skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't think so, for the future it would be easy to recreate what the situation was, I could determine that they are tools recreated by scientists from the past.
You can definitionally be fired for giving excessive details about your strait lifestyle. Also, anyone can have kids via marriage, adoption, etc.
That was my first “work” computer. Came with MS-DOS 2.11 IIRC.

Spent many an happy hour with it putting together various DB applications using Delta IV - a hierarchical database system.
A few thoughts after having read only the abstract:

1. The decline (which is reported to be less frequent in cannabis users) is self-reported subjective cognitive decline based on users’ experience.

2. I think that one of the hallmarks of cannabis use is an immediate decline in short-term memory. I believe this usually reverses itself after some time (hours or days).

3. I have used a lot of cannabis in the past. I stopped entirely - for now - for quite some time and I think my mental acuity is currently at its peak over my lifetime and may be growing.

4. Not only is cannabis a very highly cultivated plant whose potency has been increasing a lot for decades (citation needed), there are a ton of cannabis-derived products out there today that have just a ton of THC, way more than one could get by smoking even the highest potency bud. I think this has prohably changed the game entirely. I used a few of them and I would absolutely recommend caution, far beyond the legitimate caution I would recommend for even smoking cannabis bud.
The issue with this is if you have memory loss, you may also have memory loss about the memory loss, so lower numbers here may actually not reflect a real increase in memory retention.
If the community is able to implement new features better, faster, and more open than the company, then the company probably should be pushed out of the project.

If that has to happen via forking and directly competing with them, so be it.
Its the combination of disappointment that it wasn't merged and that it took several months to get back on a significant contribution (whilst adding their own version into their enterprise offering in the meantime). Of course there's going to be some emotions, and rightfully so.
They just let the guy create the feature and it will be integrated to the EE.
Those are not the kind of skills Yuval is talking about—he's talking about job skills, not "be nice to people".
I think that depends on the usage and what they're smoking tbf. Weed can play havok with sleep or be an aid.
Thanks. I was having such a hard time parsing this that I was beginning to have my own experience of subjective cognitive decline. Glad to know I'm not alone.

So those that get stoned are more confident in their mind's ability than those that don't?
Most people make up another account for self praise. Well done for being honest.
I’ve personally run into both Richard Branson flying Virgin Atlantic and Oscar Munoz flying United. The C Suite of an airline is likely using it plenty.
If someone builds a feature faster, better, and more open than the paid alternative and gives it away long before the enterprise version even announces the feature, where is the entitlement?
>show a fundamental issue with the open core model

The alternative is the code doesnt exist.

>Usually, you expect that developers

When developers give away software for free I have no expections of them. If they fix a bug I consider that a favor not an obligation on their part.

There is a culture of entitlement surrounding open source which drives "expectations" from people who give stuff away for free and it's maddening.
I never had too much trouble, I could reach the ground fine when I was stopped. The front wheel was smaller than the rear - https://files.bikeindex.org/uploads/Pu/56152/large_Giro-A20-...

I honestly am surprised I survived. The commute was 90% bliss (down the beach path from Santa Monica to El Segundo) and 10% terror (getting around Marina Del Rey and when I had to go inland). One time I rode down Lincoln blvd (a terrible idea) and nearly got pancaked. I heard brakes squealing behind me for _several_ seconds and a pickup truck came to a stop 6 inches behind my rear wheel. I think they'd been looking at their phone and not the red light with traffic waiting for it. Absolutely joyous ride though - I wish I had a gopro back then, one time dolphins were jumping out of the water alongside me as I went down the Ballona creek Jetty https://maps.app.goo.gl/cSHddj3sRF7YUsFt5
Do you have any formal knowledge of what traditional forms of Buddhism teach? Because this assertion is divorced from what is actually contained in Buddhism. There is a duality, there is an evil one, and contrary to popular American conception, contains a panoply of divine beings and assertions concerning the moral nature of the universe. The following are not isolated instances, but are spread all over the Pali Canon.

