skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The real measure is the level of harm. That's it.

My ADHD meant I couldn't hold down a job or relationship. You lose your job enough times and the depression that follows is inevitable.

That said, I can imagine a Dustin where I had stumbled into a different career, a different family situation. Then my ADHD might not have caused enough problems to be a disorder.
Also the premise is BS. If everyone had ADHD then we might not use resources efficiently either. Considering that executive function is pretty uniquely human, the title may as will be “development of non-ADHD humans critical in evolutionary journey”
_If_ it's known to exist by the person suing
Partial State in Dataflow-Based Materialized Views [pdf]
> thus a rebase in git is not required.

A rebase is never required in Git. (people/maintainers may disagre) but a merge will always do.

Having said that. In your scenario provided, a pull + merge/rebase will be required. It will then resolve automatically, and without conflicts. But a human has to be involved to provide a strict sequence/dag of the those commits.
California EV sales are falling. Is it temporary or a threat to climate goals?
Gemma Is Added to Llama.cpp
It's ironic but actually follows their business interests.

Microsoft & google have large cloud divisions that benefit from open models. The lower the cost of AI models, the more they get run and the greater the cloud spend.

Meta is a consumer of AI. They themselves want cheap and effective AI for targeting adverts and building metaverses.

A loose analogy is that both oil producers and car companies want refining to be cheap.
I think this is a very different kind of thing. IIUC:

With Air Canada, the question is whether or not a chat bot can be treated as a company representative that makes binding commitments.

With the British Post Office, the issue is whether or not a software system is inscrutable during legal proceedings.
Plan 9 does so very much right. On Linux, namespaces are a mess of complexity which waited for Docker to make them usable; on Plan 9, a container runtime is basically a shell script.

I suspect that Plan 9 would be a more stable underlying OS for many places where Linux is used today, to include Android. I don’t know if it would be as efficient, but I really do question how much more important efficiency is than simplicity and correctness.
If only someone was doing research on neurodiverse behavioural traits. Maybe try to identify people displaying those traits and put them into simulations of conditions that we think prehistoric humans lived in.
Yeah obviously you can use Remix at Vercel as well, but since Vercel is the company behind Next.js I would think you will probably have a better time using Next.js with Vercel.

Altough, I have never used Vercel so that was just an assumption from my part. From my understanding though, they make it really easy to host Next.js apps with Vercel.

I guess the good part of using Remix if you use Vercel is that when they pull the rug from beneath you, you can always switch to another hosting provider.
Mistral Instruct v0.2 is 32K.
The physical watch is 2 years old, the software isn't.

I wonder if there's a legal argument that the warranty period resets after a software update.
This is a dangerous road to travel, as the exact same thing can be said about most other tools that can be abused. Knee-jerk reactions like this are shortsightedly ignorant and do nothing to mitigate actual harm being done.

Flipper zero’s capability is not based on some super advanced technology, it can be replicated. Banning stuff is an easy way to cover the problem up but instead of actually fixing anything, it is sent out of view of the mainstream and into shallow obscurity.

People who steal cars already break the law, breaking an extra one by possessing the tool is not going to be a deterrent. Researchers and security auditors who stay above board will no longer have access to this tool if they expect to exist in a professional capacity, effectively kneecapping their ability as our allies to help us create more secure systems.
Startups with Creators as Co-Founders?
I will never, ever keep a car I care about outside anywhere near the city.

I know everyone doesn't have the funds for that, but I'm sorry, we all know how rampant car thefts have gotten since before those 3 Q50s in this video were even purchased. I live in the busiest neighborhood in downtown Denver with which has rampant property theft, cats cut out etc non-stop.

I own 2 vehicles and neither of them are ever parked outside if I can help it. It means I have to pay pretty much twice for rent because now I need a 1-2 car private garage, which means I'm probably now in a condo or townhouse so every expense just gets higher and higher.

But you're in the bracket of living downtown with a brand new Q50. So I don't care what your excuse is, buying a luxury/attention-getter car and parking it outside in cities with rampant car thefts is just absolutely stupid.

Especially the people who buy the $80k luxu-box with the $5k 22" wheel add-on that gets ripped out of their mid-rise apartment parking garage a day later.

I've had a car stolen and insurance does NOT treat you well when it happens and I never, ever want to deal with having a car stolen again no matter how much gaap/etc. I have.
Hi, what is the cutoff date ?
That's what aliases are for. Regardless, I'm surprised that you even notice which hand you're typing with. For example, the word 'regardless' is mostly on my left hand and I'm right handed. But I wouldn't have noticed it if I didn't go looking for such words.
I agree, but that brings us back to my original question: why can't same smart organized crime people unlock my smartphone then? Because Apple/Google give a damn about security and car manufacturers do not.
Anyone know of other languages using pattern matching as a foundation?

