skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I used the parameters suggested in the documentation [1], which follow the RFC.

The KDF is invoked every time a connection is opened iff you specify your key with the textkey= parameter. It is ill advised to overuse this, especially if you don't use connection pooling, as it makes opening connections slow. You can bypass the KDF by providing your own 256-bit key using either the hexkey= or key= parameters (key= cannot embed NULLs).

I agree pepper confusing (because the pepper is supposedly secret), but this is not a salt either, as a salt is supposed to be public, but unique. Do you have better naming that you can suggest?

Anyway, I forgot to do this, but the intention was for the pepper to be changeable as a build parameter. Thanks for reminding me!

[1] https://pkg.go.dev/golang.org/x/crypto/argon2#IDKey
It's hard to feel optimistic about Tesla these days. Musk is gutting the company while dangling bizarre and wildly unrealistic promises in front of shareholders (releasing Optimus robot, self driving taxis, licensing self driving tech, training AI models on all Tesla cars, launching unnamed cheaper product lines – all by the end of the year). This will get a short term stock price boost and probably get his $56 billion pay package approved, but when then? Who saves Tesla from reality after Musk gets his money and checks out?
I feel like this kind of attitude is where we go wrong as engineers. We spend so much time and energy bickering over and creating the perfect solution when sometimes you just need to ship and provide a solution.
It seems like a perfectly good topic to me (and I'm not sure why we would expect more in an OP than in a ask HN topic).

The OP may not understand why but it is very common to have gaps when relicensing because collecting CLAs, etc, is often allowed to slip to the minimum for the current license terms.
Type theory vs. set theory is not the only choice. It is possible to combine their strengths in a new foundation: A single mathematical universe, just as in set theory, and higher-order features and abstraction, just as in type theory. Note that the listed strengths of each are the weaknesses of the other.
He works a ton and also has about a dozen kids, so maybe it makes sense to him.
I would guess a consistent and effective maintenance of equipment and decent payment system. I thought that the network was the only thing really going for Tesla, I hope everyone involved on this makes out well because I don't really care to trust some mom and pop to set the standards even though in general I really care about mom and pop.
European's weakness in my opinion is the size of the state. The state can only grow with private sector growth, but when 50% of all spending in your economy is done by the government and most people are employed either directly or indirectly via the government organic growth (without debt) becomes challenging.

Additionally for government to be as large as it is Europe implements significantly higher tax rates than most of the world which results in consumers having less disposable income to spend on products that drive innovation like tech and private companies have less money to invest in new opportunities.

Further, Europe is probably the single most unattractive place to start a business from a regulatory perspective in addition to being very unattractive from a tax perspective. Unlike in the US or Dubai where entrepreneurs will travel to start businesses, in the UK you would typically look to do the opposite if possible and start your company somewhere else.

Nothing Im saying here is particularly controversial from an economics perspective, yet politically what I'm saying is highly controversial if you like in Western Europe. I find people here tend to view it as the government's job to fix economic issues through investment, interest rate manipulation and debt rather than allowing room for private sector to innovate and grow.

At this point the evidence of Europe's failed economics policy is clear, and given this you would think politicians would be looking to try something different. But we're not. The answer if anything is that the government just isn't big enough, there just isn't enough regulation, there just isn't enough debt and investment, there are too many damn companies making profit while we grow poorer!

My guess is that Europe's underperformance will continue for a while yet.
...Usual exhausting snipers. No wonder the whole world is going to hell. Is any relevant vandal also thinking of a reply? Because the impression left is that you have something like "feelings to express". Which remains as collectively constructive as performance dance in your closet.
Cannot decide if sarcasm. If so: good one :)
Automobile should be scrapped before we get to self-driving cars. What’s a self-driving automobile? An autoautomobile? Get outta here!
If anyone is curious, the girl on the screenshot is a work by wonderful Ilya Kuvshinov.

https://www.patreon.com/posts/black-turtleneck-1936799

https://www.artstation.com/kuvshinov_ilya
Of those, only fastfetch is a true neofetch alternative.
Enhancing blockchain analytics through AI
You’re getting downvoted because chess is 2D, not 3D. The pieces only move on a flat plane. 3D chess exists and pieces move up and down as well.
I don't own an EV.

When I hear about Tesla and the Supercharger network what I hear about most is how easy it was to plan long trips. A road trip on gas is easy, there's a gas station in every town with a few thousand people, fast EV chargers aren't yet as common. So if your routing system understood its range, and where the charging stations where it was pretty seamless. Much better than the stuff from other EV makers.

Less often I'd hear about the chargers working more often. e.g. https://arstechnica.com/cars/2022/07/electric-cars-are-doome...
SUID has flaws, but it's not clear that there are any more convenient alternatives?
“Skeletons in the closet” implies an issue in the distant past.
They’re not, though. They’re button-activated valves with a fairly complicated flow path, integrated screen, extremely high lifecycle, and pressure regulation to deal with a wide range (one spec I saw said 30-90 psig) of water pressure, all while being contained in a single cartridge for easy replacement.

