skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
12.3 million is pretty down there though, that no one thinks the building is even worth the loan amount, and that the loan amount was at least 10% (I bet it was much higher though) indicates the building isn’t worth much.
I've been meaning to do something similar but slap HTTP in front of it and use a bookmarklet. It seems like this script is both the daemon and the submitter though? That's nice.
Great attention to detail! I, like the parent, was surprised by the quality as well. However now I can't unsee it:-)
These are well considered facts that are part of a larger focus on Tesla and Musk's handling of the company.

Given the seemingly bizarre moves of late, I think it's interesting to get more context.
I don't see how this prevents economics from taking over. If nobody bid over 12 million, thats a signal that nobody thought it was worth say 20 million. Otherwise they would have bid.
> the average Catholic school is more likely to turn your child into an atheist than into a convinced Catholic

Most serious Catholics I know agree with this, btw.
How the hell is it climate change denial for someone to speak at all of a completely different problem from that of human-caused climate change? It is possible to be interested in and worried about different things simultaneously.

Absurdly intolerant claims like yours border on similarity to a hysterical, religious fervor against the idea of praying to any other god.
He means people not born into significant privilege
This looks nice to me. Sort of reminds me of cython and to a lesser extent nim. And I sort of like cython, except I rarely end up using it in practice because I find that you end up dealing with three languages - python, cython and C - or even four, if you're also trying to use C++. (At least back when I was using it, direct cython to C++ interfacing wasn't available yet). And the borders between them were a bit fuzzy sometimes - you'd have to see the compiled C output to find out where you forgot to cdef a variable. If you use pybind11 then you just have to deal with python and C++ (though admittedly the metatemplate programming used for wrapping is a bit of wizardry).

So getting better performance in a single python-ish language with a bit of extra syntax seems promising to me, but I admit I've yet to try this. I'll wait to see if a good ecosystem gets built around it.
India offers remarkable value in all listed indexes except the Local Purchasing Power Index.
> Most of my time is spent thinking about the domain space, constraints and processing flows.

This is the ideal place to add the most value, since a generic LLM will be weakest here.
I grew up playing 1/72nd tabletop wargames with my dad and his friends - Napoleonic to WW2 usually. Often with Star Wars/Trek or Babylon 5 on the TV.

This was our 3am conversations.
> It's a recurring pattern across industries:

Great summary.

> ARM, or the Intel <-> VIA saga are just some well known examples.

They are well known because of the intent, not so much the saga. With almost everyone having had manufacturing in China disputes were bound to happen.

There are government backed entities that aren't for business. From day 1 their intent was to "steal" technology. They weren't investing in the industry. Via and by extension HTC were victims rather than culprits.
Funny that it doesn't use the MIT license
I remux into ogg which still supports Opus but seemed to have wider player support. Great way to get tracks that don't seem to be available anywhere other than streaming.
The smarter birds are easier to study. As are the great apes and dolphins. Research has been finding it isn't brain size so much as density and architecture of particular parts that leads to what we call 'intelligence', and I would assume what we could call a 'conversation'. Not that we shouldn't study whale songs, but that the scope is much larger than you indicated. We can communicate with gorillas with English words (but not English grammar last I heard?), but I'm not sure if we even know what noises and gestures gorillas make that are communication or are just them clearing their throats. But I've gone past studies working out the vocabularies of birds and meerkats.
It's pretty common for students to incur that much debt if they get both a Bachelor's and Master's degree from private colleges. Obviously this is not a smart financial decision, and the federal government shouldn't be encouraging it with subsidized student loans.

"More than 800 people applied this year for roughly 72 spots in the film MFA program, which can total nearly $300,000 for tuition, fees and living expenses."

https://www.wsj.com/articles/financially-hobbled-for-life-th...
Not that I believe that conscription causes revolution, but if by "The Eastern Block" you mean the Warsaw Pact countries in Central and Eastern Europe, those regimes lasted about 40 years before being overthrown by revolution...

