skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
From your first link:

> The Direct File pilot will be available to eligible participants in these states:

> Arizona

> California

> Florida

> Massachusetts

> Nevada

> New Hampshire

> New York

> South Dakota

> Tennessee

> Texas

> Washington state

> Wyoming

> The pilot is not an option for you if you did not live in one of the 12 participating states in 2023.

Cali, Texas, Florida, and New York are some of the biggest states, but most Americans aren't eligible.
Been there, done that and no, you're wrong. You won't find any investors if there is already a very well funded competitor that gives away the same product. They will spoil both the market and your funding chances. You can only get that funding before such an entity appears, afterwards it's a matter of patience until they inevitably self destruct.
For doorbell cameras specifically? No, it's not a product category that I'm interested in and so haven't looked into it. For surveillance cameras generally, the market is full of non-cloudy ones. It's hard to give recommendations without knowing what your needs are, and even then I'd hesitate because I don't maintain a mental list of what's current on the market.

I know that's not helpful, and I'm sorry. My process is to research options when the time comes that I am actively trying to solve a problem and just buy the one that fits best. For surveillance cameras, for me, this means "dumb" ones that I feed into a control unit that manages multiple cameras and applies any smarts I may want.
Is this meant to reply to a different comment?
Honestly, I don't think it's anything outside the usual suspects, but hopefully this brain dump is useful.

1) compiling is slowwwww, and something about my workplace environment (docker builds) means there's a lot of downloading and a lot of disk space used. cargo clean is helpful, and I blame docker more than Rust here. I am running in a VM, but I've had to increase the allocation to 150 G to run a fairly barebones Linux environment (no desktop) and not have to clean up my environment frequently. Some of my other environmental stuff is also super slow, so I'm pretty grumpy about speed in general.

1a) I've had cargo fmt eat my files when I was out of disk space. It created a new file, but the file length was 0, and my old file was gone. (I did not open a bug report)

1b) I hate how my dependency tree has about 700 items, but I still have to update h2 for a http/2 server security bug to make cargo audit happy, when AFAIK, we don't even use http/2 at all. (we do use hyper, and aws-sdk)

1c) There's about 7 different ways to get at epoll from Rust, but I don't think any of them let you set a sub-ms timeout, unless you use a timerfd (at least one of the 7 ways does do the timerfd for you, but that doesn't make it better, just easier). Why doesn't anyone make epoll_pwait2 available somehow. Although, really, this is more of a question of why didn't Linux offer a useful timeout in epoll_wait to begin with. If I were more familiar with Rust, maybe I'd be confident in just doing it myself, like I can in other languages, but it still seems scary.

2) It's pretty difficult to figure out what my system is doing from the outside. But I'm used to Erlang's introspection, and I was tempted to think that some of the features of Rust would make it Erlang-ish. Maybe I just need to use tokio_console, but it's not there by default, and I'm not sure how I would connect up to my running production system. This is probably more of a me problem or a my environment problem than a Rust problem.
> bad support for general editors

side note: only two years ago we were complaining about the lack of support for VSCode or the Jetbrains suite, now we have working plugins for them: https://lispcookbook.github.io/cl-cookbook/editor-support.ht... in addition of Emacs, Vim, Atom/Pulsar (very decent support), Jupyter notebooks, Sublime, Eclipse (simple support), Geany, enhanced terminal REPLs, Lem (multi-language editor built in CL)…
It is most definitely not. SpaceX is certified to launch whatever they can given their launch vehicle capabilities.

There is only a very small number of people at SpaceX that need secret clearances for DOD or AF missions, and it’s mostly mission managers, not even most engineers. There’s a point of contact regarding the payload adapter (how the satellite hooks and talks to the launch vehicle). But again, that is a very minor thing.

There’s maybe engineers with secret clearances working on military projects, but those are isolated projects.

