skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Exactly, before you go to open source, take a hard look at

* why I am doing that

* plethora of burned-out maintainers and their posts

* how I am going to deal with the issues/PRs, toxic entitlement

* what's my exit strategy

The first thing before you go into open source (provided it's actually used open source) is to answer these questions honestly for yourself. Because it's massive time sink with no money and *there will never be money* (unless you go open core or your employer pays you, in that case that's just a job just like any other).
I can guarantee you that “ingesting a nut” through the engine is not part of the official engine qual program. Maybe it happened once and somehow the engine survived and they were able to ascertain what had happened. But this is not a common thing.

Edit: I will say that what actually is a test commonly done (also in industry in general) is doing a “roll test”. They put the stages on these massive rollers and slowly turn them… listening for any “clinks”. Pretty funny seeing it done.
> Even if it takes a thousand tries, that means one out of thousand users would get it.

If they use that particular prompt that primes the model for regurgitation.

It's not one in a thousand of regular queries.
Come up with a different measurement for good that is equally wanted and fungible
there was another website which shows whole movie in a single frame as averaged bars of colors.

UPDATE:

There is Moviebarcode https://moviebarcode.tumblr.com/

There is https://www.jasonshulmanstudio.com/photographs-of-films which just puts all frames on top of each other
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39523957
> One is that (glancing through the comments) they're actually significantly more thorough than what is already there and they're at the level of thoroughness that a new user may actually want.

Consider this real example from the pull request:

/**
* Returns the plugin version property.
* @return the plugin version property
*/
@Input
public Property<String> getPluginVersion() {
return this.pluginVersion;

To me this seems less like a useful comment, and more like a joke trying to highlight the absurdity of aiming for complete javadoc coverage.
That's like saying kids should not learn to write because all the
important books have now been written.

It's not about whether "programming is no longer a vital skill". It's
that programming is socially and politically empowering knowledge, so
that kids don't have to meekly accept the walls of an AI -powered
"World Government" run by the likes of Jensen Huang.
Non-reactive usually implies forever chemical.
The Mysterious AVP Cracks on Apple Vision Pros
Apple Vision Pro owners are experiencing mysterious cracks. The issue was first reported by MacRumours and it indicates that the cracks appeared suddenly for no apparent reason.

Read more... Link
I'll piggyback this sci-fi thread to link the beginning of Phase IV, because I rather like it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTv4WYHsncQ

The plot: "After a spectacular and mysterious cosmic event, ants of different species undergo rapid evolution, develop a cross-species hive mind, and build seven strange towers with geometrically perfect designs in the Arizona desert."
Deploying Web Apps with Caddy: A Beginner's Guide Caddy
It's so long because it has a space for up to 10 crypto facilities, with 2 pages per facility.

So basically 10 questions that need to be answered for a company that has a single crypto facility. And since power is such a large part of costs, I'd be surprised if most don't already know the answers to the power questions.
Did they retrofit the linesets through the walls to the interior units?

Or do you have existing ductwork (which a house with hydronic gas heat probably does not have, or else they'd probably not be asking the question)?
If OP is here, your code block has some html characters double-encoded (&gt; and co).

----

Can someone double check my understanding of something? AWS doesn’t return the failure reason for auth failure on policy mismatch when access is denied, so you can only know your assumption is correct if the request succeeded.

Does that mean that this only works for resources that have been shared publicly by the upstream owner? If I have an AWS bucket and I only generate signed URLs to access the content and otherwise deny access (standard non-public bucket procedure), this attack wouldn’t work since requests to the base resource need to fulfill both the owner and requester policies and even if your requester policy has a prefix match the upstream access policy will deny the request, no?
VCs also incur risk. The only reason you're able to use a computer today is because of VCs.
Why does these articles always leave out how electricity the pump needs and how that varys with temperature? It's not magic or free.
These companies want their cake and they want to eat it, too. They want to be treated as a publisher when it comes to making editorial decisions, but they also want to be treated as a dumb pipe when it comes to liability for the content that they publish. They're Schrödinger's Forums: Both publishers and non-publishers, depending on which one helps them.
The future is bright for the idealized worker who can change their skill set on a dime. Here's something relevant that was posted about moments ago:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39525562
College Basketball: An In-Depth Study of the "Foul Up 3" Dilemma [pdf]
Isn’t it kind of cringe to think these 90% or whatever totally oblivious people are why adtech companies continue to print billions of dollars?
Accidentally I recently looked up when a bunch of trees are, or can be called a forest. Which I learned is minimal 500 square meters.
Also been developing CRUDy apps for 10+ years and would be interested in learning about the steps one would take to make the transition happen.
In context it's clearly not intended to mean that. The quote is: "paid someone to hack OpenAI's products". This is clearly "hack" in the "malicious actor" type of "hack" rather than "Hacker News" type of "hack".
Ah, found it :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malicious_Software_Removal_Too...

