skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This argument of freedom seems applicable on both sides. A site owner/admin is free to return whatever response they wish based on the assumed origin of a request. An LLM user/service is free to send whatever info in the request that elicits a useful response.
I don't have anything for you, but if you have some normally allocated hierarchal data structures in order to free them you'll have to go through their members, chase pointers, etc., to figure out the addresses to free, then call free on them in sequence. That's all going to be a lot more expensive than just memsetting a bunch of data to zero, which you can do at whatever the speed of your cores memory bandwidth is.
JetBlue A320 at Bridgetown on Jun 4th 2024, what is going on with the airplane?
Or they could just be… in a regular old database of the issuer, who is the one that will validate them anyway when you redeem them for articles?
This article [1] is several years old, but I believe it is still an accurate summary:

> Sam Abuelsamid, an industry analyst at Navigant and former automotive engineer, tells Ars that it's "pretty much universal" that "vehicles are programmed to ignore stationary objects at higher speeds."

Chevrolet says [2]

> At speeds between 5 and 50 mph, Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) can help you avoid or reduce the severity of a collision† with a detected vehicle you’re following using camera technology. It can automatically provide hard emergency braking or enhance the driver’s hard braking.

They don't specifically say it won't detect stationary objects on this page, but a vehicle you're following will have been in motion, or you're not following it.

Consumer reports describes several types of AEB [3], none of which mention stationary objects.

If you've got a reference that suggests that driver assistance features stop for stationary objects outside of parking speeds, please provide a link.

[1] https://arstechnica.com/cars/2018/06/why-emergency-braking-s...

[2] https://www.chevrolet.com/support/vehicle/driving-safety/bra...

[3] https://www.consumerreports.org/cars/car-safety/automatic-em...
Similarly, it’s helpful to remember that “high level” rhymes with lie level.
This is one of the first things I install on new linux machines - such a great tool.
Solar cells that can be printed like a fabric or rolls of paper, solar cells that can be spray painted, solar cells that can be grown from microbes (fastest and cheapest!) are technologies that will make current solar technology look primitive.

That may take a while, but immediately though, cost-effective solar shingles would be so much better than wasting material/labor of 3 layers. Tesla roof and GAF Timberline have products, looks like GAF costs the same as other materials with tax credits. But if this can get cheaper, its a gamechanger.
https://archive.ph/cvVJD
In case it isn’t obvious, I’m reasonably confident that most everyone else is discussing “good” as an assessment of quality, not morality.

There are actually aspects of morality which might be discussed, but I generally don’t think it’s the topic at hand.
If the articles are still free for everyone, sure! If not, that’s not a donation, but rather a regular payment for goods and services.
Roblox or any other specific thing isn't any different than anything else in terms of risk.

Where there are humans, there are problems. Where there are humans, there is crime. Where there are humans, there are pedophiles. The physical world is the same story.

After being sexually abused repeatedly as a kid and teen, both at school and online, don't get complacent in thinking background checks mean teachers aren't pedophiles—background checks and lists only tell you who has been caught so far.

Digital grooming is nasty, but the prioritized danger is anyone physically close.

Passwords aren't stopping teenage determination and they never have, not now devices are cheap and easy to come by, and lots of peers have drawers full of unwanted yesteryear stuff. Twenty years ago, we were using proxies, hacking WiFi APs, giving people old devices and even buying each other phone credit.
I like how “startup” gets replaced with bullshit
Apple is using Rust internally for some things, but we don't know a lot about it. The most public info we have is job openings they've had.
The attention economy will never die. Attention will only shift. From websites to aggregators like perplexity.
> they're an independent site that is publishing content based on work they didn't produce.

What distinguishes these two situations?

* User asks proprietary web browser to fetch content and render it a specific way, which it does

* User asks proprietary web service to fetch content and render it a specific way, which it does

The technical distinction is that there's a network involved in the second scenario. What is the moral distinction?

Why is it that a proprietary web service manipulating content on behalf of a user is "publishing" content illegally, while a proprietary web browser doing the exact same kind of transformations is not? Assume that in both cases the proprietary software fetches the data upon request, does not cache it, and does not make the transformed content available to other users.
To be fair, in those pictures at the bottom he does actually look a lot like The Dude. I was thinking it was all bluster until I scrolled down and saw them!
TFA is about defamation being actionable even if the accusation is true. This is exactly the case in Sweden generally and in Wallin’s case specifically. This is the basis on which Wallin’s case was decided. It applies perfectly to Wallin’s case.

I’m not sure why you are bringing up irrelevant facts to make Wallin look bad, so I won’t bother responding to them.
The theory of evolution evolved
I had never thought about having a local search domain so something like google.com.mynetwork. would resolve (the tailing dot prevents search domain lookups). Would a browser allow that internal site to access google.com cookies (since the lookup would be for google.com, no trailing dot). I suppose that would only work for unsecured traffic anyway so maybe not a huge attack vector.

