skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>I don't agree that "chasing" happiness is pointless

Considering that chasing happiness is the complement to contemplation, is considering that contemplation excludes happiness.

>We haven't managed to find any quote which would touch on that

The complement to contemplation is not chasing happiness, it is participating in the creation of what can be contemplated, and you can find plenty of quotes about that, like: "The desire to create is one of the deepest yearnings of the human soul." (Dieter F. Uchtdorf), or: "Creativity is intelligence having fun." (Albert Einstein). That can be whatever kind of creation: procreation, pieces of art, etc.
The French youtuber Deus Ex silicium made a through analysis. Basically, hearing aids are slightly worse than ordinary wireless headphones, but 10 times more expensive.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPmwfbLPHG8
That's exactly what happened to me when I tried to get the open-source models to extract a CSV from textual data with a lot of yes/no fields; i.e., the model forgot the column order and started confusing the cell values. I found I had to use more powerful models like Mistral Large or ChatGPT. So I think that is a valid thing to worry about with smaller models, but maybe less of a concern with larger ones.
If you can figure out which 90% we need when they are in seed stage you can become a billionaire venture capitalist. It's like someone spent their whole life searching a thousand volume library of where's Waldo books for a picture of Waldo and found him and told you where to find him and then you said, the guy is an idiot, I found Waldo right here and so could just about anyone!
> Altman's swift return to employees being told that the company would collapse without him.

Regardless of who said/who thought that... Why would it?

Engineers need to take a good look at the mirror and stop idolizing "visionary jerk" figures.
As long as one doesn't use bleeding edge technology like fingerprint scanners or webcam logins.
Three Laws of Software Complexity
What matters is that there is nothing listening on port 80 on the same IP address. That may be hard to control if you are using an environment with shared ingress.
> Everything you say is pure rhetoric, (...)

Do people self-assign those labels in spite of not actually having been diagnosed with any condition?

Yes or no?

If the answer is "no" then your post is just nonsense.
A plastic car cover. Cheap to make, bulky to transport.
i dont think people care where his money ends up when he dies

people probably care more about how he gets that money, and what he spends his life doing
That's a browser behaviour, perhaps a default setting. It has nothing to do with the media file.

For example,

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Media/Autoplay_...

If don't like browser playing an .mp3 file then don't use a client that auto-plays .mp3 files, or change browser settings so that this filetype does not auto-play.

It's like asking someone not to link to a PDF because it is "auto-displaying". If don't want PDF to display in browser then change browser settings so that it doesn't.

In the browser I use, I can associate any file extension with any MIME type. Even better, there is no built-in MP3 player, PDF viewer, or other omnibus cruft.
Tier 1 providers means the Internet backbone. These are the networks whose core business is interconnecting the whole world. Think Level 3 and Hurricane Electric. It makes zero sense for a Tier 1 provider to deploy reverse route filtering.

(Tier 2 providers are those with lots of interconnections, but not the whole world, just regionally. Tier 3 providers are those who just buy wholesale internet service from another provider and don't have many if any other interconnections.)

No sane provider restricts UDP. You might be thinking of one of the more obscure protocols like SCTP.
>And we also need to acknowledge that everyone was RIGHT!

And x86 will, too, be replaced.
Surely step one is carefully consider whether LLMs are the solution to you problem? That to me is the part where this is likely to go wrong for most people
People (well, teenagers) wil.wear headphones to the dinner table if you let them.
Bandwidth does not increase based on packing methods. Bandwidth refers to analog signal bandwidth, something we can measure - not data rate. MIMO gets around the Shannon limit by creating more channels, like putting more fibers in a bundle.
> To use the system, a person wearing off-the-shelf headphones fitted with microphones taps a button while directing their head at someone talking. The sound waves from that speaker’s voice then should reach the microphones on both sides of the headset simultaneously; there’s a 16-degree margin of error.

Perhaps the accuracy of identifying the correct voice could be vastly increased by adding video input. The AI can then try to match the various voices with the lip movements in the center of the video, basically lip reading.
I wonder how helpful “prompt unit tests” would be here?

Write the initial prompt, and write some tests to validate the output of the prompt. Then as the prompt grows you can observe the decline in performance at the initial task. Then you can decide if the new larger prompt is worth the decline in performance at it’s initial task.

It might not work for all tasks, but a good candidate would be - write SQL queries from natural language.
Line must go up.
The wheel is labeled things like "near miss" and "death".
> What do games studios gain by not making source code for old games (when available) public?

You have got that the wrong way around. What do games studios gain by releasing source code for old games? Unfortunately, very little. Some good will, maybe a bit of free advertising.