The details of everyday items are fascinating.
In the US, “for cause” termination is specific terminology used to disqualify someone from getting unemployment benefits, which means the employer’s unemployment insurance premiums do not go up.

For example, if you terminate an employee for coming to work late over and over, then the employee was clearly not meeting their expectations and they get terminated due to their own actions, hence they are not eligible for unemployment benefits. Because the state does not have to pay unemployment benefits, the state does not increase the amount of unemployment insurance premiums the employer has to pay.

If you terminate someone to improve cash flow, then the employee is not considered to be terminated due to the employee’s actions, and hence they would be eligible for unemployment benefits. Hence the employer’s unemployment insurance premium probably will go up.
I understand that surveys are designed to have a random sample whose findings can be generalized to the population.

But even so, polling ~1000 people and applying those opinions as generalizable to the US where 170 million use the app doesn't sound right to me.

Especially when the poll took place at a time when the news cycle was focused on parroting the government's case for banning the app.

I think TT is dangerous in much the same way that FB/IG/TW is: disinformation and division is rampant, and the app owners are incentivized to propagate it because of engagement. That's intrinsic to social media, as we saw in the 2016 and 2020 elections. Singling out TT as uniquely guilty in this regard doesn't help protect Americans from the influence operations happening on the other apps. You can decide for yourself if what is posted on FB groups or Truth Social is doing a better job of uniting Americans.
The desire to have a car that drives itself is so high that it overrides folks' self preservation. They'll pay kilodollars for unsafe systems. Regulation is the only solution I can see to prevent buggy beta software unleashing mayhem on the road.
> The letter comes in response to an inquiry by Sen. Wyden’s office, which asked the association representing automakers how their members respond to law enforcement requests for location information collected from internet-connected cars and trucks. He found that only five — GM, Ford, Honda, Stellantis and Tesla — require a warrant to provide location data to law-enforcement. And only Tesla notifies auto owners about government demands.

So, if the truth is being told, then some car manufacturers are breaking promises.

Vote your car purchases accordingly?
Second account to post this link: say what you will about the bots and — god forbid — someone saying something good about soviet union :-)
Ah yea here in America you're employer and pretty much let you go for any reason and there is not a damn thing you can do about it. Layoffs imply they're not your fault and firing does but it has no real meaning and the terms are used interchangeably.
Theory floating around Tesla spaces right now is that they weren't executing well enough or fast enough, so Elon is going to start a new team from scratch. Given the remarkably slow rollout compared to most things Tesla does, wouldn't shock me at all. Elon generally does not fall victim to the sunk cost fallacy.
Did you get the number of commits off of the network graph? I use "git log" to pull the number of commits but had no idea the GitHub web site could count the number of commits between two repositories from the most recent commit of one of the repositories.
> "But with regulators in both Europe and the US pushing the firm to open the Supercharger network to owners of other electric vehicles, it will offer less of an advantage in the future."

Mandatory interop is not nationalization. Words have specific meanings.

As far as I can tell there have been zero calls to nationalize the Supercharger network from anyone.
> giants in the satellite telecom industry join forces to counter Starlink

Sounds promising..

> The acquisition will create a combined company boasting a fleet of some 100 multi-ton satellites in geostationary orbit, a ring of spacecraft located more than 22,000 miles (nearly 36,000 kilometers) over the equator. This will be more than twice the size of the fleet of the next-largest commercial geostationary satellite operator.

Huh?

> SES, based in Luxembourg

Right, the European technological thought

From Investopedia:

> A mature industry may be at its peak or just past it but not yet in the decline phase. While earnings may be stable, growth prospects are few and far between as the remaining companies consolidate market share and create barriers for new competitors to enter the sphere

All good but it has nothing to do with Starlink.
You can pay for both. And most people are not walking around all day, just traveling between two places.
But not trivially loop-mountable. I guess it's possible, though. https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/268460/how-to-mount...
It doesn't track how much each file is being stored or pick what's most at risk. That seems particularly difficult, even impossible in the presence of bad actors.

Unless you make a system where the clients don't know what they are storing nor who else does too. That would be novel I think.
> "But with regulators in both Europe and the US pushing the firm to open the Supercharger network to owners of other electric vehicles, it will offer less of an advantage in the future."

How hard can this be pushed? Tesla put in all the work, took all the risk, and now they can be forced to share it and give up one of their competitive advantages? Maybe in Europe, but it doesn't seem like a U.S. kind of move, where normally you put in the work and risk, you reap the rewards rather than being forced to hand over what you've earned to the competitors.
I view these mergers as the executives cashing out of their failing company.
Genocide survivalship isn’t something it’s passed though generations, otherwise pretty much every person on Earth is a genocide survival.

