skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
By "making it available" it doesn't necessarily mean a fully-working, configured broker, but only having enough working primitives that you can bring up userspace without races, with requests that can immediately be accepted, even if not answered until a bit later. The stuff that we currently just cannot do with D-Bus, and that we have to reinvent protocols for.

> Binder predated both Bus1 and kdbus projects

It's not about when they started, it's about when they got merged/rejected. One got rejected because "ipc in kernel is bad", and some months later the other was merged because "ipc in kernel is good". One rule for thee...
Pollen particles are quite fragile and tend to break up into PM2.5 and smaller, especially during rain events. See for instance the reference below.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2022.100177
Who remembers the old Mad magazine comic strip Spy Vs. Spy? It seems like we are seeing more and more of this playing out in real life, with the US on North Korea and China on Japan/US. We are ramping up another Cold War-type era with threats and muscle flex.
Everytime I have to use std::get<> and std::visit<> I feel like the committee has failed all of us.
from my understanding, this will only be able to accelerate EBM (energy-based models) which they could scale up in simulation to show that they would be useful

EBMs as of now are not really that useful at all.
> think broadcast is treated very differently because of the limited number of frequencies

Source?

Section 310 of the Communications Act, which bars licenses from being “granted to or held by any foreign government or the representative thereof,” was written in 1934 [1]. The Foreign Agents Registration Act was passed in 1938 in response to (slash fear of) Nazi propaganda [2].

[1] https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/310

[2] https://perspectives.ushmm.org/collection/propaganda-and-the...
I too much prefer R to Python (it’s far more expressive, for one) however it’s clear now that Python has “won” in this space and R is a tough sell to a wider team.
The Path to Advanced Onshore Wind Technologies – Radia
I would guess java was chosen for its high quality libraries, efficient runtime and its static typing, which enables easy and safe refactoring.
It's well executed from a UX and Marketing point of view, but what it needs is some copy dedicated to security of files, privacy of files, why I (and my customers) should trust your system etc.
Oh yes. One is super.
> Driven by worries among U.S. lawmakers that China could access data on Americans or spy on them with the app,

There's an arguable national security angle. Potential surveillance, and, especially, manipulation and dumbing-down.

Earlier, I also heard complaints about TikTok implications for individual health. Which, when implying US Big Tech social media as an acceptable alternative, sounds like an abusive parent: "If anyone's going to beat up my kids, it'll be me!"

Sounds like US Big Tech might've decided on the complaint angle of "some other country could spy on people" -- since all the other valid complaints about TikTok, including intimate surveillance, also apply to TikTok's counterpart US Big Tech products.

Outlaw the irresponsible behaviors, not the competition.
1x channel for lamp brightness (likely pinned to "on" to provide constant power). 2x channels for pan (double fine). 2x channels for tilt. 1x channel for gobo rotation. 1x channel for gobo selection. 3x channels for standard color mix (RGB) are then sent to the modulator controlling the emitter. = 10x DMX channels per fixture. +1 maybe for focus depending on the style of fixture.

I'd bet good money that these things respond to standard DMX color codes. https://astera-led.com/wp-content/uploads/DMX-Values-for-com...

Want to hack the system? Look into whether they are using wireless DMX. Probably not, but if they are you might be able to take over the individual instruments. And I mean own them because such signals are never encrypted and the lamps won't be in a position to be rewired during the show.
I live in an EU country and I, in fact, cannot use online banking without a Google-enabled Android or an iPhone. There is exactly one bank that offers a desktop authenticator, but we had a really bad experience with them when we tried them for a year.
Starting to sound eerily like the first couple chapters of Ministry for the Future
I feel like this part has little to do with TCO and TFA is overly focused on the recusion part of things. Even in the case of that example, there's still a function that directly returns the result of another function call. That's a tail call and can be optimized the same way it could if it were recusion optimized to reuse the current stack frame.
Interesting that there is no cache (instead it's using a prefetch queue).. "Implement multi-cycle to reduce area / power", I guess it's not one-cycle per instruction, so maybe not needed.

