skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Don't know about the person you replied to but I would fork up $40 - $50.
Exists one important thing, many people don't aware of. When some good smart team (business or not it is not much important), focus on some task and have corresponding resources, it really could make things, impossible for universal team, targeted for some wide outcome.

What I see, NVIDIA is good, strong team, they bet very high stakes, when made great acquisitions in 2000s and they won. But NVIDIA made wide targeted product, they cannot made very narrow focus on just neural net. So it is possible to make NN product better then NVIDIA.

Real question is to predict, if Altman team could achieve so good economy, to pay expenses for hardware development.
Diamond Salt is still made this way north of Detroit. Almost all restaurant salt in the United States is sourced here.
In-memory compute is very easy, you just don't have to fall for the pipe dream of using the same process for both the memory and the compute.
All you have to do is follow a package on package strategy like we already do with smartphones. A Raspberry PI 5 gets 25GB/s memory bandwidth and it only has a single DRAM chip if I recall correctly.

So if you had a DIMM with 16 of these chips, you would already be on the same bandwidth as HBM. 96 DIMMs and you get 40TB/s memory bandwidth.
How does that relate to "one can approach the questions as likelihood of being hassled", I don't understand it in this context.

"Is a WWII tank/pram/scooter a vehicle in the park?" - those original questions? Or my suggested alternative which was "should the police should intervene*"? Is the commenter they saying that people might answer based on whether they think they would expect to be hassled for doing those things? Or answer whether people doing those things should be hassled by passers-by? Or what?
Apple argues against right-to-repair bill that would reduce its control
No. It’s the bottom 80% of income earners. The post seems to make that perfectly clear, and explains why that measure is used.
> That's 646 square feet. That's 25'5"x25'5". For an urban area, that's plenty of space.

It's not. And this is the total space, including the bathroom and the kitchen.

> That doesn't mean literally every apartment is that small

You are right, some are even smaller: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/03/business/tiny-apartments-...

And all while just a hundred miles away, beautiful historical houses can be bought for literally nothing. And that's with a rapidly declining population.
If you ditch the cables altogether it's a blast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqCyTM1bF6Q
Huh, I like that theory. Nobody else has ever mentioned experiencing the same thing as I do, though.
> work remotely from abroad for US companies

What specifically does this mean? Is a British citizen who works at the Google / Meta / Goldman Sachs office in London such a person?
This shows what people mean when they say Emacs is easy to extend. I don’t think most popular editors will let you code an extension like this in 167 lines including all boilerplate, comments, and documentation.
People want to live near evisting jobs so your someplace new will be a suburb and generally has constraints because of that. You have to get people into the city for example which forces car dependance for example.
Good point. Much of the dissaving is by the bottom 20%, which probably consists of many retirees with low incomes who are spending down their accumulated assets.
Show HN: Generate RDB DDL/DML from GraphDB
uhhh, 100ms isn't particularly stringent for a local system... nor should be the tolerance for the impact of control in a system that's literally at rest.

unless we're playing soccer / free-kicks, in which case, yeah, overengineer the hell out of it, sport.

ps, chapter 5 precisely specifies tolerances and minimums for things like latency of specific controls, for a control system for heavy machinery intended to be controlled by a human... and thanks for your input.
I agree that solo travel is a perfect candidate for the AVP. If I spent an appreciable amount of time in hotel rooms I'd probably keep mine.

> Plus I wrote the OS for the prototype, so I'm biased :)

That's pretty awesome. As I've said multiple times the UI/UX is by far the best I've ever used in VR/AR. Text entry is rough but pairing a keyboard solves most of that. The eye tracking isn't perfect and sometimes frustrating but the vast majority of the time it works very well. Really it's the iPad apps where eye tracking struggles the most, mainly if they never supported pointer devices and if their UI is too close together.
If a planet in the nearest star harbors life form that launched a rocket, would we know?
Related submission from yesterday:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39319746 - JSON Parsing: Intel Sapphire Rapids versus AMD Zen 4 - 40 points and 10 comments
Anybody got a TL;DW (didn't watch)?
> Prices surged. Before the surge, professionals had this dream of owning.

