skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think you're deliberately avoiding what I am saying, which is "price controls" and pretending that I am saying "regulation". Those are completely different concepts.

The article itself is showing exactly what happens when you have price controls - supply dries up and the market falls apart.
> The first time I googled this random noise-during-noise, I panicked. Apparently hearing things that aren’t there is referred to in the psych biz as auditory pareidolia, or auditory hallucinations, and is a hallmark of schizophrenia—and some experts say it requires a psychological check-up.

I feel like it's important to note here that something like 1 in 100 people hears voices without schizophrenia, it's kinda quite common. I'm one of them. Paragraphs like this don't help with people's perception of this phenomenon though.
> Crazy that a new aircraft is launching with such new tech, but still rocking engines that were fundamentally designed around 10 years after the dawn of jet aircraft.

Their goal is to prove the design's aerodynamics WRT sonic boom, not the engines.
I wonder how common this is. I've never experienced it, or heard anyone else ever mention it was a thing so I assume it's not very common. No mention in the article about it but that could just be because no one knows.
I've seen a16z on twitter and o11y a few times in programming chatrooms of various sorts.

But mostly only the same four as you.
Considering GPT can do programming and logic to some level, I assume it has has training of that sort? It can seem to do logic even on some completely made up abstract notions. For example "Consider a jumajambi has 2 jimimis. Each jimijimi is a jomololo or a joobajooba. How many possible variations of jumajambi are there if there are 4 jumajambi?".

People keep calling it "next next token predictors", but clearly there is something more going on and I would love for someone to give a simple explanation.
I had the same question. I guess too is a common protocol. Any insights on why these flights are gears down?
Why should we make it more efficient? Why not make more energy from clean sources first?
> It’s a Google naming convention.

i18n was coined by Digital Equipment Corporation in the 1970s or 1980s. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationalization_and_local...

https://www.accessibility.com/glossary/a11y claims that this was initially a joke, which explains a lot.
None of this is wrong, but this is mostly an advertisement for QA Wolf.
Paying taxes is (mostly) fine. Filing taxes sucks. Politicians don't understand that making the filing process suck won't change how I feel about paying taxes. It will change how I feel about them.
Pretty much everything we use daily were introduced to "regular people" as a luxury product for the 0.1%. Even personal computers

Eventually companies are able to scale things
We don't know that they did. It takes satellites to get a representative measure of ocean temperatures worldwide. There's some noisy data from ships dipping mercury thermometers into the oceans, but this was hardly a widespread practice.
Great idea -- we're looking at showing workflow history and this is a good addition.
From the marketing fluff,

"Supersonic intakes: XB-1’s engine intakes slow supersonic air to subsonic speeds, efficiently converting kinetic energy into pressure energy, allowing conventional jet engines to power XB-1 from takeoff through supersonic flight."

I'm under the impression that's something most jet engines do.
Thanks for sharing, I've needed this for years and never stumbled across it.
The American Get-Diabetes Association
Great point! Multi-lingual is entirely possible and something that we want to implement; luckily all the chat stuff already works great because of LLMs, and we'll try to ship multi-lingual UI elements fast as well.
This project is making incredible progress. And Chubot (the project lead) has an encyclopedic knowledge of weird bash trivia.
Apple says it spent three years trying to bring Apple Watch to Android
That's speculatory, and furthermore I'd argue Apple is already failing to compete if their only competitive tactic is lock-in. Apple's anticompetitive behavior may well be the last thing stopping a browser monopoly. That's for the free market to decide though, and it's an entirely different lawsuit in the making.
I recently came up with a new way to bookmark with Logseq and Raindrop that I like a lot -- https://reticulated.net/posts/a-better-bookmark-experience-w...
I've been using Emacs continuously for almost three decades, 99.9999% of the time text-only (whether Linux console, X terminal console, xterm, or SSH client) on a remote server. My email client is VM, written in Emacs Lisp. I've used it to read mail for almost as long as I've used Emacs.

