skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm independent so that isn't a problem for me. My response was to this mention of the 'credibility' of experts regarding one hospital. Gaza is obliterated. The repeated and deliberate targeting of World Central Kitchen aid workers may have arisen from very difficult conditions and circumstances indeed. Something tells me you're ready to settle atop that bloody soil. 'Educate yourself about the world' gave me a chuckle. Accept that there is right and wrong.
Before even then, when Cliff Burton (Metallica bassist) died in an auto accident, I wrote some physical mails to his parents expressing my sympathy. I forget how I got their address, but regardless they wrote back - by hand! and we had a few back and forth physical mails. Nice folks, and totally genuine.
Not so much in China.

Don't act like they had a choice to make here -- as much as I loathe intensely everything Apple does to appease the Chinese, refusing to act would likely prompt the government to ban them entirely.
Its exactly that.

I recall there are receptors in your stomach lining which detect the presence of sugar even when its not obviously tasteable, such as in predominantly salty fast foods and so. This is a sneaky way to make you addicted while you don't even realize it.
Oh hey, I made this a couple of days ago!

I initially made this to experiment with 'faking' depth of field in CSS (check out my penultimate tweet for the demo vid and inspiration from shuding_, link at the bottom of the site).

But last night I remembered that ThreeJS exists, so rewrote it using react-three-fiber. This was my first time playing around with it and I'm super impressed, it's incredibly ergonomic.

Edit: not documented, but right-click drag to pan
I was just going to suggest this. Click is a great code base to learn form.
Surely it might still work, but training a model into true overfitting territory is a waste of resources. An overtrained model is usually a worse model than an earlier checkpoint. That's the main reason one strives to avoid that.
This one isn’t:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1977_Nestl%C3%A9_boycott
Doesn't this topic come up every five years or so? Isn't it always a big nothing-burger? Numbers can be deceiving - and we are great at fooling ourselves. I'll reserve my interest for actual photographic evidence.
Its like everyone else, chasing profits.

Western media covers it because it is a well known name that has done similar things before and is sells a lot of things aimed at babies and toddlers.
Google is sitting on ~20 years of gmail, but I can imagine the headache of both cleaning the dataset and likely consumer blow back.

They also have youtube, which almost certainly has enough good data to train a powerful model on it's own, but also seems daunting to clean up first.
It practically is poison, it's just the effect takes years to become obvious. Obesity, type-2 diabetes accompanied by all of its implications and effects leading to miserably unhealthy lives and early deaths. I hope there is a reckoning with the industry (and the "experts" and supposed government watchdog organizations lying and feigning to protect us) someday and sugar is treated more like cigarettes with disgusting pictures of people dying on the fronts of cereal boxes.
How to be a great software engineer without using your brain
How is this WhatsApp fault? It's a mere communication tool.

This is like banning phones because robots keep are calling me.
What's more engaging?

"We know the facts. We have it all figured out." Then the facts change years later.

Or "There's a great mystery here, a secret we haven't yet found. We're still looking, but here's some ideas that seem to explain 90% of what we're seeing."

