skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
All operators, you say? Which of the following:

← → ↔ ↚ ↛ ↞ ↠ ↢ ↣ ↦ ↤ ↮ ⇎ ⇍ ⇏ ⇐ ⇒ ⇔ ⇴ ⇶ ⇷ ⇸ ⇹ ⇺ ⇻ ⇼ ⇽ ⇾ ⇿ ⟵ ⟶ ⟷ ⟹ ⟺ ⟻ ⟼ ⟽ ⟾ ⟿ ⤀ ⤁ ⤂ ⤃ ⤄ ⤅ ⤆ ⤇ ⤌ ⤍ ⤎ ⤏ ⤐ ⤑ ⤔ ⤕ ⤖ ⤗ ⤘ ⤝ ⤞ ⤟ ⤠ ⥄ ⥅ ⥆ ⥇ ⥈ ⥊ ⥋ ⥎ ⥐ ⥒ ⥓ ⥖ ⥗ ⥚ ⥛ ⥞ ⥟ ⥢ ⥤ ⥦ ⥧ ⥨ ⥩ ⥪ ⥫ ⥬ ⥭ ⥰ ⧴ ⬱ ⬰ ⬲ ⬳ ⬴ ⬵ ⬶ ⬷ ⬸ ⬹ ⬺ ⬻ ⬼ ⬽ ⬾ ⬿ ⭀ ⭁ ⭂ ⭃ ⥷ ⭄ ⥺ ⭇ ⭈ ⭉ ⭊ ⭋ ⭌ ￩ ￫ ⇜ ⇝ ↜ ↝ ↩ ↪ ↫ ↬ ↼ ↽ ⇀ ⇁ ⇄ ⇆ ⇇ ⇉ ⇋ ⇌ ⇚ ⇛ ⇠ ⇢ ↷ ↶ ↺ ↻ --> <-- <-->

How about these ones:

> < >= ≥ <= ≤ == === ≡ != ≠ !== ≢ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ⊆ ⊈ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ∝ ∊ ∍ ∥ ∦ ∷ ∺ ∻ ∽ ∾ ≁ ≃ ≂ ≄ ≅ ≆ ≇ ≈ ≉ ≊ ≋ ≌ ≍ ≎ ≐ ≑ ≒ ≓ ≖ ≗ ≘ ≙ ≚ ≛ ≜ ≝ ≞ ≟ ≣ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≪ ≫ ≬ ≭ ≮ ≯ ≰ ≱ ≲ ≳ ≴ ≵ ≶ ≷ ≸ ≹ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ≾ ≿ ⊀ ⊁ ⊃ ⊅ ⊇ ⊉ ⊋ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ⊜ ⊩ ⊬ ⊮ ⊰ ⊱ ⊲ ⊳ ⊴ ⊵ ⊶ ⊷ ⋍ ⋐ ⋑ ⋕ ⋖ ⋗ ⋘ ⋙ ⋚ ⋛ ⋜ ⋝ ⋞ ⋟ ⋠ ⋡ ⋢ ⋣ ⋤ ⋥ ⋦ ⋧ ⋨ ⋩ ⋪ ⋫ ⋬ ⋭ ⋲ ⋳ ⋴ ⋵ ⋶ ⋷ ⋸ ⋹ ⋺ ⋻ ⋼ ⋽ ⋾ ⋿ ⟈ ⟉ ⟒ ⦷ ⧀ ⧁ ⧡ ⧣ ⧤ ⧥ ⩦ ⩧ ⩪ ⩫ ⩬ ⩭ ⩮ ⩯ ⩰ ⩱ ⩲ ⩳ ⩵ ⩶ ⩷ ⩸ ⩹ ⩺ ⩻ ⩼ ⩽ ⩾ ⩿ ⪀ ⪁ ⪂ ⪃ ⪄ ⪅ ⪆ ⪇ ⪈ ⪉ ⪊ ⪋ ⪌ ⪍ ⪎ ⪏ ⪐ ⪑ ⪒ ⪓ ⪔ ⪕ ⪖ ⪗ ⪘ ⪙ ⪚ ⪛ ⪜ ⪝ ⪞ ⪟ ⪠ ⪡ ⪢ ⪣ ⪤ ⪥ ⪦ ⪧ ⪨ ⪩ ⪪ ⪫ ⪬ ⪭ ⪮ ⪯ ⪰ ⪱ ⪲ ⪳ ⪴ ⪵ ⪶ ⪷ ⪸ ⪹ ⪺ ⪻ ⪼ ⪽ ⪾ ⪿ ⫀ ⫁ ⫂ ⫃ ⫄ ⫅ ⫆ ⫇ ⫈ ⫉ ⫊ ⫋ ⫌ ⫍ ⫎ ⫏ ⫐ ⫑ ⫒ ⫓ ⫔ ⫕ ⫖ ⫗ ⫘ ⫙ ⫷ ⫸ ⫹ ⫺ ⊢ ⊣ ⟂ ⫪ ⫫ <: >:

Or these?

+ - − ¦ |\|| ⊕ ⊖ ⊞ ⊟ |++| ∪ ∨ ⊔ ± ∓ ∔ ∸ ≏ ⊎ ⊻ ⊽ ⋎ ⋓ ⟇ ⧺ ⧻ ⨈ ⨢ ⨣ ⨤ ⨥ ⨦ ⨧ ⨨ ⨩ ⨪ ⨫ ⨬ ⨭ ⨮ ⨹ ⨺ ⩁ ⩂ ⩅ ⩊ ⩌ ⩏ ⩐ ⩒ ⩔ ⩖ ⩗ ⩛ ⩝ ⩡ ⩢ ⩣

These?

* / ⌿ ÷ % & · · ⋅ ∘ × |\\| ∩ ∧ ⊗ ⊘ ⊙ ⊚ ⊛ ⊠ ⊡ ⊓ ∗ ∙ ∤ ⅋ ≀ ⊼ ⋄ ⋆ ⋇ ⋉ ⋊ ⋋ ⋌ ⋏ ⋒ ⟑ ⦸ ⦼ ⦾ ⦿ ⧶ ⧷ ⨇ ⨰ ⨱ ⨲ ⨳ ⨴ ⨵ ⨶ ⨷ ⨸ ⨻ ⨼ ⨽ ⩀ ⩃ ⩄ ⩋ ⩍ ⩎ ⩑ ⩓ ⩕ ⩘ ⩚ ⩜ ⩞ ⩟ ⩠ ⫛ ⊍ ▷ ⨝ ⟕ ⟖ ⟗ ⨟

There's a few more, don't worry

<< >> >>> // ^ ↑ ↓ ⇵ ⟰ ⟱ ⤈ ⤉ ⤊ ⤋ ⤒ ⤓ ⥉ ⥌ ⥍ ⥏ ⥑ ⥔ ⥕ ⥘ ⥙ ⥜ ⥝ ⥠ ⥡ ⥣ ⥥ ⥮ ⥯ ￪ ￬
Actually I got it from Google search, so you might have done a little fact checking yourself, before launching into your LLM speech.

This is the top Google search result for "largest solar farm".

"The 15 largest solar farms in the world 2024"

https://www.theecoexperts.co.uk/solar-panels/biggest-solar-f...

Another top result for Solar Star is this:

https://8billiontrees.com/solar-panels/largest-solar-farm/

Which indicates (correctly or not) a current capacity of 314MW for Solar Star 1 (still less than the 1GW needed for Zuckerberg's projected SOTA data center).
The USA has a 5x higher death rate than Sweden [1]. At ~45k deaths per year in the USA, I don’t understand how this isn’t a higher priority on everyone’s mind. Americas roads are terrible, both from a design as a well as from a maintenance perspective. Often worse than a third world country. This could be done quite easily.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_traffic...
Ask HN: Is the line between TUIs and GUIs blurring?
I've heard a lot that a benefit for using terminal software over GUI apps is that they use much less resources. And that's why its better to SSH into servers rather than have them use up resources for a display server, Quartz X11 Wayland etc.. But terminals aren't just outputting raw text, they have text and background colors per character, TUI frameworks have been made for them to essentially have GUI-like elements, like Neovim and Ranger. Things like the [Kitty Graphics Protocol](https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/graphics-protocol/) seem to blur the lines. While I don't know the technical details (please explain if you can!), it's nice that it can render images in the terminal, but how is it different, especially the technical details and resource demand (CPU GPU RAM etc.) to display servers?! Does it work without a display server running on the client, like a "raw" linux terminal where the desktop environment isn't loaded?