You're literally repeating the joke.

A doctor asks a nurse:

- Was the patient sweating prior to death?

- Yes.

- Good, that's a good sign.

> Or you assertion of "declining population"? Maybe on the national level, but it's not true of Tokyo!

Indeed. And that's my point. Tokyo, like a leech, is sucking the life from its surroundings.

> And what is the difference in cost between renting and owning? Perhaps renting is affordable, but ownership is extremely expensive becuase of irrational speculation or temporary macro factors?

No. They are not temporary. The prices will not fall, they have been steadily growing for the last 2 decades.
Income tax is a non-issue for the issues covered in this post, except that they are one of multiple things that draw down household assets.
The first footnote just turns me off: zero moderation means everything becomes 4Chan? How about the usual systems of vote ranking, reputation scores based on voting history to enable or disable posting power, etc? I think that a community can easily hit 90% of quality with just a few simple rules, a tiny number of human mods to handle a few egregious cases where someone obviously but cleverly circumvent said rules (like when people started spelling racial slurs through 1 letter tweet replies stacked), and a massive amount of crowd distributed power to reward what a critical mass wants.
20 billion is a long time, and the universe is very big. And we're not the first galaxy to form within that 20 billion year time frame.

It's very likely we're not the first in the universe and it's also likely we're not alone in coming to sentience at this very moment in the universes life.
> Isn't that exactly how things improve? When you can reduce the cognitive load on bookkeeping, you can accomplish more productive work.

What are you talking about? Sure you can appear to be more productive if you are reckless and wasteful of resources, and adding more resources means there is more that you can afford to waste.

But for the past decade or so we have been seeing what happens if you teach every software developer that it's okay to waste resources: resources get wasted.

Back when you couldn't afford to waste resources, you'd see extremely skilled optimizations and extremely clever hacks to get advanced software to run on extremely slow and primitive CPUs. But ever since computing power increased by a couple orders of magnitude, what happens? The exact same software implemented by today's developers would more than compensate for the increased computing power by being a couple orders of magnitude less efficient.

Sure it expands the universe of possibilities. I do want more resources, I really do. But "reducing the cognitive load on bookkeeping" is making software get slower faster than hardware gets more powerful. Which is absolute insanity to me.
Snow Crash is more likely. I agree with you on the Turing police, except instead of monitoring actual emergent intelligence they'll be mall cops harassing people who train for too many epochs.
The problem is raising a huge amount of money, and this is the solution, which is something Sam is very good at. The utility seems purely financial.
Sounds somewhat like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advogato#Trust_metric - not sure how well it actually worked.
It's an interesting point, but I doubt it's the lions share of egress that's going to other data centers vs to customers. Fan out is where it gets expensive.
They have nearly impossible to solve maintenance issues unless you use special chemicals and maintenance procedures, and unless you wash/flush them (and the surroundings) regularly the urine smell is hard to deal with.

Since most maintenance staff don’t do the special procedures properly (and barely manage to deal with normal toilets properly!) they were a big headache. [https://www.waterless.com/blog/the-pros-and-cons-of-selectin...].

Everywhere I know of that was using them eventually got rid of them because they weren’t worth it for the small water savings they actually got.

Especially since water usage was never anything but a hot button PR topic - there are probably only a handful of places humans habitate that the difference is actually non-negligible when you factor in showers, landscaping, etc.
SAX is a push parser, presumably this is on top of a pull API like StAX.

The Jakarta JSON streaming API sort of gets at this (sort of):

https://jakarta.ee/specifications/platform/9/apidocs/jakarta...

