skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah, I'm guessing that's exactly why that step is like step #3 in the official quickstart tutorial.
Thank you to both commenters, who pointed me to this theory:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quintessence_(physics)
Butterfly can export to pdf/svg and is quite feature rich.

https://github.com/LinwoodDev/Butterfly
Or maybe he is busy maintaining his own projects and does not have time/ don't want to onboard and contribute to SourceHut ...
Being right doesn't matter if you aren't rich enough to fight.
> 4. The gatekeeper shall allow and technically enable the installation and effective use of third-party software applications or software application stores using, or interoperating with, its operating system and allow those software applications or software application stores to be accessed by means other than the relevant core platform services of that gatekeeper.

> 7. The gatekeeper shall allow providers of services and providers of hardware, free of charge, effective interoperability with, and access for the purposes of interoperability to, the same hardware and software features accessed or controlled via the operating system…

More about DMA here: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/apples-dma-malicious-co...
This isn't so correct. Humans in isolation aren't so vastly superior from other animals, if you observed primitive humans and your typical troop of chimps it wouldn't be the slam dunk you're singing about. The truth is we're just enough better to develop and use written communication, and the majority of human progress beyond that has been trial/error and imitation with successes preserved through writing. Transmission of the written word enabled humanity to become a collective intelligence of sorts, individually we aren't that smart.
> where indie apps tend to be higher priced and upfront paid

If this is the case, this is an even worse deal, due to the annual install fee. If it was one time, it wouldn't be so bad.
That's not what that means, that's saying Apple can't give themselves special private APIs to do things other apps can't or charge to access them.

Which is funny because you can drive a shipping container through the loophole which is OS components can have special privileges and the boundary between apps and OS for 1st party software is fuzzy.
From a business point, I can totally understand what Apple is doing. Making this as painful and unpredictable (as a developer you never know if your app will be successfull and gain more than 1 million installs) is the way to keep developers using the old contract and keep them on the app store. This makes sense for Apple to find every loophole possible ...

As a consumer, and an Apple users, I want them to be slapped as hard as possible for how they implement this.
Ironically, weights and biases are likely not copyrightable.[0] I looked into this first when the LLaMA model was released on BitTorrent, and concluded that downloading it was perfectly legal. The courts even have controlling precedents that say "sweat of the brow" is not a valid justification for copyright, meaning that the effort these large organizations put into training their models does not grant them protection.[1]

[0]https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35121093

[1]https://definitions.uslegal.com/s/sweat-of-the-brow-doctrine...
There is no basis to any of your arguments. Embedding spaces are not defined by humans, but learned. A priori you have zero idea in what way or how efficient things will be encoded. It all depends on the model and it's internally learned world representation. And things like "metacognition" are meaningless terms used by quacks. We don't know how the brain works, we only know what it can do on the outside. And it is mathematically proven that neural networks can do literally everything in principle as well, thanks to universal approximation.
Meanwhile, there have been some cultural developments. Many deaf now learn sign as a first language and may not even learn their local, written/spoken language until much later in life, so are uncomfortable with written. Sign is also far faster and more expressive than anything typed: think how the internet invented emojis as a poor substitute. As a result, this class often prefer signing over face-to-face video chat, with an interpreter if necessary.

In the US, it wasn't understood that early language access is essential to infant brain development until the 80s, at which point ASL gradually replaced clumsy attempts to teach English. So there is now a whole culture (capital-D Deaf) that are ASL users all day with English as a second language.

Back to this context, there might always be some TTD and caption phone users, and captions can be auto generated now. We're probably at a point where a true AI video interpreter is possible. Good ASL training data is probably going to be the bottleneck.
I have fears that the work I do today, will cause some sort of negative externality like Apple.

I might be a hardware engineer, make something cool, but you have some psychopath take your work, manipulate people's emotions and make them feel status insecure, then sell to them. Think of how much pain low income people feel watching Apple's commercials knowing they have an old iPhone. Think of the Apple legal team, promoting themselves at consumers and developers expense. Close to a billion people had their neurotransmitters negatively affected because of Steve's hardware success.

It just worries me that my good intentions today, can turn into immoral actions 10-20 years later.
Github has network effects that will always be difficult for challengers to overcome. Even Gitlab is nowhere near taking over. GH is effectively a professional resume for many people, and if they're contributing to something they want that recorded on their profile. When was the last time a recruiter asked to see your Gitlab or Sourcehut profile? As far as they're concerned those contributions might as well not exist, and like it or not that really matters to people. In short, it's the people, not the code that counts.
I personally always turned them on. Unlike with C arrays for example (which lose track of their length) Pascal keeps it around so the cost of a bounds-check is exactly what one would expect.

Perhaps I'm wrong regarding the culture of Pascal users though, only speaking for myself as someone who mostly coded in Delphi for fun.

