skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Generally like Jeff’s stuff but maybe rename this to “Remote shell into a Raspberry pi without a VPN”?

Otherwise no one on hacker news is going to care. We’ve been doing that for years on planes with traditional home VPNs or things like Tailscale.
this happens to me with big sheets it's annoying
I had both Catz and Dogz but I don’t recall them ever interacting with the desktop.

Fun toy though. Kind of like a tamagotchi.
ASCII Star Wars is a limitation of the Pi? Bandwidth isn't always all that limited in-flight. I've watched plenty of sports on my phone.
Well, we're talking about population-level health here, not individuals. And, in general, places where it's easier to get around using your own body have healthier people. Our current tax policy actively disincentivizes this - literally collecting _less_ tax could result in better health outcomes if it meant narrower, safer streets (which are cheaper to build and maintain), less parking (parking spots can cost tens of thousands of USD/EUR depending on where they are, and more insidiously, often displace housing), etc.
many functional languages (if not all) do not have arrays (intended as a contiguous areas of memory containing indexable elements of fixed size) they are usually left as an implementation as libraries (i.e. Haskell's Data.Array)

There are also easy workarounds to that (including NIFs), I personally never needed arrays in Elixir
Yale in particular has a bimodal distribution. I’d say that any Yale JD can get a job for $200k+ if they want it. But a large percentage choose public interest, clerkships or government, which pay less.

By comparison, Harvard and Columbia grads had the same median starting salary last year, $215k.
Remember how they used to have links at the bottom of pages? If you scroll fast enough many implementations still retain them. That was one bandwagon people were quick to thoughtlessly jump on and even YouTube was half-assing it last I checked.
I would think that any more than one would be incorrect.
It might be, if it had traditional GUI objects, and if it were straight-forward to compile to a small, easily distributed stand-alone binary.
You all probably know this, but the way that a cursor changes to an icon of a hand when hovering over a link was directly inspired by HyperCard. In many ways a browser is a development of a Hypercard stack.
We’ve been using this in production for the last three months and I can report it has been fairly smooth overall. Only very minor downtime, and we’ve received a lot of communication from our customers about it, they like it quite a bit. So that’s been nice.
It feels like regulators are trying to solve the problem at the wrong end. Whenever you hear about an antitrust ruling, it's "bundling". IE was the same, now this.

In my opinion, the problem is when a company is happy to eat the losses for a while, in hopes of killing competition and then raising the price when they are alone in the market. Clouds, ride hailing apps... It's fine to price your product at "zero", as long as you hold that price after you become a monopoly.

The problem for regulators is they can't force a price, nor judge on all the externalities that are included in it.
You joke but that would go so hard. Like DJ Roomba from Parks and Rec.
I don't think Twitter even lets you scroll at all, these days.

Anyway, "HN yells at cloud" was a fairly predictable low value comment. No, that's not what I mean. I mean "pretty apt" insofar as pagination would add no value. The order and count are changing so rapidly that infinite scroll is the obvious choice.
They are I've been asked about several of them from beginners.
> Sure, they're great at PR and marketing themselves as "private" but they're just as bad as the rest of them.

Apple's $10B of ad revenue primarily comes from promoting apps within its App Store, similar to how grocery stores charge for premium shelf space or end-of-aisle displays. This is an in-store, first-party system where data collected is used exclusively within Apple's ecosystem to personalize the user experience. These ads aim to increase app visibility within the App Store, maintaining a controlled and private "first party" environment.

In contrast, Google’s $300B advertising ecosystem extends far beyond its own platforms, surveilling and tracking user behavior across millions of websites and even physical locations. Google integrates with 85% of credit card transactions in the U.S., creating extensive user profiles that feed into a global ad tech and data brokering network with thousands of data brokers. This system supports highly targeted ads that follow users across the internet and beyond, typically sending users to third-party sites and services.

