skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Diesel electrics can be big enough and with long enough expected lifetimes to go 'all out', I think in some ways they can get closer to CCGT as far as efficiency.

Where the challenge comes for smaller vehicles, is the more power you are trying to give, the more you have to build everything up; not just the engine but whatever that engine is inputting into, also trains have somewhat more predictable speed profiles over a trip vs a car.

This is why some manufacturers have vehicles that are PHEVS but really BEVs with an 'oh crap' extender that can struggle to keep up a good grade.

I gotta give TRD/Toyota/Ford credit, the HSD style drive train does work around a lot of this stuff for PHEVS; in lockup mode you have a 1:1 ratio with minimal losses and at that point it's up to the ability of the engine to adjust profile.

Works very well in practice, and far simpler than the setups of others.
Also barefoot gen.
Hack the Hacker – How to Setup an SSH Honeypot
As I mentioned earlier, following my post here (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40694768), I received numerous messages inquiring about the process. To address your questions, I've written a comprehensive blog post that explains everything in detail from start to finish.
Thank you for your interest! If there’s anything you feel needs further clarification or detail, please let me know.
I've been using Exposure for many years, but it seems like it might be dying/dead - they haven't released an update in a long time, YT and social media accounts are quiet etc.

If you're using a Mac, the new Nitro from gentlemancoders seems quite good. I haven't made the leap yet though because it's missing file/library management and layers.
You can. The main thing is that software-based attacks are easier to perform.
> Items can be referenced using their in-game names because there's no risk of conflict

Did you purposefully pick one of the items that has an in-game naming conflict and a disambiguation line?

Being focused to a single game means there's only a few conflicts, but it's not zero.
It seems like the problem with modern capitalism is too much money and too few real jobs.
I'm skeptical of that. Most western Europe countries have similarly low birth rates to Japan despite having some of the lowest working hours in the world.
How important is expunging the records?

According to tge article, background check databases will be cleared. That seems like enough for most people.

Expunging the records probably relies on a lot of effort to identify which court records are relevant.
> A bit of a stretch

Is that true?

C.f. what we're discussing

He's actively encouraging using LLMs to solve his benchmark, called ARC AGI.

8 hours ago, from Chollet, re: TFA

"The best solution to fight combinatorial explosion is to leverage intuition over the structure of program space, provided by a deep learning model. For instance, you can use a LLM to sample a program..."

Source: https://x.com/fchollet/status/1802801425514410275
Probably this one [1]:

> Xylitol is prothrombotic and associated with cardiovascular risk

In simpler terms [2]:

> Cleveland Clinic-Led Study Links Sugar Substitute to Increased Risk of Heart Attack and Stroke

[1] https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/advance-article-abstract/...

[2] https://newsroom.clevelandclinic.org/2024/06/06/cleveland-cl...
Here un Chile, pacients at hospitals are called users by nurses and others alike. It's really weird
It's a simple concept.

You pay for services. Some services are free and funded by ads.

Be thankful for the free shit instead of being salty about having to "pay" with ads.
It's a very convincing rebuttal considering that GPT-3 and GPT-4 came out after ARC but made no significant progress on it. He seemingly had the single most accurate and verifiable prediction of anyone in the world (in 2019) about exactly what type of tasks scaled LLMs would be bad at.
Bias is inherit in the choice of training material. I'm saying that diversity of expression is product of diversity of experience.
AI for sure will help to provide suggestion based on the question we ask or doubts based on that should help business to take discussion
Those are private properties or privileged activities. Eating poison, in your private home being regulated means your home is not truly yours and you have no liberty.
Well said, but I stand by the sentiment knowing that I'm communicating one of my moral values. I think it's a natural one, even if it's not unanimous! Kant says that our lives -- and by necessity those of all rational creatures -- are built on three lies (paralogisms): spacetime is bounded and continuous, I am a unified persistent person, and I am freely-motivated actor. These aren't empirical moral arguments, based in testing the best ways to organize society, but rather based in the very nature of what it means to play the role of "human being". Seriously and intentionally eroding one of those pillars is, I would say, an evil occurrence in-and-of itself.

