skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Do you have any suggestions for a good one?
Thanks for your feedback.

> as a file that can be version controlled

PlayBooks are created using a UI and all state changes are tracked but we currently don't support moving back to a previous version of the PlayBook.

> where multiple people can be viewing/working on it at the same time

This is currently picked wherein we will be creating sessions for each time PlayBooks are run and sessions will have the data persistent in each cell for everyone with the link to see.
Eternos Wants to Help You, or at Least an AI Replica, Live Forever
The point is the statementay or may not be accurate. From a journalistic perspective, unless Cox provided evidence or the author was able to otherwise independently verify the claim, it's a claim, not a fact. The comment is a good suggestion.
Nah, no thanks. This is a losing battle. The "better" you are at email and the more responsive you are, the more email you'll get. Each prompt response sets a precedent, signaling your availability and encouraging more frequent communication. As your efficiency increases, so does the expectation for promptness, leading to an ever-growing volume of emails. Just opt out of staying on top of email and similar things.
With the caveat that you significantly change the distribution of the output. Picking on JSON with current-gen LLMs, consider

(1) Retry till the output passes the grammar

(2) Only generate tokens passing the grammar

Assuming (2) actually runs (not guaranteed for all grammars and distributions theoretically, basically never a problem in practice), one of many common failure modes is forcing the generation of grammar-valid tokens after an error has been made.

E.g., one sort of "truncation" error happens when the LLM is producing an object with metadata around a transcription (e.g., an author, timestamp, and blob of text). A common incorrect result looks like

{"author": "John Doe", "timestamp": "20:23:58", "transcript": "My name is John Doe, and ...

Those ellipses weren't just cutting off my description of the invalid data. The model will produce ellipses after the string carries on for too long. If you greedily produce tokens adhering to a grammar, your only options at that point are continuing the string and ending it, and both options are very wrong.

Contrast that with option (1). Empirically, if the model is willing to actually produce those tokens rather than cut off its answer, it's much more likely to be correct (i.e., the presence of that ellipses bug will tend to cut off the entire response, not just truncating the string and still generating a valid object). If you just retry till the model succeeds then you have a substantially higher accuracy in that task.

That particular example may or may not apply to your favorite problem and favorite model, but it highlights the problem that constraining to a grammar forces a large skew in your result distribution. A large part of the power of an LLM is its autoregressiveness, and other sampling algorithms only tend to perform well when there's some outside knowledge relevant to the real-world problem being solved (e.g., if the LLM has >50% accuracy on a task with a small, finite number of outputs, then you might want to drop the temperature to 0 and just sample repeatedly, selecting the most likely option), but messing with the result distribution without a rationale for why you're still likely to get good results is risky.
this is quite interesting. I'll surely keep it in mind while we build out deeper collaborative features.!
The fact that people like you exist is far more damaging for the world than phone thieves.
generative AI photos are the headline photos for like 60% of 'Google feed' type news these days.

Did 'enterprise blockchain' ever change the real world in any ways noticeable to the laymen outside of the industry?
> The physical pain and struggle that you endure during vaccination is very real (you fight the spike protein fragment) versus a relatively weak virus now.

If you think of vaccination as meaningful pain and struggle I can wonder how you rate actual illness. Compared to the vaccine, I’d rate Influenza at about 3 orders of magnitude worse.

> Calling it a guaranteed benefit is odd.

The odds of avoiding it for 40+ years is quite low when it hits ~10% of the population each year. So balancing getting the shot every year for the rest of your life vs several effectively guaranteed infections is an obvious benefit. I mean sure you could die tomorrow, but assuming an early death is hardly a winning strategy for life.
> That's a pretty weird way for a site admin to handle karma

No, it's a very normal and fair thing for an admin to realize that two users submitted the same story within a few hours of each other, and the later one just happened to pick up votes, when it would have been reasonable for the first one to take off instead, and redirect the newer submission's comments to the older one.

> Why would you funnel karma and classify it as such?

What even is "funneling karma"? And regardless, I think you're confused, because the person who redirected the comments, as you pointed out, is an admin, so there's very little need for any malicious trickery, and he explicitly described what he was doing for transparency.

> Does that mean it's okay to farm karma here since it's basically Reddit karma?

Nobody suggested that except you. It looks like you're seeking an excuse to either unfairly accuse dang of something he didn't do, or to break the rules/do Reddit things on HN. Please don't.
Natural keys are (quite literally) essential to defining entities. Quine had a great slogan for this: "No entity without identity!" Natural keys are how you determine the identity of an object, which is to say, if you have two different referring expressions, how can you tell whether they are referring to the same object, or different objects?

Suppose you take the advice of this article, and use, say, social security numbers to identify people. (Let's ignore the fact that this only works for the U.S.) Suppose one fine day, somebody tries to enter in a record about a new person--but some typo has happened somewhere, and the new person's SSN clashes with somebody's SSN who is already in the system.

