skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Fennel has a form `assert-repl` which will drop into the REPL wherever, if the condition fails. For writing games you can launch the REPL in the game loop if a keyboard button is pressed. But what you can't do, that I know of, is interrupt arbitrary execution and get a Fennel REPL. You'd probably need a lua debugger of some sort for that. I'm not that familiar with that though.
Fido in the Enterprise
I'm not sure about web based service but with the API this is easily achievable by tinkering with the system message.
Very horrifying!
For what it's worth, you don't seem to be shadowbanned as far as I can tell. Your original post seems to be dead due to downvotes, but this one seems to be in a totally normal non-dead non-shadowbanned state.
Your browser is too old to work with the library. Object.hasOwn is available for 93% of users according to https://caniuse.com/mdn-javascript_builtins_object_hasown
There most be different data sets or different measurements, or categories of bonds being used. E.g. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-01-16/china-bon...

"Global investors raised their holdings of Chinese bonds for a fourth straight month, capitalizing on a lucrative currency swap strategy to continue their gradual return to the world’s second-biggest debt market.

They bought 181 billion yuan ($25 billion) of local yuan bonds on a net basis in the country’s main interbank market in December, taking their total holdings to the highest since April 2022, show Bloomberg calculations based on clearing house data."

All of this is besides the point that foreigners are buying China's bonds, as @loeg has stated. They are essentially swapping out riskier equities for the safety of bonds which is by and large what is often taught to do when the economy isn't booming, only to switch back into equities when the downward cycle is over.
The average bag contains approximately one goodwill donation's worth of clothing and a selection of used toiletries.
Hey friend, I'm so sorry you're going through that and I wish you the best of luck in your journey.

I would argue though that it's not rocket science...currently, it's a lot harder with many more unknowns. Some of the issues we face are:

- Imperfect screening tests: the (very real) risk of both false positives and false negatives

- Lack of great prognostic models: if we think a certain cancer has a 25% chance of metastasizing within 5 years and I have 4 patients in front of me, how do I know which is the one?

- How do we identify if we're actually changing the trajectory of cancer with certain treatments? If a treatment fails, is it because we didn't choose the right treatment or is it reflective of underlying aggressive disease biology?

- Mass amounts of data from new technologies: this is obviously great and has allowed us to become granular with cancer in a way we haven't been able to before. It's important to recognize that widespread next generation sequencing is something we've had for less than a decade, and we have identified a lot of risk factors with this BUT it's also raised many questions (e.g. what mutations are actually significant?).

- Being human: every individual has their own values. Some patients will hear that it's a 1% chance this will become cancer and be okay with monitoring it. Some patients hear 1% and think it's too much of a risk and want intervention.

I think, with time and more data, we will become a lot better at this. But it's really not easy.
+1 for Dark Reader. I use it to change the font on every website, darkmode _everything_, and even paid for the ios version. Fantastic plugin. Using it on brave, safari, firefox, chrome.
> What makes HN different from FB? Is it just the scale?

The userbase.
Actually it's 0.03% but the mistake is elsewhere. The correct figures are that 1.3M out of 4.36B checked bags (so 0.03%) are lost and never claimed. The infographic incorrectly states "43.6B" (should be 4.36B, to be consistent with the text that see states "4.3B").
I mean yea I can do a lot myself given it's my implementation, but I was hoping to keep our messaging code fairly generic so it'd be easy to use either RabbitMQ or Service Bus, depending on if customer wanted on-prem or hosted installation for example.
I think that's one view, but I personally own some NFT pieces that I bought directly from the artist – for me this is no different than buying a real painting, and the value IMHO is that I have clear cryptographical proof that my piece came from the artist (whose public key is known)

I don't care that much about the copyright (although this depends on the license the artist gives the piece), but I do care about provenance, and for me NFTs give me clear proof of it.

