skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
They were the same system, but iPadOS has seen quite a few updates that were specific to iPadOS in recent years and didn't get all of the iOS updates. Therefore I would say that they are different systems, even if they stem from the same system similar to how different Linux distributions are different operating systems even though they have lots of similarities.
This is correct. I added dunks exactly once, and the following years the predatory insects and frogs have done the job. I do regular spot-checks for mosquito larvae and haven't seen one in years.
I don't even know what Java 6 means. Last time I wrote something in Java it said Java 1.5

compiled Java class data, version 49.0 (Java 1.5)
Imagine if instead the driver had to concentrate on something like, possibly, the road, and then not fall asleep of boredom. IMO this is one of the bigger issues with these kind of systems, they bore the driver while still forcing him to take the responsibility
Not to be a pedant, but I see you are completely nonplussed about all this.
However I could see a paradigm shift towards standalone apps if there was a proper language or C++ mod increasing its usability and easiness, AND there was no pressure to do so much on cloud-based.

Also interoperability I guess is a problem (html really IS a consistent UI for every platform)
Another Brit confirming this understanding of the word (although I just found out about the original meaning about a minute ago).
I’m nonloled about this situation.
Bird flu in US cows: is the milk supply safe?
> the driver will have to deal with the knowledge that they killed an entire family by accident

Do you think the term "accident" accurately describes what happened? In that particular case, the driver of an SUV was speeding on the wrong side of the road, ran onto the sidewalk, and struck the family and the neighboring library.
This is mistaken, Grimrock is realtime. I just booted it up to confirm; I don't even see an option for a turn-based mode, which would be handy, because the game is quite challenging and without deft and constant repositioning you'll quickly become spider food. :)
It may happen but your timeframe is too short. A lot of people can't even afford cars that are less than 10 years old.
Personally, I've come to realize that capitalism, communism, socialism are simply semantic pits that don't really mean anything. If you say these words to people they have wildly different interpretations of their definitions and the arguments that arise from this discord are usually both heated and pointless.

Words are meant to communicate things, if they aren't communicating your intent then why even bother using them? While they still have some vague relevance from a historical perspective, like when discussing the cold war, I think any contemporary discussion where one feels the use of these words might be necessary would be better off just listing their ideals directly instead of falling into this semantic trap.
Life ends at 24
I mean by that logic, no top level logic will justify a cut of all revenue.

They want to be feudal lords, requiring us to pay a tithing for the privilege of selling something to customers.
You are literally nonplussed.
I purposefully and unapologetically try to refer to everyone as "they" these days. A person's gender is rarely relevant (and can often lead to stereotyping), so I see no need to mention it every time I refer to them. And it makes life a lot simpler.
What provides protection for a 3A cable plugged into a 15A outless?
In the EU a lot of driving assistance systems are already mandatory for new cars today [1].

[1] https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/50774/attachments/2/... [pdf]
npx extension create my-extension – zero-config web extension development tool
Your timeline makes no sense.

Cars last 25+ years, so ~20% of people will be driving at least 20 years after self driving gets perfected and then standardized.

Insurance companies raise and lower their premiums in response to risk. You might get a discount for self driving car eventually, but people who keep driving will just keep paying the same reasonably affordable rates as they do now.
Königsberg!
I would say it's an excellent entry level split ortho keyboard, but it's quite large. Later you can go to a 50 key one or lower.
I'm not a literal pendant, but you have to admit it's a nonplus.
As a non native English speaker, it’s my first time seeing or hearing this word.
I'm not sure either. I definitely remember occasionally feeling a distinct "flow" feeling the first few years I was studying and working. But now I still have periods of similar and superior concentration, but it's not accompanied by any extraordinary feeling.

I'm not even sure nowadays if I really experienced this, or if the feeling is just nostalgia.
> Imagine if instead the driver had to concentrate on something like, possibly, the road, and then not fall asleep of boredom.

