skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I wrote a detailed walk-through of the illumos syscall handler back in 2016. It's missing the updates around KPTI (meltdown mitigation), but other than that the mechanisms should be unchanged.

https://zinascii.com/2016/the-illumos-syscall-handler.html
>Unless they open the immigration spigot

That's going to happen no matter what. Canada for example needs about 5 million to 10 million per year. For the foreseeable future to repair the problem. Obviously that's not even possible.

Immigration is also not free.
I think the non-capitalized ‘s’ isn’t a typo. They mean studios using Macs, not people using Mac Studios.

FTA: “DynaMouse allows you to assign a specific display to a dedicated mouse device (including the built-in mac trackpads) so that when you have multiple screens in a studio-like/complex workstation setup (and far apart from each other), you don't have to drag your mouse over to the other screen.”
I believe the Estonian government has long had at least a basic EHR that they use across their public and private medical facilities that is part of their larger e-government system

https://e-estonia.com/solutions/healthcare/e-health-records/
Yes. Capitalism has created a lot.

As the pure simple form of transactions of value. I build x, you build y, barter is inefficient, so we use money to smooth it out. Adam Smith, yada, yada, yada.

The problem is that Capitalism is not static. It is an evolving system.

Many people that are Capitalism cheer leaders are proponents of a very simplified version, that they want to 'get back to' even thought it generated Robber Barons.

As it evolves, it warps society. It forces people into constraints of decision making, across all layers. Management wants a bonus, so they push for 'cheaper at all costs', short term quarterly goals, and it warps government by buying off politicians, lobbying, and middle managers or line workers, they have kids to feed, bills to pay, they aren't fighting back/rocking the boat.

So this whole situation continues to evolve, until it reaches a breaking point.

Marx was not the only one that called this out. He is just the one everyone hates on. Even thought his work defined the word 'capitalism', and most of the more 'academic' side of his work is just doing what economist do today. What he pointed to was the end-state of the system as it grows, it's inevitable crash.

Many others besides Marx have pointed out the trend.

Nietzsche was expressly not-Marx, and also identified the same trends and end state of Capitalism.

You can find examples going back to Plato.

When wealth generation is the only drive, the society eventually collapses.
OTOH, this is not what people do in emergency situation; the modelling loop is just too slow. In emergencies people need to rely on reactions which are built through training and practice. A good modeller can often avoid the emergency situation (i.e. your ball example), but once in an emergency situation it's a reaction situation.
Probably because the two latest major versions - Ventura (13.x) and Sonoma (14.x) are not included in that list, and may not be supported. Patches to older versions may be supported. Apples patch policy according to Wikipedia:

```
Only the latest major release of macOS (currently macOS Sonoma) receives patches for all known security vulnerabilities.

The previous two releases receive some security updates, but not for all vulnerabilities known to Apple.

In 2021, Apple fixed a critical privilege escalation vulnerability in macOS Big Sur, but a fix remained unavailable for the previous release, macOS Catalina, for 234 days, until Apple was informed that the vulnerability was being used to infect the computers of people who visited Hong Kong pro-democracy websites.
```
The point is if the company RPG character is to survive itself the trust stat must be at a certain level which means statistically there's a level trust you can have in most companies otherwise they would all be dead because everyone would be DIYing everything and "efficiency of scale" or "efficiency of markets" wouldn't be a thing :)

I think we all agree it's not that simple. But ycombinator comments isn't the greatest place to debate this kind of thing either, so I apologize. I get your side too, and unfortunately I dont think either of us has the time to unravel everything lol x)

Have a great day!
Do you want to learn to program?

You need to know your own learning style, and then compare it to what a bootcamp would offer - would that work for you? Or would you need one on one coaching? Or could you just read tutorials and ask on StackOverflow? Or should you do a course somewhere? It's really a matter of what you know would drive you, personally, and then - if appropriate - finding a reasonable bootcamp and sticking with it.