Meanwhile releasing the source is never free. At the very least they will need to pay someone to go over the source and check if they actually own all of it and remove anything that they cannot release.
Activist judge is a wild term for pointing out that BoD are all friends and even family with Musk and thus hardly independent.
I really like how you've included images in the resume, it solidifies your skill and is an easy way to make people read what you've done. However, I think it distracts from the text a bit too much (IMO) so maybe you should add a light background behind the names of the places you've worked at / studied, just to make it stand out.
Uber-Successful Silicon Valley tech entrepreneur is a manipulative narcissist.
News at 8.
"from a local mirror" does not involve transferring the binary over the slow link.
I hadn't, that's super interesting thanks for the pointer.
I think that’s just a typo. Probably should have been “note that ZGC and genZGC are production-ready”.
Russia mulling charging companies to use foreign software
They can't they just don't want to.
One Weird Trick for Efficient Pangenomic Variation Graphs
I love this.

I know this is just the beginning and the tech and UX will mature a lot - but being able to consciously choose what we allow into our sensory world would be a great superpower to have.

In the distant future this will all be embedded inside a cochlear (neural?) implant.

You can "save" known voices, prioritize them, identify various scenes/modes automatically like meetings/parties/concerts/driving/walking etc, know when to allow external sounds in (alarms, honks, someone calling your attention, etc)

And with great power yada yada.

I can already imagine a few ways this can be misused / abused / create non-existent challenges and problems too. But I am (cautiously) optimistic that we as human race will collectively figure out how to steer these new technology applications into net positive territory.

2040: iAudio and xSmell blamed for people losing connect with nature's sounds (like bird chirps and flowing streams) and smells (petrichor) - things that inspire us, make us creative, make life worthwile, and make us humans.
How would you track the target with beam-forming? If the target left the room and later returned how would you recognize this and resume tracking them?
What we all had 30y ago is now a luxury. Good. Keep going...
How Brake password bank money transfer system
> so what?

So that's exactly the whole point of this discussion: turning psychiatric labels into identities.

> fact according to who?

According to the fact that people do self-portray and self-identify as labels in spite of not even subjecting themselves to a diagnose or even actually any condition.

To deny this fact you need to deny things like for example Munchausen syndrome or even hypochondria.
Now read the same sentence with a different clumping.
Yep. My grandma (may she rest in peace) had all those.
I've actually thought of doing something like they did when she was alive and I've tried communicating with her at family events or in-public.

I guess they're expensive because of relations with medical / health companies being complaint makes things expensive (eg. the same display but with certification to use in a medical facility would cost many times more).
1. You assume that what press reports and public opinion is the same thing. It's not.

2. You assume majority of the public actually has an opinion or time to think about whether Sam should run OpenAI. They don't.

3. You assume public opinion is an accurate metric of justice. It's not. We have judicial system for that.

4. You assume Sam makes decisions through his ego and not any other system. You don't know that. Your ego thinks it's true. But honestly you have zero information unless you are really close to Sam in that case you have no reason to make this comment.
>pivot

>Now we can come up with an alternative way

Spoken like a true SF commie.
Technically impressive, but unfortunately feels basically like a PR stunt.

The title suggests that the melted material will be removed soon but is not realistic. At this moment should say "will try to remove 3 grams from the >800 tons of melted fuel. At this pace, the place will be safe by natural means much before the robot will end the work.

Apart of this, I wonder... is this stuff still usable? There is something that could be done with this grams of melted dust that would worth the risk of spreading it around?

...

Second: why to design a robot for that, or move electronics close to this area so they can fry in seconds?.

The idea that must be some sort of robot (because some sort of idealized human rescuer figure is what the public expects) is not very smart. What they need is maybe (IMAO) a sort of "anteater-tongue machine" that just will try each crevice until finding the correct path. A sort of strictly mechanical machine moved from a safe distance with a real human brain taking the decisions much faster.

If you need to move a tube there are a lot of solid mechanical joints in the market tested since decades for every possible need. All needed is an axis able to rotate, a motor placed very far away, and a removable set of arms that would pick and vacuum the stuff and would double as "fuel rods" or something later when will be unavoidably contaminated. Just cut the tube in appropriate lengths and put the contaminated rod to sleep in the pool with the other stuff.

If electronics are an obstacle, just remove it entirely and use a stochastical movement instead a directed one.

Radioactive dust in the path could be grabbed with some type of greasy or sticky material before to be collected by a moving ring. No need to design a complicated claw here. There are several metallic types of grease available that could jail the dust and maybe even, dunno, provide benefits to block the dust radiation somehow into a matrix of metallic particles.

If you need to see the path, use echolocation or maybe run a camera forward for one second to retreat it fast to safety. The "tongue" could be used as a rail for the camera.

