skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Have any evidence for that or are you just trying to console yourself? Because hundreds of thousands of developers have been laid off in a strong economy. Your arguing that happening at the same time as the general availability of AI is just a coincidence seems a bit disingenuous. Today's AI is a force multiplier, one of the largest productivity boosts in history. Of course companies are going to cash-out on that opportunity - and they are.
Show are you with "opium of the masses" in that case?
> You would need to rollback safety standards to achieve this.

Or add new safety standards targeting people outside the car too (e.g. pedestrians and cyclists, or people in smaller cars) which can and do get crushed by modern monstrosities.
Its the perfect back door to get more data. "It could be useful someday! just keep giving us all the training data until it does something useful"
It captures the cypto suckers, it traps smart software people with "unlimited potential!", it traps every single company management because they can fire everyone, it traps government in endless new reasons to authoritarian-smackdown.

There is no stopping it, there is only people who stop trusting most technology
reconstructing a 3D scene out of a video clip, not affected by moving objects
You sound like someone who would throw their child's painting away instead of putting it on the fridge because it was just a piece of paper with a few brushes of paint slapped onto it.
>I'll get on my soap box then. The redis client ecosystem is fractured and awful, and it's mostly Cluster's fault. Getting cluster right is really hard, and most clients do it inconsistently and get something wrong, if they tried at all (hiredict doesn't for example).

Fair point, I think it's prudent to recognize this as a weakness in the ecosystem. But I would also say that applies generally of cluster, sentinel, etc, in all respects. I know this is a focus area for valkey for that reason.
Years ago, I was convinced that saffron's "taste" was more mental than anything else, so I ran a little matched pairs experiment to see if anyone could taste the difference between a rice dish with saffron or one without. No one could.

Admittedly, it was too small of an experiment to be sure, but it just seems like a very expensive food dye to me.

I'll just stick to turmeric.
Something like that. Mozilla used the Netscape code to first create Mozilla Application Suite and then SeaMonkey[1]. It had Mail, IRC chat and a composer.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SeaMonkey
In the past, those musicians got CD sales at local gigs. Does anyone buy CDs any more?

Before then it was cassettes. Same format though: you’d see them at a pub and buy a CD / tape if you liked their stuff.

The long tail of musicians have always been worse off though. Organisations like PRS would distribute subscriptions to the household names leaving smaller bands with next to nothing and the long tail with literally nothing.

The meme of a guitarist sleeping on their friends couch is as old as the internet is.

Fact is, most artists don’t make money. Just like most footballers don’t. And most sports car racers don’t. There isn’t ever going to be a way to pay every budding musician, painter, nor sports enthusiast for their time. However if one of these personalities do succeed enough to go professional, ie that being their primary income, they should at least be paid fairly.
The same math could probably be done for sustainable stewardship of our oceans, just with more steps.
Hence the "pretty much".
Copy-Paste?

Ctrl-A (select all)

Ctrl-C (copy)

Ctrl-V (paste)
A lock is not to keep out bad guys who want to get in, but to keep good guys honest. Same with privacy.

Why not install a camera on your toilet while we’re at it?

Or do you have something to hide?
Why? I feel he will able to write more.
Zsh IDE Plugin for JetBrains
> light moves at a constant speed

While in the same medium, right?

The speed of light is a universal constant in a vacuum, like the vacuum of space. However, light can* slow down slightly when it passes through an absorbing medium, like water (225,000 kilometers per second = 140,000 miles per second) or glass (200,000 kilometers per second = 124,000 miles per second).*

https://www.space.com/15830-light-speed.html#section-speed-o...
It's interesting because I love using Haskell in a stable production environment. In fact I'd hate to use anything else!

On the other hand, I almost never use naked recursion in Haskell. It typically do recursion indirectly through more familiar combinators such as for loops.
What's the advantage of IFUNCS, over putting a function in the library that selects the implementation, either via function pointers or a switch/if? In particular given that they seem to be quite fragile and exploitable too.

