skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
A few weeks ago, I was talking to my parents about coffee percolators, which is what the Moka pot seems to be. My mom and dad have a bunch from the 1950s, which they sometimes use.

The cool thing about these percolators is they have a little glass dome that lets you see the percolation in action.

If you're unfamiliar, you can see what that looks like in this old Maxwell House commercial:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWEYjEQ75ZM

The reason I bring this up is that I asked my parents why percolators fell out of favor, and apparently drip coffee makers became popular because they are easier to clean and don't recirculate the liquid and, therefore, won't burn the coffee like a percolator might. I find this interesting because I then asked them whether their percolated coffee ever tasted bad or burnt, and they said no – and now Moka pots have become trendy.

One generation's discarded tech becomes a new generation's hipster product. (no insult intended!)

I actually don't like coffee, but I think it'd be cool if retro percolators could make a comeback.
HTML textareas don’t support entering tabs.

There are rich-text editors that increase the margin on Tab rather than inserting a tab.
We have reached the point where it is feasible to run all new networks on IPv6 and treat IPv4 as legacy protocol on the edges and special devices. NAT64 works well enough for most IPv4 access. IPv6 network greatly simplifies networking.

IPv4 will never go away, but will be smaller part of the Internet.
> the trivial extension of the IPv4 protocol

It wouldn't be trivial in practice. You'd still end up needing to replace everything in between. And if you're going to replace everything in between, you might as well upgrade it to something much larger instead of taking little half steps that will need to be repeated again and again.

> preserving the existing IPv4 addresses

But it wouldn't really in the end. 0.0.1.2.3.4 is still a different address than 1.2.3.4. You'd still end up needing to translate 0.0.1.2.3.4 to 1.2.3.4, aka a 6to4 tunnel. So, you're in the same place in the end as where we are with the current IPv6, just with only a baby step in changes that will probably need to be upgraded again in the future.
I run all the heavy stuff on a remote dev node. My laptop is just vscode+ssh, tmux in iTerm, a browser, Spotify and slack.
Yeah I knew that answer would be Helm Charts.

I love Helm. Helm is magic. Helm makes my life tolerable.

But I’ve templates way too many yaml files.

If it were up to me XML would be default and we would use XSLT for templates.

I’m pretty sure you can use XSLT on JSON, which is logical identical to YAML. So something could be worked out.

Maybe that should be my next open source project.
I don't think that's true, at least if you look at the topics that Germans think are most important. Which are also the topics of the opposition. There we have statements of parties which are quite different. But effectively when they are part of the government, they all collapse to the same politics. In particular, the FDP and CDU are guilty of this. The others are completely interchangeable anyways.
Are you claiming that one of the links shows that it is harmful, or only null, as you stated above (& which link, where?)? If it's null, then I addressed that - again, worst case is neutral, but more fair performance.
Phoronix do a good job with benchmarks, but their reviews typically stop there. There is another review from Verge that goes a lot more into daily use concerns and build quality: https://www.theverge.com/24047424/framework-laptop-16-review
That has never happened for me. I click X whenever I get a "New software available" notification and it has never once downloaded or installed anything.

While clicking on the notification itself (not the X) brings you to the Software Update section in System Preferences.

But I've never once triggered an install from the notification directly. (I have auto-install and auto-download both off in case that affects it.)
I'd say so - it seems that life has to be created via evolution/competition, and left to run long enough evolution (survival/proliferation of the fittest) is likely produce organisms/entities that are not only better fit to the environment, but also better fit to the game. Evolution will tend to producing things that are better at evolving (faster to adapt). This includes things like multi-cellular life and sexual reproduction (creating variety via DNA mixing).

One type of evolutionary niche that seems almost inevitable to arise in any complex environment is intelligence - the generalist able to survive and thrive in a variety of circumstances, and in the competitive game of evolution greater intelligence should outcompete lesser intelligence. Eventually you'll get critters sufficiently intelligent to build AI of their own level or higher, which may be regarded as another way to win the game of evolution - an intelligence that can evolve much faster than the type that bootstrapped it.

