skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Your example about trains is actually incorrect, not just in that most trains are "basically" automated, but in that some (long-distance) have actually been for a long time.

>Its going to be far easier for Waymo to take their existing mastery of traffi

I'm going to stop you right there. The whole comparison is theoretical, and I just realized you don't even understand they are in entirely different markets and are trying to make a concrete point. FSD is for customers but Waymo isn't man. Good day
They do it because it makes more money. They've measured the amount of time spent (and ads served) to people with and without the feature, and they found that, averaged across the user base, the feature increases revenue. So everyone gets it.

At least, that's what every ad-supported platform thinks they're doing. There can be other factors, especially in large process-oriented companies like Google. Like, an ambitious PM wants to be able to point to a feature they added in their annual performance review, so they do some sloppy measurements to show that their dumb feature increases revenue even if the change is just noise. You can see why such a PM might not want there to be a way for people to disable the feature, since that metric could clearly show how unpopular it is.
Schotter – Georg Nees – Part 2 – Investigation
When does a long out of order delay look like a packet loss?

Is it possible for an out of order packet to get delayed by a millisecond? A second? A minute? An hour?

Have you written code to be robust to this?
What costs? Healthcare, schooling (including kindergarten) and transportation are free for kids. Only thing you need to do is feed them and buy them some clothes, and government already pays you money for that.
That just sounds like a butchered sentence/meaning to me.

I'd say the "cannot" refers more to "corporate policy won't allow anything other than shredding" rather than the rare earths have somehow turned sour and physically can't be re-used.
If you plan to hyperbole it, then say 1990. The plan is 2050.
> It's too bad that the thing Apple cares most about is retaining their monopoly position over the iOS ecosystem.

It's been always this way, wasn't it?

Back to the point: most people are clueless and just use what's on their phone. Unless Apple organizes a huge campaigns with outdoor banners and ads on TV and social media blaming the EU and asking people to intervene, very few people will even notice. I know this because my colleague works in a phone repair shop and people would regularly come with a Huawei phone saying something is wrong because they cannot install an app used by their friends. What's obvious to us is completely irrelevant for most other people.
There was a viral twitter/x thread recently that having membership system (like Costco) reduces entry of bad people in an institution.
If you never encountered this you never created your own ResponseWriter, or you did it and inadvertently broke its Flushing, Pushing and Hijacking capabilities. It’s not more complicated than this.
Just like anything else in design, the first question should be "how can I convey this most clearly to the audience I'm addressing" not "hmm, I wonder if there's are any problems the technique I chose because it's what everyone seems to use for this." Use the right tool for the job. There's even a good chance that juxtaposing these elements differently or adding another element could clear this up entirely.

This is why it's good to have a really competent visual designer around. Their sole purpose is visual communication, and that very much includes dealing with the subconscious connotations and unintended messages hidden within data visualizations. Yes, you've probably encountered designers that would not be good at that, you imagine. You've also probably encountered developers that would not be good at the sort of data munging that scientists, et al do; that doesn't mean developers, generally, aren't best equipped to handle the related coding problems.
I would love for my state to make all fees and tips included in the price like Europe. The price should be the price. Make asking for a tip illegal. Raise minimum wage for restaurant workers so they do not need the tip. Have a separate price for take away so that eating in includes a bit extra to cover the additional costs.

But alas, I live in a red state so it is never going to happen.
Even CSS is optional, a "semantic 2D HTML document" is enough. You will get a nice layout until the browser does handle a table level of even one depth (and you usually can manage with browsers flattening the table).

Navigation among those "semantic 2D HTML documents" was thought thru already: https://webaim.org/techniques/tables/

That should be enforced by regulation on "critical" (USA: utility?) online services.

It means many could develop reasonably an alternative _REAL-LIFE_ browser to interact with those online services (this is strategic control, and allows money to go where it is actually needed instead of those toxic web javascript abominations, and this word is fair, not nice, but _FAIR_).

If something has to replace noscript/basic (x)html, it should be as simple, or more simple, and as stable in time. It must be worth it: namely "cleaner".

We could compromise with something "javascript": I guess that would be a dynamic 2D RGB canvas with very basic and few drawing primitives (mostly vector based with a glyph renderer) and OS services (probably event based), but I don't believe anybody could come up with that thing and hold it stable and simple enough for much time before the toxic people get their way with it: embrace and extend until control is taken over or until it is unusable and destroyed if control take over failed.
Waymo rides in PHX area were a pleasent surprise. While on our trip, the waymo slammed it's brakes as a precarious event transpired that I'm almost positive if a human was at the wheel, would have resulted in an accident. Very optimistic to see how many lives they can save over the next decade.
If you have to do the dishes...
Yes they should only work for degrees at Trump University and citizenship should only be extended after they prove they can work for 4 years as unpaid interns at a Trump resort/casino.
Looks interesting. Seems low effort to implement. I will add it to my website.
This should at least be mentioned in your README:

> 1 GB of outbound data transfer from North America to all region destinations (excluding China and Australia) per month

Source: https://cloud.google.com/free/docs/free-cloud-features#compu...
Which you will absolutely not get past pretty much any middleboxes, unless you encapsulate it in UDP.
I'm aware of this proposal and it's really just as impractical. More detail [1].

