skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you only want your ads next to quality content or on sites that are not drowning in ads so your ad is more impactful, then Google won’t help. But a third party can provide that through their curated list of sites.

Basically they are in the business of providing human curated targeting parameters instead of the algorithm based that Google supplies.
Oh don’t worry. Once dns-over-https becomes standard, you won’t be able to do any dns filtering anymore.
Been using it on all my devices for several years already. It's affordable and very useful.
The return of the 90s is not next up, it's right now.

For the past 2 years, mainstream chart-toppers like David Guetta or Calvin Harris have been (respectively) covering 90s eurodance songs or making new ones in the same style.
Why focus on Tesla then?

All but MB in some super tight scenario (maybe 1-5% of total) are not covering liability.

Why moral panic around tesla? Why each time Tesla is mentioned this forum turns into some fascist bootlickers?
The answer is yes. Software developers themselves have lost the ability to recognize or value efficient architecture. Software architects have been wiped off the face of the earth and replaced by a combination of script kiddies and scrum masters. Fast forward 10 years, we can see the results. Now we just have to wait to see what happens 10 years from now.

Sad for me who wanted to be a software architect. I had to watch all this unfold in real time from inside various companies and never had the ability to fix the problems. Last time I tried to prevent major architectural flaws from being implemented in software during the design phase, I couldn't convince management and had to quit the company... Then 2 years later, from the outside, I witnessed the project turn into a complete failure. They literally abandoned the whole thing and started using a competitor's platform... Which, to rub salt into the wound, is almost just as awful.
Part of the problem is that the main way the government knows how to give people money is through tax deductions. It doesn’t have to be that way. Covid checks demonstrated that grants are possible. That in and of itself would simple things, since there would just be a list of things you can apply for.
[sigh/]

While demonstrating for "Caliphate" may really boost the demonstrators' in-group cred, and imaging some sort of Caliphate may really push their emotional buttons ...when was the last time that any Caliphate-form government actually functioned well in the real world, delivering a reasonably stable and prosperous state, over space and time?

The vast majority of providing decent government, sustained and at scale, is boring details - which you have sustain, at scale. No cool-sounding or imagined-great ideology will magically do that. And the ideologues are usually far more hindrance than help. And for such purposes, it doesn't much matter whether the ideology is Caliphate, or monarchy, or Communism, or Libertarianism, or techno-utopianism, or something else.
New Dockerfile Capabilities in v1.7.0
Java apps are not native on either macOS or Windows.
And the article mentions yet another startup in this space. I don't see any downside to this -- I'd love to be able to get a lot of my protein from a source like this.
Would a prototype based system like Self or JavaScript allow you to attach custom properties and methods to individual instances of Null? That would be so cool!

Nihilistic Oriented Programming is where you don't use any classes, just customized instances of null.
I worked on Adobe’s Flash Player team at that time and I remember using your Flash movie as a test case. :)
Looks generic. The website is very low effort (typos and template text unrelated to your product). Overpriced. Lacking in features. I doubt the legitimacy of the testimony, and your website claims there are far more users than the web store does. Even your images have the extension's name poorly photoshopped in.

What makes your product better (or at the very least not worse) than other products? Why should people (or orgs) use this over the countless other tested extensions? Also, this is pretty niche which makes will make it even harder to succeed.

If you're going to release a product, please put the minimum effort in terms of presentation.
I wonder if a simple MCU wouldn’t be a better option to an FPGA in this case.
Tbh I'm kind of shocked that the PMs overseeing that system didn't have their devs use a fake username.
EVERY? Is a plane with a thrust-to-weight ratio over 1 able to stall at full throttle?
Why are they called twats?
Having to pay a monthly fee in perpetuity in order to distribute an application is absolutely egregious.
You make it sound like understanding the domain is some sort of pontification…
Chained ttys for side-by-side reading
SMES = Subject Matter Experts? (searching SMES/SME mostly brings up small and medium-sized enterprises)
C++ is evolving so much, however I don't understand this thing: why people continue to develop AI projects with Python? I'd choose C++ instead...
Devil's advocate: you now get a lot of tooling for 'free', which used to cost hundreds or thousands of dollars.
How long until someone speed runs Ocarina of Time on an ocarina?
My Hacker News headlines today.

35. AI is making Meta's apps basically unusable (fastcompany.com)

36. AI-powered cameras installed on Metro buses to ticket illegally parked cars (latimes.com)

37. The AI expert who cited himself thousands of times on scientific paper (elpais.com)
Bell Labs, HP Labs, IBM, and some other tech companies also had some of the best tech from their times. They couldn't execute good products out of it and eventually fizzled out. Perhaps that's what we are witnessing with Google.
The way mislead a long time ago when too many projects selected a framework that was way more complex and heavy than what they were solving.