And if you need secret clearances they government will happily screen your employees, or you poach people who have them. They are most definitely not a hindrance in the big scheme of things.
I wonder if there is a special name for this patching pattern, where not only does a piece of code depend on undocumented behavior, it's depending on the exact binary bytes.

See also: https://www.hyrumslaw.com/
I recently went down the rabbit hole on CRDTs and would love to know more about what you're using under the hood. Did you roll your own?
To me, the most compelling aspect of Clojure is it's very well designed standard library and ecosystem access via Java. Pretty much everything else is a negative.

Even then, the ecosystem is a Faustian bargain.
I picked the latter and hope that it doesn't eventually end up with Microsoft too.
There's no technical impediment to the existence of those systems. The problem is legal. Unfortunately, maps are copyrighted. We must collect and input the information independently.
That is the same animation, but it is also triggered if you have chosen a different wallpaper per virtual desktop. It animates the background change when switching desktops, and the animation feels like it lasts around 500ms. I wouldn't mind a quick animation but the default is too slow.
Dreams are free like they say :)
Netflix not supporting the Apple VR headset is a great example of the consequences of screwing over the developers. Prioritizing short term gains.
Are you sure?

Sure enough to feel that you can bypass cognitive bias and make an accurate assessment?
Sorry: we're on the continent; I translated all the above into english for HN.

(fwiw, restaurants here must label the origin of their meat products, and more often than not horse meat comes from North America!)
The other day I was looking up Unix find command on Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Find_(Unix)). It lead me down a rabbit hole to a project called Programmer's Workbench (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PWB/UNIX).

Notable firsts in PWB include:

The Source Code Control System, the first UNIX revision control system, written by Marc J. Rochkind

The remote job entry batch-submission system

The PWB shell, written by John R. Mashey, which preceded Steve Bourne's Bourne shell

The restricted shell (rsh), an option of the PWB shell, used to create widely-available logins for status-checking, trouble-reporting, but made safe by restricting commands

The troff -mm (memorandum) macro package, written by John R. Mashey and Dale W. Smith

Utilities like find, cpio, expr, all three written by Dick Haight, xargs, egrep and fgrep

yacc and lex, which, though not written specifically for PWB, were available outside of Bell Labs for the first time in the PWB distribution

Amazing.
Zed developer here, I've actually looked at how to implement AccessKit in Zed, though I couldn't find a quick way of jumping into it beyond 'read the egui PR' at the time. If anyone wants to take a stab at it I'd love to help out and make it happen :)
With online subscription related rants with Adobe ans SAAS, just wait,

>world largest corporation

Yes, maybe. But you need to maintain all of that, while Google and MS can stay 'alive' with a much bigger and more huge market with far less spending. Over time, Apple will lose lost of clients.

There is more market around Google/Android/MS products than Adobe. In the end, Google drives the economics more than Apple could ever dream. They own the data, and they are almost a monopoly on smartphones over the world, which is something in every household in half of the world. Over time, Apple can't win with these prices.
What's wrong with local runners like nektos/act?

I haven't used personally but curious if it has some shortcomings they don't mention.
working on this one! thanks
Show HN: Bulk PDF OCR made easy
How it works:

1. Connect Dropbox/OneDrive account (or use the web uploader).

2. Drag n drop PDF files to the Input folder.

3. Get searchable PDFs in Output folder.
Let’s say Alaska Airlines returns all Max planes… They can go bankrupt, because it will disrupt their business too much. So, as in every negotiation, they can’t submit Boeing to the maximum penalty.
Great tool but confused a bit. Is this a simulator or a calculator?
Extra weight can even be propellant which provides a bunch of options, including just extended service lifetime.
I would be a bit more worried about the last 3 years of no security updates from Microsoft, if you're still running Windows 7.
A while indeed. Euler and Bach are similar in that sense: to properly ingest their life's output you need more than one life.
And around we go lol
> Presumably execution efficiency, ...

Yeah, in that case Assembly/C is the greenest language but should we switch to them?

