skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is known as the Gell-Mann amnesia effect [0].

[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Crichto...
One night in the late 1990s, lying on the grass in a garden in Palo Alto, CA, I saw, with the naked eye, three satellites flying in formation. I believe what I saw was: https://www.satobs.org/noss.html#NOSS2
To be clear, I agree with you in principal - I think unsupervised children on the internet is a horrible idea, I just draw the line short of legislating that.

I'm not looking forward to when mine are old enough to realistically need to start using the internet, and wish that I could put them on dial-up text-mode internet like I grew up on instead of this ad-filled garbage we have today... But that's on me I suppose.
Nahin's book is a great read. I thought the page would be about that.
Streambased – free, serverless service for running analytics on streaming data
Ime these are always "write-only" documents. Sitting in PowerPoint on a SharePoint drive somewhere, never to be read...
How does the model gets trained?
Any measure? ChatGPT still can’t solve a sudoku, let alone do any form of reasoning. It’s more of a search engine than “intelligence”, while humans obviously can reason and solve novel tasks.
Oh yes, taking agriculture back to where it was 2 centuries ago, when there definitely weren't any famines at all.
It doesn't say specifically, but I think these lasted more than a day, assuming you'll accept random predator species as a sufficient proof-of-concept substitute for mice which have to do many similar things but smaller:

https://www.televisual.com/news/behind-the-scenes-spy-in-the....
https://www.t-online.de/finanzen/boersen-news/id_100429438/d...

> „Seit 2023 betreiben wir nun einen Bitcoin-Node und auch Bitcoin-Lightning-Nodes, und voller Stolz möchte ich ein kleines Geheimnis verraten: Wir werden bald in die digitale monetäre Photosynthese einsteigen“, so Röder.

deepl.com translation:

> "We have been operating a Bitcoin node since 2023 and also Bitcoin Lightning Nodes, and proudly I would like to reveal a little secret: We will soon be entering the digital monetary photosynthesis," says Röder.
It's capped at the outstanding loan balance (principle plus any interest due)
What an absurd idea. What is it with the tech field and formalising every last bit of interaction? It is fundamentally dehumanising.
I use Firefox so I don't really have a meaningful experience with Chrome. What I can tell you is that any time I open the matrix of uMatrix (it's one click on the toolbar) I often see a zillion of sites and potential script and XHR requests. Only a few are really needed to display the content of page or even to make some complex UI work. In almost no case blocking the scripts for telemetry, error reporting, etc break the page.

So I wonder how much unnecessary information people using Chrome leak to those sites and the third parties that receive, log and possibly sell those data.
Noone said they wanted to see pictures. Only to know their nature.

This is a valid request. Insinuations can be inserted anywhere, e.g. to drive clicks, so verification is good practice.
VPN and seedboxes are two options. Basically, use some 3rd party as the interface and hope they don't keep logs.
I don’t think it is. Gnome is usable without this behavior that, as it states in the repo description, is mostly an attempt to replicate the behavior of windows or KDE. This can be good for some users, but Gnomes goal is not to replicate other DEs, but to create a good user experience.

The default gnome dock behaves differently, but is (mostly) usable without this extension, just via different patterns. If you expect to have a desktop that consistently behaves like KdE, you’re probably better off switching to KDE (which is funny given some LDE users rice their desktops to almost look like gnome).
A Chatbot Helped Me Talk to My Dead Mother
He Got Schizophrenia. He Got Cancer. and Then He Got Cured
There is a theory that humanoids aren't actually unique, if there's large animals on other planets in the universe. Our body plan has several survival advantages so it's quite possible evolution could have had similar results elsewhere. Bipedalism is really great for efficiency of locomotion (humans can walk really really far), and having two limbs with opposable thumbs is really useful for grasping and manipulating, which makes it much more likely that species will invent tools and technology.

