skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
SEEKING WORK | Product Designer | UX/UI Designer | Remote (Anywhere)

Are you looking for a versatile Product Designer and UX/UI Designer with over 4 years of experience designing product? I have a wealth of experience in health tech, fintech, crypto, logistics, music, and social media. From designing collaborative features for Razu Music in New York to a game changing medical imaging sharing and analysis tool with Ception Health in Lagos, I've tackled diverse design challenges with creativity and precision.

I am great at gathering insights, conducting research, and collaborating with cross-functional teams to deliver visually appealing and user-centric solutions. Let's discuss how I can improve your project.

Email: osokoyataiwo@gmail.com Portfolio: https://taiwodamilare.framer.website
Resume/CV: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1epebTmTEJwiMUryrJukQy-J_9yq...

Skills: User Research, Information Architecture, Usability Testing, Interaction Design, Visual Design, Prototyping

Tools: Figma, Adobe XD, Miro, Framer, Designmodo, Inkscape, Canva, FigJam, Jira, Protopie and so much more.

Let's bring your vision to life! Looking forward to hearing from you!
Opening another terminal is one thing this new sudo can do. It's also possible to configure it to run the sudo'd command inline in the current window (mentioned in the linked blog post); there are security tradeoffs to consider.
> While it would be nice for companies to honor such promises through mergers, it would make many toxic when the obligations of their generosity is what led to their insolvency.

Letting companies discharge debts and obligations at will, instead of through bankruptcy, has bad consequences. It means contracts with them aren't worth the paper they're printed on, if they can shed obligations when they wish (but keep what you paid them).
The article you linked answers your (presumably rhetorical?) question: no, but they probably did patent PolicyKit.
In many jurisdictions this is explicitly written into law - a threshold past which assumption of distribution is automatic.
> Why are outdoor hot tubs full in the first place when it's -10°C (15°F) outside?

Why wouldn't they be? Those are really normal temperatures to use a hot tub in.
Ollama is just easier to use and serve the model on a local http server. I personally use it for testing stuff with llama-index as well. Pretty useful to say the least with zero configuration issues.
Glib phrasing halts thinking.
I've switched back and fourth multiple times. After about 10 years on Android I recently switched back to iPhone for one feature and one feature only - its integrations with hearing aids. In every other way I can think of, I find Android so much better. I remember having the same reaction when I switched 10 years ago too.

Well, I switched for another reason - I've had three Pixel phones, and all three phones had hardware failures in less than 2 years, so there is that.
It’s basically what Apple did when moving from OS 9 to OS X. Old applications would load up in Classic, allowing users to start using the new system, while developers had time to update their apps.
Books and chess amuse.

Gardening makes the world a more beautiful place. You're right that in the long term, it doesn't matter, but when you walk outside and smell a gardenia...
> Is this to say that you are able and willing to consider all sound arguments, without bias?

Of course not, how could I possibly do that? I'm a human being, my life experience up to this point is my bias. Same goes for you.
It’s not administrative, but legislative.

ATF is empowered to interpret these laws. The law is quite clear that a howitzer is regulated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destructive_device
That's a rather fun hack for issue numbers. Of course, a more robust strategy would be to have a specialised short-link generator for special issues!
The original Homeworld still feels fresh and unique 25 years on
No, Chevron deference breeds sanity. it would be insane to think that every little detail of complex regulatory structure must be outlined specifically in legislation in order for it to be valid. For example, legislation gives the EPA the power to regulate waterways. Chevron deference allows the EPA to use its expertise to write rules that say you can't dump benzine into the river. Without Chevron deference, someone who wants to dump benzine in the river could challenge the EPA saying that the law doesn't specifically say you can't dump benzine in the river. Imagine relying on our elected officials to come up with a list of what is and isn't considered toxic.
It should say "buy time-limited license"
Baker was not CEO during that graph (well, she became interim in December 2019). She was chairperson of the board.

Mozilla’s CEO for its decline (setting aside Eich’s brief stint) was Gary Kovacs and Chris Beard.
Anki needs a better answer for skipping a card than "bury".

There are times when you can't recall a card. But you can't move on to the next one until you answer it. You take a break for five minutes and, poof, you remember the card! In that five minutes, you could have reviewed more cards.

If you bury it the card, you won't see it until the next day; it doesn't play well into this situation.

