skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
(SELinux is enabled as of Fedora 39.)

> I would need to have a completely separate AppVM for each application and I don't think QubesOS was meant to be used like that.

I think that’s a decent starting point, actually. Not only that, but also separate disposable VMs for individual tasks, like reading a PDF.
WD launches 4TB SD card
Outrun remake in Amstrad CPC basic (French)
Remastering can screw up intent with something as simple as color grading.

But there is a line here. An editor that's using simple tools knows exactly what they're changing, and if they're using simple frame-global tools then they're not introducing anything that wasn't already there.

If you throw an AI at things, it will try to guess what things in the image are, and make detail adjustments based on that.

So that's three categories of edit, easily distinguished: human making frame-global changes, human deliberately changing/adding details, AI changing/adding details in a way that's basically impossible to fully supervise.

It sounds like they accept category 1 in remastering, even though it's not foolproof, and reject 2 and 3.
Too bad most people use Javascript frameworks for desktop development.
FWIW, I don’t know that I disagree based on our experience as described in reply to another comment
> a very fit and very strong person can wrongly be classified (and in the opposite direction too)

Unfortunately, it usually goes in the bad direction, by quite a bit. BMI under-predicts obesity. You only have to hit 25% body fat as a male to be obese, or 32% as a female.

https://academic.oup.com/jes/article/7/Supplement_1/bvad114....
The article is about Russia.

Russia invaded Ukraine, and senior Russian politicians are threatening several countries with nuclear annihilation.

Rather than improving infrastructure and social care[0], and helping regions affected by natural disasters[1], the regime is singularly focused on weapons production.

This is dangerous, and it's for the Russian people to put a stop to their leaders' ambitions.

[0] https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2024/01/10/total-disgrace-ang...

[1] https://apnews.com/article/russia-kazakhstan-floods-evacuati...
The issue is virality, i.e. derivative work of the AGPL software should also be AGPL, so it's unlikely that serious companies would be willing to take the risk of potentially exposing their entire non-auth stack to AGPL and having to argue the line for what would be derivative work and what is not.

Many big companies have blanket policies either banning AGPL completely, or require strict legal review.

Re the payment question: it is a common SaaS licensing model to dual license under AGPL and a commercial license. AGPL serves as a deterrent for business customers to use it without purchasing the commercial license.
I look at this from the other direction and find psychology's obsession and fixation on trying to discover what is wrong with their patients and labelling them to be an uncalled for and likely harmful.

I feel the idea that a psychologist should make your life better regardless of how healthy you are to be the normal, obvious idea. It's the compulsive pathologization that is truly bizarre. Why is that helping them?
That's one way to think about it.

It's clever way to encode "position in sequence" as some kind of smooth signal that can be added to each input vector. You might appreciate this detailed explanation: https://towardsdatascience.com/master-positional-encoding-pa...

Incidentally, you can encode dates (e.g. day of week) in a model as sin(day of week) and cos(day of week) to ensure that "day 7" is mathematically adjacent to "day 1".
Working on it — vanilla JS support is pretty high up on our list
I appreciate that many people have reservations about hyper-focusing on product development and utilising the serverless ecosystem. I understand that it may appear working with coarser primitives is constraining and unproductive, and for unfamiliar practitioners, like anything else, there's a learning curve. Having been involved in three startups that adopted the AWS serverless mantra, I've come to argue in its favour.

Serverless architectures require designs that accommodate these constraints upfront, and there's a learning curve to finding the best primitives to adopt. It's akin to building with Lego rather than a 3D printer—you're working within predefined limits. Once you understand the optimal patterns for utilising these constraints, they become guardrails that reduce development and operational costs over time.

In my experience, the bar for requiring "always on" is higher than we might realise. Also, the choice between serverless and traditional elastic computing models isn't always binary. Excellent options like AWS Fargate serve as a practical middle ground.

