skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You just move the sorts around, you don't get rid of having to have sorts. I guess a rug with dirt swept under it is more aesthetically pleasing than a rug with dirt on top of it?
Whenever the EU forces US companies to do something, we get collective outrage on here. So I was wondering: Can we get some collective outrage for this as well?

Otherwise I can just conclude that there's a double standard about this kind of thing here.
Jsfxr was originally developed by Eric Fredricksen:

https://github.com/grumdrig/jsfxr

I maintain the sfxr.me fork which adds some quality of life improvements, and pro.sfxr.me which brings cloud saving, sound packs, and other features.

Eric is also the creator of Progress Quest, the original idle game!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progress_Quest
can you share details of the weather station please? ive been looking into gathering wind data on the cheap...
That is definitly an idea, see npm packages.
It's definitely "Americans" that did this. It came from the hubris of seeing the Soviet Union fall and deceiving ourselves that we were living in some capitalist liberal democratic end of history and letting the political system make decisions to match.

And frankly, attempting to not "socialize accountability" and instead pin the blame on some othered corporations would have the effect of fostering a helpless outlook in the face of those corporations.

IMHO, the way forward is to realize the collective mistake and fuck those corporations good and hard as part of the correction (e.g. lets make an example of Apple).
I have no experience with Tesla and their self-driving features. When you wrote "chill" mode, I assume it means the lowest level of aggressiveness. Did you contact Tesla to complain the car is still too aggressive? There should be a mode that tries to drive exactly the speed limit, where reasonable -- not over or under.
Have you taken a look at Masonite Framework's ORM [0]? It's an implementation of ActiveRecord. I'm not sure why the framework [1] doesn't get enough attention though. I think it's a nice option for projects that have outgrown Flask but aren't keen on Django.

[0] https://orm.masoniteproject.com/

[1] https://docs.masoniteproject.com/
They can keep the company, just not in the US. Furthermore it really depends on the price. If I make an annual profit x that is expected to grow to y eventually, then I would certainly sell you that company for 100 * y. Maybe even 10 * y.
Yeah “Reinforced learning with compiler feedback” in addition to RLHF.

For that reason I suspect that Rust could do pretty well in terms of its writeablility by an LLM, but there's the problem of the relatively small training codebase in the wild which make LLMs perform quite poorly in Rust at the moment (Llama3 70B being far worse than even ChatGPT 3.5 on that, but even ChatGPT 4 can't write nontrivial Rust code right now). So it seems hard to even bootstrap the process.
A bit off-topic,

But I just want to raise awareness that currently it is impossible to get 60fps for a canvas in chrome on MacOS without dropped frames:

https://www.vsynctester.com/

I have tested with an M2 Air and an older Intel MacBook Pro.
I think this is related to this bug report (open for many years) but I am not sure:

https://issues.chromium.org/issues/41136434

One might say MacOS users use Safari most of the time, but sadly it is not possible to get a pixel perfect (or at least not wildly off) canvas if a user changes the zoom settings:

devicePixelRatio does not change on zoom as it does in other browsers and I believe the spec.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Window/devi...

This is a decision made for accessibility reasons on Apples part, but I can’t find the quote on that anymore.
Alternative mechanisms to size the internal resolution of a canvas correctly are also not supported on Safari.
Makes it harder to skim since it breaks the structure, this best be a toggle (and smaller indent would help fit more)
He's not leading the polls:

https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/president/general/202...

Please vote.
Not much. But if you just want to adapt/optimize hyperparams, this is a useful approach. So I can certainly see a possible, less technical audience. If you actually want to hack and adapt architectures it's probably not worth it.
Kagi gives you significant control over how their search engine works for you. One of the options is to search non-commercial sites.

https://help.kagi.com/kagi/features/lenses.html
My guess: They are hoping user feedback will help them to fix the bugs later -- iterate to 99%. Plus, they are probably under unrealistic deadlines to delivery _something_.
I was thinking the same the past few days.

Going with fastapi and sqlalchemy, there is no django admin and no user management out of the box.

But writing serialisers for DRF feels dated.
It all depends on your use case but a lot of people seem to be in agreement it fell off in the mid to late 10s and the suggestions became noticeably worse.
the benefit of complicated is that it filters out the people who suck so they can't fuck up the code
I have an aversion for paying for artificially scarce things. I am happy to "pay for software" if that software doesn't exist yet, and what I'm actually paying for is the labor to make it.
You got it to work? For me it complains about some header files missing and breaks the nuitka installed on the system.
>I do not believe you owe anyone anything just because you published a project, and you have the contract to prove it. However, I take issue with the “leaving and taking my toys with me”,

You said it yourself. They owe no-one anything - the toys are theirs to take home. That anyone might think continued access to his toys is a right just smacks of entitlement.
As a EU citizen I don‘t care about any collective outrage on HN. It‘s not even a question of standards, it‘s a question of power and I‘m happy to see that the EU has enough power to pass these kind of laws.
You can use "favorite" for this, which is less spammy.
9 is also a ideal voting number for a state switch between interested, neutral, fleeing. A octopus having voter deadlock with 8 brains would freeze up in some scenarios.

