skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not yet, but I imagine at some point it will. Open source, much like the oft maligned Thanos, is inevitable.
Anyone created a meta-policy called "Windows 10 UX" or even "Windows 7 UX"?
Hi,

Is there a way to request items that were submit get removed? Can you provide a way to contact you such as an email address? There wasn't one posted on your site.

It's just a suggestion, I mean right now anyone can submit anyone's videos without their consent or ownership verification. How do you plan to handle that? I'm sure there will be folks out there who wouldn't feel comfortable that a site will be scraping their video content attempting to generate a large network of pages on 1 domain with loads of SEO terms. It provides a conflict of interest with the original creators. This conflict of interest is around SEO competition, reducing views from original creators and then there's the other can of worms of any future plans to monetize your site through subscriptions, paid features or ads where you'd be profiting from the content of others without their consent.

I posted one of my videos just to see what would happen and then it created a permanently hosted page on your domain with an AI generated recap of the video. I didn't realize that was going to happen. There was no warning, label of how it works, TOS that I agreed to or options available to make it private and there's no option to delete it. I put in the URL, hit submit and that was it.

It's nothing personal and I hope you don't see this as a deterrent. I'm all for building cool things and generally openly share almost everything for free (I've been blogging and making videos for ~9 years and don't have a single ad on anything I ever posted) but the idea of having inaccurate AI generated content does rub me the wrong way.

> The guides are generated from pure transcript so you don't have to worry about it being AI.

You mentioned it's generated from pure transcripts but most of the phrases used aren't what was mentioned in the video. It looks like a paraphrased version of it but it's also missing all of the details that would allow someone to follow along.

Directly under the video on the page it says "This response is AI generated". One one hand you say it's not AI generated but then on the other hand it is.
And same for Emacs, great LSP and DAP integration.
A coroutine is a computation that can `yield`, suspending itself and passing control back up to the caller. It can then be resumed at the caller's leisure.

An function with an effect (in this sense) is a function which can ask a handler to `perform` some effect for it. This suspends the function and passes control to whichever handler is in scope for that call, allowing that handler to resume the function at its leisure.

I suspect that you're misunderstanding what is meant by effect, because despite buzz about them and backend support for them in OCaml 5, they aren't yet implemented with syntax and type-level support in any mainstream languages I'm aware of.
If they did or didn't is up for debate, but I'm pretty sure scorched earth was their goal from the start (specifically targeting the giants, Google and OpenAI). They don't want to be #3 in this race.
That's not what I meant. The company can (and should) share the share price with you as a new joiner. That helps you value the stock compensation.
Something something law of headlines... No. As much as I'd like for this to be the case, it's not.

I think proprietary models will gradually become less popular, though, due to their lack of consistency and control.
The Second Cold War Is Escalating Faster Than the First
Building open models is a very strong approach to cornering the market on top tier AI researchers. And as other commenters have mentioned, the raw models are not the product - the vast majority of the value is in how they are integrated into useful products.
In my town we have standard Xfinity for cable and now quantum fiber and Ting Internet laying down fiber. It increased our choice from single ISP to multiple ones.
Conroe (Core_2_Duo) was after Netburst (P4); next leap was Haswell; and current Intel CPUs could be considered as significant enhanced Skylake.

So, if Netburst gen 7; Conroe gen 8; Haswell gen 9; Skylake gen 10.

Also exists separate branch of Bonnell (Atom), which is based on CMOS old p5 core and have totally different from desktop line generations.

And I don't consider MMX and Netburst as separate generations, but as dead end branches. If consider all dead-ends we should be over 20.

AMD have significantly less number of generations, I think Ryzen could be considered something like k-11.
It's directly in the right click menu. It's an icon that looks like a cursor. It looks like what happens when you rename a file. It's also in the More Options menu if you prefer extra steps. Doesn't sound like you do.
while cost of living and general production increased

This is a major problem! Why ? Corporations chasing profits without enough competition ?
Is there an index that ranks companies by their benefit to society? Something like amount of taxes paid, number of employees, benefits, environmental impact, etc?
The key point being it's created more jobs so far but we cannot extrapolate the same thing if AGI comes up tomorrow. Like let's say open ai comes up with a new LLM that is capable of replacing a human in let's say software development. What new jobs would it create?

All technological advancement so far has created new jobs because you need someone to actually work on it, like a chip factory or doing devops. As far as I can see an AI is general enough that you don't need much effort to specialize it and with how things are currently going, only a few players have the capability of building and deploying it.
I was hoping for more detail in the post but it really just a seems like a quick and easy way to attract eyeballs? Never heard of the platform, and I cant help but think that the logo is a rip of the old okta brand.
Hmm, I'm studying first year biology at uni and they convey a lot of wonder with it. Especially when at the same time you study human bioscience (organ systems, tissues etc) and chemistry for biology the sheer wonder of all the little machines working together effectively by random collisions comes off as magical.

