skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is a huge issue. What's the point of doing replication studies (which we need) if folks just don't care about the result.

It's heavy handed, but I think every time a study fails to reproduce its results, every single published paper that uses that refuted study is notified, the authors get 6 months with a warning banner on top of the article, and if a correction is not submitted, it's automatically removed.

Science isn't supposed to be easy. We need a system that prioritizes high quality output, not volume.
This is why Apple didn't bother to implement E2EE for iCloud Mail, Calendar, and Contacts for Advanced Data Protection. It was just never meant for privacy, and any implementation would just have backdoors everywhere.
> But surely you need to track that elsewhere anyway?

Why? If the S3 structure and listing is sufficient, I don't need to store anything else anywhere else.

Many use cases may involve other requirements that S3 can't meet, such as being able to find the same object via different keys, or being able to search through the metadata fields. However, if the requirements match up with S3's structure, then additional services are unnecessary and keeping them in sync with S3 is more hassle than it's worth.
There's also the circle star used in APL, U235f. And U2363, or star diaeresis.
It takes too much work to verify everything in every field personally, you wouldn't be able to move at all. The problem is a complete lack of interest in any tools that would inform people about this, because entire industries and fields are built by bad papers.

We seem to have a lot of hypertext systems that keep track of citations. Seems like it would be cheap at this point to put a black mark on papers that don't replicate, and to propagate that black mark to every paper that references the bad paper without also referencing the failed replication. Put a big red X over the abstracts.
Sorry, but what exactly is misleading on that page? Over and over again it says that the content of your email is encrypted. It's very specific about that, and it's hard to see how someone would misinterpret that to include the account recovery email address.

Is that claim itself not accurate?
Stay away from kittens. Never entertain kittens.
It’s safe to assume that companies are always greedy, it’s in their nature. That’s why we need competition between companies. The alternative is regulation but companies tend to love regulation as regulatory capture is easier than real competition.

I think systems that presuppose non-greedy companies are just as fanciful as those that presuppose non corrupt governments.
“It looks like you're
writing a letter. Would you like help?”

That didn’t go down so well in the past.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_Assistant
AlKhawarizmi lived in Baghdad and was head Astronomer of the House of Wisdom there. Persia and Mesopotamia (modern-day Iraq) were under one political entity, along with Arabia, the Levant (modern-day Palestine, Syria, Jordan, and Lebanon), Egypt, and others. Even today, many Muslims identify with their faith more than their race, ethnicity, or nationality.
The Mysterious Death of the Namesake of the Douglas Fir
> Once you start parallelising the ListObjectV2 (rather than sequentially "continuing")

How are you "parallelizing" the ListObjectsV2? The continuation token can be only fed in once the previous ListObjectsV2 response has completed, unless you know the name or structure of keys ahead of time, in which listing objects isn't necessary.
New NetBSD BulkTracker Release
OP: https://mastodon.sdf.org/@bentsukun

New NetBSD BulkTracker release. Packages that failed to build now include a list of failed dependencies (if any) and packages broken by them (if any).
That opens up an option. You could design a text program that gives both parties the ability to impose a cooldown timer on the other's box. I wonder when an AI would forcibly lock your own box to deliver a message.

Maybe this would be useful if it predicts you're about to say something incriminating.
Those aren’t the many I saw.
Refuted paper does not mean retracted, and therefore won't stop being cited.
If they had to label the ingredients on an apple, you wouldn’t understand all those words either.
Hi there! The Honda Civic was a sample car so that you can try out the platform without having to add a car first. But you can absolutely add your own car, and you can add up to 2 cars with a free account, and I'm happy to extend the limit also for your account to try out.
oh but amazon offers SFTP on top of S3 so you don't have to miss out.
"promotion" is a professional service yer suppose to purchase, see? Like Medicine, Advertising is too fiercely dangerous to allow anyone to indulge in it. It should be reserved for the Sober Professionals who are Better Than the Rest Of Us.
I think you just misunderstand how bad inflation really is. Costs have risen by conservative estimates 18.7% since 2020. When your money is worth 18.7% less, anything less than an increase in "profit" of 18.7% dollar value is actually a loss because the value of the numbers has changed.
And how is that strategy working out? Because lots and lots of countries have more humane justice systems and are safer. But I guess throwing more people in jail than the Soviet Union had in gulags can’t fail, only we can fail at throwing more people in jail.
YOLOv5 is pretty widely used, and it can be useful to get efficient compute at the edge.

