skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My worst grade in school was German. Then, after graduating and when working my third programming job, I've started learning it again and I realized I'm actually really good at human languages (learning words and reading came naturally to me). It's just a school environment which stopped me.
Hehe. Here's a cool FILE_ID.DIZ collection: http://www.roysac.com/fileid_col.html
Sorry. My reply to this are in the comments above. Thanks for posting, this is a nice read.

And also points out that the longer the distances involved the less critical time error is making mobile phone time of arrival viable.
I mean.. you would expect to see rings sometimes if this is a random noise kind of distribution no?
They accidentally deleted a customer's account somewhat recently [1][2][3].

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40313171

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40304666

[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40466810
Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) for Time Series Analysis
I read that if you have a business account then this limitation doesn't exist - but I've never had anyone send me a link that worked without a login
One problem is that when refactoring it's easy to make a monster like "if (!notX()) ..."
> My argument, from the beginning, was about maintainability from a company's perspective.

Better mansplaining than gaslighting I suppose. Your argument, from the beginning, was (quoted in full): “Reproducibility, on both client and server side. Easy to implement in pretty much all scripting and programming languages.”

None of your actual original argument, nor what you’re now claiming it was, nor the ones inbetween hold water.

It’s reproducible like every non-CS PRNG. It’s not simple, or simpler than alternatives. It doesn’t strike a “balance” between simplicity and being cryptographic (which is frankly a really weird thing to say; being cryptographic isn’t a spectrum). It’s not CS, and so it competes against the modern alternatives which are strictly simpler.

I mean I’m genuinely sorry that that you’re misinformed here, but that’s on you to reconcile. What’s the point in dying on this hill?

> You are aware that you don't need to mansplain the implementation to me, right?

If we’re being blunt and rude, it seems pretty obvious you did need this.

> Also you do realize I am not a user of MT, right?

In what way is this relevant?
For me personally, it's because I've been burned too many times by blog posts announcing that "feature X is here!", when in reality, it's only here in Chrome or behind a feature flag, or the exciting parts haven't been implemented yet. Even this blog post falls into the same trap. There isn't good cross-browser support for view transitions or anchor positioning, and yet they're listed as here now.
I'm pretty sure I'd regret oxygen faster than Zinc or Platinum but YMMV
> I can only imagine how frustrating it is for someone whose career is based on a single treatment to be faced with cases in which that treatment does not work. I could tell from the language she used, however, that in her mind, CBT does not fail her patients, but rather, some of her patients fail CBT.

This echoes my experience with CBT. [1] It turns out you can't treat autism or a brain injury with CBT as-is - but they don't screen for that.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36835266
Isn’t he known to not pay well his employees?
I remember around 15 years ago my brother told me he was lying down looking at the stars at night and saw a satellite. I didn't believe him at first, but confirmed that satellites can indeed be seen with naked eye sometimes. I later knew about the ISS and Iridium flares, but assumed it was a freak event to just see one by chance.

When looking for the aurora recently I was shocked to notice that you'll see multiple satellites within seconds of looking at the sky, during twilight, in a town with plenty of light pollution. People should take a look tonight. You don't need to see pictures like in the article to see how many satellites there are.
Time Warner AOL
One cant update an iphone if there is insufficient free storage, they may have very limited storage and there is no good way to manually move photos and videos to windows over usb or from icloud. People then end up deleting media one by one by hand while taking new pictures and making new videos. It can take a very long time. Most pictures are/feel more valuable than the update.
I record all meetings locally regardless of the tool with OBS. But that is only useful to me as I don't ask for authorization and not sharing them. It is only because I know my mind will sometimes drift and I want to be able to replay part of the meeting.

Having said that, so many people don't record meeting I or someone else can't attend. This is annoying. It should be automatized so that if you miss part or all of a meeting you can still watch the record as long as you were invited.
> TCC even implements array bounds-checking.

