skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You can also figure out the source direction by when the signal arrives at the different (currently three, on a good day) detectors.
That doesn't really answer my question, but it doesn't sound like it has much to do with my comment.
Huh, I thought at least part of the Atom team went on to work on Zed
There is also just a huge increase in global air travel, which should increase the number of total incidents. The number of commercial flights doubled between 2004 and 2019, and is expected to continue on that trend for some time.
yeah sometimes the notifications can be a bit too quirky for my taste my inbox gets oof but man having Nietzsche and Seneca nagging me is kinds fun Keeps me active
> A huge win for democracy and freedom that both major US parties and all citizens should celebrate.

You've said this elsewhere in thread but you're making an idealogical claim with no supporting information. Congress is virtually non-functional, the court voted on idealogical lines, it only benefits one party to put more responsibility into congress.

So maybe 50% of the country should be celebrating?

I for one see a lot of problems with this ruling and the secondary and tertiary consequences it will cause.
Of course, we regularly have big, major bipartisan bills getting passed in the Congress, don't we?

/s
The fact that you have to go to often heroic measures to keep your bundle size under 500KB even for simple apps doesn't make it irrelevant or useless. It is indeed bloated: on the development boilerplate side, the bundling/deployment side, and the browser runtime experience.

With an experienced and top-notch developer, anything is possible in any language or framework. For the other 95% of devs out there—especially on a team where the lead doesn't keep a strong grip on the reins—React turns to mud awfully fast. But it's mud with an extensive ecosystem and tons of inertia helping it succeed.
And that's better how??
Assuming their (also open source) Relay Proxy[1] can connect to this successfully, the disclaimers about lack of HA might not be too concerning.

We already run a giant pool of relays for our apps to connect to, both to save ingress/egress costs, and to provide a backup if LD blips out for a while.

[Edit: yep, it actually uses the Relay Proxy, in offline mode. See https://github.com/dorklyorg/dorkly/wiki/5.-Architecture]

[1] https://github.com/launchdarkly/ld-relay
That's one take...
pricing people out is a poor attempt at a solution

No, it's a good solution to negative externalities. In the status quo, drivers do not bear the full cost of driving (noise, pollution, opportunity cost of time lost in traffic). Congestion pricing address that by imposting a fee equal to the societal cost of those externalities.
Fentanyl is more complex, now users are more and more looking for it... (source: a friend working in harm reduction)
The legislature are not experts and it is reasonable for them to rely on the experts in the agencies that they created to fine tune implementation. If this was really bad then you should take it up with the legislature to change the laws.

This goes into a core misunderstanding I think a lot of Americans have, that we have three co-equal branches of government. That was not the intention, the Legislature is supposed to be the most powerful, creating laws and with the authority to impeach the other two branches, who have no way of removing legislatures. Over time the other two branches have been accumulating power that should belong to the legislature, and I see this as yet another example.
If you're on PIP, you need to start looking for a different job. The company's perception of you is already too far gone by the time you're officially on PIP.
It depends on which tradition they're talking about. Could it predate the rule of law?
The hope from conservatives seems to be 100%.
Nah, phones don't have that good of screens for reading. They are decent, yes, but not great. That's why I went with phone with e-ink screens, works wonders.
... I just found I can do that with HTMX

https://htmx.org/examples/web-components/

thanks!
It seemed hard at first, until I decided to get up and pan around (looking like a fool).

Imagine you're in a spaceship and pushing down accelerates it.

It was fascinating how quickly this perspective gave me a sense of orientation.
Action items from the retro should be user stories for the next sprint!
By opening the package of salmonella you've agreed to binding arbitration agreement in the venue of their choosing.... Sadly I'm not even that far from serious.
It's another chip away at oversight protections.

The more things like this happen, the more the function of government (and business, and relationship between labor and business) will return to the way they were operated in the US between 1880 and 1920.
So if something that is seen as a bad idea should be kept in place because "that's the way we've always done it"?
I love anvaka's maps! See also reddit: https://anvaka.github.io/map-of-reddit/ and GitHub: https://anvaka.github.io/map-of-github/
I think what would also be important is to select an existing frame and create additional views that fit the existing frame, that would definitely help creating a proper workflow
People probably tell the shops to use it because they don't know anything else and lack fundamental understanding of programming which makes switching frameworks quite hard. I.e. job security for "React programmers".
How is it a win when the US justice system is so incredibly broken? This is a win for rich people and greedy firms who can drown their victims in drawn out legal action by throwing money at them. Jury trials are a zero sum game and are not actually that great at achieving just outcomes. They make sense for individuals, but corporations are NOT people and should not be entitled to the same constitutional rights.
> your car isn’t beating the train

