skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Right, so, the question is: to who?

It looks bad if she cares about height if you just flat up ask her, alone, without peers.

It does not look as bad if she admits to it with and to her peers. You get to see mate pre-selection in action! There's a lot of chiming in. This is where the performative disdain appears. Disdain, because you will see expressions and utterances of distaste or even disgust; performative, because she is communicating this preference with her peers, partially for validation. You can catch women and even girls doing this. There's a hint of social jockeying in there. After all, by rejecting (or even pre-rejecting) someone, you're ranking them lower than you in some fashion. And there's really only two ways to increase your relative status: bring yourself up or tear someone else is down. Which is easier?

It also doesn't look that bad if the height question is mixed in with tons of other questions, and she isn't looking anyone in the eye when answering. This is the private milieu. Here, it's a questionnaire. She's at least taking a swing at being honest with her preferences.

Well, it's been a few decades, so my memory is limited. "Attractiveness" was a general self-reported category and women rated themselves higher. Interestingly, attractiveness and height overruled religion for women, even those who reported the religion answer as being at the highest rating on the scale.

We did have some psych tests besides the "barely above astrology" MBTI, namely the Taylor-Johnson.

I don't think you're going to see a lot of hardcore studies. Even OKCupid redacted their conclusions. It's really one of those areas where average people aren't ready to hear the results. The results would be unpleasant for the tabula rasa crowd and their buddies, the people who are against gender essentialism. And if it might present women in a less than brilliant light, consider the "Women Are Wonderful" effect.
I'm one of those that cited it as literally one of two apps that I will never switch to iOS over. I sincerely hope the community picks it up and continues it. It's easily one of the best apps I've ever used.
Thank you! But the reason I used that feature was because it was Mozilla official code and not some third-party add-on that might get sold behind my back three months later.
Gemini ultra is nowhere close to GPT-4 for anything I tried.
By that logic if there is a landslide happening at the coast, then we should marshal all available resources to stop it?
The joys of reviewing a GTM change submitted by some Chad at "Marketers R Us" where they copied a minimized, practically obfuscated, JavaScript blob of unknown origin into the browser.

LGTM!

FML...

Also GTM can get fucked.
How would you know how frequently others do that?

I think people with an inner voice don't notice their 'random' memories as much because they don't fit the narrative. Like confirmation bias, the bits that don't fit get filtered out, yet visual narratives are more flexible than that.

When you dream, it's like a montage, right? Do you hear sound at all? The dream still makes sense when you're in it though. How is waking reality any different in that regard?
Taking the statement at face value (and in my experience), the normal driving case is problem enough. Signs should do everything they can to provide a tidbit of information and then fade, or else they're taking you away from the focus you should have on driving.

That's why signs always look the same, use a standard font, and are extremely large. I assume the article is talking about interstate highways, and banning this dangerous childishness there seems like a great use of federal attention. Especially if this action detracts from building more highways.
>7. Likewise when you realize how array-based languages handle any dimension array.

Deserves to be ranked higher, especially for the "blub" programmer. With specific examples. I not-so-recently saw an implentation of euler's method that replaced the ODE solvers of MATLAB for pegagogical reasons. I return to it when I want to think about generalizing in that way.
> And an increasing number of features inevitably begin to bog down what a company can do going forward

This is a common misconception.

It may happen to be true, but it does not have to be true.

What prevents rapid delivery is constraints, and naive, stupid or incompetent implementation (or requirements) for features that add more constraints.

Adding features in a way that aligns with existing constraints, or breaks existing constraints doesn’t have to be slow; just careful.

What kills software is “nothing can ever change once it’s in production”; ie. once a feature is live, it becomes a hard constraint that can never be altered or removed or changed because of user expectations.

It’s not the number of features; it’s the immobility and panic caused by the prospect of anything ever changing, which prevents you changing anything, except very very slowly.
That requires a gravity based mechanism to return it back down though.
You're not kidding, it's unusably laggy and crashed my Firefox tab twice.
It's radio certification requirement for phones to be able to do so in some regions, and requirement to NOT be able in some others so it can't be used for pranks and terrorist manifest deliveries.
> why not simply assume I'm mis-informed but in good faith, and correct me ?

In the absence of information I would've done just that, but I had a look at your comment history first before I replied. lol

Happy to have been helpful. Cheers mate
There's a whole Internet to post important results on without waiting for peer review. If you're an established practitioner in your field making claims that are straightforward to follow, other practitioners will probably read you.
>The first time some people will see or touch a book is when they get to elementary school. Those people are set up to fail in life, and anybody growing up from birth in an environment with no books is disadvantaged.

That is the concern of the parents, there is nothing preventing anyone from reading if they are so inclined today.