Note I'm not claiming humanoids are all over the place, but with 400B stars in our galaxy, 1T stars in Andromeda next door, and other galaxies with similarly huge numbers of stars, multiplied by all the number of galaxies in the observable universe, multiplied by the number of exoplanets in the "Goldilocks zone", it's quite possible intelligent, humanoid life has evolved somewhere out there.
>I think chrome has better security model, sandboxing...

It also worth to mention that Firefox is built with Rust, and Chrome mostly C/C++.
Similarly, as a Brit, the tone and humour is not unusual at all. Feels like someone blowing off steam down the pub with their mates.

It is totally lost on many here, some of whom equivocate the rant with serious threats of violence.

Personally I found it very funny and an accurate portayal of industry trends
I like that a text by Pliny is dated as 2010
As is often the case almost anywhere in the world, there's a major US military base nearby. In this case it's Diego Garcia, and is absolutely huge:

https://veteranlife.com/military-history/diego-garcia/

"The base is home to thousands of American troops, sophisticated radar, space tracking, and a communications facility."
Practically, the number of people infected with 0-day drive bys vs the number of computers compromised by exploiting the user is insignificant. A browser that helps me concentrate is _MUCH_ safer.
I'd say never because no sane medical professional will be operating or doing any procedure on "some CD from somewhere", pretty much the same with mailing that out.

They want scans/tests from trusted source to make decisions about person health/life. The only thing they can trust is whatever they have close and used for years.

If there is no time to get a new scan/test I think there is no time to download stuff or wait for someone to email things.
Bun is much faster than Node.js 22 at decoding Base64 but both rely on same lib
From the UK, after the elsevier link it goes to https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X2...
For Chrome, you have to deal with Google.

For Firefox, you have to worry about the next "pocket", or the next "Mr. Robot"...

Manifest v3 is looming as well.

Six of one, half a dozen of the other. /shrug
You don't need to mix logic with templates. I just produce a context (result from database queries and some such) and pass it to a function that produces HTML from the data in the context. The data must not be changed in the templating function. This is something I try to avoid as well in order to maintain separation of concerns in the backend code.

Edit for clarification: The context holds the data that is rendered as-is by the templating function. So any transformations from the "raw" database data and the context data happens beforehand and the templating function just turns it into HTML.
That’s exactly the opposite of what thermal drones are use most of the other time
If it is in fact just orange cornstarch then you’ve gone to plaid.

If you were actually terrorized by a megalith being very briefly orange then you’ve also gone off the deep end.
> The folks you've worked with are looking for something they can take without giving back.

I think if you're going to make an accusation like that, the only morally sound way to do it is to that person's face. Since you haven't done that, I'll disregard what you've said. As should others.

> GPL is like

You've mistaken me for someone arguing against the GPL. I love all the GPL'd software I use daily. Especially the ones I wrote.

These days I enjoy working with Rust in part because of the language and community, and in part because I get to choose the terms I license the resulting code under. The folks who write me paychecks appreciate it too.

I wish you luck in your advocacy efforts.
If you expect a spaniard to feel guilt over something Carlos I did. Maybe we should talk about who Carlos I was.
I only use Firefox, I haven't open Chrome in months... But I try to stay away from Google most of the time, so probably not the best.

And as some other people it's better Firefox on Android than the app. I don't have to deal with adds on Firefox, the official app always have 2 or 4 adds waiting for the next video
I will make a controversial comment:

My experience is that security is a function of simplicity and individuals having a complete understanding of the code and implications of changes.

Implications:

- A smaller team will generally lead to more secure software than a larger team.

- Many security layers are counterproductive.

In studies, bugs per KLOC are relatively consistent. A 100-line program can be fully auditable. One with a JIT in a virtual machine in a sandbox looks, on paper, more secure. In practice:

- There are many more places to introduce bugs.

- Beyond some level of complexity, it's impossible to understand the security model holistically.

- Bugs often cut across layers

- Layers are often used as an excuse ("We'll leave this, since that other layer will catch it).

Layers can be okay if they're well-understood, analyzed, and well-documented (e.g. postfix). However, the vast majority of the time, they're not. People pointing to bigger workforce or sandboxes in Chrome aren't selling me. It only takes one idiot.... And for sandboxes? I've never seen a clean block diagram of the Chrome security model.

