skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Also the more blatant fact that OF COURSE the CEO of Palm is going to be bearish on the damn iPhone, otherwise they would have made the damn iPhone at some point!

How often does a direct competitor CEO outright say that they expect a new competitor product to not be underwhelming?

99% of the time a CEO says anything future looking that isn't regulated by the SEC, they are just leaning on suvivors bias to look good retroactively.
Wow, that might be why AirPlay always gave me issues. I’ve been on channel 153 for 5GHz forever. Thanks!
> It's unfortunate to say this, but it's basically one of the only good anime I've seen in maybe a decade. Most of the stuff out there is so terrible...

A lot of the shows that get meme'd to top status are pretty terrible at writing. The top shows are more about drawing style + music rather than contemplating the story.

The strongest "story" shows of the 2014 through 2024 decade are:

* Ranking of Kings

* The Promised Neverland S1 (S2 drops the ball but at least finishes the story).

* I actually have a softspot for Studio Trigger's "Little Witch Academia" (2017), an innocent school-setting / slice of life. Its probably my favorite Studio Trigger work actually (Gurren Lagaan is their best stuff ever IMO, but that was done when the team was still technically Gainax). I would argue the "techno-witch" Croix Meridies, who serves as the antagonist (with her "break tradition, embrace technology") has aged well as we moved from 2017 into 2024. The focus on tradition from the protagonists (and Shiny Chariot + her motif of the North Star) vs technology+progress (Led by Croix Meridies, obviously a riff on the Southern Cross / South Astronomy) is a simple, but relevant, debate. Nothing outright villainous but instead is a lower-stakes debate appropriate for the setting, and I bet it will be a timeless story moving forward.

Its Studio Trigger however, so expect things to get kicked up a notch as the ending arc comes about. But the bulk of the storytellilng / philosophical debate is well thought out and likely timeless.

* OddTaxi

-------

I'm slowly going through what many have considered were thoughtful anime of the past decade, but I haven't actually finished these yet.

* Sonny Boy

* Rascal does not dream of Bunny Girl sempai

* I'm surprised by "Toilet Bound Hanako-kun" and need to see where its going. Genre-aware ghost trying to help the main character is... actually fun. And the characters were deeper than they were letting on.

-----

I know everyone likes Frieren these days, which I do consider anime of the year. But I purposefully am leaving it off the list for "top of the last decade". I do think other shows have deeper stories / better thought out characters than Frieren (even if Frieren is above-average compared to typical popular shows). Frieren being the best of the popular shows is quite different from best thought-out overall.

I admit that I haven't seen any "Delicious in Dungeon" yet. Maybe its good, but that will have to wait and see until I get a chance to watch it.
what I haven't seen mentioned in the comments is that Triplebyte had so much funding to just have a database of 250k users / engineers.

Yeah, at that scale bootstrapping would've been the way to go.
And nobody cares about how absolutely terrifying your statement truly is, because the shiny benefits obfuscate the destruction of privacy, despite Apple's reassurances.
To be succinct, ownership implies control. This is a very old legal principle.
> Is the reason that you can get employers and workers to commit to salary ranges like this, that you're focusing on mediocre resumes?

I don't think so. Of the signups that have come in from this thread, most of whom have pretty respectable if not quite impressive resumes, about 80% chose to give a salary range and about 2/3 of those are OK sharing it.

I don't think most people are averse to sharing salary information. I think they just don't like the guessing game or the feeling like they're weakening their negotiating position, and having someone in the middle revealing things only with precommitments by both sides alleviates that quite a bit.

> (BTW, the below sounds like it could be a good/great thing. I'm not criticizing it, just curious whether that's also why requiring salary ranges upfront would work here, when normally both parties would be resistant.)

Yeah, no offense taken at all! It's a reasonable question. To be clear, though, we don't require salary ranges; we just ask for them voluntarily.

