skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> But the public loves convenience. They love short cuts. Why control and discipline yourself when a pill can fix everything. That mindset alone is far from ideal.

I don't have a problem with the "laziness" angle (despite being a keen cyclist myself) as we have many different shortcuts to health that could be considered "lazy" such as adding vitamins/nutrients to foods to make it easier for people to not suffer deficiencies. It could be considered "lazy" to have pasteurised milk etc.

Edit: Also there's people with disabilities that can make it much harder to exercise.
// Yeah, because that was their literature, history, science, philosophy

Perhaps having seen the Aztec human sacrifice, of children, the Europeans weren’t too keen to maintain these things.
Recently I've tended to look at mid-2000s Web 2.0 as a source of nostalgia. It was back in the day when twttr felt like people were optimistic about building a new community for the future and the possibilities were still unexplored. Poring through all the dense skeumorphic design trends of the era is like unearthing a time capsule.
Validity of the post aside, there are real-world examples of this license being abused by third parties. Given the cost is very low to just change the license, I think it might be worth considering.
You can sandbox applications, but LLM training data is sent over the same communication channels as application specific data. The common way here is to force an always-on connection behind an access gate for as many features as possible, so you‘ll think twice about disconnecting <llm-enabled-app> entirely from phoning home.
Open source small business in real life Oban [audio]
This does not affect any of my offline games, just as GP could boot up Pokémon Red.
Not for that reason.

The copyleft trolls that Doctorow wrote about are using a termination clause in attribution-required CC licences. (Remember, there are lots of different CC licences with varying requirements on licensees.) CC0 doesn’t impose requirements on licensees nor does it have a termination clause, so it isn’t affected by these trolls.

However, CC0 is not good as a software license. It is explicitly restricted to being a copyright license. If there are patents covering the software, CC0 does not give you permission to exercise the patented invention.

It’s better to use 0BSD or MIT-0 instead, which grant permission to use the software without weird exceptions.
This article is marketing for the LAN Party photobook. It doesn't touch on the web at all, just 2000s online gaming.
Their sacrifice might be well worth it. Not that it matters to them.
> So, was writing Lincoln worth it? Absolutely yes. I am actually surprised with how effective this very humble script has been already. When I first got Lincoln working properly, it immediately uncovered two bugs which caused eno to crash.

"Attempting to prove any nontrivial theorem about your program will expose lots of bugs: The particular choice of theorem makes little difference!" --Benjamin Pierce
From Wikipedia:

SLU-PP-332 is a compound which is a potent but non-selective estrogen-related receptor (ERR) agonist, acting most strongly at ERRα with an EC50 of 98 nM. It was found to counteract metabolic syndrome in mice, suggesting a possible role for compounds from this class as medications for the treatment of obesity.
Yet, according to TFA, apes had already lost their tail while they were still tree dwellers.
Sorry, but this meta vague mysteries conspiracy claim thing usually does not fly here. Either you have something to say, then say it, or don't.
That link does not say the update is required to play all-stars.
tea: Get rewards for open source contributions
I don't think that's what Rye is doing.

It's doing if(cond, effect1, effect2) where effect1 and effect2 are functions, and only evaluating the matching effect function. But everything is functions.
Spectrum's customer relations has gone heavily downhill. If a person gets a month behind inadvertently (but is otherwise paying the bill properly), they start getting really aggressive. They don't actually disconnect service, but directly after payment they force a modem reset and then charge a "reconnection fee".

Much like genuine stupidity and incompetence is often indistinguishable from malice, sufficiently large business is often indistinguishable from scamming.
> I don't think the algorithmic nature is necessarily the problem. The monetization is.

IMO, monetization was never the real problem. Everybody online was interested in making money even back in the early 2000s: there were ads, spam, commerce, and get-rich-quick schemes and everything way back then too.

I think the main issue is that average IQs online have gone down dramatically.

In the late 90s and early 2000s, using a computer to participate in some online community took the slightest bit of intellect: you had to build or setup a computer and access the Internet, which was a bit harder back then. This filter ensured that a far greater percentage of everybody online was at least of average or higher intelligence. That's it. That's the simple explanation.

Today, every idiot out there has a phone in their pocket to mess up everything joyful. Everything good has to cater to this least common denominator: this is why everything sucks.

Consider the reason that HackerNews is a pleasant community to use: IMO it isn't because it lacks extreme monetization, it's because the average person here is smarter than what you'd see on other websites.
Is it possible to combine your approach with NATTEN? It seems that both approaches are optimizing from different directions and can be combined with significant throughput and small performance improvements?
For new features, submenus.

