skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Opioids are very marginal in Finland. There's no S*klers pushing it into the public health system.
I was going to say it read like a puff piece about a corporation that makes most of its money from legacy back catalog
Or better, use `Shamir's Secret Sharing`

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shamir%27s_secret_sharing
I don't think so, MENACE actually learned to play, this appears to be just a look up table for precomputed positions. Still impressive.
Is it a built-in feature?

I’m using modernhn.com it’s a chrome extension. It does the job but I’d be curious to try other themes
Interesting. I didn't realize that 737 MAX started after Dreamliner. That would seem to be a possible explanation.
That's why they said 'many'.
An Italian Holocaust Survivor Asks If She Has 'Lived in Vain'
That doesn't make it mandatory, though.
Even in the Unix world, it's shell-specific, but most shells tend to expand ~ out to $HOME (which in turn gets expanded to the actual path). They also have complicated rules about when ~ characters are expanded or not.
That depends on the kind of float, you can float in three different ways: emit new stock, sell existing stock, a combination of those two. Any new stock emitted will have the bulk of the funds (minus fees and all that) deposited in the company, selling existing stock will have the bulk of the funds deposited with the existing share holders.

It isn't rare for there to be a lock-up period before existing stock holders are able to sell their shares on the market to avoid people dumping stock they know is worth less than the float price. This is because there is a fair chance that those closely involved with the company have a better long term view on what the company will do than the market so it takes a while to get any post float surprises to be priced in. That's one reason why IPOs tend to be tricky to price: overprice and the stock will drop after the float and those that bought the IPO will feel burned, underprice and you're leaving money on the table.
Not disagreeing, but that's true for any political decision ever, unfortunately that includes the "sadly, none of this has been done" statement as well.

Writing the above has distilled a previously nebulous feeling: Politics is emotion, not facts.
That makes sense, but, as far as I know, the charity arm might as well be nonexistent compared to the arm that aims to get kids addicted to sugar.
But what happens when it rains resistors?
In France in 1982, the magazine Science & Vie published a cardboard computer simulator, named "Ordinapoche". It was designed by Joel de Rosnay.
Here is a cached copy in french:
https://archive.wikiwix.com/cache/index2.php?url=http%3A%2F%...

It helped me understand computers!
https://archive.is/2024.01.30-055910/https://www.nytimes.com...
Possibly.

Most semi-trucks cost about 200 000 USD. I couldn't find the value of a single truck load anywhere but there's a thread here[0] where folks are speculating it takes about 30-60 trucks to fully stock a Walmart, and a second thread where folks are talking about the likely cost to buy everything in a Walmart[1], which converges on low seven figures.

Let's maximise the truck value with these constraints, so $10M/30 = 333 333 USD.

Then we could perhaps estimate that the value of each truck is somewhere around 550 000 USD.

How many trucker hours is that? Well, let's take the number from TFA which is 110 000 USD/year, assuming an average of 10 hours per day[2] (50 hour weeks) for 50 weeks per year (even truckers need a holiday), we get a total of 2500h/year. That means that one Walmart truck is worth 12,500 trucker hours.

The 'involvement rate' for crashes resulting in injury per 100 million miles was 36 in 2021 (i.e., approx 1 every 2.7M miles).

In 12 500 hours at 45mph[2], a trucker will travel around 562 500 miles.

Wherever I've had to make an assumption, I've leaned towards it being less expensive to not have a crash (high end of value of stock in the store, low end of number of trucks, choosing to 'total' the truck in case there's an injury, etc.).

However, this very basic and unscientific examination it does seem to suggest that your immediate conclusion that the employers of truckers should be economically aligned towards protecting trucks and truckers is not supported by data.