I haven't look at this much either but there's also [kui.nvim](https://github.com/romgrk/kui.nvim), a terminal GUI framework built on-top of Kitty Graphics and it seems to escape the TUI constraint of only being able to visualize things with text characters, being able to draw elements of any length. There's a [comment](https://new.reddit.com/r/neovim/comments/110znd4/comment/j8f6pb6/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) on this [Reddit post showcasing kui.nvim](https://new.reddit.com/r/neovim/comments/110znd4/kuinvim_an_experiment_into_a_real_graphical/) discussing the benefits of a terminal are that it's not a GUI. But if you were to use this, then how much would it be different from just using Obsidian with its various plugins along with with [Obisidian-bridge.nvim](https://github.com/oflisback/obsidian-bridge.nvim)?

So what makes a terminal a terminal, different from GUIs and full desktop environments? Is it the low resource usage, is it still low with Kitty Graphics and kui.nvim? Is it the keyboard-centric interaction for higher efficiency? Is it because of the other benefits of commands environments, like unix stdin and stdout piping? If you want full blown GUIs in a terminal environment then how is it much different than using a GUI app with full keyboard navigation and text inputs? How do you feel about rendering full GUI graphics in a terminal?

Personally I like the idea of rendering graphics in a terminal environment is it would be overall better than using GUI apps for the reasons listed above, but I'm feeling reluctant on that.
Adobe comes after indie game emulator Delta for copying its logo
Let me get this straight. You don’t like the US because we removed slavery from our Constitution instead of just removing the Constitution? What were we supposed to do instead?
The report describes well everything wrong with academia, most of it stemming from power imbalances.

But the report itself is also a prime example of academic wrong-doing. Thirty five people report various malpractice, bullying, fraud, even potential crimes, and the report by the committee can only conclude "plausible" misdeeds. Until there are consequences for powerful people (that is, people bringing grant money), these things will keep happening.
It’s good to hear about your workflow, and I agree about the widget too. It’s on the roadmap!
Tim Dodd (Everyday Astronaut) has an overview and interview with Stoke from about a year ago: https://youtu.be/EY8nbSwjtEY?si=-kNtNUFpgiisgsUh
Pytorch and tensorflow is pretty big. It implies all state of the art research code is not written in Julia, so it is a non-starter for any neural network based project.
> Your comment, along with other users, suggests that TLC is a positive attribute for consumers

TLC is better than QLC, which is specifically what my comment was addressing; I never implied that it's better than SLC though, so just don't, please.

It's interesting to see that 3D-NAND has other issues even when run in SLC mode, though.
> part of the reason they don’t lower rental prices is because it’s hard to increase it later

This is a text book example of the problem with rental price controls. The law benefits current renters, but fucks over future/potential renters (because landlords are unwilling to take the risk of renting out a property unless the situation is ideal). Eventually the harm of the law outweighs the benefit.
It seems like the core logistics might still have some value, and offices will now become rental space. Stunning to see a national institution evaporates like that.
Not trying to be facetious: is a Roomba conscious?
There's an arbitration process for chargebacks.
While ssds do not, all flash chips do. So if you were ever going to try building your own SSD or simply connect some flash directly up to your soc via some extra pins, you would be able to program them this way. I imagine extending NVMe to offer this is possible if there was enough popular demand.
Volumetric energy density is largely meaningless when the inside is a low density plasma. It’s not like you need to pay for that volume of steel or something it’s basically free.

What matters is the cost of the walls which mostly scales with surface area not internal volume.
NB a few other common terms for these sorts of puzzles are "paint-by-numbers", "picross" or "nonograms"
My .it bank is making bundle off me.
>Everything is governed by laws, when we uncover it, we can replicate it

Sure, but it's precisely because everything is governend by laws that you can't make it how you want. It's perfectly possible that consciousness is a specific property of organic brains rather than digital computers. I can understand the laws that govern the properties of the Golden Gate Bridge, doesn't mean I can build it out of jello.