Not exactly what I would call "pretty stable"
Loom in the title got my attention. It is the only reason I clicked on the link.

It is unfortunate this is being discussed rather than the product.
please publish it!
Laypeople have known what MP3s are since Napster was making headlines. Laypeople have mostly never heard of MP4.
In this case since YouTube will provide it in Opus, Opus is the best choice, so that you're not re-encoding from lossy to lossy.
Doesn't work with DASH
All this overstimulation is driven by marketing. Nothing really changed except the rate of consumption of information.

Staying focused is more important than ever. Not enough people know how or care to fight all these nasty attempts to move their locus of control outside themselves. Once you know what you want out of life it's much easier to keep things in control.

As the old Simpson's episode said: "just don't look".
Note: it may not be immediately apparent, but all constant-coefficient linear recurrence relations of any complexity can be straightforwardly solved with this technique.
Angry IP Scanner: fast and simple, cross-platform, open-source network scanner
Yeah. I even checked screenshots and all they show is a $ prompt.
When fiction’s grounded like this, even if much of it is fantastical, you can have fun filling in gaps this way. It’s fertile ground for BSing about. Stuff kinda makes sense, just as a consequence of the media taking inspiration from the real and the familiar, and from the writers trying not to do anything too silly in ways that would strain credulity to the point that they break immersion.

If you write your fiction like a couple of 6-year-olds making up stories with toys in a sandbox, where there’s far less grounding in real world events and context, and plot beats or world-building elements are more likely to occur solely for the script-writer’s convenience than because they seem plausible and appropriate… well. You get what the author alludes to at the tail end of the piece.
> This isn’t just a niche issue either: this is a very real consideration for any corporate user

Very true, but I'd wish this "common" knowledge is more widespread. Security is a major issue commonly overlooked. People do a lot of insecure things for convenience.
Here's a modern version for Euclid's Elements- https://www.c82.net/euclid/
Fun fact and actually the law in Germany is that if you change your gender and the army calls for war your original gender counts.

Army recruitment is when the fun is over.
The company is paying the people working by providing a free service.

It's like youtube. Youtube provides a free hosting of your videos. In exchange they monetize them. You're free to host them on your own servers. That will likely cost you way more than putting them on youtube. So you're getting something from them. You're also getting their advertising service to monetize your videos. You could do it yourself, hire a bunch of people and try to get companies to put ads on your self-hosted videos. Again, unless you're wildly successful it's unlikely you'll be able to do that and make a profit. So, youtube is effectively paying you.

Same with Stack Overflow. They're providing the servers, the bandwidth, etc. It costs them $. They're providing that service to you.
Probably a small-audience exercise (for those familiar with all the parties during the 90s; at most a few million people), but as an example of successful sausage making and consensus politics, see the Preamble to the Constitution, and assign each sentence or phrase to the party which most likely convinced all the others it was reasonable to include.
Sharks with frickin laser beams!
Because you want to offload all the work of rendering onto the client. And in fact you'd often want the rendering to be sensitive to the browser context. Different types of devices may require a different UI or arrangement of content. All that logic would be client logic. Why would you treat a browser different from any other client?

The presentation aspect is simply not the concern of the server in the first place. Data is not presentation and servers should be able to support more than one client. Data should be not be encapsulated in several layers of presentation. Having to scrape data from a web page is ugly and dumb.
And then one starts to cry, and right or wrong doesn’t matter any more and the conflict ends.

It’s the same with the countries.

Standing up to bullies can work.
Note the final points of their reasoning:

> Q: If I make a derivative work based on your project (e.g. use your library), would I need to also include your terms of use in my own project?

> A: No, you don't have to do that. But I won't stop you if you want to.
To me copilot feels like a natural extension of vim. Vim is world class for editing code and copilot is incredible at generating code.
> To what extent this may be driven by the new project shaped in a copilot "friendly" way?

