skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In my experience self-hosted GitLabs are rarely publicly-accessible in the first place; they're usually behind some sort of VPN.

As for an attacker being able to iterate through users, if that information is supposed to be private, and yet an attacker is getting anything other than a 404, then that's a problem in and of itself and my energy would be better spent fixing that.
Google seems to have learned from that demo this time and made very plain and upfront demos.
From Washington though.
When people ask me about The Rise of Skywalker I tell them it was fucking awesome. It had:

- mecha-zombie palpatine

- a daft-punk sniper lady

- a crazy sith-goth-senate

- lightsaber fight on some craggy rocks in the water

- a big bad spaceship (I think)

All you need to really appreciate the genius of the film is to day-drink 2/3 a bottle of single malt then nurse a double of black label during the movie to keep the buzz going.
You've got my wording reversed.

I said: recessions cause rate-drops. Which has always been true. Rate-drops don't always cure recessions, but its one of the first moves a central bank will make to try to fix a recession.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FEDFUNDS

That's 2020, 2007, 2000, 1990, 1981, 1979 where a recession immediately caused a rate-drop.

We have to go all the way back to 1974 before we had inflation so high that the central bank kept rates high even during a recession. (Dropping rates causes inflation, so its a balancing act). Even then, interest rates dropped to bring us out of the recession of 1974.

After that, we have 1969, 1959, and 1957 recessions, all three of which caused interest rates to drop.

So 9/10 times, a recession caused an immediate drop in interest rates. And the last 1 time (1974), the recession _eventually_ caused the bankers to drop rates.

> Consider as well the cost of “printing money” if the rate reaches double digits, and the cost of refinancing the existing debt load.

You've got it backwards. Increases rates destroy money. Lower-rates print money.

That's why the central bank lowers rates during recessions, its an indirect way to print money (or perhaps more accurately, expand M2).

Raising rates, like what we're doing today, destroys money (or more accurately, contracts M2). We're destroying money today with 5%+ interest rates because we've seemingly made too much in the 2020 recession / COVID19.
Most of the things that seem like good ideas for KYC, such as DMCA claims, are better to be rendered nonexistent in the first place.
It would be a good thing if the requested solution wasn’t extremely simple
I tend to stick to LTS releases, but that certainly doesn't stop gnome's endless quest to remove everything!
> Apple's feels too much like a polished devkit, not like a consumer-ready product

Pretty sure that's why it's $3500 and has Pro in the title.

This is not a device for consumers.
It's easy to imagine because it already happened in the mid-late 00s with the first attempt at software dev cost reduction when companies tried outsourcing to cheap, underqualified labor in India, Bangladesh, etc.

Being the person who comes in to salvage a software disaster is a hell of a different career than a greenfield cloud startup dev or FAANG proto-pusher, but it can be extremely profitable. and yes, I suspect the demand for that type of software expert will be on the rise.
That how food poisoning works on TV. It's not how food poisoning typically works in reality. https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/symptoms.html
Yes. I have an org issued machine with crap specs and dozens of repos I switch between all day long. Waiting 30s-2m doesn't sound like much but it breaks flow and leads to a lot of "what was I doing again...?" Sidetracks
Beyond the snark, this is basically it. It's the same reason the Roman Empire, despite all its technological prowess, never tried hard to automate relatively low-hanging-fruit tasks: because slaves were cheap, plentiful, and more flexible ("reprogrammable") than anything mechanical could ever be.

If it costs $1m p/y to run a machine that cooks burgers and fries, or $30k for an employee who can do that _and_ cover something else when someone else is ill, it's a no-brainer. But businesses had to discover that the hard way; until the 80s, most people were still convinced automation would win everywhere, because it had won (and won big) in manufacturing. A combination of factors, from the '80s onwards, made labor costs effectively fall, which created our reality where certain jobs are so cheap that automating them makes no sense.

