skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't understand why so many people refuse to wear seatbelts unless demanded. Had everyone been buckled in I doubt anyone would have been injured. You are in a metal tube doing almost the speed of sound tens of thousands of feet in the air. Keep the belt on.

If you have to get up, keep a hand on something. An airliner cannot pull serious negative gs. You aren't going to be "pinned" to the ceiling. But you should hold to something solid just in case things get a little floaty for a few seconds. Most longtime fliers have witnessed their drinks lift of their trays. The floating doesn't hurt. The issue is when things stop floating and come crashing down.
Thomson Reuters has $8B war chest for AI-focused deals, says chief
Which is a large part of the sentiment behind brexit, though not the only one.
He did. Or, rather, he has been, for a long time well before Brexit.

https://theconversation.com/how-brexit-threatens-britains-fo...

https://foodresearch.org.uk/publications/food-and-brexit/

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/mar/22/tim-lang...

https://sussex.figshare.com/articles/report/A_food_Brexit_ti...

Have you done any basic research or even bare-minimum Googling before making a comment?
So you have a supply of water at 50°F - that’s 10°C (an optimistic temperature in many places). And you are using it to try to maintain a body temperature around 37°C. Let’s assume you do so by transferring heat from your body into the water enough to raise its temperature by 25°C - that’s probably overly optimistic given that it will also be warmed by the environment and the rate of transfer will be reduced as the temperature increases, but it’s a working number.

The specific heat capacity of water is about 4kJ/kg/°C so a liter of that cold water can absorb 100kJ of energy in the process of warming up. Once it’s warmed up it can’t do any more cooling.

Your body, when not working hard, produces about 200W of heat. That’s 200J per second.

So that liter of water can absorb your body’s heat output from about 500 seconds of being alive. That’s a little over eight minutes.

So that means the cooling needs for one human for one day can be met by about 170 liters of cold, 50°F water. That’s about 44 US Gallons.

If, however, that water can evaporate - well, the latent heat capacity of vaporization of water is over 2 thousand kJ per kg.

That’s why the wet bulb temperature matters. If water can’t evaporate, that cold water can’t absorb body heat except by just warming up.
I am from Northern Ireland at the heart of this confusion. I think Veda Bread should be marked as Not For EU. I am sure this alone would encourage immigration to our little island.
"What if we go in da winter, when da Sun is cold?" - Ali G
Nevertheless they both now are supposedly at SSJ God tier or above which just continues the nonsense.
In Germany at least it depends on the type of bus. Long distance / travel busses (Google translates it to "coach") are required to have seatbelts, regular "city busses" don't.
Surprise, surprise, the commission can't follow it's own regulations.

I hope they also hold the Commission and member state governments to account w.r.t. regulation 2016/679 (more commonly known as GDPR).

Not because I care very much about personal data, but because knowing how things are done in civil service organizations, all government business will grind to a halt for a decade or so.
My apologies. You are correct indeed.
Magit is built on such a framework. It is called 'transient' an Emacs Lisp library.
The earth is 4.5 billion years old. Over those billions of years, the sun has gotten ~40% hotter, which counteracted the reduced atmospheric greenhouse effect. We can't directly compare our current climate to billions of years ago with just atmospheric conditions.

Also, I notice you said "plants have thrived", and not "major staple crops have thrived". Toxic algae bloom has its own sort of natural beauty I guess, but rice and wheat are both temperate crops and won't be able to grow near the equator if it gets much hotter.

Please note that while hotter temps would warm up croplands near the poles, heat is not light and the tropics are so valuable for farming because they receive more light, not because they're hotter.
The standard you refer at is at a lower level in the "stack": it is mainly about how a terminal would handle drawing stuff on screen or how user input will be communicated back to the server.

The CUA standard is at a higher level in the "stack": it is about the user interface commands, shortcut keys, etc a program will provide as to have a user interface that users will already have some idea how to work with based on their existing knowledge of having worked with other programs that follow CUA. Things like using Shift+Ins to paste text for example, pressing F1 would show help, F5 would refresh the currently viewed contents (if that makes sense), F10 would open the menu, Enter activate a dialog box's default action, Escape cancels of the dialog box, etc.

These are not mutually exclusive - or even related really. You can have a program that uses the VT100 to implement a CUA interface.
This is quite the misleading wording. Britains own standards remain largely unchanged, meaning that they did not reimplement the standards enforced by the eu via national law. It follows that the standards are lower than pre brexit.

/edit: apparently I stand corrected.
Why Is My Electric Vehicle Dead? Check the 12-Volt Battery
Because Minnesota is a cold place. Many of the places where 'wet bulb' events are most likely to happen have only hot water available.

The tap water in Phoenix can exceed 100 degrees, people will fill a bathtub in the morning so their home A/C and evaporation will cool it off by the evening.

