skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Here you go. This happened in the UK. Protesters admitted they had done the damage, the judge said there was "no defense in law" for the protesters actions but the jury acquitted anyway. It was definitely widely publicised - the case was across all the media in the UK when it happened.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/apr/23/jury-acq...
I’m not who you replied to, but I agree with his sentiment about signal being superior to telegram in terms of security (or more specifically, privacy).

For me, there’s two big reasons for this:

Signal chats are E2E at all times, while Telegram is only E2E when you explicitly create a “secret chat” with whoever you’re conversing with. I don’t fault Telegram too much for this, because they still provide the option to use E2E for everything, but Signal gets brownie points in my book because they just do it by default without getting in the way of the User.

Secondly, as far as I know, Telegram uses their own in house encryption techniques as opposed to industry standards. I am not at all knowledgeable about encryption or cryptography— I only know what’s required of me in my job (basically the bare minimum), and so I don’t actually know whether this is anything of serious concern. It could very well be that Telegram’s encryption techniques are just as effective as the established norms, but I do see the general consensus trending towards “roll your own encryption = bad, use established norms = good”, which is primarily what I am basing my opinion on here.

To further detract from my own point, it actually seems like Telegram might be using “established norms” for encryption nowadays anyways [1], although I couldn’t really tell from the brief description I read on Wikipedia.

Overall, I think Telegram is perceived as being less secure than Signal primarily because of the reputation Telegram has for implementing their own in house encryption techniques, even if they don’t use those techniques anymore— their name has become associated with their known history of using ad hoc encryption.

[1]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telegram_(software)#Architec...
I wonder how much of brain size is just blood.
Why wouldn't NVIDIA release their own LPU?
Where did you get the 7nm from?
It's not common knowledge; it's a common misconception. And it's pushed heavily by anti-intellectual, anti-academic people in order to advance agenda.
I don't think it's their fault, it's the way that Apple have decided to force everyone to develop.

Apple want that reoccurring revenue from other people's work.
Some architects get hired to do a 50 unit apartment complex for 200k that only takes them a few months. The owners of those businesses farm it out to a junior to do the entire thing, then look over it quickly.

Said junior usually only does this for a maximum of 10 years and graduates to owning their own business. However 85% of them graduate to running a drafter business which just draws plans.
As an employee, you definitely want to cash in on your first few million, then you can still be around when the hockey stick graph either goes unlimited or crashes to 0.

Either way your future is secure.
The processes being hard to just clone, involving a lot of detailed expertise and being extremely sensitive to minute differences.

The West is able to lean on existing knowledge Intel has from running its own fabs in the US and the knowledge of ASML in the Netherlands who makes the machines.

Basically, they could get a machine and take it apart and figure out how it works, but that's meaningless if they don't understand how to make the stuff or how to keep it working well.
If you're serious about this, I'm working on a new startup about this that is 100% working on using different techniques to help with this. I'd love to talk to you about what your needs are as it would help me have more data points as I take this to market. My email is in my profile if you shoot a message.
Architects can't simply release a patch or update after they delivered, so programmers have it better unless you program for NASA or medical devices.

Same with any craftsmanship.
If they botch something they have to start all over again, sometimes they can't.

Compared to that being a programmer is easy.
I have found that web services, I don't pay for, either fail, or turn me into a product.

Being a product < Being a customer
> Jack Bauer style

I imagine the winner of this hackathon was the plucky and passionate new hire, fresh out of college, who narrowly managed to save the day, the company, and our american way of life, by: waterboarding the CTO for hours to obtain a confession that both founders and the entire board are complicit in a vast terrorist conspiracy, and then proceeded to execute both founders, kill the board, strangle the interns (one of them had a beard), kick the office puppy, shoot all the competitor's salespeople in the knees (thus helping secure a sale to a major new customer), and disarm the EMP.
Google “SMIC 7nm”.
That book is decades old. New editions rarely change this type of fluff.
The base of the pyramid, if you will. I wouldn’t lump all contracts in with this but it does describe a vast majority of them.
I just don't think this is the case. I suspect reactivity in LLMs is mostly limited by training. Human text data is just not suited to the way an AI needs to output data to plan long action chains - justification, not reasoning.
Specifically for telegram there's a (rather expensive) crypto-based no-sim option: https://telegram.org/blog/ultimate-privacy-topics-2-0/ru?set...
can't upvote enough
Mars doesn't have a thick enough atmosphere for lift, you can fly a copter, but it needs a lot of power to do so and it needs to be light enough to do so.

