skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It should default to chronological and give users full control over what they want to see. For example, give them tools to always show by keywords, topics, authors.

It’s work. The last thing you want as a worker is to miss something important that has real money implications. For social media, it doesn’t matter. For work, it does. You’re not optimizing for engagement like social media. You’re optimizing for communication.

Do not use an algorithmic feed. Seriously.
I could not find anything similar in Linode (Akamai) TOS:

https://www.linode.com/legal/

Nor does AWS, that I could find, except with the PartyRock created apps:

https://aws.amazon.com/service-terms/
To me that is pretty much the definition of a hit piece.

Scanning through it, the allegations I spotted are:

* He is flaky and often doesn't keep appointments.
* One guy says he invited him to go camping but didn't turn up
* Apparently he may have slightly misled his ex about where he lived in private messages
* His ex says that he has anger (purely verbal) issues
* Some other people all say he has anger issues
* Some incredibly spurious allegations that he had an affair

I probably missed some. But notably, almost nowhere is there any attempt to tell Huberman's side or have any empathy for him as a human being. Hence, it's a hit piece.
That's a pretty interesting perspective given that all pieces in EC follow standard chess movements and capturing mechanisms. It's certainly a variant, which makes it more interesting imho. In the puzzle world you could refer to such a game as a chess-like.
NYC is one of the densest cities in the world... much denser than many places that use scooters. I guess because the transit is so good?
It's definitely something I need. I don't need anything really complicated. I've actually been looking for a service like this for a while. Tried Mint once, but thought it was just a bit too much.
There's a shortage
This is very real. They also give you notice before their surveillance scan.
https://aviationweek.com/aerospace/emerging-technologies/jet...

Looks more like Max10 sized. It looks like there is a small door behind the wing, which matches the location of the back end of the cabin. There’s no window in them, but they are probably depicting the aft emergency exits, given regulatory requirements that exits be on both ends of the cabin. Based on the cut away, I think the large door aft of the main door, that has no window is likely the cargo hold door. It doesn’t look like there’s a hold under the cabin. The main door appears to be extra wide, which improves the exit capacity of the door, and reduces the actual number of exits required. There’s also the option for a ventral exit, but those are pretty rare on passenger airliners.
you have no idea what "psychology" is, do you?
Ask HN: Besides Go, what languages are muti-threading "in background"?
I mean, no need to write "async/await".
My understanding is that it's about building complex neural networks that your brain can use as a backup when others fail (although that's probably a massive oversimplification).

Crosswords are too simple, they only teach you how to get better at crosswords. Learning an instrument is a whole lifestyle - you need to combine aural, verbal, proprioception, social, and so on.
Is Daniel Kahneman the only Psychologist who has received the Noble?
Thanks for the concrete feedback - OK I will make the price more visible. As for pricing/purchase, it might not necessarily make sense to students - from what I understand, they want to look for the right subject, then the teacher, before deciding to subscribe and pay.

Where should I learn about better UI/UX?
I love when <works ridiculous hours> is presented as some kind of flex. It isn’t. It is a reliable indicator of chronic mismanagement, not only of their own time, but of the time and capability of everyone else around them. Guaranteed these folks didn’t get their job on actual merits - possible perceived merits, sure, but again guaranteed that scratching the surface will reveal all kinds of nasty.

In this case - the App store is a case in point. It is a financial success despite, not because of its’ management, and the many myriad of ills that beset the App store (and have been for a very long time) clearly show this to be the case.
Rewriting an app from UIKit to SwiftUI not only eliminates storyboards but also reduces the code base. So once again: you have code plus storyboard XML vs. just code that is smaller! My jaw dropped when I first discovered this while rewriting something.

Unfortunately though SwiftUI hasn't completely matured yet. Especially if you are targeting iOS versions prior to 16, you will encounter many of SwiftUI's shortcomings. Some (many?) UI components are still UIKit under the hood, scroll view and its derivatives are still not as flexible as you sometimes want them to be etc. For some custom UI tricks that would be a piece of cake in UIKit are impossible in SwiftUI and you often resort to wrapping the old components in your custom ones.

Oh and don't get me started on resorting to the main thread (because of the underlying UIKit code) in the age of structured concurrency.

All in all, the concept of SwiftUI coupled with structured concurrency is beyond amazing but its maturing process is still underway.
I don’t think there is that implicit assumption. My understanding of the principle is that a person would never get “promoted again”, because their incompetence at their level prevents it.