Well, where is the superscalar variant? :-) At least on an FPGA, there would be very diminishing returns for doing it. Even bypassing has bad effects on fMAX.
Growth is slower this year vs last year but the growth is still happening...

How is that a failure? Slow sales are occurring across the entire auto industry probably because people are broke/unemployed and dont want to spend the cash right now.
I switched to my custom domain for email, it works great most of the time however I would recommend against any non-traditional TLDs (e.g. .com, .org, etc) or ccTLDs (.ca, .nz, etc).

I switched to one of the new fancy gTLDs and been having issues: 1) some companies don't accept it as a valid domain; or 2) on the phone they get confused and tried add something like gmail.com to it so you get email@gTLD@gmail.com
The premise of the plan is that evaluating output is easier than producing it, such that a human researcher could look at the AI researcher's output and tell if it's correct and trustworthy. If this is true, what else is there to figure out?
These superaligners.

"I am breaking out on my own! Together we will do bigger and better things!!!"

"Ok I'll join the other guys."

I think it's pretty clear that the capital markets have next door to no interest in alignment pursuits, and only the most-funded apply a token amount of investment towards it.
This still doesn't bring up Fennec if searched for 'browser'. Neo Store does.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_electrode_potential...

You must add the potentials for each half-reaction: iron oxidation and dioxygen reduction.
Yes, as you have just shown, there is a category of "preferred owners."
The clicks on the speech of the Orca's great prime minister Mr Alfredo Breamtits were misunderstood. What he said was: "eat the rich in fatty acids". Is a common problem when AI translates Killerwhalish.
That’s already included into the current ~3% numbers. So 5+% represents a much larger increase than just 67%.
Uh, it's not strange at all to expect a single cause when a system fails. Rather, there's often a chain of failure but with one thing at the head. You can look at how a car breaks down - you go from a single belt failing to a damage spread around.

Your list can be easily sorted this way (Notably, foreign nationals with money are just an instance of asset price inflation, in no way an instance of "nuance" or something).

I see the chain of causation thus - a flood of printed money has increased the value of all capital assets (some of that money appears as the money of foreigners and some of domestic investors, some as hedge funds, etc). Housing has been a focus and areas with restricted supply are where the money has been most attracted (it's spread more and more as the scale increases - a key point of the gp).
That's one of the reasons you'd put your best song on side A, song 1 and your 2nd best song on side B, song 1 - you got the most detail on the outside track. I remember seeing an interview with Led Zeppelin quite a few years back where they were claiming they knew they'd have a smash hit with Stairway to Heaven. Which was funny, because I remembered then seeing an interview several years before where they said it was a track they never thought was going to go anywhere.

Which is it? It's track position - 4th track on the A side, i.e. the last track, tells you how important they thought it was. Which is to say, it was a "throwaway" track that made it big. It happens.

The other odd thing about that album is "When the Levee Breaks" is considered to be the 2nd-most popular song off of the album and it too was the last track on the B side.

What this tells me is the album's producer, one Jimmy Page, was out of touch with what Led Zeppelin fans liked most. Based off the sound of the next album, Houses of the Holy, I'd say Mr. Page got the message loud and clear.
I am very slowly working on a non-profit community management / RSVP collection platform. Think of this as an alternative of the websites you tend to think of if you want to collect RSVPs for a social club or meetup group, but run and maintained by a Wikimedia Foundation-style non-profit.
I can just see those bare tires on the 101... And now people won't be stealing rims, they'll be stealing tires.
NixOS, digital archiving and curation
They knew what they were doing. It would be funny if it wasn't so common.
Im pretty sure everyone, "even here", applies double standards. It's human nature. You fail by your own criteria. Fwiw, I upvoted both generalizations, yours and waterlovers, but want to point out that not all generalizations are equal.
> since all the other valid complaints about TikTok, including intimate surveillance, also apply to TikTok's counterpart US Big Tech products

Big Tech aren’t Chinese. There is no public coalition civically engaged against Big Tech’s surveillance. There is a solid bloc concerned about China.

