skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hi! I'm the fabled "project manager" that we'd like to hire! Helping run Bevy has been an incredible experience, and I'm very excited about the idea of being able to do this full-time. There are a ton of efforts I'd like to lead, and even more that I'd like to be able to help nudge along.
It's possible that GP confused Gemma and Gemini.
Linkedin OpenHouse: Control Plane for Tables in Data Lakehouses
A Dutch Quandary Offers a Glimpse of a Deepening Problem for Europe
MTE is an optional feature for ARMv8.5 and is only available via ARMv9 in practice. Snapdragon doesn't provide it but they told us they're likely going to add it by 2025/2026.

Pixel 8 and Pixel 8 Pro are the main option with it. MediaTek and Exynos have theoretically added support for it but that doesn't mean any device with their latest flagship SoC theoretically supporting it actually has it available and working.
> You shouldn't have to do this to have cross-browser high quality audio!

You don't, because HE-AACv2 is as universal as MP3 and better than Opus at low bitrates.

That said, Safari for macOS and iOS plays all the examples at https://opus-codec.org/examples/ except the last.
Show HN: Semiform – A new kind of web form, powered by LLMs
except nothing enforces your types at run time, you can have typi hints all you want and everyone else cn ignore them
> To break the JVM protection boundary and access the filesystem only requires finding a JVM runtime breach or a vulnerable library to access the otherwise inaccessible filesystem class.

CPUs also have bugs in them, and those are much harder to patch. Practically speaking, I think it is more likely for a CPU bug to be found than for a Java program to do what you describe here. The prospect of a vulnerable library seems the most likely avenue of attack, but under my proposed system, not even libraries would have access the the file-system.

> Machine code running in unprivileged mode with no shared memory and where syscalls auto-fail can do nothing malicious

I'm fairly sure it can do nothing, so while that technically satisfies the objective, I don't think it really matches the spirit of the assignment. Then if you want to re-introduce the file-system to such a process, your options are much more complex than they would be in the Java case. You can write some Java code that doesn't interact with the file system at all, then pass objects representing files (i.e. streams) into it. The result is absolute fine-grained control over what the process can access because it is not relying on any kind of shared state. All the information it uses is passed into it. This is much easier than attempting to containerise an existing executable, which requires support from the operating system (and also technically support from the hardware).

My core point here is that the software solution to security simply works better than a hardware one. It seems to me that pure functions provide the ultimate form of containerisation, and do so in an immediately intuitive way.
How do people strain their stock? I use a seive with a muslin in which I then squeeze to get all the juices, but its unweildy and messy.
Humira's biosimilars are roughly 20% of the cost of name-brand Humira ($600/mo). It can even be down to 10% of the original cost, or lower, in some shops. You can buy a month's supply for ~75 from an Indian pharam supplier online, for example. The slight kicker is that the biosimilars are not 100% the same (fat) molecule as the original adalimumab.

Insurance companies are starting to say they wont cover name-brand Humira without a strong doctor's note.

Still, the price of the drug went down from being completely unaffordable without insurance to the price of an car payment. It's still expensive, but much better than before. You're not as tied to your company providing good insurance, for example.
My guess is: familiarity. The first person is part of the algorithm that is applied to all the others, making them more familiar. Familiarity trumps.
This is because browsers on iOS do not 'use Safari' but use WebKit and there is huge amount of browser app software built on top of it, which will contribute to variance on benchmarks (and also to these being very different browsers ultimately).
I've ordered over 50 items from Temu and have generally been happy with the quality. There have been one or two complete duds, but I just write that off as you get what you pay for. Not worth sending anything back. The only things I still order from Amazon are consumables - coffee pods, vitamin gummies and cough syrup.
The eng director at my current company does a good job of mitigating this. He'll often give remarks in our technical docs, but always prefaces it with "this is a bike shedding comment but.." etc etc. Always makes it clear that we're free to ignore his input if he's missing necessary context.

