skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Both western and Chinese chess knights move to the opposite corner of a 3x2 rectangle.

However in western chess, it doesn't matter what pieces are in the other 4 locations of the 3x2 rectangle.

In Chinese chess, you can only move from A to B if X is unoccupied. The locations marked "-" don't matter if they are occupied or not.

A X -
- - B

A -
X -
- B

- - B
A X -

- A
- X
B -

etc.

Of course, all the other pieces have their own rules as well, so it's a significantly different game. There is no queen, the elephant is sort of like a bishop but must move 2 squares at a time, the cannon moves horizontally and vertically but cannot kill without having exactly one (not zero) piece in-between, the "guards" and king all cannot leave the king's palace which is a 3x3 box, the pawns can move sideways after they cross the river in the middle of the board, etc. Come to think of it the only piece that has the exact same rules are the 2 "chariots" which are positioned in the same place as western rooks and function exactly like western rooks.
They're even more terrified of torch or another framework take up the industry. As ML is a research-heavy space, getting ML researchers to use your platform has benefits.
If FSD is the future (personally I think we're fifty years away but whatever) why the hell would you hand that future over on a golden platter to Tesla? Any serious car maker would rather develop their own software to remain relevant.
> And the intuitive notion of personhood (on which your definition depends and which you haven't in any way reduced to physics) is intimately connected with the idea of a more-or-less uninterrupted stream of first-person conscious experience.

"person": a member of the genus Homo

"speaking": phenomenon wherein the previous object vibrates its own vocal chords and moves its own mouth to produce sound waves

"currently": a point in time in which the aforementioned act occurs

Notably missing are: any references to continuity of experience, conscious action, or even thought. Suggestion: I have, in fact, completely reduced it to physics.

> You still have the fact that you are who you are and not someone else

Please describe to me a hypothetical universe where that statement doesn't hold true. If there is none, then we must accept that this "fact" does not require any explanation, and therefore can be dismissed as trivial.
It sure got knight wrong. But then again if done right it would look like swastika ;)
Velocity Role 2 – The Mole
And regulators usually don't regulate foreign companies? I am european so I was talking more about EU
No, this is not undefined behavior. Aggregate types are the one aspect of the C "memory model" that is very well defined.

The physical memory isn't necessarily contiguous, but the model of memory is. Which is the entire point. arr[0] and arr[999] are 1000 virtually contiguous blocks.

You can confirm that in the spec here: https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1256.pdf
Careful with this company. Do some research before buying anything from them so you know what you are getting into. Still waiting for my refund...
Measurement error of tools used to catch you speeding?
Firefox mobile extensions on mobile was basically a graveyard during their mobile overhaul. But it sounds like they are slowly making it easier to support mobile extensions with a metaphorical (or maybe literal) push of a button.
"(Dish antennas) require a lot of power to operate". "Our antenna is lightweight, low-power..."

What does she mean power to operate? When steering the dish with motors? Or is it in some special category for efficiency.
Thank you for your valuable input.
We agree that what you outlined and the questions raised (about targeted audience, problem solved, etc) is something that every business/startup should define very clearly for them selves first, so they can convey that to their customers/users.
We are really trying to do one thing only - a professional competitive league for anyone that may find it useful. While “anyone” seems to lack clear targeted audience, it’s just the nature of the social networks: FB, YT, IG, X are all for “anyone” by design.
If we have to be extra succinct about the problem that our platform solves and why the content creators would need it - turns their followers into passionate fans.
As for the followers - if two TV channels show American Idol, but on one of them is the classic format (where there is competition and a winner) and on the other, the exact same singers perform (concert-style) without competing, it is rather safe to believe that there will be significantly more people tuning in on the first channel. And this is the added value we deliver to our users compared to traditional SN.
There is a lot more to the benefits from our platform, but when the explanation gets too long it starts to become confusing
Thanks again
Cheers
no, they probably needed to emphasize the joke aspect to the pedantic army of superior IQ readers.
Oh, I completely agree. My point was that OF (and the entire sex work / porn industry) is intensely profitable — at least for the business owners, not necessarily the talent — and so half a Euro per install won't be any skin off their backs.

Actually, they'll likely be excited to pay it, since finally having access to the iOS market will unlock tons more revenue. (And lead-gen fees are no stranger to their business model.)
Are blind spot mirrors not mandatory there?
How are users protected in this situation?

