skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Glow is great! Love all the charm.sh projects. Only gripe is that I don't seem to be able to use tab autocomplete with glow.
Heh. I had some of that "character building", and I credit that I don't seem to have as fragile a temperament as some to it. It worked for the Germans and Huns and Mongols. Too bad we can't run the counterfactual and see if we would be the same across different timelines.
Star Trek TNG Captain's Chair Heads to Auction in March
I think you're operating on maybe 5+ year old thinking on this problem. Post-COVID, the "exurbs with hour long commutes" have become significantly more desirable, as people have gone fully or partially remote. The "penalty" of the long commute has gone down while the benefits of space, affordability, and community type have gone up. The world is obviously figuring out the Return to Office thing but overall the commute is a less big deal than it once was.

This dynamic means that folks who own what you correctly categorize as owning "detached single family homes in (or close) to desirable cities" who no longer care about the commute might be overall willing to sell these homes in favor of larger/more affordable homes further out, freeing up these homes to those for whom city proximity still matters.

I think there are really two core demographics at play with a small middle. There are those who are all about the city life - don't want a car, don't want a house, want to walk to work and to the tinder date, be around a large number of diverse people and experiences, etc. Then there are those who primarily orient their life around home/family and want the space/affordability. Distance to city mainly matters as a factor of the commute, which itself is less relevant than it was before.

Then there's the relatively smaller group that both wants a house and needs to be close to the city life. This group will continue to pay the highest costs because they have the highest demand but I think that's reasonable.
> Would Dennis take a massive risk by cancelling a 6 year project as he became CEO? Definitely. He's between a rock and a hard place. I can't see that he's at fault.

You're inventing a false dichotomy here. The problem with MCAS was not that it was approved at all, the problem was that it was scrubbed from the documentation and that the company decided to not train pilots on it. The 10 second reaction time would be plenty if the pilots had a mental model for what the hell was happening, but they didn't because Boeing decided to skip training on it and pretend that flying the Max 8 was the same as flying any of the older models.

Muilenburg was in the driver's seat during the interval between first test flight and FAA approval. He was in the driver's seat when the first plane was delivered. He was in the driver's seat when the first crash happened. He was in the driver's seat when the second crash happened. We can speculate about whether or not he was looped in on any one of the decisions that led here, but it was ultimately his responsbility to be looped in where needed and to set expectations for how Boeing was run.

I get that there's a strong desire among engineers on HN to believe that "our people" wouldn't let things like this happen, but you're going to great speculative lengths to place the blame on MBAs when the simpler answer is that an engineer as CEO actually did allow this to happen and then, when pressed, repeatedly refused to acknowledge that Boeing screwed up [0].

To be clear, I'm not saying this to vilify Muilenburg, I'm simply saying that the narrative that this is a question of McDonnell Douglas MBAs vs old-school Boeing engineers is wrong. The system is much more complicated than that, and people who place the blame on MBAs are projecting their own career frustrations, not rationally analyzing the facts.

[0] https://www.c-span.org/video/?460231-1/boeing-shareholders-m...
I hope you are aware that Tiktok doesn't generate content by itself? A comparison with BBC is stupid.
I would potentially be interested in Gaudi-based workstation. Supermicro servers seem good, but they do not have DisplayPort outputs, and jury-rigging them on is not something I'd do.
> I worked for a guy who thought he was "helping" by barging in and distracting me, whenever he saw me in deep thought. I finally confronted him on it, and he thought this helped the creative process!

My wife used to do a similar thing.

Since the "deep thought" look is very similar to the "annoyed" look, she thought she'd lighten the mood by sending me funny things to look at and then demand I go look at them, and then she'd get annoyed that I didn't react.

Sorry, honey, I'm juggling a mental model of multiple functions and classes. The Humor module is currently disabled.

