skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes. And the design problems was created by MBAs that decided that they want:

1) to keep the new engines that change how the plane flies

2) a convincing lie that passes minimal scrutiny that the plane flies the same - to avoid training pilots to a perfectly good new plane

3) after engineering came with the MCAS solution MBAs drove the cost down and removed redundancy - after all the whole feature was a secret so no one would demand redundancy
It'd be cool if all this metaphorical sodomy of consumers lead to hacked firmwares. Or funny, if someone ransomwares the whole company.
Yeah, you can look up a method but only if you already have the receiver’s type (which you also can’t look up by name, or by listing a package).
Your average American driver has no understanding of this and never will. There's a reason the goofball in the Tahoe XL that takes every corner at 5mph is fine with going 90mph on the highway; they truly have zero idea on how to assess the handling of a vehicle.
If we look at human history through the lense of a Dark Forest hypothesis and resource scarcity, you’d expect to see a variety of behaviors: aggression, defensive isolation, cooperation, etc.

And as on Earth, in Space, distance may help keep the peace.
You should probably read the book if you are interested. I don't think this author's summary of the Dark Forest idea is at all accurate.
I do not know why you are being downvoted. I agree that level 2 autonomy is not cutting edge - it is an option level for nearly every car manufacturer.
Curious as well

> but I got so much marketing spam that was totally irrelevant to my one and only question that I had to unsubscribe

Make sure you don't tick the "Stay up to date with Framework newsletters" checkbox, I didn't and haven't received any marketing
> I also haven't met an American that has been to a high quality of life and walkable city in the EU and didn't come back with a changed perspective on what life could be like. Once you visit places like London, Paris, Barcelona, Berlin, Amsterdam and the like and stay there for a while you rethink the suburban life.

Then you haven’t met enough people. Lots of Americans, like me, visit those cities, enjoy our visit, and come back happy to live in suburbia with our big homes and yards. Those cities are great to visit, but I wouldn’t want to try to raise a family there.
It’s easy to say that now but at the time there were obvious huge obstacles to Apple doing a great cell phone.

And not just technical; the business relationships between cellular network owners, handset manufacturers, and software companies was totally different. Apple essentially had to restructure the industry to make the iPhone what it is today.

I suspect a car would need to have a similar impact in order for Apple to succeed. They would need to launch a new kind of product that just happens to have the shape of a car.
Likely not the last round. From their numbers, it seems pretty clear that they need to become profitable.
I know they are saying they are going all in with PWAs, but native apps really are nice on mobile and it would be interesting to see an API/App story to go along with this.
If the comment meant "tall" vs "significant," then granted. I think that, as a term of architectural art, "significant" means more than tall...
The company sells induction ones: https://www.bialetti.com/it_en/moka-induction-rossa.html
Let's make a concrete example: the business dev org wants to automate some manual process to cut some cost. This will come at a controlled risk, with a business case looking like "X $ saved at Y% decrease in output quality". The problem would be much easier if Y could be easily translated to money, but for compliance-heavy domains where things like reputational damage or regulatory fines are at stake it isn't. You could model this, but then you have the same problem, just one level down: who signs off that the model is good enough?

The decision is essentially a negotiation of what X and Y are acceptable. This negotiation is always stonewalled by some compliance function who want Y to be zero. They never own the costs (nor the X benefit), so why care right? The payoff matrix then looks like this:

We do what Dev says, Dev is right (Y% decrease in quality isn't significant): we saved $X, Dev gets promotions, good job.
We do what Dev says, Dev is wrong: regulatory fines, reputational damage, big panic, some head gets cut
We do what Compliance says, compliance is right (hard to actually verify since well, you just don't do anything): saved the day from incompetence and greedy risk appetite
We do what Compliance says, compliance is wrong: cost benefit not realized, a bunch of man hours wasted down the drain, not Dev's fault though (they tried). Compliance is ok because well, better be safe than sorry right?