The second is so much more engaging and would promote more interest and science funding.
It would be best for DDG to sell before they are steamrolled from multiple fronts.
Problems with memory chips are there from the first generation of Tesla, number of writes just exhausts and guess what happens with the Tesla car with no free memory.
I was amazed how much my taste changed when I cut out carbs for a month. Sweet things started to become unbearably sweet. The sweetness of a red pepper was fantastic and an orange became candy.
Garbage in garbage out. Lawyers can't make up shit since most don't have a plan B if they're in immigration - it's not the highest paying, extremely specialized, and pretty much requires you to be multilingual. Only some of the skillset translate and much of it requires you to move to DC. Consular processing is less bout the lawyer but really entirely down to how the counselor official feels and if they slept poorly the night before you can get a sudden spike in rejections for no other reason than rejection is easier than approval. But if you really have a bad case, no amount of makeup can cover that gigantic sore in your paperwork, Thiel or no Thiel.
This is a frontend to GPT-3.5 that protects your privacy. This isn't a new model by DuckDuckGo.
Zen and the Art of iPod Maintenance
Nestle is about 0.5% of the MSCI World, the simplest is probably to buy 0.5% by value of Nestle shorts on the side?
Interesting read, but it seems like the grouping challenge could be fairly trivially solved in the application layer by registering job types (groups) with the poller, and having the round robin logic there.
I like the left-foot jab jab jab to induce a slide while still on the power. I've read about other mixed input strategies, but that was the only one I was ever able to pull off to my satisfaction.
Nagging and not up-to-date. Well done.
You're right, I forgot my exponentiation rules: https://mathinsight.org/exponentiation_basic_rules#power_pow...
> No need for pom.xml, requirements.txt, cmake.txt, or any other kind of dependency configuration. It just works.

...until the project decides to switch to another hosting provider. Which has happened more than once in the past; it used to be common to host projects in Sourceforge, for a while Google Code was common, now many projects are on GitHub, and it won't surprise me at all when another forge becomes the popular one. Individually, projects might switch between being self-hosted (in their own domain name) and hosted on a shared forge (using the forge's domain name).

IMO, it's a bad design. It forces the project's repository's location to become the project's official "name", that is, it mixes up location and naming. It's better to have an indirection layer to map the project name to the project location, like most other languages do.
3 body problem side effect?
Unfortunately because of the too low for too long interest rates the landlords building cost them too much which is why their rent is too high.

In any case, there is no reason people cannot put some money aside each month and earn some interest every year. And on top of that the house prices will not increase, at least not insanely as in the past, so you have a chance to catch up if increasing your salary and savings for a few years.
I think that in the belief system of utilitarianism, if one believes an action will save more lives than it costs, then it is justified? (Not sure if that's what went on in their heads though.) If the calculus leans heavily in one direction, then arguably one is killing people by not taking that action (by preventing their lives from being saved).

(In my opinion this article represents a pretty compelling counterargument to that philosophy...)
Except that method also dials 911.
"If you generate code that looks like what the C compiler would do - which passes on the stack surprisingly often, especially if you’re MSVC - then you hit the CPU’s sweet spot somehow."

The FA is mostly about x86 and Intel indeed did an amazing amount of clever engineering over decades to allow your ugly x86 code to run fast on their silicon that you buy.

Still, does your point about the empirical benefit of passing on the stack continue to apply with a transition to register rich ARMV8 CPUs or RISC-V?
Video without RAM contention, for one: https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/q/22257/278

> The 6502 needs access to memory only half the time, during the what is usually called the ϕ2 phase of the clock. The other half of the time, so long as you tri-state the CPU address pins,² the bus and memory are available to other systems.

> The Z80 does not have such a well-defined, synchronous system of accessing RAM. Many cycles don't need RAM access, but many do, and which particular ones do and do not depend on the instruction mix.

> There is no "do nothing" solution to this constraint, and Z80-based systems that wanted consistent video output would have to solve this one way (hardware) or the other (software).
Poll: What search engine are you using?
With the rise of new search engines like You, Perplexity, and Kagi, I'm wondering what the HN crowd is using as their daily driver.
this makes me lean towards the fork even more.
Not for their Chinese users, that's for sure.

Not because they don't want to -- although as an American, I don't see what kind of goodwill this produces -- rather because they can't, the government simply won't allow it.
This is simply not true. As someone who has been gaming exclusively on Linux for over a decade I don't even bother checking for support before getting new games anymore because almost all of them just work with Wine/Proton or only need minor workarounds.

The only things that do give problems (besides new releases which are promply fixes) are some multiplayer games with anti-cheat that intentionally breaks under Linux. But if you support those kinds of games then you reap what you sow.

