skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Ask HN: So.. what's next after LLMs?
I'm curious as to what comes after this "shove LLM into everything and call it a day" phase is over.

I'm also not exactly convinced when some CEO fires 100 employees in these market conditions, and then says how AI is helping them. Sorry, but these aren't exactly companies that are pushing the needle forward (mostly BPO and low margin non-tech businesses, or companies that have been around a while and still don't seem to get anywhere). It isn't that sexy to say we fired 100 people to save $5 million opex, I'm sure they want to raise more money slapping "AI" onto their brand.

So what's next?

Are you working on something interesting that pushes the boundaries? Or what are you following that some of us don't know much about?
> 'a thread local "context" which you attach all cleanup actions to'

Like the autorelease pool found in Objective-C of yore? I always liked that solution and sometimes implemented in plain C too.
In-group vs out-group. States can take land from out-group, not from in-group (which is why the in-group participates in that state). Also, as someone else pointed out, this land was taken from Mexico, who in turn took it from the Spanish crown. The Spanish took it from the "natives" (scare-quotes since I don't know if that tribe took it from another preceding tribe).
Walmart is another such employer.
I think abrogating the property rights of every property owner in exchange for some people getting a shortcut is not a very good trade.

There are legal routes for public agencies to purchase portions of land to create routes for transportation, including pedestrian paths, that ensure you're at least paid for the lost property. If there is a need, then lobbying your mayor or council is the way to go about this. That's a lot less risky than letting anyone enter your property anytime for any reason as long as they say they're on a nature walk or something.
This really doesn't get expressed enough IMHO: Musk is a liability to Tesla at this point, and obviously unfit to lead the company.

Of course if he gets fired and the drama/fanboyism stops, what's left is a car company that is losing market share, with shitty cars rapidly becoming obsolete compared to the competition. So I don't expect shareholders to act.
If you asked many of them if that amount would he meaningful to them they would say yes. IFor some it's the difference between a good holiday season or not. Just because it doesn't seem like a meaningful amount to you, doesn't mean that tracks to folks who are struggling.

Source - my mom just retired from the Amazon Warehouse night shift.
So where else would they work?
That actually fits well with the origin of the words (as described in the article). And it makes sense because engine is sometimes used metaphorically (?) (as you note), while motor is not.
Is there a chance that the one million nodes in the example - or a where a large list exists in some case where order matters - that nodes could be rearranged?
So instead of 10% more of the high power density material, you want to use 500% more of the low power density material?
Doesn't matter if he is the inventor or not. Anybody sending lawyers after someone because some website used a word they claim to own is a jerk in my book.
> Lead time / effort / skills / equipment to access printed data after >200 years

As long as it hasn't burned, or crumbled, or molded, or...
What's the most insane one ?
Why is this related to amazon though? It sounds like the blame should be fully put on the federal/local governments for the minimum wage that they've set.
Cypress vs. Playwright for Node: A Head-to-Head Comparison
The tax payers are /taking money from/ Amazon, because giving the workers money means that Amazon has to pay them more money to compete.

You can set a minimum wage too if you want, and it usually has positive effects in practice, but these two things are not opposed to each other.
Perhaps when Alphafold was just starting, but now they are the undisputed king.

Would you rather publish or work on the cutting edge?
You have been blocked, apparently Android Chrome is a malicious browser.
Let's make it open lol
Which part's not true, that inequality was lesser in the past, or that social pathology is more today?
If you have ever worked with children you will realize vast majority of them lack the willpower to learn new things and seek out answers. A good teacher can provide the social accountability and guide them, but it's not something you can put on auto pilot with AI.
That doesn't help if the convergence is a bi+ modal distribution, due to the underlying nature of the problem.
Unfortunately it's interface doesn't seem to have been updated since then...
Just wait 10-20 years when self-driving is the norm, it will reduce congestions caused by human's behavior and accidents.
Amazon is hardly one of the "most profitable companies in the world".

