skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not really. And I'm not sure the concept of virtualization makes sense when applied to hardware in the first place.

The FPGA is actually implementing the hardware. It's like using a newly manufactured edition of the original.
> Is it possible to develop a home use version?

I suspect that these things are heckin' dangerous unless they are far from humans, so that would be a challenge I think.
These sorts of Voight-Kampff tests are definitely a red flag. But like leetcode questions, they're just one more think you need to learn the correct answers to for today's interview environment.
> 1) this push is all driven by big businesses looking to just get free money for nothing, which is why I worry that the EU is so taken up with it.

Do you just assume that? Because in the article, two decidedly small businesses are mentioned as leading the charge: Tuta and Proton. Not exactly friends of big business either.
> Markets do not instantly become monopolized, but they do tend that way, and will also eagerly form cartels unless stopped by regulation.

Monopolization requires control of land or resources. This is because any cartel's attempt to set artificially high prices can be undercut by new entrants to the market who aren't in the cartel.

> On the other hand, the market for software is not very regulated, it's heavily monopolised.

Software is monopolized primarily through regulated monopolies on software (re)production i.e. copyright.
Nash's Contributions to Mathematics
I just create a new account every time I want to search for something
Sounds like he had a good contract, would be great to read more about that, hopefully more devs could include the same phrasing!
I believe there are Common Lisp implementations that will happily stack allocate dynamic extent values.
You've described a 15 year old BMW 3 Series.
Depends on the project. If its monetary, you need to approach it with a business mindset and the Domain Drive Design standard works well here (although it can be overkill at times)

For everything else I think design should drive the backend development. Annotate some figma mockups and you can build your schema off of that.
I've thought this of every personality test a job has offered. And in my experience it was never even a good job giving it - the last one I took was for a beer delivery driver 20 years ago.

The tests are usually so obvious, too. Like three awful traits and one good one. Coincidentally(or not?) I was rejected for that job for scoring too high overall - they said there's no way I'd stick around long, and they were absolutely right.
I really think in the best case, it's someone in charge of adding criteria to hiring decisions and they pick a personality test as a way to measure and fit a candidate into some box they've arbitrarily chosen for a role. In the worst case they're filtering out neurodivergent people but can't say that because it's illegal. They'll make up reasons like you're listing, but there's not much evidence to the efficacy of these test at evaluating those criteria.

Like 20 years ago, a company was taken to the cleaners because they used a test used by psychologists to evaluate mental health as a personality test in hiring. Now, people who make/use these tests are careful to only use them in ways that healthcare professionals don't. A side effect of that is that any test that would be useful for reliably measuring a candidate's personality/mental fitness would also be illegal. So a lot of these tests are bunk to begin with.
Also to note, dispite urban myths, OpenGL never mattered on game consoles, which people keep forgeting about when praising OpenGL "portability".

Then there is the whole issue of extension spaghetti, and incompatibilities across OpenGL, OpenGL ES and WebGL, hardly possible to have portable code 1:1 everywhere, beyond toy examples.
System sound properties in Windows 11 has an option "Allow apps and Windows to use this device for audio" and a button labeled "Don't allow" next to it. So what is the current state? I have no idea.
It's not FUD, it's historical fact. MS did exactly what I described, repeatedly. PG even commented about it in one of his essays years ago (his comment was that you could invest a lot in developing a third party Windows application and then find out you were just doing market research for Microsoft).
I don't think the notch is inherently dumb.

It's a great use of the space in the macOS menu bar that is otherwise usually wasted.

Moreover, having a good webcam is very important to a lot of Macbook users who would not be able to tolerate grainier cameras or the nostril-peering bottom positioning on some XPS laptops.

