skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The fact that the poster focuses on the term ("leftism") rather than on the substance is itself a red flag imo. It puts the discussion on a weird tripolar spectrum: you're either leftist, centrist, or rightwing (of which the poster is likely to posit themselves as a center, to avoid being called biased). I don't think it's terribly productive, and unless the article was calling for Bolshevik Revolution, I don't mind a certain bias. The fallacy here is that it's possible to come in with objective lens--it isn't.
Didn't read the article, did you?
Book barely talks about tools. It wasn't about tools. The epiphany for many was the concept of an error budget and establishing SLOs. Then, basing investment in reliability on data.

That's as applicable today as it was then.
I don’t believe any of the comments below address the meat of your question - what value are you getting from the equation ?

I would answer- not much.

You can think of BS as a curried function. Since all the other params are fixed, you can curry and get a reduced equation that only depends on IV and underlying. If you do that, then its just - you give me iv and underlying, i give you spot. So, for a given strike(fixed), with the prevailing time left(fixed theta) under current interest rate(fixed), given the underlying, the historical vol gives you the wrong spot. You fudge it until you get the right spot. Call the fudged quantity the IV. Now plot that fudged quantity for a few other strikes and you get a smile. Then you can mess with that smile, plot the vol surface etc but end of the day, does the BS equation matter if the price of spot is going to be off and you have to fudge it with IV ? Its a good question. From an operational standpoint, the equation doesn’t matter. You can use bopm and get a more intuitive price anyways. Traders can trade the iv without knowing what effect BS has on the system.

When I was in 5th grade, they took us to the top of a tall building. We dropped a ball and measured the time it took to hit the ground. So if you square that time and multiply by 5, that’s how tall that building is. At that age I thought wow this is such magic!
Then I grew up and reached 8th grade and worked out equations of motion with some basic differential calc, and derived the canonical equation s equals ut plus half at square. So since u is zero and a on planet earth happens to be g which is 9.8, half of which is about 5, that’s why 5t^2.

ok but does this equation matter ? I could have gone my whole life measuring height of buildings without knowing what is gravity.
you might also try Costco if you are in the US. Anecdotally, a friend of mine is a supplier for Costco on the food/beverage side, and told me that they did more diligence than all their other customers combined.

EDIT: you might also just try going direct to small suppliers, a lot wineries also make olive oil

https://winecountrytable.com/travel/other-activities/six-son...
New BMW Art Car Gets Nifty E-Ink That Changes Colors, Shows Animations
Oh, wow. This is pretty different from what I learned in school. Where can I read more about this?
French artists in 1899 envisioned what life would look like in the year 2000
I’m very curious if they can actually empty the un-fused material out of those tiny struts. They said they printed it with a powder bed printer, so voids would be filled with powder unless they can be emptied. I’m curious how that affects weight. I wonder if they used the theoretical empty weight or the actual manufactured weight in their calculations, and how different that makes things.
Driverless cars were always a pipe dream, something to look up to. They basically require an AGI , which we might have soon
PDF available from the Institute's website here: https://www.rose-hulman.edu/~bryan/googleFinalVersionFixed.p...

Interesting that Google has added two orders of magnitude to their market cap since going public in 2004.
That's not the whole story though. Often, what is more important is how stable the oil is below the smoke point. There's a pretty decent video on this by Adam Ragusea: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_aFHrzSBrM
We loved Yahoo! Pipes. While there are some similarities, the product has matured far beyond the original vision of Pipes. I encourage you to check it out as it is free for developers to start out and get a feel for it.
Not exactly the optimal Noctua fan, considering it's a high RPM redux.
So you can trade off 300ms of additional roundtrip time (on anything non-CDNable) at a cost of 3% revenue and reduce your infrastructure complexity a lot
I just feel like they are limiting their user base by only supporting Javascript.

It's of course the de-facto language for interactive display in browsers. The use case for dashboards and data visualisation is clear. But it's an awful language for data science and data analysis, compared to Python or R.
I saw this option as well, but I worry that I might get bots or people who don't open the message to subscribe. So if only 10-20% of readers actually open a given email, then at best 25-50 people can benefit from the free tier, max. I'm looking for something a bit more scalable. The next lowest tier of mailchimp costs $13/mo, which is more than 12x what I pay for all my other hosting + domain name costs combined.
According to DS9, the Bell Riots are supposed to break out this September.

This actually seems kind of plausible.
Which is safer:

1. having several crew members half-way down the aisle of the main cabin with a heavy drinks cart when the expected turbulence hits, or;

2. delivering a single drink by hand to someone who paid extra for that level of service, and where the flight crew can be strapped down within a minute should turbulence start?

It's not like turbulence predictions are 100% correct.

