skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Have you checked out 8bitbubsy's extremely accurate modern clone of FT2 (and one of Protracker as well)?

https://16-bits.org/ft2.php
There are many places where labour is cheaper than china.

But then you visit one of the electronics markets in shenzen, and see why everything is still there. Just look at eg. "strange parts" videos on youtube. Need 64 gig memory chips for iphones? Just visit a physical store and buy a few. Need more? Just ask the guy there, and he'll find someone to sell them to you. Walmart ordered christmas ornaments from your plastic company? Need blinking led modules? There are 5 companies nearby that will sell them to you, and you can get them in days, not months. Something like this doesn't exist anywhere else.
Ask HN: Why do Amazon deliveries fail?
In recent years, my Amazon orders have been much more likely to be delayed. But in the past few months, I've experienced a worse pattern. Items become "Delayed", then very delayed, then Amazon offers and eventually begs me to cancel the order. I've let this ride for a while and found that the package will just never show up. It will be "delayed" indefinitely, with no progress for weeks. Yet I can cancel the order and immediately reorder the item, and it'll show up the next day.

It feels like I'm "rebooting the router" on a logistics flow. I'm interested if anyone has worked to close to Amazon to explain what is going on with stuff getting stuck this way.
Including extra, legacy agents isn't hiding because they include their distinct identifiers too.
You can use non-temporal writes to avoid this, and some CPUs have an instruction that zeroes a cache line. It's not expensive to do this.
I think, and this seems obvious to me hut apparently it's not, that what the author is trying to say is that 5G is useless unless it provides a benefit in peoples lives, and so measuring base stations doesn't actually tell you anything, if it's not useful to people no number of base stations matters.
Am I missing something or does the article fail to explain the point of Arrow’s Theorem? Is it satisfied for the discrete case, provably impossible, or what?

> While this applies to discrete rankings and voter preferences, one might wonder if it’s a unique property of its discrete nature in how candidates are only ranked by ordering. Unfortunately, a similarly flavored result holds even in the continuous setting! It seems there’s no getting around the fact that voting is pretty hard to get right.

I don’t follow any of this paragraph.
If the memory is above the size of a page, you can tell the VM to drop the page and give you a new zero filled one instead.
Arguing with something/someone by labeling it (too) perfect is a bit of a signal for me. Criticizing perfectionism is often just a lazy way to argue for one's side—usually to argue for doing less, but notably the less that doesn't matter to the arguer. Requesting more QA time, improving load times, getting one more feature in could be perfectionist, but have to argue against the particular thing not perfectionism.

The thing I most worry about using anti-perfectionism arguments is that it begs a vision in the first place—perfectionism requires an idea of what's perfect. Projects suffer from a lack of real hypotheses. Fine, just build. But if you're cutting something important to others by calling it too perfect, can you define the goal (not just the ingredients)? We tend to justify these things by saying, we'll iterate. Much like perfectionism can always be criticized, iteration can theoretically always make a thing better. Iteration is not vision and strategy, it's nearly the reverse, it hedges vision and strategy.

This is a slightly different point, but when we say we don't need this extra security or that UX performance, you're setting a ceiling on the people who are passionate about them. Those things really do have limits (no illusions!), but you're not just cutting corners, you're cutting specific corners. That's a company's culture. Being accused of perfectionism justifiably leads to upset that the company doesn't care about security or users. Yeah, maybe it's limited to this one project, but often not.

I agree with others that on a personal level, perfectionism is a lot of individual procrastination. I'm commenting a bit more about groups, but it might work quite well to look at the leader as procrastinating on strategy by calling downstream work perfectionist.
Zero values is just bad
Yes but I'd have to drive way out into the Southern California desert on a moonless night to have a chance to see it. Those areas aren't exactly safe.
That was to test the user-agent hiding. The broader problem—Perplexity laundering attribution—is where the scraping vs retrieval question comes into play.
>A shame that it isn't broken out into an explicity "Why Odin" page.