It is, however, super annoying that various implementation bugs have not been fixed after years.
Oh, my apologies, I didn't think of Europeans arriving much later. (And it's very unlikely that genes would go from Americas to Europe before the 20th century.)
Does anyone here use Kalman filter for pairs trading?
It was _probably_ Chengdu. That would be funny if it was on purpose!
Tesla sold 1022 vehicles in Korea in December 2023. The slowdown in January is because of uncertainty in government incentives. Nothing interesting behind this metric.
> Those who argue that the United States’ opponents won the war cite the United States’ overall objectives and outcomes. The United States entered Vietnam with the principal purpose of preventing a communist takeover of the region. In that respect, it failed: the two Vietnams were united under a communist banner in July 1976. Neighbouring Laos and Cambodia similarly fell to communists. Furthermore, domestic unrest and the financial cost of war made peace—and troop withdrawals—a necessity, not a choice.

From https://www.britannica.com/event/Vietnam-War

In fairness, it also says that some people think the US won because it won the major battles and inflicted more casualties. That sounds like winning the battle but losing the war, to me.
The title says "sold" and an order counts as a sale in my books. Is the title incorrect and should say "delivered"?
We spent the weekend here basically: https://fosdem.org/2024/schedule/room/j1106/

* Microblocks: https://microblocks.fun/

* MIT App Inventor: https://appinventor.mit.edu/

* Hedy: https://www.hedycode.com/

Hedy in particular was extremely good: it teaches kids to code in text in Python, building up from what looks like natural text into real code. The session was given by a primary school teacher (who was Dutch, which helped as my lad is Dutch/British and that's his first language).

She had excellent results with dyslexic kids, it turns out the black/white nature of code combined with the detail really helps them. Materially improves spelling.

Age? My son is 10 but there were younger kids there. My daughter is 7 and my son taught her how to use Scratch when he got home. So she's old enough. Although she is bright (skipped a year at school and the work she is doing is two years ahead of that).
Curiously, an internal refrigeration feature of sexbots has already been covered in hentai.
Canonical made me do a personality test.

From what I understand, Canonical culture isn't great, either. The whole process sounds a lot like what you are talking about -- just hoops to winnow out people for the sake of winnowing.
Yeah, it never mattered to game consoles either way.
Ah, that table is helpful, and I definitely didn't notice a link to it before. Still, without a card for the "free tier" directly on the pricing page, you get the impression there are only paid options. I wouldn't think to click that to see details about a free tier, since (to me at least) the label implicitly is saying "Compare Features (of the pricing tiers shown on this page)".

Also, on the comparison chart, you could just say something like "Cards per slide: 3 / Infinite / Infinite / Infinite" and do away with the hover text.
Rest assured that a company that'll have domestic candidates jump through ill-advised hoops subjects the off-shore ones to the same bullshit.
A curated history of UFO/UAP events on GitHub
Includes links to important FOIA responses
> through the simple act of using a phone

Not just using it, but having paid for it.
This isn't the case for me, I wonder what's different between us as I just tested:

Desktop: slashed = currently muted, plain = currently listening

Phone: slashed = currently muted, plain = currently listening.

I'm using the latest version of Teams for Windows and iPhone respectively.
Right, they ship cars to delivery centers to match current demand. Most cars do not sit in inventory very long, they are already spoken for by orders.

This is especially true in countries where the cars are delivered by container ship. You can easily make headlines about "Tesla has record sales in <month>" and "Tesla has poor sales in <month>" based on which months the ships arrive and the cars are delivered to customers.

I'm not sure what about this indicates that they don't have inventory control.
Also

(+)

And

(*)

Are well defined.
Should I be able to sue Honda because someone in their Civic ran into me?

A users misuse of a technology shouldn't be the responsibility of the developer. You could apply this to almost every product in the world otherwise.
I agree, this is tying the video game to a more recent hardware, which will also disappear in its own time. Much better to have a full software emulation that can be ported / recompiled to newer CPUs and new OS.
Whenever a website requires a boatload of personal info I just enter blank values like N/A or 0 into all fields. No-one ever complained.
Though it is annoying that I need to register at all.
I thought it would be the precedence of bitwise operators in C.
> Abortion is an action taken to prevent pregnancy

Nonsense. The literal meaning of the word "contraception" is "to prevent conception." Abortion, by definition, takes place after conception (i.e., pregnancy), and that's the whole reason anti-abortionists have concerns about it. Don't conflate the two concepts to suit your own ends.

