skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not fun, a serious tool, and extremely easy to use, unlike other formal methods. It works with your source code, not on some rewritten abstraction of it.

Embedded, automotive, space use it regularly.

I've setup cbmc and goto-analyzer for string searching algos here https://github.com/rurban/smart and really found some bugs in old published algos.
That’s YOUR area. Plenty around here without any giant flashing signs. Also long 100km bits of highway without cell service

Thing about corner cases is they do exist and need to be accounted for
I've been primarily using end to end encrypted self destructing chats for maybe 20 years at this point, especially for work stuff. Why should other people's poor data hygiene put my data at risk?
No, but that's the basis that you argue from
It's kind of the opposite. The cesspits that predated the sewer system were relatively friendlier to waterways. See this article on how changing to pipes caused the great Dutch stink:

https://www.archaeology.org/issues/327-1901/letter-from/7205...
Retro fitting all previous car & upgrading all am based equipment is not however
The cost of deployment into the cloud is $0 at a scale that is unfathomable to any rack with the overhead being a near zero as well. Initial capital investment for the cloud is $0 as well.

The self-managed rack:

1. Has to exist somewhere.
2. Therefore it required the initial capital investment at some point, which is a mid five figure amount or more.
3. Scales by its weight, height, depth and hardware specifications.
4. Does not scale beyond (3) – hardware constraints of blades deployed in the rack are very rigid.
5. Has to have available processing capacity to support the new workload.
6. Has a habit of running of capacity at the most inconvenient moment requiring, well, a new rack.

A new/extra rack:

1. Has to be paid for from a budget. The budget may or may not exist when the new rack is required, therefore potentially incurring further, potentially lengthy, delays (i.e. «no money in the budget until the next financial year». Boom.).
2. Has to be taken through the procurement. Depending on the organisation and its size, procurement can take anywhere in between 3 and 12 months.
3. Has to be in stock.
4. Has to be installed, deployed and configured.
5. Requires technicians and engineers to be available within a designated time slot to complete (4). The technicians and the engineers (all of them or a single/few) may be unavailable due to X, Y or Z.

Bonus points:

1. The DC may not have enough room / power / cooling / etc. You and your rack are now stuck for an non-deterministic amount time.

2. Adding a new rack to your rack HA setup requires a new network interconnect due to the network capacity reaching a saturation point. It is called «an expensive network switch». Add further delays, repeat all steps required to procure a new rack, add new/unforeseen delays.

With the above in mind, I fail to see how the overhead of a poorly scalable, self-managed rack is lower compared to a $0, software driven code deployment into the cloud at a scale that is limited by the size of one's wallet.
Yes. The DOJ sometimes (if not often) overreaches because they are taking a shot. These sorts of cases are often attempts to establish precedent that they can use to go after others under similar theories.

Flipping this around, do you think Google's legal team, which is probably equally qualified and vastly more well paid (and with a lot more to lose if they're wrong), would advise employees to do this if they hadn't considered such trivialities?
What do you mean? Not a native speaker
I’m not sure where “towns” (plural) are being built. The first plant is across the highway from a master planned community that was built 20 years ago, long before any fabs were being discussed in that area.

There certainly is a lot of development there, but it’s not like a factory town or anything.

There’s an outdoor recreational shooting facility across the street. I can only assume that is a huge culture shock for anyone coming over from Taiwan.
> But they are not team sports.

The tricky part for team sports is coordination with other folks. I can bike out my backyard and hit a 90 min XC loop to clear my head without needing to agree with anyone else on time. I also only have to coordinate with one other person for climbing (or often 0, if there's already a critical mass of folks I know who are there as often as I am).

