skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Well that’s not really true. It’s not like cash is deanonynising because of the serial numbers. You can still get stamps on a grey market or send someone else to get them for you, and I’m sure they’re sold in lots of places that don’t have CCTV. The postmark would always have identified the approximate source location, it’s just a bit more precise now.
Nim as a language is a good place to go. The ecosystem is another story entirely. I suggest you search for the kinds of libraries you'd need and check their maintenance status, maybe do some example project to get a feel for the compiler and `nimble`.
I'd be worried about what happens when the steam locomotive is complete and perfect in every way.
Maybe more like the Magic Leap, it exists but isn't what was promised.
Yeah, it feels like this pattern of “ship an open source product, get popular, try to backtrack” ignores the fact that the only reason you got popular in the first place was the open source aspect.

Would anyone have given mongo a look if it was a fully proprietary technology? They would have gone bust years ago.
Is there any other definition of consciousness than one of a subjective experience that observes and reacts to its environment?
It’s nonsense. When I was broke in college I had to take an ambulance, the cost was $800. I called the payment center and told them I had no insurance and it was reduced to $100. This was a large hospital in a major American city.
> Have two thousand strings which all need the same edits? No need to do a find/replace operation, you can do it directly in the editor.

I might be missing something here, but how is making 2000 individual selections better than `:%s/oldstring/newstring/g`?

I'm guessing that you have a rule for setting up those 2000 selection, or something?

I mean, even for like 5 identical edits, the regex is going to be faster, so you must have a short way of performing the multi-selection.
What I am missing in cockpit, is a way to manage user services. Like a webinterface for
"systemctl --user status" etc.
Try putting the CN22 on the back instead.
> why lack of your prompt would make a difference

Not lack of prompt. Air gap between Edgar and everything else.

> reverting climate change gives Edgar just as much opportunity to sabotage

Yes. And you shouldn't do that with Edgar either.

> why do you think someone else would not write a worse prompt?

That's not the question we are asked. We can only decide on this one instance. If the question was "should we destroy Edgar" the answer is "yes".

> in real life to build and use such a swarm you would need trillions of people and AI agents, living on several planets and many space stations

It wouldn't matter, the problem wasn't an accident, it was Edgar killing humanity and making his crabs on purpose.
You're omitting one tiny detail: we just have to build that at scales never attempted before.

Also, omitting the tiny detail of how complex it is to store hydrogen which you assume is the way to store energy.
> Science fiction is hard to do now.

You may want to check books in the Culture universe by Ian M. Banks, Alastair Reynolds' House or Sun or the Commonwealth universe from Peter F. Hamilton (which also as a fantasy like arc). Not sure we're getting humans meshing into spacetime soon.
What makes you think this is not the case? According to the article this disaster was within the parameters the the insurers planned for, even though it is the biggest of its kind.
Right, now count in contributions from other cloud providers: tensent, huawei, alibaba and you'll find out that they contributed much more, than actual redis-employed developers
FTX.US was very much a thing, and despite SBF's promises to regulators and others that it was completely separate, it imploded along with the rest.
But commenters here want that right? They're rilling up against an API that allows data export and user ownership and demand that they're removed and all interoperability to be killed because "users are too stupid". This cements and entrenches monopolies because noone is allowed to compete or interoperate.

In sense, things like Apple Mail is a problem for them because it uses full access to GMail account to extract private data over API.
The only career where you are concerned about if someone is conscious is boxing.
> OpenSearch infuriates me to no end.

> Even basic things like autocompleting queries have been WIP for half a decade now.

It's an open-source project. If this bothered you for half a decade, you could always submit a patch.

Apparently it didn't bother enough other people that no one cared to send a patch.
That’s strange. If I invest my money into any form of securities it’s pretty clear to me that the value of that capital might go to zero overnight.

If I invested it in crypto? I would value it at zero for the rest of eternity.
"But I've always been curious whether NetBSD would offer any advantages here, or a different kind of flexibility (and it also has excellent documentation)."

I may be wrong on this as I have not kept up, but in the past the Linux kernel did not support the multiboot protocol. Whereas NetBSD kernel supports it. For example, I have booted NetBSD kernels using a FreeBSD bootloader. I wanted to be able to boot either NetBSD or FreedBSD kernels from the same USB stick. I liked to put multiple NetBSD kernels on the same stick and wondered about other OS kernels. This was before the container craze.

I think Linux will always be able to boot significantly faster. Although I have never considered NetBSD to boot "slowly". I think using NetBSD is really a matter of personal taste. "Advantages" are subjective. It does have _differences_ when compared to Linux. A coherent userland is obviously one. There are of course fewer cooks in the kitchen. And it is easier to track its development. There is sometimes interesting work like RUMP that was IMHO ahead of its time. There is the notion of "off by default", i.e., the project generally does not assume that the user wants or does not want something enabled/installed. (At least not traditionally.) It is up to the user to prepare and configure their own system. A benefit of this is that it can sometimes help with learning how NetBSD works. IME, Linux is generally quite different. Convenience is always a focus. Assumptions about users' wants and needs are the norm. Learning is generally not a goal.

