skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> 'Wealthy tech entrepreneurs including Elon Musk SAID they were going to be transparent but now aren't'

The article doesn't say that. It says they launched OpenAI to be transparent but now it isn't. Maybe your "they" is ambiguous, does it refer to OpenAI or wealthy entrepreneurs including Musk?

In the article the they isn't ambiguous, but it says something different overall:

>Wealthy tech entrepreneurs including Elon Musk launched OpenAI in 2015 as a nonprofit research lab that they said would involve society and the public in the development of powerful AI, unlike Google and other giant tech companies working behind closed doors. In line with that spirit, OpenAI’s reports to US tax authorities have from its founding said that any member of the public can review copies of its governing documents, financial statements, and conflict of interest rules.

They refers to the entrepreneurs, but it says they said OpenAI would be transparent. In your rewording they presumably refers to the entrepreneurs, but now you make it sound like it says the entrepreneurs now aren't transparent, rather than OpenAI.
Given this, it's interesting that an established company like Meta releases open source models. Just the other day Zuck mentioned an upcoming open source model being trained with a tremendous amount of GPU-power.
You mean, like this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJ79CdUMfVA

Also, not exactly the same type or rendering, but basically word for word what you wrote: the full-screen fully animated parts appear to be "a set of frames rendered out and stitched together to make an animated sequence"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o59LrpzGUaE
Decentralized Protocol for Open-source developers to be rewarded for their work
Never greet a Jack on the plane.
UDP-Lite
I also suspect a different is when I invoke lychee, I'm running it on ALL of the *.html files output by my static site generator. Perhaps Bernard is only testing a single page?

If I only run lychee on the same single page, the numbers are closer:

> 76 Total (in 1s) 73 OK 0 Errors 2 Excluded
This law firm made a handy chart for determining owner liability for harms caused by a stolen vehicle: https://www.mwl-law.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/OWNER-LIA...

>"Please explain how that liability would work in the context of products liability.

First ask yourself the threshold question: What is a product? A product is not your FOSS on GitHub. "

I think that a court could easily determine a FOSS contributor was liable if they knew of a way in which the use of their software could cause harm to a user or 'victim' of the software. I am not sure the word 'product' does any work here.
That's scary convincible to a lot of folks.
It's not quite a match to what you're looking for, but I think Nyxt's long-term plan is to build something similar (essentially, be a Common Lisp environment for a browser window in the same way that Emacs is an lisp environment for a text editor).

https://nyxt.atlas.engineer/
> Good developer experience increases self-reported productivity.

So do ineffective DX, most times. There's "proper" way to assess productivity gains that don't rely on subjective self-reporting (eg the DORA metrics). The "improving feedback loops" item on this report makes sense on that light - the other two are questionable as a direct proxy
It was well known in the industry (and, I think, obvious to anyone who knows Apple) that they filter content strongly by turn of the century standards and avoid any controversy. I wonder why he went with them.
> the only reason they got exist in the first place and got to this point, is by pitching themselves as an 'open'

What supports this? In Column B are conventionally-structured AI projects.
That’s uppercase L and H to move to bottom or top of the screen
> I've never own one

I take it even further than that. I also try to avoid going anywhere near houses that have them.
Re-usable, re-configurable missiles! :D
The botched firing of Sam Altman proves that fancy governance structures are little more than paper shields against the market.

Whatever has been written can be unwritten and if that fails, just start a new company with the same employees.
Same. I'd hope that using LSP and Copilot would not meaningfully impact insertion latency, though - I'd expect those to be fully async, in a separate thread.
How? The $100 power supply? The $150 dock?
This is probably apocryphal: early CRTs had their yoke coils wound by hand, which became a lost art as winding machines took over for volume manufacturing.
Web Components in Earnest
I think that would be a problem with VR headsets, not these 3D glasses you could put on or take off in seconds?
One big issue in developer productivity that seems less overlooked now is testing and test turnover time. I guess you could argue this falls under the responsiveness banner in the article, but that doesn't really discuss the extensiveness of testing and focuses mostly on things like review feedback.

Testing in general is great because as your corpus gets ever larger you can be more confident that just running the testsuite is sufficient to catch regressions. That’s why large projects these days often require every behavioral change or bug fix to have new tests to cover the intended behavior and additional negative tests as well (eg don’t just test the new behaviour/fix works, you have to add tests for neighboring behavior as well). For many simple fixes the time to make tests is actually greater than the time to make the fix itself because you reduce the overall development time for the entire project in doing so.

Over time that makes new development substantially easier and less worry inducing, but if you’re constantly adding new tests you get a new problem: eventually running all the tests just takes an absurd amount of time, even spread over all the cores (and depending on what your tests do it can make your computer unusable at the same time).

