skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Bogus DMCA takedowns are thrown at people all the time for stuff like this, and Google already hardly cares to hear your argument against the notice.

The automated system you're talking about is called Content ID and is "not DMCA".

DMCA is a legal statute, which is where copyright holders expressly file a notice to YouTube that they're hosting infringing content, and getting one as an uploader will lead to an account strike.

Content ID is completely separate from any legal mandate (besides the settlement Google made with Viacom). In fact, it's even separate from Copyright entirely; YouTube is under no obligation for Content ID to operate only on copyrighted content. If YouTube was willing, they could take a paycheck from Disney to keep Steamboat Willie stuff protected by Content ID, since it's their own system and their own rules.

For this reason, the process for Content ID appeals is tougher - it's in YouTube's best interest to keep videos claimed, particularly if they need to appease rights holders[0] who hold all the cards for whether or not their music is available on YouTube. If it were a DMCA notice instead, you would have a legal right to counter the DMCA notice (under fair use) and get your video reinstated, unless the rights holder tells YT they have filed suit against you.

0: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-42420218
That’s very industry-dependent. I worked in a tech company that acquired a creative production company, and the tech leadership attempted to impose a metrics-based approach to what was a traditional creative process. That process had obvious signs of waste, including a high failure rate, excess travel expenses, etc., when compared to averages.

The result of this approach, centered on metrics, ranking, making lists and using “objective data”? They almost killed the golden goose. The successes dropped off and the averages declined. The tech side finally had to back off, and those people are back to acting like they always did.
Writing such a beautiful article in the midst of such a tragic moment proves your talent. I almost feel like I'm committing a blasphemy because I'm immensely moved by your article. Huge respect.
Its the internet. You can just decieve people anonymously even if its illegal.
>Are there any true open-source LLM models, where all the training data is publicly-available (with a compatible license)

Mamba has a version, trained on publicly available SlimPajama. RedPajama-INCITE was trained on non-slimmed version of the dataset(it's only one dataset).

I'm not sure if training scripts are available.

Pythia definitely has scripts. However it was trained on the pile, so you have to find books3 on your own.

Also I believe LLM360 is an explicit attempt to do it with llama.

>Is training nondeterministic?

Correct. Torch documentation has a section on reproducibility of a training.
The idea for a canal through Nicaragua goes back to at least the 1880s, when agents for the bankrupt French canal company tried to lobby for the US Government to buy the remaining assets.

Source: https://www.amazon.com/Path-Between-Seas-Creation-1870-1914/... - it's one of the most fascinating books I've ever read. It covers engineering, geography, 19th century stock market investing, medical advances, and the birth of US state capacity to run projects. Highly recommended!
Over this past holiday my very ill uncle excitedly told me about Dr. Oz's new diabetes cure, endorsed by Tom Hanks, that he was considering. Infuriating.
Google is almost useless since a few years now. Generative AI might have made it worse, and more obvious, but Google not going anything about aggressive SEO practices was already the beginning of the end.
You also see plenty of the opposite. For example one of the latest Apple stories is the patent lawsuit for pulse oximeters. HN is notoriously anti-patent so if the target was any company other than Apple, Microsoft, Google or one of the other "big baddies" they would be defended vigorously here. Instead you see lots of comments celebrating the shakedown.
Sundar.

Should have been let go years ago, but I guess the pandemic money explosion made it easy for him to show big returns.

But look between the margins and it's clear google is rotting on the inside. Search sucks. Gemini a year behind (despite google inventing transformers). Canceling products left and right leaving no consumer faith in new offerings. Cloud platform being an absolute terrible experience, even if you have a rep inside too. Internal power groups crippling anything that isn't deemed sufficiently DEI compliant.
Come Guadagnare un Secondo Reddito con eToro: Investi in Criptovalute, Oro e Materie Prime

Negli attuali scenari finanziari, la ricerca di opportunità per generare un secondo reddito è diventata sempre più rilevante. Un modo intelligente e accessibile per farlo è attraverso gli investimenti online, e in questo contesto, eToro si distingue come una piattaforma affidabile e versatile.

