skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Also they lived in a time with far less education and communication.

Newton and Leibniz discovered calculus simultaneously. If calculus were a hot new idea now, dozens or hundreds of people would be discovering it simultaneously.

Look at NN/LLM AI for an example.
I mean, it needs to be sped up, but if you sped it up, made mouse overs more informative, it can be a fast way to express large data sets.

I run a simulated football game, visualizations like this can be helpful over large datasets.
I think I know what you are looking for, but I can't find it either. I thought it was a Scott Alexander / Slate Star Codex / Astral Ten Codex article that covered the Yanomami or similar group in South America which use a nominally toxic plant as a significant part of their diet. You have to prepare it in a specific time consuming manner, and if you don't you'll eventually accumulate enough toxins that you'll die, but the timeline for poisoning is measured in years/decades, so you have to trust the advice of your elders who have passed this wisdom down through oral traditions across the ages. Young upstarts could ignore this passed down wisdom, saying "show me the evidence", (which the elders don't have) and decide to not go through the tedious preparation, and then not die after a day, or a month, or even a year's worth of consumption, but still pay the price in the end.
7B model from Snorkel tops Alpaca Eval 2.0 leaderboard
Just downloaded the habitica app, but it’s not even similar in concept or design…
Sorry, if our description does not clearly enough make sense of what youphenom is. Like any new concept it might be confusing in the beginning to exactly pinpoint what it is (initially people had hard time to grasp what the Internet is, for example).
If you have followers on the social media or you are a performer of some kind (athlete/team, celebrity chef, singer, competitive hot-dog-eater) you’d most likely benefit from our platform.
Thanks for the comment
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/5347
Isn't that what Floobits is?

https://floobits.com/
How cool. I wonder if we still do awesome things like this.
How else do you expect me to drive though puddles?
One of the top comments in Zed's post claim this performs really nicely, but I imagine it doesn't run on GNU/Linux on it's own either; it'll probably come before Zed itself, and hopfully makes a splash so I can check it out then.
> It’d sip power

Are you sure? I think Classic MacOS effectively always busy-looped (WaitNextEvent would block, but only if the OS could run another event loop), never sleeping its (single) CPU.

https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/ma...:

“The Event Manager reports a null event when your application requests an event and your application’s event stream does not contain any of the requested event types”

If that’s true, that modern node CPU would not sleep most of the time, but just loop a lot faster.
How does GPUI compare to other gui libraries?
I Think You Should Leave's 'Coffin Flop'
Flying the Block 70 F-16 'Ultimate' Viper According to Its Test Pilot
The linked paper goes into some of the more-technical details about how the multicast ad exchanges work. Very much worth a read. The number of avenues for capturing this information, legally or otherwise, is intense. Though I disagree with the conclusion of the paper that it's remotely fixable through abstract walls -- that's really just moving the goalpost.

https://www.iccl.ie/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Europes-hidde...
Experimenting with AI and Creativity: An AI Writing Competition with Cash Prizes
For what it's worth, in Kotlin you could also do the following:

val newLoc = oldLoc.run { copy(x = x * 2, y = y * 2, z = z * 2) }
Probably because no one takes it seriously if you get scammed out of $50 on youtube.
It's important to note the cost savings of declassification. Overclassification is incredibly expensive and burdensome (though it also covers the asses of a lot of incompetent bureaucrats). I used to work in the naval nuclear community. There are honestly only a handful of numbers related to the nuclear power plant on each class of ship that actually need to be classified, but every single scrap of paper associated with the program is stamped classified and it's incredibly time consuming and exhausting to work with that mess.