Most C++ implementations provide an option to turn on bounds checks for operator [] in various container types but this actually against the standard, and std::span doesn't even have .at() standardized yet despite the implementation amounting to an if and a call to operator [].

So safety in C++ is very hit and miss. All the necessary tools are there but the standard is lousy as all heck. Like I argue in my blog, it's an attitude problem.

Don't use raw pointers/pointer arithmetic. Only use bounds checked operations even if you're 100% sure you got the bounds right (if it's that obvious the compiler will remove the check too). Don't store references anywhere, they should be ephemeral. Use std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr as appropriate, they are your friends. Don't use unsafe casts/untagged unions. etc.

It's not hard to have a linter check most of this. It's a matter of doing it.
Why would the financial valuation of a company be an indication? That just means they make a lot of revenue and it's estimated they will in the future.
Her cared too much and clearly it was too much to bear.
I wonder how many friendships from former Boeing colleagues he lost because of this.
I can’t speak for most, but for me it’s simply that GitHub operates more like a social media network for developers than a web-based git. As such I evaluate it by number of users because it equates directly to the number of social interactions I’m likely to have.

Morally I would love to stop using Microsoft products, much in the same way I’d like to stop using Meta products, but the problem is that I’m not there for the product, I’m there for the people. I can find products that better align with my values but I can’t bring along all the connections and possibility of connections
Telegram has probably sufficient money, so that threatening them into doing what FB/Meta wants does not work. They only go after small enough fish, preying on the weaker.
The DMA is perfectly clear regarding its intention and context. Trying to split hairs to find wiggle-room in the text just so a gatekeeper can maintain the status-quo for a while longer is absolutely malicious.

Furthermore, Apple’s behaviour is quite discouraging for us EU based developers who actually understand and aspire to the EU’s values and what we consider “normal” treatment of the people using our apps and services.
Still waiting for Epstein...

Seriously though, I've watched way too many movies where there is a staged suicide to not be biased against a story like this.

There is no way we'll ever know what happened unless there is a trial with a lot of non circumstantial evidence presented.
Because contrary to what tourists think Amsterdam is not a theme park. Normal people live and work there.

When tourists come home drunk at four in the morning they wake up families who have to get up at 7 to go to work and school.
There is a reason why we seperate tourists in hotels.

AIRBNB stopped catering to digital nomads and went straight into the hotel business.
When I said this last year, people said

"BUT THEY ARE DEMOCRAITIZING IT"

Its good to see that I was always right, even last year. I just didn't have a dad who owned an emerald mine.
> Not that I don't believe what you're saying, but how is this a thing they could possibly expect to hold up as a trademark infringement?

The worst part is that it doesn't even matter if they have a case or not. The mere threat of "Look at how much it'll cost you even if you're right" can be enough for people to pull back.

Recent relevant case is the Sony vs Bleem!, where Bleem! "won" but because of costs, Bleem! had to shut down anyway. So even if Sony lost the court case, they won because they shut down the group.
The emotional strain of being a whistleblower and having your colleagues now see you as the enemy

This is a problem. Would you really see a whistleblower as your enemy? Is your identity so intertwined with your job that you take legal action against your employers so personally? Do you think your employer has that much loyalty to you? Boeing just had layoffs in December. I'm sure the issues this guy was uncovering played a part in that. We should all hold our bosses accountable. If they mess up, it's going to be bad for us.
I believe it's fruitless to try to reach that state. Because the harder you try, more difficult it is to reach. I have been in the zone working on a messy desk, with tons of distractions around. And I have failed to be in the zone with all my website-blocking apps and having my phone away.

You get into the zone because you're obsessed with a problem or an idea. It's the key to being in the flow. Too many people try to optimize the environment, when it helps only a little.

Unfortunately, I only have a little clue how to trigger it. But I do know that what you're working on is the most important part. In addition to that journaling, reading, and meditation help. Other than that, it's okay to leave these things to chance and not try too hard.
>You're implying that bees are less intelligent than humans.

>However they can sense electromagnetic fields and can sense whether a flower they're interested have pollen or not without looking at it with their eyes.

Which, yes, like your other examples, is an impressive feat, but not an impressive feat of intelligence. Perceiving one or another part of the spectrum isn't intelligence. Neither is hardwired responses. In contrast:

>Oh, also crows understand and exploit physical phenomena and can manipulate things with tools to get what they want.

That would be a feat of intelligence. But you're lumping all impressive feats into "intelligence", regardless of what's responsible for them.
I was going to suggest Rive too. I came across them when I was trying to figure out how Duolingo's animations were done, pretty cool tool.