Proton is also not really magic - it's mostly just Wine + DXVK and while Valve has improved both they didn't start either of them and weren't involved before they became viable. SteamDick is entirely irrelevant here - if anything it has caused developers to not release native Linux builds because of the way Valve does certification (or unfounded fears on the devs side).

> If you want to be able to play any given computer game

Moving goalpoasts much? This is like saying you need to be an american in order to use computers because there are some computer models that were never exported. There are more games than you will ever be able to play which work under Linux, for any genre. For older games it is often even easier to get them to work under Wine/Proton compared to native Windows.
> “Don't you think that the real reason, in this moment in history, is that landlords are colluding on rents?”

The lawsuit that could shake up the rental market [1]

AirBandB

Hedge fund investing in real estate

To name a few

https://www.npr.org/2024/01/11/1197961038/the-indicator-from...
The key thing you end up needing is a clock (along with memory of course, yeah)

I still remember clearly the day I in college read the SICP chapter on simulating circuits and realized how computers work -- a purely functional circuit combined with a clock to govern that circuit so its inputs come from memory which came from the previous state but its outputs go into memory for the next state. Prior to that I always had the same confusion you describe -- logic happens, but how does anything actually progress?

Branching isn't really necessary per se in that you can do tricks to avoid it but essentially accomplish the same thing (differentiable computing leans heavily on this), eg if you want to select A or B, rather than saying `if(x) a else b`, you can say `xa + (1-x)b`
Being DDG, with its reputation, I’m sure these chats really are never saved - but the wording in the sidebar:

never saved by us, and not used to train AI models

could make the more paranoid believe that they could be saved by DDG’s partners - from very directly (Anthropic saves chats with Claude) to indirectly (all channeled through a shady arms-length subsidiary).
Not sure it's still like that, but for a very long time EU required that there is a mechanical linkage between steering wheel and actual steering.
I also really liked Cage of Souls. It seems like most of the people I know who have read any Tchakovsky have just read the Children of Time, and not any of his other prolific work.
Not sure that's true. I have a Chevy Bolt and when those were exploding (lol), it was all over the news. So much so that there are still parking garages that won't let you park a Bolt in the garage.
I wonder how strong that evidence is.

For example: My DNA is probably on my coworkers clothing. Which means it is in their homes, even though I've never been there.
You can still blame the solutions for their problems while acknowledging that they exist to solve another problem...
I use “/Code”.
godfather is bad and violent. but i was enjoying their cluelessness and your insistence.
What's the actual complaint here , other then company A buys company B.
I find the math portions in physics books are just basic refreshers.

I guess if you want to learn math, only a math textbook will actually care.
Mostly you should start by reading what's shipped with core. After that, look at larger projects with lots of committers, as they often end up getting "polished" down to something that's sort of generically useful without being too quirky or too simple, and the architecture tends to be more functional.

Avoid anything developed/maintained by one corporation. In general, their organizational hierarchy leads to bad patterns and resists useful changes that don't conform to the goals and patterns of the business or engineering leads. Grassroots OSS projects aren't always better, but they're less likely to have a monoculture and perverse incentives.
I guess they mean that the chat conversations are not persisted in a DDG database. A bit misleading IMO
I had to checkout your Git after this awesome reply. Gotta love Hacker News.

I had a cool vision for “tag play” … I visualize mini RFID records on a turn table that tell Roku what to play.
I was expecting something where the AI chat could run DDG web searches. If it's just a mirror of GPT 3.5/Claude, why do I need DDG to be involved?
I need this to be integrated w/ Shottr! That would be very cool!
Is there an API for this?
Indeed. Panning as well.
And that's why we end up with antivax, and anti science conspiracies.

This is food for their argumentation, and with that kind of stuff, it's hard to explain that science should prevail.

