skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> most of their charging will happen at home while the car sits in their garage / driveway

This is a very different story around the world. Something like ~60%~ [it’s actually 35%, I got it backwards] of UK homes have no off-street parking. You'd need streetside chargers or built into lampposts, which is being trialled in some areas but is very small scale and almost certainly would not be as cheap as charging via your home's electricity.

> the 20 minutes it takes for a number of current EVs to get to 80% charge isn't much longer than what you'd spend at a highway service area by the time you get done with fueling the car, going to the bathroom, chasing down everyone who was in the car, maybe buying a drink and snack

The problem with this is that it assumes the car will always need a break at the same I do. That works if I can charge easily at home and will only need to fast charge on long journeys, but as I said above it's just not practical for many people. It's also best case scenario insofar as it assumes both that your car can charge quickly, and that you have close-by access to a fully functioning fast charger.

It's not a huge hurdle (and I do believe that by say 2034 this stuff won't be a concern at all), but the additional planning required is more than a lot of people are willing to consider, and I don't think they're wrong in thinking that. Especially because even now electric cars are still very much out of price range for lots of people (again, going by UK prices and salaries).
Sure makes the case for Gemini Pro, doesn't it.
"This package can be used to count tokens for Anthropic's older models. As of the Claude 3 models, this algorithm is no longer accurate [...]"

I've been bugging Anthropic about this for a while, they said that releasing a new tokenizer is not on their current roadmap.
I remember reading somewhere that all large companies in China are effectively state-owned, they basically always have a CCP member of the party on their board, which even the CEO is beholden to.
Will you convince all your friends and family to start running GrapheneOS?
I mean, it seems like all benefits can be summarized with "solves overconsumption problems".
What you move to when you quit Fandom. Super common for games.

Examples:

Fandom: https://noita.fandom.com/wiki/Noita_Wiki

Official: https://noita.wiki.gg/wiki/Noita_Wiki

Fandom: https://terraria.fandom.com/wiki/Terraria_Wiki

Official: https://terraria.wiki.gg/wiki/Terraria

Fandom: https://minecraft.fandom.com/wiki/Minecraft_Wiki

Official: https://minecraft.wiki/

Two of the three Fandom wiki's above are still ranked higher than the official ones on Google.
Many companies don't advertise openings and only go through recruiters, so unless you know someone working there, that's an entire segment of employment that you can't access without using a recruiter.

Make sure you have a good LinkedIn profile and it highlights the kind of work you want to do. Recruiters do search through those to find matches for positions that they want to fill.
I work for wiki.gg

You can use one (or both) of these extensions to avoid Fandom:

* https://getindie.wiki/, should redirect you to any not-fandom equivalent

* https://support.wiki.gg/wiki/Wiki.gg_Redirect, is wiki.gg wikis only and will see updates for such wikis more frequently
dune supports Reason syntax out of the box, you just have to change the file extension to .re.

https://dune.readthedocs.io/en/stable/reference/dune-project...
Your semantic argument isn't useful to this discussion.
Spain still has not succededed after triying for centuries. Italy has "dialects" [1]. I'm not sure about the local detaild of the other countries.

[1] A dialect is a language without a flag or a float.
I think there is another factor that some people would pay every penny they have to not go to prison for a meaningful length of time.
You may have to start building your own reverse index if you're polling API's at query time
> Animal language is obviously on the same level as human laughter and cries and whimpers. Animals don't teach language to each other like humans do.

Obviously? There’s no reason to assume that. It is known that cetaceans acquire their language and dialects through social learning. It was very recently discovered that some whales even have names for each other. Their language may be different from ours, but it is not just emotions.

And then of course there are primates, elephants etc…
Some of those thought experiments were interesting, but I still landed on "That's still a conscious system" for all of them. I expected you to go much further with the permutations.
I shrink 10x every 21s until I'm an atom – The Micro Universe [video]
Well if you read the template, you'll see I start out with a non-technical explanation, advise that they forward the email to an IT type person, and offer to help in any way I can. Then I put in a "More info" heading further down with all the details and instructions.

Overall I'm pleased with how well this approach works. When people realize that their email is getting stuck in spam filters because of a problem on their end, they're usually motivated to get it fixed. Sometimes it gets sent to an owner who had barely enough tech mojo to stand up a gmail account at a custom domain, and even then the instructions are usually simple enough for them to follow.
Stacking Up Intel Gaudi Against Nvidia GPUs for AI
For a while, science didn't admit to a female orgasm, either. There was "no evidence" in the sense that no one had bothered to perform scientific observation and collect data. There was common sense, and reasonable assumption, but no studies. Then there were studies.