Even river water in India or Southeast Asia can exceed 100 degrees. There is no cold water to wet the rag with unless you have a deep well or refrigeration.
Not exact same issue, but one with similar symptoms to the "reboot every 51 days" one for 787.

Reading deeper, I'm more worried about how there's no patch for the Boeing issue still, at least I can't find one in FAA AD database, I assumed there would be one already... (the affected A350 had a software patch available at the time AD for "reboot before 148 hours" was issued)
It does, but it also still exports to the EU. This kind of label is more of "we can't be arsed with getting a full certification for this product" and the mix of taxation with the head-in-the-sand solution to where the Northern Ireland customs checks go.

Quite a lot of people spoke of both of these, loudly, between the vote and the implementation. Their concerns were not only ignored, they were derided for bring it up.
Have you tried magit with making it use $EDITOR for commit messages?
https://archive.ph/K6rSm
This isn’t remotely new and it’s unfortunate they didn’t seem to give much effort to describe real reasons why children might choose to stop communicating with their parents.

Abusive parents, alcoholics and drug addicts, etc. These are not uncommon things.
git commit -am 'commit message'
There are occasionally "air holes" happening near my local airport. A friend onboard a particularly severe one told me that the captain said that they'd "fallen" some 160 meters.
I also have another friend who, a long time ago, didn't use the seatbelt on a domestic flight - sudden turbulence made him hit his head and injure his neck badly. That's very dangerous. Personally the "worst" I've seen was just enough to break wine bottles in the overhead in front of me. Flight attendants gave out blankets for all of us nearby, as protection for dripping wine..
"Documentary" may be a bit of a strong word. It's more of an image film / ad for Cilium and/or the ebpf foundation.
Disconnect the antenna or the whole modem itself.
Its unsurprising that its all likely human origin, particularly the testing of advanced aircraft the military is developing.

The double sided coin is these are the kinds of articles that UFO folks expect to see: rational arguments against their own that paint them as "true believers".

While I personally do not believe the US government, or any government entity, is holding onto any advanced extra-terrestrial secrets of any nature, largely due to how poorly secrets can be kept, especially over time, things always find their way out one way or another.

I do think the government didn't do itself any favors on messaging that fuels so much of the conspiracy thinking around it in the US.

I will say, I wish we spent more money on probing space for extraterrestrial civilizations. It would be a massive game changer, and I'm personally okay with the inherent risks.
Not a lot, but the point is that EU rules do not apply at all. If they want a certain standard, they need to change British regulations.
The 787 is one of the best airliners ever made. It's been flying more than a decade without a single hull loss. In the first decade the 747 had several non-terrorism related hull losses. The 737 MAX is newer and already has two hull losses.
Yes, there is not enough democracy in the world, just like with the UKs house of lords or the US supreme court. Unelected people making important decisions isn't democratic. Also this Electoral College thing in the US. People should be able to directly vote for the US president instead of an "Electoral College". One person, one vote.

Ursula von der Leyen wants to be relected, but people in the EU are not asked about this. If find this highly suspicious.

I also for example find the UKs habit suspicious, where the change of a prime minister does not lead to a general election. The UK probably has the largest number of unelected prime ministers of any western country. And it's not voted for like the US president (Electoral College aside). After being voted into the parliament with a majority, an UK party could
elect any prime minister they want.

I've recently talked to someone from Switzerland about all of this, where much more is voted on by the general public, and how this changes peoples mind, about how they feel responsible for politics. People don't see a dividing line between politics and themselves. Wish more countries would be like Switzerland.
I'm trying to contact you about a post you replied to about a start-up ISP from a few months back. You can contact me at morphle73 at gmail dot com.
> You can “own” a vehicle all you want, that doesn’t give you the right to fuck with its odometer or catalytic converter.

Sure it does.

This entire attitude is what's scary about software, actually. See, back in the ye olden days, no one disputed your right to remove the catalytic converter on a vehicle you purchased.

It was no longer legal to drive and if you were caught you could get fined. But you absolutely had the right to do it.

But now with software, there's enough control that 3rd party entities are dictating with 100% success what an owner can do with the vehicle. And you're defending it as right.
Your link was the one I was looking for anyways.
Is there any evidence to support the case that sending more weapons to Ukraine will spare lives?

If so. Shouldn't we prioritize sending weapons to the people of Gaza first, since their casualty numbers are much higher?
A lot of mentions of Airdrop, here. Didn't some versions of it expose unique identifiers, that became a problem in e.g. Hong Kong?

I'm not on Apple, so I didn't sufficiently retain the details, but I remember reading about this a year or two ago.
It wasn't just for the soldiers, it was for the masses too.

The Americans are here, they're not just liberating, they come equipped.

