skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Devils advocate here, if you limit the speed for your teen and then need to accelerate to get out of a dangerous situation, what will happen?

I’m not saying it happens often, but I’ve had times when driving on the motorway when I simply need to accelerate past the normal legal limit to get some distance or swap lanes safely to get away from some one behind me or next to me.
Are there really significant use-cases which require both a higher performance processor and GPIO pins? I imagine at this point there is value in splitting the product line to tailor towards "mini Arm server", and "IoT/robotics" users separately.
Its really not that hard to teach even barely competent devs to get all the right requirements for working on stuff. I don't understand how people have this many issues with it. If its that big of a deal, just write a basic shell script to set up the environment for them. Or better yet, just do a better job hiring.
>diagnose bugs

Literally says in the article that GPT's main drawback is that it can't debug in the same way a human can.
Of the few I attempted this year I actually used ChatGPT to help me decipher just what the hell the waffling, rambling, windy, unclear, and ultimately superfluous challenge requirements were.

I didn’t have the solutions generated by ChatGPT to be clear, I used a prompt along the lines of “take this text and extract it’s requirements and generate bullet points, also make the example inputs and outputs clear”.

I did the same for the previous year too, when ChatGPT hadn’t been out for long.

I find that a lot more enjoyable and less tedious.
They want to call the product fdx but don't seem to have secured the domain for it. Weird.
There is significant cost in storage though, so there will still be peaks and valleys.
Running with iPhone/Mac charger.. the desktop shows notification about “Power supply not supporting 5A” and runs Ok until I try to play a video on YouTube, then it simply reboots.

And yes it’s nearly impossible to find 5v5a power supply in India.
How can Cloudflare be reading anything you send? Your connection is encrypted to HN's server, is it not? They don't MITM everyone's connection.
We should legislate so car manufactures have to stop cars going past a certain speed. Like we do with limiting van speeds.

Excess speed causes a very large proportion of car crashes and traffic jams and injuries.
> The problem is that there are people who will classify any unsolicited mail from any business they've dealt with as spam.

I'd agree if this was the edge-case, but the truth is that most businesses tend to lean towards sending more email than they need to, so overzealous use of the spam button is an expected reaction in response.

> which for online email services is likely to affect future processing of mail from related sources for themselves and potentially for others as well.

That's the system working as designed - if in aggregate most people signal that they don't want to receive a certain piece of mail or all mail from a certain sender, chances are I will agree with their decision.

> But there are plenty of recipients abusing the senders of legitimate messages too.

I'll be happy to change my mind once email becomes strictly opt-in and senders would err on the side of caution and the default is no email at all and you must explicitly opt into every distinct category of email, with the opt-in being located in the same annoying and hard-to-reach places as the opt-outs currently are.

That's not (yet?) the case, suggesting the spam button isn't being pressed enough. You're trying to guilt people about liberal use of the mark-as-spam button but you seem to have no issues with senders liberally using the "send spam" button.
> using the white conductor for anything other than neutral.

Where the NEC applies, you can use the white conductor in a multiconductor cable for anything as long as it is "permanently reidentified", that is color coded where it is exposed. cf NEC 200.7.
ByteNode: A minimalist bytecode compiler for Node.js
I think this bit from the FAQ is the info everyone on here is looking for

> Internally, the EXT platform is split into two parts. The first part is the frontend, which is built using Electron; the second is the control application, which is shipped as a separate executable file. When the frontend is launched, it runs the control application as a child process.

So basically EXT is an electron app which wraps around small web apps offered through ext.store
What makes you think you're right about any of that? Do you have any evidence to back up your (crazy) theory that an entire field of study isn't real science?

Cause from where I'm sitting, nutritional scientists do plenty of real science - studying a very complex problem that poses a lot of challenges to experiments, and still coming up with a lot of great results that teach us tons about nutrition.

Most people that criticize the field do so because they read a bunch of articles. Or because they're in the world of hard sciences, and are simply arrogant enough to think they know better than everyone else, even in fields they've never studied.
>Has there been any good application of "periodic table" as a visualization method for anything other than chemical elements?

No, because as can be seen in all of them the structure of the table maps to the structure of the chemical elements.

The visualization of chemical elements is successful because it is an accurate representation of how chemical elements work, it does not just represent data but also is mapped to a model of how that data can conceivably change in the future.

Every periodic table of X that is not chemical elements is stupid and does not work because

1. come on - what are the odds that some other subject in the universe has a similar model to chemical elements.

2. the visualization is not done to best represent the data but the data is bent as best as it can be to fit into the periodic table structure.

