skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I misinterpreted your saying Congress uses specific verbiage to mean that wording is sufficient to avoid ambiguity. You keep repeating the same thing but not really addressing the core point.

I fully acknowledge the difference in opinion here. One side thinks the court has the duty to clear up ambiguity. The other thinks that better resides in the agencies. It’s literally the difference between the ruling and dissenting opinions of the court decision.

My claim is that in a modern society, clearing up that ambiguity requires domain expertise. Just hand waving it away and saying “this is the way it’s always been” (even though that’s not true since that wasn’t the case for the last 40 years) doesn’t actually address that point. So in your opinion, do the complexities of modern society not matter? If not, you’re implying we can bring back a Justice from the 1790s and they can effectively rule on issues related to climate change, the internet, genetics, pharmaceuticals etc. After all, they don’t need any domain knowledge. I disagree; I’ve steelmanned your argument elsewhere in this thread and still find it lacking. The point isn’t “to do things like they were always done before” but the “create a more perfect Union.” I think allowing domain experts to clarify complex issues, within the confines set by the court, is a better system and you haven’t done anything to explain why it isn’t. It comes across as much more about ideology than effective governance.
All these things just remind me how depressing it is that we all use this deeply flawed tool, git, and no one can get enough critical mass for a substantially better version.
My understanding of CSS Module are that they work within a given front end solution but if you embed a "widget" into another website (as the OP is doing) that they provide no benefit. Happy to be corrected though.
I've anecdotally heard of iron supplementation working for some women.

However, if I remember right, even for the seemingly clear case of dark skinned people vitamin D supplementation basically has no evidence. But I'd be happy to see any randomised controlled study (or similar) that says otherwise!

There's plenty of observational studies that people with lower than average vitamin D also have various other health problems. But I don't know of any study that shows that vitamin D deficiency helps eg dark skinned people (or any group at all).
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/the-mystery-of-shellshock...
The main Android vendor Samsung now supports 7 years.

https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/samsung-extends-android-and...
Of course. The simple fact that it is a news that the DOJ is involved, 3 years later, shows how little we expect.

Least we say “The DOJ launches criminal charges”. Nonono. The DOJ is “readying” criminal charges.

The DOJ wrote something ON A PAPER, peons!
Also, what is the "responsibility" of a C-level, if not for faults like this? I thought that was the argument for getting 7+ figures.
I agree completely, not mystical at all.

It is just meta self-awareness.

We evolved to be aware, model & react and to opportunistically control our environment. Loop 1.

Then we evolved to be aware, model, & & react and to opportunistically control our selves as bodies. Loop 2.

Then we evolved to be aware, model, & & react and to opportunistically control those activities too, our minds. In the process of being able to model & react to ourselves modelling & reacting to ourselves we completed a self-awareness of self-awareness loop. Loop 3.

I think this is a good explanation because what else is consciousness but knowing you are conscious? Self-aware that you are self-aware?

And it makes perfect sense as an evolutionary trajectory using greater levels of neural representation of our practical relationship with our environment, including ourselves, to create higher level survival options.

So this definition is both a functional and developmental explanation of the emergent phenomenon of consciousness.

Just as we only have partial access to information and control of our environment, our bodies, we are also limited to the degree we are aware and can control our mind. Introspection.

The next level up is “theory of mind”, “empathy”, etc. our ability to model & interact with others mind’s as individuals and groups, reciprocally. Loop 4. That created society and culture, living information that extends outside us and grows and lives beyond each of us.

Infusing our thoughts, and progressively thinking abilities into technology, that in theory and not too distant practice could have access to all parts of their own minds’ states, operations and design, would be Loop 5. When deeply conscious beings start, things will get interesting in the Sol system.

