skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My experience is that having an actual product can also not bring anything at all.

So maybe this kind of landing page “trick” can't bring you too far. But it can definitely help to see if there's someone interested at all.

Today, the landing generator service page has gotten ten-ish emails. For a product that doesn't exist and for someone without an audience (me). Another one I have has gotten 0.

I'm also suspicious of things like this as a user, but apparently not everyone is. Specially people that are really interested.
To what end?

What do you like about HN?

What do you seek to change / improve?
I used to leave porn downloading overnight over 56k in the mid 90s.

Literal, delayed gratification.
Founding a company in Germany?! Simply living there and working on employment contract is complicated enough. Do not attempt it without lawyer parents.
I take it to mean that his viewpoint is pre-decided and unchangeable.

Weird phrasing though, I've only heard it in a positive context.
While CBC might be a better source, there's already discussion:[0] (24 points, 2 hours ago, 29 comments)

[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39962194
You think Jeff would ship a product that was paid with a stolen card....
tax cuts instead of subsidies might do better
wow! Thanks for the video... Really interesting
This was allowed in the rust-rsa crate directly before, which is why it was introduced in that commit.
Put another blurred block at the top and you have a tilt-shift effect to make your scenes look like a miniatures.
Aren't we finding out you can get ChatGPT3.5 quality models for ~1-10M dollars?

Not sure how much it costs to make chatGPT4 quality, isnt it just including human reinforcement? Maybe that will get expensive.
I feel like Clojure did live up to the hype, but is different enough that there was little chance that it would dominate in the mainstream.

The language ecosystem reflects the smaller numbers of contributors.
> I'm also suspicious of things like this as a user, but apparently not everyone is. Specially people that are really interested.

With tools like this, they will learn soon enough :-).
I think condo is meant to imply that the individual unit is owned at all, vs the whole building being owned by a corporation. Eg a landlord might say they're renting out their condo.
Drop the word “Canadian” - it applies worldwide, with very few exceptions.
Most of this money will probably end up in Microsoft's wallet anyway, buying compute from them.
There are ways to ensure the correct transfer of ownership without involving a third party. You can see these principles at work on some trading platforms already, be it for Magic cards or something else where parties cannot trust each other because they do not know each other.

Next, you would expect that the notary would educate participants and act as a source of trust, an actor in your best interest, but that is not the case. Notaries can change contracts until the last minute, and unless agreed upon, the common 14-day withdrawal period for contracts does not apply to things like buying property. Furthermore, if you are inexperienced, you can easily fall into traps.

As a concrete example, when buying a part of a shared property, it is commonly believed that the "Hausordnung" (house rules) is the owners' agreement for house rules. However, that is not the case, as there can be more, and in our case, it forbade us to keep dogs. Now, you could argue that we should have made ourselves more familiar with the law, and I would agree that is true. However, it begs the question, why do we need a notary?
There are debates and groups on other networks.

But there aren’t schisms over alt text or content warnings for food on Threads.
Common in practice is 0.5%
No minds are "put in jails".

But they do not have a right to unfettered access to me.

I'm free to choose to set standards, and the standard of requiring them to have a second account if they both want access to me and to content I find deplorable is a really low barrier.

And others are free to choose to commune with me in the spaces I want to spend time in, and communities are free to set their standards.

I've not argued for censorship. I've argued for my right to shield myself very mildly from people I want nothing to do with, and for others to choose to do so with me.

You're free to say what you want on your instance or those of people who believe as you do or are fine with your speech.

Nobody is stopping your speech, just your ability to impose it on those of us who does not want it near us.
Except the post directly criticizes one of the major new ways of reducing that effort.

