skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In addition - the OP in question is a 5-time IOCCC winner, including for the eponymous nanochess!

https://github.com/bormand/nanochess
I strongly doubt they would ever do something that drastic. It offers few benefits and many roadblocks. It would be a monstrous amount of work, would throw into question many existing security-related certifications, break Microsoft's love of backwards-compatibility, etc.
how do you get sit?
You can't sweep liberalism on the same heap as Nazism.
I think that each ideology has it's own weaknesses, but they are not the same.

What I learned from this general discussion though is that politics made a honest civil discourse difficult about these kinds of things.

Instead, we should talk about personally held values rather than sociological phenomena, as these have turned into political shibboleths.
There is a law about "artificial or prerecorded voice messages", the law was written in 1991 before modern voice generation programs so it might be unclear if it applies to them, the commission now declared that it does. This is often how it works in the U.S., congress passes a somewhat vague and general law, which authorizes an agency (in this case the FCC) to develop more detailed regulations.
how do you get stand or sit or walk?
Focused ultrasound can reach into the brain to relieve pain
Good joke, thanks, but I will explain anyway: to me 30 billion parameters or smaller is small since I can run it using Ollama on my home computer. I managed a deep learning team at Capital One and our ‘large’ models were less than 20 million parameters. :-)
I think people remember a Mozilla that never was. Mozilla was saved by Firebox which Mozilla the organization would have successfully blocked if their institutional processes were not the reason their community was frustrated.

I don't think their processes have ever been better, they got initial and later injections of code from outside. Rust/servo was the moment when I thought they might turn it around, but their bus has always gone in the direction of the same cliff.
Fitting, in my opinion.
Not sure how big your property is, but I have a Sun Joe which is great, only complaint is the bag could be a little bigger.
Farmers were peaceful because they were in a position of privilege over many other businesses. It was being subjected to the same pressure that everyone else was that caused issues.

I get that that would be a hard transition, but you don’t get to say “they were peaceful before when others weren’t” when the lack of peacefulness from others was largely because they weren’t getting the same support and protection that these groups were getting, especially when they’re directly demonstrating in their responses now that they fundamentally agree with the issues that caused prior protests and riots, now that those issues also impact them.
After Figma’s $20B windfall evaporated, it’s picking up the pieces
This whole line of discussion is weird - Stalinism and the USSR was the definition of anti-conservative and authoritarian. Literally ideologically leftist to a polar extreme in many ways.

Authoritarians come in all ‘colors’.
> - slightly worse at coding

Is GPT-4 what one uses for coding? I thought specialized models were best?

I would imagine Google is focused on building a model that expands the types of things people associate with Search.
Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle wrote some great global disaster novels as well. Footfall and Lucifer's Hammer.
Show HN: How to use WSL Debugging [video]
That's glib.

No one is hired to fail, and no one tries to fail.

They're hired to try and succeed, and sometimes it doesn't go that way.
A large language model the size of a small language model.
Yup great for business, horrible for users - just get lock in and keep paying. But great business idea.
Avoid directly indexing if possible. Use the collection functions and slices instead.
'Human progress' would appear to be the most seductive end to justify any means, judging by 20th century.
You haven't even provided a source for the 10k number, so I'm not sure how I'm supposed to argue against it.

> 10K in a country with a population of 330M is pretty low compared to much of the world. But we can probably do better

I agree that would be a mostly low rate, but we aren't even close to that. There are not even 10k people dying of starvation in the US.

> "no one has to starve" to which I am simply asking "then why is anyone starving?"

Most of the PEM number in the US is due to people who have some sort of wasting disease in the hospital. There are also some rare cases of people starving who are elderly and suffering from severe dementia (other rare cases: people with ED who do not receive intervention soon enough). If you want to count those as starvation, sure - but even then it doesn't cover 10k.

> just kinda flailing at me with derisive ad-hominem invective

I called you ideologically driven after your initial content-free mocking reply. You've called my claims bizarre and said I suck at parties. I don't think that this is a case of a one-sided derisive attack.

> Personally, I'm just looking for this information on the internet

A few comments ago you were certain that 'so many' in the US were starving.

bye
The issue is foundational cannot be changed.

From Abottabad to Worse https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2011/07/osama-bin-laden-2011...
Two issues to me;

- No instrumentation of the broadcast, ie, responses to calls; receivers, even an individual listener, or the recorder listening at a given point. Your SLI for a terrestrial broadcast shouldn't be "a landscaper told me it was gone"

- Lack of business insurance. a $100,000 item that is imperative to your business seems like something that should be insured. Especially, if you don't have nearby site security, or live in a location that has hurricanes, and tornados.

I enjoy the comments that suggest a helicopter stole it for scrap metal because the fuel, flight time, and ground coordination would be significantly complex.

