skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Nothing stops you from having your null pointer in the middle of the address space. Some C compiler for DOS or early Windows did that IIRC (it was 0xB800 or something?.. so that it wouldn't accidentally corrupt the interrupt table). Also, C explicitly prohibits address wrap-around problems for pointers:

Moreover, if the expression P points to the last element of an array object, the expression (P)+1 points one past the last element of the array object, and if the expression Q points one past the last element of an array object, the expression (Q)-1 points to the last element of the array object. If both the pointer operand and the result point to elements of the same array object, or one past the last element of the array object, the evaluation shall not produce an overflow; otherwise, the behavior is undefined.

But this is fine, since pointer comparisons (as in, less/greater comparisons) are actually both pretty restricted and required to have reasonable semantics when comparing pointers that point into the same object/array:

When two pointers are compared, the result depends on the relative locations in the address space of the objects pointed to. If two pointers to object types both point to the same object, or both point one past the last element of the same array object, they compare equal. If the objects pointed to are members of the same aggregate object, pointers to structure members declared later compare greater than pointers to members declared earlier in the structure, and pointers to array elements with larger subscript values compare greater than pointers to elements of the same array with lower subscript values. All pointers to members of the same union object compare equal. If the expression P points to an element of an array object and the expression Q points to the last element of the same array object, the pointer expression Q+1 compares greater than P. In all other cases, the behavior is undefined.

By the way, this means that, among other things, if you use number N to represent a null pointer then number N-1 can not ever be a valid pointer to anything: adding 1 to a valid pointer is always allowed, and this addition should produce a non-null pointer — because the resulting pointer is required to be well-behaved in comparisons, and comparisons with null pointer are UB.
For me it's because there's zero line rather than a five minute wait or worse.

I'll do the work so I can save the time. It's a godsend that way.
I'm ready to jump ship and go to a capabilities based system, I've been patiently waiting for Genode to deliver something I could use as a daily driver, but it looks like they're going after phones instead.

I'd gladly help out an open source capabilities based OS, but this appears not to be open source.
Dr. Michael Sugrue RIP
Not to mention we can make dual use of existing land in the form of roof top solar.

The roof of every single new big box store should be covered in solar panels and we should start covering large parking lots in them too. Shaded parking that powers the area would be sweet.
Or that Apple APIs and SDKs are Apple writing at least half of everyone’s apps for them. They manufacture all the pieces, and people can arrange them differently. Playing Apple 30% is recognizing that a good chunk of the code running in any app is developed and maintained by Apple.
For dual-use tech, its relatively common to have a small "government" division alongside the much larger commercial division. If the only difference for government is fine tuning data/DoD servers - it shouldn't cost OpenAI much to support.
> A polar geosynchronous orbit, like you mentioned, would not offer much besides being over the same point on the Earth at the same instant every day.

It would offer a lot: the ability to send down an absolutely massive amount of power without having the corridor shift around so that it can be reliably routed around by air traffic. Having the equivalent of a microwave scythe moving across a large area would be kind of counterproductive.
I think this is inaccurate. Bees definitely model the world, how else would they fly around it? Further they do communicate with one another about their environments which suggests that the hive would have a greater model of the world than any singular bee.
Yes you can. I just did. And it was cheaper than the listed price on web.

It’s a relatively recent feature (past year), but it’s possible.
If you allow them to subscribe in the iOS app, then yes. Just don’t offer that option.
Frontier made an offer for Spirit.
Like in Greece.

Nominally and not actually.
The issue is that actually, outside of technical paths, businesses do like to hire business grads as it allows them to do even less training and they usually don’t care if someone is well read or opinionated (possibly prefer the opposite).
And how do you propose to move that power losslessly across your downlink? Those losses will likely be far larger than the 30% gain.

Getting rid of waste heat in space is harder than it is on earth!
Fujitsu says it will pay compensation in UK Post Office scandal
>Generative models are just a tool.

Sure. It's just a tool. That need other people's art to work.

If it's "just a tool" in and of itself, then there's no problem keeping it away from other people's art.

>The camera and 1-hour film developing didn’t destroy oil paintings

Because the copyright laws were extended to include photographic reproduction of art as something you need to obtain a permission (and a license) for.

The same needs to happen for generative AI.

A photocopy machine is just a tool too. So is the printing press.
From what I can tell, companies seem to use job postings as a form of advertising for potential customers.

