skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Among the sailing cruisers, it's become clear this is not a factor. Sailing vessels have been attacked with their propellors on brake, with their props disengaged or with props running.

In general, marine mammals don't mind the sound of engines (even though I do!) We have had pods of dolphins swimming along and playing around our boat in all configurations. I once turned off the engine when the dolphins came around, and they left immediately, presumable because we lost too much speed to be interesting? That genuinely surprised me, as I like sailing for the quiet.
We don't need passwords, everyone just needs to be nice to each other
Hacker News has become a bizarrely censored place on the internet. This is a huge hacking story and it’s been flagged and removed from the front page all day.
JS executables with deno or bun aren’t terribly different from pyinstaller executables. Of course they’ve been made more convenient by being bundled with the toolchains.
People really tie their brains in knots trying to justify iPad OS.

It's terribly limited -- a lot of the software people use regularly cannot run on it, and it also does not allow various typical workflows.

> so maybe it should be able to run MacOS... Their vision isn’t very clear the more one thinks about it

Come now. I think it's only unclear if you plug your ears and say "La, la, la, la!" loud enough.

We all get it: fat fingers can't hit small click targets like a mouse pointer can. Some apps really need a physical keyboard. So go into "iPad mode" when a pointing device and keyboard isn't connected, which can be similar to the current iPadOS interface. Or perhaps make use of some of the nice assistive technologies that are already in macOS. Point is, there are solutions, and no one said the macOS side of it couldn't be optional.
> It would be much better to just publish a good knowledge base.

Yes, but a lot of companies seem to institutionally incapable of doing so. The number of FAQ pages (or worse, FAQ apps) I've come across filled with questions that no human has ever asked about a product, but instead list all the questions that the marketing department wished people would ask about their product because the answers paint it in such a good light, is astonishing.

The trouble with an actual knowledgebase that helps people who are struggling to use your product, is that it broadcasts to the world the ways in which your product is hard to use. And that just doesn't look good. So that info is either not published at all, or made deliberately hard to find, in order that people can't figure out where the warts are.
People in stores don’t calculate. People who buy software do. Like actual calculations: $10 / month / user * 100 users

In a store people often don’t even look at the price, just”I see cheese. Oeh, LESS than $3?”

Completely different target group
How Much Is a Memory Worth?
The important thing was that I had a salmon on my head, which was the style at the time. They didn't have any pink salmons, because of the humans. The only thing you could get was those decaying yellow ones...
At least as of 10-15 years ago US Cellular owned their rural markets and leased their urban markets. In NYC they are likely reselling Verizon’s network.
Yes, I need a green thing to show you a green. But you are looking at a green when you view the green thing. I can show you “big” but cannot show you two bigs because big is a comparison of the size of two things. Size is a property of a thing (and yes, I can show you two sizes).
Yes, but thanks to leverage you have effectively created higher returns for your retirement portfolio than you would have been able to without the leverage.
No worries, I have to keep this stuff lighthearted or I'd go crazy.. :-D

But yes, you make a good point. My mind automatically paraphrased the question more as "What languages are programming languages implemented in?" but that's not really what you were saying.

To add a little extra value here, https://dbdb.io/stats is a site I quite like that is a "database of databases" and maintains stats on the languages used to implement them. C++ and Java far in the lead!
They can, but I think it is missing the other component. Housing alone in a vacuum is not going to. Its not a case of, build houses and they will come. You also need other things that attract people. Jobs, activities, amenities, restaurants, etc. But yes, if building more dwellings in Detroit along with building other things people want make Detroit more attractive to someone who would have moved to San Francisco instead, it can alleviate housing demand in San Fransisco. Which is what some of these places should be gunning for.
It helps you if you set up a tunnel back to your location. I have a /48 tunneled back to my home network over wireguard. There are several RIPE LIRs that will guide you through this, even if you're in the US. (You'll need a VPS in the EU to satisfy the contractual requirements. Your other VPSes can be closer to you.)
OpenAI training its next major AI model, forms new safety committee
We have no definition of reasoning that is sufficiently precise to be useful.

But we do have a bunch of benchmark tasks/datasets that test what we intuitively understand to be aspects of reasoning.

For AI models, "being able to reason" means "performing well on these benchmarks tasks/datasets".

Over time, we'll add more benchmarking tasks and datasets that ostensibly test aspects of "reasoning", and people will develop models that succeed on more and more of these simultaneously.

And these models will become more and more useful. And people will still argue over whether they are truly "reasoning".
As far as I know, people have always practiced/learned alphabets by reciting/writing them one-by-one, in the "standard order", over and over again. We did it ourselves at school, too. Maybe that's why it's so retained - we just can't imagine any other order :) And authors of new alphabets were probably already versed in other alphabets and had to learn their "standard order".
isn't google fi using t-mobile network as the backbone?
The 5% is a sliding window. Some of those have just opened up, some of those are about to close at any given time. And it also represents all buildings, from super in demand complexes to slower moving listings, and is a rule of thumb that also aggregates seasonal differences.

