skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The offering of public services would only be pretextual if it wasn't a genuine offer, right? So I'm not sure I'm understanding your argument.

Also public services are inherently shared services. The delay time and tax payer expense to individuals to have public employees to remove the dead bodies and broken windshields of folks who didn't wear seatbelts on the freeway is an imposition on the shared enjoyment of the freeway and on tax payer income.

Likewise even assuming every injury were treatable, every person getting their thumb reattached or whatever because of a preventable injury means a doctor's time isn't available to treat other injuries that couldn't be prevented. uninsured individuals with these injuries also increase the cost of insurance (one of multiple reasons why our medical costs in the US are higher per capita). Nor is every injury treatable to that extent.

Bet setting that aside, if you really want the freedom to cut off your own fingers accidentally, I bet all the dangerous tablesaws that currently exist will become available at garage sales or whatever very cheaply, so the frugal consumer still wins.

Arguably gives a whole new meaning to five finger discount.
That’s just how things are on Windows. Building just about anything requires Visual Studio (not the UI but the tooling that comes with it. E.g. msbuild and C++ headers)

You won’t have to do this on Linux or if you use a pre-built exe
"Fine.. but for every dollar in job site saws sold how much useful output do they produce"

This is accounted for in the economic benefit calculation, and is estimated at somewhere around 650million-1billion total.

Even if you add sales + economic benefits, it's less than cost injuries.

The CPSC has done this analysis (3 times now), as have others, as part of the breakeven analysis.

It's honestly a bit frustrating when lots of HN is just like "i'm sure X" without spending the 30 seconds it would take to discover real data on their opinion.
I think there are lots of people who would like to see this technology expanded. The issues going back more than a decade has been over the licensing of the patents. SawStop spent a lot of years aggressively suing over its IP and/or pushing for this legislation so that they could have regulatory capture. That's the problem, not the concept of safety. Maybe things have changed by now and we'll be able to see greater innovation in this space.
While I was in undergrad, I volunteered at SPD’s warehouse in Berkeley for a summer. Although I enjoyed my time there, and I learned a lot about non-profits, publishing and more, I found it be a very strange, tense, and awkward place to work. And cliquey. I did not feel welcome, seen or accepted. Kind of like the Bay Area at large over the past decade or more (and I speak as a regional native).

An anonymous former employee supports the claim that SPD was a poor place to work, run by toxic people: https://damagedbookworker.medium.com/terrorized-by-spd-61201...
What would be specialized about baking a croissant? Or do you mean you put in flour and butter and croissants come out? I would pay handsomely for the second.
Not available in the UK - this seems quite common with Google lately, why is that?
There are at least two reasonable readings of "anger is eliminated", with one being true if anger is reduced at all, and both being true if anger is reduced to zero.
You're talking to someone who works with folks on the USB-IF committee. Analog output through the DP/DN/SBU pins is not standard these days. A mux isn't even necessary in many implementations. Also, this functionality in USB Type-C is straight up deprecated. Just because it's technically possible (and sure, I agree, it is technically possible) doesn't mean it isn't more costly, less efficient, and wasteful vs. just putting the codec directly in the USB-C to 3.5mm dongle.

Here's the rationale than USB-IF gave in the ECN:

>> Few hosts support analog audio accessory. Those that might could be confused when connected to a device supporting corrosion mitigation, but no detrimental behavior should be seen. This should be a corner case of a corner case so likely zero to very low ppm of this condition. Note, any compliant host that supports analog audio accessory today is also required to support digital audio accessories, so there should be no impact to users."
The use case of “counting objects” is basically completely solved already by yolov8. There is no need to use an LLM for that.
Local First (afaiu it) doesn’t have to focus on privacy, though it definitely enables it as a product use case. Outside the privacy focus, it doesn’t remove access to the profitable data (only delays it) while enabling user access patterns that aren’t reliant on 24/7 availability of remote data stores. I think there’s a clear business/product benefit here in that consumer app usage and performance aren’t tied to the users current network quality, and service availability requirements can be less stringent which directly translates to $$ (which can be part of everyone’s value). It probably introduces unique tradeoffs though, and I expect you have a good idea of what those are given you use the pattern. I imagine a data heavy local app syncing with a remote backend unpredictably is its own headache.

WRT Pouch/Couch, and this take is probably annoying to a user of it like you, but it’s an ecosystem that you need to have a reason to get into - IOW it ain’t your grandmas SQL :)
It's usable in the sense that it runs properly.
See also: https://ssotax.org/
More discussion & anecdotes: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39981034
"We made it secure by making all of our android devices poll for your location constantly." (paraphrasing)

Sorry, I appreciate the writeup - I absolutely do not want my devices doing this. And of course it's on by default.
Let me get this straight.

