skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
True. Although an ISP can say they do source filtering and then fail to implement it properly. For example my ISP at home implements source filtering on IPv4, but not on IPv6.
This is a legit issue, although they claimed to have mostly fixed it:
https://twitter.com/sama/status/1754172149378810118 (by Sam Altman)

> gpt-4 had a slow start on its new year's resolutions but should now be much less lazy now!

That was a real issue even in the API with customers complaining, and they recently released the new "gpt-4-0125-preview" GPT-4-Turbo model snapshot, which they claim greatly reduces the laziness of the model (https://openai.com/blog/new-embedding-models-and-api-updates):

> Today, we are releasing an updated GPT-4 Turbo preview model, gpt-4-0125-preview. This model completes tasks like code generation more thoroughly than the previous preview model and is intended to reduce cases of “laziness” where the model doesn’t complete a task. The new model also includes the fix for the bug impacting non-English UTF-8 generations.
Don't forget that after WW2 the US still had racial segregation laws, so thinking of ethnic groups as inferior wasn't unknown to the US
I see wiggle room in the statement you posted in that the SSD storage that is physically inside the machine hosting the instance might be mounted into the hypervised instance itself via some kind of network protocol still, adding overhead.
Wow I didn't know that. Thanks for pointing it out.

That's brutal.
Ozempic has entered the chat...
You are a bit naive here. Those type customers are extremely common, and there are specialized jobs to deal with such customers.

In SW they are the PM's. Without a good PM to shield you from the customers insanities you are lost. In architecture or other engineering professions it's the same. As architect you have a special man to deal with politicians and special clients, and in many other professions even with the press, who has no idea either.

Never talk directly to the customer. Or if so, you are not allowed to make promises.
This is really interesting, thanks for sharing! I'd imagine the three-character trick would have failed on programming-based ebooks, right? With all those underscores and stuff. Do you remember the preprocessing steps you took for this?

On a side note, I just spent like an hour on your blog. Fascinating stuff!
it's not clear to me what you want to happen. It sounds like you have a command line tool that takes no arguments. you want a Mac user to be able to download a file, click that file, have it run once? and then delete itself? Not sure about this last part

in any case I think there are plenty of apps that do this. Some are distributed as packages instead of apps.

I'm not a Mac dev expert at all but I have used enough apps to know it's possible. Many of those apps are open source maybe look into them if you want to solve this issue.

Electron apps have tools for automatically signing on GitHub actions so looking though what they do might help?

sorry I don't have concrete suggestions. I'm just confident there are solutions.

I'm totally sympathetic to the fact they it's a pain in the ass and Apple, probably intentionally, doesn't document the process well or at all
Sort of the point, innit?
Basically all feedback is at runtime.
Darwin Online
*2021 depending on who you ask
I see, thanks for your explanation!
Ask HN: Best Time to Post on HN?
I wonder when would be the best time to post (e.g. Show HN) to HN if you are out for exposure. My guess would be when most people get back from work (ET timezone)? Or during commuting?
It's open-source and you must either self host it, install it as a program on your desktop or install it as an application on your phone or tablet. See the Downloads page.
(Thanks for the compliment!)

I should be able to try this the next few weeks (new gig). But again, I'll be working on a prototype where such projections have already been made, the plan have already been laid out, and I'll mostly have to follow orders with relatively little wiggle room (they also expect me to hit the ground running). My only expected impact there is whether the stuff gets done on time or not. And assuming it is, the main company will throw the prototype away and rewrite everything anyway (at least they're supposed to).
Apple’s tools really could emit better messages when things go wrong. It’s sad that they hit a dead-end with this after everything they went through.