And what is meant by periodic structure here - it is meant a selection of cells laid out in a very specific way with a color scheme so that if you saw it far enough away you would instantly think - hey, it's a periodic table!

The periodic table used this way is not a data visualization method, it is a visualization parody
method.

on edit: also pisses me off because in my world a parody should at least be funny, darn it.
sorry for the rant, this stuff really pisses me off.
Is it? It doesn't seem to me that Intel can compete on performance per watt, which is what really matters in a handheld. From what I can tell, the APU alone can get to 45W in the claw, while that's the max power draw for the entire steam deck (LCD). Add to that the fact that MSI is not selling games to recoup the very aggressive price point of the steam deck and you just get a worse machine for more money
we are humans, we need something to worship
There are protocols for Interplanetary Internets - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interplanetary_Internet

The way we interact with the Internet would have to change though due the extra delays involved in communication between planets.

A lunar base would have a delay of about 2.5 seconds, so could probably just connect direct to the Internet on Earth via a few gateways located on the Earth (possible just a simple SOCKS proxies with a high value on the TCP Timeouts on it's lunar side). It would be slow, so you'd want to include quite a bit of caching for data on both sides that doesn't change.

Once you start talking about other planets though your delays would start to become unusable for interactive operations (between 5 and 20 minutes for Mars), so at that point you'd have to start thinking about using more asynchronous methods of communication (e.g. send an email rather than use a chat session).

I have to admit that part of me loves the idea of using a variation of FidoNet for interplanetary communication :)
Well IMF just keep tabs on the AI billionaire/millionaire underling production rate every quarter. If it's going up then AI is definitely doing something dumb and unnecessary. To fix track them down and ship them off to China's jack ma center of reeducation. And humanity will be just fine.
Well that made the cynical view above look a little more appealing.
I've been in Japan 5 years now and my enthusiasm for trains has really taken off since I got here.

I just showed my one year old this song and he's loving it.

I really enjoyed the Hara model railway museum in Yokohama as it's not just nice model railways but also the biography of Nobutaro Haras life and his travels around the world documenting trains.
Sorry, I'm not steeped in that world (unlike some of the more presumptuous and clearly self-serving comments surrounding yours have evidently assumed), and I don't know of any; my background is a programmer with a formal education in CS. I wouldn't be surprised if the answer were, "There aren't any." cf Feynman:

In this age of specialization men who thoroughly know one field are often incompetent to discuss another. The great problems of the relations between one and another aspect of human activity have for this reason been discussed less and less in public.
It's a huge problem if the rental market is underbuilt. It's not nearly as much a problem (perhaps not a problem at all) if the rental market is overbuilt. From what I hear from friends in Austria, it's not a problem.
Can’t come soon enough. I’m counting down the days…
I use it with a LTE addon board to process/generate phone call audio locally.
Show HN: How far back in time do you have start working to match Musk's wealth?
I'm sure you know this (since in my experience the history of the name is usually taught together with the technique), but for those reading along: the name "dynamic programming" originates from the late forties, early fifties. While the "office politics"-related motivation Richard Bellman gives for the name cannot be completely true due to anachronisms[0], it still fits with terms that made sense at the time, before the modern usage of "programming" existed:

> The word dynamic was chosen by Bellman to capture the time-varying aspect of the problems (...). The word programming referred to the use of the method to find an optimal program, in the sense of a military schedule for training or logistics. This usage is the same as that in the phrases linear programming and mathematical programming, a synonym for mathematical optimization.

I fully agree that would be nice if we relegated "dynamic programming" to a confusing historical umbrella term, and switched to less confusing names, like the ones you suggested. In that sense it is similar to "trie" - it's a funny pun, but incredibly impractical for verbal communication especially. It would be so much better if we all decided to just use "prefix tree" or "prefix search tree" and avoid the ambiguity.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_programming#History
I agree, except for the OpenAI part. These subscriptions are currently much cheaper than labor - about 100x even for poorly paid jobs - and so there is simply not that much value to capture in terms of total size of the economy. In other words, if the employee costs $2000 and OpenAI charges $20, then $1980 are captured by the company using the tech, not OpenAI. So there would be a problem of course, but it‘s not like the value would necessarily go just to the tech industry. Instead it might go increasingly to those who own „the means of production“ to use a Marxist term for analysis purposes.

