skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thank you for the kind words!

In my experience, and not only with that instance, power defers to power. An unruly child's pleadings will never prevail over his parents that are really good at making themselves appear as victims (http://www.issendai.com/psychology/estrangement/missing-miss...). Or as famous lawyer Gerry Spence said, "the gentleman of the bar is there for the other gentleman of the bar".

Also, let's not deny it, I was not a nice and adults would not be nice in return and I would respond in kind. I was a reflection of what was going at home. This makes other adults not want to be nice at all. I can't count the times where I was told "oops, we forgot to bring one for you" or something along those lines.
In a similar fashion a choir where you pull on lips, more of a gag page though.
https://www.adultswim.com/etcetera/choir/
There were a lot of good reasons why Putin shouldn't have invaded Ukraine either. Yet Putin had been making shows of aggression and threats to invade, while securing his political position in Russia for a decade. You can see that Xi had been pursuing similar moves. I'm not sure autocrats see things as reasonably as you do.
This was fascinating to me.

Also, I was apparently using my own personal definition of "engine" that was somewhat different than the other modern usage.

To me, a "motor" is something that translates energy into motion. An "engine" is something that translates energy into work. So a motor is a kind of engine, and uses of "engine" in knowledge work is an analogy.
Recent example of a proof regarding theoretical limitations of Transformers: https://aclanthology.org/2023.tacl-1.31.pdf (also extended to cover SSMs https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.08819)
Yeah, I saw that and would probably say that the penalty for straw purchasing should be stiffer. But the question was about the manufacturers.
> Inequality isn't the correct term. It's poverty, drug abuse and mental illness.

...relative to others with less of that; hence an inequality.
Silly comment. Awk is nonstandardized, different in different environments. Perl5 is the same everywhere. don't you recall that that's actually the main reason perl was invented, as a more powerful and more uniformly compatible replacement for awk?
They're going for a style, just because SJ declined, should not mean they cannot pursue something similar. The fact they went to SJ in the first place means they had good intentions of getting a well founded voice.

Likely a voice professional can detect clear differences, as it's not convincing to be SJ from an outsider.
Germany during 1933-1945 never claimed to be something else than Germany, the name change happened in 1980s.

Why there is no Nazi Italy?
For what it's worth, I'm mostly in agreement with you that contemporary therapy is overrated. I did have one quibble:

> Somehow, humans managed to get by for thousands of years without any of this stuff.

In fact, and this is especially true for men, the correct response to this line of reasoning is basically "well, actually, no they didn't." The genetic lineages of most men over the entirety of human history, are extinct - we are descended from the comparative few who aren't. For example Ötzi the iceman (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%96tzi) has no living descendants. He is typical.

Not only that, but there is no reason to think that the surviving genetic lineages are remotely optimized for individual happiness, or for that matter individual industriousness or productivity (esp in the context of modern productive relations) or whatever other metric you want to measure people by.

All of which is to say, that even accounting for the fact that basically most people who ever lived have no living descendants, we just don't value, individually or collectively, even the attributes that would have been selected for among human populations in the bronze age, neolithic, whatever. So if we want to make those things happen (i.e. if we want people to be happy and productive) we need to create the conditions for it and we need to give them significant help in doing so, as well. That "significant help" is probably going to be something like what we call "therapy" today - though, as I mentioned above, I think contemporary therapeutic practices are doing a horrible job at it. But, there is a job to do there, IMO.
How does this help though? Why should we stick to old software? Why advocate for inertia?
Hey this was also the first fluid sim paper I ever implemented! I haven't done any grid-based simulations (except maybe the classic "Real-Time Fluid Dynamics for Games" by Jos Stam), but I've been able to greatly improve compressibility by using "Position-Based Fluids" by Miles Macklin. Someday I'll dive into WebGPU and post a JS version on HN...

Short clip of my implementation here: https://imgur.com/a/2IARiBq

I like the different fluids in your sim though, I may try that myself.
People who find the tool to do the work for them will be fine. I remember “learning” to use Mathematica so I could easily complete copious calculus assignments and homework in high school.

