skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
They were always the most likely buyer if you were paying attention.

I admit to being pretty disappointed at the confirmation though. Blue Origin would of done just fine without this merger and 3+ companies competing for US space launches instead of 2 would of been healthier.

Maybe Tony Bruno will launch his own space company? I always thought Boeing and Lockheed were holding him back.
While I agree with your point and I think you're right, let's remember that part of the issue is Apple.

Might be worth reading this comment from the devs[0]. I wish the feature existed too, but I get it and don't think all blame is on them. For lost devices, well... is that a bug? Where would the backup come from? Signal is anti-cloud, as they should be.

BUT, I do think people store too much data. Pictures, messages, etc. I think we're getting very little value for maintaining all of this and that it is mostly laziness. Don't get me wrong, I do it too and I like it and it does come in handy time to time, but my life wouldn't significantly change were this not the case. It's something I'll be irked about when I hit the speed bump the first time but move on quickly (like quitting Facebook). 99.999% of the time it would just result in me asking someone about something months ago and it's never been anything important (because if it was, I'd have made that information redundant, and that's not a action because Signal, that's an action because the information is important and I do this wherever that type of info comes from.) Truth is that >>99.9% of that data is junk. It's only the nuggets we care about and I think it's a bit weird we treat it all the same.

[0] https://community.signalusers.org/t/ios-backup-keeping-messa...
Another rather useful use of `cat` is to make the input stream appear in a specific location withing another stream. e.g. My website [1] maker [2] uses `cat -` to inject content into templates.

shite_template_common_default_page() {
cat <<EOF |
$(shite_template_common_header)
<main id="main">
$(cat -)
</main>
EOF
shite_template_standard_page_wrapper
}

[1] https://evalapply.org

[2] https://github.com/adityaathalye/shite?tab=readme-ov-file#te...
what is the cost of analyzing the proposed solution and fixing it so it does what you want and how does that compare to not using AI and writing the code yourself?
It seems to be doing it for all outputs that depict people, in any context.
I've heard that one. It was funny almost a year ago. Not so amusing now
We're talking about the same company who wanted to scan all your files you uploaded, right?
I also love places that are named after someone and it's slightly amusing/horrifying.

Harold Holt was the Australian Prime Minister in the 1960's, and went for a swim and went missing (yes, there are many, MANY local conspiracies this :)). So what did we do? Named a swimming pool[0] after him (construction actually started before his death, I believe).

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Holt_Memorial_Swimming_...
Unfortunately the hallucinations make it problematic. Yesterday I was working in a chart library I had never used and Copilot was adamant in convincing me to use non-existing methods. You can question it, but when it's backtracking you have no idea if you triggered it or if the information was wrong.

At least with practical implementations you can still verify the output through tests or trial and error but it becomes even more fragile when asking about facts or knowledge.
Fixed implies broken. If it hadn't blown up on Twitter and risked bad PR and stock prices dropping, it would still be there.

They had to hard code in that racist garbage. AI is just making the cognitive dissonance of the creators apparent. They hold that tolerance and inclusivity are more important than anything, but are then intolerant and excluding of certain groups because they are racists and bigots.

I'd also note that despite all the lecturing about not stereotyping, it spits out nothing but stereotypes. Ask for a Scottish person and see if you get someone NOT wearing a kilt. Ask for any group with a strong stereotype and see what happens. You get stereotypes for everything except a few stereotypes for a few specific groups where they've manually adjusted things.

We need to keep all the moral grandstanding out of the AI models. Not only is it bad for the tools (they aren't AGI and are completely subject to human input), but it makes lawsuits inevitable. This stuff isn't protected by section 230 either. If Google bakes racism or whatever into their model, they are liable. The only protection they can have is claiming they're like a piece of paper and ink where the artist can paint whatever they like. This goes out the window if the paper refuses to draw one group of people, but not others.
Saying rocks are conscious is a poor summary. It's more like adult human > human child > dolphin > dog > human infant > bird > snake > spider > ant > dust mite etc.