The "problem" is that, in certain regions, software development costs reached a point where automation looks very, very appealing. If a machine costs 500k p/y to replace a few 150k p/y SWEs without all those pesky employment complications, businesses will happily choose "AWS AI CloudDeveloper"...
How much drug deaths in Singapore again?
Probably because it says in Rust. In Rust we trust.
There's zero evidence that AML laws have actually led to any reduction in crime, while there's countless evidence of them causing unnecessary difficulty to law-abiding citizens. AML proponents should be required to demonstrate that the measures they propose actually lead to an empirically measurable reduction in crime, otherwise it's just a massive violation of citizens' financial privacy rights for no gain.
There's nothing special about the browser. Bitmap images are blurred by fractional scaling. That is inevitable.
My guess is the same: that to add structural integrity during the first phase of implosion, so as to guide the implosion process better (rather than having a piece of the pit fly out, say), you'd want to weld the pieces with little plutonium columns between them. I doubt that's how modern bombs work.
I lived in SF for ~1.5y, and it's not NYC, and I did not like it too much, but it certainly has some of the city conveniences and is not a car-hell suburb. (I lived in a building with ~10 units in Castro, which was cool)

But my question remains - how do you scale up your approach to the already-full SF? How do you make it more affordable, as prices are insane due to demand >> supply?
Or do you just envision a more sprawled, but similarly dense SF as the solution?
What does TFA mean here? Trifluoroacetic Acid?
Hi Lewri!

I suppose I can answer a few questions about the history.

Peter Crawley (Corsix) built the original versions of CorsixTH back in 2009. I made my first significant contribution in 2012 when I added movies. Now I am the oldest active contributor and Windows packager. I primarily work on the engine and leave the scripting to others.

Lewri joined in 2020 and brought a lot of energy back to the project, improving community outreach, bug triaging, patching and keeping everyone talking.

Alan runs the distinct but parallel Android port which was recently started again after a long hiatus.

A number of other developers are currently active and can be found in our discord/matrix channel.
The first thing that comes to mind is charging for access to your community members for promotions. For example: "Have you seen the new software XYZ that helps founders to ___"
> To sum up, KYC does not protect individuals

This is true, but it's also not the point. KYC isn't about protecting individuals - it's about protecting the system (financial and geopolitical) as a whole.

Can it be defeated? Of course it can. But it's not the sole line of defense against these sorts of things - it's part of a broader system comprised of internal bank security procedures, government monitoring and after-the-fact investigation of financial crimes.

I don't mean to say that everything written here is wrong, but this is a complex topic that has meaningful tradeoffs of security vs. being free of surveillance and convenience. This sort of blind CRPYTO GUD GUBMINT BAD writing that doesn't even pretend to attempt to understand its topic at any meaningful level of depth doesn't exactly contribute to the discourse.
> Realistically, KYC might deter a small fraction – let's say about 1% – of these malefactors.

I too can pull arbitrary statistics straight out of my backside, and use them to argue my point

Why not 10%? Why not 10000% in fact (if we’re comparing it to the number of current bad actors)?

Do you really think there wouldn’t be more tax cheaters if nobody did KYC checks? Come on…
> Legally in the United States you wouldn’t be able to do this with Apple today when applying that law because Apple does not have monopolistic market share

That depends on how you define a market. Apple has a monopoly on app distribution to iOS devices. The argument for defining it like is is persuasive because in the Microsoft case you could at least install an OS from another vendor. You can't do that with an iPhone. Your only relief is to buy a new phone from a different manufacturer.
Last commit was 5 years ago. I feel like this is 80% of the rails ecosystem nowadays.
I don’t think you’re naive.

Providing detailed instructions to computers to accomplish human/business objectives is the hard part about being a programmer.

But the level of abstraction has been increasing. It started as physically flipping switches then machine code then assembly then structured programming then object oriented programming and so on.

I remember during the 1990s with objects and VB custom controls people were talking that businesses would just hire a bunch of high school students to work part time just snapping components together like Legos.
Note that phase 4 is the final stage of the standard process. Tail calls are at phase 4, which means that is a finalized and complete standard.