The court illegaly gave itself more or less limitless powers. They've been abusing those powers for half a decade now. In fact they grew so bold that they violated the constitution when they engaged in censorship of a political nature. They have exactly zero incentive to ever stop. They know that the second they relinquish their newfound powers, they will likely be tried and found guilty and held accountable, just like they persecuted Bolsonaro the second he was no longer in power. They are committed. The only possible course of action for them now is to grab and consolidate more power.

And you, knowing all this, you propose...

Appealing to the court.
>It was a much better death than having a lot of futile last-minute interventions.

It's easy to say that sort of thing, so everyone does. It makes plenty of sense.

People don't want to die in the hospital or go through hell in their last days or weeks.

But nobody wants to die right now, ever. No matter what they said before or what papers they signed.

The standard picture, the logic, makes perfect crystalline sense up until there is a choice between going to the hospital right now and living an undefined amount of time, maybe only a day or a week, but longer than the next few minutes.
Which implementation was this? Does the code linger somewhere?
I wonder if there is any correlation between cattle containing cow magnets and the strange phenomena of cattle tending to align themselves on a north/south axis.

I'm guessing that the answer is "not much" since deer lineup too and they (probably) don't have magnets in their stomachs.

I still think this deserves the Mythbusters treatment, right?

https://www.npr.org/2009/03/16/101945271/power-lines-upset-c...
Bullshit. Moro vice is vanity not corruption. Lula was freed not because he is innocent but because the mafia judges nullified the process. Crime took a significant hit when Moro was minister of justice, reduction in homicides, effective border control. No wonder that criminals and their leftists supporters hate him. The current government is incapable of fighting crime and it is thriving to the dismay of millions of daily victims. I'm ashamed of being Brazilian because of people like you.
Not if you’re sat in the back and in a crash fly forward and kill the person in front of you.
It's very consistent, check this guy, he was able to structure LLM output using Pydantic in an elegant solution:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yj-wSRJwrrc
Corporate blog posts are advertising for their brand and service. If they happen to overlap with something interesting that's a bonus.
I live in Georgia. I'm happy we built this, but I'm so unhappy about the mismanagement and the added cost to my power bill.

Despite the danger, nuclear is exactly the kind of thing I want a SpaceX-type company to tackle. Nuclear should be orders of magnitude cheaper. It should be developed at a frenetic pace, with even the scary failure modes being tolerated.

Safety doesn't matter to the degree we think it does when literally thousands of people die in traffic accidents, and hundreds of thousands to preventable diseases.

We don't even need to build near population centers to get this off the ground. We have so much space to build and test safely in complete isolation.

We're in this spot because of the decades of fearmongering from the greens and the geopolitical adversaries masquerading(!) as greens. We also have this deeply-held reverence, and perhaps even guilt, because we built the bomb.

This thinking has held us back so unfathomably much, and for nearly a century. Nuclear could propel us forward as a civilization if we'd just let go of the fear.
Straight up not true. Running my local copy it takes 5 seconds for the window to appear.
Wait, did I read that right? Are you actually suggesting that climate change is the cause of rising crime rates? If so, please explain, because I would honestly like to know how you reached that conclusion.
> I've had to replace my wired headphone cable 3 times in the last 5 years due to wear, unexpectedly each time. I still use them because my current AirPods don't last a full work day, but I'll probably switch to AirPods Max next refresh.

How many cables are you able to buy for the price of a pair of air pods with broken batteries?
"These tools are dangerous and table saws cause upwards of 30k injures a year."

Right. I hate the damn things and they've always scared the shit out of me whenever I use them. I've not been seriously injured yet but I've come damn close.

Fortunately, I don't have one at present as someone stole my one during a factory move. I view this as good fortune for eventually I'll have to replace it and I'll do so with one with SawStop-like safety features.

I cannot understand what all the fuss and objections are about, yes SawStop-type saws are more expensive but their cost simply pales into insignificace the moment one's fingers go walkabout.

People are mad to say one can always use table saws safely. That may be the case for 99.99% of the time but it's the unexpected rare event that bites even the most seasoned professionals.

Table saws and their related brethren table routers are by design intrinsically unsafe, and this ought to be damn obvious to both Blind Freddy and the Village Idiot.

Frankly there's something perverse about those who consider table saws safe to use, alternatively they've misguided bravado and or they lack common sense.

Redesigning them to be intrinsically save just makes common sense, and in the long run will cost society much less (as amputations are enormously expensive per capita and it all adds up).

Edit: to those down-voters, I've a longtime friend who is one of the most meticulous and careful workers that I know (much more so than I am). Moreover, that planned thinking extends to the work he turns out, it's nothing but the finest quality.

