skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It seems to me that your Y is actually the X. An actual Y would be to suggest they use Perl instead.
"lack of intellectual rigour in contemporary post-modern cultural studies"

Is putting it rather kindly.
It’s not… SUVs are hostile to everyone else on the road… they consume more space, generate more pollutants
What do you mean practically by: "the cost of insurance approaches infinity due to infinite uncertainty"?
You don't even need water, you can just transfer the heat to the soil under your house
Sapere aude, motherfuckers!
Hi there, I help design the OpenAI APIs. Would you be able to share more?

You can reply here or email me at atty@openai.com.

(Please don't hold back; we would love to hear the pain points so we can fix them.)
This is reasonable and correct. I would also have found places in that map for: dcache, block devices, character devices, scheduler, page cache and console/tty/pty. The first two replace "filesystem hierarchy". The second and third are ancient and fundamental classes of UNIX devices.
Well, it was also the name of a bird long before that
For a long time I've seen Kant as someone who deeply misunderstood the Enlightenment. It was specifically meant to free people of this endless bickering over some scripture or other abstract issue, and told them see for themselves. But science has long descended back into "rationalism" (what an unfortunate term), and is no better than what the enlightenment fought against.
However, we are talking through a social media website.
Which is the source for General Relativity, which suffered too from an attribution dispute with Hilbert's works.

My point being: science doesn't happen in a vacuum, and is not totally ordered
There are already alternatives to Fandom. I volunteer with Miraheze.org, which hosts wikis without all of the ads, has been up since 2015, and has recently become a US nonprofit. We're currently geared towards more technical users, but we're trying to make more tooling to simplify wiki administration as we've taken on more users.

I also hear wiki.gg is pretty good, but they're focused on gaming wikis. A lot of Fandom wikis jumped ship to them (of course Fandom is like Hotel California, you can check out any time you like but your wiki content will never come down).
Why do we never mention all that traffic running outside everyones doors all the time?
I think this is terrific. It's high time the indigenous people reclaimed their sovereignty. The idea that "When you’re building 30, 40-storey high rises out of concrete, there’s a big gap between that and an Indigenous way of building" is just ridiculous. Who the fuck are you, white man, to say what is and is not consistent with an "Indigenous way of building"? You aren't living the same lifestyle and building the same buildings that your ancestors were hundreds of years ago, why should they? I say: more power to the (Indigenous) people!

(P.S.: I'm a white guy.)
In software world it is killing it so they can sell a new one in general.
Let me try to explain it in a way that the acronym does make sense. For ages people have exchanged information about buildings in 2d and non-semantic line drawings with only an implicit symbolic meaning.

In BIM, a building (or any construction work really, bridges/tunnels/...) is described as a set of components with explicit information (the I), for example: this is a wall with fire rating XYZ. The geometry/representation is only one aspect of that wall. This information is exchanged using actual data models (the M) - hopefully using IFC (another acronym, less meaningful this time), which is the open and vendor neutral standard to encode such building models.

There's a lot of disciplines (architects, structural engineers, heating and ventilation, city planners and municipalities, planners, builders, owners, tenants). Also, building have a long lifetime, that extends way beyond the typical maintenance period of proprietary software. And the sector has a massive impact on our well being as well as environmental goals.

Encoding this information in a semantic and computer-interpretable has enabled better ways of working together, but there's still much potential and many interesting challenges (come join us!) ahead of us to make a better built environment a reality!
this is analagous to the fs hierarchy: root protects from the user
They prefer the latter because the mere existence of the knowledgable, informed, involved engineer questions the need for the manager at all.
That would depend much more on cattle and lawnmowers than on fires. But it does not matter, because we don't need to wait for the natural spreading of the seeds.

We can plant any tree that we need, were we need it. And we, for sure, will need a lot in the near future.

After all, we put any road that we need where we need it. It was not an obstacle for the last 200 years, so all is needed is the political will to do the same with forests.
Ask HN: Are you teaching your kids to code? (and how)
Parents of Hacker News, I'm curious to know if parents in the tech community here are teaching their kids to code - and if so, what apps, online classes, or other resources you're using? What do you like? Thanks!
Maybe make it tender properly on iOS safari first?
he wasnt allowed to magnet fish at this spot, so he was basically unlawfully looting
Plus how long does each turbine need to operate for before it mitigates the CO2 and other pollutants produced by building and operating the plane?
it's also worth bringing up some arguments made by Theodore Tso over this very issue in 1998[1]:

> Consider the following --- what defines "link"? Does an RPC call mean linking? What about shared libraries? What about making calls via the system call interface? What about running GPL'ed programs via the system() command from a commercial program? If you take things to extremes, a commercial program which uses the system() program will be interfacing with the GPL'ed /bin/bash on most systems --- is that considered "linking"?

