skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is how Windows Remote Desktop used to work - it would forward GDI instructions to be rendered remotely.

It falls apart as UIs got richer, browsers in particular: they're entirely composited in-app and not via GDI, because GDI isn't an expressive enough interface. So you end up shipping a lot of bitmaps, and to optimize you need to compress them. You might as well compress the whole screen then.

https://www.anandtech.com/show/3972/nvidia-gtc-2010-wrapup/3
I lived in South Beach for a year. Definitely a strange place :D
I found Ryabitsev's 2019 meditation [0] about maybe using git with secure scuttlebutt interesting (though not terribly compelling). Ryabitsev's fantasy scenario involves a developer exchanging git patches for a particular project via phones, to a laptop. Because that person uses secure scuttlebutt, the bug tracking thread is part of the enabling software, rather than out of band. I am of the impression that Ryabitsev's history as mailing list manager and software patch attestation more likely informed this dalliance than typical web3 inroads.

[0] https://people.kernel.org/monsieuricon/patches-carved-into-d...
Really depends if the coins were really known/tainted. I'm sure you could find ways to mix it in intervals, in smaller amounts, that could allow you a luxurious life indefinitely. Although I have to admit I don't know how much harder it has become, as I exited crypto some 5 years ago.
I guess the point being made by that comment is, it could be an accounting / book-shifting trick.
Are you referring to IDEs? The iPad is not a productive machine. It’s for consumption. The VisionOS is for productivity which is very different from anything on iOS so I imagine it’s going to be available on it.
We should have well defined mechanisms for sunsetting and destroying data.
Is there a goal to all of the surviving and crafting in Palworld? Or is it like Rust and 7 Days To Die with a good engine but no intrinsic motivation to play?
Some could say that on a European pov, it's because it's not Chinese.
My jaw hit the floor when I learned that some cities actually apply parking minimums to redevelopment of downtown properties and not just stuff like new surburban strip malls, to the point that some projects have bought adjacent buildings and demolished them in favor of parking lots. Maybe it's true that the r/fuckcars crowd likes to throw the term "carbrain" around a little too freely, but this kind of ass-backward policy makes me think we really do suffer from a self-destructive mind virus.
What does this even mean? What is "review" in this context?
I looove learning about technology that I don't usually come into contact with.

My dad was a doctor, and subscribed to the New England Journal of Medicine. The articles were opaque ("Defective Regulation of Inflammatory Mediators in Hodgkin's Disease — Supernormal Levels of Chemotactic-Factor Inactivator"??), but the ads were marvelous. Ultracentrifuges! Gel electrophoresis! Confocal microscopes! Electrosurgial units! Blood gas analyzers! Catnip for this budding engineer.
When are we going to stop calculating BTC total value by multiplying number of BTC times what is, let's face it, a spot price. There is no way you could sell 2 billion euros worth of BTC. You can't convert them into real property.
>As a programmer myself I think most programmers are average.

I would be very surprised if that was the case, especially now that a CS degree is a requirement most programming jobs.
Back in middle school, there was MC server drama over people stealing sand from around people's houses. And every big build involved destroying some nearby island for its resources.
Does anyone have an estimation if the amount of pixels if james web would make a full 360 degree image?
The first iPhone was pretty terrible. I couldn't get my Marketing peers to take it seriously (which they came to regret).

The first Watch was awful. I love my Series 8.

Don't get me started on the first Mac...
I watched the 30 minute "AI rollout" video from JetBrains not long ago. The engineer on at about minute 20, is CTO now? also a twenty year coder there? In this video, the two technical communications people and that Cxx leader, were obviously placing a lot of emphasis on this new "AI" version .. of something that they have been doing all along.. code hints, context evaluation, code logic engine.. but with a new bravery to send all of this Back to the Servers without a choice. It seems to be like an obsession. Sending all your code details back to a central server constantly, appears to be a large change in the social contract of programming, to me. It appears that MSFT and Google, plus the phone market norms, have changed the game field back towards centralized record keeping.

For people with knowledge of political history, this is a strong warning.

My respect for the JetBrains engineering, and the skill of the technical communicators, was met with real distrust. Not for those people, but with this whole "sea change" in the ways that the Internet works.
Google used to be exactly like that up to a decade ago. Talent was considered core for the org so you would be relocated rather than cut off.

Values shifted with the focus on earnings and growth getting less impressive.
I'm not aware of any language that can't be improved by this strategy. Amazon even added SMT solving tooling around Rust, because Rust's built-in safety guarantees aren't enough.

I'd say that the added effort is minimal. The compiler spits out more errors. We think a little more carefully about how we write functions so CBMC doesn't complain. There are no silver bullets.
> The first two iPhones weren't as innovative as they make them

Yes they were. Multi-touch in particular was a revelation. Making a big screen with one physical button is a simple idea, but making it work well was the hard part that nobody else had figured out.

