skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I never got around to open sourcing them. But here's part of a dump of a .o file:

Section 14 .eh_frame PROGBITS,ALLOC,SIZE=0x0030(48),OFFSET=0x0040,ALIGN=8
offset = 00000000, length = 0x0014(20)
CIE_id = 00000000
version = 1
augmentation = 'zR'
code_alignment_factor = 1
data_alignment_factor = -8
return_address_register = 16
Augmentation_Length = 1
Address pointer encoding = DW_EH_PE_pcrel|sdata4
DW_CFA_def_cfa reg = 7, off = 00000008
DW_CFA_offset_10 off = 1
DW_CFA_nop
DW_CFA_nop
offset = 00000018, length = 0x0014(20)
CIE_pointer = 0000001c offset 00000000
augmentation = 'zR'
PC_Begin = 0
PC_Range = 6
Augmentation_Length = 0
DW_CFA_nop
DW_CFA_nop
DW_CFA_nop
DW_CFA_nop
DW_CFA_nop
DW_CFA_nop
DW_CFA_nop
0040: 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7a 52 0 1 78 10 1 .........zR..x..
0050: 1b c 7 8 90 1 0 0 14 0 0 0 1c 0 0 0 ................
0060: 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ................

Section 15 .data._D16TypeInfo_S3__C1S6__initZ PROGBITS,WRITE,ALLOC,SIZE=0x0090(144),OFFSET=0x0070,ALIGN=16
0070: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ................
0080: 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ................
0090: 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ................
00a0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ................
00b0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ................
00c0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ................
00d0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ................
00e0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ................
00f0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 33 5f 5f 43 31 53 0 ........S3__C1S.

Section 16 .rela.data._D16TypeInfo_S3__C1S6__initZ RELA,ENTRIES=3,OFFSET=0x06A4,ALIGN=8,LINK=8,INFO=15
0 offset=00000000 addend=0000000000000000 type=R_X86_64_64 sym=24 sym="_D15TypeInfo_Struct6__vtblZ"
1 offset=00000018 addend=0000000000000088 type=R_X86_64_64 sym=21 sym="_D16TypeInfo_S3__C1S6__initZ"
2 offset=00000070 addend=0000000000000000 type=R_X86_64_64 sym=25 sym="_D10TypeInfo_i6__initZ"

Section 17 .bss.__bzeroBytes NOBITS,WRITE,ALLOC,SIZE=0x0080(128),OFFSET=0x0100,ALIGN=16

Section 18 .group GROUP,ENTRIES=2,OFFSET=0x0100,ALIGN=4,LINK=8,INFO=23
0100: 1 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 ........

Section 19 .text.test PROGBITS,ALLOC,EXEC,GROUP,SIZE=0x0008(8),OFFSET=0x0108,ALIGN=4
0108: b8 4 0 0 0 c3 0 0 ........
This one seems silly but it will work if you put it where he's likely to travel. Or you get the local news to highlight it. It will likely cost you a bit of money.
> Total number of dwellings per thousand inhabitants, 2022 and 2011

The issue here is that demand shifts regionally over time. Dwelling units in Detroit don't satisfy demand in San Francisco. The result is that you continually have to increase supply in the places demand currently is. To keep prices flat, the number of units per thousand inhabitants has to increase over time, because the number of empty units in areas that have fallen out of demand will increase, but the high prices you're trying to avoid will be somewhere else.

> By definition, only investment properties can be underutilised - owner occupied homes are occupied!

This is also not true. You can have e.g. a 3-bedroom home with one occupant, even if the occupant is the owner. You can also certainly have underutilized land -- any single family home in an area where there is demand for more housing but zoning prevents it from being constructed on that piece of land. Because then you have that acre of land providing housing for one family when it could have been two or twenty.

> global asset price inflation driven by a broken financial system (i.e. a system being artificially pumped up with cheap credit).

This can only happen when supply is artificially constrained. If it cost $200,000 to add a housing unit and suddenly everyone can get a bigger loan than before, the instantaneous effect would be for housing prices to increase -- but once they're above the construction cost, construction occurs until they no longer are, i.e. until they fall back below $200,000.

