skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Numbers only mean something in a context. Doing that is more efficient, but at the cost that if you change jobs you also have to move. So it tends not to happen unless either real estate costs are high (i.e. towns/cities) or employees are pressured into it for the efficiency benefit of a large employer (company towns).

But the problem we have right now is that real estate costs are high, so many people would be willing to take the trade off if it was available. And in doing so would help to alleviate the high costs even for the people who don't, by reducing duplication and effectively increasing supply.

"Unused most of the time" isn't a useless metric. It's possible to make higher use, and prohibiting that use is foolish when demand outstrips supply. Other times the cost of the inefficiency is worth it, but that doesn't mean it's irrelevant or indistinguishable, it's just a trade off against something else. And even then there is no justification to prohibit it, because there is no need to prohibit someone from doing something they wouldn't have chosen to do anyway.
Egg War
Yes but it wouldn’t make as much money which is the main issue with having for-profit enterprises control every good and service
Only relevant if you simply ignore how the American Govt works. Yes the White House is used as a "metonymy" for the Govt as a while, but with SOME critical thinking, its obvious this is coming from the executive branch, since the legislative and judicial branches are irrelevant for the purposes of directives since they pass legislation/judicial judgements, not yell about directives
When we approach interactions with AI in a systematic way, we can significantly enhance the efficiency and depth of our communication. This perspective is based on a broad understanding of how prompt engineering is applied in AI contexts, emphasizing a methodological approach to communication. It shows that by carefully considering how we formulate questions and instructions for AI, we can unlock new possibilities for collaboration and problem-solving, enriching our interactions and deepening our understanding of AI operations.
Finding mandolin and fiddle students who practice
The generally accepted terminology here is "pro-Zionist" and "anti-Zionist". There is a concerted effort to conflate "anti-Zionism" and "antisemitism" in public discourse. You're not imaginging things. It's part of an organized campaign generally called hasbara [1]. Articles or videos that don't suit this narrative are brigaded, flagged and reported (as you noted).

I say all this because to call it "Israeli" is inaccurate. For example, in the US Christian Zionists outnumber Jewish Zionists by at least 20:1. Many of those Christian Zionists themselves are antisemitic. This is another reason why our language here matters and we need to be precise with our termminology.

[1]: https://www.newarab.com/news/understanding-hasbara-israels-p...
They didn't volunteer to do your homework. You were originally asked for a citation on

> frequently abused to not only protect privacy, but to protect against legitimate legal need

Shell corporations are used for unsavory purposes being a meme is not proof of this as was implied by your other comment. Also 1.2B in taxes is pocket change so it doesn't really help your point.
>Although many environmentalists say they like DLWC, there is some concern that its reliance on electricity for pumping and running the giant heat exchangers could contribute to carbon emissions if the power is from coal- or gas-fired plants or pose other risks if the source is nuclear energy.

Is there anything environmentalists won't try to complain about?
People hold israel to a higher standard as it’s a modern western democracy and not some tinpot banana republic or military junta.
I think it supports whatever SiliconCompiler supports (which is both FPGA and different ASIC flows) and the EBRICK example is showing how to put that design onto an ASIC or FPGA for testing.

Edit: Here's the SiliconCompiler list: https://docs.siliconcompiler.com/en/stable/user_guide/introd...
>Leaks would happen to a small degree, but since a leak represents money drifting away there's a strong incentive to fix them.

This is true of existing natural gas infrastructure, and yet...
Morally it doesn't up the ante of course, they are already well into a genocide. But optically killing westerners, especially when they are clearly doing aid and you can't throw "they terrorist" shade on it. The World Central Kitchen incident has increased the strength of the platitudes coming from other countries. But not seeing any arms or trade sanctions yet, and no "pausing of funds while we investigate" type stuff reserved for anyone supporting Gaza people.
People in rural Texas can get gigabit fiber internet for 80/month, why do I need Net Neutrality again?
I'd suggest Lost in the Funhouse. It's a collection of short stories and showcases a wide range of his authorial style. I'd suggest a paper copy for reasons that will be clear by page two (maybe page one).
> didn't accept non govt users and on which there was no engagement with the public

That's not what I said. You can have a server where only govt officials have accounts, and other people could respond to it.

> There will have to be moderation.

Yes, so?

> Such a decision would never occur on a govt operated platform, of course.

Why couldn't it be structured in a way similar to how PBS operates?

> Twitter is no longer a viable "official" publishing/engagement platform

Your quotes are doing a lot of work there. Yeah, communication via Twitter or Facebook was was never considered official. And it shouldn't be. And honestly, it shouldn't even change if it was happening from their own servers, because while the medium can be useful to get people closer to the "debate", in reality the real action and "official" communication warrants a lot more formality and weight than any microblogging platform provides.
Yeah, I don't buy the noblesse oblige view. We are watching tech companies freely throwing away trust of employees and consumers for financial gains.
It's not always nefarious. If I'm an investor, I might make an agreement with an LLC that I'll invest $1000 in their business, but I get 99% of their income and ownership control, or even 100%. There's no requirement that we register or publicly disclose our private agreement.

