skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I’d imagine most things are designed in rectangular constraints
I read 'git log -p' often, and linear history makes it so much easier. The same with bisecting. I'm yet to see any practical advantage of not allowing rebase/squash in feature branches. Preserving all history of feature branches is not an advantage to me. The history I care about is the history of the main branch and I don't want to see it splint into many tiny commits, especially not into commits looking like add/fix/fix/fix/fix where at all point except the last the code is broken.
I imagine they're referring to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_chromodynamics
You are missing that to drive one-self home is a metaphor, possibly a visual metaphor in this case, for DIY self-service in the private domain, as it were.
Spin coat as a circle then cut out a rectangle perhaps? I have no idea where the costs end up
I’ve heard a lot of debate about this point here in Australia. In the state of NSW, people on their learner permit are restricted to driving no more than 90km/h (55 miles per hour). Arguably, this is safer because learner drivers haven’t learned to control their cars well yet.

Here in Vic (the next state over), people think that law is stupid because it’s apparently less safe having everyone on a freeway driving at different speeds. It makes changing lanes much more difficult and dangerous. Here learner drivers are expected and encouraged to match the speed of traffic (obviously obeying speed signs too).

I suspect vic is right on this one. It probably is more dangerous having different drivers driving at different speeds. At least, more dangerous to human drivers. But what do you expect Google to do about it? Make their entire fleet break the road rules? Their licence to drive their cars on the roads at all is on a trial basis. They’re being closely watched by everyone. Even if it’s potentially unsafe for other drivers who are speeding, sticking to the letter of the law is really the only choice they have here. Maybe in time all traffic will flow at the posted speed. And officials will finally feel comfortable raising the speed limit to match the speed everyone actually comfortably drives at on the roads.
I think most people these days just look at PRs. Everything else is largely noise.
Quarterly Business Review Template for HR
June is a big month - it's not just the halfway point of the year,
but also the end of another quarter. Time flies when you're busy making a huge impact, right?
Speaking of impact, we know HR plays a critical role in keeping our companies running smoothly and our teams thriving. But sometimes, showcasing that impact can be tough.
We're giving you a free HR Quarterly Business Review Template to help you easily track your department's accomplishments and demonstrate the value you bring to the table
I prefer -funsafemath. Who doesn't want their math to be fun and safe?
> I have Accubattery installed, so it pings to tell me to unplug it, …

Just as a PSA, you can create an Automation in the built-in Shortcuts App to do something similar.

(Show Notification / Speak Text on Battery Level below 20% / above 80% - enable Automation, and turn off Ask Before Running and Notify When Run)
Tariffs do decrease competition and lead to higher prices for consumers....but...there are certain industries important for national security where a country may wish to subsidize an industry like building renewables or use a tariff against a country like China that is trying to corner the market through nationalized companies. Because those companies are a wing of their government (so to speak) a free market company can't compete and eventually all you have are Chinese companies for these critical industries and they can dictate policy to us.
Life plus 70 is scarcely "nearly infinite", and since Disney didn't try to extend the Sonny Bono copyright extension so as to keep "Steamboat Willie" in copyright, this doesn't seem likely to change.

It's also the result of an international consensus:

http://copyright.nova.edu/copyright-duration/
Julia has this (via a @fastmath macro) and it's so nice!
Your mistrust is not unreasonable. However I think if state actors/rightsholders/CF were serious about monitoring user activity covertly they could just simply volunteer to host a mirror/CDN for Anna. And that would also expsoe paying users.
This is such an interesting topic. I believe I also have aphantasia and I find that communicating about the topic is rather challenging as the right vocabulary doesn't seem to exist (or I'm ignorant of it).

I have no "mind's eye" and can't produce an image in my head. But confusingly, I am quite good at the mental 3D manipulation. I can spin the cow in my head and describe its orientation, but I don't actually see the cow, I just know it. I suppose my brain just has a different way of approaching this problem than visually.

This is where the language is tough. I'm not visualizing or imagining as those words describe the act of using a mental image. I'm perceiving the cow? It is hard to communicate.
My main gripe is that we were never given the chance to opt out. This is where I would start.

I don't think that there's a perfect solution and I agree that the technology is amazing. I just wish that we didn't deny the impact of taking work from creators while denying them the rewards.
Yeah it doesn't exist under that name in the US or China, so the obvious conclusion is that it's a fake name given to make it look more American.
Well, you could argue that they’re developing a new technology and get to have some exclusive rights for a couple of years. Like patents.
They are using integer literals, not Ints. Any type can declare the ability to be representable by any literal. Double can be represented by floating point literals or integer literals (since Double, the type, can represent integers, the category of number).
You'll need to put down ~35%, or almost $128,000, to afford a typical home
I’d recommend to read the reflective practitioner, by Donald Schön
> every time someone repeats the meme "capitalism bad!" they are perpetuating their own crusade

That's called 'false equivalence'. Discussions about economic systems can be had without being crusades.