I remember back in school one student got called in front of the program CO and threatened with jail time for removing "classified material" from the school building after barracks inspectors found nuclear-related paperwork in the student's bedroom. (This was years before the student was assigned to an actual ship where they could learn the half dozen actually important secret numbers.) The student pointed out that they did not remove any paperwork from the school; the papers in their bedroom were printouts from wikipedia. The student was ordered in writing to not read about nuclear engineering outside of the school building, regardless of the source. Even though it's all publicly available information that is taught in any undergrad engineering program.
I call it the Grandma Test. Within reason, whatever my grandma is currently doing or capable of using on her devices is “the norm.” if she struggling to do it, then it’s not mainstream. There’s obviously exceptions to this rule, but it’s been working pretty well for me.
It depends on what do you mean by 'open-source', along with training materials and full setup? That will be hard to find. Upscaling was popular like 10 years back. That's why there is no much interest today. Training in old style isn't that hard. But artifacts are popping up in all videos I've seen.
I dunno this video seems like a pretty typical overly stylized made for TV documentary. Lots of cuts in the editing plus not discussing the actual issues in any depth. Maybe the issues presented here are real, but the narration is unreliable.
Yeah I think we agree.
I think I might not have been totally clear. If you’ve been sold a vulnerable device, you are the victim. You have to replace the device. The damage is to you, the one who did the damage is the company that sold you a defective device.

They should pay to replace the functionality, and some punitive fine, as a start. Then we can get into whatever damage their negligently designed device did (did it participate in a DDOS? Did it attack other devices on your network?)
1. Hearing isn't critical to survival in our modern world, at least in the West

2. What you mean to say is denying people the ability to regain their sense of hearing, and the medical interventions you're alluding to don't do that to the extent you're imagining. Our best approaches, cochlear implants: don't restore hearing in the way that removing earplugs would, have a large learning curve; only work on some people; and the affected person's brain usually can't be fully capable of understanding and reproducing spoken language the way a born-hearing person would. People who receive them also still rely on some amount of lip-reading, sign, and apps.

3. People who are adept with sign and familiar with the deaf community often communicate far, far easier with sign language than a hearing person communicating with a deaf/HoH person who has a cochlear implant

To what extent do you actually have knowledge and experience on the topics you're discussing?
What most (non-developer) users want is an ability to describe what they do (in non-code, natural language terms) and have a moderately intelligent system iteratively build/modify a solution for them.

From that perspective, the product is essentially constructing a mapping between NLP and available pre-built code integration points.
> And "biased towards convicting more innocent people" is bad.

How can you write that following a sentence which admits we "have no way of knowing".

We can't even say that more convictions is no fewer innocent convictions, let alone more.

Say that 1% of the accused in some jurisdiction are innocent. In that situation, the ideal conviction rate is 99%. It's possible to have a 2% conviction rate where the convictions are wrong half the time (and the acquittals are all wrong), and a 1% conviction rate where the decisions are all backwards in relation to guilt.
Hahaha I’m glad I’m not the only one. I can’t find it now, but I’m sure I’ve seen a snarky PM game here on HN before. Thought it might be the sequel
open training data, training source code & hyperparameters, model source code, weights

I'm not an FSF hippie or anything (meant that in an endearing way), but even I know if it's missing these it can't be called "open source" in the first place.
The same thing happens in photography: noise removal software removes the static but also causes the photo to lose detail. The human brain is exceptionally skilled at seeing and hearing through noise.
“Censored”? It’s still visible, and also, maybe most people just think it’s a silly assertion.
From Lord of War:

> Every faction in Africa calls themselves by these noble names - Liberation this, Patriotic that, Democratic Republic of something-or-other... I guess they can't own up to what they usually are: the Federation of Worse Oppressors Than the Last Bunch of Oppressors. Often, the most barbaric atrocities occur when both combatants proclaim themselves Freedom Fighters.
[1] OpenAI’s Nonprofit received approximately $130.5 million in total donations, which funded the Nonprofit’s operations and its initial exploratory work in deep learning, safety, and alignment.

How many of those conventionally structured AI projects existed before ChatGPT?

Maybe the donations aren't the ONLY reason, maybe they could have done a normal rounding of funding and got here, but they didn't.

