skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Development speed is many times lower than with Typescript frameworks, while the result is not faster or significantly more stable.

Why should anyone choose Dioxus over Sveltekit, Next or Nuxt? I never had an issue with a frontend app that the borrow checker would have catched. Error handling was an issues some years ago but is solved by now when using one of those modern frameworks. (I don't know if Dioxus has error boundaries, though.)

Those Rust fullstack frameworks make sense only for people wanting to use Rust, not for people looking for the right tool for the job.
Fun product that people want to buy?
Didnt bother in the end.

I had concernes about all the Edelweiss effecting my Hay fever. Cow bells and swiss horns being too loud and mountains too high to climb.

I must say it looks great in the book Heidi.

A beautiful Swiss girl and a scruffy young lad living on a council estate in London.

Surely a match made in heaven when you are 10 years old.

She was my first real love.
Welcome to HN! Please Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes [0]

[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
The number of deaths matters, but the distribution of deaths also matters. When you drive, you are in control of the amount of risk you take, and your likelihood of a crash - it’s not the same probability for everyone.
It’s interesting to me that you referred to all drugs as one big bucket (“drug legalization[sic]”), and then referred to the usage as “bake yourself as high as you want,” which is typically a term used only for cannabis.

Do you feel like your proposed rules should apply to all currently-illegal drugs equally?
im also being “laid off” buddy :)
I'm curious what studies you have seen that jailing people helps them improve their life or stay off drugs. From what I can tell, that is not the case.

"The theory of deterrence would suggest, for instance, that states with higher rates of drug imprisonment would experience lower rates of drug use among their residents... higher rates of drug imprisonment did not translate into lower rates of drug use, arrests, or overdose deaths."

[0]https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-bri...

Perhaps if prisoners actually received the drug treatment they needed.
"To be effective for this population, treatment must begin in prison and be sustained after release through participation in community treatment programs. By engaging in a continuing therapeutic process, people can learn how to avoid relapse and withdraw from a life of crime. However, only a small percentage of those who need treatment while behind bars actually receive it, and often the treatment provided is inadequate."

[1]https://nida.nih.gov/publications/drugfacts/criminal-justice

But as things currently stand there appears to be "higher rates of substance use disorders in prisons and jails compared to the total population."

[2]https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2024/01/30/punishing-drug-...
> while not burning O(10B) in the process.

How much do you know that Apple has invested in the R&D of the Vision Pro?
Sure I truly do not care what you want to ingest. I'm truly not a drug prude. I just can't deal with the drugged out individuals masturbating in public in front of kids and stuff.

As for baked v something else, I don't do drugs and have no interest so whatever... You know what I mean.
HCR provides changing things while th game is running in it's current state. fast recompile does not.

Start game, wait for engine to initialize, select level, wait for it to load, move player or camera to desired location. Now iterate on something at that location via HCR. If you have to recompile and restart the game you're not going to have fast iteration
How do you know that the game state is in a consistent state in the child?

A stopped thread may be in the middle of mutating an array or struct.
HackerNews and Never heard of.
Ha! I actually let out a huge laugh when I read that. Good one.
I don't think it's a huge surprise that a company that has been designing hardware and selling it to consumers for 30+ years beat another company for which this was both the first hardware they ever designed and the first time they ever tried to sell something to consumers.
matplotlib seems to have implemented this approach
Apple’s core competence is to wait for some good product hit the market and later improve it to make it much better and fetch their market share. Being forefront of the tech is not their skill, their skill is integration , supplier, and supply chain Logistics’s, and a design
> Or until the short-lived child process finishes its work and exits on its own.

I was talking about the malloc-deadlocked child. That will not finish.
This is not necessarily a bad thing. Especially given that Rust is an immediate upgrade with no downsides when moving away from C or C++. It is easy to see with people never wanting to go back, which also involves getting companies and products to adopt it as you would otherwise be forced by the market to work with inferior tools.

As a counterexample, .NET suffers a lot from the lack of evangelism - big chunk of community that started out back in .net framework days still thinks of it as poorly as people outside the ecosystem because they never bothered to drop old and obsolete tools and targets and give new versions a proper try (as the code is often vastly simplified and performance is vastly better).

Other programming languages, not only Rust, also do better at self promotion - take for example Go that managed to convince everyone to put it in the same bucket as Rust (which, personally, I find absolutely insulting as C# is a much closer alternative to Rust both in performance, features and access to low-level bits).
The Death of My Heroes
For a long time, doing training of programmers, I'd explain that bugs come about when we write code. Code left alone "does not rust".

In the last decade I've swung the other way. While the code does indeed "not rust" it does decay.

