skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you have a customer and DNS seems to work strangely, have a look if you don't have a so called single-label domain for Active Directory, such as host1.internal or crusty.internal if you have more creative admins or even worse, db.local.
On Windows, the name resolution on single-label domains behaves a bit differently, using NetBIOS resolution which can prevent you from e.g. adding a new host to the domain from a different subnet - you might see this as DNS failure. Of course, it is not DNS's fault, if it wasn't asked in the first place.

Here are some more details:
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/300684/deployment-a...
and
https://admx.help/?Category=Windows_10_2016&Policy=Microsoft...
which does the DNS resolution even for these less than ideal domains.
This guide I linked is literally how to do that if and how you are able to, especially when you do not know where to start. Those movements start small, with a few people organising and snowballing. This is a guide on starting that process, not finishing. We need to show people how to begin if we want mass action, and the groundwork for strong movements is extremely important as it is inherently a bottom-up approach to societal change.
How much RAM are you able to set aside for a ryzen igpu?
IIRC Spectrum has the biggest piece of this pie, and they use an in-house eligibility verification system. There's probably a relationship between those two facts.

Unlike you, I didn't report my issues at the time, but since this whole thing has blown up in the news (and unfortunately become politicized) I have submitted letters detailing my experience. Hopefully they'll get to the bottom of things and find a way to throw out the bathwater without the baby.
Have you seen the Tissot connect? Latest version is pretty good
We also had an overseas move and back around 20 years ago. This wiped the slate for many of my older devices that weren't worth either exporting or re-importing.

Of items I bought myself and still use, oldest is a mini-Maglite flashlight I bought in the early 1980s. But it's a Ship of Theseus situation, converted to LED a decade ago. My next oldest item is a pair of Sony noise-cancelling headphones from around 20 years ago. Both operate on standard alkaline batteries, so are not doomed like so many other portable devices.

My iPod nano, circa 2007, is on the verge of death, unable to hold a charge for a whole song. It works attached to USB power/dock. From what I've read, it will probably kill itself soon when the battery swells.

If I include inherited items, I have things my dad bought new in the 1960s-1980s. Power tools like a drill, circular saw, soldering iron, heat gun, bench-top drill press, shop lights, and extension cords. We're also using major appliances, some probably from the late 1990s or early 2000s, including dual-fuel oven, refrigerators, dishwasher, and laundry washer and dryer. The oldest is the gas central forced-air furnace from the mid 1970s.
> This is exciting but incredibly niche atm.

However, the "niche" is a non-trivial one--injection molds.

Machines already exist which deposit metal and also have a 3-axis CNC head that can then polish up the surface of that metal in the same envelope. This lets you directly print 3D molds with conformal cooling.

So, it doesn't matter if your machine is "slow" as long as it's faster than your alternatives for producing an injection mold.
> You can brake with more than 0.67 g.

Of course you can but we're not talking about G-forces. That's a coefficient of friction [0], a dimensionless measure. It's determined empirically literally by rubbing things together and is then used to calculate the friction force between different materials.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friction#Coefficient_of_fricti...
It sounds like it works on the vendor driver. So if there is a chip bug there has to be a way to work around it. We just don’t know what it is.
Darn, I wish they had named it breakout wars instead.
This is exactly the wrong time to use a LLM. Case in point: those coordinates are not in the Atlantic ocean.
Not sure about that. Maybe you are listening more about their speech then their actions.

But I kind of respect their strong opinion about user experience.
I have actually read the Ethernet standard almost cover-to-cover, but GP was referring to Ethernet in the common use, not the technically-available options that can be tapped if your building happens to be from the 80's (or is a car). Also, at this point, a lot less of the available "Ethernets" can be tapped than you may be thinking.
I haven't been using windows since win 10 and I was shocked at the garbage I had to go through when I installed win 11 in a vm.

Forced online account creation, page after page asking to enable data, ad preferences for what normally costs a lot of money, all of this seems crazy when I compare it with a recent Linux install which had zero things I had to agree to. The windows ULAs are so long you can't even read them if you wanted to.