[0]: https://www.quora.com/How-many-full-container-truck-loads-do...
[1]: https://www.quora.com/How-much-would-it-cost-to-buy-one-of-e...
[2]: https://www.dat.com/blog/benchmark-your-supply-chain-for-45-...
[3]: https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/motor-vehicle/road-users/large-t...
As far as I can tell, the whole Boeing situation is a minor and interesting case of a moral panic / groupthink episode. A flight on one of these grossly unsafe Boeing planes still seems to be safer than a daily bus commute to work (and may the heavens help those death-seeking lunatics who travel by car!).

As for why products are getting worse, the west appears to be in a multi-decade energy crisis interlinked deeply with our manufacturing processes being uncompetitive. The actions of management in manufacturing companies are being driven by the regulatory environment around energy and production.
>You have zero proof

Proof of what? I fully accept that this guy finds keto really helpful and I have made no effort to dispute that. There is a world of difference between "a thing that some people find helpful" and "an evidence-based clinical intervention".

>Just because there is no direct studies backing it up yet doesn't mean there isn't real effect.

The entire point of my comment is that the chance of there being a "real" effect (i.e. greater than placebo) is extremely low. That isn't the same as saying "this is definitely, 100% bogus".
It's a way for them to get a lump sum in cash in the coffers of the foundation, but there are some obvious drawbacks to this.
Neither China nor Russia are communist countries for very long time. Folks here with more experience can describe better than me what actual regime there is, to me it seems like some mixture of brutal capitalism and regulated markets, dictatorship of the elite, all drowning in corruption. What labels they put themselves on doesn't really matter, does it.
> You've got it the wrong way around.

I don't see how it is the wrong way around: what you are saying is that they are a for-profit, and depending on how much profit they make with their business, the foundation gets more money to "play with", right?
sad thing here is, that nuts often have mycotoxins in them, double whammy
The "run over things" is almost a feature for me. I run the Roomba a few times a week, and I need to tidy up before. Mess never builds up. It means I keep my floors clean!

The "gets stuck under furniture" is a bug. However, I don't have much furniture at Roomba height. If I did, it'd make the device useless.
Quickemu: Quickly run optimised Windows, macOS and Linux virtual machines
Unsurprisingly predicted 2 years ago: [0]

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28773122
Well, everybody around there bought the same thing, it was 100% tomatoes without any salt or basil etc. added in. The advantage of using it over fresh tomatoes is that where I live now the fresh ones tend to lose flavor in colder months.
Your link is broken. I believe you wanted to link the Apotti wiki page

https://fi.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apotti_(potilastietoj%C3%A4r...
> Also anything dealing with finding the minimum distance distances can be short circuited by keeping the shortest distance and not taking paths that exceed that.

That's the "bound" part of "branch-and-bound", so MILP-solvers already do this.

> You can also cluster points knowing you probably don't want to jump from one cluster to another multiple times.

You can incorporate heuristics into the branch-and-bound algorithm, but the goal of MILP-solvers is generally to produce an optimal solution (or at least a solution that is _provably_ within x% of optimality).

If you don't care about optimality and just want a solution that's good enough, I would implement the Christofides–Serdyukov algorithm.
Maybe we could start with this much less general principle:

Whenever the output of software is offered as evidence against you in court, you should be entitled to the source code of the software.
They used to tell stories about breadlines in Russia where there was no bread, and I think we’re getting to the point where if we had no bread because capitalism said there would be none, we’d still be waiting in line to preserve the illusion.

When the system is a farce that doesn’t reflect its own justification, the problem keeps spreading. The trash doesn’t get picked up because the Trash System is more efficient when it runs lean and mean. But, the trash doesn’t get picked up.
A tiny insignificant part which owns the commerical part.
It should be audited by professionals, but available for public reviews / additional audits.

General folks and even most devs do not have the skills to audit code.
For a sense of scale, the US has sixty times the population of Finland.

> 3,686 homeless people living alone in Finland

... corresponds to 220k in the US.

