skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Just for understanding, what exactly does your use of “the right people” mean, and who is it referring to?

This article didn’t mention DEI.

It mentioned 10 out of 250 people being affected.

There is a reference to AI so maybe heads are rolling from the issues with Gemini.

https://archive.is/UL4VO

Again, not sure what “the right people” means.

Are you sure such comments aren’t an axe looking for a stone to grind against?
It might be usable but the cost difference of 8/256 and 16/512 is negligible. But Apple wants to price gouge you if you want the latter. Computing hardware was always about providing the maximum upfront to give headroom in the future.
what is shared mode ? this is by fact optimization for speed, if we need read-only access to data, we allow to system let another thread into the section that requests shared access also

allow but NOT DEMAND this. If one thread has acquired the shared lock , other thread can acquire the shared lock too. but only CAN. in some case system not let another thread enter to lock, despite it also request share access. one case: if another rthread request exclusive acess - he begin wait and after this - any thread which acquire even shared access to lock - also begin wait

If lock_shared is called by a thread that already owns the mutex in any mode (exclusive or shared), the behavior is undefined.

and

Shared mode SRW locks should not be acquired recursively as this can lead to deadlocks when combined with exclusive acquisition.

why is this ? because if between 2 calls to lock_shared ( AcquireSRWLockShared ) another thread call AcquireSRWLockExclusive - the second call is block.

the code in example make assumption that ALL threads can enter to lock at once. that if one thread enter to lock in shared mode, another thread also ALWAYS can enter to lock in shared mode (if no exclusive requests). but i not view clear formalization of such requirement. and we must not based on this.

i be will add next rule:

thread inside lock must not wait on another thread to enter this lock

this is obvivius for exlusive access, but not obvivous to shared. but must be cleare stated along with the recursive rule ( should not be acquired recursively as this can lead to deadlocks, even in shared mode)
Also Daniel Ek's X response (although it basically follows the same talking points as the newsroom response): https://x.com/eldsjal/status/1764665330444406894
Classic Snake in Direct WebAssembly Text
All of the game graphics, state and logic are written in WebAssembly Text. The host environment (Javascript) is responsible for:

Game tick loop

User input

Providing characters "0123456789GAMEOVER" byte data on game startup

Blitting the pixel buffer to the display with WebGL2

The game uses 3 virtual pages of memory (64kb each) for a total of 192kb. Within those exist the pixel buffer contents, the characters data and snake positions. For more detailed breakdown you can check src/snake.wat.

The memory is shared between WASM and JS. On each game tick, the pixel buffer region of the memory is transferred to a WebGL2 texture, uploaded to the GPU and blitted to the screen.

For more info you can refer to the repo - https://github.com/gnikoloff/wasm-snake
Probably Alexandra hope too much that Delhi court will score sci-hub a win that makr it legal in India. That would be a precedent that she aims to be imitated in other places. She is still complying with the request of the court to stop uploading new papers.
> That's not the case for greenhouse gases

It certainly is, especially for SLCPs.

That long debate aside, today we can see the palpable smog in big cities vs the clean air in rural areas, small towns, and small cities.

You also risk ozone depletion in areas with concentrated aerosol emissions, these are short lived and would disperse, but they cause the most damage of all pollutants in concentration.

> The earth could likely only support a fraction of the current human population if they all lived rural lifestyles.

I'm not suggesting that, I'm suggesting people live where they want to and don't fall for that inaccurate guilt-trip talking point.
I tend to agree with the parent: if it is legitimate to take copyrighted code, pass it through an LLM, output it in a new text file, and say "it doesn't have any copyright anymore because it was generated by an LLM", then copyright is essentially dead as a concept.

If copyright is dead, then no need for licenses anymore: anyway people can remove your copyright by laundering your code through an LLM.
Depends on how you measure 'positive for society'. Some might count people not feeling so bad they're killing themselves in that column.
Why would you use ML to develop well understood formulas from first principle, if you can also have a properly developed program for the same purpose?
Are you aware you're using GPT-3 or weaker in those chats? The green icon indicates that you're using the first generation of ChatGPT models, and it is likely to be GPT-3.5 Turbo. I'm unsure but it's possible that it's an even further distilled or quantized optimization than is available via API.

Using GPT-4, I get the result I think you'd expect: https://chat.openai.com/share/da15f295-9c65-4aaf-9523-601bf4...

This is a good PSA that a lot of content out on the internet showing ChatGPT getting things wrong is the weaker model.

