skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sure but we're talking about personal/hobby pages made by people who are overwhelmingly not artists and designers.
Agreed.

Adding black boxes on top of black boxes is not a good way to abstract complexity. Helm does nothing more than any template engine does, yet requires me to trust not only the competency of some random chart author but also that they will correctly account for how my k8s environment is configured.

When I inevitably have to debug some deployment, now I'm digging through not only the raw k8s config, but also whatever complexity Helm has added on to obfuscate that k8s config complexity.

Helm is an illusion. All it does is hide important details from you.
Intel's New FinFET Suggests Foundry Service Provider Plans
> their "self driving" feature is horribly lagging behind most other makers (constant phantom braking still a recurring problem after years and years, no proper automatic overtaking, inferior speed control and speed limit enforcement, etc)

Who are these makers that allegedly outclass Autopilot/FSD?
Mattermost is way better than Discord or even slack, for this type of communications.
Yes, the economic problem of reward absence is exclusive to open source and private software does not have it. They may have others, like excess of rewards to hackers in form of crypto ransom to the point that the defense department had to step in and ban payouts.
Ive been pretty hesitant to share without a solid prototype or even a solid model on paper. I can write about my thought process I suppose.
> I think proper programming language support is the way to go.

Personally, I would prefer a SQLite database. Ok I'll show myself out.
Related: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40792684

It's clear that they had absolutely no plan to deal with a compromised key. When approached, they probably have been trying to figure out the issue, are simply stuck in an unfixable state because they keys can't be rotated reliably.

Now that the issue is publicly known, they can't run their devices safely anymore.

I am willing to bet that you don't need their "codebase" as the Rabbitude hackers used, I bet these keys are hardcoded into the devices themselves, and that the key could probably be known within an hour or so and used to wreak havok.

So they opted to brick every R1, likely requiring a recovery on a PC using USB, and they need to work out their API key issue before they can ship anything, because there's a chance that any update would get compromised immediately too.

I hope every aspect of this grift is studied thoroughly so that investors understand not to throw money at people this unserious anymore.
NanoLED will most likely replace OLED in the future.
yet.
.... this inevitably summons qdot.
We're not talking about sending a single person, so I don't know where the solitary confinement comment comes from.

A colonized galaxy will have people mostly living in artificial habitats. A starship of sufficient size is just an artificial habitat moving at high speed.

One would get around the issues you discuss by just sending multiple vehicles. And anyway, this is in rebuttal to the idea that intergalactic colonization is impossible. The onus on that argument is to show it can't work, not argue there are obstacles that would make it uncertain in any particular case.
It's literally a h264 stream (in case of carplay) and PCM audio. How did they manage to fuck that up?
In my day job, I build things in a web context. I recently started working on a side-project that wasn’t web-based, and it really re-enforced how tiring it is to work with most web technologies where you want some sort of server-side functionality as well as a UX that only something JS-‘enabled’ can provide.
> Just saying that there’s magic out there that’s not technological.

Dark magic too, I've been on one too many rides where the driver insists on monologuing on topics that range from detestable (politics) to alarming (the driver was armed, and had picked me up from the airport)
> The "kids in cages" during the Obama administration came across the border unaccompanied, the Trump policy was to separate families and then not tell the families where their kids were.

Right, under Trump the kids were being used as pawns to get unknown non family members into the US hence the DNA testing and subsequent separation. There was a large influx of children being trafficked and abused in such manner.

Biden ended Trump unaccompanied minor law and stopped rapid DNA testing.

https://www.newsweek.com/joe-bidens-reversal-trumps-border-b...

https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-detention-child-migrants

https://www.fairus.org/legislation/executive/biden-administr...
A New Way to Predict Earthquakes
> But not to increase cache hit rate (what CDNs were originally intended for)

Was it really cache hit rate of the client or cache hit rate against the backend?
Same down here in the Colorado resort towns. If you don’t wheel or tow a camper I imagine it’ll do whatever else you want.

