skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I split my todo list into three files: today, this week, and later (backlog). Every Sunday, I move dated task reminders (and copy some recurring weekly reminders) from my later file to my “this week” file. Every day I move reminders from my “this week” file to my today file. Ideally my today file would be empty at the end of every day, but in reality I always have tasks that roll over to next day… or week.

This system helps me focus on my most immediate work and still have peace of mind that my system won’t lose the reminders in my later file.

I store my todo files in Dropbox so I can access them from multiple devices (including my phone) and get automated backup for free.
50 Americans have died in Ukraine since the Russian invasion
They do what you were talking about, not what I was.

They seem annoying. "The IPU has a unique memory architecture consisting of large amounts of In-Processor-Memory™ within the IPU made up of SRAM (organised as a set of smaller independent distributed memory units) and a set of attached DRAM chips which can transfer to the In-Processor-Memory via explicit copies within the software. The memory contained in the external DRAM chips is referred to as Streaming Memory™."

There's a ™ every few words. Those seem like pretty generic terms. That's their technical documentation.

The architecture is reminiscent of some ideas from circa-2000 which didn't pan out. It reminds me of Tilera (the guy who ran it was the Donald Trump of computer architectures; company was acquihired by EZchip for a fraction of the investment which was put into it, which went to Mellanox, and then to NVidia).
Although the attention is really good at focusing on specific information, I've had problems with this approach. It seems like if I ask a task and provide a large enough API it gets distracted or ignores the chunk of text and does its own thing anyway.

Also it's still more expensive to increase the context length
Regarding ad margins:

If kagi saturates the market of people that can afford to spend $50/year for a decent search engine, then Google ads will only reach people that cannot. This would greatly reduce the value of their ad inventory (far more than the percent market share they’d lose).
Yes, i agree, this is one of the most interesting aspects of content-addressable networks like IPFS.
> Zed, however, is not open source

This was true when the article was written, but it is no longer true.

https://zed.dev/blog/zed-is-now-open-source
subtractive graffiti
The last major war between peer great powers was in the 1940s. It wasn't fast or easy, but it was in part propelled by theories that new technology (aircraft, tanks, submachine guns) allowed new tactics that could allow wars to be won cheaply. This is in addition to the reality that the whole thing was arguably inevitable after the botched peace of WW1, which was also in part propelled by new technology (railroads, monstrously big artillery, machine guns) and hopes of a short war.
Any online resources you used to get yourself on the right track or as a starting point to get running?
If you don't mind using other limbs, there's a whole ton of products aimed at musicians who have their hands full but still want to be able to manipulate another device. For example, the organ, guitar pedals, and much, much more. Big variety of pedal setups generally, but musicians have been dealing with the "no hands" input problem for a very long time.

There are also a number of existing eye tracking input systems, but I think that kinda sucks / is limiting.

I'm aware of tongue-activated joysticks for people that are unable to move their bodies. Maybe look into assistive devices of that variety.

https://youtu.be/MtvpXr9O0J4?si=S8tJJm08_J5bzWMb
I don’t see the parallels at all. Reddit was floundering and struggling to find revenue and funding. OpenAI is thriving and people are desperate to invest in it (hence this offering at an incredible valuation).

Liquidity for startup employees is a good thing, not a conspiracy maneuver.
Clearly the author has never used Emacs, because they have confused Emacs "modes" (which are more like features that get turned on and off) with modal editing (like vim).

There are also plenty of markdown preview packages available for both Vim and Emacs (even live preview). Emacs has had preview-latex since before Atom even existed.
Nvidia has a monopoly on Cuda. If they decided to sell cards for x10 what they are now no one will have a choice but to pay up for the next year.
Isn't stock also a scam since they don't have to issue dividends?
You mean EA, not e/acc?
Capital One to buy Discover Financial in $35B stock deal
Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori.
Omg! Same story for me! I was working in a billing company and we used an iframe that we'd reload with JS that would run to change the DOM. Around the same time as well!
The GCloud and the Razer Edge are both significantly more expensive than the PS Portal if I recall correctly though.
The Abxylute does seem similar in price, although I'm guessing the PS Portal likely has better controls (being essentially a Dualsense split in half) and maybe a better screen.

Also yeah, Steam Link would work too but Moonlight/Sunshine generally seems to work better.
Also, as a vim user, modes are completely fine and I do not believe that modes slow me down. I’m not sure why the author is so insistent on this point.
Are the readings not repeatable enough to derive a simple, secure key from the pattern? (I'm realtime of course - not suggesting caching it long term on the chip).
I get where you're coming from and definitely vet books in similar ways depending on the subject, but I also feel like this process is pretty limited in ways too and appeals to some sort of objective third party that just doesn't exist. If you really want to know or have an opinion on a work/theory/book at the end of the day you have to engage with it yourself on some level.