Of course, this approach is only sometimes applicable. There might be a tipping point where it might make sense to consider renting servers with more traditional hosting solutions. Is optimising operational costs by investing capital in rented or physical infrastructure a strategic decision post-startup?
If the value semantics aren't customizable, you can't really build abstractions. How would you even implement std::list?

Ultimately Swift is dependent on having all significant abstractions be built as part of the language-enabled standard library.
> Once upon a time, Reddit was created by people with strong beliefs in freedom of speech

> If your karma is too low, you’ll be prevented from writing comments in some subreddits. Your comments might be auto-collapsed, auto-deleted, or shadow-banned (depends on the subreddit settings that the moderators chose). You might also be rate limited, so you can only comment once every ten minutes. And this depends on just on your global karma value, but your karma score in a subreddit as well.

If the origins of Reddit was to champion freedom of speech, then it has deviated far from that.

Karma makes sense as a mechanism to prevent truly bad actors; i.e. users who are not behaving in the spirit of discourse: spammers/griefers/trolls. However it has a greater chilling effect as it effectively enables censorship, aids bad actors with karma gaming, and promotes the formation of echo chambers.

This is not a reflection of me or my views. I've observed numerous instances where perfectly valid contributions are buried under a pile of downvotes simply because they deviate from the accepted norm of a subreddit. For example, I was browsing one of the popular MacOS subreddits and the comments essentially boiled down "Mac Good, Windows Bad". So much misinformation was spread about how Windows works. Anyone who posted clarifying information correcting the misinformation about Windows was downvoted. Those comments are auto-collapsed, top level ones are buried behind the "show more comments" button.

To an extent I have observed this on Hacker News.

I've started playing a game where I try to guess what the comments are going to say for a particular post on Reddit and HN. Many times I'm right. I can tell right away what posts/comments are going to get lots of upvotes.

For example, do an ASK HN on show your personal blog. Easy way to gain karma. On Reddit I've noticed mentions of cats, anti-landlord, use of specific phrases garners the most upvotes. It would not surprise me if a GPT was trained to talk like a Redditor. I've had the thought to compile a list of common "redditisms".

Karma is not the problem. The issue squarely is were all just faceless usernames. So it is easy to dehumanize.
Now you make yourself look like a bitter person, since according to you all the software developers in the world will react a certain way and nothing can be done, except you, the holy doctors, showing the devs how to do their job, by becoming developers yourselves!

Meanwhile talking about hubris ...

All the while you could not be bothered to document things and not telling someone who tries to help, where their solution falls down, so that maybe they could improve, but at the same time keeping complaining about "fisher-price". No way they could have any new ideas. You did not have them, so how could they ever have a good idea for improving status quo. How I would have just loved to onboard you onto my engineering team! I am sure you would be great to work with, since sharing information seems to be your strong suit.

It seems very clear to me now, that you did not want things to change as a doctor. Did not want improvement, since nothing these engineer plebs could do would be good enough anyway. And that kind of attitude is exactly what made you part of the problem.
> it makes me wonder what else might be going on in other projects right now

I hope this can be a lesson learned. A lot is going on. There are lots and lots of agencies (both government-funded in all countries as well as black market ones) with a mission to own backdoors. They're all well-funded. That's what they do.

It is frustrating to watch every HN thread related to backdoors filled with rejections of this possibility as paranoia or silly tinfoil hatting. As if it wasn't happening. Here's one concrete case that was caught. Countless others, not yet caught.

And think about this one: this was on an open source project, which makes it easier to catch. Still we got lucky. Now consider all the closed source products, where backdooring just means infiltrating and/or arm-twisting a single organization. This happens often. Nobody wants to believe it but it's common. Anyone who has worked on tech infrastructure companies has some stories. They are difficult to tell due to NDAs and worse, but it happens.
Don't know the others but we visited Cesar Manriques' place 2 weeks ago and we all enjoyed it very much, including small kids (not in theme park way just to be clear).

