skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Someone actually did that and it sends encrypted binary-like data to their servers.
Apple tvOS 17.5.1 fix for deleted photos on platform that cannot delete photos
I still see more twingos than teslas in France
There's no ambiguity here and it's clear what is meant. At some point in the past, someone powerful enclosed a chunk of land and enforced that enclosure with violence. Hundreds of years of systematic enclosure of the commons in the UK denied many people the vital resources they needed to live and Right to Roam is the attempt to reverse some of that elitist legacy.
Utah County Will Buy Your Lawn to Save Water
I'm not so sure of that.

It appears that the land had an easement for access which transfers on sale.

> The land was served by a road easement at the time it was purchased by the state. An underlying landowner sued asserting that the easement was insufficient to permit park visitor travel between Pennington Road and the park, and lost. The court determined that the easement was sufficient to allow visitor use

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutter_Buttes

https://casetext.com/case/campbell-v-state-1088
Thank you for an interesting discussion. This is why I have this throwaway: to talk about things beyond the soundbites in the media without worrying about the downvoters.

To play devil's advocate: why doesn't the US stop now? There used to be a Ukraine entirely under Russia's control politically. Now there is a West Ukraine that is entirely dependent on the USA politically, has Black Sea access, has the oldest city in Russian history, has the oil and gas pipelines running through it (and so provides a way to continue to pressure Russia economically), and has a largely pro-West population. What is to be gained (other than pride) by forcing majority Russian-speaking lands that got accidentally attached to an entity named "Ukraine" to be part of this brave new world?

And before you go "but borders", let me point out that the reason behind many wars in Africa were borders that were arbitrarily drawn by the colonizers for their own convenience, and that often split up historically homogeneous tribes, or forced mortal enemies to be "the same country" (Harari has the details).

Finally, about the "who is going to try to overthrow Putin" point. It seems ridiculous now, but this is exactly what the media were selling back in 2022.
also I think its about time. we don't have the time to super fine tune the document retrieval, and that magic pixie dust gets us 90-99% there. That extra 1% could take time management doesnt want to give.
I had poor credit with LloydsTSB at one time (due to an error on their behalf) and they terminated all my debit cards, credit cards and ATM access. They would only allow me to withdraw cash using my passport at a teller window for about a year.
I don't think there's any guarantee that browser vendors will continue to support WASI 0.1 indefinitely; Once multiple versions of the standard are in play, codebase supporting them simultaneously explode in size. None of this gets into the likelihood that, once WASI hits 1.0, the prior versions very well could be "retired".

And keep in mind that the perspective of the author is that things will only get worse from hereon, with regard to WASM.
All I meant is loosely based on animal/human neural networks.
So you'd prefer they'd be fired if they can generate more value than they cost?
> As prior evidence shows, there is always someone willing to work for less, if they have to.

Such people are not particularly easy to find right now. The employment situation in the US is the best for workers it has been in decades.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS12032194

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS11300060
Hawaii missile alert incident.
You didn't answer the question at all: how do you prosecute a war when all the combatants are embedded in a dense urban civilian population? Are you going to send your soldiers into buildings door to door to face whatever booby traps and horrors the terrorists placed for them? Systematically using civilians as human shields is a war crime for precisely this reason, because it exposes civilians to a great deal of danger.
At least the comparison ive seen between the Model 3 and equivalent BYD was still very favorable to the Model 3. Beep boop.
No, giving money to employers is a subsidy for employers. Giving money to employees is a subsidy /against/ employers.
On the contrary - I think it's much easier!

The real advantage of this notation is that it's much, much easier to stack calculations.

Example:

(/ (+ 34 68 12 9 20) 140)

You can imagine how the first part of that could come about:

(+ 34 68 12 9 20)

And then the second part (pseudocode):

(/ sum 140)

In Clojure it's easy to mash them together, or for example to paste the first calculation in the second.

(/ (+ 34 68 12 9 20) 140)

Want to go further? Easy: add another enclosing parens.

(* (/ (+ 34 68 12 9 20) 140) 1.5 2)

Note how we're stacking in a more human-readable order - a new calculation starts on the left hand side, the first thing we see as we read it.

Compare how verbose the alternative is:

((34 + 68 + 12 + 9 + 20) / 140) * 1.5 * 2
If my name is John Smith, I am not an A.I. expert and my opinion is "Eliezer Yudkowsky is right about A.I. safety" it would be strange if someone was going around saying "That great humanitarian, John Smith, is right about A.I. safety". It seems like a misattribution of the idea or argument. Just saying.