At that point cheap credit might cause people to buy bigger houses, or use the loan money to buy things other than housing, but long-term you can't get the price of the same housing unit to increase above the cost of creating more of them, or supply would just increase until it fell back to that cost.

What you can do is increase the cost of creating supply, e.g. by restricting where it can be done, so that the cost of doing it goes up and with it the price of a given housing unit. Which is what has happened.
> Since alias records (a.k.a CNAME records) aren't permitted at the apex...

Technically this is a subset of the rule that CNAME ("canonical") records cannot co-exist with any other record type with the same label. e.g. it's illegal to have `foo.example.com` be both a CNAME and an A record. Since an SOA record is required at the zone apex, you can't also have a CNAME record there. :-(
While the other replies about the legality of walking away for a short period may or may not be valid, GP was talking about leaving their car charging while they go get a short meal with their family. You could probably get away with leaving your car at the gas pump that long at some gas stations, but if wouldn’t be a very considerate thing to do.
Stationery means more than just paper. I don't think there are any good synonyms for stationery, it's the only word with that exact meaning.

Same problem when someone wants to substitute "login" for "authenticate" - not synonyms.
The candidate screening process is usually performed by someone with no actual understanding of the job, e.g. a general recruiter. This used to be me. Somehow I was expected to recruit for electrical and pipeline design jobs, and electrical, chemical, mechanical, and HVAC engineering positions, for both on and offshore oil and gas, LNG, plants, platforms, everything. I vaguely remember there's a serious difference for mechanical engineers specialized in rotating and non rotating equipment, and my clients would get frustrated at me for sending the wrong type, so there's a naive filter: Ctrl f for "rotat." I was 22 years old with a creative writing degree and my previous job was an English teacher.

Getting past the recruiter and automated filtering software is a necessity for getting a good selection of offers (imo a good job hunt terminates with at least 3 offers that you can bid against each other). Even if one of them isn't necessarily the job you want, it's great to have another offer to increase urgency for the job you actually want, or to use to bid up rate.

I've never been questioned by hiring managers why I "lied" in a screening stage because the screening stage doesn't communicate with the interviewing stage. Everyone looks at the resume five minutes before the interview, they don't ask the recruiter what information the candidate put into the LinkedIn filter form.
Mate has about the same amount of caffeine as coffee. More even because of how it's consumed. You refill the hot water repeatedly, each infusion drawing more caffeine from the herb.
Have you talked to your users?
Frankly that's a perfect slogan for the whole LLM/GenAI marketplace.
Yes, I meant IPv4.

And rate limiting is very uncertain. If I limit per /56, users that have an entire /48 can outright bypass the rate limit. If I limit per /48, maybe I'll erroneously limit thousands of users whose ISP has all of them on the same /48.
I think this is a highly uncharitable response to someone clearly trying to speak humbly and honestly of their instinct towards a solution they obviously then recognized would be inappropriate.
CVE-2024-4978: Backdoored Court Conference App JAVS Apparent Supply Chain Attack
This what I don’t get about EV

If you live in suburban and commuting to downtown for work, large part of the driving would be high way. Having hybrid makes way more sense in this scenario.

If you live in downtown, you probably don’t need a car or you are parking in a underground parking lot that does not guarantee you a charging plspot
Google Online Security Blog: On Fire Drills and Phishing Tests
The short march to China's hydrogen bomb
Is np.flatten not a workable option in some cases?
You should try Exa.ai API
That's what blows my mind. A married couple in the midwest might make $130k combined and have 2 $60k cars in the garage.
I don't disagree, but FWIW, I've spent quite a bit of time studying theology, and Christian apologetics and YEC in particular. I actually ran a Bible study in conjunction with a local church for about four years. So I may have a little bit more leverage than you think.
Parents (many uninvolved, many demanding and unrealistic) and administrators (kowtowing to parents) grind teachers down until they leave.