Also, definitely don't assume that programming is some magic profession with Google-2020 salaries for all and very little output required - even Google isn't like that anymore. It's just a job, so you need to reflect a lot on if it's actually a job you would want to do all day for years.

On the other hand, don't over-analyse - if you decide "yes, I could do that for years" and then change your mind, that's fine too.
Sorry you missed the second part of my statement. Generalized statements are dumb. It was half satire and half serious.

Of course there are winners in all regions of the world. Most of your examples are pretty biased though. Japanese cars > German cars. China is probably more relevant to the massive cost reductions in solar panels. Europe has a high-speed train network because of its age and size. Not practical in many parts of the world but I would say China's network is much better than Europes. Maglev trains were not a German invention.

You are missing the bigger picture of my half serious side. I am not talking about specific inventions but that 1) making a generalize statement is pointless and just introduces useless strife and 2) the EU is starting to get eaten away by Chinese manufacturing and innovation. There is a balance between regulation and free markets and if I was wanting to HQ a company I am not sure I would pick the EU.
It would be great to add pre-money SAFEs / CLNs as well, as you do still see these, particularly in Europe.

And as an angel investor, it would be great to have a viewpoint to see how your investment in a company is doing. E.g. you enter how much the company has raised on SAFEs, then series a, b, etc, to see where you end up. This can be more complicated than you think, as you often see companies raise on a SAFE/CLN, then a priced round or two, then a bridge on a SAFE, then another priced round, etc.

Ta! :)
Show HN: I made a site that lets you punish yourself
> But the only way to do this is to require ID checks, effectively regulating and destroying the anonymous nature of the internet

Hopefully this will reduce amount of people using social media.
Use the good old post-it method

Remember poe : what's hidden in plain sight is never found (and nobody is looking anyway)
<3 pycharm.

That is all.
Since you think it was a dick move, then maybe consider that.

Language matters when you want to get across.
(and so does context).
A measure-theoretic version of this theorem was used by H. Furstenberg in 1977 to give an elegant proof of Szemeredi's theorem: if you have a sequence of integers of positive density, then it contains finite arithmetic progressions of all sizes. This is an example of Ramsey's principle [size => structure] of inevitable structure. The original proof by Szemeredi was combinatorial, and Furstenberg was among the first to use ergodic-theoretic methods to get theorems in arithmetic.
A typical large inquest will come up with a list of several dozen items that could have prevented or mitigated a situation, and I don't think common accidents are any different from unusual ones. Perhaps you wouldn't call all several dozen "to blame", but certainly all contributed.
If the value of the reserve money is $2b one year and it deflates to $3b the next, does that mean you can print more fiat every year? Sounds like an attractive proposition to me
I hope they remain separate companies. Google as a business will drive the value of jerbrains products to the ground
Lots of German car components are generic Bosch, just with different markup depending on whether you're looking at Skoda, VW, AUDI, BMW, MB or Porsche in that order.
Authorities Secure $2B in Bitcoin from Pirate Site Operators
Gems at FOSDEM 2024 – Opensource.net
Nice idea, tks
Marc Benioff: “Just DM me and I'll take care of it, Austen.”
It’s extremely hard to figure out whether modified software poses a security risk. I wouldn’t trust experts spending long hours to get it right, I certainly wouldn’t trust people at TÜV doing spotchecks to find the bugs.
If they still have some samples of this old, corpse-sourced hormone, perhaps they can analyse them to try isolate candidate compounds.
Prompting Diverse Ideas: Increasing AI Idea Variance [pdf]
awesome, I'll dig into this, thanks!
Why do you dismiss as men women who are just trying to live their lives in peace? Because propagandists have lied to you about the real threat: dangerous men who don't need any pretense or disguise to hurt people. Not women, cis, trans, or otherwise.
Guess I have to write a new IDE :D
Well, at least you were wide awake after that. TBF to Tesla, my Mercedes tried to kill me twice as well before I got rid of it so I'd call them about even in that respect.
"Which Voltage do i need to cut Styrofoam with a resistive wire"
A shame that they didn't release his name. Because he is from my town, and I thought I know all the hackers here in person.
Sure .. x86 is practically a RISC now! 32 GPRs, 3-address instructions, new instruction encodings ...