> The number of the long-term homeless was 1,133

... corresponds to 68k in the US.
How often does acquired IP rights just end up in a lawyers filing cabinet somewhere, with nobody in the acquiring company sufficiently incentivized to do something with most of it?

A lot of the time - especially with failing companies where the sale might happen at rock bottom prices, but otherwise too - the acquirer and seller may have very different ideas about which part of the transaction matters.

E.g. one company I co-founded sold off a business unit after we pivoted, and where to me at least the technology was the most worthwhile part - far better than the platform the buyer had. But to them the 6% of the userbase they were able to convert to paying users of their own service was what justified the sale price. And as much as I think the tech we sold them with the userbase was better, I get that to them - even if they agreed with my assessment, and maybe they didn't - it wasn't sufficiently better to them to justify replacing what they had and knew how to develop and knew how to operate (we sold the system, not the company, so none of our staff went with them).

Acquired IP gets used when it is the focus of the purchase, and the acquirer knows exactly what they want or need that IP for, but even then more so if it's e.g. patents rather than software. A lot of software acquirers thought they needed still end up languishing and eventually dying.

But I've seen so much IP "fade into oblivion" over the years. I'd say, I don't even know who currently owns the rights to the majority of the software I've personally developed in my career. Some would be easy to track down. Others near impossible.
> Takata air bag inflators that can explode, unleashing metal shrapnel inside cars and trucks.

So 50k vehicles are driving around with a grenade hidden in the steering wheel. And it only took Toyota 20 years to realize this.
The'd be on my list if my goal was tie in someone who will give me easy, and very visible, publicity to the process.
No, not like that:

Evergrande is in the first group here, fruitlessly producing something of no real value, as there is too much of it.

The second group are those who invested in Evergrande itself, or the housing it built.

It sucks for everyone.

It sucks for Evergrande, as sooner or later it had to go bankrupt.

It sucks for those who invested in the housing, as it's clear that if they actually tried to sell or rent out the housing they would end up with some paltry sum.

It sucks for those who invested in Evergrande, as they're going to lose money.

It suck ls for those who can't afford a place to live because of the inflated prices.

I think there are really no winners here. No middlemen filling their pockets. It was a loss for everyone.
It's curious why any FDI happened, except small amounts of speculative investment. Property rights in China have always been highly precarious. It's a huge economy but the game is arbitrary and rigged.
The commercial entity, just like every other commercial company that has stock has stockholders. That happens to be - in part - the foundation. If there are profits then the stockholders, including the foundation, get a pro-rata payout named a dividend.

But it can take a long time to make that scheme work at a level where the foundation can do what it would like to do so this IPO kind of gets a head start on those dividends, by selling some of the stock rather than to make a profit and wait they get some of that cash today, with the downside of being required to live in a glass house from now on and having somewhat reduced future dividends (assuming there are any).
Lots of states force people to work via all sorts of rules like if you don't work you don't get paroled, or it will go badly at the parole board etc. So there you have something that is not required but pretty much anyone who has a hope of getting out someday will be competing for the few jobs available.
(and they now have something to lose, providing incentive to avoid petty crime)
Then why do their complaints make it seem they are busy with it all the time?
The similarities here with Mozilla are interesting.
> Cooking the garlic from the start makes it lose all its flavour, unless you use a tonne.

Yes and no. It does lose its typical flavor but gets transformed and this new flavor is transferred onto other ingredients.

As for sauce vs tomatoes, you are probably right, but only when you have full flavor tomatoes available - and unfortunately where I live they are not that great in the winter.
Sounds like he was just trying to guarantee a mention (advertising and clout) in the subsequent TechCrunch article…
Cloudy with a chance of devboards?
> heck maybe even virtual artists that they can spin up in-house so they don't have to pay anyone: the perfect 360 artist, geeze.

Spotify would love to direct the listener just to in house AI music that does not pay royalties to the big labels ;)
Li Keqiang, China’s former premier, doesn’t even look at gdp. It’s for ‘reference only’.

https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6B527D/
All sorts of things have been long accepted as an appropriate punishment for crimes, until people said "yeah, perhaps not".

