skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There are, or at least at the time there were a lot of people whose meals come entirely from fast food. There wasnt a lot of awareness about how bad that could be and there had been a decades long trend towards replacing meals with microwave dinners and fast food. Supersize Me did play a part in reversing that trend. It was trying to make a very valid point about fast food and dining habits. So its science wasnt exact, but complaining about that is like quibbling with a Michael Moore documentary for being a little loose with facts
The next incarnation will surely have enough context to offer some creative substitutions. Swap out gasoline for bunker fuel for a classic twist on a modern treat!
Versus now... I changed the text on a button with an internationalized string. It only took me about a week.

I put the English string in the catalog, updated a number of tests, run the tests on the local system, pushed the change to staging cluster, fix unanticipated test failures, push the change to production, contact the translators to have the string translated to a number of languages, and have documentation updated.
Wasn't this expected? Now there is broader proof of the issues of LLMs as trusted sources of information.
The most deranged people should be in well regulated mental hospitals, not for profit prisons. It's insane to acknowledge that there are people too maladjusted to operate in society, then send them to the one place where you know they'll get no help.
Tired of unfounded assertions.
I could be making huge assumptions here. But I imagine the GP's experiment was as simple as focusing on "recommended calories" (which is 2000 per day) and secondarily, keeping under/over certain nutrients (low sugar/cholesterol/fat, high vitamins).

Food pyramid was much less scientific and more of a basic guideline for school children (and yes, the dairy campaigns were very successful, though dairy at least has nutritional value and usually a good "fill" factor). But I don't think any of those hard nutrient recommendations were every challenged.

Were they? I honestly haven't looked into it.
WKUK actually did a sketch that was exactly that

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOyjzE1vcD4
Because 99% of users and probably 95% of programmers are using the free version while almost no one is using the paid version.
I really want one too. This is the closest thing I could find, but doesn't claim the keystroke level of detail described above: https://www.zdnet.com/article/i-looked-at-all-the-ways-micro...
Without anything but a skim, surely there is no way a MB Pro ships with a virtual keyboard, that is pure torture.
Curious why you decided to open source your entire product. Are you moving to an open core model? I’d expect in that case that much of 2, 3 & 4 would have stayed closed. Would be grateful if you can share your reasoning
Technically salt is a rock so the first part is correct.
Perhaps Google's AI included TheOnion in its training data:

https://www.theonion.com/geologists-recommend-eating-at-leas...
The Rock approves: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aPDRD1PlaM
Large organizations expect to cause some harm as a "tax" built into the system; they are not very harm avoidant, they are more psychopathic (and often led by psychopaths). So new tech is used without much concern about creating harms.

Sure, LLMs do amazing things, but so did all the previous once-disruptive technologies later widely adopted. Electricity, flight, nuclear energy, transistors and integrated circuits, the internet; AI is joining a very competitive list.

We've just never seen a disruptive technology with this much media buzz behind it so quickly, and such rapid technological advances. Disruptive technologies are never "ready for prime time" ... until they are.
I tried messaging someone who seemed to be online and got a system reply telling me that my account had been compromised which is entirely possible as 20 years ago I used that same password elsewhere.
And both things are true. Both parties do various bad things, and their supporters hide behind the "well the other guy is bad too!" argument. The best candidate is the one who has the lowest expected badness; and yes, their chosen party membership is a valid and at least somewhat-informative prior on badness, depending on your personal badness disutility function.
[dupe]

More discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40468436 (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40415846)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40448074

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40461580
People are going to lose a LOT of money using this when the LLM says "buy" and old-school humans who read the same statement say "sell".

But up until that day, it will probably be cheaper.
They have a model with a normal powered agitator.
The one system to keep running
Well, yeah. How else do you keep your gizzard topped up?
That assumption that you will want to scale does not always hold;

The assumption that you want to scale into millions of users do not always hold;

The assumption that you need kubernetes to scale into millions of users (or that you will even want it) does not always hold;

The assumption that solving that problem from the start leads to a better outcome than waiting that the problem appears has "winning the lottery" odds of not being the opposite of the truth.
There has been plenty of work behind the scenes over the decades that has been meaningful.
If you haven’t already looked in to it, beets might be a solution for you

https://beets.io/
Funnily enough, ground birds like chickens and quail do need to eat small rocks or sand. That helps grind up food in the gizzard. I had quails, and the hens ate pieces of oyster shell. That also gave them enough calcium to lay an egg almost every single day.
Yes, but similar to frying it in oil, it won't moisturize the pasta. You'll end up with crispy pasta, only browner. Assuming you're careful about ignition sources, of course.
LLMs are great when accuracy and quality aren't important to you.
I use Emacs as my main editor, but its keybindings are not something I would suggest learning it for. Most shells and Readline programs also support Vi mode, and I would argue that its modal keybindings are much more intuitive and powerful than a random combination of keys. In fact, I would probably not use Emacs at all if evil-mode didn't exist.
> The rumors of future products keep me of buying the current products.