Outside of the get rich quick schemes, there are plenty of legitimate artists selling their stuff at reasonable prices.
I quite like this and am going to use it :D

One suggestion: links (including the "reply" button) in the comment section are black text, which is difficult to read against the background.
I was hoping that something would happen when the ball made it to the other side of the screen.
Those need some kind of face to face interaction.
The perceived risk of being caught is much higher.
I think it's a game of scale. Even if they are in the hole, customer acquisition and services revenue makes it worthwhile. It's a long term game.
To be the most fair, Fennel 1.4 recently released with an `assert-repl` form that opens a repl when some assertion fails, in which you can inspect local variables, etc. That's getting closer to CL.

https://git.sr.ht/~technomancy/fennel/tree/1.4.0/item/change...
I only recently learned about linear programming. I started with PuLP and Python to get a grasp. It was one of those "How did I miss this??" moments as a developer.
Mice are a good animal model for a lot of the human physiology.
Won't power plants already have connectivity though?

They have to send the power somewhere in the end anyways.
Is there anywhere to read about what CI/CD looks like for a Mars rover? Curious what a pipeline for something like that looks like and how they account for bugs, what kinds of conventions they must use to keep errors from occurring.
Damn, I love Dracula, but the links are black [1], making it hard to read. Going to revert for now. Hey Zeno if you're reading this!

[1] https://p21.p4.n0.cdn.getcloudapp.com/items/nOuJkP65/01a9da6...
Really amazing. Direct link to the video: https://youtu.be/qAlpt_XYkXI

Only 18 x 18 pixels — wow. It reminded me of the pixelated vision from the point of view of the robots from the original Westworld (1973) movie (and to think they had to jump through all manner of hoops to create that effect). With about 3000 mice you could build a 1 megapixel camera.

Amazed at how well the interpolation filtering worked to improve the image legibility.

Also, this guy reverse engineering the chip, data protocol... This guy hacks.
Seeing this opinion all over this thread. Unenforceable laws are one way to create the pretext for discriminatory enforcement.

And you have to be trolling with your second paragraph.
Does Amazon even have truck drivers? Every time I see a Prime trailer, it’s got a random company pulling it.
I love trying to pick it out, identify the key words.
Not everyone care about privacy, it's that simple.
US marshals lure fugitive killer of Texas cyclist out of hiding with yoga ad
> For Pecan, the changes have turned Autopilot into a constant nag. He said he gets dinged by an alert to pay attention if he averts his eyes to look briefly at the side-view mirror or change the radio station. Sometimes, he gets a warning when he is looking at a previous alert.

This mostly seem to only happen within the first 10 seconds of turning it on. Even glancing at your speed on the screen can trigger it. Otherwise, the threshold for the rest of the autosteer "session" seems to be 4 seconds or so looking away from the road, depending on if it thinks you're looking at your mirrors or the cars around you.

Also, "disappoints safety advocates" is barely touched on. The only quote is

> Consumer Reports, in preliminary tests, found that drivers can still circumvent some of the safety systems, including covering up an internal camera designed to monitor whether a driver is staying focused on the road.
“We don’t think that the recall, as far as what Tesla did to address these concerns, fixed the issues that we have reported on in the past,” said Kelly Funkhouser, associate director of vehicle technology at Consumer Reports’ auto test center. Consumer Reports is still evaluating the adjustments, she said.

1. I tried covering it up to test it, it didn't work. In addition, Safelite damaged my internal camera wiring harness, and for the two weeks that it was broken, autosteer was completely unavailable.

2. That quote is so vague that it's worthless. WSJ could have omitted the second part of the headline until Consumer Reports finished their evaluation of the adjustments.
If the Stackoverflow Dev Survey is to be believed, CL and Clojure devs actually make decent money.
You can try openrss by navigating to the user profile and adding openrss.org in front

https://openrss.org/www.youtube.com/@MandaloreGaming/videos
There was a non zero chance that the GOP would block the result and keep Trump in power. That is why you could still bet on that outcome after the voting results were finalized.
I remember when I was younger it was kind of fun to read stories like this, but now the smug disgusts me. One day there will be things that are considered simple and normal to some but will be strange and perplexing to us.
Anecdata: I’ve several times clicked “regenerate” and then thumbed-up the new response when nudged.
It don't have to be perfect, but it need to have some way to do spot checks.