Not OP, but this is the vast majority of the improvement I've seen.
You're talking right past them though: you were working on a side quest you had interest and bandwidth to iterate on.

I agree with the parent comment, my pipeline is already saturated with side quests, I'm already iterating on a bunch of random fun work, and side-project work and work work. So often times the most "LLM-heavy" projects of mine are things I straight up would not do if I didn't have something to get the ball rolling other than more of my own free time which is already in short supply.

Hopping from direct answer to direct answer isn't where I find wonder/fun in programming anyways, but sometimes you don't have bandwidth for the side quest to be fun or wonderous.
I had a similar thing happen in my meditation practice early on, and gave it up for many years after because of the anxiety. I eventually got back to it and found a lot of insight from Thich Nhay Hanh’s translation of the Heart Sutra. My teacher likes to point out that encountering the extreme anxiety or dread is actually a good sign, that it’s a natural reaction of your ego or sense of self trying to protect itself. But it’s probably best to be working with a teacher when you’re at that point, just to avoid needless confusion and to move past that anxiety or fear.

You also definitely want to accomplish something specific in your practice, namely to move past suffering. The first step of any formal meditation session is to bring up your motivation for sitting in the first place.
It is good. Maybe add an option to save results as a PDF or Long Image.
I'll give you an answer for how we have used them - essentially, helping set context (indeed, we have context statements as well).

DEI activities often take a lot of time, and are often undervalued by many traditional academic metrics - they don't produce papers, rarely produce grants outside perhaps the occasional diversity supplement, etc. As a small example, to ensure that undergraduate research experience isn't reserve for those without the need to take summer jobs, I ensure all the undergraduates in my lab are paid - and this costs my lab money I don't technically have to spend. Many of my colleagues do a great deal more.

Having a required DEI statement both lets people who work in these areas highlight their work, and also makes it obvious those who don't. It's a way to do something beyond just saying "These activities are important" by moving them to the forefront.

All that being said, they are often used in a very perfunctory fashion, and while I do somewhat agree with the idea of them, in practice they've not proved useful.
I am so confused. When I write code, I think "Okay I want to write a for loop that does xyz." How is it hard to know if copilot did or didn't do what you wanted?
It's almost a myth these days that you need top end GPUs to run models. Some smaller models (say <10B parameters with quantization) run on CPUs fine. Of course you won't have hundreds of tokens per sec, but you'll probably get around ~10 or so, which can be sufficient depending on your use case.
But is it actually a solution to any of them?

The "chance of hallucinations" is the tricky bit - if I have to manually check everything it does in case it's hallucinating, then it's not actually a solution. It's not saving me time (as TFA says).
He also gave so many actors their first break. Just copying from the news: Peter Fonda, Jack Nicholson, Dennis Hopper, Bruce Dern, Diane Ladd, William Shatner, to name a few.

While we're on it, what are some of your favorites? I probably don't know some of the movies I watched made/produced by him.

I know I've always loved "Death Race 2000" (1975). Actually like the re-make too "Death Race" (2008) (and he's listed as an executive producers for that too). The 2008 one really has nothing to do with the 1975 one except for re-using some names but both are good fun.
When I heard of Loom, my first thought went to that classic Lucas Arts adventure game. The name is shared by so many different things, it isn't descriptive of anything.
Very recently, the motivating purpose behind every post is to wrap thin content around affiliate links to Amazon.
Cryptography + guerrila warfare go hand and hand. AI too if you'd believe it. Look to history.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S156625352...
NB: tome in Microtome has the same root as the T in CAT scan: computer aided tomography. Which is to say, slimly-sliced cabbage^W X-ray scans.

It's also the tome as in book, more properly one volume of a multi-volume (or multi-part) set, though it now generally simply means any large book.