For Trangram - it might help to link each of the examples in the "Explore & Get Inspired" section to the editor, allowing new users to avoid the "blank page" syndrome.
Yes. The App "App Store" has special APIs that allow other apps to be installed on the phone that do not experience this charge.
>assuming that AGI can be achieved by just scaling up current LLM models on text, video, audio, etc.

Is any sane person actually trying this?

I can't imagine an LLM ever going AGI.
This is national policy-making, so why would a country care about the effect outside of its borders?

I understand that US national policy is not done in a vacuum, but it seems reasonable for a nation to start with its best interests in mind.

What do you think?
Funny how things go. As a consumer especially, but even as a developer I don’t want the DMA to succeed and purposefully want iOS to be a walled garden. It’s literally one of the reasons why I’m on iOS!
I reckon an uptake of 0.5% of EU users will do this - people will distrust if it does not come from the Apple store.
> A day ago you were arguing talent can’t come without training

> In fact much of your comment history is dedicated to claiming knowledge requires product.

Your comment is a great example of someone putting their (mis-)interpretation into something.

No, I didn't say anything about products. I leave that for tinkerers and sales people.

> Do you have a real counter example?

Already gave you one, no idea why you're asking again.
I worry about my family both young and old who all had adware and malware ridden Android phones before I got them iPhones.

The vast majority of people use smartphones against their will and have no desire to learn anything about the magical Facebook machine in their hands.

They press buttons and things happen, who cares what the dialog box says, they press the button that will get them doing what they want to do the fastest, who cares if it said whatever they were doing is dangerous. This is how most people view their phones, and why there are Android botnets and not iOS botnets.
Those were most likely done with malicious intend. So did the perpetrators face any other consequence apart from having their repository closed?

Does DMCA help to make this happen less often?
Show HN: Kindest – Personal Relationship Manager for iPhone
A Swedish Heat Pump Startup Plans to Wean Europe Off Gas
What can AI learn from the age of vacuum tubes?
> and have an app that had more than one million first annual installs on iOS in the EU in the prior calendar year.

In other words the option is still a joke not worth using. "Yes, you can distribute independently... as long as you've already been popular on the iOS App Store in the past year".
> We need formally-verified operating systems

Compartmentalization is a far stronger security measure according to experience. See: Qubes OS.
I don’t believe any of these far fetched stories on reddit. Good entertainment though.
Well, I flew once on a 787 Dreamliner and we had to wait around 2 hours, because restarting a system, waiting for experts to arrive, took that much time. At least that was what the pilot told us.
It's one of those reddit stories that i just refuse to believe.

No way a human being can be petty to this level
In my experience github has no value in your cv/resume at all
HP EliteBook 850 G8 Notebook PC, i7-1185G7 @ 3.00GHz, Windows, plugged in:

Firefox 123.0: 12.1 ± 0.62

Edge 122: 14.8 ± 0.68

Google Pixel 7a, GrapheneOS, on battery:

Fennec 123 with Dark Reader: 2.91 ± 0.066

Fennec 123 without Dark Reader: 5.28 ± 0.089

Vanadium 122: 6.96 ± 0.39
An easier way to debug Github Actions is to use tmate [0]. In short, you can set up an action that allows you to tmate into the worker on failure and then figure out what's wrong. In addition to the default setup, it's recommended to limit access with an SSH key [1].

[0] https://github.com/mxschmitt/action-tmate

[1] https://github.com/mxschmitt/action-tmate?tab=readme-ov-file...
All the time. I think it's a great way to "learn" the environment you're coding in sometimes.

When I was first learning PHP I spent a year or two without a debugger. The first time I tried one I learned about a whole bunch of global variables I had no idea about.

I recently set up nvim-dap and have wonderful debugging experience while still in the "purity of not using IDEs or debuggers" realm.
What a psychopath. Also, why isn't anyone suggesting suing the employer? Your contract is with the employer, not the mentally ill IT guy. And obviously anyone who works for the employer shouldn't be trusted here (luckily the new IT guy spilled the beans).
Glad you liked it! Just curious, what else would you like to see to make the post more complete? I had focused on getting through the basics of diffusion training and sampling as concisely as possible, but perhaps in future posts I can delve deeper into other aspects of diffusion.
Because something is opensource and "easy to fix" are we expected to not talk about it?
Ask HN: What is not going to change in future?
There are always few things in every field which never changed.
What are the top things according to you which not going to change or didn't change in the field of software development?
You mean that if you sent links to your Gitlab or Sourcehut profiles (or even your personal site) when asked for your Github profile, those recruiters would refuse to look at it?
Is there any reason to use mailing lists for a new project? I totally get why you'd want to keep the mailing list structure for existing ones especially if your contributors are used to it, but it's such an off putting experience that I don't get why a newer project would want to use it. I read the article about why mailing lists are still good from sourcehut, but I think it just isn't convincing. So I'm genuinely wondering what I'm missing? I'm glad sourcehut is taking a different approach to other git services but I can't help but think that there's got to be a better way even if you don't want "GitHub style" pull requests.
git was wildly successful, yes, but it still has hints of what esr was talking about. once you step out of the clone/checkout/commit/push loop, git is extremely thorny for people who aren't "with it."
Are you aware that nothing is stopping you from only visiting websites made by individuals, and medium-sized businesses? In fact, you can also choose to use cool things like Google Earth, AND choose not to use shit things like Twitter, Facebook, Google Search etc.
I believe, that the "lies to children"-approach is one of the driving forces behind the general science-skepticism, and maybe even behind some consipiracy theories and some climate-science-denial.