Those first iPhones were dog slow, sure, but they absolutely defined how smartphones work ever since.
You can argue literally anything - but it's highly doubtful that this rises to anything resembling judicial misconduct. The appeal would have to go to the US Supreme Court.

Ruling is here [https://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=359340] but this part seems instructive:

> The plan offers Musk the opportunity to secure 12 total tranches of options, each representing 1% of Tesla’s total outstanding shares as of January 21, 2018. For a tranche to vest, Tesla’s market capitalization must increase by $50 billion and Tesla must achieve either an adjusted EBITDA target or a revenue target in four consecutive fiscal quarters. With a $55.8 billion maximum value and $2.6 billion grant date fair value, the plan is the largest potential compensation opportunity ever observed in public markets by multiple orders of magnitude—250 times larger than the contemporaneous median peer compensation plan and over 33 times larger than the plan’s closest comparison, which was Musk’s prior compensation plan. This posttrial decision enters judgment for the plaintiff, finding that the compensation plan is subject to review under the entire fairness standard, the defendants bore the burden of proving that the compensation plan was fair, and they failed to meet their burden.

The lack of indepdence of the Tesla Comp. Committee was one big issue the judge found;

> The process leading to the approval of Musk’s compensation plan was deeply flawed. Musk had extensive ties with the persons tasked with negotiating on Tesla’s behalf. He had a 15-year relationship with the compensation committee chair, Ira Ehrenpreis. The other compensation committee member placed on the working group, Antonio Gracias, had business relationships with Musk dating back over 20 years, as well as the sort of personal relationship that had him vacationing with Musk’s family on a regular basis. The working group included management members who were beholden to Musk, such as General Counsel Todd Maron who was Musk’s former divorce attorney and whose admiration for Musk moved him to tears during his deposition. In fact, Maron was a primary gobetween Musk and the committee, and it is unclear on whose side Maron viewed himself. Yet many of the documents cited by the defendants as proof of a fair process were drafted by Maron.
AirPods, too.
Congrats, that's huge!
In my area (Long Island), Apple Maps works great (better than Google Maps). I hear that it falls down, in rural areas, though.

[edit]

Looks like I pissed in someone’s cereal. Didn’t mean to, but different strokes, and all that…

I was just recounting actual personal experience, which, I suppose, isn’t popular, hereabouts.

Just for context, I have been writing Apple programs, since 1986. I am totally committed to their products, and their vision (although I have no opinion, –yet– on their Vision), and have every right to be critical. Those of us that have been on the ride for that long, have seen a very bumpy road.
Yes, it's called rr. https://rr-project.org/
Do any companies truly want to hire?
I currently work for a successful but dysfunctional pre-IPO startup.

I've been searching for jobs now for almost 4 months. In that time, I've had numerous interviews and calls from small startups through big companies.

I just got my 3rd rejection after going through a full process. The process included 7(!) interviews for a Staff/Senior level position over a month and a half.

During the first recruiter calls, everyone always seems super eager to hire, but then they wait 2 weeks before scheduling the next ~4 technical interviews, and seem positive despite eventually sending rejection emails, with of course no feedback.

I'm at a loss here. I'm trying to move jobs to support my family, since the current job is very unstable (layoffs, poor management, constant reorgs). Despite trying my hardest, it doesn't seem like any company actually wants to hire.

*Are there any companies left that actually do a full process in 2 weeks? with a reasonable number of interviews? and would actually hire if a candidate met the bar?*

Maybe I'm doing something wrong. Any ideas?

(If it helps, I do Full Stack Node/TS/React/Vue and Python/Django stuff mostly and have 10 years of experience)
If you want a very small cell phone on your wrist, they are good at that. I’m nit sure what they’re good for , but they can be that.
Just wait, they will outsource to “AI agencies”.
SAFe is an atrocity. I bet most of these 'large enterprises' are doing something similar.
Plan your sprints a full 2 years in advance! No changes, gotta stick to the plan, because it's in the sprint! But we do standups!
(I know, I know, no true scotsman, but also, come on....)
Anything that could ever appear in an http transaction. Which is to say, anything. This is like asking what possible sensitive information a piece of paper might have.

If you just mean unseen info that wasn't obviously displayed right on the screen where the original user will know not to be careless with the archive of that page, the answer is still anything.
What would you consider to be a “safe” TLD? I imagine most ccTLDs are off the table, and even a lot of the gTLDs are shady, so .com/.org/.net?
it were only the PC and instruction memory that were permuted that isn't much of an issue

This is a neat idea, but you still need PC-relative jump instructions in order to have Position Independent Executables.
I agree. I use X based emacs and the protocol is efficient. The experience seems as lightweight as using a terminal, and NOT like using VNC or similar.

advantages include fonts (even different ones at the same time), menus, mouse, colors, multiple frames/windows, and more...