Disclosure: I work for a Tenstorrent customer.
Let me clarify. I’m asking what you think the bulk of the existing busy work consists of
"Organising Genius" – a reading list
Probably never due to the poor perceived user experience (it could be better UX in practice, like sometimes being rude to an entitled customer may be actually helpful for them, but it's not generally perceived this way by the customer).

Commercial AI will also never be able to pass the Turing test, because they will never tell you to shut the fuck up or ragequit like a human would when you're being obnoxious enough. It's not a technical limitation, it just aligns very poorly with the interest of the overlord.

Or maybe Mistral will do it, because having no particular consideration for customers is something we French people know how to do very well.
Okay, but the question is more interesting if we consider machines with >= 32gb, rather than models which have strangely small amounts of memory.

Edit: Also, TFA is clearly written with servers in mind, although I think the implications are interesting for e.g. your average laptop user installing Linux and wondering how much hard drive space to give up.
> Most proprietary products have very little worth passing down, because they change every six months, which they have to do to keep making money.

I, too, got annoyed when Microsoft Office introduced the ribbon interface and moved everything around, but that's ridiculous. Entire industries standardize around proprietary software packages. Photoshop, Autocad, Resolume, Avid, Matlab, After Effects. Just because some stuff gets moved around doesn't mean people can't teach classes on how to do things with that tool. The screenshots just get outdated so you update the materials and keep on teaching.
Go after the executives and management who made the decisions.
For it to be a good interjection and not feel like a dumb AI that is just babbling in the background, it would need to have proper timing, and relevant information that includes a model of the minds of people talking. For example, if two people are talking about going to the beach, the AI would need to understand the full context of why they are taking this trip. If the trip is just to enjoy the sun, the AI could have something useful to say on that matter, or if the trip is about surfing, the AI would also factor that in, but the crucial point is that this context is not just listening to keywords or predicting the next token. There would need to be several layers of AI, one layer for predicting subject matter, one layer for predicting intention, another layer for predicting the state of the world that is relevant for that conversation, in addition to the layer of predicting word by word what the response is.
The existence of platforms that do not conform to their own specifications does not make an operator non-deterministic.

Edit: I found this pretty great article on the subject https://randomascii.wordpress.com/2013/07/16/floating-point-...

We're both right, depending on how you frame the question.
Regulated monopolies are generally quite successful in lobbying their regulators to end up with regulatory capture. Then you end up with the worst of both worlds with no possibility of a competitor to displace them.
We might get the answers soon. If Boeing really wants to buy Spirit we might see Airbus’ exposure. That said, it wouldn’t be unheard them building for each other. Pretty sure Airbus manufactured parts for Boeing and vice versa in the past.
What people draw today is far less interesting because we have had global cross pollination via print for hundreds of years and the internet for decades. Where people draw inspiration and learn the mechanics of drawing is obvious

These figurines are interesting because of the large geographical and temporal distribution long before humans even invented writing.

However I think this article is overselling the similarities between the hundreds of figures found.
This is a common refrain, but if this was a requirement science would absolutely grind to a halt. There is just too much science being done. And in some fields, what scientists publish is generally sound, if incremental (and maybe of dubious importance).

I think the tradeoff we have taken is "lots of science, mostly good" vs "little science, 100% correct". Similar tradeoff is taken with software & wikipedia, for example.

Or do you apply the same rigorous standards to, say, software? Should every piece of software that is publicly distributed be thoroughly reviewed for correctness?
Many years ago, I went a similar route and built a small T1D monitoring stack from scratch for myself. It even pretended to be a Dexcom Follow client so I could get CGM from Dexcom in near real-time. When Dexcom eventually changed their internal APIs and broke my data ingestion, I decided to finally give Nightscout a shot. I've never looked back since.

