skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is just circumstantial and possibly biased based on the kinds of people I personally encounter, but it seems like at least 1/3rd if not 1/2 of the people I meet claim to have ADHD or be "neurodivergent". If such a large percentage of people had ADHD then it sounds like that is just neurotypical at this point.

Maybe almost everyone experiences similar symptoms to varying degrees and almost nobody gets tested because it doesn't cause them any problems.
It is. A piece of trivia: AFAIR, you say

SUM 2 3

in Logo to add two numbers, but

[SUM 2 3 4]

to add more. (Though I learned Logo more than three decades ago, so I might be mistaken.)
It was made available to Apple.
I observed the same, especially with recent abortion movements (from what I heard those were also in USA and I'm assuming from what I saw on internet, it look similar to what is happening in my country)

I believe that car thieft could be exactly the same.

basically people behave like legal abortion means that women will have to perform it and that's bad.
especially I hear that from religious people that they don't approve such actions in their religion.
the thing that I don't get is that religious people should not perform abortion even when it's legal, so they should not care about legalizing

this is the same, you can buy knife in any store and it's legal, but this could be used to murder someone
isn't that basically the same?
I don't remember that happening, I think I wasn't watching the news much during that period in my life. But I did hear about it in past year after reading Quinn's books and following some mental threads afterwards. Wild that you had conversations with him!

Unfortunate people take ideas so far... we are so sure we are right.
> I don't know anything about these OBD port locks, but I don't see any reason they'd have a master key

Look at it in the picture and the review pictures. They're all 'keyed' alike. It's just a single offset pin. Also one review says it just holds on with friction and can be pulled off with force.
They mean FPGAs I guess? They're certainly flexible but incredibly expensive for almost any purpose where a general purpose CPU or GPU could also get the job done, and incredibly expensive compared to a mass produced ASIC that does the same thing, so they're always going to be a niche thing mainly for expensive low volume products.
EVs that go 1,000km on a single charge: Gel makes it possible
One strategy is to store the model version used for each vector, and then using the appropriate model to embed your queries. Of course that means that for a certain time frame you may need to blend two result sets, so that may not be ideal for your use case. You could also choose to just re-embed the last 90 days or so, or in your case on a project by project basis. Of course all of this raises your search complexity because you need to track your model versions.

From a vector store side we have worked with Weaviate, Qdrant, Pinecone, Milvus, and Elasticsearch. All of them had their pros and cons, and none of them were as stable as we liked once you really went to scale. Cloud deployments were rather pricey as well at that volume. We ended up with a mix of Qdrant Weaviate and Elastic for different workloads.
B.C. is no where as special as Quebec. The province of B.C. has never held a referendum to split. It does not have a special language police. Nor does it call itself a country :)
What's with the dummy github page? Anyway. This feels like the right step forward. Just like OpenAI, i have near religious faith in the transformers architecture. The question is how these modalities can work together better.
I mean … probably depends on local preferences. Every project I've ever worked on used .yaml.

.yml feels like .htm to me. DOS is long since gone.

But, Github seems to think they're about the same, with a lead for .yml: 23.9M hits for .yml, 17.8M for .yaml.
I'm fully in agreement; we have policies around warrants, etc that have been long-running and should in general treat the government as a quasi-malicious actor.

However, just because the government forces something for them doesn't mean we should just give up entirely for everything - the fact that the government knows your SIM purchase doesn't mean that random users on HN should be able to find it.
Its like 12%; certainly not a majority.
Imagine you are working on a patch heavy project. Like the Linux kernel. Where there are a lot of patchsets going around that are not in the mainline.

You and I, who are both working off of main, and who have both separate merged in a few patchsets that are relevant to our shared module of interest. We can merge and compare our branches, and the differences in terms of nursing patches without having to be rigorous about reconciling or histories.
Theology warning:

> "the replacement of ethical expectations with specific, written down laws"

There are two things that are simultaneously true.

1) This law is not a replacement of ethical expectations, but a poor attempt to codify them.