You may have heard of the 5-minute rule - "Will doing this take me less than 5 minutes? If the answer is yes, do it now." An adaption of that to reduce impulse purchases is - "Do I really need this product right now? If the answer is no, don't buy it."
As the Metriport team mentions HIEs/TEFCA don't realistically allow patients to request their own medical records at the moment. However it is possible to request your individual medical records using the Cures Act Final Rule mandates -- it's what powers Fasten Health's Open Source PHR[0] and our B2B Fasten Connect service. The trade off is that patients need to remember & search for each of their health systems & then login to each of their individual patient portals. It's a pretty high friction experience.

- [0] https://www.fastenhealth.com/
- [1] https://www.fastenhealth.com/connect/
cloudflare firewall rule that I think will help protect against this:

(not http.request.uri.path contains "." and any(http.request.headers["content-range"][*] contains "bytes"))

my dynamic pages shouldn't contain any . (extension) so if a request contains content-range: bytes*, we challenge the request.

you may have to modify for your needs
I'm still building my understanding in this space, but so far I've seen its value when using chains and graphs of agents.

The overall system suggests degrees of freedom in search that might not have been available. This is by having a knowledge store in a format (vectors) primed for search, then having it be accessible in full or in partitions, by agents, working on one or more concurrent flows around a query.

I also see value in having a full circuit of native-format components that can be pieced together to make higher order constructs. Agents is just the most recent one to emerge and i can easily see a mixture of fine tuned experts alongside stores of relevant material.

/2c
Not meaningless when 99% of the people use the free version which apparently has license to lie to them far more than the paid version. What a fucking sick joke, pay up or we lie to you even more.
In general farmers should start spraying less and, instead, embrace biodiversity. It's good for nature and bad for Monsanto. Oh, and after just one or two years the recovering diversity also acts on its own against vermin and pests. The result are overall tougher crops.
And that's also why we remember it. It's from a time we used to remember phone numbers (smartphones weren't around, in many countries even normal cell phones weren't widespread yet, and even those had limited memory and usually no way to migrate to a new phone (the SIM could store entries too but had laughably low capacity, like 25 entries with max 9 letters for the contact name)).

So, committing them to memory was just a thing. And our brains get less plastic with age. I can remember my home phone number from 1982, but not my last cell number (before the current one) although I used it for 3 years, as recently as 2014. The insane amount of information streaming in front of our senses probably also triggered some unconscious attitude adjustment (not going to bother remembering any of it, if it's important I'll write it down).
Seems like the money here would be building a shiny, public facing version of the tool behind a robust paywall and build a relationship with a few Broker Dealer firms who can make this product available to the Financial Advisors in their network.

If you were running this yourself with $1M input capital, that'd be $20k/year per 1M of input - so $20K is a nice number to try and beat selling a product that promulgates a strategy.

But you're going to run into the question from people using the product: "Yeah - but HOW DOES IT WORK??!!!" and once you tell them does your ability to get paid disappear? Do they simply re-package your strategy as their own and cease to pay you (and worse start charging for your work)? Is your strategy so complicated that the value of the tool itself doing the heavy lifting makes it sticky?

Getting people to put their money into some Black Box kind of strategy would probably be challenging - but Ive never tried it - it may be easier than giving away free beer for all I know. Sounds like a fun MVP effort really. Give it a try - who knows what might happen.
Not sure why you seem to have perceived this as combativeness. For what it's worth: wasn't the intention.

Have a great weekend, anyway!
> the conclusions drawn were most often unsupported by the data

This is damning. What’s the purpose of an allegedly-scientific paper if it draws conclusions not supported by the data? It’s no better than an opinion column.
Have read Bacigalupi’s The Water Knife[1], Tool of War[2], and The Tangled Lands[3]. Recommended!

[1]: https://booko.us/w/7764514/The-Water-Knife_by_Paolo-Bacigalu...

[2]: https://booko.us/w/9720770/Tool-of-War_by_Paolo-Bacigalupi

[3]: https://booko.us/w/9323748/The-Tangled-Lands_by_Paolo-Baciga...*
unfortunately no, but you can check the free blog
https://www.lycee.ai/blog/getting-started-with-dspy
Kill me with a blunt spoon before I take on a foldable touch screen.
Google should eat a bag of them for this nonsense
I think my PC still had EGA when I first played SQ4. I don't think there was a separate EGA version as such. I think it was the VGA version but I believe the interpreter supported a dithered mode that used the EGA palette but was dithered to try to match the VGA colours.
My Hour of Memoryless Lucidity
Must have a hell for hunger pains, though. I can take a moderate walk and feel hungry (which can lead to overeating and cancelling out the exercise gains). I can't imagine the discipline to simply ignore your hunger for those early weeks with a bunch of water and candy.
Thanks so much for this feedback
Lol try it and get back to us.
I tested out 7 different LLMs today with a seemingly simple task: Write a Python script that takes a protobuf binary and produce a template proto file with placeholder names. Gemini did the worst, with even the import being straight out wrong. GPT4 got slightly closer but still had a bunch of just straight up wrong usage. Surprisingly, Yi (Chinese or Japanese?) was the only one other than Claude Opus that gave code which actually ran on the first try (but still slightly wrong).