Doesn't it depend on where you live with respect to the nearest station? Doesn't it depend on whether you have a direct train or you need to change a couple of times?
The word "can" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that statement.
They likely have a capacity issue. The same plant that makes Broncos (huge sellers) also make the Mavericks which added a third shift in 2023. Some Ford plants already run three shifts, Kentucky Truck plant did for the longest of times. I think Ford has one entire factory dedicated to F150s. Ford has two weeks a year to add a new model to a factory, car manufacturing is very inelastic.
Show HN: Shared Family Calendar
Hello HN.
I am working on this project in my free time.
Any feedback would be appreciated.
I don't think it's abandonware, per se, so much as that gRPC deliberately stays way behind the times with respect to Java language versions. So that they can support enterprise users who are conservative about Java upgrades. I don't know where the Java implementation is now, but when I was using it ca. 2019, it was still officially targeting Java 7. This was after the end of public updates, but still well within Oracle's paid support period for that version.

Java 7 support is now completely over, so I'm guessing now they're targeting Java 8. This does create an annoyance for Java 9 and later users, and requires annoying workarounds for them. I don't see this as a maintainability problem, so much as a culture clash: gRPC is doing things the Google way; other people don't want to do it the Google way.

All that said, I don't think other people are wrong. This is exactly the kind of thing I was complaining about - a lot of gRPC's potential (at least for my purposes) is undermined by its status as a big complicated enterprisey Google monoculture project.
> it isn't that Apple removed direct access to the hardware in watchos 5 but that they changed the algorithm

Precisely why it should be possible for an app to provide their own algorithm (by accessing sensor information, or opting to re-use Apple's algorithm) but adapted to the app's use case. Apple must be transparent here.

> I don't think every app needs access to every sensor for privacy reasons

We already have a system in iOS to request permission to sensitive data. In fact, we have more than one - App Store Review (supposedly the guardian at the gate) and the permission prompt in the app itself. Privacy is not "degraded" when more sources can be requested by an app.
I don’t understand this take, because the elected officials could have always made any law regulating this stuff regardless of this ruling. The fact they haven’t tells us something.

And this ruling will result in a lot of the common good (limited resources like fish, air quality, etc) being trampled upon and becoming the profit of a couple companies, taking these goods away (sometimes irrevocably such as in the case of over fishing) for the generations of the future.

We need our regulatory bodies to be able to move faster because by the time congress might respond it will be too late.
Long term, I wonder if this destroys the Supreme Court. I see no reason why a future liberal majority would feel bound by any conservative precedent in the future. Replace respect for precedent with whatever position wins a majority and the incentive to pack the court seems irresistible.
This made (very lay-person) me wonder if you could detect quantum wave function events.

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/275556/can-you-d...
That is a feature, not a bug. Supreme Court decisions are informed by precedent, not bound by precedent. If that creates chaos it's not their fault. Blame the legislators who wrote bad or vague laws in the first place. If the laws were sufficiently clear and specific then the Supreme Court wouldn't have much work to do.

And let's not have any ridiculous claims that the Supreme Court needs to legislate from the bench because Congress is dysfunctional. In most of the areas where Congress has failed to pass new or revised laws there are real divisions or lack of consensus in the country. It's more important to preserve our Constitutional separation of powers even if that leads to bad outcomes on particular issues.
Plus, they can delete all your informations, because GDPR mandates it in Europe.
Here’s my solution: I have a github action that checks if the changelog was touched in the diff. It fails tests if not.

It’s impossible to rewind your brain to the time of when the change is made to consider the total impact to the end user. The best time to write a changelog is when the change happens.

For minor stuff that doesn’t need to be in the changelog, the action checks a label and passes if “skip changelog” is applied. But the default is “hey, you forgot to tell users what they should expect with your change”
Nah, there will be some binding arbitration clause hidden on that package of rice , so you can't sue or join a class action.
React really is pretty good as long as it keeps evolving. Innovations tend to come from new frameworks such as Svelte and SolidJS, and then React adopts them — this new compiler is an example.

React is hobbled by the need to retain backward compatibility, but it is boosted by sheer scale and a solid underlying philosophy, design, and engineering.

Someday, we will probably find a fundamentally better philosophy for UI frameworks, but I don't know yet what it will be. React replaced its MVC predecessors with a functional approach, the Flux model.
When Congress writes a law that establishes a new regulatory agency, they outline what that agency does and how they enforce the regulations. Inevitably as time goes on, new edge cases come up or someone realize that the law is ambiguous. Chevron deference established a precedent where the regulatory agencies were allowed to resolve these ambiguous cases or do things not specifically written into the law. This decision means that companies can now fight certain decisions they couldn't previously.