[1]: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/star-treks-warp-d...
Boeing 787-9 to SFO turns back to LHR after windscreen "cracked at 40,000ft"
I don’t know of any studies of the scale but there are millions of bones and fragments in museum storage that will never see the light of day because there’s no one to study them, and that’s just the bones people bothered to collect and save.

Obviously thats out of trillions of animals and only a tiny fraction of animals get fossilized and plenty of species never left a record, but at the human scale, we have so many freaking fossils we have no idea what to do with them. We bring our kids out on field trips to dig for them and leave with dozens of bones per kid that are at least hundreds of thousands of year old, because no one bothers if they're <10My old otherwise.

I’m not arguing that the fossil record is any more than a minuscule sliver of all animals that have ever lived, but there are still a lot of them and there’s no doubt human civilization is leaving its own behind that will be detectable millions of years from now.
I'd assume in practice it would require a school to be accredited, because I think that's the kind of rule that the bureaucracy would instantly put into place, and that a president would never overrule because of the potential for bad press.and the fiddliness of it.

Accreditation isn't an enormous hurdle, but I've heard one or maybe two stories of schools shutting down because they couldn't make the bar.

The specific-degree requirement you suggest is probably for the best but may be politically a harder sell.
Many games are popular targets for griefers or DDOS attacks, not because the attacker gains anything of value from the attack (and many of them aren't actually hackers, they just download the tools written by others), but instead they do it solely for the perverse happiness they get from knowing that they ruined someone else's day / hour / minute.

Possibly you just haven't seen this problem yet because your game isn't high-profile enough for them to bother with and it doesn't provide enough amusement for them to get a kick out of it.
Duplicate: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40762845
Writing to process and reflect on loss naturally brings more vulnerability and introspection to one’s writing. I’m not sure that would carry over to all your subsequent work, though.
"System design from provably correct constructs" by James Martin, although he doesn't properly credit Hamilton in my opinion:

https://archive.org/details/systemdesignfrom00mart
Missing the obvious 710 - OIL
Plus, there were live examples of stuff flying around (birds).

I do not see anything going FTL anywhere right now.
I think the issue is that there's a stigma around UDP, largely borne from not using it effectively. I'm not sure this is the right way to address the stigma though.

Ultimately, TCP vs UDP per se is rarely the right question to ask. But that is often the only configuration knob available, or at least the only way to get away from TCP-based protocols and their overhead is to switch over to raw UDP as though it were an application protocol unto itself.

Such naive use of UDP contributes to the stigma. If you send a piece of data only once, there's a nontrivial chance it won't get to its destination. If you never do any verification that the other side is available, misconfiguration or infrastructure changes can lead to all your packets going to ground and the sender being completely unaware. I've seen this happen many times and of course the only solution (considered or even available in a pinch) is to ditch UDP and use TCP because at least the latter "works". You can say "well it's UDP, what did you expect?" but unfortunately while that may have been meant to spur some deeper thought, it often just leads to the person who hears it writing off UDP entirely.

Robust protocol design takes time and effort regardless of transport protocol chosen, but a lot of developers give it short shrift. Lacking care or deeper understanding, they blame UDP and eschew its use even when somebody comes along who does know how to use it effectively.
The @amelius sibling has nice links to "graphics" choices, but I feel like the overall topic of the original article and this comment thread is more about the interaction of that with "statistical choices" as per my other comment (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40766618) pointing to plots you might like to peruse.

For example, though the final example in the reference there is graphically "only" shading the "outer band" darker than the inner alpha-blended region, this seems important statistically/visualization-wise since the unknown true parent distribution/ensemble samples are, well, sampled from need only be any monotonic curve within the whole region.. (not even differentiable if mixed discrete-continuous values may happen).
In the linked area directly below the title
I am using AI to drop hats outside my window onto New Yorkers
Encryption without authentication is rather useless. Just slows things down for no advantage.
Sorry, cannot answer these questions competently. From my understanding, LG has monopoly on TV-scale OLED displays, so others big players in premium TV market (Sony and Samsung come to mind) bet on productizing uLED.
How did they end up out of alphabetical order? It might be worth alphabetizing and collecting singular+plural into single entries; s and es are available, so you can pluralize most nouns (or singularize most verbs). The list has some pairs but not all, for no particular reason.

