Citing unconstitutional laws does you no favors. A law can exist and simultaneously be unconstitutional.

The constitution says:

> Any and all censorship of political, ideological and artistic nature is prohibited

Now let's work through this incredibly simple logic.

1. Any and all censorship of ideological nature is prohibited.
2. Nazism is an ideology.
3. Therefore, censorship of nazism is prohibited.

I really don't see how it could possibly be more complicated than that.

You cited this Monark guy. I just looked it up and this is the exact speech that got him cancelled:

> A esquerda radical tem muito mais espaço do que a direita radical, na minha opinião. As duas tinham que ter espaço. Eu sou mais louco que todos vocês. Eu acho que o nazista tinha que ter o partido nazista, reconhecido pela lei.

> The radical left has much more space than the radical right, in my opinion. Both should have space. I'm crazier than all of you. I think the nazis should have the nazi party, recognized by law.

Ironically, it boils down to the exact same argument I used in a previous reply to you. The status quo is not logically consistent.

Let's go over it again:

1. Nazism is banned in Brazil.
2. Brazil has numerous communist parties.
3. Communism is just as bad as if not even worse than nazism.
4. Therefore, either communists must be banned or nazism must be allowed.

It's really simple. Why is nazism banned while these communists get to walk this earth completely unpunished? If you're gonna jail nazis, why in the fuck won't you also jail communists who are even worse? Either allow it or send the communists to jail. Society must pick one of those options in order to avoid some rather unfortunate implications.

Either way, the consequences he suffered for that opinion were also of a free nature. Namely, freedom of association. The other guys didn't want to be associated with him after that and that's absolutely OK. I couldn't find any evidence that the state actually prosecuted or arrested him over that opinion.

So this:

> Also for defending things like the creation of a nazi party, which is also forbidden by brazilian laws.

Is absolute nonsense. This is not actually an example of brazilian laws being upheld. It's an example of people being offended at his "craziness" and then removing him from their circles. Not even in the same ballpark as the state repression we are discussing here. The "consequences" you cited are entirely acceptable and are exactly how society ought to work. If you don't like what he said, then simply refuse to associate with him and refuse to give him money. Calling for censorship of his thoughts is absolutely not acceptable.

From what I'm seeing the persecution only truly started once he started discussing the election. That's when the supreme court started going after him to the point he fled to the United States. Not over nazism as you claimed, over the so called "fake news" as defined by court. In other words, straight up censorship.

Edit:

By the way, neither of us had read the brazilian law you cited. It's time to make this right. I just read the entire document. I invite you to do it as well.

Open the document, search it for "nazi" and you'll find this exact article:

> § 1º Fabricar, comercializar, distribuir ou veicular símbolos, emblemas, ornamentos, distintivos ou propaganda que utilizem a cruz suástica ou gamada, para fins de divulgação do nazismo.

> § 1º Fabricate, commercialize, distribute or convey symbols, emblems, ornaments, distinctives or propaganda which use the swastika or gammadion for the purpose of divulging nazism.

There's nothing about nazi ideology in there. Nowhere does it say that you are prohibited from discussing nazism in any way. It doesn't even say anything about "making apology to Nazism" as you claimed. The term "apology" does not appear anywhere in that text. There is absolutely nothing in that law that criminalizes anything this Monark did.

It just prohibits nazi paraphernalia and propaganda.

Just incredibly ironic that you are the one who ended up spreading misinformation.