At least I only paid USD 3 for the license because anything more than that IMO is insane at this point.
In Australia this was the case for our incentive rates for early adopters but their windows were all quite small and they started to wind up.

They helped hugely with bringing the cost of installation down and also creating a positive attitude to solar panels.

Sometimes giving free money to the rich means that it’s electorally popular enough that the right wing won’t roll it back when they get in.
Right, in the wheels locked scenario the dynamic coefficient is the one that matters, it's smaller than the static coefficient and that leads to a longer braking distance.

For a rolling wheel however, the stationary object is ideally just a point of the wheel, trying to move against the surface; but as soon as the wheel wins against the surface, the point rotates away and a new point tries to move against the surface. Even in the less ideal case a point of the tire always touches the same point of the asphalt from the moment it touches the ground to the moment it leaves it. So in that case you use the static coefficient.

For a more visual explanation see https://youtu.be/J0PVm4XTGeY?si=20TygSRdH3UxIx_4
For language learning (as in, natural languages), I've found LLMs work very well in a similar "tutor" role.

Asking about the grammar in a sentence, for example, or how concepts relate to each other. Somehow it works really well.
When I go to Settings > Cellular, all I see is a list of apps and a toggle to turn off cellular access for the apps. If you can help me find the wifi toggle, that would be amazing.
I think we need a global register of home office friendly companies so we know which places to avoid, just to get the message across.
Last I heard Leqembi has been shown to reduce the amyloid plaques characteristic of Alzheimer's, but has not been shown to have an actual impact on disease progression. Is that still the case?
"Global Room-Temperature Superconductivity in Graphite" (2023)
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qute.202300230 :

> ... [Pyrolytic graphene] ... 4.5 K ≤ T ≤ 300 , T > 300 K ... A theory of global superconductivity emerging in the array of linear structural defects is developed which well describes the experimental findings and demonstrate that global superconductivity arises as a global phase coherence of superconducting granules in linear defects promoted by the stabilizing effect of underlying Bernal graphite via tunneling coupling to the three dimensional (3D) material.
I was curious so looked it up. FORTRAN had a predecessor: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speedcoding.
Thread hijack: where can I get a replacement screen? Mine is very scratched up.
There are a few:

If you need rapid, real time responses to external signals, the faster clocked 8 bitters are excellent! Many chips can get into an interrupt service routine in just a handful of cycles. In tandem with this, these devices can pack a lot of logic into a small amount of code.

From Dallas Semi: Our 1 clock-per-machine-cycle processors reached a remarkable performance goal—1 clock-per-machine-cycle, currently at 33 million instructions per second (MIPS).

From Silicon Labs: The proven 8051 core received a welcome second wind when its architecture lost patent protection
in 1998. [...] The original Intel 8051 core took 12 cycles to execute 1 instruction; thus, at 12 MHz, it ran at 1million
instructions per second (1 MIP). In contrast, a 100 MHz Silicon Labs 8051 core will run at 100 MIPS or
100 times faster than the classic 8051 at a frequency that is only about 8x the classic 8051’s
frequency.

That's really fast, when it comes to responding to external events!

Say one needs to read an incoming data stream, or control something moving at a high rate of speed. Both of these tasks depend on a device that can sense and respond in as close to real time as things get.

Large, production proven, time tested code bodies. 6502, 8051, z80, etc... all have a ton of library code that's not difficult to understand and make use of.

Often, these 8 bit designs can run on crazy low power, or operate very efficiently at full speed.

Licensing isn't generally an issue. Adding a well documented and production proven 8 bit core to a specialized design works pretty well! Often, the custom hardware on chip does the heavy lifting, leaving UX and control tasks, both of which are easy and lean enough for 8 bits of CPU to make sense.

