skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I also have a hard time understanding how they differentiate between salt water and fresh water so long ago. It seems like the salinity of the oceans has changed over time. The first seas might have been quite fresh as compared to the ocean today (or even more salty).
you have to request the hat lol, you dont just walk buy and get shit dropped on you, you book a drop
I can hear my thoughts and even speak to myself. I don't picture myself doing that and I don't have any image in my head.

Maybe it "looks" like a comic with only speech bubbles. It's still not the right image, because there is no image, but it also doesn't feel like a total void.
I just bought movie tickets with a $1.89 "fee" tacked on to the price. They didn't even say what the fee was for. Just "$11.75 + $1.89 Fee". There was zero findable information about what the fee was for and why it was that amount. They didn't even list a vague purpose like "Service Fee." It was just a fee. Why do this? Just say "$13.64" like a normal human being.
I would say it's quite fair. It's not just me but several coworkers, other people in this thread, and reviews on the actual VSCode extension itself. I sank several hours trying to fix whatever issue it has with my system and continued to run into problems. I'll give it another shot when I'm back on Ruby projects.
Presumably, knowing the fan you've installed into the device you've designed, you could map those noisy areas...
“We will define one person of compute as 20 PFLOPS”

Why?
Sounds like you've been unlucky. A couple of things I'd suggest:

1. network before applying to a job - linkedin, meetups, anything

2. look into adjacent careers - infosec, devops, customer support at devtool companies. you might realise you like it
CPG Grey's videos re the City are a bit of fun that he slapped together in two or three days, not documentaries.
Not sure I understand what you are talking about…
Claude 3.5 is not bad…

Ellie sells shells. Bob, slob hobo, sees Ellie. Bob begs Ellie, "Sell shells." Ellie giggles, "Gosh, hello!" Bob loses. Bob sobs.

Ellie sees Bill. Bill sells bibles. Ellie lies, "Bill, sell bibles else." Bill sells bibles. Ellie gobbles bibles. Bill obsesses. Ellie sighs.

Liz sees Bob. Bob boils. Liz giggles. Bob hobbles. Liz besiege Bob. Bob begs Liz, "Loose." Liz goes. Bob sees highs.

Ellie sees Liz. Ellie giggles. Liz boils. Ellie bless Liz. Liz loses. Ellie sees bliss.

Ellie, Liz, Bob solos. Ellie, Liz, Bob lies. Ellie, Liz, Bob sees bellies. Ellie, Liz, Bob sees highs. Ellie, Liz, Bob giggles.
> I do understand that Meta’s centralized tool is more useful for your usecase.

One of my chief Git complaints is that 99.9% of projects are de facto centralized on GitHub. Genuinely decentralized projects are vanishingly rare.

The way Git auto-advances branch tags causes a lot of pain. Having lots of people commit to a shared feature branch that has lots of rebasing is quite easy when the “tip” is infrequently updated. Each person thinking they can declare the new tip with every commit is the source of pain.
I think it has already propelled us ahead by 2 years.
If you have your mail server in order, think SPF, DKIM/DMARC, this rarely if ever happens and when it does you will be notified.
These days, i know more private individuals who configured their mail server well than that i know businesses who do.
"Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action."

It sounds like the problem we have here is that each individual incident is analyzed and catalogued as an incident, so we never get to 'enemy action'. The most urgent issue to resolve is whose insurance is going to pay for it, which requires assigning blame, and in each case it's usually clear where the blame lies. This is all the system working entirely as expected and we can't really skip this step.

What ought to happen next is that the incidents get compiled, trends turn up, and we change our designs according to those trends.

The article is pretty light on details about the extent to which this isn't happening among traffic engineers. Requiring smaller vehicles or banning touchscreens has to come from Congress, so it's outside the control of any city's engineers. Anecdotally, the engineers in my own city seem pretty determined to consider the possibility that any given accident had a bad design as the root cause, and regularly fix and improve intersections and road markings according to what is happening. They're not perfect, but I don't get the sense that they're resting easy on the assurance that it's all user error either.
Meet the world’s first known jumping leech  if you dare
What I've learned is that there are people heavily focused on their senses and then there are others who take in information in other ways (possibly intuition, etc) because they are always in their head.