Like you, I finally had to set the boundary. When I'm in hyperfocus mode, DO NOT DISTURB unless it's important and can't wait. Don't even ask me if I want something to drink. Your assistance is not needed.
If Google becomes a de facto monopolist, then the EU is more likely to restrict its market power further, up to and including divestiture.
Was there any control input limit on the AIs? Like if the AI couldn't click buttons or move the mouse faster than a very fast human.

In a similar vein, it would be fascinating if the AI had to also evade bot detection, that is appear (nearly) indistinguishable from a human player.
If you are low key insulting your child regularly, they won't de better then kids of parents who treat them well. Kids who think low of themselves usually don't even try.

So, I am skeptical.
> Unix terminals have had it for decades, and I have never seen anybody complain.

Probably because you don't see the autocomplete there unless you specifically ask for it. This is a world apart from editors that automatically pop up autocomplete options. Those are an unwelcome distraction.

If Unix shells behaved like that, I'd strenuously object.
Maybe they still cost $400K, because the purchase of the land, the labor and the materials and the interest to finance the project eat up most of that $400K, not to mention some places charge you building permits that cost ten's of thousands of dollars - if not more.

Nobody is going to build houses and sell them at a loss or at break-even price, they need to cover their costs and make some profit as well to keep the business alive.
Why `nix develop`, not `nix shell` or `nix profile`? Because you're also packaging the final result with nix anyway or something?

> nix develop starts a bash shell that provides an interactive build environment nearly identical to what Nix would use to build installable. Inside this shell, environment variables and shell functions are set up so that you can interactively and incrementally build your package.

I'm not saying it's bad or wrong - it's a long time since I've used nix and it's changed/progressed a lot, and I'm considering it again so just keen to understand.

edit: also just found shell.nix & nix-direnv integration - https://nix.dev/tutorials/first-steps/declarative-shell#decl...
Stripes 2023 Annual Letter
If you've got an answer for how to strike that balance you'd best start writing essays for the Federalist Papers 2nd Edition.

Because obviously you can do whatever you want with your property: well not open a business because it's not zoned for that, and not build too close to the property line, but anything else! Oh and you can't make too much noise after 9pm that's just rude, or fix your own electrical work because if you do a shoddy job it'll catch your neighbor's house on fire, and...
Yes, and Americans should have the freedoms to receive whatever information they want, including whatever is on Tik Tok. This is covered by the first amendment.
What's behind the Bitcoin price surge?
50 years I think puts here them highly in danger zone... That means 1970s... Which have whole host of very well known issues. Now 100 or even 70 year old houses... If not ruined in 70s-90s by renovation...
PromptFox: high quality Midjourney prompts
As a traditional artist, at first, I had conflicting sentiments about generative AI. The fact that centralized companies were scrapping and using content from people who poured years of work into felt wrong.

But I can't deny the massive opportunity it created for everyone to explore their creative ideas, and redefine the base level of the global output of art.

The first months were so exciting, with everyone experimenting and sharing their newly found insights. Nowadays, I find more and more people being secretive about their process and their prompts…

That's not the vision I want for this space. If we're crowdsourcing the work of millions of artists, gatekeeping your own feels wrong to me. I want an open space where ideas are shared, remixed, and applied in an infinite number of ways.

I made Prompt Fox to share my best prompts (you can send me yours to be featured if you wish). Since I'm a freelance designer, I focused on high-quality prompts that can be used in any professional project.

Let me know what you think!
TIL: Show current C function in Vim status line sans plugins
He provides the cost breakdown in the blog.
Low level languages were so much more hassle than we have to deal with today. Try coding something trivial in assembly or some business logic in C and you will quickly see what I mean. Higher level languages became popular as they offered quite a bit more bang for the buck in terms of dev effort and what could be accomplished with relative ease. Thats how I remember it. I think AI will end up doing the same thing with high level languages.
The Problem with AI
can it be used for whisper and asr as well? I would buy it if its cheaper.
No Bottle Rocket?

I think that is the best.
Profit is not the standard for the regulation of commerce in the United States though.