The Pali Canon, SN 35:189 (tr. Thanissaro Bhikkhu)^2:

>There are forms, monks, cognizable via the eye—agreeable, pleasing, charming, endearing, enticing, linked to sensual desire. If a monk relishes them, welcomes them, & remains fastened to them, he is said to be a monk who has swallowed Māra’s hook, who has fallen into misfortune & disaster. The Evil One can do with him as he will.

>“There are sounds cognizable via the ear…

>“There are aromas cognizable via the nose…

>“There are flavors cognizable via the tongue…

>“There are tactile sensations cognizable via the body…

>“There are ideas cognizable via the intellect—agreeable, pleasing, charming, endearing, enticing, linked to sensual desire. If a monk relishes them, welcomes them, & remains fastened to them, he is said to be a monk who has swallowed Māra’s hook, who has fallen into misfortune & disaster. The Evil One can do with him as he will.

Similarly with gentle persuasion.

Pali Canon, MN 20 (tr. Thanissaro Bhikkhu)^2:

>If evil, unskillful thoughts—connected with desire, aversion or delusion—still arise in the monk while he is attending to the relaxing of thought-fabrication with regard to those thoughts, then—with his teeth clenched and his tongue pressed against the roof of his mouth—he should beat down, constrain, and crush his mind with his awareness. As—with his teeth clenched and his tongue pressed against the roof of his mouth—he is beating down, constraining, and crushing his mind with his awareness, those evil, unskillful thoughts are abandoned and subside. With their abandoning, he steadies his mind right within, settles it, unifies it, and concentrates it. Just as a strong man, seizing a weaker man by the head or the throat or the shoulders, would beat him down, constrain, and crush him; in the same way, if evil, unskillful thoughts—connected with desire, aversion or delusion—still arise in the monk while he is attending to the relaxing of thought-fabrication with regard to those thoughts, then—with his teeth clenched and his tongue pressed against the roof of his mouth—he should beat down, constrain, and crush his mind with his awareness. As—with his teeth clenched and his tongue pressed against the roof of his mouth—he is beating down, constraining, and crushing his mind with his awareness, those evil, unskillful thoughts are abandoned and subside. With their abandoning, he steadies his mind right within, settles it, unifies it, and concentrates it.

---

1 - https://www.dhammatalks.org/suttas/SN/SN35_189.html

2 - https://www.dhammatalks.org/suttas/MN/MN20.html
"get" "for free"? Where do users expect to "get" something for free? In fact, users are offering something "for free".
> But it is unreasonable to talk about "... deliberately makes choices that prioritise revenue and stock prices over safety ..."

I can't see how that is unreasonable. Nobody here is arguing that Boeing officials should be held criminally liable because they didn't invest enough money into safety. The liability is because they are blatantly disregarding safety. They invented MCAS and didn't let pilots know about it. One plane crashes and they don't care. Second plane crashes and they don't care. For years, stupid things keep happening and they still don't care.

By your logic, a psychopath CEO may deliberately undermine safety culture to earn more profits and still won't be held responsible, because it's “limited liability”. Limited liability means that financial liability is limited, not criminal one.
Wikipedia calls it the "No Symbol" [0]. ISO 7010 calls it the "prohibition sign" [1]. In Unicode, it's available as a combining character with the practical name "COMBINING ENCLOSING CIRCLE BACKSLASH" (U+20E0) [2] and in emoji form it's the "NO ENTRY SIGN" (U+1F6AB) [3].

0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_symbol

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_7010

2: https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+20E0

3: https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+1F6AB
I have personally never seen the 0-byte files people keep talking about here. In every S3 bucket I’ve ever looked at, the “directories” don’t exist at all. If you have a dir/file1.txt and dir/file2.txt, there is NO such object as dir. Not even a placeholder.
A person writes code for a feature that is not merged into the project and you call them entitled?
Cognitive decline is scary, because if it happens gradually enough, you wouldn’t even realize it’s happening.