All that is left after that is for VMs to implement the standard, which is tracked here:

https://webassembly.org/features/

Most major VMs do support tail calls today, but not all.
Since v1.0+ of this extension I have been constantly having issues with neovim's and VSCode's buffers got out of sync. I cannot reliably reproduce the issues however. There are a few similar reports, e.g. https://github.com/vscode-neovim/vscode-neovim/issues/1624. I've switched to other VIM extension (VSCodeVim) which I found more reliable, albeit less powerful.
can i build apps for this without owning one? can’t afford atm
The issue with corporations is the corporate veil. The corporate veil separates the rights and responsibilities of the corporation from the rights and responsibilities of the owner.

If the owner tries to use a corporation in such a way that it is merely an extension of their own person, the corporation is then subject to losing the corporate veil.

So why then, if the rights and responsibilities of the corporation are legally distinct, and the law enforces a separation of intent and personalities, should the right of the individual get through to the corporation?

The answer is that it shouldn't. The entire point of the corporation is that the rights and responsibilities of the corporation are not the rights and responsibilities of their owners. There is no reason why any right at all of the owner should percolate to the corporation.

Sole proprietorships, partnerships, and general associations do not have this separation. The rights and responsibilities are the same. So of course the rights of the owners should be available to their entity.

There is nothing arbitrary here. It's perfectly sensible, it's how every other country in the world does it, and it's how it was intended in the US as well. On the contrary, the idea that there is no such separation for some rights but there is for others is bizarre.
I think it's just that everybody has been looking for THE editor, and so it is natural that people would develop their own. I think what we're seeing is that VSCode is becoming THE editor (if it's not already there). At this point it's hard to compete. I think the biggest contender is IntelliJ, as many people really seem to enjoy it, but I would predict that it's going to be hard to fight against free.
If we’re doing self promo, I’ve got something similar but significantly smaller in scope:

https://github.com/EmNudge/watlings
Okay, just as a counterpoint, I opened 2 10,000 line files and tried to do a diff between them in VSCode. It took more than 20 seconds?

Yes, it breaks workflow and is incredibly slow.

Just like refreshing elements in UI shouldn't take multiple seconds, or a webpage shouldn't take multiple seconds to load on a good connection.
There is a guy on YouTube, who repairs Apple devices (or laptops?), and who shows, that not even their hardware is actually good. In one specific case they built in a part, that again and again in previous models failed, in the same function. Sent in laptops for repairs with the defect did not get a better part, but instead sloppily soldered on old parts as a replacement. If I find the link withib edit allowed time, I will update this comment.
>The article goes on to immediately compare KYC with widespread facial recognition. Why are these equivalent

They're both violations of people's privacy.

>There's no evidence provided for these numbers

And KYC proponents provide no empirical evidence that KYC has actually led to a measurable reduction in organised crime. The onus should be on them to demonstrate why it's effective enough to justify the violation of citizens' privacy that it entails.
ChatGPT is not de-obfuscating this code. For one thing:

> basic cellular automaton algorithm

is completely wrong. A cellular automaton is a standard approach to level-generation in a roguelike, but this code implements a different approach, the rooms-and-corridors one.

Another issue here is that ChatGPT is using a few key context clues to make its (incorrect but plausible) guess. Robert Nystrom, aka munificient, is well-known in the roguelikedev community for his game programming tutorials. I confirmed that ChatGPT knows who he is by asking "Who is @munificentbob and what is he known for?" The name of the function, "cave", that carves rooms makes it clear that this is some kind of level-generation algorithm - in fact, that's probably where the incorrect guess about cellular automata came from, because those algorithms are often used for "caves" (versus "dungeons" made with rooms-and-corridors). The characters printed are also roguelike standards.

