skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not saying you're wrong about the pronunciation, but "jot" is the suggested pronunciation, not the required one [0]. I used "jay double-you tee" for a long time and it doesn't bother me how people pronounce it.

[0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7519#section-1
I believe he said he would eat a ding dong too.
Stop subsidizing demand at the national level. Stop restricting supply at the local level.
It seems the AI confuses literal and semantic searches, that is, if I search for "what is America's finest news source?" it should be clear that I'm not looking for a page containing that phrase but rather one that satisfies its meaning not necessarily respecting the phrase word for word. However, Google is a advertising machine, so I wouldn't be that surprised if a search for "what is the best pizza in the world" didn't return results based on user reviews and opinions but rather a pointer to someone that advertise themselves as the best pizza in the world.
I looked into that for VR headset eye tracking, which uses IR lights plus cameras to see the eyes inside the dark headset.

Here someone did some calculations [0].

> The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection's Guidelines of limits of exposure to broad-band incoherent optical radiation (0.38 to 3 µm)[1] states:

> "To avoid thermal injury of the cornea and possible delayed effects on the lens of the eye (cataractogenesis), infrared radiation (780nm < > λ < > 3μm) should be limited to 100 W m⁻² (10 mW cm⁻²) for lengthy exposures (> 1000 s)"

0: https://docs.eyetrackvr.dev/getting_started/led_safety#about...

1 (pdf): https://docs.eyetrackvr.dev/safety/ICNIRP_optical_radiation....
> depends enormously on other people's behavior.

The disappointment is there seems to be no difference between "needing a single open port" and "needing and entire IP address" due to overzealous egress firewall rules that everyone thought was good engineering practice 20 years ago.
Oh good point - I'd internalized them as "someone has to supervise and it can't be a child" but yeah 18+ wouldn't make sense, would it?
People who rely on street parking don’t buy EV
We're gonna fight about this!
> You can't compare an OS from 22 years ago to an OS from today.

Yes, because the today's OS looks much worse.

Apollo Domain OS was a distributed, multiuser, multitasking OS (actually 3: Aegis, BSD and SYS5R3) which run on 4 MB of RAM in 1988. Today windows is strugling with 16 GB.
And in a gas car you get 300-400 miles of range or more in a 5-minute fuel stop. That’s the inconvenience they needs to be largely overcome.
Perhaps cruelty is the point.

Perhaps they intentionally attack targets that are generally seen in a positive light, to prove to potential customers that morale is not an issue.

Oh, you want me to DDOS a children's hospital? No problem.
>The reason there is a soft limit (in our current theories) is because of the cosmological principle

What? That's a circular argument.

HN is definitely not the place for "me vs. you" grudges, so I stick to making arguments and try to drive the conversation forward, however,

>Have fun! It's quite interesting.

>Unless your goal is to argue, instead of learn, [...]

>Big lol at the wiki linking of burden of proof.

You don't seem to be the one arguing in good faith, though. "You're being aggressive", laughable.
Engineering for scalability here is the single server solution that you throw away later when scale is needed. The price is so small (in this case) for the simple solution that you should basically always start with it.
Oh no, AI used from inter-machine communication is a recipe for disaster in my view. AI it’s simply _not reliable_. You don’t want that for communication between machines…
I think the idea is that if they have the same chemical composition this is good evidence that they formed from the same primordial gas cloud. If they just happened to be passing by each other, there would be no reason for the composition to be so similar.
Very interesting that this works. And great to see experiments like this which open their methodology.

Looking at the status page, https://www.gptinvestor.co/the-gpt-investor/

- GPT version has been better than benchmark 8 times, while the benchmark won 11 times.

- GPT return was negative in 5 experiments and 0 times for benchmark.

- GPT invests in a quite small selection of 1 or 3 stocks (mostly tech).

- The GPT outperformance comes from one 100% bet on NVIDIA that is still ongoing (+140%).

