skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I always hate findings of "pilot error." Like you, I don't want to minimise it, but it never feels like it gets to the root cause. It often feels a bit like scapegoating. Why did highly trained, presumably competent pilots make the error? How can it be avoided in the future?

As you say, UI design choices can make errors more or less likely. Absolutely everyone makes mistakes. We need to design to reduce the likelihood of mistakes and to minimise the impact of mistakes when they do happen.

To be clear, I think everyone in the industry understands this, but when reported in the media, the average public just hears, "Pilots f'ed up," which is almost never a complete picture.
> Seems like it could be great for small things, but unmaintainable at scale, and that all the praise is based on the former

Why does it seem that way? There are plenty of talks on youtube of commercial projects that switched from React to htmx and found considerable benefits.
There's libcello if you want to stay in C

https://www.libcello.org/
Yup something like 9/10 couples who lose a child end up separating and I totally understand
Some details are there, see the inquiry website. From what I gather the "covert" remote access could only add records rather than edit records. Like putting something on a message stack. However you could add a record to edit a balance I imagine. Where "records" are "messages". I don't think you could actually get money out that way only remotely. Also a record of the record would be made, you couldn't erase remote access activities on the stack.

I also don't think this capability was ever suggested anywhere as being used in conjunction with a postmaster to skim money out. Maybe its possible in theory?
Imagine getting something like DCMA takedowns because your voice happens to sound similar to someone famous or you look like someone else.
It’s been 15 years since I had a car, so things must have improved a lot, according to the replies in this thread.
Probably because it’s their value proposition. The point being Apple spends a shit ton of money on privacy and security because it’s exactly what they market. It’s a bit of a naive and paranoid take to think they’re secretly disregarding that internally and actually doing the complete opposite.
Samsung Internet is a really good browser though, definitely my favorite on Android
He is a stand-up comedian. Ron Paul rhetoric minus Ron Paul solutions or any solutions for that matter, which makes the whole routine even more bizarre.
I think you're getting your aircraft manufacturers mixed up. On all modern Airbus airliners, there is no physical link between the two pilots' controls at all. On Boeing aircraft, the controls are physically linked and both move even when one pilot is making inputs. On the 777-300ER, if both pilots are making inputs, and those inputs differ enough, then the physical link can be disabled and then the inputs are considered "desynchronized" and only then to the inputs become averaged.
I noticed chatgpt uses bing when searching now so expect the market share figure to go up
If Boeing was a student, they would be the kind that does the bare minimum in every class just so they don't fail.
8-truck convoy delivers giant German SANS to Argentina's Neutron Beam Laboratory
With the wrong demanding coworker or (especially) midwit middle manager who wants to talk about sportsball or politics, your entire company loses, not sure what your (rather sexist) point is tbh.

Distractions happen. They come from lots of sources.
Profit > Safety is the American way
> Android Server+Hosted Cloud Server+PWA seems a bit hacky though. And it's hard to beat free when you're on a low budget.

I self-host, so for me the practical free, sustainable option with all features included is Trilium. I'm generally wary of the freemium core + (no so) optional paid features + early access plans paid towards companies which haven't turned a profit yet. After all, that's how many people are now discovering Obsidian, while escaping an ever enshitifying Evernote.

> Keep also has some fairly unmatched deep integrations with Assistant and Wear OS.

Absolutely, if I want reminders and things showing up in GMail, Google makes sure that I can't adventure very far away from its walled garden.
The type of notes I take in Trilium are personal thoughts, family matters, logs of memorable activities (meetings, meals, outings, …), work notes, summaries, elements to later compose in deliverables or emails, that kind of stuff. And because this is all relational and "typed" in nature ("meetings" implies "places" and "persons", "deliverables" implies "projects" or even "milestones"), Obsidian just doesn't cut it.

Apparently, SiYuan, which is very much a competitor of Obsidian with an opensource core is in the process of implementing a basic version of Notion's "databases" [0]. It still falls short for my needs (no polymorphism to extend types, no cardinality to specify the type and directionality of relations), but it might be a big step forward for many people here having started on Obsidian and bumped into its limitations.

[0] https://liuyun.io/article/1697859885503
i dont think individual humans should own land
I bumped into him in conference some years ago and had some great chats. Only much later I realized he was the DJ from DJGPP. Missed my chance to thank for creating the compiler I used in my DOS teenager years!
Is there short term for the following phenomenon?

