skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> and in a few years likely to create short movie sequences all based upon a prompt

It depends on the director and style of the era, but average "shot length" runs between 5 and 14 seconds. Six months ago companies were already demonstrating AI generated, 20 second shots (albeit with low motion, like slow pans) with the background staying mostly the same. I would probably upgrade this statement from "likely to create" to "almost near certainty".
What parent? The comment I'm replying to has no parent and the article has no mention of a gun
> I was making the point that it's a North American thing

No you weren't. To use your style, if YOU want to play along and be pedantic, then your edit wasn't about North America, it was about just the U.S. and Canada.
Gary Fisher is a literal forefather of mountain biking. "Fisher Mountain Bikes" predecessor was just called "MountainBikes," because "mountain biking" wasn't a thing when they started.
Show HN: Find the perfect job after answering three questions
Yep, we're doing RAG-ish search and ranking across many context types and modalities, you definitely can't just use a vectordb and do some chunking/search, there are a wide variety of search-like ranking, clustering, etc. and domain specific work for relevance and it's very hard to measure and prove improvements.

It's going to just evolve into recreating the various search and ranking processes of old just on top of a bit more semantic understanding with some smarter NLG layered in :). It won't be just LLMs, we'll have intent classification, named entity recognition, a personalization layer, reranking, all that fun stuff again.
Seems to be just reporting on the research already discussed yesterday https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39013497

HN Guideline:

> Please submit the original source. If a post reports on something found on another site, submit the latter.
I was affected by layoffs in December and wanted to make the job searching experience a little more enjoyable!

How it works: After a short conversation about your experience and preferences, LLM's are leveraged to determine what queries to run on the database, those results are then scored (using LLM's) to pick the best matches for you.

Data used is the past three months of HN "Who Is Hiring" thread comments, but I am actively expanding it.

Please let me know what you think!

P.S - The search can take a while!
20% of the article have been removed on September 6th
Maybe you missed the part where my employer pays the $25k/year on my behalf. Though your condescension is noted, everyone clearly knows what insurance is and it should be abundantly clear why it's so problematic. Maybe worth noting in that same time period, my insurance company reported nearly $150 billion in profits after paying their entire corps of middlemen and rent-seekers, who as far as I can tell soley exist to mididentify routine procedures and billing codes in the hopes that I won't have any more patience to sit on hold and get it corrected.
That 2 minutes is nice, in Poland a checkout station that was abandoned is blocked until an assistant notices it, so more like 30 minutes.
GPL'ed material is still copyrighted. You mean only proprietary licensed, I presume?
This might have been necessary at some point but if you sync your notes with icloud then they can be exported by logging into privacy.apple.com and clicking "request a copy of your data"

You can also get your icloud drive and photos this way.
The benefit is that the site gets to serve all the backstory to the search engine crawler to boost the ranking, while real people can go right to the recipe.
The issue is that the computer-generated proofs operate at a very low level, step by step, like writing a program in assembly language without the use of coherent structure.

The human proof style instead chunks the parts of a solution into human-meaningful "lemmas" (helper theorems) and builds bodies of theory into well-defined and widely used abstractions like complex numbers or derivatives, with a corpus of accepted results.

Some human proofs of theorems also have a bit of this flavor of inscrutable lists of highly technical steps, especially the first time something is proven. Over time, the most important theorems are often recast in terms of a more suitable grounding theory, in which they can be proven with a few obvious statements or sometimes a clever trick or two.
I do regret having kids and getting married. I love my family. Love isn’t the issue. I would much prefer my freedom.
It’s not that cut-and-dry:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_copyright>

<http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/againstfinal.ht...>
Total blast from the past. Xgrid[0] used BEEP for its inter-node communication protocol. I haven't thought about any of this for almost 20 years now...

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xgrid
You can though? But so can any buyer ...
Yet Person A, who just sold his startup and is sitting on $10M is objectively better off than Person B, who is making $200K a year at a normal job in tech. All other intangible things being equal, Person A's wealth will earn him $2-400K a year just sitting there doing nothing, giving him the choice to go get a normal job if desired, or not, or do anything he wants to do for fun, or not. That startup sale bought him the option to do whatever "makes him tick, makes him feel alive, and ultimately makes him happy" Whereas Person B has no option--if he wants to keep his $200K lifestyle he needs to keep grinding.

I'd trade places with Person A any time!
Is that even the case? Who would read a small time writers fiction book through chatgpt? Most of the use cases I've seen for chatgpt, e.g. Translation, conversation, brainstorming, reformulation, summarization are wholly different from the dataset of books. I would say that the art generators have a stronger claim of competing with their work than llms
That's what TFA actually says in the body; the problem is general, none of the major search vendors have a "magic bullet" to cut through the noise right now. Leave it to the Register to headline it with one instance (the most popular one) for clickbait purposes.
It might have to do with recipes like fasion not being copyright therefore easily copied.
> all choices in life have trade-offs

> I invite them to attempt writing a few million words. It will give one a very considered view on one’s own style.