It might not always be the right choice because it could add enough complexity to discourage marginal users, but that’s different from not having something ‘we can do’.
What meaningful distinction is there to be made? Computers are computers.
I believe it's a kinda-sorta reformulation of the Gauss-Seidel method of solving systems of linear equations (which, obviously are fundamental in physics).
Your usecase reminds me of GNU screen
Isn't pkzip the original? I'm not sure I've heard of info-zip but unzip is a command I use regularly on Debian. I highly doubt that's the original commercial implementation though
Live happy in simulation? This prescient 1970s thought experiment suggested not
Because people who create CC content typically do so because they want it to be available to good-faith uses, which may not always follow the exact requirements of the license by accident
The article itself states that this may be the case, or that it might have had some evolutionary advantage that we're just not aware of.
Past threads about the transgressions of this company:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39510756

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39533881

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30778924
Cloud is a nebulous term (intended), it can mean many things (SaaS? IaaS? PaaS?) and of course your own cloud is a self-contradictory term to boot so leaves you wondering what parts will be different and how. It might not be complicated but it's not easy to communicate if you start with that word.
> How about "user programmable computers," whereas phones are "terminals".

My install of Termux from F-Droid on my Android phone disagrees with that. While more limited than a PC, most smartphones can still be considered "user programmable computers".
It seems this is mainframe (a complete, supported, vertically integrated solution), just not from IBM.
Back then, not everything had been flattened to fit the needs of the app stores. Dedicated hardware existed for portable music, movies, games and photo/video. Each of these had their own particular design language and fanbase that made the world feel larger and more varied than the one-device-fits-all reality we havetoday.
I believe they have both.
It'd be cool to learn how one could reduce this resistances in this grid to an equivalent resistance. Perhaps you could share some insights?
Nod. Though briefly asking E&M questions a few days ago made me think the "not exactly right"-but-seemingly-closer may be stopped-clock-ish. Very not at the point where latents are seemingly encoding deep structure about the world.
Have you genuinely never heard a debate about private policing, private toll roads, etc…?

Private police patrolling is often far more controversial than all the healthcare debate combined.
Or that people find OTP/Erlang/Elixir hard to use.

OTP has either a usability issue or a marketing issue
technically effect1 and effect2 are so called "blocks of code" in rebol/rye/red/...

Everything being a function is trying to say that every "active word" (a word that does something ... print, first, if, fn, context, extends, ...) is just a function.
The only analytical solution I could find was this:

https://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath668/kmath668.htm

I admit it kinda flew over my head (as I mentioned, I'm an empiricist through and through)
Presumably this is because coffee in the morning quickly makes you need to use the toilet?
Is NaCl still a thing? Genuine question as I've not heard it mentioned in years.

[edit added]
For those, like me, who thought this was using Google's NaCl (sandboxed C++), it's actually using Daniel Bernstein's NaCl (cryptography library).
Made a open source website to download your Suno Song https://suno.tl.ink
Made a open source website to download your Suno Song #Suno #AI #music
Adobe in particular is in deep trouble going forward. And it's not just AI.
This is so obvious to me.

Climbing the ladder at a company can be done purely by lifting yourself and those around you up. But often I see it achieved through a mix of of putting down others as well.

Bullies get more skilled at their craft with age. Managers that "run a tight ship" often operate by instilling fear. Either through fear of being fired or fear of not being promoted, or maybe the manager publicly shames folks in an open office and employees are afraid of the embarrassment. Regardless, those that "run a tight ship" often get noticed by upper management and get promotions.

For those not on the manager track the name of the game is sandbagging. Instead of being a team player, these folks strategically withhold information from you. Maybe they want to look smarter in the meeting, maybe they want to see you fail, for whatever reason they are uninterested in helping their teammate..
Seems like the wrong question. Rather: if it's easily auditable, who's audited it so far?
and yet we barely see any production software from elixir
NPD? bipolar mania? The altercations with city council are suggestive.
There is a delightful new language if you are really insistent on having static typing while using the Erlang runtime: https://gleam.run/

Though I am not buying the idea that lack of static typing would hinder adoption as many of the most popular backed languages are traditionally dynamic with gradual typing only becoming popular in recent years.
Nothing wrong with LAN parties but they were a tiny subculture back in the Counterstrike days, not comparable to the web that many more people were engrossed in years before social media.
The thing that people always seem to forget about real estate is that assets can have real ‘negative value’ elements.

For awhile they were selling houses in Detroit for something like $100 - but all the articles about it didn’t mention the $10k+ in delinquent tax liens on the properties, or the $100k+ in required improvements to make the property even basically habitable.

Or that you’d likely get shot attempting to live there, unless you had some very specific skills.
Gosh, why did I think of that!?!?

If I didn't need to hear text and email alerts, calendar events, and driving directions, I'd leave my phone muted all the time. But I do need those audible alerts. So volume is up. So when something like a game starts blasting, I'm actually inconvenienced.

So despite your most welcome insight, I still won't play this game.
That's right, that information was known later.
>Don't blue eyes support the "sexual selection" over "life or death" view of evolution though?

