skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
And Elon Musk would improve on these 5,000 lb Waymo SUVs carrying 1-2 passengers in favor of 7,000 lb Cybertrucks carrying 1-2 passengers.

The improved 0-60 times alone will prove Elon the more effective accellerationist.
“My haters are just obsessed with me”

“My haters are just jealous”

Or maybe you and your product are actually bad
The scrolling is jumping around like crazy on iOS
Good question, good to get your message.

1. Quality.

2. Quantity

3. Maintaining readiness to measure something that has never been measured (or measured very well) before, at least by me.

When these get big enough, big impact comes along for the ride ;)

Edit: Prompted me well, my leading developer, here's the restated Fuzzism:

Stuff enough quality into the equation, propagate it according to its best nature, you could end up with immeasurable impact in abundance as bycatch.
They used to be and I think it changed at some point, possibly around the end of the Ballmer era
In the past there was a fairly common practice to create a monopoly by outlawing people from importing food to a local economy. People may recognize the concept of mining towns, company stores, or its role in debt slavery.

The practice back in those days were to advertise inflated wages for a job in remote areas. People then traveled there, only to find out that food and living costs, all under the control of the company, were also inflated to the point where even a full working day would results in debt when subtracting food and living costs. People who tried to flee was prevented from doing so under the argument that they tried to escape acquired debt. The fines for smuggling food was also extreme, since food costs was the primary way that the companies held control over their debt slaves.

This practice was so vile that many countries created laws directly targeting it, including changes to inheritance so that debt would not follow from parent to child.
Things better on the ST than the Amiga:

The monochrome monitor & mode was way better for productivity than interlaced Amiga high res.
MS-DOS compatible floppies.
Price. By far.

In any case I don't see them as directly comparable machines. The ST was made to be a cheap Macintosh or PC competitor ("Jackintosh"). Not a multimedia games machine. It wasn't terribly great at games, but it was a great productivity (and MIDI as you say) machine.
It has, but only because X11 apps are programmed in ways that don't work well on slow networks. They are programmed so poorly for networks that VNC works better. You can write a network-efficient one if you want to, and it will work better than VNC. Meanwhile, all Wayland apps work the VNC way, by design.
> It's not like Barcelona is fully developed border to border

The city of Barcelona quite literally is fully developed border to border. Or where are you suggesting these new developments are gonna be made?
Not really. There isn't much that langchain is doing in this regard. The heavy lifting is already done by the original libs like from openai which they use and the rest are just wrappers around their api calls.
Seems like capacitors, inductors and batteries differ only quantitively in their response curves, not in qualitatively? As in they all do different things to the circuit on the voltage, amperage and time axis? We would need separate words for them, but accumulators seems like a decent umbrella.
Wait until they hear about some mushrooms with more than twenty thousand genders.
Can you please list 3 of those ways. I'm not seeing it.
Only a tiny proportion of all books ever written have made a living for their authors. Most people write because they want to.
I don't say you are wrong but there was a DTP story on the ST with Calamus: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calamus_(DTP)
(maybe more popular in Europe than in the US)
The fact that these things were lies at the time should frame any reading of any current promises made by the V project. I have written the project off and am not aware of its current status, but I believe that its recent history (that article from 2022 is not 5 years old) should frame anyone's reading of current promises made by the project.
The solution there seems trivial: Don't train on EU users' data. Then you won't need to revoke anything, and you get exactly as much data as if you don't launch at all.
Well can you please list the actual reasons the product is a scam?
>A DB schema is not visual

How is it not visual?

>Boxes with arrows is a way to represent it. Text is another one.

Boxes with arrows are clearly visual. The text, at least, for me just is a representation of those arrows and boxes.
It's true the ST had almost no presence in that market. The Tramiels I think wanted to get in there and really shake it up, but they made some mis-steps.

GDOS (part of GEM with proportional fonts etc) not shipping with the original machine was a huge mistake for one.

