skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is exactly it. And it's a much broader principle than just ransoms. Any organization/group that live outside of an established legal system depends on being seen as honorable if they want to have any relationships with other organizations/groups.

This applies to criminal groups (and individuals), clans in places like Afghanistan or Somalia and even to whole countries when dealing with each other.

Essentially, such groups are playing repeated games of Prisoner's Dilemma. They need to be seen as playing a tit-for-tat strategy. If they are known for playing always-defect (or always-cooperate), other "players" will (if rational) play always-defect against them.

This means they need to be honorable in that they keep their promises. But if someone disrespects them, they also must be predictable vengeful.
Wow, this is a personal Top 100 post on this board for me. What a great story. This part was really touching: <<starting with long division (which was humiliating)>>

Keep it up. We are cheering for you.
Or just spray the molten tin onto the mirrors. That's irreparable
Up until very recently we couldn't even open zip files without a helper software. Unsure why microsoft doesn't add things like powertoys by default.
I can give an example on how to remove all undefined behaviour and preserve memory unsafety. First, we decide that all compilers compile to a fixed instruction set running on a CPU with a fixed memory model. Just pick one of the existing ones, like a 68000 or a 80486DX. Then, we decide that all unitialized memory is actually 0, always, from the operating system and the allocator. That should go pretty far or am I missing something?
OpenAI is playing the short game by trying to strongarm everyone as fast as they can, which might mean that there might not be a moat their generative AIs choose to emit.

Similarly, other companies might be inadvertently playing the long game by forming a better (legal/technical) foundation w.r.t. OpenAI and will silently replace them when they slow down or burn themselves out, because I think that OpenAI is at overdrive, and showing signs of overheating now.
Wasnt there some effort from facebook to give all 3rd world free laptops? Their whole worth is basically just user data so that makes sense. Not sure why it didnt pan out.
> it's that particularly breathy, chatty, voice that she performed for the movie.

Good luck proving that in court.

“You’re honor our evidence is that the audio clips both sound breathy”
allocation is not construction, and deallocation is not destruction. The two steps are oftently executed sequentially but if you think that they are the same you'll end up with leaks, e.g at the level of the operating system (e.g GDI handles). What I mean is that arena allocators are not as simple as you pretend. That depends on what they allocate. The more commonly reason why arena allocators are praised is the cache locality.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymelia
Is somewhere out there a non-rust version, please?
> When the trader checked the value of the inputted basket, they were presented with a figure of negative 58 million for the value of the basket (58 million multiplied by -1). The trader saw a ValAtBM of -58,000,000, which was the number they expected to see, and thus they clicked Execute to continue to the next check.

It wouldn't help.
> As long as there is a clear distinction between what is me, and made my me, and what was done by a machine/company/etc. then I don't really see the issue

What would be this clear distinction if the internet was spammed full of you doing things you would never do? Why should anyone care to find out the real you amongst the fake ones?
> for relatively low risk

This was rocket fuel for activists trying to get a nationwide personality rights law on the books. That would almost certainly increase costs for OpenAI.
Thanks! Hadn’t heard it before now. They don’t sound all that similar to me, though perhaps I am a bit detail-oriented on account of my linguistics background.
don't kick me too much))
another template on the theme of MS DOS

this template is special in that it does not have any graphics, it is made exclusively of text symbols

no frameworks. simple clean code

HTML template made in the form of MS DOS programs

Great for an old school project
I really wish S3 had the ability to rename / move files without having to copy the data all over again. It seems like something that should not be necessary, given that that information is just metadata.

Even if there is some technical reason why the data needs copying, S3 could at least pretend that the file is in the new place until it’s actually there.
Wow. I didn't realize curl had AWS auth baked in. That would have made my life a lot easier a few months ago.
I have no idea about this, but, how hard would it be in theory to test? Just remove a spider from any other spiders and see if they develop that behavior.

I don't know if the parent comment represented the expert consensus correctly, but if they did, I wouldn't automatically be skeptical of it.
> A work-friendly cafe

Funnily enough, what you're describing is actually called anti-cafe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-caf%C3%A9
Yes, they use bing https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/sources...
Manfred, is that you?
I use the DJI Remote 2. It's a little expensive at $150 new / $100 used, but it's justified if you want to use it with a DJI video system in the future (Caddx Vista or DJI O3), or the Avata (but not Avata 2...)

But there are controllers from BetaFPV that are much cheaper. A friend of mine just got started with the BetaFPV Radio Lite 3 ($60 new) and is very happy with it.