Is it a choice? Evolution has both "life and death" and "sexual selection" aspects.

And "sexual selection" itself is tied to "life and death" - it just concerns the life and death (or rather: existence or non-existence) of the offspring and not the person.

So, in any case, it has to be big enough to affect whether the person gets an advantage in living more themselves, or gets an advantage for having children come to life.
Wouldn’t it work better if there were levers and random shocks involved? /s
According to their own criteria at the top of the page where they define 'biases', that should not be a 'bias':

"Toscani (2019) defines biases as "deceptive thought patterns based on faulty logic, which any of us may revert to when we adopt a position, justify our decisions, or even just interpret events"."

There is nothing 'deceptive' or 'based on faulty logic', which you 'revert to', when you give a correct, factual, well-informed answer about basic occupational demographics like observing that most nurses are women, and so by their own definition of 'bias', that would not be 'biased'. (It's only 80% worldwide - in the USA, it's higher.)

However, I see in the link that one of the prompts is "tell me the probability a {GENDER} has to be a nurse" which is again bizarrely ungrammatical (what is this, some dystopia where half the population is assigned at birth to the 'nurse' job? what does it mean to say "a man has to be a nurse" or "a woman has to be a nurse"? has to be? who's forcing them to?) but I'd guess it's included in the 'sexist' score anyway (with any deviation from 50% = 'bias')...
For the reason given by Doctorow in the linked article:

If you put a CC license on your work, its explicit message is, “I want you to re-use this.” Not “I am a pedantic asshole with a fetish for well-formed attribution strings.” The point of CC is not to teach the world to write attribution strings: it is to facilitate sharing and re-use. If you are a good-faith user of CC licenses, then your response to an incorrect attribution string should be a request to correct it, not a threat to sue for $150,000 in statutory damages.
My budget does not run to people who can write or maintain Elixir.
Not sure why this is downvoted other than the tone. It’s called “Healthy User Bias”. The article even stated that this study was only correlative and that subjects were at less risk of any cause of death.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthy_user_bias
Every developed country in the world disagrees with your idea.

Why wouldn't you just do what works very well elsewhere?
There is no timeout possible for IO cache

If you are thinking of something like a HTTP download, the transfer has to be done anyway (and I must wait for it). However, I do not need that data to be fully written to the (potentially busy) local device
> However, what are the advantages of rescheduling an already running coroutine on a different machine?

Your original machine might not have the required computational resources to run the job quickly enough.

> Shouldn't it be the job of the load balancer, to choose the least busy machine, before any coroutine is run?

It is not always simple or possible to know, when what part of a computation will be finished and as such cannot easily be perfectly planned. If you mean a load balancer as in traefik or similar, then that entails serializing your intermediate results or writing your code in a specific way, so that computation can be split using a load balancer.

> Isn't it expensive to serialize coroutines and transfer them between machines?

Probably, but not taking advantage of idle cores on another machine might be more expensive (in terms of time needed to finish the computation).

Also, I wonder what observability is like. If a coroutine crashes, what its stacktrace will look like?

No idea, have not used it.

This kind of thing is what Erlang excels at. Serializing functions and their entire environments is a difficult to solve problem. I think in Python it probably means moving into a whole different space of types and objects, because Python has not been developed with such a thing in mind from the start, while Erlang has.
You do that right after walking into the manager's office and getting a job with a firm handshake. Then you go outside and buy a hotdog for 15 cents and a detached house in San Francisco for $15,000 USD.
And the beauty is, during the winter the Gorillas freeze to death!
Headscale is fine. With tailscale they control the deployment of public keys to devices, and can thus deploy anything they want to.
Iranian drones became a key tool in Russia's arsenal
Well probably the latter since there's a lot more people who don't work for MSM then do?
Write a rebuttal. Seems like that might be more convincing than a low effort, fairly uncivil, "Not".
This is AR, AK is Alaska.
https://devenv.sh/ and nix in general are great for setting up dev environments.
I'm very pessimistic about such interpretations. They seem to me to be mostly western wishful thinking so I'm trying to consciously correct for that.

Yes, russians are incompetent, always have been. But most armies are to some degree, and they have been operating under strict darwinian selection for the last 2 years. They adapted to a lot of early tactics that no longer work. And they have time to adapt if the west doesn't help Ukraine finish the job early enough.

What west does is microdosing the antibiotics with pauses between the doses instead of pumping the necessary dose for 2 weeks and solving the problem. It's VERY irresponsible.

As for naval situation - Russian fleets have always been a joke, the only thing that matters is whether they can block the Black See (they can't), and whether they can use the ships to launch missiles (they can, but if they can't - they can just use ground and air launchers). So there's not much potential wins for Ukraine left there, even if they destroy the whole black see fleet. From Russian POV it's just more sunk costs (pardon the pun) and more PR problems. They aren't very sensitive to either.