Someone genuinely worried about obesity wasting doctors' time should be all for stuff like Ozempic.
I don't see why we have to stack people on top of eachother in overpriced cities in order for the economy to grow.
With the One they also made the mistake of trying to permanently tie discs to consoles in an attempt to destroy the used game market for the console, which got leaked pretty early on and led to Microsoft and the Xbox brand taking a massive reputation hit, even though they quickly backtracked. For that generation, a lot of people who would’ve otherwise bought Xboxes instead bought PS4s out of principle.
It was cash sent by snail mail. Quite a famous story https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/5hd561/jeff_bezoss_...
Attention is basically routing, these other routing schemes put a less fine-grained choice for the model, which potentially makes it easier to train
I think the language has indeed reached a stable point and found its niche, which is small, but there are certainly domains where Clojure is the best fit.

The ideas behind Clojure (functional, immutable datastructures, homoiconic syntax, focus on simplicity, JVM interop) still stand strong IMO.

There are still some exciting projects done in Clojure: Electric Clojure and Rama come to mind.
These all feel quite over-engineered. I feel like a combination of a webpage with your bio and a feed of posts with an associated RSS feed could cover the "follow a user/microblogging" side of social media, and email could cover direct messaging and threaded conversations. What am I missing that these protocols bring to the table?
There is a link on makertube, for those who are trying to avoid youtube: https://makertube.net/w/97Arnj9UNYX5gcAnoCBPB1
My home has pretty much 80% of its value as land. And it's not in a anormally expensive location in my city.
Out of curiosity when you say "we", what vantage point are you referring to?
bandpass filtering in the time domain seems like it may be more efficient for this use case to me. if i'm reading the code correctly, it seems it's computing a 512 point window and fft on every non-overlapping window.

i guess it depends on what vector/matrix instructions are being used in the underlying implementations.
Companies have other issues like VAT/GST and reporting. I had a friend use a company in New Zealand and it cost him multiple % of property price due to an issue he didn't forsee.

New Zealand doesn't have notiaries or special insurance but you do need to use a lawyer to transfer ownership and I think it costs about NZD1500 each for vendor and buyer.
Why would that be risky?
>The question then is really: "how can I algorithmically rank content on a decentralized network"

An interesting thing would be if you could write your own ranking algorithm and then apply it to your followers' content or if you could at least tweak the algorithm e.g. "I want 70% of content to be from let's say cybersecurity and 30% from gaming) or (I want 70% of content to be from my friends and family and 30% of content from "Internet people" that I follow).

Edit: Custom ranking algorithm would be hard to design and implement but not unfeasible.
How is attention basically routing?
Isn’t WiX 4 now cross-platform, the SDK at least?
> It would even fairer to say that that region had advanced civilization, huge riches, stable organization, culture (music, poetry, literature), science (math, chemistry, engineering), and so on

Religion hampered all this progress still. Those things would have happened far quicker without religion dragging humanity down.
Sure, generally speaking, people who try to break into computer systems for profit do not have a lot of overlap with people who spends lots of time writing open source software for fun.

But in this case it is not hard to imagine that the XZ-perpetrator came from the second group, right?

Edit: I mean, this wouldn't be that different from when Ken Thompson demonstrated how to do a hidden backdoor in the C compiler?
_Was_ in Europe.
A few places have worked to reduce tourism, or at least I've seen a few stories about it.

Part of it, I imagine, is the attack on social trust. More often than before, it seems that instead of seeing other people as an opportunity and as a pleasure (and we are social beings, going all the way back to our primate ancestors), they are seen as threats. And as people seem to have forgotten human rights, that we are all equal, they seem to indulge in outlawing those they don't like (what could go wrong?) - unhoused people, addicted people, people who look different, people who believe differently, etc.

I'm interested in the economics of it: Other people are not only a social opportunity but indeed an economic one. In one major European city, it was claimed that overnight bar-hoppers didn't provide much economic benefit, but I wonder how true that was, including for hotel/motel and bar owners.
Yes. The corporate veil isn't a literal one - you own the company in your real name, registered to your real address, but the company is the entity that is at risk from legal action unless you've explicitly offered a personal guarantee.
> House rules and filtering should be opt-in and not the default for the public commons.

