skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sorry, I could have explained that better. The biggest value add that k8s has is that it gives you as many or as few autoscaling groups as you need at a given time using only a single pool (or at least fewer pools) of heterogeneous servers. There's lots of fine print here but it really does let you run the same workloads on less hardware and to me that's the first and last reason you should be using it.

I wouldn't start with k8s and instead opt for ASGs until you reach the point where you look at your AWS account and see a bunch of EC2 instances sitting underutilized.
Alternatively/in addition, significant inheritance taxes for the ultra-rich.

A lot of wealth is multi-generational and nepotistic (i.e. do we really think Jim Walton would have got the job if he wasn't the son of the founder, and even if he did, would he have earned as much as he has?).
I geeked out on something like this for my TrueNAS server setting fan speed based on drive temperature with a PID controller. e.g.

https://github.com/dak180/TrueNAS-Scripts/blob/master/FanCon...

(That's not mine. I think I wrote a variation in Python.)

Then I realized: my server is in the unfinished part of my basement where I can't hear it anyway. Let's just run the fans at 80% speed all the time since that's sufficient to keep the drives cool.
Possibly it would be better to simply have the root domain fb.me on the list
Yet another retcon of REST that never once mentions MIME types, and thus missed the point.

All this gobbledygook about HTML “being REST” is silly and doesn’t match how things were discussed at the time.

HATEOAS is delivered by encouraging different resources to have different MIME types, and offering a service document that lets you know what all the resources available are with their associated MIME types.

That’s it.

It’s really not very complicated, EXCEPT of course that almost no one not intimately involved with the IETF ever bothers defining new MIME types.

This is unfortunate! It would be great if everyone would go ahead and document how their resources work, and then maybe we really could deliver on the promise of REST.

I do agree that reasonably consistent verbs and paths are pleasant things for folks reading and debugging HTTP traffic, but that’s about all they have to do with REST.

But it’s unfortunate we keep getting these explanations that somehow fail to get at the core of the original meaning.
OMG! Ha, so embarrassed. Thanks for the correction! It's too late for me to edit. sigh....
I will add as a footnote, and I know you likely did not mean this, but it happens often enough, that one should distinguish between Aristotle's scientific works and philosophic works. That is, while his physics may be obsolete (though we should show gratitude, as this was an early attempt from which our later traditions drew), his metaphysics is not, for example.
Semi-automatic whole-house iPhone internet failover
I doubt many people appreciate getting a call like this, but for people who find it to be suffering, it's a good exercise to practice stoicism / unattachment.
Learning to handle calls like this will make you better at professional conversations. The article alludes to that but dismisses it without examination.
A circle needs no explanation (to people who can see it). Math is a construct of humans which applies meaning to symbols, and need to be explained, which can be rather problematic.

Boolean algebra will need to explain true, false, arrow implications, negation, etc..
Another essay from the same site helped this make more sense to me. If your immediate reaction was "But my code doesn't know how to handle the links in the response!", check it out:

https://intercoolerjs.org/2016/05/08/hatoeas-is-for-humans.h...
While some of the complexity goes away when it's on prem in to parts of the US, having to order actual hardware, putting it into racks, hiring, training, retaining the people there to debug actual hardware issues when they arise, dealing with HVAC concerns, etc is a lot of complexity that's probably completely outside of your core business expertise but that you'll have to spend mental cycles on when actually operating your own data center.

It's totally worth it for some companies to do that, but you need to have some serious size to be concerned with spending your efforts on lowering your AWS bill by introducing details like that into your own organization when you could alternatively spend those dollars to make your core business run better. Usually your efforts are better spent on the latter unless you are Netflix or Amazon or Google.
I think this is you falling on the "misunderstands medicine" part of the equation.
Never heard the Lynch one called junk. But I do think some people don't value proper theatrics, and are just special effects junkies.

I'm still annoyed at how much was cut out of part 1 despite it being as long as it was. I get going for ambience but the whole banquet scene was missing. None of Duncan suspecting Lady Jessica. Duke Leto is barely developed as a character at all.
You are arguing that keeping a mass murderer with a large army in power is a "more secure word". Saddam Hussein was a huge regional threat to US allies - Israel and Saudi Arabia, he was also a huge international threat by supporting terrorism. No, the world is a safer place without his presence.
Technology is an amoral form of power that accrues to those who have access to it, as well as have the most access to it. In unequal societies, this accrual is to those who already have wealth, political power, etc. If the opposite was true, as you claim, the most technologically advanced countries would have seen decreasingly inequality in the period you fit. In reality, they’ve only seen the opposite.
They buy increasingly complex and expensive vehicles because there is no option in a significant portion of the world for a simple, functional, economic car.
Linking people up with other people in the same soceoeconomic class with similar interests.
Which should be left at zero unless you can get over the "you actually do have a responsibility to take basic safety measures for your users" hurdle.