If you want to regulate surveillance capitalism—and I do—convince people to care about the issue (and call their electeds and vote).
OOP as used in R is very much a function of API design and not a function of routine R usage for data analysis. To many users of R they are not even aware that they are using OOP at all, especially for the S3 style of objects.

When you have an object, like `model <- lm(x~y)` or `my_hist <- hist(df$foo)`, you expected to be able to `plot` it or get a `summary`; you don't call `my_hist.summary`, you call `summary(my_hist)` and `plot(model)`. Many users never look further under the hood than this. And this fits nicely into piped workflows -- `lm(x~y) |> summary()` ends up being very natural, and when you fit in the tidyverse operators many very complex workflows end up being very easy to digest.

But when you do pull back the kimono it gets ugly fast. The teams involved in this are the right people who have been working to make R an amazing language mostly through enhancements to libraries, and now they're trying to push some of that functionality back into core R, which I think is fantastic.
Some of them, sure. Some of them are very bad.

But it's not the bots are bad.

The bot experience = $_investment * tech efficiency.

I've been in the chatbot industry for the last 6 years.

If you disable event past-gen NLP bots, millions of people will never be able to talk to a human agent or get any support at all. Unless companies invests 10x-100x more in customer care.

Even companies like Apple, in a premium segment of margins, use community forums and bots to manage their level of support.

LLM bots will bring us to a different reality when you can have 100x better customer support with the same level of investments.

And btw, that's why google is also moving this way.
Guido is probably right that tail recursion is unpythonic but he seems oddly proud of this. In defending Python's design decisions, he makes a great case for the prosecution.
YouTube still gives the creator way more control over the type of content they produce than anything you ever saw on network TV. What it does not give them is a captive audience. But then, why should anyone deserve a captive audience? Users should have all the choice of what they want to watch.
The often tattoo strays as part of those neuter and release programs.
Yeah typically you cannot use garbage collectors nor multithreading in smart contract development.
If there is no 1500-words long backstory for a new recipe (preferably unskippable), it's not worth anything. This would be the best time to combine new recipes with some sci-fi in the style of Asimov.
Funny how Python has a reputation as a functional language when it intentionally doesn’t have the features required to write in that style.
The context for TFA is this site; it's common knowledge.
Which lack the marketing and sales capability because they are a lot cheaper.
Curious what testing is covered that you don't have automated as part of the CI?
Historically it was the opposite: https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/killer-whales-work-wit... - the whalers worked with the orcas and gave them some of the catch. Cooperation, not competition.
> But the election is 1 month prior

Which means the public can make it an issue if it wants to.
There are no quantum computers in practical use at the moment. This essay^ by IBM (incredibly biased towards making quantum computing seem useful) provides many "visions of"'s and "potential to"'s and "may benefit"'s, but nothing in the present tense.

^https://www.ibm.com/quantum/blog/quantum-working-groups
Yes sounds like propaganda but I worry about the long term repair costs of the rest of a car like Tesla. They weren't built well in the first place and age can only make that worse. This is where right to repair would have really helped Tesla but no they have to act like every other crap SV company.
My understanding and suspicion is mostly less than you think. Llama 3 architecture has the following changes on GPT-2:

1. delete the absolute positional encoding and replace with RoPE

2. delete all biases in all layers (in LayerNorms, they
turn into RMSNorm)

3. GeLU -> SwiGLU non-linearity in the MLP

4. longer context length

5. architecture hyperparameter changes, e.g. slightly different aspect ratios

And there was a paper that I can't find the reference to anymore that claimed that if you train long enough, the gap becomes even lower. Possibly because the absolutely positional encoding has enough time to train more fully, where as the RoPE layer benefits from the "inductive bias" it adds in the earlier stages of training.