In graduate school for example, it was pretty painfully obvious that most people didn't actually read a book and come to their own conclusions, but rather read summaries from people they already agreed with and worked backwards from there, especially on more theoretical matters.

I feel like on the long term this just leads to a person superficially knowing a lot about a wide variety of topics, but never truly going deep and gaining real understanding on any of them- it's less "knowing" and more the feeling of knowing.

Again, not saying this in an accusatory way because I totally do engage in this behavior too, I think everyone does to some degree, but I just feel the older I get, the less valuable this sort of information is. It's great for broad context and certain situations I suppose, but in a lot of areas I consider myself an expert, I would probably strongly disagree with summaries given on subjects and they also tend to miss finer details or qualifying points that are addressed with proper context.
> There was very little monetization

The problem isn’t even necessarily monetization but the hypermonitization that took over the web almost immediately.

We never had much of a mom & pop era, we accelerated immediately from volunteer enthusiasts into megacorporations.

Part of this, ironically, is people getting used to the Internet being free. Paying for content, even small amounts, was blasphemous. But something has to keep the lights on and the proles paid and two decades later, that something was advertising and venture capital. It was a devils bargain.

Now everyone is chasing clicks and VC money and AI is the new accelerator for both.
Long ago I got a Psion Series 5. One feature was that it could dial a phone number (output the DTMF) for you. Messing around I've day I realized a contact could have a very long phone number. This was also back in the day when answering machines existed and many had a 2 digit code you could punch in to get into the menu from the outside line.

My contact called Answering Machine had a very long phone number that got me into more than one answering machine. Once in, it was fun to change their outgoing message. One friend was convinced that I must have climbed the back of his apartment building to get in the open 3rd story window to change the message. That would have been cool, but a string of DTMF was much easier!
Thank you so much for sharing this!

I’m curious if you have ever looked into the Tap Strap 2? I recently got one and it looks promising with preliminary testing but I haven’t invested much time learning and configuring it yet.
If you could actually control the virtualization in the browser, that would be good. Unfortunately you are just left trusting that it is even virtualized (properly).
Summary: https://www.videogist.co/videos/jeff-dean-google-exciting-tr...
It's even worse than that. L > H > A, but that's for the data center cards. If you want the latest Ada Lovelace core in a workstation card, that's an RTX 4000 Ada Edition series (and it does not use the old Quadro naming). This is different from a Quadro RTX 4000 - that's two generations behind, a Turing. An RTX A4000 is one generation back, an Ampere. Oh, and gaming cards which may give you better performance for less are mashed into the same numbering scheme. An RTX 4070 is a gaming card, and it exist in vanilla, Super, Ti, and Ti Super flavors. And what makes a card "gaming" vs "workstation"? The first have a gaudier-looking heatsink and less memory. Makes sense, right?
Isn't there a lot of value between possible and good in terms of productivity or appeal when picking any tools though? There are plenty of tools I do use that are open source and free, but for a fair price and suitable value proposition, I'm going to pick something that I'll get the investment return from regardless of whether it's open source or not
Very impressive spreadsheet, I appreciate the link.
>I don't understand these policies

Easy- it's because electric cars as a class of product aren't there yet (every company with significant EV production capacity is busy producing late-alpha-quality products except for Teslas that are early-beta). Therefore, consumers need an incentive to buy and manufacturers need an incentive to create cars that are worse in most ways in the hopes that they'll be able to fund the development of technology that would actually make EVs viable for the average consumer.

As far as the politics go, the wing of the government that believes electric cars are the future spent all its money on a public health measure (the success and necessity of that is out of scope), and relevantly for France industrial inputs got more expensive because the US finally got the war on the European border they'd been trying to ignite for the past 10 years.

Environmental policies are ultimately luxuries; and in a new era of austerity after 3 years of unrestrained spending it's not a surprise that subsidies are disappearing.
They are not leading their competition in terms of technology; they are ahead in a public theater and as the first to market. The claims of "regulate us," "it's almost AGI and it's dangerous," and "let's put a moratorium on larger models" are all just hype, deceiving the public. They utilize the work of scientists and other companies worldwide without acknowledging their contributions. Certainly, they have done an impressive job, and the scientists and engineers working there deserve respect and recognition. However, they are not significantly ahead of current research. They are not even weeks ahead of research. The current landscape is a game of budgets, winning public opinion, and securing investments.
I read the text first, then listened to the audio, and was shocked at how good that transcription is.
The only reason they didn't want the decels to do their shtick is because that would mean, indeed, loosing heaps of potential money.
But you can believe in the fable about the most exciting technology yada yada yada
They'll learn the meaning of "World Of Hurt"
Say more about isoheaping and how it helps? Is this related to arena allocation? A quick search doesn't find anything on this. Thanks.
I dont think compute capacity will be the determining factor for moat. It will most likely be access to various types of data and I believe on that front Meta and google are way ahwad
Are we looking at the same subreddit? Perhaps it's changed since I last looked, but most recommended lights use a replaceable, rechargeable cylindrical lithium battery. A common requirement/desirable feature of lights is good light output controls (such as ramp firmwares), waterproofness, etc. There's plenty of recognition that different lights are not ideal for everyone, and if anything the brightest lights are seen as too much for some (given they can literally burn holes in your pocket..)

