skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It was this one:

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0CJNND118/

Super generic design. Probably the exact same circuit board/chips as a dozen other similar switches you can find on Amazon.
16GB on 4GB machine Challenge.
> The degree to which Apple has kinda just “won” laptops is nuts to me.

It's nuts that the entire rest of the industry basically has own-goaled Apple into a dominant position. Apple's playbook:

1. Model-year build stability over faster go-to-market on new components.
2. Better build quality.
3. Better battery life.
4. Better display, especially in value models.

I'm leaving OS and UI out of the discussion.
>so if most of the increase in prices is accruing to labor, real wages will be positive, while if most accrues to capital, real wages will be negative.

I am not asking this to be snarky, but do you recall any time in our lives where increase in prices mostly accrued to labor?
RIP Yuzu
Which would actually make a lot of sense, now that I think about it...
Too bad it's completely closed source and MS Windows only.
I have been making these generators for my workplace, so the project scope is very narrow. You can follow the idea with any dimensions you need.

If you want to use these techniques on a global site, I think you could use multiple @page styles and switch between them with a dropdown like I did with portrait/landscape. Although A4 and letter are very close in size.
It's kind of funny that I can't access the main Claude.AI web interface as my country(Pakistan) is not in the list but they are giving away API Access to me
South Korea to Start Steps to Punish Protesting Doctors Who Walked Out on Job
Many who study Japanese, probably prefer the current official system. It more closely reflects Japanese kana spellings. There are multiple ways of writing syllables like "ji" in Japanese and that's why there are multiple ways of writing it in nihonshiki romanization. There are variants of Hepburn that have the same property, but few actually write it strictly - even long vowel sounds may not be shown.

Reminds me of Mandarin romanization. Pinyin is quite logical for Mandarin speakers, and students studying the language, but misleading if you just approach it assuming English sound values. The system more closely adapted to English (Wade-Giles romanization) as actually used (no one bothers with all those apostrophes) effectively ignores a bunch of important distinctions in Mandarin.

In practice, romanization is trying to achieve two separate goals. The two goals are mutually incompatible, or at least largely work against each other.

One goal is to accurately transliterate the language according to its own internal logic. It might mirror aspects of the language's writing system, carefully distinguish between all possible sounds in that language, and it might use morphemes as the language's speakers think about them. For example, a hypothetical romanization of English might always use the letter z to write plurals, even though the actual sound varies from z ~ s depending on environment. This regularity is useful for learners of the language, for academic study, and so on.

The other goal is to make it pronounceable to someone who doesn't speak the language in question. When done for a linguistic audience, this is universally done with the International Phonetic Alphabet. But there is no commonly agreed upon way of representing any other language's sounds in English spelling. And so people end up using transliteration systems - often really complicated ones intended for specialist use - when what they really want is a simplified phonetic transcription, something that tells you how to approximately pronounce the word.
I think almost everything useful and practical has made it into oo and modern languages already though or became best practice for writing in other languages.

I don't even really write very stateful or object oriented python anymore, and idk if anyone would really recommend that? That's been my experience though.
That's not quite true AFAIK at least a couple of years ago the super long routes (18+h) were served in business class only because not enough customers wanted to do such a long flight in economy.
An an EU resident, I agree. Every country should protect consumer rights, have oversight over corporations operating in their jurisdiction, and enforce anti-trust laws to ensure a functioning free market.

Your problem seems to be that you see this as the EU doing something "to" Apple (for fun or whatever nefarious reasons you think they have), rather than the EU just doing their job in protecting its citizens against an economic aggressor.

Your framing of this is actually kind of sad. This isn't an EU vs US issue, but citizens united against the evils of the dark side of capitalism.
It's LGPL. If they kept to the existing interfaces they wouldn't need to, but honestly they aren't great. For someone like MS it's probably easier to buy either 7zip or WinRar out than to assure license conformity for the coming decades.
It’s just a placeholder…
I thought his long interview with David Cutler was excellent: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xi1Lq79mLeE
My read is that the computational dynamics involved in a microstate cause it to map into a stable macrostate over time. Proving that the microstates map to the macrostates is the real trick. This implies the microscopic level is computing the state of information on the macroscopic level. It seems like 'strong lumpability' means the microstate mappings are equivalent to a macrostate, so we can safely infer the dynamics of a system based on the macrostate without having to compute from the microstate.
We didn't "Surf the Internet", we surfed the Information
Superhighway. Before that we "browsed" like ruminants, consuming
slowly with very strong stomachs, and sometimes regurgitating. Then
we got caught in the "Web". Time's fun when you're having flies, as
the spider joked.
Even in 1959, the US labor force participation rate for women was 37%. So since that time, there’s only been about a twenty point increase.