Most developed democracies have banned forced prison labour; the US is a bit of an outlier here.
Thanks, I'll try and see how much difference it makes.
Justice Department, SEC to investigate Cruise robotaxi pedestrian crash
> LLM-based music generators do what musicians do - listen to a lot of stuff and then generate their own music.

I love this analogy, because it looks so benign, while being so off.

Question: How many hours of music an LLM can listen and ingest in an hour?

Answer: Probably 10x more than a human, and will ingest it way better in one go than a human who needs 5-10x concentrated listens to completely understand what's going on at all layers.

So, in practice, an LLM can ingest 50-100x more music in unit time, when compared to a human.

"An LLM is like a musician. Just listens". Indeed, that's true, if I wince really hard, so my head hurts.

BTW, I'm all for respecting copyright, and no, AI training is not fair use, because AI is not a human who consumes reasonable amounts of information and understands and derives it in a unit time.
> But when integrated graphics push forward, it can open up possibilities for people who want to play games but can only afford a cheap desktop

Or those who play on recent handhelds. Steamdeck with integrated RDNA2 is very capable with even modern games. Sure, you can't crank it up to ultimate quality with hundreds of fps - but it's enough, and above the "cheap" level of performance.

Also, looking at geekbench results, it basically matches the M2 Max in a mbp.
You know what they say, every cloud has a silver plating.
As I say, its fairly hard to demonstrate 'live' as they delete the posts, but if it helps here's a few reports of it, and related activities:

- https://community.element14.com/products/raspberry-pi/f/foru... (lots of similar reports of weird bans)

- https://www.eevblog.com/forum/chat/raspberry-pi-forums-banne... (a few people reporting similar cases / reasons for being banned here)

- https://forums.raspberrypi.com/viewtopic.php?t=38424 (mod even confirms questioning mods will get you banned)

- https://forums.raspberrypi.com/viewtopic.php?t=78285

And somewhat unrelated to the forum, there's this https://eiara.nz/posts/2022/Dec/09/a-case-study-on-raspberry... which highlights the issues with the main person who's caused their forums and community to have such a hostile attitude towards its users. The followup interview will let you draw your own conclusions about the head of their social team... https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/chrisstokelwalker/raspb...
Also, maybe to add to that, the Dreamliner was a new design, of which apparently even considering some setbacks along the way Boeing was still capable of at that point in time.

For the 737 Max, they were very late and had to react to Airbus much better neo offering, and didn't have the time and/or money and/or capabilities to develop a new airplane, so a lot of in the end deadly compromises had to be made to somehow bypass training and security certification as much as possible using the old airframe at low cost.
For me, it was, because it was informatve and I'm tired of imprecision, terms overloading, ambiguity and indirectnesses.

Take a look at the Rust's crate.io mess, for example, where people misuse "crate" all the time.
Are you calling for a constitutional amendment, or are you trying to say that it's fine because it's in your constitution?

The trouble with quotes given in isolation, nobody knows your motivation for giving it.
They cost a lot more that hey bring in. So, no, they should be expected to receive anything, up to the point where they pay all their incarceration expenses with that salary.
Nice video.

Surprised they use contentful (was expecting them to have something more typescripty or self-hosted).

The part about using v0 is the least interesting part to me. It felt like a plug rather than a true statement of how this is impacting developer/product workflows
Seed oils like canola aren't great for health. They're fairly new to the food stream (only widely available since about 1900), heavily processed, and chock full of compounds the plant was making to protect it's seeds, many of which cause inflammation and other negative health effects. Olive oil, coconut oil, and animal fats have all been in use longer, and seem to be better for us. Avocado oil also seems to be decent, though it can be challenging to find quality unadulterated oils of any kind.
TIL - I have never used make without a Makefile! Thank you!
Call it what it is, a totally rat move placing Mercedes in risk for pure self-promotion purposes - instead of going via the vulnerability disclosure channel (first result on google when googling "mercedes security disclosure".)

