skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
According to the official announcement, CoinHome officially launched perpetual contract and flash contract trading services on December 24, 2023, at 18:00 (UTC+8). The perpetual contracts offer leverage of up to 200x. Users can experience trading on both the web and app platforms. CoinHome will gradually introduce more high-quality trading pairs for users to choose from. For more details, please visit the official website (https://www.coinhome.pro/).

CoinHome, registered in the Virgin Islands in 2022, is a one-stop digital asset trading platform focused on providing safe, stable, and convenient trading services for global digital asset investors. CoinHome follows a path of globalization and compliance, having obtained the MSB financial license issued by FinCEN in the United States. In the future, CoinHome will actively embrace local compliance, follow local policies, and ensure the platform operates within a regulatory framework.
It’s ok because they “deeply appreciate” our “support” (money).

What the hell does this even mean?

I was happy with this on my old civic. Now I’m switching to tidal.
to me it all started going downhill when people all of a sudden switched to a worse alternative, MSN

I get it, and wholly agree.
>Showing previous dates is very intentional

Excellent. Happy to hear it. This is the same reason I was thinking to add several hours of history in the daily forecast as well. I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks this matters.

>"I did really like the Dark Sky way of having a vertical bar for the precipitation, with the temps plotted next to it." I'm not sure exactly how that looked. Can you share any screenshots?

This is a good overview.

https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/DarkSky...

Pic 1: The area graph with the heavy, mid, light show the rain for the next hour if it's going to rain. If I remember correctly this went away when it wasn't going to rain. Below that is the vertical upcoming forecast, hour by hour... with the temps shown show it is easy to visually see if the temp is going up or down.

Pic 2: The full view of the current forecast. The pill allow the user to see different metrics in the same format.

Pic 3: The week ahead, showing the low and high for each day. Tapping on any of these days expands the day to show it in the same format as the current format in pic 2. Time Machine at the bottom would let you go look at stuff in the past, but kind of out of the way, that's where I think it would be useful to bring it into the last day or two.

Pic 4: The map. It was a pretty cool map, zooming out would expand to a 3D globe that could be spun around any which way. It was pretty satisfying. (pic 2 here - https://cdn.macstories.net/001/2018-08-21-10-56-21.png)

- You can already click any temperature stats to toggle between Fahrenheit and Celsius. I default to F because I still believe it is the more "human" metric for weather temperature. I use mm for precipitation because I feel that is the more useful unit for precipitation, but in the future this will also be configurable/togglable.

Cool. I agree that F is the more human temp. I'm in the US, so I use F. It was the mm I was looking to change, thought that's not as big of a deal as the temp. I have garage inches vs cm/mm better than I can F vs C.

>Merry Sky already kind of has forecast bars lined up horizontally

It might help if I illustrated what I was trying to talk about.

This is kind of what I had in my head...

https://imgur.com/ibEvZR8

So the upcoming week reads more like a week in a calendar (left to right). In one chart I can see the high and low each day, along with the precipitation forecast details for each day... and I can intuitively see all of this visually. Tapping on a bar would expand it out, like the right side of the image, where the intraday temps (or whatever else) could be seen, and the rain bar would grow to the full height to see details and line it up with the hours.

At first it's simple, but it has depth to the data once interacted with. But even in the simple view it gives a lot of information at a glance.

(forgive the text temps not really being correct based on where they are in the image. I set them all and then rearranged everything a bit to clean it up).
I was curious, looks like the equivalent (calorie-wise) of fries & a double cheeseburger is 1KG of salad.*

So yes, quite hard to overeat salad. Plus, eating that much salad would give a lot of nutrition, and throwing some beans & hemp hearts in would give you a lot of protein too.

Further to consider, it's not uncommon for people to eat the extra large fries and have two double cheeseburgers. The comparison to trying to overeat salad is only more favorable. We can also go furthe rand think of"fancy" burger places like Red Robin, there are several burgers on their menu that are over 2k calories.

* For the back of the napkin math - according to google, there's 815 calories in a fries and a double cheeseburger. For salad, I used this house salad recipe [1] as reference with 148 calories in a 170g serving

[1] https://www.nutritionix.com/food/house-salad
> Respirators are effective down to 300nm

Not exactly. For most filter media, ~300nm is the “most penetrating particle size”. The mask is more effective below that.
They didn't design the iPod ARM SoC though, nor the ones in iPhones for quite some time, and the microcontrollers in Macs for power management and such were not ARM. (I mean, some of them might've been, but the one I'm thinking of was SH or something.)
AlmaLinux OS – Samba File Server
But why would anyone lend to a company which has been bought out by a PE firm then? Wouldn't banks turn around and say "hold on, I know this old trick, you're going to take loads of my money and then give it to yourself and default, and I get nothing"?
> I'm not going to berate the server or kitchen staff; unimaginable.