The difference lies in the scope and method of data collection and usage: Apple’s approach is about, and data remains within, its ecosystem, while Google’s extends to pervasive cross-platform tracking and profiling.

> if Apple launches a "private personalized ad platform", the fanboys will be singing its praise

This is indeed likely, since as an example, Apple spends extra time and energy to prevent even themselves from getting data, such as how they break up your Apple Maps trips directions requests into anonymized segments, to avoid letting themselves capture users' full trips. Apple deliberately makes their own data use more difficult, and in some cases makes certain uses impossible for themselves, to serve users' privacy. When you look at Alphabet or Meta engineering, you see their schemes serve to give them the ad profile data, while making it inaccessible to competitors.

TL;DR:

For both ad platforms and privacy engineering, as the Gus Fring meme goes, these "are not the same".
As a VW EV owner (ID.4), I can attest to this. The software is a burning dumpster fire, usability is terrible, the most common workflows break or simply never work, the car forgets even basic settings like whether you want to charge to 80% or 100%, and even the bare basics like the windows going predictably up when you press both "up" buttons sometimes fail (race conditions, apparently). It's an absolute disgrace.

I think any other vendor's software is better than this.
Not sure they cache, at least not the SERPs. The SERPs vary by user, and even browser.

Open a private window in Chrome, FF and Edge. Go to Google. Enter the same search term and it's likely the SERPs will be different.
Worth noting that while Hypercard was the glue which held everything together, most of Myst's functionality was implemented in native plugins. (or at least that's what Robyn and Rand told me when I chatted with them at a MacWorld Expo around its release). Their earlier games (The Manhole, Cosmic Osmo, etc) had been much more pure-Hypercard affairs.

Interestingly, for Riven (Myst's sequel) they were still using Hypercard to author the game, but the game no longer ran through Hypercard; instead, it ran on a custom C++ engine which ran on the data files output by the Hypercard authoring tools.
Moreover, they gave up on their opensource Community Edition:

https://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?t=14667
Within the EU at least, "sin taxes" work well for this because carrying them across the border for personal consumption is the only legal workaround. For most other things, if they're notably cheaper in another EU country, I can just order it from that EU country.

For example, I'm in Ireland (relatively HCOL), and I regularly visit Slovakia (relatively LCOL). When I used to smoke, it was 3.30/pack in Slovakia and 12.50/pack in Ireland. I could legally bring 40 packs back with me, so €368 to be saved - back then that would not only cover flights, but also a couple of nights in a half-decent hotel. (sunken-cost assumed, obviously).

But to compare, for example, an m3pro macbook pro, the difference is €100 - at which point you're really only juggling the difference between 23% and 20% VAT rates.

Outside of europe the gloves come off. Brazil, for example, has famously high import duties - so smuggling the same macbook to Brazil would have a much greater pay-off.
Because a tablet is a subset to smartphones? Just carry a smartphone and a laptop.
As far as we can tell, GR implies, and we have measured, space-time is completely continuous. Draw a square on a piece of paper; or, better yet, outline a cube with some sticks: within that square (or cube) is an infinite set of points of either the integral or real cardinality — whichever you’d like.

The “no physical infinity” thing sounds like a very Greek sort of axiom — like their “nature abhors a vacuum” thing, etc.
Nope, I didn't search either. I just want to do it. (Hi John)
Feel super similar to this. Was happy to read some nice little details of the early days on this article :D

never quite managed to play sponsored, because the guys I was playing with at the time required me to be 18 to travel alone :') so they booted me once they went professional - they became the first cs team of SK iirc.

Like you, it taught me a lot about being in a team, not so much as a leader but a part of it. Playing on eachothers strengths, and compensating for eachothers weaknesses naturally at some point etc. was also a bit of a recluse/distant to ppl locally, not an immigrant, but just a bad place to be outside as a kid :).

