skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In the first year of the University you write cpngruence with three horizontal lines. In the second, you just use two lines, aka an equal sign. Everyone knows = is overloaded.

The same happens with other signs, like the arrow of limit. In many cases it's confusing so you add a small note to the arrow, unless it's obvious (whatever that means).
Thank you for your reply. Welcome to submit your ai product to tap4 ai tools directory.
GPT-4o might not have been trained on a sufficiently large amount of visual data to develop advanced spatial intelligence. Perhaps it needs to see a lot more images, or perhaps it needs to be trained differently (e.g. predict the next frame in a video). I suspect SORA has more spatial intelligence internally than 4o.
Yes, though when doing it on purpose, you try to dissolve as much styrofoam into it as you can to get it closer to being a gel.

Not something to do out of curiosity though, fumes given off while burning are exactly something to be avoided.
All true, but using a BigDecimal to do that is abusing the implementation and keeping important assumptions implicit. Better to explicitly quantify the uncertainty with a second variable.
There is no "plot armor" in the real world, protecting humans from having bad things happening

Things do not, in fact, have a way of "working out"

If we don't want bad things to happen, we have to actively stop bad things from happening
As many pointed out this piece does have the general markers of propaganda.

OTOH, his points about Affirmative Action generally overlaps with those of Scott Alexander: https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/book-review-the-origins-of-....
There are also humans who can’t conjure up an image in their head. Mozilla cofounder wrote a fairly famous piece about his own experience.

https://www.theverge.com/2016/4/25/11501230/blake-ross-cant-...

If there are people who can’t picture and people who don’t have an inner dialogue, I think it lends more credence to the idea that we don’t have free will and are just a bunch of chemicals controlling our behavior. It also makes you think about consciousness and whether it’s even real.
Here's one: https://signal.org/blog/private-contact-discovery/
At this point China is about as communist as FedEx is federal. They are “state capitalist” which pretty much means the government owns or has controlling stakes in a lot of companies. Singapore’s is similar.
GigaTransfers.

128 GT is 8192 Gbps
Reminds me of the AlphaCode approach.

Why do you say it's sampling programs from "training data"? With that choice of words, you're rhetorically assuming the conclusion.

If he only sampled 20 programs, instead of 8000, will we still say the programs came from "training data", or will we say it's genuine OOD generalization? At what point do we attribute the intelligence to the LLM itself instead of the outer loop?

This isn't meant to be facetious. Because clearly, if the N programs sampled is very large, it's easy to get the right solution with little intelligence by relying on luck. But as N gets small the LLM has to be intelligent and capable of OOD generalization, assuming the benchmark is good.
Internet is more than the web.

Can the web make the rest of the internet slower.
Articles can be, sure.

This specific article is a propaganda piece, commissioned, paid for, and disseminated by The Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.

I won't argue with their right to spread their message, policies, and to engage in marketing exercises, but this is very much their work. As a matter of cold fact, not opinion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan_Institute_for_Policy...
Where Elon Musk keeps his money
It’s called out in the proposal, but generics allow custom container types to be created like ordered map. Iterators allow nice methods to be created by designers of these containers types, and used in a way that is similar to the go collections like map and slice. Mentioned earlier in the comments, someone brought up in order tree traversal as well.

I don’t see an issue having the for range syntax that works magically for go std lib containers extended to custom containers, especially since go std lib omits so many valuable containers
https://archive.ph/xDDc6
It really was good. From a user perspective, it blew Windows and Mac out of the water. The performance and reliability were unmatched on the desktop. I remember being able to change network settings without a reboot, which no other desktop OS could do for another couple years or so. The boot speed was also something to behold. It was something like 7 seconds to a login prompt. BeOS was ahead of its time. The only real problem with it was software availability.
It's only been a week since the million dollar prize was offered. Let's see what the SOTA is in a month.
Harvey Weinstein is convicted serial rapist, so likely not the best exemplar of the borderline behavior you're trying to describe.
The SMW developer community seems to be less active now a days, so i suspect SMW is even worse now.
"What fascinated me about Haskell when I was still a teenager? Who knows. I had been coding with increasing enthusiasm since I was 10 or 11 but I was no wunderkind. I certainly hadn’t attained anything like the skill or, more importantly, taste I had after just a few years in the working world. What I like about it today is that it’s quite natural to program in Haskell by building a declarative model of your domain data, writing pure functions over that data, and interacting with the real world at the program’s boundaries. That’s my favorite way to work, Haskell or not."