Was I sharper a few years ago? Maybe, I really couldn’t tell you, and it’s not like I’ve been taking cognitive evaluations to check.

Scary thoughts.
The mysterious rise of PDD, the Chinese e-commerce giant behind Temu
> we study less advanced animals and plants from this planet extensively

Yes, but we generally don't have to go to a lot of trouble to find specimens.
Certainly not. UBI is basic. It’s subsistence living. Anyone with a job would enjoy the benefits of their labor.
I'm off topic, but can you imagine that in the future there could be an electronic device and through advanced studies on material, atoms and quantum, they could recreate all the information that said device once had? I imagine they could study the Internet of the past even if the backups were lost.
I've seen this kind of thing pop up in forums over the years. Depending on the audience involved, either you start with strong moderation from the start and make no apologies, or you kinda let "the board decide." Invariably in the latter case, users eventually decide they want moderator elections, etc. because they can't trust the system and the moderators allowed dissent.

HN takes the former model and it seems to have worked out pretty well.
12 gauge wire can easily handle the current needs of household LED lighting. Most modern houses in the US have 14 gauge. That can still be made to work.

The real reason -- as another commenter here said -- is that the lights would have to be in series and all must require the same current.
Basically pot makes you less self-aware.

Which is exactly the effect some people are seeking with it.
I haven't seen marketing related to audio fingerprinting protection. Maybe Hanlon's applies here.

As for your point about the pattern of vulnerabilities: I'd attribute this to being closed source. They keep shipping security features with limited auditing, and only discover flaws in production.
you might want to google gp2 and github
You assume only "straight" people can have kids? Sexuality != having kids.
> Basically pot makes you less self-aware.

That is one interpretation, yes. But not the only possible one.

Is it good? Maybe. Maybe not good but neutral. Maybe actually bad. More research is needed.
100 (more) things you can do with your personal website
Ask HN: When will LLMs be able to interrupt or interject?
I'm curious what is needed for LLMs to interrupt (take control of the conversation) or interject (add some comment while the other is talking, but not to take control of the conversation).
He wasn’t fired for his beliefs. He was fired for screaming and interrupting a coworker’s presentation in a public setting.
What makes you assume people are more likely to email general practitioners?

I’d venture to say that people with chronic illnesses that require ongoing intervention to sustain daily life are more likely.

If you just have a migraine out of the blue you’re gonna need a full appointment to provide context.
This employee is an idiot and they deserved to be fired.

Shouting down others is not speech - it’s censorship, even a company with broad internal speech protections/policy is likely to enforce discourse standards.

Google would be better off taking a hard stance here - their culture from the outside seems pretty messed up, they’re going to need to fire a lot more to fix it (starting with their CEO imo).

This is independent of the specific views the employee held, though I think those views in this case are also wrong and the company can (and arguably should) fire people who hold views in conflict with the mission, especially when they act to cause problems internally.
The only one giving stuff away for free is the author of the PR. And yet, you're calling that person entitled.
Kids are everything, and the discussion of children is healthy and normal.
Yes, the tendency is not great. Besides the Boeing issues, there is a tendency in pilot training and flight operations I don't like, e.g. more flight hours, tough shift planning, training to be paid for the junior pilots. That being said, I'm on the production / design / maintenance side of things, and not operations, so my opinion on that is just that, an opinion.
IMHO, with kettles as you described variability of temperatures with rotating blowtorch will be lower. I don't think convection will be much different between two cases.
Not sure medicine is the best example given the same profit seeking culture is driving decisions where care takes a back seat
They were discontinued by Intel but the brand was picked up by Asus [0], so not discontinued [1].

[0] https://www.asus.com/us/content/nuc-overview/
[1] https://www.howtogeek.com/say-goodbye-to-intel-nuc-as-asus-t...
That is not what is being said.
Seems like an incorrect url for the submission.
That's cool information. I wonder what makes these systems ineffective for capturing UFOs? Is their output completely open access and uncensored? Do they have sensitivity in IR? Do they have an ability to capture / disambiguate extremely fast moving objects close to Earth?

