skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'll be sure to tell my three uncles who raise pigs, tobacco, corn, soybeans, and peanuts the next time I see them that they aren't farmers. I should probably ask my cousins how they manage to find time to sit on their asses given their employment in the timber industry, ask my father what a sedentary ironworker even looks like, and then there's the minor issue of all the time I've spent working in the trades during the week and on heavy equipment on the weekends...
Doom as an Interface for Process Management (2000)
Quickly looking at the course that was initially mentioned, it doesn’t look like they force you to go faster than you want, but for $200/mo I imagine learners tend to push themselves too much, too quickly, so they can stop paying ASAP. I’ll bet the Draw A Box stuff just doesn’t come with that kind of pressure.
> We will probably add a quarterly task to update it, until/unless we start maintaining a public branch and do it automatically.

Unless you only update the code running on the website quarterly, I don't think this complies with the license.
> People generally like their elected representative

This is definitely part of it but not all of it. There's more. I hear people complaining about the exact people they vote for.

I think another part of the problem is simply parties. We vote along lines rather than actual beliefs. I actually believe we'd be better off without them. Or at least affiliations on ballots. Like how we do judges. Hand out a booklet, let people vote by mail and take their time. But don't give people the super lazy version. Some friction is good, too much is bad.

The issue I see is it just makes tribalism very easy. And it's very easy to abuse this. Even countries with more than two parties only effectively have two either via major parties or through coalitions. America just has their coalitions under two big umbrellas (Biden and AOC in the same party? Trump and Romney? Those would be different parties in many European countries, but under the same coalitions)
The one thing I'd really like for web layout is a "stretch unit" that works similarly to CSS Grid's fr units in that it would be defined as "taking up a proportion of available space after other siblings have been sized" except:

- It would have no automatic minimum, so it would actually be equivalent to minmax(0, 1fr) (this would make it much more performant, avoiding the exponential time complexity of many existing CSS layout modes.

- It could be used for the width/height properties (and potentially other places such as margin/padding/inset)

If you had that along with a simplified 1-dimensional display mode (i.e. like flexbox except with the flexing disabled) then I think most people probably wouldn't want much more in most circumstances.

Houdini is interesting, but as someone who has spent a lot of the last year implementing a web layout engine [0], I'm a little skeptical that JS is ever going to be fast enough to really compete with built-in layout modes. It could be an interesting use case for WASM if the problem of passing data into the WASM VM cheaply (perhaps by reference) can be solved.

[0]: https://github.com/DioxusLabs/taffy
No idea where you live but this is probably 99% of highways in the US. Where do you live that the highways are illuminated?
What is your email client of choice? What specific IMAP features are missing from Proton Bridge that you need in order to use it?
great insight!
Also, being a coveted occupation ensures that there will always be a pool of people fighting for it. Scarcity drives demand.
The GitHub repo now contains (1) Links to Google Colab for examples + small-scale evaluation; (2) Jupyter Notebooks for small example + small-scale evaluation;

Colab links:

- GPT-4 Example: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1Bk9uBCBvzuX00Rex-t1...

- GPT-4 Small Eval: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1_-uHvW2oLtcCXz0c-G_...

- Claude 3 Opus Example: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/105jUAGanp7ZLG-Q9Hei...

- Claude 3 Opus Small Eval: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1-IH68TUuqf_CZyptSSr...
Best practice when releasing source code generally is making sure no one left API keys, etc. in source code. (Obviously you never check secrets in in the first place, keeping them separate, but it's still worth automated and manual review before releasing.)
The GitHub repo now contains (1) Links to Google Colab for examples + small-scale evaluation; (2) Jupyter Notebooks for small example + small-scale evaluation.

Colab links:

- GPT-4 Example: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1Bk9uBCBvzuX00Rex-t1...

- GPT-4 Small Eval: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1_-uHvW2oLtcCXz0c-G_...

- Claude 3 Opus Example: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/105jUAGanp7ZLG-Q9Hei...

- Claude 3 Opus Small Eval: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1-IH68TUuqf_CZyptSSr...
You mean solely for the deplatformed, and not necessarily free speech for anyone else?

Edit: I was banned for saying Ashley Babbit was committing a crime and that we should not have double standards where she is a martyr but George Floyd can’t be.
> quite funny at times.

Yes. The part where he was put in charge of the "trained" (i.e., completely untrained) mules and the "teamsters", (many of whom had lied about their credentials because teamsters got to ride on the wagons rather than humping a heavy pack on foot) made me laugh out loud.

I believe it's on Project Gutenberg for free.
Masks don’t protect against viral licenses either. IP isn’t a valid claim to withhold the source. Security needs to be managed outside the code via vaults and other runtime secret stores. There’s no leg to stand on for not releasing the entire code consistently.
What are "daylight running lights"? Is that the same as parking lights?
What I meant is that I believe it’s just a rules engine. A set of predefined if-then actions humans created. I don’t think it’s a trained neural network making its own decisions.