I like my blood pressure a bit more steady to start just yet with this method.
> It perplexes me, and the rest of our neighborhood, how someone can float a mortgage, much less an investment mortgage, without a renter.

In the USA it is happening all the time because, surprisingly, landlords have little skin in the the game. LLC is the name of the game. Each investment property is "owned" by its own LLC that bares 100% of risks and liabilities associated with the property and shields the landlord from the creditors. The property is financed entirely through commercial loans from the banks or other lenders. If the property does not generate enough profits for the landlord they quietly take all the liquid assets out of the LLC and stop paying their loan and property taxes. It takes long time (often years) for banks and local governments to start legal proceedings against the said LLC. During this period of time the property is sitting there boarded up. Finally the LLC files chapter 7 -- liquidation and all its assets, close to zero at that time, are given to the creditors.

You may ask why the banks give loans to such high risk entities? First of all, if the property is bringing profits the loans are being paid of and it is the majority of the cases. Secondly, if the loan fails the banks do not have much skin in the game either. They slice and dice the loans and package them into "real estate investment vehicles". Then they sell the packages similarly to how they did it before the financial crisis of 2008. The terms and abbreviations are different now but the gist of it is still the same.

EDIT: typos
British Museum itself is the master of all thieves, should return everything to real owners
This is very accurate. Thanks for speaking out.
When it's very narrowly concentrated on your eyes for an extend period of time from a short distance, maybe not.

When it's beamed widely in your general direction from a larger distance, you'll be fine.
This paper is about surveilling locations of APs (ie. hotspots), not the devices that connect to them. Thanks to MAC address randomization the latter is basically a non-issue.

>I think phones should have location-based wifi (and maybe bluetooth).

>Unfortunately apple/google/carriers have a vested interest in making our devices very promiscuous. (location services, [...]

You don't see the contradiction here? You want your phones to have location-aware features, but right afterwards say that you don't want it because it makes your device "very promiscuous".
It depends on the energy requirements, because as far as I know we have no idea how to create a "warp bubble" even in theory, but it probably isn't easy or cheap. A day trip to Mars isn't worth a trillion dollars.
The ground plane is copper-poured in that area.
Also wonder if there’s a buffer overflow attack or some command that could cause them to get stuck flashing rapidly or something that would be really annoying. Surprised by the lack of encryption or any security on devices like these. For a long time there was no encryption on the Shure wireless mics most big shows use. Hopefully that’s been corrected as that seems like a real way you could cause (dangerous) problems at an event like a stadium concert.
Uncatalogued doesn’t necessarily mean unrecorded, just it hasn’t been investigated enough to record its history, condition, and significance etc. The items could need cleaning, they could be a box of fragments of pottery that might make a vase, or a large collection of scrolls that haven’t been interpreted.

It isn’t just a record “one Roman gold looking brooch”, a badly catalogued museum item is just as bad as a non catalogued item.
Elon Musk and the Boring company to the rescue?

Pipe retrofitting in San Francisco took years, along its main street Van Ness.

How long would this take in Mexico?
What if it's a lot more than 1-10% at GOOG?

Why haven't I met anyone who proudly works on revenue generating product at GOOG compared to the several R&Ders I know from different social circles?
I replaced all spaces with white e's in a high school paper almost twenty years ago to see if it went through plagiarism control (with the blessings of my teacher, though). It didn't raise any alarms in the system that the whole text was one big unique word, and got 0% likeness with other texts.

So the ideas are old.
Training an AI model is comparable to natural selection of DNA, not comparable to human learning. We have no clue how to replicate human learning.
I also switched to recumbent for the same reason. 5 years of chronic pelvic pain that I would not wish on anyone.
Of course each instance has the same probability. But we're not talking about the probability of an instance, but rather that of a set of instances.

In the dice example, it's obvious that the probability of getting at least one dice facing two is much more likely than the probability of getting all dice facing one.

