skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> as a tiny number of instructions

specifically 1
If working with object oriented languages, I recommend https://www.poodr.com/

Practical Object-Oriented Design, An Agile Primer Using Ruby (POODR)
An old Japanese book about TETRIS. Written in 1989, the first year the game was available outside of USSR, by Tsunekazu Ishihara—who went on to create Pokémon!
Framework didn't do anything. They're just announcing what somebody else did, which was to make a motherboard that has a RISC-V processor in it, which fit a Framework laptop.
That's just not true. Maybe you could whip something up that could detect a bike under select circumstances, but a robust system that could actually be used as a tool is a much harder project.
Phones in the classroom are clearly a distraction and should be disallowed. Phones in school seem mostly harmless and provide clear benefits.

I'm not saying "do nothing", I'm just not seeing a case anywhere of why phones in schools but not during class are "fucking up" anything.

You can make a serious case for banning phones in school as the easiest way to enforce banning phones in classrooms, and accepting the tradeoffs that this implies. But you can't just dismiss the fact that many people (myself included) see there being serious benefits of having access to phones outside the classroom setting without first addressing those arguments.
Banking apps won't work with Lindroid either: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40714796
Sure, I didn't claim it did. It says something significant about their confidence in it.
Absolutely. I see you didn’t get much traction here. You could try the DBA Stack Exchange. Or talk to the vendors.
The number of ludicrous "security theater" stories in the linked thread go a long way to explaining why nuclear power is so expensive. My favorite is the delivery guy who had his clothes confiscated. I wonder if it was always this ridiculous or if it's a post-9/11 thing.
We have a joint daily account (called a "current account" in the UK, maybe a checking account in the US?). Both our income goes into that in full. We then have a few different types of savings which come out as soon as the income goes in. This is a more flexible "easy access" account, and more of an investment account. The investment account isn't joint purely because of how the tax shielding for them work in the UK but we both have access to them.

The remaining amount in the daily account is used for bills, groceries, and such. We also have a budget in here for various social things like dinners out and such as we do a lot of these together.

We then have an individual checking account which we both take an equal monthly allowance for discretionary spending. This is also how we buy gifts for each other for birthdays and Christmas.
Apple Suspends Work on Next High-End Headset, Focused on Cheaper Model for 2025
>> I'd describe it as a stream of thought, not bound to any language.

as it's your head i accept that at face value. However i couldn't possibly understand how that could possibly work. How do you think not in a language not in words? What are the "atoms" of stream of thought for you, is it picture based, or???

My head talks to me all day long, unprovoked, uncontrolled by myself and in english. i can certainly interrupt and quiet it if i like, but i just am doing something ordinary and notice that i'm mentally talking to myself.

As a corrolary... when you read a book, what is that experience like? do you have a reader reading the book to you? Do you 'hear' words as they are read. I don't mean audibly, but is a story told to you as you read? To me this journaller is very similar to what i sense when i read a book, altho obviously it's not surprising in the book reading sense.
> Besides which, "having access to a cellphone" did not alter the outcome at all in those tragic incidents.

Disagree. Being able to communicate to your family or emergency services that a shooting is happening and/or that you are safe or not is invaluable.
htmx 1.9.12 was 44kb:

https://bundlephobia.com/package/htmx.org@1.9.12

and 2.0.0 was 45.3:

https://bundlephobia.com/package/htmx.org@2.0.0-beta4

i think that the better web components support blew is up a little. there is a reasonable amount of fat we can cut around IE support that is still in there, planning on doing so over the next few months & slowly

17ms over emerging 4G (and hopefully cached forever after that) doesn't freak me out too much
Rail now accounts for less than 10% of domestic freight traffic by weight, and less than 15% that of truck. Considering how much more cost-efficient rail is (and how much cheaper the infrastructure is), that's pretty bad. It's a slow death, but rail freight remains flat at best while total freight continues to increase.
:) great to hear
Yes, almost never happens.

Your link shows ~600 people injured or killed in school shootings, across every possible education level (from kindergarten to college) in the course of 24 years. (Both injured and killed, the number actually killed is more like a quarter to a third of that).

That's an average of 25 people killed or injured per year.

Taking enrollment numbers from 2021 (https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publicatio...) , it shows that in a given year, ~80 million people are enrolled in those same school levels.

That puts the odd of being injured or killed in a school shooting (if you're currently in school) at 1 in 3,200,000 per year.

