skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This actually sounds like an interesting case to me because the details make a huge legal difference in my mind. (But IANAL, maybe I'm entirely off base here.)

E.g., did they tell you the shipping date after you placed the order, or before? If it was afterward, then it can't have invalidated the contract... you agreed to it without knowing when it would ship. If they told you before, then was it before they knew your shipping address, or after? If it was beforehand, then again, it should've been clear that they wouldn't be able to guarantee it without knowing the address. If it was after they got the address but before you placed the order, then that makes for a strong case, since it was specific to your order and what you agreed to before placing it.
I agree that there probably will be “uncensored” fine tuned models that become available, my point was just that it’s not accurate to call Gemma “the opposite of censored” because there is a somewhat involved step that needs to be taken before it even appears uncensored.
It’s also likely missing a lot of useful context that was removed from the training set and not meaningfully replaced during fine-tuning, and besides that any fine tuned “uncensored” model will be based on Gemma, not Google’s Gemma itself.

IMO “Opposite of uncensored” suggests a model whose original form eagerly gives out controversial / typically censored information, not a model that is censored but able to be fine tuned away from censorship.
I'd say OP actually talked about two different things. The abstract description in the first paragraph is the rule of law (which I agree happened a long time ago, and is a good thing for a democratic society), but the concrete gripe in the later paragraphs is a different thing.

Rather, it's something like the difference between laws applying to individuals who may violate normative behavior ("it's illegal to steal"), or whether laws (in this context aka "regulations") apply continuously to above board businesses, with the goal of a priori preventing individual violations of normative behavior ("it's illegal to make a car that can be easily stolen").
I think it would be fun to explore the 10 bit idea a bit more. Yes, you would have to have more code to work with it; but that is exactly what would be fun to explore.

That is, I'd love to see an exploration of how big both the encoding and the executing program are and how they play against each other. As others have already noted, you could skip the encoding of the board as a "first class" piece of data and instead have a large program where the state of the board is implied by where in the code you are. In a sense, this is a complete minimization of the board's encoding and should result in a maximal sized code.

It would be fun to plot how these two values interact with each other.
Completely unrelated but I saw an interesting analogy recently: forks make it a lot easier to gain weight.
Lock it in your garage and now they break into your house and hold a gun to your head….ya maybe they tow it but not likely as they want to do this discreetly but at the end of the day of course if they were determined they could take anything. My point is a kill switch would stop 99% of theft.
Which part is offensive to you?
Propably a remnant of the birthplace of our sun? Basically a slice of the nebula that spawned the system dragged along for the longest ride ever?
>This article is about Canada

but really it applies to the US as well, since the US has a similar rate of car theft (~280 thefts per 100k people, vs ~220 in canada, if you trust statista) and is also working to ban the flipper zero.
77% of the cost of a kWh in California are fixed costs. So if production cost 19 cents, then your cost would be 19 cents + 77% of your current price + a few more cents for the profit on the production costs. IOW, it would increase your electricity bills.
> “There’s a tradition of scientists approaching senility to come up with grand, improbable theories,” the late physicist Freeman Dyson told Newsweek back in 2002. “Wolfram is unusual in that he’s doing this in his 40s.”

That is a brutal take down. Did Dyson and Wolfram have a math-beef going or something?
Yes. I maintain some open source Mac apps in my spare time (and even develop new ones from time to time) using Objective-C. I've known and used this programming language for 20 years, and don't really see the point of investing in Swift given the way the Apple ecosystem has developed.
English common law is largely not codified but the result of practices and precedent, and is still part of the legal system in most English-speaking countries, as opposed to continental-style civil codes that you mention which are more explicit. I do think that distinction exists in the English-speaking world.
> Linux maintainers have little idea of how different libc implementers expose the interface they provide

This is literally false. A huge chunk of discussion on kernel mailing lists is exactly about this subject.

And, again. When OP used the word "Linux" they meant the entire operating system. The fact that this is also the name of the kernel project is irrelevant. Perhaps OP should've written "GNU/Linux" to satisfy mindless bureaucrats, but, I guess, OP hoped that this wouldn't be necessary.
much like Tesla's Autopilot which cannot be responsible for an accident because you're supposed to be hands-on-wheel and alert at all times while using it.
Chat with open source models in your area!
Too busy jailing and freezing the bank accounts of political enemies.
Imagine a human brain that has only read all what ANN has without any connection to the real world (no senses, mind you!). Would the output of this human being differ from "human blabbing"?
You can always smash the window, but that can draw negative attention.
In this example, I could see a library parsing xml spin off a process so it can track state. I could also see a performance argument for not wanting to do potentially computationally expensives (or even I/O expensive) work on the main process blocking other things.

