skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Think of it like pushing against someone facing you, in a physical confrontation. The line of play in football, a fencing match.

When you press forward, your opponent gets pushed back.
FYI Vivaldi is run by ex-CEO and co-founder of Opera. =)
> NGO's come and claim resources on the land to mine what is rightfully Brazil's.

It's grimly amusing how the grabbier half of society literally cannot comprehend that not everyone is as selfishly motivated.
They also eliminated the entire point of liability.
Years ago, someone noticed that hepatocytes injected into a mouse's abdomen would migrate into the lymph nodes and start making liver cells. I don't even know why they were doing that in the first place, but all this research follows from that observation.
In my experience, AMD still has some massive stability issues with the VBIOS of their GPUs. But it's not a component that the users can officially update on their own (whichever version the graphic card comes with when you receive it, is what you are stuck with), and most users are not even aware of its existence (even on Windows, the official driver doesn't provide any way to update it, or even check its version). Resulting in two seemingly similar cards, with the same drivers and firmware, behaving wildly differently in some case depending on the production batches the card was part of. Ask me how I know.
Until you build too many shovel factories that all open right when market growth suddenly slows down.
+1, SPA should only be used as a last resort, not sure why the article compares only to it.

SvelteKit is much simpler and well-documented and addresses the issues mentioned.
This same argument will be henceforth made about anything created by AI, and regardless of how ubiquitous and capable AI becomes, it will never be invalidated.

AI generated inputs will never have the soul of human created art, by definition. The soul is the intangible and inimitable kernel of emotion buried in the art by virtue of it being created by a human. It’s what separates art from ‘output’.

Of course it’s not to say AI content cannot be enjoyed, but I think as a society we will need to be increasingly mindful of cultivating and appreciating this soul wherever we can. Endless scrolling apps have shown us we humans get easily sucked into becoming content consumers, and AI is particularly well poised to generate limitless content.

This is uncharted territory for our spongy, dopamine-seeking brains. Self-awareness of our own consumption is more important than ever.
Ubuntu devs use ubuntu beta, I would imagine?
Since I'm a bit late to the party and feeling somewhat overwhelmed by the multitude of articles floating around, I wonder: Has there been any detailed analysis of the actual injected object file? Thus far, I haven't come across any, which strikes me as rather peculiar given that it's been a few days.
What does php spring and rails have to do with this? I'm confused haha
AgileFlow – Simplify Your Git Workflow
Seems like most Git workflows are over-engineered. Here I'm exploring a workflow that gives just enough structure for the most agile teams.
> "Stable Audio 2.0 was exclusively trained on a licensed dataset from the AudioSparx music library, honoring opt-out requests and ensuring fair compensation for creators."

This is how you do it. Well done, Stability AI!
Posted a few days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39893657
Appealed and overturned: https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0ZU1RI/

> which I don't really buy because China can't arrest you over here

Not entirely true: https://www.politico.com/news/2023/04/19/china-police-state-...
What is that story supposed to mean?

I liked the cinematic synthwave track too - much better than what a lot of human creators do.

But… the fact that it can generate a pleasant electronica tune is essentially meaningless. This is no Miles Davis.

An LLM generated narrative cannot convey the emotions and experiences of the author. Nor can AI generated music.
> This is the bay area fixing its problems.

By imposing itself where it's not wanted. It's like a country solving resource shortages by invading its neighbor instead of budgeting better or making its resource usage more efficient.

IMHO, they should bulldoze Atherton and build 20-story Chinese-style apartment blocks there, first.
This was posted yesterday
It's weird that everyone from Euclid to Gauss disagrees with you.

The language is a baby compared to the applications.
Is it space feet, or space survey feet?
One factor that I'd love to have some hard data on:

- people who espouse extreme opinions online in chinese are not necessarily legible to any other south east asians.

- people who espouse extreme opinions online* in english are probably legible to younger other south east asians.

* including on the orange site
Do we have any atomic clocks on the moon at the moment?
Franz: Native Kafka Client for macOS, Windows and Linux
Em, I think you mean any reasonable minded human that walks the planet.
Not really, Vaadin is mainly a UI component lib and some convenience annotations, while LiveView is designed to allow soft-realtime UI views over WebSocket.
A sense of intentionality vs spontaneous cut-up forms

Eventually people will say they can see thoughtful attention in AI art. Not today
This is really neat. I didn't see mention of copyright on the output audio. They talk a good bit about how they handle the input audio's copyright (which is great they mention that), but I didn't see anything about the output. Do you own it? Do they own it? I may have just missed it, but that's an important piece here IMO.
Eventually, some form of this paradigm is going to win.

In practice, applications need state on both the client and the server. The server needs the authoritative state information (since the client is untrusted), but the client needs to be able to re-render in response to user interaction without a round-trip.
It’s actually amazing that reducing the number of car trips would make driving more enjoyable.