Sure, the risks might be minimal and countless people will try, I have no doubt. Presumably you could use something like this to massively enhance your computational abilities/speed, given the right tech. But you run an unknowable risk of total and complete personal ruin, like a frog in boiling water that doesn't even know if it's died yet or not. Worth the risk? Maybe. But you're selling your soul to entropy, at the very least!
Plus it's unclear if the amount of data used to "train" a human brain is really less than what GPT4 used. Imagine all the inputs from all the senses of a human over a lifetime: the sound, light, touches, interactions with peers, etc.
How to see the 2024 nova explosion without a telescope
> The Terraformer modules have three relevant sub-components:

> 1. Hydrogen electrolyser: Splits water into its component hydrogen and oxygen

Stop there. Store the hydrogen and oxygen and burn it for power rather than the natural gas.
Sadly IRC is fast becoming a ghost town.

When projects flocked from Freenode to Libera a lot of people dropped IRC all together. Which is a shame, modern IRC clients are pretty good.
The truth is that Adobe said they could get Flash running on the first gen iPhone with 128MB of RAM and a 400Mhz processor.

Safari barely ran on the first gen iPhone. If you scrolled too fast, it would display a checkerbox while the rendering caught up. It didn’t even have enough memory to have a background image on your Home Screen.

When Flash finally came to mobile in 2010 on Android, it required 1Gb RAM and 1Ghz processor and it barely ran. I had an HTC that met those specs. The first iPhone that met those specs didn’t come out until 2011.

Adobe was always over promising and under delivering on Flash for mobile to the point where the Motorola tablet that advertised flash support didn’t ship with it and embarrassingly enough, you couldn’t even view the Xoom’s home page on the web with the tablet because it required Flash.
You know i get it ... ML is primarily python... but why can't we get code models tuned for languages used by non-ML developers more targeted, .NET, PHP, Rust, C, as first class training datasets.

Shit with rusts great feedback from the compiler theres really no reason we can't have a full loop LLM trained on the code and the responses to properly handle the full dev cycle.
You're deliberately misinterpreting what I said and ignoring half of my argument and it's plainly obvious. The newspaper is not the only proof. It's just to show that Ukrainian collaboration with the Nazis was very widespread and understood. Hell, even the Canadian parliament accidentally honored a Nazi Ukrainian War veteran and the speaker had to resign over it.

To complete the analogy, if an American military unit used the same symbols the Nazis used while collaborating with the Nazis during WWII and then a modern-day American military unit proudly used those same symbols while constantly being told by all their allies, NATO, various allies journalists, etc. that these symbols cannot be shown to the public, they should absolutely be disbanded and never allowed to use such symbols again.

Why doesn't that happen in Ukraine? It's such a an obvious thing to do, you never ever answer this question, just always pick on minor things and make up strange interpretations of minor parts of what I'm saying
I think a great way to get better at this is to ask more questions than provide answers. If you really hone in on what people are discussing, if you figure out what they want, what they’re afraid of, what they’re unsure of, etc. your suggestion will mean a lot more than if you’re perceived as “barging in and ordering people around”. I’ve practiced the Socratic method a lot with a lot of people, and it can really help to give your arguments some extra punch. Remember than people usually don’t want to be told “we need to do X” - they want to believe that they had a part in discovering and advocating for that, even if the whole thing was your idea all along.
Amongst other things, looking out for vandalism and misinformation. Also managing categories, infoboxes etc as they get updated. There's quite a lot. Just look at the history of any article.
> China doesn't bring evidence to a judge in order to get a subpoena for data. They just go to DJI a get it. DJI has zero legal recourse if the CCP wants access to all DJI's stored data. Doesn't matter where that data is stored.

