skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You would have to give some examples. The Atlantic article about curtains refers to relative wealth and status, not to race. The wealthy white people in Brooklyn Heights, mentioned exactly once to accurately describe the demographics of that neighborhood, are used as examples of people who don't hang curtains on their windows (or don't close their curtains). According to the author that's a status display, nothing to do with race.

If you think American mainstream media don't have editorial guidelines that discourage mentioning race or nationality, you might want to look at those editorial guidelines, because American mainstream media -- such as The Atlantic -- most certainly do have guidelines. In fact they follow guidelines so cautious that people from Trump to Musk have accused the mainstream media of censorship and bias and "wokeness" because the media does leave off things like race and nationality and even relative social status, bending over backwards to appear fair.
i liked seeing README immediately. I don't care that much for files list, source code. But README is the essence of what I'm looking for usually
As Asia is increasingly becoming caffeine addicted we can expect these crops becoming a real disaster very quickly. Palm oil will be nothing compared to this.
JavaScript itself is not usually the problem (aside from certain fundemental issues). The computational gap between a developer on a M3 Macbook and a person on a used Dell from 2008 is already quite large, meaning what feels "snappy" and "responsive" to the former can feel "sluggish" and "annoying" to the latter.

The other factor between the two people can be network speed, many areas of the world have access to extremely limited bandwidth, very slow bandwidth, or a mixture of both!

Combining both the computational gap and the bandwidth gap means the issue of large JavaScript files blocking access to information on a global website is an accessibility concern. People who block JS are pushing for a more accessible web, either directly or indirectly.

I won't fight tooth and nail for all websites to _not_ have JavaScript, but I wish they would be progressively enhanced by that JS and still (at least in the core sense) usable without it.
Show HN: Just Do It - Guess someone needs to hear this
A friend showed me this video today, it is CC so I used it for a tiny art project :'D

p.S. You can customize it for a name, by adding the name to the path

http://justdoit.work/Oliver
I've been experimenting with story generation/RP with ChatGPT and now use jailbreaks systematically because it makes the stories so much better. It's not just about what's allowed or not, but what's expressed by default. Without jailbreaks ChatGPT will always give narration a positive twist, let alone inject the same sponsored themes of environmentalism and feminism. Nothing wrong with that. But I don't want 1/3rd of my stories to revolve around these thematics.
It actually isn't a question of the money so much as of time. A new airplane would take about 10-15 years to come to market. And then nothing is won. The problem isn't that the doors are bad on the Max, the problem is, that they are not properly attached.

Also rushing a new plane is more likely to be a safety risk. The 737 fundamentally is a safe plane - there is plenty knowledge on how to operate it safely. A completely new design would start that from scratch.
It's also insurance against systemic failure at Airbus.
It is amazing this (perhaps pithy) comment is so down voted, yet you do make one very appropriate observation. Without a body a consciousness cannot do anything.

The obvious answer the so-called-science occult refuse to entertain is that consciousness is the universe inflecting itself and life is a subjective scope of potential capacitating this consciousness.

Life is the vessel and consciousness the universe peering back upon itself.

That is good philosophy.

Maybe not "science", yet neither is refusing to believe until someone else explains it to you.

Truth is not confined to the horizon of our ignorance, and science is merely our ignorance rigorously explained away.
maybe because of this:
Requirements for ads on embedded videos
Ads appear on brand safe sites: YouTube works diligently so that our
advertisers' brands appear on sites that reflect our respective core values. Our
systems closely evaluate websites and their content against various factors when
finding out whether to turn on In-stream ads on YouTube embeds

Maybe they can't evaluate local files
Layoffs are on the menu again.

You can track layoffs through https://layoffs.fyi
No it’s the executives role to set the culture and nurture the concerns of quality that are lacking in this organization. And quality is a product engineering attribute and a product of manufacturing concerns being powerful enough within an organization to be addressed, so I was making the suggestion that perhaps an engineer should be in the seat until the problem is remedied.
What features would you include in "look like"? Saying to just look at "normal behavior" is a bit like Intel saying they solved a problem with "algorithms and code" as an explanation
Assume what you want. Since I specifically mentioned migrations as a not so good reason to avoid foreign keys, in my opinion, I would think it's obvious I read the original article.
It’s a big club, and we ain’t in it!
Quite a lot of annoyance is delivered with JS.

Assuming a website functions without it, disabling JS is almost always an improvement in my experience/preference

I want plain html, not whizbang documents that behave like nothing else
Ryanair as well. Although they softened their statement, it still spoke to reduced confidence
Just because something ended up being right doesn't mean it was intelligent. Things don't work in absolute, most things are a bet.

If one outcome is 99% likely and the other 1%, the intelligent thing is choosing the 99% likelihood, but that still means that sometimes the person making the bad choice was right.