Windows isn’t a cakewalk either (you now have to use a hardware security module to store your certs, which means USB stick based signing or using a cloud service that supports HSMs, plus certs themselves are a racket in terms of pricing).
ei ai went crazo
Another idea in addition to these ideas is charge based on number of licenses (e.g. linked to usage, number of users, or so on). This is easier to track and you can track it on your end.
Rapidus buys ASML machines, because it's the only available option and developing national machine isn't their focus
Why not just ship it as a Homebrew package instead? It's jankier than any of the usual Linux packaging systems, but should get the work done. (Of course, it doesn't solve the “running from Finder” problem, but then again you don't usually run your command line tools by double clicking them in file manager, do you?)
I think the point is pretty clearly “Apple should do better and provide better tools”
> I think the remark is more about these sort of rhetorical tactics which permeate every topic. It is a fair remark.

It's not a fair remark though, all it did was twist what I said into a inflammatory derailment.

The point is there are a lot of (usually technical) people who are too focused one aspect, but are missing the bigger picture. If you follow them, you'll probably get a communication app that only those people can/will use, which has deal breakers for mass-market adoption. And once that happens, those people probably won't use it either, since they want to communicate outside their group.
Ok, so I gotta ask - why package it at all? I'd never recommend it for a public tool, but in an internal, trusted environment, why not post a "curl ... | sh" command? Or point them at the master/main.zip of the repo where that script lives in gitlab/hub/something?

If this is aimed for developers, going through all of that to provide an installable and clickable thing feels a bit unnecessary...

Alternatively, since you're already using nixpkgs, that contains some wrappers and examples for signing Darwin binaries. May be easier than doing it from scratch.
My point was that the original comment is a low-level view with missing details that gives little insight on the complexity of the phenomenon, not a support for dualism. It's all brain tissues and the information they encode.

I think we agree and it was fun to write this out.
Linux runs mostly fine nowadays – I'd say the experience is smoother than with Windows, even. Have you tried it recently?
>The Martian government was directed by 10 men, the leader of whom was elected by universal suffrage for five years and entitled ‘Elon.’ Two houses of Parliament enacted the laws to be administered by the Elon and his cabinet.

That's not a Führer but more like a president.

Did you omit the election part on purpose or did you only find an incomplete quote?
Call me a cynic but I have zero trust for a man who becomes the wealthiest on the planet and, rather than have a little gratitude and actual try to give back, is then consumed by getting the f out of here before the crowd with pitchforks arrive.

And, no, personally I don’t think Tesla or SpaceX count as giving back.

Why can’t our billionaires at least just slink off to the lovely beaches of some island somewhere. Oh wait, egos…

But Mars? Mars? How does that sound enjoyable? I actually hope he makes it there.

And millions of people? I’m no expert but are there even anywhere near enough launch windows for that? And I’m guessing even just figuring out the cost of the fuel to reach escape velocity would show how this a non-starter for more than Musk himself and a few companions.
We can definitely ask for clarification. But fighting back is a grounds for being moved up the ax list. One workaround is trying stuff for free and present the results. Free labour for the employer, yay!
If you read the article, you’d know.
I think that you've misunderstood what I said. For large instances of this specific problem (and when the time limit is too short to allow either CP-SAT or CPLEX to prove optimality) the best integer feasible solution found by CP-SAT is generally of better quality (w.r.t. the objective value) than the best integer feasible solution found by CPLEX. Furthermore, in some cases, CP-SAT can offer a certificate of optimality faster than CPLEX.
> Electron apps have tools for automatically signing on GitHub actions so looking though what they do might help?

These only sign/notarise the dmg or app bundles (or the binaries inside them), so I don’t think that will help the OP unless they’re willing to wrap their CLI app in an Electron app, unfortunately.
Lil kidney pains if you go to the library when you were supposed to go elsewhere :(
The text on archive.org has both Elan and Elon ... there may be an OCR issue here:

The Martian government was directed by ten men, the leader of whom was elected by universal suffrage for five years and entitled “Elan.”

Two houses of Parliament enacted the laws to be administered by the Elon and his cabinet.

The Upper House was called the Council of the Elders and was limited to a membership of 60 persons, each being appointed for life by the Elon as vacancies occurred by death.