I do agree that the specific dynamics of team sports are desirable (e.g. figuring out how to socially get along in pursuit of a common goal vs. a bunch of individuals going about their own pursuit...together), and often the social force towards not letting one's team down by ghosting or not practicing can be a motivating factor for a lot of folks on this site who might need that to ensure they keep showing up each week.
I guess it's all about perspective. I was born kiwi and grew up here until I was 24, then. I spent 10 years travelling, I lived in Spain, France, UK, Germany, Austria, Turkey, Dubai, LA, each for 8months - 1 year, and visited all the countries surrounding each.

I've seen a lot of east european poverty and watched covid induced unemployment convert entire districts of cities into violent crime pits. When I came back to NZ I found New Zealanders complaining about such trivial things quite sad. New Zealand isn't perfect, but here, in the great scheme of things, we have it good.
Why is that counter productive?

If I'm shooting down US satellites, and can therefore expect a military response, Id rather have the skies above me free from navigation and recon satellites above.
> what else are you going to use?

Even today there aren't many uses for metal (excluding brass) hammers apart from driving nails, stone (carving) chisels and everything involving deforming metal. For everything else you can use a "soft" hammer or mallet.
To be fair to Google, sometimes the genuine apps are uploaded in such a way that you wouldn't be able to differentiate them (for example, contracted apps that are uploaded under the developer's account and not on a government-controlled account). This is laughable if you're talking about major national entities but falls apart quickly on subnational entites (e.g. municipal governments) and on developing nations.
How do you know the drum riser is completely level?

The drool comes out both sides of the drummers mouth.
That's not how YC works. We're YC W20. We have a GPU offering. Guess how many conversations we had with YC about it.

What's YC going to do? They have a tiny stake in your firm. That's the point; that's what "founder-friendliness" means. They're not your board.
> It actually goes down

That is what you expect if you raise your insulin, insulin reduce blood glucose, so if the sweetener increased insulin without adding sugar then it reduces blood glucose.

> goes down since time passes between me starting the drink and finishing it.

Blood sugar levels are stable unless you eat sugar, they don't go down over time, unless you do something to add insulin to make it go down or add sugar to make it go up. Here it sounds like you adding insulin when drinking that and thus making it go down.
I think you're having a strong emotional reaction to something unclear, which is outside the scope of what I'm willing to discuss further. Thanks for the comment chain, however, I do appreciate it.
The question was about (hardware) "devices," which tend to be limited by chip technology, not browsers.

Are you suggesting that Arm and AMD and Apple and Huawei and Intel and Nvidia and Samsung are all colluding to stay at roughly the same level of chip technology - when they could easily be generations ahead?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RISC-V#ISA_base_and_extensions
Only ones with spark plugs.

Diesel engines don’t produce such electronic noise — hence why they’re used in radio quiet zones.
My mother often talked about children she'd witnessed talking about their past lives. She believed it but I'm sceptical. Then my son started saying things like "when I was a girl" which seemed to confirm it and my mother thought so until I told her he also talked about "when I was James the red Engine" and it became clear this was him recounting stories from books but in the first person.

He quickly grew out of it as his language developed further and I believe similar cases are just young kids being unable to express their ideas accurately.
If one were to go from a bigger scale from a home lab to, say, wiring up all the units in my condo building to share the same internet connection somehow (or maybe a multi-AP wifi setup in a small business like a climbing gym), what would you go with equipment wise?

I'm guessing not Cisco because the license costs?
Let's assume that Microsoft continues their path, and eventually makes it impossible to disable ads (or at least plays whack a mole as a game of attrition, increasing the necessary effort to the point the commjnity gives up). Would you continue to like it?
Joyless? Why is your life joyless?
> Plus, say a nuclear weapon went off anyways and all the FM transmitters died. Is anyone seriously thinking a lone AM transmitter 2000 miles away is going to help?

AM radio is simple enough to build with makeshift materials (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foxhole_radio). You don't need batteries or even a power source at all! (the radio waves themselves can bring power)

If civilization had a catastrophic event, I would guess that AM radios would be one of the few surviving technologies
Oh, I should have 100% said this instead.

