skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There are photos in the article references! I didn't find one of the kitchen.

https://curlytales.com/this-was-the-worlds-longest-bus-route...
https://www.techtraveleat.com/story-of-london-culcutta-bus-s...
Lying takes our brains down a 'slippery slope' (2016)
> There are objective collapse theories that lead to different physical predictions.

Yes, that's true. So far all of the ones whose predictions can be tested have failed the tests. But if one were to succeed, yes, that would falsify the MWI.
Backpac – Your Gateway to Seamless Blockchain Connectivity
Yeah, I remember seeing that one; I thought of buying it, but I'm sure it'll just trigger my "screw it, I'll stay asleep while half of the neighborhood secretly hates me for the morning noise" adaptation. I don't think I ever experienced a noise I couldn't sleep through.
So far, we only have a prebuilt Player component for React, but it is definitely possible to integrate Revideo into a Vue project with a bit of hacking. I'd love to better understand your requirements and help you get started. I already did this for React so porting this over to another framework like Vue should be straight forward - feel free to message me in our Discord server (invite link is in our repository) or email me at konsti at re.video.
GPS spoofing messing airplane clock
There was an issue with Google bucket. I fixed it. Should work well now. Thanks for the report.
> Russia did not target (initially, now they are) major essential civilian infrastructure like power plants.

Initially, Russia was planning a decapitation strike and to take Ukraine relatively whole afterwards, either by annexation or installation of a puppet regime or a mix of the two.

They started heavily hitting civilian concentration with no military value as a terror tactic pretty quickly when the swift decapitation strike bogged down, and then started hitting civilian infrastructure where the combination of attacks on military targets and terror civilian attacks didn't produce a collapse that left them in control.
Who decides which ideas are good and bad? I assume you wouldn’t want regulators to have retroactively forced Apple to keep floppy disk drives in their computers. Or cdrom drives? It’s just the “obviously bad” ideas that should be banned, right?

Do you have a crystal ball that lets you know ahead of time which choices are good and bad? Even in retrospect I’m not sure Apple made the wrong choice with the lightning connector. It’s a better connector in just about every way than micro-usb, which was the only standard alternative at the time. Apple’s experience with lightning was rolled into the design process for usb-c, which as I understand it they were heavily involved in. USB-c might not exist as it does today without Apple’s experiments with the lightning connector.

Even if we pretend you’re better at picking winners and losers in the tech world than Apple and Samsung, do you think regulators are going to be as canny as you are with this stuff? US politicians don’t seem to understand the difference between Facebook and the internet. Are you sure you want them making tech choices on your behalf?

If you ask me, I think regulators would make a dogs breakfast of it all. If they were involved we’d probably still have laws on the books mandating that all laptops still have parallel ports or PCMCIA slots or something. The free market can sure take its time figuring this stuff out. But competition does, usually, lead to progress.
I'm adding to my list "using ancient tech". Not because I think that orgs should always be on the new shiny, but to me using old tech is a yard stick for uninteresting and low-growth culture WRT software engineering; is there an interest in technology? Do the people there like to code for fun? Are they open to improvements in the way things are done? If I know that you're happy still using TFS, jQuery, ASP.NET Razor, etc, I can probably guess the answers to a lot of those kinds of questions.
Boards are supposed to be forward-looking. Typically a board would electively reward a CEO who has delivered out-sized performance out of fear that the CEO would leave for a different job (creating a bad future for the company).

This situation, though, has a different set of forward-looking concerns. Musk already has several other jobs. And the primary concern is that he wants this large pay package so that he can have more personal resources to put toward those other jobs (at the expense of Tesla).

As it stands now, Musk’s personal financial position depends on leverage against his Tesla position. This binds him to Tesla’s future performance. Giving him a huge personal pay package essentially weakens that binding, giving him greater license to deprioritize his Tesla leadership in favor of SpaceX, Xai, Neuralink, etc.