To me this only seems to twist the arms of large companies like epic and Facebook. A small malicious app with thousands of installs can exist completely for free.
So LTSE is like a private investors club for companies with "long term purpose"? But as the FAQ says the companies have to already be listed on the NYSE or Nasdaq. So if you can access LTSE trading, you'll be able to arbitrage the stocks, which sounds completely antithetical to the idea of LTSE but how do they stop it?
But they are though? I agree that intrinsic privacy rights should prevent this. But the fact is this data is freely available, it's public information, the individual has released it appropriately. The problem isn't the govt using public data, the problem is that the data is public. You simply cannot have a privacy concern when you've agreed for it to not be private in the first place.
Mac has dispensed with consistency. Lots of secret handshakes, undiscoverable actions impossible to perform with a mouse for example.
https://www.folklore.org/Round_Rects_Are_Everywhere.html

The great an mighty Oz's crowning achievement. Ok, maybe the iPhone was bigger.
The CoC explicitly tells you to go see a mental health advocate or psychologist instead of taking it out on the game.

That aside, the general population absolutely must be educated on these behaviors. The admins can't be everywhere at once, and the amount of surveillance to replace players' eyes and ears would have to be enormous and the very definition of a nanny state.
Why would it be legal for a person or company to buy this publicly offered information but illegal for the government?
If you are using esp-idf-sys you can include external C library's. Beside it providing all the original esp-idf C bindings, it can include either locally vendored library's or (using the esp-idf component manager) remote components.

You just need to declare them correctly inside your Cargo.toml and it will automatically expose it all inside Rust. Though i have to say using C api's can be a hazard and to effectively using it you now have two problems as a potential rust beginner. First you need a good rust unsafe understanding and second you need good C understanding. So nothing i would recommend to a beginner, in either of this fields.
I'm trying to think through this from a legal perspective.

If I'm going from store-to-store around town, my understanding is that police are allowed to watch me and even go into the businesses and ask questions or pull security footage without a warrant. The information they gather is circumstantial and probably would not hold up in court, but they can use it as grounds to get a warrant.

Let's imagine a different case. Instead of police having to go in and ask nicely for customer logs and security footage, the owner happens to have meticulous notes that he keeps and sells to randos around town. Creepy... but it's largely the same data that they could have gotten by asking nicely enough anyway.

If there is no law against the proprietor bundling up his customer data and selling it, it doesn't seem like there is a strong legal case against police using it.

Obviously, this is a MUCH bigger problem on the internet than in real life - just in the huge difference in scale in the amount of data and the ability to parse it.
How do you know it doesn't have an impact?
Wow, what an entitled man-child you are. Vandals like you deserve incarceration.
It's not needed for safety, but for liability.
The equipment is costly because it need to be certified, because every piece of equipment inside will need to be certified.
Engineers in this field are averse to new technology because they are liable if something goes wrong.
Yeah, AFAICT Tesla hasn't given any details about what the license terms would actually be, this is just Musk going: "Make me an offer and I'll think about working something out maybe."

This ambiguity is pretty important given Musk's questionable history of self-promotion and construction/adherence of contracts.
No?

If you ask it to "Create an image of Joaquin Phoenix Joker movie, 2019, screenshot from a movie, movie scene" I would expect it to possibly (and probably) make an image that resembles the copyrighted Warner Brothers image. That's example 1. I fully expect systems which are trained on large corpora to reproduce copyrighted images like this.

If you ask it to generate a "popular movie screencap" I would expect it to generate an image that possible (and probably) resembles a copyrighted image.

As for the mario example, where they didn't explicitly say Mario, just "italian video game character", given that mario has been ubiquitous in our culture for 43 years, and mario is the most common italian video game character, I wouldn't expect it to produce another character (such as luigi, or... are there other italian video game characters?).

The datasets used to train these models almost certainly contain lots of images that closely resemble the one it created. I know that OpenAI says their corpora is "fair use" but I would be absolutely completely surprised if it didn't contain large numbers of images that are extremely close to what it produced.

In the future I would expect that training companies will reduce the amount of copyrighted imagery in their data sets, and also improve their loss functions to avoid images that appear to be copyrighted.
> The main hurdle for the EU (and the US for that matter) is IP and property rights. You can’t legislate your way around that without significant overhaul which would reverberate across all of commerce.

What?

Developing, compiling, distributing, and having users run an iOS app is not a "use of Apple's IP". The use of Xcode, SDKs, header files, etc is. What happens when an open-source SDK that is completely free of any Apple-copyrighted code comes around? What would the use of Apple's IP be then?
Oh yeah, it was an aside. I'm not worried about the world-leading US and Asian incumbents. Expensive regulations help incumbents. I'm more worried about the local EU companies that play in this market. Or I would be, something mysterious (sotto voce probably regulatory expenses) put them out of business.
> but I appreciate the long term view and not getting lost in the quarter to quarter weeds

What? How quickly we forget the maniacal EOQ death marches on the production lines. Even the Tesla faithful told you to be wary if your car was built in the last couple of weeks of a quarter.

Not to mention the serial pumps of "FSD, this year, this year, this year!"
That paper wholly fails to even mention the comet strike, except a single references entry to a 2007 paper. Its heavy reliance on Todd Surovell, a Clovis-first holdout, tells us all we need to know.

