skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I summarize here [1], you can find more context here [2], and learn more about the differences here [3]. For a detailed explanation of the new design see the video talk above.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40483749

[2] https://www.reddit.com/r/Freenet/comments/1d05zw9/questions_...

[3] https://freenet.org/faq#faq-3
If you refuse to teach the kids category theory and queer communism there's no point. Have all the kids you want. The empire is still going to collapse. Knowledge has moved beyond the empire.
Does he have a lot of stock in student loan companies? Sounds like it.
Pair programming, in my case, mostly degenerates into "no, wait, don't, how about, what if, hm, if you click on the, on the, button there, no not there, left left left, the third from- yeah that one, ah right, thanks for guessing what I meant". (obviously not always, but the language center of my brain is obviously not well connected to the programming center, and I have noticed similar behavior from several other programmers).

Let's hope the results are somewhat better than previous attempt ala COBOL.

Regarding verification, in my opinion the foundation for current LLMs is, similar to humans, not far from total hallucinations. I am not sure if actual verification is really possible in that direction. At most "well, 99% of the others have been doing it that way for the past ten years".
Researching new ways to apply spaced repetition and LLMs to second language acquisition. Reach out to me via my blog, LinkedIn, Reddit, GitHub etc.. if you feel the same way.
Has he? The ones I'm aware of he was complaining about the low quality of the generic kernel drivers. AMD software had a tendency to crash when doing anything outside of standard video games (which was my experience too, but I've caved and bought Nvidia since then; average driver quality of Nvidia on linux seems to be much lower but the kernel doesn't go down which is nice. Got a lot of OOM errors where on ROCm the kernel froze requiring a full system restart).

But this is interesting and probably strong evidence that the CUDA API isn't the moat people thought it was. CUDA multiplies matricies and that is close to a commodity operation. The moat actually seems to be Nvidia's higher generic software engineering standards, the difficulty in writing job scheduling/memory management infrastructure and possibly the fact that closed firmware is the norm.
But if the dangerous route takes only 15 minutes, and the safe ones take an hour, why shouldn't I, being fully aware of the risks, have the option to take it when I want to?

I don't know where I called anyone lazy.
> No one, not the Chinese, Russians, French, Koreans, Japanese, Isrealis or the Americans

Not true for the Chinese.

They figured out that in order to drive costs down you need to standardize and build the same reactor over and over again. The reactor is called Hualong One [1]. China has already built 4 domestically, 2 for Pakistan and has 11 under construction. 4 more such reactors were approved for the domestic market [2] and 4 other reactors are under contract for the foreign market (3 in Pakistan, 1 in Argentina).

The 6 reactors that China has already built took between 5 and 8 years each. The average construction time is about 6.5 years. As for the cost, that is difficult to estimate for the domestic reactors but the 2 reactors built for Pakistan were delivered for $6.5 BN. They were delivered on time and on budget.

Since each such reactor generates 1.1 GW of electricity, this comes to $3 billion per GW. This is definitely economically profitable.

Now, if you want to reply that solar and wind are even more profitable, that is probably true, but that's moving the goal posts. Your claim was that nobody, including China, was able to build profitable nuclear at all, and that is patently not true.

Second, the 2 reactors delivered to Pakistan were among the first wave of Hualong One reactors built. Three of the 4 finalized domestic reactors were delivered after the Pakistani ones. It is entirely possible that China has achieved some cost reductions through repetition, and the cost of the reactors currently under construction is significantly lower, and the future one will achieve still further efficiencies.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hualong_One

[2] https://world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/China-approves-const...
It’s better not to pay off your house else you lose the tax deduction! Seems perverse. Pay it off, pay more net taxes.
What is this "thinking" people keep mentioning?

What will people do during the remaining 7.9h?
They might have integrated several third party libraries with licenses that prohibit distribution of source code.
Sales teams can be asinine to deal with. I don't think cloudflare realises how damaging this is for them long term.
I'm not sure how you are measuring "size", but I was going on features.