Anyway this article wasn't about A.I. safety it was about a specific technology called LLMs. It's not clear if this discussion is on topic.
I love that it's open-source. Great project and very applicable across a lot of industries, especially those deeply affected by compliance.
Which is odd because Nature will be around long after Alphabet/Deepmind/Google is gone and/or a shell of a brand.
Showcase ML Model Results Using Business Metrics
A) I know, it still sounds smug and condescending

B) I know, it still sounds smug and condescending
One thing I'm surprised that no-one mentions is the fact that, at least in Europe, buyers aren't stupid. They hear the news coming out from China about 1000km range EVs at decent prices, and they're waiting for the improved battery tech which everyone knows is coming.

CATL and BYD are already shipping some cool battery tech right now, and it's only getting better.

And unfortunately Tesla isn't a battery company.
I too would like a fully made library that does what I want it to do. But thats not the case when you're writing it.
Oh I have no idea. Taxonomies just lead to hair splitting.

But I will say that if I saw a scene where a real person jumped a real car over a real canyon, no amount of rotoscoping would make me say that there were no practical effects.
They publish because they need external validation so people are willing to pay for it and they can retain top researchers. It’s not a gift to Nature or its readers, it’s pure self interest.

Giving Google special rules flies in the face of the scientific process. Nature needs to have one, consistent set of rules, as their stamp of approval is what Google wants and they got it without giving up anything in return.

This is a shameful perversion of the peer review process and the paper should be retracted.
I don't think that's how robots.txt or scraping really works. Do you expect scrapers to announce every bot they run? Do you expect webmasters to add a robots rule for every bot?

If someone didn't want OpenAI or anyone else scraping their site, whether OpenAI or anyone else announces they're scraping doesn't matter, if they respect robots.txt, and you have rules to catch unannounced scrapers.
In my experience, the subsets of the community around clojure were one of the biggest problem with it. It's gotten better over the years, but circa 2016 - 2018 it had a spike in popularity despite being very hostile to newcomers.

There was an almost apologist attitude towards rough edges or failure modes folks new to the community would fall into. I managed to work with it for a time despite that, but it left me with a bad taste in my mouth. It's really important to make your ecosystem and communities welcome to new users or they're destined to fade.
The author says who needs SIMD registers! And indeed on early processors like the 68000 you didn't have dedicated SIMD registers so in order to do SIMD within a register (SWAR) you had to do some variant on the techniques presented.

This was used in a fast 4 sample player where it could do math on four 8 bit wave table indices all in one 32 bit operation on the 68000. I had forgotten the details so this was a nice reminder of how it must have worked. I would otherwise have to disassemble it since source no longer exists. Speed was necessary since it was for the Atari ST and the work was done in an interrupt which was quite frequent and it was important to keep the overhead as minimal as possibe.
Really?? For me it's terrible doing that. I also have 64GB RAM but meh. It's so bad when I can no longer offload everything. The tokens literally drizzle in. With full offloading they appear faster than I can read (8B llama3 with 8 bit quant). On a Radeon Pro VII with 16GB (HBM2 memory!)
True if you play Go on a 2x1 board.
Then unique optimal play is pass, pass.
The article is correct that high prices are causing people to keep their cars longer. But it is not correct that the average US vehicle age is related.

When you switch from an old car to a new car, the old car doesn't disappear. Someone else buys it, and when that person switches, someone else will buy it. And on and on, until it is no longer roadworthy "enough" and either is junked or exported to a country where the standard for roadworthiness is lower.

The fact that the average US vehicle age continues to climb is an indicator that the durability of vehicles continues to climb. That's it.
> And antibiotics, computers, fertilizer, electricity, cars, stem cells, etc

What did it bring ? At what cost ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_extinction
I think you have misused the word ascribe.
Wouldn’t load on my old iPhone
https://archive.ph/LBHCt
“engin de recherche” could have worked as well, but “engin” also has a taken negative connotation of something that doesn’t work well
People should take a history lesson from France. Let them eat cake.
In that case the welfare is for the kids, not for the parent. i.e. the number of kids is more important than what their head of household is earning.

Welfare is mainly intended for children and the elderly because we don't want child laborers.
Materialize and Memory
My small brained comment is people use heap allocation when they should be using an arena allocation. And heap allocation shouldn't return a pointer it should return a handle.
Look at Apple’s ML efforts which are the result of not supporting publishing cutting edge research. Or, better yet, ask Siri and you’ll get the answer.
Ultimately, the goal is to maximize worker exploitation. And to maximize exploitation, you need just enough welfare for people to survive, but not enough welfare for them to choose better jobs.

For example; in this scenario if we offered individuals far stronger welfare benefits (schooling benefits, UBI etc) the odds are that very few people would be warehouse workers for Amazon. Alternatively, if we we forced companies to pay for this welfare (such as with progressive taxation based on # of individuals working and on welfare), then they would offer higher wages and with higher wages gives greater mobility.

