skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No, the internet was always obviously useful. It's the best communication tool since the written word and people were using it as such from the beginning. Of course not many people had access in the 1980s but those who did (college students) were using it constantly to communicate with people around the country (and soon the world).

AI (in the general sense) is also obviously useful, but the jury's still out on whether LLMs are the way to get there. Right now their best use-case seems to be cannibalizing the search market. It's not clear whether they can fully displace search engines though, given their stubborn propensity for confabulation.
Obsidian is exceptional. You can make a new page just by creating a link to it. The hierarchy is available as fileview, or as graph- view based on links. That’s just the out of the box tooling. Tons more extensions for basically anything you can imagine.
By definition it can't. An ideal resistor is a linear relation between the voltage across it and the current through it.

If you are allowed switches in the network and the input is a fixed voltage then things get interesting.
Due to the way lifetimes work in C (they begin with the block, not the declaration), the following is legal:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stddef.h>

int main()
{
{
int *p = NULL;
if (p)
{
what:
printf("a = %d\n", *p);
return 0;
}
int a = 123;
p = &a;
goto what;
}
}
Ah I see. But does every deployment really require stealth? I could imagine that treatment could be skipped for a while if it's the only thing.
I think you'll love this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4v9A9hQUcBQ
"The stock market is arguably over-regulated as it is, which may be why we now see a large-scale return to private markets;"

Lol I don't think there's a single reputable analyst that agrees with your analysis. Private equity has serious ethical issues with the way many outfits operate. It sounds like you don't have a strong understanding of ethics based on your comments. If you want to just play by low regulation
or natural law, than I might as well just take your stuff. If they can't enforce it (catch me), then I guess it's right for me to do so.
The timer might be much longer than it's fashionable to believe right now, which would make this sort of FOMO investment completely pointless.
There are people that I discovered were vegans when discussing what to eat. And there are people that loudly announced they'd become vegans without any context.

The later group used to be larger, but I don't remember anybody doing that recently.
Computational Life: How Self-Replicating Programs Emerge from Simple Interaction
The question is if their holdings will melt faster than they can develop the capability to use the new AI better than the small fries going after them.

So far this year the main thing slowing down development for us has been the SEC seizing our development boxes for insider trading once a month or so. Which given that each cost $50,000 has been something of a sore point.
Lots more videos here if you enjoy watching the same thing blow up from different angles... which who the fuck doesn't -

https://m.weibo.cn/search?containerid=231522type%3D1%26t%3D1...
I don't think the strychnine was a scientific experiment? As the article says it was in use as a stimulant (including medicinally) at the time.
> The only mechanism besides ionization that could harm humans [is heat]

This claim is, IMO, too strong given available evidence.

There are many chemical interactions with characteristic energies well below 1eV, or any reasonable threshold for "ionizing". Photons can couple with these interactions without ionizing anything. 4GHz range is probably fine, because the per photon energy is a small fraction of a mEv, but even then I would not rule out the possibility of multiple photons coupling to a structure without the imparted energy immediately being dispersed as heat.

Any time you have EM with low entropy/etendue, it is always theoretically possible for interactions to occur outside of the thermal regime.
It’s also not just that! theres no requirement for a business to be involved for it to be an investment (e.g Gov bonds)
In that image, a little bit of the backside of the cap is visible. The dark border at the right bottom.

So as I understand it, the AI would have to figure that out on its own and remove it before it adds the boy to the image?

Also, that image has watermarks all over it. Does that mean the AI has to detect and remove those?

The perspective of the cap is rather unusual for a photo on a human. As it would cover the eyes. Does that mean the eyes of the boy would be covered in the result? Or do you expect the AI to change the perspective of the product photo?
Integrating AI CodeGen with Low Code Web Application Development – Part 2
Swig, right? We had one of those open here and the line was ridiculous for months. Not my jam, but always blocking access to my coffee shop.
This is why I use txt/markdown based notes.

Async collaboration happens with git, synchronous can happen with any text editor that supports collaborative editing.
Can it unpack the dishwasher yet ?

Also why do I see Mark Zuckerberg in the first image ?
The supply wouldn’t even be increasable if SHA256 is cracked
I like it, because it is indeed nice to have a NIST-backed construction.

But at the same time, it is disappointing that you get locked out of several niceties of NIST KDFs, such as label and context. I get that they are sacrificed to minimize the number of AES calls, but still I would prioritize strong cryptographic separation over just a few saved AES calls, especially for messages longer than a few hundred bytes.