That was precisely the misunderstood point of Searle's Chinese room by the way, that a digital algorithmic computer can emulate the work that a human mind can do even the point of being indistinguishable from it, but need not understand any of it (i.e. being conscious of it) while doing so. Or put differently that manipulation of syntax and semantics are completely orthogonal.

That's in fact very relevant in LLMs. An LLM can talk about how strawberries taste as if it was conscious, but by definition it can't genuinely have experienced it.
as opposed to the other non bogus science on the objective measurement of consciousness
That problem you describe is mainly created by low interest rates. In the past with low interest rates it cost them nothing to keep them empty and at the same time the prices of the property appreciated.

Today, with a bit higher interest rates, it becomes more expensive to hold the property empty and the prices do not appreciate or at least not as fast. However, I believe we have not yet seen the effect of these interest rate increases as the landlords typically have long-term fixed borrowing costs which do not need to be renewed until a few years for most of them so unless the interest rates continue to stay at current levels or higher for many years this situation will maybe not improve.
Hey! Thank you! See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40402935
I think the common idea is that the inner surface of the reactor's first wall will be conductive, reflecting the synchrotron radiation back into the plasma, where it will be reabsorbed. Bremsstrahlung, on the other hand, can't be handled this way.

Keeping electrons cold helps limit both effects, which is one reason why Helion's approach is interesting: the ions there are much hotter than the electrons.
If you count simple representation as power and disregard other representations of the same people for different things or by different people (basically, everone will be represented mulitple times), then 99 is enough. Otherwise might need quite a few more.
You're thinking of CT scans. MRIs use Magnets and Radios to make Images, not radiation. you're thinking of CT scans, which use X-rays. we can't get random MRI scans done because they're very expensive.
I see a balise antenna even in the „long term“ architecture diagram and don’t have the time to parse ninety pages of technical documentation. Of course I wouldn’t be surprised if they went to reduce the number of balises, but I don’t think it’s possible to go completely without.
Spiral Dynamics
If only someone made a computer you could put on your lap
No you put it in there. Slavery is now part of the document it is explicitly approved and glorified part of that document. Only way to really fix that sort of thing is to get rid of such evil document entirely. Correct way would have been total and absolute ban. But instead it was chosen not to do that. But to add only tiny clause against it.
I bought a cheap Whirlpool microwave ($200), to replace my cheap Frigidare that lasted 20 years. It has this silencing feature and I love it. You hold 2 down for 3 seconds and it silences all beeping until the next power cycle. My only gripe with it is that it also silences the timer going off (ie, not using the oven, just the timer), which seems a little boneheaded.
Do you believe any country has enough conventional ordinance to end human life on the entire planet? You must know more about this than me, I've never heard of something like this.
>it was unstable when tested at 4 MHz

I'd be willing to bet that sprinkling in handful of bypass capacitors on the rails, and keeping those leads short, would get everything up to 4 Mhz. I don't think those leads are long enough, or have enough capacitance, to be the limiting factor.
Does someone have stock portfolio of superconductor manufacturer to share? I watch Furukawa, Sumitomo, and AMSC and they are performing not bad.
Usenet, authentication, and engineering: early design decisions for Usenet(2018)
I almost always try to avoid subscriptions. I am happy to pay once if it solves my problem but less willing to pay for a long time regardless if I use a service or not, or how much I use a service.
> creating an artificial entity that is conscious and self-aware in a human-like manner is as straightforward as modeling the human brain is monistic materialism.

Why then, not modelling such ebtity isn't creating a self-aware entity? After all, the outcome of a computation does not depend on whether it is actually done.
Neat idea! However one issue with everyone using a digital tracker is that you can't then easily see what other player resource stockpiles and production levels are. Perhaps at the very top of the screen you could have a compact summary view that people can leave their screen at when not making adjustments, allowing other players to see the stats at a glance.
The true story behind the kid who went 1940s viral for his week at the cinemas
Mobile version seems to have odd scrolling behavior where I reach the bottom of the “page” too early.

Cool idea
> It’s not like you need to pay for that volume of steel or something it’s basically free.

I'm talking about the volume of the reactor, not the plasma, and no, it's not "basically free". Very far from it! The size and cost of the reactor is the big issue. In a DT fusion reactor, you're basically (from an economic point of view) burning the reactor, not burning the fuel. The reactor is the consumable that drives the cost of produced energy. The cost of the reactor is a function of its size and complexity. A fusion is reactor is both much more complex than, and much larger than, a fission reactor of the same thermal output. So, if you're using both as heat sources, the fusion reactor will not be able to compete with a fission reactor.