Essentially: if you’re good at a job, you get promoted out of it. If you’re not good at a job, you don’t get promoted out of it. So the end state for everyone is that they remain in jobs they are not good at.
It hardly matters what sources you are using if you filter it through something that has less understanding than a two year old, if any, no matter how eloquent it can express itself.
Xcode Cloud doesn’t actually support running tests on devices. Some of the marketing tries to imply that it does, but it’s simulators only.
Ah I'm sorry for that. That was a bug from an earlier version that saturated the javascript event loop and caused the microphone to not work properly. This should be fixed as of last month's version.

Sorry again!
You'll never get promoted with that attitude.
I would love to see a study on how banning social media impacts ADHD symptoms.

The current wisdom is as soon as a diagnosis is made: go straight on the meds because there is minimal side-effects. So environmental modifications as treatment are not explored. Plus, once meds are involved, you now have a stimulant dependence to deal with too involving a afternoon crash, and increased anxiety, etc. Then your on anti-depressants to counteract these side-effects, etc. etc.

I was listening to the All-In podcast and Chamath's child got a diagnosis recently, and they said: absolutely no meds. Then took his iPad away and symptoms decreased dramatically.
> Israel is a annulling any distinction between a civilian and combatants, and treating the entire civilian population as combatants, including by employing dubious mass surveillance tactics.

By dressing soldiers in civilian clothes, Hamas forces Israel to guess who is or isn't a combatant. Given that Israel has to make such calls, shouldn't they collect all available information to make them as accurately as they can? Shouldn't we be more concerned about mistakes (leading to civilians deaths) than about privacy?
For YC/HN to peddle fewer platitudes, euphemisms, and equivocations.

At what point does preservation of this hallucinated wealth game become forced conservation of history and get in the way of the “freedom” part?

Why are we socially trained to accept “people say Musk is rich so it must be true?”

It’s all a socialized hallucination backed by government force. It’s kind of a huge joke.

Let’s just get drunk and shoot pistols at the workers feet. At least it’s honest.
Quite a long discussion of how important the "best" universities are to starting a startup. Nothing YC-specific.

> And if you want to start a startup you should try to get into the best university you can, because that's where the best cofounders are. It's also where the best employees are. When Larry and Sergey started Google, they began by just hiring all the smartest people they knew out of Stanford, and this was a real advantage for them.

> The empirical evidence is clear on this. If you look at where the largest numbers of successful startups come from, it's pretty much the same as the list of the most selective universities.

> I don't think it's the prestigious names of these universities that cause more good startups to come out of them. Nor do I think it's because the quality of the teaching is better. What's driving this is simply the difficulty of getting in. You have to be pretty smart and determined to get into MIT or Cambridge, so if you do manage to get in, you'll find the other students include a lot of smart and determined people.

> You don't have to start a startup with someone you meet at university... but universities are the main source of cofounders. And because they're where the cofounders are, they're also where the ideas are, because the best ideas grow out of projects you do with the people who become your cofounders.

> So the list of what you need to do to get from here to starting a startup is quite short. You need to get good at technology, and the way to do that is to work on your own projects. And you need to do as well in school as you can, so you can get into a good university, because that's where the cofounders and the ideas are.
Endlessh-go: a Golang SSH tarpit that traps bots/scanners
Actually it might raise red flags. Overqualified for a junior role, won't stay in the position at that level.
Sorry, you have been blocked

You are unable to access databricks.com

"Open", right.
> Likely none: It's counted by looking at what a panel of users do with their smartphones.

I take it you never saw a bot farm before. Do a quick Google image search for some perspective.
Great. Raise the bond back to what it was.
”The AI system knows everything about Hamas: what they said, what they published […] it analyzes behavior, predicts risks, and raises alerts.”

”Well aware of this Hamas members fed their enemy the data that they wanted to hear. The AI system, it turned out, knew everything about the terrorist except what he was thinking.”

When your opponent can see everything you do and hear everything you say, the only defence is privacy. In the novel The Three Body Problem this is taken to an extreme: the only privacy is inside the human mind and so select individuals are allowed to make decisions based on strategies known only to them which they have never said aloud. Science fiction has become reality.
I could not find anything similar in Linode (Akamai) TOS:

https://www.linode.com/legal/

Nor does AWS, that I could find, except with the PartyRock created apps:

https://aws.amazon.com/service-terms/

Both of the above TOS explain intent, for example, to monitor data services for metrics. Vultr's clause (12.1) does not explain intent. The phrase "for purposes of providing services" is a vague intent.
I think this is going to turn out to be a great period for people to have started their own businesses instead of hunting for the same job (or worse) that they just get laid off from.
Apply Pay?
I think the tokio library does this for rust
It is indeed how you define work. You can quibble if it has to be fully focused producing assets, back to back meetings or just thinking about work related stuff, but let’s take a simple one; what I get paid for on paper. I would say, if my pay slip says I worked 80*4 hours then I did. Meals are almost always work really; we sit together and talk code; I also think, at least where I live, breaks like meals are included in your contract as paid time, so I consider them work no matter what we talk/think about.