I'm not enough of a parser expert to know whether stateless processing is possible, but that's how I can see a simple xml parser ending up in a separate process.
> The ~$10B OpenAI investment by Microsoft is roughly 6 weeks of Azure revenue.

Revenue isn't what is important. Profit is since profit is the money you have after costs to invest. But since cloud is highly profitable as it is, the point still stands I suppose.

> It would be a fascinating outcome if the predicted oligopoly in fact ends up as several exclusive partnerships.

I thought people were predicting independent silos? Where highly profitable and cash rich companies like apple, microsoft, google, facebook, etc own their entire stack or exist as their own ecosystem. Where the likes of apple does everything in-house - AI, cloud, OS, chips, etc. The whole she-bang.
That's what I don't understand.

I asked it why it assumed Native Americans were in Japan and it said:

> I assumed [...] various ethnicities, including Indigenous American, due to the diversity present in Japan throughout history. However, this overlooked [...] I focused on providing diverse representations without adequately considering the specific historical context.

I see no reason why this sort of thing won't extend to _all_ questions/prompts, so right now I have 0 reason to use Gemini over current models. From my testing and use, it isn't even better at anything to make fighting with it worth it.
Handling nuclear material straight out of the reactor is a good way to kill yourself very painfully.
There's a lot of ATMs in Targets. If they have that much watching, I think I want to stand with my hand over the buttons now.

Although someone could probably watch your fingers at the checkout lane put in your pin. Camera script to correlate fingers to access pins automatedly. Machine vision is so much more advanced. Four finger movements, four numbers, tada, debit card access. I could probably write that with ML Kit.

Correlated to your exact receipt, purchases, and time of purchase (with enough fidelity to say "you put your card in your pocket at ##:##"). Track your card through the system, and what bank/clearing house is passing the transaction. When did this exact number amount of money go through and where did the lines send the data? What account was the final transaction processed through?
I placed their Link component within a polymorphic wrapper which could switch between Link and plain anchor elements depending on the props given. The typing was gnarly, but it worked well. By default it would be a Link as I recall, but things like a non-relative href or use=“a” props would swap it for an anchor. And maybe other things, I’m not sure. It would reject Link props if it knew it was using an anchor element, though.

I’m ashamed to say this took way too long to get working nicely. It was worth it because our linting otherwise went crazy over misuse of Link and anchor, and people on the team weren’t respecting it. This made it so we could say “only use Link” and make it easy for that to be accomplished.

Trust me, it’s way easier to get stuff done with Next :)

Once you get past the day or three spent making it so links do what you wish they did… And you discover it handles cache headers differently than it’s supposed to… And middleware doesn’t work in several contexts with no explanation… And on and on.
Wouldn't the analog of .htm be .yam?
I find myself shocked that people ask questions of the world from these models, as though pulping every text and its component words relationships and deriving statistical relationships between them should reliably deliver useful information.

Don’t get me wrong, I’ve used LLMs and been amazed by their output, but the p-zombie statistical model has no idea what it is saying back to you and the idea that we should trust these things at all just seems way premature
IM-1 Mission Completes Lunar Orbit Insertion and Enters Lunar Orbit
Why do you find communism and comolete loss of autonomy preferable to our current system?
For those who haven't heard of it before, a sentence from the article explaining what it is

> With Code Verify, you can confirm that your Instagram Web code hasn’t been tampered with or altered, and that your Instagram Web experience is the same as everyone else’s.
I think you are being biased and closed minded and overly critical. Here are some wonderful examples of it generating images of historical figures:

https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1760187341468270686

This will lead to a better educated more fair populace and better future for all.
Nothing like that on the Samsungs I've owned. Next phone will be a Pixel, so we'll see.
Wow, this is a third commenter who didn't bother to read what OP wrote.

Come on! OP meant the whole OS, not the kernel project. How is this not obvious?
Yup! We have looked into runtime checks to supplement the static analysis. From talking to other users, they've used similar runtime checks in CI and staging environments to catch dynamic imports and even check specific method usages.
That was FaceTime, and it was because it was a peer-to-peer protocol. Then Apple was sued over a patent and had to implement a more normal design, where it pays for and runs the servers. Apple didn't want to run the servers for Android people to talk to each other.
In case it wasn't clear, I'm talking about taking basic video/still security footage while paying for something. There's no such thing as two-party consent for that.

That has nothing to do with audio recording, which seems to be what you're talking about. I'm not talking about audio, nor is the original article in question, nor the coffee machine in question.
Agree with most everything, your description resonates (also a since 1988 mathematica person).