The last thing I would put here is subjective, but ease of development can be an advantage, but it depends on the developer. Once someone has bootstrapped themselves onto 8 bit computing, the constraints on development both limit possible application scope and with that limit comes ease of development. When used to their strengths, simple chips like these are easy to develop for. It's possible for one person to completely understand a device and with that understanding fully exploit it.
America with more stringent environmental laws will do more to combat carbon emissions, and manufacturing will move overseas. China makes more carbon. Is this your win?
Throwing a cache into a system that never had a cache before can be quite tricky.

You could have these kinds of memory pages:

* Fixed ROM bank

* Bankswitchable ROM bank

* Fixed RAM bank

* Bankswtichable RAM bank

* IO memory

* RAM that's read by external devices

* RAM that's written to by external devices (basically just IO)

Caching is trivially easy for fixed a ROM or RAM bank which are not used by other devices. Caching a bankswitchable bank requires either invalidating on bankswitch, or knowing the bank switching well enough to just cache everything. Pure IO memory is simple, no caching for that at all. For RAM that's read by other devices, Write-Through caching would work.
Ur/Web has some incredible ideas. The main ones being:

* HTML fragment type and literals. It's analogous to React's JSX and helps you write statically-checked and type-safe HTML.

* SQL literals. Sort of like LINQ in C#. This ensures that your SQL is statically checked, so you can't end up with invalid queries at runtime, and type-safe.

* Allows you to write client side code in Ur. This means that you can, for example, write a button's `onclick` that issues a (strong-typed) RPC call to the backend all in Ur. Sort of like tRPC for TypeScript.

You can find all of these features in other web stacks, as mentioned. But in Ur/Web everything is tightly integrated. And you can also be sure of your app's correctness due to all the static and type checks.

Those are the good parts. The bad part is that Ur/Web went down the ML rabbit-hole. You pretty much have to be familiar with an ML language to be able to use it. It also suffers from the usual low adoption of ML languages.
I once wrote a fuzzer for some code that serialized and deserialized a particular data structure that included a timestamp -- the complexity cannot be overstated.

Basically every possible edge case came up: floats can be infinity, negative infinity, negative zero, NaN, and even subnormal. The bulk of the problems occurred because we deserialized the float timestamp and proceeded to do unchecked math on it, then expected it to be a normal value.
I grant that the hardware side remains messy

Other than that, how was the play Mrs Lincoln.
Grid connected solar disables itself in this case.

You need a compatible inverter for it to work, and they're quite uncommon.
I’m not sure why my comment elicited such a volatile response, but assuming you are just using emphatic language for effect I will respond.

The main point you made that I can not agree with the characterization of other languages being ‘trivially stack-based’. Other languages in the Algol, ML, Lisp families have stacks that are an implementation detail of their function semantics. In those languages the stack is an implicit storage mechanism that merely holds values which are semantically associated with some ‘variable’ in the program syntax. In ‘stack-based languages’ the stack is, most usually, an explicit semantic construct which acts as the only available value for procedures to act on.

If your primary argument is against the term ‘stack-based’ that’s a personal position, but there are semantic differences between Forth and C, where emphasizing the explicitness of the stack in Forth is a viable point of divergence. As to using the term concatenative to describe a language, I have some opinions on that which fall outside the norm, so I tend to not use it to describe any of the ‘popular’ languages usually lumped under that umbrella.

I don’t know if the ‘pet language’ remark was towards me or in general, but it was certainly baseless if directed at my comment. If it is a general statement, I would only say that it is common for a community to settle on some terminology that they like and it’s rarely out-group pressure that forces a change in that language (see the ‘Alan Kay invented the term Object Oriented and it doesn’t describe C++’ argument that occurs frequently on forums like HN).
I’ve tried to find studies that actually differentiate cognitive development improvements for cursive writing but everything I found has the same results for manuscript and cursive, but that active writing with either script is the important thing.

Does anyone have references I missed?