I recall at some point the webkit bugzilla added bots so you could queue automatic test and commit flags, so you could locally test just the subset of tests you expected to be impacted and then rely on the automated infrastructure doing the full tests prior to merging which helped there.

I vastly prefer that to "merge and rely on CI bots catching regressions" because it trivially leads to you having local checkouts that have failures and then you have to go back and forth verifying the local failures are existing in the tree, etc. In my experience that model seems much more prone to having regularly broken bots, and that breakage leads to normalization of broken bots and general distrust of local failures ("my change couldn't have caused this breakage, so it must already be broken in the tree and CI hasn't caught up")

You get similar issues with build times and there isn’t really a solution for that in the C/C++ model of compilation - if the wrong header is touched you end up in a miserable near world build misery pit, and it doesn’t seem like there’s any real solution for that yet. This feeds into the last point as well: if you get local failures but you don't have confidence that the build isn't already broken there's much less incentive to rebuild the entire tree without your changes to confirm the "impossible by your change" regression is not in fact caused by your changes.
Congrats to the Windsor team, and Front!
That was my immediate thought when I first saw the article about these. The whole 'it was probably something religious' is such a cop out and I can't believe scientists continue to push that anytime they can't explain something.
Declassification for contractors and the CIA passing disinformation to enemy intelligence are very different things.
You really do have an advantage by going for 2 first, and it's because you have gained information by doing so.

The possible choices you can make for 2 PATs are:

Kick, Kick

Kick, Attempt

Attempt, Attempt

Attempt, Kick

If you kick first, let's assume kicking is 100% successful, now your choices are:

Kick made => Attempt

Kick made => Kick again

These are both rational choices; attempting gives you a 50/50 shot to win, and kicking again sends you to OT with a 50/50 chance.

Now let's look at if you attempt first.

Attempt made => Kick

Attempt made => Attempt again (irrational!)

Attempt missed => Kick (irrational!)

Attempt missed => Attempt again

Some of these are irrational! If you made the conversion, just kick it to win by 1! This information gain helps you eliminate irrational choices, whereas if you kick first, no choices are eliminated for you.
Because prosecutions aren't happening and even shooters walk. What would you do anyway? Fine them?
I've been following Zed for quite some time now and happy to see them follow through with the OSS move.

I personally don't like for my editor to send out any kind of external requests at all, and this is actually what keeps me on vim as my main editor. I also don't like limited login options

It would be cool to have a version that's just a stripped down Zed, and if need be you can install the extra stuff as plugins.
HP CEO Says They Brick Printers That Use Third-Party Ink Because of Hackers
No way can I use a text editor that requires the hi-perf discrete gfx card. My battery just can't take it. Hope I can get all my work done in about 1.5 hours, because that's how long the 2019 16" mpb will last with the discrete card running.
Based on everything I am hearing about all the harmful uses this tech could have on society, i'm wondering if this situation is alarming enough to warrant an inquiry of some kind to determine whats going on behind the scenes.

It seems like this situation is serious enough that we cannot let this kind of work be privatized.

Not interested in entertaining all the "this is the norm" arguments, that's just an attempt at getting people to normalize this behavior.

Does anyone know if the Center of AI Safety acting for the public good and is this on their radar?
Honestly, there should be tension and arguing there. For example, Google should (IMO) very clearly be treated as selling products in the cases of Android and Chrome despite the fact that these technically are related to open source projects.

I’m quite glad they aren’t ignoring the complexity.
The videotape scene is here[0], but the buttered toast scene must be from a different show. I re-watched recently and they don't that demonstration in TSLoM.

[0] https://youtu.be/g1JlUcFKm5o?t=536
For anyone who prefer consuming video content to text, here's a recorded livestream of engineers from DataStax and Langchain breaking down this app in detail:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNPB8jKcxuk
(I only read the pdf outline)

As someone who is neither a Common Lisp nor a JVM programmer, I’m genuinely curious to hear from experts whether the old trope of “JVM is slow and bloated” is even remotely true any more. Based on hearsay, the JVM often competes in language performance closer to C++, and has probably the best garbage collectors in the world as well as the best developer and operational tooling. How much do other platform developers leave on the table by ignoring the JVM these days?

As an aside, even the trope about us running out of energy, or energy usage directly corresponding to planetary destruction is becoming less and less true. With solar PVs and the sun, we truly do have a shot at a future with limitless energy and resources.
> > Capitalism has uses other than consensus as well.

> False

You're making the word "consensus" do too much work on its lonesome.
There are competitions for all sorts of retro computer and game console platforms which are "purer" in the sense that there's little to no operating system at all, so the demo has to be programmed against the bare metal. That's not feasible for modern PCs though, you need the OS infrastructure and drivers to abstract over the variety of hardware.