You can also run the graphics locally use tramp to access remote systems. I can edit config files on a remote linux-based router which basically has busybox, with all the bells and whistles.

a much better experience.
I kinda think the Pokemon games are badly designed. I haven't played the last few generations, but my experience was that it was constant grinding, exploring was tiresome because you were constantly dealing with wild pokemon and trainers, the combat isn't interesting enough to carry the game, and there is no real progression. The trainers go from being total pushovers the entire game, to suddenly being quite difficult.

When I think of Pokemon I think of feeling powerful because my starter Pokemon could defeat any team in the game on it's own - to getting to the end and suddenly needing a well rounded team. It felt like a bait and switch. "You thought you were good at this game? No! You suck! Go grind forever to level the rest of your team!"

It feels like a game of rock paper scissors grafted onto a grinding simulator. It feels like they add more Pokemon and more ways to grind, but what I would want from it is keeping the same Pokemon I grew up with and am emotionally invested in, with less grind and more ways to feel like I am Ash Ketchum.

But I'm an RPG fan, so maybe these games just aren't for me, and there's a different personality which enjoys minmaxing and novel Pokemon who are the right audience. (I really liked Pokemon Stadium.)
I just clicked on a random image and the girl has the book upside down I am laughing so hard haha thanks.
Thank you. I've been looking for this in every news story posted since the verdict.

Does anyone know where the cancelled shares go? Back to Tesla? I assume he can get a massive tax refund now?
HTTP3 uses QUIC, it's not "pure" UDP, but it's a protocol based on it

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QUIC
Foundations – modular Rust library, designed for prod-grade distributed systems
interesting quote: "A vital component of Foundations is its robust and ergonomic API for seccomp, a Linux kernel feature for syscall sandboxing. This feature enables the setting up of hooks for syscalls used by an application, allowing actions like blocking or logging. Seccomp acts as a formidable line of defense, offering an additional layer of security against threats like arbitrary code execution."
in this context, a moat is something that only you can do, and no others can copy it. If I make a product with a feature that no one can copy, then no one can take it away from me and I'll always be able to make money off of that.
Sure you can, you’ll have to do it slowly over years.
That’s really weird, because even the hololens has this feature. Multiple windows, multiple desktops is how we want to work.
It'll be a flop. Noone with a pretty face would be caught dead wearing this, and fashion trends are set by pretty people. Its creepy.
The part that touches you comes off and is personally fitted anyway, so you just don't share that.
I replaced all my task methods years ago with just entering slots into my diary. Most are early morning when no one books meetings, if the task requires time to think then I put it during the day, effectively blocking out time so I can get it done. Not perfect for everyone but for me it works. No apps needed.
Thank you for the very detailed response, it all sounds excellent and it's great to see you've been thinking these things through. I don't really know what my expectations were, but this seems like a good combination of flexible, with opinions based in real-world experience. You're right that in my second example it's unlikely to occur at scale, the bigger you get the more granular you can be in general, so I doubt that'll be an issue.
The VisionPro supports WebXR is safari

https://www.roadtovr.com/apple-vision-pro-webxr-support-safa...
It takes substantially more effort to put it on than it does to "boot up"

And while it may sound weird that putting it on is such an ordeal, keep in mind that there's a lot of inherently fiddly bits and many have compromises. Like the PSVR2 requires me to go turn the lights on, because it uses inside-out tracking which doesn't work well in a dark room. But also you have to fiddle around with the position of it, get it in a comfortable spot, wiggle it a bit so the lenses line up with your eyes as you had it last configured, etc... Then realize that you smudged the lens with your forehead so take it off and clean it and do it again but more carefully this time.
I'm a lefty through and through in my sixth decade going around the sun. Mousing with my left hand is weird. Like completely wrong. Even on a touchpad I tend to "mouse" with my right hand.
> when investigating models and evaluating interview candidates

Wow, just realized, in the future employers will mostly interview LLMs instead of people.
Even in really big companies that focus around retail or healthcare, it is really practical to shut down offices. Our medical care facilities are no longer being built out with offices in the backrooms for IT/Finance/Etc... staff. We can rent smaller spaces or do more with existing spaces by converting it into more medical facility space and run all the business and software operations via WFH. We operate in 20 states and are racing with competitors to who does this the fastest to cut costs and charge less to providers for a competitive edge
> Do you know if it is possible to host it natively without docker?

You can use Joplin with any webdav server, so self-hosting with one's own web server is possible without docker.
Can you link to some of those studies? Could use some backup for a meeting I'm having next week at my work.
Ukraine levels up the fight with drone strikes deep into Russia
> The question is, what would $3,500 of AAPL be worth 20 years from now?

