skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Hopefully this is clearer?

A bit. You seem to be talking about a thought experiment involving theoretical societal improvements and an omniscient oracle. I'm talking about real countries and parties and political movements that care about democracy generally being aware that an educated electorate is vital for a well-functioning democracy, while dictators and people looking for a more restrictive and dogmatic society are generally aware that certain ideas and knowledge are a threat to their rules or their ideas about society.

Of course there's a contradiction in there, and one that many people today are struggling with: the ideas that promote that restrictive/dogmatic society could themselves be a threat to an open democratic society. Should we allow those ideas and risk our open democratic society, or should we restrict them and thereby become less open and democratic? What happens if people vote against democracy? Which is essentially the same question as: does freedom and bodily autonomy mean you can sell yourself into slavery? Popper's paradox of tolerance also feels related, although that's easier to resolve.

But anyway, I think it's pretty clear we're talking about completely different issues.
Looks like MSW is just a network override, how is that comparable?
I guess, it's about things like UserGate, they generate MITM certificates on the fly and decrypt traffic. On the other hand, if they can't handle http1, why they would handle http2?
It is a stretch to call Blender a CAD. What I think distinguishes parametric CADs is that in Blender you edit the body while in CAD you edit a set of operations that produce the body. This sequence is then processed by geometric modelling kernel to produce the end result. Editing and rendering is the easier part of it.

Sketcher mentioned is probably letting you create dimension accurate objects by hand, but it is far from being a proper CAD.
I find it interesting/worrying that we specifically rule out drinks/liquids etc. in DCs or around any critical or even non-critical infrastructure, but it's perfectly acceptable to take drinks into a flight deck?
>If Palestine could end its attacks on Israel, almost all international support for Israel would dry up within 6 months.

That's a blatant lie and you know it. Since Israel can murder 14K+ children and still receive support as we are witnessing, your proposed strategy most certainly will not yield the claimed results.

>Hamas will never be that partner in peace for Israel.

So why did Israel finance and support Hamas? That's because Israel had never any real interest in peace, it's a settler colonial project which wants all of the land with ideally no Palestinians in it, for which there is more than enough evidence.

>Egypt and Jordan both managed to fight with Israel and come to a lasting peace, and I feel like insisting that Palestinians are incapable of the same robs them of any agency.

The framing of this is just outright laughable. Israel holds all of the power and thus bears the prime responsibility.

>I of course give Israel the same accountability. The settlements are unjustifiable. The response to Oct 7 needs a huge amount of investigation in order ensure all has been done to minimise civilian casualties.

I'm not even going to entertain this utter dishonesty for a second. They've murdered 14K+ children, you can keep roleplaying as hard as you want but anyone who has seen a fraction of the evidence knows that there is plenty of genocidal intent documented by south africa's ICJ documents and they acted upon that.

>The same way Palestine needs to stop firing rockets for a lasting peace to be possible, Israel will likely need to take a couple terrorist attacks on the chin once a feasible partner for peace in Palestine has been found.

You are confusing cause & effect, but you already know that. The rockets are being fired because Israel has brutally oppressed, murdered and ethnically cleansed Palestinians for 75+ years with near impunity. Give me a break with your soft zionist BS manipulation.
I agree that's absolutely a possibility. Also not a Canadian. But I will point out that superficially there doesn't seem to be opposition to development on the land. The opposition appears to be based on what is being built rather than where.
I'm not sure you understand my question. I don't see from the quote that there is any concern. Where are you drawing that from?
Proving that this isn't pure chance is impossible.
Not proven, but illustrated, in number of cases.
Is there anything that isn't go?
It turns out only certain states allows for deleting like California
Talented team that keeps shipping!
If you're using a hypervisor, then the userspace program inside the VM is also using the CPU and memory directly. You'd have to do full emulation to avoid that.