Yeah its not visit of classics in Louvre but that guy sure knew how to build artistically pleasing gardens and surroundings, the design just 'clicked' with all of us immediately.
Are you implying that they are not able to build in most part of the world?
Ehm... I fail to see substantial arguments... I can just extract:

- having others using different tools and being non in comfy position it's a known thing, and often demonstrate that others choose bad habits instead of you

- pair programming is harmful

nothing else. I almost live in Emacs digitally since I boot to EXWM, have my files as org-mode attachments, info in general in notes and so on, I have some complaint like poor handling of floating windows, some blocking operation, rare crashes, ... witch are Emacs issues (well, Emacs ecosystem, at least), but the fact that others have other tools and working together due to the tools other use, not made to play with other, is an issue it's not an Emacs issue. It's like saying "Emails are bad because my contacts use WA and WA can't read or send emails". Pair programming fall in a similar category: "hey, I'm tall/short/fat/hairy/with little|large feet|hands so I do not fit well in common clothes, it's the final nail I have to conform my body to the others". It's not an argument, it's the DEFEAT of a human choosing to be part of a machine instead of being a human, with it's idea, tools and so on cooperating with other humans, similar, but different where the difference is the key of intelligent innovation, evolution, if our peers are smart.

Working in a setup that demand such level of conformism means working in a fragile setup (too tied to some third party tool) with limited innovation margins since different vision can't be compared and discussed regularly boosting idea migration.

Some conformism is useful under certain emergency, not in the ordinary life. Making ordinary life like an emergency means being unable to live.
From all I know it is pretty hard to get over here, if you cannot prove you already had an infection. This is because the official recommendation seems to be against Qdenga for so called "Dengue-Natives".

While it technically makes sense it is also not a very practical policy since most primary infections are asymptomatic or mild. Since you most likely don't know if you already had it, your doctor doesn't know if you benefit from Qdenga and will most likely stick to the official recommendation.
It depends. A large movie - yes. But many movies were made with less of a focus on the cinema and more on the video rental ("direct-to-video") or TV syndication.

TV content like Star Trek the Next generation were definitely never meant to display in high definition, and such things can show in props etc.
I’m glad there are alternatives to CPAPs for treating sleep apnea.

Given the link between some CPAP machines and certain types of cancer, the entire category makes me nervous.
So I guess you just never watch movies from before 1980 or so?
I think you're downplaying the importance of the attention/transformer architecture here. If it was "just" a matter of throwing compute at probabilities, then we wouldn't need any special architecture at all.

P(next_word|previous_words) is ridiculously hard to estimate in a way that is actually useful. Remember how bad text generation used to be before GPT? There is innovation in discovering an architecture that makes it possible to learn P(next_word|previous_words), in addition to the computing techniques and hardware improvements required to make it work.
Why do you restrict your comparison to wired connections only? No one cares how the internet comes into the house.

Btw, you can also do ethernet-over-powerline for the last mile. And there's tv cables, and the plain-old-telephone wires already in the ground.

If there's not enough competition, you should perhaps looks into regulation that's strangling that competition; instead of assuming blindly that more regulation is the answer to problems caused by too much regulation.
> and nearly the entire cohort was overweight in the conventional sense?

In this sense, in the US, over 70% of adults are overweight ("overweight or obese"). So the numbers seem reasonable splitting that population in half.
Ehm... Sorry, no. To prevent wildfires from the grid you need to make most cable underground, where you can't keep them in a clear area, large enough to avoid lighting up a fire if a pole drop.
The LRM is probably the best thing about SystemVerilog. Does a fantastic job of being a reference and an actually readable document you can learn from (which is lucky because the other SV resources on the internet are very sparse).

Just a shame about the language itself.
Simplified Technical English
If all ways to play HDR content makes it too dark, it's too dark.
We're already doing this. We have self-guided flying drones, do we not?
I'm not a professional programmer, just someone who uses Linux as their daily driver.

Discoverability is the most important thing than other reason for me when selecting a tool.

