skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't think this really tracks.

> With a violent mugging encounter, you are blameless

I was mugged a decade or so ago, and while I was certainly angry with the people who mugged me, I also punished myself a bit: I shouldn't have been walking down that particular street at 2am; I'd had a bit to drink and should have called a car. Or I should have been paying more attention to my surroundings; maybe I would have seen them early enough to get away, etc.

The point isn't whether or not the thoughts I had were rational. I don't think the type of crime matters; victims always have plenty of room to assign some blame to themselves, or at least second-guess their actions.
The point is, that if you want it to happen, you can do it with just minor effort.
How did you go from

"It lacks so many improvements and advancements since the ancient version it was forked at"

to "opensearch is some kind of unsafe abandonware"?

Would love to learn the thought process here.
Don't forget it's dependencies like the Linux kernel developers or GCC etc.
To be fair, Mongodb’s pr team did their best to present it as the solution to all problems.

> In 2012, 10gen’s VP of Corporate Strategy Matt Asay argued “there will remain a relatively small sphere of applications unsuitable for MongoDB … the majority of application software that developers write will be in use cases that are better fits for MongoDB and other NoSQL technology … Those functions that really help a company innovate and grow revenue [will be NoSQL].” He would note that we were living in the post-transactional future.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15124306
Pizza places are also one of the few places in Europe where the portion is often too large.

Otherwise I think the rare occasion where someone requests it is when a younger child has hardly touched their meal.
And it's even more sad just how much flagrant discrimination has come back in full force in just the past decade.

Sincere "What the hell is wrong with you." to him.
If someone can come up with a voice clinging product that I can run on my own computer not the cloud, and if it’s super simple to install and use, then I’ll pay.

I find it hard to understand why so much money is going into ai and so many startups are building ai stuff and such a product does not exist.

It’s got to run locally because I’m not interested in the restrictions that cloud voice cloning services impose.

Complete, consumer level local voice cloning = payment.
Considering what the financial condition of Xerox would have been if they had kept on them, am sorry, but it is a facepalm.
Sounds like you’ve no actual clue of the history of FPÖ.
At my local depot they allow you to see what the item is before you decide to pay or not.
Zora is nice, written in Rust so there's really no setup compared to the Ruby gems mess that is Jekyll.
Seems to be a chicken-with-its-head-cut-off outrage day on HN today. There's tons of other places to spend your outrage, especially since their blog post is right, my first reading of the passage in question ending in "for the purposes of delivering the Service to you" was enough to understand it was a limited license.

I mean hey, could it be more clear and more ironclad that they aren't trying to steal your content? Yeah. But this is a customer service complaint, not a sensational news story.
Wikipedia explicitly says:

Post Office Limited

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from Post Office Ltd)

Not to be confused with Royal Mail.
Multi-cursor is more flexible than rectangular selection. You can skip or delete words of varying length etc. It is certainly less powerful than vim macro and regex, but it's easy to use because
1) there are less shortcuts to remember
2) no need to think too much like figuring out regex for simple tasks
3) it gives instant feedback

Video showing this
https://youtu.be/lhFNWTAIzOI?t=28
> The human anxiety about animal suffering needs arguments to support it

You want arguments supporting that humans dislike seeing animals suffer? To most people that would be obvious, I'm not sure what to say.
OAuth 2.0 is perfectly fine for privilege management. The problem is they granted read access when all Netflix needed here was write access.

An analogy would be granting full access to a Gmail inbox in order to merely send an email. It would not require “scope explosion” to isolate the email sending permission. That’s just one OAuth scope. They just didn’t isolate it.

The more interesting question here is how this interacts with supposed end-to-end encryption. Clearly the messages Netflix sends cannot be E2EE (right?). The whole point of E2EE is the service provider doesn’t have your keys. If Facebook is letting 3P send messages on your behalf, they must be unencrypted.