There is an argument to be made that Tesla’s board should be essentially antagonistic toward Musk’s other companies, given that his time and attention are finite resources, and Tesla is a public company. The board has responsibilities to investors to maximize their return, which should take precedence over whatever feelings of gratitude or connection they feel toward Musk personally.
I know of at least one instance in which an employee at a $BigTechCompany was put on a PIP, successfully completed the PIP, and was fired the following week anyway. Box-checking exercise indeed.
Musk was always the money and hype guy - he has personally built nothing. Tesla was not founded by him, SpaceX is Gwynne's baby, not his. Twitter still hasn't recovered from being X'd by Musk.
No, crates will be statically linked anyway in general.
Yeah, if it was just stock, then its value fluctuates wildly
Ubuntu on RISC-V
> What more do you want?

I believe in honouring deals, even if it’s unsavoury ex post facto. Until recently, that meant approving the pay package.

But Musk unilaterally amended the deal when he “threatened on X…to develop AI elsewhere if he doesn’t get a 25% stake in Tesla” [1]. Then he developed AI elsewhere [2]. If you promise to give me a dollar, you dither, I say I’ll burn your house down if you don’t, and then I burn your house down, I don’t believe you owe me the dollar anymore.

Musk should offer to return xAI’s funding and merge it into Tesla in exchange for the vote.

[1] https://apnews.com/article/tesla-elon-musk-pay-package-share...

[2] https://x.ai/blog/series-b
This static SDK is just one example of Swift's new support for user-definable platforms, timed to amplify support for embedded and WASM.

Along with the move to a non-Apple GitHub organisation, it represents real progress in extending swift to other platforms.

It would be interesting to see if this is used for the AI OS that they are inviting researchers to validate for security purposes.
Fair enough on the CSS, and I didn't realize autosave is already done, thanks!

I did see the '---' collapsible and that helps but only if you have one section you want to collapse. I'm perhaps more visually-oriented than most, and being able to hide extraneous material helps me focus.
Not talking about anything, talking about one specific idiom. Are you trying to assert that the idiom is not racist or misogynistic at all?
Telepathy is around the corner, with Neuralink it will be possible somehow.
Yes, Cloudflare through the `loader` prop in `Image` component.

See CF docs for what the url should be https://developers.cloudflare.com/images/transform-images/tr...
Next.js docs should tell you how to write the loader
Have you checked out the static linking option announced yesterday? Portability has increased a lot.
> With Google, Apple and Samsung having their own locked-in strategies there is now no pathway for Grok to any relevance(

Why wouldn't Apple license Grok?
Starts at https://youtu.be/wm9B-oofY9g?t=306 and follows with more examples.
Perfect, appreciate your response. I have been paying for 1password but don’t like the idea of losing access or functionality in my credit card expires for example.
Amazingly useful, definitely powerful and easy to use software.

I know I sound like I am just repeating the title, but that's my honest, user opinion too. Does what it says it does, does it well, and stays out of your way until you want to use it.
Most people know that Musk lies constantly. I think the smart thing for Apple is just to ignore him.
>I don't think either has ever demonstrated that.

So what's your space company called?
Note that Orwell promotes an hard form of the Sapir Whorf hypothesis called linguistic determinism meaning that a language would make it impossible think certain thoughts. This is obviously wrong.

Have you ever experienced anything for which you didn't have the words to explain? This already proves that you can feel and think things that are not easily expressed in the languages you know. Also some people don't even think in words but are more visual thinkers.

But even for the softer version, linguistic relativism, these is not much hard evidence.

You subjective experience is not easily measurable. Yes, the act of learning new languages can gives you new perspectives and enrich you as a person because it gives you access to a whole new culture but that is different to saying you can suddenly experience new forms of emotions because you didn't have the words for it before or see more colors.

