skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's the point. In many respects, community life is just a polite facade.
Seems fair enough. Why was the factory allowed to be built there if it threatens the drinking water?
The thing is, paying SpaceX's going rate for launch only adds a tiny sliver to the cost of a "Hubble-sized" telescope. Launch costs have become very cheap thanks to SpaceX - whether they donate it or not is somewhat like an American family getting a 100% discount on rice...it's not going to change their overall monthly food costs, because rice is already so cheap.
Cant really compare these at all. Hotjar is for tracking heatmaps and recordings from your regular site visitors.

Jam is for your employees to download an extension and manually submit the recordings when they have issues and is a pay per employee based model.

Jam will generally have very low volume compared to Hotjar which is where the price difference really is
> the original, theoretical scenario did not foresee the negative feedback loops that actually occurred

Several of those feedback loops came from people seeing the theoretical scenario and the evidence for it mounting. Like literally the phrase "if we don't do something - this will happen" is the rallying cry. It's silly to say it was an oversight in the model that shows that things need to be done.

> If life is so miserable why would people continue to have so many children?

Something humans like to do to escape misery is: sex.
Or a 7000 acre reservoir for a nuclear plant: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Texas_Nuclear_Generati...
I am thinking some efficient RAG experience. E.g. you can ask "Tell me about the Donald Trump trial."
Do you have a a cite for this? Googling "step-up in basis cap" finds very little supporting the assertion, at first glance, and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stepped-up_basis doesn't mention such a thing.

I think you're may be confusing it with estate taxes. (Which the ProPublica article addresses in the subsequent few paragraphs.)
> It sounds like Linux is not a priority now?

The "probably Linux" line was when I was thinking of using .NET MAUI for the GUI, and they were considering adding Linux support. My bad, I need to change that.

.NET MAUI has decided not to do that, so I'm going to build the GUI with Avalonia, which does have Windows / MacOS / Android / iOS and Linux desktop support, as well as WASM support, all from the same code base.

If I weren't using a cross-platform GUI framework like Avalonia, I really might not bother with a Linux GUI, or at least deprioritize it; I expect most Linux devs will just use the CLI. I'm totally curious how much GUI usage there will be on Linux...
Archive link: https://archive.ph/BQoS0
So in the end they reduced the attack surface for a program running on your computer by increasing the attack surface on the meatbag operating the computer? (i.e. browser integration which is the only effective thing against phishing)

Seems like a good deal /s
As a maintainer that just makes it worse. Familiarity with the code base is typically necessary to make a good quality contribution. Issues are a sign of love, imo, because they don’t want to stop using your project, they want it to improve.

Of course there are also entitled and rude people. But we should not set the standards based on a-holes.

> not a pile of discouraging issue reports

This is such a strange way to look at software development. Discouraging?
What a weird future.

AI reduces the need for humans, AI then makes products for people to buy. Those people now don't have jobs to consume the products made by AI.

It's almost like we need a new economic system which guarantees a nice lifestyle even if you just don't want to work. And then if you want nicer things, like a bigger house you can be one of the lucky ones who can still find a job.

It's not to far off to say within 20 years driving/transportation will be completely automated. We'll have mail robots drop off packages. Robots building houses, etc.

I don't see a utopian no work future though. More like a dystopian high income disparity future
> only a dead Palestinian is a good dehumanized Palestinian, they are all the same.

Is that what you believe?

That's a pretty grotesque thing to say, even if it's not really clear what it means.

Instead of failed attempts to cast insults and innuendos why don't you actually address the discussion.

Admit that you made a grotesque comparison in an attempt to prove your moral superiority but instead got caught in your own hubris. Admit that you're making up quotes left and right so you can try to salvage some part of your argument, admit that you're putting words in other peoples mouths so you can build up strawmen to attack. Admit that every time you're shown you're wrong you refuse to even acknowledge it and instead start hurling insults as if that will make people forget the preposterous arguments you attempted. Admit that not once in this entire discussion did you approach it with even an ounce of curiosity, and instead assumed malice at every step. Then we can continue to have some sort of civil discussion, otherwise you're tilting at windmills and it makes you look foolish.

You've broken nearly every hn guideline for good discussion and continue to fume, it might be time to step back and step away for a bit.
Quiet asphalt is a thing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTV-wwszGw8
most of these proposals are downright ridiculous because they're couched in environmentalism but they act like nature will be totally fine to have a giant microwave laser or an artificial second moon.
You doubt that bug poster's "belief" that "most people want" that change?
AI helps me to make wine for younger drinkers
From a KeePassXC maintainer:

> In the lead up to this thread I received three reports of this new package method crippling people's workflow. One report was a user who couldn't open their database anymore because the yubikey feature was removed. Let that sink in for a second. People who lose access to their most important secrets can sometimes do irrational things in the moment of panic.

https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/issues/10725#iss...
And lots of great work in quantitative biology, which is hard to get funded elsewhere.
The feature flag is put there by upstream. If they don't want to support non-network installs then why do they even have that lever?

