skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thank you and I really appreciate userscripts too. While I'm taking a break from userscripts to make my website on Val Town, I only handled the main problems of my two primary forums. I'm sure I'm going to at least make versions of what I have for my other forums and new userscripts to improve their forum searches.
The framing of Gazans as a whole as "Hamas's people" is at best problematic; Hamas is an accelerationist and revolutionary movement that believes that dead Gazans advance their aims.

Israel seems pretty happy to help Hamas out with proving out their theory right now, but it's important to note that a Gazan could've been born and raised literally to the age of majority without getting a chance to vote on whether they think Hamas is doing right by them.
{} are isomorphic to 'begin' and 'end' in that snippet, though. Part of the reason why early programming languages were comparatively heavy on keywords is that the symbol set was not standardized across machines, so you couldn't count on some symbols being available. It's why C still supports <% %> as digraphs for curly braces, or <: :> for square brackets. Also why languages such as COBOL go as far as supporting syntax like DIVIDE X INTO Y, because the machine character set might not have a slash or divide sign.
On Today's Episode of as the Crypto World Turns: Statement on ShapeShift AG
Health Effects of Fossil Fuel–Derived Endocrine Disruptors
I don't see what that has to do with hamas fighters properly identifying themselves.

However I can't help but feel that it would dramatically lower collateral damage as regular civilians would also know who is a target and who is a civilian.
I sure did, as did most of the devs I worked with. For two reasons: first, that the only time you'd get a pay raise is by changing jobs and second, because lots of employers considered more than 5 years or so at any given job to be a yellow flag (because it's a potential indication that your skills aren't staying up to date.)

Even now, I rarely stay at a given job for more than 5 years or so. But that's mostly because I get bored and want to do something new -- and because my skills get stale and I want to use new ones.
Outside of some big commuter lots, I'm skeptical a lot of people are going to do a lot of multi-mode transport into a city outside of regular commuting. I certainly don't do it. And more pedestrian friendliness wouldn't tempt me to move into a city either.
You’re right, but they didn’t at the time.
We completely agree. We want to develop a series of prebuilt modules for various components (motors, IMUs, star trackers, etc). The goal would be to let people easily test out new configurations quickly by just changing the code. Ideally, this will be a community effort, where people can contribute open-source models of various components that have been created.
>Who is forcing them into 12 hour day jobs? Maybe they think they're 'empowered' but let's face it the country is collapsing so most of their careers aren't going to go anywhere.

>It's still women who still expect men to be high earners, now men have to do half of the housework on top of spending time with children in the evenings then get screamed at for having mediocre finances when their careers flatline.

It sounds like you had a bad experience and are now using that to generalize about a large population of people. Why is it only acceptable for men to seek independence and fulfillment from a career? No one is forcing men into a 12 hour a day job, either. It seems only reasonable that if both partners are working, that they split the household chores and child rearing.

Perhaps it’s the working hours, high cost of living, traditional expectations of women and ultra competitive culture that is collapsing society, and not the women wanting better for themselves. Unless your solution is to rollback the clock several decades or force women into motherhood and domestic labor, I’m not even really sure what your point is here.

The solution that many S. Korean women have found for themselves, in order to have a fulfilling career/not be dependent on a husband, is to remain single and/or childless. Clearly these women are fine living on a single income and cleaning up after themselves, so it’s pretty evident that many women aren’t just after high earnings or that they “still expect men to be high earners.” For women who want a career, they don’t also want to come home and be solely responsible for taking care of their husband and kids. If men want to be in a relationship with these career women, then they need to help out around the house. If they don’t want to do that, then it’s pretty clear that these S. Korean women are completely fine being on their own.

> They didn't interview men because the responses would not fit the narrative that the BBC seeks.

Yeah, it’s an article about South Korean women. Not about S. Korean men. Are you saying that the account of these S. Korean women should be totally discounted because they didn’t interview any men?
rate lowering you say?

"Google changed ad auctions, raising prices 15%, witness says"

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37820192
have you tried Vectara?
How is that at all different from what you could already do with Apple devices?
Aha! Merci.
Totally agree. There is no conspiracy.

Of course, 20 years from now if this is actually true well then we HAD to sell the biometric data at some point because a project of this size needs the funding.

We really had no choice in the matter at Worldcoin. We didn't want to sell the biometric data but we couldn't see any other way to get to UBI.
> Often wondered if that would work at all, but it would have to be secret or if ever found out it would be pilloried for being 'manipulative'.

