skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's really interesting that the original author compares it to Lua. I've never heard that comparison, but I've been recently considering building a similar build system. Mimicking starlark files would be easy: all you would have to do is use Lua's load[1] method with a highly constraint environment and you would have the deterministic environment that starlark has (you would have to inject deterministic iteration functions and importing/etc obviously).

[1]: https://lua.org/manual/5.4/manual.html#pdf-load
What a massive achievement. What a time to be alive.
Why it's not immoral? can you elaborate?
Like when they faked the first Tesla self driving video, or when Musk boasted in 2017 (!!!) that they can drive the Semi in convoys so that it beats rail ("This is something we can do RIGHT NOW!"). Robotaxis that make the car appreciate, and not depreciate... etc. These are lies, but perhaps more importantly, should be considered fraud. To this day I don't understand how Musk can get away with all this... but hey, it's not my money (I'm not a US taxpayer).
Show HN: Scheme Made Easy
In past few weeks, I wrote several chapters to learn Scheme, a programming language of the Lisp dialect. The writing is not final as many chapters are missing. I wrote this because I wanted to improve my Scheme knowledge and increase the (low) number of Scheme literature.

The writing is inspired by Calculus Made Easy, which I learned about here on HN. This is why I'm sharing it here. But keep in mind that my writing style is not as good as that in the above-mentioned inspiration.

Feedback is very much appreciated.
Not just immigrants.

The same effect can be measured with Sports Fans from rival cities.

just wearing a rival teams colors can cause you to be the 'out group'.

And of course political groups.
Currently there is a hard limit on how many properties per year can be built due to lack of construction workers + training positions for new workers + being sure of work in the next decade(s) due to economic cycles.

Since the factor limiting supply is not cost or demand, prices keep ever-increasing with no gains for society; just filling the coffers of the haves.

You should really watch out with insults of economic illiteracy :)
“All the findings were replicated” is a claim by the accused, which is disputed by the researcher who originally found the issues, and he detailed all the contradicting claims right in that thread https://pubpeer.com/publications/8FF7E6996524B73ACB4A9EF5C0A.... Image alteration “that might have been made for editorial purposes” is a laughable euphemism for fraud, even the accused didn’t dare to use that phrasing. Not sure what’s in it for you to seriously misrepresent scientific fraud.
> how does threading work?

Basic answer: there is no threading, at least not for the user.

The build system runs a thread per BUILD file (in bazel). Since the BUILD files are written in starlark and starlark has no threads -- there is no problem.
Hard to land if no land.
yeah one out on the way up and on the way down, that has to be very frustrating. It makes my issues with trying to get a stupid website working correctly seem easier hah.
Contract lifecycle management (CLM) is the systematic management of contracts from inception through execution to renewal or termination. It encompasses several stages, including contract creation, negotiation, approval, execution, and ongoing oversight.

Read More- https://www.razorsign.com/what-is-contract-lifecycle-managem...
Error Flows in Go
Squatters doesn't make purposefully leaving houses vavent any less immoral.
Except in the opening question Adorno also dismisses radio music. This is just snobbish idiocy.

Clearly the only REAL way to experience music is in your private box at a grand symphony hall dressed in full evening wear.
Ask HN: How do you get people to care?
I am from Sudan. My country has been experiencing a horrific internal conflict for a little more than a year now, and it's only getting worse by the day. However, you can hardly hear about it in the news, on social media, or anywhere else.

Now, I am not naive. I understand that the exposure a problem gets is influenced by various political, economic, and social factors, the least of which is the number of people actually affected by the issue. So, what I am asking is: what are the most effective and realistic ways to get people to care without political power, fame, or wealth? How can an ordinary person make a difference?
I'd put Starship Soft Landing first. That's easy and safe-ish to try in a remote location. Vs. any little oopies on a Booster Catch could damage a load of high-value infrastructure.
Of course. I just expected them to fall at the same rate.
Max q is not orbital speed or height.