> You can't really trust people smarter than you, right?

You can not. They are out to get you by means of hacking parasitism. Then again, society is the biggest game plan, and when a large part of society votes for a parasite purge, howling and screaming it all goes. Game theory and free market noises non withstanding..
I do agree, I think mostly car manufacturers are gonna make something worse, but it would be nice to have some more competition on the market as carplay and android something are also not good.
There are a lot of indirect subsidies going into air travel. To me this has always seemed rather perverse, and the money should have been invested in proper rail infrastructure instead, from a climate standpoint as well as for convenience (a proper rail network deposits you in the middle of a city without the need for a car, you don't have endless security controls etc.).
4 TFLOPs is significantly faster than your CPU. Even 1.35 TFLOPS represents a reasonable edge. The question should be why Intel added another processor instead of extending AVX.
The one thing that has kept Microsoft afloat is their business oriented part. They are deeply entrenched in any company that needs to use Office and only ever hires Windows admins who won't even look beyond Windows. That is pretty much every non tech small to medium company. When things were shifting to the cloud they were smart enough to make sure it would be their cloud, locking customers even deeper into their own technology.

Anything else they do is a bonus.
We've lost the romance of letter writing in the digital age. There are a few diehards still trying, but I imagine climbers these days send and email or a WhatsApp message. It doesn't have the same power unless someone took the physical effort to put pen to paper somehow.

If, for some odd reason, we lose access to the archives of tweets, YouTube videos, Facebook updates, etc, there'll be a giant void in the history of what people did in the past 30 years. It's ironic, because while we have those things we have far more access to what people thought than we've ever had in the past.
> A package manager is a core OS feature

It has become a core OS feature. Historically, you see the set of core OS features expand tremendously. Back in the 80’s drawing lines and circles wasn’t even a core OS feature (not on many home computers, and certainly not on early PCs), bit-mapped fonts were third part add-ons for a while, vector-based fonts were an Adobe add-on (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Type_Manager), printer drivers were third party, etc.

I think that’s natural. As lower layers become commodities (try making money selling an OS that only manages memory and processes), OS sellers have to add higher layer stuff to their products to make money on them.

As to Sherlocking, big companies cannot do well there in the eyes of “the angry internet”:

- don’t release feature F: “They don’t even support F out of the box. On the competitor’s product, you get that for free”

- release a minimal implementation: “They have F, but it doesn’t do F1, F2, or F3”

- release a fairly full implementation: “Sherlocking!” and/or nitpicking about their engineering choices.
Correct. Like I said, they are not wide spread. Only a few cities while remote monitored.
> fixed-cost universal construction (it only takes fifteen gliders to build anything buildable)

Here’s the Hacker News discussion from when this was discovered: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33797799

Dave, I’m still regularly blown away by this discovery. I don’t know what else there is to be said, but do you have any other comments regarding this?
The UK's record-setting locomotives were pre-war. The HSTs were only a moderate increment over the existing "deltics", but it gets much harder to add that extra bit of speed for true high-speed rail (and there's no real evidence that US steam trains ever achieved 125mph, even though 100mph+ running was routine on some routes).
Lightweight Django (2014) [0] actually explores using the Django framework in a similar manner.

[0] https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/lightweight-django/9781...
Shouldn’t this be exactly like the bluetooth integration? It’s just a defined protocol for basic functions like start, stop, play etc. so similarly stream any Apps from your phone with basic commands? I am happy to limit myself to a large google maps screen and the rest is control of my entertainment like I do today (open the app and then control via bluetooth).

By this we have no vendor lock in and just making sure there is a protocol downwards compatibility…
If you like tech, and like learning, I would suggest investing time with more information-dense media than video.
Not yet. It’s mostly full of insults directed at myself so would need cleaning up first :)
No, that’s a half ton class truck (f-150 comparable). A 250 class truck (f-250, 2500, etc) is a 3/4 ton class and is what you need if you want to tow >10k pounds while having basically any load in the truck.
No, Lean is not suitable for axiomatic investigations, it comes with too much baggage from "classical foundations". As Randall said above, Lean is axiomatically much stronger than NF, and that's even with "no axioms"! You can use Lean to prove things about axiom systems, but you have to model the axiom system explicitly as a "deep embedding" with syntax and a typing judgment. For metatheory work like the one reported on here this is exactly what you want, but if you want to actually work in the theory then it's an extra layer of indirection which makes things a lot more cumbersome compared to using Lean's own logic.