I’m not telling people who love cars to stop driving. I own a car myself! I just want to live in a world where I’m not forced to use it for every single daily task.

So, yeah, it would be amazing if you didn’t have to take your car to work or school or the grocery store. Maybe you would still choose to! But the beauty of it is that a good slice of people would say, “geez, why am I paying this car payment and insurance and gas when I only use the car twice a week, maybe our family can go down to one car or keep our cars for longer.”
I recently saw an article arguing that waiting for overall LLM improvements actually beats fine-tuning in most cases as well. What are your feeling on this? (apologies that I can’t remember the source)
Is it any different when you receive a zip file by email? It could very well have been crafted to exploit a backdoor in your compression program.
This comment goes as far back as Euler and 1767:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39917278
The issue as I see it is that the tools available don't just determine how a given war is fought, they also determine whether it is fought at all.

If Israel wasn't able to use tools like this, then it probably wouldn't be viable for them to identify much of Hamas (that's kind of the point of guerilla warfare). Since that would make it difficult to fight a war efficiently, they would be more likely to engage in diplomacy.
Well said! You are absolutely right and "vouaobrasil" is wrong.

As a person interested in self-learning Mathematics, i have read and amassed a lot of "popular mathematics" books by authors like Ian Stewart, W.W.Sawyer, E.T.Bell, George Gamow etc. all of which were great motivators but none of which taught me the basics of "Modern Mathematics" which i could only get from Textbooks. The quality of Textbooks are of course all over the map and so i am always on the lookout for the simplest, clearest and yet rigourous explanations available. The book under discussion seems to check all such boxes for a beginning student.
Sure, but currently, if you want to talk about people being held against their will, only the government can do that.

And no, working at a job you don't like just for the heath insurance coverage does not count as being "held against your will." Check your privilege.
>building in a lot of slack into their industrial capacity

This is exactly what I was cautioning against. Slack in a system is not economically productive. It is risk mitigation. You're conflating economically productive value with risk-reduction value. For the same reason, insurance is considered a liability, not an asset. That doesn't mean adding extra capacity isn't warranted from a risk perspective, but it doesn't mean you can add that excess capacity to the plus side of your ledger. It really seems like we're talking past each other because you aren't able to parse the different types of value I'm talking about.

>It correlates with leverage

I've already conceded this point. I used economic leverage because it is the most generalizable method to get leverage. Sure, you could instead blackmail the boss or date the boss's daughter to get leverage. But I don't think those hold as a general rule for a good strategy so we're mainly left with providing differential economic value. It's like quibbling that offense/defense doesn't matter in football, only points matter. In the same way, harping on leverage is both true and not particularly distinguishing in its helpfulness. Or to tie this into the OP, adding value to society does not give you much leverage in a capitalist system. Adding economic value does. And I think people focus on the wrong value system and get frustrated when the expected results don't follow.
No, no, you forget about the gravity well. Read up on your Heinlein!
I disagree with you. There is no justification for death.

1) Where do you draw the line?
2) At what number does that one become two?
3) how long do you think until AI is justified to start killing those single digit persons?

4) What if that one person is you? (this is not that hard to imagine, suppose a fictitious near future where everyone that contributed to some extinction event is deemed killable: AI development, global warming, failed to do some recycling, etc).
Have you tried it? It's horribly slow.
"Before" means "in front". It's clearer in German, where "vor" is the exact same word.

See also use of "before" to mean "in front of" physically.

edit: also works if you consider being onboard a ship. The forward parts of the ship pass a given point "before" the "after" parts of the ship.
The Moon will win because it has the high ground.
Nice! Thank you for sharing this.
I love LiveView + Svelte!

(I gave the talk at ElixirConf 2022 on how to combine them, but the live_svelte contributors have done the work to make it a reality)

IMO there is always a need for client side state, especially for apps with rich UX. I also live in NYC where network connectivity is not a given, especially in transit.

One super powerful feature that the authors don't cover is being able to use Phoenix's pubsub, so that server-side state changes that occur on other servers also get pushed reactively to any client. It's pretty typical to have multiple web servers for handling mid/high levels of traffic.
> Surely this does not mean he proved that metals scream when twisted ?

Well, the tin responded to a stimuli ... now how do we interpret that is the question?
Yes, it was. And by that, for instance also all docker images that derive from debian:testing, which is not that uncommon.
Is there a reason for the stray strong "i" in the middle of the text?

Your LaTeX didn't render for $R^{2}=0.78$

You're missing an "is" in this sentence:

> So, if you want to want to win the HN game, consistency in sharing IS the winning strategy.

