skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah they’re fond of flagging in my experience. It’s kind of a cult for the emotionally unintelligent and/or wealthy programmer. Lots of lonely people in need of a belief system and finding one in statistics, longtermism, techno-optimism, techno-doomerism, and Spock/Sherlocke style “Bayesian” reasoning. Much of the research done is very overconfident (and reductive, as you mention). They make very bold assumptions, casually throw out contradictory results as outliers, make massive leaps to hypothesis which sound more like science fiction than science.

They personally really creep me out. The personality types it attracts seem really impressionable and lacking in a healthy disrespect for authority. Also seem to be a lot of Wolfram types who simply ignore criticism rather than admitting a mistake. Fond of the sound of their own voice.
I literally have no idea what you are talking about. What "basic browser behavior" are you reimplementing that React is blocking you from?
Moreover there are many attempts to codify morality: religions. We would not describe religions as systems of ethics, even though they involve thinking about morality just as much as feeling.

For me, morals are axioms. Ethics are the theorems built on top of those axioms.

For example, moral: do no harm, the Hippocratic oath. Ethics: a surgeon should wash his hands before he operates.

If you’re a soldier then “do no harm” isn’t going to work as an axiom so you need something else.

Every system of ethics relies on a basis of axiomatic morality.
So Google's business model of having ads in the search results was problematic even before they started spying on the whole world to enable larger profits from targeted ads?
Scan and share!
> defines a labyrinth as having a single path that draws towards the center.

Celtic labyrinths are just like this. See, for instance, Solsbury Hill: https://www.themodernantiquarian.com/site/2455/little_solsbu...
California. I have multiple multi-gig fiber options available and they compete.

https://www.sonic.com/residential/internet

Looks like the prices must vary by location. They don’t have a price there.
I mean, when I was doing homeworks in high school all I was concerned about was finishing it in the shortest time possible, everything else was irrelevant, lol
I prefer an editor that works how I want it, and so I use my own editor because I found I spend less time tweaking my editor that way than I do trying to bend an "off the shelf" editor to my will (I started writing it when I realised my emacs config was more lines than it should take to write an editor).

Sometimes it breaks. That's fine - I can fix it trivially. But because it's my own, I also put up with things in it I wouldn't otherwise, because I know how to work around it.

I also get a level of pleasure from gradually taking more and more control of my own tools that I'd never want to give up.
That the potential of a future FCC reinstating it precluded ISPs' baser instincts?

Their goal was to avoid excess, so maybe they could argue that net neutrality wasn't a good idea anyway, so they could gradually introduce new revenue streams from apps/platforms.
GPT is basically useless for Godot 4
The Programming Massively Parallel Processors textbook has a chapter on histograms. You have basically mentioned the main trick though (privatization).

For this problem I think coursening would also help (so everything isn’t queued up on the copy to global memory)
> The driver is not bypasses. This is a patch to the official open-source kernel-driver where the feature is added, which is how all upstream Linux driver development is done. [source code modification] is a weird way to describe software engineering. Making the code available for further development is kind of the whole point of open source.

My previous comment was written with an unspoken assumption: Hardware drivers tend to be very different from other forms of software. For ordinary free-and-open-source software, the source code availability largely guarantees community control. However, the same often does not apply to drivers. Even with source code availability, they're often written by vendors using NDAed information and in-house expertise about the underlying hardware design. As a result, drivers remain under a vendor's tight control. Even with access to 100% source code, it's often still difficult to do meaningful development due to missing documentation to explain "why" instead of "what", the driver can be full of magic numbers and unexplained functionalities, without any description other than a few helpers functions and macros. This is not just a hypothetical scenario, this situation is encountered by OpenBSD developers on a daily basis. In a OpenBSD presentation, the speaker said the study of Linux code is a form of "reverse-engineering from source code".