I can't say every post is legit, and I'm sure there's a fair share of marketing posts posing as real users, but there's good reason IMO to recommend the lights they do. There's a lot of stuff that comes out of China that's just as good if not better than the American brand for half the price, if not even less.

That being said, it's an enthusiast subreddit, as all such things are, so if you're looking for a "casual" recommendation it's likely to be more than you need XD
Google and Kagi give the same top hit for “cheapest esp32 c3” for me ($2.50, ali express).

If I add a ? to the end of the query, Kagi additionally suggests an $11 reference board and a redit forum on the topic.
Pretty confident that with posts like these, no marketer wants to come to HN and ruin our experience.

These eclectic sounds are for a certain types of individuals and there is no quantifiable commercial value for search engine juice.

Thank you for the audio.
The answer you can have the same source code and compile with gcc, but only cake is implementing the checks at this moment.
The have the same source code compiling in any compiler a header ownership.h is used to define owner etc as empty macro.
This strategy is used on cake source itself, that is checked with cake, but compiled with gcc msvc and clang.
> You need to securely get the code and resources to the browser. A state level attacker can make this very hard.

Even worse, you need to securely get code to the browser without trusting yourself. The E2EE model assumes that you (the service provider/app maker) will turn evil at some future point.

Code distribution is hard enough if you can trust yourself. Its basically impossible if the threat you are protecting against is your future self.
"DM" is the store name? Do they have a website?

I was thinking you might have been meaning Denmark or something, as it wasn't clear. :)

Didn't down vote you though.
Also known as unbalanced concentration of wealth, which is what tech has been enabling at a faster and faster pace for the last 25 years.
Same here but it's a spreadsheet

Previously standalone (libre) now google sheet
I really like this idea because it has a sassy, unusual, creative and
useful logical structure.

As we know, a weakness in all free-entry point systems (like email) is
freeloading. The somewhat broken "solution" is charging a small fixed
fee to the initiator. But this doesn't work in systems we would like
to keep at zero cost because it's a blanket response to an acute
problem - most coms are welcome and legitimate.

Giving the callee the power to charge the caller a small "handling
charge" if they don't like being bothered makes a lot of sense.

Of course it has its own modes of abuse, but the best way to avoid
that is not to send to people you don't know.
These subsidy cliffs are kind of crazy if you want richer people to buy EVs. Better to only offer the subsidy on cheaper EVs.
> there was no point in time that formally verified software was mainstream. Even attempts at that have turned out broken later on (e.g. KRACK attack on wpa2)

In what ways was wpa2 an attempt at formally verified software? The KRACK attack exploited an issue in the standard itself. Were notable implementations of it formally verified? Was the spec itself verified in some flawed ways? I read the Wikipedia page and couldn't find anything relevant.
in .net core there's no setting, you target the x32 abi by choosing a runtime or target platform ending in "32" or "x86"
"uninitialized memory" and "null checks" is part of flow analysis.
UB and out of bound is not part of it.
Julian Assange's Final Appeal
Game over for investigative journalists? Or did that train leave a long time already?
Why is Prettier rock solid?
Enjoying creating! And please share your feedback.
> AB5 or not; 1099 or not; they're doing me a service and I'm OK with tipping them for doing that service well.

So you suggest we start tipping commercial pilots, dentists (and other healthcare professionals) and your city council workers, like say street cleaners and garbage pickup folks? Where does it end?

The money you’re paying them for said service should already be enough - it’s not a charity or friendship like some people in sibling thread are claiming (yikes) - it’s a business transaction
This doesn’t help for a lot of things, including some of the examples described in the article. For example trying to segregate file descriptors (or similar resource handles) to an isolated heap would be mostly worthless because a UAF through a “stale reference” would let you mess with a completely different file. In general the problem of figuring out which objects are safe to confuse with each other is very difficult. There are a handful of “obvious” types (collections, ports, etc.) that it’s clear cannot be allocated together because they hold capabilities but doing this in general is not tractable.
Information has always been paid for, whether it's news, books or magazines. If you expect for something to be free just because it's found on a search engine, I don't know where you got that from. I think my examples for music and movies that I've given in this thread are worth considering.

