skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's kind of what I'm getting at. I don't support either side because both are wrong. Stopping the suffering means compromise and concessions on both sides. The best the world can do is make that clear and not get caught up protesting for one side or the other - again, both are wrong. Their current path will only lead to another 100 years of suffering.
I think you can. I mean the Daily Stormer amongst other horrible hate-filled online publications are allowed to publish online, and US citizens are allowed to read it.

Meanwhile Israeli citizens cannot read Al Jazeera legally now.
Ask HN: Why not use old smartphones as a "Raspberry Pi"?
Anyone doing it?

How hard is it to get Linux onto an iPhone?

What are some caveats - as somebody who uses a Raspberry Pi as a home server for many apps and has thought about expanding, what should I know about using a smart device for a server?
Is this an argument against strongly typed identifiers, or just an argument against adding too much meaning to the identifier?

I think if the identifier just adds what type of data it is identifying, the extra meaning will only become obsolete at the same time that data does. And the extra type information can help avoid/debug problems where the wrong type of id was used.

Compare with strongly typed ids/type branding:

- https://hw.leftium.com/#/item/39174998

- https://www.peakscale.com/strongly-typed-ids/

- https://andrewlock.net/using-strongly-typed-entity-ids-to-av...
The car was supposed to pivot, but yeetet right through, taking it for a ride. Probably ending up causing enough damage to change the winnder of the race.
It's entirely possible someone is cycling and has reduced vision (sunset, evening time, sun in your eyes, etc.) or isn't 100% focused for a few seconds (while thinking about something else). Putting any physical obstacle in the middle of a path is a very odd and dangerous choice.
I initially read this as "... local AI ..." and was somewhat confused.
The Guardian is known for having such different takes on transgender rights in their US and British editions that the US employees complained.
Not in America, but I was talking to some managers for a childcare service here and they were explaining why they try to favor brown people. One put it as "for want of a better measure". It's kind of strange since that's sort of what all racism is, isn't it? An easy shortcut for evaluating people without having to go to the trouble of investigating each individual.
nah, its already getting reviews flipped.

It'll come back.
> Should Qatar refuse to host US?

America is (a) a country and (b) major trading and security partner.

> Qatar is not a western country, there is no reason to expect it to buy into western exceptionalism

We are their security guarantor. It’s why Doha is publicly debating shutting down Hamas’ political office.
There's gradations of good.

I'd argue that we're at bad now, and specifically worse than even 20 years ago, itself worse than 20 years before that.

The pillaging of journalism funding, by Google and Facebook for ad revenue, substituted with "I dunno, the Internet will figure something out" isn't one of our better moments as a culture.
This is a very very high quality piece of writing, one that will withstand the test of time. It is so hard to say anything powerful and relevant to the ongoing conflict without accidentally landing on one side of it, and this essay perfectly threads the needle. A couple things stood out to me:

> For several years now, many people have been protesting the economic and political machinery that perpetuates climate change, by blocking roads, throwing paint, interrupting plays, and committing many other arrestable offenses that can appear ridiculous to skeptics (or, at the very least, performative), but which in truth represent a level of personal sacrifice unimaginable to many of us.

I think this is an important point to remember. Many times, extreme protests are labeled as “attention-seeking”. Well yes, that is the point - but not attention for the protester - attention to the issue. Imagine an issue affecting you so strongly that you are willing to be arrested to draw attention to it. Given the level of sacrifice it requires, it’s almost impossible to fake that level of conviction. But this is also why it’s met with ridicule - many people can’t fathom having that level of devotion to a cause outside of themselves - and many people respond to things they don’t understand with ridicule.

> To send the police in to arrest young people peacefully insisting upon a ceasefire represents a moral injury to us all. To do it with violence is a scandal. How could they do less than protest, in this moment? They are putting their own bodies into the machine. They deserve our support and praise. As to which postwar political arrangement any of these students may favor, and on what basis they favor it—that is all an argument for the day after a ceasefire.