Geohot didn't find the workaround by reading hardware documentation, instead, it was found by making educated guesses based on the existing source code, and by watching what happens when you send the commands to hardware to invoke a feature unexposed by the HAL. Thus, it was found by reverse-engineering (in a wider sense). And I call it a driver bypass, in the sense that it bypasses the original design decisions made by Nvidia's developers.

> [turning off IOMMU] is not a P2PDMA problem, and just a result of them not also adding the necessary IOMMU boilerplate, which would be added if the patch was done properly to be upstreamed.

Good point, I stand corrected.

I'll consider stop calling geohot's hack "a bypass" and accepting your characterization of "driver development" if it really gets upstreamed to Linux - which usually requires maintainer review, and Nvidia's maintainer is likely to reject the patch.

> [large BAR] is an expected and "optimal" system requirement.

I meant "turning off (IOMMU && large BAR)". Disabling large BAR in order to use PCIe P2P is a suboptimal configuration.
Sure, if you compare a pickpocket with a rapist, the pickpocket is still bad.
There’s a reason for that. Neither Google nor Facebook are infrastructure providers. Infrastructure is a different business, and, since it frequently has natural monopolies, we regulate it so to provide the greatest good for the public and maximize stability and functionality. Infrastructure is an enabling foundation for competitive enterprise.
How is "carbon dividend plus carbon tax" different from "cap and trade"? C&T seems to have gone very out of fashion, but it also seems to me to be the most equitable approach — I don't follow this closely enough, maybe I'm missing something.
My own. It's not in a suitable state for others at the moment - it makes assumptions about e.g. running in a tiling window manager with support scripts tuned for it, and a few other things specific to my environment. I intent to clean that up at some point, but it's just not been a priority.
Thanks! That indeed sounds like it rules this out as the reason why it was found.

Curious that asymmetric crypto isn't even the slow part here. Feels like they just messed up somewhere (but I don't have the low-level asm/C skills to check that without considerable time investment)
Fair. I guess I assume:

* someone has read or at least scanned my speaker bio

* folks want to get straight to the content

* my expertise is shown by the fact I'm speaking and the content I'm conveying

But maybe I'm wrong.
I know there’s a gun pointed at my head, but listen, nobody has pulled the trigger yet, it’s fine.
It's not clear that shipping the sugar to where the cacao is, then shipping refrigerated chocolate is any better than shipping unrefrigerated cacao mass to the North where it's milled with sugar.

Especially if you look at grid emissions in all those countries. Transport uses energy, but so do milling, tempering and packaging.
> Well they sort of do already — typically you pay less for water for irrigation (usually because sewerage is metered by water usage and obv if it goes on the lawn it’s not going down the drain).

Aren't you paying more for your lawn water then?

If your sewer bill is based on your water bill[1]: a gallon of water for drinking results in a bill for a gallon of sewage treatment, which you'll use. A gallon of water for irrigation results in a bill for a gallon of sewage treatment which you won't use. Caveats: maybe you pee on the lawn, probably you perspire, sewer pipes are leaky: some of your sewage escapes out, some of your irrigation water escapes in.

[1] this is common, but I don't think anywhere close to universal; even ignoring lack of universal municipal water and lack of universal municipal sewage. Flatrate by connection size is also common. Approximately zero households have individual sewer meters, but some commercial/industrial customers may have them so they can be billed on actual usage.
Has the quality of the average programmer dropped? I look at the state of software I use in my day-to-day, in computers 100,000x more powerful than the computers which ran Win3.1...
OR, (and I know this is near heresy) you force the infrastructure operator to allow competitors to use their infrastructure regardless of whether it is fair to that operator.