The whole thing is a continuum and everything is made of matter, so there's a little bit of potential consciousness in all matter.
> prove the existence of something that is other than the universe

I'm not sure. I think the proofs show some base entity that is needed to sustain the universe. But is it something apart from the universe? Whatever exists, say God and His creation, all together constitutes the universe. Of course by universe I mean the totality of reality that the proofs refer to.

Perhaps you mean that the something "other" always exists even though the universe might not have. As I say in the other comment, God might not have a choice in creating the universe, so this is an open question that cannot be discussed within the context of the proofs.
Somewhere along the way it had been so long since I used cat to concatenate files that I had to relearn to do so. That felt either very silly or, “I’ve forgotten more about X than you’ll ever know”

But probably the former.
Partly because analysts are learning their lesson in underestimating the AI demand and starting to correct for it.

The other complication is that we don't have intuitions for AI, so it's easy to underestimate how astronomically large the market will be.

And from an execution standpoint, Jensen (Nvidua CEO) has been preparing for a very long time (albeit unintentially, so nobody could predict AI to this extent). He also tends to go all-in on things, which has caused problems in the past (e.g. crypto crash), but just happened to be incredibly prescient in this moment.
Reddit in AI content licensing deal with Google, sources say
Yup, a Workspace user can ask Gemini to place an AI generated image directly into a corporate slide deck...

>Create images with AI in Google Slides

>https://support.google.com/docs/answer/13635180?hl=en
Minutes? More like seconds, tens of seconds at most; you can watch videos of them starting up on YouTube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jImib9Keio8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxUQw5vCDZs
guy is a fraud, Thief and deviant. why do you care? you going to give him your money again when he gets out? American Dream, Baby!
Cisco in 2000: Gross margin in fiscal 2000 was 64.4%, compared with 65.0% in fiscal 1999. The following table shows the standard
just to add some thoughts:

if we look at it, unless we get AI cracking jokes to an other AI, in the end someone want to have jokes written to be heard by an audience on a show.

Is this person the writer for the show, or will suddenly the CFO will fire the writer because it can generate some content with an LLM? It seems to me, this wont happen, we still need experts.

Maybe the expectation of the economics will change.

When excel or other spreadsheets came around, it did have an impact on the expectations from your accountant, because now no need to do the math on paper anymore, you can do more and more effectively, which lead over time to a renegotiation of the economics, but as far as I can tell, accountants haven't disappeared.
It's ironic that even the cultural left in US is not immune to American exceptionalism.
i didn't say they did! i said they need to take responsibility for their own safety/security or suffer the consequences. whether they should be expected to... is totally irrelevant. i'm not stating a preference, i'm stating a fundamental law of nature.

and not knowing even that simple fact is what makes it "deservedly" so.
Many people don't want second-hand cars
Sure. As we are salty about the price of Apple products. But how often do you buy this stuff?

Day in and day out, my bowl of Ramen is still 600 JPY.
My veggies come from Aomori and my Milk from Hokkaido. It's fine.

I work in a company that has 95% export and my salary is paid in EUR/JPY and USD (don't ask). So I actually benefit quite a bit. But your average Japanese citizen is just not that much affected. (Unless she buys a lot of imported goods).
Gotcha. GLR is painful to learn, you have my sympathy there. I feel like a big chunk of that is due to overly complex formalism and nomenclature around it, but it's definitely still tough, especially if you're trying to implement it efficiently. If you're interested in doing so, I recommend making sure you understand each of the following parsing algorithms in order: regexes via NFA, regexes via DFA, unambiguous LR(0) without empty productions and while ignoring time complexity, LR(0) with time complexity optimizations and with empty productions, LR(1), and then finally GLR (to handle ambiguity). The hardest part will probably be the LR(0) stage.