This make me think that every programming language web site should have a Why $language page, either as the home page, or prominently linked from it.
This one is cheap and light and works great on various bikes but on a 29er:

https://a.aliexpress.com/_Eu2mwYj
The article is about Amis.
This work proposes a more accurate means of dead reckoning using a quantum-level source for inertial measurement in an Inertial Navitagation System (INS). Useful for robotic navigation underground, inside RF-shielded structures, on other planetary bodies, or underwater. The issue of localization error drift reduction from INS's seems very much like a Moore's law challenge, though I haven't mapped out the advances in intertial measurement accuracy/precision by year to see if the projected rate is similar or not. In any event, pretty cool; we'll see if this one pans out.
Go's debugger has worked just fine for years. What do you prefer about gdb (which also seems to support Go)?
Not sure you can talk about perfectionism without clarifying between "healthy" perfectionism and "unhealthy" perfectionism.

Both exist, but often people are thinking of one or the other when discussing perfectionism, and it creates cognitive dissonance when two people thinking of the two different modes are singing perfectionism's praises or denouncing its practice.
Wow, check out https://github.com/jthlim/JavelinPattern ... guy's been busy.
Every time the topic of perfectionism comes up, a lot of people come out of the woodwork with a weird fetish for arguing that the psychological establishment is using the term wrong. To what end, I'm not sure.
The same for every other type of software's web site, of course.
Improve Cofounder Trust and Cooperation: Nonviolent Communication with AI (MVP)
> Adding features to a code means it was incomplete.

That definitely implies code can't be good if needs change, which makes no sense to me.
> Adding features to a code means it was incomplete

In practice this isn't true. The code may have been perfect and complete according to the business requirements of 1 month ago. But the business requirements of 1 month ago and today are often completely different.
I feel like oil and those sorts of things would be even worse on a belt?
Triggering at both a security and a sexual deviancy level.
I don’t think zero values is a good idea on Odin. In Zig, anytype will be a mistake.
Skip: Build iOS and Android apps using Swift UI
Yes, this is an issue. It hasn't been that long ago that DARPA ran the challenges that led to the proof of concept for self-driving, autonomously navigating robot vehicles. Some of the technology became the selling point for various automobiles with some of the promises still lacking in deliverable results. You have to test all this to know whether it will work and eventually some of the tests need to shift from a workstation to the real world. Like the Air Force and their recent conversion of some fighters to unpiloted planes, this will all happen and one day it will be the norm. If we're all lucky all the test failures will happen on a server somewhere instead of out here in real life.
Haven’t read this one, but have read a few - “Domain Driven Design” (by Eric Evans) was the most influential for me.
Ready since 2019: https://youtu.be/5cFTlx68itk

Robot taxi: https://youtu.be/5cFTlx68itk?t=121
In other words, content is bait, reward is a captured user whose attention - whose sanity, the finite amount of life - can be wasted or plain used against them.

I'm more than happy to see all the websites with attention economy business models to shut down. Yes, that might be 90% of the Internet. That would be the 90% that is poisonous shit.
It goes hand in hand with the always connected lifestyle.

Work Slack at 10pm.

Your kids having phones at school 'just in case.'

People upset you didn't text them back for last minute dinner plans.

Something beyond first world problems at this point. Things I'm not even allowed to reject or resist. (I do resist.)
I'm willing to bet that most electric mountain bikes are ridden on roads.
I fully expect in a 50 years social media will be a bad memory and Wikipedia will be stronger than ever.
The Wikipedia entry on text-based user interfaces uses IT as an example of a text-mode program featuring a pixel-accurate mouse pointer. The "citation-needed" had always been annoying me, since I knew it was true, but I couldn't prove it. Now, we can finally link to IT_MOUSE.ASM and be done with it.
Adding features means it was incomplete. Good code can essentially always be built upon instead of modified.
I would start by fostering a culture within the organization of adopting and experimenting with AI, then take small steps and gradually scale up as the organization becomes more comfortable with this technology.
Don't worry, HN will almost instantly post archive.is pirate links.
Books and movies have no morals and so they cannot be good or bad.
Yes, that's literally why "user agent" is called "user agent". It's a program that acts in place and in the interest of its user, and this in particular always included allowing the user to choose what will or won't be rendered, and how. It's not up to the server what the client does with the response they get.
This is only partially true, and not relevant in most cases.