In principle, the method was not unlike that by which the College of Cardinals of the Roman Catholic Church is appointed.

Usually the Elon chose historians, churchmen, former cabinet members or successful economic leaders who could offer lifetimes of valuable experience.

https://archive.org/stream/ProjectMars/MarsProject_djvu.txt

ADDENDUM:

It's Elon !! The first appearance as "Elan" was an OCR glitch:-

https://archive.org/details/ProjectMars/page/n179/mode/2up
ADHD may have been an evolutionary advantage, research suggests
As opposed to all the other red-blooded purebred American murderers.
I think the real problem is we don't know what these LLMs SHOULD do. We've managed to emulate humans producing text using statistical methods, by training a huge corpus of data. But we have no way to tell if the output actually makes any sense.

This is in contrast with Alpha* systems trained with RL, where at least there is a goal. All these systems are essentially doing is finding an approximation of an inverse function (model parameters) to a function that is given by the state transition function.

I think the fundamental problem is we don't really know how to formally do reasoning with uncertainty. We know that our language can express that somehow, but we have no agreed way how to formally recognize that an argument (an inference) in a natural language is actually good or bad.

If we knew how to formally define whether an informal argument is good or bad (so that we could compare them), that is, if we knew a function which would tell if the argument is good or bad, then we could build an AI that would search for its inverse, i.e. provide good arguments and draw correct conclusions. Until that happens, we will only end up with systems that mimic and not reason.
I think they were making a jab at Apple. Not saying they can’t run Unix.
I have also seen ChatGPT going berserk yesterday, but in a different way. I have successfully used ChatGPT to convert an ORM query into an actual SQL query for performance trouble shooting. It mostly worked until yesterday when it start outputting garbage table names that weren't even present in the code.

ChatGPT seemed to think the code is literature and was trying to write the sequel to it. The code style matches the original one so it took some head scratching to find out why those tables didn't exist.
>Sanctions were not self-defeating, if anything, they were effective in their goals and slowed China down.

What goal is that again? China is down to 5-7nm chips in practically no time which is more than enough for virtually every industrial and military application (the latter being the ostensible target of sanctions).

Huawei is even shipping phones now again on domestic supply chains. Pretty much the only thing the sanction have achieved is what, that Chinese gamers can't play Cyberpunk 2077 at max graphic settings? The irony is that cutting edge chips are predominantly used in sectors that China itself regulates to hell already. If you're concerned with China's generative AI advances you could have spared yourself the sanctions because so is the Chinese government
I'd say the fact that you can not enter a seed phrase into an app on computer or website should be like "level 1" required crypto knowledge. I understand that many are still failing at this daily.
Well, knowing an architect quite well they have exactly the same issues as we do of poor specifications that change, quite often due to unforeseen things on site. While a single person might be smart, people in general are idiots.
This sounds a lot like normal software architect work at big corp. You write the spec, it gets sent off somewhere cheap, the people there lied on their CV or got their degree from a diploma mill, they will ignore your spec and make all the tests green instead of checking if they do something, and then you need to take responsibility.
> …always orbiting meaning, but never touching down.

This is a nice turn of phrase :) .
$765.00 USD is a reasonable price, even if it's only 8GB max
memory. Would really like to know how hot it runs though, I've
been searching for a laptop that stays cool, even when pushed

Their marketing page (with a little more detail) for the same
laptop is:

https://deepcomputing.io/product/dc-roma-risc-v-laptop/
There is also a non-russian alternative called M1 that's being kickstarted https://www.cnx-software.com/2024/02/16/m1-flipper-zero-alte...
People(old and young) give away their entire life savings to scammers every day, everywhere in the world. You don't hear about it on the internet all the time because we either got used to it or they don't want the publicity. You hear about big cryptocurrency scams more often because people invested are more into tech and spend time on the internet. Do you say that cash is not ready or appropriate for mainstream use? What about that cashier that never has that 1c of change back? Clearly a sign of not being appropriate for mainstream.

