skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Depends on the embedded system. It has precompiled binaries for aarch64-linux, but idk about others. There's definitely no public binary cache for bespoke, proprietary platforms though.

> Also, afaiu, Nix is tied to a particular version of libc which has a high probability of not working with the vendor-installed libraries on my systems.

Nix ships a whole dependency tree with every package, down to and including a libc. If you have another libc, Nix won't care.

On the other hand, if your hardware isn't supported by the libc Nix ships, the natural path is probably to package whatever given libc in Nix and build against that. Then you are back to building from source via Nix.

Nix has pretty good support for cross-compilation, multilib, and 'remote builders', though. You can set your embedded systems up so that Nix builds happen on more powerful machines and then get copied over.

Nix evaluation itself requires a lot of RAM, though, so if you use Nix for embedded you probably still want to push packages to the weaker systems from the outside.
So, not a physicist, but the claims in the PDF about how GR has "never predicted a single galaxy rotation curve" are overblown, right? Aren't there a handful of galaxies where the rotation curve lines up pretty close with the predictions from the visible mass? Any new physics has to explain those, too.

Anyway, I think I can see why QI is so appealing. The paper contains a very short and sweet explanation.
Authorization code? Do you mean authentication?
Modal editing is an older concept, where by-default you can't hop in and start typing like normal. Most modal editors (including Helix) start you in a Normal mode, which is mostly used for reading and searching documents. Then you press a button (usually i or a) and get put into an Insert mode, where you can edit the text and type to your heart's content. Pressing escape will drop you back into Normal mode when you're done, where you can save the document and exit the editor.

It's a different workflow, but kinda nice when you want that IDE-style experience in a simpler interface like a TUI.
I was referring to the interferences range where the filter can work, not where it can be tuned. If I correct understood.
Auth0 provides a lot more goodies than this though. Password reset, organizations, multiple login flows, etc
If Programming Was an Anime [video]
Yeah from what I recall RETE can be quite memory intensive in that it keeps the results of any intermediate rule computations that result from changing inputs in memory, in the hope that it will speed up answering subsequent queries (similar to how you might want to incrementally update a materialized view). Subsequent algorithms explored trading off memory consumption for query latency (amongst other differences).
Cool! We have been building feeds on braid, too! It would be very interesting to support FeedAPI with Braid -- you would get much faster pushed updates than you currently do with client-pulled updates!

See our current work on the "feed" spec in Braidmail: https://braid.org/apps/braidmail/spec2.

To support event-sourcing, you could replace those {link: ...} objects with event objects, and just treat each event as data. Then you'd have a url like /event-stream that peers would subscribe to.

Or, you could go deeper, and come up with a custom `Patch-Type:` for your events, which could make your events first-class HTTP citizens that could also be applied to a server using the PATCH method. Then your url might be /system-state, and represent the state for the whole system.

Braid supports such custom events, but be aware that this model is limited in a few ways:

- It's less interoperable, because all peers must know and implement the custom event types (aka patch-type) in order to read or write state.

- You don't get to re-use the beautiful and complicated merge algorithms that support eventual consistency with multiple writers (the OT/CRDT algorithms).

- It doesn't allow summarization of history. It's hard to prune history when each peer needs to know all events in order to do anything.

You might also be interested in PREP, which is a pure event-update protocol being worked on by my colleague Rahul Gupta: https://github.com/CxRes/prep We're trying to merge our work together, if we can.

You might also be interested in our deliberation on the pros/cons of "events" vs. "state updates" here: https://github.com/braid-org/braid-spec/issues/102#issuecomm...
Comprehensive Guide to Generating and Understanding SBOMs with Docker and Djang
Why switch to something new and complicated like htmx?
I have not seen an authorization server that makes it easy to configure no signing algorithm or even one that might be considered insecure. Most of the client authentication providers I have used (I.e frameworks) have also forced a secure algorithm, usually starting with rsa 256. So while technically you can use a no algorithm signer, I have never seen this happen.
I was reminded of the Bobiverse sci-fi books as I read this.
Permissions to me is about setting a policy and authorization is applying that policy.

I have never wanted to use them interchangeably.
I don’t really consider making an API call as “logging in”. The term sounds really out of place other than in a few specific contexts.
So you’ll peddle a conservative power grab by private interests over a public one.

“…a idiot…”

You’re right about peering with idiots. A shame social media is so popular since that’s about all it gets us. Peering with idiots.
Even if I'm doing a one off, depending on the task it can be easier/faster/more reliable to load 6TiB into a big query table than waiting hours for some task to complete and fiddling with parallelism and memory management.

