skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Even on desktops it's not great for accessibility. There isn't an indicator for what has tooltips, and they appear out of the usual flow of control.

Accessibility guidelines usually allow them but encourage you to make it a last resort.
Why do you think the commenter is frustsated that nobody is reading their blog?
For fit, you can get your measurements at a tailor if you don't want to take them yourself.

Fashion style is very personal. I've found that you'll need to do lots of observing and "stealing" what speaks to you. I get my styles from people-watching, following /r/malefashionadvice and doing more research on clothes I saw someone wear in a tv show!

That said, fit is absolutely the most important factor and is what people look at first when they notice you (IMO)
> green = on, red = off

Are you sure? I think the opposite is more common.
The problem with your argument is that it assumes that the value and potential of a product is wholly known in the present, when this is often far from the case: we constantly learn new things about seemingly static entities, and the insights that we develop from them enrich other aspects of our society.

Without studying language we wouldn't have understandings of innate grammars, the psychology that develops from these understandings, the marketability from that subsequent understanding, and then finally how to make money from it (if this is how one defines value....)
The article title is "Surprise! Google Chrome goes native for Windows on Arm".

This is a non-story. For something as critically used as a web browser, being non-native would be the surprise, especially on the expected many lower-powered devices running the architecture.
Conditioning the battery isn’t a year round thing 20% more energy for 2 months a year is 1.7% efficiency loss across the full year. It’s also zero in a heated garage.

But again, as soon as you move up the chain on one car you need to move up the chain on the other or you’ll get as distorted picture of the tradeoffs.
We need a phase transition in our thinking about climate change, because our current way of thinking is taking us nowhere.

- All human activities, in different degrees, contribute to climate change. Don't believe me? Say that you bike to the office everyday. You enjoy your commute, you never develop a heart condition, and in the course of your long prosperous life you have three kids and nine grandchildren, own several dogs and get a bigger house. In other words, your climate footprint all of the sudden is greater than if you had used a polluting car and died of a heart attack when you turned forty.

By definition, humanity thriving means humanity growing, and with that its footprint on the entire planet.

- But in the aggregate, humanity is what we are. There is a price to pay for climbing that hill, but there is an even greater price for not climbing it. Critters in the Serengeti don't compose poetry, nor make Youtube videos; they are too busy surviving. So are people in places where material scarcity reigns supreme. My father, who never wanted to leave his homeland, is dying at home, and my mother won't hire a nurse not for lack of money, but because she doesn't trust that young people will work for just the money and won't rob them blind.

We have the knowledge, the technology and the means to live in domes in the vast deserts of this planet, to go to the moon or to live in space habitats anywhere in the solar system.
This looks amazing! Love the design.
Huh, that's odd that it got changed. I can't think of any valid case where [no option] checked is part of a set of radio buttons. The user must be presented by a default, their entire reason for existing as is that one of them is checked all of the time.

Microsoft's Windows guidelines implicitly says that one option must always be checked: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/win32/uxguide/ctrl...

> If none of the options is a valid choice, add another option to reflect this choice, such as None or Does not apply.
So all we need then is parachutes, some kind of GPS based glide guidance control, and a network of aviation battery collection stations :)

I guess overseas flights will just have to absorb the cost, unless it happens to be economical somehow to operate floating stations for the purpose of collecting dropped batteries.
Thanks for sharing. I'm not a student of the RE art so just curious about what you just said -- by saying VM did you mean the whole SC8 is running some core code inside a VM (of course within the same executable)? I assume that the intermediate code is definitely not public so people like you have to RE all those stuffs too?
Or just as is often the case a garage.
Then they can start cracking down on the problem if it becomes widespread. But not when it isn't.

When the punishment far exceeds the loss caused by the "crime" then it is absolutely unfair, it undermines the rule of law itself.

Just being arrested over it could be considered punishment itself. Especially if it's a young person who gets into trouble, it is traumatic for them. It is also sending the message that the system itself is unjust, and he/she might not think twice before committing a real crime, e.g. real theft or fraud when he/she grows up.
No, they did not.

They promised that they were going to start using a manufacturing technique called dry electrode coating, and they have done that.
So why not use a check box?
Which part? I'm moving to Nice soon and wondering how it will be. Many of my friends still don't have AC.
You don't actually need to use Local:Address:A as a source to connect to Local:Address:B, you can connect from Global:Address:A.