Theo Gray is who came up with the notebook, that iPython -> Jupyter were a multilanguage shout-out to, and they cite such. Other UIUC professors wrote significant parts of Mathematica originally, were paid for such.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_Gray
I'm not sure why people keep responding with this. Signal doesn't want to work on the federated problem, sure, I'm well aware. But everything is open source. We're on a forum of hackers, makers, and programmers. So what is in the way? People keep saying "Signal this" "Signal that", what are they gonna do, stop sourcing the code? Ruin their entire business model? I doubt it. The code is open, so seriously, someone tell me what's stopping you all from creating a federated version?
Ah yes it's limited to single documents.

Using AppleScript/JavaScript to pull multiple notes is a good idea!
It's contradictory feeling but it's often easier to know more about small things far away than small things nearby.

The reason? Light.

Webb was able to detect the absorption characteristics of PAH (the organic molecules in question) from a distance because there was light from behind illuminating it (and it was absorbing only parts of that light). We know roughly what the light being emitted "looks like" so we are able to extrapolate based on what light isn't present what is in that region. And it wasn't as if individual particles were being seen but rather there is a sufficient density of these molecules spread out in the regions where they were detected that when the light passed through them, it was noticeable from a distance. Kinda like how you can't see the air but you can see the sky.

I'm probably not explaining it super well but it's the phenomenon where you can see the gaps in between up close but from far away it looks like one big blob.

But point being Webb was able to make that discovery because those molecules basically had a giant lamp shining on them from behind and we the observer are at such a distance that we can see all the little bits of information that would otherwise be indistinguishable from noise all together at once.

Now comparatively, the stuff out in the far reaches of our solar system have a lamp shining on them (our sun) but we are on the wrong side to be able to see the shadows that are cast. So unfortunately that means if we want to learn about this blindspot of ours we have to physically go out there to see it.
The Singleton case is NP-complete

If you consider NP second-order existential logic, meaning that given x, you will get a y, While there may be many true values that aren't y, it will help

Attention, which requires feed forward networks, which approximate a DAG, you can think of attention as run time reweighing to change what y value is returned.

PH is a query expressible in second-order logic, which would allow for 'for any' at the second level.

The reduction in the general case to just logarithmic time: O(n log n), would cause issue, there will not be any movement from quadratic time to linear time without massive new discoveries.

It is inherent from the restrictions of ANNs having binary output.

Considering FP and FNP vs P and NP may help as they make that property clearer than the concept of second-order existential logic does in some contexts.
I wonder if you gave it a fictional unit of distance and told it so, if it would get it right?

Given that a gnorflork is a unit of distance...
I don't have this problem with any other model. I've had really long conversations with ChatGPT on road trips and it has never gone off the rails like Gemini seems to do.
Maybe so, although there's usually at least some justification for it, whether it's performance related or just as simple as "the API can get a lot better when it can track some state so you don't have to pass every initialization value in every time." I particularly don't agree with the latter most of the time, but I can see how they arrive at the gen server conclusion.
Yeah, it happens on two of the 970 EVO Plus models. One on the older revision, and one on the newer. (I think there are only two?) It happens on both Linux and Windows. Uhh, I'm not sure about the kernel versions. I don't remember what I had booted at the time. On Windows I've seen it happen as far back as 1607 and as recently as 21H2. I've also seen it happen on someone else's computer (laptop.)

It's really easy to reproduce (at least for me?) and I'm pretty sure anyone can do it if they try to on purpose.
> The cameras cannot capture audio, she added.

This is a classic political statement. Perhaps 100% correct.

But notice how they didn't say "no audio is recorded in the room".
yet another bullshit generator :p
if you own a vizio and its connected to the internet, disconnect it. mine made my pihole work overtime redirecting all its phone home requests. hate to think why it wants to call home all the time
Well, they want 7 years of logs. 110 * 365.25 * 7 * users = quite a bit
You need both. You need the majority of people to do the right thing, and the law to deal with the minority.

The problem is that you do need to take precautions against the minority for some things - especially high reward (e.g. car theft) or high harm (assaults) in public spaces.

I think there is a another problem here. How can car companies sell insecure vehicles? Why do people buy cars from companies with a track record or bad security, why do they buy cars with high risk systems (e.g. keyless entry), and why are those selling insecure cars not being made to compensate their customers? The problem should be fixed by the markets or the normal operation of the courts.
Awesome! Huge problem in a lot of Python codebases, and hard to get around this problem without trying to go all in on type-safety. Even so, you don't get granular control like this.
i think western society is just currently in its "massive overcorrection from decades of ignorance/stigma about mental health issues" phase, it'll probably balance itself out over time, or at least i hope it will.

at the moment it's just impossible to even have the conversation, the concept that people aren't just forever victims of their own feelings and that some or even most people need to do real hard work on themselves is straight up offensive to a lot of people.
Sure, there is "speculation" about pretty much anything and everything. There's speculation that quantum flux based life could exist on the surface of the sun.

