skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That is exactly right. In fact, cookie cutter stuff helps to express oneself even more. If the standard stuff serves its utility well, then it spares the energy of having to think and care about it, and leaves more for the rest of the stuff, including self-expression.
Where has it actually been tried?
They could run in your local company infrastructure or on my own desktop pc.

I would be happily running my custom agent models on my gpu without sharing those models and still being able to use the browser as an interface.
Or just evidence that there were none in this case.

If a bunch of scientists and astronomers directed their best instruments at finding a teacup orbiting the sun somewhere between Earth and Mercury because a small number of people insisted it was there, but never locate it, the more reasonable conclusion wouldn't be that we're not good at finding orbiting teacups. It would be that assertions of its existence were based on bad reasoning.
without total removal of advertising industry? no change, they will try to find all the ways to skim around the law because they are so entrenched.

I'll take regulated market over unregulated one though.
Well, if you use the word "objectively", I would expect some numbers to back it up.

Yes, it's probably the first time that retail is allowed to trade options. But it's not the first time that retail is all in in stocks. I've tried to find a funny number to back it up - just check the Wiki on 1929 crash - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_Street_Crash_of_1929 - there was more money lent to 'small investors' so they can buy on margin ... than the entire amount of currency circulating at the time.

On average, all those retail guys will loose money - that's the sad truth. In the long term, the stocks simply follow the earnings - all other movements around this trends are pretty much a zero sum game - and most skilled operators are not loosing money in that game.

Price to earning ratio is just the number of years the company 'pays for itself' if you buy it. PER at 40s for big chunks of main indexes mean that either there will be tremendous progress in the economy that will boost the earnings or people are hoping to resell to a bigger fool.

Note: I work in finance, and I very much see the retail involvement in stocks. Hedge Funds and banks, are making a ton of money out of them, that's for sure.
Not all garbage collected languages are made equal, some of them, like C# and .NET, do provide all the performace knobs that are needed for C++ like coding.

People only have to learn how to use them, instead of placing all garbage collected languages into the same basket.

In this specific case, MSIL and .NET were designed to support C++ as well, and languages like C# and F# do have ways to access those features, and even if some feature isn't exposed at the language grammar level, you can emit the same MSIL that C++/CLI would generate.
Probably still not fixing problem of playing different games on same account. That is one on PC and one on Deck. Even if other one is free to play...

And using different accounts would mess up cloud saves...
Almost like the only competition of Nvidia is the niece of the CEO.
Bill Gates' TerraPower plans to build first US next-generation nuclear plant
Swisscom buys Vodafone Italia for $8.7B as telcos consolidate
True, I still look forward to have Valhala, eventually.
IIRC, it’s to allow them to relicense contributions in the event they decide to move away from MIT?
Without even reading the whole article, I can tell the author is German.

Create dumb and pointless rules and enforce them with highest passion.

Believe that you're the smartest person who only understands these rules.

Serve nothing but the soul sucker bureaucracy.

Many people are leaving Germany pretty much because of this. Startup founders often do pointless work just to not get in prison.

The author of course has zero experience building anything. He is the amazing CTO. He'll teach you how to do. Because he's superior than rest of the world.

The society here has tendency to descend into madness with a strange group behaviour.

History. Rhymes.
3. The runtime also supports C++, and one emits the same MSIL code sequence that the C++ compiler would generate.

Which is why WASM isn't that great novelty for grey beards.
It sounds like the big change here is allowing for playing a game from a family member's library even while they are playing some other game. Currently accessing one game from a family member's library locks that family member out of playing anything at all, requiring offline mode shenanigans to circumvent.

This was the big limitation we run into constantly in my house - if that's removed, this is pretty awesome news.
Very happy here too. The previous iteration (Family Sharing) locked you out of the entire library while someone was playing, now it's on a game granularity.
The multiple copies part is also great. It was a hassle to set up an account and buy games for minor just to play certain coop games together. (Remote play together already works well for couch-coop games though)
Any product that requires many years of R&D has to rely on trade secrets or on software patents, since otherwise the company could not possibly compete with copycats who reverse engineer their know how and therefore have zero R&D costs. There is often no other way, not every market is based on constant fake innovation and feature creep.
Related (sort of): with the demise of nitter and increased tightening of Twitter's API, I'm wondering if anyone here would be interested in helping build a more robust mirror service to feed into ActivityPub instances like bird.makeup.

bird.makeup works "okay-ish" in the sense that it manages to get the most popular Twitter accounts, but for the smaller ones it takes a long time to refresh (days) and it seems like it can not handle any more people using it.
We actually thought about a pure microcontroller solution, but stuffing a zigbee coordinator, a mqtt parser and a lorawan stack into an uC seemed a bit overwhelming. It is technically possible with beefier SoCs, but as most ingredients we needed were well available for a PI, we went this route while building the first prototype.
This was on AGH (Akademia Górniczo Hutnicza) in Krakow, Poland. I did my masters there. The course was kind of zero to hero type of thing.