It's interesting to consider does AI/AL (artificial life) really need to become autonomous and stand-alone, or can it be more like a virus that needs a host to survive. Stage one AI obviously needs a host, but maybe it never really needs to become stand-alone? It reminds me of (git author) Linus Torvalds' quote "real mean don't need backups" - you just release your software and have confidence it'll get replicated in git repositories worldwide. Maybe AI can be robust to extinction (not need a backup/body) just by becoming ubiquitous ?
Atlanta, GA has 3 times the population density of OKC and it hosts NBA, NFL and MLB teams. All without any apparent need/justification for the tallest building in the country.

There are lots of other similar examples. The justification for this in OKC just isn't there IMO --- and is unlikely to ever be there for one major reason --- limited water supply.

https://www.koco.com/article/oklahoma-city-utilities-departm...

Major high density cities demand a large water supply.
Looks really great, I need web sockets and token generation to be able to use it for https://veloa.com
Those of us who were supporting Windows machines in the ‘00s remember when 100% of Windows machines not behind NAT were pwned in minutes, while those with NAT were fine indefinitely. Should a firewall have been doing that job? Yes. Were firewalls doing that job, in practice? No, NAT did, and it was very, very effective.

I have… concerns about removing NAT from everyone’s house now that IOT is a thing. Could it be done safely? Yes. Will it? Signs point to no.
The physical key mechanism is the same as on the Framework Laptop 13 (the same tooling too). The LTT video noted that they found flex in the mid plate that the keyboard rests on, which we are investigating.
> if it's only a handful of people?

It's not only a handful of people. There are already a handful of people verifying the issue in these very comments here, in addition to the people who have verified it in various other linked forums.
This whole thing definitely looks highly anecdotal, rather rare, and basically 100% certain to be a bug. No way is Apple quietly forcing Sonoma upgrades on purpose; this wasn't intentional. Apple Support's responses to some affected users appear to confirm this.
I'm not saying I never break traffic rules, I'm saying I don't deliberately do so. I don't run through red lights or use my mobile phone.

Not sure why that would make me difficult to drive around. If I'm on a motorway I overtake and when I've finished my manoeuvre and I just move over again.

If I see an amber light then I do what the Highway code suggests and stop if doing so won't cause a problem. If I see a red light definitely stop.
I suppose this is a meta question, but why is this in pubmed? While it is in the format of a research paper, this seems like more of a blog post coerced into that format.

I'm not an academic, so I'm curious, are papers like this just for fun or are they intended to actually contribute to our understanding of the world? Because I can't help but think that the methodology in the paper is dubious. Do we just the guy because he is a professor? I suppose ideally the reputation system is such that if it is revealed someone is just making things up they'll get booted out.

Not trying to hate on it, it was just an odd paper so it had me wondering.
Noted for future reference. Thank you for letting me know.
Thought you were joking about the wrenches part but apparently it's true?

https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2019/04/02...
> Quicken study shows: Maybe!

credit where credit is due. this is a material part of the headline.
millions of repos on github don't have those issues.

Youre talking an extreme use case. Like saying we need to replace the shovel because it cant do what a bulldozer does.

Its miniscule fraction of GitHub repos have those issues like an incredibly small number mainly devoted to games or media.

