skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
We already have car centric suburbia and its going to take decades to change that. We might as well switch to electric cars which are quieter and produce less air pollution rather than wait for thousands of homes to be rebuilt.
Amazon lobbyists would still be allowed if they followed their end of the deal: show up when it was required to attend regarding working conditions. They didn't so yes, it flies.

In the US due process is also rife with corruption, a layered form where if you have enough money to pay a stellar legal team you'll find loopholes and appeals processes to massage your way through.
> you pay based on your actual usage

The disagreement is on what "usage" means. I wouldn't assume that "usage" includes things that don't take any action on my part.

If I don't use my phone, for example, I wouldn't get any "usage". A phone pay-as-you-go plan would probably trigger similar outrage if they charged you potentially unlimited amounts for phone calls that hit your voicemail overnight.
I have just released supporting local CSV file as a source in v0.1.3, let me know if this helps! :)
I suppose you also like a cluttered house.

My biggest peeve with ads is that you have to search a page for the stuff you want. Much better to have a page which is all information with no extraneous crap.

Maybe if advertisers were limited to a maximum of 5% of page area, it might be acceptable. But I doubt that would ever happen. So I continue with an adblocker.
Duplicate of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39528134
One very simple explanation I’ve read is that time perception (as time itself) is relative. Time goes slower when you are a child because your perception of time is relative to the totality of time you’ve experienced.

So for instance, when you go from 1 to 2yrs old, it’s double the amount of your entire life, but from 80 to 81 it’s just a small fraction.

Not sure if this has been proven or is even possible to prove.
[dupe]

More discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39530203
Fired people for less than what?

What part of it is confidential? Its existence? Obviously not. The fact that it uses SLAM? Not confidential, of course it does. That a person was transferred from that to the Vision Pro? Probably also on their linkedin page.

Nothing that OP described this person as saying sounds "stupid" or confidential. Sure, maybe they also said something that was confidential in addition to what was described. Maybe they also insulted your mother. We don't know.
For the keys to be considered to fall under the DCMA, they'd have to be copyrighted.
BTW Musk is the guy who thinks that if one man with a plough can't produce enough food in his field, we need more men with more ploughs instead of just one man with a tractor.

Or how do you explain his desire for a growing population?

The concept of increasing productivity seems to be foreign to him in this context.
The problem is that it's an awful lot of work for everyone to decide for themselves, and I don't think the average user is going to care enough to build their own moderation algorithm. They'll just complain and move on
You’re wrong. All of these languages are considered memory safe.
More discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39530203
Bleem won in that case (but ran out of funds), so it's useful for the defendant.

If Nintendo loses, the next defendant would have even more precedence.

If Nintendo wins, it's easier to go after future emulator projects.
it's on my roadmap for sure!
I can start a CLI as a separate process. But ingesting to CSV and then reading the CSV would be slow. Maybe it would be better to ingest into DuckDB or in memory in Arrow memory format. If anyone has any other suggestions, I am all ears.
From my past discussions with car executives (that are ~10 years old so grain of salt), I really do think it’s as simple as that recurring infotainment subscription revenue.

The small margin GM gets on its cars is buffered by the revenue splits it gets with Sirius XM and the various call for assistance services. Sirius revenue is on the decline because everyone listens to Spotify on their phone. The GPS revenue stream died with Google Maps on phones. So they have to try to lock in those fees where they can. See also: BMW selling a subscription to unlock features like heated seats.

Now, I think this backfires for GM. I think way more people will not buy new cars if they lack Android Auto or Car Play than they think. I also think that it will be harder to maintain the apps and services than GM thinks. When Ford was doing its partnership with Microsoft 15 years ago (and then they took it in-house because Microsoft Connect or whatever it was called was buggy as hell), I think that made a lot of sense. But it was also expensive to do and so you saw the car companies offload a lot of those details to Apple and Google via a QNX or other middleware layer. Tesla built its own software as sort of a foundational part of the car experience, and I think it has worked well for them. I don’t have the same confidence in GM.

The thing is, if GM just made a $30 a month connected car subscription package to unlock Car Play and 5G assistance or whatever, I think they’d sell tons of it. People would complain but I know that I would pay the money in a second versus trying to pair my phone with a non-Car Play infotainment system. But I bet Apple and Google would insist on 30% of that revenue (at least).
I'd recommend taking the fake testimonials off the site.
I see that the handful of Ellipsis "buddies" here are upvoting your post. :)

CodeRabbit employees wouldn't usually be commenting here to spoil your "moment," but this reply is entirely wrong on so many levels. The fact is that CR is much further along the traction (several hundred paying customers and thousands of GitHub app installs) and product quality. Most of the CR clones are just copying the CR UX (and it's OSS prompts) at this point, including Ellipsis. The chat feature at CR is also pretty advanced - it even comes with a sandbox environment to execute AI-generated shell commands that help it deep dive into the codebase.