And if the prices they charge go up, it should be possible to compete with open products.
Germany's long distance trains are comfortable but the reliability of the Deutsche Bahn is abysmal. In 2023, more than one third of their long distance train were delayed, a metric that has been going down for quite a while. My own experience is much worse, with three out of five long distance trips canceled without notice and a fourth one replaced by a voucher for a 450km taxi ride.

In a country the size of Germany clamoring to have an environmentally oriented politic, train should be a convenient alternative to both car and airplane but unfortunately the train network is a joke.
Inflammation can also inhibit finding the cause of an issue, so saying you shouldn't treat it is probably a poor blanket statement to make.
I too remember 2017 and headlines about millions upon millions of people being replaced by robots around 2025. I even saw videos of little bots peforming the job of baristas, trucks self driving, and all sorts of other crazy things. Not that they are not doable but you know, they are difficult to implement by people that have no clue how things work, let alone how humans interact.
It's a sad world when a thoughtful, well-structured, obviously experience-based and informative comment is immediately assumed to be word guessing machine generated garbage.
Git is not merely a social construct, it is a veritable smorgasbord of of patriarchal, colonial, and capitalist structures. Branches are instruments of colonial exploration and exploitation, which facilitate the integration new code territories into repository empires. Merges symbolize the enforcement of a hierarchical order, patriarchally assimilating code into dominant “master” norms. Commits, as quantifiable units of productivity, enable the capitalist class to separate the worker from the means of production.

(…and don’t get me started on stashes. Private property is inherently theft.)

The only way to upend the oppression of Git is through Subversion!
It's no big reveal that I was involved and optimistic about Nim for a long time, though "BDFL-in-2nd-command" is a stretch for someone who couldn't even get the community to instate a Code of Conduct. That's one of the many many reasons I left.

My many years of involvement with Nim is what I believe qualifies me to speak on the individuals in the forked project. That being said, I am no longer involved with Nim. I don't want to get reinvolved. I just want to warn people about individuals who were abusive to me (and others) for many years.

I banned very few people during my time in the Nim community, and never without good reason. I don't know who you could be referring to here. I'm sure you left this comment with the best of intentions, but you say it yourself, you were less active back then and have had minimal interactions with me on the subject.
How can there be profits without wage income to buy the output?

The paradox of productivity will kick in and prices will plummet.
Wow signed up to HN just to share your experience? Not suspicious at all…
SEEKING WORK | Malaysia (GMT+8) or India (GMT+5.30) | Remote

- Technical Writer: A Technical Writer with 5+ years of experience in creating clear, concise, and user-friendly documentation.

Technologies: XML, Wiki Markup; Adobe Tools [FrameMaker, Illustrator, Photoshop CS4];
Video Editing [CapCut, Clipchamp, Canva];
Microsoft Tools [Word, Powerpoint, Excel, Visio, Paint];
Soft Skills [Problem Solving, Adaptability, Team Player, Superior Time Management]

Résumé/CV: https://www.linkedin.com/in/seemavbhat

--

- Voiceover Work:

Recently started my Youtube channel "www.youtube.com/@BeyondBordersBliss" and I am enthusiastic about extending my passion for Voiceover work to professional projects. Whether it's narrating a story, voicing characters, or delivering informative content, I am dedicated to bringing a unique and appealing vocal quality to the table. My linguistic versatility allows me to cater to a diverse audience, and I am confident in delivering high-quality voiceovers in English, Hindi and Kannada languages.

Contact/Email: mail2seemabhat@gmail.com
>Turns what you're paying for with expensive cables is better shielding around the copper.

There's a threshold where any shielding improvement is inaudible, and that threshold is far below what most people would consider "expensive cables".
Realistic view: Unemployment is actually at an all time low despite centuries of industrialization, automation, etc.

AI technology is becoming a commodity at a rapid rate. OpenAI has some nice data moat but their tech is being copied left right and center and much of what they do has been replicated successfully by others; including some open source projects. I don't see OpenAI end up with all the profit here.

AI is a transformative technology for sure. But just like previous introductions of transformative technology it won't play out as doom predictors predict.

Most of the goods we buy and consume are actually produced in parts of the world where workers are exploited just fine without the help of AI. The dystopia already exists; just not in our little bubble. And a lot of those places have leveled up quite a bit economically in recent decades. So things aren't that bad anymore.

Our own past is actually built on the dystopia of the industrial revolution where people had no rights and worked until they dropped dead. Most of us on this forum have jobs that most of those people would not have considered real work. Hence us procrastinating on hacker news instead of doing real work.

