skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
According to Intel's schedule, yes. Intel's schedule has 20A coming in Q3 2024.

However, according to Intel's schedule, they've been at Intel 3 since Q3 2023 (and Intel 4 since Q3 2022). The first Intel 4 processors actually launched in December 2024, 17 months after Intel 4 on their roadmap. We've yet to see any Intel 3 processors. I'm not accusing Intel of lying. Their roadmap can be when they've achieved a milestone rather than having it at the scale to start shipping chips. To be realistic about Intel's roadmap, 20A processors are probably coming in December 2025 at the earliest. That is earlier than TSMC's 2nm with gate all around and backside power delivery, but then there's also the question of whether Intel will actually pull it off.

I do like that Intel is recommitted to its fab, but I'd also say that it's too soon for me to believe that Intel will overtake TSMC. Why? Intel 4 is behind TSMC's N5 process in transistor density and Intel has only shipped a single line of processors with it - and they've had to use TSMC's N5 and N6 for the graphics and IO tiles. Basically, Intel has started shipping Intel 4, but not for most of their processors - none of their desktop or datacenter processors are using it.

There is a possibility that Intel will pull it off and I agree that Intel isn't stagnating anymore, but I'm not sure I'd go as far as saying it's "likely" that Intel will overtake TSMC. Yes, TSMC is still struggling to get 3nm beyond Apple. Qualcomm's upcoming 2024 flagship chips are using TSMC N4P. But while Intel has been making progress way faster than it had for a decade, their progress hasn't been as stellar as their marketing of it. Intel 4 doesn't match 5nm transistor density, Intel 3 still seems to be a mystery, and Intel is shipping few Intel 4 processors. Does Intel 20A end up falling between TSMC's N4 and N3P? Does Intel ship one processor at very low volume with 20A in December 2025 and it's late 2026 or even 2027 before they've got all their processors there?

It just the kind of situation where there's a lot of nuance because it doesn't matter what a company has "achieved". It matters what parts you can buy and at what price. I can get Apple products with 3nm, but it looks like Android devices won't be getting 3nm until 2025. That's available, but not to most people. Even if Intel "achieves" 20A: at what volume, at what transistor density?
I wonder how this tool works if it's actually model independent. My understanding so far was that in principle each possible model has some set of pathological inputs for which the classification will be different than what a user sees - but that this set is basically different for each model. So did they actually manage to build an "universal" poison? If yes, how?
Why not have the waiter come over with the card reader? That's usually how it's done here.
It will never happen. Why would the future platform owners, or especially separate service owners, want to let you enjoy the benefit of their hosting costs when they get nothing?
Here's my two cents, not directed towards you, but to the discussion in general.

If someone wants to lease a product to you, and you would rather they sell it, that doesn't give you the right to pirate it. When the only way to buy a thing is to "buy" a misleading lease, piracy becomes more "permissible", as in people will blame you less for pirating it, but that doesn't make it morally good.

It's obviously a bad thing for the publisher to make it seem like you're buying something, then pull the rug out from under you. It's extremely misleading, maybe it should be illegal. It's definitely a bad thing, even if it's all technically there in the fine print that nobody reads. Pirating the thing in response to this is a situation where two wrongs don't make a right. It's debatable, sure, but it's morally gray at best.

No matter how you slice it, you're still depriving the creators/publishers/etc of the money they ask for in return for the thing you want. Maybe you don't like the publisher, maybe you think the platform is evil, but you are still taking what doesn't belong to you.

A big reason it's bad is the plain ol' categorical imperative. If everyone did it, there would be no more music, movies, games, etc, because the people making them wouldn't get paid. That's true regardless of how the thing is sold.

If you don't like how they're selling it, boycott it. That's fine. It's not like we're talking about essential goods like shelter or food. Most of the time, the discussion is around entertainment.