If you want to get technical, sure the UN didn’t put the rubber stamp on it, but I think the more important thing is a strip of land where most buildings are reduced to dust, dozens of thousands of people are dead and millions starving. Even putting aside the morality for a second, what is the practical objective of all this?
I've check the website, is this tool free forever or have limitation? I don't see any pricing in the landing page
Not really. This isn’t about government boogeymen, it’s that people have wised-up about paying 50 to 80 grand for a golf cart.
Pink Floyd had an video art contest for the Dark Side remaster, AI won one of the songs, Pink Floyd did not use the AI itself.

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL0SqtI95X6o1pEYrtge5I...
The successor project uses musl: https://github.com/landley/toybox/tree/master/mkroot
In the US, they're complete synonyms. You say "laid off" if you're trying to be less direct about it. It's the same as saying someone "passed away" rather than "died"
Proportional to market share? Probably will.
I don't think you can infer causality here. There are plenty of countries with easy firing (think sweatshops) and abysmal wealth levels. The US is wealthy for a bunch of reasons, including being a superpower and controlling the global reserve currency.
> ... regulators are pushing Tesla to effectively nationalize their charger network...

No.

Nationalize: To convert from private to governmental ownership and control.
Anyone have any information about the actual individual asset valuations for a Tesla Supercharger station? I have to imagine that without tax benefits accruing to Tesla these investments don't pencil out on financials but are a necessary investment for people to feel comfortable about buying an EV.

So probably individual losses on their books that they no longer need to underwrite because the competition can start investing and operating them which expands the network for users.
The funny thing is that it's the same tradeoff that slavery was, just to a lesser degree :)
As a promoter of the rebase faction .. that's one case where I think "merge" is correct. Since you're not changing production without going through main (I hope), every merge should just go straight through ("fast forward"?)

git checkout production
git pull --ff-only main production
git push

(at which point CI auto-deploys 'production')

(edit: have you got "rebase main onto production" the wrong way round?)
Oh, nope, didn’t realize it was like that. Thanks for catching that.

Just the search terms suffice, too late to edit though so response here
> I don't believe you have, honestly, met children.

Stop projecting.

> Kids are cruel, and adults are negligent. Not always, but far too often.

Broadly, no. This is something that is taught. We don't live in an amoral wasteland, and playing sports is not Lord of the Flies. 99% of the time is spent playing, and not only do parents watch the games, many hang around for practice. I don't know if you've ever witnessed either, but they are not comprised of rounds of piling on one kid. This is not unique to any one sport, it's basically ubiquitous.

> You're completely ignoring the marginal kids.

Their being marginal is one of the points I made, i.e. they don't comprise the bulk of inactive and/or obese kids. And yet I did not ignore them: sports can help troubled kids, another point I made.

If there are those for whom sport participation is inappropriate, that is neither here nor there, it has NO BEARING on what I said. I made no blanket prescription that every kid must/ought be involved, but I'm highly skeptical of notions that large swaths of kids should abstain from sports on the conceit that "some kids might be meanies".

> your dismissive attitude

Your projecting again. Fuck off. Can you keep track of a discussion at all?

Sports can be beneficial for both a) the inactive, and b) those who might exhibit signs of mental disorders. Barring individual cases, it's completely uncontroversial to suggest it's an option that ought to be taken seriously.

> What sports do you coach? And do you, perchance, also teach 7th grade history? I feel like we might have met before.

Seems like you are nowhere near grounded in reality.

You haven't shown me any data like I asked, so there's nothing left to say. Content yourself with your specious anecdotes, believe what you want to believe. You don't care about what's true.
I think that the BBC reporter probably thought that "fired" and "axed" are interchangeable, which they are not.
They already have. Apple calls theirs "siri".

The dumb part here is a company getting attention for making a virtual assistant just because they added "AI".
In case you’re thinking that rhyming requires planning, that’s just as silly as a rabbit tanning.

You can make things up as you go, and the constraints emerge from the flow.
Yes, now they both get to begin an 18 month "Synergy Period" where both companies focus on navel-gazing to instead of the clients who are cancelling contracts and buying starlink.
I understand the competitive advantage has changed with the NACS deal, but the last major Tesla brand advantage I as a lay-observer saw was their clearly superior charging network and connector. People seemed to unanimously agree their connector was better, that opening it up was good, and that Tesla charges are more reliable and more available than competitors'. Why you'd immolate that brand equity is beyond me.
> It’s crucial to underscore that Hudson Rock had the data of this employee’s compromised data a day after the infection, highlighting a missed opportunity to preemptively safeguard against this incident.

Thanks for doing nothing while people were denied healthcare due to this breach you fucking assholes.