I hope nobody is stupid enough to ever engage with this firm after this publicity stunt.
Nothing prevents the owner of the code to audit it themselves, but everyone else should also be able to.

I think if you release code related to important everyday things like cars, everyone who is able will want to take a look. And you never know who will think outside the box and stumble across something they can then escalate and investigate with other people who are more capable. It happens in open source all the time.
> You never see anybody who is literally too poor to afford shoes.

Not sure where you're talking about, but if you're in Strasbourg like your friend, I lived for a while in Belfort, and Strasbourg and Basel were the two biggest cities nearby.

In both of those cities, I saw significant problems with poverty, and people I'm fairly confident were too poor to afford shoes.
But then aren't they by definition not at a calorie deficit?
Very interesting. Thanks for the references. Have you released the code or pre-trained models yet or do you plan to do so at some point?
This may be true if there isn't a vulnerability disclosure program in place but there was, thus your point is completely invalid.
And even more specifically "On the Costs of Linux Syscalls on Intel processors".

I would like to see this extended to other processor families.
This link inspired me to see what bitsavers had on the 6600 and… oh my goodness:

http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/cdc/cyber/books/DesignOfAComput...

Glad I have a 6 hour flight upcoming.
> Proof that modern programming can be massively wasteful on resources

Alternatively, consider the possibility that what a smartphone does is a lot more computationally complex than you realize.

Disclaimer: I worked on smartphone chips for many years, including the Qualcomm chip that ended in Mars.
Show HN: Open-source alternative to pdf.ai, ask your pdf and other AI for docs
Simple AI assistant for documents made open source

Can be used for your docs or also for shared documents.

It is currently a part of Papermark, open source Docsend alternative for sharing docs quickly and getting analytics on each page.

Thinking on investing more time in it, and building more advanced work with many docs.

Any contributors are welcome here https://github.com/mfts/papermark
Yes was the shoulder space as I recall
> Not to say that this is what’s happening here, of course.

No SPF, DKIM, DMARC records. No PTR record for their A address.
I'm always terrified to see surgical caps and such on doctors in a hospital cafeteria. Also a nurse or surgeon wearing scrubs on public transit. Whether they're coming into work and carrying unknown filth into the facility, or leaving with deadly resistant hospital pathogens on high density transport... they're both terrible. Unless you're outpatient, don't wear scrubs to/from work. Don't be Dr Oz wearing your status on your shirt sleave for giggles while risking patients and public.
Immigrants, legal or illegal, can walk out of jobs that are bad enough. Prisoners, by the sound of things, can't refuse even when it's an option on paper… and sometimes it isn't even an option in theory.
So, many researchers don't use terms with due care.
And many article are rejected by Nature.
They're not, it's better to use keto-sticks, which you urinate on. That's what i use.
Newphew of Freud invented breakfast (:

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/nov/28/breakfa...
Unlikely != zero risk, and concentrated != isolated?
Adjusting weights based on viewing data also describes a JPEG file, if you squint. "I didn't copy a picture, I merely adjusted cosine transform weights after viewing it."

Since you asked for someone to explain: IMO you're focusing on a mechanistic explanation of how ML happens, but if you take only a step back, the resulting models are really similar to a compressed blob of the training data. At times they regurgitate the training data almost exactly. This is what most people are seeing and (IMO, rightly) calling out as blatant infringement.

Slightly different topic: I think calling it "learning" is brilliant PR, but if you survey AI experts, they'll mostly agree it's not learning in the same way a human brain learns. You and I get more legal leeway than a computer, and it'll be interesting how that works out if/when AGI becomes a thing, but we're nowhere near there yet.
What amount of packet loss were you experiencing in your setup?