The max q, or maximum dynamic pressure, condition is the point when an aerospace vehicle's atmospheric flight reaches the maximum difference between the fluid dynamics total pressure and the ambient static pressure.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_q
Just adding the digits until you get to a single figure divisible by 3 weeds out many of them. 5+7=12, 1+2=3. You are permitted to omit the last step!

So 91 had me wondering for a while.
> Not as a compiler target. I doubt most projects exclusively use ORMs and never use SQL as a query language as intended.

If projects use 90% ORMs and 10% SQL, ORMs are still widely more popular. This exclusively you are trying to draw is nonsensical.

> Any SQL alternative needs to be something accountants can learn.

Try reading the thread next time. The entire discussion is about how SQL's biggest screw up is the lock-in. The better solution would clearly allow SQL to coexist. If accountants want to use SQL, there should be nothing holding them back. You can still write code in C too, if you want to. The existence of Rust didn't put an end to it, nor should it.

> Is it?

It is. You commonly see the problem as said earlier, but never deal with it, just leaving the bug there?

> This is how NoSQL solutions became popular; the solved a real problem

Indeed, they offered an alternative API which solved the real problem that is known as SQL – hence why the movement became known as NoSQL (i.e. literally "no SQL"). Unfortunately, most of the implementations that offered better APIs fell short in the actual database-y bits, souring the effort, which has ultimately also quashed any progress in improving the APIs over databases you can use.

> Any alternative to SQL has to have all the positive features of SQL and be a significant and obvious improvement.

Therein lies the problem here. Rust brings no significant and obvious improvement over C. It might be marginally easier to use, and might prevent a bug here or there, but in the end it doesn't do anything radically different from C. The same can be said of most SQL alternatives. Yet Rust "made it" regardless where the others haven't.

Of course, Rust had the power of marketing behind it. Being a Mozilla project originally, it had a built-in audience, and the flashy video they released extolling its virtues back in the early days won sufficient hearts and minds. Other than maybe Oracle who at least seems to be giving some minor effort, the big names are stuck on SQL.

Although credit to SQLite for recently documenting its bytecode format. While they have not committed to it being a stable API, and probably isn't suitable as an API in its current form, it does provide a framework in which to start considering a "WASM" for database engines. This will undoubtedly happen someday if we keep the pressure on the SQL crowd to change their ways. And, indeed, they are evolving. The "SQL is a fundamental mathematical property" claims have diminished greatly over time, and they are even starting to recognize that there have been alternatives, like QUEL. It's a slow road, but one that continues.

> I could build one of those tomorrow if I wanted.

And I'm sure it would be the greatest thing the world has ever known, but since nobody knows who you are, there is a fat chance of anyone ever coming to realize that it exits. It is not sufficient to just be significantly better.
If you get further down, they expand their view on Morality to be more nuanced, and something that sounds pretty reasonable. I think the core of their view is:

> My view is that morality is “real” in the same way that language is real. Both can change, but still operate within certain constraints. There are rules to every language, and rules to every morality.

> Saying morality isn’t real is like saying language isn’t real. And saying there is one true morality is like saying there is only one true language.

There's more to it than that, so it's worth reading that whole section if you want to give the author another chance.
If it allows for alternative design patterns that are simpler then I think it's a win in the end. For example pattern matching is great when writer parsers as an alternative to going the visitor pattern route.