Well said. I am especially annoyed by people whose reaction to protests is to immediately attack the practicality of their specific demands. In most cases, protesters just want something to stop. It’s not about actionable demands, at least initially. And asking for “actionable” demands is in and of itself an attempt to reimpose the power structures of the very system the protesters are protesting. It’s like, “oh you’re saying our system is broken and is resulting in catastrophic outcomes? Let’s talk about how we can work within that system to address your concerns.”
I have found Deepgram to be good.
planet-today.com (the source) is a right wing conspiracy website, that get most international traffic from russia (https://www.semrush.com/website/planet-today.com/overview/).
The domain is also registred in Lituania (https://urlscan.io/domain/planet-today.com) like most russian propaganda websites.
The website is also posting live data on the Schumann Resonance (https://www.planet-today.com/p/schumann-resonance-today-247-...) and this link is heavily featured on the homepage. This is esoteric pseudoscience heavily used in the qanon context.
And on top of these graphs (I sh*t you not) it says: The graph is updated every 15 minutes. Local time is expressed in Tomsk (Russia) Summer Time (TLDV). TLDV = UTC + -- hours.
What a weird choice of local time for a US news publication.
Related:

Helldivers 2 Removed from Purchase on Steam in over 150 Countries

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40263289
Not at the moment, though there does seem to be a bit of chatter about joining from the pols.

But as a half hearted member due to the nuclear issue, and historically a bit of a weak link in the Five Eyes, ITAR privileges are likely not on the cards.
Tiemann released his compiler in Dec 1987, labeling it a beta release. ZTC++ came out in April 88, and was a shrink-wrapped commercial product. I obviously passed ZTC++ around to friends and associates before it was released, but didn't keep any records of that. That was in the days of mailing floppy disks around.

It comes down to whether you consider a beta a release or not.

I don't know if Mike Tiemann wrote his own code generator or not. ZTC++ was written entirely by myself, from preprocesser to object file.
It isn't needed. Teams could develop complex web applications before React existed and they can still do so.

If the developers have experience with other languages and native UI frameworks then they probably won't want to use any of the Javascript frameworks when developing a web application as they already have a mental model for how to setup the structure of function callbacks for handling user interactions and state changes.
> that's all the parent was saying

Nuh uh. jimbokun intensified it by a huge amount with those "every" terms and saying "must" and "exactly", describing a mandate that is very stupid and ignorant of statistics in a way that rebeccaskinner's description is not very stupid and ignorant of statistics. Also,

> race quotas

The post you're replying to says "further investigation", not "race quotas".
Israel is a country which values demography over democracy, so, like other Arab countries which don't value democracy, press repression is going to be a foregone conclusion
(Disclaimer: never played Hell divers 2, not a shooter fan, and I have had PSN since near the beginning)

I'm surprised they cancelled it. Sony finally had their popular GaaS, one that released under their helm, and it seemed to be their big portal into getting more sign-ups from a platform they were starting to experiment with. I guess they didn't want to risk the PR hit in this tumultuous year, especially after having to layoff so much talent not even a few months ago.

That said, I'll still make my hot take here and say how I hate how gamers will praise review systems to help organically inform each other if products, but then abuse it (and likely bot it) whenever any slight inconvenience makes it way in here. Review bombs are a tool that get weaker the more it is utilized, and we've already seen them being used previously to protest political decisions tangentially attached to the game. Or even review bomb unrelated games who simply have the same publisher.

The tumultuous user review system with little oversight makes me understand why Epic was hesitant to put that into their storefront roadmap for years, and why Sony/Nintendo (AFAIK) don't make it easy to change your reviews retroactively.
UK government has commented on this in a bit of a non-answer compared to other petitions: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/659071. However, it seems like there is legislation around intentionally omitting material information at the time of sale where there are plans to break or worsen the quality of a game later. It is prohibited by UK law.