I adore these sentences.:)When I read it,it feels like I met myself.
The semantics are very close if not exactly identical. But it definitely feels and works as a separate language, mostly by having its own standard lib and toolchain.

It's not ruby syntax either. There are some very obvious inspirations, but it also explicitly rejects some standard ruby moves in favor of FP conventions. The whole "ruby for beam" angle was dropped years ago, and I'm not sure how much if any support that marketing tactic ever had from the official elixir devs.
There's an idea of 'fixed action patterns' where certain behaviors are encoded in the neurology of an animal, and triggered by certain stimulus.

For spiders then there is an action pattern that upon certain stimulus they will use their spinnerets begin forming a web, first placing anchor points and gradually building it up with radial threads and spiral. The exact behavior differs by species such that they have different resulting patterns. It seems possible that there is an element of 'learning' beyond the basic pattern as well, even in seemingly very simple animals.

I doubt the spiders have a mental model of what their web looks like as such, it's more evolutionary driven genetic behavior, a particular neuronal pattern encoding the action sequence rather than an underlying fundamental understanding.
Because it's straight from the horse's mouth, and it does in fact capture Go's philosophy perfectly. Go is, and was designed to be, a blub language.
Giant viral signatures on the Greenland ice sheet
Unfortunately this is the epitome of the HN comment section.

Instead of comments by users who have read the linked article, you have comments by people using the discussion as their personal diary.
Oh yes someone who calls out US stupidity must be earning 50 cents.

Funny how you forgot the (effective) ban on Chinese EVs (sorry "100% tariff only") too. Let's not even get into the ban of other manufacturers such as Huawei.
So, more $100,000 Elon Cybertrucks are going to save the planet from the climate crisis we are facing?

I stand by my question: what is the big plan here? Try to be somehow competitive by piece by piece banning the place you literally built up with your excessive imports?
@helpfulContrib - I can't reply your message directly.

I'm not trying to deny anything. I'm sure there were pockets of what we (modern) might recognise as agriculture, though not pastoralism (for obvious reasons).

My question was actually just what it looked like, an earnest question to chrisco255, replying to elmomie, about the context of their statements.

GP seemed to be talking global, and so did parent - which would make sense in the context of climate change (a global phenomenon) and also massive human population growth (also mostly global, resulting form settlements / agriculture).
So what is the difference of opt-in and opt-out here?

In both cases, they identify and scan something.

Not sure, if there is out at all.
Related, Bob Margouleff interview: https://youtu.be/553-7L9TVPU?si=wggvLWY9aF6cVzFj
It felt like we were on 3 for a long time, and then all of a sudden got 4 through 6 (and soon 7) in quick succession. I'd be curious to know what motivated that - maybe GPGPU taking off?
> literally 800 meters

FALSE -- That was an urban legend.

> "The Wuhan Institute of Virology is not 400 meters away from the Huanan seafood market. It is roughly 26,912 meters (or about 17 miles) away." ... "there are at least eight "Wuhan Disease Prevention and Control Center" locations in the Jianghan district of Wuhan (where the market is located) alone."