I just wish we had a better way to see it. Some sort of approach that would allow us to observe molecules in real time :| An electron microscope of some very dead extracted material just isn't the same.
While trying to cough up more details about this, I discovered https://bolinlang.com/faq#:~:text=One%20issue%20we%20have%20... so it seems the skunkworks site design is a thing. I especially enjoyed the "cloud company stol my shit" vibe
> I've never seen it

It is indeed rare... because cities are typically allowed to arrest the people who do so. It's only in cities dominated by the idea the homeless are helpless victims who can do no wrong where you see needles and feces, like SF.
What's Going on with VinFast?
More like because of the non-necessity of supplying a livable wage.
IMHO, the Lisp Machine experience is completely different. Those have zero educational aspects, they were designed to write large, and stateful, applications, where the Lisp Machine OS is the big stateful object-oriented operating system (like Symbolics Genera). Interlisp-D is even more different.
Yup. Same.

I find this super interesting and its nice to hear others experience this too. My brother and I both seem to have very early memories, so I imagine it's something genetic.

I have recited very specific events to my parents that they were convinced I was too young to remember. How and where my crib was placed, how and where my diaper was changed. That time I pissed myself in the bookstore, etc. I also have very vivid memory of staring up at the ceiling from my crib in the middle of the night. While my heart was pounding, I wasn't crying, it was just this pure awareness that has stuck with him.

One of my craziest memories was the first time I went on a playdate without my parents. I was about 3 - maybe 4 years old. I was sitting with this kid I barely knew, and he turned up the music really loud and starting dancing. I started having what I would now classify as a "panic attack", but I wasn't necessarily "scared", instead it manifested more like a psychedelic experience. I remember closing my eyes and seeing dancing colors. I remember asking him "Jason, do you see the colors too". I was so confused. It wasn't until much later in life when I tried mushrooms that I put the pieces together and concluded I was experiencing synesthesia induced from hyper arousal.
I think I would have personally liked to have seen less small towns, and more major roads.
If your product is an AI model (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc) you can't give it away for free.

If your product is a social graph w/ ads (Meta), you can.

It's hardly corporate charity:

* Meta releasing these models creates an improvement and tuning ecosystem around it, giving them access to tons of free developer time.

* It's also a strong recruiting tool, for engineers and researchers frustrated by, e.g., Google and OpenAI becoming increasingly closed. They know they can publish at Meta.

* The cost is insignificant. Meta had 30B in revenue just in Q2 2023.
At least, up to Haswell (including), Intel CPUs was each leap.
If I didn't need to open the terminal to disable basic nags on MacOS, I would be more inclined to agree. Modern MacOS post-Yosemite approaches Windows 8 levels of pointless service-oriented integrations.

On Windows and MacOS, you are the frog no matter what you do. The water is at different temperatures, but they are both heating up pretty fast.
I feel strongly that the future of media content will be a search for human authenticity buried under an ocean of generic generated content.
Zuckerberg's reasoning on AI/ML seemed very justifiable to me in the Dwarkesh podcast

IIRC,

- Having a better model is a competitive advantage in fighting against spam
- Better models enables facebook itself to understand their code vulnerabilities, better employee productivity etc.
- Being in the frontier of open source, keeps them at an advantage in terms of updates from community
It has the best version of minesweeper, where every board is solvable.
Yes, within the context of the "conversation" I was pointing out examples of why a required "enter your Ivy League history here" box might push away famously successful subset of startup founders.

You could argue YC wants people that wouldn't be discouraged by that. I'd argue that due to survivorship bias that would be hard to quantify, and that YC is competing with others for the best ideas so they might just end up somewhere else.

To expand a bit; I wasn't actually discouraged.. I was more put-off and slightly offended. It did make me stop filling out the co-founder match in the moment, but I was always planning to swing back around on it.

There is a trend I notice where people just drop low effort argumentative responses. They aren't even fully realized counter arguments. I try not to engage when they are targeting me; it's better for a third party to shut them down. It's super bad on Reddit and unfortunately ruins r/dotnet .
It seems the domain fritz.box has been suspended. March 5 was the first time this message got captured on archive.org[1]:

The Domain Name you have entered is not available. It has been taken down as a result of dispute resolution proceedings pursuant to the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS).

The fritz.box name servers also point to URS[2] name servers:

Name Server: ursns1.viagenie.ca
Name Server: ursns2.viagenie.ca

[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20240305162200/https://fritz.box...

[2] https://www.icann.org/urs-en
I don't know your background, so I don't know at what level to pitch an explanation. Here's an attempt that assumes some knowledge of modern PLs.