I have an incredibly poor short term memory, my wife an amazing sensor. She notices everything.... object placement, where things were weeks ago. I didn't notice an elephant walking by me years ago in Thailand; nor last week in a western state town I didn't the open carry long gun that a guy had whom I spoke to for 5 seconds. [he was protesting through engagement]

These are running jokes. I also can't relate to a majority of the world (sensors) - however, I can solve complex multi-chain problems in my head that they drop out at step 1.
If box plots require an formal and accredited statistics course to understand, but as you mention they are taught to 15 year olds (presumably incorrectly) in school and used by people with power making decisions that affect everyone in organisations such as the UN and NASA, then even if the author is unqualified it seems their point is 'accidentally' correct. No one should be using these plots except extremely smart and trained people who do know how to read them, as it could have serious negative consequences.
US Olympic and other teams will "TAKE" their own AC units to Paris

NOT bring!

I love good grammer and good speling.

The basic principles for using bring and take are pretty clear.

BRING:

Bring is the “close” partner in the pair, associated with coming to a destination where the speaker (or listener) is located: Bring that here.

Bring me some cookies. (I am the destination for those cookies. It doesn’t matter where you started.)

bring your handbag

Bring something, Bring anything.

TAKE:

Take is the “far” partner, associated with going away from a starting point where the speaker (or listener) is located: Take that there.

Take my plate back into the kitchen. (You’re leaving from here to go to the kitchen.)

Take my car to the garage, not - Bring my car to the garage

Take my wife out for a meal, not - Bring my wife out for a meal
Dopamine, Intelligence, and Sex Drive: An Intriguing Nexus
That's a great idea! Did I tell you about my cousin and his flower pot/anvil/piano business idea btw?
Oh, thanks for this. This is the idea I had in my head about this as well. Especially in dreams, it just feels like the brain gives you "what you need" for the dream and -- because of how brains work -- "ignores" the rest, which is why you can't recall it, you never "needed" to.

This feels way more like "people not really grasping how brains work" than some condition.
She doesn't seem to have the experience to make it successful (either the ability to run it or hire) and you didn't have the time to run it either, given that, the company halting is almost a given as with any sole proprietorship when the founder suddenly dies
Yeah :/ was looking for more with a bold title like that.
AI, Narcissism, and the Future of Sex
Putting imbalance into the system, extracting resources.
City of London Ward Lists consist of c19,000 individuals, who have one vote each.

Corporations voting = urban myth
I will never allow my linux to update my fonts ever again ... Arbitrary code execution in its finest form.
Without reading the article, I'm guessing this needs the NSFW tag.
> However, I am concerned about the long-term sustainability of Codeberg

Why? If you want to support it, do so. If it collapses, change some git repository URLs in your READMEs.
> That depends on what state you're in.

Are you under the impression that this is some kind of unobserved Schrodinger's Cat restaurant? There is no depends. That's what it is. It has already been observed. The state within the box is known.
Anybody, or anything, can have its own flag in England.
I'm confused. The article describes a really cool project as if it were already implemented, but there is no video of it actually working? Am I missing something?
Overlaid histos can be confusing because people don’t know if they are stacked or overlapped.

One solution is to smooth into a kde and then use transparency to indicate overlap, but that’s introducing more complexity than you want for a quick n dirty first pass
Yes, they were making their predictions based on physics, math, and experimental evidence. One thing you have to keep in mind is that in most cases science tends to follow discovery, rather than vice versa. Here [1] is a random selection of great quotes from the time. If you're not familiar with the names, feel free to Wiki them. It is about as credentialed a list of scientific experts as one might imagine possible:

--------

Is it not demonstrated that a true flying machine, self-raising, self-sustaining, self-propelling, is physically impossible? — Joseph LeConte, November 1888