Optionally (command line option '-b') though and (somewhat perplexingly) only at run-time. The documentation hints at the run-time performance (and code size) impact.
>Collectively our team contributed some of the most widely used methods in the field,

So they hired some guys from other AI companies.
Elon is a megalomaniac who fancies himself an engineer (yes he used to be one, but his with then is oft disparaged)

Even if he had the best names in the industry attached, he would always put himself first.

I don’t think it’s wrong he’d do so either , because he has a cult of personality that would make him the biggest feature (positive/negative) of any company he is involved with.

Hence why I specifically only ask for other people on note here.
I don't have an answer either, but I've seen people who want to use bytecode/a VM using RISC-V just because it's well defined and tooling is already there. This has less to do with RISC-V hardware, or even really the fact that it's RISC-V, and more with using a simple bytecode and VM - e.g. JVM could also work there, but the Java ecosystem comes with what some people consider considerable pain.
For anyone interested, these days there are multiple people working on impressive stuff, sometimes it's even open source:

https://www.youtube.com/@GabeRundlett (open source engine in C++ with e.g. Rust bindings via C)

https://www.youtube.com/@DouglasDwyer (proprietary, using Rust and WGPU but interesting videos)

https://www.youtube.com/@xima1 (afaik proprietary, using WebGPU and typescript)

Open source stuff:

https://github.com/ria8651/alex (Rust)
https://github.com/davids91/shocovox (Rust)

There is a myriad more, many discords...
Cool. Will you pay the cost difference afterwards? I kinda don't like the taste of bugs.
Is the current studio system?
Related: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/56069/what-secu...
The Elon Musk Bubble, I really hope so. That’s so much capital and attention that could be spent on actual research instead of over-hyped and over-promised gimmicks
Ask HN: Anyone down for making a modular multi platform terminal?
tbh I am not sure about the whole terminal platform thing and the stacks I need to know for it, but I want to look for people working together for this project. tell me anything I need to know.
2% time is superficial review.

For a 40h all week job that is less than 1h

Not enough time to even understand the requirements of a 40h job.

10h would be
minimum.

Unless you are just checking that the style guide is correct and obvious
missed null checks.

For this reason I feel code
reviews are a bit silly and pair programming is way better (pairing with a mix of sync and async work) but that is an aside.

In addition a code review being short is usually because the coder and reviewer are both very competent. Once AI
enters the chat the reviewer needs to look very closely at every line.
Wait till they find a grouping of galaxies of a phallic shape.
UniSuper's Google cloud deletion traced to "blank parameter" in setup
Originally, Remind was supposed to be called Recall AI, a project I have been working on since last December. However, last week I was watching a video about the new Copilot+ laptops and noticed they featured the same functionality with the same name. So, I decided to open-source the project, rename it to Remind, and publish the landing page as quickly as possible. The reason I believe Remind will be better than other solutions is that it will be completely local, free, and private for users. I provided a demo, a link to the GitHub repository with all the code, and some information on how I implemented the solution. Since I launched it quickly, the site is obviously rushed, but you can check the public code—it is not a spyware at all. Although I'm just at the beginning, it already looks quite promising compared to existing paid and non-private solutions.
What is the edit window in hours?
> I know that there are problems with each of those companies, but to hate all of them seems like a pattern to me

Yeah, the pattern is that all these companies behave in ways so problematic that they generate hate. That shows the problem is with the companies, not the people who hate on them.

(If there's a problem with any people outside them, then that would be with the ones who don't hate on the companies. "Hey, just because all these plantations are based on slavery, what's with the hate on plantation owners?!?" That seem like something "good people" sould say, to you?)
Just in case why people are wondering why cutting of internet for an arctic island is a big deal.

