skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Looks neat! Seems very limited though.. like you can't even insert multiple lines in one request?
You can see what projects they are following on GitHub (notably rust compiler, some embedded platforms, etc)
I wonder if some (or all?) of this scorn is due to LotR's pop status - many probably consider it the pinnacle of fantasy without having read through much else in the genre of that era; for many more it probably is everything they know of fantasy. His works are indeed special but there are some really great authors like Eddison, Peake, and Leiber (and Moorcock, I suppose) who don't seem to get much recognition.
Fortunately svg and (x)HTML aren't too horrible in being able to sanitize scripts or if. The use of CSS's access notwithstanding.
You might be surprised by how big you can scale up: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caspian_Sea_Monster

That said, no one seems to have found a practical use for the technology.
Nsh: Command-line shell like fish, but Posix compatible and written in Rust
Very cool. I love the idea of source as DLC. I might need to give it a go after failing to build my own game in Godot.
libsystem is such a bizarre abstraction covering far too much surface area. The name alone is a code smell. Why is the same library used for both internal service management and for services implementing on-demand launches and notifications?
Yes, crypto-boys for example. If the reward is 1B USD in crypto stolen from wallets why not do spend a year adding a backdoor ?
If I just eat an apple after my meal, my teeth retain a sqeaky clean feeling. Don’t know how replicable this is but I highly recommend trying it.
x86 motherboards usually come with a 10Gbps onboard NIC.

It's the standard. I don't know what kind of world you live in to convince yourself it's exclusive.

100Gbps is also available pretty cheap, but typically only as a separate card.
So assuming your machine supports UEFI, what are the common use cases that systemd-boot would not support, requiring you to use grub?

Encrypted boot partition I'd guess? I tried that once with grub, but it was unbearingly slow, because grub did not / could not use modern x86 extensions to do the decryption. So not a common use case either, maybe a desirable one.
Big corporations are pushing more and more ads, FOSS developers are being exploited... but a Solo-Developer charging 4€ for an App that'll likely never make a return on his time-investment anyways: that's sad.
Certainly Here's The
Literal historical books written by historians describe these events in details.

> There are a lot of sources that do support the claim that no law was broken,

Not really, there are not. Most sources just simply do not go into details.

> and that judges could challenge the nazi agenda. But they didn't. Were they bought, intimidated, convinced?

In the actual stage I am writing about, no they could not oppose anything. Violent crack down on any political opposition happened right after takeover of power. The first nazi victims were pro-democratic and left wing politicians or sympathisers.

Moreover, lower government was overfilled by ex-soldiers, per law. That made them biased toward whoever they perceived patriotic and generally right wing.

> It's not really my job to prove it.

No body is asking you to prove it.
Another famous one: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Ponte_Morandi_collapse
This has also led to the preservation of many of the games I grew up with. There's still a market for NES and Atari consoles and a market for the cartridges because you can still play and use them.

It's going to be a very different story for modern consoles.
See also why suborbital rockets could actually be competitive for passenger travel over very long distances: no air resistance in space.
This. All you do when you download a game is perform the initial cache update of its binary and asset files.
There's a non-zero chance that a mandatory change in the user-facing language allows them to set reasonable expectations after parting with some of their money will result in more users choosing to support content which they actually will own
> What is this obsession with the past and the early days of computing? The reason why people don't cherish these types of things is they are rational. Technology is about tomorrow. It's not about yesterday

The full stupidity of this is only clear when you realise that almost everything that is considered "technology" today was invented between the 1950s and 1970s. Most of what is invented today is about refinement and scaling of ideas that were developed many decades ago.
"An incredible leap", more like an over-hyped trend to get money out of venture capitalists.

In practice it's a recipe for spending large amounts of money on GPU cloud compute to achieve things that could have been done just fine with more traditional methods.

> And what exactly did you mean by:

> "Computer Science still puts the same restrictions on what we can compute."

