skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My question is: what's a real-world example where this [...]*n syntax buys you something that can't be done simply otherwise and that is worth the complexity tradeoff of people often using it subtly wrong?
In other words, Musk is running the company for his own personal gratification.

And when this isn't financially rewarding, he blames others.
Great demo video
Which whisper model do you use?
Open Sora Plan
TSMC will build third Arizona fab after winning $6.6B in CHIPS funding
Ham Radio enthusiasts love to do stuff with $1000 radios. If this can run on any reasonable laptop it could be amazing.

They're putting neural accelerators in everything these days, I wouldn't be surprised if they got it to where it could work on a phone, in which case you could do voice over Meshtastic.
Note that the second one is actually a mix of different parts/songs.
> writing the compiler took much more time

Impressive stuff.

I've dabbled wuth making my own ISA and softcore CPU in FPGA, but getting C code to compile has been a bit of a blocker.

I know there are some compilers one could try to port but my ISA is kinda esoteric so not straight forward, and so I considered just writing from scratch like you have.
How well does it work on any song outside of its training set?
That's immature and unthoughtful behaviour, but I fail to see "hate" or continued spreading of "hate", why a Wayland compositor uses Discord as a community forum given Discord is the gutter when it comes to online converse , who knows.

Keyword in your message is "may".
Since music quality / stereo are not required, a speech codec could be used. I think this TSAC outperforms most of them on raw bit rate, but not energy efficiency and speed. E.g. SILK goes down to 6 kbps; that could be a contender.

Or maybe you do want really good quality in order to fingerprint the voices. Vocoder artifacts can give parties plausible deniability (that's not my voice).
> the soviet one is very predatory

The Soviet one that you have drawn in your head is predatory. In real life, USSR went into Afghanistan alone as far as I know. Bulgaria meanwhile could dedicate efforts towards making PCs.

In the USA-satellite open market situation, Bulgaria gets to send cheap workers to fill positions in the EU as well as offers for its brightest minds, treated as a flyover country. No PCs.

The voting situation WRT Warsaw pact and Comecon was likely the same. Bulgaria can't vote anything useful in either ones.
Well yeah, that's what a modern public transportation system looks like - I know that's unusual in the US, but if you look at other places, e.g. Europe, you will also have buses, trams/light rail (with tunnel segments and heritage services for tourists) and minibuses/neighborhood shuttles in most bigger cities. The only thing that sets SF apart is the cable cars - and having both a fully grade-separated metro (BART) and a light rail system with tunnel sections (Muni Metro) - usually in cities with a "full metro" the light rail is a tram without tunnel stations.
I believe FSD is step one in abolition of personal vehicle is urban areas.

I also believe FSD cars that actually can go on any dirt road are still at least ten years away, maybe decades.

Then we still need to have a park of shared FSD vehicles big enough to become a reliable mean of transportation. This is also going to take a couple of decades. I won’t see this for sure.
In the context of Spotify customers, they are. They could have a separate tier including podcasts.
Related: This article about a teardown of the Porsche Taycan cooling system and comparison with Tesla Model-Y and Ford Mach-E:

https://www.theautopian.com/manufacturing-experts-tear-down-...
Publicly downloadable VM images. Choose openstack for a generic qcow image to run with opensource tools. Docker not supported.

https://enterprise.github.com/releases/3.12.1/download
Interesting, that's true. Is it the only effect ? I'm not sure.

From this study, it doesn't seems that speed mater that much here since it was a short conversation with a fixed subject.

You introduce a new variable in the equation. Trust. I think that is justified and its posing a whole set of new questions. I would like to answer them but I can't.
That's not right either. The --prefix needs to be /usr/local or /usr/local/stow/package-1.0, otherwise many packages won't find their own files. The prefix path will get compiled into the binary or configuration for a lot of packages, it's not just an install time thing.

Using --prefix=/usr/local/stow/package-1.0 is problematic whenever you have a package with plugins, themes or other stuff, as those go to /usr/local/share/package/... while the app is looking in /usr/local/stow/package-1.0/share/package/

Using DESTDIR and manually removing the usr/local from the directory tree is what I would consider the correct way, even if a bit annoying.

Either way, these days I would just recommend to use Nix instead, which is a much more complete solution for what stow tries to do.
> I know there are some compilers one could try to port but my ISA is kinda esoteric so not straight forward

Same. I tried digging into exsiting compilers, but they are either unsuitable at all or too complicated (clang).
Can you see that you've completely dismissed the lived experiences of many many women, brushing them aside with whatever statistics you could find?

And what do those statistics show, only that women are vastly under-represented in work and education. There's very heavy cultural reasons for that and your comment actually feels reflective of them.
The demo short is not compelling enough as a business owner
Ah, not really
I feel like far too much attention is given to `[[]] * n`. In the grand scheme of things, no serious python programmer is using multiply on a sequence outside of the string construction convenience.