Edit: RC2 -> Remote 2.
> they heavily implied that Glover came back, by approximating his appearance with prosthetics, preventing his face from being seen up close, and having the replacement actor mimic Glover's voice

Do you think OpenAI did something similar here? In your case there is some expectation from the first movie, OpenAI doesn't have something similar. I'm really for people getting credit for their work/assets and I would be on the individual's side against the bigtech, but I think this case OpenAI and SJ have at hand already is on the path to set a wrong precedent, regardless of if any and which of them wins.
Every big company is Goodhart's Law in action, Google just hired the best metric maximizers so they are the best at showing it.
Nah that's post hoc rationalization. The amount of busy-work that went into it is ridiculous. Just because a colossal amount of effort was poured in this wallpaper doesn't mean that they used the right tool for the job or that the output was better because of it.
My favourite is a production team spending millions on something trying to make it look like a home movie, etc.
With all 3 of these quotes and replies I feel completely misunderstood. I'm not at all trying to say the things that you're contradicting with. Won't engage anymore, but maybe you can reevaluate.
Every language has turns of phrase that are not necessarily intuitive to non-native speakers.
You say "just add copy and move contructors", but that requires function overloading, which is exactly why he spent a third of the article ranting about name mangling. The point is that there is a tangled network of interdependent features that make C++ work, and you can't ""just"" take a small piece to put into C without dragging a whole bunch of other stuff along.
Listen to the voices side by side:

https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1cwy6wz/vocal_comp...

And here is voice of another actress ( Rashida Jones ):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=385414AVZcA

which actress do you think is similar to the openAI sky voice?
If using a different voice actor to imitate someone is ok, then why did the George Carlin videos get in so much trouble and have to be taken down?

This would be a loop hole to imitate anybody. Including in music right? Like using imitations of Tupac.
Show HN: Affordable text-to-speech for long-form content
Hi HN, I’m Michael, creator of AudiowaveAI. I started this project out of frustration when I couldn't find an audiobook version of Make by Pieter Levels. The available text-to-speech options were either too robotic, overly complex, or simply too costly.

It works really well for non-fiction long-form content (i.e. hours of audio).

It’s early days for AudiowaveAI, and I’m looking for feedback to improve the product. Try it out and share your thoughts: [AudiowaveAI](https://audiowaveai.com). Thanks!
Tabler Illustrations: 50 customizable, SVG illustrations with auto-dark mode
For Ransomware, Backups need to be offline, not necessarily offsite. I.e. there needs to be no possibility of the hackers corrupting or deleting the backups too.

If your data is in the cloud, it's probably good to have an offline backup onsite - sometimes cloud providers delete your account: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40304666
I wish reality were closer to how you see it, but there are people who do far worse to their reputation, but continue to have careers. In the US a doctor can tell their patients that the diseases they have are caused by demon sperm and that alien technology is in their medications/treatments and that doctor still gets to keep their practice/medical license. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stella_Immanuel) Police officers can lie, steal, rape, or murder forcing them to resign or causing them to get fired, but they have no problems getting another job as a police officer the next county over (https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/fired-cops-routinel...). Scientists can repeatedly fabricate evidence for corporations and have long careers doing so. The scientists hired by the tobacco industry to lie are also used by the oil industry and are deciding what chemicals are safe to put in our food (https://publicintegrity.org/politics/food-safety-scientists-...)

This guy probably has a long and profitable career as a scientist ahead of him.
As someone who loves Khan Academy, who was taught math from it when my High School teachers couldn't, it really saddens me this is the emphasis Khan Academy chooses, instead of creating more material.

The fact is, Khan Academy was so useful to me in school precisely because it was NOT a resampling of a Wikipedia page, of every uninspired textbook I was ever forced to read. It was a smart, real life human being who understood the nuances of how actual human beings understood concepts. Sal didn't just break down complex mathematical subjects for me such that I was able to solve linear equations in echelon form, there was also a particular way he emphasised the words he spoke so I understood why something was important. The human factor is so important, and we're fucking over our next generation for market hype.

A few years ago, I was bullish on online learning. But no-one with common sense is as the helm. I am incredibly concerned that Microsoft is believing its hype at the cost of something that was at one point incredibly valuable to society.
we do https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nature_versus_nurture#Intellig...

That evidence is compelling and well-reviewed. But that evidence is also countered with other evidence: the debate isn't settled. But it's undoubtedly clear that a part of our intelligence and other personality traits are inherited: coded into our DNA. What's not settled, is how much.
Anyone can build a bridge much like anyone can make an HTML page render.

Building a half mile suspension bridge supporting millions of cars per day will require a different depth of understanding.
Spotted one of the architecture team.
searx.org

public instances https://searx.space
I went looking - and there's a wiki dedicated to just this topic.

https://windowswallpaper.miraheze.org/wiki/Windows_10

It does seem that the original was replaced in May 2019 by a brighter version, although whether it was drawn on a computer or not is anyone's guess.
That's him. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_wood_pigeon
Then the company hires a stooge CEO that happens to have "coach", and if they don't listen to their "coach" the board fires them. Or the CEO gets handed a board seat or side consulting gig from a key investor. Etc.

