skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Video is over a year old.

Their website is offline https://www.z-anatomy.com/

https://web.archive.org/web/20230601122004/https://www.z-ana... is the newest crawl of it but it doesn't have the zip file

That's here https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/18M7IuH2ai2fl21Ud0YH1... found via https://github.com/LluisV/Z-Anatomy

I messaged the company's linked in page to let them know https://www.linkedin.com/company/z-anatomy/

And messaged their facebook page https://www.facebook.com/GauthierKERYN/
Adding HDL into Vivado IP Integrator Cleanly
One downside to pirated content is: 99% of the time it only has English audio track and the majority of the world's population does not have English as their native language. I have small children and they don't understand one word of English, and even if they did, I want them to hear their native language on tv, not English.
I'm counting down the days like it's Christmas.
The questionnaire is for a little research for a project I want to work on, and I'm looking to find out how people currently do certain things in their development workflow that will help decide the initial features for the project I'm working on. I'll also be publishing the results later next week.

The questionnaire is for research for a project we're working on, and I'm looking to find out what the main painpoints are that people encounter when it comes to creating and deploying a backend.

The answers will help us to better orientate our product, which is and always will be open source. I'll also be publishing the results at the end of February.
Big plus is, it also gives yo the option to export the tables to pdf and other file formats.
I don't have a PhD in biology (or in anything), but isn't temperature a single number "explaining" a gazillion interactions we will never "understand"?
tmux popups are not first class citizens (eg. at least in current versions they freeze the display behind them, opening a terminal inside one of them is a pain as well as opening multiple ones, not to mention resizing them or rearranging them intelligently)
You see it as "7%" but for Apple it is "a large enough market for a competitor to grow into a potential risk for taking away market elsewhere too".
Limited to JSONB types though, by the looks of it.
Final Decision on Chromebook Case in Denmark
I see Ars Technica taking a lot of flak in the comments but lawdy, they’re still pretty great and one of the news sources I actually pay for (full-text rss feeds are a nice bonus).

Just to pick a few of their writers who still kill it: Lee Hutchinson for anything sysadmin related, Eric Berger does the best space/rocket coverage on the entire internet, Jonathan Gitlin does a ton of in-depth automotive coverage and his passion for it bleeds through in every article, Andrew Cunningham’s insane macOS reviews that he took over from John Siracusa. I could go on but would basically be copy-pasting from their staff directory…

https://arstechnica.com/staff-directory/

If Condé Nast eventually kills the site so be it, but its been 16y since their acquisition and still a daily read for me.
I suspect there are cultural preferences here, there's no reason to believe there's one correct answer for all of humanity.

I'm from the US but I've traveled to places where it's considered rude to say "no" directly and apologies aren't common. Like when trying to order an unavailable item from a menu:

- I'd like the beef burger
- The chicken burger is very good
- That's OK, can I have the beef burger?
- Our hot dogs are also very good

I'd guess that text like "Access denied" or "You don't have access" would feel too direct and may come off as rude in that context. A "sorry" would feel out of place. Perhaps "This page is access restricted" would be best, as it alludes to the user not having access without directly saying it.

Conversely, I much prefer quick and direct communication with or without the apology: "[Sorry,] we don't have the beef burger."