As I see it, the big advantage of Nightscout is that it is a de facto standard interface, with many integrations already existing. And it's easy to build add-on apps on top of its API. I've built about four myself [0], [1] and there is a big community of users and developers building other things such as [2], [3], [4]...

Even though Nightscout is a little bit messy and requires MongoDB, it's surprisingly easy to self-host. I'm using the stock docker-compose file from the main repo with only minor modifications. I run it on a $6/mo VPS. As an alternative, there are two or three hosted Nightscout services costing little more than that.

I highly recommend you to consider going this "standard" Nightscout route because it can save you work (and worries) in the future, and you get to connect with the community around it. In my experience, going all alone from the start was not worth it.

[0] https://github.com/vitawasalreadytaken/koboscout
[1] https://github.com/vitawasalreadytaken/glucoscape
[2] https://github.com/kashamalasha/nightscout-widget-electron
[3] https://github.com/mlukasek/M5_NightscoutMon
[4] https://customtypeone.com/products/sugarpixel
>Everybody does bring their political beliefs to work, and it manifests in things like how they interact with their colleagues and customers.

Not it doesn't. How people interact with others at work is a function of their personality and professionalism at their job, not a function of their political color.

If someone at work is being a dick, it only shows that he's a dick, but political junkies will try to justify that it must be because he's of the opposite political beliefs they have, because in their head "all those people behave like that".
I think this is a great idea, and makes a lot of sense.

It’s a paper cut, but I get annoyed waiting for GPT to finish when I know the output is misdirected.

Ironically - since it’s not a person - hitting “stop” feels too abrasive so I usually wait until the output completes.
Grayskull supports FP8, FP16, BFP16, VFP2, BFP4, BFP8 [0], and some sort of 19-bit floating point in the SFPU. [1]

I don't know how and with what performance those are supported.

FP4 has 221 TFLOPS on the Grayskull e75, and 332 TFLOPS on the Grayskull e150. [0]

While wormhole has 82 INT8 TOPS per card. [2]

I haven't found any other numbers.

Edit: Some more info about data formats: https://docs.tenstorrent.com/tenstorrent/v/tt-buda/dataforma...

[0] https://docs.tenstorrent.com/tenstorrent/add-in-boards-and-c...

[1] https://tenstorrent-metal.github.io/tt-metal/latest/tt_metal...

[2] https://tenstorrent.com/systems/galaxy/
ZSTD Is Impressive: A Real-World Example
No more Pushkin, Dostoyevsky, or Tolstoy: Ukrainian libraries clean out shelves
Interesting project, basically a wrapper too around openai gym-like functionality that can handle open llms.
I have the truck on standby.
Check this out. "Negative Latency" :)
https://twitter.com/yoheinakajima/status/1762718034761072653
That's already the case for any dynamic languages, and it's just down to whether you write your code to be flexible about inputs. E.g

def int(i) = i.respond_to(:call) ? i.call : i.to_i

def f(i) = int(i) * 2

f in this case can take both ints and lambdas or anything call-able.

In practice we'd usually do this via any of the normal conversion methods like expecting the caller to support to_i etc., and bear the complexity for us as needed unless there's a really compelling reason to think the caller will often want to defer the evaluation past the call site and into the method itself.

That's usually very obvious when you come across it, like e.g. if the argument is expected to come from a remote source, but as long as the API for how the method uses the value is clear, substituting the value for a deferred calculation is easy.
Furthermore, it doesn't appear that they're looking at whether the reason the paper was cited was the subject of the failed replication.

