skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I'd wager good money on the latter.

Don't guess, measure! The proper action here would be to change BIOS settings from their default / "auto" settings to per-Intel-spec safe ones. Same for RAM, and on systems with known good power supplies, CPU cooling, software installs etc. Then one of the following will happen:

a) BIOS ignores user settings & problem persists.

b) BIOS applies user settings & problem goes away.

c) BIOS applies user settings but problem persists.

Cases a & b count as "faulty BIOS" (motherboard manufacturer caused). Case c counts as "faulty CPU", and replacement cpu may or may not fix that.

No need to guess. Just do the legwork on systems where problem occurs & power supply, RAM, CPU cooling & OS install can be ruled out. Sadly, no doubt there's many systems out there where that last condition doesn't hold.
Ask HN: Does procrastination advice help you?
I have read countless number of blogs, watched a lot of videos on solving this problem, tried different methods and failed. Is this a sign of depression or ADHD?
I often have to close a tab because my 12-core Mac mini starts heating the room and the fan sounds like it's about to fly off the axis. This is not specific to Javascript but the ad code doing this is obviously JS.

Speaks more to the general Enshitifcation of the web.

Does Web 3.0 fix this? /s
I'd love a modern non-SaaS MS Access equivalent, that just use files: https://stephango.com/file-over-app
Windows 11, VS Code 1.86.2

At no point have I been asked to enter license details, is that supposed to happen when it initially runs?
Nope, not even close.

My skills have declined since I started. I've gotten older and more cynical, so they'll see way less potential. They'll also be wondering what's wrong with me that I'm still a midlevel dev after a decade of experience (hint: I have a disability).

It doesn't really matter if I'd pass today. Although many of these points come up or apply to my year end evaluations (it's not pretty).
I am a Data Engineer and it would take me ages to spin up the service with the right log level to grab the query. It is much easier to grab it from the codebase. I used to do this manually from time to time, now I use ChatGPT.
Did you click on the "Report Phishing attempt" button installed by your IT center in your mail client?

Sorry for the probable sarcasm. In a company that size, if the IT center does not provide a means to report phishing attempts then there are more serious problems than a dodgy email campaign.
Some German banks created paid storage service with multiple plans available. They are required to deliver documents to their customers but managements have massive brainfuck about the requirement and the most absurd solutions and ideas are being sold to them.
As long as I don't have to buy a new computer every year to run the latest Google, I don't care. If my browser or other essential application keeps growing in ram requirements without ground breaking improvements, I grumble.

> I also choose IntelliJ over Vim.

Now do the same with your tram or parking ticket app.
The idea here is to do things in a sustainable way for the local population. What you're describing is the exact opposite.
It’s rational because you see these gamification schemes as distractions that trick you into bending over to pick up pennies off the ground while the banks pick your pockets. The credit card system is ludicrous. The payments system is a natural monopoly, so it should be operated as a public utility (e.g. FedNow I guess) with much lower fees for all. No more points, but lower prices and simplicity for all (especially for merchants).
>Apple, as a company, can disallow installation of any 3rd party apps on their platform tomorrow

No, they can't. False advertising, etc. Installing apps is one of the expected/marketed features of an iPhone at purchase time. Apple could be sued into the ground for doing something like that.

It's like saying that an auto manufacturer can advertise their car going 0-60 in 3 seconds, so you buy it, then afterwards they release an OTA update that drops the cars performance to 0-60 in 5 seconds. It's not allowed at all, and if a company does it they owe the consumer.

But because you want to give Apple special treatment, I suppose the logic follows that you would think that this case: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_Cor.... was unjust to Microsoft, since it's their platform, they can do whatever the fuck they want, right?
> Just take the OpenAI / Microsoft deal as an example. If a $10B investment into a company comes with strings attached, say with board seats and an exclusivity deal to use Azure products, they just blocked out any other hosting service that could compete. If that is legally questionable but they can invest most of the capital as credits for Azure products, they've effectively done the same thing without it clearly being coercion.

Microsoft invested in OpenAI and OpenAI has become a huge success. That's all to it. They offered them a deal with azure credits, profits etc. and OpenAI succeeded. They could have failed and doubt anybody would be concerned about MSFT's deal with OpenAI...It is not like Microsoft forced OpenAI's hand there - they could have gone to Amazon.

> For a new OS, Microsoft this spent decades building an ecosystem and marketshare in the enterprise space. MS could pretty easily make sure none of their services work on the new OS. They wouldn't be fully blocking the new OS out but it would make it an extremely difficult challenge.

