skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My mother was a Manager at an insurance company for a very long time. She still firmly believes that one cannot get a 5 out 5 on a review because no one is perfect. Business likes to set unobtainable goals like that. In my experience, that kind of corporate behavior drives high performers away. High performers know what they have done and if you refuse to acknowledge it over time they leave.
The animations are useful when you can't easily see the instantaneous change, but I'm with you on the slowed feedback. I think the best feedback would be for the slider to move instantly, but with a fading motion blur effect. So if you're hard of seeing, or blink, or whatever and miss the change in state initially, there is still an animation playing that you can see to know that something changed, but at the same time the button is already at its new state, so you don't have to wait if you are paying attention.

Or we can go back to normal checkboxes and radio buttons where the on/off state is obvious and no animation is necessary to help people see when they change state.
How much noise would these electric giant drones add if they became as popular as gray coach buses?
You may seek medical care, but you won't need medical care.
Camera manufactures can come up with a cryptographic watermark for the pictures their camera takes or not, but blockchain really adds nothing to equation.
The non-noobs also don't have all the skills. The main skill is being able to progress towards a goal even though you don't know how, by searching for others that have done similar things and adapting their instructions.

Some starter goals:

* Get a Raspberry Pi

* Assemble the case for it, format the SD card, start the OS

* Install PiHole & Tailscale

* Setup Tailscale on your phone so that you can use PiHole on the go

* Adjust your router so that most devices go through PiHole

* Get a more powerful router or OpenWRT software for the router so that you can do hairpin NAT to reroute everything to the PiHole.

* Attach a hard drive to your Raspberry Pi...
Except it's a lie. The modal did show up for some people, but it was closable via an 'X'.
In the post it explicitly says you can train on 2 3090 level cards which are significantly cheaper and the headline literally says "Finetune" Not "Pretrain"
It's probably a matter of definition, but I think it's useful to distinguish forgiving and (re)trusting.

IMO this is the most important distinction on this topic, whatever definition you give.
The difference between:

- to forgive (that is, letting go of negative feelings, accepting what happened), and to

- to trust (that what happened would not happen again).

You definitely don't need the other person (or their actions) for the former.
But you need evidence of some change for the latter.
(Ideally you need the other person to acknowledge what and why it happened, and following actions to attest to the new behaviour)

You can easily forgive a child that somehow misbehaved, without any work or interaction on their part, and have zero hard feelings. Which is different from trusting that the child's behaviour has changed.

Mixing forgiving and trusting, as is done throughout the article, is not at all productive.

You seemed to have forgiven them, but you don't trust them. How could you?
Illicit fan fiction. Whether it's image or text models.

It's ALWAYS illicit fan fiction.
How can that not be considered a freedom of speech issue or markedly different from a voice actor who can do a spot-on impersonation of a public figure?
I would actually wonder if the hitler version had a different take.
Getting an aircraft certified and then scaling up manufacturing is extraordinarily difficult. The most likely exit plan for Joby and other eVTOL start-ups has always been to demonstrate technical viability and then get acquired by Airbus or one of the other big aerospace companies for the IP.
Trying to submit something, you are bound to a fixed list of categories and alternatives.

If what you want to submit doesn't fit the fixed values in there, you are blocked.
Forgiveness engages the highest orders of intelligence in us. It is a highly non-linear dynamic which is hard to analyze.
I can't speak to if it's more or less efficient, but I have one PC taking backups that's running at 43W idle. A different PC based server, which is a much more highly specced retired desktop, is running at 72W idle.
Before you give advice, you ask questions and build the necessary basis that allows you to adopt your knowledge to the particular use case. If you do not do that, you fail. You even fail with good ideas, because you do not get buy in from the people.

So yes, hubris is a rather good word for that kind of behaviour.
SBF's Sentencing Game Theory
The article suggests "Significant Other Acceptance Parameters" (SOAP), which I like better anyway since it involves parameters which seem targeted to the individual, rather than a broad factor targetted at the device.

The device hits all my SOAPs, vs the WAF is high.
Ambition, persistence, and confidence play a role too. Some people do not take No for an answer and keep trying.
It's a good thing Airbus made this and not Boeing.
That's all great, but then there are the times when they don't offer to copy the credentials where they should. Maybe the "correct" URL was too narrowly defined to be useful, or was taken from the setup context and is otherwise wrong for regular usage.... maybe the site changed their authentication process... etc. In the end, all of this tends to defeat the very resistance to the manual entry impulse you describe. If these password manager entry systems worked more flawlessly, your point would carry more weight... but having to defeat the protection your assertion relies upon is commonplace enough in legitimate purposes that it may well be nullified at all times.