I’d suggest dropping the capitalization too, it adds duplicates, and can often be used in both senses, e.g., bill, bell, hill, hiss…

Also note there are plenty of nouns here that can be used as verbs and verbs than can be used as nouns.
Art Turing test: Exploration of perceptions of generated and man-made art
Shipping and handling costs can vary widely with the number of items purchased. If I buy one shoe lace or three, the shipping costs are going to be the same... so if you price shipping into the item price, folks buying three pairs of shoe laces will pay excess shipping from folks buying one pair of shoe laces.
My Impressions of ReScript
> Napoleon’s misconception was his belief that if he once set foot on a British ship he not only secured ‘the protection of the law of Britain’

Interesting. Britain has parliamentary sovereignty, so there's no protection from parliament _at all_ under the law (then and now), and parliament are well within their rights to pass a bill of attainder which is a new law essentially punishing a specific person or group.

In this case, he was seeking protection from the government on the (surprisingly reasonable!) basis that parliament itself might be sufficiently sympathetic to him to not simply lop off his head.
I'm ruing that we have 1938 in both languages, but 1937 only in english translation (although I have every reason to believe that translation has, when choosing between fidelity and beauty, opted for the former), and I don't believe 1937 and 1938 are the same composition (or at least if 1938 is an expanded 1937 it also clearly has deletions).

[traditional vs simplified is not an issue here, although I note that 丑 (note there are sibboleths even in the simplified strokes!) as simplified 醜 loses a potential flight of fancy: does the existence of unitary ghosts imply that subghosts and ghost-quotients are two different structures (in general: for abelian hauntings they coincide?), for the latter may be non-unital? This would have important repercussions for the kernels of mappings between ghosts...]
That would have been Autoroute. Written in the UK, the software house, Nextbase, was bought by Microsoft in 1993/94 and the Psion release was called "Microsoft Automap" - the only Microsoft release for that platform!
Can you hear your own thoughts when thinking in sentences? If not what does thinking a sentence through feel like?
> why not try sports?

Being good at athletics requires specific good genetics.

> acquiring intellectual territory

Analytical intellect is not a valued trait in the current society. It will not increase your status in most cases. It actively works against you in certain social structures. Unless your intellectual territory grants you significant material benefits, there's no use out of it.
Took me a minute to figure out why some had decimal points.
There are those people that did great things that you just never heard about in school history:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav_Petrov
Merlin Labs aims to test an AI-powered KC-135 within a year
"Disturbance of the peace" indeed
Not just teenagers and homeless people, but anyone around. Its more about the volume than the type of music played. They used to do the same thing at the train station. It’s very annoying, but it works.
Por que no los dos? Plug into the MIC, get into politics, get into constant "police actions", scratch other's politician's backs, and make bank.

War is good business. Political power is absolutely something worth being bought/sought. Long as that is the case, the power hungry gonna seek power to wield, and they'll wield it to to their own ends; and realistically, once they're locked in as having it, it isn't for you or anyone else ultimately.
Thanks. So after your corrected energy estimate and more reasonable assumptions it appeaars that the clickbaity title of the article is off by more than 7 orders of magnitude. With the upcoming NVidia inference chips later this year it will be off by another log unit. It is hard for biomatter to compete with electrons in silicon and copper.
A smart contract anyone can drain once people stop sending it money
Agreed, however with children we don't have full understanding of nature vs nurture (Will we ever?)
I was hoping this would be a digital nomad program :-/
I used to do tech support before remote desktop became easy. When talking people though screens I had to do a lot of visualization of what I thought they were seeing so I could explain what to do next. Was it like a dream? Sometimes pretty close but just a computer screen.
While laying in bed with fever I realised it's much more easier to imagine moving things than static ones. Imagine red apple? To hell that, my apple gonna spin and rotate, and be chopped by sawblade flying by, while slowly oxidizing cut parts
The 20% part is easy enough, a year of inflation prove that pretty well. Now you just need to make tipping illegal, pretty straightforward really.
Equally obligatory: link to the xkcd[0][1]

[0]https://xkcd.com/1053/
[1]https://m.xkcd.com/1053/
That and the fact that Rockset has been around for a while and has accumulated a decent number of users who are now in search of alternatives.
Yeah this sort of after-the-fact character assassination is BS. People get jealous of other people's fame. One publicity photo and a little fame and you've got whole threads of folks tearing you down, "she was /just/ the team leader". Whatever.
That goes both ways here. “Why can’t we violate causality?” “Because our current theories say you can’t.” BlackBerry execs didn’t believe the iPhone was a real demo based on their extensive practical understanding of phone design and batteries at the time.

Human history if full of Rumsfeld’s “unknown unknowns”.
Thank you for sharing this information. I am also applying for membership and am eager to see Codeberg succeed.

However, I am concerned about the long-term sustainability of Codeberg, especially if it plans to support CI (which is resource-intensive) and attract a significantly larger user base.