The speculation that is based on things we already know to be possible, speculates that life could be possible in the subsurface ocean.
> So did they held any humans accountable then?

Not yet. The Inquiry is still taking evidence. They haven't taken evidence from the big-hitters yet, that begins in April.

In fact the Inquiry doesn't "hold humans accountable"; but they can compel witnesses, who testify under oath.

Gerald Barnes is the Fujitsu engineer who stated in the prosecution cases that Horizon was reliable ("robust"). His testimony to the Inquiry has been delayed, because on the morning he was supposed to testify, the Post Office "discovered" a million or so emails that they'd failed to disclose. So he'll be on the stand in April, along with the senior execs.

The Inquiry videos make quite pleasant watching; the lawyers and the judge are immaculately polite, there are no trick questions, and it's all about finding out what happened. I'm looking forward to seeing the senior execs on the stand.

The police are following the Inquiry; nobody's been charged, and my guess is they'll hold off on charging people until the Inquiry is over (that's part of the purpose of statutory inquiries). So the succession of Post Office Ministers that have overseen this disgrace will all be out of office by then.
The Roots Investment Community Fund Review
You say that, but this applies to all cherry picking you can do between branches as well. As long as they don't conflict you're golden, and if there's a conflict you can commit a resolution that'll commute with your branch until you merge back into main.

It would enable so many nice and less strict workflows to actually work if it ever got momentum, I've still got hope.
I imagine in modern devices adding a "fully fledged video camera" is a lot simpler than adding a laser that has moving parts and regulatory baggage.
Yieldstreet Review
> Notebooks, like Jupter, clearly came from his work

While I often hear this claim from Wolfram and his supporters, I have never seen any evidence that it was his innovation. MathCAD was the first software released with a notebook interface, and there was research using those ideas prior to the release of the first Mathematica notebook. Maybe his particular take was an improvement on the others, but the claim that it was entirely his idea seems to me to be 100% incorrect.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notebook_interface#History
Yea, it seems to be the same ridiculous nonsense in the image generation.
Google Brings Gemini to Gmail, Docs, Slides, and More
To be honest, there's also entire fields of study of how God makes everything in the world happen, so I doubt I'm much convinced by how many fields of studies there are. People have been able to bullshit each other over obvious things for eons. The existence of such fields means nothing.
NPR's Tiny Desk Concerts became a pop culture phenomenon
when we consider wage theft as a significant driver of poverty, punishment for the 13 year old is more useless than anything.
They’re confusing it with FaceTime: https://youtu.be/JOxf9tEXEKQ
No single journey to New England cost a trillion dollars but neither does a single manned trip to Mars. Over time hundreds of ships brought thousands of people to dozens of colonies. Ships kept bringing people even after the colonies were self-sustaining. How much did european colonization of the east coast cost?

History is full of people selling everything and taking a one way trip into a new frontier.
Laravel Administration Panel
Google, at the moment, is a tech company whose products are actively engaged in the falsification of history for political purposes.

I honestly have no idea where they are going with this but I don't want to be part of it.
It sounds like your therapist is in the wrong profession.

I've interacted with four different ones so far, and while the value I got out of them varied greatly I think none of them would ever say BS like that.

> I sure do hope I actually have ADHD

I hope whoever tests you is not like the ADHD "specialist" I had to deal with. Knowingly swapped symptoms and cause in the final report for whatever reason, and made terrible jokes that indicated he either doesn't know the basics I could read on Wikipedia or just already made up his mind beforehand.
Absolutely fantastic when it comes to disorders subtle enough that you even question yourself sometimes.
While also getting you more reliable and consistent power generation than anything you'd get from Solar or Wind.
I think giving a patch its own identity is a pretty neat concept and clearly different than the git approach, so thanks for this example!
>because they feel bad about it.

You do realize that some portion of the population can't feel bad about it right?

Needless to say, I pray to whatever deities that you do not work in computer security. You would be laughed out of existence by saying "Just tell the world to be nice" rather than say, not write SQL injections.

How about "Tell all the viruses to be nice and not infect cells".
React Router is still great, and in fact has gotten dramatically better as a result of its place at the core of Remix. Data router eliminates loading spinners and makes your SPA feel like a real application.
>> I understand that for many use-cases caching at the response level may be preferable

Yes after all the data + work/compute

>> there are also many use-cases that are read-heavy but also involve a lot of computed values that are updated and have to be recomputed regularly, where this dataflow-based approach has been shown to be one of the least compute intensive and efficient solutions.

From a comp sci, from a programing, from an engineering perspective I get this. But at the end of the day those are just the hammers and nails of the business. I am wondering where the actual, in production use case, with business need requires this. I can think of a dozen technical fuck ups where this solution is appealing but that's just stacking irresponsibly...