skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I refused to sign all these secrecy non-disclosure contracts years ago. You know what? It was the right decision. Even though, as a result, my current economic condition is what most would describe as 'disastrous', at least my mind is my own.
All your classified BS, it's not so much. Any competent thinker could have figured it out on their own.

Fucking monkeys.
DeepNotes – open-source end-to-end encrypted note-taking tool w/ realtime collab
Here's the repo: https://github.com/DeepNotesApp/DeepNotes
General Electric

Fukushima's BWRs were GE, Hitachi, and Toshiba. It doesn't matter who the official brand is on the side because they're integrated and supported on-site using consulting companies who probably designed them and probably worked for both or all 3 companies at some point.

Sorry, not entirely correct: https://www.westinghousenuclear.com/nuclear-fuel/boiling-wat...

I worked for the company of one the main guys who designed BWR-4, consulted on BWRs, came up with SBWR (never used) and ABWR, and submitted ALWR plans to EPRI that never really went anywhere because of public relations and regulatory climate. ALWR became the basis of some SMRs like NuScale. WH and GE Hitachi SMRs are BWRs.
Anti frame is saying that free speech guarantee in Constitution only applies to the relationship between the government and the citizens, not between private entities.
Some users don’t have vouch capabilities.
Yeah, I worked with some that weren't able to do that. They were better off leaving the math part to others.
I came across this video the other day about another interesting NYPD toy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQIlrfrysEg

> Officers used a vehicle called the "bear" to get inside Hamilton Hall [at Columbia University] where many protestors were barricaded. FOX 5 NY's Linda Schmidt got an up close look at how the bear works.

They have two of these.
The concern isn't that they would invest bed on obviously wrong numbers. The concern is that someone invests based on believable numbers that are incorrect. There's no information on accuracy measures or verification. Offering this model to others could be an SEC/FINRA violation.
A web version of Anthropic's prompt engineering interactive tutorial
Wage increases outpaced inflation on the low end [1]. Still has a ways to go, minimum wage needs to get to at least $22/hr in most of the developed US to align with inflation current state. Also, importantly, no evidence of wage price spiral [2].

With regards to the anecdotes you mention, please ask them to report every incident to the FTC [3], the CFPB, the Dept of Labor, and any other relevant state or federal regulators. To action, they must be made aware.

[1] https://www.americanprogress.org/article/workers-paychecks-a...

[2] https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN12075

[3] https://reportfraud.ftc.gov/
Teams is in the same AI business. Better go with open source chats: https://itsfoss.com/open-source-slack-alternative/
So much for the "Open" in OpenAI
In the US, the Constitution prevents the government from regulating your speech.

It does not prevent you from entering into contracts with other private entities, like your company, about what THEY allow you to say or not. In this case there might be other laws about whether a company can unilaterally force that on you after the fact, but that's not a free speech consideration, just a contract dispute.

See https://www.themuse.com/advice/non-disparagement-clause-agre...
WinRAR 7.01 Released
You can do it worldwide on iPhone 12 and up iirc, you just bring it to the apple store and they do it in a few hours. Not user replaceable but better than the whole phone.
I believe a better solution to this would be to spread the following sentiment: "Since it's already illegal to tell disparaging lies, the mere existence of such a clause implies some disparaging truths to which the party is aware." Always assuming the worst around hidden information provides a strong incentive to be transparent.
Don't you think intermediate representation like SPIR-V would suffice in mostly eliminating stutter? Yuzu used that and shader stutter seemed to be minimal and I can image that the shaders generated by Yuzu are much more complex than Dolphin.
> Anecdotally, even though the Netherlands and my home country of the UK...

Statistics paint a different picture.

"Mobility on Dutch roads has grown continuously since the 1950s and now exceeds 200 billion km travelled per year. With a population of 16.8 million people, this comes down to an average of 32 kilometres (20 mi) per person per day" [1]

Avg UK car mileage per day in 2022 was 18[2]. Given cars are fewer than people, per capita mileage driven will be even lower.

That is also reflect in safety stats. Netherlands has death rates of 3.8/100K people, 4.7/1B vehicle-km. For UK, those numbers are 2.9 and 3.8 respectively [3]. So Netherlands just seems to have a reputation divergent from the actual reality? (I mean, no one talks about how awesome UK is for biking or public transport).

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_transport_in_the_Netherla...

[2] https://www.nimblefins.co.uk/cheap-car-insurance/average-car...

