skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I finally gave up trying to use the mini hacks to make RTSP work reliably. I ended up using Wyze Bridge [0] instead, and it has been far more stable. Using Frigate for the web UI. It doesn't make for a local-only solution, but I don't use my cameras to record anything that would bother me if other people saw it.

As time and motivation permit, I've been converting the cameras I care about over to POE. But having to run cable across the house for each one means I haven't done them all.

[0] https://github.com/mrlt8/docker-wyze-bridge
Poe has a bunch of them, including Groq as well!
"...and the resources necessary to capture that opportunity are not evenly distributed." If the resources to capture opportunity are not available, do those opportunities actually exist?!
No, ALL machine learning architectures are convolutions https://grlearning.github.io/papers/11.pdf
I mean you have to have a certain mindset while looking at it. I bet it’s not beautiful to many people.
"Vladmir did quite a bit to change the course of Russian history"... for worse.

e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Terror
I find it amusing comments like this only come from fresh burner accounts.
<3

I want a US-homologation Citroën DS-21 (LHD). Currently, I drive a 1985 VW Vanagon GL Westfalia Deluxe (pop-top camper). NLA vehicles are fun.
I’m sure Elon is pissed since he has Grok.

Someone now needs to make a Groc
> I believe this is a clue to where the GP post is coming from: we can't, therefore the study must be flawed.

How so? They are clearly saying they expected this to be possible already, until this article claimed otherwise (by suggesting AI is contributing something new here).

They are saying that this result will not resolve the disputes, because it doesn't address the core thing in dispute: that there are meaningful differences that people actually care about. For example, maybe it is possible to tell the sex based on the shape of the brain. This doesn't mean that men and woman think differently, which is what people are actually arguing about. And the AI in this study can't proof that, because it doesn't give us any further insights into how cognition works.

This point strikes me as actually pretty mundane and obviously correct. The fact that 5 people immediately seem to have misunderstood it (as in, they are not responding to the argument) seems to tell us something about their priors instead.
This is more like publishing hashes of a file you download. You can use it to verify the identity of an object, but that's it.

This differs from DRM in a fundamental way, namely that you are not required to do this. You can choose to ignore it if it turns out the object isn't authentic. Whereas DRM relies on making you enforce certain rules, and putting technological or legal barriers in your way to prevent you from breaking them.
I Walked Across Spain
Oh, excuse me, Box::new :D. At least in rust it’s an explicit method call instead of implicit.
i would've been impressed by this 2 years ago. i think it's got to the point where real, valuable ai is in the hands of the everyday consumer, so we start judging the models for ourselves. having seen google continually get crushed over the past year, a bunch of benchmarks just fail to impress. in particular in this case, they're comparing their latest model to gpt4, which hasn't changed that much in almost a year.
I actually wasn't so much talking from that perspective, as simply from the perspective of the design of individual pieces. There were rather clever things done in e.g. older multipliers or adders or similar which, I think, could apply to most modern parallel architectures, be that GPGPU, SP, MPE, FPGA, or whatever, in order to significantly increase density at a cost of slightly reduced serial performance.

For machine learning, that's a good tradeoff.

Indeed, with some of the simpler architectures, I think computation could be moved into the memory itself, as long dreamed of.

(Simply sticking 32,000 SA-110 processors on a die would be very, very limited by interconnect; there's a good reason for the types of architectures we're seeing not being that)
> Sex is a fluid social construct.

To give you an example of what sex means: The level of testosterone in my body may be influenced by society, but if you measure it, you will have no doubt telling my sex. Like for most adults, it sets me apart by an order of magnitude from the other sex. And I make this prediction without ever having measured. Any biologist would validate it just from looking at me.

