skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't think you do get it. The company has lost $75B in market cap since this activist ruling and will likely lose much more going forward, especially if the ruling is not overturned on appeal.

Not only that, but I think it's a real loss for the US in general and Deleware in particular as a good environment for business that respects property rights. Some guy with nine shares of stock overrode the wishes of over 3/4 of the shareholders and his lawyers may extract billions from the company which the market clearly sees as having been harmed by their actions.
Nothing you wrote has a spec of evidence.
Create a step function map state which will run lambda function parallelly based on the count of input received to the step function. Table name and schema name will be passed to the step function. Lambda function should create table in redshift based on input received and load file from a s3 location to the newly created table
And you thought this would be a meaningful contribution to this post?
Companies in quite a few industries have a duty to do business with you, with very few limitations. For example, in some countries/cities, taxis generally can't refuse transportation to you, assuming you're able to pay and not endangering the driver. Having publicly and repeatedly expressed a dislike for taxis, or even wearing a t-shirt saying "taxis in $city are an overpriced monopoly" would not be a valid reason to be refused transportation.

In the EU/under the DMA, Apple now very likely has a duty to transact even with app developers saying mean things about them. That's certainly a very new situation for Apple, but not an unprecedented one.

I'm not sure if throwing more hissy fits and breaking more of their playmates' toys is a good idea now that adults are in the room.
What do you mean by "outside the .NET world"? F# is a .NET language (more specifically a CLR language). That question seems to be like asking "are Erlang and Elixir contenders outside of the BEAM world?" or "is Clojure a contender outside of the JVM world?".

F# being on top of the CLR and .NET is a benefit. It is very easy to install .NET, and it comes with a huge amount of functionality.

If you're asking if the language F# could be ported to another VM, then I'd say yes, but I don't see the point unless that VM offered similar and additional functionality.

You can use F# as if C# didn't exist, if that's what you mean, and by treating .NET and CLR as an implementation detail, which they effectively are.
NY Times issues DMCA takedowns of Wordle clones
Apparently got Toto's "Africa" as their radio listening secret message.

Appropriately cryptic result for messing with an old cable modem and turning it into a software defined radio.

I stopped an old man along the way
Hopin' to find some old forgotten words or ancient melodies
He turned to me as if to say
"Hurry, boy, it's waiting there for you"
Right.

But it seems like everyone agreed that they'd need a lot of money to train an AGI.
Wait, someone deleted my MySpace?
hopefully everyone involved regrets calling "Fancy Textual and Image Autocomplete" "artifical intelligence" after all this, as they move on to their next ridiculous VC-funded sinecure.
totally. for me the interplay between the host language and the target language is hardest thing for me to manage when bringing up a new environment. it really doesn't seem like it should be a big deal, but it comes down to the sad reality that we operate by rote alot of the time, and completely switching semantic modes when going between one world and the other is confusing and imposes a real cost.

I'm still not that good at it, but my best strategy to date is to try to work in a restricted environment of both the host and the target that are nearly the same.
Very cool, in many senses of the word.

We certainly need more of this.

More importantly, this may also reduce the heat-soaking of the earth underneath the city as well as the surrounding countryside.
How could a dictionary in the browsers that are pre-made with JS in mind fare? Aka instead of making a custom dictionary per resource I send to the user, I could say that "my scripts.js file uses the browser's built-in js-es2023-abc dictionary". So the browser's would have some dictionaries others could reuse.

What's the savings on that approach vs a gziped file without any dictionary?
So hypothetically, if things were different, it might not be okay... so it's okay now.
Attribution is easily deflected. You really don't want to recruit mercenary vigilantes to respond to a false flag operation.

> This tit for tat type response would seem to be more consistent with how governments respond to terrorism

Lol. Not a selling point these days.

The US has always had a very strange policy of criminalizing hacking, regardless of intent.

Places like Russia and Israel look the other way as long as the target is foreign, and we outsource our own phone forensics to the latter (Cellebrite). Thus, Israel has a better understanding of our own vulnerabilities than we do.

So you never know who you're up against given some ambiguous heuristics. As retribution, you might end up inadvertently attacking an "ally." It's safest to keep us disadvantaged.
Not an expert but I think its possible, the problem is that the gyroscope alone wouldn't be sufficient. When the gyro rotates once, the massive spacecraft will obviously have rotated exactly once relative to the gyroscope. However if you could track the space station's rotation relative to an independend stationary observer in space (lets say an array of pulsar data), then you could count the amount of turns of both the gyro and the spacestation relative to the background of space. Then the amount of turns of the gyro times the mass of the gyro would give you the mass of the space station minus the independend floating objects. Meaning you'll need to add the mass of the gyro itself as well.