Even with full emulation, I'd say memory is being accessed directly, unless you really go out of your way to make it weird.
Bird flu: access to Ernest Shackleton's grave 'blocked by dead seals'
I especially enjoyed his work in Honan the Librarian and Discriminator 2.
US rancher used tissue and testicles to breed 'giant' sheep to sell for hunting
Hey, random question.

Is there a technical reason why log probs aren't available when using function calling? It's not a problem, I've already found a workaround. I was just curious haha.

In general I feel like the function calling/tool use is a bit cumbersome and restrictive so I prefer to write the typescript in the functions namespace myself and just use json_mode.
Tapeworms found in brain of US man who ate undercooked bacon
Noyb.eu is right here, the (extreme lack of) privacy laws in Sweden is out of tune with modern technology, and the fact that you can pretend to be a journalistic endeavor compounds it.

Moreover, this situation by extension could threaten the vital protection that (real) journalists must have, like protection against having to disclose their sources etc. That is, if the law is misused in this way, someone will surely get the bright idea that the law must be thrown out in its entirety.
It's a request the front-end developer should be confronted with, not OpenAI.

The website could as well buffer the incoming stream until the used clicks an area to request the display of the next block of the response, once he has finished reading the initial sentences.
Hacker News is probably the most moderated site I use. Even more than reddit. And it is probably that much better for it.
This is absolutely appalling. I can't believe such blatant violation of privacy and human rights is happening in Sweden.
There's a lot of options for self-hostable wikis if that's what you're looking for. Decentralized has been done as well here: https://ipfs.kiwix.org/
You don't query for it; you don't override. Either the setting is custom and desired, or it's default and it hasn't been adjusted because it's fine.
You can run a heat pump with the electricity. That changed the calculation a bit.
In well-controlled studies, primarily via developmentally delayed children ingesting more dust/dirt. It's also worth pointing out that actual lead poisoning occurs at levels above about 60 mcg/dL, is very rare nowadays, and that the lead-IQ curve actually regresses toward the mean once you approach that sort of extreme lead level.
iirc, ids are indexed - that is, when you select an #id, the engine picks the element directly out of the DOM. It’s the fastest / most performant way to select an element, because it has the smallest pool of possible nodes to evaluate to match the id provided.

If you use an attribute selector, the engine must search through every single node in the DOM in order to return matches - an incredibly costly operation by comparison.

(Disclaimer, there may well be optimizations I’m not aware of at this point, but I’m pretty sure that’s why ids are generally preferred as a rule of thumb)
Yes, that is perfectly acceptable. Pilots can't be expected to go without anything to drink on long flights.
It's not about complexity in the sense we're familiar with. Minecraft isn't more complex than Starcraft from a human intelligence POV. Kids can play Minecraft. It's about the difficulty of fitting it into current methods. We can solve Go because we have a symbolic-neuro planning approach (monte carlo tree search over an evaluation net) that almost perfectly models the correct way to reason about the game at an expert level. This is an incredibly strong inductive bias that gives AlphaGo an unfair head start over AlphaStar. Starcraft is harder to solve because we don't have such a symbolic approach figured out, and we need the net to learn visual representations and connect those visual representations to actions, and we have a continuous action space. So good luck with that! Minecraft is even harder to model because the rewards are so sparse.
„it‘s not economical to build good software“
It's hard to tell what the "input frequency" even means in this case. For example for keyboard players tapping is a common technique, while controller/joystick players will rely more on fluid control. Does it mean AI can do a single frame tap/release? What about gradual increase in steering between steps? There's lots more edge cases than that too.
> Who the fuck are you, white man, to say what is and is not consistent with an "Indigenous way of building"?

Who the fuck are you, white man, to say "It's high time the indigenous people reclaimed their sovereignty"? You're foisting your notions of sovereignty and time unto them, which is racist.