I ended up writing the code myself in Golang (which I’m more familiar with) in about half the time it took me to debug the scripts pumped out by the LLMs. There is still a long way to go until we can be certain they save more time than waste.
Or just sell it to exactly one buyer with a lot of capital to invest.
Samsung's skin for android is actually incredibly customizable (to the point you can individually pick color for each UI element separately), as well as including quite a few QoL upgrades that are missing on stock android.

But ye, you have to deal with some sub-optimal 'out-of-the-box' experience and privacy isn't really there (though let's be honest, on stock android google also look at your hands constantly)
I've worked in higher education for decades. I tend to consult on projects that take a year or more to implement.

All of the work gets done in the last three weeks. Every school. Every time.
appreciated, thank you!
OpenAI is excited about their deal with Reddit too, it's a game of one-upmanship in the current AI hype cycle. It also makes Reddit seem very valuable for the AI arms race, could influence its stock price, and there are certain stock holders who are benefiting greatly if this does increase the price.
That must be 3.5? https://chatgpt.com/share/e/f231ff43-bc64-4620-8043-e22c4eb4...
Boeing, NASA say Starliner launch will move forward despite helium leak
No hedge fund registered before the last 2 weeks will use Llama3 for their "prod work" beyond "experiments".

Quant trading is about "going fast" or "being super right", so either you'd need to be sitting on some huge llama.cpp/transformer improvement (possible but unlikely) or its more likely just some boring math applied faster than others.

Even if they are using a "LLM", they wont tell you or even hint at it - "efficient market" n all that.

Remember all quants need to be "the smartest in the world" or their whole industry falls apart, wait till you find out its all "high school math" based on algo's largely derived 30/40 years ago (okay not as true for "quants" but most "trading" isn't as complex as they'd like you/us to believe).
I always had the impression that for certain things, using the search engine as a reference really sucks. At least for “pure ChatGPT” they’ve been working on improving what it spits out.
Every person who has ever been in a reality TV episode will provide stark testimony that it's completely manufactured, yet millions of Americans will staunchly swear that it's just "embellished" reality, not manufactured reality.

It's truly frustrating.
Oryon was designed to compete with M1 then the clockspeeds were ramped up to compete with M2. M3 clearly beat it out and M4 has only furthered that lead.

Oryon will still probably beat x86 designs massively in performance per watt which is pretty much the most important metric for most people anyway (as most people use laptops).

EDIT: your username `dragonelite` is quite interesting. You joined 2019, but the coincidence is fascinating.
Some people have been running Windows 11 for Arm on a VM in Apple Silicon. It has an automatic transcoder that translates most x86 code at start. It seems to run many apps well. Microsoft claims these new machines have a better transcoder. This might work.
For the record: I really wanted to violate the HN rule on headlines and change this to "Boeing, NASA set new Starliner launch scrub date".
Man, I wish teenage me had known about this one, rather than using a pirated copy of Tag&Rename.

Being able to pull tag data from Amazon was really useful, though...
An era ends. Still remembering my number. 9 digits!
As the Metriport team mentions HIEs/TEFCA don't realistically allow patients to request their own medical records at the moment. But there are definitely examples of PHRs that leverages the Cures Act Final Rule mandates around individual patient access.

Fasten Health's PHR[0] and MereMedical[1] are both great examples of this. The trade off is that patients need to remember & search for each of their health systems & then login to each of their individual patient portals. It can be a pretty high friction experience.

- [0] https://www.fastenhealth.com/
- [1] https://meremedical.co/
"buy and hold the S&P 500 until you're ready to retire"
The public defenders' office should have the same amount of funding as public prosecutors'.
The concept of the university is that you're supposed to learn a little bit about a lot of stuff. A significant amount of courses are a "waste" if you only want to consider things directly relevant to a specific career. This is changing a little because people have higher expectations for vocational training from schools these days (because the bar is higher for basic specialized work than it was in decades and centuries past), but the basic idea remains.
"try our free Digital Footprint scam" link in the article.. this is a public service!
One that I don't think a monolith can solve is partial availability.

A monolith is either available or it isn't, which is fine as long as you can guarantee that nothing ever takes down the monolith, but we all know that that's not something you can guarantee.