Anki should let you review all the cards that are currently due in any order; i.e. move back and forth among them and answer them in any order you see fit.
It's interesting that retailers would appear to allow this. If I were the retailer, I would require an agreement on who was allowed to run ads in my store, and get a cut of it. You're already on a very thin margin as a supermarket retailer. Why risk a "bad" advertisement, and then not get paid for it?
Yeah LLMs are not consistent.
Right to counsel is pretty universal. The main difference between adversarial (US) and inquisitorial systems is that in the latter, the judge is not limited to evidence that either side introduces, but can initiate their own investigation to the extent necessary to determine the truth. This makes it much harder for prosecution to pull tricks such as concealing relevant evidence or cherry-picking experts. It also means that even if the defendant doesn't have a good lawyer, the judge can effectively compensate for that.
They need to declare that the license is not active in perpetuity.
i have to be honest: as a lover of the language, and with due respect to the author, i’m really tired of these “why i picked elixir” takes extolling the same virtues (or some subset thereof) we’ve seen written up in darn near every introductory article on elixir for the last five or six years.

it’s not that i think they’re wrong, at all. it’s just that they add nothing new to the conversation, they’re superficial, and frequently don’t go on to give a reader any idea of how the decision worked out.

here, i’ll start: i rewrote my startups platform in elixir about six years ago and it was a terrible business decision. not because elixir was bad —to the contrary, it was fantastic —but because the year and a half i spent reproducing functionality could have been spent adding new features that would have translated to new customers, and that would have translated to an additional million dollars when we eventually sold our bootstrapped business (obviously if i’m quibbling about a million bucks im not talking about a venture backed business here.)

in terms of scratching my intellectual itch it was great, but i can’t defend it from a business perspective and whenever somebody brings up the notion of rewriting a core platform i tell this story.

now can someone please write some elixir articles about cool stuff they did with it and get those on the front page?
and what does `auto` even mean?
His writings in "The AutoDesk File" are incredible and had a huge impact on the rise of the PC and the PC era overall. I shared some thoughts here https://x.com/stevesi/status/1755737707857555775.
No heating and no hot showers or hot running water.
The way I parsed that sentence, I came up with 5.
For what it's worth, I was once a serious meat-eater and couldn't imagine life without it. In a way it was part of my identity. I was the one people wanted to cook meats for holidays, I liked curing meats and making sausages for charcuteries, always smoking things, making elaborate broths and other animal-based preparations, fishing, hunting. Now I couldn't care much less. Something I was certain was true turned out to be patently false, and being on the other side now it's hard to imagine having the same belief again.

I'm not trying to overtly convince or coerce you here. I wish I'd more seriously considered the possibility of changing sooner, though. I suppose I maintained my status quo a little lazily for quite a long time despite caring about the possibility of change.

Having said that, the change you've already made makes an enormous difference in the scheme of things. Christ, I remember having meals where I would eat almost exclusively meat. Like an entire chicken after lifting weights or running particularly far. Totally excessive and bizarre in retrospect. Anyone eating moderately as you described has already shifted towards something resembling sustainability; it isn't really a problem in the scheme of things.
+ Baby first.

Mama second.

You 3+n where
n=dogs in family.

+ You don’t get it back.
It is life.

+ It will take a lot of work
To actually screw up.

+ In the next few decades
You will grow too.
Hopefully as much
as your child.
It would be a shame
Not to.

+ Do it right and they will
Become a busy adult
And you will miss
Them like hell.

+ Talk to your child
As a person from day one.

Congratulations and good luck.
This introduction must assume that the reader already understands physics deeply, right? For instance, the page on Hamiltonian mechanics stated that force is the derivative of momentum with respect to time. I can't imagine how one will understand the intuition behind the definition without having already learned at least college-level physics.
Do you have experience with Ruby on Rails?

I've built apps both with Elixir/Phoenix and with Rails. Yes, the Elixir/Phoenix stack is amazing and is definitely superior over Rails in several ways; however, with regards to Bootstrapping and releasing a real-world app/business (web based), Rails is still the king.
Quite a blend really, just right now. UCSD PASCAL (would you believe?), pdp8 assembly**, and pdp8 OS8.

Then snippets of C, Z80 assembly, and GTK+.

Ask me again in a few weeks and very likely none of the above will be included.

** I like to read manufacturers' manuals as 'bedtime' reading. Yep, I'm weird!
"For better or worse, in sickness or in health, unless you turn out to be a total bitch."
This isn’t embarrassing. Apple is supporting their “older way” of doing things for longer than anyone else.

The fact that they let you do via cable so many things that their competitors have deprecated entirely or moved to cloud is commendable. These apps all still support iPods as well.

Tell me how to buy an album from Google and have it automatically sync to your iPhone when it’s plugged in to the computer. No cloud.

Tell me how to make a backup image of your Android phone without touching a Google account. Apple’s sync app can do it for you. Let me guess, you have to use a developer tool that wasn’t intended for the consumer?

Not sure what the hell you're talking about regarding Apple TV.
I’m in bed hearing rain drops on the roof, watching lightning flash across the sky and listening to the rumble of a planet whispering sweet nothings in the vast nowhere.
For me the validation process is to use it for a few weeks and then I have a good handle on what it can handle and what it can’t.
The problem with app stores is that they sell the idea of verifying trustworthiness when the really can't. The biggest effect they can have is by doing identity verification and they make the same mistake that EV TLS certificates, etc. did. That mistake is assuming business names and trademarks are unique. They're not.

