skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Fwiw that's what Devv.ai claims to do (in my summation from the Devv.ai announcement, at least). Regardless of how true the claims of Devv.ai are, their library versioning support seems very poor. At least for the one library i tested it on (Rust's Bevy).
I don’t know how to feel about this, when I get this error then I know I haven’t thought about a certain case that could happen and I should handle it.
Klotho
I tend to use redo (https://redo.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) for new projects. I find it particularly well suited for multi-step data processing workflows, where I might want to retrieve new data daily or hourly, or when I switch from one environment to another.
Just looks nice but isn't very prevalent yet. One of make's strengths is that it is everywhere.
Plugins!

My SaaS version of https://datasette.io is the open source version plus 76 plugins. Almost all of those plugins are themselves open source, with just a few that aren't for features that are unique to the SaaS product - things like showing how much disk space the user has used up already.

Here's what that custom plugin looks like, it's pretty thin: https://gist.github.com/simonw/114131fd9c1826f3629cc3b3dcb84...
when you're just hacking on stuff
‘Dancing’ raisins − a simple kitchen experiment
More context: This is related to today's release of the Spring Top 500 list (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40346788). Aurora rated 1,012.00 PetaFLOPS/second Rmax, and is in 2nd place, behind Frontier.

In the November 2023 list, Aurora was also in second place, with an Rmax of 585.34 PetaFLOPS/second.

See https://www.top500.org/system/180183/ for the specs on Aurora, and https://www.top500.org/system/180047/ for the specs on Frontier.

See https://www.top500.org/project/top500_description/ and https://www.top500.org/project/linpack/ for a description of Rmax and the LINPACK benchmark, by which supercomputers are generally ranked. The Top 500 list only includes supercomputers that are able to run the LINPACK benchmark, and where the owner is willing to publish the results.

The jump in Aurora's Rmax scope is explained by Aurora's difficult birth. https://morethanmoore.substack.com/p/5-years-late-only-2 (published when the November 2023 list came out) has a good explanation of what's been going on.
Yep, did the same thing with "Smoked Salmon". I went a step further and decided on this without speaking it about 2 months in advance so that I can get a clear baseline on ads I was getting.

On talking lovingly about smoked salmon, it took 2 days for it to turn up.

I have also seen it happen with folks talking about Jeep for instance.
Agreed, but I would consider https://planthardiness.ars.usda.gov/ to be much more easily consumed than the NPR article.

As another said, scrolling to do anything but move content up and down is a miserable experience for some people.
It's a neat demo but surprisingly laggy for a static webpage that has a minimalistic implementation of chess.
Better Markdown for Writers
Or maybe it's not a good enough story, and they know most people will not be shocked, and most people will not care, so it's a non story for most people.
I don't know, my experience is that it is very hard to tell if the model is better or worse with an update.

One day I will have an amazing session and the next it seems like it has been nerfed only to give better results than ever the next day. Wash, rinse , repeat and randomize that ordering.

So far, I would have not be able to tell the difference between 4 and 4o.

If this is the new 3.5 though then 5 will be worth the wait to say the least.
The new voice mode has not rolled out yet. It's rolling out to plus users in the next couple weeks.

Also it's possible this is trained on mostly speech.
I don’t doubt it. What can be more directive and natural than sex?
From the article

“Correction, May 13th: An earlier version of this article misstated which GPT Store features will be free. Free users can access custom GPTs, but they cannot create them.”
Can Suing People for Lying Save Democracy?
https://archive.ph/LhKek
It said "never incur request or bandwidth charges". I assume this means you don't pay to compute the response or for the bandwidth to deliver it.

Seems you could compute the response, store it somewhere (memcached or something), and then return an error. Then have the caller make another call to retrieve the response. (To associate the two requests, have the caller generate a UUID and pass it on both calls.)

That doesn't make it entirely free, but it reduces the compute cost of every request to just reading from a cache.