Please correct me if i'm missing something obvious. This should work right?
You could, but few people are going to fall for that. Are you offering something that would entice people away, something huge like Fortnite? Most non-technical people will stick with the App store.
This reminds me of a quip I heard on twitter and found quite funny.

“Elon is the stupid people’s fantasy of what being smart is like, just like Trump can be a poor person’s fantasy of what being rich is like.”

Don’t agree entirely in the poor part, but the Elon part I find quite accurate.
Surely want you really want is free healthcare and higher education
> Just a quick question though if I may - why/when would I want a n>1 group to average instead of treating them all independently as in XmR?

Two reasons come to mind. First, for whatever reason, it might not be economical to measure every individual in the population. There might be too many, or the thing being sampled is a continuous flow (eg liquid product in a chemical processing plant) or perhaps the sampling is destructive (imagine a pressure failure test, or a reagent test).

Second, you might just naturally have a sample. For example, each YJIT benchmark is run multiple times because there's variability in the measurement not due to changes in YJIT. Since you have n runs of the benchmark, you naturally have a sample size of n. It doesn't make sense to think of them as consecutive measurements.

The rest of your comment goes to the business of selecting what the grouping of samples is (the term is "rational subgrouping"). A lot of pages are given to this question in the SPC books I've read, because it's not difficult to unintentionally mask signal by combining things that shouldn't be combined. An example is checking the precision of piston machining. It might be you take all the pistons in a given engine as your sample. But later you discover that one of your four machining stations is off-center, which was masked by the ordinary variation of the other three. In this case the sampling should have been per-station, not per-engine.
Thank you for this clarification, I was scratching my head at this, wondering if I had misremembered my entire childhood desktop publishing experience. IIRC the relative openness of TrueType encouraged/forced Adobe to open up their previously proprietary Type 1 fonts.
Barely 4 years old is not particularly old.
Chronicles of Opt Development
If I had a dollar for every time some slick SV website had a broken layout due to scrollbars, or tried to give me a seizure when scrolling with a mouse wheel, I might be able to buy a mac with more than 8GB of RAM.

Edit: To add a couple more: using system fonts without a suitable fallback, and not being careful with modifier keys when doing custom hotkeys
> “You should not care about anything unless it directly moves the bottom line,” and I reject that to my bones

I have a lot of empathy for that feeling. I've come across this often in my career and I have not enjoyed it. I enjoy building software that I'm proud off. Thank you for sharing your story!
Yes, using Day of Year for time GUIs and measurements is pretty common in spacecraft operations. Generally easier to do/plan operations for things like "we need to perform this maintenance activity every 5 days"
> c.f. having essentially missed the boat on AI

What boat? Not being first to market with a fancy commercial-grade model and charging $20/mo for consumer-style access (a la OpenAI)? Not having a cloud offering (MS, etc)? Not having a fancy in-your-pocket AI (like… no one? Siri is behind the times, and a better Siri would be great, but IMO the issue isn’t so much the quality of the language model but that Siri is oddly limited in what it can interact with).

I agree that Apple hasn’t been amazingly innovative in the last few years, but being off the AI hype boat seems off the mark.
Sorta, you are using hardware offload at a level above the vm. There are a lot of situations in which traffic can interact poorly with that nic. You won’t really be able to identify what traffic resulted in the nic responding because of a bug. I’m assuming you are not using sr-iov vf devices if you are managing offload at the parent. Probably for the best if it is that card.
Google's Genie game maker is what happens when AI watches 30K hrs of video games
Free speech has nothing to do with any of this
Maybe that stems from your experience but I don't think that's a fair expectation in general. Sharing detail about their approach could have all sorts of downsides. It might be they are still investigating multiple approaches and don't know which one they'll pick (this is usually what I mean when I say that). It might be the CEO doesn't want to disclose details about the work that would be better filtered through marketing. It could be they're trying to avoid leaking trade secrets.
Trinidadian English: "ent?"

I think there's an innate human desire to modify the sentence to make it a question with as few additional sounds as possible.
This comment explains it well: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39609172

To summarize: Laws are like lines of code. Nobody in their right mind would put programs on a spectrum between "more lines" and "fewer lines". Lines of code that help do the necessary work are good, and unnecessary lines of code are bad. And so it is with regulations.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/mar/18/myspace-l...

Myspace, the once mighty social network, has lost every single piece of content uploaded to its site before 2016, including millions of songs, photos and videos with no other home on the internet.

The company is blaming a faulty server migration for the mass deletion, which appears to have happened more than a year ago, when the first reports appeared of users unable to access older content. The company has confirmed to online archivists that music has been lost permanently, dashing hopes that a backup could be used to permanently protect the collection for future generations.