Especially since this forum is frequented by techies, having a job post will get eyes on their product from their target customers as well
... except reversed?
Technitium: Secure, anonymous, P2P, open source, instant messenger
I claimed Steam was similar. I did not claim that they share all of the same policies.
I regret selling my startup
Has he admitted to talking to Putin?
Starlink performance trends have shown it is not viable alone.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink#Subscribers
Apparently you didn't read the link.
About renewables: this is a very sparse part of the state. Wind and solar power are quite well represented between Alamosa and I-25. The report says an over reliance could emerge, which is why the it tries hard to qualify nuclear.
It is true. Other stores are not your app.
The simplest explanation is that they were just as intelligent and capable as other people of their time, and figured out a way to improve their soil.
I know Texas very well, I was married there, all my kids were born there, and it's definitely the place I felt most accepted (Texas was very different then), but I gotta say it's a bit trickier than this for folks nowadays, the government there really has gotten into everyone's business and even local cities can't pass their own laws without the state government overriding them and enforcing their ideas on everyone else. It's a shadow of the state I'd come to love. So I get why people would not be anxious to sign up for that deal ( even if they don't know that Austin is in some ways less liberal and accepting than Houston or Dallas which are much more cosmopolitan and diverse).

That said, California has literally nothing like HEB and if I could have elected HEB to be the government I would have taken that deal in a heartbeat, so you and I agree there.
Nice! This would be cool to integrate with "shademap", to visualize the shade/sun during the journey.

[1] https://shademap.app/@37.75153,-119.53737,12.65679z,16416003...
This Evan You guy always could simplify things that were made complicated by frontend folks
I made this exact argument on lemmy and wondered if I was totally missing something or if the article was in fact a nothing burger.
That button does not give that game a store page, a discussion form, etc. That is not what I am talking about.
Probably the people who work there, and their families.
Muphy's law
> Basically, no real breakthrough has happened in robotics and everyone is hoping to be able to replicate LLMs/vision path for robotics (i.e. data). But no one really knows how to even collect so much high quality data and no one is even remotely close to executing it. The best we seem to have done is: https://robotics-transformer-x.github.io/

ALOHA + RT-X is a great combo to collect a lot of somewhat uniform data to enable such a breakthrough.

> Overall, just too much hype.

True. :)
Which is why a geostationary orbit would be much more feasible. Constant solar exposure with a minimal ground-track footprint that can be reliably pointed at the same ground station 24/7.

In fact, if we're already beaming power (assuming this works reliably enough) it might make sense to have a set of birds "surfing the terminator" in a polar orbits that can then transmit to geostationary birds which in turn transmit to ground stations.
Yeah thank you, that summary is better than the article.

The definition of refracitve index in the article is also just wrong, since it is simply not an angle. It can be calculated from incidence and refraction angles of the light beam - very different. See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snell%27s_law

To add to your answer, the refractive index is not just wavelength dependent, but can also be depending on the polarization of light, leading to birefringence: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birefringence
Highly doubt subpar Linux gaming experience is due to its scheduler implementation.
AWS Accounts discontinues the use of security challenge questions
You're right, I can't seem to find it either.

Tangentially, how much other research gets lost in the ether because it wasn't as interesting as this.
Just asked the latest gpt preview model to explain why human sized robots make no sense, then why they are the future. In both cases it managed to provide 10 arguments. Some of them are similar, like 'social acceptance' in negative part and 'Sociocultural Acceptance' in positive.

PS: it doesn't accept $500 tips anymore ;)
>Ah, just like humans who train against the output of other humans.

Yeah, and creating derivative work without permission is against the law.

>AI models are not fundamentally different in kind in this regard

[citation needed]

Of course they are fundamentally different. They don't get to decide what to absorb.

Humans that make those decisions, correspondingly, should pay the price.
No should, there is

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Pierre_and_Miquelon
It's free for noncommercial use. If you use it in your company, your company should pay the membership fee. afaik most openai competitors also use similar usage restriction (e.g. free for noncommercial or research use, contact us for commercial license).
Yes. There are is mnemonic phrase in german to tell where the sun is in morning/noon/evening which contains "sun is never seen in the north" - which just not work on the southern hemisphere.
Musk's warning about Tesla stake raises governance questions
The first few points you made are really great, this is often confused, but:

> Indexers (really often just a forum) often act as trackers as well, but they don't have to.

Indexers might operate a tracker (and often include their tracker by default in all their torrents/magnet links, but they're still not the same thing.

> Trackers often remove .torrent files and magnets at request, but leave enough information for you, you to create new magnet link and use their tracker for peer discovery.

No, I don't think that's true.
Sure but is that a reason to allow two competing airlines to merge? Alot of AntiTrust is trying to look at big picture that says in long run, these mergers tend to end up much worse for the consumer and generally the employees since it takes away bargain power.
Also, YouTube stopped to show ads to Russian users :-)
“Payment for all workers who develop fields or man factories would cost the companies that operate them hundreds of thousands of dollars a year in salary payments”

- slavers, probably.

Of course slavery != AI, but the argument that we should protect companies from their expenses to enable their bad business model is very entitled and presumptuous.

Thousands of companies have failed because their businesses models didn’t work, and thousands more will.

