skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That has nothing to do with it. You responded to a comment saying "X makes it hard for the DoD to hire people" by saying "X doesn't affect procurement". If you actually realized they were talking about hiring, what you should have said is "they never have to hire anyone so the difficulty with hiring you are talking about is not relevant".
> without paying any sort of compensation to the redis developers.

Redis organization doesn't pay any sort of compensation to developers who contribute to redis source code. I do not see any difference here.
Sometimes I think about the 16th century monarchs in France and England. About the people they were surrounded with, the rituals, and primarily about the inequality and unfairness.

Map that to today and I am sure 500 years from now, people will look with the same disgust on todays society.

I am pretty curious what will come in between.
Isn't u-root also basically this?
Trademark, and it's licensed under BSD.

Basically Redis Inc is the one making the fork, which retains the Redis name since they purchased it from antirez.
> It just took 25 years to finally happen.

This is the Systems Thinking concept of systems delay, the time lapse between cause and effect, of an action and its downstream effects. Someone applying this cognitive skill, when informed of material changes like that fact that Boeing usurped some of the FAA's oversight, merged with with MD with its colorful history, etc., is bound to come to think of the effects of such changes and when their effects may start manifesting downstream, especially externally. In the case of Boeing, that means the safety of their aircraft.

When it comes to orgs that make essential contributions to society such as in commercial passenger aviation, I strongly prefer thorough and effective oversight by a competent and impartial body of that org's inner workings and output. Boeing had earlier established a strong reputation for safety and engineering competence. I have no problem with profits; that is what motivates capitalists in the system we have today, but I do have a problem with risking the lives and welfare of the uninformed public. With recent events, we learned the situation changed to foxes guarding the hen house.

Trust but verify indeed. That Boeing was able to so rampantly cut quality in the pursuit of revenues under the cloak of their sterling reputation seems in part to be a condemnation of greater society.

That is what oversight is supposed to be for, the delegation of trust so that we need not overwhelm ourselves in general life.
The best idea I've come up with is a license which only grants the rights to a natural person to use the software otherwise it is identical to the MIT, GPL or AGPL, whatever your cup of tea is.

If you're a corporation then you need to buy a license.
Normal Unix permissions do nothing here in a desktop context because the program is running under your account.
Anecdotal story: A few years ago I worked with ex-Boeing employees from Altus AFB. They were disgusted by the quality control of the delivered C-17 Globemasters. Construction garbage in the wall panels, etc. Like the article, their complaints only succeeded in labeling them as "troublemakers" within the company.
It's Elon. Do you really have to ask? It's the most braindead, arrogant, Elon Musky possible decision.
That's been going on for 30 years with proprietary BSD forks. That's what they signed up for.
The same should be said for engineering design docs tbh
Absolute banger.
But the auto-aim on vertical axis is missing. You should be able to have the crosshair under an enemy and still hit them.
But in any case, nicely done!
> And that's money in your pocket at that point not an IOU like a pending transaction at a US bank

In Australia, we have instant transfers between bank accounts.

I imagine the US will get to that point soon in which case there is no benefit to crypto for this use case.
https://youtu.be/KZYqL79GDXU

Magic black box yield farming at 21:29 timestamp.
nice, maybe every number should have it's own similar page

42 is an obvious choice. Picked at random while gazing through the garden window, so claimed the author, be we all know the truth; there are 42 young tableaux of size 3x3, which represent some of the fundamentals of the universe and everything

lol
Well in the story is the point of an software error leading to the plane crash right...
The issue isn't when you get what you're wanting. The issue is when either you accidentally get something you didn't want (such as type-o squatting - a not too distant issue on PyPi) or a package was published maliciously (imagine bumping a patch version and it being compromised) - a few fairly recent issues on npm.

I agree that the happy path is ideal and hopefully the common case. Regardless, anything with access to production secrets for my team is run on the most minimal image possible (and none of those secrets are available during dependency installation and compilation).
Differences in how men and women perceive body signals could have implications
Autosave is table stakes for good editors
I like the angle and skepticism, but the experiment would still need to overcome the challenge that the philosophically rigorous way to confirm a consciousness is to be that consciousness.
Is it actually ASCII art or just a textual encoding? The art representation is nice for looking under the hood and seeing something pretty, but I feel like that is a very far from optimal way to textually encode Doom for a language model to process. Especially since there is no pitching the camera, you can encode all of the information you need to represent a frame in a single line of ASCII. It they are actually using an ASCII art representation, I bet they would get way better performance encoding the frame as a single line of text.
"Meta said it rolled out end-to-end encryption "for all personal chats and calls on Messenger and Facebook" in December. And in 2018, Facebook told Vox that it doesn't use private messages for ad targeting.1 But a few months later, The New York Times, citing "hundreds of pages of Facebook documents," reported that Facebook "gave Netflix and Spotify the ability to read Facebook users' private messages.""