> And if not, what is the legal distinction between what /etc/ld.so does when it maps a GPL'ed library into memory and the thread of control is temporarily tranfered from propietary code to GPL'ed library code when a library function is called, and what happens when a propietary program calls system() and the kernel maps /bin/bash into system memory, and the thread of control transfers temporarily from the propietary program to /bin/bash? You can see how things can get quite ridiculous quite quickly.

> [...]

> The FSF assertion also a very dangerous legal argument to make. If this is true, does this mean that if you write code which happens to make use of interfaces developed by Microsoft and implemented by Microsoft DLL's, that Microsoft somehow has a claim over your code which it could enforce via copyright law? What about any i386 assembly code which makes use of the Intel machine language? Does Intel now have a copyright claim on all i386 object code, and can try to prevent people from executing i386 object code on non-Intel processors? (After all, when a Pentium interprets your object code, one could argue that it is "linking" your object code with the Pentium microcode, which is copyrighted by Intel....)

> What the FSF is trying to advocate is one step down the slippery slope of interface copyrights, and we really, really don't want to go there.

i've seen arguments especially after the Google v. Oracle[2] decision and I think one in particular mentioned the sort of "reality distortion field"[3], which I found to be interesting, especially because a lot of open source projects that are GPL tend to rely on the good-naturedness of other users using their code in a way that's positively in spirit with the GPL. (which, to be fair, has probably helped open source immensely.)

but as Tso points out, therein lies a contradiction with GPL that at if its maximal interpretation to be correct, it's much much more dangerous, than if the GPL effectively is equivalent to the LGPL. but I don't think that (barring a world pre-this-case) this world is the one that is so. (no idea how the AGPL fits into this though, that sounds like a PITA.)

if I were ruler of the world, I'd say that symbol names are a matter of fact and thus should probably not be copyrightable by themselves. but then again I don't rule the world, and I'd probably have other things to change as well, even about copyright.

[1]: https://yarchive.net/comp/gpl_linking.html

[2]: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/18-956_d18f.pdf

[3]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30404270
"Criticism is no longer going to be practiced in the search for formal structures with universal value, but rather as a historical investigation into the events that have led us to constitute ourselves and to recognize ourselves as subjects of what we are doing, thinking, saying. In that sense, this criticism is not transcendental, and its goal is not that of making a metaphysics possible: it is genealogical in its design and archaeological in its method. Archaeological -- and not transcendental -- in the sense that it will not seek to identify the universal structures of all knowledge or of all possible moral action, but will seek to treat the instances of discourse that articulate what we think, say, and do as so many historical events. And this critique will be genealogical in the sense that it will not deduce from the form of what we are what it is impossible for us to do and to know; but it will separate out, from the contingency that has made us what we are, the possibility of no longer being, doing, or thinking what we are, do, or think. It is not seeking to make possible a metaphysics that has finally become a science; it is seeking to give new impetus, as far and wide as possible, to the undefined work of freedom."

It's worth reading Foucault's entire discussion of Kant's essay, published on the second centenary of the original:

http://individual.utoronto.ca/bmclean/hermeneutics/foucault_...
Doesn't this suffer the problem that you're then putting heat into the device, which is in your house, during the warm season when you want your house to stay cool?
Is it Apple and Google?
Stick to My Weight Loss Goals
I have issues motivating myself when it comes to losing weight. Thats why I created a page where you can set a goal and if you don't reach it, you will donate to a charity.
Ok, we've put that up there now. Thanks!
Except with a different set of languages that people actually want to use, as well as runtimes preinstalled on every user-facing computer on earth.

Have you never had to deal with java and .net installs across various platforms? It's a mess.
Except with a different set of languages that people actually want to use, as well as runtimes preinstalles on every user-facing computer on earth.

Have you never had to deal with java and .net installs across various platforms? It's a mess.
How do they use it then?
LOL that’s totally me. Thanks for posting.
I can recommend taking a look at /proc and /sys, because that will clear up a lot of how things are intertwined and connected.

procfs is what's used by pretty much all tools that do something with processes, like ps, top etc.

The everything is a file philosophy becomes much more clear then. Even low level syscalls and their structs are offered by the kernel as file paths so you can interact with them by parsing those files as a struct, without actually needing to use kernel headers for compilation.

eBPF and its bytecode VM are a little over the top, but are essential to known about in the upcoming years cause a lot of tools is moving towards using their own bpf modules.
To be honest, that likely had little to do with Selenium (although there were fewer options around back then) but more with the expectations around the tests.