SNOPES: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cruz-wuhan-tweet/

The Chinese public health department has many medical clinics in cities. They do not do virus research and do not handle virus samples.
It is possible for normal everyday people to make contributions to the standards. I'm sure if you created a patch that showed these things working in firefox/webkit/chrome and wrote up a proposal and sent it to the correct listserv, you would at least have something more than baseless conspiracy to be mad about
Because you already pay a gas tax (granted, not for electric vehicles) - and because those tolls are almost always way more than required for the building and maintenance of the road.
>You can't just sit on an old piece of software and expect it to work forever because the companies do not want that.

also because users don't want that. I don't think any of us would necessarily be satisfied playing Doom 1993 on Windows 95 because 256KB of RAM is all we'll ever need.

I'm not even saying it's a bad way to live, to be honest; that's just not how user demand works. They'll inevitably want Doom 2/3/4/etc. until the franchise jumps the shark or stagnates into nothingness.

> People have plenty of reasons to not want to support companies doing this, and to be wary when they move in this direction.

Well we're both probably cynically minded here on this topic. It's equally unlikely, but I've taken the path of walking away wherever I can for companies that keep pulling off these stunts. I've more or less de-googled myself over the last year outside of mail and Youtube, for instance. At some point, consumers need to put their foot down, but they won't. How many times does it need to happen before we evaluate who's really the fool?

>Steam is relatively benevolent and now there are games you bought and paid for that require a version of windows that steam no longer supports. Maybe they just do what autodesk did, revoke your perpetual license, and tell you to buy a subscription?

Yes, that's why I don't even trust the benevolent actors for stuff I really care about. If I can find it on GOG, it's likely DRM free and I have no worries about what Steam's runtime looks like 20 years from now. The internet may flame me for that mentality, but I remember when Google was in similar acclaim, down to their long buried "Do No Evil" motto.

Again, not perfect, but the worst thing to do is dump all your eggs in one basket. Always be on the lookout for your own interests and be ready to jump.

>I am so sick of people pretending the free market of software isn't rigged against the user.

I agree with you the same way I agree that locks in an ideal world should not be required. They shouldn't be; I should have a reasonable sense of privacy, respect and security among my fellow man. an unexpected knock on the door shouldn't give me anxiety over it possibbly being an irrelevant sellsman, a crazy relative, or simply a package I forgot about.

But I'll keep my keys ready in the meantime until that ideal time comes. I can only look out for myself until then.
Humans have had to evolve to be able to communicate with each other effectively in this and far worse conditions - on battlefields, in driving hurricanes, while being stalked by other humans (and animals), yelling across vast distances, over raging rivers, while wounded, sick, etc.

Humans can generally figure it out eventually.
ReScript eventually emerged out of the whole reason deal and is worth looking into. It targets JS runtimes so uses arrays instead of lists as the main sequence data structure. Uses the "normal" JS syntax for array, has no linked list literal though.
My understanding is that 25-30% of all credit card customers are deadbeats. I've worked with some fintech companies and that number came up in some discussions. I cannot, however, find a corroborating source.
I agree, plus they at one point had a whole damn
older preserved Asgard. That and how rushed they made their end of that particular story in the last episode made me hate it.
Zouxian: A Solution for Bypassing Xcode LLM Restriction in Mainland China
It is not so much a drop in quality as there are tasks that every model above a certain threshold will perform equally.

Most can do 2+2 = 4.

One test prompt I use on LLMs is asking it to produce a JavaScript function that takes an ImageData object and returns a new ImageData object with an all direction Sobel edge detection. Quite a lot of even quite small models can generate functions like this.

In general, I don't even think this is a question that needs to be answered. A lot of API providers have different quality/price tiers. The fact that people are using the different tiers should be sufficient to show that at least some people are finding cases where cheaper models are good enough.
That mistake is that it's not true. Altman has earned a name for himself in the truth-telling/transparency department. He wasn't briefly sacked for his fashion sense.