Investire in Criptovalute: Le criptovalute, con il loro crescente interesse e valore di mercato, offrono opportunità uniche. Su eToro, puoi esplorare una vasta gamma di criptovalute, dalla familiare Bitcoin alle più nuove e promettenti.

Oro e Materie Prime: Investire in beni tangibili come l'oro e le materie prime può essere un modo stabile per diversificare il tuo portafoglio. eToro offre accesso semplice a questi mercati, consentendoti di sfruttare le fluttuazioni dei prezzi a tuo vantaggio.

Genera Reddito Passivo: Oltre a beneficiare dalle variazioni di prezzo, eToro offre strumenti per generare reddito passivo. Copia i trader esperti sulla piattaforma e lascia che il loro successo finanziario contribuisca al tuo.

Iscriviti su eToro: Per iniziare questo viaggio finanziario, iscriviti su eToro attraverso questo link. La piattaforma è conosciuta per la sua affidabilità, facilità d'uso e trasparenza. Approfitta delle risorse educative offerte da eToro per prendere decisioni informate sugli investimenti.

In conclusione, eToro offre un'opportunità concreta per generare un secondo reddito attraverso investimenti intelligenti. Scegli la diversificazione del portafoglio e l'accesso a mercati promettenti. Iscriviti ora su eToro e inizia il tuo viaggio finanziario.
How much memory bandwidth do large Amazon instances offer?
This really feels like someone living in an echo chamber. Asking my extended family if they've ever used DDG or even heard of it would yield very low numbers and I have a large extended family. Most users don't even know you can use things within Google search like "site:" to attempt to control the results.

Just look at that list of bangs you provided. It's a techie/dev's wet dream of sources. Not one of them is something somebody's mom is going to give one iota of a concern about.
What problem does this solve that isn’t superficial? I don’t see why it’s important to include.
He warns it at the end https://hnreads.com/post/top40_2023/#fn:1
Only not having access to https://todo.sr.ht made me to recognize fully, that I don’t have any access to it. https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug suddenly looks much more interesting.
This is fairly common. Everyone handles grief differently and it doesn’t always line up with other peoples expectations.
The current popular approach is to use GraphQL, but the introduction cost of the entire solution is not low for the backend. Additionally, the frontend needs to manually write queries to describe fields, which lacks the smooth experience of directly using RPC-like requests.

The combination-oriented development model is to solve this problem. By using pydantic2-resolve , the router layer is responsible for building the schema to encapsulate changes, thereby avoiding changes to service and client.
Anecdotal but I found that I come across much less seo spam in general since switching to Kagi. I do use the feature to adjust certain domains’ ranking so these might just be the fruits of that.
What doesn't make sense about it, it doesn't directly drive an increase on a budgetary line item. Of course no one in finance areas is going to pay attention to it
Ask HN: Does it matter if music streaming platforms pay more?
On a regular basis, we get articles on HN on how Spotify et al. should pay artists more.

Put me right if I'm wrong...
but it's been my understanding that similarly to album sales, streaming doesn't contribute much to artists' earnings -- because the labels take most of that money.

Prior to streaming, majority of their income would come from gigs, merch (though often not because, again, labels) and marketing deals.

I'm more inclined to buy this when it comes to small artists -- they can't sell wildly popular merch, be a face of a brand, and gigs at a local bar don't pay well if at all. But then again, it's symmetric to their situation prior to streaming, and I don't see how streaming made it worse in any way.
On the contrary, I did discover plenty niche artists thanks to streaming.

What am I missing?
I was maybe on Buttons side but your checkmate won me over.
The concept of OAuth Scopes is even more silly when looked at through layman's eyes. If your experience with average humans is, that they will be able to make a judgement calls about wether an app they want to use can reasonably require access to a specific scope, you are not actually dealing with average humans.

