skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Why wouldnt Norway open new oil fields?
I think their investors should be happy about it. Once more open source models are released, a lot of ai companies will be freed to focus on other things, thus increasing the overall economy.
So far mine keeps working with Home Assistant
There's "topical" chemo for some stuff, but it's uncommon. Most chemo is either in pill form, or (as was for me) delivered intravenously. So it goes through the whole body.

Radiation therapy can target specific areas. It's still used instead of chemo in some cases.
Anger sparked by TV drama forces Fujitsu to put hold on public sector bids
Which reminds me; who are these people who are being hit by the pollution and aren't using fossil fuels? They aren't people in Norway; they're all living a lavish lifestyle full of stuff created with fossil fuels. That isn't a real externality. To a first approximation we're already paying for a large chunk of the price for the pollution generated on our behalf.

PostScript Whoever it is would be much better off getting more access to fossil fuels than having access curtailed. China did not become a wealthy industrial powerhouse with environmentalist policies. The argument that negative externalities are a problem is silly; clearly curtailing fossil fuel access is more damaging. Sucks to be Africa or wherever with spotty oil infrastructure and access. Whether it is technically an externality or not, it is clear that unaffected third parties would benefit from more oil, not less.

The externalities are clearly not being accounted for properly/are not net negative when curtailing a thing causes living standards overall to drop.
> What could go wrong?

Probably nothing. Bad things happen in dark corners. Shining a little sunlight into a dark corner is almost always a good thing.

In this case, possibly a very good thing. Because even just the threat of a little sunlight being shone on your performance generally improves it. This viral TikTok video made that possibility very real in a lot of peoples minds.

So I'm guessing this video going to have an outsized impact, for the better.
How often are people touching screens? I have a 2023 BMW and it’s all screen. But, I can usually set it once and not touch it again! Am I crazy?
The quality of the data matters a lot. Textbooks, scientific papers, etc… are substantially better for training smart and capable LLMs than random social chit-chat.

Google and Microsoft both have a lot of corporate info, including source repositories they can legally use.

Google has Google Books, Maps, and YouTube.

Microsoft has Azure, GitHub, LinkedIn, etc…

Facebook has… what? Instagram? Your crazy aunt screaming about her conspiracy of the week?
Our first-gen Audi Q3 is a "small" SUV that could meet your stated requirements as a used car. I think 2018 model year was the last year of this (first) generation in the US market.

It was given high predicted reliability ratings by Consumers Reports back when we were shopping for it. And ours has been reliable. However, regular maintenance can be costly. I think it shares a lot with similar vintage VW GTIs, so you might be able to find a VM-oriented independent mechanic who could take care of it.

It's a 2 liter turbo 4 cylinder. It has the haldex clutch style AWD and ours can get around 30 MPG on highway trips. I might see 24 MPG around town if smoothly cruising, but it easily dives to 18 MPG or worse with too many red lights or stop and go traffic. This is pretty typical of all the small Audi turbos unless you get to the much more recent mild-hybrid setups.

This first Q3 generation started ~2011 in Europe, so the cabin tech is quite dated and minimal. Our basic "premium" trim level has no connectivity other than bluetooth to phone for calls or music. It has a rather small screen for the reversing camera and music/phone/settings.
> It does not integrate at all with the host platform

SDL does in fact make system calls and have OS-specific code (DirectX implementation, Metal implementation), even if most of them don't directly manipulate OS UI controls, though it can initialize a window with a rendering context on any of its OSs.

I feel like you're missing the point that performance matters less than accessibility for UI frameworks. HTML and CSS are the most popular choices because a child can learn them quickly. Native apps aren't as popular because all the frameworks out there require you to be an engineer to use them.

> 1. the idea that it's "easier" simply implies lower understanding of what is being done and that you aren't considering any of the edge cases you still need to handle.

I don't see how that follows at all. HTML is declarative and powers most applications at this point.

