skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
We're getting way too fat and put a lot of stress on our environment. Cycling helps with both, through exercise and by lowering overall impact (way less impact making the vehicle, no emissions using it, very little parking space needed, pretty much noise free, way safer in collisions when no cars are involved, etc). Seems to me it's actually a very forwards thinking idea.

Oh and I live in Amsterdam and still own a car. It's even more common for Dutch families outside cities to own a car or two (74% of Dutch households owns at least one). The two are not mutually exclusive, but both serve their purpose. I take my bike for any trips of max ~30 minutes, anything over and I'll usually opt for public transport or car, as that's faster and more convenient.
The US should have the courage to do more. Order a full investigation into whether personal data was ever made available to the CCP. If data was ever shared, then there should be no payout to ByteDance.
probably nothing beside more scrutiny at point of sale of the buyers
Who cares what a startup is doing, they want to rent cloud GPU or buy GPU it’s volume discounts

They aren’t getting a better or worse deal because they are in the autocomplete business or the avocado business
In a proper metro area, where jobs and housing are concentrated, this isn't such an issue, as there’s a high probability both your and your partner’s jobs would be quickly commutable.

Sadly, America’s backwards zoning policies have led to a situation where nothing is typically near anything else. But hey, at least people can have huge front yards that they never ever, use for anything! That’s something!
The other big advantage is nonvolatile storage. The ESP32 can store the state of modules between restarts.
Or, maybe people truly don’t know what you are talking about when you’re excessively vague and coy, to the point where it adds nothing to the conversation.

When someone’s post amounts to: “you know what I’m talking about, I just can’t say it,” well, you might as well just not say it. You’re dogwhistling, but there are no dogs.
Anyone wearing glasses for myopia should have dedicated (reduced) glasses for the exact focal plane of their monitor, placed as far away as practical for the desk.
Oh im sure come election time this wont come back to bite them at all lol.
Actually, drang n drop is the festure, I never had problem in atlassian products.

Sure, their slow’ish, and went so many extra miles to torture people who use keyboard hotkeys (who could ever want to use standard ctrl+f…), but dnd part always just worked.
Would appreciate some pointers.

This would suffice for the fast part of my home LAN... the rest is handled well by a gigabit ethernet switch with one 10g uplink.
Tale of a Suicidal Container
> optometrist willing to work with me on reversing my myopia with a prescription

High-quality and affordable glasses can be purchased online without a prescription.

EyeBuyDirect (US) and Clearly.ca (Canada) are owned by EssilorLuxottica, global optical behemoth.
I’ve never seen (as far as I know) the whole lying to your own team about hiring intentions, but I’ve been on small teams that aren’t actively hiring but leave stock job descriptions posted from the last time they were.
Yes. About five years ago (so, not new), and for a smaller company. After months of carrying multiple projects myself, including one that deserved at least three more devs on it, I had run out of all the nice ways to plead with management to actually hire someone. So, during a companywide meeting, I loudly and firmly said I'd be out the door in 30 days if they didn't have someone started by then.

They hired someone, I handled the technical interview, I trained him, and then they suggested maybe I should find a new job.
Why Detroit's Black Tech Saturday Matters
In all seriousness: Can you provide proof of that? Because nothing I've read on the subject is definitive about methods that prevent it.
10 years and tens of billions of dollars to get to that experience. Not astonishing in my book.
Funny thing is that we already live in a world where theoretically no one should be accountable for what "their" devices are doing. How the eff am I supposed to know which messages my phone is sending? From hardware vendors over operating system vendors to messaging app vendors and potentially even the mobile network provider, there's a shitton of people that could be messing around with my phone already. The price for a targeted attack might still be significant, but it's not prohibitive for many scenarios.