I recommend this Tom Scott video on the issue:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmZdGo6b5yA
Or in more general terms "HR is not your friend!"
UPDATE: Evidently Hacker News removes the hash appended to the end of a URL so it doesn't go straight to the entry :/
I might do this one day. I'm upping the amount and power of the LEDs in our house slowly, though I feel my wife still isn't convinced that I really mean it when I say that I. need MORE LIGHT to function.

(And none of the "warm light" crap, that just makes me sleepy even if I'm awake. Neutral or cold only. I'd go for high-CRI ones if I could find them in LED strip format.)
> If you're the sort of person that cannot decode what a "Performance Improvement Plan" means then you're going to be eaten by the industry alive. It's insane to me that we even need qualified people to reassure anyone about that.

Business and employment works with good faith. A lot of people work with good faith. If your manager suddenly pulls a PIP, the good faith is broken but the managers continue to lie that PIPs can be surpassed. It is the lies that detract people - especially the ones that are clinging to the job for valid reasons like family, mortgage, visas etc.

American companies have abandoned good faith. Gen Z is learning it from millennials and abandoning corporate America. Articles such as this one are just highlighting to people how to recognize bad faith.
Not everyone is born with the innate ability to decode corporate doublespeak.

I’m glad you know what a PIP is – how about a little less judgement for today’s 10000? https://xkcd.com/1053/
Grand ideas about structuring society often have an egotism problem. The ego behind the ideas turns its critical lens outward without looking inward. Naturally it ends up telling the world what to do.
Why do I keep seeing this exact comment and what the hell is grook.ai? Can you provide some context?
If you sync, apple notes are stored plain text in icloud

BTW anytime a notes app comes up I feel the need to let people know that there is an option to bulk download your apple notes at privacy.apple.com
Wasn’t the real iconic soundtrack just a song from FSOL ? I mean nothing wipeout related at first …
Tennessee and New York feud over Long Island iced tea's origin
I'd watch Elon Musk starring Kanye West as Elon Musk.
I'd be pretty peeved if I backed a non-profit through its most-risky early days only for them to turn around and shun the original philanthropic mission in the spirit of profit maximization...
A recluse like Kaczynski with the resources of someone like Elon Musk would be world or at very least American society levels of quite interesting
I mean yeah one block is 8 units right? Two pins per encoder which both need a unit each.
Doesn’t this contradict Robert Shiller who shows that housing returns are flat in the long term?
With theos, and I install them through SideStore or directly sideload them as a dev on my device. I could use App Store Connect if I had a dev account for that too
> Open-source projects depend on their community and contributors, and community management is inherently political. No matter what "neutral" thing you do, some contributors will approve of that, and some will see it as a red flag.

There's this saying some people have, "there's three things you don't talk about at work: sex, politics and religion". (I think an older version had "money" instead of "sex"–from the days when sex wasn't talked about so much that we didn't even talk about the fact that we didn't talk about it.)

And it isn't necessarily bad advice. Do we really want heated workplace arguments about Israel-and-Palestine, Biden-vs-Trump, etc? We have to work with people who have completely different views from us on big picture political issues. Sometimes it is better we just agree to disagree and focus on what we have in common – airing those disagreements in detail can just produce negative feelings and disruption.

But of course, every office, every open source project has politics. But that's the thing, people traditionally draw a distinction between "micropolitics" (the politics of our workplace) and "macropolitics" (national politics, geopolitics). You cannot escape micropolitics, it is everywhere, it is inevitable. But macropolitics, yes, we should avoid it at work whenever possible.

Of course, people will then bring up "the personal is the political", and it is true. Transgender issues, for example: a big political controversy, but obviously for transgender people a very personal one.

However, even there, I think there is a useful distinction. A transgender employee isn't breaking the "no macropolitics at work" rule by being transgender, or talking about their personal experiences, or so on. But, consider Lynn Conway's public campaigns against the psychologist J. Michael Bailey and the sexologist Ray Blanchard – even though that was obviously very personal for her, it wouldn't have been appropriate for her to carry it on at work. Well, she actually did use her UMich web page for those campaigns, but the norms about this are different in academia than in your average workplace.