That’s sort of my personal demarcation. Ever since the term got hot people have applied AI to everything from things for simpler things for far more complex. It’s not quite as easy to talk about as it used to be.

I know that seems like a lot of sensors, but in my mind it’s quite simple. GPS knows where it is. Using that it can look up the laser scan map that was previously created. From there it knows what the highway SHOULD look like. The cameras can see where the lanes are, same as systems have been doing for more than 10 years. It can check that those match the map and get some fine-tuned guidance that way. And radar lights at see how close it is to the car in front and if it is getting closer or not.

Just to be clear, since I’m not sure what I wrote was, the laser scans are not being done by the vehicle. They were done by Ford. For the vehicle it’s just a data source to consult that’s more accurate than a standard GPS map.
They should email compliance@sfconservancy.org, the non-profit that is currently suing Vizio and previously represented Mastodon in this case.
That's not IP, that's secrets. IP needs to be included.
I found the First Street climate abandonment report to be the most insightful of their very good reports, crystalizing something that I find so difficult to appreciate the implications of- that many of these risks, across fire, wind, flood, etc are property by property, and block by block. Tipping points, whereby groups not impacted take signal from those impacted, are the narrative fulcrum that a lot of climate reporting tries to find, yet the granular complexity makes it nearly impossible to distill them without over simplification.
That's astonishing I thought light has the facility to (self) interact in wonderful non linear ways.
Depends - as I learned when I moved to the US at least some of my mental maps are based on where the sun is in the sky (and the sun and moon are upside down there) took me a few months for it to all turn around in my head, there are still parts of the first places I visited which are backwards in my mental maps 40 years later
By "launcher", do you mean the CUDA kernel? How can it avoid accessing the input data since it needs access to the characters based on the offsets?

I also already pass these offsets to the threads as `Part* parts`.

I also probably didn't understand your suggestion and am drawing a blank here. So pls feel free to elaborate and correct me.
Many only accept it because there is little choice but do so if they wish to pursue the profession. Despite what you may think, many are not in it for the money, but genuinely enjoy their work (but wish it was fewer hours) and helping patients.

In the U.S., some hospitals are seeing residents and fellows truly refusing to accept the status quo—they are voting to unionize in hopes they will be able to finally upend the exploitative system (at least for trainees).
That most often happens in one-party districts because the incumbent doesn't have to please the voters when the district would never go for the other party.

The two party system itself is caused by first-past-the-post voting. In that system if there are more than two parties, the two most similar parties split the vote and both lose, giving them the incentive to merge together instead of running against each other, until there are only two left. Score voting/approval voting fixes this.
They say as much in the readme
The other mastodon instances voluntarily chose to refuse to peer with Truth Social. Maybe they should show their face in court too.
Why did you ban me then? Just like Free Speech Extremist all over again, can't actually live up to the claims you make.
Which language do you refer to when you speak of python's typed sibling?
What's the work culture like at Truth Social? Are you guys mostly remote? How many developers are there? Are you hiring a lot of new people? Is there an ideological current to the workplace culture?

I won't be applying, but I'm genuinely curious what it's like to work at a company in such a unique situation.
If someone makes a cartoon or modified illustration of the Statue of Liberty ... would the USA (or the Port Authority or the Liberty-Ellis Island foundation) have grounds to sue and claim compensation?

A million transgressions are waiting to be brought to justice, and a dozen a day are being added to the pipeline.
> We can use whatever source of inflation we want. Nobody is selecting for us. But, as it happens, CPI is the one we've chosen as the default. If we change our minds, we don't have to default to it forevermore. It's up to us.

a) Who, specifically, is "we" in this context?

b) What is your information source for these facts?

> Beyond interest rates, it doesn't mean much to Average Joe.

What is your information source for the meaning contained within the minds of the average Joe? Please be specific, please at least try to speak truthfully.
Hot Take: there should be no Q&A. Best-case scenario, the questioner uncovers some omission that the speaker tweets out later. Average-case is irrelevant questions or some super-specific case that makes the speaker question if they can bill consulting hours to the questioner. Worst-case is giving a self-aggrandizing questioner a microphone to attempt to upstage the speaker. None of these are a benefit to the audience except in the first (uncommon) case.

Just go find the speaker later and ask questions if you have them.
> so there was infinite inflation from 1700 to 1960

Infinite is exaggerating but the US dollar has lost >95.0% of its value since the 1700s. So that observation is technically wrong but intuitively is fairly reasonable. If you assumed infinite inflation since then you'd be accurate enough for casual conversation.
If you don’t like it just ignore it. Just let all of them echo each other lol.