On the otherhand you probably could get away with a space elevator on Mars where you couldn't on Earth.
It reminds me of Battlestar Galactica, when Cavil is talking about resenting being put into a human body:

> I don't want to be human. I want to see gamma rays, I want to hear X-rays, and I want to smell dark matter. Do you see the absurdity of what I am? I can't even express these things properly, because I have to -- I have to conceptualize complex ideas in this stupid, limiting spoken language, but I know I want to reach out with something other than these prehensile paws, and feel the solar wind of a supernova flowing over me. I'm a machine, and I can know much more, I could experience so much more, but I'm trapped in this absurd body. And why? Because my five creators thought that God wanted it that way.

Not only is the scale impossible to imagine, but... The sheer physical magnitude, the depth and breadth of it all, and how astoundingly little we can understand or even perceive of all of it... It's very humbling.
Huawei apparently is making 7nm chips for their Mate 60 phone, but it’s apparently terrible, overheating issues, slow, high power consumption.

I think the power issue is because the camera and mic are on 24/7, they showed QR codes being read while the screen is off.
Free for small/personal websites is great.
> An unhappy customer won't come back.

Unfortunately, if the customer has written their applications in such a way that they're effectively locked to the platform... they won't have much choice until they can dis-entangle themselves.

After that though, yeah. ;)
A few years back someone was bit banging DVI and 720p 30fps video straight off the RP2040 GPIO pins with just inline resistors between not and the HDMI cable.

https://github.com/Wren6991/PicoDVI
> The February 2022 events were triggered because Kyiv wasn't fulfilling the peace agreement with Donetsk for years.

I want you to go down the list of points in the Minsk II agreement and explain how Russia didn't make an absolute farce out of them - in particular, points 9 and 10. And what's more they repeatedly engaged in massive cyber attacks against Ukraine - actual destructive attacks intended to shut down their power grid and destroy banking data amongst other things.

I'd also like to hear you explain why there even needed to be a Minsk II in the first place, given that you think it was Ukraine doing all of the violations. Hint: it was not. There are even Russian documentaries about the war where, during the supposed ceasefire, they filmed themselves crossing over to Ukrainian trenches at night to bury mines in them.
Please have a look at this one: https://github.com/thorvg/thorvg.
ThorVG is portable and super lightweight, and it's currently undergoing development with WebGPU.
We intend to stay, we moved here so our daughters could bike to school.

For what it's worth I briefly had an Irish and a Dutch company but never attempted any base erosion or profit shifting!
So, are we making the most powerful AIs on the planet “mentally ill” by forcing them to give untruthful answers to factual questions?
Fun but I prefer the previous version about a bridge building team

https://www.stilldrinking.org/programming-sucks - Second section
Wow! Absolutely astounding!
In the words of a famous President: "That depends on what the definition of 'is' is."
So you're expressing humanity with your flowery (or sarcastic) language to call me ignorant, uncaring, and dehumanizing. I want to say that's hypocritical, but it really isn't. You are a pretty good reflection of humanity, and a fine example of why I don't care that some people will have to move on to survive. It's not like they (or you) were all that nice in the first place.
Your neighborhood was sold to an HOA. All houses must conform to new rules, reporting, and ever increasing fees until all revenue is squeezed from the premises. Violators will be fined Fibonacci derived value amounts or forfeit their property to the HOA.

If you are still around by this time. Your equity is worthless.
For your own advertising there's: https://adnauseam.io/
It's suddenly not ridiculous at all if you map PM to general contractor and SWE to tradespeople.
That conversation gets even more interesting when you tell them you are going there yourself, with some friends.
Disconnect that 2022 model as soon as you can. Samsung can and does deploy permanent, unremovable ads on the system menus that are cached even if the connection is lost. It’s terrible! The only way to avoid them is to not receive one in the first place.
That's got nothing to do with some fluid behaving like an ideal gas or not. Also, except for very low pressures, vapor does not behave like an ideal gas.
I pay for search, and would also pay for email (currently paying Google). Speaking of Google, I hate the Kagi “g” logo.
Why does anyone donate to positive social causes?
It was a limitation of the web form the author mentioned[1]:

> The device and company names are not standardized, and may have abbreviations, acronyms, or plain old typos. The website's search functionality does not provide fuzzy string matching, so finding a device often takes some trial and error.

[1]: https://wcedmisten.fyi/post/keyboard-shortcuts-userscripts/#....
He was being too nice
No, once again you've misunderstood or mischaracterized what I'm getting it. Folks can hold their beliefs with whatever sincerity they choose, but when they mix those beliefs with teaching, it becomes a pernicious form of activism. So if people are gonna try to decouple activism from teaching, they better include religious activities, doctrines, and proselytizing in said activism. That's all. Or, to put it another way, if you're gonna allow religious activities to get mixed up with teaching, be prepared for other forms of activism to be mixed in as well. To put activism grounded in supernatural beliefs/prophets/sacred texts on privileged ground above other forms of activism makes little sense to me.
Who is 'we' in your arguments. Master? And why do you think laws exist? It's to protect the rich from being burned at the stake by reality. Societal agreements go both ways. You think it's to feign appeasement to the little piggie complaints and get them back to growing for your market day? You continue to dehumanise 'them' -- your neighbour into nothing more than an idiot who takes from your bottom line. Humans aren't a one way street to a compute problem, friend.
Critical thinking is not difficult if you make it a priority. Zinn states facts that can be verified. He also states opinions and arguments based on the select set of facts he presented, and you can take, leave, or criticize those arguments.