In game development, my primary field of expertise, the notion of a static codebase is largely a myth until the project nears completion.
Most projects span several years, during which the code undergoes continuous evolution.

In this context, code must be as fluid/malleable as possible, because its entire structure is likely to change several times, to add and remove features, to improve performance, to fix bugs and sometimes for even deeper rework.

If the already written code is hard to read, these iterative modifications become unnecessarily arduous.
> I'm confused by this as that is exactly the point made. :)

Sorry, I was trying to indicate that it is significantly simpler for a random uninterested or mildly-interested consumer to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of solar than it is windows. Most people have a good sense of how much their energy bill costs, and there are plenty of cheap and free tools which let you accurately estimate how much energy you will save from a PV system, but even basic mental math is enough. As opposed to windows, which are significantly more complicated because they involve thermodynamic modeling of your home.

You should read recent work by Zachary Berzolla, who is now working in Maryland’s department of energy on their commercial buildings decarbonization program. His MIT PhD dissertation is specifically about willigness-to-pay for home energy retrofits (but especially heat pumps). Not sure if it has been posted to DSpace yet but I believe some various conference/journal papers are online already.
It's probably more because they're pulled into this kicking and screaming, e.g by the EU, when for years they internally decided iMessage was the moat they'll never give up even a millimeter of.

If privacy was the primary motive trumping everything else they'd have ported it to android a decade ago to reduce sms use.
Let me guess, you work on game engines?
This is why I mentioned 2/3 - why keep a reductible fraction?
> And what do you mean by “your data” here?

The website that they created.
This squares with my experience in the demo. It’s 98% there but that 2% is adding a lot of cognitive load and stress, so it’s a negative ROI.
Think about what the model is doing:

It’s sampling from a statistical distribution of likely tokens, one of which is the correctly spelled variable name.
At some point we'll have to be ok with longer names?
yes. so much this. many times unnecessary changes are getting pushed because people blindly run these commands. i always use SourceTree to check my changes before pushing.
I'll contextualize it better for you as I don't think you understood the unifying theme of two Wiley-related articles:

May 16th: Wiley shuts down journals over AI use: https://www.theregister.com/2024/05/16/wiley_journals_ai/

June 13th: Wiley book series is going to be using AI: https://qz.com/for-dummies-books-publisher-john-wiley-sons-a...

My interest in Wiley is that my late uncle helped them to "go digital" decades ago, and remained remotely as a proofreader, editor and fact-checker for physics titles. He would be spinning in his grave if he weren't cremated. Honestly depressing to see it happen.

Ten bucks says there's LLM-generated content in encyclopedias today because LLMs have been mainstream for a few years now, and even prominent scientists and experts have been caught out "writing" with LLMs.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01268

Why wouldn't there be LLM-generated content in encyclopedias today if it's been (ab)used for several years now? Seems a little naive, especially when even Wiley (wow) is openly embracing AI now with a sudden heelturn.
DC interferes with your heart's rhythm much, much less though, due to being constant. AC's frequency easily causes ventricular fibrillations even at low currents and voltages. AC is considered potentially lethal starting at 50V. For DC it's 120V, because it's significantly easier on your heart.
It matters a whole heck of a lot if Arm is able to destroy the Oryon, which they're trying to do in court.
The Forest: Rediscover the joy of getting lost on the web
The reason the trailing dot works is that it represents the implicit root DNS node. Browsers do the dumb thing and consider it a different domain, but AFAIK there's no good reason not to canonicalize the domain name.

