skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> The best part of the "UFO" debate, for me, is the flames and the fervor of all these folks who really, really need to convince others that they're right. On both sides. And What if they are? It still ain't gonna patch the roof or plow the back 40.

> (I'm in the "crazy views" section of the audience, i guess)

At least you're not alone there. I'm right there with ya, brother (or sister, or little green alien, hell I dunno; It's the Internet; You're an "Internet person" somewhere "out there" in "the cloud"). ;)
That only works if the Chinese restaurant is supplying the Chinese fleet with a lot of their food.
How dare them wanting to make money. Seriously this is fine, if you are not happy fork it and maintain it yourself. AFAIK this is the whole point of open core.

What you are asking here is that business to support code for free that reduces their revenue. Code is a liability most of the time not an asset.
Just another employee of Google who is heading up a surveillance technology project for a government that many view as regressive and oppressive, to put it mildly.
Chemical injection brings dying batteries back to life
Just imagine if Richard Feynman weren't scientist but a banker.
This reminds me of a situation at Twitter where someone was communicating fearlessly to build trust, but learned as the CEO put it there were still consequences.

US companies are going to be weird about this for the next few years. They want to do the profitable thing, but have spent the last decade making workers feel like they have a say. In the end, management and shareholders are in charge, the rest is an illusion.
> I never claimed it was necessarily false.

Doesn't real line up with this, which is essentially claiming its false:

> ... shows like that have a long history of doing selective editing or purposely taking things out of context.
The article starts out by making a comparison between the posix api filesystem calls and S3's api. The context is very much a comparison between those two api surface areas.
SSH-via-Cloudflare-tunnel: Alternative way to expose machines behind NAT
Refuted papers continue to be cited more than their failed replications
They want to avoid critical outside dependencies. For example relying on the electrical grid is avoided because that would be overly dependent on a single outside supplier.

But using electrical devices powered by batteries or generators or solar panels is fine in many of those communities because there are multiple suppliers of all of those (and in the case of generators for the fuel to power them).
should have perl in your tables since that's the original regex master programming language.
This kind of behavior doesn't scale. Eventually you have people that just give in to the hysterics because they just want to do their job and not fight ideological battles and the ideologues take over the company. See: how dei took over google and we got gemini.
I mean... why can't I. The printer is obviously capable of printing such patterns.
Intel’s deployment of the first NA EUV system from ASML in North America, a clear outcome of Biden’s CHIPS Act, sharply contrasts with the tech and trade strategies under the Trump administration. While Trump focused on aggressive trade policies and tariffs, particularly aimed at China, his approach was more about defense than fostering domestic innovation and manufacturing in the semiconductor industry. Trump’s era saw heightened trade tensions that, while addressing the issue of dependence on foreign tech, didn’t provide the substantial investment and support for semiconductor manufacturing that the CHIPS Act under Biden does. Biden’s strategy, in contrast, is pumping billions into the sector, not just protecting it but actively expanding America’s capacity to innovate and manufacture critical technology at home. This move under Biden’s watch is not merely a defensive posture but a proactive boost, setting the stage for long-term technological leadership and economic strength.
This project is MIT licensed. It is not source available, but is open source (if your definition of open source means OSI-conformant license).

The author/community is welcome to exercise those options that MIT affords them, such as forking and launching a competing product.
My 18 month old son got burned. I don't know who will not go to ER in this case no matter the burn intensity.
https://archive.ph/rZvpO
GCP storage buckets implement the S3 api. You can treat them like they were an s3 bucket. Something I do all the time.
It’s pretty crazy that you’d have people protest fellow employees because they are from a country you disagree with. Presumably this protestor while employed by Google would protest its founder and major shareholder as well just because his patents were Russian.

It used to be you’d keep politics and religion at home and would not bring them into the workplace. On the other hand these companies encouraged activism over the years and they shouldn’t be surprised when it goes off the rails.
Thanks for posting this, that was my first thought as well. My understanding is that so long as you aren't conveying it to others it is perfectly fine to have it on your own property in Alaska according to state law.
> Everyone has cell phone cameras, so it seems unlikely we'd have 0 footage of anything.

I appreciate this argument, but the tech is not so good you can effectively take highly zoomed in shots of fast moving objects and have it be really visible. Try it some time. My Pixel 8 is impressive, but I still do not feel it produces better video than my (middle-aged) eyes can see at objects in the sky.
Sure. Dominance reached, no need to pretend to be fair and thoughtful company. Same as with Elon.
That's my understanding, yes. For instance, for fabric, they avoid retail, going to manufacturers (or at least wholesalers) and buying a community-year's worth in a single transaction.

I guess it's channeling https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+17%3A15-16... ; transactions between english and amish are necessary (from being in the world) but to be minimised (not being of the world), whereas transactions between english or between amish don't count for flow across that boundary.