Why would it have to be secret? All major governments do plenty of manipulation, and it's not even really a secret. The specifics may be a secret, but the fact that they are doing it is just business as usual.
So scams being illegal is paternalistic bullshit I guess?
Our product (phosphor) is built end-to-end in F# so this stuff is close to my heart. You might find Moonbit's approach to functional AI interesting as well https://www.moonbitlang.com/blog/moonbit-ai.
Especially given that you can download your genetic data from 23andme. I am not sure if Worldcoin allows you download a copy of your iris data... no mention in their FAQ, at least.
This might be a naive question, but rather than targeting WASM directly, why not target MLIR (used by projects like Mojo) and use LLVM to compile to WASM?
Only if you don’t use multistage builds
Flux Copilot: Mapping Electronics Block Diagrams to Parts and Schematics
I think people generally like driving cars. They just hate traffic.
Latin Wordle
Epic is privately owned with Tim Sweeney having a majority. One man's whim is a lot more dynamic than a mass of public shareholders' expectations.
assume it's worth zero

sadly, founders who are hiring don't want to hear that and typically don't want to compensate fairly for the high probability that their precious offering of equity is worth zero
Samsung is making it harder to know what type of OLED TV you're getting
Except for the common VPN setup.

Now, perhaps this is what it takes to put paid to IPV4...
Everything Is a Perp
It's worth mentioning that in Canada, you do not require a prescription to get a CGM. However only the Abbot Freestyle Libre series is available here.
It cost ~$100 and last 2 weeks.

I've found it to be mostly accurate.

Placing it on the back of the arm was always a problem for me, it was constantly getting knocked/pulled, and otherwise disturbed. I had to buy adhesive patches that covered the entire unit. I later discovered that another decent place to apply them in on my chest between my collar-bone and shoulder-joint but lower (towards the nipple). I always had decent reliability/accuracy there. It also hurt less (from the adhesive) then on the back of the arm.

Having a CGM is amazing, and if you have medical coverage that will pay for it then you should get it.
Using smart pointers solves some problems, sure, but it does not make C++ memory safe.
> Another possibility is that they also had a second job working for Hamas - so, on a list of "not really journalists".

I think we need less baseless speculation in this discussion. Another commenter posted links to the Times of Israel, which of course is very imperfect, but it's a start.
Kids are fickle and run with trends though. Apple has a good foothold, for sure, but banking on teenagers to carry your banner is an idea that would have me sweating.

Older people tend to care much less about what phone they have, and care much less about upgrading.
For a while Apple existed for Steve to make products he’s proud of.

I have a very deep resentment for the App Store, because that was a turning point towards controlling the platform, and start of a feudal relationship with developers.

They’ve went from (half-assed) open source efforts to outright banning GPL completely. They’ve went from trying to use open protocols to putting DRM throughout entire stack on everything they could.

Apple has been high margin company with expensive products, but arguably worth the cost if you appreciated their style and attention to detail. But the OS and services side has shifted to just extracting as much money as they can, because they can. Their 27% cut on purchases made outside of iOS is just pure greed and spite.
> If we can change the rules of a discussion midway through, everyone loses.

Then we lost repeatedly at almost every other step back to the root, because it switched between those two loads of times.

The change to LLMs was itself one such shift.

> No, that doesn't mean "LLMs can generate images" aside from triggering some thing to happen

The aside is important.

> It's not pedantic or unreasonable to divide the two.

It is unreasonable on the question of "guardrails, good or bad?"

It is unreasonable on the question of "can it cause harm?"

It's not unreasonable if you are building one.

> If y'all want to rant and fear monger about any AI technology, including tech that has existed for years (deepfakes existed well before LLMs were mainstream)

And caused problems for years.

> That said, arguing with you people is pointless. You don't even seem to think.

Communication isn't a single-player game, I can't make you understand something you're actively unwilling to accept, like the idea that tools enable people to do more, for good and ill, and AI is such a tool.

Perhaps you should spend less time insulting people on the internet you don't understand. Go for a walk or something. Eat a Snickers, take a nap. Come back when you're less cranky.
Israel would and has claimed otherwise.

Maybe you don't believe them, but if the goal is to determine truth its probably better to start from a place of assuming innocence and change views based on evidence, not the other way around.
One thing that does make it kind of weird is that a lot of statically typed languages that aren't from the ML family have a grammar top level that isn't imperative. In C#, Java, Dart, etc. The top level of a source file is purely declarative.

That can make a REPL sort of semantically weird. Do you allow variable declarations? If so, are they local or global? Do you allow class declarations in them? If so, can they access previous declarations?

All of that's easier in a dynamically typed language where the top level of a program is more or less just regular imperative code.

