skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The usual suspects have cheap low-end switches:

https://store.ui.com/us/en/pro/category/all-switching/produc...

https://mikrotik.com/product/RB260GS

If you want a serious switch, you can often find a big name used switch for $100 or even less. eBay has a couple of 12-port Ruckus switches listed right now, for example.

Oddly, if you want to purchase a license to enable the fancier capabilities of Ruckus switches (those “12 port” 1Gbps switches actually have two 10Gbps ports), it’s surprisingly awkward to find anyone selling the licenses to individual users. On the other hand, the documentation quite strongly suggests that there is no verification whatsoever if you simply tell the switch that you have the appropriate license.

(I assume that there are a few things going on here. First, big users who buy tens or hundreds of these switches will have accounts and will actually pay for licenses as needed and presumably get decent pricing. Small users are basically irrelevant to the manufacturer’s bottom line. And serious users will regularly use in a configuration in which they don’t have Internet access, and will quite sensibly refuse to purchase the switch if it needs Internet access.)

(Whoops, the campus network is down because the core switch needs to re-validate its license. But it can’t re-validate its license because it can’t access the Internet until after it starts working again. Better choose a new vendor next time!)
Because Python 2 only died a couple of years ago. There are people still using it.
Speaking of WW2 spies, this is a crazy larger than life character.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Pujol_García
> A study at Swansea University found incels - or involuntary celibates - overestimated physical attractiveness and finances, while underestimating kindness, humour and loyalty.

If incels are less attractive and less well-off than the average (I don’t know if they are, but it seems plausible), then they will be more affected by women’s financial and attractiveness preferences than the average, which in turn will inform their views. So the “thinking error” might be based on actual experience.
Warthog Project built a multi-projector surround display that might be of interest: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsleWkgOsak (later upgraded to 270 degrees).

HDR Projectors are also a thing now: https://youtu.be/iFJsEfWsTd4?t=852
I always liked trying to find the ISS myself while camping but there’s so damn many satellites up there now, it’s hard to tell which is which!
Agreed! Big Mac patties are wafer-thin and that bun disc in the middle makes the sandwich look bigger. I'll bet they're the most profitable burger on their menu.
Juul was found do be doing exactly this, so your priors should now be that a spike in child usage of nicotine products is plausibly due to targeted advertising.
I wouldn't mind having a dumb watch with one of these batteries that would basically never need to be replaced throughout its lifetime.

That would be a cool exercise to make it comsume the tiniest amount of power as possible.
Mixing milliseconds down to picoseconds made the columns too wide. All of the benchmark data is also available as JSON in the benchmark_results directory if you wanted to drop it into sheets or some other analysis.
Perhaps you are not familiar with how ai and machine learning work, and that’s okay, but ai doesn’t “study” and most certainly doesn’t “inspire” itself. It builds token databases that it then regurgitates. There no resemblance of human behaviour, just a simulation. Software always did that.
Momoa was in a different movie entirely. They could have pulled it off - had there been any character that was a tonal middle-ground between him and EVERYONE ELSE it would have gone a long way to making the movie feel more dynamic and alive, less as a series of rote set-pieces.
I find it significantly less jarring than STR."hi"
Care to share what you're working towards?
PyPi has robust cryptography libraries from likes of Google, others. You do not need to implement them yourself. You can just install a well-known library used by the best in the software development industry.
I measure societies by what they’re hysterical about. It’s the best measurement of character there is imo.
Why would other pros say “nuh-uh, that’s not a thing”? I thought the concept of a tell was widely known.
Drew DeVault isn't exactly known for his thoughtful and well-reasoned takes.
Giving Boeing a pass just increases the blast radius to the airline industry and consumers. The management at Boeing putting in place an incentive structure counter to safety and engineering should be removed and replaced with people who can enable a return to an engineering and safety culture.

Make Boeing management face the music and contain the blast radius to those who have lead poorly.
From my son I know that they call them snus, even the ones without tobacco in them.
I just don’t see a strong association. It’s like saying environmentalism is a cause of terrorism because of the Unabomber. Technically correct, but it seems weird to group it in the same category as things like white supremacy, jihadism, etc.
Tangent, but the red squiggly underlines on your website invoke spelling errors in Word (and other apps) vibes. Not what you're going for I assume :-)
It's not really about linguistics vs math or English majors "not understanding the code".

It's that English Majors don't understand how language works. Of course, neither do ML Researchers but their methods aren't contingent on understanding the problem space so that doesn't really matter.

Grammar is not how language works. It's useful fiction. English Majors have little to no "special insight" to give. When they do give "insight", it's more likely to derail the process than help it.