To be clear: I'm not arguing which browser is more secure -- simply that the arguments in this thread don't sell me.
most technology is dual or multiple use, starting with a rock or knife...

so it is up to the fabric of our society and everyone involved in dealing with the technology, how the rules and boundaries are set.

that there will be military use is obvious. However, it is naive to think one can avoid military use by others by not enabling oneself for it.
Or no feint necessary. "Continue to do your incompetent best".
“Ah you think mathematics are your ally? You merely adopted mathematics. I was born in it, molded by it. I didn't see physics or biology until I was already an undergrad, by then it was nothing to me but blinding!”
My take, it’s obvious that Brave is more private than Chrome - with Google being the biggest advertising company in the world;

And since “private” and “secure” are correlated…
Such Ado: The Fight for Shakespeare's Puns (2016)
Let's say China realize they're behind in the SI race. They may have achieved AGI, but only barely, while the US may be getting close to ASI takeoff.

Now let's assume they're able to quickly build a large datacenter far underground, complete with a few nuclear reactors and all spare parts, etc, needed. Even a greenhouse (using artificial light) big enough to feed 1000 people.

But they realize that their competitors are about to create ASI at a level that will enable them to completely overrun all of China with self-replicating robots within 100 days.

In a situation, the leadership MAY decide to enter those caves alongside a few soldiers and the best AI researchers, and then simply nuke all US data centers (that are presumably above ground), as well as any other data center that could be a threat, worldwide.

And by doing that, they may (or at least may think) they can buy enough time to win the ASI race, at the cost of a few billion people.

Would they do it? Would we?
I don't have much problems (Firefox on Mac) but seeing how many others complain I guess it is just a matter of time before I get moved to another A/B testing "experiment" testing how much I can endure before I give up and switch to Chrome (it won't happen).

Seeing how many of the users report the problem goes away if they let Firefox report as Chrome I personally am rather sure this is intentionally from Googles side:

Yes, I believe there are some real bugs, but I also think Google do take advantage of "useful" bugs to force us over to Chrome.

So I have decided to put my money where my mouth is and since last month I am a nebula subscriber. I am also considering Patreon.

Please consider doing the same, and please do write competition authorities in your country and do ask about when they will look into Googles rampant abuse of market position.
So the pass must be running at 1500 FPS (flies per second)
Considering “recycling”, at least of plastics, in the UK has been an alternative bin that feeds an incinerator or a landfill for years since China and the Philippines stopped accepting trash colonialism, I very much doubt they could.
> Firefox is eons more private than Chrome - or any of it's based browsers - can ever be

Some progress is made though...

Brave: https://brave.com

Thorium: https://github.com/Alex313031/thorium
Others in this case generally being corporations and rich folk
i mean that is ok but i do not want them using open source commons without any contribution. it is not a logic thing. i just hate oss being basically abused in that way
That's an important factor. Chrome now restricts "ad blockers", but those protect from more than ads.
'Encryption is deeply threatening to power': Meredith Whittaker of Signal
Yes, I don't get why people always tend to drift into thinking in extremes when it comes to new tech. Like when using htmx or similar tech you would absolutely need to implement every piece of logic in the backend.

Well, you don't. I have been very successful using htmx by using it only in interactions that make changes to my data, that is state. Other user interactions (e.g. strictly visual interactions) remain on the client.
Thanks for the link! Looks promising.
Nope, this isn't pushed by the government, but legal circumstances here allow for cheap and automated detection and extortion of "offenders". I assume the right holder are making deals with big law firms specialized in the "Abmahnungs-Business", allowing them to track "offenders" on their behalf. Law firms then threaten to sue at courts sympathetic to rightholders, extort the "offenders" and give kickbacks to the rightholders.
No I haven't read it as I don't have a WaPo subscription anymore.

So someone is sending free textile shipments to Africa?

How is the demand "artificial", is someone masquerading as buyers?