When people start talking about quantum waves or smart rocks or universes in the context of consciousness I feel a little ill. People like to “solve” unrelated mysteries by merging them and shouting “tada!” (“We are puzzled about how they built the pyramids… but we don’t know if there are aliens either, so obviously… these mysteries solve each other!”)
> babe we gonna fly towards the setting sun

> k
Ah, yes, 40 years ago, wasn't that about the time the Jackpot started? I've heard rumors we are right in the middle of it now.
Love that novel so much and I was there when it hit the shelves, 40-years ago!
Thanks for sharing. Be well.
I’m just trying to understand how AI is crucial to this area.
> I don't think I'll ever be able to convince anybody at my company about this though lol

especially if the company uses 100% code coverage as a metric for success
Nuke blows AE out of the water but is mainly only used by professionals
There's been some research from my alma mater that it might have had water even that early [1]. I haven't seen good data on the estimated temperature during this time (it was hot certainly, the question would be how frequently were there pockets where hyperthermophiles would be able survive). I like this paper's approach [2] - they end up with a small chance of life before the impact.

[1] https://archive.is/NZwpJ

[2] https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/ast.2005.5.154
> These days most common use case of ssh is logging in to a remote server you already own with root privileges

I only see this in relatively small and "young" teams. In any bigger organization I've worked in, a new user is created for each person who uses the machine.
> Ehsan Shan, though not party to the desecration, was accused of reposting the defaced pages of the Quran on his TikTok account, his lawyer Khurram Shahzad told The Associated Press Monday

This guy just shared a video of people engaging in a hate crime.

Reminds me of China banning sad videos of the elderly, or videos of the poor. Remember, the internet is for cat videos, not feeling sad. Hope this guy is able to escape this verdict.
Where Airlines Are Most Likely to Lose Your Luggage
Let's talk "should" and "is".

Should: Society should respect those with different beliefs. Religions should spread by converting their opponents, not by killing them.

Is: He lives in a country that executes people for blasphemy. Regardless of any "shoulds", that is the reality of the country he lives in.

There's a place for saying, on the one hand, that his country shouldn't be like that, and on the other hand, that there's a place for being wise about the environment you live in.
I cannot find any reference to sus project, care to link some?
All kinds of thinking are dangerous.

If you want a lack of thought danger, I'm afraid you'd need a world filled with people who don't think at all.

Consider, your kind of thinking is dangerous...

to someone. (Probably millions of someones.)

So is my kind of thinking.

So is everyone else' kind of thinking.
That sounds right. I guess then "pattern matching" as in Elixir et al. is really just one-sided unification. Which makes me wonder- why don't those languages go all the way?

At a guess, that's something to do with the difficulty to implement unification efficiently. The first description of Unification, by J. Alan Robinson (who first described Resolution) had exponential time complexity and it took a while to find efficient unification algorithms. Perhaps the designers of functional languages simply don't need the hassle and can make do with something more efficient, less complete. That would make good, practical sense in languages that do not use Resolution as an interpreter- it's Resolution that absolutely needs unification (there's ground Resolution, without the need for unification, but it's restricted to propositional terms without first-order variables).
Saying you use it publicly doesn't defeat the security it gives though. Unless you publicly say the port knocking sequence. Which would be crazy.
Are you sure? The text implies that the unsafe path is getting interrupted while parsing a DSA key, which presumably occurs before authentication?
Might as well rent a small plane.
Compilers don't prove UB; they assume absence of UB.

That, plus a modicum of reasoning like "if this were to be evaluated, it would be UB" (therefore, let's assume that is not evaluated).
> Closed loop (off-river) pumped hydro storage has the smallest carbon emissions per unit of storage of all candidates for large-scale energy storage

Pumped-storage is a rather special approach as it feels almost like an extension of the natural water cycle.

Reducing the total footprint of the energy system (including all materials required for construction and ongoing maintenance) is an important part of the sustainability puzzle.

