skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Honest question, not a critique: what's the point of passkeys if you already use 1password? It unlocks with touch ID both on computers and phones, it autofills and autogenerates username and password. Plus you've got the option to fall back to manual input if you don't have 1password available in a particular device, and credential sharing (outside of 1p) becomes feasible. What's better about passkeys with 1p?
Forking seems to be a sufficient value of open source.

Perhaps hou just mean, how do they expect traction if the open components dont entice marginal users
Republic First Bank Seized by Regulators–First Bank Collapse of 2024
When people make this point they usually refer to Vancouver, Seattle, Portland (OR) or San Francisco. What they do--and waht all politicians do--is completely ignore the root problem: unaffordable housing.

Lack of affordable housing is the number one cause of homelessness and it's not even close (eg [1]). California, in particular, votes in measures to fund housing the homeless but it doesn't really get spent. Why? Because residents, developers and politicians do everything they can to resist building anything to house the homeless in any capacity.

We have decades of long-term incarceration for minor drug possession to show this is not an effective strategy. That's what led to drug decriminzation after the crime panic of the 1980s and 1990s. Decriminalizing drug use is good. If people don't want to see it (which I get), maybe they should do something to house such people, particularly because homelessness itself is a major cause of drug abuse as such people turn to self-medication.

[1]: https://caplinnews.fiu.edu/lack-of-affordable-housing-a-lead...
Which is kinda pointless in this day and age of aerial warfare, and it's also really unfair on those who live in that "buffer zone". That means they're basically just a throwaway crumple zone to Russia ready to be sacrificed. Who wants to be that? And if they do manage to take over Ukraine they still don't have a buffer zone because they'll be bordering with Poland and Romania.

Also, Russia has actually gained a huge border directly with NATO as a direct result of this war. It's really backfired in that regard. Finland wouldn't have joined NATO if Russia hadn't shown how dangerous they can be. They were perfectly happy with the status quo until this.
Stop trying to trick your body into thnking you ate something you did not.

It makes your body cranky.
Such a lost opportunity. It would have been much cheaper to dissuade them of that idea before this war. The Crimea stunt they pulled should have been the turning point, but instead we get almost no reaction. Now it's going to cost a lot of money and lives to throw them out. :-/
Yes, I was reflecting on this recently, it feels like public drug use (as well as homeless encampments, aggressive panhandling etc) is putting the rights of the individual drug user well above the rights of society, which seems incongruous for the people that support it.
And cluster munitions, used extensively by both sides.
In the US at least this would require a court order, the government cannot just blanket search all private communications a priori.
We've definitely tried the Singaporean approach for decades in the US during the war on drugs. There's people currently serving life sentences for possessing a meager amount of Marijuana. It turns out it's far more complicated than "just throw them in jail and the problem will fix itself." Singapore is almost the polar opposite of the US (and to a lesser extent Canada) and what works there won't necessarily work here because of that fact.
> I've heard this multiple places and I absolutely agree: attitude over aptitude. You can teach knowledge, you can't teach attitude or ability to problem solve.

Seems like society should try to figure this out.. if attitude is so important, why can’t we cultivate it systematically?
They’re dropping a hard dependency on X11 and instead using a library that interfaces with X11 or Wayland for it.

It still runs fine on X11.
Everyone understands this. It was a joke. It is funny to propose that the commenter hopes that people will get together and go "wow, thank god that asshole has finally kicked the bucket" and this proposition is made possible by the fortunate coincidence that "get together and celebrate when I die" can, divorced from context, be interpreted in either the intended way or the funny way.
Yes that section tells the audience what their new rules are doing, why they are doing it, and justification for how they’re allowed to do it. From your own quote choice:

> Classifying BIAS as a telecommunications service also accords with Commission and court precedent and is fully and sufficiently justified under the Commission’s longstanding authority and responsibility to classify services subject to the Commission’s jurisdiction, as necessary.

This is clearly discussion about the rules in the section X and Appendix A. It’s clearly not an actual rule itself.

The actual rule relevant to your quote is the new Section 8.3 that they are adding to Part 20 of Title 47.

The current part 20 is here: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-B...

The new part 20 is given on page 398 of the document that you linked. This new section 8.3 is the actual action they take to specifically classify BIAS as a Title II telecommunications service.

> the first sentence is, in fact, the order.

No, it's a more-easily accessible description of the order in something approaching plain English. The new Section 8.3 in Appendix A is the "pointy end of the stick" of the Title II order, to use your terminology. The rest of the document is describing these changes (section X and Appendix A) in more plain English.

