skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Agreed. Also didn't get why he felt complying with the terms of the LGPL for a statically-linked .exe would be so much of a problem. Just put the object files and build script in a zip file, and upload it to the same webserver where you plan to put the program. Add a line in the "About" dialog (or whatever) pointing to it. Done.
> And at the end of the day it doesn't matter as long as they follow the design provided

This is a great way to be utterly replaceable in your job. "Tell me what to do" is the worst trait in an employee and puts you immediately in the "first to cut when possible" line.

> nobody will know every sport they're building a ui for, does that also disqualify them?

It makes them worse from an IC perspective, because they need hand-holding moreso than someone who gets the problem space more intuitively.

In ZIRP, it was easier to coast with what you're saying. Now, it's back to brass tacks - everyone is expected contribute and be more helpful to your boss and team in order to become more irreplaceable.
I know that's a joke, but in that case every screen is a grid of (v. small) boxes with arrows of zero length.
That is one crazy stock graph (zoom out to max):

https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/snbr

Bedco went up 10x during the pando.
I've wondered for a while if a new kind of news could be fashioned from the events of the world. Basically, if I were to try and define what items are most newsworthy, it'd be along the lines of what (according to my pop-culture understanding) Claude Shannon described, of the items that are most "surprising". But while we normally look at surprise as a subjective thing that impacts only one person, like an item that most conflicts with my current understanding and requires me to update my own model the most, we'd instead apply that to very large groups of people, or whatever group the "news" is being tuned to.

So, what items of news cause the most "change" (or surprise) to that group of people. All our understandings and notions of truth are based off of large chains of reasoning that are based off of premises and values. When a new event happens that changes a premise our understandings are based on, which events cause the largest changes in those dags?

We're regularly subjected to "news" that doesn't change anything very much, while subtle events of deep impact are regularly missed. Maybe it would be a way to surface those things. I wonder if someone smarter than me could analyze a data set such as this and come up with a revised set of headlines and articles over the years that do the best job of communicating the most important changes.
Patching the binary seems like a better way to do this.
When I worked at an online clothing retail store, I had zero interest in fashion, but I think I still did a pretty good job.

When I worked at a data mining/data broker startup, I had zero interest...--who's passion is it really to snoop on people and steal their information (FAANG)?

Anyway, I hope I made my (a) point.

EDIT: Fixed typo.
Very significant set back for China private sector space. This sort of incident will justifiably invite greater government scrutiny, which will inevitably slow down pace of testing and launch
If a company provides equity, then it might be a good question to ask. After all, the employee would be investing into the future the company.
It’s almost certainly “I watch sports from the set X of acceptable mainstream sports”
Politically, there are a lot of promised benefits that need to be delivered to old people and fewer and fewer working hands, meaning higher costs to deliver those benefits since labor prices rise.

This would necessitate larger than desired tax increases on the politically influential.

Solution: Reduce the quantity and quality of benefits as much as politically possible, but also import more working hands to reduce labor prices. That it helps support asset price increases is just an added benefit.
> Many jobs will pay similar money.

I think the point is, that for many people that simply isn't true.

Its a down job market right now. Unless you are super amazing, you are probably getting rejected a lot right now. Many people can't afford to spend years trying to find the perfect job - rent needs to be paid. And quite frankly 80% of tech jobs are basically the same and interchangeable. Silicon valley loves to claim they are changing the world, but at the end of the day, almost nobody changes the world with a SaaS app.
The functions and objects are the boxes, them calling each other are the lines =)
You would turn away an expert professional contributor, because they are only in it for the money? I would quit my job if it wasn’t for the money. Same applies to everyone I work with.
One can also think as an assembly instruction as origin and destination (line) and an operation (instruction).
Yeah I thought of this too. Wrapping this with Tauri should not be too hard, and quite space-efficient
The weavers style reminded me of the famous Darmok Star Trek episode https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darmok

Looking at the wiki article, indeed others have noted that already:

> Tamarian language was compared to the difficulty of communicating with an autistic 19-year-old patient by Elizabeth Kim et al.[12]
upvoting! "I also don't want a commit history that looks like London's tube system map"

i don't care how you do it. squashing? git reset followed by sensible commits? intense ninja-like git commit hygiene? or my favorite, liberal amounts of git rebase -i?

the only things i care about are these:

1. your PR contains a series of atomic commits

2. each commit makes a single logical change.