Similarly, in the planet shape example, I hope you don't think that a pyramid-shaped planet is as likely to form as a sphere-shaped planet.
My wild guess is most of them are ran by companies offering ddos mitigations services.
But doesn’t Apple make sure things break when specific processes cannot reach specific server?
"A standard wall outlet will charge a car perfectly fine for your average driver assuming you can park the car for several hours."

This could be a problem in the future though. As the newer chemistry for batteries increases energy density, it would demand more power or time assuming one still drains the battery a sufficient amount to reduce cycles in an effort to preserve battery life.

Edit: why disagree?
A reminder that not only open-source projects are at risk of sabotage from trusted members.
Thank you for the video. The sound would definitely make me come and stop it.
> Since gmail.com is legit domain

There is the start of the problem. Mailinator.com is equally legit.

> I don't think I could flag it as disposable.

Agreed. But your service would simply push your targets to use gmail.com.
> git diff --staged (shows the diff between the last commit and what you've got staged, great when what you're staging is finicky, lets you double check that you have precisely the files/hunks you intended)

If you set `git config --global commit.verbose true`, then Git will automatically include this diff in the comment section of the commit message editor.
Math isn't a requirement. There are plenty of examples of a dart-based portfolio (sometimes thrown by monkeys) beating or matching a beskpoke, artisanal, investment professional stock picks.
Are speculators the problem is it the fact that housing prices are always expected to go up due to such limited supply? Instead of targeting a symptom, like speculative investment, why not target the root problem of prices always going up so that people can afford housing?
The Canadian government is currently facing this problem. Provinces have constitutional authority over building and zoning. One way they're trying to get around it (though in my opinion, no party is taking this seriously and all efforts thus far have fallen laughably short of where they need to), is by incentivizing the adoption of federal policy by conditioning federal housing grants on the adoption of new federally guided policy.

This is the way for the west, if we're being serious. Once we've taken a few breaths and accepted that we don't want to be authoritative, we can see that incentivizing provinces is the right move.

In my opinion, the federal government should be designing simplified building and zoning guidelines and offering unprecedented grants (on the order of tens of billions) to provinces in a first come first serve manner. Have provinces compete on urgency to receive the most funds, tapering off the offer the longer provinces hold out.
Chargers don't have to have higher amps for larger batteries. It's nice to have, but not necessary, and nothing gets worse with a bigger capacity.

Rate of charging can stay the same, and it will add about the same range in the same amount of time.
> Taking photos/videos on small hand-held cameras and smartphones is permitted.

I suspect you could fit that into the form factor for a "small hand-held camera" that is apparently permitted into the tour.
Stress-inducing that's the right word to describe it
I actually like AuthN and AuthZ as they serve as keywords rather than easy to misinterpret natural language.
My "Have fun!" was genuine, I had a lot of fun learning about this stuff despite not pursuing a PhD in cosmology. Anton Petrov covers this specific topic in a few videos, as well as other large structures, and it's truly fascinating.

The rest was probably a bit uncalled for, you're right. I was immediately put on edge by "Yeah, read the site guidelines, yo." (which, uhh, not sure how that is focused on moving the conversation forward but lets leave it at we were both touchy!)
> The only constraint would be that each IPv6 network would have to have an IPv4 "gateway" address.

In your scheme, any IPv4 address is automatically expanded into an IPv6 gateway address, since there is no other way to map that partial addresses together. So, for every /32 of space you want to add, you have to get another IPv4 and use it as a gateway.

It's also going to be a massive amount of fun doing "second level CIDR" on those gateways.

You've just turned CGNAT inside out to no real benefit.
Isn't the most surprising thing is that a curator would sell a $15,000 item for $40??? Was he addicted to meth and just really needed an easy $40 or what?