Green background OpenAI icon: GPT 3.5

Black or purple icon: GPT 4

GPT-4 Turbo, via API, did slightly better though perhaps just because it has more Drizzle knowledge in the training set, and skips the SQL command and instead suggests modifying only db.ts and page.tsx.
This thread shows pretty clearly who the emotionally imbalanced party is.
Many businesses trying to hire these days would take issue with your "unlimited supply of workers".
It should take 1 or 2 months to get the money, it's nearly automatic even if the loser want to go again to "cours de cassation" (french 2nd circuit).
You can always find research that supports a contrary finding in economics. Economics is black magic.
I think in the old, old days you'd do a batch job. So you'd connect, then upload/download at whatever baud speed was accepted. Your modem would only connect for x amount of minutes.

Later, more 'always on' was possible. In the US, the phone system was setup in a way that local calls, defined by geographic rings based on switching stations, were 0 cents a minute after the initial first minute. So that allowed things like BBS culture to thrive.
have you seen the guy's house?

I don't think another $6 million would mean much to him
Some places yes. It's a little different, at least it has been in all my contracts. The company you work for has the rights to buy the software from you, at a reasonable price. If they don't want it, you free to do whatever. They can't just take it.

I had colleagues would worked on a project in their space time, their price was reasonable wanting only compensation for the hours spend working on. The company didn't want it, but they also could not sell it, because if was so heavily tied into our systems and work flows that they couldn't reasonably sell it anywhere else.

One of those developers then started working on another project, one that was so fare away from what we did that there was no way the company would want it and turned that project into a very successful business.

In reality what happens is that people will work on something, quit, and the spend a few months on polishing and then release their project or sell it. Very few companies will want to spend time going after a former employee building some side business far removed from their core business.
There is no explicit limit on the role of the supreme court. Nor is there any actual explicit role in the constitution for it. It's just one sentence. I think they even once tried a criminal case.

It deals with lots of constitutional issues, but Congress could basically just defund it and remit constitutional complaints to other venues if they wanted to. This is done in part with FISA and other national security measures. Congress deemed there to be no venue in the courts for a complaint.
> Many European and all Canadian airports do

Despite shoes not needing to be routinely removed at most (all?) European airports' security checkpoints?
> Ahh, yes the marxist slight of hand to turn compounding on foregone consumption into something evil rather than something that should be applauded and appreciated.

What's the foregone consumption on 1 Billion+ dollars of inheritance? These are sums that outstrip anything but the most conspicuous consumption. An individual who inherited such a sum could live with such consumption their entire lifetime.

>antitrust being used too effectively pre renquist supreme court and there's no reason we can't get back that direction.

This is likely a prime reason for US resilience to political instability. Recent moves have been to print money to make up for the short-falls induced by wealth concentrating at the top. However this only works provided that the folks to which wealth is concentrating fail to spend the wealth.
> This includes the current US president, who signed a bunch of executive orders right after taking office that increased gas prices by restricting fossil fuel production.

I'm sorry, what?

https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/19/business/us-production-oil-re...
I think there's a logical explanation for this. Low skill jobs tend to have an oversupply of labor, relative to demand, so wages are going to hover around the cost of basic living. But as that cost of basic living skyrockets, wages are going to be naturally pushed up - simply because workers cannot afford to work for less.

But for higher wage earners basic cost of living expenses (food/energy/rent/etc) make up a smaller percent of their overall income, and so they are relatively less affected. And if they don't aggressively demand their pay keep up with inflation then their relative rate of gain will naturally fall behind.
The bourgois, whom would have to fight among themselves to determine who will dominate, and who will be dominated.

Or they would have to resort do massive immigration, destroying culturally their own country in the process, and laying the path to being replaced in the long run.

None of this path is good for them.
Ofc the human visual system does not work at discrete frames.

However, there is a threshold on how much information your brain can process and tests indicate this maxes out at the temporal detail you can fit into 60 'discrete' frames per sec. For many people it is actually much less.

That is: in general.

Specifically this threshold is differs based on certain variables; the most important one being available light (number of photons per unit of time).

I.e. the less light, the more motion blur there is because there is more temporal integration happening in your brain's visual system. Estimates say your brain goes down to a temporal information density of less than 10 FPS in very low light circumstances [1].

Your brain does perceive motion blurred frames differently. How do I know? I worked in VFX on many blockbuster movies. We do preview stuff using realtime graphics (aka what game engines do) w/o motion blur at equal frame rates as the final frames (which are with motion blur, ofc).

Even on projects where we used 60 fps there is visible strobing w/o motion blur. And as I said: even when you preview stuff at 120 fps or more there is visible strobing with geometry that covers big distances in your FOV.

Motion from game engines w/o motion blur does not least look like game engines because of this. There is also a night and day difference between post-process motion blur, based on 'smearing' the image based on a motion vector pass and true 3D motion blur.

"The Hobbit" triology was done at 60FPS. But it still had motion blur, for obvious reasons.

[1] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004269890...