The actual order for what you quoted is on page 394:

> 693. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 13, 201, 202, 206, 207, 208, 209, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 230, 251, 254, 256, 257, 301, 303, 304, 307, 309, 310, 312, 316, 332, 403, 501, 503, and 602 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, as amended, 47 U.S.C §§ 151, 152, 153, 154(i)-(j), 160, 163, 201, 202, 206, 207, 208, 209, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 230, 251, 254, 256, 257, 301, 303, 304, 307, 309, 310, 312, 316, 332, 403, 501, 503, 522, and 1302, that this Declaratory Ruling, Order, Report and Order, and Order on Reconsideration IS ADOPTED and that Parts 8 and 20 of the Commission’s Rules, 47 CFR Parts 8, 20, ARE AMENDED as set forth in Appendix A.

Specifically, the last little part:

> that Parts 8 and 20 of the Commission’s Rules, 47 CFR Parts 8, 20, ARE AMENDED as set forth in Appendix A.

That is the new rule. It is an actual change to Title 47. The rule is not what you quoted. What you quoted is not part of of any CFR. What you quoted is not federal code. Only Section X and Appendix A make actual changes to the "Code of Federal Regulations".
it's retribution.
The idea of your old couple down the street is certainly romantic but almost never the case, and isn't the case here:

> Neighbors told Perez that the home was initially used as a hunting cabin.

A 1940s recreation instrument.

> It was later used by the family as a rental but became vacant for some time.

Then vacant.

Agreed that Prop 13 and China are both getting this wrong, too.
C# is that language (see Godot, Stride, FNA, Monogame).
Feedback received! We do have free lessons deeper in the course and lots on our YouTube channel, but will pass this on to the team.
Some would argue their quality of life goes down more from not being able to get high in the street than everyone else's does from watching it.

Ultimately it's more a property rights issue imo.
Purchases in the U.S. subsidize those other countries.
If we're talking semantics, the celebration is not so much for the deceased, but for the living "left behind."
With respect, exactly how much of this post was written with a large language model?
> The original comment about Tesla allegedly gaming the system by not deploying airbags when they should is unfounded based on available safety metrics. It's an unsubstantiated claim that derails the conversation from the main point.

If you read my other comments in this thread, I partially agree with you. But I also think Tesla's "we don't count it as an FSD/AP incident if airbags weren't deployed" is "convenient", given that "advanced airbags" (which are a spec) use a whole variety of means to determine deployment which don't correlate to the severity of the incident, i.e.:

depending on other parameters, you can collide with someone at 20-30mph, but have no airbag deployment, because the algorithm decides that passenger restraint is sufficient. Great. Except if a car operating in FSD/AP mode causes a 20-30mph collision with something else, that's a notable incident. Well, most people would think so. Tesla explicitly says this is NOT an incident when reporting FSD/AP stats. Huh.

> And, yes, I do believe that cost matters here. Cars exist in size and price classes. If you cannot comprehend that, that's fine. But it doesn't change the argument.

I can comprehend that just fine. But it's not a factor for IIHS, which is what -you- brought into the argument when you said "IIHS says it's best in class for safety".

1. It doesn't.

2. You can't then say "oh, well, if you consider cost as well, then clearly it must be best in class", which is a conclusion that cannot inherently be drawn from the previous.

It -may- be best in class "overall", not for safety alone, but that's got nothing to do with what you said. The flow of that argument was:

You: It's best in class.

Me: Not demonstrably, it's one of several cars that are in the top category for that class.

You: Well, if you factor in price, too, it's "clearly" best in class.

Everyone likes paying less money, sure. But you're already talking about the luxury segment, where just maaaaybe people are conscious of more factors than price when considering even this broader definition of best in class.
The grandparent might be referring to various degrees of decriminalization, not just the more recent experiment of decriminalizing possession of 2.5 grams of drugs and the allowance of drug consumption in public spaces that was backed by the BC court injunction last year. For example, Insite (a supervised drug injection site which opened 21 years ago) could be considered an early step in decriminalization, including acquiring a legal exemption allowing it to operate.
Yes, they are very effective at developing drugs, if you ignore all the necessary expensive steps, steps that often show the drug is worthless.
Except in this article, where they assert that the funds were correctly reported to the government with no explanation of what that claim even means. And they’re not saying that the defendant claimed to have reported; Reason themselves are making the claim.
The first example in the article concerns a student that was attributed as a signatory after a group they no longer attend signed on their behalf.

Call it attribution if you want but it's a pretty terrible job of it.
> After closing the first investigation, regulators opened another, this one into whether that recall to install new Autopilot safeguards was adequate.