And politics is personal for all kinds of people: I remember back in 2010 when the Israeli military intercepted the "Gaza Freedom Flotilla", the team I was in at the time had some very heated discussion over it. Afterwards, a Jewish team member talked to me privately, and I could tell the whole discussion had made him feel rather uncomfortable, because it felt personal to him. And one of the other participants in the conversation was Palestinian, so it was obviously personal to him too. But still, in hindsight I wish the whole discussion had never happened, and I regret my own (rather peripheral) role in it. We broke the "no politics at work" rule, and it did pointless harm to our cohesion as a team.
What will we exchange? Language? Memories? Streams of sensory stuff?

Because language is, in the big picture, very very small.

And if we were going to exchange memories etc, we might have to encode it.
Great tool, using it for several years already.
There are plenty of articles by respected international relations and Russia experts you can find that explains it quite clearly.

The IR community does not share Mearsheimer's take. He is very much known to be the exception. Which is why he's the only one we're referring to by name here, because his analysis is so contrary to the overwhelming consensus of experts.
I am pro trans rights, but this only looks like a ChatGPT response to be honest.
IMO the problem with tools that are great "when used correctly" is that if they don't force that "correctly" part
or the feature works in such a way that people just fall into correctly due to path-of-least-resistance, then people don't use it correctly. This, again IMO, is why people have problems with Exceptions. It is that they don't have these qualities and they are almost universally used incorrectly... thus the new languages have eschewed them much like they eschewed heavy handed OO abstractions. They were tried and found to be lacking for their intended purpose and alternatives are being tried.
Yeah, I’m lucky in that I’m pretty stable now in which games I’m playing and they all run flawlessly via Proton or Lutris. It seems to mostly be the controversial kernel-level anticheats which don’t play ball or where devs don’t enable the Linux support flags for things like EAC which cause a problem. For those, I kinda just have to suck it up and play something else.

I did have a ton of issues with NVidia in the same environment, but after putting a Radeon card in it has been smooth sailing. That’s to be expected I guess.

I doubt I would have tolerated this even a few years ago though and would have ended up like yourself with a dual boot setup.
I think this is taking it too far. There are a lot of money and hype guys out there, none of the rest of them transformed the automotive and space industries. Most of them were shoveling money into "disrupt laundry" startups instead.
Big AI is just the same old boys club that governed IT since the 1980s, it seems.
I haven't used it yet, but I've heard really good things about Vapor as far as server side Swift goes...

https://vapor.codes
> - Native C, C++, Java, Rust and JavaScript interop

dart doesn't do C++ interop
As does LaunchBar, the Great Grand-Parent of all cmd-space launchers.

While I can’t claim to have used it in the NeXT era, I am pretty sure I have since Mac OS X Beta

https://www.obdev.at/products/launchbar/index.html
It’s like hurting cats.
This looks like lots of fun.

I’ve only skimmed the docs and nothing jumped out on this: would it be possible to use a 3d canvas context? For example, integrate a dynamic three.js layer/asset into the video?
Pardon my ignorance but don't trans people just want to be identified by their apparent gender without a qualifier?
San Francisco schoolchildren are being failed by California
I suspect so. I've been seeing increasing amounts of outrage about it over the last several weeks, anyway.

This is the wrong moment in history to dramatically ramp up our power usage. We need to be doing the opposite of that, and we've already had a few big ramp-ups over the last several years.
I'm not really sure I understand your point - isn't it self-evident that there is new data available to different fields at different rates at different times? And that when there are fewer available data points, each newly available data point has more potential to totally shake up a field? We can quibble over what a "trickle" means, but to use an example from my own graduate research (Chinese Literature), pretty much every piece of scholarly research written a hundred years ago is now considered wrong, totally outdated, or requiring huge caveats. I personally wouldn't call that a trickle.
Wasm? Care to provide source for that?
I think you already mentioned a few interesting ideas. Ultimately, we'll just build what our users want and see from there.
Well, triplebyte is dead. That’s one reason not to do the experiment.