P.S.: I'm indigenous ;)
Well the comment by pnin made it about GR, when the parent by boringuser2 was about the general contributions to relativity, both SR and GR. I believe "general theory of relativity" to be different than "general relativity" here, the former encompassing both SR and GR. Maybe that's where our misunderstanding comes from. Also, if you believe that GR has absolutely nothing to do with SR, then no Lorentz has no relevance to the genesis of General Relativity.

Anyway I don't believe we're having a discussion worth having here.
My impression as well. I could be totally wrong, but it feels like the work of someone who’s got the fediverse hammer and who’s also too immersed in the social media one-place-to-consume-them-all mindset to realize the absurdity.
@pushmatrix on Twitter/X has some really interesting integrations between the Vision Pro and Blender.

Look at the real time modeling and Chores 2.0 posts examples. I imagine this would also be a good candidate for integration like that.
You believe the interesting, valuable part is the three lines of CSS it will take to improve rendering on baby internet browsers? Not the part where they federated a Wiki-style system?
If HTTP[23] are more complex than HTTP1.1, it is a mistake.
Evaluating the conditions is very subjective
I believe the point in 'slowing'/'not-slowing', is that while we are still talking about 'games' and beating humans, the games that are being tackled are getting more complex in each iteration, solving new problems.

And DeepMind did go off and tackle increasingly complex areas in other fields.

Not sure how anyone can argue AI slowed down. Maybe advancements in one particular game slowed down, but was that because they hit a wall? or because they shifted company resources after a game demo.

I'm not sure how you are measuring time, do you think that because AlphaStar was a few years ago, that means AI advancement slowed down? Because there wasn't another breakthrough in AlphaStar? Because they didn't keep going and fully build out every race and unit?

Do you think DeepMind has been throwing resources at Star Craft and just hitting a brick wall?

It was a proof of concept, they beat some humans, and moved on to other things like Protein Folding. Was the Protein Folding not impressive enough to think AI was still advancing?

AI is continuing to advance, because for each iteration it is tackling bigger, more complex, problems.

----------

The time between each breakthrough does seem to be a down line, less time between each plateau.

Chess : Board with a lot of possible moves, but 'manageable', the AI could just calculate every move.

GO: More possible moves than atoms in the universe or something. So the AI had to use some form of 'intuition', it could no longer brute force calculate every move. (it was only few months after AlphaGO won that they turned the same engine on Chess and it 'learned' from scratch to be a Master in only a few hours.)

SC2: There are no 'moves' it is all real time movement, and most important, there as imperfect information. The AI had to scout and keep track of un-known positions, to remember and anticipate.

Dota: Honestly, I'm not sure what the big breakthrough is for Dota. But quibbling over how many 'hero's the AI had access to seems pedantic. Wasn't this years ago. This isn't a knock on AI, the Dota work was years ago. We're arguing about an AI that is 3+ years old now. I really don't think that you can say AI research slowed because a company stopped throwing money at a game demo.

Protein Folding: Hey, lets stop just focusing on games and do something to help the world.

Poker: Wasn't Poker also conquered in this time frame, in last 2 years? Showing ability to bluff?

3D Virtual Environment: Was in discussion in another thread where everyone's main argument was AI isn't 'embodied' in the 'world', doesn't 'live' in the 'world'. And boom, same day, another breakthrough covering that. Giving machine what we would call 'vision', to understand objects in the world.

------------

Now slap this into a robot, give it a gun, and tell it the world is a 3d game.

LOL.

"We haven't had a miracle in the last 6 months, oh no, AI advancement is slowing down."
They don't need the data brokers. You can just call up the tax office on the phone and ask for someones address or person number. You get it, no questions asked.

The article is very confused about this. There are two separate issues:

1. the principle of free information ("freedom of information" in the US is super weak compared do Swedens much older laws)

2. Doing stuff with this data on a large scale and in bulk. This is where data brokers come in. This is also not needed for the gangs.
My suspicion is that supplements and protein shakes are ultra processed food, full of the same preservatives and emulsifiers that are likely candidates for the increase in cancer.
You are all wrong.