1. "Does Facebook use info from your private messages to target you with ads?

No. Facebook says it might look at your private messages to determine if they violate the company's policies, but it doesn't use that information for ad targeting. Facebook won't use the contents of your private messages to target you with ads on Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp or Instagram either, according to a spokesperson."

https://www.vox.com/2018/4/11/17177842/facebook-advertising-...

If the messages are encrypted "end-to-end" or whatever the chosen marketing buzzwords, so that Facebook cannot read them, then how is FB able to "use" messages for anything. One accustomed to normal communications services might think FB is storing and delivering messages and that's all. But in truth, it's "using" them. (For purposes other than complying with any request from a court of comptent jurisdiction.)

Exactly what they might be doing is of course highly confidential. You are free to take guesses. FB may answer yes or no. Answers cannot be verified, so their value outside of marketing is dubious.

NB. Meta _is_ a third party. It feels as if some people believe they can redefine terms like "end-to-end", "third party", etc. As if they know many readers will happily go along for the ride.
Wife had to get an ambulance ride a few years ago in the US. She was apprehensive of getting it because this - wrong - information is repeated over and over online. It and the hospital trip cost a few hundred with insurance. This is why we don't listen to people on the internet.
Exactly: look how fast the values of companies like MySpace and Yahoo tanked when they became irrelevant. They were highly valuable at some point, but they had serious competition and not much keeping their users locked-in.
Open care integrated mental health
Why not teach cops to shoot bows, put them on motorcycles, and pass them some GPS-tracker-carrying suction darts to shoot as arrows?
[dupe]

More discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39841984
Probably posted because of this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6iQrh2TK98

Which not only links to this website, but also explains the topic in detail. Can highly recommend the channel anyway — especially for the HN crowd.
weather so extreme, that surface structure cant be maintained
Nice, that's definitely a sweet deal
> would be shared with an advertising partner

In this case Netflix was not an advertising partner. You were signing into Facebook Chat inside the Netflix chat, and participating in Facebook chat messages inside the Netflix app.

You were opting in and using the Netflix app as a Facebook Chat client. Its like being surprised the Pidgin executable could see your Jabber messages.
You're not winning hearts and minds by implying poor people would be violent lawless creatures raping and pillaging the world on a whim.
Sounds like pure luck. My ambulance was “out of network” (as if I had any choice in the matter) and the charges were “unreasonable” for the services provided per the insurance company. They initially billed me for $7k. I eventually got the insurance to pay $3k of that. So $4k out of pocket.

[edit to add this]

I did hear on the radio that a bill was passed in California recently to help fix this to some extent but I don’t recall the details. I believe it goes into effect mid-2024.
As someone who routinely teaches (Non-STEM) university students practical applications of math I can assure you that none of the students that told me "I am bad at maths" went out of my class without an understanding of the topics we talked about.

Yet I routinely hear a: "Wow, if they told it to me this way during school I might have cared!" or "It really made my head smoke, but it felt good."

Step 1 is believing that every person that doesn't have cognitive problems can understand an abstract concept if it is explained well and they got the motivation to understand it. Then you need to create a situation which motivates them to understand it and now you only need to explain it well.

Many math teachers fail already at step 1. They believe 90% of their students are too stupid to understand things, while this is just a convinient explaination for their own failures. I once was convinced of being that student.

I met one kid that I couldn't teach anything because he would forget things I told him 15 minutes befoee. He was a refugee from Afghanistan and severely traumatized.

The truth is that we should look to the best when teaching and we would be stupid if we didn't. And the best are people like 3blue1brown. If your class falls significantly below such a level of clarity and engagement it will suck. During my own math education I had teachers that left out the most fundamental applications. E.g. something like an integral has clear applications, it is a new super power with which you can solve new problems — yet all we did was learning a receipe and solving abstract problems. The fact that it was a super power was something I had to figure out myself, later.

And this was common. I even was lucky because I had a good physics teacher who managed to being up a lot of what we learned in math and give it a more practical feel, but most of my friends from other schools were not so lucky.
It is a known fact that ageism is everywhere in tech and will impact you. But we don't seem to believe the same about racism or sexism. Is this one of those cases where people who complain about ageism are simply low-value?
That 1 will go and actually do amazing things with it. maybe invent a new application of the mathematics or invent new mathematics. The other 49 will forget it as soon as its no longer something to learn on an exam.
Are they willing to contractually commit to not holding the user's data, with penalties? If not, they're not serious.

Remember "Facebook - It's free and always will be."
They are absolutely massive. And that must fire at more than 30mph too surely?
What the community manages to do is amazing... but I still wonder why all these hackable devices use such low power chips.