Who is advocating berating staff? I don't see that in OPs post, nor my own. No one suggests being aggressive towards anyone. Saying the company deserves less money is a capitalistic statement aimed at the corporation, not its diligent employees. You're welcome to to silently withdraw your money from a place of business and leave them with no feedback as to why. But 'posturing' about the reasons of a boycott while also withdrawing money is a great way to attach feedback to an action the company might actually listen to.
Oh damn, I thought this was about real finances, turns out it’s just part of that weird “property” thing they do in NYC. I hope someone’s working on feeding their Ledger files into a structured language model…

More substantively, LLMs are for linguistic tasks. That’s why I’m super super bullish (heh) on llms for decoding EEG data, and incredibly bearish on their ability to accurately model a corporation’s asset flow. I just don’t see how the confounding variables / motivating forces would be at all linguistic. This is basically using LLMs for super-advanced arithmetic
Discussion [0] (61 points, 2 day sago, 14 comments)

[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40450267
Has anyone made a patch or proxy to keep this alive by redirecting the client to their own rogue server? Could entice me to reinstall the software and come back.
The real use case is eye catching advertising, distracting passers by and stealing attention.

Price is getting more competitive though with VR and 3D TV, once you include the cost of the PC needed to drive them. Might start seeing them in a few specialist places like your more exclusive dental surgery. Is 32" big enough for architects to sell designs to customers?
May I hijack the topic and ask you a somewhat related question?

Given the understandably overpolluted with garbage world of scientific research, how would look for some studies with reasonable credibility?

It's my understanding that top journal or sorts sources are likely infused with money from large corporations pushing studies for their favour. At same time smaller sources are full of crap as you noticed.

Is there a way to clean garbage from gems?
This is very helpful, Thank you!

Is it correct to say memory behaviour of a program entirely depends on what/how the program allocates and its memory access pattern? Is there any hello world memory allocator out there?

File system moves blocks to memory, and kernel access them as pages, and kernel also moves them back to disk(using file system) depending on memory pressure. Given this is ture, I am assuming, when studying memory behaviour, virtual memory setup is good enough to ignore file system level details initially - but at what point these details become important? For example, just as cache miss, I am assuming, it is also very expensive for file system(paired with underlying physical medium) to go out and gather non-contiguous blocks and put them together to respond to a file access request.
> they are also trading their own hard-earned credibility for a little cash from the companies that are simultaneously undervaluing them and building products quite clearly intended to replace them.

Which is what they have been doing for years, as per the article, and so it's not really surprising they're doing it again.

> They should have the integrity to say no.

Wow! First time I've laughed out loud at an Atlantic article.

Also:

https://archive.ph/1AYaZ
I can’t wait until there’s warnings on stock market apps like cigarettes and lottery tickets. Well actually I guess there are no warnings on lotto tickets, probably for the exact same reason as why the government doesn’t protect people from being scammed by hedge funds with way more info than they have: the government needs that revenue.
> skill issue

"To each according to his ability. Everyone else suck shit."
> dramatic reduction on the (exponential) virus spread.

Check your assumptions, please!

If you are comparing e^(kt) to e^(0.5 kt), sure, they’re very different. But Covid didn’t spread like that at all. It grew exponentially-ish until the fraction infected was no longer negligible, and then the dynamics changed dramatically, as they must have. After all, you can’t have 1 million times the entire population infected after a couple years.
Most people won't care most of the time. But if the local government cuts the budget for something you like and says "We couldn't find the money," you may care that year.
At best “safety” will only ever be a secondary concern. The primary driving force behind most things called “AI” today is that it will allow companies to automate workers’ jobs, stop paying them, and stop paying for their health insurance. In a country with no right to healthcare, is the safety of those workers part of the question?

Or maybe “safety” just means the chatbot should refuse to tell an offensive joke. Workers should feel thankful that the robot that replaces them knows how to speak PC corporate lingo perfectly.
I've settled on a slightly custom setup based on Plasma and i3wm. It involves a single systemd unit running in user space. I get batteries included desktop environment and a tiling window manager I can tolerate. I also set up zsh+powerlevel10k. In all it takes me about 20 minutes to configure.
Am I misreading this code? It looks like you don't have precomputed table representations and search, instead you scan, embed, and compare on each run?

https://github.com/Dataherald/dataherald/blob/main/services/...
My real showstopper with Hare is the lack of multithreading. In the modern world, we need to be making parallelism easier not harder!
oh this looks great
This looks great!