The basic interface to a JSON document is something like an iterator, which lets you advance through the document, token by token, and read out values when you encounter them. So if you have an array of objects with x and y fields, you read a start of array, start of object, key "x", first x value, key "y", first y value, end of object, start of object, key "x", second x value, key "y", second y value, end of object, etc. Reading tokens, not anything tree/DOM-like. But there are also methods getObject() and getArray(), which pull a whole structure out of the document from wherever the iterator has got to. So you could read start of array, read object, read object, etc. That lets you process a document incrementally, without having to materialise the whole thing as a tree, but still having a nice tree-like interface at the leaves.

In principle, you could implement getObject() and getArray() in a way which does not eagerly materialise their contents - each node could know a range in a backing buffer, and parse contents on demand. But i don't think implementations actually do this.

Wrapping a tree-like interface round incremental parsing that doesn't require eager parsing or retaining arbitrary amounts of data, and doesn't leak implementation details, sounds astoundingly hard, perhaps even impossible. But then i am not Daniel Lemire. And i have not read the paper.
AWS Lightsail is actually pretty good, comparable to Linode (except it maxes out at 7 TB/month).

https://aws.amazon.com/lightsail/pricing/
Website is a bit jumbled on mobile, just a heads up.
If you’re looking at the consumer expenditure survey, it’s tally of household expenditures this is about 40% of BEA personal consumption expenditures. And it’s surveyed income measures are also dicey. It’s excellent for knowing which income quintiles do which shares of consumption, though.
Writing machine learning models in pure SQL
I love love love XML, but when I encounter an effort to use it to carry presentation like HTML alongside executable code -- such as Apache Jelly -- I regret the choices that brought me to that place in my life.

I wouldn't call OPML a good example of XML for reasons I detail elsewhere in the thread. But if you need a subscription list of feeds for import or export it's alright.
^is this a bad response to someone who’s showing something off?
If everyone could agree on behavior in a common space, we wouldn't have politics, or even government. We would just all agree on something and then go about our lives. Internet moderation is just governance for the private sector.
This is essentially a debate on legal interpretation. There are 3 traditional approaches:

1. Common law (determined by precedent), the UK system.

2. Civil law (determined by textual interpretation of a code), the US system.

3. Qadi law. (determined by a local judge who rules according to the local societal norms and current context, neither by text nor precedent), the Ottoman/Islamic system.

[1] https://www.britannica.com/topic/qadi
A LLM might "believe" that horses are built in factories.
Most legal systems have the concept of necessity as a defense to breaking laws. If the only/best way to prevent some worse outcome is to break the law, then the lawbreaking is excused. There's usually no need for each law to have its own exception for life-threatening emergencies.
I'd say it works quite well here. The author is assuming disagreement on HN is some kind of failure. I don't see it that way at all, and sometimes even make comments on opposite sides of an issue within the same issue just because I recognize compelling points in a controversial topic. It's the topics that get monopolar responses that are the least useful and interesting to me.
What's to stop Hedge Funds or other "investors" from buying these houses up?

Houses have to be owner occupied, not investment vehicles. I know, I know "what about rentals", etc? When it comes to rentals may be the Vienna mode?
There is no code to crack. Just build more housing and it will become affordable. If it’s not affordable, you haven’t built enough yet.

It’s crazy how these cities will try literally anything except building more housing.
Might read the title of that table again.
We preserve too much garbage. Many buildings are marked hastoric despite there being nothing historic about them. Them you can't insulate them, and other such things.
Ah, appreciate it. I totally spaced on cleaning up the landing page for mobile!
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/02/opinion/nocera-how-punch-...

A family committed to journalism. What is Zuckerberg committed to. Building bunkers in Kauai.
I've spent a small fortune on a camera, teleprompter, mounting, and time (seeing up OBS and streamdeck) to get something similar working for me during COVID.

(I spend a good deal of my time giving online training.)
In Linux, you use cgroups to confine a process to a fixed memory limit that won't cause an OOM in adjacent processes. You can create a separate memory cgroup with a different allowance for each customer depending how much memory is allotted to them per the contract, for example.