If one side or the other doesn't want to share that info, that's fine - we just won't give them the info the other party gave us either. If they don't want to share it even internally with us, they can do that, but that just means they get noisier matches, which isn't really to their benefit. But that's their choice.
80% of those 20% of the times it doesn't work, it's just because the receiver's phone either doesn't have Bluetooth turned on, or it just isn't unlocked.
>After the right-sizing, Twitter has rolled out more features than they ever could before.

People keep saying this, but what are they? Community Notes were introduced before Musk, exposing internal impressions' stats is kind of a trivial feature, just as boosting paid blue checks in replies. Maybe Spaces (I don't use that)?
Just need to install windows on my phone, duh.
Ah, now you're asking me for a piece of info that we're all predisposed not to share =P. You're right, in that situation I think everyone's much likely to give a credit card number over to a tool with no personality and less likely to give it over to a human.

> We have a certain degree of trust for people and a certain degree of trust for tools. I think people almost strictly will trust the latter more than the former with sensitive information.

I agree with this, I just personally feel that I lean more toward trusting people. But honestly it all depends on the context of what information is being asked. Your credit card number is a great example.

For an example on the other end of the spectrum, I'd be a thousand times more likely to hand over my real email address to a person than I'd be to give it to a tool (i.e. web form, app, etc.). These days I only assume the worst intent when something asks for my email address, but with a real person I know they just want to talk to me.
No they just switch from "Mac doesn't have X" to "Welcome to 20212 Mac"
Sorry to intrude into this discussion but... Franxx is a different level than Kill la Kill.

Have you seen the two shows? I know if you've only seen Kill la Kill where the BDSM "Disciplinary Captain" gets power from whipping himself, it sounds like things can't get any more hypersexualized, but somehow Franxx made it more awkward than Kill la Kill ever made it.

A big problem is that the romance / dating aspects of Darling in the Franxx were front and center, so the characters are supposed to have sexual attraction / romantic feelings for each other. So somehow all these sex-jokes just landed differently / in a totally different context than Kill la Kill's more joke-heavy style.

Somehow its different when the characters involved are "seriously" romantically involved with one another. Because now we as the audience are seriously considering the implications of these positions or sex-jokes / whatever.
The technology is very cool- it's a shame to see this is from 2008 and for whatever reason, it hasn't caught on in the last 15 years.

On another note, I find the idea of solarpunk really appealing, but don't come accross many specific recommendations (even this article only mentions one book)- anyone here have any good shouts on where to start?
Their disincentive to delivering it is that it's not actually possible.
10+ years in software development. Solid experience on both front and back end. Business/Entrepreneur minded and I thrive at startups.

Location: Caldwell, ID (US)
Remote: Yes. Can work hybrid/on-site in Boise area.
Willing to relocate: no
Technologies: Javascript/Typescript, React, Vue, Node.js, Python, PHP, Tailwind, Electron, Storybook, Docker, Postgresql, AWS, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama
Resume: https://grabify.link/T3WD15
Email: On the resume
> Bitwarden has been lagging in implementing any consumer features for some years now...

This is actually the reason why I like Bitwarden. They don't seem to be constantly trying to push unwanted features on me. I've always been a fan of the first "rule" of the Unix Philosophy: do one thing well.
I don't think it would've looked bad for their brand to have not participated. Apple successfully avoided other memes like touchscreens laptops and folding phones.
> Last year Google deleted 175GB of data that I'd been storing on a paid account for 10+ years.

Hopefully that wasn't your only copy. You can currently get a 12TB hard drive from Amazon for $90. You can probably fill that up with five generations of an entire family tree's digital memories and put it in a fire safe. For a few hundred bucks including the safe.

Not your drive, not your data.
Safari has issues with audio pitch correction on sped up videos.
Watched this earlier today myself, fantastic work by the author.
It goes beyond mere CEO. When you say "Hey I built thread!" people will think you're talking about one of:

- threads.com: Another tech startup (recently acquired)

- threads.net: Instagram (must I say more?)