To make it more specific: if you advertise both 2001:db8:1::/64 and fd00::/64 as on-link on your network, a host can connect from 2001:db8:1::a to fd00::b, and fd00::b can reply to 2001:db8::a. Because both ranges are on-link, all communication is on-link and is never sent to the router. (This is just the normal behavior for on-link ranges.)
Mostly HPE Aruba whenever we could, the last model I was involved with testing was the AP 510 4x4 Wi-Fi 6. On the client side the Intel AX200 was the last I was involved in testing for devices we controlled but, being a hospital, tons of old devices came with what they had and we just had to make it work. We even had a WEP SSID (with a crapload of isolation and firewalling) because there were devices hardcoded to a certain WEP network with no WPA* support too expensive to replace. That said, it was also a world of mergers and divestitures so we supported just about every brand at some point since we couldn't justify going in and ripping the existing Wi-Fi out day 1 unless it was truly disastrously designed.

As far happenings to APs I'd say 90% of the time it was one of two classics on infinite repeat:

- (Particularly after a new install) "This AP near my work desk and I've been having headaches ever since" -> "We'll try turning it off, let us know if things stayed the same or got worse" -> we actually turn the LEDs off and leave the Wi-Fi on at first -> They mostly never follow up, if we do they say things are great. There were a few occasions they'd follow up and we'd really turn the AP off but it never resulted in anyone being able to tell when the AP was on or off without us telling them (or a few who knew enough to check the RSSI near the AP of course). The "happening to the AP part" was there were sometimes people would just take them down (you just need a ladder and then spin it unless you put every AP in offices in an enclosure) the AP as the first step and then we'd get outage alerts thinking it had just died.

- (Particularly by maintenance crew, presumably since they had the ladders and comfort level in taking things apart during work) we get an alert that an AP in a warehouse/break/hidden-office-cubby/etc area is down so send someone out -> arrive and maintenance person says the Wi-Fi has been bad today -> See the AP is not physically there, ask where they put it -> "Oh you mean this? I thought they were putting up a security camera to watch me work".

Neither of these things were particularly common at the individual level but when you have 36,000 you refresh every 5 years somehow it becomes something that happens somewhere every week. The other 10% is boring stuff, APs being ripped off by someone pushing a tall cart down the hall, someone decorating the APs with aluminum foil to make the hall look like it has disco balls, water/sewage leaks taking out a ceiling of APs because someone broke a toilet. For the most part these were extremely rare and I don't really blame people often ('cept the toilet one). E.g. you've got a bunch of old patients and try to make a disco hall, you're a good person - just know that'll kill your and the patient's Wi-Fi or you're just trying to get shit to where it's supposed to be and you stacked it on this thing too high - don't blame ya for being in a rush but keep safety #1 it could have easily been a different accident having stuff that high rushing down the hall.
What are some realistic, self hosted mitigation strategies for defending against these attacks?
> the user agents for these attacks mention Mozlila/5.0

The linked write up on why is interesting, finds attacks for many of the same files, and recommends blocking the user agent.
perhaps not terribly relevant to this case, but i remember some videos making the rounds over discord that would crash the app. i think in the end it wasn't malicious, but its not unreasonable to worry that if a video file can cause an app to crash, then what else can it do?
Why is there no opioid crisis in Europe ?
With all the performance enhancements it touted, I really thought Fuschia would be the perfect home for WesrOS hardware, but it seems that'll never happen.
The idea of someone going to a bank with a garbage bag full of cash and depositing it into a pharmacy's business account is insane. That's the kind of thing that can only happen when the system is fundamentally corrupt.
Alternative hypothesis: he is lying about usage.
The author says they aren’t a security person, so to correct a minor thing: the first examples are credential and configuration discovery, not directory traversal. The latter, to the best of my knowledge, is reserved for techniques where the attacker “escapes” the webroot or otherwise convinces the server to serve things outside of its normal directories.
Logitech MX Mechanical Keyboard Sound
An element should do one thing, not two.
Story of how the US became the biggest exporter of liquefied natural gas
but fr though schnitzel with spaetzl is delicious; highly recommend!
>But maybe I just don’t understand your country well enough?

You really don't. You live in a country that is either 11 million or 6 million people with fully enforceable border controls and immigration controls. You can control who comes into you country. You can control the goods that come into your country. Your population rivals one of the larger metropolitan areas of the USA.

Problems don't scale linearly. At 6 million people you can afford to fund pensions through nothing but an oil extracting operation out of your country. 7.7% Unemployment at 11 million people is, believe it or not, much less debilitating than 4% unemployment at 332 million people. There are more unemployed persons than the entire population of Sweden. And these populations cluster, and they depress local economies, and they drain their local workforce and social services. Then crime happens, and populations move, and housing prices fluctuate, and then this spreads. But here's the trick: You only need so much space to live. So much money to eat. So much space to grow food. You only have so many hours in the day you can work. Any doctor can see 20 patients a day, spending 30 minutes on each consultation. You don't need that many doctors to meet that demand at 6 million people. You need a lot more doctors to meet that demand at 332 million. Costs and living standards are relatively fixed beyond a tolerable level of comfort. Scandinavian countries achieved this comfort. But this comfort doesn't scale. Because problems don't scale linearly.

