skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Geez, that was rude. I don't think assuming that the literally first requirement mentioned conditions the rest is "hyper focusing." It seems prudent to assume the rest are conditioned on it. It's not outlandish to assume you have to be on that style of network to use it, especially since the pitch is to enterprises for secure file transfer.
Those who have children will never wonder what could have been.

Even a horrific outcome answers that question.

There is no other way to do do.
On free baby formula in the UK see https://novaramedia.com/2023/06/21/parents-are-having-to-ste...
Roku is retroactively forcing acceptance for devices, including televisions, not for media streaming/rental services.
I think these rules should apply to consoles too.

I never said how I felt about how the rules should be applied, I was just making a distinction between the two industries.

Stop em all from charging a percentage. All of em. Every industry.
Is there anything in humanity or the universe that isn't extractive at some level? Machinery, used oil or metal. Hell if you go all the way to solar or wood, you're still extracting energy from the sun which is extracting extracting energy from fusion.

Everything constructive is just refining entropy into something.
> one of my favorite things about DBeaver is that because it is implemented on Eclipse you can install nearly any Eclipse plugin and they work

I like DataGrip for a very similar reason, relative to IDEA plugins.
Please tell us more about these noted exponents of the national security state.
I built a pretty complex home automation system using a stack of raspberry pis and python code that largely came out of GPT4 and copilot. I had no previous python experience. Just came up with the idea as a way to get GPT4 to teach me something.
Sounds like "warning" from AIM
His early essays are life changing, in fact many of the early readers of HN, myself included, were drawn here by pg’s essays.

Last couple of ones - not so much.
Dredd (2013)
There’s another way to look at this - as the beginning of the construction of the Data Mesh: https://martinfowler.com/articles/data-mesh-principles.html

This can be seen as a “shift left” in data capabilities. The rise of Data Products ultimately democratizes access to data.
Wages went up because almost 3 million people retired or died during the pandemic in the US. This pulled forward structural demographics that we were already headed towards.

https://www.axios.com/2022/12/16/the-missing-workers-who-are...

https://www.wsj.com/economy/jobs/labor-supply-economy-jobs-c...
The implication is not that low IQ causes lead exposure, but that low IQ and lead exposure are both caused by a third factor, presumably poverty.
This is clear astroturf and you should be ashamed of your bald faced lies in these posts.
Transmission costs are what people forget. It takes a lot of money to buy, build, and maintain the equipment & land that carries your electricity from its source.
Makes you wonder how it is that power from the grid is so ludicrously above its actual capitol cost of production

Delivery charges, mostly -- it costs a lot of money to build and maintain a power grid. Wholesale prices in my state are around 4.5 cents/KWh, but delivered prices are much higher (around 33 cents/KWh depending on rate plan).
Given there's no hard source that this is their intended plan for their own store I would still count it as conjecture.
As use of A.I. soars, so does the energy and water it requires

https://e360.yale.edu/features/artificial-intelligence-clima...
The Organic Software Directory
Sure, but now you need a secondary channel outside of the infotainment system to notify people of critical safety issues. ie recalls
Fair enough.. that's a reasonable mark up.
Also, in the UK (or not), Lord Lucan
Note, YC is actively auto-muting much of this conversation.
Kate Middleton photo pulled on suspicion it's manipulated
I'd say it's based on a childhood of attempted indoctrination into a few Christian denominations, primarily by my Catholic parents. Comically enough, I told them I was an atheist when I was 7 years old, but either they think I forgot, or they forgot it themselves. Either way I went to the church and Sunday school for the required 18 years and did the rituals I was supposed to. Nowadays I just go with them once in awhile to keep them happy and I don't talk about it with them. I think mainly it was the science denial that other Christian denominations engage in that put me off the whole thing as a child, but as I learned more about the religion as I grew up, I also stopped believing that (almost) anyone really believes in them; few of the followers of Jesus seem to want to replicate his radical love and compassion.

Scientology just seems like one most people agree is unbelievable.
Compilers is a pretty small field, yes. Perhaps developer tooling in general might be a bigger pond? You could try some experiments: writing a language server or a debug server, look into some static analysis, something regarding software manifests?

Otherwise, looking at C++, there's work in finance, gaming, embedded, scientific computing, (and others) ... all quite different areas, with different skills and experiences that would be relevant. You might also think about which companies (or even countries) you'd like to work in, and consider where you'd fit.

Do some research on presentations for C++ conferences: where do the presenters work? Look at open source libraries -- who sponsors the projects? Where do the people work for their day jobs?