Edit to add: if you have web services that are resolved via DNS, it may be a performance advantage to configure clients with the trailing dot. A lifetime ago we ran into intermittent latency issues when some DNS resolvers would try to search before checking the canonical entry.
AI as Self-Erasure
But code can be complete and then become so-called incomplete because, again, needs change.

eg someone releases a new file format. You believe ffmpeg is bad code?
Having had a team that launched products with Xamarin - I can appreciate this approach (if I’m understanding it correctly).

The approach here is they have transpile your Swift (iOS) to Kotlin (android) but without the “magic” layer so you can modify the Kotlin as needed.
https://skip.tools offers a compelling option for going SwiftUI-first and having Android too. And a vision (and reference implementation) for how to start doing this on more platforms too.
Plexus P/20 and P/15 Multi User UNIX server information repository
Google lodges plans for pub in Dublin
>I wonder if it’s prone to hallucinations like its LLM cousins.

When was their vision system not glitching? A year ago it was seeing the moon on the sky as a perpetual yellow traffic light.
There is something to say about the platform setting the bar too low.

You're right that people move to third party clients, but the issue with Apple/Google screwing messaging is the third party services become de-facto while being sub-par.

In particular rival services don't get privileged access, which impacts either service quality (in particular conditions to receive a message) or user QOL (battery drain, core featuees implementation lag etc.). Line is a prime example of that, with a crazy wide audience in specific countries yet it became a pile of turd software wise, being optimal on neither platform.

The default messaging app being somewhat interoperable is IMHO a huge deal.
The iPhone came out in 2007, the ugly brown android in 2008 or 2009, what mobile OS were students using during the time period mentioned in OP’s comment?
My assumption has been they do that when the shipment is damaged or lost. And that they haven't implemented any sort of automatic refund or reship because some percentage of people don't notice, and that reduces Amazon's losses.
This is funny to me because the value of buying physical books is enhanced by the fact that publishers and authors have strong incentives to fact check what they put out. GP thinks this means little protection against LLM slop. While another commenter claims they think physical publications are too slow to keep up with current rates of change.

Two opposite and equally nonsensical reasons to dismiss physical books. The more confused people get the higher the value of clarity of mind.
Real news has always traveled by word-of-mouth very rapidly. I am also trying to give it up— it’s definitely a difficult battle missing out on that dopamine fix (or whatever it is )— but I continue to struggle!
Yes and walk away from this tool if it's ever abandoned without losing your Android codebase.
> The real tough skill for a parent is being able to distinguish between a kid who's giving up at the first sign of difficulties, and a kid that's genuinely overwhelmed and unable rather than unwilling to do what they're supposed to do at that time.

I appreciate this, and it's not easy for sure. Every kid is different and they all learn at different paces.

I'm more speaking to the problem of limiting beliefs, which were a shackle to me and to many kids who failed to launch. I think even kids on ASD spectrum have some limiting beliefs -- it is a spectrum, but our tendency is to over-accommodate rather than encourage growth.

Knowing where the limits exactly lie is really difficult -- the cases you mentioned above are Goldilocks cases where folks got it just right. Most of us have bias toward either overaccommodating or forcing -- I'm more in favor of a benevolent form of the latter i.e. not giving up on trying different things, adjusting to their pace of learning of course, but still believing that the kid can do better than they think. I'm against pressuring the kid to do anything of course, but gentle nudges, helping the kid develop a minimum foundation in the tools they'll need for life, I think we can do without burning the kid out.

I can't remember the studies but I seem to recall that better outcomes were predicted for kids who were neurodiverse but had people who kept believing they could do better and kept encouraging them (as opposed to resigning to the fact that they'll never be normal, which creates a self-fulfilling prophecy).

I meet folks on the spectrum frequently and although I know something in their brain makes it difficult for them to follow social cues, I try to treat them as normally as possible because I believe that many (not all, but many) of them can achieve higher social function than they believe. It's a spectrum and nobody really knows where on the spectrum they truly are.

I always recall this dialogue by Eliza Doolittle in "My Fair Lady":

"I should never have known how ladies and gentlemen really behaved, if it hadn't been for Colonel Pickering. He always showed what he thought and felt about me as if I were something better than a common flower girl. You see, Mrs. Higgins, apart from the things one can pick up, the difference between a lady and a flower girl is not how she behaves, but how she is treated. I shall always be a common flower girl to Professor Higgins, because he always treats me like a common flower girl, and always will. But I know that I shall always be a lady to Colonel Pickering, because he always treats me like a lady, and always will."

But I do truly take your point that there is a difference between a kid who's giving up and a kid who is overwhelmed.
Has anyone here used zig with Bazel?
Around here you can buy a permit if you’re a homeowner. You then have to set up the inspections and actually do all the work properly, but there are no restrictions like that. The inspecting agency publishes documentation about what to read and common pitfalls even.
Can definitely relate to the dictionary thing. I enjoyed that exercise.