Normally, ideally, in an E2EE system this should set off alarm bells. If you get a message from someone that’s not actually signed/encrypted by them, this should be very clearly alerted. Otherwise it’s a privacy attack vector. You could be downgraded to an unencrypted channel without your awareness.

So, what’s the Facebook messenger user experience here?
A sidecar type design is literally just exposing the bus, and yes, it rejected exposing the bus externally over "just" providing a variety of cases to take cards internally. On the Amiga, it was literally exposing the raw CPU bus.

Most of the 1980's sidecar designs existed to provide options at a point where they were competing at price points and in market segments where that was not viable. At the same time the price points for peripherals made the extra plastic a rounding error at that point in time. I think most of these designs failed largely because the moment you got people thinking about how many extra things they might assemble to get what they want, they'd look for a machine that provides more of that out of the box instead.

Having a sidecar felt like an "escape hatch" so you didn't feel locked in when buying a fairly basic machine. If you think there's even a possibility you might need 3+, you'd be looking at a big box machine from the start.
Most Redis users don't really do scripting though. If Microsoft manages to replace Redis for most use cases they will succeed.
I agree, I didn't make any argument against that, I just don't see the difference between <party with money that bought a name and sells the free work of others> and <party with money that didn't buy a name and sells the free work of others>. My only argument here is that there's not much difference between AWS and Garantia Data from my limited understanding of the situation.
Curious what you do when you encounter an instruction you don't model
Loosely relevant, “the marketing behind mongodb”

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15124306
Oh I really like those comments. People think that keeping autoupgrades on without control keeps them secure. Right... And then you keep hearing stories about server wont go up because of update, or stuff breaks horribly. Not to mention brining new bugs to the table.

Its not that simple. I care what I install on my servers. Everything is carefully selected. Additionally, I follow KISS concept, so I run simple things that are managable.
But that's the entry point. Well written textbooks, which discuss the right problem are invaluable. If you head straight to google scholar, you're going to have a bad time.
I've seen him give a talk. He continues to persist with pseudo-scientific theories that posit forces for which there are no evidence that purport to explain phenomenon that we have completely adequate scientific explanations for. His theories routinely fail Occam's razor, his experimental design is garbage, and he is never skeptical of his own conclusions. He's a kook.
The problem is too many people are announcing OSS forks so it’s hard to align development efforts and users are confused. No one’s begging Redis Labs (which didn’t create Redis in the first place and only took over the brand with VC money when it was already popular) or whatever they’re called now to keep the bug fixes rolling. They only account for 20-50% of recent development anyway (50% if you attribute all “unknown” contributors to them), with the other 50% from (predominantly Chinese) cloud companies allegedly “pirating” their software, according to some.

I don’t typically ask people to RTFA because that’s against the rules, but you would have known all of the above if you bothered to read the article.
Yes it is. Asking your waiter to wrap up the rest of your food to go almost never happens in the UK.

Maybe this is creeping in due to seeing Americans doing this in movies. You start to realise how people cope with those huge portions sizes in the US. Many people don't eat everything in one sitting.

It's hard to explain why we don't do it in the UK. We generally assume that packaging is not free so therefore wouldn't expect someone to give free takeaway boxes. Also, like almost everything cultural in the UK, I expect it is rooted in class snobbery. If you need to take away, maybe this indicates that you're poor and need to make a meal last. These aren't conscious prejudices, they're relics of the past and subconscious.
It seems that there is a firmware doing SSB (I don't understand if it's real SSB or something emulated).
Anyway, the radio chip of UV-K5 is able to manage distinct I-Q signal, so it just a matter of implementing SSB via software.
Yeah, that's a great idea for sure!
GitHub doesn't exactly seem to have a particularly good way to share lots of screenshots, but here's a few over at Hackaday.

https://hackaday.io/project/25370/gallery#88828d4dd7e62feb95...