If there is no risk involved, everyone will jump on doing it.
> I’d assume that the high sentimental value could be converted in a much higher price than its off-the-shelf value

The PR nightmare from ransoming luggage back to the rightful owner would be catastrophic. Airlines would immediately stop working with this company.
It is indeed the case that the student languages in Racket use cons only for lists. Improper lists are an extra complexity that people just learning to program don't need.
Sure, there's some radiation, and it's shielded to some extent. But 10 mm of aluminum isn't that great at radiation shielding. The big difference is that deep space missions stay in space for decades. The rovers were in space for about a year.
It wasn't always like this. GPT in early 2023, hell late 2022, was incredible. I could have it fully stimulating a Unix terminal on acid for hours, it'd never break character. It's so insanely nerfed now.
Dracula is one of the most popular IDE and text editor color schemes [1].

I'm partial to Molokai/Monokai/something-kai, though I'm not sure why different people call it by different names [2].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dracula_(color_scheme)

[2] https://github.com/sainnhe/sonokai
The solarized dark one seems good: https://github.com/superjamie/hn-solarized-dark-nice
The whole thing is pretty nuts. I'm sure most would just ignore. One of the individuals involved did something quite criminal and deeply personal to a family member, so I am genuinely looking for an answer on how to sweep for possible eves-dropping in this scenario. I have actually worked with people who have access to satellite and security product testing (not privacy filtered consumer services) and they could have motive.
We have energy labels on major appliances that help people estimate the long-term cost of ownership. Maybe this needs to be extended to printers and razors.
This isn't even remotely true. I've never once seen an emoji from it in over a year of daily use.
We can't conclude that the donor had an egg allergy. The immune system is complicated as hell, it could be the case that he had some weird protein circulating on his blood that was recognized by her immune system, and by chance this protein was structurally close enough to some egg protein that now eggs trigger an immune response on her.
Exactly. Just like I have an organization system for my clothes. That doesn't mean I have a computer controlled robot organizing my clothes. It just means socks go in the top left drawer.
I couldn't agree more. I'm not very knowledgeable on Java, but was blown away every time I looked to see the crazy amount of boilerplate to do anything. There are all these design patterns that seem to only exist because the language is so terrible. Thousands of people who aren't professional developers write millions of lines of Python each year (just a guess, but sounds right) and the vast majority just write code and don't need 50 classes in their application to do something.
noticed the same.. must be easyish perhaps to fix in an a:link somewhere in the stylus options for it? Just installed stylus and this myself so not totally sure what/where to change the color within the theme code..
They don't at all! In fact, there have been successful NFT collections that handled payments via fiat for stable pricing and used a non-custodial OAuth wallet (eg a wallet that gets uniquely linked to your google/twitter/meta login, in a secure way)

In that way, people could pay with card and obtain the NFT without ever having to deal with a crypto wallet or any cryptocurrency. But with the same distributed benefits that any other NFT has.
Lotteries are rational when you consider the entertainment value. Most lottery players dont expect to win, but as long as theres the possibility it allows them to daydream about what they would do if they did.
This discovery may change the world in unpredictable and, perhaps very big, ways. Discoveries like this put all the self-important feature / model developers that we work with in our big tech day jobs into context.
Wait - there isn’t maid service between stays?!
Are we pretending all of Asia and Africa and Australia and South America are swimming in bandwidth?
> I think issues like these will continue along the path you describe until we tie authorship to real humans and their reputation, or perhaps something else they care about, in one way or another.

