skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In my experience, it's either hard to articulate or it's something I wouldn't say to them like "you came across as very arrogant." Not the same thing but imagine dating scenarios. I've had plenty of situations where there were no red flags and also I couldn't have filled out a questionnaire about why I didn't "click" with a person.

That's not always the case. "Your writing sample was poor" so take a writing class. But I'd say that has been the minority and I could name one mistake where I assumed that was a flaw we could fix.
Stumpy: Matrix profile time series analysis
Didn't pick the right fans for going extra slow. These run at 1700 RPM by default, whereas Noctua has a version - even in the redux line - that runs at 1200 RPM. Though the non-redux like gets even slower - so much that Noctua includes a "low noise adapter" (presumably a resistor).
>> I find that utterly revolting. Imagine how much good you could do with that money.

I don't begrudge rich folk spending their money. I begrudge those who don't spend it.

When a billionaire spends money, it ultimately goes to people. Staff obviously, but also the entire supply chain for that staff. If they drop a million on flowers, we'll that goes yo flower sellers, who pay the flower growers, and do on. In other words it -is- doing good, its the economy.

Now I'm not advocating for trickle down economics. Thats not my point. But is it better to die with a billion dollars, or is it better to be an ex billionaire who dies broke?
They're in for a shock when the rest of us weld the doors shut from the outside.
Could be fiction. But could also be that the people that launched the company have contacts going many years back prior. Not every company is started from zero.
I've seen reports and debates that modern heat spreaders are too large for the pea method, and that an X pattern is more common now.

Here's one of the test videos you can find on Youtube about the subject: https://youtu.be/aaxBYrZFJZM?t=199
Yeah.

A few highlights, as can be seen in some of the blog posts mentioned by other replies:

- 'Span<T>' to represent chunks of either managed OR unmanaged memory without using unsafe pointers throughout [0][1]

- Not relevant to this task necessarily, but a lot of machinery has been added to allow reuse of objects for tasks like queuing thread pool work, or waiting for an asynchronous result.

- Lots of intrinsics helpers for SIMD workloads, and increased usage of such intrinsics in internal parsers/etc.

- Generally improving a lot of the internal IO to take advantage of other improvements in the runtime.

- PGO (Performance Guided Optimization) on the JIT side, essentially helps with things like better devirt [2] and other improvements.

- AOT compilation, if that's your thing, (I do believe the fastest C# 1BRC submissions use this)

[0] - To be clear, unsafe can still be faster, however for most cases Span is fine and gives you a little more runtime safety.

[1] - You can also grab a Span<T> of a primitive (i.e. int, char) within a method, so long as you don't blow up stack, this is very nice when you need a small buffer for parsing but don't want to thrash the GC or deal with volatile or locks on some sort of pool.

[2] - Devirt historically was a problem in 'call heavy' .NET apps when Interfaces are used, before PGO there was more than one library I worked on where we intentionally used abstract base classes rather than interfaces due to the need to squeeze as much out as we could.
I guess there’s a whole book about it, so I could look it up if I wasn’t lazy. But I am.

I don’t get Saddam’s described point of view here. Even if he assumed the CIA was all-seeing and, as a result, aware that he had canceled his programs, wouldn’t the fact that we were building (from his point of view) an intentionally fabricated case to invade his country indicate that we really intended to invade it? Why would we fabricate a cause to attack him, if we weren’t planning on it?
Computers can write random text, and that is not considered literature (unless we are in the infinite monkey problem). To be called literature, it must “run”, in the same way as code, but in our brains. It must rhyme if is poetry, must be accepted by an editor, must be liked by its readers, be coherent and so on.

Anyone can write anything, but to be called a program or a piece of literature there are some requirements to be met.
A strawman? Sorry, but not sorry. I will keep defending mine and other people's ability to criticise things that have plenty of room for improvement.
If you only need zero downtime deployments, compose and traefik/caddy are enough.

