skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Specifically, GQL implementations always map to a `resolve(source, args, context, info)` function (the names can be anything, the types are what matter). In that sense, you also get a standard server interface similar to wsgi/psgi/rack, but much more fine-grained (there can be a resolver for every field in the query).
I havent done the numbers but you are probably right.

Orbits are very unintuitive things. For starters they're much higher than a suborbital trajectory.

You would also need to pre-target to stage in orbit and at that point you're locked into that trajectory unless you brought A LOT of extra fuel. This would inevitably be slower and less flexible regardless.

The only way for this to have any advantage is to stage a ton of nukes in orbit at different trajectories, which is politically insane.
Lumen (merger of Level3 and CenturyLink) sells services to a large part of the Internet and may provide a lot of the backhaul for Windstream. In which case they would be in the path for monitoring.
Virtually all info that reaches outsiders has a strong PR component, and often is entirely PR. We're left to "read the tea leaves" from our own experience with such statements.
Yeah, there is a deep human drive to both form opinions on topics and fit them to narratives. Most people are deeply uncomfortable admitting that they don't know, cant know, or will never know something.

As a result, random people on the street form strong opinions on everything, from Sama's psychology and internal narrative to nuclear reactor design.

It is wildly delusional when you think about it.
I read somewhere this week that China removed their charter clause that "nuclear is a war that cannot be won" as a response to the U.S. potentially having capability to intercept / block their retaliatory strike.
My own tin foil hat theory is that "state" in that usage entered into common English use (in U.S.) because of foreign actors. Rush Limbaugh, et al. have been talking about "deep state" long before it entered common use around the 2020 election.
I mean, sure. I'm generally more WET than most of my colleagues, but this...

> Applying DRY principles too rigidly leads to premature abstractions that make future changes more complex than necessary.

... is just one of those things that sounds wise, but is just basically a tautology. Use the best tool for the job, etc. No kidding? Would never have thought of that on my own, thanks sensei.

Seriously, the issue with the quoted statement is not that it's new to anyone, it's that no one thinks they ARE applying DRY principles "too rigidly". This is just chin beard stroking advice for "everyone else".
It's interesting that the alternative things you listed that can go into roads are all incredibly expensive and also produce high amounts of carbon. I happen to live in a mining capital. Looking around, I'm convinced that there is nothing clean about sand, stone, concrete, or anything else they make gravel out of. Hence my skepticism.
I had experience working with seo specialist, most of people in seo are there because good money is paid by startups to bring there site organic traffic by whatever black hat seo method, seo stands a good marketing tool for these startups.
You literally have to force people NOT to use Google Search. That’s how much people like Google. For that reason, the vast majority of population on earth have voted and they have made Google the custodian of the internet. I don’t understand the criticism that Google has ruined the internet. It’s a company with shareholders who demand y/o/ growth. Their job is to be make money by providing a useful service in the process. A service which is extremely expensive to run. If people don’t want Google to have this much power of the internet, then you need to campaign for consumers to stop using it. The odds of that succeeding is zero. That means the ball is in Google’s court and they can do whatever they please.
I'd much rather find out the hard way that I need something than find out the hard way that I don't. There was one project where OpenAPI became a bit painful and I rediscovered why GraphQL could make sense, but it didn't reach the threshold.
I'm afraid that AGPL is not an actual open-source launch test. As a developer, I wouldn't contribute to such a product.
That has some json-ish embedded inside it, but the query itself still isn't json.

And even the embedded part isn't valid json without quoting the keys.
Child Ozempic use soars 600% in three years – but is it safe
The sentence I am criticizing is not about interception of ICBMs, so your link is not relevant.

In particular, when the goal is to intercept an ICBM, the enemy helpfully raises the target to be (briefly) at the same altitude as the satellite. (An ICBM's max altitude is much higher than low-earth orbit.) If the goal is for a satellite to attack a city, the enemy does not helpfully raise the city to orbital altitudes.
Against Optimization
I'm guessing it's relativity doing its job.
If a ship doesn't have insurance it should not be allowed to dock.