They could but they won't due to their high market share and public outrage. That's the whole point. If Microsoft tried to ask for 30% from any Windows app installation then would be in a huge legal trouble immediately. Hell, even bundling Windows Media Player led to some fines...I can have any store on Windows and I don't need to pay Microsoft a thing but if MSFT will try to use Windows API to make Steam work worse than Windows Store, that would cause legal trouble for them.

> My understanding is that part of the OpenAI investment was in Azure credits. That may technically be legal, but it blocks any competition in the space and defers paying taxes on the value of those credits.

But here is the thing - OpenAI went to Microsoft and agreed to that deal. They could have gone to AWS or GCP.
> Live and die by network effects.

If I have my facts straight, they have gone from 2M to 5M users since they opened to the public just 17 days ago.

And btw, using Neil Gaiman as an example, he is prolific on Bluesky. He has 861 posts on Mastodon, vs 4.5k on Bsky. He seems to have already made the move to a large extent.

https://bsky.app/profile/neilhimself.neilgaiman.com

https://mastodon.social/@neilhimself
The CD contains PDF with scanned terms and conditions?
Seems like with this kind of speed, the only reason this is not a video tool is the lack of consistency controls?
I am a Data Engineer. I can spin up the service locally, but it would probably take me half a day to install the right versions etc and change the log level. The code is there, ChatGPT does a good enough job at it, or at least did. It is super easy to verify it did a decent job at it.
That isn't the topic. Porn is an example, but safety is synonymous with puritanical requirements arbitrarily summed up as the lowest common denominator. I want a powerful AI, not a replacement of a priest.

Gemini demonstrated a product I do not want to use and I am aware about the requirements of corporate contexts, although I think the safety mechanisms should be in the hand of users.

Google optimized for advertisers, but I am not interested in such content as it provides little value.
NGINXConfig: Easiest way to configure a performant, secure, stable Nginx server
I'm not a lawyer, my Google searches don't constitute legal advice.
At least this was an intentional change, not something that just broke down out of sudden.
That’s not a camera, it’s a Demographic Sensor™.
Do you know of any published data evaluating the efficacy of these detectors? Because I've never seen any, so I'm curious how you know the false positive/false negative rates.
I wanted to, but I could not find it. It turn out I could not see the "report phishing" button because of an Outlook glitch. Thanks Microsoft.
YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Information
Except when CarPlay(can’t speak to Android) doesn't work as intended, requiring you to still pick up your phone after you tried to accomplish something on CarPlay.

I’m on the road about 3,000 miles/mo and CarPlay not functioning properly happens so often that I don’t even really notice anymore how often I have to pick up my phone.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CEL...
I don't think your analysis of countries flocking to BRICs is a good one though. While Russia and China do want to see the dominance of the US go down and potentially see BRICs as a tool for that, the other members have their own agendas that make it far less potent. India, for example, is in it for good relations with their neighbours, but benefits from and wants more trade with the US.

> seemingly inadvertently promote US prosperity and influence, many times at their expense.

Joining in with the US rules based order is what has allowed China to become massively more prosperous. What they don't like is that the system is not their own, now that they've got into a more powerful position on the back of it. Further to that, they've always tried to dodge the 'rules' around IP and so forth. Now many might say fair game, the US did the same in it's youth. But in those times the world order was colonialism run by the Europeans. I would invite the view that if China had played more strictly by the 'rules' and supported the system they've joined, then they wouldn't be seeing aggressive push back from western nations and could potentially have lifted more of their population to a higher level.

I wonder how far a multipolar world could go anyway. The thing about being able to participate in western markets is that it seems to not be a zero sum game. We all grow economically. Not that there aren't huge downsides and bad things, but economically there's been general benefit. Eastern European countries demonstrate clearly that's the system they want to be in, I don't think a system that Russia is happy with is going to be lifting anyone else.
For the record you can do the same with various emacs python modes, and it is vastly superior to using the python repl alone.
I have received SMS mostly a day after I ordered something of Amazon. I'm not often ordering something, so sometimes I go weeks without scam SMS.
DHL, FedEx, and UPS are experts in overcharging to process a form and not caring about customers. Duty and VAT are usually low compared to this processing fee, and shipping has already been paid. Here is the catch in the EU, this simple duty form can be processed by the receiver, an agent (some related to the carrier), or an attorney-in-fact of the receiver. The big three carriers (and many others) threaten you if you refuse to use them.

At the end of the day, they don't care if we get phished or scammed; it is all of customs confusion. Next time process your customs form, you will realise how much money you will save, and the form only has less than 8 fields, the Union Customs Code is easy to read.
This is really interesting. Thanks for sharing!

Unfortunately the consoles don't allow installation of such a USB over IP client so I can't use this, but for other usecases where the clients are running general purpose OS, this could be great!
Consolidation on narrow themes is ensured by our reliance on query->answer search engines.