There are some new simplified approaches that are starting to be interesting again.
In the US up until about the 20th century, the government was known to only take loans from the banking system in times of war.
I've been trying Zed today and am thoroughly impressed. Everything feels incredibly well considered, even for edge cases.

A niche example I tried on a whim that just worked: You can multi-select lines (say, the start of every other line, or arbitrary points in the file) and then use Vim commands to apply changes only at those locations.

I'm kind of blown away.
I don't think that users expect developers to maintain packages for every distro. I had to compile ffmpeg lately for a debian installation and it went without an hitch. Yes, the average user is far away from compiling packages, but they're also far away from random distributions.
> they still get to their destination faster

I'd love any evidence of that and I'd wager that that statement is wrong. Blocking the box only accomplishes slowing down the cross traffic with no benefit to the person doing the blocking.
Choosing the web is great.

Choosing overly complex web frameworks is still a guilty pleasure of too many projects.
BMI is actually rather inaccurate when measuring obesity in athletic individuals such as myself.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3445161/#:~:tex....
Much easier to just eat vegan cheese and not have to think about this stuff.
I'm pretty sure that was changed by South Dakota v. Wayfair[0]. Most states seem to only require you collect the tax if you have 200 shipments into the state or $100k in revenue because going after a small time out of state e-commerce business over a few dollars of tax probably wouldn't be worth it but a large firm in Delaware refusing to collect tax on shipments into California would probably be hearing from California's government.

If you're shipping overseas, you can probably ignore foreign taxes if you don't have a business nexus there. Especially if you have no desire to ever visit those countries. Basically just leave it up to your customers to pay whatever tax they owe.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Dakota_v._Wayfair,_Inc.
Is there a tool that already does this? If not, what would be the best architecture for building an event driven chain of ttys? What would be the biggest difficulty?
He didn't map anything.

He wrote a book, that's it.
Security features should be free or a lot cheaper. But compliance? Heck no. Customers with compliance requirements are the ones with some group demanding they prove that they're adhering to numerous (sometimes contradictory) policies. If they can afford to create all that red tape, they can afford to pay to comply with it.
I tested it on https://sapo.pt and the output file characters seem to have wrong encoding, e.g.: Influencers e alimentaÃ§Ã£o saudÃ¡vel: â€œEstamos
Someday I need to procure a VT oh Wyse capable of Tektronix graphics to serve as a reference for a project I’m doing, but they aren’t easy to find on this side of the Atlantic.
Does the fact that the government controls most road infrastructure in the country make you concerned about freedom of travel?
Funny how the landscape never changes, even though the generations come and go.
Really I feel the opposite way, that none of today's models or anything foreseeable meets the hazardous capability criteria. Some may be able to provide automation but I don't see any concrete examples where there's any actual step change in what's possible due to LLMs. The problem is it's all in the interpretation. I imagine some people will think that because a 7B model can give a bullet point list of how to make a bomb (step 1: research explosives) or write a phishing email that sounds like a person wrote it that it's "dangerous". In reality the bar should be a lot higher, like uniquely making something possible that wouldn't otherwise be, with concrete examples of it working or being reasonably likely to work, not just the spectre of targeted emails.

I've been actually thinking there should be a bounty for a real hazardous use of AI identified. The problem would be defining hazardous (which would hopefully itself spur conversation). On one end I imagine trivial "hazards" like what we test models with today (like asking to build a bomb) and on the other it's easy to see there could be a shifting goalposts thing where we keep finding reasons something that technically meets the hazard criteria isn't reall hazardous.
Ever since I tried -ftime-trace in Clang to improve build times in a project a while ago, I've been very conscious about using forward declarations wherever possible, however I wish we had proper module support that actually worked well, having to keep this in mind whenever writing new code just so your project doesn't take forever to compile sucks, this shouldn't even be something we have to keep in mind in 2024.
I had to look this up:

Rob Pike’s rule is that header files should not include other header files; they should only document which other header files they depend on so programmers can directly include those other header files in their .c files.

https://bytes.com/topic/c/answers/217074-rob-pikes-simple-in...
Thanks.

It's great tool.

But I'd like to for xAI.
I think if you're not willing to manually verify the output of these generative machine learned algorithms, then you probably shouldn't present them to somebody as if you've done them the service of a free code review.
Wouldn’t sending a postcard with amount paid in taxes the same effect without causing everyone pain?

The only thing anti-taxers need for their project is awareness of taxes paid, which can be done without needless pain.
Oh yeah, that's the default. Everyone I know im ediately disabled that and I even forgot about it till now
Yep.

It's a measure that makes perfect sense for conventional electricity production: 10,000MW of aggregated coal generation can hypothetically produce 10,000MW more-or-less indefinitely, as long as it keeps being fed things like fuel, water, and maintanence.

