skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
We really need a strategic transformer reserve. Maybe this could be done as a global international effort since so much commerce is on the line.
Yep. And also pay attention during package and system upgrades on some systems. In certain cases it messes up this ordering, and you end up with sshd starting before Wireguard again and then sshd doesn’t find any interface with the specified address, which in turn makes it so that it won’t bind to that address. Making the machine unreachable until you manually fix it again.
>People built freeways so they can live in car-dependent suburbs.

Lower replies which provide greater context to this statement.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40331409

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40335059
And as they say, two wrongs always makes right.
Presumably due to code maintenance issues, they couldn't ensure the installer script decompiler was secure. File extraction from NSIS is still there, just not installer script decompilation.
Is it already over?
That's extrapolating a lot from a low G5 storm. This wasn't a Carrington event. And storms can be worse than a Carrington event, even though that's unlikely.
I suppose it depends on precisely what you mean by "good". There are some very decent concurrent collectors that are very simple. The Chicken collector is fairly straightforward and real-time to boot, and seems to have only slightly lower throughput than concurrent MS:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220752316_A_study_o...
SoftBank's Arm plans to launch AI chips in 2025
Yes, they explicitly classify wikipedia as a tertiary source [1].

Wikipedia is good for finding secondary source, and then primary sources by following the links.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Primary_Secondary_an...
Take a look at https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html - Show HN is intended for things you've made others can try and so excludes most reading material such as curated lists.
Something like this refreshes quite quickly:

https://www.waveshare.com/2.9inch-e-paper-module.htm

You could definitely scroll text fast enough to read, even though it won't look very nice.
Hybrid cars is a good bet... They almost always use less fuel than the same model ICE, have a better emissions profile, and if they're plugin offer a lot of flexibility.

Adding solar panels when peak production is already too much can still make some sense, depending on circumstance. If it reduces long distance transmission by balancing use closer to generation, that's valuable. If it increases the length of time in a day where solar is dominant, that's valuable. If there's enough capacity that it makes sense to build export facilities, that's valuable, because it also brings import facilities and greater stability. If there's enough excess capacity to inspire storage facilities, that's good too.

Otoh, it could just be that the solar subsidies need to be turned off as they've done their job.
The very first paragraph of the Wikipedia article on entrepreneurship, plus some dictionaries, suggest that yes, it has, and not only that, but the usage in spaces like this one is still not the dominant one.

Unless you’re agreeing that the word still means what I suggest it does (or did), not just starting any kind of business.
If it's different in a way that is never more than rain, then how could it cause a problem?

It has to be more in some way for your argument to make logical sense.

Or was I unclear that I meant "more in some situations than rain ever is". If that's it, then sorry, my bad.
Behaving like a sheep won't change their behavior tho. What's the point of leaving only them the option to abuse?
If the tool runs in userspace and authenticates with a key stored in the user's home directory, isn't it authenticating the user? AIUI this isn't running a generic tunnel; it's shuffling packets inside the program and then putting WG UDP on the wire.
> "StarFire” receivers

Sounds accurate.
Yes, because meta programming in macros, makefiles, and embedding binary libraries or using git submodules is soo much more elegant.. yikes.
Stencils. Created to order, for a variety of notebook form factors. Grid columns, squares, dotted, and six (or more) heading sizes.

The limiting factor becomes writing small enough to fit actual verbiage on the page. It's not easy to make the notebook page "look like" the website.

A COBOL programming text has a section on mocking up the tabular layout. The content has to fit across an exact number of columns, but it's magic to see the spacing work out exactly right.

Pre-printed, legal-size (A4) perforated sheets, desktop on one side and responsive views on the back, might be neat. The grids are pre-printed but in faint lines, so we can sketch over the bones.
It's not less complex because it doesn't handle cycles, and naive ref counting performs much worse than naive tracing.
Yeah, I remember the Pixi (sp?) kickstarter, back in the heyday of ArduCopter. There was a brief period there where open-source, open-hardware, DIY got you the best results for multicopters.
Just skip breakfast to save money, quit buying avocado toast and Starbucks. Something something bootstraps something something lazy millennials
If you go with programming, have a look at this project I did for my own kids about your kids' age. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39704712
> the poster was simply asking a question and you replied with sarcasm.

They were not simply asking a question - in that case, they could've dropped the second part, which had exactly the same implication as my sarcastic reply.

Anyway...

> are you not worried that such efforts will further stigmatize autistic people as in need of a cure without ever actually offering one?