Yeah, yeah, scrap what I said - let's go with Pete.
of course not for the rest of their lives. i don't even know where that sentiment comes from. the original argument was about the claim that a tenant wanting to renew a lease is unilaterally changing the agreement with the landlord. and that is simply not true. the expectation almost always is that a lease will be renewed, and if a landlord doesn't want to renew they are the ones going against expectations.

a landlord not renewing the lease has certainly happened to us. mostly i think it was because they wanted to sell the apartment. but this was never expected at the time we moved in. if we had known in advance we would have found another place. in germany btw, terminating a lease in order to sell is also illegal. the buyer of an apartment has to continue the lease. they may then only terminate it if they can prove that they need the apartment for themselves.
Yeah, nah. Engineering says no, unfortunately. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRREJZdRA8g
it's still a terrible name

it has four syllables

it's hard to pronounce

the last three letters can easily be confused

it looks ugly etc
in fact it is nothing new.
I'm not surprised you have to go all the way to Japan to find an example of this.
> I'll use llama.cpp via its python bindings.

llama.cpp also has a link to the model
It doesn't do quite the same thing. You're correct that pre-YieldStar, properties would call their comps once or twice a month to get their local competitors prices. YieldStar pricing is mostly based on leases that have been signed, not what prices are being advertised. RealPage's YieldStar gets a daily feed of actual leasing activity from all RealPage's clients. If clients use RealPage's leasing software the transfer happens automatically in the background, otherwise RealPage helps set up a daily extract & transfer of leasing data to YieldStar.
Almost every house in Europe (and elsewhere) has a wooden roof frame.
More curved means more optical aberrations. The Rubin is a so-called three-mirror anastigmat design that minimizes astigmatism, coma, and spherical aberration. (Chromatic aberration is not a problem in reflectors because dispersion only occurs when light is refracted.) A two-mirror design couldn’t be used in such a wide-field telescope without severe image quality issues, at least comparatively speaking.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-mirror_anastigmat
While I'm onboard with your argument, fundamentally you are arguing for a reduction in capitailism/free market.

One might describe your suggestions as socialism (not communism, there's a difference.)

Again, I'm onboard myself, I prefer the democratic-socislism of Western Europe to the unrestricted capitalism of the US.

Unfortunately though your argument carries no real weight in the US because there money is king, and the only thing that matters is the bottom line. Capitalism will keep pushing every boundary (unrestricted by a court system paid for by capitalists) because social-good, and ethics are simply not highly valued.

Even by framing your argument as 'socialist', I immediately negate it in the minds of most Americans (who equate socialism either capitalism.)

Alas nations have a psyche, and "caring" is not in the American psyche.

Could it change? Sure. But I'm jaded enough not to expect it anytime soon. It'll only change when grass-roots people want it to change, and judging by election results up and down the ballot, there's no real swing in that direction.
Its really simple, if you're in litigation, you are legally obligated not to destroy written records, and produce them based on discovery requests.

If you delete chat, that is destroying written records.
They were under order from the court to preserve communications, and changed their corporate policy to use channels that auto-deleted communications when talking about things that they might not want the court to see.
It's the other way around. Support for Qualcomm's incompatible platform is being removed[0].

0. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40212173
> […] to implement a burst-capacity overflow to cloud strategy for their compute needs.

8 years ago the cloud did not effectively exist yet. Today the available capacity surpasses the needs of the prevailing majority of cloud customers, with a caveat – see below.

> At this scale the cloud providers were not really able to react or provision fast enough, and required us to reserve the capacity full time.

A few things have happened since then:

1. Hardware capacity has been ramped up at a very large scale.
2. Most importantly, advances in the workload distribution and optimisation: the cloud control plane distributes workloads to the available capacity across cloud data centres.

The caveat.