>We all exist within history, it’s not some bubble where what happened before your birth isn’t relevant.

Discrimination is not solved by discriminating harder.

Blaming the peoples of today for sins committed by the peoples of yesterday only breed resentment.

Judging the peoples of yesterday by the social, cultural, and judicial norms of today distorts and corrupts history, only breeding ignorance in the peoples of today.
That's the thing about Assembly, you rewrite the program.
Show HN: Reparenting DOM elements: stealing a video from under the nose of React
So this means we can correct for this at the fetal stage now? Or possibly with CRISPR based gene replacement since it just one SNP.
yeah, and maybe someone was depending on that historical situation without realizing it
thank you for building an amazing product!

I suspect cloning OpenAI's API is done for compatibility reasons. most AI-based software already support the GPT-4 API, and OpenAI's official client allows you to override the base URL very easily. a local LLM API is unlikely to be anywhere near as popular, greatly limiting the use cases of such a setup.

a great example is what I did, which would be much more difficult without the ability to run a replica of OpenAI's API.

I will have to admit, I don't know much about LLM internals (and certainly do not understand the math behind transformers) and probably couldn't say much about your second point.

I really wish HomeAssistant allowed streaming the response to Piper instead of having to have the whole response ready at once. I think this would make LLM integration much more performant, especially on consumer-grade hardware like mine. right now, after I finish talking to Whisper, it takes about 8 seconds before I start hearing GlaDOS and the majority of the time is spent waiting for the language model to respond.

I tried to implement it myself and simply create a pull request, but I realized I am not very familiar with the HomeAssistant codebase and didn't know where to start such an implementation. I'll probably take a better look when I have more time on my hands.
It was always subpar, not because of anything Tachiyomi did but because of the inherent unreliability of pirate manga sites and their low resolution downscales. Maybe this incident will encourage some of you to self-host your own manga streaming website (for personal use).
Agreed. When I had a satphone I can't remember even once using it for voice, only for texts.
You are correct. It's a fortunate coincidence and nothing more.

It's much easier to think of the gradual warping of spacetime around a black hole so that more and more directions are down. East? No, that's really east and down. Left? Nope, you thought you were going left but it is left and down. Less and less "up" is available to you until you are on a knife edge where you can make an orbit (assuming a non-rotating black hole, no angular momentum) around the event horizon with a photon. Beyond that, everything is some flavor of down.
Someone here recently linked Connections episodes available on the Internet Archive and it's been great to watch episodes.

https://archive.org/details/bbc-connections-1978
This outage forced me to use Google for the first time in a while and boy did I forget how much I hated it.
I recommend looking up Juan Brown's blancolirio channel on Youtube and watching his videos about the incident and the plug door.
In a lot of fields, more eyes aren't going to create fewer walls, because (a) the important venues are selecting K winners out of N submissions, and that K is the bottleneck, and (b) in most fields, any real (and some unreal) results will get published somewhere.
This is the country that wiped Albania's government networks TWICE because they host some former political figures.

It's also the country that cut out power and send the army to kill people in their homes at night during the recent Masha Amini protests.

This is also the country sponsoring Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthi rebels.

Is it actually that hard for you to believe they're doing this?

IS IT?!?!?!?
When you think about the damage that could be done with this kind of technology it’s incredible.

Imagine asking your MixAIr to sort out some fresh dough in a bole and then leaving your house for a while. It might begin to spin uncontrollably fast and create an awful lot of hyperbole-y activity.
how is it even funny if you don't know what it means?
That answered my question.

Chuck Norris is a martial artist that had an acting career. He got a second wind of fame when he became a meme… Chuck Norris Facts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Norris_facts
Do the satellite-side phased arraying work that quickly to go to the per-customer level? I figured it would just be used to account for the spinning and moving nature of the satellite.
Served time is useless! You’re always guilty!
I think that LLMs are going to be really great for home automation and with Home Assistant we couldn't be better prepared as a platform for experimentation for this: all your data is local, fully accessible and Home Assistant is open source and can easily be extended with custom code or interface with custom models. All other major smart home platforms limit you in how you can access your own data.

Here are some things that I expect LLMs to be able to do for Home Assistant users:

Home automation is complicated. Every house has different technology and that means that every Home Assistant installation is made up of a different combination of integrations and things that are possible. We should be able to get LLMs to offer users help with any of the problems they are stuck with, including suggested solutions, that are tailored to their situation. And in their own language. Examples could be: create a dashboard for my train collection or suggest tweaks to my radiators to make sure each room warms up at a similar rate.

Another thing that's awesome about LLMs is that you control them using language. This means that you could write a rule book for your house and let the LLM make sure the rules are enforced. Example rules:

* Make sure the light in the entrance is on when people come home.
* Make automated lights turn on at 20% brightness at night.
* Turn on the fan when the humidity or air quality is bad.