Again, I am sorry that we had to push back on this reply; we usually don't respond to competitors - but this statement was plain wrong, so we had to flag it.
FWIW, I am relatively certain a good chunk of HN users are marked as "mostly harmless" already. In other words, we are all on the list. We just have different tags:D

edit: Or at least, if I was responsible for running IC, we would all be on the list with appropriate tags. Thankfully, I am not.
Show HN: Music Quiz web app powered by Spotify API
Built with Next.js, Tailwind, TypeScript
thanks a lot for your comment, glad to hear we converged on a similar idea! :)
> A corporation is not required to kill for profit.

Some corporations aren't in a situation where killing people is profitable.

But every corporation will come across situations where harming people is profitable, and if they don't harm people in that situation, one of their competitors will.

People like Yvonne Chounard who manage to avoid unethical practices AND create a profitable company are the exception, not the rule, and he was aware of that, which is why he went to great lengths creating an atypical corporate management structure to try to preserve the ethics of Patagonia in his absence.

> Doctors would kill for profit. Politicians would. The same for engineers, cookers. Any profession, activity or line of business really.

> That's human nature. But not all humans. Not even majority, I'd say certainly.

You're fundamentally not understanding what I'm saying.

It's not the doctors I'm worried about. Doctors have to look their patients in the eye usually.

It's not the cooks I'm worried about, because they're generally poor, and don't have the means to avoid regulation.

It's not the engineers I'm worried about, because they generally don't get paid more if their work kills people (with the exception of those in the manufacturing of weapons). In fact, it's often engineers that are the whistleblowers saying "we told them what was wrong and they did it anyway" when the decision is made to do something dangerous.

And if you think the majority of politicians won't kill to keep power, please tell me what country you are in so I can move there. I can only think of a handful of elected politicians at the federal US level who aren't obvious de-facto murderers.

The people I'm worried about the most are the C-level execs, board members, and majority shareholders: the kind of people who can put a numerical value on what it will cost to not kill people, and then justify it to themselves and never have to look their victims or their victims' families in the eye.
Which mysteriously only affected the US -- while the Toyota's remained extremely safe cars there.
Democracy will ensure that democracy remains as the governing method.

Also, try building a bridge between two cities across from each other with direct democracy.
This is true, but most big AI companies are the ones selling shovels, and tons of money is pouring into the field because everyone wants to get in on shovel selling... but I don't know if it's yet determined that there are enough motivated shovel buyers.
This is bullshit.

Let's repeat the basic fact: every crypto which uses a transaction fee is inherently a scam because it's a negative sum game. Everything else is bait to get you involved in the scam. There's nothing else.
Write a letter to your congress-person. Laws can say whatever they want them to say.
I certainly hope not. Microsoft under Satya has turned Windows into blatant spyware/adware.
How can Apple products be status items when over 60% of smartphones in the US are iPhones? Is Coca-Cola a status item? Is it possible that they're just good products that deliver good value to the majority of people who buy them? Is a $1300 Galaxy S24 Ultra not a status item?
Specifically, function coloring (C# and Rust in your examples) is not the same as coroutines in Go or virtual threads in Java.
The possibility of segfaults is kind of a given though. I mean the whole point of foreign interfaces is to reuse existing C code. The pinning functions just expose the manual C resource management that programmers would have to deal with if they were writing C. You just turn off the automatic resource management for the objects involved so you can do it yourself, running the risk of leaking those resources.

The only viable way to escape all this is to rewrite the software in the host language. A worthy goal but I don't see anyone signing up for that herculean task outside the Rust community.
I don't follow. Why would anti-ESG folks be against an Apple car?
That 3x3m project shown is not realistic. Not for a newbie and probably not easy to keep from falling apart for an expert.

But yes, wild hedgewoods of a mix of useful shrubs are totally doable even in really small spaces. I had designed a few. They are low maintenance, beautiful, useful, funny, and tasty and everybody should have space for one of this wildlife lifesavers in their gardens.
> Personally I think that Caddy v1 configuration was a little bit nicer than the current versions

In what way? Caddy v1 config was very inflexible, so there were lots of things that were simply impossible to do with it. I think we struck a good balance of simplicity to expressiveness.
From now on they'll be known as the "Hype" team: working on whatever technology is hyped at the moment.
I hope Nintendo loses because it would be extremely harmful to emulation and software freedom as a whole if they didn't, but at the same time, I hope this knocks the whole "for-profit emulator" practice down a peg for a while. I think this is the same emulator that at one point tried asking people to pay a monthly subscription to play online.
I know this is beating a dead horse at this point, but the "key element" missing is not safety culture, it's accountability: people need to start facing real jail time for all the deaths they've caused.