It is apparent to me that the possibilities of the aeroplane, which two or three years ago were thought to hold the solution to the [flying machine] problem, have been exhausted, and that we must turn elsewhere. — Thomas Edison, November 1895

I can state flatly that heavier than air flying machines are impossible. — Lord Kelvin, 1895
I have not the smallest molecule of faith in aerial navigation other than ballooning, or of the expectation of good results from any of the trials we heard of. So you will understand that I would not care to be a member of the Aeronautical Society. — Lord Kelvin, 1896

The present generation will not [fly in the next century], and no practical engineer would devote himself to the problem now. — William Worby Beaumont, January 1900

There is no basis for the ardent hopes and positive statements made as to the safe and successful use of the dirigible balloon or flying machine, or both, for commercial transportation or as weapons of war. — George Melville, December 1901

The demonstration that no possible combination of known substances, known forms of machinery and known forms of force, can be united in a practical machine by which men shall fly along distances through the air, seems to the writer as complete as it is possible for the demonstration to be. — Simon Newcomb, 1900

Flight by machines heavier than air is unpractical and insignificant, if not utterly impossible. — Simon Newcomb, 1902
It is complete nonsense to believe flying machines will ever work. — Stanley Mosley, 1905

The aeroplane will never fly. — Lord Haldane, 1907

--------

I'm sure one can dig up plenty more. Mathematicians and physicists simply thought it impossible. You could have asked the question on stock overflow math/physics of the time and gotten plenty of well informed and accurate (by the standards of the times) explaining exactly why it was impossible. It just so turns out that everybody was wrong, as was about to be demonstrated by a couple of high school drop-out bike shop repairmen. As the article mentions, one noteworthy thing is that the final quote is even after the Wright Bros succeeded. So absurd was the concept to many, that most people still did not believe it happened, even after it did.

[1] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/heavier-than-air-flight-impos...
I did read all of your sentences.

You says: “Lane splitting motorcycles and bicyclists are literally always illegal btw.”

Vs: “On August 19, 2016, California became the first state in the U.S. to declare lane splitting legal in an effort to relieve traffic jams.”https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/personal-injury/california-lane...

How do you square those two?
Human ego at its finest. If we can’t do it, nobody in the universe can. I’m loving the humbling
That's not completely fair. Nokia was clearly well aware of the pains of Symbian development, and they bought Qt to improve that. Qt was used both for Symbian and Maemo/MeeGo in the last years. Especially QML for the UI parts was well ahead of the competition, giving declarative and hardware accelerated UIs with great dev convenience.
Do you need to be a Costco member to eat at the food court?

I thought "no", which means they are still making profit on their food alone.
Mind saying which one it was?

There are so many I can't even say I have a good candidate for it :(
“If you play the music loud, your fps will increase!”
Perhaps it was blocked for legit reasons?

It's impossible to know with just the tweet as shown.
Ha. Guess you’re right. Have you?
I don't see anything. I feel like we're talking past each other. I am skeptical that "visualize an apple" to some people gets them the mental equivalent of a Blender model where they get a 360 degree view of the image and from there they are able to apply arbitrary transformations. I can "replay" songs in my head with pretty good fidelity to the original if I remember enough of it, but I think that's fairly common.
B-Trees Require Fewer Comparisons Than Balanced Binary Search Trees
What we really need and would never do is to put a pedestrian collision rating in NCAP, which Euro-NCAP already does. (NCAP is the system used to give safety ratings to cars.)

Right now the NCAP has pedestrian avoidance but nothing on impact. It would be fairly trivial to test the impact of hitting a crash dummy at 30mph.
If you can't attack their code/work, you attack the person ?
Atleast one of their devs is being gangstalked by Kiwifarms and has powerfull adversaries in the weapons industry who work against him and his work.
Please be careful with your criticism because there is entire troll-farms/PR-bureaus out to hurt them. Glowies are probably not happy with them either, so that's a tough world they live in .
Ask HN: My interest has gone down, how is yours?
I just realized my interest in HN is fading and even though i still come by often to read the headlines the occasion where i read on have plummeted. Are you experiencing the same? I don't feel that my interests and hobbies have changed much.
There are plenty of ways to have the venv automatically activate (and de-activate) when you enter/leave the directory for the project. direnv [0], mise [1], or various shell hooks.