Home Assistant could ship with a default rule book that users can edit. Such rule books could also become the way one could switch between smart home platforms.
I would probably describe him as a scientist who moonlighted as a parson, not the other way around.
It's OK to say "I was wrong". No one will think less of you for acknowledging your error and correcting it.
> It seems strange to me that we built institutions on the idea of filtering in/out applicants based on relatively arbitrary criteria, and then express shock/surprise when the reward systems inside that institution are.. basically the same?

I think it is impossible to use anything other than noisy signals in many of these processes. I'm not bothered by the noise. But what I am bothered by is pretending the noise doesn't exist or trying to convince people it is a feature and not a bug. Why not just admit the process is noisy and that we're just doing our best? These processes may still be frustrating, but they will be less so and it leaves the door open to fixing issues if they are actually fixable.

With the way we publish science, I find it very odd. We are doing essentially the same thing we have done for centuries with only a few minor tweaks. But unlike the past we don't have many of the same constraints; such as, printing, lack of color, distribution/storage, communication (which is arguably the main purpose of papers), video, and so on. Why are we stuck in the 18th century with a sprinkling of 21st century (plots/graphics and arxiv)? We can track data, reproduction efforts, failures, challenges, and all that stuff. Is not the point of science the pursuit of knowledge? If so, it seems like we're being pretty inefficient. I think there's just something funny about how we publish papers on things like computer graphics and video but constrain our communication methods to a piece of paper.
The earth doesn't care.

I was making the point that the parent commenter made an arbitrary distinction that wasn't even true.

There are other minerals, rather are side effects of mining the true target minerals, that are "burnable". They're used in fireworks to make them different colors.

https://mineralseducationcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/te...
Super cool. I love how minimalistic the identification UI is -- just dwell on the subject for a few seconds, and the holographic reticle changes to the name of the bird. No extra text, no complicated interactions. Really nice work making the AI feel integrated and native to the UI.
so 49 killed by the pair.
Nitter.net has disappeared
How can you tell it's an affiliate?
In 1700s?
My research group left D for Rust several years ago due to nonresponsiveness and poor language development trajectory.

While I wish Adam and the others success with OpenD, I hope they can take the opportunity to pick a more unique/memorable name.
Depends on why you didn't like New Sun. Long Sun is a rather different beast.

I loved New Sun for the intricate writing and picaresque SF dying earth, time loops, meta-fiction, cosmology and so on; but Long Sun is written in a much flatter 'late Wolfe' style, is more straightforward and introspective, more of an extended meditation on religion (even false ones) & leadership & personal integrity.

You can like both, but I don't think I've seen many people claiming to like them equally. (And Short Sun is even less popular - it's just a bit too weird in delving into Wolfe's subtle fixation on insects/vampires and memory loss/personal identity, and you have to get through Long Sun first which is almost as different from Short Sun as Long Sun was from New Sun... I'm not sure if anyone really likes Short Sun.)
The Reddit Moderation Maze: A Visit to the Layers of Hell
> Targeting class diversity naturally gets you racial diversity anyways.

Not only that, the opposite doesn't. There are fewer black kids than white kids who grew up in affluent / middle class families, but not so few that you couldn't fill every diversity slot at an elite university with them.

Which defeats the proper purpose of the program. You're supposed to be giving opportunities to people who didn't have them and bringing different perspectives into the student body, not further advantaging the most privileged subset of the people who can check the important box on the form who grew up in the same neighborhood as the other elite students.
I am not sure that cheaper designs mean higher risks. Technology has improved a lot in rockets just as it has in cars.
10 years ago people were complaining that candidates couldn't even write a for loop in interviews.
> C is generally first compiled into assembly anyways.

Splitting hairs perhaps, but the C compiler output is machine code, right? No reason to generate assembly along the way.
How have those new features faired? From what I've heard UX and reliability has degraded. Moderation is non-existent and harassment is increasing. They can't even live stream Elon's own guests to a few million people.
The worst thing about laziness is how everyone is against the idea. Hey, you have 1 guy in me who sees that as justifiable and valid expression.
Zwave & zigbee + HA or another home automation platform > some wifi connected data mining crap with vendor lockin for turning off lights across the room.
Streaming responses is definitely something that we should look into. The challenge is that we cannot just stream single words, but would need to find a way to learn how to cut up sentences. Probably starting with paragraphs is a good first start.
well yes, but it likely will be a “telephone number” and not even a simple one like say `2MASS J19593766+2246141` which is 2MASS (the survey name) and the coordinates of the star in the J2000 epoch: 19:59:37.66 +22:46:14.1 .