For most demanding customers, cloud providers have a solution called «the cloud appliance». A truck rolls in with the hardware that gets deployed as an extension of your own private cloud within a few days. Deployed software does not notice a difference and gets automatically distributed to the new processing capacity. If that is not enough, another truck rolls in with another «cloud appliance». It is presumed that if one operates at such a scale, they also have the money to pay for it.
I haven't worked at Google, so maybe there are better channels than "chat that's holding everything together", but I can't imagine that being unable to search a chat and look at who said what and when is useful. I use it all the time to look up some random useful command a coworker told me long ago that I neglected to write down, for instance, or to follow up with a long-stale thread to revive it.

I suppose that's what email and design docs are for, but I feel a lot of that "organizational glue" in chat is quite valuable. How do Googlers live without it?
that's a pity because i think that is the area where i could learn something new. but thank you for bearing with me so far.
that's probably part of the Mesolithic or upper Paleolithic when people also started to use bone tools much more

The small brother of a string is a threat
This might be the right place to ask whether anyone is still making vases out of the beautiful iridescent glass popular among Jugendstil artists e.g. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vase_6_Glasfabrik_Jo...

I think it's still possible to source this kind of glass as sheets – https://www.delphiglass.com/oceanside-compatible-glass-96-co... seems to come pretty close in appearance – but I can't seem to find anyone selling consumer products made out of it. (Unless they make replicas and sell them as "authentic Jugendstil ca. 1908")
Bristow attributes blame to “massive underinvestment by private water companies who’ve failed to do their duty.” UK water services were privatized in 1989.

Welcome to the free market, where actions of rational agents produce the optimal result: cutting corners while getting paid the same and pocketing the difference.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgeon's_law

Sturgeon's law.. is an adage stating "ninety percent of everything is crap". It was coined by Theodore Sturgeon, an American science fiction author and critic, and was inspired by his observation that, while science fiction was often derided for its low quality by critics, most work in other fields was low-quality too, and so science fiction was no different. Sturgeon deemed Sturgeon's law to mean "nothing is always absolutely so".
> do you think Google's legal team, which is probably equally qualified and vastly more well paid (and with a lot more to lose if they're wrong), would advise employees to do this if they hadn't considered such trivialities?

Depends on what their risk-reward appetite is. Competent people will make surprising decisions under pressure.
It doesn't seem much different from trademarks, where you can't use a word if it causes confusion
Is your corp under court order to preserve written communications? That may be an important difference between them and Google.
I would love to hear your story. After so much trial and error what finally clicked for you?
$30/bulb worked back then, but if you do it now, it could be a quality bulb that will last, or a $5 bulb that probably won't.

I've got a big house with a lot of can lights, and it's not really possible to buy for durability. Obviously, incandescents are out, but if I buy a batch for a room to see if a model is durable, by the time I have a good idea, I can't actually get that model anymore, so it's not super helpful. And I'm not a monster, so I don't use multiple models in one room, so it's better to buy several at once. Different brand incandescents are fine together, but LEDs outputs vary and their startup and shutoff delays vary, and their response to dimming varies, and their failure modes vary... So yeah.
Yes, hardly a dungeons and dragons weapon, more standard military equipment for thousands of years,ever since horses and/or wheeled transports were first used.
You are looking at specific instances. For me it's about the systemic, large scale effects of the system. People routinely partake in exploitative systems without ill intent.

The examples you provide could be applied in spirit to child labour. Is every instance of child labour immoral? I don't think so. But using the example of, how you as a 15 year old mowed some lawns to defend systemic child exploitation seems to miss the mark for me. I believe not all instances of landlordism are bad, but as a whole its effects on society are very negative. And that remains true even if all landlords were friendly and full of good intentions. The systemic effects remain the same.

This talk for example while focused on a different topic covers some of the large scale effects https://youtu.be/ZuXzvjBYW8A.
Unions doesn't work that way in Europe, it is not something unions must do.