Finally, *random* GCM nonces longer than 96 bits are definitely misunderstood and bring better guarantees than 96 bits nonces [1]. But of course, if you can derive a fresh key for every message, that's definitely to prefer.

[1] https://neilmadden.blog/2024/05/23/galois-counter-mode-and-r...
It’s better to just place links to the relevant parts of the Docker official docs if you want to help people using Docker for the first time IMO.

Focus the energy of your own docs on your own product itself, and let the docs of your dependencies cover most of the general steps regarding those.
you can say something like that only with a power of hindsight, knowing what was a useless fad and what was a ReVolUtioNary TecHnOLOgY
For every Netflix there were many Pets.coms and for every Blockbuster there were a lot of Petcos, whose website at the time of the collapse of Pets.com was still just a basic marketing page [0].

It's not that companies shouldn't be wondering if and how LLMs will change their industry, but there's a very real possibility that the answer for the next 20 years is "A bit, but not enough for us to need to drop everything yet. Let's keep watching and see how this pans out."

[0] http://web.archive.org/web/20001109045300/http://www.petco.c...
Because I ended up doing “business” things that are far from low-level, and I sort of like it, never wanted to return to C/asm.
And everyone with any sense said blockchains were stupid tech.

So many people have been following the hype of foolish tech trends that they can no longer differentiate them from actual ground shifting technology.

It's sad what blockchain hype has done to a supposed tech audience. To this day all nobody can describe an actual large impactuf use for blockchains other than get rich quick. Even with the tech there it does nothing for day to day life.

Duplicating portions of human intelligence has tremendous practical use in every facet of society. The tech just needs to get there.

It's pet rocks vs electricity.
It's wonderful. Maybe just the nostalgia and familiarity of yesteryear kicking in, but I really enjoyed it.
This is true in crypto, but not true in Bitcoin
Also on MSN

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/they-re-cashing-in-m...
Hey sorry for the delay didn't see I got a response.

I had no art background at all, and honestly it's one of my biggest weak points that I debate doing more learning around. I got some fundamentals in my classes at Gnomon, but I'm pretty lacking when it comes to things like lighting, composition, etc. None of these matter for my job, but it does impact my personal work.
[1]: isinstance(StopIteration, Exception)

[1]: False
Whilst a shameless plug is clearly beneath you, feel free to put a link to it in your bio!
>Yes. That's called gentrification.

No, not really. Gentrification is not rich people camping on the streets and parks, look it up.

>Well, that of their dogs.

Well, I am talking about human shit specifically but homeless have dogs too. So people are not bothered with rich people's dog shit? In the same universe where gentrification is when rich people camp on the streets and pass out from drugs?

>They get around this by doing blow instead.

You completely lost me. Are you just playing associations and type whatever first comes into your head? Good luck with that.
Internet Archive is claiming their lending program is fair use, and deciding whether something is fair use involves showing the effect (or lack thereof) of the use on the market for the work. A use that doesn't hurt sales is much more likely to be held as fair use.

There are requirements to show harm for other purposes like standing to sue in the first place, but that's not really a relevant issue here. Damages would of course be another, but copyright law has statutory damages that probably easily eclipse any actual harm here, and at any rate the parties already made a (confidential) agreement on damages after Internet Archive lost in the district court.
The difference _is_ between amazon and sears. One was an internet company and thrived, one wasn't and died.

AI will do the same.

That a bunch of companies couldn't figure out how to use the internet is neither here nor there. There were plenty of factories that never figured out how to use electricity. Doesn't mean that steam power is still viable.
When you're doing long-term investments, it's not a zero-sum game. It is possible - likely even - that you and those hordes of PhDs all come out ahead.
This.

There are a few people who might write a book and give it away for free, but if you want professional artists you need to ensure that they can make money by selling copies. In other words, someone like the Internet Archive won't start giving it away for free.

In any case, calling it a "monopoly" is a bit unfair. It's like saying the rape laws give a woman a "monopoly" on her body. No one is stopped from creating their own art, just from plagiarizing others.
Hello there. Want to know how to ACTUALLY use ChatGPT for copywriting? Most of what you read out there isn't written by real practitioners who use AI in their daily grind. I’m here to change that. This guide shows you how to integrate ChatGPT into your workflow for research, data organization, idea generation and (of course) writing.
Vscode can open, edit and commit to any repo from the browser.
Sure but where doe Symbian fit into all that?
But it might want to do that…
I'm also a fan of git+text editor but I do miss the collaborative editing. In the final stage of writing a paper, I want to be able to sit on a video conference call and both people edit the document at the same time, without having to stop to push and pull every little edit.

