skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No, that's the same misunderstanding previously stated.

Answering "I don't know" because it a likely response to a particular string is completely different from being aware that one does not know the answer and saying so.

Both motivations lead to the same outcome, but they're unrelated processes. The response "I don't know" can represent either:

1. The most likely answer to a particular question, based on statistical data; or

2. An expression of an agent's internal state.

Figuring out that distinction is perhaps one of the most important questions ever raised.
I have a hunch that Apple hasn't released a folding iPhone simply because they don't want to sell a phone with a crease in the screen. Similarly, they might be sticking with the current Siri design until some LLM flaws can be ironed out.

I am not an Apple user though, so I have very little experience with Siri.
In the browser, fine, but what about in the terminal?
I loved every second of it. It was so refreshing. I guess what’s great for both of us is that there’s just so many movies these days.
Thanks for the feedbacks. The author here. Personally I found it more "fun" (well, I guess for everybody it's different) to have some meme in between of the articles, some people hate to read too much text all in once, but yeah, I get your point. So I was thinking maybe I should add a switch like "meme off" to hide all of those at the top of article so that people don't like it can feel better while reading it.
Okay but is this a failure of the user or an unintuitive UX? We can't just expect to pass cognitive burden onto users in a million places. UI affordances and conventions exist for a reason.
This is the core thing. Our acceptance rate is extremely low - under 10% for computer science. There are a lot of things we want to accomplish in admissions; _one_ of them is a statistical bias towards being able to succeed in the program. We obviously can't predict super accurately for a single student, but we try to create scoring criteria that result in success. Dropping the SAT caused a statistically significant reduction in success. We look at a lot of things, but, much as Harvard observed, a lot of those other things have even more bias. If you rocked the AIME, for example, we know a lot about your math skills, but there's a lot of bias ($$$) in which schools make it possible to participate in that, and there are a lot of students who will do well despite not having done AMC/AIME. Etc.
"For a short period in 2023, the person in charge of OpenAI's $175 million startup fund, Jacob Vespers, appears to have been completely fabricated."
Nobody remotely versed in this stuff would expect SMS to be end-to-end encrypted, though to be honest the more notable fact to me here is that Apple can read any plaintext in your backups. iMessage is an over the top messaging service more akin to WhatsApp or Signal than it is to SMS, so that is a more relevant comparison. I don't know if any of the clients store plaintext messages that would be backed up to Apple in a similar manner or not, but I'd hope at least the more security focused ones do not.

Apple makes privacy claims about iMessage including 'Apple can’t decrypt the data.', which is notably false in this (common) scenario, and requires a large asterisk on those claims, IMO bordering on making them unethical, period.
> But critics of the past were never anonymous. If you review film or food or anything, and it got published you put your name next to it.

Partially. You would -publish- with your name beside it, but you were anonymous when you went to the restaurant, so they wouldn't know you were a critic.
And if people cease to procreate, it's even more advantageous!
Two camps I see are (1) those who want to hold the program in their head and be able to answer ever more obscure questions about the program using their understanding. And (2) those who try things until it works and then address problems as needed.

Do these two camps align with your two camps? Those who want control fight the cascade, others just fiddle with it until it looks good?

I don't mean to disparage either camp, because we need both approaches in the real world.
'Lerc' comment speaks to the key thing here: there was a miscommunication:

Donor: I would like to charge you with care and control of this archival material.
Recipient: Thank you for the containers and fuel.

What happened then is in the past, no going back. The incident raises the bar for archive recipients ("is this an archive, what can we do with it").

Some archiving orgs now will not accept donations without a monetary donation to cover the archiving process. I have to say I agree with that, insofar as it filters out "I didn't discard it, I donated it to a museum".
The EPA did try to curtail their usage but was blocked by the 5th Circuit[0]. They will hopefully either appeal or try to issue another rule using a different authority.