In the end, as long as a site is going to use username/password authentication there will always be the need to educate users about what to expect sans the aid of tools.
It looks like the set of a 2000's kids TV programme.
Presumably you're comparing to the hysteria around the rocket falling back to Earth from some time ago.

While the hysteria was a little overblown, there was a pretty important difference, these batteries were heavy and dense, making them pretty likely to pretty much entirely burn up on the way down. The rocket body was large and lightweight, so it was more likely to have debris survive all the way down to the surface.

On top of that, this was an exceptional circumstance, the planned controlled disposal ended up becoming unavailable and potentially grounded for months, while the batteries were an increasing safety hazard. On the other hand, that rocket was intentionally designed this way with no regard for attempting to perform a controlled reentry.
Once you leave Europe it's depressing how badly the world has fallen since the site started - routes via Syria are out, Sudan is a no-go area, Russia is closed to westerners, ferries across the Med to Israel and Egypt have vanished, So many long distance routes simply no longer doable.
So China should stop making fentanyl, right, or any other number of chemicals known to be bad, rather than the US control entry?
>"...and C and C++ but writing tools in them is like self-lobotomy."

C is a lower level language than Rust so sure it is harder to write complex tools. Modern C++ - writing tools is at worst as easy than Rust and way better in practice because of a huge amount of libraries to suit every taste and C++ being more expressive / supporting more programming paradigms.

Statement like yours are not doing any service to Rust. Rust advocacy can do very much without such "help". Hopefully it does not represent culture of Rust community in general.
It could only ever be good for some interactions, e.g. it would be terrible for when the screen is just three large buttons for super quick access. Mode switching would surely be awkward.

I think I remember some map apps experimenting in that direction, but I consider the locusmaps "magnifying glass" undisputed king of that hill (touch interaction for maps).
It should really be something like family acceptance factor. Your spouse is usually not the only person living with you for long periods of time you'd ideally like to accomodate as a permanent co-user of shared spaces.

That said, this writer never says anything about the general idea being wife-approvable as far as I can tell, just that putting a homelab in the living room will lead to a divorce. That is already gender-neutral but at least so far also not true. My homelab is in my living room and I haven't divorced. I had to wallmount a very large media cabinet in the television nook and cut holes for USB fans into it, and use fanless mini-PCs rather than 500 decibel used servers, but you can't even tell it's there if I don't tell you.

The article you linked even says right up top this is widely thought to be a sexist term but also different than what the guy here means. The article here is about being considerate of how you use limited shared space but the Wiki is about design elements being attractive to people who care what something looks like instead of just what it does. Stereotypically, it would have been the woman in the heteronormative relationships that cared but certainly that isn't the case in my house. My wife loves gadgets and buys random crap all the time and leaves them laying around wherever is most convenient. I'm the one that cares deeply about neatness and my living space actually looking like a living space and not like I live in a data center.
Looks very cool! Will check it out later. FYI - search on the docs isn't loading on safari for me
> I don't want the government telling me what software I can use.

But you're ok with a foreign government controlling what your kids see on their app?
"Some set an ambitious goal of reading 200 pages each week, while others set a more moderate goal of reading 50 pages per week. All of these individuals read the same amount – 100 pages – but those who didn’t meet their goal were seen as less powerful by study participants."

Under-promise, over-deliver.
Satoshi and others spoke about this on the mailing list but one of the original ideas or use cases behind Adam Back's hashcash and other Proof-of-work methods involved or was centered around research to stop the proliferation of automated spam.

> Can you explain how blockchain is saving us from AI shitting over the internet?

One of the original use cases was the defense against Sybil Attacks: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sybil_attack
To make it prohibitively expensive to attack the network.

Also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_fraud#Ballot_stuffin...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sybil_attack#Identity_validati...
Self hosting matrix, vs. XMPP vs. signal vs. IRC over Tor?
USE CASE

i want to chat with one or more people i know in real life over a private, secure, and anonymous instant messenger, it needs to have these features

1: private: no adversary including but not limited to the united states federal government can find out who is sending the message or who is receiving the message

2: secure: no adversary including but not limited to the united states federal government can read the message

3: anonymous: no adversary including but not limited to the united states federal government can find out where the message is sent from, or being sent to.

4: entirely self hosted, NOT relying on the services of a third party or the servers of a third party, the only hardware involved is my laptop, the other guys laptop, and the internet at large.

5: no federation: i want true and absolute decentralization, no registration with a central authority, i want to create a server that is completely separate from any and all networks, i want it to be part no network except the network that is the internet itself.

6: server is password secure, no one can join the server except those who i have given the password to.

7: i need to be able to run it over the tor network

8: it cannot store any data, once the server is shut down all text records are gone and can never be recovered.