This isn't a schoolyard playground. We don't have to play fair and treat these megacorporation with kid gloves. When the shoe is on the other foot, corporations don't play fair with us. "Fair" doesn't even come into the picture when they are in the conference room deciding their prices and terms. So why should the government treat them fairly when it comes to a regulatory solution?
>If a network theoretically prioritized phone calls

This already exists and is an example of a good use of priority. Cellular networks offer Voice over LTE and this is inherently prioritized over all other network traffic. This is done specifically for E911 but also implements special settings so calls can continue to go through even when coverage is very poor (and where VoIP apps would start to fail).
I usually flash an about me slide for about 15 seconds. In general, some context/web site/etc is useful. Much more than that is not. Even if you're a supposedly important person, I'm probably not that interested in your life history. And if you're that important, I probably already know something about it.
I missed the part where the person describes that they have a very large development team which justified a non-monolithic architecture. True microservices (with independent development and inter-service contracts) are a reflection of the makeup and scale of the development team. Using true microservices for performance reasons is a misnomer these days: A modular monolith (one codebase that can be deployed into multiple independently scalable services) makes much more sense when the dev team is not big enough to justify the added overhead, but some aspects of the application require independent horizontal scaling.
I expected electricity grids to do that. Different prices for EV charging, for home use etc.
I live in sweden and can pick from roughly 30 different ISPs where I live. I don't live in some big city, but in a smaller village. There is tons of room for competition if the laws are set up to push for it.
Here's an example:

"Barrels of Jefferson’s Ocean Aged at Sea® Bourbon travel aboard ships that visit ports all around the globe. The constant motion of the sea churns the whiskey, increasing its interaction with the wood of the barrel."

https://jeffersonsbourbon.com/jeffersons-ocean-bourbon/
Conflating React with webpack is disingenuous at best.
>extraordinary claims

Nothing extraordinary, in fact if you have been following the development of JS VM for the past 10-15 years this should have been well known.
It's you managers who have a poor work ethic. They are unable or unwilling to distinguish between work and rest, between what you are paid to do and what you are not.

I'm glad that this sort of thing has never been a problem in my working life here in Norway. And I feel sympathy for those in the US for whom it seems to be a continual problem
We do this for the null hypothesis - is uses an LLM to bootstrap a binary classifier - which handles null easily

https://github.com/lamini-ai/llm-classifier
And yet many history podcasts such as Mike Duncan's "History of Rome" seem to do fine in the format.
A password and a hash are fundamentally different concepts...
Your comment makes absolutely no sense in this context.
Most countries are somewhat familiar with english slang, such as the word dildo.
Have you... Ever seen a tree?

And what happens when the wind blows?

Shaking and raking are hardly different in kind.
With T-Mobile, I get free MLB and Netflix - both are things I normally pay for.

I wonder if net neutrality becomes law, will they have to stop paying for me to access those services? If so, that would be a bummer.
Arriving at Airport Lounges: Peloton Bikes, Nap Pods and Caviar Service
rare words are out of vocab errors in vectors

Especially if they aren’t in the token vocab
You’re attributing historical choices (or choices that happened before .NET even existed the way it is today) to inherent qualities of technology in the current situation.

This is flawed logic and I assume people upvote it for visibility rather than genuine agreement.
Ethics has also a meaning different than the study and development of morals.
I've written Ruby for coming up on 20 years, so to be honest I haven't paid attention to what is written on that subject in recent years - just kept up on the tools.

Bundler shouldn't be running inside a trap context, but you might be running into a situation where standard input/output from the actual process triggering your breakpoint has been redirected. In that case, ruby-debug[1] is a good option, as you attach to it from outside[2]. Basically, run "rdbg --open yourscript.rb" and then use rdbg -A from another terminal.

You use Pry remotely too[3] if you prefer.

[1] https://github.com/ruby/debug

[2] https://github.com/ruby/debug?tab=readme-ov-file#remote-debu...