Also Amazon can't really raise prices without losing sales - I've already shifted many of my purchases because Amazon is too expensive. They don't really have room to raise wages without hurting the people who are buying the products.

People forget that a lot - if you raise wages you also have to raise prices, which ends up hurting the exact people you are raising wages for.

> What’s the point of a job, if you can’t live on it?

To have more money than you had before.

I feel no anger here, people are paid based on the economic value of their output. They are not paid based on their worth as humans. If you want to be paid more you need to be able to do move valuable work.
Amazon SES introduces new email routing and archiving features
Which problem has been solved?

There are 250M cars on the road in Europe. Clogging up public space and requiring human labor to be driven around. There are cars everywhere in Germany.
Seems like a large escalation. I think you need to justify this one.
60% of those people were not employed, unlike the Amazon workers workers
I'm not up to speed on it, but I'll do my own research since I'm sure you're right.
Oh look you're basically me in 2006 thinking that all the sysadmins that couldn't be bothered to learn a real programming language needed to be replaced by people in India who weren't intellectually lazy (because I was a bit of an asshole and wrong).
From reading this, my sense is that the poisoning attack is happening above our level and as a coder, I would consider it the LLM provider’s job to guard against this sort of attack.

The headline made me think this sort of attack involved someone poisoning via something sent through the api, but how can I possibly concern myself with the training data that the AI which I use uses?

I generally read and understand the suggestions made by the code editor, so I’m not too worried that the autosuggestions are poisoned, but I mostly feel like there’s nothing I can do about it.
The film’s (Fury Road) promotional material was full of before-and-after shots comparing the real shots with the final with-CG shots. They did that because they were showing off that an absolute ton of what’s on screen was real compared to what most other modern productions would have done with the same sequences, but they didn’t really seem to be trying to hide that they also extensively used CG.
The reason why the HN guidelines discourage modifying the title is because it's too easy to accidentally misrepresent the content of the article. This is the actual conclusion, which is interesting, but not accurately captured in the modified title:

> The in-lab study results showed that developers using a poisoned ChatGPT-like tool were more prone to including insecure code than those using an IntelliCode-like tool or no tool.

Looking at the actual paper, the results suggest that developers miss security holes in fully generated blocks of code more frequently than they do with code that an AI completes, and both versions of AI tooling seem to have increased error rates relative to no tool in this very small study (10 devs per category).

Those results bear almost no relation to the submitted title's claim that developers don't care about poisoning attacks.
> I imagine someone will write some script that blocks it.

Why? We are not in such a position that we need to put up with antagonistic OS vendors. Workarounds are just making it worse by keeping technologists on Windows.
I was wrong earlier, as the overall EV market within Europe grew 14%

I'd recommend taking a look at the Industry data used in the article - https://www.acea.auto/pc-registrations/new-car-registrations...

Much of the growth seems to be driven numerically speaking by the Spanish and German markets.

In Spain, that growth seems to be mostly caused by Tesla [0]. MG and Volvo XC30 (Geely) make a showing, but the Model Y sold more in a month than both combined.

Germany's seems to be driven by Mercedes-Benz and BMW [1]

It seems more like the Tesla is less popular in Germany than it used to be previously, but I'm reading mixed information that Germany has also phased out environmental bonuses [2] (German penny wise pound foolish thinking strikes again).

It seems the biggest hit to Tesla is France, where French companies like Puegot (Stellaris) and Renault have outcompeted the Tesla. Surprised by Renault because they are also a prominent EV seller in the Indian market.

[0] - https://alternative-fuels-observatory.ec.europa.eu/general-i...

[1] - https://insideevs.com/news/719822/plugin-car-sales-germany-a...

[2] - https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/german...
For synchronizing contacts and calendar, OP may use DAVX5
I agree, it's a backwards move. Smartphones already absorbed the functionality of discrete devices like cameras, music players, etc. Why anyone would want to go back to carrying more stuff is beyond me.
As others in this thread have already pointed out: look at Top Gun Maverick, or the latest Mission Impossible.