This feels on the surface suspect. Why would cursive have some special value over any other script for cognitive development?
Just a note that this is from 2020, but probably still an important read for those who need a primer.
Meh. I write almost exclusively in cursive because I use pens, particularly fountain pens, and it's much faster to write that way. In my experience cursive also works a lot better when using styluses because the flow of the letters helps hide that 20ms lag. When I use pencils, I tend to write in block letters because I think that flow helps a lot with cursive and my personal opinion is that pencils don't give as many of the same advantages as a good ink pen and that graphite works better when done in short strokes rather than curves.

It's not a useless skill. I'm happy to know cursive and I enjoy writing it, and I like the way that it looks. There is an intrinsic joy in writing in a beautiful way. It's a faster way to write. But it's certainly not a skill that anyone needs to feel obligated to learn or shamed for avoiding. I'm skeptical of claims that it improves cognitive outcomes, I'm not sure how that would be tested in the first place in a controlled way.

I'm also largely unsympathetic to arguments about aesthetics, tradition, etc... Reminds me a lot of the "everyone should learn to play an instrument/do a sport/etc" arguments. Things can be good without being mandatory. Lots of stuff will improve your cognition, social skills, and character, but not every single thing that does so needs to be a requirement.

----

I kind of put cursive in the same bucket as Vim. I'm glad I know Vim, I think it's a faster way to edit text, I think that over time it becomes more intuitive even if only being used at a basic level. Practicing modal editing certainly could have cognitive benefits I suppose. And I think it's just an elegant and an aesthetically pleasing way to reason about text.

But do I think people should be required to learn Vim? No, of course not.

----

I don't think it does any harm to teach stuff like this; a lot of early elementary education isn't really about the stuff that's being taught so much as it is about learning how to be taught and how to operate in group settings and how to excel at something. But I'd find it difficult to justify passing a law about or caring enough to try and mandate cursive; I'd be tempted to take those requirements and expand typing programs even more than what's currently required.

Learning to type well had an immense positive impact on my life that I think is easy to quantify. In contrast, learning cursive... :shrug: I'm hard pressed to think of how my life would have been different if I never learned it, other than that I might not have become quite as snobby about pens as I am today :)
While not being officially supported, rocm runs just fine on my 6700XT, i just have to set an env var(export HSA_OVERRIDE_GFX_VERSION=10.3.0)
Physicist Sabine Hossenfelder on recent scientific publication, describing temperature rise about 5 deg. Celsius within 20 years.
"This bug is completely trivial to avoid. Just rewrite your whole product in a different language".
Low code and no code tools claiming it's over for programmers
Totally agree

And now actually, I don’t even need service with satellite SOS.
Because you might want to use sleep tracking and alarms. I have a watch with a three day battery life and it's nice to not have to charge it often.
Dont worry about the macro trends. Its a distraction. Just move to where ever the cash is. The cash is always moving. Like water searching for level. This is what the average tech worker from the rest of the world has done to survive. Moving to South Korea or Dubai is better than driving for Uber.
I run roughly 60 site's wifi across the UK according to my Unifi VM, which has been trundling along for over five years now.

One of those sites is my home, another my brother's home and another my dad's and another is at work. At least one of the others, you might have heard of.

I'm not quite so jaded as @roboman. I suggest you keep up with the Joneses. The latest is wifi 7 and if we get a bit conservative, we might consider 6 as current and hence the advice is stick to wifi 4!

That's not my advice. I suggest that we embrace the latest stuff and learn how it works. If necessary you can always spin up another SSID with special properties.

I've got devices from fridges to ESP80266 wired thingies and laptops and phones and whatever all working fine.
Actually I may take back my previous thought. While I don't think there's curiosity, I think it could be mimicked pretty well by a reward function similar to social media bots. Initially it will explore specifically what mathematicians ask. Then it will start producing intermediate results. It can learn what intermediate results are interesting by standard engagement models. Once that gets good enough, it may start to understand how to explore deeper questions without being prompted. At that point someone may decide to fund it just to continuously explore on its own and report anything interesting. Eventually it'll get so good at this that human mathematicians won't be able to keep up. IDK what happens after that.
Looks like the box shows 16oz., so probably 6 x 16oz.
That's why science sorely needs phenomenology - careful observation of phenomena without prejudice and also without desire to analyse. It's this desire that paves the way to epistemic hell.
Users hate this, because it requires them to do two email round trips (the first to recover the account ID).
What is the difference between Bernal (1961) graphite and N-layer graphene?

