skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You're sensationalising a little.

The abort button on Apollo 14 would at worst have rendezvouzed the lander with the orbiter prior to landing on the moon. It would have killed the mission, but definitely not the astronauts.

The brownout also had several safe abort alternatives and the question was only ever about how to continue the mission, not how to save people.
You're missing the point entirely: framing the swarm as "covering interstellar distances" is misleading and betrays a certain naivete in thinking about space travel that compromises the reporting on this plan.
Nature article: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-58887-x

Produced water is from 100-200 ppm Li (median in SW or NE PA, respectively).

Estimated this could yield a few thousands tons of Li a year, which isn't that much.
> I'd just disable script evaluation if you don't specifically need that.

This vuln works even with scripting in PDF.js disabled.
I recently went to an interview where I was asked some specifics where the real-life answer is "I'd Google and have and answer in 30 seconds". I'm very curious as to whether this will be held against me...

But they also did give me what I thought was quite a good test, which was talking through some working code and suggesting how it could be improved.
That is not the problem. Its that a technology designed in the 1960s for a 1960s workforce and tool base can't be made in the USA today, for the same reason that you can't produce cost-effective Browning HPs in Belgium today https://arstechnica.com/science/2013/04/how-nasa-brought-the...
Good idea, nothing wrong with including a QR code on the first page. Would serve as a Rosetta Stone for other QRs if specification gets lost.
Yeah, that's what I thought. I didn't want to assume, but it's the same in my Volt, if the 12V goes bad, the locks don't open. That said, it's trivial to get around that.

Definitely just rage bait here.
I've only been in the industry for about that long. :)
Hello there, it's Anders Larsson here with a must-see video for anyone interested in the world of online influence and digital content creation. The title of my latest eye-opening piece is "Top influencers link from what? Reality!!! Let's find out," and believe me, it's packed with insider insights you won't want to miss. So, why should you pay attention to this video?

First, don't fall into the trap of recycled content within the infamous 'influencer bubble.' We dive deep into the reality that many don't explore. If you're feeling lost or overwhelmed by the masses of content that doesn't seem to break new ground, this video might help cut through the noise.

The secret? I've done the research for you, determining exactly how top YouTubers create links and traffic outside of the common platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. There are different ways to forge paths on the internet, and here are my key takeaways from actual data on what works. Those that are interested in not just following trends but leading the charge need to consider hurdles that require determination and perseverance.

This means that by watching this video, which allows you to learn from my journey, you can understand the importance of creating sustainable streams of passive income through smarter linking strategies. As a digital content creator, it is important that you know the audience is telling me that I screwed up and I can use that feedback to improve—and exactly how you can do the same.

Important thing to note is that instead of cycling through the same advice, this video reveals links from fresher and potentially more effective domains. Those hidden gems that can propel you to the front of the line, yielding more views and subscribers. Lots of gems here that can help you not just follow the crowd, but to lead it.

I also share my thoughts on a fantastic educational platform I use, offering insights into online marketing, how to start your business, and create content that resonates and provides pure value.

So why am I sharing this? Because real, actionable, data-driven advice is vital for long-term success in this digital landscape. However, let's be real, there's no alchemy here, it's all about putting in the work to generate those sustainable streams of passive income. And everything you need to get started is embedded in the rich content of this video.

So grab a cup of coffee and get ready to discover the underlying patterns that govern online success. Check out my free video training—below is the link to it in the description—and don't hesitate to leave a comment with a key takeaway from this video. Your interaction not only supports my channel but also furthers our shared journey towards digital fluency and independence.

Remember, if you like what you hear, hit the like button, subscribe, and join me as we unravel the tapestry of online influence and chart a course towards true digital proficiency. Take care, stay safe, and I'll see you in the next video. Bye for now!
Ah thanks. My understanding was the whole epsilon-delta stuff one typically learns in a first course in analysis was due to Cauchy.
> It's still murder if somehow you arrange it so a million people pulled the trigger.

Lots of Countries/Government have gotten away with it, though.
Yeah, upon reflection, I'm not sure if my suggestion is the best.

Just, the default subservient, sexy female assistant doesn't help this technology's inclusivity.
Not a surprise, high-performance people run into all kinds of obstacles in an average or low-skill workplace.