I recommend no one be a teacher in the US. It’s mostly daycare for those who can’t homeschool or private school, for whatever reason.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40053774

(Search “parents” in r/teachers on Reddit for more, being a teacher in the US is a shit show; I have helped more than one teacher switch careers to save them from public education)
They have a book?
Zanzibar: Google’s Consistent, Global Authorization System

https://research.google/pubs/zanzibar-googles-consistent-glo...
What aspects of Zoom and Teams are frustrating for you?
I also noticed that. It recommended NVIDIA 5 times.
I've sold houses before. I hated every day it was sitting there sucking up money.

> Better to pass those fees

to whom?

> and borrow against artifically inflated value than it is to realize a loss.

Borrowing does nothing to stop one from losing money.

As for artificially inflated values, bank lenders are not stupid and are not going to loan against a phony value.
I've spent decades studying YEC and Christian apologetics. I even ran a Bible study for four years, and I was on the YouTube YEC debate circuit for a while. I don't know if that counts as "talking to my users" but I'm not going in to this cold.

In fact, the reason I wrote this installment in the series is because I know that apologists often cite the (alleged) "purity" of mathematical truth as evidence for the existence of God and I wanted to nip that argument in the bud.
What if you don't want to live in a city as dense as that?
We're definitely in some kind of next stage of urbanization where people are moving into the big cities even from smaller ones. It's very noticeable in the former Soviet states, but I believe it also happens elsewhere.
Sure, but electricity still isn't a great energy vector for mobile applications. A gas pump pumps at an equivalent rate of 3MW or so after accounting for thermal losses in the vehicle. To match that with electricity, someone is either dispatching capacity on demand, or you're already generating it and curtailing it, which puts to bed any arguments about efficiency.

Electricity only really exists in a transient state, and has to be stored in bricks made up of complex materials that are harder to scale than equivalent chemical storage mechanisms.

That's not the same thing as saying EVs have no place, because they clearly do, but I don't think that place is as a general replacement for a standard vehicle in societies that rely heavily on cars. I think they're a niche product there.
In life, some people look up, some people look down.

I'll never understand how someone could think that completely normal things like a house, garden, car, etc are somehow "too much". But they do. It's baffling.

I can understand, though not agree, with being angry with someone who owns say, tens of thousands of houses, millions of acres of land, and leaves it all empty.

But the idea that a house is underutilized if it doesn't have as many people as could possibly live in it? All I can say is, Hong Kong exists, Manhattan exists, feel free, I'm not in for that.
The effect is probably due to adding the chatgpt keyword.
They are the real owners. They aren't the original owners. Most items today don't lie with their original owners.

Proclaiming that because they didn't make it, they aren't the owners is hilarious and wrong. Even if they became owners through force.
I don't think the dating world maps that well to the job search world in that aspect. The only similarity between the two is I think high volume is a good idea. Playing the field.

I think you market yourself entirely different in both though. Job hunt you need to seriously talk yourself up, dating expects more subtlety and humbleness while selling yourself (well I guess depending on the kind of people you're trying to date).

Imo the strategy you're speculating on would never succeed because more than anything it would demonstrate lack of confidence.
And yet if they ponied up the money, that issue of "tainting" shared IPs suddenly goes away. You can bet CloudFlare would graciously give the gambling site as much time as they need to bring their own IP (they went out of their way to link third party sellers of IPs with dubious provenance, after all).
Is that a problem? It's a guest bedroom for every two houses. Something approaching the vast majority of all economic output goes toward things which are extraneous when measured against the historical median standard of living. But people like nice things. And a guest bedroom is a nice thing that some people like.
Don't expect to get a direct connection by calling his office. If he has, which he does, a good secretary he/she is likely to shield him from most people trying to contact him. I worked for a small company and it was a bear to get in contact with my company's CEO. That was a company with less than 200 employees. I suspect it would be next to impossible for a company with 1000's. Especially if he/she has no idea who you are.

Sometimes the office of the CEO has someone who acts on behalf of the CEO. They read letters that are sent to the CEO with problems and route them to the right people to get the problem fixed. If it's reasonable, this works sometimes since the request comes from the office of the CEO and no subordinate wants to get in trouble if it's a simple problem to solve.
The people who control Egypt now conquered it 1400 years ago and deliberately destroyed all the cultures that existed before them.