This is a GFX toolkit!
The advantage of Mastodon is that you can actually run the whole thing on your own to not be forced under anyones moderation whereas with bluesky there are still central parts run by a US corporation that will censor you.

Not saying that the fediverse is a great design - tying identities to instances is inexcusable. But Bluesky's central corporate backing makes it a nonstarter.
Is that even legal to have it closed source in a democracy???
We are all breathing a bit of dust, and we all contributed to that mining a little bit by buying phones...
Ppl tend to care for things that enable bonuses
Yes how is the viewport size really relevant? A sensible site would have a max column width for any paragraph. So if I have a 4000px wide viewport and view a 500px wide column of text, it has to be the same size as the 500px column of text also if the browser window is just 1000px?
> This is called head-of-line blocking. In the diagram below, request 2 cannot be sent until response 1 arrives, considering that only one TCP connection is used.

Thats not really head of line blocking, because in HTTP1.1 you'd just open up another connection. The issue with HTTP1.1 is that opening up lots of connections can introduce lots of latency, especially if you are doing Encryption.

HTTP1.1 performs much much better over high latency or lossy links than http2

> With HTTP/2, this problem is solved with streams, each stream corresponds to a message. Many streams can be interleaved in a single TCP packet. If a stream can't emit its data for some reason, other streams can take its place in the TCP packet.

This is where HTTP2 failed. It shoved everything into one single TCP connection which works fine on LAN and LAN like networks, and sucks balls in the real world. This is Top of line blocking and was entirely predictable had the HTTP2 team bothered to talk to anyone who did networking.

Its part of the reason why I was greatly suspicious of QUIC, because it appeared like it was designed by the same people that thought http2 was a good idea.

However QUIC seems to be actually reasonable. I've yet to fully test it in real world scenarios, but it does offer promise for highspeed latency resistant data streaming. One day I'll re-write my TCP multiplexor to compare the performance.
I think it is worth trying to relate it to lived experience and ask "is this actually a problem or are we imagining problems that are unlikely to manifest?".

I used to develop in Java in large organizations for many years and be responsible for deciding how we use the language, what libraries we use etc. I used to be pretty hard on developers who would choose third party libraries for anything the standard library already delivered. Even in cases where third party libraries were perhaps a bit better than the standard library. They'd have to offer a clear and significant advantage over the standard library over time to warrant consideration. Especially if we're talking about core functionality or something that would be expensive to replace later.

Every third party dependency you introduce is a potential problem because you have to track them. You have to care about their development and release practices, you have to track their license (which may change), the health of the project, you have to know how they respond to defects being discovered etc. You have to do this for every single piece of third party code if the code you work on is critical to your business.

My real-world experience is that third party code carries a much higher risk than whatever you depend on from a standard library and you can make mistakes that end up being extremely costly.
this is pretty nice and can lead to modular unikernel. however, there is some application we need patch to remove OS specific code.
s/homeowners/\0, landlords/
If the island is privately owned then hard to see how "future generations" will be able to study and enjoy it. Maybe, but probably not, eh? That's the point of it being privately owned. Now if the State of Hawaii were to assert eminent domain, acquire it at fair market value, and then turn it into public park lands as designated wilderness, well that might work for your intent, I think.
I am not really actively teaching them, but I am providing some resources like books. My older son (8) enjoys playing around with Scratch. I think it's great and at this age it's just good to experiment.
Race: Famously irrelevant to the whole tribal lands/indigenous rights topic
Damn why didn’t I think of that! Well done. And I wonder if in memory spreadsheets are similar to (and as efficient as) Pytorch Tensors anyway!
Best productivity app this year! :D
Just the "Trending Now" section is enough to convince me that this is a "newspaper" of the lowest possible quality.
You could take the word fuck out of the original comment and it would still have the clear reasoning that Gordon Price as a white person should not be telling an indigenous group that what they want to do is not the "Indigenous way".