> The inefficiencies from extra human time would likely offset any potential gains from the pennies you'd save on CPU costs.

I'm not sure I follow what you mean here.
Since you are here I'll hijack the thread :) What about remote support ala vscode-server over SSH.
It really is a bizarre claim to make, I'm glad you said something.
By all means he was a crazy outlier generational genius. A few others in history, like Archimedes and Newton, have been accused of "not leaving anything for anyone else to discover" as well. The question was: why do we not seem to see these crazy outliers anymore? The answer is certainly not that truly exceptional people simply stopped being born after the year 1800. The nature of what it could mean to "know everything" about a field has completely changed.
~145M potential taxpayers across the states you list is a fine pilot program population to start with (out of 331M people in country). Walk, then run. As your pilot moves into a fully operationalized state, you then have customer support and engineering capacity to work out edge cases. I don't see a problem; I see the beginning of success. You have to start somewhere.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territ...
OpenAI scrapped a promise to disclose key documents to the public
Correct.

People say they want an AI but really they want something to automate and complete their daily workflow/tasks.

How that is accomplished is through the integrations, as you've described. But I am at a loss as to how these integrations have anything to do with NLP.
I suspect it’s more to ease into letting people file for free by cutting out “higher risk” filers. The income cap pretty much guarantees everyone filing falls into a simple class that doesn’t need itemized returns.
> Geany

I wrote that support mostly over a weekend, and judging by the lack of bug reports, either my code is flawless (doubtful) or nobody uses it.
the list doesn't have links though, and w3c link checker is there twice, is it some AI-generated text?
Incredibly cool pipelined data streaming architecture here. Just absolutely absurdly cool system.

There's a ton of fluff & setup to the video that did nothing for me. If you actually want to hear about the computer, skip to 29m mark.
I've been moonlighting for a few years on a digital product I'd like to sell.
People often ask if I want to get funding, and I always say NO.

Completely disregarding the ownership complications that arise,
just a few clicks in to your webapp (super nice work btw) shows how much bloated knowledge you need.

Does it make sense for early stage startups to hire a CFO to make sense of all these things? Absolutely not.
So better make sure your angel package includes their budget. /s

Funding isn't there for your best interest, it's there to make other people money. It lets you borrow time, and you still work for someone else.

very well done site though, maybe i will be smart enough to use it some day.
He is saying that it is annoying and has an effect of discouraging people from completely valid activities. Basically, it is uncomfortable to people who have to deal with those remarks and they then seen to avoid those remarks.

They do not care about correcting you and why should they. No one has any reason to try to convince you about unicycle effectivity, regardless of reason they drive it for.
> My understanding

What is your involvement? Author? Editor?
This anime exposed a $28,000,000,000 sweatshop [video]
The entire thing runs in the browser without needing a backend (unlike godbolt).

Fun challenge: Look at the source code and figure out how it works.
Jacksons handling of the Cherokee

Jim Crow laws

Nypd use of stingers to violate your privacy then replicate a criminal investigation independent of the stinger information to subvert DoJ processes and the rights of protection against unlawful search and seizures.

internment of US citizens due to their Japanese heritage.

CIA involvement in the Iran Contra debacle fueling the cocaine epidemic

The burning of unarmed civilians at Waco Texas

Would you like more?
It's not being burnt, there are two useful things we're doing with the 64-bit network size:

* Sparse networks. 64 bits is too big to feasibly do a brute force scan on, which reduces how often servers get exploited by random network attacks.
* SEND secures NDP by using those 64 bits for a public key