That said it probably makes more sense for Debian to package a `keepassxc-nonet` alongside the default `keepassxc` so end users can choose the variant.
I assume wifi or bluetooth is partly to blame here? How else does the app connect to the insulin pump?
I believe that it has actually dropped since 2000, with double-digit percentages of courses closing.
And tbh, Korean work culture seems to be horrible for overall productivity. Disclaimer: my only second hand knowledge are a Norwegian oil rig engineer and a French sailor (working on oil rigs. Weird, I know, one is extended family, second is happenstance).

But from what I've heard, they have trouble adapting to new data (they _can_ do it in real emergency, but actively avoid taking initiative), hide issues and overall are very rigid and show almost no improvisation skills, all of which is a problem in high stress, fast-changing environment like oil rigs.
This reminds me of a Windows 3.5 app called List (IIRC) that one day I lost the floppy to and as a 7 year old kid was completely lost without. So I installed bsd and broke my dads computer instead.
I don’t believe him on “not a search engine”.

Either:

OpenAI releases “updates” to GPT-4 and chatgpt to derail Google I/O’s announcements.

Or

OpenAI releases the search product after the Google I/O announcement as a surprise announcement.

Or likely both.

It’s obvious the goal is to massively steer attention away from Google’s announcement as they did before, so OpenAI may likely do two announcements, the second by surprise.

I don’t think they can be silent for this long and come back with just “updates”, they are definitely about to release a surprise.

Sam trying to say ‘not a search engine’ already means they know everyone knows they’ve been working on one and they are trying to not be predictable.
It's going to commit secrets inadvertently. That's a nonstarter.
> and that maintainer deal with all bug reports caused by their modified version.

I appreciate that it often doesn't happen, but that's supposed to be the default flow regardless: If you're using a distro-provided package and hit a bug, you're supposed to open a bug report against the distro package, and then the maintainer looks at it, and if the bug came from upstream then they file a bug with the upstream project. This is helpful because 1. the package maintainer is probably familiar with the package and can provide initial triage/analysis, possibly even being able to fix the bug outright before going upstream to share the fix, and 2. as you note, distro packages frequently carry some amount of patching and the maintainer should verify whether the bug is in their packaging or the upstream source code.

Unfortunately, many users default to reporting upstream first:( So in practice this is a concern, but it's really not supposed to be.
There is a common trope about this very effect: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/OnceOriginalNowC...
I love the terminal and use vim as my primary text editor but I can't remember the last time Mac OS full-screened an app for me unless I told it to. I drive most of my mac through keyboard shortcuts and minimal pointer interaction. Perhaps a mouse-first Mac users are forced into full-screen? That still doesn't sound right though.
I still have my Otis King helical slide rule I bought at 15!

I think that gives me some level of geek kudos
But thats not what the tweet says.

Building more city housing at higher density will draw young people into cities. High density causes low fertility.

Low cost in cities doesn't promote births in cities, which is what the tweet is arguing. That fertility isn't low because of high cost.
and nobody complained then, just as nobody should complain now, but unfortunately the world turned into this in the last couple of years.
> In practice by the time a frontline S-400 knows that there is something there, supersonic jets at cruising altitude already have too much kinetic energy to intercept.

The Swedish air force could routinely (16% of the time) get a fighter jet based missile lock on a frigging SR-71 in the 80s! 40 years later, altitude and speed do not help as much as you think. And radars are networked.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_SR-71_Blackbird
I didn't have either of those issues in my community, I'm sorry yours had those issues. In ours we formed bubbles, shared food, cooked meals together, and played an absolutely stunning volume of retro multiplayer games.
Covid was awful but I think I'll always fondly remember some of those nights.
You don't have to proactively read it. But when you notice your keepassxc doesn't work as it used to before, that should be a trigger for you to go back and read it, note that it tells you very clearly that the functionality you're missing is now in keepassxc-full, apt-install it, and go on with your life.
OpenAI doesn't have enough brand credibility to pull an Apple and try to arbitrarily redefine a foundational terminology.
I appreciate the history. If we want to discuss actual "inheritance" in a historical sense of the Classical civ and initial expanded civ originated in the Republic, rather than some type of lineal-political claim, than where the decentralized or otherwise Parliamentarian system of government again appears is the heir. Certainly, the HRE is the start of that in Europe. Prior, Frankish-Norman invader Kings sewed its seed in Britain. Today, its largest and historically most powerful manifestation is in the United States.
You're confusing 2 different things here. SBAS gets you (roughly) from 5m to 1m, to meet requirements for aviation use. RTK gets you from 5m to <0.1m. Both use base stations to monitor deviations, but for RTK the base station is intended to be <100km from you and the data needs to have as little delay as possible. SBAS base stations are a few per continent & don't care about delay to the same degree.
What happens when I’m allowed to view a column for some entities but not others?

