skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I have seen the word "defenestration" many times before, but I think that your comment is the first time ever that I see "fenestration" o_O
Any way do regional and or segment breakouts? The way I see your tool, it's a great tool for the back of the napkin-ers but as it is right now, it doesn't obviate modeling because you're still going to have to do the breakouts in excel.

Also, I think it'd be great to set your defaults assumptions for a stock to breakeven pricing, and allow users to adjust from there.

I see a tool like this being useful, but I think positioning it as a deep valuation tool is much less useful in the mindsphere of investors as an elite pen and napkin, which I think people would use.
My observation is that most criticism is useless, because people don't understand why you did things the way you did them.

If you explain why, they either still don't understand, or don't agree.

If the first iPhone had been presented on HN/Reddit/Twitter, everyone would criticize the lack of physical keyboard.
if I slaved away at openai for a year to get some equity, I don't think I would want to be the one to try this strategy
Btw the url i entered was https://anvil-editor.net/, not rendermotion
China's first large-scale sodium-ion battery charges to 90% in 12 minutes
The scale of two people should be large enough to make it ambiguous who spilled the beans at least
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4842-9606-6

First time author here, made quite mistakes both in the book and the process of writing it, and my biggest mistake is choosing the incompetent publisher.

I’m not looking to make money from writing books, my original plan was to write another tech book about LLM after the first one, however after my experience with the first book, I’ll probably never write another book!
SHOW HN:Uber but for people who struggle in finding and validating product ideas
Just like you, I’ve always struggled to find new Saas ideas and validate them. It never gets easier unless you’ve a big user base of your own (even then it’s difficult - tbh). So, after my last launch, not able to find any new ideas I got frustrated, and at that moment something struck my mind,

“Why not create a marketplace where people having problems with their current saas can come and post their problems there, then other people with the same problem can vote on it. After that, a developer can come and build a solution for it…”

After this thought some more thoughts came with some good features ideas for that marketplace. The one which I liked the most was,

“The person who will post the problem and others who will upvote it will have to give their emails. Once the developer builds the solution he/she can send emails to those people and easily get first customers (customers who really need the solution).“

Just like that, Probs was born! A marketplace which connects Problem Owners and Solution Builders, and solves the biggest problem of finding new ideas and validating them. And, you guys can actually post your own ideas there for validation, and can also bring your own user base there for voting.

Want to be the first ones to try the marketplace? Join the waitlist now!
> https://theprobs.onepage.me/
> Attribution is required for all users. It is as simple as putting “Data provided by Financial Modeling Prep” somewhere on your site or app and linking that text to https://financialmodelingprep.com/developer/docs/.

I don't see attribution on useequityval.com?
The style is called Blackletter or Gothic script. It was very common (maybe the most common) in Europe for several hundred years. When I was little, it had pretty much disappeared in the UK, and I only discovered it as a curiosity in a handful of books in my mum's old book collection. Apparently, when she was at school they were still taught to read it as part of learning German as most of the German texts they were given used it.
I find constructing with sand hard to accept as beautiful.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2713680/
Most AI companies are not building AGI. LLM already has tons of profitable utilities.
I think the main problem I’ve noticed with these initiatives is that lack actually discussion in some organizations and just used “virtual” training videos. If it’s actually going to work then you need top level managers having discussions.
thats why microsoft want to build supercomputer to do it, You know that microsoft is backing Open AI right.

They dont want lose to Apple,Google and Meta
I have a friend who takes this; it's very expensive and insurance doesn't want to pay for it, but if you convince them that you're high enough risk ("oh, I just keep finding myself in strangers' beds, I love getting people's blood on me, and I'm just too dumb to remember to take a pill every day"), you can get it.

Normal PrEP actually puts you at greater risk if you forget to take it, so I'm really glad that the injectable one is an option. It's much more effective, too. I should see about trying to get on it soon...
No, Wine is not a container. The Windows application is free to make any Linux syscall with the privileges of the user running Wine. You shouldn't run an untrusted application in Wine any more than you would do for regular Linux applications.
This might not be what you want to hear (and I might get downvoted for it), but it’s what I consider the best answer: Implement something minimal but useful (and realistic) using both methods and benchmark them yourself.

Even if I told you some of the numbers I’ve seen in my experiments and usage, it wouldn’t be wise to trust them or let them taint your opinion.
No, it's well within the fair use exemption.
clever, but I don't think it's true. Otherwise people when they get drunk wouldn't start to get argumentative and dissatisfied with life.