Linux is obviously a very, very large community. NetBSD is relatively small.

When I look at the pre-packaged options for building custom Linux kernels and userlands, e.g., Buildroot, Yocto, etc., they seem far more complicated to me than using the NetBSD source tree. But I am probably biased.
Putting myself in the shoes of a short seller, I would be concerned that this could be read as, yes management is inflating the measure that determines their bonuses, but this says nothing about the success of the business itself.

While AFFO (a non-GAAP measure) may be inflated, it hasn't grown faster than the relevant GAAP measures. In fact, net income has almost doubled since 2021 while AFFO has only grown 23%. Revenue growth has been 23% as well.

None of this is wildly inconsistent. The only thing that really stands out is the sudden drop in maintenance CapEx in 2015.

They do highlight some other things about the data center market that may be relevant to the share price, but this seems far less damning than the AFFO issue.
Yep, that's exactly it. Of course it makes sense: making requires several orders of magnitude more effort than using. But if a project changes/goes down, the community often just moves elsewhere, nothing major lost from their perspective.

And I think Open Source is based on the very few who decide to take it upon themselves to be the ones spearheading a specific project/task and share it with everyone else. Maybe it's not every single time me, sometimes it's you, sometimes it's Lucy or Mark, and that's how the roll keeps rolling for everyone.

So if a project goes down and nobody comes up to replace it, either it wasn't worth much or this is the time nobody took it upon themselves to do it (yet).
A few years ago several Services across the Internet stopped working, among them with Spotify. I was a Spotify user and had a premium subscription.

It was revealed that these crashes were due to these apps loading in a JavaScript file from Facebook.

Everyone thought I was crazy when I canceled Spotify later that week and stopped using every single affected app moving forward, because I don't trust Facebook.

They have their tendril in everything
I disagreed with your opinion, I didn't attack you. I don't know the first thing about you.
Why would it be terrified? It doesn't have an amygdala.
It's not that different from having the same user/password accessible via ssh. It's best to not have direct access to important machines anyway, and go for a bastion or similar service.

But... you can switch to Kerberos SSO, or setup smart cards login instead.

You can also use it kind of like a jump host and do ssh keys I to secondary server.

I find it cool to give nice way to access in environments where ssh is not allowed by default, but https is. It's sometimes easier to setup proxies/reverse proxies in corporate forest instead of opting for direct ash access.
Article does mention it
Easter egg hidden in Chrome DevTools
Speculating but I think a production line has a rigid synchronized speed. If a step suddenly takes more time everything else must wait.

Imagine a queue of people at a buffet where overtaking is not allowed. If someone dawdles around at the juicer, people behind them need to wait while the salad bar is emptying and suddenly the cashier has nothing to do.
Huh, interesting...oh wait, bazel. closes tab
Remember that this site is full of people outeight supporting monopolies and walled gardens when it comes to companies they like. So yes, they're absolutely defending removal of APIs that allow data sharing with explicit user consent.
Yeah, it is incredible how the whole free software movement turned into a bunch of entitled folks that want to be paid for their work, while refusing to put down any penny for the folks that make their tooling possible in first place.

At the same time big corps use it as carte blanche to basically pirate software in a legal way, while following the letter of the licence.

Going back to the open core/demo versions (aka Shareware/Public Domain/Trials) is the only sustainable way to make a living.
You can build that into a neural net by training with dropout, but I don't know if it's still fashionable.
I am one of the Arraymancer contributors. I believe that what mratsim (Arraymancer’s creator) has done is pretty amazing but I agree that the scope is a quite ambitious. There’s been some talk about separating the deep learning bits into its own library (which I expect would be done in a backwards compatible way). Recently we worked on adding FFT support but instead of adding it to Arraymancer it was added to “impulse” (https://github.com/SciNim/impulse) which is a separate, signal processing focused library. There is also Vindaar’s datamancer (a pandas like dataframe library) and ggplotnim (a plotting library inspired by R’s ggplot). The combination of all of these libraries makes nim a very compelling language for signal processing, data science and ML.

Personally I’d like Arraymancer to be a great tensor library (basically a very good and ideally faster alternative to numpy and base Matlab). Frankly I think that it’s nearly there already. I’ve been using Arraymancer to port a 5G physical layer simulator from Matlab to nim and it’s been a joy. It’s not perfect by any means but it’s already very good. And given how fast nim’s scientific ecosystem keeps improving it will only get much better.
Was about to say the same. I guess the most of recent engineering in Boeing is just scaling, I mean, making it bigger without changing anything else, if you can call that engineering by any chance...
But when you see that currently Redis is mainly developed by Chinese companies or AWS all of this is rather ironic.
> It’s early. Everyone is confused.