Is this an assumption or do you have first-hand knowledge of how this works operationally, in practice?
This is what actually happened

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40713706
Anybody know if there’s something like HTMX that plugs into Turbo? Every time I start using a stimulus controller, I have the thought that it should be more like HTMX instead.
I think animals do have consciousness, and I had thought that many times in the past. However, it is also necessary to define "consciousness". (Even this article admits that, though.)

About placing humanity (or something else) in a category of its own, that depends on how the categorization is made, and it could be done in any way, so such a categorization of humanity does not really help, and can be deceptive to think it is the only one or the best one.

I also think that "intelligence" would not be simply defined by higher vs lower; it is more complicated because of different kind of intelligence and more subclassifications of those too, and then there is the difference of e.g. speed vs knowledge vs etc. There is a sense to identify the intelligence of kind of animals (and of the same kind of animals, e.g. human), but if you merely say it is higher or lower then it is imprecise.

This article also mentions colours, such as red colours. (And other things that you can also feel.) But, not all kind of animal can see all of the colours; some can see some colours that humans does not see but also does not see some that humans does see. Humans can see three colours, but some animals might see four colours. (And, some people also are partially or fully colour blind.)

I had also read in a book once, they said, they are sure that insects have feelings but is not sure about emotions. Well, my guess is probably they do; but, it would be a mistake to think that having emotion would necessarily mean that it is like humans emotions; it can be difference.

Nevertheless, many things that people have said are only for humans and are not what other kind of animals are. In many cases, I think they are wrong (and may even apply for some kind of plants, etc); "conscious" is not the only thing. However, there are also differences (including differences in the details of the things that actually are similar in many ways); and probably some of the differences have been missed as much as many of the similarities have been missed. (There are also differences between individuals, but that is a different thing.)

> And this is important because we need to set rules to protect them either in the lab or in the wild.

You do not need to know exactly how those animals will feel to justify avoiding treating animals badly.

Differences of different kind of animals does not justify to treat them badly.

But, it is good that scientists are actually finally figuring out this stuff scientifically, now. Although I and others had said such things before, that is not the same as doing it scientifically; so now that it can be done scientifically, it will be understood better scientifically, too.
>you can build your own drone quite cheaply using open source technologies

Problem is that literally ever single part that goes into building a DIY drone is sourced from China. You can 3d print the frame. But that's about it. Most drone hobbyist buy them from sellers in the U.S that import them in bulk from China or they order directly from sites like AliExpress.
> Fostering mental fiscal compartmentalization and cognitive dissonance is your best bet in screwing over the American consumer for that $$$.

Yeah, pretty much. Especially when customer service is one of the most painful, drawling experinces imaginable for someone already working 60 hours a week and taking care of family. Or spending an hour+ on the line with excuciating elevator music hoping you don't disconnect and need to repeat that process. It's financially and mentally not worth the hassle unless it's over a certain delta. Maybe that's where some of this cultural difference lies.

But I think it's more an age thing than a country thing though. Look at who's in a phone store or grocery or any other establishment with a streamlined complaint pipeline on your next off day.
>> Power is power, there is no combined "power + torque" that measures how much wind you have in the sails. Torque just characterises how much power you can get along different RPMs.

> Torque (at the wheel) does matter as well as power.

If you are getting 250 W of power at the wheel (in other units, 250 Joules per second, or 250 Newton-meters), that's what you are getting, no torque about it.

>> the EU/UK 250 W cap is so low that it seems unlikely torque characteristics would enter the picture significantly unless you're going very slowly

> Though perhaps you're saying these motors are so over-rated that even close to stall torque, their reduced power output is still 250W?

Yes, I was saying something close to that ("very slowly").

IOW the overprovisioning of the motor combined with the power cap makes the motor work much more like a "always 250 W" power source than a "250 W peak output modified by torque" power source.
The fun thing is that for those of us who cannot it’s as hard to believe others can conjure images. Yes the idea of mental imagery is deeply ingrained in our language but I’d always assumed it was allusion till I learned of aphantasia when I was 30.

