skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Why do you think a linear city would give you 20 minute access to any place in the city? Clearly travel time would increase linearly with distance.
None of that stuff actually works. You can remove someone's social security number from the data but there is still only one person at the exact intersection of all the data that isn't individually considered personally identifying but collectively it still is.

Moreover, that isn't even the problem here. Suppose your company has a trade secret. You know how to manufacture widgets more efficiently than your competitors. If Microsoft produces a model that will now tell your competitors your secret process that it learned from your internal emails, it's completely irrelevant whether they stripped the PII out of your emails first.
To each their own point of view, but I hope you see my main point. I actually like the compositions of Kubrick's films, but I don't think they'd need 100 or more takes to get right. Thus, if you take off the Kubrick equals genius blinders for a moment, either he was somewhat inept and covered for it by working through an absurd amount of takes, or he was obsessive about trivial details that didn't really matter visually. I can think of no other reasons for why it would take 100 or more takes to create the majority of his best scenes.

When I first started with my own photography, i'd often take dozens of photos of the same subject, day after day after day, trying to get my shot "just right". Eventually I noticed that this only created pointless extra revision work for me for no reasons other than that I was failing to note the difference between completely irrelevant, tiny differences and those worth adjusting, and that I was thus failing to simply compose more carefully with far fewer shots. Having learned these things, my photography became much less tedious without losing any existing quality.
The american idiots decided that EW is a joke and they have sent their fleet without any anti-anti-drone measures. Waiting for more decent tries.
Nope. Read up on the scientists who 'hacked' a way to disrupt the German radio beams that intersected over the British bombing targets around 1940. There was a book about 20-30 years ago about that famous British scientist, R.V. Jones.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Beams
> M4 with a terabyte of RAM will run GPT-4 level models locally.

No it won't. Apart from the fact that (if the article is correct), M4 will support maximum of 512 GB (and I don't want to know how many thousands of dollars you will have to spend on it given how much Apple wants you to pay for a difference between 8 GB and 16 GB MacBooks...), GPT-4-level models that you could run locally don't exist and it would be a challenge in itself to create them. The closest, Claude 3 Opus, as far as I can tell can't be run locally, and it is in nobody's interest to change this status quo (less capable models = run locally, powerful ones = pay us).

I do hope this changes one day, but it is not directly related to M4 (or M5/M6).
Poetic... https://suno.com/song/98d131b2-1ab2-428a-82ed-0dce8589c9a2
https://suno.com/song/35f78578-27bb-4ab1-8597-b6f3efe1b9aa
https://suno.com/song/31b136bd-9c17-418a-853f-1545efa18930
It's the logo of CrabLang: https://crablang.org/
Exactly, I've seen this at Sentry where you now have to run Kafka, Clickhouse, Redis, PG, Zookeeper, memcached and what have you. I get it, but the amount of baggage to handle is a bit difficult.
aren’t you reading a bit too much into it?
The name "Rabbit" almost got genericized - I heard DECT phones being referred to as "rabbit phones" just this year.

DECT in general (the successor to CT-2 which Rabbit used) is still going strong, though in some bubbles people are shocked to hear anyone uses anything other than a mobile phone.
I think it'd be more like:

For Sale: POMPEII LAURELS Residential/Commercial property, suitable for owner occupancy, with tenants in the heart of idyllic Pompeii. The property has been in the hands of a prominent local family and its spacious gardens and tastefully appointed dining area are perfect for entertaining. Price upon request.

Venalis; pretium ad petitionem?
As others have said, GUIs are the place where OOP shines. There are no things OOP does that can't be done elsewhere, what happens in practice is that programmers invent their own ad hoc object systems and start programming in an object-passing style (see e.g. Gtk).
Rabbit cages are called "hutches", which may have inspired a pun on Hutchinson Telecom.
How about 0. Those who made the mess pay for cleaning it.
> but when my brain calmed down I realized network systems in the 19th century didn't really make sense.