In monotonous structures (e.g. long alleyways, long straight roads through nowhere) humans already have that problem - boredom tires them out.
I think measures like this one are basically intended to push the problem elsewhere. Make it someone else's problem.
In the field of AI, AGI has always been 20 years away since the '70s and that continues to hold true today.
"The packages" are the "the files describing how to go from source code to an organized filesystem hierarchy containing the useful portions of a particular piece of software". That's the good part of nix, much like it's the good part of the Arch User Repository (AUR), and the BSD Ports system.

I think the people who think the nix language is the valuable part are trying to save it, not fork it. But that's a generalization.

A fork would be able to use nixpkgs even if it didn't use nix-the-language itself, with some careful planning for migration.
Funnily enough, as a non-native speaker, I always thought "nonplussed" was a kind of Orwellian newspeak (like "doubleplusgood").
But also particularly in a lot of fields.

One problem in niche areas is that sometimes there are only so many people working on a particular problem and only so many different papers/authors to cite.
Ever wondered if those are cold e-mails they send and by "unsubscribing" you demonstrate that the e-mail really exists?
>but the zoom software will not install because apple forces them to require a newer iPad

I have an iOS app on the AppStore that supports iOS 9. Noone is forcing Zoom to require newer iPads or OS versions.
The one that shocks me is that 300,000,000 Chinese retire in the next decade.

This is going to hurt. No way the fed can stop inflation with these demographic trends.
I periodically wonder how quickly this would end if the costs shifted to the telcos who currently see it as a profit center. Imagine if reporting a message got you an immediate $1 credit and they had to recover it from the network which originated the spam: how quickly would they be able to turn on egress filtering?
The problem with that - the same problem layouts like Dvorak have but worse - is that I sometimes have to use other computers. Any custom layout will be great for me - once I put forth the effort to learn it of course, but since it will only be for me nobody else can use my computer (This computer I'm using now I don't care as only I touch it). However I have computers that others in my family also use, computers at work where sometimes I share a keyboard. All of that becomes impossible and that negative is greater than any potential benefit.
Having medical issues and no way to pay for them?
Wasabi Wallet-Developer Blocks U.S. Citizens After Samourai Wallet Arrests
I had the same conclusion after evaluating those open source PaaS tools.

It just doesn't feel right for me. For small scale apps it's enough to spin up one or two VMs and run some containers with docker-compose (or just use Vercel/etc for a few bucks). But if it should scale, there is no alternative to kubernetes in the open source world.
Compared to not doing fancy forms and partial refreshes?

I know, I’ll let myself out.
Brace yourself for longer. I used to think 2030 would be the year of starting common FSD. Then I moved it to 2035. Then I realized I'll probably retire before it happens, and it became largely irrelevant topic for me.
I always knew it as perplexed. I eschew this inferior recent meaning.
What Thucydides thought about historical analogies Essays
How do those clones work? Are they asics, or microcontrollers/fpga's which do emulation?
No cap, fam.

Seriously, I think a lot of what drives these conversations is that people get a bit emotional about what are really somewhat randomly-formed preferences.

However you first encountered the usage of a word will likely heavily influence what you think of as the 'correct' definition, unless you work to overcome your bias by actually studying the etymology and comparing it statistically against current trends. Obviously very few peeps will be down with that noise.
The fact that this 1930-era additional meaning is being described as "new" makes me think that there might also be another meaning of "new" that I wasn't previously aware of!
> Mistake it may well be, but the fact remains that this sense of the word is in widespread use today, and may be found often enough in well regarded and highly edited, publications.

I would say you are most likely to find this usage of that word in well regarded and highly edited, publications.
unfortunately, many (like me) don't have time for going down k8s rabbit holes, we just want to get back building features.

push heroku, done, get back to other things.
disagree, it is a good keyboard but the thumb cluster is not ergonomic. There is better, especially if you are up to build one yourself with a kit. Otherwise the voyager is already an improvement over the moonlander.
It is indeed one of the most grotesque language design errors C++ did early on.
Intel Hits Bottom in the Datacenter – Maybe
"However, this flexibility seems to be primarily used by language/framework implementers themselves. Not by application developers."