Pattern matching has finally made it out of ML land and getting increasingly implemented in mainstream languages. I'm not sure if Rust is the main driver here, but I'm glad to see it.
You're saying that the "problem" is only for a cert class of people. People who bought their property lawfully and lawfully expect to make use of it when, if and how they desire. You seem to imply that they should not enjoy that right.
Yep, the outer ring is non-relightable and rely on the launch ring to light them. That said, part of the benefit of having so many engines is that you can tolerate a couple of failures. Similarly to how F9 is able to make orbit with an engine out. Still, agreed that they'll probably opt for one more water landing test first. Especially since the current license allows for multiple launches of this profile if the booster trajectory is fine.
Why is this post flagged? What is not scientific about this discussion?
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man." -- George Bernard Shaw (1903)
Browsing Log Streams with Fzf
There isn’t one, the author is dishonesty presenting a phenomenon demonstrated by an optics lab as the technology they hope it could in theory eventually lead to.
I'm at the "sign me up, worst case im officially disabled or dead" stage of Crohn's+celiac.

Not recognized as a disability by society (for aid/legal), not bad enough just to cut out the problem chunks of colon, but i still can't live a productive life. I'm so tired of struggling to keep the career that funds my treatment.

Work is all I barely have the energy for and the rest of the time is sleeping or cooking.

Somebody at some point has to be a test subject.
I'm gonna be driving along most of Loch Ness early this autumn. Anything in particular I should look out for with respect to the Great Glen Fault? Any less-obvious geologic features?
They did fall at the same rate, to very high precision. That booster was going like 2000 km/h! The delta is tiny, and likely down to the very low but non-zero aerodynamic accelerations that will differ between objects of different shapes and densities.
Browser Conference: a set of free, online talks about browser automation
Warning for humans! If you are trying to run a virtual PC on QEMY let's say on bare metal hosting from hetzner, you will very soon discover - QEMU is a dead slow without actual graphic card or at best you will get all kind of funky missing libs error messages on Ubuntu and other OS in very surprise spots.

Had a very good experience simulating K8s cluster with QEMU aka studing K8s hard way once I figure out how networking actually works between virtual machines and domains can be assigned with external proxy.
>what are other low trust societies

Look at the graph here on the wallet study, should give you an idea. China is a good example.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aau8712
oh interesting, i did not know that. Just before ignition there was a bottom up view of what looked like gaseous o2 pouring out, was that the priming? They do that to get the pumps spinning to get pressure to the pre-burners so they can ignite and then get more power to turbo pumps to bring everything up to full power correct?
The Browser Conference is running on June 20th, featuring companies such as Google, Selenium and Sauce Labs.

It's for anyone working with browser automation, whether it's e2e testing, web scraping or AI agents.

Talks include:

> Next Gen Protocols - Looking to the Future With WebDriver BiDi

> AI-Driven Testing - Using Advanced Tools to Accelerate Development

> AI Autonomous Agents and Browser Interactions

> Web Scraping Patterns and Anti-Patterns

You can register for free to attend the live streams or to access the replays.

https://www.browserconference.com/
Yeah keep in mind that both political parties heavily use private data farms to narrowcast campaign advertising. Facebook is just one of those. Basically there’s a private sector spying industry and the government enjoys the benefits too.

TikTok is messed up for many reasons. One being it’s a waste of everyone’s time. Two, foreign nations getting a treasure trove of video footage on a massive populace in the age of AI. This WILL lead to a faked mass-casualty event using real identities of people to cause political unrest. Just a matter of time—and data.

Going back to the article though, the social media baseline needs to be fixed as well. The OG Facebook platform was actually GOOD—lots of good-natured value in human connections. Then they started cutting in the bad shit reducing its purity.

TikTok took that to a whole new level and put in some home grown Singaporean crack. Ironically, the Chinese and Singapore have hefty penalty’s for drugs—and yet they thrust it onto the western sensibility. After all, it’s the WILD WEST.
> Gill encouraged others to invest in the stock—not based on the fundamentals of GameStop business but on his pure love for GameStop