I theorize it wasn't a theft, but some party the poultry plant / city / county believed it was derelict, a safety issue, and an eyesore; And that nobody knew who to contact in a timely manner to have it removed.
Opening a terminal in admin window which means any commands you put in that windows will always have admin privilege, no matter what.

What does Sudo is to only provide the root/admin privileges for specific inputted command. Once it is done, it goes back to user privileges. This way, the terminal window didn't need to end the session to go back to user privileges.
Quoting Joseph Goebbels?

Bruce Schneier said: "Too many wrongly characterize the debate as 'security versus privacy.' The real choice is liberty versus control."

https://www.schneier.com/essays/archives/2006/05/the_eternal...
I think it's about proof that the number puts them in touch with a real person. I suspect if the robocall gets enough engagement they'll even put an actual scammer on their end.
Ah ok that makes sense then, thanks!
I don't think there's much evidence that these fraudulent robocalls have much of an impact, if any, either. You can tell a plausible story that they have the opposite effect (they tend to target the Black vote, and the Black vote is relatively well organized compared to other US voting blocs, and is sensitive to suppression). The people running these campaigns tend to be complete chucklefucks, so it doesn't follow from the fact that people are taking the time to do them that they actually work.
The article agrees:

> Of course, businesses have long segmented customers

The article's argument is that:

- This kind of segmentation is more widespread and automated than it was previously.

- It's appearing in areas it wasn't in before (e.g. Disney World).

- It's extending to public arenas like vaccine queues, access to public lands, and TSA queues.
My favorites from this writer
If everyone uses EPIC in your 'network', than yes, you will be fairly well covered. Step away to another system, and you're getting into more issues.
Well Mozilla got >$6.000.000.000 - so I do thing this is enough money. Do you think they would have needed more money?

Brave currently tries to grow from the secure niche. I think Chrome started from the developer niche, with developer tools, being embeddable, open sourcing a rendering engine etc.
> No wonder Americans can afford to all have single family homes with so much space

I live in one of the many states both smaller and less densely populated than Texas. As someone who immigrated to the US from a tightly-packed Asian country, the argument against immigration on the basis of "there's no room" never made any sense...
> This is conjecture, but "Ultra 1.0" probably indicates that they intend to release more models based on the Ultra configuration. Since that's the most commercial of theirs, I wouldn't be surprised if that comes with some stability promises (e.g. Ultra 1.0 is still available when Ultra 3.0 is released, so that if you do your own validation when integrating in your own project, you can expect small-to-no shifts in the underlying model)

Given that it's google. I would doubt it.

Ask how the original palm models are going.
If you buy a device for $3500+ and are to cheap to pay the tax of around $665(19%)
Why is the measure not a satisfactory answer?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)
America was very likely not named after Amerigo Vespucci - as you stated correctly, naming something after someone's first name is unlikely. It seems very plausible that it is named after the Amerrique mountains.
Yeah, I'd sure think so.

- A peer/neer-peer adversary can presumably throw a very large number of simultaneous drones at a USN vessel. I don't know how feasible it is rustle up 10 or 100 reliable simultaneous human suicide bombers.

- The jet ski drones can surely be physically smaller than a speedboat that needs to hold a human

- The jet skis can trade some of that size back and armor themselves against CIWS etc in ways that would be less practical for a suicide boat
To check the balance on a prepaid credit card I found on the ground (the modern equivalent of finding a $20 bill lol) I had to go through a prompt that said “press the number of the first digit of the following: eight, four, two”

So it works in some way for the CC companies at least.
ID.5 listed as least depreciating. Mine was 55k new less than a year ago and it’s worth 30k. Definitely not the 10% mentioned in the article.
The Crash of a $30B Property Empire
Leo Laporte discussed this on his This Week on Google show:

https://youtu.be/QjtboPHrsJI
I agree. The original reason [1] for the gemini name seems artificial for a generic chatbot. It is OK for the model, and I'm sure a lot of "work" was put into "validating" it for the assistant, or... was it?

[1] https://the-decoder.com/how-googles-gemini-ai-model-got-its-...
That's not the priority. The priority is tax cuts for the rich. I know it sounds snarky, but I don't see how, since I've said the actual truth (TM).
Have always felt conflicted about these policies. Real life works this way but somehow seeing people escorted to the front of the line violates the rules of having a line.
Show HN: Discover the ultimate search engine for movies and series
Navigate the vast ocean of film and series with our AI-driven discovery engine, overcome the paradox of choice and find your next gem with personalized, spot-on recommendations.
Part of dealing with Islamophobia would be dealing with problematic posts like yours ascribing intentions and emotionally charged sentiments to statements that display no such intention. Go ahead and exactly quote the scrutinizable statement in the post above you, please.
In NYC we’ve known of Sliwa for decades way before his mayoral run last election. Guy has a following but he’s known to fake conflicts for publicity and is generally considered a nut.