The Wiki in general is a new addition to the project, as part of the general transition from mostly an internal tool to a document product, so there's definitely lots of room to improve.
The only other fork from current redis that I'm aware of is Redict, and I'd imagine drew devault's name alone brings enough baggage and bad memories that a lot of people (users and contributors) will avoid it.

This fork being run by existing contributors to the project helps a lot too.
In case the phrasing of the reply you're talking about doesn't clue the reader in to the fact that it's a sorry attempt at bait, if you look at the (three) replies on the account that made that post, one of them pings like a hundred people with a GIF of a kitten captioned with the N-word.
This doesn't seem to be true though. In the Terms of Service[1], "User Content" is defined as this in 12.a:

> (a) You are responsible for the information, text, opinions, messages, comments, audio visual works, motion pictures, photographs, animation, videos, graphics, sounds, music, software, Apps, and any other content or material that You or your end users submit, upload, post, host, store, or otherwise make available (“Make Available”) on or through the Services (collectively, “Your Content,” “Content” or “User Content”)

What is the "Services" then? It's explained here (first paragraph[1]):

> The Terms explain how you are permitted to use the services provided by and through our platform and website(s) (main url located at www.vultr.com) as well as all of our associated internet and online properties [...] Collectively, the Site, the Materials, and the services provided therein are referred to as the “Services”.

Is a website I host in Vultr an "associated online property"? When I upload or modify some of my website content through vultr.com, does it become User Content? This is very over-reaching on purpose (as most legalese tends to be) but not in a good way, I wouldn't want to have to go to court to prove that their non-binding blog post is correct and the binding legal terms are incorrect, neither should I nor anyone.

[1] https://www.vultr.com/legal/tos/
"Betrayed"? This is so sensational for what amounts to a misunderstanding of a sentence in legal terms that is just long enough for customers (well, Reddit at least) to lose the context. But not for a court, "for purposes of providing the Services to you" is an important part that you shouldn't gloss over just because it's at the end of the sentence.

"Just"? A blog post written this week for terms that have been there since 2021?
I thought Mastodon was supposed to be a better Twitter because of all of the federation and everything.
This is clearly false. "He did it in the parking lot" is nothing like enough evidence to convict anyone. It isn't remotely enough even on the balance of probabilities. I have seen zero evidence for the conspiracy theory, and strong evidence against it, including the fact that his own family think his death was suicide.

Please do not casually spread conspiracy theories. They poison democratic debate, make us all stupider, and distract attention from important, evidenced realities, like the others mentioned in the article.
I'm not familiar with it, can you elaborate why it's controversial?
The best math book I've ever read -- which I think can completely transform somebody's appreciation of math -- was William Dunham's "Journey Through Genius - The Great Theorems of Mathematics."

What this book did was place mathematics in human and historical context. It starts with Hippocrates' Quadrature of the Lune, then moves on to Euclid's proof of the Pythagorean theorem, and moves along through history all the way down to Euler and Cantor.

I've always thought that the book's format or method is the best way to teach mathematics in a general sense. It beats the rote practice of formulae out of context, and it simultaneously teaches the history of mathematics and science. I'm always gifting parents of school-age children copies of this book.
Funnily enough, the one feature I don't recommend in Postgres is Cascade. Unless you have a very small controlled set of FK it's not a good idea. Batch delete is less problematic. I wish Postgres would do something about it, like elasticsearch deleteByQuery that can run in the background.
> If you ascertain some value to the permissionless and self-custodial value of cash. And you see value in the internet's ability to connect the entire world. Then it follows immediately that you see value in cryptocurrency.

Those two separate sentences do not immediately team up to somehow lead to the third sentence.

> After all, most of HN audience lives in developed democratic countries where personal freedoms are considered fundamental pillars and protected.

As do most crypto proponents who imagine the world outside the "enlightened West" as barbaric lawless lands governed by roaming bands Mad Max-style.