In aggregate, 5-7% seems to be a sweet spot where landlords can find tenants in a reasonable amount of time and tenants are not scrambling to send out a dozen applications a week.
Pretty telling you directed that at my comment rather than the absolute horseshit comment I responded to.
there are a lot of non-native speakers employed in the callcenter business.
To all manufacturers: More plug-in hybrids, please!

A smaller battery with a range of 40-100 miles would allow most people to do their daily driving strictly on battery. Beyond that, a gas/diesel generator should kick in for range extension (or for towing).
I also love not having prime.
The issue is really forwards compatibility. Every ipv4 address should've been kept valid in all ipv6 networks.

Step 1 would've been to leave all the routing, DNS, NAT, DHCP etc as-is and just get people's devices speaking ipv6. And we would've already been there years ago. Once that's done, DNS and DHCP can be updated, then people can start using the extended address space by splitting up their blocks. So if you previously had 1.2.3.4, you now also have 1.2.3.4.1 etc.

It's actually not too late to do this with the existing v6 header.
Meanwhile:

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/932846/download?inline
That's working with assumption that I am sitting and doing nothing else. Usually I am watching those long videos on the TV while working instead of listening to music.

Then you could rephrase it as "millions of people are watching TV several hours a day" Are they watching the TV, or just having it switched on while doing other chores so there is no "silence" when they will occasionally stop?
I'm not entirely sure why this is a problem. Nothing's stopping you from using f-droid as an app source as well as some other store - it doesn't need to cover every use case. It's already a viable alternative for apps which can't go on the Play Store due to Google's policies, like AdAway, NewPipe and Termux.

The fact there's no freedom respecting bank applications is a problem on its own, though. I will continue avoiding them until there is...
Any shallow decision tree where the nuance doesn't matter.

An example might be:

There's something wrong with my order -> wrong size -> order not shipped -> update size on order to small -> small out of stock -> cancel or backorder

or

There's something wrong with my order -> wrong size -> sorry, the order already shipped -> start a return

You can argue that these kinds of things should be supported via direct web UI, and that's fine, but I've seen them backed by chatbots, and I would rather do it on the web than make a phone call for a boring decision tree.
I’m not against people being billionaires if they pay a fair share of their wealth in taxes every year. The reality in America is that the tax system is lopsided.

Even in the lowest tax brackets, workers still have to deal with payroll taxes. On the other hand, if your income is derived from investments, you escape payroll taxes __and__ you pay less in capital gains taxes than you would in normal income taxes. In other words, we pay a higher share of our income that we earn from doing actual work than many billionaires do on passive income.

Not to mention all the loopholes tailor-made for billionaires and corporations.

Anyways, regarding the mechanics of trickle-down economics, concentrating more wealth in the hands of the wealthy is, from a morally neutral “let’s just grow our GDP” standpoint, bad for the economy. Folks who already have everything they need/want may, given a few more billion dollars, buy a mega yacht here or make a trip to space there, but most of it will be hoarded away or, worse, used to influence policy so they can rake in more billions. If you spread those billions among the less wealthy, they’re more likely to go out and spend it on necessities, which puts more money in the hands of people who need it, and so on. The faster that money circulates, the more GDP grows.

Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velocity_of_money

It’s shocking how many Americans can be persuaded to hand over their hard-earned money and worship the thieves at the same time. As if they’ll somehow be getting that money back.
It works offline, though.
If you trust Sam I feel bad for you
It seems Lima also wants to run containers, but using containerd:

> The key difference is that Colima launches Docker by default, while Lima launches containerd by default.

https://lima-vm.io/docs/faq/colima/
Because I use a custom ergonomic 3D printed keyboard due to RSI and do the vast majority of my work at my desktop computer. I love the iPad for being able to do touch focused tasks and the extreme portability. Every once in a while I like to code remotely or even outside. Blink shell connected to my dev server over ssh and neovim allow me to work on the ipad pretty seamlessly. I don't have to buy yet another device that I will only use once or twice a month, and I don't have to put my custom keyboard on top of an existing keyboard built into the device.

It may seem like a weird setup but it really works for me. I put my ipad on a folding stand to boost the height closer to eye level and it's so much more ergonomic than what I used to have with my 15" Macbook Pro.
60 cycle hum probably would not work, europe uses 50hz
I never claimed its aim was to fund or incentivize housebuilding - in fact not only was NAMA emblematic of the overall government policy to restrict supply in order to re-bolster its portfolio of residential housing in deep negative-equity, it also played a significant role in worsening the housing crisis through its sale of assets to real estate investment trusts (REITs).
https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/housing-crisis-why-nama-s...