I have to do that with X because I joined and I’m bombarded by lunatic shit because it forces me to follow Elon when I sign up.

All these social media sites suck.
We get 10% time every 6 months to work on some personal growth goal. I’ve learned Swift & SwiftUI, Electronic circuit Design, computer vision. I’ve thought of trying to dive into VR a bit, or Raspi CM Carrier module for the upcoming year.

I try to just find stuff that interests me.
I'm surprised they basically choose to ignore explicitly made CAA records, if they don’t match any of their CAs. Why bother with setting up CAA records at all if they will be silently ignored?
The "funny" thing, though, is if you hadn't been using FSD at all, you probably never would have seen him at all, and he wouldn't have crossed until after you passed. FSD slowing down is what caused him to think it was safe to cross, because he thought "you" saw him. But you -- very reasonably! -- thought the car was slowing for no reason, and you might have hit the guy had you manually accelerated sooner. Not saying this was your fault in the least. Just thought it was interesting that FSD -- in a very strange way -- could have actually caused you to hit a pedestrian, even though it saw the person and did the right thing.
Just curious, does AGPL require actively publishing the source code, or making it available upon request within a reasonable timeframe?
> I'm saying that "do not kill" is falsifiable.

I sincerely do not understand what you mean by this. Are you talking about whether the phrase exists?

I also just noticed this from above:

> The difference between a fact and an opinion is falsifiability.

The technical, most essential difference is whether the related proposition is true, is it not? Falsifiability is a requirement to have a chance to reach truth, but it does not guarantee it can be reached, and it does not upgrade an opinion to truth.
> That will all come down over time.

So will interest, as more and more people realise theres nothing "intelligent" about the technology, it's merely a Markov-chain-word-salad generator with some weights to improve the accuracy somewhat.

I'm sure some people (other than AI investors) are getting some value out of it, but I've found it to be most unsuited to most of the tasks I've applied it to.
are you saying that europe has a structure that supports much better military tech than the us?
Someone's not a fan of Batman.
A lot of people enjoy their career. They went to school for ~20 years to prepare for it. Having interruptions in your career of many months and suddenly having to limiting your investment in your career in addition can put your career on the backfoot especially in a competitive environment. This is why in most developed countries poor people have a lot of kids. They have no career to disrupt. They have jobs. Very wealthy people get staff that takes care of household and watched kids. Educated, middle and upper middle class has a career to lose and cannot afford comprehensive, around-the-clock staff.
Perhaps a Cost of Thriving Index?
https://manhattan.institute/article/the-cost-of-thriving-ind...
I've got a symmetric gigabit.

I could have five but what would I even do with it?
Iran's recent missile and drone strike on Israel seems largely symbolic, likely a response to internal pressures after Israel's airstrike on their Damascus facility. This controlled retaliation shows Iran's attempt to manage national pride without escalating to full-scale war. A strategic move more about sending a message than causing real damage.
Software calendars are so poor compared to this. There’s no concept of importance, of impact, of life. Just times and titles, every one equivalent. Digital calendars have hardly evolved since the palm pilot.
> Depending on what you're watching, you might never come across a video with good subtitles but rather Youtube's auto-generated subtitles.

Even with very little correspondence to the actual dialogue, if you already know what you're looking for, you can probably find it pretty easily in the auto-generated subtitles.

ctrl+F won't work in that case, but reading will.
Interesting that the article doesn't mention what seems to be an obvious takeaway if you believe that interest rates explain the gap between CPI and sentiment: raising interest rates to fight inflation will make people feel inflation is worse.

I'm suspicious that this isn't mentioned because Summers and Roy are inflation hawks who've advocated the Fed raise rates and the alleged fact that people will experience this as increased inflation at least in the short term is politically inconvenient for them, even as they'd like to claim inflation is worse than the CPI says so they can claim vindication for their hawkishness...
My understanding is it requires active publishing, but I'm not a lawyer. Here's what I believe to be the relevant section

> 13. Remote Network Interaction; Use with the GNU General Public License.

> Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, if you modify the Program, your modified version must prominently offer all users interacting with it remotely through a computer network (if your version supports such interaction) an opportunity to receive the Corresponding Source of your version by providing access to the Corresponding Source from a network server at no charge, through some standard or customary means of facilitating copying of software. This Corresponding Source shall include the Corresponding Source for any work covered by version 3 of the GNU General Public License that is incorporated pursuant to the following paragraph.

I'm particularly looking at "from a network server at no charge, through some standard or customary means of facilitating copying of software", I don't believe "upon emailed request" qualifies.
I would argue that daytime running lights is the cause of many cars driving without taillights. In the US, DRL are only forward-facing. Nothing rear-facing is illuminated.