But still I’ve yet to see one with a sled deck or a tailgate pad though so I assume it’s just people who don’t really need a truck at all.

I think they’re just for putzing around town. There’s not much options for chargers, and towns and destinations are far apart. I imagine that’s even more true in Wyoming.
Seeing direct value to customers instead of being "forced" into features/bugs by management whose only goal is to measure Jira story points, OKRs and measurement of work to stack rank people.

I want to spend time working for the customers, not for bosses who don't care about customers.
Thank you for summarizing (I actually read the whole article before seeing your reply and might have posted similar thoughts). I get the appeal of romanticizing our past as a country, looking back at the post-war era, especially the space race with a nostalgia that makes us imagine it was a world where the most competent were at the helm. But it just wasn't so, and still isn't.

Many don't understand that the Civil Rights Act describes the systematic LACK of a meritocracy. It defines the ways in which merit has been ignored (gender, race, class, etc) and demands that merit be the criteria for success -- and absent the ability for an institution to decide on the merits it provides a (surely imperfect) framework to force them to do so. The necessity of the CRA then and now, is the evidence of absence of a system driven on merit.

I want my country to keep striving for a system of merit but we've got nearly as much distance to close on it now as we did then.
Energy could be beamed across interstellar distances. It just requires larger apertures than for beaming it across shorter distances.

The best way to extract detailed information about a star system is to colonize it. Remote sensing only goes so far.
Sounds like Lisp was made for you. ;D (Cuz the codebase eventually becomes something only you can understand.)
EPEX "Technical issue" causes enormous raise in German energy prices
This company is not being sued.

This is a standard letter that Sony has been sending to AI companies as a result of a new AI data mining opt out in the EU Ai Act.

https://completemusicupdate.com/sony-music-tells-700-ai-comp...
It's not built into Windows, but I just learned that there's a 3rd party GUI that aggregates packages from winget, chocolatey, and other sources.

https://github.com/marticliment/WingetUI
Sonoma-only, unfortunately.
In theory the electromagnets controlling the vertical and horizontal sweep of the electron beam should react instantly to the incoming sync signals but in practice it's much more complicated (because the magnetic fields store energy which you need to deal with somehow). Bob Anderson has an entry in his series on the general process of restoring vintage televisions which goes in depth on the topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HdEfo8jS3FI&list=PL4aHiwoXvL...
Data breaches and leaks involving personal data is always bad.
I have long hated infinite scroll, but was never really able to articulate why beyond "I don't like it." Much of what you said resonates with me, though.

I do know that I avoid websites that use it, regardless of why.
Show HN: Hyparquet 1.0 – Apache Parquet Parser for the Browser
I started 6 months ago when I wanted to look inside datasets from Hugging Face. I was not satisfied with existing libraries. So, naturally, I built my own library from scratch.

Parquet is a very complicated format. It has 22 data types, 9 encodings, 8 compression codecs. Previous parquet js libraries went abandoned due to the complexity. However, I can confidently say that Hyparquet is now the most conformant parquet parser in existence. It can open more files than PyArrow and DuckDB. I dare you to find a file that Hyparquet can’t open!

In addition to supporting all the parquet files, Hyparquet supports efficient streaming of parquet data over the network, even cross-domain using CORS. This means you can stream files straight from S3 with no backend.

Hyparquet is open-source MIT licensed.

You can launch a local parquet file viewer by running "npx hyperparam"
America? There are many Amish enclaves here. There is no "the" Amish country.