Ancient treasures created by those predecessor cultures are not owned by the people who destroyed the culture they come from. They literally have no connection. Not culturally, and to a large degree not even genetically.

It would be like saying that ancient Native American art is rightfully owned by the Kennedy family.

So that's the moral side.

On the practical side - what a terrible idea, to send irreplaceable ancient human cultural artifacts to be kept in such an unstable, low-trust society. They will not be good stewards. If we care at all about people in future centuries and millennia being able to see these objects, they need to be kept in the most stable countries.
Related demoscene prod from 2023:

https://github.com/robertmuth/M68000Demo

Live demo: https://art.muth.org/M68000
Even if the user is in control the machine can still be compromised. And since that data is available the data can be stolen.
Namviek – The open-source project manager for tiny teams
I think it is pretty safe to have doubts about Egyptian government profit projections. They also said the same thing about doubling the Suez canal but revenues did not meet projections and now they are planning to expand it again. https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/egypt-plans-expand-suez-c...
JWT is the simplest and most versatile authentication mechanism we have.

I have no idea why there is so much gaslighting about them. People keep pointing to implementation complexity, yet there exist proven, heavily used implementations for almost every language and engine imaginable. That issue is an issue of the past.

It is doubly ironic that people try to point to 'complexity' as an argument against them when most of them are addicted to over-engineered software stacks... JWTs are amazingly simple when compared to most other concepts in this industry.

The aversion towards JWT is weird. I used to think it's probably because some people got burned badly due to past implementation flaws and still hold a grudge... But the sheer persistence of the any-JWT movement leads me to think there may be an agenda behind it.

How could anyone possibly claim that keeping track of sessions on the back end and passing around session IDs is superior? It's way more expensive on the database/datastore, adds latency, it's hard to scale, you often end up with stale sessions because it's not fail-safe (e.g. how to clean up previously active sessions when a worker crashes? Especially if you have multiple workers.). Session IDs are MUCH more work.
I am so surprised that many parents are supportive of their kids having phones in school with the sole reason being communication in case of an emergency.

How do we expect kids to pay attention or be productive with a smartphone in their pocket? We are setting them up for failure - and by us I mean parents and school administrators who support kids having phones in class. Teachers are not in a position to change this.
Just FYI it's not the only Cleopatra's needle. The one on the Embankment, London has damage from zepplin raids.

There is a Tommy Handley radio sketch about the phonetic alphabet from the 1940s show "ITMA" which features "Klimpompidra's niddle" as the phonetic K, which begs the question "how do you spell that" which then recurses...
Most DDoS for hire services are on CloudFlare and they refuse to drop them. You're at least in the right ZIP code.
I wonder how many other structures exist during gestation that don’t survive past infancy in the common case. This seems similar to baby teeth in that we need them early in life but they are replaced with more permanent structures or in the case; needed during fetal development but not needed at all after birth.
Shhhh, Satya is making Google dance... watch and enjoy.

It's the "put Social into everything" FOMO -- and it's going just as well.
> They were one of those people…

I’m confused. Was it 1 person or a group of people?
> Cloudflare describes that policy as a commitment to content neutrality rather than extortion

But we know that's not true. Point out problems with a very controversial blogger and they'll cancel your service.
Much of that are involves forests far away from where people would want to live anyway. Often without roads.

When people say the issue is land, that usually implies a very particular smaller subset of land which is in proximity other populations, economic centers, and with certain features and infrastructure.
The problem is that you have to have working IPv4 in some form, because enough major sites (e.g. Twitter, Wordpress, Github, Pintrest, Vimeo, bit.ly, TikTok, Tumblr, the New York Times, but also mozilla.org and Archive.org) don't support IPv6. [1]

Likewise, some Linux mirrors don't support it. If I decide to try an IPv6-only server, and the first thing I see after "apt update" is network errors, I'm not very motivated to use IPv6 in the future.

Then add some problems where having IPv6 enabled randomly breaks things for one reason or another. I can either debug it forever, or turn the "internet is broken" switch (labeled "Enable IPv6") to "off" and get on with my day. That means more people that support IPv4 but not IPv6 (to be fair, this one seems to have gotten a lot better).

