skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Here's how I've dealt with procrastination, in case anyone wants to try these ideas out:

1. Clarity: Knowing steps/milestones/end goal helps scope/know what needs to be done for something to be 'finished'. We tend to think about this when delegating, but the same applies to personal work. If I know details about what I need to do it's more likely that I don't get stuck and look for something else to do/distract myself.

2. Conviction: related to point 1. Most of the time if I'm somewhat excited about what I'm doing, procrastination is a non-issue. When I'm not, I try to write a bit to figure out what's keeping me from going full force. I start with the prompt "What don't I believe about what I'm doing?" and end up thinking bigger picture and finding details I'm not entirely sure about. This gives me stuff to clarify, look for data, etc.

3. Beating myself up: unlike points 1 & 2, this is harder to fix as it's not mechanical in the sense that I can open a new doc and start writing. In my case, a lot of the aversion from tough tasks comes from feeling bad with myself when I could not complete something or failed at it. To solve this, I have worked with my therapist, metta meditation and practicing positive self-talk (or catching myself when I think or say things like 'oh how dumb, it was just...')

4. Self-confidence: this is iffier. Part of not beating myself up involves appreciating myself. Basically, thinking positively about myself like I do of people who I admire or friends I like. Compared to people who love me or respect me, I was very harsh on myself and did not treat myself with the respect others would.

5. Intuition: once the self-confidence thing kicks in, I feel free to do stuff without even thinking about it. This allows me to get into flow. For example, I have started using document templates without giving it much thought (because if I already do it it must be good enough, I guess?). This has helped me speed up how I write and give structure to things. I didn't use to do this but now it's second nature as I'm not questioning anything about what I do. I know this sounds bad in the big scheme of things but when dealing with tasks/small stuff, letting whatever comes out flow speeds up work and makes it more fun vs second-guessing myself. Meditation helps here, as I disengage from ruminating or thinking about random stuff or objections that may not be relevant to what I'm doing.

Anyway, a lot of this stuff is related to the OP in that they reduce anxiety. This issue is close to my heart as I have been battling with it for years now and am now in a spot that makes me proud.
Does anyone know of any good video Emacs tutorial that start from the very beginning to, say, org mode?

I can use basic vi, have for a long time, but can never make sense of Emacs and probably my impatience doesn’t lend well to reading and trying..
Ask HN: What is the SaaS stack used in your software development process?
I'm guessing almost all dev teams use Jira for bug and feature development and Miro for collaboration?

What else are you using?
We found it by investigating the security of SSH as part of a larger research program focussing on SSH, which also resulted in our publication of the Terrapin vulnerability.

This particular bug basically fell into our hands while staring at the source code during our investigation of the security of SSH client signatures.
Our brains are very weird, but there's a lot of common weirdness. There's a pretty wide range of common 'weird dreams', for example driving from the backseat, mandatory test or you'll be ungraduated from high school where you haven't been in 10+ years, various flying/falling, the tetris effect, etc.
Any links to the cases of the following and how they weren't part of regulatory capture?
Lol

no - it's Splunk :)
TP (and Delphi) was such a great language. A lot of the benefits of a compiled language without all the complexity (accidental complexity for 80% of projects) that C++ pulls in.
how are they offering this at discounts from the original? looks like the goal is to get subs to cover for the most frequent users?
Child care is so expensive in NYC that it's become a crisis
> different languages have different grammars

Obviously. It should be understood that the idea is to have a standard AST API/format _per language_. As such it would be standard practice to provide this information as part of the parser/compiler library.
> making everyone appear at exactly the same location would be nigh-impossible, though.

I don't think this is actually the case. In a spoofing scenario, all of the rogue signals would typically be generated by a single terrestrial station. The time of flight of all of the generated signals will be the same, so all that matters is the position solution reflected in the transmitted signals, as the fundamental principle of GPS based on TOF is no longer in play. So I'd think that in a typical spoofing scenario, all receivers thinking they're in more or less an identical location is what you'd expect.

