skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's because this is actually ClojureScript (JS under the hood) running as a browser library.

If you try that in Clojure, you'll get:

> ClassCastException class clojure.lang.PersistentList cannot be cast to class java.lang.Number

If you try it in a "proper" ClojureScript dev environment (shadow-cljs), you get nil as a result with this warning:

> cljs.core/+, all arguments must be numbers, got [number cljs.core/IList] instead
We have irrefutable evidence that Elon was the top executive at companies that did all those things, while you have no evidence that those things would have happened without him.
Wealthy people have enough sway to get the laws written they want. It's nothing new. Our politicians are legally bought and paid servants.

Ppl repeat this like a truism. Hundreds of millions of dollars of donations by a certain crypto exchange CEO did nothing to keep him from seeing a 25 year sentence.
Linting code for LLMs with Tree-sitter
Aider now lints your code after every LLM edit, and offers to automatically fix any errors. It uses tree-sitter to both lint the code and send any errors to the LLM in a novel format that includes code context.
Unless they have a way to roll the ADS-B info, it should be pretty easy to work all this out.

Hard to imagine this will actually make jet tracking sites/accounts/etc disappear.
There is no spacecraft related reason to use this unless what you want is for your spacecraft to actually fly on schedule. Risk assessment from supply chain issues is part of engineering.
That jet fuel wasn't going to stay in the ground or anything if these people don't fly. Sure - they contribute to to burning it up slightly faster than if there were no private planes, but rest assured people are going to burn everything that burns, until there are no more people.
It isnt that simple. There is 250 years of case law defining what constitutes public use, and the situations where it can be justified. This includes when you can use it to build a road or trail, and when you cant.
Sounds like something any programmer would say about their preferred language. Can't say you don't hear similarly crazy things about C, or C++, or Java.
> It's their job to protect the child, but often they do the opposite, and it's worth asking why.

It seems pretty simple to me why. If we were talking about a job in tech, there would be 10,000 snarky responses about how it was obvious that this project manager or that maintenance developer was just protecting their job. Same here. Rocking the boat as a guidance counselor or anything like that just invites complaints (warranted or not), and in those roles they're judged by the school administrators on how many (or few) complaints are received. Same as teachers, I think. And though I've read no stories from school psychologists, teachers who get even a few complaints find themselves unwelcome in that district.

Maybe my speculation is wrong in this regard, but if so, I can't see the flaw in it.
In Perl you have the dynamism, and the syntax.

Evidently, 93% paint splatters, when OCRed, are valid Perl programs:

https://www.mcmillen.dev/sigbovik/2019.pdf

I doubt that a similar thing is true for Clojure.

Here, the only problem is that you don't know what the symbols and some of the notations mean. You can look at the unfamiliar syntax and know what is a child of what. Most operators are words you can search for.
The Linux tool is called Intel powertop.

How do Activity Monitor and AlDente get detailed power data? They don't prompt me to elevate privileges.

tyvm for the docs links! I still don't have any specifics in mind for useful attacks one could carry out using the data mentioned in `man powermetrics`. I assume the worry is that this stuff could play a role in some kinds of side-channel attacks but idrk much about low-level OS stuff. :-\
Yes.I got a response from a few clients. They got enough emails and left to try it.
Discussion [0] (29 points, 2 days ago, 28 comments)

[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40421100
I edit a lot so I set the delay in my profile to give me 10 minutes to do so.
> or they don't even know what to ask because they are basically 4 grades behind in math

Then they start by asking "What is this" and just keep asking questions.

Teachers seriously underestimate how much damage they do to students ability to learn by sneering at questions that they think should be obvious.
>On the one hand we say that people who make more money should pay higher marginal tax rates, and set marginal rates on lower income people to low or zero rates. On the other hand we demand means testing at lower income rates, which is equivalent to a tax on marginal income.

Isn't this already the case? It's true that you need to means testing to get access to additional benefits, but the tax rate itself is already progressive even if you don't any means testing.
> many imperative languages have adopted parts of functional programming

nailed it. I don't know much about functional languages other than a haskell course back in the day, but I don't want to do functional all the time. It plays great in some situations and I am happy to use those language subsets in my daily coding, but I don't need my entire application to be written in an esoteric language
Sneaking in a comment.

Two circuits sharing a common ground path causes electronic noobs no end of confusing grief. Because the two circuits are coupled via the ground inductance and resistance.

And a circuit that forms with it's ground a large loop is another source of confusing grief. A big loop is an inductor. And will pickup magnetic energy passing through it.
If you are new to Clojure and would like to experiment with it in a way that is immediately useful, I highly recommend the Babashka runtime for scripting [0]. It's very fun, approachable, and one of the more polished parts of the Clojure ecosystem.