<https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=tome>
Yes, I don't think the poster was implying that.
Wonder what this all says about free will.
And the emotional systems of the brain are some of the last to develop. It's good to teach youth that there are these things called emotions (for the most inept) and they do matter. But don't expect too much from it.
One of the things it does do is separate people who treat it as a box checking exercise from the people who approach it seriously.
Here is the blog post from Project CETI that did the research

https://www.projectceti.org/blog-posts/sperm-whale-phonetic-...

Ridiculous how many articles repeat the NYT'$ paywalled headline but don't report any sources.
Watching the location is a bad idea. I’d hazard a guess that most forwarding agencies have more than 1 customer, so you’ll be on a bunch of wild goose chases.

Also forwarding agencies probably don’t visit the clients locations often.
It wouldn't hurt if the key sentence from your first paragraph was in the top two paragraphs of the landing page.
I'm not saying he's wrong, but that is a rather convenient position for him to take.
My understanding of OP:

Say the loan amount on the building is 100m

you know you ain't getting for less than that because the lender will bid up to there at least if anyone is bidding. You think it's worth 20m? Go home, that bid will not win and everyone knows it. You bid 20, lender outbids you. you bid 30, again outbid as far as the loan amount at least. This 12.3M is the equivalent of the auction being passed in with a reserve price of the loan amount, whatever that amount is, possibly much higher than 12.3M. In this circumstance the auction is a farce and you could not buy it for 12.3M+ or anything like it.

I can't vouch for the truth or accuracy of _any_ of that, but I believe that is the point being made.
We have the data to show that mindfulness works, however I think we underestimate the pull or grasp that social media has. It’s hard to implement mindfulness when everything is vying for your attention.
It's honestly even more subtle than this. I absolutely agree with you about talking on the phone. I avoid doing things when I know it will mean I have to call ahead - and I would much rather go down there in person and get looked at weird for making an appointment in person.

Yet I've worked 4 different call center jobs and had absolutely no issue talking to people on the phone there. (Probably largely because the "small-talk" in such a scenario is absolutely rote and mundane...)

Fast-forward to my current job (IT) and I hate answering the phone (or joining a meeting) again.
Highly relevant as we march towards this future:

https://www.ted.com/talks/daniel_suarez_the_kill_decision_sh...

Luckily it sounds like a human is still in the loop for this nightmare fuel, but I fear for the day this isn’t true.
Under regular circumstances criticism is valuable, but it’s very difficult to tell what is valid vs what is concocted via the media hype cycles.

2 years ago it was “rocket man: bad”, now it’s “electric car man: bad”.

The ‘missteps’ pointed out by these who ‘know better’ are about the equivalent of someone who can beat three of their friends in chess deeming magnus carlsen a fool for playing moves they don’t have the faintest idea how to analyse or comprehend.
Those numbers don't take into account the cost of achieving world peace. The plans admit that people will still starve in wars. However, those numbers include things like creating more conflict-resilient infrastructure so fewer people starve in that case.

Currently people are starving from lack of immediate money for food, for infrastructure to deliver it, etc. The interest off of the combined fortunes of Bezos and Gates would be enough to fix all the non-violent causes.

Obviously, their fortunes are insufficient to fix climate change or achieve world peace. But world hunger is an actual solvable problem.
Anybody have a good open-source receipt data extraction tool for PDFs?
> not every difference can be accommodated in every situation, even if disability advocates don’t always want to admit it

That's why labor law generally has the concept of "reasonable accommodations" and core parts of the job. I don't think anyone is seriously saying that every disabled person can do any job.
Cutting the right corners is known as job smarts in the research on expertise, and it's one of the markers of expertise.

Perhaps Steve Jobs wasn't an expert in engineering so he didn't know which corners to cut and therefore avoided cutting any corners out of fear of cutting the wrong one?
Nowt is used in the north of England to mean nothing.
In some cases where I often use it I find it easy. Usually I give an ORM class and ask it to parse to mysql / postgres create table. Tedious tasks and easy to review.