(too much rumination concerning flows across boundaries leads us across a different boundary: out of theology and into physical mathematics, eg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stokes%27_theorem#Maxwell's_eq... )

====

Edit: unfortunately https://www.jstor.org/stable/44257359 (amish & tourism, 1997) is paywalled

see also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonconformity_to_the_world#Bib...

For historical developments, see https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Nonconformity#Europe.2C_As...

For intersection with hippiedom, consider https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6itauSnrSZA
Yeah, those fire, pots and crops where so useless compared to those. And the wheel? Na, it's not that important.
By happenstance I just ran across this by the same author somewhere: https://ymeskhout.substack.com/p/death-of-a-client
Either you care enough to read my comment and link to comment back or you don’t. That’s called decency. Not my laziness to be quite honest with you. There’s now two comments and yet you still haven’t cared to respond about the original comment. Anyway here’s the last comment I’ll make.

This bill was written for ALS folks. It allows them to get access to safe drugs while clinical trials continue on efficacy. These provisioned drugs/illnesses like ALS, Cancer, etc provide dying people a chance to try things they would not be able to get, even through expanded access programs.

This has little to do with quacks entering the market or cynical capitalism. The drugs must demonstrate safety already and have some scientific evidence that they are on a “promising path” to efficacy while going through later phased trials.

We live in a day and age where much of our medicine is quite safe and goes through rigorous testing. But clinicians cannot get access to these drugs until they have been EUA or approved. This process takes many years to do and people suffering from these diseases have a right to try “unproven”, promising things.
They need to be able to differentiate core from Enterprise. If they can't make money in a sustainable way the open core company will die and so will the open source project. Those who fail to see this reality are only hurting themselves.

This is perfectly fine.
> My entire point is that this style of show sometimes gets it wrong.

Fair enough. How about this instance of it though, did they get it right or wrong?
I can agree with this claim, however i think it's subjective to individuals
You can set up cloud watch events to trigger a lambda function to store meta data about the s3 file in a regular database. That way you can index it how you expect to list.

Very effective for our use case.
> Try to decode mpeg video at HD resolution in software sometime.

Firefox has only started to ship hardware accelerated video decode a few versions ago. Until very recently, all my video playback was software decoded.
Amish approaches to technology are way more nuanced and sophisticated than most people think. You might find this article [1], called "Amish Hackers", interesting.

[1] https://kk.org/thetechnium/amish-hackers-a/
Free money via UBI won’t cause inflation because we’ll just create more taxes!

Increased government spending via MMT won’t increase inflation because we’ll just create more taxes!

Both ideas rooted in the same academic nonsense that is divorced from reality.
This behaviour is itself inherently good for authoritarian regimes though. You can’t escape politics
Yeah I understand the disappointment, but „open core“ implies that there are parts that are not part of the core, and therefore not open. Those parts will usually be something that enterprises value.

At the end of the day, maintainers for complex projects need to get paid.
The reason they're not worried is because in the worst case, they will get millions of dollars of severance payment, instead of jail time. I'm sure there are sound legal and even economic reasons behind this, but it's still unacceptable and infuriating.
Surveillance is one thing. A real problem these days.

However, directly assisting live-streamed mass murder with AI systems is quite another.
I think those were the last remnants of the cold war. Now every "commie" tool will have to be used to have a say and hope the privacy is still enough not to be infiltrated by agents provocateurs.
> That doesn’t mean they’re likely.

Oh, but they are indeed "likely" (statistically speaking, considering the vastness of the Universe, and this planet being proof positive of life existing in that vastness), but aliens visiting here seems much less likely to me (again, given the vastness of the Universe).

> “Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.”
― Douglas Adams
> In the end, management and shareholders are in charge, the rest is an illusion.

then let’s skip a few pages and wrap this one up so we can move on to the next book. or maybe write a new one.
> We find inspiration not from the size of a market, but from the importance of the work. Because the importance of the work is the early indicator of a future market.

> You are probably one ArXiv paper away from figuring this thing out.

> I used to be a dishwasher. I’ve cleaned a lot of toilets. I’ve cleaned more toilets than all of you combined. And some of them you can’t unsee. That’s life.

Great story and speech. Many lessons.
Yeah, you should definitely also stop talking about your kids at work. Nobody cares about your straight lifestyle.
I don’t think that’s a defensible standpoint.

Folders are an important part of the way most people use filesystems.
Please expand of this.

Are low income people not typically eligible for all of the services I mentioned?