But I don't have full confidence on the above claim, maybe someone has tried or has better/concrete reference.
> Nah, just use Arenas/Pools. Or don't use heap at all.

This will solve more than 90% of problems. I'll also add that replace C pointers with a "Fat Pointer" or Go-like slice struct and avoid the C stdlib. Then you'll have fixed 99% of issues.
Lately I've been curious about building things like display controllers and microprocessors on the FPGA. It was

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_triggered_architectu...

that convinced me I could build a useful custom processor but it also got me to see how complex things get when you go pipelined, superscalar, depending on a cache, etc.
I'd probably use that, but the odds of me remembering it next time I need it is going to be approaching zero.

If I were you, I'd dedicate all your efforts on getting into the Vercel integrations page.

That's where I would re-find it, and probably more likely your user base. (scrappy js apps that don't care more than just getting something working and released)
I'm not that worried about this. It's pretty hard to kill an orca, and whoever decides to be a vigilante about this won't invest in some kind of custom orca-killing solution, they'll just use what they have on hand. And everyone has guns.

I suspect shooting the orcas with a handgun or small rifle round would have a deterrent effect, but probably not kill them. They're smart and social, so maybe "word" would spread quickly that this activity isn't so fun anymore.
In true enterprise fashion, they went with Java. Enterprise, confirmed.
Also:

> The only new information here is that his signature was on these documents.

This is what's called "confirming the story". News organisations do this all the time -- corroborate their competitors' stories -- and it is absolutely news.

In this case it's a really big bit of news, to people outside the tech world: it means there will likely prove to be concrete, potentially-lawsuit-bound corroboration that Sam Altman is not "consistently candid".
PM2.5 is around the hardest size to filter, I don't understand the physics but both larger and smaller are actually easier to remove from the air. Given that 2.5 is a useful estimate of worst case performance for a given setup.
> there is a category of "preferred owners."

There isn’t. There is a category of foreign adversaries. It’s negative selection, not positive. “Preferred owners” would be the U.S. government requiring joint venturing with a hand-picked JV partner. Like Beijing.
We are also legally entitled to that as well, this is how voting works. Community boards and local governments are intended to give people democratic control over the areas in which they live.
>Presumably smaller particles are also more difficult to filter

So, that may or may not be true for just passive filtering (like door and window frames), but it's actually not true for actual hepa-style filters, because the physics of particulate filtering is totally unintuitive from the macro level -- past a certain point, finer particulates actually become easier to filter, because the physics is dominated by two different effects at different sizes.

https://dynomight.net/ikea-purifier/#on-physics
You're throwing unrelated facts at the statement. Recentralization has absolutely nothing to do with being protected from DDoS or from other threats. Now, DDoS (and other kinds of) protection can be done by recentralization, but that's just one possible way.

Saying it's inevitable makes you seem like a Cloudflare apologist, which unfortunately we see way too often here on ycombinator. Has anyone refuted my suggestion that Cloudflare is knowingly evil? No. Have they downvoted because my information is incorrect? Also, no, or if they think I'm incorrect, they haven't bothered pointing out how.

People want to like the things they choose, and this, unfortunately, is where Cloudflare is cleverer than other large, evil companies.
In a way pulling AI and Robotics out of Tesla would be beneficial to the Engineering staff IMO. The highly competitive car market will eventual drag down any value increases in Tesla created by AI and Robotics. As individual entities they will be more like a startup and Engineers could receive more stock and see larger increases in the stock's value. Increasing Musk's ownership only helps musk - not the staff.
My dad was a recording engineer, so he knew where to go to find the sweet spot between "this sounds great" and "this sounds insanely fabulous but requires a second mortgage".