Here is the syllabus (unfortunately it is in polish but maybe you will be able to translate it): https://sylabusy.agh.edu.pl/en/document/065a0d32-a947-4234-a...
Pushed some initial changes to make it better, lmk what you think :)
Success in any particular activity is for the most part dependent on the amount of time you are willing to dedicate to doing said thing, which in turn is dependent on the "moral justification" part of your ego.

For example, you could intrinsically feel very good and justified as a person that is able to to work with his hands to build or fix stuff because of whatever reason. In this case you will likely become a very good tradesman, or mechanic or CNC technician, or something dealing with manufacture or repair or construction. In the same way, you fundamentally believe that math contains the answers to everything, you pretty much live and breathe it, and can likely become a professor or researcher at some university or institute.

If you don't have any strong conviction about anything, it becomes much harder to determine the kind of stuff you will be good at because of external factors. For example, you could find yourself among peers that stimulate you emotionally in other ways, and then you end up developing a set of values that cause you to pursue a career that you never have thought of before.
Screen resolution is literally the amount of pixels that fit on a square inch.
It's not a .net thing, it's analysis paralysis that was known before Aesop.
Most of the time i'm not 'inventing' anything new too.

I get a requirement, find a solution and the solution is 99,99999% not a new algorithm. I actually believe i never invented a new algorithm.

Besides the next step is reasoning in GPT-5 and devin shows that GPTs/LLMs can start breaking down tasks.

I don't mind being wrong tbh, there is no risk in it for me if AI will not take my job but i don't believe it. I do believve the progress will be better and better and AI will do more and more reasoning.

It can easily try and do things 1000x fater than us, including reasoning. Its not hard to see that it will also be able to create its own examples and learn from them.
isitdns.com
In context, those are not shockingly high sums. The real problem seems to be what Woit summarizes in this 2004 (!!) comment on his blog:

> It takes a non-trivial amount of time and effort to absorb new mathematical ideas and by so dominating the mathematical end of particle theory for twenty years, string theory has monopolized the time of the mathematically sophisticated members of the community. It has also quite literally driven out of the field a lot of people who were interested in other sorts of ideas about how to apply mathematics to questions in particle theory.

https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=119&cpage=2...

edit: How bonkers is it that another two decades have been pissed away on this?
Life as a Classroom
Eh, if you fit Mark Shuttleworth's template you probably fly through with barely a care in the world.

Meaning you had resourceful parents, went to a good school, tuned your high school life for college applications, and etc.

Who wouldn't want a friendly chat with the CEO before an offer?
Oh no, turns out the thing people really want from AIs is generality because everything else can be done in stupid software!
Sure, but it’s more like someone invented and sold a car then strapped a bunch of knives to it.
Capable of, but the ultrasound used for that is focused, higher intensity and in bursts.

I mean if you want to fearmonger, there's plenty more examples of things that can cause damage if used in a different way, like water, air, electricity, light, etc.

You seem to want to claim that any use of ultrasound is dangerous, but you fail to provide evidence, you just bring in extreme cases and try to claim equivalence. I'm sure there's a fancy sounding fallacy name for that.
There's a series of blog posts by Oren Eini that shows that C# can be sufficiently fast even when you don't really optimize anything. Beating Redis in every benchmark is a whole another level, of course.

https://ayende.com/blog/197412-B/high-performance-net-buildi...
It was resolved just over 100 years ago by Wittgenstein. Either you fully define "understanding", in which case you've answered your question, or you don't clearly define it, it in which case you can't have a meaningful discussion about it because you don't even have an agreement on exactly what the word means.
It would be a bit like washing your hands in tetraethyllead to show that it's totally safe.
You might enjoy this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3W2v7LN-88

I, Pencil by Leonard E Read
I have not seen crabs made out of food before.

What level do you think 'invention' have to be to count as something AI can't do?

The only thing AI needs is a feedback loop and a benchmark/cost function.

If the cost function is page impressions, thats easy. If its running unit tests based from business requirements, thats easy too.
Where do we insert another nickel?
It is interesting to see how Microsoft and the .NET team are building some very impressive hack-your-own-infrastructure project. Yarp is a reverse proxy/API gateway/whatever you do. Now Garnet for memory caches.

Seems they have tons of internal need and are willing to share.
If you upload a real event but you're the only source, it'll be doubted anyway; see also, most UFO sightings.
There's a simple irony in it all. AI's perceived value is based upon and built from human creativity - remove it (and its evolution) and it will end in grey/brown sludge.
QML already uses js?