Drivers that have switched their headlights to the off position, the DRLs are "bright enough" to drive and not notice your headlights are off.

I see them very often, and for some reason a large portion of them are Hyundai. Maybe because the dash light, button backlights are independent of the headlights, so there's no real indication inside that your lights are not on, except the switch position.
Why would it be too late?
Well, I myself had heard of Moorcock before this. I’ve never read any of his fiction, whereas I’ve read some of Tolkien’s (and they made us read The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe at school, but I never finished it.) But, for Moorcock, I read his interview with Andrea Dworkin, [0] and also a speech he gave at a conference commemorating her. [1] In fact, when I hear his name, Andrea Dworkin is the first thing to pop into my head. [2] I doubt I’m very representative of the general population, however.

[0] http://www.nostatusquo.com/ACLU/dworkin/MoorcockInterview.ht...

[1] http://www.clarechambers.com/andrea-dworkin-commemorative-co...

[2] https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/how-we-met-...
Yes, Reagan the fiscal conservative who tripled the deficit and national debt:

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/shared/minitext/e...
> Remember in 1963 only the man was working, and typically supported 4 kids, a wife and often parents in the home.

Yeah, and unless they were like, a doctor or a lawyer, they were living in borderline poverty.
It's about copyright in that ignores normal copyright rules. Falling into public domain (or equivalent) after x years is standard in the EU and most every other country.

If it's determined to be allowed in the EU other countries can go wild with what they consider cultural symbols. It's now a stash to cram in anything you don't want ever falling into the public domain. Disney would kill for a similar loophole in the US.
Failures of Kindness (2013)
What reason is that in this context?
Can you provide some more detail about the application? I'm not familiar with how llms are used in business, except as customer support bots returning documentation.
Looks like they block any Singaporean IP.

Sorry, you have been blocked
You are unable to access fordauthority.com
This is probably the most condescending comment I have read on HN all year.
Creality has open-sourced at least some of its 3D printer designs.

https://github.com/CrealityOfficial

Maybe worth a look to see if the parts are available where you are?

Even if not, you'd probably learn a lot just by trying to hack one together from the parts that ARE available.
Seriously though. This is trivial to fact check…
Pretty good! Relatively small team (between 10 and 100), biased toward senior with a few ~5 year more intermediate people, mostly remote across the US although we do have an office and try to get together monthly to quarterly. Ironically, lots of open source contributors. We are hiring for a few roles but mostly just being opportunistic rather than needing to hire. Remarkably little turnover for a tech company. We've all worked at multiple other places made the conscious decision to make this a good place to work.

Biggest challenges are supporting multiple platforms (iOS, Android, Web), all the backend infra, etc at scale with a small team -- i.e. normal startup stuff. Also the perennial challenge of doing new features vs. making things more robust.

A lot of info in the SEC filings as well as news articles (many of which are predictably biased for partisan reasons).
> Not at all. It's the reason we have literally everything we have. This is the type of person that society needs

I think this misses his point. I believe the despair is precisely that we dont need speedrunners and such. And that its not benefitting is like the mattress spring expert is.

> There is no meaning or purpose

If you believe this, then surely you can understand why he would feel despair over something that justifies itself in there being no meaning nor purpose.
I feel like EU is ahead of the curve here with cookie pop-ups. In order to comply don't you have to go out of your way to block EU viewers? At least that's how it seems to be handled by ones that care, la times I believe was one example.

And I know some of their other policies specifically call out fining based on global revenue, not EU revenue.
A reference to “Careful with that axe, Eugene”

Another appear of an ax in a Pink Floyd song is the “ Run to the bedroom, in the suitcase on the left, you'll find my favorite axe,” from “One Of My Turns”
Net neutrality is pretty silly as a regulation, and most economists are against it.

You are right that net neutrality, and competitive markets (and thus low prices for consumers) don't really go together.
Carmack: I regret not doing more to support and defend PalmerLuckey at Facebook
On what basis?

Can you expand on what legal obligation to peer you believe they have?
Not sure. I don’t see ads.
I think that Infiniband was previously an open standard, but over time only Mellanox was in the market ( as other companies stopped making product) and they were then bought by Nvidia.

I don't agree with Jim Keller in that absolute highest performance is found in Infiniband, not only with bandwidth but latency.
You are mistaken. Lying about a products capabilities, trying to pass off something that isn't might work for a while but eventually people find out (evem with heavy marketing) and word gets around.

When you are selling something, you must be absolutely honest with what you are delivering. If you can't do it don't put it on! Not delivering makes you lose trust.

Scott Wu's option is here is to keep the lie going or just throw in the towel and say hey AI was a hype it's good at summarizing text and descent code assistant but its not going to replace human software engineers for a long time.

Which do you think he's going to take? Whichever is going to result in $$$.