(This does sound like a good way to get banned or something else nasty, so it's definitely not a recommendation.)
Created my first HN account just to reply to this. I've had these same (very strong) concerns since ChatGPT launched, but haven't seen much discussion about it. Do you know of any articles/talks/etc. that get into this at all?
I've been using Turbo Pascal and it's derivatives since the 1990s.

Lazarus is cross platform and fast. The GUI tools are unmatched.
Works where archive.ph is blocked:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/suddenly-there-aren-t...

JSON-only, no cruft:

https://assets.msn.com/content/view/v2/Detail/en-in/BB1mhbxT
For PC games Commander Keen running on an EGA display was already enough for PC gaming to be good enough for me.

I remember how excited I was on my Atari 8-bit awaiting the production of Amiga Lorraine. By the time it came out I think I was less excited, and happy enough with my monochrome Atari ST. The Amiga would certainly have been more fun, but I was glad to have a machine that could run a (Megamax) C compiler. It helped that I got some beta software and dev docs through a connection. The Lorraine was supposed to have it all, graphics+sound+MIDI but the last part went to the ST instead.

It sure was weird when Commodore and Atari made PC-compatibles--the end of an era. In the late 80s I'd already moved past the Atari, Amiga, and even DOS/Windows, being all excited running all versions of OS/2 (until that failed too), but hey we got OS/2 3.0 (aka NT).
Those two public gathering photos seem utterly indistinguishable to me. Yes, one is a bit more zoomed in but they both have clearly identifiable people in them.

More broadly, I'm pretty sure many thousands, if not millions, of photos are shared every day on social media and in other forms that have clearly identifiable people in them. The vast vast majority of which the subject is blissfully unaware.

I haven't actually spent a lot of time in Germany specifically--relatively speaking. But I'm sure I have a very great many photos online that violate one or more of these rules.
Why did everyone talk about openAi releasing a search engine?
I'm pretty sure models are at their end game already. Now the law of diminishing returns is at play.
On target to be somewhat slower than Frontier at double the power consumption.
In my opinion the Linux kernel is the gold standard for makefile use (they call it kbuild).

It solves the cflags-changed problem by writing out the command used to build and updating it in the filesystem only if it has been changed (see "if_changed").

It has some external (to make) dependencies (a c program and numerous shell scripts) to make it work but it's great and can be relied upon!

It wouldn't be that crazy to get content-based dependencies working, especially looking at kbuild as an example.
Do you call bazel from dagger or what? You still need a build runner, no?
So every day we're going to get post about new x.y.z LLM?
> The second paragraph addresses what I believe to be the specific mechanics driving our current popular flawed implementations of these tools.

I don't agree with your assessment. I think there are fundamental problems with these tools not caused by "monopolists" or "dark patterns." One that easily comes to mind is the dysfunction that comes from people being separated from in-personal social feedback and other kinds of regulatory practices.
Apple Podcasts link FWIW:

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/these-companies-say-th...
No, that is not the kind of equality this discussion is about.

In this case, we are asking whether two hypothetical people who are completely identical in every way except for their genitals will receive the same opportunities, rewards, and treatment from their employers and their peers.

It is not for public policy to speculate on which parent will produce more value for the baby or the household by staying at home. The point you were responding to originally was this: If you mandate more parental leave for women than for men, you end up creating an incentive for employers to hire men instead of women (or choose to let women go when layoffs come around), because their benefits cost less.

That is the type of gender inequality we are talking about, and I hope you will agree that fixing it is not a "false goal".
GPT-4o Benchmark Results
Of course this is how they do it. They trick you into installing software for one purpose, and install other shit along with it. This is how spyware has worked for the last 30 years. Did anybody actually go out and install Bonzai Buddy or all those fucking toolbars in IE? Of course not!
I agree iPadOS is not the OS for those changes. What I'd really like is to run macOS on the iPad.
It's from Japanese, a wasei kango (和製漢語) formation using on-readings of Chinese characters: 絵 (e, "picture") + 文字 (moji, "script"). The 字 (read ji) is the same as in 漢字 (kanji, "Han characters") and ローマ字 (rōmaji, "Roman characters". Exactly parallel to a neo-Latin / neo-Greek formation like "pictograph" (Latin pictūra, "picture" + Greek γράφω / graphō, "write, draw").