You can also use ulimit with a hard memory limit, but cgroups are more fine grained and flexible.

Also do note that the point about the read-only mmap still holds – it can't cause an OOM, it is mmap'd pages pointing to dirty pages that have not been written out to the file system yet that can – on the condition their number is growing uncontrollably and/or fast.

P.S. But allowing a database to cause an OOM is never a good idea to start off with whether memory limits have been set or not – the data loss is unacceptable for a database, and databases have been optimised to operate within pre-configured space constraints that do not even require ulimit/cgroup in the first place. Perhaps fixing the database configuration is a better starting point rather than going down the rabbit hole with mmap(2).
> parsing required props and such out of this destructuring assignment is a bit magical, but to be honest in my view not significantly more magical than the rest of Svelte.

I think this is the only place we really disagree. To me, the export syntax is obvious and consistent, even if under the covers the behaviour is magical.

On the other hand, the $props syntax is not obvious; for a putative assignment to result in a declaration has no basis in my previous experience. Both the syntax and the behaviour is magical.

If Svelte is about the vibe, Svelte 4 was perfect for me - it’s why I moved from Vue, which I found had too many magic objects, and then doubled down on it with Vue 3 (I think) and refs. With Svelte 5, I feel it’s making the same mistake - the vibe no longer gels with me, and I gotta say, in addition, that pushing reactive behaviour into pure JS feels like a huge mistake to me. Sadly, I think I’ll be getting off this particular train.

Edit: I think my reaction to this is because $props - and the other runes - are effectively svelte-specific keywords added to JavaScript. I'm sure the Svelte folks have their reasons for this; but I hate it. They could have just introduced a new actual keyword, like "prop myProp = 5". I honestly can't see myself ever adopting Svelte 5.
Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search with Window Filters
> Isn’t that the point? That some people who really don’t want the job won’t invest a bit of their time and people who do really want the job will?

Would you rather have an employee who wants the job, or an employee who is good at the job?
That might work nicely with a lot of the sparse matrix research going on too, since I suspect that the trust matrix should be very sparse
The game is a bait and switch. I followed the directions faithfully, and said that the ambulance was breaking the rule. But then it seemed to lower my score. Turns out I wasn't supposed to follow the rule, I was supposed to guess how others would follow the rule. That should have been clear from the instructions.
I use prezi video. But it’s very clunky. So really I use Canva for creating the slides and then Prezi video.

This seems much much better.

If it’s as good or better I’ll drop Prezi and switch completely. Pricing seems good, I don’t share the same opinion of many commenters here. Perhaps because I’m on zoom all day both in 1:1 and 1:many including workshops where I’m the speaker then I might be the right ICP

Could you do a comparison with Prezi Video ?
what is the name of this startup? So i can read about it?
Adding more layers can add context, which can improve communication, which solves (or at least improves) the problem of conflict arising from poor communication.
I did a few of those tours when I lived out there. They were very cool
> Europe is a lost cause.

I can't say I share your perspective, but then again living in Europe I'm probably not objective.
Eh, people like to extrapolate by analogies. Doesn't actually mean that it's true.