- the thread protocol: https://threadgroup.org/

I don't think naming will hinder adoption of your product, but it will cause needless confusion for your (potential) users. Up to you whether you care or not, though!
AI doesn't have to be intrusive but this "personal assistant" stuff, which is what they're marketing to the general public at the moment, certainly is.
I don't know how they are going to square the privacy circle when at worst its a RAG based firehose to OpenAI, and at best you can just ask the model to leak your personal info.
> I'm pretty sure those points do not apply to ChatGPT integration.

You’re absolutely right. I got too excited about Apple’s strategy to encourage developers to use Apple Private Cloud Compute.

The UX for ChatGPT as shown for iOS 18 makes it obvious that you are sending data outside the Apple Silicon walled garden.
> As far as I can tell, D's templates and CTFE are as powerful as Zig's comptime

You might very well be right. I didn't realize that D's templating was much different from C++, I don't know much about the language. I'll also note that the sibling comment you refer to wasn't posted when I wrote my reply.

I'll note that a careful reading of my post, and the one it was responding to, will reveal that I didn't claim that Zig was the only, or first, language to improve on C++ templates. Only that it's an example of a more modern language which has done so. But I'm also largely ignorant of the ins and outs of D.

It seems that you, however, are not. Here's an example of Zig building a data structure at comptime:

https://ziglang.org/documentation/0.12.0/std/#src/std/compti...

Is this an example of something D could do as well? If so, I'll be sure to give the language credit the next time the topic comes up.
Along with a 2GB RAM difference, they have different processors (A17 vs A16).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_A17

Per the comparison table on that page, the "Neural Engine" has double the performance in the A17 compared to the A16, which could be the critical differentiator.
Oh my god, finally. I can't get over how bad Siri is, compared to Alexa and Google.
Someday Google could very likely terminate gmail accounts that block youtube ads

Then there is this which just scrolls on and on forever

https://killedbygoogle.com

(or https://gcemetery.co )
You can permanently disable OpenAI from training with your chat data for your account:

“To disable model training, navigate to your profile icon on the bottom-left of the page and select Settings > Data Controls, and disable “Improve the model for everyone." While this is disabled, new conversations won’t be used to train our models”
Has anyone used the SigmaOS browser? I was surprised to learn that Orion isn't the only new WebKit browser project right now:

https://sigmaos.com
Buy the rumor, sell the news.

A tale as old as markets.
Hope I can keep apples fingers from getting "deeply integrated" with my personal data.
Privatized DMVs in Ohio were the absolute best DMVs to go to. Actually, I'm pretty sure they called them BMVs, but still, the private ones were great.

The public DMVs in Ohio wern't too bad, but there was a clear lack of motivation to move customers through the process. Once I got to a state which had no private DMVs....thats when I saw the real horror :(
I've never had two in-person interviews that were at all similar in any way.

Maybe instead of a 'practice' interview people can just be told what to expect so they know how to prepare.

Offering practice interviews just makes it sound like the interview is a performance.
Sorry that is my mistake, to clear it up:
1. Yes the API key here is the OpenAI key
2. The tool at the moment cannot be pointed to local models, though I am adding support for that. My focus right now is the following, in order of priority:
- Self-hosting the proxy server (priority)
- Adding support for local models

Ideally having the self-hosting would also allow people to switch things to use their own models (hosted) as well if need be.
And why wouldn't it be? The strain on Microsoft servers and the free use of their resources by iOS users with very little, if any, in return is a win for Apple. Not so much for OpenAI or Microsoft.
So, what's the more pleasant path? I'm well more than 7 years in at this point. And I've spent precious little time in the job market at large. But if my current employer had a problem, it's occurred to me that I don't really know how to find a job. What do people do?
Copenhagen doesn’t even seem to be well defined unlike Pilot Wave, Objective Collapse, GRW…
It's not reasonable to expect to be able to turn off "any part" of a piece of software, unless it's open source and you're digging through the code yourself to remove sections of it, refactor and re-compile everything.

That said, Apple generally gives people very fine-grained controls over what software features they want enabled, at least compared to other closed-source software vendors.