Computer Science is the science of studying what can be computed, what is the complexity of those algorithms, what are the limits of our logic and mathematical models.

We know there are some true statements that cannot be proved to be true. We know there are algorithms that we cannot prove whether they terminate. We know the complexity bounds in solving a number of problems or getting suitably precise approximations.

Our computers are bound by the same constraints than a Turing machine is, and those constraints are well-studied. LLMs haven't changed the capabilities of our computing systems.
Nice, Normal Girls Don't Get Their Genitals Pierced (2015)
What is the selling point of your solutions versus something like Baserow ?
I sense some connection to the concept of [the right level of abstraction](https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2018/09/04/the-right-level-of...)
LOADLIN with UMSDOS certainly brings back memories.
... can you really fault software that has "Grand" and "Unified" right there in its name for trying to be just that? The number of systems supported by GRUB is really impressive, the number of special-sauce features supported (filesystems, RAID levels, snapshots, etc.) downright staggering. And if you don't like it, there's plenty of alternative, simpler options with a narrowere focus. I use systemd-boot on most non-Debian (which supports A LOT of other platforms, mind you) x86 EFI boxen of mine.

GRUB might be an unnecessary complexity for a number of use cases, but it's a solution that strives towards being universal (which is also a goal of Debian). I think it comes rather close, and I am happy it exists. Learning you way around it for an hour or two will yield payoffs down the road.
Is the H-1B lottery selection transferable to another employer?
The point was "don't take away users' ability to run their own servers"
Yeah, I think Ruby represents the end of the line for the one of the main ideas of Smalltalk: that everything should be the same thing. Classes are objects, objects are hashes, have fun. The problem is that programming is primarily about making distinctions. This is a user, that is a product, and they are not the same thing. When everything becomes an undifferentiated soup it's hard for the programmer to figure out what's going on, which leads to bugs, and it's similaryly hard for the runtime to figure out what's going on, which leads to slow code.

More modern approaches have clearer boundaries between different systems. E.g. compile-time metaprogramming has much more structure than Ruby's runtime metaprogramming.
What is unreasonable about not wanting your news organization to be ripped off for free?

What is reasonable about OpenAI’s “we learn fairly from everyone’s IP, but paying customers may not train competing models with outputs we gave them?”

Imagine you paid a teacher and they said you weren’t allowed to teach someone else what they teach you, while they are actively teaching you things that other people taught them, and they’re so new at teaching, you wind up teaching them. Seems legit
What's simpler than Postgres?
And rather misogynist, and monarchist, and a boatload of other things.

Many of those I'd write off to Tolkien being a product of his times. At least his heroes seemed to have many ideals which are still accounted virtuous.

Tolkien's monarchism, though - even in the days of the Old Testament, it was obvious that hereditary monarchy never, ever worked for long. Because the heirs of great men always regressed to the mean. Pretty damn fast. (After King George III, Britain mostly solved that problem by turning their hereditary monarchs into mostly-symbolic figureheads.) And Tolkien served in the hellish trenches of WWI - a war which dug deep, dark graves for both hereditary monarchy and European superiority.

Hmm...in many ways, I could argue that Tolkien's fantasy writings were mostly escapism for him - to a old-fashioned romantic utopia, where "land of milk and honey, and the kingdom is powerful and prosperous, and the king is always good" was at least possible. And consider the massive decline in the real Britain's fortunes between Tolkien boyhood (~1900), and LOTR's publication (~1955)...
The Nautilus Expedition [video]
Where did I say Kubrick was infallible?

And my argument was more than that he's acclaimed. You seem to have entirely missed the point, and I don't know how I could have been more clear.

Would you respect the skills of a coder who disrespects Richard Stallman, saying he doesn't know enough about open source software? Or an economist who thinks Marx didn't understand capitalism, citing their own work in a bank as proof?

One person made appeals to authority (themselves) while being disrespectful in this thread, and it wasn't me.