Perhaps it's more a normal distribution, at the beginning with a light buzz the ways of God seem to be more OK, at its height in the middle everything God ever did is GREAT, and then the fall and the eventual conclusion that everything is unjust and then vomiting.
It may not make a lot of sense but it follows the "fair use" doctrine. Which is generally based on the following 4 factors:

1) the purpose and character of use.

2) the nature of the copyrighted material.

3) the *amount* and *substantiality* of the portion taken, and.

4) the effect of the use upon the *potential market*.

So in that regard, if you're training a personal assistance GPT, and use some software code to teach your model logic, that is easy to defend as fair use.

But the extent of use matters, and if you're training an AI for the sole purpose of regurgitating specific copyrighted material, it is infringement, if it is copyrighted, but in this case, it is not copyright issue, it is contracts and NDAs.
Start menu in Windows 11 uses React Native
https://archive.ph/z2tjV
Identity in physics can be challenging to find. We’re given a narrow set of labels to choose from, typically theorist or experimentalist, and these can often be time-dependent as we progress in our careers. Throughout my time in the discipline, I’ve worked in experimental labs, theory groups, and more applied settings. Many times I’ve branded myself a theorist, perhaps more out of desire than measure; however, I’ve always wanted a more nuanced way of describing my work, myself, and developmental stage. Short answer: like most things we do, it depends on a clever choice of coordinates.
Three different classification systems (two 2D and one 1D) gathered from leading theorists, compiled. Measures features like preference for mathematical or intuitive tools, goals of analyzing existing models or constructing new ones, reliance on rigor, sophistication of computational tools, etc.
See full post for more, including XKCD-style visuals (because why not):
Easier said than done, I have seen a lot since 1980's.
Unfortunately, ComputeSharp is Windows-only which significantly limits its usability.
Yes, but when looking at the source it's more obvious this is a repeating pattern.

"Hey, I'm accessing the 0th element here, just want to make that clear"

Without the +0, that statement looks disconnected from the +1 even though conceptually its the same.

Say somebody adds some special marker/tombstone/whatever into element 0 and now all those additions need to be bumped up by one. Someone else may go and see the +1, +2, +3 and just change them to +2, +3 +4, etc while completely missing the lone variable by itself as its visually dissimilar.

Ive usually seen it used in longer lists of statements. It also keeps everything lined up formatting wise.
Foam as a concrete mold? I don’t think it’s going to keep it shape and even if it did the surface and details are going to be terrible.
The only non biased answer that you will probably get, as I have used all 3 extensively. I run windows on my desktop, linux on my laptop, and use a Mac for work.

Ill group Windows and Linux into one for hardware since you will likely buy a windows laptop and install linux on it. Hardware wise, generally, battery life for use is worse compared to Mac. Generally, you can get ones that last like 10 hours with light use, so its not too much of an issue, but if you are frequently without a place to charge, you will find Macs much longer lasting. Also, depending on the laptop you get, you can get subpar touchpads and displays, but generally at $600 or above, these aren't an issue.

Mac wise, the hardware problems are way more present. No way to change out SSD, no way to upgrade ram, no way to replace battery, and you have hardware locks on the software you can run. You also don't get a choice for an actual graphics card, which is a much better choice if you want to do mobile ML, as Apple ANE is pretty much reserved for their own software.

Software wise, Windows 11 is pretty good these days, but you have to do some leg work. You need to get the pro version, sign on originally with a microsoft account, then turn on local login, and then disable a bunch of shit. There are github scripts for this, https://github.com/topics/windows-11-debloat is a good start. Its definitely a more resource heavy OS compared to Mac or Linux, but its the only one that can run ALL software, since WSL2 is pretty much native Linux and works extremely well, even for ML with talking to the graphics cards as well as graphical linux apps since Windows has an X server (although first start is slow).

Linux wise, this is hard to quantify because depending on the laptop and distro, you can have different mileage. Generally, Linux Mint is super safe and will work with everything - the only tweaks you may have to do is hardware features (like fn+f keys for things like backlight). Manjaro is also very good these days.

MacOS is also fairly good for general use with features, but it gets in your way quite a bit with permissions, and tries really hard to force you to use Apple products. Also with Apple Silicon, Rosetta performance still varies quite a bit between software that is not native.

In general, if you want the most adaptable option, I would say that you get a Thinkpad Carbon. If you want something that feels like MacOS, Elementary OS linux distro is very close to that. If you just want max battery life, get a Mac.
And the graphic on the page is the opposite of what they are describing...
If you're enjoying it well enough this is typically not a concern. I do take breaks when the program is building though. Or when I'm not feeling it. Please don't try to replace your feelings by ridiculously rigid schemes.
Fascinating developments.

While a year ago China's willingness to come to the table would have been surprising to me... Now... Less surprising.