This is incorrect as well. He had a ton of videos about the fundamentals.
Are any of these actually cathedrals? I see some monasteries and sacred sites, I don't see any cathedrals in that list. The difference is that 7 cathedrals, all named after St. Michael, found in a basically straight line would certainly not be a coincidence. It would be like there being 7 Google complexes in a straight line spread around the world: something's going on here. But 7 random religious sites named after one of the most famous saints is more like there being 7 Burger Kings in a basically straight line: much easier to believe as a coincidence.
Unless your job requires you to think or act physically, then yes, you are in danger
When I graduated grad school in the late 80s, almost no one I knew went to live in an urban core other than a fair number of NYC finance folks--and few of the non-finance jobs were in a city proper. Even the New Yorkers, almost everyone migrated out to suburbs over time. I think I knew maybe one couple who stayed in Manhattan.
There was an in-orbit relight in the IFT3 flight plan, which failed to happen. IFT4 is somewhat more conservative - just get to orbit (happened), pseudo-land the booster (happened), and get back out of orbit (remains to be seen).

The amount of disinformation that SpaceX and Musk create around failed tests is really annoying and honestly somewhat problematic. It would be nice if SpaceX could just honestly say "this worked and this didn't," but we have to pretend that everything is a miraculous success. After the engine failed on IFT3, the immediate line was "we planned it this way" and then days later "we reached orbital velocity." Launching rockets is impressive enough that you don't have to try to gaslight us all on the way there.

As far as I can tell, my scorecard has IFT1 and IFT3 as failures based on what the flight plans said going in, and IFT2 and (so far) IFT4 as successes.

Edit: I'm suspicious of the fact that they turned off the feed right after cutting the engines and some gas vented. Previous tests have had no problem showing a video feed at this phase.
I wonder if it has anything to do with the joke format, "that's a nice tie... not." which sets up the victim and then delivers a gut punch. Perhaps it has conditioned a skepticism towards ellipses.

I didn't interpret your comment as bad will, but I'm glad this opened an interesting conversation about language!
This looks interesting. Have you tried it? What are the limitations?
You might enjoy this book.

https://www.amazon.com/Principles-Electrodynamics-Dover-Book...
The AI hype is probably more recent though. Bitcoin is becoming mainstream.
Yes, it's misunderstood.

A lot of us were doing some form of agile before someone came up with the word agile.

I'll give you an example:

Imagine the process of creating a retro video game.
First, you might write a function that clears the screen.
Next, you'll get something simple drawn. Maybe just a simple block.
Then you write a function that allows you to move the block with a controller.
Then you swap the block with some sort of character animation.
Next, you'll write a routine to draw girders.
Then you'll implement gravity.
Etc., etc. You'll just keep iterating until you have a well-balanced and engaging game.

That's agile. You may have had a lot of the game designed beforehand, or none. In fact, you could even create the game design documents with the same method. Make a quick first draft, get feedback, make adjustments, and repeat. And then keep going back to it whenever you notice something doesn't work or some better idea comes along during the course of development.

Originally, agile had nothing to do with rigid meeting schedules. Or "adapting to changes," or whichever buzzwords people like to throw around.
It annoyed me as soon as it appeared at the tail end of TLJ. I've wanted to visit it for a long time, but it's a bit of a hassle to get to. I can only imagine that it's even harder now that it's a pilgrimage site for Star Wars fans, and not just rock-botherers like myself.
They did the exact opposite of rally. USB-C on iPhone took an extra eight years. Even if I agree it was a "certainty", that's far too long.

They did not want to standardize. The idea of forcing them didn't come up in any significant way until after they proved that.

And I don't know what their laziness about USB 3 is supposed to prove. They didn't consider 3 support necessary for USB-C either.
Correct, but the time and velocity when you reach max Q (and the flight plan CSV) indicate something about your path to orbit. I was extrapolating from previous starship tests.
Direct air capture technology to scale up to megaton capacity
It does seem like they could do with a more isolated launch site (with the tank farm in a huge concrete bunker) before trying to catch Super Heavy
> This is called a pump and dump scam

It isn’t a pump and dump if he isn’t lying about it to pump it up (talking about your own actual position or the fundamentals isn’t “pumping”) and if he isn’t dumping it (“diamond hands” is sort of his thing)
While interesting, this would almost be more interesting if it was discussing some of the other applications I a think of, such as photovoltaic cells. By converting IR light to visible light, they should be able to improve the efficiency of silicon-based PV cells.