AI will cause more of that to happen everywhere. But we'll find ways to keep ourselves busy. And more free time means that we can do things that are valuable to us. And what are economies other than just the accumulation of things we value? It used to be that we mostly valued not starving to death. Most of our economies were basically related to food production. Now food production is only a tiny part of our economies. We found more valuable things to do. Whatever AIs do or don't do, we'll find a way to find new things that are valuable to us. AIs simply expand our economy to include more such things. That's what transformative technology does. It grows our economies.
Oh boy. I'll take "Motivated Reasoning" for 50¢, Ken.
The 4090 is also upwards of $2k. This is more that what i spent on my entire computer that's a few years old and is still very powerful. We used to rag on people buying titans for gaming, but since Nvidia did the whole marketing switcheroo now titans are just *090 cards and they appear as reasonable cards.

My point is that Nvidia has the absolute highest end, but it's ridiculous to suggest that anyone with a budget less than the GDP of Botswana should consider the 4090 as an option at all. For actually reasonable offers, AMD delivers the most performance per dollar most of the time.
It makes a lot of sense in embedded devices, where the GPLv3 license cannot be used for commercial devices which are using signed images (secure-boot / verified-boot) for security reasons. I expect a lot of adoption there.
> one notable exception being electric cars

"Electric cars" are a patently ridiculous concept. I guarantee you in the future we're using personal electric vehicles (scooters and variations thereof), not "electric cars".
Every website tests different settings. There's a certain standard for brightness, the websites browsed, the software used, and so on. You can't compare battery tests unless all the test parameters are the same.

For instance, Tweakers uses a screen brightness of 180 cd/m² while testing, whereas NotebookCheck uses 150 cd/m². That alone should account for a sizeable difference in test results. I find it hard to tell what 30 cd/m² means in practice.
How similar are the goals of LiveView and HTMX?
How governments become addicted to suppliers like Fujitsu
This makes me wonder whether on-device AI will ever have a real chance against cloud based AI except for extremely latency sensitive tasks.

If the technology advances at such a pace that almost everyone is sitting on obsolete or far too weak hardware then the economics of on-device AI processing may not work out for app developers.

If it's just a matter of running a little bit slower or a little bit faster then it won't be a problem. But if people miss out on important capabilities altogether unless they spend thousands on hardware at least every other year then AI will be almost exclusively a cloud thing.
Seeing systemd invoked in a Dockerfile looks so wrong.
Between AI and robots, we're looking at the privatization of the very concept of automation. Bodes ill.
Programmers seem to have little (or only moderate) problem with pointers and references in programming languages. With the occasional bug here or there with things like using `==` on `Integer` (Java). But bugs aside: they get what it is about. But when this is used in Git it becomes a sort of philosophical conundrum? Like huh, what is the ontology of a branch vs. the phenomenological nature of it. I don’t get it.
Careful, your homedir has a CloudStorage folder and if you are using, say, Dropbox or Google Drive then that find will be incredibly slow (in addition to security software possibly slowing it down).
can you link to it? I'm interested in reading it.
Just because you dislike it doesn’t mean it’s not a useful framework. And yes, it does come up in first year econ classes, as well as in advanced courses that study the history of economic thought. If you bothered to read the linked page or do your own research on “economic profit” you would realize that the “normal profit” you’re thinking of is a distinct subject.

Edit: also keep in mind that literally all of economics up until relatively recently relied on broad assumptions like the rational consumer. Kepler thought the sun was the center of the universe, does that invalidate his laws of planetary movement?
Why is the "noble" (rightmost) column filled with garbage visualization methods? Seems like very very little thought went into the "period table" aspect of this
Stay with the dogma.
> What things are vs what things are used for is not interesting by category

On the contrary, this is the entire field of UX design, and quite a large chunk of material anthropology.

At some level everything we relate to is a social construct, once we use it to discuss things with other humans. A computational linguist friend of mine once wrote a long LJ post on "Ether is a social construct" after spending his PhD extracting chemical information from papers. His point was that ether, like various acids and other substances, behaves differently at different concentrations, in ways that are important for reactions but must be inferred from context and prior knowledge of chemistry. In other words, technical terms are more precise than everyday language, but are rarely fully precise because they cannot capture all the context in which they are used.
then you will simply see those jobs being moved/outsourced to the third world without regulations, just like virtually all manufacturing did.
china, russia, india and a ton of other countries won't give a shit about 'global moratorium on AI research' and 'assault GPU ban'. US+EU are a fraction of the world's population.
The 3 major disadvantages severely limits its use: expensive to run, almost no steering or breaks, and it can't climb slopes.
Key European Union achievements and tangible benefits