Still Calamus + the cheap Atari laser printer was a pretty amazing piece of DTP kid for the people who got it.

That and it was simple to just turn your ST into a Macintosh. But with higher resolution and slightly higher clock speed.
A lesson I learned very early on: don't use -ffast-math unless you know what it does. It has a very appealing name that suggests nice things. You probably won't ever need it.
It allows you to charge a refundable deposit before letting clients book a spot on your existing Calendly links.
I use that architecture. You still use mocks at the edges.
The Credibility Trap
Intel's explanation (at section 15.12): https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/814198?fileName=24...

> In Intel microarchitectures prior to Skylake, the SSE divide and square root instructions DIVPS and SQRTPS have a latency of 14 cycles (or the neighborhood) and they are not pipelined. This means that the throughput of these instructions is one in every fourteen cycles. The 256-bit Intel AVX instructions VDIVPS and VSQRTPS execute with 128-bit data path and have a latency of twenty-eight cycles and they are not pipelined as well.

> In microarchitectures that provide DIVPS/SQRTPS with high latency and low throughput, it is possible to speed up single-precision divide and square root calculations using the (V)RSQRTPS and (V)RCPPS instructions. For example, with 128-bit RCPPS/RSQRTPS at five-cycle latency and one-cycle throughput or with 256-bit implementation of these instructions at seven-cycle latency and two-cycle throughput, a single Newton-Raphson iteration or Taylor approximation can achieve almost the same precision as the (V)DIVPS and (V)SQRTPS instructions

(emphasis mine)
As a non-usian it seems kind of weird to see someone from the US declare that using weapons to keep people working is a non-usian thing to do, when a lot of the news we get from over there is cops killing people, school shootings, stuff about school-prison pipelines, things like that.

Then there are the genocidal militias employed by US companies to keep people from unionising, the genocidal treatment of indonesians, and so on.
“Good artists copy; great artists steal” - attributed to Picasso
Really seems cool! Are you guys hiring?
I like formats which are XML except without the <?xml?> and xmlns stuff. However, most XML I encounter does have that stuff, so it's a reason why I usually hate dealing with XML. This shouldn't be difficult to comprehend. You don't have to run defence for a file format like this.
Although I probably have my price, I too otherwise refuse to work for companies that'd force me to use windows. I've been lucky to be able to use macs since 2008 and some of those companies had linux users. Most top tech companies will happily give you a choice between a mac or windows. For me it has generally mean I don't work for banks, the government, or very large organizations that aren't recent tech companies.

That being said, at a certain scale or type of company centralized management, software support, and security risks mean "allowing" random people to run their own OS becomes difficult and risky. Lots of large older companies probably have proprietary software, too (thankfully more of this is becoming web based).

Yes, in theory linux is more secure and anybody who would want to use it is probably capable of taking care of themselves, but it is probably (at large companies) corporate lawyers and CISOs ruining the fun. And linux can have its own risks and dedicating a team to support (from a security perspective) them isn't economical for the what would be very small user base. Ye old big bank can't and arguably shouldn't allow it without an otherwise good reason.
> Fabs got too expensive; that was why...

I would phrase that as "fabs got so complex that zero-ish companies had leadership competent enough to manage both competitive fabs, and the rest of the finance / design / marketing / sales / support stack.

Even back in the mid-80's, when fabs were (relatively) dead simple and dirt cheap, Motorola was famously bungling at fabbing their own 68000-series chips.
What do you need me to explain to you?
Fixing a memory leak of xmlEntityPtr in librsvg
Yup, why I mentioned it. I first saw a mouse on an ST, triggering much desire compared to my Amstrad CPC-464. The Amiga arrived and that was gorgeous. I would try draw the Porsche pic pixel by pixel (https://imgur.com/gallery/jim-sachs-porsche-on-amiga-OMc99EB) on my own hand-crafted drawing program but the Amstrad has a tough time of it. Finally later got an Amiga 500. Never saw an Archimedes outside of magazines but the talk of RISC was intriguing.
Re: Kaczynski, I think he stopped being an analyst in 1969, and switched to being a non-mathematician prepper?