Alternatively, they could made the path safer first deploying a lead jacket made with tubes or plates where the robot can move. If the room is radioactive, line it in lead lames. That would also remove coins and crevices and would made the route much safer for people and machines and easier to navigate until the final part.
If anything, YouTube search in Russian context is extremely West-biased. It's impossible to find any original source of Putin saying anything, for example. Yesterday he was talking about Zelensky not being legitimate. The search results are literally: Radio Liberty, some Azerbajani channel, Ukrainian channel called FREEДОМ - obvious pro-western vibes, DW, Ukrainian UNIAN, BBC etc. It's one thing if they were blocking these and only showing goverment propaganda, but it's actually the other way around.
> It costs time whenever a coworker has toggled the wrong setting and you must debug.

Why do you have team members toggling settings at random at will?

If that's a real problem with your organization, you have far more pressing problems than the number of options offered by a service you consume.
Not parent-poster, but I did a bit more digging since (the linked article is terribly incomplete) and found out that not only did the driver also die, but the passenger was also tested (posthumously?) as being over the legal BAC limit.

[0] https://www.indystar.com/story/news/crime/2017/02/08/tesla-m...
I'll be looking for this in Hollywood movies
Because the whole point is a mitm can compromise it, and the mitm can listen on 80 regardless if you turn yours off.
Open sourcing a game does not mean also releasing the assets under a free license. Usually players still need to buy those.
Thousands of years of history and culture, preserved in an app until the next incompatible Android/iOS release renders it inaccessible to anybody. Sigh.
Would ground operated intelligent unmanned equipment be more difficult to reach telecommunication wise than in the air?
I think the point of that was, it'll cost the same as todays ~20000 euro cars. so whatever price they have in 27
Forget about replacing doctors with AI–just get our computers to work
This is why I don't get why OpenAI doesn't open source their TTS. I've read that it is because of the risk of misuse, but if they release it with only two voices, one male and one female voice, and ensure that these voices are recognizable AI voices (in the sense of popular), there shouldn't be any risk?

Most of us just need a machine to have the ability to speak to us in a way that sounds halfway human, but not as horrible as old open source TTS systems.
that's not a manager, that's an internal client from hell.

and yes, the world is full of these dysfunctional groups flush with money. (you might euphemistically call it this or that VC/startup scene)

on one hand it's great that there's plenty of room for technical improvement, on the other it needs the right socioeconomic circumstances. sometimes FOSS helps with this. (developers who spend their career working on products based on FOSS stuff at least have some chance of knowing that their efforts can might be valuable for a wider audience.)
The client-side library should disable HTTP by default to ensure that raw data never leaves the local environment, thereby avoiding any leakage.
It comes and goes. This is the twilight of this era of mediocre technologists known by sight by the bouncers at the Battery.
I'll go further and say that a bank should be required by law to implement and enable access to open banking APIs.

As well as not require, under any circumstances, an account holder to install a proprietary application in order to use the bank.
I'm going to ignore the personal attacks since you seem to want to genuinely learn something.

1) The difference between WezTerm's multiplexing and say tmux, is that wezterm's multiplexing supports all the same features/bugs/syntax and quirks as WezTerm itself. It does not have to translate between what it gets from an unrelated terminal implementation that it has only the most superficial information about to its own internal representation and back, which is what a multiplexer like tmux has to do. Tomorrow if Wez decides to add a new feature to WezTerm, he can add it to his multiplexer at the same time. Thus, the WezTerm multiplexer is a) much more robust than tmux b) not a drag on the entire ecosystem since nothing other than WezTerm itself depends on it implementing anything.

And therefore, unlike tmux, it is not a horrible hack.

To put it another way, tty's are sufficiently complex that multiplexing if needed at all, must be done by the terminal emulator, not an unrelated third party sitting in the middle. You say a multiplexer is another terminal inside the first, I say that is precisely the problem. It is an incompatible terminal emulator.
Could it be used to teach me Mandarin? Actually since it's only voice synthesis, I guess it would still miss the voice recognition and capability the quality of my attempt to reproduce tonal language sentences.
Windows 11 started as what was left from Windows 10X project, but going forward with Win32/COM instead of WinRT/UWP.

"How Windows 10X runs UWP and Win32 apps"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztrmrIlgbIc
> I think that's the reason why they do not want to open source their old games.

In other words, either their finances are too tight to spare the effort, or they simply don't care about their games as works of artistic merit that might need to be preserved or even improved across generations of devices and operating systems, but rather just as products to earn money off of and then abandon.
As far as I know early employees made out like bandits at Google, Microsoft, etc.

Even the later employees did.
We've certainly adopted those bits of the ancient knowledge that helped us survive and thrive. The rest of it did not survive because ancient cultures did not develop their equivalent of the printing press allowing for storage and dissemination of knowledge.
>> Most humans will be born, live and die inventing absolutely nothing, even those with the opportunity and resources to do so.