It's a couple hundred bucks a month and $36 to query the entire dataset, after partitioning thats not terrible.
Do you not understand the lack of enthusiasm? The logic will end with why its lack is not disagreement. Whereas the opposite is implied in your post.
Is there anything at this (claimed) scale that allows you to increase the yield, adversity resistance and reduce climate and resource requirements of many potential crops already, that’s not a painstakingly long and somewhat unpredictable process? I first heard of this on the all in podcast [1] where David Friedberg the cofounder of Ohalo talks about it, and as a layman it sounds incredible but would love to hear what people think and how revolutionary it is.

[1] https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vDr1983LIuo
over many years, I've noticed how it's all about differences that get more subtle and precise on every field. I think this specially after watching this the introduction of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMaYFUm8kQQ

this is specially complicated in fields with long histories. I've got an example that may only make sense in both english and spanish: fats, oils, gases/gasolines (grasas, aceites... gasolinas, petroleo)

other subtelties fresh on my mind today:

proposition vs axiom

argument vs parameter

(common) case law vs civil law
This is excellent.

"Like all engineering endeavors,
high speed circuits can only work if negotiated compromises with nature are arranged. Ignorance of, or contempt
for, physical law is a direct route to frustration. Mother
Nature laughs at dilettantism and crushes arrogance without even knowing she did it."
I think that's the first time I've seen <script type=module> in the wild

<script type="module">
import { runDocpageEntrypoint } from "/build/index.3bb1c1f7.mjs";
runDocpageEntrypoint("Production", "");
</script>

But, if I may make a suggestion, it would be so much nicer if those <code> blocks had one of the many JS syntax highlighter libraries applied to them
For comparison, math for the Villach to Edirne trip comes up with USD 158 in gas for the average US car mileage and gas price for 1400km, versus USD 443 for the car + person tickets.
It was named this way because colonialists thought it was what was primarily used in Cherokee medicine that caused vomiting. In reality it may have merely just have been one ingredient or not used at all. The berries also cause stomach upset
It’s not mild, you just developed tolerance.

Source: an Argentinian who drinks more coffee than mate
> If anything is trying to route to only 4 octlets, routers add a 1. in front of it. Bam, legacy solved.

Only for unidirectional UDP.

How do you think the other side would be able to respond if it's unaware of the 5th octlet?
Basically every protocol in existence requires two-way communication and there's no backward compatible way of providing that.
You're talking about tokens in general, not just JWT. The only alternative I know to tokens is to query the DB every time (or perhaps use a cache to make the lookup less often, but then you also have to find a way to invalidate the cache - back to square one?).
Why, what's the point in doing such nonsense? Unless it's someone with lots of money, contacts in the dark web, and some historic Barbara Streisand type chip on the shoulder.
According to Wikipedia the Latin name was given for a reason.

* Historically the ceremonial consumption often included vomiting, and Europeans deduced that yaupon caused it (hence the Latin name - Ilex vomitoria).[11] The active ingredients, like those of the related yerba mate and guayusa plants, are caffeine, theobromine, and theophylline;[12][13] the vomiting may have resulted from the great quantities in which they drank the beverage, coupled with fasting.[6][14]*
Ansible is directly your friend here. Puppet/Chef, and others help in other ways too.

Unless your problem/complaint is deeper then that.

Bored sysadmin: All I do is install X, Y, & Z over and over again. Surely there's more to life then this.

or

Resource-minded DevOps: Hey, it seems like we install the same 4 packages on these hundreds of containers! Surely there's something we can do to optimize this!
You don't have to use your phone any way. Just don't download something if you don't want it, silly.
Reminds me of https://github.com/8byt/gox which I bookmarked when working with Go but never got around to using.
I was unsure of choosing "is"/"are" (is this not the third person singular present tense correct usage?), but besides that I felt like it was a coherent enough expression.

The "yourself" might feel awkward but is required to ensure that I am talking about the specific poster instead of something like "if you are not a X" in which case it would read like a general you.

If you understood what I was expressing and have a better and more succinct way to express it let me know.
The Many Meanings of "Stack": From Data Structures, VMs, to Calling Conventions
Isn't it always a matter of choosing which problems you prefer?
1) lithium mining is up 6x since 10 years ago. You shouldn’t assume the average over ten years is a good indicator about capacity to mine. Mining rates are growing quickly.

2) there are competing materials for new battery tech besides lithium

3) battery capacity deployed per year is growing exponentially

4) when you have large over supplies of energy you can pursue hydrogen. Green hydrogen should be at parity with grey hydrogen in less than a decade. Not cost competitive with just using fuels or batteries for utility scale, but slowly getting there.