There are other classified space systems that operate further out. But the public data on UAP says they are detected coming in "above 80,000 feet", which would be too low for these satellites to detect, I guess?

I suppose if it was like star trek and there were space ships just floating around the solar system, and hanging out at Jupiter Station or whatever, these systems would get it. Do these systems have any blind spots or blind areas of the sky that they don't cover?

Are they radars or visual systems?
It’s crazy to me that we have so many people that think they have a god given right to a paycheck. You get paid money to do what the person paying you wants you to do. Not because you are a good person who worked hard in high school and college and now deserve money from the sky for the rest of your life.
When the judge or jury look over to the defendants' table, they need to find someone they can trust and believe. Sometimes, yes, from the outside the result seems binary, but it's a process that everyone ideally navigates with dignity that might involve multiple levels of culpability and end with a sentence that is highly discretionary. The attorney could give weak factual defense on one or more levels of culpability to preserve credibility and generate more positive outcomes in terms of the process, dignity, and sentence. Also, the attorney is going to see that judge and prosecutor again ....
If speaking up against supplying surveillance and AI systems (to a state under investigation for genocide) is political, then so is supplying the systems in the first place.

If you have an issue with being protested, maybe don't directly assist the world's most live-streamed set of daily atrocities.
> You can be jailed for your political beliefs throughout most of Europe.

Uh ... since when?
Looking for that, I found wrongful death lawsuits that were settled under nondisclosure agreements, so they probably weren't LWT's source.

I also found that Genwal Resources, a subsidiary of a subsidiary of Murray Energy, agreed they had violated two safety regulations.

They were fined $500,000, but the government said "We were unable to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the company's actions caused the mine collapse"[1].

LWT didn't include that. Instead they simply said "the government's investigation...found it was caused by unauthorized mining practices." Don't you think "we were unable to prove [that]" should have been included by LWT?

1: https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2012/03/09/148319836...
Wow, so you think everyone must have the right to disrupt other people's lives with force? To block roads, to heckle meetings, is a god given right?

If someone wants to be heard, they have like 5 hours after work, an infinite amount of internet forums to spend political battles on, and they can't put their head down at work to just... work?
In my experience, this is yet more evidence of the quite unethical culture that has come to dominate executives in the last 4-5 decades across many industries. So many of them fail upwards by mindlessly focusing on shareholder value and cost-cutting for short term gains and the long term detriment of products and consumers under their watch. The way that safety and the health of customers and the general public is consistently ignored or thrown under the bus by executives in the name of cost-cutting and shareholder value, often against the explicit recommendations of employees, has become so common that I can't help but think there is something seriously wrong in the "education" (MBAs are more like finishing schools for corporate climbers) and hiring of these executives. We've incentivized ghouls to take over the reins who spend their days a bubbled class that have no need to, and can afford through absurd wealth to not, interact with or see the consequences of their asinine and dangerous decisions.
> unless you stand with some ridiculous little signs and everyone ignores you

What is "effective protest" in your view? Purposefully being a nuisance so you can't be ignored?
Reference to what? It's a word.
It would be incredibly sad if that turned out to be true, considering how much effort we're expending as a species to extinguish the life-bearing capabilities of the planet. Alone in the Universe, and not terribly far from wiping at least ourselves out (just one or two really bad decisions away from it, really)?
From my personal experience, having several friends that have been smoking since high school up to now (mid 30s), it's definitely 2).
That's odd considering cannabis use was shown to decrease REM sleep and thus memory processing and consolidation.
There would still be all kinds of attempts and stories with shitty camera evidence not from the air force right?
Weed just makes you care less about completing the cognitive exercises of the exam.
Does anyone have an actual link to a CISA declaration stating they were breached?
I am I very much in the ‘it’s their project and they can do what they want with it’ camp, BUT the way they handled it was absolutely awful. Total radio silence until a comment:

> At this point, I see them as doing us a favor by keeping the PR open because that enables us to easily find this code which we can then use to bake our own Docker images.