We live in a society that is incredibly generous to the poor.
We were talking specifically about aliens visiting California. Not the existence of life elsewhere in the universe.
The UI will fake them without even creating the 0-byte object.
I think the problem is the terminology. People grew up when open source software was also free. Open core uses the same terminology, although products are only open and free in a limited way. I don’t want to assume intend, but many users are mislead that way.
It would be cool to have a tool similar to this, but for composing a graph of commands similar to aws step functions (or Jenkins pipelines). I’d call it mapexec :)
Associated with implies no causality, but of course everybody knows that, right?
Emacs, org-mode, and restclient-mode will be there :)
Just to be clear, 96% decreased odds of cognitive decline = good? Rather confusing way to put it
And even for a "true" open source project and even if the feature matches the aims of the project maintainers may still not accept it, as they don't want to commit to the maintenance work.

They can't rely on the contributor to be quick to respond to issues and flaws fall back on them.
Ask HN: Are killer robots the only way to have UBI and a volunteer military?
If you don't want UBI and mandatory military service, then maybe killer autonomous robots are necessary?
Biscotti, a new crate for HTTP cookies
> The reason for cannabis use, but not frequency and method, is associated with SCD. Further research is needed to investigate the mechanisms that may contribute to the observed associations between non-medical cannabis use and decreased odds of SCD.
Situations like this one bring out the difference between people who want open source to be supported and those who just want a freebee.
They’re saying that a “commodity NIC” doubles in bandwidth every 2 years, and extrapolating forward given that 1Gb was (supposedly) standard in 2003; the website in the post transcribed this incorrectly and put 1Gb in the description of the datapoint, but we can see from first principles that the figure is clearly that of a 200Gb link.
Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) is the self-reported experience of worsening or more frequent confusion or memory loss.

Lower odds is seemingly a good thing (if you’re somebody that enjoys retaining memory)
Also the pixel art Apricot logo. Very nice.

It almost feels like this is not an actual company or product, but a convincing retro design created by a designer today. I know Apricot was real, but something about it feels like it’s winking ironically, in a “what if this had taken off” kind of way. Imagine the pixel art Apricot on the back of a 2006 smartphone in that alternate universe. (Steve Jobs never went back to Apple and instead Apricot teamed up with ARM and Psion to create the Jesus Phone, turning Britain into the new Silicon Valley…)
Keep politics out of the workplace and you won’t have a problem.
lol what? Standing up and yelling during a meeting is probably the tip of the iceberg. They’re also trying to stage protests, etc.

Nah this person wasn’t working productively any more, as far as I can tell. Worse, they were reducing productivity of others. Possibly making an unsafe work environment.

It’s not about being sensitive or even agreeing. It’s about making product. If we were chopping wood and someone stopped chopping to complain about inner city transit systems. You’d fire them.
I would've agreed with you five or so years ago but https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/305868 is more than an accident, you begin to wonder what's going on. There are staff shortages everywhere, why not with pilots? Are they as rested and trained as they ought to be? Together with the plane safety issues surfacing like an army of skeletons falling out of an infinite closet, I am not so sure we are on the same track as we were before.
Willfully disrupting meetings? Lol. That's not "one small thing", that's "this guy has no place inside a mcdonalds as a CUSTOMER, let alone inside a company"
I wrote white lies, then I wrote about exaggerating, and I said I cannot blame anyone for lying. You're on about lying. There is a difference. White lies are commonly made every day, while flat out lying is more rare. I'm not a proponent of big lies because they're easily found out, and possibly against the law. But little white lies? People get away with that all the time.

If you want to go against the flow and change the world, sure, be honest all the time. Unfortunately, my experience is that on short-term (with regards to the issue at hand) you're better off with white lies. Yes, because 'everyone does it'. Do I like that? No, I don't, but it is what it is.
According to JetBrains

> Neither we nor our service providers use your data or code for training any generative models.

This is some very weasel-wording stuff written by a lawyer. It probably means their parent company can use the code for training, they just can't do it directly.
Only if you insist on saying Heil Hitler non-stop. Besides that, no.

Even then, Nazi salute is being used on my country's parties and everyone shrugs.
Hell is living in a place where you have a 1 in 70 chance of being a victim of a violent crime per year, and being gaslit by extremely co-dependent people into having more empathy for narcissist sociopaths than their traumatized innocent victims.

If people don't want to do serious jail time they shouldn't do serious crimes, the contract couldn't possibly be more simple. The purpose of incarceration isn't to coddle murderers, it's great if they change their life but ultimately it's to extract murderers from society so decent people can live peaceful and successful lives and anything else beyond that is ancillary.
That's why the call it subjective decline.
He wasn't fired for his political beliefs. He was fired for persistently heckling a senior leader during a public presentation, which meets anyone's definition of gross insubordination. He could have gone on a tirade about how Google supports putting ketchup on hot dogs and the result would have been the same, in Europe or the US.
The limited liability is for financial risks.