In the real world authorization logic can get very complicated.

And who wants to migrate this kind of stuff once you’ve implemented it one way?

Honestly it’s best to keep your database doing what it does best: storing data.
Heat dissipation in space is hard.
In a real disaster, there won’t be any buying or selling
It looks to me to be a continuous replication backup solution masquerading as a DVCS. Combining them is problematic in the real world because of local noise others don't need to see and of inadvertently committing secrets and temporary large files. The storage and networking demands for this would be enormous.
Cloudflare does not have any bandwidth limits or request limits in any way. They generally do monitor high usage users on lower plans to try and upsell them to enterprise but you dont ever have to actually upgrade.

The reddit post you linked seems to not really have any content anymore, but I would be willing to bet they broke TOS given you are only really supposed to serve html content over CDN when on lower level plans when you are not using the developer platform to host the content such as videos/images/etc.

Fwiw though, if you are a business you probably should at the very least upgrade to business for the SLA and to create support tickets if needed.

edit: figured out why the article doesnt exist the OP removed it because it was an issue on his end not Cloudflares. (Using bot fight mode on a route supposed to be used by bots) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26072153
Insofar as traffic is concerned, any drop in IQ would be more likely related to PM2.5 pollution levels than noise:

https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/air-pol...
perhaps its because ORMs are considered bad by some people, so to them writing these GET API endpoints is very tiresome, having to always construct these complex filter queries by hand. From that vantage point it would make sense to move toward runtime database introspection, but then they realize that the API data model is different from the data layer so they introduce table views, and then they realize their permission system doesn't quite fit into this so they introduce row-level security, ...

I don't know why they want to write SQL so much, its a 50 year old language, it sucks ass :P
I certainly won't use that. It's not type safe, and doesn't even allow names for its pattern matching sugar. Why he calls this simple struct matching sugar via tagged unions "Algebraic Data Types" is beyond my understanding. He cannot even do nested structs nor unions.

datatype(
BinaryTree,
(Leaf, int),
(Node, BinaryTree *, int, BinaryTree *)
);

No names for the struct fields, so you need to rely on the position.

And then used:

int sum(const BinaryTree *tree) {
match(*tree) {
of(Leaf, x) return *x;
of(Node, lhs, x, rhs) return sum(*lhs) + *x + sum(*rhs);
}

// Invalid input (no such variant).
return -1;
}

Where lhs, x, rhs magically match the types defined above. What a nonsense design!
> It's not entirely clear what you are trying to say, but as a share of income earned, the rich earn 20% of the income, they pay 40% of the income taxes collected by the government. They objectively pay more than a fair share.

The question is what one defines as fair. For me, fairness is defined as "how much can one pay in relation to his income"... and then it's simple: when the secretary earning 48k a year has to pay 5% more in taxes, that's 2.4k less for her - and she'll feel that very immediately. Meanwhile, assuming Buffett has a yearly income of 480 million dollars (officially, he has a 100k/y salary, but there's no way his real income is that low given his net worth of ~130 billion dollars, so I just plugged in some number that is likely still way too low), if he has to pay 5% more taxes that's 24 million dollars - a sum that won't even register on any of his decisions.

Once you pass a certain amount of wealth and/or income, you just have/earn so much that any kind of tax increase or decrease will not make any material difference in your lifestyle.

Therefore, "fairness" for me would be defined as "all members of the economy, both the poor and the rich, contribute to society in a way so that both can live a reasonable life after taxes".
Government systems captured by the wealthy, tuned to serve the wealthy while we bicker over social issues (which are important) but also serve to distract from the people at the top screwing us all over so they can buy a Nth mega-yacht or vacation property.
That's the point. Why make the life easier for websites that display pop-ups. Pop-ups are pure evil.
A stirring ad that captures my lived experience.

They should do a follow-up with my friendships and family life.
Are you applying an embedding to titles on HN, comment full-text or something else?

When it comes to titles I have a model that gets an AUC around 0.62 predicting if an article will get >10 votes and a much better one (AUC 0.72 or so) that predicts if an article that got > 10 votes will get a comment/vote ratio > 0.5, which is roughly the median. Both of these are bag-of-words and didn't improve when using an embedding. If I go back to that problem I'm expecting to try some kind of stacking (e.g. there are enough New York Times articles submitted to HN that I can train a model just for NYT articles.)

Also I have heard the sentiment that "BERT is not an LLM" a lot from commenters on HN a lot but every expert source I've seen seems to treat BERT as an LLM. It is in this category in Wikipedia for instance

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Large_language_models

and

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-e&q=is+bert...

gives an affirmative answer in 8 cases out of 10, one of which denies it is a language model at all on a technicality that has since been overthrown.
What's the correct answer (and what was yours?)
Practice makes perfect. Highly recommend finding your local food not bombs cohort or visiting one in a nearby city and then starting your own back home.