Fucking mob tactics here - "it's a nice company you got here, be a real shame if we knew something you didn't...."
In Europe they are. All new chargers in Europe use the CCS2 standard, and teslas have a CCS2 socket. NACS is not suitable for Europe, because of three phase AC charging (which makes home charging much easier/faster than in the US).

I think all of the V3/V4 superchargers are open to all cars, otherwise Tesla wouldn't get government funding for expanding the charging network (at least in the EU, maybe UK changed that after brexit).

Interestingly it's still mostly teslas charging there, although superchargers are one of the cheapest options to charge.
Well, I’d argue that could also be a bit enlightening. It’s like taking a moment to appreciate that forests are composed of single trees. It takes a certain level of insight to appreciate systems at various depths.
I briefly used Cyclic for my web hosting solution. It wasn’t great, it felt like their website was barely hanging on and took several seconds to load select pages of my dashboard. I guess they finally caved.
I think your (plural) problem is that you're talking about chess as opposed to a chess board.

A chess board is 2D. But, you could technically say it's 4D (3 dimensions + time). You could also technically say it's 1D (a string) if you play by just writing the chess notation.
Idk if this is worth the trouble. Isn’t a judge just going to stamp these requests anyway? Like sure maybe it’s better if they do but probably won’t be groundbreaking
Wild that you're being downvoted for speaking a plain truth. Worldnews is a full-on hatesub. They're rabid and deranged.
PPP is not only about living standards, it accounts also for the fluctuation of currency exchange rates, as you should've understood if you read the article.

The reason the EU seems to have fallen by 1/3 compared to the US is that the dollar got stronger, not that EU suddenly became 1/3 less productive.

Your point of view is just completely wrong and it's funny how you think it's the article that has it wrong.
China's Population Could Shrink to Half by 2100
Sort of interesting that it's the 4 big American carmakers plus Honda.
This kind of abuse will keep me driving and buying used cars far longer than I would otherwise. That means I'll be driving more with lower emission and safety standards. For me that's an ugly but good trade to evade making big brother my copilot. I don't know if there are enough like minded drivers to make this a large effect.
The photos aren't great at showing the scale. It was like a CD but it was as big as a vinyl record. like this:

https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3833/9373539522_a3065346b8.jp...
> Musk made clear in a call with analysts earlier this month that he is focused on opportunities in artificial intelligence, robotics and autonomous robotaxis.

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/musk-d...

Presumably that was before Tesla needed to recall all the cybertrucks for stuck acceleration. AI says blame the floormats
Due to the curvature of the earth, it's unlikely you were able to see anything 300km away.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_distance_observations#Gro...
> will require a warrant for more than seven days of location data

The first matter is: what entitles automakers to keep any location data.
> But for me it's a little disingenuous to start taking cherry picked slices of the EU and comparing them against the whole US.

Then someone says that it’s unfair to factor in the whole of Germany instead of just the wealthiest parts. Where does it end?
His reason, although clear, is also plainly wrong. Such usernames although bizarre may be encountered by SystemD so it shouldn't break when it sees them. Computer programs, particularly important ones, should be conservative in what they emit and liberal with what they accept and that means not breaking when they encounter weird but technically permissible usernames. His response should have been "Golly, that's a weird username, I didn't think that was possible" and then fix the bug.
I think there’s a fine line between protection of the public against tyrannies and protection of the public against themselves. People like to play ‘what-if’s’ but it’s not useful when people are immediately dying around us at this very hour.

It serves no one if criminals are protected under laws that are designed to protect the innocent.
> but this layoff pushed me away from the brand.

Why? They already have the largest network in the industry. And whatever the news says, they not gone fire everybody involved and stop making more superchargers.
Honestly, it seems like a cognitive dissonance of the entire right wing in the US these days; they expect people to work ever harder to produce more and more GDP while they lament that people are having fewer children. In the end, there are only so many hours in a week and at some point people burn out.
Based on my own experience, it's only high resolution because when I focus on an area my mind generates the details. Until then, it's all broad strokes. JIT image generation in other words.
Just pointing out your arguments could be applied to any war, e.g. Japan and USA in WW2: Japan lost magnitudes more people than the US, though it's really hard to sell that the US was committing genocide, especially given how aggressive and nasty Japan was when given free reign. Lots of parallels here.
I think the par comment is noting anti Apple bandwagons.
Computer Vision, ML, and AI in the Study of Fine Art – Communications of the ACM
He's a white supremacist, but I guess nobody's perfect?
> Being fired is for cause.

More generally, fired is used for anything specific to the individual, whether for cause (they were incompetent) or other reasons (the boss didn't like them). Laid off is for a departure due to company reasons (lack of demand for their product).
Salami tactics puts you in a losing position if your only option is nukes. Your enemy will play the Hungry game of buying off politicians and importing as many loyalists as they can in your country. Then they'll "democratically" vote in authoritarianism. Then they'll start on the next slice.