It's not an appeal to authority to say that Kubrick made the most beautifully framed movies, by a long shot, of any director ever. It's about as close to objective truth with such a subjective question as possible. Ask ChatGPT to tell you who made the most beautifully composed movies! I did - it told me Kubrick.

To say that Kubrick tried too hard, and could have got the same result with less effort, is bananas. It's clearly untrue on its face, because no one else ever has gotten the same result with less effort. It demonstrates a damning lack of understanding & appreciation for the art form. Which, by the way, is actually pretty different to photography - adding time changes the game.

You can say Steve Jobs could have been nicer to his employees - and you'd be right. But you can't seriously claim that you'd have gotten the same results with less effort, citing your experience as general manager of a tech store. Would you hire such a guy as your PM?
That's true, I had missed how popular they had become. My brother briefly lived in a wooden apartment building around 2017 and after they moved out I noticed a few criticism of the new wooden trend. Then I just lost track of it.

The trend goes back to 2014 even, so it wouldn't surprise me if this wooden bridge built in 2012 was part of that whole wave.
Sure. But that does not answer any questions about their tooling or methods. Considered a business secret? They present the readable C code of the binary payload like it has appeared just out of the blue.
I never understood why people prefer

class << self over class self.method, the former adds more cognitive load in my opinion.
Great, thanks for the response. I'm using off-the-shelf radiator TRVs (Aqara SRTS-A01) which use some internal PID program based on the supplied actual and desired temperatures and I experience similar fluctuations in room temperature.
But it was removed from AMO. That was an issue as people that installed it from AMO just stopped receiving updates silently. You had to uninstall it and re-install the gitlab version for the auto-update to work again.
I wonder if they do blameless post-mortems..
It has rigor, yes. But OP complain in full was " I think I focused too much on rigor, too soon, and didn't give myself enough chances to sink my teeth into it with initial easy wins."

Draw a box is giving you wins from the day one. It is pretty much opposite of doing things too soon. The thing with other beginner resources is that they kind of assume you already know how to draw, you know fundamentals and build on that. If you actually cant, they put you into loosing position.

> The first part of it worked great for me, as I am spectrummy and dont mind grinding as it puts me in a flow state, but I only stuck with it up to the 250 box challenge.

I did intended to suggest op should finish it. I think that part up to the 250 challenge is the part that is sort of the key - it gives you basic fundamental skill to draw lines where you want them to be. Plus by that point you see there is systematic analytical approach to drawing and can build on that.
“Plenty”?
Have to say with my background individual room control and measurement always seemed the nirvana, but it seems like a lot of heating design is moving away from this to more constant input / constant loss with outside temperature curve adjustment. Take a look at heat geeks.

You’ve got quite a complicated system there. Some of the key design parameters are about getting balanced flow (proportional) rather than bang bang controllers so that you optimise the delta flow return and operate the heat source at lowest realistic flow return values for efficiency.
A few of these French magazines have cult status these days : Tilt, etc. I wonder if that's the case in the English-speaking magazine world.
I assume the person didn't mean "need" as in "can't do without it", but instead as in "I can make clearer code with it than with the alternative approaches".
It’s pretty much the same with Wayland, everything is just a “surface”.
Imagine all the back doors people haven’t discovered…
Why did I get the downvote?

I want to know because this is the approach I took, and I genuinely hope that sharing it can benefit others. Yet I sense my suggestion may not be as helpful as I'd like it to be, and welcome ideas and improvements.