> 2. Not sure what to say here, as I don't know your point? it seems more about the type system of your language and not at all related to the ui toolkit

Web browsers are very forgiving with HTML errors, native UI frameworks (especially those which simply convert the markup to imperative statements) often refuse to run entirely if there's a single markup error. A native framework which seeks to become as popular as HTML would need to be as flexible as HTML

> 3. html, css, and the DOM all have a very clear model for how and what a UI is, claiming it isn't means that you haven't apparently spent much time working in any other system. Much like I keep meeting people who say that they don't have an accent, everyone else does

You're not understanding what I'm saying. You can run an ajax request and get some data, but to put that data into the UI would require you to run a query on the dom and manually set the innerHTML of the element to the new data. Some other UI frameworks will force you to bind specific variables or lists to a control in order to auto refresh when the bound variable changes. This is an opinionated framework: one which tells you how to manage updating the UI rather than allowing the developer to do it themselves. Such an opinionated framework would become more difficult for people to learn

> 4. Application development is conceptually complicated unless your application is not doing anything interesting. I'm also curious what makes a browser ui more "simple" than say Cocoa?

I have no experience with cocoa because I don't use a mac, but from what I can tell it requires you to know Objective C and run XCode. HTML requires, at the very least, notepad to write. It is extremely easy to get setup with HTML and start learning it as a lay person.

> 5. Sandboxing is a part of the OS, not the UI framework. All applications on iOS are sandboxed, that vast majority on macOS are.

You would want to make sure that programs written in this framework are sandboxed away from any resources. On Windows this means AppContainers and on Linux there are different implementations (snap, docker). But the host which runs and loads the UI should run all applications sandboxed by default (i.e: like a web browser)
How does that follow? Is your premise that a static number of people are producing ever-increasing numbers of papers? That's not what's happening at all. There are lots of papers because there are lots of people doing research. As the number of vulnerability researchers increased, drastically in the 2000s, the number of vulnerabilities went up --- there was a point where people we tracking new vulnerabilities, across all platforms, by hand! But the median quality of a vulnerability research result didn't fall; in fact, while the variance increased, the peak quality of vulnerabilities improved.
There's definitely a difference between "Cookies provide X value" and "We were able to mitigate the loss of cookies by doing A, B, and C - but we don't know the value of doing A/B/C individually."

If the point is to quantify the value of cookies then you need to measure that as an independent variable. Attempting to compensate with other actions, each of which you also don't know the independent value of, means you will be unable to quantify the true value of cookies or the value of your other actions.

What if none of the tools they're using, including cookies, provide any measurable value? How would you know? What if the value of cookies (X) and item A is positive in terms of impact, but B and C are both negative, but not enough to offset A so it comes out in a wash?
Right. It's fine/expected if the "failure" comes in this category (though many investors would encourage you to simply repay them and move onto something with more growth potential).

The unethical thing would be pitching a unicorn plan when the actual strategy is building something much smaller.
It was a flamewar comment whether you intended to post more or not.

"Toleration of conflict" in that quote is hardly saying that people should just inflict whatever they like on each other!
Thanks a bunch for the link! I love how you fit a quake renderer onto such a small device (having a demo scene size coding history, I enjoy the challenge of a constrained target and I'd like to do something similar with the MRISC32 ISA some time - e.g. an "MRISC32-A0").
Have you folks ever heard of a company called CAT?

They tend to make things for pushing around dirt.

So, TEU containers are TINY. What if - we used an army of CAT-like dirt movers in key areas to FUNNEL wind through a bunch of "wind-tunnel" type things and feed higher power wind in the directions we prefer?

Maybe call it "planetary vehicular land transmogrifcation" - or "terra-forming" for short?
> I'm pretty sure the Soviet context is actually the correct one.