For example, one of the cases that led up to this was due to the National Marine Fisheries Service forcing fishing companies to pay their monitors' salaries. The law established the monitors and their role, but it did not say that the companies must foot the bill.
Actual laws are up to congress etc which frankly don’t understand the intricacies because it’s not their job. So it’s common for agencies to be given authority to oversee something without a law explicitly defining specific level of salt in drinking water etc. Regulators therefore don’t make laws only clarifying where boundaries exist (safe levels > X ppm).

Deference for unintentional ambiguity seems unrelated, but in the real world people want to know where the lines are so they can respond accordingly. Not knowing where the limits are gets expensive for anyone not trying to push boundaries.

Lawsuits meanwhile are horrifically inefficient in terms of time. What exactly are people supposed to do while waiting for a lawsuit to finish? For some things sticking with existing guidelines works but nobody wants to make major investments when the underlying rules are about to change. Clarity is far more valuable than generally perceived and that’s what’s being destroyed here because the courts even decades to make the meanings of laws clear.

This decision is therefore directly and significantly harmful to the US economy.
From Justice Kagan's dissent on page 82:

> This Court has long understood Chevron deference to reflect what Congress would want, and so to be rooted in a presumption of legislative intent. Congress knows that it does not—in fact cannot—write perfectly complete regulatory statutes...

> It knows that those statutes will inevitably contain ambiguities that some other actor will have to resolve, and gaps that some other actor will have to fill. And it would usually prefer that actor to be the responsible agency, not a court...

> Put all that together and deference to the agency is the almost obvious choice, based on an implicit congressional delegation of interpretive authority. We defer, the Court has explained, “because of a presumption that Congress” would have “desired the agency (rather than the courts)” to exercise “whatever degree of discretion” the statute allows. Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A., 517
U. S. 735, 740–741 (1996).

> Today, the Court flips the script: It is now “the courts (rather than the agency)” that will wield power when Congress has left an area of interpretive discretion. A rule of judicial humility gives way to a rule of judicial hubris. In recent years, this Court has too often taken for itself decision-making authority Congress assigned to agencies. The Court has substituted its own judgment on workplace health for that of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration; its own judgment on climate change for that of the Environmental Protection Agency; and its own judgment on student loans for that of the Department of Education.
Regulators don’t make laws and local governments have spent years limiting corporate liability, so I don’t think your opinion on this is based in reality, unfortunately.
Some folks were predicting this:

> It has been nearly 40 years since the Supreme Court indicated in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council that courts should defer to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute. After more than three-and-a-half hours of oral argument on Wednesday, it seemed unlikely that the rule outlined in that case, known as the Chevron doctrine, will survive in its current form. A majority of the justices seemed ready to jettison the doctrine or at the very least significantly limit it.

* https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/01/supreme-court-likely-to-d...

Some of the back and forth during the trial:

> Justice Sonia Sotomayor agreed with Kagan. She doubted whether there can be a “best” interpretation of a law when the justices “routinely disagree” about a law’s meaning. The real question, she said, is who makes the choice about what an ambiguous law means. And if the court needs a “tie-breaker,” she continued, why shouldn’t it defer to the agency, with its expertise?

> Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson posited that the Chevron doctrine serves an important purpose. Under Chevron, she suggested, Congress gives federal agencies the power to make policy choices – such as filling gaps or defining terms in the statute. But if Chevron is overturned and agencies no longer have that power, she predicted, then courts will have to make those kinds of policy decisions.

> But Justice Brett Kavanaugh saw Chevron’s deference to agencies differently. Chevron, he complained, “ushers in shocks to the system every four or eight years when a new administration comes in” and implements “massive change” in areas like securities law, communications law, and environmental law.

* Ibid.

See also perhaps:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v._Natura....

Generally: it seems that the USSC has been more been willing to throw out precedent and (not so?) settled law.

The USSC is about to go on 'summer break', and so is releasing quite a few rulings all at once in a short time frame; a running tally seems to be available at:

* https://www.scotusblog.com/author/scotusblog/

Some seem to think this is a bit of a 'news dump' and 'DoS of attention':

* https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/06/supreme-court-ju...

* https://www.msnbc.com/alex-wagner-tonight/watch/-news-dump-f...

* https://politicaldictionary.com/words/friday-news-dump/
Safyrus Search – ask questions, get answers
> is there anyone who uses Scrum who doesn't use Jira?

Yes, there are quite a few shops that use scrum without using Jira.