In the former case, they filmed jets and jet cockpits, but all of the jets and cockpits are replaced by CG ones, only the actors remain if they are visible.

In the latter, in the motorcycle chase scene and when Tom jumps over the edge, aside from him and the bike, basically everything else is digital, e.g. digital train, terrain, trees, ground and everything.

They jumped the train off a bridge FOR REAL at the end of the chase, but then paint it over completely with a digital train. The only thing that stayed is some water splashes, that’s it.

This is intentionally concealed by the studio marketing saying it “was practical”. Yes they did do it “for real”, but it erases the work done on all of the digital effects that end up making up the majority of what you see in the movie.

That’s just dishonest, and what people are upset about.
Yeah, the example of "what if you make a copy" breaks in C++ in exactly the same way if you're not careful.
Just had it too, refreshing worked.
Someone could make a slightly stronger case for giving it back to natives Maidu Indians (depending on the facts of acquisition), but they arent.
They recently changed that, they famously reported a 30+ billion dollar profit last year.
People who live in Tahoe would love to have a word with you about how terrible the typical Tesla driver is during ski season, but ok. For snow driving, you're going to want something more practical, and snow tires.
Self-driving in Europe is more problematic in a couple of ways.

Firstly the road structure is very different to the US, streets are much narrower and less car-centric so models are harder to train; secondly regulating it is much harder because the EU is a collection of countries, which is very different to a collection of states.

Thirdly non-car alternatives like trains and ebikes are a lot more viable due to a higher population density, many big cities (such as Paris) are pushing for better cycling infrastructure rather than better layouts for cars.
Double negative makes you sound like a bot.
My first thought too. The articles basic premise is something like:

"People don't like the new film, but the old film may contain more CGI than they thought, so they're wrong."

Who would come up with such a premise unless they were in a corner, and being paid?
The US has 280m with half the population.
> If you are using WebAssembly in a web browser then you are good, WASI does not concern you.

In case you absolutely do not care for WASI but love WebAssembly for the web.
The advantage to 2.5Gb/s is that you can run it over reasonable lengths of existing crappy cable jobs about as well as 1Gb/s Ethernet without angry customers yelling blaming you because it doesn't work. sigh
I've been in the room when it happened. In one memorable incident, a junior trader I sat opposite bought 100 bn Japanese Yen instead of 10 bn. His excuse? "I lost track of the zeros". We'd only hired the guy because he had a PhD and "PhD's are smart" - lol. In his defense the UI was awful. He left soon after...
Thanks for the feedback.

I was wrong about debug vs release; It's the difference between 4.0MB & 893KB on a ~500 LOC rust codebase (per cloc).

I want to observe that your suggestions don't undermine or refute my point about problems that WASM adoption faces. This serves to underline that the developer experience needs work. Opinions may differ on how much. Also that "developer experience" runs on multiple axes of concern (bin size, perf, accessibility, utility of language, etc).
That seems a bit dubious. What makes you say that?

The reason I ask is that, as I understand it, the collection happens via cellular modems talking to cell towers to report back to the mothership; it's not through, e.g., connecting your smartphone via bluetooth. (The non-smartphone information they send is about car usage habits and statistics, including location.) I'd be curious what the make/model of the car is which doesn't have this hardware.

The sibling comment about the 2013 model is more likely since I don't know when manufacturers started putting cellular modems in their cars. "Brand new", not so much.
A) "surely nobody has ever thought of [this] before]" says person who hasn't read https://xeiaso.net/shitposts/no-way-to-prevent-this/

B) It's a spin on The Onion headline about school shootings.
Trying to balance my bleeding heart and pro capitalism free market proclivities…

Let the market decide how much employees get paid and increase taxes on corporations to fund a social safety net and remove loopholes. Also make any state tax incentives that a state gives a corporation to locate there taxable on the federal level.
I think silnik translates most directly to powerplant in English, given that the root word is siła.
The politicians are paid by the capitalists to keep minimum wages low.
I believe this is current precedent around scraping:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HiQ_Labs_v._LinkedIn
Alarms are easy for a single person to add.