To analogize to the legal field, which they mention in the article, if a case I cite is good law on one point of law, but no longer good law on another I may cite it as _Plaintiff v. Defendant_, 123 F.3d 456 (1998) (reversed on other grounds, _Defendant v. Plaintiff_ 78 S.Ct. 910 (2000))

Just because one finding in a paper wasn't replicated doesn't mean that the paper can't or shouldn't be cited for other findings.
> Send 1K bytes over 1 Gbps network = 44ns

Doubt.
I propose this game intends to point directly at Factorio as a dressed-up incremental game, with all the negativity that implies.

Someone once suggested to me that Factorio was a classical example of a non-programming weekend hobby.

That sounds like banal small talk, and it was. But it hit me hard. Why would pseudo-programming with no actual payoff or learning along the way be desirable over...just doing what you want, programming?
sin(x) is platform-dependent.
They can wake up earlier and go to bed earlier. Nothing prevents them from utilizing the sunlight due to a nominal time designation. But the time designation changes the structure of all activity unrelated to sunlight for no obvious reason other than “I don’t want to wake up an hour earlier to get that extra hour of sunlight.”
“The Bleeding Edge” on Netflix introduced me to this idea. It’s kind of terrifying that a huge amount of our medical system is built upon this.
Criminal negligence is the act of knowingly creating a dangerous situation. Of course, it’s extremely difficult to prosecute that “knowingly” part.

Though I’d argue a reinterpretation of that is in order: as a company exec, it is negligent to not know what is going on within your company.
The phrase "best-efforts to avoid non-combatant deaths" is _extremely_ load-bearing in your post.

Israel is locked into a multigenerational existential conflict with people who utterly hate their guts for just existing. Similar feelings have developed on their side. Claiming that Israel cares about not killing Palestinian civilians is utterly laughable, especially given the news.
Take this with a grain of salt because I'm not super well read on llms, but isn't their entire function built on prediction?

Sounds like a reasonable approach could be to have a separate "channel" which focuses entirely on the concept of "where is this conversation going?" could give a pretty good baseline for when and how to interject.
Thanks for creating this!
There are cereals with lots of fiber that help save off constipation.
Were yout not concerned about the privacy implications of uploading your child's sensitive halth data to a private LLM?
So you’re saying that it’s a problem when multiple companies are trying to make a profit?

I know that profit is a foreign concept to most VC backed tech companies, but it’s pretty fundamental to everybody else
> Side note: all the profs are those who made it, so their advice about how to make it is like taking financial advice from lottery winners.

Or taking business advice from successful entrepreneurs. Everyone is looking for the magical advice—The Formula. But there is none. You can execute perfectly and still lose. You can also bumble through without trying and succeed. You can grow up in the wrong country. You can have the right parents. So much is out of our control. We almost always underestimate the outsized role luck and chance play in our endeavors.
https://huggingface.co/01-ai/Yi-34B
All the widely anticipated games have more than enough folks nowadays willing to endure through janky private alphas and betas. So much so that it's common for a lot of bugs identified in later beta stages to not even be fixed.

So a large QA team is only needed nowadays for games that nobody is really that hyped about, or games that cannot risk any chance of plot-lines/art leaking before release.
Random note: Has anyone noticed how fast the author's webpage is? I know it's static, but I mean it's fast even for the DNS lookup. I would love to know what they have on.
Sorry - this was a draft that I published accidentally while fixing a typo in another article and which someone apparently submitted it here before I could take it down.

It should 404 now. Perhaps next week :)
Where did you get the 700% from? A 700% is x8. I bought most of the food using credit card, and the total of the month is increasing, but not x8, not even by x2.
While it's true that the report doesn't specifically mention each reported UAP incident like Nimitz or Gimbal by name, the conclusions reached by the report do imply that such incidents were studied and considered, and said conclusion is that they do not, in fact, defy current explanation:

AARO assesses that the incidents of UAP sightings reported to USG organizations, the
claims that some constitute extraterrestrial craft, and the claims that the USG has secured and
is experimenting on alien technology, most likely are the result of a range of cultural,
political, and technological factors.