Others in the company simply putting in a basic 9-5 don't necessarily appreciate raised expectations or a higher throughput. Managers/execs enjoying fruits of expensive 3rd party contracts (travel, dinners, kickbacks) push back hard when the high-performer suggests doing those tasks/functions internally. Colleagues, even if well-meaning, may not be able to "keep up" or worse, make the same mistakes repeatedly. Getting support from other departments can be very difficult due to "how we've always done it" or "not how we do things here" syndromes. Mismatched levels of effort or motivation among team members. Etc etc, the list is nearly endless, but they all usually lead towards the high performer looking for work elsewhere.
Especially in more modern Java, a huge problem of checked exceptions is that they are not parametrizable. So you can't (easily) call map(list, foo) if foo throws an unchecked exception, since map() doesn't throw, and there is no way to make map() throw conditionally.
Take for example man pages, I find the very comfy to read. And they have generous margins on both sides.
About indenting, I try to avoid deep nesting, usually 3 is a maximum, very rare to need more, if the code has to be easy to read.
Intel has been doing "tick-tock" for almost 20 years - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tick%E2%80%93tock_model
Take some of their IP and make it public. That'll do it.
You can make an MVP:

It doesn't support up or down scaling or recoding. Force the user to only upload supported file formats and codex.

Minimal hosting by forcing viewers to also upload: the WebTorrent protocol is ideal for this.

Why ads at all? Those already exist. It's an ideal now platform to try out micropayments. Look at http://value4value.io for example.

If this starts to roll, only then you scale.
Creando UNA Página DE Perfil Privada Para Usuarios Registrados
up to (non-)unique isomorphism
We as Soviet Russia ? The lost more than 20 million.people to beat the Nazis without that sacrifice Europe would be lost
I've been mulling over using an ARM Mac mini as a media server and TV emulation box lately. It seems to fit the bill quite well.

- Quiet and compact

- Excellent single threaded performance

- Ryujinx supposedly runs extremely well due to ARM virtualization

- Typical downsides like expensive RAM/storage matter less for this use case.

- Good integrated GPU
I don't know about North Korea, but in my part of the former USSR housing was very much attainable for normal people. Much more so than today, actually. You didn't have to wait in the queue for more than 3-5 years to get one, and you definitely didn't have to get a mortgage and then part with most of your salary for the next 20 years. Pretty much everybody I know got 1-3 room apartments for free, including my parents.
Or, this is being used as an excuse to cut people because replit cannot afford to keep them after making missteps.

The frequent changes to pricing and extremely restricted free tier have been pretty off putting, at least among people I know.

It seems like you need to go all in on a paid account if you want to try using replit, and also the exact pricing on that plan may change every ~3 months.
And also against multiple leaders of Hamas.

It's also quite obvious how the crimes of Israeli officials pale in comparison with the ones from the Hamas in that publication.
BYD seems to in London from 2015

[2015] There is no capital cost for London's first five pure-electric double deck buses on route 98 as these are being introduced as part of a lease agreement with the manufacturer BYD.

https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-do...
If you want to read about the process and not the tooling, go straight to the paper mentioned in the article: https://research.google/pubs/modern-code-review-a-case-study...
> It doesn't matter how cheap a launch becomes. I have to support an astronaut with food.

So, if it were to be as cheap to go into space as to go to St. Louis, sending a person would make no sense because of... food? This makes no sense.

Obviously there is some breakpoint at which it would make sense. You can't just handwave and say that universally without doing arithmetic.
TFA reports a maximum write amplification factor of 3.75, which puts you in different ballgame territory altogether.
There is some prior art on using liquids for logic gates.

See the 3-bit Hydro-pneumatic Adder.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qP9HfUOCN4
"When is one thing equal to some other thing?"

Barry Mazur
June 12, 2007

https://bpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.harvard.edu/dist/a/189/f...

https://people.math.osu.edu/cogdell.1/6112-Mazur-www.pdf
The land itself has to be fertile that's why the moon-belt is called like that and is currently where most of the wheat (in europe at least) is being produced. This process happened over thousands of years and is not easy to 'move' or 'prepare' land like that.

New regions would struggle to cultivate new land without fertilizers and the current fertilizer sector would struggle to operate (current sector is built around the availability of ammonia as far as I'm aware).

Your best bets would yes: Siberia, Canada. But it would take maybe few millennia before that land could be used for agriculture and it would effectively become the new oil of the world sparking a new wave of conflicts as I mentioned before.

Our current food supply could be destroyed in decades not millennia given enough heatwaves and other natural events.
"Can" go fast. Usually it won't. And in most cases, you can't revamp the whole hiring process, and mostly need to work with what you've got.
Nothing says "making an aggressive push" like reducing headcount.
>PNG will normally get at least 2:1 compression on photos

"At least"? I tried with the first photo on the wikipedia home page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:City_Building_Champaign_I...

