skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
beats only knowing the other meaning: https://www.joe.co.uk/comedy/nonce-finance-responds-to-ridic...
Toeing.
An argument I would take more seriously if infinite scrolling was not a requirement too.
Beyond zprof (https://www.bigbinary.com/blog/zsh-profiling) not really I'm afraid. I did the majority of my zsh-prompt hacking 10 years ago and haven't thought about it since. That snippet could be from anywhere.

You could peek at something like zprezto https://github.com/sorin-ionescu/prezto or pure https://github.com/sindresorhus/pure for tips.

Fetching git/hg/... info is always slow, so try and speed that up where you can (as to how to do that, uhh... I know my prompt has a dirty-state check nicked from pure for speed reasons). You can also cache any `asdf init zsh` or similar to a file and do the same "run in background" trick so the next shell will have any changes.

The biggest improvement I can remember was dropping zprezto for my own much smaller config, I really did not need much comparatively. Mostly some git info and "good default" options. I use zgenom for a plugin manager but only have 3 plugins, probably I should just dump it and inline the plugins to avoid getting owned one day.
Right but the point I am making is that Apple put a hub in tens of million homes without having to convince anyone to get a hub.
A big reason is because it's not possible on the web, and it's worth noting that the kind of visual you see in masonry demos is the most extreme example of what you could do with it. Most of the time it's: I want to fill a page with modules of differing heights where positionality is based on importance not coordinate, without weird gaps where items fall into the same row and constrain each other.
I meant the proximate energy source. Are the organisms photosynthetic? Or is solar energy converted to something else? For example, is PV used to make electricity that then powers the microorganisms (by providing them with reduced metal ions they can oxidize)? Or is a chemical energy source synthesized, say methanol as was used for ICI's Pruteen (although that process sourced the methanol from natural gas)?
What camera thing?
Llama3 running locally on iPhone 15 Pro
Also whatever you do don't break the receiver pathway! Otherwise you will need to send a technician on-site.
I’m excited about a new Apple TV
You just told me that you are part of the 0.0000001% of users and so your point is moot
For awhile it was just described as "Pinterest style."

It has some use cases but for the most part it's literally a wall of unstructed information. Difficult to parse and build any mental hierarchy.

It's also ... incredibly easy to do with existing css.
App live on App Store:
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/local-brain/id6476066730
How I made a 3D Level in a 2D Game [video]
> Firefox masonry... by simply adding a new attribute that collapses grid rows

Not just Firefox, the proposal here is

grid-template-rows: off;
I don’t know how to activate the power using the three colored 3x3 fields…

Edit: The correct symbols are right in front of you when you face the 3x3 fields.
The judge said that the pay package was unprecedented, not the ruling.
$3.5B in tax-exempt bonds is not $3.5B of government money.
Just make sure no one in the UK, Ireland, Australia or Japan gets asked to solve those captchas.
No plastic waste is sent to landfill in my part of the world. Only incinerated, and occasionally used as part of road pavement.
>Avoiding Confusion With Alphanumeric Characters

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3541865/
I would expect most browsers that aren't running JS do not properly handle state of the art CSS extensions.
This isn't a privacy hit, its probably the worst outflow of all time considering its sensitivity. If this isn't UnitedHealth's reckoning then I think the US is permanently screwed because it just doesn't know how to work properly anymore.
Why you can't get a restaurant reservation
I think I'd put the difference between "invariant" and "assumption" as purely a difference in framing. Both describe a problem in communication between two components of a system. Suppose there are two components, where the output of component A is sent to component B. Both components seem to be working correctly, but when run together they are not producing the expected output.

* Option 1: Component A is violating an invariant of its output type. Whether that is invalid data (e.g. nullptr), internal inconsistency (e.g. an index that will be out of bounds for its array), or some (e.g. matrices with determinant one), the output generated by Component A is wrong in some way.

* Option 2: Component B is making an unjustified assumption about its input type. The implementation was only valid when the assumption held, but Component B's interface implied that it could accept a wider range of inputs.

The only difference between these two cases is the human-level description of what the type is "supposed" to hold. By describing it as an "invariant", the blame is placed at Component A. By describing it as an "assumption", the blame is placed at Component B.
As someone living in Germany, I have no idea what you're talking about. Paid public toilets are the norm overwhelmingly here, and even then the offer is minimal. The famous Berlin new main station, while gorgeous and modern, has 1 (one) facility, with 5 or 6 stalls per gender. Many train stations have nothing.
I would be curious to know what the car thought the situation was, something must have gone really wrong here. It ignored the double lines and crossed them to overtake and then stayed in the wrong lane for a really long time.