No, I'm not, because I don't see them as being mutually exclusive. We can do research to understand the causes of ASD and other neurodivergence - and hopefully eventually offer options for those of us who don't like to live with it - and still work toward destigmatizing it and making society less problematic for people like us. We've been doing that for decades at this point.

I would also note that you're only considering outward pressure on autistic individuals - that is, you're focusing on how difficult it is for us to live in society. But that is only one part of what autism is. Even if society were perfectly accepting of us and there were no obstacles at all in it, I'd still be overstimulated by the sound of rain, or have a meltdown because I can't get away from a smell, or... There are various "internal" symptoms that no amount of destigmatization will ever get rid of.

I'll also point out that, maybe the reason you don't encounter many autistic people who want to be "cured", is because people like you - who so strongly oppose such research - make us feel like traitors to our kind, and so we just shut up about it, and feel isolated even from the one community who we shouldn't feel isolated from.
I know that was a joke, but the reality is almost as creepy.

I worked for a corporation that drove marketing terminology to use their glossary, and saw the thinking firsthand. It's not paranoia. In fact, it makes perfect sense, and may not even be that underhanded. They submit huge reams of text, interspersed with their talking points, to any and all publications, news outlets, whatever. Some percentage of that gets published; sometimes, verbatim, and that reinforces the glossary.

The underhanded stuff, is when they start sneaking it into places that should normally not be "infected" by this behavior (like news organizations that accept corporate dogma as news articles, and put their own bylines on corporate fodder).

AI is gonna absolutely supercharge this.

I could already do this with ChatGPT, but that's kind of clunky and primitive. Custom LLMs will make it almost completely invisible and undetectable, and create an enormous tsunami of this junk.
I was a Java apologist for a long time and I still think you can write fine software in it (and the JVM is an incredible piece of engineering). But the fact that the class is the _only_ unit of abstraction is just so frustrating to me now (Yegge's Execution in the Kingdom of Nouns makes this criticism in a humorous allegory[1]). Modern Java does mitigate this somewhat. Lambdas provide nice sugar over the inline class-creation you'd have to do of yore. Records make it less of a pain to define POJOs. But I think this fundamental issue is at the root of much of the language's clunkiness.

[1] http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2006/03/execution-in-kingdom...
Are you saying people making 5 figures should not follow this advice?
Hi,

thanks for the honest and thoughtful discussion you are conducting here. Comments tend to be simplistic and it's great to see that you raise the bar by addressing criticism and questions in earnest!

That said, I think the fundamental problem of such tools is unsolvable: Out of all possible analytical designs, they create boring existing results at best, and wrong results (i.e. missing confounders, misunderstanding context ...) as the worst outcome. They also pollute science with harmful findings that lack meaning in the context of a field.

These issues have been well-known for about ten years and are explained excellently e.g in papers such as [1].

There is really one way to guard against bad science today, and that is true pre-registration. And that is something which LLMs fundamentally cannot do.

So while tools such as data-to-paper may be helpful, they can only be so in the context of pre-registered hypotheses where they follow a path pre-defined by humans before collecting data.

[1] http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/unpublished/p_...
perhaps you should reread the comment you considered snarky?
Agreed, I love the one large file approach.

:split
:vsplit

That said, I never use it because everyone else complains about it.
Not all solar storms are equally strong. Don't assume that because you're not hurt in a 10mph crash, you also won't be hurt in a 60mph crash.
To be clear, this is not exactly what I think (my thoughts tend to be a bit less mainstream I believe), but it is what seems apparent to me. I’ve not met a lot of people who dream of their children doing menial labor.
Not all of that capacity in the interconnection queues are ready to flip the switch though, correct? Requests can be pre-construction, construction, built/non-operating, and operating [1]

[1] https://www.enverus.com/blog/the-interconnection-queue-an-in...
Show HN: RemoteJobsly – a developer based job board
I built this for US-based freelancers and developers or executives.
>The submitted article was about "American colleges and universities", so we have to assume the US kind of exorbitant tuition

I know. My point was "EVEN assuming a fair charge, the costs for different degrees would STILL be similar (classrooms built and maintained, administrative salaries, campus maintenance, libraries, teacher salaries, etc)". So, why would you expect different degrees to charge different tuition?

>If college students didn't have to pay exorbitant tuition and take out massive student loans, we probably wouldn't even be having this discussion about ROI.

@lumb63 was bothered about how different degrees are paying the same - which is a question not tied to the tuition being exorbitant or not.