Or perhaps he really was a moron and was just breaking the stones out, selling the gold for melt value, and selling the stones for whatever worthless sum he assumed they were/just rocks?
Also known as a bain-marie.
This is cool as hell but why sell yourself short? The rest of the tree is pretty cool too.
At TableCheck we use JWTs to enable user logins across several sub-apps, using an auth service we built in-house using Elixir.

It’s a well-documented standard and we’ve never had an issue with them since launching.

The supposed drawback that sessions must live for X minutes, is just not a problem in practice.
I'm thinking of Steam in particular, but here's a guide for Debain.

https://wiki.debian.org/Steam#Installing_Steam

I think I'm convinced, I'll try Debain and if it doesn't work I can always go back to Mint.
it has always annoyed me that flatten isn't already part of itertools
By processed I mean the act of skinning, gutting, and cleaning.

As far as the near instant end I mentioned, yes I did see it. I pulled the trigger myself, each pig dropped instantly. I wouldn't begin to claim that there is a humane way to kill anything. Taking a life is no small thing, though its a part of life it shouldn't be taken lightly and demands respect.

I had a bad experience with attempting to use gas asphyxiation to put down a baby chick that was suffering. It didn't go well unfortunately, and though I'm sure with just the right setup it would work really well, I don't have such a setup.

While we're on this subject, though very out of place for HN, I've never personally agreed with the idea that death can be humane. It seems to be a relative comparison if suffering from a third party's perspective. We never really know what one experiences when they die, we only know what we see and what appears to be suffering. We similarly assume that plants don't suffer when killed, frankly I just don't buy it. There's plenty of research showing communication between plants, why couldn't they feel pain or loss? Do plants truly not feel anything, or are they just so different from us that we don't recognize any signs if pain or suffering?
I hadn’t heard of DPoP until this mention. Please tell us more. Google tells me it is Demonstrating Proof of Possession, but is it supported by any products?
> Our software had the ability to assign MACs to interfaces for a little while now, and as a response to this study we've now also added MAC randomization, now in the dev branch […]

Will it follow what the IEEE is proposing?

* 802.11bh: Enhanced service with randomized MAC addresses

* 802.11bi: Enhanced service with Data Privacy Protection

* https://standards.ieee.org/beyond-standards/data-privacy-and...
Computer science and technology for a "non-science" teacher
I'm a brazilian literature and language teacher, I teach kids in the elementary and high school and I really love what I do, but some time ago, before I was selected to work as a teacher for the state, I started studying about programming and technology since I wasn't making ends meet as a private English teacher and I was aiming into a job in the tech field. I started on this road thinking it would be almost impossible for me to understand computing in a deeper level, but then I found out that it was something feasible, actually I was having fun learnign something new (namely I started studying Python and I was peeking into SQL and Data Science before I had to focus on my teaching carreer).

Now that I'm working more closely to kids (many of them from the lower class) I can see that as much as they need basic education they also need to be properly introduced to programming, computer science and actual scientific thinking, otherwise I think they might follow a sort of helpless mentality most of their schools years.

Since I'm not the math or science teacher I think people around the school find it weird that I want to work with that, but I know that these are subjects that can involve and be practiced by anybody in a school comunity.

What sources, books, or projects would you suggest to start working these subjects with the kids?

(I know it was a sort of long post but it felt like it needed some context)
I don’t know what tooling you use, but IntelliJ does all that for me, including autocomplete for variables, HTML elements in HTML files or components, and so on.

If you use the inspections, it can also make dead code removal really easy.
No, it is not the case that anything that is less prone to error is good.
Somewhere a copy of the NEC is bursting into flames.

You'd be better of installing a new circuit with proper equiptment. Most homes would be able to at least accommodate a 20amp 220v socket, which takes about 40% of the charging time of a regular socket (15amp 110).
> This particular aspect is the only feature that the authors' libriscv usage and the Lua VM have in common - but that doesn't make it scripting.