If the car understood the state of the world around this, this is kind of a huge mistake in behaviour. And if it didn't it is concerning as well as it would mean it can end up in the opposite lane without knowing it. I would suspect maybe a bit of both, that it misunderstood the world when it started to overtake, and then was unable to abort the process safely. In that case I probably would have expected it to stop driving forwards and put on hazard warning lights as long as it is in the wrong lane.
> There are gems coming out today that will be considered great works by our descendants.

Wow. Can't wait for the next Harry Potter / Avatar / Celebrity book / Spiderman movie !!!!11!!!1! Great works!

> but isn't right now pretty amazing too?

No.
For me personally, that's exactly the sort of thing that ends up teaching me so much, so it's very valuable in it's own right.
All publishers are required to supply one copy of any published book to the royal library (for free).

Individual libraries are not required to buy any particular book. They have a fixed budget for buying material and will decid based on quality and expected demand.
My problem with maintaining a changelog during development is it can serve as a source of merge conflicts. Instead, I follow Covnentional Commit style and manually write my changelog entries based on the commits. I have a tool [0] that can show me the relevant commits for a package in my repo and automates the entire release process, including doing sanity checks.

I also feel like releasing from CI is hard, especially if you have multiple packages in a repo [1], including

- You can't as easily introspect the process

- You can't as easily recover from failure

- Getting a lot of the nuance right, like handling releases concurrent to merging of PRs, is difficult

- When the workflow is an ever-present "release PR" that you merge when ready has issues with selecting which packages to release and at what version

I have been considering making a tool to generate changelogs from fragments. Been keeping notes at https://github.com/epage/epage.github.io/issues/23

[0]: https://github.com/crate-ci/cargo-release

[1]: https://github.com/MarcoIeni/release-plz/discussions/1019
No idea what the Waymo car was thinking, but what are these kids riding?

Maybe it thought they were on a bike lane? Where I'm from it's illegal to ride like that in a group outside of police-sanctioned events - you're supposed to ride one after the other and keep right.
Costly assumption.
There are companies whose business model is this but unironically.
To the above posters credit, it sounds like their claim of exaggeration was spot on (he didn't say it was a lie). You didn't say their libraries don't compare to US ones, you said they don't exist.
Training a Vision Language Model as Smartphone Assistant
I will assume this was sarcasm.

So think about this: say your CEO asks you to make a missile specifically to target and kill children. Would you consider that it is not your job to question it, or would you actually think about it? I will assume that you would at least think about it. You would have some choices, then, for example:

- Accept it and keep doing your job

- Raise concerns internally (to your CEO) or externally (to the media), more or less vehemently

- Quit and go do something else

And I assume that for such an extreme case, all of this seems absolutely obvious to you. So let me ask: why does it feel like you can't imagine questioning something less extreme, like working on LLMs or autonomous cars or a connected fridge?

Engineers are paid to think (among others of course, but it is usually a necessary skill). It feels like they could reuse that skill and sometimes think about ethics, too.
SBCL has two evaluators now, sb-eval and sb-fasteval. I don't know how much structure they share. By default it builds with sb-eval, but this can be changed with options to make.sh. sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* is still :compile by default.
You could make that same argument for any parallelism - your CPU queues some inputs and processes them in an arbitrary order after considering dependencies.

There's a long way between hand-writing CPU instructions to make sure it does the same thing between runs, and the other extreme of writing a terraform yaml config and letting the engine decide how to get there.

Excel is so far from SQL/YAML that I can't lump them all together as "declarative". "Column from examples" comes to mind as a more declarative Excel feature than formulas in general.
When are we going to admit that the current level of understanding and technical capabilities are not sufficient for safe autonomous driving?
I linked to a podcast with transcript and scholar-quality research references which answers your question. Here on HN we actually read links in full before commenting. Please ensure you do the same.

You also might want to look into the existential threat of putting high-recycle-cost plastics into landfill where it doesn't do anything (low/zero) vs doing literally anything else with it including recycling (high).
Did the designers of Unix also have to ensure compatibility with billions of devices connected worldwide running different software stacks?

Also as mentioned in the linked article the masonry layout is already possible with JS, no decades-long committee process needed. It's just about standardizing something frequently used.
Good post. It's important to realize when a project isn't worthwhile continuing. It's also important to realize that so-called technical criteria are only one dimension along which usage decisions are made. Technically inferior technology often wins out for other reasons (e.g. Windows vs OS/2 etc.)
I already use this. On Firefox I just enable it in the options and make use of it for my bookmarks. On Mobile this isn't an issue since it's just stacked on top of each other (no about:config on mobile).