I don't have much experience in low-level optimization, but would a modern CPU not be able to predict the path taken by a brach that tests the CPU features.
It's about mindshare. Random people using your product to do AI means that the tooling is going to improve because people will try to use them. But as it stands right now if you think there's any chance you want to use AI in the next 5 years, then why would you buy anything other than Nvidia?

It doesn't even matter if that's your primary goal or not.
Comments moved to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39918245, which has the source this article points to.
To be fair, one of the big 3 in Detroit is a European company (Stellantis, the result of the merger of Fiat-Chrysler and Peugeot, Citroen, Opel) so "buy American" hardly applies to them - a Toyota manufactured in Texas is just as American as a Ram manufactured in Detroit.
Right, but the size of the buffer is given, it doesn't make sense to stomp over end of the callers buffer either, so you can't use pass in something longer than `nbytes` either.
Yes. We've merged that thread hither.
All the transformers melting seems like a tough problem. What’s the solution?
He is one of the most successful people to have ever lived. We regularly have rockets that launch into the air and then land (200+ of these successfully in a row) because of a company he started.

I know the counterargument is that he's not smart, he just hires smart people, but if you know smart people, they generally don't get recruited by idiots (even rich ones). He managed to surround himself with rocket scientists and engineers who revolutionized space travel. His company successfully navigated not only the engineering side but also the part that involves dealing with the bureaucracy of the US government. He came up with the idea to launch Starlink (and idea that others failed at before him) in order to create revenue to support rocket launches.

I just apply Occam's razor here - given all of these things that he and his companies have accomplished, is it likelier that he's smart or stupid? And if he's stupid but still managed to accomplish these things, why didn't other rich people who are smarter than him accomplish them? How come Bezos is so much worse at creating a space company than Musk? We live in a capitalist society, so if all it takes is a few hundred million dollars and no brains to start SpaceX, which is worth many, many multiples of that, why has no one else done it?
It still makes a difference. When workers are abundant, the "automation" we get is Uber / DoorDash, which is actually more labor intensive.

People then complaining about delivery fees going up when the labor tightens, that is unambiguously tied to power structures.
If you want a minivan without power sliding doors, you're going to be out of luck.

If you want a minivan where the doors can still be opened with no power, most of them can.
So alcoholics should do a periodic stress test of binge eating to get an early warning.
Pot calling the kettle black.

Outlook.com still rejects messages from an entire c block if they don't like a particular IP, even when other IPs in that range are not black listed anywhere.

To be fair, things have improved and you now get an undelivered mail notification. Used to be the message would simply disappear without a trace.
Hmm, I'm not sure about "acyclic", since maybe victims can impose some kind of retaliation on a scammer/spammer, but the path back is either a much weaker link or involves more hops that lose strength.

So maybe it's about comparing flow? Maybe the aggregate (sum? average) of flow along paths they can use to harm a victim are stronger than the reverse that a victim can use to fight back.

Is there a discrete-math term for that? Delta of inversed maximum flow something something?
It's very obvious if he's talking about something you know about; he does much the same confidently incorrect act as an LLM.
I didn't know this until I searched for myself in the linked OpenCorporates site - was surprised to see my Delaware LLC not listed.

How/why is this true? IMO it should be straightforward to find the owner/director of a US based corporate entity.
I see lots of new activity in there, including reviews and feedback etc. What makes you feel they are copied?
Saffron's expensive by weight; but not per recipe. A teaspoon of the stuff could float away on the breeze, but few recipes call for as much as a teaspoon. A £5.00 box of saffron lasts me about 3 months, and I use the stuff weekly.
Google Earth, Formerly Keyhole EarthViewer, funded in large part by the CIA.

https://www.businessinsider.com/the-cias-earthviewer-was-the...
Any plans for a JS/TS companion, like LangGraph has?
I use it all the time. I guess I'm just patient :-)
Lightning AI launches next-gen AI compiler Thunder to accelerate model training
It's wild to me how little people understand how many systems they rely on just to survive. It's only hard to for you to believe the impact because things have been running smoothly so you haven't had not notice the energy infrastructure you're depending on.