If you get stuck on LR(0), here's the idea: you use a state machine with a stack, and (b) treat nonterminal symbols like any other input tokens. How? Like below. Say you had the rules:

#1: Add: Add '+' NUMBER;
#2: Add: NUMBER;

Initially, you could be in the beginning of any of these rules: either in rule #1 offset 0 (before the Add), or in rule #2 offset 0 (before the NUMBER). Push ({(#1, 0), (#2, 0)}, <null>) onto your stack, where the second list is the symbols you've seen so far (nothing so far). Now consume the first token in the input; let's say it was a NUMBER (say, "55"). Go through every possible new location in your stack, and update where it could be now, and push the new candidate locations along with the symbol you just saw, filtering out any locations where you went past the end of the rule. In this case, that means pushing ({(#1, 1), (#2, 1)}, NUMBER). Now, carefully examine your stack. You've seen [<null>, NUMBER] so far (i.e., just [NUMBER]), and you're either in the middle of rule #1, or at the end of rule #2. Well, it can't be #1, because the last symbol you saw was NUMBER, not Add. Therefore it's #2, and you've finished rule #2, which means you've recognized an Add. Therefore, pop all the symbols in the production of #2 from the stack (which leaves the stack empty), then push the output back (i.e. "reduce" it to the Add symbol). This leaves you with a stack that has just one item, ({(#1, 1)}, Add). Since you're no longer at the end of a production, consume the next input symbol, then go repeat this process, reducing as much as you can every time before consuming an input. [1]

Once you understand this intuitively (and if you stare at it long enough, you'll realize the process I just explained resembles that of a regex NFA), then learn how to optimize this by preprocessing the set of possible locations into simple integers instead of entire sets, so you don't have to do O(|rules|) work every iteration. Then move onto LR(1), which is merely about disambiguating the rules using a lookahead. After that, GLR is "just" keeping a DAG instead of a stack (and it reduces to a linked-list version of a stack if there is no ambiguity)... best of luck.

[1] I lied a little here, in that the process starts with reducing, not shifting. Because you might need to reduce (possibly multiple times) before you consume any inputs. But that's easier to explain here after the fact, than when you're initially learning it.
A CFO knows which factors have a significant impact on the bottom line.
lol. high grade, yellow cake copium.

what happened to the tech start-ups of Adiivka? or Bakhmut?

oh yes, I remember. they Ded.

lol. Yanks. you pay the most but lose all the wars. what's that about?
maybe usefull as dirty bomb?
Stream of consciousness troubleshooting dies on the search page. Especially with ads.
why, exactly, are operating systems licensed in this asinine user-hostile way? Is it a monetary thing or something?
If you want to help, use your knowledge to help shape policy. Because it is coming/already happening, and it will shape your life even if you are just living a simple life. I guarantee you that your city and state governments are passing legislation to incorporate AI to affect your life if they can be sold on it in the name of "good".
"There Is No Alternative"? I had to consult ChatGPT to get that acronym explained.
Also looking for this answer. I think my blood hails from Northern Germany. Wild boar? I don’t know.
You speak as if Apple, the company that controls those cash reserves, is incapable of using those cash reserves, which is a strange thing to claim. It may not be a slush fund but it is obviously not untouchable.
Oh `F()`. I should use redirection more with my Bash functions, and add it to my list (pun intended) of functional tricks [1].

[1] https://evalapply.org/posts/shell-aint-a-bad-place-to-fp-par...
Be Playing with GPTs at Work
>Main Street in San Francisco was named after Charles Main.

I feel this might be a bit of a cheeky urban legend, or at the very least a coincidence.

"Main st" has been used in western city's and towns for a lot longer than SF has been around.
I think the greater point here is we need to change federal law if we want companies to not endlessly hoard cash and gouge their customers.
What is the difference to resource integrity and certificate pinning which is already implemented among every single Browser via the HSTS policies?

Also, do you really think meta's products will have static assets for eternity from the point of installing an extension? Absurdly unlikely.
Chaz spontaneously evolved into a Californian surfer dude at one point. This goes some way to neutralize the smugness of regular ChatGPT, it's a pretty good idea.
This is overall a good, and needed thing. While the BE-4 engines from Blue Origin are fantastic, they need the level of system maturity that is represented by ULA. Together, I see a real chance to be competitive with SpaceX long term. Yes, they have work to go before they could do reusable launch, but the combined company probably has the best chance to do so.