Common sense tells you and I that animals are conscious to some degree. But as there is no current scientific definition of what the system of consciousness actually is (and I'm speculatively calling it a system) it's difficult to say animals have it through observation. We know they respond to anesthetics just like we do. We know anesthesia can shut off consciousness, so there's some physicality to whatever consciousness is. We just don't have a classification for it yet.
There are many answers.

"Because we can" is the obvious private one.
"Because we need to pay for R&D" is the one that is likely trotted out. If I'm a US lawmaker who cares about their constituents, I'd probably like to know how to have the USA benefit from someone else paying for the R&D.
> The VDOM diffing made complex, fast moving UIs way easier to run performantly.

That was marketing more than reality.

VDOM diffing isn’t the slowest way to update complex UIs but it isn’t the fastest either. In practice your app often ends up generating a lot of VDOM which then gets diffed away… a bunch of work and then a bunch more work to determine the first bunch can be thrown away. The app developer needs to step in to manage and optimize the process.
At least in california people are given notice before a cleanup and given plenty of opportunity to get important things together. They are offered shelter space or supportive housing before the encampment is cleaned out too. If there are items that seem to be important personal property after the notice period, some cities actually will hold these items off site for a time for eventual collection by the property owner.
Can you elaborate? When you say "start trading," what criteria would you use to pick stocks that beat the index?
FPGA-Based Disk Controller for Apple II (2017)
Raise your hand if you read the topic wrong the first time.
The (Old School) Runescape wiki mentioned in the article (https://runescape.wiki/ and https://oldschool.runescape.wiki/) is higher up than the Fandom one on all search engines I'm aware of. The Minecraft wiki (https://minecraft.wiki/) also generally beats out the Fandom one (on Bing, Yandex, ... - but critically not yet Google).

Definitely takes a lot of effort, but can be done.
At least far as it comes to privacy Apple and even FB, MS and Google to an extent share the same interests as their users, unlike the EU bureaucrats who just seem to be salty because they are unable to exert control over society and justify their existence (they might pass some decent policies while they are it that's just mostly a coincident..).

If Chat Control goes ahead long-term that will outweigh any benefits DMA might have.
You could say that about anything that is critical.
Yeah, I think stealing that kind of money pretty much guarantees that you'll need to be paranoid for the rest of your life. I wouldn't take that for any amount.
DMA, like any other regulation that preceded it, was severely lobbied down. It happened in spite of EU. There is too great of a democratic consensus for it to be completely ignored. Do not get this wrong.
That is really awesome. It can be easy to miss setting up SPF on every new tool.
Recycling Solar Panels the Clean, Green Way
Your distorted view of Altman is probably causing you to go down the wrong path of securities law.

1) I don't believe even if malicious this would be a criminal case that leads to jail time.

2) The s-1 filings are prepared and audited by third party companies.

3) Most likely in this case, these positions are listed to outline any potential conflicts of interest. I am not well read on the matter but I could see that you would list potential engagements to note the conflict of interest even if they are not finalized.
Shoutout to the devs from pmndrs reminding the react core team that not all async is fetching crud data
Sucks to be you if you live in an apartment and cannot charge at home.
For me this is another example of why, all things said and done, we need free software for image processing and for final-form document processing - not Photoshop and Acrobat.

For Acrobat, at least, a combination of tool sorta-kinda-mostly gets the job done; look at Xournal++, qpdf, and the various PDF printers (gradually being superseded by library-based PDF export filters).

For image processing, we have simple programs like Paint.Net or Krita, and we have GIMP - which is quite featureful but I don't know if it's a "match" for Photoshop.
They were at least 2000 years behind Europe in weapons and armor technology. Some cultures had bronze weapons, but no iron smelting or steel.

Even before muskets started becoming common, European professional infantry had largely abandoned shields. Mass produced plate armor provided sufficient protection from arrows, and two-handed pikes were better than a pike and a shield.

On the other hand, bows became more effective again as muskets improved. When a musket could penetrate any reasonable armor, personal protection became less important.
DON LAFONTAINE: In a world...
Where the Internet was betrayed...
One man...
Is called to serve again.
And he's dispensing his own brand of standard.
>Well if you read the template

I read the template, that's how I spotted the acronyms that weren't spelled out. Like DNS on the second line, before you recommend forwarding.

>Overall I'm pleased with how well this approach works.

Interesting, I definitely would have thought it'd be ignored more often than not, but I might have to look into rolling out something similar. Thanks for the idea.
SDXL had bad details but I could absolutely do people in poses other than standing up.

While those grass laying images are iconic, Lykon (one of their employees) said on Discord “I don’t know what people could possibly be promoting to get human blobs.” I sent him the first image I did of “photo of a woman getting a massage on a massage table” or something like that and it’s even worse. I went back and checked and while SDXL isn’t great at it it’s not a complete body horror unlike SD3.

People have noticed that SD3 is way better at posing Barbies than people, so it’s pretty clear they screwed it up in the name of safety.
Worth being careful about how we are using the term bias, which means different things in legal contexts than it does in the ML context.