Reducing network sizes to 12 bits would destroy both advantages.
This is IMHO, why companies like McDonalds or Budweiser are technically so impressive. A lot of people will criticize them for being crap or generic quality food and beverage products, but it takes a ridiculous amount of engineering to make a product that's consistent, at scale, all around the world. A family member used to work as an engineer at a large craft brewery and making a consistent product year-to-year was one of their biggest challenges and they didn't always get it right.
You essentially only have to mail physical copies of your transaction histories if you had wash sales. (I'm not your lawyer tho)
How is this humanly possible? Was Euler even an order of magnitude faster at producing new math than, say, Gauss or von Neumann?
You'd almost hope there was some younger more code-centric version of Douglas Hofstadter, figuring out how to write palindromic or multi-framed assembler that was semantically equivalent to, for example, his "Crab Canon".
Well, my understanding now is that my comment hit a hot button for some people who have strong feelings about this site (i still have no idea what it is and why it's a hot button). I could try to explain what I meant but I don't think there's any point any more, they will interptet my words however they want.
Legislation doesn't affect the interpretation of the constitution.

And in this case, judicial precedent follows evolving (both popular and legal) ideas of what the words in the constitution mean.

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures..."

"Persons, houses, papers, and effects" has been interpreted in terms of what things a person had, excluding things that they had given someone else to hold. It was a pretty reasonable interpretation and compromise, until it was the governing case law that covered the cloud.
That's a good question. Right now you can only enter root domains, but eventually I want to relax it and you'd be able to enter `example.com/en` and `example.com/au` separately.

If the webserver redirects based on IP geolocation, it is planned way down the line to have a few Bernard workers spread around the globe, but I'll be honest, it's not my highest priority right now unless this is a common enough issue.
I find the notion of 'low-hanging fruit' in such contexts profoundly ahistorical. If graph theory was low-hanging why did it take thousands of years since Sumer or ancient Egypt? Or consider something from number theory: every other batch of students in a math camp I'm familiar with has someone who has 'proved' quadratic reciprocity for themselves -- and how could they not ? -- since childhood they have been immersed in a culture which points at it; while it took Euler roughly 40 years to even formulate the idea and then Gauss to prove it. It's not that
- to use an anachronistic term - class field theoretic phenomena was not known to other cultures thousands of years ago.

(Btw there are many contemporary mathematicians at least at the level of Terence Tao but for some reason haven't been blessed by lay popularity -- mostly because Tao's math looks more school math like / familiar to non-math people than say Peter Scholze's)
For fun: run your local government's site through this.
Python is my default language, so... everything.

The static site generator on which my websites are built is Python. The linters for those websites' content? Also Python. The UI tests for those websites? Playwright and Python. The code to rebuild the production site when new changes are pushed? Python.

I have a script to start my projects. It puts me in the right directory, sets up the environment, launches the IDE, etc.

I have a lot of small one-time scripts to export, transform and import data.

Basically, if it's more than a few lines of bash, I'll use Python. It's a wonderful language.
The article was written by a man who interpreted those remarks as a man. And he was there to hear the tone of voice.
Holly! loving the UI !!
Think how much a solution to organ donation would be worth. Cash kills collaboration®
No, the scientists behind DNA testing absolutely understand the limitations.

The people who don't understand the limitations of science and possible errors in certain methods are clueless jurors and the cops who pay a random person $800 to sit on the stand, say they are "and expert" and claim there's a trillion to one odds that two people could have "the same" DNA, even though that isn't even remotely what was tested!

Courts allow basically anything as long as you can pay a guy to say they are an expert and parrot whatever you want. But somehow that's treated as if it's the fault of biologists and others who do DNA analysis?

Maybe our courts shouldn't be based on "Trust anything a cop says, period"
Definitely. In general, most parts of technical SEO remain important (one h1 tag, etc)
>like saying electric fields and magnetic fields aren't different because EM field exists.

Funny you should say that, because this idea is well known as S-duality [1] in Quantum Field Theory (and more generalized in String Theory). In fact, if magnetic monopoles (read: charges) exist, you could already see that simply by looking at Maxwell's equations and replacing E->B and B->-E. If you also know a bit about the Maxwell bivector, it's easy to see how closely this duality mirrors how space and time are related.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-duality
Because it satisfies their narrative that you're basically forced to use tax prep (human or machine) to file and therefore the fact that you can actually do so for free is a false choice.
> oh look, the internet denizen was able to weave their way through a rationalization, that's certainly never been done before!