It's not that complicated.

When driving into Saudi Arabia in your own car, you are required to show proof of insurance (or can purchase travel insurance at the border).
lol get a real dba, saying you know so many developers hitting a particular issue is just another way of saying I know so many people who don’t know what they’re doing.

RDBMS are complex and have to handle the most wide variety of applications of any modern software in existence.

Accommodating your particular niche use case of make Postgres be my own magical dba because I don’t know how to run a simple query to check if my FK columns have indexes is pretty silly.
I have to say, I'm very confused. There is possibly something very cool here, but confusion reigns supreme for me right now.

In the "A", or "signed angle outside" example [1], what defines the position of the points making the A?

Also, the amount of text required to make that examples seems huge, when you consider the >600 lines of style. How is this advantageous over SVG, which can also be semantically-meaningful?

1. https://penrose.cs.cmu.edu/try/?examples=walk-on-spheres%2FS...
I love the comment on that video: "Imagine you wake up and you're just doomguy"
Wasabi non-operational us-east-1 and us-east-2
These aren't likely 'top flows', since the C&C data will probably only be a few kilobytes.

So to capture this, you at a minimum need to be logging every TCP connection's SRC IP and DST IP.

And they seem pretty confident in their worldwide map and fairly exact counts, so I would guess they must have probes covering most of the world doing this monitoring, and it likely isn't just 1-in-a-million sampling either...
This has been making waves in the SEO world. I was always more surprised that people honestly believed Google wasn't manipulating results. In the political realm it was treated as tinfoil hat territory.
4 people and 100 servers? that's all? that's a drop in a bucket, won't event make a dent in the black market of ransomware.
The OP is right that in everyday talk state is not used in the general sense of "government"
It would be great to see new practical software for declarative specification of general 2D diagrams. With increasing emphasis recently on language-based tools, this is an excellent opportunity.

It would be good to find ways to make the internal algorithms and their parameters more "open" or more easily parameterized and recombined in novel ways. It would be good to find ways to rely on more generic optimization methods, though software like this is probably skating on the edge of computational intractability (not to mention usability or interpretability issues) so it's a very challenging problem.

Kudos.
RIP ICQ: Remembering a classic messaging app that was way ahead of its time
OpenWrt works for some modems pretty fine. It's not straight forward as the VDSL firmware can't often be distributed but poeple use it on avm Fritzbox devices. Also LTE devices are supported. Not sure about cable modems, probably not. It's probably involved and not straight forward so for most users, even technical ones it's no alternative.
The US was the only one with functioning nukes. That short period was not a nuclear war.
I was interested in the claim that we have enough nuclear weapons to wipe ourselves out.

https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/460/do-we-have-...

I guess it depends on how you want to wipe out humanity. Nuclear winter or ecosystem disruption might do it, but explosions and radiation probably won't.
The "degraded" performance in our case seems to be all api requests.
In stawberry you make a method per field you want to retrieve, I would say it is indeed more complex and costly.
Because people have a limited appetite for complexity.

I wrote some front-end stuff back in the days but I've lost track of whatever is happening these days. jQuery to append some stuff took five minutes to learn, but learning react hooks takes a determined effort.

Likewise, adding a field to a graphql type is simple, but doing it with authorization, controlling n+1s, adding tests etc.. requires front-end folks to actually invest time in learning whatever back-end they're dealing with this time.

Everything is just a lot more complicated these days, and if you've been around for a while you may not be excited anymore by the churn, but rather fed up.
I pay for Kagi and Nebula because these services actually give me a good experience for my money.

The last time I tried YouTube Premium, I found out that the iOS app will frequently loose your last viewed video in the background, because I turned off the playback history. I would turn it on, except it is the only way of stopping Google from using your views for, you guessed it, targeted advertising.