Sure, the database will notify you that something went wrong. But how do you know which social security number is correct, and which is incorrect? You will have to find a set of fields which uniquely identifies each person ANYWAYS. I.e. you'll have to differentiate them by name, birthday, place of birth, etc etc.

Now even worse!!! What if somebody attempts to add the same person TWICE to your database, but mistypes their social security number. Now your database can't even tell you that something has gone wrong. It will happily record duplicate or contradictory information about the same person--and in order to resolve the mess, again, you have to find out what uniquely identifies the people ANYWAYS.

Now, even worser than worse--what if you have taken the advice of this article, and you haven't bothered to identify a set of fields which are genuinely unique to each person. You just have a social security number and a name. How are you going to even going to correct the fact that John Smith is in your system twice, when you have ten John Smiths? How can you possibly tell which two John Smiths are the same John Smith?

Yeah, it take some time and careful thinking to properly come up with natural keys for your entities. But unless you do, you haven't actually specified your entities at all. This is one area where long years of experience really pay off. Expert data modelers spend years and decades honing their craft, observing the work of others, etc etc. Eventually they acquire the wisdom needed to be able to know what kind of information is really needed to nail down what kind of entity the database needs to know about.
Show HN: Coolection – A better way to organize your favorite links. Open Source
If you are coworkers and your office uses Slack then you're just being a dick. This is one of those cultural norm things that would be normal if it was the Discord of an OSS project -- hey we don't do support here, email project@dev.omg.lol but rude in an office.

If you don't like the office norm of Slack and wish it was email then too bad, same if it was the other way around too. It's now your problem to bridge Slack->email or email->Slack.
> Parser and lexer for reversible parsing with guaranteed reversibility. Seems to be totally unique across all programming languages. Of course, CFG-based.

There's also the parser combinator approach of parser-printers ;)
> Something to consider: when you remove the female body from the definition of woman, what else remains besides sexist feminine stereotypes?

Any definition of woman that includes all cis women must include all trans women, or will otherwise include trans men.

Fertility? Many women are infertile.

Chromosomes? There is at least one genetic line of women in the world where they were all identified at birth as women and have each given birth, but have XY chromosomes. Anecdotally, many universities have had to stop genetics students from testing themselves for their chromosomes as a fun thing to do on the weekend, because the incident rate of chirality is MUCH higher than you would otherwise expect.

Any other such metrics either end up becoming pure phrenology or excluding massive amounts (millions) of women.

Moreover, trans women do not "identify with female stereotypes" and they are often most often strongly aligned with cis women who break stereotypes, cis women who are also largely targeted by the bathroom bills you are in favour of. The science says that being transgender isn't purely social and cannot be fixed through therapy, please avail yourself of the cult[0] that you are a part of.

Thank you for your time.

[0]: https://beaudyess.medium.com/
The problem isn’t about getting the perfect answer, it’s about observing the process, and conversing about the answer afterwards. I’d be fine hiring the candidate who whiffs the shuffle but knows about Fisher-Yeats and says they’d look for a well-tested implementation and drop it in. I mean that can’t be their answer to everything, but evidence of real experience should grant a Mulligan now and then. Coding interviews cannot be code themselves.
If you're talking about Dumb Money then I'm sorry that's just a bad movie. There's no 'rigged game' there's no 'heroic retail vs Big Bad Wall Street', and the vast majority of individuals who FOMOed in lost money and/or were left with heavy bags.

And to top everything off it could potentially (maybe already has) create a whole bunch of suckers who repeatedly get fleeced because they believe in conspiracy theories instead of repeated explanations of how the market works.
The problem with these conversations is that there are many AI experts with different opinions. Hinton is Ilya Sutskever’s PhD professor so I can’t say I’m too surprised he’s concerned about AI safety. I’ll be honest, I really don’t think it’s a conversation worth having. AI will progress regardless of attempts to slow it down. I’m not even necessarily one of those people that thinks all technological growth is good. I just think it’s inevitable.
I think there's a reasonable argument that cohere might not capture the value and it might all go to the big players. But I can't understand how anyone still has the view llms themselves are not valuable.
Perhaps a better example would be a fingerprint or a retinal scan instead of social security numbers as natural keys for a person.
This all sounds great until you’re physically unable to work your system for an extended period of time (vacation out of cell range, illness, hospitalization, etc.). Then the pristine castle of information routing is buried under a pile of inputs and the only way out is inbox bankruptcy. If it’s important they’ll mention it again.
Or maybe they don't all have a good reason but you don't really have a choice about running them (e.g., on your work computer).