Most people were poor, and married, and with children, so that would make sense if the real issue was underrepresentation in some upper class jobs.
In the late 2000s I worked at a lab that used subversion, which I also found annoying after getting used to git. My hack was to use git-svn - it let you locally use git, and eventually sync your work back to svn. Worked like a charm. The rest of the lab soon got sold on git afterwards, though.
roughly speaking, they considered it unethical
At $700, you'll out-spec the mac on RAM and GPU but get a potato grade 1080p display.
Interesting - I had this exact question and tried the search on the website to find the answer with no result :D

Would be great to have an FAQ for this type of common question
There is a nuanced, but important point to make here regarding responsibility.

One of resources I watched (a therapist) described therapy as 90% active listening. It's important to be aware of that proportion and the tendency of people to really open up when someone is truly listening.

For example, I was at a bar talking to a stranger when they had to take a break. They were on the brink of tears because they were talking about something that was so deeply meaningful to them[1]. I missed the flag and will always think back to my responsibility - just to pick up on those signs and ask the person if they're doing ok. There's a vulnerability index which I like to reference that conceptualizes some of this.

The difference between open inquiry and probing/drilling is an important distinction to keep in mind when listening too. Laying some of these skills on too thickly can come across as more of an interview than a conversation.

1. Palestine
Memory bandwidth doesn't matter for these types of devices, it is memory latency that matters. But best of all is actually having your application in memory and not having to do disk reads.
"I wanted something that expressed the fun I had using the internet, as well as hit on the skill, and yes, endurance necessary to use it well."

I miss how fun the internet used to be. There is something lost with the current torrent of entertainment that is readily fed through popularity based algorithms. Hacker news is about as close as I get to that feeling, but it’s not the same since it’s completely hub and spoke. Youtube can come close in a similar way, if you stay away from shorts. But, what I really miss, is how often I found myself falling off the web into other places on the internet. gopher and telnet and archie. There were these other places to explore, and because the net was so much smaller it made sense to explore.

FWIW, I’ve had a similar sensation playing on a shared minecraft server recently, the stuff people build is so varying and interesting.
OK, fair enough!

Me, no, I have only played around with it. From a technical level, I personally preferred WSL1, which I thought was more elegant. I am happy to concede your points as it certainly sounds like you have more experience with it than me.

WSL2 is just a VM, yes, I totally agree -- but a much better-integrated one than most non-techies could ever hope to achieve, and still better than most techies could achieve unless they really knew their stuff and they were competent in both of 2 different OSes.

From what I've seen over my working life, I'd say about 0.1% of Windows users would have the level of knowledge needed, and possibly more Linux ones -- but they mostly wouldn't want it or care.

My personal impression is that it's an attempt at the classic MICROS~1 "embrace and extend" manoeuvre on Linux.

No, I've never tried the Mac tools you mention, and I don't own a Yubikey or anything like it. I try new distros almost daily on my Mac but I have no need of any integration -- I am not a developer. I review distros sometimes, though, and occasionally things like hypervisors:

https://www.theregister.com/2023/09/29/utm_apple_hypervisor_...
> You're trying to make a point where there isn't one because you are an ideologue. First you mentioned "morbidly obese and diabetic"

I did? You appear to have confused me with someone else.

> Sorry but it's clear you have never been in a car you liked.

I have, actually, but I don’t let that blind me to the real costs. Driving is the most dangerous activity most of us regularly engage in and I think we should be mindful of the costs. For example, reducing the health impacts of high-speed busy roads on nearby residents is only fair to those people and has minimal impact on quality of life since those roads are a chore to drive on, too. We don’t need to ban someone’s fun trip to the mountains to make big quality of life improvements for millions of people.
given how long the droughts last, it would seem smart to double that number.
Until they manage to get the servers shut down, there's still 88,000,000 articles for download.
However if I read from parents that they have done
"nothing wrong" it is a red flag immediately. I have
two young kids. Being a good parent is hard.

Absolutely. I didn't fully appreciate my parents until I started raising pets. I cannot even tell you how many mistakes I've made raising pets despite loving them and trying my hardest, and pets are (in most regards) waaaay simpler.
True story, I was around in the 1990s so I was aware of those practices. Really advanced people would have a scheduled job running every hour (or on some basis) to keep an old copy just in case it was needed, usually a zip or tar file. So, a really crude versioning system.