The entire electrical grid of the US is destroyed you no longer have the means to provide clean drinking water and food to the nation. You would have immediate and widespread economic collapse. Even the military would be crippled in there ability to help since, per the article, 99% of their power comes from the consumer grid.

You can lose power for a few days and be fine because you are still supported by a massive electrical infrastructure. But a destroyed grid would be catastrophic.
Good luck landing a craft built by multiple teams with possibly differing definitions of Newtons.

Kinda feels like agreement on the definition of the Newton would be the difference between "guidance and propulsion systems worked perfectly" and "debris was scattered across the landing zone".[1]

[1] Not an astrodynamicist, but have done enough problems with inclined planes, pulleys, springs etc to know it's quite important to get the magnitude of the forces right.
All the controls they have use software to do work. Its not like a car you can’t rebuild your engine or jerry rig a solution yourself in outer space. If things don’t go as planned usually people just die, heroic MacGyverism is for hollywood.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_says_no

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computers_Don%27t_Argue
In software development it is often said that there are only three relevant numbers: 0, 1 and infinity. Everything else is contrived.

Certainly, nature follows a very similar pattern. For limited values of infinity ))
Fortunately the merpeople are already extinct; no genocide necessary this time.

More seriously, I'd expect greater resource availability to result in fewer wars over it. That's pretty consistent with human history.
Yep! That's the plan. We're actively looking for partners who can test it out while we're building/bring us use-cases to noodle on, so feel free to reach out if you're interested.
Yeah - I think you don't necessarily (or only the best) go to a Netflix or MGM, but you could see success like a lot of smaller podcast content creators do.

10,000 screaming fans can take you a long long way.
Hey, OpenTofu core team-member here. I'd like to leave a note on what seems to have caused a lot of the confusion in this article.

The copyright headers in the new files are necessary because we sometimes need to move around code from older files.

For more information you can see this issue: https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/454#issuecomment...
Wow, sure wish I was in that elite class. I aint. I was a guest.

> All the decriminalize crap is pushed by rich liberal types. They live in luxury apartments or out in the burbs.

And they're doing those same drugs they want decriminalized.

> Ask any poor or working class person. They don’t want this crap. Drugs ravage their communities. They have to deal with these problems.

Again, the drugs are the escape. Escape from what? Poverty.

Poverty is the actual thing ravaging communities. And in inner cities, it is definitely a zero-sum game, or likely negative-sum.

Rich people do drugs as an experience with friends. Its a whole different mindset than "i want to do drugs to escape the fact I dont have enough food and my tooth hurts and avoiding the gunshot sounds outside".

> Same thing with the defund the police and other non sense.

Again, rich liberal types usually don't worry about petty theft or simple vandalism. They dont see it, and so they want to defund it.

Ive had a unique life, where I'm now middle class, went through living on the streets in poverty, and been the guest to some of the rich liberal class. You can try to make fun of me for my experiences. Try to understand whats going on, and why. And the rich are being honest in what they ask, but not what they say.

And in all my experiences, poverty and extreme income disparity is the actual elephant in the room. Drugs? They don't cause near the problem.
There's another dupe thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39919109
> Prompt injection is the security flaw that exists because doing that - treating instructions and data as separate things in the context in the LLM - is WAY harder than you might expect.

Then we should improve the tooling around this to make it way easier, rather than hoping security by obscurity will work this time.
Their point is that when they try and trade in their 3 year old truck which they got a low interest rate for a new one, not only is their truck worth bugger-all to trade in but their next interest rate will probably be doubled or more.