Because ultimately eng management must be able to weigh in at points, so we're never going to get rid of that problem. The question is how to do it without wasting IC time.
Many years ago now I saw a stage play based on this book. I went in with a few reservations but was pleasantly surprised with how good it was.
>i'd love an extension of this for the diffusion transformer

All you need to do is replace the U-net with a transformer encoder (remove the embeddings, and project the image patches into vectors of size n_embd), and the diffusion process can remain the same.
So it seems I completely misused the word artifact above. I'll try again.

So my naturalist view is bottom up rather than top down. It is not that H2O exists and I'm trying to explain if the parts explain the whole. I'm saying the only thing that really exists is the First Cause. Everything else is an artifact (say) originating from different arrangements of this base reality.

I think it misleads us to try start with the concept of H2O and ask, is it made of its parts or is it something more. We should instead start with the base rules and see where they end up. In our universe, we end up with electrons and protons and when they combine in different ways, the behaviors of H and O and H2O emerge. And in general, any universe that starts from the physical laws of our universe but say different initial conditions will likely have H and O and H2O in it (there are caveats but the general idea holds).
In medical school we were taught that basically everyone gets alzheimers, or would get it if aged up to a certain age (200, 300, etc). You could make the same argument for cancer - actually in that vein prostate cancer is a big one people die with but not of. When you study the body enough you realize that every system at every micro/macro level is failing slowly with age, but we can only pick on one of them as the cause of death.

Re: citation needed : failed literature search link needed as pre-requisite
It's already taking a conditional. Take a look at the PEP:

if (op->ob_tid == _Py_ThreadId())
op->ob_ref_local = new_local;
else
atomic_add(&op->ob_ref_shared, 1 << _Py_SHARED_SHIFT);

So you're either getting a correct branch prediction or an atomic operation which will dominate the overhead of the branch anyway. All this is saying is in the else branch where you're doing the atomic add, create a new PythonObj instance that has `ob_tid` equal to `_Py_ThreadId`. This presumes that Py_INCREF changes the return type from void to `PythonObj*` and this propagates out so that futher on-thread references use the newer affinity (branch condition is always taken to the non-atomic add instead of the atomic one). It's easier said than done and there may be technical reasons why that's difficult / not possible, but worth exploring eventually so that access by multiple threads of a single object doesn't degrade to taking atomic reference counts constantly.

https://peps.python.org/pep-0703/
Whenever I make stock I make a lot and then freeze it in ice cube trays. Pop out into a gallon ziplock and keep in the freezer. Same convenience at time of use, for slightly more work to make it, but IMO it’s a superior result (especially when you consider chicken/beef/veal stock vs concentrate) so i’m willing to go through with it.
> Yes.. so hypothetically if not for Safari/Chrome not being updatable for MacOS High Sierra, she would still be using the same laptop.

If she'd preferred not to spend money on the laptop, or is just angry about Apple's planned obsolescence, you can always install another OS on the machine for her. I'm running Win10 on a 2013 Macbook Pro, and it supports Chrome just fine.
SQLite has no real types. Use SQLite if data quality is of no concern. The applicability domain of SQLite is far smaller than people think.

If you want to improve on JSON, you would have to go into an other direction. Maybe something like postgis would be helpful for extremely large canvasses.

JSON Schema is pretty powerful by the way. Checkout the documentation. SQLite is absolutely no match there. What Sqlite could bring is speed, but I dont see how in the contxt of canvas it would be of any help here.
The date I have for that work is 1997. See my old list of Smalltalk computers:

http://www.merlintec.com/swiki/hardware/26.html
GP is joking that this is the best thing since sliced (tranched) bread.
If the job market was better I'd tell you to quit. That sounds awful, and wildly irresponsible behavior from a CTO.
> The world do change, we do not have the crystal ball of course, but something is clear enough, and trying to keep up "the old known way" is trying to remain on the large sinking boat fearing the lifeboat.