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_traffic-r...
I agree the information about the location of the source code is buried in the developer doc that you access when hitting contribute. I think an open source product could do better and make the source code more easily accessible.
You used the word "just" there, but I don't think storing hashed PII is necessarily an out here. Clearly, the whole point of the suggestion is that we can still match the person against a record, and the hashed device id or ip or email or whatever else is functioning as an identifier.
sed s/SVT/PBS/g se_SE > en_US
Exactly. There are actual people's wives out there with varying levels of "traditional-ness" just living their lives as homemakers, stay-at-home moms, having kids, going to church, and so on with no social media or political angle; and then there are the alt-right political-performative TradWives™ LARPing on social media. They're two totally different groups.
The first issue I have with AI art is that it is self-destructive. It outcompetes and devalues artists to a point where it is virtually impossible to survive by having art as a job, but learning from artists is the only reason why it can exist in the first place. It is a machine that destroys the very thing that gives it life.

The second issue is that AI does not learn like humans do. Two different people looking at the same image will not be inspired the same way, because humans are inspired subjectively. There is a layer between what you see and what you learn, because everyone is wired differently, there is creativity involved in this process. AIs are not like this, they are not creative and there is no subjectiveness, it is built on plagiarism.

So yes, I agree on not treating binary differently. When a human learns from other artists and applies it without any creative twist, we call it plagiarism. When an AI does it, we give it a pat on the back and say it's just learning from what it sees. Why should AI be treated any different?
Some of the taxes I pay have a 20% penalty for being a day late.
Sorry, someone at corporate has interpreted this statement as criticism. Please give back all equity, or an amount equivalent to its current value.
For those like me who are not familiar with the field... The article assumes you know the entire context - as far as I could see there is no explanation of any part except the technical details.

RAG = Retrieval-Augmented Generation

The field is machine learning. Retrieval = get relevant documents. Generation = create answer for user (based on the docs).
Right, but once you sell the shares, OpenAI isn't going to claw back the cash proceeds, is what I think was asked here.
But a general release is not a non-criticism clause.

They're not required to sign anything other than a general release of liability when they leave to preserve their rights. They don't have to sign a non-disparagement clause.

But they'd need a very good lawyer to be confident at that time.
Despite the hype, EV adoption in Europe is still slow, not sure if there is a market segment for this kind of car when the charging network is not ready to support it.
sign up here https://about.winamp.com/free-llama
SMTP already has the BDAT command where the size is sent first, and arbitrary bytes can be sent (unlike DATA).

SMTP already has versioning through extensions.

If you're banning an IP for exceeding a processing resource limit please keep the ban short. Presumably you can afford to process the first 128KB of one bad message per six hours, for instance. There should be no need to make a month-long or permanent ban, and these just hurt interoperability if the sender realizes their problem and fixes it, or if the address is reallocated.

Trying to limit data between the hello and the email data is futile, since the attacker can just flood you with random packets no matter whether you told them to stop (closed the connection) or not. You can only limit things you have control over, mostly your own memory usage, and how much data is accepted into more expensive processing stages.
It's so easy to fix, too.
what's that have to do with water?
If pacific squid are humboldt squid, they are limited to the eastern pacific ocean.
Doesn't it end up being a "no disparagement until the company goes public" clause, then? Once you sell the stock, are they going to come after you for the proceeds if you say something mean 20 years later?
Being able to compile to different hardware including GPUs and TPUs seems to be one of the core goals of Mojo based off what Chris Lattner was saying in his Lex Friendman interview. It doesn't seem to come up much on Modular website though, so I can see why you would think that.
Yes - it is well known there is no "secret investing sauce" - this has been proven over and over. The only people who tell you otherwise are people with something to sell you, or people who have tricked themselves into believing otherwise. This kind of stuff pops up whenever the market is on a tear.
The thinking that climate change / CO2 is any different from CFCs is the primary barrier in the way of meaningful action. It takes persistent leadership on an international basis to get people of the world to do things differently, overcome greed, ignorance, and resistance, and stop the Holocene from ending with mass starvation, mass migration, and tens of billions of unnecessary deaths.
and they are almost more powerful than email. Look how widely Discord is used, compared to email. Email might have more sites, but outside of corporate reminders, more communication happens on Discord.
If 0 is not useful reference, then the chart should have the X axis on top, to avoid the intuitive tendency to interpret the graph as a heigh chart.
I agree with Piper's point that these contracts aren't common in tech, but they're hardly unheard of. In 20 years of consulting work I've seen dozens of them. They're not uncommon. This doesn't look uniquely hostile or amoral for OpenAI, just garden-variety.
Unless you're saying that Chernobyl was a Soviet initiative... which wouldn't even be super wrong strictly speaking... But if that's not what you meant, and I'm pretty sure it wasn't, then no not really. I think it's hard to overstate how much Chernobyl scared people. If anything the Soviets had everything to win by making nuclear look safe back in the cold war. If you look at Soviet propaganda, nuclear technology was very prominent and a key part of the international image they wanted to project.
Modern AI companies depend entirely on goodwill and being trusted by their customers.

