skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> and everything else.

No. It's true for any library or framework that lack isolation or decoupling concepts.

In react (and many of the ones you mention) there is nothing on place that guides you into decoupling. It has nothing, not even conventions, that help a junior to put stuff in the right place (or to prohibit or make it difficult to put stuff in the wrong place).

Part of that is due to how in TS/JS everything can grope around in everything else. But the bigger part is lacking conventions, primitives and structure in the libs and frameworks.

Sure, a library (which react is) doesn't provide structure (it's a distinguishing trait from frameworks). But the many frameworks on top of React don't do a good job either. They either become some Enterprise Ready amalgamation of saga's, redux, message-bus, setups, or they offer too little guidance. And in all situations, it's still possible to just fire a fetch() or put data transforms or business logic within the UI. Only discipline keeps people from taking this "much easier" route.

And when only discipline stands between us and "the easier way for now", that "easier way for now" will be chosen, and pain in future will be felt.
Will the real Aggregator's AI Risk please stand up?
Some younger guy was trying to explain that I used the word cluster wrong when talking about clustering pins on a map. Cluster was a collection of servers in a server room. He had never heard about k-means :-)
This might be fun.
Offer to kiss people so the bacteria can transfer.
Requires at least X minutes to be effective.
Trying to have some Easter holiday, will send you an email after.
I think they likely meant "trawling": https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trawling. (ie casting a net and "fishing" for open ssh)
Dashlane Authenticator app to shut down
Try Delphi/Lazarus for just 10 minutes, then come back with a better metaphor. The productivity difference in comparison to React, Qt, GTK etc. is enormous. When was the last time you built the whole UI of a large app in 1 day?
Thought it would be, but I didn't want to state that more authoritatively as I'd not bothered checking the docs/source. And I'm lazy like that.
Am I missing something, or is this conflating TLS 1.3 with ephemeral key handshakes (which were available in earlier versions too, albeit not mandatory)?
Fascinating stuff. While I can understand the decision and defend it, how is it really any different from making mummies 'properly' buried according to our current rituals?
zmodem :)
My team actually likes it - but it’s run by the dev team so we actually talk about things we care about. Management participates too (I know they aren’t supposed to) but they are very supportive and can help elevate issues appropriately if needed
The crawlers can simply stop identifying themselves via custom user agent, can't they?

Also why are "AI" crawlers are worse than "normal" crawlers?

Either way, this is an exercise in futility.
Computer chips that they sell for a profit that they return to shareholders
So people that are good at their jobs should be kept on the brink of promotion for as long as possible?
Tokyo Tech Scientists Crack Hydrogen Storage Conundrum
This is one of the reasons for why I prefer C over Rust for reference implementations. I look at the code and I understand it much better than the Rust version.
Alternative take: Punishing a company because it's selling out Americans in favor of cheap labor.
But Trump cannot function as a Girardian scapegoat for society as a whole. He has too many backers. Too many people identify with him.
Your brother's idiot son doesn't get a no show job if you use the stick.
Somebody messed up some COBOL script.
If Intel is so important to national security, it should be nationalized. If Intel is not willing to willingly invest into U.S. manufacturing, it can be targeted with tariffs. A corporate handout by the taxpayer is not what should happen, though. And yes, stock buybacks are a form of market manipulation. That's why they were banned before Reagan.

Funnily enough, SEC unbanned stock buybacks by using the Chevron deference, which is currently being challenged in courts. EPA being unable to regulate climate change might be offsetted by a minor win of making SEC not ignore law anymore by asserting its legitimacy.
I live in Brooklyn and have a rarely used car. I'm 100% onboard with taking the train, walking, or biking. There should be so many more open streets as well.

The only issue I have with any of this is when I want to LEAVE the city. I pay tolls on the way out and on the way in currently that get me close to $30. Now it's closer to $45 if I enter the zone.
I will have to be satisfied with being a foot-soldier in the online user generated content wars. Alas.
This makes complete sense because, as we all know, AI companies are very concerned with respecting the rights of the people they steal data from, and totally won't just ignore this.
Do you really think giving examples of complacency due to fear to an authoritarian regime and a social change process that ultimately resulted in a democratic change somehow disproves my point?

I don’t want an authority that is so feared that the people are afraid to speak out against it or cannot be changed.
My grandmother was the 2nd youngest of 9 sisters, so they weren't that young when they had her, but I don't know the exact age. Her dad killed himself when she was a young child, alcoholism and war trauma among other things, and her mom passed from some illness.
There was no consent.
I would hazard a guess that the remains of a mummy still present interesting research opportunities, whereas the skin here is just skin, and there’s no real value in keeping it around other than the sensational. IIRC last time I was at the Museum of History in Ottawa they had noted that many of the indigenous artifacts on display are replicas - for many artifacts where they felt everything that they could learn had been learned, they have returned the originals to the people they were taken from. I feel this is a similar story.
We're always bending over backwards for a handful of companies instead of promoting a healthy market. We should of created a race with multiple companies to build the best chip factories.
"Every day as a parent I wish I was 15 years younger and my parents were too."