My guesses as to potential causes:

1) I suggest committing crimes to get learning materials

2) I suggest very hard work / very difficult topics, right out of the gate, instead of hobby grade projects

3) self teaching this stuff might be an iffy prospect

4) self teaching /while winning and executing contracts/ could require a decade of pre-existing manufacturing experience

5) I didn't lead with ERPs

Yes, I am being somewhat snarky. However I genuinely welcome insight here. I want to become a better mentor for people like myself, and potentially OP, who are blazing the hard trail of non-standard careers in manufacturing.
Unified Multimodal Decoding of Brain Signals
Especially in closed source software where nobody has an incentive to look, any performance hits will be ignored, code analysis tools can't be run (why bother - can't exactly sell it as a new feature)
do you have any reference to that? because i don't have that impression at all.

what risks do you have when employing, other than spending more money? if you stop earning money you can let people go. i did that without problems.

in a weak job market, entrepreneurship is often the only option. developing countries have some of the highest numbers of self-employed people. since there is no job security either, the risk of failure is not really relevant, because often the alternative is unemployment. and they are very aware of their families depending on them. that's why they are doing it.
“GitHub Verified”.
So I’ll say that I absolutely echo the post and general comments.

I’ll also say, which I feel is a pariahable comment in 2024, that with 18 years of dev exp through the cycles of Web 1.0, 2.0, everything being a SPA, server-side rendering craze, and then wherever we are now, I just don’t get the hype around React for 95%+ of the scenarios it is used for. It is just so much more harder to get things done, to maintain them, to skill up. The complexity just feels superfluous. Like the Weekend at Bernie’s situation that is “agile methodologies” these days, my gut says this current world of tech must be far more shaped by economic and organisational factors.

By contrast, on face value alone, something like Svelte feels so much closer to how programming used to feel.
Not rinsing also leaves all the food residue, germs (dead or alive) and debris that has collected in your mouth throughout the day. Not rinsing my mouth after brushing feels like showering and leaving the soap on.
The video you linked literally recommends looking at the references. Sycra in general recommends refences all the time.
I don't think the article's even suggesting that - interesting you took it that way.

But, if it reduces fear that could increase performance which it's reasonable to assume could increase your chances of escape. What do you dislike about this? Do you have something against hallucinogens?
Depends how many FTP sites it's mirrored on.
> Maybe software copyright should expire when a company dies

Why just bankruptcy? I'd say any software copyright should cease when the owner cannot or will not continue supporting the software to work to the level of functionality from purchase or at discontinuation, whichever is higher.

So even if a company still operates but isn't keeping your purchased software working (as-is operation, not security patches or new features) at least at the level from when you bought it or when it was discontinued, then the software should become open under reasonable conditions. Free for personal use, maybe a reasonable licensing cost for companies who want to keep supporting it commercially.

There are probably many corner cases that would need to be addressed to not become a vehicle for abuse but it would be a good start towards not making software unnecessarily obsolete.
https://pastebin.com/Sep9zKjw From Mistral Au Large this week
I always enjoy this article when it makes the rounds, but I'm still unreasonably annoyed about two points.

> Despite this capability being mentioned in countless reviews of the success story of Windows, the actual functionality of it is almost entirely undocumented online.

Much of this was already documented online in 2020. https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20111107-00/?p=91... and https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/q/791/278 are examples. (https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20211129-00/?p=10... came after this article was written, but is worth reading too.)

> while you can probably tell me the name of the OS installed on Macs in 1985, and you can definitely name the most popular way to run multiple DOS programs on the PC in 1995, you almost certainly can't name a DOS task switcher or multitasking environment offhand.

DoubleDOS. And I've never used it: I know it by reputation alone.
…with a headless browser, I suppose. Which is not ideal.
a comment from YT reads: another decade another ground effect vehicle. this' been going for 60 years now.

of course it is quite unclear how is this applicable for harsh conditions in open seas where waves can be scary high (or deep if u prefer).
I’m not sure there is a formal definition, but it seems that Veblen came up with the idea because he was thinking about conspicuous consumption, which is slightly more specific.

It’s not that the high(er) price itself makes the product desirable — it just happens to help tell the right story about the product.
You can even put a button on a sheet to trigger a script
High-Performance, Low-Cost, Additively Manufactured Ion Source for Mass Spec
The privacy policy is also well written. I didn't know you could not have a cookie pop up.
It's way ahead has been for some time. I saw it nearly 13 years ago in my internship and have done primarily .NET stuff in the interim. It's only gotten better with age, dotnet core and new features.