So yes, odds of one in three million of your child being involved is "almost never happens".
Most people who end up in this extreme predicament are not because of luck. It's because of a series of bad decisions. Often if it's too extreme, it's because the person cannot make the best decision due to some mental health issues. So I would seek help there if you are able to get on your feet.
I think we are really more on the same page than not on the actual conditions of the economy, but I would add that to me "Vibecession" carries an undercurrent that is is used to make fun of and to quiet the people thinking the economy is bad. Often accompanied by citation of overall positive economic metrics which has disconnects from individual economic security. I think the core problem that media calling it a vibecession is basically acting intentionally blind to the effects of inequality.
It’s extremely unlikely a given kid will be present at all during any kind of shooting at school, the vast majority of which aren’t indiscriminate killings and which may not involve students or staff at all (a shooting that just happens to take place with at least one involved party standing on school property)—over all 13 years of k-12 school.

I ran the numbers and it was firmly in “not even worth a thought” territory. I cast the net of the definition of “school shooting” as wide as remotely reasonable, and made the criterion present at the building for, not hurt or killed, and it was still not worth worrying about.

The odds are even better in the kinds of schools HNers are likely to send their kids to, since a ton of those shootings are drug- and/or gang-related.
I realize no one would be allowed to tell me if I am correct, but this tech sounds like it is perfect for military use. I am guessing there is already a pretty polished version of this roaming the oceans now.
Clickable website link: https://manish.codes
I'll put in as much effort in my rebutal as was shown in the initial false statement (very little). In the 60/70s there was this idea that dopaminergic populations of neurons (of which there are many with different roles, but here lets simply talk about the mesolimbic populations in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and nucleus accumbens (NAc). Early electrophysiological studies found that activiating these populations could lead to animal models doing whatever was necessary to get them stimulated again. This lead to the idea of dopamine as the "pleasure chemical". But since then it's been found that in the VTA and (shell of) the NAc the dopaminergic populations don't actually encode for pleasure or reward at all. The reward/pleasure is mediated almost entirely by glutamergic neurons in the NAc, and the dopaminergic projections there from the VTA encode for belief in possible future reward, not reward itself. Dopamine is wanting (prediction of liking), not liking.

Furthermore, the idea that screens are a special type of stimuli that can directly bypass the senses and act like a dopaminergic drug to increase incentive salience (wanting) without there being intrinsic pleasure to the stimuli is absurd and unsupported magical thinking. It needs no special disproval; the burden of proof is on such a wild unphysical claim. Screens are not, and cannot be "addictive". That word has a medical meaning and it does not cover screens. You may object and say, "But what of gambling?" to which I respond, the DSM5+ and ICD10 both have it as "gambling disorder" because it's not an addiction and it's a grandfathered in disorder at that; all by itself. Additionally, the DSM spent the last decade addressing the potential issue of "screens" and each commitee returned with the same conclusion: not enough evidence for inclusion (latest was 2022).

If you really do want to learn the nitty gritty details and see the references I suggest starting with Kent Berridge's lab on affective neuroscience and his review papers, https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/berridge-lab/publications/
We don't have any form of combined finances, each of us deposits our money directly into our own private bank accounts and has our own credit cards. While we, in theory, have access to each other's accounts for the purpose of survivorship; in practice we would never use that access and would consider it a violation of our relationship agreement should a partner chose to use that access.

We split bills though. I take large expenses, like rent and insurance and they take smaller expenses like groceries and dining out. At the start of the year we do a budget of what we project expenses to be based on the prior year (usually takes an hour or so because we both keep good financial records). We then divide that down into a monthly payment such that we're each contributing 50% of our living expenses and they transfer money to me monthly since I'm paying the larger share of the bills. At the end of the year when we budget for the next year we reconcile any differences between budget and reality so that we do in-fact each pay 50% of the living expenses (sometimes this means I give them money, sometimes they give me money). For really large one-off expenses we nominate a partner to take on that expense and the other transfers their share of the money for that expense to the partner taking on the expense. Same story for vacations or trips except we settle that after the fact not before.

It's basically made money a non-issue in our relationship. Their money is theirs and my money is mine, what we chose to do with it is up to us so long as we're contributing our fair share of the living expenses.

Edit: since others are saying this, our relationship is very close and we consider ourselves to be a team but we very explicitly decided when forming our relationship to not have combined finances even though we cohabitate because we had observed that to be a deep point of contention in relationships around us.
You are using "Social Media" in the vague and scary sense that I am specifically arguing against here. One reason that I haven't dug deeper into Haidt's work other than listening to him argue for it on podcasts is that he does not appear to address the specific nuance that I'm referring to here.
Thanks for the kind words! You can also see the documentation/examples for {rayrender}, the pathtracer I wrote for R, here:

https://www.rayrender.net

And the rasterizer/mesh manipulation package {rayvertex} here:

https://www.rayvertex.com
yep, it's an interesting idea

we are planning on implementing a minimalist version of alex's ideas from "The Birth & Death of htmx" talk as a POC for people to look at too.
A vote for Elon's bonus doesn't cost the shareholders anything until the Delaware courts hear the appeal. A vote against could tank the stock based on Elon's threats. It might seem absurd too have such a short term view, but fund managers probably think they can get out before a price drop.
This would be super cool. I don’t know if it would have any actual use in industry. But it would be really neat for people learning MPI/cluster computing. He said, while waiting for a run to go through SLURM.
> any generator. For example, the classic range

`range` is not a generator.