The more reusable launch providers the better for the industry and for human kind.
Organisations are starting to use LLMs in production with the aim to reduce human operations.

I wonder how long until there is a major incident that seriously impacts customers experience and/or business systems.
We gave it a good shot at work. It really struggled with common dynamic idioms in rails, like “find” being able to return either an array or a single value.

The combination of verbose type definitions and limited support for the kind of types rails often uses made it a poor ROI for us, but it did find some bugs.
Which seems to be the overwhelming trend in software. You get it for free but have to pay someone to be lazy about it.

Red Hat. Linkerd & Amazon EKS submissions here today. I'm sure many many more.
Another angle is that it is highly unlikely to be worth doing since we're so early in the AI cycle.

It's so challenging, capital intensive, and takes so long to bring these things online (especially if it's not your core competency), that but by the time you got something working in this paradigm, it's possible that a better paradigm/approach will have emerged.
For what it's worth, I chuckled.
No, many if not most older people prefer first-hand cars, even if they're small and look dumb (at least where I live)
I had a problem with Verizon FIOS that went on for more than half a year, where they'd charge me for a service I wasn't signed up for, then I'd call in to complain and demand a refund, then they'd refund me and apologize profusely and swear up and down that they had fixed the problem for sure and that it would definitely not happen again, then it would of course happen again the next month, rinse&repeat.

Finally I filed an FCC consumer complaint which then forces a written response from the company within 30 days. I got a call a few days later from someone at Verizon's "Executive Relations" who fixed it immediately. It was such a frustrating dance, but the real trick is that when this happens don't mess around with a hostile company. Just go directly to the regulator agency they're required to answer to.
One of my favorite laptops ever was a later gen 11" MacBook Air. Fit into the smallest bags. Flipped open and working instantly anywhere. Sturdy, always on me, fantastic for writing and even coding. I just had to get good at switching desktops and apps with hotkeys and trimming down chrome. Traded screen space for physical space. The city became my office.
I use it at Justworks and love it! Packwerk [1] is another personal favorite

[1] https://github.com/Shopify/packwerk
"TAM" Is Why I Have Trust Issues
That's why Jeff is selling his AMZN stock
> Redirection isn't a step in the pipeline

"Get data" is the pipeline step we're talking about. Using "< file" combines it with the first transformation step, instead of keeping it as its own separate step as all other such data sources require.
lol. Americans acting like they haven't covered up all the big war crimes before.

This isn't a surprise. it's the expectations. Americans kill without remorse and without adherence to international law. just like the Israelis.

Both countries are unrehabilitated scum to the rest of us, and have lost their authority in the council of nations.

Trust this Yank to think he knows best though, that his Oligarch owned industrial news outlets are less compromised than Jacobin.

Brave to be so consistently wrong. it's like watching an abortion try to reason.
Unironically, it might. Many people suffering from IBD have found relief by ingesting certain parasites (helminth is one I’m aware of). To add anecdotal evidence to the parent, I’ve found relief with my IBD by eating “simpler” foods - on top of overall health benefits.

Chesterton’s fence is not a well respected concept in the modern world (understandably so).
But who are the real culprits? Why are their heads not rolling also?
Next thing you know, they're going to tell us that he didn't really hunt vampires. You can't trust anybody anymore.
wow dayoneapp looks impressive. Thanks for mentioning it.
The same kindred spirits who were complicit in creating this garbage have now flagged this off the front page. Sad.
Same! Just got back and I really miss the cheap everything, and relatively high quality as well. Picked up some Uniqlo things that would have been 2x the price in the US.
Can someone using the same DNS server as me hijack my domains? (2015)
As a teen, I thought the "Coriolis" in "Coriolis force" was a Latin word meaning something like "rotating", I was shocked when I found out it's a person's name.
I remember Bing Chat doing that sometimes in the first days when it was rolled out. Could it be the "temperature" set too high (or interpreted incorrectly) in some instances?
I thought the Pap Test was an acronym (PAP) but it's actually named after the physician that invented it, Papanicolaou: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pap_test
The weird thing about that is that the Pontiac version (Vibe) was built in Fremont, CA on the same assembly line as the Corolla, but the Matrix was built in Ontario. So you actually got the better car if you went with the GM badge!

