skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The context here is the "starting with" situation. It's much easier to do that with PHP since you normally don't have to care about versions there - barely anything requires version higher than in LTS. On the other side it doesn't matter what is clearly documented, or which registry is up to date - a person looking at this for the first time is either going to have an easier life or not. Nextjs effectively has extra steps you need to know about and follow.
abs() of this value also happens to exceed the maximum positive value. Which means that in C, a simple negation can cause signed integer overflow -(-32768), and therefore UB.
I'd say the most important thing would be deciding if you want to fully outsource implementation, or if you want to 'ramp up' your coding to do it yourself. Starting a biz is stressful enough that you might not actually want to be responsible for implementation along with sales, customer support, accounting, etc.

For the MVP I'd recommend building on a tech stack you know/want to learn, or can hire consultants for easily (hopefully without breaking the bank!). Once you've identified the stack, I'd look for someone that not only has a solid background in the stack, but can also document/explain the application, provide mentoring (if needed), etc. Definitely someone that will be around to update/modify the MVP based on customer feedback or at the very least able to help architect/vet any changes you make yourself.

Depending on whether you're building a SaaS style app, or something installed locally by each client, you will have other questions to answer regarding hosting, support, software upgrades, etc.

In short, implementation is often the 'easiest' part of the job. Knowing what you want to build, and how you want to build it can be the real problem :-P
Wages are less as is the cost of living. Everything is relative.
A bunch of the collabs have been super successful. They don’t need to build a permanent Second Life type metaverse BS. Look at their concerts in Fortnite’s universe. Very successful at attracting eyes and money.

“Virtual Disney world” doesn’t mean VR roller coasters, it means Disney themed digital experiences (eg fun games). Disney and Epic have a decent track record building fun and profitable experiences for people.
Think the point was there are a lot of things that at some point we 'didn't understand' . But we keep chipping away at it. And eventually we do understand.

We were able to build steam engines before understanding Entropy, and Entropy is super complex.
Do you mean Betamax timeshifting? Sony didn't own a movie studio at that point. The entire reason they bought one was to prevent that sort of issue from ever happening again. Tail ended up wagging the dog, though.
BTW revision:2 also said much. For real commercial chip it is fortune to see revision 5, but usual for market something more than 10.

This is because chip manufacture is iterative process, you spent at least 3 revisions to achieve predictable yield percentage, and then each revision will make yield percentage better and better economy.
The Indieweb called "sidefiles" an antipattern, mostly because a strong allergy to DRY. I find it a little bit overblown and sometimes suspect it is a result of Tantek Çelik’s CMS.

https://indieweb.org/sidefile-antipattern

But of course there were ideas to embed the feed data structure directly in HTML as attributes.

In the indieweb/microformats corner there is h-feed which could simply be extended with rel=enclosure links for an embedded podcast feed.

https://indieweb.org/h-feed

And more formal side you could use RFDa/Microdata and the schema.org vocabulary to annotate the HTML with the logical properties of a feed and podcast episodes:

https://schema.org/PodcastEpisode

Of course there aren’t any podcatchers with understand these vocabularies.

...

I’m a little bit torn. I love good minimal markup and have a soft spot for the idea of RDFa. An early 2000s idealist. But the real world is different.

Netscape’s original RSS came out of a clear need: the markup for table layout of the late 90s was shit and not generally parsable. Which is the same thing today: Today’s markup a wastelands of nested divs which are not generally parsable and often generated by tools nobody really has control over. Just today I had to wade through a Wordpress site builder plugin and its crappy visually generated HTML. That’s the majority of the web, sadly.
> Performance is not the primary reason to use Rust. It has way more to offer than performance.

So much this. I've been doing mostly Scala (and some Haskell) for the last 10 years, and now I'm really enjoying Rust precisely because of its language features. Performance is just a (really) nice bonus.