Make no mistake, this is a feature not a bug of our system. It is designed to keep the poor working in jobs that maintain their poverty.
We have that in the form of EITC and child tax credits. They should be better though.
It's a statement for sure.

It's a statement that their so-called requirement that "Authors are required to make materials, data, code, and associated protocols promptly available to readers without undue qualifications." is actually just a suggestion.

It's a statement that their requirement that papers pass a peer review stage is just a suggestion, you don't actually have to provide information to the reviewers that would be necessary for them to review the work.

If your pockets are deep enough and/or your work is compelling enough, you can ignore those requirements. In modern society, that seems obvious, but people like to think that academia is ideologically motivated and immune to this kind of thing.
I would recommend not using a well-established term for something that doesn't actually match the well-established term..
Porn sites will be used to prosecute you later. (see Assange or every person who messed up with the CIA).

The Matrix is doing well.
Who would hint at what idea?
I hope WaterFox/LibreWolf will remove those AI stuff. Or give option to disable.
Numerically, more people than ever are indeed participating on the internet in all kinds of ways. Some of them crappy and shallow, but many much more creative.

Many people who complain about this not being the case, particularly people on HN with a history of using the old internet, are actually complaining about not having the same limited, much more insularly participative internet they used to. Mainly, you just don't like that much of the far broader internet participation of today doesn't fit your preferences because it comes with all the usual foibles of wider humanity, so you either pretend parts of it don't exist in the first place, or apparently claim they're shallow, spammy garbage.
You're giving me absolutely terrible comp.lang.lisp flashbacks here.
I had already used vim by the time I found clojure during uni (back when I had the energy to learn major new things), but vim support sucked for things like evaluating code blocks in the buffer, so I tried emacs and immediately slapped on evil-mode (vim bindings inside emacs).

For those six years I don't think I used emacs keybindings during that time except to move between files and execute clojure code. I couldn't be arsed to learn it. It was basically a fancier vim, haha.

These days I use VSCode for all software. At some point in my 20s I found out there's life outside of coding so now I use a less esoteric editor. I'm sure its clojure / nrepl / paredit / parinfer support is fine. (Seems to be this: https://calva.io/) Back in 2010 the options weren't as great.
That's basically what we're doing with app.studyrecon.ai.

What we've found is that vector similarity is often not the final solution. It is still only a crude proxy for the true goal of 'informativeness' or 'usefulness' with relation to the user goal/query. Works okay, but we're definitely seeing a need for more rigorous LLM-postprocessing to enrich the results set.

Which, yes, the time adds up quick!
I totally agree. Many folks overlook the UX decisions they make when sharing a project. That's why (in the spirit of HN) I began with a compliment and provided information as to why I made the choice.

While I can cop to the fact that some may interpret my comment as "Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting." it seems there is an equal and opposite lack of consideration around "Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith. "
Not being featured != Not being loved
I'd suggest enjoying that vindication while it lasts.

From my perspective, your perspective is like a horse and buggy driver feeling vindicated when a "horseless carriage" driver accidentally drives one into a tree. The cars will get easier to drive and safer in crashes, and the drivers will learn to pay attention in certain ways they previously didn't have to.

Will there still be occasional problems? Sure, but that doesn't mean that tying your career to horses would have been a wise move. Same here.

(Also, this article is about "poisoned ChatGPT-like tools." Which says very little about using the tools that most developers are using)

I'm always reminded of this:
"Logged onto the World Wide Web, I hunt for the date of the Battle of Trafalgar. Hundreds of files show up, and it takes 15 minutes to unravel them—one's a biography written by an eighth grader, the second is a computer game that doesn't work and the third is an image of a London monument. None answers my question, and my search is periodically interrupted by messages like, "Too many connections, try again later."" -- Cliff Stoll, 1995
Wait, wait, wait... if I buy a share in Google can I get support for my Gmail?!
Supposing that fulfillment industry in general went without these labor subsidies - the industry would pass the costs on in some proportion p and 1-p to dividends and customer prices, resulting in lower investment and smaller sales volumes.

Sounds alright, but then you have noticeably less unskilled and semi-skilled labor demand (possibly as much as 1-4%) in an environment where:

* the long struggle of delegitimising explicit political violence is waning,

* nobody outside of the Club of Rome wants to so much as touch the application of the framing of subsidies and overbuild to the topic of population

* and the math for how UBI interacts with the primary sector is intractable.
Yes it is; it's just not updating the weights.

https://ai.stanford.edu/blog/understanding-incontext/
> Somehow, humans managed to get by for thousands of years without any of this stuff.

By “humans” do you mean 50%, 75%, 90%, 99%, or 99.99% of the population?

