skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You probably also want to check the project from the same author that has more control sliders and code in human readable format instead of compiled wasm.

Demo : https://kotsoft.github.io/particle_based_viscoelastic_fluid/

Code : https://github.com/kotsoft/particle_based_viscoelastic_fluid...

Video :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OxC4oqy74U

edit : you probably also want to check one of the mentioned link : https://matthias-research.github.io/pages/tenMinutePhysics/i...
I seem to recall the past paid upgrades being timed to release with new macOS versions, but this one comes out ahead of WWDC in June, where presumably a new version will be unveiled. Is this related to the network filter extensions, so there's no longer the same risk of OS version incompatibilities?

An issue that's not unique to this developer, is that I'm having trouble determining what their update policy will be regarding the now previous version. Based on their past procedure, I'm not expecting it'll work with the next major macOS version, but it would be wonderful with clearer expectations on what types of bugs or security issues (if any) they commit themselves to fixing after the new version is out.
Fair enough. But unsafe for kernel code I guess it's a necessary evil (that's why I didn't mention it).

However, I believe the being "opt-in" by explicitly marking sections unsafe is the way to go instead of having unsafe by default (which is the only way using C).
Shout-out also for this smaller project: https://github.com/raphamorim/rio
I really like Common Lisp! Unfortunately, I can’t really find a use case for it. I usually develop web services and there Elixir and Erlang are winners in my book. For command line tools I use Rust or C. Can someone recommend types of applications where Common Lisp shines? I guess one can always write the business logic in CL and expose it via Unix socket.
I don't mind the info boxes,... I get mad at google when I input two words into the search field, press enter, and the first few results don't include one of the words (50% of the search! .. even include the "show only links which include..."), and then uses synonym results for the second word, which gives out totally wrong results.
thats one ugly site
Ah! The .plan file that finger(1) used reinvented for the Web world.
The reality is that in disabling WebGL, you have an incredibly unusual configuration and the author didn’t test for it. Stop making this a philosophical argument.
Why does the documentation need WebGL? It doesn’t, but the web has moved beyond just addressing “needs”. Why do you need to be on HN? You don’t. Yet here you are. I’m not arguing that the juice is worth the squeeze here, but your argument has a false premise that you’re exploiting to make the situation sound more absurd than it is.
The red lights off the crossing are very clear, even in the fog.

In any case, one should never drive so fast they can't stop within the visible distance.
Why would you want ligatures? I would prefer to see text as it actually is, not combining multiple characters into one. I can't trust what I am seeing if I know the text might be something it is not.
Also a note about it being Free as in Beer.
It also very much depends on the quality of your documents. E.g. if you have a set of very good recipes, rather than a random set coming for the Internet, then you can get very good answers with RAG
Actually I have good-ish memories of the early `boost` (we're talking 2003 - 2006) and some of the `std::` libraries in C++. They got the job done fine and were not in the way. So yeah, agreed.
Let me highlight some positive things about this:

Love the interesting density stratification and the little bubbles that move around. Very foamy or multi-fluid looking.

Not sure if it's intentional but the fact a click/touch only sort of locks the nearby particles is very satisfying. The fact I can slowly absorb particles into the click region, that the particles still engage in the slow, sticky motion and evolve inside the region and that I can then fling them off is bizarrely good.

Sure it could use a bit of optimisation and tweaking to make it move and look more like a fluid but I think this is a fantastic proof of concept of this particular method as an online, interactive example.
Not heard of WJB before. This article seems to be claiming that he's unfairly maligned as an anti-evolution activist and that he was campaigning against specific books that wrongly associate evolution with eugenics. The detail is pretty thin so I did a bit of reasearch myself. And I don't buy it. Wikipedia mentions a few quotes from the Scopes court case which clearly show that he disagreed with the very concept of evolution on Biblical grounds, e.g.:

> Bryan chastised evolution for teaching children that humans were but one of 35,000 types of mammals and bemoaned the notion that human beings were descended "Not even from American monkeys, but from old world monkeys"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scopes_trial#Proceedings

> Bryan opposed Darwin's theory of evolution through natural selection for two reasons. He believed what he considered a materialistic account of the descent of man (and all life) through evolution to be directly contrary to the Biblical creation account. Also, he considered Darwinism as applied to society (social Darwinism) to be a great evil force in the world by promoting hatred and conflicts and inhibiting upward social and economic mobility of the poor and oppressed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Jennings_Bryan#Anti-ev...
With stacktraces the size of a bible program execution actually slows down if my terminal isn't outputting it fast enough
Not sure if I missed it in the vid but the "duck" name (before it got corrupted) comes from the fabric part.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cotton_duck
Trigkey G4 mini-PC: Intel N100,16 GB RAM and 500 GB SSD all for less than US$200
With data quality standards, research ethics, and random audits.

https://mchankins.wordpress.com/2013/04/21/still-not-signifi...

