skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Implementing an LLM Deception Eval with the UK AISI's Inspect Framework
I browsed yours as I like the idea of scraping g wha ti capture. Couldn't see any screenshot or figure out if there's an android app though
I would say it’s best to let the voters affected vote for what they want, but they must also live with the consequences, and they don’t have much choice. Then if it’s awful they can reconsider, that’s why democracy works, rather than than all these technocrats telling us what is best for us; give us your arguments technocrats, we will decide what we do with our lives.
Person who doesn't pay a tax, actually likes the tax.

In other news: water is wet.

In all seriousness, doesn't this also impact cab prices? How much is a typical fare for 15min ride in central London?
Not if you’re worse off for it.
The courts shouldn't be so stupid as to not recognize that Google id deliberately trying to play the system to avoid binding precedent generation and embarassing continued discovery. The exact purpose of the Courts in the first place.

Might as well just come out and say it. The justice you get is what you can afford to pay.
The EU really needs to ensure Apple cannot interfere with apps intended for third party app stores.

Apple being able to do stuff like this is outright taking the piss.
I can't plus this enough. I hired a unicorn business minded, brilliant, can solve any software engineering or UI/UX problem engineer who happened to have a predilection for functional programming.

I found out that unicorns are unicorns.
omnifocus by omnigroup. todo
amphetamine. nosleep
Selling is something we do well. We're very badmcamp-y. Lmk if you wanna chat, shokunin at dns.xyz
I'm a big fan of PastePal. It works as promised, syncs cross-platform, and has a dirt cheap one-time payment.
The secondary intent is to crush the real market at any price to keep Tesla customers from competing with Tesla.
Great idea!

Added: https://github.com/hoffa/year-on-a-page/blob/main/renders/20...

EDIT: I actually updated it to omit the day when it's the first day of the month. So instead of A1, it's just A. In the visual progression, seeing "A" seems to be enough to imply "we're now in August (1st)", and it's a little less visually cluttered when quickly scanning. Hopefully it's still clear, happy to adjust!
Certainly, London's air has gotten noticeably cleaner in recent years. Although I suspect most of this gain is from incentivising zero-emission vehicles through the congestion charge exemption and also the ULEZ ultra-low emission zone (an additional charge on older dirty vehicles), not just from reducing traffic volumes.
> You can inspect anything, patch anything. When paired with an editor, that means you can only apply part of the code and then rerun part of the code. You can also try stuff and then formalize stuff down in code, no need to rerun the whole program.

I’ve heard this a lot about Lisp. But doesn't this lead to greater cognitive complexity because every time you patch your running code, you have to keep in mind the state of the running program and mentally check whether your patch affects any part of that state?

A lot of people do data analysis this way in R/Python who aren’t programmers either by training or for a living, and it is not a practice that generally leads to bug-free outcomes. This has also mirrored my experience with Emacs which is a Lisp machine, maybe getting closer to Common Lisp’s programming environment.

Is this process of runtime modification fundamentally different in CL? What am I misunderstanding?
New NASA Black Hole Visualization
Nobody goes to jail for piracy, nobody is going to go to jail for this. Especially since proving piracy is infinitely easier than proving something was AI generated.

While I wasn't clear, you're also willfully misunderstanding me. The point is that none of the adversarial tools work, and I have strong doubts that any of them will ever work as a fundamental facet of how the data is processed by these models.

Though you may be surprised that you can make a style LoRA that preforms well off ~8 images and you can condition a model off a single image. Though if you're still doubting me I invite you to pose a challenge for my 8 year old GPU. ;)
I get the feeling that this guy is an insufferable twat.
I don’t care what they were inspired by, because that’s not what we’re talking about. The comment I replied to said that brains ARE neural networks, in a literal sense. This is a common misconception, but is well known to be just that among people who are actually well-informed on the topic. Just because you don’t understand it doesn’t make it any less true.
I’d love to get a peek at your config or setup - I’ve used Astro for a while because I just got too bogged down in my old vimrc, especially after migrating to Neo a while ago. It’s fine, but fiddling is less than stellar and I know my performance overhead is higher than it could be
How many of these are driving through NYC on a daily basis?
The elasticity doesn't matter for the equivalence of the two scenarios (head-on collision at 50 vs. brick wall at 50). We've assumed, albeit implicitly, that in the head-on case, the cars have equal and opposite momentum. Whether the collision is perfectly elastic, perfectly inelastic, or somewhere in between, a car will experience the same forces in the two scenarios (assuming, of course, that the elasticity is equal in the two cases).
Remember, this is from the company that thought that laying off their Python team was a good idea.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40171125

Draw your conclusions of the level of support for this library.
Continuing with the dev bio theme, I'd suggest kicking off a mid-life crisis with a decent microscope, petri dishes, and maybe some planeria or something else to study.
Welcome to the new era of AI, where there is no objective truth and no one knows what they are talking about.
I think most of them would like to see NYC razed to the ground to be honest when I’ve had to work in the area as field support just chatting with the locals. It’s much the same as with Chicago in Illinois.
While I know Apple isn't exactly stopping this sort of knowledge discovery and distribution, I don't know why they aren't helping it, given that any increased demand of their hardware would just result in more hardware sales
That last paragraph...
And yet somehow those incompatible telephone systems, rail systems, power systems, and everything else all came into existence.

