skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Honestly, part the issue is the DMA does little about the infringement of personal property rights of device owners.

Just going to repost this comment I made a few days ago to explain:

Also you should be able run unsigned code on hardware you own if you want. One tenant of property ownership is the right of exclusion. Normally you would be able to choose what software to run or not run, but in this instance apple also has a say and they can say nope not that.

Here is the rub, normally when you sell something all rights are transferred, by the sale. If you wished to reserve rights it generally would require a contract/lease ect... However, apple here is using cryptography to effectively reserve the right of exclusion regarding what software can and can not run on that ARM core. The problem is you can go right now buy a iPhone and without even opening the box and agreeing to anything Apple has effectively already kept that right from you. Let me explain.

Let's say you did not want to use any of Apples software and install Linux on your phone. Apple still has the keys to the boot-ROM. The hardware will not boot any code not signed by apple. Here's the rub apple sold you the device which should have transferred all rights of that device. However, even after that sale Apple is maintaining the right to exclude software from executing on hardware they no longer own. This should be illegal, but they get away with some how probably because most people don't understand fully what's going on here.

In essence, Apple is encroaching upon individuals' personal property rights, particularly the right of exclusion. By employing cryptography post-sale, Apple effectively reserves the right to control what software can run on a device they no longer officially own.

For a more in-depth exploration of the right of exclusion, I highly recommend reading the paper titled "Property and the Right to Exclude" [https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/33139498.pdf]

in particular the section "A. The Logical Primacy of the Right to Exclude"
The difference is, the 5% interest rates in the 90's seemed low, because we had been on a steady slide for 10-15 years from rates much higher, so they seemed low at the time.

Now a 5% interest rate seems high, since people were used to the ZIRP.
What types of data exactly are you implying that this device may capture that would be any more extreme than the data which would be captured by any other existing Apple device? I would think the Apple Watch alone has the ability to capture more data about habits and personal information than the Apple Vision Pro possibly could, considering its countless additional sensors on top of its existing ecosystem integration with the iPhone.
"And can you update the detailed plan now that we've decided to change a fundamental decision that invalidates half your planning? That'd be great mkay."
Palworld's success is partially born from Pokémon fans' discontent
€2bn buys a nice life for you and everyone you've ever been acquainted with, somewhere without an extradition treaty.
I wonder if a similar (but maybe more bloated) implementation using interfaces (and probably generics too?) will work in this case.
Well, the recent studies say nobody is having sex anymore, especially among the younger generations. So, people are not having sex and people are not having children. I’m not sure what that says. If people were having sex without having kids, that would mean something, but that isn’t the reality.
If your logic is "keep the brightest light source on your left", then for a light source that's nearby (as opposed to "infinitely" far away, like the moon) you'll end up orbiting it.

Depending on your precise navigation logic, you'll either end up with an increasing or decreasing orbit radius. If it decreases, you'll eventually crash into the light source.
> If you don’t know anyone that would be in the area of law that you’re looking for, ask for _any_ attorney recommendations, then ask those attorneys for recommendations for people in the area of law you need.

Attorneys know attorneys. I’d still recommend starting with your network, then asking those attorneys who they would recommend for the services you need. Or ask them if they know anyone that might be able to refer you.
Can someone explain why the 1st Redfin chart puts Millennial homeownership at 54.8% and the 2nd Redfin chart puts it at ~65%?
Can you elaborate on this? What IP (presumably of Broadcom's) is Upton infringing upon?
I don't think it works this way. It is more aboit things that stop family formation amd offspring creation from 15 to 35ish, of which earth ruining marratives and the trend in living standards no longer being your friend are part of it. Childhood being extended into mid to late 20's by post secondary is another, overly expensive family housing is another. among many other contributors.

If these things succeed in delaying child creation then you end up like me (if you are lucky) and pop out two kids in your late 30's with many miscarriages and discovering the third probably isnt happening with very expensive ivf and even then it is a crapshoot. If you are unlucky you find out you waited too long and indadvertently optedout of the gene pool, at which point the environmental thing is a c(nvenient excuse to use when asked.
I think it's absurd to compare the tech sector in 2023/2024 to the tech sector in 2010/2011. Unemployment is lower today, and several capital intensive industries (ML hardware acceleration for one) are significantly hotter than anything we had then.
Ferrari (the car brand) and CNH (Case IH, New Holland) were both under the same ownership a few years back, so in a way you could say they were Ferrari tractors. Seems there has been some changes in the meantime, though.
Tbh, 24 deaths in all the years since 2003 is a pretty tiny number considering just how many of these airbags were used.

I'm not saying it's a good thing, but it's also pretty low rate-wise.
There doesn't even need to be a tight supply of housing...just a predominance of landlords using the same crooked software.

https://www.propublica.org/article/yieldstar-rent-increase-r...
Did you go with first class environments? If so defmacro builds a fexpr with an an extra eval in the dynamic environment plus a flag to tell the compiler it must be inlined (and that various other things should be reported as semantic errors).