However, I'm not aware of a shop using Jira that isn't using scrum. This is useful to suss out job opportunities at companies who use scrum but don't want to advertise it. If they mention Jira, I know it's a scrum shop (important to me because I want to avoid scrum shops.)
Im sure that’s part of it. But you could say the same for using python or R over another language. Besides, someone who knows R well enough to write DplyR thought the situation was dire enough to write it. And there’s also data.table but that is inscrutable to most folks and I have only ever used it for fread - which is 10x faster than any other method of loading csvs into R.
Sometimes, it takes a little pseudo-Nietzsche to turn the chaos of deadlines into the order of achievement. Thanks for sticking with us!
A regulatory body who is not responsible or beholden to the citizenry, and who cannot effectively be balanced by another portion of government?
That is a lot of text for not determining why the new solution is faster. The only relevant part:

> Before our migration, the old pipeline utilized a C library accessed through a Python service, which buffered and bundled data. This was really the critical aspect that was causing our latency.

How much speed up would there have been if they moved to a Rust wrapper around the same C library?

Using something other than Python is almost always going to be faster. This Reddit post does not give any insights into which aspects of Python lead to small/large performance hits. They show that it was the right solution for them with ample documentation which is great, but they don't provide any generalizable information.
I wasn't aware, thank you.
https://archive.ph/8iX0C
'The Crime of the Century,' a Century Later
But Rmd already supported python chunks (as well as other languages such as ruby, which seem to be missing from Qmd)
Glad to hear Shakespeare has found a way to keep you on track; here's to them driving you madly towards productivity!
New laws can be passed to put new policy into place and change those long-standing things explicitly.
Seems like we're evolving from common to civil law, probably for the better in the long run.
I'm actually more interested in doing this at the larger macro scale than the micro scale. Imagine the ability to lift heavy objects with only sound. Weight rooms would look entirely different :)
Commercial airliners are built for extraordinary stress on the airframe. You can get a taste of it here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--LTYRTKV_A

Other people will correct me if I am wrong, but I believe the last time a large commercial airliner was lost to turbulence was 1966.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BOAC_Flight_911
Show HN: A Kotlin/JVM database client for those who want to write SQL
It is implemented for those who like to write SQL directly. Using the Kotlin compiler plugin, I achieve binding parameters using string interpolation.
If the law doesn’t take into account human and corporate behavior, it’s not a good law. It may ultimately be the corporation’s “fault” but that doesn’t change the fact that the law created perverse incentives.

I hear the same argument for the GDPR laws that have resulted in annoying cookie banners everywhere. Sure, it’s technically the website owner’s fault for spying and adding a shitty banner, but… those banners didn’t exist until the law was created.

We need better laws that more wholly account for human behavior.
A Tube map of London rents
A comprehensive picture of how much it costs to rent near almost every station on the capital’s rail network in 2024.

For each station, they’ve gathered the average rent of a one-bedroom flat in 2024, using its surrounding postcode district as a proxy, as well data on how each station’s rent has increased since 2020. Then, they’ve visualised everything as an interactive Tube map.
Obviously an outright bad idea should not be kept around just because that's how we have always done it, but don't underestimate the value of predictability and stability. Society can't operates if laws change every day, even if it's driven by a desire to make the laws better.
The "may contain" line is not the part that the FDA takes issues with. From the source complaint:

> The Brownberry brand Whole Grains 12 Grains and Seeds RTE bread loaf product is misbranded for a similar reason; the product label includes walnuts, almonds, and hazelnuts in the ingredient and “Contains” statements; however, these nuts are not ingredients in the formulation of the product.

Emphasis on "Contains", which is a separate line on the packaging from the "may contain" line.
probably not, they got away with torturing him keeping him imprisoned essentially indefinitely.

It make me sick to think there are people out there who perpetuated and actively worked to destroy this man's life.
I love React. It feels foundational somehow. It's also vindicating after toiling for years on bloated frameworks. Declaratively describe your UI, React paints it. That's it. No app state management. No routing. No learning yet another templating system (which inevitably morphs into a shitty programming language). Just full JS(X optional). No grokking convoluted, bespoke abstractions. It's clean, narrowly scoped, and as simple as possible (but not simpler).

Having recently worked on two legacy apps -- one ASP.NET, one Angular -- it made me deeply appreciate React and how far UI tech has come. Phenomenal work from the React team on more optimizations via this compiler. Good article too.
Because Zuck's AI is so open
If a Federal law telling you what you can and can't do with widgets was ambiguous, then courts were previously required to defer to the Federal Widget Agency's interpretation of the law as long as the judge found the interpretation "reasonable."

Now, if there is a lawsuit or other legal matter over widget usage, the court can take the Federal Widget Agency's interpretation of the law into consideration, but is free to rule however it sees fit on the precise interpretation of Federal widget law.
Thanks, mari0106! We’re thrilled you’re enjoying the ride – here’s to keeping reminders as unexpected as life itself!