-Now, in the 18th century, on the other hand, the Chappe telegraph network was king. [0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chappe_telegraph
It's not like the plane is going to leave earlier if the queue is processed faster.
If you are not directly connected to China, but are to Europe, and Europe is connected to China, well... ever heard about routing?

Can your traffic reach locations you are not physically connected to?
An extremely solid and convincing rebuttal. Sad. I wonder what the Devin team will say in response, if anything. Summarizing the video:

• Devin is sold as being able to solve arbitrary Upwork tasks. In the video demo the problem it was asked to solve doesn't match the stated requirements of the customer (who asked for setup instructions, not code).

• Devin is shown fixing errors in the source of a GitHub repo, but the files it's shown editing don't actually exist in that repo and some of the errors its fixing are nonsensical, of the type that'd never be made by a human. Inference: Devin must be fixing bugs in files it has itself created, but that's not clearly indicated.

• There is no need to do any coding in the first place, because the README in the repository has all the instructions needed to achieve the task ready to go and they still work fine with only a one-line tweak, even though the repository is old. This is why the customer asked for instructions for how to run it on EC2 rather than for some coding. Devin didn't seem to read the README or understand that it only had to execute a couple of pre-existing Python scripts. The output in the video makes it look like the task was complex and sophisticated, with a long plan and many check boxes showing work completed, but the work was in fact pointless and redundant.

• Devin's code changes are bad, e.g. writing its own low level file read loop instead of using the standard library properly.

• Although the video makes it look like Devin did the task quickly, and the video creator was able to do the requested task in ~30 minutes, the timestamps in the chat show the task stretching over many hours and even into the next day.

• Devin does nonsensical shell commands like `head -n 5 foo | tail -n 5`

The strange mistakes lead to questions about what underlying model it's using. I don't think GPT-4 would make mistakes like that.

The Internet of Bugs guy is an AI fan and uses coding AI himself, but points out that the company behind it says you can "watch Devin get paid for doing work" which isn't actually supported by their video evidence when watched carefully.
> OS X does not exist anymore. It's now called macOS

So then it does exist. Otherwise it wouldn't be called anything any more.
We don’t do that.
This is so very, very cool.

I did hear some horrible news. Seems the funding for the next-gen (or even current maintainence of) Chandra-X ray observatory (space based telescope) won't get approved which is a huge shame.

Maybe politicians could be persuaded by sites like these and greater awareness campaigns to not lose such a worthwhile instrument for science.

And if it does is there an international equivalent maybe via the ESA or another that could make up for it or should the science world suffer because of the lack of US funding?
Get a better baby for the rare cases, no need to always suffer
> Remember, once "you" are data, you can be copied.

If you're copied that's what "Hang the DJ" is about, and more darkly the short story "Lena". But San Junipero deliberately doesn't do that.

Alas, the thing you claim isn't the same as being is in fact exactly how you work today. Is this an existential nightmare? I got used to it pretty quickly, and in San Junipero you'd have a lot longer to get used to it. Greg Egan posits that, to the extent consciousness is anything it's somehow a consequence of patterns of computation. That is, if somehow the same patterns that you represent came into existence again they'd "be" you in every sense that matters. The "Lena" scenario remains horrifying, all those copies are the same person, instantiated over, and over, and over again to do menial tasks. But San Junipero is just life after death.
FlatBuffers does the trick as a better replacement to ProtoBuf when running in some resource-critical devices. We were working on a project that leverage Arrow IPC (internally FlatBuffers) and shared memory to collect metrics on edge devices with limit CPU and memory, hopefully we can open source it soon.

But in this case the format is defined by [Prometheus](https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/blob/main/prompb/re...) and we just adopt that.
It's possible to use the external link search from the API, and that does have a namespace parameter. See for example https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&format=json&...
Definitely is still slang, as in “what are you rabbiting on about?”