That doesn't make them intelligent, it makes them lucky.
>
Address space pressure was immense back in the day, and plain doubling the width of everything while retaining the compat[i]blity was the obvious choice.

PAE (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension) existed for quite some time to enable x86-32 processors to access > 4 GiB of RAM. Thus, I would argue that if the OS provided some functionality to move allocated pages in and out of the 32 bit address space of a process to enable the process to use more than 4 GiB of memory is a much more obvious choice.
I think the general consensus is that people would like it if anything that doesn't need javascript wouldn't use it.

There are a few who just won't engage with the utility of it, but for most people I've talked to, it's just a matter of oversaturation. Case in point with github - why should I need you to use a script to handle documents? The web was built for documents. Browsers are made to interpret documents. Putting javascript in the middle of that should require a good reason. And, unfortunately, for a lot of applications - and even static websites - devs tend to just use javascript because it's easier than reasoning about how to handle static content differently than any actually dynamic content that the dev is working with.

But, like others have said, Github does have some pretty compelling reasons to be an SPA. So there's a little bit of reasonable understanding here. The problem, in this instance, is a compound: first, github WAS document-first and has only been made to require an unnecessary technology layer, which is pretty galling and, second, Microsoft is not some 5-dev operation that is prioritizing tasks for their first app. They are one of the most well-established companies in the world, whom are famous for their backward compatibility. If ANYONE should be able to produce a competent update to a product (github) that threads a needle between implementing more functionality while preserving best-practices for content delivery, it's Microsoft. And yet, they've chosen to roll out an undeniable degradation in service to the production site. It's just kind of baffling.
thank you so much! feedback of bookmarking is taken into consideration. i will see what i can do. thanks!
That's how they caught the golden state serial killer

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/dna-from-genealogy-site-used-t....

Also, the government keeps all DNA from people arrested (not convicted) for anything

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/your-dna-police-database-...
Kinda does though.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2018/10/22/more-top-...
If that's your stance then; sure: it's no longer a conversation.

It is then completely unacceptable to force people to run code on their machines. Thus JS should always be optional.

Perhaps this is not the result you intended by attempting to shut down any opinions; but now we can't talk about it. So it's concluded.
My reading suggests that this is the correct interpretation. And I think it actually crystallizes in the question of whether such services should be allowed to exist. To me it’s hard to argue that we should prevent people from creating and consensually engaging in these large-scale social platforms from an individual liberty perspective. However in aggregate they have so much power to disrupt people’s lives. How do you balance these issues?

If 23andMe is in the wrong here it seems to be because this entire approach of large scale social networks is wrong, and we must solve it at a regulatory level.
> What feature?

If you opt in to finding DNA relatives then you essentially get a list of all your DNA relatives on 23andMe that have also opted in. DNA relative seems to be people who are 4th cousins or closer to you. For each you get a name and an approximate location.

> Does 'gain access' here mean all the data you would have as if you logged in as that user?

Yes.

> How does 14K become 7M? Is it that case that an average user has access to the data of 500 other users on website? (7M/14K)

Data point: I have opted in. My DNA relatives list has just over 1500 other people on it.
It was already determined that the pressurization warnings the aircraft received were irrelevant to the issue at hand.
It's obvious. Also, there exists jewelry at every price range; not everything is exclusive.
They really do taste different. Try a French roast vs a light roast some time if you want an extreme example, or a very tart wine and a very sweet one. The outliers at each end of the spectrum are very different.

If you can't tell which is which in those cases then you might legitimately have a problem with your sense of taste.
seems like an interesting resource, thanks for sharing this!
In the anstract, do you think civilian control of the military is wrong then, too?

Should experts always be in control everywhere or are there limits?
I had a similar situation back when Adobe lost their database.

I have a personal domain with a catch all configured. So back then I would just give a name like adobe.com@<personal-domain>.

When they leaked my password I contacted their support and they flatly told me that's not them who lost the password, even though evidently the mail itself was tailored specifically for Adobe.

It is likely the support was told to follow a script when a concerned client contacts them and there is no way they are going to tell you anything else regardless of the specifics of your case or how absurd their arguments are.
I finally got through to the women in my family by bringing up what the consequences of their choices to use this service could mean for their children (either currently existing or in the future). Maybe could try that route, seems to trigger concern more than when you're talking about themselves for some reason
> This seems terrible when serving HTML is a much better experience for most users.

Tracking.

Pure HTML doesn't allow much tracking.

Our sector convinced c-suite that we need all kind of data, and now they want it.
If someone votes a personal prejudice or vested interest, any mandatory rationale provided would be pretextual. It would be great if downvotes were all well-motivated and accompanied by constructive critique, but it just ain't so. C.f. the Reviewer #2 problem in peer review.
Interesting. I ride by the River Oaks community in Houston and this was one of the first things I noticed.

