skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Of course you can just not do that, and then problem solved.

Historically there is some performance benefit of using a separate CDN, as browsers would share the cache. However modern browsers do not do that. I suppose in theory the CDN might be geo-distributed to be very close to your user, however it seems like the latency of opening a second connection (esp. In http/2
world) would likely outweigh that unless your web server is really bad.
> Lest you think is just one weird corner of the sql spec, I found this helpful diagram explaining how the scoping rules work (from Neumann and Leis, 2023)

It's an excellent diagram, it really conveys the dissonance. Incidentally I interviewed Viktor Leis on a podcast last week about the paper where it's from: https://juxt.pro/blog/sane-query-languages-podcast/

A lot of people seem to believe that LLMs or other ML methods can overcome the complexity challenges of generating SQL accurately, but I'm yet to be convinced that a database-powered AI revolution can happen without somehow bypassing SQL.
Well, I'm Glad Tim Berners-Lee knew what to do with his.
Decreasing marginal rate thresholds on UK income tax (like going from 60% at 125,139 to 40% at 125,140) is insane and leads to wacky optimisations like the following:

Suppose you predicably earn 150k a year. Taking 110k per year salary and putting 40k in your pension for four years results in less net income than:

* Taking 140k salary and 10k pension in year one

* Take 100k salary and 50k pension in years two, three, and four

In both cases you have taken 440k salary and put 160k in your pension. But in the first case you have paid highest tax rate of 60% tax rate on 40k and in the second case you paid the highest tax rate of 60% on only 12,570.

Since the annual pension allowance is now 60k per year, and you have a three year carry-forward to use unused pension allowance from previous years you can do this trick with quite a wide range of gross salaries. And you can use it for the 125,139 to 125,140 decreasing marginal rate, or the 59,999 to 60,000 decreasing marginal rate due loss of child benefit.
> Lisp traditionally has these features

Lisp has traditionally a two stage syntax

1) S-expressions

2) Lisp

S-Expression level has a syntax to describe data: lists, conses, numbers, symbols, strings, arrays, ...

Lisp syntax is defined on top of that, as s-expressions: variables, function calls, macro calls, special forms (using quote, let, if, progn, setq, catch, throw, labels, flet, declare, ...), lambda expressions. Each macro also can implement syntax.
That is not what the nonce attribute does (you are thinking of SRI, or maybe csp hash- sources)
I think the following isn't said often enough: there must be a reason why there are extremely few celebrities and artists who are cool with AI, and it cannot be something abstract and bureaucratic as copyright concerns although those are problematic.

It's just not there yet. GenAI outputs aren't something audiences wants to hang on a wall. It's something that evoke sense of distress. Otherwise everyone's tracing them at least.
Redis is the original project and it continues, even if the licence change is a bad move. Redict is a brand new fork, currently at the “rename everything” stage. It may or may not succeed at being the “new Redis”. The people behind “old Redis” probably consider this title misleading and possibly defaming their project. Many people may decide to create other forks (I expect OpenRedis from Amazon any second now).

(And I’m not a fan of Drew myself.)
Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy was first a radio show, then a book, then a TV series and finally a movie - and each one treats the source material differently (and 3 of them all involved the original creator).

People need to get over the idea of faithful adaptations for different media formats.
Something really nice about the typography?
Maybe also in local firefighters.
The site is down. Here's a backup
https://archive.is/qJ409
In the usual way, yes you are correct. I think the article is trying to present an alternative viewpoint, where the real Redis product is not the one that is still named "Redis" but the one that continues being opensource.

So it is a fork, but we might as well accept that what is currently named Redis will slowly (or quickly?) morph into something unrecognizable, what with the focus on generative AI and commercialization...
Those who fail to study history are doomed to make really bad investments.