Metamath is much more configurable in this regard, you just directly specify the axiom system you want to work in and there is no special status given to first order logic or anything like that.
A famous counterexample: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saccharin#Warning_label_additi...

> However, in 2000, the warning labels were removed because scientists learned that rodents, unlike humans, have a unique combination of high pH, high calcium phosphate, and high protein levels in their urine.[36][37] One or more of the proteins that are more prevalent in male rats combine with calcium phosphate and saccharin to produce microcrystals that damage the lining of the bladder. Over time, the rat's bladder responds to this damage by overproducing cells to repair the damage, which leads to tumor formation. Since this does not occur in humans, there is no elevated risk of bladder cancer.[38]
No, it is not blatant "North American and Western European bias".

I am Bulgarian, living in Bulgaria, a small country in Eastern Europe. My native language is Bulgarian. I also know English, Russian, and a little bit of French and Turkish.

I do not want to write, or read source code written in Bulgarian, or Russian or French, or Kiswahili, or Japanese etc. I want to use one single language for that. It currently happens to be English for historical reasons.

Supporting unicode in source code, will lead to language fragmentation, and will limit my ability to participate, and to understand everything already build by others.
or, your oversimplification misses all the nuance and the difference in the situations, and they're in fact different situations, so the difference in reaction is warranted.
It's so nice. Just a simple .yaml file to configure IoT devices. And it works really well.
Not that I'm advocating for either side, but how do you know they were referring to Israel unless you agree?
> Or when they didn't show 3 unskippable ads in a 5 minute video.

On desktop Chrome, a modern ad-blocking browser extension will block 100% of YouTube adverts. I haven't watched one, literally, in years. I don't watch YouTube from a mobile phone, but I think the situation is different. (Can anyone else comment about the mobile experience?)
>It would be catastrophic, because Congress as it stands is utterly incapable of legislating.

Congress is very capable of legislating about something that's relevant to their interests: look how fast the TikTok ban was passed.
Am I missing something or is there no sample code...?
Definitely will sign up. Thanks for showing me around today!
One of my favorite projects in all of FOSS. The only big thing missing is power management!

I just wish there was a little more native hardware. I wonder if there's enough interest to do a run of PLC-like units?
Dove into this when I flashed my AirGradient device. At first I had a hard time understanding how everything integrated together (does ESPHome need a hub? how does HomeAssistant work with this?). After (mostly) figuring things out I discovered how powerful it is to have configurability ranging from OTA updates to MQTT support.

My only gripe right now is the lack of documentation and confusion on the HomeAssistant side. The ESPHome addon turned out to be a red herring for getting everything set up.
When this stuff happens to me, I try to imagine that people accidentally tapped the down arrow, because it is so close to the up arrow.

Enjoy my upvote!
You said you hate the industry, so I have to assume you want to build a business. Unfortunetely, people don't pay for programming skills. They pay for you to solve a problem or to entertain them. In essence, to get better at programming, you'll have to build products and solve the problems that come with them. Too many bugs? Learn testing. System crashes at night? Better monitoring, logging, etc. Features take too long? Better architecture. Algorithms and programming exercises are the easy part, productizing something, running something in production is the hard part. There is no book, course, or other material that can give you the understanding of what it means to build production-grade software. You can read countless stories on how you should write your code (clean code, TDD or whatever) and how you should operate your production system (DevOps, IaC, containers, and so on) but will this really apply to you? Doubtful. Start small, fix problems and fail a lot to learn what the true painpoints are and how to solve them. I met a lot of people who just tried to follow "current best practices" without any understanding as for the reason and the result almost always way a horrible moster of an architecture that fell over at the first sign of trouble.

Everyone with experience has their own style and preferences. For example, I like to write very defensive and modular code because I really hate chasing down bugs or getting up at night due to a production failure. Most people I meet don't like my code because writing code with that much test coverage and deliberate APIs takes time, so day-to-day I have to make compromises, but I will always push in that direction. Others push in other directions because of their own personal experiences. As long as there is communication, the end result is always worth it. However, if you were to follow only my advice, you'd likely become terribly locked in and think that programming is terribly boring. So don't listen to me, gather your own experiences and use learnings from other people to supplement your view of programming, but never let their view replace yours.
Of course there is a double standard. As nuanced as your view of the US might be, everybody has to admit that the US doesn't has an exaxtly great track record of sticking to rules they expect others to uphold, be it about trade, democracy, human rights, etc.

A bad side effect of the enorm economic and military power of the US.