Just to clarify, do you mean that the Soviet context is the same as the modern context or that the modern context misuses the term in some way (or something else that I missed)?
It is if you assure your investors you plan to take risks to pursue hockey stick growth, but instead you intend to keep the money in the bank and putter along.
The law shouldn't be involved in this. Fix your systems. Tax payers should not be forced to defend poorly designed systems.
I don't see anything wrong with this. Every update adds a bunch of new code and features to your phone that you don't even get to look at, does it matter if they add something which you can see?
How Do Bitcoin ETFs Affect Blockchain Devs
Here’s a thoughtful view on the matter…
The problem is that replication studies aren't done hard enough.

And by replication studies I mean "take this paper, try to replicate, write a paper on it".

Every singular paper can be wrong, that's why you're supposed to replicate them - that's at least what was taught in psychology, which many consider "social science of less rigour" - well, it was probably the course most hardcore about experimental design in my education and ability to replicate a study...
Hard to do when the cruelty is the point; I tend to reserve the short end of the stick for the capricious.
Suing is the same as bringing a lawsuit. You're ineffectually splitting hairs. Still likely not effective. What's your point?
Your founder stock might not be yours
Hey HN! Just launched a newsletter to help founders avoid legal landmines and close rounds faster.

The first post is about an issue I saw often while practicing as a corporate lawyer for 10+ years: founders not owning their stock and having to do the paperwork all over again.

I share some tactical tips here on how it should be done. Feedback welcome!
I don't think you're looking honestly at yourself... Look at all the harm caused by humans! It's more or less all of it!

You might not be uniquely dangerous, but "general intelligence with an internet connection" describes Bill Gates, Rupert Murdoch, and Elon Musk just as well. These individuals seem at least as dangerous as our current generation of AI. (Or do they? I'm not sure I agree with myself here...)

Worth considering what makes an intelligence dangerous, because I don't think scale or even influence are the real problems here.
The developer claims that he assumed that he assumed that the database credentials were specific to the customer he was helping debug the problem. Once he realized that he could see other data, he closed the connection and notified the company.

I'd argue that a customer who accesses their own data on a vendor's database via a client has also the right to access it via a different client.
FIFO queues do not fix overload. Fair queuing queues, though, can fix it if the problem is coming from a specific source.

I have a web site set up that way. An in-memory table in MySQL is used to handle queuing for a slow operation. The queuing system has some fairness. This works well enough that one site sent bogus requests for a month at a high rate, and it had no effect on actual users.

Fair queuing in SQL:

SELECT domain, requestor_ip_hash, rating_state_int, base_domain FROM ratingqueue AS rqueue
WHERE (rating_state_int = 3 OR rating_state_int = 4)
AND NOT EXISTS(SELECT * FROM ratingqueue
WHERE base_domain = rqueue.base_domain
AND (rating_state_int = 1 OR rating_state_int = 2))
ORDER BY rating_state_int, request_timestamp
LIMIT 1;
It also has a better charity story, because "summarizing the knowledge of mankind" seems a tag more lofty than a social network.

(Even if that's not the case...)
Nope, it's off the top of my head, and partially proffered as a provocation to other professionals to protest.
Q: Why is the optimal lower bound zero and not "at least as long as you waited last time"?
Some of these are clearly troll posts.

This can't be an actual message from OpenAI though?

Thank you for considering OpenAI for your next career move. Amazing that you thought you had a chance. Try Microsoft.
>Sometimes we want it to mean a penetration that requires exceptional knowledge and effort. Sometimes we just want it to mean "fiddled with the internals".

oo-err
> Do you really think oncologists (pediatric oncologists!) aren't eager to cure their patients?