Also arguably the “customer” for triplebyte was the company that eventually hires the candidate. They’re paying in part for the screening process triplebyte did. We wouldn’t have been doing our job if we skipped the interview part of the process.
Before you write off their claims I encourage you to read more about the detailed specifics (if you have the technical footing and inclination to do so). While the approaches should certainly be probed and audited, it’s clearly more than performative. https://security.apple.com/blog/private-cloud-compute/

Also a good thread from Matthew Green, a privacy/cryptography wonk, on the subject: https://x.com/matthew_d_green/status/1800291897245835616?s=4...
You're right. I'm lying. You passed the test. Anyone who remembers a less commercialized, plaintext Internet is a stooge planted by Big Unix.
Love flameshot, use it all the time!
It was part of my move to try to make as much of my stack GPL as possible.
Swift is elegant, beautiful and concise, whereas Rust is an ugly verbose sigil mess.
The reason I love is that I can create pixel-perfect screenhots and precisely pick what I want to cut out and, if necessary, add arrows, text, etc. It also allows you to copy into the Clipboard and now Facebook and others allow me to paste images, which saves me the effort of going through the file system.
I've never done these before, or Kaggle competitions in general. Any recommendations before I dive in? I have prety much zero lowe-level ML experience, but a good amount of practical software eng behind me.
In all those cases you probably had a lot of intellectuals driven there basically by communist or nazi militaries. Then if you're an Einstein type dropped in a refugee zone why not start a tech business? Or encourage the kids to.

Related if you look at "(R&D) expenditure as share of gross domestic product (GDP)" the top are (https://www.statista.com/statistics/732269/worldwide-researc...)

1 Israel

2 S Korea

3 Taiwan

4 USA
This reply just raises all sorts of questions.

Is there an objective definition of "macroscopic" within the framework of QM? How does a system decide whether it's macroscopic or not? As far as I can tell I'm just swimming in a sea of bosons and fermions doing their thing, there's no "macroscopic" label that distinguishes the atoms of iron in my vacuum chamber wall from the atoms of rubidium in my vacuum chamber's magnetic trap. They're both following the exact same laws of physics at any given moment. (Laws which, AFAIK, satisfy time-reversal symmetry.) Of course, some systems have many degrees of freedom, which makes the calculation very difficult and exhausting, but that's our problem, not the system's.

When does your calculation get to drop branches of the wavefunction, and when does it have to keep track of them? Deciding this policy seems like an important step of shut-up-and-calculate.

And most importantly: which MWI claim contradicts observation?
Why do service providers who provide inadequate service need protection? They choose to be shitty service providers and they suffer the consequences. Basic free-market right there bud - either the market wants the same thing as the activists and money, prestige, etc flow to those who agree with the activists, or the market doesn't want it and those service providers who the activists are happy with fails.
Just to be clear, you're saying that Shotwell has contributed more to SpaceX than Elon?

What about, without Elon they'd have reusable rockets but without Shotwell they wouldn't? Do you believe this?

I get you hate Elon but at some point these takes are just so outrageous I can't believe you are making them in good faith.
I believe in Monads and the Monadology. I'm living best life and my life shouldn't effect yours. I think you probably agree with that sentiment and I am not trying to disagree with you - just discuss what I think after I personally read what you said.
Yeah if you asked the average person on the sheet (e.g. you) if they thought Siri was 100% private, they'd say yes because Apple has mislead them and said it is. That's the point. Apple says everything is private but then secretly collects data via their privacy policies.
Any progress on the license situation? I'd love to work more on it, but worried about it being a bit of a dead end due to uncertainty about the future of the license and not being able to use it in any commercial projects.