The entire software distribution industry could use a mulligan. I think it should start by using domains as identity because it's the only namespace we have with global buy-in and anyone can register / reserve a unique identifier (aka domain) in that system.

If the supply chain for that app went back to 'lastpass.com', and that information was prominently displayed, it solves a lot of problems in terms of educating users to help them avoid scams.
It doesn't matter where the egg came from, just that it is an egg.

It could have luckily coalesced from gas (a Boltzmann egg), or perhaps even more radically, been laid by a duck.

you say

>They didn't train their system by self-play and they certainly didn't hire an army of low-paid workers to annotate moves for them.

So you are certainly aware that there are avenues to creating the data set. Given that, it is quite reasonable to say that search is unnecessary.
We use langchain and don't regret it at all. As a matter of fact, it is likely that without lc we would've failed to deliver our product.

The main reason is langsmith. (But there are other reasons too). Because of langchain we got "free" (as in no development necessary) langsmith integration and now I can debug my llm.

Before that it was trying to make sense of whats happening inside my app within hundreds and hundreds of lines of text which was extremely painful and time consuming.

Also, lc people are extremely nice and very open/quick to feedback.

The abstractions are too verbose, and make it difficult, but the value we've been getting from lc as a whole cannot be overstated.

other benefits:

* easy integrations with vector stores (we tried several until landing on one but switching was easy)

* easily adopting features like chat history, that would've taken us ages to determine correctly on our own

people that complain and say "just call your llm directly": If your usecase is that simple, of course. using lc for that usecase is also almost equally simple.

But if you have more complex use cases, lc provides some verbose abstractions, but it's very likely that you would've done the same.
Chevron Reference is the idea that when a statute is ambiguous the agencies can interpret it according to their expert opinion.

The alternative is requiring Congress to write every single rule explicitly and pass a law adapting to any change in circumstance or technology. In practice this means "no regulation" because Congress is pretty slow and adding more detail would only make them slower.
This reminds me of (IIRC) Alianz Life, which decades ago issued a single policy that will over time bleed the company dry.

I think some European court denied their request to weasel out of it.
Can you picture other things?

A long time ago I read that if you are awakened and want to fall back asleep, you should picture yourself turning around, going through a door to your basement stairway and descending the steps towards the dark basement.

I tried forever to do this and couldn't, and thought it was something about this scenario specifically. But then years later, I learned about aphantasia and realized I can't actually picture anything at all. The doorway wasn't special.
No you can derive that they find those politicians better than the alternative and nothing more. Republicans not cutting spending as voters would like isn’t going to make them democrats no matter how much you’d like that to be the case.

The fact is they have been very successful at stopping democratic policy over the years and just this year they have forced concessions on spending out of democrats, including the president after he stated that wouldn’t happen.
Executive agencies are granted authority by the legislature. The legislature can at any time make additional legislation overriding or limiting specific actions taken by executive agencies. It isn't made up.
It's a short exerpt from this link, which probably should be the OP:

https://geoffboeing.com/2019/09/urban-street-network-orienta...
TOTP 2FA is terrible for this. I’ll sign into a website, pick my phone up to read the TOTP code, and instead end up on HN or Signal or something. Put the phone down after a couple of minutes, look back up to my computer screen with the 2FA prompt and go “oh yeah, that’s why I looked at my phone”

That happens probably 50% of the time. And I wish that was an exaggeration.
You are either sorely misinformed or highly inept on the subject.

[edit] to provide clarity. Holding assets in trusts or LLCs has nothing to do with doing anything illegal, and you will find politicians, people working in 3 letter agencies etc all do the same, we all pay taxes just like you. So attempting to leaving a comment with a critical view particularly in contexts where it might be seen as unfair, unjust, or disproportionately benefiting the already wealthy at the expense of others just shows a lack of understanding of the subject. Even though my initial comment has nothing to do with taxes I will leave you with this.

"Anyone may arrange his affairs so that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which best pays the treasury. There is not even a patriotic duty to increase one's taxes. Over and over again the Courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everyone does it, rich and poor alike and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands."

This quote captures the essence of tax planning and the legal right of individuals and businesses to minimize their tax liabilities within the bounds of the law. - Judge Learned Hand
But how does it work? Am I obliged to open an email from a person that paid?

If not - why would advertisers pay for that? If yes, that feels like a job and not like my personal email account - I wouldn’t want that.
Both of them have those features, but the key problem is about UI/UX. Clearly, Mozilla doesn't devote as many resources to improving UI/UX as Google does.