There is now a movement called “Stop Killing Games” which seeks to clarify what the laws are for these sorts of scenarios worldwide, and to establish at least a weak precedent for a publisher being penalized for such behaviour.
Any citations? Reporting what Hamas says doesn't make it a Hamas mouthpiece, btw.
I think your usage is actually more like definition 3.
It's got to be Raymmar Tirado's "7 Reasons Why You'll Never Do Anything Amazing With Your Life"

https://medium.com/raymmars-reads/7-reasons-why-you-will-nev...
And my father-in-law is still upset about it.

It's led to some interesting outcomes - for example, I've seen people write "Princess Highway" a fair few times, presumably on account of the official spelling ("Princes") falling confusingly somewhere half-way between the more usual "Prince's" and "Princess".

In day to day use, I don't think most people actually use the apostrophe-free official spellings, at least for names comprised of ordinary English words (Prince's Hwy, Surfer's Paradise), but it might be more of a free-for-all with proper names (Wiseman's Ferry or Wisemans Ferry).
I could perfectly hear in my head Jeremy Irons delivering those lines. What a fantastic scene.
If you add together the expenditure (or revenue) of all companies the sum will greatly exceed GDP.
I think the decision here was bad or more than a bad decision. From what I read, this was always the plan, but the overloaded servers at launch had them remove authentication to more quickly ramp up to the unexpected player count.

If this was all settled at launch, it wouldn't be any worse than a blizzard or Ubisoft release, which do requires their respective accounts.
I'm seeing 82% of recent reviews being negative on Steam.
> The costs would be impossibly high and we'd probably have to do away with driving as a mode of transport

Now you’re thinking in portals
One takeaway could be that sending people to the moon wasn't as hard as we like to think it is.
If not for the other half HN would be a very different place.
It is not controversial here, but I don't think it have been thought thoroughly here.

You are asking for legislation forbidding hostile (or unexpected) updates.

But how about exemption for (or even mandating) "good" (e.g. security) updates? We all know that the botnet from IoT device is a real problem.

What about the nuisance from the "security best practice"? Like, disabling SSL1.0 for the best of security and break compatibility?
My friend had a folder of photos of peoples laps they all accidentally took when they first handled the phone.
That's what the Bomba [0][1] was about. The Brits worked off those developments and continued the work that the Poles had started but were unable to continue themselves because of the "deteriorating political situation".

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bomba_(cryptography)

[1] https://www.bcs.org/articles-opinion-and-research/the-enigma...
I've seen much worse campaigns that did not cause change that still ended up being fine in the end. Especially for entertainment, most people just want to go in and do their thing, not be a part of a long term protest/strike on a company.
Thank you for sharing this. It was incredibly beautiful.
Hi: I'm one of the authors of the OpenDAC paper. Our Github repo has been going through significant restructuring and it looks like the files were moved after the press release went out. Here are the updated links:

- https://open-catalyst-project.github.io/ocp/core/datasets/od...

- https://open-catalyst-project.github.io/ocp/core/models.html...

We'll update the links in the release ASAP.
-AS
> Binyamin

This one is really interesting. I note that you don't list the counterpart at all, but here's a selection from Weavers, Scribes, and Kings:

> In Syria in the early second millennium BCE, Amorite-speaking people grew up knowing if they belonged to the Banu-Yamina ("sons of the right" or "sons of the south") or the Banu-Sim'al ("sons of the left" or "sons of the north").

Benjamin is the only name I know of to memorialize an ethnic conflict that was apparently won long, long ago, so long ago that most people with an active interest in the time period have no idea it existed.

As far as your question goes, just the form of your answer is pretty good at reinforcing the point of my question.
You'd be better off switching to a non-linux system on that hardware. Ideally something that uses 64bit offsets and time_t.
So next the attackers playing the long game will just set out to develop the next great everybody-uses-it open-source library, so they control it from inception?