If you are visually impaired, you also likely have greatly reduced space for those icons, especially when undocked. (This issue plagues me personally.) In that case, this is not merely a clutter issue: app icons will simply be truncated from the menu bar, and in some cases that may mean that some functionality is just totally inaccessible to you.
Indeed. I'm much more worried about partially deleted files in `/tmp` than the fact that files in `/tmp` do eventually get deleted.
And.. we circle back to Grothendieck..

Once you defn your equivalence classes, the partition fn, entropy, free energy etc is straightforward.

Glad you caught on to the agronomic metagame. (Grassmann sadly a falsefriend, but agroSME maybe)

Poem is close, but needs more oscillatory components (2D) -- heat to feed into elite need, eg.

Microdose that homebrawn(/nighstilled) Roeteli into the gentle noon?
1. was about a different flaw in your argument, not 6 above. That one is also wrong, see X levels above re video calls which you don't need to explicitly delete for them to disappear from malware's view without Recall

2 addresses above, including Ctrl+C, so you need something new to address it
Yes, we also support webhook based triggers so investigations can get initiated even before the SRE is on the laptop and by the time they reach there, they receive a summary upfront.
The AI Blackout: A Traffic Chaos Story
Ideally, you should aim to sanitize/normalize strings on the write side rather than resanitizing on every read.
I find myself grateful I can support my family financially, as it's statistically unlikely my art can ever permit me to quit my day job.

Not to imply that it's in any way a quality peculiar to those who write poetry in their free time (I know it isn't), but my need for creative expression regularly seeps into the coding standards to which I hold myself, insofar as I demand a certain beauty-- such as such a thing is ever even possible-- out of the libraries I write.
Where do I report a Franchise Tax Board anomaly?
The lyrics explains it all
It tells me everything I needed to know that it was 2 full circles. At least better than 4pi does. "We" all agree that 1 circle is 360° so 2 circles would be 720°. It's really not difficult.

People living in the worlds of maths forget the rest of the world is not a place of absolutes. There are so many way of looking at things and labeling things. Yet, maths people look at normies like they're stupid for not seeing it their way and make argumentative statements like degrees are useless and anyone using them are silly.
Which only reenforces the point that using what is exposed as the ID is not safe as a natural key.
In my (limited) experience private one on one messages are not censored. Or at least this was the case several years back... It's possible things are more strict now.

At least in my tests on Wechat you could discuss tiannanmen square or whatever you want with individuals. Some stickers were censored on Wechat and wouldn't show up. I think images as well may be don't get delivered.

Virtually all censorship and cases of people being arrested are when people talk about these things in large group chats (if a group chat has more than X amount of people it needs to be "registered"). My impression was it's a government fear of things going viral and controlling the public sphere and not about creating a panopticon/state-terrorism

Again.. This might be out of date, but this was at least the case for a long long time.
Panel advising US FDA rejects MDMA for post-traumatic stress disorder
>or will otherwise include trans men.

correctly so.
> How do you handle this in your practice?

Create a normal user, make them a sudoer, and then log back in as the other account.
They're probably responsible for a non-zero proportion of the price increase, but the bulk is driven by supply and demand.
Become a life long avid reader. Asking people online is fine; but there is nothing better than educating yourself by reading the world's most recommended books.
A bit lower in the article he says:

> If someone sends me a chat that isn’t time sensitive, I redirect them to email

Also, to parent and siblings: does it change your mind if you factor in that the author is CTO at Meta? Not in a simpering "ooh he's so important" way, in a practical "he gets a lot of communication and having a system helps" way.
You just cited the report that the poster above you referenced as cherry-picked, which is rather amusing!

Regardless, and it's anecdata -- but everyone I know who is working in the fields of medicine on the subjects the cass review covers, have pointed out numerous critical flaws in it that undermine every single point it makes. It's actually somewhat worse than if you got a PDF paper from Natural News dot com, a site that I discovered in the mid 2010s was rehosting and editing medical papers to say whatever they wanted.
Never heard of that theory either. Enjoy the movie, it’s a good one.
People don't see self-replicating machine elves if they have no idea who Terence McKenna is.

Ultimately, these are easily programmed experiences by people good at creating mythology. The more pseudoscientific one makes the mythology the better too of course or at least some loose connection to pseudoscience.

If we just say elves then it is obviously ridiculous. Self-replicating machines sounds STEM enough.

That was McKenna's brilliant con-artistry. Painting a STEM varnish on centuries old bullshit that no one would have bothered reading about otherwise.
You could make the same argument for any tool that does not provide high security. In fact security is layered, and no single tool should be relied upon to be your one security tool. You said as much yourself: "I see this as a last line of defense," but I don't see how you conclude that this would inherently cause people to be more reckless with secrets.
SQL, C, Javascript: the three kings of "good enough".

Bad enough that their flaws are evident even to novice practitioners.