You can certainly try to address this, and I'm not saying it isn't worth trying. But I do think you'd be playing whack-a-mole with creative management consultancies and accountants trying to find workarounds for a very long time, and you'd need to be prepared for that.

It also doesn't really address the problem so much - while CEO pay is often entirely out of proportion, the money flow to investors is often a far bigger issue, and would also be a workaround: Ensure the CEO has enough shares, and gets to sell enough shares, and they have a vested interest in doing the work even with lower pay. E.g. there are plenty of CEO's on low pay because their ownership is sufficient.
How does it compare to elm/elmish?
It's probably the perceived value & power it has.

They think they are about to change the entire world. And a very large but of the world agrees. (I personally think it's a great tool but exaggerated)

But that created an very big power play where people don't act normal anymore and the most powerhungry people come out to play.
No, my position hasn't changed - the average person on the street might think this voice sounds like SJ, but since SJ doesn't own exclusive rights to anyone else in the world sounding like her I don't think she has a legal ground to stand on, unless OpenAI pretended it is actually her. But I know for certain that the case will not be decided on spectographs of the voice.
prosecute: to officially accuse someone of committing an illegal act, and to bring a case against that person in a court of law

Source: Cambridge's dictionary (but any other would work as well)
You could have an ad with a voiceover saying all sorts of positive things about your company, in a voice that sounds somewhat like Tim Cook. What you could not do is use a body double, dress someone up like him, or otherwise give the impression that your startup is loved by Tim Cook himself. He doesn’t have a monopoly on slightly southern accents.
This rather speaks against Microsoft than for them. There was zero sense in creating a physical installation to capture it. The result feels digital and should have been digital. This speaks of Microsoft's poor planning and bad execution of plans and ideas.
But what would be the equivalent of:

(let ((quotient remainder (floor x y)))
(+ (* quotient z)
(* remainder (floor z y))))

Where floor is a function which returns multiple values rather than a list or vector of results?

Also, but this is entirely on me being an absolute dullard, I like having the brackets around each binding as a kind of guardrails for my mind to not lose track of where I am and what belongs where.
Perhaps there are some settings that still rely on Google that can’t be disabled, such as push notifications. Most if not all apps from the Google Play store will use their framework to send push notifications to your device. If you get notifications on messaging apps with microG disabled, this could be an indication that your device is still using Google services under the hood
> They literally could have said nothing and just chosen the voice audition closest to Her unconsciously, because of the reach of the film, and that would still be an impersonation

That's a very broad definition of impersonation, one that does not match the legal definition, and one that would would be incredibly worrying for voice actors whose natural voice happens to fall within a radius of a celebrity's natural voice ("their choice to cast you was unconsciously affected by similarity to a celebrity, therefore [...]")
DDG relying on bing for doing searches is... strange to me. I feel like I've seen its own web crawler in my access logs
What if you also have a week between marking/moving a file to start deletion, and the final removal?

If a backup and a GC race then a file can get both referenced and marked at the same time, but then a future GC will see the references and put the file back into a normal state. Assume other operations can still find the file while it's marked.

Are there benefits to CAS for this situation other than resolving faster?
The New-Coke strategy ?
Yeah, it always annoys me to have to pass an initial argument. The idea of identities is built into Lisps and seems conspicuously missing from other languages and I don't know why. In Python and JS people have to write stuff like `lambda x: x` over and over again. The identity function is surely special enough to get its own name.
That and repeated, rejected attempts to hire ScarJo to do the voice. I expect they have ample documentation on that.
> Reliability is always your problem

yup, which is why relying on devs to engineer it is a pain in the arse. Having online migration is such a useful tool to avoid accidental overloads when doing maintenance, its also a grat tool to have when testing config changes.

Currently I work at a place that has its own container spec and scheduler. This makes sense because we have literal millions of machines to manage. but thats an edge case.

For something like a global newspaper (when I used to work) it would be a massive overkill, we spent far too long making K8s act like a mainframe, when we could have bought one 20 times over, and still have change for a good party every week. or, just used hosted databases and liberal caches.
> I can take legal action if I felt inclined to do so, and that's okay, that's why we have a system of law.

So you basically are saying that in these cases law system should have a precedent against deepfakes so that you would be to able to argue on some basis against deepfakes made off of you.

The people now getting concerned about this are setting those precedents, so that when shit hits the fan in your life (it probably won't), you will have an easier path in the court.
It doesn't. The spider's name is 'Number 16'. It could be any alphanumeric string.
I see, so Clojure's let works like Lisp's let*. I didn't know that, thanks for the explanation!
Given that one can write Fortran in any language, maybe you're right.
In England it's not giving any results but the website itself is still up
Who is bullish or bearish on OpenAI?