So many things on the market are basically just computers with specialized IO, but most of the firmware and MCUs don't reach the full potential of the rest of the hardware.

A few extra dollars could add literally hundreds of features if they wanted.
Why put it behind a login? There is no easier way to guarantee I won't even try it.
It’s controversial I know, but I think that passive investing should be banned. Funds are just blindly dumping money in companies regardless of performance (after the company gets to whatever threshold), it’s distorting the market.
I believe a community forum is absolutely vital for an "ecosystem" company. There needs to be a town square where people can discuss ideas and share feedback about that particular ecosystem.

OpenAI has a pretty active forum with moderators replying and helping out all the time.
Grin's Mimblewimble?
Agreed, and that’s how it would work. I was more highlighting the throwaway with comment that had no context or link to sources.
That would require another Boeing sized entity in the US, or a few of them.
extended:

The heated debate on climate crisis if there's one, like I said no one have
the power in predicting nor control the future. Average people are not
responsible for none of it besides they are not in control. We do not
understand the meaning for control and it's effects on our responsibilities.
The majority, thats 90% of the population will just go along with anything the
1% or 2% of people driving them into; without thinking. Possibility of 90% of
them reading this will go on thinking they are the 1% or 2%. It is like the
Georgia monument/stone, a well educated person would try behave when reading
the line saying our planet should limit it's inhabitant by 500 million. In his
or her mind, the good behaviour includes the person part of 500 million class.
It is the same thinking when we talk about everything, we just listening what
others preaching without using our critical thinking hat. The other key driving
factor is how divided we are, we don't even work with our siblings and that's
says it all. It is how successfully external factors influence and dividing us
away from our siblings. Strip a person from all supporting structure, made him
standing alone at a gun point in a firing range, then whisper in his ears it
is his responsibility?

The problem isn't the concern instead the solution for climate crisis does not
appears to be a solution at all. It is like this, you step into a restaurant,
nothing in restaurant are within our control. We eat our meal, pay for the
food and services, leave. The way I am seeing how this been address for
climate crisis, addition to payment for the food and services, you'll bring
your utensils, clean up after your meal and maybe bringing own food; still pay
more for it. I finding general population unaware of it, instead continue
embracing it, they bring own plastic bags for grocery shopping, as said
earlier they are not in control to held responsible. The so call the polluting
material was given to everyone in order gain something in return, we did not
ask for it nor have choice or options; nothing is free. We did not made the
decision nor responsible for it.

At airports, in-order to stop hazards from water container they provided free
drinking water. This works absolutely well, it removed all plastics bottle
entering airport. However, this will not work on general public places as
people can't be billed for water usage and private water companies wouldn't
like the idea. Worst, long term converting public water turning into private
plan will halt on it's track. This a solution works, but however we'll have
people aruge it will not work but spray the sky with unknown chemical cocktail
and force absorbing carbon gas will work, it will work because the 1% or 2%
said so. The sky spraying thingy, I still don't understand the land mass of
our planet is <30% but the spraying activity is on 30% of the area and not the
70%, what is the target?
Panpsychist here, much of the time at least. It sort of sneaked up on me.

It was initially a physics inquiry. I was playing with the idea that there is not "the" arrow of time, but instead "my" arrow of time, something arising from my biochemistry maybe.

Under this lens, the obvious candidates for consciousness are the ones whose arrows of time are all pointing in the same direction--because I can communicate with them (this is why most humans believe that humans are conscious).

The things that seem not to be conscious: lightning strikes, rocks, etc. these may just be the machinations of someone whose arrow of time is orthogonal to my own. Their future is my... left, or whatever (btw if you think this is a fun concept, you might enjoy the book "A Clockwork Rocket," which is about time and space, not consciousness).

I have no evidence that these things in fact are conscious, but I also have no evidence that they are not. But it's not just academic, I'll behave differently depending on how I chose:

- On the one hand you've got kooky behavior like listening to a waterfall and wondering what it's thinking.

- On the other hand you've got this loneliness and the idea that it can be solved with rocket ships or telescopes and the possibility that you'll overlook life right under your nose because you're too busy looking for something that looks like yourself.

Me? I'll take the waterfall.
What should the effective tax rate on wealth (assets) be?
As I'm exploring using a vector database for my CBT mental health counselor chatbot, this article's insights on the strengths of RAG and the potential benefits of integrating with a solution like MyScale are quite compelling. How could such an integration further enhance the conversational abilities and personalization of a counseling-focused AI assistant?
My question then is, what was the achievable goal? What is the end state for the country, do any U.S. troops need to be there permanently, and how does the society work such that the U.S. goals are achieved?
If he has any advantage, it would be that he paid attention to what made PARC work well at the time, and what working well actually feels like, and might be able to do something similar. OTOH, you're right, he could be ossified. The problem with an advisory role is no one has to listen to him, no matter how sensible he is.
>The used bookstore collapse from 2002-present has been a slow-moving, silent killer of independent bookstores. Davis, CA had a half dozen bookstores until Borders moved in. Then Borders went bust in 2011 and they were left nearly a book desert.