The better solution is to redesign / engineer systems which automatically solve the alarm condition so no person needs to know about the alarm. That usually requires many people to work together and requires far more complexity to solve, both initially and in ongoing upkeep.
https://engineering.mit.edu/engage/ask-an-engineer/whats-the... by the way...
I almost can't tell if you're trolling. If we look at quality of life metrics like the percentage of work hours required to rent or buy housing, then it takes about 1.5 times more hours worked to live today than it did in the 1990s when I was a young adult:

https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2018/05/raw-data-rent...

https://www.manausa.com/blog/wage-inflation-home-affordabili... see "Wage-Adjusted Monthly Mortgage Payments" section

Because housing costs keep going up while median wages have been stagnant since the turn of the millennium:

https://www.cbpp.org/blog/census-income-rent-gap-grew-in-201...

The last affordable years were around 1994 before the internet arrived, 2012 during the middle of Obama's terms and maybe 2020 during the pandemic.

But we've had so much corporate greed inflation to save the rich from losing any money for the 2 years that workers took off during covid-19 that any income gains by labor have been completely wiped out. $15 hourly wage? What a joke.

Sure, we have fancier video games, smart phones and even passable AI. But I can tell you straight up that in 1994 we had no concept for the level of anxiety that people live under today. I feel awful for young people born after that who think that whatever all this is is how it always was.

Had wages kept up with inflation and trickle-down economics not happened, so that the wealthy paid their fair share of taxes and we had the government services we're due like free public education and healthcare, the inflation-adjusted median US income would be twice what it was in 1994 and 3-4 times what it was in the 1970s. Well over the $70,000 mark where happiness peaks and more money provides diminishing returns. In other words, we could work for 3 months of the year and more than afford everything we have now, including savings and retirements. But the wealthy keep us down and divided because the highest profits come from struggle and war.

The financialization of tech under the Stanford model widens wealth inequality. I can't even imagine how many things would be fully automated and approaching free by now had the MIT model kept the pace of true innovation at 1960s and 1980s levels in areas like pharmaceuticals, genetics, miniaturization and other pure research. Instead we have 2 day shipping and privatized space travel, which are cool and everything, but people are homeless and dying of starvation all around the world and on our watch in proxy wars. Words like travesty don't even begin to capture how far astray we've gone.
I have seen nothing that indicates that Mercedes stands a chance to catch up with Tesla.

All I have seen Mercedes do could have been accomplished by manual programming. But manual programming does not scale. Look at the progress Tesla made from FSD 11 to FSD 12. Nothing indicates that Mercedes is capable of this type of progress.
> ... knows that the person sending this is a person that is using the library, and so any more work they do is helping this person.

Something mentioned in the email message is private members of an interface. If they do abandon the project, then I suppose that whoever wrote that can make them public safely since there is not a new version, it is unlikely to break compatibility with newer versions if there aren't any. So, maybe abandoning this project, does possibly help them.

(This is not any kind of excuse for writing such a bad message nor a reason for continuing to maintain the project; it is just an observation.)
Jeff Bezos founded Amazon 30 years ago and is now worth more than $200 billion. So he has personally gained about $7 billion per year on average, heavily loaded toward more recent years.

If you expand consideration from just him to all of Amazon's major shareholders, top management, board members, etc., and then compare to the warehouse workers, "contractor" delivery drivers, etc., it's plain to see that a large group who does most of the work ends up begging for scraps while a small owner elite collects the lion's share of the rewards.