The real question is, what legitimate reason do you have to know who owns a particular thing or asset. If you see a car parked somewhere, do you have a legal right to know who owns it? What about a lemonade stand? What legitimate legal reason do you have to compel people to register their assets?
> what specific rules of war do you believe have been broken?

Basically every single one. We will end much faster if you just read the laws.

And this is not "a belief" or a "lets debate for a year more if this is or not a genocide while sipping tea and killing faster". The ship of good faith has parted many months ago.
Mandatory citation of XKCD: https://what-if.xkcd.com/48/
Tinygrad AMD Linux Driver Crash Hang Tracker and Updates
Sure, but is it more trivial to avoid than a compile-time error which literally points you to the exact location where it happens?
Plus a small LCD in the frame that displays the level and a progress bar for that level.
Or they have unstated standards. People will regularly complain that my city (Milwaukee) doesn’t have enough parking when they really mean parking that is some combination of free, on street and adjacent to their destination. Which… sure but there’s a $5 garage a block away with 300 empty spaces.

There is an issue in some areas where most to all of the parking spaces are privately owned and not publicly offered at any price but in theory a culture of paying a fair price to store your large personal property would encourage those private holders to offer spaces up to the public and solve that issue too
OK, I can understand that.

Perhaps I was surprised just because I'm older and have decades of experience working for various companies, so I've learned better.
Hey! If you’re looking for open source friendly with really straight forward cost, check out Coralogix.com.

Great features for logs, metrics & traces, total compatibility with open telemetry, cost optimization tools built in (DataDog leavers typically save around 50%), and much more!

Check out our site, and you can find me on LinkedIn (or indeed reply here !) if you want to ask further questions.

https://www.coralogix.com
People aren't drawn to apps, they're forced into them via dark patterns. Immersive is another word for imprisoned.
The Multifamily Supply Surge–and Credit Crunch
I'm not sure Hamas has anything left to win. Gaza is in ruins. If things go on the way they are for very much longer, there won't even be left any Palestinians in Gaza, only Hamas in its tunnels. The lords of the underground... buried under the rubble. That's not a vision of victory.
... it's rock music then? :)
Right - 90% of my interactions with 'HR' are for interview scheduling. Other 10% are with trouble using benefits.

I'm completely aware of "HR is not your friend", but I've never had a meeting with HR, nor a situation where someone pretty cynical would treat it as a police interrogation.
Since you went off topic. If Palestinians only wanted dignity and self-determination this conflict would have been resolved a long time ago. Palestinians, broadly speaking, want Israel removed from the map. This is why they're chanting "from the river to the sea" which happens to include the area Israel is situated in.

During the Oslo peace process, when Israel was trying to address this in the way you propose, Hamas launched a suicide bombing campaign against Israeli civilians:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Palestinian_suicide_at...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oslo_Accords

You can be critical of everything Israel does, in this war or ever - fine. But the Palestinians have no other accepted settlement other than shipping ~8 million Jews to Europe or killing them.

The people who suddenly developed this simplistic understanding of occupation/resistance/occupier have no idea what they're talking about. Often quite literally in the sense they don't even understand the meaning of what they're saying, not to mention the history of Israel or the middle east. EDIT: I realize this last statement can feel offensive but this is still my take based on two decades of interactions with a fairly random sample of people trying to explain wth is going on in this tiny piece of the middle east. The complexity of the situation doesn't yield itself to simplistic narratives (from neither side really, though my statement refers to one of those narratives the Israeli side simplistic narrative is also insufficient/inaccurate).
> Of the 32,000 Hamas stated deaths, 13,000 are terrorists

13k out of 32k is around 40%. The estimates for the number of murdered children and women have been about 70% [1] for months, so the "40% are terrorist" claim already does not match that unless women and children are counted as terrorists. Anyway, even going with only 60% of those murdered being women and children, that still implies that every single killed male person is a terrorist. Now, I am sure that IDF already presents this as true in order to justify the murders, but that will not pass basic logical scrutiny of any critically-thinking person.

