skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Peer reviews should be done in public and considered an ongoing process rather than a one-time thing. If an expert thinks some questions are worth asking, then the resulting discussion should be available for younger generations to learn from it as well. I think the open source ecosystem has shown the effectiveness of such a system. As more data is made public it becomes easier and more effective to sniff out bad actors as well.

We could also take steps towards helping establish high reputation for certain papers by introducing a mechanism other than citation count. Maybe some kind of stamp of approval.
Did the article really make this argument without mentioning Spirit? It's not the same as being broken up, but a lot of the work has already been outsourced.
>That's a bug in docker. If your system isn't configured for SELinux, disable it.

I feel obligated to say that you should set it to permissive mode, never disable SElinux.

sudo setenforce 0
This is an unconvincing advertisement.
Grocery Tracker
Aha!

I think you could phrase that better. Maybe something like “This projects builds on GPLv2-licensed code, so the project is GPLv2-licensed. If you want to use our additions in isolation, you can choose to use them as either GPLv2 or MIT licensed”?
Isn’t that how Spirit became a standalone company?
I wasn't aware of this, but from wikip:

"In 1973, professor Sir James Lighthill was asked by the UK Parliament to evaluate the state of AI research in the United Kingdom. His report, now called the Lighthill report, criticized the utter failure of AI to achieve its "grandiose objectives". He concluded that nothing being done in AI could not be done in other sciences. He specifically mentioned the problem of "combinatorial explosion" or "intractability", which implied that many of AI's most successful algorithms would grind to a halt on real world problems and were only suitable for solving "toy" versions.

The report was contested in a debate broadcast in the BBC "Controversy" series in 1973. The debate "The general purpose robot is a mirage" from the Royal Institution was Lighthill versus the team of Donald Michie, John McCarthy and Richard Gregory. McCarthy later wrote that "the combinatorial explosion problem has been recognized in AI from the beginning".

The report led to the complete dismantling of AI research in the UK. AI research continued in only a few universities (Edinburgh, Essex and Sussex). Research would not revive on a large scale until 1983, when Alvey (a research project of the British Government) began to fund AI again from a war chest of £350 million in response to the Japanese Fifth Generation Project (see below). Alvey had a number of UK-only requirements which did not sit well internationally, especially with US partners, and lost Phase 2 funding."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_winter

Seems this is the report if anyone is curious to read it: https://www.aiai.ed.ac.uk/events/lighthill1973/lighthill.pdf
I must admit that as someone who lives 3 hours from Airbus Hamburg where the A320s are made that my point was "IndiGo ain't idiots, and didn't buy Boeings".
> Ultimately crazies are dangerous either way.

100% true, but false equivalence can cause you to mis-prioritize a more pressing danger.

People on the right are worried about the crazies on the left canceling them for using the wrong pronoun.

People on every other part of the spectrum are worried about the far right literally ending our democracy. To be clear this is not hyperbole. Just watch a Trump rally these days—he has upped the rhetoric, even for him, to an alarming degree. And it’s met with the frothing cheers of his followers.
I think us humans are flawed enough where we need a reminder of timescale, e.g. how time tested is a theory, how long did a different belief exist before a new understanding arose?

Einstein for example had public resistance to his theory of relativity in the beginning.
I guess we're gonna see a lot of these issues over the years. Even TCP still has some novel attack vector for a DoS once a decade or so today, and it is a dinosaur conceived when the default assumption was that everyone is playing nice on the Internet.

Surprising to see that a protocol designed today still allows for such trivial resource exhaustion attacks. And thanks to the protocol living in user space, we're guaranteed that vulnerable implementations will live on for years to come in docker containers, smartphone apps, etc. (Granted in this case it seems not that bad at least for the latter since this affects servers.)
What are you talking about? Quadlet generates ordinary systemd service units with podman commands. Isn't that what you were using?

It's just a simplified layer ontop of those old systemd units.
I think the layman assumes that the authors are experts and thus so too would the peers.

Journalists are a huge problem here. I blame about half of the anti science backlash on breathless journalism writing checks science can’t cash.
The mailing list announcement might be a better link https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2024-Janua...
It's not just about software developers. All the program product management roles, as well as other similar non SWE roles are common across companies. Also as the other commenter said young people going to university will be totally not inclined to choose aerospace in US.

Whether Boeing has competition or not is not relevant if Airbus salaries give their employees a better life and help them to recruit better in the european talent market.