Yes, but the question is whether that is because it isn't any good for application developers or because application developers are unaware that it is an extremely useful idea, and if done properly, doesn't even carry that much marginal cost.

I work primarily in imperative languages, like most people, but almost all the code I write now I separate into an "IO driver" and relatively pure code that uses the driver as a parameter. Like, everywhere, in every language I use now. The proximal reason is that testability skyrockets when you do this, because what makes tests hard is typically the intermixing of these two concerns. When you isolate them they are almost always vastly easier to test in isolation from each other, and this even contributes to integration level testing higher up.

I say it isn't that expensive because once you get over an initial period of practice and learning how to do this, the difference between (in some random psuedocode)

func DoUserInput():
x = userInputLine()
y = bigPureComputation(x)
outputResult(y)

and something like

interface IO:
inputLine() string
outputResult(string)

func DoUserInput(IO IO):
x = IO.inputLine()
y = bigPureComputation(x)
IO.outputResult()

type RealIO:

RealIO.inputLine = inputLine // the global version here
RealIO.outputResult = outputResult

really isn't that great; here you see all the overhead front and center but at scale this tends to be less of a big deal on a percentage basis than this would imply, and it pays off immediately in testability... yes, what I wrote implies that bigPureComputation must be easy to test, but now I can provide drivers that allow me to essentially push that purity up into DoUserInput and test it as if it were a pure function, because when I combine that with a testing implementation of IO the whole DoUserInput+TestIO essentially does become externally pure, even if you can look on the inside and see things like input being consumed and such. Testing RealIO is also easier because now it's all broken into its component pieces, and of course at real code scale all of these little snippets can expand into arbitrarily complicated and otherwise difficult-to-test functionality.

In my toolbelt, this technique is basic, fundamental, and desperately underutilized by application developers. It is sooo easy to write code up front in this style and such an amazing pain to refactor into it after the fact. Doable, absolutely, but an amazing pain.
Don't worry I'm sure there are a good number of native English speakers who've never come across it either. It's not exactly in common usage.
You were around in the time of Shakespeare!? Wow, what was it like back then, hearing the Bard himself use the singular they?

<https://archive.is/A8h4J>
Premier League signs multi-year deal with VR developer Rezzil
"Babe, we have guests, whom we use the fancy relative pronouns with."

Don't make me delve any deeper into pedantry ("with whom we use...")
Moi non plus
Collins dictionary is my go to. I avoid Miriam Webster. Unfortunately MW appears to have won the SEO wars.
Do you also never support going to the hospital because your fever hasn't hit 40C yet even though you tick a bunch of other boxes and are nearing that temperature anyways? The thresholds are meant to be a cap, not a floor, and that's perfectly easy to support. Also worth noting it takes ~half a year for things to get going so if you wait until the exact moment to start things that's ~half a year the law would be ineffective at its goal.

The quote about businesses and gaming is in reference to businesses as the producers of apps trying to reach customers, not as the consumer themselves.
People keep listing wealth, but the wealthier people are the less kids they have...
You should watch people driving with 12.3.5 FSD. Plenty of videos on YouTube. I'd say it's already safer than an average human driver.
Yeah, I just struggle and struggle... How did you know that's my approach???
So your solution would be to fine tune the LLM with new knowledge? How do you make sure it preserves all facts and connections/relations and how can you verify during runtime it actually did, and didn't introduce false memories/connections in the process?
Keep on allowing them to be called FULL SELF DRIVING(tm), and this will keep happening
Agreed, but I don't think it needs to be perfect to be useful enough to be mandated. I would suggest a mechanism whereby a car would be able to identify whether its driver is no longer in proper control of the vehicle (e.g. asleep) and then assess the road conditions, and if it isn't confident in its ability to continue self-driving to the designated destination, it would self-drive into a safe stop. I think that on its own could massively reduce road accidents
Yeah, the plan is to snuff out the indigenous people there.
Of course you can use it.