I’ve come across Refal[1], who’s creator Valentin Turchin seems like someone who hasn’t gotten the recognition he maybe deserves. As an aside, his son Peter Turchin does some interesting work in a different direction that’s def topical these days.

I know SNOBOL gets labeled as one.

Would Prolog count? I haven’t actually written any myself. They def make a strong appearance in Erlang, though it isn’t the first thing that comes to mind if describing. There’s XSLT of course.

Any others?

I think if one were only able to pick one metaphor for a language, I think a strong case could be made for:

pattern => behavior

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refal
Adblockers almost axed our launch
cots tablets have cameras that are adequate for barcode reading, why increase the bom needlessly?
In this they're like google search. They have to give you some answer.

Google gives you completely unrelated results, while the LLMs just make something up.

Twice in the past weeks I tried both ChatGPT and Gemini for a technical question. The true answer was "you can't do it"/"those devices don't have the feature you're asking about". In both cases they made up some answers that looked consistent but were completely bogus.
> Instead of discussing how car theft is fundamentally an unethical behavior

What's to discuss? Is there any ambiguity about whether stealing cars is unethical? What are you bringing to that conversation that moves us forward?
A couple of key points that stood out to me:

1. ADHD traits could have been beneficial for exploring new food sources in ancient times.
2. While ADHD is often seen as a disorder today, it might be better suited to different environments.

Intriguing stuff about ADHD traits maybe being helpful in some situations! Makes me rethink how I view ADHD, and chimes with my own experience of folks with ADHD doing really well in certain tasks compared to others. A good reminder to consider different perspectives.

I also learnt that the DRD4/7R gene was linked to ADHD AND risk-taking behaviour.
This probably became cheaper and simpler to put a camera than a real code bar scanner.
For the vast majority of OSS projects, you're much better off using Git and GitHub in terms of drawing attention and attracting contributors.
false advertising and fraud are already banned. car theft is banned. cars below a certain price are effectively banned by regulations. poorly lit parking lots are almost certainly partially banned. soon, leaving one's car in a dark parking lot will be banned.
I think the parent is saying you don't need any third-party apps anymore, it's just built in to macos now.
> repoructive

Scooby?
It makes a ton of sense when you consider that it's cheaper to buy a freight train full of cheap Android tablets with front-facing cameras than it is to engineer a custom device with a camera that faces downwards.
If someone is stealing cars at 12 or 13 years old, they're already well on their way down the path towards irredeemability. Society has to do something or they will turn into a lifelong criminal. A multi-year prison sentence is probably not going to help them, but counseling, a better home and school environment, food in the belly, and so on might. You have to do something besides "catch and release" which has been the default in the USA for some time.
Not sure about Western world as a whole here. Some countries do not have such hard separation between church and state, but governing parties with clear religious affiliation, constitutions referencing God, religious holidays with bans on certain activities, etc.
TSMC itself relies on lithography tooling coming from the west. I get people want the western world to be wrong here but they have the edge and China doesn’t. It’s going to take them awhile to catch up and by that point the west will have innovated in new ways. China overplayed its hand way to early and will suffer technologically for this.
So they enter a secure facility with their already vetted credentials and CCTV in operation to try out stolen credit cards? Or they could do those same validation tests at home on a dodgy website.

Do you think using stolen credit cards is a big problem in Amazon warehouses, because what I think is this isn't a bug but a feature to detect who is working and who is slacking.
Fair enough; that was more directed at LLaMA and derivatives, which have commercial restrictions.
"I'd like to die on Mars, just not on impact."

Elon Musk, in his 2013 keynote address at SXSW
You can just say "I have no defense of my statement" instead of acting like I'm the one out of line. You claimed religious norms are a course in ethics, I provided counter examples. Try and do better.
Fair point. It may have more to do with Anglo or American culture than with the West at large, although I think the same deeper trends are still at play.
The high cost of return to office mandates
Yeah, caffeine makes it suspect. I have seen plenty of complex supplements that have a dose of one or more stimulants (back in the day they were giving out free doses of the original Jack3D with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methylhexanamine)

I also have my concerns about "adaptogens", I tried

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withania_somnifera

a few times and felt it was a lot like taking a Valium: both are relaxing and .relieve anxiety and both can make you clumsy and stupid. I think the ratio is a lot more favorable for Valium vs Ashwagandha.

That Latin name sounds suspicious, as if taking a large dose would produce the same pseudo-sleep produced by a large dose of Valium (amnesia, such that the person who took it thought they were asleep, an observer thinks the person is asleep, but the brain waves are completely different from sleep)

I looked in PubMed and found no talk about overdose of that stuff, it must be very rare for a case to turn up at a university medical center.
Narcissism is a tangential trait, but yeah.

It's about how customers were conditioned as children, and self selection of customers + how they deal with it. Similar to littering.