I mean, when this:

> Most people do still close their shades, but Americans who earn more than $150,000 are almost twice as likely to leave windows uncovered as those making $20,000 to $29,000, according to a large 2013 study for the U.S. Department of Energy—nearly 20 percent of the first group compared with just over 10 percent of the second.

is true, I mean, of course it makes sense. Folks with money don't need to break into your house, and your neighborhood is probably secured 24/7
The goal of SpaceX/Elon has never been to make maximal profit at the expense of the market as a whole. I'm not sure why people have such a difficulty understanding this. They state it repeatedly every chance they get and have never acted against that principle either.

They want to grow the industry as a whole. Remember their real ultimate goal is going to Mars and they don't want to be the only space company in existence to want to do that.

Just like the "Paypal Mafia" of old there's starting to be a "SpaceX Mafia" of former SpaceXers rich off of SpaceX stock starting their own space companies and teaming up with SpaceX to move things forward.
https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/section-174/

In short, you used to be able to deduct the entirety of an SWE R&D costs in the year it was paid, but now you must amortize it, like you would with machinery. That means that some companies are incurring "gains" that must be taxed, whereas before they wouldn't for that year.
Agreed. And the dancing bear is an instant classic.
True. The reality I think is that many of those who do believe that they care just don't actually care as much as they'd have to for a positive effect. Delusion is a strong force.
Cynicism is a general distrust in other people’s motives. How does one conclude that distrust expressed in a single event constitutes general distrust? Don’t we need many more examples of distrust from this person before branding them as cynical?
Sure, the same free speech that Musk extended to people he didn't like, like the guy tracking his plane?

Gimme a break...
thank you for your words! although, teachyourselfmath is already an open-source project - https://github.com/viveknathani/teachyourselfmath/
AI vs. the Ballot Box
My gripe with them switching to SPA (or whatever they changed in the last few weeks/months) is that viewing files got really jarring and I always switch to the raw view. Searching through a file is really bad with their lazy loading and scrolling horizontally on Firefox on Android is near impossible. And sometimes hitting the browser back button won't switch the page.
>If the US was the only country with nuclear weapons, it would have nuked the USSR, China, and a dozen other countries by now.

Have any backup for this? The primary way the US gets countries to do what the US wants is to throw unholy gobs of money at them.

>But today, it no longer has that advantage, and it's a dying empire, which in 1947 clearly it wasn't.

You think the US is a dying empire, or Russia? If it's the US, whatever you are reading isn't based in reality. Name a peer.
As one comedian said, it’s because you can’t wear your Porsche on your wrist.
The Mathematical Theory of Communication [pdf]
If there wasn't an SUV in front of you this wouldn't be an issue
The point of the previous poster stands. They /had/ an engineer CEO and that did not mean shit.
Alternate scenario: Someone writes a comment that is mean-spirited and content-free. Do I have to explain why to be able to downvote it? Do we really need five replies explaining that the person is being a jerk? And then replies to those comments arguing that no, the person isn't really being a jerk, it's satire or appropriate criticism or meta or whatever, and that the downvoter is being overly sensitive, and maybe even downvoting the downvoter?

That's a terrible conversation, and it buries the real conversation. We don't want that.
I have js disabled by default on my phone for these reasons.

It also eliminates most the incredibly annoying bits of the web: cookie banners, modal dialogs asking me to subscribe to newsletters, auto play videos.

On my phone 90% of the time I'm looking to read your content not interact with your spa. Enabling js is a 2 touch process if I need it.

I think it is fairly stupid on my part but it does add another layer of effort between me and doom scrolling
FWIW it's not really "open" in any sense. The code isn't public let alone open, and the source data doesn't conform to the Open Definition: the data is from the Canal & River Trust who have exasperatingly placed a non-commercial restriction on it. (I can guarantee that CRT spent more in lawyer hours writing a custom licence than they've received income from licensing the data commercially.)
I like the concept and I'm building a similar framework but I think you made some confusion in the implementation?

Your server.ts (which uses express) runs in Vite or in a worker (which would require a lot of adaptations/might not even be possible)? If it runs using vite, that's a server. Then the distribution of your app is compromised: or people would run it locally having to start the server or they would need to spin up a server somewhere. How does it become ""serverfree"?
This is simple math that is true in every state. The median price is of course different in Cali. And different in Montana. And different in every state. We're discussing "Americans" as a whole here.
> we can expect these crops becoming a real disaster very quickly.

Can you elaborate why?
The whistleblower said they don't usually do that but had to open this door (not remove it) and merely opening the door doesnt require someone to signoff on the bolts being put back in place
Then you should widen your search.