Fusion reactors also have strong diseconomies of scale, since they are limited by power through the first wall, but (contrary to your assertion) cost scales more with volume. So, you want to make a DT fusion reactor as small as possible. However, size is limited from below by the need to absorb neutrons in the blanket, and this distance is set by nuclear cross sections.

These considerations are what drives the desire the use fusion directly to produce electrical energy, not produce heat, so the apples-to-apples comparison with fission can be evaded. For this reason, I consider Helion the least dubious of the fusion enterprises.
Previously, when first published in 2018:

* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16473679
I've read once they determined the mechanism by which a.o lsd 'works', is by lowering/disabling a lot of the filtering between neurons. This leads us to recognise all kinds of patterns that are not really there. Visual hallucinations being the obvious form of this, but I suppose the same applies to other things like our personalities and self; that's neither here nor there anyway.

Now I'm not 100% sure how temperature is implemented, but from what i recollect, might be a reasonable analogue indeed!
Being cheap and easy is not a problem, quite the contrary. That we as a society make this a good thing for spam is a problem, but I don't want to make the system shittier just because of the bad use of it.
It's not obvious, but you have to hold down the button, even after the "progress bar" fills up.
Related, "The Early History of Usenet, Part I: Prologue":

* https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb/blog/2019-11/2019-11-14.htm...

* Discussion Feb 2024: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39408657
Pretty cool! Sounds like a fun project to try to port over to Rust using iced if anyone is looking for ideas ;-)

https://github.com/iced-rs/iced
That is particularly interesting specially in the context of the ways we know the human brain works. For example in Automatic writing, patients with neurological damage, can write coherent text without conscious awareness of the content. Or in cases of Aphasia where individuals can sing lyrics without consciously understanding the meaning of the words.

And finally...who never, when particularly tired or worried with something, left home, lost in their own thoughts, and in a fog...drove to work...just to realize when arriving its weekend? ;-)
Can you point me to the part where it says that? I’ll be sure to vote to change it and/or call my representatives, something I do every so often.

In the meantime while we’re working on that, do you know of any countries where I couldn’t do that? Perhaps places where the state sponsored social media would censor these words I’m typing before they made it to you. I want to keep a list and avoid buying microwaves from those places
AI deepfake Putin film sells big at Cannes
Please stop with the appeal to authority!!

"The argument from authority is a logical fallacy (also known as ad verecundiam fallacy), and obtaining knowledge in this way is fallible."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority

The meta logical fallacy of treating Wiki itself as an authority isn't an intended pun.
I think it's given that there is a letter on one side and a number on the other side if every card and implicitly, that that rule hasn't been broken, otherwise you have to check every card to see that there's no emoji there
Any evidence for that?
better to torrent down the pdf/mp3
Wow so this is actually just a tiny subset of what was already openly available. I'm still interested in how all of this was gathered together though - looks like Anna's Archive got the books from other large datasets, but I'm still confused about the ultimate origin of the data.
Afaik the surface line doesn't stand on their own but with a kickstand, making working on your lap near impossible.
The US has also seriously reduced the use of sugar over the last decades.

I agree that overeating should be shamed, but was that needed 70 years ago? To be honest I don't believe the cultural issue. Which percentage of US citizens believe that they should loose weight? Likely a very large proportion.
The venerable 6502. And if someone wants to argue that, it doesn't fit under the RISC definition in the post (which I like because it sets some good delineation) as it has features like indirect addressing and variable-length instruction sizes
Looking for co-founder / AI Outbound Tool
Hey,

I’m looking for a co-founder to help grow my project, Prosp.ai. If you have experience in growth/marketing, I’d love to connect.

Prosp is an AI tool for hyper-personalized multi-channel outbound (LinkedIn & Email) using generative AI. Here are some of the features we offer:

- Extracting leads from LinkedIn (events, groups, employees, search...)
- Personalized messages based on prospect data
- Voice messages using voice cloning
- Video personalization
- Web scraping for prospect research
- And more..