[0]https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/us-appeals-court-cu...
What if people just don't answer the same questions over and over? Old answers can be linked, but the whole point of allowing repetition is to get fresh answers, ideally from new people. People going insane repeating themselves is a separate issue that can be solved in much better ways than prohibiting duplicate questions.
Hello everyone, we just did a speed run with Argilla and KAIST AI to fine-tune the beefy new Mixtral model with some new techniques that came out recently. More details in the model card - enjoy!
The point isn't really the films that they've made, but the experiences others have had underneath those directors when making them.
The part that's got me confused is the illustration near the end, with the caption: "In the MX-30 e-Skyactiv R-EV’s electric propulsion unit, the already compact rotary engine shares a common axle with the generator and motor."

I don't get how the engine can be decoupled from the wheels if it's mounted to the same axle as the motor?
But OLED isn't an option on any MacBook model currently?
He didn’t know perfectly, but he knew with great enough probability to place an order. In the very small chance that someone wanted two beers, someone would speak up.

This way is logically most efficient to work and involve the least communication.
The Tokyo Toilet
Fraudsters feel the fear: why prison sentences may deter white collar crime
... the point isn't to compare their films, it's to compare the experience of working for each of them.
That’s beside the point. Look up ‘regression to the mean’. If two highly gifted parents each with an IQ of 150 have children, their children will very likely be in the upper half or even perhaps upper quarter of the IQ distribution, but very unlikely to be the top 0.025% ~ IQ of 150. That is, their kids will be above average, but likely not Ivy quality.

There’s a reason legacy admissions need a thumb on the scale.
Sorry my tries to make an interesting conversation ended in a
trainwreck. I did get piled on for basically repeating what was in
the linked article, and then defending it. Probably should have just
walked away from a topic that cannot be discussed in this sort of
format. At least I hope the George Carlin sketch was worth it. Sorry.
> Of course, I can imagine that there will be a significant discount even just considering the price of high end branded memory outside Apple.

Apple wanted $3,000 for 160GB of memory for my Mac Pro (i.e. going from a base 32 to 192GB).

OWC sells the same memory (same spec, same manufacturer) now for $620, though I believe I paid about $1,000.

They also wanted another $3,000 for an 8TB SSD. Similarly, I was able to buy a 4xM.2 PCI card, and populate it with 4 x 2TB SSDs for under $1,500. Furthermore my PCI setup is FASTER than the Apple drive (7GBps versus 5.5).
The CUID readme [1] explains that there's no real point to K-sortable on modern hardware:

[1] https://github.com/paralleldrive/cuid2?tab=readme-ov-file#no...
Do they really have to be that long? And why can't they just be 4-4-4-4 (I'm sure someone knows). In hobby apps I often .split('-')[0] lol the first 8 is fine (so far)
An LLM able to e.g. summarize the gist of a long text conversation in a group chat that I missed, able to understand queries like "what time did X say we'd meet up, and how long would it take me to get there" etc. would be incredibly useful to me.

Sure, most of that is possible server-side – but the appeal would be that local processing could preserve a lot more privacy.
I think hallucination is better and more accurate at it implies a bit of imagination and buffoonery deceit.

I don’t think confabulate matches as well as it implies confusion or mixture of different ideas.

ChatGPT isn’t confused, it’s making things up. It’s trying to bullshit as best it can in hope that what it makes up convinces its user.
Fear of complexity is the number one reason why many "simple" homebrew solutions were born to solve simple problems at time, from what I observed in recent years across a few companies I worked for. The hard truth is, fewer simple things can stay simple while continue being useful in the long run.

The value I get from Kubernetes, is the API platform that allows my system to organically become more complex overtime, but hopefully in an organized way.
https://twitter.com/itsandrewgao/status/1689634145717379074?...