If people were taught/shown that it's okay to litter, most will litter.

If people were taught/shown that it's not okay to litter, most will have various strategies re: litter.

If they learned they could not litter in the first place and be 'good' and get benefits for it, they will probably do that. (they got praised appropriately for good behavior, and when they did bad behavior they got caught early, or had no excuses anyone would believe, and couldn't get away with lying).

If they grew up around a bunch of litterers and hated the people they grew up around for whatever reason, they will probably compulsively not litter even if no one cares - and pick fights with litterers. Or litter and hate themselves (which also correlates with NPD).

If they learned they could litter, and if caught could (successfully) pick it up and apologize, they will probably do that.

If they learned they could litter, and if caught could pretend they didn't know what was going on, or that it was wrong, pick it up, and then continue doing it, they will probably do that.

If they learned they could litter, and if caught they could pretend they couldn't figure out how to pick up litter, and someone else would pick it up for them, they will probably do that.

If they learned they could litter, and if caught they could successfully lie about it/blame someone else/get someone else to take the blame/gaslight people (that's not litter!), that's narcissism in many cases. If it's NPD, they'll also probably attack anyone who calls them out, as a survival mechanism, just maybe not directly.

Someone could also be a psychopath/sociopath in some cases, with different predicted results if they get caught or think there is someone who could get them in trouble if caught - like being directly attacked if you confront them about it, or being sabotaged/machiavellian'd out, getting themselves appointed onto a litter fine enforcing crew, etc.
Good point. There's more accountability on both sides if everyone is aware of the recording.
I’m suggesting that Japan would prefer a higher degree of control and independence on semiconductor supply chain in general, to hedge against external factors like sanctions. I did not mean to imply that US would sanction them but US sanctions on equipment to China led to losses for Japanese firms.

Having a deeper control of end to end semiconductor supply chain will help hedge against that, equipment sanction revenue loss can be made up by chips fab revenue as such. Makes more sense when you look at it from the government perspective, it is the government driving this despite how it appears.
Llama and gemma aren't actually open source? Since the licences are too restrictive. Not sure about the rest.
I assume that it's because people are still struggling to move away from 8.3 filenames (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8.3_filename).
I disagree. If just expecting good outcomes worked, why would we have any laws at all?

Before we had laws on child labor, we had children working and falling into heavy machinery. Before we had laws on food quality, you had to guess which milk provider was going to give you the least amount of formaldehyde poison. Before we had laws enforcing civil rights, over half the adult population in the US was disenfranchised. Was Western society exhausted at enforcing religious/ethical norms back then or is it just a recent thing?

Using the "social contract" theory for why governments and countries exist, you could say that we don't need laws until we do. Once an undocumented part of the social contract (e.g. ethical or religious norm) is no longer sufficient to maintain the integrity of the contract, it must be written down and enforced via government as a last measure. I do expect my car manufacturer to sell me a car which is relatively secure. If they are failing to meet that expectation from society, then it falls to that last measure to enforce compliance with that norm. Laws are also often used to add clarify where there is ambiguity. Different cultures and religions have different norms. If those norms conflict (does the gender of my partner matter in a marriage?), it falls to law to clarify.

It's a fair debate about how much guardrails should we put in. There's likely value in allow kids to hurt themselves as long as they aren't at risk of being permanently maimed or dying. It's a fair debate to discuss the root causes of criminal behavior, be it the issues with modern religion or systemic issues which prevent people from successfully participating in mainstream society and the economic opportunity therein. However, there is no value in allowing easily stolen vehicles (a good which has been regulated for almost a century) to be sold, where they can then be used to enable other crimes.
Banning Flipper in an effort to prevent car theft is like banning blank keys in an effort to prevent burglaries.
Great - and how is that different from the law again?
As someone who has had employees steal thousands of dollars in expensive specialized tools, I can tell you that people do behave badly behind closed doors and will lie to your face when confronted.

For example, around 15 years ago we had these guys steal multiple crimpers ($400 to $800 ea.), CNC cutting tools ($100 to $400 ea.) and accessories in the thousands of dollars. Even seemingly stupid things, like 300 meter rolls of wire.

We brought them into the conference room and confronted them with the situation by saying: We know you stole these items (presented a list). If you return them within the next couple of days you will be fired and no charges will be filed.

They lied, said they did not steal a thing and were offended by the false accusation.

We then played the surveillance videos on the conference room screen. Their tune changed dramatically to admitting what they did and asking forgiveness. Of course, this entire meeting was also recorded.

They were given one opportunity to not lie, return what they stole and be fired. Instead, they were arrested.

When you are working for a company, privacy isn't to be expected outside of the bathrooms.