It didn’t keep me from learning the material - a lot of those assignments and problem sets were simply busy work — but did improve ho much free time I had to read and surf the net and learn new tech things.
Tried to install via brew on an M2 and got:

mactop: The arm64 architecture is required for this software.
Error: mactop: An unsatisfied requirement failed this build.
I don’t understand why you say it doesn’t need AI. It’s like saying a financial application doesn’t need a database. Maybe it can use something else, but who cares what technology is used as long as it’s good? I’m willing to believe that AI is making this tech much more effective
maybe this is outdated prejudice at this point but I learned early that perl as a language is fine, right up until you need to deal with scripts someone else wrote. particularly scripts written in anger.
Check out https://tomlehrersongs.com/albums/ - he put all his works into public domain.
AFAIK, the remote applications simply do an isatty() check on the stdout and that's it; a proper terminal is then apparently expected to correctly skip and quietly ignore any OSC sequence it does not understand. See the source of ls [0], for example.

[0] https://github.com/coreutils/coreutils/blob/2a72cf1e9959f40b...
00106 template<typename _InputIterator, typename _Tp, typename _BinaryOperation>
00107 _Tp
00108 accumulate(_InputIterator __first, _InputIterator __last, _Tp __init,
00109 _BinaryOperation __binary_op)
00110 {
00111 // concept requirements
00112 __glibcxx_function_requires(_InputIteratorConcept<_InputIterator>)
00113 __glibcxx_requires_valid_range(__first, __last);
00114
00115 for (; __first != __last; ++__first)
00116 __init = __binary_op(__init, *__first);
00117 return __init;
00118 }

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/libstdc++-html-USERS-4.0/stl__numeric_8h-source.html#l00108

It's just a loop.

The compiler is doing all of the same transformations regardless of whether you use the higher order function or just write a loop yourself.

--------------

_STD_BEGIN
_EXPORT_STD template <class _InIt, class _Ty, class _Fn>
_NODISCARD _CONSTEXPR20 _Ty accumulate(const _InIt _First, const _InIt _Last, _Ty _Val, _Fn _Reduce_op) {
// return noncommutative and nonassociative reduction of _Val and all in [_First, _Last), using _Reduce_op
_STD _Adl_verify_range(_First, _Last);
auto _UFirst = _STD _Get_unwrapped(_First);
const auto _ULast = _STD _Get_unwrapped(_Last);
for (; _UFirst != _ULast; ++_UFirst) {
#if _HAS_CXX20
_Val = _Reduce_op(_STD move(_Val), *_UFirst);
#else // ^^^ _HAS_CXX20 / !_HAS_CXX20 vvv
_Val = _Reduce_op(_Val, *_UFirst);
#endif // ^^^ !_HAS_CXX20 ^^^
}
return _Val;
}

https://github.com/microsoft/STL/blob/63354c3fa9c1fb2ab1fccb58c47d23c6af1c290f/stl/inc/numeric#L24

Also just a loop in MS' standard lib.
A voice cannot be copyrighted. Altman was being courteous and professional by trying to sign a deal with her. But, he didn't have to and could have used a variation of her voice.

>The voice of Sky is not Scarlett Johansson's, and it was never intended to resemble hers,” Altman told Forbes in a statement. “We cast the voice actor behind Sky's voice before any outreach to Ms. Johansson.

>Days before OpenAI demonstrated its new, flirty voice assistant last week, the actress Scarlett Johansson said, Sam Altman, the company’s chief executive, called her agent and asked that she consider licensing her voice for a virtual assistant.

>It was his second request to the actress in the past year, Ms. Johansson said in a statement on Monday, adding that the reply both times was no.
The risk is in losing control of the narrative. That's all the top brass actually cares about. As you mentioned we already have deepfakes, spam, etc. and the world hasn't imploded.
Show HN: Animate your photos into motion videos
Simply upload your image(s) and pick the desired motion settings to create eye-catching videos!

We are launching our AI creators platform and would love to hear your feedback on. You will have free credits once you sign up to explore various capabilities. Motion settings include shape, range, length, and loops. You can also try AI motions with optional text prompt and quantity so you can iterate faster. Furthermore, we provide a batch form where businesses & creators can drop their entire images’ catalog and process them at scale saving them a lot of time and cost.