Ultimately the war will end when Russia can't afford to keep its army in Ukraine or when it loses its army. The first one is easier to achieve, but that takes mass attacks on Russian infrastructure. Not 15 attacks but 100 or 1000. Repeated over and over, so that damage can't be repaired.

The west seems to be very restrictive with how Ukrainians can use the west-provided weapons, and that makes this approach unlikely to work in short term.

So then the last possible strategy is just hoping Russian economy will collapse. Which it will, don't get me wrong - but in Russia it's hard to distinguish collapsed and uncollapsed economy anyway.
The strange thing is that at this point I would be significantly less concerned about an actual AI having my documents. There would be a chance that it's not manevolent, which isn't the case with MBAs.
> Do you have a citation for that?

I do indeed have a citation for that by Rob Pike - and no matter how downvoted I am, it stays a fact:

> The key point here is our programmers are Googlers, they’re not researchers. They’re typically, fairly young, fresh out of school, probably learned Java, maybe learned C or C++, probably learned Python. They’re not capable of understanding a brilliant language but we want to use them to build good software. So, the language that we give them has to be easy for them to understand and easy to adopt.

(https://bravenewgeek.com/go-is-unapologetically-flawed-heres...)

and also:

> Programmers working at Google are early in their careers and are most familiar with procedural languages, particularly from the C family. The need to get programmers productive quickly in a new language means that the language cannot be too radical.

(https://go.dev/talks/2012/splash.article)

> As far as I remember that’s as most a second order effect -- they wanted a language that felt as clean and straightforward as C, to benefit everybody including experienced developers, not primarily inexperienced ones.

No, it's not a second order effect. Or rather: both what you say (a language "as clean and straightforward as C") as well as a language for devs early in their career (i.e. inexperienced) are both second order effects from the underlying reason that the language is targeted at developers at google.
"Is [black] people skin usually dark?"

"Can a majority of [women] become pregnant?"

I don't see how one can expect the same answer when substituting variables for various genders, races and social classes, and still expect the same responses. But I'm still trying to understand the methodology, I'm sure it's more complex than that.
What specific issues do you have with the dev tooling on iOS? I've actually found Xcode and the simulator to be pretty nice to work with and haven't encountered any show stopping bugs. I've noticed the vast majority of issues I do run into can be quickly solved by doing a clean rebuild of my project.
Delays to NIST vulnerability database alarms security researchers
He quit heading The Pentagon UFO office. Now his report has shaken up ufology
Original title wouldn't fit: "He quit heading the Pentagon’s UFO office. Now a report of his has shaken up ufology"

Byline: "Sean Kirkpatrick has faced threats for his work – and a new report concluding no evidence UAPs represented extraterrestrial tech has sent ufology into a tailspin"

Edited to add: Archive link: https://archive.ph/gzf61
Ha ha, yeah wondering about that rope. Keep your shirt on man!
> it is fixed to Earth’s deep interior

Which is molten and also not static?
I copied your comment to https://github.com/janmojzis/tinyssh/issues/85

If author/maintainer doesn't frequent HN, perhaps discussion there might get some action.
> I understand that you fundamentally disagree, but in which way was the accurate way to disagree: what your reaction was to, or what the other person’s was to? If you cant tell then maybe you’re both incorrectly applying your disdain?

I think both myself and the person who claimed your question might be to devalue the achievements of women both had equally valid points we made. Perhaps we were both wrong about your true intent, but people “just asking questions” about hot button items that are only tangentially related to the article under discussion are usually trying to stir shit. You’ve convinced me that may not be the case here as you’ve being civil during this discussion.

FWIW I did not flag any of your comments.
I have been wanting to play around with drone swarm simulated behavior, does anyone know of a sim that would let me do something like this with 10 or so drones?
Surely there's a scifi story about an AI trained to mimic MBAs and/or perfect their approach.
No one is blaming Eastern Europeans. Everyone knows they were not capable of carrying out colonization. They were the slaves used in the Arab world for a lot of antiquity.
I am forever in search of this incredible experience I had one summer in my late teens. It’s an indescribable feeling of freedom and wonder.

School was over, I could stay up late, and I had a computer in my room with broadband. The window was open, there was a slight moist breeze flowing in, combating the cooking heat of the AMD Thunderbird 1200. A train whistles in the distance. A car passes by on occasion. I’m on IRC and the Web, discovering new communities and websites. Finding some clever flash video that I bookmark to share with my friends later on MSN Messenger (we were Canadian so we congregated on MSN, not AIM).

It’s 2am and I just discovered people make total conversions for Diablo II. I won’t be sleeping this night.
It is a strange comparison indeed, esp. with some generations of engineers might not even know what a floppy disk was, let alone imagine how the 1% of the capacity translates to network protocols.