When the federal government set limits on crop production with the Constitution's Interstate Commerce Clause as its justification, Roscoe Filburn was simply growing wheat over the limit to feed his farm animals. That wheat was never sold, and it never crossed the property line to leave his farm, much less crossed state lines. The government still fined him and he lost his case in SCOTUS establishing precedent in Wickard v. Filburn, because it affected the market prices of wheat, despite the miniscule impact.

The same could be said of TikTok even if it doesn't earn a penny in profit.
Well almost all freshwater fishing in the USA is now unsafe to eat, toxic industrial zones are purposely allowed around populated areas, fracking is making people ill even hundred miles downwind, leaded gas is still used many decades later in prop planes at every airport

We've basically poisoned the entire country for profit and it's starting to really add up.

https://www.businessinsider.com/rainwater-no-longer-safe-to-...

https://www.propublica.org/article/toxmap-poison-in-the-air

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pfas-forever-chemicals-one-fish...

There's no undo button, we're done.
We're all clear on that the ultimate outcome depends on which lobbyists pay better, right?
I don't understand why everyone assumes I'm talking down on him. I'm merely pointing out how irrelevant that quote is.

> how many of those million-ish "smarter" people had any real interest in founding a graphics card company? Or any sort of company, period?

That's not the right question. The right question is: how many of those even had the opportunity to do this? I'd doubt it's more than a single digit.

He made it. Congrats to him. But we don't know why he made it. No, it wasn't because he "suffered". It wasn't because he worked hard. We quite simply can't know.

If you can't attribute his success to what he is saying, it's not relevant. Now that he made it, he can proclaim it was any of his millions of choices, but by definition it cannot be a few generic choices, because many more made the same choices and never made it.

Luck is a stub for all of the infinite choices and events that conspired for him to be where he is today. It's nice to pretend it's hard work that leads to success (or in this case "pain and suffering"), but it's most definitely not true.
Sad news.... alternatively use https://citra-emulator.com or the archive.org repository for source codes and compiled binaries.
Interesting! This would sort of explain the low energy of the human demonstrator in the video

"Take 488... action!"
// To solve the housing crisis you have to build up like the Soviets

My family lived in a communal apartment[0] for about 30 years in the USSR waiting for a place of our own. Whatever definition of "housing crisis" you are operating with, is heaven on earth compared to the Soviet housing reality.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communal_apartment
If you've never seen anyone work with syntax highlighting off, there are some YouTube videos that inspired me to try coding with syntax highlighting off:

1. "Hacking with Andrew and Brad" - Andrew Gerrand (previously on the Go core team) uses Vim without syntax highlighting.[0]

2. "Advanced Embed With Go Generate - Andy Walker" -- this guy uses bold/italics/few colors in his editor. Interesting visual on how you can use font to show different aspects of the code.[1][2]

3. "Visual Studio Code, No Syntax Coloring, Go Fonts" [3]

4. "stb programming FAQ" - Sean Barrett answers why he uses VC6 and why his syntax highlighting is so minimal.[4]

[0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rZ-JorHJEY
[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnWpuoWzEj0
[2]: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/loLLjjRBK-k
[3]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgc1045AsMA
[4]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BYKiOHdCNg
Hmm, I haven't thought this far into it, what matters is probably how long the persistence of vision of the human is.

For the LG CX OLED (https://tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/lg_cx_oled) (oddly one of the only OLEDs that have BFI) we can see they have no problem pulsing the pixels on on for only 3-4ms (https://tftcentral.co.uk/images/lg_cx_oled/bfi_120_high.png) (5ms divisions), resulting in these images (which I can't tell how representative of a human are because I don't know if the camera exposure matches human vision and the camera is probably wobbling at such high speeds, adding more blur than a human would see which is why these pursuit camera pictures are always blurry to hell - IIRC all those LCDs from the last 6 years with half working BFI aren't actually blurry, they are just buggily implemented so they have the top of the screen and/or bottom showing double images, each image is crisp, just doubled):

https://www.tftcentral.co.uk/images/lg_cx_oled/pursuit_120hz...

https://tftcentral.co.uk/images/lg_cx_oled/pursuit_60hz.jpg

If you just take a 240Hz OLED and blank 3/4 frames to get back a 60Hz image I'd be half surprised if that actually looks blurrier than a CRT.