The primary issue is circular references in citation, and non-cascaded retractions for known errata.

Typically thesis work tends to be reproducible most of the time, but around 12% to 17% of the hundreds of papers I read every month were nongeneralizable or worse outright BS.

It can be really disillusioning for many students...

Now I eat cheese goldfish crackers, and no longer care either way. Have a wonderful day =3
They absolutely should be paying you if they're single-handedly abusing your resources
Well you can make OCaml and Rust look like dynamic typing as well by omitting type signatures and squeezing the type inference engine as much as you can but I was under the impression that you have more asked about something that is very relaxed in terms of upfront requirements and be able to tighten it up later?

That's why I claimed that no such language exists.
Ask HN: How do I distribute phi-3 mini packaged with an app
So that the user doesn't have to download anything else - it's packaged with the app itself. And the app uses it to run inference. Is this possible?
> but the most motivated techies and criminals

I don't think you need to be "the most motivated techie/criminal" to install an app. If you go on an illegal forum to access illegal content, most likely you are ready to install such an app. Meaning that "this law targets child pornography" makes no sense.

But again, I think we all agree here. You just seem to keep repeating that legislation like this is dangerous (but we already all agree)!
Or rather, have a reputable source write an article about your work. If you write the news article about your own work and they publish it, the article is still a primary source (despite not being self-published)!
Also a (not south park) movie! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Down_and_Derby
Neither the website, nor the github page show you what this actually does.

> Manage timelines, allocate resources, and monitor deliverables for your projects.

Yes but how? Some screenshots or a video might help. Even some more detailed text.

I'm not going to compile every random project just to see a "quick" overview of how it actually works.
Google Blog: 3 new Google Pay features to help you easily check out online
It is worth noting that what is doable/practical with entry level CAD has increased a lot over the last 20 years. Hobbyists will not feel restricted, and one can do quite a lot of commercial relevant work also.
May HR personnel live in interesting times.
And thirdly: would anyone complain if children were spending 5 hours and 45 minutes a day reading books?

Watching television was much more toxic than digital media. Network television spoon fed content targeted at a lowest common denominator to everyone, that content was consumed passively. It was horrible.

Digital media allows active selection of content, and provides access to much higher quality information, if you want it.

Back in the day, you were lucky if your public library had even one book on a subject you were interested in, and if it did, it was probably mediocre at best. And highschool libaries? Pfft. Brittanica? Pathetic compared to Wikipedia.

Today, kids have instant access to all of human knowledge as digital media.

It's a false equivalency to compare TV time to digital media time.
Some of the HN discussion about whether "new projects in C should be allowed" is moot: Fluent Bit was imported into git in 2015 [0] (a few months before Rust's first public release), and may be considerably older than that for all I know.

I suppose incidents like this actually do give a reason to "rewrite it in Rust", when "it" is "widely deployed infrastructure written in C". OTOH, I'm sure there were plenty of non-memory-safety bugs introduced and later fixed over the years, and rewriting in Rust will recapitulate that subset of bugs.

[0] https://github.com/fluent/fluent-bit/commit/49269c5ec3c74411...
unfortunately, it's not really behind us.
It compares pretty well: it has all the essential features, and some more. It only lacks a couple keybindings in my eyes (shortcut to call the function at point in the REPL, shortcut to "change-package" from a lisp file). It has:

- the interactive debugger

- the Lisp REPL

- so we can have a full-featured Lisp REPL on the terminal with: alias ilem='lem --eval "(lem-lisp-mode:start-lisp-repl t)"'

- the same compilation, evaluation, code navigation keybindings and error reporting

some more:

- when we evaluate an expression, it will show a loading spinner during that time and then the result in an overlay.

- a "watch" command that shows results in the overlay too https://lem-project.github.io/usage/common_lisp/#watch

Overall, Lem has:

- a built-in LSP client that is known to work with other languages (and syntax highlighting for many languages)

- some tools, still more rudimentary than Emacs: directory mode, find file in project, project tree side view, Git tool (shows status, does interactive rebase)…

- it is in the process of having co-editing in Lem itself. The developer(s) are beta-testing a collaborative web-based version of Lem: https://github.com/sponsors/cxxxr

Lem has ncurses and SDL2 interfaces.

https://lem-project.github.io/usage/usage/
Perhaps a new entry in the web's most horrible standard: /.well-known/now ?
Unfortunately, "Trust me bro, they care" isn't good enough.

Database corruption can't explain how the photos can return to an iPad after wiping, if the encryption key has been changed as their documentation claims.

Unless the photos are actually linked to the device and not the actual account, which would be stupid and not how they described it works... or if it isn't encrypted at all - also not how it was marketed/described to work.