3. that each logical change is adequately described by the corresponding commit comment

4. extra credit if the series of changes is consistent to build and work at each step

i don't want to see "ONE" commit per-feature unless it's trivial.

i do want to see the development process, but in a "publish"-able form

i don't want to see "WIP", "almost working", "fixed broken", "redesigned ...", etc. sausage being made. i especially DON'T want to see patches to files be changed and reverted multiple times as mistakes are made and fixed.

the final PR should be you publishing a nice finished series of patches to accomplish a new feature.

then! we simply rebase that nice simple series on top of master and merge it with an optional merge commit. this gets you a nice linear history while avoiding the information loss with simply squashing everything in a PR/feature into a single commit.
Let me preface with: I’m neither a web dev nor experienced with accessibility.

Which tools did you use?
I’d argue a human probably also won’t review all your alt tags manually or you could just do it yourself, too. If you have lots of them it might make sense to extract them automatically and pipe them to some language model to generate a score for each of them. Then you can review the ones with the worst scores.

It seems to me that https://wave.webaim.org/ does a good job with ensuring contrast is good, etc., as once I followed all the recommendations things are also readable when using Dev Tools to simulate various vision deficiencies.
Hard to have an antenna with wireless headphones.
Reading a number on my phone screen is a much easier way to measure how much money I have than staring into my wallet and counting up the notes and coins. It's literally a finger tap away.

You are also eliding all the positive features of electronic payments, like being theft-proof, being much quicker to pay with, and being trackable for my own benefit.

> for-profit banks

The banks run their retail banking businesses as a loss leader for their savings accounts (the "deposit franchise"). If all the banks were mutualised transaction costs would probably go up, not down. Also, doesn't exactly the same argument apply to cash? Where do you think businesses get their cash floats from? They get them from banks.
> Pulling that off is the social skills test.

Surely the most significant side effect of any F2F interview is to evaluate social skills. An answer that the interviewer fully expects to be a lie just isn't required.

Anyway... "Why do you want to employ me over other candidates ? "
... https://archive.today/6Un3E ...

(In case you're seeing a redirect to a genital-in-a-cup, yet still wish to read TFA.)
Like I say, the question assumes that you have options.

At worst, you can answer about why you applied for that job and not others that are equally paid, even if they are in other industries (eg you got into programming because you like problem solving, and because of your experience you looked at the requirements and thought you would do well because of xyz).
> If people succeed in making that truly lifelike and humanlike, it will actually out-compete us for resource control. And will no longer be a tool we can use.

I believe it is almost certain that we will make something like this and that they will out-compete us. The bigger problem here is that too few people believe this to be a possibility. And when this becomes certainty becomes apparent to a larger set of people, it might be too late to tone this down.

AI isn't like the Atom Bomb (AB). AB didn't have agency. Once AB was built we still had time to think how to deploy it, or not. We had time to work across a global consensus to limit use of AB. But once AI manifests as AGI, it might be too late to shut it down.
It's not controlled by the state, but funded by it. There's a kind of a people's council everyone can join and vote about stuff which in part control the direction of it, it's called SRG.

People in Switzerland still trust their state and institutions:
https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/democracy/why-people-in-switzer...
Had some discussions about the infamous corporate corruption trials that the US wages against foreign (mostly EU based) companies.

People here assured me that the US justice system was not leaning heavily on these companies because they were foreign in a bid to tank said companies a trigger a fire sale to an American company.

I was also assured that US companies would get the same treatment. I can't wait to have this fair justice dealt.
Same here. People are confused because the author gave two options:

1. Bundle the .dll as a resource into the app and make it extract it to some temporary folder, then use P/Invoke and call the compiled .dll from within the C#/.NET app.
2. Use C++/CLI.

And then a single "problem" paragraph that didn't make it clear which problems go with which approach.
How Google migrated billions of lines of code from Perforce to Piper
You could probably replace "Obesity Drugs" with a lot of other things and the title could stay unchanged.
Looks like yor impression of IDEA is from around 15 years ago.
I guess it’s a sense of why do I need a PASSION for it. I’ll do it , but my passion more so lies in say not starving to death while enjoying my hobbies rather than caring more than I need to about YOUR product
...but still occasionally right on the money and often pretty close.
admittedly, a pretty funny redirect
> The default output format of a pipe is RSS.

Do people still use RSS feeds?

I work on a similar product[0], conceptually at least, to Pipes, and many of our users have asked for RSS feeds as output.

Until now I’ve rationalized that as low priority, but maybe I’m wrong?

[0] https://magicloops.dev
I don't think I ever got below 64kps in my own testing before the audio quality fell apart.

I was using a Palm PDA, so I found a player that supported ogg. That allowed me to push to 48kps (or maybe even 32kps) with "acceptable" quality.
Financing is different from doing it. Also, from my country’s experience they usually give loans (and are not a partner/owner); so they don’t really care about the project outcome.
No, manufacturers have come to expect monthly revenue on top of getting paid for the hardware.
Here in Switzerland, they would probably just mail you a bill to pay via e-banking.
n8n is a similar tool and can be self-hosted: https://n8n.io

And NodeRED is big in the home automation space: https://nodered.org
Empirical evidence can suggest anything you want it to if you choose to ignore empirical evidence that's inconvenient to you.