So you want people to discard their existing way of life, adopt a new way but also are not sure how the new way looks like and acknowledge that there are big gaps to be filled in the new picture? No wonder people would resist that transformation.
I couldn't implement this defer macro without it.
But the training data isn't important!
And to be fair to IKEA they have a decent amount of higher quality flatpack furniture (as do others in the space) that do survive a move much better than cardboard and particle board pieces do.

Those pieces are more expensive, usually.
Any particular reason these 501(c)(3) non-profit public charity designations are no longer granted as freely as before?
Put another way, we have a tendency to like ppl, but once we calibrate, we start penalizing ppl. But without context, we round up. We seek positive attributes first before resorting to negative, and only in aggregate. It's a local-first favouring tactic. local networks (maybe small-world) are maybe more stabilized by the up-rounding.

Or maybe it's also more about calibration over time.

Most of our social technology is about not being shitty to one another at scale (or maybe "in massive sequence"), so this seems aligned with my understanding of the world. The work of progress is to "not be shitty" at increasing scale (of population, idea complexity, levels of abstraction), and we build institutions that mostly try to do that. Though I think digital has kinda failed on that mission lately, which is another conversation

Seems kinda nice and adaptive and optimistic even. Though yes, downsides in a society that lives at scale, if not mitigated by process or social/digital tech.
How do you get enough carrots if you're just using tips/tails? Or do you supplement that with whole carrots?
WeTransfer is having issues
Top Redditors who want to get in on Reddit's upcoming IPO have until March 18
most software doesnt need multi threading. most times people cry about pythons performance then write trivial shit programs that take milliseconds to run in python as well
No the logistics and economics don’t work to run an Airbnb the same as a hotel. Why would Airbnb add regulations that make their customers less profitable or financially viable?
Yep, I think the compelling reason of humans writing code is key here. SQLite would make it less accessible for people to write external tooling to integrate with an obsidian vault. There are lots of existing and open that support diffing/parsing/syncing/manipulating json, while with sqlite you have to not only know sql but support another application’s database schema, which third party developers are less likely to do
If anyone wondered GIL = Global Interpreter Lock
I believe that's the size of the individual particles, not the expected pixel size. The particles will still need to self-assemble which (I suspect) requires larger numbers of particles.

An analogy might be quantum dots, which are nano-scale structures, but each micro-scale pixel uses many dots.
> Under what circumstances is it even worth it for PDD to spend the resources to enforce and monitor this kind of an agreement?

Do you know that the marginal cost for monitoring an extra ex-employee is that large? If they catch someone like him, it seems like it has to pay for itself.
I love Obsidian. I wish they would consider open sourcing the application. It doesn't even seem in conflict with their monetization plans, because they're already distributing the app for free, and making money with things like "Obsidian publish." They've got enough critical mass and a sufficiently thriving ecosystem of community plugins that they could only stand to benefit from open sourcing the core app.

See Mattermost for an example of a similarly positioned product that is fully open source.
By your standards US social media companies are as guilty as TikTok since they have all employed the same tactics before. God, here in Brazil they did the EXACT same thing. Ask people to spam congress and threat to leave if they don't get what they want.
It really is! I've become a SQLite fanboy. :D Although I can definitely see the value in Postgres as well. But it's usually one of those two.
Kitchen Accomplice is worth looking at.
We didn't propose enabling MTE for apps not opting into it any time soon. We proposed enabling it for the base OS by default. Pixels are already testing with HWASan and MTE so there are few issues found by it in the base OS. Enabling it for the base OS and apps opting into it would be a great start. Requiring working MTE support for ARMv9 in the CDD is entirely doable, and then devs will have devices with it, and it can be made into a default for apps at a new target API level with opt-out instead of opt-in. It can then be made into a mandatory feature at a future target API level. Android makes dramatically more aggressive backwards incompatible changes via target API levels than detecting memory corruption without false positives.