So is it about environmental issues, is it about protectionism, both?
Reason number 256 to never run Linux on any of your personal computers.
I wonder what's the standard of "big" in these context--for example I always thought that some million rows is a very big, but only recently learned that it's a size that RDBMS such as PostgreSQL can handle it with no problem.
Shadcn or Magic UI but for Vapi. This new library allows devs to drop in stunning UX into their web apps and paste pre-defined serverless functions that integrate Vapi. Devs just need to define env variables and can ship AI voice agents easily and beautifully.
Smile grimly and carry on. At least they're not trying to shoehorn blockchain in everywhere anymore.
Setting foot on the moon, splitting the atom and transmuting elements, curing incurable diseases like genetic blindness and spinal atrophy...

> doubling human lifespans

This is partly a statistical effect of greatly reducing infant mortality (which used to be as bad as 50%) but even that is mind-blowing.
Sorry to harp on.

So you had a list of products (what sort - I am thinking like widgets from a wholesaler and you want to have a three tier menu for an e-commerce site?)

I am guessing each product has a description - like from Amazon, and chatgpt read the description and said “aha this is a Television/LCD/50inch or Underwear/flimsy/bra

I assume you sent in 200,000 different queries - but how did you get it to return three tiers? (Maybe I need to read one of those “become a ChatGPt expert” blogs
You can add https://www.irradiatedsoftware.com/sizeup/ - commercial though
>If the latter, I suppose we could instead say our destination is where we calculate the planet will be four years from now. Except that my travel time was instantaneous, so again either I've arrived too early and need to wait around for four years, or I jumped 4 years into the future (at which point that's not really FTL travel, just kind of stepping outside of time into some nether state for four years).

This doesn't make sense. If you have a wormhole teleporter, and teleport to where that 4ly-away planet is in your observation, it won't be there, since you saw it 4 years ago and it's moved. This seems fairly obvious.

Now, if you observe its motion and predict where it's traveled in the 4 years between your observation (now) and when the photons you saw started from that planet (4y ago, relative to your current position in spacetime), and set your wormhole teleporter to take you there instead, it should take you to the planet's current position. (Hopefully your calculations were accurate and you don't teleport into the planet...) I don't see why you think you'd arrive too early, or jump into the future. Your friend who stays behind would need to wait 4 years to see you arrive at the planet in your super-telescope, but that's just because it takes light that long to arrive.

I don't see how this particular thought experiment necessitates time travel.
I don't know about the name: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RADIUS
Depends on what you mean by “true free will” really.
Thank you. Few people really seem to acknowledge the name.
Yes,

Specially Brave (within the Chromium-spectrum only) is probably one of the best choices (if we ignore some details, of course...)

Still, i actually have more faith in servo: https://servo.org
No. The mouse would just be a mouse. It wouldn't learn anything, because it's a mouse. It might chew on some of the books. Meanwhile, transformers do learn things, so there is obviously more to it than just the quantity of data.

(Why spend a mouse? Just sit a strawberry in a library, and if the hypothesis holds that the quantity of data is the only thing that matters holds, you'll have a super intelligent strawberry)
HTMX doc is good as a reference, but not as a tutorial.

This book is the missing tutorial, and it's been very useful to me. It even lead to the "A little taste of HTMX" series (https://www.bitecode.dev/p/a-little-taste-of-htmx-part-1).

After a year of using HTMX, I really like it and would encourage everybody to give it a try.

It's nice for:

- internal tools

- midly dynamic websites

It's not great for any web page you stay a long time on mobile on, though. I made a web app with it, and on my phone, you can't handle the fact the browser plays against you if you stay a long time with a tab open and goes in and out of the app. You really need a lot of control in JS for that.

Also: don't try to avoid JS using it. It's a mistake many people do, and that's not how you get the best out of it.

I regularly sparkle a little vanilla js or alpine in my htmx websites to make them nicer. And in some cases, I even have one lone page that loads a full vue/react because that particular section needs to be way more dynamic. It's not an XOR. You have now a whole spectrum of how dynamic and how much work you want to put in.