The US look poised for some very serious capability growth over the next few years. Limits make a lot of sense for the Chinese in this environment. Some of these advancements could greatly erode what strengths they have managed to consolidate.
The National Interest has very close ties to the Kremlin, so take what they print with several grains of salt.
To definitively prove this either way, they'll have to make their source code and model available (maybe under subpoena and/or gag order), so don't expect this issue to be actually tested in court (so long as the defendants have enough VC money).
Why is it that some experts say stuff falls into the center of a black hole while others say it slows down and never passes the event horizon? Is it just semantics?
It's not a proposal with a detailed implementation spec, it's a problem statement.
> AFAIU it's impossible by definition for any information to escape black hole insides. Any observation or experiment is not possible

this doesnt precisely follow. observation or experiment is possible from within the event horizon, although this might limit plausible venues for publication
Seems like the site is down :(
I think, when making a gesture, you need to consider its practical impact, which includes whether and how it will be understood (or not).

In the OpenAI case, the gesture of "forgoing millions of dollars" directly makes you able to do something you couldn't - speak about OpenAI publicly. In the Grigory Perelman case, obviously the message was far less clear to most people (I personally have heard of him turning down the money before and know the broad strokes of his story, but had no idea that that was the reason).
Interesting notion. Perhaps the same is happening with LED lamps and fixtures now, in the UK. Every rental is flooded with lights in all kinds of shapes. They are sold extremely affordably everywhere. To me at this point the novelty has worn off and it looks tacky. Also, most damning, they aren’t replaceable or repairable so all it’s doing is creating future e-waste…
The 118th U.S. Congress one of the most unproductive in modern history
Doesn’t multicursor also require thinking about the exact motion, since if you do it wrong, there is no way to undo?
> catastrophic global warming and climate change will happen before we get AGI,

What are your timelines here? "Catastrophic" is vague but I'd put the climate change meaningfully affecting the quality of life of average westerner at end of century, while AGI could be before the middle of the century.
Sounds interesting. Can you point to some problems in this field or some books or courses? Thanks!
To be honest, you can just say “I don’t have anything to add on that subject” and people will get the impression. No one ever says that about companies they like so you know when people shut down that something was up.

“What was the company culture like?” “Etc. platitude so on and so forth”

“And I heard the CEO was a total dickbag. Was that your experience working with him?” “I don’t have anything to add on that subject”

Of course going back and forth on that won’t really work but to different people you can’t be expected to not say the nice things and then someone could build up a story based on that.
Nice. That, plus the first item I mentioned, real-time forwarding, would mean that fails would show up immediately in your sending program, rather than a possible bounce message from a forwarder. Anything that can reject mail should work that way. The recipient's final IMAP server, which may have spam filtering, should also pass back rejections as SMTP statuses. So, if you get the "send completed" from your sending SMTP client, that should mean it's in the recipient's mailbox waiting to be read. This would improve the user experience for person-to-person email.

This is completely backwards compatible, so it's quite do-able as an enhancement. Most email forwarders today are old and from the store-and-forward era, and from systems where opening large numbers of TCP connections was a problem.

There's a sub-status for rejected spam:

550 5.7.1 Delivery not authorized, message refused

That subcode list hasn't been changed since 2003. A few new codes would be useful. I'd suggest:

550 5.7.8 Message refused - spam
550 5.7.9 Message refused - not compliant with laws in recipient's region. (CAN-SPAM, etc.)
550 5.7.10 Message refused - phishing attempt / hostile code
550 5.7.11 Message refused - previous messages from same sender also refused

Let the spam filters talk back that way to the delivery services.
It would be useful if mail delivery services noted such statuses and gave the sender a spam strike.
They don't have to pay attention to that info, but the better ones would.
People very high up in a company / their field are not treated remotely the same as peons.

1)OpenAI wouldn't want the negative PR of pursuing legal action against someone top in their field; his peers would take note of it and be less willing to work for them.

2)The stuff he signed was almost certainly different from what rank and file signed, if only because he would have sufficient power to negotiate those contracts.
You think you can reliably identify AI text?
What do you mean? It looks nothing like cursive cyrillic handwriting.

A couple of characters can be tricky at first because they look different to late modern latin script, like the s that has two forms in this font. It's actually very easy to read for being an old book.
The closer you are to the black hole the slower the time passes.
Sounds like the type of thing one would borrow from Geordie Laforge.
Frame of reference. The object falling in experiences time as normal and actually falls in.