漢字 itself originates from Chinese, where it is pronounced hànzì in Mandarin and hon3 zi6 in Cantonese. It is also used in Korean, where it is pronounced hanja.

In Chinese, 絵文字 is orthographically borrowed as 繪文字 (traditional) / 绘文字 (simplified) — 繪, 絵 and 绘 all being alternate renderings of the same character. It is pronounced huìwénzì in Mandarin and kui2 man4 zi6 in Cantonese, according to the etymology of its constituent characters. In Korean it is borrowed phonetically as 이모지, imoji.
I tried to build this on an early gen RPI 4 about three years ago- but ran in to limitations in the hardware (and in my own knowledge). Super cool to see it happening now!
There are no shovels or shovel sellers. It’s heavily accredited investors with millions of dollars buying in. It’s way above our pay grade, our pleb sayings don’t apply.
Oh, I meant the actual ChatGPT service, not just something powered by GPT-4 or 3.5.

I've found Microsoft Copilot to be somewhat irritating to work with – I can't really put my finger on it, but it seems to be resorting to Bing search and/or the use of emoji in its replies a bit too much.
The link is Intel's own website. Has excellent quotes on it like:

> Why It Matters: Designed as an AI-centric system from its inception

Announcement was in 2015. I'm curious whether Argonne are pleased with it.
Google is the scourge.
You can do this with soil heating cables and plant frost covers.

Our problem during winter storm Uri is that the Texas electrical grid almost failed and we had to power for nearly a week in subfreezing temps.
I would prefer a more plausible guess
These are bubbling to the top due to high interest. When the interest subsides so will the posts. Are we fascinated by the wrong things?
Julia has to bootstrap an ecosystem. If mojo can borrow all of the successful Python libraries, that is worth a lot.

Still an enormous uphill battle, but slightly more tractable. Regardless, it is a rough place to be - for a staggering number of uses, Python is fast enough. The organizations who absolutely require top tier performance already have the ability to use FFI. Instagram runs on Django and I believe is still used for YouTube.
Reminds me of this Reddit post of using A* on a real map: https://old.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/172b8as/oc...

Unfortunately I don't think the Redditor shared their code.
On the other side we're killing whole forest ecosystems under the pretense trees can be replanted, plus the monoculture effects.

It's complicated.
frink was clearly the default nerd character
You might like Gary's blog on potential AI harms: https://garymarcus.substack.com/
As someone that duct-tapes hidden AirTags in my luggage (replacing former use of Tile, but AirTags have a bigger network and I use an iPhone) this is not good news for me. I have close to a 0% concern about stalkers, and I have a significant concern about thievery while traveling. I have an AirTag in my luggage, on my keychain, in my wallet, and in various other places /specifically/ to ensure that while traveling I can recover my belongings and deter thievery. This just ruined all of that.
It's also possible that materials science (and others) were too immature and could not be rushed without innovations in a million other areas. The tradeoffs needed across all fields may be worse for society, or just impossible until the global population could produce enough skilled workers.
Oh, so you mean it might just be power (or other metal) lines causing fires indirectly?

I'd be very surprised if anything naturally occurring in a forest would be long and/or conductive enough to be a problem even during very strong geomagnetic storms.
It doesn't help any that currently "F-16 Strike Eagle II reverse engineering" <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40347662> is also on the front page, "priming" one to think similarly
When you're making a project just like the linked one.
> List of US Presidents with their ages at inauguration

That’s what the python script had at the top. I guess I don’t know why you didn’t ask that in the first place.

Edit: you’re not the same person who originally posted the comment I responded to, and I think I came off a bit too harshly here in text, but don’t mean any offense.

It was a good idea to ask to see the code. It was much more to the point and clear what question the LLM perceived you asking of it.

The second example about buckets was interesting. I guess LLMs help with coding if you know enough of of the problem and what a reasonable answer looks like, but you don’t know what you don’t know. LLMs are useful because you can just ask why things may not work or don’t work in any given context or generally speaking or in a completely open ended way that is often hard to explain or articulate for non-experts, making troubleshooting difficult as you might not even know how to search for solutions.