And people get to drink Coke now.
I mean, there is a difference between an informed estimate and knowing for sure. Maybe that person you always work with is not the brightest programmer, but maybe they don't care about it as much as you. People can demonstrate intelligence is many different ways.

Plus, if they doesn't want to know, why does it matter? It's their life to live in ignorance. For this specific topic, I don't see any harm in leaving your actual IQ number a mystery for the cosmos.
Location can be relevant. There is both a quarter mile drag strip by me and a circuit lap by me that both allow you to drive your own car on them.

Both styles of driving would be... Alarming from a telemetry perspective.

Afaik neither is covered by regular auto insurance anyways so it really shouldn't factor into rates. There's specific racing insurance, but it's quite pricey.

Not that I want them sharing location data, but pure acceleration/velocity data won't show areas like that.

I'm also not sure how well regionalized the data is. Though neither is good, there's a very big difference between going 15 over on the highway and going 15 over on back country roads with blind turns. Or between going 15 over on the highway vs in a shopping center parking lot.

Speeding is contextual.
> The uk govt would have to re-implement them one by one,

You have it backwards. They have to de-implement them in order to get rid of them. The EU doesn't have federal laws in the way that the US does, each law is independently implemented in each member state.
It's not that complex. We found a cheap source of carbon based energy. Growth based economics pushed us to use and exploit the source. This created a lot of pollution. And now the planet is getting a lot warmer.

I think people say 'it's complex' to avoid talking about the obvious solution.
You can do whatever you want to it, you just can't legally drive it on public roads anymore. You are forgetting about all the use cases which aren't general public transit.
I encourage you to take a crash course in Mooré, go to Burkina Faso and spread the word to the people. "You will not improve your cirumstances, any more prosperity will destroy the planet." I'm sure they will appreciate your wisdom, almost as much as Cubans appreciate their very eco-friendly economic circumstances. Good Luck.
The science of Oppenheimer: meet the Oscar-winning movie's specialist advisers
Are you trying to tell me you actually don't review your staged changes and/or commits before you push them?

Also how do you resolve conflicts?

Or is this just your solo project with zero users so you dont have to worry about other people's commits or your own commit's quality?
It's the opposite: Upon leaving the EU, the UK basically declared their standards to be exactly those of the EU (at the time that they left), unless the government decides otherwise (there's a bit of a fight about exactly how that happens, as I think at the moment the cabinet has the power to throw out whatever EU legislation they like, as opposed to parliament voting on each repeal, but I might be wrong about whether that actually passed).

This is better than the alternative, which would basically not having any national standards until they developed their own, but you are right that it basically means brexit has mostly increased the amount of paperwork and friction in trading but not actually produced material benefits for most industries in the UK. And in general it makes sense to follow the EU for most standards anyway: if you diverge too much you risk people just not bothering to sell in your country anyway. There's already stupid headaches like this: for EMC certification, if you need a lab to do some tests to sell in the UK and the EU, you currently need to get a lab in the UK and a lab in the EU to perform the exact same tests to the exact same standards. This means a lot of EU companies are just not bothering to certify their products for the UK market (customers will often just import them illegally).
Go on dates with A.I. girls to practice dating, get tailored feedback to improve
I think it’s more like ‘we don’t have a European MS365 or AWS, so our companies and governments are over-indexed on American software, therefore we have to go along with the Americans or we cripple our digital infrastructure’
ownership has a legal definition, the concept of ownership exists outside of the law.
If you die, your 100+ accounts are a nightmare for your family
My biggest concern is that rather than comparing difficult to identify behavior against claim rates, they will penalize behavior that is easy to identify. For example, yesterday I was traveling 15 MPH over the speed limit on a multi-line highway where traffic is often traveling 10+ MPH over the limit (the limit is objectively wrong for a divided, grade separated, access controlled highway). I typically drive as far right as I can to make room for faster vehicles, but eventually got stuck behind someone camping in the left lane. When opportunity presented itself I went around them in the center lane. They expressed anger at this by encroaching into my lane to squeeze me against traffic in the right lane. There were four inches between their vehicle and my side mirror. Who is driving dangerously, and more likely to cause an accident? I would argue it's the driver who is obstructing traffic and behaving aggressively toward others on the road. But if GPS isn't accurate enough to show their lane deviation, it's a lot easier to ding me for my speed.
How to Bring Wi-Fi to the Moon
False GPS signal surge makes life hard for pilots
Here you are: https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/politik/deutschland/it-open-s...
Fake Caviar Invented in the 1930s Could Be the Solution to Plastic Pollution
Yes, but we are doing the bad kind of alteration. The good kind of alteration is completely untested. /s
What purpose would having government employees futzing around with LaTeX serve?

The crazy dogma around these issues hurt everyone.