From an outside observer they never cross the event horizon, due to the time dilation mentioned by the other comment.
I think that was an extremely small rollout. I didn't even know they ever deployed it until I checked when I read your comment. The upgrade path is full fibre, which you can now finally get in alot of places.
but..... but... terrorists
A corporate dystopia is still better than extinction. (Assuming the latter is a reasonable fear)
It is also clear that you can read, since i wrote it.
You are envious of him.

Jealous is when you possess something you don’t want taken away by someone else
uBlock Origin works on Firefox mobile.
It's also really weird equity: you don't get an ownership stake in the company but rather profit-sharing units. If OpenAI ever becomes profitable (color me skeptical), you can indeed get rich as an employee. The other trigger is "achieving AGI", as defined by sama (presumably). And while you wait for these dubious events to occur you work insane hours for a mediocre cash salary.
Evaluating Congress by "laws passed" feels a lot like evaluating programmers by "lines committed."

Personally I would like a lot fewer ridiculous laws to be passed.
Don't Trust Us; One-Click P2P Encrypted Chat and Video Call on Saito
I think only the last photons at the event horizon of you never escape the event horizon. So as you're falling toward the horizon you're colour shifting as the photons move slower and slower until you cross the event horizon at which point your last reflected photons outward speed matches their inward gravity and they freeze, balanced on the edge. You actually keep falling toward the singularity but no one will ever see you after the horizon because any reflected photons can't escape the gravity well.

You won't actually see the frozen photons though, just the ones before it. Once you see them, though, the image on the horizon is gone.
> Humans are not aligned with humans.

Which is why creating a new type of intelligent entity that could be more powerful than humans is a very bad idea: we don't even know how to align the humans and we have a ton of experience with them
There are lots of contract manufacturers, especially in China. But they will want a ready to manufacture design and an up front commitment for thousands of units. Prototyping generally requires many iterations.

Hardware is very hard. e.g. https://www.luminary-labs.com/insight/why-hardware-is-hard/

When you have the financial resources to outsource the hard bits, it is doable.
CVE reviewed by GitHub: GitHub advisory database official repo
Can LLM’s invent a new simple algorithm like this which it has never seen before? I tried to induce ChatGPT to invent this algorithm, giving it hints along the way, but it came up with something else that I’m unsure is correct. Then again, most humans wouldn’t be able to do that either. But how intelligent is AI if it can’t invent anything truly novel and significant?
Computer science traditionally focuses on algorithms. Divide-and-conquer algorithms are frequently much more clearly expressed as recursion. Quicksort is the classic example, also various tree operations.
Publish and perish.
This is an absolutely miserable way to take notes. iPad, too. I just don’t understand why anyone would prefer a tablet for taking detailed notes instead of using paper.
Why your voice assistant might be sexist
I once knew a freelancer who made the majority of his money by operating a dozen or so micro saas platforms and then signing up all of his clients for them to complete his contracts, turning his short-term engagements into substantial recurring revenue. Of course all of the companies were in the names of his family members.

He was happy and his clients were happy. Win win.
Can you explain why you expected this from the title? When I hear „network routing“, the first thing that comes into my mind is IP routing, not a reverse proxy. With a „homelab“, I‘d never associate the need for a reverse proxy or SSL certificates.
IIRC, it depends on the frame of the observer.

An outsider will see in-falling objects slow down, redshift, and never cross the horizon; but if you're falling in, this happens in finite time, you don't get to see the universe rapidly age, the black hole doesn't evaporate from Hawking radiation before you reach it.
Doesn't even have to be a surprise. Pretty much startup employment agreement in existence gives the company ("at the board's sole discretion") the right to repurchase your shares upon termination of employment. OpenAI's PPUs are worth $0 until they become profitable. Guess which right they'll choose to exercise if you don't sign the NDA?
Compared to specialized sub reddits, HN is huge. I find the content to be generally extremely accessible. Of course, there are some specialized subjects and links to research papers few will understand. But even for those, if you ask nicely, there will be a kind soul who will try to explain.
I don’t see why it wouldn’t be superhuman if there’s any intelligence at all. It already is superhuman at memory and paying attention, image recognition, languages, etc. Add cognition to that and humans basically become pets. Trouble is nobody has a foggiest clue on how to add cognition to any of this.
I'm pretty sure G.Fast was never actually deployed for NBN FTTC. It was planned/announced in 2021-2022, but eventually NBN came about their senses and decided to do FTTC -> FTTP upgrades like they're doing for FTTN.
When YCR HARC folded, Sam had everyone sign a non-disclosure anti disparagement NDA to keep their computer. I thought is was odd, and the only reason I can even say this is that I bought the iMac I was using before the option became available. Still, I had nothing bad to disclose, so it would have saved me some money.