineers.

[1] https://www.npr.org/2021/03/07/974534021/remembering-allan-m...
You could argue that some chocalate might melt. But herbs and wine are fine with a heat cycle.
so pretty stable, and you're mad that other people won't do free work for you to implement a mostly unused spec.
I just found out about this app recently and love it. Hard to believe I ever fired up a full blender instance and video project to cut clips, much less regularly.
UBI, FTW.-
Congress will have to be specific, yes. And we'll be able to vote them out if we don't like what they say.
Funny how all those "thought leaders" do end up in jail even though everyone seeing them steal all they can is already thinking.
Nonsense. Fruit has fiber and all sorts of nutrient benefits. Even your smoothie claim is false: https://www.stylist.co.uk/fitness-health/nutrition/smoothies...
ImHex has so far been the best hex editor I’ve used for a few reasons. Some of these exist in other editors but rarely all together.

1. File templates mean that it auto highlights sections of known file types.

2. It shows how selected bytes may be interpreted as pretty much every common data type that I would want and does so simultaneously.

3. It’s significantly faster than other editors for me when I use large files

On the downside, the imgui ui gets buggy sometimes but it’s replaced my use of other viewers like HexFiend, hexa etc…
Weird Al: Deja Vu (But Worse)
Verifying that your vendor hasn't done anything dumb is hard.

Supporting your customers when they have problems is hard.

Debugging issues with a thrird party in the loop is hard.

Just because you farmed out auth doesn't mean you get to stop monitoring for breaches, or doing all the other things you need to do to have an eye on security.

Farming out auth just ads a recurring cost per user and complexity that your going to ignore till its a bigger issue than dealing with this up front would have ever been.
I vaguely recall visiting Boston c1990 and discovering pay phone calls there were still 10¢, while they had been 25¢ in Indiana as long as I could remember. I'd be curious when and where the last ten-cent phone call was made.
I respect their decision. I only hope that I have this option when the time comes. Watching my father, wither away in agony, was absolutely awful. I don't want that for my family, and I think it's my human right to decide my exit.
Doesn't this fuck things like the 400ft drone limit and remote id and a bunch of other shit as well?
I think the $700 of fast gains won't feel like $700, so you probably wouldn't experience the full utility of whatever fancy thing you buy.
https://github.com/akissinger/chyp
Your comment was appropriate and well-measured. No offense taken. I wish you well.
Cool but it sure feels like "SETTLED LAW" doesnt mean shit anymore.
At least on desktop, there's also a link to the main site in the About section of the repo. This might actually be a better link for the HN submission, as I bet there's a non-zero intersection of hex editor users and people who completely do not understand Git whatsoever (assuming they've even heard of it).
Yeah let's go build some shoddy bridges and crash some planes while we're at it.

Individuals can be new to a practice and feel like imposters but we shouldn't be pointing to statistics like this as an example of why it's ok.

I can't believe people think like this.
This doesn't answer the question. The question is if fruit are associated with negative health outcomes in a human population.

What you're doing is saying inflammation is bad and then inferring that exercise is bad because it increases inflammation.
This seems like any normal prompt jailbreak, what's different?
The problem is that we have FPTP elections which mean the alternate candidates are non-viable. Anyone who can fundraise for a successful primary campaign has enough ties to moneyed interests to become part of the swamp.
Yes generally, whole fruits are considered healthy in any quantity from what research I’ve heard about.

https://youtu.be/bHnsawfk43Y
It’s not about ads, it’s about distribution. If people find your product via google then SEO matters (at least for the page they land on).
> "It’s really easy to write terrible code. But it’s also really easy to write code that follows absolutely every best practice, with 100% test coverage, and has been fuzz-tested and mutation-tested for good measure – your startup will just run out of money before you finish. So a lot of programming is figuring out the balance."

The situation appears to be changing rapidly. 15 years ago there were no advanced code-generating LLMs, and while relying on them for the core logic without having a good understanding of the language and system is still a bit iffy, it does seem that they're pretty good for generating tests and spotting deviations from whatever your group has decided are best practices.
You're right, the serial is FRANGACP04 which seems to be the 13" one. The problem is that this appears nowhere on the laptop or software (I'm sure it'll be there if I open the chassis up, but I shouldn't need a screwdriver to find my laptop's model).
That's a really weird turn of phrase, because the courts, even the Supreme Court, cannot arbitrarily act on its own. A case must be brought to the court. Even then, congress sets the jurisdiction for these courts. To call this a "power grab" is hyperbole.
Many years ago I remember seeing this same focused sunlight design being used to generate electricity directly from the heat.
Oh — yes. I’m familiar with that. I don’t think (if you actually read the original source of the quotes rather than just finding the language offensive, which it seems almost no one does) it quite warrants the term ‘racist’, though.
If you're a bit motivated, I recommend PostgreSQL. I had never used it before, but in two days, I managed to use it correctly on a real project! Here's what I did:

Start with SQL using this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXV3zeQKqGY&t=2611s

Then PostgreSQL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qw--VYLpxG4

And for using it in production, here's Supabase and a tutorial to get started with PostgreSQL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dU7GwCOgvNY

That's 10 hours of video, and thanks to that, as a beginner, I managed to create a database for a site with 10,000 users per month. Good luck!
I've never had the fans that loud in mine. I intentionally don't have a dGPU, because I have no need for it. The cooling is fine on the base unit with APU only.

The CPU temp can get high, but that is expected for these chips. They will run up to max temps and throttle to maintain peak performance under the current conditions.
The problem I have—even with a functional Congress—is that laws will be passed with political kickbacks in mind. Irrelevant nonsense like dairy subsidies tied to telecommunications regulation to secure the necessary votes.
Generally, whole fruits are considered to have positive health effects, even in studies of patients with diabetes, at nearly any quantities.

https://youtu.be/bHnsawfk43Y
I think we’d be better served if we stopped thinking of jailbreaks as “attacks” on LLMs. If a user decides they want to go and subvert the guardrails, they really should be able to. The attacks aren’t really going to go away any time soon, either; there’s always some other clever phrase that the RLHF hasn’t accounted for.

Instead of perennially worrying about the risks that the LLMs will say something bad when specifically prompted to do so, I’d rather the companies pay more attention to the problems with accuracy, with outputting copyrighted material (for their own sakes!), and with things like memorizing and regurgitating private information.
The seemingly lack of support of jupyter notebooks was the thing that kept me from giving it a honest try. I want the same experience as in the code editor.
Heaven forbid anyone find out how to make a molotov cocktail from an LLM, even though it’s easy to find with a simple search engine search.
Related: the notion of "safety" (refusing to discuss "harmful" content) is rather shallow and (relatively) easily undone: _Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Direction_ [https://arxiv.org/abs//2406.11717]
I don't think that distinction is key to the insinuation
This is the opposite of the research-backed claims on whole fruits from this video:
https://youtu.be/bHnsawfk43Y