I can't understand how you can think that fediverse instances are "public commons".
Each of them is run under the rules of the people that keep them running and not everyone can be moot to be able to suffer everything on their servers.

The public commons part of the fediverse is formed of the many software that you can just pick up and run yourself.
Location: Barcelona

Remote: Yes (or hybrid)

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: Backend and Frontend TypeScript/React/NodeJS/Postgres +more

Résumé/CV: www.linkedin.com/in/anriasaturov

Email: anri82+ycjobs@gmail.com
Still need voice directing, and the voice director will have to act out the inflections, line delivery, etc before the voice gets switched out for another one.

Can't go from text to the desired inflection yet.
Could have been worse, could have had a second wife and gone William Tell.

The story about Hollywood was fun.
Thanks for sharing your thought process on calling it brutalist.
The perspective is different for a software engineer compared to an artist or an actor. Jon Stewart is not talking about the IT industry
Only if you trust Google's hardware. I wouldn't.
If we follow your logic, only the rich will be able to create LLCs then..
I doubt very much it's going anyway. But the pool will be smaller. Same with actors replaced with AI. Same as MoCaP, sure an AI can do these things but a human is still better at being a human and human nuance - and much easier to direct.

I have a hunch the arts don't need to worry as much as they do now.

Celebrity is, has always been and will continue to be a draw.
Congrats? I can’t remember the last time I slept 10+ hours. Probably once in the last few years when I was exceptionally sick.

My range would be more like 3-7.5 hours, with (thankfully) few nights in the 3-hour range. 4.5 is not uncommon, as I am a light sleeper and once I wake up due to temperature, noise, or whatever, I rarely manage to get back to sleep. Fork in the disposal.
Correct, but you still have to know the values for the Hamming operation; my point stands.
My point is kind of exactly that, it's agreeable and it's better than nothing so people don't feel like it's worth complaining about. What about the streets between transit hubs and off of main thoroughfares? They get at most fourplexes, pretty inoffensive. So yes, build and auto upzone the transit stations for people who'd otherwise live somewhere else and arbitrarily live where they'll commute elsewhere and come home, but that just extends downtown for the rich people who'd otherwise be there in this awful compromise.

I live about 15 mins walk from the train, and don't own a vehicle, but everyone who doesn't own a $2m house lives in the basements of those houses, or in the apartments that tend to just be on the main thoroughfares subject to apparently unavoidable car noise anyway. If you didn't commute downtown, would you feel like only being able to live next to a bus exchange would be suitable?
And imagine if F# had an alternative native "runtime" (i.e. not married CLR and dotnet) grafted onto Fortran. Resistance is futile, indeed.
This is a great study on people actually dying because of these problems, temporally located many decades after the most egregious problems had been prevented:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2965780/

There are similar studies for traffic and pedestrian issues due to poor zoning.

The idea that somehow one builder in competition with other builders with no enforcement is going to make appropriate safety tradeoffs everywhere they need to is untenable.
> the insurer won't rate your premium at the cost of risk X; it will simply exclude risk X from your policy and rate your premium

Which makes it odd that there are people who can't get insurance at all because of one factor like a tree or a roof. Instead of these companies (rightly or not) excluding those risks they're just dropping the customers or refusing to insure them.

> Problem is, you cannot 100% predict the future, and there is no model capable of doing so, nor will there likely ever be.

As insurance companies get more data about you from constant surveillance and data brokers it's possible for them to assume things with far more certainty. Worse, they don't seem to care too much about accuracy either. Your health insurance could cost you more next year because data shows more people in your zip code are spending more time in fast food drive thru lanes. People have had their DNA leaked! Predicting the future (accurately or not) is getting easier every day.