Other bonuses include simple deployments (single binaries versus massive JVM and fat jars), low memory footprint, simple builds that just work (Cargo is an absolute joy), great concurrency, great ecosystem, etc. etc.
Pypy gives you at best a single-digit speedup, and requires carefully going through your dependencies and checking all your codepaths. That's rarely a good value proposition for a business - if you're growing fast enough that performance is an issue, you're going to need a bigger speedup than that pretty soon, and if you're taking the time to go through all your codepaths, it doesn't cost a lot more to make a bigger change like switching languages entirely.
I don't think 华 is necessarily the same as ethnicity as it's interchangeable with the concept of "China" itself. 中華民國 translates into Republic of China the official country's name, of which Taiwan is mere province of. It's the same "hua". I think most Chinese historians recognize that China as a concept has often been "split" in the past, with different governments each stating their legitimacy. It happened e.g. during the Three Kingdoms period, the North and Southern dynasties period. It happened during the Song dynasty, etc., etc. It's happened an awful lot for long periods of time. To Westerners the Taiwan and China situation seems a bit odd, but not really in the context of Chinese history and the Chinese mindset. Regardless each government still saw themselves as the "legit" Chinese government with all that entails, e.g. mandate of heaven, etc..

If we are talking about ethnicity I believe that the large majority would say they are 漢人, which is more equivalent of an America saying he's Irish, Italian, etc. Huaren is more equivalent to saying you're Chinese, culturally, ethnically, etc... 华裔 is basically saying you have Chinese blood, which may be also different conceptionally.

中国人 used to not have such a huge political connotation to mean only PRC people but was more interchangeable with 中华, 华人, etc., but that's now not the case, and the polls reflect that change in mindset.
"Don't get Clippy with me, Rover," said Bob.
Oversimplified positivity doesn't capture their perverse intentions. A more nuanced view of both negatives and positives is advisable.
Some people set up something like a Google Search Alert for terms about them or their writings, etc.

Also, a lot of subject matter experts hang out here so it just happens a lot :)
The context is about the initial setup and the parent comment recommended vercel git flow. Yes, you can run it locally, but that's back to the "getting started" issues: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39286669
> Governments are increasingly considering integrating autonomous AI agents in high-stakes military and foreign-policy decision-making, especially with the emergence of advanced generative AI models like GPT-4.

They are? I mean, Jesus, haven't we all seen WarGames and Terminator?
In present day reality though, most people live in cities in cheap apartments that won't have chargers for at least a decade. I watch woodpeckers destroy the wood trim at my building, you think mgmt is going to add EV chargers any time soon? Hybrids have superior reliability and lower cost of ownership than pure gas which is why uber drivers and nyc tax have adopted then en masse. All of the disadvantages of hybrids are theoretical or from some lofty "elegance" perspective when in the real world, hybrids work brilliantly. Toyota has been ruthlessly pragmatic with their cars and that's why they've worked. It's admirable how much they've avoided the EV fad and stuck to practical vehicles. It'll be at least a decade until they're on par with hybrids.
That's probably the first thing i've heard about Epic Games that makes me think it'll still be around 5-10 years from now.

Disney can bring a LOT of content, so long as they can actually make it half decent content and not shit the bed like they did with EA.
Bear in mind at least one of those notes the code wasn’t optimised for ARM while all the meaningful HPC code in existence has been painstakingly optimised for Intel for decades.
I guess compared to other competing family EV-SUVs in the segment it's not too expensive. Come to think of it, there isn't any. The Rivian R1S comes close, but way more expensive and isn't really a family SUV. The EX90 is also more expensive and according to some it isn't even nearly premium.
Presumably a derogatory way of describing a permissive license, rather than a copyleft one.

It's a religious disagreement.
IIRC the banks in the US had to be forced (by law) to make the funds available in 24 hours. That doesn't mesh with what you have said at all.