Articles for the general public create a false impression. This false impression becomes pervasive in public discussion. Later some events make it self-evident that it is not true. New articles come busting this myth and giving the impression that those who relied on technology believed it.
FINALLY the stackexchange cookie-dialog works (goes away) in old FF (68.11.0)!
You could go the Unreal route, will get you very far even wihtout code. Marketplace can be used to buy a lot of systems so you don't have to code them.
No research needed for that.

Even recipes nowadays are SEO boosted
Since most news publications are failing businesses I would not immediately assume they have considered all avenues of monetization.

I agree that ads have historically made a lot of money...but I am thinking of the paywalled industry. I am probably in the minority but I would be interested if any of the major publications had data on this kind of strategy. I realize there have been products including Flattr that did this but again I never saw it being using on a NYT level publication.

Instead of me reading an archive link or just not reading the article at all I would be happy to pay some cents to consume it.
Where are some examples, like HelloWord or Fibonacci?
never???
it is funny how just mentioning it starts another instance... the power of christ compells you!
That quickly becomes helicopter parenting. I've got two young kids myself and totally understand your struggle.
Thank you for writing this. They say that you don't know what you have until it's gone, but reading experiences like this reminds me how precious and fragile life is, so that I can more deeply appreciate the time I do have with my loved ones.
You need to use Edge to use it, right? That might be why.
The author has a page[0] wherein he notes his legal first name is "DJ" and that it is not appropriate to spell it in lower case, insert spaces or periods, etc. Also on that page, directly above that admonition, is an image with his name spelled in lower case. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

0 - https://www.delorie.com/users/dj/
At EDF, with the EPR2 design, e.g.

https://www.edf.fr/groupe-edf/produire-une-energie-respectue...
No, it's the opposite. Airbus does not use active side sticks; you get no haptic feedback from the other pilot. You do get an aural warning, "dual input," if split control inputs are detected, and each stick has an override button against the other side. See here[0].

Boeing's control columns are mechanically linked, but given (iirc) 50 lbs of force, they will mechanically desynchronize. If memory serves, they will snap back into sync once the force is released. I don't recall there being an aural warning for this.

The issues with Airbus's approach are that (a) in high-stress environments, aural warnings are the first ones to be unconsciously ignored, and (b) you get no haptic feedback, either from the other pilot's side stick, or from the control surfaces (since modern Airbuses are FBW, though you could still do electronic feedback via an active side stick). There's some talk of Airbus moving to active side sticks in the future to mitigate this issue.

The issue with Boeing's approach is that in a high-stress, tunnel-visioned situation, you can't tell another pilot's input feedback apart from something like jammed flight controls, a runaway stabiliser, or any other trim or autopilot malfunction, to name a few. There's also some talk of Boeing moving to active side sticks in the future to mitigate this issue.

[0] https://aircrafttechnic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Ads%C4%B1z-4.png
Publicly owned areas suchb as whiteface Cannon bellayre etc are still on the 95-125 for a walkup weekend adult ticket, with some significant discounts for multiple days and younger/ older people
Yep. It's the old "butts in seats" philosophy. The new one is "keep your Slack dot green" (or equivalent.) Many managers were always clueless what their staff are doing at the office. Many still are. It's incredible that we have all these tools (Jira, Asana, Github, Slack...) plus many are forced to give status updates in daily standups and other assorted "agile" nonsense, yet there are still those can't figure out what people are working on.
Have you ever had Nixta? It's a corn spirit with a very unique and pleasant flavor
It is inline css with all of the warts removed, eg. media queries are available, it exports a coherent design system rather than allowing any CSS, etc.
Are there situations where GPUs are compute bottlenecked at batch size 1? For the time being at least, that's how local models will be used.
They allow two free projects. I’m under that limit.
Thank you Lars for putting my mundane work issues into perspective and help me think about enjoying and appreciating what I have and stress (less) about what I don't, though that is the human condition. Stay strong.
By "dual input system" I was referring to the fact that both pilots can apply input into their sticks or trim wheels simultaneously resulting into inputs cancelling each other out or de-synchronizing.
There could be an infinite amount of junk, in fact the amount of junk available online before LLM output was added to the mix was already incredibly huge. At this point it no longer matters because you can take 1 or 2 examples of some knowledge you want to train a new model on and you can then feed it to an LLM with instructions saying to create 10,000 variations on this text while still retaining the factual details, you then filter this list and throw away any output with errors or other garbage and what you're left with are a good number of high quality examples of the information you want to add to your training set. Incredibly, there is new research that shows even this might not be needed at some point because there is evidence that transformers can learn from a single example.
Thats the boat I am in. I don't even care if they show me ads too, I just want to get around the paywall but I don't want to pay for a subscription.
That somebody is simply gone. It doesn't make sense to view it any other way.