Average humans will be at best insecure or indifferent in light of these choices as presented, but certainly not informed. I do think any system asking for these kinds of decisions should at least communication very clearly a recommendation about how to proceed and provide the necessary tools to judge if "permanently delete all calendars" is a reasonable request.

This could maybe be solved with a more thorough (maybe AI automated) review process and JIT OAuth requests (or more frictionless update requests) only when necessary in the app process.

I understand that it's simpler to pawn this off to the user in a roundabout way, but we need to be better and more compassionate with actual users.
I more or less agree (though I don't know about blaming the developing world so much given how little they've contributed to the problem in the first place!), and I'm certainly not trying to support Peterson's argument wholesale. But no matter how much it all makes sense in these terms, it's a really tough sell and I can totally see why. We live in a world which has made arguing for collective responsibility, a shared burden, virtually impossible – and that's certainly not down to the politics that I favour.
After skimming the first few paragraphs, I almost commented something similar to yours. But after reading it until the end, the problem is more nuanced than that.

The issue is more about reusing memory that has been allocated when you "convert" (in Rust term: into_iter()) a Vec to another Vec. More surprisingly, the reuse still happens even when the new Vec has a different type than the original Vec's type. You should read the whole post—it's more interesting than I (and you) thought.
> I know it's a bit of an outlier (SAH mother + WFH father)

Not much of an outlier.
if you could watch that voice, maybe it will shut up or u can make peace with it?
parse it to fat & eat!
It'd be interesting to hear some inside intel on how seriously is Google taking this.
Without an example of how you would prevent this, this article amounts to just whining.
> Saying that one isa is faster or more energy efficient is like saying that c++ syntax is faster than java syntax.

I think that could be a valid statement. APIs can influence performance by constraining the implementation. For instance, the syntax for constructing an object in C++ will, generally speaking, always yield faster code than Java, because Java objects are almost always allocated on the heap, while C++ objects can be allocated on the stack. Compare:

// C++
MyObj o{};

// vs. Java
MyObj o = new MyObj();

Sure, it's possible to write a Java allocator/GC that will yield similar performance to the C++ code, but in general, that will practically never be the case. The syntax of the language has constrained the implementation so that Java will practically always be slower. Presumably, similar design choices in an ISA could have the same effect.
From what I've heard about things like eIDAS there is considerable technical competence behind the specifications for these laws, I would expect there to be mechanisms for cryptographically secure offline validation.
I had a bike / ferry / bike commute a couple days a week for a while. It was nice to get that exercise in, and I enjoy ferry rides too.
You can't. "quantity over quality" is the most efficient path to maximum profit with minimum cost, thus the path capitalism will always optimize for, given no other incentives. Capitalism will capitalize, and AI looks as much like a magic money machine as any technology ever has.

The only thing that will stop this behavior is if AI generated content is proven to be less profitable than human generated content, which is a possibility if quality drops low enough, or the capabilities of AI versus cost stop making financial sense. But that has to happen at scale, and it might require a collapse of the tech industry in general, because everything, everywhere will be integrated with AI at that point.
> Deception used to hawk goods should not be ok.

Honestly, focusing on AI seems silly since the internet, at this point, is completely neck-deep in deceptive scams being pushed by reputable, mainstream, important orgs.

Google, Facebook, Amazon, etc. take in literal billions of revenue to show people scam ads. The scammers are directly paying them money - presumably these are not anonymous orgs, but people with credit card numbers and ID. And the big internet giants just gladly act as for-profit middle-men for ripping off confused elderly people, because reviewing the ads posted to their platform isn't practical.

Something has completely failed in enforcement.
The first demo on that page was trained from a 32kbps crappy sound quality clip of winston churchill...?

garbage in, garbage out?
>and I can't imagine how there would even be room for a field of view for one.

By making the walls transparent?
And Events -- they haven't quite nailed sorting events in chronological order. Maybe this is something leetcode should cover.
Librivox seems like a great source, being public domain, though the quality is highly variable.