Primarily this is because software now is more integrated. Integration means communication and there are changes happening all the time. SSLv3, TLSv1, went away. XML became JSON. And don't get me started on SaaS APIs that have a "new version" every couple of years. And yes, the elephant in the room, security.

Unfortunately lots of developers in my age group believe in "if it's not broken don't fix it". They are the hardest cohort to convince "update things even they're important. Updating when its urgent is no fun at all."

There's no habit as hard to break as a best-practice thats turned bad.
Then what are the phase 3s relying on? Why is it so hard for such a bunch of supposedly smart people to figure out why their expensive trials are not successful often? Here’s a simple answer: it doesn’t actually matter to the individuals. They still get paid.

I’m from the academic side in the sense have talked to many folks who quit industry to start jobs and come from a lab that did get a drug into the market eventually. I might not know this “secret data” you speak of but given the results are crap, I think they speak for themselves anyway.
Domain expert? Link please?

I’ve never heard Altman describe so much as a ReLU, I’ve never seen him publish code, I’ve never seen him do a company’s thats not at least two of: fired for shady shit and self dealing (YC, OpenAI), a massive loss to investors and/or acquirers (Loopt, Socialcam, countless), paid for by a massive network of people who just back who the other guy backed.

The guy is a dark-triad sociopath, this is well documented [0], and yeah, let’s get fucking Larry Summers in there to play the cool head.

Guy’s a super, super creepy scam artist who fails up because people say difficult to define stuff like “domain expert” to keep the myth going.

[0] https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/10/10/sam-altmans-ma...
Check out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State-sponsored_terrorism#By_c...

You're going to have to come up with an incredibly convoluted definition of terrorism in order to have it include only people, groups or countries you dislike, but not include people, groups and countries that you do like.
And if you do that, then it goes back to the comment by the person you replied to that said that "terrorist" is a subjective term.
If you apply consistent rules and definitions, then most governments in the world will be found to be conducting terrorist activities, and mutual accusations of it lose any meaning.
Not just unaffordable housing, but homelessness and addiction is a nationwide problem. Only a few cities try to do anything at all, while the rest of the country just pushes them toward those cities. No matter how much money a city throws at the problem, there’s no way it can ever deal with it at the volume necessary.
It's "Lyme disease," named after Lyme, Connecticut (which, in turn, gets its name from Lyme Regis in England). Not "limes," that's a fruit.
Why not use DEET?
Or

How to make your first £1,000,000 in 30 days.

See how the pro's did it.

Its a Curriculum vitae mate not brain surgery.
I don't understand where you got `- 3ms p50 - 6ms P99 read-only! latency ` ? https://cloud.google.com/bigtable/sla doesn't refer to any latency SLA.
Subsystem for Unix-based Applications also known as "Interix"
Taking the queen doesn't kill the hive, not if they have enough 1- or 2-day eggs that the bees can make new queens out of. But it does happen that there aren't enough sometimes, so taking the queen can kill the hive.

For example, I did a split about twelve days ago, and the new hive started making queens. Now this was a very aggressive hive, so we wanted to re-queen it, so about eight days in we went back and destroyed every emergency queen cell, then two days later we went back and gave them a new queen that we purchased -- one bred specifically for mite resistance and which is not africanized. If we hadn't done this then that hive would be about to get a new queen naturally (and that queen would then kill all the other about-to-hatch queens).

Though, even if they make a new queen, there will be a brood break. A brood break is a time period during which no new eggs are laid. Here it would be about three weeks, and maybe a few more days. It takes time for the new queen to hatch, get mated, and start laying. If this happens at the height of a honey flow then the hive will be made much weaker because the workers live just six weeks in that time of the year. Beekeepers tend to force a short brood break in the fall to forestall the mites, but this is a bit much.

I don't have enough experience to say for sure, but I would expect that stealing queens will typically cause loss of maybe 50% of hives -- more or less depending on the time of the year. Also, if the beekeeper inspects hives weekly (a big if, especially if the beek has thousands of hives) they will notice that the hive is queenless and will probably re-queen it sooner than the time it takes the hive to make a new queen, thus reducing the loss rate. Commercial queens are about $45, but they're not available year-round. A commercial beekeeper might even raise their own queens for themselves, so they might have better availability. So hive loss rate might be lower, though still, it's not cheap, and it's labor intensive to inspect every hive weekly.
Really? Why web?
Strapping on a helmet with 4 HDMI cables running out of it seems like an even worse proposition than what they currently offer.

Multi-screen Mac use is already an extremely niche market - if the Vision line up had to ride or die on this, it would never have been born.
> I honestly never understood why [...]

I can think of an explanation. Your addiction levels are likely to be very different. And therefore your body's ability to avoid your substance is likely to be very different from theirs. It doesn't seem unreasonable to receive more punishment when you have more control over your negative behavior.
Altman is basically as close to the platonic ideal of “never give this psycho power” of anyone I can think of.