My question "what part and why" was intended to open up a discussion about privacy in regards to Apple's AI. But if your answer is simply "none of your business", then my answer to the question "can I turn it off" is simply "nobody has any way of knowing yet." Neither of those answers are great discussion openers.

Your username seems to check out.
I find the removing people from photos thing creepy.
Yes you can remove others to see only your family, but forging the reality to only conform to what you wish is disturbing I think.
> infact google still uses a 2.2 kernel with all custom back ported updates of the last 30 years.

Linux 2.2 is from 1999. It can barely do SMP. That's pretty much a crazy person claim.

Googlers say ProdKernel is merged forward every few years:

> Every two years or so, those patches are rebased onto a newer kernel version, which provides a number of challenges.

https://lwn.net/Articles/871195/

> Every ~2 years we rebase all these patches over a ~2 year codebase delta

https://events.linuxfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/0... (and many other places)
I don’t really understand this kind of comments that complain without any specifics. Worse how? I use two family subscriptions and a corporate one for many years and haven’t noticed any regression in functionality or UX. They release time to time minor quality of life improvements and continue supporting modern platforms. 1P7 to 1P8 upgrade went without any problems on all platforms I use. IMO this is the best password manager on the market by many measures.

What is your experience exactly?
might be slightly easier to set up DoH with a service you trust as the provider. Most browsers have a setting for it.
I'm sure a simple Webkit vulnerability (there's none of those, ever, right?) will definitely not ensure that Semantic Index is featured in a future pwn2own competition.
OP chiming in here to say that there's truth to this perspective. It is very easy to miss the forest for the trees in product work.

That being said: the product the top of this thread was talking about did have users and did break even financially, even operating with some pretty major inefficiencies. So while it would be wrong to argue with that poster about what they liked, they are empirically wrong in the claim that no one liked it.
If I understand correctly, Copenhagen became generally accepted because it was around for several decades before many-worlds.

> You're saying: it just is, deal with it. That's unsatisfactory. Copenhagen proponents never seem to have to defend their stance, and you're telling me they don't have to because they're the majority.

I'm saying that Copenhagen is the de facto default, no matter what you think should be. If you want that to change, you have to change peoples' minds. These being scientists, you typically need some evidence to make them change their minds - they're not going to do it just because you think they should.

Without evidence (impossible in principle, if Copenhagen and many-worlds make the same predictions), you can argue that one shouldn't have a firm stance on this, since both interpretations give the same results, and there is no experimental way of discerning one from the other. (This looks a lot like "shut up and calculate".) Or you can argue that the philosophical position of many-worlds is more "parsimonious" or better in some other sense, but that's philosophy, and that doesn't persuade scientists all that well.

TL;DR: If you want people to move from where they are to where they aren't, give them a reason. If you don't, don't be surprised when they don't move.
California and EU law require keeping data like that to be opt-in afaik, so it doesn't need a promise to not do it.
Still no re-nameable virtual desktops? Bummer.
San Francisco population: 808,437 as of 2020 (Wikipedia)

Palo Alto population: 68,572 as of 2020 (Wikipedia)

Traffic fatalities per capita in San Francisco in 2021: 3.7 / 100,000

Traffic fatalities per capita in Palo Alto in 2020: 5.8 / 100,000

Also, 2020 and 2021 aren't comparable due to the pandemic. Traffic fatalities in the United States increased 10 percent from 2020 to 2021 [0].

[0] https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/...
How to be American tourist in Europe: pretend you're Canadian.

How to be Chinese tourist in America: pretend you're Taiwanese.
Ha, good point. I'd actually be curious whether those apps had (bogus) privacy policies or just went without altogether.
Agreed. Apple pretty clearly focused on building an action-tuned model. Also, notice how in the videos you barely see any "Siri speech". I wonder what they used for pre-training, but probably they did it with much more legit datasources-- They're launching with English only.
I even have the same problem from me to me. My phone to my mac. Bluetooth and all that is on.
It's not racist. It's automated political correctness.