What many might not know is that Svalbard is home to the northernmost satellite station in the world. It is just one of two stations that can communicate with polar orbiting satellites each day. ESA and NASA as well as other civilian organisations are present there, and the station communicates with well over a hundred satellites, and are pretty vital for much of the satellites that look back at us.
Supposedly if you scan the sky long enough, you'd find a copy of Shakespeare's play written in the stars.
It’ll be interesting to see how Apple markets this at WWDC. Will they explicitly say that OpenAI is powering this functionality?
Deepmind ,which was probably the top dog in cutting edge AI before openAI, was solving protein folding
Using Firefox you can use the PIP mode to put the presentation wherever you want at any size.
Wallos: Open-Source Personal Subscription Tracker
The fun part here is that most allocators already keep the size of the chunk within the header of the chunk, before the pointer they return to the caller of malloc(3). (Yes, jemalloc does not, it keeps the size info in a different way.) BTW I mentioned this as a master's graduation project, not a realistic way forward, because, well, it's not needed.

I'd say that C will lose relevance slowly, more and more, as much as Zig will gain relevance, hopefully to the point of becoming the default choice, and having key parts of Linux kernel ported to it. Not Rust, which mostly replaces C++; even though it can venture on the C territory, its not comfortable nor seamless there. Zig is so seamless, it can even compile your C code along the way. It can do gnarly stuff like handling memory-mapped control registers with relative ease, and with much fewer footguns than C.

C is old, and its age shows. It needs to gradually retire, the way Fortran-77 did.
they'll just throw both out.
There might be things that point towards this not being totally by accident.
What Happened to ThoughtWorks?
I usually evade products with such tricks.
Neuromorphic dreaming: A pathway to efficient learning in artificial agents
> So you are well aware that isn't regular C that gets written, rather something that most HN readers would run away from if forced to write such kind of C.

I'm not sure what your point is.

It isn't always standard C, if that's what you're trying to say.

It's usually not a hosted implementation, but sometimes it is. It's usually done within industry regulated guidelines, but not always.

The fact is, the "not always" bit matters, because the body of C code controlling actions where human lives matter is so large that there is still a substantial body of standards-compliant C code that doesn't kill people!

The claim being made is contrary to the large body of evidence that we have.
Like Yahoo’s head of search before they shut down search?
> I hope no one who has read our work has to go through a version of what I've been through

I’ve had a partial glossectomy for the same PD-L1 negative cancer and have been reading your posts since before I was metastatic recurrent. I think about you relatively often. (I might have even seen you at UCSF a ~couple months ago, but I didn’t want to awkwardly ask if you were the guy from the internet.)
Hey, the tape from Johansson herself will probably be in the top ten most popular choices! Maybe not top five, but at least top twenty, for sure! ;-)
>If the issue were biological lack of electricity, why would childhood trauma be linked to it? And why would it be curable through therapy?

Regardless if the serotonine theory of depression is real or not, something having a biological substrate doesn't mean its hardwired or only kickstarted by biological factors.

Levels of hormones, neurotransmitters, and other substances can drop due to many factors, including diet, exercize, sun exposure, vitamin uptake, issues with insulin, thyroid, and so on, but also "psychological" things like trauma response, stress, continued fight or flight mode, etc.
While this looks alarming and makes an engaging tweet, I have no idea how regular trawling patterns look like. They might circle around fishing spot.
How to Access AWS from Azure VM Using OpenID Connect
Do you imagine it to be especially hard or impossible to replace an interpreter with a compiler instead of implementing a compiler from scratch? It makes it harder to have decided on the language design rather than inventing it in parallel?

From an interpreted Lisp system to a compiler it's mostly a slog of studying compilers and assembly (or machine code) and possibly translating the interpreter, which you can use to bootstrap the compiler implementation if you'd like.

It's common path, see https://mpov.timmorgan.org/i-built-a-lisp-compiler/ and https://bernsteinbear.com/blog/compiling-a-lisp-0/ .
Oh, really? I didn't realize I could detach the presentation element, thanks!
When it comes to trust it doesn't really matter what you use.

In theory 1Password has the superior product, as they use MFA for accessing your vault, and your account password only allows access to the encrypted vault (unlike Bitwarden where your account password unlocks everything).