[3] https://github.com/Mon-Ouie/pry-remote
The prosecutor's job is not to determine guilt or innocence, but to argue to state's case to the best of their ability and let the judge decide.
> It turns out there's actually kind of okay competition in this space. Maybe not as much as there should be, but prices have stayed reasonable, broadband access is expanding, and people by and large don't seem bothered by data caps when they're subject to them

lol. This is better attributed to you getting used to the shitty situation you, and everyone else in your country, is dealing with. Your speeds are shit and you're paying too much for them, and those "not bothered by data caps" just don't know better anymore.
It's up: https://youtu.be/Qw22utZ8IlY
avoid floats (fixed point arithmetic saved quite a bit of space)

Can someone help me understand how this works? I thought JavaScript uses doubles for everything. Is WASM completely different in this regard?
So instead you’ll give money to Google, which totally won’t do shady stuff with it?
https://brisk.news/read/articles:kzd0xs9ky05g37ownf2q
I stand corrected. If it's already suboptimal in practice to begin with, the hack does not more it more suboptimal... Still, disabling large BAR size is still sub-optimal...
Logs being stored in binary is the main problem, I think.
Transcript: Ezra Klein Interviews Dario Amodei
Thanks - I only just realized I didn't understand this, when I thought about it. I'm rather gratified that the answer isn't simple and obvious; I didn't understand it because it's beyond my intellectual capacity, not because I'm ignorant, and I think that's an OK excuse.
Gen as in “General” not generative.
That’s nice I guess, but these should be progressive enhancements and the page should still work without JavaScript enabled.
The being too precise reduces accuracy example makes sense to me based on my crude understanding on how these things work.

If you pass in a whole list of states, you're kind of making the vectors for every state light up. If you just say "state" and the text you passed in has an explicit state, than fewer vectors specific to what you're searching for light up. So when it performs the soft max, the correct state is more likely to be selected.

Along the same lines I think his /n vs comma comparison probably comes down to tokenization differences.
This is strange conflicted space for me. Were this the case, Disney would have had to produce nothing but original work, which would probably benefit us today but would leave us without the eventual cultural heritage that they produced (if it can ever be pulled from their claws). I'm coming more and more to the conclusion that public domain is very much like other idealogical freedoms I was raised to believe in, which is to say beautiful conceptually but possibly messy and requiring potentially painful sacrifices on the part of individuals if consistency with the ideal is the goal.
That's the point. A large sailing vessel takes the same crew and moves way fewer tons.
My wife has very poor navigation skills, but is currently completing her second masters out of six degrees. So pretty smart, I guess.

But she's also really dyslexic, and we've wondered if that could have anything to do with it.
Umm....

Nope, I've been using it a secret weapon to get my kids to read and give them a good vocabulary and all these "concerns" seem imaginary.
Apparently some amendments were passed, and not-so-good ones! Here's an article that says which ones they were. https://cdt.org/press/u-s-house-vote-narrowly-allows-rampant...
Most people view ISPs as a utility provider, so it should be expected that people would be annoyed at the idea that they get to double dip in the profit.

I pay my electric company (the ones that create the infrastructure to make an ISP possible and have massively innovated in the process) the same for kWh if it’s for a lightbulb or my work laptop
+1 for Claude Opus, it had been my go to for the last 3 weeks compared to GPT4. The generated texts are much better than GPT4 when it comes to follow the prompt.

I also tried the API for some financial analysis of large tables, the response time was around 2 minutes, still did it really well and timeout errors were around 1 to 2% only.
Valve's unusual corporate structure causes its problems, report suggests (2023)
I color code mine. Yellow if I’m listed as an optional participant, blue if I’m required.

I don’t attend the yellow ones.
What buffer for solving delays would you consider acceptable for that mode switch? Train schedules are inherently fragile because there's so much interdependence. Every tiny bit of the trip is locked into a signaling segment block time slot and one train causing a shakeup leads to wild butterfly wing effects fanning out in all directions. Rail networks in places that have more than just a trivial amount of service tend to run very close to saturation, even if they don't look like that at all. But you can't cram trains on a line like you can cram cars on a highway (or planes in an approach pattern), that's just not how safe signaling for wheel-on-rail works.

And no, I won't accept "but it works in Japan!" as a counter, because Japan does not really have anything resembling a train network. They have a number of lines going up and down one corridor, plus two appendices branching off to the west coast. Compared to that, even the French star of lines separated by metro rides appears complex.
New in Basecamp: References
Very well written and very different written than what we usually consume.