One of the more cliche, and not super useful tests, is “imagine a ball on a table, someone pushes the ball and it begins to roll. What color is the ball?” For me that was a revelatory statement because I’d never consider that others might give the ball a color, or size, or texture as the imagine it. I assume not everyone with the ability to visualize does but it seems like many do according to the literature. To me it’s just a statement, a ball is rolling pushed by a nondescript person.
That's a good point. I make hiphop so MPC jives with me and my vinyl-based sampling workflow perfectly.

A lot of critiques of MPC I see come from people doing live stuff or non-electronic based music. You can only make so many people happy with each piece of software/hardware.

DAWs try to do it all, and market themselves that way, but a lot of people seem to end up using one for production, one for mixing, etc.

But also there's a TON of unserious people in music who don't really learn their craft and just jump between tools looking for a solution to their disinterest in really making music, and then they leave these critical reviews of tools they didn't bother learning, before moving on to the next DAW/synth/etc
Yes, someone has tried https://iprc-dip.github.io/DARC/
Are we still talking about China here?
https://web.archive.org/web/20210826223800/http://www.bbc.co...
This is theory. In practice, you should have done some work during your course and it's reasonable to assume that using version control (which you can learn in a day) is a skill you'd pick up at that time. If not, what exactly were you doing for all those years is a question.
As much as I've never heard of, don't care about, and had no particular trust in the "Pac-Man Museum+" videogame, I am nonetheless disappointed in them for altering their history without credit or footnote. I expect more from Museum-branded shovelware.
I do this for a living, Ask Me Anything.

Before they were called tools they were called function calls in ChatGpt.

Before that we had response_format = "json_object"

And even before that we were prompting with function signatures and asking it to output parameters.
> Hassabis says that he’s learning more about introducing products and that Google’s product teams, in turn, are dealing with the novel challenges of generative AI, which has the potential to behave unusually when placed in the hands of the general public.

This part isn't rocket science.

Step 1) Post on 4chan and SomethingAwful "What is the worst thing you could do with genAI? Go."

Step 2) Test your beta product against all the answers you get.
Is it really "a minimalist bash program" if half the script is a forest of complicated perl regexes?
Agents probably won't refer to all members of Homo as humans, I would imagine.
I 100% do not think in words or sentences or language. It feels more like node-traversing a graph of concepts, but it's all completely abstract. While I am able to consciously play back my thoughts linguistically or visually with some effort (and at the cost of efficiency), by default there are neither words nor images.

French is my first language, I'm fluent in English, and I know a bit about many languages... But I've never had an inner voice or thought in language, even when I was very young.
Everything in finance... banks have the same bug bounty.
From entering a hot labor market with rising wages and investing?

The alternative is entering a cool labor market with stagnant or decreasing wages.

Obviously, people who already had assets made out better, but that is not a possibility for 99% of high school/college graduates, so useless to consider.
The considerations I'm talking about are independent of location. Nor does what happened to weapons waste have any bearing on this issue.
Anthony Fauci: The First Three Months of the Pandemic
Any idea why the people with decades of industrial engineering behind them who are building out massive solar farms and looking to power massive chunks of industry aren't stopping at hydrogen but continuing on to ammonia?

Any thoughts on why methane might practically be a better gas than hydrogen for pragmatic use?

Can you expand on why your hot take is better than what others in industry have proposed?
Show HN: Assistants Hub – A Portal for Building AI Assistants
Hello HN Folks,

I started working on Assistants Hub to solve a personal need, creating math assistants for my 3rd and 7th graders. I wanted to see what they were asking the AI at the same time, also make it super easy to get to it (with a link I can bookmark on their Chromebooks) without signing up or remembering things. They liked it, and used it to learn concepts well

I expanded on the idea and felt like GPTs and AI assistants are underutilized in many fields due to the technical barriers involved in creating and distributing them. Assistants Hub is an effort to democratize this process, enabling even non-tech savvy users to build and deploy AI assistants tailored to diverse needs and domains.