That it will! I recently went from [not writing many documents] to [writing a ton of documents], and it turbocharged my reflecting-on-style background process.

Thanks again for your documents over the decades!

...and as a quote in HPMOR put it:

> Apparently people who were in books actually sounded like a book when they talked.
> Louisiana Chemical Association President Greg Bowser responded to President Biden's remarks on the region, refuting claims that residents of the industrial corridor have a higher risk of developing cancer in multiple articles.

I don't doubt his sincerity...but this illustrates how far people are willing to go to keep power. It is sad to think that a person would ignore evidence that their business kills people to protect profit. This is why we need strong regulatory bodies.
Money is no more real than copyright.
On Mac I can recommend MeetingBar [1] for that.

[1] https://meetingbar.app/
What note taking system do you recommend ?
To be fair if you had read just the conclusion section of the whitepaper you'll find that the research doesn't actually answer the question.
Does Reddit have any special controls to stop astroturfing or fake reviews?
This Github repo was previously released with this license:

https://github.com/id-Software/DOOM/blob/77735c3ff0772609e9c...
After flying from Davos to Zurich on helicopters and boarding the modified Boeing Co. 737, Blinken and his party were informed that the aircraft had been deemed unsafe to fly. An oxygen leak detected previously could not be remedied.

"Maintenance" is a bit of a euphemism.
Thanks for the correction, it looks like you're right.
So you prefer, the DSL or GPL over GPLv2? The Doom Source License (or DSL) is the original source code license under which the Doom source code was released in late 1997.[1] I'll take this over the years and years the past licensing has caused any day.[2]

[1]https://doom.fandom.com/wiki/Doom_Source_License#:~:text=The....

[2] https://www.doomworld.com/forum/topic/44358-doom-license-amp...
Isn't that what Clockwise (https://www.getclockwise.com/) aims to do?
My PWA is used on Apple products and I developed it with the intent of being used on Apple Products. I cannot control if a user uses a non Apple product. I cannot be expected to restrict what products my users use to access my product.

Added:
I will also add that the icons I'm using are very basic. Found in many ui kits. The minus symbol, arrows, trash can. The only one that is recognizable to the trained eye is that I'm use the copy symbol (two pages). So if it's going to be an issue for that one I would be fine to use something from Google. I just want Apple to know that I'm on team Apple. I want people to use Apple products. When they come out with SwiftUI Kit for web, I will be the first user. For a product like mine, most users are iphone users.
Wouldn't the grant given through section 5 of GitHub TOS [1] apply here?

That says "you grant each User of GitHub a nonexclusive, worldwide license to use, display, and perform Your Content through the GitHub Service and to reproduce Your Content solely on GitHub as permitted through GitHub's functionality".

In other words, without an explicit license you can do whatever you like with publically viewable content as long as it runs via GitHub.

[1] https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/github-terms/github-t...
If the only way for humanity to continue to exist was to eradicate every single other species on earth, I would do it.

There IS something distinctly unique about humans, and it's ludicrous not to acknowledge. We're the only species having this abstract conversation. We're the only species that is capable of leaving this planet, and thereby surviving a cataclysmic event we have no control over like an incoming asteroid.

Now, I think that some humans take this chauvenism too far and actively resist restraining themselves - consuming anything and everything, as if it was placed there for our taking. I happen to believe that's simply unprudent. The quality of life of humanity on Earth where we're the only other form of life would be too horrifying to imagine. But I still maintain my original premise that if that was the ONLY way for humanity to continue existing, it would be worth it.

There is no dignity in extinction. If our blip on the universe was simply to be born, briefly experience consciousness and self-awareness, and then disappear, it would've been for nothing. The universe's greatest tragedy is it's tendency towards entropy, and we're the only part of the universe that is actively working against entropy, trying to reverse it.

We must survive, grow, and take control of the universe - in conjunction and partnership with any other equally sentient beings we discover.
In the last six months model size has come way down and quality has gone way up through different training styles/methods. There is an incentive to release separate models capable of running on 8/16/32gb ram. On my laptop I have something like six free/open source models installed. LLMs are getting so easy to make that people are doing this in their spare time as a hobby. This is starting to feel like a small stepping stone towards AGI but only time will tell.
When I saw the title I thought they released the source for Doom 3...
The judge in this ruling found that Apple does not have a monopoly, so it wouldn't matter either way.
I don't think this fixes much? People will just use open source image generators. Artists still have the same dilemma.
I'll give you that at large events, but I'm talking 1-10k sized events with 25+ sheriffs deputies and city cops sitting in their cars. It was was negotiated with the city to have so many LE officers there as a condition of the permits. Seems more like a form of tax and compliance. They literally do nothing though. Every event I witness obviously drunk people driving out of there right by the cops with their heads in their phones.