All people over 30 with they were 15 years younger. Age, miles, diseases and injuries gradually makes the body worser.
This is probably the best path forward for getting large enterprises not to block TLS 1.3 deployment but I can’t help but wonder how effective these monitoring systems actually are. There are so many ways to exfiltrate data and attackers have decades of prior art around obfuscating their activity, and it seems incredibly expensive to try to solve this problem at the network level rather than by committing that budget to better controls around sensitive data, locking down clients, etc.
Of course a lot of people would like financial independence. Young working women (and men) of today normally have almost no financial independence, because they are indebted or renters. They have to work a salary job or be out on the streets.

A stay at home mother in the past with a part time job had much more financial independence together with her husband than most working young people have today, even though they get fancy titles now.

Basically the current elderly generation used indoctrination to turn their children into serfs in some kind of foolish attempt to end humanity.

Also to remember is that traditionally in most cultures, the wife in the family controlled the household's finances.
I mean, the fact students spent decades challenging each other to touch it (and the library did nothing to prevent it) might be a start
Don't the companies, their industry organizations, and the people who own them lobby congress to make that tax law?

It seems to me that in that case, tax law is their fault.
Were mummies not usually aware of, and presumably consented, to mummification before death?

And then there’s the angle of sparing library staff from handling the human skin.
Software vendors dump open source, go for the cash grab
But it was exactly this "mess" of the accidentially opened PC platform what gave us the hardware cambrian explosion of the late 90s. Without this, Nvidia probably wouldn't exist, and everything that's not Apple would have an IBM logo slapped on ;)
Yeah I'm sure that's going to cause investors/other companies to think that the US is a good place to set up shop and/or make further investments.
I was 24 and still in college. This thread is full of people saying "I was a mess" or "I wasn't mature enough".

When we found out we were pregnant, I was working at a gas station, my off hours spent riding around in a truck with my friends yelling things at people walking by on the street for reactions. There's maturity and stability.

Now I'm "ahead" of many of those friends because I knew I needed to hurry up and get things done. Didn't have time to rage quit jobs. Didn't have time to sit around and make less because it was easier.

So I agree with you. It tells me a lot about being responsible and mature. Most won't until they have to, and a kid has that effect.
I wish I could witness the dressing room discussions of the French authorities when they have to deal with these holier-than-thou Harvard "ethicists", while pretending to take them seriously so as not to upset them.

edit: next step, harvard ppl studying the consent about random ossuaires in France https://www.cntraveler.com/galleries/2014-10-24/10-creepiest...
But EPS rises so equilibrium would suggest the price of the share would almost certainly rise to match the old EPS.
You read a lot more into my comment than is actually there, which is probably the reason for your rather flippant and response.

In Europe, insect meat is still extremely rare, and where it is to be found, it is experimental and expensive. The latter will of course change through economies of scale once they reach a certain stage.

However, the public perception of insects as food is very different. I have never or heard seen a sulky "I will not eat ze bugs" comment in my language, the whole"globalists want you to eat bugs" conspiracy is mostly unknown, and would be seen as foolish.

I have not said that eating insects is the norm, but many here see it as part of the diet of the future, without that squeamishness that seems to be so prevalent in the US.

If I were to respond in the same tone as you, I would imply that you already knew that, but didn't want to let a chance pass to make yourself the victim, as Americans often like to pretend that all Europeans look down on you. However, I actually believe this is just a misunderstanding.

I know I probably won't get any information from you, since you now see me as a debate opponent instead of a discussion partner, but I was genuinely interested in the reason for the extreme opposition to insect food in the US. Maybe since English is my second language, which I learned in part by reading a lot of rather old books, my grammar and word choices are hindering me in making myself clear.
You can still organise fancy gala dinners for politicians and their friends and family, at a cost of merely hundreds of dollars per head.
One factor may be that people who are very xenophobic tend to actively avoid living in areas with a lot of immigrants.
This is a myth. Cheap labor is a benefit but not the primary reason companies are manufacturing in the U.S. today.

Look at TSMC. It started setting up US operations years ago and is expecting to complete many years from now.

OTOH they started setting up in Japan about a year or so ago and are already cranking out chips.
If your house had problems with condensation forming on the outside then I hope it never rains where you are.
Supporting languages isn't the arch maintainers job I srsly don't understand your argument if all language stuff (LSP, language, debbuger etc.) work on every linux distro without any modifications is this distro "supported"?