Yeah this is really having a positive impact on scientific discovery.
I bet you could overthink that a bit if you tried. You didn't even try, did you?
breakable with a Python script

The traditional, elegant method of a more civilized age:

Last on the program were Len Adleman and his computer, which had accepted a challenge on the first night of the conference. The hour passed; various techniques for attacking knapsack systems with different characteristics were heard; and the Apple II sat on the table waiting to reveal the results of its labors. At last Adleman rose to speak mumbling something self-deprecatingly about “the theory first, the public humiliation later” and beginning to explain his work. All the while the figure of Carl Nicolai moved silently in the background setting up the computer and copying a sequence of numbers from its screen onto a transparency. At last another transparency was drawn from a sealed envelope and the results placed side by side on the projector. They were identical. The public humiliation was not Adleman‘s, it was knapsack’s.

W. Diffie, The first ten years of public-key cryptography, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 560-577, May 1988
https://www.trmlabs.com/careers-list?gh_jid=5051368004
>The amount stolen was $44B. She needs to return $27B to not be executed.

Ah, that's the context I was missing.
Indianapolis High School Carves Time Away from Class for Internships for All
Anonymous critique has been an important component of public discussion since before the printing press.
Sometimes I have to agree with Victoria Nuland.
Waiting for the EU to force PCs to ship with at least 16GB of RAM and then Apple to immediately announce how they were planning this whole time to double the starting RAM on their base machines then turn it into a 2h presentation about innovation, sustainability and thetics.
Hedge fund investor here chiming in for all of you financial wizards. Hint: don't look at EBITDA. Look at (Atlas) revenue, billings, (current) remaining performance obligations, and operating cash flow. On cash flow, some people decide they want to subtract stock comp (i.e. don't add it back in the GAAP Net Income > OCF reconcilation), but that's a whole other philosophical debate that the investing community has not settled on.

Can someone tell me what their licensing changes are?
Flourishing romances arem the result of proactive behaviors, not soulmate spark
And they charged for support.
Lipitor, Flonase, Xanax are all PFAS. Also about half of new pharmaceuticals in development are pfas.
No, the point is it's a circle, with the output feeding back into the input.
If "computer" and "refrigerator" are on the same level of "places where people do the bulk of their computing on" to you, I suppose so.
CNDI is growing quickly!

I also wanted to call out that cndi is a great fit for deploying services that go beyond data management.

If you have the opportunity to deploy a new service, and you are trying to decide if you should buy a PaaS or self-host the system, the CNDI toolchain allows you to self-host with the ease of PaaS.

This is especially useful if you generally don’t work on infrastructure already and want a way to jump in quickly.

If you’re on a data team and you're looking to do orchestration with Airflow, or if you’re building a new web service and need a PostgreSQL database, CNDI is a great fit.

You can find a growing list of services cndi supports at https://cndi.dev/templates, but don’t forget you can also make your own!
So your IDs are now tightly bound to whatever "types" you've currently decided you have, forcing a narrow view of what an entity is and making the entire system extremely brittle to change? What is a "type" even supposed to be? This is forcing a doubling-down on an already problematic design principle: that every entity is exactly one type of thing and these types of things are completely different than those types of things and obviously you can just make the perfect set of types that will never change if you think think really hard and everyone will agree on what each type means and they'll never change and that will never be a problem.

Jesus, what a nightmare.
I am guessing they will be working to bring down those prices given how much of an advantage large RAM is for AI. Maybe they could even bring back RAM slots. Although I guess that wouldn't make sense given that bandwidth is also important and HBM doesn't go in slots.
You underestimate how much people hate the guardrails for the cloud AIs.
I'm personally looking forward to it. One of the biggest advantages with running locally is cost. Yes, the upfront cost to getting your own hardware is much higher, but I'd much rather pay for something once then worry about paying a monthly bill for using someone else's infra that they may at any time decide to pull out of service or hike the price for.

The "no data sent to servers" point I agree is super important for work things. I pay for and use Github Copilot for personal things but I'm not allowed to use it at work for obvious reasons. If we could remove the privacy concerns and run these models on local hardware (that people actually have) then it'd be game changing.