Which leads me to promote the ICO for my new Federalist Reserve of America Under Trump token, for the discerning MAGA or MAGA-adjacent investor (or the incompetent relatives under their fiduciary care): Love the Donald? Love FRAUD!
Show HN: FXYT – Tiny, esoteric, stack-based, postfix, canvas colouring language
And now you understand why programmers need to be part of a Trade Union.

Protection from retaliation and group negotiation on working conditions are brilliant for people who aren't as "important" as Bill.
Tiktok is not censored in India as well. They just show that it is not available in your country due to government order.

Even without blocking, countries could ask to seize operation and block them from accepting payment effectively killing it.
Keep them locked in subterranean vaults of course.
Here it comes... the great dancer recession!
Exactly! But it's objectively a shit way of sharing code, there is no contributions possible, etc.
However, fixed inflation targets (with central bank using interest rates to control) are generally not that beneficial for that purpose, as the inflation is known ahead of time and would be priced in.

Inflating away your debt only works if you can increase the inflation to be more than what the person you borrowed from thought it would be.
You don’t need to pay to contribute to a project on SourceHut. But you must like the antiquated e-mail-based workflow.
Found it on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toSRmKKiosQ
We're not in the era of "the internet" anymore. It's a bunch of firewalled devolved internets that are entirely within a single corporation. For example if the US banned access to all Chinese websites I think that would be bad. However explicitly banning major Chinese companies from selling directly to US consumers with an intention to mislead them I think is beneficial.

Just pass a law of automatic recipricol action for any country. If any country bans "X category" then ban anything coming FROM that country with the same category. If China wants tiktok to operate in the US then they must allow twitter, facebook, and all of the other applications to operate within China. That's the entire point of globalism. It's not a one way street.
Cool. How are you finding clients?
Reminded me of Petals offering distributed ML inference anyone tried this?

https://github.com/bigscience-workshop/petals
A little more starkly, each dollar diverted from solar and wind to nukes and fossil fuels brings climate catastrophe nearer.
That’s an unusual stance.

Trade restrictions are usually levied reciprocally, and trade agreements made to enforce equal market access or even outcomes. (E.g. you can sell Japanese cars in the US if Japan makes those cars with US steel ).
They don't. However "advanced" they can't help but be a little naive.

https://pastebin.com/42dTemNe
Google might just be the biggest advocate of https out there, certainly (from my recollection) post Snowden. There has been a lot of progress made over the years.

https://transparencyreport.google.com/https/overview

https://transparencyreport.google.com/safer-email/overview - transmitting email with some form of encryption is probably a bigger and completely unseen problem that is similar
Did you ever get lots of cuts near the Adam's apple?
> This is funny because "recursion" and "condescension" are two words that rhyme...

"lol"? :(
Style yes, but I find it so hard to read.
URLs should definitely be encrypted.
The governments and banking system work hand-in-hand, and the Cantillon effect takes care of the rest
As if Apple would allow that…
VLC: App Stores Were a Mistake
That's nothing special of Lisp. Literal data structures means that one can write down data objects like list, arrays, vectors, numbers (floats, integers, rational, complex, ...), symbols, strings, characters, records/structures, ...

Common Lisp for example:

(berlin hamburg munich cologne) ; a list of symbols
#(berlin hamburg munich cologne) ; a vector of symbols
(1.3 1.3d6 13 #c(1 3) 1/3) ; a list of numbers
"Hello World!" ; a string
#\H ; the character H
#S(CITY :NAME BERLIN ; a structure (aka record) of type CITY
:COUNTRY GERMANY)
#*1010101111 ; a bitvector
#2A((BERLIN GERMANY) ; a 2d array
(PARIS FRANCE))

Other programming languages have their own syntax for literal data (even data structures like unicode characters, hash tables, unicode strings, decimal numbers, ...)
Common Lisp OTOH has an extensible reader, one can add new syntax extensions for data structures, using so-called reader macros. READ is the function to read s-expressions from text streams. It returns data objects.
QKD is not battle-tested. Like RSA, a naive textbook implementation would be worthless: messy physical implementations will leak information through side-channels.

