skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah, I totally agree. Those other factors are internal optimizations. What gets me is when a team wants to switch horses to new tech and do a forklift upgrade just to implement something using the new hotness.
AWS has been there for over 2 decades and is stable, large companies of all sorts use AWS, so it is a safe bet.
Does this editor have a way to display the ASCII bytes in CP437 glyphs? I grew up reading binary files in DOS that way and I can read the glyphs much faster than the corresponding hex values; in contrast, using dots for the non-printable characters doesn't really tell me much.
The economics of writing technical books
Unattended File for Win11 Installation
I judge people by actions not by stated claims. For instance, I don’t consider the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea to be democratic or a republic.
As someone who got started with web dev by sending HTML over HTTP I marvel about the ways modern web devs contort themselves to be able to send json instead.
That's not the fault of the poor cup, it simply means flour should be measured by weight instead
Yes, it's not literally illegal, otherwise Microsoft would be in even more trouble. I just thought it was amusing.

(but also, carrying sensibly sized knife is illegal where I live)
ipfs.ai
I have the same feeling, Vercel is destroying React.
ReSharper is written in C#, not Java.
see for yourself

https://github.com/golang/go/commits/master/src/crypto
I’m not you, so I can believe it doesn’t work for you, but I don’t have trouble with ditching carbs, probably because I’m almost never a sugar monster. Just not my thing. Lucky for me, sucks for you. Appetite is complex and while I’m not one of those people who can eat junk ravenously and be thin, I don’t have that to deal with. Best wishes.
I always knew my dad was a good dad but only once I had a kid did I really understand how much he had quietly and willing given up because he loved me. More and more each day I understand him better and continue gaining an appreciation for all that he has done for me. All of this thanks to my daughter making me / giving me the chance to see life from the other side.
If you have a single routes source that makes it just as easy, although that really depends on the people making sensible route handlers for the routes to point to, if people are not good at doing that obviously the implicit order of /pages is superior.
Scrolling through the article the pictures look no more realistic as it goes on.

You need to simulate poor lighting, dirt, soul, realistic beauty etc. Perhaps even situations that give a reason for a photo to be taken other than I’m a basic heteronormative woman who is attractive.
I'd say the most difficult are convincing someone of something (persuasion) and giving feedback.

Persuasion is maybe the most difficult outcome to achieve. Giving feedback is the most emotionally challenging and nuanced for both parties. And of course giving feedback is often attempting persuasion too.

Occasionally, just listening and not trying to inject your own intents is hardest.
https://github.com/memstechtips/UnattendedWinstall for text instruction.
This is some latest research on this topic: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10363705/
Math >> comprehension.

0.0001% is one in a million. Or within top 7000 rank out of 7 billion humans globally. Or about 0.001% or one in a 100k out of the 700-1000 million in 20-30 age group.

There are about 70000 pro athletes in the world. So only 1 in a 10000 or 0.01% to be a pro athlete when you are in the age group.

Takes less than a year of recreational devotion for a smart healthy person to get into top 1% globally. getting into 0.01% is obviously more competitive and requires you to give up other things.
I'm thinking the lack of decisions, the extreme slowness and backlogs this will cause, isn't an unforeseen consequence, but rather part of what's desired.
If SEO is not important there is nothing wrong with this approach.
VSCode can also be used more or less effectively though. There are quite a few shortcuts & tricks that can make you 10x more productive, even if maybe it's not as much as vim.
I think it's 15, the previous generation from the 16 one. I don't remember exactly, though.
clearly, the solution is to have three smaller desktop dishwashers then
>Ontologically, copyright doesn't exist. Copyright is an epistemology.

You keep using these words, ontology and epistemology. I don't think they mean what you think they mean.

>If copyright could exist, then a copyright for the copyright must be able to exist, and it'd be turtles all the way down

This doesn't make any sense.

First, not all things that exist are covered by copyright or have a copyright about them existing (air exists, but doesn't have a copyright. Neither do slugs, pebbles, Uranus, and other existing things).

Copyright is just sets of laws dictating ability to copy, distribute, and so on. It doesn't need a copyright for itself, and even if it did, the regular terms for reproducing any other legal code would suffice.

>Copyright, as intellectual property, is entirely made up as all other intellectual property is.

All human laws and conventions are made up. Doesn't mean anything - copyright is still enforceable with very real prison buildings, cells, and bars - and if resisting arrest for it, very tangible police battons, tasers, and bullets are not out of question either.
If you think that Go is a better choice than C#, you probably spend too much time watching tech influencers on youtube and twitch and too little time programming and getting familiar with the technologies they spread FUD about.

Go is inferior to C# in every possible dimension: performance, package management, terseness and expressiveness - Go brings notoriously more boilerplate, Go has poorer ecosystem for writing web applications, worse ORMs and worse tools for troubleshooting advanced issues in production - the list goes on.