I'd love to hear opinions of non-US and non-Westerners on this. We're in a thought bubble otherwise.
Swapping all the CO2 in the atmosphere for Cl would kill us all within 30 minutes (at 400ppm). It's way more dangerous.
I would love for there to be a vibrant European tech scene. But these same sort of business-hostile behavior is exactly why there isn't a European version of Silicon Valley.
It's understandable to feel overwhelmed by the demands of a full-time job, especially when trying to balance personal interests and hobbies. Many people struggle with finding the time and energy to pursue their passions outside of work.
I believe in the power of lifelong learning and the importance of staying curious and engaged. Our diverse range of courses and programs cater to individuals of all backgrounds and interests, from tech enthusiasts to music aficionados.
Whether you're looking to delve into the latest advancements in AI, explore the works of great literary masters, or hone your musical talents, we have something for everyone.VISIT <ahref="https://infycletechnologies.com/digital-marketing-course-in-... Technologies</a>
Typically in the unsafe languages under discussion they use the IEEE754 types without even a first thought. For example you can expect them to sort such types (you can define rules for sorting them, but if you just didn't in C too bad your program has Undefined Behaviour, while in C++ today it's even worse you've silently not written a C++ program at all and it never had any defined behaviour even before it tried to execute your invalid sort)
7% is $26.8 billion for last year.
A lot of software copy writing becomes so much easier when you ditch the silly facade of ‘the computer’ saying things. Instead treat the whole scenario as the software acting as an agent of the organisation, with the copy being written by a human on behalf of the organisation. So, a lot of “we…”.

This in my opinion makes software a whole lot more friendly, human, and overall just…usable. It gives way more opportunity to convey things in a way that doesn’t leave people scratching their heads and reaching for the knowledge base, where a lot of orgs are a lot less scared of writing like robots.

The issue though is the amount of software written by people in America, or should I say California, where there is a very distinct ‘fake-politeness’. I genuinely can’t tell whether or not they know how much it sticks out like a sore thumb to everyone else. In this case, the software being more human backfires, because allowing the human to shine through is just allowing us to see the shitty fake-happy way that humans at the organisation think that the organisation should be talking to customers.

TL;DR: writing like a human is good, unless your humans are bad.
Debian and other distro repositories would like to disagree. When the packager doesn't provide the final build, it becomes much harder for malware/adware to reach end users. Not technically impossible, but much harder than direct-to-users stores such as Apple AppStore or Flathub where it is trivial because whatever binary the uploader provides ends up directly running on user machines.
Ultimately getting rid of shitty and privacy invading products is exactly what this all is for.
>murder

Setting a bunch of cookies isn’t something I would equate to murder.

If you want me to read your article please use less hyperbole. The author sounds like an unhinged lunatic who takes his pet issue way too seriously.
RecuperaBit: A tool for forensic file system reconstruction
When you gut a part of your company to spin it out as separate company that isn't going to have same union contracts and can be then squeezed as hard as possible...

First you create the reverse monopoly then ensure the toxicity, all in chasing supposed "value add" of final assembly and coordination (to paraphrase the Boeing CEO who made the strategy, who wasn't from McDonnell but was a Boeing lifer)
WEF is in winter
Not the photos but the fact that the bolts are missing and there are are no witness marks indicating they were present when the door ejected.
As far as I know there is a limit. I think it is 100 querys per day.
Europe is 25% of Apples Revenues. If they exit with the App Store, nobody is going to buy an iPhone anymore.
You want iPhones and iPads and MacBooks to be discontinued from the European market?
Only in tech do we dismiss all of the absolutely deadly degrees of freedom in life to defend the entrenched positions of monopolies.

We won't even mention the decades of research and literal human millennia of engineering efforts that went into the best practices that can protect people.

Sandboxes, what are those? Surely only two companies lording over everything can protect us from ourselves. Free web installs are just as bad as speeding cars, chainsaws, electrocution, etc.
> Mainframes are really powerful for some specific domain which most people on HN don't work in.

Yeah, but the cases where mainframes run the show are the ones where stuff really matters, where actual human lives and existences are at stake: banks, insurances, governments, airlines, logistics. If Google has a day long outage, not much of value will be lost... but a large US bank, stock exchange or MC/Visa suddenly failing? That can be enough to trigger an actual bank run with all its consequences.