Electronic properties of graphene:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_properties_of_graph...

Graphene (2004) :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene

Bilayer graphene (2004) : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilayer_graphene

Graphene nanoribbon > Applications:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene_nanoribbon #Applications
I heard Santa had something to do with it too!
Ground-mount arrays can also use bifacial panels-- solar panels without the opaque backing that can capture light from both sides at once.
The Catacombs
Define "read".

If you read one favorite book 20 times, is that counted as 'one' or as 'twenty'?
Not quite. QBASIC.EXE/EDIT.EXE use the text mode ROM font. If you didn't load a specific font in DOS (e.g. to switch code pages), you'd get whatever your graphic card's ROM shipped with.
You took the wrong thing away from the comment. I'm not saying you shouldn't do email password resets. We do. Everybody does. I'm saying: be ultra careful with that code.

Gitlab is both open source and has an on-prem product, so my guess is that you're simply hearing about more of the Gitlab bugs than you would with a comparably sized competitor.
Hamza al-Dahdouh and Mustafa Thuraya were not active combatants when they were killed:

> According to Al Jazeera correspondent Hisham Zaqout, Hamza al-Dahdouh and a group of journalists were en route to the Moraj area north-east of Rafah - which was designated a "humanitarian zone" by the Israeli army - but which had reportedly experienced recent bombings.

They were fleeing an area in Khan Younis being bombed to a designated safe zone in Rafah when their car was hit by an Israeli missile.

Even if we take the IDF at their words—which we shouldn’t—this is still not a shred of evidence they were active combatants when they were killed.

But we shouldn’t take IDF at their words, they have been proven to lie consistently when they target journalist. A high profile case was when they murdered Shireen Abu Akleh, changing their story multiple times until, finally, when the evidence against their story was so overwhelming, they finally admitted to targeting her.

As for the instagram thread. We really need a name to go with this. Who is this person? Is he on the list of the 88 which the Israel has murdered so far? ~The second photo doesn’t even look like it is the same person, and the third photo even looks photoshopped (and fails to show other results in a reverse google image search)~ [wrong, see edit].

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67905566

EDIT: I found the origin of the photos in the instagram thread: https://nabd.com/s/121499899-f165c6/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%82%D8%B3...

His name was Muhyiddin Muhammad Muhammad al-Sadoudi and was a 24 year old fighter for the al-Qassam brigade, who died during active training in July last year, not by the Israeli army, and not in the current war. Only claimed to be a fighter, and never claimed to be a photojournalist by Hamas’s armed wing. He is not on the list of the 88 journalists in Gaza murdered by the Israeli army.
> which is a bit of an unexpected outcome

I don't see it. Coal fireplaces are relying on the same idea as the ICE car, this fuel is so cheap to use that it won't matter if we use it inefficiently. But unlike cars, your house isn't going anywhere.

One thing people tend to get wrong about heating is that because of the laws of thermodynamics it seems as though any method must always be 100% efficient and thus it can't matter. But actually we care what gets heated. Fireplaces heat the air in the chimney well but you don't live there - you live in the rest of the house. As little as 20% of the thermal energy in the coal is converted into a warm living space, and that makes it pretty easy for electrical solutions to compete.

Something like a gas boiler heating water for radiators still can't deliver the same point of use efficiency (as resistive heating) because the burned gas is toxic, so we need to put that warm gas outside (otherwise what you've made is a death trap, not a warm home), yet we'd like to capture as much of the warmth as possible, the result is we're maybe 80% efficient. It's much easier to add radiators than chimneys, so the result is much better, but far from perfect.