> Despite Microsoft ending general support for the Windows 7 operating system in 2020, updates are still provided to Windows 7 users via the standard Windows Update delivery mechanism.

And still are (for now).

Of course :

> MSRT does not offer real-time protection. It scans its host computer for specific, widespread malware, and tries to eliminate the infection.
This might make you feel better...
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/pesticide-in-oat-products-s...

... unless you regularly eat more than 85,000 tons of oats.
How would you incentivize an AI to "work towards" goals universally?
> instead forgiving any bills from legitimate mistakes after the fact

That's terrible for marketing.
The stability and security of energy generation in the US is in fact the DOE's business.
Diverged Branches
> I wonder if this established leader position somehow could make people less optimistic and willing to explore?

The market seems like a bad fit for pro-humanity technology—researchers at least have that (albeit fading) potential in their back pocket.
If something is too slow one of the first things I do after finding out which bit of code is slow is check the algorithm.
It could be worker organization in Europe is mutually cooperative rather than antagonistic as often found in USA.
After reading the article, I really want a bug/ant RTS game.
Consuming more thoughtfully is cool and all, but it's not going to save the climate.
> This is a different category of freedom. Failures of air safety in manufacture, maintenance, and operation can and do kill innocent parties on the ground in crashes and in the air in collisions.

The vast, vast majority of airline deaths are from people who are employees or paying passengers. "This could conceivably hurt a third party" is, when unquantified, a blank check to regulate anything. All activities have non-zero risk to third parties.

> JSX's model was 10 times more likely to be in an accident and 18 times more likely to be fatal than major airlines. This was in line or better than any other year I looked at back to 2008, which is the earliest data the NTSB had.

You're missing the part where you actually quantify the benefit. That involves taking the accident rate, computing an expected chance of death per passenger per flight (or mile or whatever), converting to dollars using the statistical value of life (~$10M in the US), and comparing that number to the ticket price. You'll find that for the major airlines it's <$1 per flight.

Just ask: how would you know when it was no longer worth it to spend more to drive the risk lower? Any argument of the form "this activity is 10x more dangerous than another activity" is incomplete if you don't know what the appropriate level of danger is for the other activity.
Last year I had to replace my HVAC. I was set on getting a heat pump, being a huge fan of efficiency. I was averaging a $1.05/therm delivered for gas, and about 17.5 cents/kwh for electricity delivered. A therm is about 29 kwh, so I pay the equivalent of $5.07/therm in electricity.

The best whole house air-source heat pumps had a SEER2 of 18.5, or a COP of just under 5.0. I need a COP of over 5 to just break even in terms of cost efficiency. So a heat pump would actually cost me more on an ongoing basis. And the price for a heat pump installation was $10k more than a furnace/AC.

I just couldn't do it. To pay more up front and then ongoing was just too much. If you showed me even a super long range projection of saving money, I would have been down for it, but it just was not there.

If I can get solar on my house it may make sense, I will cross that bridge in a few years as my roof is almost end of life, but that has its own headaches as I have limited space (brownstone, flat roof), and am in a historic district.

Next go around, as heat pump tech improves and hopefully gets cheaper, it will probably make sense, but for me right now, it just didn't work.
I went to see a recent swiss comedy film - "Bon schuur Ticino" - and it was hilarious. Granted, a lot of the humour might go over the heads of people who haven't lived in Switzerland, but there's definitely comedy
Perhaps it would be even worse without the parks? This article suggests that variation in temperature across the city does correlate with vegetation cover:

> the Kilburn and South Hampstead area, with 38% vegetation cover, experienced heat over 7°C hotter than Regent’s Park, with 89% vegetation cover, a short distance away.

https://www.pbctoday.co.uk/news/digital-construction-news/bi...
Kudos for how much polish and documentation work you've done here. It's rare to see a v0.1 release that's this accessible to newcomers, even rarer to see it all from one person. You clearly care about developer experience and that makes the project much more inviting.
Add a couple hours for the trip between town and pad, security and so on. Still it's 3-4 hours.
Something Went Terribly Wrong with Online Ads
That shit is their bread and butter, though. They will literally never get rid of it, they've spent the past 5 years doubling down on that, and then doubling down on it again.

Their message is clear: if you don't like it, fuck off.

I have to have one Windows machine for certain shit, and while you can get rid of a lot of the ads only once, certain ones, like in-UI ads for Microsoft Teams, just keep coming back like Terminator. There's no way to get rid of them. At best, you can get rid of this specific version of the ad, but they will add a new "different" one in the next OS update.

But Apple is on their six. My kids recently got old enough to need their own accounts on computers, and it is this hellish whack-a-mole with ads for Apple Music.