TL;DR Pirating is morally gray at best, but it is not 100% morally good, and I wish people would be honest about that.
If a human isn't violating the law when doing that thing, then how is the machine violating the law when it cannot even hold copyright itself?
AML and KYC are about funding terrorism, not fraud.
That's what "domain fronting" was: you put an innocuous domain in the SNI but a different domain in the Host: header and in some circumstances with some CDNs this would work.
And we get to collect data on the customer! There's just no end to the wins!
And people cook the food, people do the dishes, people clean the restaurant, do maintenance on the chairs... All costs that should simply be part of the quoted price.
I'm not sure how to explain this any clearer: Humans and machines are legally distinct. Machines don't have the rights that humans have.
We tried migrating to Notes from Exchange when IBM became our service provider after outsourcing and I.T was selected as guinea pigs.

Needless to say, we hated the client interface and the exchange interchange was wonky - the feedback was extremely negative - "it is a pile of shit" was common and it was canned.
One odd thing I notice from TFA:

> "the majority of high-ranking product reviews in the result pages of commercial search engines (SERPs) use affiliate marketing

I say odd, because when the associate/affiliates program was started at amzn (1995), this was precisely the outcome we expected and anticipated and even desired.

It's not clear to me that it is a huge issue if the affiliate marketing is via a "neutral" 3rd party. If I honestly review Sony MDR-7508's as the best headphones, and I get my X% cut from amzn or wherever should anyone buy a pair using a link from my review page, it doesn't seem to me that anything particularly undesirable has happened.

Now on the other hand, if Sony pays me some negotiable sum to rank them the best whenever a sale occurs from my page, or even worse, just outright pays me to say that, then we're in a distinctly bad place.

Assuming you accept my framing, then we face the difficulty of being able to differentiate these two conditions, which is non-trivial to do.
It's not a non-ownership tend. There never was ownership of the content. It was a dillusion. Content was licensed. The thing that's changing is the licensing model, from, arguably, perpetual to a short term with indefinite options for renewal.
It’s interesting more != faster in every case. This is a cool project, and a great example of how AI (LLMs) are going to become easier, cheaper and more prevalent month by month.
Chances are he had a blog or something with content/pages and got approved. Then just re-used the codes/keys for the affiliate links on this new site. Once you start making money Amazon doesn't care.

Source: Me. I had a comparison tool for products with similar layout to this. They originally denied it citing 'lack of content'. Made a 2nd website with some blogs/reviews, it was approved. Re-used the code/api for the comparison tool and closed the other website. They haven't complained in 12 years.
Absorbing Traffic Noise with Bricks
I skimmed the paper but couldn't find it: What API did they use to write their kernels? I would have guessed SYCL since that's what Intel is pushing for GPU programming but I couldn't find any reference to SYCL in the paper.
well the covid vaccine is the medicine for covid?

not sure if it was effective at even stopping infection.
How do you train your upsampler? (Also: why are you seeking to provide an “antidote”?)
Yeah, that's the obvious motivation at the surface, I never questioned that. The thing is, people who "self-identify as winners" are incapable of seeing any downside to ubiquitous surveillance because if that ever turned against an individual, that individual would cease to be who they think they are. Self-inflicted blindness to all outcomes other than best-case.
Yeah, if this article was more balanced and less sensational they might have touched on(heh) how incredibly sensitive our sense of touch/proprioception in our fingers and hands is, especially if trained[1].

[1] https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/amazing-sensitiv...
Self-proclaimed 'Bipolar General' is waging war on the stigma of mental illness
You could always root your phone and install an open source OS.
if you compare the c64 palette to other ~16 color computers of the era, the c64 has a definite brownish/purplish tint to it, i don't think the video misrepresents it.
That's basically how astroturfing works though. "Marketing companies" have rotation of accounts that they use to create discussions to make it sound real. The easy ones to spot (again, i'm just a messenger here, but been paying more attention since I've been told about it during drunken rants) is when a reply-comment is asking a very simple follow up question regarding a product review, which can be easily Googled, so the OP would respond back with even more positive reviews. It's fun sometimes to spot it and go into account's history, and sometimes it becomes extremely obvious from just the subs they frequent.