But then again China has a way worse track record when it comes to banning US/EU social media companies on their turf.
How can you have written two whole articles on the tool and not mention the most important data point in the title/first sentence: size before, after, delta?
I think you are on something [0], but then again, more poison is more bad.

[0] https://www.cuspuk.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Plastic-Pi...
For visual content we'll need some kind of screen, of course. But I don't think this will be in the form of a rectangular slab we carry in our pockets, where we use our fingers as input. It's much more likely that it will be in the form of lightweight glasses, and eventually contact lenses, or if we get to that sooner, directly in contact with our visual cortex. It's scary to think about today, but we'll get there eventually.

As for input, think about how slow, clunky and imprecise touch typing really is. I'm typing this on my phone right now, and it's still infuriating. And this is after more than 15 years of perfecting this technology. This is just the best it's ever going to get.

Voice recognition OTOH, if it gets to a state where it's 100% reliable, understands all our accents and nuances, in all kinds of environments, then it's not difficult to imagine it becoming the primary input method. And in recent years, LLMs have made generational leaps in this area to the point where this can finally be a competent option.

You won't need to have a list of restaurants read back to you, or have to have long interactions to book a flight or vacation. This is what the Rabbit device is trying to sell, and they at least have the right idea. The AI will have deep knowledge about you, so that just by saying "book me a restaurant tonight", it will make the right decision for you. At least, that's the idea. I think we'll get there eventually, even if the Rabbit is not the device that does it today.
I’ve been very happy with Django ninja. It brings in pydantic as well so you get the benefit of type safety in addition to a much faster request response cycle as compared to DRF
Is there a less convoluted less enterprisy implementation of such a project someone can point to. I was interested to see what is or isn't so intensive about it. Or is this a good scaffold to start a fork?
I use sounds generated by it for the notification sound and the ringing tone (though I edited it out to include a 5 second silence at the end). I thought about creating an app for that to make it easy for everyone to have simple and completely custom sounds good their phone.
Me too, I'm convinced it has a place - the number of single file projects over the past few years can't be a coincidence.

For me the two missing pieces were models and a path to migrate to a full project once it outgrew a single file, so I wrote nanodjango (https://github.com/radiac/nanodjango/, formerly django-flasky) - you can use the ORM and admin site, and I recently added a "convert" command to automatically break up a single page app into a full Django project structure.

I've been using it for a couple of years for prototyping/experimenting and putting together small apps, and with the new features this year feels like it's a really practical alternative to flask.
Technical Coherence
Leipzig: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leipzig_City_Tunnel

Malmö: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_Tunnel_(Malm%C3%B6)

Proposed lines: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Proposed_rail_infrast...

I can't see a Wikipedia category for recent extensions.

It will very often make sense to connect the hundred year old station to a new major line, but as with Leipzig and Malmö they also build additional stations in the centre of the city.
SQLAlchemy does. I get that DjangoORM is more convenient and might be good enough. But powerful seems like wrong adjective.
Cool that it runs on Amiga. I’d love to see a local store use Amiga based UI for the warehouse. Also the fact it was started as another project in 1994 makes it double cool.
Why don't they utilize them? What's keeping them from doing so? Addiction is brutal, and getting clean is not a simple process of rehab.

Getting clean requires a ton of energy and patience and it often hurts like hell. For someone who is spending 100% of their energy on surviving and managing their addiction, they might not have the reserves to try to get clean.

We need to figure out how to reach them, not write them off.

Also, "I'd rather fund x instead of y" is a trap. We can do both, and we can say the bar is fully funded education and fully funded support for addiction and recovery.
When QOI Meets XZ
Given how much less technical merit the alternatives have it's not credible to claim that it doesn't matter
Which is also a Microsoft created language,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lean_(proof_assistant)
I keep wanting to build a PICS rating service and (humorously) add it to my feeds.

https://www.w3.org/PICS/

The use as parential control is clutter to me. The referring to content selection as filtering was a terrible idea.

The content labels can exist on a different website, they can live in the html document and there is an rss element specifically for it.

You make up your own rating label and put a score behind it. There was an example for example that rated by canadiannes

https://www.w3.org/TR/REC-PICS-labels/#Example

As usual they spend a lot of words explaining something simple.

In its almost most simple form:

(PICS-1.1 "http://www.example.org/ratingservice"
label for "http://www.example.com/foobar" rating (javascript 5 php 4 mysql 6 bloomfilter 10))

Looks a lot like hand crafted weights to me. If widely adopted you could make a fascinating tag cloud from your 100k rss subscriptions.
That's incredible! Looks like an oversight by AVM if they patched it in a later firmware.

I wonder if I can find a device not fully upgraded
Really? Hmm let me check Alire again.