Multiple profiles' UX is not user-friendly at all. You need to either type "about:profiles" in the address bar or start the desired profile from the command line.

The history/bookmark manager UI is 2000-ish and does not align with current mobile-like design trends.
I have a better suggestion - every phone call will involve a microtransaction (e.g. $0.01) from the caller to the recipient, even if not picked up. I want to see anyone make robocalls then.
The stated argument for evacuating the town was that due to ongoing seismic shifts. New fissures were opening regularly, and that these presented an unacceptable danger to public safety.

I'm pointing out that it's at best a very convenient omission that the evacuation wasn't happening due to that scenario.

Nobody randomly fell into a fissure by accident. That person and others were being directed to work adjacent to and in these fissures.

It's an on-the-clock workplace accident due to grossly inadequate safety practices.

We're not talking about some obscure inconsequential OSHA rule here. A lot of things have to go systemically wrong to have someone working alone at an unsecured edge without a teather.
Somebody never read Cyrano de Bergerac...
Not on the ski slopes themselves of course, but is there anything stopping a determined person from slogging their way up through the woods?
I think this paper, more or less on this issue, is pretty worthwhile.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2321480
By which point, of course, your TOTP token has expired. I feel your pain :)
same, but now a lot of callers whom i would like to speak with -- e.g. my insurance company -- just hang up before greeting me (because they think my phone's broken?). but then if i screen everyone via voicemail instead, a different (but overlapping) portion of callers refuse to leave messages. it's like everyone's given up on using the POTS outside of their immediate social circle, and the few people/businesses who still do are either malicious, or are just going through the motions.

thanks spammers. and thanks FCC for sitting idly over the decades and letting the spammers ruin it. weird time to finally put your foot down, but sure, okay.
> You and I know, but the great majority of the people in the world do not.

Relevance? When there is already an app called LastPass published by LogMeIn with millions of downloads, clearly you don't approve an app called LastPass published by a "Parvati Patel"
I was eager to work on this because at some level you will definitely be able to apply Reinforcement Learning but I was worried that OpenAI would definitely jump into this.

And it seems that they are focussing on tasks :

https://www.theinformation.com/articles/openai-shifts-ai-bat...
First time was Butterfinger candy. There was a promotion in FF14 where if you bought a certain dollar value of Butterfingers and sent in a picture of the receipt they'd send you a code for a mount.

I bought it expecting to not be able to eat it, just because I wanted the mount. But then I kept seeing the bag on my table and really wanted to eat it anyway. It was full of individually-wrapped pieces, so I took a bunch of still-wrapped candy, a hammer, and a bowl to the landing at the top of my stairs. I laid down on my staircase and went to town on the candy with the hammer. Once it had been thoroughly pulverized, I opened up the wrappers, poured the dust into the bowl, and then just lapped it up out of the bowl.

I specifically did it on the landing and not while sitting at a table or something because I have terrible hand-eye coordination (go go developmental dyspraxia) and the hammer hit the floor more than it hit the candy. If I'd done that at a table, I'd have destroyed the table. And laying on the stairs gave me a better angle to hit it than if I'd just been sitting on the floor.

The next time was cashews. I tried eating them whole but it was too hard, so I got out the hammer and went to my staircase again. Since they weren't individually wrapped I had to get creative. I wrapped them up in a paper towel as best as I could and put it on a paper plate before going to town with the hammer.

With that said, it's been a couple of years since then and it wasn't until much later that I realized my jaw was still healing back then and wasn't at 100% (this was about half a year after my extractions). I could probably eat cashews without the hammer now, though I haven't tried. I still won't touch harder nuts such as almonds, even with a hammer, but it's not a big deal because my teeth were in such terrible shape for years before my extractions that I hadn't been able to eat almonds for a very, very long time.
Also digital items need minimum supported years advertised. If I buy a download I should be told up front for how long at minimum it’ll be valid. Same with streaming.

Another solution is to allow a drm free download if the service goes down. This likely won’t fly with rights holders but something has to change.
I know you were joking - but here is one of many real examples [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abboud_and_Khajawa].

There are pointers to a lot of additional documentation in here too [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_cannibalism#CITEREFKin...], including from the Holodomir.

You’re ‘welcome’.
Haha yeah, that’s the most annoying part of it.
Sad that it's Windows 11 only. I can't upgrade. I have a normal, recent PC that I dual boot with Linux, and Microsoft wants me to keep Windows 10 in that constellation. Upgrading is prevented by a silly if statement, and there's nothing I can do. It's the first time a software vendor actively doesn't want me to to have their latest software, but it is what it is.
Our country is falling apart because of the current level of congressional ineptitude. One party refuses to support important legislation they specifically asked for because it may give the opposition party a positive news article.

Wishing the Congress had to study and pass legislation for all enforcement and regulation of society is tantamount to accelerationism.