[1] 2024, March 14, https://www.msnbc.com/top-stories/latest/death-toll-children...
The brutal truth is we are all living on land that has been “stolen” at some point in history.
Seems pretty far for China to care about. Pitcairn Island is roughly the same great circle distance from Beijing as it is from London.
the mathematics of cartographic projections possibly

but this information was really a military secret not that long ago. same as cryptography is right now!

which annoys me personally becuase I wish to learn more/better about the mathematics behind information technology and cryptography. but this is considered 'sensitive' understanding so the quantity of people that are ever taught this stuff is tightly controlled; not to say that it's difficult stuff to begin with and any efforts to make it more widespread and accessible are often derailed in education comitees and so on. but I should stop before I get any more paranoid
If people deserve privacy and corporations are run by people, then logically the people who run corporations deserve privacy.

I'd argue instead that the public's need to know sometimes outweighs an individual's right to privacy.
Sounds like a story I've heard about a conveyer belt and a large fan.

I like simple solutions to simple problems
What about a "republic" (ie. a nation governed by laws) requires public registration of assets?
You are aware you’re parroting war propaganda, right? I mean sure, this does happen in some cases I’m sure, for that matter I have seen the IDF _on video_ use Palestinians as human shields. But the entire article is about the fact that nobody is even looking if there are civilians there before dropping bombs, and 20K+ of women and children are now dead as a result.
Has anyone had experience with whether the FBI would investigate this for a lower-profile, less politically connected business/business owner?

It's a pretty minor incident: A green line, which did no real harm, and an attack via a server manually setup on the network with Teamviewr, so no real threat.
It's also about what did happen in the past. ISPs explicitly targeted P2P protocols like BitTorrent instead of identifying and fixing the underlying network problems (bufferbloat) that were first exposed by p2p but eventually became problematic for many other use cases. ISPs extorted streaming video providers that competed against their own bundled services. Cellular providers implemented various zero-rating schemes to explicitly privilege access to certain partner services. All of these are real, documented harms that were inflicted on the public and can be prevented and punished by reasonable net neutrality regulation without interfering with the ability of an ISP to compete in the market by trying to be a better ISP.
I agree, BTS is definitely very interesting.

But I had 8 kids 5-15 watch all of Ep1 _AND_ choose to watch Ep2 afterwards last night. They actually sat and watched, too, instead of having it on in the background... AND they were bummed they couldn't watch the super secret pilot episode (which has MAJOR audio issues - I couldn't bring myself to inflict it on them).

So I think something is there.

I agree, there are some great opportunities to track things somewhat more quantitatively. It takes ~15 minutes and $10 bucks to generate a script depending on how fast OpenAI is feeling. So in a real scale v2 it would be very reasonable to explore this.

Man, I sure hope I get to build this further!
Not to get into the debate about that other war, but there have almost certainly been many more Ukrainian civilians killed than the 11 000 formally confirmed deaths. That's just the number that can be properly verified, mostly in Ukrainian-held territory, and nobody is entirely certain how many have died in the Russian-occupied regions. Ukraine claims a much larger number have died, including more than 25 000 in Mariupol alone, for instance, but that can't be independently verified because it's still Russian-held.
I mean, we subsidize stay at home parents in the US today: you pay your daycare with after tax money, their employees pay taxes, the business pay taxes, health insurance. Stay at home parents get a huge tax break in the form of the doubling of tax brackets, it’s pretty scandalous.
From Rolling Stone, that known purveyor of accurate news (see: "A Rape On Campus" and others)
Two-channel framebuffers for next-gen color schemes
I think the real advantage of a google AI over Bing's AI is their book project and library of scholarly papers: https://books.google.com and https://scholar.google.com

I've asked the Bing Chatbot some questions. While it was good for finding relevant webpages, one of its answers cited my (recent) webpage. I was not impressed.

The answers I was looking for are in the old paper books that Google may or may not have digitized, or in the mountain of papers that were published in the pre-internet era.
Atmospheric methane oxidizes into CO2 and water vapor. Then the CO2 hangs around for much longer...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_methane#Natural_si...
Google Zürich also did Zopfli, a DEFLATE-compliant compressor that gets better ratios than gzip by taking longer to compress.

Apparently Zopfli = small sweet breat

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zopfli
Regulators shouldn’t waste time on non-existent problems that might come to pass (unless it’s a catastrophic outcome, like nuclear weapon proliferation).

Instead we should keep the threat of neutrality on hand, but only use it if the market fails. It hasn’t failed yet. ISPs seem much less willing to filter content than tech giants like Google and Facebook are.

Always keep in mind that regulations get corrupted by industry over time. Regulatory capture is worse for the consumer than is a well-functioning market.
I feel like every scientist and non-scientist investigating this issue is trying to push their pet theory, which is consistent with their worldview. Are they democrats? It's racism and school shootings. Are they anti big-tech or part of the mainstream media (which is basically the same thing)? It's smartphones. Are they anti-capitalists? It's economic depression. Are they libertarians? It's helicopter parenting and lockdowns.