There are companies that do C# disservice, but you're going to hate to see what they will do with Go instead.
Yes, however, for the purposes of a demo article like this, it's significantly easier to use famous people who are essentially baked into the model. You encapsulate all of their specific details in a keyword that's easily reusable across a variety of prompts.

By contrast, a "normal" random person is very easy to generate, but very difficult to keep consistent across scenes.
Use SDXL instead of sd1.5. Also don't do negative prompting on "distorted, ugly" because everyone follows these guides blindly and the result is the same types of mode collapsed faces which people have learned to recognize as AI. Use loras instead (to make it look slightly amateurish, or just away from the cookie cutter AI style which everyone notices).
Nothing happened?

Tell that to Swedish writer Håkan Nesser who was sentenced to 1,5 years in prison because of tax evasion that was revealed through the Panama papers.

I’m not claiming everyone involved got busted, but at least for some it had real consequences.

https://www.svt.se/kultur/forfattaren-hakan-nesser-doms-till...
Use whatever allows you to get the products completed most quickly. Optimize later.
I find all those photos generated by Stable Diffusion to be kind of repetitious and boring.

Eking out something "interesting" is difficult, especially with limited time and low-end hardware. Interesting is highly subjective of course. I tend towards the more artistic / surrealist style, usually NSFW. Only nudes, no pornography.

I've been experimenting these last few months with interesting generating images, trying to make them "artistic" rather than photo-realistic, or the usual bland anime tributes.

I usually pick a "classical" artist which already has nudes in their repertoire, and try to blend their style with some photos I take myself, and with the style of other artists.

Most fall flat, some come close to what I consider acceptable, but still have major flaws. However, due to my time and hardware constraints they're good enough to post. I use fooocus which is kind of limiting, but after trying and failing to produce satisfactory results with Automatic, fooocus is just what I needed.

I can't really understand why more people don't do the same. Stable Diffusion was trained on a long and diverse list of artists, but most people seem to disregard that and focus only on anime or realistic photographs. The internet is inundated with those. I'm following some people on Mastodon who post more interesting stuff, but they usually tend to be all same-ish. I try to produce more diverse stuff, but most of the time it feels like going against the grain.

The women still tend to look like unrealistic supermodels. Sometimes this is what I want. Sometimes not, and it takes many tweaks to make them normal women, and usually I can't spare the time. Which is unfortunate.

If anyone's interested, I post the somewhat better experiments in:

https://mastodon.social/@TheNudeSurrealist

Warning: Most are NSFW. But are NSFW in the way Titian's Venus, say, is NSFW.
It’ll be really cool to use entire books as prompts to generate visual representations of the characters in them.
Does GPL does this already? Doesn't it already say that code derived from GPL code should be GPLed? So does that include any code produced by an LLM based on GPL code ?
5 WordPress Plugins Compromised; Millions of Websites at Risk
Do people use Next.js as an API server too? In all the projects I've joined, we've only used Next.js as a static frontend framework and dev tool built on top of React. We never touched the SSR feature, just used it as a static site generator, and didn't bother implementing any APIs in Next.js. I can't imagine someone can implement a robust code base while mixing frontend and backend code in that messy folder structure.
I think aiming for clean is good, but it’s really hard to pin down what clean means when you’re starting out.

I feel like just emulating what you see in your first few jobs is ideal. (As in, ask coworkers who know the thing you’re working on) It could be great code to be inspired from, or mediocre. Either way you get some input about what decisions result in what outcomes, and what the outcome “feels” like.

And if it comes time to change one or many of those decisions later on in this codebase, the person doing it gets a uniform codebase to work from! Unique abstractions and fixes in random places makes refactoring harder.
That's a lot of complexity to bring in just to avoid adding a <suspense> tag
No scientific reason, no.
Plan to connect LA to Bay Area by bullet train gets full environmental approval
Much alike a recovering alcoholic, it's easier just not to go into a bar.

I do exactly the same thing by not having a phone. I know I would be that guy always looking at it instead of engaging with the real world. So I just don't have one. It's better that way.
I use it to generate art when building new characters in the Pathfinder group I'm in. In the past, I'd build a backstory for a character, but it would still take a while for them to become more well-defined and for me to have a clear image of them in my mind.

With AI image generation, I can start with the broad brush strokes for the character and then use AI to generate an image based on those prompts which can then help me further define the character to the point that it already feels fleshed out and real before I have even started the game.

I'm pretty pleased with what Copilot (using DALLE-3) spit out for my newest character, a Gothic-themed forensic medical investigator: https://imgur.com/a/bXHeqAX
'Night vision lenses' – power to see in the dark using simple eyeglasses
Appeals court seems lost on how Internet Archive harms publishers
> Spending time sharpening the axe is almost always worth it

I hear this advice constantly. But I feel like it really need to be qualified. I have been in projects that never saw any real value produced because people constantly focused on DX, projects management, and other tools.