If quantum cryptography is the solution, it won't arrive immediately, or for free.
The Mirage F1 went to Mach 1.15 on its first flight in 1969. It wasn't unusual in that era.
Some artists had very long chains, n >= 8 between them. But a lot of artists either never collaborate at all, or only collaborate with a specific group of people. Usually that group of people is a very niche sub-sub-genre of music, like bubblegum phonk.

That being said, this was an analysis of my own library, and I didn't grab the entire discography of every artist.
Perhaps this is part of the "gig culture", do side projects have to generate a profit? If you feel overwhelmed, opening development up for others (as in, open sourcing it with whatever license you feel is appropiate) might just be what you're looking for. If the app is appreciated by a community, it will become practically self-promoting within whatever niche you've placed yourself in.
But isn't that money multiplier due to fractional-reserve banking essentially a one-shot deal, and doesn't continue to expand over long time periods?

So if banks keep 10% in reserves, then a cash deposit gets multiplied by 1/.1 = 10 times, and that factor does not grow with time. Even if there were no law against continually lowering reserve ratios (and therefore increasing this multiplier), the market would tend to create a bound, for otherwise the bank would have greater risk of collapse from runs and unexpected loan defaults.

By contrast, if the central bank (Fed) keeps increasing its balance sheet (by buying assets using money it created from thin air), we have continual growth in the money supply (since the folks who sold the assets have new money in their accounts, granted magically by the central bank).

In fact, if we had a law that banned fractional-reserve banking for all commercial banks, so that all commercial banks had to have 100% / full reserves, eliminating your dilution, the central bank could still perform open market operations and buy assets with printed money, and thereby continue to increase the money supply. Full reserve for private/commercial banks is still compatible with money printing by a central bank.

So I know fractional-reserve gets a lot of heat by sound money folks, but the continual inflation observed since the 70s is not primarily a fractional-reserve problem, but a central bank money printing problem.
Even the US views certain content as illegal, so I'd say that right you stipulate is already limited.
(offtopic warning)

> A properly normalised database can wind up with a lot of small tables connected by a complex network of foreign key references

I think the last time I properly normalized a database was at a university. Avoidng lots of small tables and complex networks would be the main reason.
People are wasting time on stupid content... Why don't you see it's killing American society? Algos are made to make Wests stupid. Like drugs.
I've set this up for my parents, they have a small bed and breakfast in the countryside, and they love it. It's much more responsive then their past WordPress install when editing, because their desktop is faster than a cheap PHP hosting. Some things are needlessly complicated in publii though, I'd like to make a more minimal version one day
…no, it was definitely “HTTPS added/removed here”
Open Interpreter lets LLMs run code on your computer to complete tasks
A useful trick that I've been doing for a few years is having a folder with qr code images on my homescreen. Whenever somebody asks me for my linkedin, my phone number, or the wifi access to our office, I just pop out the QR code for that and show it to them on my phone. They scan it and job done.

I started doing this around the time IOS added QR code support to their camera app (six years ago or so). Very fun to watch iphone owners heads explode that were expecting to go through a tedious ritual of typing out a phone number or email address. Still happens occasionally. People are used to awkward and tedious rituals for exchanging contact details and this is the complete opposite.

Very simple to do and very practical. Most phones have QR code support built into their default camera apps now. You don't need any special apps for this. So, there's very little friction with this. Mostly it's just people being unaware that they can do this. There are gazillions of websites where you can create QR codes for web links, vcards, wifi credentials, etc. That part is easy. All you need to do is create a QR code and save it to some location where you can access it from your phone easily and show it to people.

I use Google drive for this but it's pretty easy to find alternatives to that.
The 'but then we're as bad as ..' argument will be presented, and maybe a reference to the Paradox of Tolerance (aka the Popper Paradox).

I read a nice(r) interpretation of the paradox a while ago - loosely the claim was made that it's not an ethical standard that you (your nation state, etc) have to apply to yourself in order to maintain a moral high-ground, but works better once you think of it as a social contract.