Nice to read other people have had similar experience ^^ never really met anyone IRL which was such a CS addict :D
Quiet thin article. 12% speedup on default (-6 ?) compression is not much. Will be nice to see what it brings for max compression.
I mostly agree worth you, except to nuance that it is not about "information that is classified in the US", but about classified US-documents.
No thanks

The original Raspberry announcement about Raspberry Pi Connect

> All devices get remote shell out-of-the-box, and if you use a Wayland compositor, such as Wayfire, you can also share your screen. In practice, this means you can use screen sharing with Raspberry Pi 4 and later models, and remote shell with all models of Raspberry Pi, even the oldest.

Now I have another task to purge this out of my pi.
A. K. Dewdney did a Computer Recreations on this -

"A matter fabricator provides matter for thought" on the hub - DOI:10.2307/24987222 ( https://www.jstor.org/stable/24987222 ) [Early April 1989]

It made quite an impression as a kid. Even 30 years later I think about it every now and again.
Yeah it does, not sure why are we talking about that though. It's a complete misrepresentation of the situation.

Let's take Google services as an example. I'm no fan of Google but their integrated search/Maps/PoI/hotels/directions/flight tickets experience was perfect, my workflow depends on it a lot. Now I can't use it without a US VPN, the only thing I get without it are some useless web search results and a small picture of a map that doesn't show anything interesting and doesn't do anything on click.

Not going "back" BTW, I was born in EU. And of course, it's really not just about the online services. Land costs absurd money, wages are absurdly low, energy strategy is completely idiotic and thus energy prices are absurd, business administration is unnecessarily hard, regulations are hard to understand and navigate, and so on. I don't want to live in an environment where a bunch of ideologists chosen by people out of my own state fight my life at every step. Wanna bet when they try to pass Chat Control again? Why am I required to own a Google/Apple controlled device to do basically anything, like register a car or pay taxes?
Both US and EU blame China of dumping practices, but at the same time Microsoft is doing the exact same thing.
Please spend a sentence or two explaining the server side filtering mechanism and linking to documentation! I would like to know the conditions required for streaming queries! From the sibling comment and a search of the docs it seems like this is a Parquet only feature, which seems pretty important to note!
I can imagine you might want news about facebook.

You might also be looking for third parties commenting on the trustworthyness or not of facebook as a service/company.

You might be after investing info in meta.

You might want to install their app

you might want help logging in or a guide to setting up an account.

I'd consider all of the above relevant enough to be worthy of a position on the results page.
YouTube's search is the worst. It's basically "here's 3 videos potentially related to what you're searching for and here's another 50 completely unrelated videos".
Are there no auto manufacturers with ok software?

The only in house auto software people don't seem to completely hate is Tesla.
> I'm not asking that it ensures that the line after the error executes, I'm asking that it not be eliminated.

I'm not sure what 'eliminated' even mean here. If the pointed to object has been replaced by a register, there might not even be a pointer to check. I.e. there might not be any meaningful code the compiler could generate for the line.

Compiler transformations attempt to preserve semantics of the code, do not attempt a faithful line-by-line translation (beyond toy compilers). If there is no semantic for a line, how can the compiler translate it?

Consider this code:

static inline int * get_x(void* ctx) { return (int*)ctx; }
static inline int indirect( int*(*getter)(void*), void*ctx) {
int * ptr = getter(ctx);
if(!ptr) { return 0; } // 1
return *ptr;
}

int main() {
int x = 10;
return indirect(get_x, &x);
}

After optimization, the code can be (and indeed is: https://godbolt.org/z/5vb9PdnYs) transformed to a simple "return 10". There is no meaningful translation for the line at [1] as there isn't actually any pointer or memory location the pointer could be pointing to in the translated program.

It doesn't even make sense to warn, as main, get_x and indirect could be in completely independent libraries and each make sense as written on its own (getter+ctx is just an hand built closure, so the code is far from non-realistic).
The EU obviously does have a tech industry.

There's a difference between having global-scale hyper-corporations based in the EU and having an industry, and conflating the two is a silly thing to do.
Facebook dot com.