Collective bargaining works as long as you are a collective that bargains together, you don't need to have every single person be a art of that collective.
The DOJ will make whatever claim they feel like to extend their surveillance apparatus as far and wide as possible.
I'm amazed this joke appeared organically and wasn't forced. Seems too perfect.
You can already pre-train compression on text without using an LLM:

$ curl https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/11/pg11.txt > text.txt
$ split -n 500 text.txt trainpart.

Using a normal compression algorithm:

$ zstd --train trainpart.* -o dictionary
Save dictionary of size 112640 into file dictionary

$ zstd -vD dictionary text.txt
*** Zstandard CLI (64-bit) v1.5.5, by Yann Collet ***
text.txt : 15.41% ( 170 KiB => 26.2 KiB, text.txt.zst)

For this example, ZSTD warns that the dictionary training set is 10X-100X too small to be efficient. Realistically, I guess you'd train it over E.G. the entire Gutenberg library. Then you can distribute specific books to people who already have the dictionary.

Or:

$ curl -L https://archive.org/download/completeworksofl1920carr/completeworksofl1920carr_hocr_searchtext.txt.gz |
gzip -d |
sed -E 's/\s+/ /g' > FullTextsSample.txt

$ zstd -v -19 --patch-from FullTextsSample.txt text.txt
text.txt : 16.50% ( 170 KiB => 28.1 KiB, text.txt.zst)

Not sure how much performance would drop for realistic use. But there are also some knobs you can tune.

Refer to:

https://github.com/facebook/zstd/#dictionary-compression-how...

https://github.com/facebook/zstd/wiki/Zstandard-as-a-patchin...

$ man zstd

- Dictionary occupies only kilobytes or megabytes of storage, instead of gigabytes or terabytes.

- Dictionary can be re-trained for specific data at negligble cost.

- Compression and decompression are deterministic by default.

- Doesn't take large amount of GPU resources to compress/decompression.

- This is actually designed to do this.
1: You are similarly able to confirm yourself when you ducktype in TS, regardless: once you've ducktyped once in TS you are then at least helped by the compiler. Again, this is really not a good argument at all.

2: This is a programming practice I never see and would seriously question if its necessary ever, let alone "commonly". I think you may have picked up bad practices from writing in dynamic languages. Please see this for a few example arguments against this practice: https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/1873...

3: You are now debating that Rust has better typing than TS, which makes sense because Rust is made from the ground up to have extremely well done static type checking, whereas typescript has to comply with dynamic typing originating from JS. It follows trivially that Rust has the better design because it has more freedom to do what it wants. JS < TS < Rust
the thing is, you don't want to be the landlord that is vacant while other landlords are reaping the higher rental prices.

So for anyone, they would just opt out of the algorithm and charge a slightly lower price when they get a vacancy. I really dont think cartels work in a market as competitive as real estate rentals. It's a scape goat at best imho.
A High-Level Technical Overview of Homomorphic Encryption
Node.js 22 supports requireing synchronous ESM graphs
You do not have an obligation to create records for that purpose, however, only to preserve what you do create.
Do you test the engine against acid3?

I think what we need would also be something like acid4 as a test suite, because CSS4 with its flow-root rework is kinda hard to implement for browser engines from the CSS2.1 age. Basically everything has been changed when it comes to the parser's grammar and lexical approach. Things like nested conditions in CSS through media queries or supports queries are impossible to implement without rewriting the parser from scratch.

Do you plan on implementing all the event/media/supports related stuff from an isolated CSS perspective, including pointer events, transitions and animations?

Because having the @supports queries unified across the board would help a lot supporting older browsers without animations or without a tweening engine.
This is about Google Chat (in Google Workspace) which doesn't have E2E.
Yes.
It's speculative decoding but instead of generating just a few sequential tokens with the draft model they generate a whole tree of some sort of optimal shape with hundreds of possible sequences.

It ends up being somewhat faster than regular speculative decoding in normal setting (GPU only). If you are doing CPU offloading it's massively faster.

Edit typo