skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No because you can cut funding by slowing the annual increase from the general fund. Be that for inflation or just population growth.

Year 0: general fund hands 100m to schools.

Year 1: General fund hands 101m / year and lotteries add 10m to that yay! 111m for school, or except ‘inflation’ was 2% so it’s more like 109m.

Year 2: General fund hands 102m / year and lottery adds 10.2m, ‘inflation’ was 2%. So adjusting for inflation Schools get ~108 million and general fund only spends ~98m.

Repeat as needed until general fund is handing the equivalent of 90m with the slack taken up by the lottery.
The interfaces with which we think
It's manufactured pretty much the same as any other chip, using photolithography. Most of the analog components would be CMOS transistors, just larger. They might use a BiCMOS process with a few extra steps to make bipolar transistors. And there might be an extra step for the capacitors. But overall, the chip uses an old, simple manufacturing process, much easier than cutting-edge processors.
Looking forward to Linux touch-enabled Dell XPS Arm 2-in-1 based on Qualcomm Oryon.
> the audit described in the source article doesn't seem to mention any such costs.

Not sure I understand what you're saying - it's not mentioned in the article, which means it does not exist? Anyway, have a nice day.
Driving bigger cars which are often only bigger outside has very little utility or even negative one if you don't count pleasure people get from driving dangerously. Minivans beat SUVs in almost all use cases and are safer for others as well but here we are.

I am not saying cars don't have utility but the problem is that you can buy a more dangerous, more polluting, bigger one and not pay the costs you incur on others. It's like smokers blowing the smoke into other people faces and then disposing of the cigarette butt on the street without paying anything.

Just make drivers pay the costs they incur on others and then let people choose. Right now it's a giant subsidy for driving at every step.
> I also have a revulsion to back ticks.

Yeah, I understand... But this is other language with a similar syntax for a similar functionality.
If you're just signing, is there any role for MPC in in there?
Layer 3 and down yes, 4 and up depends
Discussed previously:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22778988 (April 2020, 90 comments)
Everything computes in a general sense, even atoms. But one could just as easily say everything is "just" mathematics because all models of reality are mathematical. In general I think it's important to be wary of totalizing ontologies and metaphysics of reality that reduce everything to a single universal substance (monadology) or activity like computation (computationalism).
Yes it has an editor and a debugger, and some other stuff. So what? Its still an application. An application forcing you to update your OS would be laughed out of the room in any other situation. Personally I wouldn't defend such a broken design, but to each his own.
Is there a problem with the TI NFC chips? They all seem to be purchasable and have available datasheets.
With remote work and Globalization, it may not regress but will definitely continue to become more competitive. An "Average" engineer even in a LCOL area in US will cost a lot more than an "average" engineer in say South America and of course in Asia. Companies that have figured this out are already using the global market to their advantage.
My proposed fix is to make speeding ticket funds NOT EVER go to local governments, pass vehicle noise limits comparable to last decade's new vehicles stock (with fat paycheck busting fines), pass every cop a handheld combination laser range finder/parabolic decibel meter/video camera enforcement device/"gun," and make the fines go totally to local government. 3rd time or intentional over-100 decibel should be crusher (with no loan discharge) for the car and five years in the clink for felony disturbing the peace.

No more loud fucklechucks! :^)
Both Turing and Von Neumann machines (and the lambda calculus by Church) were designed to be minimal implementations that were still powerful enough to be provably complete in a mathematical sense. Mother Nature is under no such constraints: she happily constructs massively parallel "computers" with millions of global variables, each being written to by every core. That human minds cannot debug such systems is not Her problem. The only constraint is if it works, and it does.
Sometimes it feels like the pursuit of digitization has actually made them less efficient and lower quality overall.

Instead of just having a doctor providing medical care and a government giving them a check suddenly you have a thousand programmers, data center management, managers of programmers, information security teams trying in vain to secure the whole mess, etc.

And that's before you get into the fact that the doctor suddenly can't practice at all when some teenager decides to ransomware the whole business.
Strangely enough, I used the ticket in the article for the REM train (from Du Quartier, where I was staying).
These bugs can be described as the major or minor mode evaluating code that is provided as part of the buffer that the mode is being enabled for. The two semi-recent examples that come to mind include Org (which offers this code evaluation as a feature) and text/enriched (which allowed arbitrary Lisp evaluation through a non-standard extension). In both of these cases, the evaluation was -somewhat- intended and even documented, so these are not bugs in the traditional definition. They become security bugs when one takes into account the exposed attack surface / dynamic interaction with parts of Emacs automatically switching on the mode (e.g. through an email in Gnus) on 3rd party untrusted input.