Facebook article on Wikipedia.

Perhaps an entry for the movie as well.

Maybe some information on the stock.

I think a single result would be wrong.
For me it was: WOW ... the internet before the internet ... we were kids who'd grown up programming Basic on BBC Micro's in school! (or Basic on Atari 800xl's at home!)

I remember it being called object oriented programming, and putting things together like jigsaw puzzles.
for Apple OS
Sounds like a simple user script, found one after some searching: https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/401345-force-redirect-mobi...
I used to be 280 pounds (127kg). My BMI was 38 and I was in horrible shape. People told me I needed to go to the gym, take up running, etc. - and that advice, while well-meaning, was mostly bad.

For me, what I needed was to swim and bike more. I loved those things. Running hurt and was miserable. Weight lifting was horrible. Team sports were a misery.

But I could happily bike (on a recumbent in particular) for ages, at my own pace.

When I sold my car, started riding a bike everywhere, and started a volumetric diet (don't eat tiny meals, eat big ones of low-calorie-density foods) I dropped to about 200 pounds.

And I stayed there for a long time (over a decade) until I moved somewhere I could do this even better - the Netherlands - and I've lost another 20 pounds. And I just ride my bike around. I don't go to a gym (I do get a swim in a couple times a month though).

Riding my bike in suburban California was, indeed, torture, but only because it's a horribly-designed place. In nice places it's a delight.
> Yet, I know no consequences that would be measurable in physics

One can build a physical device modeled off of a Turing machine that enumerates all proofs within ZFC. The machine halts if an inconsistency is discovered, and runs forever if not. Now a prediction can be made about a process in the physical universe whose outcome depends on the axiom of choice.

I’m not trying to sound facetious actually. Highly abstract mathematics plays a critical role in inductive inference (in the sense of speeding up universal search by mapping a search over program space to a search over proofs in formal systems). This appears to be the direction some recent ML research is heading, so it wouldn’t surprise me if a lot of “unphysical” axioms end influencing our ability to efficiently approximate Solomonoff induction.
Day-ahead power price spreads soar as markets decouple on technical issue
Agree with you, that's why my thought was that, if they were to do anything, an acquisition in which VW retains their autonomy and leadership would make more sense than one in which the two executive teams merge and attempt to manage the new dual-culture single company.
seems like a startup opportunity - start with a well-defined subset of consumers where you can beat FICO in accuracy, then expand out. Don't compete on price, win on detail and quality.
You first split the sphere into an uncountable number of subsets, then group these into a finite number of subsets, whose measure sum to twice the measure of the original set.

(Un)countability is at the core of most of the counterintuitive results of measure theory, exactly because of the the third property of measure.
Good for you. But this is not about you.

I feel the same, but this is not about me.

For people who read this and don't exercise, may not feel it enjoyable, it's often uphill all the time. They don't like exercise. Maybe being just thin and losing weight would be better, or doing non-vigorous exercise. We don't have much information. We make stories going off the tangent on some studies.
I think I'm on the side of "use tools to speed up your work, once you actually know how the work ought to be done."

Calculators spit out wrong answers all the time, it's just due to user error, like fat-fingering an operation button or adding a zero somewhere. It's easy to tell when that happens if you understand how it should work, because you're not just using the output blindly.

Same idea with AI tools. It's important that you already know what the output should be, at least well enough to notice when it's wrong. But you probably don't need to type out every line of code and deal with your typos and whatever.
Chargie – overnight battery charging limiter for phones
> Then start a business and do it.

Why? Why would I start a business where there is no market? We've gone over this. It's not a technical and/or solution issue. It's that the gate keepers - the ones who would but the product - don't want something that's good for consumers but bad for them.

I can't explain it aby other way.
The problem here is that governments are really bad at building functional and cost-effective software 99% of the time and 99% of FOSS developers are always starved of resources.
Sure, and you’re right in plenty of cases. But likewise if your day to day is hard, stressful and has a decent amount of worry then once you’ve got the kids to bed at 8:30 the will power required to do some exercise is monumental. Quite frankly their will power points are gone for the day.