I can't parse this sentence:

> "Because I was still collecting the data, and the I had only until 2015 then"

All in all, an interesting analysis, although I'm unsure of some of the conclusions. Many of them seem reasonable, but it would be nice for someone to use them to form hypotheses and go on to test them.

But definitely an interesting article.
It’s also worth pointing out that a lot of current “art” is produced under similar constraints to AI art - for commercial purposes and with algorithmic feedback. It’s easy for people to think ‘this is just as good as a human’, when they are only comparing it to soulless corporate art in the first place.
Those before times are still today, depending on what you're doing. For hard real-time, dynamic memory is (almost) never used, mostly because the time needed to alloc/free memory isn't deterministic. So everything is statically allocated at compile time and yeah, you've got to know how much memory your inputs are going to consume.

But knowing the bounds of memory consumption used to be normal for application programmers, too. I mean, you don't want to run out of memory. Ever. What do people do now, just YOLO memory usage?
I think setting up a server isn't the real problem. The bigger problem is the idea of using discord for an open source community when there are solutions like IRC or Matrix which are actually open source. Not to mention that discord is going to start showing ads.

Another issue is that the article mentions using forums, which is a bad idea. Using forums the information is limited only to members of the discord server. Good luck finding something on google if it isn't even indexed.

Also here are some previous discussions on the same subject

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28549739

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29154216

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29712098

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30311982
Did everyone understand that beyond stopping processing new data, they were going to delete all the old data? For a service running for well over a decade that's a bit alarming.
Finding highlights in long-form video automatically with custom search terms
I will never buy a Tesla simply because they come with "features" that I find completely unacceptable. Musk doesn't enter into it.

That said, I consider Musk to be so awful in so many ways that I do my best to avoid doing anything that will put money in his pocket. So even if Tesla produced a product I would enjoy, I wouldn't buy one.
Do you have any sources I can use to dispel this myth the next time I see it?
Why does everything have to have an incentive outside of "because I wanted to"?
Do you know much about how this all works? I've been thinking about how a human child ingests (maybe) petabytes of tokens every day through video and action. They initiate movement and observe the consequences through video, audio, proprioception, etc. The decades of schooling afterwards seems like fine tuning on a base model.
We will basically see who wins the race and gets adopted the most.
AFAIK one can also consider the 4D velocity vector to have a constant lenght. Thus the faster you move in the spatial dimensions, the slower you move in the time dimension to maintain the constant length.
Mate, you are being delusional about war.

"A group of people who informed and coordinated with the IDF?" dude...
`public bool isSomehowAssociatedWithHamas() { return true; }`

AI

Yeah, yeah guidelines and all.
Adding a new label for closing github/gitlab issues right now: "JIATAN"

Also works like Karen. "this project ...." "ok Jia"
It seems like the largest cause of deforestation of the rainforest is farming(1). Prevention of illegal destruction is probably a good idea, but if this is to replace it by its legal counterpart...

1: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deforestation_of_the_Amazon_...
Why not do both? I mean I like reading books on AI and papers but without a degree, you have no proof to the layperson that you’re more competent than any grifter claiming they’re an AI expert. Until you can have a conversation that is. A masters makes it easier to have the opportunity of getting a conversation where you can prove yourself. It’s a privilege gate-keeping tool but it is what it is. Alternatively, build something impressive and maybe that can do the talking.
You are confusing the Internet with the web. You do not "browse" the Internet. Browser suites are for using the Internet, and the Netscape Suite provided numerous tools to use various protocols on the Internet. One of those happened to be a browser for browsing the web.

I say this to make it clear that the "now" in your comment ignores past and present browsers across all platforms.
There's a typo in the headline here on HN: the initialism for Coordinated Lunar Time is LCT, not CLT.

(this isn't my opinion on whether we'll end up following suit with UTC and so on, the article itself calls it "LCT", and "CLT" does not appear on the page at all)
I actually thought of a good example of this exact thing happening, with the exact same good (land).

Disney and Florida.

Disney bought much of the land in secret, but when it got out land shot up in price. Nobody got sued over it.

> Walt knew that an announcement that his company would be building a resort in Central Florida would have caused land-costs to skyrocket as speculators and smaller developers would have swooped in to make a killing. To make sure that this didn’t happen, Walt set up several fictitious companies to buy up land. One of these was cheekily named the “M.T. Lott Real Estate Corporation” and the “Latin-American Development and Management Corporation” as the supposed buyers.

> Overall, the company bought 27,400 acres of land from 51 landowners for over $5 million. The land cost $182 per acre after the deal was done.

> Of course, once it was revealed that Disney was behind the purchases, the prices of land jumped more than 1000%. That’s partially why Walt bought his first acre of land in Florida for Walt Disney World for $80.00 and his last for $80,000.00!

For full context, Flannery is mad that they want more than $15,000/acre.