But that is all theory, and you don't really know what really goes on behind the scenes, and it could all just be "theater". It probably isn't, but that's where the trust part comes in.

Personally i doubt that Apple has any nefarious intent, and i believe their intention is to make stuff better and more secure, and that they protect/respect privacy. Again, this is a matter of trust, and i trust Apple.

I don't base my assumptions on blind trust, but actually review their documentation on their services, like iCloud Data Security [^1]. They're pretty open about how they encrypt stuff, and also mention stuff like when using standard iCloud encryption, your backup of messages includes a key that can be used to decrypt the messages in the backup.

I enabled Advanced Data Protection as soon as it became available, and stopped worrying about it. For stuff that i want to keep secret at all costs i use GPG or Cryptomator.

As for Keychain i use a mix of Keychain and 1Password. Keychain for everything "simple" that i don't care about, i.e. websites that requires a login. It plays well with Hide my Email, and offers the path of least resistance. My 1Password usage is mostly stuff that doesn't fit easily into Keychain.

[^1] : https://support.apple.com/en-us/102651
AI is StackOverflow on steroids. That's how I see it from a programmer's perspective.

It's excellent at getting code snippets, suggesting possible ways on how to handle something, etc. I recently had to help out my son with Arduino programming, which I'm totally new at, and thanks to ChatGPT this was super fast and easy.

But to handle an actual codebase, even a single developer codebase, it just doesn't have enough context for that.

I'm sure some day computers will be smarter than us, but some people are still seriously overestimating this.
Yeah, maybe. Certainly a theory. But that artist impression has 24 dots, so the odds of getting a circle might be the same as getting a well drawn rabbit, or a "lol :)" (pencilling it out 24 dots seems reasonable for a "lol :)").

But the fact we got a circle rather than something funny suggests it is probably a phenomenon that causes circles responsible. Circles are far more common in nature than statistics might suggest. Nature well knows circles.
Dishonest Approximate Computing: A Coming Crisis for Cloud Clients
The FDA's position is that it's better for 10,000 patients to die of neglect than have 1 patient die of quackery.

Drug development takes 12 years [1] and costs >$2B (on average) because the FDA requires >99.99% confidence that pharmaceutical companies are not selling quack cures. Do we need that level of confidence? Especially for cancer, is that degree of confidence warranted? Is the process efficient? I think that it would be absurd to even argue these points.

There's legitimate fear of quack medicine and scammers -- and then there's whatever the FDA is gripped by, which seems to me a lot like insanity.

[1] - https://pharmanewsintel.com/features/understanding-us-food-a...
How does one even find doctors who actually care? seems like luck that you managed :(
Sure but a “superficial” review is what most corps currently run on. Certain crucial code gets looked at more throughly. If there are any bugs QA catches it.

It’s going to be the same with AI. It pumps out a lot of code. Human does spot checks and probably uses other AI to help with the code review. A real human does the really hard, critical code directly. A more robust QA team makes sure it all works.
is full history needed?

for validators it may be last 300 blocks. for bridges 30k blocks. for rollups 300k.

assuming it is possible to start validator from any block(trusting random subset of validators to bootstrap) and account state is way smaller its ok.

also, as i see 100tb costs 3k usd. so some archieval nodes can be just payed some to handle that.
In my country, if there's someone speeding, then I can safely follow him/her a couple hundred meters behind with the same speed. If there's police on the road, he/she will get stopped and get a ticket (or not, if he's "more equal") and I have the time to slow down. We're equal.

If the car gives my location and speed, only those people will be able to break the law and I won't. More inequality than now.
Because OpenAI is the poster child and that kind of AI is already shoved in all kinds of products by Microsoft.

AIs like AlphaFold are hardly in the news compared to OpenAI and its competitors.
Eerily reminiscent of 'badwater' from the game Timberborn. Especially in the second image.
Yeah I'm pretty sure there are plenty of adults that can hear those frequencies though. It's not like everyone reaches 18 and suddenly loses hearing.