(and usually analysis is pretty far from logic in various people's maps of mathematics, but here's an exception, in which the "plains of analysis" [sic] are right next to the "ocean of logic": https://utenti.quipo.it/base5/scuola/mate_metafor_mathematis... )

For some reason non-French non-logician non-social-commentariens remind me of https://existentialcomics.com/comic/541

Lagniappe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TilQ8BIHisw

(unfortunately going in the other direction, as with Yuri and Tonya Zhivago, I believe Vladimir Vysotsky might've done better —at least healthwise if not artistically— to have spent much more time in Paris with Marina)
> See the illegal police stations[0] they have setup across the world.

Started by
>According to Matt Schrader, writing for the Jamestown Foundation, "overseas Chinese service stations"

> Central Intelligence Agency Director William J. Casey helped back the formation of the Jamestown Foundation

Directly written by the CIA, you dont even have to jump hoops.
I believe you have been given links which explain that in great detail.
Only for Amiga fans with a complex of some kind. I was a member of a local Atari users group and none of us were comparing to the Amiga? Mac and PC were the competitors because most of us were interested in productivity software and the like. Many were running Mac emulation on the ST and the biggest uses were MIDI sequencers and DTP.

Amiga was just something else. Impressive achievement, certainly. But for what it was I had no need to pay that kind of extra $$ just to play games better.
Pet peeve: this isn't "your own constant folder in C/C++"… it's "your own enabling constant folding in C/C++"…

With "own constant folder" I expected a GCC/clang plugin that does tree/control flow analysis and some fancy logic in order to determine when, where and how to constant fold…
I have a similar issue using a (non-google) videoconferencing tool on Firefox. It is very irritating that I have to switch browsers (both Konqueror and Chrome work) just for my VC needs...

I think it is a Firefox issue (another friend reported the same issue).
How is prose more readable than bullets?
Or they think they are killer features, and that EU citizens will complain that the "bad EU" isn't letting "good guy Apple" give us the features we want.

It's too bad that the thing Apple cares most about is retaining their monopoly position over the iOS ecosystem. Leveling the playing field would be great for consumers, I really hope the EU can achieve it.
It's true, not "laughably false". I've seen with my own eyes the most effective developer in a company being paid in the bottom quartile, as well as a vice versa case.

In the former case, we basically had to demand management raise his salary to the low end of his market value, over the cause of six months, until they finally gave in. It was just so disgusting to us we couldn't let it go.

The reason comes down to a skill bias - it's a different skill set to navigate other people into getting yourself a good salary, versus navigating the ins and outs of coding. The skills don't overlap, so time spent on one detracts from another.

In the end he finally got the message we kept ramming in to his head, applied to work at a brand-name tech company, and instantly more than doubled his salary. He could've done so years earlier.

This stuff is the norm. I've been a manager having eyes on salaries while also having eyes on people's performance (although unfortunately not much of a lever on the former), and rest assured it is often a very jarring experience. Like "that person should be let go immediately / that person should job hop immediately".
Sorry to hurt anybody's feelings who absolutely hates electrochemistry.

Or industrial-scale chemical operations.

I don't blame you, this stuff can be confusing.
> There is a chess variant like this - Crazy house.

Interesting, I've always heard it referred to as "Bughouse" or "Siamese chess".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bughouse_chess
It's not odd. The concern is that EU regulators would make it less private.

By design Apple doesn't have access to your data used with Apple Intelligence, nor does anybody else. If EU regulators decide those features need to be interoperable and offered on a fully level playing field, that puts Apple in the position of having to provide third parties with access to data that they as platform owner have made a concerted effort to not have access to.
The problem i see is that process designers do not have to justify the costs they inflict on economic +generating activity. Its purely designed by informal power struggles of "of course my department has to be looped in".. And thats the dilemma at the heart of all bureaucracy.. At the core its powerstruggles eating time and effectivity.