And yeah honestly I'm surprised you can get a turntable that isn't made for the audiophile market any more, but the one shown in the video for this app sure does lack any fine speed adjustment. Just a little button labeled 33/45.
[Odoo is Python based](https://github.com/odoo/odoo) and the 'core' modules are open -

Not providing any endorsement of the software nor can I say how the Odoo CRM/CMS compares to Salesforce. I've tried migrating a non Salesforce business to Odoo twice and haven't had success yet.
I'm gonna be honest, using the accelerometer will definitely be more accurate because you can take more samples over a longer period of time. That's how this project started, but I also felt uncomfortable putting my brand new phone on a fragile player and even more so asking other people to do the same.

Grooved is still very accurate, especially if you run multiple measurements to confirm on multiple songs/records. The threshold for "perfection" in the app is 0.01%, which to me anything beyond that is a rounding error and I could not tell the difference in my tests. This is equal to a drift of about a third of a second over an hour of listening.
https://youtu.be/6qD9XElTpCE

> Hear the story of Shor's Algorithm, straight from the source, Peter Shor.

Shor's part of the story starts in '81.

Though, I generally agree with the it is hard to make predictions that far out. We've got the math to do some higher things, but we still don't have flying cars and fusion power.
I didn't say they would.

The point is, there is a move for 'dense urban areas'. Pack 'em in. Increase that housing density. Yet there is another way in North America, where there is often an endless bounty of space. Better transportation corridors.

Better transportation corridors means that housing costs plateau, because it's just easier to drive 10 minutes more, 20 minutes more, than spend 4x for housing.

That said, even the laptop class often does need to commute:

* Many remote workers have to attend once a week, or more often.

* People make lives, friends, contacts, have relatives in specific areas.

* Every once in a while, you may need to go to "the city" for something important. Medical treatment or specialists, specialty products, etc. Not everything can be shipped, or is shipped.

Anyhow, it seems you sort of missed the point, that is... the faster you can get into a city, the further you can live from the city and still be part of it.

This reduces housing value close/in the city.
It seems you miss something, maybe because you don't consider DNSSEC as something that gets actual use.

With DNSSEC, somebody can reroute traffic all they like, they cannot generate fake DNS responses that are DNSSEC valid for DNSSEC secured victim domain. So if the CAA record is properly set to only allow the dns-01 validation method for ACME, there is simply no way to obtain a false certificate even if the attacker controls all of BGP.
Sure, the first amendment doesn't say much in general - but ownership of the press laws almost certainly impact on the 1A as interpreted today.
Wonder how many of the people flagging it work for Cloudflare?
They were creating those products before they became billionaires, and very likely without the expectation that they would become billionaires.
We have two adults and two kids and frequently need to be in two different places at the same time, each in a car, between the combination of two working adults and various activities.

I never said it was about saving the environment. (It’s about not being outright ridiculous in either direction.)
This is me. Fortunate to be able to retire at 55, programming my whole life, I love my career even when particular jobs had their issues. So now I work on projects I want to work on, no commute, no 20-person meetings.

I'm currently working with a team that's recreating the Prodigy online service servers in Elixir. Having a blast, and I have my next project already in mind, also in Elixir or some other BEAM language.

On top of that I'm reading programming-adjacent books and papers, for example on Category Theory and lambda calculus. I'm going through my backlog of interesting papers I've printed off over the last 30 years.

So no, not saving the world but keeping my mind engaged and loving it.
Putting the fox in the chicken coop?
Could you merge consistently and just cut stable releases on a scheduled cadence?
>Which means the public can make it an issue if it wants to.

That's what I'm saying, it's highly probable that it will be.
Why do you say it's "possible"? It's what they're actually doing. I think practically nobody in this thread actually watched the linked video that explains the technology.
Ian Bogost is more of an essayist than a journalist. His magnum opus is his analysis of the blue shell in Mario Kart. https://bogost.com/writing/blue-shell-discontents/
You don't need any great conspiracy theory about sentient animals plotting to reclaim the seas from humanity - from what I read, modern engine-powered ships cause a lot of noise pollution which directly affects marine animals like whales.

So I'm somewhat surprised they don't try to attack the things that all the annoying noise is coming from.