skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Inline style attributes and <style> blocks already solve this...

Sure. The point of tailwind is to make this nicer, not to fully replace it.

I find the naming scheme and helpers they provide to make writing CSS a lot easier. Mind you, I would never claim to be a CSS expert in the first place. But Tailwind isn't trying to be something different, it's trying to make something easier and better.

I like vim too. I feel like there's a vague similarity here.
Sorry for being pedantic but that’s not components that’s just global classes. Bootstrap anyone?
Happening on multiple articles where they just stop rendering past the hide text too. Think the site is having technical issues.
Pick one of the FOSS-adjacent ones, ignore the haters.

Even if you pick a real FOSS license like the AGPL you'll still get people pressuring you to switch to MIT/BSD. Because then they'll use your project, and that's what you want, right? You're into open source to help others, and "build community" (blech), right?

Thing is, nearly all want to use your project, without compensation, and without obligations.
You might be interested in what else the author of the Serenity Prayer had to say.

"moral man, immoral society" and "the irony of american history" are both very worth your time.
One of their members had presidential hopes a few years ago: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/03/it-tu...
> Miles Sabin was always whispering in people’s ears to get them to publicly denounce his consulting rivals.

> He tried to get me to do it as well. It was weird.

Responding to a post about a libel case based on he-said-she-said allegations… by making your own potentially libelous allegations? Careful!
I'd rather be driving on the road with Autopilot cars than the impatient drivers, road ragers, distracted people on their phone, and people who drive like they're in a video game.

I drive with it on 95% on the time, and I really only need to interrupt when it's too slow and too cautious.
Most VPS systems have an API to manage security group/ firewall.

When you arrive at the new location, call the API to open up the new address.

Here is the API on AWS https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/APIReference/API_A...

Alternatively run a VPN or TailScale
This is so wildly incorrect at every step that I almost think you're doing it deliberately.
You start a business.
Nope. You get the working software from 1-2 years ago. And you get "hardware enablement".
Yeah, except of those people who have bought (at a significant price) those features, and understand that they're nowhere near their "aspirational" goals (When Tesla has been called out by the SEC and DMVs for some of Musk's more absurd statements, the company has quietly whispered to them "these are aspirational goals", and in one case, to the California DMV, "Musk's visionary statements are not reflective of engineering reality")...

a significant portion of them still allow their car to do stupid/dangerous/risky things, because they believe that the car learns and adapts from this, and sends this data back to Tesla for further learning.

Which it doesn't, as this article states. Those drivers are "it's okay if I run the occasional stop sign because it'll help my Tesla stop at the next one", "it's okay if I do XYZ..." when it won't do anything except put others (and themselves) at risk.
The relevant metric should be accident rate per million miles driven. What is the rate with autopilot vs without autopilot.
Amazingly that wasn't an issue for over a decade, before the trade and proxy wars started...
There already are no options if you don't want to beg china for permission any time you want to use your property.
> Gov pushes their security responsibilities

/their/?? Hmm...

Otherwise, agreed.
To be fair, I don’t think Autopilot is well defined in any governing literature. We’re in the wild west.
I don't know if this is a common sentiment, but I like that I'm in a moment when, before I search, I ask myself where the best place to go for that knowledge is.

I still use DDG as my default search engine (I suspect I should be using Kagi). But more and more I'm just talking to ChatGPT via the iOS app and asking it to provide links for further reading.
Why are we even going there when the article, and the NHTSA report note some very easy first steps?

As Ars has noted time and again, Tesla's Autopilot system has a more permissive operational design domain than any comparable driver-assistance system that still requires the driver to keep their hands on the wheel and their eyes on the road, and NHTSA's report adds that "Autopilot invited greater driver confidence via its higher control authority and ease of engagement."
As a happy LXD user, I'm curious what your draw is to bhyve?

If you don't need the strict security boundary, Linux containers have drastically better memory management than any VMM I've played with.
The size of that house in the pictures a good framing crew could frame that house in about 2 days. Framing is one the fastest parts in construction. Finishing is where all the other time is spent. Even a small crew would not take too long to frame a house that size.
> Protectionism hurts the ultimate consumer of the product.

In times of good economies, open borders, and peace, it might. But it also incurs significant risk if there are disruptions.

> If domestic companies require patronage from the state in order to remain in business, they should not exist, no matter the conditions in some other jurisdiction.

DJI and similar Chinese tech companies are benefiting from very significant protectionism, themselves. Should they not exist?
For anyone reading this since its pretty high, it's one of those cases of really high HN bias, that actually got to me.