In the article they quote Marc Fagel, who previously served as the regional director for the SEC's office in San Francisco:

"Misstating the qualifications of executives is something the SEC takes seriously,"
For anyone who might not be aware, this is true for most companies. Any changes to your plan will usually require the removal of any grandfathered features, regardless of what the tier 1 CSR tells you.
Systemantics:
Regardless of why they were created systems exist to perpetuate themselves.
Do you find your domain of thought shifts when you do not think with language? For example, do you feel you are able to do complex reasoning without language?
It’s a real problem. The solution is just to isolate each service on its own subdomain. The only thing that should be listed in your top level SPF record is the corporate email for the domain.
Do you prefer lions or tigers? BBQ sauce or ketchup? Green or blue?

I bet you can answer all of these at a moment's notice, but where does your answer come from? Have you ever sat down and tried to reason out which one you like more? Or do you just 'know' the answer and then 'come up' with the justification afterwards?

People can think in words, but it's certainly not their only way of thinking. I think the thinking in words is kind of like "thinking on paper" where you're trying to explicitly reason through something. The thinking process itself seems to be something on a deeper level.
You skipped the worst part. Things are great now. I wonder how big corps are gonna ruin them this time.
Seems that Arc-AGI is more flawed rather than GPT-4o is more AGI.

Maybe a AI version of Hanlons Razor. Never attribute to AGI what could be easily explained by being in the training set.
I think delays, within reason, are not an issue. Delays are very common in spaceflight. As long as they're delivering a high quality product for a decent price, some delays are acceptable. So far, I think ULA has been within reason on that front.
I'm highly suspicious that the whole "inner vs no-inner monologue" thing doesn't actually exist and has more to do with these things being extremely hard to explain using language, and people describing their subjective experience in subtly different ways.
That's really the distinction the whole "just use HTML + serverside" crowd glosses over.

As soon as you have the need for complex UI interfaces (anything beyond a multi-select box and modals) in the browser, which almost every serious SaaS app requires at some point, you're going to need complex JS components.

I still think its crazy to use React/Vue beyond very isolated components of functionality and 100% simple server side should be the default unless absolutely necessary. But that's why the frontend industry is already moving to 'islands' of complex JS that is SSR by default.

That said, there still seems to be a high burden of adoption of SSR "islands", where you have these complex frameworks like Rewind/Next that still assume React/Vue as the composition of server side views instead of just pieces of the page.

Which is probably why so many sites end up with a TON of JS views that are unneeded. Because frontend devs are in their own world/dev enviornment. We really need React/Vue SRR+hydration that blends well into Rails/Python/etc frameworks without needing to commit heavily.
How many different locations would you like it to spread from? Wuhan is actually a large transit hub for bringing in wet-market animals from all over southern China and many foreign sources, including Laos where the BANAL covid virus was found.

When SARS broke out in 2002 the first case
was an animal handler in a town 50 miles from Hong Kong. The initial spread of the SARS
virus infected farm workers, butcher shop workers, grocery store
workers, and people at farmers markets, just like the wet market in
Wuhan 17 years later. There were no virus labs anywhere near Foshan
(upriver of Hong Kong). The 2002 SARS epidemic started from natural
animal-to-human transmission, in an animal-handling complex, with a naturally occurring
coronavirus.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SARS#Outbreak_in_South_China
> If you are business open to the public you should serve the public. The slippery slope is beyond obvious. Can a doctor refuse to treat gay patients? A lawyer refuse to represent gay clients? A professor refuse to teach gay students?

If many businesses were doing that, that would be pretty bad, yeah. But the activist demands go far beyond that. Masterpiece Cakeshop and 303 Creative LLC weren't sued for refusing to serve gay clients—they were perfectly willing to serve gay clients! What they were sued for was refusing to provide services that would express support for a specific event—a gay wedding. It's like the difference between refusing to sell cakes to white people, and refusing to bake a cake for a white nationalist event.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masterpiece_Cakeshop_v._Colora...

> simply isn't something that exists.

Quick internet search:

https://www.latimes.com/socal/daily-pilot/news/story/2022-06...