All of these decisions are tracked in meeting minutes, but even in retrospect: how to verify when a decision is good? You've simply never taken it and maintained the status quo.

This is a rather simplified version, but the core still holds: people who own the costs and who own the risks are put in a cage fight to negotiate with the only escalation path being to higher level decision forums that at some point can't be bothered because the Xs and Ys are too small/irrelevant for them.

The only out I've seen to this is falling back to Big4/MBB consultants, where suddenly a double standard becomes super evident. Now compliance suddenly presents a much lower bar to jump: who cares if they fuck it up: it will be their fault. The idea is that potential regulatory/reputational damage can and will be deflected onto them. After all it's part of their job and they have large enough shoulders (political connections) to see it coming, mitigate, etc.
The problem is that as long as there are attackers willing to spend resources, there is no limit to spending money on security, it is adversarial. At some point, security will cost more than what you are securing, and that's when people drop the ball and prefer to deal with the consequences.

Same ideas as with bicycles. Thieves now have sufficiently advanced tools that people stop buying the kind locks that could possibly stop them, and instead just assume that left unattended in the outside, their bike will be stolen eventually, and deal with it. For example by not having nice bikes, or by not biking unless there is a safe place for that bike.

So yeah, leaks will happen. Unless maybe you get a combination of well designed and enforced security standards, harsh penalties for cybercrime, and international collaboration.
Your assertion is wrong (because you're 100% confident about something not knowable), but what's worse, it doesn't even address the question of "Why no aliens?". If alien intelligences were abundant but just "really far away", we'd still expect to have seen them by now.
Actual legal work, as opposed to legal-adjacent tasks, will be the last to be disrupted by AI, at least so long as AI means LLM. Law is simply too complicated to rely on something that doesn't have the ability to understand.

Doc review staff will be effectively eliminated...but they're already being eliminated by non-AI technology, so AI will just be the last straw.
Why China Has Lost Interest in Hollywood Movies
OK. Now there is a compatible "next generation IPv4", nick name IPswen. For details, you may refer to this tweet?

https://twitter.com/BingSwenSun/status/1738513794933182671

What's notable is that IPswen is bidirectionally compatible with IPv4, meaning the two can interwork when the addresses are limited in the "Base Address Space" (the level 0 subspace of IPswen), much like the back and forward compatibility between color TV vs. black-and-white TV, or monophonic broadcasting vs. stereo broadcasting.

IPswen is a relatively new idea and still under development. As the history of networking and communications is replete with failures and technological disasters, it may be quite interesting to see how far it will actually go...
There's an additional aspect however: on days with e.g. freezing rain, human drivers might risk it, but companies like Waymo will probably decide to play it safe and not let their taxis run, because they know how much bad publicity an accident would be...
Why is this seemingly general rule so specific to law (being an attorney)?
If you've followed other large / individual leaks, all this data is already there. If you just want a download for convenience, go to the black forums. Or check haveibeenpwned if you're curious for your own company / identity.
Making hibernation work on Linux is the pain. Is it even possible on the Framework?
> Not even while parking. 0.5m (2ft) is about the closest you should ever drive your car to anything really.

I've lived in several US states and the law has always been to park less than a foot from the curb.
The service doesn’t need to come from the government. A marketplace of services of which I can choose my own provider would work.
Proud owner of a 20 year old HP all-in-one (1350v) which will. not. die. and prints nicely with the cheapest 3rd party ink from Amazon. Someday, maybe HP will return to its former glory of producing reliable equipment worth owning.
>The estimate for gold in the universe is 50B tons.

That is a wild underestimate. Our galaxy alone has around 100 million Earths worth of gold [1].