I think this is attacking the problem from the wrong end. This is just increasing the penalty for spamming. (Real reputational damage.)

Why not shift the other end—increase the difficulty of spamming in the first place.

Could be as simple as charging for account creation (even if just a deposit that’s refunded after some amount of non-spam activity).

But without getting into all the baggage payments bring—don’t allow people to ping others until they’ve reached a certain “reputation” by hitting some threshold of non-spam activity? Rate limit how many people you can ping based on reputation? Limit to only users associated with the repo you’re making the MR on? Rate limit how quickly you can create MRs and comments based on reputation?

Seems like there are a lot of levers to pull here that could curtail the problem without jumping straight to tying accounts to real life IDs.
I had one and it got trapped and strangled itself regularly and ran over things and was totally useless. I pretty much wouldn't recommend those basic robot vacuums.
All these tweaks seem to lose their appeal to me pretty quickly and then I go back to the stock settings which just “feel right” somehow. Maybe it’s just habit. I also feel similarly about the 100 or more “HN but with a way slicker interface optimized for mobile,” which always seem way worse to me (not to mention they are always missing lots of features).
I fixed it to be a little less jarring (I hope).
Fair points, I say. But interfacing with C isn't a show stopper is it? Clojure can bridge to C by exposing the C library though the JNI/JNA framework.

It isn't much fun and there are certainly situations where I'd say Clojure was a poor choice for calling C/C++ libraries, but if you need to do it then it can be done.
1. Use the API
2. Use Function Calling, with detailed parameters, well named output variables describing the format of the output you want.

You'll get much, much, much better results.
Why Certificate Lifecycle Automation Matters
Going bankrupt doesn't necessarily mean going out of business. Also, as another commenter said, "letting a company fail really just means letting it sink far enough that some other acquirer will pick it up."
It makes me sad that the Wombat theme is never in the conversation for these things. I always really liked the way that one looked ever since I saw it in Emacs, but it appears that I'm in a vast minority, since a lot of people seem to prefer Dracula and Solarized.
It's mostly a marketing tactic.

People find your free product, you lock some core features behind a paywall or make the cloud offerring easier to use, so people switch from free to paid. It's a lead magnet.
Elon Musk Says Neuralink Has Implanted Brain Chip in Human
I'm not too worried about that. The slowest part of EEPROM & flash operation is erasing an already-used page - and that's not the case here.

Chips like these only have 1kB of flash - I'd be surprised if you couldn't program them in less than 100ms.
I am not a vegan, but I eat a lot of vegetables, most vegetables, if prepared correctly are delicious, there are a lot of traditional dishes in every cuisine in the world that take absolutely no animal products on their preparation and have a wonderful taste and aroma.

I see no reason to eat those franken-foods just because you're a vegan, a lot of them have strange additives to make them taste and look like animal stuff, it is simply not worth the risk to eat them IMHO.

Of course, this is a personal view point.
> Why do people write libraries for these languages and not the Lisp ones?

1. They want their names to be widely recognized, so they find a popular bandwagon to hop onto.

2. Raw numbers? More people using Python means more people trying to make libraries for Python, means more libraries remaining in the race after you eliminate the crap from people who don't know how to write libraries.

Note that Python is, by now, an old language. It wasn't instantly popular, and you wouldn't have predicted it. In, say, 1999, you had to be some GNU/Linux person to even know what Python is. It was far from obvious that, of all things, it would get so popular. That Eric Raymond article in the Linux Journal around that time probably gave it a bit of a boost.

Python definitely rode on the coattails of increasing GNU/Linux popularity, too. More people using Linux started asking questions how to script this and that, and going "gack!" at shell or perl programming. It seems Python might appeal to survivors of VisualBasic shifting gears into GNU/Linux stuff.
Guile always surprised me not because of anything LISPy, but because of its relationship with TCL

https://vanderburg.org/old_pages/Tcl/war/
Whilst absolutely bloody brilliant, I think I've had enough internet for today!
Agreed. I only used cursive until I wasn't forced to anymore. I much prefer to readability of print. I only use cursive for my signature.
"What have white men ever done for us?"