Then swoop in to close and lock the PR. Again, it’s their project- but surely there was a better course of action…. it probably starts with not ignoring the PR for months. What were they doing? Clearly they had eyes on it… just wishing it would disappear of its own accord?
It depends on a few factors. The list objects call hides deleted and noncurrent versions, but it has to skip over them. Grouping prefixes also takes time, if they contain a lot of noncurrent or deleted keys.

A pathological case would be a prefix with 100 million deleted keys, and 1 actual key at the end. Listing the parent prefix takes a long time in this case - I’ve seen it take several minutes.

If your bucket is pretty “normal” and doesn’t have this, or isn’t versioned, then you can do 4-5 thousand list requests a second, at any given key/prefix, in constant time. Or or you can explicitly list object versions (and not skip deleted keys) also in constant time.

It all depends on your data: if you need to list all objects then yeah it’s gonna be slow because you need to paginate through all the objects. But the point is that you don’t have to do that if you don’t want to, unlike a traditional filesystem with a directory hierarchy.

And this enables parallelisation: why list everything sequentially, when you can group the prefixes by some character (i.e “-“), then process each of those prefixes in parallel.

The world is your oyster.
I think you have a very different view of reality that we'll go nowhere with in conversation.
The point of open source is that you fork it and add this feature, and have to maintain the project yourself.
I tried a Big Tech diet. It didn't go well
Bruno has been taking root in our organization (displacing postman).

It was nice to find out about the for-pay golden edition in this thread to support Bruno’s efforts. The feature split for free vs Individuals vs Organizations seems well done.

As feedback to the Bruno team:

for Individuals - I most value the gRPC/websocket, then load-testing

for Organizations - My org would most value central license mgmt
Of course they can, why is this news? If you intend to use it anonymously why would you set a recovery email to something that identifies you?
Yes, much has changed since the time of Dave.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACfNSqsi_mE

Probably your last point is key. Even a little dab will do ya nowadays or you'll forget what I was talking about. Wait.
Right, I guess most of us used to, but we save a lot of money that way. Still, why waste money on energy when you don't have to? If you could invest some money on different, more efficient hardware?

Yeah, Thunderbolt would work. I use LAG on my NAS with 4x 1 gbit, I got some devices with USB-C to 2.5 gbit NIC, these are cheap (30 EUR or so). I'd then use that managed 10 gbit switch which I put off by default. If I'd need the speed, I'd put it on. Thunderbolt is even better (way faster and cheaper, multipurpose, though you'd need to set up TCP/IP over USB), but I prefer AMD over Intel.

If you want a TB4 one with Intel, there's many Intel NUCs available, very cheap on Ali. Many of the ones I saw not from Ali are just rebrands (some, admittedly, with Coreboot).
They mean that politics and ideology are what your boss is going by to determine whether to give you or your coworker a raise. Or at the least it plays a large part.

Even if you dont talk about politics you are subject to the forces of it.
But maybe having friends who smoke weed dramatically reduces your ability to assess your friends' assessment of their own cognitive ability.
Potentially life-saving sticker blows the whistle on post-surgical leaks
That's anthropocentrism limited thinking. For us, coming all the way here would be "a lot of trouble". We can't assume it's the same for them, however.
You’d just end up with shell companies with vague names obfuscating that they are actually part of “ACME global megacorp”
$50B mission to save Antarctica's 'Doomsday Glacier' from melting
OSI conformant license is the only definition of open source - the OSI coined and popularised the term - but you’re otherwise correct.
It’s indeed been about 100ns for a long time. Part of this is that memory is larger though, so there may be more decisions to make to look up a line (and those are made faster). And throughput has improved. Some consumer high-end desktop hardware (think gaming rather than workstation) can have lower latency ram.