VM (and ancillary tools, like Personality Crisis and mairix)

* does a great of job displaying HTML messages with Emacs's integrated W3M browser engine. For the very few that it doesn't, one keystroke sends the message to my web browser running locally.

* sends URLs I select (all from the keyboard) to the web browser (it doesn't use the add-number method; rather, W3M's built-in navigation keystrokes are available, including Tab and Shift-Tab for moving between links)

* opens images and attachments

* auto-adjusts the From: line of outgoing messages depending on the recipient

* archives messages to various folders using various criteria

* searches my archived mail at lightning speed

Of course, I can write Emacs Lisp code of my own to extend any or all of the above.

VM isn't perfect but, overall, I really feel like I have a superpower for email handling with it.
For a long time I wanted to figure out a way to organize my "bookmarks" that I have scattered all over the place. I have many many favorited posts on HN, I used Reddit's "save" feature, I add videos to "watch later" or some other playlist in Youtube, etc etc. I thought maybe I could one day unify all this into one place where I can tag them so I know why I bookmarked them (I have definitely sifted through pages of my HN favorites trying to find something). At this point though, I have too much to go through that the task seems daunting. But now that we have AI, I have shifted my mindset to wanting to just feed everything to AI and just have a chat interface where I can ask it for what I want. I feel like that is the future of organization (at least for me it is). Ideally it would be something self-hosted
Microvm.nix with cloud-hypervisor
> And further I know evolutionism is the same.

You're dead wrong about this.
You need to get windows 11 pro. the home versions or anything less than pro is subsidized by ads.
Not wanting to be negative too, but I’ve used debuggers like gdb, the ones in JetBrains’s IDEs, XCode’s, and every time it’s not lack of information that’s stopping me from solving the issue. Coding common lisp with sly and emacs or smalltalk with pharo is much entertaining than chatting with an LLM. Coding with a good debugger is very close to that (even the one inside the browser for JavaScript). I think we can design better tools than hook everything to a LLM that requires 128gb of ram to run locally.
I appreciate that, but I prefer pay someone else to keep the server up
This is their 1/3-scale test/demo airplane. Spending big on engines for it would not make sense.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boom_XB-1
I've worked at a small place with "radical candor" (it's a book) and how I think about it is like working with power tools while walking on a tightrope. It's really easy to screw up and cut off someone's hand, and I think bridgewater fires a lot AFAIK or has a lot of turn over as a result.

Another thing is that it can easily make people pretty defensive, and you need very mature and forgiving/accepting people or rough and tumble culture (think Linus Torvalds) for it work properly. It's very easy to hide emotions with intellectual rationalizations unfortunately.

I also think it can be very useful and push to excellence, but most IMO don't have the emotional maturity to pull it off properly. I think it's the same reason why a lot of startups die because of cofounder conflict.
> many of which are short enough that they really should be trains

That's a good point, but rail infrastructure is very expensive to build and, unlike planes, where you only need to build the destinations, you need to build every route.

Anyway, the future of short commuter flights is electric.
It might work someday, maybe. But it won't work now. The corpsicles which currently exist are just as dead as if they were cremated. I understand, sort of, the psychology of people who lie to themselves about this, but that's all that's happening.
I loved the idea of Logseq, but as of this writing, "logseq data loss ${year}" still shows people losing large numbers of notes on a regular basis. I don't trust it with my information.
They are making air travel more efficient. More time efficient. That's great for everyone flying, but also great for airlines. The last three flights I've been on arrived significantly ahead of schedule and were going much faster than usual. I assume this was to get the pilot to the location ASAP so they can fly again sooner.

Also how do you not see supersonic flight as just generally good for everyone flying? I want to sit in a plane for less time, always.
Fair point, I was thinking about "cargo traffic only" as in the original though experiment.