2) This law is bad on it's own right, and the website is correct.

But I would like to discuss point 1. In an interesting way, you are making the precisely the same error of the people who are proposing to ban Flipper Zero's, just on the other side of the coin.

The anti-F0 people think "If we do away with this tool, car thieves will cease to exist! Since car thieves are otherwise good people, when we remove the tools, they will cease to be thieves!"

You think, "Such people will still exist, we just need to make sure they understand our ethical expectations! Since car thieves are otherwise good people, when we teach them not to steal, they will cease to be thieves!"

> we tend to assume they [people] will behave in the worst way possible

Because they do. The depravity of man is at once the most empirically verifiable fact, and they most intellectually resisted. If you make F0's illegal to own, criminals will still own them. If you "educate" them that this is bad behavior, they will laugh and nod their head. "Why do you think we do this at night?"

Now, your attribution to relativism and cultural exhaustion with regards to religious and ethical norms is SPOT ON! I absolutely agree. But what you will find, if you return to religious instruction, is that Christianity teaches that people behave in the worst way possible. Regardless of education, regardless of law: the human nature is sinful from birth.

The heart is deceitful above all things and beyond cure. Who can understand it? - Jeremiah 17:9
thanks for the suggestion :) We'll definitely add support for other languages
I agree this is a potential outcome. One big question is generalizability versus niche models. For example, is the best legal model a frontier model + a giant context window + RAG? Or is it a niche model trained or fine tuned for law?

Right now at least people seem to decouple some measures of how smart the model is from knowledge base, and at least for now the really big models seem smartest. So part of the question is well is how insightful / synthesis centric the model needs to be versus effectively doing regressions....
Because the law is only punishing people that break the rules, not teaching them what ethical behavior is in the first place. It’s fundamentally a reactive process.

In other words, you want people that don’t steal cars because they feel bad about it. You don’t want them to not steal cars because they’re afraid of the law.
I have a problem with their test for ADHD - two things. One, it's a 6 question test. Pretty limited.

Two, the test diagnosed half of the participants as having the equivalent of clinical diagnosis of ADHD, when the global diagnosis rate is closer to 5%. Huge red flag.

They used a black box AI tool to diagnose folks. IMO, this was a bad choice for a study.
I think "neurodivergent" mostly means autistic.
Hmm… Does signal only really work when everyone uses it? Or can you include people who are just using regular SMS?
Average Salary in the U.S. in 2024
The Pentagon Is Missing Comprehensive War-Crime Reports
You wrote:

> Yes but that would have meant giving up sales in exchange for actually backing up their words.

What word did they not back up with respect to iMessage? When did they ever say they'd open it up?
"The protocol has been extended" has been XMPP's theme for decades, and also its problem. Name your favorite client, it probably won't have several extensions, and a lot of useful things require support on both ends plus the server. Lots of things that should be ubiquitous are not, including s2s auth. There needed to be more structure, like AIM back then or Signal now. Also the XML stuff is a nightmare.

Even if Google Talk kept XMPP, they weren't going to save it, cause nobody used Google Talk. Facebook was by far the biggest XMPP-supported platform (though it wasn't federated), and they stopped probably cause they didn't see enough clients. Even Slack supported XMPP for a while, did you use that?
I finally ran into the "on" bug just last month with github workflows: the default .yml file github writes has an unquoted `on` as a key to a dictionary, and pyyaml "correctly" interprets that as `True`.

I can imagine this would have been baffling if I hadn't read about it before. There wasn't actually an elegant solution, but replacing `\n on:` with `\n "on":` was an acceptable hack that took two minutes.
USA crime is still very low compared to pretty much the entire 20th century, it seems early to proclaim certain approaches as a failure.

FWIW, catalytic converter theft was recently a big problem in the US and the classic approach of getting the FBI involved, identifying the high-level fencers and arresting, was incredibly effective and cat thefts have plummeted.