I shop at an Amish grocery store. Lots of us "English" do. It's worth dealing with the curt, standoff-ish service for good food at reasonable prices.
As much as I think big tech sometimes abuses their power and leverage unfair advantages we shouldn’t stifle innovation by requiring everything to be totally open from the get go.
If there’s zero switching costs to go to a competitor then what’s the incentives for companies to spent a lot of money and time building a product? It’d be very risky (especially for small players actually) and they’ll have to do “safe” incremental functionality until they have a larger user base and can afford to invest in R&D because it’s less likely many of their users will leave all at once. It’s the same reason why we have patents for things - to incentivise the investment in R&D. Maybe there could be a threshold for time+revenue+users that trigger the need for openness? Same should be true for social networks and when we can/should set a higher bar for holding them responsible for abuse on their platform I feel.
Was the key also able to be used to generate text to speech?
Reportedly only some hundreds of millions. The makers of that stupid AI Pin that you strap onto your chest and that catches on fire was trying to sell itself to Hewlett-Packard for $1 billion.
Australia has the "Cult of the Tradies" (builders/plumbers etc).

The starting salary of a qualified builder is AUD 125,000 (USD 83,000) and most earn much higher than that. If working in mining even non-skilled labourers are earning more than AUD 150,000 (FIFO).

Builders are charging AUD 1000 per day per person.
but.. file systems
In my experience, the majority of behaviour you actually want to use is implementation defined as opposed to UB.
Lucid is posed to become the Apple of Electric cars
What a ridiculous thing to say. If you ran, or were part of, an academically run project, "you'd get mad" if a huge industry player went "hey we did some stuff with your project, some of it might be interesting to you, want to chat about potential upstreaming?"

really, dude?
Oh man does this ever resonate. Thanks for sharing it; it’s a common story, usually met with a cacophony of victim blaming.
> The company doesn't need to expose custom APIs on their data. If they implement a chat protocol, they must allow other clients to interface with it.

And how would that work without a way to talk to the company’s chat server, and document the way to do that, and commit to keeping that way of communicating reasonably stable? In other words, an API?

Which implies sort of a commitment to the way that chat protocol works, maybe even before the company knows how that looks like. Modern development methodology, that is, working in sprints and iterating towards a local maximum, doesn’t really go well with an API that’s required to work pretty much stable from day one. So when would the point in time be where you’d be required to open up to other clients?
China as far I'm aware doesn't have any solid plans on the books yet. NASA has been working on planning out a Mars sample return for a few years now, part of the Perseverance rover's job is to collect samples, store them in canisters, and drop them for future retrieval. This ensures that the samples have a much lower risk of having been contaminated, if, say, they end up being retrieved by a crewed mission.

The issue has been that previous proposals have all been too complex and too expensive, eg, a second rover that has to retrieve the samples and then place them on a lander which has a rocket on-board, the rocket then launches back into orbit, where an orbiter picks up it up and brings it home.

They've recently started soliciting other ideas for a way it might be done from private industry. The most promising in my opinion being to use a Starship, so they would be able to send a large enough return rocket to not need an orbital rendezvous, significantly simplifying things. I doubt they're seriously proposing a crewed Starship sample retrieval just yet. Another neat proposal I've heard is to build on the success of the Ingenuity helicopter to have a bunch of similar helicopters go around picking up the samples instead of a rover.
86F for us backwards americans.

I set the A/C thermostat at 86F in the summer, in West TN.

Strip off some clothes and drink more water. it helps.
For who? The grifters who are about to get sued into bankruptcy, or the hipsters who bought into the snake oil and are now out $199?

I would rate this as a "well, anyway...".
Adding userId, clientId, sessionId, and requestId to every log line and every event in the data warehouse is one of those „one weird tricks“ that actually does improve your life.
I would be astonished (but pleased) if investors started asking difficult questions about key management processes.
Will definitely try this. YouTube Kids is just awful. It’s way too hard to manage what kids are watching, and somehow it’s very different if you give them a kids profile on your own account vs making a kids account with their own email.

There’s so much good stuff on YouTube, but also an endless ocean of what can only be described as cocaine for kids.
You seem to still not be getting it. Here’s the original online document:

> 1. Please delete line 3.

> 2. Blank line

> 3. This is line 3

> 4. This is line 4.