...
Pointing out Elon Musk's claims regarding free speech and the shit show he's been forcing upon Twitter, not to mention his temper tantrum directed at marketing teams for ditching post-Musk Twitter due to fears their ads could showcase alongside unsavoury content like racist posts and extremism in general, should be enough to figure out the worth of Elon Musk's word and the consequences of Elon Musk's judgement calls.
> I might be able to buy a mac with more than 8Gb of RAM.

Please, don't kid yourself.
Even putting aside CORS because I don’t even want to think about how this plays well with requests to another (tracking?) domain, this still doesn’t seem worth it. The explicit use case seems to be that it basically tells the server when you last visited the site based on which dictionary you have and then it gives you the moral equivalent of a delta update. Except, most browsers are working hard to expire data of this kind for privacy reasons. What’s the lifetime of these dictionaries going to be? I can see it being ok if it’s like 1 day but if this outlives how long cookies are stored it’s a significant privacy problem. The user visits the site again and essentially a cookie gets sent to the server? The page says “don’t put user-specific data in the request” but like nobody is stopping a website from doing this.
The sooner this "ecosystem" crap dies, the better.

The sooner not needing Apple dev tools or an Apple developer account to make software for an Apple device, the better.

The sooner I can use my Apple Watch with an Android phone, the better.

The sooner Apple stops (basically) requiring me to use icloud instead of literally any other better, cheaper, higher performance cloud service for my photos, videos, settings, and etc without nagging me 24/7 and trying to default to icloud storage, the better.

As a long time user and buyer of Apple products, I'd really rather they have robust security, stable APIs, good UI design standards (once again), and create/support open standards. All of this "ecosystem" "It's secure if you use it our way and only our way" and "it just works (most of the time)" BS is annoying me.

It's annoying, because over the last 20 years I've watched their products become weirder and more gimped and full of dark patterns in an attempt to force you to buy their services and/or lock you into buying nothing but Apple products.

And don't even get me started about the thriving group of Apple-Stans that play the "YOU DON'T LIKE IT?! THEN LEAVE! I LOVE IT! ITS PERFECT AND YOU SHOULD TOO!" game lol. TBH they're even more vicious than tesla/spacex-stans....
Also because Sam Altman is involved.
Freedom of speech is irrevocably tied to how information actually spreads in a society. Inhibiting someone from accessing the superhighways of information is effectively suppressing their speech. In practise, if not in pedantic principle.

If you weren’t allowed to drive on the highway, but everywhere else, would your freedom of movement not be suppressed, to some degree?

If in North Korea they’d allow you to say whatever you want as long as you only shouted it from the top of a mountain when alone, or wrote it on a note and buried it in your backyard, would they have freedom of speech?
But instead of from their client, they seek payment from their victim—the company's shareholders, including market indexers such as retirement funds.
To be honest, a lot of end-user problems would go away if they were restricted to a child-proofed version of computers.

In a sense they have been doing that to themselves by not knowing how it works, or how to write code, which already restricts them to things other people made.

They then further restricted themselves by migrating most of their work to mobile devices that run software that only the vendor realistically can be in charge of (mostly due to NDAs for the IP Cores like baseband and SoC, but the amount of kernel patches you get with Android hardware is insane... good luck trying to get a recent kernel for those).

As a result, there are mostly behaviour based problems that remain, most technical problems have disappeared. That is an effect (and limitation) that we cannot deny.
Yet, Ket in central Asia and Navajo in south-central North America are very closely related. Sadly, Ket is close to dead, with only dozens of mostly elderly still fluent. Some suspect it was carried in a migration from Alaska back to Asia.

Languages used in British Columbia and Yukon are in the same family to those, but less similar. It is an example of a common phenomenon, where the extrema of a range retain older features. We see it also in far-west Celt and far-east Tocharian languages. It probably explains how rare genetic features are found in common in isolated South American, Australian, and Indian Ocean refugia, and nowhere between, and in pre-contact eastern US and western Europe haplogroups. Traces between get washed out by later influx.
Fairy tales are funny, aren't they?

The Emperor who gets scammed into buying new clothes which don't exist, is finally called out by a small child who doesn't go along with the fiction. The emperor was naked all along, but nobody wanted to admit it for fear of being ostracized.

Pigs who opt for cheaper quicker building materials like straw and sticks, get eaten. The wolf is a force of nature -- nobody pretends that it's possible to eliminate wolves, they deal realistically with the threat by advocating brick buildings, instead.

Why, then, should imaginary or straw security be any different?
Most of my code has bad asymptomatic bugs but they never show up in testing because the tests don’t have data sets big enough to show the symptoms!
"Free speech" is all about the government not persecuting an individual for something they say.