The Canadian trucker protesters were not "terrorists" by any stretch of imagination, but sure let's assume otherwise because it helps us sleep better at night, right?
Wouldn’t Electron solve this problem?

Build a web app and use Google V8 with your c++ code.
Actually the one you write yourself (#PORTO) and the one to print (InternetMarke) are both equally prominent in the app.
Do you mean the functionality itself (inherent in the capabilities of a dynamic ELF loader) or specifically that it uses an environment variable? Maybe moving it to static configuration in ld.so.conf would cut down on abuse.
Related submission is already flagged off the front page:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40842808
The poor commit quality is your issue here, and squashing is merely a way to avoid addressing it. That only makes squashing a good tool to use to make a big mess a slightly smaller mess.
Because the boxes and lines are just an abstraction.
A and B sound actually interesting while C, D, and E are likely going to be highly bureaucratic quagmires.
Blockly (the visual editor used by Scratch) elegantly shows hierarchy of control flow. I've never seen a boxes-and-lines visual editor where loops are as easily understood as Blockly pieces.
Not just that's they have

- per session ssh keys that are valid for only 6 hours

- all ssh sessions are audit logged and have to go through jump servers tied to tech roles

- all sessions fully monitored via "script" and can be replayed

You can also see a write-up here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40840040
We all know what “I played LaCrosse” is code for.

I didn’t get to play piano because we were poor. But we still watched basketball and football.
Isn't hardening source code parsing much more difficult then hardening byte code parsing?

Sure, the output of the lua compiler might be guaranteed to not invoke undefined behavior in the byte code interpreter, but the compiler itself might be vulnerable.

To my knowledge, compilers like GCC and clang treat source code as trusted for this reason
TLDR: building projects with Clang is now about 4% faster due to optimizations in the way it internally handles assembly.
it never has been my experience! i have used lazyvim distro for the last year or so and run some :Lazy update for time to time and usually i just need to close neovim and restart and it will all be working well..

I think i had an issue when they moved to conform.nvim from the deprecated language server based method but that's maybe about it (I deleted the nvim cache and it was all good after)
Yes this is my side-project. The core of the UI was created by ChatGPT and then polished :)
Which basic features are missing from the editor?
It’s not always demand. Lots of people don’t want smart TVs, but that’s too bad. The smart TVs are subsidized to manufacture because the software can put more advertising on, which makes it a supply-side issue.
> The absolute bone headed move they did is they continued to promote and sell their legacy models front and centre cannibalizing their own future growth.

That's kind of exactly what I meant, though.

Nokia made an almost identical mistake, before the Microsoft acquisition, by not doing a timely migration path from Symbian to Meego. The old business was a cash cow so they kept it going, not taking the new thing seriously.
inertia.js is his choice (see his comments). Not bad actually.

As I already said: My comment was not meant totally serious, I also hate this framework hopping... although hono.js is promising.
This is some really old-school statement... If you, as a manager, would hire for a software engineering professional, the last thing you'd want is a servant for your coding problems.

If loyalty is not a big concern (and it isn't really, currently), then I'm there to bring your business up to speed, and you're there to help me advance in this job market.

Engineering is a constant balancing act. If working with this kind of manager favors conformity over business requirements, technical requirements, legal requirements etc. we'd be having a very hard time disagreeing on topics (balancing them out) and working together.
I'm not passionate about commodity futures trading. I don't care about it at all. But when I work on software which traders will use, I understand that there are specific conventions about how the numbers are displayed and that they need to be understood and used.
Did they actually fly? Or lean on the wind? Because recently there has been news of spiders flying.. not really flying but traveling through the air via wind
While Google is a monorepo, that doesn't mean that every part of the codebase is equally critical.

People don't yolo submit CLs to core library components for example.

OTOH submitting somewhat hacky code to a new project while you iterate on it doesn't harm the rest of the code base that much since very little will depend on it.
I don't know anything about how ESPN's business operates, but I am incredibly skeptical of companies that push hard to find people passionate about whatever the company is doing. All too often that equates with working people longer hours for lower pay, preying on their love for the subject at hand to get them to accept a raw deal. Game dev is I guess the canonical example of this.

I get it, though: an employee who doesn't need an explainer about common things in the sports world is going to get up to speed faster and be more productive than someone who needs some (or a lot of) hand-holding. (And I say this as the guy who'd come up to you and ask, "ummm what's a baseball box score?")

> I think the value of the question is that, all things being equal...