Stupid devices IMO. When they first came out I downloaded a sample audio file from the manufacturers website to see if I could hear it. I couldn't.... because they encoded it as MP3 and it was completely filtered out by the encoding! Literally an empty file.
The higher level course load is not a myth: https://old.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/14x2oyp/yes...
> Some form of cryptographic ownership verification is the logical next step to prevent these things from happening.

a.k.a RPKI
Allright, let's not do anything, ever.
Borland -> Inprise

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borland
Private companies provide equipment and software to analyse all raw data going through an ISP. All the big names, from US and EU to some countries in Asia, bought this equipment and software.

So, my guess is that a government's budget can enable sampling anything from "so much bandwidth".
Regarding encryption, if you run the numbers, to brute force common encryption algorithms it would take Google's compute 1 second. Image all Google service have an outage for 1 second. Google is just an example to imagine the sizing required. In other words, technically possible. And shouldn't be dismissed with "oh, there is encryption, so that door is closed for any threat actor".

> Source: I worked on said analytical software.
Can I watch same show on any website of my choice?

Can author really choose not to publish in top 3 streaming services?
So we push billions of dollars into text and picture generators which contribute to more carbon dioxide emissions like MS already showed.

At least we will go down with enough spam texts and cat pictures.
It doesn't need emulation of hardware per se, but most scripting environments are already virtual machines of some variety or another - and RISC-V just happens to be the latest in a long line of virtual machine architectures available for the purpose.

The author is cleverly using libriscv for this purpose - and it is indeed a neat use of the library - but I fail to see the 'scripting' part, personally - isn't it scripting when you can just load a text file off the disk, containing program instructions, have it interpreted into some (hopefully optimized) interim representation, and then pushed through a virtual machine? I don't see the "text files" part here - but perhaps it gets more relevant in parts 2/3/4, which I haven't read yet, either...

EDIT: I heard you like ABI, so I put a foreign ABI within your ABI so you can ABI with your ABI .. actually, this started off as a joke but its kind of painful to think about. This isn't really "scripting" .. its more "embed a foreign ABI into your application so you can throw a foreign binary at it, any time, and modify program behaviour extensively "without needing to recompile" .. maybe the author should rename the article "how to embed a virtual machine into your app so you never have to write (your app code) again .."

I can see why they call it "scripting" since, this is what you usually do when embedding the Lua VM into an app - but the fact that I have to use a compiler disqualifies the term 'scripting' from being applicable here, imho ..
Yes, that is why the scientists did a statistical analysis, otherwise it wouldn't be worthy of publication. From the arXiv paper:

> Using the Convex Hull of Member Spheres (CHMS) algorithm, we estimate that the annulus and inner absorbers of the BR have departures from random expectations, at the density of the control field, of up to 5.2σ.

5 sigma is the gold standard at which we can safely exclude the noise explanation.
> Compared to just about any other attack vector on the internet, BGP hijacking is among the least likely to impact most people.

But when it happens, it impacts massive amounts of people - about once a year on average [1]. Sometimes it's censorship gone bonkers, sometimes it's likely a three-letter agency, sometimes it's fat fingers, and sometimes it's cybercriminals attempting to loot cryptocurrency wallets.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BGP_hijacking
Appreciate the appreciation and thoughtfully laid out idea!

I think we’re actually intrigued and open to build this!

What helps to know:
- is 1080p ok?
- what’s the minimum size you’ll be ok with ?
- aspect ratio?
- any other important details?
Windows 11 24H2 update made my ARM tablet faster
Ok kinda makes for city. We had outcry when some country roads were cleared out of trees. Each of them had a life on them.
Yes. I've heard it's unhackable. We are in good hands.
If someone disagrees with me or if I wrote something wrong I'll be happy to modify/edit my comment, but if you just downvote it really isn't clear
I think more critically it doesn't support remote control. I have no idea how they have missed that critical feature. Do people really enjoy "now scroll down, no a bit more... back a bit... there! stop!"??