Instead we routinely get zero security at all and also heavily encouraging people to install entirely unchecked stuff in a built-in and implicitly-trusted first party UI.
Understand resiliency patterns/trade-offs to architect efficiently in the cloud
Do yourself a favor and wrap that thing in a VM
That's mostly false for a nontrivial fraction of queries in most bigger projects. If your queries are doing sane things (not regularly full table scanning for each customer, ...), little things like datetime conversions as the rows are instantiated in Python easily dwarf the cost of the database (depending on your networking setup and exact queries, perhaps just in throughput instead of latency, but Python will the still at least be the "cost" bottleneck for your app).
Yes, there's a deep culture of questionnaires and dubious "scans" in the security industry. It's all we got because nobody is actually allowed to kick the tires. Nobody is allowed to actually test the security of the systems they rely on.
> With £10M? I mean, some good, surely. But not really a lot

You could outright transfer it to some of the poorest people in the world (via https://www.givedirectly.org/, you'd add ~5% to their total cash transfer amount). They could then invest it in whatever they need.
Thats pretty cool. No comments left in the code after the revert though. Are they relying on their minds and commit history as documentation of invariants? How do they prevent the same mistake from being made again in the future?
Looks like it's an Aus/NZ thing. Funnily enough the British meaning is the opposite (to jeer).
You can build a small school in a third world country, such as Nepal, for £10k. So you could build somewhere around 1000 small schools (or a lesser number of bigger ones).
So you don't use things you don't understand, valid point. But, saying others are using k8s as a way to use up free time is pretty useless too as we have managed k8s offerings and thus don't need the exercise. If you don't need k8s don't use it, thanks. Pretty useless story honestly
Did Apple Just Make a Gambling App?
It seems to me that much of the zero trust architecture is relevant to enterprises with a lot of users. For individuals or home users, there might be just one or few users, who need to access it all. There, a simple VPN server might be all you need. There is not so much need for segmentation, identity based authentication, etc given that they often come at the expense of the reliance on third parties.
Hi, author here. I'm slightly confused by your bullet points - are you asking if Hancho supports these patterns?

- "Execution" of a rule can add new task nodes to the DAG (via Rules with command=<async Pythonfunction>

- Implicit DAG is there in the form of Rules that depend on promises generated by other Rules.

- DAG edge types are just the promises returned by Rules. A custom rule that returns a promise that resolves to an empty array (or a dynamically-populated array) is totally valid

- 'Batteries included' rules are out of scope for the base release but I will probably add a default rules.hancho with my preferred C++ build commands.

- In-system dependency generators can be as simple as "glob.glob('*.cpp')", or as fancy as you're willing to write.
Nice that's exactly what I'm looking for, as I use KDE and Qt apps fit in so well.

Will the client side be open source? I hope so because I'm on FreeBSD so you probably won't make a compiled version :)
First season of Altered Carbon was good. Also The Peripheral, albeit canceled before its time. Glad Gibson went with Apple to finally let someone take a crack at putting Neuromancer on screen; they're the only ones I'd trust not to cut it short too.

Still waiting for someone to put Daemon and Freedom(tm) on a screen of any size; that could get fun, but probably would need to be a series to avoid cutting out way too much.
I'm with you on this.

I'd like to expand your artistic vs practical point by denying that really is a dichotomy, at least not in practice.

I've done lots of creative writing, and most of what matters in that domain is solving really pragmatic problems: is this metaphor clear? In what order should the reader receive this information? How can I get exposition across in a way that isn't distracting? Do these words go together well? Viewed askance, those (and infinitely more) are all constraints (many self-imposed, or at least self-perceived), that allow "art" to happen, and define the terms on which it succeeds.

For my job-job I do lots of pragmatic writing, too - think documentation and technical analysis - and I do my damndest to find "creative" ways to present material. I'll write things like "this next bit is really technical, if you're not in roles X, Y, and Z you might as well skip to the next page. For those of you who have to read this, imagine you're a squirrel", and then name all the variables after a type of nut. It's makes it more fun for me to write, sure, but the actual, pragmatic reason is that more people read and understand it when I put in effort to make material less dry.

(I realize some people on HN would be terribly offended by that last example, and think I'm insulting their intelligence by being "cute", and "why can't he use Σ, like Euler intended?" Well, you're not my audience - or, at least, not the most important among my day-job audience. In other words, if that's you, imagine you're a nut.)
I feel you, however I would say at the very least I find the YC submission process a very useful exercise and encourage all people thinking of doing a startup to complete it, even if you don't submit it. When I submitted to YC and got an interview with them, they were extremely courteous to me, way more so than the VCs and investors I'd dealt with, and while they ultimately didn't accept me they sent me a lot of feedback with how I could improve for next time. That is much appreciated and I won't forget it.