I don't get it: how would Borders put independent used bookstores out of business? People who want used books (either because they actually like old books, or because they want good prices) aren't going to find them at Borders or any other new bookstore. They're different markets.

>This mirrors, in a more minor way, food deserts that Walmart's expansion and contraction brings.

Same thing here: people who want quality food aren't going to shop at Walmart.
The only QED is your circular logic
He earned that one I think.
> By that point, remote disabling of vehicles might be mandatory.

Congratulations, you've created a massive black market in the US. If the penalties are stiff enough to actually prevent people disabling it, you've massively increased the prison population, too.
Ironically, Boeing's stock price was at about $140 at the start of 2014 -- and rose pretty steadily to a peak of $422 in March 2019.

So in addition to pushing out whatever sorts of financial results that Wall Street wanted, Boeing's perhaps questionable approach to quality was not registering with its financial overlords. This happened in spite of the Al-Jazeera investigative piece of 2014, a $2.5 billion penalty paid in 2021 in connection with the 787 crashes, etc. Not to mention steady coverage of problems in the Seattle Times, Wall Street Journal, etc.

Boeing's stock is still above $100 now, which suggests that it's got a strong enough monopoly/duopoly position that investors do not regard quality issues as being all that detrimental to the "investment thesis."

Brrr!
Your approach is gross. Blessing theft the way you do creates two victims, the one from whom it is stolen and one who is not steered towards a better way to live.

The US even still has tremendous opportunity to build a life and earn money. Stealing undermines one's ability and focus to build such a life and undermines the surrounding community as well.

You clearly think you're a great guy/gal/whatever for thinking that someone should be thrilled to be stolen from and you're oblivious to the nothing-but-more-misery this approach practically generates.
These are all a fair questions, but they’re still questions and not some confident assertion with absolutely no sources from a total throwaway account. That was my point.
In the number guessing trick popularised by David Blaine 37 is the most probable answer. 13, I think, is the second probable, which is interestingly 50 minus 37.

https://www.cs4fn.org/mathemagic/streetmagic.php
I remember trying an Ember mug at some point in the past (I don't remember which specific model - it wasn't the travel mug)...

It was awful. Only thing it could realistically do is keep an already hot drink hot - which by itself isn't bad if it didn't advertise itself as being able to make a not hot drink become hot.

Worse still, getting it to work with the app was a CONSTANT struggle. If you even managed to get it connected in the first place (only worked one out of 5-10 tries in my experience, usually requiring a full factory reset of the mug each time), it would automatically disconnect itself after a couple hours, requiring you to do the whole song and dance again.

Left a seriously bad taste in my mouth about Bluetooth devices as a whole.
This article has nothing to do with onavo.
no reason to downvote this
I'm not an expert on the guidelines, they exist somewhere though. Usually the original title is the right thing to use but, in this case, since it is so vague, it's probably why the post didn't get any engagement.
Actual article: https://gothamist.com/news/traffic-jams-airtags-and-gps-dart...
Google docs literally has the exact same feature and we're not even talking about it. Using the exact same OAuth framework as here you can grant Netflix and Spotify the right to read everything and all comments in your Google Docs. You can even grant them the right to read all your emails in Gmail!

In all seriousness i believe anyone providing oauth should just shut it down at this point, Cambridge Analytica was entirely users granting a third party oauth access to read their friends lists with an explicit permission dialog and all and it was a scandal that led to massive fines. The world decided that oauth access is not ok even with the dialogs prompting to allow third party access and at this point we as developers should listen and take it away. Google currently flys under the radar with the exact same access that led to cambridge analytica but they should probably just shut it down unless they want to run the risk of similar court cases.
For day to day concerns, Boeing does not appear to be an outlier.

My coworker loves the Boeing legacy, and in her staunch advocacy, she showed me this.

https://avherald.com/
"You can't have one local pencils, it would be the global pencils"
I suppose the square root of negative infinity has the property of being unreal in several distinct ways, but yeah, the least real? I dunno /s
They've had it for years, it was just opt-in. More recently they've applied it to everything.
was reading the comments before the article again. never heard of Vultr and assumed by the terms that it was some kind of niche social network. those terms are basically identical to Reddit's so it would make sense.

but a *VPS host*? that's absurd. it's like someone there asked ChatGPT for a new TOS without telling it what the TOS would be for.