USB is widely highlighted as an unusual success. But Apple has notably created their own incompatible connectors, and made money that way, which is why Europe is busy forcing a charging standard.

Gasoline is very obviously government regulated. 2 by 4s are only sort of standardized.
>[the legislature] must still be able to actually legislate

No, it doesn't have to.

Remember, the legislature is voted by the electorate, the voting public at large; the people of the city, county, state or country as applicable. If the legislature ends up so divided that passing laws with a supermajority to overrule executive vetos is impractical if not impossible, that suggests the people are divided and cannot come to a consensus on issues to be debated.

Why should the legislature pass laws when the people can't come to an agreement? That's not democratic. If the people can't agree, neither should their representatives agree and it's the duty of the executive to veto such legislative overreach.
The reason I know this is I made the same mistake in a comment on a similar story a few weeks ago!
> I think using AI tools to write production code is probably indicative of people who don't really know what they are doing.

People said the same to me for using Microsoft IntelliSense 20 years ago. AI tools for programming are absolutely the future.
What does anyone deserve?

I'd stop and talk to her, because I'd find it interesting.
You're talking like you think people come to HN to learn things rather than argue the toss over a moving goalpost.
I've been trying to break that particular habit, on the grounds that most of the purpose behind a turn signal is to indicate entry into a new lane rather than departure from the old one. Not sure what the law says about that, though.
Today chatGPT thought it was June 7th 2024 but today is June 9th 2024... like what huh WTH it could query my iPhone for that simple info
> Build delightful web apps quickly in Python

What makes them delightful?

The Steve-Jobs-ification of marketing copy continues unabated.
That said, I feel it should be left to the people in the district (Manhattan) that have to live with it day in and day out. It should be a direct vote and not some politician’s call.
I like your ideas and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
I agree this is more of a monitoring mistake, and little to do with chatgpt
I don't really care about them marketing their company, but, Jesus, seriously, that's how software is going to be written now. TBH, I'm not really sure if it's that much different from how it was, but it sounds just... fabulous.
I prefer the term "deference" for treating someone as an authority. But you're right; people do often say "respect" when they mean "deference".
If you're new to building things that involve washers, and she's happy to teach the nuances of different washer types... that's helpful and awesome!
Indeed, and presumably well before 1965, which is when Greater London was created. Most of the non-disambiguated High Streets will be in the Greater London boroughs (Bromley, Bexley etc.)

When I was a kid, Bromley was already a London borough. But we sure as heck didn't consider Orpington to be proper London! ;-)
You have perhaps read that some people in a few places are having troubles with housing or rent?
Looks superb. Congrats
I get the sense that you don't understand the purpose or design of chatgpt

No tool can do everything
A Conversation with Bruce Lindsay (2004)
The great thing about Shottr vs system screenshots is the annotations you can put up very quickly. E.g.

1. $hotkey for screenshot
3. Hit enter to edit
4. Press A to draw an arrow with the mouse
5. Cmd-c to dismiss the edit window and copy & paste wherever.

So it basically only takes as long as you take to click down an arrow with your mouse
> At least on Mars, you could potentially do mining. On Venus, you can't do anything really, because you'd have no access to the natural resources there. So what's the point?

Depends what you're trying to make. The atmosphere soup on Venus contains more interesting chemicals than the Martian surface, and there's a whole lot more energy going around to power whatever you're doing.

> The Moon is the only place that really makes any sense at this point. It's close, it probably has lava tubes, it has lots of natural resources for mining, it would be relatively easy to set up habitats and maybe do things like build low-g factories (could be many industrial applications there that we haven't thought of), and aside from being airless, the surface isn't going to kill you like Venus will.

IMO Phobos is actually the best option - most of those advantages apply, and being smaller makes it easier for spacecraft to go to or from.
Q: What do all of these places have in common?

Aden

Bahamas

Bermuda

Bombay

Gibraltar

Halifax

Hong Kong

Jamaica

Malta

Singapore

Suez

Trincomalee

A: They are all former coaling stations in the British Empire
> We just let it generate the code and everything seemed to work

Everyone using C++20 compilers: side-glancing monkey.
I read that a few weeks ago. Quiet good.