It is very likely that my level of testosterone will never be in the range of the other sex. Since puberty, until death. Society cannot change that. The diurnal cycle? You jest.
If it works well isn't it not similar to phrenology?
There's a huge difference between summarizing a stable document that was part of the training data or the prompt, and knowing ephemeral facts like restaurant hours.
Building Zilliz Cloud from scratch in 18 months
In the US Discover is accepted in 99% of places: https://www.discover.com/credit-cards/card-smarts/discover-c...

So your worry is overblown unless you travel internationally frequently.
I think it will help your device to know whether you are using authentic HP cartridges or Nespresso capsules.
I could smell this sound
I'm no more suggesting that you actually attempt to build an ANN to run a full quantum simulation of a person and their house than Einstein was suggesting that you go out and board a train that goes the speed of light. The reason it's called a thought experiment instead of a project proposal is that actually doing the thing isn't the point. It's about examining the consequences of a premise.
Nice. If this can be reasonably retrofitted to existing libraries and projects so that the safety properties compose from local to global, then this could actually be a meaningful improvement to the safety of real-world C code.

There would be many more steps required "toward" memory safety, such as eliminating all forms of UB including uninitialized memory, out of bounds pointers, data races, etc. but if this direction is to be pursued it has to start somewhere.
terahertz waves, which are smaller and travel much faster than radio waves.

Well raise my rent.
If you go remember to thoroughly clean your kayak and other gear so that you aren't transporting invasive aquatic species to the area. Even though it is usually a desert, you can introduce something that will be hard to detect until the next big rain and hard to remediate.

Scrub it with soap inside and out. Go have fun.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wet-bulb_temperature

You're getting slowly poached out there.
Now that's got me wondering if you could replicate that through the haptic feedback component of e.g. MacBook trackpads.

I assume you could in theory? While in reality, there's probably no way for user software to access that part of the hardware directly?
The "click of death". Sends an icy chill down the spine of any old
timers who owned an Iomega Zip.
Yes, I have the debilitating fear that I am going to be automated out. I already believe I have failed in life and stopped trying. Now I am en route to being automated out even before my career begins.

If you wonder what the reason is, despite starting CS in 2014, I haven't had a full-time job once. My skills are so diverse that I don't qualify for anything but happen to know a few of most things. So what value do I contribute? Nothing.

Hence, what OP writes is something I relate to. If I make it, it would be a shittier version of what is already out there because I do not have the energy/skills to make something novel. And all those rejection emails have proven that I am worthless. So there is nothing in this world that gives me hope.

OP, if you are feeling like me, the only hope I have is something stupid like faith. No idea why but I have started to trust religion because of the peace of mind it brings. This faith thing, at least helps me bring back on track and allows me to do even when I know, to the point, this all matters to nothing.
Sure, but this is their primary logo:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dodge_black_logo.svg
This (feature or attention maps) is BS. A real explanation would show what factors were being used to make the determination. Claiming the model is "looking at" something has no explanatory power. We already knew it was looking at the picture. These heat maps are great for showing people what they want to see and making wishy washy claims like this but they really don't explain anything in the commonly understood sense of telling us what is different.
Provenance != DRM.

The ability to prove the origin of something over "Source: dude trust me bro" is critical to a great number of people.

But sure, let's stick with "yeah nah, this piece of paper says what's in the box is in the box so it must be legit" because FOSS is gonna get salty about this.
I'm partial to the secondary graffiti that accumulates over time when half-hearted attempts to cover up graffiti with leftover paints seem to create a whole new mural of its own.

https://www.designboom.com/art/brian-kosoff-graffiti-abstrac...
It is a compiler setting.

`-Dint=__INT64_TYPE__`
Good choice for non visual users maybe
What prevents somebody from scanning it and reconstructing the position of the metal pieces?

Perhaps a better solution is to create a small chip powered by electric induction. The chip would have an embedded private key and solve challenge-response queries issued by the scanning device.

I'm not sure how that compares in cost though.