Best of all it is Open Source - https://github.com/assistants-hub/assistantshub.ai
Docs - https://docs.assistantshub.ai
Web - https://assistantshub.ai

Here are some sample personal assistants you can try with a link

Personal Motivator - https://www.assistantshub.ai/link/asst_VPDlaUfoPGxLNkO08wYGS...

7th Grade Math Tutor - https://www.assistantshub.ai/link/asst_g01HY9X2X4XQHNK7P51VX...

Story Sprout - Kids Story Teller - https://www.assistantshub.ai/link/asst_g01HYQ3GSC7ZFYACMEYRR...

British Slang Converter - https://www.assistantshub.ai/link/asst_P491HeO2xjNweCbZKy2So...

2nd Grade Math Tutor - https://www.assistantshub.ai/link/asst_0PrZyGIz3LUkFi54Os56Q...

Einstein Assistant - Tells you all about Dr.Einstein - https://www.assistantshub.ai/link/asst_t72CbOBs7RViy12ge9pFt...

Primary goal is to add transparency and controls to the buyer (person paying for the AI) at the same time, make it super easy for the consumer of the AI (students, customers, employees etc.,). Right now this has analytics, conversation history, visual customizations, integration options. Document support (RAG) is available with OpenAI assistants,

Planning to introduce support for functions and more eventually. At some point I hope to build a wysiwyg editor to drag and drop functions, capabilities to customize AI Assistants

Right now this support 4 major providers - OpenAI, Groq, Anthropic, and Google Gemini. Users can Bring Your Own API Keys (BYOK) from these platforms or use Assistants Hub's default key.

Technical Stack:

• Frontend: Next.js with Tailwind CSS and Flowbite for a clean, responsive design.
• Backend: Prisma ORM on top of PostgreSQL ensures robust data handling.
• Storage: AWS S3 for reliable blob storage.

Do you like the idea / or skeptical of it? What could be improved or changed? I’m looking for honest, constructive feedback that can help refine and enhance the platform.

Are there specific tasks or industries you think could benefit by Assistants Hub? I’m keen to explore new domains where this can make a significant impact.

LOOKING for Contributors to this project, both technical and non-technical, feel free to reach out to me santthosh -at- gmail -dot- com
Only $9 a month in perpetuity until you kick the can, and you too can have your records expunged with a single click.
Do you use something like cargo-watch for "hot reload"?
According to my favorite scene in the movie: Oppenheimer didn’t drop the bomb, Truman did. Now get that cry baby out of here.
They would probably last a lot longer time if designed for more boring engine speeds, but not cost much less.
I think you are imagining a scenario where you are using the LLM manually. Tools are designed to serve as a backend for other GPT like products.

You don't have the capacity to "audit" stuff.

Furthermore tool execution occurs not in the LLM but in the code that calls the LLM through API. So whatever code executes the tool, it also orders the calling sequence graph. You don't need to audit it, you are calling it.
Yes. Life has nuance. She was betting all humans would be decent people, and they clearly are not. Darwin awards exist for a reason: You can blame a victim if they're ignoring all common sense. What if she:

Goes for a hike at the Grand canyon, with no water, becomes dehydrated, and dies.

Smokes and drinks her entire life, suffers a massive heart attack, and dies.

Rides a bike to work with no helmet, is hit by a truck, and suffers permanent brain damage.

Invests her live savings in NFTs and has to declare bankruptcy.

Victim blaming is OK with me in all of these scenarios.
It’s a marketing tactic way broader than the “new economy”

You know coupons in the newspaper? They serve exactly the same purpose.
Some people take time and effort to cut them out every week. Others don’t and pay full price.

It’s a way to make customers who are willing to pay more pay more

Edit: referring to the “always on sale”, not to the cancellation promotions