If you think about the shape of the web at the time Google introduced PageRank, It was a huge graph of content connected by fine-grained related interests. It got that way by people doing the work of drawing those relations; and it's a lot of work, given that the number of potential relations is essentially proportional to the square of all existing content. All of the interesting information is in the edges of that graph.

Who's doing that work now? PageRank incentivized people to trade links for the purpose of ranking higher on Google. People became reliant on the convenience of Google to find anything to the point that if you don't rank on Google, you don't exist. People who created content for the sake of the content, and interacting for the sake of interaction, stopped doing it because why waste time yelling into the void? People who felt like they were providing for the community by hosting these sites had no reason to continue. Without people creating, exploring, interacting, and relating content based on pure interests, there's nobody doing the hard work to organize the web in a way that makes it traversable.

We're entirely reliant on platforms showing us the content they want us to see, and what they want above all else is for users to be predictable. If your interests and behaviors are too nuanced for the algorithms to get a handle on, you can't be categorized, packaged, and sold to advertisers with some expected conversion rate.

At this point in time, most of the people who spend time on the internet have never even experienced anything different, and those who have barely remember. If your business relies on their attention, what good is a website going to do you? Your income relies on appealing to social media algorithms, not gaining the trust of the people who used to shape the web.
Don't most orgs already own Google Workspace, or MS365? I fail to see how MS Forms + Excel, or Google Forms + Sheets can't accomplish this (with the addition of common spreadsheet features). It's not to be snarky, but it feels like an easy comparison to make.
You are not in control of what you see in your feed, it's the algorithm that chooses for you. So while technically all kinds of content can exist, most users will only see what's officially approved.
Well, yes. But also no. If you need/want a feature that is only included in the non-F/OSS release, then you are not just paying for the support.
Raspberry Pi 5 still has a USB 2.0 OTG port. So the bottleneck is USB in that case
NTT Data to develop AI that can detect driver's cognitive decline
At the undergrad level essays aren't supposed to be incredibly original. It would be pretty hard for them to be, given the volume of students answering the exact same essay questions.
Dang changed the username to "nothttparchive"

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39451976
It's usually enough to just use names "Maria Smith" will almost always look like "Maria Smith" in good SD models.
This is for a performance issue and the Laravel code base is straightforward to map to SQL. It is to get a rough idea of the joins and the filters to see if there is potentially an index missing.

This is low hanging fruit. ChatGPT can do this, and also easy to verify it got it right.
Just looking through the current results, the only other one that really jumps out at me is "-server" to get rid of the server GPUs that can't be used for gaming.
It will depend on the jurisdiction. It will be fun when a model is trained in Japan on material that would be copyrighted in the USA, then produces an image that is not able to be copyrighted in the USA.

> Japan's government recently reaffirmed that it will not enforce copyrights on data used in AI training.

https://cacm.acm.org/news/273479-japan-goes-all-in-copyright...
Yes: in the same way a boat and a car are similar since they both "take you from A to B".

Now, do you really don't see how a Java/GO style GC and reference counting are different?

It's not like I didn't enumerate some characteristics that make all the difference - and that explain why people do not think of those two cases as just a single thing called "garbage collection", and also why people believe that ARC would have less overhead than a Java/GO style garbage collector.
Can confirm that the dashboard of an electric airplane made last year has waxed nylon lacing tape and those knots because I did it.
'Chinese dragon-like' ancient reptile identified
IMO, number of commits is irrelevant since you can always squash them. LoC is the relevant metric.
What is the speed with CPU+16GB ram without GPU?
do you just run it from https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder ?
I got one of the faulty 13900k, at least in my case I can confirm that the fault appeared using the default settings for pl1/pl2.

I was doing reinforcement learning on that system and it was always crashing, I spent quite a bit of time trying to find the problem, swapped the CPU for a 13700kf I was using in another PC, the problem was solved.

So I contact Intel to start the RMA process, Intel said that the MSI motherboard I was using doesn't support Linux, I emailed them the official Intel GitHub repo with the microcode that enables the support, they switched agents at that point but I was clear to me at that moment that Intel was trying their best to avoid the RMA, luckily I live in Europe, so I contacted my local consumer protection agency and did the RMA through them, in the meanwhile I saw a good offer for a 7950x + motherboard in an online retailer, bought it and sold in the second market my old motherboard and the RMA 13900k when I got it.

Not buying Intel ever again, I was using Intel because they sponsor some projects in DS but damn.
I would assume that _any_ software, formally verified or not, could fail due to a hardware problem. A cosmic ray could flip a bit in a CPU register. The chances of that happening, and that effecting anything in any meaningful way is probably astronomically low. We probably have thousands of hardware failures every day and don't notice them. This is why I think rust in a kernel is probably a bad idea if it doesn't change from the default 'panic on error'.
You guessed it, it's NAS -(Ethernet)-> SBC -(USB)-> PS5. This is partially because they are on different floors and partially because the NAS server doesn't have any OTG ports.