No, it is not, it is decades in, in a well-understood area. Some VC-backed firms (and the VC’s backing them, who see this as critical beyond the immediate firms) want to trade on the idea and popularity of open source without its substance because open source as has has been known for decades is not a viable foundation for the kind of business model that they would like, but has at the same time secured the kind of mindshare in the market that makes it difficult for proprietary software to achieve the kind of rapid ramp-up that provides the timing and combination of returns they want. So they’ve decided to spend a lot of effort making everyone feel confused at some ginned up new threat to open-source, which is not a threat to open source, not something that open source community hasn’t known about for decades, but just a problem for a bait-and-switch business model in which software gains traction trading on the cachet of open source and then rakes in monopoly rents that avoiding is one of the benefits to users of open source licensing.

They want users to see them like Postgres, but they want to milk users like Oracle. That’s the problem – a marketing problem for proprietary software vendors. The attempt to sell confusion is an attempt to conceal that that is all the problem is.
Chill, I guess?
The technical jargon sounds stylistically a lot more made up and playful than the one you suggested.
When did HN become so unbearably stuck-up?
Biden administration unveils new rules for federal government's use of AI
It's not AGPL, but LGPL-3.0-only. Neither of these licenses is "hostile".

And ftr, in my eyes, a project being created/initiated by ddevault is an asset, certainly not a liability.
It's a little odd that you've changed the topic from stealing food to survive, to stealing someone's bicycle (regardless of your halfhearted comment about the possibility that they stole your bike so they can go buy bread... which... what?).

If someone needs to steal something (anything) in order to survive (an actually survival need), hopefully they will be able to do so in a way that doesn't cause a bystander the kind of difficulty you're talking about. Like they could steal the bicycle from a bike shop instead of a person's home.

But ultimately, if it's actually a survival need, I hope if push came to shove, I wouldn't put my psychological well-being (something that, when hurt, can be healed) above someone else's life (something that, when lost, cannot be returned).
It's also visible for users with CSS overrides and/or other browser inpairments. The more I think about it the more strongly I prefer the "type 42" explicit input field.
> A Reddit post incorrectly took portions of our Terms of Service out of context, which only pertain to content provided to Vultr on our public mediums (community-related content on public forums, as an example) for purposes of rendering the needed services – e.g., publishing comments, posts, or ratings. This is separate from a user’s own, private content that is deployed on Vultr services.

> In order to simplify and further clarify our ToS, we are removing the following sentence from Section 12.1(a) of our ToS

https://www.vultr.com/news/A-Note-About-Vultrs-Terms-of-Serv...
“Viral” just means that the license has a “no additional restrictions” clause, not that you can’t make a commercial offering out of it. That’s why GPL and AGPL don’t really solve the problem.

And the problem with the trademark model is that AWS, and especially Microsoft, already have established brand recognition with the people who sign the big SaaS and support contracts. The people who know what a Redis is are just nerds with no money, the real big shots do everything in Microsoft Excel.
You could, but I don’t think that’s the goal of most muggers.
Yep still the biggest leachers. Token hires and flowery PR campaigns doesn't entitle them to most of the profits of other vendors products or absolve them of their predatory behavior.

But they wont be able to leech Redis's future contributions. Knowing AWS they'll most likely create a fork to continue raking in most of the profits in the short-term.
This doesn't make sense. In the case of humans and animals, consciousness is a way to adapt to the environment to protect their lives, fulfill their needs and eventually reproduce. Consciousness is useful for life. But in the case of the sun, what is it adapting to, and what does it have to protect? Nothing.

The fact that consciousness appears always in populations might be essential. Consciousness was the result of self-replicator evolving to deal with limited resources. In the case of the sun, it is too far away and interacts very little with other celestial bodies, there can be no evolution for suns, they don't iterate fast enough and don't transmit their data into the future like DNA.
Correlated recent video from Climate Town: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2oL4SFwkkw
I think this misses the point. It’s not that the government doesn’t have the resources or the capability, and we just need to step up and help. They do. They can and do buy cell phone location data, ad tech data, and all other sorts of bespoke data like car tire pressure unique IDs. All of this created by well-paid Silicon Valley companies and aggregated by no-name government contracting companies like Anomaly 6, VenTel and Babel Street. The reason it’s not put to better use is that the US can’t figure out whether we have a right to privacy (in which case the government needs to knock it off) or whether we should prefer safety.
Definitely. Nim is a great language and coming from Python it might be the easiest compiled language for you to get into.
To be fair to vultures, they are majestic creatures who serve an important part in many ecosystems and they are some of the most endangered birds (often due to habitat loss and/or persecution, poisoning).