You can get somewhat close to fexpr with lazy evaluation but it turns out that's not the same thing either. Taking the arguments apart and building different things out of them is a superset of stashing it somewhere to evaluate later.

(lambda (x) ...) ; evaluate the argument in the caller, bind it to the name x

(fexpr (x) ...) ; bind the argument to the name x

(normal (x) ...) ; make a thunk out of the argument and the environment

(macro (x) ...) ; bind the argument to x then do the force inline & extra eval on call

It's interesting that macros are the one with a bunch of extra work to do after the call whereas fexpr does the bare minimum of adding stuff to the lexical environment. Lambda maps eval across the arguments, normal maps make-thunk across the arguments.
If you put in a decimal and rounded up, you would be correct.
This is why I just use VSCode now.

I enjoyed tinkering for years. One day my Vim colors wouldn’t work in Tmux for like the 5th time in my life. I said, you know what? I’m done with all of this.

I appreciate that what you did is fun. I just thought I’d share a perspective that sometimes we’re sick of tinkering.
DoD black budget.

Some highly classified CIA/NSA project needs $10M for data collection, and no one bats an eye.

Snowden revealed that CIA spent $10Bs on "data collection" per year.
There are a number of machines you can buy to do this. It's just expensive.
The inability to break out Mac windows curbed a lot of my enthusiasm for the AVP. I hope Apple will eventually add it, but I'm not going to spend $3500 on that hope.
For undefined behavior detection, I have heard of these:

- UB sanitizer https://clang.llvm.org/docs/UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer.html

- Cerberus Semantics https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~pes20/cerberus/

- https://github.com/kframework/c-semantics

- https://github.com/TrustInSoft/tis-interpreter
Oddly enough, the ADA laws were written in a way to use the free market. The government can't force you to be ADA compliant. Instead, it relies on lawyers and their disabled clients to sue you into compliance. An entire cottage industry of law firms who specialize in ADA compliance have sprung up since the law's inception.
Russia Now Using Giant Soviet-Era Anti-Ship Missile to Attack Ukraine
When to Burst a Cloud
Bonkers or no, that is a current legal reality if you're talking about chat or email messages which are sent and received using employer-provided means. If an email address ends in your employer's domain, it's not your email account unless you're self-employed.
Yeah, we should probably clean up the logs. However, I was unable to reproduce the issue. Can you send a recording to me and then I'll investigate philipp@univerbal.app
The rise of the sloppy SEC filing
Personally when I use the Quest I don’t feel like my view is limited, maybe it is tho but it’s non noticeable
Is there existing case law around browser extensions that only alter the presentation of a web page on the client machine? You know, things like adblockers or extensions that alter a specific site?
More money is more money overall, even if hourly rate falls when you work more hours than an alternative.
You're looking at reality with half of the colors your eyes can see, a reality with a limited field of view, a reality which looks much worse as the surroundings become darker. Nothing I've seen is impressive. I'm impressed by the lack of things more than what this thing actually offers.
Plenty of folks, myself and most of my FOSS colleagues included, develop using only a text editor and a shell. There's no shame in that. (PS: plus makefiles, of course, maintained in that same editor and run in that editor or in the shell.)
Building a GUI Platform
The government has a choice between there being enough housing to serve as a supportive foundation for more sophisticated economic activity, or placating private interests that don't see fit to build that housing until an arbitrary profit can be made.

States and the federal government should be building housing. Directly. Loss-leading, if they must. Sorry to the real estate magnates who would be impacted.
> I think you didn't understand - what I was implying is to leave the asserts in for a release build, because they (theoretically) never happen, because they are free optimization hints.

Remember we're not discussing our personal approaches, we're discussing what the linked post describes. It does mention UBSAN down one level of link but does not point out the pitfalls, which is the thing I'm taking issue with. I agree your approach is reasonable. It is, however, not what people reading the linked article would arrive at.

> I think it's nice because it lets you keep the same definition for both debug and release.

I would never consider turning blanket-all assert()s into assumptions for a release build. Every single assert would become a source of potential UB. This is why we have separate assert() and assume() in our codebase.
Whenever I use print for debugging I end up running the code many, many times. Each time I add another print statement. "Here1", "Here2", "Here3 %s %s %s"...

If I break out the debugger, I run the code once.
This. OP is probably a manager, and managers are often psychopaths who would absolutely steal if they could get away with it. Thus they assume that everyone else would steal if they could get away with it, and so WFH must not be allowed, because everyone will be slacking off and playing CoD.
The computers seem to still be in the building, and many of them are online. 'ssh cdc6500@tty.livingcomputers.org' seems to have trouble connecting to this particular machine right now.