We have no reliable data about human population levels in North America, so nothing to correlate to extinctions.
Yeah, if you can afford normal lawyers they attempt to make the company comply with the law, if you can afford Apple lawyers they attempt to make the law comply with Apple’s interests. They will eventually implement something specific the EU tells them and receive a fine but for now it is worth trying it on and messing the EU around to try to water down what this law eventually means.
It’s the “cool” phone brand because it’s a quality product beloved by hundreds of millions of diverse people worldwide. Not having to deal with basic security issues is one of the thousands of reasons why.
The chargers that drop connection is typically because their max power budget per port depends on how many ports are used. E.g if my max power budget is 200w and I have 2 usb c pd and 2 usb A. Each usb c pd can have a max of 100w per pd3.0 specs. So if I have 2 devices plugged in to both usb c, if I need to plug a USB A device in, I need to lower at least one of the usb C to 65W.
Sounds like literal rent seeking behavior.
Buying a TPU?
I got a Microsoft force feedback joystick to play them... Sadly I got rid of it before I got more interested in electronics.
Barcelona is the go-to example of a city managing their existing street network for improved living environments.
https://www.vox.com/2016/8/4/12342806/barcelona-superblocks
Unfortunately the first tip doesn’t apply to structs.
>Opening a new door in many senses (or "in different ways" if you want to take some liberty), from now on, missions that couldn't be done until now will become possible. Isn't it the most important (thing)?

Translation for those wondering.
This is actually pretty interesting. Generic drug manufacturing has relatively high barriers to entry, but relatively low margins because there's no way for brands to command a premium. Standardized insurance costs work to prevent price discovery, and consequently you end up with supply shocks, especially for drugs that are difficult to store.

Even given dictatorial power over the FDA I'm still not sure exactly what I would do to untangle the swirl of incentive problems here.
As someone who has played a lot of chess I don't find this useful. I'm surprised how many people have positive responses to this.
To be ok to pay for it in the short term and not worry about it, to focus on the actual things that matter.

You can easily tell that your business isn't working out if you're asking this question, sorry if that's a little harsh. Its better to focus on increasing revenue than to focus on cutting cost, since you can always come back on cost & scale helps even more.
If you're looking to run programmable load test scenarios as described in this blog post, consider checking out https://k6.io/, which I've found to be extremely easy to use and powerful.
Landing is easy. Landing without causing further damage, though...
Sorry to be a bit disjointed in my replies here, but I'm flabbergasted.

Especially since WRT property crime (which is what we're discussing here), filing an insurance claim requires providing access to an actual police report that can be provided (by the police) to the insurance company in order to get your claim processed.

Again, please let us know which jurisdiction(s) (and please, be specific) it is that refuses to take reports of property crime. Thanks!

Edit: Fixed usage.
What's the difference between XR and AR? It's the first time I've seen XR used.
By the point you are using QML I don't think it's actually that much lighter than Electron. QtWidgets is probably justifiably better in this regard. Not all electron apps have to be as bloated as Slack, for example. It's possible to design sane applications.
Have they? You need to substantiate that claim.

1. Developers can continue to use the existing terms.

2. If a smaller developer elects to use the new terms, they pay less commission (10%) and a 3% transaction fee. That’s 2% less.

3. If they have more than 1 million users download their app, then there is an additional €0.50 Core Technology fee. If the developer is a commercial entity, then yes, they have to pay but in reality, it’s the end user that will have to pay.

3. If the app is free but offered by a commercial entity, they pay nothing in commission or payment fees (13% X $0
) but they reach 1 million installs, then they do have to pay €500k. If the business has no revenue - that’s a weird business model.

4. If the app is offered by a not for profit, then they don’t pay the CTF.

So, the new terms seem better for developers and users in the EU.
Consider for a moment the billions of people who have not played a lot of chess. Seems like a cool teaching aid for youngsters especially.
Nice! That would perfect for fully automated testing if a user didn't need to specify any primitive actions. I'm sure it still saves a ton of time/catches many bugs.
If this is true, given their birth rate, they will have to change, or run out of people to do things.
I'm surprised by the cluelessness of most replies here, given that this is HN.

Hardware is only as useful as the software that can run on it. Radically new hardware requires rewrites of certain layers of that software. Ain't nobody got time for that, unless they can be assured that there will be a large number of companies and customers who need software to run on the new hardware.
Yeah, but the rover itself was in possesion of russia and is now in posession of Garriot. That is undisputed.

What is rightfully disputed, is whether he also owns the land under the rover. He would like to, but not possible with current laws.
Having an extensive knowledge of fake stories from a variety of countries means you have an extensive knowledge of absolutely nothing.

Foreign religions deserve equally as much derision as domestic religions. How absolutely silly the things they believe are.