Great that we'll finally get state-sponsored open-source development :D
Sweden operate Vision Zero with exactly this goal and the Netherlands also have a great record here, showing it’s possible if you actually try.
termux would get you most of the way there but will it auto start on boot, will it run continuously and all that? i am not sure
Taiwan lacks young passionate workers in semiconductor industry
> Using copyrighted content for commercial purposes should be a violation

so reading a book and using the book contents to help you in your job would be a violation too based on your logic
I worked on that briefly as my first real job. It was totally a side show for Nokia. They (=every layer below the highest) didn't seem to give a fuck about how it goes and quite possibly actively tried to damage the project.

I think this was a massive leadership failure.

It destroyed Finland's economy in a way which it hasn't still properly recovered from. It was made worse by those managers moving to other companies after the crash, bringing their so-called culture with them.
There should be no "for a while" here. People did not buy the game with that requirement, so it can't rightfully be added later.
> Usually you can use your own seeds from your production for your next batch.

I'm sorry, that is simply not true. Yes, there are so-called "heirloom" varieties that come true from seed, but commercial farming in the United States has been relying on hybrid seed for well over a hundred years now, and hybrids in general do not come true from seed.

Seed production is a highly specialized form of farming.

No large-scale farmer saves seed for replanting.
Who would have such ideas that worsen the product to extract more profits in a capitalist system? A true miracle..

Cynicism aside, that record has been played a thousand times. There is a certain manegerial class who are unable to create anything of lasting value themselves, so they fooled themselves into believing that the destructive skill of milking money out of good things until they are broken is somehow a merit.

The value they create is always based on exhausting external resources, be it the environment, safety culture or brand trust. The good kind of business person would be able to take a thing and make money while creating value that lasts for society, employees and the company alike. Those have become rare however.
Woohoo, we effected about the least possibly impactful change imaginable!
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion statments (DEI)

For those previously blissfully ignorant; such as me.
> especially after having to layoff so much talent not even a few months ago.

Excuse me, this is a sincere question, as I am not too familiar with Sony's numbers.

Why did they have to? Did they write red numbers?
You haven't actually described any differences between the terms. (Well, you did claim one, that "motte-and-bailey is more specific", but combined with your appeal to "actual usage", that is clearly untrue.)
would you still keep a uniqueness constraint on the uuid/ulid column?
I was referring to the "we pay our respects to the elders" part as glorifying.
It only takes about 2 seconds. Ask me how I know.
In that situation my country would probably be an option so I wouldn’t be choosing between UK or USA…
> I don’t really know how to navigate this problem to be honest.

Realistically, you can't, other than finding people who can accept that reality is shades of grey, not "my team good, other team bad."
On first reading your comment makes a lot of sense, and is certainly logical for maximizing the common good.

But unfortunately, companies simply don't work the way you are proposing.

The short reason is this "good citizenship is indistinguishable from corruption. Therefore good company governance leans away from both."

The somewhat longer answer is that while a "company" might have a lot of money, or might make a lot of money leveraging some common good, it is not (usually) one person's money.

The bigger the company the harder it gets to actually -spend- the money. There are procurement departments, various sign-offs and so on. First and foremost it helps if there is a tangible (defendable) reason to spend the money.

Yes, companies "give" money away. Usually under the guise of marketing. It's easy to donate money to the local cancer center. It's harder to explain the marketing value of supporting random open source projects.

For tech companies it's -somewhat- easier, but even then it's simpler to donate time rather than money.

I've said it a lot lately, but OSS development has to "commercialize" if it wants to be commercial. That means first understanding "what companies pay for" and designing products to fit that.

Or target individuals with excess cash of their own that they're willing to just "pass along".
Maybe try again? I saw it many times as a child and rewatch it every few years.

Feels more prescient every time.

Still, options will differ.
> Imagine a world where you just had drawing and input handling primitives on the web.