Building and improving this product takes a lot of time, and I need a co-founder to help take it from zero to one. This involves creating content, building a community, running ads, hosting webinars, forming partnerships, and more. We're currently at $300 MRR.

What I don't need is someone to just run automated email campaigns—I’ve got that covered.

If you’re interested and have some experience, hit me up at yann@prosp.ai.

Cheers,
Yann
The confusion seems to be on your part, because that's not the argument being made here.

The argument is that the 400k books being shared here are themselves copyrighted works that the poster probably does not have the right to be distributing, and that is not very nice of them.

"It's just a dataset, bro!" being used to bulldoze people's rights to their own work might have negative consequences.
I would consider including some context on the homepage that this supports a board game and isn't a standalone game..

Great work too!
I've personally observed a wide-spread refusal to admit that there's a problem that can be addressed when seeing the topic online before.

Absurd as it may be.
I heard it was just that TP is cheap and large, so you can take home a lot of it and once you've done so it feels like you've done quite a lot to prepare and now you have permission to stop preparing. A pacifier, basically.
You could mow the roadside really low, then till it and immediately put down seeds. Machinery would let that scale up more.
Because it's a British story this does spend more time on mentioning the particular British political push back from drivers than it might.

But one example they don't mention I think needs to be mentioned here. Some years ago, British highway authorities tested two interesting ideas. One of these ideas is: Lets put cameras on gantries so that we can see cars in difficulty or stopped in a running lane. Then use the per-lane signage to close that lane, protecting the vehicle and its occupants. The other was: Let's turn the existing "hard" (ie paved) shoulder of multi lane roads into another lane, thus increasing the maximum throughput of the road.

The first idea of course reduces deaths and serious injuries. If your car drops dead in a middle lane of a free flowing road, the people immediately behind you will hopefully realise and evade, but now after a few seconds or at worst minutes the lane will be cleared, meaning fewer opportunities to get rear-ended. Hooray.

But the second idea increases deaths and serious injuries. Instead of a safe(ish) refuge (the shoulder) now it's all running lanes, if your car fails you can head for the slowest lane and if you make it now anybody who doesn't realise you're stopped might hit you at 60mph rather than 80mph. Previously the shoulder wasn't a running lane so while it was hardly a safe place to be, since it was right next to vehicles travelling at high speed with no barrier, you weren't one moment's inattention from a violent collision at any moment.

Under Vision Zero clearly only the first idea can be implemented. But the second idea is very popular with the usual "one more lane! Just add one more lane, that'll fix it" drivers and it's much cheaper than actual road widening. So the British government resolved to do both and claim that if you add them together they're a safety improvement. You know, like if I charge $5 extra, but also give you a $1 discount I'm actually saving you money...

Then of course the first idea is sometimes kind awkward and hard to get right - and the "one more lane" people can't tell the difference anyway. So, eh, you can slow walk that and if a bunch of people die you can probably say the really important thing is you added more lanes - yeah, people are dead but those people probably wouldn't have voted for you anyway.
It's well defined in the philosophical literature as the felt experience of colors, sounds, pains, etc which make up our subjective experiences of perception, imagination, dreams, etc, Qualia is the technical word, but it's also controversial, depending on the philosopher's position on the hard problem and their views on perception (they might replace qualia with representational or relational properties).

Another way of putting it is to use the primary versus secondary qualities. Primary qualities belong to properties of things we perceive. Secondary are properties that are part of the perceiving or experiencing subject. Shape, number, composition are properties of things. Sounds, colors, pains are properties of a perceiver.
This article generated a big discussion on X/Twitter, one of the authors addresses "some of the points raised by the esteemed commentariat" in this thread:

https://x.com/DrRadchenko/status/1780609732274684290
Yeah? Where's it manufactured?
I didn't say we're the only one. But that we are the one we know for a fact are conscious.
Well done to the author on this project. A beautiful architecture and code base with not an "object" in sight. Projects such as this demonstrate how complex interactive applications can be built without pervasive mutable state. Pure functions are everywhere, which makes it much easier to reason about, test and reuse this code
How many books a human can read, understand, tokenize, memorize in 15 minutes, 15 days, 15 months, 15 years?

What's the rate of forgetting for the ingested material for human brain?