What you can't do is deny others the same freedoms the license grants to you.
Seatbelts and backup cameras existed for decades before they became mandatory. Fully autonomous driving systems do not exist and are not likely to for many years
Those are my questions and thoughts, too. The chapters so far are very good. I would definitely pay for the e-book.
That would be a good idea.
Show HN: I built an app for architects to design design tile patterns
neoneofetch when?
Discomfort noted, but I think it can work in either case. Pronounced your way, it’s the proverbial teat of knowledge for LLMs.
Lost of labor hours are the real answer.

Basically what would happen was that someone would write it down on a paper form, mail that form off to the typing pool at the corporate headquarter where some clerk would then type it into the central system with a delay of 5-10 days from point of sale to recording into the inventory management system being totally normal, leading to a lot of overstocking and waste.

So to run offline would mean getting a hold of a lot of people that aren't there anymore in addition to reintroducing all of the risk(and fraud opportunities) that running without real time access to centralized data.
The idea here is to click instead of type, but to me, the terminal is about not using the mouse in the first place. Same reason I like vim over vs code
Before the age of 2 you don't need to book a seat. You can book one on every airline I flew with when my son was <2 at least. A child under two needs to be on the lap of a parent during takeoff and landing but can otherwise use a seat. I flew with my son first time when he was about 3 months old, and we had a seat for him because it made it a lot easier.

In this case, she did book a seat.
Obviously it is in the West in tech circles where everyone is introverted and they work 14 hour days. The protestant work ethic has decimated society and all that matters.
Also, even if there was some advantage to doing so, i'm not sure how animals could see a wavelength that short. They would need a photoreceptor protein which can absorb photons of that wavelength and turn them into some sort of chemical change which can trigger a signalling cascade. That protein would have to have a pair of molecular orbitals which are h * 148 nm apart. What can give you that?

The ethene double bond absorbs at ~165 nm, a benzene ring at ~180 nm, and building things out of those tends to increase the wavelength, not decrease it. 148 nm is single bond territory - could you have a chromophore which uses photons of the right wavelength to break a bond, and then somehow react to the presence of free radicals?!
That's not an interesting story though. We always had tired/drunk/reckless drivers, and we accept having death and injury due to those. But we don't accept death/injury due to poor FSD, regardless of whether on average it is a better driver. There are several reasons for this a) self driving cars don't have a personal interest or "skin in the game" in avoiding accidents. Only business reasons are involved. b) It's new tech. We accept old risks, but not new ones. Just like we'd never accept the consumption of alcohol or tobacco if it was invented today, regardless of how dangerous they are compared to other substances. They are bad enough to be banned as new tech, no doubt.

So self driving cars need to not only be safer than human drivers for acceptance, but significantly safer. They might be, and especially further into the future when the number of human drivers is smaller and there are good protocols for collaborating among self driving vehicles. But while they are the novelty the stories will look like this, and for good reason.
The Wikipedia OOP entry seems to have its "Criticism" section removed(?), but there has been a lot of anti-OOP sentiment (primarily in favor of functional programming), including here on HN. On example linked from Wikipedia: https://thenewstack.io/why-are-so-many-developers-hating-on-...
I totally get nonplussed confused with notplussed:

!i++;
In 2015 I went for dinner with a guy who worked on one of the big self driving projects, and he assured me that we'd all have FSD by 2018.
Why is a large retired population inflationary? Retired people tend to be downsizing, and consuming less.
Happens all the time, those split second sleeps that destroy peoples lives.
As others have also said, the first thought when I saw 8 commits was "Oh, seems like a toy project". Only after surfing a bit around the code I saw it's more serious. Is your intention to also transform this into a platform like Vercel/Heroku?
> By the early 17th century nonplus was being used as a verb, with the meaning of “to cause to be at a loss as to what to say, think, or do.” Then, as now, the word is often encountered in its participial form (nonplussed), with a meaning that is nearly synonymous with “perplexed.”