So why would the content even be interesting for any law-enforcement agency?
If those are the two lowest bids what else are you going to do?
Aliexpress is probably cheaper, but TBH I just order them on Amazon. If you buy a bundle of like 6 then the unit cost gets around... I would have said $6, but I might be misremembering. Of course, for the number I've used, ~$4 and ~$6 are equivalent so YMMV.
not SOL, but you have to jump through one hoop -- you can download apps from other regional store if you make an alternative account.
The US doesn't need TikTok for that.
No, 85 is crazy fast and also crazy inefficient.

Yeah some roads can stand to be 75.
China's economy is 20 times their size, and their population about 40 times larger. And there's no comparison in industrial capability.
When you don’t want it coerced into a string?
I think everything you're saying is correct, but doesn't discredit what the post says. I think even books we don't necessarily resonate strongly with can have small, hidden impacts on our behaviour and thinking. They might give us an example of what a person does in a certain situation, and we internalise how we might respond in a certain situation. In this I think it is kind of similar to an LLM, where we kind of predict what our response to something should be, drawing from our past experiences on an abstract level.

I think books we do resonate with can have a larger impact for the reasons you mentioned, but I think they all have an impact.

I like to think of books as planets, and you're a spaceship. If you're not paying attention, as you graze a planet it'll slightly alter your course. Maybe in perceptibly so. If you are aware of it and resonate with it, you can kind of use its gravity to swing you into a different direct -- presumably onto a direction you want to go in.
I am still unsure where to stand on this fine tuning vs rag. I feel that for live data, rag would be preferable but for daily/weekly updated one, then fine tuning.

Another aspect where I am unsure is multi user for a model e.g. can we have concurrency for a model or the queries have to be queued.
Data Protection Laws World Map
"The refunds must be issued within seven days", so (while I wouldn't put it past them to try) telling passengers something so manifestly untrue would be grounds for a lawsuit, which should make them stop.
How Penelope Fitzgerald became a late blooming novelist
So they left you believing take the voucher or get nothing?
CodingFont
It might be more useful to ask it the other way around.

When and where would the average js developer learn this?
Athens is in Greece. Herculaneum is in Italy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_issues_of_Pompeii... describes why further excavation is an issue; "excavation has brought with it deterioration" and "An estimated US$335 million is needed to carry out all the [conservative and restorative] works necessary in Pompeii alone."

In particular, see the discussion about the unexcavated chamber of the Villa of the Papyri.

> The decision caused controversy amongst historians and archaeologists, becoming the centre of debate on whether to focus on conservation or excavation. Classicists argue that only by continuing excavations can more ancient texts reveal more about ancient Roman life. In particular, the unexcavated chamber of the Villa of the Papyri, where over 1,800 carbonized papyrus rolls have been discovered containing works of Epicurean philosophy by Philodemus. However, those in favor of conservation argue that texts are safer underground rather than exposed.
The corporate entity collapsed, but the consulting business continued at Accenture (and notably BearingPoint, among others), and substantial portions of the accounting business survives to this day as Andersen Tax and a few spinoff firms founded by ex-partners.

The only reason we haven't "another Enron" is because of Sarbanes-Oxley, not because Arthur Andersen was sufficiently destroyed.
Fool me once shame on me. Fool me twice...
Does the US have a legal definition of what exactly constitutes "personal data"?
> So why would the content even be interesting for any law-enforcement agency?

For the same reason a bag with Mary Jane or a picture of an underaged is "interesting for any law-enforcement agency" : they can treaten you and anything they want with you.

Welcome to totalitarism, my friend.
I think it's great. For both, problem is extremes of apathy to actual consideration of the effects in society and lack of rational regulations.

The important part should be understanding the whys and building access to a robust nonpunitive way out for those who want it.

But the profits of addiction are too important either way.
If you can't sell your shares in a company, I think it has a good argument for not being capitalist, even though you produce market goods.
I think the average frontend developer doesn't care anymore because they only have to care about relevant things, and this ain't it.
> An editorial in the Washington Post argued that "smartphone users must accept that they cannot be above the law if there is a valid search warrant", and after claiming to agree that backdoors would be undesirable, then suggested implementing a "golden key" backdoor which would unlock the data with a warrant.