From rhyming slang “rabbit and pork = talk” apparently.

https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/rabbiting+on
i watched that recently and though it was impressive in scale i couldn't stop thinking about all the horses that died during filming =/
You've entirely forgotten routine hardware failure. At large enough scale all sorts of weird stuff happens.
You will change your mind about China anyway if you stay, just give it a few years.
> My back seat driver solution: have cameras that takes a picture of the person presenting the boarding pass, the shutter is triggered by the pass scanner. If a pass is scanned twice, bring up the photo of the person who scanned it the first time and grab them. But it's a whole lot of tech to solve a problem that probably rarely happens.

Or do what is done all over Europe, even for domestic flights: check the passport at the same time as the boarding pass at the gate.
This game made me understand why I needed a full-size keyboard with numpad back in the days. It was such a nice game and made use of the full keyboard to 3D position your ship. No other game was doing it like Descent.

Shame we don't have innovative games like this anymore.
What I found:

753
7512
762
7152
34152
3417
357

That's the same as your solution but in reverse.

It's not possible in 4 steps or less, because if you ignore the no-duplicates-rule, there is only 1 possibility and that one has duplicates. It's not possible in 5 steps, because you would not end up with an odd length list again. Solutions will always have an even number of steps. So six must be shortest.
OpenBSD Is a Cozy Operating System
Zooming out, panning around, and seeing the milky is... jaw dropping in a way. I know it's silly because we've seen SO many photos of the universe, but I still get the goosebumps every time I think about it. And the detail too! You can really zoom in.

I tried to look for the moon, but it looks like it's not possible:
https://old.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/rwynmt/could_th...
It's a 'Golf' in most areas
One less. And you weren't installing them manually anyway, were you? Just chuck this stuff in a pre-commit or tox config and be done with it.
> I think this is great, but it strikes me as the DIY embedded hardware equivalent of what coders often do.

I think the author already knows this :-)

The primary goal in this project appears to be "fun", not "provide a cheap option for reading keypads".

I mean, the author ate the pain of learning-to-Rust-on-the-STM32, uses it for no discernible gain for a project of this scope, and for good measure adds in a home-written embedded OS.

For something of this scope no multi-task-driven design is necessary, and an 8051-or-cheaper uC with an i2c peripheral and ISRs reading with a while(1) loop writing is more than sufficient.

I attempted making and selling a thing like this (integrating 2x16/2x32 character LCD and keypad) waaaay back in 2003/2004, but the number of hobbyist uC developers just didn't make it worthwhile.

Today, with the arduino already a grandaddy in relative terms, everyone and their dog is doing embedded, so might be a good time for me to relook at all-in-one i2c peripherals for hobbyists.
>Humans made it very, very long without plastics and PFAS.

Yeah, sure. Pre-industrial population level with pre-industrial living conditions and life expectancy. I prefer plastics.
I think that approach would be doomed even in the present day. Multiple "legacy" release branches is very hard to manage. Only the very largest such as Microsoft can do it, and they clearly hate doing so and want to push to rolling releases like everyone else.
Maybe you're not thinking about it enough? Do you know anyone who has been almost fatally stabbed (attacked by gangs) with knives? I do! It likely violates a code-of-conduct and is unprofessional.
A cost-effective Intel W680 ECC server: repurposing an HP Z2 G9 motherboard
Its google cloud sql.
Nationalize the printing inkustrial complex
BSB was first (Squarials!) and Sky second and then they merged pretty early on.

Rumbelows went out of business, many stores became Escom and they too went out of business pretty quickly.
Librem 5, when all hardware kill switches are in position "off".
I have been buying 5gal water jugs from a local Seattle company until recently, with the articles on all the microplastics shedding from the bottles into the water inside.

I did buy no-plastics Aarke glass/steel carbon filter pitcher for my drinking water.