(Of course, the argument can and should be made that no company should grow large enough to even be able to be such a threat, but that one will have to wait until at least 2028 to get solved)
They just keep adding new features for fear of losing their position because they can't decorate the release notes. MS doesn't give high marks for bug fixes. Thus the bugs keep growing.
The geostrategic impact is the most important point my eyes as well. Except for the USA, Norway and Britain pretty much all of the West's oil is from autocratic countries. Every wind generator, every solar panel that we put into use now will reduce that consumption for decades to come. Only an increase of energy consumption would work against this, but for example the EU is very much pushing it's citizens to save energy, even something small like LED light bulbs will contribute.
Putin's war on Ukraine and the outfall in form of the EU reducing its gas addiction will mean that Russia is loosing millions of gas consumers not just for the duration of the war, but forever. Europe replaces its gas heating installations with other systems and pushes for better insulation. No one will go back to gas no matter how Putin's insane war ends.
As a cyclist I'm not a fan of car and the current EVs, but once batteries take that big hurdle and production isn't reliant on China, all the money sent to autocrats to buy oil and lithium batteries will stay in the West. I'm all for that.
That is not true at all
> Degrowth is murder, anyone promoting it is evil.

That's some emotive rhetoric there. I'm thinking that you're pretty passionate about the subject, and therefore not remotely objective.
And many many company internal tools, that won't be rewritten and just get replaced with something better(ReactJS?) over time.

It would be around for long is nice, but you can't make a career using it these days.

jquery, perl just some of those insanely useful tools which get the work done, but they don't pay you well these days.
Somehow I think it is still better than the YAML spaghetti that is used for the same purpose nowadays.
Making a character count component more accessible
It’s pretty safe to assume that people find being on hold a neutral to negative experience. Not a whole lot of guesswork there.
So? It's still 7%. What happens when compliance or fees costs them $30 billions? Those go up with scale too.
It's using comptime inline for, see https://github.com/cztomsik/tokamak/blob/main/src/injector.z...
We don't need a silicon valley. No need for a ultra concentrated tech valley. We have many small tech valleys all over Europe. With many many good, honest, privacy respecting companies.

We just don't have that unicorn culture. But do we need highly overvalued tech businesses?
Both these error messages fail the "where do we go from here?" test - disrespecting the user with requiring open ended work on their part.

Having some breadcrumbs to get back to the right track is much more valuable than flowery wordings. Eg: Message too large - failed to send email. Network unavailable - failed to send email. Subscription expired - failed to send email. Unexpected service outage - https://email.io/status - failed to send email.
That requires each and every user to do the moderation for themselves. Which few if any want. Most users actually want moderation, as long as they can decide whose ban list applies to the content they see.
This is not a language extension, it is a pure library feature. C++ has had async/await for a while, so it is perfectly suited for that; sender/receivers build on top of that functionality.

In any case, Eric Niebler now works at NVidia, which has expressed an interest on Senders/Receivers as they are not just for networking, but a general mechanism for composition of async operations.

I still have my concerns, as I think the heavily templating will come at a cost of clarity, but I haven't tried them on a large application yet.
Yes, I certainly do: if Apple can't behave, there's no reason their unrepairable, overpriced garbage should stay on the EU market.
The webfinger handle does not need to be on the same domain/hostname as the Mastodon server. E.g. not on completely different domains, but for Mastodon it makes no difference, but my personal Mastodon install is on m.galaxybound.com but my webfinger handle is on galaxybound.com.

And there was no need to make a new protocol for a portable identity - a change to ActivityPub to support did's as actor urns would be sufficient, and would also open the door to unilateral account migration fairly easily.

This is my big problem with Bluesky - all of their gripes about ActivityPub would be easily solved in ways that'd make interop a temporary problem of getting people to buy into protocol tweaks, instead of inventing something from scratch.

Their claim that it's not easily possible to retrofit e.g. did's and signed repositories onto ActivityPub makes me question whether they understand ActivityPub at all, because there's nothing about it that would be problematic. E.g. objects are already signed - their mechanism for migration would require some changes to the signing mechanism to allow users to make a unilateral assertion that the key on their new instance belongs to them, but not much more. DID's is down to how ActivityPub clients and servers resolve URLs, nothing more.