Sometimes, I don't write JS at all, but it's not a requirement.
They kinda do, via sattelite pings, radar, etc. Whether they have radar coverage is another matter. I'm confident they have coverage all along the US coast and military bases, but other areas are temporary, like the AWACS flying over UN territory looking into Russia and Ukraine to provide the Ukrainians with intel (one from the French air force flying over Romania: https://apnews.com/article/ukraine-russia-surveillance-defen... and another over Poland: https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/flying-with-nato-awacs-1.66194...)
Maths is just unreasonably effective shamanism: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39220159

The 童乩 is interesting because there, like in vodoun (or the Iliad!), the spirit world is the high impedance side: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haitian_Vodou#:~:text=to%20inv...

I wonder to what degree southern US charismatic christianity owes its peculiarities (glossolalia, etc.) to proximity to whatever practices predated vodoun?

[When I was young, we were supposed to "leave room for the Holy Spirit" at dances. That Holy Spirit sure got around, because even on the other side of The Wall, the godless commie young pioneers were supposed to leave 50cm for it: https://avatars.dzeninfra.ru/get-zen_doc/1866022/pub_63343bd... ]
I'm not sure who you are talking to, I didn't say anything about Apple not keeping up with Unix standards.
If military capabilities are secret then whatever they might be able to detect will not be passed on to the public because that would obviously inform adversaries about those capabilities. Remember Trump's gaffe when he shown satellites pictures of some Iranian facilities taken by a secret satellite...

As others have commented, there is also a difference between ultra-high definition pictures of precise locations and sweeping entire oceans.
Not OP (and late to the game), but searching his handle led me to
https://xakpc.info/series/htmx-dotnet
I'm assuming that you're referring to the fact that if you get the data as JSON from the server side, you can use it to render out your multiple visualisations. If this is not what you're getting at, my apologies.

If you send the HTML table over the wire, you can use it as the datasource for the other visualisations, same as you would with JSON. You can extend it with `data-` attributes if necessary to get some extra machine-readable information in there, but I have not needed to do that yet.

On the application I'm currently working on, we do this and then have a listener on the htmx event to turn the table into a d3.js graph. It works pretty well, and has the advantage that if someone is using our application with JavaScript turned off, they still get the table with all the data.
Walking Coffee Table
I’ve also had that bug happen, not sure why it isn’t happening anymore though…

I think it happened when not rebooting my Macbook for a long time and only with fullscreen windows, and i’d simply restart Contexts. But yea it was annoying indeed. Note that it might also be one of the many Apple macOS (api) bugs…
> Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? -- That is my biggest concern.

Latin-phrase compulsion is not the worst disease that could happen to a man.
> i actually have more faith in servo: https://servo.org

Together with RedoxOS, COSMIC EPIC, and coreutils in Rust -- the future holds such great potential :)
Long Island Iced Tea renamed to Long Island Blockchain for a stock price bump.
It would be useful to understand how Bun avoids the same problem with it's JS engine... my guess is that it provides this API directly, via a zig implementation, and leaves the JS engine completely out of it.

If so, then node can take exactly the same strategy.
- (2018)

- https://archive.md/XqvCU
10% of a couple of billions users is still a massive absolute amount of users.
You are ignoring the elephant in the room, so to speak. Apple has a large share of mobile browser usage with Safari (a Webkit browser). Add to this also that any browser used on iOS is webkit.

That aside, what you are asking is really just you giving your personal preference of a browser and if we agree.
Not GP, but I would imagine "another checker to scan the results" would be another NN classifier.

Thinking being that you'd compare outputs of the two, and under assumption of the results being statistically independent from each other and of similar quality, say 1% difference between the two in said comparison, would suggest ~ 0.5% error rate from "ground truth".
Both browsers are very large, very old software. Both companies are big enough to support fast response to exploits. There’s really nothing technical you can point out that makes one more secure. Firefox scores better on privacy which tips the scales towards Firefox.