Regarding number 8, instead of `Counter` you can also use dicts:

`unique = list(dict.from_keys(iterable))`
:) thank you i hope you continue to find htmx useful
I imagine you have gotten this advice before, but IMO a high yield savings probably makes sense. Say keep 10k in checking for bills, and then the other 40k in high yield. It will more than easily pay for the safe deposit box!

For myself we have joint everything, and then purchases over a certain threshold we need each others permission.
Female Founders Conference applications are open now
I hope some students or parents either sued or physically forced their property back into their possession. School teachers are the most authoritarian group of people that society gives a free pass to and I don’t get why the HN crowd loves to lick their boots.
Elisabeth Kubler-Ross's original conception on the 5 stages of grief was not a linear process where one progress from one stage to the next, ending in acceptance. Rather, it was meant as a way to start a conversation and gain a bit of self-awareness of the process. That helps start putting some of that shattered glass back together.
That's interesting, I just tested those on my machine and they all work great. I guess it should be taken off the examples list though lol
> using nuclear bombs to "puff up" the atmosphere [...] plausible plan

My fuzzy impression from [1] is even the high-order-100x density increase of solar/geomagnetic storms has limited impact on lifetime (above low-LEO where there's no need). Summer day vs winter night variability is already like 10x. I'm struggling to picture high-altitude explosions raising enough mass to do more.

[1] slide 12 on https://swfound.org/media/207065/02_bruinsma.pdf "THERMOSPHERE DENSITY
AND UPPER ATMOSPHERIC DRAG ON SATELLITES IN LEO" Sean Bruinsma
F.lux is still available and worth it to install on Windows. It has better controls and smoother transitions than Night Light.
The headline leaves out the most important part: "... to Focus on a Cheaper Model".

Surely, the right move.

I can mostly believe VR headsets will catch on, but not at the price of the current Vision Pro.

There's a chicken and egg dynamic here, for developing compelling content/software to take advantage of the capabilities and the number of people with headsets that can consume that content. That's just not going to unravel with the Vision Pro.
Vue? Svelte? Preact? Solid? Even Angular is much saner than React. Nobody needs to use React. Never had to. HTMX is no alternative for highly interactive web apps, btw.
The problem is not the download size. The problem is the amount of code to maintain.
>Then you don't know kids

I'm the oldest of 5 siblings and have helped multiple family members, friends, and neighbors with their kids. I feel comfortable enough to say that I do know kids. In total, I'd say I've helped raise 15-20 kids in my life.

I wasn't allowed a phone or internet access by my parents until I was 18 and off to college, by then the iPhone 5 was out. Even when I did go to college, they refused to get me a phone at all, stating that the front desk of my dorm will walk up 5 flights of stairs to my dorm to tell me I had a call. My aunt had to buy me a flip phone.

You know what I (and my siblings) did when we lived with them? We would buy a schoolmates old iPod touch, PSP, or Blackberry Storm and hide it in our pillow cases. We'd ask for a specific e-ink Kindle because it had a button hidden in the settings to access an "experimental" internet browser.

Kids are creative, and if they want something, they will get it.
> But I'd argue (like modern armies do) the tradeoff is worth it, and the strategic level has more resources to overcome their friction than combat troops engaged in a fight.

I think the tradeoff is practically mandatory for modern armies. The high mobility they require just to avoid artillery strikes and engagements with armor makes top down command impossible to implement in a symmetric conflict.
It is very useful device, but sure- it doesn't block bullets. In a shooting it's mostly useful for contacting family and 911.

>"having access to a cellphone" did not alter the outcome at all in those tragic incidents

How could you possibly conclude that? Look at any timeline of a school shooting and there's often a lot of information going from 911 calls to inform the police on the number of shooters, the shooter's location, and where students are still alive/hiding. ex: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uvalde_school_shooting#Timelin...
Lying is a very difficult burden to prove and requires meeting several criteria:

1. Intent to deceive, so it can't just be that the statement is false but that it was intentionally false as opposed to what is likely a mistake made by a third party. As was noted elsewhere, Sam was positioned to be Chairman of Y Combinator after stepping down as President, but that never happened. It's entirely possible that whoever wrote this did not become aware of that change in circumstances.

2. Reliance and harm. The false statement must be something that was or can be relied upon by potential investors that could cause them harm. It's possible an investor can rely on this fact but it would be very hard to demonstrate harm from it.

3. Materiality. The statement must be significant in that the information could sway a potential investor towards the investment. I'd say misstating credentials is material and so this element does count.