That is, if someone / another nation state is not willing to follow the same basic rule, then they don't get the benefit of it.
Exactly how is cryptocurrency merely a "money laundering scheme"?
Why do all css frameworks and design systems hate text inputs so much?

Here: Instead of using common sense Google ended up doing a user study with 800 participants to arrive at the conclusion that text inputs must look like text inputs https://medium.com/google-design/the-evolution-of-material-d...
If you are rich and own multiple houses or other expensive assets, they appreciate even faster during times of high inflation…compare that to a young working class couple hoping to someday buy their first house which continually gets farther out of reach…which ones are most hurt by inflation?
The font is fine, it's the line-height that is wrong: the text is a bit too squished
Firms can do uniform pay cuts (say 2%) instead of targeted layoffs. That way all employees are in it together, and yet there's still market discipline in whether to cut.
This, but unironically. You're asking for some solution to a problem you shouldn't have. Keeping shitty photos is hoarding and making your life worse. Hit that delete button.
Yeah, with todays bloated websites, this few KBs don't really matter at all. Where do you even find a webpage today who is "just" 2MB.
>Free access to the entire internet is a right Americans have always enjoyed.

Unless you're freeloading off of public and open wifi networks, every single person in America is paying someone (who reserves the right to refuse service to anyone) for the privilege of accessing the internet.
My understanding of mass surveillance is, that masses are surveilled. :) But here its a court, that allows extracting log data for a specific case and it happened after the fact.

I make a difference between leaving loggable traces of living (which we leave all the time, no matter what) and sometimes filtering to recapture the past.
> cue presstv.com
That is the challenging part indeed.

But if we think of mixture of experts models outperforming "monolithic" models, why not? Maybe instead of 8 you can do 1000 and that is easy to paralellize. It sounds worth exploring to me.
I live in one. You're talking nonsense.

That 30GB plan is more than some people with phones earn here
Interesting thoughts on using axis lines only when the relative comparison is meaningful, though I don’t think the downsides to superfluously adding them outweigh the other design benefits like providing clear bounds and a visual anchor to attach tick marks to. The article seems a bit objectivist but I think the right tradeoffs depend on the context as well as the data
I think in this case the celebs are getting paid for using their likeness.
What's with these weirdly convoluted re-spellings of Arabic/Muslim names to make them look not Arabic/Muslim?
You can do this a little bit easier using SQLPage [1], without GraphViz, and you'll get an always up to date schema:

select 'table' as component, 'Foreign keys' as markdown;

select *, (
select
group_concat(
printf('[%s.%s](?table=%s)', fk."table",fk."to",fk."table"),
', '
)
from pragma_foreign_key_list($table) fk
where col.name = fk."from"
) as "Foreign keys"
from pragma_table_info($table) col;

[1] https://sql.ophir.dev (https://github.com/lovasoa/SQLpage#sqlpage)
Probably, if those are the two options. But it still feels disingenuous to lean on the privacy angle as hard as many of them do.

Just call it what it is. We're just a wrapper around gpt4, so the treatment of your data is subject to OpenAI's privacy policies and while we'll try to keep you informed of any changes you should be aware of that major dependency.
Do you think family homes had a lower percentage of drunkards back in 1946 when marriage was more common?
Interestingly, this very question was asked and addressed here on HN 32 days ago:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39428141
You're delusional if you think the landscape 10 years ago is the same now. Companies are much less likely to simply capitulate to governments now. In fact, the references you make here are why they're less likely to allow these kinds of things.

It looks really bad for them, and it affects their bottom line when these things come out. When public trust in your service is crucial to its existence, you can spend more on lawyers to fight the government about it.
At this point I think I'm leaning towards "organic brains are just next token predictors with impressive secondary heuristic systems".