It might be possible in a borderline case for the receiver to receive some spoofed signals and some real signals simultaneously, in which case you'd expect weird results, but I think you'd definitely see a correlation around the position being broadcast by the spoofer.
None of that is particularly relevant to the claim that a small efficiency improvement is automatically worth the capital cost when there's no competitors.
Well, you know, that's, like, your opinion, man.
1984 by accidental convenience
It can though.
"Normies" don't know what QoS, DNS, Peering, or route tables are either, but all these things are part of a stable internet connection ...
I am on a corporate desktop, so I cannot use the Microsoft variant of the ssh-agent:

C:\Users\luser>ssh-agent
unable to start ssh-agent service, error :1058

Obviously, getting that changed globally (or even for myself) is impossible.

PuTTY has a workaround, allowing PAGENT.EXE to be used in place of the forbidden/inaccessible Microsoft agent:

https://tartarus.org/~simon/putty-snapshots/htmldoc/Chapter9...

So PuTTY remains quite relevant because of the mechanisms that Microsoft has chosen.
>I think I must be misunderstanding

It reads that we are speaking past each other and I think the misunderstanding comes from your consistent reframing as the choice between two bad outcomes. I've already commented that dichotomous thinking isn't helpful. So, again, I don't think there are only two options: a) let someone get scammed and b) let someone get abused. I think that kind of thinking is incompatible with finding good solutions.

But...since you keep framing it that way...I would say, between the two, allowing someone to lose money is a better outcome than making it likely that someone will be beaten while being imprisoned against their will. In a (falsely) dichotomously framed argument, there is a clear hierarchy. Physical safety trumps money. "My kingdom for a horse" and all that.

I think the best option for the person in TFA is to get proactively involved in providing systemic solutions. If they aren't up for that, the next best option is to ignore the calls. I wouldn't even put the "scam the scammers" in the same discussion because, as we'd talked about ad nauseam, it's not really a solution and probably antithetical to a solution because it potentially makes things worse. Again, at the very least, we can not make things worse. You seem to be advocating for the "making things worse" choice because you've constrained yourself to only two options and you already decided that one is unacceptable.
Im working on a model to do just that :) The game of life is not too far off either.
The technology is interesting but the billing doesn't convince me. I don't feel that I can scale storage easier with Neon than using just a bigger server with plain Postgresql.
On Linux it's more about what can be done. Agree that server users don't care about microkernels.
There's no human that could create a CPU from scratch in two weeks because the concept itself is nonsense.

This is like the guy on Twitter who threw MRI scans at Claude.

Or Juicero.
Parallel Distributed Processing (PDP) was a subgroup of CogSci and Neuroscience researchers who were using a neo-Connectionist approach to modeling cognition.

Geoff Hinton was a early member of this group of MIT, UT, UCSD, and CMU psychologists, CogScientists, and CS researchers

The core research of the PDP group is what became CNNs, which are what truly enabled LLMs (as most can trace their origins to the work done on BERT)

One of Hinton's earliest papers in the space: https://stanford.edu/~jlmcc/papers/PDP/Chapter1.pdf
When these ARM boards start coming with UEFI and I don't need to hunt around for blessed OS images with patched kernels I'll be a lot more interested, until then I've got to stick with x86 to maintain my sanity.
While I'm not sure I would claim it is practical, playing around with eaglemode is fun. It is available in the AUR among other places

1. https://eaglemode.sourceforge.net/screenshots.html
2. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eaglemode
> I don't have tinnitus, but I do have this thing where when I'm falling asleep, my eyes (despite being closed and in a dark room) will start to feel like they are looking at a brighter and brighter light. This is very irritating for me.

Me too, just started happening recently too. Brains are weird.
Plus good time overlap to hand over ongoing issues - there's a reason why there's an uptick in deaths at shift change time...
Let's not forget that BASIC used the colon.
If the hosts are under your control, and never connect to untrusted hosts, then you are ok. The user authentication is encrypted, so the signatures are not visible to a man in the middle.
Because it would cover cases where things end up in federal court because of diversity jurisdiction. Some circuits (e.g., the 9th) have ruled that state anti-SLAPP laws apply in such scenarios, but other circuits (e.g., the 5th) have ruled that they do not apply.