The real reason that conservatives want to restrict access to contraception are far more sinister than this, but I won't get into that in a public forum.
Reviewing vs creating are very different mindsets. There’s a red team, blue team flavor to it.

AI levels up the less skilled, but makes even the more skilled miss embarrassing mistakes.
Won't AI companies just pack up and move?
> the worst that happens is collections

> (...) by visiting your home and stealing $20 from your wallet

You are being dishonest here.

Here's my version:

If you withhold $20 from a bill payment, the worst that can happen is having to pay an extra fee, getting a utility shut off, and a permanent hit to your credit score.

If you charge a customer an extra "service improvement fee" or "credit card surcharge" or a $400 "Mod Seq Other Qhp" (an actual line from a bill I have in front of me), they'll have to pay it.
That’s already been done with ARM.
What's the problem with this, it seems like the best idea in this bill:

> "Section 5 11547.7 is for the CalCompute public cloud computing cluster. This seems like a terrible idea, there is no reason for public involvement here, also there is no stated or allocated budget. Assuming it is small, it does not much matter."

There are many solid arguments for state funding of open-source programming efforts, the only thing to look out for is that this effort doesn't follow the University of California model of 'public private partnerships' in which taxpayer funds are used to generate IP which is then exclusively licensed to private interests.
> Requirements will always change, full stop

But that doesn't mean you have to stop what you're doing and go chase those requirements.

Why did the requirements change? Is it mandatory that the change happen right now? What research was done to support the requirements change? Was the original requirement bad in the first place? Was insufficient alignment and understanding achieved at the start of the project? Do you actually talk to the stakeholders at all, or does your PM just forward you their emails and expect you to do whatever is in there?

There's a lot of room between "design everything up-front and never change anything" and "allow requirements to change arbitrarily".
You don't think someone would welcome the option to have more hardware buying options, even if the "Itanium version" didn't happen?
Then please post some source for your historical facts.

Plus, Apple did the exact same things.
Surely this just incentivizes the existing elite who own Rembrandts to get rid of the pest and enjoy a bonus of their own valuable art becoming even more valuable...?
> I ended up choosing the job that had no whiteboard interview or personality test. It was just a simple conversation with the tech lead about my previous experience and if I had the experience to work on their current system

I miss interviews like this. We need to compile a list of companies that still do this. In fact, getting on that list could really help a company's recruiting efforts - which in turn could influence other companies to adopt this interview style.
Imagine if websites paid Apple just because they were visited with the Safari browser. That's pretty much how iPhones operate.
> Realizing the desired outcome a company may desire isn't dishonest. Being agreeable enough to play the game by the rules isn't dishonest.

Answering in a way that is not consistent with what you truly feel or believe is dishonest. I don't think it's an amoral dishonesty, as you say, you've been forced to play this dumb game. There are many cases where being untruthful is not morally wrong.

> Being honest is realizing your situation and making tradeoffs to prioritize what's important.

I wouldn't say that's 'being honest', it's being pragmatic.
I'm fine with it. It's their crappy process; if it weeds me out because it's crappy, they're the ones losing out. I'll just go get a job at a different, less crappy place.