We know they're actively testing HWASan and MTE builds, but not with enough real world usage. If they tested it a lot on actual devices used by Google employees, they'd have fixed this Bluetooth LE audio issue before the release.
As much as I love SQL I would have thought this would have abstracted away the SQL bit of the queue and just given me high level queue methods to do stuff with. I don’t like this much for that reason.
Top AI researchers say OpenAI, Meta and more hinder independent evaluations
and their flatpack's just better. I've bought stuff off Wayfair and the like, but Ikea flatpack is better engineered to make the assembly process nicer.
I just use a fine mesh strainer. If you really want clarified stock, you can simmer it with some egg whites and/or shells, the proteins will agglomerate all the remaining sediment. Strain again and done.
Unrelated but sort of not. If you can don't ever do a job interview after lunch on a Friday.
It will never go well. No one wants to be there and is thinking about the weekend.
How to know if a job makes a difference
That's why it will cost $100,000 per injection and insurance won't cover it because it is an experimental treatment.

For those of you who do not enjoy American style healthcare, I am either happy or sorry for you depending on your individual circumstances.
Imo it would need to show varying levels of information density depending on scale. Otherwise, as another commenter stated it's overwhelming....
>And the whole AI is ruining the universe is malarkey

Quantity is a quality of its own. In moderated forums there has been a distinct rise in moderation load because of AI generated "not quite" crap and bots that still do not contribute to the quality of discussions. This is what the death of the internet is about. It's turned into an ocean of piss and pollution that is and will continue to drive people away.
Ralph Lauren does sell $800 sweaters, but in America most (not all though) of the "nice" brands have significantly diluted their quality, so in addition to the $800 sweaters, Ralph Lauren also sells "$150" sweaters which are "marked down" to $80 and are really not very good quality, you could roll the dice and maybe get something comparable on temu for like $15.

The brands don't really do this dilution in other countries yet, and temu is still a diceroll, but I broadly agree with the GP
Since you seem to be on the Graphene team, may I piggyback on this: I've been wanting to make the switch over from iOS for some time but it bothers me a bit that I have to buy a Google phone. Are there any plans to support non-Google devices? I know this has been discussed and the answer I've seen is that Google devices are the best fit, but at least one more option would be nice.
... yea I thought that was reasonably obvious. I'm posting more about the 'artificial' claim. If we had to pick sides, I'm with you.

The manuals and their tales are not ever-present or absolute, while still true.

Those descriptors do exist. They do useful things. However, there's also no significant consequence to ignoring them.

Abusing them is questionable, of course - but not guaranteed to go poorly
Lots of those employees have begun leaving to the home country for that reason.

Working as an H1B is fine for a couple years, but if you're looking at multi-decade long backlogs for a chance at naturalization, it makes sense just to return after leveling up enough, especially because you can demand EU level salaries in most of Asia after a couple YoE in the US.

Koreans, Japanese, and Taiwanese did this in the 90s and 2000s, Chinese in the 2000s and 2010s, and increasingly Indians post-pandemic.

Most Indian H1Bs and F1 OPTs I know at Twitter and FAANG (from NCG to seniorish Eng and PM) have made amends with eventually returning to India in 5 years or becoming a Canadian citizen and using the TN backdoor, just like how a lot of Chinese talent began seriously considering starting their own startup back in China in the 2010s.

-------------

This is actually one of the major pluses of American soft power - a lot of talent will get mis-bucketed in hierarchical systems in Asia (there are plenty of diamonds in the rough in Tier 2/3/4/5 programs) but they won't get placed at top programs.

As such, those kinds of people end up emigrating abroad and do fairly well in the US, or when they return to the old country.

If you treat foreign workers well, when a portion of them inevitabely return to their home country, they will have decently pro-American views.