It's also remarkebly easy to diagnose once you see the unexpected behaviour, so anyone asking for help is going to be instantly told not to do it and use a comprehension instead.

I'm sure there are plenty of other pitfalls in other languages, though I concede this one is especially unintuitive to a new person.
Since these are living in brutal pressures in huge depths, you can't. It would die in surface pressure immediately, just like we die in vacuum, our whole body evolved around current conditions.

Some animals can handle massive differences in pressure since they dive very deep, but this fish clearly doesn't, hence no way its adapted to massive pressure fluctuations.
I think calling it a default argument object would be much more clear. "Value" can still refer to an abstract, immutable concept, even the python docs use it like that at some places.
Software and systems configuration management is often misunderstood and under appreciated. Simplicity, maintenance costs, and robustness must be balanced with care.
Maybe... it would get too hot?

EDIT: actually, since it's outside of the visible spectrum, typical lens design correcting longitudinal chromatic aberration and doing the spherical to rectlinear projection simply might be off, resulting in soft edged and general artifacts unwanted in a clean mask
The min-sized-rust project [1], which you may already be aware of, has a lot of optimisations to decrease the size of a Rust binay. I think with all the optimisations, at the end, it was around 8kb for the hello world.

[1]: https://github.com/johnthagen/min-sized-rust
Am I missing something in thinking that this could be alleviated like every other compression algorithm by implementing it via a hardware codec?
Amazingly readable despite the book's obvious age. Put on your physics hat for some of the good diagrams and graphs.
Hibernate to Move to the Commonhaus Foundation
How could the solution be anything else? If the problem is "we want this person to understand this document", what are you going to do besides translating the document into the person's language?
I assume they do the snapshotting from some script. (Stop writes, flush, snapshot, restart writes.) If not, then they probably have some way of detecting partial writes. It seems that they do fsync() every second.

> Another, less common scenario is silent data corruption you never notice until you need to restore.

I tried to find what kind of guarantees EBS offers, but they only talk about durability and availability ( https://aws.amazon.com/ebs/sla/ ), nothing about data corruption, individual sector failure. (So this could mean that they either won't even notice ... or you might get back a full zero page - assuming they detect some underlying error, but due to encryption at rest the internal checksum fails, assuming there is one.)

It's nice that AWS recommends you to just ignore read errors ... https://repost.aws/questions/QUGqXF7BcOQKCopHJcnnDrRA/ebs-vo... :D :D :D
Man, they really tried to use a different denominator for every one of those percentages huh. Total granted approval, total with 5 years follow up, total converted to approval (which includes some with less than 5 year follow up).

Edit: oh wow even more denominators, now including "percent of the drugs that were granted full approval but only with at least 5 years of follow up data":

Quote: "Of the 29 indications converted to regular approval, we identified peer-reviewed articles with confirmatory trial quality-of-life data in 26 (90%) and a reported overall survival analysis in 25 (86%)."

Then they say "drug indication pairs" meaning there are probably a few drugs with multiple indications but then it's reported as percentage of drugs. Also, the surrogate endpoints that were dismissed as not showing clinical benefit - that may or may not hold as strongly depending on which particular indication/drug pair we're talking about and what the literature on that is. Their results might still be totally valid but might be worth like, redoing the calculations yourself in a spreadsheet or something to keep track of all the different denominators, whether some of the drug/indication pairs involve the same drug and if there was a regulatory or scientific reason for that, etc. The analysis and conclusion might be good but the summary is so confusingly written that it might just be easier to redo the calculations lol
It sounds like they're doing serverside key management (maybe not?); if that's true they do have it.
But that doesn't use the "find my device" netowrk. I think the parent wasn't saying, "I want an app that continually reports its location to my server so I can monitor my phone's location." Indeed, that's fairly trivial to build, but is useless if, say, your phone doesn't have internet access (like, someone turns it off or it runs out of battery).

The thing Google is announcing here is like the Apple "find my" network--it seems to allow you to use other people's devices to find your lost device simply based on a BLE ping.

That is something that is hard to build by yourself, and would benefit greatly from an industry-wide standard (more peer devices reporting locations!).
Awesome! Thanks for spending time on this.
Okay but is there any social situation where calling you by the middle name is the appropriate way? Except when you mom's angry like the other commenter suggested :) Is a patronymic a middle name, or a second (first, actually) last name?
I don't really get the problem here, either you're going there privately, because you're interested in the topic, and pay the lower amount. Or you go there as a business trip and pay the higher amount. Why would they allow you to go there as a business while paying the lower amount, just because your business is only yourself?
I'm the creator behind https://github.com/nlpodyssey/rwkv.f90. How about joining forces?
Elon Musk Didn't Want His Latest Deposition Released. Here It Is.
“While I’ve not found a description of exactly when and how Luciano Bello discovered the vulnerability that became CVE-2008-0166 […]”

From my IRC logs at the time:

17:23 < luciano> has really an accident. I was needing many primes numbers... 0:-)
17:23 < Sesse> and you got the same numbers every time?
17:25 < luciano> Sesse, not every time :P
Also a serf status can be boosted by receiving a visit from the lord, which has quite some costs with his court.
Got it! Thanks.