It's hard to find water filtration without plastic involved, hopefully
other options will come to the market, but their offering is pretty good so far.
> our more nimble competitors

Who was competing with Cisco in 1992? I struggle to remember. They were so dominant in the "dotcom" era (late 90s) that it felt like they were the only choice, the "IBM" of enterprise networking hardware.
I applaud his genuine effort at getting to know the subject he might decide to legislate about. As is plainly evident across decades of news, the majority of congressmen and senators do exactly the opposite, Legislating with blatant ignorance and complete disregard for the effects of their legal plastering.
Is the root cause of emergence of these currents somehow related to human activity? If yes then it sounds a bit like we are (again) blaming the knife for a killing, like in ancient Greece :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buphonia

The axe, therefore, as being polluted by murder, was immediately afterward carried before the court of the Prytaneum, which tried the inanimate object for murder, and, after the water-bearers who lustrated the axe, the sharpeners who sharpened it, the axe-bearer who carried it, each denied in turn responsibility for the deed, the guilty axe or knife was there charged with having caused the death of the ox, for which the axe was acquitted (Pausanias) or the sacrificial knife was thrown into the sea (Porphyry).
Cloudy with a Chance of Unusually High Bills
"This might have worked if the flight weren’t full"

But, if the flight wasn't full, they would probably have been allowed on, since they were on a standby pass.
I did not intend to attack Gary or so in any way. But I realize that my statement is probably too strong. Of course it's not the whole AI community. My intention with my post was just to give some perspective, some background for people who have not heard about Gary Marcus before.

Maybe I'm also in a bubble, but I was speaking mostly about the people I frequently read from, i.e. lots of people from Google Brain, DeepMind, other people who frequently publish on NeurIPS, ICLR, ICML, etc. Among those people, Gary is usually not taken seriously. At least that was my impression.

But let's not make this so much about Gary: Most of these people disagree with the opinion that Gary shares, i.e. they don't really see such a big need for symbolic AI, or they see much more potential in pure neural approaches (after all, the human brain is fully neural).
If I zoom in, I see a reddish mottled pattern. Is that sensor noise, background radiation, or something else?

Similarly, if I zoom out to 30.39 angular degrees, there's a similar-ish green mottled pattern that's very prominent. What's that? It looks like it's got linear features, which might be a stitching artefact of some sort, maybe?
I came to the exact same solution.

My feel for this type of puzzle is that there is a 'gravity' from the higher to lower value integers. So you want to help integers flow from the 7 to the 3. The state of the list then represents a sieve that dynamically restricts the flow paths from one step to the next. So at any time step your possible paths to flow the integers from 7 to 3 are quite restricted.

The first step of 753 -> 7143 may seem arbitrary at first, but you quickly realise that most other options result in long awkward paths where you move integers back and forth, or deadends.

For example, if you decide to split the 7 first your valid moves are 753 -> 6153 or 753 -> 1653. The first move still leaves you overloaded at the left most position, and you still need another split because you cant combine 1+5 or 5+3 due to duplicates or exceeding 7. So you don't really feel closer. Same with 1653, putting you in a position where all combinations exceed 7, and you need to further breakdown numbers, but you've already used up all your valid odd numbers, so you have to break 6 into 2 and 4 -> 12453. This is a dead end.

Fun morning coffee puzzle.
Isn’t it tiring to think about every possible offence in the world and how someone somewhere will be offended by (knives, tires, cars, pens, saws, sharks, planes, needles, ropes, speakers, games, … you get the point) while writing an article about a programming language?

At some point one needs to exercise common sense and learn to live in a public society where people speak and not everyone is out to offend you.
Are these passes airline specific?
No, they definitely make a society more free. The difference between being able to drive somewhere and having to walk or take public transport is huge. You can go places at your own pace rather than what's 'best for the majority', reach areas more quickly, go to areas that aren't worth connecting to the rest of the transport system, etc.

The issue is that some places (like the US) are designed around cars rather than just treating them like another form of transport. Having shops and businesses miles from homes is bad design regardless of whether cars are a thing or not. Designing on the assumption every person will drive and having thousands of parking spaces is bad design for similar reasons.