UI front-end tests are often brittle because people try to test things through them that should have been tested in earlier stages. Either on API level or unit level.

Just to give a simple example. Say you have a login screen. It has a username input, password input, login button and finally a div to show any messages.

The only things you actually want to test here are:

1. A succes login action
2. A action that leads to a message being shown in the message div.
3. *If* there are multiple categories of messages (error, warning, etc) possibly one of each message.

What you don't want to test here are all sorts of login variations that ultimately test input validation (API level) or some other mechanism surrounding password (possibly unit testing).

The problem is that often, and certainly the decade earlier you are talking about, is that companies often take their manual regression tests and just throw them into automation. Forgetting that those manual regressions tests are equally brittle but that this is often overlooked due to the way manual tests are done and reported on.

Having said all that. Selenium is still a solid option in a java environment. But as others have pointed out, there are other very solid options out there like Playwright.
But these also can be equally as brittle if the tests are not setup properly.
The cause of identity fraud is lack of authentication, not existence of SSN. It's equivalent to going to a bank and telling "I'm Elon Musk, give me my money" and then complain that we must eliminate names to prevent this kind of fraud.
The difference is that you can live a normal life in the western part of the world where as in palestine you would be dead. In the west, if you get harassed because of your sexuality you can take legal action against them. That is not possible in most middle eastern countries because your sexuality is the thing that is illegal and even if you were harassed in reality you would be the one being persecuted.

Of course you would experience more issues at home, because that is where you live. But I dare you to go to a middle eastern country if it's so safe. Stay there for a couple of months and tell me how much of an islamophobe I am. It's not islamophobia if it is the reality.

Your kind of type of argument reminds me of my chickens, they have no survival instinct and barely run away from my dog that tries to eat them. This is what the safety of the west have turn people into in my opinion.
I've got no first hand experience of those cities, so no I won't.

The point I'm trying to make with Amsterdam is that it's really nothing special when compared to a bunch of other nearby cities. Sure if you want to visit the Anne Frank house you need to go to Amsterdam and stand in a long line. If, however, you are more interested in the culture of the country you can find that nearly anywhere. Pretty much any city of reasonable size will have a FEBO and a pancake restaurant and a couple of neat museums. No need to queue for those, and yet people DO queue for those in Amsterdam for some reason.
s/homeowners/landlords/
I've used both MSW and Storybook, and they're both fine. They both have some advantages and disadvantages. One advantage of Storybook is that getting to a particular state on a particular page is a matter of selecting the right story, whereas with our MSW setup, I have to simulate a login with a user with the right characteristics, and then navigate through our UI to get to the step in the flow I'm looking for.

In another project we've adopted React Server Components, and no longer have an API - so MSW is not even an option there. Storybook does work, although it's still a bit of a hassle to have to split our Server Components into two components, only one of which actually makes use of server-side APIs.
Cannot take a project like this seriously in 2024 while looking like total garbage [1] on mobile.

[1] https://i.ibb.co/3RWgMGy/IMG-4197.jpg
> And it would! If you would just let the browser do what it wants to do!

Ok, so it's an incentives/management problem. The people doing the work have no reason to care.

Also, I suspect some of it might be caused by misuse of frameworks.
> The OP read like a moaning Amsterdammer.

I'm very glad I don't live in Amsterdam, commuting there is bad enough. I'm actually trying to convince people to visit, among other places, the city I live in. Spreading the tourists around more will make everyone happier. Including the tourists.
Joggling Etiquette
As a meager pedestrian, I consume Wikipedia instead of Encyclopedias - that I sometimes did when I was a kid
How does this compare to krustlet.dev?
I immediately implemented streaming into my rocketchat gpt bot, was definitely a distraction but my colleagues liked it. No more waiting until the complete response is sent.
> Is the calculator overestimating?

Maybe. My own calculus gives a first approximate value of 50Kg of Carbon for the same trip NY-London (approx 5570Km) in optimum conditions. The calculators forget also that sometimes tail winds can help, so is just an unsophisticated raw average.