EDIT: yup, just tested one of my garbage LCDs even on 75Hz with BFI enabled in the monitor menu, the image is perfectly crisp, just there are artifacts everywhere, mainly double images. That wouldn't happen with OLED with BFI (with BFI in the hardware/firmware obviously to minimize the on time beyond just dividing the frame rate).
They've already produced over 1000 of the ~ 2400 they are expected to produce.

As for upgrades.. they're behind schedule.[0] There's Tech Refresh 3, which looks to be improved computers/displays/software, which is needed for Block 4, "which will include new sensors, the ability to carry more long-range precision weapons, more powerful data fusion, increased interoperability with other platforms and advanced electronic warfare capabilities."[1]

[0] https://www.defensenews.com/air/2023/03/30/f-35-upgrades-sli...

[1] https://www.defensenews.com/air/2023/12/15/f-35-head-warns-f...
Your comment contradicts even itself, and is refuted by several comments in this thread.
Do you know this for a fact or are you speculating?
Yesterday there were 500 comments on the accouncement https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39679787
This simplification misses key nuances. Strategies like Tit-for-Tat (TFT) are context-sensitive and not universally "optimal." Effectiveness varies with game structure, communication clarity, and the presence of noise. Moreover, the "optimal" strategy adjusts in finite games (which you didn't clarify which type of game) due to the endgame effect.

Simple hole in your simplification: one simple misunderstanding could lead to an endless cycle of defection where everyone will defect on each other: game over.
You are falsely assuming an equivalence between homeownership and residency. Renters and household dependents make up a significant portion of residents in large cities.
The LASD literally has multiple gangs internally.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_LASD_deputy_gangs
It's honestly incredibly lucky for us that the Chinese propagandists couldn't resist pulling the bias trigger over issues that don't really matter. Talk about keeping your powder dry.

They could easily have pretended TikTok was a neutral actor until they needed to sway US opinion over Taiwan (or something bigger). Instead they made the control obvious on a dozen issues and are going to get cut off way earlier.
I can see your point. Thanks.
Thanks! Either of these tools allow you to see where an airframe was assembled?
Yeah. A lot of the value in open source is in letting people see how the thing works, and giving them the freedom to then adapt those solutions to other contexts.
The most cyberpunk thing I've seen are the various aerospace "offices" around the Beijing airport.

They're basically tiny bunkers, surrounded by fences and barbed wire.
> Homelessness in San Francisco doesn't kill you from the elements in January or July.

This would be equally true of other large cities in the southern half (including July for many), and none of them have anywhere near the same rate. Notwithstanding, northern cities have indoor shelters and if the cold mattered that much, the rates would be quite small, but they're not. In expensive cities like NY, homelessness rates are high.

See here https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/everything-you-think-you-know-...
Right -- I think there are ways to cultivate resilience in children without inflicting the bad kind of pain and suffering.

Severe disappointment, frustration, and discomfort as the result of their own decisions? Sure.

Actual abuse? Not so much.
Opposing this ban isn't "malicious intent" lots of people think it's an infringement upon their rights for the US government to decide what they can and cannot see.
Previously there were two wolves, it seems now they have gotten super majority.
Socialising is still a very important part of games (eSports, dungeons and raids, Discord / TeamSpeak / Ventrilo, forums, guilds, etc), especially for MMOs.