SpaceX does a private company version of stock options though, and Elon frequently cites this in his mails to employees on why they are not hurt by the company not being public.
I think the phrase used here quite often is "security through obscurity" when it comes to links. The question is whether people feel comfortable with family photos falling under that principle. They're obviously not meant for public consumption, but the feeling of privacy invasion if a random person stumbled on them is going to vary from person to person. If one was totally comfortable with them being public and has zero reservations about random folks peeking on them, then I'd be surprised if there weren't an even sturdier way to do this publicly (through Flickr or just an open FTP link – but that loses some of the convenience of just an iCloud album for some people).
You can generate Kubernetes yaml files with podman kube generate. Then you can use systemd to run the generated files:
https://www.redhat.com/sysadmin/kubernetes-workloads-podman-...
We live in deeply corrupt times where corporations have taken over large chunks of the mechanisms of state that are meant to regulate them. Nationalising it or asking for regulatory intervention isn't going to solve it because its one big club. This isn't just about Boeing, there are criminal corporations openly abusing customers, their staff and buying the government avoiding consequences every day. The electoral system ensures its nearly impossible to fix especially since this collective interest runs the media too. I do not see a way to fix such widespread corruption of democracy especially since its happened throughout the western world and dawned a new age of Feudalism and populism.
I think I typed something like that originally but my phone autocorrect didn't like it. Assumed Segway was the American spelling
How does Viz compare to similar rust web frameworks like Axum?
No, I have a paid account to remove ads but the base functionality doesn't require it.
It's completely different because the artist explicitly sold or otherwise granted the rights to their creation(s).
I actually wanted to buy a Google One plan, but when I read their terms of service[1], it said that my data still is subjected to their privacy policy[2]. Which means Google can still sell my data to advertisers, even if I were to pay for the service.

1. https://one.google.com/terms-of-service
2. https://policies.google.com/privacy#whycollect
Cool webgame... whats the premise tl;didnt-go-to-discord?
How does the sensor work for capturing light for that long? Wouldn't it produce a solid white image after a single day? Is there any difference between taking a 1000 year exposure and taking a photo every day for 1000 years and laying them ontop of eachother?
I see, so you won’t
> Plus, unlike Docker their containers bow to SELinux definitions

Isn't that great? You want SELinux if you deploy containers on prod.

> I have repeatedly struggled with containers unable to access mapped directories.

Use the `z` or `Z` flag, e.g. `podman run -v mydir:podman_dir:z nginx` to get SELinux labels updated automatically (and temporarily) by podman.
This. The more history you read the more it becomes clear that basically everyone was a Nazi before the 20th century. Even Marx and Lenin were white supremacists and FDR, Woodrow Wilson and other liberals were too or at least appeased Nazis. LBJ was probably the first anti-Nazi president
Also flat, as in there’s no “happy times” before that gets ruined, it’s pure dred the whole movie so it feels like there’s no climax to build to.
As a certified RHEL engineer I have been using Podman for years already.

To be perfectly honest I do enjoy it for all my personal container use. But at work I still use docker for our developers. There is so far nothing I can offer our developers that can match docker compose in simplicity.

We even use buildah in CI pipelines when we make container images, but specifically for developer end users docker compose is still dominant.
The U.S. law in question applies to people under 70:

https://uscode.house.gov/statviewer.htm?volume=92&page=189

There’s actually a fascinating bit of history behind this which I learned about on a recent podcast:

https://www.si.edu/sidedoor/wrinkled-radicals
You are almost right :) I'm 23.
Thank you for your feedback. I appreciate it.
I agree with you. Prioritizing one single thing to get really good at has a lot of impact, but from what I think right now, I believe I will be happy prioritizing a couple of things and not doing too much or too little.
Import myModule from "./my-module.torrent": requiring Node modules from BitTorr
good point. how about allowing unlimited endorsements but only show 5 that you may choose? (and by default the newest endorsements should be shown so that older endorsements naturally disappear over time unless specifically selected to show)
You can have a lot of output once you stop receiving input for a few days.
You can’t define a generic interface in terms of another generic interface in Fortran. To do what you suggest in actual Fortran, you would have to write specific functions for all the combinations of data types and ranks supported by MATMUL (hundreds).
Indeed, see the ones in Freeport, Maine or New Hyde Park, New York:

https://www.architecturaldigest.com/gallery/beautiful-mcdona...
Some Americans are waking up to an awareness that many other Americans have had all along.
There have been plenty of non-German beer brewers who hide behind the so-called "beer purity laws" to claim some cachet for themselves. In America they tout themselves as adhering to these laws, which is sort of nonsensical if you think about it, because how could they be prosecuted or sued for breaking them? They are not in Germany; perhaps the brewing occurs in Germany and the product is exported from there? I don't know. Anyway, it's just one of those examples of corporate hypocrisy that the FDA/USDA doesn't really require them to label any ingredients at all, and they could put anything in there -- not saying that they do, of course, but we have no actual guarantees that they don't.
What I would have liked to know before I started running
So in summary, Boeings break down like MacDonnells[1], but it’s not Boeing’s fault, it’s the fault of the entire ecosystem, but not Boeing, just everyone involved with Boeing, we get it. Entire denial of ownership of problems should be patented as a business model. So that no other manufacturer can copy it for 20 years.

[1] McDonnell planes were known for falling apart, doors flying in the air, lengthened planes which didn’t adapt the airframe for the new length, or just pieces falling off. Remember the Concorde getting pierced in the fuel tanks by a metal frame dropped on the airstrip by the previous plane and crashing into a hotel? Yup, it was a piece that fell off a McDonnell.
in general one doesn't want to materialize the intermediates. one evaluation strategy is treat the sets as streams. this removes the for loops, and leaves the evaluation strategy intact. for more complicated expressions, also allows you to move the filters first (referential transparency for the win), just like you would if you were compiling a relational query.
> I am working on something, but that something is myself.

I'd say you're working on the right things. Our fellow humans would like to hide behind the idea that any of this matters, but at the end of the day, it doesn't. What does matter to you is yourself and the relationships of people close to you.
Following this episode, I did find an AVX2 implementation of the maximum subarray sum that's about 25% faster than the sequential version, published here: https://gist.github.com/mlochbaum/b6e9701c6c1c617a2c2a4fb107...

Troels Henriksen (Futhark developer) pointed out to me that in expanding the state to make the scan associative I'd reinvented a fairly well-known method. The transformation from a specification as "maximum over the sums of each subarray" to the associative scan is very often used as an example of the power of the Bird-Meertens formalism or Squiggol[0], and some newer papers have demonstrated that it can be derived automatically, although not very quickly. Troels also wrote a simpler ISPC[1] implementation[2] that tested slower than C on an older CPU and faster on a newer one. Then I translated that to BQN and found it was about 4x slower than sequential C.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird%E2%80%93Meertens_formalis...

[1] https://ispc.github.io/index.html

[2] https://gist.github.com/athas/f016084ea749602476b96c05ae415a...
I love your sentiment. I've been fighting off the intrusive "when people ask me" thoughts to eliminate the absurd hypothetical shame/embarrassment. I think it's improved my life.
Interesting, they must scale up with age. I had to deal with that recently and it was cheaper than trying to rush a late development project for a replacement.
Fair enough, that might be recent usage among teenager. But if we're discussing how nicotine pouches (and lozenges, etc.) are replacing smoking/dip/snus, it seems super important to distinguish between the ones with tobacco and the ones that aren't.
Yep.

Another example is the stranger kidnapping scare of the ‘80s.

There’s an unhealthy paradox at work: The rarer a highly emotional event occurs, the more media attention attention it gets. The more media attention something gets, the more people think it’s actually common.

Another example is police killing unarmed black men.

Trying explaining to someone that something is in the news because it’s rare is futile.
> every metric

Sure, except:

- First spacecraft to detect/study the Van Allen belt
- First solar-powered satellite
- First polar-orbit satellite
- First photograph of Earth from orbit
- First satellite recovered from orbit
- First spy photos from space
- First aerial recovery of an object returning from orbit
- First great ape in space
- First pilot-controlled space flight
- First successful planetary flyby (Venus)
- First spaceplane
- First reusable piloted spacecraft
- First geosynchronous satellite
- First geostationary satellite
- First piloted spacecraft orbit change
- First successful Mars flyby mission
- First rendezvous of manned spacecraft
- First spacecraft docking
- First direct-ascent (first orbit) rendezvous
- First (and only) human orbit of the Moon
- First (and only) humans to land on the Moon
- First spacecraft to orbit another planet (Mars)
- First spacecraft sent on solar escape trajectory
- First spacecraft to enter the asteroid belt
- First Jupiter flyby
- First Mercury flyby
- First Saturn flyby
- First untethered spacewalk
- First Uranus flyby
- First Neptune flyby
- First Pluto flyby

So, yeah, vanity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_Space_Race
https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/o51254593.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_artificial_satellites_and_space_probes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explorer_1
I'm working on nothing. It is ok to give up the external validation of doing something, and I've found live much more livable.