Anything that has a legal requirement to remain unbiased will also clearly define what counts as bias, e.g. discriminating based on race in hiring like you mention. So there's not just some requirement that a process be "unbiased" in a vague, general, philosophical sense as debated above in this thread. Rather, the definition of bias is tied to specific actions relative to specific categories of people, which can thus potentially be measured and corrected.

More generally in ML, bias means that the training set deviates from the ground truth systematically in some way. Entirely eliminating bias that falls into that broader definition seems like an impossibility for general-purpose LLMs, which cover so much territory where the ground-truth is unknown, debatable, or subject to change over time. For example, if you were to ask an LLM whether governmental debt above a certain percentage of GDP damages growth prospects sufficiently to make the debt not worth taking on, you would not receive an answer that corresponds to a ground truth because there is no consensus in academic economics about what the ground truth is. Or rather you wouldn't be able to know that it corresponds to the ground truth, and it would only be a coincidence if it did.

That ML definition of bias runs against the legal definition where the ground-truth is itself biased. e.g., if you were to develop an algorithm to predict whether a given student will succeed in a collegiate environment, it would almost certainly display racial bias because educational outcomes are themselves racially biased. Thus, an unbiased algorithm in the ML-meaning of the word would actually be extremely biased in the legal sense of the word.
Until recently, I was using the Adobe suite extensively. I decided to switch to a competing software exactly because of the practices mentioned in the article.

I don't want to elaborate unnecessarily, but I can confirm that these accusations are absolutely valid, and I even recently told my friends about how unfair Adobe's practices towards consumers are.

I also personally know someone who decided to block their payment card at the bank because it was the only way they knew to free themselves from Adobe's subscription.
By default the hotkey for tabbing through app instances is Cmd + ~

I bound it to Option + tab though, more intuitive to me.
"Both fish and guests start to get on the nose after 3 days." - Judge Judy
Crypto bug bounties require specialized low level knowledge. Web 2 pentesting is akin to a qa checklist. Imo op is right that web2 bounties are commoditized.
I've been looking for some data on estimated drift from this, but no specifics. That said, since it's looking at wave properties of cooled atoms, I'm assuming we're talking "wavelength" accuracy as opposed to more conventional inertial nav systems.

My point perhaps is that though this is "nothing new", it's (probably) way more accurate than anything before it. So the "pain points" of recalibration and drift are extremely minimized.
> The only place I've ever heard someone say "I bought my apartment" is New York, but even that is just vernacular, because the governing body is some sort of association or condo board.

It's not "just vernacular", it is perfectly proper formal English. For many non-Americans – and even it seems many Americans too – calling something an "apartment" says nothing about the legal structure of building ownership.

I can find heaps of American news stories about people in the US buying apartments. Random example, this 2007 story from Fox News about the disappearance of a college student in Madison, Wisconsin [0]. It says regarding the victim that "Nolan, originally from Waunakee, had recently bought an apartment and moved to Madison from Whitewater, where she went to school". If Fox News is talking about people buying apartments in Madison, Wisconsin, then it is perfectly normal American English. Much more convincing than random Americans on HN telling me it isn't.

[0] https://www.foxnews.com/story/cops-look-at-bars-surveillance...
Free speech absolutists like myself got run over culturally with hate speech laws so for anyone continuing on the fight I wish you the best of luck.
I'm not sure why, but this makes me think of the time before ubiquitous internet, when the answers to questions like this one were much harder to come by.
The project changed to a 1 million dollar bounty after usmannk's report on May 18th..

There's an unofficial project that tracks bounty programs, you can see the change here: https://github.com/infosec-us-team/Immunefi-Bug-Bounty-Progr...
Great tips thanks.
Yes, it was very much intended consequences, based on their perception of usage and what usage should be like, which was biased. They admitted it and plan on reverting though.
> Having a couple Fandom pages open in tabs can drive my laptop fan crazy and turn my phone into a griddle.

It's all the FanCoin it's mining in situ
There's also F# if you're looking for an OCaml with better syntax.
That's quite regional. I have my choice of over 20 ISP's offering virtually identical services. That's why pricing is so competitive in NZ.
This is exactly right -- Adobe wanted people to pirate Photoshop at home because they knew it wasn't realistic for a lot of home users to pay for an entire Photoshop license upfront. Back in 2010, that was a whopping $700 [1].

SaaS changed that -- you can now get Photoshop for a month (no annual contract) for $10 [2, 3].

Which is truly just an amazing deal -- that $700 in 2010 would be $1015 today, so the subscription will be cheaper until you use it for eight and a half years, plus you get upgrades. It's a lot fairer for everyone. Except when Adobe pulls sh*t like the FTC is suing them over.