Much more than chess which is mostly a individually played game whereas an MMO is a cooperative game.
I would disagree. The Piazza dei miracoli (where the tower is) is genuinely amazing[1]. The duomo is really beautiful. You can see the actual incense lamp that inspired Galileo to formulate the theory about the motion of pendulums. The church of san stefano[2] is pretty cool. There are some great restaurants (one of the best restaurants I've ever been to in Italy is in Pisa). etc etc

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piazza_dei_Miracoli

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santo_Stefano_dei_Cavalieri,_P...
M3 MacBook Air hits eye-popping 114° Celsius in stress test and didn't melt
Oh hey, I wrote something similar as part of a web framework (https://github.com/gospel-sh/gospel), not officially released yet as I’m working on reactive client-side rendering and a few other things.
thank you since the original article garden walled.
The title is inaccurate. This is not a ban on TikTok, it is legislation requiring TikTok to be sold, so that is not owned by the Chinese communist government. This has been discussed several times before here, yet people still think it's a ban. That's wrong.
> Out of all the fields that human do professionally, sports will be one of the last ones to disappear. The fact that it is (unaugmented) humans competing is the entire point.

This is my thought/hope for what we'll expect in the coming years as AI's automation becomes more commonplace. Society's interests will start going towards activities that showcase human ability - sports, livestreaming (very much its own industry now, but mostly for socializing, art, and gaming), performance, dance, etc. Sure AI can 'do' these things, but not at the level elite performers can or with the subtle nuisances in human personalities.
I said I don't do luxury... But Buick is generally a step up.

Much like day Red Lobster is a steep up from Long John Silvers. It's not luxury but you are paying for and getting more.
Yeah, the vast majority of wealthy individuals will insist they "pulled themselves up by their own bootstraps" without realizing the original saying was meant to be satire, while willfully ignoring the hilarious amount of help from family, friends, and, yes, the government as well, they received along the way. They also ignore the biggest factor in success: luck.

This is also why 99% of CEO written self-help books are worker drone manuals --- insisting "you could be like me if you worked real hard too!" helps their bottom-line much more than it helps the person who reads those books.
Conversely, it can also be very annoying when you accidentally select some of the UI text and you have to manually deselect it (or maybe you can't deselect it).
I'd echo the same sentiment as the other commenters, if you don't mind me throwing my hat into the ring. Considering a MS in Data Science with a focus on ML
Don't try to make it a "both sides" issue. It's not.
They should post a link to the book. I want to read it now.
Easily impressed? These are difficult tasks! Even being able to grip the apple without crushing it is impressive.

Not sure anything here is state of the art, but that doesn’t make it easy.
On non-Linux it should be faster/less overhead; on all platforms I suppose it's just arguably easier/quicker to make changes & 'rebuild', and then the result is that that just is your environment, it's not a container inside it that you have to exec into or run commands through or make your IDE use or whatever.

But mostly it's just two different approaches and people will be happy to argue about why there's is better, or that they don't use either (just the system environment (on a non-NixOS system..) as it were).
Those are not equivalent as I hint in my last paragraph, different countries and gvmt influence do have different risk factors. You can e.g. criticize the US gvmt in a US-based app with no consequences. Good luck doing that in China (that = criticizing the CCP on a Chinese-based app while living in China).
I've been programming for over 45 years, since I was 14. I consciously made the choice, back around 2005, to NOT move into task management, but to remain a working software engineer. Writing software is what I love; had I become a manager of programmers, I'd have been miserable. (I tried it for six months, actually; I was miserable.) If you find the jobs farther up the ladder challenging and exciting, go for it. But I've found I was able to build a career on being the "person who programs things well".
The UAW Has Set Its Sights on the Anti-Union South
Dota's yearly competition, TI7 means "The International 2017"
Nobody actually wants to read LLM-generated soup. That's just a waste of everyone's time.

If you're making a highly interactive, dynamic game, you don't even need detailed language for NPC interaction. You may as well use simple templates or even symbols.
This is the best way to connect to your instances. However you still need the SSM agent installed and the right IAM permissions.
Ownership isn't the only way to control a social media platform. It is, admittedly, a simpler way.
Canada and the UK have woeful housing shortages. They're not doing much, if any, better than the US is.