> your arguments against Rust come off as biased.

Yes, I'm pretty aware of this, and I keep this bias voluntarily, because Rust is generally touted (hyped?) as a Silver Bullet, and I'm wary of Silver Bullets. So, I want to highlight that fact.

> Sorry if I came across as rude.

No hard feelings. As I said, I'm not under delusion of a perfect life. I just said it.

> I just find it slightly puzzling how your stance on it is kind of going up and down. :)

I have a habit of mirroring the tone of the person I'm talking with. Combine it with the fact that English is not my native language, it's possible that "tone adjustment" is far from perfect.

> it's been quite a while since I've seen Rust zealotry on HN...

Yes, there's no zealotry here, and it's great, but I'm exposed to a wider community than HN people. Unfortunately, HN represents very small percent of the programmers around. A great talk I like about this issue is Robert Martin's "What Killed Smalltalk Could Kill Ruby, Too" [0]. Let's say, I'm marred and bitter from tons of zealotry and flamewars over the years (yes, I'm not young folk).

> While that likely does wonders for your mental health... [Snipped for brevity]

First of all, thanks. I pray that you work in a place you love and never work again. I'm very aware that how being solo makes me different and biased, and I think I highlighted at a couple of places.

On the other hand, I understand what teams and team-related activities are important for code quality. Let's say that I work as a team of two people. Current me knows everything about code, and my future me which inherits that code. So, I always code and comment for my future self, who doesn't know anything about the code. I always sharpen my axe, and try to improve myself as a "team of one". My personal state of the art of this practice is at [1]. I'll reflect what I have learnt from this project to the next one. The fact is while I do extensive C++ testing, I yet to pick up Go's testing abilities. That'll be the next step probably.

> Tinkering is nice and all but I'd probably make your life living hell if I had to review your PRs. :D

Give it a look at [1], and maybe [2], and let's have a chat again. I'm not perfect, for sure, but I think I'm no basement dweller when it comes to code and docs quality. :D

> OK, that's valid but I'd still urge you to reassess your opinion of the Rust community.

As a recovering grumpy, I'll do. I don't like to be bitter grampa (to be). I'm fine with the grampa part, but not with the bitter part.

> No harm done IMO, and I don't think that I disagree strongly with anything you said.

Same, no hard feelings here. I can say that you're good sport even, and I don't use this lightly. I enjoyed what you wrote and writing this comment.

> I am mostly saying that you working what you love and working solo is keeping you quite disconnected from what are good team practices.

Of course, but I'm trying to incorporate the good practices I can use as a team of two (as aforementioned). Also, I'm mingling with more Free Software teams than I might show.

> Maybe you have a compiler in your brain as you have alluded to but I will trust a good test suite over a human brain every day.

I'll trust my brain first, then evaluate that with the compiler, then evaluate the end product with a good test suite. Then feed what I learnt to myself, so I don't repeat the same mistakes as much as I can. My intuition gives me perspective, but I always operate on the assumption that I'm the worst programmer in the universe (no kidding).

[0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YX3iRjKj7C0

[1]: https://git.sr.ht/~bayindirh/nudge

[2]: https://github.com/TRUBA-HPC/lssrv