The smart move is the pragmatic one - just like I can access any of the billions of US Federal Court filings in the intended presentation, mandate production of documents in a standards based PDF or PDF/A format. Then history gets accessible documents for eternity, and entities can choose to use what application makes sense for them.

Or we can bikeshed over the format dick-measuring contest.
It's not about pretty so much as simple things like whitespace or other details. I would never release a UI that acted weird in any way. For instance, DB Browser doesn't scale when undocking. I have to close the app and open it up and then load the database again.

Another example is Total Commander. I would buy it if it worked they way I think and had proper whitespace instead of being infinitely configurable and using non-conventional UX defaults (hit R I should jump to the first file staring with R, FFS).

If I have to suffer through this shit then so be it. If I don't have to suffer through it...delete.
a lot of hatred for assumed and imagined hypocrites here.

In general I feel a lot of the discourse around what people who supported brexit believe or are like (or indeed, what all british people are like) is entirely divorced from my experience living in the country. I don't know what to do but be saddened by people delighting in widening rifts between people
Maybe I was thinking of Thomas Midgley Jr.
Freon and leaded gasoline
That's right ! Telraam's code seems to be closed source, though.

And as far as I know, it has to be installed inside, and can't be used handheld on a cheap smartphone.
Define great

e.g. writing code without consulting any docs or writing code that meets business requirements?
I think Assange would disagree with this statement.
LLMs silently accumulate errors with the length of the sequence predicted ("label bias" is the term that should be in that book, but not in the context of LLMs).

The problem is exacerbated by a very big token dictionary. Every new token you generate is independently sampled (from tokens outside of the context size). If you have any task that requires joint distribution modeling LLM will fail and HMMs/CRFs will succeed. Of course, it depends when the problem will manifest and I do not know that, but skipping the whole book is not recommended.

For example, there were approaches for many language tasks in that book that used CNNs (instead of something more principled) and were extremely successful (despite the lack of joint modeling). Who knows when this accumulation of errors becomes measurable.

As long as your generation of tokens fits inside the context size, you're modeling everything jointly. But I guess you need to be aware that when you drop the furthest tokens to generate next ones, the performance can drastically drop (multiplicative accumulation of errors).
Q: Is it true that there is freedom of speech in the USSR, just like in the USA?

A: Yes. In the USA, you can stand in front of the White House in Washington, DC, and yell, "Down with Ronald Reagan," and you will not be punished. Equally, you can also stand in Red Square in Moscow and yell, "Down with Ronald Reagan," and
you will not be punished.
If they are behind such conspiracy, CIA can not be trusted and should be dissolved!!!
Tons of people scared of mental and other forms of decline here. Hey, I got news! It's 2024. We understand a fair deal more of how our biochemistry works. We have more computing power than ever, and it's going to be increasing thanks to the crazy amounts of computing power our latest AIs need. That means that we can understand even more of how our biochemistry works by doing exactly what each drug company is doing: running computer simulations. If your eventual decline scares you, it's unlikely that you can change your outcomes. But not impossible. It's still perfectly rational to find your peace in resignation, but it's not the only option anymore.
I’ve had limited success with the null object pattern but there is one case that it worked really well for me. I worked on a feature that was highly dynamic and users could compose reports selecting data points from tangentially related models. Null objects were a really helpful pattern because it was hard to anticipate how models would be composed and if a developer made a mistake it was hard to notice there was no effect. Our null objects would raise exceptions in development and explain what you need to change but wouldn’t prevent execution in production.

You could easily argue we should have just presented this exception to the user in all cases but this is where we landed. It’s probably the only case this pattern was beneficial for me.
Do you believe that the economic progress of the last century wasn't worth a 1-2 degrees in temperature rise? Most people, especially those in countries that developed enormously, would not agree. The positive impacts of economic progress so far vastly outweigh the negative impacts of global warming.
Request Your LexisNexis Disclosure Report
All it means is average transistor density went up. It's supposed to mean by 2x but, in practice, it doesn't even mean that really. i.e. "At the 2020 IEEE IEDM conference, TSMC reported their 5nm process had 1.84x higher density than their 7nm process." [2]

And there are a lot stuff in there besides transistors: contacts, metal traces, power routing, ...

And there's also the quality of the software that draws the transistors. (No one draws billions of transistors by hand) And to further complicate things, there are many good reasons to make your transistors larger than the minimize size, and in fact many are.

So, it vaguely means density went up and unfortunately there isn't a single resource that says how to measure it or what the limit is.

Come to think of it, It's kind of like Moore's Law (the topic of TFA) in that it used to have a definite meaning. But then the meaning sort of evolved over time into something else without society actually agreeing on what that "else" was.

[2] https://fuse.wikichip.org/news/3398/tsmc-details-5-nm/