Let us know what you think and how we can improve to serve your needs!

We also provide API to simply integrate our image animation capabilities in businesses' creation pipelines, apps, and websites. Please reach out to me to give you early access to test from within your system.
Video: Chevy Colorado's Headlight Controls Are Deeply Frustrating UI
Touch screen selections are manadatory.
Will pay attention to this for sure.
>My theory is that it had to do with pg praising him so publicly—I think it evoked a "why him and not me?" feeling in readers. The weird-ironic thing is that the complaint has only grown as Sam has achieved more...running OpenAI through the biggest tech boom since the iPhone is...rather obviously massive. I think if Sam unifies gravity into quantum theory, brokers peace in the middle east, and cures cancer, we'll still be hearing these complaints—because they're not really grounded either in objective achievement or lack of it. It's some kind of second-order phenomenon, and actually rather interesting. At least if you aren't Sam!

You're right, posting this was a bad idea. It reads like a "neener neener you're just jealous" defense of someone you happen to like.
The biggest problem is that they were making insinuations that it was intentionally similar to her role in the movie Her (and even contacted her directly to do it).

There are laws for unauthorized use of likeness that could possibly apply here.
What is a government, if not the cabinet that forms it?
If your team is small, fossil is perfect.

https://fossil-scm.org/

(it's mentioned in the article)
I think the pm changing is a new government in the legal sense or whatever since they have to go to the head of state saying they have the confidence of Parliament to form a government. There has only been 3 governments since 2019. The past 10 years have been a bit chaotic in UK standards. 2004-2014 had three different prime ministers with like 2 or more elections (I don't remember when the second Labour one was)
I kind of like this idea but I’d prefer it only applied to commercial land owners or very large personal land holdings.

It would suck to buy a couple acre plot to get away from the city and constantly have people camping or hiking on your land.
it's because this, like the ATF's program "Fast and the Furious," is an underhanded play to disarm Americans and deny them of their 2nd Amendment rights through extralegal means. It's mentioned right in TFA!

>From 2006-2011 [federal] agents in Arizona stood down as straw purchasers illegally bought 2,000 guns at shops, intending to use the information to track trafficking patterns and arrest the kingpins. However, agents didn’t deliver the high-level arrests – and in the process, they lost track of hundreds of guns.

>Hundreds of Fast and Furious firearms have previously been traced to other shootings in Mexico. The new leak indicates hundreds more are still being found.

US government sells guns to cartels to prove that guns are being sold to cartels, then sues manufacturers. And people wonder why the country has lost faith in its leaders.
Heh... Yeah, I'm against the "shut up and calculate" mentality of the Copenhagen Interpretation.

Perhaps it's a problem with the science communication and less with the scientific community, but it seems like an often cited impetus for the science is supposed to be this overweening need to eliminate a negative association instead of to explain or satisfy curiosity.
I currently have a firefox -p shortcut, but it's auch worse experience than on chrome and friends.
My ideal "right to roam" laws would be
1) you have the right to pass through any piece of land
2) you have to stay x amount of meters away from a house/building/etc
3) you have the right to camp for one night in a spot and you can't have a tent pitched until one hour before sunset and it must be down by one hour after sunrise. There should probably be an even further minimum distance from a house compared to the distance set for just passing by.
4) no fires / pack it in, pack it out / etc