Reading some of the other anti-AI comments is a bit odd. I guess it's going to depend on what you do for work, but as someone who writes software not using Copilot is like comparing myself from a 0.25x developer to a 2x developer. I mean that when I say it, but I get that you do need to be able to identify wrong code faster than you can run it.
The Gartner Hype Cycle has proven itself over and over again.

https://www.gartner.com/en/research/methodologies/gartner-hy...

We have not reached the "Peak of Inflated Expectations" yet in AI. Contrast that to Blockchain and Cryptocurrency, where we are definitely in the "Trough of Disillusionment".
You really need to appreciate the difference between an average person living under a corrupt communist regime, and a country where jail conditions aren't all that nice after you commit a crime. Even the numbers in this case are 3% of Vietnam's GPD embezzled by one, or less than 0.1% of the US GDP produced by prisoners collectively (according to your link). I'm tired of seeing these one-line dismissive "zingers" that have taken over the internet.
It is possible it is the next self-driving car, or nuclear fusion.

A sudden exponential set of improvements that allowed everyone to dream that self-driving anything was around the corner. Actual promising real world result that show we are really no that far.

But the last bridge to cross is actually extremely slow and what was around the corner, becomes a decade away.

That said, it's not fruitless. AI is useful as it is today, and if does not go pick up your kids at school in the next 10 years, it would still be useful.
An error-correction code inside the ID?! I love it.
Is the Boom-and-Bust Business Cycle Dead?
Presumably the logic here is that they have 136 million existing reviews, which is an incredibly valuable asset.

If they want reviews to no longer be anonymous, they can either do the right thing and delete/hide 100+ million reviews... or they can do what they're doing, anger a few tens of thousands of people who are paying attention but keep that valuable content.
> I suspect that there's no good reason that a 25 year-old can't be a great startup CEO.

There's exactly one: Learning takes time.

The smartest, kindest, most level-headed 25 y/o is not going to be as good a leader as their 35 y/o self, assuming they continue to build on their leadership skills.

Now we could say, well, maybe those 25 year-old CEOs overwhelmingly exhibit degraded leadership skills by the time they're 35. That's a statistic that's possible. But I think it would point toward some seriously prevalent burnout, not an inherent benefit of being 25. It may be easier to be positive at 25, but I don't think the ceiling for positivity is higher at 25 than at 35.
Also, I can run Mixtral 8x22B right now on my MacBook. Highly capable, local, (preferably uncensored) models are phenomenal for my productivity. Nothing else comes close to matching Apple silicon's up to 192GB of VRAM for its price.
> Is it illegal for apple to do something on-device that runs queries against all the databases for the user's applications?

Why would it be illegal?
Remote work requires a lot of trust. That's my read, but also independent of gp comment.
Swimming in the (sometimes cold) sea. It's somehow addictive.
Conversation
Psychedelics force you to break out of mental loops, and give you a new way to look at things (one that is already possible and intrinsic to you, but locked away by bad experiences) -- meaning a new, better way to live and experience life is possible.

As someone who has used a lot of psychedelics, it is transformative, once you realize everything is literally all in your head. That no matter the pain and suffering you're going through, life can be beautiful, and lovely, and enjoyable. Psychedelics can even show you the things, issues, and parts of you that you've been running away from.

But then the onus is on you. You have three options: go back to your normal life, and continue going through the same cycle of suffering (uncommon); continue (ab)using psychedelics to reach the same state (common); or take what you've learned and start making changes to yourself and your life, so you don't have to use them again (rare).
1. My post wasn't an argument; it was snark.

2. What Alexander signed is enough that the US isn't going to give it back, ever. And no Russian government since Alexander II has been in a position where taking Alaska back is a possibility.
That's not right. Deterrence establishes a causal link between the punished and the criminals of tomorrow, who consider the likely outcome of their crime before committing it.
Why not only make new reviews non-anonymous and disclose it?
Do you have a CSS component framework that you can recommend for use with BEM?
Apple advise whom to contact on their website for guidance, but they are of course not alone in dispensing this and similar advice.