Hence they'll stick with their current one so one less sale.
I am sure they are on a three year replacement cycle like every other piece of enterprise compute. Home depot is also not the only place to do fast scanning. Grocers have always been able to scan instantly as long as I’ve been alive at least.
from the article:

> While often partly obscured by secrecy jurisdictions — such as the British Virgin Islands, Panama, Cyprus, or Cayman Islands …..

I wish people were in a place to see where the ICIJ is misguided, like they play into a sentiment that is widely shared but heavily misunderstood

For example, the Cayman Islands was assumed to be super secret and shady and then the results of their information sharing agreement came out and it turns out the Delaware was waaay more heavily used and way more secretive. Jumping the US to the least transparent jurisdiction…. Up from spot number 2.

All this offshore money hiding stigma is capturing the minds of people that are being intentionally mislead. Not by the ICIJ theyre just as misled. just the collective apparatus of a more powerful state that does protectionist things for its own industries against smaller nations states. The US has difficulty bullying its constituent member states, and directs all of that angst outwards to anyone competitive, while the US is a bigger market participant in the same behaviors the whole time!

for both foreigners looking to hide ownership and money, and citizens, the US onshore offers a catalogue thats at parity or superior to financial services microstates, and flies under all scrutiny
Yes, but specifically the Palestinian impact is why it’s such a terrible policy for Israel unless you assume their goal is perpetual war. Most people do not want to kill other people but each innocent killed like this is leaving behind friends, family, and neighbors who will want vengeance and some fraction of them will decide they need to resort to violence because the other mechanisms aren’t being used. Watching this happen has been incredibly depressing as you can pretty much mathematically predict a revenge period measured in decades.
I believe you diluted it too much
I agree we shouldn't exist as mindless agents that simply serve the collective goals of society.

However, shouldn't the aim be towards empowering an individual towards the human condition that they desire? Of course, within the constraints of the allocated resources that society can provide. That search to enable self-actualization and purpose for people can inherently come with tasks that are... well boring.

Sending an email that is critical to fostering an important business connection can sometimes be a chore. But it's important. People with ADHD especially struggle with this, as they thrive on brains that crave stimulation. Many live very unsatisfying lives (higher rates of unemployment, depression, divorce) as a result of this.

In many cases, it can feel as if you're a prisoner to your mind. You don't feel like you have the agency to live the life you want. And why? Because of some executive function deficits? Why not use technology as a way to externalize these cognitive management malfunctions?

I enjoy Gena Gorlin's idea of the Builder's Mindset that explores this viewpoint in more detail: https://builders.genagorlin.com/p/a-different-and-better-way...

I believe we should attempt to ruthlessly search for a life that aligns with our desired human condition.

I'd like to know your thoughts!
The level of "outrage" deliberately exceeds the reasonableness of their position, which strongly suggests they're being sarcastic.

- They use "unacceptable" twice in a row, which sounds exaggerated.

- Likewise with all the exclamation points.

- They say "It was irresponsible to let ships pass a dozen times a day through a flimsy contraption that could collapse at the first nudge.", but ships pass under bridges all the time. IIRC, in Baltimore's case, I'm not even sure you can exit the inner harbor without going under that bridge.

- "The people of Baltimore have benefited for years of a port facility literally downtown, which is practically the same thing as building houses in a flood zone. Should have never been permitted!" Ports are literally designed to be on water, and the comparison makes no sense. Combined with the exclamation points, I don't think this is serious.

- "I hope “We The People” accepts the responsibility for their actions!" This is comedic. You have the excess exclamation point, and it even implies that we're collectively to blame for this.
The article title cracks me up. As if anyone in the Whitehouse even thinks about this. Why don't they just say NASA.
The 730 & 750 load microcode from cartridge tape (TU58). The 780/785 had a 'front end processor' (a baby PDP-11) which loaded microcode from floppies.

It's a waste of gates in the CPU.