If you need to replicate storage, share networks and otherwise share resources across multiple hosts, kubernetes is better suited.

But you'll also have much less control with compose, e.g. no limiting of egress/ingress and more.
>> is either the som of human hopes and dreams, or the sum of human fears

Or Sam Altman pumping his fund.
Germany's Unexpected Economic Crisis [video]
which corp is considered to be good now days?..
Being tied to the cloud is fine if you don’t care about money. Eventually companies do
TH1520 with the XuanTie C910 core. Avoid. That particular platform is really incredibly slow, Cortex-A5x level. And with RVV 0.7.1 instead of 1.0 too.
in general smalltalk-80 and similar stack bytecodes include almost no stack fiddling; the only stack-manipulation bytecodes included are dup and drop, not even swap or over. instead of stack fiddling, you have load and store bytecodes—in smalltalk, you usually have them in precisely the places the source program had atomic expressions in, respectively, rvalue or lvalue contexts. this simplifies the compiler and also allows you to use a decompiler instead of storing the source code

even on the f18a core in chuck moore's latest designs from greenarrays, there's no swap; you have dup, drop, over, and r> and >r (called push and pop). and of course the way he generalized it cleanly to parallel execution is by putting 144 computers on the same chip, each with separate ram. the code is also pretty compact but not in a way that's practical for bytecode interpretation on a byte-oriented computer
the post says "a reason to repeat that phrase"

not THE reason, not THE ONLY reason, so it is not COMPLETELY untrue. agitated?
That's clickbait since you are supposed to want to click to find out how.

"Sun sales VP demoed me my own OSS DTrace Toolkit with attribution stripped."
thats unfortunate, I think that means they arent aware that the job of SRE is functionally identical to a sysadmin from
2005 in terms of responsibilities and required knowledge.

We just live on a higher level of abstraction and have better tools & processes now.
Dingdingding.

I moved in with my girlfriend, and I am wanting for us to be very intentional with the furniture/house purchases we make, buying used where possible. So, I tell her to use Facebook Marketplace (RIP CL for the normies). A day later, she’s excited to go pick up a mirror from someone on there, and without looking at the posting, I go accompany her to pick it up from this stranger.

When we get there, it’s someone selling cheap chinese mirrors from out of a shipping container (while dodging taxes and other regulations I am sure!)

She loves the mirror and wants it anyway. Super flimsy, overpriced, bad materials, ecologically damaging, publicly damaging (no taxes!)

This is not what I had in mind when I wanted her to buy high quality pre-owned furniture, but this kind of cheap scheme is winning out over and over again.
Tribalism. People actually have a aversion to heated public debate, fearing the tribe breaks up. That's also why there can always be only one plan.
Huhhh... this article could really use some love from an AI service that finds typos in text.
Aka the sam of human fears
That's not possible. The furthest things we've ever sent out are the voyager probes, and they're 135 and 162au away, each. We'd have to get twice that distance to even be at the distance that we expect a planet 9 to be.

Even if we managed to get many multiples of the distance planet 9 is from the sun to take pictures backward and send them home to earth, it's _so far_ from the sun that a) the amount it would occlude the sun is ridiculously small, if it ever even lined up. At that distance, the sun just looks like another star in the sky. That's like waiting for one particular asteroid to block out the North Star. And b) the orbit period would still need to be short enough that you could see it transit a few times to use the technique that scientists use to detect planets elsewhere. Just seeing something block the sun doesn't tell you what it was that blocked it, especially at 400-800au distance. Plus, then you're talking about latencies of about a light month, which makes it super hard to even know to look for the thing you saw (a month ago).
> For example, take the simple family tree above. If I’m person 28 on this family tree, and I’m making a genealogy, I would care about my own ancestors, but I might not care much about my ancestors’ siblings (my aunts and uncles) and their descendants. So most of the family tree won’t be present in a genealogy database

Or, the data is correct and a lot of lines of people just die out without offspring.
I double checked and he mentioned a couple other points. One was incrementally hashing the keys to reduce double read. The other was about storing pointers for the value structs more efficiently.