Now that LLM alternatives are getting better and better, as well as having well funded competitors. They don't yet have seem to developed a new, more advanced technology. What's their long term moat?
> You could change that percentage to any amount and it wouldn't change a thing,

So what you're saying is that the criminals could quadruple their demands, and everyone would still pay?

I doubt it works like that. SOME high profile companies would still pay, but in many cases the threat would not justify paying 4x more.

If we assume the criminals do not generally do much research on each company's ability to pay, but just have a more or less even price for everyone, I think it's rather safe to assume that they've tuned the ransoms to a level that more or less optimizes the total payment they receive.

If it's made 4x more expensive to pay, fewer organizations would pay. And those who still pay will provide a lot of funding for efforts to battle this kind of crime.

> and ransomware attackers will just lower the price if it's not

This is at least half the purpose of adding the tax. If the price is lowered significantly, the economic loss for the non-criminal part of society is reduced.

Also, lower revenues means that it will get harder for ransomware groups to "attract talent", meaning there will be fewer threats out there.

Making payments illegal, on the other hand, just pushes the payments under ground. It's going to be about as successful as when they tried to ban alcohol.
Traditionally, one of Microsoft's weaknesses was how crappy it looked against Apple. Maybe they are trying to say "we care a lot about making this look good".
> From Cambridge's (or any other) dictionary

Where did you get this? I'm seeing "to officially accuse someone of committing a crime" [1]. Criminality is esssential to the term. (EDIT: Found it. Cambridge Academic Content dictionary. It seems to be a simplified text [2]. I'm surprised they summarised the legal definition that way versus going for the colloquial one.)

You have to go back to the 18th century to find the term used to refer to initiating any legal action [3][4].

[1]
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/prosecut...

[2] https://www.cambridge.org/us/cambridgeenglish/catalog/dictio...

[3] https://verejnazaloba.cz/en/more-about-public-prosecution/hi...

[4] https://www.etymonline.com/word/prosecute
What do you think? Is it possible to give a polite, slightly anxious translator bot a metallic-sounding British accent without having to pay C-3PO's voice actor?
I’ve yet to meet an architect I would hire to build literally anything.

I’ve met dozens that don’t know their head from their ass. And always, always when you describe the problem constraints, they mumble and disappear.
Right, but Native Image comes with its own tradeoffs. Lyeden's "premain" work aims to be somewhere between the situation today and Native Image.
When mentioning ancient utilities, I'm still on Disk Inventory X.
I tried ITS under simh and RMAIL had the virtual same interface as today. Ditto with Emacs and Dired.
DuckDuckNoGo
This is not S3, this is authz.

What does 'simple' even mean when you talk about authz?
As someone who works for a competitor, this warms my heart.
Python will literally mangle the names of double underscore members by prefixing them with the class name, to make it harder to access from the outside, so it is not just about communication.

These days I'm for minimalism, most of my structs are aggregates of public members, but sometimes you really want to make sure to maintain the invariant that your array pointer and your size field are in sync.
You probably meant DJI Remote 2. DJI RC2 is the one Mavics use.

Anyway, I just wanted to warn anyone on the market against either DJI or BetaFPV controllers - DJI ones only work with drones that have O3 on them so if you want to fly a whoop you're going to buy another controller. And there's an issue where when your video link to the goggles breaks, your controller is offline for a couple seconds - that's all it takes to lose a drone when flying long range. Not being able to react to video loss by gaining altitude is Not a Good Thing(TM).

Regarding BetaFPV: First, their gimbals are crap. Their build quality is crap as well. Oh, and it doesn't run EdgeTX, doesn't work properly with its own ELRS module when flashed to ELRS v3 and doesn't have a screen so that when you lose your drone good luck using telemetry RSSI to locate it..
Radiomaster Pocket is much better value for the same money
In C++, when you copy a struct instance to another instance, the runtime knows if any fields (to whatever depth) have manually defined assignment or move operators and will call them in the proper order. So it's a deep copy. The same information is used for calling any field constructors and destructors that are user defined.

Introspection (reflection) would go even further and provide at runtime all the information that you have at compile time about an object. But that's not required for assignment and destruction operations to work.

C doesn't have any of that, so a struct copy is just a shallow copy, a bit by bit copy of the entire struct contents. Which works pretty well, except for pointers/references.
This page is IMPRESSIVELY BAD.

I don't even care what it shows due to just how audibly resource heavy it is while showing pretty much nothing other than some simple copy.

There's no way in hell opening the main page should cause so much load my computer sounds like I just opened Cyberpunk 2077 or Doom Eternal at max details, especially given the amount actually rendered (I just opened the page, didn't even scroll anywhere!).

Looking into Chrome's performance metrics it's as if there's constant, ridiculous re-rendering of everything, with just calculating the layering causing CPU fans to go to 80%.
The fucks are there because:

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AvoidTheDreadedG...