And I think his point was to use cost of the degree to discourage people from degrees that don't make money.
I think the idea is that you feed the LLM the article & the source material (from citations) and it checks if they match up.
I went back to study, took on an unpaid internship, and changed careers later in life. It was awesome and it seems to make a lot of people who stuck to their first career jealous. You may look down on men such as me, but most people appear not to do so.

I admit I don't know too much about the house-husband or the creative endeavor.
I don’t necessarily agree with this generalization. This appears to be specific to a region. Good 1st attempt
This seems to be totally incorrect as the constellations are completely unrecognizable.
Well, regular WG authenticates at the host level (roughly), not the user level, which can matter. I think this actually does auth at the user level, but there is some nuance there.
1. The scientific method is a way to rank all the available theories that has proven remarkably useful in practice. There is no presumption in the scientific method. It's the right way only because any other way is chaotic and doesn't lead to a single answer (shooting arrows in the dark).

2. To unseat the scientific method would require a method with even more usefulness and consistent and proven track record. There is no other such method.

3. Courts are responsible for application of human law (which is completely different from an exploration of what is true). Would you be able to determine the laws of gravity in a court of law? Does that even make sense?
Not the apps though. The packaging system yes, but whatever scripts run as part of the installation of a package is the package maintainer's responsibility. Not trusting your distro's package maintainers means you don't trust anything on your computer.
I believe that most black holes in the universe are primordial. Even most of the star sized ones. And definitely the supermassive ones.

But it would be super nice to find the ones with masses that are unexplainable in the current framework.
Fields are a set size and shape. They could probably accomplish this with location beacons at the corners of the field if GPS were disrupted long term.
I believe the kiddos refer to this as "trauma dumping".

The topic was programming. You switched it to horrific mutilation.

Don't do that.
I'm sorry, how come the level 3 system is only available in Germany and yet Mercedes gets to claim it as the first certified level 3 system available in US market? https://media.mbusa.com/releases/automated-driving-revolutio...
ArcGIS StoryMaps: Freeways and Freedom (2023)
Overview of Maritime Drones (USVs) of the Russo-Ukrainian War, 2022-24
This exactly. I would be much happier if the regulation was "don't use GPT-4 to decide when to kick Grandma out of the hospital" or "don't use a Llama finetune to make policing decisions", which is where I see the most certain need of regulation in the near future.
Wow, I have worked with the Enron corpus before and thought data extraction to this level of granularity was near impossible.

It's some truly gross data.

How long does it take to do something like ingest 1M emails with your system?
I didn't mean just GC. Automated memory management comes in many forms and can be pretty specific.

And it can be tailored too if a situation really deserves it. If I'm doing something custom I want the smallest amount of code to verify, just the special memory manager and not everything that uses it.
Graham has been appearing on Rogan’s podcast for years now. It’s Grahams exposure from Rogan that actually got Graham his Netflix show not the other way around.

In terms of proliferation of “pseudo archeology” - whatever that is - yes, lots of people are realizing they can profit from this, so more content than ever is being created to monetize the attention capture. It’s not unlike flat earth content that people have been able to successfully monetize.

It’s not all bad, Graham is no doubt responsible for getting people interested in history, archeology, and even geology. It’s really not societies fault they are ill equipped to exercise independent and critical thinking, much less the not having the skill sets, tools and resources to evaluate the existing archeological record.

Though for the people that want to make a career out of it, I’d rather see them obtain formal educations and contribute in meaningful ways in lieu of the majority of the grifting type social media content…most people probably have the capability to become educated about the actual science and they’d also learn pretty quickly there is no vast conspiracy to hide history/prehistory as much of the monetized social media promotes.
I don't look down on you, I consider myself a bit more egalitarian in my principles than that.

Is your notion then that you did not face social stigma? That would be an interesting counter-anecdote to what I said, may I ask where you live?
Without the passive DARPA funding in the beginning, Google would not exist.
I think the best art is done within constraints -- namely because it forces the artists to be creative within those constraints. Their creativity is what is inspiring.

When anything goes, you get splatters of paint on a canvas, which is much less interesting as it's much less creative. That, and the market forces as you said -- it's not creative, it's just signaling and marketing.

It's not high art, but what I admire about the original Star Wars film is that it was so difficult getting it made -- it took passion, talent, and craftsmanship to make a movie like that possible -- they had to literally invent new ways of doing things for that to be possible. Seeing the same kinds of movies today, where it's all done on computer -- requires less craft, less creativity -- and that's why these modern movies all feel uninspired.