Good enough, entrenched enough, that they will be around for the next 50 years too.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MSX

It is a 1980 Japanese standard for home computers based on the Z80.
Yes, that combination to cycle between windows of an app never gives me any trouble. It's when cycling between different apps (cmd + tab) that I run into issues.
Great observation. That's why I think rules and structures should be kept simple and minimal. The economy isn't supposed to be a game because people's lives are at stake. Social media algorithms are now an integral part of the economy so their complexity and obscurity poses a significant problem.
So, I agree with your take as a reaction to this article specifically.

However, I also think that there is a legitimate point here. Which is that parser combinators, even in languages like Haskell, are shockingly tricky to use correctly. In particular, they violate the usual Haskell principle that "if it compiles, then it will probably run correctly". Having written multiple parsers in multiple languages with multiple parsing frameworks (including direct recursive descent), using Parsec in Haskell was the only time I had to write a test suite for the parser specifically. And that's because there were so many footguns that I was repeatedly making mistakes despite the fact that this was a port of a parser I'd already written (and therefore, ought to know backward and forward). (For the record, this was not my first Haskell project either, which is why I was so shocked it went so poorly.)

I'm sure it's possible to make mistakes in CFGs too, but practically speaking I can't remember running into that situation myself. Whereas with Parsec I ran into it repeatedly.
Do you know details about the norms at Meta, where the author is the CTO?
You're reading this wrong. The real ID (the Snowflake) is exposed in the API, and the UI if you turn dev tools on. That's the one I use. You don't use @username#1209 but 1247755691426542433.
Every organism is alive only in a certain medium. Viruses "come alive" in a host, e.g. a human body, or in solution. Humans are live only in Earth's environment. There is no life without the context of the broader environment that it can live in.
Yes but any kind of bug could later introduce tainted values. A foreign key contstraint might save you, but not always.
This sounds like it should probably be a workflow instead. Modelling the intent here is actually important.
Looks nice. I don't really have any use for the extra features though, AltTab does what I wanted and is free.
Just a sign-in button with no info? Offers on-prem with no link? Hard pass. Also, I think Superhuman is someone else's trademark.
most backup programs run with root or at the targets own user.
There is the possibility to circumvent the permission checks: capabilities.
the provide parts of the root user to unprivileged processes, in your case CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH should be enough for the backup process itself. for restore it would need a bumch of caps set, like CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE, CAP_CHOWN and maybe more
It quickly becomes the Service Animal problem. When no one can or is allowed to verify your infosec credentials, everyone becomes a three star infosec General with a simple purchase from Amazon/Alibaba.
The reality however is that many applications find a recursive descent parser easier to handle once the grammar has been fixed (and in spite of its many caveats!), so PEG is a natural formalism for them.

For example I once tried to write a full parser for Lua in LALRPOP and gave up after a week because it was too slow to compile and too hard to avoid conflicts; I ended up writing a recursive descent parser in a single day. I already knew that LALRPOP doesn't resolve shift-reduce conflicts and also how to transform the grammar to avoid them, but that wasn't enough for me.

I think there is a niche for CFG-like formalisms with bounded PEG-like constructs so that it can be quickly adjusted without giving up all the benefits of CFG. I have been already in situations where I really want to have such formalisms for multiple times, including the aforementioned one.
He is entitled to a refund but not compensation. What you linked applies to compensation beyond a refund which you are right he is not entitled to but he never claimed he was.

> If the situation is within the airline's control, but required for safety purposes

> Airlines' obligations to you include:

> standards of treatment; and

> completion of your itinerary or a refund.

https://rppa-appr.ca/eng/obligations-and-level-control
This looks similar to my project https://github.com/ClickHouse/adsb.exposed/, which allows us to analyze this data in real-time and is much simpler and elegant.
People have been buying ineffective ads since the invention of ads
I wonder how many of the "flaws" were deliberate, carefully put there by those who are against DRM on principle.
In the dynamic world of web development, security remains a paramount concern. Ensuring that users securely access the right resources and data is non-negotiable. Building upon our previous exploration of authentication with Azure Active Directory (AAD) in a Blazor WebAssembly app, we now delve into another crucial aspect: enabling authentication using external providers, explicitly focusing on Google authentication.

Google authentication offers a seamless and widely-used method for users to securely log in to apps using their Google accounts. Leveraging Google’s authentication services enhances your app’s security and provides users with a familiar and convenient authentication experience.
Those levels are absurd. The optimal level is the pre-industrial level of under 300 ppm which is what humans evolved under for millennia. The levels outdoors are closer to 500 now than to 400. Drowsiness starts at levels as low as 600-800.
This looks surprisingly similar to my project, https://github.com/ClickHouse/adsb.exposed/, but more complex and less performant.
Alan Watts reopened my interest in the metaphysical while deconstructing western mythology. Check out some of his lectures if you're interested in exploring the potential for reviving some of those positive experiences.