I used to work for an American company in Australia and there was definitely a push to hire female managers, to the point where they would ignore the stack of resumes they already had and actually went poaching for candidates on LinkedIn (i.e. messaging women who were not applicants in the first place, offering them an interview).

We also had a ton of nonsense from US clients asking us not to use terms like "blacklist" or "master" in our software, requiring completely useless changes to be made for compliance.
The thing is, performance management and performance review are ways to formalize promotion and firing decisions and protect the company from being dragged to court on those grounds.

The truth is, every good enough manager of a 5-10-person team knows exactly who the best and the worst single performers are. Taking them out of the picture and repeating the process, they likely sort their reports on a performance scale with quite precision.

(if you cannot do that, chances are that you are not a good enough manager)

The devil is in the detail: explaining that sorting algorithm to the reports. Most of the time, it is impossible. Moreover, it is sometimes hard to argue with the worst underperformer if they are actively pushing back. That's why corporations need a formal process.
I am one of the disappointed owners. It is incredible to see how badly this has been designed and implemented. When I use the cruise control with collision avoidance, what I’m looking for is a system that can smoothly follow the traffic without sudden jerky braking and acceleration. Instead what I get is a system that keeps accelerating until it is really close to the car in front and suddenly brakes to avoid collision. What we need is a system that estimates the speed of the vehicle in front and matches that speed. Also, maintaining fixed distance is a really bad parameter design choice. What is more effective is if it can keep 3-10 second distance away - this works for lower as well as higher speeds instead of say keeping 10ft distance that fails when there is slow moving traffic or very high speed traffic.
What is it about in person that makes people think more communication gets done? I swear it's the opposite in basically every experience I've had. When we work in ways that are better for remote things go more smoothly because we're actually communicating. Nearly every time I see people get together, less is accomplished. I attribute a lot of it to the slowdown of communication due to the inefficiency of in-person meetings. Things that could've been a few quick messages end up requiring everyone to stop what they're doing and wait.
The name is bad and the name is everything in tech. I thought it was some answers.com AI spinoff. This is far too generic and a google search of it is a nightmare. You don't buy your books on books.com, you buy them on amazon.com, you don't buy your pet supplies on pets.com, you buy them on chewy.com.
You're talking about something different - Java the language is a bit ugly, but this is about JVM performance (ie, the runtime virtual machine that is installed to execute Java programs) with Clojure, where there is not much boilerplate to speak of.

Although the JVM is one of the sleekest environments around though and I'm confused by the fellow saying it is "viscerally slow". Clojure loads slowly, but after that everything happens at speed.
FAO: Food Price Monitoring and Analysis – Domestic Price Warnings
The software itself is pretty good, you can see that they put enough work on making something more than just a chromium skin. It's a optimized version of chromium that runs pretty well, especially in Windows. And they implemented very cool features, such as their vertical tabs, which I believe to have its best implementation compared to other chromium browsers, their sidebar which enables you pin sites on it, and its side by side mode, which is something that I would love to become a standard features in browsers.

I think people are getting too cared away on things such as "open-source" or "it invades my privacy", or some weird deep hatred for Microsoft aspect, when most people don't care with that. It's not even a parameter for them to judge if a browser is bad or not, because they simply do not care. So you have to see the situation through the average people's eyes.

I don't use Microsoft Edge, but I'm not some radical free-software absolutist either, I'm capable to see that most people don't care with that and make a fair observation about a piece of software. If you are worry with privacy/open-sourceness, there is Firefox, there is LibreWolf, etc...
oh you mean like hacker news?
I always remember that a U.S. nickel (5 cents) weighs 5 grams.

That's cool.