Even though than we can take a popular online service that people pay for and see in which countries it's available. For example, Spotify says it's available in 238 countries and territories: https://support.spotify.com/us/article/where-spotify-is-avai.... It does not accept any form of crypto currency as payment. This means that people in these countries have enough financial institutions and methods, and enough security to be able to pay for an international music streaming service [1].

> Maybe one day they will tell you in what you can or cannot spend your money or where you can invest it and how much.

Or some day the Mad Max-style roaming gang will break down your door and steal all your cash. Or break all your fingers until you give them access to all your wallets.

[1] The number of ways people pay in various countries is staggering. See e.g. what Adyen (the payment integrator that companies like Spotify, Uber, eBay etc. use) has integrated with: https://docs.adyen.com/payment-methods/ and https://docs.adyen.com/unified-commerce/pay-by-link/supporte... and https://docs.adyen.com/point-of-sale/what-we-support/payment...

The complete willful ignorance and obliviousness that the absolute various majority of crypto proponents exhibit is no less staggering.
Here is the list of nginx contributors sorted by number of commits before nginx's team split in 2022:

$ hg log -b default | grep ^user: | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr | head

3683 user: Igor Sysoev <igor@sysoev.ru>

1681 user: Maxim Dounin <mdounin@mdounin.ru>

630 user: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@nginx.com>

413 user: Valentin Bartenev <vbart@nginx.com>

226 user: Roman Arutyunyan <arut@nginx.com>

209 user: Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@nginx.com>

120 user: Vladimir Homutov <vl@nginx.com>

45 user: Piotr Sikora <piotr@cloudflare.com>

40 user: Piotr Sikora <piotrsikora@google.com>

32 user: Dmitry Volyntsev <xeioex@nginx.com>

Source: https://hg.nginx.org/nginx/

Valentin, Ruslan and Vladimir currently are working on Angie.

Igor actually doesn't contribute to nginx since 2012... there are only few small commits after these dates, most of his contributions are between 2002 and 2012.

Maxim now works on freenginx alone. And here is a response from an Angie developer about consolidation with freenginx: https://github.com/webserver-llc/angie/issues/74 - why it won't happen.
I have it on deep background that Hindenburg executives leave the toilet roll empty and dont return shopping carts
> It is important to note we did not include clinically diagnosed autistic participants

Nothing about us without us.
What assurance is that?
For a use case that straightforward isn’t the simplest SSG going to be:

cat header.html body.html footer.html > page.html

??
I mean I love redis, but Amazon Google and Microsoft all probably have readily available in memory key/value stores at hand. Throw a little money and they can make it redis compatible, so we wouldn't have to re-write any code.

Redis is great as an off-the shelf component, but it's not exactly rocket science to re-implement for a big corporation. So redis doesn't really have any leverage in my opinion.
Regarding "unbanked" people who are "anywhere in the world" but have " their smartphone": Cryptocurrency is not only the wrong product, but also in this case a future functionality would be the wrong time. The market gap for that has closed already due to better systems including M-PESA
As I mentioned here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39857944

The consistently ignorant rhetoric here on HN about this supposedly unserved market for cryptocurrency is discouraging. Again, people need to look outside of the USA to understand the state of the art.
What you’re describing isn’t a problem. Why does it matter if there are too many forks? Development also doesn’t need to be aligned to begin with.

It’s like complaining that there are too many implementations on GitHub of the same thing.
Stories without conflict are boring. Utopias have very little conflict, so it’s pretty boring to read or write about them.
No,they want to make money with software they did not build. The Redis company did not build Redis nor are they the biggest contributor.
That's unlikely, since we use QEMU as a lifter, which sometimes supports new instructions before they hit silicon.

However, I think we'll emit a call to some `noreturn` function. Basically we emit a call to `abort`.
I really dislike the term "victim blaming", as too often it's used to shut down rational discussion about the facts of what happened. Not saying that's what you're trying to do here, but...

Often a victim of a crime could have taken different actions that would have prevented their victimization. That doesn't necessarily make it their fault, or even assign some portion of the blame to them. It's just a fact of circumstance.