I don't expect to see code evaluation on untrusted input as intended features in web browser or chat modes.
> wooly mammoth (yes, it's been seriously considered)

Hell yeah. I'm not really a fan of the lab grown meat aspect but I'd try a wooly mammoth burger.
IMHO it isn't an AMD or Intel problem, it is a "every driver and piece of hardware on the machine has to cooperate with low power modes" problem.

Apple owns the stack and iterates slowly.

Most laptops change to some of their chips (wifi, graphics, etc) every year. But it can easily take a couple of years of experience working with a shop and writing drivers for it to fix every power usage bug.

For many years (!!) Microsoft actually kept the same wireless chipset in their Surface machines. Was it the latest and greatest? No, but it worked!

Then or course you have software. For years Firefox had a bug where if any open tab has GPU accelerated content, it would prevent the entire machine from going to sleep.

If Microsoft clamps down on that sort of behavior it'll break someone's software (complaints about laptops going to sleep fall into 1 of 2 camps, it happens too often or it doesn't happen enough !)
>PicoLisp uses dynamic binding for symbolic variables. This means that the value of a >symbol is determined by the current runtime context, not by the lexical context in the source file.

>This has advantages in practical programming. It allows you to write independent code >fragments as data which can be passed to other parts of the program to be later executed >as code in that context.

This amuses me because while its technically true this amazing feat is accomplished only by denuding of the code of substantial expressive power - namely the relation between the lexical denotation of the code and its meaning. I will say this - aesthetically, I prefer picolisp's approach to Common Lisp's, which is to just paper over this problem with gensyms, packages, etc. Give me hygienic macros or give me death.
You must hate poor people as that's who it's going to affect the most.
tl;dr: There is concern that BigNames will give AI "root" on your life and let it take action on your behalf that would have previously required permission, e.g. logging in with a FANG account.

About the time that real costs are incurred, a class-action lawsuit would presumably follow.
Managed to build it using "-DWAMR_BUILD_REF_TYPES=1"
And it works! Now is time to dive deep :)
Perhaps you are looking for prosopagnosia or "face blindness"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosopagnosia
Does a cave beneath Pembroke Castle hold key to fate of early Britons?
We had solutions to Leetcode problems before LLMs, I don't see what's changed.

If your concern is about the value/signal of such an interview, it's the same as before regardless of how high or low you think it is.

If your concern is about cheating, without LLMs people can and sometimes do cheat in remote interviews but can't really do it in-person. Sure LLMs give you another method for cheating, I don't think that's enough to expect some huge paradigm shift in interviews.
Two of the best parts, to me, about electric cars are:

1) lower pollution where people live, so you can go for runs and such without breathing in a bunch of noxious gas

2) how much quieter inner city walking will become. It can’t come fast enough!
every single transportation system that uses disposable nfc are definitely making a ton of money for the vendor.

and every transportation system that pretends to run as a profit center and not a cost center also makes ton of money for the vendors.
I think one could macro in some type system on top of a collection type in Factor if one wanted to.

Don't really see the point, though. Static on-the-nose typing tends to shine when a lot of people need to do quick edits to large amounts of code, settings where code is never done, and that's not exactly where Forth-like languages are a good fit. They're more for settings where few people think long and hard and experiment a lot until the right solution is found and then it's done, I think.

In practice I often find the shape of data to be good enough and don't feel a need to also put names to it. It might be convenient to invent a type to carry some constraint, like UserNicknameString that can only be up to 200 4 byte characters (or whatever the big emoji chars in Unicode are) and no more, but that can also be solved functionally. As far as I'm aware no one has yet created a serious ERP or social media product in a Forth-like language, so maybe the perks that come with having an ontology of ten thousand types keeping things in check are still illusory for the hardcore forthers.
Gordon Corera wrote a good book covering their use in WWII:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/37933332-secret-pigeon-s...
"absolutely can be done by someone with 6 months of bootcamp"

You forgot to add "with a lot of hand holding and guidance and that too if that 6 month bootcamper is competent enough and cares about learning on their own".
Environmentally because more diverse forrests tend to be more robust, depending on their climate (taiga is not very diverse). Tree growth doesn't slow down as trees get older. Their growth accelerates because: they have more foliage to gather sunlight and exchange gasses, everytime they add a growth ring it is a bigger ring than the last one, they grow taller or wider to get more sunlight and gas exchange. There is an optimal size/m² of course. Tree farms have ROIs and efficiency problems, they cannot take advantage of these qualities of forrests. They need straight timber and a payday at some point.