I can recommend Elizabeth Klett as a good narrator. I've sampled her recordings of Jane Austen books Emma, pride and prejudice, and sense and sensibility.
They look into your finance box. Just to check your status.
y = Ax + e

Solved it
Going to take a while to adjust for this. Then we have to ask, where do all the writers get their info , how do they avoid it ?
Reminder that volunteering to moderate a site, on its way to a IPO, is a "community service" to the community...Of shareholders...

"Do you get paid for being a moderator on Reddit?" - https://www.reddit.com/r/NoStupidQuestions/comments/14345mi/...
That sounds very much like the SuperH ISA.
Solar desalination, perhaps?
Appointed ones aren't really any better. They all have biases. The system is just built in a way that they are untouchable. How do you control someone who you have no recourse against? Perhaps the elected ones have the most accountability, even if it forces those biases to be more present. Even things like judicial conduct complaints are considered so secret that you can't subpoena them even if they contain exculpatory evidence. Judges are able to be sued (at the state level anyways) and investigated on civil rights and color of law violations. It just doesn't seem to happen. Even something like admitting in a red flag hearing that they are erring on the side of caution is a violation. Yet nobody cares to investigate or pursue it.
I've generally had a 30-40min commute most of my career, but also generally had a flexible enough start time that exact to the minute arrival at my desk was not performance impacting.

Unfortunately a lot of things conflate over time as you become more senior to generally make your commute worse.

For me - my last 2 roles have earlier required start time, with a hard start (morning meeting / standup / L3 support presence), company office locations got a little further, and trains got a little less reliable.

Fortunately I am remote since COVID, but when I was going in / or have to go in now.. I need to bake in 45-60min depending on how much I'm willing to risk being late that day.

For me I'd rather work 11-12 hours/day at home then go into office for 10 hours & spend 1.5-2 hours on the commute. Company is getting 10-20% more time out of me, and I at least save the money & "commute prep time".
I can't imagine a C-suite determining literally anything about my team beyond allowing it to exist in the budget.

I worked at way too many startups where the CEO was far too involved with day to day minutiae.
Oh wow, I'll have to look into that. Were you concerned it might be counterfeit?
what happens if the links rot in your bookmarks?
The problem is, if you are running a marketing database of millions and and millions of distinct IDs, you have to get into very esoteric fingerprint factors. Anytime you have a driver update or switch devices, you lose the connection in the data.

https://medium.com/slido-dev-blog/we-collected-500-000-brows...

Can it track you for a bit and show you some ads? A little bit. But compared to a tracking pixel it is not even remotely as reliable.
What does it say about Kindle in the user-agent string? https://www.whatsmyua.info
Adobe has enough brand pull to convince consumers to check the scary little box warning them about installing software from outside the App Store.

This is not as easy for small companies with smaller brand footprints.

I am also making a prediction (that obviously could be wrong), that this scary little checkbox will eventually be deprecated in favor of a blanket ban.
i strongly disagree and i think you do too.

whichofthesesentencesdidyoufindeasiertoreadhowcouldyoueventhinkthatinthefirstplace
The part that got me was where he talks about his daughters helping out with the care.
> I think Horizon was anything but simple.

Yes, you're probably right. But this is the part that really bugs me :

"The inquiry heard that in 2008, a glitch in a system called CABSProcess, which automatically summarises a post office’s transactions at around 7pm daily, resulted in users working at the same time having balancing issues."

This, for an accounting system is just fucking inexcusable!

I worked on a huge accounting project for a financial institution processing 2M account bookings per day (at that time, it's a lot more now). A lot of effort was put into the audit log (every booking was written to an append only log) and into the reconciliation process. When it was 20 Rappen off there was digging until the inconsistency was found.