In any case nothing prevent us to design hybrid planes to reduce the fuel consume. A turbine is just a motor so can be built in several different ways. And we could try also both things, hybrid planes and helping forests at the same time.
Why not? Do you care to expand on your comment?
"Tech journalists writing about technology is interesting, reports tech journalist."
Given that you're talking about your "study of maths", I presume that you're a student. Well, Bourbaki books aren't textbooks. They're reference books. They're great when you need a theorem and you know you can just pickup your copy of "Lie algebras" and find it exactly where you expect it to be. And you know the proof will be there, and you know the proof of every single lemma used will be there. But it's not a learning tool. Think more about a dictionary/encyclopedia than a school book. You wouldn't learn to speak English by reading an English dictionary.
Apparently F5 shipped it in production in their proprietary version, while it was not compiled into the free version.

So technically the CVE should be filed against NGINX Plus, not nginx ;)
It seems that the YX problem is a derivative of the XY problem. In both cases we solve for X.
And how do I enable Perl regex for e.g., the Snowflake SQL regex functions? ;)

I’m laughing because I had this exact XY problem. Searched StackExchange for a potential workaround for a certain regex I wanted to match, and the answer said to use Perl regexes instead. Cool... except as far as I can’t tell the database we use doesn’t support that. I rolled my eyes and went to look at other search results.
Might as well not be for many companies; I know many who are not allowed to even glance at AGPL code for fear of getting infected (and sued).
Try to do something slightly complicated and have GPT4 explain how to do it efficiently in Excel!

That's how I do it and it works great. I've gained a new appreciation for Excel.
Given the historical parallels between the troubles and the current gaza conflict, It's not exactly surprising specifically Irish musicians decided to boycott.
In the same way the risk premium of a financial security is proportional to its riskiness.
What did we expect? We have here a tool specifically good for writing the things we cant be asked to. This is the one of the primary use cases for LLMs. We all want to use AI to write our emails and resumes, but no one else is allowed to.

I think this is the exact problem with genAI: we all know it's fake and shit and don't want it if someone else is using it. It's like the cheap insta-mash of creativity. A lazy, un-gratifying knock-off.
Why are WebAssembly binaries smaller than native?
Think of the water tank as being in but insulated from the house.

In the hot summer the hot air within the house is cooled by heat pumping the heat into the water tank which is slowly over weeks bought up from cold to mean summer tempreture.

In the winter the heat is extracted from the water and transfered to the house.

The house and the water mass are out of phase by six months.
Problem is the introduction was generated with chatgpt and they forgot to remove the 'Sure, here is a...' :)
Ovid's myths of macOS: password entry dialogs and the death of Semele
* researchers and clinicians
> instead of asking here for the source I pinged the esteemed GPT

Which gave you a wrong answer, as it is found in Volume 6, Psychological Types (pp. 268-267) published in 1971 (not sure about that date, maybe it's just the edition I found - looks like it might be 1921 which adds another layer of wrong to ChatGPT's answer).

I really don't understand why people would ask ChatGPT for this kind of thing.
But there's also the not-so-common (yet still somewhat frequent) case where the inputs are highly different. Myers diff alone would take quadratic time, which in practice is often unacceptable.

Real-world implementations often have a limit on the amount of difference (e.g. max(256, sqrt(input size))), and if that's exceeded, they switch to heuristics (so the resulting diff is no longer guaranteed to be minimal). This reduces the worst-case runtime from O(N*2) to O(N*1.5).
They probably mean smaller than containers which package a slimmed down OS plus the executable binary.
Good thing I never claimed plans don't fly

I think you'll find that definition "intelligence" is a bit harder than defining "flight", and convincing people that "a machine programmed to mechanically follow the steps in the minimax algorithm as applied to chess, and do nothing else" doesn't fit most people's definition of "intelligence" in the context of the philosophical question of what constitutes intelligence.
The X asked for a regex, not a command-line parameter. It's possible that the user was actually using POSIX grep, in which case Y ("don't invert the regex, use this command-line parameter to invert what's done with the result of the regex") is the answer they actually need. It's also possible that they're using some other tool, which they know implements POSIX-compatible regexes, but doesn't have an easy way to invert the usage; in which case the user really does need an answer to X (i.e., a way to invert the regex).
Maybe because I use ChatGPT-4 a lot I find ChatGPT-4 responses more credible than Gemini/Bard. I personally feel Gemini that is trying hard to not offend me and is also trying to sugarcoat the truth. It also feels kind of half baked.
Don't Make These 9 Mistakes When Building Your Startup
Interesting. How does performance compare to other wikis? I'm thinking that something like this may be attractive for a browsable self-hosted private knowledge base with a "sync" server hosted on a VPS and local instances running on different machines which may or may not have persistent connections.
> The everything is a file philosophy becomes much more clear then.

To be honest, everything is a file is kind of a lie in unix. /proc and /sys are pretty much plan9 inspiration.