We can only reasonably speculate using our existing knowledge base. Doesn't mean that people literally think we know all there is to physics. People even acknowledged that it's incomplete.
If you already know it's validated and coming from a trusted source there is no reason to validate it again. For example json from a database that only allows inserting valid json. In such cases even the structure might be known and some assumptions can be safely made.
Interesting, I just pulled this the other day. Average (mean) bottom-20 household has 18 K in checking deposit assets and 200 K in total assets. even while that quintile’s income caps at $32K. America is a very rich country…
Does everything you just said apply to firearms as well?
That would not sit well with all sorts of regulators, may not be the best counter-argument?
I've seen similar, although in my cases the wrong answers turned out the be useful. They used commands or functions or APIs that I had not known about, and when I looked into those found that they could solve my problem when used correctly.
If I am understanding correctly, did you consider the option of calculating weights in the client?
There’s currently a single men epidemic, yet polyamory is a rounding error in terms of popularity. I’d be interested in evidence to the contrary, but it seems doubtful that multiple partners would cause the problems you mention.
The wealth affect literature is skimpy and not very good, and heck, the Keynesian consumption function that pretty much every model uses doesn’t even have a wealth term.
Sarcasm, you fool
That’s 55 Celsius. Doesn’t sound too bothersome. What if they hide somewhere? Does 130F/55C just kill them at once?
This is the first and last game that kept me engaged for a continuous 24 hours when I discovered the multiplayer.
You can also implement includes in couple (tens) of lines of AWK: https://maximullaris.com/revamp_define.html#mglwnafh
If someone wanted to extend OPML into another domain, even if they got others to agree on their proposed type value and the new attributes added to support that type, there's nothing to stop a collision with somebody else choosing the same attribute names.

There also is nothing to stop the author of the OPML specification from opposing the new type.

It would be far easier to create a new XML format.
Second longest coastline in the world.

Fjords run deep into the country.
Maritime society.

Major lumber exporter.

The UK agreed to a median line split for divvying up oil fields.

A tiny island 17km off shore gave Norway 85% of the most productive oil field in the North Sea.

Oil and gas companies operating in Norway come under the control of the government after 100 years.

A low corruption society was in place prior to the appearance of oil wealth.

The sovereign wealth fund has a strictly capped draw down to prevent politicians from looting it.
We might also ask why EE specialists (and indeed half of STEM) needs to fall back to software engineering to get meaningful and stable employment, but capitalism probably does not like us asking these pesky questions.
2 seconds isn't terrible. Instant would be nice but I don't really ever notice loading time. It's faster than I can ever remember it being in the past.

Security is also better than I can remember at any previous point, including pre-internet.

Privacy is pretty terrible by most coders standards, but that's probably less of a technical thing and more of a "It does exactly what it was designed to because free stuff where you're the product sells really well" issue.
That makes me wonder the entire global cost of things like world war 2. Anyone have relevant links? I can't find any.
Google's "standard" bandwidth pricing is about 15%-45% cheaper than "premium", which is admittedly a significant discount, but it's still an order of magnitude more expensive than some of the other options on the list.
Do you remember where you saw that? The Census figures are much lower: $11k total assets at the 25th percentile, $-1.5k at the 10th.

https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publicatio...
Heh - that sounds like a really bad deal for the butterfly ?
sounds like a game-changer for virtual presentations. I'm impressed by how you've integrated various features like camera options, drawing capabilities, and smart scripts into one cohesive suite. It's fascinating to hear about your journey from Shoot Pro Webcam to squares.tv and now CueCam Presenter.
the real danger is not the spider eating you but vice versa!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiders_Georg
> We've added major features such as the try operator (?), const generics, generic associated types (GATs), and of course: async/.await. Out of those four features, three are what can be considered to be "effects".

I wouldn't call the try operator an effect, Result is a monad but it's quite different from the I/O monad in Haskell
Can you link that? I don’t see it.
Not OP, but I would guess the OP is asking about how many jobs are being offshored to other countries by US companies
I have a quip I have repeated for years that aligns with this:

The people talking about the stuff largely arent the people doing the stuff because theyre too busy doing the stuff.

Where, in my case, in our tech circle, that is generally design and development. Of course there are outliers.
I'm talking about purchase price, range, reliability, maintenance, total cost of ownership.
Any recommended reading on how this stuff truly works? I feel like I understand the core protocols (tcp, ip, bgp, etc) not not how the internet is ‘built’
Yeah, it's like we're playing cosmic detective trying to figure out if there's anyone else out there in the universe. The fact that we haven't seen any clear signs of alien civilizations doing their thing is kind of mind-boggling. It's like, are they just really subtle about it, or are we just super early to the party?
Integers were introduced in 5.3.
https://xns.tech