Dude makes Zuckerberg from the movie look flat fucking humanitarian.

Eyeball scanning poor countries.

Fuck Altman.
Reminds me of an Italo Calvino short story.
"toxic" is also to generalize from one person / one forum, to an extremely diverse group, many which never used Usenet
The care taken can only be described as mesmerizing. If you want proof that Apple is full of it and the whole "bootleg parts can compromise security," then here it is. Apparently, a lid close sensor is a major security risk - where NAND is not?
>Much of the anti-OOP noise is the result of people that have suffered from others creating hierarchies of the world too literally.

I think one of the problems is that a heirarchy is inherently opinionated. You have to choose the criteria around how to group the objects/nodes in your graph and that criteria is context-dependent. The example I've used with animal taxonomy is grouping your objects via things you can eat vs things you can pat. Thsoe are two very different graph structures of the same group of objects and if you started with one then realized you need to change, how you use your objects you're gonna have a bad time. Multiple inheritance is the bandaid solution that usually comes with more hassle than it's worth.

Building a UI is a good example of a heirarchical structure where you know exactly how you want to use your objects and how they'll relate to each other, Not having access to that programming structure would be frustrating and just feel like a loss. But I've also done multiple large refactors of Python projects because I relied on OO inheritance models that turned out to not be quite the right implementation. In those situations, Rust traits are a breath of fresh air for offering the right kind of polymorphism.
> Ultimately, you don't embody "society's relationship with food" -- you embody your own relationship with food

I should’ve been more pointed with my question. For a few years I was a strict vegan and I found it very challenging to stay vegan when travelling, with visiting others, and when at restaurants or cafes. This wasn’t an issue of “my relationship to food” but more the context of “society’s relationship to food” and my role in that society.

Having tried keto (a half assed attempt that I’d like to build upon in the future with another, real attempt), I think keto is a more difficult than vegan in the examples I gave above as there is a steeper learning curve for the general population given that most people have no idea what “net carbs” means or even pay attention to the carb content of food but everyone knows “did this come from an animal or is it an animal”.
Comparative Evaluation of Q&A Search Engines: Perplexity Takes Second Place?
some components, like RA and SLAAC, require specific ICMP to function properly. a properly configured IPv4 firewall on the other hand would allow no inbound and filter most outbound ICMP by default.

the only actually suspicious part of the original comment is...

Default router settings - as configured by the ISP
You could place an airtag in some of your hives. Cheaper than a new queen.
Right. I learned what binary trees were in college and didn't directly use them much afterward. Since interviews sometimes ask about trees, I started my practice of solving tree problems by practicing how to invert a binary tree. I practiced it so much that I can invert a binary tree from memory now, so that I won't get bounced from an interview like the inventor of Homebrew was from a Google interview.

Most of the concepts I learned, although I don't remember learning Kadane's algorithm for solving the maximum subarray problem in school, so I've learned some things like that. I can also implement a solution for an associated Leetcode problem in one line of code, so I wound up memorizing that too.

OP says "If you master the methods and ideas, you should be able to derive the answers on the spot", but I hear from a lot of people that does not happen, even (implicitly) in this thread. Any how, even if I use OPs method, if I do the same problem over and over and over again I'm going to wind up memorizing it any how.
Money is how we denominate human effort, and corporations are psychopathic zombies following their fiduciary duty. Profit is everything.

This is the system we built, neoliberal capitalism, and this is the system we would have to modify to do the things you think we should be doing.

It's about time, frankly.
As someone who has written a work anarchist political theory 15 years ago, my understanding is that many anarchist theories argue among the lines of:
The political question is not about whether there are hierarchies, but how to organize them in a way that:

1. hierarchies are not set in stone and won't get people stuck in one space

2. power accumulation and corruption through power is successfully prevented both in the short and the long term (ideally while still keeping the whole thing very mobile on small matters and more stable and careful on grand matters)

3. hierarchies are not steeper than absolutely necessary and there should be a high mobility between hierarchical layers

4. anarchy is about an absence of centralized ruling structure, not about an absence of rules. This might seem a weird distinction, but having a ruler and no rules is not the same as having no ruler and coming up with a set of clear rules

Most anarchist theorists would therefore have argued the notion that anarchy requires a higher sense of order and does not represent "chaos" as it is often described. One of the most important prerequisites for that was good education, at least in the CNT educating yourself was seen as one of the prime duties of an anarchist, because if everybody comes into the role of the decider, it is good if you know what you are doing.

Democracy is also a system that tries to deal with the way power is given, transitioned by giving the people a vote. In most anarchist or anarchosyndicalist systems voting is also pretty important, it is just much more self-organized, more bottom up than top down and came with ideas like strict term limits and rotations for all positions of power. Often councils where proposed to gain some continuity, with members of these councils often leaving and new ones coming in.