I'm not blaming OP, the question seems innocent enough, but I had this bias and some others myself until I used Tailwind for an actual project and have never looked back, and most of the criticism that appears in HN is just misunderstood concepts and harsh sounding soundbites.

I distrust HN's general sentiment on stuff more (if there is such a thing but you know what I mean), I check for myself.

Regarding tailwind specifically, it's the modern way of "just css" which goes amazingly well with having the component abstraction level.

You don't abstract your css, you keep it all in base level, you abstract components, in this particular case you would go to your button component and change all of the application's button at once.
This whole company is going to collapse into an Enron isn't it?
The US will never be involved in a defensive war - geography makes that more or less certain. It's not like we'd ever allow a neighboring nation to join a military alliance with an adversarial force, and so there simply will never be a ground threat. And ocean based threats are also probably obsolete. Send a bunch of carriers and destroyers against any modern nation, and they're going to go pop. This, famously, is exactly what happened in a wargame over a hypothetical war with Iran! [1] So if another country ever attacks the US, it's going to be in the form of a massive nuclear strike. Conventional military forces have been largely relegated to invading non-nuclear nations, or engaging in proxy wars against other nations.

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Challenge_2002
JPMorgan CEO: "Now, every place is competitive."
Actually, 4+ GB of RAM on a smartphone is now pretty standard. In terms of entry-level devices, the iPhone SE has 4 GB, the Galaxy A54 has 6 GB, and the Pixel 7a has 8 GB. There are of course lots of older phones in the wild, but the ones with 1GB or less are pretty sluggish and getting rare.
Harder to use and maintain then tailwind.
Another post about Tailwind, another person claiming it's exactly equal to inline CSS eye roll. This one uses a "back to" qualifier, implying a historical revision that inline styles were ever the sanctioned way! Good lord...

There is plenty of info out there about why Tailwind, or rather utility-first in general, works in many situations. The "classic" way is still also appropriate. I use both depending on the project, though I really like Tailwind and is by far my favourite method most of the time. I say this as someone in their 40s who has been enjoying writing CSS since it was first introduced in the late 90s (yep, guilty of Stockholm Syndrome here).
> The Pentagon also quietly launched Project Maven in 2017, an effort to use machine learning (a form of AI) for analyzing massive datasets consisting of surveillance images taken by drones in the Middle East and other locations.

I see a lot of huge contracts for big initiatives listed here. Maven and similar projects have had problems adapting to conditions on the ground in Ukraine at least according to a recent NYT article. [0] It would be comforting to see more ground-up projects that start from actual battlefield conditions and work from there to the tech solutions.

[0] https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/23/us/politics/ukraine-new-a...

Edit: added source.
Right, so that’s a dataset of 1. Are you suggesting responsible disclosure never works because of your one time experience?
Windows has that. Kinda.

CMD + Number repeatedly cycles between windows of the same app where Number is the position of the app in Taskbar.

There are apps to make Windows behave like macOS. One of them is: https://github.com/sigoden/window-switcher

I also found some AutoHotkey scripts to do the same thing:
https://superuser.com/questions/1604626/easy-way-to-switch-b...
The US has a mature and highly diversified drone industry with excellent tech. It just isn't targeted at consumers, which is the market segment where DJI plays.
The utility is relative to the purpose. If everything is compute that you don't know how to program, and that's all you want to do - sure that's useless.

If you what you want is a powerful analysis framework, that's gold.
If you know how to abstract your way forward with that framework that too.

So arguing that the distinction is useless because it's universal, is like saying logic is useless because it's universal.
I am surprised the person was surprised. I was using a lot of coffee shop WiFi in 2010's and earlier, and random injection was fairly common. Sometimes generic ads, sometimes timers ("You get free wifi for 1 hour, you have 42 minutes remaining"), sometimes ads for the coffee shop itself.
Not really. OP suggested to have classes for color palette which is completely reasonable. The tailwind role is to provide easy to use, read and maintain classes. It is not to manage color palette of the project.
"Patronage from state" is a sensationalist way of putting us trying to avoid being overly dependent on a hostile dictatorship. Yes, the consumer will pay more but in this case it's worth it. It's like paying more for something because of insurance costs.
Python has two types of strings: byte strings (every character is in the range of 0-255) and Unicode strings (every character is a Unicode codepoint). In Python 2.x, "" maps to a byte string and u"" maps to a Unicode string; in Python 3.x, "" maps to a unicode string and b"" maps to a byte string.

If you typed in "éķů" in Python 2.7, what you get is a string consisting of the hex chars 0xC3 0xA9 0xC4 0xB7 0xC5 0xAF, which if you printed it out and displayed it as UTF-8--the default of most terminals--would appear to be éķů. But "éķů"[1] would return a byte string of \xa9 which isn't valid UTF-8 and would likely display as garbage.