5) commercial viability absolutely matters. Subsidizing an expensive source of energy rather than building more and more capacity for cheap energy is a bad strategy while using fossil fuels as a crutch in the interim is a bad strategy. Running a nuclear plant at low capacity craters its financial viability.
I live on a sleepy street that's half dense housing and half single family homes. Density will likely take over more than half of the street some day because the city has been relegating more dense housing to the working class areas of the city, which is where I happen to live. [1]

Of those single family homes there is one that was owner-occupied for a year when we moved in. Since, it's been locked up and has had no renters. The couple that own it own several properties across my city, which I came to know as I got to know one of the owners while they lived here. It perplexes me, and the rest of our neighborhood, how someone can float a mortgage, much less an investment mortgage, without a renter. My owner-occupied mortgage costs me somewhere around $2600/m, I can't fathom paying two with one at a higher interest rate. Apparently this situation is common around my city.

On the other hand, and a bit non-sequitur, is two homes will likely become dense housing. They're foreclosures of properties that were inhabited by meth addicts. The whole property from the building to the soil will need to be removed for various reasons. At auction the properties were purchased for the average sale price of a home of that size that had no pre-existing issues. It won't be the kind of housing people need though, if I'm a betting man; my city has plenty of SROs (single room occupancy) but they're at the wrong price point. They're now called "lofts" and "studios" with a price tag to match. What will be lost is two 50+ year old homes, and likely the ability of our street to tolerate the traffic it was designed for as another issue is the city not investing in road-building and maintenance on our street.

1: https://prp.fm/biz503-portland-building-density/
So for you maybe not nix? I'd have never known given the original comment
How does sync.WaitGroup work under the hood
Oh, do you think it's good to start with qml?
I saw some articles saying c++ is better to learn in the begging
Intervalllength should decrease from start of the week to end of the week.
No, that’s not correct at all.

In meetings, you share the mate across, I’ve only seen 1:1 people:mate relations in American shows (grace and Frankie for example) and we consider that very weird.

The social point of mate is to meet and chat with other people, and spend some time together, sharing mate and food
How do you revoke tokens if a one gets leaked without hitting a db? How long are your users vulnerable to attack?
It's strange that management becomes even more crucial in order to handle and manage offshoring too...
Classic Hacker News, an existing technology reimplemented in rust.
The funny thing is that is exactly the place I want to work at. I've only found one company so far and the owner sold during the pandemic. So far my experience is that amount of companies/people that want what you describe is incredibly low.

I wrote a comment on here the other day that some place I was trying to do work for was using $11k USD a month on a BigQuery DB that had 375MB of source data. My advice was basically you need to hire a data scientist that knows what they are doing. They were not interested and would rather just band-aid the situation for a "cheap" employee. Despite the fact their GCP bill could pay for a skilled employee.

As I've seen it for the last year job hunting most places don't want good people. They want replaceable people.
A problem with the article is the lack of differentiation, for stated or implied diagnoses, between potentially curable conditions and those that are developmental.
coretx’s “…a idiot…” and “privatize everything and force non-owner classes to capitulate to private power” make it clear coretx is exactly the kind of idiot no one should peer with

Government is a “multi stakeholder” model. Whether that or private you get a committee determining based upon the biases of the committee.

Same old human bullshit all the way down no matter the semantic bullshit that annotates how the technical decision was made.
Well, I'm not a physicist, but, from Wikipedia:

> In a strictly FLRW model, there are no clusters of galaxies or stars, since these are objects much denser than a typical part of the universe. Nonetheless, the FLRW model is used as a first approximation for the evolution of the real, lumpy universe because it is simple to calculate...

So unless there's a really strong dependency on the size of the lumps, what breaks on the path from there to something observationally close-enough to the CMB? I mean, I know inflation is a factor there, but that very much postdates the first ideas of the big bang so it can't invalidate the basic idea.

Ed: basically what I'm saying is, there are a lot of routes to a CMB-like prediction based on our observations, and I very much doubt they all get broken by lack of a cosmological principle.
Stargazing in broad daylight: How a multi-lens telescope is changing astronomy
Think you’re giving ‘Everybody’ a bit too much credit.
Tattoo inks are regulated in the EU, my tattoo artist wasn't happy about the regulations when they were first announced a few years ago.
It's almost a law "all technical discussions devolve into interview mind games", this industry has a serious interview/hiring problem.
All that learning going to waste for programerfashion trends
What extensions do you use,

I heard they don’t have great extensions support is that true
Rather than LLMs, I'm more intrigued by models which can generate assets and environments
1.x.x.x.x -> why not 0.x.x.x.x to represent x.x.x.x ?
My thoughts exactly, what is the point of attacking a library... so lame... =/
The first case sounds more like a case for OAuth which doesn't have to use JWTs or digital signatures.

> I don't really want Google or Apple or whoever has, for idiosyncratic reasons, possession of a private key, to sign every request I make to Google Calendar, because they will inevitably revoke it sooner for obnoxious business reasons than any good security reason.