The last image has it turned off.

https://imgur.com/a/o7OyZEW
The devices they're riding are called electric unicycles, often abbreviated to EUC.
There is a steady stream of tech books being published.
Does anyone know what sort of advance a tech author can get,
if we leave out the biggest author.
Actually, by looking at the behaviour of the unicycles I could infer that this was a country where people drive on the right and therefore the car was probably doing something wrong?
This lag is one of the most frustrating things of self checkouts. The manned checkouts don't have this. Its bleep, bleep, bleep, one item after the other. But the self checkouts have that damn refractory period after a scan to recover itself and be ready for the next scan. It's also true of any of the other actions like for payments needing sometimes five button presses each with long pauses. Like just have 'Pay Cash', 'Pay Debit/Credit' as two separate buttons and if you hit 'Pay Debit/Credit', the card reader is ready to go. Oh, even worse is when they give voice instructions, but you can't proceed until its finished talking.
Frontier: We Were Probably Hacked
I think, in structural engineering terms, it refers to old natural stone wall [0] construction methods. Some bridges around me are made like this, and they're over a thousand years old.

But I agree that it's not a good adjective because I had the exact same first thought. Both "natural" and "stonewall" would be better, and they're not great names either.

[0]https://duckduckgo.com/?q=natural%20stone%20walls&ko=-1&iax=...
> outdated business model

It's NOT a business!
While your words imply that you have an ideological opposition to telling businesses what to do, and that external effects need to be ignored. Why do businesses have the right to do things harmful to society so that they can make money?
What is your experience with VR? Have you been to the movies in VR? Or played board games with other players? Have you done social chat applications?
CSS may be complex, but you get a huge bang for the buck in terms of UX, rendering performance, flexibility, accessibility, compared to most drawing and layout systems. You could argue against border-radius and flex as well, but Im glad we’re past clearfix and gifs for corners. Does masonry layout qualify for becoming standard? I don’t know.
Yeah I’m wondering if they accidentally have training data from those places and plus that data might be more likely to have groups of cyclists.
Not PCs, but I consider my parents’ network an extension of mine (with their consent, of course). They are on Unifi gear that I can completely remotely manage.
My comment was discussing using the rail for access to the US, not for getting from one ocean to another.
I wonder if that's a positive or negative. How does it affect hallucinations?
And yet it does.

Ever wondered how all those fancy action movies got their tanks just like that?

Cuz they had to beg the US gov for them; they are pretty much free to use under the condition that you do not critize the government's foreign policy or the army itself.

So if you want to make a war movie that is critical of the government, good luck.

And thats just one example; there is much more regarding all the "experts" send on television to talk about this or that country that happens to be at odd with the Washington dictatorship.
I think this is just transposed masonry, the wall looks ok if gravity is on the left. "Transposed" is redundant though, since I assume it will work in both grid-template-columns and grid-template-rows
It’s always been 1984
Is it also illegal to ride into oncoming traffic, in the wrong lane?
Check out Renderlet https://www.renderlet.com/
I built a masonry layout with only CSS and HTML 10 years ago. The site is actually still live. A scripting language is used to generate the HTML and CSS based on the dimensions of the images. But the masonry runs left to right not top to bottom.
Such browsers can also get by based on the semantic ordering of content within the document, which will more closely match the visual reality when a masonry type layout is used. The alternative of defining several columns leads to at least one column being shoved all the way at the end of the document after the previous column, whereas in a masonry layout that wouldn't be the case.

This is where a proper solution to this problem shines: After all, when you are on mobile (at least 60% of your users), they will get a single column anyway. Any solution that doesn't solve for them is a nonstarter.

That being said, it is the slow loading of JS and the folks using truly modern browsers with JS turned off that are more common, and for those people this isn't a problem.
Surely they would not build like this. You want to avoid vertical shear planes.
With big projects, the code will be read and written by hundreds of disoriented devs. Becoming big ball of mud is the main failure mode, by far. Getting a feel which parts of the framework will get in the way requires experience with big projects. I work with Golang, so I can say that strictness, as you call it, definitely wins big.

For small projects, you can use whatever you like and even change it for every new project. Who's to stop you? You say you don't care about benchmarks or strictness, who am I to judge?

Caveat emptor: successful small projects tend to become big projects.
>Had to google “cope”. Let’s try to keep HN a bit more civil.

Civil? What do you mean?

Coping mechanism: an adaptation to environmental stress that is based on conscious or unconscious choice and that enhances control over behavior or gives psychological comfort.

This is a completely civil concept.

In this case the environmental stress is the fact that the Vision Pro is failing. The coping mechanism (or in short: "cope") is proclaiming that this is fine, because Apple is actually just beta-testing the Vision Pro, and it was never supposed to gain wider adoption, so all is according to the plan.
This is what we do for cars now
I agree that the citation does sound cold and coercitive, but actually this is already kind of how streets and urban developments are designed. Human drivers are limited, so if you allow cars to go fast, you restrict or remove the right to be walking close to the road (highways). Conversely, if you want to give more room to pedestrians, you decrease the speed limit, reduce lane width, etc. such that they are able to react accordingly. Nothing wrong with that in principle.