A decade or so ago I was mugged by three men while walking home from a bar on a deserted, poorly-lit stretch of street at 2am on a Tuesday morning. It wasn't my fault that it happened, but I could have made other -- better -- choices leading up to that which would have prevented it from happening to me. We can argue whether or not it would have been reasonable to expect me to make those better decisions given my circumstances before getting mugged, but those are still the facts on the ground. I did not need to be walking home; I could have called a car or taken a bus instead. I did not need to be there, at that time, with my judgment, reaction time, and situational awareness impaired. This is about outcomes, not blame.

If I were looking to make some money and had a choice between buying conventional stocks or buying crypto, I'd hopefully consider the risks beforehand. By now I think it's fair to assume that most people who might buy crypto should have heard about a variety of scams, fraud, and outright theft that have occurred in the crypto space. All other things being equal (they're not, but let's say they are), a decision to buy stocks vs. crypto should take into account the expectation that there's a higher risk of losing the money to a scam when buying crypto. Again, that doesn't make it the crypto-buyer's fault when the person/company holding the crypto wallet for them steals it. But it's true that the crypto-buyer could have made different -- better -- decisions up front to avoid the possibility of that outcome.
Great-grandparents? The window for grandparents might be closing! If you have your kids at 35, and your kids have their kids 35, you are 75 by the time the grandchild turns 5. The amount of quality time you might have to spend with your grandchild could be approximately zero (depends of course on your health).
Farcaster is doing it (allowing posting, upvoting etc) with a pragmatic architecture with different degrees of decentralization (identity onchain, posts on a p2p storage à la bittorrent), and it's going pretty fine... https://warpcast.com/
Postcrossing maintains a list of international postcard costs by country. Going by cheapest for food, the US is #20, UK is about #100. Bahamas is the cheapest.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1leBjOXKNneuPVZt2PRnI...
Seems exciting. I'm keen to try the fully standalone version. Is there any news about tentative pricing? Hopefully its affordable enough for hobbyist as well.
No, people cannot always. Sometimes, often maybe, yes.

Network effect, security, are some of the reasons.
> dwarfed by the 350M investment in Redis Labs

It’s funny that you would use commits to quantify investment from AWS, but you’d use $ to buy shares in future profits to quantify investment from redis labs. Why not use the same yardstick for both?

Either way, it doesn’t matter. Not one bit. Everyone who put in effort into redis did it knowing the license. There’s nothing wrong in relicensing future commits. There’s nothing wrong with forking. There’s nothing wrong in using whichever fork works better for you.

You’re insisting up and down that AWS and others were leeching because they didn’t own the copyright to redis. I’ve never heard this interpretation of OSS before, but sure maybe you’re right. But we’ll see which fork comes out on top a year from now.
There are definitely bitcoin diehards out there who look at the price of everything relative to bitcoin.

From a practical standpoint, I think most people would prefer it if the currency used by their country of residence increased in value relative to other global currencies, rather than just staying stable (though for hyperinflationary countries, even that would be a major improvement).

Although stability relative to another currency (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixed_exchange_rate_system) is considered (by many) disadvantageous for countries with strong economies, because you strip away the central bank's power to manage the supply. This is basically the whole Gold Standard debate.

For blockchain users who want reduced volatility and stability relative to a fiat currency, there are always stablecoins.
Ouch, RIP. I didn't know anything about this guy, but now I feel like I should attempt some kind of code contribution to Postgres in his memory.
PicBankAI – Search and Explore AI Generated Images by Prompt
A hosting provider suddenly gave themselves a license to do anything they want with the stuff you put on their server. How is that not a betrayal? You trusted them to host your stuff without, for example, re-selling it. They broke that trust.
His contributions include:

> Point in Time Recovery, Table Partitioning, Hot Standby, Sync Replication, focuses on enterprise issues, security, performance and scalability, business intelligence and replication/high availability.