It's a particularly good entry point because unlike full-JVM Clojure it has a very fast startup time. Newcomers can use any file-watching /reloading tools (e.g. nodemon) that they're already familiar with to work with it interactively.

Hopefully, a enthusiastic user will graduate to using a REPL connection in their editor for a fully interactive setup. But newcomers tend not to do this... its an unfamiliar workflow to most, and can be pretty cumbersome to setup.

[0]: https://babashka.org
Regarding .NET:

• .NET installers install to systemwide locations and therefore typically require elevated privileges.

• Microsoft supplies both install scripts (dotnet-install) and .tar.gz/.zip archives to support unprivileged installation to arbitrary locations on all supported platforms.

• The SDK and self-contained .NET executables run from anywhere, but certain SDK functionality may require elevated privileges on some platforms (e.g., installing a trusted self-signed developer certificate).

• Framework-dependent executables use the DOTNET_ROOT environment variable to locate runtime components installed in a non-default location.
> It's based on income, and handled by the states, and the income limit climbs based on number of children.

SNAP also require asset limits, which is $2,750 per _household_. Given that rent for a large family may easily be in the ~$1,500-2,500 range, it leaves pretty much no money in the bank for any other expenses.
Ask HN: Something like Unicode but for abstract concepts?
Taking a recent HN post as example:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40440086

"Motor = something that puts into motion". "Engine = an ingenious, clever contraption". Related, but from an abstract point of view, referring to different concepts.

Question: like Unicode encodes characters, glyphs, emojis etc, does there exist something which does the same, but for abstract concepts?

With "abstract concept" I mean anything that is commonly described using words (using different words in different languages), or specific symbols in some written languages, sometimes a drawing, schematic, animation, a snippet of pseudo code, etc. That may have their own Wikipedia page. Or be at the heart of a scientific theory.

Both words & symbols may refer to abstract concepts. But there are many words that don't, many symbols that don't, many different words used to describe the same concept, or words that refer to different concepts (depending on context). In short: a word, symbol etc does not map 1:1 to an unambiguous, abstract concept.

I'd imagine if you'd want to squeeze the "collective knowledge of humanity" in the smallest possible space, or build a database of expert knowledge in some field(s), this would be useful. I can also imagine that for such databases (expert systems?) ad-hoc implementations of the above have been done (?). Or that such a generic encoding would have other uses.

But generalized, standardized, like Unicode? Anything similar / related, but not quite the same?

Btw: if no such thing exists, then it should be created.
Is someone tracking your CO2 emissions when you drive or travel by commercial jet? There's no database I'm aware of where I can search for your name and see all your vehicular movement.
The first 18 year old swifties are now 36.
You could look at West Bank and arrive at a conclusion that laying down arms did not end the occupation, not the colonisation. Neither the different rules for Palestininas and Israelis.
What? Anyone can make a basic car in a workshop with metalworking tools. Henry Ford made cars.
The only advanced chemicals you need are fuel to burn.
> The fact that the average US vehicle age continues to climb is an indicator that the durability of vehicles continues to climb. That's it.

Aside from collision damage I can keep any old car on the road -- newer cars, not so much.

Find an old car and figure out why they quit driving it plus whatever happened from it sitting around (seals going bad and whatnot) then drive it over to the DMV to get registration... the story of pretty much every car I drove in the '90s.
lots of ppl fly private. not just super-rich people. many flights are chartered
That has more to do with Javascript being weird than Clojurescript. That would almost certainly throw a good exception when using Clojure / Java.
> Knowledge work and trades couldn't be further from what public school prepares you for.

Amen!

K-12 in the US needs a massive overhaul, but there are (at least) two problems:

1. Deeply entrenched administrators.

2. Parents who put high value on the child care component of school (regardless of whether learning is happening), which became extremely obvious during Covid, and they don’t want to risk losing that.
No kidding! Musk adds more and better things to the economy than a pop entertainer, for sure. Young fans would disagree, but household earners with dependents would disagree.

How much does Tesla add, how much does SpaceX add? Twttr is in some ways in the same category (entertainment) as Swift, but it's also a good dissemination platform. Billions vs Millions, but whatever... truth is a cruel mistress.
The correct way to solve the market failure of externalities is taxation, not social shaming.
Meaning is not value, economically speaking. I don't think Musk creates much value if any, but can sympathize with their point.
Zawinski's Law:

> Every program attempts to expand until it can read mail. Those programs which cannot so expand are replaced by ones which can.

I think nowadays we can substitute email with chat/DM.
I suspect that your anecdata results from the community that organized religion engenders. Irrespective of all the criticisms leveled at religion, the simple fact of the matter is that if you feel like you belong, that your struggles are not unique, and that you can talk to people who have come through similar struggles apparently intact, you will likely heal from the experience faster and more completely. That the religion can provide some explanation for why you had to experience the trauma is a neat side effect.