But it doesn't make any sense at all, by itself, for energy storage: A net 10,000MW battery might be able to produce 10,000MW, but for how long can that output be sustained? Unlike a group of coal plants, it absolutely cannot do this indefinitely; at some point, that battery will become completely discharged.

It takes at least two figures to describe a working bucket of energy (whether that bucket is Lithium cells or pumped storage or whatever): The capacity (megawatt-hours is a fine figure here, and units like Joules also work), and the maximum input/output (and plain megawatts works fine for this part). Using only one figure doesn't really describe anything at all.

I don't know when or why we stopped doing this, but it's misinformative in a way that leads to a bad generalized understanding of the these concepts with the populace that is actually paying for all of this stuff.
“Since the Napoleonic Wars” paints a dire picture; surely war in Europe and global badness are related!

One might instead use “since the Industrial Revolution”, “since we started abolishing the global slave trade”, or “since the smallpox vaccine” to assemble a sensational attention grabber.

My hemorrhoids haven’t been this bad since the last Cicada brood cycle! Do I need insecticide, or preparation-h?
>On another note: C++ compiler should by default keep statistics about the chain of #include's / parsing during compilation and dump it to a file at the end and also summarize how badly you're re-parsing the same .h files during build.

Clang does offer something very close to this, and if you use it you'll find parsing the same/duplicate header files contributes on the order of microseconds to the overall compile time. Your article is from 1989, which is likely before compilers implemented duplicate header file elimination [1], but nowadays all C++ compilers optimize the common #ifndef/#define header guard as well as #pragma once so that they entirely ignore parsing the same file over and over again.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Once-Only-Headers.html
I certainly learned by sight-reading at a very young age, but was taught phonics in kindergarten and first grade (ages 5-7, roughly). It was a bit of a slog, especially at first, when I was asked to sound out simple words when I already knew them. But it paid off in the end; my mother had also learned to read prior to formal education, but never had formal phonics instruction. She struggled throughout her life with pronouncing more-complex words that she had never heard before (though she was comfortable with their meanings). I largely don't.
I'd love to learn more about anyone using mono repos for small to medium projects.

This article is also 5 ish years old and I would hope some of the tooling for bigger orgs has started to make it downstream since then.

As parent comment mentioned, scaling welcomes teams to work on tooling.

A mix of Gitlab overall with some Gitolite to manage access to certain branches of the repo if needed seem to be one way to go.
That's funny.

"Maintain one source of truth" is exactly what I mean by "DRY".

The question I ask myself constantly is "if this had to change, in how many places would I have to change it?". If the number is not 1, I consider it a "bug in waiting".

This is fairly simple for data. For code it can be more complex, but it's really about that same question. Is some algorithm changes, will I have to change code in 2 places?

I've seen people mistakenly bundle together similar code in the name of DRY like OP says, and it's an unfortunate thing. I recommend asking "the question" if you're unsure!
The article is an ad: "*** provides uptime monitoring and flow-based monitoring for APIs."

This is an important subject, thus it's one for which clickbait is generated.

Size is a problem. I look at my Rust compiles scroll by, and wonder "why is that in there?". I managed to get tokio out, which took some effort. The whole "zbus" system was pulled in because the program asks if the user is in "dark mode". That brought in the "event-listener" system.

Lately, "bash" in a Linux console has become much slower about echoing characters. Did someone stick in spell check, or a LLM for autocomplete, or something?
I like the idea at least of the late Dave Gingery's books: start with a home-made foundry, progress to a lathe.

I don't think I could suffer the janky gimcrack I would come up with though — I suspect even the bargain Harbor Freight lathes would put mine to shame.
This idea seems to be cloned everywhere now, so something is causing the popularity
I once had the opportunity to use a genuine Steinway full-length grand piano which had been fitted with a MIDI input and actuators. I connected it to the output of a Kurzweil K2500 I believe it was, and I used the arpeggiator and sequencer on that to trigger the grand piano. The Steinway became a different instrument. It was not obvious! It was easy to make it sound like a mishmash.
when you use tensorflow from python you're basically using c++
Your airplane can also be in the "experimental" category, which generally means "homebuilt" so the stall speeds and characteristics can only be determined through test flight. I made the decision to empirically demonstrate stall speeds on the very first flight of my homebuilt, before attempting to land, so I knew for sure what they were.
The blog is flawed. 33MB is likely no problem for the web. It's just that Google Docs devs haven't cared about that size probably because hardly anybody creates a huge doc on their platform. Or maybe his dad created a complicated doc file that G Doc failed to parse.

That's different from us devs losing efficiency from our deployment platform.
Do they?

I see people use Watts and Watt-hours and mix them interchangeably all the time. Even people who absolutely know better than to do that.