And to fight it, one would need sort of a controlling office that reports to and limits the damage done by powerstruggles. Never seen that in a company.
>I'd like to understand - Can you explain this? It seems like it would be easy to have a Turing machines that uses the other two Turing machines, adding one digit at a time until it finds a difference.

I assume it runs into problems when you try to check if 2 > 2.
> doesn’t it then mean that whatever process is encoded in the NN, it should both be possible to represent in some more efficient representation...?

Not if NNs are complex systems[1] whose useful behavior is emergent[2] and therefore non-reductive[3]. In fact, my belief is that if NNs and therefore also LLMs aren't these things, they can never be the basis for true AI.[4]

---

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_system

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergence

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductionism, https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almana..., https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34519/chapter-abstrac...

[4] Though being these things doesn't guarantee that they can be the basis for true AI either. It's a minimum requirement.
There were no lies at the time.

V not running on every single Linux distro on release is not a lie.

V compiling without deps is not a lie (cc v.c).

etc

The 2019 article is 5 years old. Easy to count.
I think this is actually addressed in the article:

> The key question for the designer is, “What would the system’s structure need to be so that <some feature> would be no harder to implement than necessary?” (It’s a bit surprising when designers don’t ask this question, instead simply asking, “What should the design look like?”—for what purpose?)

During my career, I have been in many situations where the SW architects tried to answer the second question: as if the architectural cleanliness was the goal unto itself. Software design patterns were misused, unneeded abstractions abounded everywhere, class hierarchies were created 15+ levels deep. There it was often brought up which is better and nicer and cleaner because the metric was aestetics.

Most of those arguments, however, are quickly brought to a stop, if we are actually asking the first question: how hard is it to add these new features? That said, I was frequently unable to convince coworkers in my past employments, that aestetics of the design is not the goal. They simply clung to it, to somewhat religious extent, identifying themselves with their "artwork".
Bugs, drugs and electric venom: is this the most deadly library in the world?
In Poland you get a notification from social security bureau that your employer did not pay your insurance on time.
Can anyone think of a giga-corporation, in a minimally-regulated and monopolistic industry, which did prove itself trustworthy on the child safety front?
Now I'm wondering about other senses. I can readily imagine sounds and pictures, but it took my brain some time before it figured out how to imagine smells and tactile sensations when I asked it, like a muscle that is rarely exercised.

Since my imagination layers on top of my existing senses, I wonder if aphantasia is really about the (in)ability to induce sensory hallucinations at will (and to what extent). That's about the only way I can make sense of it personally, given my own subjective experience.
But I had a Samsung PalmOS phone with no keyboard or numpad or dpad, and a full color touch home screen grid of 3rd party app icons, in full final production in the hands of users like me, in 2000 or 2001.

Samsung SPH-i300
Apple Silicon means no discrete graphics card and no CUDA, no DirectX. It seems fine for machine learning, it falls short for other intensive applications.

Apple Silicon has the power envelope advantage, Intel and AMD chips remain faster for those who can deal with the power consumption (under lock when longer battery is really needed, and either be plugged or have a backup battery when going full throttle)
Ask HN: Would a restaurant naming its dishes after pathogens be good marketing?
For example, a dish containing chicken might be called the bird flu special.

Of course, the food would be at least as safe as required by law.
The US is still a colonial project, Puerto Rico being the obvious example. It's irrelevant however.

You describe 1863 as ancient history, so I'm not keen on putting any trust into the words you're using or claims to being educated on the subject.
The internet is now made up of 35% staged videos, 35% ads and the rest are just AI generated seo landfill trash
WolfET was such good fun, awesome.
Several years is many months
Well, you can either try to comply with the spirit of the law and work with the EU to clarify, or you can maliciously comply with the letter and get fined.

I'm not a lawyer, but I didn't need to be one to see the 0.5 €/user/yr fee and think "yeeeeah that won't fly".