They should not be seen as negative (as owls and crows are in many cultures) but as the nature cleaners that they are.

/end-of-rant but I love vultures :D
It is if the thing they bought had contributions from many other people but pretty much all of them got nothing for it.
What is a subjective experience? To me, this seems like an infinite regress problem.
Get ready to embark on an extraordinary journey with Nextpart AI as we introduce the groundbreaking NSFW Character AI, a game-changing revolution in the world of digital interactions. Nextpart AI reshapes the very concept of desire and connection, ushering in a bold new era filled with endless possibilities.
Join us on this exhilarating ride where limitations vanish, and the digital realm evolves into an immersive universe of unexplored passions and unparalleled connections. Welcome to Nextpart AI, where the ordinary transforms into something extraordinary, and your desire knows no bounds.

Discover NSFW Character AI on Nextpart AI
Discover the groundbreaking NSFW Character AI by Nextpart AI, a game-changing tool for immersive and personalized NSFW character chats. With limitless chatbot characters and support for multiple languages, users can shape character traits through brief text inputs and refine behavior through interactive feedback.
Dive into a world of creativity with advanced creation options, engaging in customized NSFW conversations within your own world. Nextpart AI’s NSFW Character AI sets a new standard for conversational AI, offering freedom of expression, tailored experiences, and the removal of content filters. Delve into its innovative features and cutting-edge technology for a one-of-a-kind, boundary-pushing interaction.
They dont't want AWS royalties. They wanna be able to command higher margins. Since AWS has lower costs and prices, Redis can't compete with good margins. The royalties are just a way to increase AWS costs, so that they raise their prices and give Redis the ability to keep high prices and margins, while still remaining attractive to customers (which don't have a cheaper choice anymore).
FAQs: NSFW AI Art Generator
Q4: What is the best NSFW AI art generator?
The best NSFW AI art generator can vary based on individual preferences and requirements, but some popular options include:

SoulGen.ai: SoulGen is known for creating realistic and detailed NSFW images using a deep learning system. It offers a large library of NSFW content, including photographs of people, anime, and mythical creatures. This generator allows users to generate both realistic and anime pictures with high accuracy and is user-friendly for artists and designers of all levels.
Unstable Diffusion: Unstable Diffusion utilizes the Style GAN technique to generate NSFW images that are both realistic and unique. It is recognized for creating abstract and surreal NSFW visuals that capture viewers’ interest. Users can customize the generator’s output to match their preferences by adjusting various factors.
PornX: PornX is another notable NSFW AI art generator that focuses on creating challenging and thought-provoking NSFW content, particularly in the anime art style. It offers high-quality images that are visually appealing and emotionally resonant, making it a valuable tool for artists exploring NSFW themes.
While these are some of the top NSFW AI art generators, the best choice ultimately depends on the specific needs and preferences of the user, considering factors like image quality, customization options, ease of use, and pricing.
Never did, maybe never will. They make it harder for devs to port to their minority market with the move to axe Vulkan and then sqaunder back with MoltenVK porting tools years later trying to get devs back in. They want f2p levels of money but then go on to make a subscrition service with no other way to monetize it. From a financial and creative perspective, their strategies don't make sense.

They should just keep their easy cut of the genshin et. al. on the app store and let whoever else is interested in hosting premium games do their job. If they get their way they are getting a cut of alternate stores anyway.
Yes, they paid. And they can use the code they paid for. But it doesn't give them right to leech of any future code written by someone else IN THE FUTURE.
Love the Greg Lemond's citation!
> Space in academic journals is too precious to waste on inessential content

Not the biggest issue in maths - the arxiv version usually won't match the journal version 1:1
Sounds like Boeing has had a lot of what is often taught in business schools as goal subordination in organizational behavior.

Yup, these topics explain that some managers can feel threatened by especially competent subordinates.
Short answer: if you want to execute a program (maybe with some instrumentation, for fuzzing purposes) it's much easier to adopt a dynamic approach (i.e., emulation or virtualization). With static binary translation you can get better performance, but there's a lot of other things you need to get 100% right and that with a dynamic approach are a given (e.g., the CFG).

There's much more space of improvement in the field of analyzing code (as opposed to running it), so we're investing our energies there.

Then we're strong believers in integrating dynamic and static information, for instance see PageBuster: https://rev.ng/blog/pagebuster

But other than that, static binary translation is a feature of rev.ng in maintenance mode.
Is it inside the (stunning) Barranco de Masca?
I loved it
Uh, yes. They should have. One of the whole shticks of this whole thing is that the money transfers anonymously. Once you are gifting someone money with a credit card for some numbers in a database under their control? In the ** bahamas?
It does exists, though you can only manage services from the user that you login with afaik.