If you instead had used u"éķů", you'd instead get a string of three Unicode code points, U+00E9 U+0137 U+016F. And u"éķů"[1] would return u"ķ", which is a valid Unicode character.
I like your conviction Re "functional programming is very easy to grasp".

Many won't but I agree in the purest (sorry) sense.

There is no scattered changing state. I think we all learned input-function-output as a construct in maths class?

Spreadsheets (sans-VBA) is arguably the most prolific programming language and simplest, being used by people who do not recognise they are programming. Felienne Hermans gave a good talk on this subject in GOTO 2016.

Spreadsheets have numerous shortfalls though, and "real" functional programming languages make it difficult to not feel intimidated: in my experience, but this is getting much better.

[1] is a game of life in calculang, functional language I'm developing, where for all it's verbosity at least I hope the rules and development over generation (g) can be reasoned with (sans-state!).

Not very practical but can show calculang computation/workings as it progresses and as parameters change - things that are easy for FP and otherwise intractable, and which further help with reasoning.

But, a big challenge is to be approachable (not intimidating), and I'm trying to make that better. I think it helps enormously to be focused on numbers as calculang is, and not general programming.

[1] https://6615bc99ad130f0008ecc588--calculang-editables.netlif...
The underlying issue isn't the name, it's the mismatch between marketing claims, actual performance, and what it lets you "get away" with.

They released a system that will engage on almost any road and provides a firm steering force that will steer without driver interaction.

Unlike some competing systems, they did not include dedicated hardware for monitoring driver attention, or restrict operation to separated highways.

Ever since, they have been trying to layer on increasingly annoying nags to jiggle the wheel, or use the low res interior camera to try to determine driver attention, to try to work backwards from the fact that they didn't provide for proper driver monitoring to begin with or build a system that discourages zoning out.
Mike Pinder, Moody Blues founding member, dies at 82
>> Perhaps by having a dataset of symbols...a model for how to respond to inputs....

> That's the same as saying the machine has some kind of internal model of the world...as understood by the machine.

An object can contain a model of (a part of) the world without actually understanding it (for example, a printed photograph or an abacus does this).

The LLM or some machine can have a detailed model of the world--which humans can meaningfully interact with to get outputs--without the machine actually having any true understanding itself.

This thread makes me wonder if there are different (nuanced) usages of the word "understanding" at play (and maybe related words too).

It also makes me curious--not to pick on the subject, but I think it is relevant: Do you happen hold the view that humans can be described with a purely physical model (mechanical, chemical, electric, or whatever materialistic form[s] of choice)? E.g., that humans are also just machines, however advanced/complex? I hypothesize that such a view might constrain the definition of "understanding" to a subset of its possible meanings, to which the article in the OP might not be constrained.

Regardless, I appreciate the discussion.
https://archive.ph/GMcq9
The aspirational claims are not about Autopilot, but FSD (and I agree that having people pay for FSD in 2015 is borderline fraudulent. It is a consumer protection matter, not a safety matter.)

Again, the statements to California DMV or SEC or Congress is one thing. Whether the owner is confused by the abilities of their vehicle post purchase and driving for a week is a distinct matter.

> Those drivers are "it's okay if I run the occasional stop sign because it'll help my Tesla stop at the next one

I think this is simply a made-up and ridiculous characterization. People break traffic laws all the time because they are selfish and it is convenient for themselves. Tesla drivers are no different. Have you seen a single consumer, not an employee, who does this for training data for Tesla?
You only get neo-reactionaries out of people that define their freedom as including their abilities to coerce others, and then get frustrated that said "freedom" is being impinged. They think they're morally right because they've defined away the coercion.

Personally, around the time the whole Unqualified Reservations / NRx thing was starting up, I considered myself a libertarian with more rightist sympathies. Reading UR and its classification of left versus right is actually what pushed me back into seeing that my philosophy is more aligned with the left. Axiomatic framing and fundamentalism simply doesn't work (cf Gödel). Systems need to be judged on their effective results regardless of their implementations' terminology.
Perhaps ambitious for a weekend but Chris Miller’s Chip War will enlighten you quite a bit about both Silicon Valley’s history and the current politics around semiconductors.
> A lot of Tesla marketing over the years has been super deceptive to the point that a lot of people assume the car is capable of fully self driving itself

The thing is, it's not just marketing that's contributing to these misunderstandings. The car actually is capable of fully driving itself... most of the time. So it's not so much that their marketing is misleading as it is that the reality of the situation is itself misleading, if you don't pay close enough attention to the system's limitations and caveats.
Nobody said that Tailwind is something super special and there's only one way to do this. I find it nicer than hand-writing global classes. YMMV.