I suspect disrupting the organized crime in Canada would work similarly well at reducing car theft.
I worked on several integration attempts between Apple and Google.

They often presented specs that clearly showed security holes then simply would deny they were there or say “that’s secure”. It was a truly wild experience.
there is a lot of ambiguity about it in places like san francisco. better to lock up the deoderant than lock up a human being, the logic goes
The 7 nm uses (older) ASLM machines.
Download the CSVs of https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/homicide-rate-unodc
and https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/prison-population-rate

Plot them on a graph. There is basically no correlation.
> Shintoism even puts a spiritual component to „cleanness“

Isn't this typical of many (most?) religions? "Cleanliness is next to godliness" is a common idea in Christendom.
GPT4All?
Could you give an example of these datasets?
No. Windows balance a variety of competing needs - security, ventilation, egress during emergencies, mental health, lighting, etc. It would be, perhaps, egregiously negligent for a maximum security prison architect to install large plate glass windows in their cells, but having windows isn't automatically egregious. A car without windows (or with unbreakable ones) is a deathtrap in an accident; omitting them would be egregiously dangerous.

The same isn't true for, say, Kia/Hyundai's decision not to include immobilizers:

https://www.ctvnews.ca/autos/kia-and-hyundai-vehicles-in-can...

> CNN reported that only 26 per cent of Hyundai and Kia models from 2015 to 2019 were equipped with electronic immobilizers in the U.S., compared with 96 per cent of all other vehicles in those years, making the Hyundai and Kia models roughly twice as likely to be stolen.

Those stats make it pretty clear that immobilization was already the industry standard. Skipping them was like knowingly writing open SQL injection holes in a web application.
Hopefully it returned a 418 to anyone attempting to use it for snooping.
I wonder if the curl people are giving this more attention than it deserves.

I’ve reported (and fixed) a number of security issues over the years. Sometimes I get them CVE numbers. I’ve never believed that MITRE or NVD added the slightest bit of value in their analyses.

The whole industry should recognize that CVEs are just a number. They are not, in and of themselves, worthy of entries on resumes, use in academic analyses, or much else. They simply identify an issue that may or may not be a security issue. There is an entire industry (of distros, etc) that triage issues and maybe deploy fixes, and for better or for worse that industry often requires a CVE number for its internal tracking.

So assigning a CVE number in general seems about as meaningful as assigning any other string. If I say “FOOBAR-12345: I don’t like how ‘curl’ is spelled”, then that means about what it sounds like, that is, not much.
See the code around here to answer that question:

Definition of 'if' statement:
https://github.com/c3d/xl/blob/fast/src/builtins.xl#L155

// If-then-else statement
if [[true]] then True else False is True
if [[false]] then True else False is False

if [[true]] then True is True
if [[false]] then True is false

Definition of loops (https://github.com/c3d/xl/blob/fast/src/builtins.xl#L222)

// Loops
while Condition loop Body is
if Condition then
Body
while Condition loop Body
until Condition loop Body is { while not Condition loop Body }
loop Body is { Body; loop Body }
for Var in Low..High loop Body is
Var := Low
while Var < High loop
Body
Var := Var + 1
This is like the jump to conclusions map in Office Space. This is a horrible idea at the expense of users.
This is exactly it - the number of "high-end" devices that have things like that inside would boggle the mind.

Perhaps the most famous: https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2017/9/21/16339122/e...
You don't really need to trust. For significant amounts of value, a multi-sig setup using a number of different devices means that _all_ the devices could be compromised, but providing they are not compromised by the same attacker your bitcoin is still safe.
Where would you put Lua on this spectrum?

Also, I do not find Lisp unreadable - you train your brain to ignore the parens and look at the indentation instead pretty quickly. And you can always tell Emacs to gray out the parens if you really want. ;-)
I'm watching this (and Jujitsu, Sapling, etc.) with interest, but I wish there was more focus on Git's real weak areas. Yes it sometimes makes merge conflicts more difficult than it could, but you can generally deal with that. The bigger problems are:

* Poor support for large/binary files. LFS is bare-minimum proof of concept.