Apple:

"If you have received an Apple threat notification
We strongly suggest you enlist expert help, such as the rapid-response emergency security assistance provided by the Digital Security Helpline at the nonprofit Access Now. Apple threat notification recipients can contact the Digital Security Helpline 24 hours a day, seven days a week through their website. Outside organizations do not have any information about what caused Apple to send a threat notification, but they can assist targeted users with tailored security advice."

https://support.apple.com/en-lamr/102174

Amnesty International:

"The Access Now Helpline and other Security Lab civil society partners are also equipped to support individuals who have received these Apple notifications."

https://securitylab.amnesty.org/latest/2024/04/apple-threat-...
I actually did this myself last year for Linux (https://tmpout.sh/3/22.html): it comes out to 73 bytes minimum for a useful program that executes its own code. I should really finish up my writeup establishing that mimimum. (The linked article walks through golfing a 77-byte Hello World program within the headers.)

It's not so easy to find it by naively testing for ignored header fields, since it depends on the precise details of which sizes and addresses must have the same alignment within a page. I instead proceeded from first principles, by studying the ELF loader and determining which programs are definitely ruled out.
Actually, just within today. I was still able to access the project several hours ago. The "filter version" is still alive: https://gitlab.com/magnolia1234/bypass-paywalls-clean-filter...
You are correct! Not a technology, I'd just give them a list (eg. Shostakovich Piano Cto 2), maybe in the when 'when you read this I am gone' letter, though I would like to make it happen before then, so we can talk! ... and yes, that means do some work now.

also consider (Grand)^n(children)

Ideas about how to leave a 'repertoire legacy' would merit a new thread!
Sorry OP, you seem to have a wrong understanding of what an LLM is, does and how it's trained. And I know that an LLM is not a chatbot, no worries.

At most, your project is a simple language model, but definitely not a large language model.

After looking at your code, you also seem to have a wrong understanding of embeddings. Other people in this thread have already shared great resources that offer good explanations on these topics.

You seem to be very dismissive of Markov chains (or HMMs) while they've been used in NLP for years and produce really great results. Your project seems to use some concepts of Markov chains but more simplified. Here [1] is a random article that does next-token prediction using Markov chains. It's basically what your project does but in a more scalable and probabilistic way.

>Use cases include: Auto-completion, auto-correct, spell checking, search/lookup, conversation simulation (chatbot), and more.

These use cases are not possible using the concepts used in your project.

[1] https://bespoyasov.me/blog/text-generation-with-markov-chain...
OpenTofu PR’d a feature in response to a request to do what Terraform had done under a different license. Hashicorp would be foolish not to look into it.
I was hoping that some large set of keywords generated spider images.
When webmail (Gmail, Hotmail, etc) first came out, one objection I remember is that it was a bad idea, because it meant you couldn't get at your email if the service went down. How foolish of you to rely on someone else to keep their website up 100% of the time. That thinking passed as expertise in keeping systems up became its own branch of software engineering. So we forget that it's very possible to do a bad job of keeping a website up. some of the platform engineering work isn't just for show, it turns out.
I remember the days when I used SO extensively when I just started development.

But now just regular search and experience is just enough to resolve most of the questions and not to deal with the arrogance of some folks on SO.
I am of the opinion that America should put sanctions on Israel, but unfortunately it is ILLEGAL to voice that opinion in my state[1].

[1] https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/anti-bds-legislation
Love the (OpenZiti) name!
Which rare earth minerals go into solar cells?
1.4 MB floppy OS – MenuetOS video
The reason I was afraid and still am of COVID-19 is precisely due to the decades it takes us to find the viral root cause of so many diseases, and a new disease means we may not live long enough to see what disease we've got was caused by it. HSV, HPV, and EBV are so common and are linked to so many types of cancer.