Back to borders and immigration: You control your borders. You can say that drugs don't enter your country. And they won't (at scale, at least). In the USA that's not enforceable because the country is so large. Illinois can say that they ban guns. But that doesn't stop them from going to Indiana and getting them. Or Kentucky. Or Missouri. Your local change can only accomplish so much when you are against the tide of your neighbors. You can say that you want to control your borders. But your neighbors disagree. So they go around you controls and infiltrate your economy anyway. And you don't know how bad it really is. Because statistics are an approximation of a segment of a population that doesn't want to be tracked. But these people still get sick. And some costs are fixed. So your publicly funded hospitals still need money to cover their costs by people who will flee and not pay. So you privatize and offset the burden on the patient. Because people can pay for themselves to get a blood test. You relieve your burden on the system, for the moment. But now companies charge more because they also know that certain costs are fixed and people are willing to tolerate more costs for a relatively inexpensive service. And of course, they optimize. Because there's nothing stopping them. Since you can't tell them not to do something when you can't solve the problem yourself. And here we are.
It's called an Obfuscation Virtual Machine running custom opcodes. These opcodes were decoded in a special way and a single x86 instruction like

mov imm, reg

would get translated in 20-30 instructions most of them junk, but they were not laid out contiguously, you would execute one junk instruction and then return to the dispatcher to get to the next one, if I remember correctly. This made the VM and tracing dog slow.
Additionally it used a small 256 or 1024 byte scratch buffer for the virtual registers that held data. I've forgotten now how it was exactly.

The entire VM used only jmp instructions which was how you would spot it.
k: War on Raze
Simple. Get hit by lightning.
I love anki, I've used it from everything to Japanese to my college lectures, but my only issue is that it's UI/UX is a bit subpar, there's quite a learning curve to figure out all the little bits and details of the program, and it's easy to waste your time tweaking flashcard layout settings instead of actually studying.
Then again, for me, I found often times for college lectures I rarely actually used the flashcards in traditional anki format - I found the act of cultivating all my notes, homework, organizing questions, creating layouts, creating the flashcards - that alone was 50% of the review that I needed to study the material.
Prediction Intervals for Random Forests
Scientists Just Discovered a New Type of Magnetism
You Can Now Play Doom on Dogecoin as Developer Adds Iconic Game to Network
This link works better for me.

https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/the-plot-against-e...
You are right. Americans will be fine. We’ve got enough money to fortify cities from rising waters. Well maybe not some poor areas. But we’ve never cared about the poors, so they can suffer.

The border will be where the American crisis exists. Droughts will cause the poor and hungry to flee their homes. We’ll see a refugee crisis at the border that makes today look tiny.

Oh and refugee crisis’ that are left unsolved lead to criminal activities. So we are likely to see a resurgence of ISIS. If we are really unlucky we’ll see a few strong men take over power in these countries. Combine both and we’ll have regional conflicts. Maybe some of those will bleed over to terrorism in the US.

But yeh, you are right for Americans it isn’t an existential crisis. For millions of others however it will be.
He should have used Vim instead of memorizing it's keybindings. That makes no sense at all.
90 minutes is a very big ask if you want to be consistent. Maybe you're simply trying to bite off more than you can chew? I think consistency is king, so whatever you have to do to stay consistent will pay dividends, even if that means shaving your working set down to just 10 minutes a day.
RowHammer is not a thing of the past. In fact, modern DRAM chips are significantly more susceptible to RowHammer due to their increased chip density [1].

[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.13121
I use UNIX desktop daily since 19 years and its great.

Details:

- https://vermaden.wordpress.com/freebsd-desktop/
I believe the intent matters. If you need a fence and you’re not trying to use the electricity then it is not theft. If your intent is to consume the power then it is theft.

Doing this kind of power harvesting off transmission lines is a standard Electric Power university course exam question for intro to transmission lines courses.
Contemplating Simultaneous Thinking, God and Logos
Solar panels on the outside of the plane? They're above the clouds for the most part.
The best interpretation: Create health specialists for managing and treating addicts so that they can still live productive lives.

You're advocating for Portugal's model, but note that it's subject to economics and politics (see https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/is-portugals-dru...), while the withdrawal symptoms are not.

I think a two-prong approach is necessary and I worry about the perverse incentive of healthcare specialists or medication experts wanting to maintain a pool of addicts long-term.

I had an informal debate with a former roommate--and to help him along the above was the one counterargument I thought of and I still don't have a good solution. Opiods are in a class of their own.
If the current generation of "AI" can replace someone they either have low-value skills, or the employer just wants an excuse to let them go. Certain fields face immediate or imminent risk from current technology: transcription and translation as another person commented, summarizing documents, customer service, for example.