If you want to use the same API of an existing web framework, I'm sure that wouldn't work, since QML is exposing C++ objects to js code, so the API is set.
Just don't max out the Mac Studio and get both...
Shorewall: Make using Linux firewall easy
An iptables based firewall for systems running the Linux 2.4 or later kernel. Very flexible configuration allows the firewall to be used in a wide variety of firewall/gateway/router and VPN environments.
Isn't the feedback "get better at leetcode" and "talk while you're solving the problem"? These seem to be the universal reasons for rejection.
Their privacy policy https://twstalker.com/pages/privacy doesn't make any sense:

> How do we protect your information?

> We use regular Malware Scanning. We do not use an SSL certificate We only provide articles and information.
There are AI models who can create proper meshes though.
Panama has helped into that direction, it isn't like C# though, for feature parity we will eventually need Valhalla, which since they want to keep existing JARs working, it is taking its time.

Ignoring the type systems from Eiffel, Objective-C, Oberon and Modula-3 linage, even though they were inspirations for Java, has been shown to have been a bad decision in hindsight.
Curious - why are the text un-selectable on the website? Is this because of Astro or did you intentionally do it?

Tested on Chrome and Safari.
> What made a difference was getting people in my team to stop doing it, and making it clear when things were requested and timescales and why we were not able to do it. When deadlines started getting missed, the guy got put under a lot of pressure to change the processes, and eventually the business hired someone that ultimately diminished the original guy's role.

This is the way. If a process is slowing you down, let it slow you down to a grinding halt. BUT document and communicate the reason clearly, frequently and to the correct people.

If you can attach a clear cost to the process being slow, even better.
I think this is handled by the radio modules or else they wouldn’t be certified, so you just have to make sure you don’t order a US-only module.

FYI there is also a 2.4GHz version of Lora. It has very high sensitivity modes close to the performance of the sub-GHz version, but also has high performance modes that give you up to 2Mbps.
And this isn't new. A fad in films in the 90's was hyper-realistic masks on the one side, and make-up and prosthetics artists on the other, making people look like other people.

Faking things is not new, and you've always been right to mistrust what you see on the internet. "AI" technology has made it easy, convenient, accessible and affordable to more people though, beforehand you needed image/video editing skills and software, a good voice mod, be a good (voice) actor, etc.
Bringing Heroku Magic to Container Images
Thank you! We received a Netidee grant (https://www.netidee.at/), which is a popular funding source for Austrian open source projects with a focus on Internet technologies.
Thinking about it, the failsafe should be that if one side fails first, it gets stuck against the track. Although I don't think the one in the vid would, because the track points inward
I am the exact opposite of a Type-A person. I know you think everyone who wants a return to the office is some tyrannical middle manager type, but I just get depressed if I don't have a place to go with familiar people every day. I don't give a shit about work and I don't care to work anywhere where managers think we need to be surveilled. I just don't want to be suicidal because I haven't spoken to a human in 5 days, and I only realise I haven't gone outside at about 4pm, at which point its often dark here in the UK.

And no, all office being remote with the option for people to come in doesn't work for me. That's what my last job is. You know whats worse than working from home? Going into the office to find nobody is there, anyone who is there you haven't seen for 6 months and have no rapport with, and you feel like you're in some sterile empty hall. I'm saying only a hybrid job where I knew people would not give up on going to the office fit for me. Even I will give up on going to the office if noone really goes and I feel no imperative to. It's just bad for me.
Behind the scenes, I'm 99% confident that Google has deployed AI detection tools and will monitor for it.

That said, unless all the AI generators agree on a way to add an unalterable marker that something is generated, at one point it may become undetectable. May.
This blog post is not about the "inherent value" of Tesla, but more a summary of "Enterprise Value" as defined by:

"enterprise value = market cap + borrowings - cash"

It's neat and not too long.
One of those companies has been sinking money into the "Uncompetitive" section of the hydrogen ladder. The other hasn't.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/hydrogen-ladder-version-50-mi...
The article links to the Unison project, which does optimal spilling and register allocation using constraint programming solvers.

The core idea is that memory for spilling is treated as an additional set of register-like locations, with costs for using.
Isn't this a strange way to put Toyota to be "closer" to Tesla by "enterprise value"? I mean, if toyota had 1T USD debt, it's enterprise value would have been 1.25T, and it would have been more "valuable" than Tesla. But, how is that "better", if you want to invest in a company?

I'm surprised TSLA is in such a good shape, debt-wise.
Here here. Lobbying has nothing to do with corruption. It's here to counterbalance over-zealous regulators who are detached from business reality. Please think of the shareholders.
Composition over Inheritance: My refactoring recipe
A refactoring recipe for replacing inheritance with composition. Code examples in Kotlin
The way to think about this is imagine someone from a 3d world country, living in poverty on the borderline of starvation, and how EXSTATIC they would be to be in your situation. Having a full stomach, roof over their head, disposable income, and a day job where you sit in a chair? Sounds like heaven.