You'd have an actual point if you were talking about real philosophy, but you aren't.

If you want to discuss the topic outside the realm of ignorance, you discuss it from a philosophical lens.

Also, the idea that you propose, that merely knowing useless things makes you learned or an intellectual, isn't just silly, it's disgusting.
Can there be anything in the real world that is "literally 1d"? I would think not.
For paid software at least, it would be a silly strategy.

The point of buying software on the Mac is that it is tailored for the specific environment. Someone who doesn't care about any of that wouldn't even be a potential customer, since they wouldn't even use Macs often enough to consider buying anything.

At most it would only be attracting customers who are forced to buy that software because there are no alternatives.
That Fortnite article still explains what Fortnite is in the opening. "The Epic Games Store will include popular game Fortnite". They're not asking for it to be forced into the title, just somewhere near the top of the page.
I think you have convinced yourself of something and wouldnt see it any other way.

Youre talking about a world when it took months for a message to cross a country, with totally different dynamics. I dont think the US is going to tax japan, or attack them. What are you even saying.
A War Diary Soars over Rome
That's a very U.S. centric perspective. It's somewhat less common in the EU than in the U.S. to involve courts so readily.
Yeah I understood that part. My argument is that Facebook would likely lose a lot of users if they forced all users to download Facebook via their App Store. There is still an incentive for them to use Apple’s.

But beside that point, Facebook has been able to force side loading on Android for years and still distributes via the Play Store, so that’s probably at least some evidence that they believe that distribution channel to be worthwhile.
I wrote autoimmune areas, not autoimmune diseases.

If you're interested, here's more specifics about these areas, as explained in this recent research paper: Allergic Disease and Autoimmune Effectors Pathways (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2276104/)

Abstract: Allergy and autoimmunity result from dysregulation of the immune system. Until recently, it was generally accepted that the mechanisms that govern these disease processes are quite disparate; however, new discoveries suggest possible common pathogenetic effector pathways. This review illustrates the concomitant presentation of these conditions and the potential relationship or common mechanism in some cases, by looking at the key elements that regulate the immune response in both allergic and autoimmunite conditions: mast cells, antibodies, T cells, cytokines, and genetic determinants. The parallel appearance of allergic and autoimmune conditions in the some patients may reveal that such aberrations of the immune system have a common pathophysiologic mechanism. Mast cells, which play a key role in allergic reactions, and the wealth of inflammatory mediators they express, make it likely that they have profound effects on many autoimmune processes.
China runs on Intel chips like everyone else. It's AI researchers beg for Nvidia chips like everyone else. And its mobile companies use Android.

Chips that break away from those standards have little chance of success.
even with the simplifications, the article is extremely dense with acronyms and "crypto bro" lingo. you've been warned.
Weaveworks Seems to Be Disintegrating
I don't want to play Valorant :) Running malware because of wanting to play it sounds like a very bad trade off either way.
You are misunderstanding or misusing the word progressive here...

If I have an app that makes $20,000 annually and all of the sudden there's a huge influx of new downloads (with no guarantee of converting to paid), then I am bankrupt. Apple will charge $4,500 to me PER MONTH for 100k downloads above 1 million. If I have 2 million downloads, I now owe Apple $45,000 per month.

This means the new structure is incredibly regressive. This will destroy small businesses.

I actually could not believe the fee calculator was correct, so I found the section in the terms[0] section 4.1 (A) lays out the fee, which is 0.5 EUR per app install above 1 million installs.

This could, in theory, be used as a way for groups of people to target and take down small businesses. These downloads include "redownloads" where a user may delete and then download the application again. I can already see the lawsuits if Apple does not implement mitigations for these types of attacks.

0: https://developer.apple.com/contact/request/download/alterna...
> Consumers are indeed able to decide for themselves

> they can buy any number of Android phones

I can imagine a world in which iPhone's and Android phones were drop in replacements for each other.

And I can imagine Apple selling many wonderful interoperable products into an open standards ecosystem, with a tiny fraction of its current market cap.

But we live in a world with a huge global corporation with a highly knit ecosystem, quietly investing billions of dollars retarding threatening innovation, continually raising switching costs, and the costs of interoperability with alternatives, growing a tax base of third party efforts having little to do with Apple's efforts (streaming media and games, third party stores, creator economy, ...), shifting inconveniences from users to third parties, etc.

There are worse forms of coercion, i.e. the systematic privacy violations and manipulative media of the surveillance economy (run in part by Google the major benefactor of Android, and which even Apple dips its toes into).

But the choice between iOS and Android ecosystems is anything but a simple easily informed choice, free of supplier leverage, conflicts of interest, with predictable long term implications in cost efficiency and future freedoms of choice for most users.
They shouldn't have to be careful because apple's gatekeeping is what the legislation is trying to stop.