Creativity within limits is where it is at.
I'm really amused by the concept of Quota becoming a site specifically and exclusively for question-answerers. Question-askers need not apply.

Where do the questions come from? Best not to ask.
You don’t do this in Rust. Up u can take a normal &T into something held by an Rc<T>. The count will not be touched.

It’s only when you need an additional owning reference that you call clone() and increment the count, or when one of the owners goes out of scope, and Drop decrements the count.

But for non-owning cases, which are many of them in most code, the count stays the same.
That's completely true, but if a company refuses to admit any mistakes or wrongdoing, then we get used to having to dissect all of its actions looking for secret malice, or at least incompetence. Every single change in a sizeable company is called "a new direction" and it's always up to us to figure out what this actually means. That's why we're afraid of changes.

I feel like our economy system misses a way to reward honest companies, and it resembles the Russian "we know they know we know they are lying, but we're still all excited about the new amazing opportunity".
What does this have to do with failing gps devices
And that's totally fine :). It's worth noting that as a derivative of the FSL/BSL in four calendar years everything will be released back to the community under the MPL-2.0.

The shell implementation is already under the MPL-2.0 and worth a look at for anyone who's interested https://github.com/noisysockets/shell
Currency Hedging and Principal Component Analysis
As we can see from the interconnection queue, gas-powered generation will continue to go up. It just isn't going to go up as fast as it has in the past, and that growth is thoroughly overshadowed by growth from solar and wind. If we want the transition to happen faster, we should execute on the existing queue with urgency.

Regarding the rest of the world, again, I'm not sufficiently well-educated to have a useful conversation. This article is about providing for US demand, not rest-of-the-world cleanliness. You do appear to be correct, however, that there's significant new coal going up at least in some places. India, for example, is building a lot of it and I'm not entirely sure why. China, by contrast, is building more than twice as much wind and solar as it is coal and is also taking oil and gas plants offline. https://ourworldindata.org/energy/country/china#how-much-is-...
Genomes of algae and plants illuminate signaling network evolution
How to win the Hermès game
Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging at 0.05 Tesla
"The lower-power machine was much cheaper to manufacture and operate, more comfortable and less noisy for patients, and the final images after computational processing were as clear and detailed as those obtained by the high-power devices currently used in the clinical setting."
Super Mario 64's unopenable door has been opened [video]
To be a little more helpful, I'll add that people DO take “quality of life” careers "without either inheriting or getting rich first".

Just ask your average gigging musician, writer, designer, and so on.

People who run "lifestyle" business and refuse to grow them outside a living income.

People who opted out of the rat race, from the start, or mid-career, and downsized, without being rich, to have more time with family, reduce stress, etc.
They make videos about drilling holes in rock using rocks and lots of time.
From what I can tell, Earth is not the POV.
So, in the report, the statement "the power of AI to perform complete _end-to-end_ scientific research" is a blatant lie. Given that your comment seems to be the most reasonable one, and considering that I've seen, over and over, that it's always the domain experts who are the least enthusiastic about AI byproducts, I recalled a saying from the Shogun series:

"Why is it that only those who have never fought in a battle are so eager to be in one?"
The assets built by workers continue to earn money for Google long after the asset builders have left. They should continue to have residuals for it - either in cash or in diluted shares.

That's all. If people get this, they'd be happy employees.
What if your guess is wrong though? What if running a planet where even the smart people are this bad at thinking is actually a gigantic risk?

Take climate change for example: have you seen any signs in these forum discussions of anyone with any novel thinking or even curiosity substantially beyond some variation of "trust the science/experts + democracy" on the matter? What if simplistic, faith based thinking like that is 50% underpowered, or even more?

And climate change is just one problem.
I've read it years ago - easily the best blog post ever created. Thanks for spreading the light.
A less finnicky approach would be binding to 0.0.0.0, then configuring incoming firewall policy. By default deny, then allow SSH through wireguard network. Or by default allow then deny SSH through public network.
Ideas and Execution Magic Chart (2011)
It will end with a giant meteor striking the earth?

Because of chat bots?

I'm not connecting the dots.

(Unless this is a general "in the long term survival rate for everyone drops to 0.")
Because WireGuard is a P2P protocol and if you want the server could be behind a NAT (eg. reverse shell). Very useful for accessing your home machine without having to open up a port etc. In the near future noisysockets will get NAT traversal support (with a Nebula lighthouse type server) which will make this use-case a lot simpler.