Our product is not a CTF! It inserts honeypots in our customer's infrastructure (through WAF and/or DNS configuration) to categorize attacks (manual vs. automated, targeted vs. random, persistent vs. changing) and attackers (profile creation, activity tracking despite IP rotation, skill assessment).

We then produce Threat Intel data feeds, instrument scenario seen on the honeypots and automatically replay them against our customer's assets, etc.
> It likely surpasses AlphaGo

If I remember correctly, a recent estimation is around +1000 Elo compared to AlphaGo.
Why? I mean, if there is a single, even slightly heavy db running for a desktop environment that would seem fine. Of course each service having its own is an overkill.
Ah, perfect. For some reason I didn't realise that source has the same attributes as img.

If it's not too much work, I think it would be good to add to the article for completeness :)
Are you saying f# special-cases something that looks like a closure, but isn’t in this one context? Because that, to me, seems like a much more grievous issue than the one at hand.
They should get some help from this guy who "knows more about manufacturing than any other person on the planet" ... what's his name again?
Yes, I was using Bluetooth headphones at the moment. I don't have the app name at hand, but I know that the app is also a file manager.

So there's probably jitter in my headphones, or the app was not suppose to do music playback smoothly because that's not its main usage.
If they really cared about musicians they would have just left it at fining the aggregators for allowing crap on the platform. Just a tiny amount of KYC from the aggregators would solve the problem, but instead the aggregators were just as greedy as Spotify and were happy to allow any old shit in, so they could grab another slice of the pie.
> you can be rewarded with engagement and attention and even the possibility of growing your own brand and following

Ultimately, it's a zero-sum game for all the "posters". The attention and time of your following is finite, and other posters are fighting for it, too. The "cloud algorithm" defines the rules of the game and matches your content to its consumers.
If you depend on that brand and following for your livelihood and they arbitrarily ban you, what rights do you have?
I like the approach of displaying a smaller compressed version and enclosing the img in an a tag to link to the larger image.

Let me load the page quickly if the doggo is just being used as an aside to the main content. Let me click on it to get the full raw image if I'm so enticed by that over the shoulder glance.
Serfs got protection (and other services, like justice! uh.) from the feudal lord. I don't like Varoufakis' typical oversimplification, but this one doesn't seem that bad.
How is that counter-intuitive? Or at least what’s your general intuition then? If it was [x] with x being a complex object, would you expect it to be deep copied? Shallow copied? Copied via IRepeatable? What’s your intuition on a process of repeating a value that isn’t reference-copy? What should a[3] = a[2] = a[1] = a[0] or an equivalent chunk do, assuming trivial __setitem__()? Why that should be different from a * 4?

I’m not even a python guy, if you think I’m biased. These questions are natural for a programmer and a programmer has to ask themselves about what they expect, why, is it consistent, is it safe to assume.

Making [[]]*4 to create three new lists implies that you add a non-obvious ephemeral re-evaluation point in your grammar. Should [[f()]]*4 call f() three more times?

These may be added for convenience. But you have to make sure that syntactic context makes it dead clear. E.g. in a for-i iterator part, loop conditions, function argument init, etc. Locations which are known to be executed more than once. (Python specifically doesn’t even do that for arguments. Every def f(x=[]) shares the same list as a default for x.)
In other realms, SSA and immutable data makes things faster (cache friendly) and more predictable without impure side-effects cascading in unanticipated ways. In general, references are half pointers and quarter gotos in terms of papercut yourself factor.

I think Erlang got this one right.

Perhaps folks replace their containers and fundamental types like strs, lists, and dicts with immutable ones using an appropriate library.
Like, you know, the Internet?
Is this able to replace PyTorch, ... in normal practice? No.

Does this show that in general the most used ML frameworks are a mess? Yes.
So long as the user base is growing its not zero sum.
Whatever you get out for your own self is a secondary by-product. You are bounded to that platform to get what you get and cannot leave by taking what you already contributed.