But ultimately, until some major, hard-to-avoid site says "we'll only be on IPv6", there is little reason for most to use it, and many reasons not to. That's why the transition takes forever.

[1] http://www.delong.com/ipv6_alexa500.html
I think that's an excessively intentionalist view of evolution. Evolution doesn't test the waters, in the sense that it inhibits a harmful mutation from happening again, nor are mutations likely to be purely good or bad; mutations are random changes, and are (definitionally) more likely to be passed on if they increase reproductive fitness, and that's about it.
I've had health issues for about 5 years, my back yard is a dense forest because I'm not outside editing it back to my preferences.

Trees definitely do not need us.
Having been on both sides of it, I have insight into it.

It's up to you if you want to defend that status quo of "cope with the life you've got - drugging yourself or paying expensive therapists if necessary to do so".

But it's important that others hear that there's another more effective way. That they can simply opt out of that tunnel vision, that they don't have to give in to the fear of disappointing others or "ruining the career" or just plain old fear of the unknown, and change their lives for the better.
Elon Musk's XAI Nets $6B for AI Supercomputer
SolidJS · Reactive JavaScript Library
Seems like there should be some sort of legal protection against being banned from nearly every shop. If it's just one shop owner who doesn't like you for whatever reason, you can go somewhere else, but if they're all sharing information and excluding someone, that's obviously bad. Perhaps this hasn't needed a law before because it was too hard for them all to coordinate on identifying everyone on their blacklist, but with facial recognition provided by a single vendor, it becomes a real risk.

This has been an issue with tenancy in my country. A tenant goes to the tenancy tribunal for any reason - even if it's the landlord's fault, and then all property managers, who collectively control most of the rental market, blacklist that person and suddenly they can't live anywhere.

With suing, the parties can already work it out among themselves if they both want to avoid going to court. I don't think it needs a mandated procedure. No-win-no-fee lawyers exist to serve poor people who have a clearly winnable case.
This is done in New Jersey as well .
Unless you can figure out a way to bill fetuses for capital projects, gonna have to go with a "nope!".

I know I'm being a little silly here, but this kind of thing is what you get with under-/post-/non-industrialized populations that crank their GDP from . . somewhere. Classic example are oil states[1], but it goes to some extent for the US as well, where our dominance results from the USD's reserve status[2], rather than any great vitality among the citizenry.

Anyway, when you don't really care about how well the citizens do, then . . why spend money getting them nice water? Especially if you've gone with professional, high tech militaries and all the state surveillance money can buy.

[1] Where the Maximum Leader is genuinely better off without pesky citizens, just (possibly foreign!) wage slaves to mine/pump and a chunk of loyal soldiers.

[2] I also have a personal theory, that started as a joke (and now it's not quite a joke anymore), called "The Blood Standard". How many people can your nation kill in 24 hours? This gives you a baseline for your foreign exchange. UU, Russia, China? They could probably kill a good chunk of the world's cities, so their currencies have a hard floor. Mexico or Brazil? Good frickin' luck.
At those distances, yes. I’ve gone through the certification process for even higher power units. IIRC you needed direct exposure of several minutes at much less than 1meter from the source to even begin to have risk.
That’s just like the Egyptian argument above. What are the Angles, aren’t they just part Roman?
6th of October (City)
I remember my grandfather talking about going to movies for a nickel, not because they had great films, but because they had air conditioning.
Black bear kebabs make family sick with parasitic worms
I don't understand the problem. Of course kids should have their phones at school! But that doesn't mean that they should be allowed to use them during class.

If kids are using their phone during class then you either confiscate the phone or kick the student out of the class. If they do it during a test you mark them down as cheating and fail them.

>How do we expect kids to pay attention or be productive with a smartphone in their pocket?

I think this is setting them up for the future, because in the future they are going to have a smartphone in their pocket at all times. They're going to have to learn to handle that eventually.

But in the pocket doesn't mean in hand.

Outside of class time though? It's nobody else's business what they do.