EDIT: typos/grammar
You may be the only one. I wish the vendors I deal with spent even a nanosecond thinking about leaving stuff like that around. (Let alone multi-gigabyte copies of production databases, long-since obsoleted patches, etc.)
IP geolocation works surprisingly well for most people. It'll be a better default than any fixed location.
this map misses large scale organized predation and murder that were rampant in many places.
You’ve pointed out one instance of this occurring in the past. This doesn’t dispel the essence of the point you are responding to. You need to show that it was widespread and occurred in most media outlets.
> Sure, I will buy another phone and all the apps I paid for in 15 years of usage. It's very trivial and simple.

I know you're being sarcastic, but it is extremely trivial and simple to buy another phone. Because you can also keep the phone you have!

There is a hang-up among hackers that think it is impossible to use different phones, different computers and different browsers. You can have one phone for this and another for that. You can use both vim and emacs to edit a document and you can have several computers with different systems. Hell, you can even have different sets of cutlery at your home.

> No, they can't.

They sure can. Being incompetent or lacking in capabilities is an acceptable excuse for a person, not for a billion dollar company like Spotify. I have here on my desk a pocket music player of excellent quality that was manufactured in 2023. It is not Android nor iOS and the company making it is much smaller than Spotify. So why can't they? "Not our business"? If they're that incompetent, the CEO and the leadership should apologise for being failures, step down, pay back to shareholders all salary they have received and go hide away.

Yes there is free will for sellers to not put their products on Amazon. That's called retail, and it's a tough market. If your product is good enough you can sell it without putting it on a third-party marketplace. Just like with hotel aggregator websites and food delivery apps. Companies are doing fine without being there.

> There's only 1 competitor in the market: Android

There's thousands of different Android phones in the market, that's the competition. And it's not that difficult for a tech company to develop their own mobile OS if they'd like. Microsoft made Windows Phone which many people liked, Nokia made the excellent and ahead of its time Meego OS, BlackBerry 10 OS was excellent as well. And there is absolutely no blame on Apple for these tech giants discontinuing their OSes. They were discontinued because they weren't profitable enough for the owners taste. So now Apple should be forced to make sure that their competitors can make a profit from their customers? Because that's the core of the matter. Other companies do not want to do the work and investments that Apple did to get a loyal customer base willing to spend money, so they're using EU regulators to freeload.

No sympathy to any of them. Make better ecosystems if you want to compete, you have the money and the means. Try giving a fuck about your customers and your business. That's something that the general public and consumers also would benefit from.
I love my m2 mbp 14"

Frankly, Apple is an amazing organization and I am extremely thankful that they've empowered product designers to bring us these amazing creations.

Apple is one reason that I love existing in this era. Sure, there are others. But having Apple... enables me to bring a laptop + a backup battery (anker 737) practically anywhere and work all day without needing a direct electricity connection.

Laptop + Phone + external battery packs = work all day

The light weight, stay-cool-ness ... makes it so easy to work from.

I love you Apple. So glad to not have to use Windows. Sure, Linux desktops distros are decent (despite bugs), but Apple "just works".
I am thinking hard about any use case for mortals (so not pro gamers, not folks running some automated trading from their home or whatever corner case there is) that can't be covered by latest wifi. Even with all the interference everybody talks about yet I struggle to see it happening for us. And there is always next version just behind the corner, ie v7 looks very nice on paper.

I go the opposite direction, will eventually rip out/cover all the network cable outlets previous owner put in in various rooms.
Bare metal or on linux?
I see, thanks. But is Velato actually conceived to create music, or is the music just a "random" byproduct?
Depending on your use cases the software environment for the mac has never been worse right as the hardware has gotten so powerful and cool running. Major mac devs have totally abandoned the platform in recent years. Apple needs to rebuild good faith among developers especially game developers, or at the very least get ahead of the software drain and put and end to what factors have been causing it.
I did most of it. Can recommend.

Very nice intro, no fanaticism, great teaching, good pacing. Pretty much perfect for a beginner.

Among the best ways to get into functional programming.

I found it a bit slow for myself. But great content, no doubt.
EEE is still very much alive nowadays, especially how they got into Linux spaces with WSL(2) and into the wider FLOSS community with the GitHub acquisition. We're just in the Extend phase at the moment.
To clarify - you were able to run the FIR filter on the codec chip because the main CPU didn't have enough <somthing - clock rate?> to handle the 48kHz input?

Nifty story, just wanted to validate my understanding.
Security is important. Overusing report mechanisms for non-actionable noise is counterproductive.
I don't really agree; the training mission can contribute to stabilize the situation. It raises the incentives to not change the status quo, for both sides, since contrary to most past US interventions, escalating this issue will hurt US interests as well. Even if one side prevails without large-scale destruction, the economic impact would be severe for both sides.