There's a bunch of places in Europe now that have a no camping policy, but allow (or tolerate) "bivouacking", which originally meant sleeping on the ground without a shelter but now kind of includes small tents. I think it's the ideal tradeoff, it still allows long distance backpackers to do their thing while discouraging the "party camping" crowds.
Good thing you’re not the only user with an opinion
As a follow up I am curious as to whether the topic of eugenics was central to the trial or merely incidental and significant in hindsight?
My understanding (the textbook narrative) is that the trail dealt more with questions of traditional faith versus modern science and the policies derived from either were never touched upon. Admittedly I have never read the full court room notes (which are quite long - https://profjoecain.net/scopes-monkey-trial-1925-complete-tr...). But I was unaware that Bryan brought issues with Eugenics into play. This seems like a pretty big revision of the standard narrative. I would really appreciate any excerpts from Bryan's case to this effect if you have them handy.
Some folks absolutely want their own private fiefdoms. I've got a "neighbor" right now that's archetypical. In less than a year of moving in he's already made ham-handed attempts to scam me out of control of my right of way, been an apocalyptic pain in the ass to the young couple that just cleared a couple acres and built a house next to his property, and made several attempts to discuss creating an HOA on our road. Then there are folks like me that are exhausted by having to navigate other people's agendas and just want to be left the fuck alone. Anyway, you're spot on. All of the pearl clutching about liability is just the socially acceptable excuse folks offer for their behavior.
Validate Polars Data with Pandera
> even Johansson's family and friends couldn't tell it apart are somewhat telling.

You can listen to the voices side by side:

https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1cwy6wz/comment/l4...

And here is voice of another actress ( Rashida Jones ):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=385414AVZcA

This test is not blind but YOU tell me which you think is similar to the openAI sky voice? And what does that tell you about likely court result for Johansson? And having reached this conclusion yourself would you now think the other actress Rashida Jones is entitled to compensation based on this similarly test? Because there are no other women with similar voices? What might support from friends and family of Rashida Jones be an indication of?
And yet his concerns predate Hinton and Bengio coming around to them…
That's seriously awesome!
Crank that up high enough to even hope to make a dent and what you get is https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/31/france-drops-7...

Don't fight battles you know aren't going to win and don't enact laws you know are going to backfire.
Infrastructure from Code FAQ
Ukraine is still holding its own despite Russia's hypersonic missile prowess.

If you are talking about a blockade, as we've seen from Russia's invasion, Russia's world's second best navy is already powerless against Ukraine's drone attacks and missiles. And US has already warned China on a potential blockade as being very high cost.
You might enjoy this article (https://aisafety.dance/)

the section: "No, AI Safety isn't a fringe concern by sci-fi weebs"

> AI Safety / AI Risk used to be less mainstream, but now in 2024, the US & UK governments now have AI Safety-specific departments![10]10 This resulted from many of the top AI researchers raising alarm bells about it. These folks include:
> Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio
> Stuart Russell and Peter Norvig
> Paul Christiano

> I'm aware "look at these experts" is an appeal to authority, but this is only to counter the idea of, "eh, only sci-fi weebs fear AI Risk". But in the end, appeal to authority/weebs isn't enough; you have to actually understand the dang thing. (Which you are doing, by reading this! So thank you.)
*People realizing who Sam Altman really is after he does the same things he's always done
> There's a lot of funky syntax and features available but you do not have to use any of them.

The problem is that it's difficult to know which features you should use and which you shouldn't. And good luck enforcing your desired style if you're working with other developers (it's possible, but painful).

Perl is a highly complicated language with many sharp edges that catch out even experienced Perl devs.

The Perl ecosystem is also completely dead: modules languish with no updates, there is no decent tooling to speak of.

Of course, this new language also has no ecosystem. But maybe one day it will. Let's not stamp out its flame for no reason.
Keep in mind that 'right to roam' applies to unimproved and (some) agricultural land, and roamers can't disturb the right of enjoyment of the owner. This isn't your normal urban backyard.

Its more like someone walked through the parking spot that you paid to park in on their way to somewhere else.
Excellent point, I had not thought of that.
Note that when Bill Gates praises GPT-4o, he is at least partially "talking his book": he retains large amounts of equity in Microsoft, and has been intimately involved in MS's big bet on OA - in 2019, when Kevin Scott was lobbying a big investment in OA (https://gwern.net/doc/reinforcement-learning/openai/2019-sco...), Bill Gates was CCed, Gates invested in Inflection (recently rolled up into MS), and Sam Altman & Greg Brockman personally demoed GPT-4 to Gates at his mansion (https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/03/technology/ai-openai-musk...) to show that GPT-4 could solve the AP Biology test that Gates had said would convince him LLMs were real. And I'm sure his involvement now goes well beyond just those few instances I've happened to note.
Even when making my own string it still sounds good. I didn't known I'm that gifted!
> This was not in US.