Plenty of younger Chinese who returned to the Mainalnd from the US are strongly in favor of normalized relations, and even the elite like Xi Jingping still send their kids abroad (Xi's daughter is still in Cambridge MA for example and all his blood relatives in Australia)
Platform for Architecture-Neutral Dynamic Analysis (PANDA)
Now I'm curious how many tech companies actively used questionable practices to build their foundation, then lobbied to make those practices illegal to mitigate competition. I've a feeling this is so common that they don't even see the irony in it anymore.
Nope I just use whatever is in the bag, I don’t care too much about the ratio. But we try to eat lots of carrot/celery sticks for snacks, and I regularly cook things with mirepoix so there’s not exactly a dearth of them.
Indeed, speed is an issue (and it's hard to tackle). Additionally, when using Chrome, what you see is not always what you get. The layout often doesn't match expectations, especially with complex elements. It's ok for simple use cases, but for professional and scalable solutions, you usually need to switch to something else!!
Archive for research purpose:

https://archive.is/jiAfN
Yes, Tabs are great for filling out the same forms in Triplicate every day, if you're into old timey workflows.
In my experience it is fatigue first and failure of the teacher to keep the time limit second.
Well said. The more I read and attempt to understand LLM and AI the more interesting the parallels to the human mind. Our conscience mind is similar to a model and weights are applied in the training of our model in a variety of ways. Parents, school, environment, illness, books, video games , relationships, religion, etc all work to help fine tune our model and in essence develop our presented conscience self (well maybe … ). Breaking down of the neurons leads to the model itself breaking down and the conscience person we know is lost.

Perhaps there is more than us than just our conscience personality and the essence that vibes with the larger pattern of life and reality itself is more than our little personalized highly tuned version of “me”.

Interesting times to be alive for sure.
Oh, that is indeed less than I thought!
Hmm…

I would think that there are two forces at play here:

1) the ones who come first are not compared against any of the latter ones, so make a better impression

2) the ones who come last are still in memory, especially if results are all tabulated in the end.

So, if the above is true, and there is no guarantee that it is, I would have expected an inverted bell curve.
hmmm, I used to like to go 2nd back then. The first one might have (mostly) "technical difficulties" that get solved afterwards.

The latter you go, the more desperate the group will become. Fatigue and whatnot.
I think a flip side I've seen is when the first applicant through an interview loop has basically no chance of getting an offer because (a) people know they're not calibrated and (b) "surely the odds are low that the very first person would be the right person"

This kinda means it's a waste of the candidate's time unless they're _also_ just interviewing for practice.
> I think you're talking about the trade offs between supporting features like "DOM manipulation, state management, animation, etc." and "shipping updates" out of the box, versus only storing the data as simple files and leaving everything else to the implementation.

I'm not sure I understand. Can you clarify?

> Sqlite is more performant more performant and provides lots of built-in features. However, most note taking users do not have enough notes or files to benefit from that performance.

For a graph with lots (thousands+) of nodes/edges, SQLite is probably capable of being more performant than a JSON file, depending on whatever specific kind of performance we're measuring. That said, to me, the most interesting thing that SQLite gives for applications when compared to flat files is data integrity, via transactions and schemas/constraints. Performance is nice but not even close to the most interesting thing about SQLite in most applications. Performance has never been the reason I've chosen SQLite over flat files for my applications.

> Sqlite will also lock the user into the application, whereas a "pack of files" can be used in the shell as a text editor. Using markdown files + a open json format has the benefit of being supported by multiple applications (e.g. sometimes i open my obsidian vault in vscode), while a sqlite database would need a proprietary schema coupled with a single application

In a sense you're right about this! I'll grant it's easier to open a JSON file in vscode and edit it if you already know vscode and JSON. That said, SQLite is in the public domain with a well-defined, stable format and there are countless free and open source database editors/viewers out there.

SQLite is self-describing, also. You open `sqlite3` and type `.schema` and it shows you the database schema. You enter a query and get some results. It's all right there. So, while a database might have a schema that was designed for a particular application, that doesn't mean you as the end user can't tinker with it, and the number of people who know SQL is rather large.