You might appreciate this link if you’re not familiar with it:

https://buckets.grayhatwarfare.com/
16K is what a wealthy person spends on his first class tickets to get to his vacation!
Not OP, but having a favicon—any favicon, really—during prototyping helps me get a feel for my project's identity, and, more pragmatically, gets rid of incessant 404s.
There is probably a simple answer to this question, but why isn't it possible to use a decentralized architecture like in crypto mining to train models?
I'm the same. I've used a lot of build systems over the years and they all get complicated fast. And they always have "spooky action at a distance". I prefer the simplicity and expliteness of makefiles.

Every time I've setup makefiles for projects someone always comes in and tries to make determining of dependencies happen before building rather than "determining dependencies as we build for the next build", which is just as robust. I don't know why software engineers always don't like that haha.
Another ideal candidate for the Google graveyard ;-)

https://killedbygoogle.com

https://gcemetery.co
Travel Without a Phone (2019)
“Kind of”?
It’s pretty clear 25 years in Google is a one trick pony: they make money selling targeted ads and that’s about it.

Now, you could argue in favor that Cloud makes some revenue beyond ads; but are a third tier offering that is only there because ads cash was tossed into a furnace. They are “profitable” now, but there’s no way they’ve made back the money they burned and they won’t for a while.

None of the robotics teams at Google with ever produce anything useful in the market and are pretty much on the chopping block as it is.
I'm saying we have imported far more family docs than needed to keep the ratios the same. That without immigration we'd have an even greater shortage of family docs than we do now.
As others have pointed out, no, not without access to the Airtag. That said you can make it beep which will cause the owner some surprise/confusion.
Indeed, it seems the author chose to separate behavior of the "user/creator" from aesthetic for the purpose of this argument. Which could be perhaps due to the author trying to separate their own ego from these sort of trueisms that they perceive to be inherent constructs that all structures/objects contain. However, it seems we can see their ego still in their use of the word "spectator", which I would argue is how the author has placed themselves.

Where I think they were going with this I'll explain in an example. If you take an urban city, the centers are the buildings, the shops, businesses, etc, where meaning and behavior has been centered and distributed across a grid of streets. The streets would represent the lowest hierarchy, as on the streets its anarchy of meaning wherein the occupants of the street bear little collective purpose. But once you enter a store, suddenly there is a unified purpose seen in the design of the store and the behavior of it's occupants that mutually reinforce each other. Such that these hierarchies are easily distinguishable(their attraction). To be attracted to something one must first define the boundaries of the object, one is attracted to a collection of behaviors or manifestations of nature that they construct as an object.
WWDC may reveal a new momentum. Or they might reveal exciting new sticker packs for Messages.app
Off topic but "Break the ___ barrier" has got to be my least favorite expression that PR people love. It's a "tell" that an article was written as meaningless pop science fluff instead of anything serious. The sound barrier is a real physical phenomenon. This is not. There's no barrier! Nothing was broken!
But in this case you're not talking with a real person. Instinctively, I dislike a robot that pretends to be a real human being.
That's my guess.
Even if the tracker didn’t alert the thief, how hard is it for a thief to find a tracker on the bike on their own? I don’t think an AirTag is going to save too many bicycles.

Seems like the calculus would only make sense when you are talking about big expensive items - cars, boats, RVs. But for those you probably want a non-bluetooth solution.
I’m not saying anti-nuclear as a slander, but that’s clearly their position. Given their resume, I believe they came by it honestly, via years of experience and study. I don’t think I’m besmirching them by saying they’re anti-nuclear, and I think given the tenor of the article, they’d agree with me.