Saving it as a 24-bit bmp (ie. uncompressed) gets me 12,180KB. Saving it as a PNG gets me 7,157KB, which is 1.7:1
Opus seems to be much better at that. Probably why it’s so much more expensive. AI companies have to balance costs. I wonder if the public has even seen the most powerful, full fidelity models, or if they are too expensive to run.
The obvious ones would be Visual Studio and Eclipse.
Doesn't SAP have a workflow for that?
I recommend you actually try it. While it sounded like this in the demo, it's not actually the default in the app.

The default sounds gender-neutral to me, or at least not very feminine, and it matches your tone, so it's "sexy" if you're being "sexy".

That said I think we all agree the demo was awful.
Right, that is correct, it is what I meant to say. I’m not sure that moves the needle much as far as risk goes though.
It is a strange hypothesis. Living under a rock and avoiding sun exposure might kill you before you are able to reproduce. But, if you get past that point you will live long life under said rock.
That's a test for the 'rules-based order', and of course, the West will absolutely discredit itself and make an absolute joke of it, while indirectly justifying the behavior of people like Putin.
0.02€ per request cron request ?
"Why would Google forego a potential source of revenue."

Things like morality and ethics don't play a part in what these big corporations do. There's only profit and loss. If it's illegal, but they will make more than they lose in fines, they'll take the profit. If it's legal, but loses them money, they won't do it.

They're in Russia because it makes them money. If it didn't make them money, they wouldn't be there. This is the framework our society has created within which corporations operate. We could do better, but probably won't, because fixing things like this require time, resources, and coordinating dozens or even hundreds of competing incentives and thousands of relevant actors.

You can stop using Google products. You can advocate for others to do so. More than that is probably not the most effective use of your time. Besides, in ten years, Google might not be around - they've been notoriously unreliable for anything other than gmail, youtube, and search, and have recently dropped the ball, and to me, look like has-been hacks in the AI space.
> Given this definition, it’s clear that artificial systems cannot feel empathy. They do not know what it’s like to feel something. This means that they cannot fulfil the congruence condition. Consequently, the question of whether what they feel corresponds to the asymmetry and other-awareness condition does not even arise. What artificial systems can do is recognise emotions, be it on the basis of facial expressions, vocal cues, physiological patterns or affective meanings; and they can simulate empathic behaviour by ways of speech or other modes of emotional expression.

Artificial systems hence show similarities to what common sense calls a psychopath.

Ugh. That's so much motivated reasoning, it might start to fall in the "not even wrong" category. I have seen the same semantic trick before, to declare - purely by playing with definitions, without any empirical observations - that animals cannot have emotions.

A lot of the vocabulary around consciousness and emotions is defined on top of human subjective experiences, simply because those are the only ones we have access to and where we definitely know they exist. However, this means that those terms are literally only applicable to humans and not animals (or AI), because we literally only define them for humans. That's the core problematic of the "we don't know what's it like to be a bat" essay and the reasons we have words like "nociception" to describe "neurological pain responses" in animals without making any implications about any subjective experience of pain.

It's important to stress that none of that means that we'd know that animals don't feel pain or don't have emotions or don't have conscious thought, etc. It just means that the terms become un-applicable to animals for formal reasons. However, the confusion between saying we don't (and possibly can't ever) know and we know they don't is often a very convenient one, especially if you wanted to inflict things on animals that would definitely cause pain and suffering if they had a consciousness.

For animals, the situation has luckily somewhat changed in the last decades and more scientists are calling for instead adopting the assumption that (many) animals do have a consciousness - not a human one, but one that is comparable to humans in core aspects, such as to experience pain. (See "Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness")

I feel we're at a similar danger with AI: I don't want to say that LLMs have consciousness - and we can be sure they don't have human consciousness, that's impossible from the way the work. However, the article confuses a lot of "don't know"/"not applicable" with "we know they don't" (and then brings a number of other terms into the mix, that, paradoxically, would require human consciousness to even be applicable) to conclude something like psychopathy.

You don't have to buy into any and all AGI fantasies, but this is intellectually dishonest.
Apollo 13 also had severe pogo on launch. Obviously it's overshadowed by the unrelated oxygen tank issues later, but that mission actually got extremely lucky that the oscillations happened to occur in such a way that the computer noticed the issue and shut down the affected engine. That could easily not have been the case, and if the oscillations had continued for a few more seconds it would have destroyed the vehicle.
Wow - I can't believe I didn't see that perspective before posting. Thanks!
> I tried everything to make it more tolerable, and hot water was by far the best. The effect didn't last forever, but it was remarkable how it a) was actually pleasurable and b) muted the itchiness

I've been thinking of a "low fantasy" story, which is actually Sci-fi under the covers. In it, the "fey" characters are just indigenous people who have immunity to a plant which is similar to poison oak, but which grows in nigh impenetrable hedge like clumps and walls. Your mention of hot water for relief gave me an idea for a story beat, where another character discovers the hot water effect, and simultaneously discovers how to infiltrate the "fey" character's territory and bathing practices similar to Japanese and Finnish bathing.
Another great release!