I suggest everyone to take those 20 minutes
Correction: Physically attractive people tend to have an easier time in general at everything in life that involves IRL person-to-person interaction. Try going to interviews with missing front teeth and see how far you get.

Thank you for attending my TED Talk, now feel free to spend that research money on curing cancer instead of studying obvious things humans knew for hundreds of years.
350 tons as compared to a heavy freighter with 50,000 or 100,000 tons cargo.

By all means let's get more sail area these big guys and save that 30% fuel, yes.
I recall that being an extremely hard and fast rule on my brief foray into urban exploration.

Never ever have anything that could be construed as a weapon or burglary tool. Even if all you did was walk through an open door it makes it far too easy to build a case for breaking and entering, instead of much milder trespassing.
It is very much experimental, though at this point I've been using it nearly exclusively for 6-7 years, I think, and I'm very happy with that.

The "problem" mainly that it works well enough for me, and I've had little incentive to make it work at all for anyone else.... Though now that it runs in my own terminal, I'm thinking of unifying some of the buffer handling for both the editor and terminal and splitting that out as a gem, and once I've done that and rewritten some of the (currently rather inefficient) rendering and syntax highlighting code (the syntax highlighting uses Rouge, which is fine, but I have a mountain of things on top that I'm slowly cleaning up so they're reusable and somewhat performant) it'll start to approach usable for others...
Shame this was flagged. A discussion of a spicy argument over search (one level away from the argument) should be allowed.
The size of Pileated makes it so special to see! We're fortunate to see one a few times a year - my wife saw one this week but I didn't make it upstairs in time to get a glimpse.
Right. And because you said so, I'm supposed to believe it. Man, as a former Data Protection Officer, I can tell you that you're asking for a lovely fine.
The main benefit over DDG is the ability to customize search results. If you have no use for that, Kagi is probably not for you, and that’s fine.
> someone has read or at least scanned my speaker bio

Probably not.

As I wrote in another comment, a quick context-set and contact information in probably useful but quick is the operative phrase especially for any background that isn't directly relevant to the material at hand.
I really want to see optical processing become mainstream as quickly as possible. Not just for AI, but in mainstream PCs as well.
I'd change the second example from "knows is innocent" to "believes is innocent".

If the prosecutor "knows" they're innocent, then their argument against would be either untrue or purposefully withholding crucial information, which would make it an unethical argument.
The FCC did that with DSL. The incumbent telcos retaliated by not maintaining their copper plant and killing their own line of business as an ISP.
4-5-6 of course.
BTW why are you saying that it was? Can't you still be using it? I am not a desktop Linux user myself but it sure should be possible?
Oh wow, this is a fun website. Thanks for sharing!
Are you running on top of twilio? Where do you get your numbers from?
I have a maybe dumb question: why FBI investigation? Does FBI investigate people getting on the bus without a ticket?
Tiktok would beg to differ. Starting a new social network is hard, but bandwdith/net neutrality is the least of your problems.
You might be thinking of "terminate and stay resident" programs, like Borland Sidekick :p
Maybe. If they can talk about the topic once I've explained it in a way that makes me convinced they're a fast learner. I'd take a fast learner over someone who knows more but I'm not convinced can go much further almost any day.
Yup. Twiddlybobs look nice and gain WAF, but a thick mesh of sensors and a plan work a lot better. Zigbee TRVs are a good midpoint for balancing monitoring and control.

FWIW I still use Hive for boiler control but HA overrides that locally for fine control.
Sort of related: "GSMA Open Gateway", specially the quality related APIs.
There used to be boat service between Toronto and Buffalo. That lake could be a good candidate as it connects two sizeable cities. Even if just used for goods transport? Heck, Toronto to Niagara or Hamilton could be a thing. Even better if there was good transport to get to one of the international airports on the last leg. Water shuttle from Toronto to Hamilton and some other quick transport to the airport there.