Though I haven't done a formal review of which features are open and closed, and the xompany doesn't appear to document it anywhere, so I may be wrong. It seems like when I have looked into it in the past mostly it is a core framework with a few open source apps and whole bucnh of closed ones and the marketing doesn't clearly state what is open and closed.
> Seems they are violating The Privacy Act of 1974 [...] I say seems, because even though they aren't a federal agency, they should be held to the same standard at a minimum.

"It seems you just committed criminal perjury! I say seems, because even though you aren't lying under oath in a court of law, you should be held to the same standard at a minimum."

No, dangit, "seems" is not some kind of magic word to bridge objective reality with a daydream.
> and i disagree that a company can get as big as google if everyone involved was wealthcapped at $10mm. There'd be no real reason to seek ever-higher profits, especially if every company was forced to abide these rules.

As it is many of these companies are predominantly owned by index funds and pension funds, i.e. the retirement savings of ordinary people, with a net worth of e.g. $200,000 rather than $10,000,000. But they'd rather it be $250,000, wouldn't they? So the incentive remains.

> as an aside, isn't it weird that during the high fuel prices in the last 4 years the fuel producing companies have made record profits?

That's not weird, it's how supply and demand works. When demand is higher than supply, anyone who can provide supply makes a lot of money. That's the incentive for anyone who can to increase the amount of supply they can provide, until the price comes back down and increasing supply is no longer profitable.

But OPEC is a cartel, and cartels artificially constrain supply. This is why monopolies are bad.
Better to have a company than not have one right?
This explains what the 80386 lacked that was a large part of what made it simpler to stop supporting 80386 entirely and make 80486 the minimum for gcc:

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20190404-00/?p=10...
nickstinemates already beat you to it [1]

[1] https://keeb.dev/static/login.mp4
Did you even read the article?

"The increase in diagnoses also comes amid growing awareness of ADHD — and the different ways that it can manifest in children. Danielson says that may help explain why girls are becoming more commonly diagnosed with ADHD compared to boys than they had been in the past. She says boys have long been diagnosed with ADHD at around two and half times the rate of girls, but the new reports finds that difference is narrowing."
I’m flabbergasted.

They haven’t found a way start doing it already?
Young's literal translation is pretty good for those who don't read Koine Greek or otherwise aren't eager to break out a copy of Strong's concordance. It's interesting to see the minor difference between "a root" and "the root" for example:

9 and those wishing to be rich, do fall into temptation and a snare, and many desires, foolish and hurtful, that sink men into ruin and destruction,

10 for a root of all the evils is the love of money, which certain longing for did go astray from the faith, and themselves did pierce through with many sorrows;
AI models have favorite numbers, because they think they're people
I feel that something happened at Google gradually and over the past few years but did happen.

They initially paid a lot of money to hire the best and brightest minds, they created crazy algorithmic interviews and a lot of hoops and became known as the place where the best went.

Then it got inverted that the best go to Google so if you were at Google you were the best. Which led to people optimizing for the money.and optimizing to get into google. The problem was what was once a singal and a filter then became an objective and a goal.

Overtime the organization crew and people left due to culture changes from being a scrappy startup to being a F50 company, or retiring or just wanting something new.

The problem was the best and brightest had put together systems that couldn't be maintained by those that weren't also fantasticaly competent, after debugging is twice as hard as coding and all that, and so slowly over time the whole house of cards is rotting slowly overtime as more and more problems accumulate but the individuals left aren't competent enough to fix them or address them, and I don't just mean at the engineering level but the whole stack from engineering to upper management.