I do think it's fair to say that while they got $130m in donations they needed A LOT more money, and so they need to raise somewhere, somehow. To me it's a big gray area though.

[1] https://openai.com/our-structure
I don’t want to be negative but you asked for feedback, so I’ll give you a few impressions including the superficial and quite subjective fwiw:

1. The hyperbolic claims are going to be off-putting to some. You’ve “solved” ML search? 50x better than Google scholar on a metric no one’s been benchmarking against? Consider your audience and what they would find credible.

2. The UX needs work. To give one aesthetic example, in the results there are large, brightly colored, red and green circles that are used inconsistently, and they clash the palette. This stuff can affect how sticky your service is.

3. Don’t restrict signup by email domain. This is nuts. Never add friction to gaining customer relationships. If you’re capacity constrained limit the trial. If you’re trying to segment the market there are better ways.

4. The name “Undermind”, is not working to my ear. It’s worth changing. At least find a product person whose opinion you respect and ask their take.

5. I think a lot of people here would be willing to give you useful technical feedback on the architecture and approach if more information were shared about how the service works, but I didn’t notice that was available.
It's fun, but slow. And a little frivolous since it could just be a table.
Diogenes on Excellence and How to Be Unstoppably Happy
Very neat project. Looking forward to playing around with it.
I understand the use case. I'm saying from a human collateral sense, what is the point of it?

Like we build these things and show them off, without any thought to the ramifications that they could lead to. Maybe I'm catastrophizing, but all this tech lately seems very unregulated/dangerous.
If one release a hobbyist blueprint to put an electric motor on a bicycle and then a megacorp uses that (without any due care) to release a mass-produced e-bike marketed worldwide which ends up catching fire or otherwise producing injuries due to a design flaw:

- Why should one be held liable or have a legal obligation to the customers of the megacorp?

- Why would one even be afraid of being sued by the customers of the megacorp? (other than if we lived in an otherwise draconian society)
I feel like a lot of people need to learn what a sigmoid curve is, and how only some of it "feels exponential".
The general idea behind JEP Drafts such as these is that they first focus on the semantics -- what can/should this feature do?

They save things like syntax until the very end, right before they decide to submit this as an actual JEP instead of a JEP Draft. This JEP entered the Draft stage only a few hours ago.

All that is to say -- your comment makes sense, but you are criticizing the part of this JEP Draft that is not only the least relevant to the discussion, but the thing that is most likely to change before it exits the Draft stage. Oftentimes, they even put in placeholder syntax to highlight this fact.

I'd limit criticisms of syntax until they submit this JEP for actual review.
You don't post the same URL twice with the same content therefore you maintain the logic of the API itself, so there's no spam or abuse of any kind.
Euler had scribes do a lot of the grunt work for him. His vision was quite bad and worsened throughout his life, going blind in his right eye rather early on and later developing cataracts in his left. He once joked "Now I will have fewer distractions" on his condition.
That’s the premise of self-checkouts: reduce your internal costs, increase your risk and externalize the costs of those risks to someone else.
A Single Small Map Is Enough for a Lifetime
But is not recognized by General Assembly, which means it's not recognized by UN. EU and US do not recognize Taiwan or Honk Kong as separate countries also but as part of China. That's not an opinion but a legal fact.

> Even then, Taiwan is recognized by 22 members.

Not anymore.
"Taiwan currently has formal diplomatic relations with 11 of the 193 United Nations member states.[1]"

Mostly small islands like Belize, Guatemala, Haiti etc. And that number is shrinking every year.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_relations_of_Taiwan
Clinton tried to give fake nuclear weapons designs to Iran.

Unfortunately, the nuclear scientist patsy they used, who was supposed to just deliver the designs, noticed some flaws. So he corrected them.

So they now have the real designs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Merlin
Majority of America's underground water stores are drying up, study finds
Just yesterday you were telling me in a comment that this was a selling point that they didn’t want to support these things.
> What did they lie about objectively?