You can think back a decade as you say, but your recollection isn't in accordance with the recorded protests at the time
https://www.independent.ie/news/protesters-call-for-nama-fun...

Dr Rory Hearne's research from Maynooth sums it up brilliantly

"The housing crisis has also been caused by wider government policy from 2010 to encourage the entry of global investors and vulture funds (via various tax incentives, lobbying and fire sale of assets) into Ireland in order to offload toxic loans from NAMA and the banks. Rising house prices and rents post 2013 were also viewed positively and were promoted as an enticement to investors, while rising prices and rents were also viewed positively for rehabilitating the balance sheets of the banks, a core aim of all policy post 2008. The impact on the housing system was not considered an issue, despite myself and others highlighting the potential problems.

We can see now that these policies have contributed directly to the crisis with vulture funds hoarding land purchased from NAMA. Vulture funds are more likely to repossess houses in mortgage arrears and raise rents on buy to let properties (for example, Ireland's biggest landlord Ires Reit has raised rents substantially). The increase in investors purchasing homes means they are competing with potential home owners. We need to cool off this speculative inflow of investors into our housing system (investors bought up to a fifth of all homes in 2017) and extend the vacant sites tax to derelict property and increase it further to force either sale or development."
https://www.maynoothuniversity.ie/research/spotlight-researc...
You blamed the blight of sanctuary cities on Republican states.

The fact illegal immigration is rampant is the source of the problem, not Republican states. It's a cherry picked statement with an agenda.
A QC that can't run Shor's algorithm is not a QC, as much as D-Wave screams and stamps their feet that it's not fair.
Situation C happens all the time. I guarantee it 1000%, it's the vast majority of chats/calls/emails for many things.

I did phone support for pretty advanced technology things (you had to be pretty involved in IT to even have one of these) and still a decent number were fixed by "read the FAQ, do steps 1 and 2."
Well in big orgs people get shuffled around teams so even if you joined a team that is aligned with the way you feel things should be done you might end up in totally different env. after a period of time.
Let me add a little context: the use case is mostly support when people are facing infra issues

And "preferrable" meant it was preferrable to developers specifically, which based off of my experience nobody wants it there, it's an annoyance at best

Whether it saves cost or not: hiring people to manage the automated thing (including aforementioned bullshitter who is most likely expensive) or cheap front line support, I'm not sure
>There is no textbook or tutor helping them do this either it should be noted.

For this particular paper there isn't, but all of the large frontier models do have textbooks (we can assume they have almost all modern textbooks). They also have formal proofs of addition in Principia Mathematica, alongside nearly every math paper ever produced. And still, they demonstrate an incapacity to deal with relatively trivial addition - even though they can give you a step-by-step breakdown of how to correctly perform that addition with the columnar-addition approach. This juxtaposition seems transparently at odds with the idea of an underlying understanding & deductive reasoning in this context.

>There is a form of generalization if it can derive an algorithm based on a maximum length of 20 digit operands that also works for 120 digits. Is it the same algorithm we use by limiting ourselves to adding two digits at a time? Probably not but it may emulate some of what we are doing.

The paper is technically interesting, but I think it's reasonable to definitively conclude the model had not created an algorithm that is remotely as effective as columnar addition. If it had, it would be able to perform addition on n-size integers. Instead it has created a relatively predictable result that, when given lots of domain-specific problems, transformers get better at approximating the results of those domain-specific problems, and that when faced with problems significantly beyond its training data, its accuracy degrades.

That's not a useless result. But it's not the deductive reasoning that was being discussed in the thread - at least if you add the (relatively uncontroversial) caveat that deductive reasoning should lead to correct conclusion.
Our intention is not to recover the 13 weeks of pay, but we would rather let them keep it, and remove them from the company being that's the "pay out" they get for their shares.

Although, we are trying to understand if this could be considered as fraud so we can remove them with a legally solid reason, and confiscate their shares.
It’s a public safety issue. Do you also realize that the working class get out on boats to fish and partake in leisure activities?
Yeah these buzzwords are very useful pointers to wikipedia pages with details on what problems are in which complexity class and what are not.

I'm more familiar with cryptography so the most famous problem in BQP for me is discrete logarithm. Once you have this primitive, the following things are very clear:

1. How Shor's algorithm for factorization works: it consists of a classical algorithm that reduces factorization to calculation of group order of an element (which is a special case of discrete logarithm), then uses a quantum computer to solve the group order problem. This breaks RSA.

2. Breaking elliptic cryptography: Modern elliptic cryptography constructs an elliptic curve (in the form of y^2=x^3+Ax+B) and defines multiplication on top of the points on the curve. It turns out that multiplication is very easy but discrete logarithm is hard and that hardness is used to prove that Diffie-Hellman key exchange is hard to break, but what if it's not? Moreover, elliptic curves usually only have 256~512 bits since it's sufficient to guarantee security in the classical case, compared to RSA with 2048~4096 bits. While it's harder to break elliptic curves using classical methods, it turns out to be even easier for quantum computers.