Coaches with a dedicated luggage section would quite possibly help as well, and it occurs to me that you could have a train with baggage cars ... but having never had to travel with more than one small child I can't say how acceptable those options would be to parents in general.
Why do people even submit nytimes links when the article is completely unavailable? Can anyone actually read it or are we just supposed to debate about a vague headline?
That reminds me of the old “bump key” vuln in physical locks with tumblers
Hmm:

> Ukraine denies US requested to halt strikes on Russian oil refineries

https://newsukraine.rbc.ua/news/ukraine-denies-us-requested-...
> Until we have the same rigor in self-driving

I think automated robotic self-driving will always need a human-in-the-loop as ironic as that sounds, but for 99.9% of an automated journey, the extra 0.1% needs to be offloaded to humans, for rare edge-cases where the self-driving vehicle has no training data for. For example, random events like road maintenance, wild animals crossing the road, natural events like snow storms, etc.

The people working on this 0.1% metric want to further reduce this percentage and get all the automation to 100%, but you will need humans at some stage. Nature is too random and chaotic for it all to be modeled in a computer system.
Thanks! And 100%, this is something we'd love to do with upmarket businesses. We have primitives for integrating raw API calls into the workflow layer as well as ingesting documentation to create dynamic "blocks" per-business, so it's fully possible and a really cool use case. Definitely agree though -- it's hard to get right.
This will never make it past prototype stages, unfortunately. Realistically, you need federal involvement to make something like this happen, a la concorde. I could see the US government getting involved for nationalism purposes if China starts actually building jets in large numbers to reassert US manufacturing supremacy.

It was sexy marketing for the Concorde to travel between NYC and Paris/London back in the 70s-90s. Today however, with the emergence of the middle east as a major travel hub, would supersonic travel be viable there? Dubai-Singapore? Dubai-Doha? Dubai-Moscow? Europe to Middle east wouldn't work due to having to fly over europe, right?

Also, is there enough luxury/high speed travel demand between asia and the north american west coast for something like this? It's nice to leave north america in the evening, sleep 8 hours, and arrive as the plane is landing in tokyo. Is there any demand to be get to Tokyo in 6-7ish hours?

It seems like the people that can afford 20-30k tickets can also afford to fly private, and with the internet there's much less need to be in person for making deals. Sadly, until fuel costs become negligible and they can make supersonic airplanes hold 200+ people, i think most people would rather fly private or fly first class on an A380 than on a cramped Overture.
Imitation learning of discretionary traders who rely on a mixture of rules and intuition.
It varies significantly depending on the company based on my experience. At my current place, I wouldn't be surprised if Macs were the default type of computer for most staff, and even the execs probably used them as a result. At the job before that it was majority Windows PCs, for both management and developers.

And it's been that way in all of them. Some have mostly Windows PCs for everyone, some have Macs for everyone, occasionally you'll see the odd person using the other kind of machine if they're really picky/need it (lots of the time, it's the designer being the only one with a Mac in a Windows only company).

Don't think I ever saw someone use Linux as an OS outside of server management.
> While I acknowledge the cool factor, I don't like what Boom is doing. We should be looking at making air travel more efficient, reducing the energy/emissions per passenger-mile flown. We don't need to invent ways to make luxury travel by the rarified few ever more expensive and damaging.

Didn't they say it could run on sustainable fuel?

