skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
actually they and others are disturbingly familiar with the usage of this malware, and employed its features to enter these compomised routers and disable the malware
I guess it is easy to avoid the election cycles when you constantly put opponents in jail, or kill them. Why didn't we think of that?

And for all the time Putin has to lay out his master plan..what did it buy him? A river of Russian blood in Ukraine?
Navalny didn't just "die." He was murdered by Putin.
LingoBook and LingoYak: The Best Way to Learn Languages Fast
If a shelf was millions of dollars you can bet my local library wouldn't have any more than they needed. Because a shelf is cheap my library can afford to have extra.

Also selves in my library are redundant in ways road lanes are not. If you move a book across the library that isn't a big deal, but if they move the book to a different city that would be a problem. Likewise, even if there was an extra road lane someplace, if it isn't close and going in the right direction it is not redundant.
I use this to get a list of my configured aliases.

[alias]
ls-alias = config --global --includes --get-regexp 'alias\..*'
Sure, but it's not a guarantee either way.

You probably had the same chance with a cheap contractor.

The website looks a bit more professional and trustworthy. That could have been achieved by someone skilled for much cheaper.
Wars aren't decided by pure manpower/materiel, or the US would have won the Vietnam war. It's all about win conditions.

For instance, if Russia loses e.g. 20% of their population then the economy will utterly tank, and if the economy tanks then Putin will lose support for the war and risk falling out of a window.

Ukraine doesn't actually need to win here, they just need to stall the war out for longer than Russia is willing to stay. Russia doesn't need to wipe out Ukraine, they just need to kill Western support of Ukraine and dry up the flow of military aid.

So if Ukraine just needs to stall then why did they go on a counterattack? Because it brings in more military aid now while Russia still has a materiel shortage. If Ukraine has a harsh materiel advantage over Russia then they can push Russian casualty rates far harder and force Putin into political strife much sooner.

Putin crippled the Russian economy by refusing to sell gas to the EU and by extension hurt Russian materiel production, but the tactic makes sense when you consider his win conditions: break Ukraine's western support, so that Russia has a materiel advantage.

>"Russia will soon attack us" rhetoric

I think that's actually Russian propaganda - Russia wants the West afraid to give Ukraine aid, so they play up the nuclear threat every time new milestones in aid are suggested (e.g. when the first F35 is given to Ukraine), then fold the moment the milestone is reached. Russia does this because slowing western aid to Ukraine is vital for their theory of victory.
Pruning Dead Exception Handlers
You probably mean "to prevent military tension"? When tension already becomes war, it's sort of pointless to continue economic integration in the hope that it can stop war.
EU?
1. Not all file formats are well specified
2. Not all files are precisely following the specification
3. Not all file formats are mutually exclusive

Those facts are clearly reflected in the table.
Sure you can but Apple has at least a prayer and a hope of catching those apps in App review to protect users.

And if they don't, they have at least a chance of circling back and catching them later.

They want that.

With apps that they cannot review such as PWA apps, they have no such ability.
I see the "major questions doctrine" the opposite way. I see it as a power grab by the judiciary to deign to decide that some things are too important to trust to the text Congress wrote into the laws they passed. The Court is telling Congress "you weren't specific enough when you wrote this law and the agency is taking advantage of your ambiguity, and we won't allow it". Instead, the Court should say, "what this agency is doing is plausibly within the bounds of this legal text due to its ambiguity".

If Congress would like to clarify, they are free to do so. The Court should not be saying "we believe this is too important of an issue for ambiguity to allow this action", they should only ever say "we believe this action is unambiguously in violation of this law".

(And FWIW, what I described is pretty much just what Chevron deference already is.)
I get not believing the cry wolf. But not when the wolves are literally tearing people up in front of you.
Doesn't help, the whole history of the US (and USSR) using regional proxy conflicts to advance their purposes, and then discarding their "allies".
Military do it when in the field to keep the reflections down. Women do it with watches that have bands designed to look like bracelets, they get the practicality of a watch while still appearing to just be wearing a bracelet.
Cool, I didn't know about this book! I enjoyed Think Python, but this book surprises me. I'd think there are very few people learning Perl / Raku as their first language nowadays, so a book targeting more experienced programmers seems like it would make a lot more sense.
Most of Europe?
That's not criticism of syncing possible states with expected ones.

e.g. Not having a disabled={condition} on some input field isn't going to change the fact that the client wasn't built to handle that state. Either the client was written to expect it or it was not.

All you're saying is just expect the states that make sense which is (A) a trivial claim and (B) something you have to do even if you don't make unexpected states impossible.
If it was not clear for the reader of this comment: European Union is the example that has ended centuries old tensions between European powers.
Let me correct some of your misunderstandings.