As a counter point it would be nice to see some data around predictors such as degrees, connections etc.
Again, the point is that you can't just compare $X billion over the past N years with $Y billion during a different N-year period. The numbers have gone up dramatically even if the actual damage didn't.
We need to acknowledge that 'trickle down' is a myth, and that the'rich gets richer' phenomenon is much stronger. And that is a massive democratic problem, which will destabilise our societies.

For our democracies to survive we must put many different taxes in place to counter the rich get richer, and the perverce gathering of power it causes. There won't be a single policy to fix it, and actually finding a good compromise which helps growth instead of hindering it is hard (especially giving the constant lobbying from the rich).

Personally I am quite for a high inheritance tax, but it's definitely not enough. I have no problem with JK Rowling being rich. But I don't think it makes sence that she has a wealth 1000000 times what a teacher makes in their lifetime. And it certainly don't make sence that her child (if she has any) should receive a wealth that size.
Reset Your Social Media Annually
> This degradation of software by web apps shows the lack of optimal resource utilization of even one of the most powerful chips of recent times.

A-fucking-men. Web tools are for building web apps, software tools are for building software. I avoid all these goddamn electron things like the plague if at all fucking possible.

Garbage on phones, garbage on computers, garbage on tablets. Garbage.
This is exactly the confusion caused due to mismatched terminology. In the explanation the “client” is a browser. But obviously the browser isn’t an active participant in the exchange. The actual client of the banking service is the human looking at the browser. The human knows how to react because they know the English word “deposits” and can continue this game of adventure by interpreting whatever comes back, again based on English labels.

Now consider how you’d write a script for a computer to use this “API” in automated fashion.

Nobody creates a JSON-over-HTTP protocol because they think it’ll be easier for human clients to use. The area of controversy is how computers should talk to each other.

Another way of saying this is that the concept of “self-describing” data is a handwave that is doing a huge amount of work here.
Giving a single moment of thought to what happens when the paste is squished to this should lead everyone to the conclusion that a square that is equidistant from the edge to the center is the right pattern with maybe a dot it the middle for piece of mind.

That wasn't tested there.
But it would tho? Imagine if your battery was the earth's core. So basically you're pumping majority of the incoming energy inside the earth. Less heat is reflected to to warm the athmosphere, hence a cooling effect.

Once you release the stored energy it's a different story.
It's generic corporate sociopathic ass-covering.

Facebook, when it was new and turning the tech industry upside down, made a name for itself by treating candidates with more respect than the companies they fled did,and generally improving upon the culture of their former employers. One of their innovations was to give a bit of concrete feedback on what the negative aspects of the evaluation were.
Phoenix LiveView works this way
I agree jealousy can be present when the Have Nots look at the purchasing decisions of the Haves.

And I also agree that there is subjectivity in the decisions in whether the wealthy are self-indulging kings of the globalized era, or examples of the spoils the geniuses or innovators can achieve as they bring value to earth.

But the billionaires can justify their despotism and self-indulgence to the masses as they are marched to the guillotine. And the intellectual discourse on the subjectivity of hedonistic decisions be silenced. The French aristocracy learned the lessons of royal restraint the hard way.
Gemini Advanced got it right on the second attempt. On the first attempt it mistakenly thought that the problem was a tic-tac-toe game, but after I told it that it was an IQ test I got the correct answer.

I also changed the wording of the prompt slightly:

Here are some patterns:

...

Which of the follwing answers shows the correct substitution for the last pattern (the one with the ???)?

...
I've been trading for 4 years on the side mostly on intuition. I like to think one can emotionally program the powerful computer that is the unconscious mind to serve the distributed monster of global finance for profit. Sometimes I even do tarot. Seems to kinda work LoL what could possibly go wrong????
It is nice 0.10 finally landed those memory and speed optimisation.

But the King remains HALIC. In terms of MT encoder it still uses 3.5x more memory than HALIC, and 6x encoding time compared to HALIC. While offering the same or smaller files size in Lossless. Hopefully JPEG XL could narrow those gaps some days.
Just buy a large AIO water cooler. Replace the included fans with Noctua. That is the full story of how I made my computer silent despite having a CPU with a TDP of over 200W.
Try putting a simple https app on a managed k8s cluster and use google/whatever to figure it out, that should get you started.
SciFi TV and movies ALL depend how you define SciFi, as arguably most of what passes for it is more like fantasy or horror with the aesthetics of something ...sciencey.