It basically goes like this:

1. Teachers are authorities and present facts to children

2. people later learn that some of these facts are in-fact not factual

3. people learn that:

a) authorities can not be trusted

b) it is ok to make up facts, as long as they sound good

4. people apply a) and b) to other situations
Suppose it doesn’t work, it’s not productive, and it’s worse than not doing it.

You still have a boss asking these questions. Any answer you provide constitutes a framework.
This isn't trolling, this is highly targeted harassment. If you want to do others a favor, make sure to hire a lawyer and go after him. This is nobody that should ever work with IT systems because that requires a high amount of integrity.

Usually it isn't trivial to log and audit such access to work resources. But if there is any evidence, it might help.
That's the nice thing about the DMA ... Nobody forces you to install a 3rd party app store, nobody forces you to install apps from websites, nobody forces you out of the walled garden. For you nothing changes. Those that want to use their 1000€ device differently than you now have the chance to.
It's a common request and can email the moderators (dang) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23197966 There might be a reason why it hasn't happened yet or it's simply not pressing compared to keeping the website running.

I use the 'Dark Reader' Firefox extension as work-around.
In a tourist spot, long term renters are going to be paying less per month than short term tourist.

I don’t know anyone who would want a bunch of Airbnbs intermixed with their residential areas
The situation in the US seems to suggest that trying to finely analyze the exact sequence of words in a law or the consitution still leaves a whole lot of room for arbitrary decisions. Abortion was a constitutional right until it wasn't and the constitution was not changed between.
It only stops honest people from making “mistakes”. Anyone with the desire to abuse these frankly stupid copyright laws can and will do so
They have made it so complicated, you need to already have 2 years app available and over a million downloads.
I have to agree a stubborn portion of companies refuse to look at it. It's their loss. If a company does not respect open source contributions I think it's a good filter.
> Alternative app marketplaces. Marketplaces can choose to offer a catalog of apps solely from the developer of the marketplace.

How does that count as a "marketplace"?

> Web Distribution ... will let authorized developers distribute their iOS apps to EU users directly from a website owned by the developer

All of this just makes it crystal clear what Apple's goal is: to prevent competition. It's not about security like they've been lying about; it's all about maintaining their app store monopoly.
Trump asked Elon Musk if he wanted to buy Truth Social
Fair point. Let's cut through the fluff: thinking LLMs won't lead to AI singularity because they occasionally spit out nonsense is like dismissing the potential of the internet because you once got a 404 error. These blunders aren't the endgame; they're stepping stones. Technology evolves. What's a joke today could be the entity outsmarting us tomorrow. Don't worry about sci-fi scenarios of digital torture chambers just yet, but maybe don't write off the potential of AI based on its current puberty phase either. Underestimating tech progress is a bit like laughing at early cars for being slower than horses—amusing, until you're the only one left in the dust.
Having tracked API changes fairly closely on macOS and iOS for many years now, I can’t think of too many that were just pointless furniture shuffling. Nearly all of them were to enable addition of new features or to improve developer QoL in some way — dropping 32-bit support for example allowed them to make long desired improvements in AppKit that were impractical prior due to quirks in the way Objective-C works.

That said I also don’t think it’s a reasonable expectation for old binaries to continue to work indefinitely. Maintenance is a reality of life of a software developer, and personally speaking if I found myself unable or unwilling to do quick spot checks on each platform my apps run at least once a year, I’d just drop support for those platforms or discontinue the app.

That’s not to say that Apple is blameless here, but I think Microsoft has set an unrealistic standard (while also making some things much more difficult for themselves… Windows on ARM for example will never materialize so long as developers expect to be able to toss a binary over the wall and abandon it for a decade, because no matter how good an x86 compat layer is, it’s still significantly worse than native).
For years Apple has placed deliberately crafted limitations on 3rd party apps that put theirs at an advantage. They've done anything but treat developers fairly. If they did, maybe this legislation was unneeded, but with the way they've been acting, it feels like a long time coming.

Edit: self plug: https://boehs.org/node/private-apis