The layoffs in tech that started last year are driven mainly by pandemic over-hiring and interest rates, along with a lot of greed and terrible management. ChatGPT et al. have little to nothing to do with it.

In my field, programming, the output from LLMs works best to generate more technical debt and maybe to train and guide the least-experienced people, who always get cut first anyway when employers look to reduce headcount.

If your programming skills amount to copy & paste or wiring up front-end frameworks, you should improve your skills. If AI doesn't replace those people $10/hr outsourcing will.
You say this because you are not familiar with Wave (formerly known as Sendwave). It's one of the biggest startups in Africa. Working there is a big deal
VCs Are Leaving Their Firms but It's the Founders They Backed Who Often Get Hurt
In no particular order

Jade Empire

Fallout 2

Pathfinder: Kingmaker

Neverwinter Nights

Divinity Original Sin (1, not 2)

Dragon Age: Origins

I was hesitant to share my own picks because I feel that it's only inviting criticism, but I decided to assume good faith and trust that you are genuinely curious and not just looking for ammunition to nitpick me.

I will freely admit that most of these don't have the most incredible stories either. But they are all CRPGs I enjoyed vastly more than Baldur's Gate 3.
That's what we get for letting Lars Løkke destroy our health system for over two decades. Remember that the US way was the explicit goal of Fogh's government. Venstre is sister parties with the Democrates after all. Our issues are just underscoring the dangers of privatization, new public management, and liberalism.
There should be severe consequences for attempting to damage valuable cultural artifacts. Even if they weren’t successful.
You're free to dislike the book, but I can't really follow your criticism. The book is clearly not "based on vibes". It's chock full of data to support the authors claims.

Now you might argue that the data either doesn't support the claims made, or you might doubt its legitimacy, but instead of providing a reason you just told me that it should be obvious why the book is nonsense. That doesn't really give me a lot to engage with and I'm not going to try to make your arguments for you.

For me the Book had its intended effect. It argues that the climate movement, as it gained mainstream popularity, also lost its ability to convey nuance in favor of projecting a strong "we are heading towards certain doom" message. This helped grow the movement, but is also responsible for a lot of young people feeling completely hopeless. That's certainly something I could heavily relate with before reading the book. The book then goes on to highlight areas where the world has made much bigger progress than I would have thought. For me this turned a feeling of intense hopelessness into one of motivation.

So was the Book meant to make me feel good? Sure. In that sense I guess you can call it a feel-good book. Were the claims unsubstantiated and "without any evidence to support" them? Certainly not.
African startups raised funding in 2023
Thanks I will look into Claude :)
Proselytizing, which is to say converting, in Christianity is seen as a positive, and to be “militantly proselytizing” is not meant as a literal “militant” but as “vigorous and active”. Christianity believes very much in exposing (and thus saving) as many souls to God as possible in a (naturally) non-violent way.

And the main way to proselytize in modern churches is via helping the less fortunate in local communities and with mission trips to third-world countries, which is certainly compelling.
I can't be bothered to search for it.
We need passive building cooling like:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S03062...

AC won't scale
I assume Microsoft will release a Surface or two with the new soc. Lenovo probably too since they released with the older qualcomm mobile SoCs. It all boils down to the actual real world performance of the new Soc, battery life etc.

Personally most software I run today would run fine on arm or it's web based so if the reviews look good I'm probably buying one.
You seem to believe that the disposed hordes will inevitable be able to burn it to the ground despite primarily being dispossessed from places with near primitive military practices, alone supplies. While we’re writing fictional tales, there’s an alternative ending to this fiction that ends with the dispossessed hordes simply losing.
Is this just a factor of how the human brain works? My wife has stage 4 cancer and one of my strategies to help my kids have more memories is to build uniqueness into our activities, so years from now they can go, do you remember that time we went to x or did y with Mom? I think the human brain is much better at recalling unique events - whether they are bad or good
I started using it in the last couple of days after reading this and I find it amazing. It's limited in the sense that it may lack templates and a lot of other things, but it's so easy to code for it, that I expect the community will make everything that is needed really quickly. I am SO impressed. I love it.
Oh I'm not so against EV, I'm just being pro-nuke as I personally always has been. Honestly I don't get why some sort of EV supremacy theory has to be defended at all costs. Those are just facts that density and recyclability of Li-ion is just atrocious. Gasoline particles tho NOx bad for health yeah I get that part.

Seriously, if we could just build 2-3 air-cooled Plutonium fission per each megalopolis core and use e-Fuel on existing hybrids we'd solve everything in modern society ever. The reactor could double as cityscale thermojet ventilation system as well, eliminating heat and atmosphere problems once and for all. It will of course work as a training exercise for coming real Space Age in which humanity builds bunches after bunches of cylindrical habitats fabricated and populated in space. The only two roadblocks towards that path are some NIMBYism/NPT fears and cost.
Update your software frequently.