This is the conclusion after decades of trying it the way you imagine.
What's wrong with the linked site? It looks good on my phone. (not tested with a desktop)
I have a question about array languages that I've been wondering for a while: lets say you have the task "find all numbers smaller than N where predicate P is true". You know, like, "find all primes smaller than 1000", or "find all pythagorean triplets where Z is less than 1,000,000", something like that. The general pattern for doing this in an imperative language would be to have a for-loop that tests the predicate inside and then does something with the number. In a functional language, you'd use recursion or map/filter on a lazy list, something like that.

(to be clear, this is in the general case where you don't know exactly what P is. for the specific problem of finding primes smaller than N, you could obviously use sieves and stuff, but i'm more curious about the general pattern of problems like this)

Having only had limited exposure to array languages, my understanding is that in general the way to do that would be to do something like:

1. Generate an array from 1 to N

2. Test the array against the predicate, getting a new array with 0s and 1s (a mask, essentially)

3. Apply that mask to the array to get only elements where the predicate is true

Which is all fine, and I imagine that it takes a stupendously small amount of characters to do this. But my question is: what if N is large, and the predicate isn't true very often? Like, what if N is a billion or something? This is not an issue in the imperative/functional cases, because they don't have to generate the array in step 1, they can just loop/recurse/lazily generate the values (i.e. memory is O(1) for this). But it seems extraordinarily wasteful in array languages both of memory and resources to generate two different billion element arrays (the 1..N array and the mask) just to get out a handful of values.

That question is pretty specific, but this is one of my biggest questions about array languages in general. Aren't you always generating TONS of temporary arrays for no real reason, that will just pass through the calculation? Isn't that really slow? Or does the implementation somehow optimize this stuff away, maybe by using something like lazy evaluation?
I think it is officially supported, but honestly I use firmware from GL.Inet web interface is great
What's with the cluster of extremely high prices in the southwest?
The researcher does address that. Here's a quote from the article:

> He said: "If you look at incels who have committed extreme acts of violence, a lot of the time when you scratch beneath the surface, they tend to either be pretending that they're incel, or it's not the number one factor motivating their actions."
Flectofy
Eh... No let kids more freedom but equip them with the skills and knowledge to choose. Kids are not property.
On HN? Never. This entire thread is proof of it.
You must be thinking of a different game. With Mastermind, the chosen 4 colours are hidden and the other player tries to guess the colours and positions.
No idea, but the current eligible generations definitely grew up with that.
Ruby has managed to be incredibly self-compatible while adding new features for many many years now. Its main weakness compared to Python is its performance but that’s been steadily improving every year with each new (backwards compatible) Ruby release. And for 99% of apps it’s fast enough.
That's exactly it. For me the turning point was to read some 'letters to home' written by the good little Nazi's about how they just incinerated a couple of hundred sub-humans doing them a favor in the process and by the way how is little Helmut and has Heidi's lung condition cleared up, your loving husband and father, Sigmund...

It's also why certain groups respond very lively when you call them by their true name: they are utterly in denial about their possible futures give or take an unlucky turn of events or two. The veneer is very thin. You find them in the halls of politics, in the police force, in the armed forces, in the offices of just about any company, at your local soccer club and just about everywhere else. And none of them is going to come out to admit it. I seriously wonder how big a fraction of a society has the subscribe to this kind of ideology before it is unavoidable that it will be expressed but I wouldn't be surprised at all if it was well under 50%.
>Did you know that Einstein was strikingly muscular

Any refferences in the book on how much he benched? Asking for a friend.
I like both Kotlin and Swift but much prefer Swift as a language.

That said, I don't disagree that if Google backed it properly (seems unlikely now, considering they just fired the guy who led Guava/Guice, for example), it would do really well.
Starlink Successfully Tests Space Direct to Cell Mobile Service
There were many other chat apps on Android which were phone number based (Viber, Line (which even used to pay if you used it) not to mention hangouts which every android user had. Whatsapp won because the product was too simple, and the non tech users preferred it very very strongly. Obviously the founders got incredibly luckly being at the right place at the right time, but they had plenty competition and won by executing better and making the right product decisions.
> if that's accurate, it's likely that this is completely unrelated to Boeing's significant manufacturing problems lately.

I'm not sure how "recent" lately is referring to here, but it seems Boeing have had engineering/manufacturing issues for quite some time.

About the 787 Dreamliner:

> Early 787 operations encountered several problems caused mainly by its lithium-ion batteries, which culminated in fires onboard some aircraft. In January 2013, the U.S. FAA grounded all 787s until it approved the revised battery design in April 2013. Significant quality control issues from 2019 onwards caused a production slowdown and, from January 2021 until August 2022, an almost total cessation of deliveries.