Taken altogether however, this does seem like a whole lot of nothing.
Why would three family members need to know that she's staying out late? I genuinely can't understand your comment because it seems like it has the obvious hallmarks of helicopter parenting. I don't actually know you and you're probably a much more reasonable parent than this comment portrays, and I don't know how old your daughter is, but it seems like you're not comfortable at all with not knowing much she's up to.
If you are arguing that phone use inside the classroom is a distraction then we're already on the same page.

If you're arguing for a total ban even outside the classroom, then I need a little more clarity on how it is a distraction. The cheating ship has scaled; even if you ban the outside the classroom, students still have a "home" where they do "homework" that they can apply whatever cheating mechanisms they want.
> Their browser engine is hard to compete with because it is very good, their web standards are hard to compete with because they are largely appropriate.

Can you elaborate on what you mean when you say "good" and "appropriate"? Good for whom? Appropriate why?
Yikes, you must not have been following the cases or know the laws very well if that’s your takeaway from those.
Also posted here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40710724

My comment:

This camera is very much like my first camera, a Fujica half frame with “guess the distance” focus, some 54 years ago.

In addition: I later got an Olympus Pen-F SLR (also half-frame) with interchangeable lenses, which was quite the camera. Match-needle metering and manual TTL focus that my Mom mastered to get some nice photos!

A standard "135" film frame is 24V by 36H mm. Half-frame makes this 24V by 17H. (twice)

A half-frame slide, scanned should be roughly equivalent to 12 Megapixels. YMMV.
> like the Milk-V Mars which is selling for around $40 currently.

Or was, apparently? Seems to be out of stock and there's no restock or backorder date shown.
Kafka Is Costing You Years of Engineering Time
In today's data-driven world, real-time data streaming is essential for businesses seeking a competitive edge. Apache Kafka has emerged as a powerful tool for building data streaming solutions, enabling organizations to handle vast amounts of data with low latency and high throughput. However, even with managed services, the complexity of Kafka's ecosystem and the challenges of configuring, scaling, and managing Kafka clusters require years of engineering time over the lifetime of an application. This complexity slows development teams down, requiring more time on data-streaming pipelines than on core business applications.

We discuss some of the common pitfalls and challenges when leveraging Kafka for a data-pipeline and how a serverless solution such as created by Ambar can help your business move fast.
In California you pay an extra deposit when you buy a plastic bottle. I don’t know if that number is set to properly capture the externality, but it’s enough to get people wandering the streets to pick up the bottles and turn them in (they even rifle through your trash can). Also, it doesn’t apply to most forms of plastic packaging or goods.
Is it too late to suggest a cluster of JH7110's on a single board? Each SoC has 2 GbE interfaces, so it could even be two networks to make everything speedier.
Even the FCC doesn't appear to understand this correctly. They denied a SpaceX application to put satellites into lower & safer orbits. https://spectrum.ieee.org/starlink-vleo-below-iss
We're talking about phones, not lifesaving medication.
deaths being rare != shootings almost never happen

many people shot are not killed. being a victim of a school shooting does not even mean you were shot.
We're getting a factory seconds one for my son (he loves to tinker, so the fact that it'll need various upgrades is a feature, not a bug). If I were to get one for work, I'd likely start with Ubuntu, but I've really been looking for an excuse to run Nix for my main dev machine.
I wonder if it would trick the compliance department into thinking my computer is safe and leave it alone.
Well, like Soros on the Bank of England or the attack on Terra luna, you can short SEI before the attack as well.

This is actually why "proof of stake" blockchains are fundamentally flawed. They only make sense if the value of the system is denominated in the currency of the system. It's self referential and prone to negative feedback loops. They are secure because the token is expensive, the token is expensive because it provides a secure platform. Short the token, take a loan out, compromise the security, tank the value, profit. All the mechanisms to prevent that are built into the system, like delaying the validator pool entry, but the only real backstop is a hard fork and spinning up a new copy.
Sounds good. Who will pay for that?

The problem is that most of our major freight rail lines were first built when land was very cheap or even free (stolen from indigenous people). Now the land for more rail lines will cost a lot whether it's purchased outright or acquired through eminent domain.

And even building more railroad tracks would only marginally reduce truck transportation. Most truck freight is time sensitive (rail freight can never be fast) or goes places that rail can't really reach.
It’s not financially worthwhile for most third party developers to develop apps for a platform with too few users. Not sure how the iPhone originally did it, that seems pretty amazing to me.

But yeah, need a product to drive up adoption so a healthy ecosystem can form around it… so they can capture 30% of it
Intel has the NPU for inference so it doesn't need CPU cores at all.
MicroCode: Portable programming for the BBC micro:bit
Tibet, the CIA and a forgotten part of Camp Hale's freedom-fighting history
Indeed, I don't understand how Amazon can claim they are fighting this, when they could just ban all resellers