Unlike the movies, there really aren’t any sane proponents of vigilante justice.
How to escape being underpaid by ‘cloning’ yourself
Is nothing in our life private now? What about the need for privacy. Random ppl shouldn't know your financial holdings. We have a real lack of privacy now and easy access to the public records.
They are all assigned by address; so there are N elementary schools that feed into a single junior high (or middle school), and typically a junior high will feed into a single high school. So your friends move up with you unless someone moves.

This is all "typical"; there are many exceptions. Where I live now, they unified the secondary schools (i.e. junior-high and high-school) so that you can apply to go to a different junior-high or high-school than your local one, space permitting. Similarly where I grew up, you could apply to go to a different school, but a "legitimate academic reason" was required. People did game the system, most commonly by claiming they wanted to study a foreign language that was offered at the school they wanted to go to, but not the school they were in the district for.

I should note that where I grew up the school-system was unusually non-local in the sense that there was one system for the entire county (which was about half the land area of Saarland). Even then you were required to go to the local school though. More typical is that each town or city manages the schools for their area.
It's heating and "hot water". Icelandic building are both heated by the hot water supply, and that water runs directly to the hot water taps (sinks, showers etc.).

Well, "directly". It's now common to make use of a heat exchanger, so you're getting warmed-up cold water instead. E.g. the capital area adds sulphur to the hot water supply, so some don't want to use it directly.

But in either case, if the municipal hot water doesn't run houses have neither heat nor hot showers.

They'll also have icy driveways, a very common use of the runoff is to have a water-heated driveway make use of the outgoing hot water.
Hardly. Authoritarianism is what happens when ‘the right things don’t happen’ on their own based on ideology, so they need to be forced.

Like seizing farmland from landowners and forming collectives to farm them instead (USSR).

Or forcing affirmative action despite no identifiable discriminatory actions. Which is literally openly happening right now in the West in tech and other areas.

It’s about forcing reality to confirm to an idealized ‘right’ way, despite objections or resistance - including often ignoring if the final situation/state even works. Example: Chinese Great Leap Forward and rural steel ‘mills’, USSR and collectivism, etc.
An easy position to hold when it's physically impossible for a cyclist to harm you in your steel cage but you can kill them on a whim by slightly turning a wheel.
There's just the small matter of the Himilayas dividing mainland China from Pakistani ports.
Yes, or

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Swarm_(Sch%C3%A4tzing_nove...
> Just that you can run a single command as admin?

I mean, that's sudo's whole thing! [1] You can live your day to day terminal life without the risk of borking things too badly, then when you occasionally need to elevate to higher privileges you can do it easily for that specific command.

[1] Technically not the whole thing obviously, but it's a very common use case.
Things I want to donate for: Core Browser Development. Google disconnection.

Things I don't want to donate for: CEO inflation, marketing-tie ins, random acquisitions.
Indeed, he spelled it the right way, which is the wrong way. He should spell it wrong, which is the right way. :)

I think it is funny that this misspelling hasn't been fixed after all of these years. It was typo'ed in the original http spec in 1996: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_referer
Possible I missed it when I read it. Would need the author to indicate whether or not it was edited.

Yes, idiomatic Rust can cause a number of bounds checks to be elided when using iterators. Typically that's when you have all the data that you need to process up front. When you don't have that ability (e.g. data is being fed in piecemeal and you're copying into a temporary buffer), the bounds checking elision is something you need to do yourself.
this comment is really something
That or make it so egregious they boil over.
>and (most importantly) they have time.

>is "just" a retired engineer who made a big product and a lot of money.

Gernerally those 2 go hand in hand. You make something well known and they get dozens of emails a day about advice, business deals, the usual spam, and more.
Why? Do interstates also have border check points?
"However, if you can **spend a day**, you can **easily** create one yourself ..."

good ol easy-mode full-day task
If they end up hanging up and texting me out of confusion then that's the best outcome I could've asked for... otherwise the call is either from a receptionist (who generally speak first anyways) or a relative that has learned of my vocal recalcitrance.
I think they are trying to make the law more reasonable because there were police officers writing tickets for absurd stings. A person would step into the road and everyone would get tickets in the intersection. WA law seems rather convoluted but basically gives some room to use the road when the pedestrian is still out there. Probably more for those, I’m turning right at a red light and ped crossed the road, it’s clear to go now but someone is still technically in the crosswalk.

IMHO it's a slippery slope and vision of other cars can be obstructed by cars driving around pedestrians.

In general, people shouldn’t be doing 40mph within 10 feet of a pedestrian in the road (like they were in this case).

Anyway, I record this intersection because I see all kinds of carnage… 10 collisions in the past year next to a park. Human drivers are the worst
> One assumes you also don't believe in rights for religious groups, political parties, unions or the press?