A lot of the time stupid hiring requirements are due to the company having government (or other) contracts, and those contracts stipulating certain hiring requirements. For example, drug testing is basically mandatory if the company has government contracts.
This is not a political statement, it just teenagers doing really dumb things when having a metric-ton of fireworks is easily available and no people who will hold them accountable (self driving robots cant get mad)
Where I'm from they have some of the highest tides in the entire world and there's an area not far from here that has always been sort of a local talking candidate for such a huge project.

https://earthsciencesociety.com/2014/05/01/a-tidal-power-lag...
> the comment above calling people of a certain race "monkeys" is upvoted

If you're referring to nradov's comment, 白猴子 (lit. "white monkey") is a commonly used term in China for a token Westerner.
the actual article: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-023-01580-y
I wrote an internal Slack bot that my team uses to coordinate “deep work sessions”. It creates a thread, we say what we plan to do for the next 45-90 minutes (the time is up to the person who invokes the bot), and then we have an understanding that we will all be unreachable for that duration. When it’s over, the bot prompts everyone to say what they did. It’s simple, but I find it to be effective at squashing distractions and getting real work done.
Exactly this. I hope to have kids because I'm so grateful for all that has been given to me, and I want to share it and pass it all on.
I use a variant of the Pomodoro technique: instead of having strict breaks when the time is over, I just receive a sound notification at the end of the focus and the end of the breaks.

Then, every 10 minutes, I get a new notification.

It's a small mod but it changes a lot my perception of the technique. It creates a lot less frustration as I can finish the task I am working on without losing track of the time passing.

I coded a web version of this variant here: https://focusplus.io
You can try it, it's 100% free (still in the early days tho)
Crap, updates destroyed (my) application
Just take this bill and replace AI with “Database” and have the date be 1980.

Oracle will need KYC of customers to determine if you are good and safe enough.

And make sure there are no future competitors to themselves (and maybe their customers as well!).
vDPA: Support for block devices in Linux and QEMU
Why? How will that yield better results for the public and for other stakeholders? How is that more fair?
> A lot of people have been happy with what they have since the last century. Yet, an entire science keeps it as a fundamental.

The context here is whether they would spend more if they could, and in that context very few are happy with what they got since they eagerly work hard to get more money so they can spend more money.
I doubt it will. Infact, I would be willing to bet good money that china is going to start factory farming the next generation within the next 20 years, using artificial wombs & in vitro fertilization.
Because you aren't their property. You just invented that straw man.

And the simple act of using a phone is you making a conscious decision to agree to accept the terms and conditions that come with buying any product. You are in no way forced to and by supporting alternatives you help to change the market for everyone.
No, the solution that will be implemented is likely to be write-from-scratch.

Ultimately, you can start a new bank with new technology, move clients money to new technology, have the old bank go belly-up and bankrupt. Sometimes that happens in a new company, sometimes it happens in the same company (i.e. re-writes).

Maybe not so extreme, but I think that's likely what will happen over time. Maintaining old software is a choice, and is sometime more expensive than it's worth (depending on what that software does).

It can certainly be very painful in certain cases (the Great Depression was a similar "reset" for the financial system as a whole - though without code involved), but the market mechanism will accomplish the objective, though likely not without collateral damage.
I’ve used Tasmota with Wi-Fi and mqtt and it works great.
If it was found they were reckless, absolutely. I believe this is already the case.
>Have you encountered what’s called time-block planning or hyperscheduling?

IIRC (I read it a while ago), in his book, Rapid Development, Steve McConnell described timeboxing, which may be the same as time-block planning, which I had not heard of until now.
In ECS I had to recreate the cluster from scratch because some of the changes I wanted to do, CDK/CF wouldn't do.

My approach on Azure has been to rely as little as possible in their Infra-as-code, and do everything I can to setup the cluster using K8s native stuff. So, add-ons, RBAC, metrics, all I'd try to handle with Helm. That way if I ever need to change K8s provider, it "should" be easy.
Keep the government out of my GPU!
I'm guessing the downvotes are because almost nobody is paying this price. If someone hits you and your battery is damaged, you use the liability insurance of that someone. If you are careless yourself, you use your own collision insurance. If a natural disaster like flood damages the battery you use the comprehensive insurance. That's why people only care about the deductible and the premium of the insurance, not the full cost.