Those generic arguments can be applied to literally everything we already have. People get scammed via their bank accounts every day too, people literally get scammed by the phone. You have to use your brain when it comes to _anything_ that involves a real world value these days, saying 'crypto bad cause scams' is pointless as there are way more scams involving real world money everywhere.
For fucks sake! Here is what that book actually says;

> The Martian government was directed by ten men, the leader of whom was ELECTED BY UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE FOR FIVE YEARS and entitled "Elon". Two houses of Parliament enacted the laws to be administered by the Elon and his cabinet.

Where did you get this Fuhrer crap? The book doesn't say it, nor does Wikipedia. Did you cynically make it up and think nobody would notice, or did you accidentally imagine it because you perceive what you expect or want to see?
> If your interface gets in the way of things being done, then the interface is the wrong tool for the job.

Tell that to Microsoft, Google, Mozilla, Apple.
They either never heard of it or they don't care.
Don't know VM has a shortcut helper, good to know.

Also I highly recommend VM as your main userscript runner.

It's fully open-source unlike TM, its development is rapid despite having basically only two developers (use the beta version, if needed), and in my very rudimentary tests it runs faster than other competitors (which only makes a difference when you have 100+ scripts or very heavy ones, of course.)
This can all be achieved with a simple shell script to compile the binary on the devs machine.

Xcode-select —install

git clone…

make
I was not really interested in LLMs till a month back. I had an earlier product where I wanted a no-code app for business insights on any data source. Plug in MySQL, PostgreSQL, APIs like Stripe, Salesforce, Shopify, even CSV files and it would be able to generate queries from user's GUI interactions. Like Airtable but for own data sources. I was generating SQLs including JOINs, or HTTPS API calls.

Then I abandoned it in 2021. This year, it struck me that LLMs would be great to infer business insights from the schema. I could create reports and dashboards automatically, surface critical action points straight from the schema/data and users chatting with the app.

So for the last couple weeks, I have been building it, running test on LLMs (CodeLlama, Zephyr, Mistral, Llama 2, Claude and ChatGPT). The results are quite good. There is a lot of tech that I need to handle: schema analysis, SQL or API calls, and the whole UI. But without LLMs, there was no clear way for me to infer business insights from schema + user chats.

To me, this is not a niche anymore now that I have found a problem I wanted to tackle already.
0.1% improvement doesn't even gets noticed by Google (it's noise) so this doesn't really make sense.
Fun fact: the favicon of that particular website hasn't been updated with the new crown logo, which I find ironic.
I've been through the same hell and there's basically just one way to publish software for macOS with no hassle for the user: Completely lock yourself in their ecosystem. That means working on a Mac, building in Xcode using Swift and publishing in the official app store. If you want to do anything that resembles the free software approaches of Linux, stay far away from Apple. If you really need to publish on Mac for whatever reason, it is so much better to dump the hassle on the user. Even if the core targets are not developers. And who knows, if you ruin the experience for enough users, Apple might actually bother to fix their system.
Speaking of odd monarchies:

Andorra is a "Unitary parliamentary diarchic constitutional co principality"

The two co-princes are:

1. Bishop of Urgell
2. King of France

Since there is no longer a king in France, the role of the second co-prince is taken by whoever is the president of France.

In other words the president of France becomes a prince of another state upon election in France.

It is an elected monarch but since people in Andorra don't get to vote in France, it's not an elected monarch elected in Andorra.

That's quite weird.
At a past job the team had a custom CLI tool to manage all sorts of dev tooling. Worked great, highly recommended.

The distribution mechanism was to build from source[]. Once compiled, all other dev tasks were handled by the tool.

If you compile it yourself you don't run into any of these issues. This approach is only viable for developer tools of course, but that's what the post is about.

[]: This was a Go project, so building from source was relatively straight forward.
Wait, is that the Al Zimmermann, who runs the massive recreational math programming contests http://azspcs.com/?