So yes, they're that fragile.
I think superalignment is absurd, and model "safety" is the modern AI company's "think of the children" pearl clutching pretext to justify digging moats. All this after sucking up everyone's copyright material as fair use, then not releasing the result, and profiting off it.

All due respect to Jan here, though. He's being (perhaps dangerously) honest, genuinely believes in AI safety, and is an actual research expert, unlike me.
The problem with email isn't due to a technical problem with email. It's because:

(1) there exists a messaging system where you can message anyone else in the world without prior contact

and (2) it is an open standard anyone can implement.

So even if you made Email2, it would have the same problems.

People will violate any spec you write and Email2 will not fix that. Encryption isn't a thing because no one cares about it and Email2 will not make people care. The most complex part about email is email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) and trust but Email2 will still ultimately be have to be based on "how long you've been around" because email is not intrinsically linked to a real identity that has been licensed.
I run several of the smallest email sending services on the internet. Been doing it for 26 years or so.

{rest of your comment ... verbatim!}

Email doesn't need fixing or a v2. I've run GroupWise, Exchange, Lotus (various flavours but never peppermint) and others too. For me, for little systems: Dovecot (IMAP) + Exim (MTA) is a golden combo.

Email_v1 itself is just complicated enough without being too funky. You bolt on TLS/SSL and the rest. MX records are a simplified form of SRV records (I think MX came first but the point holds) and remove the requirement for gateway load balancers and clustering technologies if you don't want to do all that stuff.

Nothing is perfect but email does deliver a lot more significant messages than any other method from before or since its inception.
Sierra was captured, then killed, by an accounting fraud (2020)
> You probably want to normalize if you want to use them as keys in a hash table, which is pretty common.

Not necessarily. Sometimes this might be useful, but sometimes it will just make it worse.

> Does the invalid byte go with the 1st or the 2nd? What about multiple invalid bytes?

What seems to me the most logical way to do it, if you do not then need to decode it into Unicode code point numbers, is: If the byte is in range 0x80 to 0xBF, then it belongs to the same code point as the previous byte; otherwise, the byte is the start of a new code point. (However, this does not answer the question of what if the first byte is in range 0x80 to 0xBF?)

However, that is usually unnecessary. Splitting a string by Unicode code points is rarely helpful (unless you want to convert to UTF-16 or UTF-32) and is often harmful, anyways. Just use sequences of bytes.

> if you're allowing invalid UTF-8 you're giving up Unicode support entirely, by necessity.

It is often useful to do regular expressions on sequences of bytes instead of on sequences of Unicode code points anyways; and if you have ASCII only, then doing it this way is more efficient anyways (even if the text contains non-ASCII characters).

(PCRE has a UTF-8-oriented mode and byte-oriented mode, so both are possible.)

Also, you can match a UTF-8 code point (or a character code in EUC-JP or some other multibyte encoding) with a byte-oriented regular expression if you need to, anyways, so still you might not need Unicode regular expressions.

> another section discusses how the length of a string is not a well defined quantity

I think that the number of bytes is generally the most useful measure, although in some contexts it is useful to measure something else.
Multi AI agent systems using OpenAI's assistants API
Before the single currency, the Euro, the southern countries, aka the PIGS, Portugal, Italy, Greece, Span and somewhat Ireland went through cycles of politicians overspending, running up huge debt then printing enormous amounts of local currency which paid off debt and devalued their national currencies.

In Italy, in the 1970s the small change disappeared, the coins were worth more as scrap metal than as money.

The European single currency links the countries together so that 'quantitative easing' transfers wealth from the German savers and pensioners to the spendthrifts.

This is slowly playing out, I suspect it will be another twenty or thirty years until the full effect is seen.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act#A...
When I click the link, I see nothing about Open AI in the tweet displayed.

This is not a valid form of discourse.
"Inflation" is one thing. Rent prices and cost of living in a city with jobs is a very different thing.

>please ask them to report every incident to the FTC, the Dept of Labor, and any other relevant state or federal regulator.

No. If my friend doesn't even have time to make 3 stops around town to collect maximum allowed money orders for their landlord (who recently started requiring money orders for some reason) because they understandably don't have a bank account because they can't risk the fees, I would simply lose them as a friend if I made such an out-of-touch suggestion.
Free speech is a much more general notion than anything having to do with governments.

The first amendment is a US free speech protection, but it's not prototypical.

You can also find this in some other free speech protections, for example that in the UDHR

>Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

doesn't refer to states at all.
These same companies that manufacture and distribute BPC-157 and bodybuilding drugs already also offer various GLP1 drugs, semaglutide, tirzepatide, retatrutide. Google around and you can find them available for much cheaper via grey market vendors.
About time for easily and properly redistributable (plus self-contained, authenticated, etc) web sites/content...
The complex formats of tiff and tga specifications makes it nearly impossible to span all the edge-cases with unit-tests. A VM can be in a known-state snapshot, process pre/post signature logged/compared with a scripted debugger, and binary input/output stripped of non-compliant metadata/blobs at each stage of the pipeline if the process behaves as expected.