> Also how does content play on the PS5?

As far as the PS5 is concerned, it just has a USB hard drive plugged into it. It doesn't know how it works under the hood.
> who were lying liars.

As opposed to truthful liars?
The old documentaries where Shane Smith himself went down to all kinds of dangerous places were really sick.
I would assume that software can always fail in the event of a bug in the hardware. That's why systems that are really redundant, for instance flight control computers, have several computers that have to form a consensus of sorts.
I think the answer here is "don't do things that are borderline (un)reasonable"
A child now will be totally unaware about that because he will be occupied doomscrolling whatever trends is current now on TikTok.
US man accused of making $1.8M from listening in on wife's remote work calls
Obviously just call the totally normal support number shown 1 800 111 112 /s
Our IT did the exact same thing with expiring m365 passwords. They weren’t using the corp domain, typos all over and the URL was obscured using a bizarre link shortener.

The same guys also force us to change our passwords every 6 months and block the last twenty. Passwords we have to enter in systems that can’t pull directly from password managers and thus have to type 10-20 per day. Guess the average strength of an employee password!

I think IT incompetence should lead to audit fails or even better delisting from exchanges.
A little US company makes history by landing on the Moon
Graphite is neat. If you want something lighter-weight, spr[1] is also worth taking a look at as an entirely client-side "solution" to PR stacking.

Unfortunately, it is very hard to build good code review tooling on top of GitHub due to the severe impedance mismatch between the two models as well as GitHub API limitations and rate limits. That mismatch cannot be fully resolved (branches vs. patches) and results in constant friction, and you end up trusting a third party with full control over your repositories and approval workflows.

Graphite is the best attempt I've seen so far, but it still doesn't come anywhere close to Gerrit[2], which simply uses plain Git commits. Every commit becomes a review, and stacking is accomplished by simply pushing multiple commits. No custom tooling required - just `git push`.

It has very, very good code review UX and allows meaningful and in-depth back-and-forth during a code review, without losing context or having to re-review the entire diff. Once you're past the initial learning curve, it is blissful.

Gerrit is open source and it's what Google uses for many of their public projects such as Chromium and Android, and it is quite easy to self-host. It is entirely built on JGit and even stores code reviews as Git commits alongside the repositories.

If you want to give it a try - there's a well-maintained public instance, Gerrithub[3], operated by Gerritforge. Many open source projects use it.

[1]: https://github.com/ejoffe/spr

[2]: https://www.gerritcodereview.com/

[3]: https://gerrithub.io
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A...
automatic rebasing is nice but how does graphite/ et al. solve the issue of creating a rebase conflict when working in feedback in the middle of the stack? And big prs have usually the property that you cannot just incrementally merge parts to main without breaking main. An api producer might change at one place and the accompanied change for an api consumer changes in another. Splitting up prs so the parts can be merged is significant work and part of the reason why big prs happen in the first place. I dont see how this works without a "virtual" main branch target that only gets merged to real main when the whole merge is done but then you have to reconcile differences for things that happened on main in between.
Some people care (too much) about design details. Still a market though.
I almost got in some trouble because of that. A "bank" I wasn't a customer of kept sending me messages about "urgent, answer this form with your personal details or we will lock your account". Seemed quite scammy to me.

Then I later got a physical letter in the mail about the same, and then I called the bank. Apparently I had some account there holding some pension stuff from a previous employer. Shrugs.
They wanted to find Leicester Square in London

- Hey can you tell me where "lie-sester" square is?

- Oh you mean "lester" square, yeah walk up that...

- No I'm pretty sure it's "lie-sester"

- Ok well I've never heard of that square, good luck!
These scammers probably aren't targetting specific individuals. They blast these messages out to a bunch of randos, and odds are very high that at least some of those are expecting packages just by chance. The marginal cost of an added message is tiny compared to the reward of one successful scam.
I believe the opposite.

I think the ability for people to adopt models made SD more successful than any other model for image synthesis in the first place.

Similarly how consumer PCs drove innovation towards faster hardware.

I believe it to be the reference of image synthesis for that matter, so "better" is a bit blurry.
I do not read this court decision like that at all: the point of contention there seems to be that the customer was just sent a link to a webpage (where the contractual terms can be changed from under him at will by the company, thus this not being durable). The court makes it pretty clear in my (non-lawyer) opinion that attaching a PDF to the email would have been fine.
It is a crime [1]. You don't have to hurt someone's career prospects on the basis of skin color to apply affirmative action.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Shepard_and_James_By...