He's been around power tools all his life and I first observed him using table saws and routers over 40 years ago. That said, about four years ago he was seriously injured when using a table router. Injuries to his hand were so severe that he has lost almost all of the dexterity in his hand, even now after many operations and ongoing professional physiotherapy, he has only regained partial use of his hand.

Perhaps the skeptics need to meet people like him and just see the negative impact such injuries have had on their lives.
> Where other applications use tokio or smol, Zed uses thin wrappers around GCD and crates such as async_task

This is an amazing idea.
In the past I would have argued against you, but the WP block editor has taken away most of the advantage that Wix/SquareSpace had. I've done the same as you now. You can buy a $3/mo Hetzner ARM box and run 100 WP sites on it.
This is a reasonable point, we'll run some benchmarks and publish them.

We expect that it's faster than MySQL for small scale. Dolt is only 2x slower than MySQL and that includes disk access.

https://docs.dolthub.com/sql-reference/benchmarks/latency
It's also, you know, fiction. You can tell because of the wormholes and aliens and magic.
Running all sort of apps that wouldn't exist native on Linux (banking, whatsapp, ...) or whose equivalents although better and safer on Linux aren't compatible with what the mass uses.
I finally settled with a phone (Nokia 8110 4G) that does just the phone, the hotspot and the occasional low quality photo, then a Thinkpad for serious stuff, and don't miss at all a smartphone. But I have no use for social media etc. most people mileage will vary.
Actually I would be interested in Graphene OS, but it only supports devices that are either too old or too costly for a mere curiosity, therefore I will wait.
You are right, bad translation. She was trying to explain that the problem is that, independently of you and against your will, the remote telecommunications system is able to activate the broadband chip of your mobile phone while it is in airplane mode, where you expect the baseband system to be deactivated.
You might be underestimating how much thinking is required on the part of the applicant to fetch-a-rock at 60M requests per-second.
I've tried so hard to not make a joke about magnets fed to baby chickens, but you pushed me over the edge.
In Brazil, during the World Cup, it's very common for employers to give the day off when Brazil is playing, or at the very least let people take a break to watch the game in the office.

In 2010, I was working for a network management company, and we kept one eye on the networks, another on the game. All networks graphs saw a very large impact when the game was on, with a quick surge during half time. It was fucking unreal. I believe this wouldn't happen anymore nowadays, given the pervasiveness of streaming services etc.
What do you mean by "remote development feature"? Debugging remotely, a la gdbserver?
The problem is usually solved in tandem with myself or another full-time engineer. We offer hints and use it to watch the candidates thinking. The best candidates usually surprise us with their solution.

Do we use it as a filter? Only to the extent that it filters out candidates who don't want to put in the work, or who can't actually code.
> That's great, we're trying to filter out engineers who can't learn new things quickly, and who lie about their experience level and the sort of work they can do. People do this a lot, unfortunately.

I feel for you. It does happen a lot. A portfolio matters. References matter. But it's really nice that you give unknowns a chance too, and to do that you really do need a filter.

And it's a fairly trivial filter, since you're asking the applicant to build a proxy.

I don't think you'll get too many applicants who don't already know the stack though because... think it of from their perspective: if someone is applying who knows that stack already, then they can beat the others to the punch, so taking 2x as long to learn the stack is likely to be a waste of time. I'm not sure how to make this "fairer" so that you really do measure learning time rather than comfort level.

Your filter is likely better at finding experienced Golang devs than experienced devs who can learn Golang quickly. In the short term this is probably very good for you, but the latter are probably better in the long run because people who learn quickly and well are more valuable than people who know a tool well.
That's a great observation! I wonder if a Apple Messages style "up arrow" (arrow.up.circle.fill in SFSymbol) within the TextField would be a better UI metaphor?
100% on board. I really enjoyed using Airbnb but have boycotted them due to the damage they are wrecking on the real estate market. Now whenever I'm nomading I try to stay in coliving spaces rather than Airbnbs.
Doesn't the offender carry a heavy weight anymore?
Buyer anonymity is mission critical for us and we've taken some steps to do that like generalizing company size and industry. There's been some great feedback in this thread (thanks everybody!) about additional fuzzing we can do to protect our buyers that we'll implement.

While there may be some SaaS companies who don't like this level of transparency, we hope this actually leads to a faster sales cycle because buyers have pre-qualified themselves.
I use yadm with the default templating system which is based on awk...

https://yadm.io/docs/templates

i like yadm because it has simply no dependencies and can be installed literally anywhere on any archs (which is important to me)....

the yadm/awk templating system is good enough for me, it let you do some if host then output this or output that kind of things..... i never had a need for more.
I've used GPT-4 to help with selenium and it gets the answer eventually, but almost never on the first try. So automating this without human intervention sounds tricky.
As a counterpoint, I really like that the whole puzzle is just a text file. It's simple, and as I mention in another comment, it reminds me of learning to program in my early days.