Looking forward to seeing benchmarks of the new JIT optimizations.
As the article says, there are actually laws that require internal research that shows a product may be harmful to be made available to the EPA. That just doesn't do anything if the company either lies, or the EPA doesn't end up taking it seriously. As is often the case, the mechanism is there. The politics are not.
https://youtu.be/MgNItWdfEIU?si=QGZbjRIh50InkiHV

Context: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Your_Name
In exactly what way does it sound like that? Did coffee companies find out that about a asprin's weight of coffee grounds would kill a monkey, and suppress that information?

Or is it because just because that you think it's not important that a study found that some aspect of coffee could cause cancer in rats, and you also don't care about studies about PFOAs, so they're the same?
Can relate. My in-vehicle SW is driving for 20 years and counting (and it is not just some standard AutoSar stuff but high performance video processing pre "A" "I" ;) ). When I see cars with it I always remember some funny anecdotes and good fellas that I was lucky to share some journey with. Making a durable dent feels satisfying for sure, but also doing "cyber physical" projects and moving real things around.
I actually was put off by the know-it-all nature of the whole thing as if nasa scientists had totally not considered any of this.
Exceptions are meant to represent exceptional states.

The data is always expected to be valid and there is no recovery? .Parse

The data may be invalid and the implementation can handle it? .TryParse

This is a very common pattern and adopted for reasons besides the cost of exceptions. Though in this case it is Uri.TryCreate instead.
HN's automatic title worsener strikes again.

Apparently the theory is that the word "How" in titles is always meaningless clickbait so HN automatically removes it. I don't believe this actually improves things.
OpenXPS (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_XML_Paper_Specification), DjVu (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DjVu).
But the cloud providers compete with other other! Look at the efficient market in display in their bandwidth pricing!
Oh. For comments I think would be ok, if it is a comment by itself, and not needed to particularly understand a piece of code, like in a headers. Still links are much more volatile than the codebases I work with. But I understand that may not hold in many many others setups.
Nothing custom, so it must be on a list somewhere.

edit - it doesn't have to really be blocking the actual post here even, if their loading code breaks when some other tracking code doesn't run, that could explain it.
Uber must have picked up some Google rejects. This type of homegrown project was seen at Google all the time.

Usually to aim for a significant promotion.

“Designed and built homegrown system to save $Xm! Give me promo, bro?”

Just so happened to ignore that it took X+Y additional to build. Also it will probably be going to the G graveyard in a few years.
So, Hamas and the Israeli Govt (in the Occupied Palestinian Territories of Gaza and West Bank) are essentially two sides of the same terrorist coin?

> crimes of Israeli officials pale in comparison...

A killer is a killer. I mean, in my eyes, there's no significant difference between the evil of Jeffrey Dahmer and Lucy Letby.
Personally I'm for a "captialistic death penalty", where if you've done something sufficiently bad, you get sentenced to work the night shift at McDonalds for the rest of your life.
I've encountered this kind of poor encapsulation in other open source projects quite frequently. It's often one of the main blockers to contributing, for me.

Congratulations to AntennaPod for spending three years to clean this up.
As far as I remember, that's not a problem in math:

:= definition
≡ identity
= equality
∝ proportionality
The number of times a group has created/approved something that immediately has a flaw found by the first person it is shown that is not in the group is something that I'd love to see hard numbers. It has to be very high. It's like group think takes over and nobody can think critically about it, and all sorts of things slip through. It's even more embarrassing when you do have subject matter experts already employed within the company that were either not discussed with or worse ignored.

The most common example is from marketing where there is something that nobody notices until the internet noticed, or when a foreign company releases internationalized copy by someone that is not a native speaker so that the translation is nonsensical jibberish.
The disclosure was in the public interest.

I'm trying to avoid the strong feelings pro and con the person.
A build your own algorithm laboratory sounds fun.

I think “motivating the problem” (a phrase I hear a lot in American lectures) is often the weakest part of an algorithm and data structure course. The teaching approaches seem quite abstract, or make passing mention to practical problems.

Personally I find algorithms a bit boring in the abstract. I’ve always wondered why DSA projects are so rarely things like “Here’s a simple database that doesn’t support indexes. We’re going to query it and it will be painful. Then you’ll extend the database with a b-tree index.”