9: the server can stay on for a discretionary amount of time, if i need the server to be on for 5 minutes? fine, if i need the server to be on for the rest of my natural life? fine.

with this specific use case in mind, i have been told that either matrix, xmpp, or irc is what i need to use, given this specific use case scenario, what would you say?

thank you
There is a price to easy. In my experience, cargo build times tend to be soulkillingly long. But I don't like waiting more than a few hundred ms for incremental builds. So for me, cargo build is actually harder than make to attain an enjoyable build system.

Make is annoying but Makefile issues are found quickly and easily when running `find . | entr -c make` and saving the source file often.
Aircraft in this class are often labeled as "powered lift" to differentiate them from conventional helicopters or fixed-wing airplanes.
There are far fewer KKK members than black people in America. Why should I go out of my way to comfort them?
For a number of years, I toyed with building a site about US lighthouses with maps. Then I discovered this guy's site who has visited every one with photos, maps, and descriptions. I decided I'd find another project :-)

https://www.lighthousefriends.com/index.html

I love all the essentially remnants of the old Internet that obsessively chronicle some niche thing.
The real reason is that author wanted to use Rust ( as he previously done ) and does not really care about improving existing solution.

From the start you want to use x.y.z tech then the justification is meaningless.
I am a DV engineer, and I'm going to give some candid feedback: CI tooling is not what I spend most of my non-coding or verification-planning time on, so I wouldn't find much use out of this tool. Now that wasn't always true – I used to work somewhere that had horrible CI tooling. But that's just because the company didn't invest in someone to maintain that infrastructure. Given that, I don't think they'd pay an external vendor for a tool and require someone to maintain that tool as well.

However, I do have some problems that you may want to consider pivoting to or adding in the future:

1. A wrapper that works with all of the tools that EDA vendors offer as a back-end. Basically, CMake for SystemVerilog where I can just run `make` and compile, elab, and sim run in order. Every company I've worked for has made their own wrapper program which essentially re-creates this process and I've had to relearn it several times. If you had this wrapper, then you could easily just use other CI/CD pipeline which calls this tool. Bonus points if you can integrate it with VUnit or SVUnit unit testing frameworks.

2. SystemVerilog code generation. Something smarter than just "I wrote a Python script that prints SystemVerilog code to a file based on some config file and then you run your build with the file the Python just printed."

I'm sure there are others that I am not thinking of. But overall, I don't find a lack of CI to be the problem. It's the lack of tools that a CI pipe uses that's the problem.

ETA: Also, was it intentional to launch right on the tail of DVCon? If so, clever planning.
Additionally, a lot of these niche laptop brands don't even manufacture their own laptops because they're not even at the scale where designing and manufacturing a board and chassis would be financially viable. Many are white-label or ODM laptops. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_design_manufacturer
Or automotive, the large aerospace OEMs could do it themselves. Bad news for those start-ups is the push to EVs really heated up by now, automotive OEMs have their hands full.

Those IP acquisitions are tricky so. The IP has to be really advanced and good, say A220 good, and even then the question remains if the price will even close to the total funding those companies got.
To start with, I really enjoyed Veritaseum’s recent take on the “Prisoners Dillema” and Game Theory (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mScpHTIi-kM). It seems appropriate to mention since it circles around this same “dillema” and even places a numerical value on the value of forgiving in game theory simulations. The historical part and layman’s reduction is good to.

I think THIS article undersells the “Hold a Grudge” payoff:

> David feels justified but might damage the relationship and stop Samantha from learning from her mistake.

Most relationships have an ongoing bargaining element to them. Exchange of services, tit for tat, quid pro quo, pay each others backs, etc. Even when we pretend they don’t, or obscure them by wrapping higher level words around them. What makes forgiving hard, is that when we feel wronged, we feel it gives us a better bargaining position go forward. If we forgive, we fear it devalues or weakens our bargaining power going forward. Why else are we so tempted in a debate to rejoin with “yeah, well you do <fill in the blank wrong thing> too!”

To clarify, I AM a big fan and proponent of forgiveness. I aspire to be better at. But I think this article has missed a key part of the dillema, by not better portraying the real allure of not forgiving.
Hmm why would someone on a forum called hacker news want to tinker and explore an exciting new technology. Who can say? One of life’s great mysteries really.
When people talk about Deutsche Bahn being unreliable, they are talking about the cross-country regional / ICE network, not city rail (S-Bahn etc in Berlin, Hamburg are frequent and pretty reliable).

You may have had a good experience here in Germany as a tourist, but it's simply not reality. Trains are not reliably on time here these days, and it's a huge problem.