It won't stop the Aarch64 and RISC-V freight train though.
In pursuing quarter by quarter benefits, in fact some of it happened across only 2 years, they have set up long-term disaster that impacted their ability to design, build, and deliver - first with 7E7 (now known as Dreamliner), then with 737 MAXX series and the inability of Boeing to either take on a new venture like 757 upgrade or a new plane based on 7E7 project but in smaller class (This is, btw, big part of how A350 happened - reusing results of investment in A380).

Some things take long to build (or correct), and very short time to destroy.

And with Boeing it's more that the ongoing disaster known as MAXX took away the blinders from wider population in very... brutal and public way.
I wouldn't trust the original developers either.
The article made me think of General Kurt von Hammerstein-Equord's officer classification:
"I distinguish four types. There are clever, hardworking, stupid, and lazy officers. Usually two characteristics are combined. Some are clever and hardworking; their place is the General Staff. The next ones are stupid and lazy; they make up 90 percent of every army and are suited to routine duties. Anyone who is both clever and lazy is qualified for the highest leadership duties, because he possesses the mental clarity and strength of nerve necessary for difficult decisions. One must beware of anyone who is both stupid and hardworking; he must not be entrusted with any responsibility because he will always only cause damage."
Googled that, found the GitHub with a <h1> of

> DO NOT DOWNLOAD TRON FROM GITHUB, IT WILL NOT WORK!! YOU NEED THE ENTIRE PACKAGE FROM r/TronScript

I see later it mentions you can check some signed checksums but that doesn't inspire confidence. Very much epitomises the state of Windows tweaky utilities vs stuff you see on other platforms.
>I always tell people if you can't be fired, then you also can't be promoted to something else more interesting. If someone can take over for you that means you can go do something else.

In my experience, if you want a raise or promotion, you need a new job.

You must always be cognizant of the carrot being held out in front that you will never get.
Not to rag on New Mexico State, but I'm totally going to rag on New Mexico State -- how hard can it possibly be to "maintain" something like this? Given that the software is from the '90s, it can't possibly total more than a few gigabytes? And the bandwidth surely can't be huge. Finally, what "maintenance" is even required?

NMS surely has a large connection to the internet, so what this amounts to is one lonely machine sitting in a rack in the far back corner of a server room. Or maybe they don't have a server room -- then give the responsibility to a half dozen incoming CS freshmen.

And if that's too much trouble, hand it off to literally any other university. Someone has this, and it should have to fall to the informal role the Internet Archive is playing here.

That said, I don't know NMSU's circumstance. The whole place could be going away for all I know.
A regular CPU supports Pytorch and has lots of RAM at low price.

The problem is memory bandwidth.
I was just thinking "2013 hmmm I used to go to all the CCC's then I wonder if we bumped shoulders" hehe
Show HN: Dandori – Visualize Your Tasks
Fun fact: that's the exact same amount of illegal as regular piracy is. Just less convenient.

Edit: Could the downvoters at least leave a comment with why they think my comment isn't adding to the discussion?

Copying DVDs onto your NAS or whatnot involves breaking their encryption. However poor said encryption is, breaking it runs afoul of the DMCA.
Well, yeah.

That's why I meant the above as table stakes. They are the cost to even get in the game to get punched with bullshit IP reputation lists.