This link seems more designed to spread outrage than be informative. Are American flights often not serving drinks these days? Are the profits from beer/wine sales in the main cabin not enough? Or is this a one-time thing misinterpreted as a personal affront?
Not perfect, but a pretty good resource. I referenced this a lot while developing a USB device
driver and a USB stack on the device side.
I have no idea what numbers you are talking about. Progressives’s profit margins are 4% to 8% outside of 2018 to 2021. Currently under 5%.

And dividends/buybacks have nothing to do with profit margin. Those are not expenses, so that money is included in profit (aka net income). From which profit margin is calculated.

Revenue - expenses = profit.

Profit / revenue = profit margin.

Which is the same as net income / revenue = net (profit) margin
https://requestbin.com clone?
Don, thank you for the trip down memory lane! I had forgotten about the "1802 instructions".

I like that John Draper Repellent idea. You don't even have to smoke it, just the sight of the Evil Weed should do the trick.
This doesn't give people the option to unsubscribe though, right?
I know someone that bought an AMD CPU but it was a factory-sealed empty box. Turned out sending out a cooler-free product in the same packaging allowed for the CPU to be taken out of the box's window without breaking the seal. Hopefully they've updated the packaging.
When I say it's easy to move between clouds, I'm not referring to an org needing to pick up everything and move from AWS to GCP. That is rare, and takes quite a bit of rearchitecting no matter what.

When I say something is easy to move, I mean that when I build on top of it, it's easy for users to run it in their cloud of choice with changes in config. It also means I have flexibility with where I choose to run something after I've developed it. For example I develop most stuff against minikube, then deploy it to GCP or a local production k8s. If I was using Terraform I couldn't do that.
The people who dislike kubernetes are, in my experience, people who don’t need to do all of the things kubernetes does. If you just need to run an application, it’s not what you want.
Nowhere in my comment did I imply that everyone thinks this way, or that op specifically thinks this way.
"photoS"

Anyone know where to find them?
Related quote from E.W. Dijkstra:

"It is practically impossible to teach good programming style to students that have had prior exposure to BASIC; as potential programmers they are mentally mutilated beyond hope of regeneration."
Yea but it just sucks to use
that makes sense; i had seen forth printed that way but had forgotten about it. i think the code was printed side by side with the shadow screens (the comments), requiring 132 columns (4 of padding i suppose)

i think that, if you want to put the metadata into multiple blocks, you need to have some control over the order of buffer saving. one way to do this would be to have two copies of the metadata that you alternate between, which would be desirable anyway in case of power loss during metadata writes. maybe once every 30 seconds, say. after your last modification to replica tweedledee and before your first modification to replica tweedledum, you would call save-buffers, ensuring that briefly tweedledee is also consistent on disk (tweedledum already having been consistent), even if buffer evictions later put tweedledee into a torn state

then the question is how, upon startup, to know whether to use tweedledee or tweedledum? maybe an update serial number at the beginning and end of the block that has to match?

using a cluster size larger than the forth block size seems like it might complicate the calling interface somewhat

glad to hear from you!
Related. Others?

The $25B eigenvector (2006) [pdf] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16091646 - Jan 2018 (68 comments)
An easy tell is "level of effort given context"
Given the title, should the URL not be: https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/programs/2024/organizati...
What the heck are you talking about? Olive oil is perfectly fine for cooking. Not everything needs high temp and fast searing. The smoke point of olive oil is plenty high for tons of sauteing applications.
Are they incompetent or just aren't even trying? I ask myself this question all the time.
>It's of course the de-facto language for interactive display in browsers

This is it, more or less.

It is far, far easier to build an app like this where you want a plethora of users as a web application than a native one, for instance.

For anything JavaScript as a runtime / language is missing, WASM can boost as well. For math and data science, WASM is a natural choice for any missing pieces
I think that's true with the JVM, but the fastest Java solutions are using GraalVM and its ahead-of-time compilation mode to avoid startup time. In addition, while "go run" might take 149ms to compile and run a program, a compiled Go program starts in just a couple of milliseconds:

$ time ./t
Hello, world

real 0m0.003s
If its okay, may i ask what exact sensitivity do you have?
The joke is the juxtaposition of a gun that fires in both directions supposedly not being a metaphor for C and Unix.
> There’s a straight line between this, to Syria, to the immigrant crisis in Europe.

Syria was a result of the Arab Spring, people were fed up with Assad, and instead of supporting the opposition Obama didn't care about any "red lines" and eventually Russia moved in.

Iraq, I partially agree - had the West actually done something to mediate the old conflicts, to provide the people with a source of income, or to prosecute corruption, the country would have had a way better run.