Quoting from Purl's README:

Simple Commands: Use straightforward options like -replace, -filter, and -exclude to manage your data.
Edit Files Easily: The -overwrite option allows you to update files directly, making changes quick and simple.

When I use `find, xargs, cat, sed, awk, perl, like tools`, I often struggle to remember even the simplest options. What is the option for 'ignore case', 'in-place edit', or 'info'? -i could mean anything.

This is one of the reasons I switched my shell to fish. It offers more discoverability than bash and zsh
Fish shell supports searching for a command's options name and description using <Tab><C-s> BY DEFAULT. I believe this approach is quite effective.

Thus, I prefer Purl like syntax more.
You can convert neural spatial representations to polygon based, so there is no need to use a much more inefficient path during the real time phase.
std::list (that is, a linked list) is pretty easy to write. Whether you want it to be a reference type or copy-on-write or a Collection (probably very difficult) is up to you. There’s not much that’s special in the standard library.
Yes/no. The Java security manager can, but it was deprecated ;-(

I know it was a pain to use correctly. But still.
I see your point, but if you follow this avenue, any two arguments can be called dogmatic. Please try to se it differently: the other side doesn't insist on one solution, understands that people have different needs, that different jobs have different requirements, and opposes to one inflexible policy for everyone.

It's like having people who insist that everybody should wear shoes of the same size: you can call those who oppose this stupid idea "dogmatic" but it's just semantics.
Totally right. Also helps with snoring. I'm using a small piece of masking tape to make sure my mouth is closed during sleep. Quite a common recommendation for when learning buteyko method.
That sounds more like philosophical pessimism and antinatalism. "Humane" doesn't cut any ice with a nihilist.
does anyone know how/when we can try this out?
I will never not be astounded by the rate storage has increased in my lifetime. My first PC had a whopping 20 megabyte hard disk that occupied not one but TWO 5.25” drive bays and appeared something like the following

https://www.priceblaze.com/st4121-Seagate-Storage-Hard-Drive...
> Maybe if you were getting a battery for other reasons, or as a luxury if you are wealthy enough.

Batteries are cheap. A 5 kWh battery storage pack can be had for ~1500€ these days, that's enough to ride at least the fridge, freezer and LED lighting for a day or two through a major event. In rural areas, add a small 1-2 kW generator and a transfer switch for another few hundred euros, and now you're completely set even for larger outages.
To be fair, people tend to have more expectations of a partially open freeway.
So the suggestion here is to implement source routing on a whim, with a table of 100+k entries? At your peering point?

An ISP has to do what it has to do to save their business when a large attack hurts their business. This may be what the attacker wants but that's not an excuse to do nothing.

But what machine learning has to do with this is not clear. Null routing protects you against traffic volume. Machine learning sounds like it maybe can help diagnose more sophisticated low-volume attacks. Maybe. You don't want anything remotely compute intensive when mitigating attacks.
Cameron doesn't give a crap. He just needs his latest shot of money.
Simplicity. Both of these require a lot of setup, and have less/no frontend integration. I would go with us if you are trying to focus on the rest of the app and not auth. The config you need to get started with us is nearly zero.
I would love to see a Linux distribution picking up on the concept of NixOS, with its content-addressed-package store and then use overlayfs and bubblewrap to create process local FHS compatible root file systems with only the dependencies of each process inside.
> If life isn't enjoyable

It can.

Whether you're happy or not boils down to hormones in your blood. Your goal is to maximize the amount of happy hormones and to minimize the negative hormones. Lots of things are biological reactions you can't do much about like "hungry = angry" but modern industrial life already covers most of that, so we're left with psychological reactions "Monday = sad" which can be trained and rewired, but you need to put all the work and basically fight your natural reactions until they change.

I decided to care less and be happier, and it's a long journey, but I see huge changes. I used to be constantly depressed, now I have moments of happiness.
Are you talking about a simple script which executes model’s instructions? It can literally be as simple as connecting the model to my computer command line. I will tell it what I want done and give it my cc number or website creds.