I'm sorry, but I want to maximize my (and really all humans) time on this Earth, if that costs energy, that's the cost. I wouldn't be concerned about emissions per passenger-mile as that's nothing more than a rounding error in "emissions". You're welcome to walk / swim from San Francisco to Europe, but don't expect me to.
As mentioned in other replies, this doesn't fully solve a lot of the cases. I think z order curves might actually be better here, they are slightly less accurate individually, but in a way that would seemingly minimize the worst case results when taking the minimum of the two. But at that point you are probably better off using a single z-order curve and using the coordinates to check the manhattan or Chebyshev distance using bitwise operations.
SAF is a good investment - it allows us to use the current airplanes while we transition the shorter distances to electrics. It also allows for a gradual infrastructure transition, because you can run a jet engine with any mix of kerosene and SAF.
NASA is working on designs to significantly reduce noise from breaking the sound barrier, which I'm sure will inform changing requirements for supersonic flight over the United States. Right now the regulation is a very strict "you cannot fly supersonic over the US", except military aircraft of course
Personally I've ready about the case elsewhere so I have the context. Others have subscriptions. Others use archive sites.
There's no "we" here. You're not a part of Boom, and I daresay you aren't working to make commercial air travel more efficient either. You're kibitzing.
Yeah, let's get rid of one of the most effective sources of green energy that works around the clock! The environmental concerns around dams are legitimate, but they need to be balanced against the consequences of how those energy sources will be replaced. There are also mitigation strategies that can be done instead, like the fish ladders that were mentioned in passing, to help mitigate the environmental impact.

Edit: I see climate change isn't even mentioned which is an enormous red flag when talking about hydro power.
Also when earthquake articles make no mention of the magnitude of them. 2000 magnitude 1 quakes is way, way different than just a few magnitude 5 quakes.
And yet all aviation combined is responsible for less than 3% of total carbon emissions. Permanently grounding all aircraft will make no appreciable difference. All the major manufacturers are currently sold out for the next decade; even if there were an additional major surge in demand for air travel enough to impact this number, it would be impossible to fulfill it.
No news is bad news
And yet, people with money keep throwing it at these ideas.

Imo this is just an easy way to get grants from nonprofits
My guess is that it enforces a kind of sparsity constraint.
I completely agree with what you wrote.

One addition, if I may, is that I have found that handwriting my notes first, then typing them later to be far more beneficial than just typing the notes from the start.

I take most of my notes by hand, not for some kind of additive memory bonus, but more so that I can work things out by hand i.e. learn the material. Pen and paper do not have notifications, do not vibrate, and do not tempt me to get distracted.

The typed notes are for referential usage, and then I can use things like tags and whatnot because digital notes are 'finalized' which I find easier to organize, format, etc.. But hey, that could be a "just me" thing.
I decided to downsize my life by selling a relatively expensive car and my condo and see how long I can go without working.

I have no desire to go back to frontend development even though I can make way more doing that than anything else.

I'm hoping in a year or so I'll be ready to get back into tech, but right now I have no desire to. So much of the industry just seems toxic to my mental health.
...which was written by author Harlan Ellison, also notable for the Star Trek (TOS) episode known as "The City on the Edge of Forever."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Boy_and_His_Dog

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harlan_Ellison

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_City_on_the_Edge_of_Foreve...
They beat Lockheed's X-59 to first flight. That was rolled out on January 12th, but it hasn't flown yet.

There are enough billionaires now to support making supersonic bizjets.
They will mostly be a status cymbal.
I tried it and doesn't work at all. Good luck folks!
That's what sustainable air fuel is. There is a lot being done to certify existing engines to run on it. Moving to an incompatible power source (such as hydrogen) isn't feasible because it would require scrapping the current fleets (and well maintained planes live longer than their pilots).
https://archive.is/SHcCU
Not an expert, but I've seen the following commented on other test flight videos: on initial test flights, landing gear is always kept down to minimize risk. If a sudden landing is needed, gear is already down, no risk of equipment getting stuck, less mental load for the pilot to perform emergency landing, etc. Basically, when testing, you want to minimize the variables being tested. When airworthyness is validated, then you can test landing gear systems.
https://archive.ph/wip/G7FFT
I use mu4e in Emacs as my mail client, along with org-msg and org-mode, and there's nothing better:

* Compose emails in org-mode markup (like Markdown but better) and auto-generate plain-text and HTML email on export, complete with syntax highlighting for code snippets

* Use your favorite text editor's keybindings to compose email: emacs, evil-mode (vim-style), meow (kakoune-style)

* Lightning-fast local search, offline sync with no Internet connection necessary

* Saved searches and bookmarks which allow for fast handling of mail based on given patterns

* Capture emails with org-capture and turn into todo items, links, notes, or reminders

* Tight integration of your mail system with your note taking system, your personal knowledge base, bibliographic manager, and so on (everything in emacs)

* Scriptability which can automate the boring stuff, like composing greetings ("Dear so-and-so,"), context-dependent signatures, and the like.
Stock prices change continuously based on the current price and future events that have not happened. I don't think they are at all predictable.
I too wonder.
I had a 1040stf back in the days, and waited for the falcon 030 to happen. Amiga, i386, etc happened - I eventually switched to pc before the falcon happened.