Fast forward to 2008 and I am working on a project where we had an older person working on the project that would do this, use a scheduler to create a zip version. The younger guys I worked with said it was a crazy system and didn't understand why someone would do that. I told him it was an advanced practice just 10 years ago. Basically, people did a lot of stuff that would seem crazy now given the tools we have now.
Happy Scribe | Product Engineer Roles, different levels | Barcelona, Spain | Hybrid or 80% On Site (can sponsor VISA)

With a team of just 30 people and no investor funding, we’ve built a transcription and subtitling product used and loved by 300k people monthly. We are 100% bootstrapped and profitable since month 1, and immune from the funding shortages and layoffs that are impacting other companies.

We're hiring Product-focused Full Stack Engineers to help us scale our product.

This might be a once-in-a-lifetime chance to solve one of the fundamental AI challenges of this decade.

In the next year we want to hire 10 engineers; if you don't see anything that fits now, get in touch anyway. We want to learn about your career goals so we can reach out in the future.

We offer visa sponsorship and relocation packages.

Here is our careers page https://www.happyscribe.com/careers

Here is our product www.happyscribe.com

And here is a blog post from Pau, one of our Software Engineers, about his experience working here https://bit.ly/3y1R6bb

Use this link to apply

https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/happyscribe.com/cbc6d7f7-156b-4a5e-...

Compensation info

We are open to considering people from 2+ to 20+ years, which means it's a very wide bracket. We'd start from €50,000 but it could go up to €100,000+ for a very senior engineer. We also offer equity. See our careers page for the full list of benefits and perks.
If you're using subgraphs, with an edge across subgraph boundaries, it is slightly order dependent - a node will appear in the area it was first mentioned in. If you define all the nodes/subgraphs first and all the edges at the bottom you'd never notice this though.
One of my college classmates toted one of the lower end versions made from a white polycarbonate Macbook around. Worked surprisingly well for what it was but its stylus was a must, it would’ve been disastrous if it had tried to take a finger-based approach.
In French "contrefaçon" is the act of violating some "intellectual property" right including but not limited to copyright, so it's very broad.

I don't think there's an exact translation.
> Then I personally don’t care about needing JS to view the site (it’s 2024…)

In 2024, shouldn't hacker news visitors get that receiving a passive document to display locally is a thing, and having to run unaudited code from random strangers on your machine all the time is quite another? Then reopen the conversation about browser security?

Or, instead, get that simplicity is our ally, but unneeded complexity is the root of much evil?

Visit e.g. any stackexchange site with script disabled and be enlightened.
The alternative is NVIDIA charging for what they're spending money on and making CUDA as big a cost as the hardware. I don't know what I agree with but hardware-supported-software being free is a good thing, your competitors being able to use it for free is a bad thing.

I wonder legally if it would work to instead have licensing that charged a reasonable fee to run CUDA on non-NVIDIA hardware. Just don't enforce it for developers, but have it big enough and enforced enough so corporations would hesitate or pay... or just make it large enough to make it not make sense to run on non-NVIDIA cards.
I see we worked at the same place.
I'm curious what you can do in Pop_OS that makes MacOS software "meh" in comparison? I have a few friends who are Linux devotees yet watching them do stuff seems so tedious and slow in comparison to my workflows. Like I get that you can setup all sorts of keyboard shortcuts and stuff to do whatever you want, but that's also possible in MacOS, so what is it exactly that you can do better/faster in Pop_OS?

For most of my Linux friends they claim it's because they prefer the customization, but in practice it really seems more like they just dislike the Apple ecosystem in principle. I have yet to find a workflow they have that I can't do more easily and faster in MacOS. Similar experience with working in git in the terminal vs GUI apps. So many devs swear the terminal is "faster and more powerful for git" but in practice I am doing basic git functions faster and with fewer errors than they are just using the GitHub desktop app.

I would very much like to be proven wrong, I think OS competition is a good thing, I just want to see some practical examples.
Nvidia is worth more money than God because every ML pipeline out there uses CUDA and the only way to use CUDA is on Nvidia hardware - they already own the community’s favored software and the hardware it runs on. CUDA’s not the product, it’s the moat.
The C and C++ ecosystems are suffering from a selection effect, in that the people that have any concern about their code being correct are trying to drop them, while the people comfortable with the language are all the ones that don't know about the problems.

I expect the careless unaware culture to get worse with time as more and more aware people manage to leave it.
Dev use is a huge spectrum. You know your use cases better than us. For example dev use in my line of work just means you can run ssh and an editor.
Framed differently: it's 37% taller and 25% heavier. In the context of laptops, this is pretty hard not to notice. I have an MBA and my wife has an MBP — the difference is very easy to see/feel.
This sounds like Partial Evaluation and the Futamura Projection. The research around that shows that your interpreter determines the shape of the compiled output, so a formal proof of its application isn't necessary, if the $mix$-equivalent has the appropriate syntax and semantics for graph processes in its design.