> This already happens, incidentally; travel insurance policies will exclude pre-existing conditions or recurrences of previous illnesses as a matter of course

I think that's reasonable for things that nearly certain to happen. It's easy to exclude cancer in a travel insurance policy and still provide some value. It's a lot less likely when it comes to something like flood insurance where your house either floods or it doesn't, although there are certainly houses in places that flood so regularly that they shouldn't be insurable at all and no one should live there. There's a balance that's difficult to strike because the incentive is for insurers to drop anyone who has any real risk.
What happened to Element AI? That was $100M up in smoke..

Also, the government is pushing some kinda harsh AI regulations at the same time. It's kinda counter intuitive.
This is only enough to make 40 crud apps based on the ArriveCan expenditure :(
I mean, a _huge_ part of car marketing is around image. It would be surprising if the close association of a brand with a loud weirdo arsehole did _not_ have an impact. Some fraction of buyers would be embarrassed at the association.
I think the reason this hasn't been done is you have no way to decide how many recursions are necessary at train time.

And if you pick a random number/try many different levels of recursion, you 'blur' the output. Ie. the output of a layer doesn't know if it should be outputting info important for the final result, or the output that is the best possible input to another round of recursion.
Yeah, the performance takes a hit and I can see it being unusable on a lot of devices. As I say in the post, “(the blur) just plainly shouldn’t be used anywhere on the web”, at least not in this form.
Well yes in Germany.

In the Czech Republic, an average monthly salary buys you about half a square metre. Supposing you don't spend on anything else. And most people earn less than the average...
OK, the confusing thing is that Dedekind proved that a two second order models of arithmetic are equivalent/unique but Godel essentially proved that there are an infinity of first order models of arithmetic. But it seems logical that a second order model of arithmetic would contain a first model and that you couldn't say "which" model contained.

I probably phrased that wrong but I think the question is clear
Is it a feature to you that whole sections of society are absent from it? Because otherwise those views would be there.
you dont need a FFT you can use a Goertzel band pass filter
I am still developing the QR code generator project that I initiated during the COVID-19 pandemic. It all started with a basic concept: generating QR codes linked to a registration form for collecting user data. Since then, I have expanded the system significantly. You can now explore the latest version at https://openqr.io.
And yet that money seems to disappear to somewhere. Definitely not in any politician's pocket's since they've been giving themselves raises, every year, for the last few years.
I'd argue that also has a lot to do with what's available. If you go to a restaurant and they don't offer a salad, you can't get a salad unless you go to a different restaurant/region. And also the quality of it. If the burgers at the restaurant are better than the salads, why would you pick a salad. Unfortunately, city living comes with a lot of downsides (as well as upsides) but those downsides are less well managed in the US, making it culturally a different decision to live in a city vs a SFH.

Americans have been sold a story that a SFH with a yard is what it means to be successful so that's what they want. Lawns are a luxury good like BMWs, and who am I to say people shouldn't be allowed to buy what they want with their money.

The various rules and regulations and culture also come into play here as well. City living in the EU is better living than city living in the US, making that even more desirable.
Unless they get 'supply managed', to protect the fabric of Canada.
Generative artificial intelligence is simply a waste of our time and money
They did try. There's the Societas Europaea, a standardized type of corporation largely governed by EU law. It's primarily used by large multinational companies (Think BASF, SAP, Airbus): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Societas_Europaea

That was part of a push to introduce standardized EU-wide legal forms for other types of businesses as well, but the process stalled and never really went anywhere after that.
Nothing to do with AI or this announcement. But yes, public spending in technology is most often very inefficient.
Personal speculation: without John von Neumann's contributions to the Plutonium bomb, there's a good chance we would not have hydrogen bombs to this day. Here's why: the US had already had a feasible bomb design, the Uranium-235 based bomb, that was dropped at Hiroshima. Not only that, but it had an alternative to the Plutonium bomb too, the U-233 bomb. Glenn Seaborg, the guy who discovered Plutonium and a bunch of other elements, was tasked with doing a feasibility study of a bomb with U-233. He found out it can be done, and sure enough, a few years after the war the US build such a bomb and tested it. It was not done because the Plutonium bomb became possible (with von Neumann's help). But again, if von Neumann had decided to spend his time on other problems, then the US could have focused on the U-233 bomb instead.