I encourage implementing maps and other DS btw, i was just curious
If you were to create any model of the universe, you would require it to have the correct (observed) percentage of galaxies without dark matter, right?

You assert that it is impossible for a model of a dark matter dominated universe to "predict" galaxies without dark matter, but that is exactly what people are looking at here in a large scale cosmological simulation:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.05836
> if a compiler can't prove that between accesses the variable hasn't been modified (which happens actually very frequently). I've seen x10 speedups of computations in tight loops when I explicitly cached a value used in the loop into a variable from under a pointer/reference.

This is indeed an important gotcha! Let's say you have a filter and want to process an array of floats. If the coefficient is a struct member and has the same type as the audio samples, you must cache it in a local variable, otherwise the compiler might reload it from memory on every loop iteration. ('restrict' can somewhat help with these kind of aliasing issues, but you need to be careful.)
I am sure generative ai will be able to cure cancer after humans figure it out then post it to the internet.
Scrum is pretty high on the list too
Second one in that list says 'couple of months' https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39542165
This is BS. All iOS apps are sandboxed. PWA works in Android, Ubuntu Touch, even worked in Firefox OS (OWA). And Apple cannot work it out?
> They correctly understood that heliocentrism predicted a parallax but failed to measure that with the primitive observational equipment they had.

Aristotle in De Caelo (Book II, part 14):

> The earth, then, also, whether it move about the centre or as stationary at it, must necessarily move with two motions. But if this were so, there would have to be passings and turnings of the fixed stars. Yet no such thing is observed. The same stars always rise and set in the same parts of the earth.

* http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/heavens.2.ii.html

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Heavens

See also:

> In the mathēmatikoi tradition of Pythagoreanism the Earth was removed from the center of the universe. The mathēmatikoi believed that the Earth, along with other celestial bodies, orbited around a central fire. This, they believed, constituted a celestial harmony.[24]

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagoreanism#The_mathēmatiko...
Melange: Build APKs from Source Code
Using Go's profiling tool with its "source" view: I used "go tool pprof -http=: cpu.prof", where cpu.prof was generated by "go-1brc -cpuprofile=cpu.prof -revision=9 measurements.txt".
Aviation Safety Reporting System (1993)
> Anyone who attacks a system with the intent of causing minimal harm and reporting what they find should be protected.

Do you think that people should be allowed to penetration test your house without your permission?

At what point does a system become big enough that you think people should be allowed to attack that system - regardless of its owner’s desires - as long as the attacker has subjectively good intentions?

I am sympathetic to the idea behind your comment, but I don’t see how it’s compatible with strong private property rights. I don’t want you attacking my systems without my permission.
No it isn't. I use and like the app also, but the GitHub repo link on their page takes you to a separate release artifact management repo, not the source code itself.

> https://getfancontrol.com/

Their linked GitHub repo, which only has a compiled zip uploaded for release artifact creation, not the code:

> https://github.com/Rem0o/FanControl.Releases

From the repo:

"Sources for this software are closed."

I wonder why the author hasn't open sourced it - there doesn't appear to be any commercial aspect to the tool, and the author makes a point of it being "free" on the site.
"She has cancer" is a specific event, so we logically deduce that it is "a type of cancer".

When you say "AI will cure cancer" that is not a singular event, so you assume cancer in the plural. You would have to say "AI will cure some forms of cancer" if you didn't mean the plural here.
Collision repairs are also going up as people buy increasingly complex/expensive vehicles.
You really think the barrier was low to create almost perfectly realistic nudes that matched skin tones when you had to find a nude picture that matched the skin tone, film grain, etc and use photoshop from a computer than it is now when you can just create a free email account, go to a website, upload a picture, select the body part and click “edit”?