But if one doesn't have even PTR records, one has no leg to stand on complaining about blocklists.
Does not seem to fit with the previous bit of the quote:

"dynamic languages are still interesting and important. There are programs you can write which can't be typed by a particular type system but which nevertheless don't "go wrong" at runtime, which is the gold standard - don't segfault, don't add integers to characters. They're just fine."
> no “perpetrators” to harass

And just like that they lost all interest in the situation.
What does it matter? All the people who bought apartments in the middle of nowhere as an investment now want to buy the apartments in real cities => thus more demand.
The difficult part of the UK driving test is doing exactly that modelling loop. I agree with you. It's not about responding to an emergency - yes the loop would be too slow for that. It's about foreseeing the emergency before it happens. Looking ahead further down the road for things that could turn into hazards that should be prepared for ahead of time. It's credited with reducing the accident rate, though I'm not entirely sure how they worked that out.
People accept crypto all the tine. I use it to pay for servers, donate to open source projects, etc. You can buy gift cards or Visa cards if you really want with it. For coins that are liquid you can sell billions of dollars of it.
Indeed, and you'd hope that AVs would do this. Notably the car which caused the initial incident didn't do this, they hit the pedestrian then drove off!
You mean that the sound of each key is unique and sufficiently different from the others? Or it has to do with how a person is typing?
What makes Lisp (Scheme) great (for me) is that functions are first class citizens, the prefix syntax is consistent, tail call recursion optimization makes it runnable, and metaprogramming allows for powerful abstractions. What I would also emphasize is that using lambda expressions makes you wonder when to define something and when to omit the definition. Lisp is simple to learn but difficult to master.

What I would like to do is to use Lisp to solve complex problems. The problem is that abstractions are not often efficient.

For example, consider computing the calculus product rule. An S-expression abstracts the function: (lambda (u v) (* u v). With metaprogramming, this becomes a new S-expression (lambda (u v) (+ (* (d u) v) (* u (d v)))), where (d u) and (d v) further compute the derivative. To optimize this further, you need implementation dependent code and replace abstractions of S-expressions with native machine code. This is where I feel that the troubles with Lisp start.
Sure, they're not perfect. But they're still in business and their volume is as large as it ever was. The parts stores where I go have whole walls dedicated to Arduino and clones, Raspberry Pi's maybe and other stuff not at all.
Umm. lol.
I think what this work does is establish a new, and lower, upper bound on the number of points that need to be explored in order to find an exact solution.

From some of your other replies it looks to me like you're confusing that with an improved bound on the value of the solution itself.

It's a little unclear to me whether this is even a new solution algorithm, or just a better bound on the run time of an existing algorithm.

I will say I agree with you that I don't buy the reason given for the lack of practical impact. If there was a breakthrough in practical solver performance people would migrate to a new solver over time. There's either no practical impact of this work, or the follow on work to turn the mathematical insights here into a working solver just haven't been done yet.
I couldn’t answer this from the site. Will this let me run macOS Catalina on an M2 Mac Studio with usable graphics performance? Because that would give me back a bunch of 32-bit games I didn’t want to give up.
>some python and tad bit of SQL [...] so I’m entering unemployed with about 6-12 months of living expenses in the bank [...] enroll in a coding bootcamp? [...] despite costing $10k+

With limited funds as a constraint, it isn't a good idea to pay thousands for a bootcamp that doesn't have a high probability of placing you in a job.

Instead, you can save your money and learn mainstream Python/SQL/Javascript/etc for free with resources like Youtube, blogs, StackOverflow, etc. Some more tutorials that are not free but still low cost include subscriptions to Pluralsight, Lynda/LinkedinLearning, etc.

If I was hiring, I'd prefer Candidate A that used the unemployed time to self-teach from 2 months of Youtube videos and developed a few projects on Github that he/she can explain -- over Candidate B that just graduated from a 2 month bootcamp.

In addition to all the tutorials on "Youtube University" being free ... it lets you gauge your true motivation and determination on the programming topics. This self-assessment could give you more evidence to reject (or enthusiastically enroll in) a coding bootcamp.
Car accidents are taken orders of magnitude less seriously then plane accidents, it's not surprise that they released the vehicle that quickly.
Here's another blog post that got popular on HN a few years ago and explains how doing much of what this article advises (not all) will get you nowhere: https://noidea.dog/glue

I don't think either are fully right or wrong, but I thought it was interesting to see the difference of opinion.
> I know in the best of times these programs were tenuous and full of questionable promises

Screw promises.