Don’t be bloody ridiculous.
By exposing vulnerable graphics drivers to arbitrary web code, WebGL has allowed websites to take screenshots of your desktop (https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2013-8...) and break out of virtual machines (https://blog.talosintelligence.com/nvidia-graphics-driver-vu...), to use two examples I found via a web search.
Housing Vouchers Won't Solve America's Homelessness Crisis
Me too! Having your own working CPU design running actual programs is a whole different rush. Hopefully this year I can get mine running on an FPGA.
Like WT Social?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WT_Social

https://wt.social/
Yes, he logged into the server using the credentials embedded in the app. Since the server contained information from other users, this would clearly be some kind of crime if used this access maliciously or maybe even if he just logged in knowing that he wasn't supposed to be allowed to.

But I think the salient point here is whether or not he could have known that before logging into the server. Since the credentials are in the app, should he assume that the company's security is so bad that this would give him access to all their customer data? He is obviously allowed to use the app, and the app uses these credentials so it's not too much of a leap for him to think that he should be allowed to use them as well.

Regardless, I think the result of this ruling will clearly be bad for computer security. In the future maybe someone who finds a vulnerability like this won't report it out of fear of legal retribution.
An actionable feedback is quite good. To be fair, when recruiting we usually pass the feedback to those nice HR folks, who basically throw them away.
Beautiful image: thanks.
Something I was noodling on is, what happens to SAFEs during acquisition? I'm assuming the investor gets cashed out based on some share price?
Ads (along with nazis and pedophiles) are the root of almost all issues on the internet and it looks like a very bleak future if we can't build an alternative form of compensation into our protocols. I don't understand why we can't at least outbid the advertisers for our own attention.... what a waste of time and money and attention and culture all around.
More PBC vs non-profit info[0]:

> Benefit corporations are neither nonprofits nor hybrid nonprofits. Benefit corporations are for-profit corporations that need to consider stakeholders, morals, or missions in addition to making a profit for their shareholders. Nonprofits can't be benefit corporations, but they may create one. Due to the public benefit purpose provisions, expanded fiduciary duties of administrators, and extra shareholder rights created within the model benefit corporation laws, this structure may be helpful to operate and scale the earned-income activities of a nonprofit.

[0] https://www.upcounsel.com/public-benefit-corporation
My favorite rejection letters are of the "We received an overwhelming volume of well-qualified applicants" sort. Especially when it's for a position that's so niche that you know there's a good chance that you personally know most of the other people who would actually meet the stated requirements.
Are Health Administrators to Blame?
That was a long time ago. Yet we still have bufferbloat problems. Sigh.
Already 403 Forbidden when looking from an EU country.
Am I misunderstanding, there is a bunch of vSphere offerings on the list there, but surely they must still sell vSphere in some form to enterprises?

Isn't it still common to find as a significant part of most on-premise deployments?
> we had 30 minutes to decide

The older I've gotten the more I've been in these kinds of situations.

As a kid you are shielded from stuff, and it catches people so... unprepared.
Yes. I got rejected, and then a couple months later they figured out that the role they were trying to fill wasn't actually what they were looking for. I was hired, stayed for 4 years, and built out the team. It was a success.
I think the .999 repeating thing has more to do with how we teach limits, people struggle to understand how two things that look definitionally different are the same because the rationale isn't well motivated. I had a professor that framed the whole process as an argument which was much easier to grasp, and I can easily imagine most people just getting a lecture or two on the equations and the implications.

Plus phrasing it as 'equals' or 'are the same' sort of puts the challenging part right in the front. Focusing on the difference more naturally leads you to the same conclusion.
"Lift and Shift" cloud VMs is going to be MORE expensive than on-prem.

Sure you CAN do it but not advisable.
I usually discover after years that these climate action movements were actually sponsored by Russia. It has already happened with the fracking. But then it's too late because they've already produced effects.
https://archive.is/6K7a7
Cool, there's consensus between APIs on how to expose "tensor cores" now? Very exciting! Although I think that relaxing memory limitations and providing more visibility and control there is even more important for running ML on the web right now. And harder to make progress on because there isn't a single team that clearly owns "all memory management".
There should be a web quiz "VMWare Product Name" or "Scifi-book technology"
Amazing story. Thanks for sharing. For all of us who work in drug discovery the hope is to hear cases like yours become more common and hopefully one day we can push cancer out of the range of common causes of death. There is still a ton of work to do.
Global warming is a second order effect of abundant CO2 production.