The way the power relations work is not fundamentally all that different from a feudal peasant society divided between peasants and nobles, though thankfully it's quite a bit less physically violent.
Cool site, I've never tried Clojure before. My first reaction though is that (+ 1 1) is a highly unconventional and possibly confusing way of writing 1+1, and I'm not sure why that design choice came about.
I think any NPC with dialogue important to a goal (a quest, a tutorial, etc) is going to be hard to use generative AI for. It not only needs to be coherent with the story, but it needs to correctly include certain ideas. I.e. if the NPC gives a quest to go find some item at some location, it needs to say what the item is and where it is.

I think we're currently stuck in a local minima where AI isn't up to the task of making a coherent player-interactable world, but an incoherent or fragmented and non-interactable world isn't impressive enough (like No Man's Sky).
More people simply don't care at all.

They're like uber expensive phones, whatever you buy will be a piece of shit in 10 years anyways, why would you spend 50k on a piece of shit when you can buy another one for 5k

I recently rented a modern car and god damn besides being able to control the back windows from the front seat it was all gimmick tier gadgets
If workers need government aid to make basic ends meet, it is the employer, not the employee, that is on welfare, subsidized by taxpayers and government borrowing.
Suppose we could try grabbing one of the hundreds of abandoned generators floating around Northern Russia.

https://bellona.org/news/nuclear-issues/radioactive-waste-an...
How Do Random Credentials Mysteriously Appear [in the Browser]?
There are lots of new shells around that does support everything you’re describing. Eg:

- nushell

- elvish (was featured on HN recently)

- powershell

- murex (disclaimer: I’m the author of that one)
AmbientGPT: GPT-4 and Local models with full ambient knowledge of your screen
This is strange to hear. Model 3s are the cheapest used electric cars in my area, and with FSD included they look very tempting.

The only disadvantage I see compared to other electrics is the bad turning radius.
Mmm...BYD and Geely are going to come as a shock when they arrive to your neck of the woods. :)
the real question is how many backups do your carry in case the first one doesn't work, and I'm not asking about credit card point games
It is news worthy because TSLA’s current P/E is 45 even after the stock is down 28% YTD.

For comparison GM’s PE is 5 and Ford’s is 12.

So when the company, whose stock is so expensive compared to others in the industry, and is predicated on taking the world over with their cars, doesn’t grow as expected then yes it is indeed scary.
I wonder if Ractor will benefit Rails sometime in the future?
If you use Neovim, you could try Conjure.

I really like it for other lisps, but I haven’t used it for Common Lisp. I wouldn’t say it “contorts buffers in a bizarre way,” although in my experience, different Vim users have their own take on that.
There's an efficiency rating for EVs, basically best bang for buck per kWh. Tesla has ranked in the top consistently, thus saving you some more money on electric bill.
It isn't even pure bash, if it uses external commands like `bc` and `sed`. It should probably limit itself to posix shell (or bash, if they need to) and coreutils.

They are only listing `bc` and `bash` as a prerequisite, but the example uses `sed`, so this is also not complete. So a full list of all required tools would be the first step.

But I am working on embedded systems where I write lots of POSIX shell scripts that run in tiny initramfs, etc. so I am very picky with my dependencies. If I had a better language to target busybox, that would be welcome as well.
Arena can be used to allocate many times but deallocate exactly once. In Zig:

test "arena allocator" {
var arena = std.heap.ArenaAllocator.init(std.heap.page_allocator);
defer arena.deinit();
const allocator = arena.allocator();

_ = try allocator.alloc(u8, 1);
_ = try allocator.alloc(u8, 10);
_ = try allocator.alloc(u8, 100);
}
This is what I meant.

Or in this particular case, if the landowners are so stubborn that they can not even allow for a road crossing their land, they could at least hint at the idea?
See S Expressions:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-expression
And yet billions of miles have been driven on FSD, there is no epidemic of mowing down school children, and Tesla is ranked as having the best automatic emergency braking in the industry ( https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoetsier/2022/09/07/tesla-m... )
Just pushed a fix out; it's not perfect but i hope it works for now. Let me know if it's better for you!