So, instead try to find a way to squeeze exercise in as part of daily life (essentially habit stacking)
> Sure, it says "X million results"

Google also removed that few months ago.
We were still using OS/2 for some stuff in the early 2000s. The ATMs ran on it.
Good news for both companies. I'm a bit surprised, because I thought VW would be pissed at Rivian that the R3 basically looks like a 1991 VW Golf[1] Country[2].

[1]: VW Rabbit for the North Americans

[2]: https://www.flickr.com/photos/harry_nl/49087163666
There is still room for a bit of whimsy in computing. Anything to combat the flood of doom is welcome.
What Is Self Hosted? What Is a Stack?
> Yet another reason to hate consoles.

Seems more like a reason to hate Microsoft. They’re the ones shoving ads in everything they do.
Anyone doing heavy lifting and low-level tooling will be better to optimise for specialised training and inference engines. Usage will depend on where the abstraction layer is - if you want to see CUDA, then you'll need Nvidia. If all you care for is the size of the model and you know it's very large, then the Apple hardware becomes competitive.

Besides, you'd be well served with a Mac as a development desktop anyway.
Unless you are fine letting old homebrew work its "magic" - the installation is too lengthy and involved for a new language. It should just be click, download:

https://elixir-lang.org/install.html

That is the biggest gotcha for me. There doesn't seem to be a simple installer or binary you just get up and running unlike other major languages. Is it a distribution issue with erlang or something? I'd have thought it'd be easy to package it up.
macOS I assume?
I use a little app called noTunes (it's on github) to prevent that from happening.

edit: should be this one: https://github.com/tombonez/noTunes
They are not "pointless" by definition, as every new regulation increases safety, costs, and time. They do have an impact (for better or worse). haha

That said, it's wrong to start from the assumption that because they exist, they are necessary. First, we need to define what "safe" means. And a safety threshold that is a fair trade-off between public acceptance and the industrial feasibility of the sector.

One might think, sure, increasing safety is always necessary. But we must accept the fact that zero risk does not exist in any technology and will never be completely eliminated in any way. And we already accept the risks of dams and renewables, so it means that a threshold of what is accepted as safe exists, and we can define it.

It seems universally accepted that renewables are "safe." So why not take the deaths per GWh produced and use this value to define a nuclear power plant as safe?

On page 175 (chapter 3.5) of this report compiled by the European Union research center, it shows how third-generation EPRs are already several orders of magnitude safer than renewables, per GWh produced. Demonstrating how they are infinitely safer than any other energy source.
https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC1...

Therefore, if we decide to define renewables as safe, we can deduce that modern nuclear power plants are very safe. Yet why is this not perceived?

Obviously, the answer is very simple, the death from installing a panel is an isolated case often limited to a single individual, and often does not make the news. Nuclear, however, even if it causes one death (like Fukushima), is discussed for decades. Besides, the dangers related to the dispersal of radioactive material often cause even more fear than the deaths from the plants themselves, despite rarely having caused tangible damage.

With this said, it's important to note that this fear does not find reflection in the numbers, which remain the reading closest to the reality of the facts.

Finally, from my point of view, even if nuclear were less safe than this, it would still help fight climate change, which should lead to millions of millions of deaths, if not billions. It would be a very logical intellectual step to accept the risks even of a less safe nuclear (and cheaper), because the long-term benefits would definitely be beneficial.
Hard to let your kids play outside when there's 2500kg Dodge Rams going 80kph in the streets.
Yup. I dislike Uber for the way they treat their drivers but I dislike the old taxis even more for the way they treat me.
The order should not be changing - that’s another user-hostile invention designed to encourage doomscrolling. Increasing count is a non-issue because once you reach a content piece you saw previously you know where you are (same as any bulletin board).