But are things often all equal? I wonder if the universe of "people who love sports and are great developers" is really large enough to fill all the job slots. If you were down to two candidates, and one didn't know much about sports but seemed to be a fantastic developer, and the other was a super sports fan and seemed like they'd get the job done, but maybe not with much excellence, who would you hire? Obviously that's a contrived situation, but hopefully you get the point I'm trying to make.
> If so, then sensory inputs and interaction with the physical through them were absolutely a crucial part of how minds evolved, so I find your approach a priori very unlikely to have a chance at success.

If that was the case, people who were born blind would demonstrate markedly reduced intelligence. I dont think that is the case, but you can correct me if I am wrong. A blind person might take longer to truly 'understand' and 'abstract' something but there is little evidence to believe that capability of abstraction isnt as good as people who can see.

Agree that sensory inputs and interaction were absolutely critical for how the minds evolved, but model training replaces that part when we talk about AI, and not just the evolution.

Evolution made us express emotions when we are hungry for example. But your laptop will also let you know when its battery is out of juice. Human design inspired by evolution can create systems which mimic its behaviour and function.
Title should have (2022) at the end.
> That’s an entirely meaningless and nonsensical statement unless you have some rigorous way to quantify quality.

We have a qualitative measure of quantity, that was where the discussion started - size in bytes.

Storage size in bytes on a pocket iDevice seems to be growing exponentially. Brooks said it stopped doubling and I don't think that is true. iDevices are still doubling their storage size every 2-4 years or so and have been for a while. There was a one-time change to SSDs where they lost a few generations and they are only up to 1TB instead of 160TB (suggesting SSDs are around 7 generations behind HDD which seems reasonable on the face of it to me). But apart from that it has been a pretty steady doubling every few years.

His claim was that iPods didn't get to 160TB because it "nobody actually needed more than that" and that observation is misunderstanding what happened. Apple switched from HDD to SSD because SSD is a much better fit and put the rate of growth back by a few generations but the growth is still ongoing and probably will reach 100s of TB sooner or later.

He was right that iPods didn't need >a few gig of storage ... but that just meant Apple discontinued the iPod brand and replaced it with iPhones, where there is no usage barrier to consuming terabytes of storage. They were obsoleted by the very trend he claimed was over! It appears Apple thinks people did need more, because they aren't making iPods any more.
Anarchy might be fine for you, but it isn't for most. Hell, many people can barely tolerate a regular protest, let alone a multi week aggressively disruptive one occupying a public space.
FYI, Spirit was originally part of Boeing. They're walking back a strategy of outsourcing that is said to be one of the causes of their recent QC problems.
In the text is stated’ All code used to create Newswire is available at our public Github repository. ’ But a check learned “(This repository is empty.” So not yet open science..
> People went from spending the cash in their pocket to cash in their bank account

No they didn't. In the olden days, you would get your paycheque, cash the whole thing, and then spend that money until next paycheque. That's no different to having your pay go directly to your account, and then spending directly out of your account by card.
And they wonder why so many people are sleeping on the streets these days. It’s just better UX.
For Northern Europe there’s also hydro power. Norway is basically all hydro power plants and is well connected to its neighbours.

And there’s trash burning power (with district heating). Norway, Sweden and Denmark has a few of those. Possibly others in the region as well.
.7z recently got native support.
This obsession with hyper optimization at every level is wasteful and unhealthy. I prefer to hire a mix of good enough people, it's a less conflictual team environment. At the end of the day if they are professional, they will get the job done.
As both a developer and an avid market watcher, I set out to create a tool that could give traders and investors a clear, real-time view of the market. The result? A full-stack Stock Market Dashboard that brings critical market data to life. Here’s how I built it, with the help of an AI assistant, Claude 3.5 Sonnet.
The twitter integration did not survive their api changes and price hikes. I removed the block in the editor a while ago. Did I miss a link in the docs?
Can a law make social media less 'addictive'?
For now. And American oversupply stabilizes other regions of the earth.the arab spring rebellion started of as a protest against rising bread prices.The bread prices rose due to American food aid being redirected to biofuels. Good intentions do not transfer to good politics. If change is necessary make it gradually so the world can adapt to it.
Yes, you can reorder the individual segments. If the original video has chapters, these get imported as segments or you can mark them up manually.
> promoting new models of the Bold while their warehouses were full of the Z10

Not familiar with BB lineage I checked the Wiki for the release dates and ... wow.

Not quite an offtopic: people bash me when I point out what Burning Platform is the result of the previous Nokia shenanigans, so blaming it all on Elop is like blaming the fire for charring your steak you forgot on the BBQ.
As a Brit, who now lives in the EU, I would agree with this. Bear in mind that London and the rest of Britain are very different places.
The thing about yachts is, they go on water, and there's a lot of that on this planet. More water than land.
You’re confusing a general question about a chosen occupation with a specific question about a prospective employer.