The other couple fun ones that are easy to spot - someone asks for a recommendation, and a comment is a list of 3+ brands to make it sound "organic". You go into the history of the account, and you can see they always include one specific brand name in every list they suggest with 4-5 months in between posts. Or someone asks for a recommendation (brand themselves), then there's a response from a random person suggesting a brand that is extremely niche, and the OP a few days later comments back saying "i tried this, and this is amazing!".

My guess is, most of it is a "long game", as Reddit et al. is extremely lurker-heavy. I could see SEO companies setting up shops and having different tactics to play the game. The other problem is, since every company is doing it, you will get a "great product from Reddit recommendations", as those great companies also have to do it. But it's just a gamble at that point. As much as I'm not a fan of them, I tend to stick with wirecutter / consumerreports as my "starting point" of the research, where it applies. Not the best, but I feel less tricked than going through Reddit.
You mean the cops. Yes, police force has a large number of sociopaths and psychopaths: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1...

Government official roles likely tend to attract those types too, although I don’t think the president of Portugal or any nordic country are more of a psychopath than the past presidents of the USA for instance (like, all of them) “because socialism hurr durr”
Even if China invades Taiwan and no sabotage happens to TSMC, sanctions would mean TSMC won't produce anything for years, and during that time other companies will catch up.
If the restaurant has so many things on the menu where it's a cost savings to do this, there is no cooking real happening there. Everything is frozen and reheated .

Don't waste your time and money there.
Haskell has full support for IO and mutability. It even has software transactional memory in its standard library.
Yes, and they are doing it better than Steam Client i think.
If that's the root reason, then there is zero reason that footage is open to consumption by the manufacturer (and made generally available to Tesla employees). That is owner data, not company data and it should be stored in a cryptographically secure manner accessible only to the owner themselves. This is entirely possible to implement but it just isn't because it would be forfeiting part of their information asymmetry that Telsa enjoys over it's customers/market.
To protect an individual's image property rights from image generating AI's -- wouldn't it be simpler for the IETF (or other standards-producing group) to simply create an

AI image exclusion standard

, similar to "robots.txt" -- which would tell an AI data-gathering web crawler that a given image or set of images -- was off-limits for use as data?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robots.txt

https://www.ietf.org/
“…and I almost forgot ahh, I'm also gonna need you to go ahead and come in on Sunday too, kay. We ahh lost some people this week and ah, we sorta need to play catch up.”
> This is not my idea and I didn't say that. I criticize those who waste their time chasing the "theft", who they blame for being the origin of the artists being poorly paid,

Oh well if this is truly the point you wanted to make, then we're in agreement.

Earlier I was responding to:

> > jsnell: In the plan where you buy music and only listen to the music you bought you don't need [YouSpot] at all.

> drewdevault: I feel like pretending that you're supporting your favorite artists by listening them on Spotify is a bit more of an appropriate comparison [to not supporting the artists]

I wasn't saying either of these things are better, simply pointing out that paying for spotify is going to support a broad selection of artists a little bit, while paying through bandcamp is going to support a narrow selection of artists a lot, and that both are desirable:

> You're supporting the artists you listen to more uniformly (via spotify) though ... you could support all the artists you listen to by paying for a spotify/itunes/whatever subscription and using that as your primary listening service, while also purchasing their music via bandcamp.

Aka both is better than just buying the music of a few artists through bandcamp while listening to everyone through piracy or YouSpot. That doesn't mean I disagree with anyone choosing to go the piracy + focused bandcamp patronage route.

You jumped in with:

> Paying only 9% of a physical good wouldn't make anyone less of a robber.

Which I took to mean "no actually, just paying Spotify is theft".

If the 80% of people with a limited entertainment budget pick their top 5 artists to support every year, the virtuosos of music are going to benefit, while the "B-tier" and "C-tier" artists who people still like to listen to are going to suffer a lot more.