There are gaps - data ecosystem is dominated by Java/Scala/Python. Numerical computing is dominated by Python (used to be R!). Microsoft has a decent story in their own ecosystem for the former. Their work on more numerical data types, generic math, and more are what I think is the start of bringing numerical computing to dotnet.

Can't wait to see what the next 13 years hold.
Looking at the response from commenters who say they were affiliated with VCF and the amount of flagged comments here, I’m inclined to believe that it was indeed an insult.
Could a married couple get their own E2 visas individually and then get each other on a dependent visa to have an open work permit?
Awesome! Only one tiny typo: It's "ECB" rather than "EBC" :)
> But you can't raise the price on a low-quality product and expect a great sales response.

Well… obviously.

My point wasn’t that raising the price is always a good idea; it was that it sometimes is. It’s worth mentioning because even the idea that it’s sometimes sensible is surprising to many.
https://brave.com/blog/google-gdpr-workaround/

Google DoubleClick/Authorized Buyers is installed on 8.4+ million websites. It broadcasts personal data about visitors to these sites to 2,000+ companies, hundreds of billions of times a day. The data can include people’s locations, inferred religious, sexual, political characteristics, and what they are reading, watching, and listening to online. There is no control over what happens to the data once broadcast. This appears to be by far the largest leakage of personal data ever recorded..

The campaign for GDPR action to fix the Google and IAB real-time bidding system now includes Brave, the Open Rights Group, Dr Michael Veale of the Turing Institute, the Panoptykon Foundation, Bits of Freedom, Eticas Foundation, Exigo, Dr Jef Ausloos of the University of Amsterdam, Pierre Dewitte of the University of Leuven, Liberties.eu, the Society for Civil Rights, Digitale courage, Digitale Gesellschaft, Netzwerk Datenschutzexpertise, Deutsche Vereinigung für Datenschutz, the Italian Coalition for Civil Rights and Freedoms, the Bulgarian Helsinki Committee, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights in Romania, the Italian Coalition for Civil Rights and Freedoms, the Estonian Human Rights Centre, the Peace Institute.
If you have to concatenate a literal string across multiple lines, try to ensure the break isn't inside an interesting substring someone would search for.

This is called semantic line breaks and is also important to get (admittedly more naive) diffs sensible.

https://sembr.org/
Are you being argumentative for the sake of it?

The statement was that someone had a really bad day.

The implication that people are driven by money and nothing else, or even that they have no right to feel like they had a bad day if they were paid, is absurd.

Nobody is saying that you should be sympathetic. It’s just an interesting comment: An interesting thing to think about. A worthwhile contribution to the conversation. This was someone’s very bad ending to a very long project.
Shader code though, that's a different story.
Manipulating Large Language Models to Increase Product Visibility
If you really want this to change, have kids.

Note: this is bad advice.
Have worked with .NET for several years and I'm happy to say is an insanely good option, and it's miles ahead of competition when it comes to serving a specifc profile of programmer. UX, APIs, docs, tooling are generally of very high quality. If as a programmer you do not ever want to get involved (good luck getting a change landed), and don't care to understand much of what's under the hood just want to read good docs and get back to your usecase, if you like automation as long as it's written by someone else (how many .NET devs can build a project without VS or even care to know?), if you're happy to confine your dev skills to the inside of a box defined by MSFT, there is no close second option.
This is a real storm in a hissy teacup stuff. One guy's coveted old computer magazines is another guy's paper recycling. Maybe the author should have first checked to see if these were any use better elsewhere.
To your point: From the original post it was mentioned they created an entity in Germany (for the T-shirts).

This means they're exposed to GDPR not only indirectly by serving EU citizens but also directly by operating within the EU.
If not undoing mistakes from the 90’s…