[edit]

Also, the banks really would rather not be loaning their customers money interest-free (which is what happens when they make funds available prior to fraud checks finishing). I think you have the incentives completely wrong.
Hyundai did skimp out on standard anti-theft mechanisms which led to a significant number of car jackings upon discovery and viral share via TikTok.

https://www.forbes.com/wheels/news/kia-hyundai-car-thefts-se...

Every manufacturer has got a story at this point.
That is tautologically true, considering how Neanderthal is an offshoot of Sapiens.

The question maybe worth asking is just how far they split off, compared to how far we are split off today (or maybe in the pre-modern era, I would expect us to be merging fast since then).
social media posting dynamics:

* micro-dopamine hits from likes are the primary motivator

* attention spans are wildly overtaxed

* goal: maximize likes and minimize effort

* maximize likes: focus on people on your team, ignore everyone else

* minimize effort: use terse sloganized shibboleths, similar to sports and marketing. "let's go cowboys"

* fin
That corresponds to the publication, https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6...
"A cancer signal was detected in 92 (1·4%) of 6621 participants with analysable results. 35 (38%) participants were diagnosed with cancer (true positives) and 57 (62%) had no cancer diagnosis (false positives)."

I am surprised that they were approved based on their study results, it will be interesting to see the results from PATHFINDER 2, which is running now.
What was bad about IE, more than anything else, was how tightly integrated to the OS it was. Running windows 2000? You can only run IE6. Running windows XP? IE8 is your limit.

This was particularly problematic because MS struggled MIGHTILY to get Vista out the door. It was a decade of really terrible IE which was pushed out longer due to Vista's poor performance and stability.

Meanwhile, you could install firefox and later chrome and get a relatively modern internet browsing experience.

Ironically, I think the thing that hurt firefox adoption was the switch to the evergreen model. The era of firefox 3->~33 was quiet painful, updating was simply far too intrusive. "You are out of date, click here to download the latest version!". Chrome from the get go was pretty good at making that seamless.
> The onus is already on individuals to find fraudulent transactions and report them. If my CC gets a fraudulent charge and I don't see it, and it doesn't trigger the bank's anti-fraud logic, it will just get paid.

Right, but if I find it 60 days later when I balance my registry, then the CC company refunds me the money.
Playing sides for the small guy is fair.
I mean that's just pseudocode to illustrate my point. You'd certainly want a more structured way to express specified vs actual value, not just similarly named fields

This is also not a new idea, though I can't recall if there's a name for it. Kubernetes leans heavily on this pattern, for example
Assuming that you calculated that by subtracting 4 from 10, then divided the results by 10, and expressed that as a percentage, then yes, your arithmetic is correct.

It's just not the right arithmetic for computing the false positive rate. :-)

What you computed is the false discovery rate.

Let

FP = number of false positives
TP = number of true positives
FN = number of false negative
TN = number of true negative

What you computed is FP/(FP+TP). The false positive rate is FP/(FP + TN). To compute that we need to know TN.

Example. Suppose 1000 people were screened, with 985 true negatives, 5 false negatives and 10 positives, and of those 10 positives only 4 were true positives. Then the false positive rate would be 6/(6+985) = 0.605%.

That names for some of the various things you can compute from FP, TP, FN, and TN are given here [1].

With medical screening you are often have the case that only a small fraction of the people being screened have the condition. Even if a test is wrong only a small fraction of the time, (large fraction of people without the condition) x (small chance of them getting a false positive) can easily be as big as (small fraction of people with the condition) x (large chance of getting a true positive).

Continuing with the example from above, what screening does is take you from "We've got 1000 people and probably around 10 have the condition" to "here's 10 people and probably around 4 have the condition". You can then use more expensive tests that wouldn't be feasible to do on 1000 people on those 10 to find the ones who really have it.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confusion_matrix
Recent Preview Deployments now displayed in the dashboard
Preface: I am not familiar with Tesla, they tend to do their own thing.