Paying for Spotify, or more aptly, Tidal (which seemingly pays artists the most) is probably the most realistic way that's accessible to a lot of people, to support the artists they listen to in a way that tracks their actual listening preferences. Yes, buy music in addition to that if you can, but if everyone chooses a few artists to support directly, it's still going to result in many musicians getting unfairly compensated despite lots of people enjoying their music, so I disagree with the idea that it's better to spend $90 on bandcamp in a year vs. $90 on spotify in a year, if it is a choice of one or the other.

Better in some ways sure, because you're disintermediating the streaming platforms, but worse in equitable distribution, which will disproportionately impact artists who are liked by many but "top-10"ed by few
El Paso County to challenge Marathon refinery permit
NASA loses contact with Ingenuity Mars helicopter
Maybe some SQL server should require a token like “USING_WILD_GUESS” when doing a natural join :)
This is an oversimplification. I assume you're both talking about REGOs. Electrons are fungible so you're sort of right in that you aren't using the exact electrons that come from a wind turbine. But you're wrong that the extra money just goes straight to profits and has zero effect on green energy generation.

Imagine two scenarios:

1. Everyone believes your comment so nobody pays extra for green energy. Therefore the market value of RIGOs is 0. This means green energy generators get paid exactly the same market price per kWh as brown (?) generators.

2. Some people (not necessarily everyone) pay for 100% green energy. This increases the market value of RIGOs so now green suppliers get paid a bit more. Green energy is now worth more than brown energy, which changes the supply/demand curve so you get more green energy overall.

The RIGO market is a very elegant market solution to selling the "greenness" of green energy. The fact that it isn't a dumb 1:1 connection that people naively expect doesn't mean it is a scam.
> The Bakery Algorithm's unique feature is its ability to ensure mutual exclusion in concurrent programming without requiring atomic reads and writes.

This is the key, and somewhat surprising. Had someone told me critical section was possible without hardware support (atomic reads and writes), my knee-jerk reaction would have been "not possible".
we need a youtube client to scrobble and buffer video in full and fast forward much smoother !!
I basically agree with the way he's thinking about it. That is, general purpose computing devices are sold by having a large number of applications that add up as opposed to a "killer app". I remember an article about home computers from a early 1980s ham radio magazine that pointed out that you couldn't justify the cost of a computer to do just one thing with it, such as track satellites, but if you use it for all sorts of things around the house and to keep track of your contacts and to work digital modes it is a great deal. Similarly the smartphone.

On the MQ 3, Asgard's Wrath 2 proves you can implement a big game a lot like a Legend of Zelda for a standalone headset although the kind of "cozy" titles he talks about are still pretty interesting.

Many spatial applications will be "game adjacent" in that they will be based on video game frameworks and technology. Panographic video can take you to the observation deck of the Eiffel Tower or to a computer-rendered forest on a planet like Pandora.

I like 3D movies a lot and enjoy them on my MQ 3, including photos and video I shoot with my Ego. It's a shame that 3D movies have faced the headwinds they have.

My understanding is that the AVP will not have the "roomscale" VR mode that the MQ does, instead VR apps will be confined to a small area which is a limitation. On the other hand, the MQ 3 is limited by privacy to concerns to not really give apps information about the space users are in. An app can't use the camera to view a QR code. The Hololens builds a SLAM database that lets you stick a "hologram" in a room and come back a day later and still see the hologram and the MQ 3 doesn't do that.

The MQ3 comes with an awesome demo and they provided APIs for MR development like this one

https://developer.oculus.com/blog/mesh-depth-api-meta-quest-...

but I haven't seen 3rd party apps in the store that use it, but I preordered one that will come out next week. Apple seems to have some ready right out of the gate.
Why would you train one?
Yes, it looks like there is some artificial placement. This may be driven by malice (some sort of paid or more lucrative placement, like you said), but also by stupidity (algo prioritizing songs already in the client cache, to save some egress bandwidth perhaps?).