Edit: it looks like these already exist and cost less than 10 cents a piece. They are called NFC tags.
> Often, security experts argue that the web isn’t suited for E2EE applications because of the vast attack surface for code injection – abusable by the developer or by an external attacker. For many web applications, a web browser receives and runs code from a zillion servers, retrieved over a zillion TLS connections.

This feels like the wrong argument. I don't think this has anything to do with suitability of end to end encryption. It is easily worked around with e.g. subresource integrity, or rolling your own signing scheme.

The real problem with end to end security on the web is you don't have a trusted base. You have to bootstrap your application with some sort of trusted base. On a website you are redownloading the website everytime.

The entire point of end to end encryption is that the service provider should not be able to intercept messages. The service provider is the attacker. This is impossible to prevent if you redownload the app everytime you open the page†. You have to build trust from some starting point. If you have some trusted bootstrap code you can build from there with signatures, but you can't build trust out of thin air running code directly supplied by the party you are trying to protect against.

The problem isn't the zillion TLS servers. The problem is the first TLS server, which in the e2ee threat model we have to assume is evil.

† i guess service workers can extend that to once every 24 hours. Still not super compelling.
I literally gasped after reading the synopsis. It is such an incredible idea, that seems strangely (and probably wildly incorrectly) simple.
That's like saying Linux is C. True, but missing the point.
> say they had experienced sexism in the workplace

This doesn't necessarily mean there actually was any, just that they think there was. Maybe they got treated the same as anyone gets treated in the workplace: badly.
Not one single person forgot what triggered it. Most people who aren't bots or shills just disagree that this is at all an appropriate response.

Killing civilians in retaliation is not war and no amount of rabbinic rhetoric makes it right. Find a diplomatic solution.

It's almost like Israel [leadership] wants another generation of people to hate the Jews.

But what do I know of persecution; I'm just a gypsy. Everybody loves when my people come around.
Royal Road Progression
Ok, this is the best example I can give - you clearly are along the path and have fallen well into the rabbit hole so I'm going to skip a lot of stuff. That story is the entire reality of our lives post enlightenment, it is very significant to understand this - enlightenment is a realization, not a state of being - there is a state we can attain of true clarity and supreme perception that is often referred to as nirvana but it's just a state of supreme focus, it also passes. It's like this.

If this reality was World of Warcraft and you born a dwarf running around whatever that world is called - that would be your life, everything aside the game would matter most, etc. That is your reality. Now along comes another player, they inform you that WoW is just a game and your not really a dwarf, your a person sitting at a computer (or VR or however you need to get it) the Player explains the true nature of your reality and it explains lots of things that you've noticed and feels right.

Then he leaves. Then you are still in WoW, still a Dwarf, still just playing the game. But you know the true nature of things, so you see everything different now, far more correct than you did - you still have no idea of what a person is, so you can't possibly know the actual true nature of things but you know the truth of your reality.

This is why is in the Gospel of Thomas Jesus says, "Those who learn the truth will be troubled" Enlightenment doesn't necessarily even make things easier if you don't truly embrace reality for what it is.
Rust's Unsafe Pointer Types Need an Overhaul
No. It's not. However, as pointed out elsewhere, you can trade on many types of non-public information. Indeed, hedge funds engage in all sorts of surveillance in order to get non-public material information to trade on which gives them a proprietary edge.

You just can't trade on insider information.

That's a very complex legal line.
Maybe they mean FM waves by "radio" ? (which would then imply, "FM waves" versus "terahertz waves")

But I agree it sounds funny. A bit like, "we found faster than electromagnetic waves: we are using light"
what a crock of shit! no. none of this money will be spent wisely. these companies are requiring the government to subsidize their profits without having to spend their own money. the promise of jobs is all fluff. billions to buffalo didnt send even one billion to buffalo and certainly didnt improve any lives in that region. as someone who lives here, I wish I could trust these people but the reality is that the state is so corrupt and US government is on the same level, where all the money will be forced out of the people and nothing will be delivered.
Were my needs fulfilled?