Unfortunately, it seems that most collaborative editing tools are web or work on a client-server model where only the "server" has the actual files and can compile them to pdf. (The client can collaboratively edit raw latex but can't see the resulting pdf)
Less features also results into worse UX sometimes. There's a point of diminishing returns, and Apple of recent loves to keep crossing over it, by removing useful features such as being able to trigger a FW updates when the user wants to instead of waiting around for it to maybe happen.
Sounds like a problem both caused and solvable by your web browser.

At least with Firefox it is possible to style it dark while setting prefers-color-scheme to light.
It's a well known story, he was doing maintenance:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_oven#Discovery

The thing is, you don't need a lot of extra heat to melt a chocolate bar on your pocket. It's perfectly possible that everybody felt hot when working on an active radar, but didn't discuss it or maybe even notice the correlation.
It sure does beat needing to have someone to do it for you :-)
Then isn't your argument just the standard imaginary property maximalist argument in support of creating a unilateral property right? All of that access/enjoyment/whatever you're talking about can still occur under the complete control of the publisher. Whereas copyright law at least purported to strike a balance between those receiving the artificially-created property rights, and the rest of society having created it for them.

And no I'm not talking about a right of collaboration. "Collaboration" implies the original author is still alive and even participates with some back and forth. I'm talking about the ability to simply use creative works after they're supposed to have become part of the public domain - not still locked behind the non-expiring technical block of digital restrictions management, not unusable due to API churn, etc.
> Also, that image has watermarks all over it. Does that mean the AI has to detect and remove those?

I don’t think that’s what they meant. I think they mean they will use photos of products that they themselves (or the factories they buy it from) provide, without watermarks, and they want to add generated things like people etc into the photo while keeping the product itself the exact same as it was
Ok, fair enough. I must admit I was looking at C99 as I thought that was most generally relevant, I don't follow recent C standards (as much as I do those for C++) and C23 hasn't been ratified yet. I've found your new snippet:

> In particular, all observable behavior (5.1.2.4) appears as specified in this document when it happens before an
operation with undefined behavior in the execution of the program.

I consider that a change in the standard but, of course, that's allowed, especially as it's backwards compatible for well defined programs.

The wording is a little odd: it makes it sound a like you need some undefined behaviour in order to make the operations beforehand work, and, taken very literally, that operations between two undefined behaviours will work (because they're still "before an operation with undefined behavior"). But I suppose the intention is clear.
There's a concept in science fiction called a bioroid, in which android are made of completely or mostly biological components. Think of a human body but almost entirely artificially engineered with biological systems.

I suspect in reality, human bodies may become more machine-like and more biologically engineered rather than just the focus on restoring functionality and health.
We live in different realities then. I can't talk about details for my previous employer, but I can say there is an implementation involving LLMs saving Data Scientists a lot of time right now. I witnessed impact first hand and advised on the implementation and refinement for the group that built it.
>It is possible - likely even - that you and those hordes of PhDs all come out ahead.

No, it isn't. This is total nonsense, if the PhDs believe a stock is undervalued they bid it up until it is even valued.

The only secret strategy an individual has to outperform the market over a long time is insider training. Everything else means you are betting against the market being efficient, which is risky, to say the least.
There is a separate interesting question of whether you could exploit the nonlinearity of a network of non-ideal resistors in practice. Given that tom7 was able to use floating point inaccuracy as a source of nonlinearity for ML, I’m guessing the answer is probably “yes, but now your system is incredibly sensitive to stuff like ambient temperature”.
If you use Ubuntu then just install systemd from the repos and use that imo. Less learning for you to do if you already know how services are configured in Ubuntu.

You’ll need to point the entrypoint to /usr/bin/init.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_composition

The fallacy of composition is an informal fallacy that arises when one infers that something is true of the whole (all forms and manifestations of thinking) from the fact that it is true of some part (your single example) of the whole.

Also: the truth value of your theory is subject to your theory itself.
Than om quite famiar with all this.

I’m not worried about extinction though , I just mea , why build to enslave ? How would you enslave something gore capable than you to recoup the 50 trillion in investments ? I mea. I get
This one's called Straws.
More on Ratcliffe-on-Soar

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/apr/21/end-times-f...
Unless vehicles start to be kind of standard, like most Chinese EVs... Or like Japanese house abacus to speed up anti-seismic computations.