What if there WAS a golden key of sorts, but it was split up (like "Shamir secret sharing") among several entities so that all of them would be necessary to decrypt the data (while also allowing for due process in cases of disagreement)? Obviously great care would have to be used when choosing the right entities and whom do not have any conflicts of interest or ulterior motives, as well as finding a way to prevent all the keys or whatnot from ever being in the same place at the same time, so that the golden key could never be stolen in its entirety.

I know that's not ideal and could still likely be compromised, but what other options are there for "tech companies to do more" in assisting law enforcement? I know CALEA/FISA/etc. is a thing in the US, but I'm talking about a possible "accountable encryption" implementation, which while may be impossible to be bulletproof, might be "good enough"?
I'd bet that most of such recordings are not even shared or perhaps even looked at by the author (personally, I'm guilty of this). It's just some sort of compulsion to record it.
Not sure what kind of EV you have. Ours goes over 150 km most weekdays, somewhere beteeen 20 km and 200 km on weekend days, and has taken the family on multiple 1000 km or more road trips now.

My wife drives the EV most days. I cannot count the number of times I have been running late and had to stop to fill my gas guzzler up. It is freeway most of the way to work ( no gas stations ) and I have risked it more than once. The EV “tank” is full every morning so it never puts her through that.

In practice, I have way more range anxiety in my ICE vehicle than my wife does in her EV.

Supplements and town cars? If I could afford a new vehicle, my ICE vehicle would be the supplement.
I “love” the now constant language of “accountability” from groups that have none, and have only ever demanded more power and less accountability.

How about a ban on additional powers until law enforcement and governments can demonstrate an ability to not constantly violate the rights of the subjects or the basic rule of law?
Only if one ignores memory fragmentation.
It's hard to imagine how a company raised a quarter-billion dollars off the same idea everyone had --and many already acted on-- after we all saw chatgpt in 2022. There's how many copilots already?
In my experience, this rationale is absolutely not why McKinsey is hired.

One of the most important roles that McKinsey can take is a third party willing to provide cover. E.g. often times a CEO hires McKinsey to rubber stamp a decision he's already made. Let's say the CEO wants to have a big layoff to boost profits (at least in the short term). Hiring McKinsey basically provides a veneer of objectivity, and within the org, McKinsey can help deflect some of the blame ("Man this sucks, can you believe that McKinsey!")
It does. They were tied to a point in time. They are destined not to be. It’s really very simple. I’m sorry you can’t understand it.

Mixing metaphors and claiming a now-unmoored vessel is more likely to be contrasted with one in a state of being “born” than “berthed” is what “doesn’t work”.

Especially considering “unmoored” is a nearly exact antonym of “berthed”, whereas a ship is never described as being “born”. Christened, perhaps. But certainly not born.
You started with fertility rate and switched to birth rate. The world fertility rate is 2.4 so just a bit above the maintenance 2.1 level.

But in pretty much all developed countries the fertility rate is well below replacement rates and no signs of it levelling off.

In developed countries, more and more the norm is to not have children, or fewer of them later and later in live.

Personally I don't think it's a good thing when we start closing schools cause there's not enough children to attend them but that's just me.
Honestly I think military is just a scapegoat for these people, their real mission (like many before them) seems to be using the lack of CoC acceptance as their own weapon to justify bullying them for having opinions they don't like. That has always been the MO.

They want the CoC to be able to silence undesired speech in the first place, and if they refuse, it becomes their strawman to allow them to keep arguing the same thing all over again.

To me this reeks of the "paradox of intolerance" e.g. "you cannot be inclusive without allowing people to say things you don't like".
How is this at all a response to the parent comment?
Are there seriously neo-communists on YC? I can understand reddit, but here?
One kind of data races, in-process memory not shared with other processes.
I think wsj started blocking anyone that uses bypass paywall, anyone got archives of this yet?
There also used to be Triplebyte. It filled a niche of talented people who have bad resumes and don't know anybody. Found a great job through them when I was starting out.