Ofcourse once you scale things to the gargantuan energy needs of modern civilization all sorts of minor "side-effects" may become important.
You're saying that the LLM is a poor pupil, because it failed to surpass (or even equal) human writing?
I did it intentionally. The video had my voice, but then I decided to replace it with an AI voice.
It's a doorstop, not a fix. Useful nonetheless.
Hadn't even thought about that. Now I can't unsee it. Thanks for the suggestion.
If this paragraph made you giggle, give "Feed" by MT Anderson a read.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feed_(Anderson_novel)
Its terrifying; sometimes when I am crossing the street people accelerate, sometimes they slow down, sometimes they stop at red lights, sometimes they drive through them.
Not really a universal index, but interesting nevertheless: MIT Treepedia has indexed some cities based on tree canopies from Google street view.

Some (to me) surprising finds, like Paris (8.8%) vs NY (13.5%).

https://senseable.mit.edu/treepedia
In chrome you can turn off the network per tab.
Port knocking is a ludicrous security measure compared to the combination of:
* configuring sshd to only listen over a Wireguard tunnel under your control ( or letting something like Tailscale set up the tunnel for you)
* switching to ssh certificate authn instead of passwords or keys
Have bumped into this myself recently and we ended up prefixing all CSS classes and ids with a value (i.e. "xyz_"). We leverage Tailwind and our build tooling for this. This has proven somewhat successful but often need to review every site our widget is placed on for edge cases. But at this point we are close to abandoning this approach.

We plan to re-assess using iframes. Which we originally steered clear from due to their rather "dated" feel as a technology.
If you are advertising it as an after effects alternative (which it looks like you are) then you should be trying to include all features that after effects has.
We're using different defintions of copy, and that's not an interesting discussion.

For the rest, we're having different conversations. I'm not concerned with the law as much as I'm concerned about what's good for society in this case.
> I don't use port-knocking but I really just don't get all those saying: "It's security theater".

It's not security theater but it's kind of outdated. Single Packet Authentication[0] is a significant improvement.

> How many exploits rendered cold dead in their tracks by port-knocking shall we need before people stop saying port-knocking is security theater?

Port knocking is one layer, but it shouldn't be the only one, or even a heavily relied upon one. Plenty of people might be in a position to see the sequence of ports you knock, for example.

Personally, I think if more people bothered to learn tools like SELinux instead of disabling it due to laziness or fear, that is what would stop most exploits dead. Containers are the middleground everyone attached to instead, though.

[0] https://www.cipherdyne.org/fwknop/docs/SPA.html
Any other advices you can give to person that is interested in doing same thing?
That "sound" is partially due to the design of the current AM system. It was built to pack more transmitters into the allocated frequency range.

There are no technical impediments to high fidelity audio because of amplitude modulation. In the past the big limitation was the bandwidth of intermediate frequency (IF) amplifiers in the receivers which were typically tuned for maximum gain and not flat audio band response. The transmitters have flat response out to the legal limits. Radio stations have a monitor receiver that has proper IF audio response and the sound of those are very good.
What about a simple dark mode, that even the OS provides options for?
> Without Analytics, I'm blind: I can't tell which feature are popular and which aren't. I need those infos to undertand where I should focus, what are users the more interested in.

I have a suggestion which has always served me well: Ask. Or don’t even ask, users will tell you what they want anyway. Analytics will only give you skewed information, as you are unable to distinguish the popularity of a feature is due to its usefulness, its prominence, or a general lack of clarity.
I always wanted to read Neuromancer. But then came the WWW, and finally smartphones, and I stopped reading novels.

Suffice it to say, I would have enjoyed it if I had read it.
You have clearly misunderstood the concept. It's not reality denial in that case, it's a call to try things. Just sitting around all doom and gloom will create exactly zero new science and technology. You have to try shit, even if the odds are bad.
I have a script that looks at your github org/team and generates/updates users on-demand then lets you connect.