But yes -- SaaS absolutely ended the idea of companies wanting home users to pirate their stuff so companies would buy it.

[1] https://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/04/12/photoshop.first.look.wir...

[2] https://petapixel.com/how-much-is-photoshop/

[3] https://www.adobe.com/creativecloud/photography.html
Are they even enforcing DMA? My WhatsApp still doesn’t have Third Party Chats.
Your post convinced me of the opposite of what you were going for; after reading it, I get even more of a feeling that DJI does shady things.
This is pretty cool, but I have questions.

1) In their 4MW plan, using 4 reactors in a tennis court area, what level of kinetic attack can this withstand? Can a fuel tanker truck run into it? Quadcopter with an RPG round? The reason that I ask this is because they talked about deploying to war zones.

2) What is the refueling cycle? 1 year? How fissile is the waste compared to LWR? Is the waste stored onsite for a long time, like in LWR?
Miraheze is the main replacement to Fandom -- it's an ad-free, community-owned, nonprofit supported entirely by donations, grants and volunteers. We've been operating free wikis on MediaWiki for about 9 years now, supported through different organizations, but right now we're the fastest and most stable we've ever been. Like all OSS efforts, we can always use more technical volunteers. I'm Chair and Acting President of the WikiTide Foundation, the parent of Miraheze, and I'd be happy to answer any questions about the service. Our users are generally more anti-Fandom than this article is, in my experience.

For paid offerings, with a little more freedom than a wiki farm host can allow, WikiTeq, MyWikis, and WikiWorks are all good offerings in the MediaWiki space. I currently work for WikiTeq, but they're all pretty good, and the owners are on friendly terms with each other, with a lot of them coming in through the Wikimedia community or staff.
The parliament can block legislation indefinitely.
That's why you need to always ensure authority rests with individuals, or the ability to secure against unjust authority.

The second your only recourse against authority is to politely ask it not to do something bad to you (maybe, for instance, on a piece of paper with multiple choice questions), you have no real autonomy.
Signal isn't big enough to play that game.

They'll just be blocked from the app store for EU users and their user base in the EU will drop to near zero within a year.
It's always been amazing to me that in the post-internet, pre-enshittification era of the Information age that people could go around confidently spouting bullshit facts like "gum stays in your body for 7 years" when a few swipes of a thumb can tell anyone with an internet connection otherwise.

Nowadays this doesn't hold as true, because search results / LLM's tend to give you the information it thinks that you want rather than what is actually the result. Have seen a lot of people getting into dumb, easily disprovable arguments and using a copy pasted google summary as evidence to whatever absurd claim they are making.
"The main issue I have to overcome is latency getting too high when retrieving form different places at once." The solution for that is maintaining and updating an index. (Although that drives up costs.)

Google has done a terrible job, but perplexity has done a pretty good job. I think there's quite a bit to be gained by summing/extracting desired information from threads. I'm thinking opinions on choosing tech stacks (eg, "should i use sql or nosql", "fastAPI vs supabase"...), or even fixing bugs (on that note, if you're going after tech, github might be another to look at).

I defitley agree there's a ton of noise in discussions, I think LLM's are the current best way to cut through that noise.
^ Exactly my feelings about React. The sad truth is that React is still viable for startups as the ecosystem has the most extensive librarie.
I’m an American. I wish we had these protections.
I read "a gun" and was wondering if it's really that many people that would warrant writing an article about it.
I think you're wrong, without knowing it. And in a way this kind of subjective judgment call "people must be using react like me I guess" is the entire cause of this misshap.

Don't assume usage patterns. Measure them, or you know nothing.
Dusty Decks? First thing that popped into my head when I saw your name. I bookmarked it on one of my web pages back in 2004. Dang, between that and your other works, a computing rock star in our midst!

Dusty Decks: Preserving historic software
https://mcjones.org/dustydecks/
um why don't they answer the real question: what happens if you swallow bubble gum?! 12-year old me needs to know.
That's pretty uncharitable. You pivoted the conversation by introducing a new hypothetical for me to respond to. Of course my response is different. There's no conflict between the two comments.

If we're going to be play that game, notice how you didn't actually respond to my comment or explain why you thought LLMs were moral entitles or why ML and teaching were comparable? I actually engaged substantively with your hypothetical; are you able to do the same?
Anyone else find it a bit "conflict of interest"-y that Wikipedia often limits creation of niche articles because they have to be 'notable' enough, meanwhile its creator is heavily involved in running for-profit Fandom that just so happens to solve that problem?
> Only Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Austria and Poland are relatively clear that they will not support the proposal, but this is not sufficient for a “blocking minority”.

Ahem what? Last I checked any EU country can veto anything on its own.

> Belgian EU Council presidency

It's Council of the EU, not EU Council, that's the heads of state who don't have any legislative role. But the Council only does inter-country treaties, how is this even their thing?