> at that point it is ok to go and defend capitalism according to HN guidelines

No, I don't think the spirit of the guidelines is to permit "ideological battles" as long as "someone else starts it". The clear intent of the guidelines is to discourage ideological crusade altogether.

> Its those who start attacking capitalism everywhere that needs to stop if this happens too often

'Selective enforcement'. Your argument suggests that it's okay to defend capitalism in response to criticism, but doesn't extend the same courtesy to those criticizing capitalism.

> since they are almost always the instigators.

A generalization without any evidence. Also, capitalism is currently the dominant system in the West, making it both the obvious starting point for discussion of economic systems, and the most productive candidate for legitimate criticism.

I think your comment shows severe bias and an adversarial approach to discussion. Maybe you could form an appreciation for the spirit of fostering curiosity and constructive dialogue that is promoted here.
It really is just save your files and database encoded with it and use the right meta tag.
> The new pod will have a different IP.

Usually clients would connect to a Kubernetes svc to not have the problem with changing IPs. Even for just a single pod I would do that.
I scored a cheap 7-disc changer at university surplus, specifically for that game. It was only a 2x drive behind the changer, and I needed to source a SCSI controller card and cable, but I got it all going and suddenly I had LUNs galore!

D: disc1, E: disc2, F: disc3, G: disc4, H:empty I:empty: J:empty.

The game was kind enough to let you specify different drives for the discs rather than assuming a single swapping situation, though it would check them all at launch time, which was quite a slow affair. But once it was going, it was great; as you moved between regions in the game, the drive would simply change discs and spin up the new one and away you went.

ISTR they did a certain amount of duplication, some overlap between regions would be on both discs, so it wouldn't require swapping constantly if you were right on a border. But at some points it would flip back and forth, and the changer made all the difference.
Humans too can be committed to beliefs that are not true. I have friend that believes in and regularly consults her "clairvoyant". I wonder if our AI assistants in the future will be vulnerable to suspicions or popular fantasies about the world, people, or even other AIs they interact with.
But but but that the Griffiths translated "contents" line up nicely with the 1938 hanzi contents doesn't excite you?

https://banned-historical-archives.github.io/articles/43e710...
I mean, at some point, why not just write a custom compiler?
> "Price. By far."

In the UK, the Atari ST was originally £299 while the Amiga was £499, so it's not really fair to compare the two. I was able to save up for an ST with various weekend and school holiday jobs, but there's no way I could have saved up for an Amiga (and the only classmates I knew with Amigas had their parents buy it for them).
>It absolutely melts my mind every time I come across the two facts that:
- People experience their thoughts very differently
- We all secretly believe that deep down, everyone experiences thought like we do.

Well, the first is not exactly right. People might experience thoughts differently, but not that widely so. It's not like "anything goes", more like there are a few cases, and people fall into one or the other (e.g. some can have aphantasia).

And the second, while right, is hardly "mind melting". Why would people assume otherwise, since the only immediate empirically seen thinking they have access to is their own?

(Especially since different modes of thinking is not exactly "anything goes" as we said, so the second-hand examples of thinking they have, e.g. people describing or mimicking thinking and inner monologues in movies and books, match how the majority thinks)
I find the biggest issues in industry and organizations is so called “tech debt” and no plan for future improvement of a solution as it matures or user base scales. Planning for these is essential.
In addition to nanolithography and nanoassembly, there is 3d printing with graphene.

From https://all3dp.com/2/graphene-3d-printing-can-it-be-done/ :

> However, because the atomic bonds are only in the lateral direction, it can only exist in 2D. Once multiple layers of graphene are stacked one onto each other, you get graphite, which has relatively poor properties. This means 3D printing pure graphene is impossible. A 3D structure is only possible when graphene is mixed with a binder.

There are so many non-graphene forms of carbon.

Is peptide glass a suitable binder for multilayered graphene for semiconductor and superconductor computing?

Do or can aerogels already contain binder?
If anyone has tried it, please give your opinion :) I wonder what the limitations of this product are.
Surely there’s data involved at some point that needs to have a shape?
1. This doesn’t indicate language is necessary for thought but rather that language is useful for refining thought. If anything it shows that some form of thought exists before it is articulated into language. I would assume inverse cases also exist, where articulation into language narrows a thought down into the vocabulary of a language.

2. I thought rare individuals who did not develop language abilities (e.g due to isolation) still had
memories of their time prior to thought. The most obvious example to me is Helen Keller, who writes about her time prior to meeting her teacher.
hahaha. That video showing the bug. It's literally bugs flying around everywhere.
Interesting how the first vulnerability in VisionOS was an old bug from iOS repurposed for VisionOS
My prompts are in my comment. Your ChatGPT link sends me to a login screen.