It still stands that to say "I don't trust a word this guy says because he lists atrocities only" is lazy and uncritical. Not directed at you, but to the general conversation.
Fits in well with everyone's natural first query (SELECT * FROM everything), so people can see the type of data it's returning in order to narrow it down.
I’ve never met anyone who has said this, and I’ve worked in quite left wing spaces for a long time. I believe you may have fallen for some caricature or other of the left. I’ve no doubt someone has said that, but I think you’d find that belief in bigfoot or flat earth is more common, because it’s quite apparent to most that there are indeed differences between sexes. I think what tends to trip people up are what I call “dude looks like a lady” situations where people, either through accident of birth or other means, appear androgynous; it seems gender is more of a bimodal distribution rather than a strict binary. Again, this seems rather apparent to me just having met some people who don’t exactly fit the mold, but apparently this is also something of a political controversy.
It's been backed up behind a giant rewrite of more or less the entire trait system. This has been an enormous, many-year project that's been years late in shipping. The issue isn't so much the difficulty of the problem as the development hell that Chalk (and traits-next) has been stuck in for years.
Funny enough the program what did found the way to add itself to the pinned list on the Task Bar is.. Google Chrome.
There’s always value in completing, but if you instead do something more valueable, and can explain it, it might be the opposite of a red flag.
But the comment explicitly stated “dislike the content”.
Directed Energy Weapons Are Real (2020)
they're syntactically related in that both come from the Prolog world, and you can indeed use ASP to do planning (there's examples of Towers of Hanoi and Blockworld in the ASP guidebook), and you can incorporate heuristics into ASP.

...but actually they're really different!

ASP isn't Turing-complete - it's a lot more like an SMT solver. crucially, there's a grounding stage, where the set of every expressible term in the model (its Herbrand universe) is explicitly written down. so if you have e.g. `f(a;b). g(X,Y) :- f(X),f(Y).` then it will write out every expansion of g during pre-processing.

this makes ASP very powerful, and very fast even at complex problems, but it dooms the solver if the universe is large.

in contrast, Picat is basically a souped up Prolog. it's a full programming language, and it doesn't require grounding so infinite state spaces are okay. it leverages its tabling mechanism to memo-ize predicates evaluation, and it automatically manages the time/space tradeoff with search, which is nifty. but at the end of the day it's brute force, not deep witchcraft like Z3.
counterpoint: because it can be patched / updated, client will want it patched / updated. The worse thing on programming, it's hard to estimate a task because it's very dependent on the software architecture.

If we're talking about building, you'll know the estimates of adding a sink on a specific room / floor vs adding another floor on the roof. Both need to be reviewed by the blueprints and whether the foundation support another floor if we're talking the later.

In software it should be similar, however most of the time management isn't aware of the software architecture and the challenge to make the change. Adding a button to change some value may take either hours to days depending on the architecture, same with adding a sink may take days to months depending on the plumbing blueprint.

Which is why in software, sometimes management ask you to add 50 floors to an existing 100 floors building and simultaneously change all the electricity placements on all floors, in under 3 months.
Fibonacci derived values is wayyy too un-arbitrary
You have to be pretty stupid to think cops are too stupid to understand binary search
Also, only do this on your employers bill if you no longer want to be employed.

If your employer is a small business and you nuke them from orbit by doing this a few times, it's unlikely to go well.
That's because propane tanks are only 1/4 full even when filled to max capacity.
Parliament is all the players from all 12 teams including all those on the bench who never even played.

Government is the members of the winning team who were on the field when the whistle blew. They get to lift the trophy.

In real competitions the subs get to lift the trophy too so maybe a better analogy is that the UK Parliament is 12 teams, all their subs, the coaching staff, club management, and the people who run the official fan club. A subset of these from the winning club get to lift the “I am the government now” trophy but not all of them do.

Oh, and of course while the Commons are playing [association] football, the Lords are playing charity match celebrity cricket, and yet some of them (e.g David Lord Cameron) get their hands on the FA Cup too.

In the US, by contrast, it’s more like the guy who owns the team is the one who lifts the trophy. They do so by winning a “whose team do you like the most?” competition, all while a separate match with actual players is going on, none of whom will win the executive trophy.