I don't think that's right at all. I like to visit museums. You really get hit in the face with the unending creativity of the human mind and the variety of all that human hands have crafted over thousands of years across hundreds of cultures. I would go as far as to say that the natural state of the human mind is to create new things all the time. And mathematics itself was not created (invented or discovered) by one person, but by many thousands.

In any case, it doesn't matter if one instance of the class of human minds hasn't invented anything, in the same way that it doesn't matter if one car can't do 80mph. It's indisputable that we have the capacity for some novelty, and generality, in our thinking. Maybe not every member of the species will achieve the same things, but the fact is that the species, as a species, has the ability to come up with never-before seen things: art, maths, tech, bad poetry, you name it.

>> Lecun may disagree but some others like Hinton, Ilya and Norvig don't.

I'm with LeCun and Bengio. There's a fair amount of confusion about what a "model" is in that sense: a theory of the world. There's no reason why LLMs should have that. Maybe a transformer architecture could develop a model of the world- but it would have to be trained on, well, the world, first. Sutskever's bet is that a model can be learned from text generated by entities that already have a world model, i.e. us, but LeCun is right in pointing out that a lot of what we know about the world is never transmitted by text or language.

I can see that in my work: I work with planning, right now, where the standard thing is to create a model in some mathematical logic notation, that is at once as powerful as human language and much more precise, and then let a planning agent make decisions according to that model. It's obvious that despite having rich and powerful notations available there is information about the world that we simply don't know how to encode. That information will not be found in text, either.

Sutskever again seems to think that, that kind of information, can somehow be guessed from the text, but that seems like a very tall order, and Transformers don't look like the right architecture. You need something that can learn hidden (latent) variables. Transformers can't do that.
>Fdroid still has the privileged extension whereas droidify and Neodroid can use Shizuku and other options.

What is all of this, care to elaborate?

A lot of actually uncommon knowledge is being assumed here.
Enforcing a BM25 baseline for every RAG project will keep so many "talk to your pdf" projects off your plate.
From the readme:

> Internally, some absolutely hideous shenanegans are involved to make this possible!

Yeah, like literally embedding a dll in the header file.

Pretty cool, but seems kinda fragile.
Show HN: Slipshow – A presentation tool not based on slides
I also suspect the author meant "humongous" in:

> Shenandoah is location-based, so there are regions, and region sizes, and therefore _homologous_ allocation is a special case to be handled.
> I remember something about the manual door latch being behind a speaker like cover in early Tesla models?

Was curious and did some searching, AFAICT it looks like someone on the front-seat is often OK, but if you're in the back seat you may be in trouble.

Model S involves a cable behind your ankles:

https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/models/en_us/GUID-AAD769C...

The Model X involves removing a speaker grille and pulling a cable down and towards the front of the car:

https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/modelx/en_us/GUID-AAD769C...

In the Model 3 you have to know to pry up a piece of molding in a lower pocket of the door before manipulating a cable:

https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/model3/en_us/GUID-A7A60DC...

Model Y is like 3 except some of them do not have a manual release for rear-passengers, and those that do involve another step to pull up a mat from the bottom of the door-pocket:

https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/modely/en_us/GUID-AAD769C...
Yes, it WOULD make sens for copyright to work this way. A limited time monopoly in exchange for making sure the work actually enters the commons after that limited time. Unfortunately what we currently have is a much much worse deal for society.
Andrej Karpathy karpathy is a magician!

But being the coolest kid on the block with pure C/CUDA implementation is not enough
https://github.com/karpathy/llm.c

Studying a baby Llama 2 model source code in pure Mojo is the next level
https://github.com/tairov/llama2.mojo
https://github.com/tairov/llama2.mojo/blob/master/llama2.moj...

Mojo Lang - Tomorrow's High Performance Python? (with Chris Lattner)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRcXUuQYR90

Andrej Karpathy and Chris Lattner collab is on my wishlist ;)
TTimo?
It seems to be a wrapper.
The end goal now seems to have Azure as Azure OS kind of thing.

And it isn't only Windows, notice the whole drama regarding XBox hardware.
It is not hard to keep track of new css/js features, as the articles pop up very often, e.g: https://developer.chrome.com/blog/whats-new-css-ui-2023

Most of us just decide to ignore them, because a significant portion of our userbase stills stuck with old devices. People who agree with this article probably never get accessed to any website statistic dashboard.
"Remote workers were not only more productive they were more satisfied with remote work than they had been with working in a traditional office"

I think some citation is needed here, there are multiple studies and they have very varied outcome. This one for instance find that productivity drops 18% when working from home: https://www.nber.org/papers/w31515

At best he is cherry picking his studies and ignoring the contrarian studies, at worst he is blindy pushing his own interest and views.