It's really quite an easy analysis - one I don't trust others to handle for me.

Because, no, the current, say, medical system is not sufficient to have provided me with adequate specialists.

The current barber licensing situation, not sufficient to have provided with me all good barbers.

and yes, I have had, and known, shitty, dangerous cab/Uber drivers.

I've never said they were trivial. Please don't project.

No, quite the opposite! It's so important, the only judge that matters is the person receiving the care.
Of course they are full of it, Anything-"GPT" hasn't been out long enough for ANY company to make a claim at serious gains, including OpenAI themselves.
I subscribe to Kagi, and it’s great.
in a lot of these systems I interact with they're limited by packet rate more than packet size. I'm not disputing latency sensitivity in the application, I'm surprised that frame size in the normal range has measured to introduce the kinds of problems you're describing. The cost of per-packet parsing and reassembly is typically a higher proportion than would lead to a need to strictly pin to 1500 byte ethernet frames.

now if you have one system trying to send really oversized frames constantly, creating lots of fragmentation, and you have limited sized buffers, I could see a situation where the fragments are too regularly eating up buffer space, but that's even a slightly different problem too. I would expect inexpensive hardware to be able to handle 9k packets without introducing queue delay.

I heard upcoming networks are heading over 10gbps, which means their packet processing capabilities are necessarily well over 1Mpps, more than sufficient for latency concerns in the kinds of control systems hanging off of this.

Looking up some basic (possibly inaccurate) specs for the kinds of lidar used, frame samples won't fit in a packet, so we're talking in the range of 500 packets at 1500 bytes, or less than 100 packets at 9k, at around 30hz per sensor?

Clearly the deployed system works, we're dealing with 1500 bytes in a lot of places where it being the standard introduces a lot of inefficiency/hard optimization work, so it's hardly abnormal. As I said originally, I'm curious about what the factors are, they seem surprising.
Great point, the distinction between what is and isn't social media is absolutely quite grey. There are definitely people who would be better than me at defining it in a legal way, but my general take would be start asking questions like:

* Is there algorithmically driven engagement / content discovery?

* What is the size of the community?

* Is there anonymous interaction?

Chat threads in general are, I believe, acceptable, as they chiefly involve small groups of people who know each other. Digg / Reddit / 4Chan / Twitter / Instagram would all be banned, as they facilitate interaction between large groups of people who don't know each other.
I think it depends on your use case. If you want serverless — well, yes! You want it to scale down to zero and scale up to infinity really fast. Cloudflare Workers are really good at that.

On the other hand, if you want lowest possible latency, and the ability to run normal Linux applications (rather than being confined to the Cloudflare Worker limits, e.g. maximum worker size is 10MB), something like Fly.io is pretty nice: it's even lower latency than Cloudflare assuming you keep the machines running, and scaling up/down is relatively quick although not something you'd generally be doing every few seconds.
Problem? No.

It’s a feature.
> Yes - I thought they already did?

Just checked, Google still indexes Facebook and puts relevant results on top. If you're not logged in you can't continue.
… or does it https://grlearning.github.io/papers/11.pdf
Sorry If I wasn't clear. But I think the question is pretty clearly stated in the post you responded to.

The question is: Does Kagi needs to grow to be sustainable, and if so, how much.

>If Kagi doesn't grow, I fully expect the owner to eventually shut it down and move on to more fruitful ventures.

If you had a business that made you a $1 million per year profit, would you shut it down just because it wasnt growing?

Companies need to make a profit or they go out of business. However, most businesses don't need to continually increase users/ revenue to stay afloat. The coffee shop down my street is 100 years old, and didn't need to double in size every year.