The Goths showed up sacked Rome for its wealth and treasure but can no longer keep the grain coming and the fountains running.
It's a resilient, hyperscale distributed system. Just like humanity.
HSTS is a note to the browser to insist on TLS when hitting a website. It is sent as a header, with a timescale, regardless of http/https.
I've never uploaded pictures of myself to Facebook, other than a few profile pictures, so you'd think I'd be in the clear, right? I doubt it. My friends have uploaded pictures with me to FB. I never authorized Facebook to use my image in my friend's pictures to train AI. I never authorized FB to use my friends to manually train FB's classifier by tagging the pixels representing me with my name. Yet here we are.
I suppose that depends on one's global utility function.
I’ve known folks in NH this has happened too. One of the only real taxes NH has is a property tax so it keeps going up. Folks who’ve owned their place forever suddenly can’t afford it. Most of them are old so they’re on fixed incomes or they’re woodchucks who do odd jobs/labor to get by.

Just for comparison: I live just outside of Boston. My property taxes for my house are roughly the same as my parents in NH. Even though my house is worth 5x as much.
It will continue until either Putin is no longer in power, or until RU is pushed back to its borders. Russia implements Lenin's approach: "We probe with bayonets, where we find mush, we press on, where we find steel,we withdraw.". The West has so far provided mostly mush and insufficient & overly constrained steel (e.g., short range and can't hit targets in RU so self-creating a safe zone for Putin). When the West steps up to win, it will end. If it doesn't, we'll be fighting more expensive wars on NATO territory, the Baltics, Poland, Finland, and more.
Sure, for the beneficiaries.
The opt-out form on Instagram has a "Send" button that pops up a dialog saying it's sent an email, please enter the code in that email to submit your opt-out. But after trying multiple times, no email has arrived. Oh, what a fucking convenient breakdown of your systems, Zuck.
I stopped using Facebook in 2012, and "deleted" my account in 2016.

I would bet good money that they still have everything I ever posted in their databases (with a "deleted" flag set), and that there is absolutely no way for me to reject consent for them to use all of that to train their bullshit engines.
> in helping dictators evade sanctions

Let's be realistic here, most of dictators evading sanctions do it (i) with good ol' bags of $/€/CHF/£, (ii) gold/platinum/diamonds/..., (iii) whatever ad-hoc currency satisfies the two parties (promises, shares, goods, ...); in short everything but traceable-in-the-open digital currencies where most of the in/egress feature mandatory KYC.

If you believe e.g. that the US/EU firms still doing business in Russia are doing it in ETH/BTC, I have a port in Serbia to sell you.
HSTS is intended for browsers. For API clients the correct behavior (following curl's lead) is probably to never follow/make any redirects by default.
I also love salt. Fuck I love it.
I would imagine that for some games there is still a lot of money to be made making the most out of 95-year copyright lengths, and while open sourcing games per se is definitely not a relinquishment of copyright, it could affect the profitability of further monetizing those games by relinquishing some control. For example, Nintendo has re-released its retro games in various ways; I have a Super Nintendo Classic I purchased in Japan in 2017 with about 20 retro Nintendo games, and Nintendo made classic Pokémon games available on the Nintendo 3DS for some time before closing the online store for that platform.

Now, granted, there is a huge online community that does ROM hacks and disassembly, but Nintendo has been known to aggressively defend its IP (see the shutdown of the Yuzu project, for example). As a big fan of classic Pokémon games it would be cool to see a sanctioned source code release of these games, but I just don’t see it happening; there is too much money to be made re-selling classic Pokémon games in a “Disney vault” or subscription (Disney+) fashion until the copyright expires.
R's evaluation of arguments is lazy, so while not at the level of Haskell it feels like a lazy language to me. Try eg:

f = function(x) { print('hello'); x }
f(print('world'))

X is not evaluated in f until referenced. Indeed if you remove x from f, world is not printed.
And/or he wants a greater glut of degree holders to drive down employment cost further.
When I heard about this I sent the note below to legal@fb.com.

--

To: Meta / Facebook

Re: AI training

I am a user of your platform in <Country>.

I’ve recently been given to understand that you plan to start utilizing my personal data (photos, posts, etc) to train your AI models. I am writing to make it clear that I DO NOT consent to this use of my information.

I tried to find a setting on your website to “opt out” and have been unsuccessful.