When my early-2000’s Prius battery died Toyota only offered a full swap out for $insane. However there were 4 different shops within cheap/free towing distance that would swap out individual failed battery cells for around 1k with a multi-year warranty. It is my understanding that most EV batteries are in the same boat. So, like many stories, I would not count this post against all EVs, just against stupid Teslas.
> next AI unicorn

I see what you did there...
Definitely lower cost per mile due to the fuel economy. Clearly they make a ton of sense for taxis. Do you have evidence for the higher reliability than pure ICE cars? I hadn't heard that, and it seems counter-intuitive to me. I certainly know anecdotally I've heard many claims of Prius hybrid batteries failing. (Which isn't necessarily a huge problem, but just saying it adds a point of failure without, as far as I can tell, removing any.)
Once you understand the embryology, there are actually a variety of things like the appendix: they're just the ends of things that come together. The uvula is a great example: embryologically, the two sides of the face separate very early as an opening, then develop a lot of complicated anatomy and fuse back together. The uvula is where that fusion completes and the fusion process completes (returns 0) when the microenvironment variables get to a certain state.

The vermiform appendix is where the three tiniae coli come together. Unsurprisingly, the other, rectal, end the tiniea coli don't so much end as they spread out into the longitudinal muscular layer of the rectosigmoid.

And of course the wall of the vermiform appendix is full of lymphoid tissue. The whole colonic wall is full of lymphoid tissue!

Source: I'm a pathologist. I have looked at way too much colon. And uvula, and pretty much every other bit of tissue you can imagine, under gross exam, under a microscope, and in situ (live in ORs and dead in autopsy suites).

This idea that the vermiform appendix is some deep evolutionary mystery is sort of a low point of medicine that occasionally pokes its head up. It ranks up there with male pregnancy, and various birth defects that have given rise to stories of monsters, like Cyclops. Fun stories, completely useless. Please don't invest in anything related to any of those. If you have money burning a hole in your biomedical investment pocket, feel free to reach out.
As someone else already mentioned, Unreal isn’t the Epic or Steam platform. SteamVR != Source engine

> Virtual worlds don't need to be VR

Yes, but flat pancake games are even poorer at simulating a Disney theme park IRL than VR. It doesn’t even come close to a substitute, especially for the rides.
I would not want mini-splits in a house in the north east. it gets cold and you need to heat evenly. Plus you'd need them in every room incl. bathrooms so the pipework would be nuts!

Mini-splits are not uncommon for cooling in the summer, but then again you only need them in the main living areas and bedrooms.
i specifically wrote "tesla"
I started trying meditation ten years ago, and initially, it was going well. However, after I developed anxiety, the imagery in meditation often triggered a sense of panic in me. Does anyone know about the relationship between long-term meditation and depersonalization? There are some papers discussing this topic.
>If he were right, then reacting hydrogen with oxygen may produce heat and water; alternatively it may produce a chocolate cake with orange candles and a golf ball in the middle. Because the laws of science would exist only in our minds and wouldn't be about reality, we'd have no way of knowing: one prediction would be as rational, or irrational, as the other.

Everything we know is through the observation and mental formulation of our mind. This is just an unavoidable fact.
We make proofs of physical phenomena entirely through observation with our sensory receptors. Whatever scientific experiment you have, whether its watching a plant grow in a certain way or particle collision in the Hydron collider, is through the beliefs of an observer.

The question in my view, is how universal these mental conceptions are. After all, we all similarly agree on some basic observations. There is a ball here. The ball blew up, this detector turned on and off at these times, etc.

If however, there were hypothetically some other observer that did not agree with you on these basic beliefs, such that they said that the detector turned on at time 2 and not 1, then what is the reality? What method do you have to confirm what is reality when two observers disagree on what was observed?

It is easy to throw this thought to the wind and say, there can be other perception of reality possible, but that to me seems faith, not logic.
Makes sense. So yeah, not something the end user would really have to worry about then.
Current PC desktops have two memory channels and often four slots, because each channel has two slots. You get more bandwidth if you populate both channels, but four isn't better than two. If you wanted four channels the CPU socket would need more pins, because right now the second and third slots use the same pins as the first and second.