A coding bootcamp is the best guided way, other than college, of acquiring basic knowledge and skills of a software developer. It will not guarantee that after graduating from it you will find a job; although some bootcamps may have certain arrangements. What a good bootcamp does guarantee though is that after completing it, you will have sufficient knowledge to build, say, a mildly complex website, or do some data analysis tasks. In good market conditions, this makes the graduate somewhat employable as entry-level software engineer.

There are plenty of free online resources that you can use instead. But that requires a lot of discipline; and a curriculum to know what you need to be studying.
I'm not sure where you get that from, I gave you links so [citation please]

Deaths per billion journeys:

Bus: 4.3
Rail: 20
Car: 40
Plane: 117

Every time I get on a plane I have less chance of making it than on other modes of transport, even cars. Rail and bus are much safer per trip, amount of time spent, and are in the same ballpark as flight when using the per distance travelled metric.
How hard is it to do a complete recertification. Given that these planes cost over $100 million each it seems like that probably wouldn't be a huge cost compared to the revenue that a new model of plane would generate.
I am not sure how defenseable manufacturing is alone when China has been making massive strides in the past 10 years. The whole point of this original thread is that the EU is blocking an acquisition of a failing company where no real competition exists domestically. China is eating everyones lunch in the robotic vacuum space and its a comical defense to block this purchase. I believe these policies will hurt the EU in the long run, time will tell.
On medication for ADHD, it helps in the short term, but I still struggle to commit to working on things in the long term. I either get bored or forget or find a new shiny.

My job involves static analysis and I have an interest in PLT, so I've found some papers (Abstracting Abstract Machines) that I'll read through and get a rough idea. But to truly understand things I have to implement the ideas, but the scope of what I want to do expands so fast that I get demotivated and eventually move on.

Categories for the working mathematician, Software Foundations, contributing to mathlib are all things that I sort of start working towards and cannot force myself to get to any meaningful conclusion. At the same time starting so many things is how I slowly accumulated the foundations necessary to even approach these things.

It doesn't help that I also have PDA autism, which leads any sort of structure I try to impose on myself eventually becoming too stressful. I feel like I've reached the extent that modern medicine (I'm just short of max dosage of XR Ritalin) and therapy I can afford can help me.
Platform-native webviews are the way to go, same as Apple and Microsoft use for macOS / Windows. Let the OS manage the multiplicity of instances and allow the OS vendor to optimize the webview performance.

If you require native speed, there is zero way to get there via Electron without a convoy of wagons.
Well that sounds like a false dichotomy to me.

There's always going to be some prisoners that are either too ill or considered too dangerous to be allowed to work, so how do they get charged for their stay? Also, the prisoners that have no reasonable chance of recovering their freedom are not going to have much incentive to work and what do you do when they go into arrears - put them in double prison?
The local maxima associated with machine learning/deep learning (plus hardware acceleration) led a lot of people--even before generative AI--caused a lot of people to assume broader tasks couldn't be that hard. Especially given early successes that seemed pretty impressive. At one level, the state of self-driving cars is pretty impressive. On the other hand, it's nowhere ready to take little Sally to soccer practice by itself which is what a lot of people really wanted.

At this point, even some relative skeptics like Rodney Brooks are probably looking overly optimistic in terms of timelines.

I suspect that current approaches only take us so far and some other things from cognitive science and so forth will need to be pulled in.
Not sure it'll make you feel better but the initial accident in this case was caused by a human driver.
Genes, Brains, and Individual Differences in Intelligence [video]
I don't have a citation for those being imported to China but the last decade has been a massive change and many of those precision tools have been copied in excellent quality in China now. It is only a matter of time.