It's not insurmountable though, because you can be a little hand-wavey about semantics in a REPL if needed.
You should also be able to do that with Cosmopolitan/APE.
> Hamas (elected government of Palestine)

My understanding is that Hamas candidates won a plurality of seats in an election in 2006, then Hamas essentially started a civil war in which it rejected the legitimacy of Fatah (and, by extension, the internationally-recognized leadership of the Palestinian Authority) and seized control of the Gaza Strip for itself. It does not rule the West Bank, where the majority of Palestinians live. I would not describe that as the "elected government of Palestine". Am I misunderstanding something?
Criticize Apple vigorously and criticize Epic vigorously. Epic's been fined for dark patterns, data collection on minors below 13, and their entire business model relies on getting children to buy worthless cosmetic skins out of peer pressure, while optimizing for engagement and addiction. It's a predatory business model that should be illegal.

One of their main goals in bypassing IAP is to make these microtransactions non-refundable, so parents are screwed. They're the great satan.
The law applies to Apple’s presence in the EU. The EU could order Apple’s EU branch to allow anyone to install an App Store. In the sense that sovereign states can write their laws however they want.

Looking into it, they use the phrase “end user” a lot, but don’t seem to specify resident, citizen, or anything, at least as far as I see. It is a complicated law so I probably missed it.

People here seem really confident about who’s covered, but nobody is providing links, so I think everybody is just going off vibes.
https://regex101.com/ is good
This is more of a technical problem. If your update either breaks something or leaves gaping security holes, then there is no good solution. I think I would rather inconvenience a customer by turning off functionality than leave a bad vulnerability unpatched, but delay an update if it is not security related.
Interesting you bring this up. We saw something similar happen at another FAANG where the fake review detection mechanisms that had worked so well were suddenly removed from the codebase, among other quality control safeguards.
Yeah it's a great point. In some ways here we are seeing the exact illustration of that point. If they only cared about user experience and quality they wouldn't sacrifice their user's interests by forcing them through convoluted processes to buy content outside their own store. That's far from a high quality experience. So they value quality highly but it's a distant second to their own desire for control. They still present a very thin veil of pretending this is in their user's interests, but they are barely trying any more.
Can you give the elevator pitch on why someone should get one?
he is a salesman selling midly working snake oil, he was into nft a few year ago and jumped to the new snake oil. everything that elon is claiming now is real. they manipulated opinion and rode open source to train on public open data sources and once they had something they could,market they closed everything. its not up;for debate that is a fact
Google engineer indicted for stealing AI secrets to aid Chinese companies
not quite. sunk cost implies that the cost, despite not creating any returns, is to high to throw it away.

sure, if i have no job, and i am broke, then almost anything else will do. however, switching into a new line of work is only feasible if it does not require years before i can earn enough to feed my family. as long as there is a chance at finding a job with my current skills, that pays enough, taking on such a risk doesn't make sense, unless i can actually afford doing so. in any other case my energy is better spent looking for jobs doing what i already know, where i can earn enough.
That's sad to hear - "Red vs. Blue" really helped to popularize fan machinima - I still recall newspaper articles about US soldiers stuck in Iraq comparing themselves to the RvB characters stuck in Blood Gulch. The series was even popular enough for its voice actors to make it back into the original Halo franchise that it was based off of.

I'm amazed to hear that RvB made it ~20 years; what a run!
AWS internally has a very strong allergy to raising prices. If anything there is generally pressure to reduce prices.
> It's also rare for a doctor to tell a person they are too fat and to lose weight.

I don't think this is true. Doctors do tell patients if they are overweight, and they do encourage them to make lifestyle changes including losing weight.
Sorry dang, but it’s a genocide. And this site continually allows people to post propaganda uncritically and deny or justify that the genocide is happening.

Pretty much all my posts are replies to those people. I’d rather not have to post about it so much, but it’s clear this site and its methods of moderation are not equipped to handle such an important topic.

Anywho, I’ll refrain from single topic posting. Can you give me the accepted posting ratio for tech to divisive topics? Thanks.
ppm sounds kind of the wrong thing to consider here. Like my intuition says it's the absolute amount rather than the relative abundance. It was a long time ago that I had acne but I remember with some of those creams you just needed a tiny amount. With sunscreen on the other hand, you need quite a lot since you are covering your whole body. Though if you just use it for your two week vacation it may not be a huge deal compared to the guy that is living in a sunny place and using it half the year.
> What I keep wondering is why iSheeps don’t complain