By connecting via ssh to 'menu@tty.livingcomputers.org' you can try the other machines -- I was able to log into the TOPS-20 system running on the TOAD2, for instance.
Is this a net-new airbag recall?

I had to take my 2004 Matrix in a few years ago for an airbag recall identical to this. When I went the next day to pick the vehicle up, I was informed that the new airbag they had installed caused the airbag light to turn on(!) and thus were now waiting for another replacement airbag from Toyota and stuck me in a rental car for an extra day because of the unforeseen delay.

Glad to know I was driving with an equally explosive shrapnel bag for a couple years after that until a low-speed collision that totaled it (and didn't deploy the airbags).
Yes 24 people that had to die for no reason, but yeah it's low for the massive fuck up that this was.

I don't really know what the point of that statement is though. Reads like part of a Boeing spokesman's speech.
> a computer vision + laser system that could identify and zap individual weeds rather than napalming the whole ecosystem chemically

> arms that could pick only the correct, or ripe crop, or sub-varietal of crop, on a field planted with a variety of useful plants

I've seen demos for both of these in the last year or two.
If your neighborhood or development is the one with no parking and you are not in a walk-able city, you are trading dollars for the stressful situation of trying to figure out where to park, getting in to conflicts with neighbors over parking, and getting your car crashed in to or vandalized. I tried it, I didn't like it.
> their work is coming along great and they'll be checking it in real soon

This is the process problem in my mind. Why are they working on something that goes weeks without checking in code? They should have smaller actionable chunks that can be checked in at least once a week.

More importantly, take that same employee and put them in an office and do you really think things are going to be different? Alt tab is a thing, looking busy is a thing, and if you're entirely relying on their word that things are going well then you're going to get yourself in trouble regardless of whether you're in an office or remote.
am I hearing things or at 6:28 does she call her dog "Browser"
I usually have a macro called __RIGHT_HERE__ that prints a large arrow, the file name, and the line number.
What I think is missing from this article is a description of why an app dev would need access to the user's environment. Without this link, it all seems a bit paranoid, since Apple could just cut off developers from knowing anything about the background on which the app is being displayed. However, I believe a WSJ writeup described a FPS in which the furniture in your room become barriers behind which you can hide. If that's the case, then it seems like this is a very real issue, and you should treat interactive apps like this as if you are uploading an image of your entire room to the app dev, for them to use/monetize however they see fit.
You forgot the part where a lot of these big companies are still making buckets of cash and now those buckets are distributed amongst fewer people within the company further straining inequality, especially considering investors are generally rewarding companies for their reductions in force.

10,000 software developers losing their jobs in SF or Palo Alto are not going to make either of those areas affordable. Facebook's stock increasing in value 175% in 1 year is likely going to push some engineers into home buying compensation territory and the ones that can will start bidding wars for houses.

I'm not actually taking too much of a side here but its interesting how you view the ZIRP and VC industry as drivers of inequality as if VCs throwing enough money at startups so that some late 20s/early 30s person can make 180k/yr (plus some largely valueless equity) is the real problem. If anything VCs have made capital accessible to a class of people that would have otherwise been kept out of the party. During downturns and high interest rate periods, incumbents and bigger companies do well as they can weather the storm and buy up more of the market at a discount.

Even if you could drive up the interest rates to the point that these "generous endowments from VCs" and large companies cease to exist, the restaurant worker in SF won't start thriving. VC funding subsidized a lot of people's lifestyles in SF including the restaurant worker. There is not a substitute for building more housing.
Plasma chemistry recycles iron from red mud waste slurry in Germany
https://archive.is/gUxhG
The Chevy Volt was a great transitional vehicle, and I often wonder why they didn't build more cars like it. It had an all-electric drivetrain with a gas generator, which gave it slightly worse gas mileage than a true hybrid but had 50-mile all-electric range (300+ miles total), which was plenty for my daily needs. The only problem was an annoying bump with cupholders on top where the middle passenger would want their feet. If you want a city electric with the option to go on longer trips without worrying about charging, a used Volt is still an interesting option.

That said, I think all-EV is the right move even if it causes some short-term pain. Charging will get there before too long, and this lets GM focus their engineering effort. I imagine they've considered reviving some Volt-like cars to get them through the awkward transition phase.

I'm a late-stage early adopter and love my 2023 Bolt, which is quite popular and inexpensive—my sister got one, and then my parents got one too. They stupidly canceled the Bolt, but were wise enough to un-cancel it for 2025.

But they did make one really weird mistake: abandoning CarPlay. Why would they do that?
> The beauty of the US is that people have choices

This is backwards, you’ve got no choices in a lot of US cities other than to drive.
Yeah, but that's our reality we know and love.