It's not a disturbing view. However, as long as the affected person is not capable of suffering anymore it is fully up to the family to decide what they prefer. So either way can be a valid and ethical then. It can be ethical to hang on and it can be ethical to let go.

(That being said, If there is chance that the affected person could recover or even not recover but suffer at the moment then the question becomes very complex. I think most would admit that the complexity exists.)
I understand and appreciate your point, but I would like to point out there is a large segment of society that, if shown an article from The Onion, wouldn't realize it is satire.
Godot is really good. GDQuest does really nice tutorials for it: https://www.gdquest.com/tutorial/godot/learning-paths/godot-...
Wasn't the problem here that Boeing is only linked if no great force is applied and also switches to the average it the force difference is large enough, and that it didn't really document that behaviour?
The 2014 models are the last year Subaru had oil leakage issues. Looks like the 2015-'16 models are the sweet spot, as '17 is when they went with the rest of the industry and added Internet, app capability and all that nonsense.
Have ArchiveTeam save it to archive.org and donate to keep the service alive.
A Moment for Mullets
Thank you! That was a clear easy explanation.
Is this the new SQL "killer" ?
There is a nice video (Practical Engineering) that covers this very well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBvclVcesEE
No, it's an effective technique that has been used by Microsoft Research among many others.
This is one of those things where I wonder if it was too early for its success? I don't know the answer but it feels like it could have been. I have never seen it used on US based media unfortunately.
Ok, hear me out: Here is how to remove all unwanted ads from the Internet.
ISPs move to subscription-based billing - a flat base fee to cover their own costs and some profit, plus a 'content' fee that is divided among the sites visited and the bandwidth used. The 'content' fee goes to a global rights association that distributes it to creators.
I wouldn’t call it nothing either. I’d call it “actually getting a decent amount of exercise,” something many struggle with.
Congratulations! But it is easier to get traction here with a longer blog post with more detail and screenshots. (Remember to add a few nice screensots.)
Love2d is very approachable. Although not 3d, there is a version of it for developing 3D games. It uses lua, which a lot of his friends will be familiar with via Roblox.
> It's written consistently in all upper case in the copy text at https://www.delorie.com/djgpp/.

And consistently lowercase in the article linked in the post I was answering.

There is 10 years between the 2 links, seems the author changed their mind about introducing words with forced irregular capitalization.
At a certain point you just need to take a statistically representative sample of the output for review.
Wow, thanks for the info! It’s crazy that the article didn’t mention this and that no one interviewed seems to have been aware of it. Feels like a huge oversight, since with this info the change should have been basically unimpactful.
Is this company trustworthy?
I want to congratulate them on a good password, but they are probably a pedophile? So erm...
Hey, nice project, I enjoyed reading your code! I do the same thing and wrote a terminal mp3 player a while back in python (mpy3).

I really like the idea though of just having an "on/off" switch and not thinking about what's playing. Feels like a fun implementation- will definitely give it a go!
It’s a bold claim that getting married and divorced (vs not getting married at all) is a net win for women. Don’t move the goal posts.

Also I’m not going to read a whole book to try to figure out what point you’re trying to make with your link.
> On an Airbus both sticks have to mave in unison, they are physically linked.

Is that true? I seem to recall that Airbus gave "priority" to one side or the other (with the side being switchable on demand, not fixed).
It's really frustrating to watch this happen, first with using arrays to mean non void pointers, then with _Generic for dispatching on types, and now this. And the worst part to me is not necessarily that they're complicating or "bloating" C, because these are necessary features, the worst part to me is that they seem to simultaneously recognize these features are necessary, and not want to commit to a full and proper implementation of them like e.g. proper generics or simple templates. Instead they create stuff like this, where they haven't fully committed and so it's weird and awkward to use and doesn't feel fully integrated into the language, with less clear semantics, so in the end it ends up kind of worse than C++, whereas what I wish they'd do, if they're going to bring features from C++ to C, is just fully and properly implement the feature, but make it as simple and limited and basic as possible — the basic concept of templates and monomorphization makes sense to me, buy I'm not exactly sure how this works at compile time.