You wouldn't even need everyone to buy into these changes - the worst case would be lack of federation w/instances that fail to support it - in other words no worse than starting your own network.

Even then it'd be possible to maintain fairly broad interop by announcing the did's in ways that'd allow also specifying resolvable urls to a proxy.
It's also done this way so a real emergency exit can be installed instead of the plug if the airline (or another airline that buys the plane) decides to increase seating capacity. It would be really inconvenient (not to mention mechanically questionable) if you would have to weld additional stuff onto the fuselage to accomplish this, so the parts that are connected to the door frame are already there...
> The truth is that decrying things like Apple's splash screen about the use of alternative stores, for example, is ridiculous.

The article is talking about splash screens for 3rd party payments (like this: https://developer.apple.com/support/images/apps-using-altern...) not for 3rd party app stores (like this: https://developer.apple.com/support/images/alternative-app-m...).

I would agree the app store warning is pretty reasonable: "<site> would like to install an App Marketplace" is clear and to the point, sure (and the article doesn't disagree).

"This app doesn't support the App Store's private and secure payment system" as the main headline on a full screen warning with a huge long scary blurb every time you try to pay anybody who isn't Apple is not reasonable.

This is not the great danger Apple is pretending it is - literally every single one of their customers has paid money to somebody outside the App Store in the past. Being aware of the risks of that is a basic & essential skill that everybody who owns a credit card must have already. Apple has a responsibility to protect non-technical users against technical risks, but it does not (and should not) try to protect users from lack of very basic life skills.

> Apple has all the legal rights to do that

That's not necessarily true at all!

I'm sure there'll have a good lawyerly debate on this soon, but the DMA requirements generally seem to mandate no restrictions for these new features than those strictly required to preserve device integrity & security.

Given that the existing global payment system is very familiar to all their customers, far more widely used than App Store purchases, and _generally pretty good_ (yes, you can quibble on UX and subscription management, but we all use it all the time, there's plenty of anti-fraud backstops, and payments in the world outside the app store do work) I don't think this screaming warning can be justified as an essential measure required to protect user security. To me, it looks like a unnecessarily scary screen actively discouraging users away from their competition.

A small calm confirmation for "Pay outside the App Store? This payment will be handled by 'Example Dev' directly." would be far more justifiable.
> And the dependency on Russia was a bit of an issue for the first winter of the war but prices are back to normal now.

I am all for "let's cut the gas" blabla, but it's a bit unfair to say "prices are back to normal" (which is also not entirely true from the consumer perspective): lots of companies had to shut down, some will, some left to go to other "better" places, some fired thousands of people because of energy prices. I don't see that coming back any time soon, to be honest.
I have zero doubt in my mind that Apple is in for a rude awakening. No way will the EU stand this level of malicious compliance.

The gloves are off and I fully expect for Apple to not come out unscathed.
He is talking about supercharger rates, so let's compare apples to apples - Ionity 0,7EUR/kWh, Enel 0,8EUR/kWh. It is actually worse than in USA.
I'm a self-employed consultant, generally either CTO-style "make your company run better and build better software" stuff or, less often, specific robotics and automation stuff where I'm legitimately something of an expert. I have a PhD in decision theory / optimisation / meta-computing - and it was all applied to autonomous vehicles. A recent client I've picked up in the mining industry is paying me something like 300% of the highest salary I ever earned before setting out on my own.