Endangering the health of the public like for example dumping toxic waste or destroying a safety culture are criminal.

If Boeing decided to build a 797 story that was even bigger than the Airbus 380 and lost a lot of money, then limited liability would kick in. However, to deliberately cut safety culture and endanger the public is criminal.
Depends on the thing and the place. In Germany you cannot do a Sieg Heil salute in public, for obvious reasons - and even that is loosely enforced. But you're absolutely allowed to protest.
Without putting blame on anyone, this does show a fundamental issue with the open core model. It is built on the premise that your "open" product will not be as good as possible, so you can still have the higher priced "enterprise" product.

I think it's fair to point that out. Usually, you expect that developers want to create software that is "as good as possible". They may have a different idea what exactly "good" means, but you usually don't expect that an open source project will actively want to be worse than it could be. But "open core" is exactly that: It's a software trying to be worse than it could be.
"Stoners deny cannabis bad"
I wonder if it's related to the fact stoners are likely to go to bed on time.
I was going to say that their own lives being at risk probably helps keep them awake. But then I remembered people fall asleep while driving on the highway quite often.
That's not a "problem", it's by design. As long as cooling extracts enough heat to keep the system running at full speed, it is doing its job well and the heat is the result of that. Until we start using photonic processors or something, there is no way around physics. It's a wonder we can even do that on a tiny laptop in the first place.
I think the problem is entitlement more than terminology.
No, of subjective cognitive decline. Not decline as measured through testing, decline as self-reported.

Basically pot makes you less self-aware.
This is a fairly rational view that acknowledges your own limitations (or limited attention budget to invest in this topic), and accepts that given the high levels of disinformation, you'll be unlikely to reach any reasonable conclusions without a big effort.

I think this makes sense if you don't want to put in the time/effort to study it yourself, this rational approach of withholding judgement is commendable.

It's a sad testament to the polluted nature of this essential topic that this is where it is tho: that without dedicate effort you are unlikely to gain real insight.

We can think of this as if an effective "topic area denial" has been placed over this topic, obstructing any but the most focused/talented efforts to obtain information.

I think that says something, too: why expend so much treasure to create confusion about something if there's nothing to hide?
What exactly is fair and thoughtful about keeping on an employee that shouts down a company representative giving a public presentation.

I don’t understand how anyone could even think a company—or any enterprise—is morally required to pay people that publicly work against its chosen strategy.
Subjective cognitive decline is a 'subjective' because it is perceived by the individual themselves. This means one of:

1) Weed dramatically reduces cognitive impairment.

2) Weed dramatically reduces an individual's ability to accurately asses their cognitive ability.

3) People who use weed are, for some other reason, dramatically less likely to suffer from cognitive impairment, or dramatically less able to accurately evaluate their own cognitive state.

4) The study itself is biased or flawed somehow.
Now only if other countries can also grow some balls against these monopolies we all could have better things.
Gayle hopes T20 World Cup can help cricket crack U.S. market
Yes you can. Nobody's stopping you from engaging in politics outsider of work(go vote, write to your congressman, go protest, etc), and nobody'd forcing you to work at a company that does things you disagree with. But at work, you go to do work in exchange for money.

The publicly listed company must do what its shareholders want, it has no obligation to do what its employees want, and as long as the company doesn't break any local government laws and employment laws, then it's in the green. You disagreeing with the company's direction is your own matter to deal with, as in, you are free to walk since the company isn't forcing you to work there against your will.

You have no idea what authoritarianism actually means.
That's the definition of Open Core. You cannot say open core and also say they didn't accept the PR for a feature that is there in EE.
I think the blocks are one part of it, and the other part is that S3 doesn’t support renaming or moving objects, and doesn’t have directories (just prefixes). Whenever I’ve seen something with filesystem-like semantics on top of S3, it’s done by using S3 as a storage layer, and building some other kind of view of the storage on top using a separate index.

For example, maybe you have a database mapping file paths to S3 objects. This gives you a separate metadata layer, with S3 as the storage layer for large blocks of data.
You don’t even know what game we are playing.
Elon Musk Has a Giant Charity. Its Money Stays Close to Home
MN10 as in my earlier comment is the starting point. The German monk Nyanaponika Thera provides a detailed exposition.

https://www.bps.lk/library-search-select.php?id=bp509s

https://archive.org/details/10011341809-the-heart-of-buddhis...
And they absolutely love that you, and every other user, sends them every original image you choose to edit

So when you make a meme or whatever and repost it somewhere else, guess what, they know who did that!
Although some of the success of the old bell labs was because it was a monopoly, so it could afford long term investment. It’s a different environment now.
Disappointing that the maintainers need to make a living (or, godforbid, even a profit) and that users can't get everything for free? Nope.