I agree that nobody is owed anything. I also think that Kagi is "owed" or "deserves" tells us nothing about how many users they need to keep staff paid and the lights on.
What is your workflow for this, if you don't mind me asking?
Also keep in mind that the 5000 series is likely to have new power connectors
Wow, that's a pretty strong opinion. You do see that you are on a website on the internet right now, having conversations and discussions with strangers who could be from anywhere in the world, about technology and stuff that never would have happened before the internet.
I've seen Python that was almost as bad as PHP. At one company, a guy actually complained that he didn't want to use multiple files, third-party packages, or anything outside of the stdlib. He'd write everything inside of a single "main.py" that ran as an AWS Lambda, which he often edited live in the console. When I first saw this, I thought I had landed on another planet.

At another job, another guy built some massive abstract-factory-factory-layer in Python, a class hierarchy 4 or 5 layers deep. 5000+ lines in a single file. It was almost impossible to debug.

Both of these are better than some C++ code I once saw. 10,000+ lines in a single file. In that file, there was a function with a 3000+ line case statement, which was mostly copy-pasta'd from other parts of the code (not in that 10K line file.)

I have seen plenty of PHP code that smelled like a nuclear dumpster fire, but you can write trash in any language.
I returned the Steam Deck when I received it - it was larger than expected and just didn't feel ergonomic. The Portal on the other hand almost feels like holding the DualSense. It's a nice, though limited, device.
Transformers, MLPs.
That might not be true since there is no need for Sony code < their means of control > if you can replace it with AOSP & the Android remote play client...
Well, if politicians turn into judges and judges turn into politicians, and so many politicians are bought & paid for, is it so much different to be as blatant as possible as opposed to discreetly compensated persuasion?

That's really putting your money where your mouth is.
I think there’s room for better bookmarks, but they have to be a part of the browser proper… third party apps and even browser extensions can never be integrated to the required extent, but none of the big browser makers have iterated in this space at all.
> How the hell these incidents happen?

Because race to the bottom.

People want incredibly cheap products that are internet connected. Your average home user should not have to worry (and won't) about cybersecurity concerns, so this will continue to happen. The only out I can foresee is government regulation stepping in to make these incidents actually hurt for the companies, but America has basically no appetite for that.
Agreed -- given the talk is titled "Exciting trends in Machine Learning" it feels pretty incomplete to gloss over ChatGPT blowing up.

OpenAI bet big on (1) emergent behaviors as you scale language models and (2) RLHF / fine-tuning to follow instructions.

Both those topics were lightly covered but very much from the "Google did this" perspective (word2vec, step-by-step reasoning).
I use Kagi for finding things and LLM for asking questions. Two different use cases. I want them stay separate but I am probably in the minority.
There have been studies that have shown that a persons preference for things over interactions were affected by testosterone levels from a young age (1 or 2) to teenage years. That would also affect the brain development etc..

That being the case, unless you changed it at a young age I'm not sure that this could be changed later on in life.
Hi, I’m the creator or gitinterview.dev which I primarily built to be able to run code review as an interview (async or sync).
It kinda does if https://www.typescriptlang.org/play#example/discriminate-typ... is what you're referring to but it appears to be missing one of the major benefits: an error/warning if you haven't handled all variants.

Edit: lots of replies showing how TypeScript can be made to do exhaustiveness checking. It's neat and all but it's a lot of gymnastics compared to languages that just have this built in, which again is part of the appeal of Gleam for me.
This is awesome. I remember back in 2006 I bought every copy of MechAssault that my local Game Stop had and hoped that one was the correct revision such that it was compatible with the Krayzie Ndure softmod exploit, and used it to install Xbox Media Center (XBMC). It's from that setup that I learned how computer networking works. I credit basically my entire career with reading about softmods at the back of a Popular Science magazine.

Anyway, it's awesome that you'll eventually be able to softmod an Xbox without a specific game once the mods are integrated with this exploit. Good work!
Or an ST3000DM001.
Discover is riskier internationally but in the US it’s really not uncommon - like Amex you might not want it to be your only option but that backup Visa won’t get much use.