Facebook and Google are full automated Kafkaesque decisions. As long at it affects small percentage of people and don't affect the bottom line it's going to be like this.
Nonono it's the apprenticeship business school model where you work summers to learn the ropes from your uncle who speaks trade Spanish + bankrupts a leaf-node company on every claim and penalty
Nothing really impressive. Let's see who the stock reacts.
Was this when the term was coined?

I’ve always thought it a little interesting—some older video games, the game Creatures, maybe some of the Final Fantasy games, possibly Myst(? I didn’t actually play it), seem to have a sort of pseudo solarpunk aesthetic. Mostly I think because they wanted to have puzzles and doodads that were sort of interactive, but also free-standing, and also they wanted to have “old stuff” littered about, so it needs to be renewably powered, to avoid hard to answer questions about who’s going around these ancient ruins fueling all this stuff up.

Or possibly solarpunk just drew inspiration from this stuff, I don’t know.

Anyway, it is a cool vibe.
> I can't really imagine how it would be implemented.

People do stuff that they claim implements it using trusted, "tamperproof" hardware.

What they're ignoring is that not all of the assurance is "cryptographic". Some of it comes from trusting that hardware. It's particularly annoying for that to get glossed over by a company that proposes to make the hardware.

You can also do it on a small scale using what the crypto types call "secure multiparty computation", but that has enormous performance limitations that would make it useless for any meaningful machine learning.
>Is a person* able to sell something while restricting how it can be used?

Of course, this is the domain of contract law. Often car companies restrict how soon a desirable model can be resold and for how much.

edit: And robust anti trust enforcement keeps contract terms reasonable.
Contracts are limited by unconscionability and superseded by legislation but otherwise fair game.
My corp desktop is an iMac Pro (2018). For a long time, it was the best way to get a Retina-quality desktop without getting into VFX budgets. It was also in that weird period in Apple's product calendar when the one-and-done trash can was obsolete, but its replacement hadn't been released. Work usually issues whatever panels they can buy in bulk from overseas, but for a magical window, we could get a nice screen with no shenanigans by ordering an iMac Pro.

My heart dropped for a second when I saw Sequoia only supports iMacs from 2019, until I saw it supports iMac Pros from 2017. I wonder how much longer I have before Apple stops releasing updates, and corp IT decides the iMac Pro is now e-waste.

It's really unfortunate that they don't do Target Display Mode anymore. These iMacs have panels that are still top-of-the-line 6 years later. (A Studio Display is basically an iMac Pro with Apple Silicon in Target Display Mode.) I wonder if there will be a Linux distribution to convert these things into monitors when they go obsolete.
I do believe much of what they showed was impressive. It actually seems to realize the "personal digital secretary" promise that personal computing devices throughout the decades were sold on.

The most important question to me is how reliable it is. Does it work every time or is there some chance that it horribly misinterprets the content and even embarrasses the user who trusted it.
I would suggest using a statically generated blog for this. You could even have individual posts for the days things occurred, as opposed to rolling it all into one email every few months (although that one email may be better composed than the individual posts).

Somewhat similar: For over a decade now, I've had an automated means of photos being sent from my phone to the PC, and eventually into blog posts. It will scan the photos, and generate a post for each day there is a photo - putting all the photos of that day in the blog entry. I can select which photos to keep, and put any captions on them.

My captions aren't well thought out compared to this approach, though. But if I did want to make the 3-4 emails per year like the submitter day, it's really handy to have all the photos in individual blog posts. I just go through them and get a record of what we've been up to in the last few months.
no one is saying “There is no isolationist strain” either, just that it's inconsequential and meaningless

> ‘counterbalanced’ (whatever that means)

ah, you are engaging in bad faith. adios!
I'm still on v7, what did they break?
And ProdKernel generally lags mainstream by only a few years, as can be seen in the things you linked to.

The change being talked here is moving from merge ~2 years to merge all the time. Saying they're stuck on something from 1999 is ridiculous.