Tesla in a nutshell.
They also starved to death frequently, and died of a lot of diseases that we now survive easily, so by your logic, I should eat more meat.
Not even granting public infra, we straight up paid BILLIONS for them to expand broadband coverage and the ISP's didn't do jack most of the time

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/verizon-pennsylvanias-com_b_7...

> By the end of 2003, Teletruth estimates that every household in Pennsylvania has paid in excess of $1,135.00 for a fiber optic service they will never get. Teletruth estimates that the total overcharging to be $3.9 billion or more in excess profits, tax deductions, and other financial perks, including funding other business ventures through cross-subsidization.

And it's far from just PA

https://newnetworks.com/bookbrokenpromises/
Not as attractive as those in the article, but still quite striking near me:

https://modernmooch.com/2018/08/19/trinity-united-reform-chu...

Somewhat terrifying when they light up the front in red at night.
Was violence involved?
You might not need memory safety.
Your first comment in this thread moved the goal posts from 2014 to 2018.

Now you say we aren't allowed to move goal posts? That's, like, meta goal post moving, man.
No epub ebook format for ereaders?
The one ISP is not going to do that automatically, because it costs more. Then only banks and others willing to pay a massive premium get it. And sometimes even they don't, because they run completely redundant fiber paths along different streets and then use the same OEM's equipment on both of them and a bad software update takes them both out at once, or their union goes on strike and cuts power to the whole operation before they walk out.

Meanwhile diverse ISPs wouldn't be using the same A and B. ISP A has a central office in a high rise downtown, ISP B primarily targets single family homes and has their switching equipment on a piece of land next to a substation in suburbia, so if you subscribe to both you not only have links coming from opposite directions, they're each operated by independent organizations instead of a monoculture.
Except we're talking about protections against phishing, and as much as I love the clipboard it will paste anywhere you like, including definitely wrong and evil places.
National retail ISPs should not exist. All Internet should be municipal broadband that should be subsidized or free by the state.

I welcome any ISP who is unhappy about this giving back the broadband infrastructure that governments have already subsidized and paid for as well as given legal monopolies to by, for example, banning municipal broadband.

I also welcome eminent domain to solve this problem.
There was another small study looking at similar dosages of creatine for traumatic brain injury. Time spent in ICU was halved.
> We've definitely tried the Singaporean approach for decades in the US during the war on drugs. There's people currently serving life sentences for possessing a meager amount of Marijuana.

That’s not the Singaporean approach. The Singaporean approach is executing people for drug crimes. The US has never (to the best of my knowledge) executed anybody for a drug crime, as opposed to drug-related murders/etc.

Not saying the US should emulate Singapore - I personally believe the death penalty is immoral and should be abolished - but the US has never adopted Singapore’s approach
> All you need to do is elect different politicians that will enact regulation that sensibly and responsibly manage the water

all of what you wrote is well said, I just think in the current california political climate (which is a little strange and different from the rest of the country, and not at all what people outside california imagine it is) what you said is essentially impossible as long as politicians are for hire by corporations. Anyone lobbying for this has no chance to get in a position to make any meaningful change.

The best hope for change is a proposition passing - california constitution allows basically any prop to make the ballot and they must be enacted into law if they pass. It’s one of the great things about the way CA govt works. The people can overrule through referendum essentially any law (except when the state unconstitutionally removed the secession prop) or part of the constitution. Not all places give voters that much power in how the state is run.

However, unfortunately, drought policy in CA has amnesia and every time we have a massive water year like this year everyone thinks severe drought is never going to happen again. For a state that is so seemingly climate conscious, they’re shockingly blind to the realities that climate change will bring to the state’s water supply. We won’t try to address this until it’s such a severe emergency that people are dying in the street (or even worse to them - corporations losing money! oh no!) imho.
Just the fact that SOC 2 auditors are CPAs speaks enough. I remember working at a large e-commerce company, and the InfoSec offers told me that we didn't care about PCI compliance as we could only get fined, but we could get into orange jumpsuits for mishandling PII. And that was over a decade ago, talking only about names, addresses, emails, and phone numbers. With HIPAA leaks, it's tons more than just that, and I'm not sure what the consequences are, but back then, we didn't want to sell prescription eyewear only due to the HIPAA burden.
German ministers quizzed over nuclear phase out 'deception'
> A board that has Sam Altman on it is going to be much better able to craft safety guidance for the use and misuse of AI than a board that doesn’t have access to such a domain expert.

Incentives. You can't trust a man who makes billions on a this tech to make decisions in the best interest of the nation.