It is, however, something to be aware of when reading an article they wrote: they are not a fully disinterested observer, they have a pre-existing belief about nuclear, and their arguments for this article agree with those beliefs. That’s a thing to be aware of when one evaluates the set of facts they’ve chosen to present.
Why does Picard always have to specify temperature preference for his Earl Gray tea? Shouldn’t the super smart AI have learned his preference by now?
Except that Amazon explicitly says they don't do this, and they have extremely strong financial incentives to not lie about this: https://www.amazon.com/b?ie=UTF8&node=23608571011#:~:text=Ec....

To emphasize, I'm not saying Amazon doesn't do this out of the goodness of their hearts. I'm saying they don't do this because, from a purely financial perspective, it makes no sense for them to do it.
In addition to that, it's the WWDC/GoogleIO season. Which might have an effect on announcement schedule of others as well.
It's hard to appreciate how much we take for granted the things we are accustomed to.
I maintain hope for Waymo. But the longer they wait for perfection, the more likely that someone less cautious will win using cheaper sensors and better AI.
As in the title of the linked article, the earliest emoji are not from 1999, or 1997, but from 1988. I know, because I'm the guy that discovered them.

But, yes, they're emoji because they were created and named in Japan. The IBM set serves a different purpose and exists in a different context. But, they are both living happily alongside each other in Unicode.
Can OpenAI change your thermostat?
This is not true at all. I'm active in multiple NSFW AI Discords and Subreddits, and looking at the type of material people engage with, almost all of it is very clearly targeted at heterosexual men. I'm not even aware of any online communities that would have NSFW AI stuff targeting mainly female audience.
Just a few jabs at your opening paragraph.

We can simultaneously have "too many people" and be on the verge of decline. We aren't there yet. Most countries are still growing, just at a decelerating rate.

And the reason isn't a Children of Men biological fertility collapse. We've spent 60 years telling women to get jobs, everyone to defer employment for higher education and housing age childcare are both the most scarce and expensive they've ever been. This isn't a mystery collapse. It's money. Always has been.
Or they simply disagree.
I have been close to people in that kind of situation and I am happy to answer.

We tend to see those questions from the nightmarish movie plot perspective in which someone is wrongfully institutionalized. Cuckcoo's Nest and all that.

Also many families want to have their mentally ill members with them. With proper medication they can live a happy life.

But there are terrible situations when they don't take the medication or there's an addiction problem.

There's very little nuance in these cases, really.
I took a closer look, and it looks like the compression doesn't depend on the seed at all. This makes it look like any collision is a collision on all seeds.

pub(crate) unsafe fn gxhash(input: &[u8], seed: State) -> State {
finalize(aes_encrypt(compress_all(input), seed))
}

For a hash table, you would normally use just the low bits to select a bucket, so this still protects you from collisions on just a subset of the bits, but if you can produce a large number of collisions on the exact 128-bit output, then it's not DOS-resistant.
In other words, the intimate data doesn't stay on the device, and the user must trust the company that is grabbing the data.

Regarding trust, the must trust the company to not misuse the data now, must trust that future version of the company (and asset acquirers) not to misuse the data, must trust the company to perfectly secure the data against intruders.

(The talk of encryption and anonymization is usually mostly a diversion or misunderstanding.)
>Announcement was in 2015. I'm curious whether Argonne are pleased with it.

All I'll say is that you can probably guess how they feel about it given the context.
Yes, it is. Percentages don't mean anything in temperature unless it is Kelvin where 0 is truly 0.

1 to 4 degrees Celsius is not a 300% increase in anything but the integer representing temp. Try that in Fahrenheit or with a negative value.

Edit: I think I initially missed your point that percentages are kind of silly to use anyway.
a german comedian said this: there is no point to raise children properly, they will just copy their parents anyways
I've been writing scripts like this but with a case/esac at the bottom to map $1 to the right command. Have never thought about doing this instead. thank you for opening my eyes!
I fear government actors will work hand in glove with companies like OpenAI to limit that competition and curtail non-corporate-safe AI.
So we, as a society, invented keys and locks not because there are thieves but thieves came later, because we first invented keys and locks?

Inventing, together, keys and locks was an "intent to mistrust" and, hence, created evil?

Yeah. But no.
The point of Stallmanites is to chase the rabbit, not catch it.