If rustup will be removed from official repo we can argue that rust isn't supported in arch?
Wikipedia suggests that "100-year-old" and "pioneered by Henry Ford" are more folklore than fact:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_line#History

And assembling ships & submarines from large, prefabricated sections was pretty routine in WWII.

(It'd be nice if Tesla can manage this, but no bets.)
I had a failed business venture and when I was truly ready to give up I found a listing for a job at a startup company that was trying to do something similar to what I was trying to do and I was working for them in about three weeks.

If I was hiring for a startup I’d be more inclined to hire someone who tried to start something and failed that I would be to hire somebody who worked at Facebook and Google and had internalized the processes there.

People might have a different attitude at a big company but I think startups appreciate people who can wear many hats and will figure out how to get something done whether or not it fits the job description exactly.
I believe the rationale here is that if you can source some gadget from China, it's going to be ten times cheaper than any alternative, since there's an enormous stock of those there used to to make other gadgets, therefore low margins and high turnover.

So that's where you look first.
> Since Americans tend to be heavily-armed paranoiacs

While the percentage of gun owners, or people living in a household with a gun owner are high...they aren't the majority.
seems to work pretty well check this out: https://huggingface.co/blog/embedding-quantization
I fear we've elevated 'consent' to absurd proportions. Every country in the world was built by those who didn't consent to build it (by serfdom, slavery, ..).

I hope this is preserved; what a pointless waste otherwise. How are we to imagine the deceased here? A person outraged at the insult, or one now doubly outraged at the waste?
Sometimes I wonder if Stalin had the right idea. Purge the leadership every so often to start with a clean slate. Of course this only works with bureaucracies and not things that require tons of experience. You also have to have somewhere for them to move on to if you don't want to murder them or ship them to Siberia.
Disclaimer: I am not an expert, but I understood this stuff pretty well 5 years ago.

If you have a single particle there is no local experiment that you can do to determine whether that is entangled to a particle somewhere else. You need to use both particles in the experiment in order to prove it one way or the other. Mathematically, this is due to the fact that the density function for one half of an entangled pair is the same as the maximally mixed state for one particle.

See CHSH[1] for an example of an experiment you can do if you have access to both particles and you want to show they are entangled.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHSH_inequality
By this reasoning, we should destroy all buildings that were constructed with slave labor; and all jewelry with gems acquired by similar means.
Meanwhile in the 1970's....

type
Planet = (Unknown, Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune);
PlanetContainer = record
gravity: real;
radiusKm: real;
massKg: real;
orbitKm: longint;
orbitDays: integer;
surfacePressureBars: real;
moons: integer;
rings: boolean
end;

var
planets : array [Planet] of PlanetContainer;
I guess time passed? There are no potential relatives to Tutankhamen that might make claims. I would be rather pissed if there was a book with my great grandmas mentally ill sister's skin on it.

In a similar vain, there are a lot of skeletons and organs collected from dead mental patients in universities that did not get proper consent.
> Already has plenty of money I assume,

That's beside the point. What's one thing almost all people with more money than they need, want? more.
This sort of open and stackable expansion module system wasn't uncommon at all for 80's home computer systems though.
Right, more R&D and more CAPEX. The question is not whether shareholders deserve any return on their investment (yes), the question is short term vs. long term focus. Same with Boeing (161% of Boeing profits given to shareholders 2013-2019, underinvestment in talent and safety).
Absolutely indefensible position. Destroying artifacts and evidence of the past simply because we don't agree with what happened in the past is a vile sin that our descendants will never forgive us for.
> How about AI from non-companies? Or genuinely non-profit or open projects?

AI from any project will allow AI to be used commercially, and thus I oppose it. Moreover, I oppose AI on various other princincples even independent of this: it further isolates people and can be used to develop other technologies that are too powerful for us to handle. In short, I believe human beings en mass are too stupid to use AI.

> Also - out of curiosity - do you use any AI yourself?

I do not, or at least I try my best not too. In fact, I hate AI with a passion. Obviously, there may be products here and there that have used AI that I in turn use. What can you do? But I attempt to minimize any contact I have with AI: I don't use Grammarly, any form of auto-suggest, I use an ancient phone (and I RARELY use it, I hate smartphones), I don't use AI features in software such as AI-noise reduction, I turn off all automatic features in software that may have some AI behind it.

If I find out a website uses AI for content generation, I ban it and never visit again.

The other day I downloaded a text editor that looked cool but I deleted it because I realized it has an AI-console (even though I never used it).

I also work for a business and I convinced them not to use AI. We're an online magazine and it turns out the vast majority of our readers supported that decision.