Couple of things. First, VAX was designed when lots of stuff was still written in assembly, so they threw the kitchen sink at it. You didn't have a stdlib, you had huge numbers of assembly instructions. That wasn't how things evolved, but hindsight is 20-20, as they say. Second, C wasn't top-of-mind when designing VAX. The DEC systems programming language equivalent was BLISS, which is quite different than C. And FORTRAN & COBOL were probably more important.

And, yes, the folks who came up with RISC often cite the baroque nature of the VAX instruction set as inspiration for stripping things down. But there again, not driven by C per se; the first VLSI RISC, the IBM 801 (later PC RT), was targeted for a language called PL.8, a descendant of PL/I.
Are any of those besides Tesla even close to alive? Last I heard Rivian and Canoo were bleeding money.
Are you a professional pen tester? Wow, we have not gotten that bug before. We'll look into that.
They're great because the accountability for fuckups goes on the system, not on the people using the system. "Oops, the system had a bug" doesn't kill careers like "Oops, I made a bad call."
Have you guys considered htmx before going that way? If you can share pro/cons I'd love to hear.
Dogs are domesticated animals though. Can they actually survive in that scenario, in general? I would expect most of them would end up starving to death, or escaping to the larger area.
Amsterdam Airport Machine Learning Model Predicts Baggage Arrival Time
Depends on the CPU, in some architectures the stack pointers had low finite capacity before overflowing.
A common case that doesn’t seem illegal or immoral to me at least is people assembling groups of related properties in order to combine them.

So like if you want to buy all the buildings on a block, or something like that, and want to pay fair market value for all instead of being gouged for the last few.

I suppose that’s arguable either way on policy grounds but it seems reasonable to me.
The article is unreadable on any platform that I've tried, including the archive scrapers, apparently proving that people upvote based on titles.
But it does.

No, it doesn't, no matter how many times you assert otherwise.

I’m not the one making blanket statements about why people work shitty jobs.

Yes, you are.
3 downvotes in 16 minutes, well I never! (but oddly no other response)
Hmm, I know we're weak in explaining the value - we're working on a demo video so hopefully that helps. The product's changing so fast that our demo videos usually get outdated fast.
If privacy was the only reason they would allow any company in any country to be anonymous and identifiable when requested with legitimate reasons (like Domain Names) and accessible to journalists.
Jpegli: A new JPEG coding library
The original thread has now been restored by mods

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39918245
> This is simply not a concern for much of the US where density is low, parking lots are huge, and street parking is a rarity. You can live your entire life in swathes of the country and never once need to parallel park.

What about garages in homes? I've seen plenty of photos of massive trucks parked outside or sticking out because they cannot fit inside.

> It's not as big a difference as you might imagine. The widely criticized big Ford F-150 gets 21 MPG combined and a smaller Maverick gets 25.

And a Ford Focus does 30-40 mpg depending on travel type. A Renault Clio does 47 mpg. Both can fit the same amount of people, just less cargo.

> I think they're bad for the world because they make passengers safer at the expense of everyone else on the road.

You're also forgetting the outsized impact on roads that everyone else pays for and the extra pollution everyone else is breathing.
Wow, thanks for all the links. I hadn't realized you really meant book - I thought by their book on Higher Order Software you meant Hamilton's and Zeldin's paper Higher Order Software—A Methodology for Defining Software [1], which I managed to get through the local university library.

[1] https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1702333
It was immediately challenged as soon as citizens could get standing this year

A judge ruled it unconstitutional - narrowly only for the organizations and their members that filed the case - and its currently being appealed by the US gov

its going to the 5th circuit though so rich people don't have to do anything, this regulation is DOA

its interesting what cases make headline news and whats relegated to law journals
Do you not want people to contact you easily? Putting your LinkedIn would make it much easier to contact regarding hiring you.
Wasn't that how Tesla started, making an electrified version of a Lotus Elan?
Would you be able to further expand on those conversations in your mind? What tasks specifically don't get completed? Has anything ever worked before?
Trademarks only apply to specific classes of things. https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/basics/goods-and-services