Community resiliency is a natural instinct it seems. Rebecca solnit's "paradise built in hell" is a fascinating read on the subject.
Rook is the easy to operate version of Ceph. I would definitely consider it since it's far more mature.
I will eat anything that isn't in obvious danger of killing me but my wife comes from a family that treats dates as gospel, that (in accordance with FDA guidance) at events will get stressed about food being left out for more than an hour, etc. Those people exist, and in fact they are everywhere.
Maybe that is what you get when you replace social obligation with money and apps. That kind of existence was common in America and increased during covid. And it is a terrible model for situations where people actually need each other in a reciprocal way.
It’s good to know the limits AI systems. However this doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t develop self driving. Infrastructure is vulnerable, AI or no. You can attack the infrastructure, there is no counter other than a populous that mostly obeys the rules. People can go out and remove road signs, paint fake lines on the highway or coverup stop signs with plastics bags. Those would be crimes. Intentional interference with a self driving car would also be a crime. A certain amount of trust is required to make society work.
How are we ever gonna know if we can make AI safe from sending all the money in your bank account to a Russian hacker, unless we first give AI access to your bank account?
If you put up a big sign that says "potato" it's going to confuse both humans and computers, but that's not fooling vision in any way.

The type of issue in the article needs signs that seem to be working to humans, but are secretly failing. Not just "oh they put up too much in a single spot" or "there are two signs that contradict each other".
I dunno I thought it was well done. This is an entertaining trend on social media and they applied it to their product well.
Occam's razor. AGI isn't necessary to explain the observed behavior; a model that has no concept of truth or falsehood, but is just optimized to achieve goals will engage in this kind of behavior. If someone with the needed resources decides to train models with the goal of amassing wealth, those models, without any real intelligence and knowledge about the world other than text and a score representing current net worth, will come up with deceptive strategies, especially when it has the whole Internet to learn about possible strategies.
I am friends with a researcher at a drug and alcohol lab at a major state university. Obviously alcohol is bad but he's pretty clear: marijuana absolutely impairs. The functional difference is marijuana users will drive slower and be more cautious but they are still not 100%. He said if you gave drunk drivers more practice drunk driving they'd also improve! Not enough to make them safe however.

There's also the two different strains - they have an effect on why marijuana studies have conflicting results. The researchers source bad weed because the IRB has made it impossible.

I understand it all 'looks' solid but the sourced weed, the difficulty of finding quality participants before legalization, and the IRB has led to some interesting data. I think it will take more time, society is not there yet.

Alcohol studies get tons of funding, and have been studied for years and years. nearly 40ish? Weed didn't earnestly get looked at until the 2010s. Mushrooms have conflicting results according to him, and he's seen Kratom fail every study he's tried, and he tried a great deal to find some proof with that.
I'm already feeling that ChatGPT is becoming useless to me beyond the basic summarization and idea generation tasks, while only last year it felt like magic. Is this what it feels like to run on the hedonic treadmill?
You can make a pretty silent desktop (more space for heat pipes and large cooling blocks). But I had a Lenovo laptop that was recommended during a Linux excursion and it was loud as well, getting the M1 Air after that was bliss.
You might get good results if you are a good boy, or if it's your grandma's birthday

Any insider information about how they plan to compete with google ads / Adsense etc?
With cameras alone it seems pretty easy to trick them into dismissing road signs as nonexistent.. I think Lidar alone should be telling you there is a sign, so your camera is faulty or someone is putting up blank signs.

Lidar as I was told to use it would be in conjunction with a database of way points like signs, so the trouble would be knowing if the sign was updated.
The waiters' worry just needs to be addressed by, at the same time as banning tipping, a) removing the current loophole that allows hospitality staff to be paid less than minimum wage because tips will make up the difference and b) raising minimum wage anywhere that it's too low. It's crazy that instead of laws to prevent someone working full time as a waiter from being paid too little to live on they instead have to rely on customers not being too stingy and not tipping enough.

The fact that nobody in other countries wishes they had the US system should be a big clue as to how bad it is - no European waiter is thinking "I wish my salary were half what it is and customers were told their tips are what prevents me from starving". It really isn't a "some winners, some losers" situation it's just a shit situation.
Don't you face comparable problems with a dirty window as well?
How about a conductive space elevator? You could physically wire solar panels to the end.
The Transformers: The Movie soundtrack got me through this morning's workout. Highly recommended.
That's just absolutely untrue, humans are entirely capable of reading critically without internalizing. There are tons of liberal-minded Lovecraft fans, even though nearly all of his work is grounded in varying degrees of xenophobia.