Maybe it's just finally catching up with them?
Ask HN: How would you take care of your mental well-being?
In the new year, do you have any plans to enhance your mental well-being? I'm curious about everyone's preferences when it comes to working with a counselor.

Would you prefer 1) speaking to a counselor on-demand for a single session when experiencing a panic attack or a terrible event, or 2) would you opt for an extended, long-term plan with the same counselor over multiple sessions?

Option 1: "Choose to pay only for individual sessions as needed. Focus on managing your current situation and learning emotional regulation. Each session guides you through coping strategies, creating a progressive journey."

Option 2: "Opt for a long-term plan involving a financial commitment, working consistently with the same counselor. This option delves into your personal life to identify root causes of emotional issues and offers treatment based on a thorough diagnosis."

Please feel free to post your thoughts. Thank you :)
Typical range for a flagship single-access point solution I would say, previously I had portalwifi (from kickstarter) and flint 2 has better range

If you have 2+ story house you need a mesh.
Well I default to the views of Cate Hall, who wrote the article, and she agrees that it’s all about luck and little about agency.

https://sashachapin.substack.com/p/things-you-learn-dating-c...

Cate views her own life through a frame of responsibility: she takes responsibility for what happens to her. At the same time, she is genuinely not proud, and genuinely doesn’t think she’s better than anyone else. She credits luck for her good fortune and unusual attributes more than anything else, and is compassionate and curious toward everyone we meet. This is, I think, what sticks with me most.
I'm actually surprised that 18% aren't. I always assumed that all McDonalds are franchises, with a few exceptions for halo stores and the likes.
Oh. You’re right. All scales of business are the same, and counterfeit prevention is the same at all sizes. Also the number of products a small business sells is the same as a large business.

You got me.

I fucking hate Amazon, but you got me.
+1 for https://taconomical.com/ Texas is really divided.
Microsoft invested $10B after GPT4 came out… their initial investment of $1B might have been for R&D, but their $10B investment was for tech that they knew about.
As with most things in life, absolutes do no favors. Some are victims, and some are probably just assholes. Wholesale discounting their experiences and feelings is no way to help them through their issues, made up or not.
The incel movement has a root of truth warped to comical degrees by online exposure.

But the essence of an incel is a perception of rejection by society, specifically from the sexual marketplace. There have been many many articles sourcing actual data that shows, especially with the friction reduction of dating apps, that selection pattern differences among women and men show that women reject a far far higher portion of the opposing gender than men do. The OKCupid data that was publicly released backs this up, and other articles analyzing online dating trends have also concluded this.

Male and female pairings used to be more restricted geographically and by limited social graph sizes, both of which restrictions have been removed.

Now, social evolution around apps is occurring at lightspeed compared to previous generations. So obviously the current trends may reflect a lack of awareness by women and men of the reality compared to the fantasy that the dating apps present.

So Incels are likely the extreme tail of the male side of the coin.

Of course, incels are rejected males, and then further get this compounded by their views being summarily rejected, and then further rejected as not just sexually undesirable, but socially undesirable (which are strongly correlated anyway).

So, why should we care about some sad nerds in a basement, society has always kicked dirt on them? Yes they blow up once in a while, something that America has fundamental tolerance of without the Incel angle.

No, why we should care is that Incels are a marker for general issues in overall pairing, dating, and reproduction and eventually the demographic health of a country.
Today we also have videotape. I wish all the lectures I attended had been taped. I'd like to retake those courses via the tape.
> seems to be in-house

This is key. The unethical part is not the use of AI (which is neutral), but corpos taking billions in profits from creators using creators' own copyrighted works. BigAI currently feels entitled to simply take these works for their own use, without permission or licensing.

This isn't hard stuff. Adobe Firefly is an example of an ethical, safe AI-powered art product that has been trained on owned stock images, licensed content, and public domain content.
Would it be possible to include Canada? food inflation has been massive over the last couple years.
Al Gore Leaves Board. Tim Cook's Pay Dropped 36% After Shareholder Pressure
From that abstract:

> Furthermore, incels underestimated women’s overall minimum mate preference standards

Is it saying that things are actually worse than incels believe? Womens demands are actually higher than incels thinks and therefore things are even more hopeless for the incels than they currently think?
It seems like you’re just being obstinate. At some point in the game, you’re going to be so unlucky that it’s improbable you don’t succeed. If I’m making an absurd claim, you’re doing exactly the same thing.
> Democratic governments are not the perfect thing you seem to make it out to be.

? where did I say that?
How many buildings collapse in the world daily? How many catch fire and burn to the ground?

How many trucks and cars self combust or lose a wheel?

How many trains derail out of the tracks?

Aviation people and regulators are so paranoid, they hold a chokehold on global economic growth, maybe only nuclear regulators causes more GDP and quality of life losses.