Even though I think Apple is about as good as we'll ever get from a for-profit corporation, it's still deplorable. You will never not get ads if you cede control of "your" hardware to some corporate jackasses.
That's why you vote in a government to worry about things for you. There's no reason why individuals should have to worry about stuff like this.
Some of it is practice and training. I was always a "slow programmer" in the short term. Before I ever practiced algorithmic coding I could do say, fizzbuzz and two sum, but it might have taken me a good ten to fifteen minutes to really think it through, write out the code, and identify any bugs.

After I decided to really dive into DS&A and do some interview prep, I really focused on speed and I got so much faster.
Now try that on a random laptop with dedicated GPU.

It isn't as if I never used any other distribution since 1995, in fact I probably have used more in numeric value than the average age of HNers, just to use a random metric.

Hence why my Linux based media devices nowadays are Android and WebOS powered instead, I leave GNU/Linux for servers.
[dupe] Airfoil
How about, for example, delaying content releases until certain funding milestones have been reached? This will act as an incentive for people to pay for the content. If they want it released even earlier, they should pay more?
Likewise. The ambient rooms and post-meeting summaries with ide files, links, and now todos/transcript is super useful! A company like Notion should buy them up. The only missing feature for me is browser participation or a Windows client, but most of my teammates are Mac.
Not that I've read the background materials for that legislation, but what I'd expect is the law as such doesn't have very specific considerations for that, and the implementation for arbitrating the details is not too far removed from what paxys just described?
Depends on whether you're already logged in it seems
Hetzner dedicated servers are (true) unmetered with 1 gbit connection. (can be upgraded).

https://www.hetzner.com/dedicated-rootserver/matrix-ax/

With a 48 core Epyc or 80 core arm server, one really shouldnt need much more for a middling project. There are enterprises who run entire services on such hardware.
The bark and leaves are the primary sources of benzyltetrahydroisoquinolines.
Searchkick: Intelligent Search Made Easy
As gas use declines, prices are likely to stay low. So probably a long time.
Sorry but you seem to be repeating russian war propaganda. The U.S. sabotaging north stream makes zero sense and Russia was already arbitrarily and randomly limiting supply through North stream for months before. That Russia was involved is pretty much fact and established by several western intelligence reports. The only other possible part with a good cause would be Ukraine but they'd be stupid to sabotage the pipeline and alienate all their essential allies.
In Kelvin the percentage difference looks a lot smaller than -20°C to +10°C, more towards a rounding error for an ideal heat pump.

So if they can operate at the same percentage efficiency away from ideal, the extra difference from the actual source/sink temperature could be very minimal right?
That is very valuable to dozens of us (dozens!) who race our cars at Nurnburgring.
They're standard alloys with special process controls. "Aerospace grade" aluminum is commonly just 2024. "Aerospace grade" titanium is often 6Al-4V. What makes them special isn't the alloy at all but things like traceability, continuous monitoring and testing of critical material properties, and supply chain.
They announced that it is reaching „the latter stage“ of its life. Not that it has reached EOL.
in 10 years RUD will mean exploded, that's how language works.

retarded used to be a medical term to replace loaded terms such as imbecile. You can see how successful that was.

It turns out, dressing up an idea does absolutely nothing since it's the idea that has the negative connotation. And why shouldn't "exploded" be viewed in a negative light?
I thought this was going to be about pipeline workflows... but then I saw it was Bartosz!

I know what I'll be spending a stupid amount of time reading today :)
I don’t see how the (to me) obvious fix would make IAM any harder. The bug is that they are treating account owner id as a string, allowing matching against it with prefix operations. It is a guid and should only have equal/not-equal tests.

As there are no “valid” IAM use cases for prefix matching on a resource id (you don’t control the resource id so you can never group resources by using a common prefix, etc) then there is no difficulty imposed by patching this.

The only question is backwards compatibility. If some idiot somewhere actually used a prefix match against a substring in production to match part of their actual resource id, this would presumably break it.

As for potential for harm, I don’t think it’s as low as you make it out to be. It’s hard to be anonymous online. This is another example of that. Forget common crawl or Carvana, and think dissident or whistleblower.
There's a section of the page that says:

>Get notified on future versions(including Linux) and clinical studies!
Why Do These Words Get Mispronounced So Much? [video]
Wouldn't that imply that a person whose site legitimately went viral would be stuck with the $100k bill?
Great idea. Leaf-cutter ants have something like five worker castes (soldier, excavator, forager, garbage collector, gardener) so managing that distribution might be a fun part of a game (tending towards Ant Factorio). e.g.

https://youtu.be/VLBDVXLiWxQ?t=301
> Really? You don't think it's a matter of updating the prompt and expanding the context to include more of the code?