Not uncoincidentally, X (a Nevada corporation whose HQ is in California, and whose ToS and presumably all other contracts generally say CA is the proper jurisdiction) filed its lawsuit against Media Matters (a Delaware corporation whose HQ is in DC) in, uh, Texas.
I found it incredible that such brilliant and attractive people would be dumb enough to risk it all for the relatively paltry gains that embezzlement can earn. I kept looking to see the underlying motivations...

In one of the Star Wars movies, Luke takes a starfighter and flies to another planet, pursues training with Yoda etc. I'm pretty sure the other timelines in the movie don't reasonably match up and I don't recall this causing a big hullabaloo.

What people will blithely accept in a popular movie tells you something about their mental processes. It tells you something about how tolerant they will be of half-truths and stories not quite adding up IRL. And some people like exploiting that fact for some reason.

They usually have an excuse -- "I'm some minority group or other and we never get a fair shake." But the reality is, as the author says, they just like it for some reason.

Most people have partial info and make decisions based on simple rubrics, not comprehensive overviews of some unknown future. People routinely see what they want to see -- "Look! Free money -- again!" -- and blithely ignore inconvenient truths -- "Oops! Arrested again."

Comments suggesting "right to be forgotten" is problematic are correct. It typically just teaches people they can get away with it.
I don't know how accurate this is.

I don't think there's any evidence that things have to be evolved in the tech world.

paradigm shifts happen all the time.
"It's just too hard to get people to radically change their workflow, and tbh the current one isn't even that bad."

Gmail's update last month mandating use of Javascript radically changed workflow for me. The difference in speed and resource consumption for me against the faster HTML version is significant, not to mention an increasing cluttered interface. Over time, people get used to the slower speed. Very sad. More of our time and resources stolen by a so-called "tech" company. I thought I was free from this nonsense when I quit using Windows decades ago. I was wrong.

Gmail serves Google first and Gmail users second. When it wants to make changes that benefit Google, it can make them, no matter how "radical". Why. Because it's too difficult for Gmail users to find an alternative mail provider.
> Financial entitlements

???

> various medical services

I pay hundreds of euros each month for health insurance I expect something in return

> higher welfare rates

Anecdotally none of my neurodivergent friends are on welfare. But I imagine people with more severe types of autism cannot really function in a work environment. That's why it qualifies as a disability.

> Accommodations, such as extra time on tests

Never got it

> a more comfortable working environment

Ahahahahahaha

> more attention and time having school staff attend to them

You're tripping

> Affirmative action schemes.

???

> Exclusion from military drafts.

I don't know anything about military

> Extra leeway in social situations in general - in specific ways.

You spelled extra bullying wrong

> second order effects

What the fuck are you even yapping about?
boring! UCSD p-code is a stack based virtual machine. WASM is a stack-based virtual machine. Converting one to the other is an interesting project.
I am happily using the free tier to help launch my startup. It is invaluable to me. I am a big fan of it, and have no regrets with this decision (only 9 months in). I admire what I am allowed to have for the low price of 'free now, pay when you need to'.
So many factors, but the gist is the market was really really bad last year.

Now I'm making more and I'm pretty comfortable.
Friendly reminder you can entirely disable elliptic curve algorithms in your sshd_config and generate rsa keys larger than 4096 bits, 8192 or however large you like work just fine.

I have never trusted EC crypto because of all the magic involved with it, a sufficient reason to move from RSA has never been presented with compelling evidence as far as I am concerned. I do not care that it is faster, i prefer slow and secure to fast and complicated. It's a lot easier to explain RSA and why it's secure than the mile long justifications on curve crypto. The issue doesn't need to be in the algorithm, if the implementation is sufficiently difficult that works just as well as an intentionally misdesigned algorithm.
How are folks running 8x22B (or MoE in general) in an affordable way?
edit: ignore below, I misinterpreted what q meant in this context and thought it was the private key.