Humans (or English speakers at least) aren’t confused at all by the pair of sentences in my last comment. If you’re just going to try to deny the plain facts about how these sentences are (and aren’t) interpreted by English speakers then that’s really just a kind of grammatical flat-Earthism. The judgments at issue aren’t remotely subtle.

> Well, WE are statistical models as well.

This is begging the question. Chomsky would deny this.
Always use --force-with-lease.
You're right. But, I work in lithography, and there are only positives for going to rectangular wafers. We will be able to clamp is better, I think acceleration stresses will be easier to manage, modeling will be easier because it will be per field exactly the same, and so on. Litho industry (which basically means ASML at this point) might jump on this.

But I'll reiterate I mean all this on a lighter note, don't think it will happen within my career :).

Edit: Didn't read the question you asked in the first sentence. The left over parts are usually just taken along in the process till the end and are scapped when we get to the cutting stage. The problems arise because the structures on the partial dies are not the same as the full dies in the middle of the wafer. This causes a bunch of weird stresses on the edge and in my small corner of engineering we optimize the fuck out of the edge dies so their stresses are less weird.
Happens to me all the time with Google because I'm choosing not to pay for their backup. They constantly bother me about almost running out of space, even with a modal that requires you to use a toggle to dismiss it without accepting. It's gross.
Not much here, and a lot of the (overwrought) commentary comes off as stilted/immature:

> Rather than say something sensible like, “art isn’t defined by merit,” or, “not all art has to have a message behind it, art can simply be,” nerds insisted that the most beautiful and meaningful games were in fact works of high literature, rather than just corporate art intended to profit from nerd cultural taste, in much the same way as a Marvel film.

I also felt like the author gave a pretty limited view of the current video game scene. It seemed ironic for the article to open with a mea culpa of reopening an old argument while not actually mentioning many modern games - or grappling with the modern question of what a game even is. Ebert contended that a game ceased to be a game given certain conditions, which is silly from today’s views IMO:

> …a immersive game without points or rules, but I would say then it ceases to be a game and becomes a representation of a story, a novel, a play, dance, a film.

Even the older game selections could have been better: That Dragon, Cancer or Journey make for far more illuminating comparisons vis a vis games-as-art than some PS4 launch title, and both received a lot of press back then.

In terms of modern art games, look no further than Disco Elysium.
Single parents holding down a brutal job(s), areas that are majorly under served by meager retail offerings, folks with mobility impairments, the need for specific items that are hard to get in a timely fashion from other online solutions, the list goes on.

Time in a weekday tends to be at a steep premium for me personally; between Amazon and my local grocery store that offers online ordering and in-person pickup, these offerings are a lifesaver.
Funny all the criticism LLMs get for hallucinations/conflabulations as if humans aren't often worse offenders at this very behavior unintentionally or intentionally.

I think you're not mad, but rather demonstrate a learned behavior to a very common situation any person finds themself in. IE they don't know or aren't sure if they don't know and any case don't want to appear as if they don't know certainly so they put in the least amount of effort to obscure ascertaition with some fancy distracting magicians hoodwink.

I think getting answers to nuanced/frontier or non-frontier problems can involve different sets of brain processes and behaviors. For already solved problems with knowledge thats pervasive throughout society, the solution is simply observation and copying, OR recollection and re-execute from memory.

For other problems one can figure out through reasoning and extrapolation.

For other problems no amount of armchair reasoning and theorizing will figure out (frontier problems not yet solved by any humans or at least humans accessible ) it, and they will need to do some trial and error exploration within reality on the path to solving a problem. Thinking in language, recalling by search and retrieval isn't going to find a solution to the problem at hand in these situations, but humans will try and jam the square peg into the circular hole especially if thats easier to do (and it is) than expending a lot more trial and error energy to do reality based experiements instead of pure clean easy brain processes of keyword/descriptor search and retrieval.

Search and retrieval with or without words is a very quick and easy brain process, perhaps anything you do that solely involve those brain processes you perform excellently at. Not all problems solely rely on these process such as analyzing new unsolved puzzles put on your doorstep. Perhaps there's a habitual behavior where you're trying to over-rely on the quick processes and doing the magicians trick to obscure the lack of actual solution with the hopes of retaining social standing. Instead of slowing things down attempting the slow bog down of actually finding the problem while communicating as such OR making use of human language for its actual purpose and networking for someone who has already solved the problem and deferring to their authority.

But all and all humans collectively are driven to collect (no, hoard greedily) solutions to problems at or not at the frontier and incorporate/encode those into their brain in a way that the solutions can be searched and retrieved in an efficient reflex like manner that's conducive to your ADHD speed.