I do not doubt the DART is unreliable in Dublin, the buses are just as bad (I moved to Germany from Dublin a little over a year ago). I know it's a bit apples to oranges comparison between Germany and Ireland, but I can assure you, it is bad here in Germany currently!
Yes; I've just tested it on GNU Make 4.3 and you are quite right. It only works when the *.c files are in the directory where object files are referenced. E.g.:

example: build/blah.o
echo nothing special
.PHONY: example

...requires blah.c to be in build/.
It is actually possible to produce healthier food from healthy plants in good soils, getting good yields with reduced costs. A plant that is healthy has a functioning immune system and is capable of warding of most, if not all pests (except for mammals and birds). You can only do this without pesticides, because the pesticides and fungicides are (mostly) what creates bad soils. And contrary to what a lot of people assume, this can be scaled as well.

Why is not everybody doing this at scale? Mostly I think because it requires advanced, state of the art knowledge and goes against current practice in some ways. We are only just finding out how plants actually take up nutrition (which is wild to me), and barely have uncovered the life in the soil. A lot of farmers are old, and their teachers espoused the view that soil life is literally irrelevant to farming and everything comes down to soluble fertilizers + pesticides, herbicides, fungicides. Crudely simplified it is the agricultural equivalent of putting someone on an intensive care bed, feeding them liquid food with a tube and killing every germ with antibiotics. It works and is not too hard, but the results aren't that good actually. Now try becoming a healthy person overcoming illness in the wild, its a bit more complex than feeding through a tube and taking antibiotics.

Creating healthy food in a healthy way requires much more knowledge and sometimes (not always) a bit more labor, and a lot of it is going against what people know. Agriculture doesn't like to take risks. A lot of money depends on things staying as they are. A couple of big failures and you are out. Its not as easily disrupted as software.

Take a look at the work of John Kempf if you want to find out more: https://advancingecoag.com/
I have the same problem with Rust modules:

e.g., where do I put crate::, vs module X, vs module X{ } again? Do I have to specify it in the automatic lib.rs too? Or ...

C at least lives on the filesystem and you tell it where to grab things.
Yeah. That move was annoying. I wanted to start using zsh as well but then found I need to port by bashrc and switched to bash back
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricochet_(software)
Wouldn’t they be a lot less efficient? This vehicle already does VTOL, and switches to wing flight for cruising, I don’t see how you could beat that.

On safety, the theory doesn’t always match reality, if I recall correctly Gyros are statistically one of the most dangerous recreational aircraft [source needed].
It's harder and harder to find small computers with internal power, because they've found that nobody counts the power brick in the "size" (remember the original Xbox?).

The best bet might be to wait until they've all finalized on USB-C.
"compared to "more accessible" languages and all their hidden gotchas"

----

Yes because APL or array languages in general have absolutely no hidden gotchas ...
since i still have to pay taxes, that is obviously false.
Anyone with the money can fly across the world to try to help. That doesn't make the help automatically useful.
I was happy to see the word “bolus” in this essay.
> Visible to visitors

Right, so they've gone to all this effort to generate input as close as possible to random, then they undermine it by opening it up to the public?

Would be interesting to see what the camera placement is like and if that's at least secure, otherwise someone's is just going to stick a still picture on the end of it...

If you're going to go to all this effort to create randomness, at least secure it from physical interference...

Sorry, I know I'm being a cynical here. This just feels like a marketing gimmick.
Investments where you have an outsized influence on the outcome are tightly regulated but great opportunities to watch out for.

Already maybe 100 steps ahead of you
It's not just that the posts are public, it's also that some unknown portion of your "buddies" on a place like Reddit or HN are actually female.

Slightly misogynistic jokes with a group of male friends who know you and know your SO (and presumably know how your relationship with her actually is) land completely differently than the same jokes in an anonymous online forum.
Ethereum and Bitcoin are really the only coins that suffer from congestion from time to time leading to high transaction costs. This is more apparent on Eth where contract interactions can lead to those high +$20 transaction costs, thats when it might be worth it to wait for when the congestion has cleared.

If you can avoid ethereum's main layer altogether it becomes much cheaper transact, most exchanges support the various l2 layers that have been popping up recently.

I do agree that it takes way too much time and effort for anyone not familiar to the crypto scene to figure out all the different chains, their compatibility, bridges, swaps etc. to make cost efficient transactions.
The "energy" here is the collective set of opinions of hackers, which seems to be tipping heavily towards TikTok (TikTok.app/TikTok.apk) being banned.

My belief is that the government should not ban software, and that we should be free to install anything that we wish on our computers. That's all.
Then, honey, I shall put the homelab in the bedroom!
This is kind of hybrid I guess, cross-platform on one level and a side platform on the other.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/19th_Street_Oakland_station
I don’t know. Building community from scratch is hard non technical task. I hope you will succeed.