Because the costs and detriments are obscured, dispersed, and nebulous. The consumers here are largely boiled frogs who don't know what they're missing. If users were used to an open system; an app store that functioned as an intuitive frontend for multiple distribution channels, a messaging app that supported all the protocols their friends and family use and seamlessly joined their conversations, a social media app that aggregated all the content from the people in their lives and creators they follow, and documents/photos/etc that sync across all of their devices. And then Apple et al took that all away; now you can only have apps we approve of, now all of your chats are split between platform apps with UIs that compete for your attention and try to upsell you features, now you have to use the Twitter app to read tweets (and see our ads), Instagram to see your friends' posts their (and our ads), YouTube to see new videos (and our ads), Twitch to watch people live (and our ads), oh, and also now all of your photos only sync to some of your other devices (the ones we sold you). Then you'd see outrage and indignation. iSheep don't know what is being kept from them, don't understand how cohesive and empowering a digital interface to the world should be. They have been trained not to expect a User Agent, but instead an appliance that allows them access to little islands and digital fiefdoms. And it isn't just Apple device users that are subjected to this. Apple is the most rigid in licking down their computers, but all major platforms add friction and roadblocks meant to discourage users from owning and tailoring their systems.
That whole generation of politicians, who stirred that 30 year disaster after the fall of the wall, thinking imperialism was a thing of the past, should step back from all posts in lockstep.
No, it's a game about CSS
I agree. In Ukraine, combatants are not fighting from within an overpopulated prison camp.
Everything around me seem to get announced on meetup.com and the local tech/startup Slack group. There is quite a bit of overlap between the two.
Thank you. I'm happy to provoke nostalgia.
> But go ahead and use the FFI and things aren't so rosy. Usually the GC can cooperate with allocated memory from the other side of the FFI, but this requires care and attention to detail, or you get memory bugs, and just like that, you're manually managing memory in a garbage collected language, and you can segfault on a use-after-free just like a Real Programmer.

Now you’ve stepped beyond the walled gardens of the managed memory. How is that an abstraction leak?

> It's also quite plausible to write a program in a GC language which leaks memory, by accidentally retaining a reference to something which you thought you'd deleted the last reference to.

That the user just thought they had gotten rid of? If the memory is technically reachable then that doesn’t sound like its fault. I’m reminded of the recent Rust Vec thread on how the so-called space leak of reusing allocated memory lead to unreasonable memory consumption. But to my recollection that wasn’t a leak in the sense of unreachable-but-not-freed. I do agree however (with those that made this point) that the Vec behavior was too clever. Which goes to show that Vec should probably just stick to the front-page abstraction advertised: will amortize allocations, can shrink to fit if you tell it to, nothing much more fancy beyond that.

(The memory leak topic seems very fuzzy in general.)
This a common misunderstanding of the international laws of war, and international law in general.

In our personal lives the government can compel us to follow the law with the threat of overwhelming force; if I break the law I will be arrested, and regardless of how much I fight back I will not be able to stop it. Laws in our everyday lives are like commands from a parent to a child; the government, as the parent, can and will compel the child's obedience.

International law is different. If a state breaks international law, there is no entity willing or capable of using overwhelming force to compel obedience. States have armies and some have nuclear weapons; the amount of force required to compel a state to behave a certain way is huge, and generating that force is extremely costly. When states break international law there are consequences, but at the end of the day violence is generally not on the table.

Effective international law is a balancing act. An international standard of warfare that placed extremely strict standards on when it was permissible to kill civilians would make fighting a war significantly harder. No state would obey such a law because winning the war is the absolute highest priority, making the law worthless. Instead, laws of war try to outlaw actions that don't affect the ability of a country to win a war. No chemical or biological weapons (high explosives are more effective), humane treatment of prisoners (discourages the enemy fighting to the death), and no killing civilians unless in the pursuit of a military objective (if it's not in pursuit of a military objective, then it's a waste of resources). The goal of the laws of war is to prevent unnecessary violence, not prevent violence altogether. It's a case of "perfect is the enemy of good."
Related:

Linkers and Loaders (1999) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18424233 - Nov 2018 (26 comments)

Linkers and Loaders - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=828638 - Sept 2009 (3 comments)
That's just the opposite kind of naive. Companies are still for the most part run by CEOs, and many of those CEOs have tremendous egos and most of them have a tremendous ability to direct the actions of those companies. Look at Tesla and Twitter lawsuits- they're clearly in Musks's interests.

Companies aren't minds of their own directing their own actions. Tim cook or some other high level executive is deciding these actions. Stop abrogating the direction of the literal directors
Goebbels was literally the Minister of Propaganda lol
It's interesting that you mention Ruby, because Ruby is another language that just fits the shape of my brain for some reason.

I've always really struggled with the various Lisp variants.
Apple used to bring Epic games on stage during it presentations.

That seems to be the full extent of their collaboration. No specific deals, no specific adjustments, just having them at PR events and nothing more.

The weirdest thing to me is they couldn't even come up with a deal with Microsoft and the Xbox streaming app when historically MS saved Apple's bacon at the most crucial time.
It's worded to imply that second sentence is linked to the first, but based on other comments here (about game design not being copyrightable) it looks like an attempt to mislead.