The entire Arab Spring's handling by the West was madness. We could have helped actual, legitimate democracy grow on the foundations of the fed-up masses in the region, by providing aid and assistance as well as act as an oversight authority to keep corruption and crime in check, but no, we just looked the other way as many thousands were killed or tortured, and eventually the old elites took power again - and the "soft power", the prestige the US enjoyed, all went down the drain, with the final nail in the coffin being the handling of the Kurds in Syria.
Don't be sorry, that's interesting stuff. I stand corrected.
It would be a much better world if we could get rid of rentierism.
> This overblown flexibility is what leads to most of the pain and perceived complexity, IMO.

Huh, I guess you are spot on. My first experience with kubernetes was k3s and I couldn't for a long time figure out what's all the fuss is about and where is all that complexity people talk so much about. But then I tried vanilla kubernetes.
You're taking the key crux of the argument, whether ShotSpotter works, as just a given. Just straight up begging the question.
Where is the mention of Tom Baker's Dr. Who inventing Clojure?
Safety Shouldn't Be Opt-In
>Are there 1000 Nepali villages who have asked for a school and the local community thinks that’s what they’re really short on?

Quite likely. Certainly if you include other developing countries, as well as Nepal.

There are small communities in Nepal that get very little help from the central government. Also much work still to be done to repair damage from the last earthquake, especially outside the tourist areas.

>Most development programs like this are donations to westerners to have exotic experiences that end up providing very little value to the communities they purport to help.

Many of them are. However there are organizations like https://thejunipertrust.org that spend 98% of donations helping the intended recipients. Also they employ local to do the work. Which means money goes into the community which also makes the local community more invested in the project.

I understand GiveDirectly is also an excellent charity. But (egotistically) it is nice to be able to point at a picture of a school and think 'I did that' (or, at least, financed it).
How many of these 1 billion users actually need support? Only a tiny fraction.
This app is essential if you're travelling in places with poor reception. Especially since Apple Maps do not work offline. Before you write your response telling me I'm wrong, put your telephone in airplane mode and try searching for a place in Apple Maps. You can't, it shows you a fake search field.
Well, I think the preface leads with this statement, which does seem to indicate a fundamental bias in the thesis that’s overly political:

Second, AI is used to disproportionately benefit the privileged while worsening inequality.

The article talks a lot about the challenges of care delivery and how there appears to be systemic breakdowns in how patients are listened to and how demographics seems to lead to worse outcomes. These are all serious issues. It further states essentially that AI, at least learning based AI, learns what it is trained with and most training data indirectly encodes the various social biases that influence the data collection or what is collected in the data. The is true too.

However neither of these have to do with AI curing cancer. They seem more statements that AI won’t solve all social ills, which is absolutely true. But these don’t speak to given a positive cancer diagnosis can AI provide a route to curing an individuals cancer. I suspect the answer is “maybe,” but none of the social and political points made are why. It’s because cancer is very complex and we need a vector that AI can generate some solution in to treat any specific cancer. Since there are many many types of cancer and many many variants of those types, as well as per individual cancer genetic variability, it seems unlikely “AI will cure cancer,” but I think it’s very likely AI will make cancer treatment much more personalized, discover many new therapeutic agents, and accelerate human driven research. It is already used in generic immunotherapy, mRNA design, and other treatments. As tools and techniques become better, as well as our understanding of how to apply it, AI will help a lot.
> their turbo clocks/voltages aren't sustainable with most cooling solutions

And also, starting with 7nm it becomes a lot harder to transfer that heat out of the chip, even if you have thermal mass. The IHS itself becomes a bottleneck.

On X3D chips it gets even worse, as the cache acts as a heat shield too - these chips actually are pre-binned running at relatively low voltages, which is why they usually don't see as huge gains in as others in curve optimizer.
One of the neat new features of Observable Framework is you can drop in a build script to gather the data that's written in any language you like. https://observablehq.com/framework/loaders

So you absolutely can do the data processing step in R or Python and have that output JSON or CSV which is then visualized at the end using JavaScript.

Not a small feature, but I bet it would be possible to use WebAssembly to add support for Markdown blocks that get executed in other languages as well, using Pyodide for Python for example.
Olive oil is great for cooking as long as you keep it below its temperature, 170 degrees celsius. I use a fancy IR thermometer because I'm a nerd.

"during frying olive oil behavior is usually equal or superior to that of refined vegetable oils"
https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1541-433...