AI isn't magic. If the "why" isn't in the code, there's no way for it to magically synthesize it.

Comments explaining "there's a check for this edge case because we saw a problem in production when client X did something, see JIRA-1234 for more details" are what you should be aspiring to. If a human doesn't write that down, the AI can't invent it.
Ars tried and failed to reproduce the text, and then assumed that OpenAI closed a loophole when in fact they may have changed nothing - it’s just that NYT hired a team of experts to make tens of thousands of attempts to break the normal behavior of the model, while Ars didn’t:

“ ChatGPT has apparently closed that loophole in between the preparation of that suit and the present. We entered some of the prompts shown in the suit, and were advised "I recommend checking The New York Times website or other reputable sources," although we can't rule out that context provided prior to that prompt could produce copyrighted material.”

If I tried to do what NYT did, I would:

- give up after a few attempts

- get worried that I’m going to be banned from using OpenAI (a rational concern, because it doesn’t take a lot to get banned)

- doubt the veracity of any “reproduced” text that I may receive

The equilibrium here is for OpenAI to suggest signing up for NYT and providing a signup link if it detects interest in doing so.
You should probably put this in quotes as OOP is disseminating russian propaganda.
Because the information leading to the comment is not necessarily in the code itself? E.g ‘we did this because of business constraint xyz’
Can you point to where a union employee was a root cause of the Max debacle? Because as I read it, most of the mistakes were of a design nature (i.e., mistakes of white-collar employees). Your comment reads like you started with a conclusion and worked backwards.
Same energy as sqlite using etilqs as their file extension for no reason other than to mildly amuse onlookers who "know" and to deter the uninitiated from sending them unearned complaints.
Language Tool
It’s not clear which part of the comment you meant when you said it’s not true, but PTFE is a PFAS, exactly how toxic it is or isn’t I don’t think is well known yet but people have been living with PTFE implants.
Really appreciate you sharing this. I definitely value tests and feels great when I write a piece of test that I see value in and didn't invest more into the test then the function.

I will give the website a shot and report back.
Language Tool?
Malicious Compliance is the term
I'm not deciding what the company can spend on, that's the point. That person isn't doing me a favour, they are doing a favour to a company.
Do you have an example of those comments you think would be helpful for beginners?

The second point doesn't seem like a positive on the whole, except maybe for the company selling it, in the "there's good money to be made in being part of the problem" sense.

Edit: I noticed one comment that seemed like it added some useful context: For CheckAdditionalSpringConfigurationMetadata.Report::iterator it says "Each line represents a source code file and its associated problems." However, this turns out to be completely wrong, if I'm reading the code right, because a line could represent a filename, or a problem, or just be a blank line. The comment gives the appearance of being helpful while actually just adding confusion and wasting everyone's time.
Who do you think came up with this rule, bleeding heart liberals’? Stop and think for a second, why does that rule exist?

You described a fantasy world, in the real world everyone makes mistakes, and if the mistakes are punished, then there are no mistakes because no one reports them. That is until the mistake is so catastrophic, it cannot be covered up- that’s how you get Chernobyl or Boeing max
Oh what a shame that the sub-minimum wage gig economy hadn't been worked out yet, what an absolute tragedy for WebVan.
"...due to the climaxing rampant corruption in the US..." What?

"...constraints of corrupt capitalism" caused websites to be boated?
Wake up babe, new Bartosz Ciechanowski just dropped
"Why" comments typically refer to things outside of the actual code, such as:

* Past incidents

* Regulations

* What the code used to do, and why that was bad

The whole point of a really good comment is that you can't infer it just by looking at the code. That's why it's there at all!
Doing something in an unskillful way, but by accident as well as purposefully (so - messing around). In this case I was hinting towards the latter meaning.
The answer to these types of questions is, depends upon who gets the case. Generally, the further along you've gotten within legal limits, the better the chance that the case will be given serious consideration and time.
If you like his work, here's his patreon: https://www.patreon.com/ciechanowski/
https://eta.lbl.gov/publications/united-states-data-center-e... ( 3.5 MB pdf for the full report https://eta-publications.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/lbnl-10... )

https://www.energy.gov/eere/buildings/data-centers-and-serve...

https://www.wired.com/story/amazon-google-microsoft-green-cl...

They do / have.
it not about avoiding paying them (you will anyway unless you're in very narrow class of orgs) its about being in the wrong legal structure and getting stuck in administrative hell because you don't fit in their tidy little classification boxes.
Nothing illogical, Russia had been limiting supply due to supposed technical reasons for months before, with a clear intention to empty European/German reserves. Look at the charts of gas flows and storage prior to the war and the literally hindreds or news articles on this.
Yup, I think (ahem) the term for that is "analysis paralysis"