Ecologically because old growth forrests have a much more diverse system with big fungal networks, ecological nooks and crannies, etc.
A system takes time to build.
This is definitely part of the future for better storage systems. Too much responsibility is currently in the hands of programmers (like me) to not make any mistakes. The storage layer can be a high consequence place to make a mistake!
Oh and motorcycles at full rev must be made as quiet as a VW TDI. Thank Harley Davidson and his customers!
Adult brains, too. I appreciate the study, but this is one of those "yes, obviously" situations for anyone who has ever been outside amongst cars.
Accurately placing heavy, aerodynamic objects onto people when you start out directly above them is not very difficult. The hard parts are either placing the object on top of the person from a few hundred or thousand miles away, or - in this case - placing an object that tends to flutter rather than follow a ballistic trajectory.
WHAT CORNER IS THIS ON I WILL GO THERE RIGHT NOW AND WAIT TO BE HATTED BY AN AI
Big improvements, but keep in mind that air and tyre resistance are the loudest aspects of driving at even moderate speeds.
With cpan it's the same, you need to install deps somehow.

You don't need it if it's just a python script with stdlib, just like with raw perl.
> unattainable with foreseeable technology

This I agree with; it's just… well, I'm 40 now[0], and a lot of biology that can be done today involved technology that was not foreseeable when I was born.

So, yes, pharmaceuticals getting the hard problems solved first, sure — I'd say that I'd know not to invest in vat-meat startups until pharmaceuticals companies have solved problems I'm oblivious to except for the logical impossibility with such a test.

[0] aaaaaaa
We already know pollution from cars increases childhood asthma, and I imagine those pollutants could affect brain development as well.

Edit: Also I would be curious to know how dog barks affect children's brains. Of all the environmental noise, dogs are often the loudest and most jarring, anecdotally.
Building roads and selling cars, though, also makes an awful lot of money for the vendors.
We did a study in my neighborhood after two pedestrian deaths. The deaths definitely were the motivator for the community action and studies.

You know why the idiot traffic engineers made the streets so wide in the area where these oversized cars killed two people? “The average commute on the road would be extended by 1 minute.”
> It's about producing any kind of protein whatsoever which can be ingratiated in to the food supply chain anywhere

We have at least some options for this already. Mycoprotein is one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycoprotein | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quorn#Production (apart from the plant isolates)
You can say similar things for Bash or Python (or Perl, JS, etc):

> Too many ways to do the same thing.

In Bash you can use backticks, $(), and bash -c for the same thing. And also [ ], [[ ]], test. And so on.

> Not packaged by default on most Linux.

You can install it. Some distros (e.g. Alpine) even don't ship Bash. If you are restricted to only what comes by default in an operating system, then probably a simple script written in sh may be the solution.

> Monkey patching makes things even harder to debug.

Just because you can doesn't mean that you should. I won't label something as "hard to debug" for features that I don't need to use, I label as "hard to debug" for features that I _need_ to use. Then I can say: Bash is hard to debug.
So what data should they use? Decisions need to be made and they need to use the info they have on hand. Sure, more is definitely better but perfection is the enemy of progress. I don't know if they ever state that is the end all be all truth and I've seen numerous pieces outlining the omissions. I think its still important to release and make decisions on because some data is better than none at all
Thanks for this summary! I definitely hadn't seen the point about comparability between blobs of data because of the alignment. But that really seems like an odd point to me, as I almost entirely see / use these with time series data, where pretty much the whole point is to compare the evolution of the values over time using their "vertical" location, with a was to see the shape of a distribution of values at each point in time, at a glance.
> My Mac is constantly bugging me to install OS updates. Same with my iPad and my iPhone. Apple gives you no option to skip the updates. The only way to avoid the constant carping is to allow Apple to do the update automatically, which is not by any means having control of your own devices.

I've re-read what you wrote several times, and I can't help but come to the same conclusion that the problem you're reporting is related to "constantly bugging" and "Apple gives you no option to skip the updates". Turning off the updates solves both of these.

Now you say you want the harping, but don't want the automatic updates. That's easy: "Check for updates" is on, "Install macOS updates" is off, "Install Security Responses and system files" is off. Now you'll be alerted but the updates won't happen automatically.

I'm not sure if you really couldn't figure this out, or if you're just venting a bit, so I'm happy to give the benefit of the doubt. Either way, now you'll have exactly what you want :)
I Tried Bend
He needs to put the AI in the hat. Hat-drones.

Once he's done that, the military sector beckons.
that's wild, but not surprised

they don't deserve the Escrow.com domain name to be honest.
This premise is incorrect: SSH doesn't need to be an suid binary because it's already running as root, and then SSH creates a new environment for the user, exactly like sudo does, but with all the added complexity and overhead (and surface) of privileged network access.

To be clear, I love SSH and we even run a userify instance to distribute keys, but juts comparatively the surface area of the ssh daemon alone is greater than sudo alone.