User 1 is accessing the document offline, sees the instruction on line 1 and changes their local copy to:

> 1. Please delete line 3

> 2. Blank line

> 3. This is line 4

User 2 concurrently changes the document to update the instruction:

> 1. Please delete line 4

> 2. Blank line

> 3. This is line 3

> 4. This is line 4

When user 1 & user 2 merge their documents, they’ll get:

> 1. Please delete line 4

> 2. Blank line

> 3. This is line 4

You can also split this into two documents with a similar effect (one contains instructions, the other contents). The point is that it’s not about how changes are represented. It’s that the logical and semantic structure isn’t represented in the CRDT and thus while some eventually consistent result is attained by all nodes, the logical and semantic structure may end up broken. That’s why you generally don’t see CRDTs for code editors - the merge conflicts still need to be resolved by hand and doing it automatically can result in worse and harder to understand results than normal.
So for every crime by one state, he has to publish one from another state for balance? Is it not enough that one state committed a crime and he reported it?
Yeah, sounds like overwhelming positive opinions...

JULIAN!! The guy that embarrassed evil powers all over the world!

What evil powers? Well, the US, the US, and... the US.

I got down-voted by just mentioning he didn't release anything significant on Russia for some reason.

I wouldn't be surprise if some of the massive support we're seeing here in this thread is not completely legit.
Sure, but then youre still on the.side.of NVIDIA because you jave the.budget.
Popular Obesity Drugs Show the Divide Between 'The Haves and the Have-Nots'
Lepiter is a Pharo-based notetaking app within the Glamorous Toolkit. I'm not sure it's mature enough to compete with Obsidian/etc., but it does allow linked and embedded code like you were thinking.

https://lepiter.io/feenk/introducing-lepiter--knowledge-mana...
You were on the right path when you called a vault “one more layer of redirection.” A vault on its own won’t dramatically improve your security posture. Neither will a .env file.

Instead, they both beat the alternative (which is writing secrets and environmental config directly in the source code). And they’re both part of defending in depth.

Defense in depth is hard to explain to a five year old, so think of candy. You’re five and you’re obsessed with candy. If I don’t want you to eat pounds of it every single day, I’ll likely do different things to stop you.

1.) I’ll give you a reasonable amount of candy.

2.) I’ll explain that if you eat too much candy, you’ll face health consequences like tooth decay or childhood obesity.

3.) I’ll put the candy somewhere both out of sight and out of reach.

Software security is like that too. Instead of relying upon just one method, you’ll do a number of different things. On their own, few of them are really very useful. But when you combine them all together, you can end up with a reasonably secure system.

In the case of vaults, it’s just a slightly safer tradeoff with its own problems. We’ve already established that it’s bad to write secrets and environmental configuration info in source code. One way around that is to put secrets in a .env file but then distributing that file becomes the weak link. Maybe you Slack them around, or email them or maybe you write all the secrets on a whiteboard in your office? A vault has a lot of flaws, but it’s better than writing them on a whiteboard. In some threat models, it’s better than Slack or email.

It adds depth but it’s far from perfect.
Perhaps. I view it as the squalor of an entirely unsophisticated market. Large organizations build and deploy sites on technologies with ramifications they hardly understand or care about because there is no financial benefit for them to do so, because the end user lacks the same sophistication, and is in no position to change the economic outcomes.

So an entire industry of bad middleware created from glued together mostly open source code and abandoned is allowed to even credibly exist in the first place. That these people are hijacking your browser sessions rather than selling your data is a small distinction against the scope of the larger problem.
Towards Universal Keybindings
Have you tried the rendered manifests pattern ? https://akuity.io/blog/the-rendered-manifests-pattern/
In a way, it's returning to Google's roots. Before the public cloud became a thing, more of their stack was proprietary. (And without having contracts with customers, there was more churn.)