My point is just that "If I want five buttons to change, I have to go find five places to edit it" isn't the reality of working with the tool in its intended way.
Thanks. Substance Designer, Substance Painter, Metashape, Blender, Marmoset. We are mainly using these softwares. For the atlases we are using Details Capture from VFX Grace
> , it only records an accident if the airbags deploy,

I've often wondered if Tesla is gaming the figures by only deploying the airbags in really bad crashes, whereas other manufacturers might deploy the airbags for pretty minor bumps.

This in turn makes them look really good on 'number of accidents where airbags deploy'.
i got caught up in this :( really sad about the whole thing; this was by far the best job i've had in my 20-year career (including other teams at google), and i do not know if i will ever have another one as good. we were a chronically understaffed team supporting a large part of the python ecosystem at google, and we did some amazing work over the years.
"To the greatest extent permitted by, but not in contravention of, applicable law, Affirmer hereby overtly, fully, permanently, irrevocably and unconditionally waives, abandons, and surrenders all of Affirmer's Copyright and Related Rights [...]"

It being "to the greatest extent permitted by applicable law" I think you are imprecise here:

> there’s nothing of value in the idea that you’re still the copyright holder, since there are no longer any copy rights retained nor copyright protection under any laws
The USA's strategy for national defense is "offense is the best defense".
It's not for lack of opportunities. 1948, 1949, 1967... a half dozen others.

At some point, you can't keep turning down every deal that would provide a state and then complain that there's no state.
... with some of the functionality of SSH keys removed, like being able to use one key for many accounts, or many keys (on many machines) all for the same account.

At least that's how I understand it.
You read it 40 years ago? You didn't remember anything or have any takeaways, so you read the wikipedia article, was dismissive then got defensive.

Idk, it seems faux-intellectual when you read a wikipedia page and copypaste a minor point of contention irrelevant to the topic and declare it 'no big deal'.

The fact that you mention sophists, mean you are way out of your element.

OH! You read some plato as a college kid! I'm talking to someone who is pretending they read plato under their own free will. Heck, you never even read Gorgias!

Wow detective work huh
agree. i can tell it was a bad day for the author and it sucks. but it's irritating to sit there and blame the exact system and company that gave him the exceptional job and pay in the first place.

everyone who works in FAANG, if you are drawing an enormous salary and bonus, compared to the average guy, i hope you realize the how fortunate you are. i hope you are putting away, saving, investing, at least 1/3 or 1/2 of it. when and if this happens after a few years, unlike the average guy, you can simply choose to retire or take some time off and travel rather than the normal option of loosing your home and being completely ruined.
Whither Serverless Compute? Or Why the Cloudflare-PartyKit Acquisition Matters
I'm assuming tech people would also like to know that a passkey is not just "a really long password" but also one that's never sent to the server directly - instead it's used in a challenge/response protocol (like SSH keys). Which requires software, either the browser or an external password manager, to run.

I think that's what you're getting at in paragraph 3?

There's no reason you couldn't have an open source passkey manager that allows you to backup and view the key if you really want to. SSH works just fine that way.
I clicked through to the article. I think the title is inaccurate. The paper primarily goes into detail about the Department of Defense heavily investing in startups, incubators and silicon valley. That's the vast majority of the paper. The paper has significantly less in the way of laying out how that's been successful, or how that's transformed the MIC.

This follows (NYT?) reporting that Project Maven hasn't yet been successful, with it under-performing human analysts significantly in core missions (identifying targets).

I think a more accurate headline might be, "how the Defense Department is transforming the MIC; a bold bet on silicon valley, high-tech systems and AI"?
> it's also not Tesla's responsibility to nanny people

Yes, it is. An L2 driver assist system must ensure that the driver is always actively supervising, and Tesla's systems failed to do that. That's why they recalled 2 million cars.
I mean it seems pretty likely that a smaller, lower range, kill drone could be developed that is designed for the express purpose of identifying other small flying objects and entangling them causing them to drop out of the sky.

The harder part I see is friend/foe identification, rather than just attacking anything else that's small and flying slowly.
Supporting the most-used database engine through 2050
Police say offensive voice recording of school principal was a deep fake
Big money in MIC. Temptation hard to avoid.
Maybe he chose England so he could understand the language and system of justice.
Yea honestly this is very similar to a building built from CMU and not adding siding or interior furring strips for drywall on a CMU build. Honestly, walls are one the faster things in building anyways. It's all the other finishing work where all the time is spent.