AI will be fine. It probably won’t be as stupidly lucrative as the current model, but we’ll find a way.
my answers to these questions tend to be something like: "notrandom-SDJFSDFJSDFkjfdjdsfjsdjfij324"
Streaming high resolution screen from Mac will be one of the biggest application at launch. It needs higher bandwidth and stable low latency connectivity. Bluetooth is too poor about bandwidth. That is Wi-Fi 6E is good at because it uses new clean high bandwidth frequency. It won't be a serious problem unless Wi-Fi 6 (5GHz) situation is terrible, but I think it's better to have 6E for an expensive device, especially for enterprises.
I value the healthcare I’ve received recently more than the price I’ve paid for it.

That’s not to say I’m happy with it or would like to pay those inflated rates. Or that I don’t wish it were cheaper for me and for everyone else. But when it comes down to it, the value I have placed on it is higher.

If fact, other countries may value their health more than average Americans, given relative activity levels and rates of obesity and other diseases such as type 2 diabetes, despite their cost of healthcare services being cheaper.
Inherited wealth works wonders.
How Much Money We Earned from 1.3M YouTube Views
> The argument is that any single country being overly powerful is a negative, and a more multipolar would would be healthier.

I don't find that convincing, given that the main claimants to this "multipolar world" are totalitarian dictatorships.

> Russia has spent the past year failing to conquer a country of 40 million, without any involvement from those missile silos. If they tried to invade Poland or Finland they would crumble even quicker.

This is not a view shared by any experts on the ground. Russia still maintains enough potential to cause immense damage to Poland, Finland, and all other of its neighbours, even if they ultimately lose. Rebuilding Ukraine will take many decades and countless billions, and the vast areas Russians have mined will take many centuries to clear. The mines will maim and kill tens of thousands of people - some of who haven't even been born yet - long after the war has ended.

> The only countries with a legitimate fear of a Russian invasion are the same countries who have shown zero willingness to protect other people's "freedom to speak their language and practice their culture" when it comes to Russian people living within their (present) borders.

This is complete bullshit, straight from Russian propaganda. Human rights are protected in Europe better than anywhere else in the world, and particularly well in places like Finland and Sweden that are rushing to prepare for war with Russia.

Please do tell where Russia stands in global rankings of human freedom, and where do Finland or Sweden stand.
I have trouble understanding your last sentence.

Is Breville EU/Sage appliances the high quality one, or is Breville US/AU/CA the high quality one?
LZSSE: LZ77/LZSS designed for SSE based decompression
Why can’t developers bring a class action lawsuit or someone else just open a case?

They did so in Cameron vs Apple and Google … and settled I believe !
> The concept that Kroger (for instance) has a monopoly of customers in its own store is ridiculous. There are other stores, and other bazaars.

I'm not making the argument from a legal perspective, but from a reality perspective, I think that's a very poor analogy to the way operating systems (and "platforms" generally) work.

The very nature of operating systems is that they have much more control than a simple store. For example, if you want to switch from Kroger to Safeway, just go to Safeway. There are almost zero switching costs. I actually was strongly considering switching from Android to iPhone solely to get iMessage access (that's a whole different ball of Apple anti-competitiveness, but I digress...) But in the end, even after buying the iPhone, I decided to give it away as a Christmas gift because I just couldn't stomach how painful switching would be after a decade-plus history on Android: I'd lose all my Android apps, I'd lose all the easiest access to things that live in Google's ecosystem, I'd lose my day-to-day familiarity with my phone, etc. To be clear, I'm not saying that's impossible, but it's just a much higher burden that deciding to go to a different grocery store.

Note the government has often developed special laws for "platform businesses", for example railroads, telecoms, etc., understanding the unique positions these companies are in when it comes to controlling the larger economy. I wish they would regulate operating system platforms in a similar manner.
You definitely do not have to take stupid ideas like that seriously. Simply your life.
On a side note, I find it interesting that JetBlue is considered "low cost" but has the absolute best domestic business class by a long shot.
Data point of just 1, but even in a small college town in the Midwest US, 50% or more counters at the grocery stores I've visited have been self checkout. Some places are almost entirely self checkout, to the point where if you need assistance it's hard to find an actual person employed by the store.
Gonna go out on a limb and agree with the archive.is owner -- the reason he blocks it is bc cloudflare intentionally doesn't support edns client subnet. They cite privacy reasons, but it comes at the at the cost of performance -- most cdns use DNS based routing, so using cloudflare DNS means you connect to random server for a lot of websites. CloudFlare on the other hand uses anycast routing for their CDN, so they don't suffer at all.