If you split out services that live outside the critical path, then when those services go down you can still engineer your system to keep going and gracefully degrade the functionality provided by those currently-down services.

This makes incident response much less stressful because there's less urgency, which in turn leads to fewer mistakes during the response and faster recovery times.

(Yes, there are some pieces of functionality that will always be in the critical path, like authorization, but many things don't have to be.)
This comment is the product.

Most recently I experienced it with the slack LLM announcement with a lack of real opt-out. I've long since moved to federated services and minimized my footprint on centralized for-profit services and sites as a result.

Makes me wonder if there is (or should be created) a list of companies and their data offenses akin to layoffs.fyi
Even without any examples, I don’t see how revisiting it today gets anyone on the same page. It feels like a way to play the victim.
I believe this was the 3rd time I’ve seen this book being recommended this week. It must mean something.
> she had seen him yell and shake the child at _other times_

Which she was there for... Her sister never seeing that means nothing.

Being in a custody dispute also means nothing; it's a wash between "she would lie because she was fighting for custody" and "she was fighting for custody because she wasn't lying". I think it can neither lend nor detract from her credibility, so we're left with default credibility of an eye witness. And although eye witness testimony often fumbles details like the order of events, I think seeing somebody shake a baby is probably pretty credible testimony; not something that could be innocently mistaken. If it really didn't happen then she's essentially attempting to murder him using the courts.

Assuming it did happen several other times, it was probably going to happen again and each time it happens is another round of Russian Roulette. You can get lucky once, or even a few times, but somebody who shakes a baby on several different occasions is very likely to eventually kill that baby.
The Google+ comparison is apt: a product rushed out in response to a perceived threat, on which the entire company is aligned and bet, with no regard for how that full-power triangulated focus killed whatever potential it had, if any. They flipped from missing the boat on transformers, a thing they created, to playing catchup on something that's probably mostly fad.

It's like they decided to speed run the trust thermocline they were already in. We're a long way from this Yahoo killer making the rounds on AOL chats and IM.
I don't know how; but I find that you said that ingenious. This comment section is full of touting it as a positive (somehow?) and being pessimistic about U.S. capabilities today in comparison to China. No one seems to mention that all this is unnecessary wastefulness. World hunger would have been solved decades earlier had they not hindered the productive output of those folk expended on such wastefulness.
That hypothetical person or organization already has an advisor in charge of their money at the smaller end or an entire private RIA on the Family Office side of things. This approach is a fools errand.
To start with, I don't have two devices, only a laptop. (And a backup laptop and desktop at home, but I typically don't work there.) Correct, I have no smart phone.

Second, it's not an important security measurement for me. I didn't go into FOSS to be part of someone's supply chain. I do it as a way to share my knowledge of how one might solve a problem. If you want use my code, then inspect it to make sure it does what you want, or pay me for commercial support. Neither require 2FA.

Might someone take over the account? Sure, I suppose. But I'm not into "community building" or GitHub's gamification, and my primary repos are all local, so if that happens and GitHub's support didn't help, I could start a new account. Again, don't depend on me for your supply chain without a commercial support agreement.

When Microsoft switched GitHub to require 2FA I concluded it was because they wanted to assure their corporate and government clients that it was "safe" for them. Those profits subsidize Microsoft's free hosting plans, so my presence there was helping contribute to Microsoft's already excessive market power.

Third, the change was driven from on high, with no chance for me to decide what was appropriate for my projects. I concluded Microsoft was so powerful they could make such paternalistic changes because they knew network effect was on their side that they could have little concern about the small number of people leaving or getting upset.

Fourth, my FOSS projects on GitHub were labors of love that were a net negative on my income. I was not going to spend any money on new hardware or waste my time figuring out how to get things working under a new system when I was already hosting most of my work on Sourcehut, which is much more aligned to my ethical and moral views.

I still don't know how many security keys I'm supposed to have (how often should I expect to lose one? should I store the backups off-site at a friend's place?), or how often am I supposed to test they work? And then I hear about issues about lock-in and how attestation requirements might prevent FOSS solutions ad prevent people from backing up one's own security keys, and issues with resident vs. non-resident keys, and being able to register multiple keys. It's all learnable, but I simply don't care enough.

And I don't see why I should care about all this when the paying customers of my software have all been fine with only a tar.gz, license agreement, and support contract.
Not finding the license anywhere. Which one have you chosen?
Look up the concept of mens rea - the intent matters. If you hire somebody because you want a look/voice-alike that is legally distinct from hiring somebody who happens to have a certain voice.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mens_rea
The US Justice system is built on precedent. If something has been ruled scientifically admissible in court precedent has been set, it is the settled science as far as the US Justice system is concerned. Look at what it took to get lie detectors out of the system (oh wait, they aren't, and while not admissible in court are routinely used as a condition of parole/probation).