Apart from that, the training mission could be recalled just as quickly again. Curious about what's gonna happen after the next election.
I agree with you here. Your example is an abuse scenario. In that case the hurt is the point, there isn't really meaning to it, and it really sucks that it happened to you.

The thing that gives me such a bad vibe from the OP is that this type of behavior is presented as normal in a listening scenario to such an extent that learning to dismiss it is a core listening skill. I think she was either abusive towards the people she expected to listen to her, or the BPD/NPD hypersensitivity to criticism caused her to habitually mistake feedback and boundary setting as cruel and hateful attacks.

Either way, the model of human relationships presented in the OP is completely dysfunctional. It deeply pains me to see it presented as advice.
Probably not data so much as growth numbers to appease investors. Such offerings typically don’t last forever. Might as well take advantage while it lasts.
> The findings in Göbleki Tepe proves that you don't need a massive agricultural civilization to create impressive stone works.

Is this definitive? Couldn’t it be evidence that the people that built it might have had massive agriculture that we haven’t found yet?
> I'm just gonna sit here and worry about everything that needs to be done!

Do literally anything besides that.
> I've found very few projects where a bit of poking can't turn up memory safety issues.

I'm working on a Rust project right now, and I'm probably one of those people who are overestimating the correctness of my code! I would love to know about what sorts of memory safety issues you often uncover.
Air has no fan which means no moving parts and no noise.
It's funny how this topic seems to make people's brains and reading comprehension just switch off.
> It's not America's position to declare Taiwan an independent country or not.

That sounds weird. Why should the US not be able to declare that they (the US) consider Taiwan an independent country?

The US isn't the UN, which seems like the more "correct" body to give such a declaration wide ranging meaning.
Most upcoming Arrow Lake CPUs to use TSMC nodes, Intel 20A only for i5 and lower
It's still a huge route but it's also something you can do on a day flight. Heck, from Boston, I can fly to EWR and still be in London for a late dinner. I don't even need a lie-flat seat.

The extra $4K or so in your pocket pays for a lot of reduced comfort for 10 or so hours.
Links says "Gleam compiles to either Erlang or JavaScript" which I didn't realize. Neat!
The garage will have a home office and TV area, so I need some kind of network connection. I was planning to use a wireless bridge, but it seems like it might be worth adding a run of fiber.
It would be like Russia bombing the Ukraine.
The 14 inch is already so light imo its probably worth it to splurge just to get things like the non gimped screen
> We only have KVM virtualization on x86 today because Citrix meticulously developed an x86 instruction emulator (many thousand lines of dense code).

> ...Linux’s copy but can do so from Xen —- even though it is the exact same code!!

Do you have any references for this? I went looking, but couldn't find anything to support your assertions. Neither code re-use/re-licensing nor origin at Citrix.

Origin at Citrix appears especially dubious, as KVM was present in linux kernel version 2.6.20, released almost a year before Citrix acquired Xensource. Also, Xen was originally developed at Cambridge University.

The only thing I thought both projects shared was their use of Fabrice Bellard's GPLv2 licensed qemu (some parts of qemu are under other licenses, but the main project is GPLv2).
Something does not need to be illegal for it to be unacceptable at the time
it's a nice sentiment, but puts a target on your back for layoffs and other unintended consequences
https://intelligenceexplosion.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12...
The claim I addressed was "Firefox has never reversed a browser monopoly" (paraphrased - the original comment had much more derision and snark).

Obviously the person who made this comment was unaware of Firefox single handedly kickstarting the new browser wars (and the removal of IE as the only option).

I made no comment about what came later.
Use DOIs, they said. URLs are just transient, they said. But DOIs are permanent, they said.

Could it be that the whole DOI system was just a ruse by the commercial academic publishers to re-intermediate themselves between academic authors and readers in the age of the WWW?
I feel like motion blur should be used like mouse acceleration. Like you said: If I whip my head around quickly that image should present clearly and immediately. However, if I'm in a car or flying through the air (in a game) this may distort the image as I'm glancing. This is the kind of drag-as-you-accelerate blur I'm expecting, and it can really make a fast-paced moment look that much more exciting. Motion blur is poorly executed everywhere.
Hmm... even though they're all above historical averages right now, it looks like they're only about 79% full (mean of the capacities in the graphic). Unless they get sustained high precipitation over several years, the reservoirs might not reach capacity.

If they build more reservoirs but the rains don't keep up, a lot of it would still be lost to evaporation.
Yeah I have no idea what they are referencing either. Ice sheets are called as such because they sit on top of the continents. Apparently North America was actually compressed downwards by the last sheet and is still basically rising back up.

Maybe they are thinking of permafrost or something? I'm not sure how deep that gets at the Northern reaches like Svalbard. But most of the land on earth is not permafrost for a long time now.
Are you able to share any demonstration pics using your custom lens? Certainly a creative fun project.