The veteran suicide rate is an evergreen cause of concern, but one of the major stories amongst veterans is that they leave this community where they had a very clearly defined role, with very clearly defined acceptable modes of behavior, and when you leave, all of that is stripped away. The sudden absence of community and sense of purpose is, for many veterans, an unbridgeable gap.

There absolutely are insidious downsides to such tight-knit communities (especially in response to threats to the community - vis how often the victim of clerical sexual abuse encounters further attacks from members of the church). But e.g. religious organizations have persisted for so long because there's a sort of cost-benefit analysis occurring, where the community decides that so long as the community continues to function, its OK that a few members of the community are sacrificed to protect it.

To be clear, its not like PTSD is a new thing. Catatonia, combat fatigue, etc, are stress responses that have been recognized for centuries. Its just that only fairly recently we've concluded that hey, maybe writing people off when they hit that point is a bad thing, and maybe we should invest some time in helping people before they reach that state.
Let China export vehicles to the US tariff free and I bet we see the average age decline quite rapidly (i.e. lower prices driving new car adoption).

Agreed that this is largely a function of higher quality/longer lasting vehicles though
They are good ideas.

For my own projects, I do try to avoid scope creep. (In some cases I had thought something should be in scope but later changed my mind (before actually implementing it), though.) I did not add a file called VISION but maybe that would help, so I will consider that. I do want to keep communication public (mainly using NNTP, although IRC and GitHub issue trackers can also be used), but nevertheless there isn't any communication on there.

> If a potential contributor has a different opinion on what your project should do, you may want to gently encourage them to work on their own fork. Forking a project doesn’t have to be a bad thing. Being able to copy and modify projects is one of the best things about open source. Encouraging your community members to work on their own fork can provide the creative outlet they need, without conflicting with your project’s vision.

This is correct. However, it is also possible for some of the features of a forked version to later be put into the official version (or a different fork) (after being reviewed by the maintainer). This does happen sometimes, too.

> Users are far more likely to reach out when they have a complaint. If everything works great, they tend to stay silent. It can be discouraging to see a growing list of issues without the positive feedback showing how your contributions are making a difference.

Nevertheless, it make sense; there is more to say if they have a complaint (or a suggestion for improvement, or a question, etc) than if it works OK.

I don't mind this; my problem is that I rarely receive any feedback at all, regardless of good or bad.

(However, I think that it is helpful even for positive feedback to be specific. This way, it can also help other people to decide whether or not they think this program is suitable (or almost suitable) for their intended uses.)

(I have received stars on GitHub (for some projects), but they don't help me at all, since they do not say anything.)

> Working alone: Being a maintainer can be incredibly lonely. Even if you work with a group of maintainers, the past few years have been difficult for convening distributed teams in-person.

This is my problem; lack of other people discussion and contributions.
Mark it for a W for privacy.

A win for privacy should be celebrated even if the avg person wont (yet) benefit.
If someone steals my car, I hope it's never recovered so I can get the insurance payout. Who knows how the thief drove it (e.g. put it in neutral and floored it for 10 minutes) and what unseen damage lurks.
Prefix notation isn't unconventional and it has many benefits.

The main one being if you want to add many many items together it's much easier IE (+ 1 2 3 4 5 6).

Instead of doing an operation between two numbers you are apply a function to a list of inputs. In the "+" function's case you are adding them together. With this in mind, it's no different than most other programming languages. You would never have your function be in the middle of your arguments/inputs.

In python its Foo(bar, bar) and not bar Foo() bar, which obviously doesn't make sense.
People are moody, and will ignore the problems and keep pushing further investment / work harder / we need to hire now! or nobody can make money / why bother going to work / fire people or get bankrupt! for way longer than it makes sense.
P. Diddy getting jealous.
Andrej Karpathy has directly worked with him. Listen to what he says:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33703617
> Divorce is a massive cause of trauma and increasing in the west

Not true that it's increasing. It peaked in the 70s and has decreased since.

[1] https://www.bgsu.edu/ncfmr/resources/data/family-profiles/lo...
I feel for them, because even if they (and weirdos like us on this site) value decentralization and other related values the average customer just DOES NOT CARE. They're trying to compete with other platforms without this handicap and very people people are willing to give them any "credit" for it
Its no longer invite only.
There are a lot more people looking to camp in generally smaller areas especially on weekends. And the east doesn’t have the large networks of forest roads and almost roads and not really roads that you have in many western national forests and BLM land.

The West obviously has plenty of camping restrictions in popular areas like national parks and wilderness areas where you may have year in advance lotteries.