Excerpts from the book in question: https://thedaughter.substack.com/p/34th-filthybooks-example-...
Probably not a popular answer but: leetcode

Put in a couple months of effort (less if you're not as slow as me) to rememorize how to do those problems, and then apply them in any interview for any company that does leetcode questions.
Have you checked out Haiku? https://www.haiku-os.org/
The Most Exhausting Restoration I've Ever Made – Soviet Computer Control Panel
No one is saying that. People are starting to realize is that JavaScript frameworks are an unnecessary complexity to web application development. People have been seriously turned off by things like angular and react, and with good reason. With the advent of things like hotwire and htmx those JS frameworks are no longer strictly necessary, and many people welcome the news that their importance is fading away.

I’m one of them.
While that’s basically what all this stuff really does under the covers, it doesn’t feel “react-y” to me.

Using JSX does. Especially for stuff like meta tags where there can be a couple in force at once.

I’m not going to argue it’s perfect but it seems like it fits in to me. It’s basically acting like the restrictions on where the title and meta tags can go no longer apply so you can just sprinkle them wherever they hopefully belong in your app. And react takes care of putting them in the right spot.

> Very little of what react does seems reasonable to me though.

So are you someone who dislikes it in general and just using this as one more argument?

I’d be very curious to see the opinion of someone who likes react who thinks this is a bad idea.
Did you listen to what Chollet said? How much of LLM improvements are due to enlarging the training sets to cover more problems and how much is due to any emergent properties?
Hey, tap4 ai tools directory is useful. I have deployed an ai tools directory with the open-source project.
What's your future plan about tap4 ai?
I've noticed myself doing this myself. I thought it was just because I also have sleep apnea, so what's causing me to stop breathing when I sleep is also happening when I'm waking and engaged on the computer.

Didn't consider that it might be as widespread as the article is suggesting.
If someone in your generation (graduating high school 2009) obtained in demand credentials or skills, then they should have reaped enormous returns from 2013 to 2024.

The only people who really “lost” in 2008 were those who were overleveraged from going into debt for houses or education, and then had to default due to income loss in 2008 to 2011 or so. Or those who panic sold all their equities.
> And I explained why this equivalence doesn't hold in my view.

No you didn't.

> Instead of trying to convince me or explore our disagreement, you declare that I violated unstated terms and that the discussion cannot proceed.

No I didn't.

> Since it's clear you aren't willing to give me a fair hearing, I encourage you to show this conversation to someone you respect and trust to be honest with you, so that they can explain this to you in a way that will register.

Right back at you.
Much less effort to build a language (without megacorp backing) if you're building off a battle tested runtime.

I'm absolutely not saying this to discredit the work that's gone into Clojure, Elixir et al, but it does lend credence to the idea of building for an existing ecosystem instead of bootstrapping your own (along with "seamless" interop as a first class concern)

If anyone can crack seamless interop between natively compiled languages to dodge ABI hell they'll earn a nice place in history
Is there still a future for navigation sites now? AI search can give me all I need.
Definitely not true for me. I had a windows pc and mac laptop for years (as well as Linux home and work servers), but when it came time to replace the laptop I switched to windows, mostly because it's more configurable. Also integrates better with my Android phone, which I prefer to iOS for similar reasons.
Ok please remind me when the SEC takes action.
Just went there two weeks ago. The main exhibit was horrifying. The special exhibit you mention was even worse if that's possible. These kids just living their lives as written in their diaries and then the unthinkable happened to them.
Haven't developed an opinion about iterators yet but generics are a godsend for writing libraries. The first time I attempted to create a database toolkit for Golang I quickly abandoned it because of limitations with the type system. My first attempt post-generics, REM, went much more smoothly. Been enthusiastically working on a follow-up privately. I honestly don't think I would be writing much Golang without generic types.
Cocaine dealers work similarly right ? The first ones are free so that you get addicted and come back for more when you have to pay for it.
Depends on how rich you are.
Are you sure? Why the tools directory is useful? I basically don't use it.