But you don't feel the same, despite being in the that situation. So it naturally follows that your depression is either a frame of mind, or something intrinsic to you, i.e not job dependent. Switching jobs can possibly cause you to not be depressed, but this is a bet that you actually don't have a problem vs sweeping the problem under a rug with a chance of occurring later, which is not a safe bet to take. As such, you should first and foremost seek therapy and psychological evaluation to figure out why you feel that way. It could be stress related, or it could be something else.

For me, what I though was depression was actually a combination of ADHD and being on the spectrum and stress as a result of that.
This reminded me of so many childhood memories with my dad..
They 'needed' them because different vendors were using producing hardware that only worked for one and were deliberately writing software so it wouldn't work on the others.
> If it wasn't worth your time creating it

Once something like Sora is available to the public, its going to be game over. A new bunch of creators will use it to "create" videos and I am sure you will change your mind then.
See https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=github.com/nanochess for discussions on other such amazing projects.
Cultures in most parts are rational when it comes not to eating specific things, when it comes to animals/insects it's mostly about parasites.
I'm not sure your implication. My understanding of the project is AMD didn't want to invest in it anymore.
I think it's funny that Woit manages to this day sound exactly like he's some sort of underdog fighting the big corp despite having lived to see the death of string theory.
> Why do we make things complicated?

Because we genuinely care more about how people perceive us ("am I acting normal?") than how we feel.

That's been engrained over generations, for most humans.
It would be a net benefit to employees, customers, industry and society to break up FAANGs and other multi hundred billion dollar companies.

These entities struggle to innovate past a certain size. That'd be fine by itself but their enormous size ends up suppressing competition as well.

Internally these organizations are rife with politics - brought on by players who've realized that it is much easier to succeed via intrigue than meaningfully improving the business of a company that makes over 50 billion a quarter.

Unfortunately our political system is at an all time low and having a few too big to fail entities is a much more attractive scenario for our leaders then hundreds of smaller and more vibrant companies.
Only one (dismissive) side note about self-driving in the article.

I have yet to hear a solid argument against Tesla achieving full self-driving within the next ten years.

Self-driving will automate billions of daily man hours.

Capturing even just a very small fraction of that value results in enough earnings to justify Tesla's current market cap. Even if you have to discount the earnings for another ten years, in case it takes so long to start selling FSD software.

Talking rationally about FSD always results in reflexive downvoting here on HN. Which I take as a sign, that the thinking about Tesla's future is muddied by emotions among many people. Maybe because people can't imagine fundamental change and also fear change.
> This could be a once-in-a-lifetime viewing opportunity as the nova ouburst [sic] only occurs about every 80 years.
AMDs graphics was an acquisition though (ATI), and I understand that the company culture of that division might still be quite different.
Could depend on how many planned ICE bans are postponed and by how long?
Wow the answers are bad. I can tell you for sure practice does nothing and can actually turn into confidence which can be read as arrogance. Researching the company is also a waste of time, it will maybe give you a 5% boost.

The reality is that people that do the hiring are usually workaholics, so they turned interviews into dating. The only way to get a job is if all the people involved like you outside the job.

So look into networking, nepotism and cronyism.
What these languages show, is something anyone used to compiled BASIC, Pascal dialects like Object Pascal, Modula-2 and such, already knew back in the day.

We had languages that were a pleasure to use for high level programming abstractions, while at the same time, provided the necessary features to go all the way down, even inline Assembly if it must be.

Without the culture that tooling much be hard, rather developers are users as well.

Thankfully a new generation of developers is bringing this culture back.
The "study" the article is based on is pretty laughable. It's nearly 100 pages of nothing but corpo-DEI-jargon. They never actually include any of the data that they're analyzing, they conveniently just "summarize" what we should think about the data. The few graphs that are included don't label all or any of the axes. Nearly 100 pages and no hard data. There's nothing scientific about this, it's just typical social propaganda / class warfare propaganda.
>Something that when the rest of someone's computer is slowing down, this can stay responsive.

Yeah so without having to overwrite some very deep OS settings, which will likely raise some red flags for your app requiring administrator privilege to run, you aren't going to get this. If someone has a browser thats taking up most resources, its gonna throttle everything.

There is generally very little reason to write anything but web apps these days for things that don't need to touch specific hardware. If you stick to as much native js/css/html as possible (i.e avoid large libraries), it will load blazingly fast and use way less resources then web apps that are considered fast.
To developers that cargo cult performance, that is.

I have always enabled bounds checking, and never ever, did it matter for the kind of projects I was involved with.

Not everyone is really writing a VR engine for a console rendering at 120 FPS, but just like everyone wants to be Google, so do much of those developers.