Good thing I like those genres too.
Author here. I do most of my development in WSL but do have a few projects that I want to get working again with Windows/MSVC - I will be using Hancho for those builds and expect it to work fine cross-platform though I haven't tackled it yet.
Of the content creators I watch the women seems to talk a lot about Tiktok memes but none of the men has even mentioned anything from Tiktok. So I think 30+ male nerds basically don't use Tiktok, but women do.
there's a sort of bifurcation of SRE responsibilities with one branch focusing on software-enabled automation and the other on "systems engineering" aka sysadmin. Both are called SREs at Google which seems to cause widespread confusion externally (and even within Google). Also see so called "Ben Treynor Curve"[0]

[0] - https://www.usenix.org/system/files/login/articles/login_jun...
"AI will cure X" is equivalent to "Human intelligence will cure X", except that we expect AI to get there first because it's denser and can be replicated orders of magnitude more quickly and cheaply. You can levy a couple of counterpoints- that humans will never cure cancer either or that this kind of AI is impossible- but those are magical pessimism moreso than the alternative is magical optimism.
Even in the US, in tech firms, it's pretty common to have happy hours where everyone drinks a bit.

I don't drink at all due to my sleep apnea, and don't even have caffeine after 1pm for the same reason, so I'm pretty much always in this kind of awkward position of sipping on a water throughout the night while coworkers get more and more inebriated.

I don't think it's ever directly hurt my chances of promotion or anything, but I do think it makes socializing harder.
Will do. Interesting looking show you run btw.
is there anything with a lightweight learning curve akin to Obsidian that uses a accessible format?
> by the way I think are in bad taste,

I'm sincerely sorry if I offended any Apple employees in the process. Otherwise I'm not really sure what "bad taste" you could be referring to. Maybe I scared off a few $AAPL shareholders by suggesting the obvious? Help me at least understand my mistake before we ignore it.

> It's not like Apple mislead a bunch of people

Nor did Microsoft when they sold Windows with Netscape-inhibiting features. Nor did Ma Bell when they modified telephones to work on their network. Both of those ended with the courts recommending a company breakup, Apple is going to need a stronger defense if it's purely based on non-deception.

Apple's arbitrary limitation of basic capabilities cannot persist in a competitive market. The USB-C regulation was proof that Apple can acquiesce, the world did not crumble because Lightning or MFi is now depreciated. Similarly, holding Apple to minimum standards shouldn't threaten their bottom line if they truly offer superior first-party services. Their kicking and screaming more or less confirms that Apple's profitability hinges on total control, not premium differentiation.

> Therefore, I think that you have poor understandings of the boundaries of these relationships.

It's based on my understanding of the history and precedent of US and European antitrust rulings. If that doesn't apply to your jurisdiction then maybe you're right. In the majority of Apple's meaningful markets, their service revenue is seriously threatened.
TC-39 isn't "betting the house on TS": the proposal is generic and intentionally doesn't define types it defines syntax for annotations of types. It's basically "type information may appear between a colon after an identifier and an equals sign or other terminator" and "type is a statement keyword with type information following it' and "interface is a block keyword with type information inside that block". That's pretty much the entirety of the proposal: it doesn't state what that type information is (just parsing limits on what it could not be so that it doesn't blow up language parsing), what it is used for (other than that the general idea at runtime is that type annotations are comments just like existing jsdoc comments), or who uses it. While the proposal is trying to stay syntax compatible (again, not types compatible because the proposal doesn't include types) with Typescript it also points out existing overlaps with Closure and Flow type syntaxes and is built so that both of those can use the new syntax for their own, different type systems.

This is why it is a Python-inspired proposal: Python didn't define types, Python defined "here's some places in the language that are effectively ignored like comments that type systems are expected to use". Python has made them more than "just" comments in later proposals and TC-39 holds the right to do that for ES/JS in the future but the current proposal stops about where Python's first proposal did at "types are just fancy inline comments for compilers like (but not limited to) Typescript/Closure/Flow".

Again the proposal itself is a really good read for specifics of where it looks like Typescript and what parts of Typescript are intentionally not supported. For instance as a good reminder there are only three (!) features of Typescript left that aren't ES-standardized and generate code: enums, namespaces, and class parameter properties. Of those, both enums and namespaces have been marked deprecated for a long time and many lint rules exist to help eliminate them from your code if you are still using them.
Giving money as charity doesn't help either. ask Bono.

Capital expensive projects like SpaceX require lot of money and wouldn't be possible by a group of 1000 individuals putting 1m into the bucket. Too many cooks.
What are the downsides of applying?

I haven't dug into the process yet, but it seems like a worthy exercise in clarifying your own thoughts and gaining feedback, even if nothing comes out of it.
The essential problem with spam is that it's so cheap to send it out that it might as well be free. This applies to both "I am a representative of the UN and want to send you $14 million"-type of "scam spam" as well as "you bought something years ago and now we'll spam you" type of "corporate spam".

So basically: it doesn't hurt to try.