It was never as easy or happening with the scale or as easy to make it look realistic.

Doing that in Photoshop was not something the average middle schooler could do realistically - let alone ok their phone, for free
Whoa. I didn’t expect you to say something this awful. Would you mind considering whether to edit that out?

(If you’re wondering which part, re-read your comment and imagine it was about your father.)
And he got them good. Iraq was the headstone of stability for the whole region.
> blit pixels on the screen

This is where you lose me.

The browser is a bloated beast that incorporates and reimplements so much of the OS. But not that much. The OS still interacts with the OS far too much for static linking to make much of a difference. And even if there is a modern Chromium 0day, like the Skia exploit I mentioned, sure, that's a Chrome bug. That's still a bigger problem for older OSes that have absolutely no protection once something escapes the sandbox.
I think most people would like fewer Elon Musks, not more. Your Everest example also assumes that giving an unfathomable amount of money to Musk is more beneficial to society than using it for other purposes. I find that hard to believe.
Ask HN: How to Automate iPhone Setup?
I configure a new machine quite often. Because of that, I have a dotfiles repo that uses strap [0]. Wherever I have to set up my Mac from the scratch, I simple clone that repo and run script, and after a few hours all software (specified in Brewfile) is downloaded and configuration applied. Is there any way I can come close to this on iOS?
Currently, every time I have a new iPhone (or do a hard reset), it takes me a few hours to download all the apps I use and sign into them, and apply my Settings.

PS I know about iCloud backup, but that’s not exactly what I want.

[0]: https://github.com/MikeMcQuaid/strap
> The real question is: How do I use cannabis correctly? What can it actually do for you?

Excellent questions, and I think this is the right way to approach this substance: as a scientific inquiry, not a vice to feel ashamed of, or a godsend magic substance that solves all problems.

> smoking once every 2 months has net benefit

Strong agree. Specifically, what I've observed is after long periods of productivity with the brain "loaded" with a lot of context, a joint can help uncover lateral connections and find new perspectives and approaches. However when the brain is "empty" as on a Monday morning, smoking is just counter-productive, since there are no connections to be made, no new perspectives to be had, and the lateral thinking just means loss of productivity (focus on the wrong things).

The fundamental difficulty is with the "once" part of the plan. It's very easy to stay in the smoking loop after the first day of use (get the relief constantly like you say), and it can turn into a week of use. For many people, the risk of losing weeks to substance use loop + one more week to get back to baseline mood might end up as net negative, despite the initial benefits.
I also like the impressionist art style, never saw something like that before. But it runs with very low frame rates even on a Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, which has a fairly beefy GPU for a phone. It performs a bit better in Firefox than in Chrome on Android 14.
The front half is for introducing ideas. The back chapters where never that great IMHO. They get both too in the weeds and at the same time missing actionable advice.
Thanks for the anecdote k8sToGo
All of those figures are irrelevant. Profit margin (sustained) is a clear signal.

https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/PGR/progressive/pr...

https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/ALL/allstate/profi...

Nominal amounts are never relevant for this discussion, and it is trivial that nominal profits would keep increasing since the currency is worth less over time. Otherwise, a business would eventually go out of business due to not having sufficient cushion.
Neurons help flush waste out of brain during sleep
Some reddit comments mention it reproduces back to Vista (2008). I am kind of shocked no one has noticed this bug in that time. I guess under typical rwlock usage you just get random instances of shared lockers unable to acquire the lock and no deadlock, but still.
"A cease and desist letter can be sent to the person who is harassing you to demand that they immediately stop their behavior, which may include unwanted communications, stalking, or threats." and "Harassment is generally defined as unwanted, unwelcome, and uninvited behavior which annoys, threatens, intimidates"

I've always wondered if that would apply to newsletters who ignore/refuse my opt-out request. "unwanted communications" and "uninvited behavior which annoys" is pretty much how I feel when companies keep sending me their newsletter after I told them to stop.
The definition of conservative is flexible. The first category is probably not willy-nilly flying private jets and having a lot of dedicated personal staff today.