UX is fine if you know it. SQL UX isnt ideal either.
I am also not from the industry but here are some godot downsides from what I understand:

- script performances are worst than unreal or unity

- no asset market place

- 3d features are not up to par with other engines (level of details, shadows, etc)

For a classic 2d game it seems to have no significant downside. For a resource intensive 3d game it will depend.
Does this technique only work for certain prompts?
It happened to me.
Mac is just a tiny $30B/yr unit, probably didn't even get space in the spaceship. Thought of dressing up as a beggar on Tantau with a trashcan pro change can labeled "Will fix MacOS bugs for money".
TIL: Erlang Is a Chinese God with a 'Third Eye' of Truth
Another cool perspective is that simple organisms evolved to coordinate with each other to build complex organisms that could protect the simple organisms in hostile environments they might not / would take longer to explore. Think about all the gut bacteria that survives in humanity during reproduction and viruses and bacteria that invade and hitch rides. You can view humans as the life form or you can view the bacteria within us as the life form and humans are the organic machine they’ve constructed and control (eg look at how the gut/brain connection can effect your mood and decision making without you even being conscious to it)
> There's a nice synergy between using Mac and Linux - many of the same scripts, commands, and concepts work identically.

I switched to a Mac a few months ago from Windows and I kinda hate the small differences with Linux, I like WSL much better. On top of my head,

- No systemd

- No native docker

- No valgrind (there is https://github.com/LouisBrunner/valgrind-macos though)

I basically have to install a Linux VM on Mac just for this, at which point WSL on Windows is a much better tradeoff IMO.
It would be better to generate a user-and-codespaces-specific private key that would be safe to give to the user by checking out in the codespace so that you can use normal GPG signing flows.
Show HN: Captivating Profile Photos: Enhancing Your Social Media Presence
Explore our collection of exquisite profile photos, designed to elevate your online image. Each photo is crafted to showcase personality and style, ensuring your social media profiles stand out with elegance and sophistication. Perfect for LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, and more.
Clearly lots of people have tried to replace YAML with something else and that hasn’t worked. What’s your wishlist on making YAML actually work for declarative systems? Or can it work?

Would things like..

A great LSP with semantic autocomplete, Native cross-file imports, and conditionals based on environment make things feel different/better?

What should modern declarative systems be doing in your opinion?
This usually won’t happen if you don’t pirate anything, cheat or do anything that looks like either of those, but there’s always a risk
At which point did the MBAs convince us they are suited for more than bookkeeping? Medicine, engineering, architecture and many other things have been slaved to economics and this is presented as the natural order of things. Why?
We're still using the CoffeeScript of JSON because YAML's UX improvments haven't been brought into the upstream JSON spec like CoffeeScript's UX improvements were brought into JavaScript.
Full Headline: "...capabilities, and it will stay that way"

If you're after bragging rights, or economic advantage in one of the (very few) areas where the latest-and-greatest chipmaking tech is a major advantage...okay, it'd be nice if the headline was true.

If you're worried that China is aggressive, nasty, and all-too-powerful nation already - then the headline far less comforting.
I’m on quad eight and I’m still getting the infinite loop :(
Orphan Commits
The wave of the future! Half the people in my team did that, I didn't feel right about the EC2 costs. To each their own, I guess.
Furthermore this article only states: “They are not of a standard size, so will not be measuring devices.", which is incorrect since for use as a coincidence rangefinder (standardized to some standard) only the ratios between sizes of opposite holes would need to be standardized, not the size of the thing as a whole.

The paper "Roman Dodecahedron as dioptron: analysis of freely available data" (https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.0946) collects measurements of opposite hole pairs for 7 artefacts for anyone wanting to do their own analysis.
You're asking the question backwards. We have a concept, "byproduct of human action". We needed a word for this concept. We more or less arbitrarily chose "unnatural" or "artificial" as the words for this concept.

You can argue that "unnatural" was a bad choice for this concept. But that's irrelevant to what words mean. There are other words like this - for example, "antisemitic" means "something that is against Jewish people", even though "semitic" means "of Jewish or Arabic or Phoenician etc. descent". So something discriminatory against semitic peoples is not necessarily anti-semitic.