Or if you're web-inclined you could use the browser as your OS:

https://0b5vr.com/domain/domain.html / https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2COWeeEqTs

https://fms-cat.github.io/condition/pages / https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=co42e8ErbaY
> people will still know who we're talking about

Sure? It’s like the folks who write $MSFT instead of Microsoft. I know what they mean. But it’s going to cheapen their argument for anyone who doesn’t already agree with them.
At D.E. Shaw, Larry Summers worked just one day a week (2009)
Which GUI editors don't allow you to hide toolbars and widgets? Or is it the defaults that appeal to you?
It’s an interesting division, and the wiki rabbit hole is fascinating.

It doesn’t appear the system has been very effective in recent years, compared to other approaches internationally, unfortunately.
My parents had a 3D TV. It was a huge problem. You probably don't realize how often you look away from your TV when you're watching your TV.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transit_police#

With a very narrow space and scope.
Now I wonder what's the typing lag of 10xeditor, compared to Zed...
Is there some evidence of that?
Again, you're way, way outside the context of products liability, but from your cite...

> The majority common law rule among the 50 states is that the owner of a stolen vehicle will not be held liable for damages when the vehicle is stolen and then
involved in an accident that causes injury or property damage.

This is a list of states which have varied from the majority common law rule!

If a state creates a statute which says you can be fined for selling ice cream on Sundays, guess what? If your fear is the feds, like these states, may do something crazy when writing the statute, that may be a legit fear. But that doesn't have anything to do with what are traditional common law tort principles, or with the content of the article.

> I think that a court could easily determine a FOSS contributor was liable if they knew of a way in which the use of their software could cause harm to a user or 'victim' of the software.

You think? I suppose you can think anything you wish. But you're going to need to show your work. Like -- here are the elements of a product liability tort. Here, is how the facts apply to those elements. Conclusion, liability could result.

> I am not sure the word 'product' does any work here.

It does all the work I need it to do? Your core problem is a "product" must be sold. Your/our FOSS is not sold unless you/we sell it. If some ridiculous goofball takes my FOSS and puts it in a product, and there is a problem, that's his problem because he made it a product and sold it, not mine.
I wodner if that is possible. It seems sort of a boil-the-ocean technique though.

Is what you want really to make the cargo less valuable in comparison to the wealth of the people near its route?

I suspect that even with full employment, there will still be theft.

I think even in really decent societies like japan, there are still homeless people, and also the yakuza.
I feel like we're so deep in the thread - where after people have time and time again disproven the original comments message about how being 12 years old is some magic cut-off point to language learning - there are now people who just keep adding different requirements, leading this conversation nowhere and making the new point unfalsifiable and - by extension - unscientific; whereas the original comment had an allure of having a modicum of scientific rigor behind it (which, in the end, was disproven)
Evaluation tool for LLMs in prod to find out which is best to use
Building a tool that can evaluate LLMs for your use case, and give you metrics to make the best decision on which one to pick.

Just join the waitlist and when it's ready ill get in touch!
Yes. An equally far fetched stance would be that a Social Consciousness villain might come along and start killing people who aren't organ donors, for being selfish.
> What were you worried about happening?

The point of the viewing room is that it starts and ends empty.

This contractor had stored all his equipment and tools in there. Then I had to go and mingle it with my box's contents.

What if he had discovered some drill bits were missing? I could be suspected, because I was alone in private with them, so I could have placed them in my SDB.

I asked the manager what I should do if I find someone else's belongings when I enter the viewing room. They said, that shouldn't happen: I should inform them. Yep.
Useful ISO 646 variants table [German Wikipedia]
Not sure if the description is visible, so we’re adding it in the comments too:

Hi HN, this is youphenom. A new platform created to address some shortcomings both in social networking and (professional) competitions/sports. Simply find the content you like, vote daily for your favorite team and help them win the monthly competition. Or even start your own channel/team and turn it into a winning brand with many fans.
Here are some of the problems that the platform solves for its users:

- To this day social media channels, content pages and chatrooms are like silos - each their own separate island/planet of content and interactions. The competitive element on youphenom acts like “gravity”, so these confined worlds become interconnected and influence each other.

- The rise of the Internet allowed most businesses to take what they do online - online stores for retailers, online banking for banks. But there is still no platform for the sports teams and athletes to do their business (to compete professionally) online. Now they can use youphenom.

- Before youphenom, no professional league or sport allowed the fans to score actual points for their favorite team or athlete.

- Also youphenom makes it possible for teams from different sports to compete against each other

There are many more benefits for all participants on the platform, so everyone can get more value and enhanced experience compared to what is currently available in social networking and sports.

Thank you for taking the time to check youphenom out
This is amazing, love how funny and creative the story is given the constraints! Truly impressive.