Be advised if you utilize any of my data for training without my consent, I will litigate to the full extent of the law, including seeking an order to compel the destruction of any resulting models, weights, data, source code, etc. that has been generated from it. Should such an order be granted it could be a very expensive consequence for Meta given the likely size of the resulting dataset that would have been “tainted” with inputs from my personal data.

Further, I strongly advise you make this an “opt in” process for users – in addition to mitigating your legal risk, it’s simply the right thing to do. Expecting that you already somehow have permission for such an invasive use of your users’ data and constructing the feature as “opt out” is, frankly, contemptible.
Was also looking for something like this - I can't find pricing listed anywhere for their API usage, only the free 1,000 credits - or am I completely misunderstanding how this works?
It’s a bit sad to position yourself as a magnet for the gullible though.
I did the same thing. My daily use averaged 24 miles and 110v worked just fine.

Since then, batteries have gotten bigger, I have a 220v charger than can easily fill the large battery overnight with cheaper power, many parking garages have chargers, and high speed fast chargers have become commonplace.

I kind of wonder if the people purchasing cars for these theoretical events have a first aid kit in their car, emergency food in the house, or savings for a few months out of work.

I think getting a older big gas SUV with plenty of storage space is a good backup. You can haul things too big or dirty for your EV, use gasoline when electricity for some reason doesn't work, and haul around a big family visiting from out-of-town.
You can also lend it to the people who don't understand EVs.
Why would anyone create an account 4 years ago just to use it on a copy of someone else's comment...?
We have arguably more basic layer of abstractions which can help to derive the Maxwell equations. That is basic existence of charge (and vacuum properties - permittivity and permeability), theory of relativity (the special one) and math, which allows derivation of Gauss's law, Faraday's law, Amper's law. So if for somebody it's easier to understand the constant nature of the speed of light, he can explain Maxwell's equations from that.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/DEFdtvFKev54LW5M7

Not necessarily.
Nobody has seen any AGI so far. As far as I am concerned, right now it is just a scarecrow used by sociopaths like Altman et al to promote their self-interests.
> may as well be a traditional database with a "sessions" table.

Isn't that kind of the point though? I'm not saying JWTs are a better answer for logout, only that JWTs can still support logout and they both similarly require a database transaction.

If logout can work either way, and in all likelihood logout isn't a performance concern as long as its secure, you may have other use cases and requirements in an app that do make JWTs a better fit.

I still don't understand how the argument here can be that there are no cases for JWTs, or that the list of "its" in the original article can be bulletproof no matter what else is going on in a project. That's unnecessarily absolute and leaves no wiggle room for competing priorities and constraints.
Lame half measure. Delete your account instead.
ChatTTS-Best open source TTS Model
Google 2010 was a very different place from Google 2014, I only imagine it’s got worse.

When I started in 2010 managers had IDEs and could discuss code, it didn’t matter if I came in at 11AM because I was there until 9PM and got the work done of 10 engineers (and led a bigger team)

In 2014 is when other middle managers started pulling rank instead of letting data and facts win, suddenly being in at 9AM was important, suddenly programming skill was less important then brown-nosing, moronic death marches started as the B level,“yes men” programmers were hired, who were too scared to question authority and think for themselves.

So I left and started my first company, best decision ever, but I imagine Google has got worse internally, especially seeing their laughably poor AI search results of late
I'm amazed that they were able to get a human at Google to acknowledge this in the first case.
been using savvy for a bit - shantanu gave me early access!

love how simple it is to use, personally been loving the savvy ask/explain in the last couple of weeks - been super easy to ask questions in the terminal and just get answers

but the history is quite good too, very cool to share notebooks with others on the team
SCAM, stay away.
Nope, I tried it for graph and diagram understanding and it wasn't good enough. Planning to repeat the evaluation with 4o when I have time.
Being over 40.
Something interesting I realized about their choice of name - S7.