I hate Google but my pihole is configured to use their DNS resolvers. Lesser of two evils.
Bummer to read spirit might go under .. as a lite traveler ..stuff my clothes/belongings in a book bag ..spirit is very inexpensive and after ten or more good/fine flights in 2023 their my go to airline. None of my flights with them were any different than paying more to fly with the other more expensive airlines. My worst was a delta flight as they didn't clean the bathroom and it stink up the mid section of the plane and I paid double with delta vs. spirit.
Mostly Meta, but it's not like they don't have AI ambitions.

Apple will soon.

Media companies will eventually have it too as they roll out apps for the hardware.

I don't think it will take much data relative to overall visual training data. As a supplementary layer, a little bit goes a long way.
Not snark, but title clarification.

(When I saw "Open-source, privacy oriented, outdoor fitness tracker", I thought it would be available for an open source platform, so I clicked. It being for a closed, all-your-data-are-belong-to-us platform wasn't expected. Maybe the comment saved some clicks.)
Honestly Apple does not act as an agent for companies that are known outside of the Appstore.

Netflix has an app, Netflix “is not” an app. Google Chrome, Airbnb, Epic, anyone who has spent marketing bucks promoting their service and providing a supporting app, was rather acting as a marketing agent for Apple than the opposite.

Apple’s new stance has no merit. We all understand it’s fair to participate in the funding of the Appstore, but it is a very bad defense.
When i was in university, i remember there was this humanities professor who had a concordance for the iliad on his shelf. As a CS person it was so cool to see the ancient version of a search engine.
First they came for the artists
The voice actors
The translators
And when they finally came for the tech bros, the entire world cheered.

soon.
ML Course
People who are calling out the genocidal speech by hundreds and thousands of high-ranking "trolls" and the genocidal actions by the IDF are in the extreme minority.

As exemplified by a teacher put into solitary confinement for posting about innocent deaths in Gaza and suggesting having empathy for those.

Can you show me some, who aren't getting smeared and persecuted for it? I am not aware of a single one.
actually it's actually. abuse of law does happens (will be publicized in news), but government tries to keep tabs on it and there are NGOs providing legal aid.

admittedly, could be managed better
I’ve done software for 15 years and am fortunate to soft-retire soon. I was considering my next career to be law. I’ve filed civil actions, patents and would want to do civil litigation for consumer rights.

Any advice on how to go about getting a degree that is reasonably priced, getting experience? Is there industry knowledge around which (ideally online) school is the most legit?
> I'm really tired of people who think they can ignore all systemic economic problems by invoking value as this magical substance

As someone part of a family that has recently consumed a lot of healthcare (myself included), I am not ignoring them at all, pretending they don’t exist, or arguing that we don’t need significant reform (I think we do).
But they currently do exist and they currently are part of the cost and therefore currently dictate the value.
The Play Store takes exactly same 15%/30% commission from their developers as the App Store that everyone here is venting about. The key thing is how their payment processing discounts work.

The Play Store offers a 4% discount on the commission for alternate payment processing only in India or South Korea [1]. In comparison, Apple is doing a 3% discount, but only in the US. Perhaps this will expand further to compete for discounts between the two stores?

[1] https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answ...
It's incredible that there are actually people in this thread arguing in favor of Apple. You don't need to defend the trillion dollar company. They are not your friend, they do not care about you, your work or your life. All they do is steal 30% from society that could be used for more productive purposes than make a few people who already have everything even richer.
They do have the FastGPT api which is approx 1.5cents per api call
In the replies underneath, someone ran it on a real Acorn Electron computer (6502 at 1 MHz), where it completed in 8 hours and 40 minutes. Not too bad really.
If the legality is ambiguous then we're left with an impending court decision. Fair use is an affirmative defense, considered case by case.
You're dismissing my comment because of what someone else said upthread?

I hate the desire to meta-comment about the site rather than argue on the merits.

We obviously don't know so much about how courts will interpret copyright with LLMs. There's a lot of arguments on all sides, and we're only going to know in several years after a whole lot of case law solidifies. There are so many questions, (fair use, originality, can weights be copyrighted? when can model output be copyrighted? etc etc etc). Not to mention that the legislative branch may weigh in.

This discourse by citizens who are informed about technology is essential for technology to be regulated well, even if not all participants in the conversation are as legally informed as you'd wish. Today's well-meaning intuition about what deserves copyright and why inform tomorrow's case law and legislation.
It's a habit to take I guess. Moving the mouse around feels very weird for people who have never used it before (yes, those exist).
I never argued that AI doesn't need to worry about citing influences. If I am a person using a tool to create a work, and the final product clearly resembles some copyrighted work that I need to reference and give credit to, what does it matter if my tool is a pencil, a graphics editing program, a GPT, or my own mind? I can cite the work.
Nowhere did I tell you to be thankful. But I do find it hypocritical how oblivious and dismissive you are of the similar suffering caused by other countries, in even wider scale, over a longer time, in other parts of the world.