There are other issues as well. It is really unfortunate that, as a business owner, you are forced to think defensively in these matters. It really is. I am a firm believer in that people are basically good. Mainly because behaving badly in person (let's not talk about online, that's a different matter) can have serious consequences.

In that category if you hire women --no reason not to-- you better have security cameras everywhere allowed by law. Why? Because of two things. First, women can be subject to serious sexual harassment. This has to be taken seriously and acted upon. Second, a woman can falsely acuse someone at work of this and absolutely ruin their lives. Video surveillance, if thorough enough, should provide one of the requisite safety layer.

Of course, employees have to be made aware of these policies. I don't know if it is a legal requirement (it might be in some jurisdictions), it's the right thing to do.

Sadly, we have to use such measures just because of a very small number of idiots who don't seem to have a brain.
Agreed but there's nothing about this discussion that requires LLMs are the store for anything. That's an implementation detail. One that's not that controversial imo. The current tech is clearly too destructive to "store" anything.
Pijul also turns up easily on web searches, despite there being a bird with that name.
I'm not sure how to interpret that. I just found it a bit ironic to make a post about Microsoft "spying" while marketing Facebook/Twitter.
And was why low margins high skill work left for ASEAN, EU, Mexico, China, Japan, South Korea, Israel, India, etc since the 1980s.

You can see references to this even in early Simpsons (eg. Germans buying the nuclear plant or Japanese being viewed as god tier overworked manufacturers).
Former journalist here, so I may be biased, but I think a lot of people think of "the press" as if it's one thing, when in reality there is a vast, vast spectrum of quality across different news outlets. Unfortunately, as with other negative stereotypes, a few bad impressions is all it takes for some people to attribute those stereotypes to the whole group. But having spent time behind the scenes, I would say that most people who make journalism their profession really do try very hard to be accurate, especially when it comes to quoting people. Mistakes happen, yes, but aside from some bottom-feeders who don't care about accuracy as long as it sells, most of the journalists I know see theirs as a public-service profession. Certainly they're not in it for the money.
That still wouldn't mean that the merge is semantically correct.
> Security flaws are not born equal.

Absolutely. And let's bring risk into this.

Security risks are not born equal.

Serious security thinkers evaluate according to factors of likelihood,
impact, mitigation cost etc.

A car is a dangerous weapon, especially in the hands of a group of
giddy kids, maybe drunk or way too high to drive. The likelihood of
someone getting seriously injured or killed by joyriding is high.
It's really high. And there's no mitigation to a dead child. The
penalty? A very firm "please don't do that again!"

But then a kid like Aaron Swartz downloads some files and gets nine
felony counts totalling 50 years in jail and a $1 million fine.

A justice system with these values has no concept of risk and
proportionality and is beneath contempt.
For me it was self-exploration and exploring the fringes of my identity using psychedelics and other drugs that my parents didn't particularly approve of. For some of my friends it was sexual identity (which was much more taboo than today). In general I think "rebellion" is the consequence of becoming a fully aware individual capable of independence from parents. Parents want to exert control over their teens, teens want to have agency over their lives, and the conflict between those two positions is framed as "rebellion".
Disney Reportedly Strikes Deal for Sony to Take over Its Physical Media Business
Don't forget AMD's even weirder and rarer ARM chip: https://www.theregister.com/2016/01/14/amd_arm_seattle_launc... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opteron#A1100-series
Funny, I also only googled it myself and it was loading just a few hours ago.

Anyway, the first product I'm aware of supporting a battery cycle-life of 800 was the LG Optimus G in 2012, with a battery from LG Chem
For me, Signal is so much better for my friend or work group chats. My friends are on a mix of devices and platforms, and Signal is a lot nicer for embedded media sharing. And the auto disappearing feature is a must!
They have already announced they will add support for RCS this year (https://9to5mac.com/2023/11/16/apple-rcs-coming-to-iphone/), so not exactly a protocol released 32 years ago. It’s probably coming in iOS 18

Still unencrypted though, because the RCS standard does not include encryption.
Why do you think it's older? XL started as LX around 1993, and IIRC self-compiled in 2004 or so.
> But we cannot blame software itself, right?

If we can blame easy access to guns for the rise in mass shootings then we absolutely can and should blame easy access to Excel for the rise in MBA's completely fucking up companies.
clicking the link all the text seems to restyle multiple times - the fontsize seems to flash 'bigger' at least twice before settling. looks very unsettling.
People don't want their cars stolen. Punishing the thieves doesn't undo their actions.
I am pointing out that the response to this problem isn’t, “Hey, there is a cultural problem with society finding this acceptable” and is instead “how can we re-engineer things to prevent this?”
Singular Value Decomposition as Simply as Possible
> huge loss/fraud prevention value

in a company owned cafeteria, for ordinary pay-per-purchase coffee ?

where is the "loss" ?

better question - is management addicted to spying here?
I'm glad someone said it out loud.