The comment you were replying to, correctly, pointed out that there is no benefit to the user to side with Apple's anti-user stance. This story, and comments about the story are having to do with a users right to install a browser of their choice, choose a payment method of their choice, etc - which is collectively under the DMA that the EU passed into law - democratically. Apple has repeatedly tried their best to spin this, but it is easy to see past the spin.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Markets_Act
If I recall correctly, the common phenomenon where you open a Word document, immediately close it, and are asked whether you want to save your changes (???) has something to do with printer settings.
I found that `main` was actually easier to type and say than `master`. You should keep doing what you're doing of course. But now that the change is becoming popular, I'm happy to keep using it, even in the absence of any particular moral reasoning.
Why does the DJ need to be there, in such a case?
I don't see AWS fast-following the 1.5 million companies that use AWS, not even the 0.1% most successful of them.
> Because I hated living in Apartments when I lived in them.

I meant more along the lines: why do you expect that to be the future, such that you have reason to fear it?

> The problem with this is that we haven't actually solved resource scarcity, and until we do there is still going to be an upper limit to what you will be allowed to buy

Yes, but the AI necessary to make human labour redundant is that tech. In the absence of that tech, humans could still get jobs doing whatever the stuff is that AI can't do.
TIL. Didn’t know trief
I think their BC is overrated. Wine manages to do a better job.
There are other programs that in combination do cover basic needs for those that qualify by need. You're not going to be able to replacement CHIP and Medicaid with UBI. At least not without extensive bureaucracy on the tax side.
> “80% of people use this, probably take a look”

If an option is used by 80% of users, shouldn't it be the default, and have an option to turn it off for the 20%?
"I think that the post is actually a move in the opposite direction, away from the unitary executive."

That's incorrect. The argument in the brief is the unitary executive argument.
> Surely a corporation with lots of resources knows better than to program a chatbot to make fake offers; they'd get sued.

They didn't program it to do that, it's a characteristic of the technology that it makes mistakes. Which is fine as the public learns not to blindly trust its answers. It seems silly to assume that people won't be able to figure that out. People are capable of learning how new things work.

This is like the people who set the cruise control in their car when it first came out and then climbed into the back of the car to take a nap. That's not how it works and the technology isn't in a state where anybody knows how to do better.
Isnt the US depending on china for production just as much as Europe is depending on Russia for gas.
A big example of this that comes to mind to me (as a space nerd) is the ISS and various American rockets developed around that time. The US footed much of the bill for the ISS and offered Russia a ridiculously good deal in offering to launch their modules and setting up the seat exchange with Soyuz. Boeing and Lockheed Martin adopted Russian rocket engines for their rockets despite the national security concerns of having major launchers dependent on a potential adversary. This second decision caused a good bit of harm to domestic rocket engine design in the US.

Of course part of the goal was to give Russian rocket scientists a more peaceful task to work on than spreading out to Iran, North Korea etc, but it was also a great chance for Russia to integrate further with the West and expand their historical prominence in space technology.

Instead, they've done everything to ensure that they never get such a deal again, and have allowed their space industry to atrophy significantly.

There's talk about how if Russia had been allowed into NATO they'd have been able to channel their energy into more constructive pursuits, but they were given an opportunity to do that for space technology and did not do so.
If you compile them to DVI you'll get the same DVI file.

Compiled to PDF you might get very slight differences.
Considering he was thrown in the can for 30 years and his associates had left the country, I fail to see how the opposition dies with his death, rather than having died with his incarceration.
Apple typically makes good decisions, but they don't always do that or act in your best interest. And that's the problem with supporting all their decisions without checking if they're good or not for you.

In this case, iOS isn't capable of handling different rending engines well. So instead of asking them to improve iOS so this isn't a problem (like it isn't on Android and even other iOS apps), you side with their decision of breaking/removing a feature, even though it doesn't benefit you in any way.

I'm sure you can see the problem with this.
UK and USA: Physics Publishers Say They'll Put 'Purpose Before Profit'
How is this any different than rendering PDF in browser? PDF is not a Web standard. Browsers choose to ship internal plugin to handle PDF.
I agree that it is the users right to install a browser of their choice, use a payment method of their choice. The recent EU law, which was passed in a democratic system, supports this right.

You're free to make up your own mind.

BTW, My morals, despite my personal failings, are superior to Apple's on this particular issue. Its an interlinked economy with interlinked dependencies on various entities that you may or may not agree with. That doesn't mean you're not allowed to protest them. Otherwise nobody can protest climate change if they drive a car - which is ridiculous.
The metal cables that held up the tower have been laying on the ground for long enough that plants have grown over them then died in the winter.

Three foot tall plants have grown in front of the door of the equipment cabin that would have been trampled down if anyone removed the radio equipment recently. The cabin looks like it has been derelict for years.

The electricity meter is missing and the place where it should been looks like it has years of corrosion.