[1] https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/astronomers-ta...
I remember "reading" that as a kid, when I was too young to really understand the text, and thinking it was a horror story.
Anyone else think the whole idea of "tab management" tools is crazy? The way to manage tabs is to close them.
Dan's Matchbox Database
I learned yesterday about GoLang's assembler https://go.dev/doc/asm - after browsing how arrow is implemented for different languages (my experience is mainly C/C++) - https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/main/go/arrow/math - there are bunch of .S ("asm" files) and I'm still not able to comprehend how these work exactly (I guess it'll take more reading) - it seems very peculiar.

The last time I've used inlined assembly was back in Turbo/Borland Pascal, then bit in Visual Studio (32-bit), until they got disabled. Then did very little gcc with their more strict specification (while the former you had to know how the ABI worked, the latter too - but it was specced out).

Anyway - I wasn't expecting to find this in "Go" :) But I guess you can always start with .go code then produce assembly (-S) then optimize it, or find/hire someone to do it.
ISO-8859-1 is Latin-1, there's nothing specifically "Windows" about it.
> You bought some cryptographically signed number that no one wants anymore.

Much like: you bought a slip of paper that's effectively a Nancy Pelosi/Mitch McConnell's Chuck-E-Cheese token that gets conjured out of thin air to the tune of trillions whenever the next mega-omnibus fraud bill that no one even reads anymore needs to be financed.

And this is done precisely because the tax burden of all these wars and social programs would be indefensible if it they were actually levied against the voters through taxation. Even billionaires can't finance this size of govt, you could confiscate all their wealth and that only works once. So they go with the invisible tax of currency devaluation, which robs everyone in the present and kills saving which robs people in future.

Face it: every fiat currency is on a one-way trip to zero. Every currency in world history has that fate.
The mid-tier blog (probably?) doesn't depend on revenue from it for their living. Professional journalists these days often do, and are teetering on the edge of solvency as-is. And so they're a lot more vulnerable to their corporate contacts telling them, don't publish that story or slip us the name of the whistleblower, or else you'll be blackballed from our PR department. Your job will be toast, since we're your only real source, and there's 50 other journalists and publications in line to replace you.
Nobody’s hiring during that time of year.
It depends.

You need 2~3 accumulators to saturate instruction-level parallelism with a parallel sum reduction. But the compiler won't do it because it only creates those when the operation is associative, i.e. (a+b)+c = a+(b+c), which is true for integers but not for floats.

There is an escape hatch in -ffast-math.

I have extensive benches on this here: https://github.com/mratsim/laser/blob/master/benchmarks%2Ffp...
>let use that capability rather than offload everything to the cloud.

That costs battery life. With more powerful chips more time can be spent sleeping consuming minimal energy.
> I can't figure out why it's so hard to ship stuff within the EU

it's not, at least not in my experience.
That's probaby it. I don't resonate with Taylor Swift's emotional landscape so I never notice her songs when they're playing.
Cybertruck Man Bad.
Apple don't release new products until their angle on it is ready to corner the market. They are rarely first, often late, but almost always unique in quality and finish.

When they do launch the car, it's not just going to be a swanky thing to compete with BMW with a bunch of flashy touch UIs and half baked self driving.

It's going to be something that is a step change, something so far ahead of the competition they will be years ahead.

If they have deciding to delay till '28 that suggests it's both not ready, but maybe the market isn't either. If self driving is the head line feature, they will want it to actually be so far ahead of the competition it will appear like magic.

If there is truth to the article (I suspect the delay is real, un-convinced on the reasons suggested) then I don't think the will release one at all.
Self-driving cars is one of the biggest boondoggles of all time. How much money, time, effort, amd resources have been spent on this? And yet, there's barely anything to show and the end goal is still not even clear.
Is anyone at Level 5, though? At all? In even a prototype?
The assumption is that more competent hires do a better job on average. Aerospace is not an easy field, but even in much more simple jobs competence matters.
I'm pretty sure capitalism is a thing because it provides a means of legal ownership and the growth of one's exercise of power through the exploitation of that ownership. Consensus would exist due to the power of the state regardless of the economic system.
That's not an answer to my question, it's just different a wrong assertion.