While you are benefiting from certain social returns, you are also the reason why someone else's brand is growing by the same argument. Hence the platform is doing nothing but increasing its importance for its matchmaking value. That is the premise. At some critical threshold, the platform achieves the "I'm too big to bother with individual users" and declares the feudal lordship (remember similar Stackoverflow and Reddit dramas with "We do as we please" attitude and nothing happened to the platforms because users could not give up - the following mod saga for reddit and so on and accepted their fate). It already happened with social media platforms long time ago.
Money transfer is not required from the person who is ill. I am in the UK and if I am ill I don't pay anyone to go to hospital. I have already paid through taxes and national insurance and those get deducted from my pay packet by my employer so for me and many in the Western world phone payments are not relevant for healthcare.
The obvious problem with a title like "technofeudalism" is it sounds prejudicial. Something like historical feudalism was troubling because people couldn't just walk away from it. A string of fiefdoms is actually a pretty decent organisational model as long as you don't have to inhabit ones that are hostile to your interests.

At the technical level it is trivial to set up competitors and it remains the case that nobody needs to use these sites. I don't have a Twitter account, so over the years I have been more or less locked out of using it, in fact. These sites are fine.
And serfs were allowed to work the land belonging to the lord and produce food for themselves and their families.
> Every human being, man or woman, has unique challenges.

Have you faced sex based discrimination, intimidation or othering in your workplace?

> ignores the vast and more important majority of an individual's fitness

The issue is that the capacity of women is backgrounded to the point that they have to do more to be seen as talented as their male counterparts. I'm sure every woman in tech would love to focus on skills instead of sex but that's just not the world they're presented with.

> More than just encouraging your daughter to study tech

More than this teach your sons about bias against women, how to have empathy for historically marginalised groups, how to give space for quieter voices, the broader cultural norms that lead to inequality etc

You can teach generations of daughters whatever you like but the weight of solving these issues is far from resting only on women, and the idea that it is is ironically hostile in itself.
> This sounds disanalogous to me. When you post on twitter, you can be rewarded with engagement and attention and even the possibility of growing your own brand and following.

As someone who co-runs a >>70k account: Yes, that is possible, but it's very very rare for those creating a following primarily via Twitter to actually make money with it. Maybe if you got an 0nlyfans account. Meanwhile, the content you create lures in other people and with them, eyeballs that Twitter can make money with by selling advertising time to these people.

> Meanwhile, twitter has the costs of paying for servers and infrastructure and salaries of those required to support the site

The legitimate costs required to run something like Twitter or Whatsapp can be pretty darn small. Whatsapp ran with 50 employees up until 1 billion (!) users [1]. The point is to not unfocus too much - for all the bad Musk did to Twitter, he did show that there indeed was a lot of dead weight hanging around the place, no wonder it was hemorraging money.

[1] https://blog.quastor.org/p/whatsapp-scaled-1-billion-users-5...
Sure, I'd try remove the app from the power efficiency restricted app list, which by default are enforced on all apps.
This is actually proof the free market works. It is not economical to produce chips in the US. But it is strategically important. So the government is stepping in to provide an incentive that makes it economical.

Whether you agree with the strategic importance is a different story.
UK politician admits giving MPs' personal phone numbers to someone on Grindr
> All at no monetary cost to you.

Except the fee for the blue tick. And whatever they charge you if you actually want to place ads for users instead of "pushing content" to those that follow you.

I also don't think the serf image is perfect but there clearly is an "access level" difference to where value is created and extracted.
Thank you so much for the Zero To Hero playlist!
No, it's not. If there's good quality content, scintillating discussions, amazing insights and whatnot on twiXter it will attract more users. If all of that is there but the toxic sludge level in the cesspool is already at the dear users' elbows, then it probably discourage new (and old) users from jumping in.
Twitter (and other platforms like it) self-impose those costs on themselves in order to maintain the feudalist structure. If all software were just open-source, anyone could run their own Twitter and make it interoperable. Except this already exists and is called Mastodon, or more generally, the Fediverse. The fact that billions of people still choose to use Twitter instead of the sensible alternative shows that the feudalist gambit (using algorithms to make people angry and turn on each other) is working.
> go to college now than men. Will we care about young men

This is called whataboutery. The fact that we are still de-railing conversations about women's representation to centre men's issues shows exactly why there's still so much work to be done.
Well... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTS9XaoQ6mg
OGS is great. There's an android app as well.
You would have to ask to the engineers at Lear Siegler who made that decision many decades ago.

That choice and the subsequent decision to print the arrows on the corresponding keys of a single model of their product line are why we got hjkl for cursor movement in Vi first… and now seemingly everywhere.
U.K. Lawmaker Admits Giving Out Colleagues' Numbers in 'Honey Trap' Scandal
No. F# lambdas are closures. I was just saying that I'm not using the concept of closures to explain here. It's just a side effect of using the List.init function as a demonstration.
Perhaps you are sarcastic but indeed this proves that.
Will that stop other people from tracking my devices?

Or will they still send my location and Bluetooth ID information to Google?
Sqlime: Online SQLite Playground