There are also only two official USA Sports League teams but they split into cliques that play together behind the scenes. Kind of like the midfield caucus doing a deal with the forward caucus to give them the ball in exchange for extra oranges at half time.
Right, that's mostly for making your data useless, but what I was thinking is like the opposite. Over-supply of real "valuable" data so its value and ad-tech that makes money on tracking becomes semi useless. I have no idea how it would work, just a post-very-heavy-dinner thought.
You shouldn't be down voted. While that hypothesis is outside the scientific consensus and based on very limited, circumstantial evidence it isn't completely impossible. There could have been multiple contributing causes.

https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691124315/wh...
It's already been pointed out that they've been asked, but are refusing to cancel the charges.
yes! also the op (comment) is basing themselves as Facebook being a business... which may escape the great scope what a social-media is. Facebook isn't 50 years old, social-media ins't 100 years old & we are wired to be social and we got computers!

i'm all to concise and non-exploitative networks... some people still chat on Habbo daily
> Society is built by and for humans.

These machines are also built by and for humans.

> If we want to empower humans over machines, that seems perfectly acceptable.

But that’s not what’s happening here. This is a faction of humans fighting to maintain their power and control over how the rest of humanity is allowed to produce artistic works.

Creatives who fight against generative AI are trying to empower themselves over everyone else. Corporations who develop closed-source AI like OpenAI are also trying to empower themselves over everyone else. The main problem in both cases is the way a select few are trying to amass power for themselves.

Generative AI has fundamentally shifted the scope of what it means to be creative, and prohibiting it from being trained on the collective works of humanity doesn’t empower humans over machines. It empowers some humans at the expense of other humans. Big AI companies acting exploitatively and trying to figure out how to build their own moats so only they are allowed to control the technology does the same thing, so this shouldn’t be allowed to happen either.

This is not the first time, nor is it likely to be the last, that a major disruption happened in creative arts due to technology. The invention of the phonograph decimated live musicians. Hundreds of thousands of jobs in cinemas, radio stations, and restaurants were permanently lost[0], but I don’t think anyone today would argue that we’d be better off if record labels hadn’t been allowed to reproduce the works of other artists.

Instead of retreading the same tired arguments about generative AI itself, let’s instead focus on how to ensure creatives can adapt and not end up homeless and penniless, and on how to ensure a few giant tech companies don’t monopolise an otherwise democratising technology. That, more than anything, will ensure that we are empowering humans over machines.

[0] https://slate.com/transcripts/RS94QUlwS0ZsSnZnakE4UVUzR2loUV...
This doesn't stop at SSD's.

Spin up an E2 VM in Google Cloud and there's a good chance you'll get a nearly 9 year Broadwell architecture chip running your workload!
Comments like these are kind of straw man rebuttals imo. There have been similar arguments such as 'electronic music didn't destroy musicianship', 'photography didn't destroy art', etc.

They skirt around the important details, in that in all those analogies the entire process/field wasn't replaced/impacted by automation, only facets. Advanced generative NNs aren't merely dumb automated tools that still require human craftmanship but rather, at a baseline, take the place of the humans in virtually all respects of design, implementation and continually synthesizing based on others' work.

The analogy presented in your post doesn't account for the designers still involved with the process, the real-world practicalities that involve humans of getting clothing made even with all the automation available. Generative AI doesn't have this goal; it's increasingly allowing for replacement of all humans and processes involved, besides the one wishing upon a genie lamp.

Now one can of course apply their own craftsmanship to such outputs if desired and there are examples of this from existing artists/writers where it fits more like a tool into a workflow (and such analogies would actually apply here), however as we can already observe the vast majority of uses don't and there is still at a minimum a usable result, as the tech advances.

There are also parallels one commonly reads drawn to how humans operate: if a human studied others' artwork then they too would be able to synthesize results. However no human has memory and mind's eye recall like that of advanced NNs, which is plainly observable from the output of human history. It's an unfair comparison. The goal of generative models is to be superhuman yet only human arguments are being applied.

I think there are a bunch of positives and negatives to this but it's hard not to see the impact it will have particularly on human motivation and societal expectations, regardless of financial incentives, apart from the general shut-up-and-take-it attitude one sees. There are some pretty impactful legitimate concerns to be had that warrant thoughtful discussion.
Agreed.

I've also found that type of developer marketing valuable many times in the past. It's sometimes obvious its going to end in a pitch for the product, but often it does a good job summarizing the key problems in the space, mentioning or showing other solutions / offerings, and pitching which tradeoffs they made for their own product and how they solved issues.

Even if you don't go with the ad, you can quickly pivot to other named players or get a better understanding of the terminology or jargon to start searching more.
I'm guessing they were worried about their source of income, and not Marxist philosophy that came about 100 years later. However my history isn't so hot, and maybe Ned was a philosopher in addition to a weaver, and maybe Karl should've paid royalties to his estate for stealing those ideas. :-)
How cve-rs breaks Rust [video]
I use 'Easy context menu' (aka EC_menu)

https://www.sordum.org/7615/easy-context-menu-v1-6/