If it was, I’d have just let them get away, and called the cops anyway.

They would be charged with leaving the scene of an accident (hit and run). The campus rent-a-cops would not be able to do a thing.
I think the reason it wasn't talked about before is because React used to be better / have less unnecessary complexity than it does today. The front-end pain has grown by an order of magnitude since.

I don't think HTMX addresses the fundamental problem of organizing (HTML) code into components, and/or the full-page-render / partial split. There is code duplication to ensure that every URL can render both fully server-side and update correctly client-side when e.g. hx-push-url happens (which most well built SPAs were able to do even before SSR, albiet somewhat slowly and poorly)

edit: Another problem that most front end frameworks seems to have stopped focusing on is building actual applications, i.e. things you would approach with https://localfirstweb.dev/ tools. HTMX can't help there at all.
Tool augmented LLMs will reach wild levels of unhuman synthetic intelligence though.
They are all chords (C, F, G, Am).

C/Am, F, G are adjacent in the circle of fifths so they will all play nice in a progression.
Of course. These laws don't just come out of nowhere. Kids drowning in pools is a real thing.
Impulse is constant, its the force that is transferred to your body. This is constant whether or not a belt is worn.

A belt simply takes that force and redistributes it into the seat frame, if the belt is not worn the force is not redistributed by the belt but rather by your head into the overhead bin
NO certificate or authority, I'm a nobody.

Take LinkedIn as example, and the messages from recruiters inviting for an interview. Why can't they get the profile checked by hiring managers and send out an offer directly? Once the candidate accepts it, collect the documents and run background checks and deny if there is discrepancy.
Without a right to roam, we end up with cases of public lands that lack any legal public access. I just read this article in the LA Times about a state park in California that there's no legal access to: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-05-20/the-stat...

But that's certainly not the only such case:
https://www.trcp.org/unlocking-public-lands/
In addition to being unaware of case law related to lookalikes/soundalikes (midler, waits), AI bros are showing themselves having ear deafness (like face blindness) claiming to hear no similarities to scarjo.
Note the or on my comment.
Where to get basic Startup guidance?
I'm the Co-founder of an AI/FinTech startup.
All is well, going 4 months strong.
But...

Where can I go to get basic questions answered?
From someone impartial, and trustworthy?

Like... For questions on financing...
do i need financing?
Should i get it?
Can I get it?
How much would I expect to get?
How much would I expect to offer?
I'd like to ask someone and get a genuine opinion.

And what about like... health insurance? lol
Like... I've got this tingly in my arm lol.
I'm thinking... "It'd be nice to have health/dental insurance rn"
In the pre-seed phase, is financing just like...
The founders trade equity for these benefits basically?
So that they can keep working, but with basic benefits?

Like... rn, we dont NEED more ppl.
We just need time.
And... it'd be nice to like... have basics covered without using some of the more time-consuming guerilla warfare tactics.

And like... how far is one Engineer expected to be able to go?
Like... at what point is there a genuine demand for more engineers?
And... how do we know how well I'm performing? (I'm the "CTO" :) )
Like... at what point is there a genuine demand for more labor, vs im just inadequate?
Like... is it expected that I build a full Consumer facing SaaS app, accepting payments, marketable, nice enough that you'd show random non-founder ppl?
In what timeframe?
Like... how "M" should the "MVP" be?

But yeah, i keep having a lot of questions like that.
idk who to turn to.

I fear that talking to non-startup ppl will yield bad advice.
And honestly, it usually gives off answers of pessimism and doubt, and a "dreams dont come true" mentality.

Idk (m)any VC's sadly

Yeah... like... idk wtf im doing basically lol.
Where can i go to for help?
(basically... is there a place LIKE YC's office hours?? but that doesnt cost equity or have that 1% admission barrier?)

(also for context, we dont want to get financing unless we need it. we prefer to bootstrap. we genuinely believe we can get pretty far without financing and potentially bootstrap. but... again, idk how realistic this is either)
Aren't there large areas of the anglophone world where "motor" = electric motor and "engine" = something that burns fuel to turn?
Don't tell Nina Rolle...
It’s about social media.