If I remove @munificient's name and rename "cave" to "X", ChatGPT's output is worse. It says: "This code is a compact implementation of a simple game where characters move around a grid.", which is...vaguely in the ballpark.
getting acquired by a big tech who wants to catch up with Microsoft's dominance in developer tools is one possible out
I think it's that people often aren't presented classics in the right context. I LOVED Moby Dick, but it's because I played Dishonored and wanted more of the whaling theme.

But if I had to read it for school? I would have hated it.
If all Vision Pro does is become an iPad for your face i.e. content consumption.

Then it will be a $30 billion a year business for Apple.
This is definitely an interesting position, but it's an argument that needs to be backed up with solid evidence about the costs and ineffectiveness of KYC. This post contains zero such evidence, and as such, is entirely worthless.
Are the expensive Macbooks, iPhones, iPads, Airpods ending in Pro also not for consumers because they're for professionals?
I did not initiate a conversation with you. You're self-important, under-informed, and over-confident in your "analysis," and worst of all unable to communicate without drawn out pontification about things you clearly have zero experience with.
You have to be participating in a torrent swarm in order to bootstrap yourself into DHT at all. Bittorrent's DHT is not a network independent of torrent swarms. You need the address of a peer who is already part of the network in order to join it, and you have to get a list those addresses from somewhere.
what about meta raybans
Security training, usually mandated by some insurance policy, regulation or something else, typically lists "disgruntled employee" as the number one internal security threat.

Cutting off access prior to or immediately following notification of termination is more or less the only remedy to prevent data exfiltration from such a person.

Even if there were some programmatic way to ensure they could only email internal addresses, there are still some risks. I think it'd be worth implementing myself, though I can see it being rather difficult or impossible to set up depending on how the company's email is run.
I've heard a similar story as well. I think the US factories is partially owned by Panasonic and the Shanghai one is partially owned by CATL.

I don't think Tesla really hired any battery engineers or R&D either come to think of it.

If they did, they would have had an R&D office in Japan or SK who are leaders in Battery Chemistry but I don't think they have a presence there at all.

Most likely Tesla and Panasonic are co-sharing IP with Tesla taking a lead on Battery Management Software (a very hard problem) and Panasonic on Battery Manufacturing and Efficiency (an equally hard problem)
How about we set up a parallel banking system with none of the rules and regulations, and see what happens?

Oh yeah we did that a few years ago and it was scams all the way down :)
Came here to post this.

Having worked in an industry with strict kyc requirements and worked for a well known payment processor, if they were only catching 1% then some truly absurd amount of business is fraudulent.
Their hope is that he will recognized and denied service or treated with kid gloves by other airlines.
I'm in the same boat in that I get hungry when I exercise, however I also seem to crave healthier foods when I do. For whatever reason, that protein + salad that wouldn't satisfy me prior to excercising perfectly hits the spot when I do. I have to guess there's a whole lot of biological signals + psychology happening there.
Not for my Framework 13 laptop. There’s only one screen resolution option. Even when I don’t have it plugged into my 4K external monitor, Wayland’s fractional scaling looks atrocious on Ubuntu 22.04.
I waffle whether I agree with you. On the one hand, it makes sense to tell the user that clicking that juicy print button isn't going to work. On the other, it's a popup they'll have to dismiss telling them some recoverable error they cannot do anything to fix.
It's definitely not a constant cost, presumably due to the link-time optimization that rustc does. I've had binaries go from 800kB to 6MB simply by switching from getopts to the clap crate, for example.
The claim, with admittedly limited consensus, is that a difference in degree becomes a difference in kind: we’ve known “forever in AI years” that restricting the inputs, and loss, and parameter dimensionality is right up there with the underlying architecture in terms of the properties those latent geometries exhibit. It’s even kind of a meme: the fingers problem (which neither Sora nor V-JEPA partisans seem to be claiming is “solved”).

I’m a little oversubscribed at the moment so I haven’t downloaded the weights and played around with V-JEPA. The fact I’m pointing out that I could should make it pretty clear which way I lean on this: everyone wants to make money, let’s be real, but some seem resigned to “infinite, government-enforced monopoly via OpenPhilanthropy bribery” isn’t going to fly, so let’s at least prove how the sausage is made.