Why does your second order effect count, but not readily available sterile hospital materials made of petroleum?
You've missed that the ultimate problem is this assumption that there even exists one singular "best" way that should be implemented uniformly top-down. Some people will be happy using secure passwords and a local password manager. Others will be happy with no password but an email/SMS challenge. Some will prefer setting up a menagerie of security keys. Any many will prefer different mechanisms for different sites, depending on what a particular site means to them. Infantilizing people and trying to protect them in spite of themselves never works out, but rather just makes for a race to the bureaucratic bottom where everyone suffers death by a thousand paper cuts.
> I don't think people believed network congestion was a buffer allocation problem.

Actually, they did, because everything in the early days had very small memory sizes. This was the 16-bit era.
Yes, an acquisition would trigger SAFE conversion. Investors would be paid out according to their converted equity percent.
We’re getting downvoted by the “I have no clue about how the criminal justice system works” brigade.
I understand, but that doesn't mean I don't want to yell into the void about it.
I wonder how much of this is just their salary depending on the hiring market being as inefficient as possible. Seems like clear communication could go a long way to reducing HR workloads.
> Thank you for considering OpenAI for your next career move. Amazing that you thought you had a chance. Try Microsoft.

This can't be real.
I was head of technology for another "make a better world" social network, and we approached fostering positivity as a practice of encouraging constructive interaction and discouraging _destructive_ interaction.

In other words, being directly abusive toward others was obviously destructive and discouraged, but disagreement, even when quite strong, was great, as long as everyone involved maintained a level of basic respect when interacting with each other.

There's also a big difference between vehement dislike of a distant thing, concept or person, especially if one can express their reasons well, and using slurs or advocating violence or harm. I imagine here they used 'hate' to stand in for 'hate speech', but not being in their minds - I really don't know.
Hm.. I don’t see that distinction in this case.

To me when they say they “follow the science” it does not imply an end state. To me it only implies “everything we know so far”.

I am sure that if scientific results showed the opposite of their current idea, they would once again update their view.
A lot of companies won't say why for fear of litigation
EU Commission Intends to Block Amazon's iRobot Acquisition
my understanding is that the word "concentrated" does a lot of heavy lifting, and modern thought is that most cancers started spreading cells all over the body, even at very early stages.

metastatic cancer is a numbers game. for example. at stage 0-1, you might still have millions of cancer cells throughout your body, and there is a good chance your immune system can clean them up. At stages 2 or 3 there might be trillions of non-local cancer cells, with a proportionally greater chance of propagation.
You keep pretending that this problem can be solved if everyone "just" ditched iPhones for Android or Windows Phone or Symbian or whatever. Sorry to disappoint you, but this is not how the world works.
No she hasn't. You offer no support for your claim. I'd rather hire her than you and I have been industry for over 30 years.
Ubiquiti did that[1], didn't work out so well[2].

1. https://www.home-assistant.io/blog/2018/04/12/ubiquiti-and-h...

2. https://www.home-assistant.io/blog/2019/05/03/update-from-th...
Mexico is a large country with a very liquid labor supply
The Significance of the Frontier in American History (1893)
Sure, great example!
% head -1 | tr -d \\n | shasum

Type your username and press the RETURN key.
Now try 430Hz.
I think they're specifically mad about the app installing itself automatically. Free first-party content is fine, but preinstalling it for each user feels like borderline-promotion. Similar to the "generous" U2 giveaway that some of us still have as scars on our Apple Music library.
In his defence, unforeseen new shiny objects have since emerged for Zuck to chase.
Show HN: Header only C++23 library for gamedev (back end agnostic)