All that to say, no, you sadly can't add another trailing dot.
In France, there is one that seems to match your needs:
https://www.leboncoin.fr/ad/ordinateurs/2379851136
but it's quite expensive!
> I wonder if it would be slightly less sad if we all had our own decentralized crawlers that simply functioned as extensions of ourselves.

This is something I'm (slowly) working on myself. I have a local language model server and 30 tb usable storage ready to go, just working on the software :)
In the U.S., a product called REMfresh is available that releases melatonin over a 7 hr period. https://www.nestlemedicalhub.com/products/remfresh-extra-str...
Surprised nobody brings up the numerous recalls of Tesla, especially the recent seatbelt one. All this rightfully knocks confidence in the brand—like Lancia having to pull out of the UK after their rust issue ruined their rep.
I agree, it could do with a little more proofreading. Arrow’s theorem states that no voting state which ranks candidates can satisfy the the given conditions.
> ... heat and light all tend to degrade perovskite.

Have no knowledge in this field but if your solar panel material degrades in light that would seem to be an insurmountable problem to me.
I’ll tell you about my mother-
An Enigma Machine Built in Meccano
is "building upon" different from "adding features", in this new terminology?
You don't think Wikipedia isn't being inundated with LLM-generated shite? And you haven't seen the AI-generated slop on YT with fake voices reading bunk info over slideshows?
> git's not exactly perfect

Somewhere in an alternative universe, we're building all of our version control tooling on top of Pijul... Maybe even with AST-aware diffing.
Yesterday a Model X just changed lane into me. I barely avoided hitting it.

Not 100% sure but it almost seemed that it was in self drive mode. Or, the guy with MIT sticker at the back was just a bleeping bad driver.

They are making things worse for everyone.
> I'd prefer correct user-agent, that just common decency and shouldn't be an issue for most.

Tell that to the Chrome team. And the Safari team. And the Opera team. [0]

[0] https://webaim.org/blog/user-agent-string-history/
You've become a labor activist radicalized by systematic curtailing of your organization rights?
Rousseau's book Émile was written in the mid-18th century and talks about educating the youth. It's interesting to read about his view of education and the similarities and differences to today. Your last paragraph makes me think you would like that book.
Here is a simple example. If you made your website only work in say, Microsoft Edge, and blocked everyone else telling them to download Edge. I'd think you're an asshole. Whether or not being an ass is unethical I'll leave to the philosophers.

Clearly there are many other scenarios, and many that are more muddy, but overall when we get in to the business of trying to force people to consume content in particular ways it's a bit icky in my opinion.

The extreme end result of this is no more open web, just force people to download your app to consume your content. This is happening too and it sucks.
Show HN: Mkv.to: Effortless MKV Video File Conversions
I think most places get around this by having you pay for so many months at a go, instead of each month. Less flexible but I don't mind it.
If Arm had its way, Oryon would be destroyed at customs.
What Makes Language Models Good-Enough?
Precisely! Well, I suppose Arnold runs bad code in Terminator. Well, I suppose suppose it might be good code according to Skynet.
You get this with anything that hasn't been mass-produced at a large scale and commodified for a long time. It's more remarkable that something like a car (or a mobile phone, or a CPU) is cheap than that something like an electric bike motor is expensive. And it could be that this is a poor application for this type of motor technology and that a better type will be developed and that we'll look back on this as an expensive relic that was holding us back.
There were some news articles a couple years back about theft being one cause of such failures. Entire containers being swiped off a train, for example.
Ideally no, but there are established norms and unwritten rules. Plus, a mechanism was built to communicate the limits. These norms were working for decades.

The fences were reasonable because the demands were reasonable and both sides understood why they are there and respected these borders.

This peace has been broken, norms are thrown away and people who did this cheered for what they did. Now, the people are fighting back. People were silent because the system was working.

It was akin to mark some doors "authorized personnel only" but leaving them unlocked. People and programs respected these stickers. Now there are people and programs who don't, so people started to reinforce these doors.