A pathetic one-line non-explanation for such a giant bug, that doesn't even align with the facts of what actually happened, is not congruent with the actions you'd expect from a company that cares about privacy.

They need to make a statement explaining how that could happen, and what they've done to prevent it happening again.
This is really cool and creative! Honestly one of my favourite AI things I've seen recently. More like this please :)
You forgot the part where you have to add your API key first
I am in the same exact situation.
Look, I don't live in the US and not obsessed with political wars there.

Your comments accusing me of working hard to prove something about Epstein just make no sense to me. You found the last person on the internet worth talking about this person on a tech forum.
Realistically, this is an announcement that Windows 12 will have a double click gguf runner and requisite backend as a feature.
It's especially strange, given the amount of effort the blog author went to, to add Google apps back to their de-googled phone.

Having started on this path, in my opinion it's a losing battle and a waste of time. Google have thousands of engineers just waiting to patch whatever hack you are using in your "de-googled" phone. Android serves the purposes of its creator.
The point being is that plagiarism at a known private school that you pay good money for and hope to rely on, is something you will give much more consideration than sending work to a science fair to see if it will stick to a wall or not.

Neither are particularly good behaviors, but as a "computer guy" I think your public-facing API (science fair admissions) should validate its inputs. There are people out there who send know malicious requests to endpoints, you know.

Instead of blaming an underage student I'd reevaluate all of their prior nominations. Chances of dragons being there.
I couldn't finish it. The writing wasn't great and that made me very sad.
You mean like it could be that launch costs will become so low the differential will not matter any more?
I'm not super familiar with Zig, but that appears to be the same as the rust function signature
fn setData<P, B>(pins: P, bus: B, data: u8) -> B;

in rust, the P and B are resolved at compile time, not at runtime. If you wanted dynamic dispatch the types would be Box<dyn B>
'WebGL disabled' is a pretty strong fingerprint anyways
Scrolling Alone: Smartphones and Social Atomization
Hm, I think we're talking different scenarios. I was under the impression that the new person is sorely needed and not having them on board would lead to lost revenue.
To be fair to the Guardian, the study has only just come out, and is (apparently) using the most recent data available.

But yes, it's interesting that they're taking 7 year old data to present an anti-EV narrative without mentioning that rather important caveat.
Go is absolutely opinionated about unused variables, and its opinion is "that's a compiler error." It's part of what makes Go special. You should try writing some sometime.
It was not about GWT at all. That was exactly my point: passing on a senior just because they don't know $specific_tech that can be learned in 2 weeks is a short-sighted business decision.
It's now 4 1/2 years since Starliner's nearly-disastrous first (uncrewed) test flight, 4 years since SpaceX's successful crewed test flight, and 2 years since Starliner's second (uncrewed) test flight.

At what point does NASA need to pull the plug on Starliner, and start looking for second-source Earth-LEO passenger service from companies which can actually do the d*mned job?
Utilising GenAI within ADO to create requirements for User Stories
There is another way to disable this and other annoyances with a lot less effort... Just check https://duckduckgo.com for more information.
You certainly should. Even if you know some bash and zero python I suppose, because bash is just so "special".

But only if your target environment has python, and that's not a given, not a zero-cost change, in this age of short-lived containers. The use case for a "compile to bash" language would be compile in a dev-operated environment and commit both source and output, which would then run on later stages in the CI/CD pipeline that might very well not have python. And those stages will absolutely not have your "compile to bash" tool, which would ideally be included along with the source unless it's somehow as near-omnipresent as python. This one appears to be implemented in rust, I'd certainly feel more optimistic about depending on it as a script authoring tool if it was e.g. a python script that could be included with my "pre-bash" source, and/or packaged in, say, npm.
Stack Overflow Users Are Revolting Against an OpenAI Deal
> if however it is forbidden everywhere else it would create an unfair advantage.

Nobody is talking about forbidding anything, and you can't be serious when arguing that living in a seismic area would be an unfair advantage, I mean for real?

> Also I immagine that unnecessary use of reinforced concrete makes up well under 1% of its global use

That's the problem I think, you are giving way to much credit to your imagination.
You're not obligated to listen to an ad anymore than you are obligated to buy an advertised product.

Creators will still get paid per download with this tool. If everyone does something like this (unlikely), worst case is conversion rates might be lower, which could cause advertising to become less financially viable, so content creators may have to explore other monetization options or add more advertising.

Removing ads from a podcast that offers a paid ad-free alternative feels wrong, but aside from that I don't see anything wrong with this. I'll always choose a paid version over ads.

Video/audio ads (especially TV commercial breaks) seem inherently obtrusive to me. They're hard to skip, and rarely contextual. I personally think listening to ads is generally harmful, there are better sources of information to be influenced by to make a decision.