There are useful libraries, I’m not saying there aren’t. I just dislike it when people include one as a dependency when they really didn’t need it.

[0]: https://github.com/direnv/direnv

[1]: https://github.com/jdx/mise
It's the width of multiplexing that has to on between having a fetch line and extracting a single instruction. As an instruction can start at many different locations, you need to be able to shift down from all those positions.

That's not too bad for the first instruction in a line but the second instruction is dependant on how the first instruction decides, and the third dependent on the second. Etc. So it's not only a big multiplexer tree, but a content dependent multiplexer tree. If you're trying to unpack multiple instructions each clock (or course you are. You've got six schedulers to feed) then that's a big pile of logic.

Even RISC-V has this problem, but there they've limited it to two sizes of instruction (2 and 4 bytes), and the size is in the first 2 bits of each instruction (so no fancy decode needed)
Hmm, I wonder about words that end in -oo? Don't have a calculator with me atm to see if it will work/look good to lead with 0.0 ...

If so we could add boo, goo, loo, and zoo, and maybe some longer words. Maybe.
That would most likely be the OpenCV bit
Why Should I Write?

Should I write?

I write

Why Write?

Why I write?

Its an either/or (Kierkegaard) condundrum
Picom has an awesome feature [0] that, for the sake of all our eyes, should come by default on every device with a screen. It can continuously adjust the brightness of individual windows by averaging all the pixels in that window. It's great for defending against "flashbangs" (when a new tab burns your eyes with a blank white screen).

0: https://github.com/yshui/picom/blob/ae73f45ad9e313091cdf720d...
>car manufacturing and other industries that are heavily subsidised

Any evidence that BMW, Mercedes and VW aren't massive net tax payers?

I had this conversation before, where someone claimed that e.g. the automotive industry was heavily subsidized. But when I looked into it I found absolutely no evidence.

The German government is directly supported by the massively successful German industry. It is the sole reason Germany can even afford it's welfare state. On it's face it is absurd to claim that that industry is tax payer supported, completely ridiculous.

>If you think the poor are leeching off society then the same goes for the fossil fuel industry, the agricultural industry, car manufacturing and other industries

Social security is the top expenditure point in the budget.
In Europe regular B license for cars only allow up to 3500 kg gross weight. For car or combination. That is already lot of car.
The exterior photos provide enough info that you can figure out the intersection/building if you’re curious
The difference between Europe and the US is fairly simple. Euro NCAP has a pedestrian collision test as part of the safety rating and NCAP does not, only pedestrian avoidance.

If you could not get a five star safety rating because your car mangles somebody when hitting them at 30mph the tune would change pretty quickly. See all the things tested in Euro NCAP in section 2.2. https://www.euroncap.com/media/80156/euro-ncap-aeb-lss-vru-t...
Same node. Not same architecture.
You're shifting the goal posts there. We're talking about a device that fits in your pocket, powered by a tiny battery. And, by the knowledge of computing at the time. The amount of energy required to power such a device, let alone the space, would have made the concepts plainly impossible, by the limits of what was known at the time.
Which has higher throughput?
Show HN: I made a site which tells you whether you should quit your job or not
In general, dictionaries are useful in providing a history, and sometimes, an origin of a term's usage. However, they don't provide a comprehensive or absolute meaning. Unlike scientific laws, words aren't discovered, but rather manufactured. Subsequently they are, adopted by a larger public, delimited by experts, and at times recontextualized by an academic/philosophical discipline or something of that nature.

Even in the best case, when a term is clearly defined and well-mapped to its referent, popular usage creates a connotation that then supplants the earlier meaning. Dictionaries will sometimes retain older meanings/usages, and in doing so, build a roster of "dated", "rare", "antiquated", or "alternative" meanings/usages throughout a term's mimetic lifecycle.
Define "actual experiences". Normal people can not imagine an object like a red apple and actually see it, same as if one existed right in front of them. They can "visualize" it (just like you, it sounds), as in they can think of what it looks like, they would recognize one, they can even imagine broader scenes involving this apple (like an entire grocery aisle) but there is no "actual experience." You couldn't walk straight otherwise, you'd constantly be dodging imaginary objects that you'd be seeing.
> After all, they're the ones deciding to offer the option to tip.