None of this distributed blame horseshit.

Downstream will fall in place once the correct incentives are in place.
I can't help but think of Sears and all their decisions that probably made "good business sense".
The focus on making lots of prototypes reduces cost. They streamline the largest and most expensive manufacturing bottlenecks.

Each Starship has 30+ engines required per flight and tons of precision welding. All of it can now be made in a month. That means massive cost savings going forward, the faster each can be made
Running Ruby on Rails in the browser using WASM
https://archive.ph/meOGZ
The customer just probably takes on more debt
Nope, just seen it in action over and over.

No one thought they would do VR and they did.

No one thought they would compete with Netflix and their movies are winning awards now.

No one thought they would cannibalize the iPod with a phone and they did.

The state of US tech companies is that they will also go into new markets. When Netflix came out, did you really think Amazon and Apple would get into that market? To Apple, cars are an untapped sector they'll want to tackle when their existing sectors are saturated.
Downloading entire ROM collections quickly becomes too much data for local storage, starting with Saturn/PS1 and escalating from there.
OSC8-Adoption: List of terminal emulators that support hyperlinks
>Does Nintendo benefit that much from the sales of the Switch hardware? It just all seems so wasteful given that every computer is basically the same nowadays.

Yes? They have a closed down system that they market as family friendly and can be quickly docked to a tv or taken on the go. It's a device that didn't really exist at the time; its potential competitors in 2017 were Chinese hardware charging 2-3 times the price. The market and uniqueness is there.

And on top of all of that, selling hardware is also profitable, on top of software. Why wouldn't they benefit in this situation?
This is not the question Apple is trying to answer.

If you're trying to expand the market of a company with such a broad reach already there aren't many markets big enough to move the needle on revenue. Real-estate, food, fashion and automotive are the only ones really significant enough to tackle, and of those, automotive isn't an unreasonable one to explore.

Unless you want a literal Apple Home.
It's just very convenient that big corporations have money in their budget to massively spend on lobbyists while citizens' associations do not.

> "The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal loaves of bread."
This sets off my BS sensors fairly strongly, maybe because of how dogmatic the assertions are compared to how little supporting content there is.

Mind you, that doesn't say it's wrong. It just says that if you want me to take it seriously, you need to give me more than this.
Surge pricing should be known as "surprise billing". Because the next step after getting consumers to accept that is to play lots of games with nondisclosure of price.
except that mass public transportation is never going to happen on the needed scale in the US; electric cars is the next best thing and much preferable to the current status quo
Generally there is a flip every 2-3 terms between the liberals and conservatives. It is also common for Ontario and the federal government to have opposing parties. If the conservatives win the federal election next year expect Ontario to elect a liberal government next.
They need to use the password manager. They need to be able to access accounts without you. If it is one that they can't use, then you need to find one they can. Also, that is reducing the burden on you. Do they ask you to login to things?
Reality is a lot more weird than satire.
I for one have exclusively used yuzu to play backups of games I legally purchased on a computer that can render them with higher frame-rates and quality than official switch hardware.

This is my legal right, and Yuzu provided open source code to make this task easier for me.

Nintendo is looking for a scapegoat here for their wasted investment in DRM technology.
I agree with this. The main aspect in which they've lost their way in my mind is that their product design choices are intended to appeal to customers only as means to profit, rather than choices that earn profit as a side effect of delighting customers. For example, they've developed this incessant habit of trying to remove basic and often loved features in order to save a buck (ports, headphone jacks, mag-safe cables, glare-free screens, escape keys and other buttons, etc).
If this happened to me, joke would be on them, I'm grandfathered in with no credit card details attached to my file. Still, I had a mild panic attack reading this and am now thinking I shouldn't use them anymore.
So can companies of leaved PC games sue nvidia or windows?
Lobbying is not "the rich". It's large economic sectors that account for many jobs and economic activity. It is right that they be allowed to make their views and interests known in a transparent way. They will anyway as they have the resources and contacts, so we might as well have an official, transparent channel.
For better or worse, the answer to your question is in the header of the Wikipedia page you linked.
> Liberalism has successfully faced down many opponents over the past four centuries. Reactionary monarchism, colonial imperialism, fascism, and communism (or at least, the 20th century variety) all fell by the wayside, and I’m pretty sure Islamism is in the process of doing so as well.

This seems to using the word 'liberalism' to describe all the ideas from the Early Modern Period to the progressive present day that persist in the contemporary West. Is this how Americans perceive liberalism?

Context: I'm an Australian who lives in the UK, so my understanding of liberalism is an economic theory that originated in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, and became associated with specific social reforms relating to the cultural beliefs of the middle class (in the pre-WWI sense of the term).