Similarweb statistics indicate a substantial difference in traffic between Codeberg and GitHub. While Codeberg has approximately 2 million page views (700.8K visits * 2.78 pages/visits) per month, GitHub boasts over 2.7 billion (462.4M visits * 6 pages/visits). This translates to Codeberg having roughly 0.1% of GitHub's traffic.

If Codeberg aims to reach even 10% of GitHub's traffic, the operational costs would likely increase by a factor of 100 or much more ( almost certain ). Has Codeberg internally addressed this scalability challenge and outlined strategies for managing such growth? What are Codeberg's long-term goals in terms of user base and features, and how do they plan to balance these aspirations with sustainability?

Thank you.
Took me a few minutes:

// generate a key at https://www.bing.com/indexnow/getstarted
const key = 'REPLACE_ME';

export const submitUrlsToIndexNow = async (urls: string[]) => {
await fetch('https://api.indexnow.org/IndexNow', {
body: JSON.stringify({
host: 'pillser.com',
key,
keyLocation: `https://pillser.com/${key}.txt`,
urlList: urls,
}),
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
},
method: 'POST',
});
};

I now just auto submit when updates to products are published.

Thanks!
Holy mackerel, yes. Once I realized pass through can and does work, I never looked back. This is also why I dislike how nvidia seems to do everything in its power to make it as painful as possible for anything after 3060, but that is a separate rant.
What would ‘reliable but unordered’ even mean? What’s the difference between a dropped message and one that’s just late?
This sounds interesting but the description goes way over my head. Anyone care to explain in layman's terms the concept and the non-obvious benefits?
The plot of The Matrix would beg to differ.
indeed. its condescending and word vomity. i would flag it except that it doesnt break any rules, it is just badly written. as the author acknowledges it is a 4hr stream of consciousness word dump. title is clickbait relative to what it is, a vector db review piece with a long preamble to puff himself up
There's also a command argument that can be provided in the authorized keys setup, which can force connections with a particular key to hit an entry-point application.
It's not just this. LLMs can do nothing but predict the next token based on their training and current context window. You can try to do things like add 'fact databases' or whatever to stop them from saying so many absurd things, but the fact remains that the comparisons to human intelligence/learning remain completely inappropriate.

I think the most interesting thought experiment is to imagine an LLM trained on state of the art knowledge and technology at the dawn of humanity. Language didn't yet exist, slash 'em with the sharp part was cutting edge tech, and there was no entirely clear path forward. Yet we somehow went from that to putting a man on the Moon in what was basically a blink of the eye.

Yet the LLM? It's going to be stuck there basically unable to do anything, forever, until somebody gives it some new tokens to let it mix and match. Even if you tokenize the world to give it some sort of senses, it's going to be the exact same. Because no matter how much it tries to mix and match those tokens it's not going to be able to e.g. discover gravity.

It's the same reason why there are almost undoubtedly endless revolutionary and existence-altering discoveries ahead of us. Yet LLMs trained on essentially the entire written corpus of human knowledge? All they can do is provide basic mixing and matching of everything we already know, leaving it essentially frozen in time. Like we are as well currently, but we will break out. While the LLM will only move forward once we tell it what the next set of tokens to mix and match are.
Along with K&R (and K and Plauger’s “Software Tools”), the Dragon book, Bentley’s Programming Pearls, and Holzmann’s Beyond Photography, AST’s books were the most formative in my life (I started coding in 1976 but was self-taught until early 80s when I got to college and read all these brilliant works). Long overdue recognition; so many people benefited from the lucidity of these minds.
Low-fi university sites are often maintained by professors who have been around a long time and have a "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" attitude.

In this case, it appears the author is still active at the university. https://www.higp.hawaii.edu/index.php/people/peter-j-mougini...
> 2029's visit will be particularly close, with the asteroid coming within 32,000 kilometers (20,000 miles) of the Earth's surface

Wow, that is incredibly close. 20,000 miles is about how far you fly round-trip from JFK to Singapore.

> The OSIRIS-APEX spacecraft will dip toward the surface of Apophis and fire its engines to kick up loose rocks and dust

Just hearing this scares me (knowing nothing about orbital physics). I am just imagining a couple generations down the line astronomers saying, well, this asteroid used to not be a concern, except one time we went up there and kicked some rocks around, which accidentally set it onto a direct course for Earth in 2150..
I think they greatly underestimate the heat problems with a data center in space. Specifically one in orbit where you have to radiate heat away.
looking at the pricing, brevo is way cheaper
The unfortunate thing is many people seem to equate cynicism with demonstration of intelligence. While you generally need to be smart to come up with reasons why something might not work, it becomes a lazy way of thinking. Experience in life has taught me that it is far simpler to sit back and poke holes in things than to construct something new.
https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/Planetary_Defence/Apophis

https://neo.ssa.esa.int/risk-list