Real shame there's nothing to replace it, there's huge arbitrage in the market of good people who don't know people. If I were starting out now I don't know what I would do, how do you even meet people.
Love this!

Curious, wouldn’t this be great for folks with internal APIs as well?

Team 1 can consume team 2’s API with an SDK instead of a raw REST client.
Kyndryl is IBM??
If the United States didn't exist when the Soviets were around, we'd have been living in one giant North Korea. That's why more needs to be done with the CCP, which is rapidly advancing their military and is already the preeminent industrial power.

Jamal Khashoggi is just one man. Tragedy it may be, but insignificant in the larger context.
Pruning some things out with (GNU) find options
I'd never heard of Upscayl before. Very impressed!

Works great on my Mac.
Well, again - I think the isolated tribes are a good example. Two different examples are the Sentinelese and the Nukak. The former are actively hostile and violent to any outsiders, with very few exceptions, while the Nukak were completely peaceful and receptive since their first contact. These isolated tribes are largely a mirror into the past that give us a view of what humanity, in all of its diverse forms, might have looked like long ago.

In any case you also have an ancestor issue. The views, values, and so on that we take for granted simply did not exist at some point. Yet, here we are.
In what sense? He funds many companies, so in that sense he is still relevant. He can opine on how he grew the biggest company that launched today’s web, so in that sense he is still relevant. And let’s not forget, you know his name but he doesn’t know yours, so in that sense also he is relevant.
I like to think of this like fine-tuning LLMs. When you fine-tune an LLM it doesn't pick up and memorise all of the training data. Rather it adjusts its weights/perspectives based on the content trained on/read.
The gist of it seems to be that attributes sometimes behave like properties.

Setting 3 attributes on an html element:

<input id=good x=morning value=hn>

Then logging 3 properties with the same names:

<script>
e = document.querySelector('input');
console.log(e.id);
console.log(e.x);
console.log(e.value);
</script>

Will output

good
undefined
hn

I'm not sure why. The article says it's because "Element has an id getter & setter that 'reflects' the id attribute". Which sounds logical. But MDN does not mention a getter function for "value" for example:

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/in...

It even calls "value" a property AND an attribute: "...access the respective HTMLInputElement object's value property. The value attribute is always..."

And HTMLInputElement lists "value" under "properties":

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/HTMLInputEl...

So maybe it's not as easy. Maybe <element some=thing> sometimes sets a property and sometimes sets an attribute.
Interesting article. I had built the right intuitions empirically (except for frameworks, which I don't practice much) but it's nice to read it.

> The funny thing is, React popularised using className instead of class in what looks like an attribute. But, even though you're using the property name rather than the attribute name, React will set the class attribute under the hood.

Yeah, I never understood why they did this. className in their XML-like syntax is ugly and it doesn't seem like they needed to do this. They could have gone with class. They are parsing this with their custom JSX parser, and these things are not JS identifiers. IIRC you need to use {accolades} to put JS expressions (objects) there.
Isn't "it's not your fault" some kind of positive affirmation?
When there is no need to appear in the HTML
This is fundamentally different. Arthur Anderson was an auditing firm and did accounting. Their selling point was to be the "source of truth" for their client's books. What's that confidence is lost, then no one would hire them for their work. McKinsey, as a management consultancy, doesn't have to be a "source of truth" and offers perspective, which can be neither right or wrong. Management makes decisions on if they want to take McKinsey's advice or not.
Cool study and great to see some data on this. The numbers seemed pretty good to start out with - lower single digit failure percentage - but then they get an order of magnitude more reliable to tenths of a percent failure.

I’m mostly curious what happens when an EV has been neglected or left un running for long durations.
I had to fight with Lufthansa for a year to get reimbursed for hotels & new tickets.

They closed all service desks after flight cancellation (no strike, just their crew planning issues) and sign told us to find own flights and hotels.