Obviously I’m talking about next gen models, like gpt5/6.
haha yea, the speed is really only there for the internet's attention span.

Good point on the 10's - updating that and thanks for trying!
Can you link app?
I am one of the maintainers of iceoryx and the creator of iceoryx2, so I wanted to add and complete some more details.

iceoryx/iceoryx2 was intended for safety-critical systems initially but now expands to all other domains. In safety-critical systems that run, for instance, in cars or planes, you do not want to have undefined behavior - but the STL is full of it, so we had to reimplement an STL subset in (https://github.com/eclipse-iceoryx/iceoryx/tree/master/iceor...) that does not use heap, exceptions or comes with undefined behavior.
So you can send vectors or strings via iceoryx, but you have to use our STL implementations.

It also comes with a service-oriented architecture; you can create a service - identified by name - and communicate via publish-subscribe, request-response, and direct events (and in the planning: pipeline or blackboard).

One major thing is iceoryx robustness. In safety-critical systems, we have a term called freedom-of-interference, meaning that a crash in application A does not affect application B. When they communicate via shared memory, for instance, and use a mutex, they could dead-lock each other when one app dies while holding the mutex. This is why we go for lock-free algorithms here that are tested meticulously, and we are also planning a formal verification of those lock-free constructs.

iceoryx2 is the next-gen of iceoryx where we refactored the architecture heavily to make it more modular and address all the major pain points.
* no longer requires a central daemon and has decentralized all the management tasks, so you get the same behavior without the daemon
* comes with events that can be either based on an underlying fd-event (slower but can be integrated with OS event-multiplexing), or you can choose the fast semaphore route (it is now up to the user)

Currently, we are also working on language bindings for C, C++, Python, Lua, Swift, C#, etc.
Revisiting BlackPlanet, and a lost era when social media was still fun
Merlin should obviously be called "XKCD 1425"[1] rather than "Shazam for Birds" if they're intent on renaming to something less distinctive

[1]: https://xkcd.com/1425/
If there is a movie which is only shot in 1080p and I have a 4k TV, it seems like there’s three options. One, watch it in the original 1080p with 3/4 of the screen as black border. Two, stretch the image, making it blurry. Three, upscale the image. If you give me the choice, I’m choosing 3 every time.

Sorry if it sounds crass, but I feel the process of shooting the movie is less important than the story it is trying to tell.
AMZN ain't making its profit selling books and toothbrushes.

It's all the yummy egress and all the other markups you're paying for.
though we monopolized physical violence and most of society runs on psychological warfare
Wasn't it worse fuel economy (lower ISP) but higher thrust?
> Eli Lilly, which currently manufactures two medications that compete with Ozempic — Zepbound for obesity and Mounjaro for diabetes — premiered a commercial that complicates the rapid weight-loss narrative: “Some people have been using medicine never meant for them. For the smaller dress or tux, for a big night, for vanity. But that’s not the point. People whose health is affected by obesity are the reason we work on these medications.

Great advertising - they probably are not supposed to advertise "Ask for zepbound to lose weight", so instead they write copy that makes out that it is a warning. "For the smaller dress or tux, for a big night, for vanity." is the hook phrase - with sentences placed before and after to imply that it is a warning.

Most people switch off to warnings, and the negatives just sell it harder to the vast majority that secretly believe "no risk no reward" or "no pain no gain". Plus the underlying thought that the best drugs are difficult to access and dispensed by doctors.

Brilliant.
More like a ~300 Euro mid-range Android Phone already does 99% of what most people need: messaging, taking photos, web browsing, run all the popular apps, etc. and now are starting to have decent SoC performance, decent camera processing, longer SW support and high refresh OLED displays to boot.

So if you strip away the artificially gate-kept services like iMessage, why should anyone who isn't tied in the Apple ecosystem spend a lot more on an iPhone?