Without looking into what these images actually are and how they are generated, they remind me of mosaics I've made of hobby game contests https://williame.github.io/media/old/143376853353_1.jpg using https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungarian_algorithm, except _better_.
> I could imagine that in reality all of that isn't needed. Whether the algorithm really feels something or not - it doesn't matter as long as the expression is realistic enough for humans to believe that it feels something. Then you get the consciousness "injected" into your algorithm from the outside. Can you convince someone with a realistic sophisticated simulation that something is conscious even though it isn't? Probably. Still, it won't get you anywhere.

The thing is that I can't prove that you or anyone else is conscious either, including myself. With conscious acting AIs it will be the same, and these AIs will believe they are conscious in the same way as we do. So yes, we will have to treat them as if they are conscious.
good article actually. apple don't want you to do it :)
but why not use swift on xcode? i get that you don't want to but why is that?
> There's no way I'm getting my grandma on Matrix

Why ? Have you tried ?
An architect friend of mine had a special job for special clients, who turned out to be Saudi wives. They had good ideas, but their ideas changed every month with the newest update of their architectural magazine. So she went down to Riyadh or Mecca every other month to explain them the details of the design involved. The crazy thing is, that there were a couple of wives involved, not just one. And a couple of new high gloss architectural magazines.

A lot of models had to be built. But this is common. Hitler as another rich nightmare customer was famous for adoring Speer's models, and changing his mind constantly. He always knew better.
Wow same for me. Been using it for quite some time but just noticed the bug, what a coincidence to see it here.
Yeah I was curious and looked it up too. It's the Elon, but it seems like he's democratically elected?
What's the name of the function in ChiaLisp that returns true if this is an illegitimate transaction initiated by a hacker and false if it's being done by the real owner of the funds?
Both his and your comments come off as inflammatory derailment to me. That's how it reads, I'm not ascribing malintent. People didn't use to talk like this, I hope you reconsider.

"not just weird privacy geeks who never gave up on PGP." is simply not conducive towards making your point. You can make your (otherwise solid) point and even win the argument on merit without this sort of thing.
Thanks, good workaround :)
After 2 years? Not even European standard 2 year warranty applies anymore.
Perhaps it was written by an AI :)... One can never be certain these days.
You actually can pass certificates in files on disk to Apple's codesign utility, it just involves understanding .keychain files.

Also, while this only sometimes helps, it is worth looking for more error information in dmesg as that is where verification errors go.
I have a dedicated server that I got on their auction page for 30 euro per month. That gives me 64GB of ram, 8 cores and some disk space.

Sure, you can get a cheaper VPS, but given a VPS with the approx same perf it would cost much more.
Yes, I completely agree.
If your team doesn't have the skills to use a proper architecture within a monolith, letting them loose on a distributed system will make things a lot worse.
I've seen that happen multiple times.
I have not read a lot of Alan Moore, but reading this last bit

> The Moon and Serpent Bumper Book of Magic will transform your lives, your reality, and any spare lead that you happen to have lying around into the purest and most radiant gold.

I wonder how much he's actually attempting to change reality through literature (immanentize the eschaton!) and how much he's just playing with the idea.
Great pricing model when compared with Linear.app. If I have a budget of $8 I’d love to subscribe Dart rather than Linear.app
> While DALL·E 3 aims for accuracy and user customization, inherent challenges arise in achieving desirable default behavior, especially when faced with under-specified prompts. This choice may not precisely align with the demographic makeup of every, or even any, specific culture or geographic region. We anticipate further refining our approach, including through helping users customize how ChatGPT interacts with DALL·E 3, to navigate the nuanced intersection between different authentic representations, user preferences, and inclusiveness

This was explicitly called out in the DALLE system card [0] as a choice. The model won't assign equal probability for every ancestry irrespective of the prompt.

[0] https://cdn.openai.com/papers/DALL_E_3_System_Card.pdf
> That's not for you to decide.

Of course it is, my content my rules.