Or maybe Apple's legal team should hire me to advise on the spirit of the law.
Fantastic! Thank you for explaining this.
So it's a bad driver then, because matching flow of traffic is more important and safer than stubbornly following the exact speed limit
Because everyone drives 40mph on that main road that is marked 25mph, and there is no string of accidents or fatalities after decades of this.
Ok, but then they should explain this particular case better. The RHS can be figured out just by choosing the overloaded operators.

In C++ terms, if you have int& operator+(const int&x, const int& y) then (1 + 1) is not ambiguous and can be selected fast. Same for unary minus etc.

The Swift devs should then blog about this example and explain step by step what is going on. If the literal "1" can be both an int and a float, that of course would be insane. Is that what you meant by "polymorphic literals"?
Ever had a lucid dream?
x11 is absurdely gigantic and dirty compared to core wayland.

We can implement an alternative of a real-life wayland compositor reasonably. A real-life alternative xserver+window manager is not on the same order of magnitude in terms of work.

That reason alone is enough, but if you dig a bit deeper you'll find more reasons to drop x11: you don't need external libs, code is static, x11 bazillion of libs is an abomination of ABIs, much better emphasis on interfaces being optional, etc. For us, wayland is not planned obsolescence, we mean core wayland from a few years ago. We am expecting sabotage by toxic people pouring tons of interfaces in "core" (like they are doing for vulkan3D sabotage... and what they did for x11).

We am still running native x11, only because we run the steam client and only because of that (like 32bits support code).

We are expected to write our own wayland compositor (linux dmabuf, plain and simple C99), then we will have to suffer xwayland for the sake of that horrible steam client, because we have a sin: we play native (#noproton) elf/linux games.
I don't want links to articles that claim V is a scam because it uses git and electricity.

I want examples of actual false claims on the website. Because you originally said every single claim on the website is a lie.
Bughouse is the 4 player version played on 2 boards. A lot easier to play with conventional physical boards.
same boat, fedora at home, windows at work. and that's fine -- keeps me plugged into the windows infra that runs the world to some degree.

older jobs let us put whatever on the laptops, and even had hardening scripts if we wanted to use linux. only approved linux was ubuntu, but you could slap mint or other derivatives in there and get away with it / not have concerns.
Well it's often said lisp and forth are very close…
* Clearer narrative

* Connection between points

* Flows better

* Eyes don't start-stop as much
Sometimes I daydream about what would happen if FTL communications were possible, but only over short millimeters. It’d seem useless right?

Until someone figured out how to put it in chips! Faster processing and memory.

Also there would be a poetry to FTL via quantum entanglement being possible only as a speculative “guess”, similar to specter but on the quantum hardware of the universe. Sure FTL signals might be impossible but guessing at FTL signals might not be. ;)
I'm pretty sure I don't get any "social signal" from using fancy taxis. I think you've got to own the vehicle for that to happen.

Much like buying a museum ticket to see a famous painting isn't comparable to owning the same painting.
That's interesting. Thanks for the link.

The amount of developers that were building retro servers with modern stacks for their clones was really impressive.
That’s a restaurant chain that serves Parsi food afaik! Like a modernized Brittania. I remember that they hired mostly hearing impaired wait staff and have instructions for interacting with them. It’s a really cool concept and the food is good too.
Fun fact: Ethereum transaction does not include sender's address or pubkey.

It is calculated from the signature.

I'm not sure if Bitcoin can use this trick, at least the classic transaction types explicitly included pubkey.
I still think of Tomb Raider as being Core Design
Either of the two examples you gave work.
This is a Clang or even LLVM code generation issue and entirely unrelated to the C and C++ standards (-ffast-math, intrinsics and inline assembly are all compiler-specific features not covered by the standards).

Most other language ecosystems most likely suffer from similar problem if you look under the hood.

At least compilers like Clang also give you the tools to workaround such issues, as demonstrated by the article.
Structured Generation Shoot-Out