Sometimes one just needs to do with tools at hand, and not worry if there are better tools.
Unfortunately, often the same people who are opposed to things like what you said “absurdly wealthy against everyone else”; also inadvertently support them and make them absurdly wealthy through things like the various schemes and contracts related to pandemics, climate change, bailouts, welfare/social services, healthcare, immigration, war, etc.

If people wanted to solve this problem, we would need to make all of the things that benefit the wealthy financially but cost the rest of the people immensely, directly payable through direct taxes on income and wealthy of those most responsible and able to affect those matters, i.e., the upper neo-aristocracy.

For example; all the people who benefited most from all the pollution, should now not also be able to profit from the prescribed solutions to the consequences of their actions that just happen to also make them even more absurdly wealthy.

Even more unfortunate though is that many, if not most regular people simply do not understand the abusive relationship they are in with the upper class, so they’ll rationalize and excuse and justify all day long until the cows come home when someone wants to explain to them that being beaten, lied to, and exploited by the upper class is not a sign of love.
> people who value their retinas when working at 3 AM.

You just need a well lit room to use light mode.
The medical industrial complex clearly thinks it is, otherwise there would drastically lower patient loads, allow more spots for medical school, and provide better working conditions that would allow for fewer mistakes. None of this is happening and is an implicit acceptance of medical error deaths
What about: buy Bitcoin?
I concur. I recently dug up my old diary from my late teens and while it was fascinating it was also kinda horrifying. The things I cared about were, well, kinda dumb. My thought process was sloppy at best. I can see the kernel of person I am, but it is still a very weird experience.
> 0¹²⁰10000111

for those of you(like me) wondering where this apparently spooky constant is coming from, it is a bitstring of the coefficients of the lexically first irreducible polynomial of degree b with the minimum possible number of non-zero terms, where b is the block size(in bits) of the underlying block cipher with which CMAC is instantiated. So, nothing up the sleeve here.
Scroll down to see the comments from people claiming “literally nothing happened” from the Panama papers, which they see this headline as confirming. As I write this, that thread is the 2nd comment thread from the top. It’s a very popular sentiment, despite being wrong.
I think this is a pretty naive take to have here because it assumes that you cannot have two or more things/events/people with the same name but completely different details and history within the context of computer science while being useful.

I feel pretty confident in assuring you that FOCAL https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FOCAL_(programming_language), which first appeared 56 years ago is ever going to have to compete with this app in the language space. In fact as the link to the Wikipedia clairifies, there are other things named FOCAL other than the “Formulating On-line Calculations in Algebraic Language” programming language.

If this was another programming language and it didn’t explicitly callout its namesake I think I’d probably side with you here, but this isn’t a programming language and you implying that someone isn’t respecting the classics here is misguided at best. For example, If someone created an application called Java that helped you brew the perfect cup of coffee or maybe plan a trip to the island of Java, that certainly would not be something that is “not respecting the classics” and “overwriting computer history” for Java the programming language.

In general I agree we should strive to preserve history, especially in such a young field. However criticizing an application developer over their name choice where there is no actual conflict with the things that share its name is pedantry.
Copyright law is more of an ideal, and if it had "never been the case", there wouldn't have been any content to DMCA off of YouTube in the first place. US copyright law is fighting the tide, not conveying a natural order.
The app I maintain is a complex analysis tool that lets you build queries, explore data and create aggregate visualizations. The state doesn't even fit into URL, and connecting it to a DB... No thanks, that's be much harder and slower.
>Everyone's struggle with addiction is different

Not that different, since people still share billions of years of evolutionary mechanisms, and thousands of years of social conditioning.

At best there are a few different kinds of struggle with addiction.
Rider has the shared "IDE" part with IntelliJ and others, written in Java, but the back-end and numerous other components are written in C#.
Text for Proofing Fonts (2020)
Join us on the Vue side! Using Vue and Nuxt (if you need SSR) has been an absolute joy to work with in my experience
>Switch to nuts

Nut are crazily high in calories though. Walnuts are 650 calories per 100 grams (and 100 grams are not that difficult to eat!).

100 grams of steak are like 270 calories for comparison (less than half!).
As a person who got back into web dev and tried Next for the first time, I was pretty upset once I learned that I was using this half baked App router rather than the more straightforward page router.

Their FAQ literally asks if their are any open source applications built on app router:
https://nextjs.org/docs/app#are-there-any-comprehensive-open...
At this feeble level of efficiency we’re probably better off using the energy to split water into hydrogen or producing ammonia.