It offers no protection in a case like this between two non-government entities.
qlot – a project-local library installer for Common Lisp
I believe you may enjoy this, which takes SPC methods and extrapolates from it an entire path to becoming data driven: https://commoncog.com/becoming-data-driven-first-principles/
Thanks for the Tux Paint suggestion, I played a lot with Kid Pix as a kid and it seems that Tux Paint is similar :)

Haven't looked at the PBS shows yet, right now our son has been rather obsessed in a BBC show called Maddie do you know? because it explains how things works and he's excited to see train tracks, helicopters etc... He also really liked Mickey Clubhouse which has the advantage of being translated in Cantonese (my wife's language).
But why is a crypto currency required? Biometrics like Apple’s Face ID reasonably identify the owners of a phone. Why not distribute managed iPhones with access to an account to wire money to or an app that displays a code that aid workers can use to identify that the right person got the goods? That phone or app could be set to only generate one code per aid delivery event and without a code you don’t get aid. Someone having multiple phones would be easy to identify as the aid worker would recognize they are back in line.

I mean if your goal is to end fraud there seems to be several options that don’t require a blockchain or some custom eye scanning device.

How does worldcoin solve the issue of a local abusing a position of power to direct everyone to transfer their funds to their account or with holding some other resource to force people to give them their aid?
Your GDPR rights are portable in theory, in practice the tech companies often silently change your account type once you surface with an US based IP address.
Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39617745
You can also define r as a “quick bang” which means you can just use “r” without !
7 Different Prompting Techniques with Examples
Is cryptocurrency involved? Then yes.

Is blockchain technology involved? Then it's worth a look.
We tried. At first we built it on top of IPFS. It was much too slow. BitTorrent is interesting but we need a way to have mutability (repos change all the time). So we built the networking layer ourselves and the forge on top of that.
We tested Amazon's new shopping chatbot. It's not good.
So Brotli already contains a dictionary that is trained on web traffic. I think the thing here is that Google wants to make sending YouTube 1.1 more efficient if you already have YouTube 1.0, but they can’t put YouTube 1.0 into the browser.
Step 1: Record biometrics from millions of poor people.
Step 2: ???
Step 3: Profit.

It's a bit like the outlandish COVID vaccine conspiracy theories:
Step 1: Vaccinate people and deploy 5G wireless networks.
Step 2: ???
Step 3: Total power over people; world domination.
> Only a trivial one. Which is not really challenged.

"Hard science" still has quite a lot of disagreements in it. The questions you cited had consensus forming quite a long time ago and are trivial now. That does not mean there was no period of consensus forming or that we do not need that consensus forming for actual current scientific questions.

Science is not limited to yesterdays questions.
https://archive.ph/DqjcV
Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39617729
As far as I understand the original source (https://www.aepd.es/prensa-y-comunicacion/notas-de-prensa/la...), Worldcoin has:

- Not provided enough information about how the data is stored/used

- Collected data from minors

- Not offered individuals to withdraw their consent

So the data protection agency of Spain is temporary halting any data processing/transfers, in order to protect people from the unlawful collection.

Is this the first time "Urgency procedure"/Article 66 (https://gdpr-info.eu/art-66-gdpr/) of the GDPR is being used in the wild?
Tell HN: An Airbnb "Booking"
The timeline:

1. Yesterday at 5:31pm I made a reservation on Airbnb for a person and a pet and done the payment

2. At 5:32 I've received a message from the host that in order to be able to check-in I need to provide my personal ID number and my email address. And there will be an additional fee for cleaning up after my pet.

3. At 5:38 I've contacted support, copy pasted the message from the host

4. At 11:22pm, after 4 threads + 1 direct call with different support ambassadors we were nowhere. The support confirmed neither asking for personal details nor asking for an extra fee is supported by Airbnb, but they've just passed me around without any solution. Then I decided not to take the trip and get a refund. Unfortunately the listing I booked had no cancellation, in other words it would refund only the cleaning fee and the taxes, which are less than 10% of what I've paid.

5. Today at 8:54am we've started another support conversation.

6. At 4:42pm the support person contacted the host and they agree I don't have to pay an extra fee for cleaning up after the pet. I said ok, but I'll cancel the trip anyway, and I need a refund if it's possible.

7. At 5:47pm the support person offered to mediate a better refund

8. At 6:12pm I've got finally the answer

"I just wanted to give you an update that I've already had a chance to speak with your Host, your Host has adhered to our standard cancellation policy for your reservation.

I know that this is not the outcome that you expected, XXX. But I am hoping for your understanding that I am only here to explain what's your Host decision. Please do not take it against me."

To sum up:

- The host asked for personal information and extra fee after the payment

- Support confirmed all these actions are prohibited. (There are 3 prohibited actions, these two, and the 3rd, communicating outside Airbnb)

- In 24 hours support negotiated that the extra fee shouldn't be payed

- And offered no refund at all beside the taxes + cleaning fee.
I loved LOGO as a kid, my father was a teacher and he had a robotic LOGO turtle mounted with a pen that could be used to trace on A3 paper. Lot's of fun but that was more around 6 years old or so.