Effects require 1) well-defined control flow (think of IO; you need to know in what order output occurs) and 2) manipulation of control flow (think of error handling or concurrency).

We can model effects as a back-and-forth between effect handlers, which carry out effects, and the user program. The user program passes control to the effect handler to carry out some effect, and the effect handler passes control back to the user program (potentially a different part of the user program; think error handling) when the effect has been performed. Continuations give complete control over control flow, so in their full generality effects require continuations (or some equivalent like monads). Coroutines are a slightly stilted form of continuations, that you can model much, but not all, control flow with.
My experience with high school biology was similar, though that might have been that particular teacher. He was close to retirement and while he could have identified most plants in the region, he could not answer most of my questions about biochemistry.

I found that the first semester of biochemistry at university alone changed my understanding of biology. The quality and depth of the education was so much higher than what I had in school before. A large part is of course that it is so much more focused, you could not go to that depth in a general purpose school education.

It does go again in a different direction later. Once you learned the general principles you might have to learn all the inconsistent details that are present in the actual biological systems. And the immune system is certainly one of the worst offenders here. There are a lot of really fascinating aspects about it, especially how it adapts and learns. But you quickly get to a points where you're just overwhelmed by the incredibly amount of different parts that play a role in it.
Most of us will be dead in decades.

What I mean by long term here is more than two or three years.

> So the company's shareholders might only want the term to be just long enough to cash out.

Which means they need to sell to people who think the business has enough of a future for them to cash out. That stretches the terms a bit, but not long enough from the point of view of employees, customers, or what is good of the economy as a while.

Depends on the composition of shareholders too. One thing I recall from my time in investment management was the problem of clients who were reluctant to sell because it would create a capital gains tax liability. At the other extreme are fund managers whose most pressing concern is where they will appear in this year's performance league tables.
No problem, and we appreciate your moderation.

However, this wasn't an obvious case of "linkbait" and it's from the New Yorker, a respectable publication known for its evenhandedness and scrupulous fact-checking. And the original title is accurate as stated. Jonathan Haidt really does want parents to take their kids smartphones away.
Given that withoutboats is a long-time major contributor to Rust, I suspect they titled the blog post with the audience of regular readers of their blog in mind rather than a more general audience like Hacker News
Well if you don’t have a pretty good idea of the problem you’re solving for the customer, you’re much better off trying as many things as you can, quickly and cheaply, to figure out.
10 shots facing the wrong direction still gives 10 guaranteed misses. At least make sure which cardinal direction the target is in.
They spent much more on metaverse
> You just had bad teachers. The subject is all at once beautiful, bizarre, fascinating, daunting, mysterious, majestic, labyrinthine, and awe-inspiring.

This. I'd say it applies to a lot, If not all subjects.

In my experience teachers rarely explained, why we need the subject, and what's it's use. Now I see myself digging thing on my own, and realising how cool a lot of subjects are.
As long as businesses have proprietary processes, there will be proprietary models. An open-source AI cannot know everything.
Scam Calls and Messages Took over Our Everyday Lives
"Well hello there. It is I Bill Anderson"
"How good to see you all".
"A year ago we got rid of middle management, and it is a huge success"
"Sadly, we need to cut another 1000 jobs, but we all understand that."
"my private jet needs to be replaced and I need a bigger bonus"
"Now you need to self-organize and pick the 1000 coworkers who wont be
co-workers anymore.
"You will have 30 minutes or organize and remember this is a flat structure".
"Also what do you think the severance package should be?"
"It will be financed directly from the remaning workers' wages."
"We wont have anyone like evil HR make these decisions anymore now you can do it yourself".
"BTW this (carnage) will all be streamed live on Hulu where watchers are already placing bets"
Ask an LLM.
You make me feel a lot better about my skill set!
> You won’t hear me argue the NY state legislature is not deficient and/or corrupt.

What makes you think that’s the problem? The NYC school system, for example, spends $38,000 per year per student. Thats about triple what Japan spends per student. What else can the legislature do? And do you think the NY or NYC legislatures are any more corrupt than those in Japan or Germany or Sweden?

To me, the problem seems to be the workers running who are running the system, not how the system is designed on paper or how it’s funded.

> pushing back against monopolies writing their own legislation to kill competition is definitely a part of how we begin to fix it.

How does that follow? Say you defeat this legislation and NYC adopts community broadband. Will that system be fast, affordable, and reliable? That seems like putting hope over experience.
At the beginning I thought I'd find the same info as in a .plan file (discovered while reading Masters of Doom, where John Carmack explains what he's working on). It would have been super cool !
Unfortunately, your page looks more like a #buildinpublic twitter page which is not really insightful.
Good luck with this project.
This is one of the motivations of algebraic effects: you can have fine grained control over which effects are allowed.
I heard someone say gdb works great with emacs but I never had a good experience with C++ in neovim. I asked friends and they all say they use a second editor to debug which is part of why I bothered to do this
My problem with the line of thinking is that you are addressing a today problem, But not thinking long enough about the problem you’re about to create.