I know this has been done for procedural languages and for declarative logical languages but I'm not aware of something like this specifically for graph processing and highly specialized code generation of graph processing. I wouldn't be surprised if Mix has been extended for this already, even if it has I'm sure there is still value in it.
Business travelers able to expense meals at airports likely won’t be flying Spirit either
This is a masterclass on customer support, thank you.
> I don't know how to explain the idiom "weight class"

I think “class” is the term you’re looking for. Or ballpark.
How do I know if this is legit or pseudoscience like alot of supplements or herbal remedy stuff.
Yeah by the time you realize you are ram bound that nvda stock might be worth a new computer outright.
No, but it's a real product.
>Mind boggling that so many smart people at Microsoft/AMD/Intel/HP/Dell have not been able to figure this out yet.

Follow the money. How much demand is there for it, Who's incentivized to fix it, how much does it cost to R&D, and will that feature increase profit margins?

The sad workaround is simply SSD's having faster boot times and setting a computer to hibernate instead of sleep when closed (and not on battery). It gets "close enough" for many.
A decade ago, CUDA was still offering a more usable platform than the competition. The problem could only have been averted if AMD had properly committed to investing in their platform at least decade ago, just as NVIDIA has been doing for almost 2 decades now.
I'm not saying that saying that critique on LLMS who are abusing copyleft licences is hypocritical.

I'm saying that the arguments that define this "abuse" often are.

What I specifically find hypocritical, we cannot suddenly put restrictions on what clients may or may not access, read, store and see our content. "Only a human may access my content" is just as bad as these numerous attempts of DRM that "hollywood" has tried to force down on the web.

More practically: I have a blog, with a CC-SA licence on my content. If an LLM starts spewing my exact paragraphs and articles without the same license (the SA-part asks this), I'd be pissed and have a right to call it "abuse" and could quite easily take the company behind it to court (If I wanted to).

But when that LLM merely hashes, vectorifies, trains on, and stores copies of my content so that their project can mimic my tone of voice, ideas and other content, so be it: I find it immoral to impose restrictions on what, who, where and how my content is read. Because I find DRM and such immoral.
Can you imagine a situation where the cost of labor suddenly came down and then the managers of a company telling the investors, "hey, looks like the cost of labor went down, which means the cost of all of our inputs went down, so I am just going to lower prices even though we already know the wtp price point, and you are going to get less profits!". Those managers would be fired that day, and replaced.
If more performance is better, why isn't this the default in the Linux networking stack? What are the drawbacks of using this and are there security implications?
Thank you for your input. That's a great idea.
Ask HN: What is your prediction for the world economy in the next 10 years?
Do you expect recession or growth?
Do you expect escalation of the current war conflicts?
Do you expect the EU/US or the Chinese/Russian economy prevails?
CUDA (and plenty of things lumped in with it that one would think of as CUDA) are not simply an API. Somewhere in between a programming language and a low level operating system.
FGL is a great example of how to make a "nice" high-level graph interface suited for functional programming. I'm a big fan. But it's orders of magnitude too slow and memory-inefficient for performance-sensitive graph computations—if you have even moderately sized graphs and graph algorithms are a bottleneck, you'll need to use something else, and probably something domain-specific. Given the way the interface works, I don't think you could have a high-performance version that would scale to large graphs.

In my experience this leaves FGL in an awkward spot: on the one hand, it isn't sufficient for heavy-duty graph processing; on the other, if you don't need fancy high-performance graph algorithms, chance are that encoding your problem as a graph is going to be more awkward than defining some domain-specific types for what you're doing. Graphs are such a general structure that they're usually the wrong level of abstraction for higher-level domain-specific logic.

Of course, sometimes you're writing graph code specifically and you need a nice way to express your graph algorithms without worrying about performance. In that case, FGL is great. I wrote a tutorial about using it to [generate mazes][1] and it helped me express the algorithms better than I would have been able to do without it. But that still leaves it as too narrow for something to be "the" graph representation in a language's standard library.

[1]: https://jelv.is/blog/Generating-Mazes-with-Inductive-Graphs/
> given the legal history of emulation.

Funny you should say this just after Nintendo shut down Yuzu and collected hefty damages in the settlement.
> Just searching around, the USA alone has 500,000 JDAMs sitting in warehouses.

Where did you find that? I'm surprised they publish it.