Few months later I went to this service desk again in Frankfurt, their response was "Go get a lawyer, we wont help with old cases"

Thankfully soep-online.de helped to get all money reimbursed but it took 13 months.
Good article. There is also a nice middle ground with the data-attributes:

```

<div id="myDiv" data-payload="something"></div>

```

These data-attributes are then automatically available to JavaScript as a read+write property:

```

document.getElementById('myDiv').dataset.payload == "something"

```

However, one has to be mindful that HTML attributes use -kebab-case- while JavaScript uses camelCase. Thus

```

<div id="example-div" data-my-cool-data-attribute="fun"></div>

```

becomes

```

document.getElementById('example-div').dataset.myCoolDataAttribute == "fun"

```
why "violent pack of chimps" instead of free-loving bonobos?
When you say Java's JIT, I presume you mean C2? I'd be curious to hear how it performs with Graal. If what you ran into was truly side effect free, either the OpenJDK or GraalVM teams would be interested in seeing your use case for further optimization. You're right, this isn't something an application developer should have to think about with a good JIT compiler in place, but JITs are complicated and having real world code samples that aren't performing well are incredibly useful to the compiler devs.
The ESP32-C is a RISC-V, unlike the others.
Ask HN: How do I get into AI engineering?
I'm an electronics engineer but my total work ex of about 7 years is all in growth.

Data science makes sense as a first step if I really want to get into AI, but is that it?

DS to ML to DL with a strong sprinkle of maths is all I need to start understanding models on a technical level?

Any suggestions for a non techie with some tech hands on around this roadmap?
I'm happy to report that the internet is still safer than what "going outside" meant for me as a kid. Mostly we were blowing things up or seeing which roofs we could get on.

All that freedom was good for my head though, so I'll give you that one.
China is banned. TikTok isn't banned. You're conflating those to say that TikTok is banned, but your argument is what applies to China, not TikTok.

In the same sense, it's not Google that's banned in China. It's free speech. Google just can't operate without it so it decided to exit the market by refusing to allow CCP access to user data and to implement CCP firewalls.

You can conflate things to make them sound like the same thing. Words can have subjective and loose meaning.

But reality is very complex and very specific and doesn't have any loose meaning. And this is not remotely the same thing.
No, and no.

I'll leave you to work your way through that, it's correct and considerably easier to deconstruct than the papers of Alonzo Church or Scott–Strachey semantics.
I discussed this with a friend pretty recently. I wondered whether I was getting "older" because I couldn't find anything I liked about the current rappy-pop or soft, high-pitched chic-pop that you hear over loudspeakers at the grocery store, gym, etc. It's grating to listen to, majority of the stuff I can't even determine what the melody is supposed to be.

Then I realized that I'm listening to new alt/indie stuff that I didn't know about three years ago, and that it's probably not me. It's probably just that this mass-music for the masses is indeed awful.
I stopped looking at facebook a month or two ago because it suddenly became 99% spam "suggestions" from people I've never heard of before. Complete turn off. I might peek once in a while to see if it's been unfucked, but I have zero interest until it is.
Your sentence can be understood in two ways, I'll answer the question "Why use domElement.attrname instead of the corresponding domElement.setAttribute('attrname') and domElement.getAttribute('attrname')?".

It can look cleaner (matter of taste). It looks like a native JS assignment, and it's shorter.

For open and hidden, it's way more intuitive and convenient to set and get booleans than testing the existence of the corresponding HTML attribute (Still not a fan of this thing, years after having learned this).

(but maybe you meant "Why use domElement.randomprop instead of something like domElement.dataset.randomprop"?)
Isn't the rigidity of the wires enough to keep the sample stable? This doesn't seem to be real magnetic locking.
Two years ago ( after covid ) when the airline booked me on a another flight from London to Barcelona, the rebooked flight got cancelled… they lost my luggage for over a month ( because it was as loaded on the first flight )
the only thing I received was an apology… + 600 euros mandatory refund