This is sad.
Maybe I've let 'GATTACA' influence my thoughts too much but it seems like all it proves is that someone was in the building that possessed a sample of a particular person's DNA.
I dunno man, sometimes things are good in different contexts. Monospace makes stuff really easy to align when programming, and while I do like the idea of elastic tabstops and have tried it out before, in practice they don't work so well.
First, I agree it's important to put Tesla recalls in context with the greater automotive industry, so I think what you posted is great info. The only thing I'd disagree with is that the numbers compared to Tesla, and relative media coverage, is surprising. It seems expected to me.

Tesla bills itself not as an automaker, but a tech company. So, it makes sense they'd have a larger media footprint, which covers not just the automotive industry, but the tech industry media as well. This isn't unfair, considering they get the benefit of a tech-based market cap to go with it [1].

They also put themselves in headlines more often than other car companies with outlandish claims such as Musk saying, "At this point, I think I know more about manufacturing than anyone currently alive on earth." [2] When Musk and the company put themselves in headlines so often, it makes sense that the media would cover them more. This is likely a direct result of their advertising strategy, to create buzz [3], so I think media coverage of failures is a direct result.

You could argue that's Musk, not the company, but they made the strategic decision that Musk is their PR function when they became the only car company to dissolve their PR department in 2020 [4].

One last thing I noticed was that the source of the recall data comes from the NHTSA [5], and they don't seem to distinguish recalls between different brands owned by the same company (for example, Ford's recalls seem like they would include both Ford and Lincoln, GM includes Chevrolet, GMC, etc.) Tesla's 20 recalls in 2022 cover I believe the four models they made in 2022, while Ford's 67 recalls are across the 39 models under the Ford brand and five models under Lincoln (I counted these by looking at the drop-down selectors on KBB's value estimator [6]).

In short, Tesla exploits the hype machine; is it surprising that their recalls are hyped as well?

[1] https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/tesla-...

[2] https://www.thestreet.com/markets/elon-musk-ted-talk

[3] https://fourweekmba.com/tesla-marketing-strategy/

[4] https://electrek.co/2020/10/06/tesla-dissolves-pr-department...

[5] https://datahub.transportation.gov/Automobiles/NHTSA-Recalls...

[6] https://www.kbb.com/car-prices/
I didn't know Claude until I saw it as an option for DDG chat model. What caught my attention was the tagline "instant". Interesting. I decided to give it a try with expectations to see answers coming up almost instantly. And they really did. I'm enjoying it so far.
> Some companies will literally sell products for less than the cost of the components that go into them.

But that is not what Tesla is doing, is it?
I personally search for lots of things that aren't arousing to me.
How do you define "species" because there are things like ring species that break the mold of basic definitions.

https://evolution.berkeley.edu/a-closer-look-at-a-classic-ri...

As you go along the ring you can easily observe the creation of new species through evolution that can't breed with each other.
These are the people who are directly responsible:

https://www.nestle.com/investors/corporate-governance/manage...

Directors at Nestlé and their other associations:

- Paul Bulcke: L'Oréal, Roche Holding

- U. Mark Schneider: None listed

- Henri de Castries: HSBC Holdings, Saint-Gobain

- Dick Boer: None listed

- Kimberly A. Ross: PQ Group Holdings, Chubb Ltd

- Dinesh Paliwal: Bristol Myers Squibb, Raytheon Technologies

- Patrick Aebischer: Lonza Group, Logitech

- Kasper Rorsted: Siemens AG, Bertelsmann

- Lindiwe Majele Sibanda: None listed

- Anna Richell: None listed

- Eva Cheng: None listed

- Renato Fassbind: Swiss Re, Kühne+Nagel International
Nope, I use a compiler to compile, a makefile to drive the compiler an editor to edit and bash to control them all.

Do you compile with an IDE?

There used to be tools that built compiler, runtime, debugger and editor all into a single monolithic hammer, like 4D in late '90s (FourthDimension). There is excel, of course. Nice for prototyping, but very clunky if you want for build and maintain professional software packages that are easy to test and to deploy.