Natural language doesn't follow strict logical rules. And of course, natural language is in fact itself an artificial, unnatural, construct.
That is exactly the opposite of my experience.
There is such a thing as testing for the conjunction fallacy.
> To cut them a little more slack, their parents came from the broadly traumatized “Silent” or “Greatest” generations, and to cut them some slack, the PTSD of two world wars and an economic depression didn’t exactly make for a happy, well-adjusted adulthood.

Sorry, no, I just don't buy it. Europe suffered far more and yet they're far better adjusted and capable. This self-centered, oversensitive, nihilistic generation is simply another iteration of their self-centered, isolationist nation, looking for an easy, comfortable cause to believe in. And nothing short of a war is going to shake them out of that.
To my laymen brain this seems very similar to Lee Cronin's Assembly theory. Curious to understand more about the difference.
I'm using Firefox and didn't get any captcha... maybe its not the best archive, but its still better than Medium
The authors claim that it works well for a wide variety of cases. They have defined a novel categorisation of these evaluations which help guide LLMs to generate relevant assertions
stronly agree, I came to that conclusion before k8's even existed because I myself thought to use it as a configuration file format and the second I started realizing some of the ambiguity in it's syntax I walked away from it.

The only thing I disagree with is that Coffeescript is still useful. I had the same reaction to Coffeescript that I had with yaml, Coffeescript _never_ had any real point outside of a segment of people preferring to write javascript in Ruby syntax. The biggest issue Coffeescript had is that debugging meant reading through the javascript anyway so you never really got away from javascript.

I'm a fan of either using a full-blown programming language or ini files, and yes I realize that seems insane to many people but at the end of the day ini files are stupidly easy to edit and if you can get away with not needing a full-blown turing complete language then convention based ini files are vastly easier on the human than yaml or json.

I'm either a greybeard that never got with the times or I'm a rebel, probably depends on who you talk to.
The attempt on my life has left me scarred and deformed.
> Are you going to add some extension to IPv4 and try convince everyone to upgrade all their hardware, software and configurations? Then you have the exact same problem IPv6 adoption had

Yeah, so I'm going to say that's just not true. If IPv6 had been significantly simpler (e.g. by mainly focusing on increasing the address space) then adoption would be much higher today – probably universal. The problem is that IPv6 changes a lot, and that implementing it is a fair amount of work. The entire business with tunnel brokers and other compatibility schemes are complex and difficult to use.

To completely change gears now would be silly and too late, but it's been almost 30 years and it baffles me how anyone does not consider the entire thing a spectacular failure. People use Python 3 as a warning about compatibility, but IPv6 is a much larger catastrofuck, and that's largely due to decisions IPv6 people made. Whether IPv6 is "better" or not doesn't even come in to play.
I find it very confusing as well. Then again it's also typically the same people who say if only you'd tax me more that would fix society's problems and then when you send them the link [1] so they can voluntarily do what they say they want to do they say no! not like that!.

A number of people complain about "billionaires" for being rich and whatnot. My biggest gripe with them is they're often unimaginative and have no taste.

[1] https://fiscal.treasury.gov/public/gifts-to-government.html
Prize-winning play about snubbed computer genius Ada Lovelace
Hjson is pretty nice.

Two YAML-light style projects are StrictYAML (a Python library), and NestedText (an alternative spec with only string, list, and dict).
Construction costs don't scale linearly with height, so I'd imagine the sweet spot of cost per square foot is a mid-rise building. But I admit I don't have the hard figures on hand.
Can some people even pass Turing test?
Sorry, I misinterpreted your meaning of leadership.
Regulatory capture generally refers to putting up onerous and unnecessary regulations as a moat around a product or service.

I think you're referring to the weakening/dismantling of regulatory requirements and enforcement favored by libertarians.

Please correct me if I've misunderstood.