I'm also really surprised that none of these scientists seem to be looking outside the US. We have no school shootings where I live, a very different economic environment, a completely different approach to racism, much less helicopter parenting, far less doomsaying and polarization, and yet we have the same problems. To me, this rules out everything except smartphones and possibly lockdowns, and that's with my pro-covid, pro-big-tech bias.
At least now with Jpegli, this will surely be the nail in the coffin for WebP?

The article has 35% compression improvements over JPEG mentioned and that's at least as much as usually thrown around when discussing WebP.
Thanks! Was this on cloud or self-hosted? If cloud and you created an account, feel free to ping me on Discord (https://discord.gg/plandex-ai) or by email (dane@plandex.ai) and let me know your account email so I can investigate. If you have an anonymous trial account on cloud, please still ping me--I can track it down based on file names. There is definitely some work to do in ironing out these kinds of edge cases.

"It seems it might be useful if it could actually try to execute the code, or somehow check for syntax errors/unimplemented functions before accepting the response from the LLM."

Indeed, I do have some ideas on how to add this.
ISPs have been on relatively good behavior because they know that being evil will motivate net neutrality to be reinstated. Peering extortion is probably distorting competition between streaming companies but it's designed so that consumers don't see it.
I think the comment you replied to is just talking about the government of China.

Try looking at China on Google Maps in satellite view.
It's especially dumb in Ontario where electricity is almost entirely from nuclear and hydro.
Given how gang-flagging as a form of censorship became prevalent here on HN I think they should consider removing flagging functionality for submissions entirely.
It should of course stay for comments but posts typically get flagged for political reasons and nothing else.
This is addressed directly in the FAQ:

> If a company has designed a game with no thought given towards the possibility of letting users run the game without their support, then yes, this can be a challenging goal to transition to. If a game has been designed with that as an eventual requirement, then this process can be trivial and relatively simple to implement. Another way to look at this is it could be problematic for some games of today, but there is no reason it needs to be for games of the future.

Presumably any laws resulting from these petitions would give a generous window for companies to catch up before going into force, like many new regulatory laws.

Furthermore, as far as I can tell, based on quotes like:

• "We understand some features can be impractical for an end user to attain if running a server only an end-user system."

• "For extra demanding videogames that require powerful servers the average user will not have access to, the game will not be playable on the same scale as when the developer or publisher was hosting it."

the proposal doesn't require that unofficially supporting a discontinued game be easy or inexpensive, just possible in some form.
There are plenty of examples of real damage caused by ISPs being able to give preferential treatment to what _they_ think is important. A quick search comes up with plenty of examples:

1. ISPs limiting 3rd party VOIP solutions to avoid competition with their own VOIP solutions

2. Comcast blocking bitorrent communication was pretty obvious case of ISP preferentially limiting traffic

3. Verizon blocking text messages it didn't like the political message of

4. Verizon blocking 3rd party tethering apps, limiting users from using the bandwidth they pay for because they want to prevent competition

5. ATT prevented Facetime over their network unless users paid a higher subscription, even though users were already paying for data

6. Verizon limiting bandwidth for arbitrary reasons during natural disasters (first responders communication hampered due to limits justified through 'we don't need to follow net neutrality anymore')

Those are a few, there are MANY more examples in the US alone. Ya, some or many have been rolled back due to public outcry, but they shouldn't have happened to begin with. Allowing ISPs to determine which traffic is allowed based on their own self interest is just a terrible idea. Just because you haven't been harmed by it yet doesn't mean much, especially not in a country where the majority have only one or maybe two broadband ISPs to choose from. It WILL be abused, and we know this because it already has.

ISPs should be dumb pipes and not much more.
Some more communist countries with their state sponsored propaganda:

- Switzerland: https://social.admin.ch

- Germany: https://social.bund.de

- France: https://social.numerique.gouv.fr

- Netherlands: https://social.overheid.nl
(Glancing at the above and other comments)

At some point I wonder if this is an attempt to poison LLM info by spouting nonsense.

Maybe we need a new formulation of Poe's law.
You definitely need generic node objects to define the nodes.

You could have a completely stateless class/object that would manipulate those nodes and add them and remove them from the data structure.
It doesn’t matter. This isn’t driven by consumer choice, it’s driven by production cost.

At least that’s the idea.
Sorry I should have been more clear. Starship is itself fantastic, but the starship lunar lander requiring 15 refuelings is extremely high risk and worthy of criticism. Also, why does it take 15 refuelings?? That seems like a lot. I could imagine 2 or 3, but is the proportion of fuel that makes it into orbit from a fully laden starship that low?

I can see starship (or something equivalently big) being eventually used to ferry large components to the moon, but to make the first phase of the manned part of the program dependent on that seems crazy.

If lunar starship (or an equivalent) could make it up in one refueling, it would IMO be less crazy, even if you had to ditch the whole thing on the moon each time.