Maybe I'm nitpicking, but to me scripting is just programming/extending a certain fixed piece of software to execute instructions not already programmed into it without having to modify that software itself. Usually using an API. Not unlike computer programming, which aims to make a piece of hardware execute some instructions without needing to alter the said hardware. The main difference is conceptual (the platform targeted: hardware or software). If the script happens to be run by a VM emulating a real processor because your software includes such a thing, I think the distinction becomes purely conceptual.

Now, the technology is obviously super cool, but what I don't quite understand yet is what is the best use case for this? Is it really game scripting? Or compiling C++ on the fly?

It's not exactly a simple drop in replacement for a Lua interpreter.
It's probably because someone saved incriminating evidence on it and they refused to take it down.
ADHD traits were an advantage in evolution
Disney patented a very similar system in 2002 (it may be expired now). These were the "Magical Moments" pins, hats, wands, etc, that were sold in the parks. Controlled by IR transmitters.

(I worked on this project and still have the transmitters in my office)

https://patents.google.com/patent/US7564426B2/
It's pretty rare in practice to be able to make authz decisions solely based on the information in JWT claims. Space in HTTP headers is limited and any moderately complex system will have a separate authz concept anyways that can be used to check for token invalidation.
> It perplexes me, and the rest of our neighborhood, how someone can float a mortgage, much less an investment mortgage, without a renter.

This may easier to explain than you might expect. Anecdotally, the people I know in a similar position own all those properties free and clear, there is no mortgage. Consequently, the carrying costs of that empty house are quite low and easily afforded. Also if the mortgage is very old. I know someone with a single-family home in Silicon Valley they don't live in with a mortgage of ~$1000 per month; you can imagine how low the property tax bill must be.

While I am sure there are people with several rental properties mortgaged to the hilt, I don't think it is that common.
This is really helpful. Thank you.

I would like to see some kind of query AST for this stuff in a query engine for semantics that its ops can be fused together for efficiency. For example, like a Clojure transducer.
One would hope after https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2018/jan/28/fitness-tracki...
Google has entered into a phase where short term profits outweigh long term growth.

If you're a startup, don't do this. Maximizing the growth exponent does a lot more than tweaks on per-user revenue. Intentionally annoying users is bad business.

When companies do this, it's also good to look at PE ratios, since it suggests they don't anticipate growth.
drones? that's a whole 'nother can of worms but it could work if you really .. really .. really want to be part of the light show.
>No, I mean, a 2D circle could appear as a line from a certain perspective in 3D space.

Right, and as a matter of fact that's exactly what we DO see with the Milky Way galaxy. It can be conceived of as a circular disc, more or less, but in our sky we see it from the side, as a streak or a band rather than a disc.
Rumour: 2K Could Be Partnering with FIFA on a New Football Game
Batteries are common even in permanent charger installations, because they enable use of cheaper off-peak electricity, and peak charging rates higher than the grid connection.
Amen. For a language that gloats on about "flat is better than nested" you have to jump to too many hoops to get your stuff flattened.
That’s a 370 mile drive. Most EVs can already make that trip today, with a stop in San Bernardino if necessary. Some like the Lucid can do substantially more. In 5 years I suspect no EV beyond a city commuter sold can’t make that trip without a single charge. Those who make the trip without a full charge knowing it’s a limited resource trip would suffer the same fate as people who ignore “last fuel for 100 miles” signs on the route today. Regardless I suspect this problem isn’t one, and it’s not a problem for almost any other location in the entire country so I don’t think we should set national policy based on the relatively uncommon trip of non stop between LA and phoenix, which has an alternative route slightly longer through San Diego and Yuma with more infra.

I would note that a 6 hour drive requires for most people at least one stop to use the restroom and most people require food and beverage at some point as well as a stretch. This is the time span for EV charging. If that infrastructure can exist today it can have EV charging at those locations. In fact the locations who add EV charging will attract customers during the transition period between the age of fire and the age of Maxwell.