* Poor support for large projects. Big monorepo support is definitely getting better thanks to Microsoft. Submodules are a disaster though.

How does Pijul support large files and large projects?
I don't really understand why generative LLM output is being presented to (and interpreted by) users as intelligence. This seems incredibly disingenuous, and I would prefer to see it characterized as as fiction, creative, realism, etc. -- words that make it clear to average people that while this might be entertaining and even mimicking reality, it's completely distinct from the writing of a person. Disclaimers (often small, low contrast, or "ToS;DR"-esque) are insufficient when the UI is specifically crafted to appear like chatting with a person.
The largest metro area on the planet, Tokyo, 34 million people, is also the one of the safest with the extremely low crime. Seoul, and Singapore are both around 10 million and are also safe with low crime.
Hi,

thanks for this nice App. Will have a look at it.

There is another cool app coming up. It's called FMail2 http://fmail-app.fr

Maybe it's also interesting to compare it. Just to let you know about.
They clearly don’t think so, if I ask it to give me the first few paragraphs of the first Harry Potter it starts to give a dump and then fails saying it can’t give that info. Clearly it’s trained on the book and its creators belief outputting this is iffy.
> basically people behave like legal abortion means that women will have to perform it and that's bad

So let me get this straight: you're suggesting that because abortion may be legalized at a federal level that religious people are upset because women will "have to perform it"? And this is your broad stroke assumption of why people are upset?

Not to derail the thread but you just made a wild statement to me and I want to ensure you're saying what I think you're saying.
When did they change that? I believe viewing share links didn’t require an account originally.
Honestly this whole RSC/app router endeavour just seems like a mistake. So many strange buggy and undebuggable behaviours. To what end? We have a basic SSR React app and it serves millions of users while cached by Cloudflare. Works perfectly.

KISS.
Sorry - you edited your comment substantially, the process you initially described was identical to the law.
Good point. Could be nice if the origins of things could be traced.

Especially quotes since the big thing became a random quote against a black and white photo of a random famous person,so proper attribution is near impossible.
Could you elaborate on how OptaPlanner/Timefold wasn't ergonomic?

I 'd love to understand this better, so we can improve it in Timefold Community.
To help deal with new problems, we're creating out-of-the-box quickstarts for common use cases:
https://github.com/TimefoldAI/timefold-quickstarts

As for the Community/Enterprise split - we want to continue the open source project, but we need to eat too :)

Geoffrey (Timefold co-founder / OptaPlanner creator)
FaceTime is definitely true. I've used it.
Sounds like the whole freegnix/nginx thing is farther reaching than just that project.

Many were questioning why he chose that particular hill to die on and I think article answers that question. It's a general problem and SOME CVE related hill needs to be chosen.
There is little or no consequence in America to breaking the law - especially for those who have nothing to lose
I’m talking about the organized crime problem, not the thing you brought up. BC has a problem with organized crime in its ports.
Indeed, hidden switch on a circuit somewhere and away you don’t go!
You have not seen the worst. Here are a couple of things from the last three months:

- I had to argue with a Junior Developer about a non existing AWS API, that ChatGPT hallucinated on this code.

- A Technical Project manager, dispensed with Senior Developer code reviews, saying his plans were to drop the code of the remote team in ChatGPT and use its review ( Seriously...)

- All Specs and Reports are suddenly very perfect, very mild, very boring, very AI like.
I suspect if you had brought them one by one into the room the result might have been different. But perhaps it was an entire gang.

It's so common it's a 20 year old joke at least: https://www.amazon.com/Build-Better-Stealing-Office-Supplies...
There are limitations to what you can get with spending limit accounts, but Azure has (always?) had more options for people looking for hard billing caps than the other two big providers.

While you can footgun yourself with hard limits I tend to think that learners/hobbyists should, in general, be able to access at least many services with an ironclad guarantee that they can't be billed for over a certain monthly amount or a total number.