I don't know if I'd put this in terms of a "lie" or not, but OpenAI's stated principles and goals are not backed up by their actions. They have mined other people's works in order to build something that they purport as being for the benefit of mankind in some way, when their actions actually indicate that they've mined other people's work in order to build something for the purpose of massively increasing their own power and wealth.

I'd have more respect for them if they were at least honest about their intentions.
Hah, not quite that bad :P
It's a very lazy ending. Very derivative of early shock animations like Bambi meets Godzilla but with less class.
It's how I do it since my workstation has way more resources.
Scientists discover the cause of the mysterious Indian Ocean gravity hole
We've adjusted it so that the CLA can now be viewed without signing in.

Sorry about that!
money not really out of your control if you have a donor advised fund or private foundation or both

my comment mentions MAGI specifically for someone like you, I’m aware this thread started off with being able to use the IRS’ free filing software and now is talking about not paying the government much or anything in taxes
What favorable tax treatment has OpenAI received?
(I havent read the other comments yet - so forgive if this is a dupe request):

May you please do the same from a hiring employee's perspective, in such a manner where, the Founding Folks can use this to understand their funding, then also understand what it means to bring on Founding Engineer, Founding Sales, etc... and then all the child departments and their impact in liquidity/stock/options RSIs etc?

And then have an ELI35 print out for the Prospectives?
This is a calculator, not a simulator. What exactly are you simulating? This takes a number of fixed inputs and produces a fixed output over some very coarse, manually controlled time steps.

It's like saying using a calculator to add up the last few months of income/expenses is a "financial simulator".
Social Mobility in the Tang Dynasty
Some people used to write crap code stitching together snippets from stack overflow, now the same people write crap code stitching together what ChatGPT spit out after trained on said stackoverflow clusterfuck of buggy or flat out incorrect solutions. You do you.
Any Mac’hine.
You're going to get the Shanty Town whether you like it or not. https://www.kqed.org/news/11966960/san-francisco-is-clearing...

Low-cost housing solves the worst-of-the-worst problems. Its better for the poor to live in cheap rowhomes or trailer-parks than for them to be roaming the streets at night in de-facto homeless encampments.
I've been playing with some test numbers and end of the day if you start with a single founder and exit, the single founder take is significantly lowered by adding co-founders. I mean, makes sense the math, but still shocking the results.

SAFE
raise $750k, cap $4m

Series A
raise $8m, val $40m, options 10%, pro-rata

Series B
raise $20m, val $100m, options 10%, pro-rata

Exit
$300m

Single founder keeps 49% of equity which is $147m. Three founders each keeps 16% and $49m.
I can't wait to eave drop on my smart fridge making small talk with my smart toaster in the morning. Only slightly joking.
I was expecting something similar to PhD Simulator: https://research.wmz.ninja/projects/phd/index.html
IANAL. So this isn't a leading question; I really don't know.

What's the standard for liability for something like a manual on how to repair your own car brakes, where if you mess it up you might get killed? How about medical advice online, where if you follow it, it might kill you? How about a manual on how to prepare fugu? How about if I give what I think is good psychological advice, and they commit suicide?

If I write any of the above, and it's wrong, and someone dies because it was wrong, how liable am I under current law?

How about if I write something that someone takes as investment advice, and they follow it and lose a lot of money? How about if I write something that looks like legal advice, and they follow it and end up in jail?

What is the actual current state of the law on these things in the US?
"What the Houthis and these activist groups in America do after they’ve succeeded in stopping the genocide" is assertion that these groups are acting in concert. They are not, nor do they share the same goal. If you wanted to say they were tactically superficially similar, I'd shoot that down too (activists in Tacoma aren't blowing things up and trying to kill crew) but I wouldn't find the argument offensive, just deeply wrong.
My quick and dirty interpretation after skimming that article: he misrepresented a hashing algo to non-technical people who didn't understand that a) it's a one-way function and b) even if it weren't, multiple inputs can still map to the same hash.
Did you switch to Cloudfare's DNS? IIRC archive.is blocks their DNS servers.
No, it's a delve resonator, and its function is very well understood: https://www.poewiki.net/wiki/Prime_Chaotic_Resonator
Absolute layperson here, but:

> In some cases, that means administering the very antigens that the rogue cells are trained to attack, a strategy that can deprogram the cells and dampen the autoimmune response.