I’ve done something similar with tippecanoe and mapshaper from gis files. That allowed me to use mapbox.js with my own hosted custom maps, as flat files. Very fast but still needed to run a server (tileserver-gl-light). This could negate that, very cool!
Having the declarative knowledge then being able to practice it. I am sure most people know that they are supposed to eat 'healthy'. It can only be one part of a larger program to combat obesity.
As a pilot, this has always been weird to me. I’ve come to the conclusion that people just don’t like drones. I think selling them to the masses is part of the answer.

I can build a tower (with exemptions for protected airspace) that’s 199ft in the US without any problem. To me, that basically says to any pilot “expect the unexpected if you fly lower than that,” which insanely low to aircraft (not helicopters) not near an airfield.
I was going to make a dumb joke about how this was the plot to a horror story or movie or something. I paused for a few seconds (that's discouraged around here, so it better be a good joke)... and it started to sink in that it could well be the plot not only to a horror movie, but maybe has the potential to be a compelling one. "You'll be made whole, eventually" sounds great, until you think back to all those times in your life where "in a few weeks" would've ruined you. Even death's not out of the question if it pushes someone over the edge into suicide territory. The lunatics really do run the fucking asylum.
Are you referring to 2004 when the movie came out? Just curious what "at the time" means. My personal recollection, the early 2000s was part of a pushback and the movie was part it.

As a trend from the late 80s to 90s, fast food was on the upswing I'd say. Think back to the 1940s when most American's were not getting enough calories, the average American at the time was not getting enough calories. Fast forward to past the 60s when teenage car culture is all the rage, fast food is part of that picture. If there was effectively no fast food before 1950, and by 2000's it was culturally waning, it raises the question of when was peak fast food? Both in terms of cultural "coolness/acceptanced" and per-capita consumption. I don't know if the per-capita consumpion has gone down, but in terms of culture, I'd guess that happened in the early to mid 90s. Probably co-incided with America being mostly under-nourished, to now "over-nourished" (nourished in quotes as there, as soda calories etc are not really nourishment)
I wonder how long until these medicines are freely available and no longer in shortage.

It’s encouraging that there is competition.

I’m guessing it might be three or four years till I could just go the the chemist and get it.
That's a very reductive way of looking at it. They didn't blow up a rocket to find out a specific thing.

The build the infrastructure, build production line, train the team, prepare the rocket, launch the rocket and then attempted the two different parts of the rocket, only the combine them and refly them again to find out that in a specific case where the rocket does specific sequences of events certain assumptions they made in the design that were not obvious in simulation could lead to problems. Even more importantly the validated 1000s of other assumptions they made that turned out to be correct.

> or handled with better tolerances

This is the fundamental mistake in your thinking. It leads to an approach where on every layer of the design every engineering team introduces huge tolerances, just to be sure. This then leads to a system where any individual part has huge tolerances but the system as a whole is costly and performs badly.

One of the first and most important design principles at SpaceX is to challenge requirements. Rather then just adding tolerances you do only what you think you will need. If you do not do to little at least some of the time, you haven't been aggressive enough.

SpaceX probably made many design choices with very tight tolerances where a conservative engineer would have added them. Turns out 1 or 2 of them bit them in the ass, but with this test flight they likely validated that many others are fine.

> I really don't get a sense that this "rapid iteration" approach is a good replacement for better engineering and more care.

What evidence are you basing this assessment on? What large reusable rocket was build with the traditional approach? The only thing that is even remotely close (and it really isn't very close) is the Space Shuttle. The Space Shuttle was very expensive to develop, well above 10 billion $ and didn't achieve many of the goals it had. And it wasn't reusable, with the large external tank not being reusable and the solid rockets being not practically reusable.

If NASA tried to build the Shuttle today, with modern requirements for safety, it would cost much more.

Maybe it will end up being more expensive and fail as a project. But its very early to suggest that. The have developed arguable the best engine ever and have launched the most powerful rocket in history. Not bad so far I would argue.
What about the metadata? Do you listen to whole CDs at a time? I find that adding the tags for each song takes more time than all of the other steps you mentioned. Of course I use Mp3tag for that, but still, would be nice to auto populate somehow.
JetBrains releases RustRover IDE for Rust development
Google is your friend:
https://benhoyt.com/writings/the-small-web-is-beautiful/
https://ar.al/2020/08/07/what-is-the-small-web/
https://blog.kagi.com/small-web

Another related term:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IndieWeb

see also:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_(protocol) (NOT web, but similar in spirit - an extended "Gopher"-like protocol)
The 1988 set at 16x16px is the same resolution as Unifont and UnifontEX emoji, though due to having Plane 0 and Plane 1 simultaneously, UnifontEX works better as an emoji font.
It was essentially the first mass-market instant messaging app
And shows Buenos Aires before it shows Argentina.
The interesting question is, what is the AIM of today that could become the teams of tomorrow
Who is this person? I am unfamiliar with this story.
It allows you to defer subdivision of the mesh (maybe down to micropoly level for displacement) until the final render stage, rather than baking in the subdivision earlier and having to deal with dense geometry for things like animation where it's better to have lighter-weight meshes.
Can an LLM come up with a novel algorithm for this?
Kubuntu 24.04 is great. Currently using 64gb of ram + i7 13700k + 32" 4k lcd, it is enough to run multiple docker containers and runs really snappy with all the animations turned off. Everything worked perfectly out of the box with a z790 chipset.