It’s fairly uncontroversial that things in the neighborhood of a “bottlenecked” VAE are often forced to exploit structure if it’s there.

This (claimed) result is about a way to exploit more of this structure/symmetry economy (greedy-ish optimizer) to pull the latent representations into yet a higher “effective regime” than yet demonstrated, with excellent properties around machine economics.

Representation learning isn’t new (though LeCun is an acknowledged pioneer in it), and constraints as a powerful tool isn’t new (causal making in attention architectures shouldn't ruffle many feathers).

Self/semi/unsupervised learning isn’t novel. But likewise, not are they k-equivalent synonyms: Dean et al. were distinguishing between Continuous Bag of Words and skip-gram in word2vec in 2013.

But it does cool shit (I like the I-JEPA reconstructions as a go to slide deck raster), and it’s available weight.

I think the truth shall soon emerge.
Opened in macOS and it appears impossible to open a folder of any sort. I type the folder path into the Open Folder thing at the top and it just silently fails.

There's no menu or anything to open a folder either. This seems lacking some _basic_ UX principles that should never be overlooked.

I did eventually figure it out and the TS integration doesn't work at all. The file browser icons constantly and consistently do not render correctly.

Guess this is something to check back in on in a year or three. It's a long way away from being complete, let alone usable.
>It is also about material efficiency and time efficiency. People want stuff NOW.

Also, if you have a $1M machine then the machine-time really adds up.
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/price-tracker-plugin
This is the URL of the page they redirect you to if they detect the plugin.
"SPEC has ruled that the compiler used for this result was performing a compilation
that specifically improves the performance of the 523.xalancbmk_r / 623.xalancbmk_s
benchmarks using a priori knowledge of the SPEC code and dataset to perform a
transformation that has narrow applicability."

Does this mean that if I use their compiler in production I might get worse performance because they apply this optimization to my own code as well?
> No demo at all

This is how the majority of companies actually build and release products.

You do demos behind closed doors to investors/board before showing the public.
Yes. Statistics are fragile indicators well beyond the Central Limit Theorem minimal sufficient boundaries. They work pretty good when you have tons of data and run tons of repetitions, but for moderate sized data and repetitions you need very high certainty levels for statistics to help much.

You can play perfect blackjack and card count at a table with good rules and lose plenty because your advantage is small (< 2%) and your repetitions are limited.

Statistics get even worse when the probabilities are chained because the weakest estimator bounds the rest.

Essentially, if you always follow statical advice you should do better than average, if you're lucky. There are better heuristics than statistics in most fields of human decision making.
Especially on this site and community one would expect, that the network effect is a widely known phenomenon.
How to make self-hosted maps that work everywhere and cost next to nothing
I guess the takeaway is that a public torrent site can (probably) never be sustainable while acting in users' best interests?
Some corporate employees use a notebook loaded with extremely invasive and performance-degrading security and spying software that can't be uninstalled. When your available cpu and disk time is 10% of what the hardware can do, you need as efficient editor as you can get.
Or the Germans that their ancestors also settled in the Frankenreich and they should of course be on good terms with them!

Or Franken (i.e. parts of Bavaria) that they're Bavarian.

Or English that many of them are part French nowadays (think Normans).

Or ...

History is messy. People are messy. Mostly vengefully so unfortunately. This is why we can't have nice things.
I don't want to repeat all the arguments already said by others in this thread so all I had to add is that any monopoly can and does eventually end up abusing it's power for profit. Now it's towards developers and competitors, tomorrow it could be towards users aka you.

The fact that you don't see a problem with that is the issue because you seem to assume that Apple is and will always be on your side and looking after your best interest.
Author of the post here—

They are emoji. I've added plain text to the table now, so it is readable without them.

edit: I've used a workaround to display emoji as images now