When you buy a non-electric car, do you even reasonably consider the cost of a potential replacement of the entire engine just in case it needs to be replaced? No? Then case settled. This kind of extreme cost is not at all a reasonable criterion for any normal car buyer.
Generally car sales are counted at delivery, or when the manufacturer gets paid for the car. A Tesla order is a $250 deposit. They don't get paid for the car until it gets delivered, and the order can be cancelled at any point before that.

Tesla has been fairly consistent on this and as far as I know it matches how most auto companies account for sales. The difference is that some companies count cars sold to dealerships, even if they aren't sold to an end customer yet, but Tesla does not have franchised dealerships.
We ought to go to 2003 YN107 [1], it literally arrives at Earth's doorstep every 50 years. Although it's rather tiny at 30 m. The spiral patterns really neat to look at though.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_YN107
No Strawberry Park Hot Springs nor any of the colorado ones. These should absolutely be visited:

https://strawberryhotsprings.com/
Also the heavyweights of CAD, which have definitely affected your life even if you’re not consciously aware, are Lisp based.
So the issue is so-called “economic coercion?” By the same token can’t it be argued that work is inherently coercive, and therefore a form of exploitation? For example, I’d rather not work at all but then I’d be evicted. Can we ban work since it’s non-consensual? What’s so special about sex work that it gets a carve-out?
The crime is out of control. Many people leave their cars unlocked, because it will be more expensive when thieves break their windows anyway (which happens far often than in any other city).

We also can't forget this:
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=b6fab72091...

This is all the result of left-wing politics and left-wing politicians. If we ever want to fix the problem, we need to admit the cause.
The divorce rate over time does not support this argument.

No it doesn't so much bearing. I was talking about the situation with communications in relationships in the present day, not back in the 80's.
I follow my own "Spontaneous Productivity":

https://blog.nestful.app/spontaneous-productivity/

In short: Almost nothing is scheduled. The "what do to" is decided upon at the moment of doing. Defining granular enough tasks is a valid replacement to Pomodoro.

This means a tool that always tells you "what's next" is needed, which is why I built https://Nestful.app.

Nestful is undergoing heavy refactoring this month, and while data is safe and stable, features and bugs are not. If you like the idea but find the instability troubling, send a support request mentioning this and I'll waive a couple of months of payment.
> This seems like a terrible idea, there is no reason for public involvement here, also there is no stated or allocated budget.

While I dunno where I come down yet on this legislation, it seems truly bizarre to object to the CalCompute cluster. IMO, the biggest AI threat we face is from big tech being the only ones capable of creating new models. Right now, companies like Meta are aligned with open source AI, but that could change at the drop of the hat. It makes sense to preserve state capacity to level the playing field against attempts at monopoly or other forms of overreach. Also, a lot of great work is coming out of UC system labs, so why shouldn’t we invest more in making them successful?
One also must not confuse "horde" with "hoard".
Id go with Fast API in Python over Django.
100%

I've wondered why this isn't second nature to engineers, junior or otherwise.

Maybe they don't really understand the pipeline? ("I enter the value in the web form and it just appears in the database.")
Induced demand is just unsatisfied demand from parties not counted - if there are more people/companies that want to relocate to SF but can't because of a lack of available supply, that's just as much a shortage as for people and companies which wish to remain in SF.
Except Apple did exactly what you just said Microsoft did to third party devs, and then also banned their apps off the appstore to boot because they do what their OS now does out of the box, like the famous keyboard for the Apple Watch.[1]

At least Microsoft can't ever ban you from selling Windows apps since you're not forced to use their store to sell to Windows users. Apple's grip of the iOS AppStore can be a poison pill for many devs who's livelyhood depends on Apple's automatic ML ban hammer and arbitrary rules which can change as they see fit with no warning.

https://www.verdict.co.uk/apple-watch-keyboard-app-store/?cf...