Good news! We do have those primitives! The canvas element can - and is - used for drawing, and input events are fairly easy to manage. Larger projects like Google Docs or Figma often go in this direction, because for very complicated applications, it's useful to be able to handle every part of the rendering process yourself.

That said, it turns out having a rich selection of easily-debuggable, accessible components attached to a powerful layout engine is also really useful, hence why people mostly stick to the DOM unless they specifically need something that only canvas can offer.
You're giving a ton of weasel words here: most likely (but not certainly). All that word salad of wishy washy makes it clear that the fog of war is still present regarding those events.
There was no actual deception, though.
We _cannot_ get our office 365 environment to consistently use the correct locale. It’s shockingly frustrating to find yet another place that uses U.S. date format and spelling.
No strings attached… except the lack of an airport (Israel destroyed it in 2001), a sea blockade, tightly controlled land border crossings and periodic attacks on Gaza power and water facilities. You only need to look at the past six months to see that Israel is not “supplying” Gaza with water and electricity out of the goodness of their hearts.

While you’re looking at the last six months, perhaps also look at what Israeli government officials have been saying for years. Just last week Bezalel Smotrich called for the “complete destruction” of Gaza — far more explicitly genocidal than “from the river to the sea” — and for the annexation of the West Bank if the UN were to recognize a Palestinian state. That level of hate is, at the very least, heartily reciprocated.

I am Jewish, by the way. So inasmuch as this affects Jews as a whole — rather than Israelis specifically — it’s not abstract for me.
> Also the entire point of Al Jazeera was for Qatar to provide political influence through media, not as an unbiased news agency.

Isn't this the point of any news organization whatsoever?
Could you make the same argument about in person chats out loud?

If so, then they better record everything their employees say!
You must be trolling. You're mad that people prefer something else than your own subjective opinion. Ridiculous.
> but something like a planter, another car, a curb, a tree, the front of a 7-elevn etc. is going to stand a much better chance of stopping a smart car than it is a 4,900 + lb. F-150 that carries its weight up high.

This is another area where looks can be deceiving. Those large vehicles also have large frontal areas and large crumple zones to absorb impacts.

Those small smart cars have small frontal areas and relatively rigid frames because they can’t crumple on impact.

It’s not hard to imagine scenarios where a small, narrow smart car would literally slip between obstacles where a larger vehicle would get hung up on them. This is especially true for typical bollard spacing.

> If there is a tree between me and a speeding car, I would much rather it be a Smart car than just about any other car.

I think you’re overestimating the difference it would make. Like I said above, the smaller area of a smart car makes it less likely to actually catch the tree (by definition) and the relatively rigid frame isn’t doing much to dissipate the energy it’s carrying.

Looks can be deceiving. I know everyone wants to believe smart cars are super safe alternatives, but any of these thousand pound vehicles isn’t going to be good to go up against. The differences are more nuanced than your eyes would tell you.
Few questioned Ukraine's decision to ban RT's operations. This doesn't seem terribly different - Al Jazeera has very deep ties to Hamas, the enemy Israel is at war with, and has arguably been acting as their mouthpiece for propaganda.
Not only technical challenges, e.g. disabling some feature for the sake of security which will lock out some players... But what about content updates?

What if one is really unpopular?

Don't take me for a troll, I mean, what is a good update? Objectively!?

Because there would be this giant loop hole if you say "every content update is fine", that a studio wanting to kill off a game, they could just create a shitty update that most players hate and say "creative freedom"

What is really needed imo, is having technical updates distinct from content updates as much as possible and the ability to choose the content version for players... And self hosting servers etc.
The US has killed over 400,000 Iraqis since invading Iraq. Do you think that qualifies as genocide?
Wow I had no idea! Too good, time to rewatch both!
Perhaps their mechanism for “drug resistance” also resists damage from cosmic rays or similar space adaptation — and the drug resistance is merely a side-effect.