Yes, I gathered a couple replies ago you weren't interested in meaningful discussion...and probably hadn't even read anything I'd said.

> You've destroyed your _own_ point

What point? I asked you a question. You continually divert and misdirect.

Now the only point of contention I have left with you: Configuration and Serialization are the same thing, at the format layer. You mumble some nonsense about an abstraction ladder, but the truth is you're climbing it. The difference between only appears at higher levels of abstraction.

> I've never claimed ini works well for complex configuration

And yet you never made a claim about what works well. This is precisely the reason JSON/YAML are popular, and most people ditched INI, people don't care about your higher order abstraction, they just want a format that gets the job done, and doesn't get in your way.
> The whole idea of "being judged by your peers" is lovely on paper but cases like this show how stupid this is.

It's part of the system of checks and balances. If there isn't at least a plausible case for conviction, the case shouldn't even make it to a jury. The judge is permitted to throw it out for insufficient evidence.

In principle what's supposed to happen is that it prevents a conviction if the prosecution can't convince 12 random people that there should be one. The problem is prosecutors have the full time job of trying to convict people, and one of the ways they do it is by trying to change the system to make that easier. So then convicts get excluded from juries along with anyone else the prosecution thinks might be sympathetic to the defense -- even though having to convince someone initially sympathetic to the defense is supposed to be the point.
I'd recommend wgpu. It should be a fairly easy migration from Metal, as Apple has been actively involved in the design, and there are similar concerns for developer experience (unlike, say, Vulkan).

Unfortunately, graphics is in many ways the easy part. Really excellent integration with system menus, preferences, keyboard, input method editing, all have more variation across platforms and a still-evolving story of solid Rust abstractions. Lately, we've decided to try joining forces with the winit project to see if we can get those problems solved well.
There's a lot of hobbyists that can compete with LLVM's JIT, and they do it without any formal training in PLT or compilers.
Starship: The minimal, fast, and customizable prompt
> Would you like more?

I appreciate the Starship Troopers reference, and yes.
Correct. But at this point I support all iniciatives toward protectong civilians and promote a ceasefire in the region.
For almost 5k for the 1TB version it better have the biggest box of all devices!
> Digital transformation has become a goal in its own right, rather than a journey undertaken by skilled practitioners with a destination defined by the business itself

Destination gets harder and harder to agree upon as groups get larger.
What’s the crowd favorite self-hosted alternative these days?
See also
https://www.timhunkin.com/a243_Secret-Life-of-Machines-intro...
The PWB might well be called a "human-end" computer; like "front-end" and "back-end" computers, it improves productivity by efficient specialization.

- An Introduction to the Programmer's Workbench, T. A. Dolotta and J. R. Mashey
It assumes knowledge of the host platform, which isn't necessarily the JVM.

I've been working on a library that targets the JVM, JS/TS, and the .NET CLR. Clojure has let me share about 85% of the code across the three, though to your point the remaining 15% required quite a bit of platform specific knowledge. I'm fortunate to have worked with all the over the years, so Clojure has been a nice power tool that has let me accomplish a lot while working solo. It's not the right tool for every person or every project, though.

Since you've worked with Python, you might enjoy Basilisp. It is essentially Clojure with Python as the host platform.
On leisure-use paths and mostly-ag-use side roads (the young men are generally found in close proximity to the local football pitches). Because of late sunrise/early sundown in winter, we have enough reflective/EL material to make the horses look like they've headed to a rave without their pacifiers.
Also, blind mistrust usually is connected with blind trust ... in someone else. Some 'disprupter' or influencer says 'X is all wrong, they are liars, ...' and goes through the usual diatribe. Something in Internet culture results in a significant number of people trusting them, regardless of any facts, their credibility, the credibility of their target, etc.
I’m going to get this comment framed. It’s beautiful.