Now, this does not say anything about the Waymo incident. In that case, the car performed an illegal maneuver, which cannot be blamed on other street users.
Nice. How did you build it?
I suspect this is human error rather than a computer error. Waymo is a supervised system -- from what I've heard while there's little remote driving by humans, there is occasional real-time human labelling and confirmation. So the car likely phoned home to ask "what the heck is this?", and a human clicked on the "overtake" button or something.
Out of curiosity, can you provide some examples of these books which are artificially expensive, popular in libraries, but not for sale commercially?

> Also, publishers often lobby the municipality politicians who set the overall guidelines for their local libraries to make sure their books are represented.

Politicians are supposed to set the overall guidelines but not to decide what individial books libraries purchase. Do you have examples where politicians pressure or force libraries to buy specific books?
Nice old-school look
OP may be thinking of Tyndale. He printed the Bible in English for the first time, making it accessible to a much broader range of people. (Gutenberg's was in Latin). That together with the fact that he was executed for heresy leads to an often repeated "Catholic Church didn't like printing press" narrative, but it's oversimplified and unfair. Tyndall was in the thick of the Protestant Reformation, and his execution had to do with his unwillingness to recant certain theological positions and apparently not much to do with the printing.

It remains an excellent example of free information causing chaos in society. The cost of transitioning Europe away from Catholic hegemony - in which widely available English Bibles was certainly a major force - was at least a few centuries of conflict and war, some of which still isn't entirely settled after 500 years. Power transitions, historically speaking, tend to be messy and involve wars. Our own information revolution is not less disruptive than the printing press - I would say maybe more so. So it shouldn't surprise us if we're in for troubled times while things shake out. It is easy to accuse old power of refusing to give it up, and that isn't wrong, but also sometimes that old power was the only thing doing the job of keeping chaos at bay.
The Radiant Future (Of 1995)
And with this convenient domain excuse, CSS has managed to become a system that’s not a fit for any domain.

It’s incomprehensible to visual designers, incomprehensible to programmers, and incomprehensible to document authors.

On the upside, it provides a massive moat of sunk cost and implicit implementation dependency around Chromium, so at least there’s that.
Excellent business opportunity for someone with your knowledge
First we need to admit that the current level of human capabilities are not sufficient for safe driving.
Reminds me of the jaywalking law in the US, brought about by the auto industry.

This law that sets the default of it being illegal to be in the road doesn't exist in much of the world. It's really up to the self driving cars to respect other road users at least as well as a human driver would, not expect to be able to mould the laws around the world to fit their limited capabilities.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26073797
Art direction > technical prowess.
Imagine if in the constitution there was some line like 'the right to use an airplane shall not be infringed' or something and so any attempt at regulating airplane safety was declared illegal. As a result thousands of people died every year in airplane accidents and everyone was "well that's what the founder fathers wanted, so what are ya gonna do?"
October 2025 will be a support massacre for a bunch of Microsoft products
Asks the consent to use the camera of the smartphone I'm using for browsing.
They’ve already survived one apocalypse before, who’s to say they can’t another one?
I feel like in the longer term we'll eventually get, via WASM or otherwise, another language that we're allowed to use in the browser, which can be properly type-safe from the beginning.
It’s paid, and you need to sign up but it’s a non spammy non ad driven app I can recommend https://macrofactorapp.com

You log what you eat and your weight. It then self adjusts your macro targets based on weekly progress. It has the usual free trial period to test.

If you want ideas for meals, self plug https://www.macrosolver.com/.

It’s a small personal webapp I built for myself specifically but host publicly, no frills, no signup, no ads. You put a bunch of ingredients in and your target macros and it tells you how much of each ingredient to eat to hit your macros.

It works best with whole foods where the foods list contains a carb source, a fat source and protein source then any extra ingredients. You will likely need to play with the min/max qtys after initial suggestions to get something reasonable. I use it for creating recipes that hit my macros with stuff I have in the cupboards and found it useful, I’ve created a few I wouldn’t think of normally.

No tips, just the obvious. Strength training and moderate cardio I.e walking more helps with fat loss over endless hours of cardio. Smart watch such as Apple or Garmin can encourage you to be more active and track activity trends.
Fedora 40 is just around the corner with more spins than ever
To be fair, I've seen many human drivers doing equally stupid things.
No matter what that it is not possible to override the law with a license.
Of course if it is outside your local jurisdiction you can ignore but you don't need a license text for that.

If it applies to you it does so regardless of your license. A court would simply rule the terms illegal.

But as others said this will (arguabely) only apply to real commercial activy and in that realm you (usually9 cannot dislaim liability anyway.
> So where is that "Street cred" going to come from

I suppose it is constituted by the same substance found in books that people buy, never read, and proudly display nevertheless.
Finished all levels without falling at once. Great game!
I'm in love with Gamemaker, which got me interested in programming: https://gamemaker.io