That transactions are not completely isolated when that CABSProcess kicked in is just completely and uttelry inexcusable.
I think the problem is that humans (and other animals) exhibit very different patterns of behavior than e.g. corporations. For example when a human is consistently nice to you, you start to assume that they are a "nice person" which entails things like they're likely to help you if you're in need (and hopefully vice versa). You model their behavior after how you behave yourself, e.g. that because I'd be worried if she is in trouble, she's probably worried if I'm in trouble.

There are no such "nice companies". They operate on a totally different logic and "DGAF" if they can get away with it. Apple's not gonna bring food to you if you're bedridden no matter how much you've spent on them.

I don't think it's anything philosophical. Just how you model and predict behavior of different kinds of entities. What's a thing of its own right is just a matter of conceptualization.
Flying kites deliver container-sized power generation
At the very least Apple should not be able to do this in categories it competes in. Charging Spotify 30% is hella anti competitive because they also have Apple Music.
Probably. There’s plenty of areas where you can be liable for speech without the 1st amendment being relevant.

There’s parallels to the test for incitement. If you say “Let’s go burn down the grocery store” while you’re out with your friends, and everybody chuckles and nobody does anything to burn down the grocery store, you’re pretty much free and clear of incitement. Your random outburst wasn’t likely to cause imminent lawless action.

If you shout “fire” in the theatre and nothing happens, nobody has been damaged and so there’s no civil claim. But if you shout fire and that leads to a stampede and I get hurt, I have a decent pitch for holding you liable for the harm your statement caused me.
Much of the watershed has been protected from development in order to ensure the water supply for the canal. Also, no matter the current level of pristineness/pollution, there's no way pumping millions of gallons of seawater per day would help.
>seeded our own destruction

I mean, you can always just not rely on the internet for news and narratives and such.

And yes it is possible. It is possible to work in this economy, raise a family, eat well, and not need to be bombarded by fake anything, whether generative AI or human authored.

I think the atomic bomb is more credible as a seed of human destruction.

By the way does anyone know anything about any launch codes?

Also - have you seen the whereabouts of John Connor?
How about something like "Sassy Justice", where the image is almost identical, the voice is similar, but where a different name is used and no claim is made to be Donald Trump?
this is only for the raspberry pi version of minecraft, right?
Well I certainly hope changes come to pass in that spirit, world-wide. I can see that happening in some wealthier countries, if you're lucky, and the right government is in power. I'd love to be proved absurdly pessimistic, of course.
Sorry, what does this have to do with the article?
If I were you I'd consider using

https://simpy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

inside a Jupyter notebook.
Today it might be China -> USA via Cape - which is a long way.
With all their recent extra efforts in AI research (Gemini etc) I wonder if they’ve given up on search being the core of their being and are committing to AI products ?
And how is the seed clouding that's occurring globally impacting this [it's very obvious now, for those unaware, there is GeoengineeringWatch.org and their documentary free on YouTube called "The Dimming"], as well as perhaps hurting crops and those local economies enough to shift power-buying power away from those food producers?
I think the light above you changes to blinking red, which they're expected to notice on their own but often don't.
Generic libraries. There are programming domains in the embedded world where code reuse can shorten the development timeline in a significant way, which gives engineers more time to test and verify.
Why don't you explain exactly what you think this article is insinuating, so we can compare that with the reality and demonstrate how you've been misled?

You said:

> The article gives very specific details about the fraud

So it shouldn't be hard.
Autoscaling is not going to help if you are IO-bound in your database. One point of the article is you have to identify your bottleneck before you can make sensible design choices.
For the Internet as a whole, yes, but not for this narrow case of legitimate news organizations. If Facebook could have building full of moderators to review flagged content on their site, Google could easily fix this issue with a team to handle reports of low quality AI content. Not to mention, how most of these sites sprung up out of nowhere. That should already be a red flag for the algorithm to de-rank until a human could review. And the example of reworded blog spam with identical photos, posted at a later date, again, should be trivial for a team that cared to catch manually(flagged) or through an algorithm.

It's not over, unless Google doesn't care enough about Google News to fix it.