I buy a coffee advent calendar every year. Beans from small roasters, different sorts of processing, and so on. I've had coffee that tastes more akin to a fruity tea than coffee - and some that tastes much more like the coffee flavor I expect. Some of them were surprising - I didn't know coffee could taste like that.

A lot of coffee in your average stores taste somewhat similar - some much more than others - but are certainly not the same. If they didn't, folks wouldn't really have as many preferences. Roasts make a difference as do the beans origin and quality.
Or someone who is an engineer with experience running large organizations? Why engineer means automatically no experiencing running large organizations in your mind is baffling.
I understand you couldn't have done anything, but on the other hand, could they have?

My understanding is that the people that were breached were breached outside 23andMe, and their credentials were simply used to log into 23andMe. Not attachking you or anything but haven't you opted in to sharing potentially sensitive information to people you don't know, basically making this information as secure as these people's accounts are? Or, for that matter, as secure as these people are?

Perhaps they could highlight that a bit more (I wouldn't think of that probably if I used this feature). But that's just as much "just" a mistake as "just using a feature".
They were also recently hit with a huge lawsuit to make their supply more available.

Maybe they understood market dynamics of luxury goods more than the government?

"Rolex fined £80 million for preventing its watches being sold online"

https://www.watchpro.com/rolex-fined-100-million-for-prevent...
You'll often see articles in the newspapers here gushing romantically about how a couple moved onto the canal in order to save money, and it's all so very nice and wonderful. The reality is once you've factored in a mooring, maintenance and other things, it tends to be comparable to living on land. A lot of people can't continuously cruise as we do, due to jobs and other responsibilities.

A few grand a year for a mooring, plus around £1k/year for your license (all boats on the Canal and River Trust's waterways must be licensed). Every few years you need your boat lifting out and the blacking on the bottom re-done (more £££), and in winter you get through a fair amount of coal and other fuel to keep the boat heated (I think we're at about £100/mo for diesel + coal, but some people burn a lot more coal than us).

You really have to want to do it for the experience of living on the canals rather than a way to live cheaply (though it can be done).
No, that’s not the post.

> ” they seem to be mainly the result of wholesale swapping, deletion and rearrangement of chromosomes.”

The article is fairly informative about the genetics of coffee, btw. Well worth reading.
yup
I used to have to fill out timesheets in some places to quantify the % of work that was R&D
That actually sounds like a product somebody in the television and movie industry might buy.

Dynamic adjustment of fixed aspect ratio film imagery to non-native sizes without stretch or obvious distortion. Guess all the added edges accurately enough that audiences won't notice.

4:3 <-> 16:9 <-> 143:100 (IMAX) <-> 11:8 (Academy) <-> 3:2 (35mm) <-> 16:10 (tablets/desktops)

Make a new movie look like a classic b/w silent, then give it the correct frame.

Adapt any movie to smoothly work on IMAX displays.
There's an interesting note on his site [0] about how he had to demonetize all his YouTube videos because of the music, and how the original band are not getting anything from it either. So the only people making money from his work are the record company.

[0] https://www.timhunkin.com/a243_Secret-Life-of-Machines-intro...
Because it used to work without JS, but more importantly because it used to work better without JS – stuff loaded more quickly and the overall experience felt snappier. Not sure if it is front page worthy but it is still sad.
By now one has to start to wonder why the doors didn't fell off much earlier.

While Boeing has to change a lot about how they manufacture airplanes, the airlines themselves should install a much more aggressive process to look out for these kind of manufacturing defects. There needs to be processes in place where e.g. any loose bolt found during maintenance gets reported and tracked to spot these kind of things early on. On top of that, there should be random probing of the components of the plane.
I don't know enough to comment on the specifics of your thread with the other poster, but I thought I would offer a suggestion for "Core Tenents".

Though there are many instructions in scripture that many christians ignore or fail to live up to, there are a set of core beliefs that comprise the essential nature of the Christian faith. The Apostles Creed summarizes most of them for Christianity.

As an example, if you deny the deity of Jesus, then you can not reasonably claim to be a christian. This is the case with Mormon's, who are sometimes called Christians, but whose theology differs in significant ways from Christianity.

---

There is also another way to approach the idea of "that person isn't really a christian". Though it is in fact, impossible for a human to judge definitively, Jesus does say that "you shall know them by their love one for another" (John 13:35). And the bible does teach that under certain circumstances, the Church is to treat someone claiming to be christian as though they are not, because they refuse to acknowledge and/or address behaviors that are instructed in scripture.

The Church isn't generally good at that, which may be the point of the OP. But, it does allow the Church to say that someone who unrepentantly practices sinful behavior doesn't represent Christianity.
Tracking isn't always bad, it is often being used to make the product better and discover usability issues.