If nothing else, doing a bit of thinking and research will give you a good story for why you did a particular project, or tried for a particular internship. Almost anything is a better answer than "it fell in my lap and I had no other ideas" (or "some rando on HN suggested it", for that matter).
>You can easily accumulate depth of knowledge from reading in areas that are well documented.

Given that specific knowledge relevant to a field may be of a highly specific and hard to understand nature it increases the risk that any attempt to understand that knowledge by simply reading it will fail due to simple misunderstanding of what one reads.

In documenting things there are always points in which documenting minute details of a thing starts to detract from the purpose of documentation, that is to say the more in depth and detailed one documents the less readable the documentation becomes, therefore one leaves out things that should be easily understood by others when trying to use the documentation to actually work in the field or will quickly be imparted by other practitioners in the field if it is one with easy access to others.

Documentation by its nature is aimed at everyone, but there may be particular things that would be obvious to many people but not some specific person, and that specific person when reading the best documented guides to the area of knowledge will still not be as knowledgeable as they believe, because everybody is different.

Very many areas of knowledge have specific relation to things that people do with their bodies, martial arts, sex, cooking, etc. etc. In such cases there is of course muscle memory, thus no matter how precise and painstaking the documentation will be in these areas you will not be as knowledgeable as one that builds up muscle memory in the field by doing if you rely on only reading the documentation.

I could go on, but given my point about minute details it might be self-defeating.
Isn't that a bit of a cop-out though? They're just redefining the word "intelligence" to be something else (here, the ability to learn new things). That's fine and all, but that doesn't answer the question we actually care about, which is the absolute magnitude of the ability. It doesn't matter how "long" an entity took to learn, or how "efficient" they were in learning - at the end of the day, AlphaZero will crush Magnus.
Oh, so the Boston Lead Replacement Incentive program is based on benefits that may be entirely speculative? Might I encourage you to sample our finest tap water, from our finest century-old lead pipes? Oh, maybe another day then.
“If it comes from the country that they operate in. “

How’s that for privacy?
I'm not sure. From the description, it sounds like whatever rust does on one thread (compute + destructors) is split across multiple threads in Go (compute + gc), but it's not clear if the base computation workload is spread across multiple threads.

Thinking about the problem, I think that at the very least parsing could be parallelized. Assembling everything into one output might not be parallelizable. But I haven't looked at what happens in esbuild.

I do know that it's fast enough that when I switched from webpack I had to check that it actually did something, because it returned immediately.
PG's essays really have two topics: the nominal topic, and that PG is really really smart.

Sometimes I get the same impressions about PG as I do about Derek Sivers' essays: sometimes they are insightful, and sometimes I think they were the inspirations for the /r/IAmVerySmart subreddit.
It might be now? Honestly, it probably is, given the reworks.

But the problem with the Eight, at least initially, was the way the suppliers were organized. Or, more specifically, how they weren't organized. Boeing had flushed through a half dozen generation of Systems Engineers in the aughties, and no one really had a half chance to get familiar with anything that was laid down before. Suppliers generally took their best guess and went with it - that's where we were, at the time, because it proved completely impossible to make any contact with a person at Boeing who knew what the FMS data bus was . . or, on most days, even what a FMS data bus was. So we guessed either ARINC429 or ARINC664 and got (mostly!!) lucky.

There were also some . . ah, I don't want to say "bad" . . so let's say, "non-technical" SEs . . who advocated for their own vision vis a vis SE and supplier management. In short, this was a giant mish mish, and, speaking for myself, it colored my personal perception of Systems Engineering as a discipline to this day. While you get some real SE rockstars, you also get an epidemic of shysters with mild sociopathy, and it takes good, technical leadership to tell one from the other.

Keep in mind this was . . sheesh . . almost two decades ago, so take it all with a grain of salt.
So techically you agree that it’s no different from using proton?

Coming back to the question, the roads you travel, the vehicle you commute are all under constant surveillance, FYI.
Athletics have refs and a score and rules all simple enough to sort winners from losers. Papers don't. The analogy is flawed.
I don't know if there is true continuity. As we age our memories become memories of memories. Just as we don't see the nose between our eyes I think our brains turn a stuttered disjointed consciousness into what seems like a continuous stream.

It's like walking into a room and forgetting why you walked in there.
"Are there too many options in the nav bar making users overwhelmed?"

Exactly this. A lot of people wont even bother scanning the drop down list of options for more than a couples seconds it seems. It would be nice to know how wide spread of an issue this is.