To answer your new point,

Life has never once failed to become self-aware and capable of space travel in the entire history of the universe, as far as we know. What could possibly make you think it's irrational to expect it could happen again?
>the companies in China doing hardware haven't caught onto making stuff for Framework.

Don't worry. They will catch on... making and copying not just components but the entire framework. It really depends on how popular it gets.
The book posits that FTL travel exists, so it does matter.
That comment might not be entirely serious.
'Pokémon with Guns' Game Goes Viral, Angering Nintendo Loyalists
If we're going to try to "punish" SUV drivers for driving those vehicles, then I think we need to both recognize and do some things:

1) We need to recognize that there's a wide variety of vehicles in the SUV category. Many of them have replaced (not supplemented, replaced, because they sell better and car companies are hyperoptimizing their profits like everyone else) old standards like station wagons and minivans in manufacturer lineups. Most of them do not have the stupidly-high hoods that this article is actually about: those are primarily on pickup trucks.

2) We need to recognize that, at least for some SUVs, there are genuine, non-overcompensating use cases. Like driving on snowy, icy winter roads in the northern US and all of Canada.

3) Having recognized these things, we need to make sure there is provision in place for the people who have actual needs these vehicles are fulfilling—whether because they fall into the smaller category of people who would always need these things, or because they fall into the much larger category of people who would have bought a minivan or station wagon in the '80s and '90s, but most of those have gone away—before we start treating them all like the worst members of the category.

Full disclosure: I drive a Subaru Outback. I drive it for three main reasons: it's extremely reliable, it has amazing cargo capacity (which I do use regularly), and its AWD is a godsend on the roads in upstate NY in the winter. (Is it possible to drive on these roads without it? Absolutely; I drove a Toyota Corolla for over a decade. But I am much less stressed with the AWD.) I just bought my second one, after shopping around extensively to find something that would fulfill my requirements, but get better gas mileage (which, to be fair, the Outback's is actually shockingly good for an SUV).

The Outback is also basically the shape of a station wagon. It does not have an unhealthily high hood. I honestly don't know how its weight compares to other non-SUVs, but my understanding is that right now, the heaviest cars are electric cars, so using weight alone is also not a great metric.

Ultimately, I think what people like you need to do is consider this question: Are you actually trying to solve a real problem with what cars are on the road? Or are you just looking for a socially-acceptable group of people to bully and be mean to? Because your proposals sound a lot like they're aimed at the latter, and very little like they'd be effective at the former.
Yes we should. Security through obscurity is a myth
Many people, including myself can taste day and night difference from result of different grinders. You can easily verify this by variance of particle distribution of different grinders.
So much geo stuff on HN today! hallelujah
Looks pretty cool https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mogSbMD6EcY

Although, it seems it's only going to cover the first book (which makes sense, given how difficult the other two would be to film). The real magic for me was in book 3. It was inspiring to see someone think so far out, so boldly.
Interesting - this was the first thing that popped up on Google: https://www.zmescience.com/feature-post/natural-sciences/che...

But I see there's an estimate that there's more gold than that just in our Sun.
Well they said:

> People shouldn't have to work.

If people aren’t working how does anything get produced?

Maybe they mean “people should only work if they want to” but why would they if there are high taxes and prices are literally zero?

I honestly can’t follow the post.

There is apparently still a concept of money but the only source is UBI because goods and services are free. But if everything is free I’m not sure what the UBI is for or how the taxes on zero fund the UBI. It makes no sense to me.
But it helps you see car brake lights ahead through the back window of the SUV in front of you
> Apple don't release new products until their angle on it is ready to corner the market.

Like the Vision Pro?
The Internet is full of disaster stories about everything. In the actual Consumer Reports ranking Tesla is far from the bottom. It's almost exactly in the middle, between Infiniti and Cadillac.
Scaling the E2 is not the answer, but there is nothing stopping Embraer from developing a six across airframe to compete with the B737 or A320. They have the engineering talent and the supply chain network in place. They have the capital. If they see a market opening, who knows… they just may go ahead.
The article clearly states that data is stored on the device. That's the exact use case described - where people do not want any of their data stored on a server they don't control.