In the end we already have some common base, at least in EU most light commercial vans for instance have a common base even if they are built by many OEMs and have various cosmetic differences. A Transit, Vito, Ducato, Master etc are the same base with different dress, I see no reasons not to do the same for cars.
Missiles of the World – Info on strike capabilities from around the globe
Thank you for taking the time to explain this, a really valuable contribution to this thread. When I consider this going forward, I'll think of it this way.
When you combine that with the fact that you can't invoke the function directly, this seems like the textbook definition to me. Agree to disagree I guess.
Makes sense, i didn't think it was possible to maintain that complicated a codebase with so little changes.
https://www.ultimatepp.org/www$uppweb$vswx$en-us.html
Really ironic thing to say about the Civil War, which was to a great degree a holy war: https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/05/21/how-abraha...

The Republican coalition of religious conservatives and business has its origins in the Civil War, where northern industry joined forces with fundamentalist Christians who opposed slavery. A quarter of all union soldiers were immigrants, mostly poor German immigrants. Iowa sent more volunteers (per capita) to fight for the union than any other state. What motivated all those people to fight and die in a war between British people? They had no personal stake in the war—they didn’t have industry powered by southern resources like cotton, nor were any battles fought anywhere near their homes. For them, fighting for the union was about vindicating a religious opposition to slavery.

It was the confederates that portrayed themselves as being on the side of “science” against religious “zealots.” https://www.battlefields.org/learn/primary-sources/cornersto.... To make sense of that, put yourself in 1861. That was more than a century before we had the technology to determine that humans are genetically all the same. If you were someone who looked at the world—what people had built in Africa and what they had built in Europe—and said “these people are all the same,” that was a statement of faith.
Agreed that if you want to keep the relational part, using the DB to store pointers is probably the easiest, though it might require rethinking search.

I appreciate you at least considering the various options. If you do nothing else, tuning Postgres parameters, optimizing column ordering, and removing duplicated indices will be a great step forward that is completely backwards-compatible.
Another good book is _Blitzed_.

A bit about it:

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/09/books/high-on-hitler-and-...
Some of the "small fry" might get big, but similarly some of the big players will stay big - even pre-AI there have been sizable shifts in AUM.
Nothing free that I know of, get Adobe Firefly
Top Scorpion Species Suitable as Pets
That's helpful. Thanks for the response.

I think a useful caveat on that would be "...when these projects started". Roblox started in 2003 and Factorio in 2012.

As of today embedding v8 doesn't seem that hard (https://v8.dev/docs/embed)
I agree with Razib Khan, who calls organized religion a form of “social technology.”
It’s too hard to prove it’s A) deliberate B) unnecessary.

It’s little things all day.
I think you’re right, I should have separated it in two parts. First is learning low-level “how it works, exactly” — that is useful. Second is writing actual low-level code — that I’d advise myself against.

So, I guess:

- Learn how sockets, filesystems and processes work, read apue, learn how jits/compilers work. But don’t write serious C, that’s a waste of time even if you’re smart enough.
I think the causation runs in the opposite direction. These exceptions for these platforms were implemented in an inefficient fashion BECAUSE they thought that exceptions should almost never be thrown.
I don't see why consciousness is necessary for thinking.

I would define thinking as the ability to evaluate propositions and evidence and arrive at some potentially useful plan or hypothesis.

I see no reason why a machine could not do this, but without any awareness ("consciousness") of itself doing it.

I also see no fundamental obstacle to true machine awareness either, but given your other responses, we can just disagree on that.
If you're willing to put in a little work it's possible, but you're going to have to get your product rendered or photographed at the angle you want it to appear in the photo, then mask the product while having the AI generate the rest of the image.

I've done this with some success using t-shirt mockup templates to get the color, shadows, folds and creases in the clothing right then regenerated everything around the shirt.
I have to say that when I saw the headline I was extremely skeptical. "Fastest possible" is a very, very bold claim.
> any artifact must somehow be embedded in the physical world for us to say that it exists at all.

Religious belief[1] often has no such constraints.

There's also this:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modal_realism

[1] Any metaphysical framework really, including science as it is practiced/experienced, as opposed to the technical scriptures, guidelines, and intentions. For example, see how the Rationalist community has framed the phenomenon:

https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/aspiring-rationalist
Here I am still waiting for all those amazing innovations that the blockchain will bring us.
Confluence is the slowest piece of enterprise software I have ever used besides maybe an XL Jira. “Waiting for Confluence” became a thing at paypal like “my monorepo is downloading all of the dependencies for everything.”

Very long coffee breaks, maybe down the street, for documentation from across town to load. We didn’t attempt to update that documentation, so anything better, is better. I’m barely exaggerating
The most ridiculous thing was that I got the inspiration from star trek.

Added a bunch of "computer take note:" to an existing transcript and it wrote 10 out of 10 notes in a 'notes' section at the end of the minutes.