By “got by” do you mean “lived mentally strong and resilient and healthy lives” or “just managed to do enough labor to not be ostracized and cut off from resources” or “maybe they couldn’t, but nobody wrote about or wanted to remember those people anyway” or “nobody had the vocabulary to describe their state or behavior as anything more than ‘unpleasant/unbecoming’”?
I have no idea what that means either
It would seem that if you want C with RAII, you...use C++ and limit the features you use. QED.
The question was about warehouse workers, not all workers.
Bluesky adds direct messages
The thing to note about EVs is that car manufacturers fought tooth and nail to avoid having to sell them[0]. Ergo, for a while Tesla was the only option. Other car manufacturers were selling EVs either because Tesla successfully embarrassed them into looking old, or because California literally mandated they sell a certain number of EVs. Hell, for some car brands they were literally paying Tesla money because they didn't have a compliance car to sell.

And then Musk goes and completely trashes his own reputation. First by calling rescue divers in Thailand pedos, then by lying about FSD, wasting a bunch of money buying Twitter[1], and most crucially, surrounding himself with a bunch of far-right nutjobs. The thing is, the far-right doesn't buy EVs, they want cars that command respect by frightening everyone else. The kinds of people actually buying EVs live in or near a city, in suburban housing that can support a dedicated overnight charging circuit. Which makes them far more likely to be progressive or left-leaning.

In other words, Musk sunk his own company so he could go play Twitter culture warrior against his own customers. While not all of the culture war nonsense in the US transposes 1:1 to Europe, it's analogous enough that I suspect a lot of European Tesla buyers are feeling just as shy about their car purchase as American ones.

[0] My personal conspiracy theory was that they were too durable to sell. Everyone but Tesla sells through dealers - in some cases, they HAVE TO - and dealers only make money when you take the car in for service. And EVs simply have fewer things to break, so moving to EVs means less maintenance money.

The way Tesla gets around this is with parts pairing.

[1] It is always moral and ethical to deadname corporations.
You seem to think that healthcare is just like any other fringe benefit that employers and employees may mutually agree to in the employment market. But the US has a (deeply flawed) form of “universal healthcare” where the employer is required to provide the benefit. This mandate goes back to the New Deal era when capitalists were willing to accept such provisions if it allowed them to avoid a communist revolution, which was in fashion at the time. The mandate has been reaffirmed more recently with the Affordable Care Act aka Obamacare. So the story is not a sign that benefits are working, but that there are loopholes being exploited.
but maybe there are some gates are meant to be kept. language evolves, sure, but I literally can't use literally to mean literally anymore because it's sloppily become to also mean figuratively. in this day and age, bureaucracy doesn't have to be glacially slow, and new words could be proposed and officially adopted, if (wait hang on there couldn't possibly be a problem with my plan) people would follow the rules set down by a committee.

Thing is, we have such committees for English, and they say Internet should not be capitalized and I say it should, just like Earth or Sun, there's only one.
Through the Earned Income Tax Credit a some low earners do experience a negative federal income tax.

https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/federal/earned-income...
Using the same notation for function calls and math operators has many benefits that may not be immediately obvious, and which may (depending on preference) outweigh the unfamiliarity. For example:

No operator precedence rules to remember.

Use math operators in higher order functions:

(reduce [1 2 3] +)
(compose + \*)

Simpler parser in the language.

Use kebab-case variable names.

Use most symbols in variable names.

The last two are because of reduced ambiguity in the language.
The benefits for readability can be huge.
For example, I love question marks for predicates in Scheme.

(vector? x)
(filter [1 2 3 4 5] odd?)

I'm sure there are more benefits that I haven't thought of.
You seem to be assuming that if the government doesn’t give these people the money, the employer will. Why is that?

Is it not also possible that the government benefits make low-wage work less appealing, thus lowering the supply, and increasing the compensation?
"Says Elon."

There is absolutely no actual data to verify this claim. How would you know how many "billions" of miles have been driven with "FSD"?

Tesla isn't publishing any data. They just have been caught actually hiding crash report data to the NHTSA.

"My" anecdotical data is simply watching the amount of trash bins vs kids vs other objects the Tesla I am driving is able to detect. But that is still better linking to an unrelated Forbes article talking about damage done to a car when crashing it into a wall, which does not have anything to do with "FSD" in any car.

Actual facts here instead of "Elon says":

https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/inv/2022/INCR-EA22002-14496.pdf
Hiding behind a throwaway account allows you to make false statements, unless you can substantiate the "most of the money" comment. Wikimedia Foundation breaks down its expenditure here:

https://wikimediafoundation.org/support/where-your-money-goe...

I'm sure what poster is referring to was "discussed" previously in the link below. I use parentheses because it descended into flames pretty quickly:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33170710
Yes, WhatsApp works perfectly fine (including notifications) on plain Lineage - even without microg.

It doesn't integrate with Lineage's backup system though, you have to use WhatsApp's own transfer system.