I suck at language but am good at analytical stuff and because of that I'm not going to put any more effort into reducing this lengthy TLDR literature rambling into a concise conducive to reading snippet. My apologies to those that don't skip over this and trudge through this Thesis length reading.
if u understand that c/c+ purpose was at first to write an OS...u somewhat are aware of this....but that would depend upon your CS classroom studies exposure...

In my case it was by accident as I picked up assembly and machine language before I touched C in the late 1980s.
Huh.

Indeed, we agree.

We just need to do the hardest part: keep it clean and simple to not particularly discourage alternative implementations... on the long run.
Rollup is slow as hell. I’m working with a project where the builds take minutes on an M3 Pro.

I’d like to switch to something like esbuild but it uses a lot of features like aliases so would take some work to translate and the lib is being moved away from anyway. If I can drop something in that speeds it up I’m all for it
Okay, kids, play on my lawn
Laws are necessarily very blunt things. The actual optimal speed limit will vary with car, driver, traffic, weather, time of day etc, would vary hugely along the road and wouldn't be in neat 5mph increments.

But making such dynamic limits would be an extremely expensive endeavour.
Two rules of rebasing that I follow strictly:

1. Never rebase a shared branch
2. Never break rule 1
"Peak of feeling fancy when you have something new and special."?

"Peak of new people having access to their first cdrom drive"... hmm.

"Peak of this new thing totally changing the game, even if it gets more popular later, because it's mundane by the time that happens."?

"Peak of breathless press releases about MuLtImEdIa Cd-RoM"... That's probably it.
States That Have Passed Universal Free School Meals (So Far)
The problem I run into is when a developer merges the main line branch into their feature branch repeatedly to get new changes. Now your branch is completely tangled up and difficult to change
Exactly, it shows how much Jobs was disconnected from reality. When others do it, it's no longer "great artists steal"?
> Probably 100% safer too

Not really. Because speed works in relative. I.e. if everyone drives at 200mph it is much safer than if half drive 100mph and other half drives 200mph. Granted you can't have things appearing at 200mph.

Speed is not the problem deceleration is. Which happens more often when some percent of people drives slower than others.

Decreasing speed limits has the counterintuitive effect of increasing vehicle to vehicle accidents, and intuitive effect of increasing ticket fees. Pedestrian safety isn't that imprcted since a portion of drivers drives above limit anyway.
I had Amigas from around 1989 (starting with an A500) through 1994 (A3000.) The system stability improved incredibly with OS 2.0.

However, fundamentally, there were problems that could not be fixed. The entire OS was based on shared memory and message passing based on pointers. Tasks (processes) would read/write each others memory all the time. There was basically no way to implement memory protection without breaking all compatibility.
I would challenge you to find a processor on which the rsqrt plus two newton-raphson iterations is not slower than plain sqrt. (We don't know what mtune the author used)
If I'm making a change that people are likely to wonder about, I tend to add comments. Basically, anything that's not obvious tends to get a comment, change or no.
__builtin_constant_p(vec) is not inquiring if the contents of vec is constant. The compilers are not being fickle. The statement is not performing the question that the developer intended.
Pretty close to me too. 98th percentile for Internal Verbalization, 88th percentile for Visual Imagery, average for all the others.

I'm constantly talking to myself in my head as if I'm talking to a duplicate of myself. Asking questions, providing answers, having full back and forward conversations (especially with programming). There are certainly days though where, if you have a lot going on, you can start to burn yourself out with conversation (since every single action of the day comes with a conversation). Even if it's just "Oh I should make a coffee. Did I have a coffee yet? No, I think you had one this morning. What about if I made one anyway. Yeah I think that would be fine. Oh do I need to boil water? I suppose I should check if the water is hot. Yep looks like I do have to boil some". and after a while you just get sick of talking to yourself. But you can't switch it off and it drives you a bit batty sometimes.

I asked my wife once if she constantly narrates her own day, she said absolutely no. She said she only really has an internal monologue when reading things from text. And she writes down a lot of stuff on text. But other than that, she answered confused by my question "...nothing? I guess? Quiet?"

Brains are interesting!
Same in Australia - though that amount varies by state! In NSW, everyone goes 10-15% over the limit. Just like California. In Vic, they have speed cameras everywhere and they’re crazy strict about it. People joke about speeding fines being part of their taxes for the year.

Apparently they even have entry and exit cameras on some freeways - and they take photos of everyone to check your average speed. Even if they don’t catch you in the act of speeding, if your average speed is over the limit they’ll still send you a fine.

The moral of the story: Don’t speed in Melbourne. It’s a meme that everyone who visits the state gets done at least once. Everyone in Sydney has a friend who’ll tell you the harrowing tale of their vacation speeding fines.
Actually, the digitising part is what I find the most acceptable. Why shouldn't they be allowed to do this? Would you have the same problem if they bought ebooks in MOBI, converted them and then lent out EPUB versions.

The lending out more copies than they bought part is what there are some good arguments against.
Still not your idea or product though, isn't it.