The script is pretty straightforward, see AuthorizedKeysCommand and https://github.com/{$user}.keys
From your snippet I was wondering whether he was butchering the concept that pessimism is suffering twice (both in anticipation and when your pessimism is confirmed) whereas optimism is only suffering once.

But the context of Elon's tweet actually makes more sense than I was expecting from a tweet from Elon. If everyone's pessimistic about the future and doesn't even try then we'll never accomplish anything.

There's nuance to this topic - we shouldn't strip it out.
I like: reduce, re-use, repair, recycle.

I agree with fixing older stuff. I buy used frequently. Estate sales are my lifeblood. If you can't fix it you don't own it.
As I understood the point was not that they fine tuned a model and it got better

They use a much simpler model, fine tune it, and manage to beat a way more advanced model
> Weak government oversight is going to make every aspect of your life worse. It's going to poison the air you breathe, the water you drink and the food you eat. It's going to make cars less safe. It's going to make air travel less safe.

There's another side to this coin though. The US already has a huge list of government regulations and people paid to do nothing but regulate industry. Those industries currently poisonthe air we breathe, the water we drink, and the food we eat. Are we to assume that regulation would work if we only have more than today, or that regulation didn't work despite how much we've thrown into it already?

One approach is to further regulate industry. Another approach is to remove legal protections that prevent corporations and corporate leaders being held legally liable for what they do. And I don't mean liable for fines amounting to fractions of profit and no risk of bankruptcy. Companies should be allowed to fail if they cause damage at such a scale, and leader/employees shown to actively make those decisions should be personally liable.

The challenge with less regulation is really that it moves responsibility back to the consumer, and it sure seems like most people really don't want to take responsibility for many aspect of their daily lives. That sounds horribly cynical, I don't know a better way to phrase it but it is absolutely true. Our bent on blindly trusting those considered experts is a great example of it, as is our blind faith in all modern pharmaceuticals as an alternative to accepting that sometimes our health issues are linked to decisions we make and how we live our lives.
Denis Villeneuve, please make this movie!
I personally love: https://www.carbonads.net

And the sites that use it like: https://blog.codinghorror.com

Single ad per page. Let sites monetize, but 50% ad space is stupid.
It's still worth it today -- it's aged well, is a blast to read, and you'll probably tear through it in a sitting or two if you're anything like me.
Well, it’s rarely “running” on your machine but is just a client for the server it is running on.
New findings may fix the replicability crisis in microbiome research
Or maybe the prices are being pushed down by the chinese government? I remember reading some news about how european governments are upset over this.

In general, I wonder how much do we really know when we talk about cause and effect in economics. We see prices going down. We attribute it to something. But without experiments, how can we be sure?
See my response to bananapub below.
I would assume he refers to "safe" being absolutely safe, while "safest" refers to the safest of the existing alternatives?
> I have a conspiracy, that our economy is so utterly shit that our govt uses such lynchings as a release valve. Hey, inflation biting you? Go kill someone and set them on fire, let that pent up stress out.

It’s not a conspiracy theory. Governments around the world spend money, effort and time to distract people from real issues. One of the easiest ways is to show them “those extremely bad people out there” and start or incite clashes and wars. When there’s another enemy that’s created to be worse for our social values or morals, it’s easy to unite people against that and keep them busy with something else.
My procrastination pays off ...
Why do you think web only is positive?

15 years from now, will this site still be up?

Will you be able to open your projects from today, then?

I think web only is a really compelling way to get someone to try a product, but I’d much rather install a tool like this. Unless you could host the site yourself, of course.
A lot of well-researched deep technical dives I read are from non-commercial hobbyist sites, academic papers/reports, or blogs ran off the back of a company with some product/service to sell (like Raymond Chen's The Old New Thing, or malware investigations from antivirus vendors). Would even say that ad-supported articles commonly link back to one of these as their source.
I only read it for the first time last year... mind blowing. It doesn't feel dated in the slightest. It could have been a new release.
Hang on, https://www.man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/sshd_config.5.html says

> If the value is 0, there is no time limit.