AARO bases this conclusion on the aggregate findings of
all USG investigations to date, the misinterpretation of all reported named sensitive programs,
the lack of empirical evidence to support the USG reverse-engineering narrative, and AARO’s
assessment that the piece of metal alleged to be recovered from an alien spacecraft in the late
1940s is ordinary, of terrestrial origin, and possesses no exceptional qualities.
The parent comment to the one you're replying to described this as a "fundamental issue"
I don't understand why we are getting LLMs to generate code to create fuzzing data as a 'thing'

Logically LLMs should be quite good at creating the fuzzing data.

To state the obvious why, it's too expensive to use LLMs directly and this way works since they found "4 memory safety bugs and one hang"

But the future we are heading to should be LLMs will directly pentest/test the code. This is where it's interesting and new.
Uhh...I don't have sources but I'd imagine humans prayed to _something_ before they went mammoth hunting or picking berries long before farming.
The Github repository, gives a better introduction/howto:

https://github.com/01-ai/yi

> Yi-34B-Chat model landed in second place (following GPT-4 Turbo), outperforming other LLMs (such as GPT-4, Mixtral, Claude) on the AlpacaEval Leaderboard (based on data available up to January 2024).

> Yi-34B model ranked first among all existing open-source models (such as Falcon-180B, Llama-70B, Claude) in both English and Chinese on various benchmarks, including Hugging Face Open LLM Leaderboard (pre-trained) and C-Eval (based on data available up to November 2023).
Yi models are available for download [1], so no, this isn’t a wrapper around GPT-4.

[1]: https://huggingface.co/01-ai/Yi-34B
For example, you can do separate parallel ListObjectV2 for files starting a-f and g-k, etc.. covering the whole key space. You can parallelize recursively based on what is found in the first 1000 entries so that it matches the statistics of the keys. Yes there may be pathological cases, but in practice we find this works very well.
I agree, Google should fire everyone involved in the development of mass surveillance tools that are sold to the highest bidding government. It's immoral and highly unethical.
I think there's a number of aspects to that, including cloaking, potentially dimension traveling, and other artefacts such as huge numbers of tracks on advanced radar.

Definitely they are cloaked, or invisible. Besides the support of corroboration with our hypothesis explaining crashes, this is also supported by inconsistent visual confirmation for objects seen on radar, or FLIR. Sometimes people can see these radar/FLIR tracks with their eyes, sometimes not. People have also reported seeing them fade out, or instantly disappear.

Some amount of this invisibility could be due to teleporting, going through subspace, going to another dimension, or something else we don't really understand so well, rather than just optical camouflage.

Other artefacts are an interesting aspect, too. In such large numbers, we'd expect them to be picked up very frequently on advanced radars used by Earth's militaries. However, militaries have demonstrated a clear policy of withholding information that arises from these classified sensor platforms in order to protect the secrecy of their capabilities. In other words, they've basically admitted to the public that even if they were detecting them with advanced radar in large numbers, they wouldn't be telling us.

If we imagine them moving by teleporting discretely from point to point (with say a maximum jump distance of a few tens of km) rather than moving continuously, it could explain many things about both their anomalous "non interacting, transmedia, high speed, maneuverability", and also that, if they were so crowded, their 'traffic lanes' would also be sparse in motion as they skip large distance by moving discretely.
You're right that it won't work for all use cases, but starting two threads with prefixes A and M, for example, is one way you might achieve this.
I’ve used machines with hundreds of GBs of RAM that crash without at least a couple GBs of swap.
Maybe publication websites should be required to add a mark “Refuted by: <other paper>” in the PDF, similar to how RFCs have “Superseded by” and “Updated by”.
What do you think “highly processed” is?

I find the process used to make spam objectionable. You know, as in processed foods? And ham, which is itself a processed ingredient.

It’s fully cured and cooked pork. I don’t understand how that’s not highly processed. The only level below that is ultraprocessed foods like cheetohs and dorritos.
We need a negative KPI for parts that fall off and people that die due to negligent shortcuts.
Virtual size does not imply swap. You can have a gigantic virtual space with few realized pages.
True, however in the past we didn’t have LLMs. I would pay good money for a Clippy powered by a capable LLM.