Another time I asked to generate a code to listen to SMTP server using a library, and again it's easier to review because I was not familiar with the library. From that I can make my own adjustment.
This is how I've used it:
"I want to write a function that reduces a map of customer data to a list of their
phone numbers from their primary addresses only or contact address if there is no primary address"

and then you look at the resulting flatmap, filter, reduce blob of AI generated code and figure out if what it does is correct for about a minute.
I'm pretty sure the internal heating of the Hindenburg was hydrogen powered.
The better alternative is to root for AMD and others to develop their own products so that regardless of breaking NV up or not, there are alternative solutions for people to use. They all leapfrog each other with new releases now any way. Why put all your eggs into one basket.
I think it's unlikely to convince Linus and the myriad other contributors to change the license, but if you want to tilt at windmills, go ahead. A whole lot more likely than convincing Oracle.
@cess11 on Golang, no, rather Ken Thompson and colleagues designed a language stripped off things they find as an unnecessary cruft and they could finally get back to the fun they had before Java and OO.
I am sorry, I don't understand the question...

If you mean a "twit" then there is a few things going for Hot-Takes.io;

1. Not a social media in the full sense, no photos of someone's kids, no porn,
onlyfans promos nor child trafficking (looking at you Facebook)

2. One of the key features is to implement AI to prevent you from posting any of the above mention things.

3. Login will always be through a 3rd party that already verify your email. for now to keep it technical I am using GitHub Auth

4. This is for Hot-Takes only not for posting pictures of you with a tiger.

5. IF (big if) one day we allow ads it will be in a hot take form like "Koqua Kola is the best soda" and you will be allowed to react to it as any other regular take

6. Community Driven and transparent, all algorithms would be public.

7. Thinking of a feature to allow you to post takes anonymously.
These features keeps me solidly with ZFS (since a decade):

0. Cross-platform (I use ZFS on Linux, FreeBSD, and [previously] macOS).

1. Pervasive check-summing/scrubbing, protection from silent bitrot

2. Low-cost COW snapshots (which can be directly accessed with ~/.zfs/snapshot)

3. Steaming file system state with zfs send / zfs receive (this is super important for backup and replication)

AFAIK, no other FS has all of this.
Selling at a massive discounted value coupled with very short notice on what is being sold... doesn't this just lend itself to collusion between those that know when properties will be put up for 'auction' to ensure that the right friends get a heads up beforehand?.

This is of course a rhetorical question as I've met quite a few people whose fortune can all be traced back to having good friends in the right places. This is all sort of open secret so its not illegal but it is a form of corruption of the system.
This is in the article: if you aren't using the tensor cores, you aren't utilizing ~94% of the FLOPs available.
There are many reasons, and as a user of Opus you are probably aware of the trade offs?
BUT Feel free to sign in and post a take "This should be just a Tweet"
Years ago, over a decade ago now, I was a .Net developer. Microsoft introduced Entity Framework, their new way of handling data in .Net applications. Promises made, promises believed, we all used it. I was especially glad of Lazy Loading, where I didn't have to load data from the database into my memory structures; the system would do that automatically. I could write my code as if all my memory structures were populated and not worry about it. Except, it didn't work consistently. Every now and again a memory structure would not be populated, for no apparent reason. Digging deep into technet, I found a small note saying "if this happens, then you can check whether the data has been loaded by checking the value of this flag and manually loading it if necessary" [0]. So, in other words, I have to manually load all my data because I can't trust EF to do it for me. [1]

Long analogy short, this is where I think AI for coding is now. It gets things wrong enough that I have to manually check everything it does and correct it, to the point where I might as well just do it myself in the first place. This might not always be the case, but that's where I feel it is right now.

[0] Entity Framework has moved on a lot since then, and apparently now can be trusted to lazily load data. I don't know because...

[1] I spat the dummy, replaced Windows with Linux, and started learning Go. Which does exactly what it says it does, with no magic. Exactly what I needed, and I still love Go for this.
SerenityOS is probably your best shot, although it’s definitely not ready to be a daily driver yet.