It's my anecdote that I'm trying to make the point with; these - supposedly - highly trained folks with very expensive equipment are being called in to do all kinds of work for which that training and equipment are unnecessary. There is an opportunity for other folks with more directed training and equipment to fill these roles in society.
One is that the previous note said for non-profit use which could be interpreted as part of the license terms I suppose? While now it’s specifically under the GPL you can sell the source and any modifications.

But as you say the assets are still not covered and there are already more modern engines to play doom under other licenses anyway so…
Meta has definitely evolved from a LAMP stack!
Nope. Historically Doom was released by ID software under Doom Source License. Quite different from GPL in general.
I just want to check: what point are you attempting to make?
This is at almost the polar opposite end of the spectrum from "AGI," it's centered on brute search.
Not being able to get you resume down to a single page, shows a lack of attention to detail. You can't tell which of these 120 bullet points are the most important? You are just blasting me with info and hope I figure it out? I bet your code is way too verbose as well :)

Now if I am hiring a CEO with 30 years of experience, you can have a second page. But never actually hired for something like this, so maybe I would see the same trend and still prefer 1 page.
I imagine all the media attention is due to the door plug fiasco with everyone piling onto any news about Boeing aircraft (even if it's not really even worth talking about).

It's a shame that the MAX tarnished the 737's history of reliability.
Apart from houses and land where mortgages have been around for hundred(s?) of years, loans for consumer items were never a common thing until about the end of WW2. You either paid cash for something or you went without it.

There was no 'Buy Now, Pay Later' until laws were changed to allow that to happen somewhere around the 1950s when "Hire Purchase" became a thing.

Not long after that, the first Credit Cards appeared, which made purchases possible without having to go through the rigmarole of a specific loan arrangement each and every time you bought something. Arrange one credit card loan and buy whatever you want up to the limit on the credit card.
""The hallmark of good science, however, is the ability to make testable predictions, and climate models have been making predictions since the 1970s. How reliable have they been?

Now a new evaluation of global climate models used to project Earth’s future global average surface temperatures over the past half-century answers that question: most of the models have been quite accurate.""

https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2943/study-confirms-climate-mo...
AFAIK before the commit Doom was under a more restrictive license [1]

" For educational purposes only, you, the
end-user, may use portions of the Source Code, such as particular
routines, to develop your own software, but may not duplicate the
Source Code, except as noted in paragraph"
[...]

" Under no circumstances shall you, the
end-user, be permitted, allowed or authorized to commercially exploit
the Software. Neither you nor anyone at your direction shall do any
of the following acts with regard to the Software, or any portion
thereof:

Rent;

Sell;

Lease;

Offer on a pay-per-play basis;

Distribute for money or any other consideration; or

In any other manner and through any medium whatsoever

commercially exploit or use for any commercial purpose."

[1] https://github.com/id-Software/DOOM/commit/4eb368a960647c8cc...
Are there other examples where the law crushed fundamental technological shifts?

(Not just delayed briefly by starving investment or something.)
If a person plays a song similarly enough, then it is copyright infringment! Mere knowledge is irrelevant, it is the producing of copies (and also a few related actions) which is prohibited by copyright.
So Israhell defense is Hamas while IDF and IOF are spies, terrorists,rapists,child murders,and whatever else the scum of the earth could possibly be.
Maybe I’m not understanding the directionality of this integration.

I have items in a Notion database that have dates, status, dependencies, notes, etc. which are assigned to me the user (as a Person property using the Assignee type)

I have set up Notion Calendar and connected it to this same workspace.

The Notion calendar is not showing these assigned Tasks.

Is this meant to be used in reverse where you create an event in the calendar and add links to Notion pages? How exactly is that different from just putting links to your Notion docs in an any calendar event description?

And is there any place in Notion to edit events as a database?
Retool also laid off people: https://www.teamblind.com/post/Retool-lays-off-customer-succ...
Yeah I live downtown and use delivery all the time because it's way less hassle/stress/time than me taking transit or spending 5 minutes just to get my car out of my garage and going down the street then another 15-25 to drive the 2-3 miles one-way to get there with no parking, so another 5 minutes at least looking for that.

It's really annoying when delivery comes up here or on reddit and 90% of the comments are from people who live in the suburbs, or obscenely frugal and that drive everywhere telling everyone else that they should "stop supporting delivery companies they're gouging you." Like, no kidding. It's convenience. And some people are disabled, no cars, disposable income, etc.