It’s a trade-off ultimately, either we get to use currently deployed ICE systems and feed them with this solar fuel, or deploy new engines to leverage hydrogen or ammonia based vehicles.

Most probably better to bet on electricity storage tech catching up and just switch everything to full electric.
I think there's something physical about engaging in work with your hands, even if it is just typing the keyboard. The brain seems to like it when its motor cortex is engaged and it feels good. That's why stress toys and worry beads work.
Sometimes noise turns out to be signal (see developments leading to Cosmic Microwave Background [0]). At this stage in gravitational wave detection is it well founded to consider noise as noise instead of information we cannot yet understand?

0. https://discovery.princeton.edu/2015/11/19/cosmic-background...
Yes, the German Green Party has many pro-wind people who nonetheless oppose wind when it’s in their backyard. Germany’s transition from nuclear to coal under their influence is well known. Tragic that they have any power at all. But it won’t last.
Doesn’t matter. If a real war starts you want a lot of men and the only reliable way is conscription. No one could have fought WW2 with a volunteer military. Ukraine aren’t relying on volunteers. Israel don’t rely on volunteers. You do the best you can with what you’ve got available.
And move boats from one ocean to another
The email sent to plugin authors:

"As a follow-up on the Andrew Wilder (NerdPress) and Chloe Chamberland (WordFence) reports that uncovered a limited number of compromised plugins, the Plugin Review team would like to provide more details about the case.

We identified that some plugin authors were reusing passwords exposed in data breaches elsewhere. The compromised accounts were not the result of an exploit on WordPress.org. Instead, the attackers used recycled passwords to add malicious code to a few plugins on the WordPress.org Plugin Directory.

First, out of an abundance of caution, additional plugin releases have been paused, and all new plugin commits temporarily need approval by the team. This way, we have the opportunity to confirm that the attackers cannot add malicious code to more plugins.

We have begun to force reset passwords for all plugin authors and some other users whose information was found by security researchers in data breaches. This will affect some users' ability to interact with WordPress.org or perform commits until their password is reset.

** Information about password deactivations **

Your password was deactivated if you are a plugin author or committer. If you have an existing open session on WordPress.org, you will be logged out and need to reset your password."

In other words, wordpress.org does not scan for malicious code.
They got promoted to senior+ and run the show. “Greybeards go home, the future is now”?
This comparison is unreasonably disproportional.
Does your app have to run in the foreground on the iPad during the flight? Or can the crew user other apps in flight?
Just use remix. It’s so much easier and less painful.
I'm sorry but I'm not sure how this relates to what I wrote. You write "unless tests show" when I already mentioned having a prescription based on blood tests, that taking supplements unnecessarily does no harm (so if you have a similar lifestyle/situation to those who were tested and are known to need it, you might as well right?), and that sunlight generates a second beneficial chemical and so one really should just be going outside when my comment explained there is simply not enough sunlight hitting the skin during the cold months to generate much of anything. I'm genuinely confused how this advice is suppose to be used
I use a GCM and one thing I've noticed about fruits in general is that the glucose spike is short. Things level off on the graph fairly quickly with berries. Although there are some fruits that do cause a significant spike. Fruits like grapes, pineapple and bananas are the worst ones.
>Issued this week by CISA, in conjunction with the FBI, the Australian Signals Directorate’s Australian Cyber Security Center, and the Canadian Cyber Security Center, the report backs a drive by Five Eyes nations to get public and private sector organizations to reduce the number of software vulnerabilities arising from memory safety bugs.

This is not exactly a trustworthy group, given what we know from Snowden revelations. Makes me wonder what their real motives are.
This is an interesting redefinition of the words "power grab". I'm not sure if this is like a mental issue people are having where truth is just become entirely subjective and so they can twist anything to mean anything they want or if this is intentional propaganda to mislead people.

The power grab that was done was with Congress abdicating their power into unelected bureaucracies to create and enforce rules with the force of law. What the supreme Court is saying is that Congress cannot abdicate their power into an unelected bureaucracy. Congress can pass laws and the president can have people enforce those laws but those laws cannot be so broad as to say this unelected enforcement agency can literally write new laws in the form of regulations and then enforce them as if they were law without any kind of recourse. That is a fundamental violation of due process to say some agency was empowered with such broad authority and such broad scope that they can literally write any rule that they want and you must follow it.

To limit the agencies to actually enforcing the law that Congress passed and requiring that those laws be specific enough that they are not open to broad interpretation and redefinition is the opposite of a power grab. It is the limitation of unelected bureaucrats in their power. If Congress wishes to re-empower them they simply need to pass the laws. Those experts, as they claim in the article, have within their power to suggest new legislation for things they want to implement. Having them just be able to arbitrarily make any new rule that they want under a broad umbrella of you are empowered to protect the environment is akin to a dictatorship.