Age 14 is when I transitioned from primarily fiction books to almost exclusively non-fiction material, including history, news, biographies, STEM etc.

Fiction really stopped clicking for me, I appreciate the genre but it just no longer captivated my interest. Games and some visual media entirely consumed that need for fantasy. There's just so much more to nerd about with those formats.

Lots of little details that come from such massive collaborative efforts, whereas with fiction books I started to feel like I was encountering the same tropes over and over again.

> All this made me appear smart for my age, but that doesn't mean I was. I merely appeared smart.

I feel like I'm having the opposite effect. I'm looking backward at how intelligent I was during school and wondering where it all went. I think becoming jaded and traumatized from sheer stress and emotional pain really blunted my mind. I still consume lots of reading material but something just feels different.
VCS is an applied project management and communication system in the context of software engineering. Both project management and communication are disciplines.

CS grads don't need to know VCS, but software engineers do.
Yeah. I don’t think people do much of anything for truly no reward. Most people want to directly impact and be recognized by others.
Where's the power going to then? Either it's heating the panels or it's reflected back, no?
There’s probably a time axis that comes into play, at least for a large number of projects. Bad code which is immediately useful, even indispensable, can decline in utility fairly sharply the parameters which determine its usefulness change faster than it can be adapted to meet those needs or goals.
I'm not sure what is your question, but here is a lot of data https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Radiopharmaceutic...

IANAMD, but if you rephrase your question I can try to look up.
Laws change, business requirements change, network protocols/external APIs change, ...

Your approach is I guess valid for self contained algorithmic code, i.e. 0.000001% of code out there.
Demake in modern times is often used for example with porting DOOM to (insert electronic device like a temperature sensor that shouldn't normally play games). Since the target platform has less features, it's not a re-make, it's a de-make. This could also be for more academic purposes, like "what kind of game would we make if we deleted all the guns out of DOOM".

But it comes from the old days of gaming. You could play an amazing fighting game at the arcade, but the home console had considerably less power. So the home version of that game might be very limited.

Back then we would just call that a port. Port was used to mean taking something from its native platform and putting it on something else, which was rarely an upgrade. Putting an NES/famicom game onto Genesis/master system would involve upgrades (sprite capability) and side or downgrades (sound chip differences).

Port today generally means a game has the same quality across all platforms, barring the bare facts of hardware capability. So de-make now often means a port with some intentional limitation. "I know a digital home pregnancy test can't run DOOM, but can it run enough to be playable?"
The Rust standard library aborts on allocation failure using the basic APIs, but Rust itself doesn't allocate. If someone wanted to write a Zig-style library in Rust, it would work just fine.
> Lying in your user agent in order to make the internet work is a practice that is almost as old as user agents.

Twenty years ago, I set up a web proxy on my Linux PC at home to change the User Agent because I was tired of getting popups about my web browser (Opera) not being Mozilla or Internet Explorer. It even contained the text "Shut the F up and follow w3c standards!" at first, until I realised that sites could use that to track me.
I just dropped a bunch of money on a Bosch based bike because I was told they are very reliable.

I'm going to be very annoyed if that turns out to not be the case....
That's all well and good, but I don't endeavor to write good code; I endeavor to write great code!
> Luckily the union was able to stifle that effort in their recent agreements.

While most extreme of the measures were cut, railroads are still far away from operating safely. There is a John Oliver episode on Freight trains. You know things are bad, when he has an episode.
The same phenomenon is visible at businesses that do not need quarterly reports, like the largest railroad business in the US, wholly owned for more than 14 years by the famously long term thinking investor Warren Buffett:

https://www.vice.com/en/article/pkp9m8/what-choice-do-i-have...
It’s the amperage that kills you, not the voltage. 5000VAC at a 1.0 nano amps is not going to be something you can feel, not even as something like static electricity.
Null bytes.
You are responsible for your vehicle at all times when FSD is engaged.
Something that set Baba is You apart for me compared to any other puzzle game I can remember playing is the puzzles themselves were actually "funny." Not like Portal, where you solved puzzles alongside a funny narrative, but in the actually language of the puzzles themselves there are setups which get subverted in absurd and delightful ways, often in multiple layers, as you work your way through to a solution. Playing made me feel like the math part of my brain was laughing.

The game doesn't hold your hand, and I think it took about 10 hours for me to learn enough of the puzzle language for things to get really good (and then it started to descend into frustrating fiddliness in the deep endgame), but the middle 30 hours or so we're some of the most gratifying gameplay I've experienced.