"Evil comes from a man's inability to sit quietly in his own chair."
Won't see me supporting it.
Ads that quote the prices and the dollar menu give the perception of uniform pricing. I guess ads are regional, only mention one or two products, and they mention "in participating stores". I wonder how much the dollar menu varies (if that's even a thing any more, it's been many years...)
Indeed.

Though it was a bit of a shock in an/the Arabic sky culture to find one of their constellations called "Woman chained to a post"!
Boeing would probably work better with a keiretsu style structure anyway.
Employees Say 'Sizable Portion' of Gearbox-Owned Studio Has Been Laid Off
Do you have codecanyon plugins in your index?
Read more history.
Afaik it hasn’t reached OpenWrt stable yet
I agree, and I'm not sure how to fix this. You could peel away the defense part of Boeing, but that doesn't solve the issues the commercial side is having. Nationalizing has a sketchy track record in general, and the US isn't experienced in it, so I don't see that going well. It's really that the company has the wrong leadership and the wrong culture, and you can't just fix that.
Joel Spolsky wrote years ago that nothing generated new sales of his software more than releasing a new version with more features.

That's hard for a business to turn down.
The space side of the business is a huge mess—Starliner was supposed to go into operation around the same time as Crew Dragon but got delayed by multiple issues.

Also, Boeing’s status as a major military contractor is slipping. They have lost multiple contract bids in recent decades. As a consequence of losing the JSF competition they have also put a lot of lobbying and PR effort into attacking the F-35 in an attempt to drum up more business for the Super Hornet; this didn’t work out and Super Hornet production is set to end next year.
it helps to just practice. at first you'll be overwhelmed by just operating the car. then you will start to have some spare attention span for other drivers. then over time that awareness circle will widen.

understand that other people are only paying 1/4 or 1/2 their attention to what's going on around them. you need to make up for it. that means giving the car in front of you a bunch of room (more time to react for you) and other defensive driving, etc.

(i learned to drive at like 36. then started doing track days. got my racing license. now i do club and vintage racing. i still find highway driving a bit stressful, as other drivers do the strangest stuff)
If you can find a meaningful and clear line suitable for use in regulations I'm sure there's some people who would like to hear it.
Obligatory xkcd, of course: https://xkcd.com/949/
I have a six month old and have dealt with two people dying in the past three years including handling their estates. I’m lucky I have time to learn anything at work.
Sadly, in the end they lost money on it. They came to a point where producing the plane was profitable, but they never recouped the development cost: https://simpleflying.com/was-the-a380-programme-profitable/
Mafia, the party game, models information asymmetry
Not many. Gas giants can form on their own, they have composition similar to interstellar material (mostly hydrogen and helium).

Rocky planets can only form in proto disks around newly forming stars. Heavier materials (carbon and up) are concentrated this way.
Rocks and dirt are aggregates of chemicals, and different kinds of rocks and dirt are made up of different chemicals.

Mining waste includes the chemicals from the ground, and chemicals used in the mining process (and chemicals produced in the interaction between the two.) Obviously, with significantly less of whatever was being mined, since the whole goal is to extract that from the first by use of the second.
I disagree. Users, not just maintainers, discover projects through GitHub. In this context, the README effectively serves as a secondary project landing page. IMO, for a visual project like this, images, or a direct link to images, is a must.
I think it's funny how HNews is filled with this type of content. While there are also many posts about people not working at all remotely or working multiple jobs. I think we all have friends who work multiple roles or do nothing remotely.

So it's not exactly surprising that companies are stopping with remote work, or at least are becoming careful with remote work.
Yeah, it seems purpose built as an untestable thought project. Might as well have had some kids put hand prints in concrete at the base.

Imagine what the time value of the money spent on this will be for this in 1000 years. A market investment of $1000 that could return 2% over inflation over that time period would be equivalent to $400B in today's dollars.
I like both Dunes for different reasons.

I do think there’s a major challenge in adapting Dune, which is that Paul’s arc is just starting at the end. The narrative tension doesn’t let up until three books later. If you’ve only got one movie guaranteed, morphing it into a more-traditional hero’s journey isn’t the worst way to solve that rather large problem.

I’m curious how Villeneuve’s going to deal with that.
I am working on relocating to an area that will afford me more personal and professional opportunities in the future. I have been writing software professionally for over 20 years and there is not much left there to captivate me, so I’ve refocused my professional efforts towards softer skills. I spend a lot of my day talking to people, organizing schedules, planning, networking, writing proposals. Much like you, working on myself.