In that statement, yes, but there's a ton of nuance to how that's applied.

> The reason rights apply to corporations is that rights apply to people in aggregate,

True, but corporate personhood captures the aggregate rights of people in a corporation only slightly more effectively than the 3/8 compromise captured the rights of slaves. If you're going to claim that the rights of a corporation are based in the rights of the people in that corporation, then you'd expect that the people in the corporation get to wield those aggregate rights equally, because they all have equal rights. But the reality is that a handful of people within a corporation get to wield those aggregated rights: executives and board members are literally taking the rights of their workers and wielding them in ways that often don't benefit the workers. That's not aggregated rights, that's an injustice.

> there is no way to deny rights to the group without denying rights to the individuals within that group

This is a pretty blanket statement. There are certainly some cases where a right cannot be denied to a group without denying rights to the individuals within a group. But it is abundantly clear that making it illegal for a corporation to pay for advertising, while allowing individuals to pay for speech or say things, is a restriction of the corporation's rights and not the individual's.

Again, you're free to say anything you like about products, that's your right. But a corporation has no right to pay people to say anything about their product.

> If rights only applied to individuals, then it would be trivial to suppress any political or cultural expression by making any collective gathering or expression illegal.

We've got a separate right to assemble which I believe in, so no, you're making a straw man argument on my behalf here.

And "collective expression" needs more explanation. Certainly, advertising does not represent the views of every individual in the corporation that advertises, so the idea that this is a "collective expression" is absurd. If anything, it's forcing speech on peons who had very little choice in what was said--if we're claiming their aggregate rights are being represented here, then the decision makers in what is said are violating their rights by not giving them input on what is said.

Put another way: it is well-established that forcing someone to say something is a clear violation of their right to free speech. So if the free speech rights of a corporation are the aggregate of the rights of the individuals, then there has to be unanimity within the corporation on what is said in order to not force that speech on the individuals in the corporation who might object to what is said.

> There is no reason to consider corporations a special case in this regard.

The central case is perfectly fine for my point: there is no group in existence which is capable of exercising my right to free speech. Even groups where I get to vote, so they theoretically represent me, do an extremely poor job of saying what I want said.
Whew, thank you!

I should probably get a similar device just to practice. This is an odd little operation I've been called upon to perform.
Terence Tao wrote a nice blog post about this: https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2012/12/29/a-mathematical-for...
Building robots for "Zero Mass" space exploration
In what business segment is Libre Office superseding MS Office? Furthermore, NT supports "personalities". Why bother with a full Linux kernel when they could adopt the personality a la SUA?
Nowadays I just grunt, I don't think they can voice print a grunt
Wonder how it compares to https://aws-lite.org/
PowerPC uses LL/SC for synchronisation, which is very different to the classic x86 approach. Maybe you didn't like that? But i think Alpha and ARM use that too.
I can imagine things get pretty high-stakes. In this particular situation, the school district they were zoned for was very similar, but it was just much less convenient to get the kids to school in the morning.

Curious about the downvotes — isn't this a relevant anecdote that shows the need for products like this one?
The story was published January 30th, plenty of time to inform the news paper about the error.

The lied about the use of GPL code by intentional obfuscation of GPL software use.
I believe the new window is to prevent SHATTER attacks (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shatter_attack), to ensure that a higher privileged process has a higher privileged Window. Is that not a concern anymore with this new sudo, or is there some other mitigation involved not?

EDIT: from the linked wiki page, "By design, all services within the interactive desktop are peers, and can levy requests upon each other. As a result, all services in the interactive desktop effectively have privileges commensurate with the most highly privileged service there."
Unfortunately, You are in a US bubble.

Globally, Google brand is 10x stronger than Microsoft for Small Businesses
> Doubling down on our core products, like Firefox

THERE IS NO OTHER PRODUCT
> they'll provide them to the Feds

That's too bad; methinks the Feds should also need a court order. Though, I suppose with FISA courts rubber-stamping warrants, it wouldn't even be a nuisance.
https://github.com/outlines-dev/outlines/blob/7fae436345e621... squares with my experience using LLMs for anything real

sequence = generator("Alice had 4 apples and Bob ate 2. Write an expression for Alice's apples:")
print(sequence)
# (8-2)

Then, there's a whole process around feeding the output of one LLM into another LLM for checking the checker .. I'm glad it works for some people some of the time to get some gains over 'doing it the old way'
I'm amazed that my beloved CHAOS still runs beautifully on emulators like DOSbox. It was the last programming project where I could completely roll my own interface - and maybe my last really fun one.
What makes them a singular category in this regard? Genuine question. Virtually all agricultural sectors enjoy some form of subsidy, for what I think are obvious reasons. Likewise it's not like the idea of government money going to less-than-optimally-productive labor is unheard of.
Who translates product names?