>The clever trick is to compute a secure hash whose input includes the message to be signed and also the private key [...]

> PuTTY's technique worked by making a SHA-512 hash, and then reducing it mod q, where q is the order of the group used in the DSA system. For integer DSA (for which PuTTY's technique was originally developed), q is about 160 bits; for elliptic-curve DSA (which came later) it has about the same number of bits as the curve modulus, so 256 or 384 or 521 bits for the NIST curves.

I know hindsight is 20/20, but why did PuTTY implement it this way to begin with? Given the description in the first paragraph, I'd naively implemented it as

SHA-512(message || private_key)[:number_of_bits_required]

or if I was being paranoid I would have done

SHA-512(SHA-512(message) || SHA-512(private_key))[:number_of_bits_required]

Moduloing it by q makes no sense unless you're trying to save a few cycles.
I use Org but markdown-mode can hide subsections too:

markdown-mode supports outline-minor-mode as well as org-mode-style visibility cycling for atx- or hash-style headings. There are two types of visibility cycling: Pressing S-TAB cycles globally between the table of contents view (headings only), outline view (top-level headings only), and the full document view. Pressing TAB while the point is at a heading will cycle through levels of visibility for the subtree: completely folded, visible children, and fully visible.

(Quote from the link shared by parent.)
> quantities of risk

Even that’s asking for a lot.

Qualities of risk is more likely.
The third worlders doing this themselves often bot or run bot farms.
I think they mean you can't, "mute the ad, and scroll down and read the comments (no longer seeing the ad, because one is scrolled down and reading the comments)", not because one can't mute the ad, but because scrolling down now, instead of showing the comments, shows a bunch of video recommendations.
We recommend against ECDSA for internal accounts. I know several of our partners use it though. Hard to not be cynical about this even though this issue seems mostly harmless.
Is it really negativity to call this ugly?

https://ibb.co/pfJSdxn
Pageant is `ssh-agent`.
> You don't need to brute force the almanac - why would you?

I have no idea, but the claim was that you get faster fix with brute force when I know that's not why it's fast in practice.

> But it's very much feasible to 'brute force' your initial signal lock by searching for all gold codes at a range of frequency offsets.

I hadn't even imagined this constituting "brute force". Is my phone using "brute force" to find the WiFi router? At some point it's not really "Brute force" it's "There are a handful of options, try all of them" and GPS seems past that point especially on modern hardware.

This actually reminded me of a (possibly no longer extant) design choice in Encrypted Client Hello - we don't necessarily know if the encryption was done with key F we gave out yesterday afternoon or key G which we just began using an hour ago, do we need a way to signal that in the connection? No, just try all valid keys. If you can't afford to try more than two keys, make sure you only roll them slowly so you won't need to.
> nor 'conservative' like Paxton is supposed to be - no idea if he really is but that is besides the point.

This is (intentionally or unintentionally) comedy. (If intentional, the subtlety is magnificent.)

> Paxton rose to power as an ally of the Tea Party movement[3] and has been described as an ultraconservative[2][3][4][5] or far-right[6][7][8][9] politician. As attorney general, Paxton has appointed prominent opponents of LGBT rights to leading positions within his department. In June 2022, Paxton said he would defend state laws prohibiting consensual same-sex relationships if the Supreme Court precedent invalidating such laws, the Lawrence v. Texas decision, was overturned.[10] He has sued president Joe Biden's administration nearly 50 times.[6][9]

There's just no way to know!
I agree completely. I am baffled by the support that this and other "rails to trails" initiatives get around the world. At a time when we are trying to decarbonize, we should be investing in modernizing and upgrading the existing railway infrastructure, not scrapping it for recreation. This is a vanity project. California has enough hiking trails. It has too many cars and not enough public transport.

