(Which is why we need boosts of wisdom, which is why we need to implement actual, proper Intelligence.)

This makes me sound as if you believe the human race needs to be "parented". Worse, as if you believe it is not intelligent. Both of these things are entirely false.

If this is your belief, let me assure you that the very act of trying, will result in massive war, death, violence, and destruction. I literally kill nothing, even insects without deliberation on whether I have choice or not to do so. I have a cool head, and will not attack physically without great provocation, eg self-defense.

Yet were someone to start taking instructions from any form of AGI, I (and many people I know) would take that as an extinction level event greater than all out nuclear or biological war. I would view it as an attack by a dictatorial state, in fact as a 5th column, except with such vehemenistic angst and horror that I would show no restraint.

Any attempt to implement such instructions from our new "overlords", and I would raze everyone and everything involved to the ground. I'd probably want to have the offspring of those involved, and all family members of said persons, rendered infertile, just to ensure the flawed genes of those insane enough to try, didn't spread.

Why? For the safety and security of the human race!

Humanity may be flawed, but at the same time, you cannot "parent" humanity into "better things". We already 100% know what is needed. We 100% are aware of what's wrong, and right in this world. The only way to "save" humanity, is to literally wipe out all of those who do not agree, 100%, with you. Or alternatively, place a boot on their neck.

Would you do this? Would you and the new AGI masters, determine who breeds? Who lives? What traits are perfect? What culture? Would you employ re-education camps, for those capable of being re-educated?

Humanity must either get there on its own, or it must die. There is no middle ground. "Parenting" humanity will result at best in stunted growth, will result in no change, at worse will result in stagnation, regression, and the loss of who we are.

And we are Great. We are Good. We do horrible things to one another, we struggle, we strive against our fellows when we should not. Yet that does not detract from the good we do. The care we employ, the fact that even as we struggle, we also care. Certainly, what we don't need is for the parallels removed.

The parallel to attack, is to protect. The parallel to care, is to lash out. The parallel to be angry, is to love. An example, one perspective's attack, is another's protection of offspring. To care for another, means perceived lack of reciprocity may result in 'lashing out'. To be angry with another, you must be passionate and be capable of love.

If you do not understand how the good invokes the bad, and vice versa, than I suggest you stop meddling in the affairs of humans. And you, and your AGI good time pals, should go home and leave us alone.

If you believe this is an 'over the top' response, you literally have no idea. My response is predicated upon two core beliefs, and crafted with understanding of historical context. It is reasoned, considered over decades of thought, and not awash with emotion.

Yet I can assure you that such acts would quickly take such emotional hold upon most humans, that my response above may seem a very restrained.