I'm much more inclined to shrug if a startup screws themselves over with a hard spending limit than if a student screws themselves over because of a lack of one.
I hope there can be some reasonable middle ground. I think in this case it's good the woman got her money. But Air Canada, presumably scared of what the next case might cost them decided to turn the chat bot off entirely. I think that's a bit unfortunate.

I don't know what the solution looks like. Maybe some combination of courts only upholding "reasonable" claims by AI. And then insurance to cover the gaps?
I'd wager the vast majority of Linux users have never encountered a memory safety issue with the Kernel. Memory safety issues are usually rare enough in world class C code that, by the time it reaches end-users, you have to actively go out of your way to exploit it.

Rust built its reputation around the idea that they can crush security bugs by making them impossible. They should be holding themselves to a higher standard than that "in practice" leeway. If a malicious actor can tease Rust into behaving in a way that contradicts its safety guarantees, then it could be serious.

Maybe your corporate policy is to configure Rust to allow zero unsafe code. Some crate you're depending on gets hijacked. It uses the cve-rs to crash your system even though Rust says it's 100% safe code.
Text directions in scripts around the world
If insurance pays out often enough that this might actually work as a sales tactic, they don't get another sale, everyone goes to another manufacturer because insurance is so expensive.

Also most car dealers make more profit from ongoing maintenance and servicing than selling you a new car.
> a noticeable trend to me is what I'll call "the replacement of ethical expectations with specific, written down laws."

That seems silly. Previous generations were far more likely to ban random things they didn't like vs. trusting to "ethical expectations". Prohibition? Sedition laws? Segregation? "Papers please"? Even something as comparatively benign as the Steve Jackson Games raid wouldn't happen today. Things are getting inexorably better and not worse in essentially every democracy in the world.

In fact, a noticeable trend I've noticed is one where sheltered geeks in privileged careers tend to take infringement on their personal hobbies as a general problem with society and not just a minor blip in the forest of liberty.
I don't think you can paint MBA-ification as a leftist phenomenon.
I tried the demo, and it got confused and disconnected, but it's a cool proof of concept. Suggest bumping up the happiness emotion on the agent, and a Calendly integration would immediately unlock a lot of use cases. Good luck!
HTML smuggling: How malicious actors use JavaScript/HTML to fly under the radar
U.S. Warns Allies Russia Could Put a Nuclear Weapon into Orbit This Year
> because it doesn't cause them any problems.

Yes, this is the defining line of a clinical diagnosis: are the symptoms inhibiting your ability to live.

You'll also see similar claims around depression, OCD, and any other mental disorder. Since the disability is not visible, people regularly dismiss them using the same "everybody is a little ADHD" rhetoric.
I think the easy read is that the machine is a commercial machine that can be deployed in places where the functionality is needed. That is, this is not a custom machine for this location. (The story states that the coffee is free in this location.)
Forget about digital experiences for a moment. Forget entirely about chatbots.

> Air Canada argues it cannot be held liable for information provided by one of its agents, servants, or representatives

That includes EMPLOYEES. So they tried to argue that their employees can lie to your face to get you to buy a ticket under false pretense and then refuse to honor the promised terms? That's absolutely fucked.
The seemingly poor quality of this "study" aside, the whole "ADHD is ackshually a superpower" movement over the last few years is really frustrating for me, especially hearing it from people who "suffer" from it. There's a broad spectrum of symptoms with varying severities for sure, but for me, I can definitely point to it as the number one thing that has adversely affected the quality and trajectory of my life, and I'd do pretty much anything to be rid of it. It's very hard to explain to people who do not deal with it, even the people that are like "oh actually it makes me super special and productive in X scenario." Cool. Good for you. For many people it's completely debilitating. I'm one of the luckier ones that fell into a career that suits my natural tendencies, and have trained myself to overcome disadvantages, but go visit an ADHD support group sometime online. It's truly heartbreaking to hear the stories.