In addition, I co-founded a company that makes Escape Rooms. We sold 13 turn-key rooms to other operators, then eventually invested in our own venue. We were the only company in the southern hemisphere to win a prestigious TERPECA award this year, so it's not a stretch to say our venue is probably the best in Australia. I've never earned a cent from this in eight years... But, this year is the one. Maybe. Probably. Hopefully?!?
There’s only one person that broke reddit, and it was Kimmy K.
You're free to think otherwise, but this is what I've been repeatedly told by entrepreneurs in Europe (who mostly copy US ideas), and europeans living in Silicon Valley (who came here to innovate in ways they can't back home).
Putting the HTTP method and path directly in the function's name using Zig @-syntax is something I've never seen before. Clever.
If you were a designing an app store that provides apps that are safe for non technical users you would probably want to ensure:

excellent curation where human reviewers can have deep knowledge of all of the apps that have been reviewed/published,

clear provenance so you can be strongly confident of the source/supply of the applications in case of abuse or infra compromise (with a smaller problem blast radius for each app)

alternative app stores so that end users are never beholden to your app store and they can get similar or the same apps from elsewhere if your policies or practices change for the worse.

Some of these help ensure that no third party can maliciously update an app at the behest of a criminal actor without also compromising the app developer, or that no third party can gather invasively detailed information and fingerprinting surface concerning the apps people use and have in case of dissent.

Apple don't seem to have any interest in doing any of this, so I can't understand how their solution would be better for less tech-savvy users.
Steel is not magic. People don't get this excited over UK copper and lead production. The UK was a steel leader due to easily accessible iron resources, which are greatly depleted now.

It is worth considering the environmental footprint of our trading partners, but note that they are rapidly improving as well as renewables come down the cost curve.
It only takes one obfuscated line of code buried somewhere deep where you wouldn't expect it.
The Real Shim Shady – How CVE-2023-40547 Impacts Most Linux Systems
I have used objective reasoning to conclude that degrowth is murder. Now I'm passionately opposing it. Same with Nazism, Communism, Decolonization, Hamas, etc.
But how long does bare H2 remain in the atmosphere, given that it's pretty reactive and light enough to leave entirely?
In some way I secretly hope that the EU is waiting for DMA to come into effect in March to declare Apple as non compliant and hit them as hard as they can.
I got to spend a couple years writing Dart (not Flutter) and found it to be the best of both worlds. Such an underappreciated language.
This extra table approach is how the django_simple_history[1] implements model history. Although it hooks into the Django ORM to save history rather than triggers. It's simple and brilliant, and I look it into any model that needs the ability to revert.

[1] https://django-simple-history.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
>But there was a curious pattern to GDPR enforcement: while smaller, EU-based companies were swiftly shuttered by its provisions, the US-based giants that conduct the most brazen, wide-ranging, illegal surveillance escaped unscathed for years and years, continuing to spy on Europeans. (...) One (erroneous) way to look at this is as a "compliance moat" story. In that story, GDPR requires a bunch of expensive systems that only gigantic companies like Facebook and Google can afford. These compliance costs are a "capital moat" – a way to exclude smaller companies from functioning in the market. Thus, the GDPR acted as an anticompetitive wrecking ball, clearing the field for the largest companies, who get to operate without having to contend with smaller companies nipping at their heels. This is wrong. (...) A harder look at what happened with the GDPR reveals a completely different dynamic at work. The reason the GDPR vaporized small surveillance companies and left the big companies untouched had nothing to do with compliance costs. The Big Tech companies don't comply with the GDPR – they just get away with violating the GDPR

Nothing about what he wrote refutes the GDPR being a "compliance moat".

In fact, he even spells it out himself: "And that's why Google and Facebook haven't been extinguished by the GDPR while their rivals were. It's not compliance moats – it's impunity. Once a corporation attains a certain scale, it has the excess capital to spend on phony relocations that let it hop from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, chasing the loosest slots on the strip."

He has the idea that a requirement is only a compliance moat if a small player can't comply (because of complexity, costs, etc), but a big one can.

But it's fine for the "compliance moat" purposes that the small player can't comply and the big player can just ignore compliance. It's still a great moat, and it can still be consciously created as a moat: "Let's put out a law that makes it difficult for small players to do this shit, and we big players have avenues to bypass").