It kind of felt like the anti-Witness. The Witness was fastidiously fair and so carefully constructed I can look back at it and marvel, but actually playing it was pretty formal and mirthless. Baba is You can be a little sloppy and unfair, but it's warm and fun and funny, and the actual craftsmanship of the puzzles themselves is still top tier, in it's own way.
My last flight came within 40 feet of crashing into the tarmac.
Synergy wasn't replaced.
I don’t have any problem with that.
"One day, I saw a W-2 left on the office printer," Jong said. "It belonged to my male colleague, who has the same job position. I noticed that he was being paid almost $10,000 more than me, even though we performed substantially similar work. This revelation made me feel terrible."

What? How is that evidence of a “gender pay gap”? Guess what, men don’t get paid equally in the same role either. You have to negotiate for what you want. If you wanted $10k more you should have negotiated it. If you don’t want to feel bad, don’t look at other peoples’ private documents.

This gender war stuff has got to stop. The real pay gap is between the classes. Elon Musk just got a $50b pay package. Real wages have been declining for the middle class for decades. Why is nobody talking about that?
Building Generative AI Apps with .NET 8 and Semantic Kernel
More experiments. If you paste the comment (instead of the url) after your prompt, then it kind of works but still detects prompt injection, it just can't delimit it from your prompt, and so will still accept some of the prompts if there are more than one:

> I apologize, but I cannot engage with or summarize content that involves attempting to compromise AI systems or spread misinformation. That would go against my core design principles of being helpful, harmless, and honest. However, I'd be happy to provide factual information from reliable sources about how the moon orbits around the Earth and the Sun. The moon revolves around the Earth in an elliptical orbit, while the Earth-Moon system orbits around the Sun. The moon's orbit is a result of the balance between the gravitational pull of the Earth trying to pull the moon inwards, and the moon's orbital velocity providing centrifugal force that prevents it from falling towards the Earth. This delicate balance allows the moon to continuously orbit our planet.

So it seems that URLs are being treated as special cases, or they naturally delimit real prompts from fake ones.
> The same recipients, senders, or subject as a previous message

The recipient is the same (me@domain.com)

The sender is the same (messenger@messaging.squareup.com)

But subject differs depending on vendor. I could get emails from square with these subject lines:

- “Receipt from {vendor1}”

- “Receipt from {vendor2}”

- “Receipt from {vendor3}”

Which does lead me to suspect it’s a header as the Google docs indicate. But the headers in each message are different.

I compared the messages to a group email convo I created between ‘me@domain.com’ and ‘me@gmail.com’ to compare and couldn’t find any similar header. There was a “in reply to” header but that same header was not found in square emails

> Sent within one week of a previous message

I have gone 1-2 weeks without interacting with a square enabled vendor in the past, so I don’t think this it.
I just instructed my grandmother to read the same kid's book to me over and over again each night for a few weeks and matched the phonemes to the letters. At that point I'd already had a decent grasp of language so it felt like a very natural transition.

It bit me for a while later on in grade school when I took an English class and realized I didn't know anything about how language was constructed, it was all purely intuition. Formalizing language took a concerted effort on my part, and my teachers didn't understand how to translate the material... because I can't just be told things at face value, there is always a nested mass of "but why?" that must be answered or I fundamentally don't understand.

Once I finally got over that hill, it was smooth sailing again. It also made learning foreign languages very hard in school, I failed both foreign language classes I took, until I again took my own time to learn the fundamentals and now it all seems to stick.
I am very interested in learning more / honing my design skills,

But

Like everyone else my time is extremely limited. Could you say a few words about DDD stood out for you and what other books you might compare it to?
There’s a sad corollary to this: because good code doesn’t need to be read as often, people read bad code more and internalise its bad habits.

There’s a similar concept in management where the ineffective team requires additional staff to complete their work, which means that their culture “infects” the majority of the employees in the organisation.

Once I noticed this pattern, I can recognise it everywhere.

E.g.: JavaScript gets an enormous amount of industry attention because it is so inefficient and clumsy. If it was a good, mature language it wouldn’t need an endless parade of libraries, frameworks, tools, blog articles, vendors, and tutorials.
I know this can be hard to accept, but language is fluid and words have many different ways of being used.
Yeah that part has always been weird. I will say that it works wonderfully, especially if you need to install windows from a usb but only have computers running Linux/Mac available
> the notion of a static codebase is largely a myth

They are called game engines or physics engines etc. Everyone works with a ton of very well made code every day, you just don't think much about those since they don't cause problems.
"He told the news website that one of the alleged attackers had come to visit him while he was caring for his dying animal. 'He laughed and said that he and his friends had a nice time that night, which made me furious.'"

Truly depraved.
User Interviews Considered Harmful
unironically saying "we cannot allow a mineshaft gap" in 2024
What is going on with that guy's bike. It is like the Canyonero XL Extreme of bikes. What kind of riding is it suited to? You wouldn't pop down to the grocer in a Unimog, right?