If they lived where I lived with no car they would be absolutely mind blown at how much of a pain in the ass and how long it actually takes to go to my pharmacy (3.5 miles away, 20 minutes one way via car, 45-60 bus, I'm in a food desert) and back without their cars. And a huge portion of the population has to deal with that to pick up prescriptions, groceries, etc. I WFH and I have to schedule 2 hours off work every 2 weeks to drive *4* miles to get my haircut (cuts about 35 mins, drives about 30 minutes one way) and I still come back 10-20 minutes late all the time.

I'll happily pay the $5-15 extra to not deal with any of it.
I live in a small town. When I hired a developer locally, I basically posted it as:

* 2-3 years in Vue, React, Angular, or any modern JS framework

When I posted it for remote only I advertised

* 2-3 years of Vue experience

Had you emailed me in the first one with react? Cool, interview. But if you emailed me in the second, I would have skipped over. The bigger the pool, the more picky I can be.
> One of the big factors is whether or not AI can stay in the hands of the public or if it recedes into levels of hardware that only companies can own. If the latter, then the control will win.

Both will win. As corporations will make more and more advanced models, training data generated by their models will uplift open models. They only lag a few months. We already can shrink most of chatGPT's abilities in a 7B model. All open models trained after 2022 are benefiting from their big brothers. It's too easy to exfiltrate skills from proprietary models.
Users and (at least before the last run through the meat grinder) moderators.
The source code was released first under some custom non-profit license in 1997, then under the GPL in 1999. From what I can tell, those are the only licenses which the DOOM source code has been released under, and I can't even find any info on that non-profit license from 1997 release.

Are you referring to the license from 1997 here..? Or have there been other source code licenses which pages like Wikipedia and the DOOM wiki don't mention?

EDIT: someone else in this thread linked this: https://doom.fandom.com/wiki/Doom_Source_License. And:

> The DSL is significantly more restrictive than the GNU GPL, and as such is incompatible with it. For example, any form of commercial exploitation is forbidden. Heavy restrictions apply to the distribution of copies of the source code; the license grants permission only for the distribution of portions of the code for "educational use". The DSL is not an Open Source license (under the Open Source Definition) or a Free Software license.

Surely that's not a very attractive alternative to the GPL?
You quoted someone who stated they are not happy with C23, and deflected personal blame for that issue.

If I'm only trolling, then why, having learned about this, am I having to go into code and make defensive fixes?
This reminds me of years back when I worked in banking. I vaguely recall there was a report system called Hyperion(an?) (IBM?). The system generated a new database for every single report it made. I thought that was kinda crazy at the time but I guess it was ahead of the times.

Someone feel free to correct my memory if needed, I was not the primary person for this system or anything so I could be totally wrong.
lol is that a bad joke? GPLv2 is better
Your project sounds interesting as well. Do you have a social channel or GitHub for this project? Or is there something I can follow to be updated when you release it?

I'd love to learn more about what you're working on as I've been wanting to integrate shadeup with existing game engines like unreal/unity but realizing it would be a massive undertaking.
We probably won't get much further going back and forth on this. For what it's worth, you seem very reasonable, I've appreciated your comments for a long time, and I'm sure we'd get along fine if we were to work together.

I think you could let Linus off the hook by trying to find the kernel of truth as you suggest, and that seems to be the way key Rust team members work. There's been plenty of needless rancor in HN comments about Rust and you can see people like @pcwalton just not engage with the emotional content while still continuing to engage with the technical points. I'm personally impressed by this, but wouldn't be surprised if it contributed to the burnout.

Should we all aspire to be like that? Doing so seems like the human communication equivalent of Postel's Robustness Principle, which sounds great but in practice leads to shitty implementations getting away with being shitty because of the "robustness" on the other side. Maybe the better play here, especially with asynchronous communication, is to expect people come back to their message draft when they are not so pissed/emotionally triggered and then snip out tangential emotional crap. Especially the ragey condescending stuff.
As many other comments mention, copyright is as real as contract law or money.

A more correct statement with the same thrust would be "copyright is not _natural_ -- it's an artificial, bolt-on construct."

And yet lots of artificial constructs are useful for incentivizing / de-incentivizing massed behavior in a way that is maximally beneficial to all. For sure, getting it right is difficult but let's not write off all artificial constructs as worthless or impossible to get right (especially when you just have to get it right _enough_).
Any web developer seriously asking for yet another web prompt is delusional. The web in general has suffered because prompts enrage and discourage users. We, collectively, need to rein in the ability of websites to bother us. It's what's needed to protect our privacy, and save our sanity.
I live in a small town. When I hired a developer locally, I basically posted it as:

* 2-3 years in Vue, React, Angular, or any modern JS framework

When I posted it for remote only I advertised

* 2-3 years of Vue experience

There are _SO_ many applicants for a remote job (1000s), that I can be picky. So I will cut to the 500 that have the language I want, vs a slog through 5,000 that can maybe someday do what I want.

When you run a business and hire, you can totally do it different.