The fact that we can get such impressive results from transformers which are such a poor approximation and completely stateless makes me think there really isn't any special sauce to it.
Good argument, I've mostly come around to your view. The little "but" that I still see is that the current file formats don't let you omit fields you don't want to pass on, and most decoders don't let you omit fields you don't want to interpret/use while unpacking.

Even if a given decoder could, though, most users wouldn't be able to use that and so they'd get files from 1970 or 1980 if I don't want to pass that on and set it to zeroes, so better is if the field can be omitted (as in, if the header wasn't fixed length but extensible like an IP packet). So I'd still like a "better" archiving format than the ones we have today (though I'm not familiar with the internals of every one of them, like 7z or the mentioned squashfs so tell me if this already exists), but I agree such a format should just support everything ~every filesystem supports
The paper is behind a Molecular Cell subscription or single-access fee.

Searching for the paper on Google Scholar yields a link to the preprint on bioRxiv:

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.08.10.552792v2....
Yes, by me - thank you for looping that discussion back in.

It was meant to be rhetorical now - as the USSR did not have TV or radio stations in the US (but, yes, you could get USSR newspapers). Differentiating between different "attack vectors" isn't new.
Obviously, you don't know much about folks that use drugs.

Sure, some people will act dumb when they are addicted. For so many others, you can't tell and you've never been able to - and these folks are peppered throughout society. Most aren't addicted.

Which basically means that I can dismiss the comparison, unless you meant that for most folks, it's not an issue.
How is search working for you? I unfortunately find it to be lacking the ability to filter anything and open the results in their own view, making it not nearly as useful as it could be for me.
I'm thinking of starting a social club for people who have been accused of being an AI on HN. We can have secret meetings, and ice cream on Thursdays ...
Nice finding and makes a lot of sense! It is somewhat related to classification heads using their own weighted representation of all transformer layer outputs.

I only glanced the paper, but they don't seem to softmax ⍺_i for normalization?
How is it possible to view the future?
I can select March 2025 in the date field, are you a fortune teller?
Of course westerner-lovers prefer an alliance with US over China; they profit from it. It's easier to empty the pockets of Argentinians when they think of you as a trustworthy friend.

Also regarding the healthy imposed dose of american capitalism: its funny how liberals/right wingers in the western world love to praise national sovereignty, but as soon as it is people outside of the western bubble who dream of national sovereignty, then suddenly its very bad and those dirty people should simply serve their European or American overlords without asking questions.
You can still use RAD Studio today. Although it's expensive and it's primarily used to maintain old software these days.

Lazarus is the best IDE for Pascal, being completely free, open source and cross platform.
> I don’t understand how there hasn’t been more innovation in this space

I think it's simply that most businesses and investors don't register SQL as having any real problems, and especially now with a resurgent interest in SQL the idea of attempting anything novel feels too risky.

Shameless plug of one recent attempt to offer something different: XTQL https://docs.xtdb.com/intro/what-is-xtql.html
There's a difference between the officially stated reason and the real one. The government still tries to keep up the pretence of a functional democracy, so it can't outright say they are banning things that they don't like.

You're free to buy the party line but at least question whether the reasoning makes any sense. Does banning a handful of apps while increasing Chinese investments and imports really aling with the official stand that this was a retaliatory action?
There is a distinction I tend to make here.

If some person was able to pick me out from a lineup because they physically saw me then that wasn't private and privacy laws don't apply.

So for instance capturing my face on CCTV in a public place isn't a privacy violation, same with my license plate in a pulic place.

However what happens on my private property is a privacy violation if it is recorded without consent.

Certian information isn't private, and that being stored is fine. Where the line gets drawn is what's up for debate.

I surely would want my contact details and name saved by a company that I intend to do business with in either direction. However if they spam me with information I should be able to lodge an harrassment claim against them. It's not a privacy issue but a decency issue.
Considering I've been applying for hundreds of jobs in the past few months, I think I'd Rather hear nothing if I never actually spoke to a person.
Arvind Kejriwal: Delhi chief minister remanded to custody in corruption case