Instead of grounding them or demolishing them send these plane to Africa, they will take them
Clojure actually has a fair amount in common with Array Languages, at least the mapping and conformation.

That being said, I really really like Array Languages for certain subsets of problems over anything else.

I kinda think every language and have an embedded Array Language engine, kinda like how Regex works so well for text processing.
Ah, I see we are in "charitable interpretation mode." Let's do it again:

One side wants sane immigration reform. The other side wants an end to white people.
This seems like a fairly weak review, it just presents links to other papers with a lot of “might”s. I don’t see any meta-analysis computing actual harm.

Eg “nicotine and cancer”:

> In addition, nicotine is a precursor of tobacco specific nitrosamines (TSNAs), through nitrosation in the oral cavity.[32,33] It is shown that nitrosation of nicotine could lead to formation of NNN and NNK. This effect of nicotine may be important…

As Gwern noted, the cardiovascular risks are nonzero, but it doesn’t seem like there is evidence of a strong effect for increasing cancer. (Still room for a weak effect I suppose.)
Well done.
Any personal findings?
I cant find the link, but I i recently saw a projector project where someone used a deconstructed android phone with the backlight removed from the screen, and a light/lens combo to get >1080p. Though that limits you to Android apps or RDP, it might be a starting point to hack your own.

Stellarium does have an android app but its a fraction of the desktop app functionally.
> every memory access can cause a synchronous signal (SIGSEGV/SIGBUS)

AFAIU you have all the same problems as soon as you translate more than one instruction at a time and allow merging them, which QEMU does, even if just at basic block level. IIRC post-SIGSEGV state is not 100% correct in QEMU, but I'd need to investigate some more.

We built a dynamic binary translator for a customer dealing with mainframes using ORC JIT where we translate large amounts of code, handle self-modifying code and caching things on disk (similar approach to the one you suggest). Compile time is a problem, but then we the performance results are impressive. Giving visibility over loops to LLVM helps a lot.

But the real reason why nothing like this is upstream is that it's difficult to get things upstream, it requires a lot of effort compared to putting together a PoC. :)
Also worth mentioning: https://celestiaproject.space/

It used to be packaged and readily available in most distros, now it is not. I wonder what's that about.

You can zoom out and see the local group and Virgo supercluster.
Strange no one commented but apparently Bradley Cooper (of all people) is working on making it. https://movieweb.com/bradley-cooper-hyperion-movie-epic/

No definite timeline on it.
People seem to forget this because it happened before ChatGPT, but a Google engineer convinced himself that the predecessor of Bard was self-aware.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/google-engineer-c...

The AI mentioned is LaMDA, which according to this blog post powers Bard:

https://blog.google/technology/ai/bard-google-ai-search-upda...
DJI introduces an areal delivery drone, 30kg max payload, 16km range [video]
No, a word processor is a very poor tool for reasoning through the solutions to technical problems, compared to paper or a blackboard. You need to be able to draw, doodle, make tables and charts, write with whatever symbols you can imagine, etc.

Once you have a solution in hand, you can use computer drawing tools to make a polished version for publication. But that's a different problem than the original reasoning.
That's neither here nor there. I have speakers that are 16 years old, Creative Gigaworks T3. In their 6th year, the circuit board in their sound remote died, rendering them useless. There are no complex chips there, nothing proprietary, but Creative no longer manufactured it, 5 years old, and so repair was impossible.

I was able to fix them by finding someone who sells a replacement remote on TaoBao and getting a shipping company to send it to me at 2x the price.

Point is - availability of parts does not guarantee manufacturer has any interest is supporting the product.

On the contrary, if manufacturer wants to fix something, they actually can, even if exact same parts aren't available.
>I mean is that all scalable channels seem saturated currently

What facts lead you to this observation?

What channels are you referring to?

>Getting an audience to validate an idea is as much work if not more than building the idea.

Is an audience absolutely necessary or are a few paying customers enough? The answers to this question and yours depend on what you're trying to achieve, on the sector, the people you want to serve, etc. These dictate the channels.

>So how do you scale this?

Scale what exactly? And do you have something that works and is viable (in a business sense) you want to scale.

I'd say we live in a world with more noise where attention is scarce. It is a time to focus more, eliminate the superfluous, concentrate on fundamentals, reduce buzzwords, experiment, and be systematic.
Not the best example but here's one:

https://www.studocu.com/en-gb/document/university-of-cambrid...

Bit difficult to find because they aren't publicly available.
> Boeing moved its corporate headquarters [there] in 2001 when they opted to leave Seattle for Chicago.

It's been going downhill since management physical separated itself from engineering/production.
Isn’t the ratio between men and women on these apps a problem that messes up the interpretation of these observations? Genuinely curious.