Why not just get a few projectors or more screens if you want digital environments?
Tech Outstayed Its Welcome
People seem to forget that the dot com boom happened under very similar interest rates as today, and the tech companies that are announcing layoffs for the first time ever like Google are the least sensitive to interest rate shifts because they have their own massive treasuries.

What we are really seeing is massive extrapolations from 2020 and 2021 being completely off and companies having to manage more realistic growth expectations.
Mandatory parking minimums in American are insane.

The rules for them are a joke and just made up at random with little justification for them other than trust us bro.

Climatetown has a good, if long, video on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUNXFHpUhu8
I really wanted to be a "good citizen" and buy a hybrid for my first car.

But I ran the numbers of how much I drive and the difference in their expected MPG, plus the cost and longevity of the hybrid system...and the math didn't work out. If I kept the car long term I'd likely pay much more in repairs and eventual hybrid battery replacement then I'd get back in terms of gas.
Confetti range.
It seems that a lot of basic information is missing in the review:

1. How does it compare to an high-end monitor for text editing/programming, web browsing, watching non-VR video, playing non-VR games? Is it better or not?

2. Is the resolution, latency, FoV and lack of color fringing good enough for it to be indistinguishable from reality in both passthrough and VR modes? If not, how exactly far is it?

3. Can you run VR games on a PC with multiple desktop GPUs and stream to it? How does it compare to current high-end and ultra-high-end VR headsets?
Plus, these guys were (mentally) able to keep to those bitcoin for 100x of growth. I would guess they are likely to have more from other, legal sources, which potentially makes them millionaires. Why (indefenitely) stay in prison with a billion when you can go free with a million.
Google's "you must use Kotlin or leave" is what made it relevant, otherwise it would have been yet another JVM language with minor relevance.

And even that they had to back down, as Android was starting to lose Java libraries ecosystem, as everyone started to move beyond Java 8.
Yeah, I just randomize mine and keep all of that local. It's a bit strange seeing people doing the same, but over the wire though.
I wonder if it's mostly the ease of use of credit card payment versus the scheduled payment system of a bank website. The latter being more complex as you need to specify the destination vs a payment where you just enter your details.
So monopolies are OK but only when it benefits Europeans?
Thanks, very interesting stuff!
> have to pay a fortune to park

The free market is telling you something.
I know it's v1, I know it's expensive, I know it's limited but I cannot wait to get my hands on it this Friday.

Even with just 1 4k floating screen I think it would be a winner for me but I'm also really excited to see what people come up with in VisionOS itself. I think for a while the sweet spot (for me) with be using a virtual monitor and a handful of VisionOS apps as well. Eventually I hope to be able to pull macOS windows out of a fixed box and arrange them wherever I want but I'm fully aware that might not be this year or even next year.
I doubt browsers would allow this, though gamedevs have wanted it for decades now. Particularly UDP.
I wouldn't count on international landlords being appreciably better on average and now you're in a foreign country.

Sure, there are asshole landlords and renting always comes with its own tradeoffs. But there are a lot of places you can rent for much less than NYC if you don't need a local job.
Yes, I do not trust my understanding of C. Which is why I want mechanized assistance.
Got a PHEV first, then an EV . Having both at the same time is nice, they have slightly different use cases (just like we've always had one 'large' car, one 'small' car). Can easily see going EV only within 5 years, and could do it now with little fuss if I had to.
Modern farmers using the best practices are building back soil not exhausting it. The typical practice since about 1980-1990 was holding the line, but research has found to how build up soil and a few farmers are employing it.

While lasers are not used (yet?) you can now get sprayers that will spray chemical only on weeds and not the rest of the field. Or more likely you apply herbicide at a low dose across the whole field and then a high dose (possibly different chemical) where there is a weed.
Yeah, no. We have tight deadlines that we're expected to hit and clear milestones for reaching those deadlines. If we miss them hundreds of people throughout the organization will know and ask why, and multi-million dollar sales contracts go out the window.
One of the things I'll probably never understand is people's discomfort with and/or refusal to familiarize themselves with the use of a debugger and stepping through code. People will spend hours saturating their code with logging, rebuilding and running the code, and then spend more hours pouring through the logs as if walking around with a divining rod trying to guess what's actually happening, when they could simply set a few breakpoints, examine the variables and control flow as they're happening. The biggest "superpower" to my programming skills as a junior engineer was learning how to use the debugger well.

Yes, there are bugs that don't reproduce in your own environment, and yes, logs are a good starting point for those bugs. But, as a general tool to reach for? Not a big supporter of print() debugging.
I think it's just that people have anxiety/aren't very used to debuggers so print is less stressful even though in reality it takes 10 times more
Slight Street Sign Mods Can Fool Machine Learning Algorithms (2017)
Recalls are recalls because that's what the gov't is calling them, I do not understand this post at all.
Wine on Wayland This Year Aims for OpenGL Support, Window Minimization