Another application I can think of would be for greenhouses. By converting IR light to visible light, you can increase the amount of useful light for plants (and animals), increasing the photosynthesis (PAR) and plant growth. Mars comes to mind. Surely there would need to be a lot of refinement, but if it can increase useable light 2x, assuming the usable light increase occurs mostly 2 hours before dawn and 2 hours after dusk and dawn, and 2 hours after, for a 12 hour day, that's a 33% boost in efficiency. Half that to be conservative and ~15% is no joke, either
That's weird, because the repository states Apache 2.0.
https://github.com/THUDM/GLM-4/blob/main/LICENSE

Oops, you are right. The code is Apache 2.0, license for the model weights is separate.
And this man claims to speak for the proletariat...
> This doesn't look anything like a Big Mac

> What differentiates the Big Mac from other double cheeseburgers and gives it its unique taste

You said it doesn't _look_ the same, then you mention taste.
Similar to ship, they start up more engines than needed in case a few fail, then immediately shut down the extra engines.
You know, it occurs to me that musical instruments have blank actuators (keys, fingerboards, valves, ...); yet that alone doesn't prevent music learners from staring at their hands while playing, and that's a habit that can persist for years or decades even.

People learning typing on computers should be encouraged to keep their eyes where their typing appears on the screen.
You've diagnosed the issue then recommended leaches and bleeding.

'Market mechanisms' already exist - no company is precluded from doing research. We can discuss the deficit in research investment that short termist 'market mechanisms' have led to in contemporary corporations, but its absurd to claim that the market can or should replace academic research.

It's pretty clear that in practice the 'publish or perish' academic culture fostered by the financialisation of the university, the rise of the adjunct and the death of tenure have contributed heavily to the falsification of research. In practice encouraging replication, self directed research and significantly more 'pure' 'blue sky' research than governments and universities are inclined to do, would significantly alleviate this problem.

Academia needs far less exposure to 'market mechanisms'. They're perverse incentives for good science.
Alright, I suppose it's not as simple to formulate the question accurately and correctly.
IIRC they were all part of the same Pangaian range, and include Greenland east coast and the Atlas mountains.
Well, either way: than the 'living body of law' theory is an example of such a 'spirit'.
Also, allow the map projection to vary, to produce lines of different curvatures.
From a holistic point of view new developers often bemoan Java being too large and complex to learn, which is the opposite of what it used to be (I started at JDK 1.0 in 1995).

Little changes here and there are eroding a core value of the language imho, and those devs choose different easier languages to start with. Without new blood languages die.

I am surprised Brian Goetz endorsed this (I've got his older Java book Concurrency in Practice) so can only assume there's a larger picture I don't see.

As stated, I believe Java is "jumping the shark" when it should be making breaking changes (not just huge deprecations). Also I'm not sure why my parent comment has been downvoted for a unpopular view, it's a genuine concern and why I now prefer to use other simpler languages instead when not in a work context.
All maps on paper are flat. There are multiple projections into 2d map.

There is no reason to assume that the lines align in other projections.
Honest question, did they sink the remaining fuel? Or did they just burnt all remaining fuel whilst hovering? I would imagine that's pretty toxic.

Edit: Thanks for the answers!
Every job that does not require a brain will have <..>
I wonder how many would-be Columbuses were before him and failed.
Why does your software keep failing during development? Don't you have the knowledge to make it work?

It's the old, non-iterative everything-up-front method to rocket development that's weird. At least as a developer it seems obvious that a more hardware-rich approach with a high iteration rate will lead to a better outcome in the end, _especially_ when you're trying to push hard on the technological boundaries.