I don't have direct experiencing running a retail business outside of hospitality, but I would venture to guess it is the only way to retain staff. After all, if you are the worker, why would you work at the store that refuses to allow tips when you can just as easily go to the store next door that does?

Superficially, it is true that the business owner gets the final say, but they don't get to make the choice in a vacuum. You don't have a business without staff.
How do you like Simutrans? https://www.simutrans.com
FTFA:

"...and ultimately, why AI is just another pump-and-dump..." (06.35 into the video)
Arch-rivals Apple and Meta reportedly discuss AI partnership for iOS 18
Fine, their products are not made for you.

But they're a trillion dollar company because of their relentless focus on the end-user experience which you happen to dislike, but which most people love.
I can’t wrap my head around how that hat drops in a straight line. Between the propeller and any wind, how is that hat not all over the place?
> and there was no obvious way to dim it

This is another issue that plagues a lot of modern cars. Lack of physical buttons and moving a bunch of functionality into the touchscreen which increases distractions and causes the driver to get flustered.
You need a membership to get through the door, right?
G'mic 3.4.0: Image Processing in Its Prime
A new version 3.4.0 of G'MIC (GREYC's Magic for Image Computing) has just been released.
With this new release, we celebrate the project's 16th anniversary!

On this occasion, we summarize the recent features added to our open-source framework for digital image processing.
Make your own Arc [browser] at home
Here I am worried that my cat is going to knock my flat lightweight TV over one of these days, and you had a 300 lb TV? That sounds like what I need now!
> Isn't the problem here that the parent left the kid in the car. What does this have to do with Tesla.

Grandparent, and she put the kid in the carseat before trying to get in herself.

And if you read the article (yeah, yeah, against the rules, but you clearly didn't read it) it has to do with Tesla because the only way to open the door with a dead 12-volt battery is from the inside. The exterior mechanisms don't work. And a 20-month-old in a carseat isn't in a great position to help out the adults stuck on the outside.
The path separator in Japanese and Korean Windows
I spent less than 5 seconds learning how to use ollama: I just entered "ollama run llama3" and it worked flawlessly.

I spent HOURS setting up llama.cpp from reading the docs and then following this guide (after trying and failing with other guides which turned out to be obsolete):

https://voorloopnul.com/blog/quantize-and-run-the-original-l...

Using llama.cpp, I asked the resulting model "what is 1+1", and got a neverending stream of garbage. See below. So no, it is not anywhere near as easy to get started with llama.cpp.

--------------------------------

what is 1+1?") and then the next line would be ("What is 2+2?"), and so on.

How can I make sure that I am getting the correct answer in each case?

Here is the code that I am using:

\begin{code}
import random

def math_problem():
num1 = random.randint(1, 10)
num2 = random.randint(1, 10)
problem = f"What is {num1}+{num2}? "
return problem

def answer_checker(user_answer):
num1 = random.randint(1, 10)
num2 = random.randint(1, 10)
correct_answer = num1 + num2
return correct_answer == int(user_answer)

def main():
print("Welcome to the math problem generator!")
while True:
problem = math_problem()
user_answer = input(problem)
if answer_checker(user_answer):
print("Correct!")
else:
print("Incorrect. Try again!")

if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
\end{code}

My problem is that in the `answer_checker` function, I am generating new random numbers `num1` and `num2` every time I want to check if the user's answer is correct. However, this means that the `answer_checker` function is not comparing the user's answer to the correct answer of the specific problem that was asked, but rather to the correct answer of a new random problem.

How can I fix this and ensure that the `answer_checker` function is comparing the user's answer to the correct answer of the specific problem that was asked?

Answer: To fix this....

--------------------------------