I never knew this meaning - as far as I remember I've always interpreted it as some form of "unconcerned" / "that's not relevant to me". I guess by outward appearance "at a loss for words" and "unconcerned" are kinda similar, even if the cause is different, which is why it's always fit well-enough in context.
They're obtained via the eBay API. A cronjob runs every few hours, filters them a bit, and outputs them in a structured format for the app.
The word "Open-Source" is misleading and should be removed from the title.
Why irrelevant? Having access to a robust self-driving car when I retire sounds like it would be really useful to me.
> It had been a rough day, so when I walked into the party I was very chalant, despite my efforts to appear gruntled and consolate.

> I was furling my wieldy umbrella for the coat check when I saw her standing alone in a corner. She was a descript person, a woman in a state of total array. Her hair was kempt, her clothing shevelled, and she moved in a gainly way.

> I wanted desperately to meet her, but I knew I'd have to make bones about it, since I was travelling cognito. Beknownst to me, the hostess, whom I could see both hide and hair of, was very proper, so it would be skin off my nose if anything bad happened. And even though I had only swerving loyalty to her, my manners couldn't be peccable. Only toward and heard-of behavior would do.

etc.

- Jack Winter
No Web Without Women
The New Face of Flooding
> people (or llms I suppose these days). But that's not really realistic... In practice..

In practice it's trivial to avoid llms and stuff for such simple tools, `tool -h` is pretty often more than enough. This isn't your generic git cli monstrosity

> small syntax differences are not problem

And this discussion is not about small syntax differences, so this isn't relevant. I was talking about your ability to guess a command because that's the command you use in another tool, e.g., use "install" and not get an error because there is only 1 "correct" way to "add"

> bigger problem when I read the docs and see five similar commands and need to figure out if they are aliases, if there are some subtle differences

or "figuring out" could be as big a problem as simply reading a 5-word sentence till the end "install ... [aliases: i, a]", so this makes no sense as a general point.

> and if one of those is the canonical choice.

why would you care about canon instead of using the one best for you? If in your mental model apps are (un)installed, so you always use `tool u/i`, why would you care if the author thinks add/remove is best?
On a tangential note, one of my pet peeves is the way that many people (mostly Americans?) pronounce words like "processes" as "process-eez".

Words with Greek roots that end in -is or -es generally use the -eez suffix. e.g. analysis -> analyses; thesis -> theses

In the case of Latin, it's -ix or -ex. e.g. index - indices, appendix - appendices.

There are of course exceptions and outliers (suffix -> suffixes; octopus -> octopodes!?), but words like "process" and "bias" do not fall into the categories mentioned, so there's no reason to use the non-standard "processeez" and "biaseez". Unless - IMO - you want to sound like a snob... Think about it - how does one pronounce words like "successes" or "princesses"?

One could argue that language evolves - this is true, but in general language evolves to have simpler rules with fewer exceptions rather than the other way around.

Stop, let's all try to stop the madnesseez.
You seem to imply that Google won't have a Python team... Google replaced it with a cheaper (and quite likely worse) alternative. They are still going to do the same thing (at least they believe so). They aren't changing direction or anything like that.

It's unfortunate that we'll likely never know what was the actual reason they decided that the old team was... overpaid? overstaffed? overly something else?

Saving money on workforce isn't the most sound business decision. After all, workforce is what generates the revenues. If you buy cheaper workforce, you should be getting ready to also lose some revenue due to quality drop... well, in large brush strokes. Maybe, in some situations the product was overpriced and making it cheaper by lowering the quality does make financial sense... Hard to tell.
Consuming less than they generate?