But the two units mean very different things, and either unit can be used to describe one aspect of a battery.
Yep, one of the basics I do now is a Docker compose with the DB, additionally it tests the migrations.

There's little to no point in doing mocks if your logic is not really complicated where you would need to separate testing it from the integration test.

I think a lot of people took "TDD" a bit too much to the heart and it ended up maligned where always more tests == better.
That's awesome, really looking forward to seeing more about PySheets!
I wonder if Ollama will or plans to have other "Supported backends" than llama.cpp. It's listed on the very last line of their readme as if the llama.cpp dependency is just incidental and a very minor detail rather than Ollama as a deployment mechanism for llama.cpp and gguf based models.
I think it’s just a typo and the author meant to write “doesn’t stay attached.” In a stall the flow detaches: https://youtu.be/3Ahtc-uePY4?si=CPvBpZwx2YbPLFb3
OK, this is a direct quote - you are forgiven!
Jeffrey Ventrella – Vestibular Bipeds
>These people want to steer away projects from being involved in the military

Then they don't understand what free software is.

Not surprising considering these people are primarily activists and software is merely means of gaining personal power in another space.
Think also about all the finished stand-alone applications which have been discarded because of replacement APIs, or because they were written in assembly. We had near-perfect (limited feature-wise from a 3-decade view, of course) word processors, spreadsheets, and single-user databases in the late 80s/early 90s which were, except for many specific use-case additions, complete & only in need of regular maintenance & quality-of-life updates were there a way to keep them current. They were in many cases far better quality & documented than almost any similar applications you can get your hands on today; so many work-years done in parallel, repeated, & lost. If there wouldn't be software sourcing & document interchange issues, it would be tempting to do all my actual office-style work on a virtual mid-90s system & move things over to the host system when printing or sending data.

Addition: consider also how few resources these applications used, & how they, if they were able to run natively on contemporary systems, would have minuscule system demands compared to their present equivalents with only somewhat less capability.
Most people do not make a car payment every month of their lives. They’re usually 3-5 year loans.

The average amount of a car payment and the average amount an American pays in car payments in an average month are vastly different stats.

Contrived example: I buy a $20k car. $500/month payments, 0% interest for simplicity of the math. I keep it for 20 years.

It cost me $83/month on average to purchase. My car payment was $500.
I think it is good and honest for companies to acknowledge that the current incentives work against trying to achieve [SOME_GOOD_RESULT], as in that case the first step towards getting that thing done would be figuring out how can we change the money flow so that there would actually be motivation for companies to direct their R&D efforts towards that.

If the society says to manufacturer "if you do this, you'll get less money from us" that is effectively the society saying "please don't do this". People and governments vote with their wallets about what they want, and if they're "voting wrong" or ineffectively, then they need to change what they pay for, instead of being surprised that they don't get what they disincentivize.
especially if you just buy a single pro license and keep it across all your pc upgrades. i havent paid for a new windows license in years and all my copies are legal, dont keep nuking and buying new keys and its not expensive
Most of my current applications have been opened since the computer booted (11 days ago). Where I'm drawing the line is wasting resources and time while I'm using them. As you said, mostly about user interactions and scrolling because UI is bound to IO for some reason. I remember all the big software taking time to startup (Adobe's, Autodesk's, even Microsoft Office's), but once they do, it was pretty smooth unless you launch that computer/gpu intensive operation. But now, things like Slack causes the computer fan to scream.
I guess Tennis for Two is not exactly digital.
Trial starting this year and listed on a stock exchange meaning there should be lots of good info disclosed ! Cool thank you
Drugs sell really good yet we have laws against that. Maybe some regulation on what a car company can sell would be good.
There’s plenty of battery being deployed for ancillary services in Texas (frequency response, 30 minute, etc).

They are getting paid tons to do it and it’s been coming online for years.
That's likely impossible as all easily accessible coal and iron ore are long gone.

Maybe if you have access to scrap metal.
It's a fair question. Honestly, I don't know. Will give it some more thought.
I really don't think you're being skeptical enough.

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/gaming-us-patent-...
Because they're python libraries that just wrap C and C++. All the performance upside with better ergonomics
You can get insurance that will cover you when driving some one elses car, and you can get insurance that covers some one else driving your car. Wether either of you have such insurance, is a good question to ask before lending your car to some one.
Maybe you are talking about something different but isn't price frequently negative across much of the southwest during the day?

https://www.caiso.com/TodaysOutlook/Pages/prices.html
Tangential: I'm currently planning to create a set of GPX files for trail skating around my local city, including a description of the skating surface, traffic, safety, etc. to give an idea of how what experience level is recommended.

Skating is a great way to see the same local places from a very different perspective (than my usual driving through without paying any attention to anything other than driving / getting to the destination).
Isn't most of the PGE charge transmission not generation?
Damn. What region are you in timezone-wise?