Would love to hear more technical details on how corners have been cut to shave off some bytes.
I'm cheering for any investment in making chat bot support not terrible.
I think some religious parents with gay kids have tried that line before.

Deafness is a medical issue depriving a human being of a naturally evolved sense that is critical to survival even in a stable civilized world. Denying them that sense because of identity politics is every type of wrong.
Oofda. I just pay my taxes and live my life. Whatever makes you happy, I guess.
Is replit down or having trouble for anyone else?
Small curated software and systems links
Would you feel comfortable telling a VC-funded business about your market? Or having one find you?

It's a dark forest. They see you, they covet your traction, and then they raise to outmaneuver you.

You might win, but that's a tremendous amount of stress dealing with a better-capitalized foe.
Gobby is mostly dead but still works. Win/Linux; macOS builds have gotten harder now that it's been about 3 years since the last release: https://gobby.github.io/

EDIT: It's apparently on Macports as of quite recently, though the port health for recent macOS releases looks bad.
I'm not sure that claim is correct, but could you describe what that setup looks like, and the benefits? A link to something more is also fine
Darn straight. And then colonize or subjugate any existing populations.

I think the books obliquely addressed this by having one of the major civilizations mention a comparable civilization that was its antagonist. But even so, subjugation or incorporation of other intelligent species shouldn't have been impossible.
The Streisand effect on this will be slow but sure. Epson, Cannon and Brother, your chance to capitalize and expand bulk ink/solid ink printing (consumers love understanding lower print costs upfront) expands with every article read about this.

The tide has shifted from almost free cost-subsidized inkjet and laser hardware to consumers wanting a 10 year printer they don't mind investing in upfront.
Can't you already sign up for all of the services independently? I know I can login to instagram with my fb login, but I still had to 'create' the account the first time I did. I could have just created a standalone account if I hadn't had an fb account to start with. Messenger is essentially facebook chat pushed into a separate client, which I had thought they were talking about reincorporating back into the main client, I don't really see why should allow a separate login for that.
Seems like my projects aren’t running quite right, anyone have any insight into what’s going on?
Fascinating and informative article. I'm wrestling with an unknown something that looks like it might be autoimmune, and this reads like the difference between "you're destined to a lifetime of palliative treatments" vs "there might be a something you can do to actually cure yourself". And I don't even have anything confirmed; I can't imagine what folks who actually have a confirmed autoimmune disorder must be feeling.
Is there a better way for something like an optimizing (jit) compiler? My barely informed understanding is that many of these bugs aren't soundness issues in the compilation process but instead the resulting executable code. I don't see how rust meaningfully helps with this problem.

Formal verification is often thrown around but my understanding is it can't scale to the complexity of something like an optimizing compiler.
I'm not sure why you attribute that as a shield against the market. That seemed much more like an open employee revolt. And I can't think of a governance structure that is going to stop 90% of your employees from saying, for example, we work for Sam Altman, not you idiots...
Does anyone know a good open source tool for checking broken links? I've used get/curl with scripts but it's fragile.
Hah no problem.

There was just enough time after your talk for 1 more question from the audience:

For my zshrc that you poked around in, is this issue related specifically to HISTFILE or all of the history related env vars?
If Congress doesn't get there first.
It seems like an odd framing to me. If you have a vulnerable device, you’ll need to replace it, whether or not it is actively being exploited. So, you’ve been damaged by the device producer’s negligence.
Lisp Flavoured Erlang (lfe.io) needs more love, from what I’ve seen and tried with it - it could give clojure a run for its money.
> wondering if this situation is alarming enough to warrant an inquiry of some kind to determine whats going on behind the scenes

OpenAI is making people rich and America look good, all while not doing anything obviously harmful to the public interest. They’re not a juicy target for anyone in the public sphere. If any one of those changes, OpenAI and possibly its leadership are in extremely hot water with the authorities.
> There is no way we can know if Google is lying because there's no way to check. It should be assumed that every example has been cherry-picked and post processed. It should be assumed that the data used to train the model (if one was trained at all) was illicitly acquired. We have to start from a mindset of extreme skepticism because Google now routinely makes claims that cannot be demonstrated.

This doesn't sound like a productive stance for science. You don't trust their result? It's fine to ignore all the claimed artifacts and you can just take the core idea. You don't have to assume anything malice to invalidate their so-called advertisement.

While this kind of stance might make you feeling a bit better, but will also make your claim political and slow you down if it happens to be true, given the history that many of Google's papers eventually have become a foundation of other useful technologies even though almost of all them didn't contain reproducible artifacts.
Thanks! Just tried it, but it made my skin very smooth, like it was obviously filtered. And it gave me perfect teeth. Kind of uncanny.