Can you provide more context on this? I would assume asymmetric signing keys are less likely to be revoked than say an HMAC key since an HMAC key must be securely stored at both the client and server whereas you can just put a asymmetric signing key in an HSM at the client and be done with it.
A little of both, I think. I remember having decommissioning ceremonies for long-lived, specifically-named servers, and I remember the era when people were proud of astoundingly long uptimes. Both of those things are aspects of pet-hood that treating servers like cattle changed.
The "and" is very important. The TOS is standard. Cutting paying customers out of your infrastructure so quickly when they haven't done something egregious is not standard.
Coursera on Red Teaming LLM Applications
Maybe it's a form of advertising certain capabilities and services.
Don't worry, you can visit it through the wayback machine instead!

oh wait
> Sorry to say, archive.org is under a ddos attack. The data is not affected, but most services are unavailable. We are working on it & will post updates in comments.
Yes. Also, the survey response rate was the biggest difference between groups (54% vs 47%), which could easily explain the observed differences. The confidence intervals cross 1.0 for nearly all reported IRR values.

For those who don't know how to interpret medical evidence, this study is very weak.
Can you use single mode fiber in a house, or do the transceiver only work over much longer distances? Is transceiver burn out an issue?
The link directs to an announcement via "toot" on mastodon.archive.org
Mate cocido is indeed a known concept, at least in southern Patagonia. It's a Mate infusion that is generally sweetened... I still do drink Mate Cocido every now and again...
We now have autocomplete that could choose the wrong word.
Demystifying Golang Slices
I’ve been working in this industry for decades and this is the first time I made that connection…
> Authorization includes things like license checks, time of use restrictions, etc.

permission to use X license... (or whatever license check means in this context)

permission to use at X time...
Yes, the idea is to send HTML on the wire.

HTMX sends some headers that help you identify the context, this way you can render just a portion of the HTML (e.g. just the partial of the "Todo" list in your "Todo App" homepage). You need some backend logic to handle that but still much less than a full blown JSON API would have.

They also have extensions that can diff and merge the DOM so even a full page load would replace just what changed, this way your backend is pretty much unaffected (you just end up serving more MBs).

There are other libs in this space by the way, like Unpoly and Hotwire, HTMX just got more mindshare.

> Not a fan of this fad of moving programming to embedded strings, also seen in lots of Yaml based systems

I absolutely agree. I had a comment thread with HTMX's creator about this, I feel like it's a bad idea to shove logic into that. He also created Hyperscript (https://hyperscript.org) so it's something he doesn't think is an issue.

In general I think it's pretty easy to rein that in. Just use HTMX to do most of the plumbing it's strong at (react, fetch, swap) and keep the logic server-side. In my experience that covers the vast majority of web apps. If I absolutely need more client-side logic I'd reach for a little JS code or create a Web Component.
What is the relationship between glibc's iconv and libiconv? Both are GNU. They have the same API (but different symbols). Is glibc's iconv more or less a copy of libiconv code? Do they have the same bugs?
Indeed. It's not the ink content that led to Am J Clin Pathol. 2014;142(1):99-103. saying:

"The mean age of death for tattooed persons was 39 years, compared with 53 years for non-tattooed persons (P = .0001). There was a significant contribution of negative messages in tattoos associated with non-natural death (P = .0088) but not with natural death."
Trained, high functioning people with the same condition are likely the best diagnosticians for that condition. At least for The Spectrum. As they would theoretically be better able to identify malingerers. The other side of the coin is that they could be more likely to flesh out a diagnoses in people whose symptoms are subtler or otherwise better covered.
As an example, look at how NIST define "permission" in one of the early RBAC papers:
https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/IR/nistir6192.pdf

Here "permission" is defined as an "Operation/Object pair" - for example, read/write/execute access to a particular file. But crucially, there's no user involved (yet). That's where authorization comes in. When a permission becomes associated with a user (in this case via roles), you have authorization.

This sense of the word "permission" has now become very well established in the field of identity and access control.
Use low TTL and put rate limits and other mechanisms in place?
Fun by any other name would still be fun
Really interesting paper, however:

>The Alpha Centauri system is ideal for testing quantised inertia since it is close
to us and well-observed.

Yet they're using 1994 estimate for AB mass, have nobody measured alpha centaury AB mass since 1994?
“To see all of the globe, you have to rotate it; to see all of our new map, you simply have to flip it over.”

That's a way to see half of the Earth, and then separately see the other half.
Dupe https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40492076
Yeah totally agree. That the size of the tattoo or the number of them not increasing risk makes no sense. Somewhat like claiming whether you smoke a cigarette or 20 a day, the risk is the same. If the latter was true it would more likely indicate that there is some other commonality in that group increasing the risk.

Also the slicing and dicing, “11 more than the index year” and so on, is multiple hypothesis testing on the face of it; I wonder if they adjust for that.
Maybe there is something damning on there that someone needs kept quiet for a while?
I’d use a rofl emoji but it is blocked on HN
It's not called a MacBook Standard Cohort though.