It's inevitable that commercial motives become a factor here. It's well known that OpenAI wants a "moat" and holding back competition with red tape for things they themselves have already managed to achieve before said red tape was introduced is a great way to make that happen.
From the membership I can't interpret it as anything other than a pure industry council.

An AI safety board would be dominated by representatives of grassroots civil society organisations, maybe some labour unions. Almost all of these are CEOs of large for-profit corporations. Altman fits right in with the rest.

If you want a board that actually deals with AI safety, these are the precise wrong people to put on it.

I doubt it's a safety focused council. It seems rather like a council for economically useful applications. If there's any interest in safety it's in the limited sense of making AI robust enough for these applications.
if you’re trying to get an idea of what it actually costs to run a trial, eliminating the cost of drug development seems like exactly the thing to do.
Back when passenger rail still made sense, and was run by private industry, it was great. But it’s been mostly obsoleted by automobiles and airlines. There’s a certain population density where it’s still competitive with airlines, but in the US that only exists between Boston and DC, which is also the only profitable part of Amtrak and would work a lot better if Amtrak could be privatized and focus their investments on that route instead of being forced to run a bunch of subsidized nostalgia routes for train geeks.
It replaced “did you go to a top university” and “do you know our exact stack and tools” as the top hiring practice. Now anyone can compete for the same jobs from anywhere in the world. It’s a leveller, in my mind.

I applied to Atlassian as a 50 year old from South Africa who has very broad and deep experience but has never worked in big tech. Failed at the last interview (of 5) but I found the process and feedback very fair and much better than others I’ve seen elsewhere. The focus was on collaboration and communication and not being a jerk, along with the problems to be solved. I enjoyed it.
To add to my response, it looks very much like TikTok is in fact suppressing specific topics and boosting others in a way that strongly correlates to CCP preferences: https://twitter.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/17839541809708159...
I haven't seen a shred of evidence that these protestors are violent, or that they harass members of campuses, as they are said to do. The unbelievably harsh response from the universities and the state, which included forced dispersion by the police, roof snipers at Indiana University, and threats to call in the national guard by the Speaker of the House Mike Johnson at Columbia, has led me to feel incredibly depressed. I feel that we are reaching a schism in the history of the United States, where liberalism is dying and being replaced by... something else.
C minus minus is needed to strip away as much as possible from C++
You pull the mouse body towards you to move the cursor down the screen, you pull the wheel towards you to go down the page.

The idea that you are touching the document and directly manipulating it and pushing the document up is a touch interaction model. Mouse interaction moves the cursor/view. It’s not “natural” but it’s in accordance with decades of mouse behaviour that “toward your body” is down.

Speaking of, “page down” acts like moving the page up. Mouse wheel down (towards you) matches page down, which is agreeable.
32 bit specifically?

The most expansive Unicode has ever been was 31 bits, and UTF-8 is also capable of at most 31 bits.
If you participate in a public event you can’t really expect to keep that activity secret. (One could also argue that the fact you want to indicates you feel there is something wrong about your actions)

I wouldn’t really say this is doxing, since that usually refers to revealing a private online identity.
(I built the thing)

It's still a bit rough around the edges and technically limited. Index is pretty small too, definitely no straight up replacement for anything, but surprisingly often it provides a useful minority report where other engines fail.
Why? The point is that it's all behavior that causes people to fear for their safety. I could care less if someone is on drugs or a drug user. What I do care about is public spaces being not safe because of the behavior of people in them.
Does anyone know how to get the original oubli fruit/berry in the US? Seems interesting.
"And the relatively elevated levels of lead in certain French wines may result from the wood of the barrels in which they matured, from oak harvested in former red zones."

Okay, so I'm no longer putting French wine as high on my lists.
Thanks a lot for llm, Simon. I've started to integrate it more and more in what I do as an abstraction layer over llm apis.

By the way, do you know of any models that support streaming input tokens to reduce latency to output tokens?
I don't think they are planning to do this; they are at least maintaining support for whatever MacOS (Metal?) and the Nintendo Switch use in addition to Wayland, which suggests to me they are dropping X11 as a hard dependency not as a usable backend.
Couldn't agree more, this podcast is amazing. Worth multiple listens and definitely worth the price of admission.
It’s possible decriminalizing works but it’s also been combined with the absurd no policing of public places at all policy in these cities.

If people want to shoot up at home that’s fine. But there’s no reason we need to have large meth/fentanyl encampments with violent and severely mentally ill people on the streets in addition to that.

If you have too many chaotic policies that build up on each other it’s gonna end poorly as we’ve seen
I use 1Password to manage passkeys. It’s pretty nice. They sync across my devices, I can erase one if I need to, and generally with the exception of something odd with Firefox and one website they just work.