This makes sense, because Premium users are more attractive advertising targets. The only way to be truly safe is with an adblocker.
Sure. The overall proof of Thales is then about as complicated as the “standard” one with two isosceles triangles.
For saving Tweets, I kick off an archival job from the command line to archive.today|is|ph and then bookmark the resulting link with Raindrop via API call. Not sure if that helps you, I hope that it does!
They said last year if resources allow it, they would perhaps port Orion to other platforms.

https://orionfeedback.org/d/2321-orion-for-windows-android-l...

> We are getting a lot of repeat questions about windows/linux/android version and sometimes it appears that users think that the team is choosing not to work on these platforms. The situation is quite different and simpler - we do not have the resources to hire a new team to do any of these platforms yet.

> And since Orion is funded by its users only, it is entirely up to the number of subscribers and Orion+ sales we have that will enable funding a new team to make Orion for any new platform. And building a browser is not cheap, especially one on top of WebKit.

> Ways you can help accelerate this is:

> - Contribute to Orion development with your time

> - Help spread the word about Orion to attract more users

> - Get Orion+ and financially support developmet
Deleting things happens all the time though.

Yeah sure you can make it work with anything if you spend the extra effort but the ownership really isn't as defined as in REST.

Is there code which have fuzzy or no ownership? Are there changes which affect other teams? Suddenly those became much harder questions to answer.
I'm also far from an expert on wavelength stuff when it comes to applied uses, so I'd have similar questions.

But my hearing aids do in fact already have two mics per ear (about half an inch apart), and use them to let me block out some of the noise behind me.

I suspect you definitely get big improvements from a greater spacing in a microphone array than what fits on an ear though!
Apparently, the B programming language from 1969 fit into 8 KB of memory: https://www.bell-labs.com/usr/dmr/www/chist.html

After a rapidly scuttled attempt at Fortran, he created instead a language of his own, which he called B. B can be thought of as C without types; more accurately, it is BCPL squeezed into 8K bytes of memory and filtered through Thompson's brain.
It's a no-win situation. Sure, disabling firmware updates would have prevented this attack, but it would also prevent security fixes that keep the routers from being turned into a botnet.

But what I don't get in this case is why it was not possible to reset the device to its original state. It seems like a misdesign if it's possible to destroy all of the firmware, including the backup.
I think the idea is in an arms race, if you can't launch ICBM nukes anymore (because of Musk's orbital interceptors) then you have to pre-launch nukes into orbit. THOSE nukes can then strike faster than ICBMs (just like interceptors can).
OData existed before GraphQL in the wild, it's possible to suggest GraphQL reinvented OData.

https://www.odata.org/
These are usually implemented as actual whitelists. Someone goes through each AS, and decides whether it should have unrestricted access or not. Verizon gets unlimited access, because it mostly provides service to end users. Hetzner doesn't, because it mostly has servers. There are companies that enumerate all networks and tell you if they are user-mostly or server-mostly networks, so you can block all but the user-mostly networks.
Relativity: The Special and the General Theory (1916) Einstein, Albert

https://www.abebooks.com/9780517884416/Relativity-Special-Ge...
Donald Trump and Elon Musk's Growing Alliance
Idk. Is this actually needed in practice? Most RTC chips are off by several seconds per day. If you need accurate time you sync them to an outside source (a network time server or GPS). Does it matter if your oscillator is 56 microseconds off because of relativistic effects if it is off by multiple seconds because the chip is cheap?

You need some sort of network connections back to Earth anyway, can't you just spare a few NTP packets here and there and be done with it?

I haven't read the underlying white paper yet and maybe that will change my mind, but the CNN article hasn't convinced me yet that this is a problem worth worrying about.
Show HN: The Easiest Way to Customize Bootstrap Based Styles Without Important
custom-bs is a bootstrap based sass framework based on bootstrapcss which allows you to include only what you want from bootstrap allowing you to customize your styles easly without using !important everywhere, it's like tailwindcss but bs-based
Like the article ends with, DRY goes hand in hand with YAGNI. The point isn't to build a million abstractions; it's to find the places where you have duplication and de-duplicate it, or where you know there'll be duplication and abstract it, or to simply rearchitect/redesign to avoid complexity and duplication. This applies to code, data models, interfaces, etc.