It doesn't matter what you prefer. The apples are spoiled now. There's no turning back. The days of peace and harmony are over, thanks to "move fast break things. We're doing something amazing anyway, and we don't no permission!" people. If your use is benign but my filter is preventing that use, you should get mad at the parties who caused this fence to appear. It's not my fault to put a fence to protect myself.

To see the current state of affairs, see this list [0]. I'm very sensitive to ethical issues about training your model with my data without my consent, and selling it to earn monies.

I don't care about how you stretch fair-use. The moment you earn money from your model, it's not fair-use anymore [1].

[0]: https://notes.bayindirh.io/notes/Lists/Discussions+about+Art...

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39188979
Learning from people one disagrees with, instead of finding offense and misunderstanding, is another useful and overlooked skill.
Not nearly as easy to navigate and discover as apps like Stellarium.

Now, if they had the database with hundreds of terabytes of objects that NASA has for their OpenUniverse simulation they’re running for the upcoming Roman space telescope (see https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasas-roman-mission-gets-cosmi...), then maybe I could understand why it is so confusing.

As it is, I don’t really understand why it has to be so confusing.
I don't, because if it will, then someone like the author of the article will do the obnoxious thing and ban it. We've been there before, 30 years ago. That's why all browsers' user agent strings start with "Mozilla".
Have you found a good place to read about slightly less current events? I feel like most articles are little salami slices of events as they occur, without context.
Noticed this person didn’t want people to access the code for fear of misuse. Thankfully, someone else has already made this for flipper zero before them and released the code!

https://github.com/leedave/flipper-zero-meal-pager
Most belt drives are run dry so the oil doesn’t attract dirt in the same way
What does AI for Math mean? People doing Math research that want to transition to AI research?
>And then what? AI needs humans creating original content, especially for things like journalism and fact-finding. It'd be an eternal AI winter, all LLMs doomed to be stuck in 2025.

It's in every AI developer's best interest to halt the likes of Perplexity immediately before they irreparably damage the field of AI.

That’s exactly the problem and we all know that it will happen.
For my order just cancelled two days overdue with no update after 'out for delivery' after two fumbles logged earlier in the process, it was doomed from the start by the carrier being Hermes/Evri. I would never willingly use them to send anything, and would have refused to have my order sent via them if I had had a choice. The entire ownership of the firm sets them up to fail IMHO, even though all carriers can have bad depots/drivers/days. I suspect some new bean-counter is optimising for cost with a rather short-term view of cost...

When getting my refund I said "please please do not use Hermes/Evri." Let's see if someone runs the stats properly...
Congrats and I am sure a lot of work went into this.

That said, here's some stranger-on-the-internet feedback: I don't know what your product does and the landing page lacks fit and finish.

Is this a form builder that saves responses to notion? Or it's just inspired by notion? (If I say I am uber for kitchens, my service has nothing to do with cars.)

Your video needs to be storyboarded and could use some title cards. It probably needs to be split up into multiple videos. You can cheaply hire an editor to help with this. Landing pages are a lot of work, almost as much as the product itself. This is hard to accept if you're an engineer.

"Create beautiful forms and surveys with NdbForms" – this hero copy needs to be really, really tight. Currently it sounds like just another form builder. I assume you do something different. Don't repeat the name of your product since I'm already on your landing page. A human copywriter will knock your socks off and they're even cheaper now that everyone uses AI for this stuff.

Consider some user testing. Get on zoom with a potential customer and send them to your landing page. Just listen as they try to figure it out. You'll learn a lot.

Does notion have an app store? the big advantage of building an integration with an existing platform is they help to get you distribution. when i google "form builder for notion" i get a lot of results. it's a crowded space. if you can't easily break into the top 3 for your niche you're facing an uphill battle. If you're a solo dev, it's not possible to compete by building a better product. It's much better to "win by default" by being early to a less-competitive niche.

the best feedback hurts the most! i hope this hurts!