A similar subject is:

The 2020 Commission Report on the North Korean Nuclear Attacks Against the United States by Jeffrey Lewis

Note this explicitly features President Trump and various real-life politicians and portrays Trump negatively. So if you are a fan of his probably avoid.
I did get the gist. That doesn't require reading to the end.
does your bot respect robots.txt directives?

pray tell, what is your bot's user agent string, [so i can nicely block you from my web-properties.]
It's entirely possible she has mechanical engineering qualifications or aviation engineering certification, can machine washers and understands how and why all the variations are used much as, say, this person appears to: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40629075

People that deeply understand particular subjects are valuable when those subjects are key to things that make the world work, they both keep things going for now and educate others to do the same in the future.
Very fascinating how close their style comes to that of the Fremont culture, thousands of miles and another continent away.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5e/Southern...

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/41/Petrogly...
Clearer video of the accident, from one of the comments on the article:

https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/video/9.6417666
I still think you're adding some nuance that isn't in the article.

The article is about how politicking is a requirement of success in academia. Schmoozing isn't social grace. It's closer to social engineering.

Social grace is having the grace to socialize without embarrassing yourself, you don't have to schmooze to do that. And yet it is often a requirement of politics.

Which is a requirement of success in academia.

Schmoozing is antithetical to science because science is the pursuit of the truth of the nature of things backed by tangible evidence. Science isn't supposed to show bias or favoritism.

Kind of hard to reject that notion. Though you could probably argue that schmoozing isn't necessary for politics. Most people would disagree though.
I used a Mac for about 10 years before finding Keyboard Maestro. I now think of those as the Dark Times.

Want to script actions in an app that isn't easily scriptable? It's got your back.
> "doesn't this also impact cab prices?"

Not directly, because most London taxis and Ubers are electric and thus exempt from the congestion charge. This exemption will end by 2026, but even then we're talking about £15 spread between many fares over the day.
But not the now, quite obviously.

Colour me cynical but I don't feel like pretending the future is here only to have to have to fix its blind incompetence.
They only care about sales from consumers they can lock-in and control.
There's another side to this where one attempts to take the pragmatic or business value view (it' seems so obvious to) and is met with ostracism by those that are entrenched in a specific technology.
Strongbox seems similar to 1Password. I’m considering both. Could you share some of the reasons that had you choose the former?
>No one owns that at a cognitive level

Notwithstanding the fact that compilers did not fall out of the sky and very much have people that own them at the cognitive level, I think this is still a different situation.

With a compiler you can expect a more or less one to one translation between source code and the operation of the resulting binary with some optimizations. When some compiler optimization causes undesired behavior, this too is a very difficult problem to solve.

Intentionally 10xing this type of problem by introducing a fuzzy translation between human language and source code then 1000xing it by repeating it all over the codebase just seems like a bad decision.
Not even sure these guys fit the standard mantle of language hyping charlatans. Most of the catastrophic choices were things you could do in any language. With the bonus of no meaningful comments and just committing to master so there's no PR comment history to help the future team's archeology project.
Like many recipients of a free tertiary education in the 1970s and early 1980s before the Australian insanity was imported to the UK, (the UK fee model was based on the Australian model AFAIK) I find myself in a strange place: I think it was better when it was free, but I also think it was better when less people went to university.

Australian universities bring about $17b of revenue into the country selling degrees to overseas students. It's an amazingly successful model but one which has probably broken the value chain between institute and student, by commercialising it. Its a factory. And it's hard to fail fee paying students.

The prior model was called the Colombo plan, and was a conscious political interventionist approach to building social capital in emerging economies, by training professionals to go back home and "love australia" -And I know some who did, and do. Like a lot of things, you can't buy this outcome. People sold degrees win individually, but their home economy usually suffers except from remittance money. People gifted degrees and sent home become senior civil servants, leaders in their home economy, and informally value Australia far higher than just a cash cow.

We did better overall training the doctors and mechanical engineers for free and making them go home, except of course the new elites sometimes became targets for abuse in the independence struggles.
> The damage isn't the same because car/car has twice the crumple zone. More of the energy will be dissipated through elastic deformation, so the deceleration will be slightly gentler.

Is it though? Genuinely wondering if I'm missing something in my ponderings...

I would assume that a collision between two identical cars traveling at the same velocity would each decelerate to zero within the distance of one crumple zone. ie due to the other one also decelerating the same way. Assuming that they don't end up in some sort of intermingled mashup (spherical cows and all that) which is maybe what you're describing?

And that a car at the same speed hitting a practically immovable object would also decelerate the same amount in the same single crumple zone distance.