So I started clearing the Spotify client cache more often, and it looks to me there is more diversity, at least on the auto-generated "recommended songs" playlists. But still, no hard proof of this.
OK I found it. Looks like they use SYCL (which for some reason they've rebranded to DPC++): https://github.com/intel/intel-extension-for-pytorch/tree/v2...
Not related to the actual topic here, but I’d been eyeing those exact headphones for years but never bought them because I thought they were for musicians or something. I recently got them (and a cheap DAC for my desk hooked to my MacBook Pro) and just…wow. With the right equalizer settings, you can hear whole new parts of songs you didn’t/couldn’t know were there.

I still travel with just AirPods because they’re so compact and easy, but I’m in love with those Sonys.
Apple Offers to Open NFC Payment Technology to Third-Party Developers in Europe
Comments moved to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39058428.
The reason those tools have more limited support for joins is mainly because they are making intentional trade offs in favor of other features, eg performance in a particular domain.
I would say the opposite - most of countries are more or less on the development level that their culture and geographic location permits, few countries are significantly below this level and fewer still are significantly above this level.

Singapore is exactly where it should be, given its culture, legacy, location, and the fact that it is a city-state. It would still be Singapore under your average ruler (of Chinese culture, not African). It has awesome hand so it does not take much skill to play it.

I could not repeat enough the argument of city-states being different, and usually very rich, so that's what I'm going to do. You should never compare Singapore's GDP growth with any country which has, well, countryside. Still, Taiwan will give Singapore a run on its money while not even being a recognized country.
It may depend. I was mainly educated in the UK. I went to council schools in poor areas, and to an expensive public school, and the difference between pupil behaviour was enormous. In the former they were hard to control (I even remember a kid angrily telling a teacher to fuck off) but in the former when the teacher started speaking everybody piped down and started listening immediately. I remember being so struck by that the first time I saw it. I guess a class of willing students is going to be a whole lot easier to teach than a roomful of ragamuffins who would rather be outside playing footie.
> Congratulations, nobody is going to sneakily update an object on you

I've seen Heisenbugs where some random code calls a setter on an object in a shared memory cache. The setter call was for local logic - so immutable update would've saved the day. It had real world impact too: We ordered a rack with a European plug to an American data center (I think a human in the loop caught it thankfully).

Also, how often do you even use mutability really? Like .. for what? Logic is easier to express with expressions than a Rube Goldberg loop mutating state imo.
A million Swiss francs in bill form isn't that much. We have CHF 1,000 denominated bills and the law states the maximum in coins is CHF 100 that you have to accept.
Because they are meant to be entertainment first and education second, and that's what people are looking for. There's a reason the History Channel pivoted exclusively to shows about aliens building the pyramids and the like.
Now that there’s no longer a giant pool of unemployed workers in North America who could otherwise be employed to courier food orders from a restaurant’s table to its kitchen, there’s a real tradeoff between a human doing a job that only a human can do and a human doing a job that a robot (or a website) could easily do with current tech.
These methods like Glaze usually works by taking the original image chaging the style or content and then apply LPIPS loss on an image encoder, the hope is that if they can deceive a CLIP image encoder it would confuse also other models with different architecture, size and dataset, while changing the original image as little as possible so it's not too noticeable to a human eye. To be honest I don't think it's a very robust technique, with this one they claim that a model instead of seeing for example a cow on grass the model will see a handbag, if someone has access to GPT4-V I want to see if it's able to deceive actually big image encoders (usually more aligned to the human vision).

EDIT: I have seen a few examples with GPT-4 V and how I imagine it wasn't deceived, I doubt this technique can have any impact on the quality of the models, the only impact that this could potentially have honestly is to make the training more robust.
Have you tried Make it by tldraw? Its free and fun! Here is a good example: https://twitter.com/tldraw/status/1746265563368710345