An unobtrusive ad would imo be more like putting a link in the description, or a privacy-respecting banner on the website. I'm sure that wouldn't pay as well, though.
iTerm2: cmd+shift+a = select output of last command. I can then cmd+c, open whatever editor I want (or `pbpaste | less` if I want `less`).
> I have no idea what the EU is proposing

Well the article is about efforts aiming at weakening encryption, and my comment is about that.

> is true, it's also moot.

Anything is moot if you completely ignore the context. The article talks about policy makers who want to alter encryption in such a way that they get more control over it. My point is that they need to understand that they cannot get this kind of control the way they advertise it (with "privacy-preserving sniffers").

Of course you can say that anyway the NSA can hack you, but that's off-topic here. My point is that politicians need to understand the basics of how encryption works, such that they can think properly about propositions like that.

Even for politicians, there is a big difference between "privacy-preserving sniffing" and "adding a spyware in every device". The former is impossible, the latter is possible. But many politicians wouldn't vote for the latter.
I think the author is over generalising things. Every tech is good for few things and not good for others.

Vector Search, LLMs all are revolutionary technologies and have their own limitations but we should not form a bias on the basis of few edge cases.
>> genocide in Ukraine

> I would be very interested what your daily news sources are.

Putin is literally wanted by the International Criminal Court for forcible transfer of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian children, which is a crime of genocide that he foolishly boasted about in public without understanding its full ramifications.
Yes, I am looking forward to more userChrome.css changes to un-streamline the damn URL bar back above the tabs once again, as well as to undo whatever other obnoxious UI changes they decide to inflict on us. It's become a regular ritual, performed with much cursing and gnashing of teeth.
Seems horrendously brittle. I'd trust badly written bash over this.
RSS Is Awesome
Why stop there, the site cost $0/year back in 1999.
> Automation outperforms astronauts for (say) Hubble Telescope Repair?

The last hubble repair mission was in 2009. Robotics have come a long way since then. And the Hubble was still pretty close to earth. I can guarantee you that no human hand will ever touch the James Webb telescope ever again. If things go wrong at the 2nd lagrange point, its either robots-to-the-rescue, or bye-bye-telescope.

Comparing a short, limited scope mission, close to earth, to the challenges of doing space things on other planets, is a bit far fetched.

> Your assertion only makes sense if the set of activities we do in space is sharply circumscribed

They are. They have to be, because activities that are not sharply circumscribed, have a very high probability to kill people in space.

> It's a mindset that comes from the "space is extremely expensive" environment

No, it's a mindset that comes from the "space is extremely deadly, and humans are surprisingly fragile outside of the habitat they evolved in" environment.
Teslas "virtual power plant" is only for Tesla Powerwall. There's no V2G capabilities in any Teslas to date, and I don't think there's even hardware support for it. The Tesla Cybertruck has V2L capability, so it might have the necessary hardware to do V2G with some software updates, but I kinda doubt it.

The Tesla "virtual power plant" does reserve some capacity for you, and technically you can charge your car with that. A single Tesla Powerwall is "only" 10kWh, and with inverter losses and such you're likely seeing closer to 8kWh of usable energy if you charge your car with it. You're probably much better off just using it to run your appliances so you mitigate some of the losses with more inverters in the mix.
Too many people don't know about Wikidata.
CHIP-8 test suite
Is this a blog for people who want to blog, but don't want to call it a blog?
> Which is why we have international laws, in which smart people sat down and codified how this all works.

And yet it is ignored in every war. It’s almost as though encouraging killing people leads to problems.
kitty is written in Python, which instantly lowers the ceiling for performance by an order of magnitude. I discarded it as an option in the past: the most important requirement for me is the terminal cannot crash, and I can't trust a Python program to do that.
It has all the features you need, but due to a lack of manpower, it's really lacking polish compared to Solidworks. "Free for personal use" Commercial CAD is probably better if you're learning. Once somewhat proficient, you could consider switching to FreeCAD.
Ah, violating copyright is not a crime, I see.
Spoken like a housecat who thinks it’s a Tiger.
It also seems to be comparable to gpt 3.5 turbo which I feel hard to believe. People have obviously found out a way around these benchmarks.
Could be! Adam Tooze's book about the Nazi regime's finances was a good read and there were details about this, but I might have misremembered (https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/711592.The_Wages_of_Dest...).
Compilation of a large project on a multiple cores can be slowed down by a terminal. Especially if the main language of the project is a fast compiling C. I'm not sure that urxvt can be a bottleneck, and if it can you'll not be able to notice the difference with alacritty without measurements, but with others it can be noticeable without any special equipment.
Microsoft will just use their fancy new regional-based settings framework and start piecemealing features off in countries that start to complain while leaving it for the rest of the world to suffer with.

That’s how they’ve handled the EEA so far and they’ll just keep mashing things the same.