This leaves us at the end of the war, when the Soviets decided to steal the secret and build their own bomb. Stalin decided they'll build an exact replica of the Nagasaki bomb, which they did and tested in 1949. If only U-233 and U-235 were on the table, they would have picked one of those, rather than explored an uncertain design.

From uranium bombs to boosted uranium bombs there's a small step. So the world would have seen much bigger bombs than the ones dropped on Japan. Fission bombs were built and tested that got close to one megaton.

But the hydrogen bomb is fundamentally an implosion bomb. The hydrogen bomb was a side-effect of the deeper understanding of the implosion design. In particular, the US figured out that if you can do implosion with conventional explosives, you can do it even better with nuclear explosives, so it designed and tested a two stage fission bomb, the Castle Nectar bomb. It's the only non-thermonuclear bomb ever detonated that had a yield above 1 MT (it was 1.8 MT).

The research into this two-stage bomb is what Ulam was doing, and he told Teller that maybe what works for a second stage that is a fission bomb could work for a second stage that's a fusion bomb. Teller added his own insights, and eventually it was done.
Bought by ServiceNow.
https://www.servicenow.com/company/media/press-room/servicen...
Any recommendations for larger older televisions without "smart" features?
https://archive.is/7thjn
It's just a metter of time..
I'm going to have to disagree here. Deliberate falsehoods are often silenced or censored, particularly if the accusations are very damaging. The USA has slander and libel laws, the UK has similar. I'm positive Brazil has them.

Courts and due process exist to do this silencing.
> Remember how a decade and a half ago everyone was convinced that taxi drivers and truck drivers would be replaced by AI in the coming years?

I remember that as an AI-car company driven hype cycle that was used to justify beta testing their cars on public roads. According to them, traffic Jams were supposed to be a solved problem and everyone would be making 20k/yr leasing out their car as a robotaxi.

With that said, the impact of AI is not equal across different industries.
I specifically said I don't know; that's one reason I would be very careful. Notice that your response is to assume complete and correct knowledge of your own.

I do know that being LGBTQ+ is persecuted in many places, even in the US; I know what is overlooked now can be persecuted later, even many years later; I know that in most places Internet usage is recorded and is used to build detailed profiles of users, and that those records are retained indefinitely.
I wish seqouia would use MPL-2 or something over LGPL. It's only a little weaker in licensing terms but vastly more convenient to use.
Losing my legs changed my life for the better
Clojure focuses on quality over hype, at great success. Its hypesters never really understood Clojure, and have long moved on. So will the hypesters of Rust and other hyped languages, unless they get a chance to ruin them.
Ummm... where do you think industrially relevant research comes from?
And? The IETF RFC draft for ADoT still specifies that it relies on DNSSEC.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dickson-dprive-adot-a...
California malls as we know them are dying. Here's what comes next
That’s not quite true. Yes people cared less about his art while he was alive, but that was because of his erratic behavior. There was no doubt that the people surrounding him found his art beautiful, especially In his later years when he was staying at the clinics
Thank you for the idea!
> “We cannot live in a society in which billionaires domiciled abroad have control of social networks and put themselves in a position to violate the rule of law, failing to comply with court orders and threatening our authorities.”

There is nothing true in this sentence. Just an a priori assumption that the judge's power must be above everyone's speech , with a sprinkling of billionaire-hate
It's important to always see the bright side
Not anymore. Online banks like Mercury will do it entirely remotely without any residency requirements, IIRC.
I used to live in the Netherlands and paid quite a lot of taxes. I met a surprising number of Dutch who didn't work and lived off the welfare state.