The market, the amount of money we’re talking about, the amount of influence that is a hand… It’s not going to go away because we passed a regulation or two.

I don’t think there is any solution. I certainly don’t think that one solution would come from government. However, a multi approach explaining what these companies are doing, and some regulation and some pressure put on their actual customers, the advertisers, might move the needle.
> It’s not debatable; we have over 200 years of technological development to look back on and the trend is clear: the total number of jobs has increased at least as fast as human population growth over that time.

That isn't some immutable law of the universe. 200 years is a short sample size relative to geologic time.

Once we have robots doing the cooking, cleaning, heavy work, etc., what becomes of the Waffle House and Walmart worker? There will be a lower bound capability threshold, and automation will eventually exceed that.

I think a smart comparison would be to look at what job opportunities are available to the intellectually disadvantaged.

Then what happens when that lower bound inches higher?
Most people don't know about the group policy. Also, it's a constant battle - today you disable this thing, tomorrow they add something else in an update that you have to disable again. Or it may not even by possible to disable on the Home version.
The specialization has certainly taken off - people are much more specialized in their jobs now whereas “farmer” was really a jack-of-all-trades with passing capabilities in many different skill sets.
It is unknown now, what will really be in future.

I think upcoming Intel CPUs will be hybrids of Skylake fast cores with Atom (whatever) energy-effective cores.
Do those phones do this even on alternative photo apps?
I'm not an electric car fan at all, but recalls happen all the time. The cyber truck is something entirely new so I wouldn't expect something like that to just be flawless.
I hear you. When I was younger I used to try and convert everyone around me (if you want X, do Y). Back then it was personal finance stuff.

Now I just don't bother. My conclusion is that it's just some form of depression, learned helplessness, whatever. There are an infinite number of reasons why you or they are a special case. I don't let it get me down any more.

For what it's worth I don't think my lifestyle is at all "hardcore". I have a number for calories and protein that I try to hit, and I have numbers for lifts and cardio that I try to increase. That's it. I have a car, I eat fast food, I drink on nights out etc.
The corporate charity will not dry up. AI makes it easier to generate content, and Meta's in the business of facilitating the sharing of that content. Content is surface area for ads. AI will also make the virtual realities of the "metaverse", as defined by Mark, easier to reify. It's also a giant marketing and recruiting strategy.
I remember pytorch has some pytree capability, no? So is it safe to say that the any-pytree-compatible modules here are already compatible w/ pytorch?
That's like the farthest I've seen goalposts move within a span of two comments. You went from "essentially unfirable" to simply "harder to fire" and continues to act like you're so right. Like it's almost pointless to discuss something with someone who pretends those are even close to the same.
Be careful what you wish for. Humans tend to do poorly when they have a lot of leisure time. Especially young people, especially males.
It is unknown now, what will really be in future.

I think upcoming Intel CPUs will be hybrids of Skylake fast cores with Atom (whatever) energy-effective cores.

More detailed explanation on link:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40108990
>this is not my first rodeo. I can turn off most of this junk. Most people will never bother or won’t know how or won’t realize that it’s optional. They’ll just learn to tune it out, mostly.
No. Biology is unique in the sense that life is the creation of God and is far more complex and awe-inspiring than any other subject.
As opposed to the private industry, famously meritocratic and never hiring friends, family, and insiders?
> 53% of Americans own publicly traded stock, but that means that 47% do not

Does that include 401(k)s and pensions?
Only if you have Windows Pro, for Home (and similar) users, gpedit is missing/unavailable.
Every big new tech category in recent years has quickly matured into a duopoly of a closed, proprietary, premium option and a mass market, public, "open" one. OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Amazon, Microsoft and a ton of other players are battling for the #1 option, but Meta has cleverly theorized that #2 is going to be easier and a better fit for them.
Was that the one saying, "you would expect a large generation to be poorer than a subsequent smaller generation because of more intragenerational competition, but actually the larger generation can use politics to favor themselves precisely because they are more numerous?"

https://youtu.be/PkJlTKUaF3Q

The situation is even more extreme in places like Italy where the young are even less numerous compared to the old than in the UK.

It's the political equivalent to deflation. If every generation is smaller than the last, you end up with a gerontocracy and no-change society. To maintain pro-growth policies, you need a critical mass of young people who embrace change and want to grow. Otherwise you get stuck in a positive feedback loop of more and more power and money concentrated among the old which depresses the birthrate.
There's ESG. But that comes with its own challenges.
Much of the "smarts" is in the camera app itself, not in the OS support for the hardware, as far as I understand it, so no it shouldn't. That might be good or bad depending on your perspective.