(however, even with the extra complexity, you might trust the history of portable OpenSSH more than sudo, and that's a good, but different, conversation to have also.)
> This assumption is trivialization of the problem.

No, this is the main objection. You need to justify why, and how, you're going to restrict freedom of speech instead of avoiding the problem.

> Free speech can generally be constrained - it is not absolute right (Article 19 of ICCPR), so every case where restriction is considered must take into account the context and the other human rights, rather than granting the free speech right unconditionally. I don’t think SCOTUS understood well the gravity of their decision back then.

Irrelevant, the U.S does not respect the ICCPR regarding freedom of speech. But either way, no one is arguing that free speech is absolute. This is a straw man.

> When considering free speech for corporations, it must be taken into account that corporations often have more resources at disposal which they can use to amplify the voices of their shareholders or management distorting the democratic process.

So? Lots of things distort the democratic process. Why is this different than a celebrity, an activist group, or demographic behavior distorting the democratic process? Can you quantify and demonstrate the effect?

> Right to choose the government and hold it accountable is also a human right, which is clearly harmed by created imbalance of power. This is exactly what has happened in America, making some researchers calling it oligarchy rather than republic.

Sorry, I didn't realize we slipped into an alternate dimension where poor people could not vote. Just kidding, haha. Sounds more like you're sour that your political project isn't popular.
Well, I'm happy that I you learnt something new here :-).

Ruby is quite similar to Python, perhaps you don't even need to study too much!
Tried to buy a hat and this person is... sold out. For a while!
Because it’s not just class rooms, although those are places you want them to be at their peak. It’s just the easiest to consistently test.

Additionally, with how severely under funded education is, you’re not going to get much effective sound proofing. Most classrooms can’t even afford regular maintenance.
And that pollution of tire degradation is one of the biggest sources of particles from cars
The death knell was that they couldn’t shrink the plasma cells enough to support 4K. LCD didn’t kill it, in the same sense that LCD doesn’t kill OLED.
That is just true every time you have someone enter a totally new field of work.

Just compare it to engineering disciplines. Imagine a civil engineering bootcamp, 6 month of that, some motivation and coaching from your coworker is enough to evaluate the structural soundness of public infrastructure?

I think you completely underestimate how high the barrier to entry is for engineering disciplines compared to software development. The high pay for software engineers in the US is a phenomenon that is driven by absurdly high demand. For no other discipline is the barrier to entry so low and the reward so high, even outside of the US this isn't the case. In Europe software development is paid very differently.
> You’d also ban them [bikes] on roadways with speed limits far above what a human can reasonably propel a bike to ... You’re better off building parallel infrastructure

They are and we do? You know those signs when you get on a highway that say things like pedestrians/bicycles/horses/etc prohibited? That's what those are for.

If you're proposing that the rest of the roads' speed limits be lowered to what's achievable by the average cyclist, then why not just advocate for that directly? Personally I don't appreciate the oversigning trend, generally preferring to drive at a decent clip as conditions permit most of the time, but also being content to follow the rare bicycle at that vehicle's speed until an opportunity to pass with a wide berth and clear oncoming visibility.

The real problem here is drivers who expect to be able to continue driving at whatever speed they want regardless of who else is using the road. Apart from when I was cycling myself, I used to experience this pretty harshly while shoveling snow. Half the drivers would treat me as a human being and slow and go mostly into the other lane. The other half would continue their speed right at me, ostensibly thinking it was acceptable to create close call danger for fun and spray me with shit from their tires (ie not just assault but outright battery). Similar situation with a dinky ride on lawnmower. It's funny how the ratio changed when I started doing the snow/grass along the road with a compact farm tractor - apparently the prospect of assholes' cars being significantly damaged effects their ability to see!

As far as taxes, municipal real estate taxes more than pay for the meager wear bicycles cause to the road. And as a general proponent of freedom I certainly wouldn't want to implement multiple new draconian papers please mandates just to assign taxes a few percent more accurately.
This. People always underestimate how much noise rolling resistance of tyres plays in the sound profile of traffic. Electric cars are worse under 50mph, basically because they're heavier.
The City of London is sort of a lobbying organization for the UK financial community. Or at least it thinks it is.[1] Its police force is not ceremonial - there's a sizable Economic Crime Directorate, handling fraud cases. They claim a 75% clearing rate.

[1] https://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/about-us/plans-policies/our-...
The Death of the Web
Strangely, I can easily do this in my dreams, or when I’m on the verge of sleep, but not at all when I’m awake. It’s like a different brain takes over. Really want to “unlock” this ability, would help a lot with art.
?

The questionable dev choices I am talking about is such limited hardware support, pixel devices only being officially supported. That is Google hardware and I don't trust it.

That isn't attacking a person, that is a direct criticism of a project.