" What widespread implications are you thinking of? "
Basically they type in where the want to go, or what they want to do, and the search bar takes them to the exact page directly. No UI, just an api.
Yes. Love this cross platform, non proprietary software for local file sharing.
>It takes about 4.5 hours for me to go door to door from my house in Seattle to our office in San Francisco

Not enough founders are moving at one hundred and seventy nine miles per hour anymore but I guess that’s what happens when the fed jacks up interest rates
I just recently had to read this to understand enough to implement a USB device on a PIC32, but there's still some more clarifying info I'd like to see.

For example, there's almost no information anywhere online on how the polling is supposed to work for noticing interrupt requests from the device. Is this typically handled at the OS level and the application writer does not mess with it? I still don't know.

The reason I ask is because while trying to implement USB on my PIC32, I observed USB traffic via wireshark of another third party custom HID device that I was trying to mimic. This device, once you pressed a button on it, wireshark would show INTERRUPT IN requests coming from the device, without any programs open. However with my own USB device implementation, I couldn't get this to happen, no matter how hard I tried. I just happen to try opening the USB device from an application and trying to read from it, at which point my interrupt IN transfers magically showed up in wireshark and starting working. I still don't understand why that's necessary when my third-party device can do it all by itself.
Arbitration, even if it were fair (which it isn't, of course) is completely superfluous because (at least in the US) you're expected to already have attempted resolution outside the court system. The civil court system is the place of last resort for dispute resolution; you can't just immediately sue someone without the judge asking how you've attempted to resolve things.

There's this myth that the US is 'overly litigious' and it used to be that the McDonalds coffee burn case was cited as an example.

McDonalds knew they were serving well above industry standard temperatures for coffee, and I believe there had been other injuries.

The plaintiff (who was horrifically burned in her crotch) asked McDonalds only to be compensated for medical expenses for the initial medical treatment - she didn't ask for a dime in continuing/future medical expenses, pain/suffering despite enormous pain that was likely to continue for a while, not to mention the obvious lifelong problems with having, well, her gentils melted.

McDonalds refused that, figuring she'd either go away or they'd outspend her in court.

Which enraged the jury, and resulted in the massive punitive damages awarded to the plaintiff.

That brings me to the second point: the reason these arbitration clauses are popping up is because corporations are increasingly breaking laws / causing damages to people in pursuit of ever greater profit margins, and getting sued for it.

...which is exactly how things are supposed to work.

Maybe they should try not fucking people over.
Just more marketing for a bubble. Can we stop with the AI nonsense? It’s as annoying as NFTs were.
For Go: https://www.josekipedia.com/
i read this comment...and thought "surely not thru-zero quadrature VCO donald tillman"? surely enough...you were :)
It’s funny, because while technically correct, you may end up fundamentally wrong that there was a limit to the value we might find in parallel compute. After all, we may have lie of sight to AGI through parallel scale alone.
Text-only, no Javascript, works where archive.today is blocked:

x=https://www.economist.com/asia/2024/02/22/japanese-men-have-an-identity-crisis

wget -U "" -qO/dev/stdout $x \
grep -Eo "data\":\"[^}]+\","\|name\":\"p \
|sed 's/data\":\"//;s/\",$//;
s/name\":\"p/@@/s;/@\{4\}//' \
|tr -d '\12' \
|tr @ '\12' \
|fmt > 1.txt
less 1.txt
Come on. Its a free offering. As the saying goes, you get what you pay for!
Anyone can wonder what might have been - those with 2 children could wonder how more would have changed their lives, or could wonder what might have been had they had none. Some changes we make to our lives forever close off other paths.
Thanks for the heads-up.

I just installed it and it's the most most hassle-free experience I ever had with this type of apps.

My only gripe with it is that I need the receiving device awake and the app on the foreground (at least on android) for it to work. Even with the quick save option activated.

I wish quick share (né nearby share) was available on linux (even if via chrome).
The terms changed for a device already paid for up front, not a monthly subscription. That’s the particular rub here.
The article says he estimates that the tilt/tracking system will improve power output by 20-25%. Doesn't he already know what it will do? It seems like he should have tested that out by now and be prepared to share that data.
You mean like how you learned from others? Against their will?
System design of a workflow management system
> All forms of socialism involve slavery.

They don't.
Not sure why you were downvoted but I can only imagine it might because folks mistook what you said? I don't know.