I've yet to find a better method than Honeypots to sustainably mitigate the complex leaky dependency mess on traditional architectures. It has been my experience that "all software is terrible, but some of it is useful".

It may just be my bias, but I see code smell getting worse in recent decades...

Have a nice day, =3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCbfMkh940Q
They already are. Weight loss clinics will send the Rx to a compounding pharmacy.
Plus what he (allegedly) did to his sister when she was a child: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37785072
That's not what that article says, if I'm understanding correctly: "PPUs all have the same value associated with them and, during a tender offer, investors purchase PPUs directly from employees. OpenAI makes offers and values their PPUs based on the most recent price investors have paid to purchase employee PPUs."
I'm no lawyer but this sounds like something that would not go well for OpenAI if strongly litigated
> Constrast with UTF-16, where a substring might match the bytes at an odd index in the original string, corresponding to totally different characters.

This is not a problem if you have the correct alignment; since it works on 16-bit units then you would be searching/indexing/splitting on such boundaries. There are surrogates, but you can easily self-delimit them like you can with UTF-8, too.
https://dangerzone.rocks/
as an exit contract?
Not part of a severance agreement?

Boomberg famously used this as an employment contract, and it was a campaign scandal for Mike.
I think we need to face the fact that these companies aren’t trustworthy in upholding their own stated morals. We need to consider whether streaming video from our phone to a complex AI system that can interpret everything it sees might have longer term privacy implications. When you think about it, a cloud AI system is an incredible surveillance machine. You want to talk to it about important questions in your life, and it would also be capable of dragnet surveillance based on complex concepts like “show me all the people organizing protests” etc.

Consider for example that when Amazon bought the Ring security camera system, it had a “god mode” that allowed executives and a team in Ukraine unlimited access to all camera data. It wasn’t just a consumer product for home users, it was a mass surveillance product for the business owners:

https://theintercept.com/2019/01/10/amazon-ring-security-cam...

The EFF has more information on other privacy issues with that system:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/08/amazons-ring-perfect-s...

These big companies and their executives want power. Withholding huge financial gain from ex employees to maintain their silence is one way of retaining that power.
it actually closed in 1969 (or 1957).
Also, whatever fries left in the bottom of the bag. That’s corporate property buddy.
Nopes. I am not deep into how email works, but always had this genuine curiosity. Unless, your reply was for the reply to this comment ;)
Adding a disclaimer for people unaware of context (I feel same as you):

OpenAI made a large commitment to super-alignment in the not-so-distant past. I beleive mid-2023. Famously, it has always taken AI Safety™ very seriously.

Regardless of anyone's feelings on the need for a dedicated team for it, you can chalk to one up as another instance of OpenAI cough leadership cough speaking out of both sides of it's mouth as is convenient. The only true north star is fame, glory, and user count, dressed up as humble "research"

To really stress this: OpenAI's still-present cofounder shared yesterday on a podcast that they expect AGI in ~2 years and ASI (superpassing human intelligence) by end of the decade.
I only once tried to participate to a subreddit /r/instax.

I could leave comment but I could not post to ask a technical question or share my own instax shots. My posts were just commented by a bot saying they were moved to a temporarily queue waiting for approval and later were deleted. No communication about rules that would apply, nor the reasons of the deletion.

I just never bothered anymore. To me reddit is pretty much a dead platform.
JavaScript isn’t obfuscated.

It’s ulgified and minified.

Uglification is the process where function names and other items are shortened into smaller names which reduces the payload size

For example

MyFunction(){

Const myVar = 5

}

Could become

a(){const b= 5}
Isn’t obesity responsible for massive healthcare costs? What about quality of life?
Mystery in the Alps: A Chinese Family, Swiss Inn, World's Most Expensive Weapon
You're comparing CPU cores to GPU cores!

It is "only" 50x because a single GPU core is 100x weaker than a CPU core!

Within CUDA cores, it is actually a linear speedup! It does 2k MIPS with 1 CUDA core, and ~28000 MIPS with 16k CUDA cores. If we double the performance of single-core GPU evaluation, we almost double the performance with 16k cores!
lmao i always get surprised to see my own posts end up on here
Humans respond better to concrete details than abstractions.

It's a lot of mental work to rally the emotion of revulsion over the evil they might be doing that is kept secret.
Talking to a lawyer is **never** bad advice.

Especially in CA where companies will make you THINK they have power which they don’t.
https://archive.ph/4q7Zr
He's also on HN:
https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=jurgenwerk
I don't know what a fusion splicer is but I want one