The duplication is typically bad because it leads to inconsistency which leads to bugs. If your code is highly cohesive and loosely coupled, this is less likely [across independent components].

And on this:

> When designing abstractions, do not prematurely couple behaviors

Don't ever couple behaviors, unless it's within the same component. Keep your code highly cohesive and loosely coupled. Once it's complete, wall it off from the other components with a loosely-coupled interface. Even if that means repeating yourself. But don't let anyone make the mistake of thinking they both work the same because they have similar-looking interfaces or behaviors, or you will be stuck again in the morass of low cohesion. This is probably one of the 3 biggest problems in software design.

Libraries are a great help here, but libraries must be both backwards compatible, and not tightly coupled. Lack of backwards compatibility is probably the 4th biggest problem...
If your nukes are intercepted before any of them can hit their targets, do they count as functioning nukes?
Yeah people are acting like everyone needs to scramble to take advantage of this, but it's mainly not actionable to improve your own rankings.

If you're a black hat then I guess making your clickfarms spend more time on your site might be useful now, but if you are playing by the book then continuing to make good content that people want to read remains the most important factor.
I'm envious of your success. I'm convinced that reading dense technical books is crucial to developing yourself over time, but I have a hard time reading technical books alone. The few times I've been in a book club they started out great, but fizzled out in a couple of months. Maybe I'll look into it again.
I don't know, I used GraphQL in a small project and I absolutely hated it. I mean, it was definitely workable, but I just absolutely hated writing those queries. Why am I having to write these again? It's not my website, so why am I in charge of writing the API?
Maintenance is 90% of a project life time. Sometime those "best practices" rigid implemented means the project won't live to see even it's 1st birthday.
This is circular reasoning. You can't convince people to not use it if you don't criticize it, and of course the odds of that succeeding are zero if you don't even try.

Also, you literally have to force people to not use google search because it's the near universal default. The majority of the population with internet access does not care about it being google in particular as long as the engine works.
We don't know that. In fact, the product has existed for almost 10 years, and they still haven't added ads.

The obvious reason they haven't added in ads is that the subscription model is more profitable, and the lack of ads is the only reason anyone is actually subscribing. The moment that stops being the case and they start showing ads on videos again, even at a lower frequency, is the moment they burn a $10 billion / year business to the ground.

So I don't think it'll happen. But if it does, so what? I'll just cancel my subscription for the future, and likely stop using YouTube entirely. It won't erase the benefits I had from the subscription until then. Like, they can't make me retroactively watch ads.
What bear are western governments poking? And what have they done that implies those western governments think they can 'win' a nuclear war?
It does not work as well anymore as it once did, and it will continue to
flatten out.

People can only afford a limited number of subscriptions at a time,
and with an ever-increasing number of companies putting their hand
into that pocket, there is less to go around.
Arduino FDX-B (animal ID chip) reader built from discrete components
Light might in theory reach an ICBM in boost, but anything you launch is going to need to go through its own acceleration phase to possibly hit the ICBM.

Further your ignoring submarines and early proximity detonation on the nukes. The most likely result of building such a system is an early nuclear EMP clearing orbit before the nukes get through anyway.
Cool. I went through elixirschool a couple of years ago but didn't know it had logic programming builtin.
In this case the App Store is actively harming people by removing their ability to install updates themselves or even access the data files the app is storing on their own device.
I’d run a couple pair of OS2 fiber to each room.

I would also have a closet somewhere in the house big enough for a 42u rack, with a 220v 30a circuit, and some cooling.