In short, I am against AI because I believe it provides virtually no benefits to humanity, only detriments.
Was expecting a similar rebinding
It allows you to store large amounts of energy when energy is cheap.
I have a short script [1] which generates a file status.json with the package date, version and count of lines of code (with cloc). This can then be used in GitLab to generate badges of those values, as [2].

[1] https://gitlab.com/jjg/cptutils/-/blob/master/bin/status-jso...

[2] https://gitlab.com/jjg/cptutils
> Bell's theorem says you either need to give up the idea that there is no "spooky action", or give up determinism

Can you not also say that the determinism includes the observer, aka superdeterminism (which is just determinism because that would surely be global).
As a kid this type of art fascinated me so much! And recently a friend shared with me something similar and I had to look up whether there is a name to this form of art and I found it on Wikipedia.
> We should of created a race with multiple companies to build the best chip factories.

That's insanely expensive. Today the only companies that make leading edge chips are TSMC, Samsung, and Intel. Global Foundries (headquartered in US) dropped out a few years ago because it was too expensive. How on earth are you going to fund "a race with multiple companies to build the best chip factories"? It's going to cost multiples of whatever the intel subsidy is.
i work in a fairly real-world industry (manufacturing QA, reliability), so there is by policy and law always a final human QA step. My job is not trying to remove that step, it's trying to remove the drudgery and fatigue of looking at shittons of guaranteed true negatives all day and giving the human operator only the weird stuff to figure out.
No, it is not. You seem very confident about this, which is concerning because you are incorrect.
Book photo and more details: https://www.reddit.com/r/literature/s/TdIZ4ONtB2
> you'd need to be unable to distinguish between a measured/unmeasured particle

This is true. There is no way to tell if a measurement you do happened on an entangled particle or on a "free" one.

You can only tell in retrospect, when you correlate results, which requires classical communication.
I had assumed this is related to sites like chatgpt going out and searching with a specific request.

Regardless, my original question is still valid. The companies have already shown a lack of care about the data they train off of. So if ethics have already gone out the window, what is to stop them from ignoring this file if they are not already.
This is missing a couple, one that comes to mind is `FriendlyCrawler`, which is most definitely not friendly, and very likely for AI
> embedding [..] never feel quite right.

funnily enough, I would argue that struct embedding is one of the things that Go actually got right. It's simple and elegant, and I think it could've been a useful addition to Rust.
Ideally this kind of subsidy would be paid any time the expected return on investment for the government was better than breaking even. It’s not about making sure only the most deserving get help, it’s about making sure everyone (including the most deserving) gets more.
They are going to court - science is a very different bar. Even if the science shows it is safe, someone will testify that it isn't and sway the jury with how bad life is for the heirs of someone who died from cancer. Of course in reality science gives probabilities not absolutes and so the jury gets told this causes cancer in .0001% of cases but this person was that one even though there is no way to determine that and cancer has many different causes. What matters is what you can convince a jury who doesn't have a background in science or statistics.
It run out of steam around Snowleopard time frame.
I've been promoted up to CTO as a former developer (CTO of some big companies now!) and I feel I'm a pretty mediocre CTO compared to my dev performance. I can attest to this principle :)
Not that I'm arguing for or against preventing access from AI crawlers, but wouldn't it make more sense to block them at a higher level, e.g. the webserver, and not even give them the choice to obey/disobey robots.txt?
A good QA’s creativity in finding new ways to break my code knows no bounds.
Those who benefit from the company exist would invest in it: state, employees, clients.
I can't wait for it to be sold out, or only being sold at shops that wan't like 40$ for international shipping...
Meta can choose not to operate in the environment. It won't, though. Showing ads (not personalized) still yields them a profit in EEA market.

And under GDPR we have a specific definition of consent. Your liberatarian dilusions are not the terms of the discourse.

(32) "Consent should be given by a clear affirmative act establishing a freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous indication of the data subject's agreement to the processing of personal data relating to him or her, such as by a written statement, including by electronic means, or an oral statement."

Many commentators challenge the notion of a user being able to consent to such processing, since Facebook has monopolistic power in the marketplace ensured by network effects. It is then impossible for a user to give a "freely given" consent. The same way an employee cannot consent to the employer's processing of his or her data.

There is also a question of whether the consent Facebook asks for is specific. It really is not, if you've seen the intimidating choice screen forcing users to act (which itself is likely illegal under EU consumer rights protection). The choice screen also uses Facebook's primary color (blue) for nudging the user to consent. This also infringes on the "freely given" aspect, by using dark patterns.
Why not use batteries and get twice the efficiency?
A friend was at some sort of marketing conference when the logo redesign happened. They commented to a colleague that it looked like the logo redesign had just happened on a whim. Someone working for Pepsi marketing happened to overhear them and replied that that's exactly what had happened.