If visual studio were the only way to use Visual C++, we'd long ago abandoned cross platform development.
Another thing I found out is that holding the right mouse button drags the image around the screen.
You can be a "nutjob" for a long list of really stupid reasons when it comes to foolishly talking about health topics and personal choice on the world wide web.
Guess, it has to do with profit margin. To be price competitive and also make a huge profit, sugar is added as a filler. Sugar is cheap compared to other ingredients may be. Added sugar varies by countries.
Sharing the C++ Annotations here, which is a continiously updated book on modern C++. http://www.icce.rug.nl/documents/cplusplus/
You typed this just as I was posting my own response. Yes, it does work! I found out that using the right mouse button does the panning. Is there another method that you found?
You're not addressing the core issue that I brought up.

They use the term "open source" inappropriately. They could have said "fair licensing terms" but instead chose to use "open source".

If their licensing terms are as good for 99% of user, then they should say "fair licensing terms that are as good as open source for 99% of users", not that they're open source.
It's no more scientific to reject evidence only because it is subjective.

For a whole lot of psychological conditions that do not get to the extremes the only reasonable assessment we can do is whether the patient feels there is a problem, or exhibit indicators of distress in relation to the problem.

Are you washing your hands so much it is OCD and a problem, or is it just a preference? At the margins - if you e.g. do it so much your hurt yourself - it becomes possible to argue it is objective, but for most people the answer purely comes down to whether or not it is subjectively a problem to them.

That does not mean we can not systematically measure whether people report an improvement under varying conditions and using varying methods.

It doesn't really matter if it is subjective - when the problem is that the patient feels there is a problem, then if the patient no longer reports feeling a problem, then unless you're prepared to assume that they are all in denial or lying, that is evidence of improvement even if it does not raise to the standard of evidence we would prefer.

It would be unreasonable to overstate what that means, but equally unreasonable to pretend it provides no signal in the absence of higher standard evidence unless you can identify specific problems (lack of ability to reproduce would be one).
I’m glad they gave an option to turn it off for people who don’t care about AI.
Holy f*ck! Is this AI?
Serious question, is side loading supported on Android in mainland China?
NASA have set a precedent that they won't pay, even if ordered to by a government that has jurisdiction where the debris landed:

https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/34928/did-nasa-...
Modern CSPRNGs can generate numbers at GB/s, I find it hard to believe it would slow the game down in a measurable way.

The "right" solution you describe sounds overcomplicated and error-prone (now you need to think carefully about which domains are separated) compared to just using a CSPRNG.
Don’t people do that all the time with Qt?
And in next thread, we discuss why the teenagers get eating disorders more then then used to. It is totally social media, nothing to do with how we talk about food and weight.
>Additionally, all metadata that contains personal information (for example, your IP address) is obfuscated from underlying model providers (for example, OpenAI, Anthropic).

They are acting as a proxy to increase privacy, which is pretty much their entire business model.
> targeted surveillance

This one is really interesting. I thought a lot about it after the revelations that Uber were targeting law enforcement based on user behaviour, and refusing to offer them rides in areas where they were breaking regulations.

Of course, one option is that the developers were fully aware of what they were doing, and were perhaps motivated by money or some sort of libertarian ideology.

The other option - more compelling in my mind - is that this functionality was carefully broken down into innocuous pieces and distributed on a need-to-know basis. One feature which groups users in configurable ways based on their history. Another feature that allows on-the-fly ride prioritisation based on user groups. Another feature that localises prioritisation to geographic areas. The upshot is that only some managers knew what the full potential of the functionality was.
I find the ribbon to be a horrible interface as well. Perhaps the worst possible option. Despite having to use it for a very long time now, it still takes ages of hunting to find what I'm looking for. And it takes up far too much screen space.

The menu, at least, makes it obvious where to find stuff and doesn't move things around.
>The Nido brand is trusted by mothers, with a taste that kids love.

https://www.nestle.com/brands/baby-foods/nido
Binary Greedy Voxel Meshing Algorithm
I am not the project author.

Video explainer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnGoGq7DWMc