I use it for webdev and playing with some embeded dev, and anything else that is not gpu-intensive. But 64gb of ddr5 is like $150 these days, very cheap just get that.
That IF is carrying a metric fuckton of weight. And Microsoft has been so shady before that I wouldn't be inclined to trust something like a dot or a toggle - I'd want a hardware killswitch vetted by multiple reputable third parties.
Currently in the US it seems there is a trend for (some) professors to accept work for credit even much later than the official deadline. Which kind of kills the "just in time" idea: the student gets to decide when to actually turn it in.
I give him more of a pass on CFCs, for lead he was actively claiming it was safe despite knowing for a fact (to the extent that he avoided it whenever possible) that it was incredibly dangerous.

Then he died by getting strangled in a traction bed thingy of his own creation.
Here is a trailer: https://youtu.be/EzuI5S-hTc4
With a setup this bespoke, why not transcode to Opus or AAC or MP3 VBR?
A simple core.async job system in Clojure
Tables, columns and views are scanned at configuration time (or based on an API trigger) and stored in the data store and a vector store, not on every run.

They are then retrieved and injected based on relevance to the query.
Yes, the only real argument against the 100% cases that I've ever heard is that there would be fewer people admitting to murder if they knew that they would be killed. But I think this shouldn't bother us, so what if fewer people confess? I think most confessions are already only done when they see themselves having no other choice than admitting what they did.
Also we are talking about the 100% cases, people who e.g publically shot someone or are so mentally ill or stupid that they confess anyway where by definition we might not even need to wait for a confession.

I think most people who are against the death penalty are not fully honest with their opposition, consciously or subconsciously. Outwardly they say that they oppose it due to the danger of innocents being hurt. But inwardly I suspect a far less well intentioned reason because we see an indication for this in the release of murderers from prison after only ~15 years sometimes. What genuinely moral person would ever support the release of a murderer? But see, if we don't execute murderers immediately it starts a whole process in humans. They see the suffering of the murderer in prison and they feel bad. It's automatic, they can't turn it off. This the kind of automatic biological pity when you see someone suffering which is not a good kind of pity in this case. This person murdered another human being, his life should be forfeit. But then an even sicker consideration starts coming into play: The humans who see this other human (murderer) suffering say: Well, this is a waste! This too is inevitable thinking in humans. We see a human being who seems to behave well now, in a cage, and seems to be nice and you can talk normally to them over topics like the weather and family and suddenly the thought comes that this is an economic waste. Then society suddenly has a big, daily economic incentive to release him. This is why I support the death penalty to be carried out immediately, we cannot trust people to be objective about pain and suffering, especially not decades after the committed murder when the wounds aren't fresh anymore. But the victim cannot talk and plead for justice.
This is the phase we are in now: they are rolling out the half-baked tech, its only real use might be private data collection for advertising, so its time to start getting people real comfortable with just sending every shred of audio and video you have to them
I just logged in with my 20 year old password. I see many contacts that I no longer keep in touch. Uh oh!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_(programmer)

https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=near
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_(programmer)
Revisiting The Science™ today is obviously useful for tomorrow. Suddenly dropping the issue is a bewildering position, especially from such a "pro-Science™" crowd.

Why wouldn't we want to know how effective (or not) a given intervention is? It feels like a way to avoid embarrassment.

But I'd argue that most of the lessons to be learned are not about virology or the minutiae of masks. They're about the consequences of politicizing something that's not political, of implementing drastic measures with poorly-communicated rationale.

They're of non-physicians spreading their own opinions and misexplainations (however well-intentioned) while condescending to other non-physicians that they're not entitled to their own opinions because they're not a physician. Like, what?
Bubble.ai
I've had these - or rather, been able to see them - since I was a child out on playing on a large, empty field of fresh snow. I originally assumed they were little ice crystals freezing on my eyes (since it was very cold, and I was often outdoors in the snow when I saw them). Some time in my teenage years, I learned what they really were, which is even more fascinating. Once I notice them, I can pretty easily tune mine out, like one of those optical illusions where you can consciously switch between perspectives. (I have some floaters, and can normally do the same thing with them as well.)