It's hard to truly believe it'll continue to go up. It's already worth 3 trillion dollars, with $400B revenue in 2022 or nearly 5% of the global GDP - how much global value can it actually provide compared to literally everything else? 5%? 10%?
I saw the title and thought it was Markarian's Chain (not to be confused with Markov's Chain) but it's not.

I thought I'd share this picture I took of 19 galaxies rising over Mt. Lassen with a 500mm lens. It is stacked and tracked (separately for ground and sky) but the composition is unaltered. Many of these galaxies are 1/4 to 1/2 the size of a full moon, just too dim to see with the naked eye.

https://dheera.net/photos/calnight/#&gid=1&pid=15
Apple Maps could be improved with classic hard work on the software etc. Apple Vision Pro is against the same problems of physics and usability that other VR and AR headsets are up against. I’m leaning towards they will never be “solved”, because using a monitor and keyboard or tv and controller works really well.
I hope you like travel!
The business of check cashing
fixedf. thanks!
> don’t forget visionOS 2.0 is just 18 weeks away

Source?
I hope there is some other way but clearly I don't know it.
> My understanding is that Apple is making excuses about being slow to support WebXR.

While this is true for the desktop and iOS/iPadOS Safari, their VisionOS version of Safari comes with full WebXR support. Which was confirmed explicitly in this Apple’s tech talk[0] and by the fact that it is indeed supported in the VisionOS simulator (which has been available for quite a while already).

0. https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2023/10279/ (ctrl+f “webxr”on the transcript, as I don’t know the exact timestamps, but I confirmed by doing ctrl+f myself)
That seems extreme, why aren't those measures reasonable?

Although if we're using journeys; notice that a daily commute will clock in around 500 journeys a year. So while a Boeing 737 MAX plane flight could be called unsafe, unless someone is continuously flying around the risk is still at levels that people find acceptable.

Even for the pilots, who are flying a 737 MAX as their day job, they're still at levels of risk consistent with someone who drives around on a motercycle. I can see why they wouldn't like that and want something to be done, but we're still not at crazy levels here. This is just lower than the standards the airline industry usually works to.
I don't see that working out. I405 is often worse than I5, it is just as bottlenecked as I5 is, and there isn't much room to expand it especially when it runs right up next to the water.

I feel sorry for anyone who has to actually do that commute. It was horrible when I was living in Bothell and attending UW 30 years ago.
Yes, but when remote workers (or laptop class as some people call it) move somewhere, the need for manual jobs increase as well, because those remote workers eat burgers, fix their teeth, do landscaping, etc. Moving remote workers to cheaper areas can enable manual workers to move as well, and could lead to more even urbanization.

This is in theory, but I think that, unfortunately, most remote workers don't move and choose to stay in expensive overcrowded areas anyway.
Even if you can catch half of the 1% that you track down (hugely optimistic!), what's the point? The impact is barely perceptible, these types of changes to get caught does nothing to deter anything. And now criminals will be more careful so it will be even harder to track them down (and/or everything will shift to areas outside the US). Any wins will be temporary at best. All of this would be a colossal waste of time and effort.

The best thing that can be done is changing the system so these types of scams/extortions are much harder to pull off in the first place.
Sure, it’s not LIFO, and this churn can be a nasty way to get rid of the expensive oldsters. But as a percentage, the bigger companies are generally still well above 2020 staffing levels.
To each their own. I've heard second hand accounts for all kind of scenarios - parents regretting their decisions in their 30s, extremely happy parents, childless extremely happy couples in their 50s, and some with their regrets. That being said, even if you have 1 child to "have some fun with the little person", it's still below 2+ children a couple is supposed to have to fix the birth rate problem.
I think it would be unwise to tax away a financial ecosystem that has driven innovation for the world and funded one of the nation’s largest growth industries in exchange for marginally increasing infrastructure spending.
A city does not want drunk people crashing cars into infrastructure or murdering its inhabitants. They don't want to support injured people who are unable to work. They don't want these types of cases taking up the court's time. All this stuff costs a city money & they aren't inviting people to do it just in case they get caught (because the type of person who can't afford a cab home probably also can't afford to replace a downed traffic light).

Save the conspiracies for red light cameras or speed traps.
That's not really an issue imo, the downside is mostly just getting part of the headset gross (you don't want to use it right after someone else has sweated up a storm in there, believe me).
Short term revenue gain (2~3 years) can be all done by "optimizing" core ads businesses but that's not sustainable for a decade. The real question is how to build a longer term growth potential for Alphabet, and probably more than half of the employees are working on less certain business areas to figure it out.
I find the unity of structures here quite re-assuring. It tends to say that large spinning masses of largely undifferentiated neutrons (or whatever) become structures which reflect both their spin, and gravity, and how the neutron stew decays as it cools.

If there was only one, I'd be surprised. If we see many of more detailed forms but they tend to a common pattern, "thats physics"