What you could do is put some fast/wide DRAM on the CPU package. Then you could still upgrade the fast memory by upgrading the CPU, and the pins don't have to go through the socket. This should also be compatible with existing CPU sockets, and not incompatible with also having ordinary DDR in the existing memory slots. You basically get an L4 cache made out of HBM, which is available to the iGPU.
I distinctly remember at the time that Google even had a browser extension that loaded chromium inside the IE6 viewport...

Shady browser advertising toolbar companies were using that extension to hijack and silently upgrade users into Chrome. Google bought that company as well.
Do you have data for every allowable and disallowable practice in the legal code?

No one is going to concede that procedure, nor anything else in the legal system, requires data to justify itself. Law is a practice.

But if pressed, as many consultants that any municiplaity could afford to hire could go out and cobble together single subject interviews that would stand as "data" or rather what you meant to say: "evidence". All of which would speak highly of the utility of lying (and if the off chance that one or two didn't, those interviews would be excluded as is de facto practice in modern scientific "data collection" whenever politics are involved. The same holds for the inverse interests).
iTunes/iPod for a time was advertised with the slogan "Rip. Mix. Burn."
A licence which grants you rights to the software, but allows you to strip them away in derivative works. This is in contrast to (for example) copyleft, which requires you to share with your users the same code and rights that you got to use, when distributing derivative works.
Yes. Appendicitis can go away on its own, and it can also be treated with antibiotics.

Doctors prefer surgery because it's a definite cure, without negative effects of a long antibiotic course.
The invention of Google images and Jennifer Lopez[image]
Dupe of the same post by the same author yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39282349

I'm glad this one is getting more traction. Can we merge the posts, though?
For me it was their billions of dollars of revenue
This link has nothing about speech.
(sorry dexwiz, I replied to the wrong parent... meant to reply to my own topic instead, oops)
"....after the left mid exit door (MED) plug departed the airplane leading to a rapid decompression"

Lol, they said the door plug "departed" instead of "blew the f** off"
Florida recently passed HB 269 in which acts that are generally uncontroversially categorized as speech were criminalized. There are also anti-BDS laws, etc.
"....after the left mid exit door (MED) plug departed the airplane leading to a rapid decompression"

Lol, they said the door plug "departed" instead of "blew the f* off"
People who have $1500+ to spend on laptops forget that the vast majority of people don't spend (and can't spend) that much on a laptop. So much of the market is in that $500-$600 price range. You wouldn't be wrong to point out that an M1 or M2 Macbook is a far superior device, but it really doesn't matter.

And in terms of specs, Apple is still not an incredible value for the money. The laptop I'm using now is a last-years model Thinkpad. I bought it refurbished, with a two year warranty included, for $250. It's got a 12 core (edit: 6 core, 12 threads) Ryzen 5000 series, and for less than $150 I've added 32 GB of RAM (total RAM 40 GB), and a 1 TB NVMe disk (the computer has slots for two). That's an absolutely crazy deal for $400, and the build quality on these Thinkpads is miles above cheap Dell Inspirons or whatever.

For most people, this is a much more reasonable choice than spending $1500 on a laptop. My last laptop (Dell XPS) lasted over 12 years; I think the "laptop dies in two years" stories are the exception, not the rule, and Apple's laptops are certainly not lemon-proof, in that regard.
> But let's be clear, between 1998 and 2003, IE was at the forefront. Its CSS support wasn't broken. It was the best and only. Its box model wasn't broken. There were no other box models to compare it to. You didn't need to give it separate CSS, because it was the only one around really to parse it. It didn't have non-standard AJAX support. It WAS the standard since no XMLHttpRequest object existed at the time.

They should have done what Chrome does - write the standards to match what you've implemented.