(And yes, that Fremont factory that built the Corolla is now the Tesla factory)
Incredible, even has a bit of "human-like" passive-aggression when I was asking dumb questions:

[Me] what kind of dental equipment do you use?
[AI] (sigh) we use a variety of reputable brands for our dental equipment, was there anything specific you'd like to know?

It almost sounded like she was rolling her eyes at that question, like I was wasting her time haha
He has always looked to me like he hasn't showered in 3 days. He just looks thinner now.
> I don't think anyone coming from a multi-repo world really understands the full implications of a monorepo until they've worked in a large scale one

That's entirely fair. My sole experience is the one black-sheep monorepo at my own relatively-recently joined company, which is nowhere even close to approaching true large scale.

Genuine question, though - what _are_ the advantages, as you see them (you didn't explicitly say as much, but I'm reading between the lines that you _can_ see some)? Every positive claim I've seen (primarily at https://monorepo.tools/, but also elsewhere) feels either flimsy, or outright false:

* "No overhead to create new projects - Use the existing CI setup" - I'm pretty confident that the amount of DX tooling work to make it super-smooth to create a new project is _dwarfed_ by the amount of work to make monorepos...work...

* "Atomic commits across projects // One version of everything" - this is...actively bad? If I make a change to my library, I also have to change every consumer of it (or, worse, synchronize with them to make their changes at the same time before I can merge)? Whereas, in a polyrepo situation, I can publish the new version of my library, and decoupled consumers can update their consumption when they want to

* "Developer mobility - Get a consistent way of building and testing applications" - it's perfectly easy to have a consistent experience across polyrepos, and or to have an inconsistent one in a monorepo. In fairness I will concede that a monorepo makes a consistent experience more _likely_, but that's a weak advantage at best. Monorepos _do_ make it significantly harder to _deliberately_ use different languages in different services, though, which is a perfectly cromulent thing to permit.
> For example, a prompt seeking images of America's founding fathers turned up women and people of colour.

I smell a sequel to Hamilton.
> and it will greatly benefit the readability also

This is the controversial part, Lisp aficionados to the contrary.
The LLM has very little memory between two tokens of the same message (there might be a little in the sampling algorithm), so it should be equally capable of noticing an error in the same message as a new one.
YouTube dominates TV streaming in US, per Nielsen's latest report
One of my favorites is that the creator of Pilates was a guy named Joe Pilates. It’s like if the inventor of yoga was named Vivek Yoga (which is not the case, to be clear.)
It lost ~33% of its value vs the US Dollar in 5 years and you claimed it lost half its value in "about a year."
May get downvoted.

The author talks about the people being very friendly.

If the author is white, that is a very different experience than if you’re a person of color.

Hollywood gives tall while people a special perception in places that don’t have white folks.

You could be super wealthy and black, and most countries would still treat you as a poor African.

The biases based on color are very real.
That is a very astute observation. There is that tough code review-like process that takes place in clubs. Most don’t even care much about the audience (well, they want people to have a good time). But do care what others comedians say. It’s why I reason LLMs have a long way to go. That is until OpenComedyWriter takes the stage. I can imagine the audience booing the LLM telling it to “create more meaningful weights by accessing better datasets”…
I think most people believe it’s some sort of acronym, like a PERT Chart.

There aren’t a lot of names that end with tt, other than the given name “Matt”
> problematic?

Unless it's a regex....
Plausible or Microsoft Clarity
I'm saying that it's possible to both be the victim and to have made a stupid choice that made you winding up as the victim more likely.

And, clearly, that it's possible for you to be unable to understand such subtleties.
Thank you! I hope that chuckle made your day better.