This may not have any other real purpose than to be a piece of art. Or perhaps it's aimed at a narrow demographic of kids who are already decent programmers. However, it's also entirely possible that others will create a whole ecosystem of "unofficial" tutorials and libraries/frameworks around it.
So, basically, your opinion is both more right and more valuable than the manufacturers own emails, R&D costs, BOM's, and retail costs produced in discovery.

Why? Because otherwise you might have to admit that you actually have zero data to back the opinion you offer in the last sentence.

As for Bosch, they have admitted they priced the Reaxx very high on purpose hoping to capture a premium user and avoid regulation. They knew they were going to get sued off the market. In fact, they were later granted patent rights for free and once that happened, suddenly, well, you know, we don't wanna. Because it was (as discovered later) literally intended to stave off regulation through game playing, not do something real.
Of course, you would know this if you would bother to read any of the actual data i pointed you at

I'm remarkably aware of what happened here - i attended the CPSC hearings and also have read all the lawsuit data.

But please, continue to just not produce any real data to back up your view because then you might actually have to change it.

I'm not going to respond further unless we are going to have a real conversation here that doesn't consist of me producing data and facts and you just saying "yeah well i like my view better".

That is what really "reeks" here.
Unless of course, someone before you has written lots of tests for all the functions separately, regardless of whether they represent functionality at the integration point and there is a culture of not wanting to delete tests, because of coverage reasons. Then what you have are suddenly broken tests, even if you change only procedures at a lower level.
Is it possible to upload an image to the OpenAI Chat Playground to try it out?
Oof. Best of luck to them. I'm curious how they differentiate themselves from the Jugaad three-wheeler manufacturers. That seems to be where a lot of the demand and growth has been from what I've seen.
DJB and Lange: Post-Quantum Cryptography: Detours, delays, and disasters (2022) [video]
Love this! As a consumer, there's nothing like open pricing.

However, as a provider I can totally see a situation where I (proverbially, I'm not in this business) sue you for disclosing what amounts to a trade secret (depending on what's in the fine print) and compel you to give up all documents so I can go after my loose-lipped client too.

I hope you've got your legal bases covered
Hi, this is my project :)

For us this package is most important as the query engine that powers Dolt:

https://github.com/dolthub/dolt

We aren't the original authors but have contributed the vast majority of its code at this point. Here's the origin story if you're interested:

https://www.dolthub.com/blog/2020-05-04-adopting-go-mysql-se...
You should take a look at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondragon_Corporation

There is a template for running a business in a new way. Mondragon has sort of reached the limit of what they can do as a single institution.

Farmers, have been running coops for a long time. They work and are very effective. Again nothing new here just not in the headlines. I will say that the irony should be lost on no one that rural farmers have a form of working corporate socialism that most urban professionals desire.
Since now you have more resources, do you plan on open sourcing your whole solution, or will Beeper still be "half" open source? As far as I'm aware you still cannot use the Beeper client with your own self-hosted Matrix instance, and there's quite a lot of Beeper-only features that never became Matrix spec proposals. Is there a plan to make these features available to the whole Matrix ecosystem? Should I be worried that open source development of the mautrix bridges will cease, to focus on a commercial product?
> Immediately, I ran into some slight problems. The original Pi's 700mhz processor and 512MB of ram couldn't run an Influxdb or Prometheus instance while monitoring the temperature.

512MB memory not enough to monitor two temperatures!

An Arduino Uno with a Wi-Fi hat could easily monitor and report to a server a dozen temperatures.

I get that the author wanted to also run a database, etc. on the Raspberry Pi. But much simpler solutions can be implemented.
Has no one noticed that there seems to be no control group in this study? Every participant wrote a statement that got torn to shreds; every participant had to write their emotions about it.

It’s not outside the realm of possibility that watching cartoons for ten minutes or just sitting in silence would produce a comparable reduction in anger. Really disappointing that a pair of career academics could get away with such an astounding oversight (and get published in Nature, no less).
My first experience with Posthog was awful.

I did some napkin math, turned on their product, and ran up a $10,000+ bill in my first half day of trying the service.

You have to talk to their sales funnel to ask for forgiveness. It was an awful experience.

Not only do they not have reasonable billing limits or triggers in place, but these are quite hidden.

We're using free tools now: Google Analytics (obviously), Microsoft Clarity (session recording), and hand-rolled feature flags.
Well, there's a list of words I will start using more often.
We've been using `gpt-4-1106-vision-preview` and simply prompting the model to return json, with excellent results: https://github.com/OpenAdaptAI/OpenAdapt/pull/610 (work in progress).
Now that you have come of age, you can proceed to ingest the damn magnet. Free yourself from the chains (sic) of the patriarchate!
I'm waiting for being able to restrict to a specific JSON Schema
Achivments for Git