It still worked out fine for Google, though.
would be great to have Rust bindings so it could work with Tauri. With tauri growth and the upcoming mobile devices support coupled with SQLite recent hype, this could bridge the gap and solve many problems for offline-first apps, thus become the go to solutions for many dev shops.
Not sure about them being lighter. The vast majority of the weight of a CRT was the thick glass on the front. CRTs that claimed to be "flat" used very thick glass that was curved like a lens so that the front the viewer saw was flat. The larger the screen, the thicker the glass would need to be to keep the edges/corners from bowing. That glass was very heavy. The 32" 16x9 broadcast Sony monitor we had was extremely heavy and required two people at a minimum to carry/place it.
I’ve seen a Waymo stop and pick up a rider at Octavia and Linden. If you look at a map, you can see that it’s totally blocking all traffic.

Double parking is legal (in some cases) in California, but this wouldn’t be allowed under any reasonable interpretation.

I’ve also seen Waymos double parked on both sides of the street, which blocks other cars from going around them.
>Trucks are expensive and VW has never tried to compete at the absolute low end.

Tell that to the rabbit pickup
Mate, this is the comment that they were directly replying to :

> At best unproven and denied.
Because Uber operates is many countries.
How does llama’s answers compare to answers from gpt4?
I think it's more a case of "well we already have Teams why do you need Slack?"
Very cool to see a use of tuple-database in the wild! I've known about that project for a while and thought it looked really cool, but I don't have a use for it.

What's the reason for the fork?
Interesting. Would you accept remote work as default for most non-customer facing jobs to lower the strain on roads ( calming measure )?
>Here in Michigan we have been trying to find a use for sugar beet waste for over forty years.

In India and other countries where sugarcane is grown, people use bagasse (a byproduct of crushing sugarcane for making sugar) for various purposes.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bagasse
They have a work that shows melting polar ice, but I wonder how energy efficient it is (I expect it does not consume energy when nothing flips, but still ...)
Better call my man... Kalman.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalman_filter

For distance during landing I would be thinking a spatially maximally distributed array of quartz-shielded, thermally-supported laser TOF sensors along nominal extremities, but that's just because they're familiar to me, small, power-efficient, highly linear, relatively accurate, and cheap. Unsure if the IC physics assumptions work in non-atmospheric conditions. Perhaps the output can be re-scaled to obtain cheap and accurate enough readings.

A non-dilettante with an actual physics degree would clearly be desirable ;)
Azure Maia for the era of AI: From silicon to software to systems
Efficient language models as arithmetic circuits
"No sir, we have absolutely no idea why anyone would ever use an ad blocker."
> There was very little reason to put effort and resources in conducting an interview with Assange, since he would need to return to Sweden for a fair trial to be conducted.

The first excuse she gave was that it wasn't possible. She lied. You're making excuses for a liar who was called out on her lies before she tried to use that other excuse.

As to the second excuse, if that true, they wouldn't have eventually bothered, but they did, nor cited the passage of time before they could secure evidence as a reason for closing the rape investigation once they had finally conducted the interviews, but they did.

They failed to do their job, and they lied about it.

> Note how in the very next sentence you leave the door open to object to any trial on the grounds that it wasn't sufficiently fair.

That would apply to any trial, in any situation, with any accused. But somehow it seems to get people who try to defend the way the Assange case was handled very worked up.

> Assange's defenders cannot really be placated.

Only being prepared to accept a fair trial is not a high standard, and not one I'm willing to dispense with whomever the accused is. That this is even an issue is very telling about the attitudes involved.

> There's always some thing to be concerned about, some reason to believe Assange is being treated uniquely unfairly.

There "always is" because he's been subjected to gross human rights abuses. The attempt at using his character to justify that is nasty. The moment human rights are made conditional, they are not rights. Nobody should be treated this way.

To me, this case is very revealing. Assange isn't likeable to me. He may well have done awful things, whether or not they can be proven. I'm not arguing this because I like or support him. I'm arguing this because he has human rights like anyone else, whether or not he was guilty of rape, and whatever else he might have done or not.

This entire discussions disgusts me.
If the EU is working on a time machine, Lotus Notes might be their next target!
GM brings in new CEO to steer troubled Cruise