> Yet even when Flannery increased its offers to over $15,000/acre, which would have
given these Conspirators a profit of up to approximately 32,000% (32 times) on their investment in only a few years, they countered Flannery's offers by demanding even higher payments.
I also don't know how common it is but spent the holidays with some friends including an Amazon warehouse worker. They claimed to really like their job and felt they were treated well. Didn't want a desk job so wasn't even interested in being a supervisor. This was in the UK for what it's worth so they have health insurance that's not tied to their job.
This is actually the guy that finally helped me break through into understanding (at least a little what's going on). Specifically about how the movement through space lengthens distances between objects (including atoms) and causes information (including light) to travel further, along the hypotenuse of a triangle, "in order to do stuff".

"Doing stuff" includes observing things because of the light travel distance, but also biological processes, which involve eg. electrons moving from one atom to another.

I didn't watched the linked video here (more relevant perhaps), but this was the one for me: https://youtu.be/Vitf8YaVXhc
I completely reject this idea that residents of an area should have any power to exclude others. These farmers dont live in a separate country. Im also in favor of apartment blocks in atherton for what its worth. We should do both.
You are all over the thread suggesting this is impossible and a lunacy to even suggest players keep access to their games.

Are you a manager at Ubisoft by any chance? Otherwise I do not get why you are so adamant in defending the practice on behalf of these large studios.

At least the other commenter strongly against this initiative says they have worked for AAA studios before in their HN bio, so their bias is clear.
Does anyone know if they could use the patient’s own liver cells instead of a donor’s? Is every cell in the dying liver so unhealthy that they couldn’t harvest any?
it's anything but trivial (otherwise we wouldn't ask); the case for not following certain feature requests goes roughly like this: are those potential users asking for a new feature _same people_ as your ICP or _different people_?

If the former, as in one can imagine an actual person using both features A and B, then obviously, you should ship what users are asking for. But if they are different people - meaning that no one person would use both A and B - then instead of making product better for your customer base, you'd be making the product available to more people. Which conventional startup wisdom advises against (YC, lenny, etc because one can ask - why are the remaining people who need A not using your product yet? It's either product not good enough (then you should improve the product for group A first), or the group A too small (then why do A at all and not focus on B?)

Now, with multiple CI backends is not clear-cut at all. We keep debating this internally but seeing both sides of it. On the one hand, it's highly unlikely that an organisation is using multiple CI tools simultaneously. But then how do we know that GitHub Actions is the one? We are self-hostable commercial oss and one of the selling points over Terraform Cloud is security. This seems to be naturally aligned with Gitlab as customers who'd use a self-hosted VCS are probably our perfect targets. And then the case against Bitbucket is that it's kind of fading away, there are still people using it but their share is definitely not growing, somewhat similar to say Travis or Circle.

So yeah, a lot of unknowns
This is the frontier—tiny, specialized models like this and ReALM [0], coupled to the application logic and able to run on-device.

Eventually devices will be powerful enough to run more general purpose models locally, but for high-frequency user tasks with a low tolerance for error, smaller specialized models may always win.

[0]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.20329
This isn't necessarily just about the models themselves, as there also laws — and protestors dropping banners on Altman's head[0] — basically saying "can you not".

[0] https://youtu.be/NjpNG0CJRMM?si=4iLD06yCbbSSfzm9&t=1013
> ...while this is an important tool for giving audiences the information they need to distinguish been trustworthy and untrustworthy information, it cannot be used as a fact checking mechanism to establish whether an image itself is real or fake...

more thoughts: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39819918
THANK YOU, for making images based on scratch, rather than Debian or Alpine. It makes redistribution so much easier from a license compliance perspective.

And double thanks for providing an SPDX document for the contents of the image.
Your understanding is correct, more or less[0], but there are two parts to strategy: an inexpert counter is likely to be distracted, and to make errors from perfect play. They’re also likely to lose the count, and make errors in bet sizing. The net of those is worse than a non-counter playing perfectly, whose edge is slightly negative but who still stands a decent chance of making money on a given day.

But note that’s a reason for casinos not to overtly discourage counting; they’ll still happily ban a player who is apparently counting well rather than roll the dice on whether they’re counting “well enough”.

[0] Sibling points out that counters will make specific deviations from “naive” perfect play depending on the count, but that’s to push earnings up a bit on an already positive edge. There’s also the element of camouflage, where a really strong counter might deviate in ways that don’t hurt their earnings but make their play look less “counter-y”.
Good to know! Their magazine archive is amazing, so I kay try to maintain a seed for some of those categories.
Mozilla (the browser) was like that wasn't it? Email, browser etc. and FF was the stripped down version.
TLDR: author bought a phone of eBay that was sold as unlocked, but wasn’t, and doesn’t want to use AT&T.