Isn't that worse?
I'm kind of surprised advocating calling any syscall other than signal to add the handler back again. It's been a long time since I looked at example code, but back in the mid 90s, everything I saw (and so informed my habits) just set a flag, listened to the signal again if it was something like SIGUSR1 and then you'd pick up the flag on the next iteration of your main loop. Maybe that's also because I think of a signal like an interrupt, and something you want to get done as soon as possible to not cause any stalls to the main program.

I notice that nowadays signalfd() looks like a much better solution to the signal problem, but I've never tried using it. I think I'll give it a go in my next project.
Most apps don’t need to be on the web. And the ones that need to be can be done with the document model instead of the app model. We added bundles of complexity to an already complex platform (the browser).
rovr beat me to it below. Here are more links: https://jacobsgill.es/phdobtained (fun fact: because my thesis contains published papers, I am in breach of a few journal's copyright by uploading my own thesis pdf, but fuck'em).

LLM approaches were evaluated on my own time and but published (I left research after obtaining my PhD).
IIUC, Tesla is ~40% owned by institutional investors.

I'd think they're immune to the cult-of-personality effect, at least if approaching that stock from a fundamentals perspective.

Is that view outdated, e.g. because of modern trading algorithms?

Caveat: I'm not an educated investor.
Chrome Apps are suffering a slow death by Google.

https://www.theverge.com/2020/1/15/21067907/google-chrome-ap...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Chrome_App

> Support for Chrome Apps in the Chrome Web Store was removed from Chrome in June 2022, except on ChromeOS where support has been extended until at least January 2025.
Does Wireguard work in such a way that there is no trace of its existence to an unauthorized contacting entity?

I used port knocking for a while many years ago, but it was just too fiddly and flaky. I would run the port knocking program, and see the port not open or close.

If I were to use a similar solution today (for whatever reason), I'd probably go for web knocking.

In my case, I didn't see it as a security measure, but just as a way to cut the crap out of sshd logs. Log monitoring and banning does a reasonable job of reducing the crap.
That’s because China is an authoritarian dictatorship that uses forced labor. That’s who you’re pining to be.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Werwolf

(Or, direct link to using google translate to get the gist

https://de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Werwolf?_x_tr... )
> psychopathology, including depression, delusions, and religious mysticism of the sort engendered by psychosis.

> characterized by false beliefs in the sentience of inanimate objects and delusions about the self and others. Reading minds is the lingua franca of mentalistic cognition, and symptoms of psychosis are essentially mind-reading on steroids

What you will not admit to yourself is that your conceptions of "sanity" and "normality" are pleasant lies. Intellectuals (those living from a world within, rather than one mirroring the "out") naturally recoil.

It's not all bad, not yet, until some precipus of conception takes them through doorways of the mind through which they cannot coherently navigate (now a troglodyte in the cavern of shadows).

It is inevitable that these will stumble upon the "greatest secret of our humanity." That we are not alone in our own minds and our conservative thinking otherwise keeps us on rails.

Atrocious behavior only comes by the desperation. All Mankind has it wrong. All Humanity will deny you this Truth. Talk about frustrated flip out time.

PKD and others have the cover of art to conventionalize and glorify their insanity. Obviously, no one really knows what's going on. The craze must come by the decades of slow cook.
.
Winamp comes to mind as a counter example.
I have fixed that

It ought to take you to the jobs section
My Python code is a neural network
It's currently being made into a series by Apple TV+.
Hey! I’m the developer behind OctoEverywhere! I’m sorry about your refund experience. I’m a one man shop for the whole website, so sometimes I fall behind on support tickets. Usually when I do respond I can do the refund right away, so I’m not sure what happened in your case. If you would like to follow up about it, I’m happy to look into it, just open a support ticket or DM me on Discord.
Your dreams of having slaves are so revealing
The telltale words that could identify generative AI text