"olive oil, independently of its category label, is clearly resistant to degradation under domestic frying conditions (170 °C). Among the olive oil categories, the extra-virgin PDO olive oil was more resistant under the conditions of this study"
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S02786...
The Syrian civil war was cross-border. ISIS held a large chunk of Iraq at one point. I doubt it’d have lasted as long as it has if that hadn’t been a factor (and the US deliberately making it last longer but not acting decisively enough to end it in victory for “our” side, but that’s a separate matter)
> It's easy to end up writing code that's got good algorithmic time complexity, but where the CPU spends its time sitting cold and waiting on RAM

It’s been interesting preparing for coding interviews. Quite a few times, the “optimal” solution time-complexity wise, is slower than the brute force solution

Many of those it’s because of the inputs. If you know what they are or what their order distribution is going to be, you can usually do quite a lot better than the naive “ideal” solution
It's the version most people use, so of course it's not "meaningless".
Not every business is based on impulse buys. Amazon is a pretty biased sample there.
I was a sysadmin (at uni, in the early 2000s) and I am an SRE today (at Google).

The two jobs are nothing alike, at all, whatsoever.

Sysadmins are support roles. Their functional role is to provide a healthy substrate to run the application layer on top of.

SREs work at the application layer itself. If the system can't scale due to internal architecture, an SRE would be expected to propose a new, scalable design. That would be in addition to maintaining the substrate.

To be clear, there is also nothing inferior about performing a support role. No org can succeed without support.

But the two roles are not the same, and if a job's set of responsibilities don't include shared ownership over application layer architecture, then it can be a great job but it's not an SRE role.
I'd like to play Zork e.a. while the map gets auto-generated in an adjacent window as I play.

I'm pretty sure I've seen this auto-mapping software some years ago. Can anybody point me in the right direction?

Edit: it’s not in this list: https://www.ifarchive.org/indexes/if-archive/mapping-tools/
colo racks, rented dedicated servers, ec2 / managed vm offerings?
The GP comment may have been bad or wrong, but it didn't break the site guidelines as far as I can tell.

We need you (i.e. everyone commenting here) to follow HN's rules regardless of how badly other people's posts are. Moderation is inevitably inconsistent because we can't see everything; not even in the same thread.
Olive oil is commonly cut with other oils to the point that you have repeatedly run into health problems as a result of food fraud? I knew it was common, but that is basically at the point of routine.
Just FYI: Fischer ... not Fisher.
Organic Maps gives me peace of mind that in case cellular networks are down, I can find my way around.
I'll reiterate what I wrote before:

042€/hour per hour of compute is a great deal for developers. If you tests with cross compilation and qemu anyways and sometimes needs test/benchmark on the native hardware, then this means you can spend about 5€ and you are probably set for months if not a year.

Also, with the latest gcc you can finally target rvv 0.7.1, which is supported by these CPUs. You just write your standardized rvv 1.0 intrinsics and if you add `-march=64gcxtheadvector` gcc 14 will just generate the equivalent rvv 0.7.1: https://godbolt.org/z/va9sfEnMW
That's because a vast majority of the set of grammatically correct n-grams are not actually useful in practical language. "Colorless green ideas sleep furiously" is valid English, but it is semantically nonsense.
> But knowing what needs to be optimized doesn't necessarily mean you know how to optimize it.

True, although not knowing what needs to be optimized guarantees that you don't know how to optimize it :).

> knowing more about how to actually write optimized code can help you make more informed decisions earlier on in the development process.

Totally agree though, despite poking a bit of fun.

This is something that I've been decently good at for many years. If I had to give someone new to it advice, it'd be:

- learn how to repeatably measure your system without introducing too much overhead. If you get this wrong, you're going to end up tricking yourself into believing you've made an improvement but instead got lucky/unlucky.

- once you've found the repeatably-measureable hotspots, the optimization approach is going to depend dramatically on the problem domain. Optimizing for database disk throughput is different than optimizing for http server response-latency is different than squeezing more polygons into a frame in a game.

The one very important thing to keep in mind though is that you're going to need to peel back the abstractions and understand what's happening under the hood. This applies to both parts. Maybe the way to measure what's happening in your network service is to use tcpdump to capture the raw packets and see that you're sending a bunch of small writes into a socket instead of a single big write (why is that a problem? :D). Or something like NVidia NSight can provide a ton of insight into what's happening on your CPUs and GPU frame-to-frame.
spicyboros-7b-2.2.Q5_K_M.gguf: https://i.imgur.com/BeNcRl4.png
Or merely that it'll be used to accelerate what we can already do to the point that it's revolutionary. Other computer advances have done the same, like the ability to finally create Folding@Home at a level that it'd matter.

It's easy to say "X will do Y" when X is a force multiplier for things we already do.

The fact that it could also come up with new ideas is a bonus on top of that, making it even easier to say.
> Shouldn't be too hard to do even with pen and paper since the 2-adic eval of 52! is large.

Could you elaborate?
I was expanding on your point, not disagreeing with it.
TJ's chicken soup dumplings recalled for potential permanent marker plastic