It is a muddy field with no signs of recent footprints or gouges that would indicate the tower was removed recently.

Anyone looking at the state of the site would think that the medium-wave AM station has been off the air for years.

The radio station had an FCC license that required they operate an AM transmitter. Now that the FCC has found out that they are not broadcasting on AM , the station is not allowed to continue on FM.
And a tourist visa is hard to get even with a residence permit. The consuls (rightly) see you as an immigration hazard. After all, you've already moved countries one time, who's to say you won't repeat the trick?

Meanwhile in Moscow, you have a good chance to get a 5-year visa from France.

Fun fact: the exact same phenomenon was being ridiculed by the White Russians, back in the 1920s. European countries were suspecting them of being Bolshevik, yet the actual Bolsheviks could come just fine.

Now, of course tourist visas are not really relevant for emigration, but it's an example of the attitude shown towards us.
Network television is enormously expensive and entirely paid by ads without knowledge of the viewers. Instead they make assumptions based on surveys of demographics and manage to be very profitable.

I wonder if you could make a comparison of ratings of a TV show to active users of a website. For example: is Twitter the equivalent of daytime TV, or multiple series-finale-of-Friends per day.

*edit: it looks like they are the equivalent of 0.8 Friends finale / day. 41m daily active users vs 51m viewers of the Friends finale.
I'd inject nicotine pouches like Zyn in there, since they've also come up as a new moral panic:

nothing > oral/mucousa nicotine > inhaled nicotine > oral/mucousa tobacco > inhaled tobacco
Nice to see JIT improvements.
that's an interesting twist to the concept of feature flags, since this is user driven, I can see myself trying it out.
how hard is it to integrate into an existing saas app and are there any requirements for my saas app to be able to use it?
I would bet someone out there has attempted to come up with a high-margin tongue depressor with fancy built-in features. But the plain wooden stick is already entrenched and obviously effective (for depressing tongues).

This is the opposite. If the state of the art was a fancy tongue manipulation machine that cost $30k, used licensed consumables billed at $100/patient, and did a bunch of non-essential things that doctors found convenient once in a while, would someone selling a box of sticks get anywhere?
"Good Stories" by Ken Liu. Relevant, Given the Sora Announcement
While it's true people are losing trust, it's because companies, or more realistically, the people running those companies, are no longer trustworthy. I don't want news "claims," I want investigative reporting that presents multiple facets of an argument, conclusions are ok, so I can understand, integrate, and draw my own conclusions.
That's putting the cart before the horse; countries only join the EU after they're already politically aligned with the current membership. Turkey, for instance, has been kept out of the European Union precisely because of these types of concerns; a strategy of economic integration would have entailed allowing Turkey to join the EU in hopes that the EU would be a positive influence on the country.

Edit: I'm being throttled so I'll respond to similar comments here. TheOtherHobbes similarly notes:

> The EU. France and Germany used to be deadly enemies. No one sane is expecting a war between them any time soon.

In particular, France and Germany weren't peacefully reconciled through economic integration. There was a war, and the victors of that war installed democratic governments in both France and West Germany and inducted both countries into a broader alliance.

> Same with US states. Texas etc keep muttering about secession, but the economic complications make it an insane idea.

It took about two decades after Texas was admitted to the union for the states to fight a civil war against each other.

genman says:

> Remember WW1? WW2?

Not personally (I'm not that old) but those were not instances of economic integration easing military tensions; they were instances of extremely bloody world wars. And the First World War in particular was already deemed impossible because of the degree to which European economies were already economically integrated. That theory did not pan out.

wolverine876:

> The EU (in its early forms) was formed by the countries that just fought each other in WWI and WWII, and for centuries before that. The EU was specifically intended to prevent another war.

Again reversing cause and effect. The Allies won the Second World War and installed friendly governments across western Europe (and also in Greece); following this, those friendly governments formed the EU.
In January 2020, EAGLE 9.5.2 was discontinued as a standalone product and is only licensed to users as a bundled component with an Autodesk Fusion 360 subscription.

In 2023, Autodesk announced that they will no longer sell nor support EAGLE after 7 June 2026.

from https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/EAGLE_(program)
The only part that's not going to be available for a while is fractional scaling in GTK and old Qt5 software needs to update to Qt6. Everything else is rather quickly falling in place. GNOME in its stereotypical fashion doesn't seem to want to support fractional scaling and doesn't want to provide QoL features like not making XWayland apps blurry, but that's not a problem with Wayland per se.
Both can be true. Google pays as much for zero days, and Google prioritizes security and privacy less than Apple does.

Google's very means of income relies on gathering and to an extent sharing your personal data.
It depends what you mean by CRUD app.

Strictly speaking, the answer to your question is Airtable.
> And therefore people should be able to assume that the answers are correct.

Why is that a necessary requirement? Something can be useful without it being perfect.
Yep.