A similar project is underway in Ireland [0], where they decommissioned a large number of former passenger lines in the 1970s, and are now spending millions of euros converting them to "greenways". To give one example, the Youghal to Midleton "greenway" replaced a former commuter rail line connecting commuter towns to Cork City. Every day, thousands of people drive between those towns, resulting in traffic jams and unnecessary CO2 emissions. Re-opening the train line would be a no brainer, they have more commuters today than ever before. Instead, residents now have the option of cycling or walking along a desolate trail through a bog.

[0] https://www.corkcoco.ie/en/resident/greenways/midleton-to-yo...
Because Lexus had to justify the F-Sport package which added zero performance improvements, so they bolted on some shiny metal.

The 2017 RX (and even the latest RX) is about a decade behind in technology compared to Tesla & the German manufacturers. When you invest very little into R&D, you can afford to add shiny metal bits.
it's a novelty but a fun novelty. check out Eagle Mode
Ketosis is an interesting topic. There's also emerging research suggesting that it can play a role in the development of cysts for those who have APKD (Polycystic kidney disease). [1]

[1] https://www.cell.com/cell-reports-medicine/fulltext/S2666-37...
The only feature of IMDB I use is cast info: explore movies where an actor played, then from a movie jump to another actor.

Is it something you are building to track contributors across projects?

I already see how I would be even more solicited on LinkedIn...
They were using keto for epilepsy as far back as the 1920s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketogenic_diet

Then drugs came out and everyone ran for the quick fix.
If you sort the states by percentage of British ancestry, it’s pretty much a list of places that are “the way the American republic was designed to be”: Utah, Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, Oregon.
IMO: These days, it's hard to see a reason for learning this stuff by rote memorization when ChatGPT is already so, so good at it. You just give it a sample few lines from your text file and tell it what you need the output as, and it'll break down every command and parameter for you, whether that's a complex regex or a bunch of piped commands.

Man pages in (in its training), results out, all expressed in natural language. Seems more useful than an old-school curriculum, TBH...
Once again, California exceeds 100% of demand on its main grid with
We need both efficient businesses, with their large economies of scale, as well as efficient markets, which reward innovative efficient businesses by allowing them to get larger.

The trick in any attempt to create economic policy like taxes is to balance these two needs of capitalism, and right now the balance is sorely in favor of the former against the latter.

Small efficient businesses are being bought by larger ones (and are often taken apart), reducing their impact on the market by reducing their ability to threaten larger businesses. Since capitalism helps people by reducing prices through competition, the ability for oligopolies to use market control to reduce threats to themselves ultimately creates market inefficiency that translates into larger consumer expenses and less common good.

Because we're experiencing oligopoly control in most market places, breaking them apart and reducing them with taxes are the two largest levers to create more market competition. I hope this makes sense.
Was this back when they had radar? Unintended braking is/was a common issue for all manufacturers - my Prius would randomly slam on the brakes whenever I went underneath a bridge.
If you own the covered work, then in some jurisdictions, you have the right to license it under the GPL plus additional restrictions (that cannot be removed under the 'Additional Terms' clause of the GPL). This was previously discussed at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30712215

It is more complicated in this scenario where GPL-licensed code written by other people is involved.
I’m an atheist, but when Ramanujan claims to derive all of their formulas from god, I ask how we can make it easier for them to listen to god, rather than feel the urge to argue against them.
This seems like goal post moving. The question was if the migration was complicated, the answer is yes.
Whether or not APFS is revolutionary or the best option is not the discussion. The core fact is that Apple needed to move away from HFS+ and they decided to move to their own FS, which brought in a bunch of changes that are standard in other OSs.

And they did it in a smooth and fairly uneventful way, so that's remarkable.
Honestly I think that's because Apple cares far more about the iOS devices than it does about Mac OS (and did even in 2017). Mac OS is a second-class citizen for Apple. The main focus is on devices, and then services.
Organize the Browser Bookmarks
Any rail alignment is a hiking trail if you keep your ear out.

Bridges and tunnels might be dicey though.