Suspension is a punishment only in that it removes them from the environment so they cannot harm others. The legal system will need to be involved. All of that said, these kids seem to be quite young. I doubt much will actually happen to them legally - and that's probably fine. As long as the kids learn their lesson and never do it again. I hope this also is used as a teaching moment for everyone that we now need to contend with images that are created not only of adults but of children.
Source-available Rust-based RAG
One of the first heavy uses of Rust in AI that I have seen
No Heidi is pretty unstable compared to what it used to be. I get 2 or 3 exceptions that require me to restart daily, the good thing is that the exceptions are caught, and you can copy out any SQL you have been working on which means you rarely loose work.

I still prefer it as it is fast and has a nice UI and if they can sort the crashes, I would be a convert.
Moving abroad remains the best "increase your salary" hack.
> If you're willing to do a lot of rewriting, you don't have to guess right. You can follow a branch and see how it turns out, and if it isn't good enough, cut it and backtrack. I do this all the time.

I feel like even if you guess right, you can't help but do a lot of rewriting and exploration because otherwise you'll always feel that "something's missing", and that you're further from the truth than you could be, that there's a better explanation around the corner if you study this subtree a bit more.

In the process of an essay I'm currently writing, I've probably written a short book of meandering thoughts / notes. I can't imagine it any other way because doing so would be imagining me actively not exploring an interesting subtree / implication of something I wrote, that I feel could impact the crux of the essay.

And of course none of this is wasted effort, as PG talks also mentions. Identifying the next essays from those ideas I've left out of this one is simply an act of observation and organization based on the exploration I've already done.

And likely when I start the next essay, this process will repeat itself.
They can do that now. No one wants that. (At least not until the thoughtcrime boys step in.)
Ad-hoc kernel extensions were a pretty common answer, and one thing a lot of people love about eBPF is that it subsumes most of the reasons people wrote lkms commercially.
My "Internet OS": Day 1 vs. Day 1095
Get a grip, you've drunk the Kool-Aid.
I don’t think I understand the logic behind laying off sales while emphasizing profitability as the reason. Without sales teams how will the product make money? Is the idea that the company has enough existing enterprise customers? Or customers are flocking to the product organically?

Overall I think this announcement leads to more questions.
Sounds a lot like the morality police in Iran.
They have the best privacy policy ever: https://localsend.org/#/privacy
You must understand that teenagers have a limited amount of time outside of school.
I'm struck by the parallelism between this process of writing the best essay, and the process of developing a successful startup. Both require starting with a good question, that sets the upper bound for the value to be created. Both require curiosity, and hopefully to reveal some unintuitive insight. Both are functions of their time, what is a good startup today is not timeless much as what makes a good essay today is not timeless. And so on...
I’m not a particularly religious person but I’m running to Jesus if the future of the world includes worshipping LLMs, tyvm.

This is absolutely absurd. The model has been trained on thousands of lines of ai short stories. No wonder it parrots back its “consciousness”. We are just staring at a reflection of our own creative writing.
I'm not aware of any active piping of petroleum over the Atlantic.

There were major pipelines built both on the American mainland (the Big Inch and Little Big Inch pipelines), due to an overwhelming toll of German Kriegsmarine U-Boat attacks on US domestic oil shipments (New Orleans to New Jersey, largely, Project Paukenschlag).

And there was Operation Pluto which ran a 9" pipeline across the English Channel, delivering fuel from Britain to the European mainland.

Trans-Atlantic oil shipments however were by tanker to the best of my knowledge.

I'm relying strongly on Daniel Yergin's account of the oil industry during WWII (along with WWI, an absolutely fascinating episode), covered in his 1990 book The Prize. Despite differing strongly with Yergin over the future of oil and the oil industry, I unreservedly recommend this book as a masterful history of its past.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Inch>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Pluto>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Prize:_The_Epic_Quest_for_...>
> The deeper problem is that Apple has created a framework that encourages surveillance capitalism. Developers who finance their apps by monetizing user data do not have to pay any fees or commissions whatsoever. Meta, for example, can distribute WhatsApp through the App Store without paying a single cent, while apps with a privacy-friendly business model are forced to pay up.

This I totally agree with. The rest is just a belief that Santa Claus will bring a pony for Christmas, and the DMA just doesn't go that far.
You can opt out of the new contract by mailing a paper letter to Roku with a paper copy of your physical receipt for the device you bought years ago. Sounds like a perfectly normal way for a technology company to get feedback in the 1980s.
One does not need to consume additional resources for growth.

One can can instead use resources better to produce more valuable stuff (intensive growth).

The question is if there is a limit to the value of things we can produce with finite resources - and the answer is likely no - at least not in any kind of human timescale.
No, because AI training is not human learning.