This sounds exactly like the strategy my allergy doc uses to suppress my allergies. Regularly expose my immune system to concentrated amounts of the allergens in order to deprogram the immune system's erroneous response. If it really is similar and analogous, I'm not really holding out much hope for this. Results from allergy shots seem to be all over the map. Yes, definitely positive results on average, that make it worth it for many people (myself included), but if it is indeed similar, I don't think this can be a general solution to these autoimmune diseases, that will work for everyone, or even most people.

(Notably, the practice I go to is an "Immunology & Allergy" practice.)

> Other researchers are trying to selectively wipe out the problematic cells, or to introduce suppressive immune cells that have been engineered to target them.

This seems much more promising? Probably much more difficult, though, which I think makes the "deprogramming" method above worthwhile to look into, since it could potentially work well enough, for enough people, to make it worth the effort.

Again, complete layperson here. If the immune system's response when it comes to allergies is nothing like the mechanisms in play when we're talking about autoimmune disorders, then... well, never mind, I guess.
> Rather, the shift away from hiring practices based on merit and competence, in favour of those based on supposed moral attributes, is an effect of our leaders losing interest in the material world. It’s only because of this that hiring criteria irrelevant to competence are able to creep in at all.

Like hiring based on race and class wasn't with us all along, just usually white and upper.
> The CIA started feeding flawed shuttle designs — NASA rejects — to the Soviet spies, which they passed off as new “improvements.” It worked. Included in the phonies were outdated heat shield designs that could have risked the spacecraft burning up on reentry.

They could have just given them the updated designs. Those risked burning up on reentry too (and of course did in the case of Columbia).
Didn’t see it mentioned anywhere but this is a great espresso resource: https://espressoaf.com/
Amazing! I feel the tinge on my left palm when it's plugged in. Bought.
The key takeaway "Every tech that is improving exponentially in the 21st century is explained by improvements in semiconductor fabrication." seems hard to believe. What about Lithium batteries? Same trend vastly different process.
Interesting. It would have never occurred to me that group 2 even exists, but in hindsight it seems obvious.
Thank you, this is indeed useful.
The biggest reason why is because the Java team works as hard as possible to get as much user feedback before putting a feature out there.

Part of that means that they will release minimal versions of a feature (records), and then observe how people use them before they start adding the "obvious" Quality-of-Life changes.

It's painful for those of us who are here when these features are just now releasing. But the end result is a feature that has less chance of screwing over other potential features.

It's best to think of it as a short term cost for a much longer term gain. Moving slow like this means that they will release a feature that is more cohesive than it otherwise could be.
I don’t know that it’s really that rare. I look around and I see people with the fiscal responsibility, knowledge and ability to get things done in every quarter.
I can pretty easily distinguish useful LLM output from non-useful LLM output though others on this website seem to have lots of trouble. I think I can pretty easily do the same for things in the visual field. To be honest, part of why I'm successful is that I can draw use out of imperfect tools.
No mention of how many cybertruck pre-order cancellations in the shareholder PDF...

I personally know two people who got tired of waiting and now own Rivians (and then cancelled).
if you are in a neighborhood where everyone makes above a certain level of money literally every door has one. this is true across countries even(the cameras might not be called ring tho)

turns out people do want a surveillance state, they were just uncomfortable putting cameras on the roofs
Googol's response is incredibly amusing. "The government can't be trusted with all that info! We have to cut them off! Only we can be trusted with all that info!"