The difference between driving and not driving is between going where the government deems it worth going/getting there in a far longer timespan and getting to wherever you want at roughly your own pace. The issues come from the assumption it's the only way to travel and societies designed around that idea.
Who’s going to refill the supply of verification cans though?
So.... pretty much a game of Star Raiders?

https://ia902205.us.archive.org/15/items/a8b_Star_Raiders_19...
The Permutation City reference is irrelevant to San Junipero. I never made the claim that the entities in the simulation were not sentient. I made the claim that they aren't "you." These are very different things.

I haven't seen the newer seasons. But looking at the synopsis on wiki (Beyond the Sea?), this is a very different scenario. Permutation City might be a better one to look at for what I'm getting at. Remember in that story that you are essentially making a copy of yourself and putting it into that universe. That entity is not you, but it is sentient, conscious, and it's own thing. But you aren't in that simulation with it unless you virtually go in (and in their scenario you need to deal with the time differential).

San Junipero is a corporation promising you life after death. The same way Amazon Prime's Upload does. But San Junipero in Black Mirror itself made no claim, and the writers place a lot of not so subtle hints as to the idea that it isn't. Not only by nature of being a Black Mirror episode, but I suggest you look closer at the soundtrack of the episode and how its used in context.
Google is launching a paid version of Chrome
Yeah at this point it is much easier to exploit human flaws than computer flaws.
I'm game to build anything. What specifically did you have in mind that doesn't already exist?
The massive amounts of money is, largely, a post-2010 thing too.

Before that, some hugely successful people in software outside of "nerd"
circles were discussed often in terms disconnected with tech and more as just other (if wildly successful, like Bill Gates) business people.
Would be interesting to combine this with a web-of-trust.

None of my one-hop trusted people are part of the cancelmob. If I found that somebody two hops away from me did something absurd it's quite easy to do something about it -- apply negative trust to whatever path endorsed that nonsense.

Unfortunately people these days seem allergic to running anything that isn't a web browser or served by an app store, and the entities that control those two channels are extremely unexcited about decentralization.
Don’t coconuts also have a notable side effect if you eat enough of them over time?
This was the specific target at the time: https://spacetelescopelive.org/webb?obsId=01HTJT20C0STKNZ01K...
Where does it say that? It only says you can't go larger than the largest value.
They might already be familiar with Dave’s bassline from Eminem’s “My Name Is”. My personal favourite bit of music trivia
'Three-Body' Review: A Chinese Series Beats Netflix to the Screen (2023)
I was told of an Auckland/Oakland clusterfuck.

Think that was on buying a ticket and somehow hot noticing the vast price difference.
Thanks to all 3 :) ... Ryelang in sort of "not a concern at this stage" and "go with the flow" way currently has this idea of per project static binary with all dependencies compiled in.

It sounds a little odd at first, but besides being the simplest to implement in Go, this also solves a problem for which Python needs tools like venv, pyvenv, virtualenv, ... that also this blog post mentions. The sheer number of these tools shows that this is a problem and that maybe that the solutions aren't optimal.

It also offloads most of package management (ie. pip like stuff) to just "go mod".

A specific binary per project also has other benefits in terms of securing the running environment, I think ... I'm still exploring this.

This is not yet in focus, but maybe starting from a totally different position will make some interesting or simpler tooling possible.
> You're be[ing] extremely crass just dismissing the health of 25 people.

Sometimes it's more important to recognize whether anything meaningful has been accomplished than whether people have their hearts in the right place.

If you'll notice, I did explicitly treat player health, as opposed to concussion count:

>> The difference in effects downstream of the incident being counted ("can the player remember where he lives?") is likely to be much smaller than the difference in incidents, because for most purposes there is no difference between the pre- and post-treatment results.
but confabulation sufficiently describes the phenomenon without the need for ugly neologisms.
Here in NZ you don’t need ID. There is zero checking for domestic. Wonder how long until someone ruins that.
The constraints stated:

* You can never make an integer greater than the largest integer in the original list.
* You can never make a move that results in the same integer appearing in the list more than once.

You can make a negative number and you can go lower than the smallest but not greater than the largest, so you're wrong on both counts.