Please note that I describe that CNT flavoured anarchism from the top of my head, there are different notions elsewhere (e.g. less collectivist and much more libertarian ones in the US).
You would discover two very different problems between those where housing costs too much but were functional otherwise, and the other problem of completely non-functioning people where even cheap housing is too expensive since they can’t hold even a minimum wage job.

The only debate right now is whether the first category mostly leads to the second category (and vice versa if the second mostly comes from the first). That is should we just treat the categories the same or not, then more affordable housing would help if most people in category two are coming from one. If the assumption is wrong, we will still see people on the streets even if housing is affordable.

The other part of the debate is whether these problems are local or national, which has implications in how homeless programs are funded and where the affordable housing should be built. If all of the country’s homeless decides to move to SF, Seattle, LA for their affordable housing, the program will obviously fail.
It has been reported Apple spent an estimated $15 Billion on research and development for Vision Pro, that's a lot more than 10B. Meanwhile, Quest has sold over 20 million units. Apple might have beat Meta in "almost every way except price", but for now Meta has Apple beat in every way that matters.
The last decade has included the AirPods and the Watch.

They sold more AirPods than there are people in the United States.
> I genuinely wonder how much of our planet has already been rendered completely inhospitable to life? I'm not trying to be dramatic or bait arguments, I legitimately wonder how much.

As has already been pointed out by multiple people, none of it. That's not a thing it's possible to do.

If you really were legitimately wondering about this... you need to find some sources of information that aren't just lies.
Rust is good for software following a strict spec and design doc. A lot of what I do is exploratory in nature. Rust sucks there, fighting me. Best kind of languages in those cases are Lisp, Python and (unironically) C with Visual Studio debugger.
Last time I tried Godot with C# in Visual studio, when I debugged I could not see the console output, and when I ran with the console output I could not debug (the breakpoints weren't hit). A Google search later and turns out it wasn't just me.
I lived on Chilco & Nelson for many years... people simply have Starbucks cups with beer inside or other equivalent methodology of "wink wink". As long as you aren't being an ass there's zero problem..
At least personally, my chief concern if I was considering "open source alternatives" for office software would be to ensure interoperability. I use office software for both personal and business purposes, and I need my documents to get across in perfect shape to their destination for the latter purpose.

For better or worse, that is ensured not by whether source code is open or closed but rather by simply sticking to industry standards, also known as using what everyone else is using. That means Microsoft Office by far and Google Docs to a lesser extent, whether anyone likes it or not.

I suppose I should put it out there I also like paying for and using Microsoft Office anyway. I get back much more than what I pay.
Floorp: How They Do It https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMJk4y9NGvE
Show HN: Python CLI tool to convert YouTube video with context-aware screenshot
Anecdotally it’s useless. I’ve seen them walk right over DEET sprayed boots. They freeze up pretty much on contact with permethrin.
> We have no empirical proof that the permissive extreme works.

Alcohol.

We have plenty of empirical proof that Prohibition doesn't work.
Same answer as secretary problem. Why?
why not using the phone?
> Governments are beholden to the people

I have not observed any example of this anywhere. I suppose you have bought into etatism ruse.
This thing could run video games that looked almost exactly like the arcade versions - at the time this was absolute proof of coolness
Second best laugh of the day. The best was when I told my wife that the price of real vanilla seems to have tripled over the past several years, to which she suggested we buy a beaver.
I fully intend to be that old out-of-touch guy who is too square to wear his phone on his face.
At 5 minutes is when it shifts gears from the merely brave/experienced.
Every so often they try something clever with video to try to give you player POV or to make you feel "part of the action" and it drives me absolutely bonkers because it takes you out of the game and you lose all sense of the flow.

Admittedly this is because they just do ham-fisted cuts - a full POV throughout a game would be different, but for a lot of the sports I watch it just seems like it's going to make watching the game as a spectator more frustrating.
> Open source can never "win" a consumer market

Perhaps open source doesn't devalue consumers in a way that they are a thing to be won - not even in aggregate.

The network devices in my home are open source, as is most of the OS. With my customers it's a mix - but where there is open source, it pretty much just works.

Meanwhile, any complaining is typically due to the ongoing poor treatment by Microsoft, Intuit, et al.
Are you familiar with the history of insulin from porcine to using recombinant DNA technology? I think we’ll be wading in the shallows a little without that. The Wikipedia articles should be quite thorough.

Perhaps a quick self test would be to hypothesize the cost of Novolog before this law and then look up the price in old archives.

I usually do these self-tests to check whether my belief systems are accurate. But if you don’t want to, I’m not one to chastise. I just wouldn’t want to converse.