> Hitler would have certainly liked to do this — he certainly tried to get ethnic Germans on his side when he took over neighboring countries — but he lacked the technology and the global economic reach to bend German Americans to his will, so he didn’t even try.

An awful lot of Germans in other parts of the world supported the Nazis without needing special encouragement.

> The liberal principle of sovereign national borders is at stake, as is the liberal belief that nationhood and citizenship matter more than race.

Again, this doesn't sound like liberalism, but rather the idea of the State that originated with the Treaty of Westphalia.

Overall, I agree with the conclusions, but there's a curious America-centred-end-of-history feel to many of the arguments.
I’d love to discuss contributing further. Do you have a link to a GitHub repository or organization?
No-one in the comments there seems to have twigged that OBEAh is simultaneously a hex address and a word for JuJu, magic. Which I suppose is appropriate in the context of a tribal initiation?
Extrapolating from my own case time seems to have doubled in speed from 5 to in my 30's, if that doubles when im 70, then when im 100 it's 8 times as fast, wow.

I wonder what that would mean for life extension, imagine this exponential - then you'll get very little effect from living past 200 years:

https://imgur.com/crLQUy6

Pretty interesting thought experiment.
You might need a teacher. Biking is all endurance, piano involves a bit more.
They’re talking about things like this:

https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-features/osc...

Or what I wrote in my other comment:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39530386

The example you give may have some problem driving it. Likewise, all the shows and channels whose cast are almost all black, Latino, women, LGBT, etc. It’s also possible the roles just went to whoever they’re around the most or showed up. I’ve also been in groups that were mostly white who invited countless non-whites to visit or join. They just never did for who knows what reason.

All that said, it’s anecdotal evidence. What’s more concrete is the huge number of companies, plus awards like Oscars, changing their criteria to require hiring non-whites, non-males, and non-straights. One criteria required the plot be designed to promote that group’s politics which often happens. The Mother being the last one I saw like that and director turned out to do movies to push feminism. Also, who you have sex with used to be irrelevant to hiring. Now, liberals reward LGBT practices with jobs and movie roles.

They’re definitely doing it. They don’t have to but are just backing those like them. Their ideological partners in groups they favor. The way human corruption and sin has always worked, eh?
Thank you for the tip! Will add.
js2-mode was the coolest major mode for Emacs back in the day. The js2 parser is primitive, non-incremental and language-specific.

semantic-mode almost, a-a-a-lmost did something similar (mostly based on LR incremental parsing) but was Emacs-only and never gained enough traction.

Tree-sitter is decades ahead of both. It's hard to compare js2 to a modern GLR incremental parser generator of Tree-sitter. I am not even talking about the size of the community building grammars useful in all the editors out there.
I see nothing in the article that suggests Lina Khan claiming that the FTC blocked, or even played a role in blocking, the NVIDIA-ARM merger.

To the extent the headline is making all the commenters here believe that to be the case the headline is clearly incorrect.

Here’s what Lina Khan actually says.

> Khan said that when the $40 billion merger was called off due to “significant regulatory challenges” in 2022, it forced both companies to innovate and create new products.

> “The trajectories of both companies in the wake of this action has illustrated how organic growth and competition can spur firms to further innovate in ways that benefit the business and public alike,” Khan said at the conference.

> The evidence, Khan said, is in the company stock prices.

> “Not only has Nvidia remained the leading AI chipmaker in the AI chip arms race, with a surging stock valuation, but Arm ended up going public and has a forward earnings multiple that is more than double Nvidia’s,” Khan said.

Lina Khan is clearly making the case that regulatory action is actually good for investors and not claiming any sort of credit to the FTC specifically.

What all these comments here only go to show is how few people actually read the articles before commenting on the headlines.
I'm assuming your phone died before finishing this comment, thus proving your point.
I actually have adblocker off on Google because I'm curious who pays for ads :D
You’re right that there is a challenge about giving attention when that’s what they’re seeking. I generally prefer either flagging (worse cases) or up-voting the one person who left a “dude, not cool” reply so they get clear community feedback.
I guess I’ll have to fall back on my oversized genitals
That's a strange thought.

Neither the name or logo of famous car brands got associated or tarnished by tens of thousands killed every year...

Even when some of them ocassionally made a specific "death trap" model or production run, that's simply not how people thinks of them.
With apologies for the pedantry, they didn't make it _infinitely_ worse. They may have made it _significantly_ worse.
You're right, but nit: Playstation is about 40% of Sony income. They can survive without PS, but it'd be a big hit losing that much of their market.
maybe it's the other way around? other companies started to up level during covid and hiring mania?
They have historically rarely been first at anything
Why the Future of Cloud Deployments Is Unikernels (2023)
also: https://unikraft.org/docs/concepts