I’m not sure why the east would be uniquely hostile given the same agencies administer federal land across the whole country.

But, in general, yes if you want to get away from people and have more flexibility in where you can camp, you’re probably best off traveling to the western states.
There might be reasons to use `bc` like this if you don't know the type of `age` and it could be a non-numeric string. Buuuuut a programming language where a simple integer-comparison leads to two subprocesses is going to be slower than the slowest existing programming languages, by orders of magnitude.
As slow as Python is, though, Bash is more slow. Much more slow.
Thanks! As someone who hates reading metaprogrammed ruby code, I imagine since Lisp gives you even more power, trying to understand what's happening in code is even harder. I know some people enjoy writing this style of code, but I personally do not
So, this means refactoring becomes potentially difficult. While the gem is still a great accomplishment and very useful, I'd have to engineer my way around this issue before using it with things like a Rails Model which could have changing shape.

@OP:

I wonder if the README (and possibly runner) should suggest writing a test-case that doesn't rely on PBT when the user wants to preserve a case for future testing.

The issue here is that if you're saving a singular example and it represents a weird corner case, it's totally conceivable that a small change will result in an invisible change to that test case.

Another idea: it'd be great if the test could simply take examples that are failing and add them to a `failing_examples.rb` or some such. I know I'd use a feature like this quite a bit.
Sky sounded quite different to SJ. Them taking the voice off means they are accepting guilt it seems.
Tom Lehrer is one of my musical heroes, and I listen to his songs regularly to this day. My hat's off to you, Mr. Lehrer.

Having known a couple of very famous people and seeing what that brought to them, I'd prefer obscurity. I don't know if that's related to his decision-making, of course.
There is a growing number of cases where the salesperson will activate OnStar (or a non-GM equivalent) without asking or telling the buyer about it. As far as I know, there is no (legal) way to deactivate OnStar or similar GPS trackers built into cars. Of course if you're driving in a city the proliferation of ALPRs is so pervasive that your movements are being tracked in real-time even if you're driving a 1958 Ford F-series truck.
Religion and psychiatry hardly seem opposed to me. It's popular to see Buddhism as actually a kind of therapy, although certainly not 100% correct, and that's sort of what prayer is meant to do too.
Location: Chicago, IL, USA

Remote: Yes (U.S. Citizen)

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: HTML5, CSS3, Javascript (Node.js, Nest.js, TypeScript, React, jQuery), REST, CosmosDB, Milvus, UI/UX

Resume/CV: Available on request via email

Email: samk9080@gmail.com

I'm a full-stack developer with 10+ years of experience. I've done work for small startups to big tech firms like Microsoft. Most recently, I worked on a RAG based Gen AI application. I'm a passionate Software Engineer who believes in knowing the fundamentals of programming languages inside and out (mainly JavaScript) which allows you to pick up and learn any new framework/library. Lastly, I'm a strong team player looking to take on projects/tasks no matter how ambiguous and turn out exceptional user experiences!
It depends on whether you need these features, and this performance.

An M2 MBP may have best in class features and performance, but an RPi 3 may be sufficient for a particular computing task, even if it's way less advanced.
So the farmers does not want to give access to the land to the people.

Maybe the government should remind them how they got their land in the first place?
Yes, modifying buffer_size in audio_shader.js to 4096 completely fixes this issue on Windows (chrome).
Same question... ADS-B transponder surely remains on to prevent in flight collisions / maintain vertical sep.

Guessing FAA is just committing to anonymize their public part 135 operators list.
> I am saying this as a bitter outsider without a Bluesky account but with FOMO

You'll be pleased to learn that Bluesky sign-up has been open to all without invitation since last February.
I thought the entire point of Bluesky was that it was to be decentralized? Did that change?
I think when he uses the term he means a good simulation of what we would call consciousness -- so yes I agree. It can pay attention at many layers of abstraction and create from it.
None of this is even remotely surprising to me; DeepMind (specifically Demis) and Nature have had a long-running mutually beneficial relationship.

I guess the way I think about it is, the absolutely most competitive people in a field don't actually need the exact code and data from their competitors- they have enough smart people on staff to reproduce and sometimes even exceed the competitor. That's certainly true for David Baker (Rosetta). It slows the process down, meaning Baker's group might need to spend 3-6 months reading through the paper, reproducing the ideas, seeing what works, what important details were left out (nearly every great paper I've read leaves out some bit of the special sauce), and then releasing their own papers/codes/results.

It's worth seeing this with 200+ year old eyes, for example the competition between England and Germany to be the #1 science country, with massive benefits for not sharing the exact details of technology that was developed locally. One might even speculate that this sort of behavior does globally increase the overall rate of scientific progress by stimulating intense competition instead of complacency.