The Gaia ones (which is the billion star catalogue) look like `Gaia DR3 1827256624493300096`; the number basically contains the rough coordinates of the star as a HEALPix index (along with some other data) so it's not really human readable, but is perhaps more suited for a survey with billions of sources.

Ironically, the Gaia catalogue is incomplete at the brighter end (very bright stars like Betelgeuse for example are not in the catalogue at all) so still needs to be supplemented by other catalogues (and can't be used as a single source of truth to which all other catalogues are cross-matched for example)

HEALPix: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HEALPix
Why are you ignoring that the person who made the original claim about 3.7 GB of data per day stated that it could be an accuracy issue with his router?
I nominate "dope", short for "D, OPEned".
I won't be the one to solve it, but we thought the sound barrier was unbreakable a few centuries ago. I won't underestimate human ingenuity.

I think more likely is we figure out wormholes. If we can't go light speed we can instead fold space like a piece of paper and reduce the space we need to Traverse. That may or may not be as easy as FTL.
only poisonous in quantity, small amounts like from your hand would be tolerable. We just don't want alcoholics drinking a whole bottle to feed their addiction and then winding up blind.
Excluding people 16-24 would definitely remove the vast majority of the population addressed above.
Why are you assuming anything, just learn how the game works. This game can be solved on the command line with grep. There is no opponent. What are you talking about here?
I can't help but think of someone downloading "Best Assistant Ever LLM" which pretends to be good but unlocks the doors for thieves or whatever.

Is that a dumb fear? With an app I need to trust the app maker. With an app that takes random LLMs I also need to trust the LLM maker.

For text gen, or image gen I don't care but for home automation, suddenly it matters if the LLM unlocks my doors, turns on/off my cameras, turns on/off my heat/aircon, sprinklers, lights, etc...
Reddit has the most concise answer

https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/41u5hw/comment...

> A terminal is a physical device with a keyboard and screen connected to a computer running various OS types. A tty is the Unix device name for a physical or virtual terminal connection. A shell is the Unix command interpreter. A console is a generic term for a primary i/o device or interface. In unix terms the console is where the boot/startup messages are sent to. After bootup the console effectively becomes a terminal.
Jokes are always confusing and could potentially lead to death. So how many people are we okay with dying so that we can tell jokes? Couple million seems reasonable.
This is a cool idea. Two questions:

Arion can wrap docker-compose and run as a project or part of a nixos config. Did you come across Arion before creating this, and have you compared them?

I had a brief look through your examples and it doesn’t look like compose2nix implements docker-compose’s network per compose file. Is this something you want to add?
SM64 uses SGI's IRIS Development Option (IDO) compiler. And yes, it's unoptimised.

Paper Mario, however, /does/ use GCC, and it's optimised. Figuring out the compiler version was fairly easy as there's a limited number of options - we know when the game began development, so we looked for releases around that time. The harder parts were figuring out compiler flags (consider all the -f flags affecting code generation; papermario used -fforce-addr) and coming to the terrifying conclusion that the compiler was modified!

The majority of papermario was built with a modified build of GCC 2.8.1 [1] at -O2. The SDK code (libultra, nusystem) was built with GCC 2.7.2 at -O3. The iQue Player version, i.e. the Chinese release, was built with EGCS.

[1] https://github.com/pmret/gcc-papermario
Follow up post: https://dpldocs.info/this-week-in-d/Blog.Posted_2024_01_08.h...
> We're not talking about answering more slowly though. Nobody would care if it answered these questions correctly but slower.

Yes, we are, because it is a feedforward net with no recurrency or adaptive computation. Its responses are equivalent to your System I responses emitted with no time to think. Whereas if it is equipped with mechanisms like retrieval, which would put facts into the context, then that is more analogous to giving you a few seconds to response before flunking you: you get time to pull things into your short-term & working memory and cogitate them. And as mentioned, it does fine at answering B-is-A if the relevant A-is-B fact is in its working memory.

> The discussion points out that this would often yield very strange and incorrect statements being fed to the model.

They're not strange if they are fed en masse, nor are they 'incorrect'. A reversed string is not 'wrong'. It is just a reversed string. (If you look at something in a mirror or upside down, it's not 'incorrect'. It's just in a mirror or upside down.)
Not sure why you're being downvoted?
"Dopen" then?
> enough mass

It's not a question of enough mass. It's a question of being compact enough. There is no minimum mass for a black hole, but the smaller the mass, the smaller the surface area of the horizon (the 2-sphere that the mass has to collapse inside to form the hole).
The question wasn't why can they, it was why might they.
Here's a scoring guide from a US university for DEI statements. To me it's much more informative to go to primary sources for what is selected for, rather than only reading about them second hand.

https://ofew.berkeley.edu/recruitment/contributions-diversit...
Let me find you the video clip I saw of demonstrators in Toronto.