It this point, if I want generics, I'd rather just use C++.
I'd start with Scratch. Lots of well meaning advice here but Scratch is still the best for kids to build code and quickly see the product dance on the screen. Quick iteration time is the key to building a feelings of accomplishment.

We started with the book "Scratch Programming Playground" by Al Sweigart.

Now we are doing youtube tutorials by Griffpatch. One of the latest is a simple 3D raycast Wolfenstein clone, which might interest your son. However I recommend a simpler jumping on point, like his Geometry Dash series:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLy4zsTUHwGJJnoXPSYlKQ...
Remote attestation is absolutely part of the feature set of TPM. That is isn't used is because of the poor adaptation. So I wouldn't say it 'was' as scare. Of course there are different threats too.

Actually it is quite a current topic, because tech companies are interested in this for very obvious reasons that is not referring to your evil maid. Web integrity comes to mind.
Welcome to Sociology, see also Early Child Development.
Airbus has had a Priority Takeover button, from the start, I assume Boeing also has something like that. Its primary use case is exactly what you’re talking about, although it also disables autopilot so it’s a good way to ensure you have manual input in case you need to react quickly.

Airbus has a dual input alert, apparently Boeing doesn’t, and didn’t add it after this incident, blows my mind. Still they’re far from perfect, stress deafness is absolutely a thing.

Active sticks (force feedback) are finally making it into commercial cockpits, they’ve been deployed in business jets, and the Irkut MC-21 was supposed to be the first implementation in an airliner (as it’s french-made, that’s been sunk by the Russian invasion of Ukraine and subsequent economic blockade).

This means hopefully active stick swill make it into big two airframes eventually. I assume there’s some redesign work ongoing as it likely requires additional power and data connection, AFAIK currently the sticks (Airbus’s anyway) are just centered and resisting via springs, I don’t think there’s any data fed back into the sticks.
A Single Picture of Car Damage Can File Your Insurance Claim
A bit hyperbolic, I'm sure the different variations are finite but you can produce a very large number of examples with essentially the same information content.
Had this show up in a Facebook ad
Hm, cannot you just have a tree-way switch determining the active control (both, A only, B only)?
Corporations are not to be loved
So assigning a new meaning to a word?
_Bool etc. came with convenience macros defined from <stdbool.h> and so on, but _Generic never did, suggesting that the underscored version was meant to stay forever that way. (Otherwise it should have been named as something like _Generic_switch and later renamed to generic_switch...) Maybe _Type and _Var are similarily intended.
Gift link: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/11/dining/drinks/mexican-whi...
It appears that the two controls are physically linked, but have a 'fuse' mechanism. When the two pilots apply lower forces to their controls, the forces are transferred between the controls and they 'fight' each other to move the sticks. After a certain threshold (50 lbs?), the two controls move independently.

In all cases, the flight computer works of the average of the two sticks. When they are in sync, this works great. In a situation like this one, where the pilots are pushing in opposite directions, the average will all of a sudden, be quite different from both controls.
2 chatgpt instances controlling the dual inputs would be funny
The "but if he does not" from that passage is theodicy in a nutshell.
No worries. I understand.
Hopefully more like archive.org and less like Wikipedia or the search results will be as badly biased as most Wikipedia topics are which are even tangentially related to politically contentious subjects.
Would a space-filling curve be a better way to quantize and thereby address specific neurons of brains, relative to loci; or is there that much functional specificity anyway?

Read and write to brains affects chain of custody, so we'll probably need total recall for something like this; and an immutable ledger that stores admissable header/footer dates for documents.

And what about neuroantiinflammatories and neurogeneration in the hippocampus, while you're imaging with that resolution?
> Even recipes nowadays are SEO boosted

Good point, but before we get into that, let me talk about my grandmother for a moment. She was a great cook, eager to learning new recipes, especially with potatoes. Potato is a great plant, rich in essential vitamins, easy to cook, very healthy...
We have one manufacturer in the UK that still makes toasters here.

https://www.dualit.com/products/4-slice-newgen

Not their whole range though, the cheaper products come from China.
Why is that? Britain is covered with a preindustrial canal network with thousands of locks which use nothing but channels doors and gravity. Literally made of wood and operated by hand.

Raising water on the low side to the level on the high side simply requires joining the two sides together.

If sea level is their high side, I don't understand why they can't use this supply forever.
I don’t know Google, maybe you could try including the words I actually typed in the search field on your results page without me having to quote it.

Or respecting the checkboxes I set for language preferences when I’m abroad.

I’d try that first, you know? But maybe that’s just me.