What quantum computers is NOT is a parallel computer with 2^n threads running in parallel that would collapse to the thread that gives the correct results. This would imply BQP=NP which is not known to be true and however many qubits we build it won't be any more likely to become true.
What safety violation would be possible, inside the classroom? Fights in the hall, ok, but they could keep the phone on their backpack. But inside the classroom with the teacher present?
> Sometimes they can serve as a useful intake system for collecting information before passing someone off to an agent, but even then they tend to be less useful than just filling in a form. I think in most cases, a step by step form followed by a live chat would be better.

A phenomenal amount seem to collect useful identifying information, and then the agent ... asks you for the same information again? I don't know why.
I mean...you say it's the opposite of the old TV model, but it comes to the same result, doesn't it?

Before, the networks were king and viewers had to put up with what shows they decided to run.

Now, Google is king and viewers have to put up with what video creators they are both willing to platform, and palatable enough that they put their stuff on YouTube.

There will always be some viewers willing to follow a creator or show they like, in both of these scenarios (eg, when Buffy the Vampire Slayer moved from the WB to UPN in 2002), while others can't or won't—but there's much more difference, now, between moving from YouTube to, say, Vimeo than there was in the cable TV era moving from one channel to another, so long as you actually had that channel. (For some, these differences will not matter, and they may even claim they don't meaningfully exist; for others, they will be dealbreakers.)

...And I also agree that aftbit is being unfair with the cat videos remark. Google wants YouTube to be the place people go to watch videos on the internet, period. (Aside from, perhaps, porn.) That not only means that they get all your ad-watching eyeball time, it also means they get to control the narrative. Cat videos and shitty listicles are fantastic for Google, because they're an easy dopamine hit for viewers, but they absolutely want to be hosting more in-depth and controversial content, too. They just want to have unquestioned final say over what's actually allowed to be there, which sometimes means they'll remove things in order to make Russia happy, so Russia doesn't try to block Google/YouTube and replace them with a homegrown alternative.
Show HN: I'm working on a personal finance app with end-to-end encryption
Stop blaming developers and start blaming your organization for not taking accessibility seriously enough.

It takes a ton of review, SQA, and dev time to get this stuff right. Writing semantic HTML is just the tip of the iceberg. Nobody is an expert on it either no matter how well they've read WCAG and how much experience they have implementing it. It's a moving target and every page or app is different especially when there are any design or functionality changes. It's a team effort. You can't just dump all responsibility on devs.
People in hell want ice water.
Then the OP shouldn't blame the issues sanctuary cities face on Republican states. If illegal immigration is a problem for sanctuary cities, then that is what should be said.

It's not red vs blue to point out an attempt to shift blame on Republican governors.
https://archive.ph/6jgNL
I wouldn't trust anything coming from /e/ because of their horrible track record. For instance, a few years back, their cloud storage had a bug which leaked private files to other storage accounts[0]

[0] https://community.e.foundation/t/service-announcement-26-may...
The tl;dr version is encapsulated here; can't post an archive link as on the work VPN

https://thecurrency.news/articles/86599/we-had-our-chance-to...
I think Yahoo or HP would be the most likely candidates.

HP is at about a fifth of it's peak market cap, largely as a result of a similar play.

I'd short Google, but there's an old saying that markets can be irrational far longer than an individual wallet can sustain a short....
DHH discusses SQLite (and Stoicism) [video]
I wonder if any boats with a traditional long keel have been affected? I'd expect that arrangement to be even less attractive to an orca given there's no gap between the rudder and keel.
The VW ID.2all [1] looks promising. Too bad it will be delayed to 2026 or beyond [2].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_ID.2all

[2] https://www.reddit.com/r/electricvehicles/comments/18zbn0v/v...
Is the problem really the slip in the belt drive? I thought its just the motor driving it at a slightly wrong speed.
The single most important thing before you even think about metrics is periodic restoration tests.

If you're not doing that on a regular basis (and the test should include confirming that your system is actually functioning properly after restoration), that should be your first priority.
However, using the industry accepted term for the topic of the discussion is fine.
Single most important is probably two-gate error rates, until the fault tolerance threshold is crossed. Then things like connectivity and logical-qubit counts (where logical qubits are roughly proportional to physical qubits, but suppressed by an overhead that improves with lower error rates and implementation-specific factors).
That's a big enough discrepancy that the program could have heuristics to figure it out, particularly if the record player is in the right ballpark.

Also west Japan is 50, east 60.

The main problem is: (1) there isn't a lot of hum on professionally produced records; (2) but there may be hum from the equpiment itself.
Let me know when the efforts of Mobifree lead to something that will allow me to install mainline Linux.