White person should not define "Indigenous way".

How else can we misinterpret this argument?
> Don’t the many zero setback cities invalidate your setback argument? They’re not drowning in stormwater - clearly it can be managed in a number of ways.

This means nothing without knowing the specifics of the local geography and ecosystem.

> Why not admit to yourself that you just like exclusionary land use regulations, and are comfortable with the impacts on the cost of living, increased commutes, etc.?

I’m not denying that our current zoning is exclusionary. It absolutely is. It’s excluding developers who want to sweep through and enshittify the place for a quick profit without regard to long-term viability.

> It’s not your neighborhood under threat, it’s your status quo.

In our case, the status quo many of our rules are meant to protect is, “the peninsula still exists and remains accessible by land,” so it’s both.
My personal experience is that the default is usually wrong, especially when I move between different displays. I end manually zooming in/zooming out a lot.

Meanwhile using the default size + CSS keyword size modifiers (large/x-large etc.) ended up on breaking on the project I mentioned, especially after for all practical purposes we had to deal with the fact that claims of single display size & resolution to target weren't actually delivered, and when client also asked about possibly opening the interface from portable devices.
Well luckily we live in 2024 where finding any amount of information is literally a few clicks away and there’s more than enough media coverage to stay informed. Someone that might be interested in finding more can… look it up.

The first results for “sxsw Palestine”:

https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2024/3/13/artists-and-spe...

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/13/us/sxsw-army-sponsorship-...

https://www.vulture.com/article/sxsw-palestine-defense-indus...

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/texas/news/dozens-of-artists-boy...

https://pitchfork.com/news/sxsw-addresses-us-army-sponsorshi...

https://tribune.com.pk/story/2459328/more-than-80-participan...

https://amp.theguardian.com/music/2024/mar/06/sxsw-musicians...

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/03/13/us/sxsw-military-sponsors...

I don’t think it’s reasonable that every single post needs to reference what’s going on with sources to make their point. We’re all adults, we all have access to the internet and news outlets.
Am I wrong in thinking that falling off is not punished enough in this approach? Looking at the numbers provided, falling off seems to still add some distance and not get any punishment, just an end of episode. I'd be tempted to subtract 1 for each step after the car falls off, otherwise the RL will accept the distance gain as progress.

Can anyone spot better opportunities for improvement?
It is simply not your business to tell disadvantaged people how they should exercise their rights. They have agency and can decide for themselves. If this means, some of the nature has to be sacrificed, that’s their business, not yours to decide.

If you care so much, undevelop your own land and restore the nature and the balance. Plant forests over your parking lots and golf courses, erase suburbia and embrace minimalist living. That is so simple.
What stood out to me most is the existence of a "media license".

Wouldn't letting the government decide who qualifies as media go against the idea of free press?

Just get rid of that nonsense. No more problems.
is there anything like this for Puppeteer? Selenium is just ab it heavy.
The real wikipedia renders (perfectly!) without javascript.

This does not render at all without javascript.

Not an alternative.
You'd think that, but...
I agree tribal echo chambers is more of a problem than moderating to keep conversation on topic, but I wouldn’t go so far as to say it was censorship because the people in these echo chambers still have access to opposing viewpoints if they choose to go looking for them. This contrasts with journalists in Russia “just going to another country”, their views still won’t be available to their intended audience.
The article is quite confused about how Swedish law has worked for hundreds of years. Address, person numbers (which encode birthday), income, these are all public records. Have been for over a hundred years. It's not a big deal or scandal. In combination with our freedom of information laws (which actually are that, unlike the ones in the US that are super weak), these make it quite easy for journalists to find and expose corruption. For en example read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Guillou#The_IB_affair
I have personally observed this kind of reasoning that (out of ignorance) equates arguments with very different importance. Being able to say that "scientists lie to the children" could easily become a serious argument for them.