1. It's a combination of S3 and S4 obviously.

2. It's also linked to another OOP system called R6. Interesting how it's a step forward one way (6->7) and a step 'backwards' in another way (S->R).

To me it shows the philosophy of not creating something entirely new but improving the existing systems quite nicely!
Yea I figured -6 was superfluous but I put it in because another commenter made a big deal out of ping vs ping6 (a distinction that's been gone in Arch for a while).

I do have a link local address directly on that NIC. I also use VLANs sometimes, but none are configured right now on this link. Slightly edited below to hide my MAC but:

$ ip -6 address show dev eth2 | grep link
inet6 fe80::aef0:b837:fafa:fefe/64 scope link noprefixroute

The same command works fine on my Debian and OpenWRT boxes, but not on my Arch desktop.
That's been posed many times*. What's new here is version 0.9.0

* https://hn.algolia.com/?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ftinygra...
They have no internal realization of what happens when they turn off large enterprises. They accidentally turned off a $10bln retailer that I’m aware of too. Whoops!
We just initialize a random latent vector for each model, and then jointly train each of these unique latent vectors :)
> they'll just use what they have on hand. And everyone has guns.

That is exactly what I am worried about. I consider that to be pretty bad situation for the orca. One which they have no way to anticipate. And as you say that is the “simplest” solution so that is the most likely one to be employed if someone becomes aggitated.

> … but probably not kill them

That part I don’t know about. I suspect getting shot is pretty dangerous. There is some chance of it killing the orca within minutes (if it hits their brain or a major blood vessel), but i agre that the probability of that is low. Then there is the chance of it slowly killing the orca (either because the wound gets infected or because it interferes with their hunting/feeding such that the animal starves to death.)

All around I would like to very much avoid this outcome.
Luigi Federico Menabrea
An organic framework for electrocatalytic production of ethylene from CO2
Sounds good but feel like theirs something slightly off to the cadence of the voice in the sample, but maybe i'm imagining
Theil want you to drop out. https://thielfellowship.org/
Study Reveals Differences in Brain Structure for Older Autistic Adults
Excited to try it. How does it do with privacy? Are my runbooks used to train any models?
Besides pitching Joist, going through OP, I'm not following how verbose the nested examples would get, i.e. ProductLoadBundle is loading "products & widgets".

But what if I need "products & widgets & widget orders". And like sometimes I want "just products & widgets" (2 levels) and sometimes I want "products & widgets & widget orders (3 levels)"?

Would these be the same "ProductLoadBundle" with some conditionals to the Product.LoadBundle method? Would the result of those conditionals be seen in the type-safe as, i.e. sometimes the 3rd level is available, sometimes it is not?

Or would it be two separate bundles, a 2-level Product.LoadTwoLevelBundle and a 3-level Product.LoadWidgetsAndOrdersBundle, which has the pro of better type-safety, but a con of repeating the bundle boilerplate for each unique shape/tree of data your app needs to load.

My guess/hope is that it's the 2nd, if only because I assume brandur also values type-safety over verbosity.

It took me awhile to find again, but this OG scala library in theory handled these adhoc shapes (called "enrichments" in their readme) somewhat elegantly:

https://index.scala-lang.org/getclump/clump

Mea culpa another Joist pitch, but TypeScript makes this "give me an adhoc type based on the call-site specific tree of data" super-pleasant, i.e. Loaded<Product, "widgets"> vs. Loaded<Product, { widgets: "orders" }> gets you the two different 2-level vs. 3-level types.

...granted, you just have to accept non-Go/non-native levels of performance., but tradeoffs. :-)
I’m gonna side with sama here. Toner and others who voted to fire are type of people who spend their entire career in meetings and political maneuvering and not a single day actually delivering results.
to late thread got flagged
You'd be surprised how many are in the industry who didn't - yet? - get burned or don't consider it good enough reason to change.
Connect with recruiters on linkedin, ask them for a quick call / info interview.

Be precise on the role you’re interested in and make sure your linkedin profile matches.