I think a different view is; many of my none-IT acquaintances ‘work’ (in the definition you are looking at) maybe 1 hour a day, and get paid for 32-36 hours (never any overtime, ever, just exactly their contractual hours). But they would say they work 5-6 hours a day. They think I am crazy for working 8+.

Realistically, focused asset creating hours, I do 3-5 hours (usually early in the morning), but I easily spend 5 hours just chatting with my colleagues helping them and they me. Doesn’t burn me out for the past 30 years; it would do if I was forced 8 hour focused asset producing.
Non-toll roadways are a common-pool resource with significant externalities. They invite overuse and push most of the harms of overuse on others (locals, pedestrians, etc).

Congestion charges or tolls are a good way to put a price on the resource and make market mechanisms work.

Then the resources can be used for whatever produces the greatest benefit (and thus is willing to pay the most for use of the resource), and the tolls obtained can pay to address the externalities.
Show HN: Lead generation engine with contents strategy enhancer
Currently, our platform has an SEO-optimized content system and a newsletter tool. These help customers focus on creating quality content. Soon, we'll add more SEO tools, like keyword analysis and content distribution on LinkedIn and Twitter.
You've never seen a great developer turn into an awful manager after a promotion and then stay at that level?
reminds me of the "multimedia PC" of the 90s. But at least that branding didn't enforce cloud services and Microsoft telemetry
anecdotally they are not used much. Sharing is different and does not involves using social network tools, they are just links to social media networks you need not use their trackers for that. Displaying fb/twitter likes is a different thing altogether and would require their trackers.
Guess we'll see how well this ages.
Web filled to the brim with bot content isn't my idea of human friendly.
Important life lesson everyone should watch: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9yUZTTLpDtk
> Only 20%?

I think you're focusing on absolute numbers, while losing perspective of how traffic dropped. Twitter now runs rampant with disinformation bots from nation-states which were previously countered or outright banned. The 20% represents the difference between all the organic traffic that ceased to exist and all the twitter spam full of disinformation introduced after Elon Musk opened its floodgates.

I think ad companies are a good canary. See their change attitude towards Twitter following Elon Musk's takeover.
This is not handy if I almost always want to listen music as albums but I have bunches of mp3 files.
There were a lot of incompetent parents, but they pushed ahead blindly.

Today can recognize when they'd bee a pie parent and choose not to do it anyway.
Westpac has been saying just this week that their big transformation will be done in the next few years.
I've never worked in banking but having seen some other big transformation projects in my career, I'm not optimistic.
Ah just what I needed, more anxiety.
From the wiki page:

"In 2018, professors Alan Benson, Danielle Li, and Kelly Shue analyzed sales workers' performance and promotion practices at 214 American businesses to test the veracity of the Peter principle. They found that these companies tended to promote employees to a management position based on their performance in their previous position, rather than based on managerial potential. Consistent with the Peter principle, the researchers found that high performing sales employees were likelier to be promoted, and that they were likelier to perform poorly as managers, leading to considerable costs to the businesses.[15][16][2]"
> the problem of course being that some individuals never hit upon that realization -- and the statistics regarding the matter make it look like that revelation is more likely to come to an individual who is older, financially secure, and mentally well.

For some it is really never.
Organizations commonly fail by deluding themselves. One form of self-delusion is confusing motion for progress. The author's point is that the Pentagon thinks it is funding technology but isn't getting value for its money. It's failing to do so because it lacks the will or ability to unite expertise, authority, and responsibility in a single brain. When organizations diffuse responsibility or grant authority to people unequipped to distinguish motion from progress, the result is always waste and stagnation.

Effective leadership is a continual struggle against this entropic tendency of organizations towards management of appearances over world-of-atoms results. During those rare interludes in history when a strong leader manages to temporarily reverse this organizational entropy, magic happens. Consider ULA versus SpaceX or DeepMind vs. OpenAI

Imagine how much further up the technology ladder we as a species would be if institutional competence were the norm, not an unstable and fleeting miracle.
What about https://gnustep.github.io/ ?

edit: GNUstep provides the foundations for a portable desktop environment, but delegates this task to other projects, like:

- The GNUstep Application Project: http://www.nongnu.org/gap/

- NEXTSPACE: https://github.com/trunkmaster/nextspace

- Etoile: http://www.etoile-project.org/
When to Quit?
Hi, I have been working with a co-founder for the past 8 months. We were both fresh graduates and because of our background in good colleges, some people provided us with a grant and also helped us get the first pilot. But we haven't made any progress for quite some time (> 3 months). My cofounder is adamant that he will do sales but no one considers that he is a good sales guy. I handle tech and built the MVP but it has become really difficult to build for 0 paying customers. I am thinking of taking a break, going to a job, and coming back to the startup space after a year or two when I have much more technical skills and a problem space I am excited about (I have lost interest in the current problem space). What do you guys suggest?
Saying that edtech was a poor investment of public funds and not good for education is hardly "trying to control people."
Never saw that one coming. Well except at the many fast food and counter service restaurants where you already have to order using a (pathogen-coated) touchscreen.
Based on our conversations, yeah - many want to increase the accuracy of their timesheets. For some, this is the main driver of adoption. For many, it's the time savings from cutting out manual timekeeping.

Even for firms/attorneys that are not super detail-oriented, the software would offer a log of their work as a basis for their bills.
The LLM itself should realize it’s too big and only put the important parts on the gpu. If you’re asking questions about literature there’s no need to have all the params on the gpu, just tell it to put only the ones for literature on there.
I have heard the same thing (wrongly) said of Van Gogh, whose poor mental condition towards the end of his life was almost certainly caused by syphilis.

This is not to underplay the impact of poisonous paints: the entire cadmium range (cadmium red and yellow), Naples yellow ( lead antimonate), Flake white (lead again). For more horrors, check out the book artist beware.

Looking at the article you linked, the evidence for Caravaggio's death by lead poisoning does indeed seem conclusive. However, IMO it almost certainly was not through the use of paint itself, but from the careless manufacture of paint. In those days, most painters made their own paint by mixing powder pigment with oil. Powdered lead pigments is 100 times more dangerous than pigment locked into an oil emulsion.

A dear artist friend of mine died as a result of their art. God bless you Jim where ever you are.
> This book was meant as satire, and the fact that so many people take it as fact is honestly quite concerning.

The article says it was satire but it also says it was based on their real research. Also satire doesn’t necessarily mean something is meant to be untrue
Housing costs have increased as much as they have because people can afford to bid them up because other things do not take up as much of income.
> only to find out they've been working as a software developer for over a year and a half already

Lol. Come back after a few more years.

> With emerging technologies all the time and improvements to existing technology…

Almost all of the apparent fast change is superficial, an illusion. Software development actually moves very slowly. It still looks much more like 1985 than not. Every “innovation” does not represent a revolution or paradigm shift.

> experienced engineers are also more likely to be hesitant to try newer tools and technologies and instead be "set in their ways." This can lead to them missing out on really terrific advancements in the ecosystem and tools.

An age-biased myth. Evidence? Experienced programmers may not believe the hype or jump on to this month’s fad like a junior, but don’t mistake experience and common sense for too old to learn and change.

> Even though all my experience up to that point had been part-time work while I was still in school, I felt like I knew my team's area of the codebase as well as anyone else

Possibly true, but seems more like an example of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

> I was just a step below architect in a quarter-billion dollar organization only 4 months after graduating from university.

That says something about the organization. I had a similar opportunity early on and got promoted fast, but looking back on it I realize that was more due to organizational dysfunction and my younger self’s willingness to work crazy hard for a better title.
We have added an upload sample file button thanks for feedback @refset
I think I was an extra on that movie. I say 'think' and Derik never told me what movie he was shooting. Good times.
nobody would want to shop online rather than go to a mall

But we do have Best Buy, where you can inspect the product before you buy it. And the wife complains about Walmart grocery shopping, where the Walmart employee picked bad vegetables or made really silly substitutions.
is there a greater likelihood of substance abuse and smoking in ADHD individuals without stimulant medication?

If meds still offset that risk, meds are still a better option. Everything is a choice between evils.
Yes, in any data product scenario it is extremely easy to find a signal and extremely difficult to validate that it's the most important one.
I'm not sure I understand your point here. If the goal is less traffic then steps that lead to less traffic are effective.

Presumably to get less traffic you need to make the choice (to drive a car into the city) less attractive. Making it cost more would seem to do that.

Of course $15 is not enough, because while that will act on the "unattractive" side, there will then be less traffic, which will the increase the "attractive" side. The toll will need to increase to find the balance where it dwarfs the no-traffic convenience.

This is how I played out in London for example. Traffic has been reduced, but the connection charge is quite high.

Which is fine, those who want the convenience, and feel it offers good value for money can use it. And public transport (busses) is faster.