And, of course, let's not discuss:

- tourism + air travel

- increasingly large cars far bigger than required from a utilitarian perspective

- luxury good production

- theme parks/fireworks displays

- cruise ships

Etc.

Bitcoin/crypto opposition is 95% pushed by embedded financial interests that will use any lever to protect their control over money and the power it gives them.
Whenever I use a new application I look up the frequently used menu options and the corresponding keyboard shortcuts, if any. It’s a lot faster than using the mouse for most actions.

Nowadays most applications are developed with the mouse as the primary or sole interface (look at some Electron based or similar apps), treating the keyboard as just an input mechanism for characters and numbers, and not supporting it as a navigation or control mechanism. I don’t see many recent developers trying to learn and use keyboard shortcuts either. They suffer through slow and imprecise mouse navigation and clicks.

Keyboard interfaces are faster for those who use it, but the OS and applications have to provide first class support. While I like macOS way more than Windows, don’t ever try giving up on the mouse or trackpad on a Mac. It’ll be mostly unusable and will waste a lot of your time in trying to get things done with just a keyboard. In Apple’s own apps, you just cannot do what you want to with the keyboard alone (Reminders has been a great example for many years — trying to navigate using tab or arrow keys would show how utterly broken it is).
But it didn't have lisp :)
For deep stations they don't work as well - you end up with a lot of switch backs.
Not necessarily I'd say, it could be something that's confusing to a newcomer or (or even doesn't make sense) on first use. But that doesn't exist anyway, that was a wish for it to exist. If the tool had it, it could decide to change the defaults as you say, and so the worth-looking-at number would just be 35% or whatever instead.
A small control sample is not “few controls”. Misleading term. “Negative controls” is not a thing either. Just the control group is fine.

The error bars are not really needed. Your eyeballs are doing just fine. Yes, they overlap. Yes, it would likely have a high false negative rate.

A false negative rate is not a problem for a cheap test. This test is not meant to replace higher quality and more invasive tests. A high precision, low recall test still has significant value. You merely have to accept that a negative result tells you very little.

If we imagined for instance, that the false positive rate is very low despite the overwhelmingly larger population of people without cancer, then this would be of enormous value.
> I’m under the impression that it takes a lot for someone higher up like this to announce readiness for war.

A lot ? Like a beer ?
They will change their mind tommorrow.
I saw this in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39386156, discussing the Sora announcement. I think the story is very, very relevant and wanted to share it.
> If someone wants to borrow huge sums from a bank the bank should take the risk and price it appropriately.

Yes, but the point is that they can use your credit score to make more fine-grained assessment of risk.

Should an auto insurance company offer the same rate to a 97 year old blind driver with a history of accidents as they would to a 30 year old in good health with no tickets? What about the 16 year old who just passed his driving test yesterday?
Clearly these three people present vastly different levels of risk to the insurance company and, even though it is certainly possible for the insurance company to do so, it would be stupid to ask them to pay the same rate.

The bank is simply doing the same thing: Pricing risk appropriately. The fact that they offer significantly different interest rates to different groups (or decline to offer credit entirely) just shows that these signals are effective at measuring risk.

> How is the world better because Schufa knows someone bought a prepaid phone card and can sell that to an online store when you buy a pair of shoes and choose to pay by invoice the next week?

Well, the shoe store is extending you credit, so it would seem appropriate for them to want to, as you put it, price the risk appropriately. The fact that you have recently undertaken other credit obligations is suggestive (yes, not conclusive, but still suggestive) that you may be in a precarious place financially and thus statistically more likely not to pay your credit on time.
ah! thank you for pointing this out. will fix
I particularly enjoyed this passage from an older edition of Think Java: https://files.catbox.moe/v1vgdc.jpg

Also neat:

> What happened next is the cool part. Jeff Elkner, a high school teacher in Virginia, adopted my book [Think Java] and translated it into Python. He sent me a copy of his translation, and I had the unusual experience of learning Python by reading my own book.
> Corporations are not people and don’t have constitutional rights.

... aren't the rights of corporations in part derived from the rights of individuals? Suppose Alice and Bob each have small businesses, but Alice is a sole proprietorship, and Bob incorporates. Without warning, or any kind of warrant or legal proceeding, the police come in and confiscate all of the merchandise from both businesses. Should the 4th amendment only protect Alice?
Can you please stop posting so promotionally on HN? If you read https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html, you'll see it's against the site guidelines.
> Per Apple’s guidelines, Epic Games can’t operate an app marketplace that exclusively offers its own content. Apple says that marketplaces must be fair to all developers, so Epic Games will have to accept submissions from other developers as well.

Cute
I notice that even the blurry scaling on Windows looks better than what we have on Linux. It seems that they have some special algorithm for that. Anyone who knows how it is implemented can chime in here?