The other thing I would do is have all the switch boxes be extra depth so that smart switches and dimmers will fit in better. It is hard to get them into standard depth boxes.
If its much more than 100 bucks, I'd be pretty surprised, honestly. A quick google shows most Nissan CVT fluids (even the OEM "unicorn tears") at ~80 dollars for the usual 5 quarts etc. Virtually all the "proprietary" fluids are just rebranded mainstream brands (castrol/Valvoline etc etc), most car OEMs are not in the business of manufacturing their raw fluids themselves.
Everything in capitalism is a resource-for-cash grab.
Astra is not private yet. The SEC is still reviewing the take-private offer that Astra's board accepted from the group of investors. The take-private move is essentially an acquisition.
Here's the page about his current book club. There's a Google Form link to sign up, which hopefully I'm not too late for since I just filled it out!

https://eatonphil.com/2024-understanding-software-dynamics.h...
Doesn't mean the cup is any good at absorbing it.
In the spirit of the posted proof, noting axial symmetry would be neater.

(But then you need to know that parallelogram diagonals split each other in half, …)
The PC Engines boards are great for that. I've got mine running OPNSense (FreeBSD) and it's not required any fuss.
> I think you're selectively reading that to fit your narrative.

Please don’t tell people they are selectively reading things, because if you are going to do that, I can do the same right back to you. You will note up-thread I’m complaining about gaps in the Java language (not platform) which are why Lombok exists, and the Java language maintainers’ unwillingness to provide official solutions within the language to address that - which is something Kotlin handles much better (it has some Lombok-like features, plus its DSL support). So, just as you accuse me of selectively reading that blog post to fit my narrative, I can accuse you of selectively reading this thread to fit yours - but mutual accusations of “selective reading” aren’t really adding anything useful to the conversation, are they?

> The design choices of the Java language are the design choices of the Java Platform and that's exactly why they chose it:

No. As I said, the design choices of the Java language not to provide many Lombok-style features, whereas Kotlin does, has nothing to do with the JVM as a platform
I didn't see that in the OP, are you referencing some other information?
>> if you hit it at its apogee, a lot of it will burn up in the atmophere.

Having several pounds of plutonium burn up in the atmosphere just means it will be spread over a very wide area which is much worse than a chunk of it falling somewhere.
All of Microsoft's MacBook Air-beating benchmarks
Also: https://archive.ph/6cFqw

and: https://archive.ph/gYtQB
Needed!
The NT kernel and XNU (macOS) are considered hybrid kernels. QNX, a microkernel, is absolutely everywhere (i.e., cars).

Performance of microkernels is or was a hotly debated topic back in the '90s; microkernels generally had lower performance than their monolithic counterparts. There was a famous argument comparing Linux (monolithic) to MINIX (micro) [0]. Wikipedia has simple explanations for the differences between hybrid, mono, and micro kernels that serve as a decent primer [1] and a visual that I find helpful [2].

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanenbaum%E2%80%93Torvalds_deb...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernel_(operating_system)

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_kernel#/media/File:OS-s...
A good starting point for this question would be this famous discussion:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanenbaum–Torvalds_debate

Which in a nutshell comes down to Linus's view that producing a system that meets current needs (for example by offering a simple API) and is reasonably performant -- even if it ran on but a single architecture such as the i386 -- was more promising than a design offering "theoretical" benefits (such as portability) but which either didn't deliver the goods today or just wasn't reasonably performant.

This is a vast simplification of a much broader set of issues but if one digs into the notes of why subsequent projects (e.g. Windows NT) moved away from microkernel designs, or the roughly analogous microservices debate of the past decade -- one often finds echoes of the same basic considerations.
It feels like this is happening in US politics, and has been for some time. I'm in the US so I can only speak to it, but perhaps the world over?
Yes I'll keep adding people until at least this weekend when the first chapter discussion starts.
Was "Content fails to accord" really unclear?

> marketing / sales

Marketing != sales.

The accurate title "Do marketing before build" would have got more "well obviously" than clicks.