It sounds a bit cheesy , but I was much younger back then, and it felt like my team had let me down.

Computer wars ! Sounds silly now.
There is no other definition of London, the city. There's the Greater London region, which is 9m people, but that's it.

Parliament, for example, is in the City of Westminster, one of 32 boroughs which (+ the City) make up Greater London.
Full article via Archive:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240322092149/https://www.nytim...
I love the UX and the concept. Will likely sign up as a customer.

FYI: In good faith, I asked some simple javascript questions and stuff like "who is michael jordan" and got answers from the LLM. Perhaps adding some additional guardrails to ensure queries are workflow based could save you some tokens.

Great work!
I bet throttled since PICO8 does that https://pico-8.fandom.com/wiki/CPU
http://archive.today/frEUS
"But, instead of chickenpox, lab testing showed that some of the patients were actually infected with an enterovirus, which can cause a rash, or the herpes simplex virus 1, which causes cold sores."

I am consistently dumbfounded by the inadequate capabilities of our healthcare system to diagnose and detect viruses. Why aren't there simple tests available on Amazon to tell you what virus (or bacteria) is making you sick? For example, things like norovirus or the flu. Even at the doctor, the diagnostics available are slow, expensive and often the wrong ones. It often feels like machinery of another well-protected industry is at work.
I guess I'm confused. Apple says it can't because of a technical issue. Is it bluetooth? I know some android phones have issues with bluetooth devices like GoPros, the Pixel line in particular. That said if Samsung was able to get their Gear watches (which I don't think they support iOS anymore) to work, then I only see this as a big excuse. I have a feeling it was more of a privacy issue?
Exposes Twitter/X Direct Messaging System
Just finish building a tool:

-Go to the site

1. sign in with twitter

2. just type out intended twitter username and your secret messages

3. and it generates a link and share it on twitter by tagging intended user

4. and when the intended user click on link it will do twitter authentication check to have access that secret message

5. when other thn intended user click it says 'you are not authorized to have access'

tweets: https://ibb.co/Jmpch3Z

msg: https://ibb.co/RNZdtSS

unauthorized msg: https://ibb.co/SmFZ9Rm

roast me!
Several Redis maintainers and contributors moved to development here, https://github.com/madolson/placeholderkv. KeyDB is not bad though, it's an older fork that isn't very widely adopted.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyKtxsdI0z8 but even they're using relatively old engines as the starting point. Because they're simple and well understood.
Mozilla fixes two Firefox zero-day bugs exploited at Pwn2Own
If the question is asked multiple times, why wouldn't they answer it multiple times?
Great job, I intend to reproduce this on a similar dataset I've been collecting!

I will say, it would be great to see the color labeling done on domain url alone, to see how much of the topography of the map is driven simply by the different formatting characteristics of the websites you're gathering data from.
The 90s is not the 20s.
Omg hey! Good advice.

The one bit I don't understand is:

> I didn't understand why people would do that, and neither why they decide to have "fun" being a bully online and lying about things that never happened.

Like, do you have an autism diagnosis or something? You're claiming mystification at a basic, rudimentary feature of human behavior. It's like not understanding humor or something.
That's the whole point of a startup. And we know startups fail. And Zapier is a YC company. This is a 2 person team using LLMs, I doubt they are building their own, nor building some "foundational connect-the-internet" agent nor have built for any scale beyond an internship. Still, they are definitely going to make something, and good luck to them.