So, in that respect it does seem different from the other categories. Of course, priorities play a role.
> Your needs and wants are not a claim on my life. My life is my own. If you want to feed your money into whatever you define good as, go ahead. Dont expect anyone to cater to your whims with the fruits of their labors though.

This quote is interesting, as it supposes that you'll ever be in this position (and you may be. It's HN and I haven't opened your bio). Many people think the same way, which leads into my point:

A lot of policy failures arise from voters being wooed away from the certainty of a social safety net by the idea of obscene wealth. And therefore we end up overborrowing for infrastructure when we should be taxing based on how someone benefits from it.

> Everyone thinks they have a claim to goods and services they did not earn and hate people that earned them

Not everyone, only the people who recognize that the infrastructure that enabled someone's success still needs to be paid for, and that many of those who thrive on such underlying infrastructure refuse to pay for it.
I mean, I suppose we're not chattel slaves or sending our kids into mines.

I mean, someone is, because that is the only way to get billionaires.

But it's not us or our kids, at least.

HN is great for getting a little window into how the rich sociopaths in this culture live.

When folks write ahistorical fantasy, as you've done here, it's a very useful picture to help understand what kinds of really bad things folks are capable of thinking about the world.
Better try Sailfish OS, which also runs Android apps, or Ubuntu Touch with Anbox.
That's because you're trying to frame my statement on your terms, rather than catching your breath and thinking. Probably because you didn't understand my point but are really excited to tell me how wrong I am.

So let me restate it a different way. I'm gravely concerned with the destructive potential of AI and the exploitation in this article is just one of hundreds of negative consequences. Yet advocates of AI are shitting on any attempt to constrain it, and instead are tripping over themselves to monetize it, risks be damned.
Sure you can. Just don't shut down counter-arguments from, say, believers in certain form of animism, by implying that their side is invalid because there is no universally accepted definition of intelligence without giving your own assertion that same treatment.
>Except that he doesn't acknowledge other points of view

False, he explicitly acknowledges other points of view on what defines intelligence:

"There is no concrete definition so there is no concrete way of deciding if something is intelligent."

Acknowledging that your way of thinking isn't the only way of thinking doesn't make someone a hypocrite, it's actually a sign of intelligence (in my opinion).
> state approved

Why? Is a higher "authority" the only solution you can imagine?

Surely you realize that public key cryptography exists and that the politician/professor/activist has people who know him who can confirm he creates the video and those people know others until you reach everyone in a few steps.

What we really need is a network of trust and to teach people how trust works.
My father dying would be no loss to the world either. It would be a loss to me, but only to me. These are inconvenient truths, regardless of the feelings you may have about them.

You and I have experienced life differently. Regardless, I have edited my comment to err on the side of caution, thank you.
I kind of feel like that's exactly why AI is helpful here:

- Grab a cancer (or virus, bacteria, etc.)

- Sequence it

- AI will develop a custom therapy for that cancer

In broad strokes, it's not hard to develop a therapy for any specific cancer or other disease in a specific individual. There are several broad strategies:

- A targeted, custom phage to kill a bacteria (or extrapolate to killing a type of cells)

- A custom vaccine to make your body make antibodies specific to a disease

- And so on....

This is a ≈2 year research effort to do in each case, and perhaps a ≈10 year validation effort, not to mention regulatory. By that point, the patient is dead, or AIDS has mutated a few dozen times, and regardless, you need a massive research team to do so. And to do so, you've spent many million dollars on a research team that whole time.

"AI will cure [X]" consists of AI doing the same thing instantly. I go to a doctor. My chronic disease is sequenced. My specific immune system is encouraged to attack that specific disease. I'm cured.

(And yes, we each have a very different immune system; see MHC for an example of how and why)
Engineering effort