It's like if a friend of yours takes you to a nice Mexican place. Why would you expect to get a burrito al Pastor to eat for free, just because you eat for free when you visit relatives? Nobody said it would be free.
After patch Tuesday.
Random forest would like a word.
> That's the ideal but browsers don't support that today.

Which is why people say E2EE is unsuitable to the browser.

Sure there exists other threats and other security issues in the browser, many of which can be addressed by various means, but that is a different thing than E2EE.
You just described Manifest v3 Chrome extensions hosted on the Chrome Web Store. No remotely loaded code, frozen assets, third party review.
I definitely need to move out of Florida before having kids.
For JS for example https://github.com/MikeMcl/decimal.js

The trick is 90% just realizing these types of libraries exist so if and when you run into these requirements you’re not reinventing the wheel on some of these issues.
4. You need to not trust the cert authorities installed in a system.
Do you have the idea that non-profit means that everyone is a volunteer? Non-profit just means "no profit" not "no pay"
It helps understand who benefits from unvaccinated kids. Most public schools require vaccinations, the unvaccinated pay for private (mostly religious) schools.

However, this outbreak in Florida seems to be in a public school, maybe vaccinations are not required in Florida?
Not FlexTrade, they are a trading systems ISV, not a private market broker
> I know several world class programmers, and interestingly, the commonality among them is that they all seem to use Vim as their code editor. Many people I know who think of themselves as world class programmers use Emacs.

haha, shots fired!
20x is roughly the revenue multiple between nvidia and open ai and they are businesses with similar margins.
I think your comparison with women's right to vote is spot-on. But in most parts of the world there has been and still is progress.

But thinking about it, the US moving backward on this subject, too - a lot of people now believe it's OK to take control over someone else's body. And there are women who actually are against reproductive rights for women.

All of this feels so strange to me. Since the IBM PC the industry got a huge boost due to the PC being an open platform. Back then outside of IBM it was pretty much unimageable that anyone would say "don't open up that platform, we prefer a walled garden". But now, 40 years later, the lessons appear to be forgotten.

Maybe those who have this belief that a locked down computer platform is a good idea are young, and due to there not being computer history lessons in schools simply have not experienced those decades themselves?

I am not sure how much those groups / beliefs really overlap, but I have the feeling that those who want an almighty Apple might be the same people who want a "lean" government. Which means that they have more trust in a corporation where they don't have any say compared to a government that they can (more or less these days) elect themselves.

That again might be due to potentially missing history lessons. Maybe people simply don't know what Microsoft back then tried on dirty tricks to destroy the open source movement, and now is trying again trying to force you to use Edge, just as Apple wants to force you to use Safari. Again I would expect that people in this forum agree that it will be beneficial for humanity that there are multiple browser engines available. I mean - I guess nobody here would find it attractive to only have two different car manufacturers, who also exercise full control over what you can do with the car that you OWN.

Just to give another example: Pretty much everyone watches porn. Do they find it attractive that Apple is deciding on what on is OK and what is not? I know that people in the US are much more prudish and inhibited compared to most EU countries. But EU magazines got banned from the app store due to showing women's breasts in a medical context etc. Again I don't understand why people even trust a corporation to know better about their sexuality then themselves.

Humans are weird, and only to be enjoyed in small dosages. But I expected that people who prefer free markets, choice and empowerment of the users to be the fast majority on this forum. But that clearly is not the case.

Weird.
My brain went straight to "Residue Processing" too.
The world hasn't had a major war between great peer powers since WWII. Everyone who was old enough to remember that war is now dead, or very close to it. There's a few surviving veterans, I think, but they're almost dead of old age, and they were just teenagers during the war.

So, in short, humanity has collectively forgotten the horrors of such a war.

Also, similar to WWII, we have a large country full of people who think they're somehow entitled to conquering all their neighbors, establishing a new empire, and being a great world power under their dear leader, but this time they have nuclear weapons.
Another IP Calculator, but More
I authored a new IP information tool for network and security professionals and have published it: https://iptool.io

My goal was to teach myself JavaScript by creating an IP calculator. There was some interest in the tool from colleagues and requests for features to deal with current business problems.

The project has evolved significantly over the last 8 weeks, and I think it should be a free tool as a contribution to the industry. It has none of the annoyances of other free web sites:

• No cookies
• No tracking of activity
• No selling of information to 3rd parties
• No login required

I would love any feedback you have to improve the tool.
They are the prime example of selling shovels in a gold rush.
This could easily end up like the PC revolution though. ChatGPT being the mainframe of AI, and when the hardware catches up and performance is “good enough” we’re all running our own models all over the place.
Dustidentity.com has been around for a while and is something similar -- but there is no “tag” - it’s invisible. Diamond nanoparticles!
Apache NuttX RTOS on FPGA