If that's you, and if privacy is important enough to you to want a local-only app, I think you'll find a solution to back up your data.

I don't think it's unreasonable to continue producing apps that do not require an internet connection to function and be useful.
Dialup actively co-operates with the telephone system - e.g. the screeching at the start is designed to disable echo cancellers and other such mechanisms.
> It's going to be something that is a step change, something so far ahead of the competition it will push them to be years ahead.

This is comedic writing.
I see. I guess different strokes for different folks.

For me, if my job or project is doomed, and my employer knows, I will rather they tell me immediately so I can start figuring out solutions ASAP.

It doesn’t matter if it’s the holidays. The last thing I will want is to come back from a holiday in Portugal, spirits high, year plans made, but only to be told I am fired.

But I can understand the other perspective.
I don't recall it expanding at light-speed, and the tool flattened 3D-space into 2D-space, permanently. (The implication being that eventually, the entire universe would flatten down to 2D space, since the process can't be stopped.)

And that was just one possible weapon, used by one possible species, I think?
The capability is not possible.
>Are resources really scarce?

That's the claim in the linked article.
Projection from people who never leave their basement is my favorite.
Original Apple Macintosh 128K Brochure (1984)
Show HN: Gojack
Blackjack on the command-line. Written in Go.

This is my second try at building a Go App. I would love for any Go devs to give me input on what to improve. Thanks!
Design a Technical Interview
Consider the expensive complexities of hybrids maintaining both EV and ICE systems. Perhaps investigate TCO figures and repair history before purchase. And have a look at alternatives like the Fisker Pear and extensive charging networks (some are free) available on the map of PlugShare.
>I'm so freaking confused.

I already explained my thought process as best I can. I don't know what more to do.

>The person you replied to said this exact same thing

They didn't say the same thing, to my understanding. Maybe language barrier and cultural differences mean there's a confusion here.
> The FAA has issued a new Airworthiness Directive (AD) that will allow most MAX 9s to return to service.

Contrast this few-week stint with what happened with NASA after Challenger and Columbia. Everything came to a grinding halt while questions were asked about culture and entire operating principles. And then here, we just have an airworthiness directive followed by business as usual. This is pathetic.
"Power" is the only layer enabled by default, but there are additional layers for Telecom, Oil & Gas, Water, and Solar.

Looks like openinframap has more towers, but infrapedia has some other data that's missing from openinfra.
I doubt that fees are quite covering expenses yet. I expect they'll roll out quite a bit quicker once expansion decreases their losses rather than increasing it.
BYD sells in Europe. How would they be able to do it without meeting the Euro-NCAP standards which are actually higher than global NCAP?
I'd take an XML config over a YAML one any day. This isn't to say that XML is great, but its warts are well-known, and they are generally not of the kind that makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot. Mostly the problem is that it's verbose, and to some extend, redundant.

JSON is also fine, esp. if it is JSON5 (with comments, unquoted keys, and other such minor improvements). I find that braces, brackets, and quotes don't get in the way - if anything, they make the structure clearer.
Personally, I don’t, for some (though not all) of the same reasons I don’t buy BitCoin.
Ships powered by pulse fusion reactors can certainly reach other worlds. Robust AI systems could tell us what's going on and be back in time for the year 2100.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_pulse_propulsion#Proje...
People used to get really upset about such datasets because terrorism/vandalism/etc. But eventually more sane opinions prevailed as attackers don't use this type of data - they either have insider knowledge already or just drive around to scope out targets.

DHS now publishes a ton of open datasets to help with disaster planning, emergency response, and infrastructure hardening. https://hifld-geoplatform.opendata.arcgis.com/search?collect...