Anyway as an irrelevant aside, hitting a brick wall isn't the same as hitting an immovable object - a car will mostly go right through a fairly standard unreinforced brick wall. Which unless a brick coming through the windscreen hits you directly, is probably going to be a lot safer than the deceleration of hitting an oncoming car or immovable object.
Shhhhhh ... you are ruining the illusion.
Tired of password manager apps, I started to keep my passwords in a locked note in the Notes app

With a simple cipher it's near impossible for anyone to use but you
Or give them a hoe-tastic flirty voice like google's ads and really confuse some human loins.

I can't wait for code reviews to include how it wants to stroke the right syntax out of me
I think the Swiss have a system like this. Referendums galore
Yes, but usually they run on very old kernels, with many of the drivers patched out of tree instead of being upstreamed. Because of that many system components(firmware, bootloader, etc) are either old, unmaintained, buggy, or affected by lots of CVEs.

This new SOC, has Qualcomm's commitment to be using the latest kernel - 6.9 and to have better support. We'll see what this means for the future, but it looks better already.
The link to "Can’t find the answer you’re looking for? Reach out to our customer support team." just takes me to the top of the page.

And I have to sign in to see the Privacy Policy or the Terms of Service?
They even said they had sentry set up.. they'd notice the duplicate key error immediately.
Hrm...

"Application error: a server-side exception has occurred (see the server logs for more information).
Digest: 2269195897"

That was during sign up.
Just because they fully developed doesn’t mean the argument they are presenting isn’t logical. It might not be, and that might be because they aren’t fully developed, but you would never know. You must treat every argument you hear as if were generated in good faith. Saying that you can’t rely on them to understand their own shortcomings in their own logic is inconsistent with the idea of logical debate in the first place. How would one ever know the difference between someone who is not convincible vs a non convincing argument. And the idea that young people should just adhere to values is not only inconsistent with the idea that the elders are more logical, since that is merely an appeal to authority, but also won’t be an argument that a young person will listen to, since in your own words, they are irrational.
The goal of SiteProfile is not to scrape data. It only accesses publicly available web pages, such as the homepage, about page, and pricing page. It does not access non-public content on websites, nor does it offer users the functionality to scrape website data.
Scrivener is great.
This. I'm glad the current implementation has been cancelled solely because New Jersey, the neighboring state that will see a massive impact on their transit and infrastructure due to this wasn't going to see a single cent.
What do you think the following does?

type Data struct {
Moon string `json:"m"`
Sun string `jsn:"s"`
}

func main() {
var d Data
err := json.Unmarshal([]byte(`{"m": "m1", "M": "m2", "Moon": "m3", "s": "s1"}`), &d)
fmt.Printf("err=%v, data=%+v\n", err, d)
}

The answer is "Moon:m2 Sun:"

In list form:

1. Specifying unmarshaling shapes isn't checked by the compiler at all, typoing `json:"s"` as `jsn:"s"` should be a compiler error in any sane statically typed language, but in go, struct tags are untyped strings, it does not help you.

2. There are hidden unchangeable unmarsheling rules, like the fact that Moon=m2 is because unmarshaling is case insensitive, even when you specify an exact key name.

3. It's very slow, due to reflection.

4. The API also is not really type safe, things like `json.Unmarshal([]byte, d)` return an error, but should instead not compile because that's a type-error (non-pointer passed to function that requires a pointer).

5. It's slow. It requires a lot of allocation.

6. `json.RawMessage` is subtle and difficult to use

7. It can't stream, so it's very easy to open yourself up to DoS, or to run across json documents `encoding/json` simply cannot handle

I can't think of any other supposedly statically typed language, other than C, where the most commonly used json library integrates so poorly with the language's type system.

Rust's `serde` is what a good well-typed json library looks like.
Your statement doesn't answer their question.
cmd-shift-5 lets you choose between all the screen capture options, plus it also allows you to do screen recordings.
Nice work! It would be cool if you would make a schematic PDF available, the KiCad 7 import of your Eagle files doesn't give a very readable result.

How did you choose the image sensor? Why an ON AR0330, and not OmniVision?

Nice choice to use an MSP430, this is a good application for using FRAM. But why use an ICE40 and an STM32 together? Why not use an STM32 with a DCMI peripheral?
I made a bug like this once where a database default was set to a value evaluated at runtime instead of on every insert. Oops

However, luckily in my case, it was caught immediately in the staging env since collisions caused exceptions.

Realizing when an expression is evaluated is pretty easy to miss. That code is probably live somewhere else right now surreptitiously causing issues.
> Rooftop solar can't be economically efficient without subsidies of some sort. How could it outcompete the economies of scale of putting an extra 10 panels in a utility-scale installation 50 miles away?

By not using expensive land (since it's on top of a building that existed anyways).
I like your suggestions. I haven't looked at this tutorial in awhile but I have an occasion to do so coming up, so I'll keep your feedback in mind for a revision.