Edit: Personally I think valid and helpful regulatory frameworks can easily drift into capture territory, so they must be vigilantly maintained. Also to keep incentives in alignment, the regulators shouldn't be able to jump back and forth between industry and regulation. Dismantling them, however, is worse. Like a long standing code base there's a lot of useful but misunderstood parts.
Due to a forced software update, the rhino is now a bit closer to extinction. Windows must be stopped!
My correctness point is that Git can end up with commits which spuriously conflict with themselves. Git's merge algorithms simply aren't very good.

CRDTs (and REG) are correct in that everyone always ends up seeing the same document state. But I take your point - which is essentially that Loro (and automerge, yjs, diamond types, etc) don't correctly preserve intent in all cases. As you point out, if two users concurrently edit the same word, you can get nonsense.

In practice thats usually fine when users edit in realtime - since users notice and fix it. But its often not ok while users edit asyncronously (eg while offline). Thats exactly why I want a CRDT type system which can emit git style conflicts.
Thanks. I did not read your main comment for being mainly road related. In non-road related areas I am pretty confident Germany has more safety measures than UK. The non-existing speed limit and the German love for car(lobbies) appear to be quite similar to the love of weapons in the US. I am not comparing weapons with cars here. Just their lobbies and public relationship with them.
Considering it's somehow skipping the password authorization prompt for this... "special" upgrade in particular, even though it requires password authorization to update Safari or the normal security releases (including today's macOS 12.7.3 security and Safari updates) it seems less likely to me that this is a bug. My guess is it's meant to make a bunch of users get on the newest version, even though they didn't want to, and make them second-guess themselves about whether they made a mistake and brought it upon themselves.
Temperature as Joules per Bit
Asking the Wrong Questions
With fundamental technology change, we don't so much get our predictions wrong as make predictions about the wrong things.
I've been looking into keeping my network IPv4 in an IPv6 world, and it looks like there are a lot of sharp corners and kinks that make that problematic.

In any case, considerations like that are part of why I'm putting off any serious effort or decisions until it's required.
It would be interesting to contrast the unicycle experience with tandem bike experiences. When I ride my tandem bike with a partner I almost universally experience smiles and happy waves from people that see us.

I can ride a unicycle and rode it more often as a teenager. Lots of comments about getting lost from the circus. But they were meant to be funny. I think.
Certainly the colorful led backlight must have been the highest priority.
> Literally offers no upsides to the consumer, only potential downsides

Having globally routable addresses is a pretty big upside. For nerdy types, it means you can run web/game servers at home (i.e. without needing a credit card), which is a way for kids to develop their technical interests.

For the rest of society, getting rid of NAT is a requirement to allow seamless p2p apps to work without needing to use giant corporations in the surveillance business as an intermediary. Instead of being jerked around with Google moving people onto their 15th video chat app with potato quality, we have the necessary foundation to be able to directly connect with your counterpart. This could be completely seamless with e.g. a DHT to locate your contact's devices (or gossip if you can reach at least one that you already knew about, to maximize privacy) and uPnP or hole punching to their address to open your router's firewall.

NAT forces centralization for our foundational ability to communicate, which robs everyone of their autonomy in ways that are so pervasive it's increasingly hard to imagine another world. But that other world is still possible.
yamlops is a real thing :)
Antitrust isn't solely limited to natural monopolies. (Also most of the time, what you describe wasn't quite the case—there's many places were there's two, useless railways running parallel for each other for stretch, not for any technically useful reason—just an economic cooperation failure. You can call the monopolist's bluff and build a redundant (n+1)th rail line or an (n+1)th orbital launch company—it's just devastatingly expensive).
It sounds like several people chipped away at the inscriptions until a genius did it without knowledge of the previous work?
No, that's what the tabs hold-outs have morphed into. Which illustrates the problem with tabs: It's very difficult to get everyone on a team to care about tabs or not care about alignment.
I think you may have misunderstood me. By "the web application" I mean the application server, not client-side code.
Many of today's gas stations will survive the transition to EV just fine, just not as gas stations. They already make most of their money via the attached convenience store -- ripping the pumps out will mostly just lower costs.